Meeting City Council Formal Meeting-7/1/2022 complete
2022-07-01 · Formal
Items: 163
City Council Formal Meeting
Synced: 2026-05-28 03:37 AZ
Item text
Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.
Page 17
ATTACHMENT A
To: City Council Date: July 1, 2022
From: Mayor Kate Gallego
Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES
The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Councilwoman Ann O’Brien recommends the following for appointment:
Stephanie Brewer
Ms. Brewer is the Executive Director of Newtown Community Development Corporation
and a resident of District 1. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2023.
James Sutphen
Mr. Sutphen is an investigator at the Arizona Department of Public Safety and a
resident of District 1. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2023.
Neighborhood Block Watch Fund Oversight Committee
Vice Mayor Laura Pastor recommends the following for appointment:
Dan Carroll
Mr. Carroll is a realtor with Realty ONE Group and a resident of District 3. He fills a
vacancy for a term to expire June 30, 2023.
Parks and Recreation Board
I recommend the following for appointment:
Ed Zuercher
Mr. Zuercher is the former City of Phoenix City Manager and parks advocate. He
replaces Masavi Perea for a term to expire July 1, 2027.
Page 18
Phoenix Business Workforce Development Board
I recommend the following for appointment:
Alison Rapping
Ms. Rapping is the Chief Executive Officer of Arouet. She fills a vacancy for a term to
expire June 30, 2025.
I recommend the following for reappointment:
Dawna Cato
Ms. Cato will serve her first full term to expire June 30, 2025.
Jon Ellerston
Mr. Ellerston will serve his first full term to expire June 30, 2025.
Patrick Fitzhugh
Mr. Fitzhugh will serve his first full term to expire June 30, 2025.
Kaaren-Lyn Graves
Ms. Graves will serve her second term to expire June 30, 2025.
Brendan Mahoney
Mr. Mahoney will serve his first full term to expire June 30, 2025.
Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Local Police Pension Board
Santos Robles
Mr. Robles was elected to the PSPRS Local Police Pension Board to serve as a
representative of sworn Police Department employees and is a Police Officer with the
expire on June 30, 2026.
Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Local Fire Pension Board
Brian Moore
Mr. Moore was re-elected to the PSPRS Local Fire Pension Board to serve as a
representative of sworn Fire Department employees and is a Captain with the City of
Phoenix Fire Department. His four-year term begins on July 1, 2022 and will expire on
June 30, 2026.
Page 19
Report
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.
Page 17
ATTACHMENT A
To: City Council Date: July 1, 2022
From: Mayor Kate Gallego
Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES
The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
Councilwoman Ann O’Brien recommends the following for appointment:
Stephanie Brewer
Ms. Brewer is the Executive Director of Newtown Community Development Corporation
and a resident of District 1. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2023.
James Sutphen
Mr. Sutphen is an investigator at the Arizona Department of Public Safety and a
resident of District 1. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2023.
Neighborhood Block Watch Fund Oversight Committee
Vice Mayor Laura Pastor recommends the following for appointment:
Dan Carroll
Mr. Carroll is a realtor with Realty ONE Group and a resident of District 3. He fills a
vacancy for a term to expire June 30, 2023.
Parks and Recreation Board
I recommend the following for appointment:
Ed Zuercher
Mr. Zuercher is the former City of Phoenix City Manager and parks advocate. He
replaces Masavi Perea for a term to expire July 1, 2027.
Page 18
Phoenix Business Workforce Development Board
I recommend the following for appointment:
Alison Rapping
Ms. Rapping is the Chief Executive Officer of Arouet. She fills a vacancy for a term to
expire June 30, 2025.
I recommend the following for reappointment:
Dawna Cato
Ms. Cato will serve her first full term to expire June 30, 2025.
Jon Ellerston
Mr. Ellerston will serve his first full term to expire June 30, 2025.
Patrick Fitzhugh
Mr. Fitzhugh will serve his first full term to expire June 30, 2025.
Kaaren-Lyn Graves
Ms. Graves will serve her second term to expire June 30, 2025.
Brendan Mahoney
Mr. Mahoney will serve his first full term to expire June 30, 2025.
Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Local Police Pension Board
Santos Robles
Mr. Robles was elected to the PSPRS Local Police Pension Board to serve as a
representative of sworn Police Department employees and is a Police Officer with the
expire on June 30, 2026.
Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Local Fire Pension Board
Brian Moore
Mr. Moore was re-elected to the PSPRS Local Fire Pension Board to serve as a
representative of sworn Fire Department employees and is a Captain with the City of
Phoenix Fire Department. His four-year term begins on July 1, 2022 and will expire on
June 30, 2026.
Page 19
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Thunderbird Liquor
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070012.
Summary
Applicant
Vinal Patel, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
4920 W. Thunderbird Road, Ste. 129
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1
This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a liquor
store. This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate
with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 4, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Page 20
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have successfully operated a Liquor store and Gas Station for the last 3 years prior
to purchasing Thunderbird Liquor on May 2nd 2022. Thunderbird Liquor was issued a
#9 Liquor license for 15+ years now. I am very familiar with the rules and regulations
as provided under the Title 4 training courses.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This has been a neighborhood Liquor store for over 15 years providing responsible,
accountable service to the local community. As the owner of Thunderbird Liquor, public
safety is our shared responsibility for everyone who enters my store. Located off 51st
Ave and Thunderbird Rd, our customers truly appreciate the convenience we bring for
them having a Liquor and Convenience Store closer to their home.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Thunderbird Liquor
Liquor License Map - Thunderbird Liquor
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 21
Liquor License Data: THUNDERBIRD LIQUOR
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1
Liquor Store 9 4 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 2 1
Restaurant 12 5 4
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 0.45 0.10
Violent Crimes 10.06 0.29 0.31
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 32
Total Violations 93 50
Page 22
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1042173 1381 51 % 18 % 8%
1042181 1368 85 % 8% 6%
1042182 926 72 % 3% 3%
1042183 1664 19 % 4% 20 %
1042191 1602 85 % 0% 13 %
1042241 813 22 % 15 % 15 %
1042242 1937 95 % 14 % 2%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 23
Liquor License Map: THUNDERBIRD LIQUOR
4920 W THUNDERBIRD RD
Ü
Date: 6/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 24
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070012.
Summary
Applicant
Vinal Patel, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
4920 W. Thunderbird Road, Ste. 129
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1
This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a liquor
store. This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate
with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 4, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Page 20
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have successfully operated a Liquor store and Gas Station for the last 3 years prior
to purchasing Thunderbird Liquor on May 2nd 2022. Thunderbird Liquor was issued a
#9 Liquor license for 15+ years now. I am very familiar with the rules and regulations
as provided under the Title 4 training courses.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This has been a neighborhood Liquor store for over 15 years providing responsible,
accountable service to the local community. As the owner of Thunderbird Liquor, public
safety is our shared responsibility for everyone who enters my store. Located off 51st
Ave and Thunderbird Rd, our customers truly appreciate the convenience we bring for
them having a Liquor and Convenience Store closer to their home.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Thunderbird Liquor
Liquor License Map - Thunderbird Liquor
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 21
Liquor License Data: THUNDERBIRD LIQUOR
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1
Liquor Store 9 4 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 2 1
Restaurant 12 5 4
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 0.45 0.10
Violent Crimes 10.06 0.29 0.31
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 32
Total Violations 93 50
Page 22
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1042173 1381 51 % 18 % 8%
1042181 1368 85 % 8% 6%
1042182 926 72 % 3% 3%
1042183 1664 19 % 4% 20 %
1042191 1602 85 % 0% 13 %
1042241 813 22 % 15 % 15 %
1042242 1937 95 % 14 % 2%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 23
Liquor License Map: THUNDERBIRD LIQUOR
4920 W THUNDERBIRD RD
Ü
Date: 6/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 24
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Angie's Mini Market
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197594.
Summary
Applicant
Raphael Rafo, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
3563 W. Dunlap Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 16, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Page 25
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I hold a certificate for The Basic Liquor Law Training. This training provided me the
opporturnity of learning the importance and significance of obtaining a beer and wine
license. I am assured to uphold the laws and regulations about beer and wine license.
I have never been involved in any criminal activity, no record of getting in trouble with
the law and authorities.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This store will provide a safe and secure place for the neighborhood to buy beer and
wine. The location will be convenient for the people in neighborhood who may not
have access to transportation. Adding the long time experience of the owner with
running a store while upholding all the laws and regulations, the store will be a safe,
secure and convenience place for the customers to purchase quality liquor.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Angie's Mini Market
Liquor License Map - Angie's Mini Market
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 26
Liquor License Data: ANGIE'S MINI MARKET
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 4 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 3 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 9 6
Restaurant 12 7 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 59.42 71.54
Violent Crimes 5.03 16.29 26.11
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 183
Total Violations 93 383
Page 27
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1042051 1264 61 % 16 % 7%
1042053 1213 89 % 9% 3%
1042054 1577 5% 21 % 30 %
1042061 1580 92 % 7% 28 %
1042062 1557 65 % 6% 34 %
1042063 998 92 % 7% 3%
1056022 2457 38 % 23 % 34 %
1056023 2787 15 % 21 % 27 %
1057011 1471 65 % 4% 6%
1057021 2725 66 % 7% 22 %
1057022 1187 68 % 22 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 28
Liquor License Map: ANGIE'S MINI MARKET
3563 W DUNLAP AVE
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 29
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197594.
Summary
Applicant
Raphael Rafo, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
3563 W. Dunlap Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 16, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Page 25
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I hold a certificate for The Basic Liquor Law Training. This training provided me the
opporturnity of learning the importance and significance of obtaining a beer and wine
license. I am assured to uphold the laws and regulations about beer and wine license.
I have never been involved in any criminal activity, no record of getting in trouble with
the law and authorities.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This store will provide a safe and secure place for the neighborhood to buy beer and
wine. The location will be convenient for the people in neighborhood who may not
have access to transportation. Adding the long time experience of the owner with
running a store while upholding all the laws and regulations, the store will be a safe,
secure and convenience place for the customers to purchase quality liquor.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Angie's Mini Market
Liquor License Map - Angie's Mini Market
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 26
Liquor License Data: ANGIE'S MINI MARKET
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 4 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 3 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 9 6
Restaurant 12 7 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 59.42 71.54
Violent Crimes 5.03 16.29 26.11
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 183
Total Violations 93 383
Page 27
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1042051 1264 61 % 16 % 7%
1042053 1213 89 % 9% 3%
1042054 1577 5% 21 % 30 %
1042061 1580 92 % 7% 28 %
1042062 1557 65 % 6% 34 %
1042063 998 92 % 7% 3%
1056022 2457 38 % 23 % 34 %
1056023 2787 15 % 21 % 27 %
1057011 1471 65 % 4% 6%
1057021 2725 66 % 7% 22 %
1057022 1187 68 % 22 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 28
Liquor License Map: ANGIE'S MINI MARKET
3563 W DUNLAP AVE
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 29
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Fry's Food & Drug #96
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070072 and
09070072S.
Summary
Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent
License Type
Series 9 and 9S - Liquor Store with Sampling Privileges
Location
26300 N. Norterra Pkwy.
Zoning Classification: PUD
Council District: 1
This request is for a location transfer of a liquor license and addition of sampling
privileges for a grocery store. This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales
and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 12, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
Page 30
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We have all of our employees trained in Title 4 liquor law training. We own and
operate multiple locations throughout Arizona and other States.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Fry's is a great place to shop and pick up all of your needs including adult beverages.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Fry's Food & Drug #96
Liquor License Map - Fry's Food & Drug #96
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 31
Liquor License Data: FRY'S FOOD & DRUG #96
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Liquor Store 9 2 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 2 0
Restaurant 12 18 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 12.81 0.95
Violent Crimes 5.03 0.87 0.31
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 0
Total Violations 93
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6119001 1639 93 % 5% 0%
6123001 2199 54 % 6% 5%
6123002 1266 84 % 46 % 12 %
6123003 1440 69 % 25 % 0%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 32
Liquor License Map: FRY'S FOOD & DRUG #96
26300 N. NORTERRA PKWY
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 33
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070072 and
09070072S.
Summary
Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent
License Type
Series 9 and 9S - Liquor Store with Sampling Privileges
Location
26300 N. Norterra Pkwy.
Zoning Classification: PUD
Council District: 1
This request is for a location transfer of a liquor license and addition of sampling
privileges for a grocery store. This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales
and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 12, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
Page 30
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We have all of our employees trained in Title 4 liquor law training. We own and
operate multiple locations throughout Arizona and other States.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Fry's is a great place to shop and pick up all of your needs including adult beverages.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Fry's Food & Drug #96
Liquor License Map - Fry's Food & Drug #96
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 31
Liquor License Data: FRY'S FOOD & DRUG #96
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Liquor Store 9 2 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 2 0
Restaurant 12 18 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 12.81 0.95
Violent Crimes 5.03 0.87 0.31
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 0
Total Violations 93
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6119001 1639 93 % 5% 0%
6123001 2199 54 % 6% 5%
6123002 1266 84 % 46 % 12 %
6123003 1440 69 % 25 % 0%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 32
Liquor License Map: FRY'S FOOD & DRUG #96
26300 N. NORTERRA PKWY
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 33
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - India Palace
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196680.
Summary
Applicant
Jatinder Dosanjh, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
2941 W. Bell Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 19, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 34
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I, Jatinder Dosanjh, have completed all the necessary training required to have the
liquor lice in my name. I have had over 25+ years of experience working in the
restaurant business in Arizona. I have worked in Arizona since 1994 in the restaurant
business, and at each establishment I have worked, we have sold alcohol. Having the
capacity to run and own my restaurant has been a lifelong dream after decades of
working, and I feel that I am well equipped to operate this establishment with a liquor
license.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“As an Indian Cuisine establishment, we offer liquor that best represents our
communities back in India. We appropriately do this by ensuring that patrons at our
establishment do not overconsume alcohol and that they do it responsibly. We have
beers ar that show our deep-rooted culture and allow Americans from all walks of life
to experience everything from food to drinks. We have the community's best interest at
hand by ensuring we offer a wide variety yet ensure safety and consumption are our
top priority.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - India Palace
Liquor License Map - India Palace
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 35
Liquor License Data: INDIA PALACE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1
Liquor Store 9 2 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 2
Restaurant 12 9 6
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 19.42 25.58
Violent Crimes 5.03 5.89 9.02
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 60
Total Violations 93 109
Page 36
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1036081 2434 69 % 11 % 7%
1042071 1972 85 % 6% 5%
1042072 1463 95 % 11 % 5%
6185001 2076 86 % 7% 5%
6185002 1030 25 % 27 % 22 %
6185003 860 4% 17 % 17 %
6186003 1177 89 % 11 % 24 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 37
Liquor License Map: INDIA PALACE
2941 W BELL RD
Ü
Date: 5/23/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 38
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196680.
Summary
Applicant
Jatinder Dosanjh, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
2941 W. Bell Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 19, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 34
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I, Jatinder Dosanjh, have completed all the necessary training required to have the
liquor lice in my name. I have had over 25+ years of experience working in the
restaurant business in Arizona. I have worked in Arizona since 1994 in the restaurant
business, and at each establishment I have worked, we have sold alcohol. Having the
capacity to run and own my restaurant has been a lifelong dream after decades of
working, and I feel that I am well equipped to operate this establishment with a liquor
license.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“As an Indian Cuisine establishment, we offer liquor that best represents our
communities back in India. We appropriately do this by ensuring that patrons at our
establishment do not overconsume alcohol and that they do it responsibly. We have
beers ar that show our deep-rooted culture and allow Americans from all walks of life
to experience everything from food to drinks. We have the community's best interest at
hand by ensuring we offer a wide variety yet ensure safety and consumption are our
top priority.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - India Palace
Liquor License Map - India Palace
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 35
Liquor License Data: INDIA PALACE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1
Liquor Store 9 2 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 2
Restaurant 12 9 6
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 19.42 25.58
Violent Crimes 5.03 5.89 9.02
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 60
Total Violations 93 109
Page 36
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1036081 2434 69 % 11 % 7%
1042071 1972 85 % 6% 5%
1042072 1463 95 % 11 % 5%
6185001 2076 86 % 7% 5%
6185002 1030 25 % 27 % 22 %
6185003 860 4% 17 % 17 %
6186003 1177 89 % 11 % 24 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 37
Liquor License Map: INDIA PALACE
2941 W BELL RD
Ü
Date: 5/23/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 38
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Taco Boy's
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196374.
Summary
Applicant
Juan Francisco Pena, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
9016 N. Black Canyon Highway
Zoning Classification: PSC and C-2
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently being remodeled with plans to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 4, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
Page 39
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I currently own two restaurant with liquor license I have a clean record with no
violations. The business is a neighbourhood location with many loyal customers who
come to our current locations and request to open taco boys in west side we are
committed to the responsible sales of alcoholic beverages under Arizona liquor laws.
All of our employees are trained in responsible liquor sales we are very strict with our
liquor service policies.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Many of our loyal clientele at our current location request to have alcoholic beverages
at our new locations, in order to please our locals, we ask to be granted a liquor
license which will help us to generate more tax revenue and create jobs in the City of
Phoenix.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Taco Boy's
Liquor License Map - Taco Boy's
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 40
Liquor License Data: TACO BOY'S
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Government 5 1 0
Bar 6 4 3
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 0
Liquor Store 9 2 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2
Hotel 11 2 1
Restaurant 12 20 4
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 68.71 112.10
Violent Crimes 5.03 20.43 19.63
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 40
Total Violations 93 84
Page 41
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1042054 1577 5% 21 % 30 %
1044021 2555 24 % 18 % 15 %
1055011 1055 38 % 6% 59 %
1055012 1442 0% 11 % 38 %
1056011 2072 66 % 5% 23 %
1056022 2457 38 % 23 % 34 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 42
Liquor License Map: TACO BOY'S
9016 N BLACK CANYON HWY
Ü
Date: 5/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 43
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196374.
Summary
Applicant
Juan Francisco Pena, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
9016 N. Black Canyon Highway
Zoning Classification: PSC and C-2
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently being remodeled with plans to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 4, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
Page 39
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I currently own two restaurant with liquor license I have a clean record with no
violations. The business is a neighbourhood location with many loyal customers who
come to our current locations and request to open taco boys in west side we are
committed to the responsible sales of alcoholic beverages under Arizona liquor laws.
All of our employees are trained in responsible liquor sales we are very strict with our
liquor service policies.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Many of our loyal clientele at our current location request to have alcoholic beverages
at our new locations, in order to please our locals, we ask to be granted a liquor
license which will help us to generate more tax revenue and create jobs in the City of
Phoenix.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Taco Boy's
Liquor License Map - Taco Boy's
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 40
Liquor License Data: TACO BOY'S
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Government 5 1 0
Bar 6 4 3
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 0
Liquor Store 9 2 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2
Hotel 11 2 1
Restaurant 12 20 4
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 68.71 112.10
Violent Crimes 5.03 20.43 19.63
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 40
Total Violations 93 84
Page 41
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1042054 1577 5% 21 % 30 %
1044021 2555 24 % 18 % 15 %
1055011 1055 38 % 6% 59 %
1055012 1442 0% 11 % 38 %
1056011 2072 66 % 5% 23 %
1056022 2457 38 % 23 % 34 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 42
Liquor License Map: TACO BOY'S
9016 N BLACK CANYON HWY
Ü
Date: 5/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 43
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Smoke Zone Beer & Wine
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196829.
Summary
Applicant
Martel Delly, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
18403 N. 19th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a liquor store. This location is currently
licensed for liquor sales with a Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store liquor license.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 9, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 44
Smoke Zone Beer & Wine (Series 10)
18403 N. 19th Ave., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 5
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have owned this location since 2019. I have had no violations of any kind. I have
also been thru basic and management training.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I am upgrading my license to a series 9 to offer more variety to my neighbors who
have who have requested it.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Smoke Zone Beer & Wine
Liquor License Map - Smoke Zone Beer & Wine
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 45
Liquor License Data: SMOKE ZONE BEER & WINE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 3 0
Liquor Store 9 6 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 11 4
Restaurant 12 3 2
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 50.37 18.68
Violent Crimes 5.03 8.33 5.20
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 108
Total Violations 93 210
Page 46
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6165003 1763 75 % 16 % 5%
6166002 1144 73 % 3% 4%
6166004 1427 89 % 3% 4%
6186001 1474 89 % 8% 17 %
6186002 1570 20 % 22 % 43 %
6186003 1177 89 % 11 % 24 %
6187001 1478 79 % 7% 13 %
6187002 1468 61 % 7% 20 %
6188001 893 63 % 6% 18 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 47
Liquor License Map: SMOKE ZONE BEER & WINE
18403 N 19TH AVE
Ü
Date: 5/12/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 48
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196829.
Summary
Applicant
Martel Delly, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
18403 N. 19th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a liquor store. This location is currently
licensed for liquor sales with a Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store liquor license.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 9, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 44
Smoke Zone Beer & Wine (Series 10)
18403 N. 19th Ave., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 5
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have owned this location since 2019. I have had no violations of any kind. I have
also been thru basic and management training.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I am upgrading my license to a series 9 to offer more variety to my neighbors who
have who have requested it.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Smoke Zone Beer & Wine
Liquor License Map - Smoke Zone Beer & Wine
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 45
Liquor License Data: SMOKE ZONE BEER & WINE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 3 0
Liquor Store 9 6 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 11 4
Restaurant 12 3 2
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 50.37 18.68
Violent Crimes 5.03 8.33 5.20
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 108
Total Violations 93 210
Page 46
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6165003 1763 75 % 16 % 5%
6166002 1144 73 % 3% 4%
6166004 1427 89 % 3% 4%
6186001 1474 89 % 8% 17 %
6186002 1570 20 % 22 % 43 %
6186003 1177 89 % 11 % 24 %
6187001 1478 79 % 7% 13 %
6187002 1468 61 % 7% 20 %
6188001 893 63 % 6% 18 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 47
Liquor License Map: SMOKE ZONE BEER & WINE
18403 N 19TH AVE
Ü
Date: 5/12/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 48
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - New York Bagels 'N Bialys
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196557.
Summary
Applicant
Ruth Leatherman, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4722 E. Cactus Road
Zoning Classification: PSC PCD
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
has plans to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 12, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 49
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
New York Bagels 'N Bialys (Series 12)
10320 N. Scottsdale Road, Ste. 400B, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
New York Bagels 'N Bialys (Series 12)
1455 N. Scottsdale Road, Ste. 110, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
New York Bagels 'N Bialys (Series 12)
8876 E. Pinnacle Peak Road, Ste. 100, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We already have 3 locations with liqour licences. I have recently gone through all the
necessary training again to requalify to hold the licences. We are good operators with
no issues.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are a locally owned and operated breakfast and lunch with three curent locations.
We have been serving the community with fresh bagels, bialys and deli items since
2005.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Page 50
Attachments
Liquor License Data - New York Bagels 'N Bialys
Liquor License Map - New York Bagels 'N Bialys
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 51
Liquor License Data: NEW YORK BAGELS 'N BIALYS
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 3 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 5 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2
Hotel 11 1 1
Restaurant 12 23 17
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 26.99 83.54
Violent Crimes 5.03 2.83 5.20
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 30
Total Violations 93 46
Page 52
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1032051 1834 100 % 6% 0%
1032052 1192 82 % 0% 16 %
1032082 1548 38 % 36 % 18 %
1032083 885 93 % 10 % 0%
1032091 804 74 % 0% 24 %
1032092 970 69 % 24 % 27 %
1032101 872 20 % 20 % 12 %
1032102 1681 32 % 14 % 19 %
1032106 886 23 % 22 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 53
Liquor License Map: NEW YORK BAGELS 'N BIALYS
4722 E CACTUS RD
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 54
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196557.
Summary
Applicant
Ruth Leatherman, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4722 E. Cactus Road
Zoning Classification: PSC PCD
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
has plans to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 12, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 49
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
New York Bagels 'N Bialys (Series 12)
10320 N. Scottsdale Road, Ste. 400B, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
New York Bagels 'N Bialys (Series 12)
1455 N. Scottsdale Road, Ste. 110, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
New York Bagels 'N Bialys (Series 12)
8876 E. Pinnacle Peak Road, Ste. 100, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We already have 3 locations with liqour licences. I have recently gone through all the
necessary training again to requalify to hold the licences. We are good operators with
no issues.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are a locally owned and operated breakfast and lunch with three curent locations.
We have been serving the community with fresh bagels, bialys and deli items since
2005.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Page 50
Attachments
Liquor License Data - New York Bagels 'N Bialys
Liquor License Map - New York Bagels 'N Bialys
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 51
Liquor License Data: NEW YORK BAGELS 'N BIALYS
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 3 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 5 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2
Hotel 11 1 1
Restaurant 12 23 17
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 26.99 83.54
Violent Crimes 5.03 2.83 5.20
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 30
Total Violations 93 46
Page 52
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1032051 1834 100 % 6% 0%
1032052 1192 82 % 0% 16 %
1032082 1548 38 % 36 % 18 %
1032083 885 93 % 10 % 0%
1032091 804 74 % 0% 24 %
1032092 970 69 % 24 % 27 %
1032101 872 20 % 20 % 12 %
1032102 1681 32 % 14 % 19 %
1032106 886 23 % 22 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 53
Liquor License Map: NEW YORK BAGELS 'N BIALYS
4722 E CACTUS RD
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 54
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Biscuits Cafe
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197025.
Summary
Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
310 E. Bell Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 16, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Page 55
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Own and operate several locations throughout the valley. Will ensure employees
abide by Title 4 liquor law training class.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We will make sure we offer our patrons an amazing dining experience.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Biscuits Cafe
Liquor License Map - Biscuits Cafe
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 56
Liquor License Data: BISCUITS CAFE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 1
Liquor Store 9 6 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 4
Restaurant 12 21 18
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 30.75 68.36
Violent Crimes 5.03 7.19 14.11
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 42
Total Violations 93 95
Page 57
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1036043 1058 42 % 16 % 4%
1036111 1396 66 % 14 % 3%
1036121 649 0% 41 % 18 %
1036123 1542 94 % 8% 0%
1036124 1189 0% 19 % 32 %
6189001 1603 54 % 10 % 6%
6189002 1451 82 % 0% 28 %
6189004 1183 83 % 15 % 1%
6189005 1013 0% 37 % 22 %
6191001 2198 0% 11 % 23 %
6191002 617 22 % 45 % 19 %
6192002 1223 0% 15 % 29 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 58
Liquor License Map: BISCUITS CAFE
310 E BELL RD
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 59
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197025.
Summary
Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
310 E. Bell Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 16, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Page 55
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Own and operate several locations throughout the valley. Will ensure employees
abide by Title 4 liquor law training class.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We will make sure we offer our patrons an amazing dining experience.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Biscuits Cafe
Liquor License Map - Biscuits Cafe
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 56
Liquor License Data: BISCUITS CAFE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 1
Liquor Store 9 6 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 4
Restaurant 12 21 18
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 30.75 68.36
Violent Crimes 5.03 7.19 14.11
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 42
Total Violations 93 95
Page 57
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1036043 1058 42 % 16 % 4%
1036111 1396 66 % 14 % 3%
1036121 649 0% 41 % 18 %
1036123 1542 94 % 8% 0%
1036124 1189 0% 19 % 32 %
6189001 1603 54 % 10 % 6%
6189002 1451 82 % 0% 28 %
6189004 1183 83 % 15 % 1%
6189005 1013 0% 37 % 22 %
6191001 2198 0% 11 % 23 %
6191002 617 22 % 45 % 19 %
6192002 1223 0% 15 % 29 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 58
Liquor License Map: BISCUITS CAFE
310 E BELL RD
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 59
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Casa Amigos Food
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070732.
Summary
Applicant
Surjit Bola, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
3641 N. 43rd Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 4
This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a liquor
store. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 3, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
Page 60
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have experience in this retail liquor business since 2006. I am very responsible and
respectful of liquor laws and do my very best to follow and educate myself and
employees to prevent sale to underage and intoxicated customer's in a respectful
manner.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 61
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070732.
Summary
Applicant
Surjit Bola, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
3641 N. 43rd Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 4
This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a liquor
store. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 3, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
Page 60
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have experience in this retail liquor business since 2006. I am very responsible and
respectful of liquor laws and do my very best to follow and educate myself and
employees to prevent sale to underage and intoxicated customer's in a respectful
manner.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 61
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - GreenTree Hotel
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 198219.
Summary
Applicant
Kevin Kramber, Agent
License Type
Series 11 - Hotel/Motel
Location
1500 N. 51st Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a hotel. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 23, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 62
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
GreenTree Inn & Suites (Series 11)
240 W. Hwy. 287, Florence
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am currently agent on over 200+ licenses statewide. Managers on file has required
Title IV Training. All controlling persons and managers will have cleared backgrounds.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This is an application for a series 11, Hotel/Motel, liquor license where by we want to
offer our guests of legal drinking age to enjoy adult beverage with and to compliment
their meal and stay. We will maintain the required minimum 40 percent food sales.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - GreenTree Hotel
Liquor License Map - GreenTree Hotel
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 63
Liquor License Data: GREENTREE HOTEL
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Wholesaler 4 14 2
Bar 6 2 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1
Liquor Store 9 3 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 3
Hotel 11 1 1
Restaurant 12 3 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 34.95 68.15
Violent Crimes 5.03 18.71 43.63
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 135
Total Violations 93 238
Page 64
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1123012 2098 68 % 7% 47 %
1123013 1748 71 % 0% 13 %
1124021 1777 93 % 11 % 31 %
1124022 1531 76 % 21 % 27 %
1124023 1203 68 % 17 % 35 %
1125071 760 40 % 40 % 36 %
1125072 1489 2% 11 % 57 %
1125121 1518 14 % 36 % 22 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 65
Liquor License Map: GREENTREE HOTEL
1500 N 51ST AVE
Ü
Date: 5/26/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 66
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 198219.
Summary
Applicant
Kevin Kramber, Agent
License Type
Series 11 - Hotel/Motel
Location
1500 N. 51st Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a hotel. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 23, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 62
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
GreenTree Inn & Suites (Series 11)
240 W. Hwy. 287, Florence
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am currently agent on over 200+ licenses statewide. Managers on file has required
Title IV Training. All controlling persons and managers will have cleared backgrounds.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This is an application for a series 11, Hotel/Motel, liquor license where by we want to
offer our guests of legal drinking age to enjoy adult beverage with and to compliment
their meal and stay. We will maintain the required minimum 40 percent food sales.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - GreenTree Hotel
Liquor License Map - GreenTree Hotel
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 63
Liquor License Data: GREENTREE HOTEL
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Wholesaler 4 14 2
Bar 6 2 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1
Liquor Store 9 3 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 3
Hotel 11 1 1
Restaurant 12 3 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 34.95 68.15
Violent Crimes 5.03 18.71 43.63
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 135
Total Violations 93 238
Page 64
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1123012 2098 68 % 7% 47 %
1123013 1748 71 % 0% 13 %
1124021 1777 93 % 11 % 31 %
1124022 1531 76 % 21 % 27 %
1124023 1203 68 % 17 % 35 %
1125071 760 40 % 40 % 36 %
1125072 1489 2% 11 % 57 %
1125121 1518 14 % 36 % 22 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 65
Liquor License Map: GREENTREE HOTEL
1500 N 51ST AVE
Ü
Date: 5/26/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 66
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - The Johnny O Alzheimer's, Dementia and TBI
Awareness Foundation
Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.
Summary
Applicant
Mark Oravitz
Location
4344 W. Indian School Road, Ste. 100
Council District: 5
Function
Concert and Dance
Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
July 23, 2022 - 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 500 attendees
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 67
Report
Awareness Foundation
Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.
Summary
Applicant
Mark Oravitz
Location
4344 W. Indian School Road, Ste. 100
Council District: 5
Function
Concert and Dance
Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
July 23, 2022 - 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 500 attendees
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 67
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Taco Boy's
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196373.
Summary
Applicant
Juan Cornejo Pena, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
9055 W. Camelback Road
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 5
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location requires a
Use Permit to allow alcohol sales as an accessory use. This business is currently
being remodeled with plans to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 4, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
Page 68
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I currently own two restaurant with liquor license I have a clean record with no
violations. This bussiness is a neighbourhood location with many loyal customers who
come to our current locations and request to open Taco Boys in west side we are
committed to the responsible sales of alcoholic beverages under Arizona Liqour Laws.
All of our employees are trained in responsible liquor sales we are very strict with our
liquor service policies.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Many of our loyal clientele at our current location request to have alcoholic beverages
at our new locations. In order to please our locals, we ask to be granted a liquor
license which will help us to generate more tax revenue and create jobs in the City of
Phoenix.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Taco Boy's
Liquor License Map - Taco Boy's
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 69
Page 70
Liquor License Map: TACO BOY'S
9055 W CAMELBACK RD
Ü
Date: 5/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 71
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196373.
Summary
Applicant
Juan Cornejo Pena, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
9055 W. Camelback Road
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 5
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location requires a
Use Permit to allow alcohol sales as an accessory use. This business is currently
being remodeled with plans to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 4, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
Page 68
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I currently own two restaurant with liquor license I have a clean record with no
violations. This bussiness is a neighbourhood location with many loyal customers who
come to our current locations and request to open Taco Boys in west side we are
committed to the responsible sales of alcoholic beverages under Arizona Liqour Laws.
All of our employees are trained in responsible liquor sales we are very strict with our
liquor service policies.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Many of our loyal clientele at our current location request to have alcoholic beverages
at our new locations. In order to please our locals, we ask to be granted a liquor
license which will help us to generate more tax revenue and create jobs in the City of
Phoenix.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Taco Boy's
Liquor License Map - Taco Boy's
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 69
Page 70
Liquor License Map: TACO BOY'S
9055 W CAMELBACK RD
Ü
Date: 5/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 71
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Family Dollar #25127
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 187792.
Summary
Applicant
Carlos Favela, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
7421 W. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 16, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
Page 72
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am over the age of 21 (32) will obtain, or have obtained, the required training set
forth at A.R.S Section 4-112(g) and R19-1-103. In addition, will ensure that I and any
employee authorized to conduct a retail sale will comply with the mandatory training
requirements and will conduct all sales in compliance with the applicable rules and
regulations of the State of Arizona and any applicable local regulations.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Family Dollar provides a quality retail option to the neighborhoods in which the store is
located. By providing an option for a consumer to purchase (off-sale) retail alcohol, the
consumer is provided a safe, secure and convenient location to make beer and wine
purchases. All sales will be conducted in strict compliance with all applicable rules and
regulations, including mandatory training for all managers and for employees making
sale.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Family Dollar #25127
Liquor License Map - Family Dollar #25127
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 73
Liquor License Data: FAMILY DOLLAR #25127
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 3
Restaurant 12 9 3
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 59.02 48.30
Violent Crimes 5.03 25.39 24.84
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 291
Total Violations 93 532
Page 74
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1096021 1392 71 % 14 % 35 %
1096022 3064 27 % 20 % 41 %
1096023 1946 79 % 0% 22 %
1096031 852 79 % 11 % 3%
1096034 1269 66 % 0% 17 %
1097012 1978 48 % 28 % 49 %
1097014 2074 0% 17 % 37 %
1097031 1232 68 % 0% 29 %
1097032 1653 33 % 12 % 31 %
1097041 1602 68 % 5% 35 %
1097042 784 71 % 19 % 15 %
1097052 1084 78 % 0% 15 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 75
Liquor License Map: FAMILY DOLLAR #25127
7421 W INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 76
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 187792.
Summary
Applicant
Carlos Favela, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
7421 W. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 16, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
Page 72
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am over the age of 21 (32) will obtain, or have obtained, the required training set
forth at A.R.S Section 4-112(g) and R19-1-103. In addition, will ensure that I and any
employee authorized to conduct a retail sale will comply with the mandatory training
requirements and will conduct all sales in compliance with the applicable rules and
regulations of the State of Arizona and any applicable local regulations.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Family Dollar provides a quality retail option to the neighborhoods in which the store is
located. By providing an option for a consumer to purchase (off-sale) retail alcohol, the
consumer is provided a safe, secure and convenient location to make beer and wine
purchases. All sales will be conducted in strict compliance with all applicable rules and
regulations, including mandatory training for all managers and for employees making
sale.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Family Dollar #25127
Liquor License Map - Family Dollar #25127
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 73
Liquor License Data: FAMILY DOLLAR #25127
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 3
Restaurant 12 9 3
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 59.02 48.30
Violent Crimes 5.03 25.39 24.84
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 291
Total Violations 93 532
Page 74
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1096021 1392 71 % 14 % 35 %
1096022 3064 27 % 20 % 41 %
1096023 1946 79 % 0% 22 %
1096031 852 79 % 11 % 3%
1096034 1269 66 % 0% 17 %
1097012 1978 48 % 28 % 49 %
1097014 2074 0% 17 % 37 %
1097031 1232 68 % 0% 29 %
1097032 1653 33 % 12 % 31 %
1097041 1602 68 % 5% 35 %
1097042 784 71 % 19 % 15 %
1097052 1084 78 % 0% 15 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 75
Liquor License Map: FAMILY DOLLAR #25127
7421 W INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 76
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - DashMart
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 195187.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
2330 W. Bethany Home Road, Ste.110
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit. This location requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 5, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 77
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
DashMart (Series 10)
14131 N. Rio Vista Blvd., Ste. 3, Peoria
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
DashMart (Series 9)
2414 W. 14th St., Ste. 2414A, Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
DashMart (Series 10)
3512 E. Southern Ave., Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Applicant offers direct delivery of snacks, drinks, personal essentials and a variety of
convenience items, and would like to offer customers 21 and over the opportunity to
purchase beer and wine.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
Page 78
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - DashMart
Liquor License Map - DashMart
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 79
Liquor License Data: DASHMART
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 5 2
Liquor Store 9 7 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 14 5
Hotel 11 1 0
Restaurant 12 5 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 99.68 61.78
Violent Crimes 5.03 28.23 38.11
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 163
Total Violations 93 291
Page 80
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1068012 1670 5% 28 % 55 %
1068013 1083 30 % 20 % 33 %
1068021 1099 60 % 0% 9%
1068022 1105 85 % 21 % 1%
1068023 1633 17 % 17 % 34 %
1069002 2629 71 % 5% 22 %
1072022 2085 62 % 5% 22 %
1073001 2203 79 % 3% 6%
1073004 2614 23 % 5% 31 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 81
Liquor License Map: DASHMART
2330 W BETHANY HOME RD
Ü
Date: 5/10/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 82
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 195187.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
2330 W. Bethany Home Road, Ste.110
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit. This location requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 5, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 77
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
DashMart (Series 10)
14131 N. Rio Vista Blvd., Ste. 3, Peoria
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
DashMart (Series 9)
2414 W. 14th St., Ste. 2414A, Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
DashMart (Series 10)
3512 E. Southern Ave., Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Applicant offers direct delivery of snacks, drinks, personal essentials and a variety of
convenience items, and would like to offer customers 21 and over the opportunity to
purchase beer and wine.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
Page 78
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - DashMart
Liquor License Map - DashMart
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 79
Liquor License Data: DASHMART
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 5 2
Liquor Store 9 7 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 14 5
Hotel 11 1 0
Restaurant 12 5 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 99.68 61.78
Violent Crimes 5.03 28.23 38.11
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 163
Total Violations 93 291
Page 80
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1068012 1670 5% 28 % 55 %
1068013 1083 30 % 20 % 33 %
1068021 1099 60 % 0% 9%
1068022 1105 85 % 21 % 1%
1068023 1633 17 % 17 % 34 %
1069002 2629 71 % 5% 22 %
1072022 2085 62 % 5% 22 %
1073001 2203 79 % 3% 6%
1073004 2614 23 % 5% 31 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 81
Liquor License Map: DASHMART
2330 W BETHANY HOME RD
Ü
Date: 5/10/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 82
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Mr. Chao's Asia Bistro
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 184782.
Summary
Applicant
Daniel Chiao, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4232 E. Chandler Blvd., Ste. 4
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 8, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 83
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a responsible business owner and will obtain proper training.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"Our customers request alcohol from our restaurant. All our customers reside within
10 miles.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Mr. Chao's Asia Bistro
Liquor License Map - Mr. Chao's Asia Bistro
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 84
Liquor License Data: MR. CHAO'S ASIA BISTRO
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 2
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 9 4
Restaurant 12 21 9
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 11.73 26.11
Violent Crimes 5.03 3.55 5.41
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 10
Total Violations 93 18
Page 85
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1167121 2721 19 % 15 % 9%
1167122 1832 76 % 0% 3%
1167131 589 64 % 51 % 42 %
1167191 1679 87 % 3% 2%
1167193 1688 72 % 17 % 14 %
1167194 2185 77 % 0% 4%
1167202 1687 44 % 7% 7%
1167203 1430 34 % 7% 5%
1167212 1820 65 % 4% 3%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 86
Liquor License Map: MR. CHAO'S ASIA BISTRO
4232 E CHANDLER BLVD
Ü
Date: 5/10/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 87
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 184782.
Summary
Applicant
Daniel Chiao, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4232 E. Chandler Blvd., Ste. 4
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 8, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 83
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a responsible business owner and will obtain proper training.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"Our customers request alcohol from our restaurant. All our customers reside within
10 miles.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Mr. Chao's Asia Bistro
Liquor License Map - Mr. Chao's Asia Bistro
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 84
Liquor License Data: MR. CHAO'S ASIA BISTRO
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 2
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 9 4
Restaurant 12 21 9
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 11.73 26.11
Violent Crimes 5.03 3.55 5.41
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 10
Total Violations 93 18
Page 85
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1167121 2721 19 % 15 % 9%
1167122 1832 76 % 0% 3%
1167131 589 64 % 51 % 42 %
1167191 1679 87 % 3% 2%
1167193 1688 72 % 17 % 14 %
1167194 2185 77 % 0% 4%
1167202 1687 44 % 7% 7%
1167203 1430 34 % 7% 5%
1167212 1820 65 % 4% 3%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 86
Liquor License Map: MR. CHAO'S ASIA BISTRO
4232 E CHANDLER BLVD
Ü
Date: 5/10/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 87
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Castaway
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 06070608.
Summary
Applicant
Greg Field, Agent
License Type
Series 6 - Bar
Location
5110 E. McDowell Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a bar. This
location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 5, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Giligin's (Series 6)
4251 N. Winfield Scott Plaza, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Page 88
Liquor license violations: None
Grubstake (Series 7 & Series 12)
725 N. Central, Quartzsite
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been in the liquor industry for over 32 years, as an owner and operator. My
family and I own three restaurant and bars, one will be 27 years in August located in
Old Town Scottsdale. Castaway's in Phoenix will be 10 years in July. Grubstake in
Quartzite is 21 years. I've operated these establishments with No violations from State
or City and with minimal calls for service from fire or police. All three places have and
will continue to be family run. Acquisition and agent change for this license was
mutually decided because of the ages of my parents who can no longer fulfill daily
operations.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 89
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 06070608.
Summary
Applicant
Greg Field, Agent
License Type
Series 6 - Bar
Location
5110 E. McDowell Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a bar. This
location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 5, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Giligin's (Series 6)
4251 N. Winfield Scott Plaza, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Page 88
Liquor license violations: None
Grubstake (Series 7 & Series 12)
725 N. Central, Quartzsite
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been in the liquor industry for over 32 years, as an owner and operator. My
family and I own three restaurant and bars, one will be 27 years in August located in
Old Town Scottsdale. Castaway's in Phoenix will be 10 years in July. Grubstake in
Quartzite is 21 years. I've operated these establishments with No violations from State
or City and with minimal calls for service from fire or police. All three places have and
will continue to be family run. Acquisition and agent change for this license was
mutually decided because of the ages of my parents who can no longer fulfill daily
operations.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 89
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - 24th Street Cigar Lounge
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 06070570.
Summary
Applicant
Gewarges Janko, Agent
License Type
Series 6 - Bar
Location
3407 N. 24th St.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a bar. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales with a Series 9 - Liquor Store, liquor
license and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 24, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Page 90
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been operating this location for many years. I am a responsible owner who
follows all laws, rules and ordinances.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“With this added convenience, patrons will now have the option to enjoy a cigar with an
adult beverage in a relaxing atmosphere."
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - 24th Street Cigar Lounge
Liquor License Map - 24th Street Cigar Lounge
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 91
Liquor License Data: 24TH STREET CIGAR LOUNGE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 6 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 2
Liquor Store 9 5 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 9 1
Restaurant 12 15 3
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 13.56 1.06
Violent Crimes 10.06 3.60 1.27
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 78
Total Violations 94 133
Page 92
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1084003 1071 34 % 8% 40 %
1085021 743 50 % 29 % 20 %
1107021 1972 58 % 0% 30 %
1107022 2172 32 % 20 % 32 %
1108011 1736 56 % 27 % 40 %
1108012 1115 19 % 30 % 33 %
1108021 948 75 % 27 % 13 %
1108022 1168 33 % 16 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 93
Liquor License Map: 24TH STREET CIGAR LOUNGE
3407 N 24TH ST
Ü
Date: 5/26/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 94
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 06070570.
Summary
Applicant
Gewarges Janko, Agent
License Type
Series 6 - Bar
Location
3407 N. 24th St.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a bar. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales with a Series 9 - Liquor Store, liquor
license and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 24, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Page 90
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been operating this location for many years. I am a responsible owner who
follows all laws, rules and ordinances.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“With this added convenience, patrons will now have the option to enjoy a cigar with an
adult beverage in a relaxing atmosphere."
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - 24th Street Cigar Lounge
Liquor License Map - 24th Street Cigar Lounge
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 91
Liquor License Data: 24TH STREET CIGAR LOUNGE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 6 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 2
Liquor Store 9 5 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 9 1
Restaurant 12 15 3
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 13.56 1.06
Violent Crimes 10.06 3.60 1.27
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 78
Total Violations 94 133
Page 92
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1084003 1071 34 % 8% 40 %
1085021 743 50 % 29 % 20 %
1107021 1972 58 % 0% 30 %
1107022 2172 32 % 20 % 32 %
1108011 1736 56 % 27 % 40 %
1108012 1115 19 % 30 % 33 %
1108021 948 75 % 27 % 13 %
1108022 1168 33 % 16 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 93
Liquor License Map: 24TH STREET CIGAR LOUNGE
3407 N 24TH ST
Ü
Date: 5/26/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 94
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Taste of Thai
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196721.
Summary
Applicant
Artichar Reynolds, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
3738 E. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 18, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 95
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Taste of Thai (Series 12)
4855 E. Warner Road, #16, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 68
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a good citizen. I followed all of the state of Arizona and city of Phoenix rules to
obtain a Liquor license. I also hold a liquor license at Taste of Thai (Ahwatukee) first
location. We serve our community.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Taste of Thai restaurant and our employee have the best interest to serve to our
community. We will bring more job to the community responsibility.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Taste of Thai
Liquor License Map - Taste of Thai
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 96
Liquor License Data: TASTE OF THAI
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Bar 6 5 3
Beer and Wine Bar 7 6 1
Liquor Store 9 2 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2
Restaurant 12 39 13
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 18.81 20.59
Violent Crimes 5.03 5.57 4.45
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 70
Total Violations 93 105
Page 97
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1082003 1225 76 % 13 % 17 %
1083013 982 75 % 18 % 1%
1083021 1229 70 % 16 % 3%
1083022 1824 50 % 13 % 4%
1109011 665 96 % 10 % 13 %
1109021 2609 33 % 21 % 40 %
1109022 2224 39 % 7% 18 %
1110001 781 25 % 11 % 3%
1110002 1105 63 % 8% 19 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 98
Liquor License Map: TASTE OF THAI
3738 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Ü
Date: 5/23/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 99
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196721.
Summary
Applicant
Artichar Reynolds, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
3738 E. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 18, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 95
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Taste of Thai (Series 12)
4855 E. Warner Road, #16, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 68
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a good citizen. I followed all of the state of Arizona and city of Phoenix rules to
obtain a Liquor license. I also hold a liquor license at Taste of Thai (Ahwatukee) first
location. We serve our community.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Taste of Thai restaurant and our employee have the best interest to serve to our
community. We will bring more job to the community responsibility.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Taste of Thai
Liquor License Map - Taste of Thai
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 96
Liquor License Data: TASTE OF THAI
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Bar 6 5 3
Beer and Wine Bar 7 6 1
Liquor Store 9 2 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2
Restaurant 12 39 13
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 18.81 20.59
Violent Crimes 5.03 5.57 4.45
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 70
Total Violations 93 105
Page 97
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1082003 1225 76 % 13 % 17 %
1083013 982 75 % 18 % 1%
1083021 1229 70 % 16 % 3%
1083022 1824 50 % 13 % 4%
1109011 665 96 % 10 % 13 %
1109021 2609 33 % 21 % 40 %
1109022 2224 39 % 7% 18 %
1110001 781 25 % 11 % 3%
1110002 1105 63 % 8% 19 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 98
Liquor License Map: TASTE OF THAI
3738 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Ü
Date: 5/23/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 99
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - The Bread and Honey House
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196446.
Summary
Applicant
Theresa Morse, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4801 E. Indian School Road, Ste. 4
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
has plans to open in June 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 25, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 100
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“My wife and I have owned and operated two restaurants over the past 2 years. I was
an executive chef at two City of Phoenix liquor license locations and one Scottsdale
location. I created the restaurant menus for all three locations. My wife and I as well as
employees will attend AZ liquor law training to identify obvious intoxication, underage
and be familiar with all state and City laws. Our restaurants are family oriented
specifically to enjoy our homemade authentic Mexican food. We are excited to have
businesses in the City of Phoenix.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location has been open to the public since June of 2021. We have continued to
serve our customers even during the pandemic. We often cater to businesses at our
location but understand that the liquor license is public and must remain open to other
guests. Many of our clientel have inquired about our business serving alcohol
beverages. After one year of operation at this location we decided to apply for a
restaurant liquor license to compliment the service of food. We do not have a bar and
will remain a restaurant.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - The Bread and Honey House
Liquor License Map - The Bread and Honey House
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 101
Liquor License Data: THE BREAD AND HONEY HOUSE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 1
Wholesaler 4 1 1
Bar 6 5 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 0
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 3 0
Restaurant 12 16 3
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 11.62 12.31
Violent Crimes 5.03 3.15 2.22
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 35
Total Violations 93 63
Page 102
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1080001 1436 93 % 3% 12 %
1081001 1849 78 % 1% 7%
1082002 1178 45 % 8% 8%
1110004 707 59 % 25 % 0%
1110005 698 88 % 19 % 5%
1111003 2317 84 % 11 % 8%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 103
Liquor License Map: THE BREAD AND HONEY HOUSE
4801 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Ü
Date: 5/26/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 104
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196446.
Summary
Applicant
Theresa Morse, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4801 E. Indian School Road, Ste. 4
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
has plans to open in June 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 25, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 100
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“My wife and I have owned and operated two restaurants over the past 2 years. I was
an executive chef at two City of Phoenix liquor license locations and one Scottsdale
location. I created the restaurant menus for all three locations. My wife and I as well as
employees will attend AZ liquor law training to identify obvious intoxication, underage
and be familiar with all state and City laws. Our restaurants are family oriented
specifically to enjoy our homemade authentic Mexican food. We are excited to have
businesses in the City of Phoenix.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location has been open to the public since June of 2021. We have continued to
serve our customers even during the pandemic. We often cater to businesses at our
location but understand that the liquor license is public and must remain open to other
guests. Many of our clientel have inquired about our business serving alcohol
beverages. After one year of operation at this location we decided to apply for a
restaurant liquor license to compliment the service of food. We do not have a bar and
will remain a restaurant.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - The Bread and Honey House
Liquor License Map - The Bread and Honey House
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 101
Liquor License Data: THE BREAD AND HONEY HOUSE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 1
Wholesaler 4 1 1
Bar 6 5 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 0
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 3 0
Restaurant 12 16 3
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 11.62 12.31
Violent Crimes 5.03 3.15 2.22
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 35
Total Violations 93 63
Page 102
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1080001 1436 93 % 3% 12 %
1081001 1849 78 % 1% 7%
1082002 1178 45 % 8% 8%
1110004 707 59 % 25 % 0%
1110005 698 88 % 19 % 5%
1111003 2317 84 % 11 % 8%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 103
Liquor License Map: THE BREAD AND HONEY HOUSE
4801 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Ü
Date: 5/26/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 104
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Eatery
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196949.
Summary
Applicant
Trent Robertson, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
3820 E. Ray Road, Ste. 30
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business is
currently being remodeled with plans to open in September 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 5, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 105
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Vine Tavern & Eatery (Series 6)
801 E. Apache Blvd., Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Vine Tavern & Eatery (Series 12)
975 E. Elliot Road, Ste. A1, Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have operated multiple successful restaurants in the U.S. with no violations or any
issues. My company has policies in place to ensure State laws are properly executed.
We are aware of AZ liquor laws and will take every measure necessary to abide by the
rules of the State and City.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“To the City of Phoenix Council:
A brief history of the Vine Tavern & Eatery: The original Vine (as a pub only) opened in
1970 in Iowa City, in the heart of downtown Iowa City - home of the University of Iowa
Hawkeyes. A few years later the Vine moved to its current location in Iowa City, the
bottom floor of a historical brick building built in 1907. I purchased the Vine and the
building in 1983, added a full service kitchen and changed the name to Vine Tavern &
Page 106
Eatery. In 2013, the building was fully restored in accordance with the Historical
Society. Today, there are 12 sought-after studio apartments above the restaurant.
The next Vine Tavern opened in Arizona near the Arizona State University campus.
This location is also in a very unique building and is very popular with the students and
ASU fans. Our second Arizona location opened in 1992 on the corner of Rural and
Elliot, in Tempe. This location has been a family-friendly, neighborhood go-to location
for many years. Our fourth Vine Tavern opened in Iowa in 1998. This is a large, two-
story building that is walking distance to the Iowa Hawkeye sporting events.
We pride ourselves in being family friendly and supporting of the neighborhoods in
which the restaurants are located. While we are known for our wings (18 flavors!), the
menu offers a wide range from appetizers to full dinner entrees. The Vine is also a
wonderful place to gather and watch sporting events and cheer for our favorite teams
on our 25+ televisions.
I firmly believe opening a Vine Tavern & Eatery in the Ahwatukee area of Phoenix will
fill a void with an affordable, family friendly, full service restaurant.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Vine Tavern & Eatery
Liquor License Map - Vine Tavern & Eatery
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 107
Liquor License Data: VINE TAVERN & EATERY
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 0
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 3 0
Restaurant 12 7 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 41.69 16.77
Violent Crimes 10.06 2.86 1.16
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 0
Total Violations 94
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1167103 1352 91 % 17 % 1%
1167201 1087 75 % 6% 4%
1167202 1687 44 % 7% 7%
1167203 1430 34 % 7% 5%
1167212 1820 65 % 4% 3%
1167293 1007 98 % 0% 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 108
Liquor License Map: VINE TAVERN & EATERY
3820 E RAY RD
Ü
Date: 6/8/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 109
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196949.
Summary
Applicant
Trent Robertson, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
3820 E. Ray Road, Ste. 30
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business is
currently being remodeled with plans to open in September 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 5, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 105
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Vine Tavern & Eatery (Series 6)
801 E. Apache Blvd., Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Vine Tavern & Eatery (Series 12)
975 E. Elliot Road, Ste. A1, Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have operated multiple successful restaurants in the U.S. with no violations or any
issues. My company has policies in place to ensure State laws are properly executed.
We are aware of AZ liquor laws and will take every measure necessary to abide by the
rules of the State and City.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“To the City of Phoenix Council:
A brief history of the Vine Tavern & Eatery: The original Vine (as a pub only) opened in
1970 in Iowa City, in the heart of downtown Iowa City - home of the University of Iowa
Hawkeyes. A few years later the Vine moved to its current location in Iowa City, the
bottom floor of a historical brick building built in 1907. I purchased the Vine and the
building in 1983, added a full service kitchen and changed the name to Vine Tavern &
Page 106
Eatery. In 2013, the building was fully restored in accordance with the Historical
Society. Today, there are 12 sought-after studio apartments above the restaurant.
The next Vine Tavern opened in Arizona near the Arizona State University campus.
This location is also in a very unique building and is very popular with the students and
ASU fans. Our second Arizona location opened in 1992 on the corner of Rural and
Elliot, in Tempe. This location has been a family-friendly, neighborhood go-to location
for many years. Our fourth Vine Tavern opened in Iowa in 1998. This is a large, two-
story building that is walking distance to the Iowa Hawkeye sporting events.
We pride ourselves in being family friendly and supporting of the neighborhoods in
which the restaurants are located. While we are known for our wings (18 flavors!), the
menu offers a wide range from appetizers to full dinner entrees. The Vine is also a
wonderful place to gather and watch sporting events and cheer for our favorite teams
on our 25+ televisions.
I firmly believe opening a Vine Tavern & Eatery in the Ahwatukee area of Phoenix will
fill a void with an affordable, family friendly, full service restaurant.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Vine Tavern & Eatery
Liquor License Map - Vine Tavern & Eatery
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 107
Liquor License Data: VINE TAVERN & EATERY
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 0
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 3 0
Restaurant 12 7 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 41.69 16.77
Violent Crimes 10.06 2.86 1.16
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 0
Total Violations 94
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1167103 1352 91 % 17 % 1%
1167201 1087 75 % 6% 4%
1167202 1687 44 % 7% 7%
1167203 1430 34 % 7% 5%
1167212 1820 65 % 4% 3%
1167293 1007 98 % 0% 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 108
Liquor License Map: VINE TAVERN & EATERY
3820 E RAY RD
Ü
Date: 6/8/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 109
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Pomo
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189932.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
2 E. Jefferson St. #113
Zoning Classification: DTC- Business Core
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business has plans
to open in September 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 11, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 110
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Pomo Pizzeria Napoletana (Series 12)
8977 N. Scottsdale Road #502, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Pomo Pizzeria Napoletana (Series 12)
366 N. Gilbert Road #102, Gilbert
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Pomo Pizzeria Napoletana (Series 12)
705 N. 1st St. #120, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 15
Liquor license violations: None
Pomo Pizza (Series 12)
2502 E. Camelback Road #148- A and B, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 129
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Opening it's 5th location in the Valley, Pomo is a popular authentic Italian restaurant
Page 111
offering homemade pasta, handcrafted pizza, focaccia, antipasto and salads. Applicant
would like to offer alcoholic beverages as an incident to the dishes its guests 21 and
over enjoy.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommendations approval of this liquor license.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Pomo
Liquor License Map - Pomo
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 112
Liquor License Data: POMO
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 3 1
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 8 6
Bar 6 45 30
Beer and Wine Bar 7 13 6
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 13 1
Hotel 11 7 4
Restaurant 12 94 45
Club 14 3 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 48.30 51.38
Violent Crimes 5.03 26.59 23.56
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 30
Total Violations 93 65
Page 113
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 114
Liquor License Map: POMO
2 E JEFFERSON ST
Ü
Date: 5/16/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 115
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189932.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
2 E. Jefferson St. #113
Zoning Classification: DTC- Business Core
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business has plans
to open in September 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 11, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 110
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Pomo Pizzeria Napoletana (Series 12)
8977 N. Scottsdale Road #502, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Pomo Pizzeria Napoletana (Series 12)
366 N. Gilbert Road #102, Gilbert
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Pomo Pizzeria Napoletana (Series 12)
705 N. 1st St. #120, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 15
Liquor license violations: None
Pomo Pizza (Series 12)
2502 E. Camelback Road #148- A and B, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 129
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Opening it's 5th location in the Valley, Pomo is a popular authentic Italian restaurant
Page 111
offering homemade pasta, handcrafted pizza, focaccia, antipasto and salads. Applicant
would like to offer alcoholic beverages as an incident to the dishes its guests 21 and
over enjoy.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommendations approval of this liquor license.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Pomo
Liquor License Map - Pomo
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 112
Liquor License Data: POMO
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 3 1
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 8 6
Bar 6 45 30
Beer and Wine Bar 7 13 6
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 13 1
Hotel 11 7 4
Restaurant 12 94 45
Club 14 3 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 48.30 51.38
Violent Crimes 5.03 26.59 23.56
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 30
Total Violations 93 65
Page 113
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 114
Liquor License Map: POMO
2 E JEFFERSON ST
Ü
Date: 5/16/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 115
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - X Club Phoenix
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 195681.
Summary
Applicant
Ryan Anderson, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
200 W. Monroe St.
Zoning Classification: DTC-Business Core
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 10, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 116
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The manager has completed on basic and management liquor training, and key staff
will receive liquor training as well. The applicant desires to be a good neighbor and to
make sure all Title 4 liquor laws are enforced.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This restaurant and social amenity space is located in a new and unique housing
complex that provides much needed housing in the central Phoenix core. The
restaurant will provide additional food and social options in an area with fewer choices.
A restaurant liquor license will complete the dining experience.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - X Club Phoenix
Liquor License Map - X Club Phoenix
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 117
Liquor License Data: X CLUB PHOENIX
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 4 1
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 9 3
Bar 6 45 28
Beer and Wine Bar 7 14 7
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 13 4
Hotel 11 7 4
Restaurant 12 98 46
Club 14 3 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 46.33 67.94
Violent Crimes 5.03 26.48 32.48
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 53
Total Violations 93 100
Page 118
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1129002 815 37 % 22 % 24 %
1129003 1372 4% 18 % 40 %
1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
1143011 1389 22 % 15 % 57 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 119
Liquor License Map: X CLUB PHOENIX
200 W MONROE ST
Ü
Date: 5/12/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 120
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 195681.
Summary
Applicant
Ryan Anderson, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
200 W. Monroe St.
Zoning Classification: DTC-Business Core
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 10, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 116
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The manager has completed on basic and management liquor training, and key staff
will receive liquor training as well. The applicant desires to be a good neighbor and to
make sure all Title 4 liquor laws are enforced.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This restaurant and social amenity space is located in a new and unique housing
complex that provides much needed housing in the central Phoenix core. The
restaurant will provide additional food and social options in an area with fewer choices.
A restaurant liquor license will complete the dining experience.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - X Club Phoenix
Liquor License Map - X Club Phoenix
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 117
Liquor License Data: X CLUB PHOENIX
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 4 1
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 9 3
Bar 6 45 28
Beer and Wine Bar 7 14 7
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 13 4
Hotel 11 7 4
Restaurant 12 98 46
Club 14 3 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 46.33 67.94
Violent Crimes 5.03 26.48 32.48
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 53
Total Violations 93 100
Page 118
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1129002 815 37 % 22 % 24 %
1129003 1372 4% 18 % 40 %
1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
1143011 1389 22 % 15 % 57 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 119
Liquor License Map: X CLUB PHOENIX
200 W MONROE ST
Ü
Date: 5/12/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 120
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Congo Brands
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196666.
Summary
Applicant
Aaron Stewart, Agent
License Type
Series 4 - Wholesaler
Location
1202 N. 54th Ave., Ste.105
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a wholesaler. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 9, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration may be given only to the applicant's personal
qualifications and not to the location.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Alani Seltzers LLC (Series 2)
4580 Alvarado Canyon Road, Ste. G2, San Diego
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Page 121
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I hold similar licenses in other states across the country (Kentucky, California,
Virginia)”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 122
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196666.
Summary
Applicant
Aaron Stewart, Agent
License Type
Series 4 - Wholesaler
Location
1202 N. 54th Ave., Ste.105
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a wholesaler. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 9, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration may be given only to the applicant's personal
qualifications and not to the location.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Alani Seltzers LLC (Series 2)
4580 Alvarado Canyon Road, Ste. G2, San Diego
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Page 121
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I hold similar licenses in other states across the country (Kentucky, California,
Virginia)”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 122
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Circle K Store #9556
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197207.
Summary
Applicant
Maria Burgess, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
5150 W. Lower Buckeye Road
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit. This business has plans to open in February 2023.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 25, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
Page 123
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Circle K requires all store personnel to attend an in-house training program. This
training is designed to provide a safe and positive customer service environment. As
part of the Circle K training program, we provide an Alcohol Training Program that
meets the requirements of the Arizona Department of Liquor License Control.
Employees must pass a test on Techniques of Alcohol Management that becomes part
their employee file. Store Managers are required to attend additional in-house training
and obtain certification from the Arizona Department of Liquor License Control. This
certification requires submission of fingerprints and includes background investigation.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It is Circle K's objective to provide a product, accessible in a convenient manner that
meets the need of he surrounding community. Circle K's success depends on us being
able to provide products that are in demand.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Circle K Store #9556
Liquor License Map - Circle K Store #9556
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 124
Liquor License Data: CIRCLE K STORE #9556
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 5.14 11.67
Violent Crimes 5.03 1.53 1.27
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 1
Total Violations 93 5
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1125132 0 0% 0% 0%
1125142 1556 51 % 10 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 125
Liquor License Map: CIRCLE K STORE #9556
5150 W LOWER BUCKEYE RD
Ü
Date: 5/27/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 126
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197207.
Summary
Applicant
Maria Burgess, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
5150 W. Lower Buckeye Road
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit. This business has plans to open in February 2023.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 25, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
Page 123
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Circle K requires all store personnel to attend an in-house training program. This
training is designed to provide a safe and positive customer service environment. As
part of the Circle K training program, we provide an Alcohol Training Program that
meets the requirements of the Arizona Department of Liquor License Control.
Employees must pass a test on Techniques of Alcohol Management that becomes part
their employee file. Store Managers are required to attend additional in-house training
and obtain certification from the Arizona Department of Liquor License Control. This
certification requires submission of fingerprints and includes background investigation.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It is Circle K's objective to provide a product, accessible in a convenient manner that
meets the need of he surrounding community. Circle K's success depends on us being
able to provide products that are in demand.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Circle K Store #9556
Liquor License Map - Circle K Store #9556
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 124
Liquor License Data: CIRCLE K STORE #9556
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 5.14 11.67
Violent Crimes 5.03 1.53 1.27
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 1
Total Violations 93 5
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1125132 0 0% 0% 0%
1125142 1556 51 % 10 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 125
Liquor License Map: CIRCLE K STORE #9556
5150 W LOWER BUCKEYE RD
Ü
Date: 5/27/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 126
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Cold Beers & Cheeseburgers/Bourbon & Bones Cocktail
Lounge
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197833.
Summary
Applicant
Amy Nations, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
401 E. Jefferson St.
Zoning Classification: DTC-Business Core
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 12, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to multiple ownership interest held by the
Page 127
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The ownership owns and operates 20+ restaurant throughout Arizona, Colorado, and
California. They are currently adding several more restaurants opening this year. They
are led by a management team with a combined 100+ years of experience operating
bars and restaurants with liquor licenses. All their employees are trained in Arizona
liquor laws to ensure compliance.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The previous business inside the ballpark has been closed for almost 2 years. We are
excited at the opportunity to be added to the ballpark dining experience and look
forward to adding another great dining option for the patrons of Chase Field.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Cold Beers & Cheeseburgers/Bourbon & Bones Cocktail Lounge
Liquor License Map - Cold Beers & Cheeseburgers/Bourbon & Bones Cocktail Lounge
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 128
Liquor License Data: COLD BEERS & CHEESEBURGERS /
BOURBON & BONES COCKTAIL LOUNGE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 3 0
Wholesaler 4 1 1
Government 5 6 4
Bar 6 42 19
Beer and Wine Bar 7 13 4
Liquor Store 9 4 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 0
Hotel 11 5 2
Restaurant 12 80 29
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 672.58 1126.53
Violent Crimes 10.06 139.72 204.56
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 47
Total Violations 93 88
Page 129
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1132022 1257 47 % 29 % 55 %
1140001 1831 25 % 20 % 47 %
1140002 78 77 % 0% 32 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 130
License Map: COLD BEERS & CHEESEBURGERS / BOURBON & BONES COCKTAIL LOUNGE
401 E JEFFERSON ST
Ü
Date: 6/13/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 131
Report
Lounge
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197833.
Summary
Applicant
Amy Nations, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
401 E. Jefferson St.
Zoning Classification: DTC-Business Core
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 12, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to multiple ownership interest held by the
Page 127
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The ownership owns and operates 20+ restaurant throughout Arizona, Colorado, and
California. They are currently adding several more restaurants opening this year. They
are led by a management team with a combined 100+ years of experience operating
bars and restaurants with liquor licenses. All their employees are trained in Arizona
liquor laws to ensure compliance.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The previous business inside the ballpark has been closed for almost 2 years. We are
excited at the opportunity to be added to the ballpark dining experience and look
forward to adding another great dining option for the patrons of Chase Field.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Cold Beers & Cheeseburgers/Bourbon & Bones Cocktail Lounge
Liquor License Map - Cold Beers & Cheeseburgers/Bourbon & Bones Cocktail Lounge
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 128
Liquor License Data: COLD BEERS & CHEESEBURGERS /
BOURBON & BONES COCKTAIL LOUNGE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 3 0
Wholesaler 4 1 1
Government 5 6 4
Bar 6 42 19
Beer and Wine Bar 7 13 4
Liquor Store 9 4 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 0
Hotel 11 5 2
Restaurant 12 80 29
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 672.58 1126.53
Violent Crimes 10.06 139.72 204.56
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 47
Total Violations 93 88
Page 129
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1132022 1257 47 % 29 % 55 %
1140001 1831 25 % 20 % 47 %
1140002 78 77 % 0% 32 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 130
License Map: COLD BEERS & CHEESEBURGERS / BOURBON & BONES COCKTAIL LOUNGE
401 E JEFFERSON ST
Ü
Date: 6/13/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 131
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Fresh Market on the Go/The Grove, Inc. Bar at PHX
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196013.
Summary
Applicant
Michael Haskins, Agent
License Type
12 - Restaurant
Location
3300 E. Sky Harbor Blvd., T4-F4
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 18, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 132
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“TGI Concessions, Inc. has over 40 years of experience providing food and beverage
services in airports. We have operated a full bar in the Las Vegas airport for over 9
years.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport requires a restaurant to serve the traveling
public in Terminal 4.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Fresh Market on the Go/The Grove, Inc. Bar at PHX
Liquor License Map - Fresh Market on the Go/The Grove, Inc. Bar at PHX
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 133
Liquor License Data: FRESH MARKET ON THE GO/ THE GROVE, INC. BAR AT PHX
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 3 0
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1
Conveyance 8 10 6
Beer and Wine Store 10 2 0
Restaurant 12 20 7
Club 14 3 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 11.75 18.57
Violent Crimes 5.03 0.98 1.06
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 0
Total Violations 93
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1138021 0 0% 0% 0%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 134
Liquor License Map: FRESH MARKET ON THE GO/ THE GROVE, INC. BAR AT PHX
3300 E SKY HARBOR BLVD
Ü
Date: 5/20/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 135
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196013.
Summary
Applicant
Michael Haskins, Agent
License Type
12 - Restaurant
Location
3300 E. Sky Harbor Blvd., T4-F4
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 18, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 132
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“TGI Concessions, Inc. has over 40 years of experience providing food and beverage
services in airports. We have operated a full bar in the Las Vegas airport for over 9
years.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport requires a restaurant to serve the traveling
public in Terminal 4.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Fresh Market on the Go/The Grove, Inc. Bar at PHX
Liquor License Map - Fresh Market on the Go/The Grove, Inc. Bar at PHX
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 133
Liquor License Data: FRESH MARKET ON THE GO/ THE GROVE, INC. BAR AT PHX
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 3 0
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1
Conveyance 8 10 6
Beer and Wine Store 10 2 0
Restaurant 12 20 7
Club 14 3 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 11.75 18.57
Violent Crimes 5.03 0.98 1.06
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 0
Total Violations 93
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1138021 0 0% 0% 0%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 134
Liquor License Map: FRESH MARKET ON THE GO/ THE GROVE, INC. BAR AT PHX
3300 E SKY HARBOR BLVD
Ü
Date: 5/20/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 135
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - The Bread and Honey House
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196445.
Summary
Applicant
Theresa Morse, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4700 E. Van Buren St.
Zoning Classification: C-3
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption as an
accessory to a restaurant.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 23, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
Page 136
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“My wife and I have owned and operated this restaurant since May of 2019. We have
survived the pandemic and remain an asset to the neighboring community as an
authentic Mexican Food Restaurant. We the owners and employees will attend Arizona
Liquor Law Training to comply with all city and state laws. Additionally, the training will
assist us in identifying obviously intoxicated customer (who we will refuse to serve)
and techniques to recognize underage and document their identification along with
recognizing valid ID.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This is a neighborhood restaurant in existence since 2019. The addition of alcoholic
beverages is merely to compliment the sales of food. Our hours of operation are
minimal and we do not have a bar. This is a dining establishment only. Additionally, we
will apply for a Patio Use Permit to enable us to serve food and alcoholic beverages on
our fenced patios. The north patio is fenced and the south patio fencing will be added
shortly. The fencing and employees monitoring will prevent the removal of alcohol from
the premises.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - The Bread and Honey House
Liquor License Map - The Bread and Honey House
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 137
Liquor License Data: THE BREAD AND HONEY HOUSE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 3 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1
Liquor Store 9 2 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 5 2
Hotel 11 7 4
Restaurant 12 2 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 17.01 25.79
Violent Crimes 5.03 8.59 11.88
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 78
Total Violations 93 118
Page 138
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1112021 1913 6% 18 % 38 %
1112031 1003 0% 24 % 37 %
1137002 1578 21 % 11 % 59 %
1137003 1101 31 % 18 % 11 %
1137005 1280 14 % 32 % 52 %
1138011 1007 13 % 30 % 31 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 139
Liquor License Map: THE BREAD AND HONEY HOUSE
4700 E VAN BUREN ST
Ü
Date: 5/26/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 140
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196445.
Summary
Applicant
Theresa Morse, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4700 E. Van Buren St.
Zoning Classification: C-3
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption as an
accessory to a restaurant.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 23, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
Page 136
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“My wife and I have owned and operated this restaurant since May of 2019. We have
survived the pandemic and remain an asset to the neighboring community as an
authentic Mexican Food Restaurant. We the owners and employees will attend Arizona
Liquor Law Training to comply with all city and state laws. Additionally, the training will
assist us in identifying obviously intoxicated customer (who we will refuse to serve)
and techniques to recognize underage and document their identification along with
recognizing valid ID.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This is a neighborhood restaurant in existence since 2019. The addition of alcoholic
beverages is merely to compliment the sales of food. Our hours of operation are
minimal and we do not have a bar. This is a dining establishment only. Additionally, we
will apply for a Patio Use Permit to enable us to serve food and alcoholic beverages on
our fenced patios. The north patio is fenced and the south patio fencing will be added
shortly. The fencing and employees monitoring will prevent the removal of alcohol from
the premises.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - The Bread and Honey House
Liquor License Map - The Bread and Honey House
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 137
Liquor License Data: THE BREAD AND HONEY HOUSE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 3 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1
Liquor Store 9 2 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 5 2
Hotel 11 7 4
Restaurant 12 2 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 17.01 25.79
Violent Crimes 5.03 8.59 11.88
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 78
Total Violations 93 118
Page 138
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1112021 1913 6% 18 % 38 %
1112031 1003 0% 24 % 37 %
1137002 1578 21 % 11 % 59 %
1137003 1101 31 % 18 % 11 %
1137005 1280 14 % 32 % 52 %
1138011 1007 13 % 30 % 31 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 139
Liquor License Map: THE BREAD AND HONEY HOUSE
4700 E VAN BUREN ST
Ü
Date: 5/26/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 140
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Ay, Chabela
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197572.
Summary
Applicant
Andrew Renteria, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
719 E. Roosevelt St.
Zoning Classification: R-5 RI HP ACOD
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 15, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 141
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Our group has the experience and financial means to support our proposed project
with a background in managing similar concepts. We will adhere to the rules and
regulations set by the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County and State of Arizona.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The license will be used to operate an existing restaurant with the hope of bringing on
more people and revenue to the community .”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Ay, Chabela
Liquor License Map - Ay, Chabela
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 142
Liquor License Data: AY, CHABELA
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 3 2
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 9 1
Bar 6 36 9
Beer and Wine Bar 7 16 4
Liquor Store 9 5 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 12 5
Hotel 11 6 3
Restaurant 12 104 33
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 58.06 41.93
Violent Crimes 5.03 21.73 18.36
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 171
Total Violations 93 279
Page 143
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1117003 1057 64 % 2% 10 %
1118004 671 62 % 6% 6%
1130002 873 29 % 21 % 38 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1132011 1312 29 % 26 % 48 %
1132012 962 50 % 23 % 44 %
1132021 731 33 % 20 % 74 %
1132022 1257 47 % 29 % 55 %
1132031 1473 30 % 20 % 57 %
1132032 638 28 % 7% 70 %
1140001 1831 25 % 20 % 47 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 144
Liquor License Map: AY, CHABELA
719 E ROOSEVELT ST
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 145
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197572.
Summary
Applicant
Andrew Renteria, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
719 E. Roosevelt St.
Zoning Classification: R-5 RI HP ACOD
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 15, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 141
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Our group has the experience and financial means to support our proposed project
with a background in managing similar concepts. We will adhere to the rules and
regulations set by the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County and State of Arizona.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The license will be used to operate an existing restaurant with the hope of bringing on
more people and revenue to the community .”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Ay, Chabela
Liquor License Map - Ay, Chabela
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 142
Liquor License Data: AY, CHABELA
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 3 2
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 9 1
Bar 6 36 9
Beer and Wine Bar 7 16 4
Liquor Store 9 5 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 12 5
Hotel 11 6 3
Restaurant 12 104 33
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 58.06 41.93
Violent Crimes 5.03 21.73 18.36
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 171
Total Violations 93 279
Page 143
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1117003 1057 64 % 2% 10 %
1118004 671 62 % 6% 6%
1130002 873 29 % 21 % 38 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1132011 1312 29 % 26 % 48 %
1132012 962 50 % 23 % 44 %
1132021 731 33 % 20 % 74 %
1132022 1257 47 % 29 % 55 %
1132031 1473 30 % 20 % 57 %
1132032 638 28 % 7% 70 %
1140001 1831 25 % 20 % 47 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 144
Liquor License Map: AY, CHABELA
719 E ROOSEVELT ST
Ü
Date: 5/19/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 145
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 198682.
Summary
Applicant
Lindsey Hinojosa, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
3437 W. Dunlap Ave., Ste. C
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit. This location requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales as
an accessory to a convenience store.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 146
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am assured to uphold the laws and regulations about beer and wine license. I have
never been involved in any criminal activity, no record of getting in trouble with law and
authorities.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This store will provide a safe and secure place for the neighborhood to buy alcohol.
The location will be convenient for the people in neighborhood who may not have
access to transportation. Adding the long time experience of the working in
convenience store while upholding all the laws and regulations, the store will be a safe,
secure and convenience place for the customers to purchase quality beer and wine.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - AZ Mini Market
Liquor License Map - AZ Mini Market
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 147
Liquor License Data: AZ MINI MARKET
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 4 1
Liquor Store 9 2 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 11 7
Restaurant 12 8 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 55.83 39.38
Violent Crimes 10.06 10.56 9.87
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 163
Total Violations 94 360
Page 148
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1042051 1264 61 % 16 % 7%
1042053 1213 89 % 9% 3%
1042054 1577 5% 21 % 30 %
1042061 1580 92 % 7% 28 %
1042062 1557 65 % 6% 34 %
1056011 2072 66 % 5% 23 %
1056022 2457 38 % 23 % 34 %
1056023 2787 15 % 21 % 27 %
1057021 2725 66 % 7% 22 %
1057022 1187 68 % 22 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 149
Liquor License Map: AZ MINI MARKET
3437 W DUNLAP AVE
Ü
Date: 6/3/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 150
Report
Summary
Applicant
Lindsey Hinojosa, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
3437 W. Dunlap Ave., Ste. C
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit. This location requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales as
an accessory to a convenience store.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 146
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am assured to uphold the laws and regulations about beer and wine license. I have
never been involved in any criminal activity, no record of getting in trouble with law and
authorities.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This store will provide a safe and secure place for the neighborhood to buy alcohol.
The location will be convenient for the people in neighborhood who may not have
access to transportation. Adding the long time experience of the working in
convenience store while upholding all the laws and regulations, the store will be a safe,
secure and convenience place for the customers to purchase quality beer and wine.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - AZ Mini Market
Liquor License Map - AZ Mini Market
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 147
Liquor License Data: AZ MINI MARKET
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 4 1
Liquor Store 9 2 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 11 7
Restaurant 12 8 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 55.83 39.38
Violent Crimes 10.06 10.56 9.87
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 163
Total Violations 94 360
Page 148
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1042051 1264 61 % 16 % 7%
1042053 1213 89 % 9% 3%
1042054 1577 5% 21 % 30 %
1042061 1580 92 % 7% 28 %
1042062 1557 65 % 6% 34 %
1056011 2072 66 % 5% 23 %
1056022 2457 38 % 23 % 34 %
1056023 2787 15 % 21 % 27 %
1057021 2725 66 % 7% 22 %
1057022 1187 68 % 22 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 149
Liquor License Map: AZ MINI MARKET
3437 W DUNLAP AVE
Ü
Date: 6/3/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 150
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Restaurant #214
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 195983.
Summary
Applicant
Joanne Feinstein, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
3780 W. Happy Valley Road, Ste. 110-113
Zoning Classification: C-2 SP
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 17, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 151
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
First Watch Restaurant #451(Series 12)
9425 W. Glendale Ave., Ste. 110, Glendale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
First Watch Restaurants #445 (Series 12)
2111 N. Power Road, #101, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
First Watch Restaurant #273 (Series 12)
9325 E. Shea Blvd., Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
First Watch #453 (Series 12)
1080 W. Irvington Road, #180, Tucson
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“First Watch Restaurants, Inc. is a publicly traded company with 430 + locations in 28
states. We currently hold more than 262 liquor licenses in various jurisdictions, and to
date, have never had a citation or violation against one of those liquor licenses. We
participate in responsible server training as required by law and as a matter of good
practice where optional in all of our locations.”
Page 152
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"The issuance of the liquor license enhances First Watch's already successful
business model and supports additional jobs in the restaurant. First Watch continues to
be a family-oriented restaurant company with closing hours daily at 2:30 pm. The
addition of alcohol on the menu provides a wider selection and enhanced experience
for our legal drinking age guests. Our primary revenue generator continues to be
food/meals, and the addition of alcoholic drinks on the menu provides additional
options for our guests.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - First Watch Restaurant #214
Liquor License Map - First Watch Restaurant #214
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 153
Liquor License Data: FIRST WATCH RESTAURANT #214
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 1 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 3
Restaurant 12 2 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 3.45 6.90
Violent Crimes 5.03 1 1.91
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 4
Total Violations 93 12
Page 154
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6116001 1665 93 % 8% 1%
6116002 1573 73 % 3% 1%
6118001 2638 90 % 0% 7%
6118002 1930 94 % 0% 3%
6118003 1791 62 % 7% 10 %
6118004 1407 85 % 8% 10 %
6119001 1639 93 % 5% 0%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 155
Liquor License Map: FIRST WATCH RESTAURANT #214
3780 W HAPPY VALLEY RD
Ü
Date: 6/13/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 156
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 195983.
Summary
Applicant
Joanne Feinstein, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
3780 W. Happy Valley Road, Ste. 110-113
Zoning Classification: C-2 SP
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 17, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 151
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
First Watch Restaurant #451(Series 12)
9425 W. Glendale Ave., Ste. 110, Glendale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
First Watch Restaurants #445 (Series 12)
2111 N. Power Road, #101, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
First Watch Restaurant #273 (Series 12)
9325 E. Shea Blvd., Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
First Watch #453 (Series 12)
1080 W. Irvington Road, #180, Tucson
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“First Watch Restaurants, Inc. is a publicly traded company with 430 + locations in 28
states. We currently hold more than 262 liquor licenses in various jurisdictions, and to
date, have never had a citation or violation against one of those liquor licenses. We
participate in responsible server training as required by law and as a matter of good
practice where optional in all of our locations.”
Page 152
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"The issuance of the liquor license enhances First Watch's already successful
business model and supports additional jobs in the restaurant. First Watch continues to
be a family-oriented restaurant company with closing hours daily at 2:30 pm. The
addition of alcohol on the menu provides a wider selection and enhanced experience
for our legal drinking age guests. Our primary revenue generator continues to be
food/meals, and the addition of alcoholic drinks on the menu provides additional
options for our guests.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - First Watch Restaurant #214
Liquor License Map - First Watch Restaurant #214
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 153
Liquor License Data: FIRST WATCH RESTAURANT #214
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 1 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 3
Restaurant 12 2 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 3.45 6.90
Violent Crimes 5.03 1 1.91
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 4
Total Violations 93 12
Page 154
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6116001 1665 93 % 8% 1%
6116002 1573 73 % 3% 1%
6118001 2638 90 % 0% 7%
6118002 1930 94 % 0% 3%
6118003 1791 62 % 7% 10 %
6118004 1407 85 % 8% 10 %
6119001 1639 93 % 5% 0%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 155
Liquor License Map: FIRST WATCH RESTAURANT #214
3780 W HAPPY VALLEY RD
Ü
Date: 6/13/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 156
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196588.
Summary
Applicant
Erika Siqueiros, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
18425 N. 51st Ave., Ste. G
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow the sales of alcoholic beverages as an accessory to a
restaurant.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 19, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 157
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We will obtain Bar Certifications and Manager Certification for the establishment. We
will run the business according federal, State and local laws.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It is to take the reasonable steps to protect the safety of a customer entering and
leaving the premises as state by the rules and regulations of Arizona.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Tacos Chisco
Liquor License Map - Tacos Chisco
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 158
Liquor License Data: TACOS CHISCO
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 0
Liquor Store 9 2 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 5 0
Restaurant 12 14 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 5.65 5.94
Violent Crimes 5.03 1.64 1.80
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 72
Total Violations 93 131
Page 159
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6160001 924 86 % 7% 7%
6161002 1279 89 % 0% 4%
6162001 1405 82 % 17 % 3%
6162002 1726 84 % 10 % 4%
6180001 2499 85 % 2% 12 %
6181001 1795 84 % 3% 7%
6181002 1569 92 % 0% 6%
6181003 1271 93 % 6% 0%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 160
Liquor License Map: TACOS CHISCO
18425 N 51ST AVE
Ü
Date: 5/24/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 161
Report
Summary
Applicant
Erika Siqueiros, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
18425 N. 51st Ave., Ste. G
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow the sales of alcoholic beverages as an accessory to a
restaurant.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 19, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 157
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We will obtain Bar Certifications and Manager Certification for the establishment. We
will run the business according federal, State and local laws.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It is to take the reasonable steps to protect the safety of a customer entering and
leaving the premises as state by the rules and regulations of Arizona.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Tacos Chisco
Liquor License Map - Tacos Chisco
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 158
Liquor License Data: TACOS CHISCO
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 0
Liquor Store 9 2 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 5 0
Restaurant 12 14 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 5.65 5.94
Violent Crimes 5.03 1.64 1.80
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 72
Total Violations 93 131
Page 159
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6160001 924 86 % 7% 7%
6161002 1279 89 % 0% 4%
6162001 1405 82 % 17 % 3%
6162002 1726 84 % 10 % 4%
6180001 2499 85 % 2% 12 %
6181001 1795 84 % 3% 7%
6181002 1569 92 % 0% 6%
6181003 1271 93 % 6% 0%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 160
Liquor License Map: TACOS CHISCO
18425 N 51ST AVE
Ü
Date: 5/24/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 161
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 07070635.
Summary
Applicant
Martha Guzman De Guerrero, Agent
License Type
Series 7 - Beer and Wine Bar
Location
5450 E. High St., Ste. 109
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2
This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a beer and wine bar.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 162
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have never been convicted of any felony or misdemeanor, I am commited to
upholding the highest standars for busnisess, I am trained in the techniques of legal
and responsible alcohol service and sales as well my manager and staff”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“M3V is a successful local salon. We have built an amazing reputation for one unique
experience of enjoying your nail service while having your drink as well. We look
forward to continuing our concept of Nails, coffee and wine.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - M3V The Nail Bar
Liquor License Map - M3V The Nail Bar
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 163
Liquor License Data: M3V THE NAIL BAR
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 9 3
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 3
Liquor Store 9 3 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 1
Restaurant 12 30 9
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 7.37 8.59
Violent Crimes 10.06 0.66 0.84
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 1
Total Violations 93 1
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6152001 1993 8% 29 % 12 %
6152002 2127 70 % 10 % 4%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 164
Liquor License Map: M3V THE NAIL BAR
5450 E HIGH ST
Ü
Date: 6/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 165
Report
Summary
Applicant
Martha Guzman De Guerrero, Agent
License Type
Series 7 - Beer and Wine Bar
Location
5450 E. High St., Ste. 109
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2
This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a beer and wine bar.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 162
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have never been convicted of any felony or misdemeanor, I am commited to
upholding the highest standars for busnisess, I am trained in the techniques of legal
and responsible alcohol service and sales as well my manager and staff”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“M3V is a successful local salon. We have built an amazing reputation for one unique
experience of enjoying your nail service while having your drink as well. We look
forward to continuing our concept of Nails, coffee and wine.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - M3V The Nail Bar
Liquor License Map - M3V The Nail Bar
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 163
Liquor License Data: M3V THE NAIL BAR
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 9 3
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 3
Liquor Store 9 3 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 1
Restaurant 12 30 9
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 7.37 8.59
Violent Crimes 10.06 0.66 0.84
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 1
Total Violations 93 1
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6152001 1993 8% 29 % 12 %
6152002 2127 70 % 10 % 4%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 164
Liquor License Map: M3V THE NAIL BAR
5450 E HIGH ST
Ü
Date: 6/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 165
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Grill
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197953.
Summary
Applicant
Jissel Morales, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
19401 N. Cave Creek Road, #15-17
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business has plans
to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 15, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 166
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owner's of SR Ozzy's Bar & Grill are committed to upholding the highest
standards for it's business practices and employees. They have been trained in all
techniques of legal and responsibility and have taken the Title 4 liquor law training
course. They will operate the business on a day to day basis. As owners of the
business they will oversee all employees and will provide a safe experience for staff
and patrons.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The owner's of SR Ozzy's Bar & Grill wish to provide the public will full restaurant
service with alcohol sales at the request of patrons. In addition SR Ozzy's Bar & Grill
will responsibly adhere to all State, City and, County rules and regulations.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - SR Ozzy's Bar & Grill
Liquor License Map - SR Ozzy's Bar & Grill
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 167
Liquor License Data: SR OZZY'S BAR & GRILL
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 2
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 7 4
Restaurant 12 3 1
Club 14 1 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 18.39 28.45
Violent Crimes 10.06 1.96 3.18
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 83
Total Violations 93 132
Page 168
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6169001 1123 80 % 10 % 5%
6169002 1495 62 % 4% 17 %
6169003 1399 22 % 11 % 4%
6170001 1028 73 % 21 % 3%
6170003 1050 72 % 0% 35 %
6170004 1193 51 % 22 % 15 %
6170005 817 83 % 14 % 18 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 169
Liquor License Map: SR OZZY'S BAR & GRILL
19401 N CAVE CREEK RD
Ü
Date: 6/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 170
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197953.
Summary
Applicant
Jissel Morales, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
19401 N. Cave Creek Road, #15-17
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business has plans
to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 15, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 166
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owner's of SR Ozzy's Bar & Grill are committed to upholding the highest
standards for it's business practices and employees. They have been trained in all
techniques of legal and responsibility and have taken the Title 4 liquor law training
course. They will operate the business on a day to day basis. As owners of the
business they will oversee all employees and will provide a safe experience for staff
and patrons.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The owner's of SR Ozzy's Bar & Grill wish to provide the public will full restaurant
service with alcohol sales at the request of patrons. In addition SR Ozzy's Bar & Grill
will responsibly adhere to all State, City and, County rules and regulations.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - SR Ozzy's Bar & Grill
Liquor License Map - SR Ozzy's Bar & Grill
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 167
Liquor License Data: SR OZZY'S BAR & GRILL
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 2
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 7 4
Restaurant 12 3 1
Club 14 1 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 18.39 28.45
Violent Crimes 10.06 1.96 3.18
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 83
Total Violations 93 132
Page 168
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6169001 1123 80 % 10 % 5%
6169002 1495 62 % 4% 17 %
6169003 1399 22 % 11 % 4%
6170001 1028 73 % 21 % 3%
6170003 1050 72 % 0% 35 %
6170004 1193 51 % 22 % 15 %
6170005 817 83 % 14 % 18 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 169
Liquor License Map: SR OZZY'S BAR & GRILL
19401 N CAVE CREEK RD
Ü
Date: 6/6/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 170
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
& Wine
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 010070004279.
Summary
Applicant
Martel Delly, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
18403 N. 19th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3
This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a beer and
wine store. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 9, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
Page 171
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have owned this location since 2019. I have had no violations of any kind. I have
also been thru basic and manage liquor training. I am upgrading my license to a
Series 9 to offer more variety to my neighbors who have requested it.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 172
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 010070004279.
Summary
Applicant
Martel Delly, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
18403 N. 19th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3
This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a beer and
wine store. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 9, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
Page 171
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have owned this location since 2019. I have had no violations of any kind. I have
also been thru basic and manage liquor training. I am upgrading my license to a
Series 9 to offer more variety to my neighbors who have requested it.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 172
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196736.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
10625 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste. 125A
Zoning Classification: C-1, C-2, and C-2 SP
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption as an
accessory to a restaurant. This business has plans to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 173
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Torchy's Tacos (Series 12)
1935 E. Camelback Road, #C-130, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 12
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“With over 100 locations across the United States, Torchy's Tacos is opening its
second location in Arizona. Torchy's Tacos is a casual family-friendly neighborhood
restaurant featuring a variety of tacos made with fresh ingredients. Applicant would like
to offer alcoholic beverages to guests 21 and over as an incident to the dishes served.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Torchy's Tacos
Liquor License Map - Torchy's Tacos
Page 174
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 175
Liquor License Data: TORCHY'S TACOS
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 1
Bar 6 1 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 2
Liquor Store 9 2 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 5 4
Hotel 11 1 0
Restaurant 12 11 8
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 99.81 241.82
Violent Crimes 10.06 9.04 17.40
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 16
Total Violations 94 21
Page 176
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1032081 1605 97 % 10 % 12 %
1032083 885 93 % 10 % 0%
1032092 970 69 % 24 % 27 %
1032093 1766 93 % 17 % 2%
1032094 1796 71 % 20 % 9%
1050032 1980 98 % 12 % 10 %
1051012 1805 94 % 8% 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 177
Liquor License Map: TORCHY'S TACOS
10625 N TATUM BLVD
Ü
Date: 6/3/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 178
Report
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
10625 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste. 125A
Zoning Classification: C-1, C-2, and C-2 SP
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption as an
accessory to a restaurant. This business has plans to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 173
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Torchy's Tacos (Series 12)
1935 E. Camelback Road, #C-130, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 12
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“With over 100 locations across the United States, Torchy's Tacos is opening its
second location in Arizona. Torchy's Tacos is a casual family-friendly neighborhood
restaurant featuring a variety of tacos made with fresh ingredients. Applicant would like
to offer alcoholic beverages to guests 21 and over as an incident to the dishes served.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Torchy's Tacos
Liquor License Map - Torchy's Tacos
Page 174
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 175
Liquor License Data: TORCHY'S TACOS
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 1
Bar 6 1 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 2
Liquor Store 9 2 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 5 4
Hotel 11 1 0
Restaurant 12 11 8
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 99.81 241.82
Violent Crimes 10.06 9.04 17.40
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 16
Total Violations 94 21
Page 176
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1032081 1605 97 % 10 % 12 %
1032083 885 93 % 10 % 0%
1032092 970 69 % 24 % 27 %
1032093 1766 93 % 17 % 2%
1032094 1796 71 % 20 % 9%
1050032 1980 98 % 12 % 10 %
1051012 1805 94 % 8% 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 177
Liquor License Map: TORCHY'S TACOS
10625 N TATUM BLVD
Ü
Date: 6/3/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 178
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Restaurant
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197358.
Summary
Applicant
Jose Manuel Ramirez Sanchez, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4414 N. 7th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2 SAUMSO
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 25, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 179
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
El Chullo Peruvian Restaurant and Bar (Series 12)
2605 N. 7th St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 3
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters were received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We have the qualified personnel that has experience handling liquor, from bartending,
behind the counter, to restaurant services. We are citizens with no criminal
backgrounds or have had any kind of encounter with the law. We support and enforce
the city, state and federal laws.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This is our second restaurant with a new concept in the city of Phoenix. It's our plan
and desire to display Peru's National spirit "Pisco". We have the vision of creating a
fun and welcoming atmosphere with the addition of great cultural interaction. We think
it will be a great opportunity for the citizen of the city of Phoenix and ourselves to
expand our horizons to experience something new.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - El Chullo Restaurant
Liquor License Map - El Chullo Restaurant
Page 180
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 181
Liquor License Data: EL CHULLO RESTAURANT
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 13 7
Beer and Wine Bar 7 10 0
Liquor Store 9 5 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 5
Hotel 11 1 0
Restaurant 12 35 7
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 49.60 45.22
Violent Crimes 5.03 18.07 16.34
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 0 0
Total Violations
Page 182
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1088021 1456 23 % 32 % 31 %
1089011 988 36 % 15 % 30 %
1089012 1297 31 % 23 % 54 %
1089022 1250 42 % 26 % 22 %
1089023 1072 28 % 3% 47 %
1089024 1278 46 % 9% 21 %
1104001 1724 53 % 6% 33 %
1105011 551 49 % 20 % 14 %
1105012 1249 13 % 23 % 11 %
1171001 2126 10 % 15 % 10 %
1171002 703 57 % 27 % 12 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 183
Liquor License Map: EL CHULLO RESTAURANT
4414 N 7TH AVE
Ü
Date: 5/31/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 184
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197358.
Summary
Applicant
Jose Manuel Ramirez Sanchez, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4414 N. 7th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2 SAUMSO
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 25, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 179
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
El Chullo Peruvian Restaurant and Bar (Series 12)
2605 N. 7th St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 3
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters were received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We have the qualified personnel that has experience handling liquor, from bartending,
behind the counter, to restaurant services. We are citizens with no criminal
backgrounds or have had any kind of encounter with the law. We support and enforce
the city, state and federal laws.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This is our second restaurant with a new concept in the city of Phoenix. It's our plan
and desire to display Peru's National spirit "Pisco". We have the vision of creating a
fun and welcoming atmosphere with the addition of great cultural interaction. We think
it will be a great opportunity for the citizen of the city of Phoenix and ourselves to
expand our horizons to experience something new.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - El Chullo Restaurant
Liquor License Map - El Chullo Restaurant
Page 180
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 181
Liquor License Data: EL CHULLO RESTAURANT
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 13 7
Beer and Wine Bar 7 10 0
Liquor Store 9 5 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 5
Hotel 11 1 0
Restaurant 12 35 7
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 49.60 45.22
Violent Crimes 5.03 18.07 16.34
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 0 0
Total Violations
Page 182
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1088021 1456 23 % 32 % 31 %
1089011 988 36 % 15 % 30 %
1089012 1297 31 % 23 % 54 %
1089022 1250 42 % 26 % 22 %
1089023 1072 28 % 3% 47 %
1089024 1278 46 % 9% 21 %
1104001 1724 53 % 6% 33 %
1105011 551 49 % 20 % 14 %
1105012 1249 13 % 23 % 11 %
1171001 2126 10 % 15 % 10 %
1171002 703 57 % 27 % 12 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 183
Liquor License Map: EL CHULLO RESTAURANT
4414 N 7TH AVE
Ü
Date: 5/31/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 184
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196427.
Summary
Applicant
Yosuke Takahashi, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
507 W. Thomas Road
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a liquor license for a restaurant. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 23, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 185
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have had a lot of bussiness. in my life, and I have never gotten into troble or broken
any laws.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We believe we can serve good Japanese comfort food and strongly believe that
having alcohol menu is a great compliment to the food menu.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Kaisen
Liquor License Map - Kaisen
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 186
Liquor License Data: KAISEN
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 2 0
Bar 6 5 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 1
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 11 2
Hotel 11 2 1
Restaurant 12 23 12
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 432.80 834.28
Violent Crimes 10.06 74.52 144.16
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 0 0
Total Violations
Page 187
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1104002 778 35 % 16 % 12 %
1105013 824 16 % 17 % 40 %
1105022 1216 28 % 19 % 23 %
1118001 742 44 % 28 % 5%
1118002 1030 67 % 9% 17 %
1118003 996 65 % 15 % 4%
1119001 678 96 % 8% 4%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 188
Liquor License Map: KAISEN
507 W THOMAS RD
Ü
Date: 5/24/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 189
Report
Summary
Applicant
Yosuke Takahashi, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
507 W. Thomas Road
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a liquor license for a restaurant. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 23, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 185
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have had a lot of bussiness. in my life, and I have never gotten into troble or broken
any laws.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We believe we can serve good Japanese comfort food and strongly believe that
having alcohol menu is a great compliment to the food menu.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Kaisen
Liquor License Map - Kaisen
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 186
Liquor License Data: KAISEN
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 2 0
Bar 6 5 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 1
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 11 2
Hotel 11 2 1
Restaurant 12 23 12
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 432.80 834.28
Violent Crimes 10.06 74.52 144.16
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 0 0
Total Violations
Page 187
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1104002 778 35 % 16 % 12 %
1105013 824 16 % 17 % 40 %
1105022 1216 28 % 19 % 23 %
1118001 742 44 % 28 % 5%
1118002 1030 67 % 9% 17 %
1118003 996 65 % 15 % 4%
1119001 678 96 % 8% 4%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 188
Liquor License Map: KAISEN
507 W THOMAS RD
Ü
Date: 5/24/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 189
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 010070017006S.
Summary
Applicant
Michela Ricci, Agent
License Type
Series 10S - Addition of Sampling Privileges for a Beer and Wine Store
Location
3508 N. 7th St., Ste. 140
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 4
This request is for the addition of Sampling Privileges to an existing liquor license for a
beer and wine store. This location is currently licensed for a Series 10 - Beer and Wine
Store.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 12, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 190
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor License and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Monsoon Market (Series 10)
3508 N. 7th St., Ste. 140, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 13
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have owned my first small business The Early Bird PHX Coffee, for over 4 years and
have maintained 100% compliance with all city departments, and state departments
including required permitting and routine inspections. In previous roles throughout my
career I have worked with multiple local, beloved breweries in Phoenix and have
experience with the inventory management, regulations and the admin work required
to maintain a liquor license."
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Monsoon Market will be a neighborhood market, within walking distance of multiple
established neighborhoods and will provide access to not only local beer and natural
wine but also fresh, local food items and pantry staples along with retail home items for
any occasion. Monsoon will provide a neighborhood market in an area where grocery
markets are solemn and not easily accessible by food or surrounding neighborhoods."
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Monsoon Market
Liquor License Map - Monsoon Market
Page 191
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 192
Liquor License Data: MONSOON MARKET
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 12 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 6 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 13 6
Hotel 11 2 0
Restaurant 12 23 7
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 46.70 67.30
Violent Crimes 5.03 15.97 18.15
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 107
Total Violations 93 191
Page 193
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1086012 1402 58 % 36 % 46 %
1105011 551 49 % 20 % 14 %
1105013 824 16 % 17 % 40 %
1105021 1057 13 % 34 % 30 %
1105022 1216 28 % 19 % 23 %
1106001 1027 29 % 17 % 34 %
1106003 801 27 % 29 % 49 %
1106004 1456 47 % 27 % 3%
1171001 2126 10 % 15 % 10 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 194
Liquor License Map: MONSOON MARKET
3508 N 7TH ST
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
Date: 5/26/2022
City Clerk Department
Page 195
Report
Summary
Applicant
Michela Ricci, Agent
License Type
Series 10S - Addition of Sampling Privileges for a Beer and Wine Store
Location
3508 N. 7th St., Ste. 140
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 4
This request is for the addition of Sampling Privileges to an existing liquor license for a
beer and wine store. This location is currently licensed for a Series 10 - Beer and Wine
Store.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 12, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 190
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor License and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Monsoon Market (Series 10)
3508 N. 7th St., Ste. 140, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 13
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have owned my first small business The Early Bird PHX Coffee, for over 4 years and
have maintained 100% compliance with all city departments, and state departments
including required permitting and routine inspections. In previous roles throughout my
career I have worked with multiple local, beloved breweries in Phoenix and have
experience with the inventory management, regulations and the admin work required
to maintain a liquor license."
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Monsoon Market will be a neighborhood market, within walking distance of multiple
established neighborhoods and will provide access to not only local beer and natural
wine but also fresh, local food items and pantry staples along with retail home items for
any occasion. Monsoon will provide a neighborhood market in an area where grocery
markets are solemn and not easily accessible by food or surrounding neighborhoods."
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Monsoon Market
Liquor License Map - Monsoon Market
Page 191
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 192
Liquor License Data: MONSOON MARKET
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 12 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 6 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 13 6
Hotel 11 2 0
Restaurant 12 23 7
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 46.70 67.30
Violent Crimes 5.03 15.97 18.15
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 107
Total Violations 93 191
Page 193
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1086012 1402 58 % 36 % 46 %
1105011 551 49 % 20 % 14 %
1105013 824 16 % 17 % 40 %
1105021 1057 13 % 34 % 30 %
1105022 1216 28 % 19 % 23 %
1106001 1027 29 % 17 % 34 %
1106003 801 27 % 29 % 49 %
1106004 1456 47 % 27 % 3%
1171001 2126 10 % 15 % 10 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 194
Liquor License Map: MONSOON MARKET
3508 N 7TH ST
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
Date: 5/26/2022
City Clerk Department
Page 195
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Provisions
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197489.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
3410 N. 24th St.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location is currently
licensed for liquor sales with a Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store liquor license.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 196
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Nomada Provisions (Series 10)
3410 N. 24th St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: None
Liquor license violations: None
Nonna Urban Eatery (Series 12)
7240 E. Main St., C-100, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff are trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Nomada Provisions will expand its market to include a restaurant headed by Chef
Gian Franco Brugaletta. The menu will feature simple, nutritious dishes prepared with
the finest ingredients, using traditional and creative techniques to bring out unique and
delicious flavors. Applicant would like to offer alcoholic beverages to guests 21 and
over as an incident to the dishes served.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Page 197
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Nomada Provisions
Liquor License Map - Nomada Provisions
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 198
Liquor License Data: NOMADA PROVISIONS
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 6 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 2
Liquor Store 9 5 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 11 1
Restaurant 12 16 5
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 13.64 0.95
Violent Crimes 10.06 3.60 1.38
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 90
Total Violations 94 160
Page 199
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1084003 1071 34 % 8% 40 %
1085021 743 50 % 29 % 20 %
1107012 1519 40 % 19 % 29 %
1107021 1972 58 % 0% 30 %
1107022 2172 32 % 20 % 32 %
1108011 1736 56 % 27 % 40 %
1108022 1168 33 % 16 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 200
Liquor License Map: NOMADA PROVISIONS
3410 N 24TH ST
Ü
Date: 6/3/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 201
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197489.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
3410 N. 24th St.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location is currently
licensed for liquor sales with a Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store liquor license.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 196
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Nomada Provisions (Series 10)
3410 N. 24th St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: None
Liquor license violations: None
Nonna Urban Eatery (Series 12)
7240 E. Main St., C-100, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff are trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Nomada Provisions will expand its market to include a restaurant headed by Chef
Gian Franco Brugaletta. The menu will feature simple, nutritious dishes prepared with
the finest ingredients, using traditional and creative techniques to bring out unique and
delicious flavors. Applicant would like to offer alcoholic beverages to guests 21 and
over as an incident to the dishes served.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Page 197
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Nomada Provisions
Liquor License Map - Nomada Provisions
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 198
Liquor License Data: NOMADA PROVISIONS
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 6 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 2
Liquor Store 9 5 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 11 1
Restaurant 12 16 5
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 13.64 0.95
Violent Crimes 10.06 3.60 1.38
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 90
Total Violations 94 160
Page 199
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1084003 1071 34 % 8% 40 %
1085021 743 50 % 29 % 20 %
1107012 1519 40 % 19 % 29 %
1107021 1972 58 % 0% 30 %
1107022 2172 32 % 20 % 32 %
1108011 1736 56 % 27 % 40 %
1108022 1168 33 % 16 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 200
Liquor License Map: NOMADA PROVISIONS
3410 N 24TH ST
Ü
Date: 6/3/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 201
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196430.
Summary
Applicant
Ernest Nyarko, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
3110 N. Central Ave., Ste. 183
Zoning Classification: WU T6:HWR MT
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption as an
accessory to a restaurant.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 5, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 202
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because: I
have been in the restaurant industry for the past 6 years and have maintained good
standing in regards with safety and responsibility. I am also capable, qualified and
reliable to manage the sales of alcoholic beverages in a restaurant setting within the
rules and regulations.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Contribution to net employment gain (especially of local residents). Generation of
additional tax revenue. Enhanced and/or increased public utilization of space.
Contribution to the long-term economic development goals of the community. Positive
(cultural) entertainment.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - West Hut
Liquor License Map - West Hut
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 203
Liquor License Data: WEST HUT
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 9 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1
Liquor Store 9 5 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 14 4
Hotel 11 2 1
Restaurant 12 31 13
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 577.14 1251.48
Violent Crimes 10.06 107.05 206.05
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 60
Total Violations 94 93
Page 204
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1105011 551 49 % 20 % 14 %
1105012 1249 13 % 23 % 11 %
1105013 824 16 % 17 % 40 %
1105021 1057 13 % 34 % 30 %
1105022 1216 28 % 19 % 23 %
1118001 742 44 % 28 % 5%
1118003 996 65 % 15 % 4%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 205
Liquor License Map: WEST HUT
3110 N CENTRAL AVE
Ü
Date: 6/8/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 206
Report
Summary
Applicant
Ernest Nyarko, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
3110 N. Central Ave., Ste. 183
Zoning Classification: WU T6:HWR MT
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption as an
accessory to a restaurant.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 5, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 202
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because: I
have been in the restaurant industry for the past 6 years and have maintained good
standing in regards with safety and responsibility. I am also capable, qualified and
reliable to manage the sales of alcoholic beverages in a restaurant setting within the
rules and regulations.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Contribution to net employment gain (especially of local residents). Generation of
additional tax revenue. Enhanced and/or increased public utilization of space.
Contribution to the long-term economic development goals of the community. Positive
(cultural) entertainment.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - West Hut
Liquor License Map - West Hut
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 203
Liquor License Data: WEST HUT
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 9 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1
Liquor Store 9 5 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 14 4
Hotel 11 2 1
Restaurant 12 31 13
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 577.14 1251.48
Violent Crimes 10.06 107.05 206.05
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 60
Total Violations 94 93
Page 204
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1105011 551 49 % 20 % 14 %
1105012 1249 13 % 23 % 11 %
1105013 824 16 % 17 % 40 %
1105021 1057 13 % 34 % 30 %
1105022 1216 28 % 19 % 23 %
1118001 742 44 % 28 % 5%
1118003 996 65 % 15 % 4%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 205
Liquor License Map: WEST HUT
3110 N CENTRAL AVE
Ü
Date: 6/8/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 206
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 190477.
Summary
Applicant
Gilda R Schwendener Ralon, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
8375 N. 7th St. #C
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 10, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 207
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Mi Pueblo Market (Series 10)
751 E. Broadway Road, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Comunidad Latina (Series 10)
1616 E. Main St. #128, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
La Guatemalteca (Series 10)
4520 N. 19th Ave., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 7
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
Two letters protesting the issuance of this license have been received and are on file in
the Office of the City Clerk. The letters are from local residents. They feel that there
are sufficient liquor licenses in the area and do not need any more locations to
purchase alcohol from. They believe the issuance of this license will have a negative
impact on their neighborhood and do not support issuing it.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have the capability to hold a liquor license because I own various liquor license in
Mesa I have two liquor licences one since 2017 with no complaint. In the city of
Phoenix I have one also with no complaints. I work hard to make sure all my busniess
follow all the laws that involved in having a liquor license.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This is a conviniance store we especialies in central american products the
Page 208
neighborhood will benefits from this store to try all central american products and there
beers.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - De Mi Pais Market
Liquor License Map - De Mi Pais Market
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 209
Liquor License Data: DE MI PAIS MARKET
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 5 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 1
Liquor Store 9 5 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 1
Restaurant 12 12 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 24.36 27.07
Violent Crimes 5.03 8.51 6.58
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 58
Total Violations 93 98
Page 210
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1052002 1702 63 % 7% 23 %
1052003 1140 66 % 15 % 17 %
1052004 2577 44 % 5% 15 %
1053001 1959 84 % 11 % 9%
1053002 1704 34 % 25 % 42 %
1062002 1751 97 % 6% 1%
1063003 1910 50 % 11 % 42 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 211
Liquor License Map: DE MI PAIS MARKET
8375 N 7TH ST
Ü
Date: 5/12/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 212
Report
Summary
Applicant
Gilda R Schwendener Ralon, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
8375 N. 7th St. #C
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 10, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 207
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Mi Pueblo Market (Series 10)
751 E. Broadway Road, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Comunidad Latina (Series 10)
1616 E. Main St. #128, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
La Guatemalteca (Series 10)
4520 N. 19th Ave., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 7
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
Two letters protesting the issuance of this license have been received and are on file in
the Office of the City Clerk. The letters are from local residents. They feel that there
are sufficient liquor licenses in the area and do not need any more locations to
purchase alcohol from. They believe the issuance of this license will have a negative
impact on their neighborhood and do not support issuing it.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have the capability to hold a liquor license because I own various liquor license in
Mesa I have two liquor licences one since 2017 with no complaint. In the city of
Phoenix I have one also with no complaints. I work hard to make sure all my busniess
follow all the laws that involved in having a liquor license.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This is a conviniance store we especialies in central american products the
Page 208
neighborhood will benefits from this store to try all central american products and there
beers.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - De Mi Pais Market
Liquor License Map - De Mi Pais Market
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 209
Liquor License Data: DE MI PAIS MARKET
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 5 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 1
Liquor Store 9 5 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 1
Restaurant 12 12 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 24.36 27.07
Violent Crimes 5.03 8.51 6.58
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 58
Total Violations 93 98
Page 210
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1052002 1702 63 % 7% 23 %
1052003 1140 66 % 15 % 17 %
1052004 2577 44 % 5% 15 %
1053001 1959 84 % 11 % 9%
1053002 1704 34 % 25 % 42 %
1062002 1751 97 % 6% 1%
1063003 1910 50 % 11 % 42 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 211
Liquor License Map: DE MI PAIS MARKET
8375 N 7TH ST
Ü
Date: 5/12/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 212
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Bar
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 1207A392.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
2033 E. Camelback Road, Ste. A13
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 26, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Hopdoddy Burger Bar (Series 12)
11055 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale
Page 213
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff are be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 214
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 1207A392.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
2033 E. Camelback Road, Ste. A13
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 26, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Hopdoddy Burger Bar (Series 12)
11055 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale
Page 213
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff are be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 214
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 196402.
Summary
Applicant
Zindy Torres, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4909 E. Chandler Blvd., Ste. 511
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 215
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Tacos Calafia (Series 12)
8258 W. Thunderbird Road, #206, Peoria
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Tacos Calafia (Series 12)
17239 N. Litchfield Road, #68, Surprise
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Tacos Calafia (Series 12)
9897 W. McDowell Road, #755, Tolleson
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I'm in compliance with requisites neccesary to use a liquor license in my restaurant
business.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This restaurant will supply the community with a succesful restaurant offering
authentic mexican food.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Page 216
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Tacos Calafia
Liquor License Map - Tacos Calafia
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 217
Liquor License Data: TACOS CALAFIA
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 0
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 0
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 3
Hotel 11 1 1
Restaurant 12 23 11
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 56.23 112.20
Violent Crimes 10.06 8.59 15.81
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 4
Total Violations 94 11
Page 218
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1167121 2721 19 % 15 % 9%
1167123 2451 69 % 5% 8%
1167191 1679 87 % 3% 2%
1167192 1023 3% 7% 22 %
8104002 314 3% 25 % 12 %
9804001 13 0% 0% 82 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 219
Liquor License Map: TACOS CALAFIA
4909 E CHANDLER BLVD
Ü
Date: 6/3/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 220
Report
Summary
Applicant
Zindy Torres, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4909 E. Chandler Blvd., Ste. 511
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 215
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Tacos Calafia (Series 12)
8258 W. Thunderbird Road, #206, Peoria
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Tacos Calafia (Series 12)
17239 N. Litchfield Road, #68, Surprise
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Tacos Calafia (Series 12)
9897 W. McDowell Road, #755, Tolleson
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I'm in compliance with requisites neccesary to use a liquor license in my restaurant
business.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This restaurant will supply the community with a succesful restaurant offering
authentic mexican food.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Page 216
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Tacos Calafia
Liquor License Map - Tacos Calafia
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 217
Liquor License Data: TACOS CALAFIA
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 0
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 0
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 3
Hotel 11 1 1
Restaurant 12 23 11
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 56.23 112.20
Violent Crimes 10.06 8.59 15.81
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 4
Total Violations 94 11
Page 218
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1167121 2721 19 % 15 % 9%
1167123 2451 69 % 5% 8%
1167191 1679 87 % 3% 2%
1167192 1023 3% 7% 22 %
8104002 314 3% 25 % 12 %
9804001 13 0% 0% 82 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 219
Liquor License Map: TACOS CALAFIA
4909 E CHANDLER BLVD
Ü
Date: 6/3/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 220
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 198446.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 6 - Bar
Location
1 E. Washington St., Ste. 128
Zoning Classification: DTC - Business Core
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a bar. This location is currently licensed for
liquor sales with a different Series 6-Bar, liquor license.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Page 221
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff are trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Pigtails currently operates with a series 6 liquor license at this location. Applicant has
applied for a series 6 lottery license to be moved at a later date. Only one license will
be activated at the location.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Pigtails
Liquor License Map - Pigtails
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 222
Liquor License Data: PIGTAILS
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 3 1
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 9 6
Bar 6 45 28
Beer and Wine Bar 7 13 6
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 14 1
Hotel 11 7 5
Restaurant 12 94 46
Club 14 3 0
Crime Data
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 0 0
Total Violations
Page 223
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1140001 1831 25 % 20 % 47 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 224
Liquor License Map: PIGTAILS
1 E WASHINGTON ST
Ü
Date: 6/7/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 225
Report
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 6 - Bar
Location
1 E. Washington St., Ste. 128
Zoning Classification: DTC - Business Core
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a bar. This location is currently licensed for
liquor sales with a different Series 6-Bar, liquor license.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Page 221
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff are trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Pigtails currently operates with a series 6 liquor license at this location. Applicant has
applied for a series 6 lottery license to be moved at a later date. Only one license will
be activated at the location.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Pigtails
Liquor License Map - Pigtails
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 222
Liquor License Data: PIGTAILS
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 3 1
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 9 6
Bar 6 45 28
Beer and Wine Bar 7 13 6
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 14 1
Hotel 11 7 5
Restaurant 12 94 46
Club 14 3 0
Crime Data
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 0 0
Total Violations
Page 223
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1140001 1831 25 % 20 % 47 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 224
Liquor License Map: PIGTAILS
1 E WASHINGTON ST
Ü
Date: 6/7/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 225
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Lounge
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197008.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 6 - Bar
Location
747 W. Van Buren St.
Zoning Classification: DTC - Van Buren HP
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a bar. This location was not previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business has plans
to open in April 2023.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 226
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Thunderbird Lounge (Series 6)
710 W. Montecito Ave.
Calls for police service: 7
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Thundercat Lounge is an adaptive reuse project of a historic building. Applicant will
offer a relaxed, casual '80s-theme style setting to locals and visitors, and would like to
offer alcoholic beverages to its guests 21 and over.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Thundercat Lounge
Liquor License Map - Thundercat Lounge
Page 227
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 228
Liquor License Data: THUNDERCAT LOUNGE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 4 2
Government 5 6 0
Bar 6 44 9
Beer and Wine Bar 7 12 2
Liquor Store 9 3 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2
Hotel 11 7 1
Restaurant 12 93 12
Club 14 3 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 763.42 639.70
Violent Crimes 10.06 165.92 131.31
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 0 0
Total Violations
Page 228
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1129002 815 37 % 22 % 24 %
1129003 1372 4% 18 % 40 %
1129004 1325 47 % 24 % 52 %
1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
1143011 1389 22 % 15 % 57 %
1143022 1689 9% 31 % 48 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 229
Liquor License Map: THUNDERCAT LOUNGE
747 W VAN BUREN ST
Ü
Date: 6/3/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 230
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 197008.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 6 - Bar
Location
747 W. Van Buren St.
Zoning Classification: DTC - Van Buren HP
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a bar. This location was not previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business has plans
to open in April 2023.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 1, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 226
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Thunderbird Lounge (Series 6)
710 W. Montecito Ave.
Calls for police service: 7
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received,
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Thundercat Lounge is an adaptive reuse project of a historic building. Applicant will
offer a relaxed, casual '80s-theme style setting to locals and visitors, and would like to
offer alcoholic beverages to its guests 21 and over.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Thundercat Lounge
Liquor License Map - Thundercat Lounge
Page 227
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 228
Liquor License Data: THUNDERCAT LOUNGE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 4 2
Government 5 6 0
Bar 6 44 9
Beer and Wine Bar 7 12 2
Liquor Store 9 3 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2
Hotel 11 7 1
Restaurant 12 93 12
Club 14 3 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 763.42 639.70
Violent Crimes 10.06 165.92 131.31
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 0 0
Total Violations
Page 228
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1129002 815 37 % 22 % 24 %
1129003 1372 4% 18 % 40 %
1129004 1325 47 % 24 % 52 %
1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
1143011 1389 22 % 15 % 57 %
1143022 1689 9% 31 % 48 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 229
Liquor License Map: THUNDERCAT LOUNGE
747 W VAN BUREN ST
Ü
Date: 6/3/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 230
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Hilton Phoenix Airport North
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 198700.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
601 N. 44th St.
Zoning Classification: C-2 MR
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a hotel. This location was not previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 5, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 231
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for alcohol sales and
service. Managers and staff are trained, or will be, in the techniques of legal and
responsible sales and service.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Hampton Inn by Hilton Phoenix Airport North has been popular business and personal
travel destination for many years. Applicant would like to offer alcoholic beverages to
its guests 21 and over to those who would like to purchase beer and wine for
consumption off premises.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Hampton Inn by Hilton Phoenix Airport North
Liquor License Map - Hampton Inn by Hilton Phoenix Airport North
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 232
Liquor License Data: HAMPTON INN BY HILTON PHOENIX
AIRPORT NORTH
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 3 0
Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 1
Liquor Store 9 5 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 4
Hotel 11 7 5
Restaurant 12 2 0
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 157.53 214.43
Violent Crimes 10.06 38.95 51.48
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 0 0
Total Violations
Page 233
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1112021 1913 6% 18 % 38 %
1112031 1003 0% 24 % 37 %
1137001 634 0% 38 % 26 %
1137002 1578 21 % 11 % 59 %
1137003 1101 31 % 18 % 11 %
1137004 2372 7% 27 % 43 %
1137005 1280 14 % 32 % 52 %
1138011 1007 13 % 30 % 31 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 234
Liquor License Map: HAMPTON INN BY HILTON PHOENIX AIRPORT NORTH
601 N 44TH ST
Ü
Date: 6/9/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 235
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 198700.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
601 N. 44th St.
Zoning Classification: C-2 MR
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a hotel. This location was not previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Aug. 5, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 231
Public Opinion
At the time this agenda was finalized, no protest or support letters had been received
however the 20-day public comment period had not yet concluded.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for alcohol sales and
service. Managers and staff are trained, or will be, in the techniques of legal and
responsible sales and service.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Hampton Inn by Hilton Phoenix Airport North has been popular business and personal
travel destination for many years. Applicant would like to offer alcoholic beverages to
its guests 21 and over to those who would like to purchase beer and wine for
consumption off premises.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff makes no recommendation regarding this application pending the completion of
the departmental reviews and the posting process.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Hampton Inn by Hilton Phoenix Airport North
Liquor License Map - Hampton Inn by Hilton Phoenix Airport North
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 232
Liquor License Data: HAMPTON INN BY HILTON PHOENIX
AIRPORT NORTH
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 3 0
Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 1
Liquor Store 9 5 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 4
Hotel 11 7 5
Restaurant 12 2 0
Club 14 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 53.49 157.53 214.43
Violent Crimes 10.06 38.95 51.48
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 0 0
Total Violations
Page 233
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1112021 1913 6% 18 % 38 %
1112031 1003 0% 24 % 37 %
1137001 634 0% 38 % 26 %
1137002 1578 21 % 11 % 59 %
1137003 1101 31 % 18 % 11 %
1137004 2372 7% 27 % 43 %
1137005 1280 14 % 32 % 52 %
1138011 1007 13 % 30 % 31 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 234
Liquor License Map: HAMPTON INN BY HILTON PHOENIX AIRPORT NORTH
601 N 44TH ST
Ü
Date: 6/9/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 235
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Liquor License - Aiello's
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 198196.
Summary
Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
777 E. Thunderbird Road, Ste. 100
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 18, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 236
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We will ensure our employees attend the title 4 liquor law training courses offered by
ALIC.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This restaurant has been operational for several years. We would like to continue to
offer the area the same great food with adult beverages of their choice.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends disapproval of this application due to a Finance Department
recommendation for disapproval. Staff also notes that the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Aiello's
Liquor License Map - Aiello's
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 237
Liquor License Data: AIELLO'S
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 1 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 4
Restaurant 12 10 10
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 4.90 13.80
Violent Crimes 5.03 0.76 2.12
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 12
Total Violations 93 17
Page 238
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1036053 797 92 % 20 % 1%
1036073 896 98 % 4% 1%
1036113 2247 95 % 0% 1%
1036142 1037 91 % 4% 2%
1036151 906 52 % 16 % 12 %
1037012 1871 58 % 17 % 5%
1037023 1050 23 % 4% 11 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 239
Liquor License Map: AIELLO'S
777 E THUNDERBIRD RD
Ü
Date: 5/20/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 240
PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-48825) (Items 49-60)
Ordinance S-48825 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-13.
49 Technology Partners, Inc.
For $20,942.00 in payment authority to purchase two custom-built,
computers for conducting law enforcement investigations for the Police
Department. The Internet Crimes Against Children Detail, of the Family
Investigations Bureau, requires highly specialized computers configured
to run the sophisticated algorithms used by forensic investigative
software. Off-the-shelf computer systems do not have the adequate
resources or technical capabilities to run this specialized software. The
forensic computers are specifically designed for law enforcement needs
and will replace computers purchased over six years ago.
50 Clerk Retail, Inc. doing business as Grocery TV
For $39,312.00 in payment authority to purchase one year of public
information digital advertising services through dynamic digital advertising
in supermarkets for the Communications Office. The advertising service
offer displays that are motion-activated and run short-form content without
audio for customers in grocery checkout aisles. The type of advertising
will help reach under-served populations in the community and share
relevant information, such as community meetings for COVID-19
resources, budget development, water rates, etc.
Page 241
51 Lucas Holdings, LLC doing business as Lucas Color
Card
For $60,000.00 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or
about July 15, 2022, for a term of five years for plastic library cards and
key tags for the Library Department. The Library cards and key tags will
be used as a form of customer membership identification and give
customers privileges to borrow library print materials, access databases,
eLibrary resources, public access to computer use, and easier check-out.
52 Biddle Consulting Group, Inc.
For $41,223.00 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or
about July 1, 2022, for a term of five years for CritiCall testing software for
the Police, Aviation and Fire departments' communication centers. The
software is used to test potential applicants multi-tasking, recollection and
data collections skills to see if the applicant qualifies to move on to the
next step of the hiring process. By working collaboratively, the Police,
Aviation and Fire departments have allowed the City to save money by
purchasing just one annual license that will be shared with no user limits.
Online testing is available allowing an applicant to test from the comfort of
their own home both locally or out of state. The Biddle Consulting Group,
Inc. is the publisher and sole distributor of the license for the CritiCall
software.
53 QCM Technologies, Inc.
For $501,500.00 in payment authority to purchase IBM software and
support including disaster recovery services for the Information
Technology Services Department in support of the Finance Department.
The licensing and support renewal is needed for the ongoing licensing
and maintenance of the technology infrastructure supporting SAP, for the
City's financial and procurement system.
54 Christy Signs
For $77,500.00 in payment authority to purchase specialty art services for
the Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture Department. The funds will be
used to fabricate and refurbish outdoor display cases and shade
structures, update lighting, replace clear protective plexiglass, as well as
install new art and safety resource information panels of the Melrose
Curve Outdoor Public Art Gallery between 7th Avenue and Glenrosa
Page 242
Avenue. The current artwork was last updated in 2018. Christy Signs is
the qualified local vendor that originally fabricated the existing outdoor
display cases and other elements.
55 CCR Furniture Upholstery Cleaners Inc.
For $25,000.00 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or
about July 1, 2022, for a term of five years, for upholstered and wood
furniture cleaning and repair service for the Phoenix Convention Center.
The contract will be used on an as-needed basis. The contract includes all
labor and materials needed to repair furniture including upholstery and
wood surfaces and to clean upholstered surfaces for the Phoenix
Convention Center venues.
56 NABCO Systems LLC
For $17,354.71 in payment authority to purchase a one-day Arizona
Public Safety Bomb Technicians (PSBT) training in the use and
maintenance of the State's NABCO Total Containment Vessels (TCV) for
up to 20 PSBTs for the Police Department. The course is custom for the
State of Arizona designed around the four TCV's in the state. Funding is
available in the FY2021 UASI grant.
57 Motorola Solutions, Inc. doing business as Vigilant
Solutions, LLC
For $9,040.00 in payment authority for the annual subscription renewal for
the Law Enforcement Archival and Reporting Network (LEARN) database,
for the Homeland Defense Bureau and the Phoenix Police Department.
The LEARN database is an online analytic platform that allows license
plate data and images to be aggregated and analyzed and provides law
enforcement agencies with the ability to manage hotlists, query historical
license plate reader data, and use sophisticated analytics for advanced
investigations. LEARN is a hosted solution that allows data sharing and
interoperability with other law enforcement agencies nationwide. Funds
are available in the Police Department's budget.
58 Public Safety Personnel Retirement System
For $145,300.00 in annual payment authority to purchase the Fiscal Year
2022-23 employer cost of the Firefighter and Peace Officer Cancer
Insurance Policy Program for the Police Department.
Page 243
59 Settlement of Claim(s) Guerra v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $32,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in Guerra
v. City of Phoenix, 21-0575-001, AU, BI, PD, for the Finance Department
pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement for a
bodily injury and property damage claim arising out of a police incident on
July 3, 2021.
60 Settlement of Claim(s) Rivera-Albarado v. City of
Phoenix
To make payment of up to $37,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in
Rivera-Albarado v. City of Phoenix, 21-0172-001, AU, BI, for the
Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a
settlement for a bodily injury claim arising out of a police incident on Aug.
4, 2021.
Page 244
Report
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 198196.
Summary
Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
777 E. Thunderbird Road, Ste. 100
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is July 18, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 236
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We will ensure our employees attend the title 4 liquor law training courses offered by
ALIC.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This restaurant has been operational for several years. We would like to continue to
offer the area the same great food with adult beverages of their choice.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends disapproval of this application due to a Finance Department
recommendation for disapproval. Staff also notes that the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Aiello's
Liquor License Map - Aiello's
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 237
Liquor License Data: AIELLO'S
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 1 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 4
Restaurant 12 10 10
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 14.45 4.90 13.80
Violent Crimes 5.03 0.76 2.12
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 53 12
Total Violations 93 17
Page 238
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1036053 797 92 % 20 % 1%
1036073 896 98 % 4% 1%
1036113 2247 95 % 0% 1%
1036142 1037 91 % 4% 2%
1036151 906 52 % 16 % 12 %
1037012 1871 58 % 17 % 5%
1037023 1050 23 % 4% 11 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 239
Liquor License Map: AIELLO'S
777 E THUNDERBIRD RD
Ü
Date: 5/20/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 240
PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-48825) (Items 49-60)
Ordinance S-48825 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-13.
49 Technology Partners, Inc.
For $20,942.00 in payment authority to purchase two custom-built,
computers for conducting law enforcement investigations for the Police
Department. The Internet Crimes Against Children Detail, of the Family
Investigations Bureau, requires highly specialized computers configured
to run the sophisticated algorithms used by forensic investigative
software. Off-the-shelf computer systems do not have the adequate
resources or technical capabilities to run this specialized software. The
forensic computers are specifically designed for law enforcement needs
and will replace computers purchased over six years ago.
50 Clerk Retail, Inc. doing business as Grocery TV
For $39,312.00 in payment authority to purchase one year of public
information digital advertising services through dynamic digital advertising
in supermarkets for the Communications Office. The advertising service
offer displays that are motion-activated and run short-form content without
audio for customers in grocery checkout aisles. The type of advertising
will help reach under-served populations in the community and share
relevant information, such as community meetings for COVID-19
resources, budget development, water rates, etc.
Page 241
51 Lucas Holdings, LLC doing business as Lucas Color
Card
For $60,000.00 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or
about July 15, 2022, for a term of five years for plastic library cards and
key tags for the Library Department. The Library cards and key tags will
be used as a form of customer membership identification and give
customers privileges to borrow library print materials, access databases,
eLibrary resources, public access to computer use, and easier check-out.
52 Biddle Consulting Group, Inc.
For $41,223.00 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or
about July 1, 2022, for a term of five years for CritiCall testing software for
the Police, Aviation and Fire departments' communication centers. The
software is used to test potential applicants multi-tasking, recollection and
data collections skills to see if the applicant qualifies to move on to the
next step of the hiring process. By working collaboratively, the Police,
Aviation and Fire departments have allowed the City to save money by
purchasing just one annual license that will be shared with no user limits.
Online testing is available allowing an applicant to test from the comfort of
their own home both locally or out of state. The Biddle Consulting Group,
Inc. is the publisher and sole distributor of the license for the CritiCall
software.
53 QCM Technologies, Inc.
For $501,500.00 in payment authority to purchase IBM software and
support including disaster recovery services for the Information
Technology Services Department in support of the Finance Department.
The licensing and support renewal is needed for the ongoing licensing
and maintenance of the technology infrastructure supporting SAP, for the
City's financial and procurement system.
54 Christy Signs
For $77,500.00 in payment authority to purchase specialty art services for
the Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture Department. The funds will be
used to fabricate and refurbish outdoor display cases and shade
structures, update lighting, replace clear protective plexiglass, as well as
install new art and safety resource information panels of the Melrose
Curve Outdoor Public Art Gallery between 7th Avenue and Glenrosa
Page 242
Avenue. The current artwork was last updated in 2018. Christy Signs is
the qualified local vendor that originally fabricated the existing outdoor
display cases and other elements.
55 CCR Furniture Upholstery Cleaners Inc.
For $25,000.00 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or
about July 1, 2022, for a term of five years, for upholstered and wood
furniture cleaning and repair service for the Phoenix Convention Center.
The contract will be used on an as-needed basis. The contract includes all
labor and materials needed to repair furniture including upholstery and
wood surfaces and to clean upholstered surfaces for the Phoenix
Convention Center venues.
56 NABCO Systems LLC
For $17,354.71 in payment authority to purchase a one-day Arizona
Public Safety Bomb Technicians (PSBT) training in the use and
maintenance of the State's NABCO Total Containment Vessels (TCV) for
up to 20 PSBTs for the Police Department. The course is custom for the
State of Arizona designed around the four TCV's in the state. Funding is
available in the FY2021 UASI grant.
57 Motorola Solutions, Inc. doing business as Vigilant
Solutions, LLC
For $9,040.00 in payment authority for the annual subscription renewal for
the Law Enforcement Archival and Reporting Network (LEARN) database,
for the Homeland Defense Bureau and the Phoenix Police Department.
The LEARN database is an online analytic platform that allows license
plate data and images to be aggregated and analyzed and provides law
enforcement agencies with the ability to manage hotlists, query historical
license plate reader data, and use sophisticated analytics for advanced
investigations. LEARN is a hosted solution that allows data sharing and
interoperability with other law enforcement agencies nationwide. Funds
are available in the Police Department's budget.
58 Public Safety Personnel Retirement System
For $145,300.00 in annual payment authority to purchase the Fiscal Year
2022-23 employer cost of the Firefighter and Peace Officer Cancer
Insurance Policy Program for the Police Department.
Page 243
59 Settlement of Claim(s) Guerra v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $32,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in Guerra
v. City of Phoenix, 21-0575-001, AU, BI, PD, for the Finance Department
pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement for a
bodily injury and property damage claim arising out of a police incident on
July 3, 2021.
60 Settlement of Claim(s) Rivera-Albarado v. City of
Phoenix
To make payment of up to $37,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in
Rivera-Albarado v. City of Phoenix, 21-0172-001, AU, BI, for the
Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a
settlement for a bodily injury claim arising out of a police incident on Aug.
4, 2021.
Page 244
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Public Hearing on Adoption of Property Tax Levy for 2022-23 Fiscal Year
As required by State statute, request the City Council hold a public hearing prior to the
adoption of a property tax levy for the City of Phoenix for 2022-23.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The proposed 2022-23 property tax levy reflects actions taken by the Council on the
budget at the May 17, 2022 Policy meeting, at the June 1, 2022 Formal meeting to
adopt the tentative 2022-23 budget, and at the June 15, 2022 Formal meeting to adopt
the final 2022-23 budget. At the June 15, 2022 Formal meeting, a public hearing on the
proposed primary property tax levy was held in accordance with statutory truth-in-
taxation requirements.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 245
Report
As required by State statute, request the City Council hold a public hearing prior to the
adoption of a property tax levy for the City of Phoenix for 2022-23.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The proposed 2022-23 property tax levy reflects actions taken by the Council on the
budget at the May 17, 2022 Policy meeting, at the June 1, 2022 Formal meeting to
adopt the tentative 2022-23 budget, and at the June 15, 2022 Formal meeting to adopt
the final 2022-23 budget. At the June 15, 2022 Formal meeting, a public hearing on the
proposed primary property tax levy was held in accordance with statutory truth-in-
taxation requirements.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 245
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Adoption of Property Tax Levy for 2022-23 Fiscal Year (Ordinance S-48853)
An ordinance levying separate amounts to be raised for primary and secondary
property tax levies upon each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of the assessed valuation
of the property subject to taxation within the City of Phoenix for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2023.
Summary
The ordinance (Attachment A) provides for a primary property tax rate resulting in a
levy of $201,206,519 (a General Fund revenue source) equating to a rate of $1.2989
per $100 of assessed valuation, including $0.08 for maintenance of parks and
playgrounds and $0.2989 for the operation and maintenance of libraries; and an
estimated secondary property tax levy of $126,108,420 (used only for debt service)
equating to a rate of $0.8141 per $100 of assessed valuation. The total rate of $2.1130
is lower than the total 2021-22 rate of $2.1196.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The proposed 2022-23 property tax levy reflects actions taken by the Council on the
budget at the May 17, 2022 Policy meeting, at the June 1, 2022 Formal meeting to
adopt the tentative 2022-23 budget, and at the June 15, 2022 Formal meeting to adopt
the final 2022-23 budget. At the June 15, 2022 Formal meeting, a public hearing on the
proposed primary property tax levy was held in accordance with statutory truth-in-
taxation requirements.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 246
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE S-#####
AN ORDINANCE LEVYING SEPARATE AMOUNTS TO BE
RAISED FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX
LEVIES UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00)
OF THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY SUBJECT
TO TAXATION WITHIN THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2023.
______________
WHEREAS, by the provisions of the City Charter an ordinance levying
taxes for the fiscal year 2022-23 is required to be finally adopted not later than the last
regular Council meeting in July of said fiscal year, which date complies with State law
requirements; and
WHEREAS, the County of Maricopa is now the tax assessing and
collecting authority for the City of Phoenix, the City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a
certified copy of this tax levy ordinance to the Assessor and the Board of Supervisors of
Maricopa County, Arizona as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PHOENIX as follows:
SECTION 1. There is hereby levied on each ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($100.00) of the limited assessed value of all property, real, personal and possessory
interest, within the corporate limits of the City of Phoenix, except such property as may
-1- Ordinance S-#####
Page 247
be by law exempt from taxation, a primary property tax rate equating to $1.2989 which
is sufficient to generate a primary property levy of TWO HUNDRED AND ONE
MILLION, TWO HUNDRED AND SIX THOUSAND, AND FIVE HUNDRED AND
NINETEEN DOLLARS ($201,206,519), an amount within the maximum allowable
primary tax levy under the Arizona Constitution. The primary tax levy is allocated into
the following amounts or rates for each of the following purposes:
(a) For the purpose of providing funds for the GENERAL MUNICIPAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES of the City, in accordance with Chapter XVIII -
Section 8 of the City Charter, a tax rate of $1.00 per ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($100.00) of limited assessed valuation of all taxable real, personal and possessory
interest property in the City of Phoenix, which includes $0.08 per ONE HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($100.00) of such limited assessed valuation for the purpose of providing
funds for the OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS, in
accordance with Chapter XXIII - Section 2 - Subsection 2 of the City Charter.
(b) For the purpose of providing funds for the OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF LIBRARIES, in accordance with Chapter XVIII - Section 11 of the
City Charter, a tax rate of $0.2989 per ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) of limited
assessed valuation of all taxable real, personal and possessory interest property in the
SECTION 2. In addition to the property tax levy for primary purposes set
in Section 1 above, there is hereby levied on each ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($100.00) of the limited assessed value of all property, real, personal and possessory
interest, within the corporate limits of the City of Phoenix, except such property as may
-2- Ordinance S-#####
Page 248
by law be exempt from taxation, a secondary tax rate of $0.8141 for secondary
purposes for paying principal of and interest on or redemption charges on general
obligation bonds of the City of Phoenix.
SECTION 3. The primary property tax rate as calculated in Section 1 and
the secondary tax rate as calculated in Section 2 shall equal a combined tax rate of
$2.1130.
SECTION 4. Failure by the County officials of Maricopa County, Arizona
to properly return the delinquent list, any irregularity in assessments or omissions in the
same, or any irregularity in any proceedings shall not invalidate such proceedings or
invalidate any title conveyed by a tax deed; failure or neglect of any officer or officers to
timely perform any of the duties assigned to him or to them shall not invalidate any
proceedings or any deed or sale pursuant thereto; the questioned validity of
assessment or levy of taxes or of the judgment of sale by which collection of the same
may be enforced shall not affect the lien of the City upon such property for the
delinquent taxes unpaid thereon; overcharge as to part of the taxes or of costs shall not
invalidate any proceedings for the collection of taxes or the foreclosure of the lien
therefore or a sale of the property under such foreclosures; and all acts of officers de
facto shall be valid as if performed by officers de jure.
-3- Ordinance S-#####
Page 249
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix on this 1st day of July, 2022.
_________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Acting City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
City Manager
-4- Ordinance S-#####
Page 250
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
2022-23 LEGAL LIMIT
PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR PRIMARY PURPOSES
A.R.S. § 42-17051, Subsection A
1. Maximum allowable levy for the prior year $ 193,314,260
2. The above figure increased by two percent (2%) 197,180,545
3. Current Assessed Value of last year’s property 15,180,933,028
4. A. “3” divided by 100 151,809,330
B. Maximum Allowable Tax Rate equals - “2” divided by “4A”
($197,180,545 $151,809,330) 1.2989
5. Estimated Current Assessed Value 15,490,531,934
6. A. Current Assessed Value divided by 100 154,905,319
B. Levy equals - “4B” multiplied by “6A” 201,206,519
($1.2989 X $154,905,319)
Estimated over collections of the 2021-22 primary
property tax levy will reduce this estimate as follows:
7. A. Estimated over collections of 2021-22 primary levy -0-
B. Maximum Allowable Levy Limit for 2022-23 $ 201,206,519
8. Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit and Tax Rate:
A. Allowable Levy Limit for 2022-23 $ 201,206,519
B. Accepted Torts -0-
C. Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit $ 201,206,519
D. Adjusted Allowable Tax Rate - “8C” divided by “6A”
($201,206,519 $154,905,319) 1.2989
2022-23 Primary Levy $ 201,206,519
2022-23 Primary Tax Rate 1.2989
-5- Ordinance S-#####
Page 251
Report
An ordinance levying separate amounts to be raised for primary and secondary
property tax levies upon each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of the assessed valuation
of the property subject to taxation within the City of Phoenix for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2023.
Summary
The ordinance (Attachment A) provides for a primary property tax rate resulting in a
levy of $201,206,519 (a General Fund revenue source) equating to a rate of $1.2989
per $100 of assessed valuation, including $0.08 for maintenance of parks and
playgrounds and $0.2989 for the operation and maintenance of libraries; and an
estimated secondary property tax levy of $126,108,420 (used only for debt service)
equating to a rate of $0.8141 per $100 of assessed valuation. The total rate of $2.1130
is lower than the total 2021-22 rate of $2.1196.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The proposed 2022-23 property tax levy reflects actions taken by the Council on the
budget at the May 17, 2022 Policy meeting, at the June 1, 2022 Formal meeting to
adopt the tentative 2022-23 budget, and at the June 15, 2022 Formal meeting to adopt
the final 2022-23 budget. At the June 15, 2022 Formal meeting, a public hearing on the
proposed primary property tax levy was held in accordance with statutory truth-in-
taxation requirements.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 246
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE S-#####
AN ORDINANCE LEVYING SEPARATE AMOUNTS TO BE
RAISED FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PROPERTY TAX
LEVIES UPON EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00)
OF THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY SUBJECT
TO TAXATION WITHIN THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2023.
______________
WHEREAS, by the provisions of the City Charter an ordinance levying
taxes for the fiscal year 2022-23 is required to be finally adopted not later than the last
regular Council meeting in July of said fiscal year, which date complies with State law
requirements; and
WHEREAS, the County of Maricopa is now the tax assessing and
collecting authority for the City of Phoenix, the City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a
certified copy of this tax levy ordinance to the Assessor and the Board of Supervisors of
Maricopa County, Arizona as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PHOENIX as follows:
SECTION 1. There is hereby levied on each ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($100.00) of the limited assessed value of all property, real, personal and possessory
interest, within the corporate limits of the City of Phoenix, except such property as may
-1- Ordinance S-#####
Page 247
be by law exempt from taxation, a primary property tax rate equating to $1.2989 which
is sufficient to generate a primary property levy of TWO HUNDRED AND ONE
MILLION, TWO HUNDRED AND SIX THOUSAND, AND FIVE HUNDRED AND
NINETEEN DOLLARS ($201,206,519), an amount within the maximum allowable
primary tax levy under the Arizona Constitution. The primary tax levy is allocated into
the following amounts or rates for each of the following purposes:
(a) For the purpose of providing funds for the GENERAL MUNICIPAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES of the City, in accordance with Chapter XVIII -
Section 8 of the City Charter, a tax rate of $1.00 per ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($100.00) of limited assessed valuation of all taxable real, personal and possessory
interest property in the City of Phoenix, which includes $0.08 per ONE HUNDRED
DOLLARS ($100.00) of such limited assessed valuation for the purpose of providing
funds for the OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS, in
accordance with Chapter XXIII - Section 2 - Subsection 2 of the City Charter.
(b) For the purpose of providing funds for the OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF LIBRARIES, in accordance with Chapter XVIII - Section 11 of the
City Charter, a tax rate of $0.2989 per ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) of limited
assessed valuation of all taxable real, personal and possessory interest property in the
SECTION 2. In addition to the property tax levy for primary purposes set
in Section 1 above, there is hereby levied on each ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($100.00) of the limited assessed value of all property, real, personal and possessory
interest, within the corporate limits of the City of Phoenix, except such property as may
-2- Ordinance S-#####
Page 248
by law be exempt from taxation, a secondary tax rate of $0.8141 for secondary
purposes for paying principal of and interest on or redemption charges on general
obligation bonds of the City of Phoenix.
SECTION 3. The primary property tax rate as calculated in Section 1 and
the secondary tax rate as calculated in Section 2 shall equal a combined tax rate of
$2.1130.
SECTION 4. Failure by the County officials of Maricopa County, Arizona
to properly return the delinquent list, any irregularity in assessments or omissions in the
same, or any irregularity in any proceedings shall not invalidate such proceedings or
invalidate any title conveyed by a tax deed; failure or neglect of any officer or officers to
timely perform any of the duties assigned to him or to them shall not invalidate any
proceedings or any deed or sale pursuant thereto; the questioned validity of
assessment or levy of taxes or of the judgment of sale by which collection of the same
may be enforced shall not affect the lien of the City upon such property for the
delinquent taxes unpaid thereon; overcharge as to part of the taxes or of costs shall not
invalidate any proceedings for the collection of taxes or the foreclosure of the lien
therefore or a sale of the property under such foreclosures; and all acts of officers de
facto shall be valid as if performed by officers de jure.
-3- Ordinance S-#####
Page 249
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix on this 1st day of July, 2022.
_________________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Acting City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
City Manager
-4- Ordinance S-#####
Page 250
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
2022-23 LEGAL LIMIT
PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR PRIMARY PURPOSES
A.R.S. § 42-17051, Subsection A
1. Maximum allowable levy for the prior year $ 193,314,260
2. The above figure increased by two percent (2%) 197,180,545
3. Current Assessed Value of last year’s property 15,180,933,028
4. A. “3” divided by 100 151,809,330
B. Maximum Allowable Tax Rate equals - “2” divided by “4A”
($197,180,545 $151,809,330) 1.2989
5. Estimated Current Assessed Value 15,490,531,934
6. A. Current Assessed Value divided by 100 154,905,319
B. Levy equals - “4B” multiplied by “6A” 201,206,519
($1.2989 X $154,905,319)
Estimated over collections of the 2021-22 primary
property tax levy will reduce this estimate as follows:
7. A. Estimated over collections of 2021-22 primary levy -0-
B. Maximum Allowable Levy Limit for 2022-23 $ 201,206,519
8. Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit and Tax Rate:
A. Allowable Levy Limit for 2022-23 $ 201,206,519
B. Accepted Torts -0-
C. Adjusted Allowable Levy Limit $ 201,206,519
D. Adjusted Allowable Tax Rate - “8C” divided by “6A”
($201,206,519 $154,905,319) 1.2989
2022-23 Primary Levy $ 201,206,519
2022-23 Primary Tax Rate 1.2989
-5- Ordinance S-#####
Page 251
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for City Council to Call to Meet in Executive Session on Specific Dates
through December 2022
Request for the City Council to call meetings for the purpose of holding an Executive
Session pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, section 38-431.03.A, on the following
dates at Noon in the Central Conference Room, 12th Floor of Phoenix City Hall, 200
W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona.
· Sept. 13
· Sept. 27
· Oct. 18
· Nov. 15
· Dec. 6
Public Outreach
The Notice and Agenda for these Executive Sessions will be posted no later than 24
hours before each scheduled meeting.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 252
Report
through December 2022
Request for the City Council to call meetings for the purpose of holding an Executive
Session pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, section 38-431.03.A, on the following
dates at Noon in the Central Conference Room, 12th Floor of Phoenix City Hall, 200
W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona.
· Sept. 13
· Sept. 27
· Oct. 18
· Nov. 15
· Dec. 6
Public Outreach
The Notice and Agenda for these Executive Sessions will be posted no later than 24
hours before each scheduled meeting.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 252
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Acceptance of Easements for Access, Drainage and Storm Drainage Purposes
(Ordinance S-48839)
Request for the City Council to accept easements for access, drainage and storm
drainage purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
Accepting the property interest below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.
Easement (a)
Applicant: BVFD North Phoenix Owner, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Access
Location: 3939 W. Arroyo Norte Drive
File: FN 220041
Council District: 1
Easement (b)
Applicant: BVFD North Phoenix Owner, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 3939 W. Arroyo Norte Drive
File: FN 220041
Council District: 1
Easement (c)
Applicant: BVFD North Phoenix Owner, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Storm Drainage
Location: 3939 W. Arroyo Norte Drive
File: FN 220041
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Alan
Stephenson and the Planning and Development and Finance departments.
Page 253
Report
(Ordinance S-48839)
Request for the City Council to accept easements for access, drainage and storm
drainage purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
Accepting the property interest below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.
Easement (a)
Applicant: BVFD North Phoenix Owner, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Access
Location: 3939 W. Arroyo Norte Drive
File: FN 220041
Council District: 1
Easement (b)
Applicant: BVFD North Phoenix Owner, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 3939 W. Arroyo Norte Drive
File: FN 220041
Council District: 1
Easement (c)
Applicant: BVFD North Phoenix Owner, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Storm Drainage
Location: 3939 W. Arroyo Norte Drive
File: FN 220041
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Alan
Stephenson and the Planning and Development and Finance departments.
Page 253
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Acceptance and Dedication of Easements and Deeds for Sidewalk, Public Utility
and Roadway Purposes (Ordinance S-48840)
Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements and deeds for
sidewalk, public utility and roadway purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.
Easement (a)
Applicant: MSH Investments, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 635 W. Glenrosa Ave.
File: FN 220045
Council District: 4
Easement (b)
Applicant: Phoenix Native on Camelback, LP, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 3928 W. Camelback Road
File: FN 220043
Council District: 5
Easement (c)
Applicant: Holly Joy Mueller, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 4337 E. Calle Feliz
File: FN 220044
Council District: 6
Easement (d)
Applicant: Donald Van Hofwegen and Ingrid Van Hofwegen, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Page 254
Location: 9801 W. Broadway Road
File: FN 220029
Council District: 7
Deed (e)
Applicant: Donald Van Hofwegen and Ingrid Van Hofwegen, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 9801 W. Broadway Road
File: FN 220029
Council District: 7
Easement (f)
Applicant: PHX Buckeye Partners, LLC; HP Buckeye, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 3836 W. Buckeye Road
File: FN 220035
Council District: 7
Deed (g)
Applicant: SWAG PHX, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 2804 E. Broadway Road
File: FN 220039
Council District: 8
Deed (h)
Applicant: Diocesan Council for The Society of St. Vincent de Paul Diocese Phoenix,
its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 320 W. Watkins St.
File: FN 220046
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Alan
Stephenson and the Planning and Development and Finance departments.
Page 255
Report
and Roadway Purposes (Ordinance S-48840)
Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements and deeds for
sidewalk, public utility and roadway purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.
Easement (a)
Applicant: MSH Investments, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 635 W. Glenrosa Ave.
File: FN 220045
Council District: 4
Easement (b)
Applicant: Phoenix Native on Camelback, LP, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 3928 W. Camelback Road
File: FN 220043
Council District: 5
Easement (c)
Applicant: Holly Joy Mueller, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 4337 E. Calle Feliz
File: FN 220044
Council District: 6
Easement (d)
Applicant: Donald Van Hofwegen and Ingrid Van Hofwegen, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Page 254
Location: 9801 W. Broadway Road
File: FN 220029
Council District: 7
Deed (e)
Applicant: Donald Van Hofwegen and Ingrid Van Hofwegen, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 9801 W. Broadway Road
File: FN 220029
Council District: 7
Easement (f)
Applicant: PHX Buckeye Partners, LLC; HP Buckeye, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 3836 W. Buckeye Road
File: FN 220035
Council District: 7
Deed (g)
Applicant: SWAG PHX, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 2804 E. Broadway Road
File: FN 220039
Council District: 8
Deed (h)
Applicant: Diocesan Council for The Society of St. Vincent de Paul Diocese Phoenix,
its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 320 W. Watkins St.
File: FN 220046
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Alan
Stephenson and the Planning and Development and Finance departments.
Page 255
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Custodial Services Fire Department - Requirements Contract RFP 22-038 -
Request for Award (Ordinance S-48832)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Bio Janitorial Services, Inc., to provide custodial services for the Fire Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $2,750,000.
Summary
This contract will provide custodial services to maintain 21 facilities in a clean and
hygienic state to promote the health and safety of employees and members of the
public. Custodial services support the City Manager's strategic plan to provide public
safety workers with facilities necessary to professionally meet City and regional public
safety needs and best serve residents.
Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.
Thirteen vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An
evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria
with a maximum possible point total of 1,000:
Method of Approach (0-400 points)
Qualifications and Experience (0-300 points)
Capacity (0-200 points)
Pricing (0-100 points)
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor(s):
Bio Janitorial Services, Inc. - 808 points
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, for a two-year term with three one-
Page 256
year options to extend.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $2,750,000. Funding is available in the
Fire Department's operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 257
Report
Request for Award (Ordinance S-48832)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Bio Janitorial Services, Inc., to provide custodial services for the Fire Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $2,750,000.
Summary
This contract will provide custodial services to maintain 21 facilities in a clean and
hygienic state to promote the health and safety of employees and members of the
public. Custodial services support the City Manager's strategic plan to provide public
safety workers with facilities necessary to professionally meet City and regional public
safety needs and best serve residents.
Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.
Thirteen vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An
evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria
with a maximum possible point total of 1,000:
Method of Approach (0-400 points)
Qualifications and Experience (0-300 points)
Capacity (0-200 points)
Pricing (0-100 points)
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor(s):
Bio Janitorial Services, Inc. - 808 points
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, for a two-year term with three one-
Page 256
year options to extend.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $2,750,000. Funding is available in the
Fire Department's operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 257
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Industrial and Medical Gases- COOP 22-084- Request for Award (Ordinance S-
48835)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. to provide industrial and medical gases for citywide use.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $909,995.
Summary
This contract provides all City departments the ability to purchase a variety of gases
such as oxygen, acetylene, argon, hydrogen and carbon dioxide tanks. These gases
and tanks are used for medical emergencies and welding purposes. The following
contract is necessary to respond immediately to any welding or medical emergencies
throughout the City of Phoenix.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Special Circumstances
Alternative Competition. Use of this cooperative contract provides a broad range of
industrial and medical gases which are key to maintaining operations citywide.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about August 1, 2022 for a 5-year term with no options to
extend.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $909,995 for the 5-year aggregate term.
Funding is available in various department budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.
Page 258
Report
48835)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. to provide industrial and medical gases for citywide use.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $909,995.
Summary
This contract provides all City departments the ability to purchase a variety of gases
such as oxygen, acetylene, argon, hydrogen and carbon dioxide tanks. These gases
and tanks are used for medical emergencies and welding purposes. The following
contract is necessary to respond immediately to any welding or medical emergencies
throughout the City of Phoenix.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Special Circumstances
Alternative Competition. Use of this cooperative contract provides a broad range of
industrial and medical gases which are key to maintaining operations citywide.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about August 1, 2022 for a 5-year term with no options to
extend.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $909,995 for the 5-year aggregate term.
Funding is available in various department budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.
Page 258
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Auditing and Consulting Services - Requirements Contract - MCC 180241 D -
Amendment (Ordinance S-48836)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 150640 with Heinfeld, Meech, & Co, P.C. to authorize the Finance
Department use of the contract. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$120,000.
Summary
This contract is one of several cooperative contracts previously adopted for use by the
City Auditor Department for auditing and consulting services. This request will add the
Finance Department as an authorized user of the contract to provide the Financial
Accounting and Reporting Division external expertise for auditing financial statements
for Healthcare Benefits Trust, Long Term Disability Trust (LTD), and Risk Management
Trusts as required by the respective Boards and in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on May 31, 2024.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $120,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contracts will not exceed $2,474,700. Funds are available in the Finance Department’s
budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
•Auditing and Consulting Services for Regional Wireless Cooperative, Contract
150641, Ordinance S-47892, Aug. 25, 2021
•Auditing and Consulting Services for Regional Wireless Cooperative, Contract
150641, Ordinance S-47336, March 3, 2021
•Auditing and Consulting Services for Regional Wireless Cooperative, Contract
150641, Ordinance S-45691, June 5, 2019
Page 259
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.
Page 260
Report
Amendment (Ordinance S-48836)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 150640 with Heinfeld, Meech, & Co, P.C. to authorize the Finance
Department use of the contract. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$120,000.
Summary
This contract is one of several cooperative contracts previously adopted for use by the
City Auditor Department for auditing and consulting services. This request will add the
Finance Department as an authorized user of the contract to provide the Financial
Accounting and Reporting Division external expertise for auditing financial statements
for Healthcare Benefits Trust, Long Term Disability Trust (LTD), and Risk Management
Trusts as required by the respective Boards and in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on May 31, 2024.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $120,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contracts will not exceed $2,474,700. Funds are available in the Finance Department’s
budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
•Auditing and Consulting Services for Regional Wireless Cooperative, Contract
150641, Ordinance S-47892, Aug. 25, 2021
•Auditing and Consulting Services for Regional Wireless Cooperative, Contract
150641, Ordinance S-47336, March 3, 2021
•Auditing and Consulting Services for Regional Wireless Cooperative, Contract
150641, Ordinance S-45691, June 5, 2019
Page 259
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.
Page 260
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Records Management System Contract - COOP 22-079 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-48841)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
ImageTrend, Inc. to provide a Records Management System (RMS) for the Phoenix
Fire Department (PFD). Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $4.9 million.
Summary
This contract will provide a records management system that will serve as the main
data repository for reporting while providing an integrated system with Computer Aided
Dispatch (CAD) for the PFD. The system will address operational and strategic
objectives to modernize and digitize PFD by replacing multiple systems used for Fire
records management with a single enterprise solution that will provide high availability
to PFD members. System features will include management of Fire incident reports for
operations and investigations, Fire prevention false alarms, personnel exposures and
follow the standards set forth by the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS).
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on a special circumstance with alternative
competition. The Town of Gilbert currently owns a cooperative agreement for a
Records Management System offered by ImageTrend, Inc. which is available for use
by the City and complies with all City procurement requirements for competition. The
contract is compliant with cost, system architecture, interoperability and integration
scalability, functionality and reporting requirements. Due to concerns regarding budget
and timeline constraints, the determination was made to enter into the cooperative
agreement established by the Town of Gilbert and ImageTrend, Inc.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.
Page 261
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value for will not exceed $4.9 million for the five-year
aggregate term.
Funding is available in the Fire Department’s Capital Improvement Program budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 262
Report
(Ordinance S-48841)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
ImageTrend, Inc. to provide a Records Management System (RMS) for the Phoenix
Fire Department (PFD). Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $4.9 million.
Summary
This contract will provide a records management system that will serve as the main
data repository for reporting while providing an integrated system with Computer Aided
Dispatch (CAD) for the PFD. The system will address operational and strategic
objectives to modernize and digitize PFD by replacing multiple systems used for Fire
records management with a single enterprise solution that will provide high availability
to PFD members. System features will include management of Fire incident reports for
operations and investigations, Fire prevention false alarms, personnel exposures and
follow the standards set forth by the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS).
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on a special circumstance with alternative
competition. The Town of Gilbert currently owns a cooperative agreement for a
Records Management System offered by ImageTrend, Inc. which is available for use
by the City and complies with all City procurement requirements for competition. The
contract is compliant with cost, system architecture, interoperability and integration
scalability, functionality and reporting requirements. Due to concerns regarding budget
and timeline constraints, the determination was made to enter into the cooperative
agreement established by the Town of Gilbert and ImageTrend, Inc.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.
Page 261
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value for will not exceed $4.9 million for the five-year
aggregate term.
Funding is available in the Fire Department’s Capital Improvement Program budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 262
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Authorization to Enter into a License for Short-Term Parking at 39 W. Cypress St.
(Ordinance S-48844)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a short-term
license with MBC Properties No. 1 LLC, its successors and/or assigns, for parking at
39 W. Cypress St. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item.
Summary
Additional parking is needed for approximately three weeks for maintenance and repair
work at the City’s Family Advocacy Center parking garage located on Central Avenue.
Half of the garage will be closed during this time to replace the pads and caulking
between the lower and upper levels, and the city-owned overflow parking is too small
to accommodate the parking needs.
The short-term license for 30 non-designated parking spaces will be for a three-week
period and may be extended on a week-to-week basis, as needed, not to exceed six-
months. The license fee is $900, plus applicable taxes, for the three-week term, and
will be prorated at $300 per week for each additional week, if extended. The fee for
this license will be paid from reserves set aside for maintenance and capital
improvements within the property management operating expense account, managed
by Plaza Companies. The license fee is within the range of market rates as determined
by the Real Estate Division.
Contract Term
The term is three weeks and may be extended on a week-to-week basis, as needed,
not to exceed six-months.
Financial Impact
Funding for this license is available in the property management operating expense
account managed by Plaza Companies.
Location
39 W. Cypress St.
Council District: 4
Page 263
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager, Gina
Montes and the Human Services and Finance departments.
Page 264
Report
(Ordinance S-48844)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a short-term
license with MBC Properties No. 1 LLC, its successors and/or assigns, for parking at
39 W. Cypress St. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item.
Summary
Additional parking is needed for approximately three weeks for maintenance and repair
work at the City’s Family Advocacy Center parking garage located on Central Avenue.
Half of the garage will be closed during this time to replace the pads and caulking
between the lower and upper levels, and the city-owned overflow parking is too small
to accommodate the parking needs.
The short-term license for 30 non-designated parking spaces will be for a three-week
period and may be extended on a week-to-week basis, as needed, not to exceed six-
months. The license fee is $900, plus applicable taxes, for the three-week term, and
will be prorated at $300 per week for each additional week, if extended. The fee for
this license will be paid from reserves set aside for maintenance and capital
improvements within the property management operating expense account, managed
by Plaza Companies. The license fee is within the range of market rates as determined
by the Real Estate Division.
Contract Term
The term is three weeks and may be extended on a week-to-week basis, as needed,
not to exceed six-months.
Financial Impact
Funding for this license is available in the property management operating expense
account managed by Plaza Companies.
Location
39 W. Cypress St.
Council District: 4
Page 263
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager, Gina
Montes and the Human Services and Finance departments.
Page 264
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Software Value-Added Reseller Services - State of Arizona Cooperative Contract
- Amendment (Ordinance S-48848)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
contracts 144228 with CDW Government LLC and 151721 with SHI International
Corporation to extend the contract term. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. Further request an exemption to the
indemnification and/or limitation of liability provisions of Phoenix City Code Section 42-
18. The additional expenditures will not exceed $18 million.
Summary
These contracts provide software, volume licenses and enterprise licenses for all City
departments. The largest and most critical software solutions purchased under these
contracts are for email, the internet and intranet, software for servers and other IT
infrastructure, database software and critical security tools for protecting, monitoring,
and responding to threats to the City's network or data. This amendment will allow staff
additional time to complete the solicitation process.
Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through Aug. 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $18 million in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $104,327,330. Funds are available in various departments'
budgets.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Software Value-Added Reseller Services, Contracts 144228 and 141721, Ordinance
S-47903 on Aug. 25, 2021
• Software Value-Added Reseller Services, Contracts 144228 and 141721, Ordinance
S-46331 on Feb. 19, 2020
• Software Value-Added Reseller Services, Contracts 144228 and 141721, Ordinance
S-43077 on Dec. 14, 2016
Page 265
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.
Page 266
Report
- Amendment (Ordinance S-48848)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
contracts 144228 with CDW Government LLC and 151721 with SHI International
Corporation to extend the contract term. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. Further request an exemption to the
indemnification and/or limitation of liability provisions of Phoenix City Code Section 42-
18. The additional expenditures will not exceed $18 million.
Summary
These contracts provide software, volume licenses and enterprise licenses for all City
departments. The largest and most critical software solutions purchased under these
contracts are for email, the internet and intranet, software for servers and other IT
infrastructure, database software and critical security tools for protecting, monitoring,
and responding to threats to the City's network or data. This amendment will allow staff
additional time to complete the solicitation process.
Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through Aug. 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $18 million in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $104,327,330. Funds are available in various departments'
budgets.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Software Value-Added Reseller Services, Contracts 144228 and 141721, Ordinance
S-47903 on Aug. 25, 2021
• Software Value-Added Reseller Services, Contracts 144228 and 141721, Ordinance
S-46331 on Feb. 19, 2020
• Software Value-Added Reseller Services, Contracts 144228 and 141721, Ordinance
S-43077 on Dec. 14, 2016
Page 265
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.
Page 266
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Procurement Consultant for Website Modernization Project Contract - QVL 22-
127- Request for Award (Ordinance S-48852)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Slalom, Inc. to provide procurement consultation services for the procurement of a
solution for the Phoenix.gov Modernization project. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract
will not exceed $183,000. Further request an exception to the limitation of liability
provisions of Phoenix City Code section 42-18.
Summary
The City of Phoenix plans to issue a solicitation to develop and implement a new
public-facing website. Due to the importance of the City's website in providing
residents and businesses with information and services, and the short time frame
desired for the website modernization, consultative information technology
procurement services are requested to assist in the procurement process. The
contractor will collaborate with the City to develop a Request for Proposal (RFP)
document, and will participate in the RFP evaluation process and contract
negotiations.
The requested exception to Phoenix City Code section 42-18 is low risk and necessary
to adopt limitation of liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
The consultant was selected through a competitive process in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10 utilizing the Information Technology
Professional Services Qualified Vendors List.
One vendor submitted a proposal and was deemed responsive and responsible. An
evaluation committee of City staff evaluated the offer based on the following criteria
with a maximum possible point total of 1000:
Page 267
Experience and Qualifications 0-375 points;
Method of Approach 0-350 points; and
Price 0-275 points.
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:
Slalom, Inc., - 781
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, for a one-year term with no options to
extend.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $183,000. Funding is available in the
Information Technology Services Department's budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Inger
Erickson, and the Finance and Information Technology Services departments.
Page 268
Report
127- Request for Award (Ordinance S-48852)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Slalom, Inc. to provide procurement consultation services for the procurement of a
solution for the Phoenix.gov Modernization project. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract
will not exceed $183,000. Further request an exception to the limitation of liability
provisions of Phoenix City Code section 42-18.
Summary
The City of Phoenix plans to issue a solicitation to develop and implement a new
public-facing website. Due to the importance of the City's website in providing
residents and businesses with information and services, and the short time frame
desired for the website modernization, consultative information technology
procurement services are requested to assist in the procurement process. The
contractor will collaborate with the City to develop a Request for Proposal (RFP)
document, and will participate in the RFP evaluation process and contract
negotiations.
The requested exception to Phoenix City Code section 42-18 is low risk and necessary
to adopt limitation of liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
The consultant was selected through a competitive process in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10 utilizing the Information Technology
Professional Services Qualified Vendors List.
One vendor submitted a proposal and was deemed responsive and responsible. An
evaluation committee of City staff evaluated the offer based on the following criteria
with a maximum possible point total of 1000:
Page 267
Experience and Qualifications 0-375 points;
Method of Approach 0-350 points; and
Price 0-275 points.
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:
Slalom, Inc., - 781
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, for a one-year term with no options to
extend.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $183,000. Funding is available in the
Information Technology Services Department's budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Inger
Erickson, and the Finance and Information Technology Services departments.
Page 268
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Reflectorized Sign Sheeting Materials Contract - Coop 22-100 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-48864)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
3M Company to provide reflectorized sign sheeting materials for the Street
Transportation and Aviation Departments. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will
not exceed $1,462,500.
Summary
The contract will provide the needed materials to fabricate and maintain signs for use
within City rights-of-way, as well as the signage at Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport, Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, and Phoenix Goodyear Airport for wayfinding for
passengers and visitors. The signage materials include various width rolls, colors, and
types of sign sheeting materials, films, and inks that are compliant with American
Society of Testing Materials 4956 Type I, Type IV or Type XI.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following: Special Circumstances
Alternative Competition. Adopting the State of Arizona Contract CTR058136 provides
the quality and capacity of signage materials required by the City in a timely manner.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 15, 2022 with a five-year term.
Financial Impact
The contract amount will not exceed $1,462,500.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation and Aviation Departments' Operating
budgets.
Location
4035 W. Glenrosa Ave.
2515 E. Buckeye Rd.
Page 269
Council Districts: 5 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation and Aviation departments.
Page 270
Report
(Ordinance S-48864)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
3M Company to provide reflectorized sign sheeting materials for the Street
Transportation and Aviation Departments. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will
not exceed $1,462,500.
Summary
The contract will provide the needed materials to fabricate and maintain signs for use
within City rights-of-way, as well as the signage at Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport, Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, and Phoenix Goodyear Airport for wayfinding for
passengers and visitors. The signage materials include various width rolls, colors, and
types of sign sheeting materials, films, and inks that are compliant with American
Society of Testing Materials 4956 Type I, Type IV or Type XI.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following: Special Circumstances
Alternative Competition. Adopting the State of Arizona Contract CTR058136 provides
the quality and capacity of signage materials required by the City in a timely manner.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 15, 2022 with a five-year term.
Financial Impact
The contract amount will not exceed $1,462,500.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation and Aviation Departments' Operating
budgets.
Location
4035 W. Glenrosa Ave.
2515 E. Buckeye Rd.
Page 269
Council Districts: 5 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation and Aviation departments.
Page 270
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Network and Telephony Equipment and Services Contract - COOP 23-004
Request for Award (Ordinance S-48869)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Advanced Network Management Inc., dba ANM, Custom Storage Inc., dba cStor, Hye
Tech Network & Security Solutions, LLC, Insight Public Sector, Inc., Global Market
Innovators, Inc., Presidio Networked Solutions LLC, World Wide Technology Inc.,
Enterprise Networks Solutions Inc., and Sentinel Technologies, Inc. to provide network
and telephony equipment and services for Citywide use. Further request an exception
to the indemnity and assumption of liability provisions of Phoenix City Code Section 42
-18. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $40 million.
Summary
This contract will provide a wide variety of network and telephony related equipment
such as routers, servers, switches, and controllers along with maintenance, training,
and services. The equipment is designed and defined by applicable industry
standards, for transporting/receiving data (data, voice, and multimedia) between
connection points, destinations or endpoints.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Special
Circumstances Alternative Competition. The Finance Department, Procurement
Division with the support of the Information Technology Services Department have
researched various local and nationwide cooperative contracts. The State of Arizona
cooperative contracts best align with the City of Phoenix's terms and conditions and
technology network needs.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a 5-year term with no options to
extend.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value for will not exceed $40 million for the 5-year aggregate
term.
Page 271
Funding is available in the various department's budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.
Page 272
Report
Request for Award (Ordinance S-48869)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Advanced Network Management Inc., dba ANM, Custom Storage Inc., dba cStor, Hye
Tech Network & Security Solutions, LLC, Insight Public Sector, Inc., Global Market
Innovators, Inc., Presidio Networked Solutions LLC, World Wide Technology Inc.,
Enterprise Networks Solutions Inc., and Sentinel Technologies, Inc. to provide network
and telephony equipment and services for Citywide use. Further request an exception
to the indemnity and assumption of liability provisions of Phoenix City Code Section 42
-18. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $40 million.
Summary
This contract will provide a wide variety of network and telephony related equipment
such as routers, servers, switches, and controllers along with maintenance, training,
and services. The equipment is designed and defined by applicable industry
standards, for transporting/receiving data (data, voice, and multimedia) between
connection points, destinations or endpoints.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Special
Circumstances Alternative Competition. The Finance Department, Procurement
Division with the support of the Information Technology Services Department have
researched various local and nationwide cooperative contracts. The State of Arizona
cooperative contracts best align with the City of Phoenix's terms and conditions and
technology network needs.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a 5-year term with no options to
extend.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value for will not exceed $40 million for the 5-year aggregate
term.
Page 271
Funding is available in the various department's budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.
Page 272
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Grass Seed Contract - RFQu 22-075 Request for Award (Ordinance S-48875)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter in a contract with
Wilbur-Elis Holdings II, Inc dba Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC to provide rye grass seed
for the Parks and Recreation Department. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of this contract will
not exceed $550,000.
Summary
This contract will provide rye grass seed which is used to over seed sports fields and
high-profile park areas with winter grass. This provides high esthetic value, as well as
increased playability for large, athletic tournaments that provide economic impact to
the City.
Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL).
One Offeror submitted qualifications and was deemed to be responsive and
responsible. An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated this offer based on the
following minimum qualifications:
5 years of experience and expertise.
Capability to provide the estimated quantities needed.
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following Offeror:
Wilbur-Elis Holdings II, Inc dba Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC Company
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 15, 2022, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.
Page 273
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $550,000. Funding is available in the
Parks and Recreation Department's operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Page 274
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter in a contract with
Wilbur-Elis Holdings II, Inc dba Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC to provide rye grass seed
for the Parks and Recreation Department. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of this contract will
not exceed $550,000.
Summary
This contract will provide rye grass seed which is used to over seed sports fields and
high-profile park areas with winter grass. This provides high esthetic value, as well as
increased playability for large, athletic tournaments that provide economic impact to
the City.
Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL).
One Offeror submitted qualifications and was deemed to be responsive and
responsible. An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated this offer based on the
following minimum qualifications:
5 years of experience and expertise.
Capability to provide the estimated quantities needed.
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following Offeror:
Wilbur-Elis Holdings II, Inc dba Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC Company
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 15, 2022, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.
Page 273
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $550,000. Funding is available in the
Parks and Recreation Department's operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Page 274
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Public Safety Radio Network Contract - EXC 22-132 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-48882)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Testforce USA, Inc. to provide a radio interference detection system for the Police
Department. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $132,765.
Summary
The Police Department requires the acquisition, delivery, and installation of a radio
interference detection system for the Regional Wireless Cooperative (RWC) network, a
mission critical public safety radio network, and/or other public safety radio systems.
These receivers are subject to interference either generated maliciously or from other
sources. Interference with the communication signals puts first responders and the
public at risk of not having functional radio communications for police, fire, and
emergency dispatch centers. The radio frequency detection receivers for the system
are to be located and maintained at multiple RWC sites. Additionally, the City requires
maintenance, training, and software support for the system and its components for one
year.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based upon the following reason: Special
Circumstances Without Competition. Testforce is the only company that distributes the
monitoring solution for city and county governments within the State of Arizona.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, as a one-time purchase.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $132,765. Funding is available in the
Police Department's budget.
Page 275
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and Police Department.
Page 276
Report
(Ordinance S-48882)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Testforce USA, Inc. to provide a radio interference detection system for the Police
Department. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $132,765.
Summary
The Police Department requires the acquisition, delivery, and installation of a radio
interference detection system for the Regional Wireless Cooperative (RWC) network, a
mission critical public safety radio network, and/or other public safety radio systems.
These receivers are subject to interference either generated maliciously or from other
sources. Interference with the communication signals puts first responders and the
public at risk of not having functional radio communications for police, fire, and
emergency dispatch centers. The radio frequency detection receivers for the system
are to be located and maintained at multiple RWC sites. Additionally, the City requires
maintenance, training, and software support for the system and its components for one
year.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based upon the following reason: Special
Circumstances Without Competition. Testforce is the only company that distributes the
monitoring solution for city and county governments within the State of Arizona.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, as a one-time purchase.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $132,765. Funding is available in the
Police Department's budget.
Page 275
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and Police Department.
Page 276
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Commercial Driver's License (CDL) Class A Training and Licensing, EXC HR 22-
003 (Ordinance S-48851)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Southwest Truck Driver Training, Inc. to provide training for City employees that
require Commercial Driver's License (CDL) Class A training and licensing for some job
classifications. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $1,200,000.
Summary
This contract will provide additional resources for CDL Class A behind the wheel and
theory training to employees for City departments which require this license as part of
their job functions. The Human Resources Department, Safety Division has an overall
mission to ensure that all City employees receive the required training needed to be
successful in completing their daily work duties and reduce workplace injuries. The
Safety Division has been providing CDL Training and Licensing services in-house. In
February 2022, the US Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA) made a federal regulatory change to Entry-Level Driver
Training (ELDT) requirements for CDL applicants. ELDT is now a federally
standardized program that is required prior to taking the skills and knowledge test for a
Commercial Driver’s License (CDL). The new required program is significantly longer
than the previous program provided by the Human Resources Safety Division and
additional resources are needed through this contract to ensure timely delivery of the
training to new employees that require a CDL. Departments that use this service
include Water Services, Street Transportation, Public Works, Parks & Recreation and
Aviation.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, normal competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination citing Southwest Truck Driver Training as a Special
Circumstances - Without Competition. Southwest Truck Driver Training, Inc. is
registered as a training provider on the FMCSA's Training Provider Registry and has
been conducting CDL training in Arizona for over 20 years.
Page 277
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022 for a five year period.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1,200,000. Funds are available in the
various departments' operating budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.
Page 278
Report
003 (Ordinance S-48851)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Southwest Truck Driver Training, Inc. to provide training for City employees that
require Commercial Driver's License (CDL) Class A training and licensing for some job
classifications. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $1,200,000.
Summary
This contract will provide additional resources for CDL Class A behind the wheel and
theory training to employees for City departments which require this license as part of
their job functions. The Human Resources Department, Safety Division has an overall
mission to ensure that all City employees receive the required training needed to be
successful in completing their daily work duties and reduce workplace injuries. The
Safety Division has been providing CDL Training and Licensing services in-house. In
February 2022, the US Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA) made a federal regulatory change to Entry-Level Driver
Training (ELDT) requirements for CDL applicants. ELDT is now a federally
standardized program that is required prior to taking the skills and knowledge test for a
Commercial Driver’s License (CDL). The new required program is significantly longer
than the previous program provided by the Human Resources Safety Division and
additional resources are needed through this contract to ensure timely delivery of the
training to new employees that require a CDL. Departments that use this service
include Water Services, Street Transportation, Public Works, Parks & Recreation and
Aviation.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, normal competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination citing Southwest Truck Driver Training as a Special
Circumstances - Without Competition. Southwest Truck Driver Training, Inc. is
registered as a training provider on the FMCSA's Training Provider Registry and has
been conducting CDL training in Arizona for over 20 years.
Page 277
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022 for a five year period.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1,200,000. Funds are available in the
various departments' operating budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.
Page 278
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Employee Medical Health Plans, Contract Extensions (Ordinance S-48862)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
contract 151578 with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona Inc. ("BCBSAZ") and contract
151607 and amendment no. 1 thereto with Banner Health and Aetna Health Insurance
Company ("Banner/Aetna") and its assignee, Banner Employer Services, LLC
("Banner Employer") the operator of the near site clinic to extend the terms of those
agreements for an additional year, effective Jan. 1, 2024 through Dec. 31, 2024.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $8,500,000.
Summary
These contracts need a one-year extension to allow the Human Resources
Department to work with a consultant to develop the scope of work and evaluation
criteria, conduct a formal solicitation for the medical health plans, complete transition
of health plans including all programming in eCHRIS, and prepare employee
communications and open enrollment. Approval of the contract extensions will result in
uninterrupted health benefits to city employees and their dependents.
Procurement Information
The contracts were originally procured through a competitive Request for Proposal
(RFP) process in 2018, in accordance with City policy.
Contract Term
Upon approval the contracts will be extended through Dec. 31, 2024.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $8,500,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $41,000,000. Employee contributions account for
approximately 20 percent of these funds. The costs for these services are paid by the
Health Care Benefits Trust Fund.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The initial contracts were approved by City Council on Aug. 29, 2018 (Ordinance S-
44951).
Page 279
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.
Page 280
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
contract 151578 with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona Inc. ("BCBSAZ") and contract
151607 and amendment no. 1 thereto with Banner Health and Aetna Health Insurance
Company ("Banner/Aetna") and its assignee, Banner Employer Services, LLC
("Banner Employer") the operator of the near site clinic to extend the terms of those
agreements for an additional year, effective Jan. 1, 2024 through Dec. 31, 2024.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $8,500,000.
Summary
These contracts need a one-year extension to allow the Human Resources
Department to work with a consultant to develop the scope of work and evaluation
criteria, conduct a formal solicitation for the medical health plans, complete transition
of health plans including all programming in eCHRIS, and prepare employee
communications and open enrollment. Approval of the contract extensions will result in
uninterrupted health benefits to city employees and their dependents.
Procurement Information
The contracts were originally procured through a competitive Request for Proposal
(RFP) process in 2018, in accordance with City policy.
Contract Term
Upon approval the contracts will be extended through Dec. 31, 2024.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $8,500,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $41,000,000. Employee contributions account for
approximately 20 percent of these funds. The costs for these services are paid by the
Health Care Benefits Trust Fund.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The initial contracts were approved by City Council on Aug. 29, 2018 (Ordinance S-
44951).
Page 279
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.
Page 280
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Employee Back-up Care, Tutoring and Discounted Services, EXC HR 22-004
(Ordinance S-48886)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Care.com, Inc. to provide eligible City employees with back-up care, tutoring and
discounted services. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $1,000,000.
Summary
This contract is needed to provide a broad range of services and additional resources
to full-time City employees and their family members. This includes extending benefits
to adults and children for which the employee provides primary care. The use of these
services will provide employees flexibility and additional resources for unplanned and
emergency events when regular routine services fall through during work hours or
work related travel. The contract will also provide discounted services by providing a
membership for Care.com for each City employee.
Back-up care services include child care (in-home and out-of-home), senior
caregivers, caregivers for special needs children and adults, tutors and distance
learning facilitators, etc. Discounted services include City employee discounts to child
care, senior care services, fitness and wellness, etc.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, normal competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo citing the unique service provided by Care.com, Inc.
Care.com, Inc. has been providing employee back-up care services since 2006.
Services are offered throughout the United States and locally to both private and public
agencies.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022 for a five year period.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract will not exceed $1,000,000. Funds are available in the Human
Resources Department's operating budget.
Page 281
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.
Page 282
Report
(Ordinance S-48886)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Care.com, Inc. to provide eligible City employees with back-up care, tutoring and
discounted services. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $1,000,000.
Summary
This contract is needed to provide a broad range of services and additional resources
to full-time City employees and their family members. This includes extending benefits
to adults and children for which the employee provides primary care. The use of these
services will provide employees flexibility and additional resources for unplanned and
emergency events when regular routine services fall through during work hours or
work related travel. The contract will also provide discounted services by providing a
membership for Care.com for each City employee.
Back-up care services include child care (in-home and out-of-home), senior
caregivers, caregivers for special needs children and adults, tutors and distance
learning facilitators, etc. Discounted services include City employee discounts to child
care, senior care services, fitness and wellness, etc.
Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, normal competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo citing the unique service provided by Care.com, Inc.
Care.com, Inc. has been providing employee back-up care services since 2006.
Services are offered throughout the United States and locally to both private and public
agencies.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022 for a five year period.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract will not exceed $1,000,000. Funds are available in the Human
Resources Department's operating budget.
Page 281
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.
Page 282
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend Personnel Rule 15, Parental Leave (Ordinance S-48888)
Request City Council approval of amendments to City of Phoenix Personnel Rule 15 (
Attachment A). This action establishes final rules and adopts changes to update the
City’s Personnel Rules.
Summary
The proposed amendments to Personnel Rule 15 reflect an additional leave benefit for
Personnel Rules 15c2(D) and 15j include this new paid leave benefit type, which
provides eligible employees up to 480 hours of City-paid leave for the birth, adoption,
or foster care placement of a child during a 12-month period. This new leave benefit
will be available to eligible employees on Oct. 1, 2022.
This change is intended to allow the City to (1) maintain its competitive edge to recruit
and retain a highly skilled and productive workforce and (2) provide working parents
and caregivers greater flexibility in balancing their work and family commitments.
Public Outreach
A public meeting was conducted by the Human Resources Department on June 8,
2022, to formally solicit comments on the proposed amendments.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.
Page 283
Attachment A
PURPOSE – The proposed amendments to Personnel Rule 15 reflect an additional leave benefit
for City of Phoenix employees. The proposed amendments to Personnel Rule 15c2(D) and the
addition of 15j include the new paid leave benefit type, Parental Leave, providing eligible
employees up to 480 hours of paid City leave for the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of
a child during a 12-month period.
New language to be included in the Personnel Rules is identified in all capital letters. Deletions
are indicated by strikethrough. For convenience all amendments, including formatting changes,
are highlighted in yellow.
Proposed language accomplishes the following:
Establishes Parental Leave
Page 284
Personnel Rule 15c2(D) is modified to read:
15c2. Qualifications for Sick Leave
Sick leave shall only be allowed when:
* * *
D. Parental Leave. The employee qualifies for leave for the birth,
adoption or placement of a child under the Family and Medical Leave
Act (FMLA). The employee may use vacation or sick leave for any
qualified FMLA absence IF THE EMPLOYEE’S PAID PARENTAL
LEAVE BENEFIT IS EXHAUSTED. REFER TO THE PAID PARENTAL
LEAVE PROVISIONS UNDER RULE 15J (EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1,
2022).
Personnel Rule 15 is amended by adding the following:
15j. PAID PARENTAL LEAVE
15j1. ELIGIBILITY AND ENTITLEMENT:
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2022, AN EMPLOYEE MAY BE
ALLOWED UP TO 480 HOURS OF CITY-PAID LEAVE UPON
THE BIRTH, ADOPTION, OR FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT OF
A CHILD. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR PAID PARENTAL LEAVE, AN
EMPLOYEE MUST MEET THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE
ACT (FMLA) ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. AN EMPLOYEE
MUST HAVE BEEN EMPLOYED BY THE CITY FOR AT LEAST
12 MONTHS AND HAVE PERFORMED AT LEAST 1,250 HOURS
OF WORK DURING THE 12-MONTH PERIOD IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE LEAVE. PAID
PARENTAL LEAVE WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY WITH AN
EMPLOYEE’S FMLA ENTITLEMENT. EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE
EXHAUSTED THEIR FMLA ENTITLEMENT FOR REASONS
OTHER THAN THE BIRTH, ADOPTION, OR FOSTER CARE
PLACEMENT OF A CHILD MAY BE ALLOWED UP TO 480
HOURS OF PAID PARENTAL LEAVE. PAID PARENTAL LEAVE
DOES NOT EXTEND FMLA LEAVE PROTECTIONS AND
ENTITLEMENT HOURS. WHEN BOTH PARENTS ARE CITY
EMPLOYEES, EACH EMPLOYEE MAY BE ALLOWED UP TO
480 HOURS OF PAID PARENTAL LEAVE. A MAXIMUM OF 480
HOURS OF PAID PARENTAL LEAVE IS AVAILABLE ONLY
ONCE DURING A CONSECUTIVE 12-MONTH PERIOD. THE 12-
MONTH PERIOD BEGINS UPON THE DATE OF THE BIRTH,
ADOPTION, OR FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT OF A CHILD.
Page 285
15j2- USAGE:
ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES MAY USE UP TO 480 HOURS OF PAID
PARENTAL LEAVE DURING THE 12-MONTH PERIOD BEGINNING
ON THE DATE OF THE BIRTH, ADOPTION, OR FOSTER CARE
PLACEMENT OF A CHILD. PAID PARENTAL LEAVE MUST BE
SCHEDULED IN ADVANCE AND BE TAKEN CONTINUOUSLY OR IN
INCREMENTS OF AT LEAST ONE FULL DAY AT A TIME. PAID
PARENTAL LEAVE WILL BE SUBSTITUTED FOR OTHER LEAVE
TYPES FOR UP TO 480 HOURS DURING THE 12-MONTH PERIOD
BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF THE BIRTH, ADOPTION, OR
FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT OF A CHILD.
Page 286
Report
Request City Council approval of amendments to City of Phoenix Personnel Rule 15 (
Attachment A). This action establishes final rules and adopts changes to update the
City’s Personnel Rules.
Summary
The proposed amendments to Personnel Rule 15 reflect an additional leave benefit for
Personnel Rules 15c2(D) and 15j include this new paid leave benefit type, which
provides eligible employees up to 480 hours of City-paid leave for the birth, adoption,
or foster care placement of a child during a 12-month period. This new leave benefit
will be available to eligible employees on Oct. 1, 2022.
This change is intended to allow the City to (1) maintain its competitive edge to recruit
and retain a highly skilled and productive workforce and (2) provide working parents
and caregivers greater flexibility in balancing their work and family commitments.
Public Outreach
A public meeting was conducted by the Human Resources Department on June 8,
2022, to formally solicit comments on the proposed amendments.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.
Page 283
Attachment A
PURPOSE – The proposed amendments to Personnel Rule 15 reflect an additional leave benefit
for City of Phoenix employees. The proposed amendments to Personnel Rule 15c2(D) and the
addition of 15j include the new paid leave benefit type, Parental Leave, providing eligible
employees up to 480 hours of paid City leave for the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of
a child during a 12-month period.
New language to be included in the Personnel Rules is identified in all capital letters. Deletions
are indicated by strikethrough. For convenience all amendments, including formatting changes,
are highlighted in yellow.
Proposed language accomplishes the following:
Establishes Parental Leave
Page 284
Personnel Rule 15c2(D) is modified to read:
15c2. Qualifications for Sick Leave
Sick leave shall only be allowed when:
* * *
D. Parental Leave. The employee qualifies for leave for the birth,
adoption or placement of a child under the Family and Medical Leave
Act (FMLA). The employee may use vacation or sick leave for any
qualified FMLA absence IF THE EMPLOYEE’S PAID PARENTAL
LEAVE BENEFIT IS EXHAUSTED. REFER TO THE PAID PARENTAL
LEAVE PROVISIONS UNDER RULE 15J (EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1,
2022).
Personnel Rule 15 is amended by adding the following:
15j. PAID PARENTAL LEAVE
15j1. ELIGIBILITY AND ENTITLEMENT:
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2022, AN EMPLOYEE MAY BE
ALLOWED UP TO 480 HOURS OF CITY-PAID LEAVE UPON
THE BIRTH, ADOPTION, OR FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT OF
A CHILD. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR PAID PARENTAL LEAVE, AN
EMPLOYEE MUST MEET THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE
ACT (FMLA) ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. AN EMPLOYEE
MUST HAVE BEEN EMPLOYED BY THE CITY FOR AT LEAST
12 MONTHS AND HAVE PERFORMED AT LEAST 1,250 HOURS
OF WORK DURING THE 12-MONTH PERIOD IMMEDIATELY
PRECEDING THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE LEAVE. PAID
PARENTAL LEAVE WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY WITH AN
EMPLOYEE’S FMLA ENTITLEMENT. EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE
EXHAUSTED THEIR FMLA ENTITLEMENT FOR REASONS
OTHER THAN THE BIRTH, ADOPTION, OR FOSTER CARE
PLACEMENT OF A CHILD MAY BE ALLOWED UP TO 480
HOURS OF PAID PARENTAL LEAVE. PAID PARENTAL LEAVE
DOES NOT EXTEND FMLA LEAVE PROTECTIONS AND
ENTITLEMENT HOURS. WHEN BOTH PARENTS ARE CITY
EMPLOYEES, EACH EMPLOYEE MAY BE ALLOWED UP TO
480 HOURS OF PAID PARENTAL LEAVE. A MAXIMUM OF 480
HOURS OF PAID PARENTAL LEAVE IS AVAILABLE ONLY
ONCE DURING A CONSECUTIVE 12-MONTH PERIOD. THE 12-
MONTH PERIOD BEGINS UPON THE DATE OF THE BIRTH,
ADOPTION, OR FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT OF A CHILD.
Page 285
15j2- USAGE:
ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES MAY USE UP TO 480 HOURS OF PAID
PARENTAL LEAVE DURING THE 12-MONTH PERIOD BEGINNING
ON THE DATE OF THE BIRTH, ADOPTION, OR FOSTER CARE
PLACEMENT OF A CHILD. PAID PARENTAL LEAVE MUST BE
SCHEDULED IN ADVANCE AND BE TAKEN CONTINUOUSLY OR IN
INCREMENTS OF AT LEAST ONE FULL DAY AT A TIME. PAID
PARENTAL LEAVE WILL BE SUBSTITUTED FOR OTHER LEAVE
TYPES FOR UP TO 480 HOURS DURING THE 12-MONTH PERIOD
BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF THE BIRTH, ADOPTION, OR
FOSTER CARE PLACEMENT OF A CHILD.
Page 286
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Public Communications Equipment and Parts - Requirements Contract
(Ordinance S-48828)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Tessco Incorporated, and OGMIS Group, Inc. to purchase public communication
equipment and parts for the Information Technology Services Department and in
support of other City departments. The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1
million. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item.
Summary
Public communications equipment and parts are needed to support the City’s radio
communications for Police, Fire, and other various departments who use public
communication equipment. These contracts would also provide the necessary
equipment to maintain the Regional Wireless Cooperative Public Safety Radio System.
Failure to maintain equipment and parts for portable and mobile radios would create a
loss of productivity and liability in not meeting public safety requirements. These
agreements will also support replacement of leased telecommunication lines that will
either be discontinued by the vendor or would be charged at a higher cost to the City
for operations and maintenance.
Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid, ITS IFB 22-004, was conducted in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.
The bid notification was sent to 426 suppliers and was publicly posted and available
for download from the City's website. Six offers were received by the Procurement
Officer on May 25, 2022, and were evaluated on discount percentages,
responsiveness to specifications, and responsibility to provide the requested goods
and/or services. Multiple awards are recommended to ensure the overall lowest cost to
City.
The Chief Information Officer recommends that the offers from Tessco Incorporated,
and OGMIS Group, Incorporated be accepted as the lowest priced, responsive and
responsible offers. Multiple awards are recommended to ensure the overall lowest cost
Page 287
to the City.
Contract Term
The five-year contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1 million and funds are available in the
Information Technology Services Department's budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Information
Technology Services Department.
Page 288
Report
(Ordinance S-48828)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Tessco Incorporated, and OGMIS Group, Inc. to purchase public communication
equipment and parts for the Information Technology Services Department and in
support of other City departments. The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1
million. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item.
Summary
Public communications equipment and parts are needed to support the City’s radio
communications for Police, Fire, and other various departments who use public
communication equipment. These contracts would also provide the necessary
equipment to maintain the Regional Wireless Cooperative Public Safety Radio System.
Failure to maintain equipment and parts for portable and mobile radios would create a
loss of productivity and liability in not meeting public safety requirements. These
agreements will also support replacement of leased telecommunication lines that will
either be discontinued by the vendor or would be charged at a higher cost to the City
for operations and maintenance.
Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid, ITS IFB 22-004, was conducted in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.
The bid notification was sent to 426 suppliers and was publicly posted and available
for download from the City's website. Six offers were received by the Procurement
Officer on May 25, 2022, and were evaluated on discount percentages,
responsiveness to specifications, and responsibility to provide the requested goods
and/or services. Multiple awards are recommended to ensure the overall lowest cost to
City.
The Chief Information Officer recommends that the offers from Tessco Incorporated,
and OGMIS Group, Incorporated be accepted as the lowest priced, responsive and
responsible offers. Multiple awards are recommended to ensure the overall lowest cost
Page 287
to the City.
Contract Term
The five-year contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1 million and funds are available in the
Information Technology Services Department's budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Information
Technology Services Department.
Page 288
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Professional Services for Network Support - Amendments (Ordinance S-48877)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend the term of the
contracts with Integrity Network Solutions, LLC 145945; Intraedge, Inc. 145943;
Kollasoft, Inc. 145944; and Scott Business Group, LLC 145942, to continue to provide
professional information technology (IT) network support services on an as-needed
basis, for the Information Technology Services Department (ITS). No additional funds
are being requested; any remaining funds authorized by previous City Council action
will be applied to the extended contract term. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
These agreements form part of the Professional Services for Network Support
Services Qualified Vendor List (QVL). The contractors provide ad-hoc professional
services related to networking (e.g. Network Technicians, Network Engineers, and
Senior Network Engineers) and provides flexibility in allowing the City to select
technicians with skill sets and experience specific to the IT project being undertaken.
The number and complexity of citywide IT projects can vary over time and the City will
utilize contract technicians to ensure expenses only occur as needed and provide the
specific and unique expertise to ensure projects are successful.
Contract Term
The term of these agreements will be extended through June 30, 2023. This request
will allow the City additional time to solicit and establish new contracts for these
services and to obtain City Council authorization.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this request. The contracts'
aggregate value remains at $5 million.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Information
Technology Services Department.
Page 289
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend the term of the
contracts with Integrity Network Solutions, LLC 145945; Intraedge, Inc. 145943;
Kollasoft, Inc. 145944; and Scott Business Group, LLC 145942, to continue to provide
professional information technology (IT) network support services on an as-needed
basis, for the Information Technology Services Department (ITS). No additional funds
are being requested; any remaining funds authorized by previous City Council action
will be applied to the extended contract term. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
These agreements form part of the Professional Services for Network Support
Services Qualified Vendor List (QVL). The contractors provide ad-hoc professional
services related to networking (e.g. Network Technicians, Network Engineers, and
Senior Network Engineers) and provides flexibility in allowing the City to select
technicians with skill sets and experience specific to the IT project being undertaken.
The number and complexity of citywide IT projects can vary over time and the City will
utilize contract technicians to ensure expenses only occur as needed and provide the
specific and unique expertise to ensure projects are successful.
Contract Term
The term of these agreements will be extended through June 30, 2023. This request
will allow the City additional time to solicit and establish new contracts for these
services and to obtain City Council authorization.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City as a result of this request. The contracts'
aggregate value remains at $5 million.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Information
Technology Services Department.
Page 289
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (Ordinance
S-48887)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO)
for investigations that would be conducted by the Phoenix Police Department (PPD),
but where there is a conflict with the PPD conducting the investigation. The amount of
the agreement is not to exceed $250,000. Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item.
Summary
MCSO agreed to act as an investigative body on the City's behalf in a case where
PPD has a conflict. MCSO now finds that due to shortages in staffing they need to hire
an outside investigator to assist with the investigation. The City agrees to pay the
invoices for the outside investigator hired by MCSO, after MCSO reviews and
approves the charges for the investigation. MCSO will hire and supervise the
investigator to maintain the separation from Phoenix, as required for the assignment of
the conflict.
Contract Term
The agreement term is one year, July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Funds are available in the Law Department budget for legal services.
Location
The location is Citywide.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 290
Report
S-48887)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO)
for investigations that would be conducted by the Phoenix Police Department (PPD),
but where there is a conflict with the PPD conducting the investigation. The amount of
the agreement is not to exceed $250,000. Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item.
Summary
MCSO agreed to act as an investigative body on the City's behalf in a case where
PPD has a conflict. MCSO now finds that due to shortages in staffing they need to hire
an outside investigator to assist with the investigation. The City agrees to pay the
invoices for the outside investigator hired by MCSO, after MCSO reviews and
approves the charges for the investigation. MCSO will hire and supervise the
investigator to maintain the separation from Phoenix, as required for the assignment of
the conflict.
Contract Term
The agreement term is one year, July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Funds are available in the Law Department budget for legal services.
Location
The location is Citywide.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 290
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Authorization to Enter into Contracts for Document Review Legal Services
(Ordinance S-48892)
Request to authorize the City Manager, through the City Attorney, or his designee, to
enter into contracts with Business Intelligence Associates, Inc. dba BIA and QuisLex,
Inc. to provide document review legal services for the Law Department on an as-
needed basis as determined by the City Attorney. Further request an exemption to the
indemnification and/or limitation of liability provisions of Phoenix City Code section 42-
18. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $350,000 over the three-year
contract term.
Summary
These contracts will provide document review legal services to assist the Law
Department with high-volume document review projects, especially related to the
Department of Justice investigation, that involve analysis and sorting of legally
privileged and/or confidential information. These services are critical to allow the Law
Department to timely and efficiently comply with document requests while ensuring
that privileged, confidential, and otherwise protected information is properly identified
and secured.
Procurement Information
The City Code authorizes the City Attorney to enter into agreements to provide legal
services for the City of Phoenix. Legal services, including the services sought here, are
exempted from the competitive procurement requirements of the City Code. However,
the Law Department still sought quotes from multiple prospective contractors and
selected Business Intelligence Associates, Inc. and QuisLex, Inc. as the only
responsive contractors.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a three-year term with no options
to extend.
Financial Impact
Funds are available in various department budgets, including Law Department and the
Self-Insurance Fund. The individual contracts and related project-specific
Page 291
Self-Insurance Fund. The individual contracts and related project-specific
engagements will set forth the specific fees for each service. Payments will be made
from affected funding sources, primarily the Self-Insurance Fund, or the general fund
on an individual project or assignment basis. Total expenditures over the life of the
contracts will not exceed $350,000.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 292
Report
(Ordinance S-48892)
Request to authorize the City Manager, through the City Attorney, or his designee, to
enter into contracts with Business Intelligence Associates, Inc. dba BIA and QuisLex,
Inc. to provide document review legal services for the Law Department on an as-
needed basis as determined by the City Attorney. Further request an exemption to the
indemnification and/or limitation of liability provisions of Phoenix City Code section 42-
18. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $350,000 over the three-year
contract term.
Summary
These contracts will provide document review legal services to assist the Law
Department with high-volume document review projects, especially related to the
Department of Justice investigation, that involve analysis and sorting of legally
privileged and/or confidential information. These services are critical to allow the Law
Department to timely and efficiently comply with document requests while ensuring
that privileged, confidential, and otherwise protected information is properly identified
and secured.
Procurement Information
The City Code authorizes the City Attorney to enter into agreements to provide legal
services for the City of Phoenix. Legal services, including the services sought here, are
exempted from the competitive procurement requirements of the City Code. However,
the Law Department still sought quotes from multiple prospective contractors and
selected Business Intelligence Associates, Inc. and QuisLex, Inc. as the only
responsive contractors.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a three-year term with no options
to extend.
Financial Impact
Funds are available in various department budgets, including Law Department and the
Self-Insurance Fund. The individual contracts and related project-specific
Page 291
Self-Insurance Fund. The individual contracts and related project-specific
engagements will set forth the specific fees for each service. Payments will be made
from affected funding sources, primarily the Self-Insurance Fund, or the general fund
on an individual project or assignment basis. Total expenditures over the life of the
contracts will not exceed $350,000.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 292
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Gila River Indian Community Gaming Grants (Ordinance S-48829)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply, accept, and, if
awarded, enter into related agreements for up to $4,880,618.34 in new funding from
the Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) under the 2022 funding cycle. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse funds
as directed by GRIC in connection with these grants.
Summary
If awarded, these monies would be applied, as directed by GRIC, towards the
following:
City Applications
· Community and Economic Development: $152,577 (over three years) for the Mobile
Career Unit, which will fund software and licenses for the public's use while on
board the Mobile Career Unit.
· Office of Sustainability: $200,000 (over two years) for the Electric Vehicle Outreach
and Education Program, which will provide public education to improve attitudes
about and increase usage of electric vehicles.
· Phoenix Fire Department: $76,189.42 for the Special Events Emergency Response
Apparatus, which will enhance emergency medical response capabilities within the
footprint of special events with limited vehicle access due to crowd congestion or
space restriction.
Non-Profit Applications
· A Stepping Stone Foundation: $100,000 (over two years) for the Literacy Elevates
Arizona Families (LEAF) program, which will help fund two-generation education
(preschool, parent and adult education) with home visiting.
· Amanda Hope Rainbow Angels: $25,000 for the Moms Mentoring Program, which
will provide mentoring for moms whose children are battling cancer and other life-
threatening diseases.
· Arizona Educational Foundation: $25,000 for the Our World: Educators for
Indigenous Students program, which will provide free training for Phoenix-area
schools in how to better serve Indigenous students and their families.
Page 293
· Arizona Humane Society: $100,000 for the Saving Animals from Large-Scale
Hoarding Cases program, which will provide medical treatment to animals removed
from hazardous and unsafe large-scale hoarding cases and maintain a fleet of
animal ambulances used to transport the animals to the Second Chance Animal
Trauma Hospital. Funding will help Emergency Animal Medical Technicians
continue to support Phoenix Law Enforcement and provide lifesaving medical care
to animals rescued from inhumane conditions.
· Arizona Pet Project: $45,000 for the Bonded Family Project, which will remove
barriers to care and create pet-health equity among families in need.
· Arizona Science Center: $50,000 for STEM Learning Programs for Low-Income
Children, which will provide free focused field trips and Science on Wheels STEM
learning programs for 3,700 low-income children from Title 1 schools in the 2022-
2023 school year.
· Arizona Sustainability Alliance: $206,148 (over three years) for the Sow It Forward:
Vertical Garden Program, which will support the continued growth of the Sow It
Forward program and help expand into new school districts across the state.
· Assistance League of Phoenix: $50,000 for the Operation School Bell Wardrobes
for Children in Poverty program, which will help expand to meet a growing need.
Operation School Bell provides new school wardrobes, including a hygiene kit and
new book, to very low-income grade K-8 children attending Phoenix Metro Area
high-poverty, Title 1 schools.
· Aunt Rita's Foundation: $15,000 (over two years) for the HIVAZ Connect program,
which will support HIVAZ Connect, Aunt Rita's statewide information and referral
program, which provides HIV negative and positive individuals with information to
prevent HIV transmission, and connects people living with HIV to treatment,
assistance with housing, medications, etc.
· Ballet Arizona: $30,000 (over three years) for the Ballet Arizona's DanceAZ School
Residency Program, which will support the DanceAZ School Residency Program,
helping them partner with five Title 1 elementary schools in Maricopa County to
provide under-served youth with a consistent, high-quality arts education.
· Banner Health Foundation: $400,000 (over two years) for the Substance Use
Telehealth for Arizona Rural Communities program, which will expand Banner
Health's evidence-based, multidisciplinary substance use disorder treatment model
to rural communities through a combination of in-person and telegraph integrated
care.
· Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Arizona: $50,000 for the West Phoenix Site-
Based and Community-Based Mentoring program, which will provide mentoring to
at-risk youth in West Phoenix.
· Central Arizona Shelter Services: $225,000 (over three years) for the Project Haven
for Seniors Experiencing Homelessness program, which will support homeless
Page 294
shelter and wrap-around services for seniors in Phoenix, Arizona.
· Children's Museum of Phoenix: $270,000 (over three years) for the Children's
Museum of Phoenix's Free First Friday Nights program, which will open the
museum to the public for ten free nights and serving over 25,000 people per year
and to establish the IDEA Fellows Program by providing two paid fellowships for
individuals facing barriers and promoting diverse perspectives in their field.
· Chrysalis Veterans Services, Inc.: $300,000 (over three years) for the Improving
Economic Security by Strengthening the Veteran's Job Readiness program, which
provides funding to assist veterans to ensure their economic security, and can
consistently meet their essential needs in a sustainable manner and with dignity.
The program provides funding to assist with the material needs of the veteran so
they can be job ready.
· Civitan Foundation, Inc.: $75,884 for the Civitan MIDTOWN - Economic Mobility
and Transportation program, which will provide economic development
opportunities for special needs Arizonans through the new Civitan MIDTOWN
property on Thomas Road and 16th Street, which will provide job skills training,
social enterprise employment, economic stimulus through goods sold, and provide
no-cost transportation for special needs Arizonans to attend job opportunities and
regular employment.
· Creighton Community Foundation: $74,110.92 for the Native Foods and Flora
Activity Center on the Phoenix Grand Canalscape program, which will assist in the
creation of the Native Foods and Flora Activity Center for food and environmental
education.
· Duet: Partners in Health and Aging: $30,000 for the Improving the Health and
Wellness of Vulnerable Seniors program, which will help Duet provide a variety of
services (grocery shopping assistance, transport to medical appointments, etc.)
through its caring volunteers that meet the basic and other needs of homebound
seniors so they can remain in their homes and out of assistive living for as long as
possible.
· Educare Arizona: $50,000 for the Child Development Associate Certificate: A Two-
Generation Anti-Poverty Program, which will enable low-income individuals,
primarily mothers, to begin new careers while improving early childhood education
for thousands of young children in Arizona.
· Elevate Phoenix: $30,000 for the Improving At-Risk Youths' Academic Success and
Futures program, which will improve the academic success, life skills, literacy skills,
well-being, and future outcomes of low-income, at-risk urban youth.
· Foundation for Senior Living (FSL): $15,000 for the FSL Nutrition Program for
Under-Resourced Aging Adults program, which will support FSL's efforts to reduce
food insecurity among under-resourced aging adults, 60+ years of age and older.
· Fresh Start Women's Foundation: $50,000 for The Impact Program: Helping
Page 295
Women Achieve Self-Sufficiency program, which will empower women to achieve
self-sufficiency through an evidence-informed, holistic approach that focuses on job
-readiness, career training (including entrepreneurship, for those interested), and
employment in well-paying careers.
· Furnishing Dignity: $100,000 for the Essential Home Furnishings Program
Expansion, which will provide whole home furnishings to low-income children,
adults and families as they successfully exit shelter and transition to permanent
housing. Funding will consolidate storage units into one large warehouse space
with loading dock, and purchase a second gently used moving truck and program
supplies to support significant increases in donated home furnishings and demand
for services.
· Girl Scouts-Arizona Cactus-Pine Council: $15,000 for the Girl Scout Program, which
will support Girl Scout programming that promotes academic achievement, mental
wellness, and overall positive life outcomes for girls in Maricopa County.
· Greater Phoenix Chamber Foundation: $60,000 (over two years) for the
ElevateEdAZ program, which will support the strategic education and workforce
initiative ElevateEdAZ, which drives cross-sector innovation to identify and solve
Arizona's education to employment pathway issues. Funding will help deliver high-
quality work-based learning opportunities to students in the Greater Phoenix region
and beyond, preparing them to enter high-wage, high-skill, and high-demand
careers and graduate with industry-recognized credentials and early postsecondary
credit, and garner meaningful work-based learning experiences with business
professionals to strengthen and diversify the Greater Phoenix region's workforce.
· Hacienda, Inc.: $50,000 for the Hacienda Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Enhancements program, which will rehabilitate a new group home purchase into an
ADA compliant group home and convert other group home bathtub bathrooms into
floor level showers for its clients/residents who are wheelchair mobile.
· Hacienda, Inc.: $30,000 for the Hacienda Roof Repairs and Renovations project,
which will repair areas of the roof where leaks have been identified. Each year the
leaks get worse and new leaks appear. The roof affects client areas where some
programs are held.
· Hacienda, Inc.: $21,000 for the Hacienda Wheelchair Accessible Minivans project,
which funding will support the matching requirement of the Federal Transportation
Administration 5310 program to purchase two minivans for their group homes.
· Heard Museum: $25,000 for the Native Veterans Exhibition - "Unconquered: A
Legacy of Service", which will fund the creation and implementation of a special
exhibition dedicated to American Indian veterans in commemoration of the 10th
Anniversary of the Heard Museum's American Indian Veterans Memorial.
· Homeward Bound: $50,000 for the Empowering Today, Building Tomorrow project,
which will support families facing or experiencing homelessness in GED completion
Page 296
and gaining employment/job skills, so they can increase their economic security and
stability to break the cycle of poverty and homelessness.
· Hope Community Services: $30,000 for the Trauma Therapy for Low-Income
Children and Youth program, which will support Hope Community Services' (HCS)
specialized trauma therapy program for low-income children who have experienced
extreme, ongoing trauma. HCS' individualized therapies wrap children, and when
appropriate, their caregivers, in supportive services to increase their chances of
healing, getting back on a normal development path, and preventing long-term
trauma-related problems.
· Hushabye Nursery: $15,000 for the Hope for the Tiniest Victims of the opioid crisis
program, which will improve health outcomes from the Arizona opioid crisis.
· Life More Abundantly Pregnancy/Family Resource Center: $50,000 for the
Decreasing Pregnancy Complications and STD risks in South Phoenix program,
which will support the healthcare staffing, supplies, and occupancy costs.
· Live and Learn Program: $20,000 for the Economic Empowerment for Women
Program, which offers women living in poverty a path to stability and employment.
· Los Ninos Hospital, Inc. dba Innovative Home Health Nursing Services: $34,131 for
the Home Health Technology Services program, which will improve the quality of
patient care for home health services by using technology systems that increase
efficiency in medical records management, speed, and accuracy.
· Maggie's Place, Inc.: $40,000 for the Stability-4-Families program, which will
provide stability services to 250+ moms/children.
· MentorKids USA: $23,000 for the iLEAD My Generation program, which will support
an innovative high school mentoring and leadership development program.
· Mission of Mercy: $25,000 for the Access to Health Care for Uninsured Families
program, to provide free primary medical care to uninsured families so they can
manage acute and chronic illnesses, thereby avoiding preventable hospital visits.
· Native American Connections: $250,000 for the Homeless Youth Services program,
which will provide funding for program operations at three Homeless Youth Services
sites: (1) HomeBase (emergency shelter); (2) Saguaro Ki (transitional housing) in
Central Phoenix, and (3) HomeBase Surprise in West Valley.
· New Life Center: $50,000 for the Emergency Shelter Program, which will protect
women and children experiencing homelessness due to domestic abuse.
· NourishPHX: $150,000 (over three years) for the Healthy Eating Program, which
will supplement the reclaimed food received from St. Mary's Food Bank with fresh
produce, dairy and meats purchased specifically to increase the nutritional value of
the boxes distributed.
· OCJ Kids: $30,000 for the Empowering Youth to Succeed in Life After Foster Care
program, which will improve the developmental delays, self-esteem, and life skills of
children who experienced pre-foster care abuse and help ensure the safety and well
Page 297
-being of foster teens' babies.
· Phoenix Performing Arts Center dba Herberger Theater Center: $25,000 for the
Wolf Trap program, which is a community outreach program in alignment with the
mission and guiding principles of the Herberger Theater to make the arts accessible
to the whole community and deliver quality arts education to thousands of children.
· Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central and Northern Arizona: $25,000 for the
Keeping Families Together Program, which will underwrite 237 nights of rest at
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central and Northern Arizona for families
traveling to the Valley to access specialized pediatric medical care for their critically
ill or injured child; life-saving medical care not available in their home communities.
· Southern Arizona Association for the Visually Impaired: $50,000 for the Reaching
Empowerment through Achievement and Learning Program for Blind Children,
which will help Phoenix children who are blind recover from learning loss of the
pandemic.
· SOUNDS Academy: $40,000 (over two years) for the Comprehensive Music
Program, which will reduce the inequity of music education by providing music
experiences and opportunities to under served youth in Phoenix.
· Southwest Autism Research & Resource Center: $180,000 (over two years) for the
Parent Training and Community Outreach Program, which will offer an evidence-
based training program for families living in rural or remote areas of Arizona who
support a child diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and provide outreach,
training, resources, and education to community organizations in rural and remote
areas throughout the state.
· Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine & Health Sciences (SCNM): $120,000
(over three years) for the SCNM Community Health Program, which will support
SCNM's Roosevelt Health Center which provides free health care to families in the
Roosevelt School District who would otherwise not be able to afford it.
· St. Mary's Food Bank: $100,000 for the St. Mary's Food Bank Skills Center, which
will improve the job readiness and economic security of vulnerable, homeless, and
formerly incarcerated people by training and helping place them into food industry
or warehouse jobs.
· Stand for Children Leadership Center: $30,000 (over three years) for the Every
Child Reads program, which will provide resources and training to increase literacy
habits in the home.
· Support My Club: $25,000 for the Support My Club program, which will re-engage
students in high school through clubs, teams, and extracurricular activities.
· Swift Youth Foundation: $15,000 for the Swift Youth Enrichment Program, which will
help expand Swift Youth Foundation (SYF), Youth Enrichment Program by 10
percent in the 2022-2023 school year. The program, which includes after-
school/Saturday programming and an annual Carnival, is part of the SYF's
Page 298
continuum of programming for low-income, high-risk youth.
· TechForce Foundation: $50,000 for the Women Techs Rock program, which will
promote diversity and inclusion in the transportation technician industry by engaging
women to pursue technician careers with outreach and scholarships.
· The Opportunity Tree: $25,000 for the Youth Transition Program-Self Sufficiency for
Youth with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities program, which will provide
employment training for youth with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
· The Phoenix Symphony: $77,578 for the Symphony for All program, which will
promote music education to students in low-income schools.
· The Reveille Foundation: $50,000 (over two years) for the Success Coach program,
which will provide wraparound services for former and current military personnel
and their families to ensure their basic housing, employment, and medical needs
are met.
· The Zion Institute: $150,000 for The Well: An Integrated Health Service Center,
which will support the expansion of The Well, an integrated human service campus
that will meet the needs of over 5,000 vulnerable City of Phoenix residents per year.
· Upward for Children and Families: $30,000 for the Lifting Children Upward Inclusive
Early Care and Education program, which will provide inclusive early care and
education to children with and without disabilities, helping to fill a tremendous
service gap as 30 percent of childcare centers remain closed in the aftermath of the
pandemic.
· Valley of the Sun United Way: $100,000 for the MC2026/General Support program,
which will activate solutions for every child, individual, and family in Maricopa
County.
· Valleywise Health Foundation: $75,000 for the Valleywise Health High-Risk
Perinatal Program, which will strengthen families and the community by improving
the health and safety of vulnerable women and children by ensuring that pregnant
women, those set to deliver, and newborn babies receive optimal resources to
realize exceptional health outcomes.
The gaming compact entered into the State of Arizona and various tribes calls for 12
percent of gaming revenue to be contributed to cities, towns and counties for
government services that benefit the general public including public safety, mitigation
of impacts of gaming and promotion of commerce, and economic development. The
Gila River Indian Community will notify the City, by resolution, of the Tribal Council, if it
desires to convey to the city a portion of its annual 12 percent local revenue-sharing
contribution.
Financial Impact
There is no budgetary impact to the City of Phoenix and no general-purpose funds are
Page 299
required. Entities that receive gaming grants are responsible for the management of
those funds.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Office of Government
Relations.
Page 300
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply, accept, and, if
awarded, enter into related agreements for up to $4,880,618.34 in new funding from
the Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) under the 2022 funding cycle. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse funds
as directed by GRIC in connection with these grants.
Summary
If awarded, these monies would be applied, as directed by GRIC, towards the
following:
City Applications
· Community and Economic Development: $152,577 (over three years) for the Mobile
Career Unit, which will fund software and licenses for the public's use while on
board the Mobile Career Unit.
· Office of Sustainability: $200,000 (over two years) for the Electric Vehicle Outreach
and Education Program, which will provide public education to improve attitudes
about and increase usage of electric vehicles.
· Phoenix Fire Department: $76,189.42 for the Special Events Emergency Response
Apparatus, which will enhance emergency medical response capabilities within the
footprint of special events with limited vehicle access due to crowd congestion or
space restriction.
Non-Profit Applications
· A Stepping Stone Foundation: $100,000 (over two years) for the Literacy Elevates
Arizona Families (LEAF) program, which will help fund two-generation education
(preschool, parent and adult education) with home visiting.
· Amanda Hope Rainbow Angels: $25,000 for the Moms Mentoring Program, which
will provide mentoring for moms whose children are battling cancer and other life-
threatening diseases.
· Arizona Educational Foundation: $25,000 for the Our World: Educators for
Indigenous Students program, which will provide free training for Phoenix-area
schools in how to better serve Indigenous students and their families.
Page 293
· Arizona Humane Society: $100,000 for the Saving Animals from Large-Scale
Hoarding Cases program, which will provide medical treatment to animals removed
from hazardous and unsafe large-scale hoarding cases and maintain a fleet of
animal ambulances used to transport the animals to the Second Chance Animal
Trauma Hospital. Funding will help Emergency Animal Medical Technicians
continue to support Phoenix Law Enforcement and provide lifesaving medical care
to animals rescued from inhumane conditions.
· Arizona Pet Project: $45,000 for the Bonded Family Project, which will remove
barriers to care and create pet-health equity among families in need.
· Arizona Science Center: $50,000 for STEM Learning Programs for Low-Income
Children, which will provide free focused field trips and Science on Wheels STEM
learning programs for 3,700 low-income children from Title 1 schools in the 2022-
2023 school year.
· Arizona Sustainability Alliance: $206,148 (over three years) for the Sow It Forward:
Vertical Garden Program, which will support the continued growth of the Sow It
Forward program and help expand into new school districts across the state.
· Assistance League of Phoenix: $50,000 for the Operation School Bell Wardrobes
for Children in Poverty program, which will help expand to meet a growing need.
Operation School Bell provides new school wardrobes, including a hygiene kit and
new book, to very low-income grade K-8 children attending Phoenix Metro Area
high-poverty, Title 1 schools.
· Aunt Rita's Foundation: $15,000 (over two years) for the HIVAZ Connect program,
which will support HIVAZ Connect, Aunt Rita's statewide information and referral
program, which provides HIV negative and positive individuals with information to
prevent HIV transmission, and connects people living with HIV to treatment,
assistance with housing, medications, etc.
· Ballet Arizona: $30,000 (over three years) for the Ballet Arizona's DanceAZ School
Residency Program, which will support the DanceAZ School Residency Program,
helping them partner with five Title 1 elementary schools in Maricopa County to
provide under-served youth with a consistent, high-quality arts education.
· Banner Health Foundation: $400,000 (over two years) for the Substance Use
Telehealth for Arizona Rural Communities program, which will expand Banner
Health's evidence-based, multidisciplinary substance use disorder treatment model
to rural communities through a combination of in-person and telegraph integrated
care.
· Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Arizona: $50,000 for the West Phoenix Site-
Based and Community-Based Mentoring program, which will provide mentoring to
at-risk youth in West Phoenix.
· Central Arizona Shelter Services: $225,000 (over three years) for the Project Haven
for Seniors Experiencing Homelessness program, which will support homeless
Page 294
shelter and wrap-around services for seniors in Phoenix, Arizona.
· Children's Museum of Phoenix: $270,000 (over three years) for the Children's
Museum of Phoenix's Free First Friday Nights program, which will open the
museum to the public for ten free nights and serving over 25,000 people per year
and to establish the IDEA Fellows Program by providing two paid fellowships for
individuals facing barriers and promoting diverse perspectives in their field.
· Chrysalis Veterans Services, Inc.: $300,000 (over three years) for the Improving
Economic Security by Strengthening the Veteran's Job Readiness program, which
provides funding to assist veterans to ensure their economic security, and can
consistently meet their essential needs in a sustainable manner and with dignity.
The program provides funding to assist with the material needs of the veteran so
they can be job ready.
· Civitan Foundation, Inc.: $75,884 for the Civitan MIDTOWN - Economic Mobility
and Transportation program, which will provide economic development
opportunities for special needs Arizonans through the new Civitan MIDTOWN
property on Thomas Road and 16th Street, which will provide job skills training,
social enterprise employment, economic stimulus through goods sold, and provide
no-cost transportation for special needs Arizonans to attend job opportunities and
regular employment.
· Creighton Community Foundation: $74,110.92 for the Native Foods and Flora
Activity Center on the Phoenix Grand Canalscape program, which will assist in the
creation of the Native Foods and Flora Activity Center for food and environmental
education.
· Duet: Partners in Health and Aging: $30,000 for the Improving the Health and
Wellness of Vulnerable Seniors program, which will help Duet provide a variety of
services (grocery shopping assistance, transport to medical appointments, etc.)
through its caring volunteers that meet the basic and other needs of homebound
seniors so they can remain in their homes and out of assistive living for as long as
possible.
· Educare Arizona: $50,000 for the Child Development Associate Certificate: A Two-
Generation Anti-Poverty Program, which will enable low-income individuals,
primarily mothers, to begin new careers while improving early childhood education
for thousands of young children in Arizona.
· Elevate Phoenix: $30,000 for the Improving At-Risk Youths' Academic Success and
Futures program, which will improve the academic success, life skills, literacy skills,
well-being, and future outcomes of low-income, at-risk urban youth.
· Foundation for Senior Living (FSL): $15,000 for the FSL Nutrition Program for
Under-Resourced Aging Adults program, which will support FSL's efforts to reduce
food insecurity among under-resourced aging adults, 60+ years of age and older.
· Fresh Start Women's Foundation: $50,000 for The Impact Program: Helping
Page 295
Women Achieve Self-Sufficiency program, which will empower women to achieve
self-sufficiency through an evidence-informed, holistic approach that focuses on job
-readiness, career training (including entrepreneurship, for those interested), and
employment in well-paying careers.
· Furnishing Dignity: $100,000 for the Essential Home Furnishings Program
Expansion, which will provide whole home furnishings to low-income children,
adults and families as they successfully exit shelter and transition to permanent
housing. Funding will consolidate storage units into one large warehouse space
with loading dock, and purchase a second gently used moving truck and program
supplies to support significant increases in donated home furnishings and demand
for services.
· Girl Scouts-Arizona Cactus-Pine Council: $15,000 for the Girl Scout Program, which
will support Girl Scout programming that promotes academic achievement, mental
wellness, and overall positive life outcomes for girls in Maricopa County.
· Greater Phoenix Chamber Foundation: $60,000 (over two years) for the
ElevateEdAZ program, which will support the strategic education and workforce
initiative ElevateEdAZ, which drives cross-sector innovation to identify and solve
Arizona's education to employment pathway issues. Funding will help deliver high-
quality work-based learning opportunities to students in the Greater Phoenix region
and beyond, preparing them to enter high-wage, high-skill, and high-demand
careers and graduate with industry-recognized credentials and early postsecondary
credit, and garner meaningful work-based learning experiences with business
professionals to strengthen and diversify the Greater Phoenix region's workforce.
· Hacienda, Inc.: $50,000 for the Hacienda Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Enhancements program, which will rehabilitate a new group home purchase into an
ADA compliant group home and convert other group home bathtub bathrooms into
floor level showers for its clients/residents who are wheelchair mobile.
· Hacienda, Inc.: $30,000 for the Hacienda Roof Repairs and Renovations project,
which will repair areas of the roof where leaks have been identified. Each year the
leaks get worse and new leaks appear. The roof affects client areas where some
programs are held.
· Hacienda, Inc.: $21,000 for the Hacienda Wheelchair Accessible Minivans project,
which funding will support the matching requirement of the Federal Transportation
Administration 5310 program to purchase two minivans for their group homes.
· Heard Museum: $25,000 for the Native Veterans Exhibition - "Unconquered: A
Legacy of Service", which will fund the creation and implementation of a special
exhibition dedicated to American Indian veterans in commemoration of the 10th
Anniversary of the Heard Museum's American Indian Veterans Memorial.
· Homeward Bound: $50,000 for the Empowering Today, Building Tomorrow project,
which will support families facing or experiencing homelessness in GED completion
Page 296
and gaining employment/job skills, so they can increase their economic security and
stability to break the cycle of poverty and homelessness.
· Hope Community Services: $30,000 for the Trauma Therapy for Low-Income
Children and Youth program, which will support Hope Community Services' (HCS)
specialized trauma therapy program for low-income children who have experienced
extreme, ongoing trauma. HCS' individualized therapies wrap children, and when
appropriate, their caregivers, in supportive services to increase their chances of
healing, getting back on a normal development path, and preventing long-term
trauma-related problems.
· Hushabye Nursery: $15,000 for the Hope for the Tiniest Victims of the opioid crisis
program, which will improve health outcomes from the Arizona opioid crisis.
· Life More Abundantly Pregnancy/Family Resource Center: $50,000 for the
Decreasing Pregnancy Complications and STD risks in South Phoenix program,
which will support the healthcare staffing, supplies, and occupancy costs.
· Live and Learn Program: $20,000 for the Economic Empowerment for Women
Program, which offers women living in poverty a path to stability and employment.
· Los Ninos Hospital, Inc. dba Innovative Home Health Nursing Services: $34,131 for
the Home Health Technology Services program, which will improve the quality of
patient care for home health services by using technology systems that increase
efficiency in medical records management, speed, and accuracy.
· Maggie's Place, Inc.: $40,000 for the Stability-4-Families program, which will
provide stability services to 250+ moms/children.
· MentorKids USA: $23,000 for the iLEAD My Generation program, which will support
an innovative high school mentoring and leadership development program.
· Mission of Mercy: $25,000 for the Access to Health Care for Uninsured Families
program, to provide free primary medical care to uninsured families so they can
manage acute and chronic illnesses, thereby avoiding preventable hospital visits.
· Native American Connections: $250,000 for the Homeless Youth Services program,
which will provide funding for program operations at three Homeless Youth Services
sites: (1) HomeBase (emergency shelter); (2) Saguaro Ki (transitional housing) in
Central Phoenix, and (3) HomeBase Surprise in West Valley.
· New Life Center: $50,000 for the Emergency Shelter Program, which will protect
women and children experiencing homelessness due to domestic abuse.
· NourishPHX: $150,000 (over three years) for the Healthy Eating Program, which
will supplement the reclaimed food received from St. Mary's Food Bank with fresh
produce, dairy and meats purchased specifically to increase the nutritional value of
the boxes distributed.
· OCJ Kids: $30,000 for the Empowering Youth to Succeed in Life After Foster Care
program, which will improve the developmental delays, self-esteem, and life skills of
children who experienced pre-foster care abuse and help ensure the safety and well
Page 297
-being of foster teens' babies.
· Phoenix Performing Arts Center dba Herberger Theater Center: $25,000 for the
Wolf Trap program, which is a community outreach program in alignment with the
mission and guiding principles of the Herberger Theater to make the arts accessible
to the whole community and deliver quality arts education to thousands of children.
· Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central and Northern Arizona: $25,000 for the
Keeping Families Together Program, which will underwrite 237 nights of rest at
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central and Northern Arizona for families
traveling to the Valley to access specialized pediatric medical care for their critically
ill or injured child; life-saving medical care not available in their home communities.
· Southern Arizona Association for the Visually Impaired: $50,000 for the Reaching
Empowerment through Achievement and Learning Program for Blind Children,
which will help Phoenix children who are blind recover from learning loss of the
pandemic.
· SOUNDS Academy: $40,000 (over two years) for the Comprehensive Music
Program, which will reduce the inequity of music education by providing music
experiences and opportunities to under served youth in Phoenix.
· Southwest Autism Research & Resource Center: $180,000 (over two years) for the
Parent Training and Community Outreach Program, which will offer an evidence-
based training program for families living in rural or remote areas of Arizona who
support a child diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and provide outreach,
training, resources, and education to community organizations in rural and remote
areas throughout the state.
· Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine & Health Sciences (SCNM): $120,000
(over three years) for the SCNM Community Health Program, which will support
SCNM's Roosevelt Health Center which provides free health care to families in the
Roosevelt School District who would otherwise not be able to afford it.
· St. Mary's Food Bank: $100,000 for the St. Mary's Food Bank Skills Center, which
will improve the job readiness and economic security of vulnerable, homeless, and
formerly incarcerated people by training and helping place them into food industry
or warehouse jobs.
· Stand for Children Leadership Center: $30,000 (over three years) for the Every
Child Reads program, which will provide resources and training to increase literacy
habits in the home.
· Support My Club: $25,000 for the Support My Club program, which will re-engage
students in high school through clubs, teams, and extracurricular activities.
· Swift Youth Foundation: $15,000 for the Swift Youth Enrichment Program, which will
help expand Swift Youth Foundation (SYF), Youth Enrichment Program by 10
percent in the 2022-2023 school year. The program, which includes after-
school/Saturday programming and an annual Carnival, is part of the SYF's
Page 298
continuum of programming for low-income, high-risk youth.
· TechForce Foundation: $50,000 for the Women Techs Rock program, which will
promote diversity and inclusion in the transportation technician industry by engaging
women to pursue technician careers with outreach and scholarships.
· The Opportunity Tree: $25,000 for the Youth Transition Program-Self Sufficiency for
Youth with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities program, which will provide
employment training for youth with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
· The Phoenix Symphony: $77,578 for the Symphony for All program, which will
promote music education to students in low-income schools.
· The Reveille Foundation: $50,000 (over two years) for the Success Coach program,
which will provide wraparound services for former and current military personnel
and their families to ensure their basic housing, employment, and medical needs
are met.
· The Zion Institute: $150,000 for The Well: An Integrated Health Service Center,
which will support the expansion of The Well, an integrated human service campus
that will meet the needs of over 5,000 vulnerable City of Phoenix residents per year.
· Upward for Children and Families: $30,000 for the Lifting Children Upward Inclusive
Early Care and Education program, which will provide inclusive early care and
education to children with and without disabilities, helping to fill a tremendous
service gap as 30 percent of childcare centers remain closed in the aftermath of the
pandemic.
· Valley of the Sun United Way: $100,000 for the MC2026/General Support program,
which will activate solutions for every child, individual, and family in Maricopa
County.
· Valleywise Health Foundation: $75,000 for the Valleywise Health High-Risk
Perinatal Program, which will strengthen families and the community by improving
the health and safety of vulnerable women and children by ensuring that pregnant
women, those set to deliver, and newborn babies receive optimal resources to
realize exceptional health outcomes.
The gaming compact entered into the State of Arizona and various tribes calls for 12
percent of gaming revenue to be contributed to cities, towns and counties for
government services that benefit the general public including public safety, mitigation
of impacts of gaming and promotion of commerce, and economic development. The
Gila River Indian Community will notify the City, by resolution, of the Tribal Council, if it
desires to convey to the city a portion of its annual 12 percent local revenue-sharing
contribution.
Financial Impact
There is no budgetary impact to the City of Phoenix and no general-purpose funds are
Page 299
required. Entities that receive gaming grants are responsible for the management of
those funds.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Office of Government
Relations.
Page 300
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Legal Representation Services Contracts (Ordinance S-
48865)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into agreements with
legal services providers to provide representation services to indigent defendants in
Phoenix Municipal Court for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the agreements
will not exceed $3.649 million.
Summary
The Public Defender's Office, through its contract holders, provides legal
representation services to indigent individuals charged with criminal offenses in
Phoenix Municipal Court. These services are provided in Phoenix Municipal Court
courtrooms, and 365 days a year at Maricopa County's Intake, Transfer and Release
(ITR) facility.
Procurement Information
On June 1, 2022 the City of Phoenix Public Defender Review Committee met to review
resumes and applications of attorneys and legal support service providers for provision
of legal defense services in Phoenix Municipal Court. The review process included
applications from current contract holders as well as individuals seeking to obtain a
contract for the first time. The Committee approved a list of those who meet the
minimum qualification requirements and who would be eligible for consideration for a
contract. The approved list contains more names than available contracts due to the
necessity of having attorneys available should an unexpected opening occur during
the course of the contract year. This procedure facilitates continuity in providing legal
services and minimizes delay in processing and resolution of cases.
Contract Term
Contract period is one year, starting July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
These assignments will have a financial impact of up to $3.649 million.
Funding is available in the Public Defender's Office operating budget.
Page 301
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public
Defender’s Office.
Page 302
Report
48865)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into agreements with
legal services providers to provide representation services to indigent defendants in
Phoenix Municipal Court for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the agreements
will not exceed $3.649 million.
Summary
The Public Defender's Office, through its contract holders, provides legal
representation services to indigent individuals charged with criminal offenses in
Phoenix Municipal Court. These services are provided in Phoenix Municipal Court
courtrooms, and 365 days a year at Maricopa County's Intake, Transfer and Release
(ITR) facility.
Procurement Information
On June 1, 2022 the City of Phoenix Public Defender Review Committee met to review
resumes and applications of attorneys and legal support service providers for provision
of legal defense services in Phoenix Municipal Court. The review process included
applications from current contract holders as well as individuals seeking to obtain a
contract for the first time. The Committee approved a list of those who meet the
minimum qualification requirements and who would be eligible for consideration for a
contract. The approved list contains more names than available contracts due to the
necessity of having attorneys available should an unexpected opening occur during
the course of the contract year. This procedure facilitates continuity in providing legal
services and minimizes delay in processing and resolution of cases.
Contract Term
Contract period is one year, starting July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
These assignments will have a financial impact of up to $3.649 million.
Funding is available in the Public Defender's Office operating budget.
Page 301
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public
Defender’s Office.
Page 302
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement between Maricopa County and City Prosecutor's
Office for Use of Maricopa County Phone Services (Ordinance S-48893)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Maricopa County's Office of Enterprise
Technology Department and the City of Phoenix Law Department, City Prosecutor's
Office for use of Maricopa County phone services at the shared Intake, Transfer and
Release facility at 2670 W. 28th Drive, Phoenix, Arizona. The estimated cost will not
exceed $15,000 for the term of this Agreement. Funding is available in the Law
Department Prosecutor's Office Technology Enhancement budget. Authorize the City
Controller to disburse funds.
Summary
The IGA establishes responsibilities and costs for the parties regarding use of the
County phone services at the shared County Intake, Transfer and Release facility at
2670 W. 28th Drive, in Phoenix. Arizona Revised Statute, section 11-952 authorizes
the County and City, as public agencies, to enter into IGAs for joint cooperative action
and agreement for the operation and use of shared services. The City Council
previously approved an IGA for these services and that agreement expires on June 30,
2022.
Contract Term
The IGA will be for a term of three years beginning July 1, 2022 and terminate on June
30, 2025. The agreement provides for extensions in increments of one year, upon
agreement of the parties.
Financial Impact
The estimated cost will not exceed $15,000 for the term of this Agreement. Funding is
available in the Law Department Prosecutor's Office Technology Enhancement budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 303
Report
Office for Use of Maricopa County Phone Services (Ordinance S-48893)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Maricopa County's Office of Enterprise
Technology Department and the City of Phoenix Law Department, City Prosecutor's
Office for use of Maricopa County phone services at the shared Intake, Transfer and
Release facility at 2670 W. 28th Drive, Phoenix, Arizona. The estimated cost will not
exceed $15,000 for the term of this Agreement. Funding is available in the Law
Department Prosecutor's Office Technology Enhancement budget. Authorize the City
Controller to disburse funds.
Summary
The IGA establishes responsibilities and costs for the parties regarding use of the
County phone services at the shared County Intake, Transfer and Release facility at
2670 W. 28th Drive, in Phoenix. Arizona Revised Statute, section 11-952 authorizes
the County and City, as public agencies, to enter into IGAs for joint cooperative action
and agreement for the operation and use of shared services. The City Council
previously approved an IGA for these services and that agreement expires on June 30,
2022.
Contract Term
The IGA will be for a term of three years beginning July 1, 2022 and terminate on June
30, 2025. The agreement provides for extensions in increments of one year, upon
agreement of the parties.
Financial Impact
The estimated cost will not exceed $15,000 for the term of this Agreement. Funding is
available in the Law Department Prosecutor's Office Technology Enhancement budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 303
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement between Maricopa County and City Public
Defender's Office for Use of Maricopa County Phone Services (Ordinance S-
48894)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Maricopa County's Office of Enterprise
Technology Department and the City of Phoenix Public Defender's Office for use of
Maricopa County phone services at the shared Intake, Transfer and Release facility at
2670 W. 28th Drive, Phoenix, Arizona. The estimated cost will not exceed $15,000 for
the term of this agreement. Funding is available in the Public Defender's
Telephone/Telecommunications budget. Further request that the City Controller be
authorized to disburse funds for the purposes of this ordinance.
Summary
The IGA establishes responsibilities and costs for the parties regarding use of County
phone services at the shared County Intake, Transfer and Release facility in Phoenix.
Arizona Revised Statutes, section 11-952 authorizes the County and City, as public
agencies, to enter into IGAs for joint cooperative action and agreement for the
operation and use of shared services. The City Council previously approved an IGA for
these services and that agreement expires on June 30, 2022.
Contract Term
The IGA will be for a term of three years beginning July 1, 2022 and terminate on June
30, 2025. The Agreement provides for extensions in increments of one year, upon
agreement of the parties.
Financial Impact
The estimated cost will not exceed $15,000. Funding is available in the Public
Defender's Telephone/Telecommunications budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public
Defender's Office.
Page 304
Report
Defender's Office for Use of Maricopa County Phone Services (Ordinance S-
48894)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Maricopa County's Office of Enterprise
Technology Department and the City of Phoenix Public Defender's Office for use of
Maricopa County phone services at the shared Intake, Transfer and Release facility at
2670 W. 28th Drive, Phoenix, Arizona. The estimated cost will not exceed $15,000 for
the term of this agreement. Funding is available in the Public Defender's
Telephone/Telecommunications budget. Further request that the City Controller be
authorized to disburse funds for the purposes of this ordinance.
Summary
The IGA establishes responsibilities and costs for the parties regarding use of County
phone services at the shared County Intake, Transfer and Release facility in Phoenix.
Arizona Revised Statutes, section 11-952 authorizes the County and City, as public
agencies, to enter into IGAs for joint cooperative action and agreement for the
operation and use of shared services. The City Council previously approved an IGA for
these services and that agreement expires on June 30, 2022.
Contract Term
The IGA will be for a term of three years beginning July 1, 2022 and terminate on June
30, 2025. The Agreement provides for extensions in increments of one year, upon
agreement of the parties.
Financial Impact
The estimated cost will not exceed $15,000. Funding is available in the Public
Defender's Telephone/Telecommunications budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public
Defender's Office.
Page 304
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
***ITEM CORRECTED (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** ARPA Phoenix Resilient Food
System Programs Second Tranche - Amendments for Continuing Programs
(Ordinance S-48884)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
Agreements: 154941 with Local First Arizona Foundation; 155024 with Local Initiatives
Support Corporation; 155310 with TigerMountain Foundation; 155311 with Central
Arizona Land Trust; 155313 with NxT Horizon, LLC; 155314 with Lehr Innovations,
LLC; and 155362 with Thrive Consultancy, Inc., to provide additional funding and
extend the contract period to continue the programs established in year one of the
Phoenix Resilient Food System category. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. Funding is available through the
City’s allocation of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding and is in the Phoenix
Resilient Food System category of the ARPA Strategic Plan approved by the Mayor
and Council. There is no impact to the General Fund. The additional aggregate
expenditures included in these amendments will not exceed $3,960,650.
Summary
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Office of Environmental Programs (OEP)
developed a food assistance plan to address the food needs of vulnerable populations
and communities impacted by COVID-19. The plan provides: 1) access to healthy
foods for impacted populations; 2) infrastructure assistance regarding transportation
and delivery with a focus on home delivery; 3) support for food banks, food pantries
and community food support agencies; 4) support for increased local food production;
and 5) business and employment opportunities throughout the food system spectrum.
Continuing Programs
The following continuing programs will provide economic and business opportunities
and training, empower residents to grow healthy food in their own backyards to
improve health, promote physical activity, and decrease food insecurity and hunger,
and preserve urban farmland in Phoenix.
Economic Development and Innovation
Feed Phoenix Program - Local First Arizona Foundation
Local First Arizona Foundation (LFAF) will continue to provide administrative and
Page 305
financial support through issuance of city-wide grants to local farmers, restaurants,
catering, including event venues with catering services, community-supported
agriculture, food hubs, and mobile markets, demonstrating capacity for food
distribution services to vulnerable populations impacted by COVID-19.
Worker Cooperative Sustainable Food System Business Incubator and Training
Program - Thrive Consultancy Inc.
Thrive Consultancy Inc. (Thrive) will continue to provide training on sustainable
cooperative food entrepreneurship, including operational, legal, financial, and
marketing practices for a cooperative food business. The scope of services includes
workshops, and three 10-week training courses, including one in Spanish. Thrive will
serve as a subrecipient and will continue to administer, manage, and develop the
program
Equity and Inclusion
Funds to Feed Phoenix Program - LISC Phoenix
Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) will continue to provide administrative and
financial support through issuance of grants to organizations city-wide, including
grassroots, community, nonprofits, health, social service providers and public schools
demonstrating capacity and need for food distribution services to vulnerable
populations impacted by COVID-19.
Local Food Consumption/Production
Phoenix Backyard Garden Program - Lehr, Nxt, TigerMountain
Lehr Innovations LLC (Lehr), NxT Horizon LLC (NxT), and TigerMountain Foundation
(TMF) will continue to install backyard gardens using aquaponics, growing produce
and protein (fish and shrimp), and raised beds. These systems will be installed for up
to an additional 180 residents living in the following planning areas: Alhambra, Central
City, Estrella, Laveen, Maryvale and South Mountain.
· Lehr will provide installation of up to 56 LEHR Gardens (raised bed system),
including all materials, supplies, equipment, and labor and will provide on call
training, maintenance, and repair services for 12 months.
· NxT will provide installation of up to 56 Aquaponics Victory Gardens, including all
materials, supplies, equipment and labor, 10 hours of education per system plus on
call training, maintenance, and repair services for 12 months.
· TMF will provide up to 66 Tiger Eye Gardens (raised bed system), including all
materials, supplies, equipment, and labor, on call training, maintenance, and repair
services for 12 months.
Page 306
Farmland Preservation Program - Central Arizona Land Trust
Central Arizona Land Trust (CALT) will continue to administer and manage the
program to conserve urban farmland within the boundaries of the City through
conservation easements. CALT will conduct outreach for the program, manage
contractors providing services to support placement of a conservation easement on
qualified properties, and award grant funding to eligible entities for placement of
conservation easements on qualified properties.
Procurement Information
Services may be procured, as needed, in accordance with Administrative Regulation
3.10 to implement and administer programs intended to prevent, prepare for, and
respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Contract Term
The contract term will be extended as follows:
· LFAF from Aug. 30, 2022 to Jan. 31, 2023;
· LISC from Dec. 31, 2022 to Jan. 31, 2024;
· TMF from April 30, 2023 to May 31, 2024;
· CALT from Oct. 31, 2022 to June 30, 2023;
· NxT from April 30, 2023 to May 31, 2024;
· Lehr from April 30, 2023 to May 31, 2024; and
· Thrive from Oct. 31, 2022 to Dec. 31, 2023.
All agreements may be extended based on available funding, which extensions may
be executed by the City Manager, or his designee.
Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City’s
allocation of ARPA funding and is in the Phoenix Resilient Food System category of
the ARPA Strategic Plan approved by Mayor and Council.
The funding breakdown is as follows:
· LFAF - The initial authorization for Agreement 154941 was for $2.7 million. A
previous amendment increased the authorization for the agreement by $65,000.
This amendment will increase the authorization by an additional $300,000, for a
new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $3,065,000.
· LISC - The initial authorization for Agreement 155024 was for $1.95 million. A
previous amendment increased the authorization for the agreement by $115,000.
This amendment will increase the authorization by an additional $500,000, for a
Page 307
new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $2,565,000.
· TMF - The initial authorization for Agreement 155310 was for $138,000. A previous
amendment increased the authorization for the agreement by $30,300. This
amendment will increase the authorization by an additional $330,000, for a new
total not-to-exceed agreement value of $498,300.
· CALT - The initial authorization for Agreement 155311 was for $1 million. This
amendment will increase the authorization for the agreement by an additional $2
million, for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $3 million.
· NxT - The initial authorization for Agreement 155313 was for $145,000. Previous
amendments increased the authorization for the agreement by $58,505. This
amendment will increase the authorization by an additional $352,000, for a new
total not-to-exceed agreement value of $555,505.
· Lehr - The initial authorization for Agreement 155314 was for $118,000. A previous
amendment increased the authorization for the agreement by $4,500. This
amendment will increase the authorization for the agreement by an additional
$228,650, for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $351,150.
· Thrive - The initial authorization for Agreement 155362 was for $200,000. This
amendment will increase the authorization by an additional $250,000, for a new
total not-to-exceed agreement value of $450,000.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· The ARPA Strategic Plan on June 8, 2021;
· Agreements 154941 and 155024 (Ordinance S-47812) on July 1, 2021;
· Agreements 155310, 155311, 15313, 155314 and 155362 (Ordinance S-47932) on
Sept. 8, 2021;
· Agreement 155313 - Amendment (Ordinance S-48211) on Dec. 15, 2021;
· Agreement 155310 - Amendment (Ordinance S-48388) on March 2, 2022;
· Agreements 154941 and 155024 - Amendments (Ordinance S-48543) on April 20,
2022; and
· ARPA Phoenix Resilient Food System allocation for the second tranche on June 7,
2022.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Karen Peters and the Office of Environmental Programs.
Page 308
Report
System Programs Second Tranche - Amendments for Continuing Programs
(Ordinance S-48884)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
Agreements: 154941 with Local First Arizona Foundation; 155024 with Local Initiatives
Support Corporation; 155310 with TigerMountain Foundation; 155311 with Central
Arizona Land Trust; 155313 with NxT Horizon, LLC; 155314 with Lehr Innovations,
LLC; and 155362 with Thrive Consultancy, Inc., to provide additional funding and
extend the contract period to continue the programs established in year one of the
Phoenix Resilient Food System category. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. Funding is available through the
City’s allocation of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding and is in the Phoenix
Resilient Food System category of the ARPA Strategic Plan approved by the Mayor
and Council. There is no impact to the General Fund. The additional aggregate
expenditures included in these amendments will not exceed $3,960,650.
Summary
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Office of Environmental Programs (OEP)
developed a food assistance plan to address the food needs of vulnerable populations
and communities impacted by COVID-19. The plan provides: 1) access to healthy
foods for impacted populations; 2) infrastructure assistance regarding transportation
and delivery with a focus on home delivery; 3) support for food banks, food pantries
and community food support agencies; 4) support for increased local food production;
and 5) business and employment opportunities throughout the food system spectrum.
Continuing Programs
The following continuing programs will provide economic and business opportunities
and training, empower residents to grow healthy food in their own backyards to
improve health, promote physical activity, and decrease food insecurity and hunger,
and preserve urban farmland in Phoenix.
Economic Development and Innovation
Feed Phoenix Program - Local First Arizona Foundation
Local First Arizona Foundation (LFAF) will continue to provide administrative and
Page 305
financial support through issuance of city-wide grants to local farmers, restaurants,
catering, including event venues with catering services, community-supported
agriculture, food hubs, and mobile markets, demonstrating capacity for food
distribution services to vulnerable populations impacted by COVID-19.
Worker Cooperative Sustainable Food System Business Incubator and Training
Program - Thrive Consultancy Inc.
Thrive Consultancy Inc. (Thrive) will continue to provide training on sustainable
cooperative food entrepreneurship, including operational, legal, financial, and
marketing practices for a cooperative food business. The scope of services includes
workshops, and three 10-week training courses, including one in Spanish. Thrive will
serve as a subrecipient and will continue to administer, manage, and develop the
program
Equity and Inclusion
Funds to Feed Phoenix Program - LISC Phoenix
Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) will continue to provide administrative and
financial support through issuance of grants to organizations city-wide, including
grassroots, community, nonprofits, health, social service providers and public schools
demonstrating capacity and need for food distribution services to vulnerable
populations impacted by COVID-19.
Local Food Consumption/Production
Phoenix Backyard Garden Program - Lehr, Nxt, TigerMountain
Lehr Innovations LLC (Lehr), NxT Horizon LLC (NxT), and TigerMountain Foundation
(TMF) will continue to install backyard gardens using aquaponics, growing produce
and protein (fish and shrimp), and raised beds. These systems will be installed for up
to an additional 180 residents living in the following planning areas: Alhambra, Central
City, Estrella, Laveen, Maryvale and South Mountain.
· Lehr will provide installation of up to 56 LEHR Gardens (raised bed system),
including all materials, supplies, equipment, and labor and will provide on call
training, maintenance, and repair services for 12 months.
· NxT will provide installation of up to 56 Aquaponics Victory Gardens, including all
materials, supplies, equipment and labor, 10 hours of education per system plus on
call training, maintenance, and repair services for 12 months.
· TMF will provide up to 66 Tiger Eye Gardens (raised bed system), including all
materials, supplies, equipment, and labor, on call training, maintenance, and repair
services for 12 months.
Page 306
Farmland Preservation Program - Central Arizona Land Trust
Central Arizona Land Trust (CALT) will continue to administer and manage the
program to conserve urban farmland within the boundaries of the City through
conservation easements. CALT will conduct outreach for the program, manage
contractors providing services to support placement of a conservation easement on
qualified properties, and award grant funding to eligible entities for placement of
conservation easements on qualified properties.
Procurement Information
Services may be procured, as needed, in accordance with Administrative Regulation
3.10 to implement and administer programs intended to prevent, prepare for, and
respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Contract Term
The contract term will be extended as follows:
· LFAF from Aug. 30, 2022 to Jan. 31, 2023;
· LISC from Dec. 31, 2022 to Jan. 31, 2024;
· TMF from April 30, 2023 to May 31, 2024;
· CALT from Oct. 31, 2022 to June 30, 2023;
· NxT from April 30, 2023 to May 31, 2024;
· Lehr from April 30, 2023 to May 31, 2024; and
· Thrive from Oct. 31, 2022 to Dec. 31, 2023.
All agreements may be extended based on available funding, which extensions may
be executed by the City Manager, or his designee.
Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City’s
allocation of ARPA funding and is in the Phoenix Resilient Food System category of
the ARPA Strategic Plan approved by Mayor and Council.
The funding breakdown is as follows:
· LFAF - The initial authorization for Agreement 154941 was for $2.7 million. A
previous amendment increased the authorization for the agreement by $65,000.
This amendment will increase the authorization by an additional $300,000, for a
new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $3,065,000.
· LISC - The initial authorization for Agreement 155024 was for $1.95 million. A
previous amendment increased the authorization for the agreement by $115,000.
This amendment will increase the authorization by an additional $500,000, for a
Page 307
new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $2,565,000.
· TMF - The initial authorization for Agreement 155310 was for $138,000. A previous
amendment increased the authorization for the agreement by $30,300. This
amendment will increase the authorization by an additional $330,000, for a new
total not-to-exceed agreement value of $498,300.
· CALT - The initial authorization for Agreement 155311 was for $1 million. This
amendment will increase the authorization for the agreement by an additional $2
million, for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $3 million.
· NxT - The initial authorization for Agreement 155313 was for $145,000. Previous
amendments increased the authorization for the agreement by $58,505. This
amendment will increase the authorization by an additional $352,000, for a new
total not-to-exceed agreement value of $555,505.
· Lehr - The initial authorization for Agreement 155314 was for $118,000. A previous
amendment increased the authorization for the agreement by $4,500. This
amendment will increase the authorization for the agreement by an additional
$228,650, for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $351,150.
· Thrive - The initial authorization for Agreement 155362 was for $200,000. This
amendment will increase the authorization by an additional $250,000, for a new
total not-to-exceed agreement value of $450,000.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· The ARPA Strategic Plan on June 8, 2021;
· Agreements 154941 and 155024 (Ordinance S-47812) on July 1, 2021;
· Agreements 155310, 155311, 15313, 155314 and 155362 (Ordinance S-47932) on
Sept. 8, 2021;
· Agreement 155313 - Amendment (Ordinance S-48211) on Dec. 15, 2021;
· Agreement 155310 - Amendment (Ordinance S-48388) on March 2, 2022;
· Agreements 154941 and 155024 - Amendments (Ordinance S-48543) on April 20,
2022; and
· ARPA Phoenix Resilient Food System allocation for the second tranche on June 7,
2022.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Karen Peters and the Office of Environmental Programs.
Page 308
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Operating Funds for Phoenix Starfish Place (Ordinance S-48880)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into any agreements
as necessary and make payments to Phoenix Starfish Place Corporation in an amount
up to $1.2 million over a period of three years to finance ongoing operating expenses.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item.
Summary
Phoenix Starfish Place Corporation is organized and operated exclusively as an
instrumentality of the City of Phoenix, dedicated to the healing and empowerment of
victims of human trafficking by providing safe housing, case management and
supportive services to its residents. Federal funds are not available to support the
community's operations and capital improvement needs to make the property true
transitional housing.
Procurement Information
In accordance with A.R. 3.10 a Sole Source Determination due to Unique Nature of the
Supplier was fully approved.
Contract Term
The term of any agreement(s) will end no later than June 30, 2025.
Financial Impact
The estimated annual expenditure is approximately $400,000 annually for a total of
$1.2 million over the three years.
Location
Council District: 3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.
Page 309
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into any agreements
as necessary and make payments to Phoenix Starfish Place Corporation in an amount
up to $1.2 million over a period of three years to finance ongoing operating expenses.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item.
Summary
Phoenix Starfish Place Corporation is organized and operated exclusively as an
instrumentality of the City of Phoenix, dedicated to the healing and empowerment of
victims of human trafficking by providing safe housing, case management and
supportive services to its residents. Federal funds are not available to support the
community's operations and capital improvement needs to make the property true
transitional housing.
Procurement Information
In accordance with A.R. 3.10 a Sole Source Determination due to Unique Nature of the
Supplier was fully approved.
Contract Term
The term of any agreement(s) will end no later than June 30, 2025.
Financial Impact
The estimated annual expenditure is approximately $400,000 annually for a total of
$1.2 million over the three years.
Location
Council District: 3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.
Page 309
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Authorization to Accept and Disburse Area Agency on Aging, Region One,
Funding for Home Delivered Meal Program (Ordinance S-48842)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept additional Home
Delivered Meals funding from the Area Agency on Aging, Region One, Inc. (AAA) in
the amount of $2,410,000. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept,
and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item.
Summary
In spring 2019, the City of Phoenix was awarded a five-year grant from the Area
Agency on Aging, Region One, which began July 1, 2019, and ends June 30, 2024.
Funds provided to the City of Phoenix through AAA are used to fund the City’s Home
Delivered Meals (HDM) program. The HDM program assists with increasing the
nutrient intake of seniors, homebound, and disabled adults at nutrition risk to allow
them to remain independent in their homes.
Contract Term
The initial term of the contract under the five-year grant began July 1, 2019, through
June 30, 2020, with four one-year options to extend. AAA requires the City to reapply
for funding and enter into a new contract for each year authorized under the grant.
The term of this contract is for the extension of the fourth-year option which begins
July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023. The approval and execution of this amendment is
the fourth year within the five-year grant.
Financial Impact
The contract total shall not exceed $2,410,000 for the term beginning July 1, 2022,
through June 30, 2023. There is a 10 percent match requirement for this term totaling
$241,000.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-45521 was adopted on April 3, 2019, authorizing the Human Services
Department (HSD) to apply for, accept funding from, and enter into an initial contract
with AAA for an amount up to $2,082,325 annually and authorizing the City Treasurer
and City Controller to accept and disburse these funds.
Page 310
Ordinance S-47112 was adopted on Nov. 18, 2020, authorizing HSD to accept an
additional $2,843,045 in funding from AAA for fiscal year (FY) 2020-21 and authorizing
the City Treasurer and City Controller to accept and disburse these funds.
Ordinance S-47312 was adopted on Feb. 17, 2021, authorizing HSD to accept an
additional $500,000 in funding from AAA for FY 2020-21 and authorizing the City
Treasurer and City Controller to accept and disburse these funds.
Ordinance S-47799 was adopted on July 1, 2021, authorizing HSD to accept an
additional $5,425,370 in funding from AAA for FY 2021-22 and authorizing the City
Treasurer and City Controller to accept and disburse these funds.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.
Page 311
Report
Funding for Home Delivered Meal Program (Ordinance S-48842)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept additional Home
Delivered Meals funding from the Area Agency on Aging, Region One, Inc. (AAA) in
the amount of $2,410,000. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept,
and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item.
Summary
In spring 2019, the City of Phoenix was awarded a five-year grant from the Area
Agency on Aging, Region One, which began July 1, 2019, and ends June 30, 2024.
Funds provided to the City of Phoenix through AAA are used to fund the City’s Home
Delivered Meals (HDM) program. The HDM program assists with increasing the
nutrient intake of seniors, homebound, and disabled adults at nutrition risk to allow
them to remain independent in their homes.
Contract Term
The initial term of the contract under the five-year grant began July 1, 2019, through
June 30, 2020, with four one-year options to extend. AAA requires the City to reapply
for funding and enter into a new contract for each year authorized under the grant.
The term of this contract is for the extension of the fourth-year option which begins
July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023. The approval and execution of this amendment is
the fourth year within the five-year grant.
Financial Impact
The contract total shall not exceed $2,410,000 for the term beginning July 1, 2022,
through June 30, 2023. There is a 10 percent match requirement for this term totaling
$241,000.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-45521 was adopted on April 3, 2019, authorizing the Human Services
Department (HSD) to apply for, accept funding from, and enter into an initial contract
with AAA for an amount up to $2,082,325 annually and authorizing the City Treasurer
and City Controller to accept and disburse these funds.
Page 310
Ordinance S-47112 was adopted on Nov. 18, 2020, authorizing HSD to accept an
additional $2,843,045 in funding from AAA for fiscal year (FY) 2020-21 and authorizing
the City Treasurer and City Controller to accept and disburse these funds.
Ordinance S-47312 was adopted on Feb. 17, 2021, authorizing HSD to accept an
additional $500,000 in funding from AAA for FY 2020-21 and authorizing the City
Treasurer and City Controller to accept and disburse these funds.
Ordinance S-47799 was adopted on July 1, 2021, authorizing HSD to accept an
additional $5,425,370 in funding from AAA for FY 2021-22 and authorizing the City
Treasurer and City Controller to accept and disburse these funds.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.
Page 311
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Client Services Portal System Integration (Ordinance S-48878)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with VisionLink, Inc. to provide a customer service portal system integration for the
Human Services Department case management system in an amount not to exceed
$626,747 for a five-year period, with two five-year options to extend at the discretion of
the City Manager, or his designee. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding
for this system is available through the City's allocation of the American Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA) funding received from the federal government and is under the City
Operations category, as well as additional funding within the Human Services
Department's Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget.
Summary
The Human Services Department coordinates services for individuals and families who
are unable to meet their basic needs. Programs are funded by various federal, state
and city grants and are designed to provide a comprehensive array of services to
individuals meeting program eligibility requirements. The client services portal is a
cloud-based source system where residents can apply for emergency rental and utility
assistance on behalf of themselves and/or household members. The system manages
financial assistance requests, client questionnaires, supporting documentation, and
communication with caseworkers.
Procurement Information
On Jan. 12, 2022, RFP-22-CSSD-54 was issued in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10 for Competitive Sealed Proposals. Eight offers were received on Feb.
21, 2022. Seven offers were determined to be responsive and responsible to the
solicitation requirements. One offer was found non-responsive and removed from
award consideration.
A Best and Final Offer (BAFO) invitation was issued to all eligible vendors informing
them of the project budget and requesting their best overall cost. One offer was
deemed non-responsible due to an over budget response to the BAFO and was
removed from award consideration.
Page 312
The six remaining offers were scored on the following criteria with an overall available
point value of 1,000.
Criteria and Possible Points:
· Requirements Implemented on a Robust, Source and Managed Platform - 400
possible points;
· Proven Methodology - 200 possible points;
· Organization Experience and Capacity - 200 possible points; and
· Overall Cost - 200 possible points.
The scores were as follows:
· Autocene, Inc. - 575 points;
· DLT Solutions - 257 points;
· Empyra, Inc. - 435 points;
· Intellectx, Inc. - 482 points;
· Kinetech Cloud, Inc. - 480 points; and
· VisionLink, Inc. - 529 points
It is the consensus of the evaluation panel to recommend a contract award to
VisionLink, Inc.
Contract Term
The contract term shall begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, and will end on June 30, 2027,
with two five-year options to extend, which may be exercised at the discretion of the
City Manager or designee.
Financial Impact
Expenditures shall not exceed $626,747 over the life of the contract. Funding for this
system is available through the City's allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA) funding received from the federal government and is under the City Operations
category. The final six months of the contract will be paid using a different funding
within the Human Services Department's FY 2026-27 budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item is a part of the City's ARPA Strategic Plan, City Operations category, which
was approved at the City's Policy Council meeting held on June 8, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.
Page 313
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with VisionLink, Inc. to provide a customer service portal system integration for the
Human Services Department case management system in an amount not to exceed
$626,747 for a five-year period, with two five-year options to extend at the discretion of
the City Manager, or his designee. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding
for this system is available through the City's allocation of the American Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA) funding received from the federal government and is under the City
Operations category, as well as additional funding within the Human Services
Department's Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget.
Summary
The Human Services Department coordinates services for individuals and families who
are unable to meet their basic needs. Programs are funded by various federal, state
and city grants and are designed to provide a comprehensive array of services to
individuals meeting program eligibility requirements. The client services portal is a
cloud-based source system where residents can apply for emergency rental and utility
assistance on behalf of themselves and/or household members. The system manages
financial assistance requests, client questionnaires, supporting documentation, and
communication with caseworkers.
Procurement Information
On Jan. 12, 2022, RFP-22-CSSD-54 was issued in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10 for Competitive Sealed Proposals. Eight offers were received on Feb.
21, 2022. Seven offers were determined to be responsive and responsible to the
solicitation requirements. One offer was found non-responsive and removed from
award consideration.
A Best and Final Offer (BAFO) invitation was issued to all eligible vendors informing
them of the project budget and requesting their best overall cost. One offer was
deemed non-responsible due to an over budget response to the BAFO and was
removed from award consideration.
Page 312
The six remaining offers were scored on the following criteria with an overall available
point value of 1,000.
Criteria and Possible Points:
· Requirements Implemented on a Robust, Source and Managed Platform - 400
possible points;
· Proven Methodology - 200 possible points;
· Organization Experience and Capacity - 200 possible points; and
· Overall Cost - 200 possible points.
The scores were as follows:
· Autocene, Inc. - 575 points;
· DLT Solutions - 257 points;
· Empyra, Inc. - 435 points;
· Intellectx, Inc. - 482 points;
· Kinetech Cloud, Inc. - 480 points; and
· VisionLink, Inc. - 529 points
It is the consensus of the evaluation panel to recommend a contract award to
VisionLink, Inc.
Contract Term
The contract term shall begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, and will end on June 30, 2027,
with two five-year options to extend, which may be exercised at the discretion of the
City Manager or designee.
Financial Impact
Expenditures shall not exceed $626,747 over the life of the contract. Funding for this
system is available through the City's allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA) funding received from the federal government and is under the City Operations
category. The final six months of the contract will be paid using a different funding
within the Human Services Department's FY 2026-27 budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item is a part of the City's ARPA Strategic Plan, City Operations category, which
was approved at the City's Policy Council meeting held on June 8, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.
Page 313
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Contract with Community Bridges Inc. for American Rescue Plan Act Homeless
Services (Ordinance S-48895)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Community Bridges Inc. (CBI) to lease and operate approximately 120 hotel
rooms as bridge shelter for homeless and at-risk persons and to provide related
supportive services in an amount not to exceed $8.1 million. The term the agreement
will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, and end on or before Dec. 31, 2024. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. There
is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City’s allocation of
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding received from the federal government and
is under the City’s Affordable Housing and Homelessness category of the strategic
plan.
Summary
CBI will partner with the City of Phoenix, Human Services Department, Homeless
Services Division to provide bridge housing and supportive services to individuals
experiencing homelessness. Temporary lodging will be provided to individuals
experiencing homelessness as a service provider moves individuals to either housing
or appropriate services with the end goal of ending their homelessness. Supportive
services will be provided to support long term success in retaining housing.
Contract Term
The term of each contract will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, and end on or before
Dec. 31, 2024.
Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City’s
allocation of ARPA funding and is under the City’s Affordable Housing and
Homelessness category of the strategic plan.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.
Page 314
Report
Services (Ordinance S-48895)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Community Bridges Inc. (CBI) to lease and operate approximately 120 hotel
rooms as bridge shelter for homeless and at-risk persons and to provide related
supportive services in an amount not to exceed $8.1 million. The term the agreement
will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, and end on or before Dec. 31, 2024. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. There
is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City’s allocation of
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding received from the federal government and
is under the City’s Affordable Housing and Homelessness category of the strategic
plan.
Summary
CBI will partner with the City of Phoenix, Human Services Department, Homeless
Services Division to provide bridge housing and supportive services to individuals
experiencing homelessness. Temporary lodging will be provided to individuals
experiencing homelessness as a service provider moves individuals to either housing
or appropriate services with the end goal of ending their homelessness. Supportive
services will be provided to support long term success in retaining housing.
Contract Term
The term of each contract will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, and end on or before
Dec. 31, 2024.
Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City’s
allocation of ARPA funding and is under the City’s Affordable Housing and
Homelessness category of the strategic plan.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.
Page 314
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Online Access Electronic Books - RFA 17-072 - Amendment (Ordinance S-48830)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
contract 144194 with Skillsoft Corporation to extend the contract term and add funds
for the purchase of Online Access Electronic Books for the Library department. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures will not exceed $54,500.
Summary
The contract provides the Library Department the ability to purchase unlimited,
simultaneous access to over 25,000 eBooks. The eBooks focus on topics related to
business, professional development, human resources, information technology, as well
as thousands of books, research reports, book summaries and best practices. In
addition, the contract provides access to the Leadership Channel Online, an Integrated
solution featuring over 4,500 videos. The Phoenix Public Library is the only public
library in Maricopa County to offer these resources. This amendment will allow staff
additional time to complete a new procurement.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through Aug. 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $54,500 in additional funds, the revised total value of the contract will
not exceed $327,867. Funds are available in the Library Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Online Access Electronic Books Contract 144194 (Ordinance S-43087) on December
14, 2016;
• Online Access Electronic Books Contract 144194 (Ordinance S-47792) on July 1,
Page 315
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.
Page 316
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
contract 144194 with Skillsoft Corporation to extend the contract term and add funds
for the purchase of Online Access Electronic Books for the Library department. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures will not exceed $54,500.
Summary
The contract provides the Library Department the ability to purchase unlimited,
simultaneous access to over 25,000 eBooks. The eBooks focus on topics related to
business, professional development, human resources, information technology, as well
as thousands of books, research reports, book summaries and best practices. In
addition, the contract provides access to the Leadership Channel Online, an Integrated
solution featuring over 4,500 videos. The Phoenix Public Library is the only public
library in Maricopa County to offer these resources. This amendment will allow staff
additional time to complete a new procurement.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through Aug. 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $54,500 in additional funds, the revised total value of the contract will
not exceed $327,867. Funds are available in the Library Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Online Access Electronic Books Contract 144194 (Ordinance S-43087) on December
14, 2016;
• Online Access Electronic Books Contract 144194 (Ordinance S-47792) on July 1,
Page 315
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.
Page 316
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Library eCard Patron Online Verification and Services- RFA 16-140- Amendment
(Ordinance S-48855)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 143062 with Quipu Group, LLC. for the purchase of
Library eCard Patron Online Verification and Services of residency verification, name
matching, and on-going support and transaction fees for the City's Library Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $12,000.
Summary
This contractor provides the City of Phoenix Library eCard service as a secure and
authenticated way for new card members to apply for a library card. This contract is
necessary as it also allows the Library Department to extend the functionality of the
service to renew cards once they expire to existing card members. This service will
assist to reduce staff time from performing this task significantly and will further allow
staff members to positively impact the department in other areas of need.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $12,000 in additional funds, the revised total value of the contract will
not exceed $105,150. Funds are available in the Library Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
•Library eCard Patron Online Verification and Services Contract 143062 Ordinance S-
42693 on June 22, 2016.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the
Library Department.
Page 317
Report
(Ordinance S-48855)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 143062 with Quipu Group, LLC. for the purchase of
Library eCard Patron Online Verification and Services of residency verification, name
matching, and on-going support and transaction fees for the City's Library Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $12,000.
Summary
This contractor provides the City of Phoenix Library eCard service as a secure and
authenticated way for new card members to apply for a library card. This contract is
necessary as it also allows the Library Department to extend the functionality of the
service to renew cards once they expire to existing card members. This service will
assist to reduce staff time from performing this task significantly and will further allow
staff members to positively impact the department in other areas of need.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $12,000 in additional funds, the revised total value of the contract will
not exceed $105,150. Funds are available in the Library Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
•Library eCard Patron Online Verification and Services Contract 143062 Ordinance S-
42693 on June 22, 2016.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the
Library Department.
Page 317
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Online Language Learning Resources - RFP 16- 217-Amendment (Ordinance S-
48872)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 143582 with Pronunciator LLC to extend contract term. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $19,500.
Summary
This contract provides Phoenix Public Library access to the eLibrary collection 24
hours-a-day, seven days-a-week. Within this collection, the Vendor provides access to
its web-based language learning resources with 164 languages taught in 146 home
languages and an average of 10,000 instructional phrases per language. This include
both ESL and ASL. In addition to the courses, it also offers feature films with integrated
drills and quizzes, with over 6 million hours of downloadable audio lessons, major label
music with lyrics; City video tours; and a downloadable app for use on mobile devices
by Library customers.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Contract Term
Upon approval of this item, the contract will be extended through Aug. 31, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $19,500 in additional funds, the revised total value of the contract will
not exceed $145,250. Funds are available in the Library Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Online Language Learning Resource Contract 143582 (Ordinance S-42803) on Aug.
31, 2016;
• Online Language Learning Resource Contract 143582 (Ordinance S-47864) on Aug.
25, 2021
Page 318
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.
Page 319
Report
48872)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 143582 with Pronunciator LLC to extend contract term. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $19,500.
Summary
This contract provides Phoenix Public Library access to the eLibrary collection 24
hours-a-day, seven days-a-week. Within this collection, the Vendor provides access to
its web-based language learning resources with 164 languages taught in 146 home
languages and an average of 10,000 instructional phrases per language. This include
both ESL and ASL. In addition to the courses, it also offers feature films with integrated
drills and quizzes, with over 6 million hours of downloadable audio lessons, major label
music with lyrics; City video tours; and a downloadable app for use on mobile devices
by Library customers.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Contract Term
Upon approval of this item, the contract will be extended through Aug. 31, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $19,500 in additional funds, the revised total value of the contract will
not exceed $145,250. Funds are available in the Library Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Online Language Learning Resource Contract 143582 (Ordinance S-42803) on Aug.
31, 2016;
• Online Language Learning Resource Contract 143582 (Ordinance S-47864) on Aug.
25, 2021
Page 318
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.
Page 319
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Clean Public Facility and School Improvement and Upgrades Program Award
Recommendation (Ordinance S-48871)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to use Coronavirus Aid, Relief,
and Economic Security Act Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-CV) and
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding to enter into an agreement with
Washington Elementary School District for an amount not to exceed $4.5 million, and
to take all necessary actions and execute all documents and agreements required by
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Further request to
authorize the City Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item.
Summary
The City of Phoenix received two rounds of CDBG-CV funding to help Phoenix
residents, businesses, and neighborhoods prevent, prepare for, and respond to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Since May 2020, the City Council has authorized the
Neighborhood Services Department (NSD) to implement multiple programs by
allocating the CDBG-CV funds towards support services and shelters for people
experiencing homelessness, COVID-19 relief grant awards to microenterprise
businesses, assistance to local non-profit organizations, and funding Owner Occupied
Rehabilitation shelter-in-place services.
In December 2021, City Council approved allocating $2,307,685 in CDBG-CV funds to
an open application process to fund COVID-19 facility improvements and upgrades.
Eligible projects include facilities open to the public and serving low- and moderate-
income individuals or families. Nonprofit organizations, schools or other public
agencies were all considered eligible applicants.
NSD issued the COVID-19 Clean Public Facility and School Improvement and
Upgrade Notice of Funding Opportunity (NSD-NOFO-22-005) on March 8 seeking
applications from public facilities and schools with proposed projects that address the
effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigate the future spread of COVID-19 and
other infectious diseases. Projects such as heating, ventilation, air conditioning
(HVAC) systems, antimicrobial surfaces, and touchless fixtures for the purposes to
reduce airborne transmission risks to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-
Page 320
19 pandemic were eligible proposals.
NSD staff reviewed applications for eligibility prior to being forwarded to the evaluation
panel. The panel, which was comprised of City staff from multiple departments with
facility project and grant funding expertise, evaluated applications (based on project
description and need, feasibility and timeliness, and project budget) and came to a
consensus on project ranking and award.
The evaluation panel convened on May 25, 2022, and scored the following application
as the highest of the three eligible and responsive submittals:
· Washington Elementary School District’s HVAC system replacement and water
filling station installations project - $4.5 million.
This project includes improvements at four district schools: Palo Verde Middle School,
Ocotillo Elementary School, Roadrunner Elementary School, and Washington
Elementary School.
NSD will exhaust the entire $2,307,685 of CDBG-CV funding allocation for this
program and fund the remaining balance of the project with available prior and current
year CDBG entitlement allocations.
Contract Term
The term for the Washington Elementary School District contract will begin on or about
Aug. 1, 2022, and end on or about Sept. 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
This program is funded by HUD through the CARES Act and the Community
Development Block Grant. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On May 6, 2020, City Council authorized a Substantial Amendment to the 2015-20
Consolidated Plan's 2019-20 Annual Action Plan to include the first release of
allocations and waivers authorized by the CARES Act.
On Jan. 21, 2021, the Land Use and Livability Subcommittee recommended City
Council approval of broad allocations of ESG-CV2 allocations to prevent, prepare for,
and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on individuals and families who are
experiencing homelessness or receiving homeless assistance, and to support
homelessness prevention activities to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19.
Page 321
On Feb. 17, 2021, the City Council authorized a Substantial Amendment to the 2015-
20 Consolidated Plan's 2019-20 Annual Action Plan to include the second release of
allocations and waivers authorized by the CARES Act.
On Nov. 3, 2021, the Community and Cultural Investment Subcommittee
recommended approval of the CARES Act Community Development Block Grant
Reallocation by a 4 to 0 vote.
On Dec. 1, 2021, the City Council authorized an Amendment to the 2015-20
Consolidated Plan's 2019-20 Annual Action Plan to include the CDBG-CV reallocation
and waivers authorized by the CARES Act.
Public Outreach
As part of the CARES Act, HUD approved an expedited public outreach process to
allow flexibility to institute more streamlined requirements to address immediate needs
relative to COVID-19. The HUD abbreviated process includes the following:
· The reduction of a 30-day public comment period and the implementation of a
public comment period of no less than five days in an effort to expedite the
Consolidated Plan Substantial Amendment process and allow the City to respond
as quickly as possible to the immediate needs in the community; and
· The elimination of the in-person public hearings and the implementation of virtual
public hearings when: National and/or local health authorities recommend social
distancing and limiting public gatherings for public health reasons; and virtual
hearings provide reasonable notification and access for citizens in accordance with
Phoenix certifications, timely responses from local officials to all citizen questions
and issues, and public access to all questions and responses.
Location
Washington Elementary School District:
· Palo Verde Middle School, 7502 N. 39th Ave.
· Ocotillo Elementary School, 3225 W. Ocotillo Road
· Roadrunner Elementary School, 7702 N. 39th Ave.
· Washington Elementary School, 8033 N. 27th Ave.
Council Districts: 4 and 5
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.
Page 322
Report
Recommendation (Ordinance S-48871)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to use Coronavirus Aid, Relief,
and Economic Security Act Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-CV) and
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding to enter into an agreement with
Washington Elementary School District for an amount not to exceed $4.5 million, and
to take all necessary actions and execute all documents and agreements required by
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Further request to
authorize the City Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item.
Summary
The City of Phoenix received two rounds of CDBG-CV funding to help Phoenix
residents, businesses, and neighborhoods prevent, prepare for, and respond to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Since May 2020, the City Council has authorized the
Neighborhood Services Department (NSD) to implement multiple programs by
allocating the CDBG-CV funds towards support services and shelters for people
experiencing homelessness, COVID-19 relief grant awards to microenterprise
businesses, assistance to local non-profit organizations, and funding Owner Occupied
Rehabilitation shelter-in-place services.
In December 2021, City Council approved allocating $2,307,685 in CDBG-CV funds to
an open application process to fund COVID-19 facility improvements and upgrades.
Eligible projects include facilities open to the public and serving low- and moderate-
income individuals or families. Nonprofit organizations, schools or other public
agencies were all considered eligible applicants.
NSD issued the COVID-19 Clean Public Facility and School Improvement and
Upgrade Notice of Funding Opportunity (NSD-NOFO-22-005) on March 8 seeking
applications from public facilities and schools with proposed projects that address the
effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigate the future spread of COVID-19 and
other infectious diseases. Projects such as heating, ventilation, air conditioning
(HVAC) systems, antimicrobial surfaces, and touchless fixtures for the purposes to
reduce airborne transmission risks to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-
Page 320
19 pandemic were eligible proposals.
NSD staff reviewed applications for eligibility prior to being forwarded to the evaluation
panel. The panel, which was comprised of City staff from multiple departments with
facility project and grant funding expertise, evaluated applications (based on project
description and need, feasibility and timeliness, and project budget) and came to a
consensus on project ranking and award.
The evaluation panel convened on May 25, 2022, and scored the following application
as the highest of the three eligible and responsive submittals:
· Washington Elementary School District’s HVAC system replacement and water
filling station installations project - $4.5 million.
This project includes improvements at four district schools: Palo Verde Middle School,
Ocotillo Elementary School, Roadrunner Elementary School, and Washington
Elementary School.
NSD will exhaust the entire $2,307,685 of CDBG-CV funding allocation for this
program and fund the remaining balance of the project with available prior and current
year CDBG entitlement allocations.
Contract Term
The term for the Washington Elementary School District contract will begin on or about
Aug. 1, 2022, and end on or about Sept. 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
This program is funded by HUD through the CARES Act and the Community
Development Block Grant. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On May 6, 2020, City Council authorized a Substantial Amendment to the 2015-20
Consolidated Plan's 2019-20 Annual Action Plan to include the first release of
allocations and waivers authorized by the CARES Act.
On Jan. 21, 2021, the Land Use and Livability Subcommittee recommended City
Council approval of broad allocations of ESG-CV2 allocations to prevent, prepare for,
and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on individuals and families who are
experiencing homelessness or receiving homeless assistance, and to support
homelessness prevention activities to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19.
Page 321
On Feb. 17, 2021, the City Council authorized a Substantial Amendment to the 2015-
20 Consolidated Plan's 2019-20 Annual Action Plan to include the second release of
allocations and waivers authorized by the CARES Act.
On Nov. 3, 2021, the Community and Cultural Investment Subcommittee
recommended approval of the CARES Act Community Development Block Grant
Reallocation by a 4 to 0 vote.
On Dec. 1, 2021, the City Council authorized an Amendment to the 2015-20
Consolidated Plan's 2019-20 Annual Action Plan to include the CDBG-CV reallocation
and waivers authorized by the CARES Act.
Public Outreach
As part of the CARES Act, HUD approved an expedited public outreach process to
allow flexibility to institute more streamlined requirements to address immediate needs
relative to COVID-19. The HUD abbreviated process includes the following:
· The reduction of a 30-day public comment period and the implementation of a
public comment period of no less than five days in an effort to expedite the
Consolidated Plan Substantial Amendment process and allow the City to respond
as quickly as possible to the immediate needs in the community; and
· The elimination of the in-person public hearings and the implementation of virtual
public hearings when: National and/or local health authorities recommend social
distancing and limiting public gatherings for public health reasons; and virtual
hearings provide reasonable notification and access for citizens in accordance with
Phoenix certifications, timely responses from local officials to all citizen questions
and issues, and public access to all questions and responses.
Location
Washington Elementary School District:
· Palo Verde Middle School, 7502 N. 39th Ave.
· Ocotillo Elementary School, 3225 W. Ocotillo Road
· Roadrunner Elementary School, 7702 N. 39th Ave.
· Washington Elementary School, 8033 N. 27th Ave.
Council Districts: 4 and 5
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.
Page 322
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Community Arts Support Grant Allocations (Ordinance S-
48860)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all necessary
agreements between the Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture (POAC) and approved
applicants for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 General Support Program and Project Support
Program grants in an aggregate amount of $1,281,946. Further request authorization
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
POAC has administered the Community Arts Grants Program. The program includes
four tiers of core operating support grants called General Support Program (GSP)
grants, and Project Support Program (PSP) grants for artistic and cultural projects that
engage Phoenix residents.
To be eligible for GSP, an organization must be a registered non-profit arts or cultural
organization with a tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Code/small arts or cultural LLC (non-single member) and must provide an arts or
cultural service to Phoenix residents within CIty of Phoenix boundaries. For PSP
grants, an applicant can be a non-profit organization with a tax-exempt status under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, small arts or cultural LLC (non-single
member, public school, neighborhood group, or other arts collective/group using a
nonprofit fiscal sponsor. This policy allows POAC to broaden the reach of the grant
program to small, emerging arts and cultural organizations and, through the fiscal
agent partnership, establish relationships between large and small organizations in the
hope that traditional partnering opportunities and resources sharing may develop.
All grant applications for the Community Arts Grants Program were due to POAC on
April 4, 2022. By the deadline, 110 were received, and exactly 100 applications were
eligible for support and were reviewed by community panels made up of laypersons,
artists, arts professionals, and educators to ensure a through and unbiased review.
Through the agency's equity strategy, POAC ensures outreach to all areas of the city
and targets applicants from all disciplines, budget sizes, underrepresented
populations, and City Council districts. We are happy to report there was a 11 percent
Page 323
increase in applications from FY 2022 to FY 2023.
Funding allocations totaling $1,231,900 are requested for 98 applicants funded
through the GSP and PSP grant categories (Attachment A). This total is made up of
$1,150,300 in General Fund support and $81,600 in funding from remaining Nonprofit
Arts and Cultural Stabilization Grants funds paid by the American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA). In addition, POAC will launch a second PSP cycle to artists and arts and
culture organizations to present programming at city-run facilities to ensure greater
equitable geographic distribution of grant funding. This second PSP round will have a
budget of $50,046 making an aggregate amount of $1,281,946.
General Support Program (GSP) grants strengthen the community's access to arts
and culture programming. The program provides core operating support to arts and
cultural organizations of all sizes that have a primary mission to create, produce, or
provide arts and cultural programming to enhance the quality of lives for Phoenix
residents. GSP grant allocations are determined by the ranking an applicant received
during the panel review of the following criteria:
1. Artistic/Cultural Value
2. Community Significance
3. Financial and Leadership Capacity
General Support Program Tiers and Allocations breakdown:
In GSP Level I, organizations must have a prior year income of at least $2.5 million.
Thirteen organizations are recommended for funding totaling $445,000, with each
receiving grant awards between $24,000 and $45,000.
In GSP Level II, organizations must have a prior year income between $400,000 and
$2,499,999. There are 20 organizations recommended for funding totaling $312,250,
with each receiving grant awards between $7,000 and $20,000.
In GSP Level III organizations must have a prior year income between $100,000 and
$399,999. There are 20 organizations recommended for funding totaling $243,000,
with each receiving grant awards between $5,000 and $14,000.
In GSP Level IV organizations must have a prior year income between $5,000 and
$99,999. There are 20 organizations recommended for funding totaling $152,000, with
each receiving grant awards between $3,000 and $10,000.
Project Support Program (PSP) grants promote and encourage the breadth of arts
and cultural programming in our community by supporting projects both large and
Page 324
small throughout the City of Phoenix.
The program supports guest artist fees/expenses, production fees, and marketing
expenses for in-person, socially distanced, and/or virtual projects that engage Phoenix
residents, including but not limited to, arts workshops, popup performances, and
collaborations with artists. PSP applicants are eligible to receive an amount up to
$3,000 to fund their proposed project. Allocations are determined by the ranking an
applicant received during the panel review of the following criteria:
1. Artistic/Cultural Value
2. Community Significance
3. Logistics and Accessibility
Twenty-four organizations are recommended for PSP funding totaling $68,440.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Arts and Culture Commission reviewed and approved the FY 2022-23
Community Arts Grants Program allocation recommendations at its meeting on June
14, 2022.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Phoenix Office
of Arts and Culture.
Page 325
ATTACHMENT A
Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture Community Arts Grants FY23 Funding Recommendations
Category Grantee Amount
General Support I Arizona Opera Company $35,000
General Support I Arizona Science Center $31,000
General Support I Arizona Theatre Company $31,000
General Support I Ballet Arizona $45,000
General Support I Childrens Museum of Phoenix $28,000
General Support I Desert Botanical Garden $40,000
General Support I Free Arts for Abused Children of Arizona $35,000
General Support I Heard Museum $35,000
General Support I Musical Instrument Museum $35,000
General Support I Phoenix Art Museum $40,000
General Support I Phoenix Symphony $35,000
General Support I Phoenix Theatre $41,000
General Support I Arizona Center for Nature Conservation (Phoenix Zoo) $24,000
General Support II Act One $18,750
General Support II Arizona Jewish Historical Society $18,000
General Support II Black Theatre Troupe $15,000
General Support II CALA Alliance $14,500
General Support II Childsplay $15,500
General Support II Cihuapactli Collective $15,500
General Support II Phoenix Performing Arts Center (Herberger Theater Center) $14,500
General Support II Irish Cultural and Learning Foundation $7,000
General Support II Japanese Friendship Garden of Phoenix $14,000
General Support II Jazz in Arizona $14,000
General Support II Musical Theatre of Anthem $16,000
General Support II Phoenix Boys Choir $18,750
General Support II Central Arts Alliance (Phoenix Center for the Arts) $17,250
General Support II Phoenix Chamber Music Society $14,000
General Support II Phoenix Childrens Chorus $19,250
General Support II Phoenix Conservatory of Music $15,500
General Support II Rosies House a Music Academy for Children $20,000
General Support II Shemer Art Center and Museum Association Inc Shemer $15,000
General Support II Valley Youth Theatre $14,000
General Support II Xico $16,750
General Support III Almost Famous Theatre Company $10,000
General Support III Cultural Coalition $12,750
General Support III Great Arizona Puppet Theater $12,750
General Support III Harmony Project Phoenix $12,750
General Support III Heritage Square Foundation $12,750
General Support III Kids In Focus $12,750
General Support III Orpheus Male Chorus of Phoenix $12,000
General Support III Palabras Bilingual Bookstore $5,000
General Support III Phoenix Film Foundation $12,250
General Support III Phoenix Girls Chorus $13,000
General Support III Phoenix Youth Symphony Orchestras $11,750
Page 326
ATTACHMENT A
Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture Community Arts Grants FY23 Funding Recommendations
General Support III Phonetic Spit $14,000
General Support III Red Rocks Music Festival $12,500
General Support III Reframe Youth Arts Center $13,500
General Support III Rising Youth Theatre $12,750
General Support III Roosevelt Row Community Development Corporation $11,000
General Support III Sounds Academy $13,250
General Support III Spotlight Youth Theatre $11,250
General Support III The Phoenix Chorale $13,000
General Support III Young Arts Arizona $14,000
General Support IV Advocates for Latino Arts & Culture Consortium $5,000
General Support IV Alwun House Foundation $6,500
General Support IV Arizona Aikido $5,500
General Support IV Arizona Masterworks Chorale $7,750
General Support IV Desert Overture Live Cultural Entertainment $6,500
General Support IV Downtown Chamber Series $9,500
General Support IV Grassrootz Bookstore $9,500
General Support IV Grey Box Collective $10,000
General Support IV Heartsy $10,000
General Support IV Helios: a modern renaissance $3,000
General Support IV iTheatre Collaborative $5,500
General Support IV Musica Nova $6,750
General Support IV North Valley Symphony Orchestra Inc $7,750
General Support IV Phoenix Institute of Contemporary Art $8,750
General Support IV Phoenix Womens Chorus $6,500
General Support IV Scorpius Dance Theatre $6,000
General Support IV Teatro Bravo $3,000
General Support IV Teatro Meshico $6,500
General Support IV The Sagrado $8,750
General Support IV Wasted Ink Zine Distro $10,000
General Support IV Yes and Productions $9,500
Project Support African Association of Arizona $3,000
Project Support Arab American Festival $2,850
Project Support Arizona LGBT+ History Project $2,550
Project Support Arizona Matsuri $2,850
Project Support Balkan Community Culture and Heritage Organization $2,850
Project Support Convergence Ballet Company $3,000
Project Support Cultural Arts Coalition Celebrating Global Connections $3,000
Project Support Familias Consulting $2,850
Project Support FEXAM Media $2,700
Project Support Fuerte Art Collective $2,700
Project Support Furious Styles Crew $2,700
Project Support Genesis Program $3,000
Project Support Hatcher Road Business Alliance $2,550
Project Support In The Q Records $3,000
Project Support Indige Design Collab $2,850
Page 327
ATTACHMENT A
Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture Community Arts Grants FY23 Funding Recommendations
Project Support Latina Dance Project $2,850
Project Support Movement Source $3,000
Project Support NUEBOX $2,850
Project Support Owlsong Productions $3,000
Project Support Phoenix Chinese Week $2,850
Project Support Phoenix Youth Circus Arts $3,000
Project Support Playback Theatre of Arizona $3,000
Project Support Skyes the Limit Foundation $2,850
Project Support The Sacred G's $2,550
TOTAL $1,231,900
Page 328
Report
48860)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all necessary
agreements between the Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture (POAC) and approved
applicants for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 General Support Program and Project Support
Program grants in an aggregate amount of $1,281,946. Further request authorization
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
POAC has administered the Community Arts Grants Program. The program includes
four tiers of core operating support grants called General Support Program (GSP)
grants, and Project Support Program (PSP) grants for artistic and cultural projects that
engage Phoenix residents.
To be eligible for GSP, an organization must be a registered non-profit arts or cultural
organization with a tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Code/small arts or cultural LLC (non-single member) and must provide an arts or
cultural service to Phoenix residents within CIty of Phoenix boundaries. For PSP
grants, an applicant can be a non-profit organization with a tax-exempt status under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, small arts or cultural LLC (non-single
member, public school, neighborhood group, or other arts collective/group using a
nonprofit fiscal sponsor. This policy allows POAC to broaden the reach of the grant
program to small, emerging arts and cultural organizations and, through the fiscal
agent partnership, establish relationships between large and small organizations in the
hope that traditional partnering opportunities and resources sharing may develop.
All grant applications for the Community Arts Grants Program were due to POAC on
April 4, 2022. By the deadline, 110 were received, and exactly 100 applications were
eligible for support and were reviewed by community panels made up of laypersons,
artists, arts professionals, and educators to ensure a through and unbiased review.
Through the agency's equity strategy, POAC ensures outreach to all areas of the city
and targets applicants from all disciplines, budget sizes, underrepresented
populations, and City Council districts. We are happy to report there was a 11 percent
Page 323
increase in applications from FY 2022 to FY 2023.
Funding allocations totaling $1,231,900 are requested for 98 applicants funded
through the GSP and PSP grant categories (Attachment A). This total is made up of
$1,150,300 in General Fund support and $81,600 in funding from remaining Nonprofit
Arts and Cultural Stabilization Grants funds paid by the American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA). In addition, POAC will launch a second PSP cycle to artists and arts and
culture organizations to present programming at city-run facilities to ensure greater
equitable geographic distribution of grant funding. This second PSP round will have a
budget of $50,046 making an aggregate amount of $1,281,946.
General Support Program (GSP) grants strengthen the community's access to arts
and culture programming. The program provides core operating support to arts and
cultural organizations of all sizes that have a primary mission to create, produce, or
provide arts and cultural programming to enhance the quality of lives for Phoenix
residents. GSP grant allocations are determined by the ranking an applicant received
during the panel review of the following criteria:
1. Artistic/Cultural Value
2. Community Significance
3. Financial and Leadership Capacity
General Support Program Tiers and Allocations breakdown:
In GSP Level I, organizations must have a prior year income of at least $2.5 million.
Thirteen organizations are recommended for funding totaling $445,000, with each
receiving grant awards between $24,000 and $45,000.
In GSP Level II, organizations must have a prior year income between $400,000 and
$2,499,999. There are 20 organizations recommended for funding totaling $312,250,
with each receiving grant awards between $7,000 and $20,000.
In GSP Level III organizations must have a prior year income between $100,000 and
$399,999. There are 20 organizations recommended for funding totaling $243,000,
with each receiving grant awards between $5,000 and $14,000.
In GSP Level IV organizations must have a prior year income between $5,000 and
$99,999. There are 20 organizations recommended for funding totaling $152,000, with
each receiving grant awards between $3,000 and $10,000.
Project Support Program (PSP) grants promote and encourage the breadth of arts
and cultural programming in our community by supporting projects both large and
Page 324
small throughout the City of Phoenix.
The program supports guest artist fees/expenses, production fees, and marketing
expenses for in-person, socially distanced, and/or virtual projects that engage Phoenix
residents, including but not limited to, arts workshops, popup performances, and
collaborations with artists. PSP applicants are eligible to receive an amount up to
$3,000 to fund their proposed project. Allocations are determined by the ranking an
applicant received during the panel review of the following criteria:
1. Artistic/Cultural Value
2. Community Significance
3. Logistics and Accessibility
Twenty-four organizations are recommended for PSP funding totaling $68,440.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Arts and Culture Commission reviewed and approved the FY 2022-23
Community Arts Grants Program allocation recommendations at its meeting on June
14, 2022.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Phoenix Office
of Arts and Culture.
Page 325
ATTACHMENT A
Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture Community Arts Grants FY23 Funding Recommendations
Category Grantee Amount
General Support I Arizona Opera Company $35,000
General Support I Arizona Science Center $31,000
General Support I Arizona Theatre Company $31,000
General Support I Ballet Arizona $45,000
General Support I Childrens Museum of Phoenix $28,000
General Support I Desert Botanical Garden $40,000
General Support I Free Arts for Abused Children of Arizona $35,000
General Support I Heard Museum $35,000
General Support I Musical Instrument Museum $35,000
General Support I Phoenix Art Museum $40,000
General Support I Phoenix Symphony $35,000
General Support I Phoenix Theatre $41,000
General Support I Arizona Center for Nature Conservation (Phoenix Zoo) $24,000
General Support II Act One $18,750
General Support II Arizona Jewish Historical Society $18,000
General Support II Black Theatre Troupe $15,000
General Support II CALA Alliance $14,500
General Support II Childsplay $15,500
General Support II Cihuapactli Collective $15,500
General Support II Phoenix Performing Arts Center (Herberger Theater Center) $14,500
General Support II Irish Cultural and Learning Foundation $7,000
General Support II Japanese Friendship Garden of Phoenix $14,000
General Support II Jazz in Arizona $14,000
General Support II Musical Theatre of Anthem $16,000
General Support II Phoenix Boys Choir $18,750
General Support II Central Arts Alliance (Phoenix Center for the Arts) $17,250
General Support II Phoenix Chamber Music Society $14,000
General Support II Phoenix Childrens Chorus $19,250
General Support II Phoenix Conservatory of Music $15,500
General Support II Rosies House a Music Academy for Children $20,000
General Support II Shemer Art Center and Museum Association Inc Shemer $15,000
General Support II Valley Youth Theatre $14,000
General Support II Xico $16,750
General Support III Almost Famous Theatre Company $10,000
General Support III Cultural Coalition $12,750
General Support III Great Arizona Puppet Theater $12,750
General Support III Harmony Project Phoenix $12,750
General Support III Heritage Square Foundation $12,750
General Support III Kids In Focus $12,750
General Support III Orpheus Male Chorus of Phoenix $12,000
General Support III Palabras Bilingual Bookstore $5,000
General Support III Phoenix Film Foundation $12,250
General Support III Phoenix Girls Chorus $13,000
General Support III Phoenix Youth Symphony Orchestras $11,750
Page 326
ATTACHMENT A
Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture Community Arts Grants FY23 Funding Recommendations
General Support III Phonetic Spit $14,000
General Support III Red Rocks Music Festival $12,500
General Support III Reframe Youth Arts Center $13,500
General Support III Rising Youth Theatre $12,750
General Support III Roosevelt Row Community Development Corporation $11,000
General Support III Sounds Academy $13,250
General Support III Spotlight Youth Theatre $11,250
General Support III The Phoenix Chorale $13,000
General Support III Young Arts Arizona $14,000
General Support IV Advocates for Latino Arts & Culture Consortium $5,000
General Support IV Alwun House Foundation $6,500
General Support IV Arizona Aikido $5,500
General Support IV Arizona Masterworks Chorale $7,750
General Support IV Desert Overture Live Cultural Entertainment $6,500
General Support IV Downtown Chamber Series $9,500
General Support IV Grassrootz Bookstore $9,500
General Support IV Grey Box Collective $10,000
General Support IV Heartsy $10,000
General Support IV Helios: a modern renaissance $3,000
General Support IV iTheatre Collaborative $5,500
General Support IV Musica Nova $6,750
General Support IV North Valley Symphony Orchestra Inc $7,750
General Support IV Phoenix Institute of Contemporary Art $8,750
General Support IV Phoenix Womens Chorus $6,500
General Support IV Scorpius Dance Theatre $6,000
General Support IV Teatro Bravo $3,000
General Support IV Teatro Meshico $6,500
General Support IV The Sagrado $8,750
General Support IV Wasted Ink Zine Distro $10,000
General Support IV Yes and Productions $9,500
Project Support African Association of Arizona $3,000
Project Support Arab American Festival $2,850
Project Support Arizona LGBT+ History Project $2,550
Project Support Arizona Matsuri $2,850
Project Support Balkan Community Culture and Heritage Organization $2,850
Project Support Convergence Ballet Company $3,000
Project Support Cultural Arts Coalition Celebrating Global Connections $3,000
Project Support Familias Consulting $2,850
Project Support FEXAM Media $2,700
Project Support Fuerte Art Collective $2,700
Project Support Furious Styles Crew $2,700
Project Support Genesis Program $3,000
Project Support Hatcher Road Business Alliance $2,550
Project Support In The Q Records $3,000
Project Support Indige Design Collab $2,850
Page 327
ATTACHMENT A
Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture Community Arts Grants FY23 Funding Recommendations
Project Support Latina Dance Project $2,850
Project Support Movement Source $3,000
Project Support NUEBOX $2,850
Project Support Owlsong Productions $3,000
Project Support Phoenix Chinese Week $2,850
Project Support Phoenix Youth Circus Arts $3,000
Project Support Playback Theatre of Arizona $3,000
Project Support Skyes the Limit Foundation $2,850
Project Support The Sacred G's $2,550
TOTAL $1,231,900
Page 328
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Artist Design Contract for Perry Park Public Art Project (Ordinance S-48890)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Arizona artist Lisa Bernal Brethour, or her City-approved designee, for an amount not
to exceed $65,000 to design public art for the Perry Park Public Art Project located at
2700 N. 32nd Street in Phoenix. Under this contract, the artist will also oversee the
construction of public enhancements at the site. Further request authorization for the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
The Fiscal Year 2022-27 Public Art Plan includes a project to work with the community,
Parks and Recreation and Water Services departments to commission an artist to work
with the community and the Parks Department to enhance the design of the
improvements at Perry Park.
On May 25, 2022, a four-person artist selection panel reviewed a pool of 45 applicants
who had responded to the project's Request for Qualifications. Ms. Brethour was
recommended based on her quality of past work, her demonstrated ability to involve
the community in meaningful ways, and her potential to create a site-specific concept
for this community.
The selection panel included Danielle Poveromo, City of Phoenix Parks Northeast
Division Deputy Director; Wendy Raisenen, Scottsdale Public Art Curator of
Collections and Exhibitions; Ryan Lay, Professional Skateboarder and Executive
Director at Skate After School; Kelly Pajek, Public Art Director, 4Culture Seattle.
Financial Impact
The Perry Park Public Art Project is one of 39 projects in the Fiscal Year 2022-27
Public Art Plan that City Council approved on June 15, 2022. The Public Art Plan
includes $722,853 for this project. The proposed $65,000 design contract will cover all
costs to the artist's work with City staff, Project Engineering and Design Consultants,
and the Office of Arts and Culture to produce a complete and buildable design. It will
also include any additional work to engage the community during the design phase of
the project. The percent-for-art funds for this project come from Water Services
departments Capital Improvement Program.
Page 329
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Arts and Culture Commission reviewed and recommended approval of
this item at its June 14, 2022, meeting.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Office of Arts
and Culture.
Page 330
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Arizona artist Lisa Bernal Brethour, or her City-approved designee, for an amount not
to exceed $65,000 to design public art for the Perry Park Public Art Project located at
2700 N. 32nd Street in Phoenix. Under this contract, the artist will also oversee the
construction of public enhancements at the site. Further request authorization for the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
The Fiscal Year 2022-27 Public Art Plan includes a project to work with the community,
Parks and Recreation and Water Services departments to commission an artist to work
with the community and the Parks Department to enhance the design of the
improvements at Perry Park.
On May 25, 2022, a four-person artist selection panel reviewed a pool of 45 applicants
who had responded to the project's Request for Qualifications. Ms. Brethour was
recommended based on her quality of past work, her demonstrated ability to involve
the community in meaningful ways, and her potential to create a site-specific concept
for this community.
The selection panel included Danielle Poveromo, City of Phoenix Parks Northeast
Division Deputy Director; Wendy Raisenen, Scottsdale Public Art Curator of
Collections and Exhibitions; Ryan Lay, Professional Skateboarder and Executive
Director at Skate After School; Kelly Pajek, Public Art Director, 4Culture Seattle.
Financial Impact
The Perry Park Public Art Project is one of 39 projects in the Fiscal Year 2022-27
Public Art Plan that City Council approved on June 15, 2022. The Public Art Plan
includes $722,853 for this project. The proposed $65,000 design contract will cover all
costs to the artist's work with City staff, Project Engineering and Design Consultants,
and the Office of Arts and Culture to produce a complete and buildable design. It will
also include any additional work to engage the community during the design phase of
the project. The percent-for-art funds for this project come from Water Services
departments Capital Improvement Program.
Page 329
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Arts and Culture Commission reviewed and recommended approval of
this item at its June 14, 2022, meeting.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Office of Arts
and Culture.
Page 330
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Phoenix Mobile Career Unit Purchase from Farber Specialty Vehicles (Ordinance
S-48838)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to contract with Farber
Specialty Vehicles to purchase a custom Ford Freightliner FSV Coach Style
recreational vehicle and maintenance warranty to be used as the Phoenix Mobile
Career Unit. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse funds related
to this item. Funding is available from the Bloomberg Philanthropies Funds awarded to
the City by Bloomberg Philanthropies as part of the 2021-22 Global Mayors Challenge.
The total value will not exceed $600,000.
Summary
The Global Mayors Challenge is an innovation competition designed to spark
innovative, replicable ideas that will help cities confront challenges. In collaboration
with job seekers and hiring employees, the City developed the Mobile Career Unit
(MCU) initiative to help hiring companies connect with the Phoenix workforce,
including those with barriers to employment. Companies in Phoenix have expressed
difficulty in identifying and recruiting individuals to fill open positions and individuals
seeking employment have expressed difficulty in connecting with employers. The MCU
is a mobile unit that can be dispatched anywhere in the City and is available to assist
residents facing challenges when seeking employment and to provide them with
opportunities to connect with employers in their individual neighborhoods. The MCU
will also provide access to employment and supportive services through partnerships
with community-serving organizations and programs. The MCU assists Phoenix
businesses in connecting with the Phoenix workforce by supporting recruiting efforts.
The unit will have individual workstations, including ADA-compliant stations, that can
be used by job seekers to create resumes, apply for jobs, and conduct virtual
interviews, helping job seekers and employers connect. The MCU will offer multi-
lingual support.
Phoenix was one of only 15 winning cities (out of 631 applicant cities from around the
world) to receive $1 million to implement our innovative idea.
Procurement Information
In compliance with A.R. 3.10, a Special Circumstances Alternative Competition
Page 331
Determination was approved to purchase the vehicle from Farber Specialty Vehicles.
Contract Term
If approved, the four-year contract term will begin on or around Aug. 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
The total contract value will not exceed $600,000.
Funding is available through the Bloomberg Philanthropies Grant. The General Fund
will not be impacted by this action.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council authorized an application for the Bloomberg Philanthropies 2021
Global Mayors Challenge on March 17, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Karen Peters,
and the Community and Economic Development Department and the Office of
Innovation.
Page 332
Report
S-48838)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to contract with Farber
Specialty Vehicles to purchase a custom Ford Freightliner FSV Coach Style
recreational vehicle and maintenance warranty to be used as the Phoenix Mobile
Career Unit. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse funds related
to this item. Funding is available from the Bloomberg Philanthropies Funds awarded to
the City by Bloomberg Philanthropies as part of the 2021-22 Global Mayors Challenge.
The total value will not exceed $600,000.
Summary
The Global Mayors Challenge is an innovation competition designed to spark
innovative, replicable ideas that will help cities confront challenges. In collaboration
with job seekers and hiring employees, the City developed the Mobile Career Unit
(MCU) initiative to help hiring companies connect with the Phoenix workforce,
including those with barriers to employment. Companies in Phoenix have expressed
difficulty in identifying and recruiting individuals to fill open positions and individuals
seeking employment have expressed difficulty in connecting with employers. The MCU
is a mobile unit that can be dispatched anywhere in the City and is available to assist
residents facing challenges when seeking employment and to provide them with
opportunities to connect with employers in their individual neighborhoods. The MCU
will also provide access to employment and supportive services through partnerships
with community-serving organizations and programs. The MCU assists Phoenix
businesses in connecting with the Phoenix workforce by supporting recruiting efforts.
The unit will have individual workstations, including ADA-compliant stations, that can
be used by job seekers to create resumes, apply for jobs, and conduct virtual
interviews, helping job seekers and employers connect. The MCU will offer multi-
lingual support.
Phoenix was one of only 15 winning cities (out of 631 applicant cities from around the
world) to receive $1 million to implement our innovative idea.
Procurement Information
In compliance with A.R. 3.10, a Special Circumstances Alternative Competition
Page 331
Determination was approved to purchase the vehicle from Farber Specialty Vehicles.
Contract Term
If approved, the four-year contract term will begin on or around Aug. 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
The total contract value will not exceed $600,000.
Funding is available through the Bloomberg Philanthropies Grant. The General Fund
will not be impacted by this action.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council authorized an application for the Bloomberg Philanthropies 2021
Global Mayors Challenge on March 17, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Karen Peters,
and the Community and Economic Development Department and the Office of
Innovation.
Page 332
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA) Program -
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Arizona Department of Economic
Security (Ordinance S-48861)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona Department of Economic Security
(ADES) through which the City will provide reemployment services to eligible
individuals and receive cost reimbursement from ADES. There is no impact to the
General Fund as a result of this action. Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept funds and the City Controller to disburse funds related to this item.
Summary
ADES has launched the Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA)
Program to partner with Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Local
Workforce Development Areas (LWDA) to address the individual needs of
Unemployment Insurance (UI) claimants to expedite their return to the workforce. On
behalf of the Phoenix Business and Workforce Development (PBWD) Board, which
oversees the Phoenix LWDA, City Council authorization is requested to contract with
ADES to provide reemployment services to Phoenix job seekers and receive cost
reimbursement from ADES.
The PBWD Board contracts with the Human Services Department (HSD) for adult
workforce development services, which are offered through the City’s three
ARIZONA@WORK Job Centers. If City Council authorizes this request, the PBWD
Board will amend its contract with HSD to include these services, which mirror the
services currently offered.
Through the RESEA Program, ADES staff will identify claimants most likely to exhaust
their UI benefits and refer them to HSD for workforce development services. RESEA
services will be provided to individuals receiving UI benefits to:
· Reduce the UI benefit duration through improved employment outcomes;
· Strengthen UI program integrity and reduce improper UI payments through the
detection and prevention of payments to ineligible individuals;
· Promote alignment with the WIOA vision to increase program integration; and
Page 333
· Establish the RESEA Program and eligibility assessment as an entry point for UI
claimants into other workforce programs.
Reemployment services are designed to help UI claimants be more successful in
returning to work sooner, earning higher wages, and retaining their new jobs. All
services will be provided in a virtual environment utilizing video conferencing software
(example: WebEx, Microsoft Teams) or telephone.
Contract Term
Staff is negotiating the term with ADES. The contract term will be a minimum of six
months and a maximum of three years beginning on or about July 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
No Impact to the General Fund as WIOA Grants will be utilized and reimbursed by the
State. Expenditures are not to exceed $476,193 over the life of the contract.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Community
and Economic Development Department.
Page 334
Report
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Arizona Department of Economic
Security (Ordinance S-48861)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona Department of Economic Security
(ADES) through which the City will provide reemployment services to eligible
individuals and receive cost reimbursement from ADES. There is no impact to the
General Fund as a result of this action. Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept funds and the City Controller to disburse funds related to this item.
Summary
ADES has launched the Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessment (RESEA)
Program to partner with Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Local
Workforce Development Areas (LWDA) to address the individual needs of
Unemployment Insurance (UI) claimants to expedite their return to the workforce. On
behalf of the Phoenix Business and Workforce Development (PBWD) Board, which
oversees the Phoenix LWDA, City Council authorization is requested to contract with
ADES to provide reemployment services to Phoenix job seekers and receive cost
reimbursement from ADES.
The PBWD Board contracts with the Human Services Department (HSD) for adult
workforce development services, which are offered through the City’s three
ARIZONA@WORK Job Centers. If City Council authorizes this request, the PBWD
Board will amend its contract with HSD to include these services, which mirror the
services currently offered.
Through the RESEA Program, ADES staff will identify claimants most likely to exhaust
their UI benefits and refer them to HSD for workforce development services. RESEA
services will be provided to individuals receiving UI benefits to:
· Reduce the UI benefit duration through improved employment outcomes;
· Strengthen UI program integrity and reduce improper UI payments through the
detection and prevention of payments to ineligible individuals;
· Promote alignment with the WIOA vision to increase program integration; and
Page 333
· Establish the RESEA Program and eligibility assessment as an entry point for UI
claimants into other workforce programs.
Reemployment services are designed to help UI claimants be more successful in
returning to work sooner, earning higher wages, and retaining their new jobs. All
services will be provided in a virtual environment utilizing video conferencing software
(example: WebEx, Microsoft Teams) or telephone.
Contract Term
Staff is negotiating the term with ADES. The contract term will be a minimum of six
months and a maximum of three years beginning on or about July 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
No Impact to the General Fund as WIOA Grants will be utilized and reimbursed by the
State. Expenditures are not to exceed $476,193 over the life of the contract.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Community
and Economic Development Department.
Page 334
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Marketing Services - ADSPO16-145339 - Amendment (Ordinance S-48866)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 149535 with Riester Sonoran, LLC for the purchase of
marketing services for the Community and Economic Development (CED) Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $250,000.
Summary
This contract provides interactive marketing services including website design,
advertising and public relations services for the City. Additional funds are required to
implement a national communications strategy to maximize exposure from the
February 2023 Super Bowl and associated activities in the Phoenix area. Marketing
services required include videos, destination web pages, national media stories and
outreach, as well as print materials to showcase Phoenix as a vibrant, tech-forward
city for executive decision makers and business development. Marketing will
showcase the City's leadership on sustainability, semiconductor and advanced
manufacturing, bioscience and healthcare, and mobility. These materials will also
highlight redevelopment and future development opportunities in areas of the City that
may have been traditionally overlooked. These materials will also highlight Phoenix as
a livable city with a rich diverse culture, strong higher-education opportunities and an
active lifestyle.
Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on March 20, 2024.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $250,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $4,180,960. Funds are available in the CED Department’s
budget within the Downtown Community Reinvestment Fund.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-45442) on March 20, 2019;
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-45967) on Aug. 28, 2019;
Page 335
• Ordinance S-46605 on May 6, 2020;
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-47183) on Dec. 16, 2020;
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-47321 on Feb. 17, 2021;
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-47708) on June 16, 2021;
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-48190) on Dec. 15, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Community
and Economic Development.
Page 336
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 149535 with Riester Sonoran, LLC for the purchase of
marketing services for the Community and Economic Development (CED) Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $250,000.
Summary
This contract provides interactive marketing services including website design,
advertising and public relations services for the City. Additional funds are required to
implement a national communications strategy to maximize exposure from the
February 2023 Super Bowl and associated activities in the Phoenix area. Marketing
services required include videos, destination web pages, national media stories and
outreach, as well as print materials to showcase Phoenix as a vibrant, tech-forward
city for executive decision makers and business development. Marketing will
showcase the City's leadership on sustainability, semiconductor and advanced
manufacturing, bioscience and healthcare, and mobility. These materials will also
highlight redevelopment and future development opportunities in areas of the City that
may have been traditionally overlooked. These materials will also highlight Phoenix as
a livable city with a rich diverse culture, strong higher-education opportunities and an
active lifestyle.
Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on March 20, 2024.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $250,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $4,180,960. Funds are available in the CED Department’s
budget within the Downtown Community Reinvestment Fund.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-45442) on March 20, 2019;
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-45967) on Aug. 28, 2019;
Page 335
• Ordinance S-46605 on May 6, 2020;
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-47183) on Dec. 16, 2020;
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-47321 on Feb. 17, 2021;
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-47708) on June 16, 2021;
• Marketing Services Contract 149535 (Ordinance S-48190) on Dec. 15, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Community
and Economic Development.
Page 336
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Community Wireless Network (Digital Divide Cooperative Network)
Intergovernmental Agreement - Amendment (Ordinance S-48870)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Intergovernmental
Agreement (IGA) 154496 with Phoenix Union High School District, its participating
public elementary feeder schools and Maricopa County Community Colleges District
(the Parties) to add $12 million to continue building the community wireless network,
now known as the Digital Education Connection Canopy (DECC) project. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. There
is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City’s allocation of
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding received from the federal government and
is under the Citywide Wireless Network Project and Partnership with Phoenix Union
program.
Summary
On May 14, 2020, the City Council approved $2 million from the City's allocation of
federal Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) to broaden Citywide Wi-Fi. Shortly thereafter,
a core public and private group came together to discuss long-term solutions for the
digital divide in Phoenix. Members of the core group included the City of Phoenix,
Phoenix College (PC), Phoenix Union High School District (PUHSD), the Greater
Phoenix Economic Council and the Arizona Commerce Authority. This group has been
working together since that time.
The digital divide is defined as the economic, education, and social inequalities
between those who have computers and online access, and those who do not. As
reported at the Oct. 27, 2020 City Council Policy meeting, many areas of the country
have little or no access/connection to the internet, including areas in the City of
Phoenix and throughout Arizona. Even when there is internet availability, economic
barriers prevent many residents from accessing the internet. As the working group
presented to the City Council, the gap in the digital divide has become wider and wider
during the COVID-19 pandemic. Households with internet connection have the
opportunity to continue their children's education at home during times when schools
are closed. Coming out of the pandemic, and as schools are opening again, that gap
remains. Students with connectivity can continue with a robust hybrid learning program
and complete their online homework in their homes, while students without
Page 337
connectivity struggle with completing work assignments and must go to a public
location to access the internet.
On Dec. 16, 2020, the City Council approved the IGA to identify and create digital
divide solutions for underserved areas. Since approval of the initial $2 million, the team
has successfully installed and conducted testing at several beta-sites within the
broader proposed area of service for viability. The beta-test sites included the PC
campus, Maryvale High School, the PUHSD offices, and their respective staff and
students. Data collected during this process gave the partnership positive feedback
and critical data on user experience and overall use of the system. In 2021, the City
Council allocated $10 million of the City's first tranche of ARPA funds to expand the
DECC beyond the beta-site testing, starting with a four-square mile Proof of Concept
(POC) area to connect more than 1,000 students who otherwise would not have
reliable internet access at home. This POC area includes the Cartwright Elementary
and Alhambra School districts, as well as Phoenix College. This area has students and
families, as well as staff, utilizing the DECC for schoolwork and is reporting great
success. Utilizing the $10 million ARPA allocation, the DECC installation is now moving
into other unserved and underserved areas of Phoenix over the summer.
It is important to note the DECC is not meant as a pandemic solution, but rather a long
-term equitable solution for the families of Phoenix. No longer will students in
underserved areas have to wait until they can connect at a library, community center or
some other WiFi location away from home to do their homework. These students will
be able to connect in their homes, without having to leave to find internet connection.
Staff requests to amend the IGA with the Parties to add an additional $12 million in
ARPA funds to expand the digital divide throughout the PUHSD service area.
Contract Term
The IGA term began April 1, 2021, and ends June 30, 2025, with one five-year renewal
option.
Financial Impact
Total funding for the IGA, as amended, will not exceed $24 million. This includes the
initial $2 million allocation of federal CRF, the first ARPA allocation of $10 million, and
this second request for ARPA funding in the amount of $12 million. There is no impact
to the General Fund as this funding is available through the City's allocation of ARPA
funds.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council:
Page 338
· Allocated $2 million from Coronavirus Relief Funds to address the digital divide on
May 14, 2020;
· Approved IGA 154496 (Ordinance S-47201) on Dec. 16, 2020;
· Allocated $10 million in ARPA funds to continue building the community wireless
network project on June 8, 2021;
· Approved amending IGA 154496 (S-47962) on Sept. 15, 2021;
· Allocated $12 million in ARPA funds to further expand the community wireless
network project on June 7, 2022.
Location
Council Districts: 4, 5, 7, and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Inger Erickson
and the Community and Economic Development and Information Technology Services
departments.
Page 339
Report
Intergovernmental Agreement - Amendment (Ordinance S-48870)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Intergovernmental
Agreement (IGA) 154496 with Phoenix Union High School District, its participating
public elementary feeder schools and Maricopa County Community Colleges District
(the Parties) to add $12 million to continue building the community wireless network,
now known as the Digital Education Connection Canopy (DECC) project. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. There
is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City’s allocation of
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding received from the federal government and
is under the Citywide Wireless Network Project and Partnership with Phoenix Union
program.
Summary
On May 14, 2020, the City Council approved $2 million from the City's allocation of
federal Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) to broaden Citywide Wi-Fi. Shortly thereafter,
a core public and private group came together to discuss long-term solutions for the
digital divide in Phoenix. Members of the core group included the City of Phoenix,
Phoenix College (PC), Phoenix Union High School District (PUHSD), the Greater
Phoenix Economic Council and the Arizona Commerce Authority. This group has been
working together since that time.
The digital divide is defined as the economic, education, and social inequalities
between those who have computers and online access, and those who do not. As
reported at the Oct. 27, 2020 City Council Policy meeting, many areas of the country
have little or no access/connection to the internet, including areas in the City of
Phoenix and throughout Arizona. Even when there is internet availability, economic
barriers prevent many residents from accessing the internet. As the working group
presented to the City Council, the gap in the digital divide has become wider and wider
during the COVID-19 pandemic. Households with internet connection have the
opportunity to continue their children's education at home during times when schools
are closed. Coming out of the pandemic, and as schools are opening again, that gap
remains. Students with connectivity can continue with a robust hybrid learning program
and complete their online homework in their homes, while students without
Page 337
connectivity struggle with completing work assignments and must go to a public
location to access the internet.
On Dec. 16, 2020, the City Council approved the IGA to identify and create digital
divide solutions for underserved areas. Since approval of the initial $2 million, the team
has successfully installed and conducted testing at several beta-sites within the
broader proposed area of service for viability. The beta-test sites included the PC
campus, Maryvale High School, the PUHSD offices, and their respective staff and
students. Data collected during this process gave the partnership positive feedback
and critical data on user experience and overall use of the system. In 2021, the City
Council allocated $10 million of the City's first tranche of ARPA funds to expand the
DECC beyond the beta-site testing, starting with a four-square mile Proof of Concept
(POC) area to connect more than 1,000 students who otherwise would not have
reliable internet access at home. This POC area includes the Cartwright Elementary
and Alhambra School districts, as well as Phoenix College. This area has students and
families, as well as staff, utilizing the DECC for schoolwork and is reporting great
success. Utilizing the $10 million ARPA allocation, the DECC installation is now moving
into other unserved and underserved areas of Phoenix over the summer.
It is important to note the DECC is not meant as a pandemic solution, but rather a long
-term equitable solution for the families of Phoenix. No longer will students in
underserved areas have to wait until they can connect at a library, community center or
some other WiFi location away from home to do their homework. These students will
be able to connect in their homes, without having to leave to find internet connection.
Staff requests to amend the IGA with the Parties to add an additional $12 million in
ARPA funds to expand the digital divide throughout the PUHSD service area.
Contract Term
The IGA term began April 1, 2021, and ends June 30, 2025, with one five-year renewal
option.
Financial Impact
Total funding for the IGA, as amended, will not exceed $24 million. This includes the
initial $2 million allocation of federal CRF, the first ARPA allocation of $10 million, and
this second request for ARPA funding in the amount of $12 million. There is no impact
to the General Fund as this funding is available through the City's allocation of ARPA
funds.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council:
Page 338
· Allocated $2 million from Coronavirus Relief Funds to address the digital divide on
May 14, 2020;
· Approved IGA 154496 (Ordinance S-47201) on Dec. 16, 2020;
· Allocated $10 million in ARPA funds to continue building the community wireless
network project on June 8, 2021;
· Approved amending IGA 154496 (S-47962) on Sept. 15, 2021;
· Allocated $12 million in ARPA funds to further expand the community wireless
network project on June 7, 2022.
Location
Council Districts: 4, 5, 7, and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Inger Erickson
and the Community and Economic Development and Information Technology Services
departments.
Page 339
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Residences at Falcon Park
Project), Series 2022 (Resolution 22047)
Requests City Council approval for the issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue
Bonds (Residences at Falcon Park Project), Series 2022 to be issued in one or more
tax-exempt and/or taxable series in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$25,000,000.
Summary
Request City Council adoption of a resolution granting approval of the proceedings
under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, AZ., (the
"Phoenix IDA") has previously resolved to issue up to $25,000,000 of Multifamily
Housing Revenue Bonds (the "Revenue Bonds") for use by Falcon Park, LLC (the
"Borrower"), an Arizona limited liability company, to
a) finance and/or refinance, as applicable, all or a portion of the acquisition,
construction, improvement, equipping, and/or operation of qualified residential rental
housing facility in Phoenix, Arizona, and
b) pay certain costs related to the issuance of the Revenue Bonds.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Revenue Bonds at its
meeting held on June 16, 2022.
Location
The Project is located at or near 1220 N. 34th Ave. in Phoenix, Arizona.
Council District: 4
With the exception of certain housing bonds, the Phoenix IDA can finance projects
located anywhere in Arizona. In addition, the Phoenix IDA may issue bonds to finance
projects outside of Arizona, if the out-of-state project provides a benefit within the
State.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.
Page 340
Report
Project), Series 2022 (Resolution 22047)
Requests City Council approval for the issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue
Bonds (Residences at Falcon Park Project), Series 2022 to be issued in one or more
tax-exempt and/or taxable series in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$25,000,000.
Summary
Request City Council adoption of a resolution granting approval of the proceedings
under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, AZ., (the
"Phoenix IDA") has previously resolved to issue up to $25,000,000 of Multifamily
Housing Revenue Bonds (the "Revenue Bonds") for use by Falcon Park, LLC (the
"Borrower"), an Arizona limited liability company, to
a) finance and/or refinance, as applicable, all or a portion of the acquisition,
construction, improvement, equipping, and/or operation of qualified residential rental
housing facility in Phoenix, Arizona, and
b) pay certain costs related to the issuance of the Revenue Bonds.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Revenue Bonds at its
meeting held on June 16, 2022.
Location
The Project is located at or near 1220 N. 34th Ave. in Phoenix, Arizona.
Council District: 4
With the exception of certain housing bonds, the Phoenix IDA can finance projects
located anywhere in Arizona. In addition, the Phoenix IDA may issue bonds to finance
projects outside of Arizona, if the out-of-state project provides a benefit within the
State.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.
Page 340
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Event Services Contracted Labor - Amendment (Ordinance S-48883)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to authorize additional
expenditures not to exceed $460,000 under Contract 145577 with Nesco Resource
LLC and further request authorization to extend the term of the contract through June
30, 2023 for the continued use of contracted labor supporting the Phoenix Convention
Center, Herberger Theater, Orpheum Theater and Symphony Hall. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $460,000.
Summary
Nesco Resource LLC provides temporary labor to support and supplement the work of
Event Services section staff. Use of temporary labor allows greater efficiency by
scheduling based on event demand and is consistent within the industry. Tasks
include: setting and striking chairs, tables and staging, along with general event
support, such as cleaning restrooms, pre-function areas and event spaces before,
during and after events.
The Phoenix Convention Center Department conducted an Invitation for Bid
procurement process in accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation
3.10. Two vendors were selected for award with a contract start date of July 1, 2022.
Since notification of award, 3H Service Systems Inc. has notified the city of their intent
to cancel the contract. Multiple vendors are needed to provide the full range of
services needed.
The current contract with Nesco Resource LLC expires on June 30, 2022. The
extension and additional funds will allow time for a new procurement process to be
completed.
Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $460,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $3,260,000. Funds are available in the Phoenix Convention
Page 341
Center Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Location
Phoenix Convention center
100 N. 3rd St.
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Symphony Hall
75 N. 2nd St.
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Herberger Theater
222 E. Monroe St.
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Orpheum Theater
203 W. Adams St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Council Districts: 7 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.
Page 342
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to authorize additional
expenditures not to exceed $460,000 under Contract 145577 with Nesco Resource
LLC and further request authorization to extend the term of the contract through June
30, 2023 for the continued use of contracted labor supporting the Phoenix Convention
Center, Herberger Theater, Orpheum Theater and Symphony Hall. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $460,000.
Summary
Nesco Resource LLC provides temporary labor to support and supplement the work of
Event Services section staff. Use of temporary labor allows greater efficiency by
scheduling based on event demand and is consistent within the industry. Tasks
include: setting and striking chairs, tables and staging, along with general event
support, such as cleaning restrooms, pre-function areas and event spaces before,
during and after events.
The Phoenix Convention Center Department conducted an Invitation for Bid
procurement process in accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation
3.10. Two vendors were selected for award with a contract start date of July 1, 2022.
Since notification of award, 3H Service Systems Inc. has notified the city of their intent
to cancel the contract. Multiple vendors are needed to provide the full range of
services needed.
The current contract with Nesco Resource LLC expires on June 30, 2022. The
extension and additional funds will allow time for a new procurement process to be
completed.
Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $460,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $3,260,000. Funds are available in the Phoenix Convention
Page 341
Center Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Location
Phoenix Convention center
100 N. 3rd St.
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Symphony Hall
75 N. 2nd St.
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Herberger Theater
222 E. Monroe St.
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Orpheum Theater
203 W. Adams St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Council Districts: 7 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.
Page 342
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amending Chapter 2, Article XXVI, Phoenix City Code, Relating to Phoenix Youth
and Education Commission (Ordinance G-6996)
An ordinance amending Phoenix City Code, Chapter 2, Article XXVI (sections 2-280
through 2-823), Phoenix Youth and Education Commission, to incorporate updates on
member appointments, quorum requirements, term length, and term limits and to
remove the Commission's governance responsibility for the City's educational access
channel, which is no longer operational.
Summary
Proposed changes detailed in the draft ordinance (Attachment A) include:
· Removing the Commission's governance responsibility for the City's educational
access channel, which is no longer operational.
· Providing additional clarification on definitions.
· Updating quorum requirements, member appointments, and term length and limits
for clarity and consistency and to facilitate the Commission's timely and effective
functioning.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Youth and
Education Office.
Page 343
Report
and Education Commission (Ordinance G-6996)
An ordinance amending Phoenix City Code, Chapter 2, Article XXVI (sections 2-280
through 2-823), Phoenix Youth and Education Commission, to incorporate updates on
member appointments, quorum requirements, term length, and term limits and to
remove the Commission's governance responsibility for the City's educational access
channel, which is no longer operational.
Summary
Proposed changes detailed in the draft ordinance (Attachment A) include:
· Removing the Commission's governance responsibility for the City's educational
access channel, which is no longer operational.
· Providing additional clarification on definitions.
· Updating quorum requirements, member appointments, and term length and limits
for clarity and consistency and to facilitate the Commission's timely and effective
functioning.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Youth and
Education Office.
Page 343
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
AARP Foundation Program Agreement for Experience Corps Phoenix Tutoring
(Ordinance S-48885)
Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a program
partnership agreement with the AARP Foundation for the Experience Corps Phoenix
Tutoring Program and to approve the inclusion of the AARP Foundation as additional
insured on the City's self-insurance plan pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-20.
Summary
During the pandemic, the percentage of Phoenix students passing the third grade
reading assessment declined to 25 percent - the lowest score in seven years.
Approximately 13,000 Phoenix third graders are not reading at grade level. The
pandemic has led to a “COVID-19 slide” learning loss, further widening the gap
between student achievement and grade level standards in literacy and math,
particularly in low-income communities.
To address this gap, the city implements AARP Experience Corps, a nationally
recognized volunteer tutoring program, that engages older adults to provide one-on-
one tutoring interventions in Phoenix schools to improve K-3 student literacy. The
program is an approved evidence-based intervention that improves student
achievement under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). The program targets Title
1 Phoenix schools with high percentages of students who are not reading at grade
level.
The program is part of Read On Phoenix, an initiative to get local students reading at
grade level by 3rd grade. In 2020, the Campaign for Grade-Level Reading (CGLR)
recognized the City as a “Bright Spot Community” for mitigating learning loss by
closing the digital gap; building educator capacity through professional development in
literacy; and expanding evidence-based literacy strategies to meet community needs
during the pandemic. The City was also recognized in 2016 and 2017 as a
“Pacesetter” community for ensuring academic success through literacy enrichment
programs.
Contract Term
The approved program agreement term is July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2024, with
Page 344
no options to extend.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the city.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Youth and
Education Office.
Page 345
Report
(Ordinance S-48885)
Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a program
partnership agreement with the AARP Foundation for the Experience Corps Phoenix
Tutoring Program and to approve the inclusion of the AARP Foundation as additional
insured on the City's self-insurance plan pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-20.
Summary
During the pandemic, the percentage of Phoenix students passing the third grade
reading assessment declined to 25 percent - the lowest score in seven years.
Approximately 13,000 Phoenix third graders are not reading at grade level. The
pandemic has led to a “COVID-19 slide” learning loss, further widening the gap
between student achievement and grade level standards in literacy and math,
particularly in low-income communities.
To address this gap, the city implements AARP Experience Corps, a nationally
recognized volunteer tutoring program, that engages older adults to provide one-on-
one tutoring interventions in Phoenix schools to improve K-3 student literacy. The
program is an approved evidence-based intervention that improves student
achievement under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). The program targets Title
1 Phoenix schools with high percentages of students who are not reading at grade
level.
The program is part of Read On Phoenix, an initiative to get local students reading at
grade level by 3rd grade. In 2020, the Campaign for Grade-Level Reading (CGLR)
recognized the City as a “Bright Spot Community” for mitigating learning loss by
closing the digital gap; building educator capacity through professional development in
literacy; and expanding evidence-based literacy strategies to meet community needs
during the pandemic. The City was also recognized in 2016 and 2017 as a
“Pacesetter” community for ensuring academic success through literacy enrichment
programs.
Contract Term
The approved program agreement term is July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2024, with
Page 344
no options to extend.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the city.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Youth and
Education Office.
Page 345
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Canine Urban Search & Rescue Services Agreement with Arizona Search Dogs,
Inc. (Ordinance S-48827)
Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract
with Arizona Search Dogs, Inc. for canine urban search and rescue services. Further
request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
The contractor, Arizona Search Dogs, Inc., will support the continued development and
maintenance of the Canine Search Specialist component of Arizona Task Force One
(AZ-TF1), one of twenty-eight Urban Search and Rescue (US&R) task forces funded
through the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) to maintain a national US&R capability.
Arizona Search Dogs, Inc. will maintain a minimum of six and maximum of twelve
certified DHS/FEMA National US&R Response System Canine Search dogs that are
paired and certified with an AZ-TF1 handler, for response to emergency and disaster
sites with AZ-TF1 within four hours of activation.
Without these canine urban search and rescue certifications, Phoenix Fire would be
ineligible to receive various federal grant funds.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived,
citing a determination memo - without competition.
Contract Term
This request is for a maximum of five years, with the initial three-year term of the
contract from approximately July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025, and two one-year
options through June 30, 2027.
Financial Impact
Per the contract terms, the aggregate five-year cost shall not exceed $260,000. Funds
for this service are included in the Fire Department’s AZ-TF1 operating budget.
Page 346
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 347
Report
Inc. (Ordinance S-48827)
Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract
with Arizona Search Dogs, Inc. for canine urban search and rescue services. Further
request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
The contractor, Arizona Search Dogs, Inc., will support the continued development and
maintenance of the Canine Search Specialist component of Arizona Task Force One
(AZ-TF1), one of twenty-eight Urban Search and Rescue (US&R) task forces funded
through the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) to maintain a national US&R capability.
Arizona Search Dogs, Inc. will maintain a minimum of six and maximum of twelve
certified DHS/FEMA National US&R Response System Canine Search dogs that are
paired and certified with an AZ-TF1 handler, for response to emergency and disaster
sites with AZ-TF1 within four hours of activation.
Without these canine urban search and rescue certifications, Phoenix Fire would be
ineligible to receive various federal grant funds.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived,
citing a determination memo - without competition.
Contract Term
This request is for a maximum of five years, with the initial three-year term of the
contract from approximately July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025, and two one-year
options through June 30, 2027.
Financial Impact
Per the contract terms, the aggregate five-year cost shall not exceed $260,000. Funds
for this service are included in the Fire Department’s AZ-TF1 operating budget.
Page 346
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 347
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Fire Department Health Services Agreement (Ordinance S-48891)
Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
agreement with Williamson Valley Fire District for the Phoenix Fire Department Health
Center to provide health services to firefighters and police officers. These services
include physical examinations, immunizations, return to work evaluations, and
exposure management. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept
all funds related to this item.
Summary
The health services offered by the Phoenix Fire Department Health Center to sworn
firefighters and police officers are available in a single location, reducing the amount of
time public safety personnel are off-duty to seek multiple health services. In addition,
the provision of services to other jurisdictions will not negatively impact City of Phoenix
public safety personnel.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement shall commence upon execution and continue for a term of
five years.
Financial Impact
The jurisdiction utilizing these services will reimburse the City of Phoenix for all
services performed.
Location
The Phoenix Fire Department Health Center is located at 150 S. 12th St.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 348
Report
Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
agreement with Williamson Valley Fire District for the Phoenix Fire Department Health
Center to provide health services to firefighters and police officers. These services
include physical examinations, immunizations, return to work evaluations, and
exposure management. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept
all funds related to this item.
Summary
The health services offered by the Phoenix Fire Department Health Center to sworn
firefighters and police officers are available in a single location, reducing the amount of
time public safety personnel are off-duty to seek multiple health services. In addition,
the provision of services to other jurisdictions will not negatively impact City of Phoenix
public safety personnel.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement shall commence upon execution and continue for a term of
five years.
Financial Impact
The jurisdiction utilizing these services will reimburse the City of Phoenix for all
services performed.
Location
The Phoenix Fire Department Health Center is located at 150 S. 12th St.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 348
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Authorization to Apply for, Accept and enter into an Agreement for FY 2022 Paul
Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Formula Grant Program (Ordinance S-
48846)
Request retroactive authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the
Police Department to apply for, accept and enter into an agreement with the Arizona
Criminal Justice Commission for the FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science
Improvement Formula grant program in an amount not to exceed $136,865. Further
request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to
disburse, all funds related to this item.
Summary
The Police Department has applied for these grant funds over the past several years.
Funding is used to implement innovative solutions to the backlog issues facing many
crime laboratories nationwide. The Police Department's Crime Laboratory has made
significant strides in addressing these issues by utilizing these grant funds as part of a
comprehensive approach to support and enhance the services provided to the criminal
justice community. Funding will be utilized for overtime, related fringe benefits, and
supplies to improve the timeliness of forensic science services and to address the
backlogs in the analysis of forensic evidence.
The grant application was due on June 20, 2022.
Contract Term
The contract term is two years beginning Oct. 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
No matching funds are required.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 349
Report
Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Formula Grant Program (Ordinance S-
48846)
Request retroactive authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the
Police Department to apply for, accept and enter into an agreement with the Arizona
Criminal Justice Commission for the FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science
Improvement Formula grant program in an amount not to exceed $136,865. Further
request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to
disburse, all funds related to this item.
Summary
The Police Department has applied for these grant funds over the past several years.
Funding is used to implement innovative solutions to the backlog issues facing many
crime laboratories nationwide. The Police Department's Crime Laboratory has made
significant strides in addressing these issues by utilizing these grant funds as part of a
comprehensive approach to support and enhance the services provided to the criminal
justice community. Funding will be utilized for overtime, related fringe benefits, and
supplies to improve the timeliness of forensic science services and to address the
backlogs in the analysis of forensic evidence.
The grant application was due on June 20, 2022.
Contract Term
The contract term is two years beginning Oct. 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
No matching funds are required.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 349
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
FY 2022 Body-Worn Camera Policy and Implementation Program to Support Law
Enforcement Agencies Grant (Ordinance S-48856)
Request retroactive authorization for the City manager, or his designee, to allow the
Police Department to apply for, accept and enter into an agreement with the U.S.
Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance for
the FY 2022 Body-Worn Camera Policy and Implementation Program to Support Law
Enforcement Agencies Grant. The total funding requested is $1 million. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item.
Summary
The goal of this grant is to support existing digital evidence integration demonstration
efforts in law enforcement agencies, prosecution agencies, or in partnerships between
such agencies to support digital evidence sharing and integration across two or more
agencies. The funding provided under this grant will be used to purchase additional
Evidence.com Pro licenses to accommodate additional police department employees.
The licensing will provide access to the "Residents" portion of the capture application,
which will allow officers in the field and community members to upload digital
evidence, as well as other product enhancements. Funds awarded under this grant will
be used to purchase equipment and licensing to transform the department to a full,
digital evidence management solution.
The grant application was due May 25, 2022. If authorization is denied, the grant
application will be rescinded.
Contract Term
Three years beginning Oct. 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
The total funding requested is $1 million. No matching funds are required.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 350
Report
Enforcement Agencies Grant (Ordinance S-48856)
Request retroactive authorization for the City manager, or his designee, to allow the
Police Department to apply for, accept and enter into an agreement with the U.S.
Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance for
the FY 2022 Body-Worn Camera Policy and Implementation Program to Support Law
Enforcement Agencies Grant. The total funding requested is $1 million. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item.
Summary
The goal of this grant is to support existing digital evidence integration demonstration
efforts in law enforcement agencies, prosecution agencies, or in partnerships between
such agencies to support digital evidence sharing and integration across two or more
agencies. The funding provided under this grant will be used to purchase additional
Evidence.com Pro licenses to accommodate additional police department employees.
The licensing will provide access to the "Residents" portion of the capture application,
which will allow officers in the field and community members to upload digital
evidence, as well as other product enhancements. Funds awarded under this grant will
be used to purchase equipment and licensing to transform the department to a full,
digital evidence management solution.
The grant application was due May 25, 2022. If authorization is denied, the grant
application will be rescinded.
Contract Term
Three years beginning Oct. 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
The total funding requested is $1 million. No matching funds are required.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 350
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Authorization to Amend Ordinance for Downtown Camera Project (Ordinance S-
48867)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the current
Ordinance (S-48123) to replace and redesign the security camera system in the City's
downtown core. Authorization of the amendment will add the total cost of the project of
$1.6 million to the Ordinance that was approved by City Council at the Dec. 1, 2021
meeting. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item.
Summary
Between 2008-2012, the Phoenix Police Department's Homeland Defense Bureau’s
Threat Mitigation Unit utilized grant funding to begin incrementally building a downtown
camera capability within the City’s downtown core complex (defined as Jackson Street
to the I-10 Freeway, 7th Avenue to 7th Street). Over time, the Homeland Security
Grant Program funding was reduced and remains a highly competitive process. The
Department of Justice/Federal Emergency Management Agency has also placed an
increased emphasis on ensuring a regional benefit of all projects funded. This change
in guidance no longer makes it possible for the City of Phoenix to utilize Urban Area
Security Initiative (UASI) funding to sustain and grow the downtown camera system.
Of the original 60 cameras installed only about 25 remain in varying states of
operational condition. As the City of Phoenix prepares for the upcoming Super Bowl
and multiple high-profile activities that will take place in the downtown core, access to
a comprehensive camera network is critical to effectively manage public safety and the
preservation of our City’s critical infrastructure.
The proposed project for Phase I (approved Dec.1, 2021) includes:
· The replacement of approximately 33 Homeland Defense Bureau cameras
(approximate cost $200,000).
· Installation of 15 cameras in the downtown core on a wireless transmission system
(approximate cost $200,000).
· Adding necessary IT infrastructure, servers and storage (approximate cost
$200,000).
Page 351
The proposed project for Phase II includes:
· Cabling for 10 rooftop sites (approximate cost $250,000).
· Installation of 49 rooftop cameras (approximate cost $90,000).
· Purchase 40 street-level cameras (approximate cost $160,000).
· Purchase cellular backhaul solutions (approximate cost $500,000).
Once Phase II funding is approved, the Homeland Defense Bureau’s Threat Mitigation
Unit will partner with Public Works and Information Technology Services (ITS) for
specific quotes and development of a deployment and installation plan. ITS is aware of
this project; however, there is no current impact until the purchasing phase for the
requested equipment.
Procurement Information
The items required for this project will be purchased utilizing existing City of Phoenix
contract vendors. No competitive process will be required however, amendments to
increase contract spending limits may be required in the future with dates to be
determined.
Financial Impact
The first phase of this project (approved Dec.1, 2021) is $600,000 and phase II is
$1,000,000. The total projected investment costs are estimated to be $1.6 million to
complete. Funds are available in the Phoenix Police Department's budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Phase I funding as well as the conceptual approval of the entire project was approved
by City Council at the Dec. 1, 2021 meeting.
Location
Downtown core, Jackson Street to the I-10 Freeway, 7th Avenue to 7th Street.
Council Districts: 7 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 352
Report
48867)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the current
Ordinance (S-48123) to replace and redesign the security camera system in the City's
downtown core. Authorization of the amendment will add the total cost of the project of
$1.6 million to the Ordinance that was approved by City Council at the Dec. 1, 2021
meeting. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item.
Summary
Between 2008-2012, the Phoenix Police Department's Homeland Defense Bureau’s
Threat Mitigation Unit utilized grant funding to begin incrementally building a downtown
camera capability within the City’s downtown core complex (defined as Jackson Street
to the I-10 Freeway, 7th Avenue to 7th Street). Over time, the Homeland Security
Grant Program funding was reduced and remains a highly competitive process. The
Department of Justice/Federal Emergency Management Agency has also placed an
increased emphasis on ensuring a regional benefit of all projects funded. This change
in guidance no longer makes it possible for the City of Phoenix to utilize Urban Area
Security Initiative (UASI) funding to sustain and grow the downtown camera system.
Of the original 60 cameras installed only about 25 remain in varying states of
operational condition. As the City of Phoenix prepares for the upcoming Super Bowl
and multiple high-profile activities that will take place in the downtown core, access to
a comprehensive camera network is critical to effectively manage public safety and the
preservation of our City’s critical infrastructure.
The proposed project for Phase I (approved Dec.1, 2021) includes:
· The replacement of approximately 33 Homeland Defense Bureau cameras
(approximate cost $200,000).
· Installation of 15 cameras in the downtown core on a wireless transmission system
(approximate cost $200,000).
· Adding necessary IT infrastructure, servers and storage (approximate cost
$200,000).
Page 351
The proposed project for Phase II includes:
· Cabling for 10 rooftop sites (approximate cost $250,000).
· Installation of 49 rooftop cameras (approximate cost $90,000).
· Purchase 40 street-level cameras (approximate cost $160,000).
· Purchase cellular backhaul solutions (approximate cost $500,000).
Once Phase II funding is approved, the Homeland Defense Bureau’s Threat Mitigation
Unit will partner with Public Works and Information Technology Services (ITS) for
specific quotes and development of a deployment and installation plan. ITS is aware of
this project; however, there is no current impact until the purchasing phase for the
requested equipment.
Procurement Information
The items required for this project will be purchased utilizing existing City of Phoenix
contract vendors. No competitive process will be required however, amendments to
increase contract spending limits may be required in the future with dates to be
determined.
Financial Impact
The first phase of this project (approved Dec.1, 2021) is $600,000 and phase II is
$1,000,000. The total projected investment costs are estimated to be $1.6 million to
complete. Funds are available in the Phoenix Police Department's budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Phase I funding as well as the conceptual approval of the entire project was approved
by City Council at the Dec. 1, 2021 meeting.
Location
Downtown core, Jackson Street to the I-10 Freeway, 7th Avenue to 7th Street.
Council Districts: 7 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 352
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Donation from Phoenix Police Foundation for Victim Center Renovation
(Ordinance S-48873)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept a donation from the
Phoenix Police Foundation up to $550,000. Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept all funds, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item.
Summary
The Phoenix Police Department’s Family Investigations Bureau (FIB) sees over 2,400
sexual and domestic violence victims every year, the most victims anywhere in the
state, yet have one of the oldest facilities in the state. Victims of all races, gender, and
age visit the facility, often within hours after encountering severe physical and mental
trauma. The FIB also serves vulnerable victims in the LGBTQ+ community, homeless
populations, and sex trafficking victims. Trauma-informed care practices have
advanced over the years and highlight the need for a safe, comfortable environment
for victims to recount the assault to officers and collect forensics related to these
traumatic experiences. The FIB needs to continue to lead the state by facilitating an
advocacy center that meets the unique and fragile needs of victims of domestic and
sexual violence.
The standard practice changes made by the newer advocacy centers have not been
incorporated into the Phoenix Family Advocacy Center. Currently, victims do not have
a private location and must wait in a public waiting area with high foot traffic. This is not
ideal as many victims are experiencing a traumatic event and are attempting to gain a
sense of dignity and control of their lives which have just been turned upside down.
Victims must also walk past the employee break room, offices, file rooms, and
detective cubicles in order to reach the interview rooms. The Phoenix Police
Foundation is raising funds to create a new Victims Center within the existing Family
Investigations Bureau. This new space will provide a more welcoming environment,
with warmer interview rooms and a pass-through entryway into the Forensic Nurse
Examination (FNE) rooms, allowing victims to feel more safe and secure. The private
rooms will also be the central area from which victims will be walked through the
investigative process. The goal is to lead the state in how we serve, protect, and mend
victims of sexual and domestic violence with our various partners at the Family
Advocacy Center.
Page 353
In conjunction with the creation of the Victim Center, the Family Investigations Bureau
is seeking to reconfigure the workplace for supervisors and detectives. The relocation
of the current interview rooms, along with outdated technology and monitoring rooms,
will provide a space large enough to accommodate a medium size conference room.
The current pandemic has demonstrated the need to have a conferencing room for
various remote meetings and trainings. The space would create a room for patrol
officers to brief detectives and supervisors on investigations requiring immediate follow
-up. Currently, patrol officers brief detectives and supervisors on cases in the
employee break room.
The Phoenix Police Foundation is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization. The Foundation
is committed to addressing unmet capital needs of the Phoenix Police Department,
providing financial assistance in crisis situations, and recognizing those who protect
our community.
Financial Impact
The creation of the Victims Center and workspace renovations have been anticipated
to cost approximately $550,000. The Phoenix Police Foundation is raising funds
pending approval of this donation by the City Council.
Location
2120 N. Central Ave.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 354
Report
(Ordinance S-48873)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept a donation from the
Phoenix Police Foundation up to $550,000. Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept all funds, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item.
Summary
The Phoenix Police Department’s Family Investigations Bureau (FIB) sees over 2,400
sexual and domestic violence victims every year, the most victims anywhere in the
state, yet have one of the oldest facilities in the state. Victims of all races, gender, and
age visit the facility, often within hours after encountering severe physical and mental
trauma. The FIB also serves vulnerable victims in the LGBTQ+ community, homeless
populations, and sex trafficking victims. Trauma-informed care practices have
advanced over the years and highlight the need for a safe, comfortable environment
for victims to recount the assault to officers and collect forensics related to these
traumatic experiences. The FIB needs to continue to lead the state by facilitating an
advocacy center that meets the unique and fragile needs of victims of domestic and
sexual violence.
The standard practice changes made by the newer advocacy centers have not been
incorporated into the Phoenix Family Advocacy Center. Currently, victims do not have
a private location and must wait in a public waiting area with high foot traffic. This is not
ideal as many victims are experiencing a traumatic event and are attempting to gain a
sense of dignity and control of their lives which have just been turned upside down.
Victims must also walk past the employee break room, offices, file rooms, and
detective cubicles in order to reach the interview rooms. The Phoenix Police
Foundation is raising funds to create a new Victims Center within the existing Family
Investigations Bureau. This new space will provide a more welcoming environment,
with warmer interview rooms and a pass-through entryway into the Forensic Nurse
Examination (FNE) rooms, allowing victims to feel more safe and secure. The private
rooms will also be the central area from which victims will be walked through the
investigative process. The goal is to lead the state in how we serve, protect, and mend
victims of sexual and domestic violence with our various partners at the Family
Advocacy Center.
Page 353
In conjunction with the creation of the Victim Center, the Family Investigations Bureau
is seeking to reconfigure the workplace for supervisors and detectives. The relocation
of the current interview rooms, along with outdated technology and monitoring rooms,
will provide a space large enough to accommodate a medium size conference room.
The current pandemic has demonstrated the need to have a conferencing room for
various remote meetings and trainings. The space would create a room for patrol
officers to brief detectives and supervisors on investigations requiring immediate follow
-up. Currently, patrol officers brief detectives and supervisors on cases in the
employee break room.
The Phoenix Police Foundation is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization. The Foundation
is committed to addressing unmet capital needs of the Phoenix Police Department,
providing financial assistance in crisis situations, and recognizing those who protect
our community.
Financial Impact
The creation of the Victims Center and workspace renovations have been anticipated
to cost approximately $550,000. The Phoenix Police Foundation is raising funds
pending approval of this donation by the City Council.
Location
2120 N. Central Ave.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 354
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend Agreements with Various School Districts for Funding of School
Resource Officers (Ordinance S-48889)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the current
Ordinance (S-48726) with various school districts for the placement of School
Resource Officers (SROs). Authorization of the amendment will add Laveen
Elementary and ASU Preparatory Academy to the 2022-23 list of school districts.
Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this
item.
Summary
The Police Department enters into Intergovernmental Agreements with various school
districts (at the school district's request) to assist with the cost of SROs deployed in
schools. Funding for these SROs is provided through partnerships with the Arizona
Department of Education and individual school districts. Through this partnership,
school district funds reimburse the City for 75 percent of the SRO's salary, while the
remaining 25 percent is paid by the City.
The amended ordinance will add Laveen Elementary and ASU Preparatory Academy
to the 2022-23 list of school districts. All other terms will remain unchanged.
Contract Term
The terms of these agreements are one year, with varying start and end dates to
coincide with each school's 2022-23 school year.
Financial Impact
Cost to the City is 25 percent match for the SRO salary and fringe benefits.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-48726 was approved by the City Council at the June 15, 2022 meeting.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 355
Report
Resource Officers (Ordinance S-48889)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the current
Ordinance (S-48726) with various school districts for the placement of School
Resource Officers (SROs). Authorization of the amendment will add Laveen
Elementary and ASU Preparatory Academy to the 2022-23 list of school districts.
Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this
item.
Summary
The Police Department enters into Intergovernmental Agreements with various school
districts (at the school district's request) to assist with the cost of SROs deployed in
schools. Funding for these SROs is provided through partnerships with the Arizona
Department of Education and individual school districts. Through this partnership,
school district funds reimburse the City for 75 percent of the SRO's salary, while the
remaining 25 percent is paid by the City.
The amended ordinance will add Laveen Elementary and ASU Preparatory Academy
to the 2022-23 list of school districts. All other terms will remain unchanged.
Contract Term
The terms of these agreements are one year, with varying start and end dates to
coincide with each school's 2022-23 school year.
Financial Impact
Cost to the City is 25 percent match for the SRO salary and fringe benefits.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-48726 was approved by the City Council at the June 15, 2022 meeting.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 355
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Trunarc Consumables and Service - RFA 18-323-Additional Funds (Ordinance S-
48897)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 150081 with Thermo Scientific Portable Analytical
Instruments Inc. for the purchase of Trunarc instruments, consumables and annual
services for the Police Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$17,000.
Summary
The Trunarc handheld narcotics analyzer is essential to detect the presence of
dangerous and illegal substances safely and in a timely manner. Trunarc delivers clear,
real time results on over 400 substances, while also greatly reducing the exposure of
responding law enforcement officers to potentially lethal narcotics. The device's library
is regularly updated to include emerging drug threats, thus keeping it relevant despite
the ever evolving substances. Additional funds are needed to cover purchases for the
remaining life of the contract.
Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on May 31, 2024.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $17,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $550,907. Funds are available in the Police Department’s
budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 356
Report
48897)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 150081 with Thermo Scientific Portable Analytical
Instruments Inc. for the purchase of Trunarc instruments, consumables and annual
services for the Police Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$17,000.
Summary
The Trunarc handheld narcotics analyzer is essential to detect the presence of
dangerous and illegal substances safely and in a timely manner. Trunarc delivers clear,
real time results on over 400 substances, while also greatly reducing the exposure of
responding law enforcement officers to potentially lethal narcotics. The device's library
is regularly updated to include emerging drug threats, thus keeping it relevant despite
the ever evolving substances. Additional funds are needed to cover purchases for the
remaining life of the contract.
Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on May 31, 2024.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $17,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $550,907. Funds are available in the Police Department’s
budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 356
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
North Gateway Transfer Station, Materials Recovery Facility Fire Suppression
System - Amendment to Ordinance S-48330
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Ordinance S-48330
with Fire Rover LLC, to allow an exception, pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-
20, to include indemnification and limitation of damages provisions that otherwise
would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18. No additional funding is
requested for this amendment.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to provide an exception to Phoenix City Code
section 42-18 that is required based on the terms of the contract with Fire Rover LLC
to install a fire protection system at the Public Works Department's North Gateway
Materials Recovery Facility.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Ordinance S-48330 on Feb. 16, 2022.
Location
North Gateway Transfer Station - 30205 N. Black Canyon Highway.
Council District: 2
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.
Page 357
Report
System - Amendment to Ordinance S-48330
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Ordinance S-48330
with Fire Rover LLC, to allow an exception, pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-
20, to include indemnification and limitation of damages provisions that otherwise
would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18. No additional funding is
requested for this amendment.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to provide an exception to Phoenix City Code
section 42-18 that is required based on the terms of the contract with Fire Rover LLC
to install a fire protection system at the Public Works Department's North Gateway
Materials Recovery Facility.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Ordinance S-48330 on Feb. 16, 2022.
Location
North Gateway Transfer Station - 30205 N. Black Canyon Highway.
Council District: 2
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.
Page 357
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
One-Time Rental of SR85 Landfill CAT Dozer (Ordinance S-48857)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Empire Southwest, LLC, for rental of a Caterpillar (CAT) Dozer for the SR85 Landfill.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of this contract will not exceed $48,093.
Summary
The Public Works Department is requesting to rent a CAT Dozer for the SR85 Landfill
during the downtime of the existing unit while it is being repaired. The dozer will be
used to cover refuse as required by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ).
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived in
lieu of a determination memo citing time restriction. Operations need to continue at the
landfill while the current unit is down for repair. The below cost will be for a five-month
rental.
Empire Southwest, LLC: $48,093
Contract Term
This will be for the one-time rental of a CAT Dozer, starting on or about July 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
This total value of this contract will not exceed $48,093.
Funding is available in the Public Works Department's budget.
Location
SR85 Landfill - 28633 W. Patterson Road, Buckeye, Ariz.
Council District: Out of City
Page 358
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.
Page 359
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Empire Southwest, LLC, for rental of a Caterpillar (CAT) Dozer for the SR85 Landfill.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of this contract will not exceed $48,093.
Summary
The Public Works Department is requesting to rent a CAT Dozer for the SR85 Landfill
during the downtime of the existing unit while it is being repaired. The dozer will be
used to cover refuse as required by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ).
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived in
lieu of a determination memo citing time restriction. Operations need to continue at the
landfill while the current unit is down for repair. The below cost will be for a five-month
rental.
Empire Southwest, LLC: $48,093
Contract Term
This will be for the one-time rental of a CAT Dozer, starting on or about July 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
This total value of this contract will not exceed $48,093.
Funding is available in the Public Works Department's budget.
Location
SR85 Landfill - 28633 W. Patterson Road, Buckeye, Ariz.
Council District: Out of City
Page 358
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.
Page 359
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
HVAC Maintenance, Repair and Replacement Contract - Amendment (Ordinance
S-48896)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures to heating, ventilating, air condition (HVAC) maintenance, repair and
replacement contracts: 151101 with TD Industries, Inc.; 151102 with United
Technologies, Inc.; 151097 with Artic Air Heating & Cooling, Inc.; 151099 with HACI
Service, LLC; 151098 with Boyjin Development, LLC; and 151100 with Service Pros
Plumbing and Heating & Cooling, Inc. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $1
million.
Summary
The vendors on these contracts provide the City with full HVAC maintenance and
repair, duct design, installation, and fabrication services at various City facilities. The
Human Services Department is a customer of the Public Works Department for HVAC
services at the recently opened Homeless Respite Shelter, located at 2739 E.
Washington St. The additional spending capacity for the contracts is needed to provide
continued HVAC preventative maintenance repairs and equipment replacement at the
shelter. No new funding is being requested for the shelter operations.
Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid (IFB) 20-FMD-009 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. The Public Works Department received 12 offers, with six vendors
being recommended for award. Six groups were identified in the bid submittal. Groups
1 and 4: full-service maintenance and repairs on commercial and industrial HVAC
equipment for multiple departments; Groups 2 and 5: full-service maintenance and
repairs on residential HVAC equipment for multiple departments; and Groups 3 and 6:
duct design, installation and fabrication for multiple departments. The offers were
evaluated based on price, responsiveness to specifications, and responsibility to
provide the required goods and services. Six vendors were recommended for award.
Contract Term
These contracts had an initial one-year contract term, with four option years to be
exercised in increments of up to one year. The contracts will expire on Oct. 31, 2022.
Page 360
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for these agreements was for an expenditure not-to-exceed
$7,425,000. This request will increase the authorization of the agreement by an
additional $1 million, for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $8,425,000.
Funding is available in the Public Works Department's budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved agreements 151101, 151102, 151097, 151099, 151098,
and 151100 (Ordinance S-46054) on Oct. 2, 2019.
Location
2739 E. Washington St.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Gina Montes and Karen Peters and
the Human Services and Public Works departments.
Page 361
Report
S-48896)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures to heating, ventilating, air condition (HVAC) maintenance, repair and
replacement contracts: 151101 with TD Industries, Inc.; 151102 with United
Technologies, Inc.; 151097 with Artic Air Heating & Cooling, Inc.; 151099 with HACI
Service, LLC; 151098 with Boyjin Development, LLC; and 151100 with Service Pros
Plumbing and Heating & Cooling, Inc. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $1
million.
Summary
The vendors on these contracts provide the City with full HVAC maintenance and
repair, duct design, installation, and fabrication services at various City facilities. The
Human Services Department is a customer of the Public Works Department for HVAC
services at the recently opened Homeless Respite Shelter, located at 2739 E.
Washington St. The additional spending capacity for the contracts is needed to provide
continued HVAC preventative maintenance repairs and equipment replacement at the
shelter. No new funding is being requested for the shelter operations.
Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid (IFB) 20-FMD-009 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. The Public Works Department received 12 offers, with six vendors
being recommended for award. Six groups were identified in the bid submittal. Groups
1 and 4: full-service maintenance and repairs on commercial and industrial HVAC
equipment for multiple departments; Groups 2 and 5: full-service maintenance and
repairs on residential HVAC equipment for multiple departments; and Groups 3 and 6:
duct design, installation and fabrication for multiple departments. The offers were
evaluated based on price, responsiveness to specifications, and responsibility to
provide the required goods and services. Six vendors were recommended for award.
Contract Term
These contracts had an initial one-year contract term, with four option years to be
exercised in increments of up to one year. The contracts will expire on Oct. 31, 2022.
Page 360
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for these agreements was for an expenditure not-to-exceed
$7,425,000. This request will increase the authorization of the agreement by an
additional $1 million, for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $8,425,000.
Funding is available in the Public Works Department's budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved agreements 151101, 151102, 151097, 151099, 151098,
and 151100 (Ordinance S-46054) on Oct. 2, 2019.
Location
2739 E. Washington St.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Gina Montes and Karen Peters and
the Human Services and Public Works departments.
Page 361
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend City Code - Section 36-158, Schedule I, Local Speed Limits at 27
Locations (Ordinance G-6997)
Request to amend Phoenix City Code, Section 36-158, Schedule I, Local Speed Limits
at 27 locations due to record keeping and local speed limit changes.
Summary
Speed limits are established under Arizona Revised Statutes, section 28-703, which
requires an “engineering study and traffic investigation.” The Phoenix City Code and
Charter require that all local speed limits on City streets be approved by City Council in
the form of an amendment to Phoenix City Code.
The Street Transportation Department (Streets) is recommending 26 record keeping
updates and one speed limit change for the 27 locations listed in Attachment A and
adoption of recommended changes to Phoenix City Code, Section 36-158, Schedule I,
Local Speed Limits in Attachment B. Streets staff has conducted a comprehensive
review of the speed limit ordinance and has noted locations where speed limits posted
on City streets do not match the speed limits included in the current ordinance. In
addition to these record keeping changes, there are streets or street segments that are
being removed from the ordinance as they are either private or no longer part of the
City’s street network. As with all recommended speed limit changes, they are based on
traffic investigations conducted with the engineering judgment of Streets staff.
Streets actively and regularly reviews posted speed limits and reconciles any
discrepancies with the ordinance. Field reviews are typically conducted by Streets
Traffic Services Investigations team, but most recently this effort has been supported
by the Universal Right-of-Way Inspections team. Field reviews over the last year have
been completed for over 700 street segments. In April 2021, findings and corrections
from approximately half of the reviews conducted were presented to City Council and
adopted. This update includes findings and corrections from the second half of the
reviews conducted.
This item was previously recommended for Council approval by the Transportation,
Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee on April 20, 2022. However, following that
action, Streets staff since discovered that the current speed limit ordinance last
Page 362
approved by City Council on April 21, 2021 (Ordinance G-6839) does not accurately
reflect all speed limit ordinance updates previously approved by City Council over the
last few years. In response, Streets staff conducted a review and made necessary
adjustments to ensure that Attachment B includes the 27 current updates, as well as
the ordinance updates previously approved by Council in 2020 and 2021.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item:
· On April 20, 2022, by a vote of 3-0; and
· On June 15, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 363
ATTACHMENT A
SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN CITY OF PHOENIX SPEED LIMITS
AMENDING SECTION 36-158, SCHEDULE I - LOCAL SPEED LIMITS
Locations to be removed from ordinance not within Phoenix right-of-way
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Remove
Carefree Highway 6600 West to 4700 West from ordinance. Outside of N/A
Phoenix boundary.
Record keeping. Remove
Carefree Highway 4700 West to 3900 West from ordinance. Outside N/A
Phoenix boundary.
Record keeping. Remove
3900 West to 700 Feet East
Carefree Highway from ordinance. Outside of
of 33rd Avenue N/A
Phoenix boundary.
Record keeping. Remove
from ordinance. Arizona
Grand Avenue 43rd Avenue to 21st Avenue 4, 5 and 7
Department of Transportation
roadway.
Record keeping. Remove
from ordinance. Arizona
Grand Avenue 21st Avenue to 19th Avenue 4 and 7
Department of Transportation
roadway.
Record keeping. Remove
Camelback Road to
56th Street from ordinance. Private 6
Rockridge Road
roadway.
Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 mph at all times
Locations to be removed from ordinance
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Remove
from ordinance to align with
Jefferson Street 4th Street to 7th Street 8
the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
Lincoln Drive to Phoenix from ordinance to align with
Piestewa Peak Drive 6
Mountain Preserve Entrance the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
from ordinance to align with
Virginia Avenue 7th Street to 12th Street 4
the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
from ordinance to align with
Washington Street 4th Street to 7th Street 8
the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
Van Buren Street to from ordinance to align with
3rd Avenue 7
McDowell Road the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
Van Buren Street to from ordinance to align with
5th Avenue 7
McDowell Road the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
Cinnabar Avenue to Peoria from ordinance to align with
7th Avenue 3
Avenue the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Page 364
Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 mph at all times
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Change
1,200 Feet West of 35th
Deer Valley Drive ordinance to align with the 1
Avenue to 35th Avenue
posted speed limit of 30 mph.
Speed limit change. Lower
Grand Avenue 7th Avenue to 15th Avenue ordinance speed limit from 35 7
mph to 30 mph.
Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 mph at all times
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Change
0.25 mile south of Magnolia
15th Avenue ordinance to align with the 7
Street to Bethany Home Rd
posted speed limit of 35 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Happy Valley to 800 Feet
35th Avenue ordinance to align with the 1
north of Hackamore Dr
posted speed limit of 35 mph.
Record keeping. Change
800 feet north of Hackamore
Pocono Way ordinance to align with the 1
Drive to 33rd Avenue
posted speed limit of 35 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Pocono Way to Pinnacle
33rd Avenue ordinance to align with the 1
Vista Drive
posted speed limit of 30 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Grand Avenue 18th Avenue to 15th Avenue ordinance to align with the 4
posted speed limit of 30 mph.
Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 mph at all times
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Change
Baseline Road 43rd Avenue to 35th Avenue ordinance to align with the 7
posted speed limit of 40 mph.
Record keeping. Change
700 feet west of North Valley
Carefree Highway ordinance to align with the 2
Parkway to Via Puzzola Drive
posted speed limit of 40 mph.
Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 mph at all times
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Change
Baseline Road 55th Avenue to 43rd Avenue ordinance to align with the 7
posted speed limit of 45 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Baseline Road 35th Avenue to 7th Avenue ordinance to align with the 7
posted speed limit of 45 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Via Puzzola Drive to 0.5 miles
Carefree Highway ordinance to align with the 2
east of Paloma Parkway
posted speed limit of 45 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Broadway Road to Buckeye
83rd Avenue ordinance to align with the 7
Road
posted speed limit of 45 mph.
Page 365
Prima Facie Speed Limit 50 mph at all times
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Change
0.5 Miles east of Paloma
Carefree Highway ordinance to align with the 2
Parkway to 7th Avenue
posted speed limit of 50 mph.
Note: All speed limit changes were recommended based on a traffic study and approved by a Traffic Engineer.
Page 366
ATTACHMENT B
ARTICLE XII. PENALTY AND SCHEDULES
36-158 Schedule I—Local speed limits.
It is hereby determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed limit
permitted by state law on the following streets or intersections is greater or less than is reasonable
under existing conditions, and it is hereby declared that the maximum speed limits shall be as
hereinafter set forth on those streets, parts of streets or intersections herein designated at the times
specified when signs are erected giving notice thereof.
The City Traffic Engineer may declare a maximum speed limit that is determined pursuant to this section
to be effective at all times or at such times as indicated on the speed limit signs. The City Traffic
Engineer may establish lower speed limits for different times of day, different types of vehicles, varying
weather conditions, special events, work zones for construction, maintenance or other activity in the
roadway and other factors bearing on safe speeds. The lower limits are effective when posted on
appropriate fixed, variable or portable signs.
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Acoma Drive 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue
Acoma Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 23rd Avenue
Acoma Drive 36th Street to 40th Street
Acoma Drive Tatum Boulevard to 64th Street
Arroyo Norte Drive Northbound I-17 Frontage Road to 3900 West
Beardsley Road 32nd Street to 34th Street
Butler Drive 39th Avenue to 27th Avenue
Butler Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue
Campbell Avenue 71st Avenue to 51st Avenue
Campbell Avenue 113th Avenue to 107th Avenue
Campbell Avenue 35th Avenue to 15th Avenue
Campbell Avenue 12th Street to 16th Street
Page 367
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Campbell Avenue 20th Street to 44th Street
Canterbury Drive Thunderbird Road to Tam-O-Shanter Drive
Cashman Drive Pinnacle Peak Road to 44th Street
Central Avenue Lincoln Street to Madison Street
Central Avenue Grovers Avenue to Union Hills Drive
Chauncey Lane 68th Street to Scottsdale Road
Cholla Street 24th Street to 56th Street
Clarendon Avenue 55th Avenue to Maryvale Parkway
Colter Street 16th Street to SR-51
Copperhead Trail North Valley Parkway to Gambit Trail
Copperhead Trail West of 14th Lane Traffic Circle to Gambit Trail
Coral Gables Drive Thunderbird Road to 7th Street
DEER VALLEY DRIVE 1,200 FEET WEST OF 35TH AVENUE TO 35TH AVENUE
Desert Willow Parkway East Dixileta Drive to Dynamite Boulevard
Desert Willow Parkway 30200 North Cave Creek Road to 31000 North Cave Creek Road
West
Dove Valley Road 52nd Place to 56th Street
Dunlap Avenue 7th Street to 12th Street
Durango Street 67th Avenue to 63rd Avenue
Elwood Street 40th Street to 48th Street
Encanto Boulevard 93rd Avenue to 91st Avenue
Page 368
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Encanto Boulevard 75th Avenue to 73rd Avenue
Encanto Boulevard 71st Avenue to 51st Avenue
Encanto Boulevard 49th Avenue to 31st Avenue
Encanto Boulevard Grand Avenue to 19th Avenue
Freemont Road Rough Rider Road to Cashman Drive
Galvin Parkway 100 Feet +/- North of East Papago Park to Traffic Circle at Botanical
Garden Entrance
GRAND AVENUE 7TH AVENUE TO 15TH AVENUE
Greenway Road 20th Street to Cave Creek Road
Grovers Avenue 51st Avenue to 27th Avenue
Grovers Avenue Central Avenue to Cave Creek Road
Hatcher Road Central Avenue to 12th Street
Highland Avenue Campbell Avenue to 107th Avenue
Highland Avenue 16th Street to 24th Street
Illini Street 30th Street to Riverpoint Parkway
Jefferson Street 27th Avenue to 23rd Avenue
Jefferson Street 7th Avenue to 4th Avenue
JEFFERSON STREET 4TH STREET TO 7TH STREET
Jesse Owens Parkway Central Avenue to 7th Street
Jones Avenue 103rd Avenue to 99th Avenue
Kelton Lane 29th Avenue to 28th Avenue
Page 369
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Knox Road Warpaint Drive to 36th Street
Lakewood Parkway West 3300 East to 3600 East to 17000 South to 15800 South
Lakewood Parkway East 3600 East to 3800 East to 17000 South to 15800 South
Lindner Drive (West 45th Avenue to Augusta North
Section)
Lindner Drive (East 45th Avenue to Grovers Avenue
Section)
Lockwood Drive Freemont Road to Cashman Drive
Marriott Drive Pathfinder Drive to Deer Valley Drive
Maryland Avenue 43rd Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway
Maryvale Parkway 51st Avenue to Indian School Road
Missouri Avenue 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue
Missouri Avenue Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue
Mohave Street 7th Avenue to 7th Street
Morningside Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 21st Avenue
Morten Avenue 16th Street to 1900 East
Mountain View Road 23rd Avenue to 15th Avenue
Mountain View Road 12th Street to 17th Street
Mountain View Road 32nd Street to 36th Street
Northern Avenue 26th Street to 32nd Street
North Valley Parkway Carefree Highway to 33rd Lane
Oak Street 16th Street to 24th Street
Page 370
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Oak Street 32nd Street to 44th Street
Oak Street 48th Street to 52nd Street
Oak Street (Eastbound) 56th Street to 64th Street
Olympic Drive Central Avenue to Jesse Owens Parkway
Orangewood Avenue 43rd Avenue to 19th Avenue
Osborn Road 83rd Avenue to 75th Avenue
Osborn Road 73rd Avenue to Grand Avenue
Osborn Road Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue
Osborn Road 40th Street to 56th Street
Paradise Lane 7th Street to 16th Street
Paradise Lane Tatum Boulevard to 56th Street
Paradise Lane 47th Avenue to 43rd Avenue
Pathfinder Drive 44th Street to Marriott Drive
Piedmont Road 48th Street to 51st Street
Pinnacle Vista Drive Pyramid Peak Parkway to Inspiration Mountain Parkway
Pinnacle Vista Drive 52nd Street to 56th Street
Quail Track Drive North Valley Parkway to Copperhead Trail
Ranger Drive Tatum Boulevard to 55th Street
Riverpoint Parkway Wood Street to Illini Street
Roeser Road 7th Avenue to Central Avenue
Roeser Road 40th Street to 48th Street
Page 371
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Roosevelt Street 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue
Roosevelt Street 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue
Roosevelt Street 33rd Avenue to 27th Avenue
Roosevelt Street 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Roosevelt Street Central Avenue to 16th Street
Rose Garden Lane 29th Avenue to 19th Avenue
Rough Rider Road Aviano Way to 40th Street
Sells Drive 79th Drive to 71st Drive
Sky Crossing Way Deer Valley Road to 33rd Street
SQUAW PEAK DRIVE LINCOLN DRIVE TO SQUAW PEAK PARK BOUNDARY
SR-51 (East Access Road) 500 Feet North of Camelback Road to Colter Street
Stanford Drive 40th Street to 44th Street
Stetson Hills Loop 43rd Avenue to 39th Drive
Sweetwater Avenue 51st Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway
Sweetwater Avenue 32nd Street to 42nd Street
Sweetwater Avenue Paradise Valley Parkway East to Scottsdale Road
Thunderbird Road 28th Street to 32nd Street
Trailblazer Drive 44th Street to Tatum Boulevard
University Drive 24th Street to Magnolia Street (2700 East)
Utopia Road 23rd Avenue to 19th Avenue
Van Buren Street 7th Street to 16th Street
Page 372
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Via Del Deserto 33rd Lane to Via Puzzola
Via Puzzola Carefree Highway to Cloud Road
Via Tramonto Carefree Highway to Via Vista
Via Vista 27th Avenue to Via Tramonto
Vineyard Road 47th Avenue to 43rd Avenue
Virginia Avenue 35th Avenue to 27th Avenue
VIRGINIA AVENUE CENTRAL AVENUE TO 12TH STREET
VIRGINA AVENUE CENTRAL AVENUE TO 7TH STREET
Warpaint Drive Knox Road to Coconino Street
Washington Street 7th Avenue to 4th Avenue
WASHINGTON STREET 4TH STREET TO 7TH STREET
Wier Avenue 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue
Winchcomb Drive 26th Avenue to Acoma Drive (2300 West)
Wood Street Riverpoint Parkway to University Drive
1st Avenue Grant Street to Roosevelt Street
3RD AVENUE VAN BUREN STREET TO MCDOWELL ROAD
3rd Avenue Thomas Road to Osborn Road
3rd Street Monroe Street to Fillmore Street
5TH AVENUE VAN BUREN STREET TO MCDOWELL ROAD
5th Street Van Buren Street to 5th Street Crossover
5th Street Crossover 5th Street to Fillmore Street
Page 373
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
7th Avenue Jackson Street to Van Buren Street
7th Avenue Coral Gables Drive to Greenway Parkway
7th Street Jefferson Street to Van Buren Street
11th Avenue Greenway Parkway to Bell Road
11th Street Washington Street to Moreland Street
12th Street Vineyard Road to Southern Avenue
12th Street Moreland Street to Thomas Road
12th Street Osborn Road to Indian School Road
12th Street Bell Road to Agua Fria Freeway
15TH AVENUE HARRISON STREET TO VAN BUREN STREET
15th Avenue Bethany Home Road to Northern Avenue
15th Avenue Hatcher Road to Shangri-La Road
15th Avenue Bell Road to Grovers Avenue
15th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Utopia Road
16th Street Grovers Avenue to Beardsley Road
18th Street Camelback Road to 500 Feet North of Camelback Road
20th Street Dobbins Road to Baseline Road
20th Street Roeser Road to Broadway Road
20th Street Jefferson Street to Roosevelt Street
20th Street McDowell Road to Cambridge Avenue
20th Street Greenfield Road to Highland Avenue
Page 374
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
20th Street Missouri Avenue to Bethany Home Road
21st Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
23rd Avenue Indian School Road to Bethany Home Road
23rd Avenue Orangewood Avenue to Dunlap Avenue
23rd Avenue Acoma Drive to Greenway Road
23rd Avenue Union Hills Drive to Utopia Road
24th Street Shea Boulevard to Sweetwater Avenue
26th Avenue Thunderbird Road to Acoma Drive
26th Street SR-51 to Shea Boulevard
27th Avenue Rose Garden Lane to Deer Valley Drive
27th Drive Carefree Highway to Via Vista
28th Street Cholla Street to Thunderbird Road
28th Street Oak Street to Camelback Road
28th Avenue 29th Avenue to Kelton Lane
29th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Kristal Way
29th Avenue Beardsley Road to Rose Garden Lane
31st Avenue Van Buren Street to Encanto Boulevard
31st Avenue Thomas Road to Grand Avenue
31st Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road
31st Avenue Missouri Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
31st Avenue Northern Avenue to Dunlap Avenue
Page 375
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
31st Avenue Cheryl Drive to Thunderbird Road
31st Avenue Bell Road to Kristal Way
31st Avenue Yorkshire Drive to Beardsley Road
32nd Street 750 Feet South of Beautiful Lane to Baseline Road
32nd Street Deer Valley Road to Sky Crossing Way
32nd Street Puget Avenue to Mountain View Road
33rd Lane North Valley Parkway to Via Del Deserto
35TH AVENUE HAPPY VALLEY ROAD TO 800 FEET NORTH OF HACKAMORE DRIVE
36th Street Ranch Circle North to Suncrest Court
36th Street Roeser Road to Broadway Road
36th Street McDowell Road to Camelback Road
36th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard
36th Street Cactus Road to Greenway Road
39th Avenue Van Buren Street to Osborn Road
39th Avenue Missouri Avenue to Camino Acequia
39th Avenue Peoria Avenue to Cactus Road
39th Avenue Bell Road to Yorkshire Drive
40th Street University Drive to 0.25 Miles North of University Drive
40th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard
44th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard
44th Street Ray Road to Warner-Elliot Loop
Page 376
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
44th Street Paradise Village Parkway North to Bell Road
44th Street Deer Valley Drive to Cashman Drive
45th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
46th Street Paradise Village Parkway North to Thunderbird Road
47th Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road
47th Avenue Thomas Road to Camelback Road
47th Avenue Thunderbird Road to Greenway Road
47th Avenue Acoma Drive to Bell Road
48th Street Pecos Park Entrance to Frye Road
48th Street Elwood Street to University Drive
48th Street Van Buren Street to McDowell Road
48th Street Cholla Street to Paradise Village Parkway South
50th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard
51st Street Elliot Road to Piedmont Road
52nd Place Rancho Paloma Drive to Dove Valley Road
52nd Street Thomas Road to Osborn Road
52nd Street Cholla Street to Cactus Road
52nd Street Thunderbird Road to Bell Road
52nd Street Jomax Road to Pinnacle Vista Drive
53rd Avenue Maryvale Parkway to Indian School Road
55th Avenue McDowell Road to Camelback Road
Page 377
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
55th Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Alameda Road
56TH STREET CAMELBACK ROAD TO ROCKRIDGE ROAD
56th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard
59th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road
60th Street Desert Cove Avenue to Cholla Street Alignment
60th Street Cactus Road to Bell Road
63rd Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Pima Street
63rd Avenue Thomas Road to Osborn Road
63rd Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road
70th Street Princess Drive to Mayo Boulevard
71st Avenue Van Buren Street to Roosevelt Street
71st Avenue McDowell Road to Indian School Road
71st Avenue Campbell Avenue to Camelback Road
71st Drive Indian School Road to Sells Drive
79th Drive Osborn Road to Sells Drive
80th Lane Thomas Road to Osborn Road
93rd Avenue Encanto Boulevard to Thomas Road
103rd Avenue Broadway Road to Country Place Boulevard
103rd Avenue Indian School Road to Campbell Avenue
111th Avenue Campbell Avenue to Camelback Road
Page 378
Table A1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on School
Days.
Cactus Road Westbound 350 Feet +/- East of 37th Avenue and Eastbound 350 Feet +/-
West of 37th Avenue
Ray Road 400 Feet North of Thunderhill Drive to 100 Feet South of Mountain Sky
Avenue
19th Avenue 450 Feet North of Orangewood Avenue to 450 Feet South of Orangewood
Avenue
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Adams Street 27th Avenue to Washington Street
Anthem Way 46th Drive to Black Canyon Freeway
Ball Park Boulevard Camelback Road to Grand Canal
Beardsley Road 20th Street to Cave Creek Road
Bethany Home Road 16th Street to 18th Street
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Madison Street to Van Buren Street
Road
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Interstate 17 Milepost No. 213.34 (North of Bell Road) to
Road (Southbound) Bell Road
Black Mountain Boulevard SR101 to Mayo Boulevard
Black Mountain Boulevard Rancho Paloma Drive to Carefree Highway
Buckeye Road 31st Avenue to 27th Street
Camelback Road 27th Avenue to 28th Street
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 3900 WEST TO 700 FEET EAST OF 33RD AVENUE
Central Avenue Briarwood Terrace to Chandler Boulevard
Page 379
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Central Avenue Mineral Road to Thunderbird Trail
Central Avenue (Southbound) Thunderbird Trail to Dobbins Road
Central Avenue Vineyard Road to Pioneer Street
Central Avenue Watkins Street to Lincoln Street
Central Avenue Roosevelt Street to Mountain View Road
Central Avenue Happy Valley Road to 2,050 Feet +/- North of Happy Valley
Road
Chandler Boulevard Shaughnessey Road to 19th Avenue
Chandler Boulevard (Westbound) 19th Avenue to 15th Avenue
Chandler Boulevard Pecos Road to Shaughnessey Road
Cheryl Drive 35th Avenue to Metro Parkway West
Circle Mountain Road New River Road to Barko Lane
Cotton Center Boulevard 40th Street to 48th Street
DEER VALLEY DRIVE 1,200 FEET WEST OF 35TH AVENUE TO 35TH AVENUE
Desert Foothills Parkway Chandler Boulevard to 5th Avenue
Desert Willow Parkway East 31000 North Cave Creek Road (East Side) to 5000 East
Dixileta Drive
Dobbins Road Central Avenue to 16th Street
Dove Valley Road North Valley Parkway to 16th Avenue
Dunlap Avenue 7th Avenue to 7th Street
Encanto Boulevard 83rd Avenue to 75th Avenue
Frye Road 3rd Street to Desert Foothills Parkway
Page 380
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Galvin Parkway North of Traffic Circle at Botanical Garden Entry to
McDowell Road
GRAND AVENUE 18TH AVENUE to 15TH AVENUE
Grant Street Black Canyon Freeway to Lincoln Street
Grant Street 16th Street to Sky Harbor Circle
Greenway Road Cave Creek Road to Greenway Parkway
Guadalupe Road 48th Street to Interstate 10
Happy Valley Road 29th Avenue to 23rd Avenue
Hatcher Road 19th Avenue to Central Avenue
Holmes Boulevard Bell Road to Grovers Avenue
Indian School Road 27th Avenue to 20th Street
Indian School Road 45th Street to 48th Street
Jefferson Street 23rd Avenue to 7th Avenue
Jefferson Street 7th Street to Washington Street
Jefferson Street 7th Street to 265 Feet +/- East of 26th Street (except
frontage road which is 25 mph)
Jomax Road Cave Creek Road to Tatum Boulevard
Jomax Road Tatum Boulevard to 52nd Street
Knox Road 36th Street to 48th Street
Lafayette Boulevard 44th Street to 64th Street
Liberty Lane 17th Avenue to Central Avenue
Liberty Lane Desert Foothills Parkway to 13th Way
Page 381
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Lincoln Street Grant Street to 7th Street
Lone Mountain Road 40th Street to Cave Creek Road
Lower Buckeye Road 300 Feet West to 300 Feet East of 99th Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 22nd Avenue to 19th Avenue
Maryland Avenue 19th Avenue to 16th Street
Maryvale Parkway Indian School Road to 51st Avenue
McDowell Road 27th Avenue to 32nd Street
Metro Parkway Entire Street Surrounding Metro Center
Missouri Avenue 19th Avenue to 24th Street
Mohave Street 7th Street to Sky Harbor Circle
Mohave Street 22nd Street to 24th Street
Mountain View Road Central Avenue to 12th Street
Norterra Parkway Happy Valley Road to Jomax Road
Oak Street 24th Street to 32nd Street
Oak Street 52nd Street to 56th Street
Osborn Road 19th Avenue to 36th Street
Paloma Parkway Bronco Butte Trail to Dove Valley Road
Paradise Village Parkway Entire Street Surrounding Paradise Village
Peoria Avenue 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Pinnacle Peak Road 19th Avenue to 7th Street
POCONO WAY 800 FEET NORTH OF HACKAMORE DRIVE TO 33RD AVENUE
Page 382
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Pointe Golf Club Drive Thunderbird Road to Sharon Drive
Princess Drive 68th Street to Scottsdale Road
Pyramid Peak Parkway 1,900 Feet +/- North of Brookhart Way to City Limits
(Northbound)
Ranch Circle North Ray Road (3600 East) to Ray Road (4300 East)
Ranch Circle South Ray Road to Mountain Parkway
Rancho Paloma Drive Black Mountain Boulevard to 56th Street
Roeser Road Central Avenue to 40th Street
Roosevelt Street 16th Street to 32nd Street
Rose Garden Lane 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Shea Boulevard 24th Street to 32nd Street
Sky Harbor Circle 22nd Street to Grant Street, Mohave Street to Grant Street,
and Mohave Street to 22nd Street
Southern Avenue 7th Avenue to 7th Street
Sweetwater Avenue Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street
Tatum Boulevard 40th Street to Cave Creek Road
Thistle Landing Drive 48th Street to 50th Street
Thomas Road 27th Avenue to 32nd Street
Thunderbird Road 32nd Street to 38th Place
Tombstone Trail Norterra Parkway to 21st Avenue
University Drive 16th Street to 24th Street
Utopia Road Black Canyon Freeway to 23rd Avenue
Page 383
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Utopia Road Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street
Van Buren Street 35th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Van Buren Street 16th Street to 44th Street
Washington Street Adams Street to 7th Avenue
Washington Street 7th Street to 24th Street (except frontage road which is 25
mph)
Williams Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue
Yorkshire Drive 43rd Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway
1st Avenue Crossover Grant Street to Hadley Street
3rd Avenue Osborn Road to Indian School Road
3rd Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard
3rd Street Fillmore Street to Indian School Road
4th Street 5th Street Crossover to Roosevelt Street
5th Avenue Desert Foothills Parkway to Chandler Boulevard
5th Street Crossover Fillmore Street to 4th Street
7th Avenue Dobbins Road to Baseline Road
7th Avenue Magnolia Street to Jackson Street
7th Avenue Van Buren Street to Missouri Avenue
7th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Hatcher Road
7TH AVENUE CINNABAR AVENUE TO PEORIA AVENUE
7th Avenue Greenway Parkway to Bell Road
7th Street Mineral Road to Baseline Road
Page 384
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
7th Street Lincoln Street to Jefferson Street
7th Street Van Buren Street to Missouri Avenue
7th Street Butler Drive to Cinnabar Avenue
12th Street Indian School Road to Mountain View Road
15th Avenue Southern Avenue to Broadway Road
15th AVENUE 0.25 MILES SOUTH OF MAGNOLIA STREET TO BETHANY
HOME ROAD
15TH AVENUE VAN BUREN STREET TO BETHANY HOME ROAD
16th Street Dobbins Road to Baseline Road
16th Street Maricopa Freeway to Bethany Home Road
16th Street Bell Road to Grovers Avenue
17th Avenue Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard
17th Avenue Buckeye Road to Grant Street
19th Avenue Buckeye Road to the Grand Canal
19th Avenue Glendale Avenue to Northern Avenue (Except where noted
in subsection A.1 of this section)
20th Street Highland Avenue to Missouri Avenue
21st Avenue Jomax Road to Tombstone Trail
23rd Avenue Bethany Home Road to Glendale Avenue
23rd Avenue Mountain View Road to Cactus Road
23rd Avenue Utopia Road to Deer Valley Drive
23rd Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road
Page 385
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
24th Street South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road
24th Street Buckeye Road to Indian School Road
25th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Peoria Avenue
27th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road
27th Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Van Buren Street
27th Avenue Northern Avenue to Dunlap Avenue
27th Avenue Grovers Avenue to Union Hills Drive
27th Avenue Yorkshire Drive to Rose Garden Lane
27th Drive North Valley Parkway to Carefree Highway
28th Drive Peoria Avenue to Cactus Road
29th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Metro Parkway
29th Avenue Greenway Road to Bell Road
32nd Street Air Lane to Van Buren Street
32nd Street Chandler Boulevard to Pecos Road
33RD AVENUE POCONO WAY TO PINNACLE VISTA DRIVE
35th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road
35th Avenue Van Buren Street to Encanto Boulevard
35th AVENUE HAPPY VALLEY ROAD TO 800 FEET NORTH OF HACKAMORE
DRIVE
36th Street Shea Boulevard to Cactus Road
39th Drive Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road
40th Street 0.39 miles South of Air Lane to Washington Street
Page 386
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
40th Street McDowell Road to Missouri Avenue
40th Street (Southbound) Shea Boulevard to Mercer Lane
40th Street Potter Drive to Deer Valley Drive
40th Street Tatum Boulevard to Lone Mountain Road
43rd Avenue Olney Avenue to Dobbins Road
43rd Avenue Elwood Street Alignment to Lower Buckeye Road
43rd Avenue Anthem Way to 1,930 Feet North of Anthem Way
44th Street Campbell Avenue to Calle Feliz
44th Place Cotton Center Boulevard to Broadway Road
48th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard
48th Street Washington Street to Van Buren Street
48th Street Piedmont Road to Guadalupe Road
50th Street Chandler Boulevard to Ray Road
51st Street 500 Feet South of Elliot Road to Warner-Elliot Loop
52nd Street McDowell Road to Thomas Road
52nd Street Cactus Road to Thunderbird Road
55th Avenue Alameda Road to Happy Valley Road
56th Street South City Limit to Van Buren Street
56th Street Oak Street to Camelback Road
56th Street Bell Road to Central Arizona Project Canal
56th Street Lone Mountain Road to Rancho Paloma Drive
Page 387
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
64th Street Oak Street to McDowell Road (Southbound Only)
64th Street 255 Feet North of Hillcrest Boulevard to Chaparral Road
68th Street Princess Drive to Mayo Boulevard
71st Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road
107th Avenue Camelback Road to Missouri Avenue
Table B1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on School Days.
Dunlap Avenue For Westbound, 650 Feet +/- West of 29th Avenue to 625 +/- West of
35th Avenue
Dunlap Avenue For Eastbound, 545 Feet +/- West of 35th Avenue to 30th Avenue
Table B2. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on School Days.
Greenway Parkway 400 Feet West of 7th Avenue to 250 Feet East of 5th Avenue
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Air Lane 24th Street to 32nd Street
BASELINE ROAD 51ST AVENUE TO 35TH AVENUE
BASELINE ROAD 43RD AVENUE TO 35TH AVENUE
Baseline Road 7th Avenue to 7th Street
Beardsley Road (Eastbound 37th Avenue to 27th Avenue
Frontage)
Beardsley Road Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street
Bell Road 19th Avenue to 12th Street
Page 388
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Bell Road 0.25 miles West of Cave Creek Road to 1,500 Feet East of
40th Street
Bethany Home Road 43rd Avenue to 16th Street
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Maricopa Freeway to Madison Street
Roads
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Thomas Road to Cactus Road
Road (Northbound)
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
Road (Northbound)
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Mountain View Road (Alignment) to Thomas Road
Road (Southbound)
Black Mountain Boulevard Mayo Boulevard to Pinnacle Peak Road
Broadway Road 19th Avenue to 32nd Street
Buckeye Road 39th Avenue to 31st Avenue
Cactus Road 39th Avenue to 350 Feet West of 37th Avenue
Cactus Road 350 Feet East of 37th Avenue to 19th Avenue
Cactus Road Cave Creek Road to 60th Street
Camelback Road 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue
Camelback Road 28th Street to 64th Street
Cave Creek Road Dunlap Avenue to Peoria Avenue
Cave Creek Road Marco Polo Road to Rose Garden Lane
Central Avenue (Northbound) Thunderbird Trail to Dobbins Road
Central Avenue Dobbins Road to Vineyard Road
Central Avenue Pioneer Street to Watkins Street
Page 389
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Chandler Boulevard Marketplace Way to 34th Street
Deer Valley Drive 600 Feet West of 27th Avenue to 0.25 Miles East of 19th
Avenue
Deer Valley Drive 600 Feet West of 16th Street to 56th Street
Desert Foothills Parkway Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard
Desert Peak Parkway Lieber Place to Cave Creek Road
Dobbins Road From West City Limit to 1,320 Feet +/- East
Dobbins Road 23rd Avenue to Central Avenue
Dunlap Avenue 43rd Avenue to 7th Avenue (Except where noted in Table
B1 of this section)
Durango Street 35th Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway
Elliot Road 2,085 Feet +/- West of 59th Avenue to 51st Avenue
Elliot Road 46th Street to 51st Street
Elwood Street 7th Street to 16th Street
Galvin Parkway Van Buren Street to 100 Feet +/- North of East Papago Park
(Zoo Entrance)
Gavilan Peak Parkway 800 Feet +/- West of 33rd Lane to Cloud Road
Glendale Avenue 43rd Avenue to 21st Street
GRAND AVENUE 21ST AVENUE TO 19TH AVENUE
Greenway Parkway 500 Feet West of 7th Avenue to 3rd Avenue (Except where
noted in Table B2 of this section)
Greenway Parkway Cave Creek Road to Greenway Road
Greenway Road 51st Avenue to 19th Avenue
Page 390
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Greenway Road Greenway Parkway to 300 Feet East of 30th Street
Greenway Road 52nd Street to 500 Feet East of 60th Street
Indian School Road 67th Avenue to 27th Avenue
Indian School Road 20th Street to 45th Street
Indian School Road 48th Street to 60th Street
Jomax Road Black Canyon Freeway to Norterra Parkway
Liberty Lane 13th Way to 24th Street
Lincoln Drive 21st Street to 800 Feet East of Ocotillo Road
Lower Buckeye Road 103rd Avenue to 300 Feet +/- West of 99th Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 300 Feet +/- East of 99th Avenue to 95th Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 27th Avenue to 22nd Avenue
Maricopa Freeway Frontage Roads 23rd Avenue to 16th Street
Mayo Boulevard Black Mountain Boulevard to 40th Street
McDowell Road 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue
McDowell Road 32nd Street to 52nd Street
Mountain Parkway Chandler Boulevard to Ray Road
Norterra Parkway Jomax Road to North Valley Parkway
Northern Avenue 43rd Avenue to SR-51
North Valley Parkway Jomax Road to 30th Avenue
North Valley Parkway 800 Feet +/- West of 33rd Lane to 33rd Lane
Peoria Avenue 43rd Avenue to 19th Avenue
Page 391
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Pyramid Peak Parkway 67th Avenue to City Limits
(Southbound)
Pyramid Peak Parkway 67th Avenue to 1,900 Feet +/- North of Brookhart Way
(Northbound)
Ray Road Chandler Boulevard to Interstate 10 (Except where noted in
Table A1 of this section)
Rose Garden Lane Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street
Shea Boulevard 32nd Street to 450 Feet East of 40th Street
Southern Avenue 39th Avenue to 31st Avenue
Southern Avenue 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Southern Avenue 7th Street to 24th Street
Thomas Road 800 Feet West of 59th Avenue to Grand Avenue
Thomas Road 32nd Street to 56th Street
Thunderbird Road 31st Avenue to Coral Gables Drive
Thunderbird Road 38th Place to Scottsdale Road
Union Hills Drive 27th Avenue to 19th Avenue
Union Hills Drive 7th Street to 20th Street
University Drive Wood Street to 48th Street
Van Buren Street 67th Avenue to 200 Feet West of 63rd Avenue
Van Buren Street 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue
Van Buren Street 44th Street to 56th Street
Warner-Elliot Loop 4600 East Elliot Road to 578 Feet East of Wakial Loop
Washington Street 24th Street to 34th Street
Page 392
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
7th Avenue Baseline Road to Magnolia Street
7th Avenue Missouri Avenue to Dunlap Avenue
7th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
7th Avenue Rose Garden Lane to Deer Valley Drive
7th Street Baseline Road to Lincoln Street
7th Street Missouri Avenue to Butler Drive
7th Street Cinnabar Avenue to 400 Feet North of Peoria Avenue
7th Street Thunderbird Road to 600 Feet North of Bell Road
16th Street Baseline Road to the Maricopa Freeway
16th Street Bethany Home Road to Northern Avenue
19th Avenue Southern Avenue to Buckeye Road
19th Avenue Grand Canal to Glendale Avenue
19th Avenue Northern Avenue to Evans Drive
24th Street Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard
24th Street Baseline Road to Buckeye Road
24th Street Indian School Road to Montebello Avenue
27th Avenue Baseline Road to 500 Feet +/- North
27th Avenue Van Buren Street to Northern Avenue
32nd Street Baseline Road to Wood Street
32nd Street Van Buren Street to the Arizona Canal
32nd Street Mountain View Road to Bell Road
Page 393
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
32nd Street Beardsley Road to Rose Garden Lane
35th Avenue Dobbins Road to South Mountain Avenue
35th Avenue Baseline Road to Broadway Road
35th Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Van Buren Street
35th Avenue Encanto Boulevard to Bell Road
35th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Beardsley Road
40th Street Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard
40th Street 800 Feet South of Roeser Road to University Drive
40th Street Washington Street to McDowell Road
40th Street (Northbound) Shea Boulevard to Mercer Lane
40th Street Mercer Lane to Union Hills Drive
40th Street Deer Valley Drive to Pinnacle Peak Road
43rd Avenue Buckeye Road to Glendale Avenue
43rd Avenue Thunderbird Road to Beardsley Road
43rd Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road
44th Street Washington Street to Campbell Avenue
44th Street Calle Feliz to McDonald Drive
48th Street Chandler Boulevard to Piedmont Road
51st Avenue 0.5 Miles South of Lower Buckeye Road to Lower Buckeye
Road
51st Avenue Roosevelt Street to Camelback Road
51st Avenue 250 Feet South of Cactus Road to Union Hills Drive
Page 394
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
51st Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road
52nd Street Van Buren Street to McDowell Road
56th Street Shea Boulevard to Bell Road
56th Street Central Arizona Project Canal to Pinnacle Peak Road
59th Avenue Dobbins Road to South Mountain Avenue
59th Avenue Roosevelt Street to Camelback Road
64th Street Cactus Road to Bell Road
67th Avenue 400 Feet +/- South of Elwood Street to Camelback Road
67th Avenue Happy Valley Road to Pyramid Peak Parkway
75th Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road
75th Avenue 0.25 Miles South of Thomas Road to Devonshire Avenue
83rd Avenue Van Buren Street to Papago Freeway
91st Avenue McDowell Road to Indian School Road
99th Avenue 0.5 Miles South of Lower Buckeye Road to Durango Street
107th Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
BASELINE ROAD 55TH AVENUE TO 51ST AVENUE
BASELINE ROAD 55TH AVENUE TO 43RD AVENUE
BASELINE ROAD 35th AVENUE TO 7TH AVENUE
Baseline Road 7th Street to 48th Street
Page 395
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Beardsley Road (Frontage Roads) 27th Avenue to 20th Street
Beardsley Road Frontage Road 27th Avenue to 51st Avenue
(Westbound)
Beardsley Road Frontage Road 51st Avenue to 37th Avenue
(Eastbound)
Bell Road 51st Avenue to 19th Avenue
Bell Road 12th Street to 0.25 Miles West of Cave Creek Road
Bell Road 1,500 Feet East of 40th Street to Scottsdale Road
Black Canyon Frontage Road Van Buren Street to Thomas Road
Black Canyon Frontage Road Cactus Road to Greenway Road
(Northbound)
Black Canyon Frontage Road Union Hills Drive to MP 213.34 (North of Bell Road)
(Southbound)
Black Canyon Frontage Road Bell Road to Mountain View Road Frontage Road (Alignment)
(Southbound)
Broadway Road 107th Avenue to 99th Avenue
Broadway Road 27th Avenue to 19th Avenue
Broadway Road 32nd Street to 48th Street
Buckeye Road 71st Avenue to 39th Avenue
Cactus Road 51st Avenue to 39th Avenue
Camelback Road 113th Avenue to 99th Avenue
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 4700 WEST TO 3900 WEST
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 700 FEET EAST OF 33RD AVENUE TO 0.5 MILES EAST OF VIA
TRAMONTO
Page 396
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
CAREFREE HIGHWAY VIA PUZZOLA DRIVE TO 0.5 MILES EAST OF PALOMA
PARKWAY
Cave Creek Road Peoria Avenue to Marco Polo Road
Cave Creek Road Rose Garden Lane to Pinnacle Peak Road
Cave Creek Road (Southbound) Pinnacle Peak to 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane
Cave Creek Road Peak View Road to Westland Road
Chandler Boulevard (Eastbound) 19th Avenue to 15th Avenue
Chandler Boulevard 15th Avenue to Marketplace Way
Chandler Boulevard 34th Street to Interstate 10
Deer Valley Drive 35th Avenue to 600 Feet West of 27th Avenue
Deer Valley Drive 0.25 Miles East of 19th Avenue to 600 Feet West of 16th
Street
Dixileta Drive Tatum Boulevard to 52nd Street
Dobbins Road 1,320 Feet +/- East of City Limit to 200 Feet +/- West of 56th
Glen
Dobbins Road 0.25 Miles West of 35th Avenue to 33rd Avenue
Dobbins Road 27th Avenue to 23rd Avenue
Dove Valley Road 16th Avenue to Sonoran Desert Drive
Dynamite Boulevard Cave Creek Road to 40th Street
GRAND AVENUE 43RD AVENUE TO 21ST AVENUE
Greenway Parkway 17th Drive to 500 Feet West of 7th Avenue
Greenway Parkway 3rd Avenue to Cave Creek Road
Greenway Road 19th Avenue to 17th Drive
Page 397
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Greenway Road 300 Feet East of 30th Street to 52nd Street
Greenway Road 500 Feet East of 60th Street to Scottsdale Road
Happy Valley Road 67th Avenue to 29th Avenue
Happy Valley Road 23rd Avenue to 7th Street
Indian School Road 99th Avenue to 67th Avenue
Jomax Road Norterra Parkway to 19th Avenue
Lincoln Drive 800 Feet East of Ocotillo Road to 32nd Street
Lone Mountain Road 56th Street to 63rd Street
Lower Buckeye Road 95th Avenue to 83rd Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 79th Avenue to 75th Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 67th Avenue to 27th Avenue
Mayo Boulevard Tatum Boulevard to Scottsdale Road
McDowell Road 83rd Avenue to 43rd Avenue
McDowell Road 52nd Street to 1,350 Feet East of 52nd Street
McDowell Road 1,575 Feet West of Galvin Parkway to 64th Street
New River Road 1.0 Mile Southwest of Black Canyon Freeway to Black Canyon
Freeway
Pinnacle Peak Road 55th Avenue to 19th Avenue
Pinnacle Peak Road Cave Creek Road to Tatum Boulevard
Shea Boulevard 450 Feet East of 40th Street to 64th Street
Sonoran Desert Drive Dove Valley Road to Cave Creek Road
Southern Avenue 59th Avenue to 51st Avenue
Page 398
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Southern Avenue 31st Avenue to 19th Avenue
Southern Avenue 24th Street to 48th Street
Tatum Boulevard Mockingbird Lane to Pinnacle Peak Road
Tatum Boulevard Prickly Pear Trail to Cave Creek Road
Thomas Road 99th Avenue to 800 Feet West of 59th Avenue
Thunderbird Road 51st Avenue to 31st Avenue
Thunderbird Road Coral Gables Drive to 1,400 Feet East of 7th Street
Thunderbird Road 18th Street to Cave Creek Road
Union Hills Drive 51st Avenue to 27th Avenue
Union Hills Drive 19th Avenue to 7th Street
Union Hills Drive 20th Street to Tatum Boulevard
Van Buren Street 83rd Avenue to 67th Avenue
Van Buren Street 200 Feet West of 63rd Avenue to 39th Avenue
Van Buren Street 56th Street to 508 Feet East of Project Drive
Washington Street 34th Street to 56th Street
7th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Rose Garden Lane
7th Street 400 Feet North of Peoria Avenue to Thunderbird Road
7th Street 600 Feet North of Bell Road to Happy Valley Road
19th Avenue Dobbins Road to Southern Avenue
19th Avenue Evans Drive to Jomax Road
24th Street Baseline Road to Roeser Road
Page 399
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
24th Street Montebello Avenue to Lincoln Drive
27th Avenue Southern Avenue to Broadway Road
29th Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road
32nd Street Arizona Canal to Lincoln Drive
32nd Street Bell Road to Beardsley Road
35th Avenue 200 Feet South of Elliot Road to Dobbins Road
35th Avenue Baseline Road to 500 Feet +/- North
35th Avenue Broadway Road to Lower Buckeye Road
35th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
35th Avenue Beardsley Road to Pinnacle Peak Road
40th Street Baseline Road to 800 Feet South of Roeser Road
43rd Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Southern Avenue
43rd Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Buckeye Road
43rd Avenue Glendale Avenue to Thunderbird Road
48th Street Baseline Road to Southern Avenue
51st Avenue Dobbins Road to Baseline Road
51st Avenue Baseline Road to Roosevelt Street
51st Avenue Union Hills Drive to Beardsley Road
59th Avenue Elliot Road to Dobbins Road
59th Avenue Buckeye Road to Roosevelt Street
75th Avenue Broadway Road to Van Buren Street
Page 400
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
75th Avenue Roosevelt Street 0.25 miles South of Thomas Road
75th Avenue Devonshire Avenue to Camelback Road
83RD AVENUE BROADWAY ROAD TO ELWOOD STREET
83RD AVENUE BROADWAY ROAD TO BUCKEYE ROAD
83rd Avenue Papago Freeway to Camelback Road
91st Avenue Elwood Street to Buckeye Road
91st Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road
99th Avenue Durango Street to Buckeye Road
Table E. Prima Facie Speed Limit 50 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Greenway Road to Bell Road
Road (Northbound)
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Union Hills Drive to Pinnacle Peak Road
Road
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Happy Valley Road to Interstate 17 Mile Post No. 220.82 (South
Roads of Dixileta Drive Alignment)
Broadway Road 99th Avenue to 91st Avenue
Buckeye Road 75th Avenue to 71st Avenue
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 0.5 MILES EAST OF PALOMA PARKWAY TO 7TH AVENUE
Cave Creek Road (Northbound) Pinnacle Peak Road to 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane
Cave Creek Road 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane to Peak View Road
Page 401
Table E. Prima Facie Speed Limit 50 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Dobbins Road 43rd Avenue to 0.25 Miles West of 35th Avenue
El Mirage Road 0.25 Miles South of Camelback Road to 0.50 Miles North of Camelback
Road
Lower Buckeye Road 107th Avenue to 103rd Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 83rd Avenue to 79th Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 75th Avenue to 71st Avenue
McDowell Road 1,350 Feet East of 52nd Street to 1,575 Feet West of Galvin Parkway
New River Road Cloud Road to 1.0 Mile Southwest of Black Canyon Freeway
Pinnacle Peak Road Tatum Boulevard to Scottsdale Road
Tatum Boulevard Pinnacle Peak Road to Prickly Pear Trail
Thunderbird Road 1,400 Feet East of 7th Street to 18th Street
51st Avenue Estrella Drive to Olney Avenue
59th Avenue Broadway Road to Durango Street Alignment
75th Avenue Van Buren Street to Roosevelt Street
83RD AVENUE ELWOOD STREET TO BUCKEYE ROAD
91st Avenue 1.56 Miles South of Broadway Road to 0.5 Miles South of Broadway
Road
99th Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road
99th Avenue 0.25 Miles North of Broadway Road to 0.5 Miles South of Lower
Buckeye Road
Table F. Prima Facie Speed Limit 55 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 6600 WEST TO 4700 WEST
Page 402
Table F. Prima Facie Speed Limit 55 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 1,200 FEET EAST OF 33RD AVENUE TO 0.5 MILES EAST OF VIA
TRAMANTO
G. Parks.
1. North Mountain Park.
a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
North Mountain Park Entire Length
Drive
2. Papago Park.
a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
All roadways except Galvin Parkway.
3. Pecos Park.
a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
All roadways within park boundary.
4. South Mountain Park.
a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
All roadways within park boundary.
5. Piestewa Peak Park.
a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Piestewa Peak Drive Piestewa Peak Park Boundary to End of Road Within Piestewa
Peak Park
H. Sky Harbor Airport.
1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 15 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Sky Harbor Boulevard (North and Between Terminal Curb and Sky Harbor Boulevard
Page 403
South Roadway) Median on All Terminals 2 and 3 and on Level 1 of
Terminal 4
Sky Harbor Boulevard (North and All Ticketing/Check-in Lanes on Level 2 of Terminal 4
South Roadway)
2. Prima Facie Speed Limit 20 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Sky Harbor Boulevard 4,400 Feet East of 24th Street to 6,300 Feet East of 24th Street
(South Roadway)
3. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Sky Harbor Boulevard All Ramps, Entries and Exits for All Ticketing/Check-in and Baggage
(North and South Claim Lanes at Terminals 3 and 4
Roadway)
4. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Sky Harbor Boulevard 3,000 Feet East of 24th Street to 4,400 Feet East of 24th Street
(South Roadway)
5. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Sky Harbor Boulevard Between 24th Street and SR 143, Except as Provided in the Prior
(North and South Subsections
Roadway)
Page 404
Report
Locations (Ordinance G-6997)
Request to amend Phoenix City Code, Section 36-158, Schedule I, Local Speed Limits
at 27 locations due to record keeping and local speed limit changes.
Summary
Speed limits are established under Arizona Revised Statutes, section 28-703, which
requires an “engineering study and traffic investigation.” The Phoenix City Code and
Charter require that all local speed limits on City streets be approved by City Council in
the form of an amendment to Phoenix City Code.
The Street Transportation Department (Streets) is recommending 26 record keeping
updates and one speed limit change for the 27 locations listed in Attachment A and
adoption of recommended changes to Phoenix City Code, Section 36-158, Schedule I,
Local Speed Limits in Attachment B. Streets staff has conducted a comprehensive
review of the speed limit ordinance and has noted locations where speed limits posted
on City streets do not match the speed limits included in the current ordinance. In
addition to these record keeping changes, there are streets or street segments that are
being removed from the ordinance as they are either private or no longer part of the
City’s street network. As with all recommended speed limit changes, they are based on
traffic investigations conducted with the engineering judgment of Streets staff.
Streets actively and regularly reviews posted speed limits and reconciles any
discrepancies with the ordinance. Field reviews are typically conducted by Streets
Traffic Services Investigations team, but most recently this effort has been supported
by the Universal Right-of-Way Inspections team. Field reviews over the last year have
been completed for over 700 street segments. In April 2021, findings and corrections
from approximately half of the reviews conducted were presented to City Council and
adopted. This update includes findings and corrections from the second half of the
reviews conducted.
This item was previously recommended for Council approval by the Transportation,
Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee on April 20, 2022. However, following that
action, Streets staff since discovered that the current speed limit ordinance last
Page 362
approved by City Council on April 21, 2021 (Ordinance G-6839) does not accurately
reflect all speed limit ordinance updates previously approved by City Council over the
last few years. In response, Streets staff conducted a review and made necessary
adjustments to ensure that Attachment B includes the 27 current updates, as well as
the ordinance updates previously approved by Council in 2020 and 2021.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item:
· On April 20, 2022, by a vote of 3-0; and
· On June 15, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 363
ATTACHMENT A
SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN CITY OF PHOENIX SPEED LIMITS
AMENDING SECTION 36-158, SCHEDULE I - LOCAL SPEED LIMITS
Locations to be removed from ordinance not within Phoenix right-of-way
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Remove
Carefree Highway 6600 West to 4700 West from ordinance. Outside of N/A
Phoenix boundary.
Record keeping. Remove
Carefree Highway 4700 West to 3900 West from ordinance. Outside N/A
Phoenix boundary.
Record keeping. Remove
3900 West to 700 Feet East
Carefree Highway from ordinance. Outside of
of 33rd Avenue N/A
Phoenix boundary.
Record keeping. Remove
from ordinance. Arizona
Grand Avenue 43rd Avenue to 21st Avenue 4, 5 and 7
Department of Transportation
roadway.
Record keeping. Remove
from ordinance. Arizona
Grand Avenue 21st Avenue to 19th Avenue 4 and 7
Department of Transportation
roadway.
Record keeping. Remove
Camelback Road to
56th Street from ordinance. Private 6
Rockridge Road
roadway.
Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 mph at all times
Locations to be removed from ordinance
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Remove
from ordinance to align with
Jefferson Street 4th Street to 7th Street 8
the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
Lincoln Drive to Phoenix from ordinance to align with
Piestewa Peak Drive 6
Mountain Preserve Entrance the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
from ordinance to align with
Virginia Avenue 7th Street to 12th Street 4
the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
from ordinance to align with
Washington Street 4th Street to 7th Street 8
the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
Van Buren Street to from ordinance to align with
3rd Avenue 7
McDowell Road the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
Van Buren Street to from ordinance to align with
5th Avenue 7
McDowell Road the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Record keeping. Remove
Cinnabar Avenue to Peoria from ordinance to align with
7th Avenue 3
Avenue the posted speed limit of
25 mph.
Page 364
Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 mph at all times
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Change
1,200 Feet West of 35th
Deer Valley Drive ordinance to align with the 1
Avenue to 35th Avenue
posted speed limit of 30 mph.
Speed limit change. Lower
Grand Avenue 7th Avenue to 15th Avenue ordinance speed limit from 35 7
mph to 30 mph.
Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 mph at all times
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Change
0.25 mile south of Magnolia
15th Avenue ordinance to align with the 7
Street to Bethany Home Rd
posted speed limit of 35 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Happy Valley to 800 Feet
35th Avenue ordinance to align with the 1
north of Hackamore Dr
posted speed limit of 35 mph.
Record keeping. Change
800 feet north of Hackamore
Pocono Way ordinance to align with the 1
Drive to 33rd Avenue
posted speed limit of 35 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Pocono Way to Pinnacle
33rd Avenue ordinance to align with the 1
Vista Drive
posted speed limit of 30 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Grand Avenue 18th Avenue to 15th Avenue ordinance to align with the 4
posted speed limit of 30 mph.
Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 mph at all times
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Change
Baseline Road 43rd Avenue to 35th Avenue ordinance to align with the 7
posted speed limit of 40 mph.
Record keeping. Change
700 feet west of North Valley
Carefree Highway ordinance to align with the 2
Parkway to Via Puzzola Drive
posted speed limit of 40 mph.
Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 mph at all times
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Change
Baseline Road 55th Avenue to 43rd Avenue ordinance to align with the 7
posted speed limit of 45 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Baseline Road 35th Avenue to 7th Avenue ordinance to align with the 7
posted speed limit of 45 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Via Puzzola Drive to 0.5 miles
Carefree Highway ordinance to align with the 2
east of Paloma Parkway
posted speed limit of 45 mph.
Record keeping. Change
Broadway Road to Buckeye
83rd Avenue ordinance to align with the 7
Road
posted speed limit of 45 mph.
Page 365
Prima Facie Speed Limit 50 mph at all times
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Change
0.5 Miles east of Paloma
Carefree Highway ordinance to align with the 2
Parkway to 7th Avenue
posted speed limit of 50 mph.
Note: All speed limit changes were recommended based on a traffic study and approved by a Traffic Engineer.
Page 366
ATTACHMENT B
ARTICLE XII. PENALTY AND SCHEDULES
36-158 Schedule I—Local speed limits.
It is hereby determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed limit
permitted by state law on the following streets or intersections is greater or less than is reasonable
under existing conditions, and it is hereby declared that the maximum speed limits shall be as
hereinafter set forth on those streets, parts of streets or intersections herein designated at the times
specified when signs are erected giving notice thereof.
The City Traffic Engineer may declare a maximum speed limit that is determined pursuant to this section
to be effective at all times or at such times as indicated on the speed limit signs. The City Traffic
Engineer may establish lower speed limits for different times of day, different types of vehicles, varying
weather conditions, special events, work zones for construction, maintenance or other activity in the
roadway and other factors bearing on safe speeds. The lower limits are effective when posted on
appropriate fixed, variable or portable signs.
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Acoma Drive 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue
Acoma Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 23rd Avenue
Acoma Drive 36th Street to 40th Street
Acoma Drive Tatum Boulevard to 64th Street
Arroyo Norte Drive Northbound I-17 Frontage Road to 3900 West
Beardsley Road 32nd Street to 34th Street
Butler Drive 39th Avenue to 27th Avenue
Butler Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue
Campbell Avenue 71st Avenue to 51st Avenue
Campbell Avenue 113th Avenue to 107th Avenue
Campbell Avenue 35th Avenue to 15th Avenue
Campbell Avenue 12th Street to 16th Street
Page 367
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Campbell Avenue 20th Street to 44th Street
Canterbury Drive Thunderbird Road to Tam-O-Shanter Drive
Cashman Drive Pinnacle Peak Road to 44th Street
Central Avenue Lincoln Street to Madison Street
Central Avenue Grovers Avenue to Union Hills Drive
Chauncey Lane 68th Street to Scottsdale Road
Cholla Street 24th Street to 56th Street
Clarendon Avenue 55th Avenue to Maryvale Parkway
Colter Street 16th Street to SR-51
Copperhead Trail North Valley Parkway to Gambit Trail
Copperhead Trail West of 14th Lane Traffic Circle to Gambit Trail
Coral Gables Drive Thunderbird Road to 7th Street
DEER VALLEY DRIVE 1,200 FEET WEST OF 35TH AVENUE TO 35TH AVENUE
Desert Willow Parkway East Dixileta Drive to Dynamite Boulevard
Desert Willow Parkway 30200 North Cave Creek Road to 31000 North Cave Creek Road
West
Dove Valley Road 52nd Place to 56th Street
Dunlap Avenue 7th Street to 12th Street
Durango Street 67th Avenue to 63rd Avenue
Elwood Street 40th Street to 48th Street
Encanto Boulevard 93rd Avenue to 91st Avenue
Page 368
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Encanto Boulevard 75th Avenue to 73rd Avenue
Encanto Boulevard 71st Avenue to 51st Avenue
Encanto Boulevard 49th Avenue to 31st Avenue
Encanto Boulevard Grand Avenue to 19th Avenue
Freemont Road Rough Rider Road to Cashman Drive
Galvin Parkway 100 Feet +/- North of East Papago Park to Traffic Circle at Botanical
Garden Entrance
GRAND AVENUE 7TH AVENUE TO 15TH AVENUE
Greenway Road 20th Street to Cave Creek Road
Grovers Avenue 51st Avenue to 27th Avenue
Grovers Avenue Central Avenue to Cave Creek Road
Hatcher Road Central Avenue to 12th Street
Highland Avenue Campbell Avenue to 107th Avenue
Highland Avenue 16th Street to 24th Street
Illini Street 30th Street to Riverpoint Parkway
Jefferson Street 27th Avenue to 23rd Avenue
Jefferson Street 7th Avenue to 4th Avenue
JEFFERSON STREET 4TH STREET TO 7TH STREET
Jesse Owens Parkway Central Avenue to 7th Street
Jones Avenue 103rd Avenue to 99th Avenue
Kelton Lane 29th Avenue to 28th Avenue
Page 369
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Knox Road Warpaint Drive to 36th Street
Lakewood Parkway West 3300 East to 3600 East to 17000 South to 15800 South
Lakewood Parkway East 3600 East to 3800 East to 17000 South to 15800 South
Lindner Drive (West 45th Avenue to Augusta North
Section)
Lindner Drive (East 45th Avenue to Grovers Avenue
Section)
Lockwood Drive Freemont Road to Cashman Drive
Marriott Drive Pathfinder Drive to Deer Valley Drive
Maryland Avenue 43rd Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway
Maryvale Parkway 51st Avenue to Indian School Road
Missouri Avenue 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue
Missouri Avenue Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue
Mohave Street 7th Avenue to 7th Street
Morningside Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 21st Avenue
Morten Avenue 16th Street to 1900 East
Mountain View Road 23rd Avenue to 15th Avenue
Mountain View Road 12th Street to 17th Street
Mountain View Road 32nd Street to 36th Street
Northern Avenue 26th Street to 32nd Street
North Valley Parkway Carefree Highway to 33rd Lane
Oak Street 16th Street to 24th Street
Page 370
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Oak Street 32nd Street to 44th Street
Oak Street 48th Street to 52nd Street
Oak Street (Eastbound) 56th Street to 64th Street
Olympic Drive Central Avenue to Jesse Owens Parkway
Orangewood Avenue 43rd Avenue to 19th Avenue
Osborn Road 83rd Avenue to 75th Avenue
Osborn Road 73rd Avenue to Grand Avenue
Osborn Road Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue
Osborn Road 40th Street to 56th Street
Paradise Lane 7th Street to 16th Street
Paradise Lane Tatum Boulevard to 56th Street
Paradise Lane 47th Avenue to 43rd Avenue
Pathfinder Drive 44th Street to Marriott Drive
Piedmont Road 48th Street to 51st Street
Pinnacle Vista Drive Pyramid Peak Parkway to Inspiration Mountain Parkway
Pinnacle Vista Drive 52nd Street to 56th Street
Quail Track Drive North Valley Parkway to Copperhead Trail
Ranger Drive Tatum Boulevard to 55th Street
Riverpoint Parkway Wood Street to Illini Street
Roeser Road 7th Avenue to Central Avenue
Roeser Road 40th Street to 48th Street
Page 371
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Roosevelt Street 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue
Roosevelt Street 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue
Roosevelt Street 33rd Avenue to 27th Avenue
Roosevelt Street 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Roosevelt Street Central Avenue to 16th Street
Rose Garden Lane 29th Avenue to 19th Avenue
Rough Rider Road Aviano Way to 40th Street
Sells Drive 79th Drive to 71st Drive
Sky Crossing Way Deer Valley Road to 33rd Street
SQUAW PEAK DRIVE LINCOLN DRIVE TO SQUAW PEAK PARK BOUNDARY
SR-51 (East Access Road) 500 Feet North of Camelback Road to Colter Street
Stanford Drive 40th Street to 44th Street
Stetson Hills Loop 43rd Avenue to 39th Drive
Sweetwater Avenue 51st Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway
Sweetwater Avenue 32nd Street to 42nd Street
Sweetwater Avenue Paradise Valley Parkway East to Scottsdale Road
Thunderbird Road 28th Street to 32nd Street
Trailblazer Drive 44th Street to Tatum Boulevard
University Drive 24th Street to Magnolia Street (2700 East)
Utopia Road 23rd Avenue to 19th Avenue
Van Buren Street 7th Street to 16th Street
Page 372
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Via Del Deserto 33rd Lane to Via Puzzola
Via Puzzola Carefree Highway to Cloud Road
Via Tramonto Carefree Highway to Via Vista
Via Vista 27th Avenue to Via Tramonto
Vineyard Road 47th Avenue to 43rd Avenue
Virginia Avenue 35th Avenue to 27th Avenue
VIRGINIA AVENUE CENTRAL AVENUE TO 12TH STREET
VIRGINA AVENUE CENTRAL AVENUE TO 7TH STREET
Warpaint Drive Knox Road to Coconino Street
Washington Street 7th Avenue to 4th Avenue
WASHINGTON STREET 4TH STREET TO 7TH STREET
Wier Avenue 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue
Winchcomb Drive 26th Avenue to Acoma Drive (2300 West)
Wood Street Riverpoint Parkway to University Drive
1st Avenue Grant Street to Roosevelt Street
3RD AVENUE VAN BUREN STREET TO MCDOWELL ROAD
3rd Avenue Thomas Road to Osborn Road
3rd Street Monroe Street to Fillmore Street
5TH AVENUE VAN BUREN STREET TO MCDOWELL ROAD
5th Street Van Buren Street to 5th Street Crossover
5th Street Crossover 5th Street to Fillmore Street
Page 373
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
7th Avenue Jackson Street to Van Buren Street
7th Avenue Coral Gables Drive to Greenway Parkway
7th Street Jefferson Street to Van Buren Street
11th Avenue Greenway Parkway to Bell Road
11th Street Washington Street to Moreland Street
12th Street Vineyard Road to Southern Avenue
12th Street Moreland Street to Thomas Road
12th Street Osborn Road to Indian School Road
12th Street Bell Road to Agua Fria Freeway
15TH AVENUE HARRISON STREET TO VAN BUREN STREET
15th Avenue Bethany Home Road to Northern Avenue
15th Avenue Hatcher Road to Shangri-La Road
15th Avenue Bell Road to Grovers Avenue
15th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Utopia Road
16th Street Grovers Avenue to Beardsley Road
18th Street Camelback Road to 500 Feet North of Camelback Road
20th Street Dobbins Road to Baseline Road
20th Street Roeser Road to Broadway Road
20th Street Jefferson Street to Roosevelt Street
20th Street McDowell Road to Cambridge Avenue
20th Street Greenfield Road to Highland Avenue
Page 374
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
20th Street Missouri Avenue to Bethany Home Road
21st Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
23rd Avenue Indian School Road to Bethany Home Road
23rd Avenue Orangewood Avenue to Dunlap Avenue
23rd Avenue Acoma Drive to Greenway Road
23rd Avenue Union Hills Drive to Utopia Road
24th Street Shea Boulevard to Sweetwater Avenue
26th Avenue Thunderbird Road to Acoma Drive
26th Street SR-51 to Shea Boulevard
27th Avenue Rose Garden Lane to Deer Valley Drive
27th Drive Carefree Highway to Via Vista
28th Street Cholla Street to Thunderbird Road
28th Street Oak Street to Camelback Road
28th Avenue 29th Avenue to Kelton Lane
29th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Kristal Way
29th Avenue Beardsley Road to Rose Garden Lane
31st Avenue Van Buren Street to Encanto Boulevard
31st Avenue Thomas Road to Grand Avenue
31st Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road
31st Avenue Missouri Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
31st Avenue Northern Avenue to Dunlap Avenue
Page 375
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
31st Avenue Cheryl Drive to Thunderbird Road
31st Avenue Bell Road to Kristal Way
31st Avenue Yorkshire Drive to Beardsley Road
32nd Street 750 Feet South of Beautiful Lane to Baseline Road
32nd Street Deer Valley Road to Sky Crossing Way
32nd Street Puget Avenue to Mountain View Road
33rd Lane North Valley Parkway to Via Del Deserto
35TH AVENUE HAPPY VALLEY ROAD TO 800 FEET NORTH OF HACKAMORE DRIVE
36th Street Ranch Circle North to Suncrest Court
36th Street Roeser Road to Broadway Road
36th Street McDowell Road to Camelback Road
36th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard
36th Street Cactus Road to Greenway Road
39th Avenue Van Buren Street to Osborn Road
39th Avenue Missouri Avenue to Camino Acequia
39th Avenue Peoria Avenue to Cactus Road
39th Avenue Bell Road to Yorkshire Drive
40th Street University Drive to 0.25 Miles North of University Drive
40th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard
44th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard
44th Street Ray Road to Warner-Elliot Loop
Page 376
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
44th Street Paradise Village Parkway North to Bell Road
44th Street Deer Valley Drive to Cashman Drive
45th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
46th Street Paradise Village Parkway North to Thunderbird Road
47th Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road
47th Avenue Thomas Road to Camelback Road
47th Avenue Thunderbird Road to Greenway Road
47th Avenue Acoma Drive to Bell Road
48th Street Pecos Park Entrance to Frye Road
48th Street Elwood Street to University Drive
48th Street Van Buren Street to McDowell Road
48th Street Cholla Street to Paradise Village Parkway South
50th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard
51st Street Elliot Road to Piedmont Road
52nd Place Rancho Paloma Drive to Dove Valley Road
52nd Street Thomas Road to Osborn Road
52nd Street Cholla Street to Cactus Road
52nd Street Thunderbird Road to Bell Road
52nd Street Jomax Road to Pinnacle Vista Drive
53rd Avenue Maryvale Parkway to Indian School Road
55th Avenue McDowell Road to Camelback Road
Page 377
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
55th Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Alameda Road
56TH STREET CAMELBACK ROAD TO ROCKRIDGE ROAD
56th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard
59th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road
60th Street Desert Cove Avenue to Cholla Street Alignment
60th Street Cactus Road to Bell Road
63rd Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Pima Street
63rd Avenue Thomas Road to Osborn Road
63rd Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road
70th Street Princess Drive to Mayo Boulevard
71st Avenue Van Buren Street to Roosevelt Street
71st Avenue McDowell Road to Indian School Road
71st Avenue Campbell Avenue to Camelback Road
71st Drive Indian School Road to Sells Drive
79th Drive Osborn Road to Sells Drive
80th Lane Thomas Road to Osborn Road
93rd Avenue Encanto Boulevard to Thomas Road
103rd Avenue Broadway Road to Country Place Boulevard
103rd Avenue Indian School Road to Campbell Avenue
111th Avenue Campbell Avenue to Camelback Road
Page 378
Table A1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on School
Days.
Cactus Road Westbound 350 Feet +/- East of 37th Avenue and Eastbound 350 Feet +/-
West of 37th Avenue
Ray Road 400 Feet North of Thunderhill Drive to 100 Feet South of Mountain Sky
Avenue
19th Avenue 450 Feet North of Orangewood Avenue to 450 Feet South of Orangewood
Avenue
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Adams Street 27th Avenue to Washington Street
Anthem Way 46th Drive to Black Canyon Freeway
Ball Park Boulevard Camelback Road to Grand Canal
Beardsley Road 20th Street to Cave Creek Road
Bethany Home Road 16th Street to 18th Street
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Madison Street to Van Buren Street
Road
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Interstate 17 Milepost No. 213.34 (North of Bell Road) to
Road (Southbound) Bell Road
Black Mountain Boulevard SR101 to Mayo Boulevard
Black Mountain Boulevard Rancho Paloma Drive to Carefree Highway
Buckeye Road 31st Avenue to 27th Street
Camelback Road 27th Avenue to 28th Street
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 3900 WEST TO 700 FEET EAST OF 33RD AVENUE
Central Avenue Briarwood Terrace to Chandler Boulevard
Page 379
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Central Avenue Mineral Road to Thunderbird Trail
Central Avenue (Southbound) Thunderbird Trail to Dobbins Road
Central Avenue Vineyard Road to Pioneer Street
Central Avenue Watkins Street to Lincoln Street
Central Avenue Roosevelt Street to Mountain View Road
Central Avenue Happy Valley Road to 2,050 Feet +/- North of Happy Valley
Road
Chandler Boulevard Shaughnessey Road to 19th Avenue
Chandler Boulevard (Westbound) 19th Avenue to 15th Avenue
Chandler Boulevard Pecos Road to Shaughnessey Road
Cheryl Drive 35th Avenue to Metro Parkway West
Circle Mountain Road New River Road to Barko Lane
Cotton Center Boulevard 40th Street to 48th Street
DEER VALLEY DRIVE 1,200 FEET WEST OF 35TH AVENUE TO 35TH AVENUE
Desert Foothills Parkway Chandler Boulevard to 5th Avenue
Desert Willow Parkway East 31000 North Cave Creek Road (East Side) to 5000 East
Dixileta Drive
Dobbins Road Central Avenue to 16th Street
Dove Valley Road North Valley Parkway to 16th Avenue
Dunlap Avenue 7th Avenue to 7th Street
Encanto Boulevard 83rd Avenue to 75th Avenue
Frye Road 3rd Street to Desert Foothills Parkway
Page 380
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Galvin Parkway North of Traffic Circle at Botanical Garden Entry to
McDowell Road
GRAND AVENUE 18TH AVENUE to 15TH AVENUE
Grant Street Black Canyon Freeway to Lincoln Street
Grant Street 16th Street to Sky Harbor Circle
Greenway Road Cave Creek Road to Greenway Parkway
Guadalupe Road 48th Street to Interstate 10
Happy Valley Road 29th Avenue to 23rd Avenue
Hatcher Road 19th Avenue to Central Avenue
Holmes Boulevard Bell Road to Grovers Avenue
Indian School Road 27th Avenue to 20th Street
Indian School Road 45th Street to 48th Street
Jefferson Street 23rd Avenue to 7th Avenue
Jefferson Street 7th Street to Washington Street
Jefferson Street 7th Street to 265 Feet +/- East of 26th Street (except
frontage road which is 25 mph)
Jomax Road Cave Creek Road to Tatum Boulevard
Jomax Road Tatum Boulevard to 52nd Street
Knox Road 36th Street to 48th Street
Lafayette Boulevard 44th Street to 64th Street
Liberty Lane 17th Avenue to Central Avenue
Liberty Lane Desert Foothills Parkway to 13th Way
Page 381
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Lincoln Street Grant Street to 7th Street
Lone Mountain Road 40th Street to Cave Creek Road
Lower Buckeye Road 300 Feet West to 300 Feet East of 99th Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 22nd Avenue to 19th Avenue
Maryland Avenue 19th Avenue to 16th Street
Maryvale Parkway Indian School Road to 51st Avenue
McDowell Road 27th Avenue to 32nd Street
Metro Parkway Entire Street Surrounding Metro Center
Missouri Avenue 19th Avenue to 24th Street
Mohave Street 7th Street to Sky Harbor Circle
Mohave Street 22nd Street to 24th Street
Mountain View Road Central Avenue to 12th Street
Norterra Parkway Happy Valley Road to Jomax Road
Oak Street 24th Street to 32nd Street
Oak Street 52nd Street to 56th Street
Osborn Road 19th Avenue to 36th Street
Paloma Parkway Bronco Butte Trail to Dove Valley Road
Paradise Village Parkway Entire Street Surrounding Paradise Village
Peoria Avenue 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Pinnacle Peak Road 19th Avenue to 7th Street
POCONO WAY 800 FEET NORTH OF HACKAMORE DRIVE TO 33RD AVENUE
Page 382
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Pointe Golf Club Drive Thunderbird Road to Sharon Drive
Princess Drive 68th Street to Scottsdale Road
Pyramid Peak Parkway 1,900 Feet +/- North of Brookhart Way to City Limits
(Northbound)
Ranch Circle North Ray Road (3600 East) to Ray Road (4300 East)
Ranch Circle South Ray Road to Mountain Parkway
Rancho Paloma Drive Black Mountain Boulevard to 56th Street
Roeser Road Central Avenue to 40th Street
Roosevelt Street 16th Street to 32nd Street
Rose Garden Lane 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Shea Boulevard 24th Street to 32nd Street
Sky Harbor Circle 22nd Street to Grant Street, Mohave Street to Grant Street,
and Mohave Street to 22nd Street
Southern Avenue 7th Avenue to 7th Street
Sweetwater Avenue Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street
Tatum Boulevard 40th Street to Cave Creek Road
Thistle Landing Drive 48th Street to 50th Street
Thomas Road 27th Avenue to 32nd Street
Thunderbird Road 32nd Street to 38th Place
Tombstone Trail Norterra Parkway to 21st Avenue
University Drive 16th Street to 24th Street
Utopia Road Black Canyon Freeway to 23rd Avenue
Page 383
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Utopia Road Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street
Van Buren Street 35th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Van Buren Street 16th Street to 44th Street
Washington Street Adams Street to 7th Avenue
Washington Street 7th Street to 24th Street (except frontage road which is 25
mph)
Williams Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue
Yorkshire Drive 43rd Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway
1st Avenue Crossover Grant Street to Hadley Street
3rd Avenue Osborn Road to Indian School Road
3rd Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard
3rd Street Fillmore Street to Indian School Road
4th Street 5th Street Crossover to Roosevelt Street
5th Avenue Desert Foothills Parkway to Chandler Boulevard
5th Street Crossover Fillmore Street to 4th Street
7th Avenue Dobbins Road to Baseline Road
7th Avenue Magnolia Street to Jackson Street
7th Avenue Van Buren Street to Missouri Avenue
7th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Hatcher Road
7TH AVENUE CINNABAR AVENUE TO PEORIA AVENUE
7th Avenue Greenway Parkway to Bell Road
7th Street Mineral Road to Baseline Road
Page 384
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
7th Street Lincoln Street to Jefferson Street
7th Street Van Buren Street to Missouri Avenue
7th Street Butler Drive to Cinnabar Avenue
12th Street Indian School Road to Mountain View Road
15th Avenue Southern Avenue to Broadway Road
15th AVENUE 0.25 MILES SOUTH OF MAGNOLIA STREET TO BETHANY
HOME ROAD
15TH AVENUE VAN BUREN STREET TO BETHANY HOME ROAD
16th Street Dobbins Road to Baseline Road
16th Street Maricopa Freeway to Bethany Home Road
16th Street Bell Road to Grovers Avenue
17th Avenue Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard
17th Avenue Buckeye Road to Grant Street
19th Avenue Buckeye Road to the Grand Canal
19th Avenue Glendale Avenue to Northern Avenue (Except where noted
in subsection A.1 of this section)
20th Street Highland Avenue to Missouri Avenue
21st Avenue Jomax Road to Tombstone Trail
23rd Avenue Bethany Home Road to Glendale Avenue
23rd Avenue Mountain View Road to Cactus Road
23rd Avenue Utopia Road to Deer Valley Drive
23rd Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road
Page 385
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
24th Street South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road
24th Street Buckeye Road to Indian School Road
25th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Peoria Avenue
27th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road
27th Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Van Buren Street
27th Avenue Northern Avenue to Dunlap Avenue
27th Avenue Grovers Avenue to Union Hills Drive
27th Avenue Yorkshire Drive to Rose Garden Lane
27th Drive North Valley Parkway to Carefree Highway
28th Drive Peoria Avenue to Cactus Road
29th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Metro Parkway
29th Avenue Greenway Road to Bell Road
32nd Street Air Lane to Van Buren Street
32nd Street Chandler Boulevard to Pecos Road
33RD AVENUE POCONO WAY TO PINNACLE VISTA DRIVE
35th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road
35th Avenue Van Buren Street to Encanto Boulevard
35th AVENUE HAPPY VALLEY ROAD TO 800 FEET NORTH OF HACKAMORE
DRIVE
36th Street Shea Boulevard to Cactus Road
39th Drive Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road
40th Street 0.39 miles South of Air Lane to Washington Street
Page 386
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
40th Street McDowell Road to Missouri Avenue
40th Street (Southbound) Shea Boulevard to Mercer Lane
40th Street Potter Drive to Deer Valley Drive
40th Street Tatum Boulevard to Lone Mountain Road
43rd Avenue Olney Avenue to Dobbins Road
43rd Avenue Elwood Street Alignment to Lower Buckeye Road
43rd Avenue Anthem Way to 1,930 Feet North of Anthem Way
44th Street Campbell Avenue to Calle Feliz
44th Place Cotton Center Boulevard to Broadway Road
48th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard
48th Street Washington Street to Van Buren Street
48th Street Piedmont Road to Guadalupe Road
50th Street Chandler Boulevard to Ray Road
51st Street 500 Feet South of Elliot Road to Warner-Elliot Loop
52nd Street McDowell Road to Thomas Road
52nd Street Cactus Road to Thunderbird Road
55th Avenue Alameda Road to Happy Valley Road
56th Street South City Limit to Van Buren Street
56th Street Oak Street to Camelback Road
56th Street Bell Road to Central Arizona Project Canal
56th Street Lone Mountain Road to Rancho Paloma Drive
Page 387
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
64th Street Oak Street to McDowell Road (Southbound Only)
64th Street 255 Feet North of Hillcrest Boulevard to Chaparral Road
68th Street Princess Drive to Mayo Boulevard
71st Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road
107th Avenue Camelback Road to Missouri Avenue
Table B1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on School Days.
Dunlap Avenue For Westbound, 650 Feet +/- West of 29th Avenue to 625 +/- West of
35th Avenue
Dunlap Avenue For Eastbound, 545 Feet +/- West of 35th Avenue to 30th Avenue
Table B2. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on School Days.
Greenway Parkway 400 Feet West of 7th Avenue to 250 Feet East of 5th Avenue
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Air Lane 24th Street to 32nd Street
BASELINE ROAD 51ST AVENUE TO 35TH AVENUE
BASELINE ROAD 43RD AVENUE TO 35TH AVENUE
Baseline Road 7th Avenue to 7th Street
Beardsley Road (Eastbound 37th Avenue to 27th Avenue
Frontage)
Beardsley Road Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street
Bell Road 19th Avenue to 12th Street
Page 388
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Bell Road 0.25 miles West of Cave Creek Road to 1,500 Feet East of
40th Street
Bethany Home Road 43rd Avenue to 16th Street
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Maricopa Freeway to Madison Street
Roads
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Thomas Road to Cactus Road
Road (Northbound)
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
Road (Northbound)
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Mountain View Road (Alignment) to Thomas Road
Road (Southbound)
Black Mountain Boulevard Mayo Boulevard to Pinnacle Peak Road
Broadway Road 19th Avenue to 32nd Street
Buckeye Road 39th Avenue to 31st Avenue
Cactus Road 39th Avenue to 350 Feet West of 37th Avenue
Cactus Road 350 Feet East of 37th Avenue to 19th Avenue
Cactus Road Cave Creek Road to 60th Street
Camelback Road 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue
Camelback Road 28th Street to 64th Street
Cave Creek Road Dunlap Avenue to Peoria Avenue
Cave Creek Road Marco Polo Road to Rose Garden Lane
Central Avenue (Northbound) Thunderbird Trail to Dobbins Road
Central Avenue Dobbins Road to Vineyard Road
Central Avenue Pioneer Street to Watkins Street
Page 389
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Chandler Boulevard Marketplace Way to 34th Street
Deer Valley Drive 600 Feet West of 27th Avenue to 0.25 Miles East of 19th
Avenue
Deer Valley Drive 600 Feet West of 16th Street to 56th Street
Desert Foothills Parkway Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard
Desert Peak Parkway Lieber Place to Cave Creek Road
Dobbins Road From West City Limit to 1,320 Feet +/- East
Dobbins Road 23rd Avenue to Central Avenue
Dunlap Avenue 43rd Avenue to 7th Avenue (Except where noted in Table
B1 of this section)
Durango Street 35th Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway
Elliot Road 2,085 Feet +/- West of 59th Avenue to 51st Avenue
Elliot Road 46th Street to 51st Street
Elwood Street 7th Street to 16th Street
Galvin Parkway Van Buren Street to 100 Feet +/- North of East Papago Park
(Zoo Entrance)
Gavilan Peak Parkway 800 Feet +/- West of 33rd Lane to Cloud Road
Glendale Avenue 43rd Avenue to 21st Street
GRAND AVENUE 21ST AVENUE TO 19TH AVENUE
Greenway Parkway 500 Feet West of 7th Avenue to 3rd Avenue (Except where
noted in Table B2 of this section)
Greenway Parkway Cave Creek Road to Greenway Road
Greenway Road 51st Avenue to 19th Avenue
Page 390
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Greenway Road Greenway Parkway to 300 Feet East of 30th Street
Greenway Road 52nd Street to 500 Feet East of 60th Street
Indian School Road 67th Avenue to 27th Avenue
Indian School Road 20th Street to 45th Street
Indian School Road 48th Street to 60th Street
Jomax Road Black Canyon Freeway to Norterra Parkway
Liberty Lane 13th Way to 24th Street
Lincoln Drive 21st Street to 800 Feet East of Ocotillo Road
Lower Buckeye Road 103rd Avenue to 300 Feet +/- West of 99th Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 300 Feet +/- East of 99th Avenue to 95th Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 27th Avenue to 22nd Avenue
Maricopa Freeway Frontage Roads 23rd Avenue to 16th Street
Mayo Boulevard Black Mountain Boulevard to 40th Street
McDowell Road 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue
McDowell Road 32nd Street to 52nd Street
Mountain Parkway Chandler Boulevard to Ray Road
Norterra Parkway Jomax Road to North Valley Parkway
Northern Avenue 43rd Avenue to SR-51
North Valley Parkway Jomax Road to 30th Avenue
North Valley Parkway 800 Feet +/- West of 33rd Lane to 33rd Lane
Peoria Avenue 43rd Avenue to 19th Avenue
Page 391
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Pyramid Peak Parkway 67th Avenue to City Limits
(Southbound)
Pyramid Peak Parkway 67th Avenue to 1,900 Feet +/- North of Brookhart Way
(Northbound)
Ray Road Chandler Boulevard to Interstate 10 (Except where noted in
Table A1 of this section)
Rose Garden Lane Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street
Shea Boulevard 32nd Street to 450 Feet East of 40th Street
Southern Avenue 39th Avenue to 31st Avenue
Southern Avenue 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue
Southern Avenue 7th Street to 24th Street
Thomas Road 800 Feet West of 59th Avenue to Grand Avenue
Thomas Road 32nd Street to 56th Street
Thunderbird Road 31st Avenue to Coral Gables Drive
Thunderbird Road 38th Place to Scottsdale Road
Union Hills Drive 27th Avenue to 19th Avenue
Union Hills Drive 7th Street to 20th Street
University Drive Wood Street to 48th Street
Van Buren Street 67th Avenue to 200 Feet West of 63rd Avenue
Van Buren Street 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue
Van Buren Street 44th Street to 56th Street
Warner-Elliot Loop 4600 East Elliot Road to 578 Feet East of Wakial Loop
Washington Street 24th Street to 34th Street
Page 392
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
7th Avenue Baseline Road to Magnolia Street
7th Avenue Missouri Avenue to Dunlap Avenue
7th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
7th Avenue Rose Garden Lane to Deer Valley Drive
7th Street Baseline Road to Lincoln Street
7th Street Missouri Avenue to Butler Drive
7th Street Cinnabar Avenue to 400 Feet North of Peoria Avenue
7th Street Thunderbird Road to 600 Feet North of Bell Road
16th Street Baseline Road to the Maricopa Freeway
16th Street Bethany Home Road to Northern Avenue
19th Avenue Southern Avenue to Buckeye Road
19th Avenue Grand Canal to Glendale Avenue
19th Avenue Northern Avenue to Evans Drive
24th Street Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard
24th Street Baseline Road to Buckeye Road
24th Street Indian School Road to Montebello Avenue
27th Avenue Baseline Road to 500 Feet +/- North
27th Avenue Van Buren Street to Northern Avenue
32nd Street Baseline Road to Wood Street
32nd Street Van Buren Street to the Arizona Canal
32nd Street Mountain View Road to Bell Road
Page 393
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
32nd Street Beardsley Road to Rose Garden Lane
35th Avenue Dobbins Road to South Mountain Avenue
35th Avenue Baseline Road to Broadway Road
35th Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Van Buren Street
35th Avenue Encanto Boulevard to Bell Road
35th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Beardsley Road
40th Street Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard
40th Street 800 Feet South of Roeser Road to University Drive
40th Street Washington Street to McDowell Road
40th Street (Northbound) Shea Boulevard to Mercer Lane
40th Street Mercer Lane to Union Hills Drive
40th Street Deer Valley Drive to Pinnacle Peak Road
43rd Avenue Buckeye Road to Glendale Avenue
43rd Avenue Thunderbird Road to Beardsley Road
43rd Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road
44th Street Washington Street to Campbell Avenue
44th Street Calle Feliz to McDonald Drive
48th Street Chandler Boulevard to Piedmont Road
51st Avenue 0.5 Miles South of Lower Buckeye Road to Lower Buckeye
Road
51st Avenue Roosevelt Street to Camelback Road
51st Avenue 250 Feet South of Cactus Road to Union Hills Drive
Page 394
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
51st Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road
52nd Street Van Buren Street to McDowell Road
56th Street Shea Boulevard to Bell Road
56th Street Central Arizona Project Canal to Pinnacle Peak Road
59th Avenue Dobbins Road to South Mountain Avenue
59th Avenue Roosevelt Street to Camelback Road
64th Street Cactus Road to Bell Road
67th Avenue 400 Feet +/- South of Elwood Street to Camelback Road
67th Avenue Happy Valley Road to Pyramid Peak Parkway
75th Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road
75th Avenue 0.25 Miles South of Thomas Road to Devonshire Avenue
83rd Avenue Van Buren Street to Papago Freeway
91st Avenue McDowell Road to Indian School Road
99th Avenue 0.5 Miles South of Lower Buckeye Road to Durango Street
107th Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
BASELINE ROAD 55TH AVENUE TO 51ST AVENUE
BASELINE ROAD 55TH AVENUE TO 43RD AVENUE
BASELINE ROAD 35th AVENUE TO 7TH AVENUE
Baseline Road 7th Street to 48th Street
Page 395
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Beardsley Road (Frontage Roads) 27th Avenue to 20th Street
Beardsley Road Frontage Road 27th Avenue to 51st Avenue
(Westbound)
Beardsley Road Frontage Road 51st Avenue to 37th Avenue
(Eastbound)
Bell Road 51st Avenue to 19th Avenue
Bell Road 12th Street to 0.25 Miles West of Cave Creek Road
Bell Road 1,500 Feet East of 40th Street to Scottsdale Road
Black Canyon Frontage Road Van Buren Street to Thomas Road
Black Canyon Frontage Road Cactus Road to Greenway Road
(Northbound)
Black Canyon Frontage Road Union Hills Drive to MP 213.34 (North of Bell Road)
(Southbound)
Black Canyon Frontage Road Bell Road to Mountain View Road Frontage Road (Alignment)
(Southbound)
Broadway Road 107th Avenue to 99th Avenue
Broadway Road 27th Avenue to 19th Avenue
Broadway Road 32nd Street to 48th Street
Buckeye Road 71st Avenue to 39th Avenue
Cactus Road 51st Avenue to 39th Avenue
Camelback Road 113th Avenue to 99th Avenue
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 4700 WEST TO 3900 WEST
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 700 FEET EAST OF 33RD AVENUE TO 0.5 MILES EAST OF VIA
TRAMONTO
Page 396
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
CAREFREE HIGHWAY VIA PUZZOLA DRIVE TO 0.5 MILES EAST OF PALOMA
PARKWAY
Cave Creek Road Peoria Avenue to Marco Polo Road
Cave Creek Road Rose Garden Lane to Pinnacle Peak Road
Cave Creek Road (Southbound) Pinnacle Peak to 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane
Cave Creek Road Peak View Road to Westland Road
Chandler Boulevard (Eastbound) 19th Avenue to 15th Avenue
Chandler Boulevard 15th Avenue to Marketplace Way
Chandler Boulevard 34th Street to Interstate 10
Deer Valley Drive 35th Avenue to 600 Feet West of 27th Avenue
Deer Valley Drive 0.25 Miles East of 19th Avenue to 600 Feet West of 16th
Street
Dixileta Drive Tatum Boulevard to 52nd Street
Dobbins Road 1,320 Feet +/- East of City Limit to 200 Feet +/- West of 56th
Glen
Dobbins Road 0.25 Miles West of 35th Avenue to 33rd Avenue
Dobbins Road 27th Avenue to 23rd Avenue
Dove Valley Road 16th Avenue to Sonoran Desert Drive
Dynamite Boulevard Cave Creek Road to 40th Street
GRAND AVENUE 43RD AVENUE TO 21ST AVENUE
Greenway Parkway 17th Drive to 500 Feet West of 7th Avenue
Greenway Parkway 3rd Avenue to Cave Creek Road
Greenway Road 19th Avenue to 17th Drive
Page 397
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Greenway Road 300 Feet East of 30th Street to 52nd Street
Greenway Road 500 Feet East of 60th Street to Scottsdale Road
Happy Valley Road 67th Avenue to 29th Avenue
Happy Valley Road 23rd Avenue to 7th Street
Indian School Road 99th Avenue to 67th Avenue
Jomax Road Norterra Parkway to 19th Avenue
Lincoln Drive 800 Feet East of Ocotillo Road to 32nd Street
Lone Mountain Road 56th Street to 63rd Street
Lower Buckeye Road 95th Avenue to 83rd Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 79th Avenue to 75th Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 67th Avenue to 27th Avenue
Mayo Boulevard Tatum Boulevard to Scottsdale Road
McDowell Road 83rd Avenue to 43rd Avenue
McDowell Road 52nd Street to 1,350 Feet East of 52nd Street
McDowell Road 1,575 Feet West of Galvin Parkway to 64th Street
New River Road 1.0 Mile Southwest of Black Canyon Freeway to Black Canyon
Freeway
Pinnacle Peak Road 55th Avenue to 19th Avenue
Pinnacle Peak Road Cave Creek Road to Tatum Boulevard
Shea Boulevard 450 Feet East of 40th Street to 64th Street
Sonoran Desert Drive Dove Valley Road to Cave Creek Road
Southern Avenue 59th Avenue to 51st Avenue
Page 398
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Southern Avenue 31st Avenue to 19th Avenue
Southern Avenue 24th Street to 48th Street
Tatum Boulevard Mockingbird Lane to Pinnacle Peak Road
Tatum Boulevard Prickly Pear Trail to Cave Creek Road
Thomas Road 99th Avenue to 800 Feet West of 59th Avenue
Thunderbird Road 51st Avenue to 31st Avenue
Thunderbird Road Coral Gables Drive to 1,400 Feet East of 7th Street
Thunderbird Road 18th Street to Cave Creek Road
Union Hills Drive 51st Avenue to 27th Avenue
Union Hills Drive 19th Avenue to 7th Street
Union Hills Drive 20th Street to Tatum Boulevard
Van Buren Street 83rd Avenue to 67th Avenue
Van Buren Street 200 Feet West of 63rd Avenue to 39th Avenue
Van Buren Street 56th Street to 508 Feet East of Project Drive
Washington Street 34th Street to 56th Street
7th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Rose Garden Lane
7th Street 400 Feet North of Peoria Avenue to Thunderbird Road
7th Street 600 Feet North of Bell Road to Happy Valley Road
19th Avenue Dobbins Road to Southern Avenue
19th Avenue Evans Drive to Jomax Road
24th Street Baseline Road to Roeser Road
Page 399
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
24th Street Montebello Avenue to Lincoln Drive
27th Avenue Southern Avenue to Broadway Road
29th Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road
32nd Street Arizona Canal to Lincoln Drive
32nd Street Bell Road to Beardsley Road
35th Avenue 200 Feet South of Elliot Road to Dobbins Road
35th Avenue Baseline Road to 500 Feet +/- North
35th Avenue Broadway Road to Lower Buckeye Road
35th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
35th Avenue Beardsley Road to Pinnacle Peak Road
40th Street Baseline Road to 800 Feet South of Roeser Road
43rd Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Southern Avenue
43rd Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Buckeye Road
43rd Avenue Glendale Avenue to Thunderbird Road
48th Street Baseline Road to Southern Avenue
51st Avenue Dobbins Road to Baseline Road
51st Avenue Baseline Road to Roosevelt Street
51st Avenue Union Hills Drive to Beardsley Road
59th Avenue Elliot Road to Dobbins Road
59th Avenue Buckeye Road to Roosevelt Street
75th Avenue Broadway Road to Van Buren Street
Page 400
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
75th Avenue Roosevelt Street 0.25 miles South of Thomas Road
75th Avenue Devonshire Avenue to Camelback Road
83RD AVENUE BROADWAY ROAD TO ELWOOD STREET
83RD AVENUE BROADWAY ROAD TO BUCKEYE ROAD
83rd Avenue Papago Freeway to Camelback Road
91st Avenue Elwood Street to Buckeye Road
91st Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road
99th Avenue Durango Street to Buckeye Road
Table E. Prima Facie Speed Limit 50 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Greenway Road to Bell Road
Road (Northbound)
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Union Hills Drive to Pinnacle Peak Road
Road
Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Happy Valley Road to Interstate 17 Mile Post No. 220.82 (South
Roads of Dixileta Drive Alignment)
Broadway Road 99th Avenue to 91st Avenue
Buckeye Road 75th Avenue to 71st Avenue
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 0.5 MILES EAST OF PALOMA PARKWAY TO 7TH AVENUE
Cave Creek Road (Northbound) Pinnacle Peak Road to 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane
Cave Creek Road 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane to Peak View Road
Page 401
Table E. Prima Facie Speed Limit 50 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Dobbins Road 43rd Avenue to 0.25 Miles West of 35th Avenue
El Mirage Road 0.25 Miles South of Camelback Road to 0.50 Miles North of Camelback
Road
Lower Buckeye Road 107th Avenue to 103rd Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 83rd Avenue to 79th Avenue
Lower Buckeye Road 75th Avenue to 71st Avenue
McDowell Road 1,350 Feet East of 52nd Street to 1,575 Feet West of Galvin Parkway
New River Road Cloud Road to 1.0 Mile Southwest of Black Canyon Freeway
Pinnacle Peak Road Tatum Boulevard to Scottsdale Road
Tatum Boulevard Pinnacle Peak Road to Prickly Pear Trail
Thunderbird Road 1,400 Feet East of 7th Street to 18th Street
51st Avenue Estrella Drive to Olney Avenue
59th Avenue Broadway Road to Durango Street Alignment
75th Avenue Van Buren Street to Roosevelt Street
83RD AVENUE ELWOOD STREET TO BUCKEYE ROAD
91st Avenue 1.56 Miles South of Broadway Road to 0.5 Miles South of Broadway
Road
99th Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road
99th Avenue 0.25 Miles North of Broadway Road to 0.5 Miles South of Lower
Buckeye Road
Table F. Prima Facie Speed Limit 55 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 6600 WEST TO 4700 WEST
Page 402
Table F. Prima Facie Speed Limit 55 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
CAREFREE HIGHWAY 1,200 FEET EAST OF 33RD AVENUE TO 0.5 MILES EAST OF VIA
TRAMANTO
G. Parks.
1. North Mountain Park.
a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
North Mountain Park Entire Length
Drive
2. Papago Park.
a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
All roadways except Galvin Parkway.
3. Pecos Park.
a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
All roadways within park boundary.
4. South Mountain Park.
a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
All roadways within park boundary.
5. Piestewa Peak Park.
a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Piestewa Peak Drive Piestewa Peak Park Boundary to End of Road Within Piestewa
Peak Park
H. Sky Harbor Airport.
1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 15 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Sky Harbor Boulevard (North and Between Terminal Curb and Sky Harbor Boulevard
Page 403
South Roadway) Median on All Terminals 2 and 3 and on Level 1 of
Terminal 4
Sky Harbor Boulevard (North and All Ticketing/Check-in Lanes on Level 2 of Terminal 4
South Roadway)
2. Prima Facie Speed Limit 20 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Sky Harbor Boulevard 4,400 Feet East of 24th Street to 6,300 Feet East of 24th Street
(South Roadway)
3. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Sky Harbor Boulevard All Ramps, Entries and Exits for All Ticketing/Check-in and Baggage
(North and South Claim Lanes at Terminals 3 and 4
Roadway)
4. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Sky Harbor Boulevard 3,000 Feet East of 24th Street to 4,400 Feet East of 24th Street
(South Roadway)
5. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.
Sky Harbor Boulevard Between 24th Street and SR 143, Except as Provided in the Prior
(North and South Subsections
Roadway)
Page 404
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend City Code - Article XI, Section 36-134, Stopping, Standing or Parking
Prohibited in Specific Places (Ordinance G-7005)
Request to amend Phoenix City Code, Chapter 36, section 134, stopping, standing or
parking prohibited in specific places, due to Arizona House Bill 2395 amending Arizona
Revised Statute, section 28-873 relating to vehicles stopping, standing, or parking.
Summary
Last year, the Arizona Legislature provided an amendment to Arizona Revised Statute,
section 28-873, prohibiting a vehicle parked on a private driveway from blocking a
sidewalk with any portion of the vehicle. The amendment was made to follow the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Phoenix City Code 36-134 requires an amendment to
reflect the new State law.
The Street Transportation Department is recommending Phoenix City Code 36-134 be
amended and the existing verbiage be updated to include the following: "in a private
driveway if any part of the vehicle or an attachment to the vehicle, including a hitch or
trailer, blocks an area of a sidewalk and impedes continuous pedestrian use of the
sidewalk in a manner that is not consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act as
defined in section 41-1492, Arizona Revised Statutes. This paragraph does not apply if
the vehicle is temporarily parked for the purposes of loading or unloading the vehicle."
The proposed changes to Chapter 36, section 134, were reviewed and recommended
by the Law Department.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 405
Report
Prohibited in Specific Places (Ordinance G-7005)
Request to amend Phoenix City Code, Chapter 36, section 134, stopping, standing or
parking prohibited in specific places, due to Arizona House Bill 2395 amending Arizona
Revised Statute, section 28-873 relating to vehicles stopping, standing, or parking.
Summary
Last year, the Arizona Legislature provided an amendment to Arizona Revised Statute,
section 28-873, prohibiting a vehicle parked on a private driveway from blocking a
sidewalk with any portion of the vehicle. The amendment was made to follow the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Phoenix City Code 36-134 requires an amendment to
reflect the new State law.
The Street Transportation Department is recommending Phoenix City Code 36-134 be
amended and the existing verbiage be updated to include the following: "in a private
driveway if any part of the vehicle or an attachment to the vehicle, including a hitch or
trailer, blocks an area of a sidewalk and impedes continuous pedestrian use of the
sidewalk in a manner that is not consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act as
defined in section 41-1492, Arizona Revised Statutes. This paragraph does not apply if
the vehicle is temporarily parked for the purposes of loading or unloading the vehicle."
The proposed changes to Chapter 36, section 134, were reviewed and recommended
by the Law Department.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 405
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Area Bounded by Fillmore to Roosevelt Streets, 7th to 24th Streets Active
Transportation Plan - Engineering Services - ST87600137 (Ordinance S-48834)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Toole Design Group, LLC, to provide Engineering Services that include design
services for the area bounded by Fillmore to Roosevelt streets, 7th to 24th streets
Active Transportation Plan project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The fee for services will not exceed $350,000.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation.
Further request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code
42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction
involving an interest in real property.
Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide a low-stress bicycle boulevard that meets
national standards. The bikeway improvements will be on Fillmore Street: 7th to 16th
streets, Villa Street: 16th to 20th streets, 20th Street: Villa to Roosevelt streets, and
Roosevelt Street: 20th to 24th streets. The design will consist of approximately 2.2
miles of bikeway improvements, including design for three intersections at arterials,
two intersections at collectors, and traffic calming or traffic diversion devices.
Toole Design Group, LLC is a design firm focused on active transportation and has
extensive experience designing bicycle boulevards and other low stress infrastructure.
Toole Design Group, LLC is familiar with the Garfield-Edison Park Bikeway
Page 406
Improvements project as they are currently serving as a subconsultant on the pre-
design of the project.
Toole Design Group, LLC's services include, but are not limited to, designing a bicycle
boulevard with intersections at arterials, intersections at collectors, and traffic calming
or traffic diversion devices, and other tasks as required for a complete project.
Procurement Information
Toole Design Group, LLC was chosen for this project using a Direct Select process set
forth in section 34-103 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. The Direct Select process will
reduce the time to procure additional design services, as opposed to an advertised
selection process; therefore, meeting the project deadline and ensuring continuity and
the most efficient use of staff and funding resources.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement is two years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for Toole Design Group, LLC will not exceed $350,000, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.
Location
Area Bounded by Fillmore to Roosevelt streets and 7th to 24th streets
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 407
Report
Transportation Plan - Engineering Services - ST87600137 (Ordinance S-48834)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Toole Design Group, LLC, to provide Engineering Services that include design
services for the area bounded by Fillmore to Roosevelt streets, 7th to 24th streets
Active Transportation Plan project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The fee for services will not exceed $350,000.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation.
Further request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code
42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction
involving an interest in real property.
Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide a low-stress bicycle boulevard that meets
national standards. The bikeway improvements will be on Fillmore Street: 7th to 16th
streets, Villa Street: 16th to 20th streets, 20th Street: Villa to Roosevelt streets, and
Roosevelt Street: 20th to 24th streets. The design will consist of approximately 2.2
miles of bikeway improvements, including design for three intersections at arterials,
two intersections at collectors, and traffic calming or traffic diversion devices.
Toole Design Group, LLC is a design firm focused on active transportation and has
extensive experience designing bicycle boulevards and other low stress infrastructure.
Toole Design Group, LLC is familiar with the Garfield-Edison Park Bikeway
Page 406
Improvements project as they are currently serving as a subconsultant on the pre-
design of the project.
Toole Design Group, LLC's services include, but are not limited to, designing a bicycle
boulevard with intersections at arterials, intersections at collectors, and traffic calming
or traffic diversion devices, and other tasks as required for a complete project.
Procurement Information
Toole Design Group, LLC was chosen for this project using a Direct Select process set
forth in section 34-103 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. The Direct Select process will
reduce the time to procure additional design services, as opposed to an advertised
selection process; therefore, meeting the project deadline and ensuring continuity and
the most efficient use of staff and funding resources.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement is two years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for Toole Design Group, LLC will not exceed $350,000, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.
Location
Area Bounded by Fillmore to Roosevelt streets and 7th to 24th streets
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 407
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Streetlight Maintenance Services - Amendment - RFP 63-0037 (Ordinance S-
48847)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 149070 with Power Tech Contracting, LLC, to allow additional expenditures
for streetlight maintenance services for the Street Transportation Department. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures included in this amendment will not exceed $5 million.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional funding to the agreement that
is required as a result of a substantial increase in the amount of service requests and
critical maintenance projects, such as the rusted pole audit and initiatives to increase
lighting in unsafe areas, and more outage reports being placed utilizing the myPHX311
app.
This agreement provides streetlight maintenance services for all new and existing
poles and fixtures in the APS and SRP service areas throughout the City of Phoenix.
Power Tech Contracting, LLC provides all equipment, labor, materials, traffic control,
and services necessary to remove, relocate, upgrade existing, and install new
streetlights and equipment and to perform routine and non-routine maintenance of
existing streetlights within a specified time frame. The agreement has a year and a half
left, and the additional funding is needed for required work.
Contract Term
The agreement term will remain unchanged, ending on Dec. 31, 2023.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for this agreement was for an expenditure not to exceed
$6,922,425. An amendment increased the authorization for the agreement by $1.35
million. This amendment will increase the authorization for the agreement by an
additional $5 million for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $13,272,425.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department’s budget.
Page 408
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously approved:
· The Streetlight Maintenance, Design, and Construction Services Agreement 149070
(Ordinance S-45231) on Dec. 12, 2018; and
· An amendment to Agreement 149070 (Ordinance S-46998) on Oct. 21, 2020.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 409
Report
48847)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 149070 with Power Tech Contracting, LLC, to allow additional expenditures
for streetlight maintenance services for the Street Transportation Department. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures included in this amendment will not exceed $5 million.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional funding to the agreement that
is required as a result of a substantial increase in the amount of service requests and
critical maintenance projects, such as the rusted pole audit and initiatives to increase
lighting in unsafe areas, and more outage reports being placed utilizing the myPHX311
app.
This agreement provides streetlight maintenance services for all new and existing
poles and fixtures in the APS and SRP service areas throughout the City of Phoenix.
Power Tech Contracting, LLC provides all equipment, labor, materials, traffic control,
and services necessary to remove, relocate, upgrade existing, and install new
streetlights and equipment and to perform routine and non-routine maintenance of
existing streetlights within a specified time frame. The agreement has a year and a half
left, and the additional funding is needed for required work.
Contract Term
The agreement term will remain unchanged, ending on Dec. 31, 2023.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for this agreement was for an expenditure not to exceed
$6,922,425. An amendment increased the authorization for the agreement by $1.35
million. This amendment will increase the authorization for the agreement by an
additional $5 million for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $13,272,425.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department’s budget.
Page 408
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously approved:
· The Streetlight Maintenance, Design, and Construction Services Agreement 149070
(Ordinance S-45231) on Dec. 12, 2018; and
· An amendment to Agreement 149070 (Ordinance S-46998) on Oct. 21, 2020.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 409
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Citywide General Construction - Job Order Contracting Services - 4108JOC209
(Ordinance S-48850)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate master
agreements with the six contractors listed below to provide Citywide General
Construction Job Order Contracting Services in support of capital improvement
projects for various City departments. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreements as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The total fee for services will not exceed $90 million.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
deemed necessary to execute all utilities-related design and construction agreements,
licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the development, design,
and construction of the project and to include disbursement of funds. Utility services
include but are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications;
cable television; railroads; and other modes of transportation. Further request an
exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.
Summary
The Contractor's services will be used on an as-needed basis to provide Citywide Job
Order Contracting (JOC) Services that include general building/site construction in
remodeling, new building construction, re-roofing, HVAC installation, site
enhancements, painting, improvements, and some project related design work.
Additionally, the JOC contractors will be responsible for fulfilling Small Business
Enterprise program requirements.
Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Twenty firms submitted proposals
Page 410
and are listed in Attachment A.
Selected Firms
Rank 1: Brycon Corporation
Rank 2: Caliente Construction, Inc.
Rank 3: ForeSite Design & Construction, Inc.
Rank 4: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.
Rank 5: Okland Construction Company, Inc.
Rank 6: CHASSE Building Team, Inc.
Contract Term
The term of each master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $15 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The master agreement value for each of the JOC contractors will not exceed $15
million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services
will not exceed $90 million. The value for each job order agreement performed under
this master agreement will be up to $2 million each. In no event will any job order
agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to increase the limit.
Funding is available in the Citywide departments' Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 411
ATTACHMENT A
Selected Firms
Rank 1: Brycon Corporation
Rank 2: Caliente Construction, Inc.
Rank 3: ForeSite Design & Construction, Inc.
Rank 4: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.
Rank 5: Okland Construction Company, Inc.
Rank 6: CHASSE Building Team, Inc.
Additional Proposers
Rank 7: DNG Construction, Inc.
Rank 8: CORE Construction, Inc.
Rank 9: Builder’s Guild, Inc.
Rank 10: SDB, Inc.
Rank 11: FCI Constructors, Inc.
Rank 12: Haydon Building Corp.
Rank 13: Sun Eagle Corporation
Rank 14: D.L. Norton General Contracting, Inc.
Rank 15: Wilmeng Construction, Inc.
Rank 16: GCON, Inc.
Rank 17: W.E. O’Neil Construction Company of Arizona
Rank 18: KWR Construction, Inc.
Rank 19: Mark Scott Construction, Inc.
Rank 20: Gable Family Builders
Page 412
Report
(Ordinance S-48850)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate master
agreements with the six contractors listed below to provide Citywide General
Construction Job Order Contracting Services in support of capital improvement
projects for various City departments. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreements as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The total fee for services will not exceed $90 million.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
deemed necessary to execute all utilities-related design and construction agreements,
licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the development, design,
and construction of the project and to include disbursement of funds. Utility services
include but are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications;
cable television; railroads; and other modes of transportation. Further request an
exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.
Summary
The Contractor's services will be used on an as-needed basis to provide Citywide Job
Order Contracting (JOC) Services that include general building/site construction in
remodeling, new building construction, re-roofing, HVAC installation, site
enhancements, painting, improvements, and some project related design work.
Additionally, the JOC contractors will be responsible for fulfilling Small Business
Enterprise program requirements.
Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Twenty firms submitted proposals
Page 410
and are listed in Attachment A.
Selected Firms
Rank 1: Brycon Corporation
Rank 2: Caliente Construction, Inc.
Rank 3: ForeSite Design & Construction, Inc.
Rank 4: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.
Rank 5: Okland Construction Company, Inc.
Rank 6: CHASSE Building Team, Inc.
Contract Term
The term of each master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $15 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The master agreement value for each of the JOC contractors will not exceed $15
million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services
will not exceed $90 million. The value for each job order agreement performed under
this master agreement will be up to $2 million each. In no event will any job order
agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to increase the limit.
Funding is available in the Citywide departments' Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 411
ATTACHMENT A
Selected Firms
Rank 1: Brycon Corporation
Rank 2: Caliente Construction, Inc.
Rank 3: ForeSite Design & Construction, Inc.
Rank 4: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.
Rank 5: Okland Construction Company, Inc.
Rank 6: CHASSE Building Team, Inc.
Additional Proposers
Rank 7: DNG Construction, Inc.
Rank 8: CORE Construction, Inc.
Rank 9: Builder’s Guild, Inc.
Rank 10: SDB, Inc.
Rank 11: FCI Constructors, Inc.
Rank 12: Haydon Building Corp.
Rank 13: Sun Eagle Corporation
Rank 14: D.L. Norton General Contracting, Inc.
Rank 15: Wilmeng Construction, Inc.
Rank 16: GCON, Inc.
Rank 17: W.E. O’Neil Construction Company of Arizona
Rank 18: KWR Construction, Inc.
Rank 19: Mark Scott Construction, Inc.
Rank 20: Gable Family Builders
Page 412
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Citywide General Construction - Job Order Contracting Services - Amendment -
4108JOC178 (Ordinance S-48858)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 149736 with Brycon Corporation to provide additional General Construction
Services Citywide. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the City Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The additional fee for services included in this amendment will not exceed $4 million.
Summary
This amendment is necessary because Brycon Corporation was selected to retrofit an
existing building into a permanent 24/7 homeless respite shelter for up to 200
individuals. Brycon Corporation has completed Phase I of the construction services to
obtain a temporary building permit. The current contract does not have enough
spending capacity to allow for additional construction services necessary to complete
Phase II of the project needed for permanent occupancy. This amendment will provide
additional funds to the agreement.
Contract Term
The term of the original master agreement remains unchanged. Work scope identified
and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by
the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the agreement. No additional
changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
· The initial master agreement for Job Order Contracting Services was approved for
an amount not to exceed $10 million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable
costs.
· This amendment will increase the master agreement by an additional $4 million, for
a new total amount not-to-exceed $14 million, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.
Funding for this amendment is available in the Human Services Department's
Page 413
allocation of American Rescue Plan Act funding. The Budget and Research
Department will separately review and approve funding availability prior to the
execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all
rendered agreement services, which may extend past the agreement termination.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved General Construction Job Order Contracting Services
Agreement 149736 (Ordinance S-45604) on May 1, 2019.
Location
2739 E. Washington St.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Gina Montes, the
City Manager's Office, and the City Engineer.
Page 414
Report
4108JOC178 (Ordinance S-48858)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 149736 with Brycon Corporation to provide additional General Construction
Services Citywide. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the City Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The additional fee for services included in this amendment will not exceed $4 million.
Summary
This amendment is necessary because Brycon Corporation was selected to retrofit an
existing building into a permanent 24/7 homeless respite shelter for up to 200
individuals. Brycon Corporation has completed Phase I of the construction services to
obtain a temporary building permit. The current contract does not have enough
spending capacity to allow for additional construction services necessary to complete
Phase II of the project needed for permanent occupancy. This amendment will provide
additional funds to the agreement.
Contract Term
The term of the original master agreement remains unchanged. Work scope identified
and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by
the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the agreement. No additional
changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
· The initial master agreement for Job Order Contracting Services was approved for
an amount not to exceed $10 million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable
costs.
· This amendment will increase the master agreement by an additional $4 million, for
a new total amount not-to-exceed $14 million, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.
Funding for this amendment is available in the Human Services Department's
Page 413
allocation of American Rescue Plan Act funding. The Budget and Research
Department will separately review and approve funding availability prior to the
execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all
rendered agreement services, which may extend past the agreement termination.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved General Construction Job Order Contracting Services
Agreement 149736 (Ordinance S-45604) on May 1, 2019.
Location
2739 E. Washington St.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Gina Montes, the
City Manager's Office, and the City Engineer.
Page 414
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona Department of Transportation for
Traffic Signals and Under-Deck Lighting at Interstate 17 and Central Avenue
(Ordinance S-48854)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation, to define
the maintenance and operation responsibilities of the traffic signals and under-deck
lighting at Interstate 17 and Central Avenue after final completion of the South Central
Light Rail project.
Summary
Specifically, the agreement will define the maintenance of and electrical power for the
traffic signals and under-deck lighting at Interstate 17 (I-17) and Central Avenue. Light
Rail construction will be completed by the end of calendar year 2024.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022, and remain in effect for successive
periods of five years from the effective date.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.
Location
I-17 and Central Avenue.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 415
Report
Traffic Signals and Under-Deck Lighting at Interstate 17 and Central Avenue
(Ordinance S-48854)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation, to define
the maintenance and operation responsibilities of the traffic signals and under-deck
lighting at Interstate 17 and Central Avenue after final completion of the South Central
Light Rail project.
Summary
Specifically, the agreement will define the maintenance of and electrical power for the
traffic signals and under-deck lighting at Interstate 17 (I-17) and Central Avenue. Light
Rail construction will be completed by the end of calendar year 2024.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022, and remain in effect for successive
periods of five years from the effective date.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.
Location
I-17 and Central Avenue.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 415
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Glendale for the Installation of
Vehicle Detection Along Glendale Avenue (Ordinance S-48845)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Glendale for the installation of upgraded
vehicle detection at four signalized intersections along Glendale Avenue from 43rd to
27th avenues. Further request to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42
-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. Additionally, request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of this agreement
will not exceed $13,365.
Summary
In association with the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) System
Management and Operations Plan, Phoenix intends to permit the City of Glendale to
utilize Phoenix right-of-way to install vehicle detection system upgrades at four City of
Phoenix signalized intersections along the Glendale Avenue roadway corridor. The
project will be funded from local and federal funds through the utilization of the MAG
Transportation Improvement Program Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Improvement funds. The estimated construction cost is $904,860, which is made up of
$853,282 of federal funds, and local matches from the City of Glendale of $51,578 and
the City of Phoenix of $13,365.
The detection upgrades are to be installed at 19 signalized intersections along
Glendale Avenue, with 4 signals (27th, 35th, 39th and 43rd avenues) located within the
Agua Fria Freeway (L101) to Interstate 17 (I-17). The project includes the removal of
existing video detection, removal of existing loop detection at all signals, and
installation of new signal detection mounted on the signals within the project limits. The
new advanced detection is to be installed preferably on all four approaches, but if
restraints are presented, the detection must at least be installed on the two Glendale
Avenue approaches. The use of Phoenix right-of-way is limited to the installation of the
detection only and does not include access for the purpose of maintenance or
operations.
Page 416
The existing traffic signals along Glendale Avenue between L101 and west of 43rd
Avenue are owned by the City of Glendale and were constructed to Glendale
standards. The existing traffic signals along Glendale Avenue between 43rd Avenue
and west of I-17 are owned by the City of Phoenix and were constructed to Phoenix
standards. Both cities will continue to maintain existing operations and maintenance
responsibilities of their own traffic signals. The new City of Phoenix detection
infrastructure installed at the four signalized intersections will be owned and
maintained by Phoenix and the new City of Glendale detection infrastructure installed
at the remaining 15 signalized intersections will be owned and maintained by
Glendale.
Contract Term
This agreement will become effective as of the date it is approved by all of the parties
and remain in effect until all stipulations included in the agreement have been satisfied.
The agreement may be amended upon written agreement by all parties.
Financial Impact
The project will be funded from local and federal funds through the utilization of the
MAG Transportation Improvement Program Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Improvement funds. The estimated construction cost is $904,860, which is made up of
federal funds of $853,282, and local matches from the City of Glendale of $51,578 and
the City of Phoenix of approximately $13,365.
Location
Along Glendale Avenue at 27th, 35th, 39th and 43rd avenues.
Council District: 5
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 417
Report
Vehicle Detection Along Glendale Avenue (Ordinance S-48845)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Glendale for the installation of upgraded
vehicle detection at four signalized intersections along Glendale Avenue from 43rd to
27th avenues. Further request to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42
-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. Additionally, request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of this agreement
will not exceed $13,365.
Summary
In association with the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) System
Management and Operations Plan, Phoenix intends to permit the City of Glendale to
utilize Phoenix right-of-way to install vehicle detection system upgrades at four City of
Phoenix signalized intersections along the Glendale Avenue roadway corridor. The
project will be funded from local and federal funds through the utilization of the MAG
Transportation Improvement Program Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Improvement funds. The estimated construction cost is $904,860, which is made up of
$853,282 of federal funds, and local matches from the City of Glendale of $51,578 and
the City of Phoenix of $13,365.
The detection upgrades are to be installed at 19 signalized intersections along
Glendale Avenue, with 4 signals (27th, 35th, 39th and 43rd avenues) located within the
Agua Fria Freeway (L101) to Interstate 17 (I-17). The project includes the removal of
existing video detection, removal of existing loop detection at all signals, and
installation of new signal detection mounted on the signals within the project limits. The
new advanced detection is to be installed preferably on all four approaches, but if
restraints are presented, the detection must at least be installed on the two Glendale
Avenue approaches. The use of Phoenix right-of-way is limited to the installation of the
detection only and does not include access for the purpose of maintenance or
operations.
Page 416
The existing traffic signals along Glendale Avenue between L101 and west of 43rd
Avenue are owned by the City of Glendale and were constructed to Glendale
standards. The existing traffic signals along Glendale Avenue between 43rd Avenue
and west of I-17 are owned by the City of Phoenix and were constructed to Phoenix
standards. Both cities will continue to maintain existing operations and maintenance
responsibilities of their own traffic signals. The new City of Phoenix detection
infrastructure installed at the four signalized intersections will be owned and
maintained by Phoenix and the new City of Glendale detection infrastructure installed
at the remaining 15 signalized intersections will be owned and maintained by
Glendale.
Contract Term
This agreement will become effective as of the date it is approved by all of the parties
and remain in effect until all stipulations included in the agreement have been satisfied.
The agreement may be amended upon written agreement by all parties.
Financial Impact
The project will be funded from local and federal funds through the utilization of the
MAG Transportation Improvement Program Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Improvement funds. The estimated construction cost is $904,860, which is made up of
federal funds of $853,282, and local matches from the City of Glendale of $51,578 and
the City of Phoenix of approximately $13,365.
Location
Along Glendale Avenue at 27th, 35th, 39th and 43rd avenues.
Council District: 5
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 417
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with Murphy Elementary School District for the
Installation of a Pedestrian Signal on Buckeye Road East of 33rd Avenue
(Ordinance S-48868)
Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Murphy Elementary School District for funding
participation on the installation of a new pedestrian signal on Buckeye Road east of
33rd Avenue. Further request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to
Phoenix City Code section 42-20 to authorize indemnification and assumption of
liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-
18. Additionally, request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The City is anticipated to receive
approximately $300,000 from this agreement.
Summary
The Street Transportation Department is partnering with the Murphy Elementary
School District to design and construct a High Intensity Activated CrossWalK (HAWK)
pedestrian signal on Buckeye Road east of 33rd Avenue. The school district has
agreed to contribute the construction costs associated with the new pedestrian signal.
The project is currently under design with construction planned in 2023.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022 and remain in effect until the project
is completed.
Financial Impact
The Murphy Elementary School District has agreed to fund construction costs
associated with the new pedestrian signal. The school district will be invoiced a not-to-
exceed amount up to $300,000, which will be provided to them upon the completion of
design. The City has agreed to pay for design estimated at $10,000 and any additional
costs above the not-to-exceed amount provided by the school district.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program.
Page 418
Location
Buckeye Road east of 33rd Avenue.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 419
Report
Installation of a Pedestrian Signal on Buckeye Road East of 33rd Avenue
(Ordinance S-48868)
Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Murphy Elementary School District for funding
participation on the installation of a new pedestrian signal on Buckeye Road east of
33rd Avenue. Further request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to
Phoenix City Code section 42-20 to authorize indemnification and assumption of
liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-
18. Additionally, request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The City is anticipated to receive
approximately $300,000 from this agreement.
Summary
The Street Transportation Department is partnering with the Murphy Elementary
School District to design and construct a High Intensity Activated CrossWalK (HAWK)
pedestrian signal on Buckeye Road east of 33rd Avenue. The school district has
agreed to contribute the construction costs associated with the new pedestrian signal.
The project is currently under design with construction planned in 2023.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022 and remain in effect until the project
is completed.
Financial Impact
The Murphy Elementary School District has agreed to fund construction costs
associated with the new pedestrian signal. The school district will be invoiced a not-to-
exceed amount up to $300,000, which will be provided to them upon the completion of
design. The City has agreed to pay for design estimated at $10,000 and any additional
costs above the not-to-exceed amount provided by the school district.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program.
Page 418
Location
Buckeye Road east of 33rd Avenue.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 419
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with Paradise Valley Unified School District for the
Installation of a Traffic Control Device at 28th Street and Shea Boulevard
(Ordinance S-48874)
Request the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Intergovernmental
Agreement with the Paradise Valley Unified School District for funding participation on
the installation of a traffic control device at 28th Street and Shea Boulevard. Further
request to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-20 to
authorize indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18. Additionally, request to authorize the
City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The City is anticipated to receive approximately $300,000 from this agreement.
Summary
The Street Transportation Department is partnering with the Paradise Valley Unified
School District to design and construct a traffic control device at 28th Street and Shea
Boulevard. The school district has agreed to contribute approximately $300,000
towards the project costs. The City will also design and construct a median on Shea
Boulevard between 27th and 30th streets as part of this project, which will be funded
by the Street Transportation Department. The project will begin design in Fiscal Year
(FY) 2023.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022 and remain in effect until the project
is completed.
Financial Impact
The Paradise Valley Unified School District has agreed to contribute approximately
$300,000 towards the cost of the project. The City will cover all other remaining costs
associated with this project.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program.
Page 420
Location
28th Street and Shea Boulevard
Council District: 3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 421
Report
Installation of a Traffic Control Device at 28th Street and Shea Boulevard
(Ordinance S-48874)
Request the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Intergovernmental
Agreement with the Paradise Valley Unified School District for funding participation on
the installation of a traffic control device at 28th Street and Shea Boulevard. Further
request to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-20 to
authorize indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18. Additionally, request to authorize the
City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The City is anticipated to receive approximately $300,000 from this agreement.
Summary
The Street Transportation Department is partnering with the Paradise Valley Unified
School District to design and construct a traffic control device at 28th Street and Shea
Boulevard. The school district has agreed to contribute approximately $300,000
towards the project costs. The City will also design and construct a median on Shea
Boulevard between 27th and 30th streets as part of this project, which will be funded
by the Street Transportation Department. The project will begin design in Fiscal Year
(FY) 2023.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022 and remain in effect until the project
is completed.
Financial Impact
The Paradise Valley Unified School District has agreed to contribute approximately
$300,000 towards the cost of the project. The City will cover all other remaining costs
associated with this project.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program.
Page 420
Location
28th Street and Shea Boulevard
Council District: 3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 421
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with Gila River Indian Community for Sidewalk
Improvements Along Baseline Road from 83rd to 75th Avenues (Ordinance S-
48876)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Gila River Indian Community for sidewalk
improvements along Baseline Road from 83rd to 75th avenues. Further request to
grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-20 to authorize
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18. There is no financial impact to the City
of Phoenix.
Summary
The Street Transportation Department is collaborating with the Gila River Indian
Community (GRIC) on a federal safety grant award that GRIC received to build a
sidewalk along Baseline Road from 83rd to 75th avenues. Since members of the GRIC
community walk and bike to the transit stop located near Baseline Road and 75th
Avenue within City of Phoenix limits, GRIC wanted to make sure safety improvements
were done on Baseline Road from 83rd to 75th avenues. The eastern limits of the
GRIC project contain about 0.2 miles of City right-of-way. The Intergovernmental
Agreement will describe the roles and responsibilities of this partnership, and the
project will be managed and lead entirely by the GRIC. See Attachment A for project
limits and jurisdictional boundaries. The project is in design now with construction
planned in early 2023.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022 and remain in effect until the project
is completed.
Financial Impact
The GRIC will serve as the lead agency and will fund all costs associated with this
project, including design, construction and maintenance of the sidewalk. There is no
financial impact to the City of Phoenix.
Page 422
Location
Along Baseline Road, 83rd to 75th avenues.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 423
Attachment A
Page 424
Report
Improvements Along Baseline Road from 83rd to 75th Avenues (Ordinance S-
48876)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Gila River Indian Community for sidewalk
improvements along Baseline Road from 83rd to 75th avenues. Further request to
grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-20 to authorize
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18. There is no financial impact to the City
of Phoenix.
Summary
The Street Transportation Department is collaborating with the Gila River Indian
Community (GRIC) on a federal safety grant award that GRIC received to build a
sidewalk along Baseline Road from 83rd to 75th avenues. Since members of the GRIC
community walk and bike to the transit stop located near Baseline Road and 75th
Avenue within City of Phoenix limits, GRIC wanted to make sure safety improvements
were done on Baseline Road from 83rd to 75th avenues. The eastern limits of the
GRIC project contain about 0.2 miles of City right-of-way. The Intergovernmental
Agreement will describe the roles and responsibilities of this partnership, and the
project will be managed and lead entirely by the GRIC. See Attachment A for project
limits and jurisdictional boundaries. The project is in design now with construction
planned in early 2023.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022 and remain in effect until the project
is completed.
Financial Impact
The GRIC will serve as the lead agency and will fund all costs associated with this
project, including design, construction and maintenance of the sidewalk. There is no
financial impact to the City of Phoenix.
Page 422
Location
Along Baseline Road, 83rd to 75th avenues.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 423
Attachment A
Page 424
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Support for Formation of Medlock Place Irrigation Water Delivery District
(Resolution 22037)
Request to adopt a resolution to support formation of the Medlock Place Irrigation
Water Delivery District through Maricopa County. The proposed Irrigation Water
Delivery District includes the single-family residential properties bounded by Pasadena
Avenue to the south, Missouri Avenue to the north, 7th Avenue and 3rd Avenue to the
west, and Central Avenue to the east. This action has no financial impact to the City of
Phoenix.
Summary
Under the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) Chapter 20, Title 48,
Irrigation Water Delivery Districts (IWDD), when the majority of the lot or parcel owners
entitled to or capable of receiving irrigation water from the same system want irrigation
water delivered to their lands, they may propose organization of an IWDD. Maricopa
County requires that applicants for an IWDD within City of Phoenix boundaries obtain
establishing a district.
If approved by the City Council, landowning neighbors seeking an IWDD complete a
special taxation impact statement and submit this document to the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors, along with Salt River Project (SRP),
will decide if a petition to organize an IWDD may be circulated. See Attachment A for
the Consent from SRP to the Board of Supervisors and map of the SRP delivery
system.
This request has been reviewed by the Street Transportation and Water Services
departments.
Financial Impact
This action has no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.
Public Outreach
On Mar. 29, 2022, the City received a formal written request from City of Phoenix
resident Richard Mountjoy, representative for the Medlock Place neighborhood, to
Page 425
pursue City Council approval to form an IWDD with Maricopa County (Attachment B).
Location
The proposed IWDD includes the single-family residential properties bounded by
Pasadena Avenue to the south, Missouri Avenue to the north, 7th Avenue and 3rd
Avenue to the west, and Central Avenue to the east.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Street Transportation and Water Services departments.
Page 426
Attachment A – Consent from SRP to Board of Supervisors and Map of SRP
Delivery System
Page 427
Page 428
56-4
0-0
01T 156-4 156-43-041 156-43-007
56-4
0-0
01P 3-106 156-43
-074 156-43 156-43-025 156-43-006
-059 156-43-040
156- 156-4
43-1 3-094 156-43-073
05 156-4
3-060 156-43-03 156-43-02 156-43-0
6 05
/ 156-4 156-4 1 156-4
3-104 3-095 56-43-072 3-06
1 156-43-038
156-43-0 156-43-004
156-4 156-4 1 156-43
3-096 56-43-071 -037
3-103 156-43
-
0 156-4
3 -0
56-4
0-0
01W
156-4 156-43 1
56-43-0
3-102 156-43-035 156-43-036
-097 156-43
-070 29
56-43-002
N8
thA
ve
6-4
3-1
156-43-
A
156-43-
101 098 156-43-069
56-4
W
156-43-001A
-0
C
o
1 1
N
lte
rS
-4
t
0-0
-03
01M WM
W
-43
56 is
sou
156-43-0
-4
riA
99 1
6-4
3 156
-0
-0
0 v
156-43-100 68
1X e
Ore 156-43-031
go 156-43-033
nA
156-43-121 ve
156-43-124
W 1
56-4
3-0
66A
156-43-123
156-43-122
156-43-034 156-43-062
156-43-063
156-43-032 156-43-064
Ge
o 1
56-4
3-0
67A
rg 1
56-3
3-1
33B
v
iaAe
N7
T HA
VE
62-2
7-1
01A 162-27-085A 16
2 7
-2-0
75A 162-27-058A 162-27-046A 1
62-2
7-0
162-27-077A 162-27-052B
62-2
7-0
97 162-27-087 1
62-2
7-0
71 1
62-2
7-0
4 6
412-2
7-0
62-2
6-008
C 162-27 -059 162-29-001A
62-2
7-1
03 162-27-089 1
62-2
7-0
70 16-2
2 7-0
60 162-27-052C 1
62-2
7-0
4 6
012-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
62-2
62-27
-063
6-0
10A
62 7
-2 9
-09 162-27-092 1
62 7
-2 7
-04 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
1 62-27 -051
0 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
12-2
7-0
96 162-27-091 1
62-2
7-0
62 7
-2 5
-05 6
12-2
7-0
3 6
812 7
-2 3
-05
62-2
6-0
03 1
62-2
6-0
08A
62-2
7-0
62-2
62-2
7-0
-0
62-2
7-0
C
62-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
2-26-0
08D
62-2
7-0
94 1
62 7
-2 7
-08 6
212-2
7-0
62-2
7-1
02162-27-093 162-2
7-072 1
62 7
-2-0
5 1
62-2
7-0
3 6
912-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
62-2
7-0
12-2
6-0
05B 1
62-2
7-1
00162-27-084 6
12-27 6
-09 162-2
7-0651 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
62-27-0
62-2
7-0
76 N5thLn
62-2
7-0
95 6
12 7
-2 6
-06 12
6-27-04
6 16
2-2
7-0
162-29-085 5thLn N5thDr 162-29-100
50 1
62-2
7-0
90 1
62-2
7 8
-01 162-2
7 -050 1
62-27
-041
62-2
6-0
04B 62 7
-2 6
-08 1
62-27-049 162
-27-0
62-2
7-0
W
8162-27-086
V
62-2
7-0
P
H O
ENIX erm
ontA
ve
62-27-0
57 16
2-2
7-0
N5
thA
ve
162-26-020
62-2
6-0
4 6
312 6
-2 4
-02 1
62-2
7-1
59 162-27-119A 162-27-110D 1
62-2
7-1
162-29-084 162-29-102 162-29-101 16
2-2
9-0
62-2
7-1
21 16
2-2
7-1
14 162-27-109A
00 1
62-2
6-0
33 162-26-021 1
62-2
7-1
12 7
-2 6
-10 1
62-2
7-1
12 162-27-110E 1
62 7
-2 0
-17
12 6
-2 4
-01 1
62 7
-2 2
-13 6
12-2
7-1
16 162 -27-108
62-2
6-0
44 162-26-022
62-2
7-1
61 1
62-2
7-1 162-27-110B
-27-1
20 1
62-2
7-1
162-27-109B
62-2
6-0
31 162-26-023
62-27
-122
1 62 -2 9-1
0 4 1 62-29-105 162-29-007D
62-2
6-0
90 -2
7-1
62-2
7-1
62-2
7-1
11 162-27-110C
62-2
6-0
45 1
62-2
6-0
4 6
0 12 6
-2 3
-04A 6
12 7
-2 2
-15
62-2
7-1
N4th
162-26-024 16
2-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
26 1
62-2
7-0
01 Av
e
62-2
6-0
30 62-2
7-0
20 1
62-2
7-0
12A 162-27-002
62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
46 162-26-025 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
39 1
62-2
7-0
1 6
812-2
7-0
12 6
-2 3
-0 6
6 12 6
-2-0
29 6
12 7
-2 2
-04 162-27-010E
162-26-026 1
62-2
7-0
23 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
47 1
62-2
7-0
22 162-27-005B
62-2
6-0
37 1
62-2
6-0
28 162-26-027 1
62-2
7-0
21 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
38 62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
,00
0 N3
rdA
ve
62-2
5-0
37 162-25-134
62-2
3-0
31E 1
62-2
3-0
29A 1
62-2
3-0
62 162-23-061A 1
62-2
5-0
62-2
8-1
62-2
3-0
01 162-23-087A 61
62-2
5-0
69 162-25-036A
WCo
lte
rSt WO
N2 n d
re
gonA W
-25-0
ve Ge
org
iaA
ve WMis
sou
ri A
ve
Dr 162-25-146
162-25-057D 162-25-057G 162-25-057F
62-25
-034
WDn
e n
to
162-23-032A 1
62-2
3-0
27 6
12 3
-2 0
-03 162-23-085 6
12-2
3-0
62-2
3-0
59 1
62 5
-2 7
-08 162-25-092
62-2
5-0
68 1
62-25-0
321 62
-25-030
162-25
-031 Ln
-25-0291 6
2-25-02
162-23-033A 12 3
-2-0
26 6
12-2
3-0
04 162-23-084 1
62-2
3 6
-041
62-2
3 5
-08 6
12 5
-2 7
-0 6
912 5
-2-0
62 162-25-142
62-2
5-1
62-25-0
162-25-138
62-25-0
62-2
5-0
74 162-2
5-026 1
62-2
5-129AW 1
62 5
-2 4
-04C
162-23-034A 12 3
-2-0
25 1
62-2
3-0
05 162-23-083 6
12-2
3 6
-051
62-2
3-0
57 6
12-2
5 8
-00 162-25-022A
62-2
5-0
66 1
62-2
5-0
M
edlo
ckP
laceIW
DD
62-2
5-3
162-23-035A
,50
62 3
-2 0
-06 162-23-082 1
62 3
-2 6
-0 6
612-2
3-0
56 1
62-2
5-0
8 6
112 5
-2 7
-01 1
62-2
5-0
2 6
112 5
-2 2
-00 Vic
toriaS
q
62 5
-2 7
-05 6
12 5
-2 1
-0 6
912 5
-2 1
-08
N2
ndA
ve
62-2
3-0
36 1
62-2
3-0
07 162-23-081 1
62-2
3-0
6 6
712-2
3 5
-05 1
62-2
5-0
62-2
5-0
17 162-25-105
62-2
5-0
70 16
2-2
5-0
16 162-28-030
62-2
3-0
3 6
7 12 3
-2 2
-02 1
62-2
3-0
08 162-23-080 1
62-2
3-0
62-2
3-0
54 6
12 5
-2 8
-03A
62-2
5-0
1 6
512-2
5-0
14 N1
stD
r
WMe
dlo
ckD
r
62-2
5-0
WP
asad
enaA
ve
62 3
-2 3
-08 6
12 3
-2 6
-0 6
12 5
-2 1
-0 6
312 5
-2 1
-02
62-2
3-0
09 162-23-079 91
62 3
-2 5
-03 1
62 5
-2 8
-04 WCe
ntra
l
62-2
5-0
62-2
5-0
1 6
112-2
5-0
,00
0 1
62-2
3-0
3 P
62-2
8-0
27A
9 12 3
-2-0
20 1
62 3
-2 1
-00 162-23-078 1
62-2
3-0
62-2
3-0
52 6
12 5
-2 8
-05
ark
62-2
5-0
72 162-25-008A N1
stA
ve
162-25-009A 1
62-2
5-0
Fee
t 1
62-2
3-0
62-2
3-0
19 1
62 3
-2 1
-01 162-23-077 1
62-2
3-0
71 6
12-2
5-0
8 6
612 5
-2 6
-05 16
2-2
5-0
62-2
5-0
162-23-050
162-23-042C
62-2
5-0
62-2
3-0
45A 1
62-2
3-0
73A
62-2
5-0
62-2
8-0
25A
62-2
3-0
46F 1
62 3
-2 1
-05 6
12 3
-2-0
14B 6
12-2
3 1
-02A 6
12-2
3-0
75B 1
62-2
3-0
76A 6
12 3
-2 7
-04A 6
12-2
3-0
49 1
62-2
3-0
48 6
12 5
-2-0
87A
62-2
5-0
63A 1
62-2
5-0
NC
ENT
R A
LAV
E
162-22-118
162-22-117
162-22-116
162-22-115
162-22-114
162-22-113
62-2
0-0
27 162-22-112
162-22-111
162-22-110
162-22-109
162-22-108
162-22-107
162-22-106
162-22-105
162-22-104
162-22-103
162-22-102
162-22-101
62-2
0-0
162-22-100
162-22-099
162-22-098
62-2
0-0
28B 162-22-097
62-2
2-0
40 1
62-2
2-0
62-2
0-0
52A
162-22-076 162-22-119
62-3
6-0
162-20-024A 1
62-2
2-0
39C 162-22-039A 162-22-092 162-22-081 162-22-087 162-22-086
62-20
-047 162-22-120
162-22-075
-20-0
45 162-2
0-022 162-22-093 162-22-080 162-22-088 162-22-085 162-22-121
162-22-074
L
e g
end 62
162-36-002A
-2
P
arce
ls S
tre
ets -0
2-2
0-0
46 1
62 0
-2 2
-00 1
62-2
2 4
-01 162-22-039B 162-22-073 162-22-094 162-22-079 162-22-089 162-22-084 162-22-122
12 0
-2 4
-0 6
312-2
0-0
44 16
2-20 2
-01 162-22-072 162-22-123
EO
162-22-071 162-22-095 162-22-078 162-22-090 162-22-083 162-22-124
2-2
0-0
42 162-20-017A 1
62-2
2-0
ran
geD
r EC
o
6 162-22-008
lte
rS
162-22-125
t
162-22-070
EM EO
re
162-22-096 162-22-077 162-22-091 162-22-082
edlo
c g
o
62-2
0-0
41 16
2-2
0-0
kD
r nA
v EM
is
sou
162-22-069 162-22-126
e riA
ve
2-20
-039
162-36-003B
12 -2
0-016 1
62-2
2-0
2 162-22-068 1
62-2
2-1
62-2
0- 01A
5 162-22-009
-2
2-0
162-20-015A
2-2
0-0
40 t
A
162-22-067 1
stS
t s
N1tS
62-2
0-03
7 162-20-0
D
ate
:2/2
2/2
62-2
2-0
42 162-22-010
162-22-066 NFu
on ir
inC
ta
162-20-036A 162-22-065 162-22-046
62-2
0-0
35 1
62-2
0-0
62-2
0-0
M
edl1
ockP l0
aceIW
DD
62-2
2-0
35B 162-22-064 162-22-047
12 0
-2 3
-0 6
312-2
0-0
34 1
62-2
0-0
0 6
912-2
0-0
10 1
62 2
-2 4
-03 162-22-011 162-22-063 162-22-048
62-3
6-0
$WWDFKPHQW%5HTXHVW/HWWHUDQG0DS6XEPLWWHGE\0HGORFN3ODFH
To:CityofPhoenix
CC:SaltRiverProject
March29,2022
From:RichardMountjoy
RE:RequestforFormationofIrrigationWaterDeliveryDistrict
DearCityofPhoenix,
WeasaneighborhoodMedlockPlace,arerequestingconsenttoformanIrrigationWater
DeliveryDistrict(IWDD)fromtheCityofPhoenix.ThepurposeofanIWDDistocreatean
equitabledistributionofcostsassociatedwiththeuseandmaintenanceoftheprivate
neighborhoodirrigationsystem.ThisisaccomplishedusinganannualMaricopaCounty
propertyassessment.WeareaskingtheCityofPhoenixtopassthisrequestofresolution,
authorizingtheformationofMedlockPlaceIWDD.
EnclosedyouwillfindSaltRiverProject’sapprovalalongwithmapsoftheproposeddistrict,
legaldescription,andthehomeownerlist.Iwillbetherepresentativefortheproposed
IWDD.OncewereceiveapprovalfromtheCityofPhoenix,anImpactStatementtoform
willbesenttotheMaricopaCountyBoardofSupervisorstomovetheprocessforward.We
appreciateyourattentiontothisrequest.Forquestionspleasecontactmeatthenumber
below.
Sincerely,
RichardMountjoy
44W.ColterSt.
Phoenix,AZ85013
rick.mountjoy@gmail.com
602Ͳ955Ͳ5676
Page 429
EXHIBITA
LEGALDESCRIPTION
AllofTHEPALMS,aCondominiumoftheSoutheastQuarteroftheSouthwestQuarter,ofSection17,
Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtotheRecordin
theOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinDocket13852,Page877,
andreͲrecordedinDocket14005,page984;
TOGETHERWITH
TheWest100feetoftheEast318feetofLot1,Block2,ofEVANSADDITIONTOORANGEWOOD,a
SubdivisionofSection17,Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridian
accordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,
RecordedinBook2ofMaps,Page56;
TOGETHERWITH
TheNorth162.5feetofLot4,Block2,ofEVANSADDITIONTOORANGEWOOD,aSubdivisionofSection
17,Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatof
RecordintheOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook2ofMaps,
Page56;
TOGETHERWITH
TheWest120feetoftheEasthalfoftheEasthalfofLot20,Block2,ofEVANSADDITIONTO
ORANGEWOOD,aSubdivisionofSection17,Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiver
BaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopa
County,Arizona,RecordedinBook2ofMaps,Page56;
TOGETHERWITH
Lots1through47,ofMEDLOCKPLACEAMENDED,aSubdivisionofSection17,Township2North,Range
3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeofthe
CountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook16ofMaps,Page6;
TOGETHERWITH
Lots48through57,Lots62through63,Lot65,andLots68through71,ofSOUTHMEDLOCKPLACE,a
SubdivisionofSection17,Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridian
accordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,
RecordedinBook16ofMaps,Page42;
Page 430
TOGETHERWITH
Lots1through6,andLots9through15,ofORANGEWOODESTATES,aSubdivisionofSection17,
Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatof
RecordintheOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook19ofMaps,
Page47;ExcepttheWest122feetofsaidLot1,andExcepttheWest61feetofsaidLot2,andExcept
theWest130feetofsaidLot6;
TOGETHERWITH
Lot2,andLots4through8,ofBlock1,Lots1through8,ofBlock2,andLots1,2,3,andtheEast18feet
ofLot4,Lot5,andLot7,ofBlock3,ofSOUTHORANGEWOOD,aSubdivisionofSection17,Township2
North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatofRecordinthe
OfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook25ofMaps,Page12;
ExcepttheNorth19feetoftheWest27feetofsaidLot4Block1,andExcepttheNorth19feetofthe
East46.5feetofsaidLot6Block1,andExcepttheEast46.5feetofsaidLot5Block1;
TOGETHERWITH
Lots1through30,ofALDRICHPLACE,aSubdivisionofSection17,Township2North,Range3East,of
theGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeoftheCounty
RecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook26ofMaps,Page9;
TOGETHERWITH
Allof21PASADENA,aHorizontalPropertyRegimeofSection17,Township2North,Range3East,ofthe
GilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeoftheCounty
RecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook281ofMaps,Page42;
Page 431
Page 432
156‐40‐001T 156‐4 156‐43‐041 156‐43‐007
156‐40‐001P 3‐106 156‐43
‐074 156‐43
‐059 156‐43‐040 156‐43‐025 156‐43‐006
156‐4 156‐4 156‐43
3‐1 05 3‐09 4 ‐07 3 156‐4 156‐43‐026 156‐43‐005
3‐060 156‐43‐039
156‐4 156‐4 156‐4 1
3‐104 3‐095 3‐072 56‐43 156‐43‐0
‐061 156‐43‐0
38 27 156‐43‐004
156‐4 156‐4 156‐43 156‐43
3‐103 3‐096 ‐071 ‐037
156‐40‐001W
156‐43
‐028 156‐43‐003
156‐4 156‐4 3
156‐43‐035 156‐43‐036
3‐10 2 ‐0 9 7 156‐43‐070
156‐43
‐029
156‐43‐002
156‐43‐125A
156‐43‐0 N 8th Ave
156‐43‐069
156‐40‐001N
156‐43‐1
156‐40‐001M
156‐43‐001A
W Colter St W Ore
‐43
156‐40‐001X W Missouri Ave
156‐43‐0 ‐03
156‐43‐100 99 156‐43‐068 156‐43‐033 156‐43‐031 0
gon Av
156‐43‐121 e 156‐43‐122
156‐43‐123 156‐43‐124 156‐43‐066A
156‐43‐034 156‐43‐062
156‐43‐063
156‐43‐032 156‐43‐064
156‐43‐067A 156‐33‐133B
W Georgia Ave
N 7TH AVE
162‐27‐101A 162‐27‐085A 162‐27‐075A 162‐27‐058A 162‐27‐046A 162‐27‐032
162‐27‐077A 162‐27‐052B
162‐27‐097 162‐27‐087 162‐27‐071 162‐27‐044 162‐27‐033
162‐26‐008C 162‐27‐059 162‐29‐001A
162‐27‐103 162‐27‐089 162‐27‐070 162‐27‐060 162‐27‐052C 162‐27‐040 162‐27‐030
162‐27‐080
162‐26‐010A
162‐27‐074 162‐27‐063
0 162‐27‐099 162‐27‐092 162‐27‐047 162‐27‐029
162‐27‐051
162‐27‐096 162‐27‐091 162‐27‐083 162‐27‐073
162‐26‐003
162‐27‐061 162‐27‐055 162‐27‐038 162‐27‐035
162‐26‐008A
162‐26‐010C
162‐26‐008D
162‐27‐088 162‐27‐067
162‐27‐094 162‐27‐078 162‐27‐062 162‐27‐054 162‐27‐045 162‐27‐036
162‐27‐072
162‐26‐088
162‐27‐102 162‐27‐093 162‐27‐056 162‐27‐053 162‐27‐039 162‐27‐034
162‐27‐079
162‐26‐005B 162‐27‐100 162‐27‐084 162‐27‐069 162‐27‐065 162‐27‐048 162‐27‐042 162‐27‐031
162‐27‐076 N 5th Ln
250 162‐27‐095
162‐29‐085 5th Ln
162‐27‐064 162‐27‐037
N5thDr 162‐29‐100
162‐27‐066
162‐27‐090 162‐27‐081 162‐27‐050 162‐27‐041
162‐26‐004B
PHOENIX
162‐27‐049 162‐27‐043
W Vermont Ave
162‐27‐098 162‐27‐086 162‐27‐082 162‐27‐068
162‐27‐057 162‐27‐028
N 5th Ave
162‐26‐020
162‐27‐119A
162‐29‐057
162‐27‐159 162‐27‐110D 162‐27‐106
162‐29‐084 162‐29‐102 162‐29‐101
162‐26‐043 162‐26‐042
500 162‐27‐121 162‐27‐114 162‐27‐109A
162‐26‐033 162‐26‐021 162‐27‐118
162‐27‐160 162‐27‐112 162‐27‐110E 162‐27‐107
162‐26‐041 162‐27‐123 162‐27‐116 162‐27‐108
162‐26‐044 162‐26‐022
162‐27‐161 162‐27‐113 162‐27‐110B
162‐27‐120 162‐27‐117
162‐26‐090
162‐27‐109B
162‐29‐104 162‐29‐105 162‐29‐007D
162‐27‐104
162‐26‐031 162‐26‐023 162‐27‐122
162‐27‐110C
162‐26‐045 162‐27‐115 162‐27‐111 162‐27‐105
162‐26‐040 162‐26‐034A 162‐27‐125 N 4th
162‐26‐024 162‐27‐019
162‐26‐030 162‐27‐026 162‐27‐020
162‐27‐001 Ave
162‐27‐027 162‐27‐012A 162‐27‐002
162‐26‐046 162‐26‐025 162‐27‐025
162‐26‐039 162‐27‐018 162‐27‐017
162‐26‐036 162‐26‐029 162‐27‐024 162‐27‐010E
162‐26‐026 162‐27‐023 162‐27‐016 162‐27‐015
162‐26‐047 162‐27‐022 162‐27‐005B
162‐26‐037
162‐26‐089
162‐26‐038 162‐26‐028 162‐26‐027 162‐27‐021 162‐27‐014 162‐27‐013
1,000
N 3rd Ave
162‐25‐037 162‐25‐134
162‐28‐140
162‐23‐031E 162‐23‐029A 162‐23‐062 162‐23‐061A
W Colter St
162‐23‐001 162‐23‐087A 162‐25‐076 162‐25‐069 162‐25‐036A
N 2nd
W Oregon Ave W Georgia Ave W Missouri Ave
162‐25‐035 162‐25‐057D 162‐25‐057G 162‐25‐057F
W Denton Dr 162‐25‐146
162‐25‐034
162‐23‐032A 162‐23‐027 162‐23‐003 162‐23‐085 162‐23‐063 162‐23‐059 162‐25‐078 162‐25‐092
162‐25‐068 162‐25‐032 162‐25‐030
162‐25‐031
Ln
162‐23‐033A 162‐25‐029 162‐25‐027
162‐25‐149
162‐23‐026 162‐23‐004 162‐23‐084 162‐23‐064 162‐23‐058 162‐25‐079 162‐25‐062
162‐25‐138
162‐25‐142
162‐25‐028
162‐25‐025
162‐25‐074 162‐25‐026 162‐25‐044C
162‐25‐129A W
162‐23‐034A
Medlock Place IWDD
162‐23‐025 162‐23‐005 162‐23‐083 162‐23‐065 162‐23‐057 162‐25‐080 162‐25‐022A
1,500 162‐25‐066 162‐25‐023
162‐25‐371
162‐23‐035A 162‐23‐006 162‐23‐082 162‐23‐066 162‐23‐056 162‐25‐081 162‐25‐071 162‐25‐021 162‐25‐020
Victoria Sq
162‐25‐075 162‐25‐019 162‐25‐018
N 2nd Ave
162‐23‐036 162‐23‐007 162‐23‐081 162‐23‐067 162‐23‐055 162‐25‐082
162‐25‐017 162‐25‐105
162‐25‐070 162‐25‐016 162‐28‐030
162‐23‐037 162‐23‐022 162‐23‐008 162‐23‐080 162‐23‐068 162‐23‐054 162‐25‐083A
162‐25‐015 162‐25‐014 N 1st Dr
W Medlock Dr
162‐25‐067
W Pasadena Ave
162‐23‐038 162‐25‐013 162‐25‐012
162‐23‐009 162‐23‐079 162‐23‐069 162‐23‐053 162‐25‐084 W Central
162‐25‐064
162‐25‐011 162‐25‐010
162‐28‐027A
2,000 Park
162‐23‐039 162‐23‐020 162‐23‐010 162‐23‐078 162‐23‐070 162‐23‐052 162‐25‐085
162‐25‐072 162‐25‐008A N 1st Ave
Feet 162‐25‐009A 162‐25‐042
162‐23‐019 162‐23‐011 162‐23‐077 162‐23‐071 162‐23‐051 162‐25‐086 162‐25‐065 162‐25‐005
162‐23‐050
162‐23‐042C 162‐25‐004
162‐25‐003
162‐23‐045A 162‐23‐073A
162‐28‐025A
162‐23‐046F 162‐23‐015 162‐23‐014B 162‐23‐012A 162‐23‐075B 162‐23‐076A 162‐23‐074A 162‐23‐049 162‐23‐048 162‐25‐087A 162‐25‐063A 162‐25‐002 162‐25‐001
N CENTRAL AVE
162‐22‐118
162‐22‐117
162‐22‐116
162‐22‐115
162‐22‐114
162‐22‐113
162‐20‐027 162‐22‐112
162‐22‐111
162‐22‐110
162‐22‐109
162‐22‐108
162‐22‐107
162‐22‐106
162‐22‐105
162‐22‐104
162‐22‐103
162‐22‐102
162‐22‐101
162‐20‐051
162‐22‐100
162‐22‐099
162‐22‐098
162‐20‐028B 162‐22‐097
162‐22‐040 162‐22‐038
162‐20‐052A
162‐36‐001
162‐22‐076 162‐22‐092 162‐22‐081 162‐22‐087 162‐22‐086 162‐22‐119
162‐20‐047 162‐20‐024A 162‐22‐039C 162‐22‐039A
Legend
Parcels Streets 162‐22‐075 162‐22‐120
162‐20‐045 162‐22‐093 162‐22‐080 162‐22‐088 162‐22‐085
162‐22‐037
162‐20‐022 162‐22‐074 162‐22‐121 162‐36‐002A
162‐20‐046 162‐20‐020 162‐22‐041 162‐22‐039B 162‐22‐073 162‐22‐094 162‐22‐079 162‐22‐089 162‐22‐084 162‐22‐122
162‐20‐043 162‐20‐044 162‐20‐021 162‐22‐072 162‐22‐123
162‐22‐095 162‐22‐078 162‐22‐090 162‐22‐083
162‐22‐071 162‐22‐124
E Orange Dr E Colter St
162‐20‐042 162‐20‐017A 162‐22‐026 162‐22‐008
162‐22‐070 162‐22‐096 162‐22‐077 162‐22‐091 162‐22‐082 162‐22‐125
E Medlock Dr E Oregon Ave
162‐20‐041 162‐20‐018
E Missouri Ave
162‐22‐069 162‐22‐126 162‐36‐003B
162‐20‐001A
162‐20‐039 162‐20‐016 162‐22‐068
162‐22‐035A
162‐20‐015A
162‐22‐025 162‐22‐009 162‐22‐127
162‐20‐040
Date: 2/22/2022
162‐22‐067 1st St N 1st St
162‐20‐037 162‐20‐014 162‐22‐066
162‐22‐042 162‐22‐010 N Fountain Cir
Medlock Place IWDD
162‐20‐036A 162‐22‐065 162‐22‐046
162‐20‐035 162‐20‐011 162‐20‐012
162‐22‐035B 162‐22‐064 162‐22‐047
162‐22‐043 162‐22‐011
162‐36‐017
162‐20‐033 162‐20‐034 162‐20‐009 162‐20‐010 162‐22‐063 162‐22‐048
PROPOSEDMEDLOCKPLACEIWDDOWNERSHIPREPORT
2/22/2022
Total Net
Total Total Assessed Assessed
Improvement Assessed Net Value Value Total Average
Count ParcelNo TaxYear OwnerName InCareOf MailingAddress CityStateZip SitusAddress SitusCityZip LandFCV FCV TotalFCV FCV FCV TotalLPV (LPV) (LPV) Acreage LotSize
VALLARINOROBERTA/SARAH
1 162Ͳ27Ͳ023 2022 2012VALLARINOFAMILYTRUST CTR 307WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 307WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $90,300 $361,200 $451,500 $22,575 $22,575 $238,155 $11,908 $11,908 0.225
2 162Ͳ23Ͳ106 2022 21WPASADENALLC 1101WOCOTILLORD PHOENIXAZ85013 21WPASADENAAVE,3 PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.030
3 162Ͳ23Ͳ085 2022 360MAMMOTHLLC 9874ORANGELN ESCONDIDOCA92029 39WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $239,900 $959,700 $1,199,600 $119,960 $119,960 $478,252 $47,825 $47,825 0.446
4 162Ͳ25Ͳ079 2022 38WCOLTERLLC 38WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 38WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $67,500 $270,300 $337,800 $16,890 $16,890 $216,448 $10,822 $10,822 0.340
5 162Ͳ23Ͳ075B 2022 5102NORTHCENTRALLLC 5102NCENTRALAVE PHOENIXAZ85012 5102NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $219,200 $217,700 $436,900 $76,458 $76,458 $231,813 $40,567 $40,567 0.160
CHOIHYUNGS/ABEALYSSON
6 162Ͳ27Ͳ110D 2022 ABECHOITRUST HTR 346WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 346WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $97,300 $389,400 $486,700 $48,670 $48,670 $372,318 $37,232 $37,232 0.228
7 162Ͳ23Ͳ080 2022 ALGARSIMONR/CHEVASSUTSARAHF 21WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 21WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $102,500 $410,100 $512,600 $51,260 $51,260 $343,805 $34,381 $34,381 0.446
8 162Ͳ27Ͳ052B 2022 ALLENMARIES 645WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 645WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $89,700 $358,900 $448,600 $22,430 $22,430 $260,188 $13,009 $13,009 0.394
8 162Ͳ27Ͳ052C 2022 ALLENMARIES 645WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 $236,600 $0 $236,600 $35,490 $35,490 $130,130 $19,520 $19,520 0.186
9 162Ͳ23Ͳ083 2022 ALLISONCLAUDEFIII/KAYL 33WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 33WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $106,000 $424,300 $530,300 $26,515 $26,515 $350,557 $17,528 $17,528 0.446
10 162Ͳ27Ͳ079 2022 ANDREWANDANNABRAHAMTRUST 520WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 520WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $97,900 $391,800 $489,700 $24,485 $24,485 $296,031 $14,802 $14,802 0.229
11 162Ͳ27Ͳ058A 2022 AZADVANCEINVESTINGLLC 5501N7THAVESTE103 PHOENIXAZ85013 698WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $56,000 $224,000 $280,000 $28,000 $28,000 $173,011 $17,301 $17,301 0.162
12 162Ͳ23Ͳ004 2022 BALTUSCORPORATION 201ESOUTHERNAVENO159 APACHEJUNCTIONAZ85119 36WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $130,600 $522,500 $653,100 $65,310 $65,310 $219,846 $21,985 $21,985 0.455
13 162Ͳ27Ͳ063 2022 BAMBRIDGEJACQUELINEMARIE 532WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 532WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $75,000 $300,200 $375,200 $22,887 $22,887 $226,052 $13,789 $13,789 0.183
14 162Ͳ25Ͳ064 2022 BARKERͲDETWILERJUSTINR/THOMASA 31WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 31WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $107,300 $429,200 $536,500 $26,825 $26,825 $319,785 $15,989 $15,989 0.346
15 162Ͳ27Ͳ067 2022 BEARDENMELANIE 523WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 523WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $51,100 $204,400 $255,500 $25,550 $25,550 $158,397 $15,840 $15,840 0.185
16 162Ͳ27Ͳ028 2022 BENDELMARION 540WWILSHIREDR PHOENIXAZ85003 505WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $54,500 $218,200 $272,700 $27,270 $27,270 $170,001 $17,000 $17,000 0.197
17 162Ͳ25Ͳ025 2022 BILBREYBRUCEE/ELLENL 215WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 215WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $71,700 $286,800 $358,500 $17,925 $17,925 $197,261 $9,863 $9,863 0.243
18 162Ͳ23Ͳ090 2022 BILOTASEVE 920EMITCHELLDRUNIT101 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,3 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
19 162Ͳ27Ͳ112 2022 BINDERANDREA/HAROLDM 55SHELBYDRNOB3 SEDONAAZ86336 407WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $52,800 $211,200 $264,000 $26,400 $26,400 $166,651 $16,665 $16,665 0.188
20 162Ͳ25Ͳ013 2022 BISHROGERL 34WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 34WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $81,500 $326,300 $407,800 $40,780 $40,780 $271,112 $27,111 $27,111 0.237
21 162Ͳ25Ͳ015 2022 BRENTONSHAUNG/HARRYSJRTR 44WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 44WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,200 $316,800 $396,000 $39,600 $39,600 $263,135 $26,314 $26,314 0.233
BRIANALEXANDERWORRALLANDREBECCAJEANES
22 162Ͳ23Ͳ022 2022 WORRALLTRUST 23WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ850132001 23WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $125,900 $503,700 $629,600 $31,480 $31,480 $530,703 $26,535 $26,535 0.465
23 162Ͳ23Ͳ095
Page 433 2022 BROOKSBENTLEYY/MONICABTR 1515BOLERODR CARSONCITYNV89703 31WPASADENAAVE,8 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
24 162Ͳ23Ͳ056 2022 BROWNKYLES/AMYE 19WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 19WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $153,500 $614,000 $767,500 $38,375 $38,375 $458,455 $22,923 $22,923 0.437
25 162Ͳ23Ͳ008 2022 BROWNLISAALLISONTR 24WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 24WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $115,200 $461,100 $576,300 $57,630 $57,630 $441,747 $44,175 $44,175 0.455
26 162Ͳ27Ͳ001 2022 BROWNTHOMASJ 335WMISSOURI PHOENIXAZ85013 335WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $94,100 $376,600 $470,700 $47,070 $47,070 $336,861 $33,686 $33,686 0.478
27 162Ͳ27Ͳ119 2022 BRYCKDREWMICHAELGARY 498WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 498WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $80,200 $321,000 $401,200 $40,120 $40,120 $287,108 $28,711 $28,711 0.184
28 162Ͳ23Ͳ054 2022 BURGHARTWILLIAMT/KATHRYNM 15WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 15WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $122,900 $491,700 $614,600 $30,730 $30,730 $355,407 $17,770 $17,770 0.437
DANGCHRISTOPHERT/BUSHU
29 162Ͳ27Ͳ043 2022 BUSHUͲDANGFAMILYTRUST BREANNELTR 502WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 502WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $60,200 $241,000 $301,200 $15,060 $15,060 $188,669 $9,433 $9,433 0.199
30 162Ͳ23Ͳ063 2022 CAMERONSHERRYJ/HARRELL 300WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 40WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $94,800 $379,300 $474,100 $23,705 $23,705 $285,234 $14,262 $14,262 0.432
31 162Ͳ25Ͳ074 2022 CASTANROBERTA/LEHMANNCALEBP 117WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 117WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $74,200 $297,100 $371,300 $37,130 $37,130 $233,143 $23,314 $23,314 0.221
BURGGRAFCHADK/JENNIFER
32 162Ͳ25Ͳ014 2022 CB&JREVOCABLETRUST MARIALARSONTR 45WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 45WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $102,400 $409,900 $512,300 $51,230 $51,230 $348,364 $34,836 $34,836 0.238
33 162Ͳ25Ͳ071 2022 CEIMOCHRISTOPHERJ 73WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 73WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $56,600 $226,600 $283,200 $14,160 $14,160 $184,387 $9,219 $9,219 0.232
34 162Ͳ25Ͳ081 2022 CHAPMANEILYNNJ 20WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 20WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $88,000 $352,100 $440,100 $22,005 $22,005 $284,116 $14,206 $14,206 0.344
35 162Ͳ23Ͳ009 2022 CHIMENEͲWEISSSARAALIZA 20WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 20WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $95,900 $383,700 $479,600 $23,980 $23,980 $348,089 $17,404 $17,404 0.455
MARIACHOPKO/ANNAMARIA
36 162Ͳ25Ͳ027 2022 CHOPKOTRUST LYLYKTR 217WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 217WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $36,800 $286,500 $323,300 $16,165 $11,977 $183,295 $9,165 $4,977 0.122
MARIACHOPKO/ANNAMARIA
36 162Ͳ25Ͳ031 2022 CHOPKOTRUST LYLYKTR 217WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 217WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $34,800 $0 $34,800 $1,740 $1,740 $19,059 $953 $953 0.115
37 162Ͳ23Ͳ065 2022 CIESZKOWSKIKEVINJ/NIGHSWONGERCHANTELLM 34WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 34WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $106,000 $424,200 $530,200 $26,510 $26,510 $391,822 $19,591 $19,591 0.432
38 162Ͳ27Ͳ038 2022 CIESZKOWSKIKEVINJANUSZ 2819BAKERSTUNIT1 SANFRANCISCOCA94123 522WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $57,200 $229,100 $286,300 $14,315 $14,315 $176,259 $8,813 $8,813 0.186
39 162Ͳ23Ͳ049 2022 CIRCLEROADCAPITALLLC 5134NCENTRALAVESTE200 PHOENIXAZ85012 5134NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $318,900 $248,800 $567,700 $99,348 $99,348 $517,734 $90,603 $90,603 0.297
39 162Ͳ23Ͳ050 2022 CIRCLEROADCAPITALLLC 5134NCENTRALAVESTE200 PHOENIXAZ85012 3WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $73,900 $0 $73,900 $12,933 $12,933 $30,945 $5,415 $5,415 0.069
39 162Ͳ23Ͳ051 2022 CIRCLEROADCAPITALLLC 5134NCENTRALAVESTE200 PHOENIXAZ85012 7WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $370,200 $152,700 $522,900 $91,508 $91,508 $249,008 $43,576 $43,576 0.345
40 162Ͳ27Ͳ110C 2022 CLARKRONALDC/PHILOMENAJTR 328WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 328WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $85,000 $340,000 $425,000 $42,500 $42,500 $318,539 $31,854 $31,854 0.214
41 162Ͳ27Ͳ029 2022 COBBLINDAL 533WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 533WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $55,300 $221,400 $276,700 $13,835 $13,835 $175,227 $8,761 $8,761 0.185
42 162Ͳ23Ͳ094 2022 CONKLINJOHNG 6170WEVANSDR GLENDALEAZ85306 31WPASADENAAVE,7 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.020
Page1of5
PROPOSEDMEDLOCKPLACEIWDDOWNERSHIPREPORT
2/22/2022
43 162Ͳ23Ͳ100 2022 CONNEELYMICHAEL 31WPASADENAAVEUNIT13 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,13 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.020
44 162Ͳ27Ͳ060 2022 COOLEDGEJEFFREYW 536WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 536WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,300 $249,200 $311,500 $31,150 $31,150 $203,446 $20,345 $20,345 0.190
45 162Ͳ27Ͳ054 2022 COOPEREARLAANITA 523WVERMONTST PHOENIXAZ85013 523WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $61,800 $247,400 $309,200 $15,460 $15,460 $205,661 $10,283 $10,283 0.189
46 162Ͳ23Ͳ103 2022 COPELANDCIARA 31WPASADENAAVEUNIT16 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,16 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.018
47 162Ͳ27Ͳ059 2022 COULTERPATRICIAJ 540WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 540WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $54,300 $217,400 $271,700 $13,585 $13,585 $171,829 $8,591 $8,591 0.188
48 162Ͳ25Ͳ084 2022 DAVIDONALAN/PAULA 14WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 14WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $103,700 $414,800 $518,500 $25,925 $25,925 $408,221 $20,411 $20,411 0.347
49 162Ͳ23Ͳ052 2022 DESAINTͲANTOINEMARTHATR 11WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 11WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $105,700 $423,000 $528,700 $26,435 $26,435 $379,706 $18,985 $18,985 0.428
50 162Ͳ27Ͳ069 2022 DEGRAWANNEM 519WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 519WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $69,500 $278,200 $347,700 $17,385 $17,385 $229,448 $11,472 $11,472 0.191
DEGRAWRICHARD/REGINAA
51 162Ͳ25Ͳ022A 2022 DEGRAWFAMILYTRUST TR 127WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 127WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $104,500 $418,100 $522,600 $26,130 $26,130 $287,881 $14,394 $14,394 0.358
52 162Ͳ27Ͳ113 2022 DIANAKATHLEENKILBERLIVINGTRUST 335WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 335WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $101,100 $404,500 $505,600 $40,701 $40,701 $168,429 $13,643 $13,643 0.318
JAMESBDONALDSONII
53 162Ͳ25Ͳ075 2022 DIANEANDJBDONALDSONFAMILYTRUST TRUSTEE 50WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 53WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,600 $290,400 $363,000 $36,300 $36,300 $248,396 $24,840 $24,840 0.218
54 162Ͳ27Ͳ012A 2022 DILLEYEVERETTRUSSELL/BRYANTJULIETR 318WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 318WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $116,800 $467,200 $584,000 $29,200 $29,200 $176,705 $8,835 $8,835 0.629
55 162Ͳ23Ͳ087A 2022 DIMATTEOKYLE 45WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 45WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $140,900 $563,800 $704,700 $70,470 $70,470 $553,869 $55,387 $55,387 0.445
56 162Ͳ27Ͳ005B 2022 DINESWILLIAMRV/LEAHC 5302N3RDAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 5302N3RDAVE, PHOENIX85013 $139,300 $557,400 $696,700 $34,835 $34,835 $596,300 $29,815 $29,815 0.364
57 162Ͳ25Ͳ019 2022 DONALDSONJAMESBIITR 50WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 104WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,200 $316,800 $396,000 $39,600 $39,600 $259,441 $25,944 $25,944 0.235
58 162Ͳ25Ͳ017 2022 DONALDSONJAMESBRUCE/DIANEBOAN 50WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 50WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $76,900 $307,900 $384,800 $38,480 $38,480 $260,535 $26,054 $26,054 0.237
59 162Ͳ25Ͳ020 2022 DUNNIGANDIANALOURINE 121WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 121WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $89,400 $357,900 $447,300 $44,730 $44,730 $293,769 $29,377 $29,377 0.241
60 162Ͳ27Ͳ036 2022 EDMONSONKELLYSHEA/DEBRAREAY 523WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 523WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $65,600 $262,500 $328,100 $32,810 $32,810 $233,370 $23,337 $23,337 0.188
61 162Ͳ27Ͳ031 2022 EDWARDSFINANCIALLLC 512WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 513WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $58,700 $235,000 $293,700 $29,370 $29,370 $186,177 $18,618 $18,618 0.182
62 162Ͳ27Ͳ042 2022 EDWARDSTRUST EDWARDSJUDITHANNTR 512WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 512WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $60,900 $243,900 $304,800 $30,480 $30,480 $204,627 $20,463 $20,463 0.186
63 162Ͳ23Ͳ019 2022 EVELANDPROPERTIESINC 15WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 11WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $345,700 $330,800 $676,500 $67,650 $67,650 $459,636 $45,964 $45,964 0.458
63 162Ͳ23Ͳ020 2022 EVELANDPROPERTIESINC 15WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 15WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $348,800 $352,400 $701,200 $70,120 $70,120 $469,240 $46,924 $46,924 0.462
64 162Ͳ27Ͳ071 2022 FITZͲSIMMONSDONALDL POBOX34803 PHOENIXAZ85067 543WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $58,800 $235,400 $294,200 $29,420 $29,420 $201,969 $20,197 $20,197 0.190
65 162Ͳ27Ͳ047 2022 FLADINGKELLYR 528WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 528WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $77,100 $308,600 $385,700 $19,285 $19,285 $222,829 $11,141 $11,141 0.185
BENNETTFREDERICK
66 162Ͳ27Ͳ074 2022 FNBTRUST LEWERS/NANCYJANECOͲTR 533WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 533WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,400 $249,600 $312,000 $15,600 $15,600 $209,504 $10,475 $10,475 0.187
67 162Ͳ23Ͳ003
Page 434 2022 FRAZELLEMELISSALEIGH/KINGPAULERDMAN 38WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 38WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $111,700 $447,100 $558,800 $27,940 $27,940 $365,691 $18,285 $18,285 0.455
68 162Ͳ23Ͳ001 2022 GALVARINSUSANJ/DAVIDA 42WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 42WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $100,400 $457,800 $558,200 $27,910 $27,910 $319,279 $15,964 $15,964 0.393
68 162Ͳ23Ͳ002 2022 GALVARINSUSANJ/DAVIDA 42WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 42WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $13,900 $0 $13,900 $1,390 $1,390 $7,535 $754 $754 0.055
69 162Ͳ27Ͳ073 2022 GANNONMICHAELEDWARD/BRENDARUDE 527WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 527WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $74,100 $296,600 $370,700 $18,535 $18,535 $195,301 $9,765 $9,765 0.190
NORTHERNARIZONA
70 162Ͳ25Ͳ030 2022 GEORGIAAVENUETRUST FIDUCIARIESINCTR 101EGURLEYSTSUITE211 PRESCOTTAZ86301 225WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $77,400 $309,900 $387,300 $38,730 $38,730 $231,519 $23,152 $23,152 0.264
71 162Ͳ23Ͳ064 2022 GOLISCHTARAF/HOFFMANDAREKL 38WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 38WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $176,000 $704,300 $880,300 $44,015 $44,015 $510,592 $25,530 $25,530 0.432
72 162Ͳ23Ͳ107 2022 GORDONTHOMPSONTRUST 21WPASADENAAVEUNIT4 PHOENIXAZ85013 21WPASADENAAVE,4 PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.029
73 162Ͳ23Ͳ089 2022 GRACELIGHTPROPERTIESLLC 214EMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85012 31WPASADENAAVE,2 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
74 162Ͳ25Ͳ009A 2022 GRANTSCOOPERANDRACHELLCOOPERLIVINGTRUST 22WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 22WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $84,300 $337,500 $421,800 $42,180 $42,180 $286,824 $28,682 $28,682 0.267
GREGORYRSMITHANDJENNIFERAROBERTSON
75 162Ͳ27Ͳ045 2022 REVOCABLETRUST 520WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 520WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $71,600 $286,500 $358,100 $35,810 $35,810 $223,351 $22,335 $22,335 0.188
76 162Ͳ23Ͳ098 2022 GROUNDTIFFANYH 31WPASADENAAVE#11 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,11 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
77 162Ͳ25Ͳ012 2022 GUALTIERESAMUEL/PAULA 33WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 33WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $83,200 $333,100 $416,300 $41,630 $41,630 $258,324 $25,832 $25,832 0.240
78 162Ͳ27Ͳ037 2022 HAFFNERERIC 301WPASADENAAVEUNIT9 PHOENIXAZ850132343 509WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,700 $291,100 $363,800 $36,380 $36,380 $250,429 $25,043 $25,043 0.184
79 162Ͳ25Ͳ062 2022 HAGLUNDJOELW&NORMAL 125WOREGON PHOENIXAZ85013 125WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $87,300 $349,500 $436,800 $43,680 $43,680 $304,357 $30,436 $30,436 0.226
80 162Ͳ25Ͳ065 2022 HALLROBERTAS/RUNYONJONATHANBTR 5WOREGON PHOENIXAZ85013 5WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $76,200 $304,900 $381,100 $19,055 $19,055 $252,427 $12,621 $12,621 0.225
81 162Ͳ27Ͳ122 2022 HAMPSONDALEHTR/JUDITHA 1929N18THRD STREATORIL61364 329WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $51,800 $207,500 $259,300 $25,930 $25,930 $159,863 $15,986 $15,986 0.189
82 162Ͳ23Ͳ048 2022 HARRISͲSHCOLNIKPROPERTIESLLC POBOX36842 PHOENIXAZ85067 5144NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $409,900 $199,800 $609,700 $106,698 $106,698 $415,608 $72,731 $72,731 0.297
83 162Ͳ27Ͳ049 2022 HARTERDOUGLASJ 120WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 501WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $70,700 $283,100 $353,800 $17,690 $17,690 $239,349 $11,967 $11,967 0.196
84 162Ͳ25Ͳ023 2022 HARTERJEANNEH 114WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 114WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $71,100 $284,600 $355,700 $17,785 $17,785 $231,962 $11,598 $11,598 0.236
85 162Ͳ25Ͳ072 2022 HAWKINSHREX/REBECCAJTR 21WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85012 21WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $63,900 $255,800 $319,700 $15,985 $15,985 $165,978 $8,299 $8,299 0.236
86 162Ͳ27Ͳ055 2022 HAYDENSHARONLEETR 525WVERMONT PHOENIXAZ85013 525WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,800 $291,400 $364,200 $36,420 $36,420 $246,292 $24,629 $24,629 0.188
87 162Ͳ27Ͳ040 2022 HENRYSUSAN 536WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 536WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $61,700 $246,900 $308,600 $30,860 $30,860 $207,731 $20,773 $20,773 0.191
88 162Ͳ25Ͳ042 2022 HERNANDEZALICIA 13WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 13WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $118,900 $475,900 $594,800 $59,480 $59,480 $408,516 $40,852 $40,852 0.763
88 162Ͳ27Ͳ039 2022 HERNANDEZALICIA 516WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 516WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $64,800 $259,500 $324,300 $32,430 $32,430 $216,595 $21,660 $21,660 0.186
Page2of5
PROPOSEDMEDLOCKPLACEIWDDOWNERSHIPREPORT
2/22/2022
89 162Ͳ27Ͳ117 2022 HINDSDONALDTRENT 334WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 334WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $80,600 $322,700 $403,300 $40,330 $40,330 $275,694 $27,569 $27,569 0.184
90 162Ͳ27Ͳ021 2022 HOIDALTHOMASM 301WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 301WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $83,100 $332,400 $415,500 $20,775 $20,775 $246,065 $12,303 $12,303 0.226
91 162Ͳ23Ͳ061A 2022 JACKSONBILLD/JUANITAG 41WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 41WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $107,100 $428,400 $535,500 $26,775 $26,775 $432,305 $21,615 $21,615 0.440
92 162Ͳ23Ͳ099 2022 JAMESNUBIA 31WPASADENAAVENO12 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,12 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $87,909 $8,791 $8,791 0.019
93 162Ͳ25Ͳ067 2022 JANSONROBERTL/JODEEB 41WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 41WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $113,300 $453,500 $566,800 $56,680 $56,680 $346,907 $34,691 $34,691 0.346
JARAMILLOERNESTGERALD
94 162Ͳ23Ͳ029A 2022 JARAMILLOLIVINGTRUST III/SARALETICIATR 43WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 43WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $101,800 $407,300 $509,100 $25,455 $25,455 $377,934 $18,897 $18,897 0.463
95 162Ͳ23Ͳ104 2022 JEFFERSONJOSHUA 21WPASADENAAVEUNIT1 PHOENIXAZ85013 21WPASADENAAVE,1 PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.030
96 162Ͳ27Ͳ065 2022 JIMENEZFAMILYTRUST JIMENEZTERESAETR 510WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 510WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,700 $266,900 $333,600 $16,680 $16,680 $156,508 $7,825 $7,825 0.185
97 162Ͳ25Ͳ029 2022 JLKTRUST KOHRSJOHNP/LEIGHATR 220WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 220WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $39,300 $0 $39,300 $1,965 $1,965 $20,981 $1,049 $1,049 0.144
97 162Ͳ25Ͳ032 2022 JLKTRUST KOHRSJOHNP/LEIGHATR 220WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 128WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $61,000 $527,900 $588,900 $29,445 $29,445 $354,314 $17,716 $17,716 0.223
97 162Ͳ25Ͳ034 2022 JLKTRUST KOHRSJOHNP/LEIGHATR 220WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 134WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $31,600 $0 $31,600 $1,580 $1,580 $16,844 $842 $842 0.115
98 162Ͳ27Ͳ081 2022 JONLEESCHMITZTRUST 504WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 504WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $78,500 $314,100 $392,600 $19,630 $19,630 $237,531 $11,877 $11,877 0.157
99 162Ͳ23Ͳ093 2022 JONATHANAHILTONFAMILYLIVINGTRUST 1943WMARSHALLAVE PHOENIXAZ85015 31WPASADENAAVE,6 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.018
100 162Ͳ27Ͳ014 2022 JONATHANDKETCHAMLIVINGTRUST 300WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 300WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $110,700 $443,100 $553,800 $55,380 $55,380 $423,734 $42,373 $42,373 0.222
101 162Ͳ23Ͳ097 2022 JONESMALLORY 31WPASADENAAVENO10 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,10 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.020
102 162Ͳ23Ͳ108 2022 JORGENSENJILLIAN 21WPASADENAAVE5 PHOENIXAZ85013 21WPASADENAAVE,5 PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.031
103 162Ͳ23Ͳ074A 2022 KEYSOUTHLIMITEDLIABILITYCOMPANY POBOX69 MANHATTANKS66505 5110NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $405,600 $833,200 $1,238,800 $216,790 $216,790 $908,182 $158,932 $158,932 0.293
103 162Ͳ23Ͳ006 2022 KEYSOUTHLLC 1010WESTLOOPPL MANHATTANKS66502 30WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $116,300 $465,500 $581,800 $58,180 $58,180 $384,304 $38,430 $38,430 0.455
104 162Ͳ25Ͳ069 2022 KHANNADIA/SABEEN/AYAZ 143WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 143WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $82,400 $329,900 $412,300 $41,230 $41,230 $281,420 $28,142 $28,142 0.356
105 162Ͳ27Ͳ025 2022 KOHRSLELANDG/MARIEPTR 311WOREGON PHOENIXAZ85013 311WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $74,900 $299,700 $374,600 $37,460 $37,460 $254,566 $25,457 $25,457 0.232
106 162Ͳ23Ͳ088 2022 KOPECKYVICTORIAANNE 31WPASADENAAVEUNIT1 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,1 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
KROHNBRADLEY
107 162Ͳ27Ͳ120 2022 KROHNFAMILYTRUST A/CATHERINELCOͲTR 4920E.CROCUSDR. SCOTTSDALEAZ85254 333WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,600 $250,400 $313,000 $31,300 $31,300 $204,184 $20,418 $20,418 0.190
108 162Ͳ23Ͳ055 2022 KRUCKENBERGBRIAN/GINA 17WCOLTERSTREET PHOENIXAZ85013 17WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $114,500 $458,300 $572,800 $28,640 $28,640 $291,367 $14,568 $14,568 0.429
109 162Ͳ25Ͳ010 2022 LADOWAMY/ROBERTSAARON 121WORCHIDLN PHOENIXAZ850214538 27WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,100 $264,700 $330,800 $33,080 $33,080 $213,788 $21,379 $21,379 0.241
110 162Ͳ27Ͳ010E 2022 LANGEEDWARDKENNY 310WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 310WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $65,800 $263,500 $329,300 $16,465 $16,465 $197,436 $9,872 $9,872 0.205
111 162Ͳ23Ͳ073A 2022 LATIGOINVESTMENTSLLC 14301N87THSTSUITE119 SCOTTSDALEAZ85260 5120NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $731,900 $921,000 $1,652,900 $289,258 $289,258 $1,211,739 $212,054 $212,054 0.594
112 162Ͳ27Ͳ080
Page 435 2022 LINDREALESTATEHOLDINGSLLC 317WLAWRENCERD PHOENIXAZ85013 538WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $313,800 $0 $313,800 $54,915 $54,915 $149,789 $26,213 $26,213 0.257
LINDNERWILLIAMR/JOAN
113 162Ͳ27Ͳ026 2022 LINDNERTRUST ELLENTR 321WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 321WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $95,400 $381,900 $477,300 $47,730 $47,730 $400,391 $40,039 $40,039 0.235
114 162Ͳ27Ͳ123 2022 LISAPPIERSONTRUST 337WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 337WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $61,600 $246,700 $308,300 $15,415 $15,415 $200,195 $10,010 $10,010 0.185
115 162Ͳ23Ͳ071 2022 LONGMIRELINDAS 14WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85012 14WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $77,200 $308,800 $386,000 $19,300 $19,300 $262,545 $13,127 $13,127 0.432
116 162Ͳ27Ͳ016 2022 LOOPERDIANE 304WOREGON PHOENIXAZ85013 304WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,500 $318,000 $397,500 $19,875 $19,875 $279,682 $13,984 $13,984 0.220
117 162Ͳ27Ͳ044 2022 LOPEZISAACA 648WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 648WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $56,600 $226,400 $283,000 $14,150 $14,150 $180,250 $9,013 $9,013 0.195
118 162Ͳ27Ͳ075A 2022 LOPEZRAMIRO/JASSOPATRICIARAMIREZ 3848SAVONDALEBLVD TOLLESONAZ85353 699WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $69,900 $279,600 $349,500 $34,950 $34,950 $207,237 $20,724 $20,724 0.172
119 162Ͳ27Ͳ013 2022 LOVECCHIOFAMILYTRUST LOVECCHIOFRANK/ANUTR 301WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 301WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $113,800 $455,500 $569,300 $28,465 $28,465 $507,654 $25,383 $25,383 0.223
MARKCLUBAANDKELLYM
120 162Ͳ25Ͳ011 2022 LUBAFAMILYTRUST LUBATRUSTEESS 30WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 30WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $83,700 $334,800 $418,500 $41,850 $41,850 $279,241 $27,924 $27,924 0.236
121 162Ͳ27Ͳ057 2022 MAPELDAVIDE&JANEEKELSEY 500WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 500WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $73,400 $293,600 $367,000 $18,350 $18,350 $246,381 $12,319 $12,319 0.202
122 162Ͳ27Ͳ018 2022 MARONEYJAMES/HORNERANDREA 310WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 310WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,400 $265,700 $332,100 $16,605 $16,605 $221,323 $11,066 $11,066 0.227
MARVINVERNONSIMKINANDGAYLEVERNONSIMKIN
123 162Ͳ25Ͳ068 2022 REVOCABLETRUST 133WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 133WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $105,300 $421,200 $526,500 $52,650 $52,650 $383,335 $38,334 $38,334 0.336
124 162Ͳ27Ͳ104 2022 MARYEHARRILYNELLENREVOCABLELIVINGTRUST 499WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 499WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $99,000 $396,100 $495,100 $49,510 $49,510 $363,314 $36,331 $36,331 0.871
125 162Ͳ27Ͳ109B 2022 MASONJOANJTR 405WVERMONT PHOENIXAZ85013 405WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,400 $317,700 $397,100 $39,710 $39,710 $256,487 $25,649 $25,649 0.273
126 162Ͳ27Ͳ110B 2022 MCCABEMARKC/TRACEYR 334WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 334WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $93,700 $374,900 $468,600 $46,860 $46,860 $372,318 $37,232 $37,232 0.214
127 162Ͳ25Ͳ018 2022 MCDOWELLCLIFFORDWAYNE/NANCYS 105WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 105WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $94,700 $379,000 $473,700 $47,370 $47,370 $402,151 $40,215 $40,215 0.244
128 162Ͳ27Ͳ022 2022 MCLENNANMURDOCKDII 302WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 302WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $93,300 $373,400 $466,700 $23,335 $23,335 $340,702 $17,035 $17,035 0.299
129 162Ͳ23Ͳ084 2022 MEDLOCKMFLLC 6895ECAMELBACKRDSUITE7014 SCOTTSDALEAZ85251 37WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $249,400 $997,800 $1,247,200 $124,720 $124,720 $486,970 $48,697 $48,697 0.446
130 162Ͳ27Ͳ019 2022 MEETZERICHARD 315WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 315WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $76,700 $306,800 $383,500 $38,350 $38,350 $234,620 $23,462 $23,462 0.231
131 162Ͳ27Ͳ030 2022 MELENDREZDOUGLASCLARK 537WMISSOURI PHOENIXAZ85013 537WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,500 $290,100 $362,600 $18,130 $18,130 $211,803 $10,590 $10,590 0.190
132 162Ͳ27Ͳ078 2022 MEYERSMICHAELB/MICHELLER 522WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 522WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $90,300 $361,300 $451,600 $22,580 $22,580 $273,720 $13,686 $13,686 0.231
JOHNSONMICHAELL/LYNDEE
133 162Ͳ25Ͳ080 2022 MICHAEL&LYNDEEJOHNSONTRUST ATR 32WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 32WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $80,800 $323,500 $404,300 $20,215 $20,215 $236,542 $11,827 $11,827 0.343
SOCHACKIMICHAELA/ROBEY
134 162Ͳ23Ͳ066 2022 MICHAELADAMSOCHACKI/SUSANDEVANEROBEYTR SUSANDTR 30WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 30WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $142,300 $569,300 $711,600 $71,160 $71,160 $613,439 $61,344 $61,344 0.432
Page3of5
PROPOSEDMEDLOCKPLACEIWDDOWNERSHIPREPORT
2/22/2022
135 162Ͳ27Ͳ050 2022 MICHAELSDON 515WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 515WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $35,800 $143,300 $179,100 $17,910 $17,910 $162,750 $16,275 $16,275 0.190
136 162Ͳ27Ͳ064 2022 MIKULAJIMI 506WGEORGIA PHOENIXAZ85013 506WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $71,100 $284,500 $355,600 $35,560 $35,560 $238,313 $23,831 $23,831 0.183
137 162Ͳ23Ͳ027 2022 MILLSJEFFREYMICHAEL 39WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 39WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,700 $319,000 $398,700 $19,935 $19,935 $273,033 $13,652 $13,652 0.462
138 162Ͳ27Ͳ066 2022 MORALESHUNTFAMILYTRUST HUNTEVAND/MICHELLEMTR 505WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 505WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $81,700 $326,800 $408,500 $20,425 $20,425 $222,433 $11,122 $11,122 0.184
139 162Ͳ27Ͳ109A 2022 MOREYNATHANP/KERRIANNWAGGENER 417WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 417WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $89,000 $356,200 $445,200 $44,520 $44,520 $318,539 $31,854 $31,854 0.362
140 162Ͳ25Ͳ008A 2022 MORROWLYNNDARCY 21WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 21WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $69,300 $277,200 $346,500 $17,325 $17,325 $225,460 $11,273 $11,273 0.267
141 162Ͳ25Ͳ076 2022 MOUNTJOYRICHARDD/TITELBAUMANNER 44WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 44WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $78,800 $343,000 $421,800 $21,090 $21,090 $234,756 $11,738 $11,738 0.308
141 162Ͳ25Ͳ077 2022 MOUNTJOYRICHARDD/TITELBAUMANNER 44WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 44WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $6,900 $0 $6,900 $345 $345 $3,250 $163 $163 0.027
142 162Ͳ25Ͳ063A 2022 MP5210ͲNORTHVIEW7LLC 5210NCENTRALAVESTE102 PHOENIXAZ85012 5210NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $629,800 $1,408,100 $2,037,900 $356,633 $356,633 $1,266,974 $221,720 $221,720 0.497
142 162Ͳ25Ͳ086 2022 MP5210ͲNORTHVIEW7LLC 5210NCENTRALNO102 PHOENIXAZ85012 10WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $399,600 $0 $399,600 $69,930 $69,930 $245,111 $42,894 $42,894 0.340
142 162Ͳ25Ͳ087A 2022 MP5210ͲNORTHVIEW7LLC 5210NCENTRALNO102 PHOENIXAZ85012 5202NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $523,100 $385,400 $908,500 $158,988 $158,988 $857,063 $149,986 $149,986 0.445
143 162Ͳ27Ͳ083 2022 MULLANYJAMES/LISA 530WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 530WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $85,300 $341,400 $426,700 $21,335 $21,335 $301,106 $15,055 $15,055 0.265
144 162Ͳ23Ͳ102 2022 MUNNELLJENNIFERANN 31WPASADENAAVE#15 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,15 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
145 162Ͳ23Ͳ062 2022 MURPHYBRENDANANDREW 42WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 42WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $90,300 $361,300 $451,600 $22,580 $22,580 $319,575 $15,979 $15,979 0.432
146 162Ͳ27Ͳ121 2022 N/A N/A 343WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 520WOREGONAVE, PHOENIZ85013 $98,500 $394,100 $492,600 $24,630 $24,630 $301,898 $15,095 $15,095 0.341
147 162Ͳ27Ͳ056 2022 NASINGOETEWABERTHA 520WGEORGIA PHOENIXAZ85013 520WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,200 $249,000 $311,200 $31,120 $31,120 $214,675 $21,468 $21,468 0.186
148 162Ͳ27Ͳ082 2022 NEDINJACKIEKAYE 500WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 500WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $73,600 $294,400 $368,000 $18,400 $18,400 $213,877 $10,694 $10,694 0.165
149 162Ͳ27Ͳ070 2022 OGINOLAUREN/HILLSTEVEN 535WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 535WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,600 $250,500 $313,100 $31,310 $31,310 $188,080 $18,808 $18,808 0.191
150 162Ͳ25Ͳ004 2022 OTOOLEDANIELKEVIN/CARLYROSE 16WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 16WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $100,200 $400,800 $501,000 $25,050 $25,050 $292,258 $14,613 $14,613 0.244
151 162Ͳ23Ͳ007 2022 PARKGREGORYTODD 1005WBOULDERLN FLAGSTAFFAZ86001 28WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $126,000 $504,000 $630,000 $63,000 $63,000 $595,760 $59,576 $59,576 0.439
152 162Ͳ23Ͳ010 2022 PASADENAPALMSLLC POBOX4941 SCOTTSDALEAZ85261 16WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $215,800 $863,200 $1,079,000 $107,900 $107,900 $444,271 $44,427 $44,427 0.455
153 162Ͳ25Ͳ070 2022 PATTERSONALICE/QUAMAMYL 45WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 45WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $91,600 $366,500 $458,100 $45,810 $45,810 $297,976 $29,798 $29,798 0.240
154 162Ͳ23Ͳ058 2022 PENNEYFORDROBERT 37WCOLTER PHOENIXAZ85013 37WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $80,300 $321,300 $401,600 $40,160 $40,160 $281,900 $28,190 $28,190 0.430
155 162Ͳ27Ͳ116 2022 PERRYJOHNQ/JOANNAL 404WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 404WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $91,700 $367,000 $458,700 $22,935 $22,935 $373,944 $18,697 $18,697 0.174
156 162Ͳ27Ͳ107 2022 PONSLERKENNETHH 412WVERMONT PHOENIXAZ85013 412WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $58,500 $234,100 $292,600 $29,260 $29,260 $192,216 $19,222 $19,222 0.248
157 162Ͳ27Ͳ106 2022 PROKOPCHAKSTEFFAN/KERRY 420WVERMONT PHOENIXAZ85013 420WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $92,500 $370,300 $462,800 $46,280 $46,280 $357,544 $35,754 $35,754 0.225
RANSOM
158 162Ͳ23Ͳ067 2022 RANSOMREVOCABLELIVINGTRUST TIMOTHY/MARILYNNETR 26WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 26WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $104,400 $417,900 $522,300 $52,230 $52,230 $345,310 $34,531 $34,531 0.432
159 162Ͳ23Ͳ026
Page 436 2022 RAZINNRUSLAN/ERINMARIE 37WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 37WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $151,200 $605,100 $756,300 $37,815 $37,815 $266,386 $13,319 $13,319 0.462
160 162Ͳ27Ͳ118 2022 REASONERCRAIG 406WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 406WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $70,400 $281,800 $352,200 $17,610 $17,610 $199,141 $9,957 $9,957 0.177
161 162Ͳ25Ͳ085 2022 REDELSPERGERTIMOTHYW/HEIDI 14001NCORALGABLESDR PHOENIXAZ85023 12WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $61,700 $246,900 $308,600 $15,430 $15,430 $166,794 $8,340 $8,340 0.343
162 162Ͳ27Ͳ105 2022 REVOCABLELIVINGTRUSTOFRICHARDGGRAMHILL 20343NHAYDENRDSTE105Ͳ11 SCOTTSDALEAZ852553876 408WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $149,300 $597,400 $746,700 $74,670 $74,670 $625,738 $62,574 $62,574 0.422
163 162Ͳ23Ͳ059 2022 ROBRISLEYREVOCABLETRUST 39WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 39WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $117,500 $470,100 $587,600 $29,380 $29,380 $491,949 $24,597 $24,597 0.436
164 162Ͳ25Ͳ021 2022 ROBINETTEJAYCE/CIERA 112WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 112WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,300 $289,500 $361,800 $18,090 $18,090 $250,429 $12,521 $12,521 0.235
165 162Ͳ23Ͳ070 2022 RUIZHECTORGREGORIO/MICHELLEATR 16WMEDLOCK PHOENIXAZ85013 16WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $113,200 $452,800 $566,000 $56,600 $56,600 $418,269 $41,827 $41,827 0.432
166 162Ͳ25Ͳ082 2022 RYANANDHALLIEHOUSETRUST 18WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 18WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $120,900 $483,900 $604,800 $30,240 $30,240 $350,784 $17,539 $17,539 0.337
167 162Ͳ27Ͳ015 2022 RYANMICHAEL/KELLI 305WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 305WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $75,900 $303,600 $379,500 $37,950 $37,950 $265,944 $26,594 $26,594 0.224
168 162Ͳ23Ͳ077 2022 SALVATIERRAHECTORJ/JOANHTR 11WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 11WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $93,400 $373,900 $467,300 $23,365 $23,365 $342,032 $17,102 $17,102 0.446
168 162Ͳ25Ͳ083A 2022 SALVATIERRAHECTOR/JOANTR 11WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 16WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $71,800 $287,200 $359,000 $17,950 $17,950 $230,040 $11,502 $11,502 0.360
169 162Ͳ23Ͳ025 2022 SAPERSTEINMARKK/STELLA 33WPASADENA PHOENIXAZ85013 33WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $166,600 $666,700 $833,300 $41,665 $41,665 $336,861 $16,843 $16,843 0.462
170 162Ͳ23Ͳ057 2022 SCHANTZTIMOTHYSCOTT/MARANICOLETR 29WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 29WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $173,500 $694,100 $867,600 $86,760 $86,760 $661,814 $66,181 $66,181 0.434
171 162Ͳ25Ͳ003 2022 SCHILLERCYNTHIAA 10WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 10WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $76,800 $307,500 $384,300 $38,430 $38,430 $258,998 $25,900 $25,900 0.248
172 162Ͳ25Ͳ035 2022 SCHMITTKENDRA 4129N35THWY PHOENIXAZ85018 228WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $21,500 $0 $21,500 $2,150 $2,150 $13,297 $1,330 $1,330 0.120
172 162Ͳ25Ͳ037 2022 SCHMITTKENDRA 4129N35THWY PHOENIXAZ85018 228WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $43,200 $258,900 $302,100 $30,210 $30,210 $187,488 $18,749 $18,749 0.242
173 162Ͳ27Ͳ062 2022 SCHOUTENGREGORYT/THERESEM 524WGEORGIA PHOENIXAZ85013 524WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $91,300 $365,200 $456,500 $22,825 $22,825 $399,194 $19,960 $19,960 0.185
174 162Ͳ23Ͳ109 2022 SENSALIVINGTRUST WILKINSBRIANNAKTR 21WPASADENAAVEUNIT6 PHOENIXAZ85013 21WPASADENAAVE,6 PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.027
175 162Ͳ27Ͳ034 2022 SHAPPEECHRISTIAN 519WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 519WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $64,400 $257,900 $322,300 $16,115 $16,115 $215,266 $10,763 $10,763 0.185
176 162Ͳ23Ͳ081 2022 SHERITINTRUST MARTINTURNERB/SHERITTR 25WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 25WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $107,900 $431,700 $539,600 $53,960 $53,960 $353,113 $35,311 $35,311 0.446
177 162Ͳ23Ͳ101 2022 SHOUPJULIE 31WPASADENAAVENO14 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,14 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.017
178 162Ͳ23Ͳ011 2022 SHULTSANDPACHECOTR/ANITAHBIEDERMANNTR 1998PACIFICAVENUEAPT104 SANFRANCISCOCA94109 5070NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85013 $478,900 $22,400 $501,300 $87,728 $87,728 $316,767 $55,434 $55,434 0.455
179 162Ͳ23Ͳ078 2022 SILVIAKATHLEENWOODLOCKLIVINGTRUST 15WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 15WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $102,700 $411,100 $513,800 $51,380 $51,380 $379,161 $37,916 $37,916 0.446
180 162Ͳ27Ͳ061 2022 SMITHRYAN/MELISSA 528WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 528WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $78,300 $313,200 $391,500 $39,150 $39,150 $248,952 $24,895 $24,895 0.182
181 162Ͳ25Ͳ001 2022 SSTINVESTMENTSLLC AZIMQHOWARDLLC 5300NCENTRALAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 5300NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $562,900 $1,045,600 $1,608,500 $281,488 $281,488 $1,116,836 $195,446 $195,446 0.495
181 162Ͳ25Ͳ002 2022 SSTINVESTMENTSLLC AZIMQHOWARDLLC 5300NCENTRALAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 5242NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $271,500 $0 $271,500 $47,513 $47,513 $159,122 $27,846 $27,846 0.239
Page4of5
PROPOSEDMEDLOCKPLACEIWDDOWNERSHIPREPORT
2/22/2022
181 162Ͳ25Ͳ005 2022 SSTINVESTMENTSLLC AZIMQHOWARDLLC 5300NCENTRALAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 15WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $267,800 $0 $267,800 $46,865 $46,865 $156,906 $27,459 $27,459 0.236
182 162Ͳ27Ͳ048 2022 STAEBELLNICHOLAS/ALISON 519WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 519WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,000 $264,100 $330,100 $16,505 $16,505 $215,266 $10,763 $10,763 0.191
183 162Ͳ27Ͳ110E 2022 STENDERCRAIG/SUZANNE 340WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 340WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $83,600 $334,600 $418,200 $41,820 $41,820 $305,058 $30,506 $30,506 0.216
184 162Ͳ27Ͳ076 2022 STIGERSKARENL 506WOREGON PHOENIXAZ85013 506WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $65,800 $263,500 $329,300 $16,465 $16,465 $222,654 $11,133 $11,133 0.168
185 162Ͳ27Ͳ051 2022 STROHLJOHNJ&MARYSUE 531WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 531WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $58,100 $232,700 $290,800 $14,540 $14,540 $156,993 $7,850 $7,850 0.193
186 162Ͳ25Ͳ036A 2022 SWANSONAMANDAM 227WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 227WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $104,700 $419,100 $523,800 $26,190 $26,190 $403,346 $20,167 $20,167 0.342
187 162Ͳ23Ͳ069 2022 TAVLARIDESTHEODORE 518WELCAMINODR PHOENIXAZ85021 18WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $66,200 $264,900 $331,100 $33,110 $33,110 $216,890 $21,689 $21,689 0.432
188 162Ͳ23Ͳ092 2022 TENNEYWARRENJOHN 31WPASADENAAVEUNIT5 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,5 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
189 162Ͳ23Ͳ005 2022 TEPPERTRACY 34WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 34WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $130,000 $520,300 $650,300 $32,515 $32,515 $513,861 $25,693 $25,693 0.455
190 162Ͳ23Ͳ068 2022 THOMASMOLLY 20WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 20WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $128,300 $513,200 $641,500 $32,075 $32,075 $504,551 $25,228 $25,228 0.432
191 162Ͳ23Ͳ105 2022 TRACYLPANGLIVINGTRUST PANGTRACY/EGANSTEVETR 2095TANGERINECT PALMSPRINGSCA92262 21WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.029
192 162Ͳ23Ͳ096 2022 TREATRUST/MIHALOVICHJOHN 23260N73RDPL SCOTTSDALEAZ85255 31WPASADENAAVE,9 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.018
193 162Ͳ27Ͳ068 2022 TRIPLETHREATHOMESLLC 3202WCOUNTRYGABLESDR PHOENIXAZ85053 501WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $81,700 $327,100 $408,800 $40,880 $40,880 $320,255 $32,026 $32,026 0.238
194 162Ͳ23Ͳ091 2022 TURNERERIN 31WPASADENAAVEUNIT4 PHOENIXAZ850132051 31WPASADENAAVE,4 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
195 162Ͳ23Ͳ076A 2022 UPTOWNERENTALSLLC 11221N31STPL PHOENIXAZ85020 5104NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $218,000 $133,600 $351,600 $61,530 $61,530 $229,891 $40,231 $40,231 0.159
196 162Ͳ27Ͳ072 2022 VANNORTWICKRACHELL 521WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 521WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,100 $316,500 $395,600 $39,560 $39,560 $283,756 $28,376 $28,376 0.187
VULLOSTEVENMICHAEL/GINA
197 162Ͳ23Ͳ053 2022 VULLOFAMILYREVOCABLETRUST MARIECLAYTR 13WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 13WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $74,000 $296,200 $370,200 $18,510 $18,510 $248,657 $12,433 $12,433 0.432
198 162Ͳ27Ͳ111 2022 WAGGENERAMYLEIGH/JOHNETHRIDGEJR/JANELLE 325WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 325WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,300 $265,300 $331,600 $33,160 $33,160 $215,665 $21,567 $21,567 0.157
199 162Ͳ27Ͳ017 2022 WAGNEREILEENBRILL/MICHAEL 311WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85003 311WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $120,800 $483,300 $604,100 $60,410 $60,410 $510,495 $51,050 $51,050 0.230
200 162Ͳ27Ͳ041 2022 WAGSTAFFKATHERINEJ 506WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 506WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $57,500 $230,100 $287,600 $14,380 $14,380 $184,092 $9,205 $9,205 0.185
201 162Ͳ27Ͳ115 2022 WARBINGTONDOROTHYM/TIMOTHY 330WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 330WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,700 $251,000 $313,700 $31,370 $31,370 $127,979 $12,798 $12,798 0.176
202 162Ͳ27Ͳ108 2022 WARDJOHNR/MELISSAS 413WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 413WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $52,800 $211,200 $264,000 $13,200 $13,200 $202,382 $10,119 $10,119 0.311
203 162Ͳ27Ͳ035 2022 WASKEYBARBARADEE 529WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 529WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $55,600 $222,500 $278,100 $27,810 $27,810 $171,532 $17,153 $17,153 0.184
204 162Ͳ25Ͳ066 2022 WEESJAMESF/PEREZͲJIMENEZZELDTHAVIENA 1111WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 111WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $127,300 $509,200 $636,500 $63,650 $63,650 $594,923 $59,492 $59,492 0.234
205 162Ͳ25Ͳ016 2022 WEFLENROBERTA/CATHERINEE 49WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 49WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $75,600 $302,500 $378,100 $18,905 $18,905 $211,310 $10,566 $10,566 0.242
206 162Ͳ27Ͳ053 2022 WHITECHRISTOPHERA/LAURIEM 4316WSELDONLN GLENDALEAZ85302 521WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,800 $267,400 $334,200 $33,420 $33,420 $222,356 $22,236 $22,236 0.189
207 162Ͳ25Ͳ078 2022 WHITESTEVENA&GERALDINEF 40WCOLTER PHOENIXAZ85013 40WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $82,200 $328,900 $411,100 $20,555 $20,555 $288,175 $14,409 $14,409 0.344
208 162Ͳ27Ͳ020 2022 WIGHTTHOMAS/HUGHESKAREN POBOX256661 CHICAGOIL60625 314WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $103,100 $412,600 $515,700 $25,785 $25,785 $310,797 $15,540 $15,540 0.230
209 162Ͳ23Ͳ082
Page 437 2022 WONGBARRY 29WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 29WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $76,200 $305,000 $381,200 $19,060 $19,060 $269,037 $13,452 $13,452 0.446
210 162Ͳ23Ͳ079 2022 WONGDORIS 17WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 17WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $70,200 $281,000 $351,200 $17,560 $17,560 $218,665 $10,933 $10,933 0.446
211 162Ͳ27Ͳ114 2022 WONGRODINY&SOPHIA 9236N16THPL PHOENIXAZ85020 345WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $64,800 $259,500 $324,300 $32,430 $32,430 $207,582 $20,758 $20,758 0.237
212 162Ͳ27Ͳ002 2022 WOODTRUST WOODRUTHSTR 398WVERMONT PHOENIXAZ85013 398WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,600 $290,700 $363,300 $36,330 $36,330 $233,958 $23,396 $23,396 0.392
213 162Ͳ25Ͳ026 2022 YORKFAMILYTRUST YORKGEORGEATR POBOX10750 PHOENIXAZ85064 120WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $50,700 $284,800 $335,500 $16,775 $16,775 $210,951 $10,548 $10,548 0.231
213 162Ͳ25Ͳ028 2022 YORKFAMILYTRUST YORKGEORGEATR POBOX10750 PHOENIXAZ85064 120WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $20,400 $0 $20,400 $2,040 $2,040 $12,839 $1,284 $1,284 0.093
$24,363,000 $75,229,700 $99,592,700 $8,795,016 $8,790,828 $64,555,332 $5,750,238 $5,746,050 60.913 0.264
Page5of5
Report
(Resolution 22037)
Request to adopt a resolution to support formation of the Medlock Place Irrigation
Water Delivery District through Maricopa County. The proposed Irrigation Water
Delivery District includes the single-family residential properties bounded by Pasadena
Avenue to the south, Missouri Avenue to the north, 7th Avenue and 3rd Avenue to the
west, and Central Avenue to the east. This action has no financial impact to the City of
Phoenix.
Summary
Under the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) Chapter 20, Title 48,
Irrigation Water Delivery Districts (IWDD), when the majority of the lot or parcel owners
entitled to or capable of receiving irrigation water from the same system want irrigation
water delivered to their lands, they may propose organization of an IWDD. Maricopa
County requires that applicants for an IWDD within City of Phoenix boundaries obtain
establishing a district.
If approved by the City Council, landowning neighbors seeking an IWDD complete a
special taxation impact statement and submit this document to the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors, along with Salt River Project (SRP),
will decide if a petition to organize an IWDD may be circulated. See Attachment A for
the Consent from SRP to the Board of Supervisors and map of the SRP delivery
system.
This request has been reviewed by the Street Transportation and Water Services
departments.
Financial Impact
This action has no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.
Public Outreach
On Mar. 29, 2022, the City received a formal written request from City of Phoenix
resident Richard Mountjoy, representative for the Medlock Place neighborhood, to
Page 425
pursue City Council approval to form an IWDD with Maricopa County (Attachment B).
Location
The proposed IWDD includes the single-family residential properties bounded by
Pasadena Avenue to the south, Missouri Avenue to the north, 7th Avenue and 3rd
Avenue to the west, and Central Avenue to the east.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Street Transportation and Water Services departments.
Page 426
Attachment A – Consent from SRP to Board of Supervisors and Map of SRP
Delivery System
Page 427
Page 428
56-4
0-0
01T 156-4 156-43-041 156-43-007
56-4
0-0
01P 3-106 156-43
-074 156-43 156-43-025 156-43-006
-059 156-43-040
156- 156-4
43-1 3-094 156-43-073
05 156-4
3-060 156-43-03 156-43-02 156-43-0
6 05
/ 156-4 156-4 1 156-4
3-104 3-095 56-43-072 3-06
1 156-43-038
156-43-0 156-43-004
156-4 156-4 1 156-43
3-096 56-43-071 -037
3-103 156-43
-
0 156-4
3 -0
56-4
0-0
01W
156-4 156-43 1
56-43-0
3-102 156-43-035 156-43-036
-097 156-43
-070 29
56-43-002
N8
thA
ve
6-4
3-1
156-43-
A
156-43-
101 098 156-43-069
56-4
W
156-43-001A
-0
C
o
1 1
N
lte
rS
-4
t
0-0
-03
01M WM
W
-43
56 is
sou
156-43-0
-4
riA
99 1
6-4
3 156
-0
-0
0 v
156-43-100 68
1X e
Ore 156-43-031
go 156-43-033
nA
156-43-121 ve
156-43-124
W 1
56-4
3-0
66A
156-43-123
156-43-122
156-43-034 156-43-062
156-43-063
156-43-032 156-43-064
Ge
o 1
56-4
3-0
67A
rg 1
56-3
3-1
33B
v
iaAe
N7
T HA
VE
62-2
7-1
01A 162-27-085A 16
2 7
-2-0
75A 162-27-058A 162-27-046A 1
62-2
7-0
162-27-077A 162-27-052B
62-2
7-0
97 162-27-087 1
62-2
7-0
71 1
62-2
7-0
4 6
412-2
7-0
62-2
6-008
C 162-27 -059 162-29-001A
62-2
7-1
03 162-27-089 1
62-2
7-0
70 16-2
2 7-0
60 162-27-052C 1
62-2
7-0
4 6
012-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
62-2
62-27
-063
6-0
10A
62 7
-2 9
-09 162-27-092 1
62 7
-2 7
-04 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
1 62-27 -051
0 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
12-2
7-0
96 162-27-091 1
62-2
7-0
62 7
-2 5
-05 6
12-2
7-0
3 6
812 7
-2 3
-05
62-2
6-0
03 1
62-2
6-0
08A
62-2
7-0
62-2
62-2
7-0
-0
62-2
7-0
C
62-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
2-26-0
08D
62-2
7-0
94 1
62 7
-2 7
-08 6
212-2
7-0
62-2
7-1
02162-27-093 162-2
7-072 1
62 7
-2-0
5 1
62-2
7-0
3 6
912-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
62-2
7-0
12-2
6-0
05B 1
62-2
7-1
00162-27-084 6
12-27 6
-09 162-2
7-0651 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
62-27-0
62-2
7-0
76 N5thLn
62-2
7-0
95 6
12 7
-2 6
-06 12
6-27-04
6 16
2-2
7-0
162-29-085 5thLn N5thDr 162-29-100
50 1
62-2
7-0
90 1
62-2
7 8
-01 162-2
7 -050 1
62-27
-041
62-2
6-0
04B 62 7
-2 6
-08 1
62-27-049 162
-27-0
62-2
7-0
W
8162-27-086
V
62-2
7-0
P
H O
ENIX erm
ontA
ve
62-27-0
57 16
2-2
7-0
N5
thA
ve
162-26-020
62-2
6-0
4 6
312 6
-2 4
-02 1
62-2
7-1
59 162-27-119A 162-27-110D 1
62-2
7-1
162-29-084 162-29-102 162-29-101 16
2-2
9-0
62-2
7-1
21 16
2-2
7-1
14 162-27-109A
00 1
62-2
6-0
33 162-26-021 1
62-2
7-1
12 7
-2 6
-10 1
62-2
7-1
12 162-27-110E 1
62 7
-2 0
-17
12 6
-2 4
-01 1
62 7
-2 2
-13 6
12-2
7-1
16 162 -27-108
62-2
6-0
44 162-26-022
62-2
7-1
61 1
62-2
7-1 162-27-110B
-27-1
20 1
62-2
7-1
162-27-109B
62-2
6-0
31 162-26-023
62-27
-122
1 62 -2 9-1
0 4 1 62-29-105 162-29-007D
62-2
6-0
90 -2
7-1
62-2
7-1
62-2
7-1
11 162-27-110C
62-2
6-0
45 1
62-2
6-0
4 6
0 12 6
-2 3
-04A 6
12 7
-2 2
-15
62-2
7-1
N4th
162-26-024 16
2-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
26 1
62-2
7-0
01 Av
e
62-2
6-0
30 62-2
7-0
20 1
62-2
7-0
12A 162-27-002
62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
46 162-26-025 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
39 1
62-2
7-0
1 6
812-2
7-0
12 6
-2 3
-0 6
6 12 6
-2-0
29 6
12 7
-2 2
-04 162-27-010E
162-26-026 1
62-2
7-0
23 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
47 1
62-2
7-0
22 162-27-005B
62-2
6-0
37 1
62-2
6-0
28 162-26-027 1
62-2
7-0
21 1
62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
38 62-2
7-0
62-2
6-0
,00
0 N3
rdA
ve
62-2
5-0
37 162-25-134
62-2
3-0
31E 1
62-2
3-0
29A 1
62-2
3-0
62 162-23-061A 1
62-2
5-0
62-2
8-1
62-2
3-0
01 162-23-087A 61
62-2
5-0
69 162-25-036A
WCo
lte
rSt WO
N2 n d
re
gonA W
-25-0
ve Ge
org
iaA
ve WMis
sou
ri A
ve
Dr 162-25-146
162-25-057D 162-25-057G 162-25-057F
62-25
-034
WDn
e n
to
162-23-032A 1
62-2
3-0
27 6
12 3
-2 0
-03 162-23-085 6
12-2
3-0
62-2
3-0
59 1
62 5
-2 7
-08 162-25-092
62-2
5-0
68 1
62-25-0
321 62
-25-030
162-25
-031 Ln
-25-0291 6
2-25-02
162-23-033A 12 3
-2-0
26 6
12-2
3-0
04 162-23-084 1
62-2
3 6
-041
62-2
3 5
-08 6
12 5
-2 7
-0 6
912 5
-2-0
62 162-25-142
62-2
5-1
62-25-0
162-25-138
62-25-0
62-2
5-0
74 162-2
5-026 1
62-2
5-129AW 1
62 5
-2 4
-04C
162-23-034A 12 3
-2-0
25 1
62-2
3-0
05 162-23-083 6
12-2
3 6
-051
62-2
3-0
57 6
12-2
5 8
-00 162-25-022A
62-2
5-0
66 1
62-2
5-0
M
edlo
ckP
laceIW
DD
62-2
5-3
162-23-035A
,50
62 3
-2 0
-06 162-23-082 1
62 3
-2 6
-0 6
612-2
3-0
56 1
62-2
5-0
8 6
112 5
-2 7
-01 1
62-2
5-0
2 6
112 5
-2 2
-00 Vic
toriaS
q
62 5
-2 7
-05 6
12 5
-2 1
-0 6
912 5
-2 1
-08
N2
ndA
ve
62-2
3-0
36 1
62-2
3-0
07 162-23-081 1
62-2
3-0
6 6
712-2
3 5
-05 1
62-2
5-0
62-2
5-0
17 162-25-105
62-2
5-0
70 16
2-2
5-0
16 162-28-030
62-2
3-0
3 6
7 12 3
-2 2
-02 1
62-2
3-0
08 162-23-080 1
62-2
3-0
62-2
3-0
54 6
12 5
-2 8
-03A
62-2
5-0
1 6
512-2
5-0
14 N1
stD
r
WMe
dlo
ckD
r
62-2
5-0
WP
asad
enaA
ve
62 3
-2 3
-08 6
12 3
-2 6
-0 6
12 5
-2 1
-0 6
312 5
-2 1
-02
62-2
3-0
09 162-23-079 91
62 3
-2 5
-03 1
62 5
-2 8
-04 WCe
ntra
l
62-2
5-0
62-2
5-0
1 6
112-2
5-0
,00
0 1
62-2
3-0
3 P
62-2
8-0
27A
9 12 3
-2-0
20 1
62 3
-2 1
-00 162-23-078 1
62-2
3-0
62-2
3-0
52 6
12 5
-2 8
-05
ark
62-2
5-0
72 162-25-008A N1
stA
ve
162-25-009A 1
62-2
5-0
Fee
t 1
62-2
3-0
62-2
3-0
19 1
62 3
-2 1
-01 162-23-077 1
62-2
3-0
71 6
12-2
5-0
8 6
612 5
-2 6
-05 16
2-2
5-0
62-2
5-0
162-23-050
162-23-042C
62-2
5-0
62-2
3-0
45A 1
62-2
3-0
73A
62-2
5-0
62-2
8-0
25A
62-2
3-0
46F 1
62 3
-2 1
-05 6
12 3
-2-0
14B 6
12-2
3 1
-02A 6
12-2
3-0
75B 1
62-2
3-0
76A 6
12 3
-2 7
-04A 6
12-2
3-0
49 1
62-2
3-0
48 6
12 5
-2-0
87A
62-2
5-0
63A 1
62-2
5-0
NC
ENT
R A
LAV
E
162-22-118
162-22-117
162-22-116
162-22-115
162-22-114
162-22-113
62-2
0-0
27 162-22-112
162-22-111
162-22-110
162-22-109
162-22-108
162-22-107
162-22-106
162-22-105
162-22-104
162-22-103
162-22-102
162-22-101
62-2
0-0
162-22-100
162-22-099
162-22-098
62-2
0-0
28B 162-22-097
62-2
2-0
40 1
62-2
2-0
62-2
0-0
52A
162-22-076 162-22-119
62-3
6-0
162-20-024A 1
62-2
2-0
39C 162-22-039A 162-22-092 162-22-081 162-22-087 162-22-086
62-20
-047 162-22-120
162-22-075
-20-0
45 162-2
0-022 162-22-093 162-22-080 162-22-088 162-22-085 162-22-121
162-22-074
L
e g
end 62
162-36-002A
-2
P
arce
ls S
tre
ets -0
2-2
0-0
46 1
62 0
-2 2
-00 1
62-2
2 4
-01 162-22-039B 162-22-073 162-22-094 162-22-079 162-22-089 162-22-084 162-22-122
12 0
-2 4
-0 6
312-2
0-0
44 16
2-20 2
-01 162-22-072 162-22-123
EO
162-22-071 162-22-095 162-22-078 162-22-090 162-22-083 162-22-124
2-2
0-0
42 162-20-017A 1
62-2
2-0
ran
geD
r EC
o
6 162-22-008
lte
rS
162-22-125
t
162-22-070
EM EO
re
162-22-096 162-22-077 162-22-091 162-22-082
edlo
c g
o
62-2
0-0
41 16
2-2
0-0
kD
r nA
v EM
is
sou
162-22-069 162-22-126
e riA
ve
2-20
-039
162-36-003B
12 -2
0-016 1
62-2
2-0
2 162-22-068 1
62-2
2-1
62-2
0- 01A
5 162-22-009
-2
2-0
162-20-015A
2-2
0-0
40 t
A
162-22-067 1
stS
t s
N1tS
62-2
0-03
7 162-20-0
D
ate
:2/2
2/2
62-2
2-0
42 162-22-010
162-22-066 NFu
on ir
inC
ta
162-20-036A 162-22-065 162-22-046
62-2
0-0
35 1
62-2
0-0
62-2
0-0
M
edl1
ockP l0
aceIW
DD
62-2
2-0
35B 162-22-064 162-22-047
12 0
-2 3
-0 6
312-2
0-0
34 1
62-2
0-0
0 6
912-2
0-0
10 1
62 2
-2 4
-03 162-22-011 162-22-063 162-22-048
62-3
6-0
$WWDFKPHQW%5HTXHVW/HWWHUDQG0DS6XEPLWWHGE\0HGORFN3ODFH
To:CityofPhoenix
CC:SaltRiverProject
March29,2022
From:RichardMountjoy
RE:RequestforFormationofIrrigationWaterDeliveryDistrict
DearCityofPhoenix,
WeasaneighborhoodMedlockPlace,arerequestingconsenttoformanIrrigationWater
DeliveryDistrict(IWDD)fromtheCityofPhoenix.ThepurposeofanIWDDistocreatean
equitabledistributionofcostsassociatedwiththeuseandmaintenanceoftheprivate
neighborhoodirrigationsystem.ThisisaccomplishedusinganannualMaricopaCounty
propertyassessment.WeareaskingtheCityofPhoenixtopassthisrequestofresolution,
authorizingtheformationofMedlockPlaceIWDD.
EnclosedyouwillfindSaltRiverProject’sapprovalalongwithmapsoftheproposeddistrict,
legaldescription,andthehomeownerlist.Iwillbetherepresentativefortheproposed
IWDD.OncewereceiveapprovalfromtheCityofPhoenix,anImpactStatementtoform
willbesenttotheMaricopaCountyBoardofSupervisorstomovetheprocessforward.We
appreciateyourattentiontothisrequest.Forquestionspleasecontactmeatthenumber
below.
Sincerely,
RichardMountjoy
44W.ColterSt.
Phoenix,AZ85013
rick.mountjoy@gmail.com
602Ͳ955Ͳ5676
Page 429
EXHIBITA
LEGALDESCRIPTION
AllofTHEPALMS,aCondominiumoftheSoutheastQuarteroftheSouthwestQuarter,ofSection17,
Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtotheRecordin
theOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinDocket13852,Page877,
andreͲrecordedinDocket14005,page984;
TOGETHERWITH
TheWest100feetoftheEast318feetofLot1,Block2,ofEVANSADDITIONTOORANGEWOOD,a
SubdivisionofSection17,Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridian
accordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,
RecordedinBook2ofMaps,Page56;
TOGETHERWITH
TheNorth162.5feetofLot4,Block2,ofEVANSADDITIONTOORANGEWOOD,aSubdivisionofSection
17,Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatof
RecordintheOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook2ofMaps,
Page56;
TOGETHERWITH
TheWest120feetoftheEasthalfoftheEasthalfofLot20,Block2,ofEVANSADDITIONTO
ORANGEWOOD,aSubdivisionofSection17,Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiver
BaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopa
County,Arizona,RecordedinBook2ofMaps,Page56;
TOGETHERWITH
Lots1through47,ofMEDLOCKPLACEAMENDED,aSubdivisionofSection17,Township2North,Range
3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeofthe
CountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook16ofMaps,Page6;
TOGETHERWITH
Lots48through57,Lots62through63,Lot65,andLots68through71,ofSOUTHMEDLOCKPLACE,a
SubdivisionofSection17,Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridian
accordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,
RecordedinBook16ofMaps,Page42;
Page 430
TOGETHERWITH
Lots1through6,andLots9through15,ofORANGEWOODESTATES,aSubdivisionofSection17,
Township2North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatof
RecordintheOfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook19ofMaps,
Page47;ExcepttheWest122feetofsaidLot1,andExcepttheWest61feetofsaidLot2,andExcept
theWest130feetofsaidLot6;
TOGETHERWITH
Lot2,andLots4through8,ofBlock1,Lots1through8,ofBlock2,andLots1,2,3,andtheEast18feet
ofLot4,Lot5,andLot7,ofBlock3,ofSOUTHORANGEWOOD,aSubdivisionofSection17,Township2
North,Range3East,oftheGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatofRecordinthe
OfficeoftheCountyRecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook25ofMaps,Page12;
ExcepttheNorth19feetoftheWest27feetofsaidLot4Block1,andExcepttheNorth19feetofthe
East46.5feetofsaidLot6Block1,andExcepttheEast46.5feetofsaidLot5Block1;
TOGETHERWITH
Lots1through30,ofALDRICHPLACE,aSubdivisionofSection17,Township2North,Range3East,of
theGilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeoftheCounty
RecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook26ofMaps,Page9;
TOGETHERWITH
Allof21PASADENA,aHorizontalPropertyRegimeofSection17,Township2North,Range3East,ofthe
GilaandSaltRiverBaseandMeridianaccordingtothePlatofRecordintheOfficeoftheCounty
RecorderofMaricopaCounty,Arizona,RecordedinBook281ofMaps,Page42;
Page 431
Page 432
156‐40‐001T 156‐4 156‐43‐041 156‐43‐007
156‐40‐001P 3‐106 156‐43
‐074 156‐43
‐059 156‐43‐040 156‐43‐025 156‐43‐006
156‐4 156‐4 156‐43
3‐1 05 3‐09 4 ‐07 3 156‐4 156‐43‐026 156‐43‐005
3‐060 156‐43‐039
156‐4 156‐4 156‐4 1
3‐104 3‐095 3‐072 56‐43 156‐43‐0
‐061 156‐43‐0
38 27 156‐43‐004
156‐4 156‐4 156‐43 156‐43
3‐103 3‐096 ‐071 ‐037
156‐40‐001W
156‐43
‐028 156‐43‐003
156‐4 156‐4 3
156‐43‐035 156‐43‐036
3‐10 2 ‐0 9 7 156‐43‐070
156‐43
‐029
156‐43‐002
156‐43‐125A
156‐43‐0 N 8th Ave
156‐43‐069
156‐40‐001N
156‐43‐1
156‐40‐001M
156‐43‐001A
W Colter St W Ore
‐43
156‐40‐001X W Missouri Ave
156‐43‐0 ‐03
156‐43‐100 99 156‐43‐068 156‐43‐033 156‐43‐031 0
gon Av
156‐43‐121 e 156‐43‐122
156‐43‐123 156‐43‐124 156‐43‐066A
156‐43‐034 156‐43‐062
156‐43‐063
156‐43‐032 156‐43‐064
156‐43‐067A 156‐33‐133B
W Georgia Ave
N 7TH AVE
162‐27‐101A 162‐27‐085A 162‐27‐075A 162‐27‐058A 162‐27‐046A 162‐27‐032
162‐27‐077A 162‐27‐052B
162‐27‐097 162‐27‐087 162‐27‐071 162‐27‐044 162‐27‐033
162‐26‐008C 162‐27‐059 162‐29‐001A
162‐27‐103 162‐27‐089 162‐27‐070 162‐27‐060 162‐27‐052C 162‐27‐040 162‐27‐030
162‐27‐080
162‐26‐010A
162‐27‐074 162‐27‐063
0 162‐27‐099 162‐27‐092 162‐27‐047 162‐27‐029
162‐27‐051
162‐27‐096 162‐27‐091 162‐27‐083 162‐27‐073
162‐26‐003
162‐27‐061 162‐27‐055 162‐27‐038 162‐27‐035
162‐26‐008A
162‐26‐010C
162‐26‐008D
162‐27‐088 162‐27‐067
162‐27‐094 162‐27‐078 162‐27‐062 162‐27‐054 162‐27‐045 162‐27‐036
162‐27‐072
162‐26‐088
162‐27‐102 162‐27‐093 162‐27‐056 162‐27‐053 162‐27‐039 162‐27‐034
162‐27‐079
162‐26‐005B 162‐27‐100 162‐27‐084 162‐27‐069 162‐27‐065 162‐27‐048 162‐27‐042 162‐27‐031
162‐27‐076 N 5th Ln
250 162‐27‐095
162‐29‐085 5th Ln
162‐27‐064 162‐27‐037
N5thDr 162‐29‐100
162‐27‐066
162‐27‐090 162‐27‐081 162‐27‐050 162‐27‐041
162‐26‐004B
PHOENIX
162‐27‐049 162‐27‐043
W Vermont Ave
162‐27‐098 162‐27‐086 162‐27‐082 162‐27‐068
162‐27‐057 162‐27‐028
N 5th Ave
162‐26‐020
162‐27‐119A
162‐29‐057
162‐27‐159 162‐27‐110D 162‐27‐106
162‐29‐084 162‐29‐102 162‐29‐101
162‐26‐043 162‐26‐042
500 162‐27‐121 162‐27‐114 162‐27‐109A
162‐26‐033 162‐26‐021 162‐27‐118
162‐27‐160 162‐27‐112 162‐27‐110E 162‐27‐107
162‐26‐041 162‐27‐123 162‐27‐116 162‐27‐108
162‐26‐044 162‐26‐022
162‐27‐161 162‐27‐113 162‐27‐110B
162‐27‐120 162‐27‐117
162‐26‐090
162‐27‐109B
162‐29‐104 162‐29‐105 162‐29‐007D
162‐27‐104
162‐26‐031 162‐26‐023 162‐27‐122
162‐27‐110C
162‐26‐045 162‐27‐115 162‐27‐111 162‐27‐105
162‐26‐040 162‐26‐034A 162‐27‐125 N 4th
162‐26‐024 162‐27‐019
162‐26‐030 162‐27‐026 162‐27‐020
162‐27‐001 Ave
162‐27‐027 162‐27‐012A 162‐27‐002
162‐26‐046 162‐26‐025 162‐27‐025
162‐26‐039 162‐27‐018 162‐27‐017
162‐26‐036 162‐26‐029 162‐27‐024 162‐27‐010E
162‐26‐026 162‐27‐023 162‐27‐016 162‐27‐015
162‐26‐047 162‐27‐022 162‐27‐005B
162‐26‐037
162‐26‐089
162‐26‐038 162‐26‐028 162‐26‐027 162‐27‐021 162‐27‐014 162‐27‐013
1,000
N 3rd Ave
162‐25‐037 162‐25‐134
162‐28‐140
162‐23‐031E 162‐23‐029A 162‐23‐062 162‐23‐061A
W Colter St
162‐23‐001 162‐23‐087A 162‐25‐076 162‐25‐069 162‐25‐036A
N 2nd
W Oregon Ave W Georgia Ave W Missouri Ave
162‐25‐035 162‐25‐057D 162‐25‐057G 162‐25‐057F
W Denton Dr 162‐25‐146
162‐25‐034
162‐23‐032A 162‐23‐027 162‐23‐003 162‐23‐085 162‐23‐063 162‐23‐059 162‐25‐078 162‐25‐092
162‐25‐068 162‐25‐032 162‐25‐030
162‐25‐031
Ln
162‐23‐033A 162‐25‐029 162‐25‐027
162‐25‐149
162‐23‐026 162‐23‐004 162‐23‐084 162‐23‐064 162‐23‐058 162‐25‐079 162‐25‐062
162‐25‐138
162‐25‐142
162‐25‐028
162‐25‐025
162‐25‐074 162‐25‐026 162‐25‐044C
162‐25‐129A W
162‐23‐034A
Medlock Place IWDD
162‐23‐025 162‐23‐005 162‐23‐083 162‐23‐065 162‐23‐057 162‐25‐080 162‐25‐022A
1,500 162‐25‐066 162‐25‐023
162‐25‐371
162‐23‐035A 162‐23‐006 162‐23‐082 162‐23‐066 162‐23‐056 162‐25‐081 162‐25‐071 162‐25‐021 162‐25‐020
Victoria Sq
162‐25‐075 162‐25‐019 162‐25‐018
N 2nd Ave
162‐23‐036 162‐23‐007 162‐23‐081 162‐23‐067 162‐23‐055 162‐25‐082
162‐25‐017 162‐25‐105
162‐25‐070 162‐25‐016 162‐28‐030
162‐23‐037 162‐23‐022 162‐23‐008 162‐23‐080 162‐23‐068 162‐23‐054 162‐25‐083A
162‐25‐015 162‐25‐014 N 1st Dr
W Medlock Dr
162‐25‐067
W Pasadena Ave
162‐23‐038 162‐25‐013 162‐25‐012
162‐23‐009 162‐23‐079 162‐23‐069 162‐23‐053 162‐25‐084 W Central
162‐25‐064
162‐25‐011 162‐25‐010
162‐28‐027A
2,000 Park
162‐23‐039 162‐23‐020 162‐23‐010 162‐23‐078 162‐23‐070 162‐23‐052 162‐25‐085
162‐25‐072 162‐25‐008A N 1st Ave
Feet 162‐25‐009A 162‐25‐042
162‐23‐019 162‐23‐011 162‐23‐077 162‐23‐071 162‐23‐051 162‐25‐086 162‐25‐065 162‐25‐005
162‐23‐050
162‐23‐042C 162‐25‐004
162‐25‐003
162‐23‐045A 162‐23‐073A
162‐28‐025A
162‐23‐046F 162‐23‐015 162‐23‐014B 162‐23‐012A 162‐23‐075B 162‐23‐076A 162‐23‐074A 162‐23‐049 162‐23‐048 162‐25‐087A 162‐25‐063A 162‐25‐002 162‐25‐001
N CENTRAL AVE
162‐22‐118
162‐22‐117
162‐22‐116
162‐22‐115
162‐22‐114
162‐22‐113
162‐20‐027 162‐22‐112
162‐22‐111
162‐22‐110
162‐22‐109
162‐22‐108
162‐22‐107
162‐22‐106
162‐22‐105
162‐22‐104
162‐22‐103
162‐22‐102
162‐22‐101
162‐20‐051
162‐22‐100
162‐22‐099
162‐22‐098
162‐20‐028B 162‐22‐097
162‐22‐040 162‐22‐038
162‐20‐052A
162‐36‐001
162‐22‐076 162‐22‐092 162‐22‐081 162‐22‐087 162‐22‐086 162‐22‐119
162‐20‐047 162‐20‐024A 162‐22‐039C 162‐22‐039A
Legend
Parcels Streets 162‐22‐075 162‐22‐120
162‐20‐045 162‐22‐093 162‐22‐080 162‐22‐088 162‐22‐085
162‐22‐037
162‐20‐022 162‐22‐074 162‐22‐121 162‐36‐002A
162‐20‐046 162‐20‐020 162‐22‐041 162‐22‐039B 162‐22‐073 162‐22‐094 162‐22‐079 162‐22‐089 162‐22‐084 162‐22‐122
162‐20‐043 162‐20‐044 162‐20‐021 162‐22‐072 162‐22‐123
162‐22‐095 162‐22‐078 162‐22‐090 162‐22‐083
162‐22‐071 162‐22‐124
E Orange Dr E Colter St
162‐20‐042 162‐20‐017A 162‐22‐026 162‐22‐008
162‐22‐070 162‐22‐096 162‐22‐077 162‐22‐091 162‐22‐082 162‐22‐125
E Medlock Dr E Oregon Ave
162‐20‐041 162‐20‐018
E Missouri Ave
162‐22‐069 162‐22‐126 162‐36‐003B
162‐20‐001A
162‐20‐039 162‐20‐016 162‐22‐068
162‐22‐035A
162‐20‐015A
162‐22‐025 162‐22‐009 162‐22‐127
162‐20‐040
Date: 2/22/2022
162‐22‐067 1st St N 1st St
162‐20‐037 162‐20‐014 162‐22‐066
162‐22‐042 162‐22‐010 N Fountain Cir
Medlock Place IWDD
162‐20‐036A 162‐22‐065 162‐22‐046
162‐20‐035 162‐20‐011 162‐20‐012
162‐22‐035B 162‐22‐064 162‐22‐047
162‐22‐043 162‐22‐011
162‐36‐017
162‐20‐033 162‐20‐034 162‐20‐009 162‐20‐010 162‐22‐063 162‐22‐048
PROPOSEDMEDLOCKPLACEIWDDOWNERSHIPREPORT
2/22/2022
Total Net
Total Total Assessed Assessed
Improvement Assessed Net Value Value Total Average
Count ParcelNo TaxYear OwnerName InCareOf MailingAddress CityStateZip SitusAddress SitusCityZip LandFCV FCV TotalFCV FCV FCV TotalLPV (LPV) (LPV) Acreage LotSize
VALLARINOROBERTA/SARAH
1 162Ͳ27Ͳ023 2022 2012VALLARINOFAMILYTRUST CTR 307WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 307WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $90,300 $361,200 $451,500 $22,575 $22,575 $238,155 $11,908 $11,908 0.225
2 162Ͳ23Ͳ106 2022 21WPASADENALLC 1101WOCOTILLORD PHOENIXAZ85013 21WPASADENAAVE,3 PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.030
3 162Ͳ23Ͳ085 2022 360MAMMOTHLLC 9874ORANGELN ESCONDIDOCA92029 39WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $239,900 $959,700 $1,199,600 $119,960 $119,960 $478,252 $47,825 $47,825 0.446
4 162Ͳ25Ͳ079 2022 38WCOLTERLLC 38WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 38WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $67,500 $270,300 $337,800 $16,890 $16,890 $216,448 $10,822 $10,822 0.340
5 162Ͳ23Ͳ075B 2022 5102NORTHCENTRALLLC 5102NCENTRALAVE PHOENIXAZ85012 5102NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $219,200 $217,700 $436,900 $76,458 $76,458 $231,813 $40,567 $40,567 0.160
CHOIHYUNGS/ABEALYSSON
6 162Ͳ27Ͳ110D 2022 ABECHOITRUST HTR 346WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 346WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $97,300 $389,400 $486,700 $48,670 $48,670 $372,318 $37,232 $37,232 0.228
7 162Ͳ23Ͳ080 2022 ALGARSIMONR/CHEVASSUTSARAHF 21WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 21WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $102,500 $410,100 $512,600 $51,260 $51,260 $343,805 $34,381 $34,381 0.446
8 162Ͳ27Ͳ052B 2022 ALLENMARIES 645WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 645WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $89,700 $358,900 $448,600 $22,430 $22,430 $260,188 $13,009 $13,009 0.394
8 162Ͳ27Ͳ052C 2022 ALLENMARIES 645WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 $236,600 $0 $236,600 $35,490 $35,490 $130,130 $19,520 $19,520 0.186
9 162Ͳ23Ͳ083 2022 ALLISONCLAUDEFIII/KAYL 33WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 33WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $106,000 $424,300 $530,300 $26,515 $26,515 $350,557 $17,528 $17,528 0.446
10 162Ͳ27Ͳ079 2022 ANDREWANDANNABRAHAMTRUST 520WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 520WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $97,900 $391,800 $489,700 $24,485 $24,485 $296,031 $14,802 $14,802 0.229
11 162Ͳ27Ͳ058A 2022 AZADVANCEINVESTINGLLC 5501N7THAVESTE103 PHOENIXAZ85013 698WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $56,000 $224,000 $280,000 $28,000 $28,000 $173,011 $17,301 $17,301 0.162
12 162Ͳ23Ͳ004 2022 BALTUSCORPORATION 201ESOUTHERNAVENO159 APACHEJUNCTIONAZ85119 36WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $130,600 $522,500 $653,100 $65,310 $65,310 $219,846 $21,985 $21,985 0.455
13 162Ͳ27Ͳ063 2022 BAMBRIDGEJACQUELINEMARIE 532WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 532WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $75,000 $300,200 $375,200 $22,887 $22,887 $226,052 $13,789 $13,789 0.183
14 162Ͳ25Ͳ064 2022 BARKERͲDETWILERJUSTINR/THOMASA 31WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 31WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $107,300 $429,200 $536,500 $26,825 $26,825 $319,785 $15,989 $15,989 0.346
15 162Ͳ27Ͳ067 2022 BEARDENMELANIE 523WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 523WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $51,100 $204,400 $255,500 $25,550 $25,550 $158,397 $15,840 $15,840 0.185
16 162Ͳ27Ͳ028 2022 BENDELMARION 540WWILSHIREDR PHOENIXAZ85003 505WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $54,500 $218,200 $272,700 $27,270 $27,270 $170,001 $17,000 $17,000 0.197
17 162Ͳ25Ͳ025 2022 BILBREYBRUCEE/ELLENL 215WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 215WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $71,700 $286,800 $358,500 $17,925 $17,925 $197,261 $9,863 $9,863 0.243
18 162Ͳ23Ͳ090 2022 BILOTASEVE 920EMITCHELLDRUNIT101 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,3 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
19 162Ͳ27Ͳ112 2022 BINDERANDREA/HAROLDM 55SHELBYDRNOB3 SEDONAAZ86336 407WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $52,800 $211,200 $264,000 $26,400 $26,400 $166,651 $16,665 $16,665 0.188
20 162Ͳ25Ͳ013 2022 BISHROGERL 34WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 34WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $81,500 $326,300 $407,800 $40,780 $40,780 $271,112 $27,111 $27,111 0.237
21 162Ͳ25Ͳ015 2022 BRENTONSHAUNG/HARRYSJRTR 44WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 44WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,200 $316,800 $396,000 $39,600 $39,600 $263,135 $26,314 $26,314 0.233
BRIANALEXANDERWORRALLANDREBECCAJEANES
22 162Ͳ23Ͳ022 2022 WORRALLTRUST 23WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ850132001 23WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $125,900 $503,700 $629,600 $31,480 $31,480 $530,703 $26,535 $26,535 0.465
23 162Ͳ23Ͳ095
Page 433 2022 BROOKSBENTLEYY/MONICABTR 1515BOLERODR CARSONCITYNV89703 31WPASADENAAVE,8 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
24 162Ͳ23Ͳ056 2022 BROWNKYLES/AMYE 19WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 19WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $153,500 $614,000 $767,500 $38,375 $38,375 $458,455 $22,923 $22,923 0.437
25 162Ͳ23Ͳ008 2022 BROWNLISAALLISONTR 24WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 24WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $115,200 $461,100 $576,300 $57,630 $57,630 $441,747 $44,175 $44,175 0.455
26 162Ͳ27Ͳ001 2022 BROWNTHOMASJ 335WMISSOURI PHOENIXAZ85013 335WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $94,100 $376,600 $470,700 $47,070 $47,070 $336,861 $33,686 $33,686 0.478
27 162Ͳ27Ͳ119 2022 BRYCKDREWMICHAELGARY 498WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 498WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $80,200 $321,000 $401,200 $40,120 $40,120 $287,108 $28,711 $28,711 0.184
28 162Ͳ23Ͳ054 2022 BURGHARTWILLIAMT/KATHRYNM 15WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 15WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $122,900 $491,700 $614,600 $30,730 $30,730 $355,407 $17,770 $17,770 0.437
DANGCHRISTOPHERT/BUSHU
29 162Ͳ27Ͳ043 2022 BUSHUͲDANGFAMILYTRUST BREANNELTR 502WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 502WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $60,200 $241,000 $301,200 $15,060 $15,060 $188,669 $9,433 $9,433 0.199
30 162Ͳ23Ͳ063 2022 CAMERONSHERRYJ/HARRELL 300WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 40WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $94,800 $379,300 $474,100 $23,705 $23,705 $285,234 $14,262 $14,262 0.432
31 162Ͳ25Ͳ074 2022 CASTANROBERTA/LEHMANNCALEBP 117WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 117WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $74,200 $297,100 $371,300 $37,130 $37,130 $233,143 $23,314 $23,314 0.221
BURGGRAFCHADK/JENNIFER
32 162Ͳ25Ͳ014 2022 CB&JREVOCABLETRUST MARIALARSONTR 45WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 45WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $102,400 $409,900 $512,300 $51,230 $51,230 $348,364 $34,836 $34,836 0.238
33 162Ͳ25Ͳ071 2022 CEIMOCHRISTOPHERJ 73WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 73WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $56,600 $226,600 $283,200 $14,160 $14,160 $184,387 $9,219 $9,219 0.232
34 162Ͳ25Ͳ081 2022 CHAPMANEILYNNJ 20WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 20WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $88,000 $352,100 $440,100 $22,005 $22,005 $284,116 $14,206 $14,206 0.344
35 162Ͳ23Ͳ009 2022 CHIMENEͲWEISSSARAALIZA 20WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 20WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $95,900 $383,700 $479,600 $23,980 $23,980 $348,089 $17,404 $17,404 0.455
MARIACHOPKO/ANNAMARIA
36 162Ͳ25Ͳ027 2022 CHOPKOTRUST LYLYKTR 217WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 217WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $36,800 $286,500 $323,300 $16,165 $11,977 $183,295 $9,165 $4,977 0.122
MARIACHOPKO/ANNAMARIA
36 162Ͳ25Ͳ031 2022 CHOPKOTRUST LYLYKTR 217WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 217WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $34,800 $0 $34,800 $1,740 $1,740 $19,059 $953 $953 0.115
37 162Ͳ23Ͳ065 2022 CIESZKOWSKIKEVINJ/NIGHSWONGERCHANTELLM 34WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 34WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $106,000 $424,200 $530,200 $26,510 $26,510 $391,822 $19,591 $19,591 0.432
38 162Ͳ27Ͳ038 2022 CIESZKOWSKIKEVINJANUSZ 2819BAKERSTUNIT1 SANFRANCISCOCA94123 522WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $57,200 $229,100 $286,300 $14,315 $14,315 $176,259 $8,813 $8,813 0.186
39 162Ͳ23Ͳ049 2022 CIRCLEROADCAPITALLLC 5134NCENTRALAVESTE200 PHOENIXAZ85012 5134NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $318,900 $248,800 $567,700 $99,348 $99,348 $517,734 $90,603 $90,603 0.297
39 162Ͳ23Ͳ050 2022 CIRCLEROADCAPITALLLC 5134NCENTRALAVESTE200 PHOENIXAZ85012 3WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $73,900 $0 $73,900 $12,933 $12,933 $30,945 $5,415 $5,415 0.069
39 162Ͳ23Ͳ051 2022 CIRCLEROADCAPITALLLC 5134NCENTRALAVESTE200 PHOENIXAZ85012 7WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $370,200 $152,700 $522,900 $91,508 $91,508 $249,008 $43,576 $43,576 0.345
40 162Ͳ27Ͳ110C 2022 CLARKRONALDC/PHILOMENAJTR 328WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 328WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $85,000 $340,000 $425,000 $42,500 $42,500 $318,539 $31,854 $31,854 0.214
41 162Ͳ27Ͳ029 2022 COBBLINDAL 533WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 533WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $55,300 $221,400 $276,700 $13,835 $13,835 $175,227 $8,761 $8,761 0.185
42 162Ͳ23Ͳ094 2022 CONKLINJOHNG 6170WEVANSDR GLENDALEAZ85306 31WPASADENAAVE,7 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.020
Page1of5
PROPOSEDMEDLOCKPLACEIWDDOWNERSHIPREPORT
2/22/2022
43 162Ͳ23Ͳ100 2022 CONNEELYMICHAEL 31WPASADENAAVEUNIT13 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,13 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.020
44 162Ͳ27Ͳ060 2022 COOLEDGEJEFFREYW 536WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 536WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,300 $249,200 $311,500 $31,150 $31,150 $203,446 $20,345 $20,345 0.190
45 162Ͳ27Ͳ054 2022 COOPEREARLAANITA 523WVERMONTST PHOENIXAZ85013 523WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $61,800 $247,400 $309,200 $15,460 $15,460 $205,661 $10,283 $10,283 0.189
46 162Ͳ23Ͳ103 2022 COPELANDCIARA 31WPASADENAAVEUNIT16 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,16 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.018
47 162Ͳ27Ͳ059 2022 COULTERPATRICIAJ 540WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 540WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $54,300 $217,400 $271,700 $13,585 $13,585 $171,829 $8,591 $8,591 0.188
48 162Ͳ25Ͳ084 2022 DAVIDONALAN/PAULA 14WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 14WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $103,700 $414,800 $518,500 $25,925 $25,925 $408,221 $20,411 $20,411 0.347
49 162Ͳ23Ͳ052 2022 DESAINTͲANTOINEMARTHATR 11WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 11WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $105,700 $423,000 $528,700 $26,435 $26,435 $379,706 $18,985 $18,985 0.428
50 162Ͳ27Ͳ069 2022 DEGRAWANNEM 519WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 519WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $69,500 $278,200 $347,700 $17,385 $17,385 $229,448 $11,472 $11,472 0.191
DEGRAWRICHARD/REGINAA
51 162Ͳ25Ͳ022A 2022 DEGRAWFAMILYTRUST TR 127WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 127WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $104,500 $418,100 $522,600 $26,130 $26,130 $287,881 $14,394 $14,394 0.358
52 162Ͳ27Ͳ113 2022 DIANAKATHLEENKILBERLIVINGTRUST 335WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 335WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $101,100 $404,500 $505,600 $40,701 $40,701 $168,429 $13,643 $13,643 0.318
JAMESBDONALDSONII
53 162Ͳ25Ͳ075 2022 DIANEANDJBDONALDSONFAMILYTRUST TRUSTEE 50WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 53WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,600 $290,400 $363,000 $36,300 $36,300 $248,396 $24,840 $24,840 0.218
54 162Ͳ27Ͳ012A 2022 DILLEYEVERETTRUSSELL/BRYANTJULIETR 318WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 318WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $116,800 $467,200 $584,000 $29,200 $29,200 $176,705 $8,835 $8,835 0.629
55 162Ͳ23Ͳ087A 2022 DIMATTEOKYLE 45WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 45WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $140,900 $563,800 $704,700 $70,470 $70,470 $553,869 $55,387 $55,387 0.445
56 162Ͳ27Ͳ005B 2022 DINESWILLIAMRV/LEAHC 5302N3RDAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 5302N3RDAVE, PHOENIX85013 $139,300 $557,400 $696,700 $34,835 $34,835 $596,300 $29,815 $29,815 0.364
57 162Ͳ25Ͳ019 2022 DONALDSONJAMESBIITR 50WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 104WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,200 $316,800 $396,000 $39,600 $39,600 $259,441 $25,944 $25,944 0.235
58 162Ͳ25Ͳ017 2022 DONALDSONJAMESBRUCE/DIANEBOAN 50WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 50WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $76,900 $307,900 $384,800 $38,480 $38,480 $260,535 $26,054 $26,054 0.237
59 162Ͳ25Ͳ020 2022 DUNNIGANDIANALOURINE 121WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 121WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $89,400 $357,900 $447,300 $44,730 $44,730 $293,769 $29,377 $29,377 0.241
60 162Ͳ27Ͳ036 2022 EDMONSONKELLYSHEA/DEBRAREAY 523WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 523WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $65,600 $262,500 $328,100 $32,810 $32,810 $233,370 $23,337 $23,337 0.188
61 162Ͳ27Ͳ031 2022 EDWARDSFINANCIALLLC 512WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 513WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $58,700 $235,000 $293,700 $29,370 $29,370 $186,177 $18,618 $18,618 0.182
62 162Ͳ27Ͳ042 2022 EDWARDSTRUST EDWARDSJUDITHANNTR 512WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 512WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $60,900 $243,900 $304,800 $30,480 $30,480 $204,627 $20,463 $20,463 0.186
63 162Ͳ23Ͳ019 2022 EVELANDPROPERTIESINC 15WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 11WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $345,700 $330,800 $676,500 $67,650 $67,650 $459,636 $45,964 $45,964 0.458
63 162Ͳ23Ͳ020 2022 EVELANDPROPERTIESINC 15WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 15WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $348,800 $352,400 $701,200 $70,120 $70,120 $469,240 $46,924 $46,924 0.462
64 162Ͳ27Ͳ071 2022 FITZͲSIMMONSDONALDL POBOX34803 PHOENIXAZ85067 543WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $58,800 $235,400 $294,200 $29,420 $29,420 $201,969 $20,197 $20,197 0.190
65 162Ͳ27Ͳ047 2022 FLADINGKELLYR 528WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 528WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $77,100 $308,600 $385,700 $19,285 $19,285 $222,829 $11,141 $11,141 0.185
BENNETTFREDERICK
66 162Ͳ27Ͳ074 2022 FNBTRUST LEWERS/NANCYJANECOͲTR 533WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 533WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,400 $249,600 $312,000 $15,600 $15,600 $209,504 $10,475 $10,475 0.187
67 162Ͳ23Ͳ003
Page 434 2022 FRAZELLEMELISSALEIGH/KINGPAULERDMAN 38WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 38WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $111,700 $447,100 $558,800 $27,940 $27,940 $365,691 $18,285 $18,285 0.455
68 162Ͳ23Ͳ001 2022 GALVARINSUSANJ/DAVIDA 42WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 42WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $100,400 $457,800 $558,200 $27,910 $27,910 $319,279 $15,964 $15,964 0.393
68 162Ͳ23Ͳ002 2022 GALVARINSUSANJ/DAVIDA 42WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 42WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $13,900 $0 $13,900 $1,390 $1,390 $7,535 $754 $754 0.055
69 162Ͳ27Ͳ073 2022 GANNONMICHAELEDWARD/BRENDARUDE 527WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 527WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $74,100 $296,600 $370,700 $18,535 $18,535 $195,301 $9,765 $9,765 0.190
NORTHERNARIZONA
70 162Ͳ25Ͳ030 2022 GEORGIAAVENUETRUST FIDUCIARIESINCTR 101EGURLEYSTSUITE211 PRESCOTTAZ86301 225WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $77,400 $309,900 $387,300 $38,730 $38,730 $231,519 $23,152 $23,152 0.264
71 162Ͳ23Ͳ064 2022 GOLISCHTARAF/HOFFMANDAREKL 38WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 38WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $176,000 $704,300 $880,300 $44,015 $44,015 $510,592 $25,530 $25,530 0.432
72 162Ͳ23Ͳ107 2022 GORDONTHOMPSONTRUST 21WPASADENAAVEUNIT4 PHOENIXAZ85013 21WPASADENAAVE,4 PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.029
73 162Ͳ23Ͳ089 2022 GRACELIGHTPROPERTIESLLC 214EMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85012 31WPASADENAAVE,2 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
74 162Ͳ25Ͳ009A 2022 GRANTSCOOPERANDRACHELLCOOPERLIVINGTRUST 22WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 22WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $84,300 $337,500 $421,800 $42,180 $42,180 $286,824 $28,682 $28,682 0.267
GREGORYRSMITHANDJENNIFERAROBERTSON
75 162Ͳ27Ͳ045 2022 REVOCABLETRUST 520WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 520WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $71,600 $286,500 $358,100 $35,810 $35,810 $223,351 $22,335 $22,335 0.188
76 162Ͳ23Ͳ098 2022 GROUNDTIFFANYH 31WPASADENAAVE#11 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,11 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
77 162Ͳ25Ͳ012 2022 GUALTIERESAMUEL/PAULA 33WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 33WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $83,200 $333,100 $416,300 $41,630 $41,630 $258,324 $25,832 $25,832 0.240
78 162Ͳ27Ͳ037 2022 HAFFNERERIC 301WPASADENAAVEUNIT9 PHOENIXAZ850132343 509WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,700 $291,100 $363,800 $36,380 $36,380 $250,429 $25,043 $25,043 0.184
79 162Ͳ25Ͳ062 2022 HAGLUNDJOELW&NORMAL 125WOREGON PHOENIXAZ85013 125WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $87,300 $349,500 $436,800 $43,680 $43,680 $304,357 $30,436 $30,436 0.226
80 162Ͳ25Ͳ065 2022 HALLROBERTAS/RUNYONJONATHANBTR 5WOREGON PHOENIXAZ85013 5WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $76,200 $304,900 $381,100 $19,055 $19,055 $252,427 $12,621 $12,621 0.225
81 162Ͳ27Ͳ122 2022 HAMPSONDALEHTR/JUDITHA 1929N18THRD STREATORIL61364 329WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $51,800 $207,500 $259,300 $25,930 $25,930 $159,863 $15,986 $15,986 0.189
82 162Ͳ23Ͳ048 2022 HARRISͲSHCOLNIKPROPERTIESLLC POBOX36842 PHOENIXAZ85067 5144NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $409,900 $199,800 $609,700 $106,698 $106,698 $415,608 $72,731 $72,731 0.297
83 162Ͳ27Ͳ049 2022 HARTERDOUGLASJ 120WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 501WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $70,700 $283,100 $353,800 $17,690 $17,690 $239,349 $11,967 $11,967 0.196
84 162Ͳ25Ͳ023 2022 HARTERJEANNEH 114WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 114WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $71,100 $284,600 $355,700 $17,785 $17,785 $231,962 $11,598 $11,598 0.236
85 162Ͳ25Ͳ072 2022 HAWKINSHREX/REBECCAJTR 21WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85012 21WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $63,900 $255,800 $319,700 $15,985 $15,985 $165,978 $8,299 $8,299 0.236
86 162Ͳ27Ͳ055 2022 HAYDENSHARONLEETR 525WVERMONT PHOENIXAZ85013 525WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,800 $291,400 $364,200 $36,420 $36,420 $246,292 $24,629 $24,629 0.188
87 162Ͳ27Ͳ040 2022 HENRYSUSAN 536WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 536WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $61,700 $246,900 $308,600 $30,860 $30,860 $207,731 $20,773 $20,773 0.191
88 162Ͳ25Ͳ042 2022 HERNANDEZALICIA 13WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 13WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $118,900 $475,900 $594,800 $59,480 $59,480 $408,516 $40,852 $40,852 0.763
88 162Ͳ27Ͳ039 2022 HERNANDEZALICIA 516WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 516WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $64,800 $259,500 $324,300 $32,430 $32,430 $216,595 $21,660 $21,660 0.186
Page2of5
PROPOSEDMEDLOCKPLACEIWDDOWNERSHIPREPORT
2/22/2022
89 162Ͳ27Ͳ117 2022 HINDSDONALDTRENT 334WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 334WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $80,600 $322,700 $403,300 $40,330 $40,330 $275,694 $27,569 $27,569 0.184
90 162Ͳ27Ͳ021 2022 HOIDALTHOMASM 301WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 301WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $83,100 $332,400 $415,500 $20,775 $20,775 $246,065 $12,303 $12,303 0.226
91 162Ͳ23Ͳ061A 2022 JACKSONBILLD/JUANITAG 41WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 41WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $107,100 $428,400 $535,500 $26,775 $26,775 $432,305 $21,615 $21,615 0.440
92 162Ͳ23Ͳ099 2022 JAMESNUBIA 31WPASADENAAVENO12 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,12 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $87,909 $8,791 $8,791 0.019
93 162Ͳ25Ͳ067 2022 JANSONROBERTL/JODEEB 41WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 41WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $113,300 $453,500 $566,800 $56,680 $56,680 $346,907 $34,691 $34,691 0.346
JARAMILLOERNESTGERALD
94 162Ͳ23Ͳ029A 2022 JARAMILLOLIVINGTRUST III/SARALETICIATR 43WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 43WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $101,800 $407,300 $509,100 $25,455 $25,455 $377,934 $18,897 $18,897 0.463
95 162Ͳ23Ͳ104 2022 JEFFERSONJOSHUA 21WPASADENAAVEUNIT1 PHOENIXAZ85013 21WPASADENAAVE,1 PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.030
96 162Ͳ27Ͳ065 2022 JIMENEZFAMILYTRUST JIMENEZTERESAETR 510WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 510WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,700 $266,900 $333,600 $16,680 $16,680 $156,508 $7,825 $7,825 0.185
97 162Ͳ25Ͳ029 2022 JLKTRUST KOHRSJOHNP/LEIGHATR 220WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 220WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $39,300 $0 $39,300 $1,965 $1,965 $20,981 $1,049 $1,049 0.144
97 162Ͳ25Ͳ032 2022 JLKTRUST KOHRSJOHNP/LEIGHATR 220WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 128WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $61,000 $527,900 $588,900 $29,445 $29,445 $354,314 $17,716 $17,716 0.223
97 162Ͳ25Ͳ034 2022 JLKTRUST KOHRSJOHNP/LEIGHATR 220WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 134WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $31,600 $0 $31,600 $1,580 $1,580 $16,844 $842 $842 0.115
98 162Ͳ27Ͳ081 2022 JONLEESCHMITZTRUST 504WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 504WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $78,500 $314,100 $392,600 $19,630 $19,630 $237,531 $11,877 $11,877 0.157
99 162Ͳ23Ͳ093 2022 JONATHANAHILTONFAMILYLIVINGTRUST 1943WMARSHALLAVE PHOENIXAZ85015 31WPASADENAAVE,6 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.018
100 162Ͳ27Ͳ014 2022 JONATHANDKETCHAMLIVINGTRUST 300WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 300WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $110,700 $443,100 $553,800 $55,380 $55,380 $423,734 $42,373 $42,373 0.222
101 162Ͳ23Ͳ097 2022 JONESMALLORY 31WPASADENAAVENO10 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,10 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.020
102 162Ͳ23Ͳ108 2022 JORGENSENJILLIAN 21WPASADENAAVE5 PHOENIXAZ85013 21WPASADENAAVE,5 PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.031
103 162Ͳ23Ͳ074A 2022 KEYSOUTHLIMITEDLIABILITYCOMPANY POBOX69 MANHATTANKS66505 5110NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $405,600 $833,200 $1,238,800 $216,790 $216,790 $908,182 $158,932 $158,932 0.293
103 162Ͳ23Ͳ006 2022 KEYSOUTHLLC 1010WESTLOOPPL MANHATTANKS66502 30WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $116,300 $465,500 $581,800 $58,180 $58,180 $384,304 $38,430 $38,430 0.455
104 162Ͳ25Ͳ069 2022 KHANNADIA/SABEEN/AYAZ 143WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 143WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $82,400 $329,900 $412,300 $41,230 $41,230 $281,420 $28,142 $28,142 0.356
105 162Ͳ27Ͳ025 2022 KOHRSLELANDG/MARIEPTR 311WOREGON PHOENIXAZ85013 311WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $74,900 $299,700 $374,600 $37,460 $37,460 $254,566 $25,457 $25,457 0.232
106 162Ͳ23Ͳ088 2022 KOPECKYVICTORIAANNE 31WPASADENAAVEUNIT1 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,1 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
KROHNBRADLEY
107 162Ͳ27Ͳ120 2022 KROHNFAMILYTRUST A/CATHERINELCOͲTR 4920E.CROCUSDR. SCOTTSDALEAZ85254 333WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,600 $250,400 $313,000 $31,300 $31,300 $204,184 $20,418 $20,418 0.190
108 162Ͳ23Ͳ055 2022 KRUCKENBERGBRIAN/GINA 17WCOLTERSTREET PHOENIXAZ85013 17WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $114,500 $458,300 $572,800 $28,640 $28,640 $291,367 $14,568 $14,568 0.429
109 162Ͳ25Ͳ010 2022 LADOWAMY/ROBERTSAARON 121WORCHIDLN PHOENIXAZ850214538 27WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,100 $264,700 $330,800 $33,080 $33,080 $213,788 $21,379 $21,379 0.241
110 162Ͳ27Ͳ010E 2022 LANGEEDWARDKENNY 310WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 310WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $65,800 $263,500 $329,300 $16,465 $16,465 $197,436 $9,872 $9,872 0.205
111 162Ͳ23Ͳ073A 2022 LATIGOINVESTMENTSLLC 14301N87THSTSUITE119 SCOTTSDALEAZ85260 5120NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $731,900 $921,000 $1,652,900 $289,258 $289,258 $1,211,739 $212,054 $212,054 0.594
112 162Ͳ27Ͳ080
Page 435 2022 LINDREALESTATEHOLDINGSLLC 317WLAWRENCERD PHOENIXAZ85013 538WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $313,800 $0 $313,800 $54,915 $54,915 $149,789 $26,213 $26,213 0.257
LINDNERWILLIAMR/JOAN
113 162Ͳ27Ͳ026 2022 LINDNERTRUST ELLENTR 321WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 321WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $95,400 $381,900 $477,300 $47,730 $47,730 $400,391 $40,039 $40,039 0.235
114 162Ͳ27Ͳ123 2022 LISAPPIERSONTRUST 337WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 337WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $61,600 $246,700 $308,300 $15,415 $15,415 $200,195 $10,010 $10,010 0.185
115 162Ͳ23Ͳ071 2022 LONGMIRELINDAS 14WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85012 14WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $77,200 $308,800 $386,000 $19,300 $19,300 $262,545 $13,127 $13,127 0.432
116 162Ͳ27Ͳ016 2022 LOOPERDIANE 304WOREGON PHOENIXAZ85013 304WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,500 $318,000 $397,500 $19,875 $19,875 $279,682 $13,984 $13,984 0.220
117 162Ͳ27Ͳ044 2022 LOPEZISAACA 648WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 648WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $56,600 $226,400 $283,000 $14,150 $14,150 $180,250 $9,013 $9,013 0.195
118 162Ͳ27Ͳ075A 2022 LOPEZRAMIRO/JASSOPATRICIARAMIREZ 3848SAVONDALEBLVD TOLLESONAZ85353 699WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $69,900 $279,600 $349,500 $34,950 $34,950 $207,237 $20,724 $20,724 0.172
119 162Ͳ27Ͳ013 2022 LOVECCHIOFAMILYTRUST LOVECCHIOFRANK/ANUTR 301WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 301WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $113,800 $455,500 $569,300 $28,465 $28,465 $507,654 $25,383 $25,383 0.223
MARKCLUBAANDKELLYM
120 162Ͳ25Ͳ011 2022 LUBAFAMILYTRUST LUBATRUSTEESS 30WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 30WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $83,700 $334,800 $418,500 $41,850 $41,850 $279,241 $27,924 $27,924 0.236
121 162Ͳ27Ͳ057 2022 MAPELDAVIDE&JANEEKELSEY 500WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 500WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $73,400 $293,600 $367,000 $18,350 $18,350 $246,381 $12,319 $12,319 0.202
122 162Ͳ27Ͳ018 2022 MARONEYJAMES/HORNERANDREA 310WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 310WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,400 $265,700 $332,100 $16,605 $16,605 $221,323 $11,066 $11,066 0.227
MARVINVERNONSIMKINANDGAYLEVERNONSIMKIN
123 162Ͳ25Ͳ068 2022 REVOCABLETRUST 133WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 133WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $105,300 $421,200 $526,500 $52,650 $52,650 $383,335 $38,334 $38,334 0.336
124 162Ͳ27Ͳ104 2022 MARYEHARRILYNELLENREVOCABLELIVINGTRUST 499WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 499WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $99,000 $396,100 $495,100 $49,510 $49,510 $363,314 $36,331 $36,331 0.871
125 162Ͳ27Ͳ109B 2022 MASONJOANJTR 405WVERMONT PHOENIXAZ85013 405WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,400 $317,700 $397,100 $39,710 $39,710 $256,487 $25,649 $25,649 0.273
126 162Ͳ27Ͳ110B 2022 MCCABEMARKC/TRACEYR 334WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 334WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $93,700 $374,900 $468,600 $46,860 $46,860 $372,318 $37,232 $37,232 0.214
127 162Ͳ25Ͳ018 2022 MCDOWELLCLIFFORDWAYNE/NANCYS 105WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 105WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $94,700 $379,000 $473,700 $47,370 $47,370 $402,151 $40,215 $40,215 0.244
128 162Ͳ27Ͳ022 2022 MCLENNANMURDOCKDII 302WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 302WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $93,300 $373,400 $466,700 $23,335 $23,335 $340,702 $17,035 $17,035 0.299
129 162Ͳ23Ͳ084 2022 MEDLOCKMFLLC 6895ECAMELBACKRDSUITE7014 SCOTTSDALEAZ85251 37WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $249,400 $997,800 $1,247,200 $124,720 $124,720 $486,970 $48,697 $48,697 0.446
130 162Ͳ27Ͳ019 2022 MEETZERICHARD 315WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 315WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $76,700 $306,800 $383,500 $38,350 $38,350 $234,620 $23,462 $23,462 0.231
131 162Ͳ27Ͳ030 2022 MELENDREZDOUGLASCLARK 537WMISSOURI PHOENIXAZ85013 537WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,500 $290,100 $362,600 $18,130 $18,130 $211,803 $10,590 $10,590 0.190
132 162Ͳ27Ͳ078 2022 MEYERSMICHAELB/MICHELLER 522WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 522WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $90,300 $361,300 $451,600 $22,580 $22,580 $273,720 $13,686 $13,686 0.231
JOHNSONMICHAELL/LYNDEE
133 162Ͳ25Ͳ080 2022 MICHAEL&LYNDEEJOHNSONTRUST ATR 32WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 32WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $80,800 $323,500 $404,300 $20,215 $20,215 $236,542 $11,827 $11,827 0.343
SOCHACKIMICHAELA/ROBEY
134 162Ͳ23Ͳ066 2022 MICHAELADAMSOCHACKI/SUSANDEVANEROBEYTR SUSANDTR 30WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 30WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $142,300 $569,300 $711,600 $71,160 $71,160 $613,439 $61,344 $61,344 0.432
Page3of5
PROPOSEDMEDLOCKPLACEIWDDOWNERSHIPREPORT
2/22/2022
135 162Ͳ27Ͳ050 2022 MICHAELSDON 515WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 515WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $35,800 $143,300 $179,100 $17,910 $17,910 $162,750 $16,275 $16,275 0.190
136 162Ͳ27Ͳ064 2022 MIKULAJIMI 506WGEORGIA PHOENIXAZ85013 506WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $71,100 $284,500 $355,600 $35,560 $35,560 $238,313 $23,831 $23,831 0.183
137 162Ͳ23Ͳ027 2022 MILLSJEFFREYMICHAEL 39WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 39WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,700 $319,000 $398,700 $19,935 $19,935 $273,033 $13,652 $13,652 0.462
138 162Ͳ27Ͳ066 2022 MORALESHUNTFAMILYTRUST HUNTEVAND/MICHELLEMTR 505WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 505WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $81,700 $326,800 $408,500 $20,425 $20,425 $222,433 $11,122 $11,122 0.184
139 162Ͳ27Ͳ109A 2022 MOREYNATHANP/KERRIANNWAGGENER 417WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 417WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $89,000 $356,200 $445,200 $44,520 $44,520 $318,539 $31,854 $31,854 0.362
140 162Ͳ25Ͳ008A 2022 MORROWLYNNDARCY 21WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 21WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $69,300 $277,200 $346,500 $17,325 $17,325 $225,460 $11,273 $11,273 0.267
141 162Ͳ25Ͳ076 2022 MOUNTJOYRICHARDD/TITELBAUMANNER 44WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 44WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $78,800 $343,000 $421,800 $21,090 $21,090 $234,756 $11,738 $11,738 0.308
141 162Ͳ25Ͳ077 2022 MOUNTJOYRICHARDD/TITELBAUMANNER 44WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 44WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $6,900 $0 $6,900 $345 $345 $3,250 $163 $163 0.027
142 162Ͳ25Ͳ063A 2022 MP5210ͲNORTHVIEW7LLC 5210NCENTRALAVESTE102 PHOENIXAZ85012 5210NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $629,800 $1,408,100 $2,037,900 $356,633 $356,633 $1,266,974 $221,720 $221,720 0.497
142 162Ͳ25Ͳ086 2022 MP5210ͲNORTHVIEW7LLC 5210NCENTRALNO102 PHOENIXAZ85012 10WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $399,600 $0 $399,600 $69,930 $69,930 $245,111 $42,894 $42,894 0.340
142 162Ͳ25Ͳ087A 2022 MP5210ͲNORTHVIEW7LLC 5210NCENTRALNO102 PHOENIXAZ85012 5202NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $523,100 $385,400 $908,500 $158,988 $158,988 $857,063 $149,986 $149,986 0.445
143 162Ͳ27Ͳ083 2022 MULLANYJAMES/LISA 530WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 530WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $85,300 $341,400 $426,700 $21,335 $21,335 $301,106 $15,055 $15,055 0.265
144 162Ͳ23Ͳ102 2022 MUNNELLJENNIFERANN 31WPASADENAAVE#15 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,15 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
145 162Ͳ23Ͳ062 2022 MURPHYBRENDANANDREW 42WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 42WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $90,300 $361,300 $451,600 $22,580 $22,580 $319,575 $15,979 $15,979 0.432
146 162Ͳ27Ͳ121 2022 N/A N/A 343WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 520WOREGONAVE, PHOENIZ85013 $98,500 $394,100 $492,600 $24,630 $24,630 $301,898 $15,095 $15,095 0.341
147 162Ͳ27Ͳ056 2022 NASINGOETEWABERTHA 520WGEORGIA PHOENIXAZ85013 520WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,200 $249,000 $311,200 $31,120 $31,120 $214,675 $21,468 $21,468 0.186
148 162Ͳ27Ͳ082 2022 NEDINJACKIEKAYE 500WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 500WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $73,600 $294,400 $368,000 $18,400 $18,400 $213,877 $10,694 $10,694 0.165
149 162Ͳ27Ͳ070 2022 OGINOLAUREN/HILLSTEVEN 535WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 535WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,600 $250,500 $313,100 $31,310 $31,310 $188,080 $18,808 $18,808 0.191
150 162Ͳ25Ͳ004 2022 OTOOLEDANIELKEVIN/CARLYROSE 16WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 16WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $100,200 $400,800 $501,000 $25,050 $25,050 $292,258 $14,613 $14,613 0.244
151 162Ͳ23Ͳ007 2022 PARKGREGORYTODD 1005WBOULDERLN FLAGSTAFFAZ86001 28WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $126,000 $504,000 $630,000 $63,000 $63,000 $595,760 $59,576 $59,576 0.439
152 162Ͳ23Ͳ010 2022 PASADENAPALMSLLC POBOX4941 SCOTTSDALEAZ85261 16WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $215,800 $863,200 $1,079,000 $107,900 $107,900 $444,271 $44,427 $44,427 0.455
153 162Ͳ25Ͳ070 2022 PATTERSONALICE/QUAMAMYL 45WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 45WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $91,600 $366,500 $458,100 $45,810 $45,810 $297,976 $29,798 $29,798 0.240
154 162Ͳ23Ͳ058 2022 PENNEYFORDROBERT 37WCOLTER PHOENIXAZ85013 37WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $80,300 $321,300 $401,600 $40,160 $40,160 $281,900 $28,190 $28,190 0.430
155 162Ͳ27Ͳ116 2022 PERRYJOHNQ/JOANNAL 404WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 404WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $91,700 $367,000 $458,700 $22,935 $22,935 $373,944 $18,697 $18,697 0.174
156 162Ͳ27Ͳ107 2022 PONSLERKENNETHH 412WVERMONT PHOENIXAZ85013 412WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $58,500 $234,100 $292,600 $29,260 $29,260 $192,216 $19,222 $19,222 0.248
157 162Ͳ27Ͳ106 2022 PROKOPCHAKSTEFFAN/KERRY 420WVERMONT PHOENIXAZ85013 420WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $92,500 $370,300 $462,800 $46,280 $46,280 $357,544 $35,754 $35,754 0.225
RANSOM
158 162Ͳ23Ͳ067 2022 RANSOMREVOCABLELIVINGTRUST TIMOTHY/MARILYNNETR 26WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 26WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $104,400 $417,900 $522,300 $52,230 $52,230 $345,310 $34,531 $34,531 0.432
159 162Ͳ23Ͳ026
Page 436 2022 RAZINNRUSLAN/ERINMARIE 37WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 37WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $151,200 $605,100 $756,300 $37,815 $37,815 $266,386 $13,319 $13,319 0.462
160 162Ͳ27Ͳ118 2022 REASONERCRAIG 406WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 406WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $70,400 $281,800 $352,200 $17,610 $17,610 $199,141 $9,957 $9,957 0.177
161 162Ͳ25Ͳ085 2022 REDELSPERGERTIMOTHYW/HEIDI 14001NCORALGABLESDR PHOENIXAZ85023 12WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $61,700 $246,900 $308,600 $15,430 $15,430 $166,794 $8,340 $8,340 0.343
162 162Ͳ27Ͳ105 2022 REVOCABLELIVINGTRUSTOFRICHARDGGRAMHILL 20343NHAYDENRDSTE105Ͳ11 SCOTTSDALEAZ852553876 408WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $149,300 $597,400 $746,700 $74,670 $74,670 $625,738 $62,574 $62,574 0.422
163 162Ͳ23Ͳ059 2022 ROBRISLEYREVOCABLETRUST 39WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 39WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $117,500 $470,100 $587,600 $29,380 $29,380 $491,949 $24,597 $24,597 0.436
164 162Ͳ25Ͳ021 2022 ROBINETTEJAYCE/CIERA 112WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 112WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,300 $289,500 $361,800 $18,090 $18,090 $250,429 $12,521 $12,521 0.235
165 162Ͳ23Ͳ070 2022 RUIZHECTORGREGORIO/MICHELLEATR 16WMEDLOCK PHOENIXAZ85013 16WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $113,200 $452,800 $566,000 $56,600 $56,600 $418,269 $41,827 $41,827 0.432
166 162Ͳ25Ͳ082 2022 RYANANDHALLIEHOUSETRUST 18WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 18WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $120,900 $483,900 $604,800 $30,240 $30,240 $350,784 $17,539 $17,539 0.337
167 162Ͳ27Ͳ015 2022 RYANMICHAEL/KELLI 305WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 305WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $75,900 $303,600 $379,500 $37,950 $37,950 $265,944 $26,594 $26,594 0.224
168 162Ͳ23Ͳ077 2022 SALVATIERRAHECTORJ/JOANHTR 11WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 11WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $93,400 $373,900 $467,300 $23,365 $23,365 $342,032 $17,102 $17,102 0.446
168 162Ͳ25Ͳ083A 2022 SALVATIERRAHECTOR/JOANTR 11WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 16WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $71,800 $287,200 $359,000 $17,950 $17,950 $230,040 $11,502 $11,502 0.360
169 162Ͳ23Ͳ025 2022 SAPERSTEINMARKK/STELLA 33WPASADENA PHOENIXAZ85013 33WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $166,600 $666,700 $833,300 $41,665 $41,665 $336,861 $16,843 $16,843 0.462
170 162Ͳ23Ͳ057 2022 SCHANTZTIMOTHYSCOTT/MARANICOLETR 29WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 29WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $173,500 $694,100 $867,600 $86,760 $86,760 $661,814 $66,181 $66,181 0.434
171 162Ͳ25Ͳ003 2022 SCHILLERCYNTHIAA 10WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 10WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $76,800 $307,500 $384,300 $38,430 $38,430 $258,998 $25,900 $25,900 0.248
172 162Ͳ25Ͳ035 2022 SCHMITTKENDRA 4129N35THWY PHOENIXAZ85018 228WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $21,500 $0 $21,500 $2,150 $2,150 $13,297 $1,330 $1,330 0.120
172 162Ͳ25Ͳ037 2022 SCHMITTKENDRA 4129N35THWY PHOENIXAZ85018 228WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $43,200 $258,900 $302,100 $30,210 $30,210 $187,488 $18,749 $18,749 0.242
173 162Ͳ27Ͳ062 2022 SCHOUTENGREGORYT/THERESEM 524WGEORGIA PHOENIXAZ85013 524WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $91,300 $365,200 $456,500 $22,825 $22,825 $399,194 $19,960 $19,960 0.185
174 162Ͳ23Ͳ109 2022 SENSALIVINGTRUST WILKINSBRIANNAKTR 21WPASADENAAVEUNIT6 PHOENIXAZ85013 21WPASADENAAVE,6 PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.027
175 162Ͳ27Ͳ034 2022 SHAPPEECHRISTIAN 519WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 519WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $64,400 $257,900 $322,300 $16,115 $16,115 $215,266 $10,763 $10,763 0.185
176 162Ͳ23Ͳ081 2022 SHERITINTRUST MARTINTURNERB/SHERITTR 25WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 25WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $107,900 $431,700 $539,600 $53,960 $53,960 $353,113 $35,311 $35,311 0.446
177 162Ͳ23Ͳ101 2022 SHOUPJULIE 31WPASADENAAVENO14 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,14 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.017
178 162Ͳ23Ͳ011 2022 SHULTSANDPACHECOTR/ANITAHBIEDERMANNTR 1998PACIFICAVENUEAPT104 SANFRANCISCOCA94109 5070NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85013 $478,900 $22,400 $501,300 $87,728 $87,728 $316,767 $55,434 $55,434 0.455
179 162Ͳ23Ͳ078 2022 SILVIAKATHLEENWOODLOCKLIVINGTRUST 15WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 15WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $102,700 $411,100 $513,800 $51,380 $51,380 $379,161 $37,916 $37,916 0.446
180 162Ͳ27Ͳ061 2022 SMITHRYAN/MELISSA 528WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 528WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $78,300 $313,200 $391,500 $39,150 $39,150 $248,952 $24,895 $24,895 0.182
181 162Ͳ25Ͳ001 2022 SSTINVESTMENTSLLC AZIMQHOWARDLLC 5300NCENTRALAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 5300NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $562,900 $1,045,600 $1,608,500 $281,488 $281,488 $1,116,836 $195,446 $195,446 0.495
181 162Ͳ25Ͳ002 2022 SSTINVESTMENTSLLC AZIMQHOWARDLLC 5300NCENTRALAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 5242NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $271,500 $0 $271,500 $47,513 $47,513 $159,122 $27,846 $27,846 0.239
Page4of5
PROPOSEDMEDLOCKPLACEIWDDOWNERSHIPREPORT
2/22/2022
181 162Ͳ25Ͳ005 2022 SSTINVESTMENTSLLC AZIMQHOWARDLLC 5300NCENTRALAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 15WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $267,800 $0 $267,800 $46,865 $46,865 $156,906 $27,459 $27,459 0.236
182 162Ͳ27Ͳ048 2022 STAEBELLNICHOLAS/ALISON 519WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 519WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,000 $264,100 $330,100 $16,505 $16,505 $215,266 $10,763 $10,763 0.191
183 162Ͳ27Ͳ110E 2022 STENDERCRAIG/SUZANNE 340WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 340WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $83,600 $334,600 $418,200 $41,820 $41,820 $305,058 $30,506 $30,506 0.216
184 162Ͳ27Ͳ076 2022 STIGERSKARENL 506WOREGON PHOENIXAZ85013 506WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $65,800 $263,500 $329,300 $16,465 $16,465 $222,654 $11,133 $11,133 0.168
185 162Ͳ27Ͳ051 2022 STROHLJOHNJ&MARYSUE 531WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 531WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $58,100 $232,700 $290,800 $14,540 $14,540 $156,993 $7,850 $7,850 0.193
186 162Ͳ25Ͳ036A 2022 SWANSONAMANDAM 227WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 227WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $104,700 $419,100 $523,800 $26,190 $26,190 $403,346 $20,167 $20,167 0.342
187 162Ͳ23Ͳ069 2022 TAVLARIDESTHEODORE 518WELCAMINODR PHOENIXAZ85021 18WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $66,200 $264,900 $331,100 $33,110 $33,110 $216,890 $21,689 $21,689 0.432
188 162Ͳ23Ͳ092 2022 TENNEYWARRENJOHN 31WPASADENAAVEUNIT5 PHOENIXAZ85013 31WPASADENAAVE,5 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
189 162Ͳ23Ͳ005 2022 TEPPERTRACY 34WPASADENAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 34WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $130,000 $520,300 $650,300 $32,515 $32,515 $513,861 $25,693 $25,693 0.455
190 162Ͳ23Ͳ068 2022 THOMASMOLLY 20WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 20WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $128,300 $513,200 $641,500 $32,075 $32,075 $504,551 $25,228 $25,228 0.432
191 162Ͳ23Ͳ105 2022 TRACYLPANGLIVINGTRUST PANGTRACY/EGANSTEVETR 2095TANGERINECT PALMSPRINGSCA92262 21WPASADENAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $59,400 $237,800 $297,200 $29,720 $29,720 $113,432 $11,343 $11,343 0.029
192 162Ͳ23Ͳ096 2022 TREATRUST/MIHALOVICHJOHN 23260N73RDPL SCOTTSDALEAZ85255 31WPASADENAAVE,9 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.018
193 162Ͳ27Ͳ068 2022 TRIPLETHREATHOMESLLC 3202WCOUNTRYGABLESDR PHOENIXAZ85053 501WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $81,700 $327,100 $408,800 $40,880 $40,880 $320,255 $32,026 $32,026 0.238
194 162Ͳ23Ͳ091 2022 TURNERERIN 31WPASADENAAVEUNIT4 PHOENIXAZ850132051 31WPASADENAAVE,4 PHOENIX85013 $36,300 $145,200 $181,500 $18,150 $18,150 $86,136 $8,614 $8,614 0.019
195 162Ͳ23Ͳ076A 2022 UPTOWNERENTALSLLC 11221N31STPL PHOENIXAZ85020 5104NCENTRALAVE, PHOENIX85012 $218,000 $133,600 $351,600 $61,530 $61,530 $229,891 $40,231 $40,231 0.159
196 162Ͳ27Ͳ072 2022 VANNORTWICKRACHELL 521WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 521WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $79,100 $316,500 $395,600 $39,560 $39,560 $283,756 $28,376 $28,376 0.187
VULLOSTEVENMICHAEL/GINA
197 162Ͳ23Ͳ053 2022 VULLOFAMILYREVOCABLETRUST MARIECLAYTR 13WCOLTERST PHOENIXAZ85013 13WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $74,000 $296,200 $370,200 $18,510 $18,510 $248,657 $12,433 $12,433 0.432
198 162Ͳ27Ͳ111 2022 WAGGENERAMYLEIGH/JOHNETHRIDGEJR/JANELLE 325WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 325WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,300 $265,300 $331,600 $33,160 $33,160 $215,665 $21,567 $21,567 0.157
199 162Ͳ27Ͳ017 2022 WAGNEREILEENBRILL/MICHAEL 311WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85003 311WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $120,800 $483,300 $604,100 $60,410 $60,410 $510,495 $51,050 $51,050 0.230
200 162Ͳ27Ͳ041 2022 WAGSTAFFKATHERINEJ 506WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 506WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $57,500 $230,100 $287,600 $14,380 $14,380 $184,092 $9,205 $9,205 0.185
201 162Ͳ27Ͳ115 2022 WARBINGTONDOROTHYM/TIMOTHY 330WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 330WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $62,700 $251,000 $313,700 $31,370 $31,370 $127,979 $12,798 $12,798 0.176
202 162Ͳ27Ͳ108 2022 WARDJOHNR/MELISSAS 413WVERMONTAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 413WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $52,800 $211,200 $264,000 $13,200 $13,200 $202,382 $10,119 $10,119 0.311
203 162Ͳ27Ͳ035 2022 WASKEYBARBARADEE 529WMISSOURIAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 529WMISSOURIAVE, PHOENIX85013 $55,600 $222,500 $278,100 $27,810 $27,810 $171,532 $17,153 $17,153 0.184
204 162Ͳ25Ͳ066 2022 WEESJAMESF/PEREZͲJIMENEZZELDTHAVIENA 1111WOREGONAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 111WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $127,300 $509,200 $636,500 $63,650 $63,650 $594,923 $59,492 $59,492 0.234
205 162Ͳ25Ͳ016 2022 WEFLENROBERTA/CATHERINEE 49WGEORGIAAVE PHOENIXAZ85013 49WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $75,600 $302,500 $378,100 $18,905 $18,905 $211,310 $10,566 $10,566 0.242
206 162Ͳ27Ͳ053 2022 WHITECHRISTOPHERA/LAURIEM 4316WSELDONLN GLENDALEAZ85302 521WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $66,800 $267,400 $334,200 $33,420 $33,420 $222,356 $22,236 $22,236 0.189
207 162Ͳ25Ͳ078 2022 WHITESTEVENA&GERALDINEF 40WCOLTER PHOENIXAZ85013 40WCOLTERST, PHOENIX85013 $82,200 $328,900 $411,100 $20,555 $20,555 $288,175 $14,409 $14,409 0.344
208 162Ͳ27Ͳ020 2022 WIGHTTHOMAS/HUGHESKAREN POBOX256661 CHICAGOIL60625 314WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $103,100 $412,600 $515,700 $25,785 $25,785 $310,797 $15,540 $15,540 0.230
209 162Ͳ23Ͳ082
Page 437 2022 WONGBARRY 29WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 29WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $76,200 $305,000 $381,200 $19,060 $19,060 $269,037 $13,452 $13,452 0.446
210 162Ͳ23Ͳ079 2022 WONGDORIS 17WMEDLOCKDR PHOENIXAZ85013 17WMEDLOCKDR, PHOENIX85013 $70,200 $281,000 $351,200 $17,560 $17,560 $218,665 $10,933 $10,933 0.446
211 162Ͳ27Ͳ114 2022 WONGRODINY&SOPHIA 9236N16THPL PHOENIXAZ85020 345WGEORGIAAVE, PHOENIX85013 $64,800 $259,500 $324,300 $32,430 $32,430 $207,582 $20,758 $20,758 0.237
212 162Ͳ27Ͳ002 2022 WOODTRUST WOODRUTHSTR 398WVERMONT PHOENIXAZ85013 398WVERMONTAVE, PHOENIX85013 $72,600 $290,700 $363,300 $36,330 $36,330 $233,958 $23,396 $23,396 0.392
213 162Ͳ25Ͳ026 2022 YORKFAMILYTRUST YORKGEORGEATR POBOX10750 PHOENIXAZ85064 120WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $50,700 $284,800 $335,500 $16,775 $16,775 $210,951 $10,548 $10,548 0.231
213 162Ͳ25Ͳ028 2022 YORKFAMILYTRUST YORKGEORGEATR POBOX10750 PHOENIXAZ85064 120WOREGONAVE, PHOENIX85013 $20,400 $0 $20,400 $2,040 $2,040 $12,839 $1,284 $1,284 0.093
$24,363,000 $75,229,700 $99,592,700 $8,795,016 $8,790,828 $64,555,332 $5,750,238 $5,746,050 60.913 0.264
Page5of5
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
American Water College Contract - RFA-2122-WST-343 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-48826)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with American Water College to provide Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
Certification Online Training for the Water Services Department. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of
the contract will not exceed $105,000.
Summary
The agreement will provide online Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ) Operator Certification training. Arizona Administrative Code Section R18-5-
106 requires operators from all four disciplines (Water Treatment, Water Distribution,
Wastewater Collection and Wastewater Treatment) to obtain ADEQ Operator
Certifications. To obtain the certification, operators must pass a test in their specific
discipline and grade level. The examinations for the Operator Certification Program are
provided by the Association of Boards of Certification (ABC). This agreement will
provide training that follows specific criteria and content that are covered in the ABC
Exams. American Water College is currently the accredited and certified provider of the
online preparation training for all disciplines and grade levels necessary to satisfy the
specific criteria of the ABC. This agreement will allow WSD to continue to provide the
necessary training for critical required certifications.
Procurement Information
In accordance with A.R. 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Special Circumstances
Without Competition. American Water College is the only accredited college that
provides the customized training for the ADEQ Certification with 24 hour, 7 days-a-
week online availability to the self-paced training that provides efficiency and flexibility
to the learning process.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a three-year term.
Page 438
Financial Impact
The total agreement value will not exceed $105,000.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 439
Report
(Ordinance S-48826)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with American Water College to provide Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
Certification Online Training for the Water Services Department. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of
the contract will not exceed $105,000.
Summary
The agreement will provide online Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ) Operator Certification training. Arizona Administrative Code Section R18-5-
106 requires operators from all four disciplines (Water Treatment, Water Distribution,
Wastewater Collection and Wastewater Treatment) to obtain ADEQ Operator
Certifications. To obtain the certification, operators must pass a test in their specific
discipline and grade level. The examinations for the Operator Certification Program are
provided by the Association of Boards of Certification (ABC). This agreement will
provide training that follows specific criteria and content that are covered in the ABC
Exams. American Water College is currently the accredited and certified provider of the
online preparation training for all disciplines and grade levels necessary to satisfy the
specific criteria of the ABC. This agreement will allow WSD to continue to provide the
necessary training for critical required certifications.
Procurement Information
In accordance with A.R. 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Special Circumstances
Without Competition. American Water College is the only accredited college that
provides the customized training for the ADEQ Certification with 24 hour, 7 days-a-
week online availability to the self-paced training that provides efficiency and flexibility
to the learning process.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a three-year term.
Page 438
Financial Impact
The total agreement value will not exceed $105,000.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 439
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Work and Asset Management (WAM) Migration Consulting Services Contract -
Request for Award (Ordinance S-48831)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
TMG Utility Advisory Services, Inc., to provide Work and Asset Management consulting
and project management services for the Water Services Department. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value
of the contract will not exceed $3,562,320.
Summary
This contract will provide migration consulting services for the transition of the Water
Services Department's (WSD) ITS Oracle Work and Asset Management (WAM) 1.9X
solution to an Oracle WAM 2.X solution. WSD uses Oracle’s WAM version 1.9X to
document work and asset management activities. WAM 1.9X is no longer supported by
Oracle and is at its end-of-life.
Offeror's services include but are not limited to: project oversight and management,
change management, assessments, recommendations, design, migration and post-
implementation support.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL). A Call for
Task Order was sent to the vendors on the QVL. Three Offerors submitted proposals
and were deemed to be responsive and responsible.
Offerors
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
TMG Utility Advisory Services, Inc.
Woolpert, Inc.
Page 440
An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following
criteria:
Qualifications and Experience (0-250 points);
Project Approach (0-225 points);
Capabilities (0-200 points);
Qualifications of Personnel (0-175 points); and
Price (0-150 points).
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following offeror:
Selected Bidders
TMG Utility Advisory Services, Inc.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a three-year term with two one-
year options to extend.
Financial Impact
The contract value will not exceed $3,562,320.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Capital Improvement Program
budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 441
Report
Request for Award (Ordinance S-48831)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
TMG Utility Advisory Services, Inc., to provide Work and Asset Management consulting
and project management services for the Water Services Department. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value
of the contract will not exceed $3,562,320.
Summary
This contract will provide migration consulting services for the transition of the Water
Services Department's (WSD) ITS Oracle Work and Asset Management (WAM) 1.9X
solution to an Oracle WAM 2.X solution. WSD uses Oracle’s WAM version 1.9X to
document work and asset management activities. WAM 1.9X is no longer supported by
Oracle and is at its end-of-life.
Offeror's services include but are not limited to: project oversight and management,
change management, assessments, recommendations, design, migration and post-
implementation support.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL). A Call for
Task Order was sent to the vendors on the QVL. Three Offerors submitted proposals
and were deemed to be responsive and responsible.
Offerors
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
TMG Utility Advisory Services, Inc.
Woolpert, Inc.
Page 440
An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following
criteria:
Qualifications and Experience (0-250 points);
Project Approach (0-225 points);
Capabilities (0-200 points);
Qualifications of Personnel (0-175 points); and
Price (0-150 points).
After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following offeror:
Selected Bidders
TMG Utility Advisory Services, Inc.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a three-year term with two one-
year options to extend.
Financial Impact
The contract value will not exceed $3,562,320.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Capital Improvement Program
budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 441
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Inspection and Repair of Hoist and Cranes - Amendment (Ordinance S-48833)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 150346 with American Inspection and Test, Inc., to provide additional funding
for inspection and repair of hoists and cranes. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures
included in the amendment will not exceed $178,100.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional payment authority that is
necessary due to the increased costs of parts and increased need for incremental
services.
Preventative maintenance and repairs are required on an as-needed basis for the 114
overhead hoists and cranes to comply with all American National Standards Institute
standards and remain in safe operating condition. The City uses hoists and cranes for
various work applications that are vital to daily operations. The additional funds will
allow American Inspection and Test, Inc. to continue to perform inspections,
preventative maintenance, and repairs for various sized overhead hoists and cranes
for the Water Services, Aviation, and Phoenix Convention Center Departments.
Contract Term
The term of the contract will remain unchanged and will expire on June 30, 2024.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for the contract was for an expenditure not-to-exceed
$325,000. Amendments increased the authorization for the contract by $94,800. This
amendment will increase the authorization for the contract by an additional $178,100,
for a new amount not to exceed of $597,900.
Funding for the amendment is available in the Water Services and Aviation
departments' Operating budgets.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
Page 442
· Inspection and Repair of Hoists and Cranes Contract 150346 (Ordinance S-45797)
on June 19, 2019;
· Inspection and Repair of Hoists and Cranes Contract 150346 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-46159) on Nov. 20, 2019; and
· Inspection and Repair of Hoists and Cranes Contract 150346 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-48081) on Nov. 3, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services and the Aviation Departments.
Page 443
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 150346 with American Inspection and Test, Inc., to provide additional funding
for inspection and repair of hoists and cranes. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures
included in the amendment will not exceed $178,100.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional payment authority that is
necessary due to the increased costs of parts and increased need for incremental
services.
Preventative maintenance and repairs are required on an as-needed basis for the 114
overhead hoists and cranes to comply with all American National Standards Institute
standards and remain in safe operating condition. The City uses hoists and cranes for
various work applications that are vital to daily operations. The additional funds will
allow American Inspection and Test, Inc. to continue to perform inspections,
preventative maintenance, and repairs for various sized overhead hoists and cranes
for the Water Services, Aviation, and Phoenix Convention Center Departments.
Contract Term
The term of the contract will remain unchanged and will expire on June 30, 2024.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for the contract was for an expenditure not-to-exceed
$325,000. Amendments increased the authorization for the contract by $94,800. This
amendment will increase the authorization for the contract by an additional $178,100,
for a new amount not to exceed of $597,900.
Funding for the amendment is available in the Water Services and Aviation
departments' Operating budgets.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
Page 442
· Inspection and Repair of Hoists and Cranes Contract 150346 (Ordinance S-45797)
on June 19, 2019;
· Inspection and Repair of Hoists and Cranes Contract 150346 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-46159) on Nov. 20, 2019; and
· Inspection and Repair of Hoists and Cranes Contract 150346 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-48081) on Nov. 3, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services and the Aviation Departments.
Page 443
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Arizona Public Service Trenching Agreement for City of Phoenix Waterline
Improvements for Zone 3D/4A - WS85500442 (Ordinance S-48837)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Agreement
with Arizona Public Service, to install underground distribution facilities for project
WS85500442 Waterline Improvements for Zone 3D/4A. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Additionally, request to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to
authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification
and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix
City Code 42-18.
Summary
The City is installing a new waterline for Zone 3D/4A Improvements that will require the
installation of new underground electrical facilities. The Trenching Agreement is
required by Arizona Public Service (APS) in order to proceed with electrical design, as
well as installation of necessary facilities to provide power for the City’s requested
needs.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022, and will expire when
the project is completed and accepted.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix for this agreement.
Location
24th Street and Northern Avenue
Council District: 3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Street Transportation and Water Services departments.
Page 444
Report
Improvements for Zone 3D/4A - WS85500442 (Ordinance S-48837)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Agreement
with Arizona Public Service, to install underground distribution facilities for project
WS85500442 Waterline Improvements for Zone 3D/4A. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Additionally, request to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to
authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification
and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix
City Code 42-18.
Summary
The City is installing a new waterline for Zone 3D/4A Improvements that will require the
installation of new underground electrical facilities. The Trenching Agreement is
required by Arizona Public Service (APS) in order to proceed with electrical design, as
well as installation of necessary facilities to provide power for the City’s requested
needs.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022, and will expire when
the project is completed and accepted.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix for this agreement.
Location
24th Street and Northern Avenue
Council District: 3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Street Transportation and Water Services departments.
Page 444
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Security Access Controls Contract - RFA 2122-WPC-361 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-48843)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Wilson Electric Services Corporation, to provide Security Access Controls for the
Water Services Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $1
million.
Summary
This contract will provide the Water Services Department software and equipment to
support badging workstations, card readers, and access controllers that are used to
secure facilities, including key sensitive areas and their assets to upgrade and
maintain the security access control system.
Wilson Electric Services Corporation's services include but are not limited to: supply of
on-site services and materials necessary to support existing Andover Continuum, and
HID Indala access control systems and to upgrade additional sites' video surveillance
on an as-needed basis, provide all necessary labor to upgrade software and graphics,
replace system components, repair faulty equipment, convert and integrate access
control systems and to provide miscellaneous parts.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo: Special Circumstance - Without
Competition based on the following reason: Wilson Electric Services Corporation is the
authorized representative in Arizona for performing maintenance and upgrades on the
manufacturer’s equipment.
Contract Term
The contract term will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a three-year term with two,
one-year options to extend.
Page 445
Financial Impact
The contract value for Wilson Electric Services Corporation will not exceed $1 million.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 446
Report
(Ordinance S-48843)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Wilson Electric Services Corporation, to provide Security Access Controls for the
Water Services Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $1
million.
Summary
This contract will provide the Water Services Department software and equipment to
support badging workstations, card readers, and access controllers that are used to
secure facilities, including key sensitive areas and their assets to upgrade and
maintain the security access control system.
Wilson Electric Services Corporation's services include but are not limited to: supply of
on-site services and materials necessary to support existing Andover Continuum, and
HID Indala access control systems and to upgrade additional sites' video surveillance
on an as-needed basis, provide all necessary labor to upgrade software and graphics,
replace system components, repair faulty equipment, convert and integrate access
control systems and to provide miscellaneous parts.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo: Special Circumstance - Without
Competition based on the following reason: Wilson Electric Services Corporation is the
authorized representative in Arizona for performing maintenance and upgrades on the
manufacturer’s equipment.
Contract Term
The contract term will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a three-year term with two,
one-year options to extend.
Page 445
Financial Impact
The contract value for Wilson Electric Services Corporation will not exceed $1 million.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 446
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Oracle Mobile Workforce Management Upgrade Services - RFA 2122-WTS-477
Request for Award (Ordinance S-48849)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Ernst & Young US LLP, to provide Oracle Mobile Workforce Management upgrade
services for the Water Services Department. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will
not exceed $1.1 million.
Summary
This contract will provide an upgrade to the current Oracle Mobile Workforce
Management (MWM) system in use by the Water Services Department (WSD).
Approximately seventy crew shifts per day use fifty-four various field activity types to
complete on average six hundred field activities. About fifteen dispatchers use the
system daily to dispatch crew to complete the field activities. The integration product
used to interface with Oracle Customer Care and Billing system is Process Integration
Pack for Field Work.
The Water Services Department requests an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code
42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of a
limitation of liability provision that otherwise would be prohibited by City Code Section
42-18, to reflect the liability will be no more than five times the contract value.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition.
Ernst & Young US LLP currently supports MWM and is knowledgeable in all of the
custom configuration used by WSD. The utility application support as well as support
for MWM is very specialized and unique. Seeking competition to contract with another
system integrator would be cost prohibitive due to the complexity of the MWM custom
Page 447
configuration and would pose a budgetary risk to the City.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a 1-year term.
Financial Impact
The contract value will not exceed $1.1 million.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Capital Improvement Program
budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 448
Report
Request for Award (Ordinance S-48849)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Ernst & Young US LLP, to provide Oracle Mobile Workforce Management upgrade
services for the Water Services Department. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will
not exceed $1.1 million.
Summary
This contract will provide an upgrade to the current Oracle Mobile Workforce
Management (MWM) system in use by the Water Services Department (WSD).
Approximately seventy crew shifts per day use fifty-four various field activity types to
complete on average six hundred field activities. About fifteen dispatchers use the
system daily to dispatch crew to complete the field activities. The integration product
used to interface with Oracle Customer Care and Billing system is Process Integration
Pack for Field Work.
The Water Services Department requests an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code
42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of a
limitation of liability provision that otherwise would be prohibited by City Code Section
42-18, to reflect the liability will be no more than five times the contract value.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition.
Ernst & Young US LLP currently supports MWM and is knowledgeable in all of the
custom configuration used by WSD. The utility application support as well as support
for MWM is very specialized and unique. Seeking competition to contract with another
system integrator would be cost prohibitive due to the complexity of the MWM custom
Page 447
configuration and would pose a budgetary risk to the City.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a 1-year term.
Financial Impact
The contract value will not exceed $1.1 million.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Capital Improvement Program
budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 448
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Authorization to Enter into a Supplemental Agreement with the United States,
Central Arizona Water Conservation District and Others for Further Participation
in the Colorado River 500+ Plan; Amend Ordinance S-48254 (Ordinance S-48859)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a supplemental
agreement with the United States, Central Arizona Water Conservation District and
Others, to forgo delivery of a volume of Phoenix’s Colorado River entitlement in 2022,
as system conservation, in return for compensation. Further request to amend
Ordinance S-48254 so that total compensated system conservation for 2022, when
combined with the supplemental agreement, will be up to 30,000 acre-feet. Additionally
request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this item. The
compensation for all system conservation will not exceed $7,848,000.
Summary
Due to worsening conditions on the Colorado River, the Lower Basin states of Arizona,
California and Nevada have determined there is an unacceptable risk of the water
volumes in Lake Mead dropping below elevation 1,030 feet in the near term. Due to
the risks to deliveries throughout the Lower Basin, the Lower Basin states and the U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation have determined it will require a 500,000 acre-feet (AF)
reduction in deliveries from Lake Mead each year through 2026 to feasibly protect
Lake Mead from catastrophic risk. This reduction is referred to as the 500+ Plan.
In January of 2022, the Council adopted Ordinance S-48254, which authorized
execution of Agreement 156216 to forbear delivery of 15,977 AF of Phoenix’s Colorado
River entitlement to support the 500+ Plan. At the time, it was anticipated that the
Lower Basin States had received sufficient volumes of water from other water users to
achieve its goal of 500,000 AF. Since that time, several large water users, including
entities in California, have determined they will be unable to provide water for the 500+
Plan in 2022.
The Gila River Indian Community has been working with stakeholders to attempt to
find additional volumes to increase the amount of system conservation being created
in 2022. Phoenix can forbear additional water in 2022, up to a total of 30,000 AF in
order to create system conservation under the 500+ plan.
Page 449
Due to technical errors in Ordinance S-48254, Ordinance S-48254 will be amended for
the City to forbear 15,997 AF of Colorado River water at $261.60/AF and receive a
total of $4,184,815.20 with a termination date of Dec. 31, 2022, and to provide that the
funds will be placed in the Water Revenue Fund and used to purchase replacement
water, including credits, and to support water conservation programs.
Under the supplemental agreement, the City will forbear up to an additional 14,003 AF
of Colorado River water at $261.60/AF and receive a total of up to $3,663,184.80. The
agreement is with United States, Central Arizona Water Conservation District and/or
others as necessary to forbear the additional water.
Contract Term
Both agreements will terminate on Dec. 31, 2022. Agreement 156216 includes the
option for renewal to create system conservation through 2026. City Council approval
will be required for each year Phoenix agrees to forbear water in the 500+ Plan.
Financial Impact
Phoenix will receive compensation in the amount of $4,184,815.20 from Agreement
156216 and up to $3,663,184.80 from the supplemental agreement for a total of up to
$7,848,000. The funds will be placed in the Water Revenue Fund and used to
purchase replacement water, including credits, and to support water conservation
programs.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Agreement 156216 (Ordinance S-48254) on Jan. 5, 2022.
Location
Council District: Out of City
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 450
Report
Central Arizona Water Conservation District and Others for Further Participation
in the Colorado River 500+ Plan; Amend Ordinance S-48254 (Ordinance S-48859)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a supplemental
agreement with the United States, Central Arizona Water Conservation District and
Others, to forgo delivery of a volume of Phoenix’s Colorado River entitlement in 2022,
as system conservation, in return for compensation. Further request to amend
Ordinance S-48254 so that total compensated system conservation for 2022, when
combined with the supplemental agreement, will be up to 30,000 acre-feet. Additionally
request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this item. The
compensation for all system conservation will not exceed $7,848,000.
Summary
Due to worsening conditions on the Colorado River, the Lower Basin states of Arizona,
California and Nevada have determined there is an unacceptable risk of the water
volumes in Lake Mead dropping below elevation 1,030 feet in the near term. Due to
the risks to deliveries throughout the Lower Basin, the Lower Basin states and the U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation have determined it will require a 500,000 acre-feet (AF)
reduction in deliveries from Lake Mead each year through 2026 to feasibly protect
Lake Mead from catastrophic risk. This reduction is referred to as the 500+ Plan.
In January of 2022, the Council adopted Ordinance S-48254, which authorized
execution of Agreement 156216 to forbear delivery of 15,977 AF of Phoenix’s Colorado
River entitlement to support the 500+ Plan. At the time, it was anticipated that the
Lower Basin States had received sufficient volumes of water from other water users to
achieve its goal of 500,000 AF. Since that time, several large water users, including
entities in California, have determined they will be unable to provide water for the 500+
Plan in 2022.
The Gila River Indian Community has been working with stakeholders to attempt to
find additional volumes to increase the amount of system conservation being created
in 2022. Phoenix can forbear additional water in 2022, up to a total of 30,000 AF in
order to create system conservation under the 500+ plan.
Page 449
Due to technical errors in Ordinance S-48254, Ordinance S-48254 will be amended for
the City to forbear 15,997 AF of Colorado River water at $261.60/AF and receive a
total of $4,184,815.20 with a termination date of Dec. 31, 2022, and to provide that the
funds will be placed in the Water Revenue Fund and used to purchase replacement
water, including credits, and to support water conservation programs.
Under the supplemental agreement, the City will forbear up to an additional 14,003 AF
of Colorado River water at $261.60/AF and receive a total of up to $3,663,184.80. The
agreement is with United States, Central Arizona Water Conservation District and/or
others as necessary to forbear the additional water.
Contract Term
Both agreements will terminate on Dec. 31, 2022. Agreement 156216 includes the
option for renewal to create system conservation through 2026. City Council approval
will be required for each year Phoenix agrees to forbear water in the 500+ Plan.
Financial Impact
Phoenix will receive compensation in the amount of $4,184,815.20 from Agreement
156216 and up to $3,663,184.80 from the supplemental agreement for a total of up to
$7,848,000. The funds will be placed in the Water Revenue Fund and used to
purchase replacement water, including credits, and to support water conservation
programs.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Agreement 156216 (Ordinance S-48254) on Jan. 5, 2022.
Location
Council District: Out of City
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 450
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Purchase of Polymers for Water Treatment and Production - Amendment
(Ordinance S-48863)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 146988 with Polydyne Inc., to provide additional time and funding to the
agreement. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The additional expenditures included in this amendment will not
exceed $16,862,000.
Summary
The purpose of the amendment is to extend the term of the agreement for an
additional one year to allow the volatile market to stabilize before soliciting for the
polymer. The current polymer market is volatile with surges and significant shifting in
supply and demand. The polymer market has experienced increases in pricing
between 20-30 percent over the past year. Additional funding is requested to support
purchase of polymers on this agreement and to account for variances in price that
have been absorbed over the past year.
This agreement will provide Cationic polymers used at the 91st and 23rd Avenue
Wastewater Treatment Plants. Polymers are necessary for removing organic matter
from water and are used to condition solids while improving dewatering efficiency.
Contract Term
This amendment will extend the end date of the contract term from Feb. 28, 2023 to
Feb. 28, 2024.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for Contract 146988 was for an expenditure not-to-exceed $25
million. This amendment will increase the authorization for the contract by an
additional $16,862,000, for a new total not-to-exceed contract value of $41,862,000.
Funding for this amendment is available in the Water Services Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Contract 146988 (Ordinance S-44265) on Feb. 21, 2018.
Page 451
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 452
Report
(Ordinance S-48863)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 146988 with Polydyne Inc., to provide additional time and funding to the
agreement. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The additional expenditures included in this amendment will not
exceed $16,862,000.
Summary
The purpose of the amendment is to extend the term of the agreement for an
additional one year to allow the volatile market to stabilize before soliciting for the
polymer. The current polymer market is volatile with surges and significant shifting in
supply and demand. The polymer market has experienced increases in pricing
between 20-30 percent over the past year. Additional funding is requested to support
purchase of polymers on this agreement and to account for variances in price that
have been absorbed over the past year.
This agreement will provide Cationic polymers used at the 91st and 23rd Avenue
Wastewater Treatment Plants. Polymers are necessary for removing organic matter
from water and are used to condition solids while improving dewatering efficiency.
Contract Term
This amendment will extend the end date of the contract term from Feb. 28, 2023 to
Feb. 28, 2024.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for Contract 146988 was for an expenditure not-to-exceed $25
million. This amendment will increase the authorization for the contract by an
additional $16,862,000, for a new total not-to-exceed contract value of $41,862,000.
Funding for this amendment is available in the Water Services Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Contract 146988 (Ordinance S-44265) on Feb. 21, 2018.
Page 451
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 452
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Custom Analytical Standards Contract - IFB-2122-WES-331 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-48879)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with Absolute Standards, Inc., OGMIS Group, Inc. and Restek Corporation
to provide custom analytical standards for the Water Services Department. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
aggregate value of the agreements will not exceed $225,000.
Summary
The agreements will provide the Water Services Department with the ability to conduct
custom analytical standards testing as required for both regulatory compliance and
process control. The City requires many analytical reference standards for calibration
and verification of laboratory equipment to comply with federal, state and local
regulations. The Water Services Department will use the products included in these
contracts to perform hundreds of tests each day to ensure that water treatment
process control objectives are accomplished.
Procurement Information
The recommendations were made using an Invitation for Bid procurement process in
accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.
Seven vendors submitted bids and are listed below and all bids except four were found
to responsive and responsible. Following an evaluation based on price, the
procurement officer recommends award to the following vendors:
Selected Bidders
Absolute Standards, Inc. $18,300
Restek Corporation $39,222
OGMIS Group Inc. $39,515
Additional Bidders
AccuStandard, Inc.
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Chem Service, Inc.
Page 453
Phenova, Inc.
Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, for a five-year term.
Financial Impact
The aggregate agreements value will not exceed $225,000.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating Budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 454
Report
(Ordinance S-48879)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with Absolute Standards, Inc., OGMIS Group, Inc. and Restek Corporation
to provide custom analytical standards for the Water Services Department. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
aggregate value of the agreements will not exceed $225,000.
Summary
The agreements will provide the Water Services Department with the ability to conduct
custom analytical standards testing as required for both regulatory compliance and
process control. The City requires many analytical reference standards for calibration
and verification of laboratory equipment to comply with federal, state and local
regulations. The Water Services Department will use the products included in these
contracts to perform hundreds of tests each day to ensure that water treatment
process control objectives are accomplished.
Procurement Information
The recommendations were made using an Invitation for Bid procurement process in
accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.
Seven vendors submitted bids and are listed below and all bids except four were found
to responsive and responsible. Following an evaluation based on price, the
procurement officer recommends award to the following vendors:
Selected Bidders
Absolute Standards, Inc. $18,300
Restek Corporation $39,222
OGMIS Group Inc. $39,515
Additional Bidders
AccuStandard, Inc.
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Chem Service, Inc.
Page 453
Phenova, Inc.
Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about Aug. 1, 2022, for a five-year term.
Financial Impact
The aggregate agreements value will not exceed $225,000.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating Budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 454
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Water Services Department Water Main Replacement Program
Engineering/Consulting On-Call Services (Ordinance S-48881)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into eight separate
agreements with the consultants listed in Attachment A, to provide Water Main
Replacement Engineering/Consulting On-Call services for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreements
as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for
services will not exceed $16 million.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications; cable
television; railroads; and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.
Summary
The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing Water Main Replacement
Program Engineering/Consulting On-Call Services that include, but are not limited to:
data collection and field survey; design services which include preparation of plans
and specifications, asset preparation, cost estimates, field survey, and construction
administration and inspection.
Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Seventeen firms submitted
Page 455
proposals and are listed in Attachment A.
Contract Term
The term of each agreement is up to two years, beginning on or about July 1, 2022, or
up to $2 million, whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the agreement. No additional changes may be executed
after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for each of the On-Call consultants will not exceed $2 million,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services will not
exceed $16 million.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve funding
availability prior to issuance of any On-Call task order of $100,000 or more. Payments
may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may
extend past the agreement termination.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 456
ATTACHMENT A
Selected Firms
Rank 1: Entellus, Inc.
Rank 2: GHD Inc.
Rank 3: Sunrise Engineering, Inc.
Rank 4: Wilson Engineers, LLC
Rank 5: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Rank 6: Strand Associates, Inc.
Rank 7: Ritoch-Powell & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. dba
RPA, an Ardurra Company
Rank 8: Project Engineering Consultants, LLC
Additional Proposers
Rank 9: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Rank 10: Burgess & Niple, Inc.
Rank 11: EPS Group, Inc.
Rank 12: Olsson, Inc.
Rank 13: Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Rank 14: Greeley and Hansen, LLC
Rank 15: Michael Baker International, Inc.
Rank 16: GLHN Architects and Engineers, Inc.
Rank 17: LLOYD Consulting Group, LLC
Page 457
Report
Engineering/Consulting On-Call Services (Ordinance S-48881)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into eight separate
agreements with the consultants listed in Attachment A, to provide Water Main
Replacement Engineering/Consulting On-Call services for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreements
as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for
services will not exceed $16 million.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications; cable
television; railroads; and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.
Summary
The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing Water Main Replacement
Program Engineering/Consulting On-Call Services that include, but are not limited to:
data collection and field survey; design services which include preparation of plans
and specifications, asset preparation, cost estimates, field survey, and construction
administration and inspection.
Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Seventeen firms submitted
Page 455
proposals and are listed in Attachment A.
Contract Term
The term of each agreement is up to two years, beginning on or about July 1, 2022, or
up to $2 million, whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the agreement. No additional changes may be executed
after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for each of the On-Call consultants will not exceed $2 million,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services will not
exceed $16 million.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve funding
availability prior to issuance of any On-Call task order of $100,000 or more. Payments
may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may
extend past the agreement termination.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 456
ATTACHMENT A
Selected Firms
Rank 1: Entellus, Inc.
Rank 2: GHD Inc.
Rank 3: Sunrise Engineering, Inc.
Rank 4: Wilson Engineers, LLC
Rank 5: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Rank 6: Strand Associates, Inc.
Rank 7: Ritoch-Powell & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. dba
RPA, an Ardurra Company
Rank 8: Project Engineering Consultants, LLC
Additional Proposers
Rank 9: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Rank 10: Burgess & Niple, Inc.
Rank 11: EPS Group, Inc.
Rank 12: Olsson, Inc.
Rank 13: Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Rank 14: Greeley and Hansen, LLC
Rank 15: Michael Baker International, Inc.
Rank 16: GLHN Architects and Engineers, Inc.
Rank 17: LLOYD Consulting Group, LLC
Page 457
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Final Plat - The Hacienda at Carefree - PLAT 210108 - South of Carefree Highway
and East of 42nd Street
Plat: 210108
Project: 16-3597
Name of Plat: The Hacienda at Carefree
Owner: AABS Properties, LLC
Engineer: Ryan Denton Gilbert
Request: A One-Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: June 2, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at south of Carefree Highway and east of 42nd Street
Council District: 2
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 458
Report
and East of 42nd Street
Plat: 210108
Project: 16-3597
Name of Plat: The Hacienda at Carefree
Owner: AABS Properties, LLC
Engineer: Ryan Denton Gilbert
Request: A One-Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: June 2, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at south of Carefree Highway and east of 42nd Street
Council District: 2
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 458
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Final Plat - The Cove Apartments - PLAT 210109 - 1526 W. Desert Cove Ave.
Plat: 210109
Project: 21-4193
Name of Plat: The Cove Apartments
Owner: DC Apartments, LLC
Engineer: David S. Klein, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Development
Reviewed by Staff: May 25, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Located at 1526 W. Desert Cove Ave.
Council District: 3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 459
Report
Plat: 210109
Project: 21-4193
Name of Plat: The Cove Apartments
Owner: DC Apartments, LLC
Engineer: David S. Klein, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Development
Reviewed by Staff: May 25, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Located at 1526 W. Desert Cove Ave.
Council District: 3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 459
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Final Plat - The Urban Encanto - PLAT 210099 - North of Earll Drive East of 19th
Avenue
Plat: 210099
Project: 18-2388
Name of Plat: The Urban Encanto
Owner: Madison at Encanto, LLC
Engineer: Dennis Frank Keogh, RLS
Request: An 18 Lot Residential Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: June 8, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located north of Earll Drive, east of 19th Avenue.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 460
Report
Avenue
Plat: 210099
Project: 18-2388
Name of Plat: The Urban Encanto
Owner: Madison at Encanto, LLC
Engineer: Dennis Frank Keogh, RLS
Request: An 18 Lot Residential Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: June 8, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located north of Earll Drive, east of 19th Avenue.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 460
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Final Plat - Tract E of 2200 E. Bethany - PLAT 220014 - 6204 N. 22nd St.
Plat: 220014
Project: 99-36020
Name of Plat: Tract E of 2200 E. Bethany
Owner: Michael and Kathleen Arnold Family Trust
Engineer: Jeff R. Cook
Request: A One-Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: May 26, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at 6204 N. 22nd St.
Council District: 6
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 461
Report
Plat: 220014
Project: 99-36020
Name of Plat: Tract E of 2200 E. Bethany
Owner: Michael and Kathleen Arnold Family Trust
Engineer: Jeff R. Cook
Request: A One-Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: May 26, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at 6204 N. 22nd St.
Council District: 6
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 461
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Final Plat - Montana Del Sur - PLAT 210064 - Southwest Corner of 47th Avenue
and Southern Avenue
Plat: 210064
Project: 13-1098
Name of Plat: Montana Del Sur
Owner: Montana Del Sur Owner, LLC
Engineer: Colin D. Harvey
Request: A 47-Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: May 31, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at the southwest corner of 47th Avenue and Southern Avenue.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 462
Report
and Southern Avenue
Plat: 210064
Project: 13-1098
Name of Plat: Montana Del Sur
Owner: Montana Del Sur Owner, LLC
Engineer: Colin D. Harvey
Request: A 47-Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: May 31, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at the southwest corner of 47th Avenue and Southern Avenue.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 462
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Final Plat - Ragsdale - PLAT 210074 - Northwest Corner of 12th Street and
Washington Street
Plat: 210074
Project: 20-705
Name of Plat: Ragsdale
Owner: Ragsdale Apartments QOZB, LLC
Engineer: James A. Loftis, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: May 27, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located on the northwest corner of 12th Street and Washington Street.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 463
Report
Washington Street
Plat: 210074
Project: 20-705
Name of Plat: Ragsdale
Owner: Ragsdale Apartments QOZB, LLC
Engineer: James A. Loftis, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: May 27, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located on the northwest corner of 12th Street and Washington Street.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 463
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Final Plat - Dunkin-Gardners Enclave - PLAT 210085 - Southwest Corner of 34th
Place and Baseline Road
Plat: 210085
Project: 13-3085
Name of Plat: Dunkin-Gardners Enclave
Owner: RW 3401 Baseline LLC, Southpaw Arizona RE, LLC
Engineer: David S. Klein
Request: A Two-Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: June 1, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at southwest corner of 34th Place and Baseline Road
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 464
Report
Place and Baseline Road
Plat: 210085
Project: 13-3085
Name of Plat: Dunkin-Gardners Enclave
Owner: RW 3401 Baseline LLC, Southpaw Arizona RE, LLC
Engineer: David S. Klein
Request: A Two-Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: June 1, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at southwest corner of 34th Place and Baseline Road
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 464
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Final Plat - 2102 North 26th Place - PLAT 210097 - 2102 N. 26th Place
Plat: 210097
Project: 03-2085
Name of Plat: 2102 North 26th Place
Owner: Amar J. Kohli
Engineer: Mike F. Jennings, RLS
Request: A 3 Lot Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: June 6, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at 2102 N. 26th Place.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 465
Report
Plat: 210097
Project: 03-2085
Name of Plat: 2102 North 26th Place
Owner: Amar J. Kohli
Engineer: Mike F. Jennings, RLS
Request: A 3 Lot Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: June 6, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at 2102 N. 26th Place.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 465
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 200564 - Southeast Corner of 29th Avenue
and Georgia Avenue (Resolution 22046)
Abandonment: ABND 200564
Project: 99-817
Applicant: James Kossler, Grand Canyon University
Request: To abandon 16-foot Public Utility Easement bounded by parcels APN: 153-19
-041, 153-19-042, 153-19-040, 153-19-043, 153-19-039, 153-19-044, 153-19-038 and
153-19-045C.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Dec. 21, 2020
Summary
This abandonment is one of three being processed together to complete an
abandonment of a former alley/retained Public Utility Easement. All three resolutions of
abandonment (ABND 200564, ABND 210050, and ABND 210064) should be recorded
together, on the same day, with the Maricopa County Recorder. No particular
sequence of recording is required.
Location
Southeast corner of 29th Avenue and Georgia Avenue.
Council District: 5
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 466
Report
and Georgia Avenue (Resolution 22046)
Abandonment: ABND 200564
Project: 99-817
Applicant: James Kossler, Grand Canyon University
Request: To abandon 16-foot Public Utility Easement bounded by parcels APN: 153-19
-041, 153-19-042, 153-19-040, 153-19-043, 153-19-039, 153-19-044, 153-19-038 and
153-19-045C.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Dec. 21, 2020
Summary
This abandonment is one of three being processed together to complete an
abandonment of a former alley/retained Public Utility Easement. All three resolutions of
abandonment (ABND 200564, ABND 210050, and ABND 210064) should be recorded
together, on the same day, with the Maricopa County Recorder. No particular
sequence of recording is required.
Location
Southeast corner of 29th Avenue and Georgia Avenue.
Council District: 5
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 466
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 210050 - Southeast Corner of 29th Avenue
and Georgia Avenue (Resolution 22040)
Abandonment: ABND 210050
Project: 99-817
Applicant: Baird Fullerton
Request: 25-foot public utility easement (PUE) abutting Lots 11 and 12 and the 16-foot
PUE abutting the east side lots 5, 6, and 7 and the west side of 16,17,18 in the Pennie
Tract subdivision recorded in Book 43, Page 51 of the Maricopa County Recorder.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Jan. 20, 2022
Summary
This abandonment is one of three being processed together to complete an
abandonment of a former alley/retained PUE. All three resolutions of abandonment
(ABND 200564, ABND 210050, and ABND 210064) should be recorded together, on
the same day, with the Maricopa County Recorder. No particular sequence of
recording is required.
Location
Southeast Corner of 29th Avenue and Georgia Avenue.
Council District: 5
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 467
Report
and Georgia Avenue (Resolution 22040)
Abandonment: ABND 210050
Project: 99-817
Applicant: Baird Fullerton
Request: 25-foot public utility easement (PUE) abutting Lots 11 and 12 and the 16-foot
PUE abutting the east side lots 5, 6, and 7 and the west side of 16,17,18 in the Pennie
Tract subdivision recorded in Book 43, Page 51 of the Maricopa County Recorder.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Jan. 20, 2022
Summary
This abandonment is one of three being processed together to complete an
abandonment of a former alley/retained PUE. All three resolutions of abandonment
(ABND 200564, ABND 210050, and ABND 210064) should be recorded together, on
the same day, with the Maricopa County Recorder. No particular sequence of
recording is required.
Location
Southeast Corner of 29th Avenue and Georgia Avenue.
Council District: 5
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 467
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 210064 - Northeast Corner of 29th Avenue
and Colter Street (Resolution 22041)
Abandonment: ABND 210064
Project: 99-817
Applicant: Baird Fullerton
Request: Eight-foot-wide Public Utility Easement north of Colter Street, north of parcel
identified by APN 153-19-034, and east to the parcel identified by 153-19-005.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Jan. 28, 2022
Summary
This abandonment is one of three being processed together to complete an
abandonment of a former alley/retained PUE. All three resolutions of abandonment
(ABND 200564, ABND 210050, and ABND 210064) should be recorded together, on
the same day, with the Maricopa County Recorder. No particular sequence of
recording is required.
Location
Northeast Corner of 29th Avenue and Colter Street.
Council District: 5
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 468
Report
and Colter Street (Resolution 22041)
Abandonment: ABND 210064
Project: 99-817
Applicant: Baird Fullerton
Request: Eight-foot-wide Public Utility Easement north of Colter Street, north of parcel
identified by APN 153-19-034, and east to the parcel identified by 153-19-005.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Jan. 28, 2022
Summary
This abandonment is one of three being processed together to complete an
abandonment of a former alley/retained PUE. All three resolutions of abandonment
(ABND 200564, ABND 210050, and ABND 210064) should be recorded together, on
the same day, with the Maricopa County Recorder. No particular sequence of
recording is required.
Location
Northeast Corner of 29th Avenue and Colter Street.
Council District: 5
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 468
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Abandonment of Alleyway - ABND 210043 - East Lincoln Drive and East
Piestewa Drive (Resolution 22039)
Abandonment: ABND 210043
Project: 21-4039
Applicant: Andrew M. May
Request: The alley located in the subdivision "Indian Hills Two," between the north side
of Lot 67 and the south sides of Lots 64, 65, and 66.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Oct. 7, 2021
Location
East Lincoln Drive and East Piestewa Peak Drive.
Council District: 6
Financial Impact
A consideration fee was also collected as part of this alleyway abandonment in the
amount of $789.50.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 469
Report
Piestewa Drive (Resolution 22039)
Abandonment: ABND 210043
Project: 21-4039
Applicant: Andrew M. May
Request: The alley located in the subdivision "Indian Hills Two," between the north side
of Lot 67 and the south sides of Lots 64, 65, and 66.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Oct. 7, 2021
Location
East Lincoln Drive and East Piestewa Peak Drive.
Council District: 6
Financial Impact
A consideration fee was also collected as part of this alleyway abandonment in the
amount of $789.50.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 469
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Abandonment of Easement - V190002A - Southeast Corner of Fillmore Street and
5th Avenue (Resolution 22038)
Abandonment: V190002A
Project: 18-615
Applicant: Stephen M. Kraner
Request: To abandon 12-foot public utility easement running north to south on parcels
bounded by APNs 111-41-178A and 111-41-178B and 5-foot sidewalk easement on 4th
Avenue along parcels APN 11-41-178A and 111-41-178B.
Date of Decision/Hearing: March 12, 2019
Location
Southeast Corner of Fillmore Street and 5th Avenue.
Council District: 7
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 470
Report
5th Avenue (Resolution 22038)
Abandonment: V190002A
Project: 18-615
Applicant: Stephen M. Kraner
Request: To abandon 12-foot public utility easement running north to south on parcels
bounded by APNs 111-41-178A and 111-41-178B and 5-foot sidewalk easement on 4th
Avenue along parcels APN 11-41-178A and 111-41-178B.
Date of Decision/Hearing: March 12, 2019
Location
Southeast Corner of Fillmore Street and 5th Avenue.
Council District: 7
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 470
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 220009 - 5734, 5730 and 5726 North 8th Place
(Resolution 22042)
Abandonment: ABND 220009
Project: 20-574
Applicant: James Williamson
Request: To abandon the 1-foot vehicular non-access easement adjacent to the east
property line of 5734, 5730, and 5726 N. 8th Place.
Date of Decision/Hearing: April 14, 2022
Location
East side of 5734, 5730, 5726 N. 8th Place.
Council District: 7
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 471
Report
(Resolution 22042)
Abandonment: ABND 220009
Project: 20-574
Applicant: James Williamson
Request: To abandon the 1-foot vehicular non-access easement adjacent to the east
property line of 5734, 5730, and 5726 N. 8th Place.
Date of Decision/Hearing: April 14, 2022
Location
East side of 5734, 5730, 5726 N. 8th Place.
Council District: 7
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 471
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Waiver of Federal Patent Easement - ABND 220022 - Southeast Corner of 19th
Avenue and Jomax Road (Resolution 22043)
Abandonment: ABND 220022
Project: 22-1201
Applicant: Dennis Newcombe, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Request: To abandon/waive the 33-foot wide federal patent easement encumbering
the north, east, and west sides of APN 210-11-014C and the east and west sides of
APN 210-11-014A.
Date of Decision/Hearing: May 21, 2022
Location
Southeast Corner of 19th Avenue and Jomax Road.
Council District: 2
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this waiver of City interest in the
easement, although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 472
Report
Avenue and Jomax Road (Resolution 22043)
Abandonment: ABND 220022
Project: 22-1201
Applicant: Dennis Newcombe, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Request: To abandon/waive the 33-foot wide federal patent easement encumbering
the north, east, and west sides of APN 210-11-014C and the east and west sides of
APN 210-11-014A.
Date of Decision/Hearing: May 21, 2022
Location
Southeast Corner of 19th Avenue and Jomax Road.
Council District: 2
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this waiver of City interest in the
easement, although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 472
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1232 (Ordinance G-6998)
Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1232. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with a portion of Z-301-81 and the entitlements are fully
vested.
Summary
To rezone a parcel located on the west side of 28th Street approximately 175 feet
south of Camelback Road
Application No.: Z-301-81-6
Zoning: C-O
Owner: 2777 LPGS JV LLC
Acreage: 1.10
Location
West side of 28th Street approximately 175 feet south of Camelback Road.
Address: 2777 E. Camelback Road.
Council District: 6
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 473
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1232.
____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as
follows:
SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is
hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1232, which
accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
_____________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
Page 474
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:_____________________________
_____________________________
REVIEWED BY:
____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
PL:tml:LF22-0712:7-1-2022
Page 475
Page 476
Report
Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1232. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with a portion of Z-301-81 and the entitlements are fully
vested.
Summary
To rezone a parcel located on the west side of 28th Street approximately 175 feet
south of Camelback Road
Application No.: Z-301-81-6
Zoning: C-O
Owner: 2777 LPGS JV LLC
Acreage: 1.10
Location
West side of 28th Street approximately 175 feet south of Camelback Road.
Address: 2777 E. Camelback Road.
Council District: 6
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 473
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1232.
____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as
follows:
SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is
hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1232, which
accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
_____________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
Page 474
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:_____________________________
_____________________________
REVIEWED BY:
____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
PL:tml:LF22-0712:7-1-2022
Page 475
Page 476
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-14-22-1 -
Northeast Corner of Black Canyon Highway and Adobe Drive (Ordinance G-7000)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 DVAO (Intermediate Commercial, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) and A-1
DVAO (Light Industrial District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to A-1 DVAO (Light
Industrial District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to allow industrial development.
Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 DVAO (4.50 acres) and A-1 DVAO (4.85 acres)
Proposed Zoning: A-1 DVAO
Acreage: 9.35 acres
Proposal: Industrial development
Owner: BDC Adobe, LLC
Applicant: Baker Development Company
Representative: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell, LLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee did not hear this case due to
not having quorum at the May 12, 2022 meeting.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Northeast corner of Black Canyon Highway and Adobe Drive.
Council District: 1
Parcel Address: 22205, 22351, 22413 N. Black Canyon Highway
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 477
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-14-22-1) FROM C-2 DVAO (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, DEER VALLEY AIRPORT OVERLAY
DISTRICT) AND A-1 DVAO (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT,
DEER VALLEY AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO A-1 DVAO
(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, DEER VALLEY AIRPORT
OVERLAY).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 9.35-acre site located on the northeast
corner of Black Canyon Highway and Adobe Drive in a portion of Section 13,
Township 4 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is
hereby changed from 4.50 acres of “C-2 DVAO” (Intermediate Commercial
District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) and 4.85 acres of “A-1 DVAO” (Light
Industrial District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District), to “A-1 DVAO” (Light
Industrial District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay).
Page 478
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An average 30-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the I-17
frontage road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2. A minimum 20-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along Adobe
Drive, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
3. All landscape improvements shall be installed with the first phase of
development.
4. The required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50% 2-inch
caliper and 50% 3-inch caliper size trees and with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree,
as approved by Planning and Development Department.
5. All uncovered employee and customer surface parking lot areas shall be
landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees and five
5-gallon shrubs per tree. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the
parking areas and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as approved by
Planning and Development Department.
6. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
7. Two outdoor employee resting areas of no less than 400 square feet shall be
provided on site. One area shall be located along the north portion of the site
and one on the south portion of the site. The employee resting areas shall not
be located within loading and truck maneuvering areas. Each required resting
area shall include a minimum of two pedestrian seating benches, constructed
of quality and durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using
minimum 2-inch caliper size, large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees and/or
architectural shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Page 479
Department.
8. The following bicycle infrastructure shall be provided and maintained, as
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
a. A minimum of 10 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through
Inverted U, artistic racks, and/or within a secure bicycle storge area. The
racks shall be located near a primary building entrance or in the central
amenity area and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of
Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K or the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
b. A bicycle repair station (fix-it station) shall be provided as an employee
amenity on site. The station shall include but is not limited to: standard
repair tools affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump; and a bicycle
repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while making
adjustments to the bike.
9. The west building elevation, visible from the I-17 frontage road that exceeds
100-feet in length shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing such
as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, window fenestration, shadow
boxes and overhead/canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
10. The sidewalk along the I-17 frontage road shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width
and detached with a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape strip located between
the sidewalk and the back of curb, planted to the following standards, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department and the
Arizona Department of Transportation.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide
sidewalk shade to a minimum of 75% at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75% live coverage at maturity.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
11. The sidewalk along Adobe Drive shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 480
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide
sidewalk shade to a minimum of 75% at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75% live coverage at maturity.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
12. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
13. The developer shall underground existing electrical utilities withing the public
right-of-way that are impacted or require relocation as part of the project. The
developer shall coordinate with affected utility companies for review and
permitting.
14. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AH, on panel
1280M of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated September 18, 2020.
The following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:
a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain boundary limits
on the Grading and Drainage plan and ensure that impacts to the
proposed facilities have been considered, following the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3). This
includes, but not limited to provisions in the latest versions of the
Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.
b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall to be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of Public Works Department for review
and approval of Floodplain requirements.
c. Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33) based on construction plans
must be received and approved by Floodplain Management prior to
issuance of Grading & Drainage permit. In Zone A, a base flood
elevation determination letter (sample letter is provided by Floodplain
Management upon request) and exhibit will also be required prior to
issuance of Grading & Drainage permit.
d. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved CLOMR-F or CLOMR
prior to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit. CLOMR-F and
Page 481
CLOMR also requires the following compliance with Section 7 & 9 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA).
15. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
16. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
17. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
18. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to
the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney.
19. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
20. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
21. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
Page 482
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 483
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-14-22-1
APN: 209-04-036A, 209-04-038A
LOT 35, AND THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 36, TOWNSITE OF ADOBE, STATE PLAT
11, ACCORDING TO BOOK 68 OF MAPS, PAGE 45, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
13, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE
AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPT 1/16 OF ALL GAS, OIL, METALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED
TO STATE OF ARIZONA IN PATENT OF SAID LAND; AND
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, BY AND
THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BY WARRANTY DEED
RECORDED APRIL 25, 2007, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20070480060.
APN: 209-04-074D
A PORTION OF LOT 1, HAUGEN INDUSTRIAL A - A ONE LOT SUBDIVISION,
RECORDED IN BOOK 681 OF MAPS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE ALUMINUM CAP FLUSH MARKING THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SECTION 13, FROM WHICH A CITY OF PHOENIX, BRASS CAP
FLUSH MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 13, BEARS SOUTH 89
DEGREES 56 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 2,657.04 FEET, SAID DESCRIBED
LINE BEING THE BASIS FOR THE BEARINGS OF THIS DESCRIPTION;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST 1,500.22 FEET
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13,
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE CENTER
OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 83 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST
23,104.32 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 01 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 28 SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
500.48 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 100.86 FEET
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Page 484
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST
363.15 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
LOT 1;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST 165.79 FEET
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS WEST 404.41 FEET TO
THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 17, AS RECORDED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 2007-839371;
THENCE NORTH 06 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST 121.67 FEET
ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 54.91 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST 45.00 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
APN: 209-04-074E
A PORTION OF LOT 1, HAUGEN INDUSTRIAL A - A ONE LOT SUBDIVISION,
RECORDED IN BOOK 681 OF MAPS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE ALUMINUM CAP FLUSH MARKING THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SECTION 13, FROM WHICH A CITY OF PHOENIX, BRASS CAP
FLUSH MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 13, BEARS SOUTH 89
DEGREES 56 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 2,657.04 FEET, SAID DESCRIBED
LINE BEING THE BASIS FOR THE BEARINGS OF THIS DESCRIPTION;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST 1,500.22 FEET
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13,
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE CENTER
OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 83 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST
23,104.32 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 01 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 28 SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
500.48 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 40.86 FEET
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1;
Page 485
THENCE SOUTH 06 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST 167.00 FEET
ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 17 AS RECORDED
IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007-839371 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 404.41 FEET TO
THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST 165.79 FEET
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS WEST 386.73
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF
WAY LINE OF SAID INTERSTATE 17 AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE TO THE LEFT THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 84 DEGREES 56
MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST 23,151.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 09
SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 34.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 06 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST 132.15 FEET
CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
APN: 209-04-040A
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 1, HAUGAN INDUSTRIAL A – A ONE SIBDIVISION,
RECORDED IN BOOK 681 OF MAPS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF MARICIOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
LOT 38 STATE PLAT 11, TOWNSITE OF ADOBE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF
RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, RECORDED IN
BOOK 68 OF MAPS, PAGE 45.
Page 486
Page 487
Report
Northeast Corner of Black Canyon Highway and Adobe Drive (Ordinance G-7000)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 DVAO (Intermediate Commercial, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) and A-1
DVAO (Light Industrial District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to A-1 DVAO (Light
Industrial District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to allow industrial development.
Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 DVAO (4.50 acres) and A-1 DVAO (4.85 acres)
Proposed Zoning: A-1 DVAO
Acreage: 9.35 acres
Proposal: Industrial development
Owner: BDC Adobe, LLC
Applicant: Baker Development Company
Representative: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell, LLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee did not hear this case due to
not having quorum at the May 12, 2022 meeting.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Northeast corner of Black Canyon Highway and Adobe Drive.
Council District: 1
Parcel Address: 22205, 22351, 22413 N. Black Canyon Highway
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 477
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-14-22-1) FROM C-2 DVAO (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, DEER VALLEY AIRPORT OVERLAY
DISTRICT) AND A-1 DVAO (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT,
DEER VALLEY AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO A-1 DVAO
(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, DEER VALLEY AIRPORT
OVERLAY).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 9.35-acre site located on the northeast
corner of Black Canyon Highway and Adobe Drive in a portion of Section 13,
Township 4 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is
hereby changed from 4.50 acres of “C-2 DVAO” (Intermediate Commercial
District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) and 4.85 acres of “A-1 DVAO” (Light
Industrial District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District), to “A-1 DVAO” (Light
Industrial District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay).
Page 478
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An average 30-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the I-17
frontage road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2. A minimum 20-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along Adobe
Drive, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
3. All landscape improvements shall be installed with the first phase of
development.
4. The required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50% 2-inch
caliper and 50% 3-inch caliper size trees and with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree,
as approved by Planning and Development Department.
5. All uncovered employee and customer surface parking lot areas shall be
landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees and five
5-gallon shrubs per tree. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the
parking areas and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as approved by
Planning and Development Department.
6. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
7. Two outdoor employee resting areas of no less than 400 square feet shall be
provided on site. One area shall be located along the north portion of the site
and one on the south portion of the site. The employee resting areas shall not
be located within loading and truck maneuvering areas. Each required resting
area shall include a minimum of two pedestrian seating benches, constructed
of quality and durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using
minimum 2-inch caliper size, large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees and/or
architectural shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Page 479
Department.
8. The following bicycle infrastructure shall be provided and maintained, as
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
a. A minimum of 10 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through
Inverted U, artistic racks, and/or within a secure bicycle storge area. The
racks shall be located near a primary building entrance or in the central
amenity area and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of
Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K or the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
b. A bicycle repair station (fix-it station) shall be provided as an employee
amenity on site. The station shall include but is not limited to: standard
repair tools affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump; and a bicycle
repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while making
adjustments to the bike.
9. The west building elevation, visible from the I-17 frontage road that exceeds
100-feet in length shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing such
as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, window fenestration, shadow
boxes and overhead/canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
10. The sidewalk along the I-17 frontage road shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width
and detached with a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape strip located between
the sidewalk and the back of curb, planted to the following standards, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department and the
Arizona Department of Transportation.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide
sidewalk shade to a minimum of 75% at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75% live coverage at maturity.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
11. The sidewalk along Adobe Drive shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 480
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide
sidewalk shade to a minimum of 75% at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75% live coverage at maturity.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
12. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
13. The developer shall underground existing electrical utilities withing the public
right-of-way that are impacted or require relocation as part of the project. The
developer shall coordinate with affected utility companies for review and
permitting.
14. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AH, on panel
1280M of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated September 18, 2020.
The following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:
a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain boundary limits
on the Grading and Drainage plan and ensure that impacts to the
proposed facilities have been considered, following the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3). This
includes, but not limited to provisions in the latest versions of the
Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.
b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall to be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of Public Works Department for review
and approval of Floodplain requirements.
c. Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33) based on construction plans
must be received and approved by Floodplain Management prior to
issuance of Grading & Drainage permit. In Zone A, a base flood
elevation determination letter (sample letter is provided by Floodplain
Management upon request) and exhibit will also be required prior to
issuance of Grading & Drainage permit.
d. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved CLOMR-F or CLOMR
prior to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit. CLOMR-F and
Page 481
CLOMR also requires the following compliance with Section 7 & 9 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA).
15. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
16. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
17. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
18. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to
the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney.
19. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
20. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
21. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
Page 482
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 483
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-14-22-1
APN: 209-04-036A, 209-04-038A
LOT 35, AND THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 36, TOWNSITE OF ADOBE, STATE PLAT
11, ACCORDING TO BOOK 68 OF MAPS, PAGE 45, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
13, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE
AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPT 1/16 OF ALL GAS, OIL, METALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED
TO STATE OF ARIZONA IN PATENT OF SAID LAND; AND
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, BY AND
THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BY WARRANTY DEED
RECORDED APRIL 25, 2007, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20070480060.
APN: 209-04-074D
A PORTION OF LOT 1, HAUGEN INDUSTRIAL A - A ONE LOT SUBDIVISION,
RECORDED IN BOOK 681 OF MAPS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE ALUMINUM CAP FLUSH MARKING THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SECTION 13, FROM WHICH A CITY OF PHOENIX, BRASS CAP
FLUSH MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 13, BEARS SOUTH 89
DEGREES 56 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 2,657.04 FEET, SAID DESCRIBED
LINE BEING THE BASIS FOR THE BEARINGS OF THIS DESCRIPTION;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST 1,500.22 FEET
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13,
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE CENTER
OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 83 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST
23,104.32 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 01 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 28 SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
500.48 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 100.86 FEET
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Page 484
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST
363.15 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
LOT 1;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST 165.79 FEET
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS WEST 404.41 FEET TO
THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 17, AS RECORDED IN
DOCUMENT NO. 2007-839371;
THENCE NORTH 06 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST 121.67 FEET
ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 54.91 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST 45.00 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
APN: 209-04-074E
A PORTION OF LOT 1, HAUGEN INDUSTRIAL A - A ONE LOT SUBDIVISION,
RECORDED IN BOOK 681 OF MAPS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE ALUMINUM CAP FLUSH MARKING THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SECTION 13, FROM WHICH A CITY OF PHOENIX, BRASS CAP
FLUSH MARKING THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 13, BEARS SOUTH 89
DEGREES 56 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 2,657.04 FEET, SAID DESCRIBED
LINE BEING THE BASIS FOR THE BEARINGS OF THIS DESCRIPTION;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST 1,500.22 FEET
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13,
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE CENTER
OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 83 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST
23,104.32 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 01 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 28 SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
500.48 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 40.86 FEET
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1;
Page 485
THENCE SOUTH 06 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST 167.00 FEET
ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 17 AS RECORDED
IN DOCUMENT NO. 2007-839371 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 404.41 FEET TO
THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST 165.79 FEET
ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 24 SECONDS WEST 386.73
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF
WAY LINE OF SAID INTERSTATE 17 AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE TO THE LEFT THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 84 DEGREES 56
MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST 23,151.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 09
SECONDS, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 34.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 06 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST 132.15 FEET
CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
APN: 209-04-040A
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 1, HAUGAN INDUSTRIAL A – A ONE SIBDIVISION,
RECORDED IN BOOK 681 OF MAPS, PAGE 37, RECORDS OF MARICIOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
LOT 38 STATE PLAT 11, TOWNSITE OF ADOBE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF
RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, RECORDED IN
BOOK 68 OF MAPS, PAGE 45.
Page 486
Page 487
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-57-21-3 (PV
PUD) - Northwest Corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road (Ordinance G-
7004)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
RSC PCD (Regional Shopping Center District, Planned Community District) and RSC
PCD (Approved C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD) (Regional Shopping Center District,
Planned Community District, Approved Intermediate Commercial District, High-Rise
and High Density District, Density Waiver, Special Permit, Planned Community District)
to PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow mixed use development.
Summary
Current Zoning: RSC PCD (15.34 acres) and RSC PCD (Approved C-2 H-R
DNS/WVR SP PCD) (64.64 acres)
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 79.98
Proposal: Mixed use development
Owner: PV Land SPE, LLC and PV JCP, LLC
Applicant: Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Representative: Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 4,
2022, for information only.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on May
2, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 13-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road.
Council District: 3
Page 488
Parcel Address: 12820 N. Tatum Blvd.; 4500, 4502, 4510, 4520, 4540, 4550, 4554,
4568, 4604, and 4610 E. Cactus Road; and 4623 E. Paradise Valley Village Parkway
North
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 489
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-57-21-3) FROM RSC PCD (REGIONAL
SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT, PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT) AND RSC PCD (APPROVED C-2 H-R DNS/WVR
SP PCD) (REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT,
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT, APPROVED
INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, HIGH-RISE AND
HIGH DENSITY DISTRICT, DENSITY WAIVER, SPECIAL
PERMIT, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT) TO PUD
(PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of 79.98-acre site located on the northwest
corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road in a portion of Section 18, Township 3
North, Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed
from 15.34 acres of “RSC PCD” (Regional Shopping Center District, Planned
Community District) and 64.64 acres of “RSC PCD (Approved C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP
PCD)” (Regional Shopping Center District, Planned Community District, Approved
Intermediate Commercial District, High-Rise and High Density District, Density
Page 490
Waiver, Special Permit, Planned Community District) to “PUD” (Planned Unit
Development).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following
stipulations, violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of
the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Paradise Valley Mall PUD reflecting
the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning
Department within 14 days of City Council approval of this request. The
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with Development
Narrative date stamped (Insert date of public hearing draft) as modified by the
following stipulations. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent
with the Development Narrative date stamped April 21, 2022 as modified by
the following stipulations:
a. Permitted use list, Page 39: Add the following standards for a self-
service storage warehouse: Storage buildings shall not exceed three
stories or 30 feet in height. Storage buildings shall be limited to an
80,000-square foot footprint, and not to exceed a 200,000-square foot
floor area.
b. Shade Standards, Page 37: Add the following language to this section: a
minimum of 25% structural or vegetative shade at maturity shall be
provided in surface parking lots.
c. Design Guidelines, Page 46: Add the following language regarding
parking garages: All newly constructed parking structures visible from
the loop road or any primary pedestrian route shall be wrapped with
other uses such as, street level retail, office space, or residential
dwelling units; or with decorative screening such as, perforated
screening, illuminated art, living greenery, decorative metal panels or
other design features.
d. Language in the Sign Section on pages 51-56 shall be replaced with the
Page 491
following: Signs within the Paradise Valley Mall PUD area will be
permitted in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Section 705 for
commercial (C-2) zoned properties and as part of an approved Master
Planned Development Sign Plan in accordance with Section 1209.B.8 of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance (Downtown Code) and the standards for
a master planned development covering a contiguous area of at least
ten acres. Off-premise signs are not permitted within the Paradise Valley
Mall PUD area per the current standards within section 705.2 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Concepts for consideration as part of a
Master Planned Development Sign Plan are included as exhibits 22-24
of the PUD.
2. Relocation and/or reconstruction of the Paradise Valley Transit Center is
subject to Planning and Development Department and Public Transit
Department Approval. A minimum of three transit vehicle servicing points shall
be constructed at any relocated or reconstructed site. All plans and designs for
relocated and/or reconstructed transit facilities shall require approval from the
Public Transit Department and the Planning and Development Department.
The Public Transit Department shall retain removable assets located at the
Paradise Valley Transit Center should relocation and/or reconstruction be
approved.
3. Vehicle access to all public transit facilities shall be ensured by dedication of
transit easements or other legal agreements, as approved by the Public Transit
Department and the Planning and Development Department.
4. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct two bus stop pads at
locations approved or modified by the Public Transit Department. The bus stop
pads shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260
with a minimum depth of 10 feet. The bus stop pads shall be spaced from
intersections according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall
be placed to provide 50% shade at bus stop pads, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
5. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped, or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
6. All cross-access agreements shall include a pedestrian pathway, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
7. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of site plans shall be granted until the
study is reviewed and approved by the City. Contact Mr. Christopher Kowalsky,
Special Projects Administrator, at (602) 534-7105, to set up a meeting to
Page 492
discuss the requirements of the study. Upon completion of the TIS the
developer shall submit the completed TIS to the Planning and Development
Department counter with instruction to forward the study to the Street
Transportation Department, City Engineers Office. Additional dedications
and/or improvements may be required as per the approved Traffic Impact
Study.
8. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
landscape median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department. All improvements
shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
9. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July,
2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
Page 493
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (9 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 494
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-57-21-3
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION
18, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE GILA & SALT RIVER
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 1
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18 FROM
WHICH THE EAST QUARTER CORNER THEREOF BEARS THENCE NORTH 01
DEGREES 22 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2618.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF 268.99 FEET TO A POINT
LYING ON THE RELOCATED MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD AS
RECORDED IN DOCKET 12020, PAGE 713, IN DOCKET 12020, PAGE 733, IN
DOCKET 12020, PAGE 747, AND IN DOCKET 12437, PAGE 582, AND
ACCORDING TO BOOK 195 OF MAPS, PAGE 30, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID
REALIGNED CACTUS ROAD MONUMENT LINE, 832.80 FEET TO A POINT LYING
ON THE MONUMENT LINE OF REALIGNED TATUM BOULEVARD ALSO BEING
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE, NORTH 69 DEGREES 52
MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 434.67 FEET TO A POINT TO
BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN AS POINT “A”;
THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 67.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 145.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 163.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF
WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 13 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 11
SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 580.25 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 28 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
233.85 FEET;
Page 495
THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 165.90 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 147.65 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 57.35 FEET TO THE MONUMENT LINE OF TATUM BOULEVARD;
THENCE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
MONUMENT LINE OF TATUM BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 440.00 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 207,157 SQUARE FEET OR 4.756 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.
PARCEL 2
COMMENCING AT AFOREMENTIONED POINT “A”
THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 285.30 FEET TO A
POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,291.83 FEET
AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 28 SECONDS;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD,
WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 372.32 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD,
WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02
DEGREES 49 MINUTES 26 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 112.96 FEET TO A
POINT TO BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN AS POINT “C”;
THENCE NORTH 08 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST, DEPARTING
SAID MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO
THE POINT OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE
RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 51 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, A
RADIAL DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 54 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
13.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 162.14 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
Page 496
OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 19
SECONDS;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE
OF 39.89 FEET TO A COMPOUND CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 2,551.83 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12 DEGREES 03
MINUTES 37 SECONDS;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
537.14 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING
A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91 DEGREES 03
MINUTES 49 SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE
OF 31.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 47 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 68.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
TO THE RIGHT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 04 DEGREES 41
MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 2,887.66 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 17 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 186.71
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 03 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 447.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 317.37 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 56.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 199.00 FEET TO A POINT TO BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN AS POINT “B”;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 21 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
335.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 97.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 33 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 71.86 FEET;
Page 497
THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 332.45 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 140.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE WEST, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 13 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 44
SECONDS EAST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 163.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS
OF 327.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28 DEGREES 58 MINUTES
07 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 165.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 32.58 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
MONUMENT LINE OF PARADISE VILLAGE PARKWAY;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID
MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 31.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, DEPARTING
SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE
RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 51 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST, A
RADIAL DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 25 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
13.60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 20.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 354.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 01
SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 83.92
FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 30.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 01
SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
48.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO
THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 10 DEGREES 53
MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 700.00 FEET;
Page 498
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 11 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 54 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 144.55
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 188.95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 167.00 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID
MONUMENT LINE OF PARADISE VILLAGE PARKWAY;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID
MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1,322.59 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, DEPARTING
SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 177.52 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 37 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 100.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 59 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 224.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
TO THE RIGHT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 59 DEGREES 07
MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 349.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 42 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
156.84 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 85 DEGREES 30 MINUTES
57 SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
29.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 133.21 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 327.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 DEGREES 02
MINUTES 53 SECONDS;
Page 499
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 97.45
FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 30.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 27
SECONDS;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 24.33
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 67.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE MONUMENT LINE OF TATUM BOULEVARD
AND THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT,
OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 71 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 17
SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 1,637.02 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE AND ALONG THE ARC
OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 DEGREE 22 MINUTES
12 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 39.15 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST, CONTINUING
ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 37.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, DEPARTING
SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE
RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 68 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, A
RADIAL DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 03 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
26.87 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 273.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 DEGREES 19
MINUTES 25 SECONDS;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 87.31
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 137.44 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 20.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 79 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 09
SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF
27.85 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 350.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04 DEGREES 59
MINUTES 09 SECONDS;
Page 500
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
30.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 14 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 429.34 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 20.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 28
SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 20.54
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 862.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 132.15 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 06 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 6.94 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 48.59 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 73 DEGREES 00
MINUTE 24 SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 21 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
25.08 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 26 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 51.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 23 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 509.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE SOUTH, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 73 DEGREES 06 MINUTES
58 SECONDS WEST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 23.19 FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS
OF 180.98 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07 DEGREES 20 MINUTES
50 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 23.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 320.60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 193.00 FEET;
Page 501
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 10 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 67.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 2,359,420 SQUARE FEET OR 54.165 ACRES, MORE
OR LESS.
PARCEL 3
BEGINNING AT AFOREMENTIONED POINT “B”
THENCE SOUTH 48 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 304.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 209.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 55 DEGREES 42
MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 620.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 02 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
110.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 164.85 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 63.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 21 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
139.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 81.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 21 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
111.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 33,121 SQUARE FEET OR 0.760 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Page 502
PARCEL 4
COMMENCING AT AFOREMENTIONED POINT “C”, SAID POINT BEING THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, OF WHICH THE RADIUS
POINT LIES SOUTH 08 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD AND
ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 2,291.83 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 31 SECONDS, A
DISTANCE OF 717.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL
HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE CONTINUING WESTERLY ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE AND ALONG
SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,291.83 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 08 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 11 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 328.13
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, DEPARTING
SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 67.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 428.41 FEET TO THE POINT OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE NORTH, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 67 DEGREES 40 MINUTES
26 SECONDS EAST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 141.65 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS
OF 540.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 DEGREES 04 MINUTES
24 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 142.06 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 34 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 68.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 09 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 200.00 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 09 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 82,970 SQUARE FEET OR 1.905 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.
Page 503
Page 504
Report
PUD) - Northwest Corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road (Ordinance G-
7004)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
RSC PCD (Regional Shopping Center District, Planned Community District) and RSC
PCD (Approved C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD) (Regional Shopping Center District,
Planned Community District, Approved Intermediate Commercial District, High-Rise
and High Density District, Density Waiver, Special Permit, Planned Community District)
to PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow mixed use development.
Summary
Current Zoning: RSC PCD (15.34 acres) and RSC PCD (Approved C-2 H-R
DNS/WVR SP PCD) (64.64 acres)
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 79.98
Proposal: Mixed use development
Owner: PV Land SPE, LLC and PV JCP, LLC
Applicant: Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Representative: Ed Bull, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 4,
2022, for information only.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on May
2, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 13-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Northwest corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road.
Council District: 3
Page 488
Parcel Address: 12820 N. Tatum Blvd.; 4500, 4502, 4510, 4520, 4540, 4550, 4554,
4568, 4604, and 4610 E. Cactus Road; and 4623 E. Paradise Valley Village Parkway
North
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 489
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-57-21-3) FROM RSC PCD (REGIONAL
SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT, PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT) AND RSC PCD (APPROVED C-2 H-R DNS/WVR
SP PCD) (REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT,
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT, APPROVED
INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, HIGH-RISE AND
HIGH DENSITY DISTRICT, DENSITY WAIVER, SPECIAL
PERMIT, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT) TO PUD
(PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of 79.98-acre site located on the northwest
corner of Tatum Boulevard and Cactus Road in a portion of Section 18, Township 3
North, Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed
from 15.34 acres of “RSC PCD” (Regional Shopping Center District, Planned
Community District) and 64.64 acres of “RSC PCD (Approved C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP
PCD)” (Regional Shopping Center District, Planned Community District, Approved
Intermediate Commercial District, High-Rise and High Density District, Density
Page 490
Waiver, Special Permit, Planned Community District) to “PUD” (Planned Unit
Development).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following
stipulations, violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of
the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Paradise Valley Mall PUD reflecting
the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning
Department within 14 days of City Council approval of this request. The
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with Development
Narrative date stamped (Insert date of public hearing draft) as modified by the
following stipulations. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent
with the Development Narrative date stamped April 21, 2022 as modified by
the following stipulations:
a. Permitted use list, Page 39: Add the following standards for a self-
service storage warehouse: Storage buildings shall not exceed three
stories or 30 feet in height. Storage buildings shall be limited to an
80,000-square foot footprint, and not to exceed a 200,000-square foot
floor area.
b. Shade Standards, Page 37: Add the following language to this section: a
minimum of 25% structural or vegetative shade at maturity shall be
provided in surface parking lots.
c. Design Guidelines, Page 46: Add the following language regarding
parking garages: All newly constructed parking structures visible from
the loop road or any primary pedestrian route shall be wrapped with
other uses such as, street level retail, office space, or residential
dwelling units; or with decorative screening such as, perforated
screening, illuminated art, living greenery, decorative metal panels or
other design features.
d. Language in the Sign Section on pages 51-56 shall be replaced with the
Page 491
following: Signs within the Paradise Valley Mall PUD area will be
permitted in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Section 705 for
commercial (C-2) zoned properties and as part of an approved Master
Planned Development Sign Plan in accordance with Section 1209.B.8 of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance (Downtown Code) and the standards for
a master planned development covering a contiguous area of at least
ten acres. Off-premise signs are not permitted within the Paradise Valley
Mall PUD area per the current standards within section 705.2 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Concepts for consideration as part of a
Master Planned Development Sign Plan are included as exhibits 22-24
of the PUD.
2. Relocation and/or reconstruction of the Paradise Valley Transit Center is
subject to Planning and Development Department and Public Transit
Department Approval. A minimum of three transit vehicle servicing points shall
be constructed at any relocated or reconstructed site. All plans and designs for
relocated and/or reconstructed transit facilities shall require approval from the
Public Transit Department and the Planning and Development Department.
The Public Transit Department shall retain removable assets located at the
Paradise Valley Transit Center should relocation and/or reconstruction be
approved.
3. Vehicle access to all public transit facilities shall be ensured by dedication of
transit easements or other legal agreements, as approved by the Public Transit
Department and the Planning and Development Department.
4. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct two bus stop pads at
locations approved or modified by the Public Transit Department. The bus stop
pads shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260
with a minimum depth of 10 feet. The bus stop pads shall be spaced from
intersections according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall
be placed to provide 50% shade at bus stop pads, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
5. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped, or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
6. All cross-access agreements shall include a pedestrian pathway, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
7. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of site plans shall be granted until the
study is reviewed and approved by the City. Contact Mr. Christopher Kowalsky,
Special Projects Administrator, at (602) 534-7105, to set up a meeting to
Page 492
discuss the requirements of the study. Upon completion of the TIS the
developer shall submit the completed TIS to the Planning and Development
Department counter with instruction to forward the study to the Street
Transportation Department, City Engineers Office. Additional dedications
and/or improvements may be required as per the approved Traffic Impact
Study.
8. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
landscape median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department. All improvements
shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
9. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July,
2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
Page 493
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (9 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 494
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-57-21-3
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION
18, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE GILA & SALT RIVER
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 1
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18 FROM
WHICH THE EAST QUARTER CORNER THEREOF BEARS THENCE NORTH 01
DEGREES 22 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2618.84 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF 268.99 FEET TO A POINT
LYING ON THE RELOCATED MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD AS
RECORDED IN DOCKET 12020, PAGE 713, IN DOCKET 12020, PAGE 733, IN
DOCKET 12020, PAGE 747, AND IN DOCKET 12437, PAGE 582, AND
ACCORDING TO BOOK 195 OF MAPS, PAGE 30, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID
REALIGNED CACTUS ROAD MONUMENT LINE, 832.80 FEET TO A POINT LYING
ON THE MONUMENT LINE OF REALIGNED TATUM BOULEVARD ALSO BEING
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE, NORTH 69 DEGREES 52
MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 434.67 FEET TO A POINT TO
BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN AS POINT “A”;
THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 67.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 145.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 163.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF
WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 13 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 11
SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 580.25 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 28 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
233.85 FEET;
Page 495
THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 165.90 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 147.65 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 57.35 FEET TO THE MONUMENT LINE OF TATUM BOULEVARD;
THENCE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
MONUMENT LINE OF TATUM BOULEVARD, A DISTANCE OF 440.00 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 207,157 SQUARE FEET OR 4.756 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.
PARCEL 2
COMMENCING AT AFOREMENTIONED POINT “A”
THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 285.30 FEET TO A
POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,291.83 FEET
AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 28 SECONDS;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD,
WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 372.32 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD,
WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02
DEGREES 49 MINUTES 26 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 112.96 FEET TO A
POINT TO BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN AS POINT “C”;
THENCE NORTH 08 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST, DEPARTING
SAID MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO
THE POINT OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE
RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 51 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, A
RADIAL DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 54 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
13.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 162.14 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
Page 496
OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 19
SECONDS;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE
OF 39.89 FEET TO A COMPOUND CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 2,551.83 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12 DEGREES 03
MINUTES 37 SECONDS;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
537.14 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING
A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91 DEGREES 03
MINUTES 49 SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE
OF 31.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 05 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 47 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 68.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
TO THE RIGHT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 04 DEGREES 41
MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 2,887.66 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 03 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 17 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 186.71
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 03 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 447.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 317.37 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 56.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 199.00 FEET TO A POINT TO BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN AS POINT “B”;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 21 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
335.10 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 97.18 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 33 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 71.86 FEET;
Page 497
THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 332.45 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 140.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE WEST, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 13 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 44
SECONDS EAST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 163.58 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS
OF 327.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28 DEGREES 58 MINUTES
07 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 165.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 32.58 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
MONUMENT LINE OF PARADISE VILLAGE PARKWAY;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID
MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 31.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, DEPARTING
SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE
RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 51 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST, A
RADIAL DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 25 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
13.60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 20.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 354.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 01
SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 83.92
FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 30.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 91 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 01
SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
48.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO
THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 10 DEGREES 53
MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 700.00 FEET;
Page 498
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 11 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 54 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 144.55
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 188.95 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 167.00 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID
MONUMENT LINE OF PARADISE VILLAGE PARKWAY;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID
MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1,322.59 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, DEPARTING
SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 177.52 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 37 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 100.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 59 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 224.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
TO THE RIGHT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 59 DEGREES 07
MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 349.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 42 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
156.84 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 85 DEGREES 30 MINUTES
57 SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
29.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 133.21 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 327.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 DEGREES 02
MINUTES 53 SECONDS;
Page 499
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 97.45
FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 30.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 27
SECONDS;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 24.33
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 67.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE MONUMENT LINE OF TATUM BOULEVARD
AND THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT,
OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 71 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 17
SECONDS WEST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 1,637.02 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE AND ALONG THE ARC
OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 DEGREE 22 MINUTES
12 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 39.15 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST, CONTINUING
ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 37.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, DEPARTING
SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE
RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 68 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, A
RADIAL DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 03 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
26.87 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 273.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 DEGREES 19
MINUTES 25 SECONDS;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 87.31
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 137.44 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 20.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 79 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 09
SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF
27.85 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 350.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04 DEGREES 59
MINUTES 09 SECONDS;
Page 500
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF
30.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 14 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 429.34 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 20.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 28
SECONDS;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 20.54
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 86 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 862.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 132.15 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 06 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 6.94 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 48.59 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES NORTH 73 DEGREES 00
MINUTE 24 SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 21 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
25.08 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 26 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 51.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 23 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 509.80 FEET TO THE POINT OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE SOUTH, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 73 DEGREES 06 MINUTES
58 SECONDS WEST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 23.19 FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS
OF 180.98 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07 DEGREES 20 MINUTES
50 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 23.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 320.60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 193.00 FEET;
Page 501
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 10 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 67.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 2,359,420 SQUARE FEET OR 54.165 ACRES, MORE
OR LESS.
PARCEL 3
BEGINNING AT AFOREMENTIONED POINT “B”
THENCE SOUTH 48 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 304.48 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 209.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE
TO THE LEFT, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 55 DEGREES 42
MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 620.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 02 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
110.74 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 24 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 164.85 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 63.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 21 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
139.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 48 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 81.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 21 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
111.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 33,121 SQUARE FEET OR 0.760 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Page 502
PARCEL 4
COMMENCING AT AFOREMENTIONED POINT “C”, SAID POINT BEING THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, OF WHICH THE RADIUS
POINT LIES SOUTH 08 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE MONUMENT LINE OF CACTUS ROAD AND
ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 2,291.83 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 31 SECONDS, A
DISTANCE OF 717.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL
HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE CONTINUING WESTERLY ALONG SAID MONUMENT LINE AND ALONG
SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,291.83 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 08 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 11 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 328.13
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, DEPARTING
SAID MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 67.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 428.41 FEET TO THE POINT OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO
THE NORTH, WITH A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 67 DEGREES 40 MINUTES
26 SECONDS EAST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 141.65 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS
OF 540.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 DEGREES 04 MINUTES
24 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 142.06 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 34 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 68.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 09 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 200.00 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 09 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 82,970 SQUARE FEET OR 1.905 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.
Page 503
Page 504
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-7-22-3 -
Approximately 190 Feet West of the Northwest Corner of 22nd Street and
Paradise Lane (Ordinance G-7003)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to R1-8 (Single-Family Residence District) to allow
single-family residential.
Summary
Current Zoning: S-1
Proposed Zoning: R1-8
Acreage: 1.10 acres
Proposal: Single-family residential
Owner: Novica Bosnjak
Applicant: Dejan Bosnjak
Representative: Edmir Dzudza
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on May
2, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 13-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 190 feet west of the northwest corner of 22nd Street and Paradise
Lane.
Council District: 3
Parcel Address: 2136 E. Paradise Lane.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 505
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-7-22-3) FROM S-1 (R ANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE) TO R1-8 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.10 acre property located approximately
190 feet west of the northwest corner of 22nd Street and Paradise Lane in a portion of
Section 3, Township 3 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit
“A,” is hereby changed from “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence) to “R1-8” (Single-Family
Residence District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
Page 506
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped March 1, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
2. A minimum building setback of 40 feet shall be required adjacent to Paradise
Lane, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
3. A minimum of two, 2-inch caliper shade trees shall be planted on each lot in
close proximity to the sidewalk to provide shade on the sidewalk, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
4. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
5. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
6. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
7. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to
the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney.
8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for
the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
9. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
Page 507
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 508
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-7-22-3
PER DEED 2021-0326773 MCR
THAT PARCEL OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3, BEING POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER FROM WHICH OF SOUTHWEST CIRNER
THEREOF BEARS WEST 1320.62 FEET,
THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER 187.00
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE NORTH 163.75 FEET,
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FROM WHICH THE
NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF BEARS 159.37 FEET,
THENCE WEST 159.37 FEET TO SAID NORTHWEST CORNER,
THENCE SOUTH 325.44 FEET OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST
QUARTER,
THENCE EAST 143.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET.
PARCEL NUMBER: 214-24-013E
Page 509
Page 510
Report
Approximately 190 Feet West of the Northwest Corner of 22nd Street and
Paradise Lane (Ordinance G-7003)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to R1-8 (Single-Family Residence District) to allow
single-family residential.
Summary
Current Zoning: S-1
Proposed Zoning: R1-8
Acreage: 1.10 acres
Proposal: Single-family residential
Owner: Novica Bosnjak
Applicant: Dejan Bosnjak
Representative: Edmir Dzudza
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on May
2, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 13-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 190 feet west of the northwest corner of 22nd Street and Paradise
Lane.
Council District: 3
Parcel Address: 2136 E. Paradise Lane.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 505
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-7-22-3) FROM S-1 (R ANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE) TO R1-8 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.10 acre property located approximately
190 feet west of the northwest corner of 22nd Street and Paradise Lane in a portion of
Section 3, Township 3 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit
“A,” is hereby changed from “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence) to “R1-8” (Single-Family
Residence District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
Page 506
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped March 1, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
2. A minimum building setback of 40 feet shall be required adjacent to Paradise
Lane, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
3. A minimum of two, 2-inch caliper shade trees shall be planted on each lot in
close proximity to the sidewalk to provide shade on the sidewalk, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
4. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
5. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
6. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
7. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to
the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney.
8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for
the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
9. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
Page 507
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 508
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-7-22-3
PER DEED 2021-0326773 MCR
THAT PARCEL OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3, BEING POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER FROM WHICH OF SOUTHWEST CIRNER
THEREOF BEARS WEST 1320.62 FEET,
THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER 187.00
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE NORTH 163.75 FEET,
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FROM WHICH THE
NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF BEARS 159.37 FEET,
THENCE WEST 159.37 FEET TO SAID NORTHWEST CORNER,
THENCE SOUTH 325.44 FEET OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST
QUARTER,
THENCE EAST 143.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET.
PARCEL NUMBER: 214-24-013E
Page 509
Page 510
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-10-22-4 -
Approximately 400 Feet East of the Southeast Corner of Central Avenue and
Roanoke Avenue (Ordinance G-7002)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R-4 HRI TOD-1 (Multifamily Residence District, High Rise Incentive District, Interim
Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One) and P-1 TOD-1 (Passenger Automobile
Parking, Limited, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One) to WU Code
T5:7 MT (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 5:7, Transit Midtown Character Area) and P-
1 TOD-1 (Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning
Overlay District One) to allow offices, storage and maintenance facility accessory to a
larger corporate campus.
Summary
Current Zoning: R-4 HRI TOD-1 (1.10 acres) and P-1 TOD-1 (0.06 acres)
Proposed Zoning: WU Code T5:7 MT (0.54 acres) and P-1 TOD-1 (0.62 acres)
Acreage: 1.16
Proposal: Offices, storage and maintenance facility accessory to a larger corporate
campus
Owner: Oxford Life Insurance Company
Applicant: Philip A. Carhuff, Architect
Representative: Nicole Hosking, Oxford Life Insurance Company
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 2, 2022,
and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 10-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Encanto Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 400 feet east of the southeast corner of Central Avenue and Roanoke
Avenue.
Page 511
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 35 and 37 E. Roanoke Ave.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 512
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (Z-10-22-4) FROM R-4 HRI TOD-1 (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, HIGH-RISE INCENTIVE DISTRICT,
INTERIM TRANSIT-ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT
ONE) AND P-1 TOD-1 (PASSENGER AUTOMOTIVE PARKING –
LIMITED, INTERIM TRANSIT-ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY
DISTRICT ONE) TO WU CODE T5:7 MT (WALKABLE URBAN
CODE, TRANSECT 5:7 DISTRICT, TRANSIT MIDTOWN
CHARACTER AREA) AND P-1 TOD-1 (PASSENGER
AUTOMOTIVE PARKING – LIMITED, INTERIM TRANSIT-
ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT ONE).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.16-acre site located approximately 400 feet
east of the southeast corner of Central Avenue and Roanoke Avenue, in a portion of
Section 32, Township 2 North, and Range 3 East, as described more specifically in
Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from 1.10-acres of “R-4 HRI TOD-1” (Multifamily
Residence District, High-Rise Incentive District, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay
District One) and 0.06-acres of “P-1 TOD-1” (Passenger Automotive Parking – Limited,
Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One), to 0.54-acres of “WU Code T5:7
MT” (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 5:7 District, Transit Midtown Character Area) and
Page 513
0.62-acres of “P-1 TOD-1” (Passenger Automotive Parking – Limited, Interim Transit-
Oriented Zoning Overlay District One).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The sidewalk along Roanoke Avenue shall be shaded and detached in
compliance with applicable provisions of the Walkable Urban Code and
designed to replicate streetscape improvements east of the subject site with
specific regard to sidewalk width, meander, materials, and landscape palette,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
A minimum 30-foot landscape setback shall be provided along Roanoke
2. Avenue, excluding the width of one drive-aisle, and planted with minimum 3-
inch caliper shade trees, placed 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
and with trees situated to provide shade on the public sidewalk, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
3. The developer shall provide an east-west pedestrian thoroughfare across the
subject site at the location depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan date
stamped April 14, 2022 and improved to the following specifications, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
a. With the exception of drive-aisle crossings, the pedestrian
thoroughfare shall be shaded to 75 percent by shade trees with a
minimum 3-inch caliper.
b. The pedestrian thoroughfare shall be separated from vehicular parking
and circulation areas by five-foot landscape area(s) planted with
shrubs and shade trees.
c. The pedestrian thoroughfare shall be illuminated by pedestrian scale
light fixtures.
d. Where the pedestrian thoroughfare crosses drive-aisles, the crossing
shall visually contrast with parking and drive aisle surfaces.
Page 514
4. The developer shall provide secure bicycle parking for six bicycles and
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction,
the developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a
33-foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time
for the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
7. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
8. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
9. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
Page 515
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeff Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 516
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-10-22-4
LEGAL DESCRIPTION for PARCEL 10 (118-44-050 and 118-44-051) TO BE
REZONED FROM R-4 TO P-1
A PORTION OF LAND LOCATED IN NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST
ROANOKE AVENUE AND NORTH THIRD STREET, FROM WHICH A BRASS CAP
FLUSH AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST THOMAS ROAD AND NORTH THIRD
STREET BEARS NORTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 1,319.30 FEET;
THENCE ALONG SAID EAST ROANOKE AVENUE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 32
MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, 760.57 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST ROANOKE AVENUE, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 27
MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST, 30.00 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING:
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 221.29 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST, 106.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, 221.79 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 106.98 FEET, TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PORTION OF LAND CONTAINING 23,700 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.5441 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, AND BEING SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS,
AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS OF RECORD OR OTHERWISE.
THIS DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON IS NOT TO BE USED TO VIOLATE
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE STATE, COUNTY AND/OR MUNICIPALITY,
OR ANY OTHER LAND DIVISION RESTRICTIONS.
Page 517
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: 118-44-090D TO BE REZONED FROM R-
4 TO WU CODE T5:7
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST
OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32 FROM
WHICH THE CENTER OF SECTION BEARS AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS SOUTH
00°10’07” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2638.37 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°10’07” WEST, ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH MID-SECTION
LINE, A DISTANCE OF 765.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°49’09” EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 459.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89°49’09” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 190.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°10’07” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 122.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°36’21” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 190.28 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°10’07” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 122.16 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Page 518
Page 519
Report
Approximately 400 Feet East of the Southeast Corner of Central Avenue and
Roanoke Avenue (Ordinance G-7002)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R-4 HRI TOD-1 (Multifamily Residence District, High Rise Incentive District, Interim
Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One) and P-1 TOD-1 (Passenger Automobile
Parking, Limited, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One) to WU Code
T5:7 MT (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 5:7, Transit Midtown Character Area) and P-
1 TOD-1 (Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning
Overlay District One) to allow offices, storage and maintenance facility accessory to a
larger corporate campus.
Summary
Current Zoning: R-4 HRI TOD-1 (1.10 acres) and P-1 TOD-1 (0.06 acres)
Proposed Zoning: WU Code T5:7 MT (0.54 acres) and P-1 TOD-1 (0.62 acres)
Acreage: 1.16
Proposal: Offices, storage and maintenance facility accessory to a larger corporate
campus
Owner: Oxford Life Insurance Company
Applicant: Philip A. Carhuff, Architect
Representative: Nicole Hosking, Oxford Life Insurance Company
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 2, 2022,
and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 10-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Encanto Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 400 feet east of the southeast corner of Central Avenue and Roanoke
Avenue.
Page 511
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 35 and 37 E. Roanoke Ave.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 512
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (Z-10-22-4) FROM R-4 HRI TOD-1 (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, HIGH-RISE INCENTIVE DISTRICT,
INTERIM TRANSIT-ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT
ONE) AND P-1 TOD-1 (PASSENGER AUTOMOTIVE PARKING –
LIMITED, INTERIM TRANSIT-ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY
DISTRICT ONE) TO WU CODE T5:7 MT (WALKABLE URBAN
CODE, TRANSECT 5:7 DISTRICT, TRANSIT MIDTOWN
CHARACTER AREA) AND P-1 TOD-1 (PASSENGER
AUTOMOTIVE PARKING – LIMITED, INTERIM TRANSIT-
ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT ONE).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.16-acre site located approximately 400 feet
east of the southeast corner of Central Avenue and Roanoke Avenue, in a portion of
Section 32, Township 2 North, and Range 3 East, as described more specifically in
Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from 1.10-acres of “R-4 HRI TOD-1” (Multifamily
Residence District, High-Rise Incentive District, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay
District One) and 0.06-acres of “P-1 TOD-1” (Passenger Automotive Parking – Limited,
Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One), to 0.54-acres of “WU Code T5:7
MT” (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 5:7 District, Transit Midtown Character Area) and
Page 513
0.62-acres of “P-1 TOD-1” (Passenger Automotive Parking – Limited, Interim Transit-
Oriented Zoning Overlay District One).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The sidewalk along Roanoke Avenue shall be shaded and detached in
compliance with applicable provisions of the Walkable Urban Code and
designed to replicate streetscape improvements east of the subject site with
specific regard to sidewalk width, meander, materials, and landscape palette,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
A minimum 30-foot landscape setback shall be provided along Roanoke
2. Avenue, excluding the width of one drive-aisle, and planted with minimum 3-
inch caliper shade trees, placed 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
and with trees situated to provide shade on the public sidewalk, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
3. The developer shall provide an east-west pedestrian thoroughfare across the
subject site at the location depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan date
stamped April 14, 2022 and improved to the following specifications, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
a. With the exception of drive-aisle crossings, the pedestrian
thoroughfare shall be shaded to 75 percent by shade trees with a
minimum 3-inch caliper.
b. The pedestrian thoroughfare shall be separated from vehicular parking
and circulation areas by five-foot landscape area(s) planted with
shrubs and shade trees.
c. The pedestrian thoroughfare shall be illuminated by pedestrian scale
light fixtures.
d. Where the pedestrian thoroughfare crosses drive-aisles, the crossing
shall visually contrast with parking and drive aisle surfaces.
Page 514
4. The developer shall provide secure bicycle parking for six bicycles and
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction,
the developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a
33-foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time
for the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
7. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
8. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
9. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
Page 515
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeff Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 516
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-10-22-4
LEGAL DESCRIPTION for PARCEL 10 (118-44-050 and 118-44-051) TO BE
REZONED FROM R-4 TO P-1
A PORTION OF LAND LOCATED IN NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST
ROANOKE AVENUE AND NORTH THIRD STREET, FROM WHICH A BRASS CAP
FLUSH AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST THOMAS ROAD AND NORTH THIRD
STREET BEARS NORTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 1,319.30 FEET;
THENCE ALONG SAID EAST ROANOKE AVENUE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 32
MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, 760.57 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST ROANOKE AVENUE, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 27
MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST, 30.00 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING:
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 221.29 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST, 106.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, 221.79 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 106.98 FEET, TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PORTION OF LAND CONTAINING 23,700 SQUARE FEET, OR 0.5441 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, AND BEING SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS,
AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS OF RECORD OR OTHERWISE.
THIS DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON IS NOT TO BE USED TO VIOLATE
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE STATE, COUNTY AND/OR MUNICIPALITY,
OR ANY OTHER LAND DIVISION RESTRICTIONS.
Page 517
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: 118-44-090D TO BE REZONED FROM R-
4 TO WU CODE T5:7
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST
OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA.
COMMENCING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32 FROM
WHICH THE CENTER OF SECTION BEARS AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS SOUTH
00°10’07” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2638.37 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°10’07” WEST, ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH MID-SECTION
LINE, A DISTANCE OF 765.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°49’09” EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 459.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89°49’09” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 190.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°10’07” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 122.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°36’21” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 190.28 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°10’07” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 122.16 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Page 518
Page 519
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-11-22-5 -
Northeast Corner of 107th Avenue and Missouri Avenue (Ordinance G-7001)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District) to R1-18 (Single-Family Residence District)
to allow single-family residential.
Summary
Current Zoning: RE-35
Proposed Zoning: R1-18
Acreage: 20.16 acres
Proposal: Single-family residential
Owner: MPAAL, LLC
Applicant: Lou Turner, Hillstone Homes
Representative: David Maguire, Land Solutions Inc.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 11,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with a deleted
stipulation, by a vote of 5-1-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Maryvale Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Northeast corner of 107th Avenue and Missouri Avenue.
Council District: 5
Parcel Address: None
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 520
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE
FINAL, ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE
ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL
DESCRIBED HEREIN (CASE Z-11-22-5) FROM RE-35
(SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R1-18
(SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 20.16-acre site located on the northeast
corner of 107th Avenue and Missouri Avenue in a portion of Section 17, Township 2
North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby
changed from “RE-35” (Single-Family Residence District), to “R1-18” (Single-Family
Residence District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following
Page 521
stipulations, violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of
the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the conceptual site
plan date stamped February 22, 2022, as modified by the following
stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2. All lots in the development shall be subject to Single-Family Design
Review.
3. The maximum building height shall be 21 feet.
4. The landscape setback along 107th Avenue and Missouri Avenue shall be
planted with a minimum 75% 2-inch caliper trees and minimum 25% 3-inch
caliper or multi-trunk trees, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department
5. A minimum of 10% percent of the gross site area shall be retained as
common area, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
6. The common open space area shall provide a minimum of 3 active
recreational elements, such as, but not limited to, playground sets, ramadas,
or a barbeque area, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
7. All sidewalks shall be detached with a minimum 5-foot-wide landscaped strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb and shall include minimum 2-
inch caliper single-trunk shade trees, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
8. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved
by the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall
comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
9. The developer shall dedicate 40-feet of right-of-way and construct the east
side of 107th Avenue, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.
10. The developer shall dedicate minimum 30-feet of right-of-way and construct
the north side of Missouri Avenue, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
11. The developer shall underground existing electrical utilities within the public
right-of-way that are impacted or those that require relocation as part of the
Page 522
project. The developer shall be responsible for coordinating with affected
utilities for review and permitting.
12. The developer shall underground all existing irrigation facilities along 107th
Avenue outside of City of Phoenix right-of-way. The developer shall contact
SRP to identify existing land rights and establish the appropriate process to
relocate facility. Relocations that require additional dedications or land
transfer require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review
approval.
13. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record
documents that disclose to purchasers of property within the
development(s) the existence and operational characteristics of nearby
existing ranchettes and animal privilege private properties that may cause
adverse noise, odors, dust, and other externalities The form and content
of such documents shall be according to the templates and instructions
provided which have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
The disclosures shall be noted in the CC&Rs in a section titled
“nuisances”.
14. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for proposed
development for the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to Planning and Development Department’s
preliminary plat approval.
15. The developer shall dedicate to the City of Phoenix an avigation easement
for the site, per the form and content prescribed by the City Attorney, prior to
Planning and Development Department preliminary plat approval. The
developer shall also dedicate and record an avigation easement in favor of
the City of Glendale in the form submitted to the City of Phoenix. The
avigation easements shall be noted in the CC&Rs in a section titled “airport
nuisances”.
16. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Glendale Airport to future owners and tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to
the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney, and in accordance with State law requiring
airport disclosure.
17. The developer’s engineer of record shall certify and note on the preliminary
and final plats as well as relevant construction drawings that the proposed
residential construction shall achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45
decibels (DNL).
18. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant
shall conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey
Page 523
report of the development area for review and approval by the City
Archaeologist prior to clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or
grading approval.
19. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
20. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction,
the developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a
33-foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time
for the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
21. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by
the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July,
2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
Page 524
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 525
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-11-22-5
PARCEL NO. 1: The East 258.00 feet of the South half of the Southwest quarter of
the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 2 North, Range 1 East of the Gila
and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona.
PARCEL NO. 2: The West 258.00 feet of the East 516.00 feet of the South half of
the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 2 North,
Range 1 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County,
Arizona.
PARCEL NO. 3: The West 258.00 feet of the East 774.00 feet of the South half of
the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 2 North,
Range 1 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County,
Arizona.
PARCEL NO. 4: The West 258 00 feet of the East 1032.00 feet of the South half of
the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 2 North,
Range 1 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County,
Arizona.
PARCEL NO. 5: The South half of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 17, Township 2 North, Range 1 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona; EXCEPT the East 1032.00 feet thereof; and
EXCEPT the West 33.00 feet.
Page 526
Page 527
Report
Northeast Corner of 107th Avenue and Missouri Avenue (Ordinance G-7001)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District) to R1-18 (Single-Family Residence District)
to allow single-family residential.
Summary
Current Zoning: RE-35
Proposed Zoning: R1-18
Acreage: 20.16 acres
Proposal: Single-family residential
Owner: MPAAL, LLC
Applicant: Lou Turner, Hillstone Homes
Representative: David Maguire, Land Solutions Inc.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 11,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with a deleted
stipulation, by a vote of 5-1-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Maryvale Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Northeast corner of 107th Avenue and Missouri Avenue.
Council District: 5
Parcel Address: None
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 520
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE
FINAL, ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE
ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL
DESCRIBED HEREIN (CASE Z-11-22-5) FROM RE-35
(SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R1-18
(SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 20.16-acre site located on the northeast
corner of 107th Avenue and Missouri Avenue in a portion of Section 17, Township 2
North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby
changed from “RE-35” (Single-Family Residence District), to “R1-18” (Single-Family
Residence District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following
Page 521
stipulations, violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of
the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the conceptual site
plan date stamped February 22, 2022, as modified by the following
stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2. All lots in the development shall be subject to Single-Family Design
Review.
3. The maximum building height shall be 21 feet.
4. The landscape setback along 107th Avenue and Missouri Avenue shall be
planted with a minimum 75% 2-inch caliper trees and minimum 25% 3-inch
caliper or multi-trunk trees, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department
5. A minimum of 10% percent of the gross site area shall be retained as
common area, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
6. The common open space area shall provide a minimum of 3 active
recreational elements, such as, but not limited to, playground sets, ramadas,
or a barbeque area, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
7. All sidewalks shall be detached with a minimum 5-foot-wide landscaped strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb and shall include minimum 2-
inch caliper single-trunk shade trees, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
8. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved
by the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall
comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
9. The developer shall dedicate 40-feet of right-of-way and construct the east
side of 107th Avenue, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.
10. The developer shall dedicate minimum 30-feet of right-of-way and construct
the north side of Missouri Avenue, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
11. The developer shall underground existing electrical utilities within the public
right-of-way that are impacted or those that require relocation as part of the
Page 522
project. The developer shall be responsible for coordinating with affected
utilities for review and permitting.
12. The developer shall underground all existing irrigation facilities along 107th
Avenue outside of City of Phoenix right-of-way. The developer shall contact
SRP to identify existing land rights and establish the appropriate process to
relocate facility. Relocations that require additional dedications or land
transfer require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review
approval.
13. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record
documents that disclose to purchasers of property within the
development(s) the existence and operational characteristics of nearby
existing ranchettes and animal privilege private properties that may cause
adverse noise, odors, dust, and other externalities The form and content
of such documents shall be according to the templates and instructions
provided which have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
The disclosures shall be noted in the CC&Rs in a section titled
“nuisances”.
14. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for proposed
development for the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to Planning and Development Department’s
preliminary plat approval.
15. The developer shall dedicate to the City of Phoenix an avigation easement
for the site, per the form and content prescribed by the City Attorney, prior to
Planning and Development Department preliminary plat approval. The
developer shall also dedicate and record an avigation easement in favor of
the City of Glendale in the form submitted to the City of Phoenix. The
avigation easements shall be noted in the CC&Rs in a section titled “airport
nuisances”.
16. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Glendale Airport to future owners and tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to
the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney, and in accordance with State law requiring
airport disclosure.
17. The developer’s engineer of record shall certify and note on the preliminary
and final plats as well as relevant construction drawings that the proposed
residential construction shall achieve a maximum interior noise level of 45
decibels (DNL).
18. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant
shall conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey
Page 523
report of the development area for review and approval by the City
Archaeologist prior to clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or
grading approval.
19. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
20. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction,
the developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a
33-foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time
for the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
21. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by
the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July,
2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
Page 524
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 525
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-11-22-5
PARCEL NO. 1: The East 258.00 feet of the South half of the Southwest quarter of
the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 2 North, Range 1 East of the Gila
and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona.
PARCEL NO. 2: The West 258.00 feet of the East 516.00 feet of the South half of
the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 2 North,
Range 1 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County,
Arizona.
PARCEL NO. 3: The West 258.00 feet of the East 774.00 feet of the South half of
the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 2 North,
Range 1 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County,
Arizona.
PARCEL NO. 4: The West 258 00 feet of the East 1032.00 feet of the South half of
the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 2 North,
Range 1 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County,
Arizona.
PARCEL NO. 5: The South half of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 17, Township 2 North, Range 1 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and
Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona; EXCEPT the East 1032.00 feet thereof; and
EXCEPT the West 33.00 feet.
Page 526
Page 527
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-12-22-7 -
Northwest Corner of 47th Avenue and Baseline Road (Ordinance G-6999)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to R1-8 (Single-Family Residence District) to
allow single-family residential.
Summary
Current Zoning: S-1
Proposed Zoning: R1-8
Acreage: 14.07 acres
Proposed Use: Single-family residential
Owner: Rogers Family Living Trust
Applicant: Brennan Ray, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Representative: Brennan Ray, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Laveen Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 9, 2022,
and recommended approval with additional stipulations by a vote of 9-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Jun. 2, 2022, and
recommended approval per the staff memo dated Jun. 2, 2022, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Northwest corner of 47th Avenue and Baseline Road.
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 4702 W. Baseline Road.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 528
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-12-22-7) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R1-18 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 14.07-acre property located on the northwest
corner of 47th Avenue and Baseline Road in a portion of Section 33, Township 1
North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby
changed from “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence District), to “R1-18” (Single-
Family Residence District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
Page 529
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance to the site plan date
stamped May 4, 2022, with specific regard to the following element, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. A minimum of 16% of the gross site area shall be retained as open
space.
2. The conceptual elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Hearing Officer through the public hearing process for stipulation
modification prior to approval of the Single-Family Design Review
Diversity Exhibit, with specific regard to the inclusion of the below
elements. This is legislative review for conceptual purposes only. Specific
development standards and requirements will be determined by the
Planning Hearing Officer and the Planning and Development Department.
a. All elevations shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following
architectural embellishments and detailing: textural changes,
pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size and location,
and/or overhang canopies.
b. All elevations shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following
building materials: native stone, burnt adobe, textured brick, wood
(when shaded by overhangs or deep recesses), slump block,
ceramic tile (matte finish), stucco, and/or exposed aggregate
concrete.
c. The front elevations shall consist of a minimum 25% non-stucco
accent material.
d. All garage doors shall have decorative embellishments such as
window panels, added materials surrounding the door, and/or
trellises.
e. A minimum of 75% of the standard elevations provided shall
include patios and/or covered porches in the front yard at a
minimum of 60 square feet in area and a depth of at least six feet,
and clearly separated from the front yard with fencing, subject to
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
3. Lots 7, 8, 9, and 10 along Baseline Road shall be limited to 26 feet, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 530
4. No more than two two-story homes shall be built adjacent to one another
along 47th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
5. Homes shall have minimum 5-foot-wide side yard setbacks.
6. The developer shall install wiring within homes for electric vehicle
capabilities.
7. Required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50% 2-inch
caliper and 50% 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, with 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
8. The entry drives shall incorporate enhanced landscaping on both sides,
planted with a variety of at least three plant materials, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
9. The developer shall dedicate a 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement
(MUTE) along the north side of Baseline Road and construct a minimum
10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the easement in accordance with
the MAG supplement detail and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the
developer shall work with the Site Planning section on an alternate design
through the technical appeal process.
10. A minimum 22-foot setback shall be provided to the front of garages,
measured from the back of the sidewalk, for each home in the development,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
11. The developer shall dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way along the west side of
47th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. The developer shall complete the west side of 47th Avenue to include a
minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and minimum 8-foot-wide landscape
area located between the back of curb and sidewalk to match the northern
limit of the site, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The developer shall replenish the existing streetscape along Baseline
Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
14. Where sidewalks are detached along 47th Avenue, Baseline Road, and
internal to the site, the landscape area located between the sidewalk and
back of curb shall be planted to the following standards, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department:
Page 531
a. Minimum 3-inch caliper, large canopy, single-trunk, shade trees
placed a minimum of 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings
to provide a minimum of 75% shade on adjacent sidewalks.
b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a
maximum mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of
75% live coverage at maturity.
c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
15. The developer shall construct a clearly defined and shaded pedestrian
pathway providing access to the multi-use-trail along Baseline Road, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
16. Traffic calming measures shall be installed within the development, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department.
17. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
18. The developer shall rebuild the bus stop pad along westbound Baseline
Road according to P1260 and P1258, unless stated otherwise by the Public
Transit Department.
19. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant
shall conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey
report of the development area for review and approval by the City
Archaeologist prior to clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or
grading approval.
20. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from
the Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a
qualified archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are
necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data
recovery excavations.
21 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction,
the developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a
33-foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time
for the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
Page 532
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 533
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-12-22-7
The Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 1 North,
Range 2 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;
EXCEPT the South 55 feet thereof;
EXCEPT all that portion thereof lying within the Final Plat for Rogers Ranch Parcel 9,
recorded in Book 817 of Maps, Page 16;
EXCEPT all that portion thereof lying within the Final Plat of Rogers Ranch Unit 4,
recorded in Book 680 of Maps, Page 24;
EXCEPT all that portion thereof lying within 47th Avenue and Baseline Road as shown
on Map of Dedication for Rogers Ranch, recorded in Book 623 of Maps, Page 29.
Page 534
Page 535
Report
Northwest Corner of 47th Avenue and Baseline Road (Ordinance G-6999)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to R1-8 (Single-Family Residence District) to
allow single-family residential.
Summary
Current Zoning: S-1
Proposed Zoning: R1-8
Acreage: 14.07 acres
Proposed Use: Single-family residential
Owner: Rogers Family Living Trust
Applicant: Brennan Ray, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Representative: Brennan Ray, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Laveen Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 9, 2022,
and recommended approval with additional stipulations by a vote of 9-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Jun. 2, 2022, and
recommended approval per the staff memo dated Jun. 2, 2022, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Northwest corner of 47th Avenue and Baseline Road.
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 4702 W. Baseline Road.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 528
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-12-22-7) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R1-18 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 14.07-acre property located on the northwest
corner of 47th Avenue and Baseline Road in a portion of Section 33, Township 1
North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby
changed from “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence District), to “R1-18” (Single-
Family Residence District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
Page 529
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance to the site plan date
stamped May 4, 2022, with specific regard to the following element, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. A minimum of 16% of the gross site area shall be retained as open
space.
2. The conceptual elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Hearing Officer through the public hearing process for stipulation
modification prior to approval of the Single-Family Design Review
Diversity Exhibit, with specific regard to the inclusion of the below
elements. This is legislative review for conceptual purposes only. Specific
development standards and requirements will be determined by the
Planning Hearing Officer and the Planning and Development Department.
a. All elevations shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following
architectural embellishments and detailing: textural changes,
pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size and location,
and/or overhang canopies.
b. All elevations shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following
building materials: native stone, burnt adobe, textured brick, wood
(when shaded by overhangs or deep recesses), slump block,
ceramic tile (matte finish), stucco, and/or exposed aggregate
concrete.
c. The front elevations shall consist of a minimum 25% non-stucco
accent material.
d. All garage doors shall have decorative embellishments such as
window panels, added materials surrounding the door, and/or
trellises.
e. A minimum of 75% of the standard elevations provided shall
include patios and/or covered porches in the front yard at a
minimum of 60 square feet in area and a depth of at least six feet,
and clearly separated from the front yard with fencing, subject to
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
3. Lots 7, 8, 9, and 10 along Baseline Road shall be limited to 26 feet, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 530
4. No more than two two-story homes shall be built adjacent to one another
along 47th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
5. Homes shall have minimum 5-foot-wide side yard setbacks.
6. The developer shall install wiring within homes for electric vehicle
capabilities.
7. Required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50% 2-inch
caliper and 50% 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, with 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
8. The entry drives shall incorporate enhanced landscaping on both sides,
planted with a variety of at least three plant materials, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
9. The developer shall dedicate a 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement
(MUTE) along the north side of Baseline Road and construct a minimum
10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the easement in accordance with
the MAG supplement detail and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the
developer shall work with the Site Planning section on an alternate design
through the technical appeal process.
10. A minimum 22-foot setback shall be provided to the front of garages,
measured from the back of the sidewalk, for each home in the development,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
11. The developer shall dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way along the west side of
47th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. The developer shall complete the west side of 47th Avenue to include a
minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and minimum 8-foot-wide landscape
area located between the back of curb and sidewalk to match the northern
limit of the site, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The developer shall replenish the existing streetscape along Baseline
Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
14. Where sidewalks are detached along 47th Avenue, Baseline Road, and
internal to the site, the landscape area located between the sidewalk and
back of curb shall be planted to the following standards, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department:
Page 531
a. Minimum 3-inch caliper, large canopy, single-trunk, shade trees
placed a minimum of 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings
to provide a minimum of 75% shade on adjacent sidewalks.
b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a
maximum mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of
75% live coverage at maturity.
c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
15. The developer shall construct a clearly defined and shaded pedestrian
pathway providing access to the multi-use-trail along Baseline Road, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
16. Traffic calming measures shall be installed within the development, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department.
17. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
18. The developer shall rebuild the bus stop pad along westbound Baseline
Road according to P1260 and P1258, unless stated otherwise by the Public
Transit Department.
19. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant
shall conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey
report of the development area for review and approval by the City
Archaeologist prior to clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or
grading approval.
20. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from
the Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a
qualified archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are
necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data
recovery excavations.
21 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction,
the developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a
33-foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time
for the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
Page 532
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 533
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-12-22-7
The Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 1 North,
Range 2 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;
EXCEPT the South 55 feet thereof;
EXCEPT all that portion thereof lying within the Final Plat for Rogers Ranch Parcel 9,
recorded in Book 817 of Maps, Page 16;
EXCEPT all that portion thereof lying within the Final Plat of Rogers Ranch Unit 4,
recorded in Book 680 of Maps, Page 24;
EXCEPT all that portion thereof lying within 47th Avenue and Baseline Road as shown
on Map of Dedication for Rogers Ranch, recorded in Book 623 of Maps, Page 29.
Page 534
Page 535
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-PV-4-
21-2 - Southwest Corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road (Resolution
22045)
Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation on 6.10
acres from Industrial to Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per
acre). This is a companion case to Z-76-21-2 and must be heard first, followed by Z-76
-21-2.
Summary
Application: GPA-PV-4-21-2
Current Designation: Industrial
Proposed Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per
are)
Acreage: 6.10 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential and commercial uses
Owner: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Info: The Paradise Village Planning Committee heard this case on Feb. 7, 2022,
for information only.
VPC Action: The Paradise Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 2,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 11-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road.
Council District: 2
Page 536
Parcel Addresses: 14646 N. Kierland Blvd., and 6901 E. Marilyn Road.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 537
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-PV-4-21-2,
CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.
____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by
Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-PV-4-21-2. The 6.10-acre site
located at the southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road is designated
as Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre).
SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as
shown below:
Page 538
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July 2022.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:___________________________
___________________________
-2- Resolution
Page 539
REVIEWED BY:
______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
PL:tml:LF22-0991:7-1-22
-3- Resolution
Page 540
Attachment B
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
April 25, 2022
Application: GPA-PV-4-21-2
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Owner: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Location: Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road
Acreage: 6.10 acres
Current Plan Designation: Industrial (6.10 acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling
units per acre) (6.10 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: Minor General Plan Amendment for a mix of
commercial and residential 15+ dwelling units per
acre
Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee Date: May 2, 2022
Staff Recommendation: Approval
FINDINGS:
1) The companion rezoning case, Z-76-21-2, proposes development that is
consistent in scale and character with land uses in the surrounding area to the
north and west.
2) The Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre) land use
designation will permit new zoning to be applied to the site that maximizes
opportunities within the Paradise Valley Village.
Page 541
Staff Analysis
GPA-PV-4-21-2
Page 2
3) The proposed land use designation provides consistency with the land use
pattern of property in the immediate area, while allowing for the introduction of
new uses that will complement the existing employment and commercial uses in
the area.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is located at the southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road and is occupied by one commercial office building and surface parking areas. The
office building is located along the western portion of the site overlooking the Kierland
golf course, while surface parking occupies the remainder of the site. The companion
Rezoning Case No. Z-76-21-2 is a request to allow PUD zoning for multifamily
residential and commercial uses on the entirety of the site.
General Plan Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
Currently, the site has a General Plan Land Use Map designation of Industrial and the
requested General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed Use (Commercial /
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre) which will allow for additional housing choices
and commercial uses in the area. Recent development patterns suggest that there is a
growing demand for housing choices and commercial plus employment uses in the
Kierland area. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map change will allow for the
continuation of these development trends across the greater Kierland area.
Page 542
Staff Analysis
GPA-PV-4-21-2
Page 3
The requested Mixed Use designation will allow commercial and residential land uses to
locate on the site in compliance with the companion PUD's development standards.
Maps of the existing and proposed General Plan Land Use Map designations can be
found attached to this report.
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
The table below provides a summary of the surrounding General Plan (GP) Land Use
Map designations, existing land uses and zoning surrounding the site.
Location GP Land Use Existing Land Uses Zoning
North (including Industrial Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
across Marilyn
Road)
South Industrial Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
East (across Industrial Commercial office PUD
Kierland
Boulevard)
West Parks/Open Space - Golf course GC PCD
Private
The site is also approximately 0.1 mile south of Greenway Road and lies within the
boundaries of the Maricopa Association of Governments designated Desert
Ridge/Kierland Major Employment Center and is in close proximity to a City of Phoenix
designated employment center. Providing additional housing options in close proximity
to the nearby workforce will add to the sustainability of established office and
commercial uses built around the Desert Ridge/Kierland Major Employment Center.
RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES
• CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES;
LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote and encourage compatible development
and redevelopment with a mix of housing types in neighborhoods close to
employment centers, commercial areas, and where transit or transportation
alternatives exist.
This request and the concurrent Icon Kierland PUD promotes redevelopment of
the site by allowing for an increase in intensity at a scale compatible with
surrounding properties and the Kierland area. The development is located in a
mixed-use corridor where nearby properties are multifamily or commercial. The
project site is also within a designated employment center. The concentration of
people near employment uses promotes the sustainability of nearby commercial
uses.
Page 543
Staff Analysis
GPA-PV-4-21-2
Page 4
• CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a
mix of housing types and densities where appropriate within each village
that support a broad range of lifestyles.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment will further diversify the
existing land use map designations in this part of the city by allowing multifamily
and commercial uses in a major employment center. This will help to provide
diverse housing opportunities in this area to both current and future residents.
• CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Create new
development or redevelopment that is sensitive to the scale and character
of the surrounding neighborhoods and incorporates adequate development
standards to prevent negative impact(s) on the residential properties.
The companion PUD narrative incorporates standards that are compatible in
scale and intensity with the surrounding area and properties adjacent to the site.
The development is located in a mixed-use corridor where nearby properties are
multifamily or commercial. Further, there are no existing single-family residential
properties in close proximity that will be directly impacted by this development.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of GPA-PV-4-21-2 as filed. The request aligns with the
goals and polices of the General Plan and will result in a land use designation that will
continue to support surrounding uses while maximizing the property’s location in an
employment center. This proposed Minor General Plan Amendment request is
consistent with surrounding land uses and General Plan Land Use Map designations in
the general area.
Writer
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
April 25, 2022
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Page 544
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-PV-4-21-2 ACRES: 6.10 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Paradise Valley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 4/20/2022
APPLICANT: Snell & Wilmer, LLP
EXISTING:
Industrial ( 6.10 +/- Acres)
KIERLAND BLVD
Proposed Change Area
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac MARILYN RD
Residential 15+ du/ac
Industrial
Parks/Open Space - Privately
Owned
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce / Business Park /
Residential 15+ du/ac)
ACOMA DR
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ du/ac)
( 6.10 +/- Acres)
KIERLAND BLVD
Proposed Change Area
Mixed Use (Commercial / MARILYN RD
Residential 15+ du/ac)
ACO MA DR
Page 545
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-PV-4-21-2_BW ACRES: 6.10 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Paradise Valley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 4/20/2022
APPLICANT: Snell & Wilmer, LLP
EXISTING:
Industrial ( 6.10 +/- Acres)
KIERLAND BLVD
Proposed Change Area
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Residential 10 to 15 du/acre
MARILYN RD
Residential 15+ du/acre
Industrial
Parks/Open Space - Privately
Owned
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce / Business Park /
Residential 15+ du/ac)
ACOMA DR
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ du/ac)
( 6.10 +/- Acres)
Proposed Change Area KIERLAND BLVD
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Residential 15+ du/ac) MARILYN RD
ACOMA DR
Page 546
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-PV-4-21-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting February 7, 2022
Request To amend the General Plan Land Use Map Designation
on approximately 6.10 from Industrial to Mixed Use
(Commercial/Commerce/Business Park/Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre)
Location Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2 were heard concurrently.
Mr. Nick Wood, Representative with Snell & Wilmer, introduced himself and gave an
overview of both e the GPA and Rezoning requests. He went over the need for housing
within an employment center, the consistency with the character of the surrounding area
and how this site will function with recently approved cases in the nearby area. Mr.
Wood also shard specific details about the site plan, elevations, open space areas and
traffic. He highlighted the setbacks proposed and frontage standards, which will activate
the street frontages and help to create a more pedestrian friendly environment. He
shared the shade study, which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect and
discussed the proposed perimeter landscape treatments, which will provide visual
interest.
VPC Discussion:
None
Public Comment:
None
Applicants Response:
None
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 547
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-PV-4-21-2
Date of VPC Meeting May 2, 2022
Request To amend the General Plan Land Use Map Designation
on approximately 6.10 acres located at the southwest
corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road from
Industrial to Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre) to allow multifamily residential
and commercial uses.
Location Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 11-0 with committee members Balderrama, Goodhue,
Hall, Mazza, Petersen, Popovic, Schmidt, Severs,
Sparks, Wise, and Lesher in favor.
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2 were heard concurrently by the committee.
Chair Gubser and committee member Bowman left the meeting, bringing the
quorum to 11 members.
Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a presentation on
cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2. Mr. Bojórquez discussed the location of
the site, noting the existing and proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designations. Mr. Bojórquez discussed the surrounding zoning and proposed
land uses part of the PUD case. Mr. Bojórquez discussed the location of the site
within the Desert Ridge and Kierland employment center and described how this
project furthers other policy plans. Mr. Bojórquez described the proposed site
plan and building elevations, noting that a maximum height of six stories and 70
feet would be permitted. Mr. Bojórquez noted that that one letter of support and
three letters in opposition had been received. Mr. Bojórquez concluded the
presentation by providing the staff findings and recommendation of approval,
describing the proposed stipulations for case Z-76-21-2, as presented in the staff
report.
Nick Wood, representing the applicant with Snell & Wilmer LLP, introduced
himself and his team. Mr. Wood discussed the location of the site in relation to
other projects approved in the area. Mr. Wood stated that this development is
over 500 feet north of the closest single-family home south of the site, adding
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 548
that the Kierland Community Alliance supports this project. Mr. Wood stated that
the minor general plan amendment case supports the removal of industrially-
designated land on the site. Mr. Wood compared the previous proposal with the
current proposal, which show a decrease in density and shifting of the building
away from the west property line. Mr. Wood stated that other changes made
include the addition of patios along the street to activate this area and two stories
of underground parking below grade. Mr. Wood discussed the proposed
development standards, including proposed parking standards. Mr. Wood
discussed the proposed open space, building articulation designs and showed
site renderings. Mr. Wood concluded the presentation by requesting approval of
cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2.
Questions from the Committee:
Vice Chair Lesher asked if any committee members had questions for the
presenters.
Jennifer Hall gave kudos to the applicant for the changes made and appreciates
the architecture provided in this project. This design goes above and beyond,
plus it looks classy.
Alex Popovic stated that a loss of 51 dwelling units from 370 to 319 is a big
compromise. Mr. Popovic appreciates the applicant’s collaboration with the
community.
Public Comment:
None.
Applicant Response to Public Comment:
None.
Vice Chair Lesher asked for a motion on each item.
MOTION – GPA-PV-4-21-2:
Alan Spark motioned to recommend approval of GPA-PV-4-21-2 per the staff
recommendation. Alex Popovic seconded the motion.
VOTE – GPA-PV-4-21-2:
11-0; motion to approve passed with committee members Balderrama, Goodhue,
Hall, Mazza, Petersen, Popovic, Schmidt, Severs, Sparks, Wise, and Lesher in
favor.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
No comments.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 549
Attachment E
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION June 2, 2022
ITEM NO: 4
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: GPA-PV-4-21-2 (Companion Case Z-76-21-2)
Location: Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road
From: Industrial
To: Mixed Use (Commercial/Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre)
Acreage: 6.10
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment for Mixed Use (Commercial/Residential
15+ dwelling units per acre).
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Owner: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 2/7/2022 Information only.
Paradise Valley 5/2/2022 Approval. Vote: 11-0.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee recommendation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Gaynor made a MOTION to approve GPA-PV-4-21-2, per the
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Gaynor
Second: McCabe
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Howard and Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes (possibly in error)
Findings:
1. The companion rezoning case, Z-76-21-2, proposes development that is consistent in
scale and character with land uses in the surrounding area to the north and west.
2. The Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre) land use
designation will permit new zoning to be applied to the site that maximizes
opportunities within the Paradise Valley Village.
3. The proposed land use designation provides consistency with the land use pattern of
property in the immediate area, while allowing for the introduction of new uses that will
complement the existing employment and commercial uses in the area.
Page 550
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 551
Report
21-2 - Southwest Corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road (Resolution
22045)
Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation on 6.10
acres from Industrial to Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per
acre). This is a companion case to Z-76-21-2 and must be heard first, followed by Z-76
-21-2.
Summary
Application: GPA-PV-4-21-2
Current Designation: Industrial
Proposed Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per
are)
Acreage: 6.10 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential and commercial uses
Owner: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Info: The Paradise Village Planning Committee heard this case on Feb. 7, 2022,
for information only.
VPC Action: The Paradise Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 2,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 11-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road.
Council District: 2
Page 536
Parcel Addresses: 14646 N. Kierland Blvd., and 6901 E. Marilyn Road.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 537
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-PV-4-21-2,
CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.
____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by
Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-PV-4-21-2. The 6.10-acre site
located at the southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road is designated
as Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre).
SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as
shown below:
Page 538
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July 2022.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:___________________________
___________________________
-2- Resolution
Page 539
REVIEWED BY:
______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
PL:tml:LF22-0991:7-1-22
-3- Resolution
Page 540
Attachment B
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
April 25, 2022
Application: GPA-PV-4-21-2
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Owner: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Location: Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road
Acreage: 6.10 acres
Current Plan Designation: Industrial (6.10 acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling
units per acre) (6.10 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: Minor General Plan Amendment for a mix of
commercial and residential 15+ dwelling units per
acre
Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee Date: May 2, 2022
Staff Recommendation: Approval
FINDINGS:
1) The companion rezoning case, Z-76-21-2, proposes development that is
consistent in scale and character with land uses in the surrounding area to the
north and west.
2) The Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre) land use
designation will permit new zoning to be applied to the site that maximizes
opportunities within the Paradise Valley Village.
Page 541
Staff Analysis
GPA-PV-4-21-2
Page 2
3) The proposed land use designation provides consistency with the land use
pattern of property in the immediate area, while allowing for the introduction of
new uses that will complement the existing employment and commercial uses in
the area.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is located at the southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road and is occupied by one commercial office building and surface parking areas. The
office building is located along the western portion of the site overlooking the Kierland
golf course, while surface parking occupies the remainder of the site. The companion
Rezoning Case No. Z-76-21-2 is a request to allow PUD zoning for multifamily
residential and commercial uses on the entirety of the site.
General Plan Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
Currently, the site has a General Plan Land Use Map designation of Industrial and the
requested General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed Use (Commercial /
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre) which will allow for additional housing choices
and commercial uses in the area. Recent development patterns suggest that there is a
growing demand for housing choices and commercial plus employment uses in the
Kierland area. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map change will allow for the
continuation of these development trends across the greater Kierland area.
Page 542
Staff Analysis
GPA-PV-4-21-2
Page 3
The requested Mixed Use designation will allow commercial and residential land uses to
locate on the site in compliance with the companion PUD's development standards.
Maps of the existing and proposed General Plan Land Use Map designations can be
found attached to this report.
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
The table below provides a summary of the surrounding General Plan (GP) Land Use
Map designations, existing land uses and zoning surrounding the site.
Location GP Land Use Existing Land Uses Zoning
North (including Industrial Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
across Marilyn
Road)
South Industrial Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
East (across Industrial Commercial office PUD
Kierland
Boulevard)
West Parks/Open Space - Golf course GC PCD
Private
The site is also approximately 0.1 mile south of Greenway Road and lies within the
boundaries of the Maricopa Association of Governments designated Desert
Ridge/Kierland Major Employment Center and is in close proximity to a City of Phoenix
designated employment center. Providing additional housing options in close proximity
to the nearby workforce will add to the sustainability of established office and
commercial uses built around the Desert Ridge/Kierland Major Employment Center.
RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES
• CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES;
LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote and encourage compatible development
and redevelopment with a mix of housing types in neighborhoods close to
employment centers, commercial areas, and where transit or transportation
alternatives exist.
This request and the concurrent Icon Kierland PUD promotes redevelopment of
the site by allowing for an increase in intensity at a scale compatible with
surrounding properties and the Kierland area. The development is located in a
mixed-use corridor where nearby properties are multifamily or commercial. The
project site is also within a designated employment center. The concentration of
people near employment uses promotes the sustainability of nearby commercial
uses.
Page 543
Staff Analysis
GPA-PV-4-21-2
Page 4
• CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a
mix of housing types and densities where appropriate within each village
that support a broad range of lifestyles.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment will further diversify the
existing land use map designations in this part of the city by allowing multifamily
and commercial uses in a major employment center. This will help to provide
diverse housing opportunities in this area to both current and future residents.
• CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Create new
development or redevelopment that is sensitive to the scale and character
of the surrounding neighborhoods and incorporates adequate development
standards to prevent negative impact(s) on the residential properties.
The companion PUD narrative incorporates standards that are compatible in
scale and intensity with the surrounding area and properties adjacent to the site.
The development is located in a mixed-use corridor where nearby properties are
multifamily or commercial. Further, there are no existing single-family residential
properties in close proximity that will be directly impacted by this development.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of GPA-PV-4-21-2 as filed. The request aligns with the
goals and polices of the General Plan and will result in a land use designation that will
continue to support surrounding uses while maximizing the property’s location in an
employment center. This proposed Minor General Plan Amendment request is
consistent with surrounding land uses and General Plan Land Use Map designations in
the general area.
Writer
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
April 25, 2022
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Page 544
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-PV-4-21-2 ACRES: 6.10 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Paradise Valley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 4/20/2022
APPLICANT: Snell & Wilmer, LLP
EXISTING:
Industrial ( 6.10 +/- Acres)
KIERLAND BLVD
Proposed Change Area
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac MARILYN RD
Residential 15+ du/ac
Industrial
Parks/Open Space - Privately
Owned
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce / Business Park /
Residential 15+ du/ac)
ACOMA DR
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ du/ac)
( 6.10 +/- Acres)
KIERLAND BLVD
Proposed Change Area
Mixed Use (Commercial / MARILYN RD
Residential 15+ du/ac)
ACO MA DR
Page 545
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-PV-4-21-2_BW ACRES: 6.10 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Paradise Valley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 4/20/2022
APPLICANT: Snell & Wilmer, LLP
EXISTING:
Industrial ( 6.10 +/- Acres)
KIERLAND BLVD
Proposed Change Area
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Residential 10 to 15 du/acre
MARILYN RD
Residential 15+ du/acre
Industrial
Parks/Open Space - Privately
Owned
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Commerce / Business Park /
Residential 15+ du/ac)
ACOMA DR
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ du/ac)
( 6.10 +/- Acres)
Proposed Change Area KIERLAND BLVD
Mixed Use (Commercial /
Residential 15+ du/ac) MARILYN RD
ACOMA DR
Page 546
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-PV-4-21-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting February 7, 2022
Request To amend the General Plan Land Use Map Designation
on approximately 6.10 from Industrial to Mixed Use
(Commercial/Commerce/Business Park/Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre)
Location Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2 were heard concurrently.
Mr. Nick Wood, Representative with Snell & Wilmer, introduced himself and gave an
overview of both e the GPA and Rezoning requests. He went over the need for housing
within an employment center, the consistency with the character of the surrounding area
and how this site will function with recently approved cases in the nearby area. Mr.
Wood also shard specific details about the site plan, elevations, open space areas and
traffic. He highlighted the setbacks proposed and frontage standards, which will activate
the street frontages and help to create a more pedestrian friendly environment. He
shared the shade study, which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect and
discussed the proposed perimeter landscape treatments, which will provide visual
interest.
VPC Discussion:
None
Public Comment:
None
Applicants Response:
None
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 547
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-PV-4-21-2
Date of VPC Meeting May 2, 2022
Request To amend the General Plan Land Use Map Designation
on approximately 6.10 acres located at the southwest
corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road from
Industrial to Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre) to allow multifamily residential
and commercial uses.
Location Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 11-0 with committee members Balderrama, Goodhue,
Hall, Mazza, Petersen, Popovic, Schmidt, Severs,
Sparks, Wise, and Lesher in favor.
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2 were heard concurrently by the committee.
Chair Gubser and committee member Bowman left the meeting, bringing the
quorum to 11 members.
Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a presentation on
cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2. Mr. Bojórquez discussed the location of
the site, noting the existing and proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designations. Mr. Bojórquez discussed the surrounding zoning and proposed
land uses part of the PUD case. Mr. Bojórquez discussed the location of the site
within the Desert Ridge and Kierland employment center and described how this
project furthers other policy plans. Mr. Bojórquez described the proposed site
plan and building elevations, noting that a maximum height of six stories and 70
feet would be permitted. Mr. Bojórquez noted that that one letter of support and
three letters in opposition had been received. Mr. Bojórquez concluded the
presentation by providing the staff findings and recommendation of approval,
describing the proposed stipulations for case Z-76-21-2, as presented in the staff
report.
Nick Wood, representing the applicant with Snell & Wilmer LLP, introduced
himself and his team. Mr. Wood discussed the location of the site in relation to
other projects approved in the area. Mr. Wood stated that this development is
over 500 feet north of the closest single-family home south of the site, adding
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 548
that the Kierland Community Alliance supports this project. Mr. Wood stated that
the minor general plan amendment case supports the removal of industrially-
designated land on the site. Mr. Wood compared the previous proposal with the
current proposal, which show a decrease in density and shifting of the building
away from the west property line. Mr. Wood stated that other changes made
include the addition of patios along the street to activate this area and two stories
of underground parking below grade. Mr. Wood discussed the proposed
development standards, including proposed parking standards. Mr. Wood
discussed the proposed open space, building articulation designs and showed
site renderings. Mr. Wood concluded the presentation by requesting approval of
cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2.
Questions from the Committee:
Vice Chair Lesher asked if any committee members had questions for the
presenters.
Jennifer Hall gave kudos to the applicant for the changes made and appreciates
the architecture provided in this project. This design goes above and beyond,
plus it looks classy.
Alex Popovic stated that a loss of 51 dwelling units from 370 to 319 is a big
compromise. Mr. Popovic appreciates the applicant’s collaboration with the
community.
Public Comment:
None.
Applicant Response to Public Comment:
None.
Vice Chair Lesher asked for a motion on each item.
MOTION – GPA-PV-4-21-2:
Alan Spark motioned to recommend approval of GPA-PV-4-21-2 per the staff
recommendation. Alex Popovic seconded the motion.
VOTE – GPA-PV-4-21-2:
11-0; motion to approve passed with committee members Balderrama, Goodhue,
Hall, Mazza, Petersen, Popovic, Schmidt, Severs, Sparks, Wise, and Lesher in
favor.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
No comments.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 549
Attachment E
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION June 2, 2022
ITEM NO: 4
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: GPA-PV-4-21-2 (Companion Case Z-76-21-2)
Location: Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road
From: Industrial
To: Mixed Use (Commercial/Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre)
Acreage: 6.10
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment for Mixed Use (Commercial/Residential
15+ dwelling units per acre).
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Owner: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 2/7/2022 Information only.
Paradise Valley 5/2/2022 Approval. Vote: 11-0.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee recommendation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Gaynor made a MOTION to approve GPA-PV-4-21-2, per the
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Gaynor
Second: McCabe
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Howard and Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes (possibly in error)
Findings:
1. The companion rezoning case, Z-76-21-2, proposes development that is consistent in
scale and character with land uses in the surrounding area to the north and west.
2. The Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre) land use
designation will permit new zoning to be applied to the site that maximizes
opportunities within the Paradise Valley Village.
3. The proposed land use designation provides consistency with the land use pattern of
property in the immediate area, while allowing for the introduction of new uses that will
complement the existing employment and commercial uses in the area.
Page 550
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 551
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-76-21-2 (Icon
Kierland PUD) - Southwest Corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road
(Ordinance G-7007)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-76-21-
2 and rezone the site from CP/GCP PCD (Commerce Park District / General
Commerce Park Option, Planned Community District) to PUD (Planned Unit
Development) to allow multifamily residential and commercial uses. This is a
companion case to GPA-PV-4-21-2 and must be heard following GPA-PV-4-21-2.
Summary
Current Zoning: CP/GCP PCD
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 6.10 acres
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow multifamily residential and commercial
uses.
Owner: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on Feb. 7,
2022, for information only.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on May
2, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 11-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 14646 N. Kierland Blvd. and 6901 E. Marilyn Road.
Page 552
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 553
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-76-21-2) FROM CP/GCP PCD (COMMERCE
PARK DISTRICT / GENERAL COMMERCE PARK OPTION,
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 6.10-acre property located at the southwest
corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road in a portion of Section 10, Township 3
North, Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed
from “CP/GCP PCD” (Commerce Park District / General Commerce Park Option,
Planned Community District) to “PUD” (Planned Unit Development).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
Page 554
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Icon at Kierland PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with Development Narrative
date stamped April 4, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations.
a. Front Cover, add “City Council adopted: [Insert Adoption date]”
b. Page 9, Section D2.a., Landscape Setbacks (Minimum): Clarify
landscape setback standard along the north and south property lines to
be consistent with the proposed site plan by requiring a minimum 5-foot-
wide landscape setback along the south and a minimum 0-foot-wide
landscape setback along the north property line where not adjacent to a
street.
c. Page 10, Section D2.d., Perimeter Property Lines – Not Adjacent to
Public Right-of-Way (North, South, and West Property Lines): Remove
the reference to the north property line as no landscape setback is
provided here.
d. Page 11, Section D3.b., Parking Standards, Automotive Parking
Location, Parking Location, Automotive: Modify the maximum number of
parking spaces along the main entry drive that are located outside of the
garage building footprint or building envelope to a maximum of five (5)
spaces to be consistent with the proposed site plan.
e. Page 17, Section E2. b., Uniform Perimeter Design: Modify the third
bullet to “Five (5) different accent species”.
f. Page 21, Section H.1, Infrastructure, Grading and Drainage: Replace the
fourth sentence as follows: Therefore, the subject site is not anticipated
to provide any supplemental retention onsite, and may be required to
address “first flush” stormwater treatment in accordance with the City of
Phoenix Storm Water Policies and Standards Manual, current edition.
g. Page 23, Section I., Comparative Zoning Standards Table: Replace
CP/GCP standards with C-2 standards.
Page 555
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City.
3. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
4. The developer shall record a Notice to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to
Airport in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of
Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future owners or tenants of the property.
5. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to final site plan
approval that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the
development received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary
equipment used during construction exceeds the height of the permanent
structure a separate Form 7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and a “No
Hazard Determination” obtained prior to the construction start date.
6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
7. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
Page 556
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 557
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-76-21-2
A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 4
EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 5B-2, KIERLAND PARCELS 5B-1 AND 5B-2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
RECORDED IN BOOK 431 OF MAPS, PAGE 8, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA.
Page 558
Page 559
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-76-21-2
Icon Kierland PUD
April 25, 2022
Paradise Valley Village Planning May 2, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 2, 2022
Request From: CP/GCP PCD (6.10 acres)
Request To: PUD (6.10 acres)
Proposed Use: Planned Unit Development to allow multifamily
residential and commercial uses
Location: Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and
Marilyn Road
Owners: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
Current: Industrial
General Plan Land Use Map Designation Proposed (GPA-PV-4-21-2): Mixed Use
(Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units
per acre)
Collector Width varies from 40-foot to 35-
Kierland Boulevard
Street foot west half street
Street Map
Classification Local
Marilyn Road 30-foot south half street
Street
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Promote and encourage compatible development and redevelopment
with a mix of housing types in neighborhoods close to employment centers,
commercial areas, and where transit or transportation alternatives exist.
The Icon Kierland Planned Unit Development (PUD) proposes multifamily and commercial
uses that are compatible in scale and intensity with the surrounding Kierland area and
properties adjacent to the site. The development is in a mixed-use corridor where nearby
Page 560
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
properties are multifamily or commercial. The project site is also within a designated
employment center, thus the concentration of residential uses in this commercial area will
promote new and existing businesses. The requested PUD will facilitate ongoing investment
and development of the greater Kierland area.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE; DESIGN
PRINCIPILE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development and
redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The Icon Kierland PUD proposes landscaping around the perimeter of the building. Shaded
detached sidewalks along Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road will provide thermal comfort
for pedestrians. The PUD requires that public pedestrian pathways be
shaded a minimum of 75 percent.
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; DESIGN PRINCIPLE:
Development should be designed to included convenient bicycle parking.
The proposed development will provide bicycle parking for both residents and guests. The
project also is adjacent to a shared use pathway along Kierland Boulevard and will support
tenants who prefer using alternative modes of transportation to get to work or nearby
entertainment.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Desert Ridge and Kierland Employment
Center – See background item No. 4
Tree and Shade Master Plan – See background item No. 6
Complete Streets Guiding Principles – See background item No. 7
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See background item No. 8
Housing Phoenix Plan – See background item No. 9
Zero Waste PHX – See background item No. 10
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
North (including across Marilyn
Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
Road)
South Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
Page 561
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
East (across Kierland Boulevard) Commercial office PUD
West Golf course GC PCD
Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone a 6.10-acre site located on the southwest corner of Kierland
Boulevard and Marilyn Road from CP/GCP PCD (Commerce Park/General
Commerce Park, Planned Community District) to PUD (Planned Unit Development)
to allow multifamily residential and commercial uses.
Aerial Zoning Map, Source: Planning and Development Department
2. The subject site consists of one parcel that currently contains one two-story office
building with surface parking. The subject site was annexed into the City of Phoenix
on October 15, 1961. At that time the subject site and the surrounding area vastly
consisted of vacant land. This area was planned in 1975 as a Planned Community
District (PCD) of 1,082 acres, previously known as the Desert Springs PCD and now
known as the Kierland PCD, through Rezoning Case No. Z-11-75. Subsequently, the
Kierland PCD went through several amendments since its original approval. The
Page 562
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
PCD Zoning District is intended to establish a development pattern for a larger area
while permitting flexibility for specific developments and safeguards that adequate
infrastructure needs are met for the area. The proposed PUD also proposes to
remove the property from the PCD, and the developer will be required to provide
updated infrastructure as needed and determined through the Planning and
Development Department’s site development process.
3. The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Industrial, thus the
proposal is not consistent with this General Plan Land Use Map designation. A
companion General Plan Amendment request (GPA-PV-4-21-2) proposes a Land Use
Map designation of Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre).
This Mixed Use designation will allow residential and commercial land uses the
flexibility to locate on any portion of the site in compliance with the PUD’s
development standards.
The General Plan Land Use Map designations on three sides of the subject parcel
are also Industrial. To the west, the General Plan Land Use Map designation is
Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned. To the northeast, the General Plan Land Use
Map designation is Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park / Residential
15+ dwelling units per acre.
General Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning and Development Department
4. The subject site is within the boundaries of the Maricopa Association of Governments
designated Desert Ridge/Kierland major employment center and in close proximity to
a City of Phoenix designated employment center.
Page 563
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
The Desert Ridge/Kierland employment center profile provided by the City of Phoenix
Community and Economic Development Department identifies the Kierland area as
being comprised of a highly educated, executive, and professional workforce with a
large inventory of Class A office space. Providing additional residential options in
close proximity to the nearby office spaces will add to the sustainability of the
established employment center and the Kierland area overall.
Employment Centers
Map, Source: City of
Phoenix Planning and
Development
Department
PROPOSAL
5. The proposal was developed utilizing the PUD zoning district. The PUD is intended
to create a built environment that is superior to that produced by conventional zoning
districts and design guidelines. Using a collaborative and comprehensive approach,
an applicant writes a document proposing standards and guidelines that are tailored
to the context of a site on a case by case basis.
Where the Icon Kierland PUD Development Narrative is silent on a requirement, the
applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions shall be applied.
List of Uses
The Development Narrative proposes several permitted uses. The proposed uses
consist of the permitted C-2 uses found in Sections 623 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance. Additionally, multifamily residential is permitted with a maximum of 319
residential dwelling units.
The Development Narrative also proposes restricting certain uses that are
inconsistent with the Narrative's vision of mixed-use pedestrian-oriented
Page 564
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
development such as auto title loan establishments, gas stations, and automobile
service stations.
Conceptual Site Plan
The development’s main access point is along Marilyn Road, with a secondary
access point along Kierland Boulevard. The proposal includes a five-story, 70-foot
tall multifamily building. The parking garage is wrapped by dwelling units, except
along the garage entry point. Two amenity courtyards are proposed and are reserved
as private common open space. Both street frontages will have an enhanced
streetscape with a minimum five-foot wide detached sidewalk, framed by landscape
areas that will include trees, shrubs, and live ground cover.
Site Plan, Source: Todd + Associates
Development Standards
The PUD development narrative proposes development standards based on the C-2
Zoning District. These standards vary from the C-2 standards in relation to height,
density, lot coverage, open space and building setbacks. All other development
standards are comparable.
Page 565
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
Maximum Residential Unit Count:
Maximum Dwellings 319 dwelling units
Maximum Density 52.30 dwelling units per gross acre
Minimum Lot Width/Depth No Minimum
Minimum Building Setbacks From Property Line
North (Including Marilyn Road) 20 feet
South (Interior property lines) 25 feet
East (Kierland Boulevard) 30 feet
West (Interior property line) 50 feet
Minimum Landscape Setbacks
North (Marilyn Road) 20 feet
North (Interior property line) 0 feet
South (Interior property lines) 5 feet
East (Kierland Boulevard) 30 feet
West (Interior property line) 50 feet
Maximum Building Height 70 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage 60 percent of total net site area
Common Area Minimum 20 percent of net site area
The proposed maximum height is 70 feet. The C-2 standards allow a maximum
height of 30 feet and up to 56 feet with a height waiver. Staff is supportive of the
additional height due to enhanced design elements, placement, and comparable
heights with other developments in the area. The lot coverage proposed for the
project is 60 percent, while the maximum lot coverage permitted in the C-2 zoning
district is 50 percent. However, additional common area (a minimum of 20 percent of
the net site area) is being provided, which exceeds the minimum of 5 percent of the
gross site area required for multifamily projects.
Conceptual East Building Elevation, Source: Todd + Associates
Page 566
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
The required common area
per the Zoning Ordinance
standards is 13,285 square
feet, while the common area
proposed is 59,173 square
feet. The proposed building
setbacks where adjacent to
non-residential zoning are a
minimum of 25 feet where 0
feet is the minimum distance
required in the C-2 zoning
district standards. A minimum
20 foot building setback is
proposed along Marylin Road,
while a 30 foot building
setback is proposed along Conceptual Open Space Plan, Source: Collaborative V
Kierland Boulevard, which are Design Studio Inc.
comparable to the C-2 zoning
district requirements.
Density Standards
Based on the size of the property, the C-2 zoning district would allow 88 dwelling
units, and up to 106 with a density bonus; or up to 318 units with a density waiver
and bonus points. A public hearing would be required for a density waiver. The
proposed density is of 319 dwelling units.
Landscape Standards
The PUD proposes
landscaping along all sides of
the building. The Development
Narrative includes increased
landscape setbacks adjacent
to the street frontages.
Landscape setbacks ranging
from 20 to 30 feet will be
provided along Kierland
Boulevard and Marilyn Road.
These areas will incorporate a
mixture of two-inch and three-
inch caliper trees in the
landscape areas and shall
utilize existing trees where
possible.
Conceptual Landscape Plan, Source: Collaborative V
Design Studio Inc.
Page 567
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
In addition to the trees, the developer shall install a minimum of five, five-gallon
drought tolerant shrubs per tree and achieve 75 percent live ground cover. The
streetscapes along 71st Street and Marilyn Road will include a minimum five-foot
wide detached sidewalk and a mixture of two-inch, 3-inch and 4-inch caliper trees
along the public rights-of-way, exceeding the minimum tree size requirements. The
landscaping will provide for a pedestrian-friendly environment with 75 percent shade
on all public sidewalks and 50 percent shade along the private pedestrian pathways.
The shade standard along public sidewalks exceeds the minimum requirements of
the Zoning Ordinance.
Staff recommends Stipulation Nos. 1.b. and 1.c. to clarify the landscape setback
standards along the north and south property lines, consistent with the proposed site
plan. Stipulation No. 1.e. is a technical correction to a typographical error.
Design Guidelines and Standards
The Development Narrative includes design standards that promote pedestrian
circulation on and around the site. The graphic below illustrates the proposed
pedestrian network for the site.
Pedestrian Circulation Plan, Source: Todd + Associates
Design standards ensure that the building facade will contain a minimum of 25
percent glazing, maximum of 45 percent stucco, and minimum of 30 percent other
materials as depicted in the graphic below. Each unit above the first floor will have at
minimum one private balcony per unit and first floor units along Kierland Boulevard
Page 568
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
will include a private patio. The building corner along the intersection of Kierland
Boulevard and Marylin Road shall incorporate building articulation and architectural
detailing that emphasizes the corner and is architecturally distinctive from the primary
building façade in order to provide visual interest, as depicted in the graphic below.
The final elevations and building plans submitted to the City will incorporate the
provisions outlined in the development narrative and shall follow the Design
Guidelines of Section 507.Tab A of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
Conceptual Building Corner Rendering, Source: Todd + Associates
The PUD Narrative includes standards that require the parking garage to be wrapped
by dwelling units to promote pedestrian orientation onto adjacent streets.
Furthermore, streetscape design standards will provide uniform perimeter design.
Lastly, several residential amenities are also provided, which are outlined further
below.
Parking Standards
The proposed vehicular parking of 1.50 spaces per dwelling unit is consistent with
the Zoning Ordinance requirements for one and two-bedroom units. However, this
standard proposes a reduction for three-bedroom units as the Zoning Ordinance
requires two parking spaces each.
Furthermore, the PUD proposes bicycle parking spaces in accordance with Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance which requires spaces to be provided at a
rate of 0.25 spaces per unit, and up to a maximum of 50 spaces. A minimum of eight
bicycle parking spaces shall be provided near the entrance to the development for
Page 569
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
visitors. Staff recommends Stipulation No. 1.d. to ensure that most of the parking
stalls provided within the development are located within the parking garage building
envelope, consistent with the proposed site plan.
Fences/Walls
All fences and walls will adhere to the Zoning Ordinance requirements per Section
703, per the development standards in the Narrative. In addition, all screen walls
shall include architectural detailing consistent or complementary to the building
facade.
Amenities
The PUD proposes amenities intended for use by residents and guests to include a
clubhouse and fitness center no less than 13,000 square feet. The following
amenities shall be provided within a pool courtyard:
• Swimming pool and spa
• Lounge area
• Shaded outdoor dining area and seating nodes
• Covered patio
• Barbeque grills
• Water and fire features
If an internal courtyard is provided on the second floor, it will include at least three of
the following at a minimum:
• Lounge deck
• Shaded outdoor dining area
• Seating nodes
• Barbecue grills
• Water feature
• Fire feature
• Pool and/or spa
Page 570
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
Shade
The proposed shade standards require a minimum of 75 percent shade cover be
provided over public sidewalks and 50 percent shade coverage over private
sidewalks. The required shade standards along public sidewalks exceed the Zoning
Ordinance requirements.
Lighting Plan
All lighting will be consistent with the standards of Section 704 (Environmental
Performance Standards) and Section 507 Tab. A of the Zoning Ordinance, and
Section 23-100 of the City Code. Furthermore, pedestrian lighting provided along
public and private sidewalks shall comply with the Walkable Urban Code standards
in Sections 1304.D and Section 1304.H.5 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
Signage
The proposed sign standards shall comply with Section 705 of the City of Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance and the adopted Kierland Comprehensive Sign Plan as amended.
Sustainability
The Development Narrative proposes several options to incorporate sustainability
principals including drought-tolerant landscaping, LED landscape and exterior
building lighting, and recycling receptacles. The project also proposes retaining
established trees where possible along adjacent streets, and the utilization of low
flow water fixtures.
Phasing
The project will be constructed in one phase.
Infrastructure
The development shall comply with City of Phoenix standards pertaining to
infrastructure. Staff recommends Stipulation No. 1.f. to clarify grading and drainage
requirements.
Comparative Zoning Standards
Staff recommends Stipulation No. 1.g. to replace CP/GCP standards with C-2
standards to be consistent with proposed uses and standards in the development
Narrative.
AREA PLANS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND INITIATIVES
6. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and
development process. In addition, a vision in the master plan is to raise awareness
by leading by example. The proposal includes shaded pedestrian walking paths,
Page 571
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
open space areas and greater planting standards than otherwise required by the City
of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
7. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding Principles.
The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an accessible,
safe, and connected transportation system to include all modes, such as bicycles,
pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. There are proposed detached sidewalks adjacent
to the public streets and pathways throughout the site which provides a safer and
more comfortable pedestrian experience.
8. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan also supports options for both short and
long-term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. The proposal requires bicycle parking spaces be provided on the site.
Bicycle racks shall consist of an inverted-U style or other decorative design and
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance.
9. Housing Phoenix Plan
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid population
growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000 new housing
units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a primary reason
why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development supports the Plan’s
goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by allowing up to 319
multifamily residential units and contributing to the variety of housing types in the
area.
10. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of recycling
containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use developments. The provision
of recycling is addressed in the PUD narrative. Recycling receptacles will be
provided in the refuse room.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
11. At the time the staff report was written, staff has received three letters of opposition
and one letter in support. Concerns include change in character of the area,
Page 572
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
oversaturation of multifamily residential in the area, blocking of views, lack of new
services and increased traffic. The letter of support referenced the development
standards as appropriate, including the proposed height, building setbacks, parking
standards and open space, among other standards.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
12. The Parks and Recreation Department requested that the shared use pathway along
Kierland Boulevard be preserved and maintained. This is addressed in the PUD
narrative.
13. The Street Transportation Department has proposed stipulations requiring that all
streets within and adjacent to the development, shall be constructed with all required
elements, including meeting ADA requirements. Furthermore, no preliminary
approval of plans shall be granted until a Traffic Impact Study is reviewed and
approved by the City. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 and 3.
14. The City of Phoenix Aviation Department has noted that the site is within the
Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) traffic pattern airspace, therefore, the developer
shall provide notice to prospective tenants or purchasers of the existence and
operation characteristics of the Scottsdale Airport and shall provide documentation
that Form 7460-1 from has been filed with the FAA. The requirements are addressed
in Stipulation Nos. 4 and 5.
15. The Phoenix Fire Department has noted that they do not anticipate any problems
with this case and that the site and/or buildings shall comply with the Phoenix Fire
Code.
16. The City of Phoenix Floodplain Management division of the Public Works
Department did not have any comments on this case.
17. The City of Phoenix Water Services Department has noted the property has existing
water and sewer mains that can potentially serve the proposed development.
However, there is potential need to up size existing water and sewer infrastructure
mains so that any remodels or new buildings will be able to meet domestic and fire
code requirements. Furthermore, the development maybe required to submit a water
and wastewater master plan as required for development within the Kierland area.
OTHER
18. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in the
event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all ground
disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the City of
Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to
properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 6.
Page 573
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
19. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by the
rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require the
form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 7.
20. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal actions
such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be required.
Findings
1. The proposed development is compatible with the existing land use pattern in the area
and is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed
Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre).
2. The proposed development contains enhanced standards that will result in a more
walkable, shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment. The development will provide
increased shade which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect.
3. The proposed development will provide additional housing options close to employers
in a designated Major Employment Center.
Stipulations
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Icon at Kierland PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The updated
Development Narrative shall be consistent with Development Narrative date stamped
April 4, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations.
a. Front Cover, add “City Council adopted: [Insert Adoption date]”
b. Page 9, Section D2.a., Landscape Setbacks (Minimum): Clarify landscape
setback standard along the north and south property lines to be consistent with
the proposed site plan by requiring a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape setback
along the south and a minimum 0-foot-wide landscape setback along the north
property line where not adjacent to a street.
c. Page 10, Section D2.d., Perimeter Property Lines – Not Adjacent to Public Right-
of-Way (North, South, and West Property Lines): Remove the reference to the
north property line as no landscape setback is provided here.
Page 574
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
d. Page 11, Section D3.b., Parking Standards, Automotive Parking Location,
Parking Location, Automotive: Modify the maximum number of parking spaces
along the main entry drive that are located outside of the garage building footprint
or building envelope to a maximum of five (5) spaces to be consistent with the
proposed site plan.
e. Page 17, Section E2. b., Uniform Perimeter Design: Modify the third bullet to
“Five (5) different accent species”.
f. Page 21, Section H.1, Infrastructure, Grading and Drainage: Replace the fourth
sentence as follows: Therefore, the subject site is not anticipated to provide any
supplemental retention onsite, and may be required to address “first flush”
stormwater treatment in accordance with the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Policies and Standards Manual, current edition.
g. Page 23, Section I., Comparative Zoning Standards Table: Replace CP/GCP
standards with C-2 standards.
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this development. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and
approved by the City.
3. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
4. The developer shall record a Notice to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport
in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of Scottsdale
Municipal Airport (SDL) to future owners or tenants of the property.
5. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to final site plan approval
that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the development
received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary equipment used
during construction exceeds the height of the permanent structure a separate Form
7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and a “No Hazard Determination” obtained
prior to the construction start date.
6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
Page 575
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
7. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
Writer
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
April 25, 2022
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Exhibits
Zoning Sketch Map
Zoning Aerial Map
Community Correspondence (7 pages)
Icon Kierland PUD Development Narrative date stamped April 4, 2022
Page 576
PUD * C-2 PCD *
Z-3-18 Z-66-97
GREENWAY PKWY
GC/PCD * RH SP PCD*
Z-11-C-75
Z-11-F-75
CP/GCP
CP/GCP PUD * PCD *
KIERLAND BLVD
Z-11-C-75
PCD * Z-63-20
Z-11-C-75
GC/PCD *
Z-11-F-75
R-3A PCD * MARILYN RD
71ST ST
Z-11-C-75
PUD *
Z-56-21
PUD *
Z-14-20
CP/GCP
PCD * CP/GCP
Z-11-C-75 PCD*
Z-48-91
ACOMA DR
R1-6 *
68TH ST
R1-10 *
PCD PCD 69TH ST R-3A
EVANS DR
Z-11-C-75 Z-48-91 PCD*
Z-48-91
I
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
Z-76-21
Miles UNION HILLS DR
A W P EA K PKWY (SR 51)
BELL RD
0.06 0.03 0 0.06
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE
GREENWAY RD
THUNDERBIRD RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 CACTUS RD
SCOTTSDALE RD
SHEA BLVD
QU
16TH ST 56TH ST 64TH ST
24TH ST S
TATUM BLVD
32ND ST
40TH ST
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Nick Wood, Esq.
FROM:
CP/GCP PCD ( 6.10 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
12/16/2021
Z-76-21 REVISION DATES:
4/13/2022
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
6.10 Acres QS 34-44 L-12 TO: PUD ( 6.10 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
CP/GCP PCD N/A N/A
PUD 319 N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-76-21.mxd
Page 577
PUD * C-2 PCD *
Z-3-18 Z-66-97
GREENWAY PKWY
GC/PCD * RH SP PCD*
Z-11-C-75
Z-11-F-75
CP/GCP
CP/GCP PUD * PCD *
KIERLAND BLVD
Z-11-C-75
PCD * Z-63-20
Z-11-C-75
GC/PCD *
Z-11-F-75
R-3A PCD * MARILYN RD
71ST ST
Z-11-C-75
PUD *
Z-56-21
PUD *
Z-14-20
CP/GCP
PCD * CP/GCP
Z-11-C-75 PCD*
Z-48-91
ACOMA DR
R1-6 *
68TH ST
R1-10 *
PCD PCD 69TH ST R-3A
EVANS DR
Z-11-C-75 Z-48-91 PCD*
Z-48-91
I
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
Z-76-21
Miles UNION HILLS DR
A W P EA K PKWY (SR 51)
BELL RD
0.06 0.03 0 0.06
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE
GREENWAY RD
THUNDERBIRD RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 CACTUS RD
SCOTTSDALE RD
SHEA BLVD
QU
16TH ST 56TH ST 64TH ST
24TH ST S
TATUM BLVD
32ND ST
40TH ST
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Nick Wood, Esq.
FROM:
CP/GCP PCD ( 6.10 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
12/16/2021
Z-76-21 REVISION DATES:
4/13/2022
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
6.10 Acres QS 34-44 L-12 TO: PUD ( 6.10 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
CP/GCP PCD N/A N/A
PUD 319 N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-76-21.mxd
Page 578
David O Simmons
From: David O Simmons
Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 9:15 AM
To: Randy Hein
Cc: Griemsmann, Noel; Moran, Taylor N.
Subject: RE: Comments on GPA-PV-4-21-2 & Z-76-21-2
Mr. Hein,
Thank you for reaching out in regard to Rezoning Case No. Z-76-21-2 and the companion case, GPA-PV-4-21-2. Your
comments have been saved to the case file to be included as part of the public record. I have also cc’d the applicants
representatives so they are aware of your concerns.
This case has not been scheduled for public hearings for recommendation. Hearing dates will not be provided until staff
has an acceptable copy of the applicants development narrative. PUD development narratives typically require 3 review
cycles. We are currently working on the 1st review cycle for this request. You may review the applicants development
narratives here: https://www.phoenix.gov/pdd/planning-zoning/pzservices/pud-cases Cases are filed by case number (Z-
76-21-2).
Once hearing dates have been provided and you wish to speak on an item, you may submit a request to speak to myself
at least 24 hours prior to the hearing. Please let us know if you have additional comments or concerns.
Respectfully,
David Simmons, MA
Paradise Valley & Deer Valley
Village Planner *II
200 West Washington Street
3rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
602-262-4072
david.simmons@phoenix.gov
From: Randy Hein
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 3:24 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Comments on GPA-PV-4-21-2 & Z-76-21-2
Hi David, the following are my concerns for the current plans on these two projects:
Cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 & Z-76-21-2
Page 579
I am concerned about the height the densities of the buildings. This effects our open air and views that are special and
unique to Phoenix and the West. I am use to the wide open spaces of the desert. That's what I found that was most
attractive the Phoenix and the Kierland area. I am also concerned about the amount of traffic that would be on Acoma
and Kierland blvd. The heights densities are way too much for this side of Greenway. We are in one story home about
two blocks away. The Optima buildings on 71st and Kierland Commons Block Tower already block out our view to the
mountains to the NE. Right now it's just a node, or clump of towers that we can at least see around. But if these towers
are too continue across Greenway and down Kierland Aveunue, this would create a giant wall or blockcade to almost all
of our mountain views to the East. I think Phoenix development, like the west should stay horizontal and protect the
views and sunsets etc. This would be good for everyone, not just the people in the higher towers. Don't close us in! You
don't know what you have until it's gone. Just walk by the Optima Buildings, If they were half as high would feel more
like Phoenix. Also, the new AC Hotel looks like it just landed there and is so out-of-place. If it were half the height it
would fit right in. The new apartment building on Scottsdale Road that replaced a fitness business is so overbuilt and
does not look like it belongs there. I feel sorry for the people that live to the west of it. I understand that Phoenix needs
more housing. We just don't need it all to be stacked up around one small area. Please do not overbuild this area. There
are only 6 blocks of downtown and it’s already getting too crowded. We used to wait 15 minutes for a table at a
restaurant, now it’s 60. It’s not just any one project that is effected this area. It is all of these new apartment projects.
There are really adding up to potentially 1500 to 2000 new apartments in about 4 square blocks. I am not opposed to
the new development. I am just opposed to the size of it. I think that currently we have a great life style here and would
like to keep it that way. Good planning and zoning should keep it that way! If all of them were cut down to half the
height and density, we could keep the look and feel of our neighborhood and keep Kierland special!
Randy Hein, 6753 E. Evans Drive, Phoenix, AZ
--
Randy Hein
Architect, AIA, NCARB
307.234.3601
randy@heinbond.com
www.heinbond.com [heinbond.com]
Page 580
David O Simmons
From: Joanne Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 11:20 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Icon Kierland (Case #GPA-PV-4-21-2)
I strongly oppose the change in zoning to build the ICON Kierland. The homes/condos adjacent to the proposed
property are no larger than two story, with the exception, down the road to Elite and Ascend Apartments. The project is
too large at six stories/370 units. We need jobs in this area – not more housing.
In addition to the size of the project, the roads (Acoma/Kierland) are already highly used as a pass-through between
Scottsdale Rd. and Greenway. Adding the amount of proposed units is oversaturating the traffic for the area.
More housing is not needed in this area; more traffic is not needed in this area. Do not make this “downtown
Phoenix”!!
Again, I strongly oppose the change in zoning. Please add this to the record and take this into consideration.
Thank you.
Joanne Thomas
Homeowner on Acoma
Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows
Page 581
David O Simmons
From: Donna Wilke
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 2:53 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Re: Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
Hi & thank you.
I will check out the sites.
I saw this yesterday and fear another big multiple family dwelling coming soon. It’s getting insane.
On Mar 1, 2022, at 9:22 AM, David O Simmons wrote:
Good morning Donna,
My name is David Simmons. I am the Paradise Valley Village Planner. The Village Planning Committee
does not have a formal newsletter. However, the Village does have a dedicated web page:
https://www.phoenix.gov/villages/Paradise-Valley The City of Phoenix also has a dedicated web page
(My Community Map) for development projects city wide. Please feel free to reach out to me directly in
the event you have inquiries about any site specific project within the village boundaries.
Page 582
Respectfully,
David Simmons, MA
Paradise Valley & Deer Valley
Village Planner *II
200 West Washington Street
3rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
602-262-4072
david.simmons@phoenix.gov
Page 583
From: James Wayne mailloux
To: Sarah Stockham
Cc: Nick Wood; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: RD ICON KIERLAND May 2, 2022 Village Planning Committee hearing, Case Nos. GPA-PV-4-21-2 & Z-76-21-2
Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 6:46:59 PM
I write you on behalf of the Kierland Community Alliance (KCA), regarding the
above case, and ask that you include this letter in the package for the Village
Planning Committee on May 2.
We, the KCA board, met with the representatives of RD Group including their
attorney Nick Wood, of Snell and Wilmer, several weeks ago to discuss their
proposed PUD and to review its impact on the Kierland community, located in the
area south of Greenway Parkway and west of Kierland Blvd.
Our interactions with the Rd Group representatives were detailed and positive. We
discussed in particular the impact on single family dwellings in the area. After
thorough review, we support this project as submitted, and we have no objections to
the project as presented.
Please note some of the key reasons why we support the submission:
6 stories and 70 feet in height, appropriate given the distances from single
family dwelling front yards. Had these distances been less, we would not
support the height which is planned.
Setbacks of 25 feet on the south side of the property, and distances of 560
feet+/- of the southwest corner of the building to the front of the furthest home
on the west and south side of East Acoma Rd., and
430 ft+/-from the from the closest home on the east and south side of East Acoma
Rd., at the intersection of N 69th street.
We also like the underground parking, and # of parking spots planned, which
exceed ordinance requirements; the 27% open space, which also exceeds
ordinance requirements, and 52.3 DU/AC, which is well within densities for
comparable projects north and south of Greenway Parkway within Kierland.
Additionally, the developer has generously agreed to donate $100,000 to the Parks
Foundation for the renovation of SandPiper park in the area, for the benefit of the
entire neighborhood.
We believe the RD Group have set a good example of responsible development in
Kierland, and their collaborative and positive engagement with us is responsive, in
Page 584
our opinion, to the needs of the neighborhood.
As you know, it is the KCA mission and vision to help produce positive outcomes
which consider and respond to the needs of existing residents as well as future
residents for all development and re-development in the Kierland neighborhood.
Thank you for your attention and consideration of this project when it comes before
you at the City Council.
Wayne Mailloux
Chairman,
Kierland Community Alliance
waynemailloux@me.com
Page 585
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-76-21-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting February 07, 2022
Request From CP/GCP PCD
Request To PUD
Location Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2 were heard concurrently.
Mr. Nick Wood, Representative with Snell & Wilmer, introduced himself and gave an
overview of both the GPA and Rezoning requests. He went over the need for housing
within an employment center, the consistency with the character of the surrounding area
and how this site will function with recently approved cases in the nearby area. Mr.
Wood also shard specific details about the site plan, elevations, open space areas and
traffic. He highlighted the setbacks proposed and frontage standards, which will activate
the street frontages and help to create a more pedestrian friendly environment. He
shared the shade study, which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect and
discussed the proposed perimeter landscape treatments, which will provide visual
interest.
VPC Discussion:
None
Public Comment:
None
Applicants Response:
None
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 586
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-76-21-2
Date of VPC Meeting May 2, 2022
Request From CP/GCP PCD
Request To PUD
Proposed Use Multifamily residential and commercial uses
Location Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 11-0 with committee members Balderrama, Goodhue,
Hall, Mazza, Petersen, Popovic, Schmidt, Severs,
Sparks, Wise, and Lesher in favor.
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2 were heard concurrently by the committee.
Chair Gubser and committee member Bowman left the meeting, bringing the quorum to
11 members.
Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a presentation on cases
GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2. Mr. Bojórquez discussed the location of the site, noting
the existing and proposed General Plan Land Use Map designations. Mr. Bojórquez
discussed the surrounding zoning and proposed land uses part of the PUD case. Mr.
Bojórquez discussed the location of the site within the Desert Ridge and Kierland
employment center and described how this project furthers other policy plans. Mr.
Bojórquez described the proposed site plan and building elevations, noting that a
maximum height of six stories and 70 feet would be permitted. Mr. Bojórquez noted that
that one letter of support and three letters in opposition had been received. Mr.
Bojórquez concluded the presentation by providing the staff findings and
recommendation of approval, describing the proposed stipulations for case Z-76-21-2,
as presented in the staff report.
Nick Wood, representing the applicant with Snell & Wilmer LLP, introduced himself and
his team. Mr. Wood discussed the location of the site in relation to other projects
approved in the area. Mr. Wood stated that this development is over 500 feet north of
the closest single-family home south of the site, adding that the Kierland Community
Alliance supports this project. Mr. Wood stated that the minor general plan amendment
case supports the removal of industrially-designated land on the site. Mr. Wood
compared the previous proposal with the current proposal, which show a decrease in
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 587
density and shifting of the building away from the west property line. Mr. Wood stated
that other changes made include the addition of patios along the street to activate this
area and two stories of underground parking below grade. Mr. Wood discussed the
proposed development standards, including proposed parking standards. Mr. Wood
discussed the proposed open space, building articulation designs and showed site
renderings. Mr. Wood concluded the presentation by requesting approval of cases
GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2.
Questions from the Committee:
Vice Chair Lesher asked if any committee members had questions for the presenters.
Jennifer Hall gave kudos to the applicant for the changes made and appreciates the
architecture provided in this project. This design goes above and beyond, plus it looks
classy.
Alex Popovic stated that a loss of 51 dwelling units from 370 to 319 is a big
compromise. Mr. Popovic appreciates the applicant’s collaboration with the community.
Public Comment:
None.
Applicant Response to Public Comment:
None.
Vice Chair Lesher asked for a motion on this item.
MOTION – Z-76-21-2:
Alan Sparks motioned to recommend approval of Z-71-21-2 per the staff
recommendation. Roy Wise seconded the motion.
VOTE – Z-76-21-2:
11-0; motion to approve passed with committee members Balderrama, Goodhue, Hall,
Mazza, Petersen, Popovic, Schmidt, Severs, Sparks, Wise, and Lesher in favor.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
No comments.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 588
Attachment E
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
June 2, 2022
ITEM NO: 5
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-76-21-2 (Icon Kierland PUD) (Companion Case GPA-PV-4-
21-2)
Location: Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road
From: CP/GCP PCD
To: PUD
Acreage: 6.10
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow multifamily residential and commercial
uses.
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Owner: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 2/7/2022 Information only
Paradise Valley 5/2/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 11-0.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee recommendation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Gaynor made a MOTION to approve Z-76-21-2, per the Paradise
Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Gaynor
Second: McCabe
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Howard and Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes (possibly in error)
Findings:
1. The proposed development is compatible with the existing land use pattern in the area
and is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed
Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre).
2. The proposed development contains enhanced standards that will result in a more
walkable, shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment. The development will provide
increased shade which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect.
3. The proposed development will provide additional housing options close to employers
in a designated Major Employment Center.
Page 589
Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Icon at Kierland PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning Department within 30
days of City Council approval of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall
be consistent with Development Narrative date stamped April 4, 2022, as modified by
the following stipulations.
a. Front Cover, add “City Council adopted: [Insert Adoption date]”
b. Page 9, Section D2.a., Landscape Setbacks (Minimum): Clarify landscape
setback standard along the north and south property lines to be consistent with
the proposed site plan by requiring a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape setback
along the south and a minimum 0-foot-wide landscape setback along the north
property line where not adjacent to a street.
c. Page 10, Section D2.d., Perimeter Property Lines – Not Adjacent to Public
Right-of-Way (North, South, and West Property Lines): Remove the reference to
the north property line as no landscape setback is provided here.
d. Page 11, Section D3.b., Parking Standards, Automotive Parking Location,
Parking Location, Automotive: Modify the maximum number of parking spaces
along the main entry drive that are located outside of the garage building
footprint or building envelope to a maximum of five (5) spaces to be consistent
with the proposed site plan.
e. Page 17, Section E2. b., Uniform Perimeter Design: Modify the third bullet to
“Five (5) different accent species”.
f. Page 21, Section H.1, Infrastructure, Grading and Drainage: Replace the fourth
sentence as follows: Therefore, the subject site is not anticipated to provide any
supplemental retention onsite, and may be required to address “first flush”
stormwater treatment in accordance with the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Policies and Standards Manual, current edition.
g. Page 23, Section I., Comparative Zoning Standards Table: Replace CP/GCP
standards with C-2 standards.
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this development. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and approved
by the City.
3. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping,
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
4. The developer shall record a Notice to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport
in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of Scottsdale
Municipal Airport (SDL) to future owners or tenants of the property.
5. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to final site plan approval
that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the development
received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary equipment used
Page 590
during construction exceeds the height of the permanent structure a separate Form
7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and a “No Hazard Determination” obtained prior
to the construction start date.
6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
7. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 591
Report
Kierland PUD) - Southwest Corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road
(Ordinance G-7007)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-76-21-
2 and rezone the site from CP/GCP PCD (Commerce Park District / General
Commerce Park Option, Planned Community District) to PUD (Planned Unit
Development) to allow multifamily residential and commercial uses. This is a
companion case to GPA-PV-4-21-2 and must be heard following GPA-PV-4-21-2.
Summary
Current Zoning: CP/GCP PCD
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 6.10 acres
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow multifamily residential and commercial
uses.
Owner: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on Feb. 7,
2022, for information only.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on May
2, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 11-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 14646 N. Kierland Blvd. and 6901 E. Marilyn Road.
Page 552
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 553
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-76-21-2) FROM CP/GCP PCD (COMMERCE
PARK DISTRICT / GENERAL COMMERCE PARK OPTION,
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 6.10-acre property located at the southwest
corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road in a portion of Section 10, Township 3
North, Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed
from “CP/GCP PCD” (Commerce Park District / General Commerce Park Option,
Planned Community District) to “PUD” (Planned Unit Development).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
Page 554
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Icon at Kierland PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with Development Narrative
date stamped April 4, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations.
a. Front Cover, add “City Council adopted: [Insert Adoption date]”
b. Page 9, Section D2.a., Landscape Setbacks (Minimum): Clarify
landscape setback standard along the north and south property lines to
be consistent with the proposed site plan by requiring a minimum 5-foot-
wide landscape setback along the south and a minimum 0-foot-wide
landscape setback along the north property line where not adjacent to a
street.
c. Page 10, Section D2.d., Perimeter Property Lines – Not Adjacent to
Public Right-of-Way (North, South, and West Property Lines): Remove
the reference to the north property line as no landscape setback is
provided here.
d. Page 11, Section D3.b., Parking Standards, Automotive Parking
Location, Parking Location, Automotive: Modify the maximum number of
parking spaces along the main entry drive that are located outside of the
garage building footprint or building envelope to a maximum of five (5)
spaces to be consistent with the proposed site plan.
e. Page 17, Section E2. b., Uniform Perimeter Design: Modify the third
bullet to “Five (5) different accent species”.
f. Page 21, Section H.1, Infrastructure, Grading and Drainage: Replace the
fourth sentence as follows: Therefore, the subject site is not anticipated
to provide any supplemental retention onsite, and may be required to
address “first flush” stormwater treatment in accordance with the City of
Phoenix Storm Water Policies and Standards Manual, current edition.
g. Page 23, Section I., Comparative Zoning Standards Table: Replace
CP/GCP standards with C-2 standards.
Page 555
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City.
3. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
4. The developer shall record a Notice to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to
Airport in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of
Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future owners or tenants of the property.
5. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to final site plan
approval that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the
development received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary
equipment used during construction exceeds the height of the permanent
structure a separate Form 7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and a “No
Hazard Determination” obtained prior to the construction start date.
6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
7. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
Page 556
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 557
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-76-21-2
A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 4
EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL 5B-2, KIERLAND PARCELS 5B-1 AND 5B-2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
RECORDED IN BOOK 431 OF MAPS, PAGE 8, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA.
Page 558
Page 559
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-76-21-2
Icon Kierland PUD
April 25, 2022
Paradise Valley Village Planning May 2, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 2, 2022
Request From: CP/GCP PCD (6.10 acres)
Request To: PUD (6.10 acres)
Proposed Use: Planned Unit Development to allow multifamily
residential and commercial uses
Location: Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and
Marilyn Road
Owners: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
Current: Industrial
General Plan Land Use Map Designation Proposed (GPA-PV-4-21-2): Mixed Use
(Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units
per acre)
Collector Width varies from 40-foot to 35-
Kierland Boulevard
Street foot west half street
Street Map
Classification Local
Marilyn Road 30-foot south half street
Street
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Promote and encourage compatible development and redevelopment
with a mix of housing types in neighborhoods close to employment centers,
commercial areas, and where transit or transportation alternatives exist.
The Icon Kierland Planned Unit Development (PUD) proposes multifamily and commercial
uses that are compatible in scale and intensity with the surrounding Kierland area and
properties adjacent to the site. The development is in a mixed-use corridor where nearby
Page 560
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
properties are multifamily or commercial. The project site is also within a designated
employment center, thus the concentration of residential uses in this commercial area will
promote new and existing businesses. The requested PUD will facilitate ongoing investment
and development of the greater Kierland area.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE; DESIGN
PRINCIPILE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development and
redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The Icon Kierland PUD proposes landscaping around the perimeter of the building. Shaded
detached sidewalks along Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road will provide thermal comfort
for pedestrians. The PUD requires that public pedestrian pathways be
shaded a minimum of 75 percent.
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; DESIGN PRINCIPLE:
Development should be designed to included convenient bicycle parking.
The proposed development will provide bicycle parking for both residents and guests. The
project also is adjacent to a shared use pathway along Kierland Boulevard and will support
tenants who prefer using alternative modes of transportation to get to work or nearby
entertainment.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Desert Ridge and Kierland Employment
Center – See background item No. 4
Tree and Shade Master Plan – See background item No. 6
Complete Streets Guiding Principles – See background item No. 7
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See background item No. 8
Housing Phoenix Plan – See background item No. 9
Zero Waste PHX – See background item No. 10
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
North (including across Marilyn
Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
Road)
South Commercial office CP/GCP PCD
Page 561
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
East (across Kierland Boulevard) Commercial office PUD
West Golf course GC PCD
Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone a 6.10-acre site located on the southwest corner of Kierland
Boulevard and Marilyn Road from CP/GCP PCD (Commerce Park/General
Commerce Park, Planned Community District) to PUD (Planned Unit Development)
to allow multifamily residential and commercial uses.
Aerial Zoning Map, Source: Planning and Development Department
2. The subject site consists of one parcel that currently contains one two-story office
building with surface parking. The subject site was annexed into the City of Phoenix
on October 15, 1961. At that time the subject site and the surrounding area vastly
consisted of vacant land. This area was planned in 1975 as a Planned Community
District (PCD) of 1,082 acres, previously known as the Desert Springs PCD and now
known as the Kierland PCD, through Rezoning Case No. Z-11-75. Subsequently, the
Kierland PCD went through several amendments since its original approval. The
Page 562
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
PCD Zoning District is intended to establish a development pattern for a larger area
while permitting flexibility for specific developments and safeguards that adequate
infrastructure needs are met for the area. The proposed PUD also proposes to
remove the property from the PCD, and the developer will be required to provide
updated infrastructure as needed and determined through the Planning and
Development Department’s site development process.
3. The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Industrial, thus the
proposal is not consistent with this General Plan Land Use Map designation. A
companion General Plan Amendment request (GPA-PV-4-21-2) proposes a Land Use
Map designation of Mixed Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre).
This Mixed Use designation will allow residential and commercial land uses the
flexibility to locate on any portion of the site in compliance with the PUD’s
development standards.
The General Plan Land Use Map designations on three sides of the subject parcel
are also Industrial. To the west, the General Plan Land Use Map designation is
Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned. To the northeast, the General Plan Land Use
Map designation is Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park / Residential
15+ dwelling units per acre.
General Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning and Development Department
4. The subject site is within the boundaries of the Maricopa Association of Governments
designated Desert Ridge/Kierland major employment center and in close proximity to
a City of Phoenix designated employment center.
Page 563
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
The Desert Ridge/Kierland employment center profile provided by the City of Phoenix
Community and Economic Development Department identifies the Kierland area as
being comprised of a highly educated, executive, and professional workforce with a
large inventory of Class A office space. Providing additional residential options in
close proximity to the nearby office spaces will add to the sustainability of the
established employment center and the Kierland area overall.
Employment Centers
Map, Source: City of
Phoenix Planning and
Development
Department
PROPOSAL
5. The proposal was developed utilizing the PUD zoning district. The PUD is intended
to create a built environment that is superior to that produced by conventional zoning
districts and design guidelines. Using a collaborative and comprehensive approach,
an applicant writes a document proposing standards and guidelines that are tailored
to the context of a site on a case by case basis.
Where the Icon Kierland PUD Development Narrative is silent on a requirement, the
applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions shall be applied.
List of Uses
The Development Narrative proposes several permitted uses. The proposed uses
consist of the permitted C-2 uses found in Sections 623 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance. Additionally, multifamily residential is permitted with a maximum of 319
residential dwelling units.
The Development Narrative also proposes restricting certain uses that are
inconsistent with the Narrative's vision of mixed-use pedestrian-oriented
Page 564
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
development such as auto title loan establishments, gas stations, and automobile
service stations.
Conceptual Site Plan
The development’s main access point is along Marilyn Road, with a secondary
access point along Kierland Boulevard. The proposal includes a five-story, 70-foot
tall multifamily building. The parking garage is wrapped by dwelling units, except
along the garage entry point. Two amenity courtyards are proposed and are reserved
as private common open space. Both street frontages will have an enhanced
streetscape with a minimum five-foot wide detached sidewalk, framed by landscape
areas that will include trees, shrubs, and live ground cover.
Site Plan, Source: Todd + Associates
Development Standards
The PUD development narrative proposes development standards based on the C-2
Zoning District. These standards vary from the C-2 standards in relation to height,
density, lot coverage, open space and building setbacks. All other development
standards are comparable.
Page 565
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
Maximum Residential Unit Count:
Maximum Dwellings 319 dwelling units
Maximum Density 52.30 dwelling units per gross acre
Minimum Lot Width/Depth No Minimum
Minimum Building Setbacks From Property Line
North (Including Marilyn Road) 20 feet
South (Interior property lines) 25 feet
East (Kierland Boulevard) 30 feet
West (Interior property line) 50 feet
Minimum Landscape Setbacks
North (Marilyn Road) 20 feet
North (Interior property line) 0 feet
South (Interior property lines) 5 feet
East (Kierland Boulevard) 30 feet
West (Interior property line) 50 feet
Maximum Building Height 70 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage 60 percent of total net site area
Common Area Minimum 20 percent of net site area
The proposed maximum height is 70 feet. The C-2 standards allow a maximum
height of 30 feet and up to 56 feet with a height waiver. Staff is supportive of the
additional height due to enhanced design elements, placement, and comparable
heights with other developments in the area. The lot coverage proposed for the
project is 60 percent, while the maximum lot coverage permitted in the C-2 zoning
district is 50 percent. However, additional common area (a minimum of 20 percent of
the net site area) is being provided, which exceeds the minimum of 5 percent of the
gross site area required for multifamily projects.
Conceptual East Building Elevation, Source: Todd + Associates
Page 566
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
The required common area
per the Zoning Ordinance
standards is 13,285 square
feet, while the common area
proposed is 59,173 square
feet. The proposed building
setbacks where adjacent to
non-residential zoning are a
minimum of 25 feet where 0
feet is the minimum distance
required in the C-2 zoning
district standards. A minimum
20 foot building setback is
proposed along Marylin Road,
while a 30 foot building
setback is proposed along Conceptual Open Space Plan, Source: Collaborative V
Kierland Boulevard, which are Design Studio Inc.
comparable to the C-2 zoning
district requirements.
Density Standards
Based on the size of the property, the C-2 zoning district would allow 88 dwelling
units, and up to 106 with a density bonus; or up to 318 units with a density waiver
and bonus points. A public hearing would be required for a density waiver. The
proposed density is of 319 dwelling units.
Landscape Standards
The PUD proposes
landscaping along all sides of
the building. The Development
Narrative includes increased
landscape setbacks adjacent
to the street frontages.
Landscape setbacks ranging
from 20 to 30 feet will be
provided along Kierland
Boulevard and Marilyn Road.
These areas will incorporate a
mixture of two-inch and three-
inch caliper trees in the
landscape areas and shall
utilize existing trees where
possible.
Conceptual Landscape Plan, Source: Collaborative V
Design Studio Inc.
Page 567
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
In addition to the trees, the developer shall install a minimum of five, five-gallon
drought tolerant shrubs per tree and achieve 75 percent live ground cover. The
streetscapes along 71st Street and Marilyn Road will include a minimum five-foot
wide detached sidewalk and a mixture of two-inch, 3-inch and 4-inch caliper trees
along the public rights-of-way, exceeding the minimum tree size requirements. The
landscaping will provide for a pedestrian-friendly environment with 75 percent shade
on all public sidewalks and 50 percent shade along the private pedestrian pathways.
The shade standard along public sidewalks exceeds the minimum requirements of
the Zoning Ordinance.
Staff recommends Stipulation Nos. 1.b. and 1.c. to clarify the landscape setback
standards along the north and south property lines, consistent with the proposed site
plan. Stipulation No. 1.e. is a technical correction to a typographical error.
Design Guidelines and Standards
The Development Narrative includes design standards that promote pedestrian
circulation on and around the site. The graphic below illustrates the proposed
pedestrian network for the site.
Pedestrian Circulation Plan, Source: Todd + Associates
Design standards ensure that the building facade will contain a minimum of 25
percent glazing, maximum of 45 percent stucco, and minimum of 30 percent other
materials as depicted in the graphic below. Each unit above the first floor will have at
minimum one private balcony per unit and first floor units along Kierland Boulevard
Page 568
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
will include a private patio. The building corner along the intersection of Kierland
Boulevard and Marylin Road shall incorporate building articulation and architectural
detailing that emphasizes the corner and is architecturally distinctive from the primary
building façade in order to provide visual interest, as depicted in the graphic below.
The final elevations and building plans submitted to the City will incorporate the
provisions outlined in the development narrative and shall follow the Design
Guidelines of Section 507.Tab A of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
Conceptual Building Corner Rendering, Source: Todd + Associates
The PUD Narrative includes standards that require the parking garage to be wrapped
by dwelling units to promote pedestrian orientation onto adjacent streets.
Furthermore, streetscape design standards will provide uniform perimeter design.
Lastly, several residential amenities are also provided, which are outlined further
below.
Parking Standards
The proposed vehicular parking of 1.50 spaces per dwelling unit is consistent with
the Zoning Ordinance requirements for one and two-bedroom units. However, this
standard proposes a reduction for three-bedroom units as the Zoning Ordinance
requires two parking spaces each.
Furthermore, the PUD proposes bicycle parking spaces in accordance with Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance which requires spaces to be provided at a
rate of 0.25 spaces per unit, and up to a maximum of 50 spaces. A minimum of eight
bicycle parking spaces shall be provided near the entrance to the development for
Page 569
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
visitors. Staff recommends Stipulation No. 1.d. to ensure that most of the parking
stalls provided within the development are located within the parking garage building
envelope, consistent with the proposed site plan.
Fences/Walls
All fences and walls will adhere to the Zoning Ordinance requirements per Section
703, per the development standards in the Narrative. In addition, all screen walls
shall include architectural detailing consistent or complementary to the building
facade.
Amenities
The PUD proposes amenities intended for use by residents and guests to include a
clubhouse and fitness center no less than 13,000 square feet. The following
amenities shall be provided within a pool courtyard:
• Swimming pool and spa
• Lounge area
• Shaded outdoor dining area and seating nodes
• Covered patio
• Barbeque grills
• Water and fire features
If an internal courtyard is provided on the second floor, it will include at least three of
the following at a minimum:
• Lounge deck
• Shaded outdoor dining area
• Seating nodes
• Barbecue grills
• Water feature
• Fire feature
• Pool and/or spa
Page 570
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
Shade
The proposed shade standards require a minimum of 75 percent shade cover be
provided over public sidewalks and 50 percent shade coverage over private
sidewalks. The required shade standards along public sidewalks exceed the Zoning
Ordinance requirements.
Lighting Plan
All lighting will be consistent with the standards of Section 704 (Environmental
Performance Standards) and Section 507 Tab. A of the Zoning Ordinance, and
Section 23-100 of the City Code. Furthermore, pedestrian lighting provided along
public and private sidewalks shall comply with the Walkable Urban Code standards
in Sections 1304.D and Section 1304.H.5 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
Signage
The proposed sign standards shall comply with Section 705 of the City of Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance and the adopted Kierland Comprehensive Sign Plan as amended.
Sustainability
The Development Narrative proposes several options to incorporate sustainability
principals including drought-tolerant landscaping, LED landscape and exterior
building lighting, and recycling receptacles. The project also proposes retaining
established trees where possible along adjacent streets, and the utilization of low
flow water fixtures.
Phasing
The project will be constructed in one phase.
Infrastructure
The development shall comply with City of Phoenix standards pertaining to
infrastructure. Staff recommends Stipulation No. 1.f. to clarify grading and drainage
requirements.
Comparative Zoning Standards
Staff recommends Stipulation No. 1.g. to replace CP/GCP standards with C-2
standards to be consistent with proposed uses and standards in the development
Narrative.
AREA PLANS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND INITIATIVES
6. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and
development process. In addition, a vision in the master plan is to raise awareness
by leading by example. The proposal includes shaded pedestrian walking paths,
Page 571
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
open space areas and greater planting standards than otherwise required by the City
of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
7. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding Principles.
The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an accessible,
safe, and connected transportation system to include all modes, such as bicycles,
pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. There are proposed detached sidewalks adjacent
to the public streets and pathways throughout the site which provides a safer and
more comfortable pedestrian experience.
8. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan also supports options for both short and
long-term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. The proposal requires bicycle parking spaces be provided on the site.
Bicycle racks shall consist of an inverted-U style or other decorative design and
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance.
9. Housing Phoenix Plan
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid population
growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000 new housing
units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a primary reason
why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development supports the Plan’s
goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by allowing up to 319
multifamily residential units and contributing to the variety of housing types in the
area.
10. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of recycling
containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use developments. The provision
of recycling is addressed in the PUD narrative. Recycling receptacles will be
provided in the refuse room.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
11. At the time the staff report was written, staff has received three letters of opposition
and one letter in support. Concerns include change in character of the area,
Page 572
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
oversaturation of multifamily residential in the area, blocking of views, lack of new
services and increased traffic. The letter of support referenced the development
standards as appropriate, including the proposed height, building setbacks, parking
standards and open space, among other standards.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
12. The Parks and Recreation Department requested that the shared use pathway along
Kierland Boulevard be preserved and maintained. This is addressed in the PUD
narrative.
13. The Street Transportation Department has proposed stipulations requiring that all
streets within and adjacent to the development, shall be constructed with all required
elements, including meeting ADA requirements. Furthermore, no preliminary
approval of plans shall be granted until a Traffic Impact Study is reviewed and
approved by the City. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 and 3.
14. The City of Phoenix Aviation Department has noted that the site is within the
Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) traffic pattern airspace, therefore, the developer
shall provide notice to prospective tenants or purchasers of the existence and
operation characteristics of the Scottsdale Airport and shall provide documentation
that Form 7460-1 from has been filed with the FAA. The requirements are addressed
in Stipulation Nos. 4 and 5.
15. The Phoenix Fire Department has noted that they do not anticipate any problems
with this case and that the site and/or buildings shall comply with the Phoenix Fire
Code.
16. The City of Phoenix Floodplain Management division of the Public Works
Department did not have any comments on this case.
17. The City of Phoenix Water Services Department has noted the property has existing
water and sewer mains that can potentially serve the proposed development.
However, there is potential need to up size existing water and sewer infrastructure
mains so that any remodels or new buildings will be able to meet domestic and fire
code requirements. Furthermore, the development maybe required to submit a water
and wastewater master plan as required for development within the Kierland area.
OTHER
18. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in the
event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all ground
disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the City of
Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to
properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 6.
Page 573
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
19. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by the
rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require the
form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 7.
20. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal actions
such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be required.
Findings
1. The proposed development is compatible with the existing land use pattern in the area
and is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed
Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre).
2. The proposed development contains enhanced standards that will result in a more
walkable, shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment. The development will provide
increased shade which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect.
3. The proposed development will provide additional housing options close to employers
in a designated Major Employment Center.
Stipulations
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Icon at Kierland PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The updated
Development Narrative shall be consistent with Development Narrative date stamped
April 4, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations.
a. Front Cover, add “City Council adopted: [Insert Adoption date]”
b. Page 9, Section D2.a., Landscape Setbacks (Minimum): Clarify landscape
setback standard along the north and south property lines to be consistent with
the proposed site plan by requiring a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape setback
along the south and a minimum 0-foot-wide landscape setback along the north
property line where not adjacent to a street.
c. Page 10, Section D2.d., Perimeter Property Lines – Not Adjacent to Public Right-
of-Way (North, South, and West Property Lines): Remove the reference to the
north property line as no landscape setback is provided here.
Page 574
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
d. Page 11, Section D3.b., Parking Standards, Automotive Parking Location,
Parking Location, Automotive: Modify the maximum number of parking spaces
along the main entry drive that are located outside of the garage building footprint
or building envelope to a maximum of five (5) spaces to be consistent with the
proposed site plan.
e. Page 17, Section E2. b., Uniform Perimeter Design: Modify the third bullet to
“Five (5) different accent species”.
f. Page 21, Section H.1, Infrastructure, Grading and Drainage: Replace the fourth
sentence as follows: Therefore, the subject site is not anticipated to provide any
supplemental retention onsite, and may be required to address “first flush”
stormwater treatment in accordance with the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Policies and Standards Manual, current edition.
g. Page 23, Section I., Comparative Zoning Standards Table: Replace CP/GCP
standards with C-2 standards.
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this development. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and
approved by the City.
3. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
4. The developer shall record a Notice to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport
in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of Scottsdale
Municipal Airport (SDL) to future owners or tenants of the property.
5. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to final site plan approval
that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the development
received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary equipment used
during construction exceeds the height of the permanent structure a separate Form
7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and a “No Hazard Determination” obtained
prior to the construction start date.
6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
Page 575
Staff Report: Z-76-21-2
April 25, 2022
7. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
Writer
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
April 25, 2022
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Exhibits
Zoning Sketch Map
Zoning Aerial Map
Community Correspondence (7 pages)
Icon Kierland PUD Development Narrative date stamped April 4, 2022
Page 576
PUD * C-2 PCD *
Z-3-18 Z-66-97
GREENWAY PKWY
GC/PCD * RH SP PCD*
Z-11-C-75
Z-11-F-75
CP/GCP
CP/GCP PUD * PCD *
KIERLAND BLVD
Z-11-C-75
PCD * Z-63-20
Z-11-C-75
GC/PCD *
Z-11-F-75
R-3A PCD * MARILYN RD
71ST ST
Z-11-C-75
PUD *
Z-56-21
PUD *
Z-14-20
CP/GCP
PCD * CP/GCP
Z-11-C-75 PCD*
Z-48-91
ACOMA DR
R1-6 *
68TH ST
R1-10 *
PCD PCD 69TH ST R-3A
EVANS DR
Z-11-C-75 Z-48-91 PCD*
Z-48-91
I
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
Z-76-21
Miles UNION HILLS DR
A W P EA K PKWY (SR 51)
BELL RD
0.06 0.03 0 0.06
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE
GREENWAY RD
THUNDERBIRD RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 CACTUS RD
SCOTTSDALE RD
SHEA BLVD
QU
16TH ST 56TH ST 64TH ST
24TH ST S
TATUM BLVD
32ND ST
40TH ST
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Nick Wood, Esq.
FROM:
CP/GCP PCD ( 6.10 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
12/16/2021
Z-76-21 REVISION DATES:
4/13/2022
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
6.10 Acres QS 34-44 L-12 TO: PUD ( 6.10 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
CP/GCP PCD N/A N/A
PUD 319 N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-76-21.mxd
Page 577
PUD * C-2 PCD *
Z-3-18 Z-66-97
GREENWAY PKWY
GC/PCD * RH SP PCD*
Z-11-C-75
Z-11-F-75
CP/GCP
CP/GCP PUD * PCD *
KIERLAND BLVD
Z-11-C-75
PCD * Z-63-20
Z-11-C-75
GC/PCD *
Z-11-F-75
R-3A PCD * MARILYN RD
71ST ST
Z-11-C-75
PUD *
Z-56-21
PUD *
Z-14-20
CP/GCP
PCD * CP/GCP
Z-11-C-75 PCD*
Z-48-91
ACOMA DR
R1-6 *
68TH ST
R1-10 *
PCD PCD 69TH ST R-3A
EVANS DR
Z-11-C-75 Z-48-91 PCD*
Z-48-91
I
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
Z-76-21
Miles UNION HILLS DR
A W P EA K PKWY (SR 51)
BELL RD
0.06 0.03 0 0.06
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE
GREENWAY RD
THUNDERBIRD RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 CACTUS RD
SCOTTSDALE RD
SHEA BLVD
QU
16TH ST 56TH ST 64TH ST
24TH ST S
TATUM BLVD
32ND ST
40TH ST
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Nick Wood, Esq.
FROM:
CP/GCP PCD ( 6.10 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
12/16/2021
Z-76-21 REVISION DATES:
4/13/2022
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
6.10 Acres QS 34-44 L-12 TO: PUD ( 6.10 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
CP/GCP PCD N/A N/A
PUD 319 N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-76-21.mxd
Page 578
David O Simmons
From: David O Simmons
Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 9:15 AM
To: Randy Hein
Cc: Griemsmann, Noel; Moran, Taylor N.
Subject: RE: Comments on GPA-PV-4-21-2 & Z-76-21-2
Mr. Hein,
Thank you for reaching out in regard to Rezoning Case No. Z-76-21-2 and the companion case, GPA-PV-4-21-2. Your
comments have been saved to the case file to be included as part of the public record. I have also cc’d the applicants
representatives so they are aware of your concerns.
This case has not been scheduled for public hearings for recommendation. Hearing dates will not be provided until staff
has an acceptable copy of the applicants development narrative. PUD development narratives typically require 3 review
cycles. We are currently working on the 1st review cycle for this request. You may review the applicants development
narratives here: https://www.phoenix.gov/pdd/planning-zoning/pzservices/pud-cases Cases are filed by case number (Z-
76-21-2).
Once hearing dates have been provided and you wish to speak on an item, you may submit a request to speak to myself
at least 24 hours prior to the hearing. Please let us know if you have additional comments or concerns.
Respectfully,
David Simmons, MA
Paradise Valley & Deer Valley
Village Planner *II
200 West Washington Street
3rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
602-262-4072
david.simmons@phoenix.gov
From: Randy Hein
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 3:24 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Comments on GPA-PV-4-21-2 & Z-76-21-2
Hi David, the following are my concerns for the current plans on these two projects:
Cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 & Z-76-21-2
Page 579
I am concerned about the height the densities of the buildings. This effects our open air and views that are special and
unique to Phoenix and the West. I am use to the wide open spaces of the desert. That's what I found that was most
attractive the Phoenix and the Kierland area. I am also concerned about the amount of traffic that would be on Acoma
and Kierland blvd. The heights densities are way too much for this side of Greenway. We are in one story home about
two blocks away. The Optima buildings on 71st and Kierland Commons Block Tower already block out our view to the
mountains to the NE. Right now it's just a node, or clump of towers that we can at least see around. But if these towers
are too continue across Greenway and down Kierland Aveunue, this would create a giant wall or blockcade to almost all
of our mountain views to the East. I think Phoenix development, like the west should stay horizontal and protect the
views and sunsets etc. This would be good for everyone, not just the people in the higher towers. Don't close us in! You
don't know what you have until it's gone. Just walk by the Optima Buildings, If they were half as high would feel more
like Phoenix. Also, the new AC Hotel looks like it just landed there and is so out-of-place. If it were half the height it
would fit right in. The new apartment building on Scottsdale Road that replaced a fitness business is so overbuilt and
does not look like it belongs there. I feel sorry for the people that live to the west of it. I understand that Phoenix needs
more housing. We just don't need it all to be stacked up around one small area. Please do not overbuild this area. There
are only 6 blocks of downtown and it’s already getting too crowded. We used to wait 15 minutes for a table at a
restaurant, now it’s 60. It’s not just any one project that is effected this area. It is all of these new apartment projects.
There are really adding up to potentially 1500 to 2000 new apartments in about 4 square blocks. I am not opposed to
the new development. I am just opposed to the size of it. I think that currently we have a great life style here and would
like to keep it that way. Good planning and zoning should keep it that way! If all of them were cut down to half the
height and density, we could keep the look and feel of our neighborhood and keep Kierland special!
Randy Hein, 6753 E. Evans Drive, Phoenix, AZ
--
Randy Hein
Architect, AIA, NCARB
307.234.3601
randy@heinbond.com
www.heinbond.com [heinbond.com]
Page 580
David O Simmons
From: Joanne Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 11:20 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Icon Kierland (Case #GPA-PV-4-21-2)
I strongly oppose the change in zoning to build the ICON Kierland. The homes/condos adjacent to the proposed
property are no larger than two story, with the exception, down the road to Elite and Ascend Apartments. The project is
too large at six stories/370 units. We need jobs in this area – not more housing.
In addition to the size of the project, the roads (Acoma/Kierland) are already highly used as a pass-through between
Scottsdale Rd. and Greenway. Adding the amount of proposed units is oversaturating the traffic for the area.
More housing is not needed in this area; more traffic is not needed in this area. Do not make this “downtown
Phoenix”!!
Again, I strongly oppose the change in zoning. Please add this to the record and take this into consideration.
Thank you.
Joanne Thomas
Homeowner on Acoma
Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows
Page 581
David O Simmons
From: Donna Wilke
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 2:53 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Re: Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
Hi & thank you.
I will check out the sites.
I saw this yesterday and fear another big multiple family dwelling coming soon. It’s getting insane.
On Mar 1, 2022, at 9:22 AM, David O Simmons
Good morning Donna,
My name is David Simmons. I am the Paradise Valley Village Planner. The Village Planning Committee
does not have a formal newsletter. However, the Village does have a dedicated web page:
https://www.phoenix.gov/villages/Paradise-Valley The City of Phoenix also has a dedicated web page
(My Community Map) for development projects city wide. Please feel free to reach out to me directly in
the event you have inquiries about any site specific project within the village boundaries.
Page 582
Respectfully,
David Simmons, MA
Paradise Valley & Deer Valley
Village Planner *II
200 West Washington Street
3rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
602-262-4072
david.simmons@phoenix.gov
Page 583
From: James Wayne mailloux
To: Sarah Stockham
Cc: Nick Wood; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: RD ICON KIERLAND May 2, 2022 Village Planning Committee hearing, Case Nos. GPA-PV-4-21-2 & Z-76-21-2
Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 6:46:59 PM
I write you on behalf of the Kierland Community Alliance (KCA), regarding the
above case, and ask that you include this letter in the package for the Village
Planning Committee on May 2.
We, the KCA board, met with the representatives of RD Group including their
attorney Nick Wood, of Snell and Wilmer, several weeks ago to discuss their
proposed PUD and to review its impact on the Kierland community, located in the
area south of Greenway Parkway and west of Kierland Blvd.
Our interactions with the Rd Group representatives were detailed and positive. We
discussed in particular the impact on single family dwellings in the area. After
thorough review, we support this project as submitted, and we have no objections to
the project as presented.
Please note some of the key reasons why we support the submission:
6 stories and 70 feet in height, appropriate given the distances from single
family dwelling front yards. Had these distances been less, we would not
support the height which is planned.
Setbacks of 25 feet on the south side of the property, and distances of 560
feet+/- of the southwest corner of the building to the front of the furthest home
on the west and south side of East Acoma Rd., and
430 ft+/-from the from the closest home on the east and south side of East Acoma
Rd., at the intersection of N 69th street.
We also like the underground parking, and # of parking spots planned, which
exceed ordinance requirements; the 27% open space, which also exceeds
ordinance requirements, and 52.3 DU/AC, which is well within densities for
comparable projects north and south of Greenway Parkway within Kierland.
Additionally, the developer has generously agreed to donate $100,000 to the Parks
Foundation for the renovation of SandPiper park in the area, for the benefit of the
entire neighborhood.
We believe the RD Group have set a good example of responsible development in
Kierland, and their collaborative and positive engagement with us is responsive, in
Page 584
our opinion, to the needs of the neighborhood.
As you know, it is the KCA mission and vision to help produce positive outcomes
which consider and respond to the needs of existing residents as well as future
residents for all development and re-development in the Kierland neighborhood.
Thank you for your attention and consideration of this project when it comes before
you at the City Council.
Wayne Mailloux
Chairman,
Kierland Community Alliance
waynemailloux@me.com
Page 585
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-76-21-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting February 07, 2022
Request From CP/GCP PCD
Request To PUD
Location Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2 were heard concurrently.
Mr. Nick Wood, Representative with Snell & Wilmer, introduced himself and gave an
overview of both the GPA and Rezoning requests. He went over the need for housing
within an employment center, the consistency with the character of the surrounding area
and how this site will function with recently approved cases in the nearby area. Mr.
Wood also shard specific details about the site plan, elevations, open space areas and
traffic. He highlighted the setbacks proposed and frontage standards, which will activate
the street frontages and help to create a more pedestrian friendly environment. He
shared the shade study, which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect and
discussed the proposed perimeter landscape treatments, which will provide visual
interest.
VPC Discussion:
None
Public Comment:
None
Applicants Response:
None
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 586
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-76-21-2
Date of VPC Meeting May 2, 2022
Request From CP/GCP PCD
Request To PUD
Proposed Use Multifamily residential and commercial uses
Location Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn
Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 11-0 with committee members Balderrama, Goodhue,
Hall, Mazza, Petersen, Popovic, Schmidt, Severs,
Sparks, Wise, and Lesher in favor.
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2 were heard concurrently by the committee.
Chair Gubser and committee member Bowman left the meeting, bringing the quorum to
11 members.
Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a presentation on cases
GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2. Mr. Bojórquez discussed the location of the site, noting
the existing and proposed General Plan Land Use Map designations. Mr. Bojórquez
discussed the surrounding zoning and proposed land uses part of the PUD case. Mr.
Bojórquez discussed the location of the site within the Desert Ridge and Kierland
employment center and described how this project furthers other policy plans. Mr.
Bojórquez described the proposed site plan and building elevations, noting that a
maximum height of six stories and 70 feet would be permitted. Mr. Bojórquez noted that
that one letter of support and three letters in opposition had been received. Mr.
Bojórquez concluded the presentation by providing the staff findings and
recommendation of approval, describing the proposed stipulations for case Z-76-21-2,
as presented in the staff report.
Nick Wood, representing the applicant with Snell & Wilmer LLP, introduced himself and
his team. Mr. Wood discussed the location of the site in relation to other projects
approved in the area. Mr. Wood stated that this development is over 500 feet north of
the closest single-family home south of the site, adding that the Kierland Community
Alliance supports this project. Mr. Wood stated that the minor general plan amendment
case supports the removal of industrially-designated land on the site. Mr. Wood
compared the previous proposal with the current proposal, which show a decrease in
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 587
density and shifting of the building away from the west property line. Mr. Wood stated
that other changes made include the addition of patios along the street to activate this
area and two stories of underground parking below grade. Mr. Wood discussed the
proposed development standards, including proposed parking standards. Mr. Wood
discussed the proposed open space, building articulation designs and showed site
renderings. Mr. Wood concluded the presentation by requesting approval of cases
GPA-PV-4-21-2 and Z-76-21-2.
Questions from the Committee:
Vice Chair Lesher asked if any committee members had questions for the presenters.
Jennifer Hall gave kudos to the applicant for the changes made and appreciates the
architecture provided in this project. This design goes above and beyond, plus it looks
classy.
Alex Popovic stated that a loss of 51 dwelling units from 370 to 319 is a big
compromise. Mr. Popovic appreciates the applicant’s collaboration with the community.
Public Comment:
None.
Applicant Response to Public Comment:
None.
Vice Chair Lesher asked for a motion on this item.
MOTION – Z-76-21-2:
Alan Sparks motioned to recommend approval of Z-71-21-2 per the staff
recommendation. Roy Wise seconded the motion.
VOTE – Z-76-21-2:
11-0; motion to approve passed with committee members Balderrama, Goodhue, Hall,
Mazza, Petersen, Popovic, Schmidt, Severs, Sparks, Wise, and Lesher in favor.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
No comments.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 588
Attachment E
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
June 2, 2022
ITEM NO: 5
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-76-21-2 (Icon Kierland PUD) (Companion Case GPA-PV-4-
21-2)
Location: Southwest corner of Kierland Boulevard and Marilyn Road
From: CP/GCP PCD
To: PUD
Acreage: 6.10
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow multifamily residential and commercial
uses.
Applicant: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Owner: Valwood Mesquite, LLC
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 2/7/2022 Information only
Paradise Valley 5/2/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 11-0.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee recommendation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Gaynor made a MOTION to approve Z-76-21-2, per the Paradise
Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Gaynor
Second: McCabe
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Howard and Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes (possibly in error)
Findings:
1. The proposed development is compatible with the existing land use pattern in the area
and is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed
Use (Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre).
2. The proposed development contains enhanced standards that will result in a more
walkable, shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment. The development will provide
increased shade which will help to reduce the urban heat island effect.
3. The proposed development will provide additional housing options close to employers
in a designated Major Employment Center.
Page 589
Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Icon at Kierland PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning Department within 30
days of City Council approval of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall
be consistent with Development Narrative date stamped April 4, 2022, as modified by
the following stipulations.
a. Front Cover, add “City Council adopted: [Insert Adoption date]”
b. Page 9, Section D2.a., Landscape Setbacks (Minimum): Clarify landscape
setback standard along the north and south property lines to be consistent with
the proposed site plan by requiring a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape setback
along the south and a minimum 0-foot-wide landscape setback along the north
property line where not adjacent to a street.
c. Page 10, Section D2.d., Perimeter Property Lines – Not Adjacent to Public
Right-of-Way (North, South, and West Property Lines): Remove the reference to
the north property line as no landscape setback is provided here.
d. Page 11, Section D3.b., Parking Standards, Automotive Parking Location,
Parking Location, Automotive: Modify the maximum number of parking spaces
along the main entry drive that are located outside of the garage building
footprint or building envelope to a maximum of five (5) spaces to be consistent
with the proposed site plan.
e. Page 17, Section E2. b., Uniform Perimeter Design: Modify the third bullet to
“Five (5) different accent species”.
f. Page 21, Section H.1, Infrastructure, Grading and Drainage: Replace the fourth
sentence as follows: Therefore, the subject site is not anticipated to provide any
supplemental retention onsite, and may be required to address “first flush”
stormwater treatment in accordance with the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Policies and Standards Manual, current edition.
g. Page 23, Section I., Comparative Zoning Standards Table: Replace CP/GCP
standards with C-2 standards.
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this development. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and approved
by the City.
3. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping,
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
4. The developer shall record a Notice to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport
in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of Scottsdale
Municipal Airport (SDL) to future owners or tenants of the property.
5. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to final site plan approval
that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the development
received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary equipment used
Page 590
during construction exceeds the height of the permanent structure a separate Form
7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and a “No Hazard Determination” obtained prior
to the construction start date.
6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
7. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 591
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-DSTV-1
-22-2 - Approximately 2,400 Feet Southwest of the Southwest Corner of Cave
Creek Road and Jomax Road (Resolution 22044)
Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation on 29.48
acres from Parks / Open Space - Publicly Owned and Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units
per acre, to Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre and Residential 15+ dwelling
units per acre. This is a companion case to Z-6-22-2 and must be heard first, followed
by Z-6-22-2.
Summary
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Current Designation: Parks / Open Space - Publicly Owned (1.56 acres) and
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre (27.92 acres)
Proposed Designation: Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre (14.39 acres) and
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre (15.09 acres)
Acreage: 29.48 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Applicant: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 3,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-2.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Desert View Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and
Jomax Road.
Page 592
Council District: 2
Parcel Addresses: None
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 593
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-DSTV-1-
22-2, CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.
____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by
Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-DSTV-1-22-2. The 29.48
acres located approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave
Creek Road and Jomax Road is designated as 14.39 acres of Residential 10 to 15
dwelling units per acre and 15.09 acres of Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.
SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as
shown below:
-1- Resolution
Page 594
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July 2022.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
-2- Resolution
Page 595
By:___________________________
___________________________
REVIEWED BY:
______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
PL:tml:LF22-0990:7-1-22
-3- Resolution
Page 596
Attachment B
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
April 29, 2022
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Applicant: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Location: Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the
southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax
Road
Acreage: 29.48 acres
Current Plan Designation: Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned (1.56 acres)
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre (27.92
acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre (14.39
acres) and Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
(15.09 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: A minor General Plan Amendment to Residential 10
to 15 dwelling units per acre and Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre to allow multifamily
residential
Desert View Village Planning
Committee Meeting Date: May 3, 2022
Staff Recommendation: Approval
FINDINGS:
1) The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 10 to 15
dwelling units per acre and Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre would allow
Page 597
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Page 2
higher density attached townhouses, condominiums, or apartments, which are
consistent with land uses in the surrounding area.
2) The companion rezoning case, Z-6-22-2, proposes a single-family and
multifamily residential development, which, as stipulated, protects the character
of the surrounding area by concentrating density along Cave Creek Road, an
arterial street, and away from the undisturbed hillside portion of the development.
3) The subject site is appropriate for residential uses at the proposed densities and
provides new housing opportunities in this part of the city. Furthermore, the
development has adequate street access and provides various opportunities for
recreation to future residents.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is 29.48 acres of undeveloped desert land, located approximately 2,400
feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road. The
companion Rezoning Case Z-6-22-2 is requesting to rezone a larger site (417.33 acres)
from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to R1-10 (Single-Family Residence
District), R-2 (Multifamily Residence District), and R-3A (Multifamily Residence District)
to allow the development of a new single-family and multifamily residential community.
The General Plan Land Use Map designates 27.92 acres of the subject site as
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre and designates 1.56 acres on the northern
edge of the site as Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned. While the subject site overlaps
slightly with the larger Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned designation to the north, the
subject site is part of a larger area that was recently auctioned by the Arizona State
Land Department to a private developer with no plans for preservation within the subject
site. However, as stipulated in the companion rezoning case Z-6-22-2 the developer
shall dedicate a portion of the overall site to the City of Phoenix for a future mountain
preserve. Furthermore, a public multi-use trail will be provided on the site to promote
recreation and connectivity. In 1996, the City Council approved the North Land Use
Plan, which identified strategies for regional employment, desert preservation, the
location of primary washes, residential changes based on hydrology, infrastructure
efficiency, and character areas. The plan identifies the subject site as a proposed land
use of Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre and within the suburban desert
character area.
The overall development proposes a residential density of 3.7 dwelling units per acre,
which is consistent with the density envisioned in the North Land Use Plan. However,
since the density is concentrated along the Cave Creek Road frontage, a minor General
Plan Amendment to Residential 10 to 15 and Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre is
required. Additionally, the proposed development, as stipulated in the companion case,
would preserve and protect the surrounding natural resources by incorporating design
features, such as significant preserved hillside land, preserved natural washes and
Page 598
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Page 3
open space amenities on site, and significant landscaped buffers surrounding the
multifamily development, furthering the intent of the North Land Use Plan.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North of the subject site is the Cave Buttes Dam, owned by the Flood Control District of
Maricopa County, which is designated as Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned on the
General Plan Land Use Map.
South, east, and west of the site is undeveloped desert land, which is designated on the
General Plan Land Use Map as Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre.
Existing General Plan Land Use Map designation, Source: Planning and Development Department
RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES
• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels
of increased intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.
The proposed minor General Plan Amendment, along with the companion
rezoning case, Z-6-22-2, would allow development of a new residential
community that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and respectful of
local conditions. The overall proposed density of the site is similar to densities in
Page 599
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Page 4
the surrounding neighborhood and as stipulated, the proposal incorporates large
setbacks, landscaping, and density limits that prevent the development from
having a negative impact on the surrounding area.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS
• CERTAINTY & CHARACTER: DESIGN PRINCIPLES: Promote neighborhood
identity through planning that reinforces the existing landscaping and
character of the area. Each new development should contribute to the
character identified for the village; Integrate into the development design
natural features such as washes, canals, significant topography and
existing vegetation, which are important in providing character to new
subdivisions.
As stipulated in the companion rezoning case, Z-6-22-2, the proposed
development will reinforce the character of the area by dedicating land to the City
for the Sonoran Preserve, providing a public trail network with access points to
the desert park/mountain preserve area, and by maintaining the existing wash
and hillside areas within the subdivision as natural features. These design
elements, which are facilitated by the shift in units allowed by the proposed minor
General Plan Amendment, enhance the desert character of the Village and
incorporate natural features that promote the identity of the Village.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY
• TREES AND SHADE: DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into
the design of new development and redevelopment projects throughout
Phoenix.
As stipulated in the companion rezoning case Z-6-22-2, the proposal will be
required to provide shade along the sidewalks, trails, and pedestrian paths within
and adjacent to the site, in addition to providing significant landscaping. This will
help to provide shade for pedestrians and bicyclists in and around the community
and to mitigate the urban heat island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus
cooling the micro-climate around the vicinity.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-22-2. The proposed land use map
designation allows for development that is consistent in overall density with the
surrounding developments and locates density appropriately near a major street. The
companion rezoning case, Z-6-22-2, as stipulated, will provide compatibility with the
surrounding area and protect the natural character of the Desert View Village.
Page 600
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Page 5
Writer
Anthony Grande
April 29, 2022
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Page 601
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 ACRES: 29.48 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Jason Morris
EXISTING:
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac ( 27.92 +/- Acres)
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned ( 1.56 +/- Acres)
Rd
C re
Proposed Change Area ek
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac Ca
ve
Commercial Yearling Rd Alignment
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac ( 14.39 +/- Acres)
Residential 15+ du/ac ( 15.09 +/- Acres)
Rd
C re
ek
Proposed Change Area
Ca
ve
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac Yearling Rd Alignment
Residential 15+ du/ac
Page 602
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2_BW ACRES: 29.48 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Jason Morris
EXISTING:
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac ( 27.92 +/- Acres)
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned ( 1.56 +/- Acres)
Rd
C re
Proposed Change Area ek
Residential 2 to 5 du/acre Ca
ve
Commercial Yearling Rd Alignment
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
E E E E E
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac ( 14.39 +/- Acres)
Residential 15+ du/ac ( 15.09 +/- Acres)
Rd
C re
ek
Proposed Change Area
Ca
ve
Residential 10 to 15 du/acre Yearling Rd Alignment
Residential 15+ du/acre
Page 603
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Date of VPC Meeting May 3, 2022
Request From Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned and Residential 2
to 5 dwelling units per acre
Request To Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre and
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Proposed Use Single-family and multifamily residential
Location Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest
corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 7-2
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 and Z-6-22-2 were heard concurrently.
One request to speak in favor and nine requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Anthony Grande, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases GPA-
DSTV-1-22-2 and Z-6-22-2. Mr. Grande provided an overview of the location of the
request and summarized the General Plan Land Use Map designation and proposed
amendment, noting that staff recommends approval of the GPA. He described the
surrounding land uses and zoning, the proposed zoning districts, and the proposed
development, noting the unit counts in each portion and certain aspects of the open
space and trails to be provided. He summarized the community input and the staff
findings, noting that the staff recommends approval of the rezoning with stipulations.
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the setback from Cave Creek Road. Mr. Grande
replied that it is 140 feet from the property line, which would be 205 feet from the
centerline of the street.
Benjamin Tate, representative with Withey Morris, summarized the history of the
property, existing zoning, and surrounding land uses. He described the details of the
proposal, including the housing product types, network of proposed trails, the hillside
dedication to the city, the maintenance of the existing wash as a natural resource, and
200 West Washington Street, 3 rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 604
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 2
the landscaping and shade aspects of the proposal. He described the existing densities
in the surrounding area, which he stated are comparable to the density of the
applicant’s proposed development. He described the transportation aspects of the
project, including dedicating right-of-way for Cave Creek Road, a new traffic signal at
the intersection with Cave Creek Road, and the connections with the existing stub
streets.
Committee Questions
Chair Bowser asked whether the lots on the western edge are hillside lots. Mr. Tate
replied that there would be no hillside lots in the development.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he believes the proposal fits with the surrounding area,
but that he is concerned with the lots directly adjacent to the existing R1-18 zoning
district. Mr. Tate stated that the site plan concentrates a significant amount of open
space along that edge of the development to create a buffer and that the development
has an appropriate density gradient.
Committee Member Powell asked if the developer would be widening Cave Creek
Road to three southbound lanes and if there would be a change to the northbound
lanes. Mr. Tate replied that the developer would be widening the southbound side to
three lanes, but that the northbound lanes would be up to a future developer on the east
side of Cave Creek Road.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the stipulated bus stop and if there was bus
service along Cave Creek Road today. Mr. Tate replied that he didn’t believe there was
existing bus service on that corridor but that it is likely stipulated because of the
potential for future service.
Committee Member Hankins asked about the dam to the north of the project and the
remote-control air strip on the other side of the dam. Chair Bowser noted that the
question about the dam was not a land use issue. Mr. Tate replied that the remote-
control air strip doesn’t require notification, but that they would disclose the existence of
the air strip to future residents. Chair Bowser agreed that it is better to disclose it.
Mr. Powell asked if the apartments would have electric vehicle charging stations
installed. Mr. Tate stated that they would be provided, as this is now considered an
expectation in luxury buildings.
Committee Member Israel asked about the community outreach conducted. Mr. Tate
replied that they had conducted the required notifications and neighborhood meetings
and had individual conversations with neighbors to address concerns.
Mr. Israel asked if the 3-story buildings would have elevators and what the cost for
electric vehicle charging would be. Mr. Tate replied that the buildings would be walk-ups
and that the electric vehicle charging cost to the tenants is minimal and only covers the
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 605
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 3
cost of the electricity, not generating profit for the developer.
Mr. Nowell asked about the density when the hillside area is subtracted from the
calculation. Mr. Tate replied that it would be 4.25 units per acre. Mr. Nowell followed up
by asking if it made more sense to be less dense closer to the preserve. Mr. Tate
agreed and stated that the development provides its largest lots and lowest densities
along the edge of the preserve, creating a desirable density gradient between the
eastern and western edges of the property.
Public Comments
Denny Hasenbank introduced himself and stated that he had moved to the
neighborhood because of the larger lots and that 80 percent of the residents are
opposed to the development. He stated that the development economics doesn’t work
out without the apartment component and that he is concerned about the minimal
architectural styling and the effect of the development on surrounding property values.
Robert Funk introduced himself and stated that adding 400 rental units is a problem, as
it would result in over 1,000 people living there. He stated that residents of this area
want single-family housing, noting that residents have made comments about
infrastructure and schools. He stated he wants to enjoy the lower density of the area.
Jeff Karau introduced himself and stated that he was concerned about the connecting
streets, which require a half-mile drive within the existing subdivision. He stated that he
suggests removing the stub street connections. He further stated that there are no
three-story buildings along this stretch of Cave Creek Road and that he believes the
height is a problem.
William Langdon introduced himself and asked about floodplain issues and stated
concerns about traffic on Hillstone Way. He asked whether a new development would
be on the adjacent hillside area. He stated that traffic on Cave Creek Road is a problem
and that there is too much density in the area. He further stated concerns about
schools.
Joe Abrahamson introduced himself and stated that the density is getting too high in
this area. He stated that he didn’t move to this area to have apartments nearby and that
they didn’t need those types of buildings in this area.
Marcy Mevorach introduced herself and stated that the population is growing and
Phoenix needs to accommodate the growth with new development. She stated that the
existing communities also had to clear vacant land, noting that eventually every piece of
land will be developed. She stated that she believes the developer is proposing a good
product.
Mead Summer introduced himself and stated that the community had argued against
the three-story request for the other multifamily development in this area and the
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 606
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 4
committee agreed to limit it to two stories. He stated that Cave Creek Road has a lot of
traffic and it’s not safe to add more, further stating concern about the stub street
connections to the existing subdivision.
Lauren Prole introduced herself and stated that she is concerned about the density of
the proposal and that Desert Peak Parkway already has a lot of traffic. She stated that
the roads are getting busier and unsafe for children. She stated that she believes
schools are an issue as well.
Brian Wilson introduced himself and stated he was concerned with the connections to
the stub streets into the existing subdivision, which doesn’t add value to the existing
residents since the new development would be gated. He stated that it would be an
expense to the existing community to take down fencing.
Z. Prole introduced himself and stated that he is concerned about the traffic generated
from the proposed project.
Chair Bowser stated that it was important to note the correct information about the
schools in the area and that the schools are under capacity.
Applicant Response
Benjamin Tate stated that the development is driven by what the General Plan calls for,
not simply economics. He stated that the connection to the stub streets is not driven by
the developer, rather by requirements of the Street Transportation Department, and that
the applicant would work with the City to see if they can make the connections
emergency only. He stated the development team had a meeting with the school
superintendent to discuss school needs and that there was no need for a new school
since the school are not at capacity. He stated that the vast majority of the traffic from
the site will be southbound and that the multifamily buildings will be over a mile from any
of the homes in the existing subdivision, where neighbors have concerns.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that the committee tries to keep the zoning similar to the
surrounding area and that the proposal fits. He stated that adding people will drive
demand for new commercial uses and that he understood the desire to limit the
development to two stories.
Chair Bowser stated that the grade of Cave Creek Road is another factor to consider.
MOTION – GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to recommend approval of GPA-DSTV-1-22-2.
Committee Member Hankins seconded the motion.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 607
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 5
VOTE
7-2, motion to recommend approval passed; Members Dean, Hankins, Israel, Powell,
Santoro, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Members Nowell and Reynolds against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 608
Attachment D
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
June 2, 2022
ITEM NO: 6
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Location: Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave
Creek Road and Jomax Road
From: Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Parks/Open Space -
Publicly Owned
To: Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre and
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 29.48
Proposal: A Minor General Plan Amendment to allow development of garden-style
multifamily residential development (15+ dwelling units per acre) and
casita-style single-family duplex rental residences (10 to 15 dwelling units
per acre).
Applicant: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Owner: Arizona State Land Trust
Representative: Jason, Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 5/3/2022 Approval. Vote: 7-2.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Desert View Village Planning
Committee recommendation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Gaynor made a MOTION to approve GPA-DSTV-1-22-2, per the
Desert View Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Gaynor
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Howard and Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 10 to 15
dwelling units per acre and Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre would allow higher
density attached townhouses, condos, or apartments, which do not conflict with the
land uses in the surrounding area.
2. The companion rezoning case, Z-6-22-2, proposes a single-family and multifamily
residential development, which, as stipulated, protects the character of the surrounding
Page 609
area by concentrating density along Cave Creek Road, an arterial street, and away
from the undisturbed hillside portion of the development
3. The subject site is appropriate for residential uses at the proposed densities and
provides new housing opportunities in this part of the city. Furthermore, the
development has adequate street access and provides various opportunities for
recreation to future residents.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 610
Attachment E
Anthony M Grande
From: Tom Bonanno
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 7:40 PM
To: Anthony M Grande; Tom Bonanno
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)…
Hi Anthony,
I live immediately West of the proposed new Development. I understand the Village planning committee is asked to
amend the current DR Horton rezoning application to approve an additional 400 rental units on approximately 20
acres. Those 400 units allow over 1,000 people to be living in those units. This zoning request which should never be
approved. Please take the time to drive around the area as see how it is all singe‐family homes. Everyone of us wants to
remain that way. VOTE NO on the amendment.
Thank you,
Tom Bonanno
M: 602.743.9200
Page 611
Anthony M Grande
From: Sarah Crank
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 9:14 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA-DSTV-e-22-2 amendment. As a resident of this area I strongly object to the addition of 400
rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional 1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the
neighborhood. My community is less than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the value,
the character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly object to the committee
approving 400 rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Stone Butte Homeowner
Sarah Crank
sarahcrank@me.com
480.236.6232
Page 612
Anthony M Grande
From: Robert Funk
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:27 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case Z-6-22-2
Dear Anthony,
II want to go on record as strongly objecting to the proposed amendment for 400 Rental Units. A year ago my family
purchased a house in Stone Butte North that was developed by D R Horton with zoning for 1.9 houses per acre. The
zoning application next to us by the same developer will be more than double my density.
D R Hortons Rezoning Application (Case Z‐4‐6‐22‐2) is more than dense enough for this area with out adding 400 rental
units onto it. If you approve this amendment the Village Planning Committee you will not be serving the best interests
of the neighboring developments.
Please VOTE NO.
Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows
Page 613
Anthony M Grande
From: Bruce Gross
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:23 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: Bruce Gross
Subject: RE: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 Hearing
Dear Anthony,
I'm Bruce Gross and my single-family house is immediately to the west of this D R
Horton proposed development. I live in Desert Peak. I purchased my house and moved
in November 2017, to live in a nice neighborhood with the low density that my
community provides. It is also what the other communities are like around me.
I understand the Village planning committee is asked to amend the current D R Horton
rezoning application to approve an additional 400 rental units on approximately 20
acres. 400 units will allow over 1,000 people to be living in those units, plus D R Horton
want to also build a 2-story apartment complex.
Aside from destroying our “desert space” to walk-in, the impact on water and especially
getting on to Cave Creek, which is already like driving on a freeway, will make life here
in our community horrific. I hope you will consider denying this Amendment and
PLEASE VOTE NO.
Please think of our community as if you lived here as well.
Respectfully submitted,
Bruce Gross
Desert Peak owner
Bruce Gross
"Tell me and I forget.
Teach me and I remember.
Page 614
Involve me and I learn." Benjamin Franklin
Page 615
Anthony M Grande
From: Harold B. Jones, Jr.
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:41 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
I am writing in to express my opposition to the amendment of DR Horton’s application for the "Stone Butte East"
development.
I am not opposed to their original plan of 3 homes per acre, but now I hear they want to include 140
rental homes and a 260-unit apartment building which is entirely unacceptable to me. I bought my single
family home in Stone Butte believing we would see other single family homes in the future. That density
of rental homes and apartments simply do not belong in this area; we do not have the roadway capacity
nor the retail business to handle that additional population. I am convinced it will negatively affect my
quality of life, the quiet enjoyment of my home, and the valuation of my property.
Please, please do not approve their request for an amendment.
Best Regards,
Harold & Angie Jones
24218 N 22nd Street
Phoenix, AZ 85024
480-305-3328
Page 616
Anthony M Grande
From: N J
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 2:31 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Desert Peak VPC , D.R. Horton rezoning GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case Z-6-22-2)
Hello,
I live immediately west of the proposed new development by DR Horton on Desert Peak Parkway and Cave Creek Road.
I understand the village planning committee has been requested to amend the rezoning application to approve
additional rental units (D.R. Horton rezoning GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 ‐ Companion case Z‐6‐22‐2). This planned development
will significantly increase the traffic in the neighborhood and cause a lot of challenges.
DR Horton communities in Stoneview Butte North has a density of less than two houses per acre. I invested my hard‐
earned money in this neighborhood because of the low density. Now the same developer is requesting an amendment
to their rezoning application to add 400 rentals. This will more than double the density.
We strongly object to this rezoning request and recommend voting No to the amendment.
Regards
Nilesh Joshi
2108 E Chama Dr Phoenix AZ
Page 617
Anthony M Grande
From: Chris Smith
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 8:55 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA-DSTV-e-22-2 amendment. As a resident of this area I
strongly object to the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional
1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less
than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the
value, the character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density
neighborhood and strongly object to the committee approving 400 rental units in addition to the single
family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Chris Smith
Page 618
Anthony M Grande
From: William Wiltse
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 7:10 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
To Whom it May Concern,
We are relatively new homeowners in the Northview at Stone Butte neighborhood, directly west of the proposed
development referenced in case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2. I understand that the Village committee will be discussing a
proposed amendment that would allow for the building of 400 rental properties within the development. I purchased
my home in this area because of the large lot size and low density of homes. These rental units would not only have a
negative effect on nearby home values, it would also dramatically increase the amount of vehicular traffic on Cave Creek
Road. We have already noticed increased congestion in the short time since we have lived here and have concerns that
the rental units, in addition to all of the new single‐family homes, will cause this to become significantly worse.
These rental units were not part of the original neighborhood plan and should not be approved. Please consider the
impact on homeowners in the area and vote NO on this amendment.
Thank you for your consideration,
Bill & Angie Wiltse
2127 E Fallen Leaf Lane
Page 619
Anthony M Grande
From: joe@joea.com
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 6:31 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Developement hearing
I am very much opposed to this and would like to RTS for this meeting. This is just North of where I have lived for 22+
years.
Thanks,
Joe Abrahamson
Phoenix 85024
~~~~~
From: Sarah Crank
Date: April 30, 2022 at 9:13:02 AM MST
To: Bridgette Wilde, "Staff. Bridgette Wilde" , Charlie Wilde
, Beth Merkes
Subject: Village Planning Committee meeting *Action requested* - New Development by DR Horton
DR Horton is proposing a new "Stone Butte East" development which will be located between Northview and the Desert
Peak neighborhood to our east. They had originally applied for residential zoning permitting 3 homes per acre (our zoning
only allows for 1.95) but now they are looking to amend their application to include 140 rental homes and a 260-unit
apartment building which would increase that homes per acre significantly. There is an upcoming virtual meeting on May
3rd @ 6:30pm where neighbors can object to the amendment. If you would like to attend, comment, or speak at the
meeting, details can be found here: https://www.phoenix.gov/city.../PublicMeetings/220503004.pdf
Submit a comment on an agenda item:
Send your comments to: Anthony Grande at anthony.grande@phoenix.gov
By: 48 hours prior to start of the meeting - DEADLINE Sunday May1st 6:30 pm
Indicate Item Number and case number:
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Page 620
Anthony M Grande
From: jbbrabender@comcast.net
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:46 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case 2-6-22-2)
Please vote no. The area should be zoned single family residential which is consistent with the surrounding
neighborhood. I am a home owner in the North View at Stone Butte community. Thank you.
Jim Brabender
Sent from my iPhone
Page 621
Anthony M Grande
From: adesmond1
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 3:48 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert Peak VPC,
We live immediately West of this proposed new Development. The additional 400 units would impose higher traffic
volume, a basis for lower demographics to enter the area, and the area is not prepared to manage this volume and type
of household/residences. As residences of the community we experience daily issues that arise and will change with a
higher volume of people, i.e. taking our child to school; Cave Creak Dam Rd is our most direct route to access the
elementary and middle school, and cannot we widened due to homes already built. This is also a route for people to
commute to Deer Valley Road for work. As is may be possible to eventually connect Pinnacle Peak Parkway to 7th
Street, this will significantly increase traffic into our neighborhood from surrounding areas to reach other areas like
Norterra Shopping or I‐17. Obviously with this we will now be hindered with widening of streets to allow for the traffic,
leading to intersections with lights, delaying leaving and entry into the community.
As an example this happened on Norterra Parkway and North Valley Parkway and 19th avenue where two upper scale
neighborhoods of Dynamite Mountain Ranch and Fireside were suddenly built up with apartments, lowering the
demographics and increasing traffic which resulted in an intersection with a signal, included widening the road, that led
to be a common detour for people needing to avoid I‐17, not to mention increasing accidents in the neighborhood
resulting in a pedestrian being killed in what used to be a quiet, family‐oriented, safe neighborhood.
Overall growth is good, as the community CAN safely grow, with different levels of demographics which lead to
commerce that can support the surrounding area, but at this point it is difficult to see how this can be achieved as the
beautiful desert area is quickly being consumed by multilevel housing projects. Part of our investment was closing to
live outside of town and the congestion, hence investing the large sum of money to reside in a gated community. This
proposal is poorly planned as limited commerce is currently available, roads are not developed, and quite simply it will
change the landscape of our community for families hiking and riding. Multifamily dwellings such as apartments and
condominiums lead to increased crime and lower value of all surrounding neighborhoods. Transitory residents will not
be invested in our community.
Lastly, speaking of investment, the desert preserve and surrounding desert areas is another reason why we selected this
area to invest in our residence and call this our home. Not to watch it be monopolized by while DR Horton who sold lots
as a premium to us, finished selling our community, only to now submit a proposal for a new cash cow as they consume
the environment surrounding our investment with temporary low end housing with the goal of putting as many people
as possible in as small of a space as possible to make the most money. If they could would they build 4 story units rather
than just 2? When does it end? When we no longer have any mountain view and it is all a parking lot?
So as one development builds it will set the tone for more to follow. Please help us protect our property values and the
surrounding area, in keeping this community a quiet, safe, family‐oriented, home‐valued neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Ron and Andrea Desmond
2028 E Chama Dr
Phoenix, AZ 85024
(602)332‐3210
Page 622
Anthony M Grande
From: Karen Harding
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:25 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Desert View GPA Case # GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 Rezoning Case No: Z-6-22-2
Dear Mr. Grande,
As a new property owner in Stone Butte I’m writing to voice my disapproval with the proposed re‐zoning. I love my new
neighborhood and enjoy the privacy.
The proposed re‐zoning development will cause an increase in traffic, add to the air pollution, air quality and bring
excess noise. I oppose the concentration of housing you want to create. I don’t understand the need to change the
original zoning that was previously approved. The schools are already overflowing with students especially Pinnacle
High School.
I believe the zoning of the property in question should remain as is and not be changed.
My husband, William Langdon, would like to speak at your meeting. Thank you for your attention to this important
matter.
Karen Harding
William Langdon
1942 E Robb Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Will’s cell phone: 602‐549‐3948
Karen’s cell phone: 602‐330‐3743
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad [overview.mail.yahoo.com]
Page 623
Anthony M Grande
From: Matthew Harmon
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 2:13 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: Tara Harmon
Subject: Note regarding case GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 amendment. As a resident of this area I strongly object to
the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional 1000+ residents would
significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less than 2 houses per acre currently and the
addition of this amendment would significantly change the value, the character and the quiet nature of the
neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly object to the committee approving 400
rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Matt Harmon
Stone Butte Homeowner
Matt Harmon, Dealer Marketing Consultant
General Motors CSSR – Western Region
Text / Mobile: 425-309-1229
epsilon.com [epsilon.com]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Disclaimer The information in this email and any attachments may contain proprietary and confidential information that
is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, retention or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. When addressed to our clients or
vendors, any information contained in this e‐mail or any attachments is subject to the terms and conditions in any
governing contract. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please immediately contact the sender and delete the e‐
mail.
Page 624
Anthony M Grande
From: Jill Smith
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:37 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Opposition to GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA‐DSTV‐e‐22‐2 amendment. As a resident of this area (Stone Butte
North) I strongly object to the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex.
This additional 1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less
than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the value, the
character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly
object to the committee approving 400 rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Jill Smith
Page 625
Anthony M Grande
From: Kamal Jagga <1.kamal.j@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 12:47 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Action Request: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2) - I Vote No!
Dear Desert Peak PVC,
I live immediately west of this proposed new development. We bought this property because of the low population
density, healthy and safe environment for the families. Building this additional units will impact negatively the peaceful
and serene environment of our area. We strongly object to the Committee approving 400 rental units.
GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 (Companion Case Z‐6‐22‐2) ‐ I VOTE NO!
Thank you for understanding!
Regards
Kamal JAGGA
‐‐
Regards,
Kamal Jagga
Page 626
Anthony M Grande
From: Greg Pelegrin
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:17 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View Village Planning Committee,
I am a home owner adjacent to the proposed Stone Butte East development and moved into the area due to the open
space and fact that our development is less than 2 homes per acre. D.R. Horton already has zoning to build up to 5
homes per acre which is very dense for the area so why would this even be a consideration for 15+ units per acre? This is
the far north suburbs of Phoenix and the lack of transit options and nearby businesses does not warrant apartment style
housing in the area.
The other consideration for such a large number of homes being built per acre is the stress on the local infrastructure.
There are only 2 access points into and out of the proposed new development and that would lead to very heavy traffic
on both Cave Creek Rd and Desert Peak Pkwy. Also, the extra demand on current sewer and water lines and the
electrical grid in the area with 1000+ extra people living in the new proposed development.
Finally, there is already a lack of large parks and play areas for the children in the area as well as schools near capacity.
Has the project added enough room for play areas for children and room to add an additional school as needed?
Please leave this area that is zoned for single family homes the way it is to prevent much of the crowding that is
becoming more prevalent in many of the new D.R. Horton developments already built or are in the process of being built
in the Phoenix Valley.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Greg and Jaime Pelegrin
Page 627
Anthony M Grande
From: Ruffulo, Wendy
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:27 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (companion case Z-6-22-2)
We just recently purchased a Shea home just west of this planned new development. This area is all single family homes
which is one of the reasons why we selected this development. Single family homes is what we thought may be
developed, not apartments. Please vote NO.
Thank you
Get Outlook for iOS [aka.ms]
Page 628
Anthony M Grande
From: Lukas Treffers
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:44 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Good afternoon Desert Peak VPC,
I am writing you today in regards to the proposed new Development by DR Horton which includes 400 rental units. This
community primarily consists of single family homes and is one of the main reasons we chose to move here. There is low
traffic, minimal noise, and limited light pollution. With this potential addition of 400 units all of that goes out the
window. There will be an increase in traffic (accidents), noise and light pollution. This zoning request should not be
considered, myself and my fellow neighbors and community are against this. VOTE NO on this amendment.
Thank you for your time.
‐ Lukas
Page 629
Anthony M Grande
From: Tommy Ford
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:08 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Mr. Grande:
DR Horton did grading for the Northview Stone Butte several years ago and then Shea took over and started building new
homes. The 130 home gated community of Northview, is a quiet and removed area that we were drawn to almost 2 years
ago. We picked our lot, with delays it took over 1 1/2 years to finally close and move into our new home. Now almost a
month later, we are enjoying the quiet and simple life in our new community.
One of the primary reasons for buying in Northview, was the lack of traffic once you turn onto Pinnacle Peak and head
West. The area has nice homes built several years ago and only two condo complexes. We bought in Northview in part to
not live on a busy street, that would be more congested with both people, cars and noise. The area we live in is largely
homes, and is without rental apartments. Rental apartments will decrease the value of our new home, increase traffic and
congestion on Pinnacle Peak/Desert Peak, and bring a population of people who do not care about our homes and
values. We have nothing against people wanting, needing to live in apartments but they should be built in areas that
already have apartments/condos not in true residential neighborhoods.
We respectfully request to the Committee to not approve the 400 rental units, VOTE NO PLEASE.
Sincerely,
Tommy & Caroline Ford
2017 E Fallen Leaf Lane,
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Page 630
Anthony M Grande
From: Jes
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 1:40 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: jim.warning@phoenix.gov; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Stone Butte East (case nos Z-6-22 & GPA-DSTV-1-22)
To Whom it May Concern;
The upcoming plans for the development designated as "Stone Butte East" by DR Horton, creates multiple concerns for
existing residents in the neighboring areas. Desert Peak has maintained a family safe environment with low traffic,
unobstructed desert views, and a reasonable level of population. The addition of this monstrous development invades
the peacefulness that drew many of us to this area.
The following concerns exist for the majority of the current homeowners.
New construction will drive wildlife into our neighborhoods and backyards, creating dangers for our children, pets, and
ourselves.
Plans show through streets from our existing neighborhood roads and cul de sacs to the new neighborhoods, robbing us
of these areas and creating safety concerns.
The current traffic on Cave Creek is already difficult to navigate through without the addition of 4k plus new vehicles.
The plans call for a small area of Cave Creek to be widened, showing a futile attempt to appease the matter.
The continued growth of multi‐family residential areas is not something any of the current residents support.
Local schools are not equipped to support the massive spike in new residents.
Jessica White
Page 631
Racelle Escolar
From: J Karau
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 4:47 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Public comment for June 2 meeting case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Attachments: Jeff - Planning Commission Comments.docx
I am writing regarding case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 and companion case Z‐6‐22‐2. I have registered to speak but also wanted
to include a written comment with additional references. There is an old related case ( Z‐8‐04‐2 (PHO‐1‐15) ) from 2015
as well as a Google Maps link [google.com] to existing streets that dead‐ends just outside of our community.
Thanks,
Jeff
Page1 632
Racelle Escolar
From: Deanne Haverlock
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 11:24 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Re: Application Z-6-22-2 (Companion Case GPA-DSTV-1-22-2) #7
Sorry, wanted to be clear I oppose item #6 and 7 re: above application in my previous email.
Thanks!
Deanne Haverlock
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 2, 2022, at 9:56 AM, Deanne Haverlock wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> I would like to submit comment on above agenda item for re‐zoning and oppose the proposal. I am a resident in the
area and believe it’s desirable to keep the trust land open for nature and wildlife and keep the possible building on it to
a minimum to preserve the the beauty of our area.
>
> Thanks for your consideration and time.
> Respectfully,
> Deanne Haverlock
> Sent from my iPhone
Page1 633
Rcvd 6/2/2022
Desert Peak Homeowners Association
A Non-Profit Corporation
pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov
Dear Planning Commission Members,
We are writing today as the board of directors of the Desert Peak HOA, a neighboring community of 641
homes to the South of the proposed DR Horton community of Stone Butte East. During the Desert View
Village Planning Committee meeting neither the voices of the neighboring communities nor past
decisions by the Planning Commission were given much consideration before rushing to approve the
zoning changes in favor of the new community. The proposed Stone Butte East community is for the
area of over 400 acres west of Cave Creek Road and south of Jomax Road (case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 and
companion case Z-6-22-2). We strongly oppose DR Horton’s rezoning application without additional
changes.
The Desert Peak HOA and our community residents have concerns with the changes to the character of
the area with the height of the new community and concerns of traffic mainly within our community but
also in the surrounding area.
The first concern is for the overall character of the area by adding such dense new construction. During
DR Horton’s presentation they stated that the new community is a “mirror image” and just like they
“unfolded the page of a book” of the existing communities to the south. That is FALSE! The existing
communities consist of one and two-story homes, condos and apartments which fit in with the density
of the homes in the surrounding area when they were built.
In this zoning proposal DR Horton is asking for three-story buildings along Cave Creek Rd. which would
change the character of the area and set a precedent for other new communities in the future. Today,
there are NO existing three-story buildings along Cave Creek Rd. north of the 101. The residents of
multiple surrounding neighborhoods, including Desert Peak, are strongly opposed to setting the
precedent for three-story buildings in this area.
Back in 2015 a similar case was brought before the Planning commission for consideration regarding a
new apartment community at the corner of Cave Creek and Pinnacle Peak. This former rezoning case
was also brought by the same builder and was similarly seeking to build three-story apartment buildings
along Cave Creek Road. That proposal was modified to allow only two-story apartments and we ask that
you do the same in this case. The prior case for Desert Peak & Cave creek apartment was Z-8-04-2
(PHO-1-15).
Our second concern is related to the connection of the streets in the new gated community with the
streets of Desert Peak. There are three streets that are proposed to be connected to the new
community, East Rustling Oaks Ln, North 27th Pl, and North 29th Way. DR Horton has agreed to
Page 634
pedestrian access between the communities which we agree with and already have fencing with
pedestrian access at ends of those streets to support.
The issues arise due to the fact that the new community is gated so there is a one-sided benefit for the
new Stone Butte community to having vehicular ingress/egress within our community. We believe the
goals of the Complete Street Policy are fulfilled by the pedestrian gates and adding one-way access from
a private, gated community will not provide any additional benefit. If vehicle gates are required, Desert
Peak would have to pay to remove that existing fencing and pedestrian access even though we receive
no benefit from the vehicular connection. Two of the proposed connecting streets (Rustling Oaks Ln and
27th Pl) are nearly ½ mile of driving through Desert Peak to get to either major road, Cave Creek Rd or
Desert Peak Pkwy and we do not wish for our community to act as a ½ mile driveway for Stone Butte
East. This plan would add additional traffic within Desert Peak, cost the Desert Peak HOA/community
and provide no benefit to the Desert Peak community.
We disputed the facts that DR Horton claimed that this MUST be done in accordance with policy from
the Street Transportation department, but the concern was dismissed. In fact, when DR Horton built
our community of Desert Peak, they did the same thing with an existing community to the south. In that
case 25th St. was left as a dead end and the area within Desert Peak is used as a common area park. The
children in both communities enjoy walking/biking through this area for school and connecting the
neighbors. This area is just to the north of N. 25th St. and E. Casitas Del Rio Dr. (Google Maps link). We
ask that the connecting streets be removed from the plan and allow the streets of Desert Peak to remain
unchanged.
Lastly, we have serious concerns about DR Horton’s traffic study and statements that the community
will only generate additional southbound traffic and shouldn’t be a concern with adding an additional
1500+ homes. There are several streets in the area which are in need of improvement to handle the
existing traffic and adding more homes will only make matters worse. One of the areas of concern are
the bridge north of E. Lone Cactus Dr where Cave Creek narrows to 2 lanes, causing backups to Rose
Garden during high traffic hours. The intersection of Cave Creek Rd. and Pinnacle Peak to the east is
also an area of concern. Heading westbound at this intersection there are frequent backups to the
National cemetery entrance because the left turn lane is limited and there is no right turn lane. While
we understand the approach of having developers improve the areas along those roads as they are built,
we’d like to see a plan to handle the additional traffic in existing areas.
Sincerely,
Desert Peak HOA Board of Directors
Brian Wilson, President Jeff Karau, Vice President
Bruce Gross, Treasurer Lauren Prole, Secretary
John Tishuck, Director Jessica Noto, Director
Dave Dahm, Director
Page 635
Racelle Escolar
From: Margaret Rehberg
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:57 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Stone butte east
Good Afternoon
We live in Desert Peak on Rustling Oaks Ln and will be greatly impacted by the travel to Stone Butte east. They must
install a road with their own access. We will become a heavy traveled parking lot and for what?
Page1 636
Report
-22-2 - Approximately 2,400 Feet Southwest of the Southwest Corner of Cave
Creek Road and Jomax Road (Resolution 22044)
Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation on 29.48
acres from Parks / Open Space - Publicly Owned and Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units
per acre, to Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre and Residential 15+ dwelling
units per acre. This is a companion case to Z-6-22-2 and must be heard first, followed
by Z-6-22-2.
Summary
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Current Designation: Parks / Open Space - Publicly Owned (1.56 acres) and
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre (27.92 acres)
Proposed Designation: Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre (14.39 acres) and
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre (15.09 acres)
Acreage: 29.48 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Applicant: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 3,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-2.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Desert View Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and
Jomax Road.
Page 592
Council District: 2
Parcel Addresses: None
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 593
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-DSTV-1-
22-2, CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.
____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by
Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-DSTV-1-22-2. The 29.48
acres located approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave
Creek Road and Jomax Road is designated as 14.39 acres of Residential 10 to 15
dwelling units per acre and 15.09 acres of Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.
SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as
shown below:
-1- Resolution
Page 594
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July 2022.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
-2- Resolution
Page 595
By:___________________________
___________________________
REVIEWED BY:
______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
PL:tml:LF22-0990:7-1-22
-3- Resolution
Page 596
Attachment B
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
April 29, 2022
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Applicant: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Location: Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the
southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax
Road
Acreage: 29.48 acres
Current Plan Designation: Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned (1.56 acres)
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre (27.92
acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre (14.39
acres) and Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
(15.09 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: A minor General Plan Amendment to Residential 10
to 15 dwelling units per acre and Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre to allow multifamily
residential
Desert View Village Planning
Committee Meeting Date: May 3, 2022
Staff Recommendation: Approval
FINDINGS:
1) The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 10 to 15
dwelling units per acre and Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre would allow
Page 597
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Page 2
higher density attached townhouses, condominiums, or apartments, which are
consistent with land uses in the surrounding area.
2) The companion rezoning case, Z-6-22-2, proposes a single-family and
multifamily residential development, which, as stipulated, protects the character
of the surrounding area by concentrating density along Cave Creek Road, an
arterial street, and away from the undisturbed hillside portion of the development.
3) The subject site is appropriate for residential uses at the proposed densities and
provides new housing opportunities in this part of the city. Furthermore, the
development has adequate street access and provides various opportunities for
recreation to future residents.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is 29.48 acres of undeveloped desert land, located approximately 2,400
feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road. The
companion Rezoning Case Z-6-22-2 is requesting to rezone a larger site (417.33 acres)
from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to R1-10 (Single-Family Residence
District), R-2 (Multifamily Residence District), and R-3A (Multifamily Residence District)
to allow the development of a new single-family and multifamily residential community.
The General Plan Land Use Map designates 27.92 acres of the subject site as
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre and designates 1.56 acres on the northern
edge of the site as Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned. While the subject site overlaps
slightly with the larger Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned designation to the north, the
subject site is part of a larger area that was recently auctioned by the Arizona State
Land Department to a private developer with no plans for preservation within the subject
site. However, as stipulated in the companion rezoning case Z-6-22-2 the developer
shall dedicate a portion of the overall site to the City of Phoenix for a future mountain
preserve. Furthermore, a public multi-use trail will be provided on the site to promote
recreation and connectivity. In 1996, the City Council approved the North Land Use
Plan, which identified strategies for regional employment, desert preservation, the
location of primary washes, residential changes based on hydrology, infrastructure
efficiency, and character areas. The plan identifies the subject site as a proposed land
use of Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre and within the suburban desert
character area.
The overall development proposes a residential density of 3.7 dwelling units per acre,
which is consistent with the density envisioned in the North Land Use Plan. However,
since the density is concentrated along the Cave Creek Road frontage, a minor General
Plan Amendment to Residential 10 to 15 and Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre is
required. Additionally, the proposed development, as stipulated in the companion case,
would preserve and protect the surrounding natural resources by incorporating design
features, such as significant preserved hillside land, preserved natural washes and
Page 598
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Page 3
open space amenities on site, and significant landscaped buffers surrounding the
multifamily development, furthering the intent of the North Land Use Plan.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North of the subject site is the Cave Buttes Dam, owned by the Flood Control District of
Maricopa County, which is designated as Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned on the
General Plan Land Use Map.
South, east, and west of the site is undeveloped desert land, which is designated on the
General Plan Land Use Map as Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre.
Existing General Plan Land Use Map designation, Source: Planning and Development Department
RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES
• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels
of increased intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.
The proposed minor General Plan Amendment, along with the companion
rezoning case, Z-6-22-2, would allow development of a new residential
community that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and respectful of
local conditions. The overall proposed density of the site is similar to densities in
Page 599
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Page 4
the surrounding neighborhood and as stipulated, the proposal incorporates large
setbacks, landscaping, and density limits that prevent the development from
having a negative impact on the surrounding area.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS
• CERTAINTY & CHARACTER: DESIGN PRINCIPLES: Promote neighborhood
identity through planning that reinforces the existing landscaping and
character of the area. Each new development should contribute to the
character identified for the village; Integrate into the development design
natural features such as washes, canals, significant topography and
existing vegetation, which are important in providing character to new
subdivisions.
As stipulated in the companion rezoning case, Z-6-22-2, the proposed
development will reinforce the character of the area by dedicating land to the City
for the Sonoran Preserve, providing a public trail network with access points to
the desert park/mountain preserve area, and by maintaining the existing wash
and hillside areas within the subdivision as natural features. These design
elements, which are facilitated by the shift in units allowed by the proposed minor
General Plan Amendment, enhance the desert character of the Village and
incorporate natural features that promote the identity of the Village.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY
• TREES AND SHADE: DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into
the design of new development and redevelopment projects throughout
Phoenix.
As stipulated in the companion rezoning case Z-6-22-2, the proposal will be
required to provide shade along the sidewalks, trails, and pedestrian paths within
and adjacent to the site, in addition to providing significant landscaping. This will
help to provide shade for pedestrians and bicyclists in and around the community
and to mitigate the urban heat island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus
cooling the micro-climate around the vicinity.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-22-2. The proposed land use map
designation allows for development that is consistent in overall density with the
surrounding developments and locates density appropriately near a major street. The
companion rezoning case, Z-6-22-2, as stipulated, will provide compatibility with the
surrounding area and protect the natural character of the Desert View Village.
Page 600
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Page 5
Writer
Anthony Grande
April 29, 2022
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Page 601
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 ACRES: 29.48 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Jason Morris
EXISTING:
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac ( 27.92 +/- Acres)
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned ( 1.56 +/- Acres)
Rd
C re
Proposed Change Area ek
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac Ca
ve
Commercial Yearling Rd Alignment
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac ( 14.39 +/- Acres)
Residential 15+ du/ac ( 15.09 +/- Acres)
Rd
C re
ek
Proposed Change Area
Ca
ve
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac Yearling Rd Alignment
Residential 15+ du/ac
Page 602
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2_BW ACRES: 29.48 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Jason Morris
EXISTING:
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac ( 27.92 +/- Acres)
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned ( 1.56 +/- Acres)
Rd
C re
Proposed Change Area ek
Residential 2 to 5 du/acre Ca
ve
Commercial Yearling Rd Alignment
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
E E E E E
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac ( 14.39 +/- Acres)
Residential 15+ du/ac ( 15.09 +/- Acres)
Rd
C re
ek
Proposed Change Area
Ca
ve
Residential 10 to 15 du/acre Yearling Rd Alignment
Residential 15+ du/acre
Page 603
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Date of VPC Meeting May 3, 2022
Request From Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned and Residential 2
to 5 dwelling units per acre
Request To Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre and
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Proposed Use Single-family and multifamily residential
Location Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest
corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 7-2
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 and Z-6-22-2 were heard concurrently.
One request to speak in favor and nine requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Anthony Grande, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases GPA-
DSTV-1-22-2 and Z-6-22-2. Mr. Grande provided an overview of the location of the
request and summarized the General Plan Land Use Map designation and proposed
amendment, noting that staff recommends approval of the GPA. He described the
surrounding land uses and zoning, the proposed zoning districts, and the proposed
development, noting the unit counts in each portion and certain aspects of the open
space and trails to be provided. He summarized the community input and the staff
findings, noting that the staff recommends approval of the rezoning with stipulations.
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the setback from Cave Creek Road. Mr. Grande
replied that it is 140 feet from the property line, which would be 205 feet from the
centerline of the street.
Benjamin Tate, representative with Withey Morris, summarized the history of the
property, existing zoning, and surrounding land uses. He described the details of the
proposal, including the housing product types, network of proposed trails, the hillside
dedication to the city, the maintenance of the existing wash as a natural resource, and
200 West Washington Street, 3 rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 604
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 2
the landscaping and shade aspects of the proposal. He described the existing densities
in the surrounding area, which he stated are comparable to the density of the
applicant’s proposed development. He described the transportation aspects of the
project, including dedicating right-of-way for Cave Creek Road, a new traffic signal at
the intersection with Cave Creek Road, and the connections with the existing stub
streets.
Committee Questions
Chair Bowser asked whether the lots on the western edge are hillside lots. Mr. Tate
replied that there would be no hillside lots in the development.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he believes the proposal fits with the surrounding area,
but that he is concerned with the lots directly adjacent to the existing R1-18 zoning
district. Mr. Tate stated that the site plan concentrates a significant amount of open
space along that edge of the development to create a buffer and that the development
has an appropriate density gradient.
Committee Member Powell asked if the developer would be widening Cave Creek
Road to three southbound lanes and if there would be a change to the northbound
lanes. Mr. Tate replied that the developer would be widening the southbound side to
three lanes, but that the northbound lanes would be up to a future developer on the east
side of Cave Creek Road.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the stipulated bus stop and if there was bus
service along Cave Creek Road today. Mr. Tate replied that he didn’t believe there was
existing bus service on that corridor but that it is likely stipulated because of the
potential for future service.
Committee Member Hankins asked about the dam to the north of the project and the
remote-control air strip on the other side of the dam. Chair Bowser noted that the
question about the dam was not a land use issue. Mr. Tate replied that the remote-
control air strip doesn’t require notification, but that they would disclose the existence of
the air strip to future residents. Chair Bowser agreed that it is better to disclose it.
Mr. Powell asked if the apartments would have electric vehicle charging stations
installed. Mr. Tate stated that they would be provided, as this is now considered an
expectation in luxury buildings.
Committee Member Israel asked about the community outreach conducted. Mr. Tate
replied that they had conducted the required notifications and neighborhood meetings
and had individual conversations with neighbors to address concerns.
Mr. Israel asked if the 3-story buildings would have elevators and what the cost for
electric vehicle charging would be. Mr. Tate replied that the buildings would be walk-ups
and that the electric vehicle charging cost to the tenants is minimal and only covers the
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 605
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 3
cost of the electricity, not generating profit for the developer.
Mr. Nowell asked about the density when the hillside area is subtracted from the
calculation. Mr. Tate replied that it would be 4.25 units per acre. Mr. Nowell followed up
by asking if it made more sense to be less dense closer to the preserve. Mr. Tate
agreed and stated that the development provides its largest lots and lowest densities
along the edge of the preserve, creating a desirable density gradient between the
eastern and western edges of the property.
Public Comments
Denny Hasenbank introduced himself and stated that he had moved to the
neighborhood because of the larger lots and that 80 percent of the residents are
opposed to the development. He stated that the development economics doesn’t work
out without the apartment component and that he is concerned about the minimal
architectural styling and the effect of the development on surrounding property values.
Robert Funk introduced himself and stated that adding 400 rental units is a problem, as
it would result in over 1,000 people living there. He stated that residents of this area
want single-family housing, noting that residents have made comments about
infrastructure and schools. He stated he wants to enjoy the lower density of the area.
Jeff Karau introduced himself and stated that he was concerned about the connecting
streets, which require a half-mile drive within the existing subdivision. He stated that he
suggests removing the stub street connections. He further stated that there are no
three-story buildings along this stretch of Cave Creek Road and that he believes the
height is a problem.
William Langdon introduced himself and asked about floodplain issues and stated
concerns about traffic on Hillstone Way. He asked whether a new development would
be on the adjacent hillside area. He stated that traffic on Cave Creek Road is a problem
and that there is too much density in the area. He further stated concerns about
schools.
Joe Abrahamson introduced himself and stated that the density is getting too high in
this area. He stated that he didn’t move to this area to have apartments nearby and that
they didn’t need those types of buildings in this area.
Marcy Mevorach introduced herself and stated that the population is growing and
Phoenix needs to accommodate the growth with new development. She stated that the
existing communities also had to clear vacant land, noting that eventually every piece of
land will be developed. She stated that she believes the developer is proposing a good
product.
Mead Summer introduced himself and stated that the community had argued against
the three-story request for the other multifamily development in this area and the
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 606
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 4
committee agreed to limit it to two stories. He stated that Cave Creek Road has a lot of
traffic and it’s not safe to add more, further stating concern about the stub street
connections to the existing subdivision.
Lauren Prole introduced herself and stated that she is concerned about the density of
the proposal and that Desert Peak Parkway already has a lot of traffic. She stated that
the roads are getting busier and unsafe for children. She stated that she believes
schools are an issue as well.
Brian Wilson introduced himself and stated he was concerned with the connections to
the stub streets into the existing subdivision, which doesn’t add value to the existing
residents since the new development would be gated. He stated that it would be an
expense to the existing community to take down fencing.
Z. Prole introduced himself and stated that he is concerned about the traffic generated
from the proposed project.
Chair Bowser stated that it was important to note the correct information about the
schools in the area and that the schools are under capacity.
Applicant Response
Benjamin Tate stated that the development is driven by what the General Plan calls for,
not simply economics. He stated that the connection to the stub streets is not driven by
the developer, rather by requirements of the Street Transportation Department, and that
the applicant would work with the City to see if they can make the connections
emergency only. He stated the development team had a meeting with the school
superintendent to discuss school needs and that there was no need for a new school
since the school are not at capacity. He stated that the vast majority of the traffic from
the site will be southbound and that the multifamily buildings will be over a mile from any
of the homes in the existing subdivision, where neighbors have concerns.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that the committee tries to keep the zoning similar to the
surrounding area and that the proposal fits. He stated that adding people will drive
demand for new commercial uses and that he understood the desire to limit the
development to two stories.
Chair Bowser stated that the grade of Cave Creek Road is another factor to consider.
MOTION – GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to recommend approval of GPA-DSTV-1-22-2.
Committee Member Hankins seconded the motion.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 607
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 5
VOTE
7-2, motion to recommend approval passed; Members Dean, Hankins, Israel, Powell,
Santoro, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Members Nowell and Reynolds against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 608
Attachment D
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
June 2, 2022
ITEM NO: 6
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Location: Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave
Creek Road and Jomax Road
From: Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Parks/Open Space -
Publicly Owned
To: Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre and
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 29.48
Proposal: A Minor General Plan Amendment to allow development of garden-style
multifamily residential development (15+ dwelling units per acre) and
casita-style single-family duplex rental residences (10 to 15 dwelling units
per acre).
Applicant: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Owner: Arizona State Land Trust
Representative: Jason, Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 5/3/2022 Approval. Vote: 7-2.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Desert View Village Planning
Committee recommendation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Gaynor made a MOTION to approve GPA-DSTV-1-22-2, per the
Desert View Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Gaynor
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Howard and Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 10 to 15
dwelling units per acre and Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre would allow higher
density attached townhouses, condos, or apartments, which do not conflict with the
land uses in the surrounding area.
2. The companion rezoning case, Z-6-22-2, proposes a single-family and multifamily
residential development, which, as stipulated, protects the character of the surrounding
Page 609
area by concentrating density along Cave Creek Road, an arterial street, and away
from the undisturbed hillside portion of the development
3. The subject site is appropriate for residential uses at the proposed densities and
provides new housing opportunities in this part of the city. Furthermore, the
development has adequate street access and provides various opportunities for
recreation to future residents.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 610
Attachment E
Anthony M Grande
From: Tom Bonanno
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 7:40 PM
To: Anthony M Grande; Tom Bonanno
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)…
Hi Anthony,
I live immediately West of the proposed new Development. I understand the Village planning committee is asked to
amend the current DR Horton rezoning application to approve an additional 400 rental units on approximately 20
acres. Those 400 units allow over 1,000 people to be living in those units. This zoning request which should never be
approved. Please take the time to drive around the area as see how it is all singe‐family homes. Everyone of us wants to
remain that way. VOTE NO on the amendment.
Thank you,
Tom Bonanno
M: 602.743.9200
Page 611
Anthony M Grande
From: Sarah Crank
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 9:14 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA-DSTV-e-22-2 amendment. As a resident of this area I strongly object to the addition of 400
rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional 1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the
neighborhood. My community is less than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the value,
the character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly object to the committee
approving 400 rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Stone Butte Homeowner
Sarah Crank
sarahcrank@me.com
480.236.6232
Page 612
Anthony M Grande
From: Robert Funk
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:27 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case Z-6-22-2
Dear Anthony,
II want to go on record as strongly objecting to the proposed amendment for 400 Rental Units. A year ago my family
purchased a house in Stone Butte North that was developed by D R Horton with zoning for 1.9 houses per acre. The
zoning application next to us by the same developer will be more than double my density.
D R Hortons Rezoning Application (Case Z‐4‐6‐22‐2) is more than dense enough for this area with out adding 400 rental
units onto it. If you approve this amendment the Village Planning Committee you will not be serving the best interests
of the neighboring developments.
Please VOTE NO.
Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows
Page 613
Anthony M Grande
From: Bruce Gross
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:23 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: Bruce Gross
Subject: RE: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 Hearing
Dear Anthony,
I'm Bruce Gross and my single-family house is immediately to the west of this D R
Horton proposed development. I live in Desert Peak. I purchased my house and moved
in November 2017, to live in a nice neighborhood with the low density that my
community provides. It is also what the other communities are like around me.
I understand the Village planning committee is asked to amend the current D R Horton
rezoning application to approve an additional 400 rental units on approximately 20
acres. 400 units will allow over 1,000 people to be living in those units, plus D R Horton
want to also build a 2-story apartment complex.
Aside from destroying our “desert space” to walk-in, the impact on water and especially
getting on to Cave Creek, which is already like driving on a freeway, will make life here
in our community horrific. I hope you will consider denying this Amendment and
PLEASE VOTE NO.
Please think of our community as if you lived here as well.
Respectfully submitted,
Bruce Gross
Desert Peak owner
Bruce Gross
"Tell me and I forget.
Teach me and I remember.
Page 614
Involve me and I learn." Benjamin Franklin
Page 615
Anthony M Grande
From: Harold B. Jones, Jr.
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:41 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
I am writing in to express my opposition to the amendment of DR Horton’s application for the "Stone Butte East"
development.
I am not opposed to their original plan of 3 homes per acre, but now I hear they want to include 140
rental homes and a 260-unit apartment building which is entirely unacceptable to me. I bought my single
family home in Stone Butte believing we would see other single family homes in the future. That density
of rental homes and apartments simply do not belong in this area; we do not have the roadway capacity
nor the retail business to handle that additional population. I am convinced it will negatively affect my
quality of life, the quiet enjoyment of my home, and the valuation of my property.
Please, please do not approve their request for an amendment.
Best Regards,
Harold & Angie Jones
24218 N 22nd Street
Phoenix, AZ 85024
480-305-3328
Page 616
Anthony M Grande
From: N J
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 2:31 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Desert Peak VPC , D.R. Horton rezoning GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case Z-6-22-2)
Hello,
I live immediately west of the proposed new development by DR Horton on Desert Peak Parkway and Cave Creek Road.
I understand the village planning committee has been requested to amend the rezoning application to approve
additional rental units (D.R. Horton rezoning GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 ‐ Companion case Z‐6‐22‐2). This planned development
will significantly increase the traffic in the neighborhood and cause a lot of challenges.
DR Horton communities in Stoneview Butte North has a density of less than two houses per acre. I invested my hard‐
earned money in this neighborhood because of the low density. Now the same developer is requesting an amendment
to their rezoning application to add 400 rentals. This will more than double the density.
We strongly object to this rezoning request and recommend voting No to the amendment.
Regards
Nilesh Joshi
2108 E Chama Dr Phoenix AZ
Page 617
Anthony M Grande
From: Chris Smith
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 8:55 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA-DSTV-e-22-2 amendment. As a resident of this area I
strongly object to the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional
1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less
than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the
value, the character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density
neighborhood and strongly object to the committee approving 400 rental units in addition to the single
family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Chris Smith
Page 618
Anthony M Grande
From: William Wiltse
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 7:10 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
To Whom it May Concern,
We are relatively new homeowners in the Northview at Stone Butte neighborhood, directly west of the proposed
development referenced in case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2. I understand that the Village committee will be discussing a
proposed amendment that would allow for the building of 400 rental properties within the development. I purchased
my home in this area because of the large lot size and low density of homes. These rental units would not only have a
negative effect on nearby home values, it would also dramatically increase the amount of vehicular traffic on Cave Creek
Road. We have already noticed increased congestion in the short time since we have lived here and have concerns that
the rental units, in addition to all of the new single‐family homes, will cause this to become significantly worse.
These rental units were not part of the original neighborhood plan and should not be approved. Please consider the
impact on homeowners in the area and vote NO on this amendment.
Thank you for your consideration,
Bill & Angie Wiltse
2127 E Fallen Leaf Lane
Page 619
Anthony M Grande
From: joe@joea.com
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 6:31 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Developement hearing
I am very much opposed to this and would like to RTS for this meeting. This is just North of where I have lived for 22+
years.
Thanks,
Joe Abrahamson
Phoenix 85024
~~~~~
From: Sarah Crank
Date: April 30, 2022 at 9:13:02 AM MST
To: Bridgette Wilde
Subject: Village Planning Committee meeting *Action requested* - New Development by DR Horton
DR Horton is proposing a new "Stone Butte East" development which will be located between Northview and the Desert
Peak neighborhood to our east. They had originally applied for residential zoning permitting 3 homes per acre (our zoning
only allows for 1.95) but now they are looking to amend their application to include 140 rental homes and a 260-unit
apartment building which would increase that homes per acre significantly. There is an upcoming virtual meeting on May
3rd @ 6:30pm where neighbors can object to the amendment. If you would like to attend, comment, or speak at the
meeting, details can be found here: https://www.phoenix.gov/city.../PublicMeetings/220503004.pdf
Submit a comment on an agenda item:
Send your comments to: Anthony Grande at anthony.grande@phoenix.gov
By: 48 hours prior to start of the meeting - DEADLINE Sunday May1st 6:30 pm
Indicate Item Number and case number:
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Page 620
Anthony M Grande
From: jbbrabender@comcast.net
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:46 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case 2-6-22-2)
Please vote no. The area should be zoned single family residential which is consistent with the surrounding
neighborhood. I am a home owner in the North View at Stone Butte community. Thank you.
Jim Brabender
Sent from my iPhone
Page 621
Anthony M Grande
From: adesmond1
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 3:48 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert Peak VPC,
We live immediately West of this proposed new Development. The additional 400 units would impose higher traffic
volume, a basis for lower demographics to enter the area, and the area is not prepared to manage this volume and type
of household/residences. As residences of the community we experience daily issues that arise and will change with a
higher volume of people, i.e. taking our child to school; Cave Creak Dam Rd is our most direct route to access the
elementary and middle school, and cannot we widened due to homes already built. This is also a route for people to
commute to Deer Valley Road for work. As is may be possible to eventually connect Pinnacle Peak Parkway to 7th
Street, this will significantly increase traffic into our neighborhood from surrounding areas to reach other areas like
Norterra Shopping or I‐17. Obviously with this we will now be hindered with widening of streets to allow for the traffic,
leading to intersections with lights, delaying leaving and entry into the community.
As an example this happened on Norterra Parkway and North Valley Parkway and 19th avenue where two upper scale
neighborhoods of Dynamite Mountain Ranch and Fireside were suddenly built up with apartments, lowering the
demographics and increasing traffic which resulted in an intersection with a signal, included widening the road, that led
to be a common detour for people needing to avoid I‐17, not to mention increasing accidents in the neighborhood
resulting in a pedestrian being killed in what used to be a quiet, family‐oriented, safe neighborhood.
Overall growth is good, as the community CAN safely grow, with different levels of demographics which lead to
commerce that can support the surrounding area, but at this point it is difficult to see how this can be achieved as the
beautiful desert area is quickly being consumed by multilevel housing projects. Part of our investment was closing to
live outside of town and the congestion, hence investing the large sum of money to reside in a gated community. This
proposal is poorly planned as limited commerce is currently available, roads are not developed, and quite simply it will
change the landscape of our community for families hiking and riding. Multifamily dwellings such as apartments and
condominiums lead to increased crime and lower value of all surrounding neighborhoods. Transitory residents will not
be invested in our community.
Lastly, speaking of investment, the desert preserve and surrounding desert areas is another reason why we selected this
area to invest in our residence and call this our home. Not to watch it be monopolized by while DR Horton who sold lots
as a premium to us, finished selling our community, only to now submit a proposal for a new cash cow as they consume
the environment surrounding our investment with temporary low end housing with the goal of putting as many people
as possible in as small of a space as possible to make the most money. If they could would they build 4 story units rather
than just 2? When does it end? When we no longer have any mountain view and it is all a parking lot?
So as one development builds it will set the tone for more to follow. Please help us protect our property values and the
surrounding area, in keeping this community a quiet, safe, family‐oriented, home‐valued neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Ron and Andrea Desmond
2028 E Chama Dr
Phoenix, AZ 85024
(602)332‐3210
Page 622
Anthony M Grande
From: Karen Harding
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:25 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Desert View GPA Case # GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 Rezoning Case No: Z-6-22-2
Dear Mr. Grande,
As a new property owner in Stone Butte I’m writing to voice my disapproval with the proposed re‐zoning. I love my new
neighborhood and enjoy the privacy.
The proposed re‐zoning development will cause an increase in traffic, add to the air pollution, air quality and bring
excess noise. I oppose the concentration of housing you want to create. I don’t understand the need to change the
original zoning that was previously approved. The schools are already overflowing with students especially Pinnacle
High School.
I believe the zoning of the property in question should remain as is and not be changed.
My husband, William Langdon, would like to speak at your meeting. Thank you for your attention to this important
matter.
Karen Harding
William Langdon
1942 E Robb Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Will’s cell phone: 602‐549‐3948
Karen’s cell phone: 602‐330‐3743
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad [overview.mail.yahoo.com]
Page 623
Anthony M Grande
From: Matthew Harmon
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 2:13 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: Tara Harmon
Subject: Note regarding case GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 amendment. As a resident of this area I strongly object to
the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional 1000+ residents would
significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less than 2 houses per acre currently and the
addition of this amendment would significantly change the value, the character and the quiet nature of the
neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly object to the committee approving 400
rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Matt Harmon
Stone Butte Homeowner
Matt Harmon, Dealer Marketing Consultant
General Motors CSSR – Western Region
Text / Mobile: 425-309-1229
epsilon.com [epsilon.com]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Disclaimer The information in this email and any attachments may contain proprietary and confidential information that
is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, retention or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. When addressed to our clients or
vendors, any information contained in this e‐mail or any attachments is subject to the terms and conditions in any
governing contract. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please immediately contact the sender and delete the e‐
mail.
Page 624
Anthony M Grande
From: Jill Smith
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:37 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Opposition to GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA‐DSTV‐e‐22‐2 amendment. As a resident of this area (Stone Butte
North) I strongly object to the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex.
This additional 1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less
than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the value, the
character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly
object to the committee approving 400 rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Jill Smith
Page 625
Anthony M Grande
From: Kamal Jagga <1.kamal.j@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 12:47 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Action Request: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2) - I Vote No!
Dear Desert Peak PVC,
I live immediately west of this proposed new development. We bought this property because of the low population
density, healthy and safe environment for the families. Building this additional units will impact negatively the peaceful
and serene environment of our area. We strongly object to the Committee approving 400 rental units.
GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 (Companion Case Z‐6‐22‐2) ‐ I VOTE NO!
Thank you for understanding!
Regards
Kamal JAGGA
‐‐
Regards,
Kamal Jagga
Page 626
Anthony M Grande
From: Greg Pelegrin
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:17 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View Village Planning Committee,
I am a home owner adjacent to the proposed Stone Butte East development and moved into the area due to the open
space and fact that our development is less than 2 homes per acre. D.R. Horton already has zoning to build up to 5
homes per acre which is very dense for the area so why would this even be a consideration for 15+ units per acre? This is
the far north suburbs of Phoenix and the lack of transit options and nearby businesses does not warrant apartment style
housing in the area.
The other consideration for such a large number of homes being built per acre is the stress on the local infrastructure.
There are only 2 access points into and out of the proposed new development and that would lead to very heavy traffic
on both Cave Creek Rd and Desert Peak Pkwy. Also, the extra demand on current sewer and water lines and the
electrical grid in the area with 1000+ extra people living in the new proposed development.
Finally, there is already a lack of large parks and play areas for the children in the area as well as schools near capacity.
Has the project added enough room for play areas for children and room to add an additional school as needed?
Please leave this area that is zoned for single family homes the way it is to prevent much of the crowding that is
becoming more prevalent in many of the new D.R. Horton developments already built or are in the process of being built
in the Phoenix Valley.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Greg and Jaime Pelegrin
Page 627
Anthony M Grande
From: Ruffulo, Wendy
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:27 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (companion case Z-6-22-2)
We just recently purchased a Shea home just west of this planned new development. This area is all single family homes
which is one of the reasons why we selected this development. Single family homes is what we thought may be
developed, not apartments. Please vote NO.
Thank you
Get Outlook for iOS [aka.ms]
Page 628
Anthony M Grande
From: Lukas Treffers
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:44 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Good afternoon Desert Peak VPC,
I am writing you today in regards to the proposed new Development by DR Horton which includes 400 rental units. This
community primarily consists of single family homes and is one of the main reasons we chose to move here. There is low
traffic, minimal noise, and limited light pollution. With this potential addition of 400 units all of that goes out the
window. There will be an increase in traffic (accidents), noise and light pollution. This zoning request should not be
considered, myself and my fellow neighbors and community are against this. VOTE NO on this amendment.
Thank you for your time.
‐ Lukas
Page 629
Anthony M Grande
From: Tommy Ford
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:08 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Mr. Grande:
DR Horton did grading for the Northview Stone Butte several years ago and then Shea took over and started building new
homes. The 130 home gated community of Northview, is a quiet and removed area that we were drawn to almost 2 years
ago. We picked our lot, with delays it took over 1 1/2 years to finally close and move into our new home. Now almost a
month later, we are enjoying the quiet and simple life in our new community.
One of the primary reasons for buying in Northview, was the lack of traffic once you turn onto Pinnacle Peak and head
West. The area has nice homes built several years ago and only two condo complexes. We bought in Northview in part to
not live on a busy street, that would be more congested with both people, cars and noise. The area we live in is largely
homes, and is without rental apartments. Rental apartments will decrease the value of our new home, increase traffic and
congestion on Pinnacle Peak/Desert Peak, and bring a population of people who do not care about our homes and
values. We have nothing against people wanting, needing to live in apartments but they should be built in areas that
already have apartments/condos not in true residential neighborhoods.
We respectfully request to the Committee to not approve the 400 rental units, VOTE NO PLEASE.
Sincerely,
Tommy & Caroline Ford
2017 E Fallen Leaf Lane,
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Page 630
Anthony M Grande
From: Jes
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 1:40 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: jim.warning@phoenix.gov; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Stone Butte East (case nos Z-6-22 & GPA-DSTV-1-22)
To Whom it May Concern;
The upcoming plans for the development designated as "Stone Butte East" by DR Horton, creates multiple concerns for
existing residents in the neighboring areas. Desert Peak has maintained a family safe environment with low traffic,
unobstructed desert views, and a reasonable level of population. The addition of this monstrous development invades
the peacefulness that drew many of us to this area.
The following concerns exist for the majority of the current homeowners.
New construction will drive wildlife into our neighborhoods and backyards, creating dangers for our children, pets, and
ourselves.
Plans show through streets from our existing neighborhood roads and cul de sacs to the new neighborhoods, robbing us
of these areas and creating safety concerns.
The current traffic on Cave Creek is already difficult to navigate through without the addition of 4k plus new vehicles.
The plans call for a small area of Cave Creek to be widened, showing a futile attempt to appease the matter.
The continued growth of multi‐family residential areas is not something any of the current residents support.
Local schools are not equipped to support the massive spike in new residents.
Jessica White
Page 631
Racelle Escolar
From: J Karau
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 4:47 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Public comment for June 2 meeting case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Attachments: Jeff - Planning Commission Comments.docx
I am writing regarding case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 and companion case Z‐6‐22‐2. I have registered to speak but also wanted
to include a written comment with additional references. There is an old related case ( Z‐8‐04‐2 (PHO‐1‐15) ) from 2015
as well as a Google Maps link [google.com] to existing streets that dead‐ends just outside of our community.
Thanks,
Jeff
Page1 632
Racelle Escolar
From: Deanne Haverlock
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 11:24 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Re: Application Z-6-22-2 (Companion Case GPA-DSTV-1-22-2) #7
Sorry, wanted to be clear I oppose item #6 and 7 re: above application in my previous email.
Thanks!
Deanne Haverlock
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 2, 2022, at 9:56 AM, Deanne Haverlock
>
>
> Hello,
> I would like to submit comment on above agenda item for re‐zoning and oppose the proposal. I am a resident in the
area and believe it’s desirable to keep the trust land open for nature and wildlife and keep the possible building on it to
a minimum to preserve the the beauty of our area.
>
> Thanks for your consideration and time.
> Respectfully,
> Deanne Haverlock
> Sent from my iPhone
Page1 633
Rcvd 6/2/2022
Desert Peak Homeowners Association
A Non-Profit Corporation
pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov
Dear Planning Commission Members,
We are writing today as the board of directors of the Desert Peak HOA, a neighboring community of 641
homes to the South of the proposed DR Horton community of Stone Butte East. During the Desert View
Village Planning Committee meeting neither the voices of the neighboring communities nor past
decisions by the Planning Commission were given much consideration before rushing to approve the
zoning changes in favor of the new community. The proposed Stone Butte East community is for the
area of over 400 acres west of Cave Creek Road and south of Jomax Road (case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 and
companion case Z-6-22-2). We strongly oppose DR Horton’s rezoning application without additional
changes.
The Desert Peak HOA and our community residents have concerns with the changes to the character of
the area with the height of the new community and concerns of traffic mainly within our community but
also in the surrounding area.
The first concern is for the overall character of the area by adding such dense new construction. During
DR Horton’s presentation they stated that the new community is a “mirror image” and just like they
“unfolded the page of a book” of the existing communities to the south. That is FALSE! The existing
communities consist of one and two-story homes, condos and apartments which fit in with the density
of the homes in the surrounding area when they were built.
In this zoning proposal DR Horton is asking for three-story buildings along Cave Creek Rd. which would
change the character of the area and set a precedent for other new communities in the future. Today,
there are NO existing three-story buildings along Cave Creek Rd. north of the 101. The residents of
multiple surrounding neighborhoods, including Desert Peak, are strongly opposed to setting the
precedent for three-story buildings in this area.
Back in 2015 a similar case was brought before the Planning commission for consideration regarding a
new apartment community at the corner of Cave Creek and Pinnacle Peak. This former rezoning case
was also brought by the same builder and was similarly seeking to build three-story apartment buildings
along Cave Creek Road. That proposal was modified to allow only two-story apartments and we ask that
you do the same in this case. The prior case for Desert Peak & Cave creek apartment was Z-8-04-2
(PHO-1-15).
Our second concern is related to the connection of the streets in the new gated community with the
streets of Desert Peak. There are three streets that are proposed to be connected to the new
community, East Rustling Oaks Ln, North 27th Pl, and North 29th Way. DR Horton has agreed to
Page 634
pedestrian access between the communities which we agree with and already have fencing with
pedestrian access at ends of those streets to support.
The issues arise due to the fact that the new community is gated so there is a one-sided benefit for the
new Stone Butte community to having vehicular ingress/egress within our community. We believe the
goals of the Complete Street Policy are fulfilled by the pedestrian gates and adding one-way access from
a private, gated community will not provide any additional benefit. If vehicle gates are required, Desert
Peak would have to pay to remove that existing fencing and pedestrian access even though we receive
no benefit from the vehicular connection. Two of the proposed connecting streets (Rustling Oaks Ln and
27th Pl) are nearly ½ mile of driving through Desert Peak to get to either major road, Cave Creek Rd or
Desert Peak Pkwy and we do not wish for our community to act as a ½ mile driveway for Stone Butte
East. This plan would add additional traffic within Desert Peak, cost the Desert Peak HOA/community
and provide no benefit to the Desert Peak community.
We disputed the facts that DR Horton claimed that this MUST be done in accordance with policy from
the Street Transportation department, but the concern was dismissed. In fact, when DR Horton built
our community of Desert Peak, they did the same thing with an existing community to the south. In that
case 25th St. was left as a dead end and the area within Desert Peak is used as a common area park. The
children in both communities enjoy walking/biking through this area for school and connecting the
neighbors. This area is just to the north of N. 25th St. and E. Casitas Del Rio Dr. (Google Maps link). We
ask that the connecting streets be removed from the plan and allow the streets of Desert Peak to remain
unchanged.
Lastly, we have serious concerns about DR Horton’s traffic study and statements that the community
will only generate additional southbound traffic and shouldn’t be a concern with adding an additional
1500+ homes. There are several streets in the area which are in need of improvement to handle the
existing traffic and adding more homes will only make matters worse. One of the areas of concern are
the bridge north of E. Lone Cactus Dr where Cave Creek narrows to 2 lanes, causing backups to Rose
Garden during high traffic hours. The intersection of Cave Creek Rd. and Pinnacle Peak to the east is
also an area of concern. Heading westbound at this intersection there are frequent backups to the
National cemetery entrance because the left turn lane is limited and there is no right turn lane. While
we understand the approach of having developers improve the areas along those roads as they are built,
we’d like to see a plan to handle the additional traffic in existing areas.
Sincerely,
Desert Peak HOA Board of Directors
Brian Wilson, President Jeff Karau, Vice President
Bruce Gross, Treasurer Lauren Prole, Secretary
John Tishuck, Director Jessica Noto, Director
Dave Dahm, Director
Page 635
Racelle Escolar
From: Margaret Rehberg
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:57 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Stone butte east
Good Afternoon
We live in Desert Peak on Rustling Oaks Ln and will be greatly impacted by the travel to Stone Butte east. They must
install a road with their own access. We will become a heavy traveled parking lot and for what?
Page1 636
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-6-22-2 - Approximately 2,400 Feet Southwest
of the Southwest Corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road (Ordinance G-
7006)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-6-22-2
and rezone the site from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to R1-10 (Single-
Family Residence District), R-2 (Multifamily Residence District) and R-3A (Multifamily
Residence District) to allow single-family and multifamily residential. This is a
companion case to GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 and must be heard following GPA-DSTV-1-22-2.
Summary
Current Zoning: S-1
Proposed Zoning: R1-10 (388.10 acres), R-2 (14.19 acres) and R-3A (15.04 acres)
Acreage: 417.33 acres
Proposed Use: Single-family and multifamily residential.
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Applicant: DR Horton, Inc.
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 3,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a 6-3 vote.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Desert View Village Planning Committee
recommendation with modifications and an additional stipulation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and
Jomax Road.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: None
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
contributions are addressed in new Stipulation No. 25
All added and modified stipulations, since the Planning Commission recommendation,
are in bold font and listed below.
Staff recommends approval, subject to the following updated stipulations:
OVERA LL SITE
1. Prior to the issuance· of Final Site Plan approval, the landowner shall convey
approximately 74 acres (or an area mutually agreed upon by the city and the owner) of
hillside land selected by the City of Phoenix and located in the area depicted as
"Hillside Area" on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022, to the City of Phoenix
for the use as a City of Phoenix desert park and/or mountain preserve, as modified
and approved by the Planning and Development Department and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
2. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department to
determine a maximum of two access points to the desert park or mountain preserve
area prior to issuance of preliminary site plan approval. The access points shall be
made accessible to the public through a trail network, within and/or bounding the site,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department. In conjunction
with the electric utility provider, the developer shall also explore the possibility of
providing a public access parking lot in the utility easement area with access to the
preserve trail network.
3. A minimum landscaped setback of 140 feet shall be provided along the Cave Creek
Road frontage.
4. The required landscape setbacks along Cave Creek Road, Desert Peak Parkway, and
the perimeter setbacks for the R-2 and R-3A zoned portions of the site where adjacent
to single-family residential zoning shall be planted with a minimum of 70 percent 2-inch
caliper and 30 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
5. Within the development and along Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway, all
pedestrian paths, multi-use trails, and sidewalks, excluding sidewalks along internal
streets, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at maturity, or a combination of
the two to provide a minimum of 75 percent shade, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
6. The developer shall dedicate 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easements (MUTE) along the
east side of Desert Peak Parkway and the west side of Cave Creek Road and
construct a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the easements in
accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall
work with the Site Planning Section on an alternative design through the technical
appeal process.
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
7. The developer shall construct minimum 10-foot-wide community trails and multi-use
trails, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department. Where
conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with the Site Planning Section
on an alternative design through the technical appeal process.
8. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad along
southbound Cave Creek Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according to the
from the intersection of the main access point on Cave Creek Road according to City
of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department or the Public Transit Department.
9. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a
minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area between the back of curb and sidewalk along
Cave Creek Road, planted to the following standards and as approved or modified by
the Planning and Development Department or Street Transportation Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. The developer shall construct minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks with minimum
5-foot-wide landscape areas between the back of curb and sidewalks along the
primary roadway through the subdivision, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails
Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022, planted with minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees,
25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved or modified by the Planning
and Development Department. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work
with the Planning and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate 65 feet of right-of-way along Cave Creek Road, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. The developer shall construct a 24-foot-wide landscaped median island along Desert
Peak Parkway from Hillstone Way to 23rd Street, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
13. The developer shall align the primary roadway through the subdivision with the
intersection of Desert Peak Parkway and Hillstone Way and shall be responsible for
any modifications to the existing drainage facility and access ramp, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
14. The developer shall connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane, 27th
Place, and 29th Way, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022,
BUT SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY and as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.ADDITIONALLY, THE
DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AT THE ABOVE
REFERENCED STREET STUBS TO FACILITATE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE EXISTING DESERT PEAK
NEIGHBORHOOD.
15. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a Cave Creek Road
Traffic Corridor Analysis from Sonoran Desert Drive south to the 101 Freeway to
evaluate the overall level of service and corridor conditions with impacts associated
with the proposed 1,545 dwelling units. The developer shall be responsible for regional
mitigation identified through the analysis. No preliminary approval of plans shall be
granted until the study is reviewed and approved by the Street Transportation
Department.
16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
17. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix for
the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney prior to final site plan
approval.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed development
from the FAA pursuant to the FAA's Form-7460 obstruction analysis review process,
prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of the
property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the templates
and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney.
20. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall conduct
Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the development
area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing and grubbing,
landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
21. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I data
testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, determines
such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II
archeological data recovery excavations.
22. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.
23. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
24. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE
DOCUMENTATION THAT ADDRESSES THE FOLLOWING AS MODIFIED AND
APPROVED BY THE WATER SERVICES AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTS:
• THAT ALL HOMES IN THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE DESIGNED AND
CERTIFIED THROUGH THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S
WATERSENSE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.
• A COMMITMENT TO HAVE THE DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATE IN THE
CITY'S HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION WATER EFFICIENCY PROGRAM.
• THE UTILIZATION OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT VEGETATION
THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT.
• IRRIGATION RESTRICTIONS FOR UNDISTURBED AND OPEN SPACE
AREAS.
• UTILIZATION OF AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS AND SMART
CONTROLLERS.
• A COMMITMENT TO UNDERGO REGULAR WATER LEAK DETECTION
AUDITS TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY AND EFFICIENCY OF THE
IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
• A SUMMARY OF RESTRICTIONS ON THE UTILIZATION OF TURF WITHIN
THE DEVELOPMENT.
25. THE DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS), INCLUDING
A CAVE CREEK ROAD TRAFFIC CORRIDOR ANALYSIS FROM SONORAN
DESERT DRIVE SOUTH TO THE 101 FREEWAY TO EVALUATE THE OVERALL
LEVEL OF SERVICE AND CORRIDOR CONDITIONS WITH IMPACTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED 1,545 DWELLING UNITS. THE DEVELOPER
SHALL CONTRIBUTE TO REGIONAL TRAFFIC MITIGATION MPROVEMENTS
IDENTIFIED IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. ANY CONTRIBUTIONS SHALL BE
FAIRLY RELATED TO THE TRAFFIC IMPACT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AS
MODIFIED OR APPPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION AND
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS. CONTRIBUTIONS FOR
ELIGIBLE INFRASTRUCTURE ALREADY IDENTIFIED IN THE ADOPTED
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLAN MAY BE UTILIZED AS AN IMPACT FEE
CREDIT. NO PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PLANS SHALL BE GRANTED UNTIL
THE STUDY IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.
R1-10 ZONED AREA
24- Building elevations shall depict architectural detailing applied to windows on all sides
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
26. of the homes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
� A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area for the R1-1O zoned portion of the site,
27. after dedication of the hillside area to the city, shall be retained as open space,
including washes and internal hillside areas, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. This requirement shall not be applied to individual phases
of the overall development.
2&. A minimum of two distinct active open space areas and a minimum of three passive
28. open space areas shall be provided within the overall R1-10 zoned area, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
R-2 ZONED AREA
� The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations date
29. stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
2-8-:- A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
30. including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
� There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as but not
31. limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground equipment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
� The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City of
32. Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U-and/or artistic bicycle racks shall
be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the
clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
R-3A ZONED AREA
� The development shall be in general conformance with the CASITAS OR GARDEN
33. building elevations date stamped February 4, 2022, OR THE BUILDING
ELEVATIONS JUNE 27, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department AND AS MODIFIED BY THE STIPULATIONS BELOW.
� A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
34. including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
� There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as but not
35. limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or. playground equipment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
� The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City of
36. Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U-and/or artistic bicycle racks shall
be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
� THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF
37. TWO STORIES, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.
Enclosures:
Exhibit 1: Building Elevations date stamped June 27, 2022
Approved:
Al;n
�;&2_
tephenson __,,
Deputy City Manager/Planning and Development Director
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-6-22-2) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R1-10 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT), R-2 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT), AND R-3A
(MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of 417.33-acre site located approximately 2,400 feet
southwest of the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road in a portion of
Sections 1, 2, and 11, Township 4 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in
Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from 417.33 acres of “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence
District), to 388.10 acres of “R1-10” (Single-Family Residence District), 14.19 acres of “R-
2” (Multifamily Residence District), and 15.04 acres of “R-3A” (Multifamily Residence
District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to modify
the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification change as
shown in Exhibit “B.”
Page 639
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use district
applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations, violation
of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance:
OVERALL SITE
1. Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan approval, the landowner shall convey
approximately 74 acres (or an area mutually agreed upon by the city and the
owner) of hillside land selected by the City of Phoenix and located in the area
depicted as “Hillside Area” on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022, to
the City of Phoenix for the use as a City of Phoenix desert park and/or
mountain preserve, as modified and approved by the Planning and
Development Department and the Parks and Recreation Department.
2. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department to determine a maximum of two access points to the desert park or
mountain preserve area prior to issuance of preliminary site plan approval. The
access points shall be made accessible to the public through a trail network,
within and/or bounding the site, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department. In conjunction with the electric utility provider, the
developer shall also explore the possibility of providing a public access parking
lot in the utility easement area with access to the preserve trail network.
3. A minimum landscaped setback of 140 feet shall be provided along the Cave
Creek Road frontage.
4. The required landscape setbacks along Cave Creek Road, Desert Peak
Parkway, and the perimeter setbacks for the R-2 and R-3A zoned portions of
the site where adjacent to single-family residential zoning shall be planted with
a minimum of 70 percent 2-inch caliper and 30 percent 3-inch caliper large
canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.
5. Within the development and along Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak
Parkway, all pedestrian paths, multi-use trails, and sidewalks, excluding
sidewalks along internal streets, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at
maturity, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75 percent
shade, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
6. The developer shall dedicate 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easements (MUTE)
along the east side of Desert Peak Parkway and the west side of Cave Creek
Road and construct a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the
easements in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved
Page 640
by the Planning and Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions
exist, the developer shall work with the Site Planning Section on an alternative
design through the technical appeal process.
7. The developer shall construct minimum 10-foot-wide community trails and
multi-use trails, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails Exhibit, date
stamped April 15, 2022, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer
shall work with the Site Planning Section on an alternative design through the
technical appeal process.
8. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad
along southbound Cave Creek Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed
according to the City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with a minimum depth
of 10 feet and be located from the intersection of the main access point on
Cave Creek Road according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department or the
Public Transit Department.
9. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a
minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area between the back of curb and sidewalk
along Cave Creek Road, planted to the following standards and as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department or Street
Transportation Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at
maturity.
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. The developer shall construct minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks with
minimum 5-foot-wide landscape areas between the back of curb and sidewalks
along the primary roadway through the subdivision, as generally depicted on
the Overall Trails Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022, planted with minimum
2-inch caliper shade trees, 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department. Where
utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate 65 feet of right-of-way along Cave Creek Road,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 641
12. The developer shall construct a 24-foot-wide landscaped median island along
Desert Peak Parkway from Hillstone Way to 23rd Street, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The developer shall align the primary roadway through the subdivision with the
intersection of Desert Peak Parkway and Hillstone Way and shall be
responsible for any modifications to the existing drainage facility and access
ramp, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
14. The developer shall connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane,
27th Place, and 29th Way, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February
4, 2022 , but shall be restricted to emergency access only and as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department. Additionally, the
developer shall provide pedestrian access at the above referenced street stubs
to facilitate pedestrian circulation between the development and the existing
Desert Peak neighborhood.
15. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a Cave Creek
Road Traffic Corridor Analysis from Sonoran Desert Drive south to the 101
Freeway to evaluate the overall level of service and corridor conditions with
impacts associated with the proposed 1,545 dwelling units. The developer shall
be responsible for regional mitigation identified through the analysis. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and
approved by the Street Transportation Department.
16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
17. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to
the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney.
20. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
Page 642
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
21. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
22. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
23. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
R1-10 ZONED AREA
24. Building elevations shall depict architectural detailing applied to windows on all
sides of the homes, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
25. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area for the R1-10 zoned portion of
the site, after dedication of the hillside area to the city, shall be retained as
open space, including washes and internal hillside areas, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. This requirement shall not be applied
to individual phases of the overall development.
26. A minimum of two distinct active open space areas and a minimum of three
passive open space areas shall be provided within the overall R1-10 zoned
area, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
R-2 ZONED AREA
27. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
28. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open
space, including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
29. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as
but not limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground
equipment, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 643
30. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the
bicycle racks shall be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per
unit, located near the clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed
per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
R-3A ZONED AREA
31. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department and as modified by the stipulations below.
32. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open
space, including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
33. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as
but not limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground
equipment, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
34. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the
bicycle racks shall be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per
unit, located near the clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed
per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
35. The development shall be limited to a maximum building height of two stories,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
Page 644
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 645
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-6-22-2
R1-10 PORTION
A portion of land being situated within Sections 2 and 11, Township 4 North, Range
3 East of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a found Brass Cap flush with sectional markings accepted as the
Southwest corner of said Section 2, from which a found pk nail with tag RLS 24513,
accepted as the West Quarter corner of said Section 11 thereof bears
South 00°08’39” West, 2633.00 feet;
Thence North 00°13'20" East, 2671.37 feet along the west line of the Southwest
quarter of said Section 2 to the West quarter corner thereof;
Thence North 00°15'45" East, 332.46 feet, along the West line of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 2;
Thence leaving said West line, North 89°59'19" East, 1321.50 feet;
Thence South 00°20'29" West, 333.43 feet to the East-West Mid-Section line of
said Section 2;
Thence along said East-West Mid-Section line, South 89°58'10" East, 1321.02 to
the center of said Section 2;
Thence continuing along said East-West Mid-Section line, South 89°58'10" East,
2227.84 feet;
Thence leaving said East-West Mid-Section Line, South 27°34'34" West, 1215.06
feet;
Thence South 62°24'20" East, 892.49 feet to the centerline of Cave Creek Road;
Thence along said centerline, South 27°32'28" West, 1349.60 feet to the South
line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 2, being the Northeast corner of Desert
Peak Unit 4, as recorded in Book 856 of Plats, Page 34, Records of Maricopa
County, Arizona;
Thence along said North line, North 89°45'55" West, 984.72 feet to the Northwest
corner of said Desert Peak Unit 4;
Thence along the West line of said Desert Peak Unit 4, South 56°53'47" West,
2315.89 feet, to the Southwest corner of said Desert Peak Unit 4 and the Northwest
Page 646
corner of Desert Peak Unit 3, as recorded in Book 849 of Plats, Page 12,
Records of Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence along the West line of said Desert Peak Unit 3 and the West line of
Desert Peak Unit 2, as recorded in Book 836 of Plats, Page 39, Records of
Maricopa County, Arizona, South 56°53'50" West, 1416.19 feet to the North right
of way line of Desert Peak Parkway;
Thence along said North right of way line, North 13°38'22" West, 17.64 feet to
the beginning of a tangent curve, concave Southwest, having a radius of 1483.00
feet;
Thence Northwesterly along said curve, through a central angle of 30°16'46", an
arc length of 783.73 feet to a non-tangent line, being the West line of the
Northwest quarter of said Section 11;
Thence along said West line, North 00°08'39" East, 1356.49 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
R-2 PORTION
A portion of land being situated within Sections 1 and 2, Township 4 North, Range 3
East of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more
particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at a found Brass Cap flush with sectional markings accepted as the
Southwest corner of said Section 2, from which a found pk nail with tag RLS 24513,
accepted as the West Quarter corner of Section 11, Township 4 North, Range 3 East,
bears South 00°08’39” West, 2633.00 feet;
Thence North 00°13’20” East, 2232.60 feet along the West line of the Southwest quarter
of said Section 2;
Thence leaving said West line, South 89°46’40” East, 4634.46 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Thence South 62°24'00" East, 890.05 feet;
Thence South 27°12'51" West, 351.89 feet;
Thence South 27°32'28" West, 350.75 feet;
Thence North 62°24'20" West, 892.49 feet;
Thence North 27°34'34" East, 702.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Page 647
R-3A PORTION
A portion of land being situated within Sections 1 and 2, Township 4 North, Range 3
East of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more
particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at a found Brass Cap flush with sectional markings accepted as the
Southwest corner of said Section 2, from which a found pk nail with tag RLS 24513,
accepted as the West Quarter corner of Section 11, Township 4 North, Range 3 East,
bears South 00°08’39” West, 2633.00 feet;
Thence North 00°13’20” East, 2232.60 feet along the West line of the Southwest quarter
of said Section 2;
Thence leaving said west line, South 89°46’40” East, 4634.46 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Thence North 27°34'34" East, 512.34 feet to the east-west mid-section of said Section
2;
Thence along said mid-section line, South 89°58'10" East, 414.04 feet to the East
quarter corner of said Section 2;
Thence South 89°05'03" East, 578.35 feet along the East-West mid-section line of said
Section 1;
Thence leaving said mid-section line, South 27°12'51" West, 963.71 feet; Thence North
62°24'00" West, 890.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Page 648
Page 649
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Desert View Village Planning Committee May 3, 2022
Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 2, 2022
Request From: S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District)
(417.33 acres)
Request To: R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District)
(388.10 acres), R-2 (Multifamily Residence
District) (14.19 acres), and R-3A
(Multifamily Residence District) (15.04
acres)
Proposed Use: Single-family and multifamily residential
Location: Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the
southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and
Jomax Road
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Applicant: DR Horton, Inc.
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
Current
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Preserves/2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre
General Plan Land Use Map Designation Future Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit
per acre
Proposed (GPA-1-DSTV-22-2) for 29.48
acres
Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Page 650
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
General Plan Conformity
Width varies from 33-
Cave Creek Major Arterial
foot to 73.15-foot west
Road (Scenic Drive)
Street Map Classification half street
Desert Peak
Major Arterial 70-foot east half street
Parkway
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
CERTAINTY & CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLES: Promote neighborhood identity
through planning that reinforces the existing landscaping and character of the area.
Each new development should contribute to the character identified for the village;
Integrate into the development design natural features such as washes, canals,
significant topography and existing vegetation, which are important in providing
character to new subdivisions.
As stipulated, the proposed development will reinforce the character of the area by
dedicating land to the City for the Sonoran Preserve, providing a public trail network with
access points to the desert park/mountain preserve area, and by maintaining the existing
wash and hillside areas within the subdivision as natural features. These design elements
enhance the desert character of the Village and incorporate natural features that promote
the identity of the Village.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The requested R1-10, R-2, and R-3A zoning districts would allow development of a new
residential community that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and respectful of
local conditions. The overall proposed density of the site is similar to densities in the
surrounding neighborhood and as stipulated, the proposal incorporates large setbacks,
landscaping, and density limits that prevent the development from having a negative
impact on the surrounding area.
Page 651
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
General Plan Conformity
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development
and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposal will be required to provide shade along the adjacent public sidewalks and
trails, in addition to the internal pedestrian pathways. This will help to provide shade for
pedestrians and bicyclists in and around the community and to mitigate the urban heat
island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus cooling the micro-climate around the vicinity.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
North Land Use Plan: See Background Item No. 7.
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 8.
Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 9.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 10.
Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 11.
Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 12.
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant S-1
North Vacant and recreation area S-1
South Single-family residential S-1 (Approved R1-8), R1-8
East (across Cave Creek
Vacant S-1 (Approved R1-6, C-2)
Road)
West (including across Single-family residential and
R1-18, R1-6, PUD
Desert Peak Parkway) vacant
Page 652
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
R1-10 – Single-Family Residence District
(Planned Residential Development Option)
Provisions on the
Standards R1-10 Requirements
proposed site plan
Gross Acreage - 388.10 acres
Total Maximum Number of 1,358 units, up to 1,746 with 1,145 units (Met)
Units bonus
Maximum Density 3.5 dwelling units per acre, up 2.95 dwelling units per acre
to 4.5 with bonus (Met)
Minimum Lot Width 45 feet 45 feet (Met)
Minimum Lot Depth None, except 110 feet 100 to 130 feet (Met)
adjacent to freeway or arterial
Maximum Building Height 2 stories and 30 feet 2 stories and less than 29
feet (Met)
Maximum Lot Coverage 40 percent, up to 50 percent Not specified
including attached shade
structures
Minimum Parking 2 spaces per dwelling unit Not specified
2,290 spaces required
MINIMUM PERIMETER BUILDING SETBACKS
Perimeter Streets 15 feet (in addition to Not specified
landscape setback)
Perimeter Property Lines Rear: 15 feet (1-story), Not specified
(Side and Rear) 20 feet (2-story)
Side: 10 feet (1-story), 15 feet
(2-story)
MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS AND STANDARDS
Common landscaped 15 feet average, 10 feet Cave Creek Road: 140 feet
setback adjacent to minimum (Met)
perimeter streets
Desert Peak Parkway: 15
feet (Met)
Minimum Common Area 5 percent of gross site area 15.76 percent (Met)
Page 653
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
R-2 - Multifamily Residence District
(Planned Residential Development Option)
Provisions on the
Standards Requirements
Proposed site Plan
Gross Acreage - 14.19 acres
Total Maximum Number of 149 units, up to 170 with 140 units
Units bonus
Maximum Density 10.5 dwelling units per 9.87 dwelling units per
acre, up to 12 with bonus acre (Met)
Maximum Lot Coverage 45 percent Not specified
Building Height/Stories 2 stories and 30 feet for 2 stories and less than
first 150 feet; 1 foot 28 feet (Met)
increase in height for 5
feet of additional building
setback, up to 48 feet
and 4 stories
Minimum Perimeter Setbacks
Adjacent to public street 20 feet Not specified
Adjacent to property line 10 feet Not specified
Minimum Interior Building Setbacks
Front 10 feet Not specified
Minimum Perimeter Landscape Setbacks
Adjacent to public street 20 feet Not specified
Adjacent to property line 5 feet Not specified
Minimum Open space 5 percent Not specified
Minimum parking 1.3 spaces per efficiency Not specified
unit; 1.5 spaces per 1 or
2 bedroom unit; 2 spaces
per 3 or more bedroom
unit; 1.0 spaces per unit
of less than 600 square
feet
Page 654
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
R-3A - Multifamily Residence District
(Planned Residential Development Option)
Provisions on the
Standards Requirements
Proposed site Plan
Gross Acreage - 15.04 acres
Total Maximum Number of 347 units, up to 397 with 260 units
Units bonus
Maximum Density 23.1 dwelling units per 17.29 dwelling units per
acre, up to 26.4 with acre (Met)
bonus
Maximum Lot Coverage 45 percent Not specified
Maximum Building Height 3 stories and 40 feet for 3 stories and 33 feet
150 feet; 1 foot increase (Met)
in height for 5 feet of
additional building
setback, up to 48 feet
and 4 stories
Minimum Perimeter Setbacks
Adjacent to public street 20 feet Not specified
Adjacent to property line 15 feet Not specified
Minimum Interior Building Setbacks
Front 10 feet Not specified
Minimum Perimeter Landscape Setbacks
Adjacent to public street 20 feet Not specified
Adjacent to property line 5 feet Not specified
Minimum Open space 5 percent Not specified
Minimum Parking 1.3 spaces per efficiency Not specified
unit; 1.5 spaces per 1 or
2 bedroom unit; 2 spaces
per 3 or more bedroom
unit; 1.0 spaces per unit
of less than 600 square
feet
Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 417.33 acres located approximately 2,400 feet southwest
of the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road from S-1 (Ranch or
Page 655
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Farm Residence District) to R-10 (Single-Family Residence District), R-2
(Multifamily Residence District), and R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) for a
detached single-family residential and two multifamily residential communities. The
site is undeveloped vacant land, owned by the Arizona State Land Department,
which was recently auctioned. Ownership is in transition to the applicant, DR Horton
Inc.
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
2. The majority of the subject site is
designated as Residential 2 to 5 dwelling
units per acre on the General Plan Land
Use Map. Additionally, the northwest
portion of the site is designated as Future
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per
acre, and Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre. Finally, the
northern portion of the site contains a
narrow portion of land designated as
Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned.
General Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning
and Development Department
The applicant is proposing a minor General Plan Amendment (GPA-DSTV-1-22-2),
which would change portions of the northeast corner of the subject site from
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
to Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre and Residential 15+ dwelling units per
acre. These designations would be coterminous with the proposed R-2 and R-3A
zoning districts, respectively. The proposed zoning districts are consistent with the
proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation.
PROPOSAL
3. Site Plan
The applicant proposes to develop a new residential community, which would
include a 1,145-lot detached single-family residential community. The development
also proposes two multifamily portions, described as Casitas and Garden on the
conceptual site plan, with a total of 400 multifamily units. The overall density would
be approximately 3.7 dwelling units per acre. The conceptual site plan depicts a
range of lot sizes within the single-family residential portion, from 4,500 square feet
to 8,450 square feet.
Page 656
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Conceptual Site Plan, Source: ABLA Studio
Staff does not recommend general conformance to the site plan, as this is a large
development, and the specific layout of lots and streets could change during the
subdivision and site plan review process. Staff is recommending several stipulations
that require certain aspects of the site plan to be maintained, as described below.
The conceptual site plan includes a 74.82-acre hillside area in the northwest portion
of the site, which is intended to be conveyed to the City of Phoenix Parks and
Recreation Department for development of a future park or mountain preserve. This
conveyance is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of Future
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre for the northwest hillside area. The
developer also intends to provide public access to the preserve area through two
access points within the subdivision, including a trail network and the possibility of a
Page 657
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
public parking area to ensure the public has access to the preserve. These aspects
of the plan are incorporated in Stipulation Nos. 1 and 2.
Staff recommends the following site plan elements to be incorporated:
• A minimum 140-foot landscape setback along Cave Creek Road, consistent
with the designation as a scenic corridor (Stipulation No. 3);
• Enhanced landscaping with 70 percent two-inch and 30 percent three-inch
caliper trees, planted 20 feet on center and five, five-gallon shrubs per tree
within landscape setbacks along Cave Creek Road, Desert Peak Parkway
and the perimeter setbacks of the R-2 and R-3A zoned areas (Stipulation No.
4);
• Minimum 15 percent open space (after the dedication of the hillside area)
provided within the R1-10 zoned area (Stipulation No. 25);
• Minimum 10 percent open space provided within each of the R-2 and R-3A
zoned areas (Stipulation Nos. 28 and 32);
• A minimum of two active and three passive open space areas provided within
the R1-10 zoned area (Stipulation No. 26);
• A minimum of five amenities provided within the open space areas for the R-
2 and R-3A zoned areas (Stipulation Nos. 29 and 33).
4. Overall Trails Exhibit
The applicant has submitted an Overall Trails Exhibit, which depicts the location of a
proposed trail network within and surrounding the site. It includes multi-use trails
along the entire frontages of Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway and a
combination of multi-use trails, community trails, and detached sidewalks through
the site connecting the two frontages along three separate paths. The development
does not intend to be closed to pedestrians. Public access easements will be
required to meet the public access requirement for the access points to the
preserve. It is expected that the internal multi-use trails will contain easements
sufficient to fulfill this requirement, but the plan for access will be finalized at a later
date in consultation with the Parks and Recreation Department, per Stipulation No.
2.
Page 658
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Overall Trails Exhibit, Source: ABLA Studio
Staff recommends the following elements of the Overall Trails Exhibit to be
incorporated into the development:
• A 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) and 30-foot-wide multi-use trail
easement (MUTE) shall be provided along both perimeter frontages
(Stipulation No. 6);
• Ten-foot-wide community trails and multi-use trails shall be provided within
the development, where indicated on the plan (Stipulation No. 7);
• A detached sidewalk shall be provided along the primary roadway through
the development, as indicated on the plan, including two-inch caliper shade
trees planted 25 feet on center planted between the sidewalk and the back of
the curb (Stipulation No. 10).
Page 659
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
5. Single-Family Elevations
The conceptual building elevations for the single-family homes depict one- and two-
story homes with a variety of architectural styles and variation in colors, textures,
and facades. Staff recommends enhancing the four-sided architectural component
by requiring architectural detailing to the windows on all sides of the buildings
(Stipulation No. 24).
Conceptual Single-Family Building Elevations, Source: DR Horton
Page 660
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Conceptual Single-Family Building Elevations, Source: DR Horton
6. Multifamily Elevations
Staff recommends general conformance to the multifamily building elevations within
both the R-2 zoned areas, labeled “Casitas” on the site plan and elevations, and the
R-3A zoned areas, labeled “Garden” on the site plan and “Tuck-Under Multifamily”
and “Carriage Multifamily” on the elevations. The elevations depict multifamily
buildings with a variety of architectural styles and variation in colors, textures, and
facades, as well as four-sided architecture. The Casitas building elevations depict
one- and two-story buildings with a maximum height of less than 28 feet. The
Garden building elevations depict two- and three-story buildings with a maximum
height of 33 feet. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 27 and 31.
Page 661
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Conceptual Building Elevations (Casitas), Source: DHI Communities
Page 662
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Conceptual Building Elevations (Garden), Source: DHI Communities
Page 663
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
STUDIES AND POLICIES
7. North Land Use Plan
In 1996, the Phoenix City Council adopted the North Land Use Plan, which
established recommendations for land use and future development for the area
generally bounded by Cave Creek Wash to the west, Scottsdale Road to the east,
Carefree Highway to the north, and Pinnacle Peak Road to the south. The plan
shifted residential density designations from the previous General Plan Land Use
Map with the goals of protecting the desert character, recognizing washes as a
development constraint, and maximizing infrastructure efficiency. The subject site is
designated as Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre in the plan. Figure 22 in the
plan also denotes the site as an area containing extra infrastructure capacity, noting
that density should be move toward areas of extra capacity to increase
infrastructure efficiency.
The proposed development includes a range of densities and a large area to be set-
aside for a desert preserve or mountain park. The overall site is proposed at a
density of 3.7 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the designation in the
North Land Use Plan. The site plan shifts density away from the hillside preserve
area to the west and closer to the major arterial of Cave Creek Road. While this
creates areas within the development that exceeds 5 dwelling units per acre, the
overall average density is consistent with the recommendations in the North Land
Use Plan, in addition to the preservation of sensitive areas to the west and
incorporation of washes as preserved resources within the community.
Page 664
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
8. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached from
the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide
thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. Staff is
recommending the following stipulations designed to provide trees and enhance
shade within the development.
• Seventy percent two-inch caliper and 30 percent three-inch caliper trees
within the required landscape setbacks (Stipulation No. 4);
• Shaded pedestrian paths, multi-use trails, and sidewalks to provide a
minimum of 75 percent shade (Stipulation No. 5);
• The sidewalks along Cave Creek Road and the internal primary roadway
through the development shall be detached with landscaped areas between
the sidewalk and the back of the curb (Stipulation Nos. 9 and 10).
9. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To promote safety and connectivity for
pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users, staff is recommending detached sidewalks
along Cave Creek Road and the internal primary roadway, multi-use trails and
pedestrian paths on the perimeter streets and within the development, construction
and dedication of a new bus stop pad on Cave Creek Road, and bicycle parking in
the multifamily portions of the development. These are addressed in Stipulation
Nos. 6 through 10, 30, and 34.
10. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of destinations.
As stipulated, the project will provide bicycle parking spaces within the multifamily
portions of the development, installed per the requirements of the Walkable Urban
(WU) Code. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 30 and 34.
11. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. The City of Phoenix offers
Page 665
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
recycling services for single-family residential properties.
12. Housing Phoenix
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid
population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000
new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a
primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development
supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by
contributing to a variety housing types that will address the supply shortage at a
more rapid pace while using vacant land in a more sustainable fashion.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
13. As of the writing of this report, staff received eight letters in opposition to this
request. The letters cited issues with the proposed density and character of the
area, increased traffic, impacts to wildlife, and a lack of nearby retail and open
space.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
14. The Parks and Recreation Department requires the dedication of a multi-use trail
easement and construction of a multi-use trail along Cave Creek Road and Desert
Peak Parkway adjacent to this development. These comments are addressed in
Stipulation No. 6.
15. The Street Transportation Department commented that the developer shall provide
detached sidewalks along Cave Creek Road, construct a 24-foot landscaped
median island along Desert Peak Parkway, align the primary roadway through the
subdivision with the intersection of Desert Peak Parkway and Hillstone Way, and
connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane, 27th Place, and 29th
Way. Other comments provided pertained to adjacent right-of-way dedication and
street construction, traffic impact study requirement, and other general street
improvement requirements. These comments are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 9
and 11 through 16.
16. The Public Transit Department commented that the developer shall dedicate right-
of-way and construct one bus stop pad along southbound Cave Creek Road,
meeting the requirements of the City of Phoenix. This comment is addressed in
Stipulation No. 8.
Page 666
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
17. The Water Services Departments commented that a water and sewer main
extension will be required and a water and sewer master plan will need to be
submitted during the development review process. However, no stipulations are
required for the rezoning case. Furthermore, capacity is a dynamic condition that
can change over time due to a variety of factors. The City intends to provide water
and sewer service, requirements and assurances for which are determined during
the site plan review process. For any given property, water and sewer requirements
may vary over time to be less or more restrictive depending on the status of the
City’s water and sewer infrastructure.
18. The Aviation Department requires that the property owner record a Notice to
Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport in order to disclose the existence,
and operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. Furthermore, that an avigation easement is dedicated to the City of
Phoenix as this property is within the Deer Valley Airport traffic pattern airspace and
seeking noise sensitive land uses. Lastly, that a No Hazard Determination for the
proposed development be provided from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460
obstruction analysis review process. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 17
through 19.
19. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. If
further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site and
immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous archaeological
projects have been conducted within this project area, it is recommended that
archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted. Phase II
archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based upon the results
of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this determination in consultation
with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event archaeological materials are
encountered during construction, all ground disturbing activities must cease within a
33-foot radius of the discovery and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be
notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 20 through 22.
20. The Floodplain Management division of the Public Works Department did not have
any comments on this case.
21. The Fire Department commented that there were no anticipated problems with the
referenced case and that the water supply will be required to meet fire flow
standards in the fire code.
OTHER
22. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in
Page 667
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by
the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require
the form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 23.
23. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements such as obtaining a
use permit to conduct the proposed outdoor use in this zoning district. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be
required.
Findings
1. The requested R1-10, R-2, and R-3A zoning districts produce an overall density and
development pattern that is consistent with the character of the surrounding area.
2. As stipulated, the proposed development appropriately shifts density away from
sensitive natural resources and closer to the major arterial of Cave Creek Road and
provides design elements that protect the surrounding natural and built environment.
3. As stipulated, the proposed development enhances connectivity in the immediate
vicinity, including multi-modal transportation options with shade elements, and
improves public access to the adjacent natural resources.
Stipulations
OVERALL SITE
1. Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan approval, the landowner shall convey
approximately 74 acres (or an area mutually agreed upon by the city and the
owner) of hillside land selected by the City of Phoenix and located in the area
depicted as “Hillside Area” on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022, to
the City of Phoenix for the use as a City of Phoenix desert park and/or mountain
preserve, as modified and approved by the Planning and Development
Department and the Parks and Recreation Department.
2. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department to determine a maximum of two access points to the desert park or
mountain preserve area prior to issuance of preliminary site plan approval. The
access points shall be made accessible to the public through a trail network,
within and/or bounding the site, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department. In conjunction with the electric utility provider, the
Page 668
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
developer shall also explore the possibility of providing a public access parking
lot in the utility easement area with access to the preserve trail network.
3. A minimum landscaped setback of 140 feet shall be provided along the Cave
Creek Road frontage.
4. The required landscape setbacks along Cave Creek Road, Desert Peak
Parkway, and the perimeter setbacks for the R-2 and R-3A zoned portions of the
site where adjacent to single-family residential zoning shall be planted with a
minimum of 70 percent 2-inch caliper and 30 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy
drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-
gallon shrubs per tree, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.
5. Within the development and along Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway,
all pedestrian paths, multi-use trails, and sidewalks, excluding sidewalks along
internal streets, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at maturity, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75 percent shade, as approved
or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
6. The developer shall dedicate 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easements (MUTE)
along the east side of Desert Peak Parkway and the west side of Cave Creek
Road and construct a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the
easements in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist,
the developer shall work with the Site Planning Section on an alternative design
through the technical appeal process.
7. The developer shall construct minimum 10-foot-wide community trails and multi-
use trails, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails Exhibit, date stamped April
15, 2022, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with
the Site Planning Section on an alternative design through the technical appeal
process.
8. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad along
southbound Cave Creek Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according
to the City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet
and be located from the intersection of the main access point on Cave Creek
Road according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department or the Public Transit
Department.
Page 669
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
9. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a
minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area between the back of curb and sidewalk
along Cave Creek Road, planted to the following standards and as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department or Street Transportation
Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at
maturity.
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. The developer shall construct minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks with
minimum 5-foot-wide landscape areas between the back of curb and sidewalks
along the primary roadway through the subdivision, as generally depicted on the
Overall Trails Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022, planted with minimum 2-inch
caliper shade trees, 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts
arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department
on an alternative design solution consistent with a pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate 65 feet of right-of-way along Cave Creek Road, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. The developer shall construct a 24-foot-wide landscaped median island along
Desert Peak Parkway from Hillstone Way to 23rd Street, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The developer shall align the primary roadway through the subdivision with the
intersection of Desert Peak Parkway and Hillstone Way and shall be responsible
for any modifications to the existing drainage facility and access ramp, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
14. The developer shall connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane,
27th Place, and 29th Way, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February
4, 2022 and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.
Page 670
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
15. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a Cave Creek Road
Traffic Corridor Analysis from Sonoran Desert Drive south to the 101 Freeway to
evaluate the overall level of service and corridor conditions with impacts
associated with the proposed 1,545 dwelling units. The developer shall be
responsible for regional mitigation identified through the analysis. No preliminary
approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and approved by
the Street Transportation Department.
16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
17. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the
templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by
the City Attorney.
20. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
21. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I
data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
22. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
Page 671
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
23. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.
R1-10 ZONED AREA
24. Building elevations shall depict architectural detailing applied to windows on all
sides of the homes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
25. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area for the R1-10 zoned portion of
the site, after dedication of the hillside area to the city, shall be retained as open
space, including washes and internal hillside areas, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. This requirement shall not be applied to individual
phases of the overall development.
26. A minimum of two distinct active open space areas and a minimum of three
passive open space areas shall be provided within the overall R1-10 zoned area,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
R-2 ZONED AREA
27. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
28. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
29. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as
but not limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground equipment,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
30. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City
of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks
shall be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located
near the clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
Page 672
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
R-3A ZONED AREA
31. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
32. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
33. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as
but not limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground equipment,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
34. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City
of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks
shall be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located
near the clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
Writer
Anthony Grande
April 29, 2022
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped February 4, 2022 (1 page)
Conceptual Overall Trails Exhibit date stamped April 15, 2022 (1 page)
Conceptual Building Elevations and renderings date stamped February 4, 2022 (35
pages; note: not all elevations submitted are included herein but are available to view as
part of the rezoning case file)
Community Correspondence (8 pages)
Page 673
Desert Maintenance
Character B
S-1
Overlay District
JOMAX RD
PUD *
ANX 254
Z-43-02 R1-6 *
Z-61-06
Z-46-19
HAPPY VALLEY ROAD ALIGNMENT
W LN
LO
OL
IE TH
FALLEN QU C-2 *
R1-18*
L
LE
AF TR
G
RIN
LN SP Z-61-06
DY
ANX 254 R1-8 PRD * S HA
DESERT PEAK PKWY
Z-43-02 Z-8-04
R1-8 *
CREEK RD GU
ARO PARK
RID
GE SA
LN Z-61-06
R1-6 *
Y 29
TH
A
W
AY R1-6 *
R1-8 PRD*
ST
S-1
NE W
TH
ANX 254 HI L LS
TO 24 RK Z-61-06
PA RD
PL
Z-43-0223 Z-8-04
K
EW
TH
L VI CR
TP
L
PL RP EE
21S LE IB E
ER N
LIE B
L
D
ST ST CA
R1-8
ST
AR
T D RD TH VE
TS ME 25 27
ALA
21S
TH
PRD* 28
TH
R1-8* ANX 254 RO
22ND WAY
BB ST
R1-6 ANX 254 Z-43-02 PL LN M
IN
E C-2 *
Z-65-97 Z-43-02 Z-8-04 25T
H CR
E
Z-14-04 R-2 PRD* EK
RD Z-61-06
ANX 187 MISTY WILLOW LN Z-8-04
R1-8 *
I
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD
Z-6-22 LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
JOMAX RD
0.2 0.1 0 0.2
HAPPY VALLEY RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101BLVD
MAYO
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
DR Horton, Inc.
FROM:
S-1 ( 417.33 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
4/14/2022
Z-6-22 REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
R1-10 ( 388.10 a.c.)
R-3A ( 15.04 a.c.)
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
417.33 Acres QS 46-33, 46-34, 47-33,
O-10, O-9, P-9 TO: R-2 ( 14.19 a.c.)
47-34, 48-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 417 N/A
R1-10, R-3A, R-2 1358, 331, 142 1746, 397, 170
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-6-22.mxd
Page 674
Desert Maintenance
Character B
S-1
Overlay District
JOMAX RD
PUD *
ANX 254
Z-43-02 R1-6 *
Z-61-06
Z-46-19
HAPPY VALLEY ROAD ALIGNMENT
W LN
LO
OL
IE TH
FALLEN QU C-2 *
R1-18*
L
LE
AF TR
G
RIN
LN SP Z-61-06
DY
ANX 254 R1-8 PRD * S HA
DESERT PEAK PKWY
Z-43-02 Z-8-04
R1-8 *
CREEK RD GU
ARO PARK
RID
GE SA
LN Z-61-06
R1-6 *
Y 29
TH
A
W
AY R1-6 *
R1-8 PRD*
ST
S-1
NE W
TH
ANX 254 HI L LS
TO 24 RK Z-61-06
PA RD
PL
Z-43-0223 Z-8-04
K
EW
TH
L VI CR
TP
L
PL RP EE
21S LE IB E
ER N
LIE B
L
D
ST ST CA
R1-8
ST
AR
T D RD TH VE
TS ME 25 27
ALA
21S
TH
PRD* 28
TH
R1-8* ANX 254 RO
22ND WAY
BB ST
R1-6 ANX 254 Z-43-02 PL LN M
IN
E C-2 *
Z-65-97 Z-43-02 Z-8-04 25T
H CR
E
Z-14-04 R-2 PRD* EK
RD Z-61-06
ANX 187 MISTY WILLOW LN Z-8-04
R1-8 *
I
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD
Z-6-22 LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
JOMAX RD
0.2 0.1 0 0.2
HAPPY VALLEY RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101BLVD
MAYO
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
DR Horton, Inc.
FROM:
S-1 ( 417.33 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
4/14/2022
Z-6-22 REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
R1-10 ( 388.10 a.c.)
R-3A ( 15.04 a.c.)
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
417.33 Acres QS 46-33, 46-34, 47-33,
O-10, O-9, P-9 TO: R-2 ( 14.19 a.c.)
47-34, 48-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 417 N/A
R1-10, R-3A, R-2 1358, 331, 142 1746, 397, 170
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-6-22.mxd
Page 675
#H , . 9;
#'; )'1; # - ) -*0;- ; ; ;3 ;8;
) 1;- ; ; ;
5. ;- ; ;
#'; )'1; # - )
%%.! ;- ; ;;
2-).' 0 *); . ( )1; ;
8 - ;((;);# )# ;)#
. )!;*-- *-; ; ;
0() ;$' ;
*, );., ;- ; ;; ;
'((;# 1;);# )# 1*1%;*, );., ; ;;
)#;0() ;$' 3)"1; *3)1!1"7; ' 6;
- ); 3 ;
. 1.; ;4;
; ;'1;';#';$' ;
: ;%*1; 3; ;
9; :;$'#$#(;/ ; : ;%*2; 4;
:;%*2; 3 ;
0() ;/ ; :;%*2; 3; ;
: ;%*2; 3; ;
, . ;;,- %;2*1%; ;3;
, . ;;
-*0;- ; ;
) 1;- ; ;;
!H 5. ;- ; ;
H3H?7=H@/9/2=H>/?8D/FH . )!;*-- *-; ;; ;
*, );., ;- ; ; ;
A3;>3H/?7G=, )* # H > 3) 1; *3)1!1$7; ' 6;
-$# # H 1= : ;%*2; ;4;
)HH
:;%*2; 3; ;
:;%*2; 4 ;
, . ;;,- %;1*2%; ; 3 ;
(H =?A=<
H<HA6H/C3 -*..;- ; ;; ;3 8;
>6=3<7EH /?7G=) 1;- ; /+
, )* # H -$# # H 5. ;- ; ;
"%%.! ;- ; ;
)HH
1= 1*1%;*, );., ; ;;
3) 1; *3)1 1 7; ' 6;
: ;%*2; ;4; ;
/22?3@@H 9=1/A32H<=?A6H/<2H@=BA6H :;%*2; ;4;
:;%*2; ;4; ;
=4HA63H 6/>>FHC/993FH : ;%*1; 4 ;
/975<;31/C3H1?338H?=/2H7Page 676
1*1%;
>6=3<7EH /?7G= -*0;- ; ;; ;3 8;
/>>971/1=
3E7@A7<5HG=<7<5H H %%.# ;- ; ;;
2-).' 0 *); . ( )1; ; ;
>?=>=@32HG=<7<5H (:H&(%H( H&(%H
( H &(% *, );., ;- ; ;
;$+; (/; ;!; ;"; (/; ;%,; 5?=@@H/1?3/53H H/1H 1*1%;*, );., ; ;; ;
3) 1; *3)1!1$7; ' 6;
4; ;
;)&);
.!1.; ;3;
: ;%*1; ;4;
: ;%*1; ;4; ;
:;%*1; ;4;
% / :;%*1; ;4; ;
;4;
'!'/ '"'/ ,- &;1*2%; ;3;
,/&(# /$/
, )* # H .$# # H
'H H ;$+; (.; ;!; ;!; (/; ;$+;
#/+ -/$/
;*'*;
, )* # H , )+ # H
.$# # H
-$# # H % /
./ / / /
$526;(3254; ; 274 ;
%)* /
Page 677
Page 678
EË MË MË BË QË CË
AË D ?>Ë SË EË
DP $
¯
3-Ë TT°Ë
DD"Ë |ÇË
!
±
-6Ë aË W[Vs
² D§ FË
{Ë @R"E>¸Ë
Ë `Ë k~XË
³ @> EË
Dª¡Ë ctË
?S SË
./Ë uT½Ë
>P PË H;PË
Ë bË k~¹Ë
³ >= PË Ê;PË
@¤¡Ë cu´Ë
Ë S"?o·Ë
.<-Ë uT½Ë
N =
eTTf^Ë
bk~lgË ctË
BË BË BË
>IË AFË
DP =Ë DP =Ë
12Ë TT°Ë
ËDD Ë |µqË º ! DD =Ë }µ£
9.Ë aË WZ¶Ë .<3Ë `Ë Y\»
! D="FË O· D¨"EË
.0Ë tT[Ë 64Ë wT]Ë
AS EË>¸ AS FË
Ë `Ë k~¹ Ë aË lY¹Ë
¾ A?"FË
A>"E>¸ D©¢Ë `w<¿#
?R À Ë>S À
:6Ë tT^Ë 66Ë wT_«Ë
¼Ë
>P "PË J· ?P"PË K·
Ë `Ë k~ Ë aË lX¹Ë
>= "PË J· Á ?=®"¬Ë ·Ë
A¥¢Ë bw«Ë
S ?Ë >;PË S >Ë ?;PË
52Ë vT½ 65Ë wT½
PË P$Ã
Page 679 Ë aË l Ë aË lXÄ%
$Ã
`k~lhË at alkiË `w¿Ë
DP$ÃË
&'''''
,'ÅÆ- <Æ6ÅTT°Ë
( +( DD"=Ë }Ç
p "
47Ë `Ë X]UrË
) ** D= GË NË;PË
m
66Ë wT½Ë
nË
yzË @S "FË ?¸Ë
Ë cË lXË
@? FË;@Ë
Dª¢Ë bwÈË
>S É
88 xT½
?P PË L;PË
Ë cË lY¹Ë
?= PË Ê;PË
@¦¢Ë dxÈË
S"> ?·
6.Ë wT½
P =Ë
Ë cË lY¹Ë
= =Ë
clkjË bwÈË
Page 680
-1hqi6kj .2
c X! [A]A[| c!X" \A^A[|
*78 *79
c ( ZRBz d X ZSBz
8 7 4x 8 7 4x
.pm IOUPaL IRXy .om IPUOaM JSXy
7*+'7 7 *+'7
f X YRBz e X YSBz
r)6kj
;<@ GC ITXX^{
,0
Page 681
/3} /3 )
f$X [B_B[Dfg f$X% [B_BY|
*7~ +7~
c#( \TBz c#( \TBz
s
:7 5x
: 7 5x
/pm IOUPbL ITX /pm JOVPbL ITX
uw *+x 7 *+x
c X ZRBcE c&X ZRBdF
t
) )
=>?l vaNHC KRXX`{
KQWn
Page 682
Page 683
9
*9 ,$
.*9 +%1 9 .*9 +%0 9
" 5
( 9 !%**-
.*9 +&.
.*9 +&0
9
*9 ,$
Page 684
.*9 +%2 9 .*9 +%0 9
( 9 !'**- ( 9 !%**-
$
/*9 +&/ 96
4
7
8) *39 # 9
$ ! " $ #
Page 685
Concrete Roof Tile
Decorative Wraught Iron Detail
Decorative Gable Pipes Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E Garage Door -
Windows See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
4 TYP
Perspective
25’-4 3/4”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 686
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4091 B
Stucco System
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
6 TYP
Perspective
26’-4 1/8”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 687
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4091 F
Stucco System
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
4 TYP
Perspective
25’-4 3/4”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 688
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4091 C
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Garage Door -
Windows
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Perspective
12 17’-0”
5 TYP
9’-1”
Page 689
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3534 A
Decorative Gable Concrete Roof Tile
Pipe Detail
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Accent Paint w/ Garage Door -
Special Stucco Finish See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
17’-0”
5 TYP
9’-1”
Page 690
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3534 B
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E Stucco System
Windows
Garage Door -
Standard Ledgestone Shown
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
12 17’-0”
5 TYP
12’- 10 1/8”
9’-1”
Page 691
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3534 C
Concrete Roof Tile
Board and Batton System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
Perspective
12 17’-0”
5 TYP
12’-1”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 692
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3534 F
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Standard Le dge s to ne Sho wn Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
17’-0”
5 TYP
10’-1”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 693
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3534 N
Concrete Roof Tile
Decorative Gable Pipes Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E Garage Door -
Windows See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Perspective
25’-6”
20’-7”
4 TYP
10’-1 1/8”
Page 694
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4093 B
Stucco System
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
27’-8”
6 TYP
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 695
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4093 F
Stucco System
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
Perspective
25’-6”
20’-7”
4 TYP
10’-1 1/8”
Page 696
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4093 C
27’-3 1/4”
Perspective
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 697
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Concrete Roof Tile
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Decorative Wooden Shutters
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish Stucco System
Standard Ledgestone Shown
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
5 TYP
28’-9 1/2” Perspective
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 698
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4097 F
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Decorative Wooden Shutters
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Garage Door -
Standard Ledgestone Shown See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
4 TYP Perspective
27’-3 1/4”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 699
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4097 C
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Decorative Gable Pipe Detail
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
4 TYP
Perspective
26’-0 1/2”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 700
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4095 B
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E Garage Door -
Windows See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
6 TYP
28’-3 3/4” Perspective
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 701
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4095 F
Concrete Roof Tile Stucco System
Accent Paint w/
Dual Pane Low-E Special Stucco Finish
Windows
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
4 TYP Perspective
25’-10 3/8”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 702
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4095 C
Concrete Roof Tile Decorati e Wrought Iron Detail
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Decorative Wooden Shutters Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Perspective
12 16’-11 3/4”
5 TYP
11’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 703
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3507 A
Concrete Roof Tile
Decorative Gable Pipe
Dual Pane Low-E Stucco System
Windows
Accent Paint w/ Garage Door -
Special Stucco Finish See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
12 16’-11 3/4”
5 TYP
11’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 704
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3507 B
Stucco System
Concrete Roof Tile
Dual Pane Low-E Accent Paint w/
Windows Special Stucco Finish
Garage Door -
Optional Ledgestone Available See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
12 16’-11 3/4”
5 TYP
11’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 705
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3507 C
Concrete Roof Tile
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Decorative Wooden
Shutters Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
Perspective
12 17’-0”
5 TYP
12’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 706
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3507 F
Concrete Roof Tile
Dual Pane Low-E Stucco System
Windows Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Garage Door -
Optional Ledgestone Available See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
12 15’-5 1/8”
4 TYP
11’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 707
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3507 N
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Garage Door -
Windows
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Perspective
5 TYP 16’-11 1/2”
13’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 708
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3524 A
Decorative Gable Pipe Detail
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Accent Paint w/ Garage Door -
Special Stucco Finish See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
16’-11 1/2”
5 TYP
13’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 709
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3524 B
Concrete Roof Tile
Decorative Wrought Iron Detail
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E Stucco System
Windows
Garage Door -
Standard Ledgestone Shown
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
16’-11 1/2”
5 TYP
13’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 710
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3524 C
Concrete Roof Tile
Board and Batton System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
Perspective
12 16’-11 1/2”
5 TYP
12’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 711
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3524 F
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E Accent Paint w/
Windows Special Stucco Finish
Standard Ledgestone Shown Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
12 15’-6”
5 TYP
12’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 712
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3524 N
From: Natalie Heylen
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Raining for stone butte east
Date: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:54:34 PM
What is the case number for this? I see lots of numbers everywhere.
Application number z-6-22
Dsd#21-5799
I want to make my feelings known I am not ok with this rezoning. What will happen to all the
hiking trails around here?
Page 713
From: Lauren Prole
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Stone Butte East - Concerns
Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 2:13:54 PM
Good afternoon Julianna,
I am a concerned resident of Desert Peak, just south of the proposed Stone Butte East project.
I wanted to reach out to you to find out how community concerns can be heard. We had a
neighborhood meeting with the developers of the project yesterday, but they did not provide
any specific responses to questions that were asked and many responses included pointed
towards the City of Phoenix.
One of my biggest issues is traffic, since the current infrastructure barely handles the traffic of
the residents that live here, adding 1,500 homes is concerning. Here are a couple examples:
-Cave Creek between Pinnacle and 51 freeway is congested almost all hours of the day.
-Excessive speed on Cave Creek as well as Desert Peak Parkway - I'm extremely concerned
for the children crossing Desert Peak Parkway with no clear pedestrian crosswalks.
-On Pinnacle/Desert Peak Parkway as traffic is heading west at the intersection of Cave Creek
Rd and Pinnacle there is already a huge problem with traffic backing up with no turn lane.
Are any of these issues going to be addressed with the planning of Stone Butte East? I
appreciate your time and look forward to your response.
Thank you,
Lauren Prole
Page 714
Anthony M Grande
From: Anthony M Grande
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 6:04 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: FW: Stone Butte East
From:M.J.Westfall
Sent:Tuesday,April5,20221:13PM
To:JuliannaPierre;PDDNorthGatewayVPC
Cc:ben@witheymorris.com
Subject:StoneButteEast
IamcontactingyoutorespectfullyrequestthatyoureconsidertherezoningrequestsforZͲ6Ͳ22Ͳ2,theproposedproject
ofStoneButteEast.
Outofconsiderationfortheexistingresidentsinthearea,Iamaskingthatyoupleaseconsidersignificantlyincreasing
theproposed40'landscapebufferbetweentheSheaneighborhood,NorthviewatStoneButte,andthewestsideof
phase1.Theresidentswhopurchasedhomesinthisare0qadidsofortheopenspaceandthesurroundingnatural
desert.Increasingthedistancebetweentheseresidentialcomplexeswillhelptomaintaintheopen,naturalfeelofthe
areaandhelptoprotecttheexistinghabitatsofthelocalwildlife.Ifeelthattheexistingplandoesnotproperly
accomodateforpreservingthenaturalaspectofthearea,theverythingthatmakesthislocationdesirabletoyour
futurepotentialbuyers.
Additionally,Iamrequestingthatyoupleasereconsidertherequestedzoningchangesforthemultifamilyresidential
units.TheareaisalreadygrosslyoverͲcongestedandcrammingmorepeopleintothisareaisirresponsibleconsidering
thatwedonothavetheroads,stores,etc.tosupportthegrowth.Furthermore,themultifamilyunitsbringan
undesirableelementthatwilllikelyimpacthomevalueswithboththenewbuildhomesandtheexistinghomes.
I'dbehappytodiscussfurtherandsincerlyhopethattheconcernsoftheexistingresidentswillbeconsidered.
BestRegards,
MelissaWestfall
619Ͳ518Ͳ5973
Page 715
Anthony M Grande
From: Niranjan Dravid
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2022 12:28 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Desert View Village Planning committee meeting - Stone butte East
HELLO Anthony,
We were told by some of our residents to contact you in order to get our objections for the public
meeting notice that is going to be help on May 3 (Village planning ) & June 2 (Planning rezoning) .
We want to strongly OBJECT to the proposal due to the below reasons
1. This will simply destroy the ecosystem of the animals living in this area & will put them in danger .
2. This proposal will put a direct impact on our home prices. The high density of homes is 6 times
more denser than the existing homes that are built in Stone butte.
3. The whole area will become a concrete jungle without any parks. There are no parks near Stone
butte at all, why can't the City consider to use and redevelop this land and built parks for the families
so that the kids and adults can enjoy walks, pickle ball, tennis, baseball . We strongly feel that
building so many homes is profitable for the builder and they will mint a lot of money, but what about
the general public who needs parks and recreations near this area ? Is anyone thinking about them ?
We also do not have grocery stores, Gym etc near by, use this land to develop that instead and not
allow using such a dense population of homes which will have a negative impacts on eco system,
prices & the existing families.
We OBJECT to this proposal and would appreciate if you can take our vote for objection,
Shea Homes resident
Page 716
Anthony M Grande
From: Smitha Kundur
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 2:49 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Reference to Stone Butte East, Case Nos Z-6--22 & GPS-DSTV-1-22
Attachments: Stone Butte.jpg
Hello Anthony,
I am a resident of the Desert Peak neighborhood located on the northwest corner of Pinnacle Peak Road and Cave Creek
Road.
I understand there is a zoning conversion hearing for Stone Butte East development as referenced above. We obtained
a proposed site plan (see attached) that shows 3 connections to the existing Desert Peak community. I am a resident
that lives adjacent to one of these connections and I am very concerned with the amount of traffic the new
development will add to our neighborhood. The way their site plan is laid out, most of the traffic from the houses
located along the southern property limits of Stone Butte will most likely access the existing Desert Peak community
adding a lot of traffic burden on our roadways.
I would also like to request any traffic study/circulation study the developer submitted as part of the zoning conversion
documents. I am a traffic engineer by profession and would like to see the amount of traffic the proposed community is
generating as a whole and how much of it will be accessing our neighborhood.
Thank you for your time. I can be reached at 479‐871‐4110 or via email if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Smitha.
Page 717
Anthony M Grande
From: Maruth Kumar Mulakala
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 11:25 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Ref Stone Butte East Case nos: Z-6-22 & GPA-DSTV-1-22
Hello Anthony,
I am a resident of the Desert Peak neighborhood located on the northwest corner of Pinnacle Peak Road and Cave Creek
Road.
I understand there is a zoning conversion hearing for Stone Butte East development as referenced above. We obtained
a proposed site plan (see attached) that shows 3 connections to the existing Desert Peak community. I am a resident
that lives adjacent to one of these connections and I am very concerned with the amount of traffic the new
development will add to our neighborhood. The way their site plan is laid out, most of the traffic from the houses
located along the southern property limits of Stone Butte will most likely access the existing Desert Peak community
adding a lot of traffic burden on our roadways.
Thank you for your time. I can be reached at 480 677 0026 or via email if you have any questions.
Please let me know if there is anything we can do to avoid such an intrusive plan.
Thanks
Maruth Mulakala
Page 718
Anthony M Grande
From: Anunori
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 12:51 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Stone Butte East - Cases No Z-6-22 & GPA-DSTV-1-22
Hello Anthony,
I am a resident of the Desert Peak neighborhood located on the northwest corner of Pinnacle Peak Road and Cave Creek
Road.
I understand there is a zoning conversion hearing for Stone Butte East development as referenced above. We obtained
a proposed site plan that shows 3 connections to the existing Desert Peak community. I am a resident that lives
adjacent to one of these connections and I am very concerned with the amount of traffic the new development will add
to our neighborhood. The way their site plan is laid out, most of the traffic from the houses located along the southern
property limits of Stone Butte will most likely access the existing Desert Peak community adding a lot of traffic burden
on our roadways.
This is a concern for us.
Thank you for your time and listening to us.
Regards,
Anuradha
Page 719
Anthony M Grande
From: Lalitha K
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 1:41 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Regarding zoning for Desert View village
Attachments: 2c7ca7fa-031c-4515-89b0-96e09fee80a4.jpg
Hello Anthony,
I am a resident of the Desert Peak neighborhood located on the northwest corner of Desert Peak Road and Cave Creek
Road.
I understand there is a zoning conversion hearing for Stone Butte East development as referenced above. We obtained
a proposed site plan (see attached) that shows 3 connections to the existing Desert Peak community. I am a resident
that lives adjacent to one of these connections and I am very concerned with the amount of traffic the new
development will add to our neighborhood. The way their site plan is laid out, most of the traffic from the houses
located along the southern property limits of Stone Butte will most southern property limits of Stone Butte will most
likely access the existing Desert Peak community adding a lot of traffic burden on our roadways.
We are already impacted by Stone Butt west and North View Shea construction and with hazardous traffic conditions.
Thank you for your time. I can be reached at 305 798 2625 or via email if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Lalitha
Page 720
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-6-22-2
Date of VPC Meeting May 3, 2022
Request From S-1
Request To R1-10, R-2, and R-3A
Proposed Use Single-family and multifamily residential
Location Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest
corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 6-3
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 and Z-6-22-2 were heard concurrently.
One request to speak in favor and nine requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Anthony Grande, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases GPA-
DSTV-1-22-2 and Z-6-22-2. Mr. Grande provided an overview of the location of the
request and summarized the General Plan Land Use Map designation and proposed
amendment, noting that staff recommends approval of the GPA. He described the
surrounding land uses and zoning, the proposed zoning districts, and the proposed
development, noting the unit counts in each portion and certain aspects of the open
space and trails to be provided. He summarized the community input and the staff
findings, noting that the staff recommends approval of the rezoning with stipulations.
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the setback from Cave Creek Road. Mr. Grande
replied that it is 140 feet from the property line, which would be 205 feet from the
centerline of the street.
Benjamin Tate, representative with Withey Morris, summarized the history of the
property, existing zoning, and surrounding land uses. He described the details of the
proposal, including the housing product types, network of proposed trails, the hillside
dedication to the city, the maintenance of the existing wash as a natural resource, and
the landscaping and shade aspects of the proposal. He described the existing densities
in the surrounding area, which he stated are comparable to the density of the
200 West Washington Street, 3 rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 721
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-6-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 2
applicant’s proposed development. He described the transportation aspects of the
project, including dedicating right-of-way for Cave Creek Road, a new traffic signal at
the intersection with Cave Creek Road, and the connections with the existing stub
streets.
Committee Questions
Chair Bowser asked whether the lots on the western edge are hillside lots. Mr. Tate
replied that there would be no hillside lots in the development.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he believes the proposal fits with the surrounding area,
but that he is concerned with the lots directly adjacent to the existing R1-18 zoning
district. Mr. Tate stated that the site plan concentrates a significant amount of open
space along that edge of the development to create a buffer and that the development
has an appropriate density gradient.
Committee Member Powell asked if the developer would be widening Cave Creek
Road to three southbound lanes and if there would be a change to the northbound
lanes. Mr. Tate replied that the developer would be widening the southbound side to
three lanes, but that the northbound lanes would be up to a future developer on the east
side of Cave Creek Road.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the stipulated bus stop and if there was bus
service along Cave Creek Road today. Mr. Tate replied that he didn’t believe there was
existing bus service on that corridor but that it is likely stipulated because of the
potential for future service.
Committee Member Hankins asked about the dam to the north of the project and the
remote-control air strip on the other side of the dam. Chair Bowser noted that the
question about the dam was not a land use issue. Mr. Tate replied that the remote-
control air strip doesn’t require notification, but that they would disclose the existence of
the air strip to future residents. Chair Bowser agreed that it is better to disclose it.
Mr. Powell asked if the apartments would have electric vehicle charging stations
installed. Mr. Tate stated that they would be provided, as this is now considered an
expectation in luxury buildings.
Committee Member Israel asked about the community outreach conducted. Mr. Tate
replied that they had conducted the required notifications and neighborhood meetings
and had individual conversations with neighbors to address concerns.
Mr. Israel asked if the 3-story buildings would have elevators and what the cost for
electric vehicle charging would be. Mr. Tate replied that the buildings would be walk-ups
and that the electric vehicle charging cost to the tenants is minimal and only covers the
cost of the electricity, not generating profit for the developer.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 722
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-6-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 3
Mr. Nowell asked about the density when the hillside area is subtracted from the
calculation. Mr. Tate replied that it would be 4.25 units per acre. Mr. Nowell followed up
by asking if it made more sense to be less dense closer to the preserve. Mr. Tate
agreed and stated that the development provides its largest lots and lowest densities
along the edge of the preserve, creating a desirable density gradient between the
eastern and western edges of the property.
Public Comments
Denny Hasenbank introduced himself and stated that he had moved to the
neighborhood because of the larger lots and that 80 percent of the residents are
opposed to the development. He stated that the development economics doesn’t work
out without the apartment component and that he is concerned about the minimal
architectural styling and the effect of the development on surrounding property values.
Robert Funk introduced himself and stated that adding 400 rental units is a problem, as
it would result in over 1,000 people living there. He stated that residents of this area
want single-family housing, noting that residents have made comments about
infrastructure and schools. He stated he wants to enjoy the lower density of the area.
Jeff Karau introduced himself and stated that he was concerned about the connecting
streets, which require a half-mile drive within the existing subdivision. He stated that he
suggests removing the stub street connections. He further stated that there are no
three-story buildings along this stretch of Cave Creek Road and that he believes the
height is a problem.
William Langdon introduced himself and asked about floodplain issues and stated
concerns about traffic on Hillstone Way. He asked whether a new development would
be on the adjacent hillside area. He stated that traffic on Cave Creek Road is a problem
and that there is too much density in the area. He further stated concerns about
schools.
Joe Abrahamson introduced himself and stated that the density is getting too high in
this area. He stated that he didn’t move to this area to have apartments nearby and that
they didn’t need those types of buildings in this area.
Marcy Mevorach introduced herself and stated that the population is growing and
Phoenix needs to accommodate the growth with new development. She stated that the
existing communities also had to clear vacant land, noting that eventually every piece of
land will be developed. She stated that she believes the developer is proposing a good
product.
Mead Summer introduced himself and stated that the community had argued against
the three-story request for the other multifamily development in this area and the
committee agreed to limit it to two stories. He stated that Cave Creek Road has a lot of
traffic and it’s not safe to add more, further stating concern about the stub street
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 723
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-6-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 4
connections to the existing subdivision.
Lauren Prole introduced herself and stated that she is concerned about the density of
the proposal and that Desert Peak Parkway already has a lot of traffic. She stated that
the roads are getting busier and unsafe for children. She stated that she believes
schools are an issue as well.
Brian Wilson introduced himself and stated he was concerned with the connections to
the stub streets into the existing subdivision, which doesn’t add value to the existing
residents since the new development would be gated. He stated that it would be an
expense to the existing community to take down fencing.
Z. Prole introduced himself and stated that he is concerned about the traffic generated
from the proposed project.
Chair Bowser stated that it was important to note the correct information about the
schools in the area and that the schools are under capacity.
Applicant Response
Benjamin Tate stated that the development is driven by what the General Plan calls for,
not simply economics. He stated that the connection to the stub streets is not driven by
the developer, rather by requirements of the Street Transportation Department, and that
the applicant would work with the City to see if they can make the connections
emergency only. He stated the development team had a meeting with the school
superintendent to discuss school needs and that there was no need for a new school
since the school are not at capacity. He stated that the vast majority of the traffic from
the site will be southbound and that the multifamily buildings will be over a mile from any
of the homes in the existing subdivision, where neighbors have concerns.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that the committee tries to keep the zoning similar to the
surrounding area and that the proposal fits. He stated that adding people will drive
demand for new commercial uses and that he understood the desire to limit the
development to two stories.
Chair Bowser stated that the grade of Cave Creek Road is another factor to consider.
MOTION – Z-6-22-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to recommend approval of Z-6-22-2 per the staff
recommendation. Committee Member Santoro seconded the motion.
VOTE
6-3, motion to recommend approval per staff recommendation passed; Members Dean,
Hankins, Powell, Santoro, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Members Israel, Nowell and
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 724
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-6-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 5
Reynolds against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 725
Attachment D
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
June 2, 2022
ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-6-22-2 (Companion Case GPA-DSTV-1-22-2)
Location: Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave
Creek Road and Jomax Road
From: S-1
To: R1-10, R-2, and R-3A
Acreage: 417.33
Proposal: Single-family and multifamily residential
Applicant: DR Horton, Inc.
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 5/3/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 6-3.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Desert View Village Planning
Committee recommendation, with modifications and an additional stipulation.
Motion Discussion:
The representative, Jason Morris, requested modifications to two stipulations and an addition of
a stipulation, as follows:
Stipulation 14: The developer shall connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane,
27th Place, and 29th Way, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022 but shall
be restricted to emergency access only, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department and Street Transportation Department. Additionally, the developer
shall provide pedestrian access at the above referenced street stubs to facilitate pedestrian
circulation between the development and the existing Desert Peak neighborhood.
Stipulation 31: The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development Department
and as modified by the stipulations below.
Stipulation 35: The development shall be limited to a maximum building height of two stories, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Motion details: Commissioner Perez made a MOTION to approve Z-6-22-2, per the Desert View
Village Planning Committee recommendation; with the modifications to Stipulation Nos. 14 and
31, and the additional stipulation, per the applicant’s request.
Page 726
Maker: Perez
Second: Simon
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Howard and Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The requested R1-10, R-2, and R-3A zoning districts produce an overall density and
development pattern that is consistent with the character of the surrounding area.
2. As stipulated, the proposed development appropriately shifts density away from
sensitive natural resources and closer to the major arterial of Cave Creek Road and
provides design elements that protect the surrounding natural and built environment.
3. As stipulated, the proposed development enhances connectivity in the immediate
vicinity, including multi-modal transportation options with shade elements, and
improves public access to the adjacent natural resources.
Stipulations:
OVERALL SITE
1. Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan approval, the landowner shall convey
approximately 74 acres (or an area mutually agreed upon by the city and the owner) of
hillside land selected by the City of Phoenix and located in the area depicted as
“Hillside Area” on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022, to the City of Phoenix
for the use as a City of Phoenix desert park and/or mountain preserve, as modified
and approved by the Planning and Development Department and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
2. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department to
determine a maximum of two access points to the desert park or mountain preserve
area prior to issuance of preliminary site plan approval. The access points shall be
made accessible to the public through a trail network, within and/or bounding the site,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department. In conjunction
with the electric utility provider, the developer shall also explore the possibility of
providing a public access parking lot in the utility easement area with access to the
preserve trail network.
3. A minimum landscaped setback of 140 feet shall be provided along the Cave Creek
Road frontage.
4. The required landscape setbacks along Cave Creek Road, Desert Peak Parkway, and
the perimeter setbacks for the R-2 and R-3A zoned portions of the site where adjacent
to single-family residential zoning shall be planted with a minimum of 70 percent 2-inch
caliper and 30 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
5. Within the development and along Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway, all
pedestrian paths, multi-use trails, and sidewalks, excluding sidewalks along internal
streets, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at maturity, or a combination of
Page 727
the two to provide a minimum of 75 percent shade, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
6. The developer shall dedicate 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easements (MUTE) along the
east side of Desert Peak Parkway and the west side of Cave Creek Road and
construct a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the easements in
accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall
work with the Site Planning Section on an alternative design through the technical
appeal process.
7. The developer shall construct minimum 10-foot-wide community trails and multi-use
trails, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department. Where
conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with the Site Planning Section
on an alternative design through the technical appeal process.
8. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad along
southbound Cave Creek Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according to the
from the intersection of the main access point on Cave Creek Road according to City
of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department or the Public Transit Department.
9. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a
minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area between the back of curb and sidewalk along
Cave Creek Road, planted to the following standards and as approved or modified by
the Planning and Development Department or Street Transportation Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. The developer shall construct minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks with minimum
5-foot-wide landscape areas between the back of curb and sidewalks along the
primary roadway through the subdivision, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails
Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022, planted with minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees,
25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved or modified by the Planning
and Development Department. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work
with the Planning and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate 65 feet of right-of-way along Cave Creek Road, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. The developer shall construct a 24-foot-wide landscaped median island along Desert
Peak Parkway from Hillstone Way to 23rd Street, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
Page 728
13. The developer shall align the primary roadway through the subdivision with the
intersection of Desert Peak Parkway and Hillstone Way and shall be responsible for
any modifications to the existing drainage facility and access ramp, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
14. The developer shall connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane, 27th
Place, and 29th Way, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022,
BUT SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY and as approved
or modified by the Planning and Development Department. ADDITIONALLY, THE
DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AT THE ABOVE
REFERENCED STREET STUBS TO FACILITATE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE EXISTING DESERT PEAK
NEIGHBORHOOD.
15. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a Cave Creek Road
Traffic Corridor Analysis from Sonoran Desert Drive south to the 101 Freeway to
evaluate the overall level of service and corridor conditions with impacts associated
with the proposed 1,545 dwelling units. The developer shall be responsible for regional
mitigation identified through the analysis. No preliminary approval of plans shall be
granted until the study is reviewed and approved by the Street Transportation
Department.
16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
17. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix for
the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney prior to final site plan
approval.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed development
from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis review process,
prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the Planning and
'HYHORSPHQW'HSDUWPHQWௗ
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of the
property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the templates
and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney.
20. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall conduct
Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the development
area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing and grubbing,
landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
21. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I data
testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, determines
such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II
archeological data recovery excavations.
22. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
Page 729
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.
23. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
R1-10 ZONED AREA
24. Building elevations shall depict architectural detailing applied to windows on all sides
of the homes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
25. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area for the R1-10 zoned portion of the site,
after dedication of the hillside area to the city, shall be retained as open space,
including washes and internal hillside areas, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. This requirement shall not be applied to individual phases
of the overall development.
26. A minimum of two distinct active open space areas and a minimum of three passive
open space areas shall be provided within the overall R1-10 zoned area, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
R-2 ZONED AREA
27. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations date
stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
28. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
29. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as but not
limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground equipment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
30. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks shall
be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the
clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
R-3A ZONED AREA
31. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations date
stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department AND AS MODIFIED BY THE STIPULATIONS BELOW.
32. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 730
33. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as but not
limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground equipment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
34. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks shall
be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the
clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
35. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF
TWO STORIES, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 731
Attachment E
Anthony M Grande
From: Tom Bonanno
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 7:40 PM
To: Anthony M Grande; Tom Bonanno
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)…
Hi Anthony,
I live immediately West of the proposed new Development. I understand the Village planning committee is asked to
amend the current DR Horton rezoning application to approve an additional 400 rental units on approximately 20
acres. Those 400 units allow over 1,000 people to be living in those units. This zoning request which should never be
approved. Please take the time to drive around the area as see how it is all singe‐family homes. Everyone of us wants to
remain that way. VOTE NO on the amendment.
Thank you,
Tom Bonanno
M: 602.743.9200
Page 732
Anthony M Grande
From: Sarah Crank
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 9:14 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA-DSTV-e-22-2 amendment. As a resident of this area I strongly object to the addition of 400
rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional 1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the
neighborhood. My community is less than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the value,
the character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly object to the committee
approving 400 rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Stone Butte Homeowner
Sarah Crank
sarahcrank@me.com
480.236.6232
Page 733
Anthony M Grande
From: Robert Funk
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:27 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case Z-6-22-2
Dear Anthony,
II want to go on record as strongly objecting to the proposed amendment for 400 Rental Units. A year ago my family
purchased a house in Stone Butte North that was developed by D R Horton with zoning for 1.9 houses per acre. The
zoning application next to us by the same developer will be more than double my density.
D R Hortons Rezoning Application (Case Z‐4‐6‐22‐2) is more than dense enough for this area with out adding 400 rental
units onto it. If you approve this amendment the Village Planning Committee you will not be serving the best interests
of the neighboring developments.
Please VOTE NO.
Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows
Page 734
Anthony M Grande
From: Bruce Gross
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:23 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: Bruce Gross
Subject: RE: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 Hearing
Dear Anthony,
I'm Bruce Gross and my single-family house is immediately to the west of this D R
Horton proposed development. I live in Desert Peak. I purchased my house and moved
in November 2017, to live in a nice neighborhood with the low density that my
community provides. It is also what the other communities are like around me.
I understand the Village planning committee is asked to amend the current D R Horton
rezoning application to approve an additional 400 rental units on approximately 20
acres. 400 units will allow over 1,000 people to be living in those units, plus D R Horton
want to also build a 2-story apartment complex.
Aside from destroying our “desert space” to walk-in, the impact on water and especially
getting on to Cave Creek, which is already like driving on a freeway, will make life here
in our community horrific. I hope you will consider denying this Amendment and
PLEASE VOTE NO.
Please think of our community as if you lived here as well.
Respectfully submitted,
Bruce Gross
Desert Peak owner
Bruce Gross
"Tell me and I forget.
Teach me and I remember.
Page 735
Involve me and I learn." Benjamin Franklin
Page 736
Anthony M Grande
From: Harold B. Jones, Jr.
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:41 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
I am writing in to express my opposition to the amendment of DR Horton’s application for the "Stone Butte East"
development.
I am not opposed to their original plan of 3 homes per acre, but now I hear they want to include 140
rental homes and a 260-unit apartment building which is entirely unacceptable to me. I bought my single
family home in Stone Butte believing we would see other single family homes in the future. That density
of rental homes and apartments simply do not belong in this area; we do not have the roadway capacity
nor the retail business to handle that additional population. I am convinced it will negatively affect my
quality of life, the quiet enjoyment of my home, and the valuation of my property.
Please, please do not approve their request for an amendment.
Best Regards,
Harold & Angie Jones
24218 N 22nd Street
Phoenix, AZ 85024
480-305-3328
Page 737
Anthony M Grande
From: N J
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 2:31 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Desert Peak VPC , D.R. Horton rezoning GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case Z-6-22-2)
Hello,
I live immediately west of the proposed new development by DR Horton on Desert Peak Parkway and Cave Creek Road.
I understand the village planning committee has been requested to amend the rezoning application to approve
additional rental units (D.R. Horton rezoning GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 ‐ Companion case Z‐6‐22‐2). This planned development
will significantly increase the traffic in the neighborhood and cause a lot of challenges.
DR Horton communities in Stoneview Butte North has a density of less than two houses per acre. I invested my hard‐
earned money in this neighborhood because of the low density. Now the same developer is requesting an amendment
to their rezoning application to add 400 rentals. This will more than double the density.
We strongly object to this rezoning request and recommend voting No to the amendment.
Regards
Nilesh Joshi
2108 E Chama Dr Phoenix AZ
Page 738
Anthony M Grande
From: Chris Smith
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 8:55 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA-DSTV-e-22-2 amendment. As a resident of this area I
strongly object to the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional
1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less
than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the
value, the character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density
neighborhood and strongly object to the committee approving 400 rental units in addition to the single
family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Chris Smith
Page 739
Anthony M Grande
From: William Wiltse
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 7:10 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
To Whom it May Concern,
We are relatively new homeowners in the Northview at Stone Butte neighborhood, directly west of the proposed
development referenced in case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2. I understand that the Village committee will be discussing a
proposed amendment that would allow for the building of 400 rental properties within the development. I purchased
my home in this area because of the large lot size and low density of homes. These rental units would not only have a
negative effect on nearby home values, it would also dramatically increase the amount of vehicular traffic on Cave Creek
Road. We have already noticed increased congestion in the short time since we have lived here and have concerns that
the rental units, in addition to all of the new single‐family homes, will cause this to become significantly worse.
These rental units were not part of the original neighborhood plan and should not be approved. Please consider the
impact on homeowners in the area and vote NO on this amendment.
Thank you for your consideration,
Bill & Angie Wiltse
2127 E Fallen Leaf Lane
Page 740
Anthony M Grande
From: joe@joea.com
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 6:31 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Developement hearing
I am very much opposed to this and would like to RTS for this meeting. This is just North of where I have lived for 22+
years.
Thanks,
Joe Abrahamson
Phoenix 85024
~~~~~
From: Sarah Crank
Date: April 30, 2022 at 9:13:02 AM MST
To: Bridgette Wilde, "Staff. Bridgette Wilde" , Charlie Wilde
, Beth Merkes
Subject: Village Planning Committee meeting *Action requested* - New Development by DR Horton
DR Horton is proposing a new "Stone Butte East" development which will be located between Northview and the Desert
Peak neighborhood to our east. They had originally applied for residential zoning permitting 3 homes per acre (our zoning
only allows for 1.95) but now they are looking to amend their application to include 140 rental homes and a 260-unit
apartment building which would increase that homes per acre significantly. There is an upcoming virtual meeting on May
3rd @ 6:30pm where neighbors can object to the amendment. If you would like to attend, comment, or speak at the
meeting, details can be found here: https://www.phoenix.gov/city.../PublicMeetings/220503004.pdf
Submit a comment on an agenda item:
Send your comments to: Anthony Grande at anthony.grande@phoenix.gov
By: 48 hours prior to start of the meeting - DEADLINE Sunday May1st 6:30 pm
Indicate Item Number and case number:
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Page 741
Anthony M Grande
From: jbbrabender@comcast.net
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:46 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case 2-6-22-2)
Please vote no. The area should be zoned single family residential which is consistent with the surrounding
neighborhood. I am a home owner in the North View at Stone Butte community. Thank you.
Jim Brabender
Sent from my iPhone
Page 742
Anthony M Grande
From: adesmond1
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 3:48 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert Peak VPC,
We live immediately West of this proposed new Development. The additional 400 units would impose higher traffic
volume, a basis for lower demographics to enter the area, and the area is not prepared to manage this volume and type
of household/residences. As residences of the community we experience daily issues that arise and will change with a
higher volume of people, i.e. taking our child to school; Cave Creak Dam Rd is our most direct route to access the
elementary and middle school, and cannot we widened due to homes already built. This is also a route for people to
commute to Deer Valley Road for work. As is may be possible to eventually connect Pinnacle Peak Parkway to 7th
Street, this will significantly increase traffic into our neighborhood from surrounding areas to reach other areas like
Norterra Shopping or I‐17. Obviously with this we will now be hindered with widening of streets to allow for the traffic,
leading to intersections with lights, delaying leaving and entry into the community.
As an example this happened on Norterra Parkway and North Valley Parkway and 19th avenue where two upper scale
neighborhoods of Dynamite Mountain Ranch and Fireside were suddenly built up with apartments, lowering the
demographics and increasing traffic which resulted in an intersection with a signal, included widening the road, that led
to be a common detour for people needing to avoid I‐17, not to mention increasing accidents in the neighborhood
resulting in a pedestrian being killed in what used to be a quiet, family‐oriented, safe neighborhood.
Overall growth is good, as the community CAN safely grow, with different levels of demographics which lead to
commerce that can support the surrounding area, but at this point it is difficult to see how this can be achieved as the
beautiful desert area is quickly being consumed by multilevel housing projects. Part of our investment was closing to
live outside of town and the congestion, hence investing the large sum of money to reside in a gated community. This
proposal is poorly planned as limited commerce is currently available, roads are not developed, and quite simply it will
change the landscape of our community for families hiking and riding. Multifamily dwellings such as apartments and
condominiums lead to increased crime and lower value of all surrounding neighborhoods. Transitory residents will not
be invested in our community.
Lastly, speaking of investment, the desert preserve and surrounding desert areas is another reason why we selected this
area to invest in our residence and call this our home. Not to watch it be monopolized by while DR Horton who sold lots
as a premium to us, finished selling our community, only to now submit a proposal for a new cash cow as they consume
the environment surrounding our investment with temporary low end housing with the goal of putting as many people
as possible in as small of a space as possible to make the most money. If they could would they build 4 story units rather
than just 2? When does it end? When we no longer have any mountain view and it is all a parking lot?
So as one development builds it will set the tone for more to follow. Please help us protect our property values and the
surrounding area, in keeping this community a quiet, safe, family‐oriented, home‐valued neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Ron and Andrea Desmond
2028 E Chama Dr
Phoenix, AZ 85024
(602)332‐3210
Page 743
Anthony M Grande
From: Karen Harding
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:25 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Desert View GPA Case # GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 Rezoning Case No: Z-6-22-2
Dear Mr. Grande,
As a new property owner in Stone Butte I’m writing to voice my disapproval with the proposed re‐zoning. I love my new
neighborhood and enjoy the privacy.
The proposed re‐zoning development will cause an increase in traffic, add to the air pollution, air quality and bring
excess noise. I oppose the concentration of housing you want to create. I don’t understand the need to change the
original zoning that was previously approved. The schools are already overflowing with students especially Pinnacle
High School.
I believe the zoning of the property in question should remain as is and not be changed.
My husband, William Langdon, would like to speak at your meeting. Thank you for your attention to this important
matter.
Karen Harding
William Langdon
1942 E Robb Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Will’s cell phone: 602‐549‐3948
Karen’s cell phone: 602‐330‐3743
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad [overview.mail.yahoo.com]
Page 744
Anthony M Grande
From: Matthew Harmon
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 2:13 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: Tara Harmon
Subject: Note regarding case GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 amendment. As a resident of this area I strongly object to
the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional 1000+ residents would
significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less than 2 houses per acre currently and the
addition of this amendment would significantly change the value, the character and the quiet nature of the
neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly object to the committee approving 400
rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Matt Harmon
Stone Butte Homeowner
Matt Harmon, Dealer Marketing Consultant
General Motors CSSR – Western Region
Text / Mobile: 425-309-1229
epsilon.com [epsilon.com]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Disclaimer The information in this email and any attachments may contain proprietary and confidential information that
is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, retention or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. When addressed to our clients or
vendors, any information contained in this e‐mail or any attachments is subject to the terms and conditions in any
governing contract. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please immediately contact the sender and delete the e‐
mail.
Page 745
Anthony M Grande
From: Jill Smith
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:37 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Opposition to GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA‐DSTV‐e‐22‐2 amendment. As a resident of this area (Stone Butte
North) I strongly object to the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex.
This additional 1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less
than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the value, the
character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly
object to the committee approving 400 rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Jill Smith
Page 746
Anthony M Grande
From: Kamal Jagga <1.kamal.j@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 12:47 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Action Request: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2) - I Vote No!
Dear Desert Peak PVC,
I live immediately west of this proposed new development. We bought this property because of the low population
density, healthy and safe environment for the families. Building this additional units will impact negatively the peaceful
and serene environment of our area. We strongly object to the Committee approving 400 rental units.
GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 (Companion Case Z‐6‐22‐2) ‐ I VOTE NO!
Thank you for understanding!
Regards
Kamal JAGGA
‐‐
Regards,
Kamal Jagga
Page 747
Anthony M Grande
From: Greg Pelegrin
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:17 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View Village Planning Committee,
I am a home owner adjacent to the proposed Stone Butte East development and moved into the area due to the open
space and fact that our development is less than 2 homes per acre. D.R. Horton already has zoning to build up to 5
homes per acre which is very dense for the area so why would this even be a consideration for 15+ units per acre? This is
the far north suburbs of Phoenix and the lack of transit options and nearby businesses does not warrant apartment style
housing in the area.
The other consideration for such a large number of homes being built per acre is the stress on the local infrastructure.
There are only 2 access points into and out of the proposed new development and that would lead to very heavy traffic
on both Cave Creek Rd and Desert Peak Pkwy. Also, the extra demand on current sewer and water lines and the
electrical grid in the area with 1000+ extra people living in the new proposed development.
Finally, there is already a lack of large parks and play areas for the children in the area as well as schools near capacity.
Has the project added enough room for play areas for children and room to add an additional school as needed?
Please leave this area that is zoned for single family homes the way it is to prevent much of the crowding that is
becoming more prevalent in many of the new D.R. Horton developments already built or are in the process of being built
in the Phoenix Valley.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Greg and Jaime Pelegrin
Page 748
Anthony M Grande
From: Ruffulo, Wendy
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:27 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (companion case Z-6-22-2)
We just recently purchased a Shea home just west of this planned new development. This area is all single family homes
which is one of the reasons why we selected this development. Single family homes is what we thought may be
developed, not apartments. Please vote NO.
Thank you
Get Outlook for iOS [aka.ms]
Page 749
Anthony M Grande
From: Lukas Treffers
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:44 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Good afternoon Desert Peak VPC,
I am writing you today in regards to the proposed new Development by DR Horton which includes 400 rental units. This
community primarily consists of single family homes and is one of the main reasons we chose to move here. There is low
traffic, minimal noise, and limited light pollution. With this potential addition of 400 units all of that goes out the
window. There will be an increase in traffic (accidents), noise and light pollution. This zoning request should not be
considered, myself and my fellow neighbors and community are against this. VOTE NO on this amendment.
Thank you for your time.
‐ Lukas
Page 750
Anthony M Grande
From: Tommy Ford
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:08 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Mr. Grande:
DR Horton did grading for the Northview Stone Butte several years ago and then Shea took over and started building new
homes. The 130 home gated community of Northview, is a quiet and removed area that we were drawn to almost 2 years
ago. We picked our lot, with delays it took over 1 1/2 years to finally close and move into our new home. Now almost a
month later, we are enjoying the quiet and simple life in our new community.
One of the primary reasons for buying in Northview, was the lack of traffic once you turn onto Pinnacle Peak and head
West. The area has nice homes built several years ago and only two condo complexes. We bought in Northview in part to
not live on a busy street, that would be more congested with both people, cars and noise. The area we live in is largely
homes, and is without rental apartments. Rental apartments will decrease the value of our new home, increase traffic and
congestion on Pinnacle Peak/Desert Peak, and bring a population of people who do not care about our homes and
values. We have nothing against people wanting, needing to live in apartments but they should be built in areas that
already have apartments/condos not in true residential neighborhoods.
We respectfully request to the Committee to not approve the 400 rental units, VOTE NO PLEASE.
Sincerely,
Tommy & Caroline Ford
2017 E Fallen Leaf Lane,
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Page 751
Anthony M Grande
From: Jes
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 1:40 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: jim.warning@phoenix.gov; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Stone Butte East (case nos Z-6-22 & GPA-DSTV-1-22)
To Whom it May Concern;
The upcoming plans for the development designated as "Stone Butte East" by DR Horton, creates multiple concerns for
existing residents in the neighboring areas. Desert Peak has maintained a family safe environment with low traffic,
unobstructed desert views, and a reasonable level of population. The addition of this monstrous development invades
the peacefulness that drew many of us to this area.
The following concerns exist for the majority of the current homeowners.
New construction will drive wildlife into our neighborhoods and backyards, creating dangers for our children, pets, and
ourselves.
Plans show through streets from our existing neighborhood roads and cul de sacs to the new neighborhoods, robbing us
of these areas and creating safety concerns.
The current traffic on Cave Creek is already difficult to navigate through without the addition of 4k plus new vehicles.
The plans call for a small area of Cave Creek to be widened, showing a futile attempt to appease the matter.
The continued growth of multi‐family residential areas is not something any of the current residents support.
Local schools are not equipped to support the massive spike in new residents.
Jessica White
Page 752
Racelle Escolar
From: J Karau
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 4:47 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Public comment for June 2 meeting case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Attachments: Jeff - Planning Commission Comments.docx
I am writing regarding case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 and companion case Z‐6‐22‐2. I have registered to speak but also wanted
to include a written comment with additional references. There is an old related case ( Z‐8‐04‐2 (PHO‐1‐15) ) from 2015
as well as a Google Maps link [google.com] to existing streets that dead‐ends just outside of our community.
Thanks,
Jeff
Page1 753
Racelle Escolar
From: Deanne Haverlock
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 11:24 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Re: Application Z-6-22-2 (Companion Case GPA-DSTV-1-22-2) #7
Sorry, wanted to be clear I oppose item #6 and 7 re: above application in my previous email.
Thanks!
Deanne Haverlock
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 2, 2022, at 9:56 AM, Deanne Haverlock wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> I would like to submit comment on above agenda item for re‐zoning and oppose the proposal. I am a resident in the
area and believe it’s desirable to keep the trust land open for nature and wildlife and keep the possible building on it to
a minimum to preserve the the beauty of our area.
>
> Thanks for your consideration and time.
> Respectfully,
> Deanne Haverlock
> Sent from my iPhone
Page1 754
Rcvd 6/2/2022
Desert Peak Homeowners Association
A Non-Profit Corporation
pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov
Dear Planning Commission Members,
We are writing today as the board of directors of the Desert Peak HOA, a neighboring community of 641
homes to the South of the proposed DR Horton community of Stone Butte East. During the Desert View
Village Planning Committee meeting neither the voices of the neighboring communities nor past
decisions by the Planning Commission were given much consideration before rushing to approve the
zoning changes in favor of the new community. The proposed Stone Butte East community is for the
area of over 400 acres west of Cave Creek Road and south of Jomax Road (case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 and
companion case Z-6-22-2). We strongly oppose DR Horton’s rezoning application without additional
changes.
The Desert Peak HOA and our community residents have concerns with the changes to the character of
the area with the height of the new community and concerns of traffic mainly within our community but
also in the surrounding area.
The first concern is for the overall character of the area by adding such dense new construction. During
DR Horton’s presentation they stated that the new community is a “mirror image” and just like they
“unfolded the page of a book” of the existing communities to the south. That is FALSE! The existing
communities consist of one and two-story homes, condos and apartments which fit in with the density
of the homes in the surrounding area when they were built.
In this zoning proposal DR Horton is asking for three-story buildings along Cave Creek Rd. which would
change the character of the area and set a precedent for other new communities in the future. Today,
there are NO existing three-story buildings along Cave Creek Rd. north of the 101. The residents of
multiple surrounding neighborhoods, including Desert Peak, are strongly opposed to setting the
precedent for three-story buildings in this area.
Back in 2015 a similar case was brought before the Planning commission for consideration regarding a
new apartment community at the corner of Cave Creek and Pinnacle Peak. This former rezoning case
was also brought by the same builder and was similarly seeking to build three-story apartment buildings
along Cave Creek Road. That proposal was modified to allow only two-story apartments and we ask that
you do the same in this case. The prior case for Desert Peak & Cave creek apartment was Z-8-04-2
(PHO-1-15).
Our second concern is related to the connection of the streets in the new gated community with the
streets of Desert Peak. There are three streets that are proposed to be connected to the new
community, East Rustling Oaks Ln, North 27th Pl, and North 29th Way. DR Horton has agreed to
Page 755
pedestrian access between the communities which we agree with and already have fencing with
pedestrian access at ends of those streets to support.
The issues arise due to the fact that the new community is gated so there is a one-sided benefit for the
new Stone Butte community to having vehicular ingress/egress within our community. We believe the
goals of the Complete Street Policy are fulfilled by the pedestrian gates and adding one-way access from
a private, gated community will not provide any additional benefit. If vehicle gates are required, Desert
Peak would have to pay to remove that existing fencing and pedestrian access even though we receive
no benefit from the vehicular connection. Two of the proposed connecting streets (Rustling Oaks Ln and
27th Pl) are nearly ½ mile of driving through Desert Peak to get to either major road, Cave Creek Rd or
Desert Peak Pkwy and we do not wish for our community to act as a ½ mile driveway for Stone Butte
East. This plan would add additional traffic within Desert Peak, cost the Desert Peak HOA/community
and provide no benefit to the Desert Peak community.
We disputed the facts that DR Horton claimed that this MUST be done in accordance with policy from
the Street Transportation department, but the concern was dismissed. In fact, when DR Horton built
our community of Desert Peak, they did the same thing with an existing community to the south. In that
case 25th St. was left as a dead end and the area within Desert Peak is used as a common area park. The
children in both communities enjoy walking/biking through this area for school and connecting the
neighbors. This area is just to the north of N. 25th St. and E. Casitas Del Rio Dr. (Google Maps link). We
ask that the connecting streets be removed from the plan and allow the streets of Desert Peak to remain
unchanged.
Lastly, we have serious concerns about DR Horton’s traffic study and statements that the community
will only generate additional southbound traffic and shouldn’t be a concern with adding an additional
1500+ homes. There are several streets in the area which are in need of improvement to handle the
existing traffic and adding more homes will only make matters worse. One of the areas of concern are
the bridge north of E. Lone Cactus Dr where Cave Creek narrows to 2 lanes, causing backups to Rose
Garden during high traffic hours. The intersection of Cave Creek Rd. and Pinnacle Peak to the east is
also an area of concern. Heading westbound at this intersection there are frequent backups to the
National cemetery entrance because the left turn lane is limited and there is no right turn lane. While
we understand the approach of having developers improve the areas along those roads as they are built,
we’d like to see a plan to handle the additional traffic in existing areas.
Sincerely,
Desert Peak HOA Board of Directors
Brian Wilson, President Jeff Karau, Vice President
Bruce Gross, Treasurer Lauren Prole, Secretary
John Tishuck, Director Jessica Noto, Director
Dave Dahm, Director
Page 756
Racelle Escolar
From: Margaret Rehberg
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:57 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Stone butte east
Good Afternoon
We live in Desert Peak on Rustling Oaks Ln and will be greatly impacted by the travel to Stone Butte east. They must
install a road with their own access. We will become a heavy traveled parking lot and for what?
Page1 757
Report
of the Southwest Corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road (Ordinance G-
7006)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-6-22-2
and rezone the site from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to R1-10 (Single-
Family Residence District), R-2 (Multifamily Residence District) and R-3A (Multifamily
Residence District) to allow single-family and multifamily residential. This is a
companion case to GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 and must be heard following GPA-DSTV-1-22-2.
Summary
Current Zoning: S-1
Proposed Zoning: R1-10 (388.10 acres), R-2 (14.19 acres) and R-3A (15.04 acres)
Acreage: 417.33 acres
Proposed Use: Single-family and multifamily residential.
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Applicant: DR Horton, Inc.
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 3,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a 6-3 vote.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on June 2, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Desert View Village Planning Committee
recommendation with modifications and an additional stipulation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and
Jomax Road.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: None
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
contributions are addressed in new Stipulation No. 25
All added and modified stipulations, since the Planning Commission recommendation,
are in bold font and listed below.
Staff recommends approval, subject to the following updated stipulations:
OVERA LL SITE
1. Prior to the issuance· of Final Site Plan approval, the landowner shall convey
approximately 74 acres (or an area mutually agreed upon by the city and the owner) of
hillside land selected by the City of Phoenix and located in the area depicted as
"Hillside Area" on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022, to the City of Phoenix
for the use as a City of Phoenix desert park and/or mountain preserve, as modified
and approved by the Planning and Development Department and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
2. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department to
determine a maximum of two access points to the desert park or mountain preserve
area prior to issuance of preliminary site plan approval. The access points shall be
made accessible to the public through a trail network, within and/or bounding the site,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department. In conjunction
with the electric utility provider, the developer shall also explore the possibility of
providing a public access parking lot in the utility easement area with access to the
preserve trail network.
3. A minimum landscaped setback of 140 feet shall be provided along the Cave Creek
Road frontage.
4. The required landscape setbacks along Cave Creek Road, Desert Peak Parkway, and
the perimeter setbacks for the R-2 and R-3A zoned portions of the site where adjacent
to single-family residential zoning shall be planted with a minimum of 70 percent 2-inch
caliper and 30 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
5. Within the development and along Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway, all
pedestrian paths, multi-use trails, and sidewalks, excluding sidewalks along internal
streets, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at maturity, or a combination of
the two to provide a minimum of 75 percent shade, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
6. The developer shall dedicate 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easements (MUTE) along the
east side of Desert Peak Parkway and the west side of Cave Creek Road and
construct a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the easements in
accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall
work with the Site Planning Section on an alternative design through the technical
appeal process.
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
7. The developer shall construct minimum 10-foot-wide community trails and multi-use
trails, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department. Where
conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with the Site Planning Section
on an alternative design through the technical appeal process.
8. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad along
southbound Cave Creek Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according to the
from the intersection of the main access point on Cave Creek Road according to City
of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department or the Public Transit Department.
9. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a
minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area between the back of curb and sidewalk along
Cave Creek Road, planted to the following standards and as approved or modified by
the Planning and Development Department or Street Transportation Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. The developer shall construct minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks with minimum
5-foot-wide landscape areas between the back of curb and sidewalks along the
primary roadway through the subdivision, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails
Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022, planted with minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees,
25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved or modified by the Planning
and Development Department. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work
with the Planning and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate 65 feet of right-of-way along Cave Creek Road, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. The developer shall construct a 24-foot-wide landscaped median island along Desert
Peak Parkway from Hillstone Way to 23rd Street, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
13. The developer shall align the primary roadway through the subdivision with the
intersection of Desert Peak Parkway and Hillstone Way and shall be responsible for
any modifications to the existing drainage facility and access ramp, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
14. The developer shall connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane, 27th
Place, and 29th Way, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022,
BUT SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY and as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.ADDITIONALLY, THE
DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AT THE ABOVE
REFERENCED STREET STUBS TO FACILITATE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE EXISTING DESERT PEAK
NEIGHBORHOOD.
15. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a Cave Creek Road
Traffic Corridor Analysis from Sonoran Desert Drive south to the 101 Freeway to
evaluate the overall level of service and corridor conditions with impacts associated
with the proposed 1,545 dwelling units. The developer shall be responsible for regional
mitigation identified through the analysis. No preliminary approval of plans shall be
granted until the study is reviewed and approved by the Street Transportation
Department.
16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
17. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix for
the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney prior to final site plan
approval.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed development
from the FAA pursuant to the FAA's Form-7460 obstruction analysis review process,
prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of the
property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the templates
and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney.
20. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall conduct
Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the development
area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing and grubbing,
landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
21. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I data
testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, determines
such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II
archeological data recovery excavations.
22. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.
23. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
24. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE
DOCUMENTATION THAT ADDRESSES THE FOLLOWING AS MODIFIED AND
APPROVED BY THE WATER SERVICES AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTS:
• THAT ALL HOMES IN THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE DESIGNED AND
CERTIFIED THROUGH THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S
WATERSENSE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.
• A COMMITMENT TO HAVE THE DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATE IN THE
CITY'S HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION WATER EFFICIENCY PROGRAM.
• THE UTILIZATION OF NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT VEGETATION
THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT.
• IRRIGATION RESTRICTIONS FOR UNDISTURBED AND OPEN SPACE
AREAS.
• UTILIZATION OF AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS AND SMART
CONTROLLERS.
• A COMMITMENT TO UNDERGO REGULAR WATER LEAK DETECTION
AUDITS TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY AND EFFICIENCY OF THE
IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
• A SUMMARY OF RESTRICTIONS ON THE UTILIZATION OF TURF WITHIN
THE DEVELOPMENT.
25. THE DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS), INCLUDING
A CAVE CREEK ROAD TRAFFIC CORRIDOR ANALYSIS FROM SONORAN
DESERT DRIVE SOUTH TO THE 101 FREEWAY TO EVALUATE THE OVERALL
LEVEL OF SERVICE AND CORRIDOR CONDITIONS WITH IMPACTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED 1,545 DWELLING UNITS. THE DEVELOPER
SHALL CONTRIBUTE TO REGIONAL TRAFFIC MITIGATION MPROVEMENTS
IDENTIFIED IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. ANY CONTRIBUTIONS SHALL BE
FAIRLY RELATED TO THE TRAFFIC IMPACT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AS
MODIFIED OR APPPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION AND
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS. CONTRIBUTIONS FOR
ELIGIBLE INFRASTRUCTURE ALREADY IDENTIFIED IN THE ADOPTED
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLAN MAY BE UTILIZED AS AN IMPACT FEE
CREDIT. NO PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF PLANS SHALL BE GRANTED UNTIL
THE STUDY IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.
R1-10 ZONED AREA
24- Building elevations shall depict architectural detailing applied to windows on all sides
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
26. of the homes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
� A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area for the R1-1O zoned portion of the site,
27. after dedication of the hillside area to the city, shall be retained as open space,
including washes and internal hillside areas, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. This requirement shall not be applied to individual phases
of the overall development.
2&. A minimum of two distinct active open space areas and a minimum of three passive
28. open space areas shall be provided within the overall R1-10 zoned area, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
R-2 ZONED AREA
� The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations date
29. stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
2-8-:- A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
30. including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
� There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as but not
31. limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground equipment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
� The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City of
32. Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U-and/or artistic bicycle racks shall
be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the
clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
R-3A ZONED AREA
� The development shall be in general conformance with the CASITAS OR GARDEN
33. building elevations date stamped February 4, 2022, OR THE BUILDING
ELEVATIONS JUNE 27, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department AND AS MODIFIED BY THE STIPULATIONS BELOW.
� A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
34. including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
� There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as but not
35. limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or. playground equipment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
� The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City of
36. Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U-and/or artistic bicycle racks shall
be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the
Z-6-22-2 Backup Memo
June 29, 2022
clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
� THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF
37. TWO STORIES, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.
Enclosures:
Exhibit 1: Building Elevations date stamped June 27, 2022
Approved:
Al;n
�;&2_
tephenson __,,
Deputy City Manager/Planning and Development Director
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-6-22-2) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R1-10 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT), R-2 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT), AND R-3A
(MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of 417.33-acre site located approximately 2,400 feet
southwest of the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road in a portion of
Sections 1, 2, and 11, Township 4 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in
Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from 417.33 acres of “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence
District), to 388.10 acres of “R1-10” (Single-Family Residence District), 14.19 acres of “R-
2” (Multifamily Residence District), and 15.04 acres of “R-3A” (Multifamily Residence
District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to modify
the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification change as
shown in Exhibit “B.”
Page 639
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use district
applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations, violation
of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance:
OVERALL SITE
1. Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan approval, the landowner shall convey
approximately 74 acres (or an area mutually agreed upon by the city and the
owner) of hillside land selected by the City of Phoenix and located in the area
depicted as “Hillside Area” on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022, to
the City of Phoenix for the use as a City of Phoenix desert park and/or
mountain preserve, as modified and approved by the Planning and
Development Department and the Parks and Recreation Department.
2. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department to determine a maximum of two access points to the desert park or
mountain preserve area prior to issuance of preliminary site plan approval. The
access points shall be made accessible to the public through a trail network,
within and/or bounding the site, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department. In conjunction with the electric utility provider, the
developer shall also explore the possibility of providing a public access parking
lot in the utility easement area with access to the preserve trail network.
3. A minimum landscaped setback of 140 feet shall be provided along the Cave
Creek Road frontage.
4. The required landscape setbacks along Cave Creek Road, Desert Peak
Parkway, and the perimeter setbacks for the R-2 and R-3A zoned portions of
the site where adjacent to single-family residential zoning shall be planted with
a minimum of 70 percent 2-inch caliper and 30 percent 3-inch caliper large
canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings,
with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.
5. Within the development and along Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak
Parkway, all pedestrian paths, multi-use trails, and sidewalks, excluding
sidewalks along internal streets, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at
maturity, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75 percent
shade, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
6. The developer shall dedicate 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easements (MUTE)
along the east side of Desert Peak Parkway and the west side of Cave Creek
Road and construct a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the
easements in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved
Page 640
by the Planning and Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions
exist, the developer shall work with the Site Planning Section on an alternative
design through the technical appeal process.
7. The developer shall construct minimum 10-foot-wide community trails and
multi-use trails, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails Exhibit, date
stamped April 15, 2022, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer
shall work with the Site Planning Section on an alternative design through the
technical appeal process.
8. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad
along southbound Cave Creek Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed
according to the City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with a minimum depth
of 10 feet and be located from the intersection of the main access point on
Cave Creek Road according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department or the
Public Transit Department.
9. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a
minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area between the back of curb and sidewalk
along Cave Creek Road, planted to the following standards and as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department or Street
Transportation Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at
maturity.
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. The developer shall construct minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks with
minimum 5-foot-wide landscape areas between the back of curb and sidewalks
along the primary roadway through the subdivision, as generally depicted on
the Overall Trails Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022, planted with minimum
2-inch caliper shade trees, 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department. Where
utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate 65 feet of right-of-way along Cave Creek Road,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 641
12. The developer shall construct a 24-foot-wide landscaped median island along
Desert Peak Parkway from Hillstone Way to 23rd Street, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The developer shall align the primary roadway through the subdivision with the
intersection of Desert Peak Parkway and Hillstone Way and shall be
responsible for any modifications to the existing drainage facility and access
ramp, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
14. The developer shall connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane,
27th Place, and 29th Way, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February
4, 2022 , but shall be restricted to emergency access only and as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department. Additionally, the
developer shall provide pedestrian access at the above referenced street stubs
to facilitate pedestrian circulation between the development and the existing
Desert Peak neighborhood.
15. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a Cave Creek
Road Traffic Corridor Analysis from Sonoran Desert Drive south to the 101
Freeway to evaluate the overall level of service and corridor conditions with
impacts associated with the proposed 1,545 dwelling units. The developer shall
be responsible for regional mitigation identified through the analysis. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and
approved by the Street Transportation Department.
16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
17. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to
the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney.
20. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
Page 642
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
21. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
22. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
23. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
R1-10 ZONED AREA
24. Building elevations shall depict architectural detailing applied to windows on all
sides of the homes, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
25. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area for the R1-10 zoned portion of
the site, after dedication of the hillside area to the city, shall be retained as
open space, including washes and internal hillside areas, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. This requirement shall not be applied
to individual phases of the overall development.
26. A minimum of two distinct active open space areas and a minimum of three
passive open space areas shall be provided within the overall R1-10 zoned
area, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
R-2 ZONED AREA
27. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
28. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open
space, including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
29. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as
but not limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground
equipment, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 643
30. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the
bicycle racks shall be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per
unit, located near the clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed
per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
R-3A ZONED AREA
31. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department and as modified by the stipulations below.
32. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open
space, including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
33. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as
but not limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground
equipment, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
34. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the
bicycle racks shall be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per
unit, located near the clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed
per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
35. The development shall be limited to a maximum building height of two stories,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of July, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
Page 644
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 645
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-6-22-2
R1-10 PORTION
A portion of land being situated within Sections 2 and 11, Township 4 North, Range
3 East of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a found Brass Cap flush with sectional markings accepted as the
Southwest corner of said Section 2, from which a found pk nail with tag RLS 24513,
accepted as the West Quarter corner of said Section 11 thereof bears
South 00°08’39” West, 2633.00 feet;
Thence North 00°13'20" East, 2671.37 feet along the west line of the Southwest
quarter of said Section 2 to the West quarter corner thereof;
Thence North 00°15'45" East, 332.46 feet, along the West line of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 2;
Thence leaving said West line, North 89°59'19" East, 1321.50 feet;
Thence South 00°20'29" West, 333.43 feet to the East-West Mid-Section line of
said Section 2;
Thence along said East-West Mid-Section line, South 89°58'10" East, 1321.02 to
the center of said Section 2;
Thence continuing along said East-West Mid-Section line, South 89°58'10" East,
2227.84 feet;
Thence leaving said East-West Mid-Section Line, South 27°34'34" West, 1215.06
feet;
Thence South 62°24'20" East, 892.49 feet to the centerline of Cave Creek Road;
Thence along said centerline, South 27°32'28" West, 1349.60 feet to the South
line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 2, being the Northeast corner of Desert
Peak Unit 4, as recorded in Book 856 of Plats, Page 34, Records of Maricopa
County, Arizona;
Thence along said North line, North 89°45'55" West, 984.72 feet to the Northwest
corner of said Desert Peak Unit 4;
Thence along the West line of said Desert Peak Unit 4, South 56°53'47" West,
2315.89 feet, to the Southwest corner of said Desert Peak Unit 4 and the Northwest
Page 646
corner of Desert Peak Unit 3, as recorded in Book 849 of Plats, Page 12,
Records of Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence along the West line of said Desert Peak Unit 3 and the West line of
Desert Peak Unit 2, as recorded in Book 836 of Plats, Page 39, Records of
Maricopa County, Arizona, South 56°53'50" West, 1416.19 feet to the North right
of way line of Desert Peak Parkway;
Thence along said North right of way line, North 13°38'22" West, 17.64 feet to
the beginning of a tangent curve, concave Southwest, having a radius of 1483.00
feet;
Thence Northwesterly along said curve, through a central angle of 30°16'46", an
arc length of 783.73 feet to a non-tangent line, being the West line of the
Northwest quarter of said Section 11;
Thence along said West line, North 00°08'39" East, 1356.49 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
R-2 PORTION
A portion of land being situated within Sections 1 and 2, Township 4 North, Range 3
East of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more
particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at a found Brass Cap flush with sectional markings accepted as the
Southwest corner of said Section 2, from which a found pk nail with tag RLS 24513,
accepted as the West Quarter corner of Section 11, Township 4 North, Range 3 East,
bears South 00°08’39” West, 2633.00 feet;
Thence North 00°13’20” East, 2232.60 feet along the West line of the Southwest quarter
of said Section 2;
Thence leaving said West line, South 89°46’40” East, 4634.46 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Thence South 62°24'00" East, 890.05 feet;
Thence South 27°12'51" West, 351.89 feet;
Thence South 27°32'28" West, 350.75 feet;
Thence North 62°24'20" West, 892.49 feet;
Thence North 27°34'34" East, 702.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Page 647
R-3A PORTION
A portion of land being situated within Sections 1 and 2, Township 4 North, Range 3
East of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more
particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at a found Brass Cap flush with sectional markings accepted as the
Southwest corner of said Section 2, from which a found pk nail with tag RLS 24513,
accepted as the West Quarter corner of Section 11, Township 4 North, Range 3 East,
bears South 00°08’39” West, 2633.00 feet;
Thence North 00°13’20” East, 2232.60 feet along the West line of the Southwest quarter
of said Section 2;
Thence leaving said west line, South 89°46’40” East, 4634.46 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Thence North 27°34'34" East, 512.34 feet to the east-west mid-section of said Section
2;
Thence along said mid-section line, South 89°58'10" East, 414.04 feet to the East
quarter corner of said Section 2;
Thence South 89°05'03" East, 578.35 feet along the East-West mid-section line of said
Section 1;
Thence leaving said mid-section line, South 27°12'51" West, 963.71 feet; Thence North
62°24'00" West, 890.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Page 648
Page 649
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Desert View Village Planning Committee May 3, 2022
Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 2, 2022
Request From: S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District)
(417.33 acres)
Request To: R1-10 (Single-Family Residence District)
(388.10 acres), R-2 (Multifamily Residence
District) (14.19 acres), and R-3A
(Multifamily Residence District) (15.04
acres)
Proposed Use: Single-family and multifamily residential
Location: Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the
southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and
Jomax Road
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Applicant: DR Horton, Inc.
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
Current
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Preserves/2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre
General Plan Land Use Map Designation Future Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit
per acre
Proposed (GPA-1-DSTV-22-2) for 29.48
acres
Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Page 650
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
General Plan Conformity
Width varies from 33-
Cave Creek Major Arterial
foot to 73.15-foot west
Road (Scenic Drive)
Street Map Classification half street
Desert Peak
Major Arterial 70-foot east half street
Parkway
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
CERTAINTY & CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLES: Promote neighborhood identity
through planning that reinforces the existing landscaping and character of the area.
Each new development should contribute to the character identified for the village;
Integrate into the development design natural features such as washes, canals,
significant topography and existing vegetation, which are important in providing
character to new subdivisions.
As stipulated, the proposed development will reinforce the character of the area by
dedicating land to the City for the Sonoran Preserve, providing a public trail network with
access points to the desert park/mountain preserve area, and by maintaining the existing
wash and hillside areas within the subdivision as natural features. These design elements
enhance the desert character of the Village and incorporate natural features that promote
the identity of the Village.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The requested R1-10, R-2, and R-3A zoning districts would allow development of a new
residential community that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and respectful of
local conditions. The overall proposed density of the site is similar to densities in the
surrounding neighborhood and as stipulated, the proposal incorporates large setbacks,
landscaping, and density limits that prevent the development from having a negative
impact on the surrounding area.
Page 651
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
General Plan Conformity
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development
and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposal will be required to provide shade along the adjacent public sidewalks and
trails, in addition to the internal pedestrian pathways. This will help to provide shade for
pedestrians and bicyclists in and around the community and to mitigate the urban heat
island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus cooling the micro-climate around the vicinity.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
North Land Use Plan: See Background Item No. 7.
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 8.
Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 9.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 10.
Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 11.
Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 12.
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant S-1
North Vacant and recreation area S-1
South Single-family residential S-1 (Approved R1-8), R1-8
East (across Cave Creek
Vacant S-1 (Approved R1-6, C-2)
Road)
West (including across Single-family residential and
R1-18, R1-6, PUD
Desert Peak Parkway) vacant
Page 652
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
R1-10 – Single-Family Residence District
(Planned Residential Development Option)
Provisions on the
Standards R1-10 Requirements
proposed site plan
Gross Acreage - 388.10 acres
Total Maximum Number of 1,358 units, up to 1,746 with 1,145 units (Met)
Units bonus
Maximum Density 3.5 dwelling units per acre, up 2.95 dwelling units per acre
to 4.5 with bonus (Met)
Minimum Lot Width 45 feet 45 feet (Met)
Minimum Lot Depth None, except 110 feet 100 to 130 feet (Met)
adjacent to freeway or arterial
Maximum Building Height 2 stories and 30 feet 2 stories and less than 29
feet (Met)
Maximum Lot Coverage 40 percent, up to 50 percent Not specified
including attached shade
structures
Minimum Parking 2 spaces per dwelling unit Not specified
2,290 spaces required
MINIMUM PERIMETER BUILDING SETBACKS
Perimeter Streets 15 feet (in addition to Not specified
landscape setback)
Perimeter Property Lines Rear: 15 feet (1-story), Not specified
(Side and Rear) 20 feet (2-story)
Side: 10 feet (1-story), 15 feet
(2-story)
MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS AND STANDARDS
Common landscaped 15 feet average, 10 feet Cave Creek Road: 140 feet
setback adjacent to minimum (Met)
perimeter streets
Desert Peak Parkway: 15
feet (Met)
Minimum Common Area 5 percent of gross site area 15.76 percent (Met)
Page 653
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
R-2 - Multifamily Residence District
(Planned Residential Development Option)
Provisions on the
Standards Requirements
Proposed site Plan
Gross Acreage - 14.19 acres
Total Maximum Number of 149 units, up to 170 with 140 units
Units bonus
Maximum Density 10.5 dwelling units per 9.87 dwelling units per
acre, up to 12 with bonus acre (Met)
Maximum Lot Coverage 45 percent Not specified
Building Height/Stories 2 stories and 30 feet for 2 stories and less than
first 150 feet; 1 foot 28 feet (Met)
increase in height for 5
feet of additional building
setback, up to 48 feet
and 4 stories
Minimum Perimeter Setbacks
Adjacent to public street 20 feet Not specified
Adjacent to property line 10 feet Not specified
Minimum Interior Building Setbacks
Front 10 feet Not specified
Minimum Perimeter Landscape Setbacks
Adjacent to public street 20 feet Not specified
Adjacent to property line 5 feet Not specified
Minimum Open space 5 percent Not specified
Minimum parking 1.3 spaces per efficiency Not specified
unit; 1.5 spaces per 1 or
2 bedroom unit; 2 spaces
per 3 or more bedroom
unit; 1.0 spaces per unit
of less than 600 square
feet
Page 654
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
R-3A - Multifamily Residence District
(Planned Residential Development Option)
Provisions on the
Standards Requirements
Proposed site Plan
Gross Acreage - 15.04 acres
Total Maximum Number of 347 units, up to 397 with 260 units
Units bonus
Maximum Density 23.1 dwelling units per 17.29 dwelling units per
acre, up to 26.4 with acre (Met)
bonus
Maximum Lot Coverage 45 percent Not specified
Maximum Building Height 3 stories and 40 feet for 3 stories and 33 feet
150 feet; 1 foot increase (Met)
in height for 5 feet of
additional building
setback, up to 48 feet
and 4 stories
Minimum Perimeter Setbacks
Adjacent to public street 20 feet Not specified
Adjacent to property line 15 feet Not specified
Minimum Interior Building Setbacks
Front 10 feet Not specified
Minimum Perimeter Landscape Setbacks
Adjacent to public street 20 feet Not specified
Adjacent to property line 5 feet Not specified
Minimum Open space 5 percent Not specified
Minimum Parking 1.3 spaces per efficiency Not specified
unit; 1.5 spaces per 1 or
2 bedroom unit; 2 spaces
per 3 or more bedroom
unit; 1.0 spaces per unit
of less than 600 square
feet
Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 417.33 acres located approximately 2,400 feet southwest
of the southwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road from S-1 (Ranch or
Page 655
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Farm Residence District) to R-10 (Single-Family Residence District), R-2
(Multifamily Residence District), and R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) for a
detached single-family residential and two multifamily residential communities. The
site is undeveloped vacant land, owned by the Arizona State Land Department,
which was recently auctioned. Ownership is in transition to the applicant, DR Horton
Inc.
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
2. The majority of the subject site is
designated as Residential 2 to 5 dwelling
units per acre on the General Plan Land
Use Map. Additionally, the northwest
portion of the site is designated as Future
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per
acre, and Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre. Finally, the
northern portion of the site contains a
narrow portion of land designated as
Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned.
General Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning
and Development Department
The applicant is proposing a minor General Plan Amendment (GPA-DSTV-1-22-2),
which would change portions of the northeast corner of the subject site from
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
to Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre and Residential 15+ dwelling units per
acre. These designations would be coterminous with the proposed R-2 and R-3A
zoning districts, respectively. The proposed zoning districts are consistent with the
proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation.
PROPOSAL
3. Site Plan
The applicant proposes to develop a new residential community, which would
include a 1,145-lot detached single-family residential community. The development
also proposes two multifamily portions, described as Casitas and Garden on the
conceptual site plan, with a total of 400 multifamily units. The overall density would
be approximately 3.7 dwelling units per acre. The conceptual site plan depicts a
range of lot sizes within the single-family residential portion, from 4,500 square feet
to 8,450 square feet.
Page 656
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Conceptual Site Plan, Source: ABLA Studio
Staff does not recommend general conformance to the site plan, as this is a large
development, and the specific layout of lots and streets could change during the
subdivision and site plan review process. Staff is recommending several stipulations
that require certain aspects of the site plan to be maintained, as described below.
The conceptual site plan includes a 74.82-acre hillside area in the northwest portion
of the site, which is intended to be conveyed to the City of Phoenix Parks and
Recreation Department for development of a future park or mountain preserve. This
conveyance is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of Future
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre for the northwest hillside area. The
developer also intends to provide public access to the preserve area through two
access points within the subdivision, including a trail network and the possibility of a
Page 657
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
public parking area to ensure the public has access to the preserve. These aspects
of the plan are incorporated in Stipulation Nos. 1 and 2.
Staff recommends the following site plan elements to be incorporated:
• A minimum 140-foot landscape setback along Cave Creek Road, consistent
with the designation as a scenic corridor (Stipulation No. 3);
• Enhanced landscaping with 70 percent two-inch and 30 percent three-inch
caliper trees, planted 20 feet on center and five, five-gallon shrubs per tree
within landscape setbacks along Cave Creek Road, Desert Peak Parkway
and the perimeter setbacks of the R-2 and R-3A zoned areas (Stipulation No.
4);
• Minimum 15 percent open space (after the dedication of the hillside area)
provided within the R1-10 zoned area (Stipulation No. 25);
• Minimum 10 percent open space provided within each of the R-2 and R-3A
zoned areas (Stipulation Nos. 28 and 32);
• A minimum of two active and three passive open space areas provided within
the R1-10 zoned area (Stipulation No. 26);
• A minimum of five amenities provided within the open space areas for the R-
2 and R-3A zoned areas (Stipulation Nos. 29 and 33).
4. Overall Trails Exhibit
The applicant has submitted an Overall Trails Exhibit, which depicts the location of a
proposed trail network within and surrounding the site. It includes multi-use trails
along the entire frontages of Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway and a
combination of multi-use trails, community trails, and detached sidewalks through
the site connecting the two frontages along three separate paths. The development
does not intend to be closed to pedestrians. Public access easements will be
required to meet the public access requirement for the access points to the
preserve. It is expected that the internal multi-use trails will contain easements
sufficient to fulfill this requirement, but the plan for access will be finalized at a later
date in consultation with the Parks and Recreation Department, per Stipulation No.
2.
Page 658
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Overall Trails Exhibit, Source: ABLA Studio
Staff recommends the following elements of the Overall Trails Exhibit to be
incorporated into the development:
• A 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) and 30-foot-wide multi-use trail
easement (MUTE) shall be provided along both perimeter frontages
(Stipulation No. 6);
• Ten-foot-wide community trails and multi-use trails shall be provided within
the development, where indicated on the plan (Stipulation No. 7);
• A detached sidewalk shall be provided along the primary roadway through
the development, as indicated on the plan, including two-inch caliper shade
trees planted 25 feet on center planted between the sidewalk and the back of
the curb (Stipulation No. 10).
Page 659
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
5. Single-Family Elevations
The conceptual building elevations for the single-family homes depict one- and two-
story homes with a variety of architectural styles and variation in colors, textures,
and facades. Staff recommends enhancing the four-sided architectural component
by requiring architectural detailing to the windows on all sides of the buildings
(Stipulation No. 24).
Conceptual Single-Family Building Elevations, Source: DR Horton
Page 660
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Conceptual Single-Family Building Elevations, Source: DR Horton
6. Multifamily Elevations
Staff recommends general conformance to the multifamily building elevations within
both the R-2 zoned areas, labeled “Casitas” on the site plan and elevations, and the
R-3A zoned areas, labeled “Garden” on the site plan and “Tuck-Under Multifamily”
and “Carriage Multifamily” on the elevations. The elevations depict multifamily
buildings with a variety of architectural styles and variation in colors, textures, and
facades, as well as four-sided architecture. The Casitas building elevations depict
one- and two-story buildings with a maximum height of less than 28 feet. The
Garden building elevations depict two- and three-story buildings with a maximum
height of 33 feet. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 27 and 31.
Page 661
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Conceptual Building Elevations (Casitas), Source: DHI Communities
Page 662
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Conceptual Building Elevations (Garden), Source: DHI Communities
Page 663
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
STUDIES AND POLICIES
7. North Land Use Plan
In 1996, the Phoenix City Council adopted the North Land Use Plan, which
established recommendations for land use and future development for the area
generally bounded by Cave Creek Wash to the west, Scottsdale Road to the east,
Carefree Highway to the north, and Pinnacle Peak Road to the south. The plan
shifted residential density designations from the previous General Plan Land Use
Map with the goals of protecting the desert character, recognizing washes as a
development constraint, and maximizing infrastructure efficiency. The subject site is
designated as Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre in the plan. Figure 22 in the
plan also denotes the site as an area containing extra infrastructure capacity, noting
that density should be move toward areas of extra capacity to increase
infrastructure efficiency.
The proposed development includes a range of densities and a large area to be set-
aside for a desert preserve or mountain park. The overall site is proposed at a
density of 3.7 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the designation in the
North Land Use Plan. The site plan shifts density away from the hillside preserve
area to the west and closer to the major arterial of Cave Creek Road. While this
creates areas within the development that exceeds 5 dwelling units per acre, the
overall average density is consistent with the recommendations in the North Land
Use Plan, in addition to the preservation of sensitive areas to the west and
incorporation of washes as preserved resources within the community.
Page 664
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
8. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached from
the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide
thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. Staff is
recommending the following stipulations designed to provide trees and enhance
shade within the development.
• Seventy percent two-inch caliper and 30 percent three-inch caliper trees
within the required landscape setbacks (Stipulation No. 4);
• Shaded pedestrian paths, multi-use trails, and sidewalks to provide a
minimum of 75 percent shade (Stipulation No. 5);
• The sidewalks along Cave Creek Road and the internal primary roadway
through the development shall be detached with landscaped areas between
the sidewalk and the back of the curb (Stipulation Nos. 9 and 10).
9. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To promote safety and connectivity for
pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users, staff is recommending detached sidewalks
along Cave Creek Road and the internal primary roadway, multi-use trails and
pedestrian paths on the perimeter streets and within the development, construction
and dedication of a new bus stop pad on Cave Creek Road, and bicycle parking in
the multifamily portions of the development. These are addressed in Stipulation
Nos. 6 through 10, 30, and 34.
10. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of destinations.
As stipulated, the project will provide bicycle parking spaces within the multifamily
portions of the development, installed per the requirements of the Walkable Urban
(WU) Code. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 30 and 34.
11. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. The City of Phoenix offers
Page 665
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
recycling services for single-family residential properties.
12. Housing Phoenix
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid
population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000
new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a
primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development
supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by
contributing to a variety housing types that will address the supply shortage at a
more rapid pace while using vacant land in a more sustainable fashion.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
13. As of the writing of this report, staff received eight letters in opposition to this
request. The letters cited issues with the proposed density and character of the
area, increased traffic, impacts to wildlife, and a lack of nearby retail and open
space.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
14. The Parks and Recreation Department requires the dedication of a multi-use trail
easement and construction of a multi-use trail along Cave Creek Road and Desert
Peak Parkway adjacent to this development. These comments are addressed in
Stipulation No. 6.
15. The Street Transportation Department commented that the developer shall provide
detached sidewalks along Cave Creek Road, construct a 24-foot landscaped
median island along Desert Peak Parkway, align the primary roadway through the
subdivision with the intersection of Desert Peak Parkway and Hillstone Way, and
connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane, 27th Place, and 29th
Way. Other comments provided pertained to adjacent right-of-way dedication and
street construction, traffic impact study requirement, and other general street
improvement requirements. These comments are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 9
and 11 through 16.
16. The Public Transit Department commented that the developer shall dedicate right-
of-way and construct one bus stop pad along southbound Cave Creek Road,
meeting the requirements of the City of Phoenix. This comment is addressed in
Stipulation No. 8.
Page 666
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
17. The Water Services Departments commented that a water and sewer main
extension will be required and a water and sewer master plan will need to be
submitted during the development review process. However, no stipulations are
required for the rezoning case. Furthermore, capacity is a dynamic condition that
can change over time due to a variety of factors. The City intends to provide water
and sewer service, requirements and assurances for which are determined during
the site plan review process. For any given property, water and sewer requirements
may vary over time to be less or more restrictive depending on the status of the
City’s water and sewer infrastructure.
18. The Aviation Department requires that the property owner record a Notice to
Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport in order to disclose the existence,
and operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. Furthermore, that an avigation easement is dedicated to the City of
Phoenix as this property is within the Deer Valley Airport traffic pattern airspace and
seeking noise sensitive land uses. Lastly, that a No Hazard Determination for the
proposed development be provided from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460
obstruction analysis review process. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 17
through 19.
19. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. If
further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site and
immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous archaeological
projects have been conducted within this project area, it is recommended that
archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted. Phase II
archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based upon the results
of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this determination in consultation
with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event archaeological materials are
encountered during construction, all ground disturbing activities must cease within a
33-foot radius of the discovery and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be
notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 20 through 22.
20. The Floodplain Management division of the Public Works Department did not have
any comments on this case.
21. The Fire Department commented that there were no anticipated problems with the
referenced case and that the water supply will be required to meet fire flow
standards in the fire code.
OTHER
22. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in
Page 667
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by
the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require
the form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 23.
23. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements such as obtaining a
use permit to conduct the proposed outdoor use in this zoning district. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be
required.
Findings
1. The requested R1-10, R-2, and R-3A zoning districts produce an overall density and
development pattern that is consistent with the character of the surrounding area.
2. As stipulated, the proposed development appropriately shifts density away from
sensitive natural resources and closer to the major arterial of Cave Creek Road and
provides design elements that protect the surrounding natural and built environment.
3. As stipulated, the proposed development enhances connectivity in the immediate
vicinity, including multi-modal transportation options with shade elements, and
improves public access to the adjacent natural resources.
Stipulations
OVERALL SITE
1. Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan approval, the landowner shall convey
approximately 74 acres (or an area mutually agreed upon by the city and the
owner) of hillside land selected by the City of Phoenix and located in the area
depicted as “Hillside Area” on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022, to
the City of Phoenix for the use as a City of Phoenix desert park and/or mountain
preserve, as modified and approved by the Planning and Development
Department and the Parks and Recreation Department.
2. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department to determine a maximum of two access points to the desert park or
mountain preserve area prior to issuance of preliminary site plan approval. The
access points shall be made accessible to the public through a trail network,
within and/or bounding the site, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department. In conjunction with the electric utility provider, the
Page 668
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
developer shall also explore the possibility of providing a public access parking
lot in the utility easement area with access to the preserve trail network.
3. A minimum landscaped setback of 140 feet shall be provided along the Cave
Creek Road frontage.
4. The required landscape setbacks along Cave Creek Road, Desert Peak
Parkway, and the perimeter setbacks for the R-2 and R-3A zoned portions of the
site where adjacent to single-family residential zoning shall be planted with a
minimum of 70 percent 2-inch caliper and 30 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy
drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-
gallon shrubs per tree, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.
5. Within the development and along Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway,
all pedestrian paths, multi-use trails, and sidewalks, excluding sidewalks along
internal streets, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at maturity, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75 percent shade, as approved
or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
6. The developer shall dedicate 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easements (MUTE)
along the east side of Desert Peak Parkway and the west side of Cave Creek
Road and construct a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the
easements in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist,
the developer shall work with the Site Planning Section on an alternative design
through the technical appeal process.
7. The developer shall construct minimum 10-foot-wide community trails and multi-
use trails, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails Exhibit, date stamped April
15, 2022, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with
the Site Planning Section on an alternative design through the technical appeal
process.
8. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad along
southbound Cave Creek Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according
to the City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet
and be located from the intersection of the main access point on Cave Creek
Road according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department or the Public Transit
Department.
Page 669
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
9. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a
minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area between the back of curb and sidewalk
along Cave Creek Road, planted to the following standards and as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department or Street Transportation
Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at
maturity.
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. The developer shall construct minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks with
minimum 5-foot-wide landscape areas between the back of curb and sidewalks
along the primary roadway through the subdivision, as generally depicted on the
Overall Trails Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022, planted with minimum 2-inch
caliper shade trees, 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts
arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department
on an alternative design solution consistent with a pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate 65 feet of right-of-way along Cave Creek Road, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. The developer shall construct a 24-foot-wide landscaped median island along
Desert Peak Parkway from Hillstone Way to 23rd Street, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The developer shall align the primary roadway through the subdivision with the
intersection of Desert Peak Parkway and Hillstone Way and shall be responsible
for any modifications to the existing drainage facility and access ramp, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
14. The developer shall connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane,
27th Place, and 29th Way, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February
4, 2022 and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.
Page 670
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
15. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a Cave Creek Road
Traffic Corridor Analysis from Sonoran Desert Drive south to the 101 Freeway to
evaluate the overall level of service and corridor conditions with impacts
associated with the proposed 1,545 dwelling units. The developer shall be
responsible for regional mitigation identified through the analysis. No preliminary
approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and approved by
the Street Transportation Department.
16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
17. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the
templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by
the City Attorney.
20. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
21. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I
data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
22. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
Page 671
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
23. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.
R1-10 ZONED AREA
24. Building elevations shall depict architectural detailing applied to windows on all
sides of the homes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
25. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area for the R1-10 zoned portion of
the site, after dedication of the hillside area to the city, shall be retained as open
space, including washes and internal hillside areas, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. This requirement shall not be applied to individual
phases of the overall development.
26. A minimum of two distinct active open space areas and a minimum of three
passive open space areas shall be provided within the overall R1-10 zoned area,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
R-2 ZONED AREA
27. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
28. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
29. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as
but not limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground equipment,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
30. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City
of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks
shall be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located
near the clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
Page 672
Staff Report: Z-6-22-2
April 29, 2022
R-3A ZONED AREA
31. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
32. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
33. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as
but not limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground equipment,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
34. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City
of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks
shall be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located
near the clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
Writer
Anthony Grande
April 29, 2022
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped February 4, 2022 (1 page)
Conceptual Overall Trails Exhibit date stamped April 15, 2022 (1 page)
Conceptual Building Elevations and renderings date stamped February 4, 2022 (35
pages; note: not all elevations submitted are included herein but are available to view as
part of the rezoning case file)
Community Correspondence (8 pages)
Page 673
Desert Maintenance
Character B
S-1
Overlay District
JOMAX RD
PUD *
ANX 254
Z-43-02 R1-6 *
Z-61-06
Z-46-19
HAPPY VALLEY ROAD ALIGNMENT
W LN
LO
OL
IE TH
FALLEN QU C-2 *
R1-18*
L
LE
AF TR
G
RIN
LN SP Z-61-06
DY
ANX 254 R1-8 PRD * S HA
DESERT PEAK PKWY
Z-43-02 Z-8-04
R1-8 *
CREEK RD GU
ARO PARK
RID
GE SA
LN Z-61-06
R1-6 *
Y 29
TH
A
W
AY R1-6 *
R1-8 PRD*
ST
S-1
NE W
TH
ANX 254 HI L LS
TO 24 RK Z-61-06
PA RD
PL
Z-43-0223 Z-8-04
K
EW
TH
L VI CR
TP
L
PL RP EE
21S LE IB E
ER N
LIE B
L
D
ST ST CA
R1-8
ST
AR
T D RD TH VE
TS ME 25 27
ALA
21S
TH
PRD* 28
TH
R1-8* ANX 254 RO
22ND WAY
BB ST
R1-6 ANX 254 Z-43-02 PL LN M
IN
E C-2 *
Z-65-97 Z-43-02 Z-8-04 25T
H CR
E
Z-14-04 R-2 PRD* EK
RD Z-61-06
ANX 187 MISTY WILLOW LN Z-8-04
R1-8 *
I
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD
Z-6-22 LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
JOMAX RD
0.2 0.1 0 0.2
HAPPY VALLEY RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101BLVD
MAYO
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
DR Horton, Inc.
FROM:
S-1 ( 417.33 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
4/14/2022
Z-6-22 REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
R1-10 ( 388.10 a.c.)
R-3A ( 15.04 a.c.)
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
417.33 Acres QS 46-33, 46-34, 47-33,
O-10, O-9, P-9 TO: R-2 ( 14.19 a.c.)
47-34, 48-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 417 N/A
R1-10, R-3A, R-2 1358, 331, 142 1746, 397, 170
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-6-22.mxd
Page 674
Desert Maintenance
Character B
S-1
Overlay District
JOMAX RD
PUD *
ANX 254
Z-43-02 R1-6 *
Z-61-06
Z-46-19
HAPPY VALLEY ROAD ALIGNMENT
W LN
LO
OL
IE TH
FALLEN QU C-2 *
R1-18*
L
LE
AF TR
G
RIN
LN SP Z-61-06
DY
ANX 254 R1-8 PRD * S HA
DESERT PEAK PKWY
Z-43-02 Z-8-04
R1-8 *
CREEK RD GU
ARO PARK
RID
GE SA
LN Z-61-06
R1-6 *
Y 29
TH
A
W
AY R1-6 *
R1-8 PRD*
ST
S-1
NE W
TH
ANX 254 HI L LS
TO 24 RK Z-61-06
PA RD
PL
Z-43-0223 Z-8-04
K
EW
TH
L VI CR
TP
L
PL RP EE
21S LE IB E
ER N
LIE B
L
D
ST ST CA
R1-8
ST
AR
T D RD TH VE
TS ME 25 27
ALA
21S
TH
PRD* 28
TH
R1-8* ANX 254 RO
22ND WAY
BB ST
R1-6 ANX 254 Z-43-02 PL LN M
IN
E C-2 *
Z-65-97 Z-43-02 Z-8-04 25T
H CR
E
Z-14-04 R-2 PRD* EK
RD Z-61-06
ANX 187 MISTY WILLOW LN Z-8-04
R1-8 *
I
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD
Z-6-22 LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
JOMAX RD
0.2 0.1 0 0.2
HAPPY VALLEY RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101BLVD
MAYO
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
DR Horton, Inc.
FROM:
S-1 ( 417.33 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
4/14/2022
Z-6-22 REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
R1-10 ( 388.10 a.c.)
R-3A ( 15.04 a.c.)
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
417.33 Acres QS 46-33, 46-34, 47-33,
O-10, O-9, P-9 TO: R-2 ( 14.19 a.c.)
47-34, 48-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 417 N/A
R1-10, R-3A, R-2 1358, 331, 142 1746, 397, 170
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-6-22.mxd
Page 675
#H , . 9;
#'; )'1; # - ) -*0;- ; ; ;3 ;8;
) 1;- ; ; ;
5. ;- ; ;
#'; )'1; # - )
%%.! ;- ; ;;
2-).' 0 *); . ( )1; ;
8 - ;((;);# )# ;)#
. )!;*-- *-; ; ;
0() ;$' ;
*, );., ;- ; ;; ;
'((;# 1;);# )# 1*1%;*, );., ; ;;
)#;0() ;$' 3)"1; *3)1!1"7; ' 6;
- ); 3 ;
. 1.; ;4;
; ;'1;';#';$' ;
: ;%*1; 3; ;
9; :;$'#$#(;/ ; : ;%*2; 4;
:;%*2; 3 ;
0() ;/ ; :;%*2; 3; ;
: ;%*2; 3; ;
, . ;;,- %;2*1%; ;3;
, . ;;
-*0;- ; ;
) 1;- ; ;;
!H 5. ;- ; ;
H3H?7=H@/9/2=H>/?8D/FH . )!;*-- *-; ;; ;
*, );., ;- ; ; ;
A3;>3H/?7G=, )* # H > 3) 1; *3)1!1$7; ' 6;
-$# # H 1= : ;%*2; ;4;
)HH
:;%*2; 3; ;
:;%*2; 4 ;
, . ;;,- %;1*2%; ; 3 ;
(H =?A=<
H<HA6H/C3
>6=3<7EH /?7G=) 1;- ; /+
, )* # H -$# # H 5. ;- ; ;
"%%.! ;- ; ;
)HH
1= 1*1%;*, );., ; ;;
3) 1; *3)1 1 7; ' 6;
: ;%*2; ;4; ;
/22?3@@H 9=1/A32H<=?A6H/<2H@=BA6H :;%*2; ;4;
:;%*2; ;4; ;
=4HA63H 6/>>FHC/993FH : ;%*1; 4 ;
/975<;3
1*1%;
>6=3<7EH /?7G=
/>>971/1=
3E7@A7<5HG=<7<5H H %%.# ;- ; ;;
2-).' 0 *); . ( )1; ; ;
>?=>=@32HG=<7<5H (:H&(%H( H&(%H
( H &(% *, );., ;- ; ;
;$+; (/; ;!; ;"; (/; ;%,; 5?=@@H/1?3/53H H/1H 1*1%;*, );., ; ;; ;
3) 1; *3)1!1$7; ' 6;
4; ;
;)&);
.!1.; ;3;
: ;%*1; ;4;
: ;%*1; ;4; ;
:;%*1; ;4;
% / :;%*1; ;4; ;
;4;
'!'/ '"'/ ,- &;1*2%; ;3;
,/&(# /$/
, )* # H .$# # H
'H H ;$+; (.; ;!; ;!; (/; ;$+;
#/+ -/$/
;*'*;
, )* # H , )+ # H
.$# # H
-$# # H % /
./ / / /
$526;(3254; ; 274 ;
%)* /
Page 677
Page 678
EË MË MË BË QË CË
AË D ?>Ë SË EË
DP $
¯
3-Ë TT°Ë
DD"Ë |ÇË
!
±
-6Ë aË W[Vs
² D§ FË
{Ë @R"E>¸Ë
Ë `Ë k~XË
³ @> EË
Dª¡Ë ctË
?S SË
./Ë uT½Ë
>P PË H;PË
Ë bË k~¹Ë
³ >= PË Ê;PË
@¤¡Ë cu´Ë
Ë S"?o·Ë
.<-Ë uT½Ë
N =
eTTf^Ë
bk~lgË ctË
BË BË BË
>IË AFË
DP =Ë DP =Ë
12Ë TT°Ë
ËDD Ë |µqË º ! DD =Ë }µ£
9.Ë aË WZ¶Ë .<3Ë `Ë Y\»
! D="FË O· D¨"EË
.0Ë tT[Ë 64Ë wT]Ë
AS EË>¸ AS FË
Ë `Ë k~¹ Ë aË lY¹Ë
¾ A?"FË
A>"E>¸ D©¢Ë `w<¿#
?R À Ë>S À
:6Ë tT^Ë 66Ë wT_«Ë
¼Ë
>P "PË J· ?P"PË K·
Ë `Ë k~ Ë aË lX¹Ë
>= "PË J· Á ?=®"¬Ë ·Ë
A¥¢Ë bw«Ë
S ?Ë >;PË S >Ë ?;PË
52Ë vT½ 65Ë wT½
PË P$Ã
Page 679 Ë aË l Ë aË lXÄ%
$Ã
`k~lhË at alkiË `w¿Ë
DP$ÃË
&'''''
,'ÅÆ- <Æ6ÅTT°Ë
( +( DD"=Ë }Ç
p "
47Ë `Ë X]UrË
) ** D= GË NË;PË
m
66Ë wT½Ë
nË
yzË @S "FË ?¸Ë
Ë cË lXË
@? FË;@Ë
Dª¢Ë bwÈË
>S É
88 xT½
?P PË L;PË
Ë cË lY¹Ë
?= PË Ê;PË
@¦¢Ë dxÈË
S"> ?·
6.Ë wT½
P =Ë
Ë cË lY¹Ë
= =Ë
clkjË bwÈË
Page 680
-1hqi6kj .2
c X! [A]A[| c!X" \A^A[|
*78 *79
c ( ZRBz d X ZSBz
8 7 4x 8 7 4x
.pm IOUPaL IRXy .om IPUOaM JSXy
7*+'7 7 *+'7
f X YRBz e X YSBz
r)6kj
;<@ GC ITXX^{
,0
Page 681
/3} /3 )
f$X [B_B[Dfg f$X% [B_BY|
*7~ +7~
c#( \TBz c#( \TBz
s
:7 5x
: 7 5x
/pm IOUPbL ITX /pm JOVPbL ITX
uw *+x 7 *+x
c X ZRBcE c&X ZRBdF
t
) )
=>?l vaNHC KRXX`{
KQWn
Page 682
Page 683
9
*9 ,$
.*9 +%1 9 .*9 +%0 9
" 5
( 9 !%**-
.*9 +&.
.*9 +&0
9
*9 ,$
Page 684
.*9 +%2 9 .*9 +%0 9
( 9 !'**- ( 9 !%**-
$
/*9 +&/ 96
4
7
8) *39 # 9
$ ! " $ #
Page 685
Concrete Roof Tile
Decorative Wraught Iron Detail
Decorative Gable Pipes Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E Garage Door -
Windows See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
4 TYP
Perspective
25’-4 3/4”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 686
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4091 B
Stucco System
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
6 TYP
Perspective
26’-4 1/8”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 687
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4091 F
Stucco System
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
4 TYP
Perspective
25’-4 3/4”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 688
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4091 C
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Garage Door -
Windows
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Perspective
12 17’-0”
5 TYP
9’-1”
Page 689
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3534 A
Decorative Gable Concrete Roof Tile
Pipe Detail
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Accent Paint w/ Garage Door -
Special Stucco Finish See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
17’-0”
5 TYP
9’-1”
Page 690
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3534 B
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E Stucco System
Windows
Garage Door -
Standard Ledgestone Shown
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
12 17’-0”
5 TYP
12’- 10 1/8”
9’-1”
Page 691
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3534 C
Concrete Roof Tile
Board and Batton System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
Perspective
12 17’-0”
5 TYP
12’-1”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 692
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3534 F
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Standard Le dge s to ne Sho wn Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
17’-0”
5 TYP
10’-1”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 693
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3534 N
Concrete Roof Tile
Decorative Gable Pipes Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E Garage Door -
Windows See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Perspective
25’-6”
20’-7”
4 TYP
10’-1 1/8”
Page 694
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4093 B
Stucco System
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
27’-8”
6 TYP
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 695
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4093 F
Stucco System
Concrete Roof Tile
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
Perspective
25’-6”
20’-7”
4 TYP
10’-1 1/8”
Page 696
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4093 C
27’-3 1/4”
Perspective
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 697
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Concrete Roof Tile
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Decorative Wooden Shutters
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish Stucco System
Standard Ledgestone Shown
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
5 TYP
28’-9 1/2” Perspective
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 698
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4097 F
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Decorative Wooden Shutters
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Garage Door -
Standard Ledgestone Shown See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
4 TYP Perspective
27’-3 1/4”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 699
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4097 C
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Decorative Gable Pipe Detail
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
4 TYP
Perspective
26’-0 1/2”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 700
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4095 B
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E Garage Door -
Windows See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
6 TYP
28’-3 3/4” Perspective
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 701
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4095 F
Concrete Roof Tile Stucco System
Accent Paint w/
Dual Pane Low-E Special Stucco Finish
Windows
Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
4 TYP Perspective
25’-10 3/8”
20’-7”
10’-1 1/8”
Page 702
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 4095 C
Concrete Roof Tile Decorati e Wrought Iron Detail
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Decorative Wooden Shutters Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Perspective
12 16’-11 3/4”
5 TYP
11’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 703
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3507 A
Concrete Roof Tile
Decorative Gable Pipe
Dual Pane Low-E Stucco System
Windows
Accent Paint w/ Garage Door -
Special Stucco Finish See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
12 16’-11 3/4”
5 TYP
11’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 704
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3507 B
Stucco System
Concrete Roof Tile
Dual Pane Low-E Accent Paint w/
Windows Special Stucco Finish
Garage Door -
Optional Ledgestone Available See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
12 16’-11 3/4”
5 TYP
11’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 705
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3507 C
Concrete Roof Tile
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Decorative Wooden
Shutters Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
Perspective
12 17’-0”
5 TYP
12’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 706
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3507 F
Concrete Roof Tile
Dual Pane Low-E Stucco System
Windows Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Garage Door -
Optional Ledgestone Available See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
12 15’-5 1/8”
4 TYP
11’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 707
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3507 N
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Garage Door -
Windows
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Perspective
5 TYP 16’-11 1/2”
13’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 708
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3524 A
Decorative Gable Pipe Detail
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows
Accent Paint w/ Garage Door -
Special Stucco Finish See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
16’-11 1/2”
5 TYP
13’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 709
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3524 B
Concrete Roof Tile
Decorative Wrought Iron Detail
Accent Paint w/
Special Stucco Finish
Dual Pane Low-E Stucco System
Windows
Garage Door -
Standard Ledgestone Shown
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
16’-11 1/2”
5 TYP
13’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 710
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3524 C
Concrete Roof Tile
Board and Batton System
Dual Pane Low-E
Windows Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Standard Ledgestone Shown
Perspective
12 16’-11 1/2”
5 TYP
12’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 711
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3524 F
Concrete Roof Tile
Stucco System
Dual Pane Low-E Accent Paint w/
Windows Special Stucco Finish
Standard Ledgestone Shown Garage Door -
See Matrix for Actual Garage Door Style
Perspective
12 15’-6”
5 TYP
12’-1 1/8”
9’-1 1/8”
Page 712
0’-0”
Front Elevation Rear Elevation
Left Elevation Right Elevation
Plan 3524 N
From: Natalie Heylen
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Raining for stone butte east
Date: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:54:34 PM
What is the case number for this? I see lots of numbers everywhere.
Application number z-6-22
Dsd#21-5799
I want to make my feelings known I am not ok with this rezoning. What will happen to all the
hiking trails around here?
Page 713
From: Lauren Prole
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Stone Butte East - Concerns
Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 2:13:54 PM
Good afternoon Julianna,
I am a concerned resident of Desert Peak, just south of the proposed Stone Butte East project.
I wanted to reach out to you to find out how community concerns can be heard. We had a
neighborhood meeting with the developers of the project yesterday, but they did not provide
any specific responses to questions that were asked and many responses included pointed
towards the City of Phoenix.
One of my biggest issues is traffic, since the current infrastructure barely handles the traffic of
the residents that live here, adding 1,500 homes is concerning. Here are a couple examples:
-Cave Creek between Pinnacle and 51 freeway is congested almost all hours of the day.
-Excessive speed on Cave Creek as well as Desert Peak Parkway - I'm extremely concerned
for the children crossing Desert Peak Parkway with no clear pedestrian crosswalks.
-On Pinnacle/Desert Peak Parkway as traffic is heading west at the intersection of Cave Creek
Rd and Pinnacle there is already a huge problem with traffic backing up with no turn lane.
Are any of these issues going to be addressed with the planning of Stone Butte East? I
appreciate your time and look forward to your response.
Thank you,
Lauren Prole
Page 714
Anthony M Grande
From: Anthony M Grande
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 6:04 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: FW: Stone Butte East
From:M.J.Westfall
Sent:Tuesday,April5,20221:13PM
To:JuliannaPierre
Cc:ben@witheymorris.com
Subject:StoneButteEast
IamcontactingyoutorespectfullyrequestthatyoureconsidertherezoningrequestsforZͲ6Ͳ22Ͳ2,theproposedproject
ofStoneButteEast.
Outofconsiderationfortheexistingresidentsinthearea,Iamaskingthatyoupleaseconsidersignificantlyincreasing
theproposed40'landscapebufferbetweentheSheaneighborhood,NorthviewatStoneButte,andthewestsideof
phase1.Theresidentswhopurchasedhomesinthisare0qadidsofortheopenspaceandthesurroundingnatural
desert.Increasingthedistancebetweentheseresidentialcomplexeswillhelptomaintaintheopen,naturalfeelofthe
areaandhelptoprotecttheexistinghabitatsofthelocalwildlife.Ifeelthattheexistingplandoesnotproperly
accomodateforpreservingthenaturalaspectofthearea,theverythingthatmakesthislocationdesirabletoyour
futurepotentialbuyers.
Additionally,Iamrequestingthatyoupleasereconsidertherequestedzoningchangesforthemultifamilyresidential
units.TheareaisalreadygrosslyoverͲcongestedandcrammingmorepeopleintothisareaisirresponsibleconsidering
thatwedonothavetheroads,stores,etc.tosupportthegrowth.Furthermore,themultifamilyunitsbringan
undesirableelementthatwilllikelyimpacthomevalueswithboththenewbuildhomesandtheexistinghomes.
I'dbehappytodiscussfurtherandsincerlyhopethattheconcernsoftheexistingresidentswillbeconsidered.
BestRegards,
MelissaWestfall
619Ͳ518Ͳ5973
Page 715
Anthony M Grande
From: Niranjan Dravid
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2022 12:28 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Desert View Village Planning committee meeting - Stone butte East
HELLO Anthony,
We were told by some of our residents to contact you in order to get our objections for the public
meeting notice that is going to be help on May 3 (Village planning ) & June 2 (Planning rezoning) .
We want to strongly OBJECT to the proposal due to the below reasons
1. This will simply destroy the ecosystem of the animals living in this area & will put them in danger .
2. This proposal will put a direct impact on our home prices. The high density of homes is 6 times
more denser than the existing homes that are built in Stone butte.
3. The whole area will become a concrete jungle without any parks. There are no parks near Stone
butte at all, why can't the City consider to use and redevelop this land and built parks for the families
so that the kids and adults can enjoy walks, pickle ball, tennis, baseball . We strongly feel that
building so many homes is profitable for the builder and they will mint a lot of money, but what about
the general public who needs parks and recreations near this area ? Is anyone thinking about them ?
We also do not have grocery stores, Gym etc near by, use this land to develop that instead and not
allow using such a dense population of homes which will have a negative impacts on eco system,
prices & the existing families.
We OBJECT to this proposal and would appreciate if you can take our vote for objection,
Shea Homes resident
Page 716
Anthony M Grande
From: Smitha Kundur
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 2:49 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Reference to Stone Butte East, Case Nos Z-6--22 & GPS-DSTV-1-22
Attachments: Stone Butte.jpg
Hello Anthony,
I am a resident of the Desert Peak neighborhood located on the northwest corner of Pinnacle Peak Road and Cave Creek
Road.
I understand there is a zoning conversion hearing for Stone Butte East development as referenced above. We obtained
a proposed site plan (see attached) that shows 3 connections to the existing Desert Peak community. I am a resident
that lives adjacent to one of these connections and I am very concerned with the amount of traffic the new
development will add to our neighborhood. The way their site plan is laid out, most of the traffic from the houses
located along the southern property limits of Stone Butte will most likely access the existing Desert Peak community
adding a lot of traffic burden on our roadways.
I would also like to request any traffic study/circulation study the developer submitted as part of the zoning conversion
documents. I am a traffic engineer by profession and would like to see the amount of traffic the proposed community is
generating as a whole and how much of it will be accessing our neighborhood.
Thank you for your time. I can be reached at 479‐871‐4110 or via email if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Smitha.
Page 717
Anthony M Grande
From: Maruth Kumar Mulakala
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 11:25 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Ref Stone Butte East Case nos: Z-6-22 & GPA-DSTV-1-22
Hello Anthony,
I am a resident of the Desert Peak neighborhood located on the northwest corner of Pinnacle Peak Road and Cave Creek
Road.
I understand there is a zoning conversion hearing for Stone Butte East development as referenced above. We obtained
a proposed site plan (see attached) that shows 3 connections to the existing Desert Peak community. I am a resident
that lives adjacent to one of these connections and I am very concerned with the amount of traffic the new
development will add to our neighborhood. The way their site plan is laid out, most of the traffic from the houses
located along the southern property limits of Stone Butte will most likely access the existing Desert Peak community
adding a lot of traffic burden on our roadways.
Thank you for your time. I can be reached at 480 677 0026 or via email if you have any questions.
Please let me know if there is anything we can do to avoid such an intrusive plan.
Thanks
Maruth Mulakala
Page 718
Anthony M Grande
From: Anunori
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 12:51 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Stone Butte East - Cases No Z-6-22 & GPA-DSTV-1-22
Hello Anthony,
I am a resident of the Desert Peak neighborhood located on the northwest corner of Pinnacle Peak Road and Cave Creek
Road.
I understand there is a zoning conversion hearing for Stone Butte East development as referenced above. We obtained
a proposed site plan that shows 3 connections to the existing Desert Peak community. I am a resident that lives
adjacent to one of these connections and I am very concerned with the amount of traffic the new development will add
to our neighborhood. The way their site plan is laid out, most of the traffic from the houses located along the southern
property limits of Stone Butte will most likely access the existing Desert Peak community adding a lot of traffic burden
on our roadways.
This is a concern for us.
Thank you for your time and listening to us.
Regards,
Anuradha
Page 719
Anthony M Grande
From: Lalitha K
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 1:41 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Regarding zoning for Desert View village
Attachments: 2c7ca7fa-031c-4515-89b0-96e09fee80a4.jpg
Hello Anthony,
I am a resident of the Desert Peak neighborhood located on the northwest corner of Desert Peak Road and Cave Creek
Road.
I understand there is a zoning conversion hearing for Stone Butte East development as referenced above. We obtained
a proposed site plan (see attached) that shows 3 connections to the existing Desert Peak community. I am a resident
that lives adjacent to one of these connections and I am very concerned with the amount of traffic the new
development will add to our neighborhood. The way their site plan is laid out, most of the traffic from the houses
located along the southern property limits of Stone Butte will most southern property limits of Stone Butte will most
likely access the existing Desert Peak community adding a lot of traffic burden on our roadways.
We are already impacted by Stone Butt west and North View Shea construction and with hazardous traffic conditions.
Thank you for your time. I can be reached at 305 798 2625 or via email if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Lalitha
Page 720
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-6-22-2
Date of VPC Meeting May 3, 2022
Request From S-1
Request To R1-10, R-2, and R-3A
Proposed Use Single-family and multifamily residential
Location Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest
corner of Cave Creek Road and Jomax Road
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 6-3
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 and Z-6-22-2 were heard concurrently.
One request to speak in favor and nine requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Anthony Grande, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases GPA-
DSTV-1-22-2 and Z-6-22-2. Mr. Grande provided an overview of the location of the
request and summarized the General Plan Land Use Map designation and proposed
amendment, noting that staff recommends approval of the GPA. He described the
surrounding land uses and zoning, the proposed zoning districts, and the proposed
development, noting the unit counts in each portion and certain aspects of the open
space and trails to be provided. He summarized the community input and the staff
findings, noting that the staff recommends approval of the rezoning with stipulations.
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the setback from Cave Creek Road. Mr. Grande
replied that it is 140 feet from the property line, which would be 205 feet from the
centerline of the street.
Benjamin Tate, representative with Withey Morris, summarized the history of the
property, existing zoning, and surrounding land uses. He described the details of the
proposal, including the housing product types, network of proposed trails, the hillside
dedication to the city, the maintenance of the existing wash as a natural resource, and
the landscaping and shade aspects of the proposal. He described the existing densities
in the surrounding area, which he stated are comparable to the density of the
200 West Washington Street, 3 rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 721
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-6-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 2
applicant’s proposed development. He described the transportation aspects of the
project, including dedicating right-of-way for Cave Creek Road, a new traffic signal at
the intersection with Cave Creek Road, and the connections with the existing stub
streets.
Committee Questions
Chair Bowser asked whether the lots on the western edge are hillside lots. Mr. Tate
replied that there would be no hillside lots in the development.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he believes the proposal fits with the surrounding area,
but that he is concerned with the lots directly adjacent to the existing R1-18 zoning
district. Mr. Tate stated that the site plan concentrates a significant amount of open
space along that edge of the development to create a buffer and that the development
has an appropriate density gradient.
Committee Member Powell asked if the developer would be widening Cave Creek
Road to three southbound lanes and if there would be a change to the northbound
lanes. Mr. Tate replied that the developer would be widening the southbound side to
three lanes, but that the northbound lanes would be up to a future developer on the east
side of Cave Creek Road.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the stipulated bus stop and if there was bus
service along Cave Creek Road today. Mr. Tate replied that he didn’t believe there was
existing bus service on that corridor but that it is likely stipulated because of the
potential for future service.
Committee Member Hankins asked about the dam to the north of the project and the
remote-control air strip on the other side of the dam. Chair Bowser noted that the
question about the dam was not a land use issue. Mr. Tate replied that the remote-
control air strip doesn’t require notification, but that they would disclose the existence of
the air strip to future residents. Chair Bowser agreed that it is better to disclose it.
Mr. Powell asked if the apartments would have electric vehicle charging stations
installed. Mr. Tate stated that they would be provided, as this is now considered an
expectation in luxury buildings.
Committee Member Israel asked about the community outreach conducted. Mr. Tate
replied that they had conducted the required notifications and neighborhood meetings
and had individual conversations with neighbors to address concerns.
Mr. Israel asked if the 3-story buildings would have elevators and what the cost for
electric vehicle charging would be. Mr. Tate replied that the buildings would be walk-ups
and that the electric vehicle charging cost to the tenants is minimal and only covers the
cost of the electricity, not generating profit for the developer.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 722
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-6-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 3
Mr. Nowell asked about the density when the hillside area is subtracted from the
calculation. Mr. Tate replied that it would be 4.25 units per acre. Mr. Nowell followed up
by asking if it made more sense to be less dense closer to the preserve. Mr. Tate
agreed and stated that the development provides its largest lots and lowest densities
along the edge of the preserve, creating a desirable density gradient between the
eastern and western edges of the property.
Public Comments
Denny Hasenbank introduced himself and stated that he had moved to the
neighborhood because of the larger lots and that 80 percent of the residents are
opposed to the development. He stated that the development economics doesn’t work
out without the apartment component and that he is concerned about the minimal
architectural styling and the effect of the development on surrounding property values.
Robert Funk introduced himself and stated that adding 400 rental units is a problem, as
it would result in over 1,000 people living there. He stated that residents of this area
want single-family housing, noting that residents have made comments about
infrastructure and schools. He stated he wants to enjoy the lower density of the area.
Jeff Karau introduced himself and stated that he was concerned about the connecting
streets, which require a half-mile drive within the existing subdivision. He stated that he
suggests removing the stub street connections. He further stated that there are no
three-story buildings along this stretch of Cave Creek Road and that he believes the
height is a problem.
William Langdon introduced himself and asked about floodplain issues and stated
concerns about traffic on Hillstone Way. He asked whether a new development would
be on the adjacent hillside area. He stated that traffic on Cave Creek Road is a problem
and that there is too much density in the area. He further stated concerns about
schools.
Joe Abrahamson introduced himself and stated that the density is getting too high in
this area. He stated that he didn’t move to this area to have apartments nearby and that
they didn’t need those types of buildings in this area.
Marcy Mevorach introduced herself and stated that the population is growing and
Phoenix needs to accommodate the growth with new development. She stated that the
existing communities also had to clear vacant land, noting that eventually every piece of
land will be developed. She stated that she believes the developer is proposing a good
product.
Mead Summer introduced himself and stated that the community had argued against
the three-story request for the other multifamily development in this area and the
committee agreed to limit it to two stories. He stated that Cave Creek Road has a lot of
traffic and it’s not safe to add more, further stating concern about the stub street
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 723
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-6-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 4
connections to the existing subdivision.
Lauren Prole introduced herself and stated that she is concerned about the density of
the proposal and that Desert Peak Parkway already has a lot of traffic. She stated that
the roads are getting busier and unsafe for children. She stated that she believes
schools are an issue as well.
Brian Wilson introduced himself and stated he was concerned with the connections to
the stub streets into the existing subdivision, which doesn’t add value to the existing
residents since the new development would be gated. He stated that it would be an
expense to the existing community to take down fencing.
Z. Prole introduced himself and stated that he is concerned about the traffic generated
from the proposed project.
Chair Bowser stated that it was important to note the correct information about the
schools in the area and that the schools are under capacity.
Applicant Response
Benjamin Tate stated that the development is driven by what the General Plan calls for,
not simply economics. He stated that the connection to the stub streets is not driven by
the developer, rather by requirements of the Street Transportation Department, and that
the applicant would work with the City to see if they can make the connections
emergency only. He stated the development team had a meeting with the school
superintendent to discuss school needs and that there was no need for a new school
since the school are not at capacity. He stated that the vast majority of the traffic from
the site will be southbound and that the multifamily buildings will be over a mile from any
of the homes in the existing subdivision, where neighbors have concerns.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that the committee tries to keep the zoning similar to the
surrounding area and that the proposal fits. He stated that adding people will drive
demand for new commercial uses and that he understood the desire to limit the
development to two stories.
Chair Bowser stated that the grade of Cave Creek Road is another factor to consider.
MOTION – Z-6-22-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to recommend approval of Z-6-22-2 per the staff
recommendation. Committee Member Santoro seconded the motion.
VOTE
6-3, motion to recommend approval per staff recommendation passed; Members Dean,
Hankins, Powell, Santoro, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Members Israel, Nowell and
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 724
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-6-22-2
May 3, 2022
Page 5
Reynolds against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 725
Attachment D
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
June 2, 2022
ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-6-22-2 (Companion Case GPA-DSTV-1-22-2)
Location: Approximately 2,400 feet southwest of the southwest corner of Cave
Creek Road and Jomax Road
From: S-1
To: R1-10, R-2, and R-3A
Acreage: 417.33
Proposal: Single-family and multifamily residential
Applicant: DR Horton, Inc.
Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 5/3/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 6-3.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Desert View Village Planning
Committee recommendation, with modifications and an additional stipulation.
Motion Discussion:
The representative, Jason Morris, requested modifications to two stipulations and an addition of
a stipulation, as follows:
Stipulation 14: The developer shall connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane,
27th Place, and 29th Way, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022 but shall
be restricted to emergency access only, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department and Street Transportation Department. Additionally, the developer
shall provide pedestrian access at the above referenced street stubs to facilitate pedestrian
circulation between the development and the existing Desert Peak neighborhood.
Stipulation 31: The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development Department
and as modified by the stipulations below.
Stipulation 35: The development shall be limited to a maximum building height of two stories, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Motion details: Commissioner Perez made a MOTION to approve Z-6-22-2, per the Desert View
Village Planning Committee recommendation; with the modifications to Stipulation Nos. 14 and
31, and the additional stipulation, per the applicant’s request.
Page 726
Maker: Perez
Second: Simon
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Howard and Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The requested R1-10, R-2, and R-3A zoning districts produce an overall density and
development pattern that is consistent with the character of the surrounding area.
2. As stipulated, the proposed development appropriately shifts density away from
sensitive natural resources and closer to the major arterial of Cave Creek Road and
provides design elements that protect the surrounding natural and built environment.
3. As stipulated, the proposed development enhances connectivity in the immediate
vicinity, including multi-modal transportation options with shade elements, and
improves public access to the adjacent natural resources.
Stipulations:
OVERALL SITE
1. Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan approval, the landowner shall convey
approximately 74 acres (or an area mutually agreed upon by the city and the owner) of
hillside land selected by the City of Phoenix and located in the area depicted as
“Hillside Area” on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022, to the City of Phoenix
for the use as a City of Phoenix desert park and/or mountain preserve, as modified
and approved by the Planning and Development Department and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
2. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department to
determine a maximum of two access points to the desert park or mountain preserve
area prior to issuance of preliminary site plan approval. The access points shall be
made accessible to the public through a trail network, within and/or bounding the site,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department. In conjunction
with the electric utility provider, the developer shall also explore the possibility of
providing a public access parking lot in the utility easement area with access to the
preserve trail network.
3. A minimum landscaped setback of 140 feet shall be provided along the Cave Creek
Road frontage.
4. The required landscape setbacks along Cave Creek Road, Desert Peak Parkway, and
the perimeter setbacks for the R-2 and R-3A zoned portions of the site where adjacent
to single-family residential zoning shall be planted with a minimum of 70 percent 2-inch
caliper and 30 percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
5. Within the development and along Cave Creek Road and Desert Peak Parkway, all
pedestrian paths, multi-use trails, and sidewalks, excluding sidewalks along internal
streets, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at maturity, or a combination of
Page 727
the two to provide a minimum of 75 percent shade, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
6. The developer shall dedicate 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easements (MUTE) along the
east side of Desert Peak Parkway and the west side of Cave Creek Road and
construct a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the easements in
accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall
work with the Site Planning Section on an alternative design through the technical
appeal process.
7. The developer shall construct minimum 10-foot-wide community trails and multi-use
trails, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department. Where
conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with the Site Planning Section
on an alternative design through the technical appeal process.
8. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad along
southbound Cave Creek Road. The bus stop pad shall be constructed according to the
from the intersection of the main access point on Cave Creek Road according to City
of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department or the Public Transit Department.
9. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a
minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area between the back of curb and sidewalk along
Cave Creek Road, planted to the following standards and as approved or modified by
the Planning and Development Department or Street Transportation Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. The developer shall construct minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks with minimum
5-foot-wide landscape areas between the back of curb and sidewalks along the
primary roadway through the subdivision, as generally depicted on the Overall Trails
Exhibit, date stamped April 15, 2022, planted with minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees,
25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved or modified by the Planning
and Development Department. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work
with the Planning and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall dedicate 65 feet of right-of-way along Cave Creek Road, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. The developer shall construct a 24-foot-wide landscaped median island along Desert
Peak Parkway from Hillstone Way to 23rd Street, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
Page 728
13. The developer shall align the primary roadway through the subdivision with the
intersection of Desert Peak Parkway and Hillstone Way and shall be responsible for
any modifications to the existing drainage facility and access ramp, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
14. The developer shall connect to the existing stub streets of Rustling Oaks Lane, 27th
Place, and 29th Way, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February 4, 2022,
BUT SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY and as approved
or modified by the Planning and Development Department. ADDITIONALLY, THE
DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AT THE ABOVE
REFERENCED STREET STUBS TO FACILITATE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE EXISTING DESERT PEAK
NEIGHBORHOOD.
15. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study, including a Cave Creek Road
Traffic Corridor Analysis from Sonoran Desert Drive south to the 101 Freeway to
evaluate the overall level of service and corridor conditions with impacts associated
with the proposed 1,545 dwelling units. The developer shall be responsible for regional
mitigation identified through the analysis. No preliminary approval of plans shall be
granted until the study is reviewed and approved by the Street Transportation
Department.
16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
17. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix for
the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney prior to final site plan
approval.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed development
from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis review process,
prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the Planning and
'HYHORSPHQW'HSDUWPHQWௗ
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of the
property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the templates
and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney.
20. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall conduct
Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the development
area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing and grubbing,
landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
21. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I data
testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, determines
such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II
archeological data recovery excavations.
22. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
Page 729
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.
23. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.
R1-10 ZONED AREA
24. Building elevations shall depict architectural detailing applied to windows on all sides
of the homes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
25. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area for the R1-10 zoned portion of the site,
after dedication of the hillside area to the city, shall be retained as open space,
including washes and internal hillside areas, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. This requirement shall not be applied to individual phases
of the overall development.
26. A minimum of two distinct active open space areas and a minimum of three passive
open space areas shall be provided within the overall R1-10 zoned area, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
R-2 ZONED AREA
27. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations date
stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
28. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
29. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as but not
limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground equipment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
30. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks shall
be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the
clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
R-3A ZONED AREA
31. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations date
stamped February 4, 2022, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department AND AS MODIFIED BY THE STIPULATIONS BELOW.
32. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
including washes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 730
33. There shall be a minimum of 5 amenities within the open space areas, such as but not
limited to benches, picnic tables, ramadas, and/or playground equipment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
34. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks shall
be provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the
clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
35. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF
TWO STORIES, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 731
Attachment E
Anthony M Grande
From: Tom Bonanno
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 7:40 PM
To: Anthony M Grande; Tom Bonanno
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)…
Hi Anthony,
I live immediately West of the proposed new Development. I understand the Village planning committee is asked to
amend the current DR Horton rezoning application to approve an additional 400 rental units on approximately 20
acres. Those 400 units allow over 1,000 people to be living in those units. This zoning request which should never be
approved. Please take the time to drive around the area as see how it is all singe‐family homes. Everyone of us wants to
remain that way. VOTE NO on the amendment.
Thank you,
Tom Bonanno
M: 602.743.9200
Page 732
Anthony M Grande
From: Sarah Crank
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 9:14 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA-DSTV-e-22-2 amendment. As a resident of this area I strongly object to the addition of 400
rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional 1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the
neighborhood. My community is less than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the value,
the character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly object to the committee
approving 400 rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Stone Butte Homeowner
Sarah Crank
sarahcrank@me.com
480.236.6232
Page 733
Anthony M Grande
From: Robert Funk
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:27 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case Z-6-22-2
Dear Anthony,
II want to go on record as strongly objecting to the proposed amendment for 400 Rental Units. A year ago my family
purchased a house in Stone Butte North that was developed by D R Horton with zoning for 1.9 houses per acre. The
zoning application next to us by the same developer will be more than double my density.
D R Hortons Rezoning Application (Case Z‐4‐6‐22‐2) is more than dense enough for this area with out adding 400 rental
units onto it. If you approve this amendment the Village Planning Committee you will not be serving the best interests
of the neighboring developments.
Please VOTE NO.
Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows
Page 734
Anthony M Grande
From: Bruce Gross
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:23 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: Bruce Gross
Subject: RE: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 Hearing
Dear Anthony,
I'm Bruce Gross and my single-family house is immediately to the west of this D R
Horton proposed development. I live in Desert Peak. I purchased my house and moved
in November 2017, to live in a nice neighborhood with the low density that my
community provides. It is also what the other communities are like around me.
I understand the Village planning committee is asked to amend the current D R Horton
rezoning application to approve an additional 400 rental units on approximately 20
acres. 400 units will allow over 1,000 people to be living in those units, plus D R Horton
want to also build a 2-story apartment complex.
Aside from destroying our “desert space” to walk-in, the impact on water and especially
getting on to Cave Creek, which is already like driving on a freeway, will make life here
in our community horrific. I hope you will consider denying this Amendment and
PLEASE VOTE NO.
Please think of our community as if you lived here as well.
Respectfully submitted,
Bruce Gross
Desert Peak owner
Bruce Gross
"Tell me and I forget.
Teach me and I remember.
Page 735
Involve me and I learn." Benjamin Franklin
Page 736
Anthony M Grande
From: Harold B. Jones, Jr.
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 11:41 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
I am writing in to express my opposition to the amendment of DR Horton’s application for the "Stone Butte East"
development.
I am not opposed to their original plan of 3 homes per acre, but now I hear they want to include 140
rental homes and a 260-unit apartment building which is entirely unacceptable to me. I bought my single
family home in Stone Butte believing we would see other single family homes in the future. That density
of rental homes and apartments simply do not belong in this area; we do not have the roadway capacity
nor the retail business to handle that additional population. I am convinced it will negatively affect my
quality of life, the quiet enjoyment of my home, and the valuation of my property.
Please, please do not approve their request for an amendment.
Best Regards,
Harold & Angie Jones
24218 N 22nd Street
Phoenix, AZ 85024
480-305-3328
Page 737
Anthony M Grande
From: N J
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 2:31 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Desert Peak VPC , D.R. Horton rezoning GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case Z-6-22-2)
Hello,
I live immediately west of the proposed new development by DR Horton on Desert Peak Parkway and Cave Creek Road.
I understand the village planning committee has been requested to amend the rezoning application to approve
additional rental units (D.R. Horton rezoning GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 ‐ Companion case Z‐6‐22‐2). This planned development
will significantly increase the traffic in the neighborhood and cause a lot of challenges.
DR Horton communities in Stoneview Butte North has a density of less than two houses per acre. I invested my hard‐
earned money in this neighborhood because of the low density. Now the same developer is requesting an amendment
to their rezoning application to add 400 rentals. This will more than double the density.
We strongly object to this rezoning request and recommend voting No to the amendment.
Regards
Nilesh Joshi
2108 E Chama Dr Phoenix AZ
Page 738
Anthony M Grande
From: Chris Smith
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 8:55 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA-DSTV-e-22-2 amendment. As a resident of this area I
strongly object to the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional
1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less
than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the
value, the character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density
neighborhood and strongly object to the committee approving 400 rental units in addition to the single
family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Chris Smith
Page 739
Anthony M Grande
From: William Wiltse
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 7:10 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
To Whom it May Concern,
We are relatively new homeowners in the Northview at Stone Butte neighborhood, directly west of the proposed
development referenced in case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2. I understand that the Village committee will be discussing a
proposed amendment that would allow for the building of 400 rental properties within the development. I purchased
my home in this area because of the large lot size and low density of homes. These rental units would not only have a
negative effect on nearby home values, it would also dramatically increase the amount of vehicular traffic on Cave Creek
Road. We have already noticed increased congestion in the short time since we have lived here and have concerns that
the rental units, in addition to all of the new single‐family homes, will cause this to become significantly worse.
These rental units were not part of the original neighborhood plan and should not be approved. Please consider the
impact on homeowners in the area and vote NO on this amendment.
Thank you for your consideration,
Bill & Angie Wiltse
2127 E Fallen Leaf Lane
Page 740
Anthony M Grande
From: joe@joea.com
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 6:31 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Developement hearing
I am very much opposed to this and would like to RTS for this meeting. This is just North of where I have lived for 22+
years.
Thanks,
Joe Abrahamson
Phoenix 85024
~~~~~
From: Sarah Crank
Date: April 30, 2022 at 9:13:02 AM MST
To: Bridgette Wilde
Subject: Village Planning Committee meeting *Action requested* - New Development by DR Horton
DR Horton is proposing a new "Stone Butte East" development which will be located between Northview and the Desert
Peak neighborhood to our east. They had originally applied for residential zoning permitting 3 homes per acre (our zoning
only allows for 1.95) but now they are looking to amend their application to include 140 rental homes and a 260-unit
apartment building which would increase that homes per acre significantly. There is an upcoming virtual meeting on May
3rd @ 6:30pm where neighbors can object to the amendment. If you would like to attend, comment, or speak at the
meeting, details can be found here: https://www.phoenix.gov/city.../PublicMeetings/220503004.pdf
Submit a comment on an agenda item:
Send your comments to: Anthony Grande at anthony.grande@phoenix.gov
By: 48 hours prior to start of the meeting - DEADLINE Sunday May1st 6:30 pm
Indicate Item Number and case number:
GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Page 741
Anthony M Grande
From: jbbrabender@comcast.net
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:46 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case 2-6-22-2)
Please vote no. The area should be zoned single family residential which is consistent with the surrounding
neighborhood. I am a home owner in the North View at Stone Butte community. Thank you.
Jim Brabender
Sent from my iPhone
Page 742
Anthony M Grande
From: adesmond1
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 3:48 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion case z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert Peak VPC,
We live immediately West of this proposed new Development. The additional 400 units would impose higher traffic
volume, a basis for lower demographics to enter the area, and the area is not prepared to manage this volume and type
of household/residences. As residences of the community we experience daily issues that arise and will change with a
higher volume of people, i.e. taking our child to school; Cave Creak Dam Rd is our most direct route to access the
elementary and middle school, and cannot we widened due to homes already built. This is also a route for people to
commute to Deer Valley Road for work. As is may be possible to eventually connect Pinnacle Peak Parkway to 7th
Street, this will significantly increase traffic into our neighborhood from surrounding areas to reach other areas like
Norterra Shopping or I‐17. Obviously with this we will now be hindered with widening of streets to allow for the traffic,
leading to intersections with lights, delaying leaving and entry into the community.
As an example this happened on Norterra Parkway and North Valley Parkway and 19th avenue where two upper scale
neighborhoods of Dynamite Mountain Ranch and Fireside were suddenly built up with apartments, lowering the
demographics and increasing traffic which resulted in an intersection with a signal, included widening the road, that led
to be a common detour for people needing to avoid I‐17, not to mention increasing accidents in the neighborhood
resulting in a pedestrian being killed in what used to be a quiet, family‐oriented, safe neighborhood.
Overall growth is good, as the community CAN safely grow, with different levels of demographics which lead to
commerce that can support the surrounding area, but at this point it is difficult to see how this can be achieved as the
beautiful desert area is quickly being consumed by multilevel housing projects. Part of our investment was closing to
live outside of town and the congestion, hence investing the large sum of money to reside in a gated community. This
proposal is poorly planned as limited commerce is currently available, roads are not developed, and quite simply it will
change the landscape of our community for families hiking and riding. Multifamily dwellings such as apartments and
condominiums lead to increased crime and lower value of all surrounding neighborhoods. Transitory residents will not
be invested in our community.
Lastly, speaking of investment, the desert preserve and surrounding desert areas is another reason why we selected this
area to invest in our residence and call this our home. Not to watch it be monopolized by while DR Horton who sold lots
as a premium to us, finished selling our community, only to now submit a proposal for a new cash cow as they consume
the environment surrounding our investment with temporary low end housing with the goal of putting as many people
as possible in as small of a space as possible to make the most money. If they could would they build 4 story units rather
than just 2? When does it end? When we no longer have any mountain view and it is all a parking lot?
So as one development builds it will set the tone for more to follow. Please help us protect our property values and the
surrounding area, in keeping this community a quiet, safe, family‐oriented, home‐valued neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Ron and Andrea Desmond
2028 E Chama Dr
Phoenix, AZ 85024
(602)332‐3210
Page 743
Anthony M Grande
From: Karen Harding
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:25 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Desert View GPA Case # GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 Rezoning Case No: Z-6-22-2
Dear Mr. Grande,
As a new property owner in Stone Butte I’m writing to voice my disapproval with the proposed re‐zoning. I love my new
neighborhood and enjoy the privacy.
The proposed re‐zoning development will cause an increase in traffic, add to the air pollution, air quality and bring
excess noise. I oppose the concentration of housing you want to create. I don’t understand the need to change the
original zoning that was previously approved. The schools are already overflowing with students especially Pinnacle
High School.
I believe the zoning of the property in question should remain as is and not be changed.
My husband, William Langdon, would like to speak at your meeting. Thank you for your attention to this important
matter.
Karen Harding
William Langdon
1942 E Robb Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Will’s cell phone: 602‐549‐3948
Karen’s cell phone: 602‐330‐3743
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad [overview.mail.yahoo.com]
Page 744
Anthony M Grande
From: Matthew Harmon
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 2:13 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: Tara Harmon
Subject: Note regarding case GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 amendment. As a resident of this area I strongly object to
the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex. This additional 1000+ residents would
significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less than 2 houses per acre currently and the
addition of this amendment would significantly change the value, the character and the quiet nature of the
neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly object to the committee approving 400
rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Matt Harmon
Stone Butte Homeowner
Matt Harmon, Dealer Marketing Consultant
General Motors CSSR – Western Region
Text / Mobile: 425-309-1229
epsilon.com [epsilon.com]
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Disclaimer The information in this email and any attachments may contain proprietary and confidential information that
is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, retention or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. When addressed to our clients or
vendors, any information contained in this e‐mail or any attachments is subject to the terms and conditions in any
governing contract. If you have received this e‐mail in error, please immediately contact the sender and delete the e‐
mail.
Page 745
Anthony M Grande
From: Jill Smith
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:37 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Opposition to GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View VPC,
I would like to voice strong opposition to the GPA‐DSTV‐e‐22‐2 amendment. As a resident of this area (Stone Butte
North) I strongly object to the addition of 400 rental units including a 2 story apartment complex.
This additional 1000+ residents would significantly change the landscape of the neighborhood. My community is less
than 2 houses per acre currently and the addition of this amendment would significantly change the value, the
character, and quiet nature of the neighborhood. I invested in this specific low density neighborhood and strongly
object to the committee approving 400 rental units in addition to the single family houses they want to build.
Please support the existing community members in voting NO to this amendment.
Thank you,
Jill Smith
Page 746
Anthony M Grande
From: Kamal Jagga <1.kamal.j@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 12:47 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Action Request: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2) - I Vote No!
Dear Desert Peak PVC,
I live immediately west of this proposed new development. We bought this property because of the low population
density, healthy and safe environment for the families. Building this additional units will impact negatively the peaceful
and serene environment of our area. We strongly object to the Committee approving 400 rental units.
GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 (Companion Case Z‐6‐22‐2) ‐ I VOTE NO!
Thank you for understanding!
Regards
Kamal JAGGA
‐‐
Regards,
Kamal Jagga
Page 747
Anthony M Grande
From: Greg Pelegrin
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 5:17 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Dear Desert View Village Planning Committee,
I am a home owner adjacent to the proposed Stone Butte East development and moved into the area due to the open
space and fact that our development is less than 2 homes per acre. D.R. Horton already has zoning to build up to 5
homes per acre which is very dense for the area so why would this even be a consideration for 15+ units per acre? This is
the far north suburbs of Phoenix and the lack of transit options and nearby businesses does not warrant apartment style
housing in the area.
The other consideration for such a large number of homes being built per acre is the stress on the local infrastructure.
There are only 2 access points into and out of the proposed new development and that would lead to very heavy traffic
on both Cave Creek Rd and Desert Peak Pkwy. Also, the extra demand on current sewer and water lines and the
electrical grid in the area with 1000+ extra people living in the new proposed development.
Finally, there is already a lack of large parks and play areas for the children in the area as well as schools near capacity.
Has the project added enough room for play areas for children and room to add an additional school as needed?
Please leave this area that is zoned for single family homes the way it is to prevent much of the crowding that is
becoming more prevalent in many of the new D.R. Horton developments already built or are in the process of being built
in the Phoenix Valley.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Greg and Jaime Pelegrin
Page 748
Anthony M Grande
From: Ruffulo, Wendy
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:27 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (companion case Z-6-22-2)
We just recently purchased a Shea home just west of this planned new development. This area is all single family homes
which is one of the reasons why we selected this development. Single family homes is what we thought may be
developed, not apartments. Please vote NO.
Thank you
Get Outlook for iOS [aka.ms]
Page 749
Anthony M Grande
From: Lukas Treffers
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2022 1:44 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Good afternoon Desert Peak VPC,
I am writing you today in regards to the proposed new Development by DR Horton which includes 400 rental units. This
community primarily consists of single family homes and is one of the main reasons we chose to move here. There is low
traffic, minimal noise, and limited light pollution. With this potential addition of 400 units all of that goes out the
window. There will be an increase in traffic (accidents), noise and light pollution. This zoning request should not be
considered, myself and my fellow neighbors and community are against this. VOTE NO on this amendment.
Thank you for your time.
‐ Lukas
Page 750
Anthony M Grande
From: Tommy Ford
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 8:08 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 (Companion Case Z-6-22-2)
Mr. Grande:
DR Horton did grading for the Northview Stone Butte several years ago and then Shea took over and started building new
homes. The 130 home gated community of Northview, is a quiet and removed area that we were drawn to almost 2 years
ago. We picked our lot, with delays it took over 1 1/2 years to finally close and move into our new home. Now almost a
month later, we are enjoying the quiet and simple life in our new community.
One of the primary reasons for buying in Northview, was the lack of traffic once you turn onto Pinnacle Peak and head
West. The area has nice homes built several years ago and only two condo complexes. We bought in Northview in part to
not live on a busy street, that would be more congested with both people, cars and noise. The area we live in is largely
homes, and is without rental apartments. Rental apartments will decrease the value of our new home, increase traffic and
congestion on Pinnacle Peak/Desert Peak, and bring a population of people who do not care about our homes and
values. We have nothing against people wanting, needing to live in apartments but they should be built in areas that
already have apartments/condos not in true residential neighborhoods.
We respectfully request to the Committee to not approve the 400 rental units, VOTE NO PLEASE.
Sincerely,
Tommy & Caroline Ford
2017 E Fallen Leaf Lane,
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Page 751
Anthony M Grande
From: Jes
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 1:40 PM
To: Anthony M Grande
Cc: jim.warning@phoenix.gov; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Stone Butte East (case nos Z-6-22 & GPA-DSTV-1-22)
To Whom it May Concern;
The upcoming plans for the development designated as "Stone Butte East" by DR Horton, creates multiple concerns for
existing residents in the neighboring areas. Desert Peak has maintained a family safe environment with low traffic,
unobstructed desert views, and a reasonable level of population. The addition of this monstrous development invades
the peacefulness that drew many of us to this area.
The following concerns exist for the majority of the current homeowners.
New construction will drive wildlife into our neighborhoods and backyards, creating dangers for our children, pets, and
ourselves.
Plans show through streets from our existing neighborhood roads and cul de sacs to the new neighborhoods, robbing us
of these areas and creating safety concerns.
The current traffic on Cave Creek is already difficult to navigate through without the addition of 4k plus new vehicles.
The plans call for a small area of Cave Creek to be widened, showing a futile attempt to appease the matter.
The continued growth of multi‐family residential areas is not something any of the current residents support.
Local schools are not equipped to support the massive spike in new residents.
Jessica White
Page 752
Racelle Escolar
From: J Karau
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 4:47 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Public comment for June 2 meeting case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Attachments: Jeff - Planning Commission Comments.docx
I am writing regarding case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 and companion case Z‐6‐22‐2. I have registered to speak but also wanted
to include a written comment with additional references. There is an old related case ( Z‐8‐04‐2 (PHO‐1‐15) ) from 2015
as well as a Google Maps link [google.com] to existing streets that dead‐ends just outside of our community.
Thanks,
Jeff
Page1 753
Racelle Escolar
From: Deanne Haverlock
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 11:24 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Re: Application Z-6-22-2 (Companion Case GPA-DSTV-1-22-2) #7
Sorry, wanted to be clear I oppose item #6 and 7 re: above application in my previous email.
Thanks!
Deanne Haverlock
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 2, 2022, at 9:56 AM, Deanne Haverlock
>
>
> Hello,
> I would like to submit comment on above agenda item for re‐zoning and oppose the proposal. I am a resident in the
area and believe it’s desirable to keep the trust land open for nature and wildlife and keep the possible building on it to
a minimum to preserve the the beauty of our area.
>
> Thanks for your consideration and time.
> Respectfully,
> Deanne Haverlock
> Sent from my iPhone
Page1 754
Rcvd 6/2/2022
Desert Peak Homeowners Association
A Non-Profit Corporation
pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov
Dear Planning Commission Members,
We are writing today as the board of directors of the Desert Peak HOA, a neighboring community of 641
homes to the South of the proposed DR Horton community of Stone Butte East. During the Desert View
Village Planning Committee meeting neither the voices of the neighboring communities nor past
decisions by the Planning Commission were given much consideration before rushing to approve the
zoning changes in favor of the new community. The proposed Stone Butte East community is for the
area of over 400 acres west of Cave Creek Road and south of Jomax Road (case #GPA-DSTV-1-22-2 and
companion case Z-6-22-2). We strongly oppose DR Horton’s rezoning application without additional
changes.
The Desert Peak HOA and our community residents have concerns with the changes to the character of
the area with the height of the new community and concerns of traffic mainly within our community but
also in the surrounding area.
The first concern is for the overall character of the area by adding such dense new construction. During
DR Horton’s presentation they stated that the new community is a “mirror image” and just like they
“unfolded the page of a book” of the existing communities to the south. That is FALSE! The existing
communities consist of one and two-story homes, condos and apartments which fit in with the density
of the homes in the surrounding area when they were built.
In this zoning proposal DR Horton is asking for three-story buildings along Cave Creek Rd. which would
change the character of the area and set a precedent for other new communities in the future. Today,
there are NO existing three-story buildings along Cave Creek Rd. north of the 101. The residents of
multiple surrounding neighborhoods, including Desert Peak, are strongly opposed to setting the
precedent for three-story buildings in this area.
Back in 2015 a similar case was brought before the Planning commission for consideration regarding a
new apartment community at the corner of Cave Creek and Pinnacle Peak. This former rezoning case
was also brought by the same builder and was similarly seeking to build three-story apartment buildings
along Cave Creek Road. That proposal was modified to allow only two-story apartments and we ask that
you do the same in this case. The prior case for Desert Peak & Cave creek apartment was Z-8-04-2
(PHO-1-15).
Our second concern is related to the connection of the streets in the new gated community with the
streets of Desert Peak. There are three streets that are proposed to be connected to the new
community, East Rustling Oaks Ln, North 27th Pl, and North 29th Way. DR Horton has agreed to
Page 755
pedestrian access between the communities which we agree with and already have fencing with
pedestrian access at ends of those streets to support.
The issues arise due to the fact that the new community is gated so there is a one-sided benefit for the
new Stone Butte community to having vehicular ingress/egress within our community. We believe the
goals of the Complete Street Policy are fulfilled by the pedestrian gates and adding one-way access from
a private, gated community will not provide any additional benefit. If vehicle gates are required, Desert
Peak would have to pay to remove that existing fencing and pedestrian access even though we receive
no benefit from the vehicular connection. Two of the proposed connecting streets (Rustling Oaks Ln and
27th Pl) are nearly ½ mile of driving through Desert Peak to get to either major road, Cave Creek Rd or
Desert Peak Pkwy and we do not wish for our community to act as a ½ mile driveway for Stone Butte
East. This plan would add additional traffic within Desert Peak, cost the Desert Peak HOA/community
and provide no benefit to the Desert Peak community.
We disputed the facts that DR Horton claimed that this MUST be done in accordance with policy from
the Street Transportation department, but the concern was dismissed. In fact, when DR Horton built
our community of Desert Peak, they did the same thing with an existing community to the south. In that
case 25th St. was left as a dead end and the area within Desert Peak is used as a common area park. The
children in both communities enjoy walking/biking through this area for school and connecting the
neighbors. This area is just to the north of N. 25th St. and E. Casitas Del Rio Dr. (Google Maps link). We
ask that the connecting streets be removed from the plan and allow the streets of Desert Peak to remain
unchanged.
Lastly, we have serious concerns about DR Horton’s traffic study and statements that the community
will only generate additional southbound traffic and shouldn’t be a concern with adding an additional
1500+ homes. There are several streets in the area which are in need of improvement to handle the
existing traffic and adding more homes will only make matters worse. One of the areas of concern are
the bridge north of E. Lone Cactus Dr where Cave Creek narrows to 2 lanes, causing backups to Rose
Garden during high traffic hours. The intersection of Cave Creek Rd. and Pinnacle Peak to the east is
also an area of concern. Heading westbound at this intersection there are frequent backups to the
National cemetery entrance because the left turn lane is limited and there is no right turn lane. While
we understand the approach of having developers improve the areas along those roads as they are built,
we’d like to see a plan to handle the additional traffic in existing areas.
Sincerely,
Desert Peak HOA Board of Directors
Brian Wilson, President Jeff Karau, Vice President
Bruce Gross, Treasurer Lauren Prole, Secretary
John Tishuck, Director Jessica Noto, Director
Dave Dahm, Director
Page 756
Racelle Escolar
From: Margaret Rehberg
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 1:57 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Stone butte east
Good Afternoon
We live in Desert Peak on Rustling Oaks Ln and will be greatly impacted by the travel to Stone Butte east. They must
install a road with their own access. We will become a heavy traveled parking lot and for what?
Page1 757
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Desert Drive Funding Policy (Resolution 22048)
Request City Council approval of a resolution to establish a funding policy for new
development to pay their fair share of future funding needed to construct
improvements in the Sonoran Desert Drive roadway corridor resulting from
development of vacant land.
Summary
The Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor (SDDC), generally consists of Sonoran Desert
Drive and Dove Valley Road between Paloma Parkway on the west and Cave
Creek Road on the east and bounded by the Sonoran Preserve further to the north
and south of this large development area. It is estimated that this area will have
approximately 11,000 new homes in the future and is all owned by the Arizona
State Land Department, except for the 480 acre Verdin Master Plan Residential
Community. The roadway corridor improvements necessary to serve this area are
estimated to be approximately $120,000,000. The roadway corridor represents a
major vehicle conduit that will connect this area with rapidly growing areas to the
east and west of this corridor. The existing roads within the SDDC are insufficient to
support additional traffic that will be generated from future new development in
north Phoenix. This resolution establishes a policy framework for the City of
Phoenix and new development to contribute toward the timely expansion and
ultimate completion of the SDDC road network and provides guidance on future
zoning entitlements and new development in areas that can be expected to impact
the SDDC road network.
Zoning case Z-62-18-2 (Verdin PUD) falls within the SDDC boundaries and is one
example of a development that this policy would impact. City staff and the Verdin
developer have agreed to the major deal points of a development agreement that
are consistent with this policy and will be brought to a future City Council meeting.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact from this resolution.
Page 758
Location
North Gateway and Desert View Villages
Council District: 2
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Alan Stephenson and Mario
Paniagua and the Planning and Development, and Street Transportation
departments.
Page 759
1:1\fHO
-3-
,(',
,.,
\
'
.. ,.,..,__�
�-.
•;,..-.:•'.
:: ':·:�_-"'.<
.1:.
':.a
....
1.-
1.c
' )(
w
I ...
I}} 0
...
:•' "O
"i:
·o
i'C
C
It::
I�
G)
'C
1:l\lHO
1:IVH0
- t7 -
1:IVH0
DRAFT
RESOLUTION #
A RESOLUTION ADDRESSING THE FUTURE FUNDING OF SONORAN DESERT DRIVE
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Phoenix seeks to identify future funding for the
construction of Sonoran Desert Drive through private development funding and joint city financing, and
WHEREAS, the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor is a critical piece of the northern transportation
network connecting the rapidly expanding northeast Phoenix with the northwest Phoenix region, and
WHEREAS, future development north of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal is expected to
accelerate the need to expand and build roadways in the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor, and
WHEREAS, the Council recognizes the non-expansion of the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor will
result in surrounding street network congestion, limit development opportunities, and limit community
access to the Sonoran Desert Preserve, and
WHEREAS, the Council recognizes initial estimates of $120 million (2019 dollars) for the
construction of Sonoran Desert Drive, excluding value of rights-of-way, are preliminary and require
further analysis, and
WHEREAS, completion of all segments of the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor roadway sections
and bridges are necessary to address the significant traffic volume attributed to the future
developments in the Sonoran Desert Drive study area, and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to obtain advance funding from a non-City entity to construct full
segments of the ultimate Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor needed to support future development, and
WHEREAS, identified funding will need to come from certain developments north of the Central
Arizona Project (CAP) Canal located within City limits.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as follows:
SECTION 1. Prior to issuing a preliminary site plan approval or construction permit,
all new development north of Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal within the City limit must:
1)Provide a Regional Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) quantifying their impact on the
Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor.
2) Identify private funding sources (such as development agreement with the City) to
pay for its proportional share of the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor construction costs.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is directed to deposit all private development funding
for the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor in a designated account. Funds collected by the City will be made
available to improve street segments at such time as the road can be fully or partially built as
determined by the City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department.
SECTION 3. Subject to the budget appropriation, the City will contribute up to
twenty-four (24) percent of the total project cost.
-1-
Resolution #
DRAFT
Page 760
DRAFT
SECTION 4. The Planning and Development and Street Transportation Department
staff must review and use appropriate mechanisms to ensure that new development
constructs and pays its appropriate share of the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor, based
on Street Transportation Department approved traffic impact analysis of street
infrastructure in the corridor, to ensure the acceptable level of service for the arterial
road network in the region. Mechanism to be used may include development of master
plans, phasing plans, and funding plans for Planned Unit Development (PUD), Planned
Community (PC) districts, and zoning stipulations.
SECTION 5. The City will support rezoning or general plan amendments for land
within the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor (Exhibit A) if a development agreement to
construct and/or fund the acceptable level of service, financing, and phasing of the
Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor street improvements are provided.
SECTION 6. For the area north of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal, not
including and south of Loop 101, and outside of the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor
(Exhibit B), the City will support rezoning or general plan amendment if the property
owner agrees to contribute its share of costs or improvements to the regional street
network based on the traffic impact generated by the new development.
-2-
Resolution #
DRAFT
Page 761
EXHIBIT A
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE
Resolution #
All of Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley Road between Cave Creek Road and North Valley Parkway.
Pictured alignment subject to change.
DRAFT -3- DRAFT Page 762
DRAFT
-4-
Resolution #
DRAFT
Page 763
Report
Request City Council approval of a resolution to establish a funding policy for new
development to pay their fair share of future funding needed to construct
improvements in the Sonoran Desert Drive roadway corridor resulting from
development of vacant land.
Summary
The Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor (SDDC), generally consists of Sonoran Desert
Drive and Dove Valley Road between Paloma Parkway on the west and Cave
Creek Road on the east and bounded by the Sonoran Preserve further to the north
and south of this large development area. It is estimated that this area will have
approximately 11,000 new homes in the future and is all owned by the Arizona
State Land Department, except for the 480 acre Verdin Master Plan Residential
Community. The roadway corridor improvements necessary to serve this area are
estimated to be approximately $120,000,000. The roadway corridor represents a
major vehicle conduit that will connect this area with rapidly growing areas to the
east and west of this corridor. The existing roads within the SDDC are insufficient to
support additional traffic that will be generated from future new development in
north Phoenix. This resolution establishes a policy framework for the City of
Phoenix and new development to contribute toward the timely expansion and
ultimate completion of the SDDC road network and provides guidance on future
zoning entitlements and new development in areas that can be expected to impact
the SDDC road network.
Zoning case Z-62-18-2 (Verdin PUD) falls within the SDDC boundaries and is one
example of a development that this policy would impact. City staff and the Verdin
developer have agreed to the major deal points of a development agreement that
are consistent with this policy and will be brought to a future City Council meeting.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact from this resolution.
Page 758
Location
North Gateway and Desert View Villages
Council District: 2
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Alan Stephenson and Mario
Paniagua and the Planning and Development, and Street Transportation
departments.
Page 759
1:1\fHO
-3-
,(',
,.,
\
'
.. ,.,..,__�
�-.
•;,..-.:•'.
:: ':·:�_-"'.<
.1:.
':.a
....
1.-
1.c
' )(
w
I ...
I}} 0
...
:•' "O
"i:
·o
i'C
C
It::
I�
G)
'C
1:l\lHO
1:IVH0
- t7 -
1:IVH0
DRAFT
RESOLUTION #
A RESOLUTION ADDRESSING THE FUTURE FUNDING OF SONORAN DESERT DRIVE
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Phoenix seeks to identify future funding for the
construction of Sonoran Desert Drive through private development funding and joint city financing, and
WHEREAS, the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor is a critical piece of the northern transportation
network connecting the rapidly expanding northeast Phoenix with the northwest Phoenix region, and
WHEREAS, future development north of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal is expected to
accelerate the need to expand and build roadways in the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor, and
WHEREAS, the Council recognizes the non-expansion of the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor will
result in surrounding street network congestion, limit development opportunities, and limit community
access to the Sonoran Desert Preserve, and
WHEREAS, the Council recognizes initial estimates of $120 million (2019 dollars) for the
construction of Sonoran Desert Drive, excluding value of rights-of-way, are preliminary and require
further analysis, and
WHEREAS, completion of all segments of the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor roadway sections
and bridges are necessary to address the significant traffic volume attributed to the future
developments in the Sonoran Desert Drive study area, and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to obtain advance funding from a non-City entity to construct full
segments of the ultimate Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor needed to support future development, and
WHEREAS, identified funding will need to come from certain developments north of the Central
Arizona Project (CAP) Canal located within City limits.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as follows:
SECTION 1. Prior to issuing a preliminary site plan approval or construction permit,
all new development north of Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal within the City limit must:
1)Provide a Regional Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) quantifying their impact on the
Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor.
2) Identify private funding sources (such as development agreement with the City) to
pay for its proportional share of the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor construction costs.
SECTION 2. The City Manager is directed to deposit all private development funding
for the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor in a designated account. Funds collected by the City will be made
available to improve street segments at such time as the road can be fully or partially built as
determined by the City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department.
SECTION 3. Subject to the budget appropriation, the City will contribute up to
twenty-four (24) percent of the total project cost.
-1-
Resolution #
DRAFT
Page 760
DRAFT
SECTION 4. The Planning and Development and Street Transportation Department
staff must review and use appropriate mechanisms to ensure that new development
constructs and pays its appropriate share of the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor, based
on Street Transportation Department approved traffic impact analysis of street
infrastructure in the corridor, to ensure the acceptable level of service for the arterial
road network in the region. Mechanism to be used may include development of master
plans, phasing plans, and funding plans for Planned Unit Development (PUD), Planned
Community (PC) districts, and zoning stipulations.
SECTION 5. The City will support rezoning or general plan amendments for land
within the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor (Exhibit A) if a development agreement to
construct and/or fund the acceptable level of service, financing, and phasing of the
Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor street improvements are provided.
SECTION 6. For the area north of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal, not
including and south of Loop 101, and outside of the Sonoran Desert Drive Corridor
(Exhibit B), the City will support rezoning or general plan amendment if the property
owner agrees to contribute its share of costs or improvements to the regional street
network based on the traffic impact generated by the new development.
-2-
Resolution #
DRAFT
Page 761
EXHIBIT A
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE
Resolution #
All of Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley Road between Cave Creek Road and North Valley Parkway.
Pictured alignment subject to change.
DRAFT -3- DRAFT Page 762
DRAFT
-4-
Resolution #
DRAFT
Page 763
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(CONTINUED FROM JUNE 1, 2022) - Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption -
General Plan Amendment GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 - Southwest Corner of the 24th
Street Alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive (Resolution 22030)
Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation on 474.37
acres from Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, and Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves /
Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. This is a companion
case to Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 and must be heard first, followed by Z-
75-18-2.
Summary
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Current Designation: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2 to
3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres), and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37
acres)
Proposed Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre (451.13 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres), and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
(474.37 acres)
Acreage: 474.37 acres
Proposed Use: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and remove the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay to allow single-family residential development.
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Dec. 7,
Page 764
2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this
case on Dec. 9, 2021, for information only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022 and recommended approval, by a vote of 4-1. The Desert View Village
Planning Committee heard this case on April 5, 2022 and recommended denial as
filed, approval with a modification, by a vote of 10-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022 and
recommended approval, per Addendum A of the Staff Analysis Report, by a vote of 7-
1.
Location
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive.
Council District: 2
Parcel Addresses: 28239 N. 23rd St.; and 28231, 28235, 28241, and 28245 N. 24th St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 765
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION _____
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
2015 GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, CHANGING THE LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN.
____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan which was adopted by
Resolution No. 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-DSTV-1-18-2. The
474.37-acre site located at the southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive is designated 451.13 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units
per acre and 23.24 acres of Preserves / Floodplain, with the removal of 474.37 acres
of Infrastructure Phasing Overlay.
SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as
shown below:
Page 766
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Page 767
Attachment B
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
March 9, 2022
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham,
PLC
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Acreage: 474.37 acres
Current Plan Designation: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units
per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres),
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
(451.13 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24
acres), Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
(474.37 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and
remove the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay to
allow single-family residential development
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Page 768
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Staff Recommendation: Approval
FINDINGS:
1) The companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, incorporates development
standards that will provide transition between the subject site and surrounding
Sonoran Preserve and open space areas.
2) The request will allow for single-family residential development at 3 dwelling
units per acre, as proposed by the companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2. The
proposed development will provide a maximum of 1,420 single-family units,
which supports the City’s need for additional housing.
3) The parcel is one of the last privately owned properties in the area and as
recommended by the North Black Canyon Corridor Plan, property owners who
want to rezone a site within the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay area can file a
General Plan Amendment to remove the overlay designation from their
property.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is located approximately at the southwest corner of the 24th Street
alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive. The site is vacant and single-family residential
is currently permitted on the site. The site is currently zoned S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence),
and RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family
Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District), which permits
approximately 1 dwelling unit per acre.
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 proposes a minor
amendment to the General Plan Land
Use Map to allow single-family residential
development. The proposal will modify
the land use designation to Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential
3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and
Preserves / Floodplain. The companion
rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, proposes a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Aerial Map, Source: Gammage &
allow single-family development, not to Burnham
exceed a maximum of 1,420 dwelling
Page 769
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
units at an overall density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. The proposed PUD
Development Narrative includes development, landscaping, and design standards that
exceed Zoning Ordinance standards and provide appropriate edge treatments for the
adjacent preserve areas.
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was
adopted in 1987 as an amendment to the
General Plan and provided direction
regarding land use planning within the
area bounded by Carefree Highway to the
north, the City of Scottsdale to the east,
the Central Arizona Project Canal and
Jomax Road to the south, and 67th
Avenue to the west. This alignment
bisected what is now known as the Verdin
property.
The plan identified the Northeast Outer
Loop freeway alignment, now known as Peripheral Areas C and D Plan Map,
the Sonoran Desert Drive alignment, was Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
intended to connect Interstate 17 with Development Department
Dynamite Boulevard alignment. The
alignment also acted as a dividing line
between lower density uses to the north
and higher density to the south.
In 2002 the City of Phoenix initiated the Sonoran Preserve Parkway Route Location
Study to determine an efficient east-west transportation corridor that would replace
the Northeast Outer Loop freeway. In 2004, the City amended the Street
Classification Map via GPA-CTYW-1-04, which realigned Sonoran Desert Drive to its
current alignment.
Page 770
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
The Infrastructure Limit Line and
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay were
adopted as part of the North Black
Canyon Corridor Plan. The Infrastructure
Limit Line acted as a guide to where the
sewer infrastructure to support
development. The Infrastructure Phasing
Overlay was intended to act as a timing
element to ensure infrastructure
supported growth was concentrated
within the Infrastructure Limit Line. Since
the plan’s adoption in 1999, significant
private investment and development has
Infrastructure Limit Line and Infrastructure
occurred within these boundaries,
Phasing Overlay Map, Source: City of
resulting in housing, commercial, and
Phoenix Planning and Development
employment uses within the North
Department
Gateway Village Core. With this
development water and sewer
infrastructure has also been installed in this area.
The North Black Canyon Corridor Plan also indicates that the City would not extend
infrastructure beyond the Infrastructure Limit Line until the growth corridor was
expanded or removed. The plan recommends that property owners who want to
rezone properties within the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay area can file a General
Plan Amendment to remove the overlay designation from their property. The
applicant’s request to remove the property from the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay will
allow for residential development on one of the only privately owned properties within
the overlay. Additionally, since most water and sewer infrastructure has been built
with the Infrastructure Limit Line, this provides an opportunity to revisit the overlay on
a case-by-case basis and reassess development beyond the limit line boundaries.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
The current General Plan Land Use Map designations for the site are Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre
(138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential
3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres),
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres).
Page 771
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
EXISTING PROPOSED
Existing and Proposed General Land Use Designation Maps, Source: City of Phoenix
Planning and Development Department
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 proposes to change the Land Use Map designations to Residential
2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. The
request will retain the Preserves / Floodplain designation on the southeast portion of
the site. The remaining portion of the site will have the Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre designation to accommodate the
proposed 1,420 single-family units. Staff is supportive of the request to remove the
Preserve designation because this is consistent with the private property owner’s
intent to develop the land at 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
NORTH
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is Sonoran Desert Drive and the
Sonoran Preserve. Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a major arterial roadway
and is an important east-west alignment between Interstate 17 and northeast Phoenix.
This roadway alignment is proposed to have a total of six lanes, three in each
Page 772
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
direction. The Sonoran Preserve consists of over 9,600 acres of relatively
undisturbed natural areas in North Phoenix with various trail connectivity throughout.
Additionally, this area is owned by the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD). This
area is designated Future Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre.
EAST
East of the subject site is Cave Creek Wash and its associated floodplain. The
floodplain also encroaches onto the southeast portion of the subject site. This area
directly east of the subject site is designated Preserves/Floodplain.
SOUTH
South of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation Area
designated as Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre and Publicly Owned Parks/Open Space. The Cave Buttes
Recreation Area is a park that overseen by the Maricopa County Flood Control
District. This area contains a number of dams that control flooding from washes in the
general area. The PUD development narrative for the companion Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18-2 contains standards which will provide open edge treatments adjacent to the
preserve and trail connection.
WEST
West of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve designated Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space and open space owned by the ASLD designated Future
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre.
RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE
• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels
of increased intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 will allow for a designation of Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre on the majority of
the site. As proposed in companion case, Z-62-19-2, the site will develop at
3.0 dwelling units per acre, incorporate open edge treatments, incorporate
various open space areas, and provide connectivity to the surrounding Sonoran
Preserve areas.
Page 773
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS
• DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of
housing types and densities where appropriate within each village that
support a broad range of lifestyles.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment and concurrent
rezoning case will allow for single-family residential development options
adjacent to a major arterial street and in close proximity to the North Gateway
Core and Cave Creek Road. Additionally, the various lot sizes and single-
family housing products proposed in the companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2,
will support a range of lifestyles for Phoenix residents.
• CERTAINTY & CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Require appropriate
transitions/buffers between neighborhoods and adjacent uses.
The uses adjacent to the subject site are Cave Creek Wash, the Sonoran
Preserve, and various open space opportunities. As proposed in the
companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, the development will provide open edge
treatments to provide a natural transition between the single-family
development and the adjacent open space.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, as Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain,
and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal.
This General Plan Amendment request and concurrent case Z-62-18-2 will allow
single-family residential development, not to exceed 1,420 units. Staff supports
removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay and designation change to Residential
2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, to allow
development at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. Additionally, where the
floodplain encroaches onto the site, the Preserves / Floodplain designation will be
retained. The request will align with a land use designation that is respectful of the
adjacent Sonoran Preserve, while also being adjacent to a major arterial.
Writer
Julianna Pierre
March 9, 2022
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Page 774
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Page 775
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du/ac
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 776
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2_BW ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/acre
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du
E E E E E
Preserves / 0-1 or 1-2 du/ acre
Preserves / 2-3.5 or 3.5-5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 777
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, Item #5
– Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 778
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 779
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, Item #5
– Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 780
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 781
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 782
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 783
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 / Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, and
Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Z-TA-5-18-2, Item #5 – Z-75-18-2, and
Item #7 – Z-62-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 784
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 785
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 786
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Daniel Tome made a motion to approve GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2. The motion was seconded by Committee member Michelle Ricart.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 787
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 / Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, and
Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Denial as filed, approved with a modification
VPC Vote 10-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 788
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 789
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 790
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 791
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to deny GPA-GSTV-1-18-2 as filed, and approve
with the Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre designation removed. Committee
Member Santoro seconded the motion.
VOTE
10-1, motion to deny as filed, approve as modified, passed; Members Dean, Hankins,
Israel, Kollar, Nowell, Reynolds, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor;
Member Powell against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 792
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
STAFF ANALYSIS
April 26, 2022
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham,
PLC
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Acreage: 474.37 acres
Current Plan Designation: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units
per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres),
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
(451.13 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24
acres), Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
(474.37 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and
remove the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay to
allow single-family residential development
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Page 793
Addendum A to the Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
April 26, 2022
Staff Recommendation: Approval, per Addendum A
Summary
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended approval by a 4-1 vote. The Desert View VPC heard this
request on April 5, 2022, and recommended denial as filed, approval with a modification
to remove the Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre designation.
The applicant’s original request was for 451.13 acres of the subject site to be
designated as Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre/Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, along with other requested designations. The applicant proposes to
modify their request to remove the Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
designation, per the Desert View Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Updated sketch maps are attached to reflect this change.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 per Addendum A.
Exhibits
Sketch Map (2 pages)
Page 794
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc. 4/14/2022
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du/ac
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 795
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2_BW ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc. 4/14/2022
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/acre
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du
E E E E E
Preserves / 0-1 or 1-2 du/ acre
Preserves / 2-3.5 or 3.5-5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 796
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 5
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-
18-2)
Request: Map Amendment
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive
From: Preserves/Residential 0 to 1/Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves/Residential 2 to 3.5/Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
and Preserves/Floodplain; and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
To: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves/Floodplain, and
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
Acreage: 474.37
Proposal: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and remove the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay to allow single-family residential development.
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval. Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Denied as filed, approved with modifications. Vote: 10-1.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per Addendum A of the Staff Analysis
Report.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, per
Addendum A of the Staff Analysis Report.
Maker: Simon
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, incorporates development
standards that will provide transition between the subject site and surrounding
Sonoran Preserve and open space areas.
Page 797
2. The request will allow for single-family residential development at 3 dwelling
units per acre, as proposed by the companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2. The
proposed development will provide a maximum of 1,420 single-family units,
which supports the City’s need for additional housing.
3. The parcel is one of the last privately owned properties in the area and as
recommended by the North Black Canyon Corridor Plan, property owners who
want to rezone a site within the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay area can file a
General Plan Amendment to remove the overlay designation from their
property.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 798
Page 799
Page 800
Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 - Southwest Corner of the 24th
Street Alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive (Resolution 22030)
Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation on 474.37
acres from Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, and Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves /
Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. This is a companion
case to Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 and must be heard first, followed by Z-
75-18-2.
Summary
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Current Designation: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2 to
3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres), and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37
acres)
Proposed Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre (451.13 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres), and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
(474.37 acres)
Acreage: 474.37 acres
Proposed Use: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and remove the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay to allow single-family residential development.
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Dec. 7,
Page 764
2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this
case on Dec. 9, 2021, for information only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022 and recommended approval, by a vote of 4-1. The Desert View Village
Planning Committee heard this case on April 5, 2022 and recommended denial as
filed, approval with a modification, by a vote of 10-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022 and
recommended approval, per Addendum A of the Staff Analysis Report, by a vote of 7-
1.
Location
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive.
Council District: 2
Parcel Addresses: 28239 N. 23rd St.; and 28231, 28235, 28241, and 28245 N. 24th St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 765
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION _____
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
2015 GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, CHANGING THE LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN.
____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan which was adopted by
Resolution No. 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-DSTV-1-18-2. The
474.37-acre site located at the southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive is designated 451.13 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units
per acre and 23.24 acres of Preserves / Floodplain, with the removal of 474.37 acres
of Infrastructure Phasing Overlay.
SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as
shown below:
Page 766
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Page 767
Attachment B
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
March 9, 2022
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham,
PLC
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Acreage: 474.37 acres
Current Plan Designation: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units
per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres),
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
(451.13 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24
acres), Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
(474.37 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and
remove the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay to
allow single-family residential development
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Page 768
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Staff Recommendation: Approval
FINDINGS:
1) The companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, incorporates development
standards that will provide transition between the subject site and surrounding
Sonoran Preserve and open space areas.
2) The request will allow for single-family residential development at 3 dwelling
units per acre, as proposed by the companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2. The
proposed development will provide a maximum of 1,420 single-family units,
which supports the City’s need for additional housing.
3) The parcel is one of the last privately owned properties in the area and as
recommended by the North Black Canyon Corridor Plan, property owners who
want to rezone a site within the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay area can file a
General Plan Amendment to remove the overlay designation from their
property.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is located approximately at the southwest corner of the 24th Street
alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive. The site is vacant and single-family residential
is currently permitted on the site. The site is currently zoned S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence),
and RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family
Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District), which permits
approximately 1 dwelling unit per acre.
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 proposes a minor
amendment to the General Plan Land
Use Map to allow single-family residential
development. The proposal will modify
the land use designation to Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential
3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and
Preserves / Floodplain. The companion
rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, proposes a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Aerial Map, Source: Gammage &
allow single-family development, not to Burnham
exceed a maximum of 1,420 dwelling
Page 769
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
units at an overall density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. The proposed PUD
Development Narrative includes development, landscaping, and design standards that
exceed Zoning Ordinance standards and provide appropriate edge treatments for the
adjacent preserve areas.
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was
adopted in 1987 as an amendment to the
General Plan and provided direction
regarding land use planning within the
area bounded by Carefree Highway to the
north, the City of Scottsdale to the east,
the Central Arizona Project Canal and
Jomax Road to the south, and 67th
Avenue to the west. This alignment
bisected what is now known as the Verdin
property.
The plan identified the Northeast Outer
Loop freeway alignment, now known as Peripheral Areas C and D Plan Map,
the Sonoran Desert Drive alignment, was Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
intended to connect Interstate 17 with Development Department
Dynamite Boulevard alignment. The
alignment also acted as a dividing line
between lower density uses to the north
and higher density to the south.
In 2002 the City of Phoenix initiated the Sonoran Preserve Parkway Route Location
Study to determine an efficient east-west transportation corridor that would replace
the Northeast Outer Loop freeway. In 2004, the City amended the Street
Classification Map via GPA-CTYW-1-04, which realigned Sonoran Desert Drive to its
current alignment.
Page 770
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
The Infrastructure Limit Line and
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay were
adopted as part of the North Black
Canyon Corridor Plan. The Infrastructure
Limit Line acted as a guide to where the
sewer infrastructure to support
development. The Infrastructure Phasing
Overlay was intended to act as a timing
element to ensure infrastructure
supported growth was concentrated
within the Infrastructure Limit Line. Since
the plan’s adoption in 1999, significant
private investment and development has
Infrastructure Limit Line and Infrastructure
occurred within these boundaries,
Phasing Overlay Map, Source: City of
resulting in housing, commercial, and
Phoenix Planning and Development
employment uses within the North
Department
Gateway Village Core. With this
development water and sewer
infrastructure has also been installed in this area.
The North Black Canyon Corridor Plan also indicates that the City would not extend
infrastructure beyond the Infrastructure Limit Line until the growth corridor was
expanded or removed. The plan recommends that property owners who want to
rezone properties within the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay area can file a General
Plan Amendment to remove the overlay designation from their property. The
applicant’s request to remove the property from the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay will
allow for residential development on one of the only privately owned properties within
the overlay. Additionally, since most water and sewer infrastructure has been built
with the Infrastructure Limit Line, this provides an opportunity to revisit the overlay on
a case-by-case basis and reassess development beyond the limit line boundaries.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
The current General Plan Land Use Map designations for the site are Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre
(138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential
3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres),
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres).
Page 771
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
EXISTING PROPOSED
Existing and Proposed General Land Use Designation Maps, Source: City of Phoenix
Planning and Development Department
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 proposes to change the Land Use Map designations to Residential
2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. The
request will retain the Preserves / Floodplain designation on the southeast portion of
the site. The remaining portion of the site will have the Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre designation to accommodate the
proposed 1,420 single-family units. Staff is supportive of the request to remove the
Preserve designation because this is consistent with the private property owner’s
intent to develop the land at 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
NORTH
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is Sonoran Desert Drive and the
Sonoran Preserve. Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a major arterial roadway
and is an important east-west alignment between Interstate 17 and northeast Phoenix.
This roadway alignment is proposed to have a total of six lanes, three in each
Page 772
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
direction. The Sonoran Preserve consists of over 9,600 acres of relatively
undisturbed natural areas in North Phoenix with various trail connectivity throughout.
Additionally, this area is owned by the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD). This
area is designated Future Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre.
EAST
East of the subject site is Cave Creek Wash and its associated floodplain. The
floodplain also encroaches onto the southeast portion of the subject site. This area
directly east of the subject site is designated Preserves/Floodplain.
SOUTH
South of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation Area
designated as Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre and Publicly Owned Parks/Open Space. The Cave Buttes
Recreation Area is a park that overseen by the Maricopa County Flood Control
District. This area contains a number of dams that control flooding from washes in the
general area. The PUD development narrative for the companion Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18-2 contains standards which will provide open edge treatments adjacent to the
preserve and trail connection.
WEST
West of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve designated Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space and open space owned by the ASLD designated Future
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre.
RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE
• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels
of increased intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 will allow for a designation of Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre on the majority of
the site. As proposed in companion case, Z-62-19-2, the site will develop at
3.0 dwelling units per acre, incorporate open edge treatments, incorporate
various open space areas, and provide connectivity to the surrounding Sonoran
Preserve areas.
Page 773
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS
• DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of
housing types and densities where appropriate within each village that
support a broad range of lifestyles.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment and concurrent
rezoning case will allow for single-family residential development options
adjacent to a major arterial street and in close proximity to the North Gateway
Core and Cave Creek Road. Additionally, the various lot sizes and single-
family housing products proposed in the companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2,
will support a range of lifestyles for Phoenix residents.
• CERTAINTY & CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Require appropriate
transitions/buffers between neighborhoods and adjacent uses.
The uses adjacent to the subject site are Cave Creek Wash, the Sonoran
Preserve, and various open space opportunities. As proposed in the
companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, the development will provide open edge
treatments to provide a natural transition between the single-family
development and the adjacent open space.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, as Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain,
and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal.
This General Plan Amendment request and concurrent case Z-62-18-2 will allow
single-family residential development, not to exceed 1,420 units. Staff supports
removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay and designation change to Residential
2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, to allow
development at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre. Additionally, where the
floodplain encroaches onto the site, the Preserves / Floodplain designation will be
retained. The request will align with a land use designation that is respectful of the
adjacent Sonoran Preserve, while also being adjacent to a major arterial.
Writer
Julianna Pierre
March 9, 2022
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Page 774
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Page 775
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du/ac
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 776
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2_BW ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/acre
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du
E E E E E
Preserves / 0-1 or 1-2 du/ acre
Preserves / 2-3.5 or 3.5-5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 777
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, Item #5
– Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 778
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 779
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, Item #5
– Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 780
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 781
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 782
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 783
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 / Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, and
Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Z-TA-5-18-2, Item #5 – Z-75-18-2, and
Item #7 – Z-62-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 784
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 785
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 786
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Daniel Tome made a motion to approve GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2. The motion was seconded by Committee member Michelle Ricart.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 787
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request From Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 / Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, and
Preserves / Floodplain
Request To Residential 2 to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, and removal of the
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Denial as filed, approved with a modification
VPC Vote 10-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 788
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 789
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 790
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 791
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to deny GPA-GSTV-1-18-2 as filed, and approve
with the Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre designation removed. Committee
Member Santoro seconded the motion.
VOTE
10-1, motion to deny as filed, approve as modified, passed; Members Dean, Hankins,
Israel, Kollar, Nowell, Reynolds, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor;
Member Powell against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 792
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
STAFF ANALYSIS
April 26, 2022
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham,
PLC
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Acreage: 474.37 acres
Current Plan Designation: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units
per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres),
Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres),
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
(451.13 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24
acres), Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
(474.37 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and
remove the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay to
allow single-family residential development
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Page 793
Addendum A to the Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
April 26, 2022
Staff Recommendation: Approval, per Addendum A
Summary
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended approval by a 4-1 vote. The Desert View VPC heard this
request on April 5, 2022, and recommended denial as filed, approval with a modification
to remove the Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre designation.
The applicant’s original request was for 451.13 acres of the subject site to be
designated as Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre/Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, along with other requested designations. The applicant proposes to
modify their request to remove the Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
designation, per the Desert View Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Updated sketch maps are attached to reflect this change.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 per Addendum A.
Exhibits
Sketch Map (2 pages)
Page 794
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc. 4/14/2022
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du/ac
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 795
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2_BW ACRES: 474.37 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 3/08/2022
APPLICANT: Robert Johnson-Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc. 4/14/2022
EXISTING:
Preserves / 0 to 1 or 1 to 2 du/ac ( 138.83 +/- Acres)
Preserves / 2 to 3.5 or 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 312.30 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay ( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 5 du/acre
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
E E E E E
E E E E E
E E E E E
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du
E E E E E
Preserves / 0-1 or 1-2 du/ acre
Preserves / 2-3.5 or 3.5-5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac ( 451.13 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 23.24 +/- Acres)
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal
( 474.37 +/- Acres)
SONORAN DESERT DR
Proposed Change Area
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/acre
Preserves / Floodplain
Page 796
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 5
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-
18-2)
Request: Map Amendment
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive
From: Preserves/Residential 0 to 1/Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves/Residential 2 to 3.5/Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
and Preserves/Floodplain; and Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
To: Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves/Floodplain, and
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
Acreage: 474.37
Proposal: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map and remove the Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay to allow single-family residential development.
Applicant: Robert Johnson, Taylor Morrison/Arizona Inc.
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan E. Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval. Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Denied as filed, approved with modifications. Vote: 10-1.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per Addendum A of the Staff Analysis
Report.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, per
Addendum A of the Staff Analysis Report.
Maker: Simon
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2, incorporates development
standards that will provide transition between the subject site and surrounding
Sonoran Preserve and open space areas.
Page 797
2. The request will allow for single-family residential development at 3 dwelling
units per acre, as proposed by the companion rezoning case, Z-62-18-2. The
proposed development will provide a maximum of 1,420 single-family units,
which supports the City’s need for additional housing.
3. The parcel is one of the last privately owned properties in the area and as
recommended by the North Black Canyon Corridor Plan, property owners who
want to rezone a site within the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay area can file a
General Plan Amendment to remove the overlay designation from their
property.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 798
Page 799
Page 800
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(CONTINUED FROM JUNE 1, 2022) - Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption -
Rezoning Application Z-75-18-2 - South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the
16th Street and 32nd Street Alignments (Ordinance G-6992)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-75-18-
2 and rezone the site from RE-35 DCOD-A (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) and S-1 DCOD-A (Ranch or Farm
Residence, Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) to RE-35 (Single-Family
Residence District) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to allow single-family
residential. This is a companion case to GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-18-
2 and must be heard following GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Summary
Current Zoning: RE-35 DCOD-A (10.25 acres) and S-1 DCOD-A (144.81 acres)
Proposed Zoning: RE-35 (10.25 acres) and S-1 (144.81 acres)
Acreage: Approximately 155.06 acres
Proposed Use: Modify the boundary of the Desert Character Overlay District to remove
a portion from Sub-District A
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area in Z-
TA-5-18-2.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 6,
2018, April 2, 2019, and Dec. 7, 2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village
Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 8, 2018 and Dec. 9, 2021, for information
only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 4-1.
The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 5, 2022 and
recommended denial as filed, approval per the staff recommendation, by a 7-4 vote.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022 and
Page 801
recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, by a vote of 7-1.
Location
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 28239 N. 23rd St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 802
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-75-18-2) FROM RE-35 DCOD-A (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY
DISTRICT, SUBDISTRICT A) AND S-1 DCOD-A (RANCH OR
FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY
DISTRICT, SUB-DISTRICT A) TO RE-35 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) AND S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of approximately 155.06 acres located at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive in a portion of
Section 22, Township 5 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit
“A”, is hereby changed from 10.25 acres of “RE-35 DCOD-A” (Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character Overlay District, Subdistrict A) and 144.81 acres of “S-1
DCOD-A” (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-
District A) to 10.25 acres of “RE-35” (Single-Family Residence District) and 144.81 acres
of “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence District).
Page 803
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
Page 804
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 805
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-75-18-2
A parcel of land being situated within a portion of Township 5 North, Range 3 and 4 East
of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 3 East of
the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence North 89°52'51" East, 11908.90 feet;
Thence South 00°59'40" West, 2657.90 feet;
Thence South 89°26'27" West, 1274.34 feet;
Thence South 00°17'01" West, 6593.46 feet;
Thence South 01°35'31" East, 6542.03 feet;
Thence South 86°57'51" East, 1315.88 feet;
Thence South 26°41'09" West, 2996.00 feet;
Thence North 65°42'18" West, 2174.55 feet;
Thence South 26°52'29" West, 2037.98 feet;
Thence South 67°49'59" East, 2208.25 feet;
Thence South 27°25'16" West, 3791.32 feet;
Thence South 27°25'16" West, 4944.99 feet;
Thence North 00°29'51" West, 1565.18 feet;
Thence South 89°11'28" West, 1292.60 feet;
Thence North 45°35'29" West, 890.47 feet;
Thence North 01°52'41" West, 792.36 feet;
Thence North 46°04'52" West, 973.22 feet;
Thence North 87°16'35" West, 545.87 feet;
Page 806
Thence North 00°33'20" West, 1337.25 feet;
Thence South 44°27'13" West, 963.92 feet;
Thence South 00°00'00" East, 415.44 feet;
Thence South 87°27'28" West, 584.79 feet;
Thence North 06°34'52" West, 339.74 feet;
Thence North 87°39'34" West, 636.66 feet;
Thence North 49°23'55" West, 837.83 feet;
Thence North 85°02'08" East, 299.72 feet;
Thence North 00°00'00" East, 701.00 feet;
Thence South 88°51'30" East, 649.25 feet;
Thence North 00°34'05" West, 1311.25 feet;
Thence North 89°16'58" West, 1038.64 feet;
Thence North 01°08'41" East, 649.19 feet;
Thence North 90°00'00" East, 701.03 feet;
Thence North 43°21'40" West, 964.27 feet;
Thence North 31°19'02" East, 893.05 feet;
Thence North 24°55'42" East, 990.40 feet;
Thence North 44°36'08" East, 639.57 feet;
Thence North 25°18'24" East, 908.71 feet;
Thence North 67°25'03" West, 1840.79 feet;
Thence North 00°00'14" East, 329.69 feet;
Thence North 00°20'28" East, 2501.69 feet;
Thence South 89°48'41" West, 2642.27 feet;
Thence South 00°28'49" West, 1723.97 feet;
Page 807
Thence North 67°25'03" West, 3381.55 feet;
Thence North 27°54'37" East, 10982.54 feet;
Thence North 08°40'40" East, 4168.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described parcel contains a computed area of 286,251,928 sq. ft. (6571.4400
acres) more or less and being subject to any easements, restrictions, rights-of-way of
record or otherwise.
Page 808
Page 809
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
Village Planning Committee Meeting North Gateway – March 10, 2022
Dates: Desert View – April 5, 2022
Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 2022
Request From: RE-35 DCOD A (481.05 acres), S-1 DCOD A
(155.19 acres)
Request To: RE-35 (236.97 acres), S-1 (155.19 acres), RE-
35 DCOD B (244.08)
Proposed Use: Modify the boundary of Desert Character
Overlay Districts
Location: South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the
16th and 32nd Street alignments
Owner: MacEwan Ranch, LLC
Arizona State Land Department
Applicant / Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2
General Plan Conformity
Future Parks / Open Space or
Residential 1 dwelling unit per acre
Preserve / Residential 0 to 1 and 1 to 2
General Plan Land Use Map Designation dwelling units per acre
Preserve / Floodplain
Residential 0 to 2 dwelling units per acre
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre
Street Map Sonoran Desert 150-foot roadway
Major arterial
Classification Drive easement
Page 810
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; DESERT LANDSCAPE;
LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote land uses that preserve Phoenix’s natural open
spaces.
The proposed Desert Maintenance Overlay applicability area proposes to maintain the
district standards and design guidelines that were originally intended to ensure
compatible development adjacent to the preserve areas north of Sonoran Desert Drive.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND
USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of
local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
Removal of the Desert Character Overlay Districts standards from property south of the
Sonoran Desert Drive alignment will allow for a nominal increase in intensity that was
contemplated in the Peripheral Area C and D and North Land Use plans.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: New
development and expansion or redevelopment of existing development in or near
residential areas should be compatible with existing uses and consistent with
adopted plans.
The development proposed in the Verdin PUD, via companion Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18, integrates several design considerations that are consistent with the adopted
plans for the area in addition to many of the design guidelines incorporated in the Desert
Maintenance Overlay of Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Desert Character Overlay Districts: See Background Item Nos. 3 and 4.
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan: See Background Item No. 5.
North Land Use Plan: See Background Item No. 6.
Page 811
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant RE-35 DCOD A, S-1 DCOD A
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve,
North RE-35 DCOD A
Vacant
West Vacant RE-35 DCOD A
East Vacant RE-35 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD B
South Vacant RE-35, S-1, RE-35 DCOD B
Background/Issues/Analysis
REQUEST
1. This is a request to rezone
636.24 acres located south of
Sonoran Desert Drive between
the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments from RE-35 DCOD A
(Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character
Overlay Districts, Desert
Maintenance Overlay Sub-
District A) and S-1 DCOD A
(Ranch or Farm Residence,
Desert Character Overlay
Districts, Desert Maintenance
Overlay Sub-District A) to RE-35
(Single-Family Residence
District, RE-35 DCOD B (Single-
Family Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay
Districts, Desert Maintenance
Overlay Sub-District B) and S-1
(Ranch or Farm Residence) for
a modification of the boundary of
Applicant Proposed Request, Zoning
the Desert Character Overlay Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix
Districts.
Page 812
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
This request is a companion case to
Text Amendment Case No. Z-TA-5-
18-2. If approved, Z-TA-5-18-2
would amend the Zoning Ordinance
language and maps in Section 653
whereas Z-75-18-2 would amend
the Zoning Map to reflect the
changes proposed.
Staff is recommending that a
smaller portion of the applicant’s
request be approved to be
consistent with the staff
recommendation for Z-TA-5-18.
The staff recommended change
area (155.06 acres) is shown to the
right.
Staff Recommendation, Zoning Sketch
Map, Source: City of Phoenix
2. In addition to Z-TA-5-18-2, there are two additional concurrent requests.
General Plan Amendment Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 and Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18-2 encompass the Verdin site (488 acres). General Plan Amendment
Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 seeks to modify the land use map designation and
removal from the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-
2 proposes to rezone the property to a Planned Unit Development district.
DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICTS
3. The Desert Character Overlay Districts, Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance,
was established in 2001 via Text Amendment Case No. Z-TA-3-99 with a
general purpose to implement the North Land Use Plan. The intent of the
overlay was to establish three character areas; Desert Maintenance, Rural
Desert and Suburban Desert, to define the nature of development while
maintaining undisturbed areas and to provide guidance for new development.
Standards for the Desert Maintenance Overlay District were included in the
original text amendment. Standards for the Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts have not been established.
Page 813
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
4. The overlay district contains distinct permitted uses and district standards for
Desert Maintenance Character Sub-Districts A and B in addition to design
guidelines applicable to both subdistricts. Single-family residential uses are
permitted in both subdistricts, with attached dwelling units only permitted in Sub-
District B.
District standards for the subdistricts include provisions designed to address lot
size, building envelope, height, setbacks, access, native landscaping and
treatment of washes. Design guidelines contain additional guidance on site
disturbance, native plant preservation, building and wall design, and access to
preserve areas, among others.
PERIPHERAL AREAS C AND D PLAN
5. In 1987, Phoenix City Council adopted the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan as an
amendment to the General Plan. The intent of the Peripheral Areas C and D
Plan was to serve as a guide for future land use and development in the
planning area, which consisted of approximately 111 square miles of largely
undeveloped land north of the Central Arizona Project canal in North Phoenix.
Within the Implementation Program section of the Plan, further refinement of the
general character elements was suggested prior to any formal ordinance
adoption.
NORTH LAND USE PLAN
6. The North Land Use Plan was adopted in 1996 to further the existing policies of
the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan. The Plan divided the planning area into
three character areas; Desert Preserve, Rural Desert and Suburban Residential,
and suggested that overlay districts be developed to provide clear development
standards in line with community desires. The Desert Preserve character area
aligns with the area included in the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts.
Page 814
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
North Land Use Plan Character Areas, Source: City of Phoenix
VERDIN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
7. The Verdin Planned Unit Development (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-
18-2) intregrates a number of design considerations based on Desert
Maintenane Character District standards. These include a sensitive transition
from open space to developed areas, conservation of washes and wildlife
habitats, and use of native plants.
In addition to the considerations based on overlay standards, the Planned Unit
Development includes enhanced standards for increased open space,
connectivity to adjacent preserve areas, a public trail and heightened landscape
standards developed in concert with the National Wildlife Federation.
These standards collectively ensure appropriate development within the
undisturbed desert context.
Page 815
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE ROADWAY ALIGNMENT HISTORY
8. The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan included discussion of a proposed
Northeast Outer Loop. The Northeast Outer Loop was a planned limited access
extension of the Northwest Loop from Interstate 17, north of the Union Hills and
Cave Buttes recreation areas, connecting to Dynamite Boulevard and traversing
east toward the city of Scottsdale. Proposed land uses for Area D (north of
Jomax Road) were contemplated based on proposed transportation
infrastructure, with a Village Core planned for the northwest corner of Cave
Creek Road and the Northeast Outer Loop / Dynamite Road alignment.
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan Land Use and Circulation, Source: City of Phoenix
9. By the North Land Use Plan’s adoption, plans for the Northeast Outer Loop had
ceased. As a result, the planned Core at Cave Creek and Dynamite Roads was
reduced in size and geared to function as a community service area instead of
an employment hub. Reduction in the planned commercial area at this location
contributed to the inclusion of the area west of Cave Creek Road into the Desert
Preserve character area identified in the plan. While no longer planned as a
limited access roadway, Dynamite Road was utilized as a dividing line between
a planned preservation buffer for the Cave Creek Wash to the north and a more
dense residental area adjacent to the Cave Buttes Recreational area to the
south.
10. While an east-west connection between Interstate 17 and northeast Phoenix
has been planned since 1987, public involvment efforts to refine the alignment
and type of roadway commenced in 2002. The final aligment for Sonoran
Parkway, adopted by Phoenix City Council in 2006 as a result of the
recommendation by the East Sonoran Parkway Alignment Committee, was
carefully designed to minimize the impact of the roadway on the future mountain
preserve area and intended to serve as a buffer between the preserve and
adjacent development. Construction of Sonoran Boulevard, now known as the
northern leg of Sonoran Desert Drive, began in 2010 and was completed in
2013.
Page 816
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
11. Due to the shift in the transportation corridor from the inception of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts in addition to the enhanced standards contained in
the Verdin PUD, the staff recommended modification to the Sub-District
boundaries and associated ordinance language is warranted.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
12. At the time the staff report was written, staff has received 82 letters in oppositon
and three letters in support of the overall proposal. Several letters in opposition
expressed concern with proposed overlay modification.
Findings
1. The rezoning request is a companion case to Z-TA-5-18-2 and would update the
Zoning Map boundaries for the changes proposed.
2. The proposal is consistent with changes in the transportation corridor alignment
since originally adopted.
3. The proposal maintains overlay district standards for the property north of
Sonoran Desert Drive, adjacent to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, and allows for
integration of appropriate design standards from the overlay in the Verdin
Planned Unit Development (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2).
Stipulations
None.
Writer
Samantha Keating
March 9, 2022
Team Leader
Joshua Bednarek
Exhibits
Proposed Sketch Map
Staff Recommendation Sketch Map
Aerial Sketch Map
Staff Recommendation Aerial Sketch Map
Page 817
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP *
Sub-District B
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 *
AN X 22 1
C-1 * S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 155.19 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 481.05 a.c.)
Z-75-18 REVISION DATES:
2/25/2022
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
S-1 ( 155.19 a.c.)
QUARTER SEC. NO.
R9, R10, Q9, RE-35 ( 236.97 a.c.)
636.24 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
TO: RE-35 DCOD Sub-District B ( 244.08 a.c.)
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
Q10, P9, P10
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 155, 529 N/A, 635
S-1, RE-35, RE-35 DCOD B 155, 260, 268 N/A, 313, 322
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18.mxd
Page 818
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 819
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP *
Sub-District B
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 *
AN X 22 1
C-1 * S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06mapservices@phoenix.gov
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 155.19 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 481.05 a.c.)
Z-75-18 REVISION DATES:
2/25/2022
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
S-1 ( 155.19 a.c.)
QUARTER SEC. NO.
R9, R10, Q9, RE-35 ( 236.97 a.c.)
636.24 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
TO: RE-35 DCOD Sub-District B ( 244.08 a.c.)
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
Q10, P9, P10
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 155, 529 N/A, 635
S-1, RE-35, RE-35 DCOD B 155, 260, 268 N/A, 313, 322
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18.mxd
Page 820
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06mapservices@phoenix.gov
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 821
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request From RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District) and S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence)
Proposed Use Modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries to modify a portion from Sub-District A to
Sub-District B and to remove a portion of property from
Sub-District A to allow for single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 822
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 823
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480 PUD. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately
build 1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan. She stated they are working
with the Deer Valley School District to come up with a solution to the school capacity
issue. She stated they are looking into the option of Cave Creek Schools.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, expressed several concerns:
- Traffic safety and cyclist safety on Sonoran Desert Drive.
- Public safety response time.
- Elimination of the night sky.
- Density is too high.
He then asked if the applicant has been in communication with the State Land
Department to see when the surrounding land will be opened for auction. Susan
Demmitt stated it won’t be within the next 5 years.
Jason Stokes, VPC member, asked where the closest fire station is located. Ms.
Demmitt stated Cave Creek and Dynamite.
Steve Tucker, VPC member, asked what would happen in the notch. Ms. Demmitt
states most likely residential. Mr. Tucker stated that the road improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive need to happen before development.
Julie Read, VPC member, asked how many homes are approved for Sonoran Gate. Ms.
Demmitt responded 255 homes.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 824
Shannon Simon, VPC member, inquired about the City’s timeline for the complete build
out of Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated the light pollution from Sonoran Gate isn’t as
bad as she thought. Ms. Simon then asked if all the neighborhoods will be gated. Ms.
Demmitt responded that some neighborhoods will be gated.
Julie Read, VPC member, stated she has concerns about the school capacity issue and
the fact that some of the students could be going to Cave Creek Schools. She stated
that a neighborhood elementary school builds a sense of community. Ms. Read asked
what the target market will be for this development. Ms. Demmitt states they are still
trying to identify the target. Julie Read asked how many children there are in Sonoran
Gate. A resident in the audience who lives in Sonoran Gate stated about 1 in 8 homes
have kids.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated that Sonoran Gate has a lot of amenities for kids
so there might not be a lot of kids right now but they can come. She stated she is
concerned with the school capacity. She said that it is at least a 20 to 25-minute drive to
the closest Cave Creek elementary school by car, so it would be even longer by bus.
Susan Demmitt stated that Taylor Morrison is committed to working with the school
districts to find a solution.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated she is concerned about school buses going in and
out of the neighborhood with the traffic and the speeds vehicles travel along Sonoran
Desert Drive. She also stated open enrollment can be deceiving because students can
get kicked out of the school.
The floor was open to public comment.
Michelle Kelly, resident, stated she was opposed to the request. She stated she is
concerned about the density. She stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills, which is lower
in density than the proposed project. She stated that Sonoran Foothills Elementary land
was gifted by the developer. She is concerned about police and fire response times.
She stated the project is too dense without the proper infrastructure in place.
Burt Bragin, resident, voiced his concerns about Sonoran Desert Drive and the current
traffic. He stated the connection to the 303 needs to be made before the project is
approved. He stated Sonoran Foothills has 1,300 homes and a school was gifted by the
developer. He stated this development has 6 to 7 times more homes that Sonoran Gate.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that Deer Valley Schools doesn’t want a school site at
this location.
Cynthia Wise, resident, stated she is in favor of the request. She said Taylor Morrison
did a great job with the current infrastructure improvements within Sonoran Gate.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated he is a park steward for the Apache Wash trailhead. He
stated this development would change the entire character of the area. He then asked
the developer how they will make it look like the preserve.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 825
J.R. Oliver, resident, stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills and has to wait a long time to
get out of her subdivision. She stated the connection to the 303 would help a lot.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that is more of a regional issue and to talk to the City’s
Street Transportation Department.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated she opposes the project and is a resident of Desert
Enclave. She said on the way to the meeting they had to wait until 56 cars went by to
turn out. She stated this development will have an adverse reaction on the desert
wildlife and preserve area. She stated this development is in contradiction of the
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
L. Chicchillo, resident, stated the current Taylor Morrison project looks like row houses.
He stated he lives in Desert Enclave and is worried about the traffic.
Spero Papos, resident, asked if the land had been purchased. The applicant confirmed
it had not been purchased yet. He inquired about traffic lights.
Julie Read, VPC member asked if the applicant has met with ADOT because they
would like to see more information about the project.
There was then a committee discussion about how Dove Valley Road, Cave Creek
Road and 27th Avenue all get flooded out in the monsoon storms.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, stated that the North Gateway minutes will be forwarded onto
the Desert View VPC with their packet so they are aware of the discussion that took
place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 826
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request From RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District) and S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence)
Proposed Use Modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries to modify a portion from Sub-District A to
Sub-District B and to remove a portion of property from
Sub-District A to allow for single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 827
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 828
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 829
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 830
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting April 2, 2019
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and to remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, gave a presentation of the case up to this point in time. She
stated that they started this process back in August. Ms. Demmitt went through the
General Plan history of the area, along with the Desert Character Overlay District
establishment. She summarized the infrastructure improvements that would be required
for the subdivision to be built. Ms. Demmitt went on to describe the comments the
developer is receiving from members of the public. The first comment was that the
property should stay S-1. Ms. Demmitt stated that staying S-1 would be one home per
acre. Having a subdivision with multiple sized lots/homes would be more affordable for
residents to live in proximity to the preserve.
The next comment from the public that was addressed is the condition of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Ms. Demmitt stated they are working with the City and the State Land
Department to evaluate. She went on to present pages form the 2002 council report that
indicated that at full capacity, Sonoran Desert Drive will be able to handle 50,000 cars a
day. The road was intended to be a major thoroughfare.
The next concern Ms. Demmitt addressed was the acquisition of Sonoran Preserve
Land. She went on to state that the MacEwen property has been privately held since the
1950’s. Taylor Morrison is agreeable to put a public trail through the center of the
property, adjacent to the wash corridor, to connect the preserve north and south of
Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated they will comply with the Sonoran Edge Treatment
Guidelines. Ms. Demmitt stated the City’s Park and Recreation Department is currently
looking at acquiring the land to the east of the MacEwen parcel for preserve.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 831
Lou Lagrave stated that he understands that Sonoran Desert Drive is intended to be a
six-lane arterial and the General Plan on the southern two-thirds of the property has the
land use designation that supports the proposed density but that he still has concerns.
Mr. Lagrave stated that he is concerned about the traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, how
the kids will get to school and the proposed lot sizes.
Susan Demmitt addressed Mr. Lagrave and stated that they are looking into what they
can do to alleviate some of the concerns regarding Sonoran Desert Drive but the
construction of the southern leg is 47 million dollars. She stated that the kids that live in
this development will have the option of attending either Deer Valley Schools or Cave
Creek Schools. She stated that both school districts will be providing bus service into
the neighborhood.
Jill Hankins asked if the Mesquite Wash is a 404 wash. Susan Demmitt referred to
Nguyen Lam on her development team. Mr. Lam stated they are disturbing less than an
acre and it is not within the 404-protected area. Ms. Hankins asked if there have been
any studies done regarding cultural items or protected species. Mr. Lam stated the
studies have been done and nothing was found.
Doug Dickson stated that the committee has received many emails opposition and not
one in support. Doug Dickson stated that they should talk to State Land about swapping
this parcel for a better suited piece of land. He asked if the applicant had explored this
option. Ms. Demmitt stated that the City hasn’t identified this piece of land as preserve
land, but they have not discussed a swap with State Land.
Steve Bowser stated that the committee has letters in front of them in opposition from
the Sierra Club and PMPC.
Steve Bowser read the cards in opposition that didn’t wish to speak.
The floor was opened for public comment.
Debra Sedillo Dugan, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic and views. She
said the signs were posted where no one could see them until the applicant recently
moved them.
John Furniss, resident, stated he is the Chair of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve
Committee for the Parks and Recreation Department. He said there should be a letter
from their committee to deny this project. He stated that they aren’t opposed to growth,
but this will set precedence and that we need to protect what he have.
Stacie Beute, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She has been a longtime
friend to the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and advises on committees. She said that
Taylor Morrison will be selling the homes with the added amenity of the proximity to the
preserve, but they are developing on the preserve. She stated she is concerned about
the impacts on the environment.
Amanda Farr, resident, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is currently a safe place to
cycle and run. If this development is approved, it will no longer be safe.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 832
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated that he is a Park Steward for the Phoenix Mountain
Preserve. He stated that he started the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group as an
advocacy group in response to the request. He stated that the proposal isn’t consistent
with the North Land Use Plan and the Desert View Character Plan. Mr. Kirkilas urged
the committee that if it doesn’t make sense, say no to the proposal.
Daniel Centilli, resident, stated that he is a Desert Ridge homeowner. He said the
current DCOD overlay prevents something like this proposal from happening. He stated
that the applicant is asking for exceptions to the law. He went on to state the preserve is
our legacy.
Patrick Havley, resident, thanked the committee. He stated he is concerned for the
safety of cyclists on Sonoran Desert Drive. He also stated this project won’t contribute
to the overall good of the City.
Gannon Burleigh, resident, said that he is opposed and has concerns about traffic,
schools and the impact on the preserve. He said that the project is irresponsible
development and that the removal of the overlay district that protects the preserve is
ridiculous.
Laura Jones, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated the development should be one acre lots to preserve the wildlife.
Patrick McMullen, resident, states that he is the President of the PMPC. He stated that
the Phoenix Mountain Preserve Council has been around since the 1970’s to preserve
the desert. He stated that PMPC is opposed to the request.
Mandy Fellows, resident, passed out a study from an ASU professor concerning the
ecological impact and flooding concerns in the area. She stated that this area is
downstream from three dams, with the closest dam being 1.5 miles away.
John Trojan, resident, stated he is opposed to the request with concerns about traffic,
pedestrian safety and allowing the developer to craft their own zoning standards.
Lainy Porter, resident, stated she moved to Arizona for pain management. She stated
that she trains for triathlons on Sonoran Desert Drive and is concerned about the
increase in traffic.
Claudia Wagner, resident, stated she is a trail runner and has concerns about the
danger the increased traffic with cause on Sonoran Desert Drive. She is also concerned
about the potential for flooding.
Heather Larson, resident, stated she is concerned about the increase in traffic and
pedestrian safety.
Tim Holt, resident, said that he moved to Phoenix from Seattle. He said this proposal is
just setting precedence and the next development will be even more dense. Mr. Holt
went on to state this project is about money and greed.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 833
Brett Scholar, resident, stated that he uses Sonoran Desert Drive to run and cycle. He
questioned the benefit the applicant will bring to the area. He stated that the property
should stay as it is currently zoned.
Lindsey Tillman, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She said that the City
needs to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
Susan Beccian, resident, stated that she is one of the only people that have received
letters about this case but didn’t receive one concerning the meeting tonight. She said
she is concerned that Gammage and Burnham isn’t being upfront with the community.
Cassandra Leone, resident, thanked her neighbors for coming out to oppose the zoning
request. She said she is concerned about pedestrian safety and the traffic on Sonoran
Desert Drive. She said she has read the PUD and has concerns about the sustainability
section.
Michelle Kelley, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. She commented
that just because a plan is 30 years old doesn’t mean it’s not a good plan. It means the
community and the planning department were visioning long term. This request doesn’t
comply with the Desert View Character Plan. Ms. Kelley went on to state that the school
is over capacity and there is no real plan from the applicant to resolve that issue. She
closed by stating the area should be preserved and the plans should not be changed.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. Ms. Pierce went on to
state that this project is going to be a financial burden on taxpayers. Even though the
applicant must pay to extend infrastructure, the taxpayers pay to maintain this
infrastructure that is being extended to only serve this subdivision.
Christine Severance, resident, stated that that the signs for the hearing were posted far
from the road so they couldn’t be read. She stated the applicant purchased the property
with the current zoning and that it shouldn’t be changed.
Karen Severance, resident, stated that the preserve means a lot to her. She urged the
committee to think about the ecosystem when they vote on this case at a later date.
Jennifer Severance, resident, stated that nature needs to have space. The edges of the
preserve are important.
Karl Mar, resident, stated that he is opposed to the request. He said that the
infrastructure can’t handle a development of this size.
Patty Killinger, resident, stated that she has been in the area since the 1970’s. She said
that the parcel’s adjacency to the Sonoran Preserve is important.
Anna Lewandowski, resident, stated she just found out about the project about two
weeks ago and came to the meeting to learn more about it. She said from listening to
the applicant’s presentation and the testimony of the public, it sounds like this
development is 10 years too soon. The current infrastructure and school systems can’t
handle the residents this development will generate.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 834
Mike Rooney, resident, stated this project is political. This development is not consistent
with the Desert View Character Plan.
Patricia Story, resident, stated that she is concerned for public safety in the areas. She
said the area already has an emergency response time issue.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 835
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 6, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and to remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately build
1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan.
Lou Lagrave had questions regarding the alignment of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated
it is a nice development in the wrong location and that there is no justification for the
density. He stated that according to the North Land Use Plan that this area is intended
to be 2 dwelling units per acre or less.
Rick Nowell clarified that the applicant would only be adding one lane in front of their
own development, not the entire length of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated it is a nice
project in the wrong place. He stated that Sanctuary at Desert Ridge is unsightly and he
doesn’t want to see that in this location.
Rick Powell asked which school district in which the property is located. Ms. Demmitt
said Deer Valley.
Steve Bowser asked how long the land has been privately held. Ms. Demmitt stated
since the 1950’s.
Ryan Schaefer asked if the developer was contributing to the Sonoran Desert Drive
alignment. Ms. Demmitt said the subdivision will be contributing to impact fees.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 836
Jill Hankins expressed concern about the safety of the cyclists on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated there needs to be an underpass and islands for the bikers.
Steve Bowser opened the meeting to public comment.
Richard Puleri, resident, stated he has concerns about the current traffic congestion on
Sonoran Desert Drive and inquired on when Sonoran Desert Drive will be expanded
and connected.
Michael Kaciemba, resident, stated he lives in Sonoran Foothills and that he has
concerns about the current traffic congestion. He stated that this project shouldn’t be
improved until the streets are expanded. He also addressed the school doesn’t have
capacity.
Public comment closed.
Reginald Younger said that Taylor Morrison expanded the roads with Sky Crossing.
Rick Powell states he has concerns about the school capacity.
Deanna Chew asked if residents would have a City of Phoenix address. Ms. Demmitt
stated she believes they will.
Rick Nowell asked if a traffic study has been done. Ms. Demmitt says it was recently
completed but has not been submitted to the City yet.
There was a brief committee discussion concerning the possibility of age restriction
subdivisions within the development.
Louis Lagrave stated he believes in land rights but this needs to come back with R1-10
zoning. Louis Lagrave also requested staff send out the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 837
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request From RE-35 DCOD A (Single-Family Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) and S-
1 DCOD A (Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District A)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
B (Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District B) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation to approve the
staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Z-TA-5-18-2, Item #6 – GPA-DSTV-18-
2, and Item #7 – Z-62-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 838
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 839
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 840
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Daniel Tome made a motion to approve Z-75-18-2, per
the staff recommendation to approve the staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2. The
motion was seconded by Committee member Michelle Ricart.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 841
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request From RE-35 DCOD A (Single-Family Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) and S-
1 DCOD A (Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District A)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
B (Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District B) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Deny as filed, approved per the staff recommendation to
approve the staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2
VPC Vote 7-4
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 842
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 843
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 844
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 845
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – Z-75-18-2
Committee Member Warren made a motion to deny Z-75-18-2 as filed, and approve
per the staff recommendation. Vice Chair Lagrave seconded the motion.
VOTE
7-4, motion to deny as filed, approve per staff recommendation passed; Members Dean,
Israel, Kollar, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Members Hankins,
Nowell, Powell, and Reynolds against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 846
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
April 26, 2022
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date May 5, 2022
Request From RE-35 DCOD-A (Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-
District A) (10.25 acres) and S-1 DCOD-A
(Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District A) (144.81 acres)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District)
(10.25 acres) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence) (144.81 acres)
Proposed Use Modify the boundary of the Desert Character
Overlay District to remove a portion from Sub-
District A
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Owner MacEwen Ranch, LLC and Arizona State Land
Department
Applicant/Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation Approval, per Addendum A
Summary
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended denial as filed, approval per the staff recommendation by a 4-
1 vote. The Desert View VPC heard this request on April 5, 2022, recommended denial
as filed, approval per the staff recommendation by a 7-4 vote.
The applicant’s original request was to rezone 636.24 acres located south of
Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th Street and 32nd Street alignments from RE-35
DCOD-A and S-1 DCOD-A to RE-35, RE-35 DCOD B, and S-1 for a modification of the
boundary of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
The applicant proposed to modify their request to align with the staff recommendation to
rezone 155.06 acres from RE-35 DCOD-A and S-1 DCOD-A to RE-35 and S-1.
Updated sketch maps are attached to reflect this change.
Page 847
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-75-18-2
April 26, 2022
Conclusion and Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Z-75-18-2 per Addendum A.
Exhibits
Sketch Map (2 pages)
Page 848
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06mapservices@phoenix.gov
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 849
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 850
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 6
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-75-18-2 (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-
18-2)
Location: South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and 32nd Street
alignments
From: RE-35 DCOD A and S-1 DCOD A
To: RE-35 and S-1
Acreage: Approximately 155.06
Proposal: Modify the boundary of the Desert Character Overlay District to remove a
portion from Sub-District A.
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Owner: MacEwan Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Denial as filed; approval of the staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 11/6/2018 Information only.
North Gateway 11/8/2018 Information only.
Desert View 4/2/2019 Information only.
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Denial as filed, approval per the staff recommendation. Vote: 7-4.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve Z-75-18-2, per the
Addendum A Staff Report.
Maker: Simon
Second: Johnson
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The rezoning request is a companion case to Z-TA-5-18-2 and would update the
Zoning Map boundaries for the changes proposed.
2. The proposal is consistent with changes in the transportation corridor alignment since
originally adopted.
Page 851
3. The proposal maintains overlay district standards for the property north of Sonoran
Desert Drive, adjacent to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, and allows for integration of
appropriate design standards from the overlay in the Verdin Planned Unit
Development (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2).
Stipulations:
None.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 852
Page 853
Page 854
Report
Rezoning Application Z-75-18-2 - South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the
16th Street and 32nd Street Alignments (Ordinance G-6992)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-75-18-
2 and rezone the site from RE-35 DCOD-A (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) and S-1 DCOD-A (Ranch or Farm
Residence, Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) to RE-35 (Single-Family
Residence District) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to allow single-family
residential. This is a companion case to GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-18-
2 and must be heard following GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Summary
Current Zoning: RE-35 DCOD-A (10.25 acres) and S-1 DCOD-A (144.81 acres)
Proposed Zoning: RE-35 (10.25 acres) and S-1 (144.81 acres)
Acreage: Approximately 155.06 acres
Proposed Use: Modify the boundary of the Desert Character Overlay District to remove
a portion from Sub-District A
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area in Z-
TA-5-18-2.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 6,
2018, April 2, 2019, and Dec. 7, 2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village
Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 8, 2018 and Dec. 9, 2021, for information
only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 4-1.
The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 5, 2022 and
recommended denial as filed, approval per the staff recommendation, by a 7-4 vote.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022 and
Page 801
recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, by a vote of 7-1.
Location
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 28239 N. 23rd St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 802
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-75-18-2) FROM RE-35 DCOD-A (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY
DISTRICT, SUBDISTRICT A) AND S-1 DCOD-A (RANCH OR
FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY
DISTRICT, SUB-DISTRICT A) TO RE-35 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) AND S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of approximately 155.06 acres located at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive in a portion of
Section 22, Township 5 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit
“A”, is hereby changed from 10.25 acres of “RE-35 DCOD-A” (Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character Overlay District, Subdistrict A) and 144.81 acres of “S-1
DCOD-A” (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-
District A) to 10.25 acres of “RE-35” (Single-Family Residence District) and 144.81 acres
of “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence District).
Page 803
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
Page 804
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 805
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-75-18-2
A parcel of land being situated within a portion of Township 5 North, Range 3 and 4 East
of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 3 East of
the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence North 89°52'51" East, 11908.90 feet;
Thence South 00°59'40" West, 2657.90 feet;
Thence South 89°26'27" West, 1274.34 feet;
Thence South 00°17'01" West, 6593.46 feet;
Thence South 01°35'31" East, 6542.03 feet;
Thence South 86°57'51" East, 1315.88 feet;
Thence South 26°41'09" West, 2996.00 feet;
Thence North 65°42'18" West, 2174.55 feet;
Thence South 26°52'29" West, 2037.98 feet;
Thence South 67°49'59" East, 2208.25 feet;
Thence South 27°25'16" West, 3791.32 feet;
Thence South 27°25'16" West, 4944.99 feet;
Thence North 00°29'51" West, 1565.18 feet;
Thence South 89°11'28" West, 1292.60 feet;
Thence North 45°35'29" West, 890.47 feet;
Thence North 01°52'41" West, 792.36 feet;
Thence North 46°04'52" West, 973.22 feet;
Thence North 87°16'35" West, 545.87 feet;
Page 806
Thence North 00°33'20" West, 1337.25 feet;
Thence South 44°27'13" West, 963.92 feet;
Thence South 00°00'00" East, 415.44 feet;
Thence South 87°27'28" West, 584.79 feet;
Thence North 06°34'52" West, 339.74 feet;
Thence North 87°39'34" West, 636.66 feet;
Thence North 49°23'55" West, 837.83 feet;
Thence North 85°02'08" East, 299.72 feet;
Thence North 00°00'00" East, 701.00 feet;
Thence South 88°51'30" East, 649.25 feet;
Thence North 00°34'05" West, 1311.25 feet;
Thence North 89°16'58" West, 1038.64 feet;
Thence North 01°08'41" East, 649.19 feet;
Thence North 90°00'00" East, 701.03 feet;
Thence North 43°21'40" West, 964.27 feet;
Thence North 31°19'02" East, 893.05 feet;
Thence North 24°55'42" East, 990.40 feet;
Thence North 44°36'08" East, 639.57 feet;
Thence North 25°18'24" East, 908.71 feet;
Thence North 67°25'03" West, 1840.79 feet;
Thence North 00°00'14" East, 329.69 feet;
Thence North 00°20'28" East, 2501.69 feet;
Thence South 89°48'41" West, 2642.27 feet;
Thence South 00°28'49" West, 1723.97 feet;
Page 807
Thence North 67°25'03" West, 3381.55 feet;
Thence North 27°54'37" East, 10982.54 feet;
Thence North 08°40'40" East, 4168.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
The above described parcel contains a computed area of 286,251,928 sq. ft. (6571.4400
acres) more or less and being subject to any easements, restrictions, rights-of-way of
record or otherwise.
Page 808
Page 809
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
Village Planning Committee Meeting North Gateway – March 10, 2022
Dates: Desert View – April 5, 2022
Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 2022
Request From: RE-35 DCOD A (481.05 acres), S-1 DCOD A
(155.19 acres)
Request To: RE-35 (236.97 acres), S-1 (155.19 acres), RE-
35 DCOD B (244.08)
Proposed Use: Modify the boundary of Desert Character
Overlay Districts
Location: South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the
16th and 32nd Street alignments
Owner: MacEwan Ranch, LLC
Arizona State Land Department
Applicant / Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2
General Plan Conformity
Future Parks / Open Space or
Residential 1 dwelling unit per acre
Preserve / Residential 0 to 1 and 1 to 2
General Plan Land Use Map Designation dwelling units per acre
Preserve / Floodplain
Residential 0 to 2 dwelling units per acre
Residential 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre
Street Map Sonoran Desert 150-foot roadway
Major arterial
Classification Drive easement
Page 810
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; DESERT LANDSCAPE;
LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote land uses that preserve Phoenix’s natural open
spaces.
The proposed Desert Maintenance Overlay applicability area proposes to maintain the
district standards and design guidelines that were originally intended to ensure
compatible development adjacent to the preserve areas north of Sonoran Desert Drive.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND
USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of
local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
Removal of the Desert Character Overlay Districts standards from property south of the
Sonoran Desert Drive alignment will allow for a nominal increase in intensity that was
contemplated in the Peripheral Area C and D and North Land Use plans.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: New
development and expansion or redevelopment of existing development in or near
residential areas should be compatible with existing uses and consistent with
adopted plans.
The development proposed in the Verdin PUD, via companion Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18, integrates several design considerations that are consistent with the adopted
plans for the area in addition to many of the design guidelines incorporated in the Desert
Maintenance Overlay of Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Desert Character Overlay Districts: See Background Item Nos. 3 and 4.
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan: See Background Item No. 5.
North Land Use Plan: See Background Item No. 6.
Page 811
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant RE-35 DCOD A, S-1 DCOD A
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve,
North RE-35 DCOD A
Vacant
West Vacant RE-35 DCOD A
East Vacant RE-35 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD B
South Vacant RE-35, S-1, RE-35 DCOD B
Background/Issues/Analysis
REQUEST
1. This is a request to rezone
636.24 acres located south of
Sonoran Desert Drive between
the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments from RE-35 DCOD A
(Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character
Overlay Districts, Desert
Maintenance Overlay Sub-
District A) and S-1 DCOD A
(Ranch or Farm Residence,
Desert Character Overlay
Districts, Desert Maintenance
Overlay Sub-District A) to RE-35
(Single-Family Residence
District, RE-35 DCOD B (Single-
Family Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay
Districts, Desert Maintenance
Overlay Sub-District B) and S-1
(Ranch or Farm Residence) for
a modification of the boundary of
Applicant Proposed Request, Zoning
the Desert Character Overlay Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix
Districts.
Page 812
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
This request is a companion case to
Text Amendment Case No. Z-TA-5-
18-2. If approved, Z-TA-5-18-2
would amend the Zoning Ordinance
language and maps in Section 653
whereas Z-75-18-2 would amend
the Zoning Map to reflect the
changes proposed.
Staff is recommending that a
smaller portion of the applicant’s
request be approved to be
consistent with the staff
recommendation for Z-TA-5-18.
The staff recommended change
area (155.06 acres) is shown to the
right.
Staff Recommendation, Zoning Sketch
Map, Source: City of Phoenix
2. In addition to Z-TA-5-18-2, there are two additional concurrent requests.
General Plan Amendment Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 and Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18-2 encompass the Verdin site (488 acres). General Plan Amendment
Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 seeks to modify the land use map designation and
removal from the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-
2 proposes to rezone the property to a Planned Unit Development district.
DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICTS
3. The Desert Character Overlay Districts, Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance,
was established in 2001 via Text Amendment Case No. Z-TA-3-99 with a
general purpose to implement the North Land Use Plan. The intent of the
overlay was to establish three character areas; Desert Maintenance, Rural
Desert and Suburban Desert, to define the nature of development while
maintaining undisturbed areas and to provide guidance for new development.
Standards for the Desert Maintenance Overlay District were included in the
original text amendment. Standards for the Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts have not been established.
Page 813
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
4. The overlay district contains distinct permitted uses and district standards for
Desert Maintenance Character Sub-Districts A and B in addition to design
guidelines applicable to both subdistricts. Single-family residential uses are
permitted in both subdistricts, with attached dwelling units only permitted in Sub-
District B.
District standards for the subdistricts include provisions designed to address lot
size, building envelope, height, setbacks, access, native landscaping and
treatment of washes. Design guidelines contain additional guidance on site
disturbance, native plant preservation, building and wall design, and access to
preserve areas, among others.
PERIPHERAL AREAS C AND D PLAN
5. In 1987, Phoenix City Council adopted the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan as an
amendment to the General Plan. The intent of the Peripheral Areas C and D
Plan was to serve as a guide for future land use and development in the
planning area, which consisted of approximately 111 square miles of largely
undeveloped land north of the Central Arizona Project canal in North Phoenix.
Within the Implementation Program section of the Plan, further refinement of the
general character elements was suggested prior to any formal ordinance
adoption.
NORTH LAND USE PLAN
6. The North Land Use Plan was adopted in 1996 to further the existing policies of
the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan. The Plan divided the planning area into
three character areas; Desert Preserve, Rural Desert and Suburban Residential,
and suggested that overlay districts be developed to provide clear development
standards in line with community desires. The Desert Preserve character area
aligns with the area included in the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts.
Page 814
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
North Land Use Plan Character Areas, Source: City of Phoenix
VERDIN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
7. The Verdin Planned Unit Development (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-
18-2) intregrates a number of design considerations based on Desert
Maintenane Character District standards. These include a sensitive transition
from open space to developed areas, conservation of washes and wildlife
habitats, and use of native plants.
In addition to the considerations based on overlay standards, the Planned Unit
Development includes enhanced standards for increased open space,
connectivity to adjacent preserve areas, a public trail and heightened landscape
standards developed in concert with the National Wildlife Federation.
These standards collectively ensure appropriate development within the
undisturbed desert context.
Page 815
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE ROADWAY ALIGNMENT HISTORY
8. The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan included discussion of a proposed
Northeast Outer Loop. The Northeast Outer Loop was a planned limited access
extension of the Northwest Loop from Interstate 17, north of the Union Hills and
Cave Buttes recreation areas, connecting to Dynamite Boulevard and traversing
east toward the city of Scottsdale. Proposed land uses for Area D (north of
Jomax Road) were contemplated based on proposed transportation
infrastructure, with a Village Core planned for the northwest corner of Cave
Creek Road and the Northeast Outer Loop / Dynamite Road alignment.
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan Land Use and Circulation, Source: City of Phoenix
9. By the North Land Use Plan’s adoption, plans for the Northeast Outer Loop had
ceased. As a result, the planned Core at Cave Creek and Dynamite Roads was
reduced in size and geared to function as a community service area instead of
an employment hub. Reduction in the planned commercial area at this location
contributed to the inclusion of the area west of Cave Creek Road into the Desert
Preserve character area identified in the plan. While no longer planned as a
limited access roadway, Dynamite Road was utilized as a dividing line between
a planned preservation buffer for the Cave Creek Wash to the north and a more
dense residental area adjacent to the Cave Buttes Recreational area to the
south.
10. While an east-west connection between Interstate 17 and northeast Phoenix
has been planned since 1987, public involvment efforts to refine the alignment
and type of roadway commenced in 2002. The final aligment for Sonoran
Parkway, adopted by Phoenix City Council in 2006 as a result of the
recommendation by the East Sonoran Parkway Alignment Committee, was
carefully designed to minimize the impact of the roadway on the future mountain
preserve area and intended to serve as a buffer between the preserve and
adjacent development. Construction of Sonoran Boulevard, now known as the
northern leg of Sonoran Desert Drive, began in 2010 and was completed in
2013.
Page 816
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
March 9, 2022
11. Due to the shift in the transportation corridor from the inception of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts in addition to the enhanced standards contained in
the Verdin PUD, the staff recommended modification to the Sub-District
boundaries and associated ordinance language is warranted.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
12. At the time the staff report was written, staff has received 82 letters in oppositon
and three letters in support of the overall proposal. Several letters in opposition
expressed concern with proposed overlay modification.
Findings
1. The rezoning request is a companion case to Z-TA-5-18-2 and would update the
Zoning Map boundaries for the changes proposed.
2. The proposal is consistent with changes in the transportation corridor alignment
since originally adopted.
3. The proposal maintains overlay district standards for the property north of
Sonoran Desert Drive, adjacent to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, and allows for
integration of appropriate design standards from the overlay in the Verdin
Planned Unit Development (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2).
Stipulations
None.
Writer
Samantha Keating
March 9, 2022
Team Leader
Joshua Bednarek
Exhibits
Proposed Sketch Map
Staff Recommendation Sketch Map
Aerial Sketch Map
Staff Recommendation Aerial Sketch Map
Page 817
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP *
Sub-District B
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 *
AN X 22 1
C-1 * S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 155.19 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 481.05 a.c.)
Z-75-18 REVISION DATES:
2/25/2022
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
S-1 ( 155.19 a.c.)
QUARTER SEC. NO.
R9, R10, Q9, RE-35 ( 236.97 a.c.)
636.24 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
TO: RE-35 DCOD Sub-District B ( 244.08 a.c.)
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
Q10, P9, P10
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 155, 529 N/A, 635
S-1, RE-35, RE-35 DCOD B 155, 260, 268 N/A, 313, 322
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18.mxd
Page 818
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 819
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP *
Sub-District B
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 *
AN X 22 1
C-1 * S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06mapservices@phoenix.gov
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 155.19 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 481.05 a.c.)
Z-75-18 REVISION DATES:
2/25/2022
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
S-1 ( 155.19 a.c.)
QUARTER SEC. NO.
R9, R10, Q9, RE-35 ( 236.97 a.c.)
636.24 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
TO: RE-35 DCOD Sub-District B ( 244.08 a.c.)
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
Q10, P9, P10
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 155, 529 N/A, 635
S-1, RE-35, RE-35 DCOD B 155, 260, 268 N/A, 313, 322
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18.mxd
Page 820
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06mapservices@phoenix.gov
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 821
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request From RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District) and S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence)
Proposed Use Modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries to modify a portion from Sub-District A to
Sub-District B and to remove a portion of property from
Sub-District A to allow for single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 822
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 823
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480 PUD. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately
build 1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan. She stated they are working
with the Deer Valley School District to come up with a solution to the school capacity
issue. She stated they are looking into the option of Cave Creek Schools.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, expressed several concerns:
- Traffic safety and cyclist safety on Sonoran Desert Drive.
- Public safety response time.
- Elimination of the night sky.
- Density is too high.
He then asked if the applicant has been in communication with the State Land
Department to see when the surrounding land will be opened for auction. Susan
Demmitt stated it won’t be within the next 5 years.
Jason Stokes, VPC member, asked where the closest fire station is located. Ms.
Demmitt stated Cave Creek and Dynamite.
Steve Tucker, VPC member, asked what would happen in the notch. Ms. Demmitt
states most likely residential. Mr. Tucker stated that the road improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive need to happen before development.
Julie Read, VPC member, asked how many homes are approved for Sonoran Gate. Ms.
Demmitt responded 255 homes.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 824
Shannon Simon, VPC member, inquired about the City’s timeline for the complete build
out of Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated the light pollution from Sonoran Gate isn’t as
bad as she thought. Ms. Simon then asked if all the neighborhoods will be gated. Ms.
Demmitt responded that some neighborhoods will be gated.
Julie Read, VPC member, stated she has concerns about the school capacity issue and
the fact that some of the students could be going to Cave Creek Schools. She stated
that a neighborhood elementary school builds a sense of community. Ms. Read asked
what the target market will be for this development. Ms. Demmitt states they are still
trying to identify the target. Julie Read asked how many children there are in Sonoran
Gate. A resident in the audience who lives in Sonoran Gate stated about 1 in 8 homes
have kids.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated that Sonoran Gate has a lot of amenities for kids
so there might not be a lot of kids right now but they can come. She stated she is
concerned with the school capacity. She said that it is at least a 20 to 25-minute drive to
the closest Cave Creek elementary school by car, so it would be even longer by bus.
Susan Demmitt stated that Taylor Morrison is committed to working with the school
districts to find a solution.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated she is concerned about school buses going in and
out of the neighborhood with the traffic and the speeds vehicles travel along Sonoran
Desert Drive. She also stated open enrollment can be deceiving because students can
get kicked out of the school.
The floor was open to public comment.
Michelle Kelly, resident, stated she was opposed to the request. She stated she is
concerned about the density. She stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills, which is lower
in density than the proposed project. She stated that Sonoran Foothills Elementary land
was gifted by the developer. She is concerned about police and fire response times.
She stated the project is too dense without the proper infrastructure in place.
Burt Bragin, resident, voiced his concerns about Sonoran Desert Drive and the current
traffic. He stated the connection to the 303 needs to be made before the project is
approved. He stated Sonoran Foothills has 1,300 homes and a school was gifted by the
developer. He stated this development has 6 to 7 times more homes that Sonoran Gate.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that Deer Valley Schools doesn’t want a school site at
this location.
Cynthia Wise, resident, stated she is in favor of the request. She said Taylor Morrison
did a great job with the current infrastructure improvements within Sonoran Gate.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated he is a park steward for the Apache Wash trailhead. He
stated this development would change the entire character of the area. He then asked
the developer how they will make it look like the preserve.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 825
J.R. Oliver, resident, stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills and has to wait a long time to
get out of her subdivision. She stated the connection to the 303 would help a lot.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that is more of a regional issue and to talk to the City’s
Street Transportation Department.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated she opposes the project and is a resident of Desert
Enclave. She said on the way to the meeting they had to wait until 56 cars went by to
turn out. She stated this development will have an adverse reaction on the desert
wildlife and preserve area. She stated this development is in contradiction of the
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
L. Chicchillo, resident, stated the current Taylor Morrison project looks like row houses.
He stated he lives in Desert Enclave and is worried about the traffic.
Spero Papos, resident, asked if the land had been purchased. The applicant confirmed
it had not been purchased yet. He inquired about traffic lights.
Julie Read, VPC member asked if the applicant has met with ADOT because they
would like to see more information about the project.
There was then a committee discussion about how Dove Valley Road, Cave Creek
Road and 27th Avenue all get flooded out in the monsoon storms.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, stated that the North Gateway minutes will be forwarded onto
the Desert View VPC with their packet so they are aware of the discussion that took
place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 826
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request From RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District) and S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence)
Proposed Use Modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries to modify a portion from Sub-District A to
Sub-District B and to remove a portion of property from
Sub-District A to allow for single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 827
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 828
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 829
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 830
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting April 2, 2019
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and to remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, gave a presentation of the case up to this point in time. She
stated that they started this process back in August. Ms. Demmitt went through the
General Plan history of the area, along with the Desert Character Overlay District
establishment. She summarized the infrastructure improvements that would be required
for the subdivision to be built. Ms. Demmitt went on to describe the comments the
developer is receiving from members of the public. The first comment was that the
property should stay S-1. Ms. Demmitt stated that staying S-1 would be one home per
acre. Having a subdivision with multiple sized lots/homes would be more affordable for
residents to live in proximity to the preserve.
The next comment from the public that was addressed is the condition of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Ms. Demmitt stated they are working with the City and the State Land
Department to evaluate. She went on to present pages form the 2002 council report that
indicated that at full capacity, Sonoran Desert Drive will be able to handle 50,000 cars a
day. The road was intended to be a major thoroughfare.
The next concern Ms. Demmitt addressed was the acquisition of Sonoran Preserve
Land. She went on to state that the MacEwen property has been privately held since the
1950’s. Taylor Morrison is agreeable to put a public trail through the center of the
property, adjacent to the wash corridor, to connect the preserve north and south of
Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated they will comply with the Sonoran Edge Treatment
Guidelines. Ms. Demmitt stated the City’s Park and Recreation Department is currently
looking at acquiring the land to the east of the MacEwen parcel for preserve.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 831
Lou Lagrave stated that he understands that Sonoran Desert Drive is intended to be a
six-lane arterial and the General Plan on the southern two-thirds of the property has the
land use designation that supports the proposed density but that he still has concerns.
Mr. Lagrave stated that he is concerned about the traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, how
the kids will get to school and the proposed lot sizes.
Susan Demmitt addressed Mr. Lagrave and stated that they are looking into what they
can do to alleviate some of the concerns regarding Sonoran Desert Drive but the
construction of the southern leg is 47 million dollars. She stated that the kids that live in
this development will have the option of attending either Deer Valley Schools or Cave
Creek Schools. She stated that both school districts will be providing bus service into
the neighborhood.
Jill Hankins asked if the Mesquite Wash is a 404 wash. Susan Demmitt referred to
Nguyen Lam on her development team. Mr. Lam stated they are disturbing less than an
acre and it is not within the 404-protected area. Ms. Hankins asked if there have been
any studies done regarding cultural items or protected species. Mr. Lam stated the
studies have been done and nothing was found.
Doug Dickson stated that the committee has received many emails opposition and not
one in support. Doug Dickson stated that they should talk to State Land about swapping
this parcel for a better suited piece of land. He asked if the applicant had explored this
option. Ms. Demmitt stated that the City hasn’t identified this piece of land as preserve
land, but they have not discussed a swap with State Land.
Steve Bowser stated that the committee has letters in front of them in opposition from
the Sierra Club and PMPC.
Steve Bowser read the cards in opposition that didn’t wish to speak.
The floor was opened for public comment.
Debra Sedillo Dugan, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic and views. She
said the signs were posted where no one could see them until the applicant recently
moved them.
John Furniss, resident, stated he is the Chair of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve
Committee for the Parks and Recreation Department. He said there should be a letter
from their committee to deny this project. He stated that they aren’t opposed to growth,
but this will set precedence and that we need to protect what he have.
Stacie Beute, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She has been a longtime
friend to the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and advises on committees. She said that
Taylor Morrison will be selling the homes with the added amenity of the proximity to the
preserve, but they are developing on the preserve. She stated she is concerned about
the impacts on the environment.
Amanda Farr, resident, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is currently a safe place to
cycle and run. If this development is approved, it will no longer be safe.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 832
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated that he is a Park Steward for the Phoenix Mountain
Preserve. He stated that he started the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group as an
advocacy group in response to the request. He stated that the proposal isn’t consistent
with the North Land Use Plan and the Desert View Character Plan. Mr. Kirkilas urged
the committee that if it doesn’t make sense, say no to the proposal.
Daniel Centilli, resident, stated that he is a Desert Ridge homeowner. He said the
current DCOD overlay prevents something like this proposal from happening. He stated
that the applicant is asking for exceptions to the law. He went on to state the preserve is
our legacy.
Patrick Havley, resident, thanked the committee. He stated he is concerned for the
safety of cyclists on Sonoran Desert Drive. He also stated this project won’t contribute
to the overall good of the City.
Gannon Burleigh, resident, said that he is opposed and has concerns about traffic,
schools and the impact on the preserve. He said that the project is irresponsible
development and that the removal of the overlay district that protects the preserve is
ridiculous.
Laura Jones, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated the development should be one acre lots to preserve the wildlife.
Patrick McMullen, resident, states that he is the President of the PMPC. He stated that
the Phoenix Mountain Preserve Council has been around since the 1970’s to preserve
the desert. He stated that PMPC is opposed to the request.
Mandy Fellows, resident, passed out a study from an ASU professor concerning the
ecological impact and flooding concerns in the area. She stated that this area is
downstream from three dams, with the closest dam being 1.5 miles away.
John Trojan, resident, stated he is opposed to the request with concerns about traffic,
pedestrian safety and allowing the developer to craft their own zoning standards.
Lainy Porter, resident, stated she moved to Arizona for pain management. She stated
that she trains for triathlons on Sonoran Desert Drive and is concerned about the
increase in traffic.
Claudia Wagner, resident, stated she is a trail runner and has concerns about the
danger the increased traffic with cause on Sonoran Desert Drive. She is also concerned
about the potential for flooding.
Heather Larson, resident, stated she is concerned about the increase in traffic and
pedestrian safety.
Tim Holt, resident, said that he moved to Phoenix from Seattle. He said this proposal is
just setting precedence and the next development will be even more dense. Mr. Holt
went on to state this project is about money and greed.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 833
Brett Scholar, resident, stated that he uses Sonoran Desert Drive to run and cycle. He
questioned the benefit the applicant will bring to the area. He stated that the property
should stay as it is currently zoned.
Lindsey Tillman, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She said that the City
needs to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
Susan Beccian, resident, stated that she is one of the only people that have received
letters about this case but didn’t receive one concerning the meeting tonight. She said
she is concerned that Gammage and Burnham isn’t being upfront with the community.
Cassandra Leone, resident, thanked her neighbors for coming out to oppose the zoning
request. She said she is concerned about pedestrian safety and the traffic on Sonoran
Desert Drive. She said she has read the PUD and has concerns about the sustainability
section.
Michelle Kelley, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. She commented
that just because a plan is 30 years old doesn’t mean it’s not a good plan. It means the
community and the planning department were visioning long term. This request doesn’t
comply with the Desert View Character Plan. Ms. Kelley went on to state that the school
is over capacity and there is no real plan from the applicant to resolve that issue. She
closed by stating the area should be preserved and the plans should not be changed.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. Ms. Pierce went on to
state that this project is going to be a financial burden on taxpayers. Even though the
applicant must pay to extend infrastructure, the taxpayers pay to maintain this
infrastructure that is being extended to only serve this subdivision.
Christine Severance, resident, stated that that the signs for the hearing were posted far
from the road so they couldn’t be read. She stated the applicant purchased the property
with the current zoning and that it shouldn’t be changed.
Karen Severance, resident, stated that the preserve means a lot to her. She urged the
committee to think about the ecosystem when they vote on this case at a later date.
Jennifer Severance, resident, stated that nature needs to have space. The edges of the
preserve are important.
Karl Mar, resident, stated that he is opposed to the request. He said that the
infrastructure can’t handle a development of this size.
Patty Killinger, resident, stated that she has been in the area since the 1970’s. She said
that the parcel’s adjacency to the Sonoran Preserve is important.
Anna Lewandowski, resident, stated she just found out about the project about two
weeks ago and came to the meeting to learn more about it. She said from listening to
the applicant’s presentation and the testimony of the public, it sounds like this
development is 10 years too soon. The current infrastructure and school systems can’t
handle the residents this development will generate.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 834
Mike Rooney, resident, stated this project is political. This development is not consistent
with the Desert View Character Plan.
Patricia Story, resident, stated that she is concerned for public safety in the areas. She
said the area already has an emergency response time issue.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 835
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 6, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and to remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately build
1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan.
Lou Lagrave had questions regarding the alignment of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated
it is a nice development in the wrong location and that there is no justification for the
density. He stated that according to the North Land Use Plan that this area is intended
to be 2 dwelling units per acre or less.
Rick Nowell clarified that the applicant would only be adding one lane in front of their
own development, not the entire length of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated it is a nice
project in the wrong place. He stated that Sanctuary at Desert Ridge is unsightly and he
doesn’t want to see that in this location.
Rick Powell asked which school district in which the property is located. Ms. Demmitt
said Deer Valley.
Steve Bowser asked how long the land has been privately held. Ms. Demmitt stated
since the 1950’s.
Ryan Schaefer asked if the developer was contributing to the Sonoran Desert Drive
alignment. Ms. Demmitt said the subdivision will be contributing to impact fees.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 836
Jill Hankins expressed concern about the safety of the cyclists on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated there needs to be an underpass and islands for the bikers.
Steve Bowser opened the meeting to public comment.
Richard Puleri, resident, stated he has concerns about the current traffic congestion on
Sonoran Desert Drive and inquired on when Sonoran Desert Drive will be expanded
and connected.
Michael Kaciemba, resident, stated he lives in Sonoran Foothills and that he has
concerns about the current traffic congestion. He stated that this project shouldn’t be
improved until the streets are expanded. He also addressed the school doesn’t have
capacity.
Public comment closed.
Reginald Younger said that Taylor Morrison expanded the roads with Sky Crossing.
Rick Powell states he has concerns about the school capacity.
Deanna Chew asked if residents would have a City of Phoenix address. Ms. Demmitt
stated she believes they will.
Rick Nowell asked if a traffic study has been done. Ms. Demmitt says it was recently
completed but has not been submitted to the City yet.
There was a brief committee discussion concerning the possibility of age restriction
subdivisions within the development.
Louis Lagrave stated he believes in land rights but this needs to come back with R1-10
zoning. Louis Lagrave also requested staff send out the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 837
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request From RE-35 DCOD A (Single-Family Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) and S-
1 DCOD A (Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District A)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
B (Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District B) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation to approve the
staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Z-TA-5-18-2, Item #6 – GPA-DSTV-18-
2, and Item #7 – Z-62-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 838
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 839
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 840
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Daniel Tome made a motion to approve Z-75-18-2, per
the staff recommendation to approve the staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2. The
motion was seconded by Committee member Michelle Ricart.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 841
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-75-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request From RE-35 DCOD A (Single-Family Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-District A) and S-
1 DCOD A (Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District A)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District), RE-35 DCOD
B (Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District B) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Deny as filed, approved per the staff recommendation to
approve the staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2
VPC Vote 7-4
VPC DISCUSSION:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 842
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 843
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 844
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 845
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – Z-75-18-2
Committee Member Warren made a motion to deny Z-75-18-2 as filed, and approve
per the staff recommendation. Vice Chair Lagrave seconded the motion.
VOTE
7-4, motion to deny as filed, approve per staff recommendation passed; Members Dean,
Israel, Kollar, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Members Hankins,
Nowell, Powell, and Reynolds against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 846
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-75-18-2
April 26, 2022
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date May 5, 2022
Request From RE-35 DCOD-A (Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character Overlay District, Sub-
District A) (10.25 acres) and S-1 DCOD-A
(Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character
Overlay District, Sub-District A) (144.81 acres)
Request To RE-35 (Single-Family Residence District)
(10.25 acres) and S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence) (144.81 acres)
Proposed Use Modify the boundary of the Desert Character
Overlay District to remove a portion from Sub-
District A
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Owner MacEwen Ranch, LLC and Arizona State Land
Department
Applicant/Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation Approval, per Addendum A
Summary
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended denial as filed, approval per the staff recommendation by a 4-
1 vote. The Desert View VPC heard this request on April 5, 2022, recommended denial
as filed, approval per the staff recommendation by a 7-4 vote.
The applicant’s original request was to rezone 636.24 acres located south of
Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th Street and 32nd Street alignments from RE-35
DCOD-A and S-1 DCOD-A to RE-35, RE-35 DCOD B, and S-1 for a modification of the
boundary of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
The applicant proposed to modify their request to align with the staff recommendation to
rezone 155.06 acres from RE-35 DCOD-A and S-1 DCOD-A to RE-35 and S-1.
Updated sketch maps are attached to reflect this change.
Page 847
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-75-18-2
April 26, 2022
Conclusion and Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Z-75-18-2 per Addendum A.
Exhibits
Sketch Map (2 pages)
Page 848
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06mapservices@phoenix.gov
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 849
C-1
OF TOWN O F
R1-10 PCD *
CAV E
PCD *
CREE K
7 TH AVE
CARE FREE
CAREFREE HWY Z-131-95
Z-131-95
STA TE R O U TE 7 4 (C A RE FR EE H IG H WAY )
S-1*
C-2 * AN X 33 4
Z- 1 25 -0 1
* Z- 3 5- 05
M ARI CO PA C-2
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
RE-35 *
AN X 18 1
CITY O F
AN X 33 4
R1-1 8
4 0 TH ST
Z- 3 5- 05
PRD *
Z- 3 1- 01 AN X 24 4
CO UN T Y Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
CP/GC P *
MARICOPA COUNTY
AN X 18 1
R1-18 PCD *
CP / G C P
*
Z- 9 0- 01
S-1
R1-1 8
PRD *
SCO TTSDA LE
5 2 ND ST
5 6 TH ST
S-1
Z-131-95
Z- 5 5- 95
MARICOPA
55TH ST
COUN TY S-1
R1-1 8 PRD * AN X 49 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1
C-1
*
S-1 MARICO PA
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 PRD *
R-2 *
R-2 *
Z- 5 5- 95
P ho en i x C it y L im it s P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 3 9- 04
Z- 3 8- 04
S-1 * RA
S-1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 3 8- 03
AN X 29 1
NC
Z- 5 5- 95
R1-1 8 * * COUNTY
R1-1 8 PRD
Z-112-08
Z- 4 -9 3
HO
R1-1 8 PRD*
R1 -1 8 PR D *
R1-1 8 PRD SP *
Z- 4 6- 98
Z- 5 5- 95
S-1 *
S-1
Z- 5 5- 95
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- S P - 21 -9 2
R1-1 8 PRD SP * R1-1 8 PRD *
PAL
Z- 5 5- 95 Z- 5 5- 95 P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1 *
S-1
O
S-1
AN X 39 5
Z- 8 8- 07
R-3 *
MA
Z-3 3- 12
RE-35 *
Z- 9 8- 92
R1-1 8 PRD *
DO DR
Z- 5 5- 95 S-1 S-1 S-1
Z- 1 73 -0 1 Z- 3 8- 03
S-1 AN X 26 2
AN X 29 1
Z- 4 5- 03
AN X 29 8
D RE-35
VE S-1 R1-18 *
S-1 R1-1 8 PRD * R1-1 8
KR
Z- 1 20 -9 6
PRD *
Z- 7 -9 4
53RD ST
R1-1 8 PRD
VA Z-110-05 Z-145-06
Z-6 8-04
LL S-1 *
PH O - 1 - 17 - - Z - 77 - 16
EE
S-2*
Z- 5 1- 06
EY
S-1 Z- 3 7- 03
S-2 *
ANX 358
AN X 29 0
ANX 445 Z-7 1-06
Z- 7 7- 16
S-1
AN X 34 0
Z- 7 6- 06
R1-18 PRD *
RE-35
Z- 9 3- 94
R1-1 8 *
RD
S-1
CR
Z- 7 -9 4
Z- 6 5- 03
Sub-District A
AN X 29 9
S-1
Z- 4 2- 99
AN X 20 5
Z-58-01 R1-1 0*
Z- 6 7- 15
R1-1 8*
S-1 * S-1
R1 -18 *
Z- 5 7- 15
Z- 2 -1 8 Z- 4 2- 00
C-2 SP
Z- 9 3- 97
AN X 22 8
CA
AN X 27 8
Z- 1 65 -0 2
C-2 SP *
C-2 SP AN X 26 4
RE-35
AN X 27 7 Z- 1 0- 02
RE-35 *
Z- 1 64 -0 2
R1-1 8*
C-2 *
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
C-1 * RE-35
AN X 26 4
Z- 1 04 -0 3
Z- 4 7- 16
Z- 1 0- 02 AN X 40 0 S- 1
PUD
VE
AN X 30 4 Z- 1 32 - 7
C-2 * Z- 9 3- 97
Z- 2 8- 14 AN X 6 4 C-2
Z- 1 61 -9 9
Z- 1 0- 02 C-2 AN X 21 6
AN X 21 8 Z- 1 77 -9 9
Z- 3 2- 00
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-1 8 PRD *
PCD * *
C-2 * Z-5 0-13
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
PC D
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
56TH ST
FH *
Z- 2 9- 02
RE -3 5 *
DE
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
RE-35
R1-6 * R1 -6 *
PCD
PC D
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 C-1 PCD *
Z- 2 37 -G -8 5 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 1 3- 01
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
R1-10 R
SE
RE-35 *
Z- 1 14 -9 5
AN X 17 9
Z-34-13
R-2 *
PC D
MARICO PA
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
R1-8 *
R-2 *
PCD
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5 PCD
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5 T RE- 35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
W
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37-A- 85
R-2 PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
RE -35
SP
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
IL R1-10
R1-1 8 *
Z- 4 1- 05
LO
C-O /G-O
PCD PCD *
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
Z- 2 37 -H - 8 5 Z-2 37-B- 85
R1 -1 0 *
C-2 * PC D
Z-2 37-A- 85 Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
DIXILETA DR
R1-10
C-2 PCD
DNS /W VR *
Z-2 37-G -85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85 C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
PCD *
Z-2 37-A - 85
C-2 *
C- 2
PCD*
Z-4 3- 98
PCD *
Z-2 37-D- 85
W
PK
Z-1 20-9 4
C-2
PCD
SP * PU D
Z- 43- 98
Z- 43- A - 98 R-3A Z-3 6 -1 2
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85 R1 -8
PC D *
COUNTY
S-1
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
C-2
PCD *
PCD *
Z-2 37-8 5
C- 2
PC D
SP *
Z-2 37-J- 85 C-2
PCD *
C-2
PCD *
Z-2 37 -G -8 5
R1-6
PCD *
RE-3 5
R1 -6
PCD *
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
W
R1 -8 *
PC D
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z-5 6-97
CP / GCP
PCD*
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-3 3-99
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-B- 85
R1-6
PCD *
Z-2 37-A- 85
Z-2 37-C- 85
Z-2 37-E- 85
Z- 2 37 -B - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -C - 8 5
Z- 2 37 -E - 8 5
Y R1 - 8 *
Z-SP-14 -89 R1 -10 *
44TH ST
Z- 1 05 -0 1
Z-6 5 -19
RE -35
42ND ST
CP / BP *
Z-1 08-0 7
S- 1*
AN X 44 4
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
R1-10 *
MARICOPA
R1-6 *
AN X 25 8
Z-1 2 2 -1 4
R1-6 *
Z- 6 -0 2
Z- 4 1- 96
Z-6 4-13 S-1
AN X 4 8 2
RE -35
R1 -6
PCD *
Z-2 37 -A -8 5
COUNTY
R1-10* Z-2 37 -C -8 5
RE-43
Z-2 37 -E -8 5
Z-6 9 -1 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
S-1
PCD
*
Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Phoenix City Limits
AN X 21 2
RH PCD
Z- 1 13 -9 9
R1-6 PCD *
P ho en i x C it y L im it s S-1
S-1 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 24 3
Z- 2 0- 01 R1-6
40TH ST
S-1 PCD * R1 -8 *
S-1 SP * Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
AN X 22 1 PRD
Z-109-97
AN X 22 1
S-2
Z- 2 9- 00
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 1 50 -0 1
Z- S P - 22 -0 3
AN X 35 1
S-1
PCD *
Z- 1 76 -0 5
7 TH AVE
R1-8 * C-2 * C-1 * S-1
Sub-District B
AN X 22 1
R1-1 8 PRD *
Z- 1 16 -0 7 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
DYNAMITE BLVD
Z- 2 9- 00 Z- 2 37 -A - 8 5
Z- 7 1- 03 AN X 17 3
R1-1 8 * S-1*
S-1
S-1 Z-5 6- 95 R1 -10 *
AN X 41 5
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 7 3- 16
AN X 50 8 Z- 4 5- 13
AN X 25 7
Z- 5 -0 2
Ph oe ni x C i ty L i m it s
DY NA M ITE B L VD
C-1 *
R1-18 *
Z-1 25 -9 9
PUD *
Z-2 2- 18
Z-61-06
R1-1 8 *
Z-7 3 -9 7
RE-35
CITY O F
MARICOPA
Pho enix City L imits
TATUM BLVD
Z-58-01 COUNTY
S-1 SO RE-35
N OR R1 -1 0 *
AN
Z- 1 18 -9 4
R1 -1 0 *
Z- 9 7- 94
Z- 1 18 -9 4
S-1*
SCO TTSDA LE
Z-2 6-09
D ES
Phoenix Ctiy Limits
ER
TD
R1-6 *
R1-1 0 * R1-6 * PCD Pho enix City L imits
S-1
PCD Z- 1 46 -9 7
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
RE-35
R
ANX 149 R1-8 *
JOMAX RD
R1 -8 * PCD
PC D
RE-35 *
Z- 9 9- 88
P ho en i x C it y L im it s
Z- 9 9- 88
R-2
PCD
*
PCD
* C-2 P CD *
S-1 *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88 Z- 9 9- 88
AN X 50 5
R-2 *
R1-10 *
Z- 9 9- 88
RE - 43
R1-6 *
RE - 43
PCD
S-1
PCD Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 1 46 -9 7
R-2 *
MARICOP A R1-6
PCD
*
PCD S-1
COUNTY R1-6
S-1
R1-6 * Z-61-06 R1-18 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88
* Z- 9 9- C - 88
PCD
R1-8 *
PC D * Z- 9 9- 88
R1-6 *
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- A - 88
R1-8
Z- 9 9- 88
*
PCD PCD *
Z-61-06
Z- 9 9- 88
Z- 9 9- 88 *
YEARLING RD Z-61-06
PC D
Z-61-06 Z-61-06
I
CAREFREE HWY
Z-75-18 DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD
1 0.5 0 1 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
FROM:
S-1 DCOD Sub-District A ( 144.81 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
9/29/2021 RE-35 DCOD Sub-District A ( 10.25 a.c.)
Z-75-18 (Per Staff Recommendation) 2/25/2022
REVISION DATES:
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO. S-1 ( 144.81 a.c.)
155.06 Acres Q51-35, Q51-36, Q52-32, Q52-33, R9, R10, Q9,
Q52-34, Q52-36, Q52-37, Q53-30,
Q53-31, Q53-32, Q53-33, Q53-34,
Q10, P9, P10 TO: RE-35 ( 10.25 a.c.)
Q54-30, Q54-31, Q54-32, Q54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD A, RE-35 DCOD A 145, 11 N/A, 13
S-1, RE-35 145, 11 N/A, 13
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-75-18_Staff_Rec.mxd
Page 850
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 6
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-75-18-2 (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-62-
18-2)
Location: South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and 32nd Street
alignments
From: RE-35 DCOD A and S-1 DCOD A
To: RE-35 and S-1
Acreage: Approximately 155.06
Proposal: Modify the boundary of the Desert Character Overlay District to remove a
portion from Sub-District A.
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Owner: MacEwan Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Denial as filed; approval of the staff recommended area in Z-TA-5-18-2.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 11/6/2018 Information only.
North Gateway 11/8/2018 Information only.
Desert View 4/2/2019 Information only.
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Denial as filed, approval per the staff recommendation. Vote: 7-4.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve Z-75-18-2, per the
Addendum A Staff Report.
Maker: Simon
Second: Johnson
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The rezoning request is a companion case to Z-TA-5-18-2 and would update the
Zoning Map boundaries for the changes proposed.
2. The proposal is consistent with changes in the transportation corridor alignment since
originally adopted.
Page 851
3. The proposal maintains overlay district standards for the property north of Sonoran
Desert Drive, adjacent to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, and allows for integration of
appropriate design standards from the overlay in the Verdin Planned Unit
Development (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2).
Stipulations:
None.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 852
Page 853
Page 854
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(CONTINUED FROM JUNE 1, 2022) - Public Hearing - Amend the Desert
Character Overlay District - Ordinance Adoption - Z-TA-5-18-2 (Ordinance G-
6993)
Request for a public hearing for a proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance,
Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2, to amend Chapter 6, Section 653 to modify the Desert
Character Overlay District boundaries between the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments.This is a companion case to GPA-DSTV -1-18-2, Z-75-18-2 and Z-62-18-2
and should be heard after Z-75-18-2.
Summary
The intent of this proposed text amendment is amend Chapter 6, Section 653 of the
Zoning Ordinance to modify the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay District.
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff recommendation: Approval, as shown in Exhibit A of the Staff Report.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 6,
2018, April 2, 2019, and Dec. 7, 2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village
Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 8, 2018 and Dec. 9, 2021, for information
only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 4-1.
The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 5, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-4.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on May 5, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, by a vote of 7-1.
Location
Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) boundaries between the 16th Street and
32nd Street alignments
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 28239 N. 23rd St.
Page 855
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 856
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CODE OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, PART II, CHAPTER 41, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX BY AMENDING
CHAPTER 6, SECTIONS 653.A. (GENERAL PURPOSE OF
DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICTS) AND 653.B.2.
(DESERT MAINTENANCE OVERLAY (SUB-DISTRICTS A AND B),
APPLICABILITY) TO MODIFY THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICT.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
That Chapter 6, Sections 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character
Overlay Districts) and 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A and B),
Applicability), is amended to modify the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay
District as follows:
SECTION 1. That Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert
Character Overlay Districts) is amended to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the
Desert Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to
define the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to
provide guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert. The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development. The key to successful
development within the three districts, which maintain interconnected undisturbed
desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual subdivision sites before laying out
the design of streets and lots.
Page 857
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area.
Subdistrict A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek
Wash and includes the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks,
Recreation and Library Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran
Preserve. With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and intensity of
residential development characterize this area. The Desert Maintenance Overlay
Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density allowed and the most
restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor
along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low
density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an
area to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas
and washes becomes possible.
***
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character Districts
Page 858
SECTION 2. That Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay
(Sub-Districts A and B), Applicability) is amended to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land
within the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A).
More specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to
all land within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the
Cave Creek Wash connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree
Highway to the 16th Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment
along the west, and the west boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending
south along the Black Mountain Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then
running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash to the 32nd Street alignment at the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
Page 859
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the
area bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation
Area along the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the
commercially designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road
and Dynamite Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the
Tatum Ranch Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and
Black Mountain Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning
Ordinance is required for all development, plus adherence to the design
guidelines and standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the
Zoning Ordinance.
***
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Page 860
Attachment B
Staff Report
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Application No. Z-TA-5-18-2: Amend Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance to modify
the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 as shown in
Exhibit A.
Purpose
The intent of this text amendment is to revise the applicability area and associated text
for the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay Districts to align
with transportation corridor updates since the adoption of the overlay district.
The Desert Maintenance
Overlay District contains use
standards and district
regulations that are contained in
two subdistricts, Sub-District A
and Sub-District B. Sub-District
A applies to land approximately
one mile in each direction from
Cave Creek Wash, from
Carefree Highway on the north
to the Dynamite Road alignment
on the south. Sub-District B
applies to land east of Sub-
District A and generally extends
to Cave Creek Road. The
current boundaries of the
subdistricts are shown to the left,
in pink (Sub-District A) and blue
(Sub-District B).
Desert Maintenance Overlay District Sub-Areas,
Source: Hilgart Wilson
Page 861
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 2
The applicant’s proposed
modification would modify the
boundaries of both Sub-District A
and Sub-District B. Sub-District A
standards are proposed to be
removed from the property south
of Sonoran Desert Drive and west
of Cave Creek Wash. Land south
of Sonoran Desert Drive and east
of Cave Creek Wash, currently in
Sub-District A, would become a
part of Sub-District B. The area
impacted by this proposed
modification is shown to the left.
Staff is recommending a smaller
modification that would only
remove Sub-District A standards
from an approximately 155.06-acre
Applicant Proposed Desert Maintenance Overlay portion of the original request as
District Modifications, Source: Hilgart Wilson depicted on the left.
Minor text updates to the overlay
are also proposed to provide
consistency with the geographic
modifications of the subdistrict
areas.
There are three additional
concurrent requests. Rezoning
Case No. Z-75-18-2 is a
companion rezoning case to Z-TA-
5-18-2 and would modify the
boundary of the Desert Character
Overlay District on the city’s
Zoning Map for 155.06 acres.
General Plan Amendment Case
No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 and
Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2
encompass the Verdin site (488
acres). General Plan Amendment
Staff Recommended Desert Maintenance Overlay Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
District Modifications, Source: Hilgart Wilson
seeks to modify the land use map
Page 862
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 3
designation and removal from the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18-2 proposes to rezone the property to a Planned Unit Development district.
Background: Desert Character Overlay Districts
The Desert Character Overlay Districts, Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance, was
established in 2001 via Text Amendment Case No. Z-TA-3-99 with a general purpose to
implement the North Land Use Plan. The intent of the overlay was to establish three
character districts; Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert, to define
the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas and to provide guidance
for new development. Standards for the Desert Maintenance Overlay District were
included in the original text amendment. Standards for the Rural Desert and Suburban
Desert Overlay Districts have not been established.
The overlay district contains distinct permitted uses and district standards for Sub-
Districts A and B in addition to design guidelines applicable to both subdistricts. Single-
family residential uses are permitted in both subdistricts, with attached dwelling units
only permitted in Sub-District B. Select commercial uses are permitted in Sub-District
B, subject to obtaining a Special Permit.
District standards for the subdistricts include provisions designed to address lot size,
building envelope, height, setbacks, access, native landscaping and treatment of
washes. Design guidelines contain additional guidance on site disturbance, native plant
preservation, building and wall design, and access to preserve areas, among others.
Background: Peripheral Areas C and D and North Land Use Plans
In 1987, Phoenix City Council adopted the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan as an
amendment to the General Plan. The intent of the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was
to serve as a guide for future land use and development in the planning area, which
consisted of approximately 111 square miles of largely undeveloped land north of the
Central Arizona Project canal in North Phoenix. Within the Implementation Program
section of the Plan, further refinement of the general character elements was suggested
prior to any formal ordinance adoption.
The North Land Use Plan was adopted in 1996 to further the existing policies of the
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan. The Plan divided the planning area into three character
areas, Desert Preserve, Rural Desert and Suburban Residential, and suggested that
overlay districts be developed to provide clear development standards in line with
community desires. The Desert Preserve character area aligns with the area included
in the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
Page 863
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 4
North Land Use Plan Character Areas, Source: City of Phoenix
Background: Verdin Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposal
The Verdin PUD (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2) intregrates a number of
design considerations based on Desert Maintenane Character District standards.
These include a sensitive transition from open space to developed areas, conservation
of washes and wildlife habitats, and use of native plants.
In addition to the considerations based on overlay standards, the Planned Unit
Development includes enhanced standards for increased open space, connectivity to
adjacent preserve areas, a public trail and heightened landscape standards developed
in concert with the National Wildlife Federation.
Because these standards do not apply to property outside of the Verdin PUD request
area, staff is recommending a smaller modification to the applicability area proposed by
the applicant.
Background: Northeast Outer Loop and Sonoran Desert Drive
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan included discussion of a proposed Northeast Outer
Loop. The Northeast Outer Loop was a planned limited access extension of the
Northwest Loop from Interstate 17, north of the Union Hills and Cave Buttes recreation
areas, connecting to Dynamite Boulevard and traversing east toward the city of
Page 864
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 5
Scottsdale. Proposed land uses for Area D (north of Jomax Road) were contemplated
based on proposed transportation infrastructure, with a Village Core planned for the
northwest corner of Cave Creek Road and the Northeast Outer Loop / Dynamite Road
alignment.
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan Land Use and Circulation, Source: City of Phoenix
By the North Land Use Plan’s adoption, plans for the Northeast Outer Loop had ceased.
As a result, the planned Core at Cave Creek and Dynamite Roads was reduced in size
and geared to function as a community service area instead of an employment hub.
Reduction in the planned commercial area at this location contributed to the inclusion of
the area west of Cave Creek Road into the Desert Preserve character area identified in
the plan. While no longer planned as a limited access roadway, Dynamite Road was
utilized as a dividing line between a planned preservation buffer for the Cave Creek
Wash to the north and a more dense residental area adjcent to the Cave Buttes
Recreational area to the south.
While an east-west connection between Interstate 17 and northeast Phoenix has been
planned since 1987, public involvment efforts to refine the alignment and type of
roadway commenced in 2002. The final aligment for Sonoran Parkway, adopted by
Phoenix City Council in 2006 as a result of the recommendation by the East Sonoran
Parkway Alignment Committee, was carefully designed to minimize the impact of the
roadway on the future mountain preserve area and intended to serve as a buffer
between the preserve and adjacent development. Construction of Sonoran Boulevard,
now known as the northern leg of Sonoran Desert Drive, began in 2010 and was
completed in 2013.
Staff Analysis
The boundary of the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts was derived from the Desert Preserve character area outlined in the North
Land Use Plan. This preservation area distinguished between the planned preserve
area north of the then Dynamite Road alignment and the area adjacent to the Cave
Page 865
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 6
Buttes Recreational area, which was slated for additional residential development.
Subsequent to the approval of the Desert Character Overlay Districts, the roadway
connecting Interstate 17 to Cave Creek Road was further evaluated and realigned as
the currently constructed Sonoran Desert Drive.
In addition, the companion Verdin PUD request contains development standards and
design guidelines that are intended to provide consistency with Desert Maintenance
Overlay standards and the general intent of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
These standards collectively ensure appropriate development within the undisturbed
desert context.
Due to the shift in the transportation corridor from the inception of the Desert Character
Overlay Districts in addition to the enhanced standards contained in the Verdin PUD,
the staff recommended modification to the Sub-District boundaries and associated
ordinance language is warranted.
Conclusion
Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Writer
S. Keating
March 9, 2022
Exhibits
Exhibit A: Proposed Language (4 pages)
Exhibit B: Text Amendment Sketch Map
Exhibit C: Staff Recommendation Text Amendment Sketch Map
Page 866
EXHIBIT A
Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2:
Modification of Boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay Districts
Proposed Language:
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay
Districts) to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the
Desert Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to
define the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to
provide guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert. The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development. The key to successful
development within the three districts, which maintain interconnected undisturbed
desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual subdivision sites before laying out
the design of streets and lots.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area.
Subdistrict A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek
Wash and includes the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks,
Recreation and Library Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran
Preserve. With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and intensity of
residential development characterize this area. The Desert Maintenance Overlay
Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density allowed and the most
restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor
along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low
density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an
area to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas
and washes becomes possible.
***
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character DistrictS
Page 867
Page 868
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A
and B), Applicability) to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land
within the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A).
More specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to
all land within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the
Cave Creek Wash connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree
Highway to the 16th Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment
along the west, and the west boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending
south along the Black Mountain Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then
Page 869
running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash to the 32nd Street alignment at the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the
area bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation
Area along the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the
commercially designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road
and Dynamite Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the
Tatum Ranch Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and
Black Mountain Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning
Ordinance is required for all development, plus adherence to the design
guidelines and standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the
Zoning Ordinance.
***
Page 870
Text Amendment
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-75-18 ACRES: 6222.46 +/-
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
EXISTING:
DCOD A ( 4681.97 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character A
Overlay District D
KR
Desert Maintenance Character B
E EE
Overlay District SO CR
N OR
AN AV
E
DE NC
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
PROPOSED CHANGE:
DCOD A ( 3977.29 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2245.17 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character
A Overlay District D
Desert Maintenance Character KR
B Overlay District CR
E EE
SO
NO AV
RA E
N NC
DE
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
Page 871
Text Amendment
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-75-18 ACRES: 6465.72 +/-
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
EXISTING:
DCOD A ( 4681.97 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character A
Overlay District D
KR
Desert Maintenance Character B
Overlay District E EE
SO CR
N OR
AN AV
E
DE NC
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
PROPOSED CHANGE (Per Staff Recommendation):
DCOD A ( 4463.85 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character
A Overlay District D
Desert Maintenance Character KR
B Overlay District CR
E EE
SO
NO AV
RA E
N NC
DE
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
Page 872
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries between the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 873
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 874
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 875
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 876
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting April 2, 2019
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, gave a presentation of the case up to this point in time. She
stated that they started this process back in August. Ms. Demmitt went through the
General Plan history of the area, along with the Desert Character Overlay District
establishment. She summarized the infrastructure improvements that would be required
for the subdivision to be built. Ms. Demmitt went on to describe the comments the
developer is receiving from members of the public. The first comment was that the
property should stay S-1. Ms. Demmitt stated that staying S-1 would be one home per
acre. Having a subdivision with multiple sized lots/homes would be more affordable for
residents to live in proximity to the preserve.
The next comment from the public that was addressed is the condition of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Ms. Demmitt stated they are working with the City and the State Land
Department to evaluate. She went on to present pages form the 2002 council report that
indicated that at full capacity, Sonoran Desert Drive will be able to handle 50,000 cars a
day. The road was intended to be a major thoroughfare.
The next concern Ms. Demmitt addressed was the acquisition of Sonoran Preserve
Land. She went on to state that the MacEwen property has been privately held since the
1950’s. Taylor Morrison is agreeable to put a public trail through the center of the
property, adjacent to the wash corridor, to connect the preserve north and south of
Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated they will comply with the Sonoran Edge Treatment
Guidelines. Ms. Demmitt stated the City’s Park and Recreation Department is currently
looking at acquiring the land to the east of the MacEwen parcel for preserve.
Lou Lagrave stated that he understands that Sonoran Desert Drive is intended to be a
six-lane arterial and the General Plan on the southern two-thirds of the property has the
land use designation that supports the proposed density but that he still has concerns.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 877
Mr. Lagrave stated that he is concerned about the traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, how
the kids will get to school and the proposed lot sizes.
Susan Demmitt addressed Mr. Lagrave and stated that they are looking into what they
can do to alleviate some of the concerns regarding Sonoran Desert Drive but the
construction of the southern leg is 47 million dollars. She stated that the kids that live in
this development will have the option of attending either Deer Valley Schools or Cave
Creek Schools. She stated that both school districts will be providing bus service into
the neighborhood.
Jill Hankins asked if the Mesquite Wash is a 404 wash. Susan Demmitt referred to
Nguyen Lam on her development team. Mr. Lam stated they are disturbing less than an
acre and it is not within the 404-protected area. Ms. Hankins asked if there have been
any studies done regarding cultural items or protected species. Mr. Lam stated the
studies have been done and nothing was found.
Doug Dickson stated that the committee has received many emails opposition and not
one in support. Doug Dickson stated that they should talk to State Land about swapping
this parcel for a better suited piece of land. He asked if the applicant had explored this
option. Ms. Demmitt stated that the City hasn’t identified this piece of land as preserve
land, but they have not discussed a swap with State Land.
Steve Bowser stated that the committee has letters in front of them in opposition from
the Sierra Club and PMPC.
Steve Bowser read the cards in opposition that didn’t wish to speak.
The floor was opened for public comment.
Debra Sedillo Dugan, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic and views. She
said the signs were posted where no one could see them until the applicant recently
moved them.
John Furniss, resident, stated he is the Chair of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve
Committee for the Parks and Recreation Department. He said there should be a letter
from their committee to deny this project. He stated that they aren’t opposed to growth,
but this will set precedence and that we need to protect what he have.
Stacie Beute, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She has been a longtime
friend to the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and advises on committees. She said that
Taylor Morrison will be selling the homes with the added amenity of the proximity to the
preserve, but they are developing on the preserve. She stated she is concerned about
the impacts on the environment.
Amanda Farr, resident, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is currently a safe place to
cycle and run. If this development is approved, it will no longer be safe.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated that he is a Park Steward for the Phoenix Mountain
Preserve. He stated that he started the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group as an
advocacy group in response to the request. He stated that the proposal isn’t consistent
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 878
with the North Land Use Plan and the Desert View Character Plan. Mr. Kirkilas urged
the committee that if it doesn’t make sense, say no to the proposal.
Daniel Centilli, resident, stated that he is a Desert Ridge homeowner. He said the
current DCOD overlay prevents something like this proposal from happening. He stated
that the applicant is asking for exceptions to the law. He went on to state the preserve is
our legacy.
Patrick Havley, resident, thanked the committee. He stated he is concerned for the
safety of cyclists on Sonoran Desert Drive. He also stated this project won’t contribute
to the overall good of the City.
Gannon Burleigh, resident, said that he is opposed and has concerns about traffic,
schools and the impact on the preserve. He said that the project is irresponsible
development and that the removal of the overlay district that protects the preserve is
ridiculous.
Laura Jones, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated the development should be one acre lots to preserve the wildlife.
Patrick McMullen, resident, states that he is the President of the PMPC. He stated that
the Phoenix Mountain Preserve Council has been around since the 1970’s to preserve
the desert. He stated that PMPC is opposed to the request.
Mandy Fellows, resident, passed out a study from an ASU professor concerning the
ecological impact and flooding concerns in the area. She stated that this area is
downstream from three dams, with the closest dam being 1.5 miles away.
John Trojan, resident, stated he is opposed to the request with concerns about traffic,
pedestrian safety and allowing the developer to craft their own zoning standards.
Lainy Porter, resident, stated she moved to Arizona for pain management. She stated
that she trains for triathlons on Sonoran Desert Drive and is concerned about the
increase in traffic.
Claudia Wagner, resident, stated she is a trail runner and has concerns about the
danger the increased traffic with cause on Sonoran Desert Drive. She is also concerned
about the potential for flooding.
Heather Larson, resident, stated she is concerned about the increase in traffic and
pedestrian safety.
Tim Holt, resident, said that he moved to Phoenix from Seattle. He said this proposal is
just setting precedence and the next development will be even more dense. Mr. Holt
went on to state this project is about money and greed.
Brett Scholar, resident, stated that he uses Sonoran Desert Drive to run and cycle. He
questioned the benefit the applicant will bring to the area. He stated that the property
should stay as it is currently zoned.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 879
Lindsey Tillman, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She said that the City
needs to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
Susan Beccian, resident, stated that she is one of the only people that have received
letters about this case but didn’t receive one concerning the meeting tonight. She said
she is concerned that Gammage and Burnham isn’t being upfront with the community.
Cassandra Leone, resident, thanked her neighbors for coming out to oppose the zoning
request. She said she is concerned about pedestrian safety and the traffic on Sonoran
Desert Drive. She said she has read the PUD and has concerns about the sustainability
section.
Michelle Kelley, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. She commented
that just because a plan is 30 years old doesn’t mean it’s not a good plan. It means the
community and the planning department were visioning long term. This request doesn’t
comply with the Desert View Character Plan. Ms. Kelley went on to state that the school
is over capacity and there is no real plan from the applicant to resolve that issue. She
closed by stating the area should be preserved and the plans should not be changed.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. Ms. Pierce went on to
state that this project is going to be a financial burden on taxpayers. Even though the
applicant must pay to extend infrastructure, the taxpayers pay to maintain this
infrastructure that is being extended to only serve this subdivision.
Christine Severance, resident, stated that that the signs for the hearing were posted far
from the road so they couldn’t be read. She stated the applicant purchased the property
with the current zoning and that it shouldn’t be changed.
Karen Severance, resident, stated that the preserve means a lot to her. She urged the
committee to think about the ecosystem when they vote on this case at a later date.
Jennifer Severance, resident, stated that nature needs to have space. The edges of the
preserve are important.
Karl Mar, resident, stated that he is opposed to the request. He said that the
infrastructure can’t handle a development of this size.
Patty Killinger, resident, stated that she has been in the area since the 1970’s. She said
that the parcel’s adjacency to the Sonoran Preserve is important.
Anna Lewandowski, resident, stated she just found out about the project about two
weeks ago and came to the meeting to learn more about it. She said from listening to
the applicant’s presentation and the testimony of the public, it sounds like this
development is 10 years too soon. The current infrastructure and school systems can’t
handle the residents this development will generate.
Mike Rooney, resident, stated this project is political. This development is not consistent
with the Desert View Character Plan.
Patricia Story, resident, stated that she is concerned for public safety in the areas. She
said the area already has an emergency response time issue.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 880
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 6, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately build
1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan.
Lou Lagrave had questions regarding the alignment of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated
it is a nice development in the wrong location and that there is no justification for the
density. He stated that according to the North Land Use Plan that this area is intended
to be 2 dwelling units per acre or less.
Rick Nowell clarified that the applicant would only be adding one lane in front of their
own development, not the entire length of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated it is a nice
project in the wrong place. He stated that Sanctuary at Desert Ridge is unsightly and he
doesn’t want to see that in this location.
Rick Powell asked which school district in which the property is located. Ms. Demmitt
said Deer Valley.
Steve Bowser asked how long the land has been privately held. Ms. Demmitt stated
since the 1950’s.
Ryan Schaefer asked if the developer was contributing to the Sonoran Desert Drive
alignment. Ms. Demmitt said the subdivision will be contributing to impact fees.
Jill Hankins expressed concern about the safety of the cyclists on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated there needs to be an underpass and islands for the bikers.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 881
Steve Bowser opened the meeting to public comment.
Richard Puleri, resident, stated he has concerns about the current traffic congestion on
Sonoran Desert Drive and inquired on when Sonoran Desert Drive will be expanded
and connected.
Michael Kaciemba, resident, stated he lives in Sonoran Foothills and that he has
concerns about the current traffic congestion. He stated that this project shouldn’t be
improved until the streets are expanded. He also addressed the school doesn’t have
capacity.
Public comment closed.
Reginald Younger said that Taylor Morrison expanded the roads with Sky Crossing.
Rick Powell states he has concerns about the school capacity.
Deanna Chew asked if residents would have a City of Phoenix address. Ms. Demmitt
stated she believes they will.
Rick Nowell asked if a traffic study has been done. Ms. Demmitt says it was recently
completed but has not been submitted to the City yet.
There was a brief committee discussion concerning the possibility of age restriction
subdivisions within the development.
Louis Lagrave stated he believes in land rights but this needs to come back with R1-10
zoning. Louis Lagrave also requested staff send out the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 882
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries between the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 883
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 884
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480 PUD. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately
build 1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan. She stated they are working
with the Deer Valley School District to come up with a solution to the school capacity
issue. She stated they are looking into the option of Cave Creek Schools.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, expressed several concerns:
- Traffic safety and cyclist safety on Sonoran Desert Drive.
- Public safety response time.
- Elimination of the night sky.
- Density is too high.
He then asked if the applicant has been in communication with the State Land
Department to see when the surrounding land will be opened for auction. Susan
Demmitt stated it won’t be within the next 5 years.
Jason Stokes, VPC member, asked where the closest fire station is located. Ms.
Demmitt stated Cave Creek and Dynamite.
Steve Tucker, VPC member, asked what would happen in the notch. Ms. Demmitt
states most likely residential. Mr. Tucker stated that the road improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive need to happen before development.
Julie Read, VPC member, asked how many homes are approved for Sonoran Gate. Ms.
Demmitt responded 255 homes.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 885
Shannon Simon, VPC member, inquired about the City’s timeline for the complete build
out of Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated the light pollution from Sonoran Gate isn’t as
bad as she thought. Ms. Simon then asked if all the neighborhoods will be gated. Ms.
Demmitt responded that some neighborhoods will be gated.
Julie Read, VPC member, stated she has concerns about the school capacity issue and
the fact that some of the students could be going to Cave Creek Schools. She stated
that a neighborhood elementary school builds a sense of community. Ms. Read asked
what the target market will be for this development. Ms. Demmitt states they are still
trying to identify the target. Julie Read asked how many children there are in Sonoran
Gate. A resident in the audience who lives in Sonoran Gate stated about 1 in 8 homes
have kids.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated that Sonoran Gate has a lot of amenities for kids
so there might not be a lot of kids right now but they can come. She stated she is
concerned with the school capacity. She said that it is at least a 20 to 25-minute drive to
the closest Cave Creek elementary school by car, so it would be even longer by bus.
Susan Demmitt stated that Taylor Morrison is committed to working with the school
districts to find a solution.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated she is concerned about school buses going in and
out of the neighborhood with the traffic and the speeds vehicles travel along Sonoran
Desert Drive. She also stated open enrollment can be deceiving because students can
get kicked out of the school.
The floor was open to public comment.
Michelle Kelly, resident, stated she was opposed to the request. She stated she is
concerned about the density. She stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills, which is lower
in density than the proposed project. She stated that Sonoran Foothills Elementary land
was gifted by the developer. She is concerned about police and fire response times.
She stated the project is too dense without the proper infrastructure in place.
Burt Bragin, resident, voiced his concerns about Sonoran Desert Drive and the current
traffic. He stated the connection to the 303 needs to be made before the project is
approved. He stated Sonoran Foothills has 1,300 homes and a school was gifted by the
developer. He stated this development has 6 to 7 times more homes that Sonoran Gate.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that Deer Valley Schools doesn’t want a school site at
this location.
Cynthia Wise, resident, stated she is in favor of the request. She said Taylor Morrison
did a great job with the current infrastructure improvements within Sonoran Gate.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated he is a park steward for the Apache Wash trailhead. He
stated this development would change the entire character of the area. He then asked
the developer how they will make it look like the preserve.
J.R. Oliver, resident, stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills and has to wait a long time to
get out of her subdivision. She stated the connection to the 303 would help a lot.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 886
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that is more of a regional issue and to talk to the City’s
Street Transportation Department.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated she opposes the project and is a resident of Desert
Enclave. She said on the way to the meeting they had to wait until 56 cars went by to
turn out. She stated this development will have an adverse reaction on the desert
wildlife and preserve area. She stated this development is in contradiction of the
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
L. Chicchillo, resident, stated the current Taylor Morrison project looks like row houses.
He stated he lives in Desert Enclave and is worried about the traffic.
Spero Papos, resident, asked if the land had been purchased. The applicant confirmed
it had not been purchased yet. He inquired about traffic lights.
Julie Read, VPC member asked if the applicant has met with ADOT because they
would like to see more information about the project.
There was then a committee discussion about how Dove Valley Road, Cave Creek
Road and 27th Avenue all get flooded out in the monsoon storms.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, stated that the North Gateway minutes will be forwarded onto
the Desert View VPC with their packet so they are aware of the discussion that took
place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 887
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation to amend the
applicability area and associated text for the Desert
Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #5 – Z-75-18-2, Item #6 – GPA-DSTV-18-2,
and Item #7 – Z-62-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 888
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 889
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 890
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Michelle Ricart made a motion to approve Z-TA-5-18-
2, per the staff recommendation to amend the applicability area and associated text for
the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay Districts as shown in
Exhibit A of the staff report. The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Shannon Simon.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 891
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation to amend the
applicability area and associated text for the Desert
Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report
VPC Vote 7-4
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 892
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 893
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 894
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 895
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – Z-TA-5-18-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to recommend approval of Z-TA-5-18-2, per the
staff recommendation. Committee Member Santoro seconded the motion.
VOTE
7-4, motion to recommend approval, per staff recommendation, passed; Members
Dean, Israel, Kollar, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Members Hankins,
Nowell, Powell, and Reynolds against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 896
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-TA-5-18-2
(Modification to the Desert Character Overlay District)
April 26, 2022
Application No. Z-TA-5-18-2: Amend Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance to modify
the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay District.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 per Addendum A.
The applicant’s original request was to modify the boundaries of both Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. Sub-District A standards are proposed to be removed from the area
south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave Creek Wash. Land south of Sonoran
Desert Drive and east of Cave Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become a
part of Sub-District B.
The applicant proposed to modify their request to align with the staff recommendation to
remove Sub-District A standards for approximately 155.06 acres of the Desert
Character Overlay District.
The associated text updates and sketch maps are attached to reflect this update.
Exhibits
Proposed Language (4 pages)
Sketch Map
Page 897
EXHIBIT A
Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2:
Modification of Boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay Districts
Proposed Language:
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay
Districts) to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the
Desert Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to
define the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to
provide guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert. The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development. The key to successful
development within the three districts, which maintain interconnected undisturbed
desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual subdivision sites before laying out
the design of streets and lots.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area.
Subdistrict A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek
Wash and includes the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks,
Recreation and Library Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran
Preserve. With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and intensity of
residential development characterize this area. The Desert Maintenance Overlay
Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density allowed and the most
restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor
along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low
density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an
area to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas
and washes becomes possible.
***
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character DistrictS
Page 898
Page 899
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A
and B), Applicability) to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land
within the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A).
More specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to
all land within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the
Cave Creek Wash connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree
Highway to the 16th Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment
along the west, and the west boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending
south along the Black Mountain Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then
Page 900
running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash to the 32nd Street alignment at the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the
area bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation
Area along the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the
commercially designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road
and Dynamite Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the
Tatum Ranch Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and
Black Mountain Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning
Ordinance is required for all development, plus adherence to the design
guidelines and standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the
Zoning Ordinance.
***
Page 901
Text Amendment
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-TA-5-18-2 ACRES: 6465.72 +/-
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
EXISTING:
DCOD A ( 4681.97 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character A
Overlay District D
KR
Desert Maintenance Character B
Overlay District E EE
SO CR
N OR
AN AV
E
DE NC
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
PROPOSED CHANGE:
DCOD A ( 4526.91 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character
A Overlay District D
Desert Maintenance Character KR
B Overlay District CR
E EE
SO
NO AV
RA E
N NC
DE
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
Page 902
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and Z-62-
18-2)
Location: South of Sonoran Desert Drive between 16th and 32nd Street alignments
Proposal: Amend Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance to modify the boundaries of
the Desert Character Overlay District.
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Owner: MacEwan Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in Exhibit A.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
North Gateway 11/8/2018 Information only.
Desert View 11/6/2018 Information only.
Desert View 4/2/2019 Information only.
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 7-4.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve Z-TA-5-18-2, per the
Addendum A Staff Report.
Maker: Simon
Second: Mangum
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The boundary of the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts was derived from the Desert Preserve character area outlined in the North
Land Use Plan. This preservation area distinguished between the planned preserve
area north of the then Dynamite Road alignment and the area adjacent to the Cave
Buttes Recreational area, which was slated for additional residential development.
Subsequent to the approval of the Desert Character Overlay Districts, the roadway
connecting Interstate 17 to Cave Creek Road was further evaluated and realigned as
the currently constructed Sonoran Desert Drive.
Page 903
2. The companion Verdin PUD request contains development standards and
design guidelines that are intended to provide consistency with Desert Maintenance
Overlay standards and the general intent of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
These standards collectively ensure appropriate development within the undisturbed
desert context.
3. Due to the shift in the transportation corridor from the inception of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts in addition to the enhanced standards contained in the
Verdin PUD, the staff recommended modification to the Sub-District boundaries and
associated ordinance language is warranted.
Proposed Language:
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts)
to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to define the nature
of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to provide guidance for new
development to occur within the context of the fragile undisturbed desert. The Desert
Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert Overlay Districts are designed in
response to existing undisturbed conditions and pressures placed on them by increased
development. The key to successful development within the three districts, which
maintain interconnected undisturbed desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual
subdivision sites before laying out the design of streets and lots.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area. Subdistrict
A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek Wash and includes
the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks, Recreation and Library
Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran Preserve. With the many
washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition crossing this area, Subdistrict A is
intended to provide a transition from the preserve to areas with greater density. A very
low density, scale and intensity of residential development characterize this area. The
Desert Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to
density allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas
and the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by
low density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an area
to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas and
washes becomes possible.
***
Page 904
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character DistrictS
Page 905
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A and B),
Applicability) to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land within
the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A). More
specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to all land
within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash
connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree Highway to the 16th Street
alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the west, and the west
boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending south along the Black Mountain
Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash
to the 32nd Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
Page 906
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the area
bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation Area along
the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the commercially
designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Dynamite
Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the Tatum Ranch
Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and Black Mountain
Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning Ordinance is
required for all development, plus adherence to the design guidelines and
standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the Zoning Ordinance.
***
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 907
Page 908
Page 909
Report
Character Overlay District - Ordinance Adoption - Z-TA-5-18-2 (Ordinance G-
6993)
Request for a public hearing for a proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance,
Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2, to amend Chapter 6, Section 653 to modify the Desert
Character Overlay District boundaries between the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments.This is a companion case to GPA-DSTV -1-18-2, Z-75-18-2 and Z-62-18-2
and should be heard after Z-75-18-2.
Summary
The intent of this proposed text amendment is amend Chapter 6, Section 653 of the
Zoning Ordinance to modify the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay District.
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff recommendation: Approval, as shown in Exhibit A of the Staff Report.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 6,
2018, April 2, 2019, and Dec. 7, 2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village
Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 8, 2018 and Dec. 9, 2021, for information
only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 4-1.
The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 5, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-4.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on May 5, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, by a vote of 7-1.
Location
Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) boundaries between the 16th Street and
32nd Street alignments
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 28239 N. 23rd St.
Page 855
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 856
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE CODE OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, PART II, CHAPTER 41, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX BY AMENDING
CHAPTER 6, SECTIONS 653.A. (GENERAL PURPOSE OF
DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICTS) AND 653.B.2.
(DESERT MAINTENANCE OVERLAY (SUB-DISTRICTS A AND B),
APPLICABILITY) TO MODIFY THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICT.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
That Chapter 6, Sections 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character
Overlay Districts) and 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A and B),
Applicability), is amended to modify the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay
District as follows:
SECTION 1. That Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert
Character Overlay Districts) is amended to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the
Desert Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to
define the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to
provide guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert. The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development. The key to successful
development within the three districts, which maintain interconnected undisturbed
desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual subdivision sites before laying out
the design of streets and lots.
Page 857
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area.
Subdistrict A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek
Wash and includes the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks,
Recreation and Library Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran
Preserve. With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and intensity of
residential development characterize this area. The Desert Maintenance Overlay
Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density allowed and the most
restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor
along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low
density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an
area to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas
and washes becomes possible.
***
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character Districts
Page 858
SECTION 2. That Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay
(Sub-Districts A and B), Applicability) is amended to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land
within the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A).
More specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to
all land within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the
Cave Creek Wash connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree
Highway to the 16th Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment
along the west, and the west boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending
south along the Black Mountain Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then
running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash to the 32nd Street alignment at the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
Page 859
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the
area bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation
Area along the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the
commercially designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road
and Dynamite Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the
Tatum Ranch Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and
Black Mountain Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning
Ordinance is required for all development, plus adherence to the design
guidelines and standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the
Zoning Ordinance.
***
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Page 860
Attachment B
Staff Report
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Application No. Z-TA-5-18-2: Amend Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance to modify
the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 as shown in
Exhibit A.
Purpose
The intent of this text amendment is to revise the applicability area and associated text
for the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay Districts to align
with transportation corridor updates since the adoption of the overlay district.
The Desert Maintenance
Overlay District contains use
standards and district
regulations that are contained in
two subdistricts, Sub-District A
and Sub-District B. Sub-District
A applies to land approximately
one mile in each direction from
Cave Creek Wash, from
Carefree Highway on the north
to the Dynamite Road alignment
on the south. Sub-District B
applies to land east of Sub-
District A and generally extends
to Cave Creek Road. The
current boundaries of the
subdistricts are shown to the left,
in pink (Sub-District A) and blue
(Sub-District B).
Desert Maintenance Overlay District Sub-Areas,
Source: Hilgart Wilson
Page 861
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 2
The applicant’s proposed
modification would modify the
boundaries of both Sub-District A
and Sub-District B. Sub-District A
standards are proposed to be
removed from the property south
of Sonoran Desert Drive and west
of Cave Creek Wash. Land south
of Sonoran Desert Drive and east
of Cave Creek Wash, currently in
Sub-District A, would become a
part of Sub-District B. The area
impacted by this proposed
modification is shown to the left.
Staff is recommending a smaller
modification that would only
remove Sub-District A standards
from an approximately 155.06-acre
Applicant Proposed Desert Maintenance Overlay portion of the original request as
District Modifications, Source: Hilgart Wilson depicted on the left.
Minor text updates to the overlay
are also proposed to provide
consistency with the geographic
modifications of the subdistrict
areas.
There are three additional
concurrent requests. Rezoning
Case No. Z-75-18-2 is a
companion rezoning case to Z-TA-
5-18-2 and would modify the
boundary of the Desert Character
Overlay District on the city’s
Zoning Map for 155.06 acres.
General Plan Amendment Case
No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 and
Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2
encompass the Verdin site (488
acres). General Plan Amendment
Staff Recommended Desert Maintenance Overlay Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-18-2
District Modifications, Source: Hilgart Wilson
seeks to modify the land use map
Page 862
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 3
designation and removal from the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay. Rezoning Case No.
Z-62-18-2 proposes to rezone the property to a Planned Unit Development district.
Background: Desert Character Overlay Districts
The Desert Character Overlay Districts, Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance, was
established in 2001 via Text Amendment Case No. Z-TA-3-99 with a general purpose to
implement the North Land Use Plan. The intent of the overlay was to establish three
character districts; Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert, to define
the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas and to provide guidance
for new development. Standards for the Desert Maintenance Overlay District were
included in the original text amendment. Standards for the Rural Desert and Suburban
Desert Overlay Districts have not been established.
The overlay district contains distinct permitted uses and district standards for Sub-
Districts A and B in addition to design guidelines applicable to both subdistricts. Single-
family residential uses are permitted in both subdistricts, with attached dwelling units
only permitted in Sub-District B. Select commercial uses are permitted in Sub-District
B, subject to obtaining a Special Permit.
District standards for the subdistricts include provisions designed to address lot size,
building envelope, height, setbacks, access, native landscaping and treatment of
washes. Design guidelines contain additional guidance on site disturbance, native plant
preservation, building and wall design, and access to preserve areas, among others.
Background: Peripheral Areas C and D and North Land Use Plans
In 1987, Phoenix City Council adopted the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan as an
amendment to the General Plan. The intent of the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was
to serve as a guide for future land use and development in the planning area, which
consisted of approximately 111 square miles of largely undeveloped land north of the
Central Arizona Project canal in North Phoenix. Within the Implementation Program
section of the Plan, further refinement of the general character elements was suggested
prior to any formal ordinance adoption.
The North Land Use Plan was adopted in 1996 to further the existing policies of the
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan. The Plan divided the planning area into three character
areas, Desert Preserve, Rural Desert and Suburban Residential, and suggested that
overlay districts be developed to provide clear development standards in line with
community desires. The Desert Preserve character area aligns with the area included
in the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
Page 863
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 4
North Land Use Plan Character Areas, Source: City of Phoenix
Background: Verdin Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposal
The Verdin PUD (Companion Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2) intregrates a number of
design considerations based on Desert Maintenane Character District standards.
These include a sensitive transition from open space to developed areas, conservation
of washes and wildlife habitats, and use of native plants.
In addition to the considerations based on overlay standards, the Planned Unit
Development includes enhanced standards for increased open space, connectivity to
adjacent preserve areas, a public trail and heightened landscape standards developed
in concert with the National Wildlife Federation.
Because these standards do not apply to property outside of the Verdin PUD request
area, staff is recommending a smaller modification to the applicability area proposed by
the applicant.
Background: Northeast Outer Loop and Sonoran Desert Drive
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan included discussion of a proposed Northeast Outer
Loop. The Northeast Outer Loop was a planned limited access extension of the
Northwest Loop from Interstate 17, north of the Union Hills and Cave Buttes recreation
areas, connecting to Dynamite Boulevard and traversing east toward the city of
Page 864
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 5
Scottsdale. Proposed land uses for Area D (north of Jomax Road) were contemplated
based on proposed transportation infrastructure, with a Village Core planned for the
northwest corner of Cave Creek Road and the Northeast Outer Loop / Dynamite Road
alignment.
Peripheral Areas C and D Plan Land Use and Circulation, Source: City of Phoenix
By the North Land Use Plan’s adoption, plans for the Northeast Outer Loop had ceased.
As a result, the planned Core at Cave Creek and Dynamite Roads was reduced in size
and geared to function as a community service area instead of an employment hub.
Reduction in the planned commercial area at this location contributed to the inclusion of
the area west of Cave Creek Road into the Desert Preserve character area identified in
the plan. While no longer planned as a limited access roadway, Dynamite Road was
utilized as a dividing line between a planned preservation buffer for the Cave Creek
Wash to the north and a more dense residental area adjcent to the Cave Buttes
Recreational area to the south.
While an east-west connection between Interstate 17 and northeast Phoenix has been
planned since 1987, public involvment efforts to refine the alignment and type of
roadway commenced in 2002. The final aligment for Sonoran Parkway, adopted by
Phoenix City Council in 2006 as a result of the recommendation by the East Sonoran
Parkway Alignment Committee, was carefully designed to minimize the impact of the
roadway on the future mountain preserve area and intended to serve as a buffer
between the preserve and adjacent development. Construction of Sonoran Boulevard,
now known as the northern leg of Sonoran Desert Drive, began in 2010 and was
completed in 2013.
Staff Analysis
The boundary of the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts was derived from the Desert Preserve character area outlined in the North
Land Use Plan. This preservation area distinguished between the planned preserve
area north of the then Dynamite Road alignment and the area adjacent to the Cave
Page 865
Staff Report Z-TA-5-18-2
March 9, 2022
Page 6
Buttes Recreational area, which was slated for additional residential development.
Subsequent to the approval of the Desert Character Overlay Districts, the roadway
connecting Interstate 17 to Cave Creek Road was further evaluated and realigned as
the currently constructed Sonoran Desert Drive.
In addition, the companion Verdin PUD request contains development standards and
design guidelines that are intended to provide consistency with Desert Maintenance
Overlay standards and the general intent of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
These standards collectively ensure appropriate development within the undisturbed
desert context.
Due to the shift in the transportation corridor from the inception of the Desert Character
Overlay Districts in addition to the enhanced standards contained in the Verdin PUD,
the staff recommended modification to the Sub-District boundaries and associated
ordinance language is warranted.
Conclusion
Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Writer
S. Keating
March 9, 2022
Exhibits
Exhibit A: Proposed Language (4 pages)
Exhibit B: Text Amendment Sketch Map
Exhibit C: Staff Recommendation Text Amendment Sketch Map
Page 866
EXHIBIT A
Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2:
Modification of Boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay Districts
Proposed Language:
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay
Districts) to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the
Desert Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to
define the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to
provide guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert. The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development. The key to successful
development within the three districts, which maintain interconnected undisturbed
desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual subdivision sites before laying out
the design of streets and lots.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area.
Subdistrict A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek
Wash and includes the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks,
Recreation and Library Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran
Preserve. With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and intensity of
residential development characterize this area. The Desert Maintenance Overlay
Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density allowed and the most
restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor
along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low
density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an
area to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas
and washes becomes possible.
***
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character DistrictS
Page 867
Page 868
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A
and B), Applicability) to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land
within the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A).
More specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to
all land within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the
Cave Creek Wash connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree
Highway to the 16th Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment
along the west, and the west boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending
south along the Black Mountain Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then
Page 869
running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash to the 32nd Street alignment at the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the
area bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation
Area along the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the
commercially designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road
and Dynamite Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the
Tatum Ranch Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and
Black Mountain Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning
Ordinance is required for all development, plus adherence to the design
guidelines and standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the
Zoning Ordinance.
***
Page 870
Text Amendment
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-75-18 ACRES: 6222.46 +/-
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
EXISTING:
DCOD A ( 4681.97 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character A
Overlay District D
KR
Desert Maintenance Character B
E EE
Overlay District SO CR
N OR
AN AV
E
DE NC
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
PROPOSED CHANGE:
DCOD A ( 3977.29 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2245.17 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character
A Overlay District D
Desert Maintenance Character KR
B Overlay District CR
E EE
SO
NO AV
RA E
N NC
DE
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
Page 871
Text Amendment
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-75-18 ACRES: 6465.72 +/-
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
EXISTING:
DCOD A ( 4681.97 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character A
Overlay District D
KR
Desert Maintenance Character B
Overlay District E EE
SO CR
N OR
AN AV
E
DE NC
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
PROPOSED CHANGE (Per Staff Recommendation):
DCOD A ( 4463.85 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character
A Overlay District D
Desert Maintenance Character KR
B Overlay District CR
E EE
SO
NO AV
RA E
N NC
DE
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
Page 872
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries between the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 873
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 874
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 875
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 876
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting April 2, 2019
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, gave a presentation of the case up to this point in time. She
stated that they started this process back in August. Ms. Demmitt went through the
General Plan history of the area, along with the Desert Character Overlay District
establishment. She summarized the infrastructure improvements that would be required
for the subdivision to be built. Ms. Demmitt went on to describe the comments the
developer is receiving from members of the public. The first comment was that the
property should stay S-1. Ms. Demmitt stated that staying S-1 would be one home per
acre. Having a subdivision with multiple sized lots/homes would be more affordable for
residents to live in proximity to the preserve.
The next comment from the public that was addressed is the condition of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Ms. Demmitt stated they are working with the City and the State Land
Department to evaluate. She went on to present pages form the 2002 council report that
indicated that at full capacity, Sonoran Desert Drive will be able to handle 50,000 cars a
day. The road was intended to be a major thoroughfare.
The next concern Ms. Demmitt addressed was the acquisition of Sonoran Preserve
Land. She went on to state that the MacEwen property has been privately held since the
1950’s. Taylor Morrison is agreeable to put a public trail through the center of the
property, adjacent to the wash corridor, to connect the preserve north and south of
Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated they will comply with the Sonoran Edge Treatment
Guidelines. Ms. Demmitt stated the City’s Park and Recreation Department is currently
looking at acquiring the land to the east of the MacEwen parcel for preserve.
Lou Lagrave stated that he understands that Sonoran Desert Drive is intended to be a
six-lane arterial and the General Plan on the southern two-thirds of the property has the
land use designation that supports the proposed density but that he still has concerns.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 877
Mr. Lagrave stated that he is concerned about the traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, how
the kids will get to school and the proposed lot sizes.
Susan Demmitt addressed Mr. Lagrave and stated that they are looking into what they
can do to alleviate some of the concerns regarding Sonoran Desert Drive but the
construction of the southern leg is 47 million dollars. She stated that the kids that live in
this development will have the option of attending either Deer Valley Schools or Cave
Creek Schools. She stated that both school districts will be providing bus service into
the neighborhood.
Jill Hankins asked if the Mesquite Wash is a 404 wash. Susan Demmitt referred to
Nguyen Lam on her development team. Mr. Lam stated they are disturbing less than an
acre and it is not within the 404-protected area. Ms. Hankins asked if there have been
any studies done regarding cultural items or protected species. Mr. Lam stated the
studies have been done and nothing was found.
Doug Dickson stated that the committee has received many emails opposition and not
one in support. Doug Dickson stated that they should talk to State Land about swapping
this parcel for a better suited piece of land. He asked if the applicant had explored this
option. Ms. Demmitt stated that the City hasn’t identified this piece of land as preserve
land, but they have not discussed a swap with State Land.
Steve Bowser stated that the committee has letters in front of them in opposition from
the Sierra Club and PMPC.
Steve Bowser read the cards in opposition that didn’t wish to speak.
The floor was opened for public comment.
Debra Sedillo Dugan, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic and views. She
said the signs were posted where no one could see them until the applicant recently
moved them.
John Furniss, resident, stated he is the Chair of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve
Committee for the Parks and Recreation Department. He said there should be a letter
from their committee to deny this project. He stated that they aren’t opposed to growth,
but this will set precedence and that we need to protect what he have.
Stacie Beute, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She has been a longtime
friend to the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and advises on committees. She said that
Taylor Morrison will be selling the homes with the added amenity of the proximity to the
preserve, but they are developing on the preserve. She stated she is concerned about
the impacts on the environment.
Amanda Farr, resident, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is currently a safe place to
cycle and run. If this development is approved, it will no longer be safe.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated that he is a Park Steward for the Phoenix Mountain
Preserve. He stated that he started the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group as an
advocacy group in response to the request. He stated that the proposal isn’t consistent
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 878
with the North Land Use Plan and the Desert View Character Plan. Mr. Kirkilas urged
the committee that if it doesn’t make sense, say no to the proposal.
Daniel Centilli, resident, stated that he is a Desert Ridge homeowner. He said the
current DCOD overlay prevents something like this proposal from happening. He stated
that the applicant is asking for exceptions to the law. He went on to state the preserve is
our legacy.
Patrick Havley, resident, thanked the committee. He stated he is concerned for the
safety of cyclists on Sonoran Desert Drive. He also stated this project won’t contribute
to the overall good of the City.
Gannon Burleigh, resident, said that he is opposed and has concerns about traffic,
schools and the impact on the preserve. He said that the project is irresponsible
development and that the removal of the overlay district that protects the preserve is
ridiculous.
Laura Jones, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated the development should be one acre lots to preserve the wildlife.
Patrick McMullen, resident, states that he is the President of the PMPC. He stated that
the Phoenix Mountain Preserve Council has been around since the 1970’s to preserve
the desert. He stated that PMPC is opposed to the request.
Mandy Fellows, resident, passed out a study from an ASU professor concerning the
ecological impact and flooding concerns in the area. She stated that this area is
downstream from three dams, with the closest dam being 1.5 miles away.
John Trojan, resident, stated he is opposed to the request with concerns about traffic,
pedestrian safety and allowing the developer to craft their own zoning standards.
Lainy Porter, resident, stated she moved to Arizona for pain management. She stated
that she trains for triathlons on Sonoran Desert Drive and is concerned about the
increase in traffic.
Claudia Wagner, resident, stated she is a trail runner and has concerns about the
danger the increased traffic with cause on Sonoran Desert Drive. She is also concerned
about the potential for flooding.
Heather Larson, resident, stated she is concerned about the increase in traffic and
pedestrian safety.
Tim Holt, resident, said that he moved to Phoenix from Seattle. He said this proposal is
just setting precedence and the next development will be even more dense. Mr. Holt
went on to state this project is about money and greed.
Brett Scholar, resident, stated that he uses Sonoran Desert Drive to run and cycle. He
questioned the benefit the applicant will bring to the area. He stated that the property
should stay as it is currently zoned.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 879
Lindsey Tillman, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She said that the City
needs to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
Susan Beccian, resident, stated that she is one of the only people that have received
letters about this case but didn’t receive one concerning the meeting tonight. She said
she is concerned that Gammage and Burnham isn’t being upfront with the community.
Cassandra Leone, resident, thanked her neighbors for coming out to oppose the zoning
request. She said she is concerned about pedestrian safety and the traffic on Sonoran
Desert Drive. She said she has read the PUD and has concerns about the sustainability
section.
Michelle Kelley, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. She commented
that just because a plan is 30 years old doesn’t mean it’s not a good plan. It means the
community and the planning department were visioning long term. This request doesn’t
comply with the Desert View Character Plan. Ms. Kelley went on to state that the school
is over capacity and there is no real plan from the applicant to resolve that issue. She
closed by stating the area should be preserved and the plans should not be changed.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. Ms. Pierce went on to
state that this project is going to be a financial burden on taxpayers. Even though the
applicant must pay to extend infrastructure, the taxpayers pay to maintain this
infrastructure that is being extended to only serve this subdivision.
Christine Severance, resident, stated that that the signs for the hearing were posted far
from the road so they couldn’t be read. She stated the applicant purchased the property
with the current zoning and that it shouldn’t be changed.
Karen Severance, resident, stated that the preserve means a lot to her. She urged the
committee to think about the ecosystem when they vote on this case at a later date.
Jennifer Severance, resident, stated that nature needs to have space. The edges of the
preserve are important.
Karl Mar, resident, stated that he is opposed to the request. He said that the
infrastructure can’t handle a development of this size.
Patty Killinger, resident, stated that she has been in the area since the 1970’s. She said
that the parcel’s adjacency to the Sonoran Preserve is important.
Anna Lewandowski, resident, stated she just found out about the project about two
weeks ago and came to the meeting to learn more about it. She said from listening to
the applicant’s presentation and the testimony of the public, it sounds like this
development is 10 years too soon. The current infrastructure and school systems can’t
handle the residents this development will generate.
Mike Rooney, resident, stated this project is political. This development is not consistent
with the Desert View Character Plan.
Patricia Story, resident, stated that she is concerned for public safety in the areas. She
said the area already has an emergency response time issue.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 880
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 6, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately build
1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan.
Lou Lagrave had questions regarding the alignment of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated
it is a nice development in the wrong location and that there is no justification for the
density. He stated that according to the North Land Use Plan that this area is intended
to be 2 dwelling units per acre or less.
Rick Nowell clarified that the applicant would only be adding one lane in front of their
own development, not the entire length of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated it is a nice
project in the wrong place. He stated that Sanctuary at Desert Ridge is unsightly and he
doesn’t want to see that in this location.
Rick Powell asked which school district in which the property is located. Ms. Demmitt
said Deer Valley.
Steve Bowser asked how long the land has been privately held. Ms. Demmitt stated
since the 1950’s.
Ryan Schaefer asked if the developer was contributing to the Sonoran Desert Drive
alignment. Ms. Demmitt said the subdivision will be contributing to impact fees.
Jill Hankins expressed concern about the safety of the cyclists on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated there needs to be an underpass and islands for the bikers.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 881
Steve Bowser opened the meeting to public comment.
Richard Puleri, resident, stated he has concerns about the current traffic congestion on
Sonoran Desert Drive and inquired on when Sonoran Desert Drive will be expanded
and connected.
Michael Kaciemba, resident, stated he lives in Sonoran Foothills and that he has
concerns about the current traffic congestion. He stated that this project shouldn’t be
improved until the streets are expanded. He also addressed the school doesn’t have
capacity.
Public comment closed.
Reginald Younger said that Taylor Morrison expanded the roads with Sky Crossing.
Rick Powell states he has concerns about the school capacity.
Deanna Chew asked if residents would have a City of Phoenix address. Ms. Demmitt
stated she believes they will.
Rick Nowell asked if a traffic study has been done. Ms. Demmitt says it was recently
completed but has not been submitted to the City yet.
There was a brief committee discussion concerning the possibility of age restriction
subdivisions within the development.
Louis Lagrave stated he believes in land rights but this needs to come back with R1-10
zoning. Louis Lagrave also requested staff send out the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 882
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries between the 16th Street and 32nd Street
alignments
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #4 – Information Only – Z-62-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 883
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 884
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2018
Request Modify the Desert Character Overlay District for
approximately 638 acres to modify a portion from Sub-
District A to Sub-District B and remove a portion of
property from Sub-District A
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480 PUD. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately
build 1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan. She stated they are working
with the Deer Valley School District to come up with a solution to the school capacity
issue. She stated they are looking into the option of Cave Creek Schools.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, expressed several concerns:
- Traffic safety and cyclist safety on Sonoran Desert Drive.
- Public safety response time.
- Elimination of the night sky.
- Density is too high.
He then asked if the applicant has been in communication with the State Land
Department to see when the surrounding land will be opened for auction. Susan
Demmitt stated it won’t be within the next 5 years.
Jason Stokes, VPC member, asked where the closest fire station is located. Ms.
Demmitt stated Cave Creek and Dynamite.
Steve Tucker, VPC member, asked what would happen in the notch. Ms. Demmitt
states most likely residential. Mr. Tucker stated that the road improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive need to happen before development.
Julie Read, VPC member, asked how many homes are approved for Sonoran Gate. Ms.
Demmitt responded 255 homes.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 885
Shannon Simon, VPC member, inquired about the City’s timeline for the complete build
out of Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated the light pollution from Sonoran Gate isn’t as
bad as she thought. Ms. Simon then asked if all the neighborhoods will be gated. Ms.
Demmitt responded that some neighborhoods will be gated.
Julie Read, VPC member, stated she has concerns about the school capacity issue and
the fact that some of the students could be going to Cave Creek Schools. She stated
that a neighborhood elementary school builds a sense of community. Ms. Read asked
what the target market will be for this development. Ms. Demmitt states they are still
trying to identify the target. Julie Read asked how many children there are in Sonoran
Gate. A resident in the audience who lives in Sonoran Gate stated about 1 in 8 homes
have kids.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated that Sonoran Gate has a lot of amenities for kids
so there might not be a lot of kids right now but they can come. She stated she is
concerned with the school capacity. She said that it is at least a 20 to 25-minute drive to
the closest Cave Creek elementary school by car, so it would be even longer by bus.
Susan Demmitt stated that Taylor Morrison is committed to working with the school
districts to find a solution.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated she is concerned about school buses going in and
out of the neighborhood with the traffic and the speeds vehicles travel along Sonoran
Desert Drive. She also stated open enrollment can be deceiving because students can
get kicked out of the school.
The floor was open to public comment.
Michelle Kelly, resident, stated she was opposed to the request. She stated she is
concerned about the density. She stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills, which is lower
in density than the proposed project. She stated that Sonoran Foothills Elementary land
was gifted by the developer. She is concerned about police and fire response times.
She stated the project is too dense without the proper infrastructure in place.
Burt Bragin, resident, voiced his concerns about Sonoran Desert Drive and the current
traffic. He stated the connection to the 303 needs to be made before the project is
approved. He stated Sonoran Foothills has 1,300 homes and a school was gifted by the
developer. He stated this development has 6 to 7 times more homes that Sonoran Gate.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that Deer Valley Schools doesn’t want a school site at
this location.
Cynthia Wise, resident, stated she is in favor of the request. She said Taylor Morrison
did a great job with the current infrastructure improvements within Sonoran Gate.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated he is a park steward for the Apache Wash trailhead. He
stated this development would change the entire character of the area. He then asked
the developer how they will make it look like the preserve.
J.R. Oliver, resident, stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills and has to wait a long time to
get out of her subdivision. She stated the connection to the 303 would help a lot.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 886
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that is more of a regional issue and to talk to the City’s
Street Transportation Department.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated she opposes the project and is a resident of Desert
Enclave. She said on the way to the meeting they had to wait until 56 cars went by to
turn out. She stated this development will have an adverse reaction on the desert
wildlife and preserve area. She stated this development is in contradiction of the
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
L. Chicchillo, resident, stated the current Taylor Morrison project looks like row houses.
He stated he lives in Desert Enclave and is worried about the traffic.
Spero Papos, resident, asked if the land had been purchased. The applicant confirmed
it had not been purchased yet. He inquired about traffic lights.
Julie Read, VPC member asked if the applicant has met with ADOT because they
would like to see more information about the project.
There was then a committee discussion about how Dove Valley Road, Cave Creek
Road and 27th Avenue all get flooded out in the monsoon storms.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, stated that the North Gateway minutes will be forwarded onto
the Desert View VPC with their packet so they are aware of the discussion that took
place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 887
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation to amend the
applicability area and associated text for the Desert
Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #5 – Z-75-18-2, Item #6 – GPA-DSTV-18-2,
and Item #7 – Z-62-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 888
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 889
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 890
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Michelle Ricart made a motion to approve Z-TA-5-18-
2, per the staff recommendation to amend the applicability area and associated text for
the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay Districts as shown in
Exhibit A of the staff report. The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Shannon Simon.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 891
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-5-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request Amend Section 653 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance to
modify the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD)
boundaries
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location South of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th and
32nd Street alignments
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation to amend the
applicability area and associated text for the Desert
Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report
VPC Vote 7-4
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 892
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 893
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 894
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 895
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – Z-TA-5-18-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to recommend approval of Z-TA-5-18-2, per the
staff recommendation. Committee Member Santoro seconded the motion.
VOTE
7-4, motion to recommend approval, per staff recommendation, passed; Members
Dean, Israel, Kollar, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Members Hankins,
Nowell, Powell, and Reynolds against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 896
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-TA-5-18-2
(Modification to the Desert Character Overlay District)
April 26, 2022
Application No. Z-TA-5-18-2: Amend Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance to modify
the boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay District.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 per Addendum A.
The applicant’s original request was to modify the boundaries of both Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. Sub-District A standards are proposed to be removed from the area
south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave Creek Wash. Land south of Sonoran
Desert Drive and east of Cave Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become a
part of Sub-District B.
The applicant proposed to modify their request to align with the staff recommendation to
remove Sub-District A standards for approximately 155.06 acres of the Desert
Character Overlay District.
The associated text updates and sketch maps are attached to reflect this update.
Exhibits
Proposed Language (4 pages)
Sketch Map
Page 897
EXHIBIT A
Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2:
Modification of Boundaries of the Desert Character Overlay Districts
Proposed Language:
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay
Districts) to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the
Desert Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to
define the nature of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to
provide guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert. The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development. The key to successful
development within the three districts, which maintain interconnected undisturbed
desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual subdivision sites before laying out
the design of streets and lots.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area.
Subdistrict A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek
Wash and includes the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks,
Recreation and Library Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran
Preserve. With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and intensity of
residential development characterize this area. The Desert Maintenance Overlay
Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density allowed and the most
restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor
along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low
density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an
area to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas
and washes becomes possible.
***
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character DistrictS
Page 898
Page 899
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A
and B), Applicability) to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land
within the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A).
More specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to
all land within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the
Cave Creek Wash connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree
Highway to the 16th Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment
along the west, and the west boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending
south along the Black Mountain Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then
Page 900
running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash to the 32nd Street alignment at the
Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the
area bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation
Area along the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the
commercially designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road
and Dynamite Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the
Tatum Ranch Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and
Black Mountain Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning
Ordinance is required for all development, plus adherence to the design
guidelines and standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the
Zoning Ordinance.
***
Page 901
Text Amendment
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: Z-TA-5-18-2 ACRES: 6465.72 +/-
VILLAGE: Desert View COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
EXISTING:
DCOD A ( 4681.97 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character A
Overlay District D
KR
Desert Maintenance Character B
Overlay District E EE
SO CR
N OR
AN AV
E
DE NC
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
PROPOSED CHANGE:
DCOD A ( 4526.91 +/- Acres)
DCOD B ( 2001.87 +/- Acres)
E CAREFREE HWY
Desert Maintenance Character
A Overlay District D
Desert Maintenance Character KR
B Overlay District CR
E EE
SO
NO AV
RA E
N NC
DE
SE
RT
DR
E JOMAX RD
Page 902
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and Z-62-
18-2)
Location: South of Sonoran Desert Drive between 16th and 32nd Street alignments
Proposal: Amend Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance to modify the boundaries of
the Desert Character Overlay District.
Applicant: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Owner: MacEwan Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in Exhibit A.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
North Gateway 11/8/2018 Information only.
Desert View 11/6/2018 Information only.
Desert View 4/2/2019 Information only.
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 7-4.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve Z-TA-5-18-2, per the
Addendum A Staff Report.
Maker: Simon
Second: Mangum
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The boundary of the Desert Maintenance Overlay of the Desert Character Overlay
Districts was derived from the Desert Preserve character area outlined in the North
Land Use Plan. This preservation area distinguished between the planned preserve
area north of the then Dynamite Road alignment and the area adjacent to the Cave
Buttes Recreational area, which was slated for additional residential development.
Subsequent to the approval of the Desert Character Overlay Districts, the roadway
connecting Interstate 17 to Cave Creek Road was further evaluated and realigned as
the currently constructed Sonoran Desert Drive.
Page 903
2. The companion Verdin PUD request contains development standards and
design guidelines that are intended to provide consistency with Desert Maintenance
Overlay standards and the general intent of the Desert Character Overlay Districts.
These standards collectively ensure appropriate development within the undisturbed
desert context.
3. Due to the shift in the transportation corridor from the inception of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts in addition to the enhanced standards contained in the
Verdin PUD, the staff recommended modification to the Sub-District boundaries and
associated ordinance language is warranted.
Proposed Language:
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.A. (General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts)
to replace Figure A and read as follows:
A. General Purpose of Desert Character Overlay Districts. The purpose of the Desert
Character Overlay Districts is to implement the north land use plan, to define the nature
of development while maintaining undisturbed areas, and to provide guidance for new
development to occur within the context of the fragile undisturbed desert. The Desert
Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert Overlay Districts are designed in
response to existing undisturbed conditions and pressures placed on them by increased
development. The key to successful development within the three districts, which
maintain interconnected undisturbed desert and washes, lies in analysis of individual
subdivision sites before laying out the design of streets and lots.
The Desert Maintenance Overlay District is divided into Subdistricts A and B,. as
illustrated on Figure A. in order to address specific requirements of this area. Subdistrict
A includes approximately one mile on both sides of the Cave Creek Wash and includes
the area along the wash, that is not part of any Parks, Recreation and Library
Department managed open space, such as the a Sonoran Preserve. With the many
washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition crossing this area, Subdistrict A is
intended to provide a transition from the preserve to areas with greater density. A very
low density, scale and intensity of residential development characterize this area. The
Desert Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to
density allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas
and the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by
low density development which may be sited in clusters along with provision for an area
to allow access to the Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of
development in this area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas and
washes becomes possible.
***
Page 904
Figure A: Desert Maintenance Character DistrictS
Page 905
Amend Chapter 6, Section 653.B.2. (Desert Maintenance Overlay (Sub-Districts A and B),
Applicability) to read as follows:
2. Applicability. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District applies to all land within
the area as depicted on the Desert Character District Map (Figure A). More
specifically, the Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District A applies to all land
within the area bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment on the south, a line running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash
connecting the 24th Street alignment at Carefree Highway to the 16th Street
alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the west, and the west
boundary of Dove Valley Ranch extending south along the Black Mountain
Parkway to Ashler Hills Drive and then running parallel to the Cave Creek Wash
to the 32nd Street alignment at the Dynamite Boulevard alignment along the east.
Page 906
The Desert Maintenance Overlay Sub-District B applies to all land within the area
bounded by Sub-District A on the north, the Cave Buttes Recreation Area along
the south and west, and Cave Creek Road (excluding the commercially
designated parcel at the northwest corner of Cave Creek Road and Dynamite
Boulevard) together with the south and west boundary of the Tatum Ranch
Planned Community District (west of Cave Creek Road) and Black Mountain
Parkway along the east.
A site plan approved in accordance with Section 507 of the Zoning Ordinance is
required for all development, plus adherence to the design guidelines and
standards detailed below and in Section 507 Tab A of the Zoning Ordinance.
***
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 907
Page 908
Page 909
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
- Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-62-18-2
(Verdin PUD) - Southwest corner of the 24th Street Alignment and Sonoran
Desert Drive (Ordinance G-6991)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-62-18-
2 and rezone the site from S-1 DCOD (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District), S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District), and RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character Overlay District) to PUD DCOD
(Pending PUD) (Planned Unit Development, Desert Character Overlay District,
pending Planned Unit Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow
single-family residential. This is a companion case to GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2,
and Z-TA-5-18-2 and must be heard following Z-TA-5-18-2.
Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 DCOD (144.82 acres), S-1 (333.57 acres), RE-35 DCOD (10.24
acres)
Proposed Zoning: PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 acres) and PUD (333.57 acres)
Acreage: 488.63 acres
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow single family residential
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 6,
2018, Apr. 2, 2019, and Dec. 7, 2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village
Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 8, 2018 and Dec. 9, 2021, for information
only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with a modified
stipulation, by a vote of 4-1. The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this
case on April 5, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with
Page 910
modifications and additional stipulations, by a vote of 10-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the staff memo dated May 5, 2022, by a vote of 7-1.
Location
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 28239 N. 23rd St.; and 28231, 28235, 28241, and 28245 N. 24th St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 911
To: Alan Stephenson Date: June 28, 2022
Deputy City Manager
Planning and Development Director
From: Joshua Bednarek
Planning and Development Deputy Director
Subject: ITEM 171 ON THE JULY 1, 2022 PUBLIC HEARING/FORMAL AGENDA –
REZONING APPLICATION Z-62-18-2 – SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 24TH
STREET ALIGNMENT AND SONORAN DESERT DRIVE (ORDINANCE G-6991)
Item 171, Rezoning Application Z-62-18-2 (Verdin PUD) is a request to rezone 488.63
acres located at the southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert
Drive from S-1 DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD to allow single-family residential
(Ordinance G-6991).
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard the case on March 10, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with a modification by a vote of 4-1.
The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard the case on April 5, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with modifications and additional
stipulations by a vote of 10-1.
The Planning Commission heard the case on May 5, 2022 and recommended approval
per a staff memo by a vote of 7-1. One of the stipulations required the execution of a
development agreement between the city and the developer within 24 months of City
Council approval of this change of zone and prior to final site plan approval and issuance
of any grading and drainage permits. The development agreement is to outline the
requirements for initial improvements to Sonoran Desert Drive, as well as financial
contributions for the ultimate buildout of Sonoran Desert Drive.
On July 1, 2022, the City Council continued this rezoning request, along with three other
related cases, in order to allow additional time to finalize the site-specific development
agreement and to finalize the north area Sonoran Desert Drive Funding Policy for the City
Council to adopt concurrently with the site specific planning and zoning items.
After the continuance recommendation, the City of Phoenix declared a Stage 1 Water Alert
and the applicant agreed to incorporate drought management commitments into the PUD
Development Narrative (see the attached Verdin Drought Management Commitment).
Below are the modified stipulations that will add language regarding water conservation
and sustainability measures for the development.
Additionally, the representative for this rezoning request has been working with the
community and is requesting to add a new stipulation and modify stipulations to address
their commitment to build one-story homes along the east and north portions of the site
and to increase the open space tract along the eastern boundary of the site. The
stipulations below reflect the representative’s commitments. The legislative edits with
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
CAPS and strike-throughs illustrate changes made at the village and Planning
Commission levels. All added and modified stipulations, since the Planning Commission
recommendation, are in bold font below.
Staff recommends approval, subject to the following stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with
the Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3,
2022, as modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES
6, 8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
DENSITY TO 2.6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6,
8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
NUMBER OF UNITS TO 1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY
TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH
CORRIDOR. THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A
CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA
WITH PLANT MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST:
GREEN LIST. PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, AND
136: REMOVE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL – SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT
COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL
SHALL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO
THE WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED
PLANT PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123,
SECTION 9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD
LANGUAGE REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
ACRES ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A
PROVISION FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE
DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN
SPACE.
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO
PATHS, PER STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL
SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL
ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
dh. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT
DENSITY THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS
FOR THE ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT
REFERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN
SECTION 4.C. (REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE
DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM
UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGES 37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: MODIFY FOOTNOTE 6 TO ALSO LIMIT THE
BUILDING HEIGHT FOR HOMES BUILT ON THE FIRST ROW OF
RESIDENTIAL LOTS ALONG THE EASTERN AND NORTHERN SITE
BOUNDARIES TO ONE-STORY WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24-
FEET MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF PARAPET OR THE TOP OF
THE RIDGE ON SLOPING ROOFS.
kl. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT
PROHIBITED BY CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY
ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE
ALLOWED…”
lm. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.3.A: ADD THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE
UNDER THE EXISTING SENTENCE: “ANY WALLS OR FENCING
ALONG A PRESERVE EDGE/MCFCD PROPERTY BOUNDARY,
OTHER THAN WALLS OR FENCING FOR INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL
LOTS, SHALL BE COMPRISED OF THE BARRIER FENCING TYPE,
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
WHICH ARE DESIGNED WITH SUFFICIENT OPENINGS TO ALLOW
THE REGULAR PASSAGE OF WILDLIFE.”
mn. PAGE 42, SECTION 6.3.B: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO ‘A
MAXIMUM 6-FOOT, 4-INCH HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING” TO ‘A
MAXIMUM 5-FOOT HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING’.
no. PAGE 46, SECTION 6.6: CHANGE ‘14 FEET’ TO ‘12 FEET’.
lop. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC
TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE
THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT
PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR
VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO
THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
q. PAGE 70, SECTION 4.D: AFTER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH ADD
LANGUAGE REGARDING COMMON AREA LANDSCAPING
STANDARDS TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
• PROHIBIT NON-FUNCTIONAL TURF AND INCLUDE AN
EXPLANATION OF WHAT NON-FUNCTIONAL TURF IS.
• PROHIBITING TURF WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR AND CAVE CREEK WASH EDGES.
• TURF, WHERE ALLOWED, WILL NOT BE PLANNED ON
SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 5%.
• REGULAR WATER LEAK DETECTION AUDITS WILL TAKE
PLACE FOR COMMON AREAS MANAGED AND MAINTAINED
BY THE HOA.
r. PAGE 75-76: ADD A SUBSECTION REGARDING REAR YARD TURF
AND INCLUDE LANGUAGE RESTRICTING TURF IN THE REAR
YARD TO A MAXIMUM 20%.
ps. PAGE 79-80, SECTION 5.A, LAST BULLET POINT: ADD THE
FOLLOWING AFTER THE FIRST SENTENCE: “THE USE OF
RETAINING WALLS IN EXCESS OF 4 FEET IS DISCOURAGED AND
SHOULD BE LIMITED TO LOCATIONS WHERE NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE SPECIFIC SITE TOPOGRAPHY.”
mq PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS –
t. DESERT WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO
THE YELLOW LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
nr PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
u. NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND
ADD IT TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
v. PAGE 98, NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION COLLABORATION
GOALS: ADD A GOAL REGARDING SUBSTANTIAL WATER
CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT COMMITMENTS.
os PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT.
w. UPDATE THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE MINIMUM 25-FOOT,
AVERAGE 50-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE
PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS A
CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA AND
MAY INCLUDE LIMITED TRAILHEAD AND TRAIL OR PATHWAY
IMPROVEMENTS, BARRIER FENCING AND RETENTION AREAS
FOR THE PROJECT.
pt PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
x. STATING THAT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT, AVERAGE 50-FOOT OPEN
SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE
CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR AND THAT THE OPEN SPACE
TRACT WILL BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE TOTAL OPEN SPACE
REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. EXPLAIN THAT THE AREA’S
PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT PALETTE GREEN
LIST.
qu PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
y. MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
AND INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON
PAGE 121.
rv PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
z. MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
INFORMATION REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF
HACKBERRY” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST ON
PAGE 119.
sw PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM
aa. HEIGHT FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING
AND COPY IS 16 FEET…”
bb. PAGES 125-126, SECTION 11. SUSTAINABILITY: ADD LANGUAGE
REGARDING REGULAR WATER LEAK DETECTION AUDITS FOR
COMMON AREAS MANAGED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOA.
cc. PAGES 125-126, SECTION 11. SUSTAINABILITY: ADD LANGUAGE
TO REQUIRE EFFLUENT DELIVERY BACK TO THE CITY.
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
m. PAGES 126-127, SECTION 12. WATER: ADD LANGUAGE
REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN THE CITY’S HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION WATER EFFICIENCY PROGRAM.
ee. PAGES 126-127, SECTION 12. WATER: ADD LANGUAGE
REGARDING THE EPA WATERSENSE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
AND MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS. THIS SHOULD INCLUDE BUT
IS NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: LEAK DETECTION AUDITS;
WATERSENSE LABELED TOILETS, BATHROOM FAUCETS, AND
SHOWERHEADS; WATERSENSE LABELED IRRIGATION SYSTEM
COMPONENTS; LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPLETED BY A
WATERSENSE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL; AND FORMAL
CERTIFICATION AS A WATERSENSE HOME BY AN AUTHORIZED
HOME CERTIFYING ORGANIZATION.
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified
by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT
NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED
BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL
DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS
AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE
EROSION HAZARD SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH
CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION
IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH
TIMING OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY
THE DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
9. Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.
13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BY
EMAIL A MINIMUM OF 15 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
REVIEW MEETINGS WITH THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
DEPARTMENT, PLANNING HEARING OFFICER REQUESTS TO MODIFY
STIPULATIONS, OR ANY ZONING ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS. THE
NOTICE SHALL INCLUDE THE DATE, TIME AND LOCATION OF THE
MEETING/HEARING.
A. DR. GARY KIRKILAS: GARYKIRKILAS@GMAIL.COM
B. MEMBERS OF THE PHOENIX SONORAN PRESERVE AND
MOUNTAIN PARKS/PRESERVES COMMITTEE
C. VASHTI “TICE” SUPPLEE: VSUPPLEE25@GMAIL.COM
14. APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE
CONDITIONED UPON THE FINAL EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER WITHIN 24
MONTHS OF CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE OF
ZONE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE
EXECUTED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF
ANY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS. THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT SHALL AT A MINIMUM OUTLINE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
INITIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS WELL AS
FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ULTIMATE BUILDOUT OF
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTS.
Enclosures:
Verdin Drought Management Commitment
Approved: _____________________________________________
Alan Stephenson
Deputy City Manager/Planning and Development Director
DROUGHT MANAGEMENT Commitments
In June 2022, the City of Phoenix declared a Stage 1 Water Alert, which sets in motion an intensive
public education and information program centered around water conservation, sustainability and
management. A Stage 2 Water Warning is expected to be declared yet this year and will provide
authority for the City to impose water use reduction regulations.
Taylor Morrison’s proposed Verdin master planned community in North Phoenix has been designed
around a framework that makes Verdin a natural partner and model for the City with regard to
sustainable water conservation practices. As the City navigates a path to facilitate and support much
needed housing while also advancing the City’s drought management and water conservation goals,
Taylor Morrison’s Verdin community will establish a new standard for ‘water forward’ development
in North Phoenix.
Taylor Morrison has committed to the following water conservation and sustainability measures for
Verdin that will be regulated through the Verdin Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) and private
governance documents.
1. EPA WaterSense Certification. All homes within the Verdin community will be designed and
certified through the EPA WaterSense Certification program. Homes within Verdin will meet the
mandatory requirements for WaterSense labeling, including:
• Leak detection audits
• WaterSense labeled toilets, bathroom faucets and showerheads
• WaterSense labeled irrigation system components
• Landscape design completed by a WaterSense design professional
• Formal certification as a WaterSense home by an authorized Home Certifying
Organization
2. City of Phoenix Homeowners Association Water Efficiency Program. The homeowner’s
association for Verdin will participate in the City’s Homeowners Association Water Efficiency
Program.
3. National Wildlife Federation Certification. The Verdin community has been designed, from
the ground up, to achieve National Wildlife Federation (“NWF”) Certification for the community,
including that community common areas and open spaces will achieve Certified Wildlife Habitat
status. The NWF Certification, naturally, includes substantial water conservation and
management commitments that are embedded in the Verdin PUD zoning regulations.
4. Native Drought Tolerant Vegetation/Xeriscape Plans. The Verdin PUD contains a curated,
localized water-wise Sonoran Desert Plant Palette for use throughout the entire community,
created in partnership with local stakeholders and the National Wildlife Federation.
• Ultimately, more than 100 acres of preserved and revegetated common area open spaces
(21% of the project land area) will be protected habitats with native vegetation.
Verdin Water Commitments 6-21-22 1
• Landscaping in the front yards of all homes will be required to utilize the drought tolerant,
NWF Certified Verdin plant palette.
5. Irrigation Restrictions. The Verdin PUD includes design guidelines for undisturbed and
revegetated open space areas that call for restrictions on irrigation, limited maintenance,
prohibition on pesticides or herbicides, and restrictions on pruning. Over the long term, 75% of
the Verdin community common areas will be prohibited from having irrigation.
• Designated Preserved Open Areas (39.8 acres) will be preserved in a natural state with an
absolute prohibition on irrigation.
• Designated Revegetated Open Space Areas (63.3 acres) will be minimally irrigated to
establish revegetated plants, but then cut off from irrigation once plant materials are
established.
6. Irrigation and Use of Smart Controllers.
• Community common areas that are irrigated will be required to utilize smart irrigation
controllers that can be controlled remotely to promote water conservation.
• Automatic drip irrigation systems are required for all front yard landscaping.
• Automatic irrigation systems designed by a landscape architect or other similar certified
designer shall be required for all planting areas in front yards and common areas. Fixed
risers in such areas are prohibited.
• Areas requiring overhead spray shall be limited to turf areas and flower beds. All other
areas must use drip irrigation.
• Large overhead and drip irrigation systems should be zoned for exposure, topography
and varying water requirements of the plant material.
7. Water Leak Detection. Verdin common areas managed and maintained by the homeowner’s
association will undergo regular water leak detection audits to ensure the integrity and efficiency
of the irrigation system is maintained.
8. Turf Restrictions. The Verdin PUD contains turf restriction prohibitions that advance water
conservation goals and are a required element of the NWF Partnership.
• Turf is prohibited in all medians and public rights of way.
• Turf is prohibited within common areas adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve, community
edges and along wash corridors.
• Turf is prohibited within the front yards of all homes within Verdin. This restriction will be
enforced through the community design guidelines and CC&Rs.
• “Non-functional” turf is not allowed within the Verdin community.
• Turf within rear yards of all homes will be restricted such that no more than 20% of a
private lot rear yard could contain natural turf.
• Turf, where allowed, will not be planted on slopes in excess of 5%.
8. Effluent Reuse. All effluent generated from Verdin will be delivered back to the City for City use
through the Water Services Department sewer system.
Verdin Water Commitments 6-21-22 2
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-62-18-2) FROM S-1 DCOD (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY
DISTRICT), S-1 (RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT), AND
RE-35 DCOD (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT
CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 488.63-acre site located at the southwest
corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive in a portion of Sections 22
and 27, Township 5 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is
hereby changed from 144.82 acres of “S-1 DCOD” (Ranch or Farm Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay District), 333.57 acres of “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence
District), and 10.24 acres of “RE-35 DCOD” (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District) to “PUD” (Planned Unit Development).
Page 912
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Verdin PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this
request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped March 3, 2022, as modified by the
following stipulations:
a. Pages 6, 8, 26, and 28: Revise all references to the maximum density to
2.6 dwelling units per acre.
b. Pages 6, 8, 26, and 28: Revise all references to the maximum number
of units to 1,250 dwelling units.
c. Pages 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, and 136: Remove all
references to the “Single-Family Residential – Small Lot (SFR-3)” land
use district. Unit counts and percentages related to this removal shall be
updated accordingly.
d. Pages 20, 52, 61, 102, and 113: Revise all references to the width of the
multi-use trail easement along the Mesquite Wash corridor to 30-feet-
wide.
e. Pages 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, and 121: Revise all references to the “Approved Plant Palette” to
“Plant Palette”.
f. Pages 8-22, Section 2. Land Use Plan, and pages 97-123, Section 9.
Certified Open Space Design Guidelines: Add language regarding
conveyance of approximately 16 acres addressed in Stipulation No. 8.
There shall be a provision for both on site open space and the dedicated
16 acres to count towards total open space.
g. Page 16, Off-Site Connectivity: Add language regarding public trail
access easements provided for the Mesquite Wash corridor trail and
Page 913
community paseo paths, per Stipulation No. 6. The section shall
specifically note that the access easements will ensure permanent
public access and restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access through
the residential community to the Sonoran Preserve.
h. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. Page 35, Single-Family Land Use District Development Standards
Table: Add a row after Max. Dwelling Unit Density that reads “Maximum
Units: 1,250 dwelling units for the entire PUD area”.
j. Pages 36-37, Single-Family Land Use District Development Standards
Table: Add a footnote that refers to the development parcel allocation
table in Section 4.c. (Regulatory Standards & Land Use Districts –
Development Standards) for the maximum unit counts for each
development parcel.
k. Page 41, Section 6.1: Revise to read, “When not prohibited by City
Code, Section 31-13, primary ornamental entries no higher than 16-feet
are allowed…”
l. Page 41, Section 6.3.a: Add the following sentence under the existing
sentence: “Any walls or fencing along a preserve edge/MCFCD property
boundary, other than walls or fencing for individual residential lots, shall
be comprised of the barrier fencing type, which are designed with
sufficient openings to allow the regular passage of wildlife.”
m. Page 42, Section 6.3.B: Revise the reference to ‘a maximum 6-foot, 4-
inch high full view fencing” to ‘a maximum 5-foot high full view fencing’.
n. Page 46, Section 6.6: Change ‘14 feet’ to ‘12 feet’.
o. Pages 52-53, Section 2.C: Add language regarding public trail access
easements provided for the Mesquite Wash corridor trail and community
paseo paths, per Stipulation No. 6. The section should specifically note
that the access easements will ensure permanent public access and
restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access through the residential
community to the Sonoran Preserve.
p. Page 79-80, Section 5.A, Last bullet point: Add the following after the
first sentence: “The use of retaining walls in excess of 4 feet is
discouraged and should be limited to locations where necessary to
accommodate specific site topography.”
q. Pages 90-91, Section 6.H: Delete “Chilopsis Linearis – Desert Willow”
tree from the Green List and add it to the Yellow List trees on page 91.
Page 914
r. Pages 90 and 92, Section 6.H: Delete “Celtis Reticulata – Netleaf
Hackberry” shrub from the Yellow List and add it to the Green List
shrubs on page 90.
s. Page 101, Certified Area Open Space Types Exhibit: Update the exhibit
to include the 25-foot open space tract that will be provided along the
eastern boundary of the site as a certified area Type “B” – natural
revegetated area.
t. Page 105-108, Section 1.D.2: Add language regarding the minimum 25-
foot open space tract that will be provided along the eastern boundary of
the site to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor. Explain
that the area’s plant material will be from the Plant Palette Green List.
u. Pages 119 and 121, 1.E. Plant and Wildlife Relationship Matrix, Plant
Palette: Green List: Remove the image and information regarding
“Chilopsis Linearis – Desert Willow” and add to the Plant Palette: Yellow
List on page 121.
v. Pages 119 and 122, 1.E. Plant and Wildlife Relationship Matrix, Plant
Palette: Yellow List: Remove the image information regarding “Celtis
Reticulata – Netleaf Hackberry” and add to the Plant Palette: Green List
on page 119.
w. Page 123, Section 10.1.B: Revise to read, “The maximum height for
primary ornamental entry sign lettering and copy is 16 feet…”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified
by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
Page 915
6. The developer shall provide public trail access easements for the Mesquite
Wash corridor trail and community paseo paths that provide connection to the
Sonoran Preserve as depicted on Exhibit 6, Pedestrian Circulation Plan, in the
development narrative, as modified and approved by the Parks and Recreation
Department and Planning and Development Department. The public access
shall be designed to restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access, as approved
by the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and Development
Department. The location and design of trail connections shall be coordinated
with the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and Development
Department.
7. A minimum 12-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be constructed within a 30-
foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the Mesquite Wash in
accordance with Section 429 of the City of Phoenix MAG supplemental detail,
as modified to address wash corridor constraints and approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
8. The developer shall convey approximately 16 acres located at the southeast
corner of the site within the erosion hazard setback area along the Cave Creek
Wash corridor, as generally shown on Exhibit 11 of the development narrative,
to the City of Phoenix for inclusion in the Sonoran Preserve, as modified and
approved by the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and
Development Department. The final acreage and configuration of the property
to be conveyed, along with timing of the conveyance, shall be mutually agreed
upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department, and Planning
and Development Department.
9. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
Page 916
13. The developer shall notify the following individuals by email a minimum of 15
days prior to any preliminary site plan review meetings with the Planning and
Development Department, Planning Hearing Officer requests to modify
stipulations, or any zoning adjustment requests. The notice shall include the
date, time and location of the meeting/hearing.
a. Dr. Gary Kirkilas: garykirkilas@gmail.com
b. Members of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Mountain
Parks/Preserves Committee
c Vashti “Tice” Supplee: vsupplee25@gmail.com
14. Approval of the Planned Unit Development shall be conditioned upon the final
execution of a development agreement between the City and the developer
within 24 months of City Council approval of this change of zone. Additionally,
the development agreement shall be executed prior to final site plan approval
and issuance of any grading and drainage permits. The development
agreement shall at a minimum outline the requirements for initial improvements
to Sonoran Desert Drive, as well as financial contributions for the ultimate
buildout of Sonoran Desert Drive, as modified and approved by the Street
Transportation and Planning and Development departments.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
Page 917
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 918
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-62-18-2
PARCEL NO. 1:
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 3
EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 3
EAST, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22;
THENCE NORTH 00° 20' 16" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION
22, A DISTANCE OF 2,501.66 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 90° 00' 00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,642.12 FEET TO THE
NORTH-SOUTH MID-SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 22;
THENCE NORTH 00° 28' 49" EAST, ALONG SAID MID-SECTION LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 141.23 FEET TO THE EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE OF SAID
SECTION 22;
THENCE NORTH 89° 48' 35" EAST, ALONG SAID MID-SECTION, LINE A
DISTANCE OF 2,641.83 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 22;
THENCE SOUTH 00° 20' 16" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION
22, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NO. 2:
THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF
THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA;
EXCEPT ALL THE COAL AND OTHER MINERALS, AS RESERVED IN THE
PATENT. (AFFECTS THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
27).
EXCEPT ALL MINERALS IN SAID LAND AS RESERVED TO THE UNITED
STATES IN PATENT; AND
EXCEPTING ALL URANIUM, THORIUM, OR OTHER MATERIAL WHICH IS OR
MAY BE DETERMINED TO BE PECULIARLY ESSENTIAL TO THE PRODUCTION
Page 919
OF FISSIONABLE MATERIALS, WHETHER OR NOT OF COMMERCIAL VALUE
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF AUGUST 1, 1946 (60 STAT.
755), AS SET FORTH IN THE PATENT ON SAID LAND. (AFFECTS THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2).
Page 920
Page 921
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-62-18-2
Verdin PUD
March 9, 2022
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 2022
Request From: S-1 DCOD (144.82 acres), S-1 (333.57 acres),
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To: PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 acres),
PUD (333.57 acres)
Proposed Use: Planned Unit Development to allow single-
family residential
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
Current: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units
per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5
dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain,
General Plan Land Use Map
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Designation
Proposed (GPA-DSTV-1-18-2): Residential 2 to
3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain,
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
Page 922
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Street Map Sonoran Desert
Major Arterial 80-foot south half street
Classification Drive
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The proposed development creates a residential community at a density of 3.0 dwelling
units per acre. The site will incorporate open edge treatments, various open space
areas, and connectivity to the surrounding Sonoran Preserve areas. The protection of
native vegetation and character of the area is consistent with the North Land Use Plan
and the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, which both emphasize preservation of desert
character.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of housing
types and densities where appropriate within each village that support a broad
range of lifestyles.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment and concurrent rezoning case
will allow for single-family residential development options adjacent to a major arterial
street and in close proximity to the North Gateway Core and Cave Creek Road. The
various lot sizes and single-family housing products proposed in the development will
support a range of lifestyles for Phoenix residents.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES & SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposed PUD narrative includes standards for desert-appropriate vegetation and
trees strategically located to provide shade and visual enhancement throughout the
community. The PUD has also fostered a collaboration with the National Wildlife
Federation to establish design guidelines to integrate and preserve plantings and
existing trees in the development. The landscaping standards in the PUD will provide
significant shade for pedestrians and will help reduce the urban heat island effect within
the development and in the greater Desert View area.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
North Land Use Plan: See Background Item No. 4.
Page 923
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 15.
Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 16.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 17.
Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 18.
Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 19.
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant S-1, S-1 DCOD, RE-35 DCOD
North (Across
Phoenix Sonoran
Sonoran Desert RE-35 DCOD
Preserve
Drive)
Vacant, Phoenix
West RE-35, S-1
Sonoran Preserve
Cave Creek Wash,
East Vacant (State Trust RE-35
Land)
Phoenix Sonoran
South RE-35
Preserve
Page 924
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Background/Issues/Analysis
REQUEST
1. This is a request to rezone
a 488.63-gross acre site
located at the southwest
corner of the 24th Street
alignment and Sonoran
Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD (Ranch or Farm
Proposed
Residence, Desert
Character Overlay District), PUD
S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence), RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character
Overlay District) to PUD
(Planned Unit
Development) to allow a Zoning Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix
single-family residential Planning and Development Department
development, not to
exceed 1,420 units.
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
2. The site has General Plan Land Use Map designations of Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres), Preserves /
Floodplain (23.24 acres), Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres). The
proposal is not consistent with these designations and, as the site exceeds 10
acres in size, the applicant has filed a General Plan Amendment, GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2, as a companion case to this rezoning request. The GPA request is for
Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre (451.13 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres), Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay removal (474.37 acres). Staff is recommending approval as
the designation will allow development at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per
acre.
Page 925
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
EXISTING PROPOSED
Existing and Proposed General Land Use Designation Maps, Source: City of Phoenix
Planning and Development Department
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is designated Future
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre.
The area directly east of the subject site is designated Preserves/Floodplain.
South of the subject site is designated Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space.
West of the subject site is designated Publicly Owned Parks/Open Space and
open space owned by the ASLD designated Future Parks/Open Space or 1
dwelling unit per acre.
Page 926
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
EXISTING CONDITIONS & SURROUNDING ZONING
3. The subject site is currently vacant and zoned S-1 DCOD (Ranch or Farm
Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence),
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character Overlay
District). The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
Aerial Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
NORTH
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is Sonoran Desert Drive and
the Sonoran Preserve. Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a major arterial
roadway and is an important east-west alignment between Interstate 17 and
northeast Phoenix. This roadway alignment is proposed to have a total of six
lanes, three in each direction. The Sonoran Preserve consists of over 9,600
acres of relatively undisturbed natural areas in North Phoenix with various trail
connectivity throughout. Additionally, this area is owned by the Arizona State
Land Department (ASLD).
EAST
East of the subject site is Cave Creek Wash and its associated floodplain. The
floodplain also encroaches onto the southeast portion of the subject site.
Page 927
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
SOUTH
South of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation
Area. The Cave Buttes Recreation Area is a park that overseen by the
Maricopa County Flood Control District. This area contains a number of dams
that control flooding from washes in the general area.
WEST
West of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve owned by the City of Phoenix
and vacant land owned by the ASLD.
AREA PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITATIVES
4. North Land Use Plan
The project site is
located within the
boundaries of the North
Land Use Plan. The
North Land Use Plan
was created in 1997 with
Subject Site
the purpose of
establishing growth
patterns while
preserving the desert
landscape and character
of the area. The plan
recognizes the
importance that the rural
character and lifestyle
play in determining
appropriate land use
densities. North Land Use Plan Map, Source: City of Phoenix
The northern portion of Planning and Development Department
the site is within the
North Land Use Plan
and the plan designates that area as 0 to 1.2 dwelling units per acre. The
proposed site will have a maximum of 1,420 units across the approximately 488-
acre site to ensure compatibility with the character of the North Land Use Plan.
The development also supports concepts in the North Land Use Plan by
preserving Cave Creek Wash’s natural flow and leaving that portion of the site
as natural open space. Additionally, the development will provide open edge
treatments adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and blend the development edges
with the surrounding desert environment.
Page 928
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
PUD PROPOSAL
5. The proposal was developed utilizing the Planned Unit Development zoning
district. The PUD is intended to create a built environment that is superior to
what is produced through conventional zoning districts and design guidelines.
Using a collaborative and comprehensive approach, an applicant authors and
proposes standards and guidelines that are tailored to the context of a site on a
case by case basis. Where the PUD Development Narrative is silent on a
requirement, the applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions will be applied.
6. Land Use Plan: The PUD will
be a master-planned residential
community with a maximum of
1,420 dwelling units at an
overall density of 3.0 dwelling
units per acre. The
development will be a collection
of single-family neighborhoods
with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian
network connected to the
Sonoran Preserve and
surrounding desert environment.
The development will be divided
into three Master Development
Parcels ranging from
Conceptual Land Use Plan, Source: Gammage &
approximately 130 to 180 acres. Burnham
Each development parcel
represents an anticipated
development phase. The
development parcels will then
be divided into individual
residential neighborhood units,
which will range from 20 to 40
acres in size. Each
neighborhood unit will include a
mix of lot sizes, densities, and
home product types.
Master Development Parcel Exhibit, Source:
Gammage & Burnham
Page 929
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
7. Permitted Uses: The PUD proposes to allow single-family detached dwellings,
single-family attached dwellings, guesthouses, a community center, and model
homes by right. The primary uses for the community center are a place of
meeting, social activities, active or passive indoor and outdoor recreation and
entertainment, indoor and outdoor cooking areas and facilities, and a business
center. Accessory uses to the community center include alcoholic beverage or
food sales, convenience market, and snack bar/restaurant. Temporary uses to
the community center are community or special events, promotional events,
farmers markets, and mobile food vending and vendors, subject to Section 708
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Accessory uses and structures are to comply
with its respective section in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
8. Development Standards: The PUD sets forth several development standards
that only apply to the non-hillside areas of the PUD. All other areas of the PUD
will be subject to all Hillside Development Standards of the Zoning Ordinance,
which would override any of the PUD standards where conflicts arise.
Below is a summary of the development standards proposed in the PUD
development narrative for development parcel allocation and single-family land
use districts, which can be found on pages 28, 35, and 36 of the PUD
Development Narrative.
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION
Master
Master Maximum
Development Maximum
Development Allowed Land Use Districts Allowed
Parcel Unit Count
Parcel Percentage
Acreage
Small Lot (SFR-3) 25%
A 154 +/- 550 Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 75%
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 50%
Small Lot (SFR-3) 25%
B 168 +/- 600 Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 75%
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 50%
Small Lot (SFR-3) 25%
C 166 +/- 600 Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 75%
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 50%
Total Gross
488 +/-
Acreage
Maximum Overall Unit Count 1,420
Maximum Overall Density 3.0 du/ac
Page 930
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development
SFR-3 SFR-5 SFR-7 SFR-9 SFR-14
Standard
Minimum Lot
Area (square 3,000 5,000 7,000 9,000 14,000
feet)
Minimum Lot
40 feet 45 feet 55 feet 65 feet 90 feet
Width
Minimum Lot
None
Depth
Minimum Perimeter Building Setbacks
Sonoran
Desert 15 feet
Drive
Collector
15 feet
ROW
Minimum Interior Building Setbacks
Front 10 feet
Garage 18 feet, from back of sidewalk
Rear 5 feet 15 feet 20 feet
Street Side 5 feet 10 feet
0 feet, 10
Non-Street foot
5 feet
Side building
separation
Maximum
2 stories, 30 feet
Building Height
The proposed development standards allow for various types of residential
development throughout the community to ensure diversity and a variety of
lifestyle choices for residents.
9. Connectivity to the Sonoran Preserve: The Verdin development will provide
proximity and access to significant desert amenities, such as the Sonoran
Preserve, through trail connections, paseos, edge open space areas, and view
corridors. The PUD also provides various design guidelines and development
standards ensuring the project will integrate naturally with the surrounding
desert environment.
The property is adjacent to properties that are part of or targeted for acquisition
as part of the Sonoran Preserve. The developer and the City of Phoenix’s
Parks and Recreation Department intend to ensure opportunities for public
access to the Preserve. The development will provide public walk-in trailheads
and connections at various locations along the Preserve edge and Verdin’s
property boundaries. The final locations will be determined by the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Page 931
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Additionally, a public trail will be
developed along the Mesquite Wash
Corridor, linking the north and south
halves of the Sonoran Preserve. At
the north and south ends of the
Mesquite Wash Corridor, the PUD
will provide public trailheads at
defined points of entry. The
Mesquite Wash Corridor trail will
include a 12-foot-wide natural
surface multi-use trail within a 20-
foot-wide public multi-use trail
easement. Conceptual Trailhead Example, Source:
Gammage & Burnham
Internal to the development there
will be minimum 40-foot-wide
landscaped pedestrian paseo corridors with 6 to 8 foot wide paths located
between neighborhood units. The Paseo Corridors will extend from the internal
pedestrian circulation system to the aforestated trailheads.
Trails will be provided in limited areas near the property perimeter where future
connections to the Sonoran Preserve are anticipated. These trails will be
comprised of a natural surface no greater than 4 feet in width. The final
locations of the connection points will be determined in coordination with the
Parks and Recreation Department.
Per the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan,
the development intends to integrate
into the larger desert character by
having open edges along the perimeter
of the community. The open edge plan
will promote visual and physical
connectivity to and from the property,
maintain washes and other significant
landforms, and protect flora and fauna
in the area. A minimum of 60% of the
open edge treatment will be provided
along the preserve edge.
Edge Openness Plan, Source: Gammage &
Burnham
Page 932
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
10. Landscape Standards: The PUD outlines landscaping standards that exceed
the requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Below is a summary of
the landscape standards proposed in the PUD development narrative for the
single-family land use districts, which can be found on pages 35 and 36 of the
PUD Development Narrative.
SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
Development
SFR-3 SFR-5 SFR-7 SFR-9 SFR-14
Standard
Minimum Common Landscape Setbacks
Sonoran
Desert Drive 30 feet average, 15 feet minimum
ROW
Arterial/
Collector 15 feet average, 10 feet minimum
ROW
All Other
Perimeter
No requirement
Property
Lines
Common Area
(per Master
20% gross
Development
Parcel)
Common Area
(per
10% gross
Neighbirhood
Unit)
Landscape
Standars
Perimeter common: Trees spaces a maximum of 20 to 30 feet
Adjacent to
on center or in equivalent groupings
Sonoran Desert
Drive
Neighborhood Entry Units will provide a detached 6-foot-wide public sidewalk
with enhanced landscaping and shade trees planted at an interval of 1 tree per
25 feet or in equivalent groupings. A minimum of three 3-inch caliper shade
trees will be planted on either side of the Neighborhood Entry Unit. Any
additional trees shall be a combination of 1-inch caliper (maximum 25%) and 2-
inch caliper (maximum 75%) trees.
Local street sidewalks will be 5 feet in width and attached on both sides of
local streets, except in locations where adjacent to common open space areas.
To encourage shading of sidewalks, shade trees shall be planted with the front
yard of all residential lots. Each shade tree shall be a minimum 24 inch box
tree.
Page 933
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
11. Open Space: Verdin has partnered with the National Wildlife Federation to
establish guidelines to maintain natural habitats and native species within the
community. The collaboration will use a minimum of 80% native plants, develop
habitat management plans for Verdin’s Homeowner’s Association(s), support
monarch butterfly recovery efforts, and design and build Early Childhood Health
Outdoors playscapes.
The use of native plants creates an environment that is familiar to wildlife
species and consistent with what is found in the natural desert environment.
Natural open space areas will be designated for the purposed of maintaining
sensitive habitat and natural desert character. These open areas will be marked
with signage and fencing to reduce human impact and promote property edges
that blend seamlessly with the adjacent desert environment. Verdin has
identified unique area types that will promote the above principles.
Certified Area Open Space Types, Source: Gammage & Burnham
Type A, Preserved Habitat, areas will emphasize the preservation of existing
natural, undisturbed desert. Type B, Natural Revegetated, areas are those that
require disturbances, but are revegetated with the intent to match the plant
densities and character of the natural desert. Salvaged and nursery-grown
native plant materials will be utilized for the revegetation and temporary
irrigation of these materials will be allowed to support the re-establishment.
Type C, Maintained, areas will be common open space for recreational uses
and/or may require ongoing aesthetic maintenance.
Page 934
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
12. Design Guidelines: The PUD sets forth an extensive list of design
requirements for neighborhood units, streets, pedestrian connectivity, open
space, amenities, grading and drainage, and utilities. The PUD also integrates
a number of design considerations based on the Desert Character Overlay
District standards, including a sensitive transituon from open space to
developed areas, conservation of washes and wildlife habitats, and use of
native plants. There are also architectural standards for elevations, windows,
doors, and roofs. These standards and design features ensure that a high-
quality development is provided on site with a diversity in elevation
combinations. Architectural standards includes a variety in traditional roof
forms, outdoor living spaces, signature design elements, articulation, pop-outs,
and recesses. The complete language regarding design guidelines can be
found on pages 47 through 122.
13. Amenities: The PUD proposes two
community amenity areas and parks
and common open spaces equitably
distributed throughout the community.
A primary community amenity area will
include a private community center and
outdoor recreation facilities. Other
primary community resident amenities
may include a pool, play area, even and
gathering lawn, patio with fire pit, yoga,
meditation area, and outdoor lounge
area/kitchen. A secondary community
Conceptual Community Area, Source:
open space is proposed to include a
Gammage & Burnham
ramada, play area, demonstration
garden, and lawn seating area.
Verdin will also include neighborhood parks that can provide a combination of
active and passive uses at a smaller scale. The neighborhood parks will be
located centrally to each neighborhood unit.
14. Signage: Signs within the PUD will comply with Section 705 of the Zoning
Ordinance with some modifications regarding ground and combination signs.
The Primary Ornamental Entry Signs will be provided near the primary entrance
and/or along the primary collector. A maximum of two primary ornamental entry
signs are permitted in the development. These signs will be 12-feet maximum
in height, but non-supporting structures such as towers, columns, and trims may
be up to a maximum of 30 feet in height. The maximum sign lettering area is
100 square feet per sign.
The Neighborhood Unit Signs and Secondary Ornamental Entry Signs are
freestanding ground mounted signs located on or incorporated into a solid base,
or wall mounted signs. There will be a maximum of two single-faced
Page 935
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
neighborhood unit identification signs or one double-faced neighborhood unit
identification sign allowed per entrance to a neighborhood unit. The maximum
height for these signs is 8 feet, including embellishments, architecture, walls, or
other similar features. The maximum sign lettering is 44 square feet per sign.
CITYWIDE STUDIES AND POLICIES
15. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on street frontages should be detached from
the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide
thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. The
development will provide detached sidewalks along primary and secondary
collectors, adjacent to Neighborhood Unit entries, and adjacent to common
open spaces with contiguous local street frontages greater than 50 feet and 15-
feet in depth. The proposed PUD narrative includes standards for desert-
appropriate vegetation and trees strategically located to provide shade and
visual enhancement throughout the community. The PUD has also fostered a
collaboration with the National Wildlife Federation to establish design guidelines
to integrate and preserve plantings and existing trees in the development. The
landscaping standards in the PUD will provide significant shade for pedestrians
and will help reduce the urban heat island effect within the development and in
the greater Desert View area.
16. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide
an accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such
as bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. The proposed PUD sets forth
standards that will improve the pedestrian environment, including landscaped
paseos and trails, detached sidewalks, tree shade cover, and shaded open
space and amenity areas.
17. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure.
The Development Narrative states that an extensive pedestrian network of
walking and bicycle paths will be available for resident use in order to create a
sustainable and inviting community. Collector roadways in the development will
include the construction of detached 8-foot-wide public sidewalks, including
bicycle lanes. Additionally, the community open spaces will be connected
through a comprehensive system of pedestrian and bicycle trails.
Page 936
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
18. Housing Phoenix
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan.
This plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of
housing with a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through
increased housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes.
Phoenix’s rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a
need for over 163,000 new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply
relative to demand are a primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The
proposed development will provide a maximum of 1,420 units, which will be a
mix of single-family and multifamily units. These proposed units support the
Housing Phoenix Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by
2030 and contributes to a variety of housing types that will address the supply
shortage.
19. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a
goal to become a zero waste city, as part of the City’s overall 2050
Environmental Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this
is to improve and expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs.
Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to
encourage the provision of recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and
mixed use developments meeting certain criteria. The Development Narrative
states that recycling receptacles will be provided and a sustainable recycling
program will be actively pursued and supported for all single-family
development.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
20. At the time the staff report was written staff had received 82 letters in opposition
and 6 letters in support of the proposal.
Letters in opposition expressed the following concerns:
• Current road infrastructure is at capacity. Additional homes will increase
traffic and decrease resident safety.
• The preserve area needs to be maintained as is for hiking, biking,
walking, trail running, and other outdoor activities.
• Development will have a negative impact on the area’s natural flora and
fauna.
• The proposal should maintain the requirements for the Desert Character
Overlay District.
• Density/number of units is too high.
• Zoning should remain as S-1.
• Additional homes will result in water resource issues.
• Sonoran Desert Drive should remain a scenic corridor.
• The proposed development does not match the character of the area.
Page 937
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
• Additional development will result in further strain on the school district.
• These is a lack of amenities to support the development.
Letters in support discussed the following items:
• Density at 3 dwelling units per acre is reasonable for the area.
• The proposal will provide additional housing, which is needed in the area.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
21. The Parks and Recreation Department provided comments indicating that the
Department would want to purchase the parcel to the east of the development,
but did not have a trailhead planned for the site and did not foresee the need for
connection from Verdin at this time.
22. The Street Transportation Department provided the following comments:
• The developer is required to complete a Traffic Impact Study to the City
for the development. Additionally, the developer shall submit Master
Street Design and Phasing Plants for each Development Unit. This is
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 and 3.
• Public Roadways shall meet appropriate Storm Water Design Manual
standards for wash crossings. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4.
• The developer shall provide the appropriate construction for right-of-way
within and adjacent to the development. This is addressed in Stipulation
No. 5.
23. The Water Services Department commented that the closest water and sewer
mains are within Cave Creek Road. The Department stated that new water
main extensions will be required at the time of development and particular
pressure zones will require private booster pumps. The Department stated that
depending on the timing for the development, the development can either flow
to the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant or to the Cave Creek Water
Reclamation Plant. The developer may also be required to upsize or provide a
relief sewer line to portions of the existing sewer main within Cave Creek Road
to accommodate the increased flows.
24. The Floodplain Management Division of the Public Works Department has
indicated that the parcel is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), as
designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The
division indicated that no encroachment is allowed in the floodway without
hydrologic and hydraulic analysis showing no rise in water surface elevation and
increase in the special flood hazard boundaries. The division also indicated that
the lowest floor of all structures constructed in the SFHA shall be a minimum of
Page 938
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
one foot above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The lowest adjacent grade to
the structure must be a minimum of at or above the BFE. Additionally, no
basements are allowed in residential structures located in a SFHA.
25. The Fire Department indicated that they do not anticipate any problems with the
referenced case. Additionally, site and buildings shall comply with the Phoenix
Fire Code. The current water supply is also unknown, but will be required to
meet fire flow requirements.
OTHER
26. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive.
If further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site
and immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous
archaeological projects have been conducted within this project area, it is
recommended that archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be
conducted. Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations may be
necessary based upon the results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must
make this determination in consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist.
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery
and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and
allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation
Nos. 6 through 9.
27. Development and use of the site are subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.
Other formal action such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.
Findings
1. The proposed PUD is located directly adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and
includes standards that ensure appropriate transitions from the development to
adjacent preserve areas.
2. The proposal balances the need for additional housing, while retaining and
preserving the desert landscape throughout the development, as outlined in the
North Land Use Plan and Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
3. The proposal includes several development standards, such as increased open
edge conditions, increased common area, and design guidelines that exceed
conventional Zoning Ordinance standards.
Page 939
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Stipulations
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:
a. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant analysis
for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as 7th Street
and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all additional
dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by the
approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
7. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
Page 940
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
Writer
Julianna Pierre
March 9, 2022
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Community correspondence (111 pages)
Verdin PUD date stamped March 3, 2022
Page 941
RE-35
E SONORAN DESERT DR
Desert Maintenance
Character A Overlay
S-1 District
S-1
Desert Maintenance
Character B
Overlay District
I Feet
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
DYNAMITE BLVD
47,000 23,500 0 47,000 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
Z-62-18 PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
SR-101
BLACK MTN PKY
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
FROM:
S-1 DCOD (144.82 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
10/16/2018 S-1 (333.57 a.c.)
Z-62-18 REVISION DATES:
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 a.c.)
10/17/2018 10/22/2018
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET 10/19/2018 12/01/2022
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
TO:
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 a.c.)
488.63 Acres QS 52-31, QS 52-32
QS 52-33, QS 53-32 Q-9 PUD (333.57 a.c)
QS 53-33, QS 54-32, QS 54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD, S-1, RE-35 DCOD 145, 333, 11 N/A, N/A, 13
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD), PUD 186 (465), 1,000; Not to exceed 1,420 overall N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-62-18 _Nov_2021_Update.mxd
Page 942
RE-35
E SONORAN DESERT DR
Desert Maintenance
Character A Overlay
S-1 District
S-1
Desert Maintenance
Character B
Overlay District
m apse rv ic es@ p hoe nix . go v
I Feet
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
DYNAMITE BLVD
47,000 23,500 0 47,000 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
Z-62-18 PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
SR-101
BLACK MTN PKY
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
FROM:
S-1 DCOD (144.82 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
10/16/2018 S-1 (333.57 a.c.)
Z-62-18 REVISION DATES:
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 a.c.)
10/17/2018 10/22/2018
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET 10/19/2018 12/01/2022
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
TO:
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 a.c.)
488.63 Acres QS 52-31, QS 52-32
QS 52-33, QS 53-32 Q-9 PUD (333.57 a.c)
QS 53-33, QS 54-32, QS 54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD, S-1, RE-35 DCOD 145, 333, 11 N/A, N/A, 13
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD), PUD 186 (465), 1,000; Not to exceed 1,420 overall N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-62-18 _Nov_2021_Update.mxd
Page 943
From: Jo Ann Snyder
To: sdemmitt@gblaw.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Case # Z62-18;GPA-DSTV-1-18-1 and ZTA5-18
Date: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:38:03 AM
In response to your notification letter dated 10/12—we object to the rezoning of this area to
accommodate more housing.
Ronald Spicer and Jo Ann Snyder Spicer
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Page 944
From: Scott Coll
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Phoenix Sonoran Preserve - Taylor Morrison/Macewan480 Rezoning Proposal
Date: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 1:57:16 PM
Hello Desert View VPC,
Just wanted to share that I hope there will be a vote to NOT Rezone a portion of the Phoenix
Sonoran Preserve to allow for a large scale neighborhood build to be completed within its
borders. My reasons for this hope are as follows:
1) Current road infrastructure: Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd is already at capacity for
the surrounding neighborhoods that are already built and/or under construction on the Cave
Creek side and the North Valley PKWY side of the Preserve. Two New Large neighborhoods
within 8-9 miles of this proposed neighborhood, USAA (located at Happy Valley/19th
Ave/North Valley Pkwy) and Sky Crossing (also being built by Taylor Morrison and other
builders located at Deer Valley and Black Mountain Blvd) will already clog access to
roadways that would be used to access this neighborhood and the Preserve (North Valley
Pkwy, 19th Ave, 7th St, Deer Valley, Tatum Rd, Pinnacle Peak Rd, Black Mountain Blvd,
Cave Creek). I feel modifying, by expansion, the existing Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd
navigating through the Preserve would drastically take away from any tranquility, and limit
even more the Natural/Organic Desert Landscape we have there now.
2) Night Sky Viewing: Would become non-existent with the increased vehicle traffic of the
new neighborhood. You'd have home-owners, and then any friends/family that visit and also
delivery traffic bringing light pollution and vehicle pollution to the Preserve area.There is also
the street lights and home ambient lighting from that many homes, approximately 1,420, that
will effect Desert Flora/Fauna and their way of life. Road noise as well from so much increase
in traffic could also cause an issue.
3) Safety: 3A: I've already observed in the last year multiple accidents at the Northbound
intersection of Cave Creek and Sonoran Desert Dr due to a backup of vehicles trying to turn
left on to Sonoran Desert Dr. I come home this way every day from work and have noticed a
substantial increase in traffic as far back as the AZ-51/Loop 101/Black Mtn Blvd interchange.
Then the same down Deer Valley or Pinnacle Peak, and then Cave Creek. Cave Creek
subsequently then backs up at Tatum due to the left lane being stopped due to a number of
vehicles turning left at Sonoran Desert Dr and terrible accidents occur due to people not
observing the slow down or being impatient. The severity of these accidents on Cave Creek,
and subsequent difficulty for First Responders to access the area, then cut off access altogether
to the Preserve and cause a massive re-route in traffic, if even possible.
3B: Cyclists will also have more risk along Cave Creek/Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd
due to increased vehicle traffic with this new neighborhood. I know City of Phoenix is
working to expand bike routes across the city, but this area is vital to the cycling community
by providing easily navigable routes that connect and are, for now, easily seen by motorists
driving in these areas to prevent any accidents from occurring.
3C: Adding more people to a Preserve environment will then make the Preserve itself unsafe.
It will become subject to vandalism from littering, illegal trespassing by motorized vehicles, or
even walking/hiking on unapproved trails (trail-blazing) and ruining crucial desert life that
takes years to grow. We need to Tread Lightly (https://www.treadlightly.org/) with this
proposed neighborhood and think of the lasting effects that it could bring, not only to us and
Page 945
our current daily living, but also the flora/fauna trying to live in the Preserve too.
4) Alternatives to a Neighborhood: Just because it is Private Land, doesn't mean you need to
grant them the Rezoning change to build a new neighborhood. If a Community Center was
proposed that educates persons on Desert life, and what it means to preserve this Natural
environment and improve our way of life (educational) by teaching of the past environment
that was Phoenix and the sprawling desert oasis and mountains from 100 years ago, that would
be something worth certainly entertaining for our section of the Valley. There isn't very many,
if any, of these types of facilities in our North Gateway Community that I'm aware of that aim
at educating our youth, and even ourselves, of what is around us and also what used to be
around us regarding the environment. A Desert Mountain Museum in this area would be a
welcome alternative rather than another large neighborhood decreasing our Desert Mountain
Landscape.
Hopefully I haven't ranted too long, and this letter will help aid in your decision to NOT
approve of the Rezoning of this section of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. This letter has also
been forwarded to Vice Mayor Jim Waring, Phoenix City Council District 2 Representative.
Kindest Regards,
Scott Coll
Sonoran Commons Community Member
Page 946
From: Adam Grant
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: FW: Rezoning of PSP
Date: Friday, November 09, 2018 8:00:30 AM
From: Jim Waring [mailto:Jim@JimWaring.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 1:14 PM
To: Adam Grant; Brian T. Schmitt ;
Nicholas T Cappellini
Subject: Fwd: Rezoning of PSP
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: hporourke@gmail.com
Date: November 8, 2018 at 8:48:11 AM MST
To: info@jimwaring.com
Subject: Rezoning of PSP
Hi!
I do NOT support the rezoning of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve to allow for the
addition of more homes.
Respectfully your constituent,
Holly O’Rourke
Page 947
From: Jean Ann Rippe
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Phoenix Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, November 08, 2018 9:29:53 AM
Good morning,
My name is Jean Ann and I am a resident of Phoenix. The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is my
favorite place in the city to escape the craziness of daily life. I am writing you to ask you to
please NOT recommend the rezoning of the PSP. I appreciate your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Jean Ann
Page 948
From: Trudy Taylor
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Mac Ewen 480. Taylor Morrison
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 10:30:39 AM
I am most concerned with the proposed development near Sonoran Preserve
Where are these builders getting the water????
I think we are having far too many developments in the north valley
We enjoy biking and hiking from the Apache trailhead and it is most disconcerting to see the beautiful view being
marred by builders
Please save our preserves and open spaces!!!
Thank you
Trudy Taylor
Sent from my iPad
Page 949
From: Gary Kirkilas II
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve Rezoning and Desert Character Overlay District
Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 6:15:42 PM
Hello Desert View Planning Committee,
My name is Dr. Gary Kirkilas and I am a pediatrician at Phoenix Children's
Hospital. I am also a Phoenix Park Steward for the Sonoran Desert Preserve. I was
very disheartened to see that Taylor Morrison is asking to rezone 488 acres of
privately owned land from a S-1 to PUD so that they can develop a high density
housing development. It is equally disturbing that they are seeking to modify and
remove the Desert Character Overlay District for over 638 acres! As you may be
aware the Sonoran Desert Master Plan was developed by in 1998 and took over 10
years of collaborated work with the Phoenix Parks Dept and ASU to develop. The
Master Plan called for low density housing developments and to retain the Desert
Character Overlay District.
Allowing this rezoning to pass as well as modifying/removal of the Desert
Character Overlay District will drastically change the look and feel of this beautiful
Desert Preserve.
There are logistic concerns as well to this development. Several citizens who live in
the area are already witnessing traffic congestion along Sonoran Desert Drive and
Dove Valley Road. Adding the proposed 1400 homes to the mix will only worsen
the traffic situation even further....leaving a headache for citizens and our elect
officials to deal with once Taylor Morrisson has move on to another project.
I beg you to reconsider allowing the rezoning and removal for the Desert Character
Overlay District. Once the development begins the Desert Preserve will never look
or feel the same way again. I would be happy to discuss further or meet with you in
person.
Most Sincerely,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas
Page 950
From: Sue Pierce
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Proposed Dense Residential Development by Taylor Morrison Along Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 12:41:58 PM
Dear Desert View Village Members,
I am emailing you to express my concerns regarding a proposed development by Taylor
Morrison along Sonoran Desert Drive. I have many objections to this possible development
which I hope in the future we will be able to discuss in person or on the phone. However, for
now, let me begin with a discussion of traffic issues.
I live in Sonoran Foothills in a community called Desert Enclave. We have one entrance into
our community and that is from Dove Valley Road. Dove Valley Road at that point goes from a
four- lane road to a two-lane road with traffic going east and west.
During each work day, Monday through Friday, rush hour traffic (7:00 am – 9:00 am and 4:30
pm – 6:30 pm approximately) causes a long line of bumper to bumper vehicles to form making
entry onto Dove Valley Road difficult and at times dangerous. We have counted as many as
100 cars in a line during those times and have both pictures and videos of this traffic to share.
The addition of a dense residential development to the east near Apache Trailhead would only
complicate the problem. The developer’s attorney noted that they have some money in the
budget to improve traffic in the immediate area around Apache Trailhead but that would have
no positive impact on roadways in our area. The extension of the 303 East from Highway 17 to
Cave Creek Road could be a solution but it is my understanding funds for that project have not
been allocated nor will be in the near future.
It is my request that you support us in opposing this development. If you would like to discuss
it in greater detail, I am available at your convenience.
Thank you,
Sue Pierce
Sue Pierce
Founder/CEO
Pierce Energy Planning
(480) 773-0035 | sue@energyplanning.org
Please consider the environment before printing.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and
may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If
Page 951
you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error,
please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or
storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
Page 952
From: Blake Austin
Subject: Apache Wash Trails - New Homes Concern
Date: Saturday, December 15, 2018 1:41:19 PM
I am writing this email to voice my concern for the proposed plans with Taylor Morrison to
build 1400 new homes and jeopardize more of our beautiful mountain biking and hiking
community.
Please DENY Taylor Morrison.
Thank you,
Blake Austin
480-341-7543
Page 953
From: robertfletcher67@aim.com
To: Council District 2 PCC; JIM@JIMWARING.COM; PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: SAVE OUR SONORAN PRESERVE
Date: Sunday, December 16, 2018 6:27:58 AM
As a user of the Apache Wash Trailhead I would like to express my
concern regarding Taylor Morrison’s plan to construct, in a concentrated
manner, 1,400 homes on a 400+ acre parcel of land.
My concerns are the impact this would have on:
1. Traffic issues including the safety of hikers, bicyclists and walkers.
2. The integrity of the Sonoran Preserve Masterplan
3. Water use
4. Wildlife safety
5. Flood control
Please do not allow the integrity of the Sonoran Preserve to deteriorate
by allowing Taylor Morrison’s plan to be implemented.
Best Regards,
Bob
Page 954
From: Lance Morgan
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran preserve rezoning vote
Date: Saturday, December 29, 2018 9:58:15 AM
Good morning, I hope you have had a delightful holiday season. On a recent visit to the
Apache wash hiking area I learned about the proposed Taylor Morrison development. In my
opinion this is a shocking and horrible idea. My main thought is this; where else in phoenix
can you drive down a truly scenic byway? Once you head West off of Cave Creek road, your
taken back to a time of free open space, the way Phoenix used to be. You really get a sense of
a peaceful easy feeling (not trying to plagiarize the eagles, but you know what I mean).
This section of the sonoran preserve is just beautiful, with its tall saguaros, fields of jumping
cholla, vast expansive views, creeks and washes and not to mention the wildlife. I'm afraid if
the development on the south side of the hiking area is allowed to move forward, this area
will lose more that just its visual aspects, but it will leave an indelible mark on the psyche of all
who currently visit this area.
Moreover, I have a sense that we are moving into a slower economic time, not only globally,
but perhaps locally. Rates are rising and less people will be able to afford these potentially
expensive homes. This will not be green economic growth. We've seen this before; a large
home builder plows hundreds of acres of land, to only have it sit vacant for years because of
an economic downturn.
lastly, We need to stand up to these deep pocket home builders who are insistent on building
these cookie cutter subdivisions, that disrupt all in their path. We need to preserve areas like
this and not make the same bad decision as before, not only for us to enjoy, but for our
younger generations.
that being said, I would rather make the right decision and be unpopular with the home
builders, than to make the wrong decision and be unpopular the the voting base and residents
of district 2.
I thank you in advance for making the right decision and voting no for this rezoning proposal.
Kind regards,
Lance Morgan
4230 East Danbury road
Phoenix, AZ 85032
Page 955
From: Lance Morgan
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran preserve
Date: Saturday, December 29, 2018 9:54:52 AM
Good morning, I hope you have had a delightful holiday season. On a recent visit to the
Apache wash hiking area I learned about the proposed Taylor Morrison development. In my
opinion this is a shocking and horrible idea. My main thought is this; where else in phoenix
can you drive down a truly scenic byway? Once you head West off of Cave Creek road, your
taken back to a time of free open space, the way Phoenix used to be. You really get a sense of
a peaceful easy feeling (not trying to plagiarize the eagles, but you know what I mean).
This section of the sonoran preserve is just beautiful, with its tall saguaros, fields of jumping
cholla, vast expansive views, creeks and washes and not to mention the wildlife. I'm afraid if
the development on the south side of the hiking area is allowed to move forward, this area
will lose more that just its visual aspects, but it will leave an indelible mark on the psyche of all
who currently visit this area.
Moreover, I have a sense that we are moving into a slower economic time, not only globally,
but perhaps locally. Rates are rising and less people will be able to afford these potentially
expensive homes. This will not be green economic growth. We've seen this before; a large
home builder plows hundreds of acres of land, to only have it sit vacant for years because of
an economic downturn.
lastly, We need to stand up to these deep pocket home builders who are insistent on building
these cookie cutter subdivisions, that disrupt all in their path. We need to preserve areas like
this and not make the same bad decision as before, not only for us to enjoy, but for our
younger generations.
that being said, I would rather make the right decision and be unpopular with the home
builders, than to make the wrong decision and be unpopular the the voting base and residents
of district 2.
I thank you in advance for making the right decision and voting no for this rezoning proposal.
Kind regards,
Lance Morgan
4230 East Danbury road
Phoenix, AZ 85032
Page 956
From: Annette Cline
To: Kaelee Wilson; council.district2@phoenix.gov
Subject: Housing development on Sonoran Drive
Date: Monday, December 31, 2018 4:52:44 PM
It has come to our attention that the company Taylor Morrison is proposing to build a high
density housing development on Sonoran Drive. We are avid hikers and lifelong Arizona
residents. We treasure the preserves, parks and hiking trails and remain residents of the
Valley in large part for the natural beauty and outdoor activities.We have hiked in this
beautiful natural area. We feel that this plan puts not only the integrity of the Sonoran
Preserve at stake but also the wildlife and quality of life of the neighboring families.
Putting in this development is morally wrong as the The Desert Preserve Master Plan called
for low density housing within the context of Desert character overlay District. We are both
strongly against allowing this proposed development.
Annette and Steve Cline
Page 957
Page 958
Page 959
Page 960
From: Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Rezoning Requst MacEwan 480 Dilemma - PMPC
Date: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:24:36 AM
Attachments: Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480 Dilemna_PMPC.pdf
Village of Desert View and Ms. Kaelee Wilson;
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council (PMPC), a 501-c4 nonprofit
organization charged with the protection of Phoenix Mountains Desert
Preserves writes to you in strong opposition to the proposed MacEwen 480
PUD Application dated December 22, 2018. PMPC has been a determined
voice in support of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and the Sonoran Desert
Preserve since 1970.
PMPC has studied the Proposed Taylor Morrison Planned Unit Development
(PUD) to “up zone” the 488 acre Site south of the Sonoran Desert Drive
between the Cave Creek and Apache Washes and also incorporating the
smaller Mesquite Wash.
As the project that will set a precedent for all future development within the
Sonoran Preserve, PMPC asks that a density much closer to the S-1 and 35,000
square feet per residence be maintained. That ALL of the requirements of the
Edge Guidelines and the Desert Character Overlay District be maintained in
the development of the Master Plan. PMPC also asks that representatives
from our organization be included in the design process as the MacEwen 480
becomes designed.
See attached – Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480 Dilemma
Sincerely,
Patrick McMullen, PhD
PMPC President
PMPC : 12950 N. 7th St. Phoenix, AZ 85022
www.phoenixmountains.org
Page 961
From: Howard Myers
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Z‐62‐18‐2
Date: Saturday, January 19, 2019 9:29:16 PM
Desert View Village Planning Committee members
I am writing you in reference to case Z‐62‐18‐2, The MacEwen 480 master planned
community, in the village of Desert View. It is a request for a major increase in allowed
density on 472.3 acres of land located in the Cave Creek wash flood plain and surrounded by
the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and other undeveloped desert land.
While I do not live in Phoenix, I do live in the Sonoran desert in north Scottsdale and have
worked over 20 years with the city on their Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance
(ESLO), on their McDowell Sonoran Preserve, and on flooding issues with both the city and
the Maricopa County Flood Control District so I have a lot of experience with the desert and
development in it. The city of Scottsdale was way ahead of its time with the ESLO which
protected property with its rules on drainage and maintaining washes and also protected the
fragile desert environment by requiring all property owners to dedicate 25% to 80% of their
property to natural open space as a function of slope. That protection of the desert allows
residents to really connect with their environment and live with it instead of trying to
transform it into something else. As a result water usage is far lower because most of the land
contains natural vegetation which survives without any human interference and irrigation.
Also wildlife is protected and enjoyed by residents, again living in harmony with the
environment. Many of the county and Phoenix residents I talk to, who live in these northern
areas, wish the county and Phoenix would adopt similar regulations that wind up benefitting
both residents and the natural environment. It also makes development sustainable, even in
drought conditions like we are facing now.
So that brings us to this proposed development which is almost the exact opposite of this
philosophy. It jams so many houses into the desert that the natural environment disappears,
and then to make it worse they intend to add non native vegetation that requires a lot of water.
This development also has a major wash going through the middle of it and borders others
including the Cave Creek wash which carries a lot of water from a huge drainage to the north.
All the non-pervious surfaces will cause far more runoff from this property which will have to
be controlled. In addition, due to the density, there is no room for water to flow around the
structures which would mitigate some of the flooding issues. So drainage and flood control
will become issues with it. The same is true for wildlife. This area should have a lot of wildlife
because of the washes which are major corridors, and the Phoenix Preserve, but there is no
room for them to move though this development. The open space required in the ESLO
provides these corridors and the natural vegetation wildlife need. Scottsdale’s General Plan
also calls for the lowest possible density adjacent to the McDowell Sonoran Preserve to
maintain wildlife corridors and minimize the impact of development on the Preserve.
This development is an island in the desert, isolated by washes with only one possible access,
the Desert Sonoran Drive which will have to carry ALL of the traffic from this development.
The Desert Sonoran Drive was supposed to be a scenic drive through the desert, now it will be
a major conduit for all these homes. Also, all those cars will have to go to either Cave Creek
Road, or through the neighborhoods to the west, there are no other options. The Desert
Sonoran Drive will also have to carry all the water and waste water infrastructure, and none of
Page 962
that is close, increasing the city’s expenses in servicing this development. A single point of
entry for over 1400 homes is also a huge problem. A secondary access was shown, but it also
intersects with the Desert Sonoran Drive and really comes into the development at about the
same place as the main one so any disruption in that area, or past it, isolates all the other
homes.
This is just another case of a developer trying to jam as many houses as they can on to a
property without any consideration of the impact on the environment, other residents, and the
city. A reasonable number of homes, 500 or less, would allow it to be developed in a more
responsible manner, would allow it to be in harmony with the environment instead of in
opposition to it, and would have a less negative impact on all the surrounding uses, including
the Phoenix Preserve.
I hope you will consider the impact of what is proposed and as a minimum scale it back to
something reasonable. The developer will still make plenty of money, the eventual inhabitants
of this development will enjoy their homes much more, and everyone else, who lives near it or
travels through it, will be better off.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Howard Myers
President of Protect Our Preserve, president of the Carriage Trails HOA, and participant in
many city boards, commissions, and citizen committees over the past 23 years including
updates to the ESLO and General Plan.
--
Howard Myers
Home:
Addr: 6631 E. Horned Owl Trail
Scottsdale, AZ 85266-8511
Phone: 480-473-0109 (home)
480-262-3502 (Cell)
E-mail: howard.myers@cox.net
If you have any other e-mail or phone numbers for me, please use the Home
information above instead.
None of the previous work e-mail or work phone numbers are valid anymore
Page 963
From: daniel.centilli
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: jim@jimwaring.con; northvalleymultisport@googlegroups.com
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve, proposed Development
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 8:15:51 PM
Attachments: Screenshot_2019-02-19-18-52-09.png
Dear Neighbors and Teammates,
My name is Daniel Centilli. I am an airline pilot for Southwest Airlines, and a homeowner in
Desert Ridge. My wife is an MBA and a manager at Vanguard. We are well compensated and
politically active.
When I recently learned that there was a proposal to allow 1400 homes to be developed in the
parcel of land adjacent to the Apache Wash Trailhead at the Phoenix Sonoran Desert Preserve,
I was disgusted and angry. This is one of the last unspoiled open spaces of desert in the North
Valley. It is an area that many of my friends and neighbors use for recreation. We enjoy the
trails and bike lanes that are located along Sonoran Desert Parkway/Dove Valley. This
development will not only spoil some of the last, most beautiful desert in the north valley, but
will also lead to a dangerous increase in motor vehicle traffic along Sonoran Desert Parkway.
This segment of road is the most important uninterrupted stretch of bike infrastructure in the
north valley. It allows cyclists to connect safely from Cave Creek Road to Norterra and
Anthem. It one of the most utilized segments of bike lane infrasructure in Phoenix. I strongly
encourage you to view Strava's Heatmap, to view the evidence of this:
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#11.40/-112.05156/33.75318/hot/ride
This is a tool that allows you to see the combined activities of thousands of users of the fitness
application, Strava. Strava has been used in civil planning applications in regards to
determining where bicycling lanes are needed, and more importantly, in THIS case, where
cyclists feel SAFE riding. We, as cyclists, currently feel safe riding along Sonoran Desert
Parkway. .I am a member of North Valley Multisport, a triathlon club operating out of the
Anthem, Tramanto, Desert Ridge, and Cave Creek areas. In fact, North Valley Multisport is
actually the Adopt a Road sponsor of a significant stretch of Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert
Parkway.
One of the primary reasons I purchased an existing home in Desert Ridge was its proximity to
the Sonoran Desert Preserve. This is different than actually building adjacent to and disturbing
the preserve itself, as I believe that this development will do. Once this is done, it can NEVER
be undone.
I strongly oppose this development. Please consider the current users and future users of the
Sonoran Desert Preserve. This is a stunningly beautiful area that should be protected for future
generations.
I have attached several photos of this area, so that you can see for yourself the beauty of this
parcel of land. It should be preserved.
I intend to apply both social and financial resources to opposing this development, and any
publically elected offical that supports it.
Page 964
Sincerly,
Daniel Centilli
269 267 6630
Daniel.centilli@gmail.com
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
Page 965
From: Karyn Lupfer
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Proposed Taylor Morrison Housing Development
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 6:33:31 AM
I just heard through my hiking group that there is a possibility for yet another housing
development to be built on desert land, and as a frequent user of the Sonoran Preserve up
there, I am so disappointed with this. The sonoran preserve is a beautiful area, and should be
left alone. There is already a development going in on the west side of the preserve. Adding
another housing development will be detrimental to the area and those who enjoy it. Part of
the draw of the area off of the apache wash trailhead is that you feel like you've escaped the
city life, without having to drive for hours. Not only will the noise during construction be an
issue but once there are people living there there will be more traffic in the area, making the
dangers for bikers along Sonoran desert drive higher. More traffic means extending the awful
air quality of Phoenix up to this area too, which we prefer this area to locations within the city
because the air quality is better. And then there will be the impact on the wildlife. The
preserve is home to many, many creatures. Bulldozing the desert homes of these animals to
build homes will displace them. Where will they go? How many will have to be killed because
they start eating people's pets and suddenly this brand new neighborhood has a "coyote
problem"? Please, please, do not let this development happen. If someone wants to buy a
home at the edge of the desert, there are already plenty of existing homes by preserves. Please,
leave some nature to nature.
Page 966
From: Karen Chen
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Rezoning
Date: Friday, February 22, 2019 3:52:40 PM
Please do not rezone allowing 1400 homes to be built right next to the Sonoran Desert Perserve.
Respectfully,
Karen Chen
Page 967
From: Mike Devito
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Taylor Morison Homes
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 7:41:57 PM
Hello,
I live in by the Sonoran Desert Preserve and I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert
Preserve.
Thank you,
Mike De Vito
Page 968
From: Eric Idalski
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 5:33:55 PM
To whom it may concern,
I recently found out the plans to try to rezone an area adjacent to the Sonoran Desert Preserve. I wanted to email
you and advise I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
Regards,
Eric Idalski
32706 N 18th Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Sent from my iPhone
Page 969
From: Caitlin Leja
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: No houses
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 8:34:50 AM
I am a resident next to the Sonoran preserve. I am NOT in favor of 1400 houses being built next to the
preserve!!!! It will add traffic, congestion and take away from the beauty of the desert!
Caitlin Leja, M.S, CCC-SLP
Page 970
From: Kristi Terrio
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Apache trailhead, 1400 new houses
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 7:26:37 AM
Greetings,
I’m a resident of Carefree Crossings in Phoenix, 85085, and my backyard backs up to Dove Valley Rd. My family
and I utilize the Apache Wash Trailhead all year long. We are concerned over a builder-request to construct 1400
new houses directly to the East of the trailhead. This will cause issues to the already car-congested area, and will
ruin a beautiful outdoor destination for residents in North Phoenix (Sonoran Foothills, Tramonto, Desert Hills,
Anthem, Desert Ridge), Cave Creek, and North Scottsdale/Carefree.
Please contact me if you’d like to discuss this poor solution to urban growth. Please deny the builders request.
Sincerely,
Kristi Swift
Cell: 602-628-8838
Sent from my iPad
Page 971
From: Fran W
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: 1400 homes next to Sonoran Preserve
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 8:48:50 AM
We do not want to see 1400 homes next to the Sonoran Preserve
A removal of Desert Overlay zoning would completely undermine the vision and long term
plan created in the early 1990's for this area.
We live in Terravita and find Desert Overlay to distinguish our area from others to great,
desirable preference and benefit.
Ben and Fran Wylie
Page 972
From: Lincoln Burke
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Desired Rezoning of Sonoran Desert Preserve
Date: Sunday, February 24, 2019 8:54:20 PM
To Whom it May Concern
I am writing as a concerned resident of North Phoenix and active user of the Sonoran Desert Preserve. It has come
to my attention that Taylor Morrison owns 500 acres south of Sonoran Desert Parkway adjacent to the the Sonoran
Desert Preserve. It is my understanding that they are petitioning the City of Phoenix to have the area rezoned to
allow up to 1400+ homes built on the site. I want to strongly oppose this rezoning application.
While I would love for the entire area south of Sonoran Desert Drive to remain open desert land I do understand that
there will eventually be development in this area. My hope at this point is that I can assist in restricting the
development to only what is actually sustainable. I see multiple levels of problems with rezoning this area for
higher density. The first is water resources, there is no doubt that we are already stressing the existing water in the
area. The second, and far more important to me, is the strain on the school district. My daughters currently attend
Sonoran Foothills School. It has only been open for three years and is already overcrowded and has lost the pre-
school program that my girls both benefited from. Already there is a development by Taylor Morrison south of
SDD and just recently a plot of land due north of Sonoran Foothills School was purchased by Lennar. I am unaware
of the current zoning of that plot of land but be assured I will oppose any rezoning attempt by the developer there for
higher density as well.
I appreciate your time and consideration in this matter. Please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Lincoln Burke
Sent from my iPad
Sent from my iPad
Page 973
From: Christy Hart
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: I oppose the proposed housing development near Apache wash trailhead
Date: Monday, February 25, 2019 10:23:51 AM
I don't want to see 1400 home right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
As a mountain biker and hiker, I look forward to the pristine views around when I
am enjoying the Preserve. The enormous amount of homes would add hazard to
cyclists and hikers with the increased traffic.
Christy Hart
Executive Consultant for Rodan + Fields
Use the Solution Tool to learn what the Doctors recommend for you!
christyrhart.myrandf.com
602-819-2307
Page 974
From: Karen Severance
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, February 28, 2019 8:59:07 PM
Dear Ms. Wilson,
Please don’t change the zoning in the Sonoran Preserve. Our ecosystem is delicately balanced, and the denser the
zoning, the more damage will be done. Our desert wildlife and flora have already been negatively impacted, not to
mention an infrastructure already stressed beyond its capacity.
Thank you for considering the future of our beautiful preserve.
Karen Severance
Page 975
TO: Phoenix City Council
& Desert View Village Planning Committee
FROM: Matthew Salenger, Head Collaborative Facilitator
Living Building Challenge Sonoran Collaborative
http://collaboratives.living-future.org/sonoran-collaborative/
DATE / TIME: 3/2/2019 3:50 PM
CC: file, AIA Arizona
SENT VIA: email
RE: Desert Preservation vs Development
Dear City Council Members & Desert View VPC-
Let me introduce our group: We are one of over 250 international collaboratives attempting to
provide greater sustainability in our communities through education and assistance with the
Living Building Challenge (LBC). The LBC is a project certification program, much like Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), though far more wholistic and comprehensive. The
Sonoran Collaborative, of which I am the current Chair, is the LBC collaborative for our region.
I am writing you today in an effort to save more of our greatest economic asset: The natural
Sonoran Desert. It has been well documented our desert is the single largest pull for tourism. It is
also cited as a major draw by corporations moving to our region, as our climate and close-
proximity to preserves provides their employees with a high quality of life. Therefore, I wish to
request that you not grant a zoning change for a property surrounded by preserves, state and
county land. I am speaking specifically about a property of 473 acres shown on the attached map.
It has come to our attention a developer hopes to rezone this property in order to increase the
density allowed. Currently 400-500 homes are allowed, but the zoning sought would allow 1400+
homes. Either density would greatly damage the surrounding preserve through souring the view,
environmental damage through construction, and future home owners forging their own paths
through the preserve. The larger the density, the more damage will occur.
The LBC has 20 “imperatives” required to achieve full certification. The first imperative states:
Projects may only be built on greyfields or brownfields: previously developed sites that are not classified
as on or adjacent to any… sensitive ecological habitat. While it may not be the desire for these
developers to gain LBC certification, this imperative speaks to the universal truth that we should
not build on precious untouched native habitat. Why? Because doing so damages our own
economic, mental, and bodily health as well as that of fragile ecosystems around us.
The property in question is in a location that should never be developed. One look at the map
of its location shows this to be quite obvious. Our group would recommend the following:
1. The City of Phoenix purchase the land from the developer and designate it as part of
the adjacent preserve.
2. Barring #1, the City work with the State to purchase the land and designate it as part
of the adjacent preserve.
3. Barring #1 or #2, the City work (possibly with the State) to provide a land swap,
where the property in question becomes part of the preserve; and the developer
obtains an equally valuable piece of land adjacent to other existing development to
allow that development can be contiguous and the preserve can also be contiguous.
This will greatly reduce the impact development.
We hope you will consider working to avoid any development at the property in question.
Please save this preserve area.
Page 976
Lastly, I would like to mention these types of “leap-frog” developments are very damaging
and unsustainable, not only to the environment, but also to city coffers. They bring huge
infrastructure costs that will only increase over time, bringing financial hardship to the City of
Phoenix and the State. We would advocate for all future development to be limited within areas
without any un-touched land in order to help assure our continued ability to thrive as a metropolis.
In order to not over-burden our future, we need real leadership to recognize when decisions we
make now damage our economies in the future.
For more information on LBC: https://living-future.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Living-
Building-Challenge-3.0-Standard.pdf
For more information on our regional collaborative: http://collaboratives.living-
future.org/sonoran-collaborative/
Thank you for your consideration.
Matthew Salenger, AIA, coLAB studio, llc
Co-LBCSC Facilitators and additional signees: Sonja Bochart, IIDA, LEED AP BD&C, WELL
AP, Shepley Bulfinch; Premnath Sundharam, Global Sustainability Leader, DLR Group; Jeff
Stanton, Smith Group; Ashley Mulhall, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, WELL AP, Orcutt Winslow
Page 977
From: Mike L
To: Council District 2 PCC; PDD Desert View VPC; saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Housing Density Change
Date: Sunday, March 3, 2019 6:57:12 PM
Hello,
As a frequent mountain biker / hiker at Apache Wash trailhead I’ve followed with mixed
interest and dismay the encroachment of subdivisions on the surrounding areas.
Today I learned that Taylor Morrison is proposing to increase the density beyond that allowed
in the 1998 Master Plan.
Your feedback is welcomed as I educate myself with an eye to resisting this development and
its unwelcome impacts.
Thank you,
Mike Looney
--
Mike
Page 978
From: ALLENFAMTX
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve S-1 Zoning
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 4:17:09 PM
Dear Planning Committee,
We are homeowners in the Stonebridge at Dynamite Mountain Ranch subdivision. Please accept this email
as notice that I do not approve or support modification of the S-1 Zoning at the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
The planners got it right the first time and I support maintain S-1 Zoning. No hardship = No change!
Allowing 1400 homes to be built in this area will absolutely violate the beauty of the area, the already
compromised eco-system of our desert, and the original intent of city planners.
Please save our Preserve!!!!
Kristi & Lawrence Allen
1929 W Duane Ln, Phoenix, Az 85085
mobile: 281-658-8654
Page 979
From: Mary Caton
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Apache Wash Trailhead - Vote NO on 1400 homes
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 1:44:40 PM
Hello
I spend a lot of time hiking and biking in Apache Wash recreational area and think it is a bad
idea to change the zoning to allow for more density of homes. This area does not need 1400
homes near the trail head as opposed to the current 500 homes zoning. I do not support the
request from Taylor Homes to increase from 500 homes to 1400 homes. Please help protect
our natural areas from too much development and vote no to the request to rezone.
Thank you
Mary Caton
Page 980
From: flaxgulch@aol.com
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Opinion from local resident for your consideration
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 2:28:31 PM
As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
LaVonne Lindall\
6701 East Tanya Road
Cave Creek, AZ 85331
Page 981
From: Gail Martinelli
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonora Preserve
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 4:39:15 PM
As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran
Desert Preserve. There is to much building happening in our area. Please
keep the original S-1 zoning plan which only allowed low-density housing at
the MacEwan 480 zoning proposal.
Thank you,
Gail Martinelli
Page 982
From: righins mtb
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: NO to 1400 homes next to Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 9:37:07 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen
we have a lot of examples of how bad urban planning can destroy the environment and the
quality of life . We do not need to keep making the same mistake over and over. Bringing
1400 high-density homes to be close to the Sonoran Preserve will create caos in a peaceful
area, will affect the life of several animals, will destroy the beauty of the desert and will
mislead people that buy the homes.
There was a reason for having a "Sonoran Preserve Master Plan" and there is a reason for
allowing only low density development. Lets stick to the plan!
Home developers are only concerned with the money they make. The less infrastructure they
create the better. Thus high density is their choice. The problem is that those that build the
development do not stay there to leave in the caos they create.
Regards
Ricardo
Page 983
From: Steve Swerid
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Zoning
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 6:33:20 AM
Hi Jim,
Again, please note
"As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
Please keep the original S-1 zoning plan which only allowed low-density housing at the
MacEwan 480 zoning proposal."
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
Page 984
From: Steve Swerid
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Zoning
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 6:32:07 AM
Good morning,
As a resident in Sonoran Foothills I would like to express my opinion AGAINST the high density zoning initiative.
We purchased our home in a beautiful neighbourhood with large homes and access to nature and open spaces. I
understand the need to progress however, changing from low density to high density is an ongoing trend that is
taking away from the beauty of the desert and quite frankly is reducing the value of our homes.
I don’t want to live beside apartments complexes and gas stations.
The city overbuilt and realized a crash not a decade ago and it seems like we are chasing this same animal again.
We need parks, open spaces, high end grocery stores and restaurants and not the continuous box stores and mini
strip malls offering the same old options of fast food, nail shops and pet stores.
We purchased our home because of the beautiful and discriminating neighbourhoods, pathway systems, green
spaces, privacy and security.
Please DO NOT rezone our area to high density.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
Page 985
From: Michelle Wedsworth
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Apache Wash Trailhead - Vote NO on 1400 homes
Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 2:56:57 PM
Hello
My family and I are active users of the Apache Wash and are not supportive of the
Taylor Morrison request to place 1400 homes adjacent the trail head. The land is
zoned for 500 homes for a reason and we do not support it going from 500 to 1400.
Please help protect the park and those who use it and vote no to the request to
rezone.
Thank you for your consideration. Michelle Wedsworth
Page 986
From: Kathy Allison
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: ‘Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix’
Date: Friday, March 8, 2019 6:45:59 PM
‘Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix’
Please don’t develop this land - it is needed to reserve our desert. Not to mention the noise
and pollution.
Concerned citizen
Page 987
From: Deborah Moore
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: debtoon1@yahoo.com
Subject: Sonoran desert parkway
Date: Saturday, March 9, 2019 10:27:35 AM
I am a concerned citizen who lives near the land set aside for everyone to enjoy. If a developer builds 1,400 homes
that road will be a nightmare and the beauty will be ruined. Please stop the rezoning for development . Think of
future generations who will not know the beauty we are enjoying now .
Sincerely,
Deborah Moore
4518 East Bajada Rd
Cave Creek 85331
Sent from my iPhone
Page 988
From: nicoletti@cox.net
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: To the Desert View Planning Committee
Date: Saturday, March 9, 2019 4:45:06 PM
Importance: High
Hello
I’m a frequent Apache Wash hiker and it’s come to my attention that a home developer – Taylor
Morrison, is proposing to build 1400 homes on private land just east of the Apache Wash Trailhead.
This will require a rezoning of low-density development (500 homes) to a high density development
(1400 homes.) The Sonoran Preserve Masterplan (February 17, 1998) specifically states that
neighboring development is to be low-density.
I have many concerns about how this development will negatively impact the Preserve through a
high volume of traffic, noise, water usage, wildlife interruptions, flood control and many other
impacts.
I hope you will consider not approving the rezoning request so that the Preserve will be enjoyed as it
is meant to be.
Thank you.
Susan Nicoletti
480.419.9373
Scottsdale, 85266
nicoletti@cox.net
Page 989
From: SUZANNE RAY
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix
Date: Sunday, March 10, 2019 1:59:54 PM
Dear Ms. Wilson,
I am writing in response to the MacEwan 480/Taylor Morrison application (Cases Z-62-18-2; Z-
TA-5-18-2; and Z-75-18-2). As a resident of the Sonoran Foothills community, my quality of life
will be significantly impacted by rezoning this area to build 1400 homes with no buffer or
significant set-backs from the road or the Preserve. I am advocating to maintain S-1 low
density residential zoning. The integrity of the Sonoran Preserve is at stake as the Sonoran
Preserve Masterplan specifically notes a neighboring development is to be low density.
Increasing density creates negative impacts: this parcel of land has high value with regard to
habitat and water resources; and with regard to recreation, will detract from the user
experience. Increasing density also will increase the already present daily traffic congestion.
As I observed with the construction of Sonoran Gate, another Taylor Morrison community
along Sonoran Desert Drive/Dove Valley Road, the litter and garbage from construction trucks
and workers was abominable. As an endurance athlete who uses Sonoran Desert Drive/Dove
Valley Road and the Preserve daily, I fear for my safety with the dramatic increase in traffic
that will be the result of rezoning this area to allow for all this construction.
I appreciate your consideration in this matter and hope you will conclude the necessity to
maintain S-1 low density residential zoning of this precious area.
Sincerely,
Suzanne J. Ray
suzanne_squires@msn.com
1709 West Burnside Trail, Phoenix, Arizona, 85085
480-332-2943
Page 990
From: Ralph Ray
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, March 14, 2019 2:32:28 PM
I am writing in response to the MacEwan 480/Taylor Morrison application to rezone the area on the
south side of Sonoran Desert road and build over 1400 homes in this area. I, like so many of my
neighbors, moved to the Sonoran Foothills community to be near this beautiful desert, and to be
able to cycle in a safe manner without cars crossing over the bike lane to turn onto or from Sonoran
Desert or Dove Valley roads. Adding a housing community of that size, and all of the cars and traffic
congestion that would come with it will ruin this area. The traffic during rush hour now is already
bad, with cars backed up on Sonoran Desert trying to turn onto Cave Creek in the morning, and
sometimes all the way back to Jomax in the afternoon, waiting to turn from Cave Creek onto
Sonoran Desert. The original zoning plan for this area to be low density was and is still the correct
plan for this area. I am not asking for no growth, just to keep the zoning as is, and not destroy this
rare, beautiful Preserve that so many people enjoy every day.
I appreciate your consideration in this very important matter.
Ralph Ray
1709 W Burnside Trl
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Page 991
From: jean brady
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Friday, March 22, 2019 11:13:27 AM
I personally drive the beautiful Sonoran Desert Drive several times a week on the way to my
sister's apartment. The zone changing notification signs are so ridiculously placed, that it is
virtually impossible to see what they say from the road. Even if you pulled over, which is no
easy feat, you cannot read them from the road; you need to walk through the terrain to read
what they say. Purposeful, most definitely. Not only are they quite a distance from the road,
they are also turned facing Cave Creek Road, rather than Sonoran Desert Drive. Definitely
purposeful. I have never seen these signs posted in such a way, have you? I've seen
thousands of them, never posted so strategically placed. Does no one check the placement of
these signs, to be sure they are actually posted and the manner in which they are placed?
1400 homes??? Seriously?? Who is approving this? Where will the more than 2000 cars go?
Another zoning change? Unbelievable!
Jean Brady
5338 E Milton Drive
Cave Creek AZ 85331
Page 992
From: Mary Jo Hardy
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: MacEwan480 /Taylor Morrison rezoning request
Date: Saturday, March 23, 2019 3:42:13 PM
Representatives,
My husband and I have just completed a wonderful bike ride in the Sonoran Reserve. Three days ago, we took a
beautiful hike there with friends. We were very surprised and saddened to find out that there is a possibility that this
jewel in northern Phoenix is in danger of being changed forever.
The current zoning and Master Plan has allowed moderate development while protecting the desert environment.
This has created a wonderful area for the enjoyment of thousands of residents and visitors.
Please do not put corporate profits ahead of the natural beauty and quality of life that the Sonoran Preserve provides
to all citizens!
The Preserve was created after careful consideration and planning. Do not change that now!
Thank you.
Mary Jo Hardy
Okemos, MI
(Frequent visitor to the Phoenix area!)
Sent from my iPhone
Page 993
From: Kelly Leone
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Taylor Morrison Rezoning request
Date: Sunday, March 24, 2019 11:19:05 AM
Dear Councilman Waring, Village Members, and Miss Wilson,
I plead with you to deny the MacEwan 480/ Taylor Morissison request for rezoning of property on the Sonoran
Parkway in North Phoenix. When the Preserve was created, zoning was thoughtfully and carefully designated for
nature and neighborhoods.
Approval of 947 extra homes will have an affect of more than just number of homes built. Included in reasons to
reconsider are:
1. Excessive amounts of traffic on Cave Creek Rd, 101 loop, I17, and Tatum Blvd.
2. Lack of amenities to support homes and families residing in them (including grocery stores and medical
facilities).
3. Lack of schools, will new schools and or district be created?
4. Sonoran Parkway will not be as biker/pedestrian friendly. Increased dangers for both.
5. Will change the entire landscape of the Preserve. When Phoenix advertises out of state I imagine they show our
natural beauty and not rows and rows of cookie cutter homes.
6. The impact of additional pollution from the physical building of extra homes along with the families residing in
them.
7. Affect on the natural washes.
8. Affect on the indigenous wildlife and plants.
9. Does Phoenix and Taylor Morrison want to look like liars, cheaters and shady operators by going against
previously planned and approved designations?
As a resident, home owner, tax payer and lover of Arizona I again ask that you deny the MacEwan/Taylor Morrison
request to rezone on Sonoran Parkway and maintain S1 and Desert Overlay Zoning.
Sincerely,
Kelly Leone
Sent from my iPad
Page 994
From: dave@cavena.net
To: Council District 2 PCC
Cc: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 9:42:51 PM
Sir:
We live in Tramonto. I hike in North Hills almost every weekend, and 3-4 evenings/week on my way
home from work in Tempe. This evening I finished after dark, using my headlamp the last mile or
two. I drive to-from work via Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert highway. The desert surrounding the hills
and their great trails are quiet, calming, nice. Phoenix has done amazing things with these trails –
don’t despoil them with yet more homes we don’t need here.
I have seen the signs up to change the zoning, creating yet another development in the middle of
this spectacular desert. We don’t need this. We locals don’t WANT it. No reason exists from
standpoints of density, space, view - it’s flat and no one will have any sort of view from their home to
write home about – yet the view from both South Hills and North Hills, as well as from the scenic
drive that is the Sonoran Desert Highway / Dove Valley Road, will be forever stained by this
repetition of the development a couple of miles west of this new proposal. Another rectangle of
walks, houses, streets plopped down in the midst of a beautiful desert landscape.
It’s just another scar on the land, another need for water and sewage in a pristine area.
The Preserve wasn’t created, nor the trails created and maintained, to just look at yet another
housing development. It was created to give us all a break from housing developments, and
remembrance of what the Valley is really about.
Please vote against this, and for leaving the desert as it is in and around the Preserve.
Regards,
Dave Cavena
dave@cavena.net
626-818-0313 (m)
626-812-0930 (o)
Page 995
From: johannes marais
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: johannam0916@gmail.com; nukemanmaximus@gmail.com; Bettina Marais
Subject: Apache wash/Taylor Morrison
Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 10:53:49 AM
Dear Kaelee and Colleagues: My family and I have been using the Apache wash area for hiking and mountain
biking since 2007 (prior to area being developed for recreation). We strongly feel that Taylor Morrison’s proposed
development of 1,400 high density homes in the area of the Apache wash trail will be greatly detrimental to the
ecosystem and the public who loves to use the fabulous recreational infrastructure the city of Phoenix has put in
place there. This development will add at least 1,400 cars to the SONORAN desert drive and cave creek rd that is
already heavily congested with traffic. Thanks in advance for your consideration
JJ Marais
Mobile 602-315-6079
Page 996
From: Lindsey Tillman
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Preserve My Home - Maintain S-1 Zoning
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 5:47:39 AM
Hi,
My name is Lindsey Tillman. I have lived in North Phoenix since I was 5. A lot has changed since
1992. I have wonderful memories growing up in Desert Hills. I remember running off and playing in
the desert washes, riding my horse on secluded desert trails, and going on desert walks with my
parents and little sister. I remember loving when it rained because our wash would flood and we
couldn’t go to school. I remember riding my horse to my elementary school. When deciding to raise
my own family, I wanted a similar childhood for my children, and this is why we choose to live in
North Phoenix.
We frequent the Apache Wash Trailhead and live off of Dove Valley road. We are always amazed at
the beauty that is still there despite watching the desert develop around us. I am writing this email
to ask you to NOT allow this desert to be overtaken with growth. Please preserve the quality that
makes North Phoenix a desirable and unique place to live. The vast desert views and tower saguaros
are not something someone can get in Chandler or Gilbert and why people love this area.
Please MAINTAIN S-1 ZONING. I do not want to see 1400 homes built on the Sonoran Desert
Preserve.
Thank you for preserving my home.
Lindsey Tillman
623-694-4088
lindseybtillman@gmail.com
Page 997
From: Diana Duran
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: MacEwen 480 Taylor Morrison"s rezoning request
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2019 12:02:44 PM
Hello,
I am writing to you as a homeowner that lives in the Sonoran Foothills HOA off of Sonoran
Desert Drive. I have read the 117 page Planned Unit Development Narrative and I have a
major concern about adding an additional 940 homes.
I am not opposed to the S1 Zoning which is the original zoning. What I am opposed to is
changing the Desert Overlay Zoning and S1 Zoning. Adding 1,420 homes will add an
additional 2,840 cars to Sonoran Desert Drive which happens to be a two lane scenic road.
That is a lot of cars on a scenic drive.
Sonoran Desert Drive ends at N Valley Parkway and Cave Creek Road. The additional 940
homeowners (and I'm sure they will be multiple car owners) will be driving to N Valley
Parkway or Cave Creek Rd for shopping and schooling. N Valley Parkway is already
crowded with the build-out of Sonoran Gate and then there will be additional homes on Dove
Valley Rd once Lennar Homes builds out. It is difficult to turn left or right onto Dove Valley
Rd these days.
If you look at page 115 of their proposal you can see they are surrounded by Apache Wash
and Cave Creek Wash as well as having Mesquite Tank Wash roll right through this proposed
subdivision. I can't see additional access roads being built. It seems the only access roads to
this subdivision is Sonoran Desert Drive. I ride my bicycle on this drive every weekend.
Please keep the original zoning and only allow 480 homes to be built and keep the Desert
Overlay designation.
Kind Regards,
Diana Duran, CMA, MBA
Page 998
Page 999
Page 1000
Page 1001
Page 1002
Page 1003
Page 1004
Page 1005
From: Jill Hoffman
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Re-zoning Taylor Morrison Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Saturday, March 30, 2019 6:42:57 PM
Hello,
My name is Jill Hoffman and I am a resident of Sonoran Foothills. I would love to attend the planning
meeting on Tuesday evening, but my son has a playoff baseball game that night and my husband is
currently going through cancer treatment at Mayo, so he is unable to take him or attend the meeting. We are
trying to keep the kids lives as close to normal as possible, which means missing the re-zoning meeting.
I am very concerned about the plans Taylor Morrison has to change the current zoning for their project on
Sonoran Desert Drive. I support a change in zoning when it supports the surrounding community, but their
plans do not enhance our community in any way, it only adds 1400 new homes to an area not zoned or
designed to handle that. It goes against everything that is written on the Desert View Village Planning
Community website. The site talks about "higher densities along the Loop 101 freeway”, and about the
"natural washes that have biking, walking, equestrian and multi use trails that provide an abundance of
opportunities for recreation in the LOWER density areas". By approving Taylor Morrisons’ request to
change the density zoning, you are going against everything listed on the website and what the current
residents love about our village. To allow Taylor Morrison to also change the Desert Character Overylay,
also changes what the plan for the village is. Why should they be exempt from the plan? It’s one thing when
it’s in the higher density area, but this is adjacent to the Desert Preserve. Does that mean if they are
approved for the character overlay change, I can have grass and queen palms in my front yard? There was a
plan for a reason, so builders wouldn’t change the landscape of the beautiful desert we have here in north
Phoenix.
For the last 8 weeks, we have driven to Mayo on eastbound Sonoran Desert Drive 5 days a week. It is a
gorgeous road, but very crowded, and full of people with road rage in the morning. I drive 60 mph and have
been flipped off more times than I can count, (the speed limit is 45). It is so overcrowded, I can not imagine
how that road can handle more traffic the way the road was planned. The road would clearly need to be
widened, which would be against what it was meant to be, also at whose cost? The city? I sure hope not! I
don’t want the high density neighborhood, and now I’ll probably get to help pay for their access.
Another concern is that Sonoran Foothills School is already planning on building 4 new classrooms because
our school is past capacity in just it's 4th year. That neighborhood will also be assigned to a high school that
no one wants to go to, so they can open enroll elsewhere like we all do. I’m sure they would love to drive
their kids all the way to BGHS for all their activities so that we can help BGHS's test scores. That is one of
the biggest issues in holding us back from being a true community, we all split to 3 different high schools…
Boulder Creek, O’Connor and Pinnacle.
The 303 exit was not planned very well either, as that lane backs up to Dixileta by 4:30 every day. It’s un-
nerving to see the scared face in your rearview mirror when a driver doesn’t expect to stop on the freeway
going 70mph. If you continue to approve these zoning changes, it will take away our safety and from the
amazing village that was planned. Stick to the plan and keep our desert village great!
I sincerely hope you will consider my concerns. I love our north Phoenix neighborhood and hate to see it
destroyed by greedy builders. I have no issue with new homes, but it needs to fit within the current plan and
the builder needs to provide the infrastructure to support the growth.
Jill Hoffman
Page 1006
From: azmitchlove
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Desert Drive needs to remain as is
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2019 4:29:23 PM
Sonoran Desert Drive Zoning needs to remain as is. This is the most beautiful area in North
Phoenix and the Drive is such an amazing place to ride a bike or hike off of. Please please do
not give in to developers again.
470 homes is too much as is. 1,400 homes will ruin our community, natural resources and the
pristine desert we all enjoy.
Water is a major factor to consider. AZ is running out. I see all the wells Phoenix is digging
around town already. Another 1400 homes right here is a huge strain. We need to moderate
growth for a bit.
Traffic is another major issue. Taylor Morrison’s study is sided and misleading. Cave Creek
road has already seen an insane increase in traffic and accidents. Adding these homes will
make the roads a nightmare.
The signage is misleading and has been moved. How long have the signs been 100 yards or
more off of the road? I drove down Sonoran Desert Drive on Saturday to go hiking and saw
the signs are now closer to the road. How many people do not know about the meeting or the
rezoning request because they were not going to go offroading to read the signs...that is if they
even saw them from the road. Poor gamesmanship on the builder. They should not get away
with these misleading tactics.
Our community will be left with the consequences once Taylor Morrison and their competitors
move on. Please do not let them take advantage of the area and the city.
Thanks
Mitch Love
602-430-5152
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Page 1007
From: Maureen Love
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2019 4:11:04 PM
Sonoran Desert Drive Zoning needs to remain.
470 homes is too much, 1,400 homes will ruin our community and natural resources.
Water is a major factor to consider. AZ is running out.
Traffic is another major issue. Taylor Morrison’s study is sided and misleading.
The signage is misleading and has been moved.
Our community will be left with the consequences once Taylor Morrison and their competitors move on.
~Maureen Love.
Page 1008
From: Allen Frankel
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 4:40:26 PM
I am opposed to the development at the Sonoran Preserve.
Sent from my iPhone
Page 1009
From: Jeff Franklin
To: Council District 2 PCC; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Save our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 5:04:17 PM
Dear Councilman Jim Waring and Desertview VPC Committee:
My name is Jeff Franklin, I live in 85387 zip code. I support Save Our Sonoran Preserve and I
believe in the responsible and sustainable development of the desert in Arizona. This means
maintaining existing zoning of the preserve. Please vote no on the MacEwan 480 rezoning
request put forward by Taylor Morrison. This rezoning negatively impacts our preserve and
will set precedent for future home builders to put in higher density housing around the
preserve.
The case numbers are as follows: Z-62-18-2; Z-TA-5-18-2; and Z-75-18-2.
Thank you, and PLEASE vote NO!
Jeff Franklin
Page 1010
From: Micki
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Rezoning cases Z-62-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-75-18-2
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 2:29:46 PM
Dear Committee Members,
I am opposed to this request to rezone the area described as the MacEwan 480 in the above case
numbers. I own a home in Sonoran Foothills a development to the west of this proposed community.
Traffic is already a problem along Sonoran Desert Drive and adding 1420 homes can only make it
worse. Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a scenic corridor, not a primary route into and out of a
project with this kind of density. The developers are also trying to remove the Desert Character
Overlay on this property which was originally developed to protect the character of the Sonoran
Desert with density restrictions and building codes. Please honor the original zoning of 1 home per
acre and retain the Desert Character Overlay by not approving this request.
Sincerely,
Michelle Kelley
480-330-1799
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Page 1011
From: Ms Pat De Stefano
To: council.district.2@phoenix.agov; jim@jimwaring.com; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Rezoning on Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 1:08:47 PM
I am writing to strongly urge all NOT to rezone the open area on Sonoran Desert Dr. I am a
frequent hiker at Apache Wash, and rezoning and building houses in that area is totally
unnecessary, would ruin the landscape, increase traffic, and displace the animals and
reptiles that live in the open area. The houses that have already been built are a true
eyesore to the landscape. Please keep Arizona open and free!! NO MORE HOMES on
Sonoran Desert Dr.
Thank you.
Patricia Kite
Page 1012
From: Cassandra M Leone
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Taylor Morrison Rezoning Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 2:05:33 PM
Dear Councilman Waring, Miss Wilson, and Village Committee,
My name is Cassandra Leone and I am a longtime Cave Creek resident, Northern Arizona
University graduate with a BS in Environmental Studies, hiker, biker, and state lover.
I would like to express my absolute disinterest in approving Taylor Morrison's rezoning
request for MacEwen 480.
This development touts itself as a premiere living space, when in reality, expanding the
already unnecessary development of Sonoran Desert Parkway will result in a slew of issues for
Cave Creek and Phoenix residents.
Increased traffic along the Parkway, which is already affected by work rush hours, will likely
increase the amount of accidents seen in this area. I'm afraid that these accidents will come at
the cost of bikers, runners, and recreation enthusiasts - people who are utilizing one of the only
open spaces left in North Phoenix/Cave Creek to enjoy their preferred sports.
In addition to my fear of this community changing the landscape and overall beauty of the
Sonoran Desert Preserve and Apache Wash Trailhead, I'm afraid that it will also affect local
wildlife, and further accelerate our increasing global temperature. Currently, the land along
Sonoran Desert Parkway cools the moment the sun drops, and continues to be an oasis within
the concrete of cookie cutter houses along Cave Creek Road.
I beg of you to reconsider allowing more homes to be built than already approved. As it is, the
MacEwen 480 development is detested among many desert dwellers, as our views and peace
are slowly scraped away by development. Please do not allow any further expansion in this
area.
Sincerely,
Cassandra Leone
480-323-9694
Cassandra Marie Leone
Page 1013
From: Bob Thompson
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Planned development off of Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Thursday, April 4, 2019 12:46:47 PM
Hi, I would like to voice my opposition to any rezoning for the planned development of the
area near the Apache Wash Trailhead. The area today is a beautiful expanse of desert and I
feel it would be wrong to allow high density development along the Sonoran Drive corredor. I
encourage you to keep the zoning as it is today.
Thanks,
Bob
Robert E. Thompson
(M) 314-568-1314
mrrobertthompson@hotmail.com
Page 1014
From: LISA GALLAGHER
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Mayor Gallego; Council District 2 PCC; Council District 1 PCC; Council District 3 PCC;
Council District 4; Council District 5 PCC; Council District 6 PCC; Council District 7 PCC; district.8@phoenix.gov
Subject: OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD REZONING
Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 4:32:09 PM
Please don't ruin my neighborhood!! I strongly OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD
REZONING!! I drive Sonoran Desert Parkway on a regular basis and it is so
beautiful!! To allow developers to over develop the land adjacent to it would
be a disgrace to our desert and a complete disservice to the residents and
taxpayers of the nearby communities, out city and our state in general.
Approving this rezoning would open the door for other developers to do the
same and before we know it the beautiful desert and the scenic drive will be
gone!
OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD REZONING!!
Sincerely,
Lisa Gallagher
2425 W Bronco Butte Trail #1034
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Page 1015
From: jean brady
To: jim@jimwaring.com; PDD Desert View VPC; Mayor Gallego; Council District 1 PCC; Council District 3 PCC; Council
District 4; Council District 5 PCC; Council District 6 PCC; Council District 7 PCC; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 6:40:27 PM
I am writing to formally oppose the proposed development by Taylor Morrison of a property along
the Sonoran Desert Drive.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve serves as a natural, archaeological, & recreational area, as well as
to provide protection against flooding.
There has been discussion of the need to expand Sonoran Desert Drive to 3 lanes each way for
access to Cave Creek Road. This traffic study should be done at the expense of the developer
who should then have to seriously contribute to this expense. Cave Creek Road is already unable
to handle the traffic turning onto Sonoran Desert Drive, imagine adding an additional 2500-3000
cars!
The impact of traffic, human waste, pets, garbage, and the general encroachment onto open land
would be immense; this development can only have an extremely negative impact.
Please, do not allow this re-zoning. This would open the door for every developer that follows.
Sincerely,
Jean Brady
Page 1016
From: Council District 1 PCC
To: Kaelee Wilson
Cc: Racelle Escolar
Subject: FW: MacEwan 480 rezoning
Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 3:28:53 PM
Andrea Gaston
Council District 1 Office
602-262-7444
From: Daniel Centilli [mailto:daniel.centilli@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:10 PM
To: Council District 1 PCC
Subject: MacEwan 480 rezoning
Dear Councilwoman Thelda Williams,
My name is Daniel Centilli. I am a Phoenix homeowner in Desert Ridge.
I am actively organizing my community in opposition to Taylor Morrison’s proposal to rezone land
along Sonoran Desert Drive. We are paying attention, and we are not happy. Expect to be hearing
from us.
This letter is in regards to the MacEwan 480 PUD rezoning proposal, along Sonoran Desert Drive. I
am strongly opposed to the rezoning proposal, and I hope that you will take the time to investigate
this proposal closely. The north valley community is united in opposition to this development. The
developer has asked for for the removal of ‘Desert Character Overlay’ and the removal of ‘S-1’
zoning on a parcel of land that is immediately adjacent to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
A change in zoning will result in the building of more than 1400 homes in the same 473 acre
property. This will set precedent for any future development. It does not honor the vision of the
Planners of the Sonoran Desert Preserve. It will turn Sonoran Desert Drive into a dangerous, traffic
congested thorofare. It will no longer be the scenic drive that it was intended to be. We expect to
see pedestrian and cyclist deaths. There has already been an increase in automobile accidents as
drivers lose patience with the increased traffic. The developer will not be bearing the cost of road
infrastructure. The city has no immediate plan to address the increased traffic. We we told by the
developer that the city plans to address it in the 8-10 year time frame. Not acceptable.
A change in zoning degrades the more than $300 million dollar investment that the City of Phoenix
undertook to purchase preserve land. This is not good stewardship of city assets! The value of the
preserve is largely in its rural character, which is protected by “Desert Character Overlay” and ‘S-1’
zoning. What’s next is the complete intrusion of more dense development, spurred by this change,
Page 1017
and the precedent it will set.
Can we trust you to safeguard the investment our community has made?
A vote in favor of this change in zoning is a vote against the quality of life in my community. Our
current zoning makes an effort to protect our quality of life, the character of the Sonoran Desert
Preserve, and the will of our community to have shared public open space. We say, “Let them build
in accordance with current zoning. No changes, no exceptions.”
You as a city council member have an opportunity to do the right thing. Or not. We’re paying
attention.
A yes vote for rezoning would be a signal to us that this big corporation headquartered in Scottsdale,
not Phoenix, has an unequal say in what happens in our community. We are not ok with that. We’re
looking to our representatives to represent us first. Protect our community.
Please vote NO on the MacEwan 480 rezoning.
Thank you,
Daniel Centilli
*******
Page 1018
From: Council District 1 PCC
To: Kaelee Wilson
Cc: Racelle Escolar
Subject: FW: MacEwen 480
Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:31:20 PM
Andrea Gaston
Council District 1 Office
602-262-7444
From: Christine Severance [mailto:tutudoc1@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:02 PM
To: Council District 1 PCC
Subject:
Good morning.
I am writing to clearly state my opposition to the proposed development by Taylor Morrison of a
property named MacEwen480.
Reasons I oppose this include:
a) The proposed rezoning changes to the Desert Overlay District will open the door to urban sprawl
into this and other "State Trust Lands" that were originally created to maintain The Sonoran Desert
Preserve as a natural, archaeological, & recreational area, as well as provide protection against
flooding in the Maricopa Flood Control District.
b) The Taylor Morrison developer has not presented an adequate traffic study that identifies the
road improvements described in their proposal. There has been discussion of the need to expand
Sonoran Desert Drive to 3 lanes each way for access to Cave Creek Road. This traffic study should be
done at the expense of the developer so that necessary negotiations between the City of Phoenix
and Taylor Morrison can take place. The developer should plan their portion of this expense and
present it at future public meetings of the community. Cave Creek Road is already unable to contain
the change in traffic patterns, an additional 1400+ homes would overburden the roads.
c) The developer has not yet articulated the details of their plans about mitigation of the impact
their project will have on the Maricopa Flood Control District. The City of Phoenix should require
public presentation of the plans to protect the City from future claims from owners of present and
future owners of homes in the Flood Control District.
As someone who has enjoyed the Sonoran Desert Preserve for hiking and biking regularly over the
last 5 years, I am appalled at the suggested change in zoning. The preserve is meant to protect our
Page 1019
delicate desert ecosystem and the animals and native plants in the area. Combined with the impact
of traffic, human waste, pets, garbage, and the general encroachment onto open land, this
development can only have an extremely negative impact.
Please, do not allow this re-zoning. There are other areas that can be developed that will not have an
impact on the preserve, flood zone, and current residents.
Thank you for your time
Christine Severance
*******
Page 1020
From: Turner Justin
Subject: I oppose the MacEwan 480 PUD rezoning!
Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 9:56:30 PM
Hello,
My name is Justin Turner. My wife & I and our 2 young children live in Tatum
Highlands (85331) and appreciate all that the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve offers not
only the residents of the Valley but also many visitors each year. Our family and the
residents of Phoenix oppose the MacEwan 480 rezoning. PLEASE VOTE NO!! This
would negatively impact the Sonoran Desert Preserve as well as the Maricopa Flood
Control System. In addition, I do not believe that the developer has done their due
diligence in conducting traffic and environmental impact studies for this proposed
change. In speaking of Arizona, President Teddy Roosevelt once said, "Arizona has
a natural wonder which is in kind absolutely unparalleled throughout the rest of the
world. I want to ask you to keep this great wonder of nature as it now is."
Save Our Sonoran Preserve speaks for me. Thank you for your support & PLEASE
VOTE NO.
Justin Turner C) 602-618-7883
Page 1021
From: stephanie
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran preserve
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 6:35:20 PM
Hello,
As a Phoenix resident for the past eleven years I am writing to respectfully request that you
NOT allow the MacEwan 480 PUD Rezoning. Please think of the long term effects for the
environment and the increased demands for water that the project would bring to our desert
state.
Thank you,
Stephanie Dinner
Page 1022
From: hazardousheelers
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Opposition of the MacEwan 480
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 9:14:01 PM
I realize the likelyhood of someone caring what I have to say it not in my favor but I
am devastated to hear about this proposed development near Apache trail wash. I
have had my horses in Desert hills for as long as I can remember and from day one I
dreamed of living out here. I put myself through school year after year to earn my
master's degree in special education. I worked my way through the ranks in the
school district until I got my dream job with a decent salary and I finally was able to
buy a house in desert hills right next to the Sonoran desert preserve. The peace and
quiet and small town feel is everything I could have ever dreamed of. Please don't
allow some faceless sycophant to steal what I have worked years for to achieve. Not
only do I worry for myself and my family's enjoyment but as a teacher I can see the
devastation additional students will do to our Deer Valley and Cave creek's already
overwhelmed school districts. You are considering allowing these greedy money
grubbing individuals to impact our future generation's level of education. After red for
ed I would think it would be obvious that pushing students into areas already
inundated with a huge population dooms the current student base to a mediocre and
inadequate education due to overpacked classrooms. Please remember the little
people when you review this decision. Please remember the students desperate for
attention and support and the teachers who are barely hanging on as it is. Please
remember the sacrifices and endless work I put in to be able to buy my dream home
in a quiet desert location. I am hoping common decency will outweigh profit in this
case.
Thank you,
Lindsey Zvara
Hazardousheelers@yahoo.com
Page 1023
From: scott stearne
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Taylor Morrison 480 Development
Date: Friday, May 17, 2019 3:15:03 PM
Hello, my name is Scott Stearne. I live in Cave Creek..I wanted to reach out and speak about
my opposition to the 480 rezoning request by Taylor Morrison.
Honestly I don't understand how Phoenix can even consider this zoning request. Traffic in this
North Phx area is already a growing problem and concern. Additionally, water is also a huge
concern for our entire state. I used to live in Desert Hills, and area that I'm sure you know has
serious water problems. I am having a real problem with Phoenix continuing to literally punch
holes in the ground day after day and allowing new homes to be built, seemingly with no
concerns over the water table dropping. You may know that over the past decades that the
water table has dropped almost 200 feet in certain areas. And yet, new Wells are still put in.
Now, with a new development in the Sonoran Preserve, that will put additional strains on city
water use and delivery. We should all be looking far into the future to assess the States water
needs..We just had a drought that lasted 10 years. We don't know when the next one will
happen and how long it may last. People are already claiming the drought to be over, which is
leading to more usage and less conservation. That's a serious concern for all of us. And, 1400
homes are going to use an enormous amount of a prescious limited resource.
Trash is another concern. Another 1400 homes produce huge amounts of trash, how long can
we just dump in the land fills? They don't last forever as you know.
Then we have the issue of density. 4 homes per acre is unacceptable. The preserve is s delicate
beautiful place. Let's keep it that way. Please keep the zoning to low density as the original
plan calls for. I know we can't just stop the development as a whole, I'd like to. I love open
space and it's a valuable resource for all of us to enjoy. But that resource is gradually
disappearing.
I ask you to please vote to keep 480 a low density zone. Taylor Morrison will survive, our
beautiful desert may not in the long term. I have many other concerns that can't be expressed
in an email..I'm sure you can get the idea here though.
I thank you for allowing my opinion to be considered.
Most Respectfully,
Scott Stearne
Technical Support Specialists
36721 North 25th St
Cave Creek AZ
619-733-6700
Page 1024
Page 1025
Racelle Escolar
From: Andrea Galyean
Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2019 4:32 PM
To: Racelle Escolar
Subject: MacEwen 480 PUD application
Hello:
For your information and for the members of the Planning Commission, please see the attached letter for the
position of the Arizona Mountaineering Club regarding the proposed rezoning of the MacEwen 480. The
original letter was sent to the City Council on July 1. Complete text follows:
July 1, 2019
Phoenix Mayor and Phoenix City Council Members
200 West Washington Street, 11th Floor
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
RE: MacEwen 480 PUD Application, third submittal Jan. 10, 2019
Dear Mayor Gallego and Members of the City Council:
The Arizona Mountaineering Club, a 501(c)(7) not‐for‐profit organization based in Phoenix, Arizona, is a
recreational club focused on mountaineering and rock climbing. We provide outdoor education and
experiences and advocate to protect climbing resources.
As such, Arizona Mountaineering Club is opposed to the request by real estate development company Taylor
Morrison that the city waive established zoning requirements in order to allow a master planned community
of up to 1,420 houses on 472 acres bordering the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. Our objection is grounded in the
belief that the Desert Character Overlay and Preserve Edge Guidelines were put in place to avoid precisely the
scenario being proposed, with higher density housing and related hardscape development abutting the
Preserve.
Access to outdoor recreation is a major asset and a key attraction for the City. The Overlay now in place
maintains the natural desert character of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, providing a respite from the built
environment for the good of residents, visitors, and native wildlife.
All of those needs are reflected in the current regulations, which preserve those limited assets for the greater
benefit of the City. Therefore, we ask that you maintain the Overlay and reject any proposal that does not
conform to that Overlay.
Sincerely,
Andrea Galyean
Page 1026
Vice President, Arizona Mountaineering Club
4340 East Indian School Road, #21‐164
Phoenix, Arizona 85018
www.arizonamountaineeringclub.net
copies:
Members: City of Phoenix Planning Committee
Members: Desert View Village Planning Committee
Alan Stephenson, Director, City of Phoenix Planning Department
Kaylee Wilson, City of Phoenix Planner, Village of Desert View
Ingir Erickson, Director, City of Phoenix Parks Department
Sara Parks, Chair, City of Phoenix Parks Board
Gary Kirkilas, Save Our Sonoran Preserve founder
Page 1027
From: Rich Mogull
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Preserve Desert Sonoran Drive
Date: Saturday, October 26, 2019 9:33:53 AM
I am writing to express my extreme concern over the rezoning application by Taylor Morrison
on Desert Sonoran Drive.
I am not anti-development, but all too often in Phoenix developers purchase land under the
assumption that they will not need to comply with current zoning laws. This has created an
incredible moral hazard in Phoenix that, as citizens, makes it effectively impossible for us to
make decisions on where to live with any expectations that laws and zoning will be respected
in the future.
This situation is especially egregious since we will lose an incredible community resource not
to benefit constituents, but merely one developer that clearly never planned to worry about the
low density zoning.
That area is entirely reasonable for development under the existing zoning. Increasing the
density and removing the look and feel requirements will permanently destroy the quality of
life of all constituents in the area and the city at large who use the preserve.
I implore you to keep the existing zoning and respect the residents of North Phoenix and
maintain our local resources instead of allowing Taylor Morrison to run roughshod over the
city.
Thank you,
Rich Mogull
3640 E Louise Dr
Phoenix, AZ
Page 1028
From: Christopher Kowalsky
To: Toni Duenas
Cc: Julianna Pierre
Subject: RE: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
Date: Friday, February 11, 2022 2:31:34 PM
Attachments: image001.png
Toni,
In reading this it appears that they are referring to the Verdin development that is going through a
current zoning entitlement case with PDD. I am CC’ing the village planner on this email who oversees
that process in this area.
Julianna, please find the attached email.
Thanks,
Chris
From: Streets P STR
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 2:16 PM
To: Christopher Kowalsky
Subject: FW: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
Hi Chris,
Is this something you can assist with?
Thank you,
Toni Dueñas
Administrative Secretary to Kini L.E. Knudson
602-262-6136
From: D
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 12:29 PM
To: Receptionist PKS; Streets P STR
Subject: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
Hello,
I’m just writing this knowing not much can be done about the never ending development of our gorgeous Sonoran
Desert…
Page 1029
But building on areas that used to be a preserve, building regardless of the natural, social and aesthetic value of
the land makes yet another development even more upsetting.
These ugly roof-to-roof homes are just concrete monstrosities created and “designed” without any respect and
correspondence with the surrounding nature - regardless of how much the developer will try to convince everyone
of a natural and "organic" feel and preservation of native habitats. 1420 homes cannot be organic - as it will
irreversibly damage the natural beauty of the desert and create even more traffic in areas that used to offer
incredible peace and views.
I truly don't understand how it's done - we see the impact already and it's so incredibly sad we don't give our land
more appreciation. One day, it'll all be gone - is there something that can be done about it today?
:(
Page 1030
From: PDD Zoning Adjustment
To: Samantha Keating; Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Reject Zoning Application Z-62-18
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 3:32:01 PM
Samantha/Juliana,
Is Z-62-18 moving forward? We received a comment email in the ZA mailbox. Please see
below.
Thank you,
Tricia Gomes, Zoning Administrator
Office: 602-262-4870 Email: tricia.gomes@phoenix.gov
► Planning & Development Department
Planning Division, Zoning Section
200 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix
From: MITCH LISWITH
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:58 PM
To: PDD Zoning Adjustment
Subject: Reject Zoning Application Z-62-18
As a Phoenix Park Steward, I am writing to ask you to reject Zoning Application Z-62-18. The
Sonoran Desert Preserve was created in 1998 to conserve open space from home
development. Groups worked hard to preserve the land surrounding Sonoran Desert Drive by
getting a zoning ordinance passed for a Desert Character Overlay, written to mandate low
density housing and maintain wildlife and desert view corridors along the Sonoran Preserve
Border.
This 480-acre parcel is known as Verdin (previously MacEwen 480). Listed in their narrative for
rezoning, "the property is uniquely situated as the only large, privately owned parcel
surrounded by the Sonoran Preserve and with access to Sonoran Desert Drive. Other parcels
surrounding MacEwen 480 are undeveloped and owned by the City, ASLD or FCD and
designated by the City as future Sonoran Preserve priorities". Rather than adhere to the
Desert Character Overlay zoning of 1 to 2 homes per acre on the land, Taylor Morrison (the
developer) wants 2 to 5 homes per acre on the entirety of the property. Over the past few
years, the developer has been trying to get the area rezoned from a low-density zone to a
high-density zone.
I am asking that the Desert Character Overlay designations be adhered to. I can't imagine the
damage to the desert that a huge subdivision right in the middle of open space would cause!
Page 1031
Sincerely,
Mitchell Liswith
1638 W. Royal Palm Rd.
Phoenix, AZ 85021
Page 1032
Page 1033
From: Nancy Vetter
To: PDD North Gateway VPC; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Proposed development by Taylor Morrison along Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 9:33:28 PM
Dear Desert View Village Members,
I am emailing you to express my concerns regarding a proposed development by Taylor Morrison along
Sonoran Desert Drive. I have many objections to this possible development and would welcome the
opportunity to discuss with you but for now would like to address the traffic issues this development will
create..
I live in Sonoran Foothills in a community called Desert Enclave. We have one entrance into this
community and it is from Dove Valley Road. At that point the road goes from a four lane road to a two
lane road with traffic heading east and west.
During each work day, Monday through Friday during peak times long lines of cars passing our entrance
have been observed making entering and exiting our community difficult and dangerous. Adding
additional homes off of this road will only add to the problem.
The extension of the 303 from I 17 to Cave Creek Road could offer some relief but my understanding is
that funds have not been allocated for this extension now or in the near future.
I would welcome your support in opposing this development.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Nancy Vetter
32618 N 16th Glen
Phoenix, Az 85085
602-881-3273
Page 1034
From: Gordon Hutchinson
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Taylor Morrison Verdin Development
Date: Thursday, December 2, 2021 11:50:19 AM
Julianna,
I am writing to you about the proposal to rezone 480 acres (Z-62-18-2) for development south
of Sonoran Desert Drive between 16th and 24th street alignments.
As a resident of Sonoran Gate, my concern is traffic volume along Dove Valley Rd and Sonoran
Desert Drive. Traffic volumes appear to be increasing on these roads in both directions as an
east west throughfare between Cave Creek Road and I17.
Are traffic studies completed or planned to measure traffic volumes on these roads? Are
there studies that project increases in traffic volume from the addition of approximately 1,400
new homes from this development?
Is this development contingent upon funding road improvements to accommodate increased
traffic volumes? Is limiting commercial vehicle traffic to local access being considered?
Thank you,
Gordon Hutchinson
Page 1035
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:15:49 AM
From: Lora Terrill
Date: Monday, December 6, 2021 at 5:55 PM
To: jim@jimwaring.com
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-Zoning (Z-62-18-2). We love our
Sonoran Preserve and want the City of Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1.
Thank you,
Lora Terrill
2517 E. Ridge Creek Road
Phoenix AZ 85024
*******
Page 1036
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 4:18:01 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
From: coco whitaker
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 4:17 PM
To: jim@jimwaring.com
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-Zoning (Z-62-18-2). We love our
Sonoran Preserve and want the City of Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1.
Thank you,
Coco Whitaker
3976 E Scout Pass, Phoenix, AZ 85050
*******
Page 1037
From: Christine M Pedersen
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Vote NO on MacEwen 480
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 3:33:29 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Monica Flint
Date: December 8, 2021 at 9:00:04 AM MST
To: jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Vote NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-
Zoning (Z-62-18-2). We love our Sonoran Preserve and want the City of
Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1.
Thank you,
Monica Flint
23624 N 57th Drive
Glendale AZ 85310
Page 1038
From: TIna Nuccio
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: I support the Taylor Morrison Verdin development on Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 12:00:58 PM
I am in favor the reasoning request from Taylor Morrison, for their proposed development on Sonoran Desert
Drive. Clearly we need more housing, and the average 3 homes/acre seems reasonable and in line with the
developments around it.
Thanks!
Page 1039
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive.
Date: Friday, December 10, 2021 7:54:24 AM
Please add to the public record.
From: Bob Thompson
Date: Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 7:59 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Cc: Terri Hotmail
Subject: Proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive.
Hi, I just attended the Desert View and North Gateway Planning Committee meetings, during which
there was a presentation about a proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive a little bit west
of cave creek road. It used to be called the McEwing 480, but I think it’s now called Verdin.
During the presentation many mentions of Sonoran Desert Dr as a major transportation corridor
were made.
I wanted to reach out to you to express my opposition to the development as well as any other
developments in this area. The Apache Wash area and the Sonoran Desert Preserve is a great natural
resource and wonderful recreational area.
I implore you to help preserve this area as it is without further development. With the already heavy
traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, no additional traffic or development is welcome. I hope we could
get the designation changed for Sonoran Desert Drive so that it is no longer considered a major
transportation corridor. I’d also like the rest of the area to be changed from state trust land to
preserve.
Please let me know your thoughts on this matter
Thanks,
Bob Thompson
Mrrobertthompson@hotmail.com
*******
Page 1040
From: Sonoran Preserve
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Message to VPC Members
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 10:17:25 AM
Hi Julianna,
I wanted to forward a message along with some documents to the members of both the
Desert View and North Gateway VPC regarding the MacEwan/Verdin PUD request. I
copied the message below and attached the documents.
Thank you!
-Gary
Dear Members of the Desert View and North Gateway VPC,
First, thank you for your service of representing our community on the VPC. Your time and
dedication is greatly appreciated and respected!Second, since Taylor Morrison’s presentation last
month, I have been researching the multitude of concerning factors with their PUD request including
increased traffic without an existing transportation infrastructure, building next to a floodplain, and
building 1,400 homes in the middle of the desert also without an existing plan for schools and other
necessary infrastructure. Particularly, their request to remove the Desert Character
Overlay Ordinance, a written law to protect the integrity of the Sonoran Preserve, is that of upmost
concern.
The ordinance is clear. It very specifically states its purpose is to “provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density” and should extend down to the “Dynamite Blvd alignment on
the south” in order to “maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and wildlife corridor along the Cave
Creek Wash.” These boundaries are carefully delineated based on ecosystems to ensure maximum
preservation among development.
It absolutely does not state anywhere that its intent is to only extend to where the Sonoran Desert
Drive may happen to be located, as Taylor Morrison’s lawyer contends as their basis for
circumventing the ordinance. This well-written ordinance is explicit and Taylor Morrison’s request
for us to remove the ordinance is not valid.
There is a committed force of citizens that care deeply about this, encompassing over 1,000
members of the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group and hundreds of folks from across the city that I
have spoken with in the preserve. Importantly, it also includes valued organizations and businesses
such as the City of Phoenix Desert Parks Department, hot air balloon companies, and hiking and rock
climbing groups.
I have attached their letters urging you to maintain the Desert Character Overlay, not only because
it’s a law, but because it’s meant to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve - one
of our community’s greatest assets and attractions!
Page 1041
Thank you again for your time. Please reach out to me with any questions or comments.
-Dr.Gary Kirkilas
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
PSPMMPC L to PRB March 28 2019… [drive.google.com]
Hot Air Expeditions Sonoran Preserve… [drive.google.com]
AMC letter Phoenix Preserve.pdf [drive.google.com]
Sonoran Preserve Opposition Letter.pdf [drive.google.com]
MacEwen.pdf [drive.google.com]
CB_ltr_2019_cmt.docx [docs.google.com]
Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480… [drive.google.com]
Page 1042
From: Samantha Keating
To: David Urbinato
Cc: Julianna Pierre
Subject: RE: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:20:16 PM
Attachments: image011.png
image012.png
image013.png
image014.png
image015.png
image016.png
image017.png
image018.png
Hi David,
This is in reference to Z-62-18. It is a PUD and no dates have been set for hearing. The
latest draft of the proposal is on the PUD page.
Julianna – let’s add this to the case file.
Thank you,
Samantha Keating
Principal Planner
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-262-6823
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: David Urbinato
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:14 PM
To: Samantha Keating
Subject: FW: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
Samantha, I just saw this one pop up in the Republic. But I can’t pin it down on the rezoning staff
report webpage.
David Urbinato
Management Assistant II
Phoenix Planning and Development Department
602-534-3630
From: Michael R Angulo
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:04 PM
To: David Urbinato
Subject: FW: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
David,
Do you know what project this constituent is referring to? Thanks!
Page 1043
Michael Angulo
Research & Policy Director
desk: 602-262-4822 cell: 602-478-6347
web: Phoenix.gov email: michael.angulo@phoenix.gov
200 W. Washington Street, 11th Floor
Phoenix AZ 85003
How can our office better communicate?
Click HERE to respond to our short survey
From: Council District 5 PCC
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 2:40 PM
To: Michael R Angulo
Subject: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
D5 Constituent public comment regarding a development project. How shall we respond?
Emmanuel Gallardo-Sanidad
Constituent Services Director
Main line: (602) 262-7446 Direct line: (602) 534-9721
Web: Phoenix.gov/district5
200 W. Washington Street, 11th Floor. Phoenix, AZ 85003
Page 1044
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:14 PM
To: Council District 5 PCC
Subject: emdist5 - Form Submission
FROM : Kyle Mickel
SUBJECT : Sonoran Preserve Development
MESSAGE : Councilmember Guardado,
Greetings. I am a supporter and a constituent. I am writing today after reading in the Az
Republic about the proposed development of 1400 homes near our beloved and precious
Sonoran Preserve. I wish to voice my extreme disappointment in this proposal and urge you to
oppose this large scale project which would severely impact the beauty, native vegetation,
desert wildlife and quality of life for residents who love to enjoy this truly beautiful and
remarkable area. We are very fortunate to have this grand mountain preserve in our back
yards. If you have not visited Apache Wash or any of the other magnificent hiking/biking
areas within the Sonoran Preserve lately, please re-visit this area to truly appreciate what we
have. Let's keep the Preserve and its desert inhabitants alive. Please voice your opposition to
this project when it comes before Council this Spring. Thank you.
Kyle Mickel
PS: Considering our severe water shortage, this project should not move forward on that basis
alone. But there exist so many other reasons to say no to this horrible concept.
Email : kylemickel4@gmail.com
AREA : 602
ADDRESS : 1808 W. Orangewood Ave
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : Az
ZIP : 85021
Submission ID: 0d168e3d18554c39a6752e0d7f81c44f
Form Submission On : 1/19/2022 1:14:04 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district5/email
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1045
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 9:25:28 AM
Hi Julianna,
Please add to the public record.
Thank you.
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 8:22 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Tina nuccio
SUBJECT : I support Verdin housing development near Sonoran Preserve
MESSAGE : Hi Jim. I want to voice my support for the proposed density of the Verdin
development. This area desperately needs more affordable housing and the area can easily
support the proposed density, given all of open space around it.
I am also a frequent biker/hiker (Apache Wash) in the area, so I do appreciate the amenities,
but know it was always intended to be developed partially.
If/when this is approved, if it is affordable enough, we will consider purchasing a home there.
Email : crn57370@gmail.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 549-8869
ADDRESS : 4450 e. Sierra sunset trail
CITY : Cave creek
STATE : Az
ZIP : 85331
Submission ID: 997d7a3ae3974fdc8684982db5123b90
Form Submission On : 1/19/2022 8:22:38 AM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Page 1046
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1047
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2022 2:46:48 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 2:28 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Kyle Mickel
SUBJECT : Sonoran Preserve Proposal
MESSAGE : Councilmember Waring,
Greetings. I am a 32-year Phoenix resident writing with concerns today after reading in the Az
Republic about the proposed development of 1400 homes near our beloved and precious
Sonoran Preserve. I wish to voice my extreme disappointment in this proposal and urge you to
oppose this large scale project which would severely impact the beauty, native vegetation,
desert wildlife and quality of life for residents who love to enjoy this truly beautiful and
remarkable area. We are very fortunate to have this grand mountain preserve in our back
yards. If you have not visited Apache Wash or any of the other magnificent hiking/biking
areas within the Sonoran Preserve lately, please re-visit this area to truly appreciate what we
have. Let's keep the amazing Preserve and its desert inhabitants alive. Please voice your
opposition to this project when it comes before Council this Spring. Thank you.
Kyle Mickel
PS: Considering our severe water shortage, this project should not move forward on that basis
alone. But there exist so many other reasons to say no to this horrible concept. I appreciate
your consideration.
Email : kylemickel4@gmail.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 299-6147
ADDRESS : 1808 W. Orangewood Ave.
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85021
Submission ID: ca17955446204320b564f8605e31035f
Form Submission On : 1/20/2022 2:28:17 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
Page 1048
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1049
Page 1050
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Verdin project support
Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 7:41:49 AM
Please add to the public record
From: Jennifer Ruby
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:32 PM
To: Jim Waring, Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin project support
Hello Councilman Waring -
We’ve met a few times; I’ve been a constituent of yours going back to your days in the State Senate.
I wanted to take a few minutes to express my support for the proposed Verdin project. Northeast
Phoenix has been a wonderful place for my family to live for decades, and I welcome Verdin’s
additional single-family housing options. With all the exciting new employment coming to North
Phoenix, we need more housing so that employees can build their lives here and continue to grow
our vibrant community. The overall low density is entirely appropriate for this area, and the
thoughtful design exhibited by the Edge Openness Plan will be an enhancement not only for Verdin
residents but also for the greater area. I’m particularly excited about the improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive which are badly needed and unlikely to happen without new development.
Finally, North Phoenix will be incredibly lucky to lay claim to a master plan certified by the National
Wildlife Federation. Talk about leading by example!
Please also share my support with the Village Planning Committees. Thank you for your time,
Jen
Jennifer Ruby
2333 E Chama Drive
Phoenix 85024
*******
Page 1051
From: Jennifer Ruby
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Fwd: Verdin project support
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 8:54:48 PM
Hi Ms. Pierre -
I wanted to share with you my email of support for the Verdin project. I find the project’s
application materials to be very thoughtful and comprehensive. It’s rare lately to see a project
proposing only single-family detached housing...compare for example the recent projects
adjacent to where I live: Sendero Foothills and Stone Butte East, both of which include higher
density/intensity and attached product.
I believe this project will be great for North Phoenix. Thank you for your hard work getting it
to this point.
Jen Ruby
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jennifer Ruby
Subject: Verdin project support
Date: March 7, 2022 at 8:32:35 PM MST
To: jim.waring@phoenix.gov, council.district.2@phoenix.gov
Hello Councilman Waring -
We’ve met a few times; I’ve been a constituent of yours going back to your days
in the State Senate. I wanted to take a few minutes to express my support for the
proposed Verdin project. Northeast Phoenix has been a wonderful place for my
family to live for decades, and I welcome Verdin’s additional single-family
housing options. With all the exciting new employment coming to North Phoenix,
we need more housing so that employees can build their lives here and continue to
grow our vibrant community. The overall low density is entirely appropriate for
this area, and the thoughtful design exhibited by the Edge Openness Plan will be
an enhancement not only for Verdin residents but also for the greater area. I’m
particularly excited about the improvements to Sonoran Desert Drive which are
badly needed and unlikely to happen without new development.
Finally, North Phoenix will be incredibly lucky to lay claim to a master plan
certified by the National Wildlife Federation. Talk about leading by example!
Please also share my support with the Village Planning Committees. Thank you
for your time,
Jen
Jennifer Ruby
Page 1052
2333 E Chama Drive
Phoenix 85024
Page 1053
From: Ann Griffith
To: Jim Waring; Julianna Pierre
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Taylor Morrison Verdin Master Planned Community
Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 10:44:41 AM
Mr. Waring & Ms. Pierre,
After reading the recent Valley Vibe News article about the pushback on this proposed
development from the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group, I wanted to voice a counter opinion
for consideration.
I absolutely support the need to preserve the beauty and natural wildlife of our Arizona
deserts…it’s what makes Arizona such a beautiful place to live. However, I also understand the
economic importance of development to foster business development, attract the best
employers and sustain a generational workforce.
Our son, a recent CU graduate, relocated back to Phoenix after accepting an offer for his first
professional career position. His home search was challenging. After realizing he could afford
a mortgage that was comparable to the average rent, he set his sights on new home
ownership. It was extremely difficult to find new communities that were more central to his
work and that fit the lifestyle he was looking to experience.
The Sonoran Desert/I-17 corridor was a target area for him due to location and proximity to
shopping, entertainment and outdoor activities. However, what he found were thousands of
new/planned apartments. If this community were further along and offered affordable options
for first-time buyers, it would have been a strong consideration.
The vision for Verdin is beautiful. It strikes a critical balance between community and nature.
Developers and home builders need to do more for preservation and sustainability. Taylor
Morrison is setting a gold standard here. As you consider future development in this area, I do
ask that you challenge your developers and home builders to exceed the standard that is being
set here. I’d also ask that communities offer more affordable options for first time home
buyers (e.g. townhomes).
Sincerely,
Ann Griffith
Page 1054
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1055
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1056
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1057
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1058
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting April 2, 2019
Request From S-1 DCOD (155.14 acres), S-1 (343.04 acres) and RE-
35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (pending PUD) (165.99 acres) and PUD
(343.04 acres)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, gave a presentation of the case up to this point in time. She
stated that they started this process back in August. Ms. Demmitt went through the
General Plan history of the area, along with the Desert Character Overlay District
establishment. She summarized the infrastructure improvements that would be required
for the subdivision to be built. Ms. Demmitt went on to describe the comments the
developer is receiving from members of the public. The first comment was that the
property should stay S-1. Ms. Demmitt stated that staying S-1 would be one home per
acre. Having a subdivision with multiple sized lots/homes would be more affordable for
residents to live in proximity to the preserve.
The next comment from the public that was addressed is the condition of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Ms. Demmitt stated they are working with the City and the State Land
Department to evaluate. She went on to present pages form the 2002 council report that
indicated that at full capacity, Sonoran Desert Drive will be able to handle 50,000 cars a
day. The road was intended to be a major thoroughfare.
The next concern Ms. Demmitt addressed was the acquisition of Sonoran Preserve
Land. She went on to state that the MacEwen property has been privately held since the
1950’s. Taylor Morrison is agreeable to put a public trail through the center of the
property, adjacent to the wash corridor, to connect the preserve north and south of
Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated they will comply with the Sonoran Edge Treatment
Guidelines. Ms. Demmitt stated the City’s Park and Recreation Department is currently
looking at acquiring the land to the east of the MacEwen parcel for preserve.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1059
Lou Lagrave stated that he understands that Sonoran Desert Drive is intended to be a
six-lane arterial and the General Plan on the southern two-thirds of the property has the
land use designation that supports the proposed density but that he still has concerns.
Mr. Lagrave stated that he is concerned about the traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, how
the kids will get to school and the proposed lot sizes.
Susan Demmitt addressed Mr. Lagrave and stated that they are looking into what they
can do to alleviate some of the concerns regarding Sonoran Desert Drive but the
construction of the southern leg is 47 million dollars. She stated that the kids that live in
this development will have the option of attending either Deer Valley Schools or Cave
Creek Schools. She stated that both school districts will be providing bus service into
the neighborhood.
Jill Hankins asked if the Mesquite Wash is a 404 wash. Susan Demmitt referred to
Nguyen Lam on her development team. Mr. Lam stated they are disturbing less than an
acre and it is not within the 404-protected area. Ms. Hankins asked if there have been
any studies done regarding cultural items or protected species. Mr. Lam stated the
studies have been done and nothing was found.
Doug Dickson stated that the committee has received many emails opposition and not
one in support. Doug Dickson stated that they should talk to State Land about swapping
this parcel for a better suited piece of land. He asked if the applicant had explored this
option. Ms. Demmitt stated that the City hasn’t identified this piece of land as preserve
land, but they have not discussed a swap with State Land.
Steve Bowser stated that the committee has letters in front of them in opposition from
the Sierra Club and PMPC.
Steve Bowser read the cards in opposition that didn’t wish to speak.
The floor was opened for public comment.
Debra Sedillo Dugan, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic and views. She
said the signs were posted where no one could see them until the applicant recently
moved them.
John Furniss, resident, stated he is the Chair of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve
Committee for the Parks and Recreation Department. He said there should be a letter
from their committee to deny this project. He stated that they aren’t opposed to growth,
but this will set precedence and that we need to protect what he have.
Stacie Beute, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She has been a longtime
friend to the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and advises on committees. She said that
Taylor Morrison will be selling the homes with the added amenity of the proximity to the
preserve, but they are developing on the preserve. She stated she is concerned about
the impacts on the environment.
Amanda Farr, resident, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is currently a safe place to
cycle and run. If this development is approved, it will no longer be safe.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1060
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated that he is a Park Steward for the Phoenix Mountain
Preserve. He stated that he started the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group as an
advocacy group in response to the request. He stated that the proposal isn’t consistent
with the North Land Use Plan and the Desert View Character Plan. Mr. Kirkilas urged
the committee that if it doesn’t make sense, say no to the proposal.
Daniel Centilli, resident, stated that he is a Desert Ridge homeowner. He said the
current DCOD overlay prevents something like this proposal from happening. He stated
that the applicant is asking for exceptions to the law. He went on to state the preserve is
our legacy.
Patrick Havley, resident, thanked the committee. He stated he is concerned for the
safety of cyclists on Sonoran Desert Drive. He also stated this project won’t contribute
to the overall good of the City.
Gannon Burleigh, resident, said that he is opposed and has concerns about traffic,
schools and the impact on the preserve. He said that the project is irresponsible
development and that the removal of the overlay district that protects the preserve is
ridiculous.
Laura Jones, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated the development should be one acre lots to preserve the wildlife.
Patrick McMullen, resident, states that he is the President of the PMPC. He stated that
the Phoenix Mountain Preserve Council has been around since the 1970’s to preserve
the desert. He stated that PMPC is opposed to the request.
Mandy Fellows, resident, passed out a study from an ASU professor concerning the
ecological impact and flooding concerns in the area. She stated that this area is
downstream from three dams, with the closest dam being 1.5 miles away.
John Trojan, resident, stated he is opposed to the request with concerns about traffic,
pedestrian safety and allowing the developer to craft their own zoning standards.
Lainy Porter, resident, stated she moved to Arizona for pain management. She stated
that she trains for triathlons on Sonoran Desert Drive and is concerned about the
increase in traffic.
Claudia Wagner, resident, stated she is a trail runner and has concerns about the
danger the increased traffic with cause on Sonoran Desert Drive. She is also concerned
about the potential for flooding.
Heather Larson, resident, stated she is concerned about the increase in traffic and
pedestrian safety.
Tim Holt, resident, said that he moved to Phoenix from Seattle. He said this proposal is
just setting precedence and the next development will be even more dense. Mr. Holt
went on to state this project is about money and greed.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1061
Brett Scholar, resident, stated that he uses Sonoran Desert Drive to run and cycle. He
questioned the benefit the applicant will bring to the area. He stated that the property
should stay as it is currently zoned.
Lindsey Tillman, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She said that the City
needs to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
Susan Beccian, resident, stated that she is one of the only people that have received
letters about this case but didn’t receive one concerning the meeting tonight. She said
she is concerned that Gammage and Burnham isn’t being upfront with the community.
Cassandra Leone, resident, thanked her neighbors for coming out to oppose the zoning
request. She said she is concerned about pedestrian safety and the traffic on Sonoran
Desert Drive. She said she has read the PUD and has concerns about the sustainability
section.
Michelle Kelley, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. She commented
that just because a plan is 30 years old doesn’t mean it’s not a good plan. It means the
community and the planning department were visioning long term. This request doesn’t
comply with the Desert View Character Plan. Ms. Kelley went on to state that the school
is over capacity and there is no real plan from the applicant to resolve that issue. She
closed by stating the area should be preserved and the plans should not be changed.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. Ms. Pierce went on to
state that this project is going to be a financial burden on taxpayers. Even though the
applicant must pay to extend infrastructure, the taxpayers pay to maintain this
infrastructure that is being extended to only serve this subdivision.
Christine Severance, resident, stated that that the signs for the hearing were posted far
from the road so they couldn’t be read. She stated the applicant purchased the property
with the current zoning and that it shouldn’t be changed.
Karen Severance, resident, stated that the preserve means a lot to her. She urged the
committee to think about the ecosystem when they vote on this case at a later date.
Jennifer Severance, resident, stated that nature needs to have space. The edges of the
preserve are important.
Karl Mar, resident, stated that he is opposed to the request. He said that the
infrastructure can’t handle a development of this size.
Patty Killinger, resident, stated that she has been in the area since the 1970’s. She said
that the parcel’s adjacency to the Sonoran Preserve is important.
Anna Lewandowski, resident, stated she just found out about the project about two
weeks ago and came to the meeting to learn more about it. She said from listening to
the applicant’s presentation and the testimony of the public, it sounds like this
development is 10 years too soon. The current infrastructure and school systems can’t
handle the residents this development will generate.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1062
Mike Rooney, resident, stated this project is political. This development is not consistent
with the Desert View Character Plan.
Patricia Story, resident, stated that she is concerned for public safety in the areas. She
said the area already has an emergency response time issue.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1063
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 6, 2018
Request From S-1 DCOD (155.14 acres), S-1 (343.04 acres) and RE-
35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (pending PUD) (165.99 acres) and PUD
(343.04 acres)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately build
1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan.
Lou Lagrave had questions regarding the alignment of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated
it is a nice development in the wrong location and that there is no justification for the
density. He stated that according to the North Land Use Plan that this area is intended
to be 2 dwelling units per acre or less.
Rick Nowell clarified that the applicant would only be adding one lane in front of their
own development, not the entire length of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated it is a nice
project in the wrong place. He stated that Sanctuary at Desert Ridge is unsightly and he
doesn’t want to see that in this location.
Rick Powell asked which school district in which the property is located. Ms. Demmitt
said Deer Valley.
Steve Bowser asked how long the land has been privately held. Ms. Demmitt stated
since the 1950’s.
Ryan Schaefer asked if the developer was contributing to the Sonoran Desert Drive
alignment. Ms. Demmitt said the subdivision will be contributing to impact fees.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1064
Jill Hankins expressed concern about the safety of the cyclists on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated there needs to be an underpass and islands for the bikers.
Steve Bowser opened the meeting to public comment.
Richard Puleri, resident, stated he has concerns about the current traffic congestion on
Sonoran Desert Drive and inquired on when Sonoran Desert Drive will be expanded
and connected.
Michael Kaciemba, resident, stated he lives in Sonoran Foothills and that he has
concerns about the current traffic congestion. He stated that this project shouldn’t be
improved until the streets are expanded. He also addressed the school doesn’t have
capacity.
Public comment closed.
Reginald Younger said that Taylor Morrison expanded the roads with Sky Crossing.
Rick Powell states he has concerns about the school capacity.
Deanna Chew asked if residents would have a City of Phoenix address. Ms. Demmitt
stated she believes they will.
Rick Nowell asked if a traffic study has been done. Ms. Demmitt says it was recently
completed but has not been submitted to the City yet.
There was a brief committee discussion concerning the possibility of age restriction
subdivisions within the development.
Louis Lagrave stated he believes in land rights but this needs to come back with R1-10
zoning. Louis Lagrave also requested staff send out the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1065
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1066
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1067
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2018
Request From S-1 DCOD (155.14 acres), S-1 (343.04 acres) and RE-
35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (pending PUD) (165.99 acres) and PUD
(343.04 acres)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480 PUD. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately
build 1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan. She stated they are working
with the Deer Valley School District to come up with a solution to the school capacity
issue. She stated they are looking into the option of Cave Creek Schools.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, expressed several concerns:
- Traffic safety and cyclist safety on Sonoran Desert Drive.
- Public safety response time.
- Elimination of the night sky.
- Density is too high.
He then asked if the applicant has been in communication with the State Land
Department to see when the surrounding land will be opened for auction. Susan
Demmitt stated it won’t be within the next 5 years.
Jason Stokes, VPC member, asked where the closest fire station is located. Ms.
Demmitt stated Cave Creek and Dynamite.
Steve Tucker, VPC member, asked what would happen in the notch. Ms. Demmitt
states most likely residential. Mr. Tucker stated that the road improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive need to happen before development.
Julie Read, VPC member, asked how many homes are approved for Sonoran Gate. Ms.
Demmitt responded 255 homes.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1068
Shannon Simon, VPC member, inquired about the City’s timeline for the complete build
out of Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated the light pollution from Sonoran Gate isn’t as
bad as she thought. Ms. Simon then asked if all the neighborhoods will be gated. Ms.
Demmitt responded that some neighborhoods will be gated.
Julie Read, VPC member, stated she has concerns about the school capacity issue and
the fact that some of the students could be going to Cave Creek Schools. She stated
that a neighborhood elementary school builds a sense of community. Ms. Read asked
what the target market will be for this development. Ms. Demmitt states they are still
trying to identify the target. Julie Read asked how many children there are in Sonoran
Gate. A resident in the audience who lives in Sonoran Gate stated about 1 in 8 homes
have kids.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated that Sonoran Gate has a lot of amenities for kids
so there might not be a lot of kids right now but they can come. She stated she is
concerned with the school capacity. She said that it is at least a 20 to 25-minute drive to
the closest Cave Creek elementary school by car, so it would be even longer by bus.
Susan Demmitt stated that Taylor Morrison is committed to working with the school
districts to find a solution.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated she is concerned about school buses going in and
out of the neighborhood with the traffic and the speeds vehicles travel along Sonoran
Desert Drive. She also stated open enrollment can be deceiving because students can
get kicked out of the school.
The floor was open to public comment.
Michelle Kelly, resident, stated she was opposed to the request. She stated she is
concerned about the density. She stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills, which is lower
in density than the proposed project. She stated that Sonoran Foothills Elementary land
was gifted by the developer. She is concerned about police and fire response times.
She stated the project is too dense without the proper infrastructure in place.
Burt Bragin, resident, voiced his concerns about Sonoran Desert Drive and the current
traffic. He stated the connection to the 303 needs to be made before the project is
approved. He stated Sonoran Foothills has 1,300 homes and a school was gifted by the
developer. He stated this development has 6 to 7 times more homes that Sonoran Gate.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that Deer Valley Schools doesn’t want a school site at
this location.
Cynthia Wise, resident, stated she is in favor of the request. She said Taylor Morrison
did a great job with the current infrastructure improvements within Sonoran Gate.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated he is a park steward for the Apache Wash trailhead. He
stated this development would change the entire character of the area. He then asked
the developer how they will make it look like the preserve.
J.R. Oliver, resident, stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills and has to wait a long time to
get out of her subdivision. She stated the connection to the 303 would help a lot.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1069
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that is more of a regional issue and to talk to the City’s
Street Transportation Department.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated she opposes the project and is a resident of Desert
Enclave. She said on the way to the meeting they had to wait until 56 cars went by to
turn out. She stated this development will have an adverse reaction on the desert
wildlife and preserve area. She stated this development is in contradiction of the
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
L. Chicchillo, resident, stated the current Taylor Morrison project looks like row houses.
He stated he lives in Desert Enclave and is worried about the traffic.
Spero Papos, resident, asked if the land had been purchased. The applicant confirmed
it had not been purchased yet. He inquired about traffic lights.
Julie Read, VPC member asked if the applicant has met with ADOT because they
would like to see more information about the project.
There was then a committee discussion about how Dove Valley Road, Cave Creek
Road and 27th Avenue all get flooded out in the monsoon storms.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, stated that the North Gateway minutes will be forwarded onto
the Desert View VPC with their packet so they are aware of the discussion that took
place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1070
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations, with a modification to
Stipulation No. 1, regarding an updated development
narrative
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Z-TA-5-18-2, Item #5 – Z-75-18-2, and
Item #6 – GPA-DSTV-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1071
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1072
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1073
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Daniel Tome made a motion to approve Z-62-18-2,
subject to stipulations and a modification to Stipulation No. 1, regarding an updated
development narrative. The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Shannon Simon.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
The VPC recommended approval with modification. Per the recommendation, the
stipulations for the case are as follows.
Recommended Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022, as
modified by the following stipulations:
a. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1074
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by
the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
7. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1075
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Approval, with modifications and additional stipulations
VPC Vote 10-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1076
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1077
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1078
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1079
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – Z-62-18-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion for approval with modifications to Stipulation 1,
regarding an updated development narrative, and the following additional stipulations:
1. Modify the Verdin PUD document as necessary to reflect a maximum overall
unit count of 1,250 units and a maximum overall density of 2.6 units per acre.
2. Modify the Verdin PUD document as necessary to remove the Small Lot
(SFR-3) Land Use District.
3. A minimum 25-foot open space tract shall be provided along the eastern
boundary of the Verdin property to provide a transition to the Cave Creek
Wash corridor. The open space tract shall be considered a Certified Area
Type “B” – Natural Revegetated Area with plant materials from the Verdin
PUD Plant List: Green List.
4. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department to provide public trail access easement for the Mesquite Wash
Corridor Trail and Community Paseo Paths that provide connection to the
Sonoran Preserve as depicted in Exhibit 6, Pedestrian Circulation Plan, in the
PUD document. The public access shall be designed to restrict unauthorized
motor vehicle access, as approved by the parks and recreation department.
The location and design of trail connections shall be coordinated with the City
of Phoenix.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1080
5. A minimum 12-foot wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be constructed within an
average 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the Mesquite
Wash in accordance with Section 429 of the City of Phoenix MAG
Supplemental Details, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
Committee Member Warren seconded the motion.
VOTE
10-1, the motion for approval with modifications and additional stipulations passed;
Members Dean, Hankins, Israel, Kollar, Nowell, Reynolds, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave,
and Bowser in favor; Member Powell against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
The VPC recommended approval with modifications and additional stipulations. Per
that recommendation, the stipulations for the case are as follows:
Recommended Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022, as
modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY TO
PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR.
THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A CERTIFIED
AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA WITH PLANT
MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST: GREEN LIST.
d. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by
the approved study.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1081
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS
SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE
ACCESS, AS APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL CONNECTIONS
SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAILS,
AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
9. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
10. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1082
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
Verdin PUD
April 26, 2022
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date May 5, 2022
Request From S-1 DCOD (Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert
Character Overlay District) (144.82 acres), S-1
(Ranch or Farm Residence) (333.57 acres),
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character Overlay District)
(10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (Planned Unit
Development, Desert Character Overlay
District, pending Planned Unit Development)
(155.06 acres), PUD (Planned Unit
Development) (333.57 acres)
Proposed Use Planned Unit Development to allow single-
family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Owner MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations
The purpose of this addendum is to revise the staff recommended stipulations, as
requested by the applicant:
• Modification to the maximum number of dwelling units and addition of that
number to the development standards,
• Modifications to the height of primary ornamental entry signs,
• Modifications to the plant palette,
• Addition of public trail access easements for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail
and Community Paseo Paths,
• Requirement for a trail and easement along the Mesquite Wash,
• Addition of a 25-foot-wide open space tract along the eastern boundary of the
property,
Page 1083
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
• Dedication of 16 acres at the southeast corner of the property to the City of
Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department.
Additionally, this addendum provides community correspondence received since the
staff report was published.
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended approval with modifications by a 4-1 vote. The modifications
included revisions to the development name and date stamp in Stipulation No. 1.
During the meeting, discussion occurred regarding the proposal – both support and
concerns – such as compatibility with standards outlined in the Desert Character
Overlay District, density, and guidelines for a development adjacent to the Sonoran
Preserve. Since this meeting, Taylor Morrison has worked with the community to revise
standards in the Development Narrative.
The Desert View VPC heard this request on April 5, 2022, and recommended approval
with modifications and additional stipulations by a 10-1 vote. The modifications included
the following:
• Revisions to the development name and date stamp in Stipulation No. 1,
The additional VPC recommended stipulations included the following:
• Modifications to reflect a maximum overall unit count of 1,250 units and a
maximum overall density of 2.6 units per acre,
• Removal of the Small Lot (SFR-3) land use district,
• Addition of a minimum 25-foot-wide open space tract along the eastern boundary
of the property,
• Addition of public trail access easements for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail
and Community Paseo Paths,
• Requirement for a trail and easement along the Mesquite Wash.
During the meeting, discussion occurred regarding the proposal, specifically noting
protection of Cave Creek Wash, additional housing product, retention of the Desert
Character Overlay District, groundwater issues, and sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Dwelling Units
The applicant has requested to decrease the maximum number of units for the proposal
from 1,420 to 1,250 dwelling units, thus changing the overall density from 3.0 to 2.6
dwelling units per acre. Therefore, staff is recommending that Stipulation Nos. 1.a and
1.b require the maximum unit count and overall density to be updated throughout the
Development Narrative.
Additionally, the dwelling units and development parcel allocation are outlined in Section
4, Regulatory Standards and Land Use Districts, of the Development Narrative.
Stipulation Nos. 1.i and 1.j require the maximum unit count and a footnote referencing
the development parcel allocation table be added to the Single-Family Land Use District
Development Standards table.
Page 1084
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
Land Use Districts
The proposal utilizes land use districts as an alternative to traditional zoning districts.
Each land use district regulates the product type and development standards. After
discussions with the community and VPC, the applicant decided to remove the Single-
Family Residential – Small Lot (SFR-3) district and focus on districts with larger lots.
The SFR-3 district would have accommodated attached and detached single-family
dwellings on minimum 3,000 square foot lots and had the highest density attainable in
the development. Stipulation No. 1.c requires any references to the SFR-3 district to be
removed from the Development Narrative and the applicant will update unit counts and
percentages accordingly.
Signage
The applicant had clarified that the maximum lettering and copy height for the Primary
Ornamental Entry signs is 16 feet to accommodate grading issues and being directly
adjacent to Sonoran Desert Drive, a major arterial that will have a total of 6 lanes in the
future. Stipulation Nos. 1.k and 1.s ensure that the correct height is formalized in the
Development Narrative.
Plant Palette
The Development Narrative contains a plant palette that lists desert plants typically
found in the Sonoran Desert of north Phoenix. The green list includes desert plants
allowed within all areas of the PUD, as well as open space and common areas
immediately adjacent to the edges of the subject site. The yellow list includes Sonoran
Desert native and non-native plants that are representative of southwestern deserts.
The yellow list plants may be used within all areas of the PUD, except for open spaces
and common areas immediately adjacent to the edges of the subject site.
The applicant clarified two modifications to the proposed plant palette: removal of
“Chilopsis Linearis – Desert Willow” from the green list and addition to the yellow list
and removal of “Celtis Reticulata – Netleaf Hackberry” from the yellow list and addition
to the green list. Stipulation Nos. 1.m, 1.n, 1.q, and 1.r formalize the changes to the
plant palette.
The applicant has collaborated with the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) to determine
an appropriate plant palette for the development and the NWF has approved the plant
palette. Stipulation No. 1.e to removes the word “approved” from any refences to the
plant palette. This change will avoid confusion since the plant palette has not been
approved by the City’s Landscape Architect.
Trails, Easements, and Open Space
The development will have a public trail (Mesquite Wash Trail) developed along the
Mesquite Wash Corridor. The Mesquite Wash Trail will be a 12-foot-wide natural
surface multi-use public trail within a 30-foot-wide public multi-use trail easement along
Page 1085
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
the east side of the wash. Stipulation No. 7 formalizes the requirement and ensures
that the trail is accessible to the public and built to Maricopa Association of
Governments (MAG) standards. Additionally, Stipulation No. 1.d ensures that the width
of the multi-use trail easement is revised to 30-feet-wide throughout the Development
Narrative.
After the North Gateway VPC meeting, the applicant negotiated additional modifications
regarding easements and open space along the east side of the site with a member of
the City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Mountain Parks/Preserve Committee.
Public trail access easements will be provided for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail and
Community Paseo Paths that provide connections to the Sonoran Preserve, as depicted
on the Pedestrian Circulation Plan. These easements will ensure public access to the
Preserve and restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access through the subject site to the
Sonoran Preserve. Additionally, determination of the location and design elements of
the trail connections will be coordinated with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department. Stipulation Nos. 1.g and 1.l formalize these changed in the Development
Narrative. Additionally, Stipulation No. 6 ensures that the trail is accessible to the public
as discussed in the Development Narrative.
The applicant also proposes a minimum 25-foot open space tract along the eastern
boundary of the subject site to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor.
Additionally, the open space tract will be considered a Certified Area Type “B” – Natural
Revegetated Area which will include plant materials from the Plant Palette: Green List.
Stipulation No. 1.p ensure that the open space tract is discussed in the section of the
Development Narrative regarding the Certified Area Type “B”. Stipulation No. 1.o
updates the Certified Area Open Space Types exhibit to show the 25-foot open space
tract.
The applicant also indicated that they are willing to dedicate approximately 16 acres at
the southeast corner of the development to the City’s Parks and Recreation Department
for inclusion into the Sonoran Preserve. Stipulation No. 1.f ensures that language will
be added to the Development Narrative discussing the dedication and Stipulation No. 8
requires the applicant to continue working with the Parks and Recreation Department to
formalize the dedication.
Proposition 207 Waiver
Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in Value
of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by the rezoning
application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require the form be
completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 12.
Page 1086
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
Community Correspondence
Since the staff report was published, staff has received 37 items of correspondence.
The correspondence is attached to this addendum.
Stipulations
Staff recommends approval per the modified stipulations below:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with
the Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022,
as modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES
6, 8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
DENSITY TO 2.6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6,
8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
NUMBER OF UNITS TO 1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY TO
PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR.
THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A CERTIFIED
AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA WITH PLANT
MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST: GREEN LIST.
PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, AND 136: REMOVE
ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL –
SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT COUNTS AND
PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL SHALL BE
UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO
THE WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED
PLANT PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
Page 1087
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123,
SECTION 9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD
LANGUAGE REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16
ACRES ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A
PROVISION FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE
DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN
SPACE.
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO
PATHS, PER STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL
SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL
ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
h Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
d. and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT
DENSITY THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS
FOR THE ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT
REFERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN
SECTION 4.C. (REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE
DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM
UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT
PROHIBITED BY CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY
ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE
ALLOWED…”
l. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC
TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE
THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT
PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR
VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO
THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
Page 1088
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
m. PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS –
DESERT WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO
THE YELLOW LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
n. PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND
ADD IT TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
o. PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT.
UPDATE THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE
TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” –
NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA.
p. PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. EXPLAIN
THAT THE AREA’S PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT
PALETTE GREEN LIST.
q. PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
AND INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON
PAGE 121.
r. PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
INFORMATION REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF
HACKBERRY” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST
ON PAGE 119.
s. PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM
HEIGHT FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING
AND COPY IS 16 FEET…”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by
the approved study.
Page 1089
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT
NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED
BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL
DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS
AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE
EROSION HAZARD SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH
CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION
IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH
TIMING OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON
Page 1090
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
BY THE DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT,
AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
9. Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.
Exhibits
Community Correspondence (75 pages)
Verdin PUD Development Narrative date stamped March 3, 2022
Page 1091
From: Don Bessler
To: Julianna Pierre; Joshua Bednarek
Subject: Verdin
Date: Thursday, March 10, 2022 8:12:11 PM
Hello I am a Phoenix resident in the area and I am also a small business owner of a consulting
company P3
from Donald Bessler to Host (privately): 7:22 PM
Systems Management. P3 is the nexus of People - Planet-Profit. P3 understands that
generational solutions reside in understanding the reality of the codependency of these three
perspectives. In my career, I have been responsible for developing critical habitat
management programs including Sonoran Desert Preservation plans, Urban Forestry Plans,
Sustainability Plans and Resiliency Planning. In reviewing the proposal and listening to the
presentations, the consultants and developers have thoughtfully considered the place and the
surroundings. My wife and I are avid users of the trails in the preserve, Sidewinder trail,
Ocotillo.... We have always believed that the area under discussion would become housing;
frankly, as parents of a young man, graduate of ASU and gainfully employed , we are
heartbroken by the reality he faces with home ownership due to a high demand and short
supply. While this product isn't likely to be first home ownership, the domino effect of
residents moving up will free up the housing stock for newer buyers.
from Donald Bessler to Host (privately): 7:22 PM
I want to enter my support for the project.
from Joshua Bednarek to Donald Bessler (privately): 7:28 PM
Thank you, Donald. Would it be possible to send your comments to Julianna Pierre at
julianna.pierre@phoenix.gov? That way we could have your comments for the record.
from Donald Bessler to Host & Presenter: 8:04 PM
please enter my previous comments into the record
--
Donald Bessler, PWLF
President
Page 1092
Page 1093
Page 1094
Page 1095
Page 1096
Page 1097
From: Wiele, Larry
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: North Village Planning Committee Comment
Date: Thursday, March 10, 2022 2:53:36 PM
Julianna
I now understand that these comments were due 48 hours prior to the meeting.
While this comment may not become part of the record, I still would like to express my opinion that
while we may not be able to prevent development on private land adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
the Village Planning Committee and the City of Phoenix can and should maintain strict Planning
Guidelines and insist that developers of land within the City of Phoenix follow the planning
guidelines that were established to maintain the desert characteristics and minimize the impacts on
our natural resources.
Thanks
Larry Wiele
2413 W Horsetail Trail
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Page 1098
From: Vashti Supplee
To: Julianna Pierre; Jarod Rogers
Subject: Verdin Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-62-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and GPA-DSTV-1-18- 2)
Date: Friday, March 11, 2022 10:05:55 AM
Hello Julianna- I listened to the presentations at the Gateway Village Planning Committee
meeting March 10th. I have also been in conversation with Alex Stedman concerning the
public trails and edge treatments. I consider the efforts by the Verdin team to be excellent and
I agree with the Staff Recommendation with one addition.
The public access trails are a later addition and will end in a wonderful amenity to Verdin
residents and the general recreation public seeking access to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. A
stipulation should be added to the zoning that specifically designates Mesquite Wash as a
public access corridor through the Verdin project and that designated access points from the
Verdin project to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve will be maintained as public access in
cooperation with the Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department.
Phoenix Parks and Recreation may be able to provide better specific wording. The end
objective is to have the public access trails as a condition of the rezoning. I have copied Jarod
Rogers with Phoenix Parks and Recreation.
Sincerely,
Vashti (Tice) Supplee
918 W. Roosevelt Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
602-380-3722
vsupplee25@gmail.com
Page 1099
From: Adam Stranieri
To: PDD Zoning; Gregory L Harmon; Julianna Pierre
Subject: RE: emplandsd - Form Submission
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 8:14:49 AM
Hi Julianna,
Please see below for correspondence regarding Verdin and the associated cases. Please file
accordingly.
Thank you,
Adam Stranieri, Planner III
Planning & Development Department
Planning Division, Zoning Section
Office: 602-262-7142
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 2:53 PM
To: PDD Development Services
Subject: emplandsd - Form Submission
FROM : Mandy R Fellows
SUBJECT : Verdin Development, Case #'s Z-62-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-TA-5-18, Z75-
18-2
MESSAGE : Hello,
Taylor-Morrison (TM) would have you believe the Desert Character Overlay Sub-Districts A
and B are just "technical Clean-ups" as stated on their website.
As if the City of Phoenix didn't already spend MILLIONS in studies saying specifically how
the area should be developed. They'd like to tell you it was suppose to be amended when the
Sonoran Desert Pkwy alignment was built. If that were the case, why do they need an
amendment to change it then?
Its not a matter of being against development - its a matter of following the rules already set in
place by many years and many dollars used to study this area!
Taylor- Morrison needs to revise their PUD to be in alignment with the Overlays and current
Zoning ordinances, not the other way around! Its going to cost the City millions to run the
infrastructure needed for this development, not to mention DESTROYING miles and miles of
Preserve for this leap-frog development.
TM will tell you that the proposed density of 1,420 in the middle of the desert, a leap-frog
Page 1100
development at that, can only be profitable with those numbers......then clearly they are the
ones trying to fool you. With current housing sales and prices, a developer such as Toll
Brothers would absolutely have no problem developing 1-2 units per acre, selling them at
1.5M and turning a nice profit.
I'm sure this letter will fall on deep pockets and deaf-ears, as we have all been conditioned by
these mega-corporations to only care about profits.
However, the Planning and Developments DUTY is to uphold the years and years of studies,
decisions, and plans that are in place for this area!
In addition, due to the exact location between to major washes and floodplains, I formally
request that FEMA due a study regarding the amount of fill dirt that will be removed and
impacting the designated flood areas. I hope the Planning and Development doesn't put undo
lives in the middle of tragedy when those two low lying bridges get washed out and the
residents have no way to escape, seeing as their access roads are between the two bridges!
Again - lets not talk Units until we've talked about Lives!
Thank you for your attention,
Mandy Fellows
Phoenix Resident since 1991
Email : mandy.fellows12@yahoo.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 6023093226
ADDRESS : 1615 W. Blue Sky Dr.
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85085
Submission ID: 31686fa92d944f1386ba53a11879a0ec
Form Submission On : 3/14/2022 2:52:30 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/pdd
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1101
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 10:07:47 AM
Please add to the public record
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 at 4:45 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Rob Nash-Boulden
SUBJECT : Verdin Rezoning
MESSAGE : Councilman Waring,
I appreciate that you meet your constituents in your district and had the pleasure of meeting
you F2F (at my door) a couple years ago. As you are aware, the Taylor Morrison Verdin
(McEwen 480) rezoning recently received staff approval from the Desert Village Planning
Commission - with stipulations. As a resident of Tatum Ranch since 2005 and of North
Phoenix since 1977, I know that this area will and can be developed. What I don't understand
is why the portion of the property in the Desert Overlay Character District Area A should be
rezoned to allow additional density near the Cave Creek Wash corridor on the upper 1/3 of
their property. This developer has made some great improvements to their plan since I first
viewed it a couple of years ago and has an amazing rezoning attorney making their case.
Watching and providing constructive input at the DVPC meetings these past couple of years, I
have watched with awe as Susan Demming has been able to create consensus among the
committee by removing walls, tweaking some landscaping elements, adding a butterfly
garden, and consulting with wildlife associations. Creation of walking paths, connectors to
future developments, and paying toward future intersection improvements are all appreciated
but really table stake gestures.
With all the feel-good items, momentum, and rock-star legal representation TM has, it will
take a lot of leadership to reverse this trend and say "enough"!
This property should be developed with the zoning that is in place to preserve the Desert
Character Overlay District and maintain the densities as planned for this part of their parcel.
This rezoning to 2-5 homes per acre along with the Developer's statement that they will have
attached single family, multi-story, and lots as small as 3000 SF. While the averages on their
whole property won't be terrible, there will be some pretty dense development that just doesn't
align with the zoning or the character of the area.
When I think about this property as a first (or second counting Sonoran Gate) in the area, I
worry that this rezoning creates a precedent that can later be used to apply to the other State
Land properties along this corridor. This property is also very much an "island" today. While
it will likely eventually connect to other developments, the connections from that development
today to the State Land will be a web of spider trails and open borders. Inevitably, citizens are
going to cross at Mesquite Wash and Paseo trying to get to the Apache Wash trailhead area.
Page 1102
Motorized vehicles are more likely to use this as a place to access the flood control areas and
other areas given the open borders of the planned Verdin community. I can easily see where
posted "no trespassing / State Land" signs are disregarded, and the adjacent flora and fauna
destroyed. We cannot prevent this damage to the desert but having fewer homes will help.
Those that zoned this area knew development would come and gave us a playbook for how it
should look. Maintaining the zoning on the upper portion will send the right message to the
future development plans and prevent those who by right will look for up to 5 homes per acre
while protecting the Cave Creek Wash area that was so thoughtfully included in the Desert
Character Overlay District.
I urge you to please consider this input when you are asked to vote on this request.
Regards,
Rob
Email : rob@totalitsolutions.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 722-2677
ADDRESS : 29210 N 50th Place
CITY : Cave Creek
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85331
Submission ID: 1be06d2c527d4b55a11dd07846afa465
Form Submission On : 3/14/2022 4:45:17 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1103
Page 1104
Page 1105
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 8:49:34 AM
Please add to the public record
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 8:47 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Camille proietti
SUBJECT : development Verdin community in N Phoenix near Sonoran Desert Preserve
MESSAGE : If you are at all interested in what your constituents consider important in their
lives, you will pay special attention to the plans for Verdin in N Phoenix. There is absolutely
no excuse to be building/changing the desert character overlay. There are millions of acres
available that would not disrupt such a beautiful area in N Phoenix. Again, there is NO
EXCUSE. It has been shown over and over again, that where cities categorically enhance
resident life with access to nature trails and recreational areas, are considered one of the key
criteria for high desirability. So continuing to take these areas and developing without keeping
this in mind will make Phoenix a LESS DESIRABLE area to live in. And oh, BTW, water,
water, water. Just keep building, because Arizona (specifically Phoenix) has unlimited water
supply.
Email : camillepro1006@aol.com
AREA : 845
PHONE : 6299139
ADDRESS : 29322 N 24 Lane
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85085
Submission ID: 353024d685f34e8a8e0d6e5261dd6c14
Form Submission On : 3/16/2022 8:47:31 AM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1106
From: Cynthia Weiss
To: Jim Waring; council.district2@phoenix.gov
Cc: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Message of support - Verdin Development
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 6:11:19 PM
Attachments: PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Councilman Waring,
As you know, I live in Sonoran Gate, the closest community to the proposed Verdin development that is
currently under review and consideration. Ron and I have lived in this area of North Phoenix over 25 years.
Our family knows all the trails of both North and South Preserves as we are avid hikers and mountain
bikers. We were hiking and biking the primitive trails long before Sonoran Desert Drive was built, and
before much of the land was purchased and preserved by the City of Phoenix.
I must admit when my own community, Sonoran Gate began to form on the desert floor between the North
and South Sonoran Preserves (see below), I was certainly not a fan. I would watch from the top of
Ridgeback on one of my favorite hikes as Sonoran Gate started to take shape, week by week… and again, I
was not happy with what was happening to this pristine pocket of North Phoenix.
Sonoran Gate from Ridgeback mountain, May 21, 2016
Then one evening in 2018, I will never forget, I was scheduled to meet a friend at the Apache Wash
Trailhead for a hike. When I called her to confirm, she told me, “We’re not hiking tonight, come meet me at
the models by the trailhead.”
And so I did. I went home that night with three words for my husband… “Honey, we’re moving.” And that
was it. We’ve been living in Sonoran Gate going on 4 years and we could not be happier.
Once I saw the community of Sonoran Gate with my own two eyes, I changed from a person angry about
the project to one that was eager to volunteer to live in what I consider to be one of the most beautiful
places on Earth. We are truly blessed to be living in Sonoran Gate, and blessed by the people with the vision
and talent that have made that possible.
I appreciate all the planning and civil engineering that allows me to live where I do. I appreciate all my
neighbors in Sonoran Gate, even the scorpions, coyotes and rattlesnakes.
I support this rezoning and the Verdin project beause I can clearly see the thought and care that has gone
into it. I believe there are other families like ours that dream of living within walking distance of hundreds
of miles of preserved hiking and biking trails. The Verdin project will help make that happen for hundreds
of families who call Phoenix home.
If forced to stay at the current “one dwelling per acre zoning,” any home built will be considered estate-
sized and thus only available to the extremely wealthy and/or retired, thus blocking young families with
children from living in the area. That would be a tragedy. To put a little dig on our neighbor city, that would
be “SO North Scottsdale.”
It would be difficult for anyone to thank Taylor Morrison and their team for wanting to develop these 480
Page 1107
acres. Any development in the area will mark a time of change many of us are not ready to accept, just as I
was not ready to accept Sonoran Gate as it was being developed.
I do want to thank the City of Phoenix for saving the Sonoran North and South Preserves in the first place.
Things could look much different in the area today, and public access to the now preserved areas would be
much different had poor decisions been made decades ago.
I will thank Taylor Morrison and their team for the thoughtfulness of this plan, especially for NOT
proposing a golf course in this environmentally sensitive area.
Thanks, Councilman Waring, for considering a plan that includes families, children the environment and
community. It’s a good plan, and a uniquely Phoenix plan we can stand behind.
Sincerely,
Cynthia Weiss
Page 1108
Page 1109
Page 1110
Page 1111
Page 1112
From: Don Bessler
To: Jim Waring; Julianna Pierre; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin Development
Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 10:44:05 AM
Hello;
I am a resident of Phoenix and live in your Council District near the area currently under
consideration for development "Verdin" (for a Taylor Morrison Community. I am the
President of a firm P3 Systems Management which was created to help entities find the sweet
spot between People - Profit - Planet. In addition, I spent my entire professional
career working for municipalities as a Parks and Public Works Professional. In those roles I
was responsible for the stewardship of significant city infrastructure systems and public
property including sensitive Sonoran habitat. I am familiar with community General Plans,
Resource Management Plans, including programs like Urban forestry Programs, Urban Heat
Planning, Resiliency & Sustainability planning and programming. My wife and I use the
Phoenix Preserve often, including Apache Wash and Sidewinder Trail area. I have seen the
Planning signage up for several years and we assumed that it would become housing.
I wanted to register my support for the project that is being proposed. Given my professional
background, you might imagine that I have seen hundreds of development proposals over my
many years of service; the amount of care and thoughtfulness that has been brought to bear by
the developer and property owner is vastly superior to many that I have seen. Their
understanding of the place and context is solid, their desire to work collaboratively, beyond
meeting minimum requirements is exceptional. As parents of a young working professional,
(graduate of ASU) we are disheartened by the lack of housing ownership options that are
available for first time home buyers. Adding to the housing mix, with reasonable density
residential will only help his prospects. Cities and communities that truly understand
conservation should accept density within scale; environmentally, it certainly beats the
alternative. We are seeing an exodus of our finest and brightest leaving the valley to
communities that have better housing options. I believe that this will become even more
evident over time as remote working becomes a staple of our economic future. Again, as
parents and residents, this would be the worst for us. Being able to live where you grew up
should be a practical option for our young people.
Thank you for taking the time to consider my viewpoint.
Sincerely
don
Donald Bessler, PWLF
President
Page 1113
From: Leigh Penny
To: Jim Waring; Council District 2 PCC; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin Project
Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 10:42:46 AM
I am a resident of the North Phoenix area and regularly use and benefit from the Sonoran
Preserve. I support the Verdin project. It’s my understanding that the Verdin property is
private property and has been planned for residential development for decades. Although it’s
not part of the City of Phoenix preserve area, the developers have gone to significant lengths
to make sure that Verdin fits in with the surrounding desert context. I support the developer’s
plans for preservation of washes, wildlife corridors and natural open space area. I am excited
by the public trails that will be created and which are a benefit to the entire community. I also
appreciate the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife Federation. The desert is a
beautiful place, and this thoughtful development will allow private property to be developed,
but is also sensitive to its surroundings. Thank you!
Leigh Penny
Page 1114
From: Kara Nicholls
To: Jim Waring; Julianna Pierre; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin Rezoning Request
Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 11:26:38 AM
To whom it may concern -
I am writing to show my support for the Taylor Morrison project Verdin. After attending the
public meeting, where I did take the opportunity to speak. I want to reaffirm my support of
the project. Not only do I live near to the north side of the preserve but I am a founding and
current board member of the Desert Foothills Mountain Bike Association (DFMBA) and the
founder of the Cactus Shadows High School Mountain Bike Team. My family has been using
the trails where the preserve is today for over 15 years. The preserve has also been critical to
our efforts to "get more kids on bikes." It is no surprise that one of the things the kids like is
an occasional glimpse of the wildlife whether it be a rattlesnake, a tarantula, a gila monster or
a fox.
As a director of DFMBA, my family has spent countless hours working with the land
managers to ensure access, perform appropriate trail maintenance and educate the mountain
bike community about trail courtesy.
My commitment to preserving open space for the public benefit is shown through my long
commitment and the hands-on work I have done.
However as important as open space is to our community, I am concerned about the lack of
housing available in Maricopa County. As the county rapidly expands it is important for the
government to support available housing by allowing for that housing to be built. It is no
secret that our supply of housing does not meet the demand causing the price of both rents and
housing to become less and less affordable. Local real estate economists, The Cromford
Report and Elliot Pollack, cite lack of Housing as being a key driver in the fast pace of rising
housing prices. Maintaining the zoning to 1 acre per dwelling will not do enough to provide
the area with adequate housing. While I understand this development alone will not alleviate
the housing shortfall on its own, the City of Phoenix has a responsibility to balance the current
need for housing with this minor requests for rezoning to a somewhat higher density.
I understand and support the need to preserve the natural habitat and corridors for wildlife. I
want that for the community and my own friends and family. I believe Taylor Morrsion has
thoughtfully planned the community to allow for both the community to exist alongside the
preserve and wildlife corridors. I am very excited to access the south side of the preserve from
a connected trail with the north.
Sincerely,
--
Kara Nicholls
480 246 1605
Page 1115
From: S. Altieri
To: Jim Waring; Council District 2 PCC; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin Development
Date: Thursday, March 24, 2022 10:43:41 AM
Dear Jim Waring and Julianna Pierre,
As a Desert Peak resident, I have researched the proposed, single-family, master-planned
community, Verdin, and am providing a statement of support.
We have resided in the Desert Peak community since 2018. The primary reason we selected this
community is its proximity to the Apache Wash Trailhead and other recreational areas that are
within a short drive from home. We use the trails most weekends, volunteer as City of Phoenix Park
Stewards, and we have become loyal customers of the businesses that require traveling to and
through the scenic areas that surround Desert Peak, allowing us to enjoy a beautiful, desert drive
while running errands. We could not imagine living in any other community in the Phoenix
Metropolitan Area…until we learned about Verdin.
The area surrounding Desert Peak has changed dramatically since 2018, and with the rapid and
ongoing population growth and increasing number of employment opportunities nearby, there is a
need to offer housing options to support the growth. For the Valley to continue to be a destination
for homeowners and employers, challenges with limited housing options will need to be addressed.
When we moved to the area, we recognized that changes would occur. Verdin will not only lend to
providing housing options, but as a homeowner to future communities that will become neighbors
to Desert Peak, I welcome a neighboring development like Verdin that celebrates the characteristics
of the desert environment. Verdin intends to integrate public trail corridors, view corridors, paseos
and edge open area spaces. The approach to the development incorporates sensitivity to the native
plants, wildlife, landforms and climate. Over seven miles of community paths and trails will
encourage community members and visitors to enjoy the outdoors and cherish the desert
environment as part of their daily lives. Plans for the development also include following design
guidelines for Verdin to become a National Wildlife Federation Certified Community. As an individual
with heightened interest in wildlife protection, this is among the most admirable of the features of
Verdin.
Although we love our Desert Peak community and have no intentions of moving, as homeowners,
we are now envisioning a future community that aligns precisely with the values that we uphold.
Verdin celebrates all that we appreciate about the area and look forward to seeing this development
progress to completion.
Warm Regards,
Sara Altieri
Page 1116
From: David George
To: Jim Waring; Council District 2 PCC; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 11:47:29 AM
Please accept this letter as a statement of support for Taylor Morrison’s Verdin project along
Sonoran Desert Drive.
I live in the Sonoran Gate community, which was also built by Taylor Morrison and is the closest
residential subdivision to the Verdin project. I have met with the development team to learn about
the project. I welcome another Taylor Morrison community to the area as I have enjoyed my home
and community. Additionally, although Taylor Morrison is proposing additional homes in the area,
they are also proposing significant roadway investments that benefit the larger community.
I would like to see the Verdin project approved as I know from personal experience the quality that
Taylor Morrison will bring with this development and the associated roadway improvements. Please
distributed this email to the members of the North Gateway Village and Desert View Village.
Thank you,
David George
31311 N 1st Place
Phoenix AZ 85085
Electronic File Disclaimer: This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged and
confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this
correspondence in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and permanently
delete this message and any attachments from your computer.
Page 1117
Page 1118
From: Jane penny
To: Julianna Pierre; Council District 2 PCC; Jim Waring
Subject: Verdin project
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 10:40:13 AM
We are writing this letter to voice our support for the new Taylor Morrison project on Sonoran Parkway.
We live in the Sonoran Gate Community, also built by Taylor Morrison and the closest subdivision to the Verdin
project. We love our home and our community, and we are impressed with the thoughtful treatment of the desert
surroundings. After looking at the proposed project we feel Verdin will set the bar for any future development in
our beautiful desert.
Bill and Jane Penny
Sent from my iPad
Page 1119
From: Vashti Supplee
To: Steve Bowser; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin Project
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 10:08:07 AM
Hello Steve and Julianna-
I am writing as myself and I am not representing any entity. I have been keenly interested in
public trail connectivity for the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve north and south of Sonoran Desert
Parkway. I have had the opportunity to meet with Alex Stedman, planner for the Verdin
project. I made some suggestions to improve the project in terms of edge protections on the
east adjacent to Cave Creek Wash and public access. The Verdin team has largely adopted
these suggestions
I am unable to attend the upcoming Village Planning meeting on April 4th and I have the
following comments for the record.
The Verdin project team has been very responsive to suggestions that will contribute to the
desert character of the development, including a 25 foot natural area buffer on the east edge of
the property adjacent to Cave Creek. There will be public access along Mesquite Wash and
through the pedestrian Paseos to Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation Area
land.
I support the following stipulations as part of PUD approval:
STIP #1: Public trail access easements, as approved by the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department, shall be provided for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail, and the Community Paseo
Paths that provide a connection to future trail connections to the Sonoran Preserve as identified
on the Verdin Pedestrian Circulation plan dated June 3, 2019 included within the Verdin PUD, to
ensure permanent public access through the Verdin community to the Sonoran Preserve. The
public access shall be designed in a way to restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access, as
approved by Parks. The specific location, design and timing of construction of the public trail
connections shall be coordinated with and approved by the Parks and Recreation Department.
STIP #2: A minimum 25 foot open space tract shall be provided along the eastern boundary of
the Verdin property to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor. The open space
tract shall be considered a Certified Area Type “B” – Natural Revegetated Area with plant
material from the Approved Plant List: Green List.
Yours in Conservation,
Vashti "Tice" Supplee
918 W. Roosevelt Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
vsupplee25@gmail.com
Page 1120
Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: April 5 Desert View Village Planning Committee
From:Wiele,Larry
Sent:Thursday,March31,20222:38PM
To:AnthonyMGrande
Subject:April5DesertViewVillagePlanningCommittee
Anthony
IamaresidentoftheSonoranFoothillsdevelopment,locatedjusttothewestoftheareathatisbeingproposedfor
rezoningandchangestotherequirementsthatwouldberequiredfordevelopment.
WhileIunderstandthatthisareaisprivatelyowned,andissubjecttodevelopment,Iwanttoencourageyoutonot
changethezoningrequirementsorreducethedesertcharacterthathasbeenintendedforthisarea.These
requirementshavebeeninplaceformanyyears,andtheownersofthelandhavebeenawareofthese
requirements.Theserequirementsareforthegoodofthecommunityasthewhole,whilereducingtheserequirements
benefitsonlytheownersofthisland,andinfactincreasingthenumberofhomesinthisareawillhaveanegativeimpact
onthecurrentresidentsinthisarea.
IrequesttheDesertViewPlanningCommitteemembersvoteagainsttheitemsontheApril5PlanningCommittee
Agenda.
LarryWiele
2413WHorsetailTrail
Phoenix,AZ85085
Page 1121
From: James G. Gaston II
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com; Joshua Bednarek; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin/McEwan 480 Project
Date: Friday, April 1, 2022 2:47:24 PM
As a local resident, I am against any realignment/zoning amendment of Phoenix’s Master Plan
for the Sonoran Preserve as it relates to Taylor Morrison’s request for the Verdin/McEwan 480
Project, Z-62-18-2. Key objection elements of the amendment include:
1. Remove the Desert Character Overlay requirement
2. Build homes outside of existing infrastructure
3. Massive up zone, 3–5 houses per acre
The developer is seeking to transform the Desert Character Overlay around the Preserve.
Moving it north of Sonoran Desert Drive is actually removing it because north of Sonoran
Desert Drive is the Preserve itself.
Regardless of previous statements, if all Plan Amendments proposed are passed, the
development will not be “truly unique.” Nor will it be as the developer committed, “ . . . a
context-sensitive community that sets the bar high for any future development in the area.”
It seems all the developer sees is growth, not thoughtful development, or sustainability. This
Plan Amendment only benefits the developer and not the community or the Preserve.
I am not a “recreational activist,” as cited on a recent local newscast. My objections seek to:
a. Maintain the Master Plan as originally proposed
b. Recognize the dismal condition of the Valley’s current and future water supply
c. Maintain the overlay as the effective way to control development in the entire Preserve
area
James Gaston
Cave Creek, Arizona
Page 1122
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Taylor Morrison Development North Gateway, Sonoran Preserve
Date: Friday, April 1, 2022 5:19:55 PM
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
-----Original Message-----
From: Jill Hoffman
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 4:55 PM
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: Council District 2 PCC; Mayor Gallego
Subject: Taylor Morrison Development North Gateway, Sonoran Preserve
I was saddened to hear of the committee vote of 4-1 to allow all of Taylor Morrison’s requests in changing the
zoning and the North Gateway overlay previously planned. I was hoping that the density would not change, but at
the very least they would keep the desert character overlay that all the other neighborhoods in the area adhere to, per
city of Phoenix. I’m also very worried about the infrastructure in place now, will not support any more population,
not to mention the lack of schools in the area. My youngest will finish high school next year, but the overcrowding
in our schools in the North Gateway neighborhoods is horrible. We are not sending our kids to Barry Goldwater
because there is “room", and I assure you Boulder Creek does not have the room for the added population. That
school has a hard enough time getting teachers to drive so far north for the students they have now. The approval of
all things building, is not making an ideal neighborhood. The fact that 7 new apartment complexes are coming to
North Gateway, 5 of them in one area, proves you are not looking out for the interests of the current residents.
Schools and roads are not in place. These builders need to pay for the upgraded infrastructure and schools, just like
50% Norterra Canyon was paid for by the builder. Sonoran Foothills School came 8 years after promised, and has
been over capacity since the 3rd year it was open. The saddest part, is you are allowing a desert jewel you have been
entrusted with, to turn into urban sprawl. Along the I-17 corridor is where building was planned 30+ years ago, not
Phoenix’s beautiful Sonoran Preserve. We can never get it back. It takes a strong person to stand up for the land, be
that person for the generations to come.
Jill Hoffman
North Gateway resident since 2005
Page 1123
From: Christine M Pedersen
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Save Our Sonoran Preserve - Rezone Proposal
Date: Monday, April 4, 2022 3:17:08 PM
Good Afternoon Julianna,
Please see below.
Thank you,
Christine
From: Sonoran Preserve
Sent: Saturday, April 2, 2022 1:28:02 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve - Rezone Proposal
Dear Councilmember Waring,
Recently I wrote to you about a test mailing Save Our Sonoran Preserve was doing to gage public
support for retaining the Desert Character Overlay District. The mailing was made to a sampling of
400 of the nearly 12,000 voters living near the Preserve. The test area is highlighted green in the
map posted at: https://app.box.com/s/bnui5b5w5ufyqidem2mmwfg0jofh1c6f [app.box.com].
I am pleased to report that the test mailing is showing an unusually high degree of deeply felt
support for the Sonoran Preserve among nearby voters.
We mailed the letter at the following link to 400 registered voters, half of which were Republican
and half Democrat: https://app.box.com/s/3wp1f022c56vu1j566ph0kdcmcbztdh8 [app.box.com].
The mailing to 400 voters has thus far generated 118 signatures of the petition
at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve [surveymonkey.com].
A map showing the location where supporters live is
at: https://app.box.com/s/t0am8a0717ksk0o1sdalrgdc19zhlcdk [app.box.com]. As you’ll see support
is coming from voters living up to four miles from the Sonoran Preserve. And support is about equal
from Republicans and Democrats.
Nearly all of the petition signers provided the reasons for why they want the Sonoran Preserve
safeguards of the Desert Character Overlay District retained. These reasons can be viewed
at: https://app.box.com/s/405n9bnddchkl92qj29j1x1m0yx8xhun [app.box.com].
We anticipate that this test mailing will eventually result in a total of 150- to 200-petition signers.
Suffice to say, this test indicates a high degree of support among area voters for your efforts to
Page 1124
safeguard the Sonoran Preserve. I suspect though that supporters may be open to modifying the
areas in the bottom 2/3 of the Verdin property while keeping Desert Character Overlay in the top
1/3 so as to create a win-win compromise for both parties.
We are now planning a second survey mailing to 6,000 of the 12,000 nearby voters. Once we have
these results we will again share our results with you. Thank you again for working and meeting with
us this important issue.
Respectfully,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
708-369-4566
*******
Page 1125
Page 1126
SAVE OUR SONORAN PRESERVE
Dr. Gary Kirkilas, Chair (708) 369-4566
21001 N Tatum Blvd STE 1630-238 saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Phoenix, Arizona 85050 supportpubliclands.com/arizona/save-our-sonoran-preserve
March 8, 2022
«FirstName» «LastName»
«Address»
«City», Arizona «Zip»
Dear «MrMs» «LastName»:
I understand that you, like me, live in the vicinity of the Sonoran
Desert Preserve shown in the map on the other side of this letter. I
assume that you, like me, treasure living near this fantastic natural area
and the opportunities afforded for hiking, biking, or just a pleasant drive
along Sonoran Desert Drive. If this is true then please consider signing
the petition at the following address: ceds.org/sosp or scan the QR code
to the right with your phone or tablet camera then tap open
‘surveymonkey.com’. Every signature we get goes a long way.
At issue is a proposal to double or triple the number of housing units that can be built on
the Verdin site (see map). Development in this area is guided by the Desert Character Overlay
District which allows growth but with a number of measures to safeguard those Sonoran Desert
Preserve values we treasure.
The Verdin development company has asked the Phoenix City Council to ignore the
Desert Character Overlay District. If granted, Sonoran Desert Drive traffic volume could go
from 8,300- to more than 20,000-trips/day from this one development. Other potential growth
along this corridor could raise Sonoran Desert Drive traffic to nearly 50,000 trips/day or more!
Sonoran Desert Drive traffic volume is already at a point where additional bike safety
measures are needed. While there are proposals to add these measures, there is a point where
traffic volume becomes so great that cycling or just walking is no longer enjoyable.
Doubling to tripling the number of nearby homes would detract from the true wilderness
essence of the Preserve. Additionally, abandoning the Desert Character Overlay District is like
turning our back on the beloved Sonoran Preserve - eliminating the protections that were
thoughtfully placed to maintain the uniqueness and beauty as well as ensure maximum
conservation of the incredible ecosystems while allowing a reasonable amount of development.
It is for these reasons that I ask you to sign the Save Our Sonoran Preserve petition
urging Jim Waring and other Phoenix City Council members to require that Verdin and other
development fully comply with the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards.
Over, pleaseÆ
Page 1127
Please contact me at saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com or (708) 369-4566 if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas, Chair
Page 1128
Page 1129
Reasons Provided By Phoenix Residents for Why They Signed the
Save Our Sonoran Preserve Petition at:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
WeneedtodoeverythingwecantoprotecttheSonoranDesertPreserve.Thereshouldn’tbelotsofhomes
there.We’vealreadytakensomuchofthenaturalhabitatanddevelopedit.Weneedtoleavelargechunks
alonesothatthoseanimalsthatliveinthedeserthaveaplace.Ilovehavingthewildernessnearbyand
untouched.Increasingthenumberofhomesnearthepreserveisaskingfortroubleanddisplacingsomanyof
thedesertanimals.Iboughtoutheretobeclosetonaturenottobringthedowntowntraffichere.
Trafficonthepreserveroadisalreadyquitebusyduringrushhour.Addingmorehomeswillincreasethedanger
oftheroadanddamagethebeautifuldesert.
IlovedrivingontheSonoraDesertDr.andseeingourbeautifuldesert.Iandmyfamilymembersalsoenjoy
hikingandbikingonthetrails.
Ihavelivedinthisareaforover16yearsandamanativeArizonan.TheCityhasdoneawonderfuljobon
SonoranDesertDrive,intermsofincorporatingareastorecreateandenjoytheunbelievabledesertscenery
withintheSonoranPreserve.Ihavehikedtheareaandmarvelatthebeauty.Increasingtheplannedhousing
unitsbymultiplesoftwoorthreewillsignificantlydetractfromthearea'sbeautyandtranquilityandaddan
unsustainableamountoftrafficandintroduceecologicaldamagetothearea.Thereisareasonsomuchland
wasdesignatedasapreserveallthoseyearsago.Itshouldstaythatway.
ThePhoenixSonoranPreserveisoneofthefinestusesoftaxpayerdollars.Theabilitytohikeandmountainbike
onmilesandmilesoftrailsisoneofmyfavoritepartsoflivinginNorthPhoenix.Wearealreadyinundatedwith
apartmentcomplexesandhomedevelopmentswithplentyofinventory.Plus,thereisplentyoflandavailable
fordeveloperstobuildonthatwon’twreckoneofthebestthingsthattheCityofPhoenixhasdoneinthepast
coupledecades.
Theinfrastructureisnotsetupforadevelopmentofthissizeandthetaxpayersshouldn’tbearthecostto
Idrivethisroadregularlyandit’salreadygettingoverpopulatedwithtrafficwiththecurrentdevelopment.
MorehousingandconstructionwilltakeawaythenaturalbeautyoftheSonorandesertpreserveandwillalso
increaseunwantedtraffic.
Weliveinthearea,havehikedthesetrails,ourtwoboysattendednearbyCCUSDHorseshoeTrailselementary
school,andI’dsaythatingeneralwehaveastrongdesiretoactasgoodstewardsofthislandandtherefore
haveavestedinterestinmaintainingthebeautyoftheSonorandesertpreserveandourbalancewithnature.
Thiscityisgrowingsofast&weneedtopreservesomeofthebeautifuldesertlandscape.Ifwekeepbuilding
morehouses,wewillhavenothingleft.Wedon’tneedmorehouses!!
Wedonotwantthisnewdevelopmentbecausewelovethenaturaldesertwechosetolivenear.Inaddition,we
doneedtheexcessiveamountoftrafficthatsuchadevelopmentwouldcause.
AsaresidentofanearbycommunityIamconcernedthatthetrafficthatwillbegeneratedbytheproposed
Verdincommunitywillpresentmanysafetyconcerns.ThePreserveprovidesatranquilenvironmentthatwill
mostlikelychangedramaticallyincharacterifthisdenselypopulatedcommunityisbuilt.Idon’tmindsome
buildingalongtheroutebutonlyifitisnotpopulatedasdenselyassomeofthesurroundingdevelopments.
Ourhousebacksuptothedesert.Weboughtthathousebecauseitbacksuptothedesert,Iwanttotokeepour
viewandourslowersimplelifestylethereandnotturnitsintoabigcityfeel.
Wouldcauseanoverpopulatedareathatismeanttobepreservedfornature.Wouldruinhikingandbikingdoto
theamountoftrafficandwouldbecomedangerous.Wouldeffecttheviewsandtheabilityforpeopleenjoythe
scenery.Wouldalsoeffectthewildlifepushingthecoyotesandjavelinasintoresidentialareas.Whichthey
belonginthedesert.
Thiswouldcausepollutiondustnoiseandwouldbeharmfultoourhealth
Page 1130
Thereisnoneedforadditionalhousinginourareaspecificallysonearaprotectedpreserve.Thereisnotenough
watersosupporttheadditionalhomesandbusinessesthatcomewithadevelopmentsuchasthis.
Naturalbeautyalongwithreducednoise,trafficandnightlights.
WeliveintheSonoranGatecommunity.I’malsoacyclist.Wemovedheretoescapecongestionandenjoythe
outdoors.Allofthatisthreatenedwiththiscurrentbuildingfrenzy.Whywouldweabandontheexpresspurpose
ofthesePreserves,socarefullyplannedanduniquelyexecuted?!Andwherearewefindingasustainablewater
supplyforthisunbridleddevelopment?Thisismadness.
Nowantinganymorehomedelveloperstearingupthepreserves.WiththeadditionalVerizonzonesitethere
willbetomanydangerousEMF’sinthecommunity
ThebeautyoftheSonoranPreservewillbereplacedwithurbanarea????Duringthehikeorbikeridearewe
supposedtoadmirethehouses???
TjhisisthelaststripofSonoranDesertleftinPhoenix.I'msorrythepreservedoesn'tborderDoveValley.Whats
doneisgonedonotmakeitworseby3Xthenumberofpeople
Noneedformoredevelopmenteatingupourdesert.
IamveryconcernedabouttheadditionaltrafficvolumethatwillbearesultoflargeVerdincommunity.Iama
triathletewhousesSonoranDesertDr.dailyfortrainingandwiththeincreasedtrafficIfearformysafety.In
addition,wemovedtothisarea(85085)forthebeautyofthedesert.AbandoningtheDesertCharacterOverlay
Districtwilleliminatetheprotectionsthatwereplacedtoensureconservationoftheecosystemsinthearea
whilestillallowingforsomedevelopment.ThelargenumberofhomestheVerdindevelopmentcompany
proposestosqueezeintothisareawilldetractfromthewildernessandbeautyofthePreserve.Yet,another
areaofconcernwouldbetheovercrowdingofschoolsintheDeerValleySchooldistrict.
Weneedtoprotectourbeautifuldesert.Therearemanyotherareastobuildonsowecanallappreciatethe
scenery.Afterallthisiswhywelivehere.
Keepingsomesemblanceofthedesertlifestyleiswhywemovedhere.Donotignorethesafeguards.Reducethe
numberofhousingunits.Whydoyouwanttodobusinesswithacompanywhichclearlydoesnotrespect
nature,butonlytheeconomicbottomlineͲ$
Enjoybicyclingthroughthepreserve.Theroadistoonarrowforthetrafficalreadyusingtheparkway.
ThiszoningwouldbeuncharacteristicoftheSonoranpreserveandcityparksurroundingthesite.
ItravelSonoranDesertDriveeverydaybecauseIliverightoffofit.Itisabeautifuldrive,butalsoonethatis
verysereneandpeaceful.IamconcernedthatallowingtheVerdincommunitytobebuiltattherequested
densityitwillcauseagreatimpactandstresstothedrivethroughthePreserve.Eveniftheroadisexpandedto
morelanes,thisroadwillbecomeadangerousrouteforthebikersandhikersinthearea,nottomentionthe
drivers.Pleasedonotallowthedensityforthisnewcommunityasrequested!
Weneedmoreopenspaceandalreadyhaveenoughhomes!
Weselectedthisareatolive,inpart,basedonthefeelingofbeingclosertonature.TheSonoranPreserveplayed
abigpartinthatfeeling.ThelossofanyPreserveopenspaceortheincreaseintrafficthruthePreservewill
diminishthatfeeling.Pleaserequirealldeveloperstocomplywithexistingdeveloprestrictionsanddonot
"lessen"thoserestrictions.ͲThankyou...
Ihavelivedinthisareafortwentyyearsanditisgettingsocrowdedandoverbuilt.Wemustpreserveopen
outdoorspaceforpeopletoenjoythepeaceofthedesertandrecreationareasthatareourArizonatreasures
ThebeautyofthisPreserveareashouldbePRESERVED.ThereisareasonwhytheDCODexists.
Trafficcongestion,pedestrianandbicyclesafety.Preservingthisareafromdevelopment,asenvisionedbythe
DesertCharacterOverlayDistrict.
Toomuchhousingbuildout,let'sslowitdown
Toomuchhousingbuildout,needtoslowdownalittle
Iwanttoprotectthewildernessandessenceofthepreserve.Ithoughtthislandwasprotectedfromfuture
housingdevelopment
Page 1131
Thisareaisimportanttousaswehikeandbike.Knowingthatpreservewillalwaysbeheremadebuyingour
homeeasy.Wewouldlikeforalldevelopmenttomindandtakecareofourdesertspaces.Thereisareasonthe
DesertCharacterOverlayDistrictwascreated.Toignorethiswouldbeatragedy.
ItisveryimportanttoretainournaturaldesertandtheSonoranPreserve.
Wespecificallymovedtothisareab/cofthepreserveandthepeacefulnessthatitbringstoourlivesand
neighborhood.Districtguidelinesareinplaceforareasonandshouldnotbeadjustedforagreedydeveloper.
Thisismyneighborhood..Ilivehere.Ihikethesebeautifultrailsfivetimesaweek.Thereareplentyofacresof
desertinotherareas.Peoplecomefromalloverthevalleytohikeandbikehere.Thislandhasbeensetasidefor
thisandshouldnotbetakenaway.
Thegrowthinthisareaisalreadyatanalltimehigh.ThissmallareaofdesertPRESERVEiswhymanyofus
movedtothearea.ThePRESERVEisusedbyhikersandbikersasabeautifulgetawaythatisinourbackyard.
Everyotherinchhasalreadybeendevelopedbyapartmentcomplexes.Enough!!LeaveourPRESERVEalone!!
IlivearoundthecornerinSonoranFoothillscommunityandoneofthereasonswemovedherewastobeable
tobikeonDoveValleyandSonoranDesert,aswetrainforTriathlonsyearround.Everycaryouaddtothese
roadsmakesthismoredangerousforus.IhavealmostbeenhittwicebycarscomingoutofSonoranGate
community.Theproposeddevelopmentofover1400homeswilldestroythisveryspecialarea.
Trafficismymainissue.AsaSonoranbikerouteitisbecomingmoreandmoredangerousforbikers.School
trafficonmainroadsandthroughneighborhoodsalsohasbecomemoredangerous.Wildernesscanneverbe
recapturedoncehomesarebuiltsowehaveaonceinalifetimedutytosavelandforconservationandwildlife.
asathirdgenerationnativezoney,Ihaveseentoomuchofourbeautifuldesertturnedovertodevelopers.We
mustpreservetheveryassetthatdrawssomanytomovetoourwonderfulstateͲfindabetterbalancebetween
growthandpreservation.IrecentlymovedtoahomeinSonoranFoothillstoenjoythisbeautifularea.Please
donotallowthegreedofdevelopersoverbuildourdesert.
Iabsolutelylovethebeautyofthedesertandtheopportunitywehavetogetoutinthepreservetohike,run
andbike.Iamanavidtrailrunnerandhikerandwouldbedevastatedifwelosethatabilityjusttomakewayfor
morehouses.
IliveinSonoranGate.IhikeApacheTrail.
Ilovehikinginthepreserve.Anyonewhointendsonbuildinganywhereclosetoitneedstofollowtherules.
Ourdesertisatrisk.Weneedyoutoprotectitbyrequiringthebuildertodotherightthing.
Imovedherein2007tobenearthisgreatpreserveandtoliveI.Aquietcommunity.Addingthismuchhousing
developmentswillforeverimpactthisnaturalenvironment
It’simperativetopreserveandprotectthewildlifeandtheirnaturalhabitat.Thisareaisalreadyexplodingwith
growth&traffic.
Thereasonwemovedherewasthebeautyandtranquilityofthedesert.Wewerenotawareoftheproposed
‘citylike’communityVerdinwishestobuild.
TheSonoranDesertDriveisabeautifulnaturalareathatneedstobepreservedforfuturegenerations.Thereare
plentyofotherplacestodevelopclosertotheIͲ17
TheSonoranPreservealongSonoranDesertDriveallowsuscloseappreciationofthescenicdesertandits
thrivingecosystem.Otherpartsofthevalleyarebetterequippedforgrowthandinfill.Weneedtoembrace
densitywherethecityismorepreparedtosupportit.Thispatchworksprawlintotheouterreachesofthedesert
chopsuptheexpanseofhabitatunnecessarily.Ifitcontinues,wecanonlylookforwardtosmallpatchesof
desertbrushbetweenhomesasopposedtomilesofouruniquedesertthatwecanallenjoy.
Therehasbeenenoughdevelopmentinthisarea.Stopcrowdingoutthewildlife.
Thisareaneedstobepreservedasoriginallydesignedinorderforthemembersofthiscommunitytoenjoya
placetogetawayfromalltheoverdevelopment.
Page 1132
Wemoveduptothisareatoenjoythebeautyandtranquilityofthearea.Nowitisbeingthreatened.Wemoved
uptothisareatoseeourbeautifuldessertinitsnaturalhabit,andnowit'sbeingthreatened.Wemoveduphere
becauseitwasagreatdreamcometrue,andnowthatdreamisagainbeingthreatenedbythosewishingto
makemanydollarsoffthelandandenvironmentthatbelongstousall.Please,pleaselet'sstopthistravesty.
Thanksforreadingmyinput.Wejustsoloveituphereandhopefornomoregrowthanddevelopment.
WithalltheapartmentsbeingbuiltonthewestendbetweenDoveValley&SonoranDesertDrive,thetrafficwill
becomejustlikethecitystreets—noisyandcongested.Verdinproposingadditionalhomeswillmakeitthat
muchworse.Inaddition,wemovedtothisareabecauseoftheSonoronDesertPreservewhichisbecomingnon
Conservationwillprotectthewildlife.Drivingthemoutoftheirnaturalhabitatcouldputsomeanimalsatriskof
extinction.Thereareotherdesertareas/landthatcouldbebuilton.Preservingwillhelpreduceourfootprintand
helpreducetrafficandpollution.
EverywherenearSonoranpreserveanddesertdriveconstructionsarehappening,it’saverybeautifulhikeplace
toenjoyqualitytimewithfamilyandfriends,asaneighborhoodresidentIwouldliketokeepitbeautifulandnot
havehomesafterhomesgettingbuiltthere…therearehardlyanycommunityparkgettingbuiltinthearea..
Iamanavidhiker.Ienjoybeingabletoseenature,plantsandanimals.Wearealreadytakingsomuchnatural
habitatfromdesertlife.Overcrowdingthepreserveareaincreasespollutionbyhumansandtheirmachines.
Furthermore,lightandnoisepollutioncreateadditionalissues.Pleaseconserveourpreserve.
Iamanavidhiker.Ienjoybeingabletoseenature,plantsandanimals.Wearealreadytakingsomuchnatural
habitatfromdesertlife.Overcrowdingthepreserveareaincreasespollutionbyhumansandtheirmachines.
Furthermore,lightandnoisepollutioncreateadditionalissues.Pleaseconserveourpreserve.
IfrequentlyrecreateintheareaͲitisfrequentedbyalotofpeople.Bothontheroadwithlimitedtrafficandon
thetrails.ItwouldbedetrimentaltothefoundationofthePhoenixPreservestotakeawaylanddedicatedto
openspaceandlettingdeveloperstearitapart.Developerscangetlandfurtheroutontheoutskirtsoftownto
developͲnotareasalreadydedicatedasopenspaceforalltorecreatenowandfuturegenerations.
Ihikethruthepreservealmosteveryday.Itisabeautifulandpeacefulareaamidthecity.Losingthisareato
Koreahousingwouldbeawful.Thereissomuchdevelopmenteverywheresothesespecialareasarebecoming
allthemoreimportanttospareornotoverdevelop.Onceitisgoneitcannotbereplaced.Pleasedon'tletthis
wonderfulareaberuinedbymoreoverdevelopment!
Itisaverypeacefulplacetohike.Myfamilygoestherefrequently.ThebeautyofSonoranDesertDrisso
beautifulitshouldnotbedisturbed.
It’svitaltokeepthepreservenaturalanduntouchedfortheuseofhikingandsupportingoutdooractivities.
Withouttheregulationsinplacetherewouldbenopreservetouseandadmire.Theanimalsinthepreserve
wouldbegreatlyaffectedbyalargerpopulationcrowdingthem.
it'sanaturaltreasurethatisspecialandneedstobeprotected.
LivingbythebeautifulSonoranMountainPreserveareaandSonoranDesertDrive,allowspeopletointeract
positivelywithnatureandtheenvironment.Thisisnecessaryforpeople’sphysicalandmentalwellbeing,which
weallrediscoveredduringthepandemicwhenitwasoneofthefewthingspeoplewereallowedtodo.The
MountainPreserveallowspeopletoconnectwithnatureandenjoythepeacefuloutdoorenvironment.The
peopleinthearealovetheopenspacesandserenitythattheSonoranDesertMountanPreserveprovides.They
walk,bikeorhikeintheneighborhoodeveryday.Ifthesedevelopersareallowedtooverdevelopthisbeautiful
areaitwillbeadetrimenttothealreadyestablishedneighborhoodsbyincreasedpopulationthroughclustered
housing,traffic,safety,noiselevels,overcrowdedschools,andahostofotherissues.Thismountainpreserveis
vitaltothewellbeingandsafetyofpeoplewhochosetoliveforhereforabetterqualityoflife.Pleasedon’t
allowthesedeveloperstodestroytheMountainPreserve.Thankyou
Maintaindesertpreserve,congestion,qualityoflife,saferplacetoenjoydesertwithexercise.
MyfamilyandIlovehikingintheSonoranPreserve.It’showwespendourweekends.Wewouldhatetolose
anymoreoftheland,theatmosphere,theanimals.Pleasesavetheland.Thankyou
Page 1133
MyhusbandandImovedintotheareaspecificallyforthetrailsandwildernessoftheSonoranPreserve.Wehike
thetrailsatleasttwiceaweekwithourdogs.Pleasedonotallowmoreencroachmentjustforthesakeof
makingmoremoney!Iamaretiredregisterednurseandservedtheindigentpopulationsandcan'taffordto
moveagain.Pleasestopthis!
Myselfandsomanyofmyneighborsandfriendshikethisareaonaregularbasis!Thereisanestthatanowl
comesbacktoeveryyear!Therearebeautifulfeesoftheamazingareainwhichsomanyofuscallhome!Please
don’tdestroyanareaweloveandcherish
Needtopreserveasmuchofourbeautifulmountainsaspossible
OurfamilyenjoysthescenicdrivedownSonoranDesertDrive.I’msaddenedtoheartheyalreadyhaveplansto
developsomeofthatland.ThedessertlandscapeandeasyaccesstotrailsfromFiresideareuniquetolivingin
NorterraandIwouldhatetoseethatchange.It’salreadybecomingovercrowdeduphereandtrafficiseffected.
Pleaseconsiderpreservingourbeautifuldesertlandscape.
Ourwildlifeisbeingdisplacedandsoonwillnothaveaplacetolive.Peoplewantthemkilledastheyareafraidof
them!WewillliveinadenserareaanditwillsoonfeellikeNYCity!Wemustfindabalanceforall.
QualityofLifewillbedestroyed!Letusstartwithhabitatdestruction.Thenlet'sdiscussthewatershortage.
September2021,itwasreportedthattheBureauofReclamationhasdeclaredawatershortageontheColorado
River,whichmeansthatArizona,alongwithNevadaandMexico,willgetlesswaterthannormalby2022.Ifwe
continuetodestroyourdesertwithunnecessarydevelopmentforthesakeofthealmightydollarthenwemight
aswellliftallrestrictions.Whenwillitend?Whenisenoughgrowthenough?MaricopaCountywasthenumber
onecountyinthenationforgrowthinthepastyear.Thisneedstostop!Wearedestroyingourhumanhabitat
byallowingthesedeveloperstobullytheirwayintotheseareas.Nowlet'sdiscusssafety?LookatourPolice
Deptorlackthereof.Wecan'tsustainthisridiculousgrowth.Pleasedowhatyoucantohelppreserveour
beautifulSonoranPreserve!
QualityofLifewillbedestroyed!Letusstartwithhabitatdestruction.Thenlet'sdiscussthewatershortage.
September2021,itwasreportedthattheBureauofReclamationhasdeclaredawatershortageontheColorado
River,whichmeansthatArizona,alongwithNevadaandMexico,willgetlesswaterthannormalby2022.Ifwe
continuetodestroyourdesertwithunnecessarydevelopmentforthesakeofthealmightydollarthenwemight
aswellliftallrestrictions.Whenwillitend?Whenisenoughgrowthenough?MaricopaCountywasthenumber
onecountyinthenationforgrowthinthepastyear.Thisneedstostop!Wearedestroyingourhumanhabitat
byallowingthesedeveloperstobullytheirwayintotheseareas.Nowlet'sdiscusssafety?LookatourPolice
Deptorlackthereof.Wecan'tsustainthisridiculousgrowth.Pleasedowhatyoucantohelppreserveour
beautifulSonoranPreserve!
Somanyanimalswillgetdisplacedfromtherenaturalhabitats.
TheDonoranapreserveisapeacefulareausedbymanypeopleforhiking,mountainbikingandhorseback
riding.Addingmorehouseswillincreasethenumberofpeopleusingthetrailsaswellascreatemoretrafficin
ThepreservegivesushikingtrailsandallowseveryonetoenjoythebeautyoftheArizonadesertandwildlife.It
wouldalsodramaticallydecreasepropertyvaluesforthepeoplevotingforyoutoremaininoffice.
Thisareaisgreatlyusedforhiking,biking,trailrunning,andoutdoorrecreationalactivities.Wedonotwant
overdevelopmenttoruinthenaturalaesthetics,significantlyincreasenoise,orpollutionthatwoulddegradethe
valueofthetrueremainingwildernessintheSonoranDesertPreserve.Pleaseseektoenforceandupholdthe
DesertCharacterOverlayDistricttowardtheVerdinprojectandothersubsequentproposals.
Thisisabeautifulandvibrantpartofourcommunity.Don’tdestroyitbyaddingadditionalresidential
development.Oncethosehousesgetinthere,theyaregoingtobecomplainingandadvocatingforcommercial
developmentbecausetheydon’twanttodrive20minutestoshopsandrestaurants.Beforeweknowit,allof
thepreservewillbegone.Thehikingtrails,thenature,andtheareaispristine.
Page 1134
ThisisadesignatedDesertSonoranPreserve.Theestablishedtrailsareusedbythousandsandthepreserve
hostshabitatforArizonawildlifeincludingjavelina,bobcat,coyote,raccoon,groundsquirrelandmanymore.
ThereareavarietyofbirdandreptilespeciesGilaMonster,greathornedowl,roadrunner,gamblesquail,Inca
dove,Cardinals,spottedwhiptailandchuckwallalizardstomentionafew.ThisareaofPhoenixcannotbe
expandedintoalegislatedpreserve.Toomanyapartmentsintheareahasalreadyincreasedcrime,drugsand
trafficcongestion.AnyadditionalhousingandapartmentdevelopmentrequestsinthenorthPhoenixareamust
bedenied.Respectfully,BillShackelford.VotingResident
Usethatareatobikethetrails.Wanttokeepthespacenaturalbeautynotfilledwithhomes.
Wanttokeeparealowertraffic
Welovethebeautyandtranquilityofthedesert.
WelovethebeautyoftheSonoranPreserve.Pleaseprotectwhatisleftandsavethebeautyofthedessert.
Welovetohikethisbeautifularea.AlsothedrivedownSonoranparkwayisincredible.Wemustpreservethis
desertnotonlyforhumanenjoymentbutalsothewildlifethatcallithome
Weneedtokeepasmuchnatureuntouchedandbeautiful.
Weneedtopreservethebeautyofournaturalhabitats.Therearealreadyplentyofplacesthatarezonedfor
building.Pleasedonotletgreedruinourneighborhood.
WeneedtopreservethebeautyoftheSonoranPreserve.
Weneedtopreservetheopenspacesthatattractsomanytotheareaforrecreation.Thereisalotofbuildingof
highoccupancyunitsandhousingunderway.Schoolsarealreadyatcapacity,newservicesarebeingbuilton
Jomaxtoeasetheinflux,roadinfrastructureneedstobeinconsiderationto.
Whilethecontinuedexpansionofhomesandbuildingintothisareaisinevitableandneeded,themaintenance
oftheDesertCharacterOverlayisimportanttokeepthebeautyandfeelofthisarea.Theresidentswholive
heremovedhereforareason,andweappreciatetheforethoughtthatwentintotheDesertCharacterOverlay
originally.Pleasedonotabandonthis.Itwouldbeonethingifthebuilderwerebuildingreasonablypriced
homestoassistwiththeaffordablehousingshortage,buttheyarenot.Thisrequestispurelyforthefinancial
advantageofthebuilderandthedetrimentofourcommunity.
Becasuewehikethetrailsregularlyandthefeelingofbeinglostinnaturesoclosetohomeisspecial.Itshould
beprotectedandIhopemydaughtercanenjoyitthesamewayoneday.
IliveintheSonorandesertnorthofPhoenix,Don’twantitdestroyedbycontinuingbuilding.Leaveitinit’s
naturalstate,sowecanenjoythedesertforgenerationsplease.
Pleasepreservethebeautifuldesert.
Withalltheplanneddevelopmentinthearea,Ihaveamajorconcernabouttheinfrastructure,andeven
plannedexpansion,beingabletosupporttheadditionalhousinginthepreserve.Partoftheappealofourareais
thedesertbeauty,soadditionally,overturningdistrictsafeguardsnotonlydamagesthenaturalenvironment,
butrisksallthosethatalreadylive/workinthiscommunity.
IbelievetherearemultiplereasonsforkeepingourviewsforalltoenjoyͲtopreservethedesertandthe
animalsͲsowecanenjoythesolaceinthiswonderfulareabywalking,biking,drivingorjustplainrelaxinginthe
outdoors.AlsodrivingonthisSonoranstretchofroadcurrentlyneedsmorerestrictionsͲsuchastrafficlightsat
allintersectionsforturning.MuchspeedingͲneedtohavemoremonitoringofspeedrequirements.Adding
morehousingisjustgoingtoaddtoaloseofthedesertpreserveandimpossiblestreet/roadconditions.When
webuiltourhomehere,weweretoldthattherewererestrictionstokeepourdesertpreserved.
WiththeamountoftrafficonSonoran/DoveValleytoday,whenwepulloutofSonoranGateCommunity,itis
takingachanceonyourlifewhenneedingtoturnleft.Whywouldanyoneapprovemorehomebuildingtoget
moretraffic?AlsocarsͲandtrucksͲarespeedingbetween55Ͳ70milesanhouronthisstretch.Youshouldhave
trafficlightsatallintersectionsforturningtraffic.Also,Let'sSaveOurDesertViewsͲthat'swhywebuiltahome
Ibelievehonoringthemeaningofthepreserveisofutmostimportance.
Page 1135
Myfamilyhikesandmountainbikesseveraltimesperweekonthesetrails.Wetrulyappreciatethislandand
wouldnotwantitsinhabitantstobedisruptedanyfurtherthantheyalreadyare.
ThesceneryisbeautifulalongSonoranDesertDriveandtoseesectionsofitbeingdevelopedforhousing
projectswilltakeawayfromthebeautythatwehaveallcometoloveaboutthisarea.
AsaresidentlivingatFireside,Ihaveseenjavelinas(uptoadozenatatime)andotherwildanimalscomeupto
ourhomelookingforfoodandemptyinggarbageatnight.Bytearingdownmorenaturalandwildhabitatfor
additionalhomeswillonlyincreasetheexistingproblemsfortheanimalsinthedessertwhenmoreoftheir
naturalhabitatistorndown.Stoptearingintothenaturalsurroundingpreserve.
WemovedtoourcurrenthometoenjoythebenefitsofhavingaccesstotheSonoranPreserve.TheDesert
CharacterOverlayDistrictwascreatedtopreservetheintegrityofthispreciouscommodity,ifitisignored,the
beautyandrecreationalbenefitsofthepreservewillbesignificantlyreduced.
Iparticipateinrunningandhikingintheareaandtreasurethenaturalbeautyofthedesertlandscape.
WehaveoverpopulatedtheNorthPhoenixareaalreadywithmanydenseresidencies,namelyapartment
complexesandtownhomes.Ibelieveweneedtoslowdownandconsiderexpansioninadifferentdirectionso
thatwedon'tlosemanyofourbeautifulmountainandnatureparcelsthatweneedtosave.Ifeelthisisbeing
rushedandhasnotbeenthoroughlyreviewedandvetted.
I’velivedinthepreserveareasinceIwasverylittle.Weneedtokeepthedesertadesert,ournativeanimalsare
continuallybeingforcedtocohabitatewithhumansandit’snotgoingwelk.Continuetogivethemtheirspace
sothatwecanalllivetogetherwithouthostileinteraction
Hikingandtheoverallaccesstotheoutdoors
Myconcernisforpublicsafetyfirstandforemost.InadditiontothewideningoftheSonoranroadwayandthe
disregardfortheserenityofthedesert.FinallyIfeeltheCityisgrowingtoofastwithlittleregardforPublic
Safetyandinfrastructuregrowth.
Thisissoimportanttoprotectthenaturalbeauty,wildlife,ecosystems,andquietqualityoflifethatdraws
peopletotheareaandthestateingeneral.Pleaseacttopreventthepotentiallyirreparabledamagediscarding
thesesafeguardscouldcause!
Weneedtomaintainthebeautyofthevalley.Areasneedtobeprotectedandrespectedsoallcanenjoy.
IusetheSonoranpreservealmostdailytogetabriefreprievefromtheovercrowdingofPhoenix.Theabilityto
brieflyenjoythedesertviewswithoutseeingendlessdevelopmentsandchokingsmogofcarsiswhywedecided
toliveinthisarea.
PleasefollowtheDesertCharacterOverlayDistrictplan.Keeptrafficlowandundevelopedlandsowecanenjoy
thepreserve.
TheSonoranpreserveisaspotwhereIhike,bikeandrun5Ͳ6timesperweek.Itrulyenjoythebeautifulnatural
preservethisareahas.TheanimalsIseeduringmyadventuresisalsopriceless.Itrulyhopethispetitionmakes
achange!
Page 1136
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-62-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and GPA-DSTV-1-18- 2)
Date: Monday, April 4, 2022 9:54:09 AM
Attachments: CB_ltr_2019_cmt.docx
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Mandy Fellows
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 7:17 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-62-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and GPA-DSTV-1-18- 2)
Dear Mr. Grande,
In regards to the above subject items scheduled at Desert View Village Meeting on 4/5/22.
First, I have attached a letter written by Dr. Sullivan in 2019 regarding this immediate area. He and a
team from ASU have spent the past 32 years study the elite wildlife and fauna. I would like his letter
distributed, again, to the Village committee. It was given to participants in 2019 when this same
Development was presenting at that time. The letter speaks for itself
Second, I would like to formally request a FEMA study of this Floodplain Designated area prior to the
topsoil being disturbed. Any movement of this Floodplain will create significant increases into
Apache and Cave Creek washes that surround this proposed development. In addition, the bridges
on Sonoran Parkway for these two washes need to be re-evaluated for increased flow! Their bottom
of girder elevation is just at the FEMA 100 year flood flow and they could potentially be wiped out
with increased water activity. These two bridges, if wiped out during a massive monsoon rain, would
strand any homeowners as the access roads out of the development are only between these two
bridges.
Page 1137
Lastly, I would like the committee to understand that the Desert Character Overlay has been in place
since the Sonoran Parkway was put in and needs to be adhered to, as does the current and long
standing Zoning. Just because Taylor Morrison doesn't like it does not make it appropriate to
rezone!! They should be required to alter the development to fit within all those ordinances!! Why
should it be the other way around?? Thousands of Sonoran Preserve wildlife and fauna will be
ruined to put in massive utilities and that is unacceptable as well! A smaller, more elite developer
could build homes on 1 acre sites, less traffic and less utilities! They could sell for 1M+ and no
ordinance changes would be needed. Taylor Morrison is only out for greed and if these ordinances
are changed for them they will surely only want more and more.
The Village and City Planning MUST enforce the DCO and Zoning requirements put in place after
millions of dollars of studies!!
Thank you for your attention and distribution of this letter to the Village for tomorrow's meeting.
Sincerely,
Mandy Fellows
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android [go.onelink.me]
Page 1138
15 March 2019
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Dear Committee Members:
I understand that as a committee, you will consider a proposed rezoning (“Z-62-18-2”)
of a parcel of land immediately north of Cave Buttes in northern Maricopa County. I
contact you to respectfully request that you oppose this rezoning. By so doing you will
act both to protect the natural resource value of the entire Cave Creek watershed and
to subsequently promote additional acquisitions rather than additional development.
I hope to draw your attention to the biological resources available in Cave Buttes,
Maricopa County, resources used by scientists and students, bikers and hikers, bird
watchers and nature enthusiasts, as well as simple residents in their everyday lives. By
placing a high value on the natural diversity of the Cave Buttes area, by insuring that
your actions contribute to the preservation of that area to the fullest extent possible, I
think that you will maximize the use and enjoyment of those areas by all Phoenix area
residents over the coming years of continued growth and coincident incursions into the
surrounding landscapes. I provide my comments as a scientist, resident of the area,
and concerned citizen. More specifically, as a professor of ecology and evolutionary
biology, I have been working in Cave Buttes over 40 years, and in the past ten years
have been conducting continuous long-term studies of a number of wildlife species in
the area (e.g., desert tortoises, horned lizards, spadefoot toads, and others). I know it
well.
Rezoning of the parcel in question will have two major and immediate impacts: 1) loss
of unique valley floor and small wash habitats due to development; and 2) loss of a
critical wildlife corridor connecting the current mountain preserves through the central
valley floor (north and south), and some degree of impact on adjacent corridors in
nearby washes (Apache and Cave creeks). These losses are outlined in greater detail
below.
Habitat loss: flats or valley floors and small washes are unique additions to biotic
diversity of mountain (i.e., upland only) preserves. The specific area in question
represents prime habitat between the southern and northern Union Hills, as it contains
numerous small “feeder” washes between the major drainages of Cave Creek (to the
east) and Apache Wash (to the west). The adjacent floodplains (“flats) and these
washes contain unique habitats not contained within the current mountain preserves
(Sonoran Preserve, north and south). As documented in the Sonoran Preserve Master
Plan (Anonymous, 1998) and the original vegetation surveys (1996, 1998), these wash
habitats are botanically rich, and used by a variety of wildlife species. The valley floor in
this area also contains remnant grassland species (eg, Tobosa, Pencil Cholla and Cane
Page 1139
Cholla) rarely encountered in the Phoenix metro area (more commonly associated with
the Agua Fria Grasslands to the immediate north).
Corridor impacts: The loss of this much habitat adjacent to the Parkway further
degrades the corridor potential over and above that resulting from the Parkway alone.
These connections or corridors allow for critical population exchange. A number of
species, including Sonoran Desert tortoises, javelina, mountain lion and many others,
use the valley floors as corridors. For example, desert tortoises only rarely leave the
uplands, but they must be able to traverse valley floors to maintain a series of
connected populations, genetically speaking. Faced with the prospect of even larger
numbers of local residents, the current connectivity between north and south preserves
would be further compromised.
The most immediate need is for larger areas of valley floors and washes to be
preserved adjacent to the existing mountain preserves, providing both additional habitat
absent from the upland slope areas already protected, AND providing important
linkages for wildlife traveling between these preserves. The broad, historic floodplain
between Apache Wash and Cave Creek, precisely the area to be developed, is the most
desirable acreage to serve the purposes described above (maintain diversity, promote
gene exchange and population connectivity). Ideally, if additional development MUST
occur, it should be moved to the east or the west along the parkway, leaving this high
quality habitat intact.
I can safely state that I have spent more time in Cave Buttes that anyone over the past
ten years. I urge you to use your advisory power to promote protection of this land
and to aid the city of Phoenix in upholding its duty under the public trust to preserve
the value of the land for future generations.
Sincerely,
Brian K. Sullivan, PhD
Professor of Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology
Arizona State University
Page 1140
References:
Anonymous, 1998. Sonoran Preserve Master Plan. City of Phoenix., Burke, J. and J. Ewan, primary
authors. 57 pp.
Ewan, J. M., R. Fish Ewan, T. Craig, and S. Scheiner. 1996. Cave Creek Wash preservation boundary
study. Herberger Center for Design Excellence, ASU, Tempe.
Ewan, J. M., and R. Fish Ewan. 1998. North Phoenix Wash vegetation study. Herberger Center for Design
Excellence, ASU, Tempe. 43 pp.
Page 1141
From: Ann Wilde
To: Julianna Pierre; Anthony M Grande
Subject: Z-TA-5-18-2
Date: Monday, April 4, 2022 10:09:23 PM
Please distribute the comments below to members of the Desert View Planning
Committee.
Not long ago I was at the Whitewater Draw and saw a Nature Note posited by Arizona
Game and Fish Department:
In part the Note read, "The primary threat to the existence of any wildlife population is
the loss or degradation of its habitat. . . .Take away the lifeblood of an ecosystem,
and in time, the ecosystem also dies."
On the VerdinPhoenix.com website one reads:
"As State Trust land surrounding Sonoran Desert Drive is auctioned off in the future
for employment, commercial, and residential uses to support . . . this growth, our goal
is that Verdin will set a stunning precedent for desert-sensitive development adjacent
to the Sonoran Preserve."
Also stated:
"Our vision for Verdin is to create an authentic desert community that brings the
wonder and peace of nature into daily life."
The two statements conflict with the request to amend (or move away from the
proposed project) the provisions that protect the desert ecosystem. Once the
ecosystem is altered in a major way, it won't recover. Unintended repercussions may
develop in coming years. For many years the area currently proposed for
development has been zoned for a housing density that was determined suitable for
the area.
Please hold firm to the vision in place when it was written that "the Desert View
Village has "land uses [that] compliment the equestrian ranch properties, with vast
amounts of open space and large lot single-family residences."
The desert maintenance overlay Sub-District A does not have to be amended or
removed for development to occur--only for development to occur as currently
proposed for the Verdin project.
The existing and current zoning requiring lower density housing supports
better preservation of habitat and movement of wildlife.
The City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance Section 653A states that "[the] Desert
Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density
allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and
the wildlife corridor along Cave Creek Wash."
The ordinance continues in 653B to state "[It's] purpose . . . is to guide development
that will blend with the undisturbed desert environment rather than dominate it."
The advantages of maintaining the desert maintenance character overlay:
Page 1142
-provides guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert;
-encourages development that will blend with the undisturbed desert rather than
dominate it;
-natural washes and the surrounding area are protected.
As an ordinary person who lives in the general area and values nature and the desert,
I support keeping the desert maintenance character overlay as it currently exists
along Sonoran Desert Drive.
I respectfully request that you give serious consideration to supporting development
at the lower housing density supported by the Desert Maintenance Character
Overlay. I realize that housing is needed; more housing requires more water and
infrastructure; and growth will not be stopped. Hopefully, with your recommendation,
growth will occur in a measured manner that supports maintaining a desert character,
rather than a large master planned community with triple the number of homes
imposed on a fragile ecosystem.
Thank you for taking the time to consider these thoughts.
Ann Wilde
Page 1143
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Letter to the Desert View VPC for the Verdin Project (Formerly MacEwen 480)
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 12:55:25 PM
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Keeli Keeler
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 12:52 PM
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Letter to the Desert View VPC for the Verdin Project (Formerly MacEwen 480)
As a local resident in the area and concerned citizen I would like to reach out to you, the Desert View
Village Planning Committee, as you prepare to meet this evening to discuss and vote on the Verdin
Project. I am not opposed to development of the property off of Sonoran Desert Drive across
from the Preserve, however, I am opposed to the realignment and zoning amendments that
Taylor Morrison is seeking approval for in relation to the Verdin/MacEwen 480 Project, Z-62-18-
2.
Development is bound to occur as people continue to move to the Phoenix area and more housing is
needed. However, I ask for you to consider the overwhelming presence of residents living in the
area, outdoor enthusiasts who frequently bike and hike in the area, and people invested in the
preservation of this land from all across Phoenix that were in such strong opposition to these same
proposed changes back in 2019. I appreciate that after such a strong opposition that Taylor Morrison
went back to the drawing board to address some of the concerns of traffic and partnered with the
National Wildlife Foundation to address some of the preservation concerns. However, they are still
requesting to remove other protective measures that were put in place to help preserve the
beauty of this land and surrounding preserve. It is a unique piece of land that is directly across
from the Preserve, and should be treated as such. Decisions made for development today will
impact future development along this corridor when state trust land is sold off to developers. The
community and the VPC are in a unique position to keep developers accountable for responsible
Page 1144
development in such a unique and beautiful part of the valley.
This property in consideration was a privately owned parcel that was sold to Taylor Morrison and
does in fact currently allow for development of homes. However, the current zoning would restrict
Taylor Morrison to 1 home per acre. Under current zoning, these would be estate properties
similar to some of the other unique and protected areas around Northern Phoenix like the Boulders,
Spur Cross Ranch, etc., and would support the initial intent of zoning in this area to minimize impact
to the surrounding desert. However, Taylot Morrison is not in the business of estate-type properties,
but instead the business master planned communities with as many homes as possible. Taylor
Morrison's attorney has gone so far as trying to convince everyone that by adding in some open
edges, homeowner classes, and by creating trails to join to the preserve that it will not change how
the desert looks or impact any of the surrounding wildlife, plants, and preserve by increasing the
zoning to allow 3-5 homes per acre. While these are all nice things to add to the community that
came from suggestions by the NWF, it is absolutely false as rezoning to allow that many homes
will in fact impact the surrounding desert, wildlife and strain resources. Rezoning the parcel in
question will have some major and immediate impacts: 1) negative impact to the habitat
from development and destruction of the unique valley floor 2) negative impact to the wildlife
corridor, and 3) subsequent impact on adjacent land, flora, fauna and wildlife. Taylor Morrison is a
business - the business of building as many homes for as much profit as they possibly can - these
requests for rezoning are nothing more than that. For them it isn't about the environment or the
community, but profits and opportunities to maximize growth. I strongly request the VPC to
consider the impact that the rezoning request would have and vote NO on the portion of the
request.
Taylor Morrison is also requesting to move and/or completely remove the desert character overlay
from the property in question. Their attorney and council has tried to create a story that the initial
plan for the desert character overlay was only the intent for that time period versus a well thought
out effort to help protect an important habitat from massive future development. Additionally,
Taylor Morrison's legal representative has also tried to state that it should be moved because of the
change in where the road was put through instead of the initial plan of where the road was
anticipated to go. Based on the research that I was able to do and comments from others who were
around when the group was formed to create the initial desert character overlay, the intent of the
desert character overlay took into account the future intent to develop in the area and was created
to in fact help protect vital areas of the desert to minimize impact to the Preserve. Taylor
Morrison's attorney has created a false narrative in order to benefit a developer who has
attempted to appear like they are invested in sustainable and thoughtful development, but by all
attempts of removing protections in place is the exact opposite. Attempts to move the desert
character overlay north of Sonoran Desert Drive actually removes the desert character overlay
completely from the Taylor Morrison property for the Verdin project, and is completely useless as
that area is preserve land and as such is protected. By allowing a change/removal of the desert
character overlay to happen, it would also have major impacts to the surrounding desert and
wildlife, and only benefits the developer to allow more homes in an area in which they were never
intended. I strongly request the VPC to consider the impact that the desert overlay request
would have and vote NO on the portion of the request.
Page 1145
At the North Gateway VPC meeting last month, Taylor Morrison had some of their homeowners who
live in the neighboring Sonoran Gate community speak up in support of this development. The sole
argument from the two homeowners in support was the need for affordable housing in Phoenix and
how great it would be to have affordable housing in such a unique location so that people can enjoy
it. While it is true that Phoenix can use some additional affordable housing and that this is indeed a
unique piece of land in a unique area next to the preserve, any efforts to create "affordable
housing" will not exist in this area despite the lot size or number of homes just based on
proximity to the preserve and surrounding views. Additionally, this argument in support fails to
consider the impact that allowing this development to markedly change zoning requirements to
add at least 3-4 times the amount of homes in the intended area will have on the surrounding
desert as well as the future development that will follow as the state trust land is sold off to other
developers, which will completely negate any argument of people being able to enjoy it. People can
currently enjoy it by visiting the Apache Wash Trailhead to bike, hike, horseback ride, enjoy the
scenery and the wildlife. Mass development will impact the environment, wildlife, views, and
therefore make the area less of a beauty to enjoy. The Verdin / MacEwen 480 project will set a
precedent for how future development will go. Please help us stand in opposition to a massive
development right next to the preserve and support the intent of the current desert character
overlay and zoning to uphold responsible and sustainable development along this corridor.
As I had mentioned prior, development is bound to occur based on sheer need, but the decisions
that are made now can either help support responsible development in such a unique location or
solely benefit this developer and the others to come without taking into account the community
and Preserve.
I would request that the Desert View VPC:
1) Maintain the Master Plan as originally proposed within the current zoning
2) Maintain the desert character overlay to effectively control development surrounding the entire
Preserve area
3) Recognize the impact that the desert, Preserve, wildlife, flora and fauna, strain on resources, and
stress on infrastructure that massive development would have within the corridor.
Sincerely,
Keeli Keeler
Homeowner in Sonoran Foothills (Phoenix 85085)
Page 1146
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Fwd: Sonoran preserve. Let"s actually preserve it!
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:35:58 PM
Please add to the public record
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Dawn M
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:10 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Sonoran preserve. Let's actually preserve it!
Jim,
As a local resident, I am against any realignment/zoning amendment of Phoenix’s Master
Plan for the Sonoran Preserve as it relates to Taylor Morrison’s request for the
Verdin/McEwan 480 Project, Z-62-18-2. Key objection elements of the amendment include:
1. Remove the Desert Character Overlay requirement
2. Build homes outside of existing infrastructure
3. Massive up zone, 3–5 houses per acre
The developer is seeking to transform the Desert Character Overlay around the Preserve.
Moving it north of Sonoran Desert Drive is actually removing it because north of Sonoran
Desert Drive is the Preserve itself.
Regardless of previous statements, if all Plan Amendments proposed are passed, the
development will not be “truly unique.” Nor will it be as the developer committed, “ . . . a
context-sensitive community that sets the bar high for any future development in the area.”
It seems all the developer sees is growth, not thoughtful development, or sustainability. This
Plan Amendment only benefits the developer and not the community or the Preserve.
I am not a “recreational activist,” as cited on a recent local newscast. My objections seek to:
a. Maintain the Master Plan as originally proposed
b. Recognize the dismal condition of the Valley’s current and future water supply
c. Maintain the overlay as the effective way to control development in the entire Preserve
area
Kindly,
Dawn Mannon
Phoenix, Az
*******
Page 1147
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: preserving the Sonoran preserve
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:16:24 PM
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Dawn M
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:13 PM
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: preserving the Sonoran preserve
As a resident of Phoenix (for almot 50 years), I have seen mass destruction of our beautiful desert. I
employ you to keep the desert overlay at the Sonoran Preserve. Please do not build massive
amounts of homes in our desert.
thank you,
Dawn Mannon
Phoenix, AZ
Page 1148
From: Susanne Rothwell
To: Julianna Pierre
Cc: Patrick and Eileen McMullen
Subject: FW: Final PMPC Letter (and contact info if helpful!)
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 10:52:39 AM
Attachments: FINAL 2022_03_31 Letter to City of Phoenix re VERDIN Applications[1].docx
Importance: High
Hello Julianna and the Desert View Village Planning Committee,
Please read the attached letter from Phoenix Mountains Preservation Committee (PMPC) President
Patrick McMullen and the PMPC board.
It is in regards to the proposed Taylor Morrison ‘Verdin’ re-zoning case coming before the
Committee tomorrow.
It is late so hoping that you will have some time to read it, as it is a particularly important issue for
the PMPC.
Kindest regards,
Susanne Rothwell
PMPC
Page 1149
PMPC SUMMARY - APRIL 3, 2022
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization charged
with the protection of the Phoenix Mountains Preserves write to you with our strong
support and encouragement to engage and monitor the Verdin Development of the 480
acres situated to the west of Cave Creek Wash and to the south of the Sonoran Parkway.
The Verdin location abuts to Sonoran Preserve.
The attached legal research conducted by the PMPC Attorney, lists our concerns and we
hope that you and City departments will continue to take them seriously and will apply the
sections of the zoning Ordinance that were written and included into the Ordinance to
protect these Preserve adjacencies and to ensure that the Preserves will remain available
to the public and enjoyable as well.
PMPC understands that Phoenix is a rapidly growing city and that large numbers of the
new population must be accommodated. A great effort was undertaken in past decades
to have the Sonoran Preserve acquired by the City at tax payer expense, with a large
effort by PMPC to identify and help to support the City efforts. We therefore are very
dedicated to keeping the Preserves available to the local citizens, and the Desert
Character Overlay continued and appreciated.
The Verdin Development planning team has taken important steps in the linking up of the
Sonoran Preserves, emphasis on desert plant maintenance, protection of plants and
animals, and meaningful public access to the Desert Preserves surrounding the new
Verdin development. What is needed is a more formal arrangement between the City of
Phoenix, Phoenix Citizens and the Verdin 480 Acre Development project team.
As a remembrance; On February 17, 1998, the [City] Council also voted unanimously to
adopt the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan and to move forward in acquiring this open
space. In doing so, the Council continues a time-honored precedent for protecting and
preserving desert open space within the city and for ensuring recreational access for our
citizens.”
PMPC is intensely interested in the pending development of the Verdin 480 acre site, as
it is an early project in the development of this corridor, and especially important for the
continued Desert character Overlay District enforcement.
Sincerely,
Patrick McMullen, PhD
Patrick McMullen, PhD
PMPC President
Page 1150
March 3, 2022
Mayor Kate Gallego Phoenix City Councilmembers
Phoenix City Hall Phoenix City Hall
200 W. Washington St. 200 W. Washington St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003 Phoenix, AZ 85003
Re: Objections of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. (PMPC) to
the Four Applications Submitted for “Verdin” Development Proposal (GPA-
DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2 and Z-62-18-2)
Dear Mayor Gallego:
This letter is submitted by the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc.
(PMPC) in opposition to the proposed Taylor Morrison “Verdin” housing development
project south of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th Street and 32nd Street alignments,
just west of Cave Creek Road in northern Phoenix (formerly “MacEwen 480”). We
understand that developer Taylor Morrison has filed several applications in furtherance
of this development including two zoning amendments, a General Plan Amendment, and
a Planned Unit Development application (hereinafter the “four applications”). 1 We
understand that these four applications were simultaneously approved by the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee on March 10, 2022 2, and the Desert View Village
Planning Committee is scheduled to meet on these four applications on April 5, 2022. 3
PMPC strongly objects to any actions, at any level, that would advance the four
applications as written, for reasons stated herein. First – the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District should not be modified but must remain intact, ensuring that washes, sensitive
species and their habitats, and the delicate desert ecosystem remain protected. The
rezoning is not simply a “technical clean-up” as the developer casually asserts, 4 but
rather, this rezoning would be an unprecedented rollback of protections carefully
researched and thoughtfully added to the Phoenix Zoning Code for this specific area
decades ago – protections that were specifically adopted to protect this desert area from
the very type of development pressure that is presented here. Second – simultaneous
consideration and approval of these four applications is contrary to the law and City of
Phoenix policy. Furthermore, public notice has been deficient.
General Plan Amendment (GPA-DSTV-1-18-2); Zoning Amendments (Z-75-18-2 and Z-75-5-
18); and Planned Unit Development (Z-62-18-2).
See Notice of Results, North Gateway Village Planning Committee Meeting (March 10, 2022).
See Notice of Public Meeting, Desert View Village Planning Committee (April 5, 2022).
See Letter re Z-75-18-2 Zoning Map Amendment (December 17, 2021), p.2
Page 1151
On behalf of PMPC, I ask that these applications not be approved as written but
that the Desert Maintenance Overlay District remain wholly intact, ensuring that
protections to washes, sensitive species and their habitats, and the delicate desert
ecosystem remain as intended.
About PMPC
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. is an organization founded in
1970 by Arizona visionaries dedicated to the protection of Phoenix’s Mountain Preserve
system. For the last 50 years, PMPC and its members have worked tirelessly to preserve,
protect, and advocate for the precious Mountain Preserve system, and to monitor and
address the rapid growth and development surrounding these important public resources.
For much of Phoenix’s modern history, our PMPC membership has worked hard
alongside hundreds of concerned Phoenix citizens and City staff to ensure that the
Sonoran Desert Preserves are protected and maintained as a valuable resource for all
citizens of Phoenix.
I. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District Must Not Be Altered
For many decades, protecting and preserving the unique desert features of the
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and the surrounding area has been a priority for the City of
Phoenix. The PMPC and its members were involved in and supported the development
and adoption of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (“DMOD” or “DMOD Overlay”)
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance in 2001, and the related working groups and
charettes involved with that process, as well as the formation and expansion of the
Phoenix Mountain Preserves. We support the critical protections carefully enacted by the
outlined in the DMOD Overlay, which must remain intact.
The true history of how the DMOD Overlay was developed is compelling. It is a
landmark instance of how land planning and landscape ecological principles can be
integrated as part of policy drafting processes. It should be a point of pride for the City of
Phoenix, and an asset worth protecting. Furthermore, the history shows that the DMOD
Overlay area and its boundaries were not simply dictated by road alignments (as the
developer incorrectly claims), but instead were carefully studied and thoughtfully drafted
in a manner integrating ecological considerations with planning structure, as part of one
of the most robust and widely supported Phoenix endeavors, to date. Finally, the owner(s)
of the “Verdin” property have owned this land for at least the last half-century, and have
had ample time and opportunities to challenge its classification over the last several
decades. The DMOD Overlay must not be altered.
Page 1152
History of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (DMOD)
On July 5, 2001, the approximately 6,724-acre DMOD was added to the Phoenix City
Zoning Ordinance at Section 653 (Sub-Districts A & B), shown on the following page. 5
It was carefully constructed by a large, interdisciplinary collaborative effort over
several years to study and understand the unique and sensitive characteristics of this
area, and protect those characteristics from the pressures of development. Historical city
documents and studies, reports, articles, and other research materials describe this
history, as summarized below.
1980s
On January 19, 1985, a large portion of northern Phoenix (including the current
DMOD Overlay area) was annexed into the city. 6 Tensions between increasing
development and impacts on sensitive desert areas were rising during this time. Spurred
in part by these tensions and concerns over the proposed development at Tatum Ranch, 7
the City Council developed a plan for this larger area, then called the peripheral Areas C
and D Areas, with “extensive” community assistance from a Council-appointed Citizen’s
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts).
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 4; see also City of Phoenix Annexation Map.
See Quay, Ray. “Bridging the Gap Between Ecological Research and Land Use Policy: The
North Sonoran Collaborative” Urban Ecosystems, 7:283-294 (2004). Tatum Ranch was one of
the first developments to use groundwater and wastewater, opening the doors for more
development north of the CAP canal.
Page 1153
Advisory Committee, as well as support from the State. 8 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan
was adopted in 1987.
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was intended to direct the City of Phoenix on
future land use and development densities “to ensure that development in the area was
compatible with and complementary to the unique and environmentally sensitive
characteristics of the area.” 9 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan describes this new
proactive approach: “Normally, the City is placed in a reactive role with respect to guiding
growth of a developing area. These northern areas; however, are largely undeveloped
and provide the City with a unique opportunity to anticipate growth and to establish an
overall framework to guide physical development.”10 Even at the time, the City recognized
that more work would be needed towards developing future protections, such as an
ordinance. 11
1990s
Development continued to increase in northern Phoenix during the early 1990s.
Subsequently, concerns about density and form of development within the ecologically
sensitive desert areas came to a critical point. A diverse group of public and private
planners, designers, environmental scientists, landscape architects, university
departments, as well as representatives from state agencies, private consultants, the City
of Phoenix, and State of Arizona began collaborating on a variety of studies, plans, and
charrettes for this area during this time. 12 This group (called the North Sonoran
Collaborative), formed and met regularly to address the gap between managing growth
and the ecological data needed to accomplish these goals. Their research was organized
into a multi-disciplinary GIS database, 13 one of the early instances of GIS usage by the
city and significant part of the group’s success.
The City of Phoenix began the process of revising the General Plan with detailed
objectives and design standards for this area during this time. The absence of ecological
See General Plan: Peripheral Areas C and D, City of Phoenix Planning Department, October
1987.
See City of Phoenix Planning Department Staff Report No. 58-01-02 (June 13, 2001),
recommending approval of the DMOD Overlay, at 2. Obtained via Public Records Request.
See FN 8 at 1.
See FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9 (p.2); see also FN 7; see also “ASU Program Stresses Ecological Approach to City
Planning”, University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center Newsletter, November-
December 1999, at 9.
See Ward, B., Burke, J., Ewan, J., Fish Ewan, R., Miller, W., Quay, R., Steiner, F. 1999. “A
Collaborative Approach to Planning.” ASU School of Planning & Landscape Architecture.
Page 1154
information about the Northern Sonoran Desert was quickly recognized as a major
barrier, 14 so the City turned to the North Sonoran Collaborative and Arizona State
University (ASU) School of Planning and Landscape Architecture to conduct this much-
needed work. The city funded a detailed study of the Cave Creek Wash by ASU, the
success of which led to several additional studies of other nearby washes. 15 The Cave
Creek Study also helped build momentum for the acquisition of 15,000 acres of Preserve
lands including along the Cave Creek Wash corridor.
As a result of these extensive studies, a radical departure in methodology was
forming. “Basing preservation boundaries on ecosystems rather than topography or land
ownership is new to Phoenix. In the past, boundaries did not reflect the ecological
systems inherent in the landscape and so the impact of preserve size, shape, and
constitution on plant and wildlife habitats were not considered nor well understood.” 16
These and other processes led directly to the North Land Use Plan (adopted 1996)
and the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (adopted 1998). Based in part on interviews with
neighbors in the area, the North Land Use Plan identified three Character Areas – the
Desert Preserve (today’s DMOD Overlay), the Rural Desert, and Suburban Desert – and
required that zoning overlay districts be created for each area “to provide clear
development standards which reflect community desires for each area.” 17
It is worth highlighting that the Desert Overlay development process was so unique
and ambitious that an entire session series of presentations were devoted to it at the 1999
American Planning Association’s National Conference held in Seattle, Washington. 18
Presenters included ASU professors, City of Phoenix Planning Deputy Director James
Burke, Assistant Director Ray Quay (all Collaborative members) who traveled from
Arizona to Washington to present their work to planners across the United States.
In a conference paper presented to planners nationwide, Terry Newton of the
Phoenix Planning Department noted that “the process for developing the three overlay
See FN 8.
This study was reportedly conducted by a team of ecologists and biologists from the ASU
Schools of Planning and Landscape Architecture and Life Sciences Department, Northern
Arizona University, the Desert Botanical Gardens, and the Arizona Game and Fish Department.
Their report on the biological values of Cave Creek Wash entitled “Cave Creek Wash:
Preservation Boundary Study” was published in 1996.
See Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (1998), at 16.
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 19.
See 1999 APA National Planning Conference file (WorldCat record); see 1999 APA National
Planning Conference Table of Contents (see Session Series on The North Sonoran Collaborative,
five papers linked).
Page 1155
ordinances is unlike any the city has undertaken in the past.” He continued, saying that
these guidelines could “set a new standard for the city’s approach to development in
natural desert areas for the city.” 19 He further described the specific acreage targeted for
protection:
“Much of the area identified by Subdistricts A and B is included in the
Arizona Preserve Initiative (API) application which is currently being
pursued by the city. Of the approximately 5,000 acres identified as
Subdistrict A, only 900 acres are outside of the API area. Subdistrict B
consists of approximately 1,700 acres with 1,500 acres falling outside of the
API area. Assuming the API area as currently identified successfully
becomes a preserve, approximately 2,400 acres in Subdistricts A and B
would remain for possible development. This is the area addressed by
this Overlay.” (Emphasis Added).
For reference, the current proposed rezoning applications submitted by developer
Taylor Morrison propose to remove approximately 218 acres of the 900 acres of
developable non-Preserve area from Subdistrict A, or about 24%. 20 While the number of
developable acreages may have shifted since this time, it is crucial to note that the
Overlay was developed to specifically target these developable acreages for protection
from intense development – including the intense residential development presented by
the “Verdin” project.
2000s
On June 13, 2001, the City Planning Commission met to consider and recommend
adoption of the DMOD Overlay to the City Council. On June 27, 2001, the City of Phoenix
granted the request as recommended, adopting the DMOD Overlay into the City Zoning
Ordinance. 21 Minutes from the June 13th Planning Commission hearing reveal the robust
community input and public involvement that supported writing the DMOD Overlay text. 22
Staff Report No. 58-01-2 23 recommending approval states:
See Newton, Terry, City of Phoenix Planning Department. Desert Character Overlay Zoning
District, Conference Paper presented to the American Planning Association, Seattle, WA. 1999.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 (March 9, 2022) at 12.
See FN 9. See also Application No. Z-TA-3-99-2 (to add the Desert Character Overlay District
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance); see Zoning Application No. Z-58-01-2 (establish the
Desert Maintenance Overlay District, one of three character districts authorized under Section
653); see Ordinance No. G-4380 and RCA35880 dated July 5, 2001 (adopting Ordinance).
See City of Phoenix Planning Commission Minutes (June 13, 2001) at 62; see also FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9.
Page 1156
“The area has a high scenic value containing stands of dense native
vegetation, which support a delicate and fragile eco-system. Within the
proposed overlay is Cave Creek Wash, a unique wash system which is
designated for incorporation into the City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. The
Desert Maintenance District is intended to provide a buffer/transition
between this environmentally sensitive area and existing
development. This is an area with many washes of varying size which are
tributaries to Cave Creek Wash. It is an area of high habitat value that is
critical to the survival of numerous small mammals and a variety of
birds, as well as reptiles. Maintenance of the Sonoran Desert in this
area requires sensitive development strategies.”
2001), recommending approval of Z-58-01-2 and Z-TA-3-99-2. (Emphasis
added).
The DMOD Overlay was codified in the Zoning Ordinance at Section 653. Within
its very first paragraph: “The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development.” 24
The DMOD Overlay is split into Subdistricts A and B. Subdistrict A requires
minimum lot sizes of 35,000 square feet or greater, or 0-1.2 dwelling units per acre. 25
Subdistrict B requires minimum lot sizes of 18,000 square feet or greater, or 2-5 dwelling
units per acre. 26 Section 653(A) explains why development densities are more restrictive
in Subdistrict A (where a portion of the proposed “Verdin” project lies and which is the
subject of the rezoning applications) as follows:
“With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and
intensity of residential development characterize this area. The
Desert Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with
regards to density allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the
fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low density development which may
be sited in clusters along with provision for an area to allow access to the
Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of development in this
See FN 5 at Section (A).
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(5); see also FN 9 at 3.
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(6); see also FN 9 at 3.
Page 1157
area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas and washes
becomes possible.”
The DMOD Overlay is the only one of these three overlays completed to date. For
reasons not stated, the remaining two Desert Character Overlay Districts (Rural Desert
Overlay, Sec. 653(C) and the Suburban Desert Overlay, Sec. 653(D)) were never added
to the Desert Character Overlay District (Sec. 653), but have remained “Reserved” for the
past two decades. 27
While development has continued throughout the city, the thoughtfully formulated
Overlay at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance has stood the test of time. Since adoption
in 2001, it has never been amended. However, granting the rezoning proposed by the
Taylor Morrison “Verdin” development to lift the DMOD Overlay will set a disastrous
precedent, allowing a developer to carve themselves out of the protective, robust Overlay
to facilitate their more dense (and thus more profitable) development plans. Removal of
these protections sets a chilling precedent for the survival of Sonoran Preserve and the
remaining acres of sensitive desert habitat and wash systems. The “Verdin” project
should not be exempted from the protective DMOD Overlay.
The “Technical Clean-Up” Road Alignment Argument Is Wrong
In a transparent effort to side step the powerful history and compelling reasoning
behind the Overlay, the developer claims that the requested rezonings (Z-75-18-2 and Z-
TA-5-18-2) to remove the DMOD Overlay from their property are just a “technical clean
ups” 28 to change the Overlay boundaries to align with Sonoran Desert Drive instead with
the Northeast Outer Loop alignment contemplated in the Peripheral Areas C & D Plan.
This is not true. The DMOD Overlay was never intended to move with any changes to the
proposed roadway.
The Sonoran Preserve Parkway route alignment involved a complex process that
included area residents, PMPC, the State Land Department, and Preserve and Parks
Committee study partners studying multiple alternatives. 29 After extensive public review,
one alignment was selected out of five. During a presentation to the Parks & Recreation
Board meeting, it was discussed that the selected Parkway alignment was chosen to
maintain existing wildlife corridors in the area, among other things. At the meeting Board
Chairperson Jim Holway asked “if there was a reason why the alignment had not been
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts), Subsections C & D.
See Letter from Susan Demmitt to Desert View Village Planner Julianna Pierre re Zoning Map
Amendment application Z-75-18-2 (December 17, 2021). Received via Public Records Request.
See Sonoran Desert Drive Alignment Study Fact Sheet.
Page 1158
brought to the edge of the preserve.” Staff and Parks & Preserve Administrator Sarah Hall
explained that this was due to “major wash crossings” in the area, among other things. 30
A City Council Report recommending approval of the final Sonoran Parkway
alignment similarly states: “Special care was taken to maintain views of the surrounding
terrain, minimize scarring, preserve existing vegetation, and provide for wildlife crossings.
Provisions for future trail crossings have been incorporated and structure designs include
aesthetic treatment with native colors and textures to blend into the adjacent desert
landscape. Segments of the alignment will abut future Mountain Preserve and serve as a
buffer between the Mountain Preserve and adjacent development.” 31
Never, in any part of the extensive Sonoran Parkway alignment review process,
was there ever a mention that the new alignment was intended to redraw the boundary
of the recently-adopted DMOD Overlay. Rather, the Sonoran Parkway alignment was not
intended to redraw the DMOD Overlay, it was intended to traverse it. The alignment was
specifically chosen to be harmonious with sensitive ecological features, not to pull back
protections for these features as the developer seems to suggest now.
Even the City of Phoenix 32 appears to reject the developer’s “technical clean-up”
roadway claim. Below (left) is the applicant’s proposed rezoning, reducing the DMOD
Overlay over a large swath. Below (right) is the City’s proposed modification, which
exempts just the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay. Plainly, from these maps, the
“technical clean-up” roadway claim does not stand.
See Phoenix Parks & Recreation Board Meeting Minutes (June 26, 2003) at 9-10.
See City Council Report, Transportation, Parks & Seniors Subcommittee (June 8, 2006).
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
Page 1159
The proposed “Verdin” project lie underneath Mesquite Wash, an important habitat
for many desert species, which runs through the heart of the property. Removal of the
DMOD Overlay would entirely remove the protections to Mesquite Wash. The “Verdin”
project would also intrude on Cave Creek Wash to the east, an important wildlife corridor
between the existing Preserve lands located to the north and south. A development more
dense than currently allowed would threaten the integrity and cut off connectivity of these
wildlife corridors. Indeed, one of the smallest birds native to the Sonoran Desert known
as the “Verdin” makes its home in wildlife corridors and washes including those that
would be threatened by the proposed “Verdin” development.
A blatant carve-out of the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay to enable
more dense development is inappropriate. This flies in the face of so many years of hard
work, thoughtful community input and public review, careful research, and proactive good
planning. It is directly contrary to the intent of the DMOD Overlay, which exists to
proactively protect the sensitive desert ecosystem from developmental pressures, not
react to their desires. It also sets an awful precedent, opening the doors for future
developers to make similar requests, rendering the DMOD Overlay effectively
meaningless.
II. ISSUES REGARDING PROCESS
Simultaneous Consideration of All Cases Is Not Permitted
These four applications were simultaneously presented on, discussed, and
approved for recommendation through a vote by the North Gateway Village Planning
Committee on March 10, 2022. 33 The Desert View Village Planning Committee is
scheduled to meet and take action on these “companion cases” on April 5, 2022. 34 This
is not permitted under City of Phoenix processes and the law.
The City of Phoenix’s General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide 35 notes
that simultaneous review of rezoning applications and requests to amend the General
Plan is prohibited. It specifically states:
May my rezoning application be reviewed simultaneously with my
application to amend the GENERAL PLAN?
No. Current City policy requires that action on a rezoning application is
separate from the procedure to amend the General Plan as State law
requires that all rezoning be consistent with and conform to the adopted
See FN 2.
See FN 3.
See City of Phoenix General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide (rev. 08/12/2021)
Page 1160
General Plan. A hearing on the rezoning application is to occur subsequent
to a determination on the change to the General Plan. However, you may
file your rezoning application and be scheduled for a hearing agenda
following action on the General Plan amendment. Note: This requirement
can be waived by the Planning and Development Director upon written
request for special circumstances.
General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide, at p.2
A.R.S. § 9-462.01(F) states in relevant part that “[a]ll zoning and rezoning
ordinances adopted under this article shall be consistent with and conform to the adopted
general plan of the municipality”. It is the intent of the Legislature that revisions to the
General Plan must occur prior to, not simultaneous with, zoning and rezonings. This is an
important process as it protects the integrity of the General Plan and the processes
involved in its revision, including (but not at all limited to), ongoing public notice and
participation.
Exceptions to this requirement have not occurred and do not apply here.
Scheduling of a hearing agenda following action on the General Plan is not occurring
here, as the Verdin Minor General Plan Amendment Submittal (Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2) admits that “[t]his Amendment is being processed concurrently with applications to
change the zoning on the Property…” 36 Finally, there has been no indication that
developer Taylor Morrison has ever requested a written waiver of this explicit
requirement.
In addition, the General Plan Amendment Planning Process makes clear that the
contents of a General Plan Amendment hearing and a Rezoning hearing are quite
different. 37 For instance, certain zoning issues are “not appropriate for discussion” at a
General Plan Amendment hearing, including setbacks, elevation, open space, amenities,
and other topics. Simultaneous consideration of all of these applications, and
consideration of all of these topics at one single hearing, is inappropriate and contrary to
Phoenix City policies and Arizona laws governing municipal planning.
All Procedures for the Cases Must Be Complied With
On December 7, 2021 and December 9, 2021, the four applications were
presented and discussed at the Desert View Village Planning Committee and the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee regular monthly meetings, respectively. 38 On
See Verdin Major General Plan Amendment Submittal (December 17, 2021), p.5 (obtained via
public records request).
See FN 34 at 2-3.
See Desert View Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 7, 2021); see
North Gateway Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 9, 2021).
Page 1161
December 17, 2021 and after these informational meetings, the General Plan
Amendment Application was resubmitted to the Planning & Development Department (the
first submittal having occurred over three years prior). 39 However, no further presentation
and discussion of this resubmittal occurred prior to voting meetings.
Neighborhood notification and meetings are also a requirement of the General
Plan Amendment process. Specifically, applicants are required to meet with property
owners within 600 feet of the subject site to present the proposal, and attempt to address
resident concerns. Furthermore, the General Plan Amendment Process Guide 40 requires:
“The results of that meeting shall be summarized and forwarded to the
village planner in whose village the case is located. No hearings shall be
scheduled without submittal of the following information:
x Date, time, and location of the meeting
x Number of participants
x Issues that arose during the meeting
x Plan to resolve the issues, if possible”
It is unclear whether this requirement has been met. Furthermore, if such a
meeting has occurred, it is important to determine whether the meeting occurred prior or
subsequent to the major resubmittal in December 2021. This is critical. Fundamental to
the planning process are ample, advance public notice allowing time for meaningful
review, engagement and participation.
For reasons stated above, the bundling of these four cases (rezoning applications,
request to amend the General Plan, and Planned Unit Development) is improper and
prohibited by the City of Phoenix’s own policy. Progression of these cases must stop on
this basis alone.
Public Review Opportunities Have Been Insufficient
The City of Phoenix Staff Report for Verdin PUD was not finalized until March 9,
2022, and was not posted on the Planned Unit Development Case List until just before
the North Gateway Village Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 41
Similarly, the City of Phoenix Staff Analysis for the General Plan Amendment was not
finalized until March 9, 2022. 42 Bafflingly, it is posted on the General Plan Amendment
See FN 35.
See FN 34.
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
See Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
Page 1162
Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022”, making it highly unlikely that an
interested citizen would easily be able to locate and review it (if they even knew it was
there). The City of Phoenix Staff Report for the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment was
also not finalized until March 9, 2022. 43 Also bafflingly, it is posted on the Rezoning &
Text Amendment Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022.” This stymies the
good-faith efforts of even the most persistent interested citizen, and certainly stifles public
participation.
Additionally, revisions to the Verdin PUD Narrative have repeatedly been
resubmitted by developer Taylor Morrison over the past three months. The most recent
resubmission was on March 3, 2022, a few short days before the North Gateway Village
Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 44 No notification of this updated
draft (or the specific changes it contains) was received in advance of the March 10th
meeting.
No notification or alert was ever received that these reports or updates were even
available, leaving no time for any meaningful public review (or even awareness of their
existence) prior to the first Village voting meeting. This is made more egregious by the
fact that there are significant public concerns with this development, which have been
repeatedly raised throughout the years. In fact, public concern about this project has been
expressed since the project was first proposed as “MacEwen 480” in 2018. 45 As the City
is likely aware, the organization known as Save Our Sonoran Preserve was formed by
residents in response to these very threats from this project and SOS has fiercely
advocated for protection of the Preserve and DMOD Overlay ever since.
Although the Public Meeting materials included allotted time for “Public
Comments”, this opportunity is not meaningful, when the public is not given sufficient time
to review the relevant documents in advance of key voting meetings. Proper time for
public participation and notice are required components of the public process for all of
these cases. As you know, A.R.S. § 9-461.06(C) directs municipalities to provide for
“effective, early and continuous public participation” with respect to General Plan
amendment processes.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
See Verdin PUD Narrative.
See “1,420 homes may line 9,671 acres of preserved north Phoenix desert” (AZCentral,
January 12, 2022); see “Hikers upset home builder may redevelop part of North Phoenix desert”
(AZFamily, February 28, 2022); see “Preserve at odds with high density housing” (Sonoran News,
May 15, 2019); see “Outdoor enthusiasts blast plan for 1,400 homes near Phoenix Sonoran
Preserve” (AZCentral, May 14, 2019).
Page 1163
Disclosing key materials on the same day as scheduled decision-making meetings
does not allow for meaningful public review and participation, and unfortunately, whether
or not intended, diminishes its importance. We sincerely hope that this will no longer be
the case moving forward.
III. CONCLUSION
The robust protections developed and codified in the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District have stood unaltered for the past 21 years. Erosion of these protections, if allowed
once, may not stop. Simply put, the Desert Maintenance Overlay District must be
preserved intact and not modified.
What we are asking for here is not radical. PMPC does not oppose a reasonable
development on the McEwen Ranch LLC property consistent with current development
standards and zoning requirements. Phoenix has already spoken with the approval of the
DMOD Overlay, which reflects the years of hard work put into development of the DMOD
Overlay by so many dedicated citizens and professionals.
Anything short of preserving the DMOD Overlay as-is will seriously degrade fragile
desert ecosystems in the area, sever connections between the Preserves, and set a
dangerous where developers can easily bypass important protections for our unique
landscapes across Phoenix.
Yours Truly,
Dr. Patrick McMullen, PhD, President
Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Email: pmpcaz@gmail.com
CC: Director, Phoenix City Planning & Development
Phoenix City Planning & Development Department (zoning@phoenix.gov)
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Executive Board, Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Page 1164
From: Sonoran Preserve
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Re: Message to VPC Members
Date: Thursday, April 7, 2022 3:43:19 PM
Hi Julianna,
I wanted to say thank you for all your assistance for the past couple years on this project. Obviously, I’m a bit
heartbroken and feel very gutted about the result of the vote, in particular the removal of the Desert Character
Overlay, something that I have felt so passionately about.
I was hoping to post a recap to our members again so if you could forward the minutes when you get a
chance that would be appreciated.
Also can you forward the below letter to Desert View VPC members:
Dear Desert View VPC,
First, I want to thank you for all your attention to the MacEwan 480/Verdin project over the past several
years. It’s hard to believe that we were discussing this case since 2018. It is taxing enough for me to sit in on
those meetings every once in a while and you fine people do it for our community once a month! So thank
you for your time and service.
Second, obviously I’m a bit heartbroken and feel very gutted over the result of the vote this week. I put so
much time and effort in defending the Preserve and it’s zoning laws.
It seemed that back in 2018 and 2019 everyone was in unison (both Committee members and 82 letters that
you received in opposition) about how massive this up zone was, the location of this up zone and the asking
of the removal of limit line and the Desert Character overlay. It was sad to see peoples opinions changes.
Perhaps we’re all tired of hearing about it.
At any rate, please consider me an ally in helping preserve open places like the Sonoran Preserve and it’s
zoning laws. For me it’s the heart of what make Arizona and our beautiful village truly unique.
Sincerely,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas
708-369-4566
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
On Apr 5, 2022, at 8:20 AM, Julianna Pierre wrote:
Thank you for sending this over, Gary. I’ll make sure I have this updated version available.
Thank you,
Julianna Pierre, Planner II – Village Planner
Office: 602-534-5829
ʇ Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix
Page 1165
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Verdin development proposal
Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 8:30:53 AM
Please add to the public record.
From: Ron Orozco
Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 8:25 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin development proposal
Dear Councilman Waring,
I’m writing to you today because I know you are a man of integrity and a man of the people. I had
the pleasure of meeting you a few times when you were the state senator from my district. I am
deeply concerned about the proposal Verdin development has on the table to basically ignore the
Desert Character Overlay District standards for development on lands adjoining the Sonoran
Preserve. This is literally my backyard now and the impact to the ecosystem of overdevelopment
would be irreversible. I am an avid trail runner with great respect for our desert home. This proposal
is a very bad idea and in direct conflict of the standards put in place to prevent overdevelopment. No
amount of ‘planning’ to build ‘conforming with the natural environment’ can make up for doubling
or tripling the number of homes in this area, and with future development almost assured, sets a
very bad precedent. In fact, it’s hypocritical. I urge you to do the right thing and deny this proposal.
Keep this area zoned as it was intended, and protect the environment and the livelihood of all who
currently live here and enjoy the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
Sincerely,
Ron Orozco
District 2 Republican
602-469-0715
Sent from my iPhone
*******
Page 1166
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 8
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-62-18-2 (Verdin PUD) (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-
2, and Z-TA-5-18-2)
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive
From: S-1 DCOD, RE-35 DCOD, and S-1
To: PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) and PUD
Acreage: 488.63
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow single-family residential
Applicant: Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 11/6/2018 Information only.
North Gateway 11/8/2018 Information only.
Desert View 4/2/2019 Information only.
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation with a modification.
Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation with modifications and additional
stipulations. Vote: 10-1.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff memo dated May 5, 2022.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve Z-62-18-2, per the staff
memo dated May 5, 2022.
Maker: Simon
Second: Busching
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The proposed PUD is located directly adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and includes
standards that ensure appropriate transitions from the development to adjacent
preserve areas.
Page 1167
2. The proposal balances the need for additional housing, while retaining and preserving
the desert landscape throughout the development, as outlined in the North Land Use
Plan and Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
3. The proposal includes several development standards, such as increased open edge
conditions, increased common area, and design guidelines that exceed conventional
Zoning Ordinance standards.
Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD reflecting
the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development Narrative
date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022, as modified by the following
stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO REFLECT A
MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND A MAXIMUM
OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES 6, 8, 26, AND 28:
REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM DENSITY TO 2.6
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO REMOVE
THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6, 8, 26, AND 28:
REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS TO
1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO REFLECT A
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED ALONG THE
EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. THE OPEN
SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” –
NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA WITH PLANT MATERIALS FROM THE
VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST: GREEN LIST. PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59,
63, 75, 134, 135, AND 136: REMOVE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL – SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT
COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL SHALL BE
UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE
WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 119,
AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED PLANT
PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123, SECTION
9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD LANGUAGE
REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A PROVISION
FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO
COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN SPACE.
Page 1168
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT
THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS
AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH
THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
h Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent and/or
d. temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT DENSITY
THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS FOR THE
ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT REFERS TO THE
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN SECTION 4.C.
(REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT PROHIBITED BY
CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO
HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE ALLOWED…”
l. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.3.A: ADD THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE UNDER THE
EXISTING SENTENCE: “ANY WALLS OR FENCING ALONG A PRESERVE
EDGE/MCFCD PROPERTY BOUNDARY, OTHER THAN WALLS OR
FENCING FOR INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS, SHALL BE COMPRISED
OF THE BARRIER FENCING TYPE, WHICH ARE DESIGNED WITH
SUFFICIENT OPENINGS TO ALLOW THE REGULAR PASSAGE OF
WILDLIFE.”
m. PAGE 42, SECTION 6.3.B: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO ‘A MAXIMUM 6-
FOOT, 4-INCH HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING” TO ‘A MAXIMUM 5-FOOT HIGH
FULL VIEW FENCING’.
n. PAGE 46, SECTION 6.6: CHANGE ‘14 FEET’ TO ‘12 FEET’.
l.o. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC TRAIL
ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE WASH
CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER STIPULATION
NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS
EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
p. PAGE 79-80, SECTION 5.A, LAST BULLET POINT: ADD THE FOLLOWING
AFTER THE FIRST SENTENCE: “THE USE OF RETAINING WALLS IN
EXCESS OF 4 FEET IS DISCOURAGED AND SHOULD BE LIMITED TO
Page 1169
LOCATIONS WHERE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE SPECIFIC SITE
TOPOGRAPHY.”
m.q. PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO THE YELLOW
LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
n.r. PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND ADD IT
TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
o.s. PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT. UPDATE
THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT
WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS
A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA.
p.t. PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. EXPLAIN THAT
THE AREA’S PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT PALETTE
GREEN LIST.
q.u. PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP MATRIX,
PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE AND
INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT WILLOW”
AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON PAGE 121.
r.v. PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP MATRIX,
PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE INFORMATION
REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF HACKBERRY” AND ADD
TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST ON PAGE 119.
s.w. PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT
FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING AND COPY IS 16
FEET…”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant analysis for
development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as 7th Street and
Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all additional dedications
and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District (PCD), of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water Design
Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping,
Page 1170
and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS
FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS
THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON
EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED BY THE PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL CONNECTIONS SHALL
BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE)
ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 429 OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS
WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE EROSION HAZARD
SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY
SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF
PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND
APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH TIMING
OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY THE
DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to clearing
and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the Phase I
9. data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified archaeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct
Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER SHALL
BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
Page 1171
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION
FILE FOR RECORD.
13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BY EMAIL A
MINIMUM OF 15 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN REVIEW
MEETINGS WITH THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
PLANNING HEARING OFFICER REQUESTS TO MODIFY STIPULATIONS, OR ANY
ZONING ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS. THE NOTICE SHALL INCLUDE THE DATE,
TIME, AND LOCATION OF THE MEETING/HEARING.
A. DR. GARY KIRKILAS: GARYKIRKILAS@GMAIL.COM
B. MEMBERS OF THE PHOENIX SONORAN PRESERVE AND MOUNTAIN
PARKS/PRESERVES COMMITTEE
C VASHTI “TICE” SUPPLEE: VSUPPLEE25@GMAIL.COM
14. APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CONDITIONED
UPON THE FINAL EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER WITHIN 24 MONTHS OF CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE OF ZONE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT SHALL BE EXECUTED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
AND ISSUANCE OF ANY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS. THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHALL AT A MINIMUM OUTLINE THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR INITIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO SONORAN DESERT DRIVE,
AS WELL AS FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ULTIMATE BUILDOUT OF
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 1172
ATTACHMENT I
To: City of Phoenix Planning Commission Date: May 5, 2022
From: Racelle Escolar, AICP
Principal Planner
Subject: ITEM NO. 8 (Z-62-18-2) – VERDIN PUD – SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
24TH STREET ALIGNMENT AND SONORAN DESERT DRIVE
The purpose of this is memo is to recommend additional stipulations and convey additional
correspondence that has been received regarding this case and its companion cases.
Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2 is a request to rezone 488.63 acres from S-1 DCOD
(Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), RE-35 (Single-Family
Residence District) DCOD, and S-1. The requested zoning is PUD (Planned Unit
Development) DCOD (Pending PUD) and PUD for the Verdin PUD, to allow single-
family residential.
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended approval with modifications by a 4-1 vote. The Desert View
VPC heard this request on April 5, 2022, and recommended approval with modifications
and additional stipulations by a 10-1 vote.
The applicant has agreed to reduce the maximum wall height standards in the PUD
Narrative and to require that any walls or fencing on the preserve edge have sufficient
openings to allow the passage of wildlife. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 1.l, m, n,
and p.
The applicant has also agreed to notifying specific individuals should there be future public
hearings applicable to the PUD area. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 13.
The Sonoran Desert Drive Roadway Corridor, including Sonoran Desert Drive from North
Valley Pkwy to Cave Creek Road and Dove Valley Road from 22nd Avenue to Sonoran
Desert Drive, will become a critical transportation conduit connecting northwest and
northeast Phoenix across the Sonoran Desert Preserve. Roadway improvements will be
needed within the corridor to ensure continued safe travel conditions as future new
development occurs in north Phoenix. Staff is recommending a stipulation to require a
development agreement that will set forth the terms by which Verdin will contribute a fair
share toward the necessary roadway improvements. This is addressed in Stipulation No.
14.
Enclosed with this memo are three letter of support and eight letters of opposition,
including a petition.
Page 1173
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
Staff recommends approval, subject to the stipulations below:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with
the Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3,
2022, as modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES
6, 8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
DENSITY TO 2.6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6,
8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
NUMBER OF UNITS TO 1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY
TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH
CORRIDOR. THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A
CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA
WITH PLANT MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST:
GREEN LIST. PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, AND
136: REMOVE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL – SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT
COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL
SHALL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO
THE WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED
PLANT PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123,
SECTION 9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD
LANGUAGE REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16
ACRES ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A
PROVISION FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE
DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN
SPACE.
Page 1174
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO
PATHS, PER STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL
SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL
ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
h Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
d. and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT
DENSITY THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS
FOR THE ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT
REFERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN
SECTION 4.C. (REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE
DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM
UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT
PROHIBITED BY CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY
ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE
ALLOWED…”
l. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.3.A: ADD THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE
UNDER THE EXISTING SENTENCE: “ANY WALLS OR FENCING
ALONG A PRESERVE EDGE/MCFCD PROPERTY BOUNDARY,
OTHER THAN WALLS OR FENCING FOR INDIVIDUAL
RESIDENTIAL LOTS, SHALL BE COMPRISED OF THE BARRIER
FENCING TYPE, WHICH ARE DESIGNED WITH SUFFICIENT
OPENINGS TO ALLOW THE REGULAR PASSAGE OF WILDLIFE.”
m. PAGE 42, SECTION 6.3.B: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO ‘A
MAXIMUM 6-FOOT, 4-INCH HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING” TO ‘A
MAXIMUM 5-FOOT HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING’.
n. PAGE 46, SECTION 6.6: CHANGE ‘14 FEET’ TO ‘12 FEET’.
l.o. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC
TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
Page 1175
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE
THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT
PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR
VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO
THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
p. PAGE 79-80, SECTION 5.A, LAST BULLET POINT: ADD THE
FOLLOWING AFTER THE FIRST SENTENCE: “THE USE OF
RETAINING WALLS IN EXCESS OF 4 FEET IS DISCOURAGED AND
SHOULD BE LIMITED TO LOCATIONS WHERE NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE SPECIFIC SITE TOPOGRAPHY.”
m.q. PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS –
DESERT WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO
THE YELLOW LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
n.r. PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND
ADD IT TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
o.s. PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT.
UPDATE THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE
TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” –
NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA.
p.t. PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. EXPLAIN
THAT THE AREA’S PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT
PALETTE GREEN LIST.
q.u. PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
AND INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON
PAGE 121.
r.v. PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
INFORMATION REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF
HACKBERRY” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST ON
PAGE 119.
s.w. PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM
HEIGHT FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING
AND COPY IS 16 FEET…”
Page 1176
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified
by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT
NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED
BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL
DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS
AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE
EROSION HAZARD SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH
Page 1177
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION
IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH
TIMING OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY
THE DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
9. Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.
13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BY
EMAIL A MINIMUM OF 15 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY PRELIMINARY SITE
PLAN REVIEW MEETINGS WITH THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, PLANNING HEARING OFFICER REQUESTS TO MODIFY
STIPULATIONS, OR ANY ZONING ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS. THE
NOTICE SHALL INCLUDE THE DATE, TIME AND LOCATION OF THE
MEETING/HEARING.
A. DR. GARY KIRKILAS: GARYKIRKILAS@GMAIL.COM
B. MEMBERS OF THE PHOENIX SONORAN PRESERVE AND
MOUNTAIN PARKS/PRESERVES COMMITTEE
C VASHTI “TICE” SUPPLEE: VSUPPLEE25@GMAIL.COM
14. APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE
CONDITIONED UPON THE FINAL EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT
Page 1178
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER WITHIN 24
MONTHS OF CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE OF
ZONE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE
EXECUTED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF
ANY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS. THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT SHALL AT A MINIMUM OUTLINE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
INITIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS WELL AS
FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ULTIMATE BUILDOUT OF
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTS.
Enclosures:
Correspondence (80 pages)
Page 1179
LW VENTURE, LLC
9393 N 90th St., Ste. 102, Box 125
Scottsdale, AZ 85258
Telephone (480) 305-4609
Cameron@mac-cre.com
April 27, 2022
Via Email : julianna.pierre@phoenix.gov
Ms. Julianna Pierre
City Village Planner
Re: Taylor Morrison Arizona, Inc.
Case Nos.: Z-62-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Z-TA-5-18-2 & Z-75-18-2
Dear Ms. Pierre:
As the new owner of Tatum Ranch Crossing, we support approval of the zoning changes
being requested by Taylor Morrison for the master planned residential community to be known
DV³9HUGLQ´
Please direct all future correspondence and/or notices to my email or physical address
mentioned above.
Sincerely,
LW Venture, LLC
An Arizona Limited Liability Company
By: NCW Property A, LLC,
Property Manager
_______________________________
Cameron Wilson
DCL/bgr
cc: Ellie Brundige
Gammage & Burnham, P.L.C.
Email: ebrundige@gblaw.com
Page 1180
From: PDD Zoning
To: Racelle Escolar
Cc: Julianna Pierre; Sarah Stockham; Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: FW: PMPC letters regarding Verdin zoning
Date: Monday, May 2, 2022 3:57:42 PM
Attachments: PMPC Cover Letter_Legal Research on DCOD_April 3 2022 (004).pdf
PMPC Letter to City of Phoenix re VERDIN Applications_Final Draft (004).pdf
Hello see below and attached.
Thank You
Leonor Valenzuela Secretary III
Planning and Development - Zoning Section
200 West Washington Street 2nd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: libby@fivewest.com
Sent: May 2, 2022 3:03 PM
To: Alan Stephenson; Sandra Hoffman
; PDD Zoning ; Jason Blakley
; Joshua Bednarek
Subject: PMPC letters regarding Verdin zoning
Our attached letters from Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council (PMPC) relate to the zoning
change request regarding the Verdin development.
Elizabeth (Libby) Goff
PMPC Secretary
Libby@fivewest.com
602-758-3062
Page 1181
PMPC SUMMARY - APRIL 3, 2022
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization charged
with the protection of the Phoenix Mountains Preserves write to you with our strong
support and encouragement to engage and monitor the Verdin Development of the 480
acres situated to the west of Cave Creek Wash and to the south of the Sonoran Parkway.
The Verdin location abuts to Sonoran Preserve.
The attached legal research conducted by the PMPC Attorney, lists our concerns and we
hope that you and City departments will continue to take them seriously and will apply the
sections of the zoning Ordinance that were written and included into the Ordinance to
protect these Preserve adjacencies and to ensure that the Preserves will remain available
to the public and enjoyable as well.
PMPC understands that Phoenix is a rapidly growing city and that large numbers of the
new population must be accommodated. A great effort was undertaken in past decades
to have the Sonoran Preserve acquired by the City at tax payer expense, with a large
effort by PMPC to identify and help to support the City efforts. We therefore are very
dedicated to keeping the Preserves available to the local citizens, and the Desert
Character Overlay continued and appreciated.
The Verdin Development planning team has taken important steps in the linking up of the
Sonoran Preserves, emphasis on desert plant maintenance, protection of plants and
animals, and meaningful public access to the Desert Preserves surrounding the new
Verdin development. What is needed is a more formal arrangement between the City of
Phoenix, Phoenix Citizens and the Verdin 480 Acre Development project team.
As a remembrance; On February 17, 1998, the [City] Council also voted unanimously to
adopt the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan and to move forward in acquiring this open
space. In doing so, the Council continues a time-honored precedent for protecting and
preserving desert open space within the city and for ensuring recreational access for our
citizens.”
PMPC is intensely interested in the pending development of the Verdin 480 acre site, as
it is an early project in the development of this corridor, and especially important for the
continued Desert character Overlay District enforcement.
Sincerely,
Patrick McMullen, PhD
Patrick McMullen, PhD
PMPC President
Page 1182
March 31, 2022
Mayor Kate Gallego Phoenix City Councilmembers
Phoenix City Hall Phoenix City Hall
200 W. Washington St. 200 W. Washington St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003 Phoenix, AZ 85003
Re: Objections of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. (PMPC) to
the Four Applications Submitted for “Verdin” Development Proposal (GPA-
DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2 and Z-62-18-2)
Dear Mayor Gallego:
This letter is submitted by the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc.
(PMPC) in opposition to the proposed Taylor Morrison “Verdin” housing development
project south of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th Street and 32nd Street alignments,
just west of Cave Creek Road in northern Phoenix (formerly “MacEwen 480”). We
understand that developer Taylor Morrison has filed several applications in furtherance
of this development including two zoning amendments, a General Plan Amendment, and
a Planned Unit Development application (hereinafter the “four applications”). 1 We
understand that these four applications were simultaneously approved by the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee on March 10, 2022 2, and the Desert View Village
Planning Committee is scheduled to meet on these four applications on April 5, 2022. 3
PMPC strongly objects to any actions, at any level, that would advance the four
applications as written, for reasons stated herein. First – the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District should not be modified but must remain intact, ensuring that washes, sensitive
species and their habitats, and the delicate desert ecosystem remain protected. The
rezoning is not simply a “technical clean-up” as the developer casually asserts, 4 but
rather, this rezoning would be an unprecedented rollback of protections carefully
researched and thoughtfully added to the Phoenix Zoning Code for this specific area
decades ago – protections that were specifically adopted to protect this desert area from
the very type of development pressure that is presented here. Second – simultaneous
consideration and approval of these four applications is contrary to the law and City of
Phoenix policy. Furthermore, public notice has been deficient.
General Plan Amendment (GPA-DSTV-1-18-2); Zoning Amendments (Z-75-18-2 and Z-75-5-
18); and Planned Unit Development (Z-62-18-2).
See Notice of Results, North Gateway Village Planning Committee Meeting (March 10, 2022).
See Notice of Public Meeting, Desert View Village Planning Committee (April 5, 2022).
See Letter re Z-75-18-2 Zoning Map Amendment (December 17, 2021), p.2
Page 1183
On behalf of PMPC, I ask that these applications not be approved as written but
that the Desert Maintenance Overlay District remain wholly intact, ensuring that
protections to washes, sensitive species and their habitats, and the delicate desert
ecosystem remain as intended.
About PMPC
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. is an organization founded in
1970 by Arizona visionaries dedicated to the protection of Phoenix’s Mountain Preserve
system. For the last 50 years, PMPC and its members have worked tirelessly to preserve,
protect, and advocate for the precious Mountain Preserve system, and to monitor and
address the rapid growth and development surrounding these important public resources.
For much of Phoenix’s modern history, our PMPC membership has worked hard
alongside hundreds of concerned Phoenix citizens and City staff to ensure that the
Sonoran Desert Preserves are protected and maintained as a valuable resource for all
citizens of Phoenix.
I. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District Must Not Be Altered
For many decades, protecting and preserving the unique desert features of the
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and the surrounding area has been a priority for the City of
Phoenix. The PMPC and its members were involved in and supported the development
and adoption of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (“DMOD” or “DMOD Overlay”)
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance in 2001, and the related working groups and
charettes involved with that process, as well as the formation and expansion of the
Phoenix Mountain Preserves. We support the critical protections carefully enacted by the
outlined in the DMOD Overlay, which must remain intact.
The true history of how the DMOD Overlay was developed is compelling. It is a
landmark instance of how land planning and landscape ecological principles can be
integrated as part of policy drafting processes. It should be a point of pride for the City of
Phoenix, and an asset worth protecting. Furthermore, the history shows that the DMOD
Overlay area and its boundaries were not simply dictated by road alignments (as the
developer incorrectly claims), but instead were carefully studied and thoughtfully drafted
in a manner integrating ecological considerations with planning structure, as part of one
of the most robust and widely supported Phoenix endeavors, to date. Finally, the owner(s)
of the “Verdin” property have owned this land for at least the last half-century, and have
had ample time and opportunities to challenge its classification over the last several
decades. The DMOD Overlay must not be altered.
Page 1184
History of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (DMOD)
On July 5, 2001, the approximately 6,724-acre DMOD was added to the Phoenix City
Zoning Ordinance at Section 653 (Sub-Districts A & B), shown on the following page. 5
It was carefully constructed by a large, interdisciplinary collaborative effort over
several years to study and understand the unique and sensitive characteristics of this
area, and protect those characteristics from the pressures of development. Historical city
documents and studies, reports, articles, and other research materials describe this
history, as summarized below.
1980s
On January 19, 1985, a large portion of northern Phoenix (including the current
DMOD Overlay area) was annexed into the city. 6 Tensions between increasing
development and impacts on sensitive desert areas were rising during this time. Spurred
in part by these tensions and concerns over the proposed development at Tatum Ranch, 7
the City Council developed a plan for this larger area, then called the peripheral Areas C
and D Areas, with “extensive” community assistance from a Council-appointed Citizen’s
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts).
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 4; see also City of Phoenix Annexation Map.
See Quay, Ray. “Bridging the Gap Between Ecological Research and Land Use Policy: The
North Sonoran Collaborative” Urban Ecosystems, 7:283-294 (2004). Tatum Ranch was one of
the first developments to use groundwater and wastewater, opening the doors for more
development north of the CAP canal.
Page 1185
Advisory Committee, as well as support from the State. 8 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan
was adopted in 1987.
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was intended to direct the City of Phoenix on
future land use and development densities “to ensure that development in the area was
compatible with and complementary to the unique and environmentally sensitive
characteristics of the area.” 9 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan describes this new
proactive approach: “Normally, the City is placed in a reactive role with respect to guiding
growth of a developing area. These northern areas; however, are largely undeveloped
and provide the City with a unique opportunity to anticipate growth and to establish an
overall framework to guide physical development.”10 Even at the time, the City recognized
that more work would be needed towards developing future protections, such as an
ordinance. 11
1990s
Development continued to increase in northern Phoenix during the early 1990s.
Subsequently, concerns about density and form of development within the ecologically
sensitive desert areas came to a critical point. A diverse group of public and private
planners, designers, environmental scientists, landscape architects, university
departments, as well as representatives from state agencies, private consultants, the City
of Phoenix, and State of Arizona began collaborating on a variety of studies, plans, and
charrettes for this area during this time. 12 This group (called the North Sonoran
Collaborative), formed and met regularly to address the gap between managing growth
and the ecological data needed to accomplish these goals. Their research was organized
into a multi-disciplinary GIS database, 13 one of the early instances of GIS usage by the
city and significant part of the group’s success.
The City of Phoenix began the process of revising the General Plan with detailed
objectives and design standards for this area during this time. The absence of ecological
See General Plan: Peripheral Areas C and D, City of Phoenix Planning Department, October
1987.
See City of Phoenix Planning Department Staff Report No. 58-01-02 (June 13, 2001),
recommending approval of the DMOD Overlay, at 2. Obtained via Public Records Request.
See FN 8 at 1.
See FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9 (p.2); see also FN 7; see also “ASU Program Stresses Ecological Approach to City
Planning”, University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center Newsletter, November-
December 1999, at 9.
See Ward, B., Burke, J., Ewan, J., Fish Ewan, R., Miller, W., Quay, R., Steiner, F. 1999. “A
Collaborative Approach to Planning.” ASU School of Planning & Landscape Architecture.
Page 1186
information about the Northern Sonoran Desert was quickly recognized as a major
barrier, 14 so the City turned to the North Sonoran Collaborative and Arizona State
University (ASU) School of Planning and Landscape Architecture to conduct this much-
needed work. The city funded a detailed study of the Cave Creek Wash by ASU, the
success of which led to several additional studies of other nearby washes. 15 The Cave
Creek Study also helped build momentum for the acquisition of 15,000 acres of Preserve
lands including along the Cave Creek Wash corridor.
As a result of these extensive studies, a radical departure in methodology was
forming. “Basing preservation boundaries on ecosystems rather than topography or land
ownership is new to Phoenix. In the past, boundaries did not reflect the ecological
systems inherent in the landscape and so the impact of preserve size, shape, and
constitution on plant and wildlife habitats were not considered nor well understood.” 16
These and other processes led directly to the North Land Use Plan (adopted 1996)
and the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (adopted 1998). Based in part on interviews with
neighbors in the area, the North Land Use Plan identified three Character Areas – the
Desert Preserve (today’s DMOD Overlay), the Rural Desert, and Suburban Desert – and
required that zoning overlay districts be created for each area “to provide clear
development standards which reflect community desires for each area.” 17
It is worth highlighting that the Desert Overlay development process was so unique
and ambitious that an entire session series of presentations were devoted to it at the 1999
American Planning Association’s National Conference held in Seattle, Washington. 18
Presenters included ASU professors, City of Phoenix Planning Deputy Director James
Burke, Assistant Director Ray Quay (all Collaborative members) who traveled from
Arizona to Washington to present their work to planners across the United States.
In a conference paper presented to planners nationwide, Terry Newton of the
Phoenix Planning Department noted that “the process for developing the three overlay
See FN 8.
This study was reportedly conducted by a team of ecologists and biologists from the ASU
Schools of Planning and Landscape Architecture and Life Sciences Department, Northern
Arizona University, the Desert Botanical Gardens, and the Arizona Game and Fish Department.
Their report on the biological values of Cave Creek Wash entitled “Cave Creek Wash:
Preservation Boundary Study” was published in 1996.
See Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (1998), at 16.
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 19.
See 1999 APA National Planning Conference file (WorldCat record); see 1999 APA National
Planning Conference Table of Contents (see Session Series on The North Sonoran Collaborative,
five papers linked).
Page 1187
ordinances is unlike any the city has undertaken in the past.” He continued, saying that
these guidelines could “set a new standard for the city’s approach to development in
natural desert areas for the city.” 19 He further described the specific acreage targeted for
protection:
“Much of the area identified by Subdistricts A and B is included in the
Arizona Preserve Initiative (API) application which is currently being
pursued by the city. Of the approximately 5,000 acres identified as
Subdistrict A, only 900 acres are outside of the API area. Subdistrict B
consists of approximately 1,700 acres with 1,500 acres falling outside of the
API area. Assuming the API area as currently identified successfully
becomes a preserve, approximately 2,400 acres in Subdistricts A and B
would remain for possible development. This is the area addressed by
this Overlay.” (Emphasis Added).
For reference, the current proposed rezoning applications submitted by developer
Taylor Morrison propose to remove approximately 218 acres of the 900 acres of
developable non-Preserve area from Subdistrict A, or about 24%. 20 While the number of
developable acreages may have shifted since this time, it is crucial to note that the
Overlay was developed to specifically target these developable acreages for protection
from intense development – including the intense residential development presented by
the “Verdin” project.
2000s
On June 13, 2001, the City Planning Commission met to consider and recommend
adoption of the DMOD Overlay to the City Council. On June 27, 2001, the City of Phoenix
granted the request as recommended, adopting the DMOD Overlay into the City Zoning
Ordinance. 21 Minutes from the June 13th Planning Commission hearing reveal the robust
community input and public involvement that supported writing the DMOD Overlay text. 22
Staff Report No. 58-01-2 23 recommending approval states:
See Newton, Terry, City of Phoenix Planning Department. Desert Character Overlay Zoning
District, Conference Paper presented to the American Planning Association, Seattle, WA. 1999.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 (March 9, 2022) at 12.
See FN 9. See also Application No. Z-TA-3-99-2 (to add the Desert Character Overlay District
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance); see Zoning Application No. Z-58-01-2 (establish the
Desert Maintenance Overlay District, one of three character districts authorized under Section
653); see Ordinance No. G-4380 and RCA35880 dated July 5, 2001 (adopting Ordinance).
See City of Phoenix Planning Commission Minutes (June 13, 2001) at 62; see also FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9.
Page 1188
“The area has a high scenic value containing stands of dense native
vegetation, which support a delicate and fragile eco-system. Within the
proposed overlay is Cave Creek Wash, a unique wash system which is
designated for incorporation into the City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. The
Desert Maintenance District is intended to provide a buffer/transition
between this environmentally sensitive area and existing
development. This is an area with many washes of varying size which are
tributaries to Cave Creek Wash. It is an area of high habitat value that is
critical to the survival of numerous small mammals and a variety of
birds, as well as reptiles. Maintenance of the Sonoran Desert in this
area requires sensitive development strategies.”
2001), recommending approval of Z-58-01-2 and Z-TA-3-99-2. (Emphasis
added).
The DMOD Overlay was codified in the Zoning Ordinance at Section 653. Within
its very first paragraph: “The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development.” 24
The DMOD Overlay is split into Subdistricts A and B. Subdistrict A requires
minimum lot sizes of 35,000 square feet or greater, or 0-1.2 dwelling units per acre. 25
Subdistrict B requires minimum lot sizes of 18,000 square feet or greater, or 2-5 dwelling
units per acre. 26 Section 653(A) explains why development densities are more restrictive
in Subdistrict A (where a portion of the proposed “Verdin” project lies and which is the
subject of the rezoning applications) as follows:
“With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and
intensity of residential development characterize this area. The
Desert Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with
regards to density allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the
fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low density development which may
be sited in clusters along with provision for an area to allow access to the
Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of development in this
See FN 5 at Section (A).
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(5); see also FN 9 at 3.
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(6); see also FN 9 at 3.
Page 1189
area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas and washes
becomes possible.”
The DMOD Overlay is the only one of these three overlays completed to date. For
reasons not stated, the remaining two Desert Character Overlay Districts (Rural Desert
Overlay, Sec. 653(C) and the Suburban Desert Overlay, Sec. 653(D)) were never added
to the Desert Character Overlay District (Sec. 653), but have remained “Reserved” for the
past two decades. 27
While development has continued throughout the city, the thoughtfully formulated
Overlay at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance has stood the test of time. Since adoption
in 2001, it has never been amended. However, granting the rezoning proposed by the
Taylor Morrison “Verdin” development to lift the DMOD Overlay will set a disastrous
precedent, allowing a developer to carve themselves out of the protective, robust Overlay
to facilitate their more dense (and thus more profitable) development plans. Removal of
these protections sets a chilling precedent for the survival of Sonoran Preserve and the
remaining acres of sensitive desert habitat and wash systems. The “Verdin” project
should not be exempted from the protective DMOD Overlay.
The “Technical Clean-Up” Road Alignment Argument Is Wrong
In a transparent effort to side step the powerful history and compelling reasoning
behind the Overlay, the developer claims that the requested rezonings (Z-75-18-2 and Z-
TA-5-18-2) to remove the DMOD Overlay from their property are just a “technical clean
ups” 28 to change the Overlay boundaries to align with Sonoran Desert Drive instead with
the Northeast Outer Loop alignment contemplated in the Peripheral Areas C & D Plan.
This is not true. The DMOD Overlay was never intended to move with any changes to the
proposed roadway.
The Sonoran Preserve Parkway route alignment involved a complex process that
included area residents, PMPC, the State Land Department, and Preserve and Parks
Committee study partners studying multiple alternatives. 29 After extensive public review,
one alignment was selected out of five. During a presentation to the Parks & Recreation
Board meeting, it was discussed that the selected Parkway alignment was chosen to
maintain existing wildlife corridors in the area, among other things. At the meeting Board
Chairperson Jim Holway asked “if there was a reason why the alignment had not been
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts), Subsections C & D.
See Letter from Susan Demmitt to Desert View Village Planner Julianna Pierre re Zoning Map
Amendment application Z-75-18-2 (December 17, 2021). Received via Public Records Request.
See Sonoran Desert Drive Alignment Study Fact Sheet.
Page 1190
brought to the edge of the preserve.” Staff and Parks & Preserve Administrator Sarah Hall
explained that this was due to “major wash crossings” in the area, among other things. 30
A City Council Report recommending approval of the final Sonoran Parkway
alignment similarly states: “Special care was taken to maintain views of the surrounding
terrain, minimize scarring, preserve existing vegetation, and provide for wildlife crossings.
Provisions for future trail crossings have been incorporated and structure designs include
aesthetic treatment with native colors and textures to blend into the adjacent desert
landscape. Segments of the alignment will abut future Mountain Preserve and serve as a
buffer between the Mountain Preserve and adjacent development.”31
Never, in any part of the extensive Sonoran Parkway alignment review process,
was there ever a mention that the new alignment was intended to redraw the boundary
of the recently-adopted DMOD Overlay. Rather, the Sonoran Parkway alignment was not
intended to redraw the DMOD Overlay, it was intended to traverse it. The alignment was
specifically chosen to be harmonious with sensitive ecological features, not to pull back
protections for these features as the developer seems to suggest now.
Even the City of Phoenix 32 appears to reject the developer’s “technical clean-up”
roadway claim. Below (left) is the applicant’s proposed rezoning, reducing the DMOD
Overlay over a large swath. Below (right) is the City’s proposed modification, which
exempts just the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay. Plainly, from these maps, the
“technical clean-up” roadway claim does not stand.
See Phoenix Parks & Recreation Board Meeting Minutes (June 26, 2003) at 9-10.
See City Council Report, Transportation, Parks & Seniors Subcommittee (June 8, 2006).
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
Page 1191
The proposed “Verdin” project lie underneath Mesquite Wash, an important habitat
for many desert species, which runs through the heart of the property. Removal of the
DMOD Overlay would entirely remove the protections to Mesquite Wash. The “Verdin”
project would also intrude on Cave Creek Wash to the east, an important wildlife corridor
between the existing Preserve lands located to the north and south. A development more
dense than currently allowed would threaten the integrity and cut off connectivity of these
wildlife corridors. Indeed, one of the smallest birds native to the Sonoran Desert known
as the “Verdin” makes its home in wildlife corridors and washes including those that
would be threatened by the proposed “Verdin” development.
A blatant carve-out of the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay to enable
more dense development is inappropriate. This flies in the face of so many years of hard
work, thoughtful community input and public review, careful research, and proactive good
planning. It is directly contrary to the intent of the DMOD Overlay, which exists to
proactively protect the sensitive desert ecosystem from developmental pressures, not
react to their desires. It also sets an awful precedent, opening the doors for future
developers to make similar requests, rendering the DMOD Overlay effectively
meaningless.
II. ISSUES REGARDING PROCESS
Simultaneous Consideration of All Cases Is Not Permitted
These four applications were simultaneously presented on, discussed, and
approved for recommendation through a vote by the North Gateway Village Planning
Committee on March 10, 2022. 33 The Desert View Village Planning Committee is
scheduled to meet and take action on these “companion cases” on April 5, 2022. 34 This
is not permitted under City of Phoenix processes and the law.
The City of Phoenix’s General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide 35 notes
that simultaneous review of rezoning applications and requests to amend the General
Plan is prohibited. It specifically states:
May my rezoning application be reviewed simultaneously with my
application to amend the GENERAL PLAN?
No. Current City policy requires that action on a rezoning application is
separate from the procedure to amend the General Plan as State law
requires that all rezoning be consistent with and conform to the adopted
See FN 2.
See FN 3.
See City of Phoenix General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide (rev. 08/12/2021)
Page 1192
General Plan. A hearing on the rezoning application is to occur subsequent
to a determination on the change to the General Plan. However, you may
file your rezoning application and be scheduled for a hearing agenda
following action on the General Plan amendment. Note: This requirement
can be waived by the Planning and Development Director upon written
request for special circumstances.
General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide, at p.2
A.R.S. § 9-462.01(F) states in relevant part that “[a]ll zoning and rezoning
ordinances adopted under this article shall be consistent with and conform to the adopted
general plan of the municipality”. It is the intent of the Legislature that revisions to the
General Plan must occur prior to, not simultaneous with, zoning and rezonings. This is an
important process as it protects the integrity of the General Plan and the processes
involved in its revision, including (but not at all limited to), ongoing public notice and
participation.
Exceptions to this requirement have not occurred and do not apply here.
Scheduling of a hearing agenda following action on the General Plan is not occurring
here, as the Verdin Minor General Plan Amendment Submittal (Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2) admits that “[t]his Amendment is being processed concurrently with applications to
change the zoning on the Property…” 36 Finally, there has been no indication that
developer Taylor Morrison has ever requested a written waiver of this explicit
requirement.
In addition, the General Plan Amendment Planning Process makes clear that the
contents of a General Plan Amendment hearing and a Rezoning hearing are quite
different. 37 For instance, certain zoning issues are “not appropriate for discussion” at a
General Plan Amendment hearing, including setbacks, elevation, open space, amenities,
and other topics. Simultaneous consideration of all of these applications, and
consideration of all of these topics at one single hearing, is inappropriate and contrary to
Phoenix City policies and Arizona laws governing municipal planning.
All Procedures for the Cases Must Be Complied With
On December 7, 2021 and December 9, 2021, the four applications were
presented and discussed at the Desert View Village Planning Committee and the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee regular monthly meetings, respectively. 38 On
See Verdin Major General Plan Amendment Submittal (December 17, 2021), p.5 (obtained via
public records request).
See FN 34 at 2-3.
See Desert View Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 7, 2021); see
North Gateway Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 9, 2021).
Page 1193
December 17, 2021 and after these informational meetings, the General Plan
Amendment Application was resubmitted to the Planning & Development Department (the
first submittal having occurred over three years prior). 39 However, no further presentation
and discussion of this resubmittal occurred prior to voting meetings.
Neighborhood notification and meetings are also a requirement of the General
Plan Amendment process. Specifically, applicants are required to meet with property
owners within 600 feet of the subject site to present the proposal, and attempt to address
resident concerns. Furthermore, the General Plan Amendment Process Guide 40 requires:
“The results of that meeting shall be summarized and forwarded to the
village planner in whose village the case is located. No hearings shall be
scheduled without submittal of the following information:
• Date, time, and location of the meeting
• Number of participants
• Issues that arose during the meeting
• Plan to resolve the issues, if possible”
It is unclear whether this requirement has been met. Furthermore, if such a
meeting has occurred, it is important to determine whether the meeting occurred prior or
subsequent to the major resubmittal in December 2021. This is critical. Fundamental to
the planning process are ample, advance public notice allowing time for meaningful
review, engagement and participation.
For reasons stated above, the bundling of these four cases (rezoning applications,
request to amend the General Plan, and Planned Unit Development) is improper and
prohibited by the City of Phoenix’s own policy. Progression of these cases must stop on
this basis alone.
Public Review Opportunities Have Been Insufficient
The City of Phoenix Staff Report for Verdin PUD was not finalized until March 9,
2022, and was not posted on the Planned Unit Development Case List until just before
the North Gateway Village Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 41
Similarly, the City of Phoenix Staff Analysis for the General Plan Amendment was not
finalized until March 9, 2022. 42 Bafflingly, it is posted on the General Plan Amendment
See FN 35.
See FN 34.
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
See Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
Page 1194
Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022”, making it highly unlikely that an
interested citizen would easily be able to locate and review it (if they even knew it was
there). The City of Phoenix Staff Report for the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment was
also not finalized until March 9, 2022. 43 Also bafflingly, it is posted on the Rezoning &
Text Amendment Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022.” This stymies the
good-faith efforts of even the most persistent interested citizen, and certainly stifles public
participation.
Additionally, revisions to the Verdin PUD Narrative have repeatedly been
resubmitted by developer Taylor Morrison over the past three months. The most recent
resubmission was on March 3, 2022, a few short days before the North Gateway Village
Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 44 No notification of this updated
draft (or the specific changes it contains) was received in advance of the March 10th
meeting.
No notification or alert was ever received that these reports or updates were even
available, leaving no time for any meaningful public review (or even awareness of their
existence) prior to the first Village voting meeting. This is made more egregious by the
fact that there are significant public concerns with this development, which have been
repeatedly raised throughout the years. In fact, public concern about this project has been
expressed since the project was first proposed as “MacEwen 480” in 2018. 45 As the City
is likely aware, the organization known as Save Our Sonoran Preserve was formed by
residents in response to these very threats from this project and SOS has fiercely
advocated for protection of the Preserve and DMOD Overlay ever since.
Although the Public Meeting materials included allotted time for “Public
Comments”, this opportunity is not meaningful, when the public is not given sufficient time
to review the relevant documents in advance of key voting meetings. Proper time for
public participation and notice are required components of the public process for all of
these cases. As you know, A.R.S. § 9-461.06(C) directs municipalities to provide for
“effective, early and continuous public participation” with respect to General Plan
amendment processes.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
See Verdin PUD Narrative.
See “1,420 homes may line 9,671 acres of preserved north Phoenix desert” (AZCentral,
January 12, 2022); see “Hikers upset home builder may redevelop part of North Phoenix desert”
(AZFamily, February 28, 2022); see “Preserve at odds with high density housing” (Sonoran News,
May 15, 2019); see “Outdoor enthusiasts blast plan for 1,400 homes near Phoenix Sonoran
Preserve” (AZCentral, May 14, 2019).
Page 1195
Disclosing key materials on the same day as scheduled decision-making meetings
does not allow for meaningful public review and participation, and unfortunately, whether
or not intended, diminishes its importance. We sincerely hope that this will no longer be
the case moving forward.
III. CONCLUSION
The robust protections developed and codified in the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District have stood unaltered for the past 21 years. Erosion of these protections, if allowed
once, may not stop. Simply put, the Desert Maintenance Overlay District must be
preserved intact and not modified.
What we are asking for here is not radical. PMPC does not oppose a reasonable
development on the McEwen Ranch LLC property consistent with current development
standards and zoning requirements. Phoenix has already spoken with the approval of the
DMOD Overlay, which reflects the years of hard work put into development of the DMOD
Overlay by so many dedicated citizens and professionals.
Anything short of preserving the DMOD Overlay as-is will seriously degrade fragile
desert ecosystems in the area, sever connections between the Preserves, and set a
dangerous precedence where developers can easily bypass important protections for our
unique landscapes across Phoenix.
Yours Truly,
Patrick McMullen
Dr. Patrick McMullen, PhD, President
Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Email: pmpcaz@gmail.com
CC: Director, Phoenix City Planning & Development
Phoenix City Planning & Development Department (zoning@phoenix.gov)
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Executive Board, Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Page 1196
REFERENCE: Z-62-18-2 Verdin PUD
TO: Phoenix Planning and Zoning Commission
I am a 30+ year resident of Phoenix and actively involved in the preservation and wise management
of our Mountain Preserves. I wish to compliment the work of the Planning and Zoning Department
staff in facilitating a robust public process that spanned the years of Covid-19 restrictions.
I want to publically acknowledge and thank the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council and the
Save Our Sonoran Desert coalition for their steadfast attention to this zoning case. Particularly the
purpose of the Desert Character Overlay Zone in protecting the Cave Creek Wash, an important
native desert asset for wildlife and Sonoran desert plants. Without their persistent voices the
opportunity to meet with the developers and have a productive conversation may never have
happened.
I submitted earlier comments prior to the Village Planning Committee meetings as follows:
STIP #1: Public trail access easements, as approved by the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department, shall be provided for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail, and the Community Paseo
Paths that provide a connection to future trail connections to the Sonoran Preserve as identified on
the Verdin Pedestrian Circulation plan dated June 3, 2019 included within the Verdin PUD, to ensure
permanent public access through the Verdin community to the Sonoran Preserve. The public access
shall be designed in a way to restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access, as approved by Parks. The
specific location, design and timing of construction of the public trail connections shall be
coordinated with and approved by the Parks and Recreation Department.
STIP #2: A minimum 25 foot open space tract shall be provided along the eastern boundary of the
Verdin property to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor. The open space tract shall
be considered a Certified Area Type “B” – Natural Revegetated Area with plant material from the
Approved Plant List: Green List.
I am pleased to see these recommendations added to the stipulations of this PUD. I do want to
stress the importance of making sure public access designations are part of zoning approvals. Verbal
commitments are often lost over time as land ownership and management changes through the
decades. I also hope that Phoenix Planning and Zoning will view this PUD as the example for the
inevitable development of surrounding State Trust Lands that are not included in the Desert
Character Overlay and have adjacency to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation
Area.
Yours in Conservation,
Vashti “Tice” Supplee
918 W. Roosevelt Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Vsupplee25@gmail.com
602-380-3722
Page 1197
Racelle Escolar
From: Eric Idalski
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 2:15 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Sonoran Preserve concerns
Mr. Nico Howard,
I am writing to advise of my concern related to the proposed changes that would affect the Sonoran Preserve and surrounding
communities.
I am an avid user of the Sonoran Preserve as well as a volunteer park steward. I feel that the increased traffic volume that
would come on Sonoran Desert Drive is dangerous. Today I nearly witnessed a horrible accident as a young family was
crossing the road and vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed nearly hit them. I cant imagine double or triple the traffic as this
area already carries more traffic than is compatible with safe, enjoyable cycling and hiking. I also live just south of the road
and the additional road noise that will come with this is disturbing for current residents such as myself as well as the impact of
the noise in the preserve.
In addition, I am concerned with the overall impact on wildlife. We have already seen a loss of habitat for wildlife such as
owls and dessert tortoise that I see on occasion in between the north and south preserves. I will unfortunately be traveling for
business the week of the next hearing but hope that my concerns are heard.
Please help maintain the area and protect the preserve that so many have grown to love and enjoy and avoid detracting from
the tranquility treasured by trail users and visitors.
Kind Regards,
Eric Idalski
480-363-8735
Page11198
Racelle Escolar
From: Joyce A Lefler
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 3:05 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com; Joyce A lefler
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Please do NOT allow any more encroachment of houses or traffic or businesses in or near our Sonoran Preserve!
My husband and I are retired and years ago we sunk everything we have into our house near the preserve BECAUSE of the
quiet, peace, and hiking & biking trails of the preserve. This became our little piece of heaven while still being in the big city.
Please do not destroy this by allowing the preserve to be overbuilt. We enjoy the owls, bobcats, coyotes and javelinas who live
here. More traffic, more people and more houses will destroy their ability to live here, also.
Please do NOT allow our preserve to be slowly destroyed.
Joyce A Lefler
Joyce A Lefler, BSN, RTS, RNC‐OB (retired),
author of From Miracle to Murder: Justice for Adam
http://bit.ly/MiracletoMurder [bit.ly]
Page11199
Racelle Escolar
From: Sue Pierce
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 1:58 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Sue Pierce
Subject: Verdun Development Along Sonoran Desert Drive
Dear Planning Commissioners,
Please accept my comments in opposition to the Verdun request to remove the Desert Character Overlay
along Sonoran Desert Drive.
I am a citizen of Phoenix, AZ and a resident who lives in a community along Dove Valley Road (Desert Enclave).
The rapid growth in the 85085‐zip code (and others in Phoenix) is a mixed blessing. We appreciate the job
growth, hundreds of new apartments and housing units, new retail stores, restaurants, commercial/industrial
development, and growth in tax revenues for the City and State. All important.
However, the growth comes with problems, too, that to date, no one has addressed adequately. Here are
concerns we have voiced for the last two years and that I want you to be aware of:
Roads not built to handle the increased traffic with no specific timeline for mitigation. The extra
turning lanes Verdun is proposing, and a possible traffic signal are simply Band‐Aids ‐ not solutions.
This creates serious safety issues for those living in the area and using the Preserve.
Desert Enclave residents not able to exit their development onto Dove Valley Road during morning and
afternoon rush hour. This will become worse with dense housing along Sonoran Desert Drive.
Biking lanes created along Sonoran Desert Drive no longer safe to use as trucks, trailers and cars travel
at 60 ‐ 80 miles/hour along the road.
Trash and debris are thrown along the roadway, including discarded metal, containers, etc. as traffic
increases. And yes, several of us walk the road to pick up what we can. However, there is just too much
for us to handle.
Increased traffic creates noise pollution that makes hiking trails at Apache Wash Trailhead less of a
respite from the busyness of the city. I hike with my noise cancelling headset on to block some of
it. Hiking the trails such as Ridgeback rarely am I able to get away from the site of houses or away from
the noise of the already overly busy road.
There are so many more concerns: water access(our HOA was told to reduce water use by 20%),
wildlife refuge issues, flooding along the washes and the fact that the City of Phoenix invested millions
into the creation of a beautiful preserve and roadway with paved trails and beautiful bridges. And now
what will come of that investment.
Please keep the Desert Character Overlay in place. Allow wise growth in the area near Apache Wash Trailhead.
Protect the Preserve as a wonderful urban haven for everyone to use as their escape from the city to the
desert.
Thank you,
Sue
Sue Pierce
Page11200
Racelle Escolar
From: Sonoran Preserve
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 11:58 AM
To: Racelle Escolar; PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve Official Statement on Verdin Rezone
Attachments: Planning Commission Comments Attachment.pdf
Dear Chair Howard & Members of the Phoenix City Planning Commission,
The following comments are submitted on behalf of Save Our Sonoran Preserve [supportpubliclands.com] and the nearly
1,000 nearby residents who have signed our petition at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
[surveymonkey.com]. These comments pertain to Items #5 to #8, on the May 5th Planning Commission agenda:
https://www.phoenix.gov/cityclerksite/PublicMeetings/220505008.pdf.
If Agenda Items #5‐#8 are approved, then the intensity of development on 155 acres of the Desert Character Overly
District could be doubled or tripled.
The site adjoins Sonoran Desert Drive. Attached to this message are:
An aerial showing the location of the nearly 1,000 area residents who have signed our petition thus far,
A copy of the petition, and
The reasons provided for 95% of petition signers for why they are deeply troubled by the applicant’s request to
deviate from the requirements of the Desert Character Overly District.
As you will see from the reasons provided by our petition signers, (*which is included in 47 of the 49 pages of the
attachment to this message) those who bike, run or walk along Sonoran Desert Drive feel that the volume of high‐speed
traffic already makes the two roadside bike lanes uncomfortable and in some respects unsafe. Indeed, the bike lane
design guidance documents published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO), and others indicate that the current Sonoran Desert Drive bike lanes, which are
separated from travel lanes by a painted line, is insufficient when traffic volume exceeds 7,000 – 10,000 vehicles/day
and at speeds in excess of 35 mph.
According to the applicant’s (MacEwen 480) traffic study [app.box.com], Sonoran Desert Drive was carrying 8,300
vehicles/day as of 2019. The MacEwen 480 report indicated the project would add another 13,000 vehicles per day to
Sonoran Desert Drive. In other words, this one project would increase Sonoran Desert Drive traffic volume to more than
21,000 vehicles/day, which is far in excess of the upper limit for a bike lane separated from traffic by just a painted line.
Page11201
The 45 mph speed limit along Sonoran Desert Drive makes the adjoining bike lanes far more dangerous than a more
appropriate facility. Most bike facility guidance documents call for bike lanes physically separated from travel lanes
when speeds exceed 35 mph. And the 85th percentile speed on Sonoran Desert Drive is likely 55 mph.
Of equal concern is the impact of increased Sonoran Desert Drive traffic noise on the Sonoran Desert Preserve sound
scape. While traffic noise can presently be heard along many of the trails ramifying the Preserve, the increased traffic
volume on Sonoran Desert Drive will increase the level of noise and the distance it intrudes into the Preserve. Acoustic
models indicate that each doubling of traffic volume also doubles traffic noise. By causing traffic volume to go from the
current 8,300 vehicles/day to more than 20,000 vehicles per day, the changes embodied in Agenda Items #5 ‐ #8, will
more than double the impact of traffic noise on the tranquility of Preserve trails.
It is for these reasons that we ask the Planning Commission to keep the Desert Character Overlay District as is and
recommend denial for Agenda Items #5 ‐ #8.
Following is a sampling of the reasons provided by those who signed the Save Our Sonoran Preserve petition:
I use the Sonoran preserve almost daily to get a brief reprieve from the overcrowding of Phoenix. The ability
to briefly enjoy the desert views without seeing endless developments and choking smog of cars is why we
decided to live in this area.
Currently traffic on Dove Valley / Sonoran Desert Drive is heavy during busy hours. With the addition of
Verdin adding 1200 homes could increase traffic by 3 times and with 2 new housing developments currently
being built west of us and the new semiconductor plant being built could increase traffic by 6 times as
where it is today. Plus taking over more of the desert landscape that was originally approved is just being
greedy. I am all for progress and increasing tax base but there must be limits to preserve the beauty of our
area.
The beauty of the desert is disappearing fast! We drive Sonoran desert drive 2‐3 times a week west bound
around sunset. So many people simply stop to take pictures because of the beauty. There is a brief
opportunity to do this because soon houses come into view and obstruct the natural vistas. Homes being
built today are huge two story monstrosities, cramming these large homes together will destroy this
beautiful landscape.
As a native Arizonan I am saddened to see so much of the natural beauty of our desert being scourged.
Driving anywhere in the valley and nearby areas you are assaulted by the lack of natural beauty. We need
to halt urban scrawl and save the desert for our grandchildren.
The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is one of the finest uses of tax payer dollars. The ability to hike and mountain
bike on miles and miles of trails is one of my favorite parts of living in North Phoenix. We are already
inundated with apartment complexes and home developments with plenty of inventory. Plus, there is
plenty of land available for developers to build on that won’t wreck one of the best things that the City of
Phoenix has done in the past couple decades.
Page21202
The Sonoran Preserve and the Sonoran Desert Drive represent the last of pristine desert in the City of
Phoenix. Anyone who has visited the Preserve and the Drive will see beautiful views, wildlife, and people
using the bike lanes and hiking trails. To allow a massive development to destroy the character overlay will
ruin the peaceful drive and endanger the ecosystem. I also fear that the additional traffic will no doubt
create dangerous conditions for cyclists that regularly train on Sonoran Desert Drive. We live here to
appreciate the desert. But the desert is disappearing in Phoenix. The Sonoran Preserve is a wonderful area
of Phoenix and a great place to escape to from the hustle and bustle of other areas. To grant the rezoning
request of a home builder will send the message that the City of Phoenix cares more about development
and not about the constituents who appreciate the desert and all that it offers.
Adding additional homes when there is no road infrastructure will add so much traffic. I drive SDD and
there are times when there are more than 25 cars backed up at the intersection of Cave Creek Rd. Also I am
concerned about closing up the wash between SDD because animals need to be able to traverse the entire
wash. I am not against the original number of homes but to increase it to what TM is asking is a lot more
homes. The Sonoran Preserve is very beautiful and I enjoy biking there but it is hard to cross the street with
the current amount of traffic on Dove Valley Rd and the Verdin Project will triple the amount of traffic.
I walk and bike at the preserve at least a couple of times a week. It’s beautiful, and quiet. Driving through to
Cave Creek Road is actually relaxing, I drive that way when I want to stay away from the crowds on the
freeways (17 & 101). It’s a beautiful drive, it’s what living in Az is about, wide open and beautiful to look at.
Don’t ruin it with more houses and traffic congestion.
We need to do everything we can to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve. There shouldn’t be lots of homes
there. We’ve already taken so much of the natural habitat and developed it. We need to leave large chunks
alone so that those animals that live in the desert have a place. I love having the wilderness nearby and
untouched. Increasing the number of homes near the preserve is asking for trouble and displacing so many
of the desert animals. I bought out here to be close to nature not to bring the downtown traffic here.
Our schools are already over capacity and adding yet another high density housing development will
adversely impact the school infrastructure as well as the safety to bikers in Sonoran Boulevard/Dove
Valley. Allowing larger lots and this home sizes will attract more affluent residents and this increase the tax
revenues for this region.
I oppose the Verdin site changing the current Desert Character Overlay District plan. We are already seeing
traffic that is dangerous to our cyclists and pedestrians. Adding additional homes without concern for the
traffic it will bring will greatly make this road even more dangerous.
The Desert Character Overlay District was put in place to allow for growth but with measures and
safeguards needed. Ignoring and allowing growth beyond that allowed by the Desert Overlay District in the
Sonoran Preserve area is wrong and will lessen the uniqueness and beauty that we currently have, while
also adding traffic and reducing safety for those that currently enjoy cycling, walking, hiking, etc. along
Sonoran and the preserves. Please do not allow Verdin development to move forward with their plans to
exponentially grow this area and add more homes To the Sonoran Preserve. Thank you.
Lastly, maintaining the Desert Character Overlay does not halt this project, it will only allow for smart development
near one of Phoenix’s beloved Preserves (a sensitive site) as well as give a sense of resilience to our zoning laws that
our elected officials approved. If there is one zoning law to uphold and one location to protect, it’s definitely this
one.
Respectfully,
Page31203
Gary Kirkilas, Chair
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
(708) 369‐4566
saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
[google.com]
*See Attachment
Page41204
Save Our Sonoran
Petition Signer
Locations
Page 1205
➤
N
10 mi
Page 1206
Reasons Provided By Phoenix Residents for Why They Signed
the Save Our Sonoran Preserve Petition at:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
I use the Sonoran preserve almost daily to get a brief reprieve from the overcrowding of Phoenix. The ability to
briefly enjoy the desert views without seeing endless developments and choking smog of cars is why we decided
to live in this area.
Currently traffic on Dove Valley / Sonoran Desert Drive is heavy during busy hours. With the addition of Verdin
adding 1200 homes could increase traffic by 3 times and with 2 new housing developments currently being built
west of us and the new semiconductor plant being built could increase traffic by 6 times as where it is today.
Plus taking over more of the desert landscape that was originally approved is just being greedy. I am all for
progress and increasing tax base but there must be limits to preserve the beauty of our area.
The beauty of the desert is disappearing fast! We drive Sonoran desert drive 2‐3 times a week west bound
around sunset. So many people simple stop to take pictures because of the beauty. There is a brief opportunity
to do this because soon houses come into view and obstruct the natural vistas. Home being built today are huge
two story monstrosities, craning this large home together will destroy this beautiful landscape.
As a native Arizonan I am saddened to see so much of the natural beauty of our desert being scourged. Driving
anywhere in the valley and nearby areas you are assaulted by the lack of natural beauty. We need to halt urban
scrawl and save the desert for our grandchildren.
The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is one of the finest uses of tax payer dollars. The ability to hike and mountain
bike on miles and miles of trails is one of my favorite parts of living in North Phoenix. We are already inundated
with apartment complexes and home developments with plenty of inventory. Plus, there is plenty of land
available for developers to build on that won’t wreck one of the best things that the City of Phoenix has done in
the past couple decades.
The Sonoran Preserve and the Sonoran Desert Drive represent the last of pristine desert in the city of Phoenix.
Anyone who has visited the Preserve and the Drive will see beautiful views, wildlife, and people using the bike
lanes and hiking trails. To allow a massive development destroy the character overlay will ruin the peaceful
drive and endanger the ecosystem. I also fear that the additional traffic will no doubt create dangerous
conditions for cyclists that regularly train on Sonoran Desert Drive. We live here to appreciate the desert. But
the desert is disappearing in Phoenix. The Sonoran Preserve is a wonderful area of Phoenix and a great place to
escape to from the hustle and bustle of other areas. To grant the rezoning request of a home builder will send
the message that the City of Phoenix cares more about development and not about the constituents who
Adding additional homes when there is no road infrastructure will add so much traffic. I drive SDD and there are
times when there are more than 25 cars backed up at the intersection of Cave Creek Rd. Also I am concerned
about closing up the wash between SDD because animals need to be able to traverse the entire wash. I am not
against the original number of homes but to increase it to what TM is asking is a lot more homes. The Sonoran
Preserve is very beautiful and I enjoy biking there but it is hard to cross the street with the current amount of
traffic on Dove Valley Rd and the Verdin Project will triple the amount of traffic.
I walk and bike at the preserve at least a couple of times a week. It’s beautiful, and quiet. Driving through to
cave creek rd is actually relaxing, I drive that way when I want to stay away from the crowds on the freeways
(17 & 101). It’s a beautiful drive, it’s what living in Az is about, wide open and beautiful to look at. Don’t ruin it
with more houses and traffic congestion.
Page 1207
We need to do everything we can to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve. There shouldn’t be lots of homes
there. We’ve already taken so much of the natural habitat and developed it. We need to leave large chunks
alone so that those animals that live in the desert have a place. I love having the wilderness nearby and
untouched. Increasing the number of homes near the preserve is asking for trouble and displacing so many of
the desert animals. I bought out here to be close to nature not to bring the downtown traffic here.
Our schools are already over capacity and adding yet another high density housing development will adversely
impact the school infrastructure as well as the safety to bikers in Sonoran Boulevard/Dove Valley. Allowing
larger lots and this home sizes will attract more affluent residents and this increase the tax revenues for this
I oppose the Verdin site changing the current Desert Character Overlay District plan. We are already seeing
traffic that is dangerous to our cyclists and pedestrians. Adding additional homes without concern for the traffic
it will bring will greatly make this road even more dangerous.
The Desert Character Overlay District was put in place to allow for growth but with measures and safeguards
needed. Ignoring and allowing growth beyond that allowed by the Desert Overlay District in the Sonoran
Preserve area is wrong and will lesson the uniqueness and beauty that we currently have, while also adding
traffic and reducing safety for those that currently enjoy cycling, walking, hiking, etc. along Sonoran and the
preserves. Please do not allow Verdin development to move forward with their plans to exponentially grow this
area and add more homes To the Sonoran Preserve. Thank you.
The unique space is one of the main reasons we built our home in the Gateway region. It has only been open
for a few years and needs to remain a "Preserve" and not stress or encroach on the desert any more than
already has happened.
as a third generation native zoney, I have seen too much of our beautiful desert turned over to developers. We
must preserve the very asset that draws so many to move to our wonderful state‐ find a better balance
between growth and preservation. I recently moved to a home in Sonoran Foothills to enjoy this beautiful area.
Please do not allow the greed of developers overbuild our desert.
Too much traffic and too many users making heavy environmental impact. The preserve is there for a reason.
any change to Desert Character Overlay will open the door to the entire area being filled in with high density
housing. Forever destroying the natural landscape of the area. Please vote NO.
There is already so much danger to bicyclists. Also, just as important, keeping the desert beautiful and allowing
wildlife to thrive in the Sonoran Preserve.
I've hiked the Apache Trail and adjacent areas through the years while visiting my family in Phoenix. I recently
bought a house in the area and I'm saddened and alarmed that the Phoenix City Council would entertain the
doubling or tripling the number of housing units on the Verdin site. There is a reason why the Desert Character
Overlay District is in existence. I strongly urge the Council to reject the Verdin development company's proposal
to double or triple the number of housing units for the Verdin site.
With the amount of traffic on Sonoran/Dove Valley today, when we pull out of Sonoran Gate Community, it is
taking a chance on your life when needing to turn left. Why would anyone approve more home building to get
more traffic? Also cars ‐ and trucks ‐ are speeding between 55‐70 miles an hour on this stretch. You should
have traffic lights at all intersections for turning traffic. Also, Let's Save Our Desert Views ‐ that's why we built a
Traffic is already overloaded on dove valley road and commitments were made to develop the Sonoran desert
drive. Nothing has happen. Trying to exit my desert enclave neighbor is struggle now, adding more traffic is
negligent. I also moved to the area for the serenity of the preserves and natural habits, all developers in the
area must comply with the desert character overlay.
Page 1208
My wife Barbara and I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for nearly nine years. The appeal of this location was and
still is the Sonoran Preserve, a true gift to the residents of Phoenix. Many years ago the overlay district
created a plan for growth balanced with the fragile ecosystem of the preserve. Neglecting this balance
jeopardizes the character which makes this place so special as well as places the preserve at risk. I respectfully
request the Phoenix City Council comply with the overlay and hold Verdin to the established guidelines. After all,
one of the reasons this area appeals to them is they recognize the beauty and appeal of this location to future
There’s very few places in Arizona where it’s not jam packed with houses and people. As an outdoorsman it’s a
very special place as every weekend I go there to ride a bike, hike, among other things. With the recent houses
built, it went from a Mecca for outdoor enthusiasts to just a nice place. I used to be able to ride and run without
seeing anyone for miles. Now Everytime I almost get hit by a car traveling to fast and then riding in the bike
lane. Phoenix in general is one of the worst cities for bike fatalities and this literally is the one spot that we can
count on for not getting hit. If this goes up than we really will have no place to call home. Please reconsider
This area is greatly used for hiking, biking, trail running, and outdoor recreational activities. We do not want
over development to ruin the natural aesthetics, significantly increase noise, or pollution that would degrade
the value of the true remaining wilderness in the Sonoran Desert Preserve. Please seek to enforce and uphold
the Desert Character Overlay District toward the Verdin project and other subsequent proposals.
Traffic is my main issue. As a Sonoran bike route it is becoming more and more dangerous for bikers. School
traffic on main roads and through neighborhoods also has become more dangerous. Wilderness can never be
recaptured once homes are built so we have a once in a lifetime duty to save land for conservation and wildlife.
Thanks for listening
We need to preserve the landscape before there is nothing left of the valley except city streets. The entire eco
system changes affecting animal habitats, raising temperatures, and Killing plant life. Phoenix is slowly killing
an entire section of it's appeal by building further north into natural landscape.
I hike thru the preserve almost everyday. It is a beautiful and peaceful area amid the city. Losing this area to
Korea housing would be awful. There is so much development everywhere so these special areas are becoming
all the more important to spare or not over develop. Once it is gone it can not be replaced. Please don't let this
wonderful area be ruined by more over development!
Maintain desert preserve, congestion, quality of life, safer place to enjoy desert with exercise.
Love the beauty that this area brings to all.
We need to start limiting the amount of residential builds in the Sonoran Preserve area before this majestic
natural place is no more. Preserve the habitat and recreational area this land offers local residents and tourists.
The area is already congested and poses safety concerns for bicyclists, hikers and drivers due to the increased
motor traffic activity. Adding more congestion would further escalate the risk and concern associated.
Additional development will ruin the Sonoran Reserve’s pristine nature. Please preserve this vital area for our
Desert’s wildlife for generations to come to enjoy .
The development that is already out there detracts from the natural environment immensely. Additional
development will only make this worse. Build elsewhere...just not here please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Sonoran Preserve was the deciding factor for my wife and I to move to this area. We had hoped that
Preserve would stay as it is a Natural desert landscape that was protected for all to enjoy. We enjoy the
numerous hiking trails, walking areas that are safe and the pavilions that we use to gather with friends . We
knew that there would be issues when we seen new developments popping up and took away the Natural
surroundings. This has to stop . Did I mention the wildlife that we all see and enjoy? These developments are all
about one thing ‐ greed. Please let this continue to be the Sonoran Preserve!
Page 1209
I am a local resident that loves riding and hiking the Sonoran Preserve. We already have so much traffic in the
road ways around the preserve. I am tired of having to live in a beautiful desert that just keeps slowly
disappearing because of development. Animals are being pushed out and more traffic noise and people does
not help. The schools are already maxed out. How many more homes will come after this development is
approved? Please keep the desert the desert.
Wildlife protection and natural beauty
It’s our beautiful land! Save the land from unnecessary buildings.
Want to keep area lower traffic
Safeguarding the Sonoran Desert Preserve values we treasure
It is not needed for the tax base, it will overwhelm the infrastructure in place, it will eventually lead to the
destruction of the desert through the continued use of ATVs and other off road recreational vehicles as well as
lead to increased congestion and, yes, increased crime.
It’s vital to keep the preserve natural and untouched for the use of hiking and supporting outdoor activities.
Without the regulations in place there would be no preserve to use and admire. The animals in the preserve
would be greatly affected by a larger population crowding them.
It is important to preserve the natural desert landscape and prevent overbuild that will destroy habitats.
Ignoring the desert character overlay district would be a HUGE mistake. Overdevelopment will ruin the desert
and will change the habitat in and around that area and big developers don’t care about that so it’s our job to
care for them.
We need more open space and already have enough homes!
No more building and take away from our desert landscape. Stop already.
Concerned for the environment, the pollution in our area is to much. The desert is also disappearing because of
over population
Sonoran desert is such a beautiful drive. Everyone should be able to experience it. Sonoran desert drive is not
meant for a high volumes of traffic and our beautiful Sonoran desert would be ruined with the addition of
housing developments along Sonoran Desert Drive.
I’m concerned about all the animals in the area. As well as if you continue to build what about the schools and
the traffic. It no longer will be a peaceful environment. And the more expensive homes you build people really
can’t afford them but end up in bankruptcy and then they’ll be empty
We need open space for our and our children's mental health to provide a place of refuge and exercise areas
that remove us from the daily drone of cars, machines and our phones.
The volume of traffic is already out of control on Sonoran Desert Drive. Please keep the Sonoran Preserve as it
Protect wildlife that has already been driven out of surrounding areas. Keep the intention of a preserve.
As the builders destroy the land for more houses the animal life get pushed away and in to smaller areas of
open land. Or get caught in or on people's property. Unacceptable to just ignore the standards for there
That is a protected place that we need to take care as part of our lungs we need good air, we have so many
houses, why we need to destroy the habitat of a lot of animals.
Overdeveloping is irresponsible when there’s no plan for increased traffic and water supply!
Preserve recreation area that is part of and enjoyed by our community. Prevent gross over development which
will destroy the desert community which we call home
This land is important to keep more open than crowded!
Keep our desert traffic and congestion to a minimum; we still enjoy a lot of wildlife.
Keeping the beauty of the desert in tact, especially with the hiking/biking that is done there. Also very
concerned about traffic and congestion.
Taking away the sceneries wildlife and open park trails to enjoy. Once you start building gets crowded needing
more wider roads taking away from the above
Page 1210
It is vitally important that the Sonoran desert preserve is kept safe from over population of the surrounding
areas! The overbuilding of the area will degrade the beautiful that we and future generations need in our lives
to create the balance of city living. It’s critical! Over building followed by extremely high traffic increases will
destroy the preservation of it’s natural beauty. I ask that the members of the Phoenix City Counsel hear our
concerns and uphold the Desert Character Overlay District as it was intended.
Destroying the desert, views and too much traffic on Dove Valley/Sonoran PkwyN which also funnels to Jomax
where many school‐aged child ride bikes and walk.
I have lived in this area for 11 years and have been walking those trails for just as long. It is an amazing preserve
that I treasure walking every single day. The scenery is beautiful and the wildlife thrives in the area. Losing any
portion of this place would be a disgrace to this gorgeous piece of land that should be protected for the people
of our area. Please reconsider this, i am beyond disappointed to hear that this is even a thought. Please save our
Beautiful desert scenery and nearby desert recreation like hiking and biking.
I am concerned because my backyard will face the six lane road. As it is the two lane road(dove valley and
Sonoran dessert drive) is driven like a freeway and most people do not go the speed limit. I could just imagine
what the six lane would be like behind us. When we purchased this home we were not made aware of the plans
the city had for this area. Very disappointed. Also Verdin having 1400 hundred homes would really make the
traffic crazier than it already is right now.. like I said very disappointing!!
Traffic will increase dramatically! Hiking and cycling will no longer be enjoyable and r safe.
The growth of the area needs to slow down. The area cannot handle the traffic nor can the police keep up with
enforcing traffic safety. There are too many irresponsible drivers who think Senora Desert Dr is a nascar
track. Adding more drivers will be an irresponsible choice of local government and making our roads less safe
for recreational use. A white line for a bike lane does nothing when cars/trucks are going 60 mph.
Way too much traffic
Desire to maintain the nature preserve and to limit traffic and related safety hazards.
The desert is being over built and animals have few places left to inhabit. The views of mountains and the
skyline are increasingly blocked by taller and taller buildings and dwellings
I moved to this area to enjoy the desert and the wildlife associated with the environment. Developers have one
objective ‐ money. We must preserve what is left of this beautiful landscape
Beautiful drive and prime hiking area
Northern Phoenix is already getting overrun by new developments. Would be nice to keep some lands in their
natural state so we can enjoy the beauty it brings
It’s a beautiful corridor and vital habitat for desert wildlife, along with a natural desert wash.
I live right next to it and want to see it preserved.
I love this natural area. It is very important that the building be kept down as we are losing our natural areas to
concrete and overdevelopment. AZ does not have enough water for all of these homes/buildings. Traffic is
horrendous already. Please don’t do this.
Original 2006 owner who has seen this area grow and change. I’m very concerned about the population over
expansion in this area. I live right off Dove Valley which has already become unsafe due to traffic volume and
lack of proper traffic signals (some of which are on the way). However, I don’t believe Dove Valley was ever
intended to hold the kind of volume it will experience if growth is not governed. I for one wholeheartedly
support the enforcement of the Desert Character Overlay District. Thank you
I grew up in cave creek which is right on the other side and I know the value to this desert landscape and the
peace it brings to others. It’s natures playground let it be
Preserving the natural beauty of the area is important to current residents. They use this area for healthy
recreation. It also should be saved fir environmental reasons. Don’t add to the sprawl that is already part of
may areas in Phoenix .
I live in the neighborhood and don’t want them to change our desert look it’s very important
Page 1211
The Desert Character Overlay District should be adhered to.
My family and I enjoy biking and hiking in that area, which is part of the reason we live where we do. We believe
the City of Phoenix made a informed and important decision to maintain the wilderness, beauty and safety of
that area for a reason and would hate to see that decision overturned.
This is a beautiful scenic preserve that has already experienced housing growth, wild fires caused by humans,
and an increase in traffic. We have lived in this area for 15 years and specifically love that it used to be quiet and
just outside of the city. No thank you to further developments! Preserve the land, wildlife, and natural growth!
This is a great recreation area for biking and hiking and too high of density development will be detrimental to
these uses.
Our wildlife is being displaced and soon will not have a place to live. People want them killed as they are afraid
of them! We will live in a denser area and it will soon feel like NY City! We must find a balance for all.
The main reason we bought our home in this location was because of how beautiful the desert is and very
peaceful. Almost feels like we're out of town in our very own neighborhood. Also, there is already an
infrastructure challenge with the lack of grocery stores, restaurants, gas stations etc. Adding 1200 more homes
would have a major impact on everything around us and create serious traffic issues to go anywhere, even on
I and my family moved to this area to enjoy the preserve. While we understand there is growth in the area, it
was done under the rules and regulations set forth. I would ask that all builders comply.
Too many housing developments going up, water, waste and increased traffic issues.
Leaving the preserve alone will allow animals to preserve their homes. This drive is one of the most beautiful
drives in the valley and really displays all of what is natural Arizona. Also, traffic is bad enough as it is. Adding
thousands of houses would further crowd what is currently a quiet, serene pet of the valley. Let’s keep a small
piece of desert instead.
I have lived in the norterra area since 2006. I have seen the development boom since I arrived. This last little bit
of land seems to be the only thing left in the area. It's necessary to preserve for wildlife and for us. We are
nurtured by nature. The drive is beautiful and we utilize hiking and biking trails often.
I absolutely love the beauty of the desert and the opportunity we have to get out in the preserve to hike, run
and bike. I am an avid trail runner and hiker and would be devastated if we lose that ability just to make way for
more houses.
The speed at which the traffic flows is about 20 over the speed limit and it is a matter of time before a biker is
killed. This is happening currently and with more traffic /homes it will be worse. We don’t have the school
space to support more homes. We moved up north to get away from traffic and now the desert is at risk of
being destroyed by more builds.
After retirement, I moved here from the city specifically to enjoy the Sonora Preserve. To lose the beauty of
The Preserve would be nothing short Of a crime.
I love to hike, bike, and walk the foothills. Open space is why we bought up here.
I live off of Sonoran Desert Drive now. There is no infrastructure in place at this time to support additional
development. There has already been an influx of both commercial and residential in this area within the last
year. Until the city, county and state does much more work to improve our roads, water, and law enforcement
existing issues; there should be no further development at this time.
I am very concerned with the amount of traffic and safety in my community with the amount of people that
could potentially be here. We are a quiet and safe neighborhood and I'd like to keep it this way.
Traffic is already too heavy and congested. Our streets are becoming dangerous.
It is important that we preserve our land to make it available to enjoy the outside life without the traffic.
This area is beautiful and it would be a shame for it to be overdeveloped.
It’s a preserve for a reason. That’s why we chose to live here. Thank you.
The number of people hiking is increasing but even if is not, the streets are narrow and it is dangerous to drive.
Page 1212
The Sonoran Preserve is a magnificent specimen of the desert. The desert plants and wildlife within this area are
a dream come true for hikers and bicyclists. With the increase of people moving into the area, traffic has grown
exponentially. If we build more homes in this area, we need to put measures in place to protect this valuable
asset to our state, as well as provide safety for the people who visit it throughout the year.
I'm mountain bike in the Sonoran preserve 3 to 4 times per week and feel it is vitally important to keep some
space set aside with minimal traffic and housing.
I have many reasons for you to consider preserving the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive. Homes and
traffic directly impact the fragile desert. Urban heat, pollution, and human destruction directly destroy the
desert plants. The Sonoran Preserve was set aside for the specific reason of preserving an area for people to
enjoy the beauty of the desert. Adding homes along the Sonoran Preserve and Sonoran Desert Drive will
increase traffic. Solutions to traffic congestion is to add and or expand lanes which will take up desert land.
Lastly and more importantly, Arizona is in a major drought. More homes means less water. There are plenty of
homes and apartments being built in Phoenix without taking from the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert
The preserve is a sanctuary and feel that this increased volume of homes would create a dangerous high traffic
in an area that is a recreational haven for cyclist, hikers and runners. The impact of these homes will also have a
negative affect on the the wildlife and natural dessert of the area.
We chose to move to Sonoran Foothills to be close to the desert landscape and away from the dense population
of the city. We understood that the city had protected the areas surrounding the preserve by requiring certain
standards and limiting the number of homes that can be built. The requirements that were in place while the
Sonoran foothills community was being built, maintain the overall integrity of the surrounding desert. There is a
mix of apartment homes, patio homes and homes with lots. All were required to follow strict landscaping
guidelines to match the desert. Why aren’t these standards being upheld for any future development? It is
evident that greed is now winning. The home builders goal is to build as many houses as will be allowed as this is
most profitable for them. They are NOT concerned with the impact this will have on traffic, current residents or
the desert. Also, it appears the city is trying to solve the housing shortage by putting in a disproportionate
number of high density dwellings from I‐17 to Cave Creek.
Me and my family and friends are all avid trail runners with great respect for our wildlife and natural
ecosystems. I don’t dispute the need for housing but the Desert Character Overlay District put the standards in
place for exactly this reason ‐ to prevent developers from overdevelopment that would ruin the NATURAL
ecosystem. I applaud them for some of the measures they propose in planning but that will never make up for
any zoning change and quite frankly is hypocritical. Please make sure Verdin complies with the current standard
I frequent the Sonoran Preserve 2‐3 times a week and my husband road bikes 4‐5 times a week in the bike
lanes. We enjoy being able to go enjoy the desert without having to see home after home. We are also in a
drought and putting more homes up does not help address the issue. Please think about keeping more open
spaces for everyone to enjoy who already lives here it is getting crowded enough.
My family and I are avid cyclists, and for the past five years we have seen an increase of cars and speed. I myself
had a couple of car and motorcycle incidents due to the amount of traffic and their speed. I’m worried that with
the increase of housing it’s only going to make our rides more dangerous, as drivers don’t respect speed limits.
Please keep the overlay as it was intended. Don’t put money over our safety. Thank you
There has been way to much building in the Sonoran Preserve area! This is destroying the beauty of the desert. I
have lived in Phoenix area for 49 years and this once beautiful desert is being destroyed by over developing.
Some of the most recent developments off the I‐17 and Dexalita destroy some of the mountain to put more
homes in the area. When this happens we are not being good stuarts of the land. We need to find away to live
Page 1213
I have lived at this address for 20 years and have watched the area grow. My wife and I have hiked and biked in
the Sonoran Preserve area hundreds of times, and now we have introduced our children to a love of nature
through seeing Olive the owl on Hawk's Nest Trail and wildflower blooms biking along the Apache Wash trail. In
the middle of a growing city, this Preserve is an oasis that allows residents from near and far to relax and escape
the pace of city life. It magically transports visitors to a place that feels quiet and free. Please help us preserve
this for us and future visitors!
Phoenix is growing at a very rapid rate. If something is not done now to save lands, there will be no desert areas
left and all wildlife here will perish. We must preserve this unique Sonoran Preserve.
I've lived in this area for the last 3+ years and a major reason we moved here is because of the desert setting
and because it didn't feel as crowded as other parts of the Valley. Sad to see our beautiful preserve turned into
crappy track homes.
I'm mainly just concerned with the increased amount of traffic new housing developments will create.
I hike from Apache Wash frequently as well as the trails in Sonoran Preserve South and don’t want to see the
desert character of these areas impacted. Please hold Taylor Morrison to these rules. They were put in place for
a reason. Don’t allow them to disregard them.
The amount of traffic we already have on dove valley is excessive. We do not need to add more.
I am signing this petition as I care deeply about keeping the Sonoran preserve sacred. It is important to preserve
the existing ecosystems. Additionally, This area is already dangerous with increasing traffic.
I love cycling here and I don't want that to change.
It is nature at its finest. The desert is dwindling especially in this area with all of the commercial building and
housing going up. The hot air balloons are even running out of space to take off from and land on. Dove Valley
Road / Sonoran Desert Drive has become a speedway and dumping ground. It is a shame that people have such
disregard for such a beautiful area and putting up more housing will only make it worse. Years ago we were told
that no homes would be built off of that road. I know because I used to live in Carefree Crossings and attended
many meetings about it. Listen to the people for a change and leave this area alone. It was built for people to
enjoy it, not destroy it.
I want to preserve the desert. We have a water shortage not enough water now for the people that live here.
Not enough schools why aren’t the building responsible for building schools for the children?
We do not want this new development because we love the natural desert we chose to live near. In addition,
we do need the excessive amount of traffic that such a development would cause.
The original proposal to conserve the ecosystem while allowing for reasonable growth is threatened. The
proposed increase will increase vehicle traffic, noise, pollution, and make biking along this area unsafe.
The beauty and tranquility of the Sonoran Preserve is vital to the character of this community’s identity.
With so much growth in Arizona & Phoenix in particular, it is vital to retain the open spaces for all residents to
use and enjoy ‐ there was great foresight when determining preserves and buffered lands around them. The
roads ‐ current and even proposed new ones ‐ won’t be able to safely support the sudden surge of vehicles and
will most definitely increase the traffic volume and many drivers, bikers and pedestrians will experience a
greater risk of accidents. Please listen to the residents in the area that will be most impacted. Thank you.
We don't have the infrastructure to support any additional growth. I wish we could halt the issuance of any
further building permits in the state until we can guarantee the people of AZ that we will have adequate water
and energy resources to match projected growth rates. We can NOT have growth outpace supply.
Our house backs up to the desert. We bought that house because it backs up to the desert, I want to to keep
our view and our slower simple lifestyle there and not turn its into a big city feel.
I don’t want to see traffic increase. I would like to see the desert stay peaceful and empty.
Want beauty while biking
Page 1214
I have cycled on this road for close to a decade. It’s been one of the only “safe” roads. In addition, the preserve
is quiet and beautiful and has remained a short distance from home. As traffic gets worse we are losing that
quiet, beautiful Arizona gem.
We specifically moved to this area b/c of the preserve and the peacefulness that it brings to our lives and
neighborhood. District guidelines are in place for a reason and should not be adjusted for a greedy developer.
I enjoy cycling on the road. It is a safe, fast, and serene place to ride my bike. The crisp early morning air,
sunrise, and hot air balloons, are a real treat.
Keep the beauty of the desert and keep traffic minimal on Sonoran Desert Drive as there are no crossroads to
take as an alternate route if traffic is heavy on Sonoran Desert Drive.
This area is vital for wildlife and preserving the bike trails be able to trail ride in the unspoiled desert we don’t
need anymore traffic thru here it would completely ruin the whole area
My household enjoys both biking and hiking along the Sonoran Desert Drive several times a week. One of the
main reasons I moved out of the Kierland area was to escape the traffic/congestion. Please don't turn my
beautiful Sonoran Preserve into a traffic nightmare. Uphold the safeguards that make this preserve a treasure.
Thank you, Councilman Waring.
We back up to Dove Valley.....the traffic has already increased exponentially over the past few years and people
use this road as a freeway....safety for our kids and everyone in our community is a huge concern.
My family and I use these trials for recreation purposes. We are also concerned as a community for the traffic as
well as how it will effect the wildlife.
Please do not overcrowd our area and stress our resources. Sonoran Desert Drive is beautiful and offers
wonderful opportunity to be outside and healthy. Please preserve this area.
We moved here for the natural beauty of this area and the outdoor freedom to run, bike and hike. In addition
we wanted to get away from all the congestion and crazy traffic. I am concerned for pedestrian safety and not
being able to enjoy the wilderness in peace. Not to mention all the traffic added to Sonoran Desert Drive which
is no longer relaxing and becomes stressful on a daily basis.
Congestion. Rezoning opens doors to more rezoning. Will cost the county money to widen roads. And I like less
people around.
We need less development and more room to safely enjoy nature with trails and outdoor activities. Dove Valley
Rd is already a speed zone and super trafficked, more development is a detriment to our beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. Please reject this proposal.
This is my neighborhood..I live here. I hike these beautiful trails five times a week. There are plenty of acres of
desert in other areas. People come from all over the valley to hike and bike here.This land has been set aside
for this and should not be taken away.
Sonoran Desert Drive is a safe haven for athletes and cyclists. It’s the one road in the Phoenix area in which
cyclists and feel safe in the road without the fear of being hit by cars.
We use the parkway weekly for our bike training, along with thousands of other riders. This parkway has forever
been a haven for riders looking to escape the dangerous city streets of Arizona, and bringing more traffic or
reducing our ability to use the parkway could result in a major increase in vehicle‐bike related accidents which
unequivocally result in harm to the cyclist ‐ often fatally. The proposed development could spell disaster for the
cycling community in Arizona.
There is already a staggering amount of traffic between the preserves and additional housing per acre only
harms these sacred areas. We are growing at a staggering rate and sacrificing our beautiful lands and existing
safe guards isn't the right approach to addressing this growth. The land and homes will sell and the only reason
to increase hones per acre is to increase their profits.
Page 1215
I urge you not to ignore the Desert Character Overly District and over develop one of the few remaining
preserves in city limits so a developer can make more money. Please consider your constituents way of life and
safety over profits for a corporation. Thank you for your consideration.
I run on those trails weekly at Apache wash trailhead, I bike Sonoran Parkway road safely multiple times weekly.
If traffic/construction/and wildlife are destroyed it would be incredibly heartbreaking.
I specifically bought a home in this area in part because of the Sonoran Desert Preserve and the numerous
hiking trails available. The traffic has increased substantially in the past several years. The closure of I 17 in
either direction already turns our neighborhood into a parking lot at times. Sincerely, Terry
I live in this area, I use the hiking trails and bike paths along Sonoran drive on a weekly basis, I love looking out
into the Desert everytime and taking in its natural beauty it has to offer, Roof tops would hinder this…. If the
county/city ever needs additional funding they can have Police officers patrol Sonoran Desert drive and would
run out of paper giving traffic tickets, its already a race track with the driving practices on this road,,,,, more
congestion will make it worst and a lot more dangerous than itvis now, I quit riding my bike in the bike lane on
that road, I ride on the bike path to the north of the road for that reason…
Preserve land is sacred and should maintained as suck to keep the value to it's community members.
This development will ruin the last open space area around the Sonoran Preserve. There are plenty of other
housing developments in the north Phoenix area closer to I‐17 that will assist those moving to the valley. This
development is not necessary. There are also major water, traffic and fire concerns with this new development.
1. Concerned about wildlife being displaced and natural habitats being significantly reduced 2. High occupancy
buildings coupled with houses will bring more traffic and pollution and impact the infrastructure 3. Impact on
city resources such as water especially scary as water levels are so low 4 impact to education facilities ‐ schools
are over crowded
We truly need to preserve our Sonoran Desert and we need to maintain the original reason this area has been
preserved. We are rapidly losing our Sonoran Desert and our recreation areas, not to mention our wildlife are
losing their homes. We can’t be nothing but concrete. We should take pride in living in a beautiful part of town.
Please Preserve!!
We cannot keep moving the wild habitat out of their homes! Moving into this community we were told this
reserve was here to stay so we would never have to worry about build going up on it ‐ clearly, that has changed.
Do not let greed destroy our quality of life.
The preserve and drive are my little bit of sanctuary to and from work. I enjoy the beautiful flowers and desert
landscape daily, not to mention the gorgeous sunsets and sunrises I see every day. Please keep this part of
Arizona as it is.
We are loosing the beauty that was one of the huge reasons for moving where we live. All you are you doing is
bringing more infrastructure. I understand that growth needs to take place but I think that it should be done in a
much better way. Putting up a bunch of houses on top of each other is not the solution. I see greed takes the
upper hand over more intelligent decisions. Thank you
One of the reasons I moved to this area was because of the Preserve and being told it would not be developed.
How incredibly sad we're even needing to have this discussion. Please do the right thing and save the Sonoran
This preserve is important for the community and wildlife!
This beautiful desert area needs to maintain its character and uniqueness. It’s the reason why many people live
in the area. Stop!!
Sara Rovarino
Keep as much preserves and mountains natural
I want to keep the area accessable for recreation.
Page 1216
We moved to our current home to enjoy the benefits of having access to the Sonoran Preserve. The Desert
Character Overlay District was created to preserve the integrity of this precious commodity, if it is ignored, the
beauty and recreational benefits of the preserve will be significantly reduced.
We need to preserve our natural habitat.Increased construction around the area already put too much load on
traffic and school system.We have no new building of schools and we are worried where all these will get
We need to save our desert preserve and wildlife. There are plenty if other placex in the area and in Phoenix
where it is more appropriate and less disruptive to build.
Save wildlife and the desert
There are plenty of other places to build, these this beautiful piece of land beautiful. Keep the traffic down for
those of us who use this area for biking. Oh yes, and where are you getting all the water to support all of this
new construction?!?
Please follow the Desert Character Overlay District plan. Keep traffic low and undeveloped land so we can enjoy
the preserve.
There has already been enough building along Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert Drive. Please leave the preserve so
that we can continue to enjoy its beauty.
I live around the corner in Sonoran Foothills community and one of the reasons we moved here was to be able
to bike on Dove Valley and Sonoran Desert, as we train for Triathlons year round. Every car you add to these
roads makes this more dangerous for us. I have almost been hit twice by cars coming out of Sonoran Gate
community. The proposed development of over 1400 homes will destroy this very special area.
Like to go hiking there and see the natural views.
The Sonoran Preserve is important to me because of the beauty if the area and the animals that call it home.
Sonoran Desert Drive needs to remain a less busy road so it is safe for the bicyclists that use it for exercise and
the people that walk the path along the road and preserve.
Myself and so many of my neighbors and friends hike this area on a regular basis! There is a nest that an owl
comes back to every year! There are beautiful fees of the amazing area in which so many of us call home! Please
don’t destroy an area we love and cherish
To be able to get out of the city and experience the peacefulness and beauty of the Sonoran desert so easily is
what makes this area unique. Once it is gone it is gone.
We love biking on the path along the reserve with our 2 girls, crossing Sonoran Desert is already a bit nerve
wracking with current traffic, I can't imagine how much this would increase given the added homes. This is such
a beautiful stretch of road and adding these homes would greatly impact the noise, traffic and beauty of this
area. Not to mention the surrounding grocery stores, roadways and restaurants are already stretched so thin
because the number of homes has increased greatly without the other resources to support it!
The increase in traffic volume that will result from additional development in this area is not sustainable or in
keeping with the objectives of the preserve.
Doubling or tripling the number of housing units is not sustainable and concerning that it will impact the
surroundings negatively
Increased traffic, depleted water, and loss of vital desert preserve. In addition, approval here increases the
likelihood that thousands of additional homes will be added throughout the preserve in years to come.
There is enough congestion and traffic as it is. Not to mention, our beautiful desert is continually being built in.
I am extremely concerned about over building at the expense of the natural desert. Loss of natural
settings/habitat, increased traffic, speeding, congestion, crime, burglary, all the issues that come with high
My concern is for public safety first and foremost. In addition to the widening of the Sonoran roadway and the
disregard for the serenity of the desert. Finally I feel the City is growing too fast with little regard for Public
Safety and infrastructure growth.
Page 1217
I've lived in this area for many years and treasure the Sonoran Desert Preserve beyond measure. As an avid
hiker and lover of the unique beauty, plant life and wildlife of the Sonoran Desert, I feel privileged to be able to
enjoy this natural area as part of my "everyday." I'm also aware and incredibly proud of the hard work and
careful thought that went into preserving this land in the first place. It was a job so very well done, and I would
be incredibly disappointed and dispirited to see those efforts and safeguards dismantled in any way.
The beauty of the desert & also a place for the animals to live. We gave already taken enough of their home.
Enjoy bicycling through the preserve. The road is too narrow for the traffic already using the parkway.
My wife and I have a true love for the desert surroundings and this is what brought us to Sonoran Gate
Community. In order to keep the beauty of the desert, it must be limited to homeowners. We hike, mtn bike,
and road cycle throughout this area and with the more chance of new development comes the increase in
traffic. My wife was hit by a car while riding on the road because a driver was speeding and not paying
attention. With little to no law enforcement on Dove Valley Rd. Sonoran Desert Drive, it's expected for drivers
to obey the speed limit but that is not the case, we live here and we see it every day and we are concerned
about more development on a large scale to come into play. If your serious about appreciating the natural
preserves then we challenge you to show it and not let the love of money ditract you from what your heart is
telling you. I hope you please take a deeper look before you decide. Thank you
So many animals will get displaced from there natural habitats.
Preserving our beautiful desert and its wildlife is crucial. This is what makes this area so special and why many of
us chose to live here. This project will significantly add to the traffic and pollution and negatively effect this
natural environment.
Safe and beautiful area to hike and bike.
Please preserve this pristine piece of Sonoran Desert for the native flora and fauna and for our future
To preserve the natural desert. Traffic is already excessive. This area is amazing for bike rides, hiking & exercise.
Let’s keep it that way.
Beautiful, wildlife, reduced traffic : )
I moved to the area after serving in the military for 25 years because of its natural beauty and proximity to the
preserve. The building in this area has skyrocketed in recent years. Future development of the preserve will
only deplete the area of its scenery and overpopulation of an already strained region of north Phoenix.
It is one of the most beautiful areas of the valley. Please dont spoil it.
It is important to save the Preserve and Drive because developers and their need for more and more money is
literally killing the desert and taking away all things that are indigenous to this perfect State I have lived in my
whole life, born and raised. I have worked up in this area for 20 plus years and it has been so sad to see the loss
of the desert. The Sonora Desert Drive is something so special and one of the few places left in the Valley that
makes you feel like you are really in the desert without thousands of pieces of property. Please do not take
away the beauty of these areas!!!
The Sonoran preserve is just that, “A preserve”. It was specifically zoned to prevent this kind of development,
or any development for that matter. We use this area almost on a daily basis for hiking, biking and driving on
the parkway. If these projects are developed and built I will seriously consider leaving this area and moving to a
quieter place. These builders should look for other areas not designated as preserves to build their housing.
The natural desert is one of the most unique places and somehow we have to realize it is something we cannot
afford to destroy. I understand the need for homes and such, but please leave this area be. Please!
We need to keep as much nature untouched and beautiful.
The preserve was set aside for a reason. And the reason was not to then go back and develops it a few years
later. Leave the preserve a preserve. There is plenty of other land to develope.
As a cyclist, I truly enjoy being able to ride on Sonoran Parkway and enjoy the beauty of the desert. Over
developing this area would destroy our landscape. I truly hope that our city will choose not to over develop and
keep the natural beauty intact
Page 1218
My family and I enjoy walking, hiking, and driving by the preserve and the planned Verdin development on a
daily basis. It is a highlight of our day and one of the only areas in Phoenix that people can enjoy the natural
beauty of the desert, because it maintains the desert character overlay. It would be very disheartening if this
beautiful surrounding area loses its desert character. I trust that members of the Phoenix city council will reject
the request to maintain the desert character overlay. Thank you.
It’s imperative to preserve and protect the wildlife and their natural habitat. This area is already exploding with
growth & traffic.
Please stop encouraging overgrowth. We do not have sufficient resources for the population growth. Let the
desert live. There should not be such things as zoning changes that crowd people and houses into areas to allow
developers to make money and walk away.
My husband and I moved into the area specifically for the trails and wilderness of the Sonoran Preserve. We
hike the trails at least twice a week with our dogs. Please do not allow more encroachment just for the sake of
making more money! I am a retired registered nurse and served the indigent populations and can't afford to
move again. Please stop this!
We live in the Sonoran Gate community. I’m also a cyclist. We moved here to escape congestion and enjoy the
outdoors. All of that is threatened with this current building frenzy. Why would we abandon the express
purpose of these Preserves, so carefully planned and uniquely executed?! And where are we finding a
sustainable water supply for this unbridled development? This is madness.
Destroying desert habitat, overpopulating an area not intended to. Negative effects on property value.
This area can not support anymore homes. We don’t have the commercial needed. Also, we need to preserve
the desert. That is a popular scenic drive and hiking area.
Protect the Sonoran preserve
It is a beautiful drive and I am sad to see they have done any development along this stretch of road. I thought
this was a preserve but it doesn't seem like it lately with all of the signs I have seen go up lately.
Preserve the natural beauty of the AZ desert.
People already speed like crazy on this road and I'm afraid accidents will go up
I ride in the Preserve and along the Drive four or five times a week.
We are already experiencing high volume traffic and with the micro chip company, the traffic will be
unbearable. I believe in growth but we need to preserve what’s left with our AZ desert.
Conservation will protect the wildlife. Driving them out of their natural habitat could put some animals at risk of
extinction. There are other desert areas/land that could be built on. Preserving will help reduce our footprint
and help reduce traffic and pollution.
Please adhere to the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards. We need space to walk, bike, play and enjoy
the natural beauty of the desert.
Keeping natural habitats for the animals that belong here. We are on their land and need to be cognizant of
that. Also, future generations need to be able to enjoy nature as it is meant to be.
Upon moving to my home in Sonoran Commons I was told all this state land would stay undeveloped. That was
a key factor in purchasing my home because I love the drive, but most importantly Hiking and biking. It was very
disappointing when the Taylor Morrison community built where I was told no homes would be and increasing
more homes and traffic would be disappointing not to mention destroy the sonoran desert further. Please do
not allow this to happen!
Maintain the natural open space in this areas Traffic congestion issues
My family hikes and bikes in this area and there is already too much traffic and disruption in this area. The traffic
on Cave Creek Rd. and Sonoran Desert Drive is very congested and getting worse. Housing needs to be more
controlled in this area to avoid infrastructure problems and environmental impacts.
Leave the desert un touched
We need to preserve it for the wildlife that lives in it and keep the beauty of the desert environment in tact.
Page 1219
We bought a home in this area in 2009 with the idea that the Sonoran Preserve would remain a Preserve. We
and many of our neighbors enjoy using the walking, hiking and biking trails because of its serenity. Please don't
let the lure of developers'money start chipping away at it. The city invested a lot to create the trails and the
Apache Wash trailhead. Let's preserve the Preserve.
The traffic needs to stay low for cyclist and hiker safety. The noise pollution would be overbearing. I hike there
year round and the traffic is already too much. The light pollution and noise would bring harm to wildlife and the
flora of the area. Keep the surrounding area cool by adding no more concrete and asphalt. Please do not
eliminate the protections placed to keep our Sonoran Preserve, preserved. If you allow people to encroach on
the preserve further, you'd no longer be able to call it a "preserve." Perhaps the Sonoran Development, or the
Former Sonoran Preserve, or the Sonoran Encroachment. Not good. I've lived here 12 years and the preserve
gets more and more use by people who want to enjoy it. If you roll back these protections even an inch, people
will just keep pushing and keep pushing, until all of those inches add up to no more preserve. Stand strong. I
hope you get a lot of responses. Please do not mess with the preserve.
We selected this area to live, in part, based on the feeling of being closer to nature. The Sonoran Preserve
played a big part in that feeling. The loss of any Preserve open space or the increase in traffic thru the Preserve
will diminish that feeling. Please require all developers to comply with existing develop restrictions and do not
"lessen" those restrictions. ‐ Thank you...
Our family enjoys the scenic drive down Sonoran Desert Drive. I’m saddened to hear they already have plans to
develop some of that land. The dessert landscape and easy access to trails from Fireside are unique to living in
Norterra and I would hate to see that change. It’s already becoming over crowded up here and traffic is
effected. Please consider preserving our beautiful desert landscape.
Concerned about traffic on current roadway & effects on wildlife habitats. As well as construction dirt, debris &
trash.
Maintain the beauty and areas to hike.
We live in the area and do not need to have more houses built, apartments, etc. The traffic is becoming
unbearable, and to abolish the desert is a terrible thing for the wildlife and beauty of the desert. I enjoy hiking
Natural beauty
I moved up in this area to get away from the city, crowds and traffic, enjoy the outdoors to hike and cycle.
It’s such a beautiful, natural area. No more development!
To keep our desert preserves for walking and hiking viewing the beautiful scenery NOT more houses. I moved up
here because of the secluded area and the ability to walk to trails and trailhead. Traffic has gotten so bad on
Dove valley road. Bikers (I) ride this road all the time and won’t be able to during construction and after as
traffic will make it too dangerous. I personally don’t even feel my neighborhood should not have been built here.
I use the preserve for hiking. Get out into nature but close by the house.
Great hiking and exploring area.
Beautiful desert and shouldn’t be changed for housing
As a frequent hiker it is important to regulate traffic and protect our beautiful Sonoran desert ecosystem.
Primary reason we moved to this area from Houston is to avoid the glut of development and related traffic that
we had in Texas. Please let us retain the environment we fell in love with back in 2010.
My children and I enjoy riding bikes on the preserve and enjoy the open desert environment.
For the animals. We can’t continue to build on their land. They are constantly being pushed out. This earth
cannot sustain all the building
I am signing this because we would not have moved to this area had we known it was even possible for a
developer to unilaterally request a community density plan, carefully and deliberately produced and agreed
upon, be thrown out so a company can increase profit. I question the ethics of a company that would even
propose it. I question the ethics of a local government that would even entertain it.
I moved to this house 10 years ago to move out of the “city” and be near desert‐stop building so much up here!
Page 1220
There has been enough development in this area. Stop crowding out the wildlife.
It is important to keep open lands for the wildlife in the area. Building way too much in the area.
Please don’t let greedy developers have their way!
The Sonoran Preserve is truly the most incredible place to hike, bike, and just enjoy the beautiful desert. Just
driving through brings my family so much peace. For it to be surrounded by dense development and traffic
would steal the joy it brings from to the whole community, as well as visitors who are lucky enough to see some
of our most spectacular views.
This desert area is beautiful and with more and more houses being built, this will reduce the amount of natural
preserve we have to enjoy. I love to hike in this area.
Keep the beauty and peacefulness of this special area. Protect wilderness and cyclists. Cut down on traffic. It is a
rare beauty we cannot afford to lose.
The Sonoran Preserve and surrounding area are why we moved to the North Valley 7 years ago. The natural
beauty and outdoor activities make it our special home. We need to manage and control growth so it will not
negatively impact our surroundings with excessive traffic. Thank‐you.
Enjoying the desert environment is something we need to protect so that we can continue to share it with
We moved to this area because of the beauty of the preserve and the desert areas around us. The area is
already congested with traffic and adding more subdivisions will just clog our streets, increase pollution,
displace animals and ruin the desert. Please do not let that happen.
Safe cycling route
Being able to walk , enjoying the beautiful landscape the LORD make.
The development will increase the footprint traffic and damage to these natural areas and habits. We must look
forward to responsible growth in unity with our surroundings and not just perceived revenues.
Beautiful hiking area and bike riding.
It's going to change the complete landscape of our community. I do not want an excessive amount of traffic.
We have lived in Sonoran foothills for 13 years. We have always loved how quiet it is up here and love the
beauty of the desert. Please do not build more homes and ruin all the great things we have up here!
The Sonoran preserve and Sonoran desert drive are such beautiful parts of AZ. If it is too crowded with traffic
and development it will be taking away from all the cyclists and great hiking trails.
I often go hiking in the preserve for the peacefulness, seeing wildlife, and being surrounded by nature. I bike ride
along Sonoran desert drive and feel safe due to very little traffic. I will be devastated if homes get built on our
beautiful preserve. Animals will suffer, people will suffer, and preserve plant life will be killed. This should not
happen. Preserve means preserve!
This is an essential open nature recreation space who live and visit the area. Protecting spaces like this helps
make this area of PHX metro special, sane, and attractive to so many who use it. It’s therapeutic.
It’s getting too crowded and we need to preserve this beautiful area. It was a purchasing amenity for us that
this preserve would always be left alone. Completely unfair being sold under these terms and then little by
little all the beauty surrounding us is rezoned and built upon.
No wanting any more home delvelopers tearing up the preserves. With the additional Verizon zone site there
will be to many dangerous EMF’s in the community
I live very close to the Sonoran Preserve. My family and I love living near the preserve because we get to enjoy
beautiful hiking and biking trails right in our back yard. The trails are clean, well maintained and much less
crowded than other trails in Phoenix, such as Camelback Mountain and Piestewa Peak. The Sonoran Preserve is
the reason we moved the North Valley. And we moved here based on the growth parameters identified by the
Desert Character Overlay District, which were instilled to safeguard the Preserve. Please don’t alter the growth
density plans, it’s not good for the viability of the Preserve and it’s not fair to the residents who moved to the
area based on the development measures in place.
Page 1221
I believe it is vital to preserve the Sonoran desert lands. The more we build the more we push wild life out of
their habitats and into neighborhoods where they inevitably will get injured or killed. If we keep building on
these lands we won't be the Sonoran desert anymore, we will just have to explain to our grandkids what the
Sonoran desert once looked like.
I very much enjoy the drive through there. Traffic has already increased too much as it is.
We need to protect our beautiful desert. There are many other areas to build on so we can all appreciate the
scenery. After all this is why we live here.
We moved to this area to enjoy the beautiful desert landscape that it offers unlike many other Phoenix areas.
To destroy this beauty that offers hiking, biking, and general nature opportunities so close to home would be
devastating for my family, not to mention the traffic that it would bring. Our neighborhood is already being
robbed of its quiet and peace from the houses already built on this road and it’s use as a through street. People
speed through at 50+ miles per hour to the point that it is difficult for me to turn left out of my gate. I can’t
imagine the impact on this traffic should more homes be allowed through the preserve. Let’s keep this beauty
to enjoy. Things like this are disappearing from the Phoenix area. We must save this.
The safety of low development it brings to being active is a great outlet in AZ.
An agreement was made to limit the number of homes for the area, why now is it ok to go back on that. Will
bring more traffic and ruin to area from overpopulation.
I live in the area and my family and I walk, bike, and hike in the preserve daily. I also see all the animals who live
in and rely on the preserve.
It is my training ground. I spend countless hours a week there riding in the bike lane, running on designated
sidewalks & trails. It is regarded, by local athletes, as a safe stretch of road to cycle on due to the generous bike
lane and limited traffic entering/exiting Sonoran Desert Dr.
This is one of the most beautiful areas in the valley. The trails, bike lanes, and running paths are utilized by a
large number of triathletes. Not to mention the large number of mountain bikers. Keeping this area of land free
of traffic will ensure the wildlife can thrive.
Taylor Morrison is a horrible company, they’re not truthful and when the job is done your stuck with a shitty
house. I regret ever purchasing a home from them in this area. They’re is a lot of wildlife and having the desert
overlay taken off the this absurd amount of homes is going to cause destruction of the wildlife and their homes.
If we keep building on all this desert there will not be any left for our children and their children to enjoy. Please
It is a spectacular preserve and should kept that way. This area can’t handle the traffic now let alone of more
developments are added.
This road is a cyclists haven, and a beautiful part of the North Phoenix desert. Let’s keep it that way.
I am concerned about the volume of cars, traffic and safety. There have already been fatal accidents for
motorists and bicyclists on that road/area. I am concerned about ruining the integrity of the beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. PLEASE don’t let this happen!!
No need for more development eating up our desert.
To preserve the beauty and nature of the Sonoran Desert
When does this stop? We have a responsibility to our next generation of children to save our desert for them to
enjoy. Take the building elsewhere. PRESERVE what is left of our precious desert
Marcella Mccormack
The Sonoran Preserve is a beautiful area that lends this neighborhood a great amount of character and appeal.
Over‐development would greatly detract from this, leaving it just another sprawl.
I want it to remain natural. Don’t want more noise, development coming to the area.
Cycling and hiking in the area
We need to preserve our natural preserve, too many houses, too many cars.
The amount of traffic increase will greatly harm the ecosystem as well as increased foot traffic in this unique
Page 1222
It's important to keep the preserve as it was originally planned for the future. There is a concern for water
during a drought in Arizona and the Anthem water table is low. That road is very congested with traffic and it's
only two lanes.
Save the preserve
I’ve lived in the preserve area since I was very little. We need to keep the desert a desert, our native animals
are continually being forced to co habitate with humans and it’s not going welk. Continue to give them their
space so that we can all live together without hostile interaction
We moved up here to be away from the crowds and we love the desert landscape And the air quality is better
for our son who has asthma
Save the desert!
We moved here 3 years ago. We knew we wanted this home when we were driving around the home and drove
down sonoran desert drive. We loved that the desert was so close to us, that we were going to live to close to a
preserve that our kids could learn about the Arizona and the desert right out their back door.
I use this area for cycling and running. Additional congestion will make it unsafe for these activities. We are
losing more and more areas where it is safe for recreation. The preserve provides safe space for recreation and
adds value in its current state to the residents of the Phoenix metro area.
Our desert is beautiful. There won’t be much of it left if it keeps getting built on.
We live in a largely unspoiled Area of the city. We chose this location for its natural beauty and remoteness
from the busy‐ness of the city. We enjoy the outdoor activities it has to offer without the noise and pollution we
see elsewhere. Please help preserve this area for future generations to enjoy.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve is a beautiful area full of wildlife and desert vegetation. We must preserve and
protect portions of our desert to keep balance in our environment.
My family and I love to hike this area, especially to feel like we’re away from city life and enjoying the natural
outdoors. That is one of the reasons why we chose to live in this area was because of the preserve.
I urge City Council to require Taylor Morrison to comply with Desert Character Overlay safeguards. We moved
to this area because of the close proximity to hiking and biking and close to nature. This is necessary for
people’s physical and mental well being.
Preserve landscape, Mountain View’s, prevent traffic
I prefer to keep the Somoran Preseve “wild” for all to enjoy. Please stop taking beautiful desert away from the
residents that moved here to be near it.
Please do not ignore the Desert Character Overlay District. As it already stands, the volume of traffic on
Sonoran Desert Drive is quite high and negatively impacting the surrounding preserve with increased pollution,
roadkill and noise. Increasing the number of homes built as well as the traffic flow will greatly diminish this
beautiful and precious land that was so wisely set aside for protection. Please preserve the Sonoran Desert
Preserve values. Once it is gone it cannot be replaced.
I purchased my house on the southern boundary of Sonoran Gate with the intent of enjoying the serenity of the
desert in my backyard. This expansion will teplace my view with a 6 lane high traffic road. The Scenic Dove
Valley road will also become increasingly busy affecting outdoor activities such as biking.
I really enjoy living near this natural area and enjoy the hiking and biking opportunities that are available.
It was designed to be protected. It is that simple. There is already too many cars going through that preserve.
My family and I hike at this preserve every week. I take friends to it, have had Girl Scout events, and even
volunteer to clean up the trails. It is one of the most gorgeous gems in Phoenix. In addition to that, numerous
animals call it their home. It is not ok to take that away from the people of Phoenix.
Page 1223
While the continued expansion of homes and building into this area is inevitable and needed, the maintenance
of the Desert Character Overlay is important to keep the beauty and feel of this area. The residents who live
here moved here for a reason, and we appreciate the forethought that went into the Desert Character Overlay
originally. Please do not abandon this. It would be one thing if the builder were building reasonably priced
homes to assist with the affordable housing shortage, but they are not. This request is purely for the financial
advantage of the builder and the detriment of our community.
The Sonoran preserve area is vital to providing a habitats for all the wonderful creatures and wildlife in the area.
It also provides for great walking trails for people to enjoy and get exercise while exploring all that Arizona has
We love the natural area of Sonoran Preserve! Adding more homes is going to take away the beauty of this land.
We cannot allow new developments to destroy our desert.
I hike and bike there regularly. Maintaining “green space” in the area is important for Phoenix’s overall well‐
being/balance.
The infrastructure is not setup for a development of this size and the tax payers shouldn’t bear the cost to
I live in the vicinity of the preserve. I moved here to be close to nature and removed from the hustle of town. I
have enjoyed having wild animals pass through my backyard, but since all of the building along Sonoran Desert
Drive/Dove Valley began, wildlife sightings near my home have decreased dramatically. We are edging the
native species out of their rightful territory. Please do not butcher the desert any further.
All of the building is already over done. It's taking away any part of the beauty left in the area. My family does
alot of biking and hiking in that area and it doesn't need to be ruined with more structures. Leave AZ alone and
stop overtaking anything left. The traffic is insane. Why do we need more of it in the area?! That drive is one of
the last drives left near by that is ALMOST untouched.
There are plenty of areas to do future developments we shouldn’t marginalize the beauty of the Sonoran
I enjoy taking hikes with my family and dog. It is so wonderful to get out of the city and neighborhood to
experience nature. We also enjoy taking our bikes along the Sonoran Desert Drive to safely ride without traffic
and congestion. I do not want to lose this ability to development. There are so many other areas available for
development without jeopardizing the beauty that is preserved in this area.
The area should be preserved for enjoying the natural surroundings.
I’ve lived in the north valley for almost 10 years. I’ve seen the desert in northern Phoenix disappear and the
buyers of this land, though proclaim, they will do right by the desert, they have not. I’m a current owner of a
Taylor Morrison home and I can tell you they made multiple shortcuts and did not take care of the land. I
respect that Phoenix is growing but a lot of the glamour of living here is the beautiful desert not that far from
“town”. I would love to not have to travel further north to bloody basin or 7 springs to merely enjoy the desert.
Please reconsider allowing these desert destroying companies to continue killing phoenix’s charm. ‐ james
I visit the Sonoran Preserve frequently and enjoy the solitude the preserve has to offer more traffic in the
area would ruin the natural beauty of this area. Thank you for considering this petition. Curtis Johnson
Hiking and the overall access to the outdoors
It's a beautiful, natural preserve. It's a generous drive and the hiking and biking trails amid the serene desert are
therapeutic.
The Sonoran Desert is home to many species. It's important for their survival that their habitat isn't cut up by
roads and other development.
I love the purity of this area. Excessive homes will ruin the beauty.
Walking along the Sonora preserve desert in a safe manner is very important for my kids
Traffic on the preserve road is already quite busy during rush hour. Adding more homes will increase the danger
of the road and damage the beautiful desert.
We need to preserve the hiking and biking trails as well as the bike lane on Desert Sonoran Drive to keep it safe
for pedestrians and cyclist.
Page 1224
It’s one of the few roads where cyclists and triathletes have a place to ride together without intersections. It’s
great for the community. I use this road almost every weekend
This beautiful area directly impacts myself, my family and friends, my community, safety, economics, our home
value. There will be a great increase of noise to our peaceful lands. Lights will pollute our cherished dark skies.
SO many negatives, would take me pages to list each one! My fam, friends and I travel roads immediate and
near the proposed area, the negative impact will be immense! Loss of life and property is unavoidable with such
grow! The immediate detrimental impact on the scenic beauty of the area, wildlife habitats and migrating
patterns will be detrimental. The scenic beauty of the area will be lost FOREVER!!!! PLEASE do NOT let the
almighty dollar destroy this area! There are so many other, much less impacted areas of land they can build on!
This proposed change in zoning will allow new development that will infringe on our recreational area. Zoning is
there for a reason. Please do not change it.
To preserve the beauty and conservation of the area, as well as safety for cyclist and hikers.
I’d be like to see less traffic and houses. This a beautiful area, and treasure our Sonoran preserve.
We moved here from Chicago to near a more spacious beautiful desert area. We've watched the traffic increase
three fold which takes away from safety and the beauty of the land. We moved her to be near the natural
preserves, hike, bike and enjoy nature. In the almost 6 years we've been here we rarely see the wild life we've
come to love no longer around. Traffic on North Valley is dangerous at times.
The Desert Character Overlay was put in place to preserve open spaces and promote responsible development.
Develeopers should not be allowed to bypass rules and guidelines. Please maintain the integrity of Overlay
safeguards for the sake of the future of our community.
I am concern about the beauty of the Desert Landscape and more concerned about the increase in traffic that
will be on Dove Valley/Sororan Desert Drives. Besides Verdin there is also the new semiconductor plant going
up west of us that will increase traffic. There is also 2 other new housing developments going up on Dove Valley
and also Sonoran Desert Dr west of Paloma Pkwy. This will also increase traffic tremendously on Dove
Valley/Sonoran Desert Drives. Please be concerned that traffic could increase 10 times the current rate and that
your plan to expand lanes is already insufficient.
It is a beautiful place to take a hike through and be surrounded by natural desert landscape
This is a designated Desert Sonoran Preserve. The established trails are used by thousands and the preserve
hosts habitat for Arizona wildlife including javelina, bobcat, coyote, raccoon, ground squirrel and many more.
There are a variety of bird and reptile species Gila Monster, great horned owl, roadrunner, gambles quail, Inca
dove, Cardinals, spotted whip tail and chuckwalla lizards to mention a few. This area of Phoenix cannot be
expanded into a legislated preserve. Too many apartments in the area has already increased crime, drugs and
traffic congestion. Any additional housing and apartment development requests in the north Phoenix area must
be denied. Respectfully, Bill Shackelford. Voting Resident
Since living in Phoenix this has been a place where I can get away to escape the noise of the city. Please don’t
take that away from us. For a lot of people, having a place to get away to is vital to every day life.
I love all the preserved open desert. If there are rules and guidelines already established for a certain amount of
homes built, we need to stay within that, and stop over building whenever a builder wants to cram more homes
Page 1225
The Sonoran Preserve provides plenty of beautiful hiking trails and scenic views. Allowing further development
in the area would destroy that natural beauty, and for what? More man‐made structures? More roads? Phoenix
has grown plenty already. The city needs to focus on improvements to areas that have already been developed
rather than expanding out more and more. Expansion leads to more traffic, more population, more congestion
and pollution. I for one do not wish to see this grown continue unabated. It would become too crowded to
enjoy any more, and it would just end up looking like every other overly populated and crowded section of the
city. Please leave the Sonoran Preserve as it is. Honor the protections that have been set in place rather than
trying to cheat or work around them. Dirty business practices that do not care about such protections, or about
preserving the environment, do not foster good will among the people. It just looks like you want to make a
I moved here to get away from the high volume of homes and traffic in Gilbert and to enjoy the beautiful
surrounding desert trails and nature paths north and south of Sonoran Desert / Dove Valley.
Our beautiful Sonoran desert is truly a gem in Arizona. Please don’t let the developers for the sake of a greedy
dollar ruin our state for our children and grandchildren. If we don’t stop the sprawl now, who and when will it
We are losing the beauty and integrity of the area that makes the Phoenix valley iconic.
I have been hiking at the Sonoran Preserve for years with my son and my dogs. We love the beauty and the
feeling of being in the wilderness just a couple of miles from our house in Valley Vista. I know our area is
experiencing tremendous growth right now but I feel the area on the preserve needs to continue to be
It's rare coming from Vegas to have such a natural landscape. It's so beautiful to have natural landscape and to
have the desert wildlife around our home. There's plenty of other places they can build and they're building
now. Save the preserve and the wildlife. They can build somewhere else that isn't here.
People need places to live but so do animals. The Southwest has beautiful deserts and what makes this place
The desert beauty of this area is its most treasured asset
The beauty of the Sonoran Preserve will be replaced with urban area???? During the hike or bike ride are we
supposed to admire the houses???
Safe exercise and increased traffic would really diminish the roads safety
We must preserve the natural beauty of Arizona. The generations to come deserve to see the natural beauty
that we have today. It is also home to many of Gods creatures and sustains their lives.
Proposed area would block the migration of wildlife through the preserve which is likely its originally intended
purpose. Also, there is not enough water already….
I want to protect the many plants, trails and wildlife. Please don’t destroy this fragile ecosys.
Acres and Acres of land are taken from the wild life. Traffic is horrible.
Seriously? There is so much development going on right now with the chip pant being built, and all of the high
density housing going in around it, we don't need to get any more crowded. Don't ruin what's left of our desert
beauty. These places are where some of us go to enjoy some peace and quiet and escape the population.
DON'T TAKE THAT FROM US. DON'T RUIN IT!!
Over reaching of dwelling concentration will overwhelm the streets, schools and amenities. Full compliance to
the Desert Charter Overlay District safeguards should be fully adhered to.
I do not want the desert destroyed any more than it already has been, it needs to be preserved. I hike daily
along the trails from Apache Wash to Paloma Pkwy, the scenic views are being compromised by building, the
noise of the traffic is ruining the peace of the outside and nearing running me off the road as I try to cross to the
trails. It's insane the number of cars already and Copperleaf development isn't even populated yet. No more
homes to destroy the serenity and beauty of this area.
I participate in running and hiking in the area and treasure the natural beauty of the desert landscape.
I chose this area because of the preserve and hiking trails. We love the motorcycle rides through the area on our
way up to Cave Creek. I already think they are building too much and it’s going to overpopulate and ruin the
very reason we chose to live in this area.
Page 1226
Preserving the open space, flora, and fauna native to the area
I frequently recreate in the area ‐ it is frequented by a lot of people. Both on the road with limited traffic and on
the trails. It would be detrimental to the foundation of the Phoenix Preserves to take away land dedicated to
open space and letting developers tear it apart. Developers can get land further out on the outskirts of town to
develop ‐ not areas already dedicated as open space for all to recreate now and future generations.
The city of Phoenix is running out of desert space because of so many large communities. Taking away the
beautiful desert or desert character overlay to add more concrete and asphalt among houses is deeply
concerning for Phoenicians, tourists, and the wildlife in the area.
It is a beautiful community! I love seeing people rude their bikes, walk, hike, ride atvs so close by but with more
housing it becomes impossible to enjoy the preserve. Save the last piece of Arizona the beautiful desert and wild
life in Phoenix!
It changes the whole landscape of our community. Every available space is being built and we are losing the
beauty of our area.
Two reasons: to preserve the beauty of the preserve and the hone of the animals living there. Second, is the
traffic. We are already experiencing new heavy traffic with our growth up here and adding this will increase it
greatly. I moved up this way because of the lifestyle it afforded without so much traffic. Along with the traffic
comes more accidents, which we are already experiencing, more congestion, etc.
This will affect the local fauna and flora and compromise what is supposed to be a protected ecossystem.
To preserve the beautiful views of the desert and maintain wildlife and landscape.
I live less then a mile away and it’s a beautiful area that should remain the way it is. We hike, bike, and drive to
grandparents house on this beautiful road/preserve. Please let it stay beautiful and let us continue to make
memories here.
Hiking biking wildlife and beauty .....reason why most of us live up here.
This is an important area to keep Phoenix as special as it is. In addition, the growing drought crisis makes the
option of further building less eco friendly.
The Sonoran desert preserve is admired for its standing beauty. Arizona is Home to tons of desert land scenery
that makes our cave creek town so special. Please preserve this land and build soemewhere else
I live on the South‐West edge of the Sonoran Preserve. I am an avid outdoors person that loves the wild flora
and fauna and am concerned about destroying the natural beauty of the preserve as well as the natural habitat
of wild life. I believe that we need to prevent this oasis for recreation and wild life refuge to be altered.
It is important to have open space for recreation and for the planet. We love mountain biking in the preserve.
High density housing is going to adversely impact what is left of the Valley’s open spaces.
We want to preserve the natural beauty and opportunities we have now to bike, hike and pleasant walking with
families and friends while enjoying the beauty of our Sonoran Desert. So please don’t grant permission to build
more housing communities.
This area is one of the only places in the Phoenix metro area that offers a safe place for mountain bikes and
cyclists to ride. The low traffic and large bike lanes are not found anywhere else in the valley. It is a staple for
many recreational athletes and outdoor enthusiasts in the area and should be kept that way!
Page 1227
I am a third generation Phoenician and have lived in North Phoenix most of my life. I have watched the growth
of the valley over the years and am not opposed to progress but it needs to be done thoughtfully and
responsibly. This proposal to increase the number of homes along the Sonoran Desert drive is reckless and
irresponsible. The developers of the Verdin project are not thinking about the residents of the area or the future
generations that will use the preserve but are rather motivated by the lure of maximizing their profits. I am
strongly opposed to discarding the charter and hope that as our representatives you will do the right thing for
the citizens of this area. Seriously take into consideration what’s best for not only the residents but also the
wildlife and the desert itself. This decision will not only impact our quality of life but the quality of life for those
that will come long after we’re gone. A sea of homes and pushing more and more people into an untouched
area of desert is not good for the future of our community.
Beauty of the natural desert provides peace & tranquility in this world of unrest. Don’t destroy the zen
We have so few Desert Lands left for generations to appreciate
we moved up here 12 years ago because it was beautiful with hiking trails and not overly congested with
housing/shopping/traffic etc. please leave our sonoran preserve alone and stop building in it. if people want
congestion they can move into the city areas thank you.
The open space is becoming g increasingly scarce, reducing not only the lands for recreation but also the
My family and I value the Sonoran Preserve and open desert. We've lived next to and used the Sonoran
Preserve for over 15 years. We mountain bike, run, hike, and enjoy nature on these trails multiple times per
week. The surrounding open desert is an integral element contributing to the peace of the Preserve. We were
dismayed at the building of the neighborhood off Dove Valley Rd between the two sections of the Preserve a
few years ago. Please do not crowd the area surrounding and within the beautiful Preserve!
This area is important to preserve. I regularly use this area for recreation and it is an important reason why I
choose to live in the north valley as opposed to other areas in Phoenix. I DO NOT WANT THE NORTH VALLEY TO
TURN INTO CHANDLER OR GILBERT!!!!
My family and I love hiking in the Sonoran Preserve. It’s how we spend our weekends. We would hate to lose
anymore of the land, the atmosphere, the animals. Please save the land. Thank you
Preserve natura
We all know how beautiful the Sonoran Preserve is. Most of us in this area live here to live close to the city, but
still enjoy the beauty of the desert. As a phoenix native, I’ve seen our desert areas shrink…. Not only do humans
have less area to enjoy, the animals have less and less of an area to call home. This is not okay. We need to
preserve this area. While we understand that land is at a premium right now, there are other areas to develop.
I do not want the massive increase in traffic it is already horrible in this area. We do not need more housing
there are plenty already being built.
We moved up to this area because of the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please keep our beautiful land the
way it is.
The area will not be able to handle the congestion of the cars that will need access to the area. Also there
aren't many peaceful areas to drive through anymore, especially when you have had a stressful day. With all of
the other building happening we can't afford to have another development take our land.
I am a resident in the local area and I’m very concerned about excessive traffic and congestion. We have laws on
the books to protect to preserve I don’t think we need to circumvent them now just to build more high density
The natural area surrounding Sonoran Foothills is a treasure. Doubling or tripling the number of housing units is
detrimental to the beautiful nature and wildlife.
We moved from the city specifically to enjoy the natural preserve and wildlife of this area. Also, we were
assured no building would take place along the Sonoran Preserve corridor. Our family loves to bike ride in the
peaceful desert preserve and request that it remains a preserve for our wildlife and for all to enjoy in it’s natural
To keep the nature as treasure and beautiful view
Page 1228
We need to maintain the beauty of the valley. Areas need to be protected and respected so all can enjoy.
We are concerned about the traffic, congestion and noise that this increased housing will cause
GREED at its finest asking to ignore the Desert Character Overlay District... PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS!!!!
Seriously...one more development along the route is no good. Too much traffic now for those who frequent the
area.
One of the main reasons we bought our house here in 2018 was because of it’s location in relation to the
Preserve. Already traffic has become a nightmare with the recent developments and removing the Preserve will
only exacerbate an already horrible problem. Also, to quote the great Joanie Mitchell, “you don’t know what
you’ve got til it’s gone.” Losing the Preserve would cause irreparable damage to the environment and the
We must preserve the Sonoran Desert for not only environmental reasons but for future generations to enjoy
its natural beauty. When I first came here in 2019 and lived near Cave Creek I would always drive out there and
take in the quiet beauty and the stunning sunsets. We need to protect keep this preserved and natural.
Jennifer Walter
Uniquely beautiful desert must be protected. Overly dense housing not consistent with that preservation.
This would allow too much development and over populate the area.
I moved to this location in 2019 to be away from congestion of traffic and buildings. I am already concerned
about the traffic on Sonoran Parkway/Dove Valley. I love the open desert and trails and lack of buildings. This
area needs these open spaces to remain as building and development is moving closer to the preserve on all
sides. Help save some precious desert/animals/freedom and peaceful nightblack skies!
Urban sprawl is harmful. Preserving natural pandas capes should be priority for the city.
This place is an amazing getaway for families to go walk, cycle and hike. It’s nice to go over there without all of
the traffic that goes through there. It is such a beautiful scenery that should not be taken away.
To prevent additional congestion and traffic and to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
We need to keep our natural surroundings for the overall health of our environment.
Will Ruin the wildlife and nature surrounding the preserve in addition to increasing the already challenging
traffic issues on Sonoran desert drive
This road has given me a safe place to learn to ride my bike, and to run. It’s been vital in my mental health,
creating open spaces like this is so key to us, as we saw during the pandemic. Please preserve it!
Cycling and trail running
The sonoran preserve is a beautiful place that is essential to maintaining the ecological balance for wildlife and
vegetation. The developers and owners knew the rules of the overlay district when they decided to develop,
and should be required to follow it. Not doing so benefits only them, and puts the damages on all other citizens.
Protecting preserve areas within an urban community is important and contributes to a healthy quality of life.
Respectful development along the perimeter of a preserve protects the integrity of the native area. I want the
desert overlay left in place as it is the legal vehicle created with intention to accomplish this. We need to be
forward thinking as we approve developments especially when they border preserve areas that were acquired
and built with significant personal and financial resources!
There is no need for additional housing in our area specifically so near a protected preserve. There is not enough
water so support the additional homes and businesses that come with a development such as this.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve is so beautiful and serves MANY purposes. That's why we moved here, and we
don't want to lose it ! We MUST keep development at a reasonable amount.
We need to preserve the area and keep the traffic in North Valley from getting even more dangerous.
Traffic congestion, pedestrian and bicycle safety. Preserving this area from development, as envisioned by the
Desert Character Overlay District.
Page 1229
Becasue we hike the trails regularly and the feeling of being lost in nature so close to home is special. It should
be protected and I hope my daughter can enjoy it the same way one day.
Volume of traffic will be too extreme and hiking, cycling and just walking will be negatively impacted.
ASU has spent millons in studies, to this DAY, of the wildlife is THIS IMMEDIATE area. The area between these
two washes are a habitat for species that exist NO where else. Contact ASU if you don't believe me, they have a
professor that performs studies out there...they have for many years! In addition, the access roads proposed
are between two bridges that are TOO low. There needs to be a NEW study performed on how the destruction
of the plains will affect run off and increased volume in the washes! Otherwise, one heavy monsoon might wash
the people and homes away.
I enjoy hiking and biking in the area. Houses and cars really ruin the beauty of it.
The Desert Character is an important part of Phoenix that needs to be kept preserved and available for all
Phoenicians and other AZ residents to enjoy the natural scene this Sonoran Desert can provide outside of the
busy metropolis of the Phoenix metroplex and other surrounding cities.
We love our desert and the fascinating wild life! Lets all work together to conserve our beautiful desert!
The builder should be held to the character overlay that is in place to ensure the neighborhood fits into the
desert landscape.
As a resident living at Fireside, I have seen javelinas (up to a dozen at a time) and other wild animals come up to
our home looking for food and emptying garbage at night. By tearing down more natural and wild habitat for
additional homes will only increase the existing problems for the animals in the dessert when more of their
natural habitat is torn down. Stop tearing in to the natural surrounding preserve.
We've disrupted enough of the environment.
To much growth for what this area was set up to be.
I do not wish to see this beautiful desert landscape overcome with more traffic and houses.
The open desert landscape is what makes Arizona unique and beautiful. We need to preserve the beauty.
Its a beauty such a pleasure driving thru and seeing the cactus scenery. Already disturbed by the housing that
has already been built
1‐ more traffic 2‐displacing wildlife and plants.
Without a road plan for major increase in traffic and the current drought in AZ, I oppose developments like
We love the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please protect what is left and save the beauty of the dessert.
The Desert Charter Overlay District is in place to protect the Preserve. We are simply asking to maintain
adherence to it. Other than profit, there is no valid reason to break the Charter. If housing shortage is an
argument, then investors should absolutely look to revitalize and invest in existing residential spaces.
The Arizona desert is a truly beauty that nothing else compares to. Large Cati with blooming flowers, mountain
ranges from every aspect, and wildlife that is crucial for our ecosystem; there’s are just a few reasons that make
Arizona great. WE ARE KILLING OUR SONORAN PRESERVE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION AND HOME
DEVELOPMENTS. We do not want more homes, we want to save our preserve!!!! I want my everyone to be able
to drive down Sonoran desert dr and experience the breathtaking views that I get to see everyday I drive to and
from work. This is truly a special place and we need to keep it that way. Taylor Morrison can go find another
place to destroy if they want to make a quick buck. But I don’t want to see it here
I like living in the city with a place to go(the preserve) where you feel like the city is so far away. I hike, mountain
bike and enjoy seeing the wildlife as well as nature in general.
Ekosystem Preservation of natural wild life
Actions need to be taken to preserve the natural landscapes of Arizona. The degradation of lands is reaching a
tipping point. The area does not have the infrastructure, business, school capacity nor natural resources to
support this development. Corporate greed is advancing the rapid expansion of the Sonoran desert and we are
on the cusp of a major water shortages in the region. Enough, have some foresight for future generations for
Page 1230
I think the peace and quiet and a safe place for the Sonoran wildlife to roam freely is vital. We cannot keep
pushing these animals out of there natural habitats. Traffic on Sonoran desert drive has already increased and
to increase it more is simply careless as families riding bikes will be at an increased risk
It's wrong to ignore our Desert Character Overlay District! We bought our home here because of these
protections, and we love our desert! Thank you!
Sonoran Desert Drive is a road I ride almost every single day. Having a safe road to ride on is essential to what I
do for a living. There are limited roads in Phoenix that have as much open space as this one, and it allows for a
safe area to bike and run (on roads or trails). Being a dad, this is extra important because all too often there are
unsafe interactions with cars on various other roads. Sonoran Desert Drive and it's surrounding area is a key
place to experience the outdoors in a safe environment.
We moved up to the area because there was space and open land. We don’t want to live where people are on
top of each other and traffic is out of hand. Don’t ruin our beautiful space.
We need to preserve the natural beauty and wildlife that call the desert home.
This city is growing so fast & we need to preserve some of the beautiful desert landscape. If we keep building
more houses, we will have nothing left. We don’t need more houses!!
We are overbuilding this area. Traffic, water supply, pollution are all contributing factors to limit growth. In
addition, the limited wildlife will be severely impacted
The Preserve was the reason we moved here 14years ago. The city should not be able to re‐zone and stick with
the original plan to leave it for hiking biking etc. There is plenty of land on the west side of I‐17. Way too
much growth, traffic, and Desert lost to developers. with NO regard for the quiet life we enjoy In north Phoenix.
The preserve gives us hiking trails and allows everyone to enjoy the beauty of the Arizona desert and wildlife. It
would also dramatically decrease property values for the people voting for you to remain in office.
Living in the development of Sonoran Desert I am concerned with future development and keeping the natural
environment. We need to ensure that proper development is planned to avoid over growth and increased
This project has the ability to set precedence for any other development. The fact the developer is asking to
refine for more houses and remove the desert overlay is a slippery slope to having high density homes stacked
on what is one of the mist beautiful areas of desert. It is too dense, goes against city plans meant to protect the
desert character of north Phoenix and will bring an influx of traffic to the area. Please look at giving up some
land somewhere else that is not across from a beautiful nature preserve.
Love the beauty of the area. So peaceful to drive along and see the plants and trees, which would be lost
forever with more housing. Please save this beautiful area for our children and all those who come after them.
I drive this road regularly and it’s already getting over populated with traffic with the current development.
More housing and construction will take away the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and will also
increase unwanted traffic.
The preserve to me is a natural area for hiking and biking. There is already a lot of traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive making this dangerous to road cyclists.
I spend a lot of time in this area due to the beauty and the ability to get away from “the city”. I really love this
area and it’s one of the rare spots we have close to Phoenix.
The Sonoran preserve is a refuge for city dwelling people to escape into nature. It also, and most importantly, is
a sanctuary to native plants and animals. It's a critical part of the Phoenix ecosystem.
Destroying the beauty, and traffic concerns.
Once the natural land is gone we loose the gorgeous desert that many people move here for. Pollution has
gotten much worse in the past few years. More home mean more traffic and even worse pollution. The water
table is getting lower and more homes mean more water usage. We don’t have water for them!
Page 1231
The Sonoran Preserve along Sonoran Desert Drive allows us close appreciation of the scenic desert and its
thriving ecosystem. Other parts of the valley are better equipped for growth and infill. We need to embrace
density where the city is more prepared to support it. This patchwork sprawl into the outer reaches of the
desert chops up the expanse of habitat unnecessarily. If it continues, we can only look forward to small patches
of desert brush between homes as opposed to miles of our unique desert that we can all enjoy.
We value the beauty of the preserve and feel strongly it should be maintained.
The Sonoran Preserve is beautiful. Any development should avoid damaging this precious ecosystem. In
addition, traffic on Dove Valley Road and Sonoran Desert Drive is already heavy and the 45 MPH speed limit is
mostly ignored by drivers. I worry that this roadway will not be able to handle the additional traffic from new
Traffic, keep the beautiful desert, water resources
I have lived in this area for over 16 years and am a native Arizonan. The City has done a wonderful job on
Sonoran Desert Drive, in terms of incorporating areas to recreate and enjoy the unbelievable desert scenery
within the Sonoran Preserve. I have hiked the area and marvel at the beauty. Increasing the planned housing
units by multiples of two or three will significantly detract from the area's beauty and tranquility and add an
unsustainable amount of traffic and introduce ecological damage to the area. There is a reason so much land
was designated as a preserve all those years ago. It should stay that way.
I believe there are multiple reasons for keeping our views for all to enjoy ‐ to preserve the desert and the
animals ‐ so we can enjoy the solace in this wonderful area by walking, biking, driving or just plain relaxing in the
outdoors. Also driving on this Sonoran stretch of road currently needs more restrictions ‐ such as traffic lights at
all intersections for turning. Much speeding ‐ need to have more monitoring of speed requirements. Adding
more housing is just going to add to a lose of the desert preserve and impossible street/road conditions. When
we built our home here, we were told that there were restrictions to keep our desert preserved.
I love being able to enjoy the beautiful preserve without all the traffic. The preserve is what makes city living do‐
Pavement is forever and we’re losing our natural habitats
I live near this area and use it all of the time. Love it! The area is getting congested already and it’s starting to
ruin this special area/space we have available to us to enjoy nature.
I am signing this petition for multiple reasons ‐ we do not have the proper roadways to support additional
housing units and want to preserve the beauty of the region
We need to preserve the beauty of our natural habitats. There are already plenty of places that are zoned for
building. Please do not let greed ruin our neighborhood.
The Sonoran Preserve is absolutely beautiful and filled with flora and fauna unique to the area. Sonoran
Preserve should remain natural for the benefit of the critters who live there.
Would like this preserved with desert lands as much as possible
I walk the puppies in this area and would be a shame if the sanctuary of this Area was ruining forever. Many
people enjoy the beauty
Preserve the desert hiking areas.
It is very important to retain our natural desert and the Sonoran Preserve.
Preserving the Desert Character Overlay District is essential for sustaining the quality of life in & near the
Sonoran Desert Preseve.
I am very concerned about the additional traffic volume that will be a result of large Verdin community. I am a
triathlete who uses Sonoran Desert Dr. daily for training and with the increased traffic I fear for my safety. In
addition, we moved to this area (85085) for the beauty of the desert. Abandoning the Desert Character Overlay
District will eliminate the protections that were placed to ensure conservation of the ecosystems in the area
while still allowing for some development. The large number of homes the Verdin development company
proposes to squeeze into this area will detract from the wilderness and beauty of the Preserve. Yet, another
area of concern would be the overcrowding of schools in the Deer Valley School district.
Page 1232
The Donoran a preserve is a peaceful area used by many people for hiking, mountain biking and horseback
riding. Adding more houses will increase the number of people using the trails as well as create more traffic in
To adhere to our natural landscape and preserve the area and its wildlife.
The Sonoran Preserve is important to me to have beautiful open desert to see wild life, teach our children how
to respect desert nature and it’s in my backyard. With more cars on the road I fear reckless driving and fires
from through in things out the window.
I live on Dove Valley and the traffic is already horrendous. We also love driving "the back way" when we're
headed to Scottsdale for the scenic route. We would hate to see that go and hate for it to be filled with more
homes than are currently allowed (none would be the perfect amount in my opinion). The schools are already
far too filled for the existing amount of homes and the roads were not built for the amount of traffic that
currently passes through on a daily basis. There are so many reasons to not allow more homes!! We moved up
here to be away from the millions that live in metro and we'd like to keep it that way.
Beauty, Congestion, MTB trails
Please save the desert preserve, this is very important! Thank you
The desert in the Sonoran Desert Preserve is already quite overused by hikers, bikers and equestrian riders. By
increasing the population adjacent to this preserve, not only will it lose its true wilderness experience, but it will
have increased urban pressures placed upon it, threatening its very existence. Additionally, as I live just meters
from Dove Valley Trail and witness the already heavy traffic along this corridor that connects to Sonoran Desert
Drive, any increased volumes in traffic would effectively make it very difficult to exit my community onto Dove
Valley Road where no traffic lights exist.
I moved to North Phoenix because of the untouched natural beauty of the desert that hadn't been devastated
by "progress". Humans need areas of Nature to decompress and renew their spirit, crushed by the rigors of life.
Unfortunately, we lost an area of the Preserve, including the wildlife, to an enclave of large houses. It's
unfortunate that money trumps all. I elect people who rise above lure of the almighty dollar to do what is right
for the Earth and her people. Please honor the intention of The Preserve.
This is so important to protect the natural beauty, wildlife, ecosystems, and quiet quality of life that draws
people to the area and the state in general. Please act to prevent the potentially irreparable damage discarding
these safeguards could cause!
I have lived in this area for 17 yrs. and we are raising our daughters here. My family enjoys the trails and hiking. I
am also a teacher at on of the neighborhood K‐8 schools. Our school is busting at the seams even before all the
new construction being completed. You can't keep overloading the schools and roads to crisis points.
To preserve the preserve!
I mountain bike this area at least twice a week and do not want to see the area changed. It is already crowded
on the weekends
Living by the beautiful Sonoran Mountain Preserve area and Sonoran Desert Drive, allows people to interact
positively with nature and the environment. This is necessary for people’s physical and mental well being,
which we all rediscovered during the pandemic when it was one of the few things people were allowed to do.
The Mountain Preserve allows people to connect with nature and enjoy the peaceful outdoor environment. The
people in the area love the open spaces and serenity that the Sonoran Desert Mountan Preserve provides. They
walk, bike or hike in the neighborhood everyday. If these developers are allowed to over develop this beautiful
area it will be a detriment to the already established neighborhoods by increased population through clustered
housing, traffic, safety, noise levels, over crowded schools, and a host of other issues. This mountain preserve is
vital to the well being and safety of people who chose to live for here for a better quality of life. Please don’t
allow these developers to destroy the Mountain Preserve. Thank you
Bike safety Road overly congested
Natalie Karis
Traffic is already heavy and dangerous for my wife who bikes and myself walking
Page 1233
Safe road for training and being outside.
When we moved to Arizona nearly 7 years ago, we chose the Sonoran Foothills neighborhood because of the
surroundings. We did not want to live in an overdeveloped area in more developed parts of the valley. We enjoy
our trails and open desert and do not want them further disrupted by overriding existing protections.
We need to build green and stop destroying conservation areas. We are at a crossroads and our choices should
be with the thought of future generations in mind. The next generation already has a lot of cleanup to address
ASAP to avoid climate collapse.
I am an avid hiker. I enjoy being able to see nature, plants and animals. We are already taking so much natural
habitat from desert life. Overcrowding the preserve area increases pollution by humans and their machines.
Furthermore, light and noise pollution create additional issues. Please conserve our preserve.
We need to preserve the preserves; that’s why they’re called preserves.
I’m an avid road cyclist and cherish this well‐paved, lightly‐trafficked road with a bike lane.
This is a great place to hike and enjoy the beautiful desert landscape. The city planners and council are ruining
the desert plus there is no thought of water shortage when these zoning changes are made.
My favorite thing to do is head out to the preserve with my husband. It is absolutely breathtaking. Until we
noticed the houses being built. And now you want to do more!!! No, building more houses doesn't add to the
environment it only takes away the beauty and safety of our desert wildlife and plants. At some point we won't
be able to call this area a preserve, we will be calling it a mini mall. Noise, air, and light pollution are what's in
store for us if building continues to expand. When will it stop, when there is no desert remaining? It's very sad
and I hope this idea will be reconsidered immediately.
Urban sprawl is unnecessarily destroying the last of our pristine Sonoran Desert and taking away the homes and
food sources of so many of our unique birds, plants and animals found only here in the world. The roads and
increased traffic to these massive developments are also harming our wildlife. Please stop urban sprawl and
stop these densely‐zoned mass developments that are not consciously designed to assimilate into the desert
environment, but rather harm wildlife, replace natural habitat and increase global warming. It’s essential that
the preserve remains what it was intended to be—development‐free and protected for future generations to
I hike there regularly. Open spaces are important and our beautiful desert is becoming too full of dense housing
I ride my bike up and down the parkway with countless other cyclists 3‐4 times per week.
As local residents, my family loves to hike at the Apache wash trailhead and the trails behind Sonoran
foothills/Fireside. My family’s Christmas pictures have been taken in the surrounding desert for years. All the
surrounding neighbors have the desert overlay, which is more important than ever with the water shortage in
Phoenix. If you plant the appropriate trees, cactus etc., NO WATER IRRIGATION is needed. Our trees were
watered deep for the first two years, then turned off. 15 years after NO WATER, beautiful and thriving. You have
my address, drive on by. PLEASE keep the beautiful desert overlay our Sonoran Preserve deserves.
I enjoy hiking at various times of the year on the trails in the Sonoran Preserve. I’ve seen an owls nest, lots of
birds, turtles, and cactus of all kinds in all stages of bloom. There is presently no noise pollution and the area is
pristine. I want it to remain as such for future generations to come, not just in my lifetime.
Preserve‐ should be just that preserve. Preserve the natural Sonoran desert as much as possible. This
development would not only take away so much of our desert beauty but also the wildlife habitats & wildlife
would be greatly affected.
Beautiful desert! Everything doesn’t need to be destroyed and built up
Page 1234
Not only do I enjoy the scenic view along Sonoran Desert Drive, but I strongly believe our future to continue to
live in Phoenix depends on limiting new developments the number one reason being our limited water supply.
We are already in water crisis. How can we continue to develop and build and be able to meet our water needs.
This is scary for already established residents. How will my home value be impacted if there is no water? My
second concern for this development is how it will impact my home value. With increase in traffic, and
development of additional major roads right by my house obstructing views and increasing noise levels, my
home value will most likely be negatively impacted. My house backs up to the beautiful desert and as homes
continue to be built in the desert, our view continues to diminish. Lastly, so many animals that live in the
Sonoran desert will be displaced. With so many developments currently taking place in this area, the animals
have no where to go. We are destroying our habitats, which will further contribute to climate change,
continuing droughts, increasing fires making this location less desirable to live.
The beautiful hiking biking and walking trails!! What they are proposing is way too many homes for in the
middle of the preserve!!
I am concerned about the increase in traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley roads. I would like to see
this portion of the desert remain protected.
I use the area weekly running and hiking. It is a beautiful diverse area with wildlife and plant life. Also concerning
is water shortages. The area needs to be preserved.
I live near this area and enjoy hiking the mountain preserve. I also enjoy diving through Sonoran dessert drive
to see the beautiful landscape our state has to offer without having to drive so far away. Please don’t take this
I love in the north valley and frequent the Sonoran preserve. Limiting building saves the aethetics of the
preserve and limits traffic.
I enjoy the beautiful views of the desert every time I drive on Sonoran Desert Drive. I do not want this land to be
taken away from animal species and used to build even more houses.
I use our hiking and biking trails daily and the added housing has added massive amounts of traffic and it’s
extremely dangerous for pedestrians and bikers not to mention the natural beauty and quiet of our desert is
being destroyed. There are way too many apartment complexes and houses being built up here. Its getting way
too crowded and congested and the litter is also getting out of control. Thank you for organizing this petition!
1. There has been poor oversight with planning roadways to keep up with the existing development in the
Sonoran area. 2. Sonoran Desert Drive is supposed to be a scenic drive and is utilized by many cyclists and has a
gorgeous walking path. The increase win traffic will be a further danger to cyclists and pedestrians. 3. Many of
us have to keep moving further and further out of the city to get away from all the Phoenix traffic and live in a
peaceful community. The existing planning with the “water project” has been a nightmare with construction and
took 8 months to complete. We already have problems with adequate water in our area and other areas of
Phoenix area under water restrictions. Where is all the water going to come from to support all of these houses.
5. Schools are already overcrowded and there is already a problem with staffing for school buses and teachers.
How are we going to support an increase of additional kids and families when we cannot support the ones
already living here adequately?
Too much housing buildout, need to slow down a little
This stretch of road is the safest and most beautiful stretches of uninterrupted roads for cycling in the valley.
Please save it
I am for protecting as much land as possible and conserving water.
Keep the desert the desert and keeping it natural where I bike and hike
I will not vote for an elected official that allows this to happen
We need to preserve the beauty of the desert.
We have enough housing in our area. Please keep the land open so that families can continue to enjoy our
Sonoran Preserve.
Page 1235
I have children and grandchildren, outside the gates, it's TOTALLY UNSAFE TO RIDE BICKES, TRAFFIC IS
ABSOLUTELY 💯 INSANE WHATTTT IF IT WERE YOUR NEIGHBOR HOOD? Thank you
We moved here to be next to open desert and away from valley traffic. Increasing to the proposed
developmentm will eliminate both of these coveted features!
Quality of Life will be destroyed! Let us start with habitat destruction. Then let's discuss the water shortage.
September 2021, it was reported that the Bureau of Reclamation has declared a water shortage on the Colorado
River, which means that Arizona, along with Nevada and Mexico, will get less water than normal by 2022. If we
continue to destroy our desert with unnecessary development for the sake of the almighty dollar then we might
as well lift all restrictions. When will it end? When is enough growth enough? Maricopa County was the number
one county in the nation for growth in the past year. This needs to stop! We are destroying our human habitat
by allowing these developers to bully their way into these areas. Now let's discuss safety? Look at our Police
Dept or lack thereof. We can't sustain this ridiculous growth. Please do what you can to help preserve our
beautiful Sonoran Preserve!
This is a safe place to bike and hike. The balloons are beautiful to watch there. Let’s keep the open space
Already getting too crowded in the area. And the desert preserve is in jeopardy.
I use the area all the time for hike, bike and great out doors
Standards are acceptable as they are set. I have many safety concerns through that Corridor. This is purely profit
over planned and locals paying the price.
I know that growth in our area needs to happen but it shouldn’t be so much that it take away from the Preserve
and the reasons we moved here.
I live in Sonoran Gate. I hike Apache Trail.
We enjoy hiking, biking, and taking beautiful nature photos! Please don’t pollute our beautiful desert with more
needless building!
The beauty and sanctity of Sonoran preserve and the surrounding area is vital to our wildlife and maintaining
there habitats is crucial to these animals that are being continually uprooted by builders and developers greed.
Traffic is already increasing on Sonoran dessert drive and frankly adding more homes will make it more
dangerous for people trying to enjoy the beauty nature is already providing us. We cannot keep destroying
Arizona’s natural beauty just to pad the pockets of a few and bring in more people to an already overpopulated
area, where policing these areas is challenging already for our stretched to the limit police force. Stop building
and start enjoying the beauty that our Sonoran preserve is providing us.
We have so many current issues with water, traffic, maintaining the Desert habitat and nature. Each night we
have dozens of javelinas emptying garbage cans and in the yards in the surrounding neighborhoods. When more
dense housing takes place the displacement of animals and wildlife will cause more problems for existing
Phoenix residents. Thank you for not adding more units. It’s irresponsible.
Sonora Desert Drive is a highlight of living in the area, and provides a safe place to walk and bike near the
preserve. For those of us who live along the road, this is a matter of peace and safety, but for our wildlife, this is
a matter of survival. Allowing the Verdin development company to increase the number of planned housing
units would increase noise and traffic, endangering cyclists in the bicycle lane and make it unnecessarily
dangerous for the wildlife of the Sonoran Desert Preserve to cross the road.
The drive through the preserve is truly a beautiful drive. With more houses comes more traffic which will take
away from the beauty and wildlife of the preserve. It is called a preserve for a reason.
The beauty of this Preserve area should be PRESERVED. There is a reason why the DCOD exists.
Page 1236
The natural landscape of the Sonoran Desert must be preserved so that all may enjoy its true beauty and the
rewards of living in the desert. It takes courage and decisive action to prioritize the natural land over
development yet it is a gift you provide to countless generations. Protecting the preserve is action toward a
meaningful legacy. Please honor the desert preserve and say no to more development in this rare and special
area of Phoenix. With hope and gratitude, Krystal Mazzola Wood
We moved here for the a handful of reasons, one of them was the beauty of the state. But that seems to keep
getting chipped away, literally.
We only get one chance to maintain the character of our community. Once altered, there is no going back.
What comes after houses? Walmart, McDonald's, Circle K. Build on the west side of I‐17!
I bought the house for privacy and quietness. The sound from the cars already are a issue, the amount of
roadkill is brutal and water shortages have began. Taylor morrison has so many issues with the houses in
Sonoran gate , they are not prepared for this project. Pollution and traffic is just not right in this area. Why
wouldn't they build on the area on cave creek road. It's open, houses have no issues. This seems the state is
taking money to push this project through. Who's paying for the roads and why would you put a road up by the
state hiking trails. This ruins the landscape !
I live in the area. I don’t want to see any further development in the Sonoran desert preserve area. I ride my
bike through there and drive through there frequently. I have already noticed how dangerous it is for bicyclist
and that road is becoming extremely congested. Adding a new development will only make matters worse.
We are loosing preserve land left and right. We need to keep the preserve the way it is. Plus not to mention all
the traffic and extra water for all these new builds.
My main hiking spot, beautiful views, would think u are out in the wilderness
Less people in the area
Resource impact and cyclist safety
Keeping the integrity of the preserve intact while allowing current hiking, biking, and traffic levels to remain the
Keep the desert!!! One of the reasons why I love where I live is the Sonoran preserve!!!!
Deserts are fragile environments/ecosystems and overcrowded land use will create problems that will take
generations to correct. Native species need to have their environment protected.
This is a safe route for cyclists as it has little traffic. More and more cyclists are getting hit by motorists all across
Arizona and this is one of the only place cyclists feel safe. It’s also one of the only roads in Phoenix where you
can see the beauty of the desert.
I spend a great deal of time hiking and biking there. The north valley is quickly being developed and it would be
nice to at least have this area remain what it was intended to be…a preserve. Thank you
This area is already over populated..the increase in housing will put a tremendous strain on our wildlife and
surrounding areas
The additional housing adds too much traffic for safely using the bike lanes and takes away the hiking and biking
trails that all surrounding neighborhoods use currently. Move housing to the west side of the I‐17 where
commercial land is being used and not recreationally used like the Sonoran Preserve. The fact that the area is
already called a preserve is reason enough not to build on it.
The scenery is beautiful along Sonoran Desert Drive and to see sections of it being developed for housing
projects will take away from the beauty that we have all come to love about this area.
We use the preserve for hiking and horseback riding. Heavy traffic volume can create a hazard for horses, even
at a distance.
Need to preserve the Sonoran desert. Too many greedy developers that don’t care since they probably don’t
live here.
Page 1237
We need to stop doing things for the sake of the bottom line. We have destroyed enough of our natural
environment for the sake of exploitation, and disregarding something that has been set in place creates a
precedent for this to continue arbitrarily. People move their families to areas like this because of the
environment around them. If we wanted to live in the middle of the city, we would live in the middle of the city.
Allowing this to continue will greatly reduce and diminish the purpose & meaning of preserved & protected
land, as well as the ability by which we are able to enjoy it in it’s natural form ‐ mitigating the full purpose
We have been enjoying the Sonoran Preserve and Sonoran Desert Drive for many years. We go hiking as a
family and with my daughter's school all the time. The drive is so peaceful and beautiful. We were so
disappointed when some houses were built there and now more are planned. I urge you to stop this from
happening and keep the serenity of this special preserve. Thank you.
As a resident of a nearby community I am concerned that the traffic that will be generated by the proposed
Verdin community will present many safety concerns. The Preserve provides a tranquil environment that will
most likely change dramatically in character if this densely populated community is built. I don’t mind some
building along the route but only if it is not populated as densely as some of the surrounding developments.
Traffic along Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley is already becoming a major problem. Increased traffic will
make for a dangerous situation for cyclists riding in the bike lanes. Also, the increased density of homes directly
against the road will affect the desert nature of the area.
I Treasure living where there’s hiking, biking and a beautiful drive that gives you serenity. We are slowly losing
North Valley preserves that are affordable to live around. I understand development is going to happen but we
need to restrict and preserve what we all move to the desert for. The beautiful Desert landscaping and
creatures that inhabit it are slowly being stripped away. An example of our desert being stripped away look at
the Legacy Park that was supposed to have been built and now all is left is an empty shell and eyesore to the
community. It has displaced options for the hot air balloons to land. Desert safeguards are put in place for a
reason why are we taking this away??
Please preserve the natural beauty of the Sonoran Desert. It is irreplaceable!! The proposed excessive
development will permanently destroy the beauty of this desert!!
It’s a gorgeous area that exemplifies the desert…and it’s close to the valley. Developing this area is a sad
mistake that we should learn that open spaces need preserved
Traffic and it will ruin the beauty of the area. This is corporate greed
We need to limit desert impact & traffic in the area as it’s already getting congested.
We moved to this area specifically to enjoy the natural beauty of the desert Hiking, biking, and walking is an
important part of the north valley lifestyle Please do not allow developers to ruin it with dense urban housing
Beautiful area! No need to add more housing to the natural landscape. Money isn’t everything.
This land is our closest access to nature. It is where I hike. It is where I take my children to visit the great horned
owl nest. This land is theirs—not to be traded in a land swap where a few people get rich at the expense of our
nature preserve.
I live in the Sonoran desert preserve. Since 2007
I would like to preserve what we have in our area and community!!
The Preserve is meant to be just that——preserved. Excess traffic, construction and increased carbon footprint
will endanger the flora and fauna of our beautiful desert. Please protect it!
We need to preserve the open spaces that attract so many to the area for recreation. There is a lot of building
of high occupancy units and housing underway. Schools are already at capacity, new services are being built on
Jomax to ease the influx, road infrastructure needs to be in consideration to.
Keep the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve desert beautiful with no construction expansion‐ there’s plenty of
other areas to build houses, etc.
Page 1238
I ride and run at the Sonoran Preserve/Sonoran Desert Drive almost weekly. I’ve even stopped on my way
home before to run. This area is extremely beautiful and has the best bikes lanes I’ve seen. I feel safe there
and don’t mind driving the 30‐40min to get there because of how safe I feel riding on the roads there. If you
take that away from me/us where can we go to feel safe riding? Or running? Or mountain biking? Or hiking?
The beauty alone makes you feel far from the city. If you build you take away that beauty. You need to look at
it from a different point of view. Do you know who is out there? The ASU triathlon team trains out there.
Other groups do time trials up there. Take the time to go and experience it and see why we go. I can go up
there by myself, feel very safe yet not be by myself. I can’t say that about other areas. Don’t take this from me!
Desert preservation. Water conservation
As a native of AZ, north Phoenix particularly, I’ve seen the increase in population boom over the last 20 years.
The traffic, noise, crowds are destroying the natural beauty and peacefulness of N Phx. Also… the water! Where
will all the water come from to sustain such a population? We don’t want to end up like Anthem!!
Arizona is growing too rapidly for its own good. The demand for water is only going to increase with these
unnecessary expansions. Destroying the natural habitats of the wildlife that surrounds is also harmful to the
already damaged ecosystem. There is no necessity to continue to tear up the desert to accommodate an exodus
of out of state buyers. They can find a more sustainable environment to live, Arizona is already overly populated
and adding excessive traffic flow to an underdeveloped part of the city is asinine. Keep Arizona wild.
I prefer an environment that is a balance between housing and open land
The Sonoran Preserve is beautiful Natural landscape that keeps the heat down vs concrete, provides
opportunities for walking, hiking, biking ect. Many of the residents in this area including myself moved up here
due to these walking and hiking trails. Also, the traffic on Sonoran Desert drive is already bad and adding more
homes will only make it worse. Please listen to the residents and save the Sonoran Preserve.
Preserving open spaces is becoming more and more important as they are being lost at a alarming rate.
Increasing housing density is damaging with increased traffic, pollution and water usage.
There is no landscape in the United States like our beautiful Arizona deserts. It is critical that they be protected
as well as the wildlife in them!
I've lived on the north side of town my entire life and thr natural desert is why I continue to live away from the
noisy city. The Sonoran preserve has protection in place to conserve the natural environment and this
development is threatening that protection for the sake of the American dollar. We live up here for the wide
open space, peace and quiet, uninterrupted views and opportunity to enjoy nature. The traffic that's started to
grow is threatening this with speeders flying by at 70+MPH, endangering bikers, walkers and nature. Please do
now allow for more development than this preserve can handle and do not threaten the natural ecosystem by
Destroying the beauty and traffic concerns.
I ride my bike religiously on Sonoran Drive and bike safety for our cyclist should be a main concern and priority.
Our family enjoys the wildlife and open beauty that the preserve provides very much.
Natural beauty along with reduced noise, traffic and night lights.
Would cause an overpopulated area that is meant to be preserved for nature. Would ruin hiking and biking do
to the amount of traffic and would become dangerous. Would effect the views and the ability for people enjoy
the scenery. Would also effect the wildlife pushing the coyotes and javelinas into residential areas. Which they
belong in the desert.
The Sonoran Preserve area requires a much more thoughtful approach to any new development considerations
in order to preserve its character and value to all Phoenicians.
it's a natural treasure that is special and needs to be protected.
I want to keep it as is so that we all can enjoy the area and keep the daily traffic down.
Page 1239
As a former 12 year resident of the Desert Canyon subdivision (32nd / Beardsley) I have supported the efforts of
SOS‐P since the rezoning signs went up. I find it deeply ironic and fundamentally offensive that the first ask of
the developer is to set aside law and planning already in place that ensures what they only pretend to espouse
(“ environmental commitment to raising the bar for protecting and preserving the desert environment”).
The drive along Sonoran Desert Drive is very relaxing and calming. I enjoy hiking and I would like it to remain a
desert oasis to enjoy.
Environmental protection of natural areas/habitats, reduce water demand, reduce pollution and traffic
congestion in this area.
We have 2 parks there, we need to connect these parks. People live here for the openness of the land. We need
more open spaces, not more house's.
We moved to this area because of the preserve, and while we support growth, the aspects of the preserve that
can be protected, should be. It is our responsibility to growth responsively!
It is vital to preserve true nature of Sonoran Preserve and it’s wilderness. We can not abandon Desert Charter
Overlay District.Too many housing will vastly destroy this natural habitat.
We moved here to not be so close to continued urbanization. We utilize the preserves regularly for hiking,
biking, and running.
Concerned about traffic increase and noise. We built our home in 2009 in Fireside at Norterra and have already
seen significant increase in road noise and accidents
I bought 20 years in area specifically for the landscape and to be outside the city. We have so many accidents
and fatalities due the EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC. We can’t handle the i flux of cars students business. Phoenix not
supporting all the builds! What makes this area so desired is the preserve!!!
This zoning would be uncharacteristic of the Sonoran preserve and city park surrounding the site.
ABSOLUTELY NOT FOR DOUBLE or TRIPLING HOUSING UNITS for the safety of joggers and bikers, increased
pollution, decreased wildlife, increased noise, and decreased overall beauty of this amazing area we all cherish
and wish to continue to cherish.
We need to have open space to enjoy hikes, trails, horizon visibility. We do not want the Preserve to turn into a
asphalt map.
I often bike on Sonoran Parkway, hike or run from Apache Trailhead. Having this section of town remain
undeveloped allows us an option close to home where we can escape our hectic lives from living in the big city
ant truly enjoy nature's unaltered beauty.
Multiple reasons. Increase of homes will cause 1.) Traffic Congestion 2) increase in air pollution and unhealthy
ozone levels 3) we need hiking and biking trails for physical and mental health. More and more people are
participating in outdoor activities since the pandemic. 4) Phx ( and most of AZ has a severe water shortage and
the outlook for improvement in future is dismal)
Too much housing buildout, let's slow it down
I love where I live and the traffic is manageable. The mountains and hiking trails are beautiful and right now
there’s congestion when I hike with bicyclists and hikers. More people would make hiking and the outdoors
troublesome for parking and just hiking the trails.
The traffic currently traveling on Sonora Desert Dr is already at a dangerous amount. Not specifically due to
frequency or number of users, but due primarily to their speed on the roadway. The current speed limit is
45mph, but traffic regularly travels in excess of 60mph. This in combination with the vulnerable users of the
road and the addition of a significant amount of vehicles is a disaster in the making for the roadway as it is now.
I would hate to see our beautiful desert drive spoiled by more houses. The Taylor Morrison subdivision was bad
enough. The road WAS a quiet area, great for hiking and biking, away from all the congestion. An oasis in the
desert. I live near there and it was such a peaceful drive, but now there is a lot more traffic on it and no one
does the speed limit. Building more houses will turn that beautiful drive into another freeway! Please don’t let
Page 1240
I don’t want the desert destroyed to more homes. There are plenty of housing developments already going up
around us near I‐17 and the 303. Leave the beautiful preserve out of it please
Preserving more of the natural landscape is important. The Apache wash recreation area is a beautiful way to
experience nature and enjoy the area. More homes bring more cars and traffic and noise pollution, disturbing
the natural habitat. There are so few places left to enjoy nature and leave it beautiful. We don’t need more
homes there.
The Sonoran preserve is a natural heritage that should not be jeopardized in our beautiful state. Preserving our
natural resources is vital in maintaining our environment as well as maintaining tourism . It is a shame that our
government is allowing this to Happen.
I want to continue enjoying walking and biking along the Sonora Desert preserve in a pleasant and safe way.
Concerns over traffic congestion, safety, encroachment on the desert and wildlife.
To destroy nature in order to build more homes is wrong. We are speaking for all the animals that currently call
the Sonoran Preserve home.
When we moved from Wisconsin we specifically picked the Sonoran Desert Preserve area because it was so
beautiful and peaceful. Please do not ruin it by putting up homes there. It is a protected preserve for a reason ‐‐
to keep it natural.
I hike the preserve almost every day, year round. Exponential increases in large commercial trucks and
unforced city and state (ARS 28‐955) traffic laws related to excessive noise ruin the wild experience of North
Phoenix' best attraction. When the city pushed Dove Valley Road through the desert 10 years ago, I was a
member of the Sonoran Citizens Improvement Association. At Phoenix City Council meetings I brought up the
noise issue and stated that the city will never enforce the noise statutes on the books, because the police were
over worked and had more important issues ton deal with. An that was 10 years ago before the defend the
police movement decimated law enforcement moral. 10 years ago, City Council told me not to worry, noise
issues would be addressed. I knew it wasn't true a decade ago. And I have sadly been proven right. The city
needs to finish the Sonoran Desert Drive extension off the 303 as per MAG and the city's (so far) empty
promises from a decade ago. I have a long memory. And I vote. https://sonorancitizens.wordpress.com/
The entire N Phoenix area cannot accommodate this influx of new homes without increasing law enforcement
and fixing the road grid. The city needs to be proactive, not reactive.
The preservation of the Desert Character Overlay District is essential to the area, as to limit growth problems
such as increased traffic and desert destruction.
The Sonoran Preserve is a special and somewhat rare piece of Phoenix. It provides beautiful trails and vistas for
all Phoenicians within the city limits. As the city continues to grow I believe we need to preserve these few
natural spaces for all to enjoy.
We moved to Fireside Norterra area for the Sonoran Preserve‐ great trails, and the beauty of the preserve.
North Phoenix is slowly being robbed of its great asset the Sonoran Preserve and overrun by apartment
buildings, traffic congestion and no respect for the great natural beauty in the preserve.
I am concerned with the number of people packed into a small space. Not only would this increase traffic to an
unmanageable level but will ruin the desert in this area.
We love walking, & biking sonoran desert drive. It's nice to be active in that pristine desert. Please keep the
DCOD safeguards active
Desert overlay is in place to protect the area from over development. We use the preserve multiple times a
week as a family and more cars and will make it ever more difficult to access the amenities from our
We live in this area for its natural beauty and we do not want to lose that.
Page 1241
The Sonoran preserve is a spot where I hike, bike and run 5‐6 times per week. I truly enjoy the beautiful natural
preserve this area has. The animals I see during my adventures is also priceless. I truly hope this petition
makes a change !
Concerned about excessive housing & associated traffic density causing problems & congestion. Please do not
override Desert character Overlay District guidelines
We love the beauty and tranquility of the desert.
I moved to this area because it's next to nature areas. Building in this area will encroach on the preserve.
I love hiking and biking the road and preserve. This is a great N Valley treasure!!
This area needs to be preserved as originally designed in order for the members of this community to enjoy a
place to get away from all the over development.
We have already encroached & displaced our very important desert wildlife, my hope is to prevent further
destruction of our desert ecosystem. I enjoy hiking, less pollution, nature and safety within our preserve. Please
keep it that way.
We are in a huge water shortage all over the country and building in our preserves just takes more resources
that we all need to survive!
Why destroy a beautiful, well loved, piece of land when we already have too many houses.
Too many homes encroach on water supply, room for our native animals, will need road expansion which takes
awake from our desert, will increase risk to bikers and others who visit the area to enjoy the beauty.
It is important to me to keep our beautiful desert open and the way nature intended it to be. We are the desert
southwest and everyone should be able to enjoy the beautiful scenery. It does not do anything or anyone any
good to fill it with homes and commercial properties that would only increase traffic, smog, trash and unwanted
things. Our desert animals need their home and do not need to be pushed out due to unwanted construction.
Preserving natural areas and wildlife
Please! We must protect our desert land. For the animals, the plantation, the beauty.
I moved here in 2007 to be near this great preserve and to live I. A quiet community. Adding this much housing
developments will forever impact this natural environment
We need to keep as much of the natural habitat in this area as possible for the enjoyment of all residents and
I hike on the trails of the Sonoran Preserve many times a week, enjoying the beauty of the untouched desert. It
would diminish the quality of the experience by adding more and more housing developments to the view.
Overcrowding is harmful to animals and to people. There are already too many car accidents due to the current
road infrastructure doesn’t support the number of people in this area. Therefore, more growth in this area will
lead to higher traffic volumes and increased car accidents. Thank you for this opportunity to voice my concern.
Greg Laursen
Tjhis is the last strip of Sonoran Desert left in Phoenix. I'm sorrythe preserve doesn't border Dove Valley. Whats
done is gone do not make it worse by 3X the number of people
The Phoenix metro area is quickly consuming our natural wildlife. The Sonoran preserve and areas around the
preserve are blessings to those near them. An escape from the overgrowth of population.
1) safety of those running, biking, and walking. 2). Nature is truly the reason we moved to this area and it is
vital we protect the preserve from being overly developed and disturbing the wildlife in our area more than it
already has been.
Ignoring the guidance set forth by the desert character overlay district would irreparable harm wildlife habitat
and the wilderness essence of the preserve. Additionally, the increased traffic will add more congestion and
safety issues to an already taxed road system, further reducing the usability for recreational activities.
I would like to preserve the wildlife. Also, the road was not built to accommodate that much traffic.
I love to hike the trails with my dog and my family. It is often the only exercise my aging parents get.
Page 1242
Living in Desert Vistas subdivision since it's existence 15yrs ago has been an absolute blessing and we expect to
keep it that way. With that, we enjoy hiking, biking and walking frequently all year around. Over time the
"preserve" area has seen a HUGE increase in vehicles, accidents, speeding, crime, pollution & noise to name just
a few. Our understanding has always been that no further housing/development of any kind would continue
past our subdivision into the Sonoran Preserve. That certainly did not happen. Sonoran Desert Drive is so busy
NOW that adding additional housing will not only threaten people but the natural terrain and wildlife habitat.
That's a resounding NO WAY!
As a resident here, we need to preserve our natural habitat. You need to think about building more schools
before taking over the desert preserve and destroying the ecosystem just so you can make some builders happy
through these deals. If we can't preserve our "Preserve", then what is even the point?
There are many other places to develop. None of those areas are as “Arizona Natural” as the Sonoran Desert
area. Preserve this area for people to enjoy not trash with developments.
The Sonoran Desert Preseve is a beautiful desert area with amazing trails and gorgeous desert. This is an area
full of wildlife. A space that wildlife calls home. So much development has already overrun nature and driven
wildlife out to other areas. We need to the save what desert we can. I grew up in Cave Creek and the growth in
the city as well as surrounding areas has created a space I no longer recognize. Please preserve the areas we can
and preserve the quality of the area as well as the quality of life for the wildlife that we are already driving out.
Sonoran Desert Drive & surrounding preserve area can not accommodate traffic volume due to proposed Verdin
development.
I firmly feel that natural areas have to be maintained and protected in order to maintain the beauty and balance
of our communities. Doubling or tripling the traffic on the Sonora Parkway within the areas of the Preserve will
most definitely create safety issues with cycling and walking for all folks wanting to enjoy the beauty of the
Councilman Waring, please continue to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
The reason we moved here was the beauty and tranquility of the desert. We were not aware of the proposed
‘city like’ community Verdin wishes to build.
Traffic is already becoming very busy along Sonoran Desert Drive. Many large trucks are using this now too. We
were told this area was supposed to preserve the Sonoran Desert. Many people use the bike paths and hiking
paths. I feel it would become more dangerous to use these paths with the increase of doubling or tripling traffic
with the increased number of homes they are asking for. Keep the same number of homes it was originally
Keep some of Phoenix beautiful and preserving the desert beauty. The Phoenix police department can not
handle the calls for service right now how will they handle more traffic.
Keeping the natural desert habitat is better for the environment.
I purchased my home in Sonoran Foothills in 2010 primarily because of the desert character overlay and how
the neighborhood blends in with the natural surroundings. I moved to this area because of the desert character
and would like it to stay that way as it expands.
I wish to preserve the Sonara Preserve as it is and prevent the reckless encroachment by developers to rob the
community of this precious resource we all enjoy.
I don't want all of North Phoenix to become covered by housing and businesses, we need to preserve Arizona's
beauty!
Because of the natural beauty and I don't want anymore traffic...it has gotten worse over the last few years.
As a 4th generation native Arizonan, I adore our beautiful desserts and believe we must take great care in
unbridled expansion of urban growth. This project would place a huge strain on the perserve area, parkway,
noise, and environmental elements.
The beauty of living in Phoenix is having the ability to have open spaces for not only the wildlife but also the
citizens to use the land the way it was intended. There are plenty of other places to build and expand without
overcrowding the desert areas.
Page 1243
I live in the Sonoran desert north of Phoenix, Don’t want it destroyed by continuing building. Leave it in it’s
natural state, so we can enjoy the desert for generations please .
We purchased our home in this area largely because of the preserve. The opportunities it provides for hiking
and biking with reduced traffic (which has increased since we moved) were also key factors.
I hike and trail run in the preserve at least five times a week since I live within walking distance to the Vista
trailhead. It is a beautiful and relaxing and meditative time for me believe it should be left as is like, as I
understand the story, the original owner wanted it to stay, which I agree with.
There are limited resources that we can all share and enjoy. The Desert Character Overlay District was
established to allow for growth but also to protect our wonderful desert. We are responsible for the
stewardship of this desert for future generations.
Need to preserve as much of our beautiful mountains as possible
If we keep building, there will be no desert to enjoy for us as humans, but even more crucially, we are displacing
and endangering the species whose habitats were destroy. Give the planet a chance. Let’s not be the reason
I hike in the preserve almost daily, and would like to continue to enjoy the nature and the solitude. There are so
many other areas to build along the I‐17 corridor, so why cause more damage to the beautiful Arizona desert
and the wildlife living there. I used to hike Thunderbird, but that's a couple foothills with development all
around, whereas the Sonoran Preserve is just that ‐ a preserve to protect wildlife and allow people to enjoy
nature. Please don't allow any more development of the land!
I moved here because of the nature. I grew up in the country and this was as close to it as I could get. I love the
nature and the quiet that we all paid premium dollar for as well
Me and my friends use that area to ride our bicycles and hike and just enjoy the desert and it would be
dangerous with it a lot more traffic out that way and it will destroy the beautiful desert environment please do
I have lived in this area for twenty years and it is getting so crowded and overbuilt. We must preserve open
outdoor space for people to enjoy the peace of the desert and recreation areas that are our Arizona treasures
we use it weekly for hiking and dog walking please please don't ruin this!
The Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive must under all circumstances remain intake and undisturbed
There have been to many accidents and deaths.
Area should remain as it is. Area is also over populated with new homes and congestion with traffic.
I understand that growth is inevitable, but we need to be smart about it. There needs to be a balance of large
homes, apartments, and smaller homes. There have been hundreds of apartment spaces built west of this area
and the increase in traffic has been considerable in the past 5 years. I urge the council to consider keeping this
balance on the north end of the city.
I drive that way home from work most days and also hike in that area.
I am an avid mountain and road cyclist in THIS area, especially! I also hike and run in the preserve. Safe to say I
am absolutely for the preservation of the Sonoran Preserve. I live in an area very near where a housing
development is under way and the amount of houses being built will be over double what was originally zoned.
Please let those that run the show consider the longer (negative) lasting impacts of high‐density development to
what we have all found profoundly beautiful and desiring of this area; the Sonoran Desert!
This would forever destroy the natural landscape and open the door to even more urban sprawl. Please vote NO
Page 1244
Being surrounded by the Sonoran Desert Preserve is probably the biggest reason that we built the house that
we live in now. It is just so beautiful to be able to drive home after a long day's work and enjoy God's creation at
it's finest. It is truly breathtaking and spectacular. Many people flock to Apache Wash Trailhead recreational
area to enjoy this beautiful natural setting through hiking and mountain biking. It would be a travesty to
overpopulate this area and ruin the enjoyment of the preserve for generations to come. It just wouldn't be the
same. Not to mention the destruction of the natural habitat of so many desert creatures that make the preserve
their home. I witness this first hand while living in the Sonoran Gate Community. These animals do not deserve
to be displaced and have their homes destroyed. The line has to be drawn somewhere in order to maintain a
level of natural beauty in our urban areas. This seems like as good a time as any to make a conscious decision to
halt the human encroachment on the habitat of all of God's innocent creatures and keep this little slice of
This area was set aside to preserve nature and all her beauty. yes the land is very valuable but so is central park
in New York. Preserve means exactly that PRESERVE
We love going to the preserve as a family, and having another major development project will only bring more
traffic, noise, and wildlife displacement. We need to do better and protect our wildlife and say no to money
Preserving the preserve ‐ wildlife Traffic and then needed retail to support the development Overdevelopment
of this area
Please leave the reserve as is, for the sake and beauty of our neighborhood and for the well‐being of the
As a local real estate agent, I understand the need for more housing in the metro area. But there are many
other locations that are not in the middle of a preserve. Outdoor recreation and the beauty of the Sonoran
Desert are reasons why people relocate to the area or purchase vacation homes. Having the preserve remain a
preserve and not another housing project is vital to our community.
I use the preserve at least 3 times a week for fitness. Mountain biking, hiking, and trail running. Wildlife
encounters are always beautiful and their habitat must be preserved. The human population density in this area
is already getting to be more than what it can sustain.
The Sonoran Preserve was one of the most important reasons we purchased a house in this area. To continually
chip away at this wonderful area would be so detrimental to the wildlife that live there as well as the wonderful
hiking trails that allow people to get out and experience nature at its finest. I am strongly against ruining
anymore of the Preserve.
My family and I enjoy this land and don’t want to see this over crowded We use this nature and Beautiful
preserve in north Phoenix area.
I see SOME development as good. Let others enjoy the beauty we have set aside in this area. Increasing the
density of homes is merely corporate profit seeking. Original density plans were thoughtfully put in place to
protect these areas.
Have you seen how beautiful this portion of metro‐ Phoenix is. We absolutely do not need more and more and
more. We have enough people streaming into our state already, no need to encourage more.
As someone who regularly drives, hikes, and bikes this area, it’s important to me, my family, my community,
and Phoenix at large to protect these kind of “open/brown/green spaces”. There are plenty of places around
Phoenix for development ‐ the Sonoran Preserve should not be one of them.
The beauty and quiet of the desert and the Mountain views are priceless. This is why I live in Arizona. The clean
air and the wild life are amazing. The wilderness of the preserve needs to be maintained.
Use that area to bike the trails. Want to keep the space natural beauty not filled with homes.
I love the desert landscape, and enjoy hiking on my time off work. I see the amount of buildings that are being
constructed and the traffic it is creating. Please do not destroy the little bit of desert that exists in this large city,
the habitat of our beloved desert animals.
Page 1245
The reason why I'm signing this petition. We are over developing because we have all these people moving from
other states . We are destroying our beautiful desert to please all these greedy business people to put more
money in their pockets.
I enjoy the hiking and the views
Original safeguards put in place by longtime developers who created the Preserve and associated housing
(Sunbelt Construction). They balanced the housing needs with need to create liveable areas that honored the
fragile desert. This request for increased density is about money and is unnecessary for a profitable develoment
effort. Everyone needs to get paid for their work, including developers, but respect for the fragile ecosystem
and desired lifestyle in the north valley is also required. Profits are fine and were factored into the original deal.
Aaron Cushner
My friends and family and their pets walk there every day! Also it’s called a PRESERVE!!! Preserve it!
It’s a beautiful area to walk or hike or bike and it’s the last area I know of that is close to me. Otherwise I’d have
to drive over 40 minutes to find a preserve that is wild and natural
We need to keep the open land and what makes our area great.
I live directly adjacent to the open desert by the Sonoran Desert Preserve, just off Sonoran Desert Parkway. We
regularly see wildlife, and hear coyotes on a nightly basis. This is a fragile and important ecosystem, and is a
hallmark of the beauty of Arizona’s natural desert landscape. If it disappears, it will destroy this magnificent
aspect of what makes Arizona such a great place to live. For my family, the day the bulldozers show up to tear
down the majestic Saguaro’s to make room for concrete & asphalt, is the day we sell and move away.
This drive is very vital for bikers and the natural trails and parks the residents across the city come to enjoy. The
new development across the dedicated Sonoran landscape is going to spoil everything and increase the safety
concerns on the biking corridor. This corridor is used by Olympic gold medal winners , Tour de France
I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for 15 years. I do not want to see my beautiful natural desert destroyed. I like
living in a quiet and not so busy area of town. I would be devastated if Sonoran desert drive turns into another
freeway right next to my house. I specifically moved in this area to get away from the noise and traffic. The
natural wildlife here will also be destroyed which part of the character of this area.
Concerned about too much growth and traffic. Moved up here in 2005 for the beautiful open Sonoran Desert.
Absolutely do not want to see that all developed ‐ we do not need anymore housing or apartments.
The growth in this area is already at an all time high. This small area of desert PRESERVE is why many of us
moved to the area. The PRESERVE is used by hikers and bikers as a beautiful getaway that is in our backyard.
Every other inch has already been developed by apartment complexes. Enough!! Leave our PRESERVE alone!!
It is a beautiful area that has many trails for hiking, biking, geo caching and just getting away from the hustle of
the Valley. It is already limited in access and putting more homes will just congest that. It is also ruining the
animals natural habitat to continually uproot them for a dollar.
I live next to this area and have seen how developments have led to negative effects to the desert. A substantial
increase of houses will amplify this cause irreversible damage to the area.
I have been running and riding out in this preserve for nearly a decade. As I start to see more developing, it
becomes less safe to be active out there.
Increased traffic would make the area around the preserve much more unsafe. We enjoy walking around the
preserve with our children, as well as hiking on the trails. Please do not lift the restrictions on building in this
beautiful area.
Everywhere near Sonoran preserve and desert drive constructions are happening, it’s a very beautiful hike place
to enjoy quality time with family and friends, as a neighborhood resident I would like to keep it beautiful and
not have homes after homes getting built there… there are hardly any community park getting built in the area..
We need to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
Page 1246
This is a beautiful and vibrant part of our community. Don’t destroy it by adding additional residential
development. Once those houses get in there, they are going to be complaining and advocating for commercial
development because they don’t want to drive 20 minutes to shops and restaurants. Before we know it, all of
the preserve will be gone. The hiking trails, the nature, and the area is pristine.
I live in Sonoran Gate. Moved here to be by my sons. One lives in Sonoran Gate also (6 houses away). We
moved here for the beauty and serenity of the desert preserve. Our hope was to continue to grow our family
and ensure our next generation will also have the opportunity to enjoy the beauty of this area. Hot air Balloons
and bike riders every morning. It’s a place of beauty, calmness and peace. Please do not destroy this gift. Thank
My family enjoys the protected preserve and allows us to partake in outdoor activities near home, safely with
our tons of traffic. The noise and light pollution will affect the natural wildlife around. Most importantly the
infrastructure can not support the proposed project.
I am concerned about the exponential traffic increase on the only road in and out of this area with only a single
lane in each direction for a majority of total distance. I remember pre‐Covid that the intersection at Cave Creek
and Sonoran Desert Drive would back up a mile deep during morning rush hour, waiting for people to turn
either left or right. What will happen when the traffic significantly increases? Plus there is only one way in and
one way out of this area. It seems irresponsible to deliberately increase traffic this much without a major
infrastructure change BEFORE the bulldozers come!
I love nature and wanna do my part to preserve the nature where I live. Please control the growth around the
Sonoran Preserve.
This pristine desert area should not be developed, it needs to be PROTECTED.
I enjoy the tranquil drive along Sonoran drive and being able to bike along the road without too much traffic.
The hiking is second to none. I would hate for it to turn into just another neighborhood with traffic and crime
I love hiking in the preserve. Anyone who intends on building anywhere close to it needs to follow the rules.
Our desert is at risk. We need you to protect it by requiring the builder to do the right thing.
Development needs to factor in impact on water and other resources. Water in particular, is a finite resource!
Quality of life is one of the overriding factors in why we chose to live here. The natural beauty of this area will
be severely impacted by further development as will our quality of life. Please put Arizona first!
I love driving on the Sonora Desert Dr. and seeing our beautiful desert. I and my family members also enjoy
hiking and biking on the trails.
Would love to keep this scenic drive the way it is. Scenic.
Traffic concerns and safety for cyclists along SDD.
The Sonoran Preserve is vital to our ecosystem. Without it, the natural biome will be destroyed and the quality
of life for all living things (including the humans) will be degraded, possibly beyond repair. Environmental impact
studies show that further encroachment and development will make the area unsustainable for a thriving
community and eventually, totally unlivable.
The Sonoran Desert Drive is a beautiful natural area that needs to be preserved for future generations. There
are plenty of other places to develop closer to the I‐17
I moved here for the beauty around me offered by the preserve. over the past 5 years I have seen that beauty
disappearing as more and more developments have sprung up without any regard to preservation. It’s
disgusting! Please do something about it and don’t buy into the greed of the land developers.
This road is a quick north valley traffic bypass that remains somewhat traffic free for now. There is great hiking
and desert views. For profit expansion in this area would destroy that.
We live in the area, have hiked these trails, our two boys attended nearby CCUSD Horseshoe Trails elementary
school, and I’d say that in general we have a strong desire to act as good stewards of this land and therefore
have a vested interest in maintaining the beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and our balance with nature.
Its such a beautiful area it would just ruin the look.
Biological and cultural resources
Page 1247
We moved further out of town to enjoy the natural desert beauty and to be away from traffic congestion,
expanding building does the opposite of that.
This is a wonderful area that provides so much to so many people in regards to beauty, quiet, exercise, nature. It
would be a shame to lose all this secondary to over development.
I want to preserve our current area and I bike 6 days a week in what I already consider dangerous traffic to get
to the preserve and ride the path!
The extra traffic flow will affect all the wild life amongst many other reasons.
We are homeowners in Tatum Highlands and use the beautiful Sonoran Desert Drive to get to one of our
favorite hiking areas, Apache Wash Trail. It is vitally important both ecologically and aesthetically to maintain
the Desert Overlay Plan to keep this remarkable Arizona treasure intact with low density, one story, blended
into the environment, natural colors, and with great respect of the surrounding preserve. The developer’s
existing project just to the west on Sonoran Desert Drive is an example of the opposite of this‐ homes close
together, no subtle and natural build character, no boundaries between homes, no blending with the Sonoran
Desert landscape. Sticks out while on the drive or hiking the Preserve rather than disappearing/tastefully
blending in. This is very concerning and must not be duplicated in any way. Please retain the existing Desert
Overlay Plan to maintain the incredible Sonoran Preserve. Thank you Councilman Waring and all city council
members. Respectfully submitted, Laurie Foster
Keeping some semblance of the desert lifestyle is why we moved here. Do not ignore the safeguards. Reduce
the number of housing units. Why do you want to do business with a company which clearly does not respect
nature, but only the economic bottom line ‐$
I travel Sonoran Desert Drive every day because I live right off of it. It is a beautiful drive, but also one that is
very serene and peaceful. I am concerned that allowing the Verdin community to be built at the requested
density it will cause a great impact and stress to the drive through the Preserve. Even if the road is expanded to
more lanes, this road will become a dangerous route for the bikers and hikers in the area, not to mention the
drivers. Please do not allow the density for this new community as requested!
Mark Dotterer
Keep population down to preserve the wildlife
Too much traffic already
My family lives in Sonoran Foothills. We chose this beautiful area because of the gorgeous desert preserve. We
love our out of the way pocket and want to protect the gorgeous pristine desert from further development.
Arizona is destroying so much of the natural land that people moved here for. I don’t want more traffic. It’s
awful as it is. Water is at emergency levels and more homes will only tax the water levels more.
Sonoran Desert drive is the only place I feel safe riding my bicycle in such a busy, congested area. I am full of
anxiety from traffic until I make that turn onto SDD. It is integral to our vibrant cycling community which is so
important to the Valley culture. What’s more is the preserve allows for one of the only true unobstructed views
of our beautiful AZ desert in the busy Valley area.
There is already too much traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive and a community as proposed with no other access
will increase congestion making things less safe. In addition, it will jeopardize the tranquility of the nearby
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, especially the Apache Wash Trail.
It is a very peaceful place to hike. My family goes there frequently. The beauty of Sonoran Desert Dr is so
beautiful it should not be disturbed.
I run and cycle on the parkway and traffic is already dangerous, especially near the passing zones. I also hike
extensively and if many more houses are built, the views will become less spectacular than they are now. In
addition, wildlife would be affected by overdevelopment
Beautiful natural area that provides some of the best riding, running, hiking, and viewing in the greater Phoenix
area. It would be a tragedy to not preserve this wonderful natural area.
Page 1248
Wide open space without traffic & housing congestion, w/o water & schooling requirements is vital to this area
of the Sonoran Preserve.
We are losing our open spaces at a rapid rate all in the name of money. We need to preserve these open spaces
for our future children to enjoy and for the natural animals and plants that were here before us. The increased
traffic and housing will deteriorate the quality of life for all (humans, animals and plants alike). The increased
concrete/pavement will ultimately increase the heat retention which has a detrimental effect on water, wildlife
and plant life. Do not ignore the Desert Character Overlay District.
This area is important to us as we hike and bike. Knowing that preserve will always be here made buying our
home easy. We would like for all development to mind and take care of our desert spaces. There is a reason
the Desert Character Overlay District was created. To ignore this would be a tragedy.
Too much growth and congestion. Lack of conservation to desert land and outdoor activities.
We moved up to this area to enjoy the beauty and tranquility of the area. Now it is being threatened. We
moved up to this area to see our beautiful dessert in its natural habit, and now it's being threatened. We moved
up here because it was a great dream come true, and now that dream is again being threatened by those
wishing to make many dollars off the land and environment that belongs to us all. Please, please let's stop this
travesty. Thanks for reading my input. We just so love it up here and hope for no more growth and
There are so many communities being built simply for the benefit and profit of the builders that little attention
is given to the people who actually want to have both, a beautiful home in a beautiful well thought out
community where the desert we live in is represented and not just the interest of the builders bottom line. Do
the right thing for a change.
I go hiking there to appreciate the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert and the breathtaking views of the
McDowell Mountains and Boulders of Carefree etc.One if the last pristine places to go up here in the N Valley .I
do not want more housing subdivisions and apartment buildings obstructing the views along with more traffic
congestion coming from the constant relentless overbuilding of housing presently occurring .Please save this
beautiful,natural corridor which is used for hiking and biking along with the equestrian trails for horseback
riding.Please allow local residents a sacred piece of land to cherish for us now as well as the generations to
come ,we need somewhere to go that we can take pride in .The Natural beauty of our desert lands is what drew
me to the area 42 years ago please Preserve it!!
It is a beautiful preserve that holds opportunity to connect with nature, and allow us all in the valley to have
natural habitat for wildlife and flora and fauna that are so important to keeping the integrity of our great state.
Sonoran Desert Drive is a crucial recreational corridor for cyclists and other vulnerable road users. It is an
increasingly rare thoroughfare that contains a bike lane, has little to moderate car traffic, has a low enough
speed limit which increase cyclists safety, and is uninterrupted by many traffic lights and stop signs. These
factors make it a beautiful place to recreate and provide a safe(r) place for cyclists to explore and enjoy the
beauty of the Sonoran Desert. The Sonoran Preserve provides similarly valuable recreation space for hikers,
mountain bikers, and other trail users. While further development of this area may provide financial benefits to
the city in the short term, the loss of natural land and recreational space will far out weigh these benefits over a
longer timeline. Further development will further increase the strain on water, further contribute to the urban
heat island effect, and decrease the happiness and mental benefits associated with outdoor activity and being in
natural landscapes. More low density, car oriented development is not the answer to the challenges that face
I hike and bike in the preserve and love listening and seeing all the blooms, wild animals and quietness the
desert has to offer. Please quit the over building that is going on! Preserve our water resources!!
We need to preserve the natural beauty of Arizona and stop over development.
With all the apartments being built on the west end between Dove Valley & Sonoran Desert Drive, the traffic
will become just like the city streets—noisy and congested. Verdin proposing additional homes will make it that
much worse. In addition, we moved to this area because of the Sonoron Desert Preserve which is becoming non
Page 1249
the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards were put in place to keep this specific and unique area from
overdevelopment and should not be overturned due to developer greed.
Vital ecosystems are threatened by too much expansion and development.
I support maintaining the desert overlay requirements for the Sonoran preserve. We need to maintain a healthy
balance between nature and development and not allow these safeguards to be discarded for development of
any current or future projects.
The natural beauty and desert landscape is home to so much wildlife and is also enjoyed year round by current
adventure and outdoor advocates
The preserve needs to be left in tact. The uptick in traffic will be detrimental to people trying to enjoy
biking/walking & enjoying nature. The shear numbers in volume in people in driving on Sonoran Parkway if this
plan is approved is very alarming.
I live here and traffic is already getting too much! We moved here 10 years ago to be out in the desert!!! I hike
on the trails at least twice a week! Please keep more desert!
Too much traffic. Dangerous to have additional traffic where lots of bikers use the bike path. Why not build on
the other side of 17 instead of near the preserve. Help of wildlife not be pushed out even more.
Our desert is part of our lifestyle's. Many of us hike and enjoy our desert landscape. The area is not built for
even 400+ homes, with an average of 2 vehicles per home. Our local school system doesn’t support the vast
amount of new developments going up currently. It’s will also decrease night visibility of the sky in the evening
for those who use telescopes. It will also increase area emissions, pollution visibility, and area temperature.
The Sonoran preserve is just that, a Preserve. It preserves many species of plants and wildlife that is indigenous
to the area. It is vitally important that we preserve this area for our children and their children.
Living in the area I regularly hike and bike in the preserve with my family and do not want to see it get overrun
with more housing developments. Additionally Dove Valley is already very congested, I want to preserve our
desert, Phoenix in general has a water issue, and most importantly the schools in this area are already over
Abundance of traffic and congestion
Please preserve the beautiful desert.
It is imperative we save our Sonoran Desert. There is not a viable reason a developer should be able to double
or triple the amount of homes and City Council should not allow it. The developer does not care about quality of
life or preserving our precious desert, they only care about how much profit they can make. This is a time for
our City Council to stand up for the best interest of the residents of Phoenix and not give in to the desire of a
developer. The proposed development goes against the preservation of our desert, increase traffic, take away
hiking, biking trails and general quality of life for the residents.
With all the planned development in the area, I have a major concern about the infrastructure, and even
planned expansion, being able to support the additional housing in the preserve. Part of the appeal of our area
is the desert beauty, so additionally, overturning district safeguards not only damages the natural environment,
but risks all those that already live/work in this community.
Please do not increase the level of traffic on sonoran desert parkway. The additional cars will increase risk to
current commuters and cyclists.
To preserve the desert for all to enjoy hiking, biking, and the beauty.
Preservation of our land is critical. While I accept development that has been approved, businesses need to
consider the impact to the surrounding area and growth for the sake of growth is not an acceptable plan.
Concerned about traffic, School crowding, and preserving the desert. They need to keep the desert safe guards
in place.
Page 1250
The Sonoran desert preserve is the one of last the undeveloped areas in Phoenix. The abundant wildlife and
topography is one of the many reasons we love Arizona and want to save flit for generations to come. We
access the preserve nearly daily for hiking and for enjoying the outdoors. We urge you to to preserve this
natural area and reject the request to remove the desert overlay in the upcoming Verdin project.
The desert is slowly vanishing which breaks my heart. The Sonoran Preserve should be as it is titled “PRESERVE
Preserving our land for wildlife, beautification and the earth needs to be heard! Enough has been taken over by
businesses and HOA builders. This needs to stop!
Too many houses are taking the little land left we have to see and enjoy the animals and desert habitat life. We
need our nature, we need our desert life. Protect it!
We have overpopulated the North Phoenix area already with many dense residencies, namely apartment
complexes and townhomes. I believe we need to slow down and consider expansion in a different direction so
that we don't lose many of our beautiful mountain and nature parcels that we need to save. I feel this is being
rushed and has not been thoroughly reviewed and vetted.
We moved here from Wisconsin almost 4 years ago. 100% the reason we selected to live up here in the North
valley was because of the Sonoran preserve. We chose to not be inside the 101 on purpose.please don't allow
the Sonoran desert drive and beautiful desert around it to be taken over with cars and traffic.
Sonoran Desert Drive is one of the few places in The Valley that is great for cycling. The grid nature of the PHX
metro area has largely left road cycling and bike lanes as an afterthought, but SDD seems to be an oasis‐like
exception‐ truly a world class stretch of road that has already begun to change due to the development on the
west side. It would be tragic if this preserve was to fill in any more than it already is‐ preserve some of what
We have a young family and love to hike which is why we moved to this area. If we don’t stop this, it will
destroy the area and wildlife.
Too many people and too much traffic is bad for the environment and the people living in the area, like me.
Traffic will likely significantly increase staying within the growth guidelines, so ignoring the guidelines and
increasing the number of dwellings in the area beyond the guidelines will make traffic and life even worse.
I don’t want to see that beautiful desert area ruined with homes intruding. It was already upsetting to see that
area being ruined by the developers greed for money. I say “NO” to the developers!!
I believe honoring the meaning of the preserve is of utmost importance.
I feel that they are over building in Phoenix. Have limited water supply. The traffic is already congested and
difficult to around.
There would be too much traffic and it will ruin the beauty of this area of the desert. There are enough
developments in the area and we need to keep these areas open.
It’s the only road up north not yet ruined by the constant construction (traffic, houses, etc) happening up North
and still the only place where active people (cyclists, runners, etc) can ride/run safely and enjoy a piece of the
desert without housing and buildings ruined the view
Amount of traffic it will bring on a street that is only 2 lanes. Also the reason the street is unique designed for
the preservation of the beauty and for enjoyment for cyclists hikers and walking paths
My family hikes and mountain bikes several times per week on these trails. We truly appreciate this land and
would not want its inhabitants to be disrupted any further than they already are.
The Sonoran Preserve is a promise to keep our beautiful desert pristine. Encroachment of more homes breaks
that promise. The delicate balance of between humans and wildlife is already teetering in the wrong direction.
Let’s save some beauty for future generations.
I am so tired of seeing buildings upon buildings being built in areas that are natural to Arizona. Let’s just stop
this now. It’s getting out of control and species natural habitat needs to stay in place.
I have lived here for 10 years and watched the beauty of the desert being destroyed with development. The
plants, animals and the majestic beauty of the desert is ruined by the continued development until there is no
desert left. It is very sad.
Page 1251
Need Preserve, otherwise we will lose out on the beautiful scenery and have way to much congestion.
Please help us preserve this beautiful natural resource. So often “progress” (AKA Greed) ends up destroying one
precious landscape after another… We greatly value our current way of life. Some of us have made a great many
sacrifices in order to live here. Speaking as a disabled Veteran, I specifically sought out my current home, which
at the moment affords peace, beauty, and a decided lack of city noise. Don’t let a massive influx of absent‐
minded tourists and irresponsible over‐development destroy this paradise. Thank you ‐ Dr. Eric Biscoglio
I chose to live in this community because I wanted to be closer to nature and enjoy the desert preserve.
We do not want the sonoran preserve to be destroyed just to build some additional homes. The traffic is already
a major problem and there is not enough infrastructure and businesses around here to support all these homes.
It's a Beautiful area for our community. Hiding companies should stay within how the area is zoned
We need to protect these lands and stop paving over the natural beauty of this Preserve. There is a reason it is
called a Preserve. Let’s preserve it and the abundant plants and wildlife that call it home!
It’s critically important to protect the preserve and maintain the natural beauty of the area. This is why so many
of us moved here. It’s already not safe to leave the neighborhood with people speeding and limited visibility of
the rolling road. Added traffic would make routine activities no longer enjoyable.
The valley is continually growing and cycling collisions, injuries, and fatalities seem to be increasing, or at least
they are ongoing. I, and many others in the cycling community, feel more at danger than ever before. There are
few places we can go and enjoy long, uninterrupted stretches of road, and still feel relatively safe. Sonoran
Parkway is a frequent choice for us and we enjoy it year‐round. Please preserve this area from development.
We chose this part of Phoenix when we moved from out of state because of the open desert and what that
offered, little traffic, and less people in general. In just 4 short years we are seeing things change for the
negative…reminding us of overdevelopment we experienced in the East San Francisco Bay Area.
Overdevelopment that led to traffic issues and overcrowded schools, just to name a couple problems. We don’t
want to see these same mistakes take place in our new home. And we don’t want to lose the beautiful open
I have lung issues from cycling alongside traffic for so many years and I was struck by a car ladt year while riding!
Having a gem like this is so important! People can enjoy the desert without the noise, pollution, and safety
issues that come with increased traffic. Please, let's keep a little bit of Arizona wild + scenic.
We live along the Sonoran Preserve. We bought here because it was a quiet peaceful area to raise kids and
explore nature. Please don’t allow more homes to destroy this area of nature. It will ruin the bike trail and
hiking trails and cause a lot more traffic in the area.
Ruin of preserve / increased traffic volume
I moved to this area because I love the open spaces.
I walk the desert everyday it is vital to keep it preserved . Arizona is in danger , water shortage , wildlife please
keep preserve
We love to hike this beautiful area. Also the drive down Sonoran parkway is incredible. We must preserve this
desert not only for human enjoyment but also the wildlife that call it home
The Sonoran Preserve needs to be saved, it provides recreation like walking, hiking and biking. Also, it keeps the
heat down. Adding more homes will only create more traffic. One of the reasons we moved to this area is due
to this Sonoran Preserve.
I want to protect the wilderness and essence of the preserve. I thought this land was protected from future
housing development
This would cause pollution dust noise and would be harmful to our health
Climate change
We hike and drive through here for mental health. Please don’t fill more desert preserves with homes and
commercial property.
I’m concerned that continued development will destroy the beauty of our Sonoran desert. It will bring increased
pollution and traffic to the area.
Page 1252
I love exploring and hiking this area with my family.
I am a city of Phoenix park steward for the far north valley preserves including Apache Wash and Dixie
Mountain. I patrol these trails for hiker safety several times of month. The beauty and open desert landscape of
the Sonoran area is a prime reason why people move to this area or visit it to hike or bike. Please do not add
higher density housing and destroy the open land we currently enjoy.
It’s nature. Beautiful parts of the valley have already been ruined by housing projects. This shouldn’t be another
This has been a place for bikers, hikers, walkers, to enjoy and be able to still see arizonas beauty. We do not
need more development in every area. This road every weekend houses hundreds of athletes, outdoors people,
and scenic drivers all alike. Coming up to this stretch of road to enjoy what they love to do be outside away from
the city noise and traffic and be one with the Arizona desert. There is plenty of other great land to develop on
but this road has history and will continue to be a place people want to feel safe and connect to nature on.
Please don’t take that from Arizonans.
Page 1253
Racelle Escolar
From: Henschel Rich
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 5:15 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Comments for May 5th Planning Meeting Agenda items 5 and 8
Hello. My name is Rich Henschel and I live in the Sonoran Gate subdivision off of 7th Street and Dove Valley Road. My
concerns regarding the Taylor Morrison Verdin proposal are primarily centered around the roadway infrastructure that is
currently in place and what is planned in the immediate future.
As you know there is only a single lane of traffic in each direction for a significant portion of the roadway between North
Paloma Parkway and Cave Creek Road. You may not be aware of this, but just a couple years ago before Covid, the
morning rush hour east-bound traffic would back up at least a mile at the intersection of Cave Creek Road and Sonoran
Desert Drive with people needing to go either north or south on Cave Creek Road. Since many people have changed
their work habits during Covid, this hasn't been a big problem the last year or two. However, more and more people are
going back into work and there is already a new subdivision being built out by Pulte and Lennar homes at Dove Valley
Road and North Paloma Parkway. This will certainly add additional eastbound traffic. Now with this Verdin proposal the
traffic will increase significantly with 1200 - 1400 new homes.
The second concern I have relates to the fact there there is only one roadway which services my subdivision as well as
the new proposed Verdin subdivision. You may not be aware of this but a few years ago there was a fire in the Sonoran
desert and Sonoran Desert Drive was closed just west of Cave Creek Road for 2 - 3 weeks. The only way to get to my
home from Cave Creek Road was to drive north to Carefree highway, west until 27th Avenue, south until Dove Valley
Road and then come in from the west. This was a significant detour and added at least 15 minutes to my travel
time. What if this happened again? How would this affect Police and Fire response times? What if a house was on fire
or someone was having a heart attack? That additional 15 minutes could be the difference between life and death.
I realize there is a proposal to expand the roadway with 2 lanes of traffic in each direction with a median in the
middle. However, I have no confirmation from the City of Phoenix on when that will actually become a reality. I've simply
heard that traffic patterns will be reviewed and actions will be taken at the appropriate time. Unfortunately that doesn't
give me a lot of confidence. Frankly I think we already have an exposure and to begin building such a huge subdivision
before addressing this exposure is irresponsible.
Please understand that I am not against land development in general. My father was a land developer and I understand
the importance of offering various housing alternatives, especially in this current housing shortage. But I urge the city
planners to reject this development proposal until these roadway infrastructure exposures can be closely studied and
properly addressed.
Thank you.
Rich
Page11254
Racelle Escolar
From: C Severance
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 10:20 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Desert overlay and Taylor Morris
Good evening.
I am writing to you as a concerned citizen of the Sonoran Foothills neighborhood. I am 100% opposed to the shrinking of
the desert overlay for the convenience of home builders like Taylor Morris. The builders' primary concern is for
increased revenue, which comes at the expense of our beautiful desert and the animals that call it home. Please protect
our wildlife. Please protect our beautiful landscape. Please protect our preserve.
Thank you.
Christine Severance
Page11255
Racelle Escolar
From: Mead Summer, REALTOR, CRS
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 11:08 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Case #Z-6-22-2 and GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Attachments: planning commission.docx
Dear Racelle and Planning Commission members:
Attached is my letter in opposition to Case #Z‐6‐22‐2 and GPA‐DSTV‐22‐2 in their current form. To be clear, I
am not against construction of new homes entirely. However, the presentation made on behalf of DR Horton
failed to disclose numerous issues, and the chairman of the Desert View Village Planning Commission showed
obvious bias toward the builder and against concerned citizens.
Please share this letter with the members of the Planning Commission, I am willing to make time to meet with
any Planning Commission members in person or by phone or computer if they would like to discuss the merits
and concerns about this project.
Sincerely,
Mead Summer, REALTOR, CRS, AHWD
Vice President, Pinnacle at Desert Peak Homeowners Association
Associate Broker, West USA Realty
Certified Residential Specialist (CRS)
Maricopa County Real Estate Special Commissioner
Member, Arizona REALTORS Professional Standards Committee
Licensed Real Estate Continuing Education (CE) instructor
Phone: 480/747‐7255
Email: mead@superiorAZhomes.com
Web: www.superiorAZhomes.com [superiorazhomes.com]
Page11256
pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov
Dear Commission Members:
In light of the misinformation provided by DR Horton representatives and the clear bias shown by the
chairman of the Desert View Village Planning Committee (DVVPC), I wish to bring to light numerous
issues regarding DR Horton’s rezoning application for an area of over 400 acres west of Cave Creek Road
and south of Jomax Road (case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 and companion case Z‐6‐22‐2).
As a resident of Desert View since 2007, a sitting HOA board member and a Realtor who does
substantial business within the Desert View area, I fully understand the need for more housing.
However, DR Horton presented numerous fallacies in its presentation. Some seemingly received only lip
service from the planning committee, others were ignored altogether. Even when residents raised the
issues, the chairman of the committee disputed residents’ claims and, in one case, ridiculed an older
resident because the resident inadvertently referred to Pinnacle High School as “Pinnacle Peak High
School.”
The Stone Butte East development proposed by DR Horton is slated to consist of 1,145 single‐family
homes, a 260‐unit apartment community consisting of two‐ and three‐story buildings, and a 140‐unit
community of single‐family casitas that are planned as rental units. The issues that I take with the
proposed plans primarily concern the traffic that the proposed 1,500+ homes would bring, as well as the
height of the apartment community.
The traffic issue that must be considered related to the level of traffic on Cave Creek Road. Cave Creek
Road has five lanes between the 101 and Jomax Road ‐‐ two northbound lanes and three southbound
lanes. During the DR Horton presentation, the DR Horton representative claimed that the builder’s
traffic study showed that “75 percent of the traffic produced by this community will be going south.”
This comment went unexplained by DR Horton and unquestioned by DVVPC members, but concerned
residents picked up what board members apparently missed.
To be more specific than the DR Horton representative, the traffic study showed, likely accurately, that
most of the people who would live in this community would be more likely to travel south toward the
101 rather than north toward Cave Creek proper. What seems obvious, but what no committee
member ever noted, was that all the people who would go south in the morning on the way to work
would later travel north from the 101 to the new community on their way home. The two northbound
lanes of Cave Creek Road north of the 101 already are overburdened; northbound traffic waiting for the
traffic light at Deer Valley Road already extends halfway to Rose Garden Lane during rush hour. The
addition of 1500 new homes without widening northbound Cave Creek Road to three lanes would turn
this area into a daily crucible for northbound drivers, and DR Horton made clear that widening
northbound Cave creek Road would not be the responsibility of the builder.
Page 1257
My other concern is the height of the apartments. In 2017/2018, DR Horton approached the City about
building a three‐story apartment community at the intersection of Cave Creek and Pinnacle Peak roads.
At the time, I and other concerned residents pointed out, first to the DVVPC and then to the Phoenix
Planning Commission, that all residential communities along and near the Cave Creek Road corridor
north of the 101 were no more than two stories. We argued that a three‐story community would
change the character of the surrounding community – which (somewhat ironically) also was built by DR
Horton. Although the DVPCC ignored residents’ concerns, the Planning Commission voted to limit the
apartment community to two stories and the City Council followed the advice of Planning Commission.
Now, DR Horton again seeks to build a three‐story community that would affect the character of
communities that were built by, yes, DR Horton. Those include Desert Peak and The Pinnacle at Desert
Peak, whose residents fought against three‐story buildings in 2017/2018, as well as the new Stone Butte
community, which DR Horton built over the past two years.
On behalf of my neighbors and fellow DR Horton home owners, I ask that you strongly consider the issue
of northbound traffic from the 101 to the subject area when deciding whether to approve the planned
rezoning and a construction project of such magnitude. I also ask that, at the very least, you restrict the
apartment community to no more than two levels, following the reasoning of the Planning Commission
and the City Council in 2017/2018.
Please know that I am available to discuss this issue with you in person, by phone, or by computer.
Sincerely,
Mead Summer
Vice President, Pinnacle at Desert Peak HOA
Associate Broker, West USA Realty
480/747‐7255
mead@superiorazhomes.com
Page 1258
Racelle Escolar
From: Diana Duran
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 2:12 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Hello,
I am against changing the Desert Character Overlay on Sonoran Desert Drive. The Sonoran Preserve is very unique and
changing the Desert Character Overlay would damage the flora and fauna that live in the Wash.
I also drive on Sonoran Desert Drive and it is only a two lane road and to add 1,250 homes would add an additional
2,500 cars on that road. There are several subdivisions that would be impacted by the addition of all the cars because
Dove Valley Rd/Sonoran Desert Drive is the only exit and entrance for some of those subdivisions. Also there is a
crosswalk Dove Valley Road that sometimes gets difficult to cross as it is today and to add an additional 2,500 cars will
make it dangerous for walkers and bikers using that crosswalk.
Traffic gets backed up going East on Sonoran Desert Drive and when turning onto Cave Creek Rd one can wait at least 5
minutes to turn in the morning. I’ve seen it backed up by at least 25 cars.
I’m not against the building the homes but let’s make sure that we don’t impact the Sonoran Preserve in an unhealthy
way and allow people to access Apache Wash trailhead safely. The infrastructure is not there to house 1,295 homes and
to allow homes to be built without the proper infrastructure would make it a big headache to old and new homeowners.
Kind Regards,
Diana
Page11259
ATTACHMENT J
From: Christine M Pedersen
To: Julianna Pierre; Joshua Bednarek
Subject: FW: Verdin - Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, May 19, 2022 1:52:08 PM
From: Sonoran Preserve
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 11:30:44 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin - Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Dear Councilman Waring,
Recently, I wrote to you about a mailing that Save Our Sonoran Preserve was doing to gage public
support for retaining the Desert Character Overlay District. The mailing was made to a total
sampling of 3400 of the nearly 12,000 registered voters living near the Preserve in District 2. The
area is highlighted green in the map posted
at: https://app.box.com/s/bnui5b5w5ufyqidem2mmwfg0jofh1c6f [app.box.com].
An aerial showing where our 1100 petition signers are located can be viewed
at: https://i0.wp.com/ceds.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Save-Our-Sonoran-Petition-Signer-
Locations-5-11-2022.jpg?ssl=1 [i0.wp.com]
A 35-page compilation of the reasons provided by 98% of the petition signers is
at: https://ceds.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Reasons-Why-Voters-Want-To-Preserve-the-
Desert-Character-Overlay-District-4-29-2022.pdf [ceds.org]
I am pleased to report to you that the mailing is showing a high degree of deeply felt support for
the Sonoran Preserve among nearby voters, all of which are urging you to maintain the overlay
ordinance.
We would love the opportunity to meet with you again at City Hall to discuss these results and
hopefully work on a solution that your constitutes would find agreeable.
Please reach out to me on how we can schedule a meeting before the June 1st City Council
meeting.
In the meantime, I have listed some helpful links on the survey results below.
Looking forward to speaking with you again soon and thank you for your invested interest in this
development!
-Dr. Gary Kirkilas
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
708-369-4566
Page 1260
Links:
- We mailed the letter at the following link to 3400 registered voters, half of which were
Republican and half Democrat: https://app.box.com/s/3wp1f022c56vu1j566ph0kdcmcbztdh8
[app.box.com].
- The mailing to 3400 voters has thus far generated 1100 signatures of the petition
at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve [surveymonkey.com].
- A map showing the location where supporters live is
at: https://app.box.com/s/t0am8a0717ksk0o1sdalrgdc19zhlcdk [app.box.com]. As you’ll see
support is coming from voters living up to four miles from the Sonoran Preserve. And support is
about equal from Republicans and Democrats.
- Nearly all of the petition signers provided the reasons for why they want the Sonoran Preserve
safeguards of the Desert Character Overlay District retained. These reasons can be viewed
at: https://app.box.com/s/405n9bnddchkl92qj29j1x1m0yx8xhun [app.box.com].
*******
Page 1261
Page 1262
Page 1263
Reasons Provided By Phoenix Residents for Why They Signed
the Save Our Sonoran Preserve Petition at:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
We need to do everything we can to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve. There shouldn’t be lots of homes
there. We’ve already taken so much of the natural habitat and developed it. We need to leave large chunks
alone so that those animals that live in the desert have a place. I love having the wilderness nearby and
untouched. Increasing the number of homes near the preserve is asking for trouble and displacing so many of
the desert animals. I bought out here to be close to nature not to bring the downtown traffic here.
I walk and bike at the preserve at least a couple of times a week. It’s beautiful, and quiet. Driving through to
cave creek rd is actually relaxing, I drive that way when I want to stay away from the crowds on the freeways
(17 & 101). It’s a beautiful drive, it’s what living in Az is about, wide open and beautiful to look at. Don’t ruin it
with more houses and traffic congestion.
As a native Arizonan I am saddened to see so much of the natural beauty of our desert being scourged. Driving
anywhere in the valley and nearby areas you are assaulted by the lack of natural beauty. We need to halt urban
scrawl and save the desert for our grandchildren.
I chose to live in this community because I wanted to be closer to nature and enjoy the desert preserve.
The amount of traffic we already have on dove valley is excessive. We do not need to add more.
I use the Sonoran preserve almost daily to get a brief reprieve from the overcrowding of Phoenix. The ability to
briefly enjoy the desert views without seeing endless developments and choking smog of cars is why we decided
to live in this area.
Too much traffic and too many users making heavy environmental impact. The preserve is there for a reason.
any change to Desert Character Overlay will open the door to the entire area being filled in with high density
housing. Forever destroying the natural landscape of the area. Please vote NO.
Safeguarding the Sonoran Desert Preserve values we treasure
The reason we moved here was the beauty and tranquility of the desert. We were not aware of the proposed
‘city like’ community Verdin wishes to build.
Beautiful desert! Everything doesn’t need to be destroyed and built up
The Arizona desert is a truly beauty that nothing else compares to. Large Cati with blooming flowers, mountain
ranges from every aspect, and wildlife that is crucial for our ecosystem; there’s are just a few reasons that make
Arizona great. WE ARE KILLING OUR SONORAN PRESERVE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION AND HOME
DEVELOPMENTS. We do not want more homes, we want to save our preserve!!!! I want my everyone to be able
to drive down Sonoran desert dr and experience the breathtaking views that I get to see everyday I drive to and
from work. This is truly a special place and we need to keep it that way. Taylor Morrison can go find another
place to destroy if they want to make a quick buck. But I don’t want to see it here
The Sonoran Preserve and the Sonoran Desert Drive represent the last of pristine desert in the city of Phoenix.
Anyone who has visited the Preserve and the Drive will see beautiful views, wildlife, and people using the bike
lanes and hiking trails. To allow a massive development destroy the character overlay will ruin the peaceful
drive and endanger the ecosystem. I also fear that the additional traffic will no doubt create dangerous
conditions for cyclists that regularly train on Sonoran Desert Drive. We live here to appreciate the desert. But
the desert is disappearing in Phoenix. The Sonoran Preserve is a wonderful area of Phoenix and a great place to
escape to from the hustle and bustle of other areas. To grant the rezoning request of a home builder will send
the message that the City of Phoenix cares more about development and not about the constituents who
Need to preserve the Sonoran desert. Too many greedy developers that don’t care since they probably don’t
live here.
Page 1264
The Sonoran preserve is a natural heritage that should not be jeopardized in our beautiful state. Preserving our
natural resources is vital in maintaining our environment as well as maintaining tourism . It is a shame that our
government is allowing this to Happen.
There is already so much danger to bicyclists. Also, just as important, keeping the desert beautiful and allowing
wildlife to thrive in the Sonoran Preserve.
The number of people hiking is increasing but even if is not, the streets are narrow and it is dangerous to drive.
Keep the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve desert beautiful with no construction expansion‐ there’s plenty of
other areas to build houses, etc.
I want to preserve the desert. We have a water shortage not enough water now for the people that live here.
Not enough schools why aren’t the building responsible for building schools for the children?
The unique space is one of the main reasons we built our home in the Gateway region. It has only been open
for a few years and needs to remain a "Preserve" and not stress or encroach on the desert any more than
already has happened.
We have overpopulated the North Phoenix area already with many dense residencies, namely apartment
complexes and townhomes. I believe we need to slow down and consider expansion in a different direction so
that we don't lose many of our beautiful mountain and nature parcels that we need to save. I feel this is being
rushed and has not been thoroughly reviewed and vetted.
This is so important to protect the natural beauty, wildlife, ecosystems, and quiet quality of life that draws
people to the area and the state in general. Please act to prevent the potentially irreparable damage discarding
these safeguards could cause!
Beautiful desert and shouldn’t be changed for housing
Environmental protection of natural areas/habitats, reduce water demand, reduce pollution and traffic
congestion in this area.
We enjoy hiking, biking, and taking beautiful nature photos! Please don’t pollute our beautiful desert with more
needless building!
Enjoying the desert environment is something we need to protect so that we can continue to share it with
Keep some of Phoenix beautiful and preserving the desert beauty. The Phoenix police department can not
handle the calls for service right now how will they handle more traffic.
Traffic and it will ruin the beauty of the area. This is corporate greed
Preserving the preserve ‐ wildlife Traffic and then needed retail to support the development Overdevelopment
of this area
The desert beauty of this area is its most treasured asset
The Desert Character Overlay District was put in place to allow for growth but with measures and safeguards
needed. Ignoring and allowing growth beyond that allowed by the Desert Overlay District in the Sonoran
Preserve area is wrong and will lesson the uniqueness and beauty that we currently have, while also adding
traffic and reducing safety for those that currently enjoy cycling, walking, hiking, etc. along Sonoran and the
preserves. Please do not allow Verdin development to move forward with their plans to exponentially grow this
area and add more homes To the Sonoran Preserve. Thank you.
Please follow the Desert Character Overlay District plan. Keep traffic low and undeveloped land so we can enjoy
the preserve.
Preserving our land for wildlife, beautification and the earth needs to be heard! Enough has been taken over by
businesses and HOA builders. This needs to stop!
The beauty of the desert is disappearing fast! We drive Sonoran desert drive 2‐3 times a week west bound
around sunset. So many people simple stop to take pictures because of the beauty. There is a brief opportunity
to do this because soon houses come into view and obstruct the natural vistas. Home being built today are huge
two story monstrosities, craning this large home together will destroy this beautiful landscape.
Page 1265
I moved here in 2007 to be near this great preserve and to live I. A quiet community. Adding this much housing
developments will forever impact this natural environment
My wife Barbara and I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for nearly nine years. The appeal of this location was and
still is the Sonoran Preserve, a true gift to the residents of Phoenix. Many years ago the overlay district
created a plan for growth balanced with the fragile ecosystem of the preserve. Neglecting this balance
jeopardizes the character which makes this place so special as well as places the preserve at risk. I respectfully
request the Phoenix City Council comply with the overlay and hold Verdin to the established guidelines. After all,
one of the reasons this area appeals to them is they recognize the beauty and appeal of this location to future
as a third generation native zoney, I have seen too much of our beautiful desert turned over to developers. We
must preserve the very asset that draws so many to move to our wonderful state‐ find a better balance
between growth and preservation. I recently moved to a home in Sonoran Foothills to enjoy this beautiful area.
Please do not allow the greed of developers overbuild our desert.
I mountain bike this area at least twice a week and do not want to see the area changed. It is already crowded
on the weekends
When we moved to Arizona nearly 7 years ago, we chose the Sonoran Foothills neighborhood because of the
surroundings. We did not want to live in an overdeveloped area in more developed parts of the valley. We enjoy
our trails and open desert and do not want them further disrupted by overriding existing protections.
Natalie Karis
The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is one of the finest uses of tax payer dollars. The ability to hike and mountain
bike on miles and miles of trails is one of my favorite parts of living in North Phoenix. We are already inundated
with apartment complexes and home developments with plenty of inventory. Plus, there is plenty of land
available for developers to build on that won’t wreck one of the best things that the City of Phoenix has done in
the past couple decades.
Too much housing buildout, need to slow down a little
It is a very peaceful place to hike. My family goes there frequently. The beauty of Sonoran Desert Dr is so
beautiful it should not be disturbed.
I live in the Sonoran desert preserve. Since 2007
Climate change
This area is important to preserve. I regularly use this area for recreation and it is an important reason why I
choose to live in the north valley as opposed to other areas in Phoenix. I DO NOT WANT THE NORTH VALLEY TO
TURN INTO CHANDLER OR GILBERT!!!!
It’s vital to keep the preserve natural and untouched for the use of hiking and supporting outdoor activities.
Without the regulations in place there would be no preserve to use and admire. The animals in the preserve
would be greatly affected by a larger population crowding them.
The amount of traffic increase will greatly harm the ecosystem as well as increased foot traffic in this unique
I've hiked the Apache Trail and adjacent areas through the years while visiting my family in Phoenix. I recently
bought a house in the area and I'm saddened and alarmed that the Phoenix City Council would entertain the
doubling or tripling the number of housing units on the Verdin site. There is a reason why the Desert Character
Overlay District is in existence. I strongly urge the Council to reject the Verdin development company's proposal
to double or triple the number of housing units for the Verdin site.
Destroying desert habitat, overpopulating an area not intended to. Negative effects on property value.
Our desert is beautiful. There won’t be much of it left if it keeps getting built on.
Too many housing developments going up, water, waste and increased traffic issues.
To preserve the beauty and nature of the Sonoran Desert
Page 1266
We are losing our open spaces at a rapid rate all in the name of money. We need to preserve these open spaces
for our future children to enjoy and for the natural animals and plants that were here before us. The increased
traffic and housing will deteriorate the quality of life for all (humans, animals and plants alike). The increased
concrete/pavement will ultimately increase the heat retention which has a detrimental effect on water, wildlife
and plant life. Do not ignore the Desert Character Overlay District.
I drive this road regularly and it’s already getting over populated with traffic with the current development.
More housing and construction will take away the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and will also
increase unwanted traffic.
This would forever destroy the natural landscape and open the door to even more urban sprawl. Please vote NO
No wanting any more home delvelopers tearing up the preserves. With the additional Verizon zone site there
will be to many dangerous EMF’s in the community
There are plenty of other places to build, these this beautiful piece of land beautiful. Keep the traffic down for
those of us who use this area for biking. Oh yes, and where are you getting all the water to support all of this
new construction?!?
I’m concerned that continued development will destroy the beauty of our Sonoran desert. It will bring increased
pollution and traffic to the area.
The reason why I'm signing this petition. We are over developing because we have all these people moving from
other states . We are destroying our beautiful desert to please all these greedy business people to put more
money in their pockets.
I enjoy hiking at various times of the year on the trails in the Sonoran Preserve. I’ve seen an owls nest, lots of
birds, turtles, and cactus of all kinds in all stages of bloom. There is presently no noise pollution and the area is
pristine. I want it to remain as such for future generations to come, not just in my lifetime.
We don't have the infrastructure to support any additional growth. I wish we could halt the issuance of any
further building permits in the state until we can guarantee the people of AZ that we will have adequate water
and energy resources to match projected growth rates. We can NOT have growth outpace supply.
I live directly adjacent to the open desert by the Sonoran Desert Preserve, just off Sonoran Desert Parkway. We
regularly see wildlife, and hear coyotes on a nightly basis. This is a fragile and important ecosystem, and is a
hallmark of the beauty of Arizona’s natural desert landscape. If it disappears, it will destroy this magnificent
aspect of what makes Arizona such a great place to live. For my family, the day the bulldozers show up to tear
down the majestic Saguaro’s to make room for concrete & asphalt, is the day we sell and move away.
I believe honoring the meaning of the preserve is of utmost importance.
1‐ more traffic 2‐displacing wildlife and plants.
Traffic is already overloaded on dove valley road and commitments were made to develop the Sonoran desert
drive. Nothing has happen. Trying to exit my desert enclave neighbor is struggle now, adding more traffic is
negligent. I also moved to the area for the serenity of the preserves and natural habits, all developers in the
area must comply with the desert character overlay.
This area is greatly used for hiking, biking, trail running, and outdoor recreational activities. We do not want
over development to ruin the natural aesthetics, significantly increase noise, or pollution that would degrade
the value of the true remaining wilderness in the Sonoran Desert Preserve. Please seek to enforce and uphold
the Desert Character Overlay District toward the Verdin project and other subsequent proposals.
Our schools are already over capacity and adding yet another high density housing development will adversely
impact the school infrastructure as well as the safety to bikers in Sonoran Boulevard/Dove Valley. Allowing
larger lots and this home sizes will attract more affluent residents and this increase the tax revenues for this
I oppose the Verdin site changing the current Desert Character Overlay District plan. We are already seeing
traffic that is dangerous to our cyclists and pedestrians. Adding additional homes without concern for the traffic
it will bring will greatly make this road even more dangerous.
Page 1267
Preserving the natural beauty of the area is important to current residents. They use this area for healthy
recreation. It also should be saved fir environmental reasons. Don’t add to the sprawl that is already part of
may areas in Phoenix .
We live in a largely unspoiled Area of the city. We chose this location for its natural beauty and remoteness
from the busy‐ness of the city. We enjoy the outdoor activities it has to offer without the noise and pollution we
see elsewhere. Please help preserve this area for future generations to enjoy.
Currently traffic on Dove Valley / Sonoran Desert Drive is heavy during busy hours. With the addition of Verdin
adding 1200 homes could increase traffic by 3 times and with 2 new housing developments currently being built
west of us and the new semiconductor plant being built could increase traffic by 6 times as where it is today.
Plus taking over more of the desert landscape that was originally approved is just being greedy. I am all for
progress and increasing tax base but there must be limits to preserve the beauty of our area.
With all the planned development in the area, I have a major concern about the infrastructure, and even
planned expansion, being able to support the additional housing in the preserve. Part of the appeal of our area
is the desert beauty, so additionally, overturning district safeguards not only damages the natural environment,
but risks all those that already live/work in this community.
The preserve is a sanctuary and feel that this increased volume of homes would create a dangerous high traffic
in an area that is a recreational haven for cyclist, hikers and runners. The impact of these homes will also have a
negative affect on the the wildlife and natural dessert of the area.
My family and I use these trials for recreation purposes. We are also concerned as a community for the traffic as
well as how it will effect the wildlife.
As the builders destroy the land for more houses the animal life get pushed away and in to smaller areas of
open land. Or get caught in or on people's property. Unacceptable to just ignore the standards for there
It’s a gorgeous area that exemplifies the desert…and it’s close to the valley. Developing this area is a sad
mistake that we should learn that open spaces need preserved
Maintain desert preserve, congestion, quality of life, safer place to enjoy desert with exercise.
With the amount of traffic on Sonoran/Dove Valley today, when we pull out of Sonoran Gate Community, it is
taking a chance on your life when needing to turn left. Why would anyone approve more home building to get
more traffic? Also cars ‐ and trucks ‐ are speeding between 55‐70 miles an hour on this stretch. You should
have traffic lights at all intersections for turning traffic. Also, Let's Save Our Desert Views ‐ that's why we built a
We are overbuilding this area. Traffic, water supply, pollution are all contributing factors to limit growth. In
addition, the limited wildlife will be severely impacted
Sonoran desert is such a beautiful drive. Everyone should be able to experience it. Sonoran desert drive is not
meant for a high volumes of traffic and our beautiful Sonoran desert would be ruined with the addition of
housing developments along Sonoran Desert Drive.
We moved here for the a handful of reasons, one of them was the beauty of the state. But that seems to keep
getting chipped away, literally.
It is important to preserve the natural desert landscape and prevent overbuild that will destroy habitats.
Adding additional homes when there is no road infrastructure will add so much traffic. I drive SDD and there are
times when there are more than 25 cars backed up at the intersection of Cave Creek Rd. Also I am concerned
about closing up the wash between SDD because animals need to be able to traverse the entire wash. I am not
against the original number of homes but to increase it to what TM is asking is a lot more homes. The Sonoran
Preserve is very beautiful and I enjoy biking there but it is hard to cross the street with the current amount of
traffic on Dove Valley Rd and the Verdin Project will triple the amount of traffic.
Enjoy bicycling through the preserve. The road is too narrow for the traffic already using the parkway.
I live here and traffic is already getting too much! We moved here 10 years ago to be out in the desert!!! I hike
on the trails at least twice a week! Please keep more desert!
Page 1268
The beauty and quiet of the desert and the Mountain views are priceless. This is why I live in Arizona. The clean
air and the wild life are amazing. The wilderness of the preserve needs to be maintained.
The Sonoran Preserve is absolutely beautiful and filled with flora and fauna unique to the area. Sonoran
Preserve should remain natural for the benefit of the critters who live there.
Beautiful desert scenery and nearby desert recreation like hiking and biking.
It is vitally important that the Sonoran desert preserve is kept safe from over population of the surrounding
areas! The overbuilding of the area will degrade the beautiful that we and future generations need in our lives
to create the balance of city living. It’s critical! Over building followed by extremely high traffic increases will
destroy the preservation of it’s natural beauty. I ask that the members of the Phoenix City Counsel hear our
concerns and uphold the Desert Character Overlay District as it was intended.
The beauty of the desert & also a place for the animals to live. We gave already taken enough of their home.
We need to protect our beautiful desert. There are many other areas to build on so we can all appreciate the
scenery. After all this is why we live here.
Use that area to bike the trails. Want to keep the space natural beauty not filled with homes.
Traffic congestion, pedestrian and bicycle safety. Preserving this area from development, as envisioned by the
Desert Character Overlay District.
The beauty of this Preserve area should be PRESERVED. There is a reason why the DCOD exists.
As a 4th generation native Arizonan, I adore our beautiful desserts and believe we must take great care in
unbridled expansion of urban growth. This project would place a huge strain on the perserve area, parkway,
noise, and environmental elements.
Without a road plan for major increase in traffic and the current drought in AZ, I oppose developments like
Not only do I enjoy the scenic view along Sonoran Desert Drive, but I strongly believe our future to continue to
live in Phoenix depends on limiting new developments the number one reason being our limited water supply.
We are already in water crisis. How can we continue to develop and build and be able to meet our water needs.
This is scary for already established residents. How will my home value be impacted if there is no water? My
second concern for this development is how it will impact my home value. With increase in traffic, and
development of additional major roads right by my house obstructing views and increasing noise levels, my
home value will most likely be negatively impacted. My house backs up to the beautiful desert and as homes
continue to be built in the desert, our view continues to diminish. Lastly, so many animals that live in the
Sonoran desert will be displaced. With so many developments currently taking place in this area, the animals
have no where to go. We are destroying our habitats, which will further contribute to climate change,
continuing droughts, increasing fires making this location less desirable to live.
Natural beauty along with reduced noise, traffic and night lights.
Love the beauty of the area. So peaceful to drive along and see the plants and trees, which would be lost
forever with more housing. Please save this beautiful area for our children and all those who come after them.
I am signing this petition as I care deeply about keeping the Sonoran preserve sacred. It is important to preserve
the existing ecosystems. Additionally, This area is already dangerous with increasing traffic.
The Sonoran Desert is home to many species. It's important for their survival that their habitat isn't cut up by
roads and other development.
I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for 15 years. I do not want to see my beautiful natural desert destroyed. I like
living in a quiet and not so busy area of town. I would be devastated if Sonoran desert drive turns into another
freeway right next to my house. I specifically moved in this area to get away from the noise and traffic. The
natural wildlife here will also be destroyed which part of the character of this area.
Preserve recreation area that is part of and enjoyed by our community. Prevent gross over development which
will destroy the desert community which we call home
Would love to keep this scenic drive the way it is. Scenic.
We value the beauty of the preserve and feel strongly it should be maintained.
Page 1269
I have been hiking at the Sonoran Preserve for years with my son and my dogs. We love the beauty and the
feeling of being in the wilderness just a couple of miles from our house in Valley Vista. I know our area is
experiencing tremendous growth right now but I feel the area on the preserve needs to continue to be
My family and I enjoy this land and don’t want to see this over crowded We use this nature and Beautiful
preserve in north Phoenix area.
It’s critically important to protect the preserve and maintain the natural beauty of the area. This is why so many
of us moved here. It’s already not safe to leave the neighborhood with people speeding and limited visibility of
the rolling road. Added traffic would make routine activities no longer enjoyable.
Great hiking and exploring area.
The Sonoran Preserve is a promise to keep our beautiful desert pristine. Encroachment of more homes breaks
that promise. The delicate balance of between humans and wildlife is already teetering in the wrong direction.
Let’s save some beauty for future generations.
I support maintaining the desert overlay requirements for the Sonoran preserve. We need to maintain a healthy
balance between nature and development and not allow these safeguards to be discarded for development of
any current or future projects.
We moved up to the area because there was space and open land. We don’t want to live where people are on
top of each other and traffic is out of hand. Don’t ruin our beautiful space.
There are so many communities being built simply for the benefit and profit of the builders that little attention
is given to the people who actually want to have both, a beautiful home in a beautiful well thought out
community where the desert we live in is represented and not just the interest of the builders bottom line. Do
the right thing for a change.
I hike and bike in the preserve and love listening and seeing all the blooms, wild animals and quietness the
desert has to offer. Please quit the over building that is going on! Preserve our water resources!!
Preserve the desert hiking areas.
I live near this area and use it all of the time. Love it! The area is getting congested already and it’s starting to
ruin this special area/space we have available to us to enjoy nature.
I want to preserve our current area and I bike 6 days a week in what I already consider dangerous traffic to get
to the preserve and ride the path!
What comes after houses? Walmart, McDonald's, Circle K. Build on the west side of I‐17!
I participate in running and hiking in the area and treasure the natural beauty of the desert landscape.
The Desert Character Overlay was put in place to preserve open spaces and promote responsible development.
Develeopers should not be allowed to bypass rules and guidelines. Please maintain the integrity of Overlay
safeguards for the sake of the future of our community.
We need to protect these lands and stop paving over the natural beauty of this Preserve. There is a reason it is
called a Preserve. Let’s preserve it and the abundant plants and wildlife that call it home!
The speed at which the traffic flows is about 20 over the speed limit and it is a matter of time before a biker is
killed. This is happening currently and with more traffic /homes it will be worse. We don’t have the school
space to support more homes. We moved up north to get away from traffic and now the desert is at risk of
being destroyed by more builds.
I hike thru the preserve almost everyday. It is a beautiful and peaceful area amid the city. Losing this area to
Korea housing would be awful. There is so much development everywhere so these special areas are becoming
all the more important to spare or not over develop. Once it is gone it can not be replaced. Please don't let this
wonderful area be ruined by more over development!
We bought a home in this area in 2009 with the idea that the Sonoran Preserve would remain a Preserve. We
and many of our neighbors enjoy using the walking, hiking and biking trails because of its serenity. Please don't
let the lure of developers'money start chipping away at it. The city invested a lot to create the trails and the
Apache Wash trailhead. Let's preserve the Preserve.
Page 1270
We do not want this new development because we love the natural desert we chose to live near. In addition,
we do need the excessive amount of traffic that such a development would cause.
I live in the area. I don’t want to see any further development in the Sonoran desert preserve area. I ride my
bike through there and drive through there frequently. I have already noticed how dangerous it is for bicyclist
and that road is becoming extremely congested. Adding a new development will only make matters worse.
I’d be like to see less traffic and houses. This a beautiful area, and treasure our Sonoran preserve.
There is no landscape in the United States like our beautiful Arizona deserts. It is critical that they be protected
as well as the wildlife in them!
Want beauty while biking
Myself and so many of my neighbors and friends hike this area on a regular basis! There is a nest that an owl
comes back to every year! There are beautiful fees of the amazing area in which so many of us call home! Please
don’t destroy an area we love and cherish
One of the main reasons we bought our house here in 2018 was because of it’s location in relation to the
Preserve. Already traffic has become a nightmare with the recent developments and removing the Preserve will
only exacerbate an already horrible problem. Also, to quote the great Joanie Mitchell, “you don’t know what
you’ve got til it’s gone.” Losing the Preserve would cause irreparable damage to the environment and the
The Sonoran Preserve along Sonoran Desert Drive allows us close appreciation of the scenic desert and its
thriving ecosystem. Other parts of the valley are better equipped for growth and infill. We need to embrace
density where the city is more prepared to support it. This patchwork sprawl into the outer reaches of the
desert chops up the expanse of habitat unnecessarily. If it continues, we can only look forward to small patches
of desert brush between homes as opposed to miles of our unique desert that we can all enjoy.
Preserve the natural beauty of the AZ desert.
It's a beautiful, natural preserve. It's a generous drive and the hiking and biking trails amid the serene desert are
therapeutic.
The Desert Character Overlay District should be adhered to.
I want to keep the area accessable for recreation.
It is a beautiful drive and I am sad to see they have done any development along this stretch of road. I thought
this was a preserve but it doesn't seem like it lately with all of the signs I have seen go up lately.
After retirement, I moved here from the city specifically to enjoy the Sonora Preserve. To lose the beauty of
The Preserve would be nothing short Of a crime.
I live around the corner in Sonoran Foothills community and one of the reasons we moved here was to be able
to bike on Dove Valley and Sonoran Desert, as we train for Triathlons year round. Every car you add to these
roads makes this more dangerous for us. I have almost been hit twice by cars coming out of Sonoran Gate
community. The proposed development of over 1400 homes will destroy this very special area.
As a resident living at Fireside, I have seen javelinas (up to a dozen at a time) and other wild animals come up to
our home looking for food and emptying garbage at night. By tearing down more natural and wild habitat for
additional homes will only increase the existing problems for the animals in the dessert when more of their
natural habitat is torn down. Stop tearing in to the natural surrounding preserve.
The beauty of the Sonoran Preserve will be replaced with urban area???? During the hike or bike ride are we
supposed to admire the houses???
This area was set aside to preserve nature and all her beauty. yes the land is very valuable but so is central park
in New York. Preserve means exactly that PRESERVE
I live in Sonoran Gate. I hike Apache Trail.
For the animals. We can’t continue to build on their land. They are constantly being pushed out. This earth
cannot sustain all the building
Page 1271
There is no need for additional housing in our area specifically so near a protected preserve. There is not enough
water so support the additional homes and businesses that come with a development such as this.
Jennifer Walter
The Desert Charter Overlay District is in place to protect the Preserve. We are simply asking to maintain
adherence to it. Other than profit, there is no valid reason to break the Charter. If housing shortage is an
argument, then investors should absolutely look to revitalize and invest in existing residential spaces.
We moved to this area to enjoy the beautiful desert landscape that it offers unlike many other Phoenix areas.
To destroy this beauty that offers hiking, biking, and general nature opportunities so close to home would be
devastating for my family, not to mention the traffic that it would bring. Our neighborhood is already being
robbed of its quiet and peace from the houses already built on this road and it’s use as a through street. People
speed through at 50+ miles per hour to the point that it is difficult for me to turn left out of my gate. I can’t
imagine the impact on this traffic should more homes be allowed through the preserve. Let’s keep this beauty
to enjoy. Things like this are disappearing from the Phoenix area. We must save this.
This preserve is important for the community and wildlife!
There are plenty of areas to do future developments we shouldn’t marginalize the beauty of the Sonoran
Sonora Desert Drive is a highlight of living in the area, and provides a safe place to walk and bike near the
preserve. For those of us who live along the road, this is a matter of peace and safety, but for our wildlife, this is
a matter of survival. Allowing the Verdin development company to increase the number of planned housing
units would increase noise and traffic, endangering cyclists in the bicycle lane and make it unnecessarily
dangerous for the wildlife of the Sonoran Desert Preserve to cross the road.
My concern is for public safety first and foremost. In addition to the widening of the Sonoran roadway and the
disregard for the serenity of the desert. Finally I feel the City is growing too fast with little regard for Public
Safety and infrastructure growth.
I frequently recreate in the area ‐ it is frequented by a lot of people. Both on the road with limited traffic and on
the trails. It would be detrimental to the foundation of the Phoenix Preserves to take away land dedicated to
open space and letting developers tear it apart. Developers can get land further out on the outskirts of town to
develop ‐ not areas already dedicated as open space for all to recreate now and future generations.
We live in the Sonoran Gate community. I’m also a cyclist. We moved here to escape congestion and enjoy the
outdoors. All of that is threatened with this current building frenzy. Why would we abandon the express
purpose of these Preserves, so carefully planned and uniquely executed?! And where are we finding a
sustainable water supply for this unbridled development? This is madness.
I live in the vicinity of the preserve. I moved here to be close to nature and removed from the hustle of town. I
have enjoyed having wild animals pass through my backyard, but since all of the building along Sonoran Desert
Drive/Dove Valley began, wildlife sightings near my home have decreased dramatically. We are edging the
native species out of their rightful territory. Please do not butcher the desert any further.
We need to preserve the open spaces that attract so many to the area for recreation. There is a lot of building
of high occupancy units and housing underway. Schools are already at capacity, new services are being built on
Jomax to ease the influx, road infrastructure needs to be in consideration to.
It is very important to retain our natural desert and the Sonoran Preserve.
There would be too much traffic and it will ruin the beauty of this area of the desert. There are enough
developments in the area and we need to keep these areas open.
There are many other places to develop. None of those areas are as “Arizona Natural” as the Sonoran Desert
area. Preserve this area for people to enjoy not trash with developments.
There is enough congestion and traffic as it is. Not to mention, our beautiful desert is continually being built in.
Page 1272
This beautiful desert area needs to maintain its character and uniqueness. It’s the reason why many people live
in the area. Stop!!
The main reason we bought our home in this location was because of how beautiful the desert is and very
peaceful. Almost feels like we're out of town in our very own neighborhood. Also, there is already an
infrastructure challenge with the lack of grocery stores, restaurants, gas stations etc. Adding 1200 more homes
would have a major impact on everything around us and create serious traffic issues to go anywhere, even on
We are in a huge water shortage all over the country and building in our preserves just takes more resources
that we all need to survive!
Standards are acceptable as they are set. I have many safety concerns through that Corridor. This is purely profit
over planned and locals paying the price.
Deserts are fragile environments/ecosystems and overcrowded land use will create problems that will take
generations to correct. Native species need to have their environment protected.
Councilman Waring, please continue to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
So many animals will get displaced from there natural habitats.
There are limited resources that we can all share and enjoy. The Desert Character Overlay District was
established to allow for growth but also to protect our wonderful desert. We are responsible for the
stewardship of this desert for future generations.
We moved here 3 years ago. We knew we wanted this home when we were driving around the home and drove
down sonoran desert drive. We loved that the desert was so close to us, that we were going to live to close to a
preserve that our kids could learn about the Arizona and the desert right out their back door.
I live right next to it and want to see it preserved.
Traffic is already too heavy and congested. Our streets are becoming dangerous.
We need to start limiting the amount of residential builds in the Sonoran Preserve area before this majestic
natural place is no more. Preserve the habitat and recreational area this land offers local residents and tourists.
The area is already congested and poses safety concerns for bicyclists, hikers and drivers due to the increased
motor traffic activity. Adding more congestion would further escalate the risk and concern associated.
It's a Beautiful area for our community. Hiding companies should stay within how the area is zoned
It's going to change the complete landscape of our community. I do not want an excessive amount of traffic.
I live in Sonoran Gate. Moved here to be by my sons. One lives in Sonoran Gate also (6 houses away). We
moved here for the beauty and serenity of the desert preserve. Our hope was to continue to grow our family
and ensure our next generation will also have the opportunity to enjoy the beauty of this area. Hot air Balloons
and bike riders every morning. It’s a place of beauty, calmness and peace. Please do not destroy this gift. Thank
I bought 20 years in area specifically for the landscape and to be outside the city. We have so many accidents
and fatalities due the EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC. We can’t handle the i flux of cars students business. Phoenix not
supporting all the builds! What makes this area so desired is the preserve!!!
Once the natural land is gone we loose the gorgeous desert that many people move here for. Pollution has
gotten much worse in the past few years. More home mean more traffic and even worse pollution. The water
table is getting lower and more homes mean more water usage. We don’t have water for them!
No more building and take away from our desert landscape. Stop already.
I live near this area and enjoy hiking the mountain preserve. I also enjoy diving through Sonoran dessert drive
to see the beautiful landscape our state has to offer without having to drive so far away. Please don’t take this
We have lived in Sonoran foothills for 13 years. We have always loved how quiet it is up here and love the
beauty of the desert. Please do not build more homes and ruin all the great things we have up here!
To keep the nature as treasure and beautiful view
We love the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please protect what is left and save the beauty of the dessert.
Page 1273
While the continued expansion of homes and building into this area is inevitable and needed, the maintenance
of the Desert Character Overlay is important to keep the beauty and feel of this area. The residents who live
here moved here for a reason, and we appreciate the forethought that went into the Desert Character Overlay
originally. Please do not abandon this. It would be one thing if the builder were building reasonably priced
homes to assist with the affordable housing shortage, but they are not. This request is purely for the financial
advantage of the builder and the detriment of our community.
We moved to this area because of the preserve, and while we support growth, the aspects of the preserve that
can be protected, should be. It is our responsibility to growth responsively!
Desert overlay is in place to protect the area from over development. We use the preserve multiple times a
week as a family and more cars and will make it ever more difficult to access the amenities from our
We selected this area to live, in part, based on the feeling of being closer to nature. The Sonoran Preserve
played a big part in that feeling. The loss of any Preserve open space or the increase in traffic thru the Preserve
will diminish that feeling. Please require all developers to comply with existing develop restrictions and do not
"lessen" those restrictions. ‐ Thank you...
It is a spectacular preserve and should kept that way. This area can’t handle the traffic now let alone of more
developments are added.
Living by the beautiful Sonoran Mountain Preserve area and Sonoran Desert Drive, allows people to interact
positively with nature and the environment. This is necessary for people’s physical and mental well being,
which we all rediscovered during the pandemic when it was one of the few things people were allowed to do.
The Mountain Preserve allows people to connect with nature and enjoy the peaceful outdoor environment. The
people in the area love the open spaces and serenity that the Sonoran Desert Mountan Preserve provides. They
walk, bike or hike in the neighborhood everyday. If these developers are allowed to over develop this beautiful
area it will be a detriment to the already established neighborhoods by increased population through clustered
housing, traffic, safety, noise levels, over crowded schools, and a host of other issues. This mountain preserve is
vital to the well being and safety of people who chose to live for here for a better quality of life. Please don’t
allow these developers to destroy the Mountain Preserve. Thank you
I live in this area, I use the hiking trails and bike paths along Sonoran drive on a weekly basis, I love looking out
into the Desert everytime and taking in its natural beauty it has to offer, Roof tops would hinder this…. If the
county/city ever needs additional funding they can have Police officers patrol Sonoran Desert drive and would
run out of paper giving traffic tickets, its already a race track with the driving practices on this road,,,,, more
congestion will make it worst and a lot more dangerous than itvis now, I quit riding my bike in the bike lane on
that road, I ride on the bike path to the north of the road for that reason…
Like to go hiking there and see the natural views.
With all the apartments being built on the west end between Dove Valley & Sonoran Desert Drive, the traffic
will become just like the city streets—noisy and congested. Verdin proposing additional homes will make it that
much worse. In addition, we moved to this area because of the Sonoron Desert Preserve which is becoming non
We moved here to be next to open desert and away from valley traffic. Increasing to the proposed
developmentm will eliminate both of these coveted features!
The Sonoran Preserve was one of the most important reasons we purchased a house in this area. To continually
chip away at this wonderful area would be so detrimental to the wildlife that live there as well as the wonderful
hiking trails that allow people to get out and experience nature at its finest. I am strongly against ruining
anymore of the Preserve.
I want to protect the wilderness and essence of the preserve. I thought this land was protected from future
housing development
Please do not increase the level of traffic on sonoran desert parkway. The additional cars will increase risk to
current commuters and cyclists.
To adhere to our natural landscape and preserve the area and its wildlife.
Page 1274
Bike safety Road overly congested
One of the reasons I moved to this area was because of the Preserve and being told it would not be developed.
How incredibly sad we're even needing to have this discussion. Please do the right thing and save the Sonoran
Why destroy a beautiful, well loved, piece of land when we already have too many houses.
I have many reasons for you to consider preserving the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive. Homes and
traffic directly impact the fragile desert. Urban heat, pollution, and human destruction directly destroy the
desert plants. The Sonoran Preserve was set aside for the specific reason of preserving an area for people to
enjoy the beauty of the desert. Adding homes along the Sonoran Preserve and Sonoran Desert Drive will
increase traffic. Solutions to traffic congestion is to add and or expand lanes which will take up desert land.
Lastly and more importantly, Arizona is in a major drought. More homes means less water. There are plenty of
homes and apartments being built in Phoenix without taking from the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert
Two reasons: to preserve the beauty of the preserve and the hone of the animals living there. Second, is the
traffic. We are already experiencing new heavy traffic with our growth up here and adding this will increase it
greatly. I moved up this way because of the lifestyle it afforded without so much traffic. Along with the traffic
comes more accidents, which we are already experiencing, more congestion, etc.
This is a designated Desert Sonoran Preserve. The established trails are used by thousands and the preserve
hosts habitat for Arizona wildlife including javelina, bobcat, coyote, raccoon, ground squirrel and many more.
There are a variety of bird and reptile species Gila Monster, great horned owl, roadrunner, gambles quail, Inca
dove, Cardinals, spotted whip tail and chuckwalla lizards to mention a few. This area of Phoenix cannot be
expanded into a legislated preserve. Too many apartments in the area has already increased crime, drugs and
traffic congestion. Any additional housing and apartment development requests in the north Phoenix area must
be denied. Respectfully, Bill Shackelford. Voting Resident
Concerned about excessive housing & associated traffic density causing problems & congestion. Please do not
override Desert character Overlay District guidelines
I have lived in this area for over 16 years and am a native Arizonan. The City has done a wonderful job on
Sonoran Desert Drive, in terms of incorporating areas to recreate and enjoy the unbelievable desert scenery
within the Sonoran Preserve. I have hiked the area and marvel at the beauty. Increasing the planned housing
units by multiples of two or three will significantly detract from the area's beauty and tranquility and add an
unsustainable amount of traffic and introduce ecological damage to the area. There is a reason so much land
was designated as a preserve all those years ago. It should stay that way.
I purchased my house on the southern boundary of Sonoran Gate with the intent of enjoying the serenity of the
desert in my backyard. This expansion will teplace my view with a 6 lane high traffic road. The Scenic Dove
Valley road will also become increasingly busy affecting outdoor activities such as biking.
Please preserve the beautiful desert.
We moved from the city specifically to enjoy the natural preserve and wildlife of this area. Also, we were
assured no building would take place along the Sonoran Preserve corridor. Our family loves to bike ride in the
peaceful desert preserve and request that it remains a preserve for our wildlife and for all to enjoy in it’s natural
To preserve the natural desert. Traffic is already excessive. This area is amazing for bike rides, hiking & exercise.
Let’s keep it that way.
Arizona is destroying so much of the natural land that people moved here for. I don’t want more traffic. It’s
awful as it is. Water is at emergency levels and more homes will only tax the water levels more.
Ruin of preserve / increased traffic volume
We live in the area, have hiked these trails, our two boys attended nearby CCUSD Horseshoe Trails elementary
school, and I’d say that in general we have a strong desire to act as good stewards of this land and therefore
have a vested interest in maintaining the beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and our balance with nature.
We need to preserve our natural habitat.Increased construction around the area already put too much load on
traffic and school system.We have no new building of schools and we are worried where all these will get
Page 1275
The beauty and sanctity of Sonoran preserve and the surrounding area is vital to our wildlife and maintaining
there habitats is crucial to these animals that are being continually uprooted by builders and developers greed.
Traffic is already increasing on Sonoran dessert drive and frankly adding more homes will make it more
dangerous for people trying to enjoy the beauty nature is already providing us. We cannot keep destroying
Arizona’s natural beauty just to pad the pockets of a few and bring in more people to an already overpopulated
area, where policing these areas is challenging already for our stretched to the limit police force. Stop building
and start enjoying the beauty that our Sonoran preserve is providing us.
Too much growth and congestion. Lack of conservation to desert land and outdoor activities.
Overdeveloping is irresponsible when there’s no plan for increased traffic and water supply!
Keep our desert traffic and congestion to a minimum; we still enjoy a lot of wildlife.
We need less development and more room to safely enjoy nature with trails and outdoor activities. Dove Valley
Rd is already a speed zone and super trafficked, more development is a detriment to our beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. Please reject this proposal.
The scenery is beautiful along Sonoran Desert Drive and to see sections of it being developed for housing
projects will take away from the beauty that we have all come to love about this area.
The extra traffic flow will affect all the wild life amongst many other reasons.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve is so beautiful and serves MANY purposes. That's why we moved here, and we
don't want to lose it ! We MUST keep development at a reasonable amount.
We moved up here to be away from the crowds and we love the desert landscape And the air quality is better
for our son who has asthma
This project has the ability to set precedence for any other development. The fact the developer is asking to
refine for more houses and remove the desert overlay is a slippery slope to having high density homes stacked
on what is one of the mist beautiful areas of desert. It is too dense, goes against city plans meant to protect the
desert character of north Phoenix and will bring an influx of traffic to the area. Please look at giving up some
land somewhere else that is not across from a beautiful nature preserve.
My family and I are avid cyclists, and for the past five years we have seen an increase of cars and speed. I myself
had a couple of car and motorcycle incidents due to the amount of traffic and their speed. I’m worried that with
the increase of housing it’s only going to make our rides more dangerous, as drivers don’t respect speed limits.
Please keep the overlay as it was intended. Don’t put money over our safety. Thank you
I want it to remain natural. Don’t want more noise, development coming to the area.
We do not want the sonoran preserve to be destroyed just to build some additional homes. The traffic is already
a major problem and there is not enough infrastructure and businesses around here to support all these homes.
To much growth for what this area was set up to be.
I moved to this area because I love the open spaces.
I am for protecting as much land as possible and conserving water.
It’s a beautiful area to walk or hike or bike and it’s the last area I know of that is close to me. Otherwise I’d have
to drive over 40 minutes to find a preserve that is wild and natural
The Sonoran Preserve needs to be saved, it provides recreation like walking, hiking and biking. Also, it keeps the
heat down. Adding more homes will only create more traffic. One of the reasons we moved to this area is due
to this Sonoran Preserve.
The traffic currently traveling on Sonora Desert Dr is already at a dangerous amount. Not specifically due to
frequency or number of users, but due primarily to their speed on the roadway. The current speed limit is
45mph, but traffic regularly travels in excess of 60mph. This in combination with the vulnerable users of the
road and the addition of a significant amount of vehicles is a disaster in the making for the roadway as it is now.
Traffic concerns and safety for cyclists along SDD.
Page 1276
I love the desert landscape, and enjoy hiking on my time off work. I see the amount of buildings that are being
constructed and the traffic it is creating. Please do not destroy the little bit of desert that exists in this large city,
the habitat of our beloved desert animals.
I am a third generation Phoenician and have lived in North Phoenix most of my life. I have watched the growth
of the valley over the years and am not opposed to progress but it needs to be done thoughtfully and
responsibly. This proposal to increase the number of homes along the Sonoran Desert drive is reckless and
irresponsible. The developers of the Verdin project are not thinking about the residents of the area or the future
generations that will use the preserve but are rather motivated by the lure of maximizing their profits. I am
strongly opposed to discarding the charter and hope that as our representatives you will do the right thing for
the citizens of this area. Seriously take into consideration what’s best for not only the residents but also the
wildlife and the desert itself. This decision will not only impact our quality of life but the quality of life for those
that will come long after we’re gone. A sea of homes and pushing more and more people into an untouched
area of desert is not good for the future of our community.
We moved here from Chicago to near a more spacious beautiful desert area. We've watched the traffic increase
three fold which takes away from safety and the beauty of the land. We moved her to be near the natural
preserves, hike, bike and enjoy nature. In the almost 6 years we've been here we rarely see the wild life we've
come to love no longer around. Traffic on North Valley is dangerous at times.
Beautiful drive and prime hiking area
The Sonoran Preserve was the deciding factor for my wife and I to move to this area. We had hoped that
Preserve would stay as it is a Natural desert landscape that was protected for all to enjoy. We enjoy the
numerous hiking trails, walking areas that are safe and the pavilions that we use to gather with friends . We
knew that there would be issues when we seen new developments popping up and took away the Natural
surroundings. This has to stop . Did I mention the wildlife that we all see and enjoy? These developments are all
about one thing ‐ greed. Please let this continue to be the Sonoran Preserve!
Wide open space without traffic & housing congestion, w/o water & schooling requirements is vital to this area
of the Sonoran Preserve.
Additional development will ruin the Sonoran Reserve’s pristine nature. Please preserve this vital area for our
Desert’s wildlife for generations to come to enjoy .
The Donoran a preserve is a peaceful area used by many people for hiking, mountain biking and horseback
riding. Adding more houses will increase the number of people using the trails as well as create more traffic in
I do not wish to see this beautiful desert landscape overcome with more traffic and houses.
I’m concerned about all the animals in the area. As well as if you continue to build what about the schools and
the traffic. It no longer will be a peaceful environment. And the more expensive homes you build people really
can’t afford them but end up in bankruptcy and then they’ll be empty
I ride my bike religiously on Sonoran Drive and bike safety for our cyclist should be a main concern and priority.
I am very concerned about the additional traffic volume that will be a result of large Verdin community. I am a
triathlete who uses Sonoran Desert Dr. daily for training and with the increased traffic I fear for my safety. In
addition, we moved to this area (85085) for the beauty of the desert. Abandoning the Desert Character Overlay
District will eliminate the protections that were placed to ensure conservation of the ecosystems in the area
while still allowing for some development. The large number of homes the Verdin development company
proposes to squeeze into this area will detract from the wilderness and beauty of the Preserve. Yet, another
area of concern would be the overcrowding of schools in the Deer Valley School district.
Page 1277
The desert in the Sonoran Desert Preserve is already quite overused by hikers, bikers and equestrian riders. By
increasing the population adjacent to this preserve, not only will it lose its true wilderness experience, but it will
have increased urban pressures placed upon it, threatening its very existence. Additionally, as I live just meters
from Dove Valley Trail and witness the already heavy traffic along this corridor that connects to Sonoran Desert
Drive, any increased volumes in traffic would effectively make it very difficult to exit my community onto Dove
Valley Road where no traffic lights exist.
Area should remain as it is. Area is also over populated with new homes and congestion with traffic.
Sonoran Desert Drive & surrounding preserve area can not accommodate traffic volume due to proposed Verdin
development.
Ignoring the desert character overlay district would be a HUGE mistake. Overdevelopment will ruin the desert
and will change the habitat in and around that area and big developers don’t care about that so it’s our job to
care for them.
Traffic is already becoming very busy along Sonoran Desert Drive. Many large trucks are using this now too. We
were told this area was supposed to preserve the Sonoran Desert. Many people use the bike paths and hiking
paths. I feel it would become more dangerous to use these paths with the increase of doubling or tripling traffic
with the increased number of homes they are asking for. Keep the same number of homes it was originally
I am a city of Phoenix park steward for the far north valley preserves including Apache Wash and Dixie
Mountain. I patrol these trails for hiker safety several times of month. The beauty and open desert landscape of
the Sonoran area is a prime reason why people move to this area or visit it to hike or bike. Please do not add
higher density housing and destroy the open land we currently enjoy.
The growth in this area is already at an all time high. This small area of desert PRESERVE is why many of us
moved to the area. The PRESERVE is used by hikers and bikers as a beautiful getaway that is in our backyard.
Every other inch has already been developed by apartment complexes. Enough!! Leave our PRESERVE alone!!
I do not want the desert destroyed any more than it already has been, it needs to be preserved. I hike daily
along the trails from Apache Wash to Paloma Pkwy, the scenic views are being compromised by building, the
noise of the traffic is ruining the peace of the outside and nearing running me off the road as I try to cross to the
trails. It's insane the number of cars already and Copperleaf development isn't even populated yet. No more
homes to destroy the serenity and beauty of this area.
I prefer an environment that is a balance between housing and open land
This drive is very vital for bikers and the natural trails and parks the residents across the city come to enjoy. The
new development across the dedicated Sonoran landscape is going to spoil everything and increase the safety
concerns on the biking corridor. This corridor is used by Olympic gold medal winners , Tour de France
Maintain the natural open space in this areas Traffic congestion issues
The Desert Character is an important part of Phoenix that needs to be kept preserved and available for all
Phoenicians and other AZ residents to enjoy the natural scene this Sonoran Desert can provide outside of the
busy metropolis of the Phoenix metroplex and other surrounding cities.
Need to preserve as much of our beautiful mountains as possible
Wildlife protection and natural beauty
Our desert is part of our lifestyle's. Many of us hike and enjoy our desert landscape. The area is not built for
even 400+ homes, with an average of 2 vehicles per home. Our local school system doesn’t support the vast
amount of new developments going up currently. It’s will also decrease night visibility of the sky in the evening
for those who use telescopes. It will also increase area emissions, pollution visibility, and area temperature.
People need places to live but so do animals. The Southwest has beautiful deserts and what makes this place
I moved up in this area to get away from the city, crowds and traffic, enjoy the outdoors to hike and cycle.
We need to keep as much of the natural habitat in this area as possible for the enjoyment of all residents and
Page 1278
Too much traffic already
My family and I love hiking in the Sonoran Preserve. It’s how we spend our weekends. We would hate to lose
anymore of the land, the atmosphere, the animals. Please save the land. Thank you
Our family enjoys the scenic drive down Sonoran Desert Drive. I’m saddened to hear they already have plans to
develop some of that land. The dessert landscape and easy access to trails from Fireside are unique to living in
Norterra and I would hate to see that change. It’s already becoming over crowded up here and traffic is
effected. Please consider preserving our beautiful desert landscape.
Want to keep area lower traffic
GREED at its finest asking to ignore the Desert Character Overlay District... PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS!!!!
Seriously...one more development along the route is no good. Too much traffic now for those who frequent the
area.
I have lived here for 10 years and watched the beauty of the desert being destroyed with development. The
plants, animals and the majestic beauty of the desert is ruined by the continued development until there is no
desert left. It is very sad.
I absolutely love the beauty of the desert and the opportunity we have to get out in the preserve to hike, run
and bike. I am an avid trail runner and hiker and would be devastated if we lose that ability just to make way for
more houses.
The Preserve is meant to be just that——preserved. Excess traffic, construction and increased carbon footprint
will endanger the flora and fauna of our beautiful desert. Please protect it!
1. Concerned about wildlife being displaced and natural habitats being significantly reduced 2. High occupancy
buildings coupled with houses will bring more traffic and pollution and impact the infrastructure 3. Impact on
city resources such as water especially scary as water levels are so low 4 impact to education facilities ‐ schools
are over crowded
We love biking on the path along the reserve with our 2 girls, crossing Sonoran Desert is already a bit nerve
wracking with current traffic, I can't imagine how much this would increase given the added homes. This is such
a beautiful stretch of road and adding these homes would greatly impact the noise, traffic and beauty of this
area. Not to mention the surrounding grocery stores, roadways and restaurants are already stretched so thin
because the number of homes has increased greatly without the other resources to support it!
The area should be preserved for enjoying the natural surroundings.
Please save the desert preserve, this is very important! Thank you
Need Preserve, otherwise we will lose out on the beautiful scenery and have way to much congestion.
I love this natural area. It is very important that the building be kept down as we are losing our natural areas to
concrete and overdevelopment. AZ does not have enough water for all of these homes/buildings. Traffic is
horrendous already. Please don’t do this.
It changes the whole landscape of our community. Every available space is being built and we are losing the
beauty of our area.
We need to keep as much nature untouched and beautiful.
The Sonoran preserve is just that, “A preserve”. It was specifically zoned to prevent this kind of development,
or any development for that matter. We use this area almost on a daily basis for hiking, biking and driving on
the parkway. If these projects are developed and built I will seriously consider leaving this area and moving to a
quieter place. These builders should look for other areas not designated as preserves to build their housing.
Preservation of our land is critical. While I accept development that has been approved, businesses need to
consider the impact to the surrounding area and growth for the sake of growth is not an acceptable plan.
Page 1279
Actions need to be taken to preserve the natural landscapes of Arizona. The degradation of lands is reaching a
tipping point. The area does not have the infrastructure, business, school capacity nor natural resources to
support this development. Corporate greed is advancing the rapid expansion of the Sonoran desert and we are
on the cusp of a major water shortages in the region. Enough, have some foresight for future generations for
Resource impact and cyclist safety
Keeping the integrity of the preserve intact while allowing current hiking, biking, and traffic levels to remain the
Have you seen how beautiful this portion of metro‐ Phoenix is. We absolutely do not need more and more and
more. We have enough people streaming into our state already, no need to encourage more.
The sonoran preserve is a beautiful place that is essential to maintaining the ecological balance for wildlife and
vegetation. The developers and owners knew the rules of the overlay district when they decided to develop,
and should be required to follow it. Not doing so benefits only them, and puts the damages on all other citizens.
The builder should be held to the character overlay that is in place to ensure the neighborhood fits into the
desert landscape.
The Preserve was the reason we moved here 14years ago. The city should not be able to re‐zone and stick with
the original plan to leave it for hiking biking etc. There is plenty of land on the west side of I‐17. Way too
much growth, traffic, and Desert lost to developers. with NO regard for the quiet life we enjoy In north Phoenix.
Too much housing buildout, let's slow it down
We need to keep our natural surroundings for the overall health of our environment.
We only get one chance to maintain the character of our community. Once altered, there is no going back.
We need more open space and already have enough homes!
As a former 12 year resident of the Desert Canyon subdivision (32nd / Beardsley) I have supported the efforts of
SOS‐P since the rezoning signs went up. I find it deeply ironic and fundamentally offensive that the first ask of
the developer is to set aside law and planning already in place that ensures what they only pretend to espouse
(“ environmental commitment to raising the bar for protecting and preserving the desert environment”).
We love the beauty and tranquility of the desert.
I hike on the trails of the Sonoran Preserve many times a week, enjoying the beauty of the untouched desert. It
would diminish the quality of the experience by adding more and more housing developments to the view.
The Sonoran preserve is a spot where I hike, bike and run 5‐6 times per week. I truly enjoy the beautiful natural
preserve this area has. The animals I see during my adventures is also priceless. I truly hope this petition
makes a change !
I live very close to the Sonoran Preserve. My family and I love living near the preserve because we get to enjoy
beautiful hiking and biking trails right in our back yard. The trails are clean, well maintained and much less
crowded than other trails in Phoenix, such as Camelback Mountain and Piestewa Peak. The Sonoran Preserve is
the reason we moved the North Valley. And we moved here based on the growth parameters identified by the
Desert Character Overlay District, which were instilled to safeguard the Preserve. Please don’t alter the growth
density plans, it’s not good for the viability of the Preserve and it’s not fair to the residents who moved to the
area based on the development measures in place.
It is important to save the Preserve and Drive because developers and their need for more and more money is
literally killing the desert and taking away all things that are indigenous to this perfect State I have lived in my
whole life, born and raised. I have worked up in this area for 20 plus years and it has been so sad to see the loss
of the desert. The Sonora Desert Drive is something so special and one of the few places left in the Valley that
makes you feel like you are really in the desert without thousands of pieces of property. Please do not take
away the beauty of these areas!!!
We love going to the preserve as a family, and having another major development project will only bring more
traffic, noise, and wildlife displacement. We need to do better and protect our wildlife and say no to money
Traffic will increase dramatically! Hiking and cycling will no longer be enjoyable and r safe.
Page 1280
My household enjoys both biking and hiking along the Sonoran Desert Drive several times a week. One of the
main reasons I moved out of the Kierland area was to escape the traffic/congestion. Please don't turn my
beautiful Sonoran Preserve into a traffic nightmare. Uphold the safeguards that make this preserve a treasure.
Thank you, Councilman Waring.
Me and my friends use that area to ride our bicycles and hike and just enjoy the desert and it would be
dangerous with it a lot more traffic out that way and it will destroy the beautiful desert environment please do
This will affect the local fauna and flora and compromise what is supposed to be a protected ecossystem.
Traffic is already heavy and dangerous for my wife who bikes and myself walking
It is nature at its finest. The desert is dwindling especially in this area with all of the commercial building and
housing going up. The hot air balloons are even running out of space to take off from and land on. Dove Valley
Road / Sonoran Desert Drive has become a speedway and dumping ground. It is a shame that people have such
disregard for such a beautiful area and putting up more housing will only make it worse. Years ago we were told
that no homes would be built off of that road. I know because I used to live in Carefree Crossings and attended
many meetings about it. Listen to the people for a change and leave this area alone. It was built for people to
enjoy it, not destroy it.
We need to preserve the beauty of the desert.
I use the preserve at least 3 times a week for fitness. Mountain biking, hiking, and trail running. Wildlife
encounters are always beautiful and their habitat must be preserved. The human population density in this area
is already getting to be more than what it can sustain.
We need to limit desert impact & traffic in the area as it’s already getting congested.
Phoenix is growing at a very rapid rate. If something is not done now to save lands, there will be no desert areas
left and all wildlife here will perish. We must preserve this unique Sonoran Preserve.
We love our desert and the fascinating wild life! Lets all work together to conserve our beautiful desert!
We need to preserve the hiking and biking trails as well as the bike lane on Desert Sonoran Drive to keep it safe
for pedestrians and cyclist.
The Sonoran Preserve is a beautiful area that lends this neighborhood a great amount of character and appeal.
Over‐development would greatly detract from this, leaving it just another sprawl.
I urge City Council to require Taylor Morrison to comply with Desert Character Overlay safeguards. We moved
to this area because of the close proximity to hiking and biking and close to nature. This is necessary for
people’s physical and mental well being.
We need to maintain the beauty of the valley. Areas need to be protected and respected so all can enjoy.
Quality of Life will be destroyed! Let us start with habitat destruction. Then let's discuss the water shortage.
September 2021, it was reported that the Bureau of Reclamation has declared a water shortage on the Colorado
River, which means that Arizona, along with Nevada and Mexico, will get less water than normal by 2022. If we
continue to destroy our desert with unnecessary development for the sake of the almighty dollar then we might
as well lift all restrictions. When will it end? When is enough growth enough? Maricopa County was the number
one county in the nation for growth in the past year. This needs to stop! We are destroying our human habitat
by allowing these developers to bully their way into these areas. Now let's discuss safety? Look at our Police
Dept or lack thereof. We can't sustain this ridiculous growth. Please do what you can to help preserve our
beautiful Sonoran Preserve!
Tjhis is the last strip of Sonoran Desert left in Phoenix. I'm sorrythe preserve doesn't border Dove Valley. Whats
done is gone do not make it worse by 3X the number of people
I prefer to keep the Somoran Preseve “wild” for all to enjoy. Please stop taking beautiful desert away from the
residents that moved here to be near it.
Primary reason we moved to this area from Houston is to avoid the glut of development and related traffic that
we had in Texas. Please let us retain the environment we fell in love with back in 2010.
Page 1281
Too many people and too much traffic is bad for the environment and the people living in the area, like me.
Traffic will likely significantly increase staying within the growth guidelines, so ignoring the guidelines and
increasing the number of dwellings in the area beyond the guidelines will make traffic and life even worse.
I love to hike the trails with my dog and my family. It is often the only exercise my aging parents get.
Everywhere near Sonoran preserve and desert drive constructions are happening, it’s a very beautiful hike place
to enjoy quality time with family and friends, as a neighborhood resident I would like to keep it beautiful and
not have homes after homes getting built there… there are hardly any community park getting built in the area..
I urge you not to ignore the Desert Character Overly District and over develop one of the few remaining
preserves in city limits so a developer can make more money. Please consider your constituents way of life and
safety over profits for a corporation. Thank you for your consideration.
Traffic is my main issue. As a Sonoran bike route it is becoming more and more dangerous for bikers. School
traffic on main roads and through neighborhoods also has become more dangerous. Wilderness can never be
recaptured once homes are built so we have a once in a lifetime duty to save land for conservation and wildlife.
Thanks for listening
The Sonoran Preserve is important to me because of the beauty if the area and the animals that call it home.
Sonoran Desert Drive needs to remain a less busy road so it is safe for the bicyclists that use it for exercise and
the people that walk the path along the road and preserve.
We need to preserve it for the wildlife that lives in it and keep the beauty of the desert environment in tact.
My friends and family and their pets walk there every day! Also it’s called a PRESERVE!!! Preserve it!
We need to preserve the beauty of our natural habitats. There are already plenty of places that are zoned for
building. Please do not let greed ruin our neighborhood.
Protect the Sonoran preserve
We live in the area and do not need to have more houses built, apartments, etc. The traffic is becoming
unbearable, and to abolish the desert is a terrible thing for the wildlife and beauty of the desert. I enjoy hiking
We love walking, & biking sonoran desert drive. It's nice to be active in that pristine desert. Please keep the
DCOD safeguards active
Ekosystem Preservation of natural wild life
I have children and grandchildren, outside the gates, it's TOTALLY UNSAFE TO RIDE BICKES, TRAFFIC IS
ABSOLUTELY 💯 INSANE WHATTTT IF IT WERE YOUR NEIGHBOR HOOD? Thank you
Volume of traffic will be too extreme and hiking, cycling and just walking will be negatively impacted.
Biological and cultural resources
I hike from Apache Wash frequently as well as the trails in Sonoran Preserve South and don’t want to see the
desert character of these areas impacted. Please hold Taylor Morrison to these rules. They were put in place for
a reason. Don’t allow them to disregard them.
This city is growing so fast & we need to preserve some of the beautiful desert landscape. If we keep building
more houses, we will have nothing left. We don’t need more houses!!
I firmly feel that natural areas have to be maintained and protected in order to maintain the beauty and balance
of our communities. Doubling or tripling the traffic on the Sonora Parkway within the areas of the Preserve will
most definitely create safety issues with cycling and walking for all folks wanting to enjoy the beauty of the
This place is an amazing getaway for families to go walk, cycle and hike. It’s nice to go over there without all of
the traffic that goes through there. It is such a beautiful scenery that should not be taken away.
Our family enjoys the wildlife and open beauty that the preserve provides very much.
There has been enough development in this area. Stop crowding out the wildlife.
Overcrowding is harmful to animals and to people. There are already too many car accidents due to the current
road infrastructure doesn’t support the number of people in this area. Therefore, more growth in this area will
lead to higher traffic volumes and increased car accidents. Thank you for this opportunity to voice my concern.
Page 1282
We love to hike this beautiful area. Also the drive down Sonoran parkway is incredible. We must preserve this
desert not only for human enjoyment but also the wildlife that call it home
This land is our closest access to nature. It is where I hike. It is where I take my children to visit the great horned
owl nest. This land is theirs—not to be traded in a land swap where a few people get rich at the expense of our
nature preserve.
It’s imperative to preserve and protect the wildlife and their natural habitat. This area is already exploding with
growth & traffic.
This area is beautiful and it would be a shame for it to be overdeveloped.
As a resident here, we need to preserve our natural habitat. You need to think about building more schools
before taking over the desert preserve and destroying the ecosystem just so you can make some builders happy
through these deals. If we can't preserve our "Preserve", then what is even the point?
I've lived in this area for many years and treasure the Sonoran Desert Preserve beyond measure. As an avid
hiker and lover of the unique beauty, plant life and wildlife of the Sonoran Desert, I feel privileged to be able to
enjoy this natural area as part of my "everyday." I'm also aware and incredibly proud of the hard work and
careful thought that went into preserving this land in the first place. It was a job so very well done, and I would
be incredibly disappointed and dispirited to see those efforts and safeguards dismantled in any way.
We chose to move to Sonoran Foothills to be close to the desert landscape and away from the dense population
of the city. We understood that the city had protected the areas surrounding the preserve by requiring certain
standards and limiting the number of homes that can be built. The requirements that were in place while the
Sonoran foothills community was being built, maintain the overall integrity of the surrounding desert. There is a
mix of apartment homes, patio homes and homes with lots. All were required to follow strict landscaping
guidelines to match the desert. Why aren’t these standards being upheld for any future development? It is
evident that greed is now winning. The home builders goal is to build as many houses as will be allowed as this is
most profitable for them. They are NOT concerned with the impact this will have on traffic, current residents or
the desert. Also, it appears the city is trying to solve the housing shortage by putting in a disproportionate
number of high density dwellings from I‐17 to Cave Creek.
There is already a staggering amount of traffic between the preserves and additional housing per acre only
harms these sacred areas. We are growing at a staggering rate and sacrificing our beautiful lands and existing
safe guards isn't the right approach to addressing this growth. The land and homes will sell and the only reason
to increase hones per acre is to increase their profits.
Original 2006 owner who has seen this area grow and change. I’m very concerned about the population over
expansion in this area. I live right off Dove Valley which has already become unsafe due to traffic volume and
lack of proper traffic signals (some of which are on the way). However, I don’t believe Dove Valley was ever
intended to hold the kind of volume it will experience if growth is not governed. I for one wholeheartedly
support the enforcement of the Desert Character Overlay District. Thank you
An agreement was made to limit the number of homes for the area, why now is it ok to go back on that. Will
bring more traffic and ruin to area from overpopulation.
The Sonoran Preserve is a special and somewhat rare piece of Phoenix. It provides beautiful trails and vistas for
all Phoenicians within the city limits. As the city continues to grow I believe we need to preserve these few
natural spaces for all to enjoy.
When we moved from Wisconsin we specifically picked the Sonoran Desert Preserve area because it was so
beautiful and peaceful. Please do not ruin it by putting up homes there. It is a protected preserve for a reason ‐‐
to keep it natural.
Way too much traffic
This area needs to be preserved as originally designed in order for the members of this community to enjoy a
place to get away from all the over development.
Page 1283
Protecting preserve areas within an urban community is important and contributes to a healthy quality of life.
Respectful development along the perimeter of a preserve protects the integrity of the native area. I want the
desert overlay left in place as it is the legal vehicle created with intention to accomplish this. We need to be
forward thinking as we approve developments especially when they border preserve areas that were acquired
and built with significant personal and financial resources!
Desert preservation. Water conservation
The Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive must under all circumstances remain intake and undisturbed
Preserving open spaces is becoming more and more important as they are being lost at a alarming rate.
Increasing housing density is damaging with increased traffic, pollution and water usage.
Our house backs up to the desert. We bought that house because it backs up to the desert, I want to to keep
our view and our slower simple lifestyle there and not turn its into a big city feel.
To preserve the beautiful views of the desert and maintain wildlife and landscape.
it's a natural treasure that is special and needs to be protected.
The Phoenix metro area is quickly consuming our natural wildlife. The Sonoran preserve and areas around the
preserve are blessings to those near them. An escape from the overgrowth of population.
Preserve natura
I am an avid mountain and road cyclist in THIS area, especially! I also hike and run in the preserve. Safe to say I
am absolutely for the preservation of the Sonoran Preserve. I live in an area very near where a housing
development is under way and the amount of houses being built will be over double what was originally zoned.
Please let those that run the show consider the longer (negative) lasting impacts of high‐density development to
what we have all found profoundly beautiful and desiring of this area; the Sonoran Desert!
I have lived in this area for 11 years and have been walking those trails for just as long. It is an amazing preserve
that I treasure walking every single day. The scenery is beautiful and the wildlife thrives in the area. Losing any
portion of this place would be a disgrace to this gorgeous piece of land that should be protected for the people
of our area. Please reconsider this, i am beyond disappointed to hear that this is even a thought. Please save our
Northern Phoenix is already getting overrun by new developments. Would be nice to keep some lands in their
natural state so we can enjoy the beauty it brings
My main hiking spot, beautiful views, would think u are out in the wilderness
I am concerned because my backyard will face the six lane road. As it is the two lane road(dove valley and
Sonoran dessert drive) is driven like a freeway and most people do not go the speed limit. I could just imagine
what the six lane would be like behind us. When we purchased this home we were not made aware of the plans
the city had for this area. Very disappointed. Also Verdin having 1400 hundred homes would really make the
traffic crazier than it already is right now.. like I said very disappointing!!
Desire to maintain the nature preserve and to limit traffic and related safety hazards.
No need for more development eating up our desert.
We moved to our current home to enjoy the benefits of having access to the Sonoran Preserve. The Desert
Character Overlay District was created to preserve the integrity of this precious commodity, if it is ignored, the
beauty and recreational benefits of the preserve will be significantly reduced.
I chose this area because of the preserve and hiking trails. We love the motorcycle rides through the area on our
way up to Cave Creek. I already think they are building too much and it’s going to overpopulate and ruin the
very reason we chose to live in this area.
I walk the desert everyday it is vital to keep it preserved . Arizona is in danger , water shortage , wildlife please
keep preserve
Our wildlife is being displaced and soon will not have a place to live. People want them killed as they are afraid
of them! We will live in a denser area and it will soon feel like NY City! We must find a balance for all.
Page 1284
Conservation will protect the wildlife. Driving them out of their natural habitat could put some animals at risk of
extinction. There are other desert areas/land that could be built on. Preserving will help reduce our footprint
and help reduce traffic and pollution.
Keeping some semblance of the desert lifestyle is why we moved here. Do not ignore the safeguards. Reduce
the number of housing units. Why do you want to do business with a company which clearly does not respect
nature, but only the economic bottom line ‐$
This would cause pollution dust noise and would be harmful to our health
I am concern about the beauty of the Desert Landscape and more concerned about the increase in traffic that
will be on Dove Valley/Sororan Desert Drives. Besides Verdin there is also the new semiconductor plant going
up west of us that will increase traffic. There is also 2 other new housing developments going up on Dove Valley
and also Sonoran Desert Dr west of Paloma Pkwy. This will also increase traffic tremendously on Dove
Valley/Sonoran Desert Drives. Please be concerned that traffic could increase 10 times the current rate and that
your plan to expand lanes is already insufficient.
The Sonoran preserve area is vital to providing a habitats for all the wonderful creatures and wildlife in the area.
It also provides for great walking trails for people to enjoy and get exercise while exploring all that Arizona has
The Sonoran Preserve and surrounding area are why we moved to the North Valley 7 years ago. The natural
beauty and outdoor activities make it our special home. We need to manage and control growth so it will not
negatively impact our surroundings with excessive traffic. Thank‐you.
Preserve land is sacred and should maintained as suck to keep the value to it's community members.
Traffic on the preserve road is already quite busy during rush hour. Adding more homes will increase the danger
of the road and damage the beautiful desert.
The beautiful hiking biking and walking trails!! What they are proposing is way too many homes for in the
middle of the preserve!!
I moved to this location in 2019 to be away from congestion of traffic and buildings. I am already concerned
about the traffic on Sonoran Parkway/Dove Valley. I love the open desert and trails and lack of buildings. This
area needs these open spaces to remain as building and development is moving closer to the preserve on all
sides. Help save some precious desert/animals/freedom and peaceful nightblack skies!
As a resident of a nearby community I am concerned that the traffic that will be generated by the proposed
Verdin community will present many safety concerns. The Preserve provides a tranquil environment that will
most likely change dramatically in character if this densely populated community is built. I don’t mind some
building along the route but only if it is not populated as densely as some of the surrounding developments.
We need to save our desert preserve and wildlife. There are plenty if other placex in the area and in Phoenix
where it is more appropriate and less disruptive to build.
Destroying the desert, views and too much traffic on Dove Valley/Sonoran PkwyN which also funnels to Jomax
where many school‐aged child ride bikes and walk.
This is my neighborhood..I live here. I hike these beautiful trails five times a week. There are plenty of acres of
desert in other areas. People come from all over the valley to hike and bike here.This land has been set aside
for this and should not be taken away.
I am signing this because we would not have moved to this area had we known it was even possible for a
developer to unilaterally request a community density plan, carefully and deliberately produced and agreed
upon, be thrown out so a company can increase profit. I question the ethics of a company that would even
propose it. I question the ethics of a local government that would even entertain it.
Mark Dotterer
Marcella Mccormack
Page 1285
This is a beautiful and vibrant part of our community. Don’t destroy it by adding additional residential
development. Once those houses get in there, they are going to be complaining and advocating for commercial
development because they don’t want to drive 20 minutes to shops and restaurants. Before we know it, all of
the preserve will be gone. The hiking trails, the nature, and the area is pristine.
It is important to me to keep our beautiful desert open and the way nature intended it to be. We are the desert
southwest and everyone should be able to enjoy the beautiful scenery. It does not do anything or anyone any
good to fill it with homes and commercial properties that would only increase traffic, smog, trash and unwanted
things. Our desert animals need their home and do not need to be pushed out due to unwanted construction.
I believe there are multiple reasons for keeping our views for all to enjoy ‐ to preserve the desert and the
animals ‐ so we can enjoy the solace in this wonderful area by walking, biking, driving or just plain relaxing in the
outdoors. Also driving on this Sonoran stretch of road currently needs more restrictions ‐ such as traffic lights at
all intersections for turning. Much speeding ‐ need to have more monitoring of speed requirements. Adding
more housing is just going to add to a lose of the desert preserve and impossible street/road conditions. When
we built our home here, we were told that there were restrictions to keep our desert preserved.
We live along the Sonoran Preserve. We bought here because it was a quiet peaceful area to raise kids and
explore nature. Please don’t allow more homes to destroy this area of nature. It will ruin the bike trail and
hiking trails and cause a lot more traffic in the area.
Concerned about traffic, School crowding, and preserving the desert. They need to keep the desert safe guards
in place.
We are losing the beauty and integrity of the area that makes the Phoenix valley iconic.
I moved to this area to enjoy the desert and the wildlife associated with the environment. Developers have one
objective ‐ money. We must preserve what is left of this beautiful landscape
My husband and I moved into the area specifically for the trails and wilderness of the Sonoran Preserve. We
hike the trails at least twice a week with our dogs. Please do not allow more encroachment just for the sake of
making more money! I am a retired registered nurse and served the indigent populations and can't afford to
move again. Please stop this!
I hike in the preserve almost daily, and would like to continue to enjoy the nature and the solitude. There are so
many other areas to build along the I‐17 corridor, so why cause more damage to the beautiful Arizona desert
and the wildlife living there. I used to hike Thunderbird, but that's a couple foothills with development all
around, whereas the Sonoran Preserve is just that ‐ a preserve to protect wildlife and allow people to enjoy
nature. Please don't allow any more development of the land!
ASU has spent millons in studies, to this DAY, of the wildlife is THIS IMMEDIATE area. The area between these
two washes are a habitat for species that exist NO where else. Contact ASU if you don't believe me, they have a
professor that performs studies out there...they have for many years! In addition, the access roads proposed
are between two bridges that are TOO low. There needs to be a NEW study performed on how the destruction
of the plains will affect run off and increased volume in the washes! Otherwise, one heavy monsoon might wash
the people and homes away.
We moved to this area specifically to enjoy the natural beauty of the desert Hiking, biking, and walking is an
important part of the north valley lifestyle Please do not allow developers to ruin it with dense urban housing
It's rare coming from Vegas to have such a natural landscape. It's so beautiful to have natural landscape and to
have the desert wildlife around our home. There's plenty of other places they can build and they're building
now. Save the preserve and the wildlife. They can build somewhere else that isn't here.
I’ve lived in the preserve area since I was very little. We need to keep the desert a desert, our native animals
are continually being forced to co habitate with humans and it’s not going welk. Continue to give them their
space so that we can all live together without hostile interaction
I am concerned with the number of people packed into a small space. Not only would this increase traffic to an
unmanageable level but will ruin the desert in this area.
Page 1286
We have enough housing in our area. Please keep the land open so that families can continue to enjoy our
Sonoran Preserve.
This zoning would be uncharacteristic of the Sonoran preserve and city park surrounding the site.
The preserve gives us hiking trails and allows everyone to enjoy the beauty of the Arizona desert and wildlife. It
would also dramatically decrease property values for the people voting for you to remain in office.
The Sonoran preserve is just that, a Preserve. It preserves many species of plants and wildlife that is indigenous
to the area. It is vitally important that we preserve this area for our children and their children.
We need to keep the open land and what makes our area great.
I love hiking in the preserve. Anyone who intends on building anywhere close to it needs to follow the rules.
Our desert is at risk. We need you to protect it by requiring the builder to do the right thing.
Preserve landscape, Mountain View’s, prevent traffic
With so much growth in Arizona & Phoenix in particular, it is vital to retain the open spaces for all residents to
use and enjoy ‐ there was great foresight when determining preserves and buffered lands around them. The
roads ‐ current and even proposed new ones ‐ won’t be able to safely support the sudden surge of vehicles and
will most definitely increase the traffic volume and many drivers, bikers and pedestrians will experience a
greater risk of accidents. Please listen to the residents in the area that will be most impacted. Thank you.
This land is important to keep more open than crowded!
I have lived in this area for twenty years and it is getting so crowded and overbuilt. We must preserve open
outdoor space for people to enjoy the peace of the desert and recreation areas that are our Arizona treasures
Aaron Cushner
the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards were put in place to keep this specific and unique area from
overdevelopment and should not be overturned due to developer greed.
To prevent additional congestion and traffic and to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
I know that growth in our area needs to happen but it shouldn’t be so much that it take away from the Preserve
and the reasons we moved here.
It's wrong to ignore our Desert Character Overlay District! We bought our home here because of these
protections, and we love our desert! Thank you!
Will Ruin the wildlife and nature surrounding the preserve in addition to increasing the already challenging
traffic issues on Sonoran desert drive
Uniquely beautiful desert must be protected. Overly dense housing not consistent with that preservation.
Living in Desert Vistas subdivision since it's existence 15yrs ago has been an absolute blessing and we expect to
keep it that way. With that, we enjoy hiking, biking and walking frequently all year around. Over time the
"preserve" area has seen a HUGE increase in vehicles, accidents, speeding, crime, pollution & noise to name just
a few. Our understanding has always been that no further housing/development of any kind would continue
past our subdivision into the Sonoran Preserve. That certainly did not happen. Sonoran Desert Drive is so busy
NOW that adding additional housing will not only threaten people but the natural terrain and wildlife habitat.
That's a resounding NO WAY!
I hike and trail run in the preserve at least five times a week since I live within walking distance to the Vista
trailhead. It is a beautiful and relaxing and meditative time for me believe it should be left as is like, as I
understand the story, the original owner wanted it to stay, which I agree with.
Becasue we hike the trails regularly and the feeling of being lost in nature so close to home is special. It should
be protected and I hope my daughter can enjoy it the same way one day.
We moved here from Wisconsin almost 4 years ago. 100% the reason we selected to live up here in the North
valley was because of the Sonoran preserve. We chose to not be inside the 101 on purpose.please don't allow
the Sonoran desert drive and beautiful desert around it to be taken over with cars and traffic.
Page 1287
Cycling and hiking in the area
Since living in Phoenix this has been a place where I can get away to escape the noise of the city. Please don’t
take that away from us. For a lot of people, having a place to get away to is vital to every day life.
We need to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
Arizona is growing too rapidly for its own good. The demand for water is only going to increase with these
unnecessary expansions. Destroying the natural habitats of the wildlife that surrounds is also harmful to the
already damaged ecosystem. There is no necessity to continue to tear up the desert to accommodate an exodus
of out of state buyers. They can find a more sustainable environment to live, Arizona is already overly populated
and adding excessive traffic flow to an underdeveloped part of the city is asinine. Keep Arizona wild.
I live less then a mile away and it’s a beautiful area that should remain the way it is. We hike, bike, and drive to
grandparents house on this beautiful road/preserve. Please let it stay beautiful and let us continue to make
memories here.
We moved up to this area because of the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please keep our beautiful land the
way it is.
As someone who regularly drives, hikes, and bikes this area, it’s important to me, my family, my community,
and Phoenix at large to protect these kind of “open/brown/green spaces”. There are plenty of places around
Phoenix for development ‐ the Sonoran Preserve should not be one of them.
Maintain the beauty and areas to hike.
I run and cycle on the parkway and traffic is already dangerous, especially near the passing zones. I also hike
extensively and if many more houses are built, the views will become less spectacular than they are now. In
addition, wildlife would be affected by overdevelopment
I and my family moved to this area to enjoy the preserve. While we understand there is growth in the area, it
was done under the rules and regulations set forth. I would ask that all builders comply.
We use the preserve for hiking and horseback riding. Heavy traffic volume can create a hazard for horses, even
at a distance.
I travel Sonoran Desert Drive every day because I live right off of it. It is a beautiful drive, but also one that is
very serene and peaceful. I am concerned that allowing the Verdin community to be built at the requested
density it will cause a great impact and stress to the drive through the Preserve. Even if the road is expanded to
more lanes, this road will become a dangerous route for the bikers and hikers in the area, not to mention the
drivers. Please do not allow the density for this new community as requested!
1. There has been poor oversight with planning roadways to keep up with the existing development in the
Sonoran area. 2. Sonoran Desert Drive is supposed to be a scenic drive and is utilized by many cyclists and has a
gorgeous walking path. The increase win traffic will be a further danger to cyclists and pedestrians. 3. Many of
us have to keep moving further and further out of the city to get away from all the Phoenix traffic and live in a
peaceful community. The existing planning with the “water project” has been a nightmare with construction and
took 8 months to complete. We already have problems with adequate water in our area and other areas of
Phoenix area under water restrictions. Where is all the water going to come from to support all of these houses.
5. Schools are already overcrowded and there is already a problem with staffing for school buses and teachers.
How are we going to support an increase of additional kids and families when we cannot support the ones
already living here adequately?
I love being able to enjoy the beautiful preserve without all the traffic. The preserve is what makes city living do‐
Page 1288
I have lived at this address for 20 years and have watched the area grow. My wife and I have hiked and biked in
the Sonoran Preserve area hundreds of times, and now we have introduced our children to a love of nature
through seeing Olive the owl on Hawk's Nest Trail and wildflower blooms biking along the Apache Wash trail. In
the middle of a growing city, this Preserve is an oasis that allows residents from near and far to relax and escape
the pace of city life. It magically transports visitors to a place that feels quiet and free. Please help us preserve
this for us and future visitors!
Traffic, keep the beautiful desert, water resources
The infrastructure is not setup for a development of this size and the tax payers shouldn’t bear the cost to
We have 2 parks there, we need to connect these parks. People live here for the openness of the land. We need
more open spaces, not more house's.
Please preserve this pristine piece of Sonoran Desert for the native flora and fauna and for our future
My family lives in Sonoran Foothills. We chose this beautiful area because of the gorgeous desert preserve. We
love our out of the way pocket and want to protect the gorgeous pristine desert from further development.
I live in the neighborhood and don’t want them to change our desert look it’s very important
The development will increase the footprint traffic and damage to these natural areas and habits. We must look
forward to responsible growth in unity with our surroundings and not just perceived revenues.
I am an avid hiker. I enjoy being able to see nature, plants and animals. We are already taking so much natural
habitat from desert life. Overcrowding the preserve area increases pollution by humans and their machines.
Furthermore, light and noise pollution create additional issues. Please conserve our preserve.
As local residents, my family loves to hike at the Apache wash trailhead and the trails behind Sonoran
foothills/Fireside. My family’s Christmas pictures have been taken in the surrounding desert for years. All the
surrounding neighbors have the desert overlay, which is more important than ever with the water shortage in
Phoenix. If you plant the appropriate trees, cactus etc., NO WATER IRRIGATION is needed. Our trees were
watered deep for the first two years, then turned off. 15 years after NO WATER, beautiful and thriving. You have
my address, drive on by. PLEASE keep the beautiful desert overlay our Sonoran Preserve deserves.
I live on the South‐West edge of the Sonoran Preserve. I am an avid outdoors person that loves the wild flora
and fauna and am concerned about destroying the natural beauty of the preserve as well as the natural habitat
of wild life. I believe that we need to prevent this oasis for recreation and wild life refuge to be altered.
I moved to this house 10 years ago to move out of the “city” and be near desert‐stop building so much up here!
We cannot keep moving the wild habitat out of their homes! Moving into this community we were told this
reserve was here to stay so we would never have to worry about build going up on it ‐ clearly, that has changed.
Do not let greed destroy our quality of life.
This is a beautiful scenic preserve that has already experienced housing growth, wild fires caused by humans,
and an increase in traffic. We have lived in this area for 15 years and specifically love that it used to be quiet and
just outside of the city. No thank you to further developments! Preserve the land, wildlife, and natural growth!
Love the beauty that this area brings to all.
I've lived on the north side of town my entire life and thr natural desert is why I continue to live away from the
noisy city. The Sonoran preserve has protection in place to conserve the natural environment and this
development is threatening that protection for the sake of the American dollar. We live up here for the wide
open space, peace and quiet, uninterrupted views and opportunity to enjoy nature. The traffic that's started to
grow is threatening this with speeders flying by at 70+MPH, endangering bikers, walkers and nature. Please do
now allow for more development than this preserve can handle and do not threaten the natural ecosystem by
We back up to Dove Valley.....the traffic has already increased exponentially over the past few years and people
use this road as a freeway....safety for our kids and everyone in our community is a huge concern.
Page 1289
I live in the Sonoran desert north of Phoenix, Don’t want it destroyed by continuing building. Leave it in it’s
natural state, so we can enjoy the desert for generations please .
I live on Dove Valley and the traffic is already horrendous. We also love driving "the back way" when we're
headed to Scottsdale for the scenic route. We would hate to see that go and hate for it to be filled with more
homes than are currently allowed (none would be the perfect amount in my opinion). The schools are already
far too filled for the existing amount of homes and the roads were not built for the amount of traffic that
currently passes through on a daily basis. There are so many reasons to not allow more homes!! We moved up
here to be away from the millions that live in metro and we'd like to keep it that way.
I enjoy hiking and biking in the area. Houses and cars really ruin the beauty of it.
Please do not overcrowd our area and stress our resources. Sonoran Desert Drive is beautiful and offers
wonderful opportunity to be outside and healthy. Please preserve this area.
Me and my family and friends are all avid trail runners with great respect for our wildlife and natural
ecosystems. I don’t dispute the need for housing but the Desert Character Overlay District put the standards in
place for exactly this reason ‐ to prevent developers from overdevelopment that would ruin the NATURAL
ecosystem. I applaud them for some of the measures they propose in planning but that will never make up for
any zoning change and quite frankly is hypocritical. Please make sure Verdin complies with the current standard
I will not vote for an elected official that allows this to happen
This area is important to us as we hike and bike. Knowing that preserve will always be here made buying our
home easy. We would like for all development to mind and take care of our desert spaces. There is a reason
the Desert Character Overlay District was created. To ignore this would be a tragedy.
Too much traffic. Dangerous to have additional traffic where lots of bikers use the bike path. Why not build on
the other side of 17 instead of near the preserve. Help of wildlife not be pushed out even more.
Taking away the sceneries wildlife and open park trails to enjoy. Once you start building gets crowded needing
more wider roads taking away from the above
Safe and beautiful area to hike and bike.
As a local real estate agent, I understand the need for more housing in the metro area. But there are many
other locations that are not in the middle of a preserve. Outdoor recreation and the beauty of the Sonoran
Desert are reasons why people relocate to the area or purchase vacation homes. Having the preserve remain a
preserve and not another housing project is vital to our community.
Being surrounded by the Sonoran Desert Preserve is probably the biggest reason that we built the house that
we live in now. It is just so beautiful to be able to drive home after a long day's work and enjoy God's creation at
it's finest. It is truly breathtaking and spectacular. Many people flock to Apache Wash Trailhead recreational
area to enjoy this beautiful natural setting through hiking and mountain biking. It would be a travesty to
overpopulate this area and ruin the enjoyment of the preserve for generations to come. It just wouldn't be the
same. Not to mention the destruction of the natural habitat of so many desert creatures that make the preserve
their home. I witness this first hand while living in the Sonoran Gate Community. These animals do not deserve
to be displaced and have their homes destroyed. The line has to be drawn somewhere in order to maintain a
level of natural beauty in our urban areas. This seems like as good a time as any to make a conscious decision to
halt the human encroachment on the habitat of all of God's innocent creatures and keep this little slice of
My family and I love to hike this area, especially to feel like we’re away from city life and enjoying the natural
outdoors. That is one of the reasons why we chose to live in this area was because of the preserve.
We moved up to this area to enjoy the beauty and tranquility of the area. Now it is being threatened. We
moved up to this area to see our beautiful dessert in its natural habit, and now it's being threatened. We moved
up here because it was a great dream come true, and now that dream is again being threatened by those
wishing to make many dollars off the land and environment that belongs to us all. Please, please let's stop this
travesty. Thanks for reading my input. We just so love it up here and hope for no more growth and
Keep population down to preserve the wildlife
Page 1290
This road is a quick north valley traffic bypass that remains somewhat traffic free for now. There is great hiking
and desert views. For profit expansion in this area would destroy that.
We specifically moved to this area b/c of the preserve and the peacefulness that it brings to our lives and
neighborhood. District guidelines are in place for a reason and should not be adjusted for a greedy developer.
I think the peace and quiet and a safe place for the Sonoran wildlife to roam freely is vital. We cannot keep
pushing these animals out of there natural habitats. Traffic on Sonoran desert drive has already increased and
to increase it more is simply careless as families riding bikes will be at an increased risk
The Sonoran Preserve is beautiful Natural landscape that keeps the heat down vs concrete, provides
opportunities for walking, hiking, biking ect. Many of the residents in this area including myself moved up here
due to these walking and hiking trails. Also, the traffic on Sonoran Desert drive is already bad and adding more
homes will only make it worse. Please listen to the residents and save the Sonoran Preserve.
The drive along Sonoran Desert Drive is very relaxing and calming. I enjoy hiking and I would like it to remain a
desert oasis to enjoy.
Would cause an overpopulated area that is meant to be preserved for nature. Would ruin hiking and biking do
to the amount of traffic and would become dangerous. Would effect the views and the ability for people enjoy
the scenery. Would also effect the wildlife pushing the coyotes and javelinas into residential areas. Which they
belong in the desert.
Beauty of the natural desert provides peace & tranquility in this world of unrest. Don’t destroy the zen
My family and I enjoy biking and hiking in that area, which is part of the reason we live where we do. We believe
the City of Phoenix made a informed and important decision to maintain the wilderness, beauty and safety of
that area for a reason and would hate to see that decision overturned.
Hiking and the overall access to the outdoors
It is one of the most beautiful areas of the valley. Please dont spoil it.
The Sonoran Desert Drive is a beautiful natural area that needs to be preserved for future generations. There
are plenty of other places to develop closer to the I‐17
We live in this area for its natural beauty and we do not want to lose that.
I bought the house for privacy and quietness. The sound from the cars already are a issue, the amount of
roadkill is brutal and water shortages have began. Taylor morrison has so many issues with the houses in
Sonoran gate , they are not prepared for this project. Pollution and traffic is just not right in this area. Why
wouldn't they build on the area on cave creek road. It's open, houses have no issues. This seems the state is
taking money to push this project through. Who's paying for the roads and why would you put a road up by the
state hiking trails. This ruins the landscape !
Please adhere to the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards. We need space to walk, bike, play and enjoy
the natural beauty of the desert.
I feel that they are over building in Phoenix. Have limited water supply. The traffic is already congested and
difficult to around.
I love where I live and the traffic is manageable. The mountains and hiking trails are beautiful and right now
there’s congestion when I hike with bicyclists and hikers. More people would make hiking and the outdoors
troublesome for parking and just hiking the trails.
I grew up in cave creek which is right on the other side and I know the value to this desert landscape and the
peace it brings to others. It’s natures playground let it be
Preserving the open space, flora, and fauna native to the area
The natural desert is one of the most unique places and somehow we have to realize it is something we cannot
afford to destroy. I understand the need for homes and such, but please leave this area be. Please!
Keep the desert the desert and keeping it natural where I bike and hike
Page 1291
I love driving on the Sonora Desert Dr. and seeing our beautiful desert. I and my family members also enjoy
hiking and biking on the trails.
Keep the beauty and peacefulness of this special area. Protect wilderness and cyclists. Cut down on traffic. It is a
rare beauty we cannot afford to lose.
My family and I hike at this preserve every week. I take friends to it, have had Girl Scout events, and even
volunteer to clean up the trails. It is one of the most gorgeous gems in Phoenix. In addition to that, numerous
animals call it their home. It is not ok to take that away from the people of Phoenix.
My family hikes and mountain bikes several times per week on these trails. We truly appreciate this land and
would not want its inhabitants to be disrupted any further than they already are.
I'm mainly just concerned with the increased amount of traffic new housing developments will create.
The development that is already out there detracts from the natural environment immensely. Additional
development will only make this worse. Build elsewhere...just not here please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The desert is slowly vanishing which breaks my heart. The Sonoran Preserve should be as it is titled “PRESERVE
This area can not support anymore homes. We don’t have the commercial needed. Also, we need to preserve
the desert. That is a popular scenic drive and hiking area.
It was designed to be protected. It is that simple. There is already too many cars going through that preserve.
Natural beauty
My family and I enjoy walking, hiking, and driving by the preserve and the planned Verdin development on a
daily basis. It is a highlight of our day and one of the only areas in Phoenix that people can enjoy the natural
beauty of the desert, because it maintains the desert character overlay. It would be very disheartening if this
beautiful surrounding area loses its desert character. I trust that members of the Phoenix city council will reject
the request to maintain the desert character overlay. Thank you.
The volume of traffic is already out of control on Sonoran Desert Drive. Please keep the Sonoran Preserve as it
Already getting too crowded in the area. And the desert preserve is in jeopardy.
It is a beautiful preserve that holds opportunity to connect with nature, and allow us all in the valley to have
natural habitat for wildlife and flora and fauna that are so important to keeping the integrity of our great state.
Concerned about too much growth and traffic. Moved up here in 2005 for the beautiful open Sonoran Desert.
Absolutely do not want to see that all developed ‐ we do not need anymore housing or apartments.
All of the building is already over done. It's taking away any part of the beauty left in the area. My family does
alot of biking and hiking in that area and it doesn't need to be ruined with more structures. Leave AZ alone and
stop overtaking anything left. The traffic is insane. Why do we need more of it in the area?! That drive is one of
the last drives left near by that is ALMOST untouched.
As a native of AZ, north Phoenix particularly, I’ve seen the increase in population boom over the last 20 years.
The traffic, noise, crowds are destroying the natural beauty and peacefulness of N Phx. Also… the water! Where
will all the water come from to sustain such a population? We don’t want to end up like Anthem!!
Beautiful hiking area and bike riding.
Beauty, Congestion, MTB trails
Being able to walk , enjoying the beautiful landscape the LORD make.
Congestion. Rezoning opens doors to more rezoning. Will cost the county money to widen roads. And I like less
people around.
Destroying the beauty and traffic concerns.
Destroying the beauty, and traffic concerns.
Greg Laursen
I am concerned about the increase in traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley roads. I would like to see
this portion of the desert remain protected.
Page 1292
I am concerned about the volume of cars, traffic and safety. There have already been fatal accidents for
motorists and bicyclists on that road/area. I am concerned about ruining the integrity of the beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. PLEASE don’t let this happen!!
I am extremely concerned about over building at the expense of the natural desert. Loss of natural
settings/habitat, increased traffic, speeding, congestion, crime, burglary, all the issues that come with high
I am signing this petition for multiple reasons ‐ we do not have the proper roadways to support additional
housing units and want to preserve the beauty of the region
I believe it is vital to preserve the Sonoran desert lands. The more we build the more we push wild life out of
their habitats and into neighborhoods where they inevitably will get injured or killed. If we keep building on
these lands we won't be the Sonoran desert anymore, we will just have to explain to our grandkids what the
Sonoran desert once looked like.
I do not want the massive increase in traffic it is already horrible in this area. We do not need more housing
there are plenty already being built.
I don’t want to see traffic increase. I would like to see the desert stay peaceful and empty.
I enjoy taking hikes with my family and dog. It is so wonderful to get out of the city and neighborhood to
experience nature. We also enjoy taking our bikes along the Sonoran Desert Drive to safely ride without traffic
and congestion. I do not want to lose this ability to development. There are so many other areas available for
development without jeopardizing the beauty that is preserved in this area.
I frequent the Sonoran Preserve 2‐3 times a week and my husband road bikes 4‐5 times a week in the bike
lanes. We enjoy being able to go enjoy the desert without having to see home after home. We are also in a
drought and putting more homes up does not help address the issue. Please think about keeping more open
spaces for everyone to enjoy who already lives here it is getting crowded enough.
I go hiking there to appreciate the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert and the breathtaking views of the
McDowell Mountains and Boulders of Carefree etc.One if the last pristine places to go up here in the N Valley .I
do not want more housing subdivisions and apartment buildings obstructing the views along with more traffic
congestion coming from the constant relentless overbuilding of housing presently occurring .Please save this
beautiful,natural corridor which is used for hiking and biking along with the equestrian trails for horseback
riding.Please allow local residents a sacred piece of land to cherish for us now as well as the generations to
come ,we need somewhere to go that we can take pride in .The Natural beauty of our desert lands is what drew
me to the area 42 years ago please Preserve it!!
I have lived in this area for 17 yrs. and we are raising our daughters here. My family enjoys the trails and hiking. I
am also a teacher at on of the neighborhood K‐8 schools. Our school is busting at the seams even before all the
new construction being completed. You can't keep overloading the schools and roads to crisis points.
I hike the preserve almost every day, year round. Exponential increases in large commercial trucks and
unforced city and state (ARS 28‐955) traffic laws related to excessive noise ruin the wild experience of North
Phoenix' best attraction. When the city pushed Dove Valley Road through the desert 10 years ago, I was a
member of the Sonoran Citizens Improvement Association. At Phoenix City Council meetings I brought up the
noise issue and stated that the city will never enforce the noise statutes on the books, because the police were
over worked and had more important issues ton deal with. An that was 10 years ago before the defend the
police movement decimated law enforcement moral. 10 years ago, City Council told me not to worry, noise
issues would be addressed. I knew it wasn't true a decade ago. And I have sadly been proven right. The city
needs to finish the Sonoran Desert Drive extension off the 303 as per MAG and the city's (so far) empty
promises from a decade ago. I have a long memory. And I vote. https://sonorancitizens.wordpress.com/
I like living in the city with a place to go(the preserve) where you feel like the city is so far away. I hike, mountain
bike and enjoy seeing the wildlife as well as nature in general.
I live in the area and my family and I walk, bike, and hike in the preserve daily. I also see all the animals who live
in and rely on the preserve.
Page 1293
I love all the preserved open desert. If there are rules and guidelines already established for a certain amount of
homes built, we need to stay within that, and stop over building whenever a builder wants to cram more homes
I moved here because of the nature. I grew up in the country and this was as close to it as I could get. I love the
nature and the quiet that we all paid premium dollar for as well
I moved here to get away from the high volume of homes and traffic in Gilbert and to enjoy the beautiful
surrounding desert trails and nature paths north and south of Sonoran Desert / Dove Valley.
I often go hiking in the preserve for the peacefulness, seeing wildlife, and being surrounded by nature. I bike ride
along Sonoran desert drive and feel safe due to very little traffic. I will be devastated if homes get built on our
beautiful preserve. Animals will suffer, people will suffer, and preserve plant life will be killed. This should not
happen. Preserve means preserve!
I purchased my home in Sonoran Foothills in 2010 primarily because of the desert character overlay and how
the neighborhood blends in with the natural surroundings. I moved to this area because of the desert character
and would like it to stay that way as it expands.
I spend a great deal of time hiking and biking there. The north valley is quickly being developed and it would be
nice to at least have this area remain what it was intended to be…a preserve. Thank you
I understand that growth is inevitable, but we need to be smart about it. There needs to be a balance of large
homes, apartments, and smaller homes. There have been hundreds of apartment spaces built west of this area
and the increase in traffic has been considerable in the past 5 years. I urge the council to consider keeping this
balance on the north end of the city.
I use the area all the time for hike, bike and great out doors
I use the area weekly running and hiking. It is a beautiful diverse area with wildlife and plant life. Also concerning
is water shortages. The area needs to be preserved.
I use this area for cycling and running. Additional congestion will make it unsafe for these activities. We are
losing more and more areas where it is safe for recreation. The preserve provides safe space for recreation and
adds value in its current state to the residents of the Phoenix metro area.
I very much enjoy the drive through there. Traffic has already increased too much as it is.
I want to continue enjoying walking and biking along the Sonora Desert preserve in a pleasant and safe way.
I want to keep it as is so that we all can enjoy the area and keep the daily traffic down.
I wish to preserve the Sonara Preserve as it is and prevent the reckless encroachment by developers to rob the
community of this precious resource we all enjoy.
I would like to preserve what we have in our area and community!!
I'm mountain bike in the Sonoran preserve 3 to 4 times per week and feel it is vitally important to keep some
space set aside with minimal traffic and housing.
It is a beautiful community! I love seeing people rude their bikes, walk, hike, ride atvs so close by but with more
housing it becomes impossible to enjoy the preserve. Save the last piece of Arizona the beautiful desert and wild
life in Phoenix!
It is important that we preserve our land to make it available to enjoy the outside life without the traffic.
It is my training ground. I spend countless hours a week there riding in the bike lane, running on designated
sidewalks & trails. It is regarded, by local athletes, as a safe stretch of road to cycle on due to the generous bike
lane and limited traffic entering/exiting Sonoran Desert Dr.
It’s nature. Beautiful parts of the valley have already been ruined by housing projects. This shouldn’t be another
I've lived in this area for the last 3+ years and a major reason we moved here is because of the desert setting
and because it didn't feel as crowded as other parts of the Valley. Sad to see our beautiful preserve turned into
crappy track homes.
Keep the beauty of the desert and keep traffic minimal on Sonoran Desert Drive as there are no crossroads to
take as an alternate route if traffic is heavy on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Keep the desert!!! One of the reasons why I love where I live is the Sonoran preserve!!!!
Page 1294
Keeping natural habitats for the animals that belong here. We are on their land and need to be cognizant of
that. Also, future generations need to be able to enjoy nature as it is meant to be.
Keeping the natural desert habitat is better for the environment.
Leave the desert un touched
Living in the area I regularly hike and bike in the preserve with my family and do not want to see it get overrun
with more housing developments. Additionally Dove Valley is already very congested, I want to preserve our
desert, Phoenix in general has a water issue, and most importantly the schools in this area are already over
My family and I value the Sonoran Preserve and open desert. We've lived next to and used the Sonoran
Preserve for over 15 years. We mountain bike, run, hike, and enjoy nature on these trails multiple times per
week. The surrounding open desert is an integral element contributing to the peace of the Preserve. We were
dismayed at the building of the neighborhood off Dove Valley Rd between the two sections of the Preserve a
few years ago. Please do not crowd the area surrounding and within the beautiful Preserve!
Original safeguards put in place by longtime developers who created the Preserve and associated housing
(Sunbelt Construction). They balanced the housing needs with need to create liveable areas that honored the
fragile desert. This request for increased density is about money and is unnecessary for a profitable develoment
effort. Everyone needs to get paid for their work, including developers, but respect for the fragile ecosystem
and desired lifestyle in the north valley is also required. Profits are fine and were factored into the original deal.
People already speed like crazy on this road and I'm afraid accidents will go up
Please don’t let greedy developers have their way!
Please preserve the natural beauty of the Sonoran Desert. It is irreplaceable!! The proposed excessive
development will permanently destroy the beauty of this desert!!
Please stop encouraging overgrowth. We do not have sufficient resources for the population growth. Let the
desert live. There should not be such things as zoning changes that crowd people and houses into areas to allow
developers to make money and walk away.
Please! We must protect our desert land. For the animals, the plantation, the beauty.
Preserve‐ should be just that preserve. Preserve the natural Sonoran desert as much as possible. This
development would not only take away so much of our desert beauty but also the wildlife habitats & wildlife
would be greatly affected.
Preserving more of the natural landscape is important. The Apache wash recreation area is a beautiful way to
experience nature and enjoy the area. More homes bring more cars and traffic and noise pollution, disturbing
the natural habitat. There are so few places left to enjoy nature and leave it beautiful. We don’t need more
homes there.
Preserving natural areas and wildlife
Proposed area would block the migration of wildlife through the preserve which is likely its originally intended
purpose. Also, there is not enough water already….
Sara Rovarino
Save the preserve
That is a protected place that we need to take care as part of our lungs we need good air, we have so many
houses, why we need to destroy the habitat of a lot of animals.
The beauty of living in Phoenix is having the ability to have open spaces for not only the wildlife but also the
citizens to use the land the way it was intended. There are plenty of other places to build and expand without
overcrowding the desert areas.
The city of Phoenix is running out of desert space because of so many large communities. Taking away the
beautiful desert or desert character overlay to add more concrete and asphalt among houses is deeply
concerning for Phoenicians, tourists, and the wildlife in the area.
The drive through the preserve is truly a beautiful drive. With more houses comes more traffic which will take
away from the beauty and wildlife of the preserve. It is called a preserve for a reason.
Page 1295
The entire N Phoenix area cannot accommodate this influx of new homes without increasing law enforcement
and fixing the road grid. The city needs to be proactive, not reactive.
The natural landscape of the Sonoran Desert must be preserved so that all may enjoy its true beauty and the
rewards of living in the desert. It takes courage and decisive action to prioritize the natural land over
development yet it is a gift you provide to countless generations. Protecting the preserve is action toward a
meaningful legacy. Please honor the desert preserve and say no to more development in this rare and special
area of Phoenix. With hope and gratitude, Krystal Mazzola Wood
The open space is becoming g increasingly scarce, reducing not only the lands for recreation but also the
The Sonoran desert preserve is admired for its standing beauty. Arizona is Home to tons of desert land scenery
that makes our cave creek town so special. Please preserve this land and build soemewhere else
The Sonoran Preserve is truly the most incredible place to hike, bike, and just enjoy the beautiful desert. Just
driving through brings my family so much peace. For it to be surrounded by dense development and traffic
would steal the joy it brings from to the whole community, as well as visitors who are lucky enough to see some
of our most spectacular views.
There has already been enough building along Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert Drive. Please leave the preserve so
that we can continue to enjoy its beauty.
There have been to many accidents and deaths.
This area is vital for wildlife and preserving the bike trails be able to trail ride in the unspoiled desert we don’t
need anymore traffic thru here it would completely ruin the whole area
This desert area is beautiful and with more and more houses being built, this will reduce the amount of natural
preserve we have to enjoy. I love to hike in this area.
This is a great place to hike and enjoy the beautiful desert landscape. The city planners and council are ruining
the desert plus there is no thought of water shortage when these zoning changes are made.
This is a safe place to bike and hike. The balloons are beautiful to watch there. Let’s keep the open space
This is an important area to keep Phoenix as special as it is. In addition, the growing drought crisis makes the
option of further building less eco friendly.
This pristine desert area should not be developed, it needs to be PROTECTED.
This proposed change in zoning will allow new development that will infringe on our recreational area. Zoning is
there for a reason. Please do not change it.
This stretch of road is the safest and most beautiful stretches of uninterrupted roads for cycling in the valley.
Please save it
To be able to get out of the city and experience the peacefulness and beauty of the Sonoran desert so easily is
what makes this area unique. Once it is gone it is gone.
To destroy nature in order to build more homes is wrong. We are speaking for all the animals that currently call
the Sonoran Preserve home.
To preserve the beauty and conservation of the area, as well as safety for cyclist and hikers.
Traffic along Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley is already becoming a major problem. Increased traffic will
make for a dangerous situation for cyclists riding in the bike lanes. Also, the increased density of homes directly
against the road will affect the desert nature of the area.
Upon moving to my home in Sonoran Commons I was told all this state land would stay undeveloped. That was
a key factor in purchasing my home because I love the drive, but most importantly Hiking and biking. It was very
disappointing when the Taylor Morrison community built where I was told no homes would be and increasing
more homes and traffic would be disappointing not to mention destroy the sonoran desert further. Please do
not allow this to happen!
Walking along the Sonora preserve desert in a safe manner is very important for my kids
Page 1296
We are homeowners in Tatum Highlands and use the beautiful Sonoran Desert Drive to get to one of our
favorite hiking areas, Apache Wash Trail. It is vitally important both ecologically and aesthetically to maintain
the Desert Overlay Plan to keep this remarkable Arizona treasure intact with low density, one story, blended
into the environment, natural colors, and with great respect of the surrounding preserve. The developer’s
existing project just to the west on Sonoran Desert Drive is an example of the opposite of this‐ homes close
together, no subtle and natural build character, no boundaries between homes, no blending with the Sonoran
Desert landscape. Sticks out while on the drive or hiking the Preserve rather than disappearing/tastefully
blending in. This is very concerning and must not be duplicated in any way. Please retain the existing Desert
Overlay Plan to maintain the incredible Sonoran Preserve. Thank you Councilman Waring and all city council
members. Respectfully submitted, Laurie Foster
We are loosing preserve land left and right. We need to keep the preserve the way it is. Plus not to mention all
the traffic and extra water for all these new builds.
We are loosing the beauty that was one of the huge reasons for moving where we live. All you are you doing is
bringing more infrastructure. I understand that growth needs to take place but I think that it should be done in a
much better way. Putting up a bunch of houses on top of each other is not the solution. I see greed takes the
upper hand over more intelligent decisions. Thank you
We chose this part of Phoenix when we moved from out of state because of the open desert and what that
offered, little traffic, and less people in general. In just 4 short years we are seeing things change for the
negative…reminding us of overdevelopment we experienced in the East San Francisco Bay Area.
Overdevelopment that led to traffic issues and overcrowded schools, just to name a couple problems. We don’t
want to see these same mistakes take place in our new home. And we don’t want to lose the beautiful open
We have a young family and love to hike which is why we moved to this area. If we don’t stop this, it will
destroy the area and wildlife.
We have already encroached & displaced our very important desert wildlife, my hope is to prevent further
destruction of our desert ecosystem. I enjoy hiking, less pollution, nature and safety within our preserve. Please
keep it that way.
We have so few Desert Lands left for generations to appreciate
We hike and drive through here for mental health. Please don’t fill more desert preserves with homes and
commercial property.
We love the natural area of Sonoran Preserve! Adding more homes is going to take away the beauty of this land.
We cannot allow new developments to destroy our desert.
We moved here to not be so close to continued urbanization. We utilize the preserves regularly for hiking,
biking, and running.
We moved to this area because of the beauty of the preserve and the desert areas around us. The area is
already congested with traffic and adding more subdivisions will just clog our streets, increase pollution,
displace animals and ruin the desert. Please do not let that happen.
We must preserve the natural beauty of Arizona. The generations to come deserve to see the natural beauty
that we have today. It is also home to many of Gods creatures and sustains their lives.
We need to have open space to enjoy hikes, trails, horizon visibility. We do not want the Preserve to turn into a
asphalt map.
We need to stop doing things for the sake of the bottom line. We have destroyed enough of our natural
environment for the sake of exploitation, and disregarding something that has been set in place creates a
precedent for this to continue arbitrarily. People move their families to areas like this because of the
environment around them. If we wanted to live in the middle of the city, we would live in the middle of the city.
Allowing this to continue will greatly reduce and diminish the purpose & meaning of preserved & protected
land, as well as the ability by which we are able to enjoy it in it’s natural form ‐ mitigating the full purpose
Page 1297
We truly need to preserve our Sonoran Desert and we need to maintain the original reason this area has been
preserved. We are rapidly losing our Sonoran Desert and our recreation areas, not to mention our wildlife are
losing their homes. We can’t be nothing but concrete. We should take pride in living in a beautiful part of town.
Please Preserve!!
we use it weekly for hiking and dog walking please please don't ruin this!
We want to preserve the natural beauty and opportunities we have now to bike, hike and pleasant walking with
families and friends while enjoying the beauty of our Sonoran Desert. So please don’t grant permission to build
more housing communities.
When does this stop? We have a responsibility to our next generation of children to save our desert for them to
enjoy. Take the building elsewhere. PRESERVE what is left of our precious desert
Would like this preserved with desert lands as much as possible
Page 1298
Page 1299
Page 1300
(Verdin PUD) - Southwest corner of the 24th Street Alignment and Sonoran
Desert Drive (Ordinance G-6991)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-62-18-
2 and rezone the site from S-1 DCOD (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District), S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District), and RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character Overlay District) to PUD DCOD
(Pending PUD) (Planned Unit Development, Desert Character Overlay District,
pending Planned Unit Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow
single-family residential. This is a companion case to GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2,
and Z-TA-5-18-2 and must be heard following Z-TA-5-18-2.
Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 DCOD (144.82 acres), S-1 (333.57 acres), RE-35 DCOD (10.24
acres)
Proposed Zoning: PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 acres) and PUD (333.57 acres)
Acreage: 488.63 acres
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow single family residential
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant: Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 6,
2018, Apr. 2, 2019, and Dec. 7, 2021, for information only. The North Gateway Village
Planning Committee heard this case on Nov. 8, 2018 and Dec. 9, 2021, for information
only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on March
10, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with a modified
stipulation, by a vote of 4-1. The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this
case on April 5, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with
Page 910
modifications and additional stipulations, by a vote of 10-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on May 5, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the staff memo dated May 5, 2022, by a vote of 7-1.
Location
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive.
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 28239 N. 23rd St.; and 28231, 28235, 28241, and 28245 N. 24th St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 911
To: Alan Stephenson Date: June 28, 2022
Deputy City Manager
Planning and Development Director
From: Joshua Bednarek
Planning and Development Deputy Director
Subject: ITEM 171 ON THE JULY 1, 2022 PUBLIC HEARING/FORMAL AGENDA –
REZONING APPLICATION Z-62-18-2 – SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 24TH
STREET ALIGNMENT AND SONORAN DESERT DRIVE (ORDINANCE G-6991)
Item 171, Rezoning Application Z-62-18-2 (Verdin PUD) is a request to rezone 488.63
acres located at the southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert
Drive from S-1 DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD to allow single-family residential
(Ordinance G-6991).
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard the case on March 10, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with a modification by a vote of 4-1.
The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard the case on April 5, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with modifications and additional
stipulations by a vote of 10-1.
The Planning Commission heard the case on May 5, 2022 and recommended approval
per a staff memo by a vote of 7-1. One of the stipulations required the execution of a
development agreement between the city and the developer within 24 months of City
Council approval of this change of zone and prior to final site plan approval and issuance
of any grading and drainage permits. The development agreement is to outline the
requirements for initial improvements to Sonoran Desert Drive, as well as financial
contributions for the ultimate buildout of Sonoran Desert Drive.
On July 1, 2022, the City Council continued this rezoning request, along with three other
related cases, in order to allow additional time to finalize the site-specific development
agreement and to finalize the north area Sonoran Desert Drive Funding Policy for the City
Council to adopt concurrently with the site specific planning and zoning items.
After the continuance recommendation, the City of Phoenix declared a Stage 1 Water Alert
and the applicant agreed to incorporate drought management commitments into the PUD
Development Narrative (see the attached Verdin Drought Management Commitment).
Below are the modified stipulations that will add language regarding water conservation
and sustainability measures for the development.
Additionally, the representative for this rezoning request has been working with the
community and is requesting to add a new stipulation and modify stipulations to address
their commitment to build one-story homes along the east and north portions of the site
and to increase the open space tract along the eastern boundary of the site. The
stipulations below reflect the representative’s commitments. The legislative edits with
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
CAPS and strike-throughs illustrate changes made at the village and Planning
Commission levels. All added and modified stipulations, since the Planning Commission
recommendation, are in bold font below.
Staff recommends approval, subject to the following stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with
the Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3,
2022, as modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES
6, 8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
DENSITY TO 2.6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6,
8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
NUMBER OF UNITS TO 1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY
TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH
CORRIDOR. THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A
CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA
WITH PLANT MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST:
GREEN LIST. PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, AND
136: REMOVE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL – SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT
COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL
SHALL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO
THE WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED
PLANT PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123,
SECTION 9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD
LANGUAGE REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
ACRES ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A
PROVISION FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE
DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN
SPACE.
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO
PATHS, PER STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL
SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL
ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
dh. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT
DENSITY THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS
FOR THE ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT
REFERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN
SECTION 4.C. (REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE
DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM
UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGES 37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: MODIFY FOOTNOTE 6 TO ALSO LIMIT THE
BUILDING HEIGHT FOR HOMES BUILT ON THE FIRST ROW OF
RESIDENTIAL LOTS ALONG THE EASTERN AND NORTHERN SITE
BOUNDARIES TO ONE-STORY WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24-
FEET MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF PARAPET OR THE TOP OF
THE RIDGE ON SLOPING ROOFS.
kl. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT
PROHIBITED BY CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY
ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE
ALLOWED…”
lm. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.3.A: ADD THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE
UNDER THE EXISTING SENTENCE: “ANY WALLS OR FENCING
ALONG A PRESERVE EDGE/MCFCD PROPERTY BOUNDARY,
OTHER THAN WALLS OR FENCING FOR INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL
LOTS, SHALL BE COMPRISED OF THE BARRIER FENCING TYPE,
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
WHICH ARE DESIGNED WITH SUFFICIENT OPENINGS TO ALLOW
THE REGULAR PASSAGE OF WILDLIFE.”
mn. PAGE 42, SECTION 6.3.B: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO ‘A
MAXIMUM 6-FOOT, 4-INCH HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING” TO ‘A
MAXIMUM 5-FOOT HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING’.
no. PAGE 46, SECTION 6.6: CHANGE ‘14 FEET’ TO ‘12 FEET’.
lop. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC
TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE
THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT
PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR
VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO
THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
q. PAGE 70, SECTION 4.D: AFTER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH ADD
LANGUAGE REGARDING COMMON AREA LANDSCAPING
STANDARDS TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
• PROHIBIT NON-FUNCTIONAL TURF AND INCLUDE AN
EXPLANATION OF WHAT NON-FUNCTIONAL TURF IS.
• PROHIBITING TURF WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR AND CAVE CREEK WASH EDGES.
• TURF, WHERE ALLOWED, WILL NOT BE PLANNED ON
SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 5%.
• REGULAR WATER LEAK DETECTION AUDITS WILL TAKE
PLACE FOR COMMON AREAS MANAGED AND MAINTAINED
BY THE HOA.
r. PAGE 75-76: ADD A SUBSECTION REGARDING REAR YARD TURF
AND INCLUDE LANGUAGE RESTRICTING TURF IN THE REAR
YARD TO A MAXIMUM 20%.
ps. PAGE 79-80, SECTION 5.A, LAST BULLET POINT: ADD THE
FOLLOWING AFTER THE FIRST SENTENCE: “THE USE OF
RETAINING WALLS IN EXCESS OF 4 FEET IS DISCOURAGED AND
SHOULD BE LIMITED TO LOCATIONS WHERE NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE SPECIFIC SITE TOPOGRAPHY.”
mq PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS –
t. DESERT WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO
THE YELLOW LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
nr PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
u. NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND
ADD IT TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
v. PAGE 98, NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION COLLABORATION
GOALS: ADD A GOAL REGARDING SUBSTANTIAL WATER
CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT COMMITMENTS.
os PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT.
w. UPDATE THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE MINIMUM 25-FOOT,
AVERAGE 50-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE
PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS A
CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA AND
MAY INCLUDE LIMITED TRAILHEAD AND TRAIL OR PATHWAY
IMPROVEMENTS, BARRIER FENCING AND RETENTION AREAS
FOR THE PROJECT.
pt PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
x. STATING THAT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT, AVERAGE 50-FOOT OPEN
SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE
CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR AND THAT THE OPEN SPACE
TRACT WILL BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE TOTAL OPEN SPACE
REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. EXPLAIN THAT THE AREA’S
PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT PALETTE GREEN
LIST.
qu PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
y. MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
AND INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON
PAGE 121.
rv PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
z. MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
INFORMATION REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF
HACKBERRY” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST ON
PAGE 119.
sw PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM
aa. HEIGHT FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING
AND COPY IS 16 FEET…”
bb. PAGES 125-126, SECTION 11. SUSTAINABILITY: ADD LANGUAGE
REGARDING REGULAR WATER LEAK DETECTION AUDITS FOR
COMMON AREAS MANAGED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOA.
cc. PAGES 125-126, SECTION 11. SUSTAINABILITY: ADD LANGUAGE
TO REQUIRE EFFLUENT DELIVERY BACK TO THE CITY.
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
m. PAGES 126-127, SECTION 12. WATER: ADD LANGUAGE
REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN THE CITY’S HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION WATER EFFICIENCY PROGRAM.
ee. PAGES 126-127, SECTION 12. WATER: ADD LANGUAGE
REGARDING THE EPA WATERSENSE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
AND MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS. THIS SHOULD INCLUDE BUT
IS NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: LEAK DETECTION AUDITS;
WATERSENSE LABELED TOILETS, BATHROOM FAUCETS, AND
SHOWERHEADS; WATERSENSE LABELED IRRIGATION SYSTEM
COMPONENTS; LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPLETED BY A
WATERSENSE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL; AND FORMAL
CERTIFICATION AS A WATERSENSE HOME BY AN AUTHORIZED
HOME CERTIFYING ORGANIZATION.
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified
by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT
NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED
BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL
DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS
AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE
EROSION HAZARD SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH
CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION
IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH
TIMING OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY
THE DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
9. Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.
13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BY
EMAIL A MINIMUM OF 15 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
REVIEW MEETINGS WITH THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Z-62-18-2 Backup Memo
June 28, 2022
DEPARTMENT, PLANNING HEARING OFFICER REQUESTS TO MODIFY
STIPULATIONS, OR ANY ZONING ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS. THE
NOTICE SHALL INCLUDE THE DATE, TIME AND LOCATION OF THE
MEETING/HEARING.
A. DR. GARY KIRKILAS: GARYKIRKILAS@GMAIL.COM
B. MEMBERS OF THE PHOENIX SONORAN PRESERVE AND
MOUNTAIN PARKS/PRESERVES COMMITTEE
C. VASHTI “TICE” SUPPLEE: VSUPPLEE25@GMAIL.COM
14. APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE
CONDITIONED UPON THE FINAL EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER WITHIN 24
MONTHS OF CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE OF
ZONE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE
EXECUTED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF
ANY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS. THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT SHALL AT A MINIMUM OUTLINE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
INITIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS WELL AS
FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ULTIMATE BUILDOUT OF
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTS.
Enclosures:
Verdin Drought Management Commitment
Approved: _____________________________________________
Alan Stephenson
Deputy City Manager/Planning and Development Director
DROUGHT MANAGEMENT Commitments
In June 2022, the City of Phoenix declared a Stage 1 Water Alert, which sets in motion an intensive
public education and information program centered around water conservation, sustainability and
management. A Stage 2 Water Warning is expected to be declared yet this year and will provide
authority for the City to impose water use reduction regulations.
Taylor Morrison’s proposed Verdin master planned community in North Phoenix has been designed
around a framework that makes Verdin a natural partner and model for the City with regard to
sustainable water conservation practices. As the City navigates a path to facilitate and support much
needed housing while also advancing the City’s drought management and water conservation goals,
Taylor Morrison’s Verdin community will establish a new standard for ‘water forward’ development
in North Phoenix.
Taylor Morrison has committed to the following water conservation and sustainability measures for
Verdin that will be regulated through the Verdin Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) and private
governance documents.
1. EPA WaterSense Certification. All homes within the Verdin community will be designed and
certified through the EPA WaterSense Certification program. Homes within Verdin will meet the
mandatory requirements for WaterSense labeling, including:
• Leak detection audits
• WaterSense labeled toilets, bathroom faucets and showerheads
• WaterSense labeled irrigation system components
• Landscape design completed by a WaterSense design professional
• Formal certification as a WaterSense home by an authorized Home Certifying
Organization
2. City of Phoenix Homeowners Association Water Efficiency Program. The homeowner’s
association for Verdin will participate in the City’s Homeowners Association Water Efficiency
Program.
3. National Wildlife Federation Certification. The Verdin community has been designed, from
the ground up, to achieve National Wildlife Federation (“NWF”) Certification for the community,
including that community common areas and open spaces will achieve Certified Wildlife Habitat
status. The NWF Certification, naturally, includes substantial water conservation and
management commitments that are embedded in the Verdin PUD zoning regulations.
4. Native Drought Tolerant Vegetation/Xeriscape Plans. The Verdin PUD contains a curated,
localized water-wise Sonoran Desert Plant Palette for use throughout the entire community,
created in partnership with local stakeholders and the National Wildlife Federation.
• Ultimately, more than 100 acres of preserved and revegetated common area open spaces
(21% of the project land area) will be protected habitats with native vegetation.
Verdin Water Commitments 6-21-22 1
• Landscaping in the front yards of all homes will be required to utilize the drought tolerant,
NWF Certified Verdin plant palette.
5. Irrigation Restrictions. The Verdin PUD includes design guidelines for undisturbed and
revegetated open space areas that call for restrictions on irrigation, limited maintenance,
prohibition on pesticides or herbicides, and restrictions on pruning. Over the long term, 75% of
the Verdin community common areas will be prohibited from having irrigation.
• Designated Preserved Open Areas (39.8 acres) will be preserved in a natural state with an
absolute prohibition on irrigation.
• Designated Revegetated Open Space Areas (63.3 acres) will be minimally irrigated to
establish revegetated plants, but then cut off from irrigation once plant materials are
established.
6. Irrigation and Use of Smart Controllers.
• Community common areas that are irrigated will be required to utilize smart irrigation
controllers that can be controlled remotely to promote water conservation.
• Automatic drip irrigation systems are required for all front yard landscaping.
• Automatic irrigation systems designed by a landscape architect or other similar certified
designer shall be required for all planting areas in front yards and common areas. Fixed
risers in such areas are prohibited.
• Areas requiring overhead spray shall be limited to turf areas and flower beds. All other
areas must use drip irrigation.
• Large overhead and drip irrigation systems should be zoned for exposure, topography
and varying water requirements of the plant material.
7. Water Leak Detection. Verdin common areas managed and maintained by the homeowner’s
association will undergo regular water leak detection audits to ensure the integrity and efficiency
of the irrigation system is maintained.
8. Turf Restrictions. The Verdin PUD contains turf restriction prohibitions that advance water
conservation goals and are a required element of the NWF Partnership.
• Turf is prohibited in all medians and public rights of way.
• Turf is prohibited within common areas adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve, community
edges and along wash corridors.
• Turf is prohibited within the front yards of all homes within Verdin. This restriction will be
enforced through the community design guidelines and CC&Rs.
• “Non-functional” turf is not allowed within the Verdin community.
• Turf within rear yards of all homes will be restricted such that no more than 20% of a
private lot rear yard could contain natural turf.
• Turf, where allowed, will not be planted on slopes in excess of 5%.
8. Effluent Reuse. All effluent generated from Verdin will be delivered back to the City for City use
through the Water Services Department sewer system.
Verdin Water Commitments 6-21-22 2
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-62-18-2) FROM S-1 DCOD (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT CHARACTER OVERLAY
DISTRICT), S-1 (RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT), AND
RE-35 DCOD (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT, DESERT
CHARACTER OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 488.63-acre site located at the southwest
corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive in a portion of Sections 22
and 27, Township 5 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is
hereby changed from 144.82 acres of “S-1 DCOD” (Ranch or Farm Residence District,
Desert Character Overlay District), 333.57 acres of “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence
District), and 10.24 acres of “RE-35 DCOD” (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District) to “PUD” (Planned Unit Development).
Page 912
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Verdin PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this
request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped March 3, 2022, as modified by the
following stipulations:
a. Pages 6, 8, 26, and 28: Revise all references to the maximum density to
2.6 dwelling units per acre.
b. Pages 6, 8, 26, and 28: Revise all references to the maximum number
of units to 1,250 dwelling units.
c. Pages 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, and 136: Remove all
references to the “Single-Family Residential – Small Lot (SFR-3)” land
use district. Unit counts and percentages related to this removal shall be
updated accordingly.
d. Pages 20, 52, 61, 102, and 113: Revise all references to the width of the
multi-use trail easement along the Mesquite Wash corridor to 30-feet-
wide.
e. Pages 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, and 121: Revise all references to the “Approved Plant Palette” to
“Plant Palette”.
f. Pages 8-22, Section 2. Land Use Plan, and pages 97-123, Section 9.
Certified Open Space Design Guidelines: Add language regarding
conveyance of approximately 16 acres addressed in Stipulation No. 8.
There shall be a provision for both on site open space and the dedicated
16 acres to count towards total open space.
g. Page 16, Off-Site Connectivity: Add language regarding public trail
access easements provided for the Mesquite Wash corridor trail and
Page 913
community paseo paths, per Stipulation No. 6. The section shall
specifically note that the access easements will ensure permanent
public access and restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access through
the residential community to the Sonoran Preserve.
h. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. Page 35, Single-Family Land Use District Development Standards
Table: Add a row after Max. Dwelling Unit Density that reads “Maximum
Units: 1,250 dwelling units for the entire PUD area”.
j. Pages 36-37, Single-Family Land Use District Development Standards
Table: Add a footnote that refers to the development parcel allocation
table in Section 4.c. (Regulatory Standards & Land Use Districts –
Development Standards) for the maximum unit counts for each
development parcel.
k. Page 41, Section 6.1: Revise to read, “When not prohibited by City
Code, Section 31-13, primary ornamental entries no higher than 16-feet
are allowed…”
l. Page 41, Section 6.3.a: Add the following sentence under the existing
sentence: “Any walls or fencing along a preserve edge/MCFCD property
boundary, other than walls or fencing for individual residential lots, shall
be comprised of the barrier fencing type, which are designed with
sufficient openings to allow the regular passage of wildlife.”
m. Page 42, Section 6.3.B: Revise the reference to ‘a maximum 6-foot, 4-
inch high full view fencing” to ‘a maximum 5-foot high full view fencing’.
n. Page 46, Section 6.6: Change ‘14 feet’ to ‘12 feet’.
o. Pages 52-53, Section 2.C: Add language regarding public trail access
easements provided for the Mesquite Wash corridor trail and community
paseo paths, per Stipulation No. 6. The section should specifically note
that the access easements will ensure permanent public access and
restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access through the residential
community to the Sonoran Preserve.
p. Page 79-80, Section 5.A, Last bullet point: Add the following after the
first sentence: “The use of retaining walls in excess of 4 feet is
discouraged and should be limited to locations where necessary to
accommodate specific site topography.”
q. Pages 90-91, Section 6.H: Delete “Chilopsis Linearis – Desert Willow”
tree from the Green List and add it to the Yellow List trees on page 91.
Page 914
r. Pages 90 and 92, Section 6.H: Delete “Celtis Reticulata – Netleaf
Hackberry” shrub from the Yellow List and add it to the Green List
shrubs on page 90.
s. Page 101, Certified Area Open Space Types Exhibit: Update the exhibit
to include the 25-foot open space tract that will be provided along the
eastern boundary of the site as a certified area Type “B” – natural
revegetated area.
t. Page 105-108, Section 1.D.2: Add language regarding the minimum 25-
foot open space tract that will be provided along the eastern boundary of
the site to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor. Explain
that the area’s plant material will be from the Plant Palette Green List.
u. Pages 119 and 121, 1.E. Plant and Wildlife Relationship Matrix, Plant
Palette: Green List: Remove the image and information regarding
“Chilopsis Linearis – Desert Willow” and add to the Plant Palette: Yellow
List on page 121.
v. Pages 119 and 122, 1.E. Plant and Wildlife Relationship Matrix, Plant
Palette: Yellow List: Remove the image information regarding “Celtis
Reticulata – Netleaf Hackberry” and add to the Plant Palette: Green List
on page 119.
w. Page 123, Section 10.1.B: Revise to read, “The maximum height for
primary ornamental entry sign lettering and copy is 16 feet…”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified
by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
Page 915
6. The developer shall provide public trail access easements for the Mesquite
Wash corridor trail and community paseo paths that provide connection to the
Sonoran Preserve as depicted on Exhibit 6, Pedestrian Circulation Plan, in the
development narrative, as modified and approved by the Parks and Recreation
Department and Planning and Development Department. The public access
shall be designed to restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access, as approved
by the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and Development
Department. The location and design of trail connections shall be coordinated
with the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and Development
Department.
7. A minimum 12-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be constructed within a 30-
foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the Mesquite Wash in
accordance with Section 429 of the City of Phoenix MAG supplemental detail,
as modified to address wash corridor constraints and approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
8. The developer shall convey approximately 16 acres located at the southeast
corner of the site within the erosion hazard setback area along the Cave Creek
Wash corridor, as generally shown on Exhibit 11 of the development narrative,
to the City of Phoenix for inclusion in the Sonoran Preserve, as modified and
approved by the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and
Development Department. The final acreage and configuration of the property
to be conveyed, along with timing of the conveyance, shall be mutually agreed
upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department, and Planning
and Development Department.
9. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
Page 916
13. The developer shall notify the following individuals by email a minimum of 15
days prior to any preliminary site plan review meetings with the Planning and
Development Department, Planning Hearing Officer requests to modify
stipulations, or any zoning adjustment requests. The notice shall include the
date, time and location of the meeting/hearing.
a. Dr. Gary Kirkilas: garykirkilas@gmail.com
b. Members of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Mountain
Parks/Preserves Committee
c Vashti “Tice” Supplee: vsupplee25@gmail.com
14. Approval of the Planned Unit Development shall be conditioned upon the final
execution of a development agreement between the City and the developer
within 24 months of City Council approval of this change of zone. Additionally,
the development agreement shall be executed prior to final site plan approval
and issuance of any grading and drainage permits. The development
agreement shall at a minimum outline the requirements for initial improvements
to Sonoran Desert Drive, as well as financial contributions for the ultimate
buildout of Sonoran Desert Drive, as modified and approved by the Street
Transportation and Planning and Development departments.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 1st day of June, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
Page 917
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 918
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-62-18-2
PARCEL NO. 1:
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 3
EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 3
EAST, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22;
THENCE NORTH 00° 20' 16" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION
22, A DISTANCE OF 2,501.66 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 90° 00' 00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,642.12 FEET TO THE
NORTH-SOUTH MID-SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 22;
THENCE NORTH 00° 28' 49" EAST, ALONG SAID MID-SECTION LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 141.23 FEET TO THE EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE OF SAID
SECTION 22;
THENCE NORTH 89° 48' 35" EAST, ALONG SAID MID-SECTION, LINE A
DISTANCE OF 2,641.83 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 22;
THENCE SOUTH 00° 20' 16" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION
22, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NO. 2:
THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF
THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA;
EXCEPT ALL THE COAL AND OTHER MINERALS, AS RESERVED IN THE
PATENT. (AFFECTS THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
27).
EXCEPT ALL MINERALS IN SAID LAND AS RESERVED TO THE UNITED
STATES IN PATENT; AND
EXCEPTING ALL URANIUM, THORIUM, OR OTHER MATERIAL WHICH IS OR
MAY BE DETERMINED TO BE PECULIARLY ESSENTIAL TO THE PRODUCTION
Page 919
OF FISSIONABLE MATERIALS, WHETHER OR NOT OF COMMERCIAL VALUE
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF AUGUST 1, 1946 (60 STAT.
755), AS SET FORTH IN THE PATENT ON SAID LAND. (AFFECTS THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2).
Page 920
Page 921
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-62-18-2
Verdin PUD
March 9, 2022
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 5, 2022
Request From: S-1 DCOD (144.82 acres), S-1 (333.57 acres),
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To: PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 acres),
PUD (333.57 acres)
Proposed Use: Planned Unit Development to allow single-
family residential
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
Current: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units
per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5
dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain,
General Plan Land Use Map
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Designation
Proposed (GPA-DSTV-1-18-2): Residential 2 to
3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain,
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal
Page 922
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Street Map Sonoran Desert
Major Arterial 80-foot south half street
Classification Drive
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The proposed development creates a residential community at a density of 3.0 dwelling
units per acre. The site will incorporate open edge treatments, various open space
areas, and connectivity to the surrounding Sonoran Preserve areas. The protection of
native vegetation and character of the area is consistent with the North Land Use Plan
and the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, which both emphasize preservation of desert
character.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of housing
types and densities where appropriate within each village that support a broad
range of lifestyles.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment and concurrent rezoning case
will allow for single-family residential development options adjacent to a major arterial
street and in close proximity to the North Gateway Core and Cave Creek Road. The
various lot sizes and single-family housing products proposed in the development will
support a range of lifestyles for Phoenix residents.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES & SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposed PUD narrative includes standards for desert-appropriate vegetation and
trees strategically located to provide shade and visual enhancement throughout the
community. The PUD has also fostered a collaboration with the National Wildlife
Federation to establish design guidelines to integrate and preserve plantings and
existing trees in the development. The landscaping standards in the PUD will provide
significant shade for pedestrians and will help reduce the urban heat island effect within
the development and in the greater Desert View area.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
North Land Use Plan: See Background Item No. 4.
Page 923
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 15.
Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 16.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 17.
Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 18.
Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 19.
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant S-1, S-1 DCOD, RE-35 DCOD
North (Across
Phoenix Sonoran
Sonoran Desert RE-35 DCOD
Preserve
Drive)
Vacant, Phoenix
West RE-35, S-1
Sonoran Preserve
Cave Creek Wash,
East Vacant (State Trust RE-35
Land)
Phoenix Sonoran
South RE-35
Preserve
Page 924
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Background/Issues/Analysis
REQUEST
1. This is a request to rezone
a 488.63-gross acre site
located at the southwest
corner of the 24th Street
alignment and Sonoran
Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD (Ranch or Farm
Proposed
Residence, Desert
Character Overlay District), PUD
S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence), RE-35 DCOD
(Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character
Overlay District) to PUD
(Planned Unit
Development) to allow a Zoning Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix
single-family residential Planning and Development Department
development, not to
exceed 1,420 units.
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
2. The site has General Plan Land Use Map designations of Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre /
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres), Preserves /
Floodplain (23.24 acres), Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres). The
proposal is not consistent with these designations and, as the site exceeds 10
acres in size, the applicant has filed a General Plan Amendment, GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2, as a companion case to this rezoning request. The GPA request is for
Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre (451.13 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres), Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay removal (474.37 acres). Staff is recommending approval as
the designation will allow development at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per
acre.
Page 925
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
EXISTING PROPOSED
Existing and Proposed General Land Use Designation Maps, Source: City of Phoenix
Planning and Development Department
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is designated Future
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre.
The area directly east of the subject site is designated Preserves/Floodplain.
South of the subject site is designated Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Publicly Owned
Parks/Open Space.
West of the subject site is designated Publicly Owned Parks/Open Space and
open space owned by the ASLD designated Future Parks/Open Space or 1
dwelling unit per acre.
Page 926
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
EXISTING CONDITIONS & SURROUNDING ZONING
3. The subject site is currently vacant and zoned S-1 DCOD (Ranch or Farm
Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence),
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character Overlay
District). The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
Aerial Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
NORTH
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is Sonoran Desert Drive and
the Sonoran Preserve. Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a major arterial
roadway and is an important east-west alignment between Interstate 17 and
northeast Phoenix. This roadway alignment is proposed to have a total of six
lanes, three in each direction. The Sonoran Preserve consists of over 9,600
acres of relatively undisturbed natural areas in North Phoenix with various trail
connectivity throughout. Additionally, this area is owned by the Arizona State
Land Department (ASLD).
EAST
East of the subject site is Cave Creek Wash and its associated floodplain. The
floodplain also encroaches onto the southeast portion of the subject site.
Page 927
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
SOUTH
South of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation
Area. The Cave Buttes Recreation Area is a park that overseen by the
Maricopa County Flood Control District. This area contains a number of dams
that control flooding from washes in the general area.
WEST
West of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve owned by the City of Phoenix
and vacant land owned by the ASLD.
AREA PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITATIVES
4. North Land Use Plan
The project site is
located within the
boundaries of the North
Land Use Plan. The
North Land Use Plan
was created in 1997 with
Subject Site
the purpose of
establishing growth
patterns while
preserving the desert
landscape and character
of the area. The plan
recognizes the
importance that the rural
character and lifestyle
play in determining
appropriate land use
densities. North Land Use Plan Map, Source: City of Phoenix
The northern portion of Planning and Development Department
the site is within the
North Land Use Plan
and the plan designates that area as 0 to 1.2 dwelling units per acre. The
proposed site will have a maximum of 1,420 units across the approximately 488-
acre site to ensure compatibility with the character of the North Land Use Plan.
The development also supports concepts in the North Land Use Plan by
preserving Cave Creek Wash’s natural flow and leaving that portion of the site
as natural open space. Additionally, the development will provide open edge
treatments adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and blend the development edges
with the surrounding desert environment.
Page 928
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
PUD PROPOSAL
5. The proposal was developed utilizing the Planned Unit Development zoning
district. The PUD is intended to create a built environment that is superior to
what is produced through conventional zoning districts and design guidelines.
Using a collaborative and comprehensive approach, an applicant authors and
proposes standards and guidelines that are tailored to the context of a site on a
case by case basis. Where the PUD Development Narrative is silent on a
requirement, the applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions will be applied.
6. Land Use Plan: The PUD will
be a master-planned residential
community with a maximum of
1,420 dwelling units at an
overall density of 3.0 dwelling
units per acre. The
development will be a collection
of single-family neighborhoods
with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian
network connected to the
Sonoran Preserve and
surrounding desert environment.
The development will be divided
into three Master Development
Parcels ranging from
Conceptual Land Use Plan, Source: Gammage &
approximately 130 to 180 acres. Burnham
Each development parcel
represents an anticipated
development phase. The
development parcels will then
be divided into individual
residential neighborhood units,
which will range from 20 to 40
acres in size. Each
neighborhood unit will include a
mix of lot sizes, densities, and
home product types.
Master Development Parcel Exhibit, Source:
Gammage & Burnham
Page 929
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
7. Permitted Uses: The PUD proposes to allow single-family detached dwellings,
single-family attached dwellings, guesthouses, a community center, and model
homes by right. The primary uses for the community center are a place of
meeting, social activities, active or passive indoor and outdoor recreation and
entertainment, indoor and outdoor cooking areas and facilities, and a business
center. Accessory uses to the community center include alcoholic beverage or
food sales, convenience market, and snack bar/restaurant. Temporary uses to
the community center are community or special events, promotional events,
farmers markets, and mobile food vending and vendors, subject to Section 708
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Accessory uses and structures are to comply
with its respective section in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
8. Development Standards: The PUD sets forth several development standards
that only apply to the non-hillside areas of the PUD. All other areas of the PUD
will be subject to all Hillside Development Standards of the Zoning Ordinance,
which would override any of the PUD standards where conflicts arise.
Below is a summary of the development standards proposed in the PUD
development narrative for development parcel allocation and single-family land
use districts, which can be found on pages 28, 35, and 36 of the PUD
Development Narrative.
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION
Master
Master Maximum
Development Maximum
Development Allowed Land Use Districts Allowed
Parcel Unit Count
Parcel Percentage
Acreage
Small Lot (SFR-3) 25%
A 154 +/- 550 Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 75%
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 50%
Small Lot (SFR-3) 25%
B 168 +/- 600 Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 75%
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 50%
Small Lot (SFR-3) 25%
C 166 +/- 600 Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 75%
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 50%
Total Gross
488 +/-
Acreage
Maximum Overall Unit Count 1,420
Maximum Overall Density 3.0 du/ac
Page 930
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development
SFR-3 SFR-5 SFR-7 SFR-9 SFR-14
Standard
Minimum Lot
Area (square 3,000 5,000 7,000 9,000 14,000
feet)
Minimum Lot
40 feet 45 feet 55 feet 65 feet 90 feet
Width
Minimum Lot
None
Depth
Minimum Perimeter Building Setbacks
Sonoran
Desert 15 feet
Drive
Collector
15 feet
ROW
Minimum Interior Building Setbacks
Front 10 feet
Garage 18 feet, from back of sidewalk
Rear 5 feet 15 feet 20 feet
Street Side 5 feet 10 feet
0 feet, 10
Non-Street foot
5 feet
Side building
separation
Maximum
2 stories, 30 feet
Building Height
The proposed development standards allow for various types of residential
development throughout the community to ensure diversity and a variety of
lifestyle choices for residents.
9. Connectivity to the Sonoran Preserve: The Verdin development will provide
proximity and access to significant desert amenities, such as the Sonoran
Preserve, through trail connections, paseos, edge open space areas, and view
corridors. The PUD also provides various design guidelines and development
standards ensuring the project will integrate naturally with the surrounding
desert environment.
The property is adjacent to properties that are part of or targeted for acquisition
as part of the Sonoran Preserve. The developer and the City of Phoenix’s
Parks and Recreation Department intend to ensure opportunities for public
access to the Preserve. The development will provide public walk-in trailheads
and connections at various locations along the Preserve edge and Verdin’s
property boundaries. The final locations will be determined by the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Page 931
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Additionally, a public trail will be
developed along the Mesquite Wash
Corridor, linking the north and south
halves of the Sonoran Preserve. At
the north and south ends of the
Mesquite Wash Corridor, the PUD
will provide public trailheads at
defined points of entry. The
Mesquite Wash Corridor trail will
include a 12-foot-wide natural
surface multi-use trail within a 20-
foot-wide public multi-use trail
easement. Conceptual Trailhead Example, Source:
Gammage & Burnham
Internal to the development there
will be minimum 40-foot-wide
landscaped pedestrian paseo corridors with 6 to 8 foot wide paths located
between neighborhood units. The Paseo Corridors will extend from the internal
pedestrian circulation system to the aforestated trailheads.
Trails will be provided in limited areas near the property perimeter where future
connections to the Sonoran Preserve are anticipated. These trails will be
comprised of a natural surface no greater than 4 feet in width. The final
locations of the connection points will be determined in coordination with the
Parks and Recreation Department.
Per the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan,
the development intends to integrate
into the larger desert character by
having open edges along the perimeter
of the community. The open edge plan
will promote visual and physical
connectivity to and from the property,
maintain washes and other significant
landforms, and protect flora and fauna
in the area. A minimum of 60% of the
open edge treatment will be provided
along the preserve edge.
Edge Openness Plan, Source: Gammage &
Burnham
Page 932
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
10. Landscape Standards: The PUD outlines landscaping standards that exceed
the requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Below is a summary of
the landscape standards proposed in the PUD development narrative for the
single-family land use districts, which can be found on pages 35 and 36 of the
PUD Development Narrative.
SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
Development
SFR-3 SFR-5 SFR-7 SFR-9 SFR-14
Standard
Minimum Common Landscape Setbacks
Sonoran
Desert Drive 30 feet average, 15 feet minimum
ROW
Arterial/
Collector 15 feet average, 10 feet minimum
ROW
All Other
Perimeter
No requirement
Property
Lines
Common Area
(per Master
20% gross
Development
Parcel)
Common Area
(per
10% gross
Neighbirhood
Unit)
Landscape
Standars
Perimeter common: Trees spaces a maximum of 20 to 30 feet
Adjacent to
on center or in equivalent groupings
Sonoran Desert
Drive
Neighborhood Entry Units will provide a detached 6-foot-wide public sidewalk
with enhanced landscaping and shade trees planted at an interval of 1 tree per
25 feet or in equivalent groupings. A minimum of three 3-inch caliper shade
trees will be planted on either side of the Neighborhood Entry Unit. Any
additional trees shall be a combination of 1-inch caliper (maximum 25%) and 2-
inch caliper (maximum 75%) trees.
Local street sidewalks will be 5 feet in width and attached on both sides of
local streets, except in locations where adjacent to common open space areas.
To encourage shading of sidewalks, shade trees shall be planted with the front
yard of all residential lots. Each shade tree shall be a minimum 24 inch box
tree.
Page 933
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
11. Open Space: Verdin has partnered with the National Wildlife Federation to
establish guidelines to maintain natural habitats and native species within the
community. The collaboration will use a minimum of 80% native plants, develop
habitat management plans for Verdin’s Homeowner’s Association(s), support
monarch butterfly recovery efforts, and design and build Early Childhood Health
Outdoors playscapes.
The use of native plants creates an environment that is familiar to wildlife
species and consistent with what is found in the natural desert environment.
Natural open space areas will be designated for the purposed of maintaining
sensitive habitat and natural desert character. These open areas will be marked
with signage and fencing to reduce human impact and promote property edges
that blend seamlessly with the adjacent desert environment. Verdin has
identified unique area types that will promote the above principles.
Certified Area Open Space Types, Source: Gammage & Burnham
Type A, Preserved Habitat, areas will emphasize the preservation of existing
natural, undisturbed desert. Type B, Natural Revegetated, areas are those that
require disturbances, but are revegetated with the intent to match the plant
densities and character of the natural desert. Salvaged and nursery-grown
native plant materials will be utilized for the revegetation and temporary
irrigation of these materials will be allowed to support the re-establishment.
Type C, Maintained, areas will be common open space for recreational uses
and/or may require ongoing aesthetic maintenance.
Page 934
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
12. Design Guidelines: The PUD sets forth an extensive list of design
requirements for neighborhood units, streets, pedestrian connectivity, open
space, amenities, grading and drainage, and utilities. The PUD also integrates
a number of design considerations based on the Desert Character Overlay
District standards, including a sensitive transituon from open space to
developed areas, conservation of washes and wildlife habitats, and use of
native plants. There are also architectural standards for elevations, windows,
doors, and roofs. These standards and design features ensure that a high-
quality development is provided on site with a diversity in elevation
combinations. Architectural standards includes a variety in traditional roof
forms, outdoor living spaces, signature design elements, articulation, pop-outs,
and recesses. The complete language regarding design guidelines can be
found on pages 47 through 122.
13. Amenities: The PUD proposes two
community amenity areas and parks
and common open spaces equitably
distributed throughout the community.
A primary community amenity area will
include a private community center and
outdoor recreation facilities. Other
primary community resident amenities
may include a pool, play area, even and
gathering lawn, patio with fire pit, yoga,
meditation area, and outdoor lounge
area/kitchen. A secondary community
Conceptual Community Area, Source:
open space is proposed to include a
Gammage & Burnham
ramada, play area, demonstration
garden, and lawn seating area.
Verdin will also include neighborhood parks that can provide a combination of
active and passive uses at a smaller scale. The neighborhood parks will be
located centrally to each neighborhood unit.
14. Signage: Signs within the PUD will comply with Section 705 of the Zoning
Ordinance with some modifications regarding ground and combination signs.
The Primary Ornamental Entry Signs will be provided near the primary entrance
and/or along the primary collector. A maximum of two primary ornamental entry
signs are permitted in the development. These signs will be 12-feet maximum
in height, but non-supporting structures such as towers, columns, and trims may
be up to a maximum of 30 feet in height. The maximum sign lettering area is
100 square feet per sign.
The Neighborhood Unit Signs and Secondary Ornamental Entry Signs are
freestanding ground mounted signs located on or incorporated into a solid base,
or wall mounted signs. There will be a maximum of two single-faced
Page 935
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
neighborhood unit identification signs or one double-faced neighborhood unit
identification sign allowed per entrance to a neighborhood unit. The maximum
height for these signs is 8 feet, including embellishments, architecture, walls, or
other similar features. The maximum sign lettering is 44 square feet per sign.
CITYWIDE STUDIES AND POLICIES
15. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on street frontages should be detached from
the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide
thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. The
development will provide detached sidewalks along primary and secondary
collectors, adjacent to Neighborhood Unit entries, and adjacent to common
open spaces with contiguous local street frontages greater than 50 feet and 15-
feet in depth. The proposed PUD narrative includes standards for desert-
appropriate vegetation and trees strategically located to provide shade and
visual enhancement throughout the community. The PUD has also fostered a
collaboration with the National Wildlife Federation to establish design guidelines
to integrate and preserve plantings and existing trees in the development. The
landscaping standards in the PUD will provide significant shade for pedestrians
and will help reduce the urban heat island effect within the development and in
the greater Desert View area.
16. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide
an accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such
as bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. The proposed PUD sets forth
standards that will improve the pedestrian environment, including landscaped
paseos and trails, detached sidewalks, tree shade cover, and shaded open
space and amenity areas.
17. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure.
The Development Narrative states that an extensive pedestrian network of
walking and bicycle paths will be available for resident use in order to create a
sustainable and inviting community. Collector roadways in the development will
include the construction of detached 8-foot-wide public sidewalks, including
bicycle lanes. Additionally, the community open spaces will be connected
through a comprehensive system of pedestrian and bicycle trails.
Page 936
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
18. Housing Phoenix
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan.
This plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of
housing with a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through
increased housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes.
Phoenix’s rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a
need for over 163,000 new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply
relative to demand are a primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The
proposed development will provide a maximum of 1,420 units, which will be a
mix of single-family and multifamily units. These proposed units support the
Housing Phoenix Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by
2030 and contributes to a variety of housing types that will address the supply
shortage.
19. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a
goal to become a zero waste city, as part of the City’s overall 2050
Environmental Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this
is to improve and expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs.
Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to
encourage the provision of recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and
mixed use developments meeting certain criteria. The Development Narrative
states that recycling receptacles will be provided and a sustainable recycling
program will be actively pursued and supported for all single-family
development.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
20. At the time the staff report was written staff had received 82 letters in opposition
and 6 letters in support of the proposal.
Letters in opposition expressed the following concerns:
• Current road infrastructure is at capacity. Additional homes will increase
traffic and decrease resident safety.
• The preserve area needs to be maintained as is for hiking, biking,
walking, trail running, and other outdoor activities.
• Development will have a negative impact on the area’s natural flora and
fauna.
• The proposal should maintain the requirements for the Desert Character
Overlay District.
• Density/number of units is too high.
• Zoning should remain as S-1.
• Additional homes will result in water resource issues.
• Sonoran Desert Drive should remain a scenic corridor.
• The proposed development does not match the character of the area.
Page 937
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
• Additional development will result in further strain on the school district.
• These is a lack of amenities to support the development.
Letters in support discussed the following items:
• Density at 3 dwelling units per acre is reasonable for the area.
• The proposal will provide additional housing, which is needed in the area.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
21. The Parks and Recreation Department provided comments indicating that the
Department would want to purchase the parcel to the east of the development,
but did not have a trailhead planned for the site and did not foresee the need for
connection from Verdin at this time.
22. The Street Transportation Department provided the following comments:
• The developer is required to complete a Traffic Impact Study to the City
for the development. Additionally, the developer shall submit Master
Street Design and Phasing Plants for each Development Unit. This is
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 and 3.
• Public Roadways shall meet appropriate Storm Water Design Manual
standards for wash crossings. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4.
• The developer shall provide the appropriate construction for right-of-way
within and adjacent to the development. This is addressed in Stipulation
No. 5.
23. The Water Services Department commented that the closest water and sewer
mains are within Cave Creek Road. The Department stated that new water
main extensions will be required at the time of development and particular
pressure zones will require private booster pumps. The Department stated that
depending on the timing for the development, the development can either flow
to the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant or to the Cave Creek Water
Reclamation Plant. The developer may also be required to upsize or provide a
relief sewer line to portions of the existing sewer main within Cave Creek Road
to accommodate the increased flows.
24. The Floodplain Management Division of the Public Works Department has
indicated that the parcel is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), as
designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The
division indicated that no encroachment is allowed in the floodway without
hydrologic and hydraulic analysis showing no rise in water surface elevation and
increase in the special flood hazard boundaries. The division also indicated that
the lowest floor of all structures constructed in the SFHA shall be a minimum of
Page 938
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
one foot above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The lowest adjacent grade to
the structure must be a minimum of at or above the BFE. Additionally, no
basements are allowed in residential structures located in a SFHA.
25. The Fire Department indicated that they do not anticipate any problems with the
referenced case. Additionally, site and buildings shall comply with the Phoenix
Fire Code. The current water supply is also unknown, but will be required to
meet fire flow requirements.
OTHER
26. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive.
If further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site
and immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous
archaeological projects have been conducted within this project area, it is
recommended that archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be
conducted. Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations may be
necessary based upon the results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must
make this determination in consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist.
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery
and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and
allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation
Nos. 6 through 9.
27. Development and use of the site are subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.
Other formal action such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.
Findings
1. The proposed PUD is located directly adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and
includes standards that ensure appropriate transitions from the development to
adjacent preserve areas.
2. The proposal balances the need for additional housing, while retaining and
preserving the desert landscape throughout the development, as outlined in the
North Land Use Plan and Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
3. The proposal includes several development standards, such as increased open
edge conditions, increased common area, and design guidelines that exceed
conventional Zoning Ordinance standards.
Page 939
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
Stipulations
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:
a. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant analysis
for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as 7th Street
and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all additional
dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by the
approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
7. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
Page 940
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
March 9, 2022
8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
Writer
Julianna Pierre
March 9, 2022
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Community correspondence (111 pages)
Verdin PUD date stamped March 3, 2022
Page 941
RE-35
E SONORAN DESERT DR
Desert Maintenance
Character A Overlay
S-1 District
S-1
Desert Maintenance
Character B
Overlay District
I Feet
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
DYNAMITE BLVD
47,000 23,500 0 47,000 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
Z-62-18 PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
SR-101
BLACK MTN PKY
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
FROM:
S-1 DCOD (144.82 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
10/16/2018 S-1 (333.57 a.c.)
Z-62-18 REVISION DATES:
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 a.c.)
10/17/2018 10/22/2018
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET 10/19/2018 12/01/2022
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
TO:
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 a.c.)
488.63 Acres QS 52-31, QS 52-32
QS 52-33, QS 53-32 Q-9 PUD (333.57 a.c)
QS 53-33, QS 54-32, QS 54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD, S-1, RE-35 DCOD 145, 333, 11 N/A, N/A, 13
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD), PUD 186 (465), 1,000; Not to exceed 1,420 overall N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-62-18 _Nov_2021_Update.mxd
Page 942
RE-35
E SONORAN DESERT DR
Desert Maintenance
Character A Overlay
S-1 District
S-1
Desert Maintenance
Character B
Overlay District
m apse rv ic es@ p hoe nix . go v
I Feet
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
DYNAMITE BLVD
47,000 23,500 0 47,000 JOMAX RD
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD
Z-62-18 PINNACLE PEAK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
SR-101
BLACK MTN PKY
MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
FROM:
S-1 DCOD (144.82 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
10/16/2018 S-1 (333.57 a.c.)
Z-62-18 REVISION DATES:
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 a.c.)
10/17/2018 10/22/2018
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET 10/19/2018 12/01/2022
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
TO:
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 a.c.)
488.63 Acres QS 52-31, QS 52-32
QS 52-33, QS 53-32 Q-9 PUD (333.57 a.c)
QS 53-33, QS 54-32, QS 54-33
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1 DCOD, S-1, RE-35 DCOD 145, 333, 11 N/A, N/A, 13
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD), PUD 186 (465), 1,000; Not to exceed 1,420 overall N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-62-18 _Nov_2021_Update.mxd
Page 943
From: Jo Ann Snyder
To: sdemmitt@gblaw.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Case # Z62-18;GPA-DSTV-1-18-1 and ZTA5-18
Date: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:38:03 AM
In response to your notification letter dated 10/12—we object to the rezoning of this area to
accommodate more housing.
Ronald Spicer and Jo Ann Snyder Spicer
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Page 944
From: Scott Coll
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Phoenix Sonoran Preserve - Taylor Morrison/Macewan480 Rezoning Proposal
Date: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 1:57:16 PM
Hello Desert View VPC,
Just wanted to share that I hope there will be a vote to NOT Rezone a portion of the Phoenix
Sonoran Preserve to allow for a large scale neighborhood build to be completed within its
borders. My reasons for this hope are as follows:
1) Current road infrastructure: Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd is already at capacity for
the surrounding neighborhoods that are already built and/or under construction on the Cave
Creek side and the North Valley PKWY side of the Preserve. Two New Large neighborhoods
within 8-9 miles of this proposed neighborhood, USAA (located at Happy Valley/19th
Ave/North Valley Pkwy) and Sky Crossing (also being built by Taylor Morrison and other
builders located at Deer Valley and Black Mountain Blvd) will already clog access to
roadways that would be used to access this neighborhood and the Preserve (North Valley
Pkwy, 19th Ave, 7th St, Deer Valley, Tatum Rd, Pinnacle Peak Rd, Black Mountain Blvd,
Cave Creek). I feel modifying, by expansion, the existing Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd
navigating through the Preserve would drastically take away from any tranquility, and limit
even more the Natural/Organic Desert Landscape we have there now.
2) Night Sky Viewing: Would become non-existent with the increased vehicle traffic of the
new neighborhood. You'd have home-owners, and then any friends/family that visit and also
delivery traffic bringing light pollution and vehicle pollution to the Preserve area.There is also
the street lights and home ambient lighting from that many homes, approximately 1,420, that
will effect Desert Flora/Fauna and their way of life. Road noise as well from so much increase
in traffic could also cause an issue.
3) Safety: 3A: I've already observed in the last year multiple accidents at the Northbound
intersection of Cave Creek and Sonoran Desert Dr due to a backup of vehicles trying to turn
left on to Sonoran Desert Dr. I come home this way every day from work and have noticed a
substantial increase in traffic as far back as the AZ-51/Loop 101/Black Mtn Blvd interchange.
Then the same down Deer Valley or Pinnacle Peak, and then Cave Creek. Cave Creek
subsequently then backs up at Tatum due to the left lane being stopped due to a number of
vehicles turning left at Sonoran Desert Dr and terrible accidents occur due to people not
observing the slow down or being impatient. The severity of these accidents on Cave Creek,
and subsequent difficulty for First Responders to access the area, then cut off access altogether
to the Preserve and cause a massive re-route in traffic, if even possible.
3B: Cyclists will also have more risk along Cave Creek/Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd
due to increased vehicle traffic with this new neighborhood. I know City of Phoenix is
working to expand bike routes across the city, but this area is vital to the cycling community
by providing easily navigable routes that connect and are, for now, easily seen by motorists
driving in these areas to prevent any accidents from occurring.
3C: Adding more people to a Preserve environment will then make the Preserve itself unsafe.
It will become subject to vandalism from littering, illegal trespassing by motorized vehicles, or
even walking/hiking on unapproved trails (trail-blazing) and ruining crucial desert life that
takes years to grow. We need to Tread Lightly (https://www.treadlightly.org/) with this
proposed neighborhood and think of the lasting effects that it could bring, not only to us and
Page 945
our current daily living, but also the flora/fauna trying to live in the Preserve too.
4) Alternatives to a Neighborhood: Just because it is Private Land, doesn't mean you need to
grant them the Rezoning change to build a new neighborhood. If a Community Center was
proposed that educates persons on Desert life, and what it means to preserve this Natural
environment and improve our way of life (educational) by teaching of the past environment
that was Phoenix and the sprawling desert oasis and mountains from 100 years ago, that would
be something worth certainly entertaining for our section of the Valley. There isn't very many,
if any, of these types of facilities in our North Gateway Community that I'm aware of that aim
at educating our youth, and even ourselves, of what is around us and also what used to be
around us regarding the environment. A Desert Mountain Museum in this area would be a
welcome alternative rather than another large neighborhood decreasing our Desert Mountain
Landscape.
Hopefully I haven't ranted too long, and this letter will help aid in your decision to NOT
approve of the Rezoning of this section of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. This letter has also
been forwarded to Vice Mayor Jim Waring, Phoenix City Council District 2 Representative.
Kindest Regards,
Scott Coll
Sonoran Commons Community Member
Page 946
From: Adam Grant
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: FW: Rezoning of PSP
Date: Friday, November 09, 2018 8:00:30 AM
From: Jim Waring [mailto:Jim@JimWaring.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 1:14 PM
To: Adam Grant
Nicholas T Cappellini
Subject: Fwd: Rezoning of PSP
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: hporourke@gmail.com
Date: November 8, 2018 at 8:48:11 AM MST
To: info@jimwaring.com
Subject: Rezoning of PSP
Hi!
I do NOT support the rezoning of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve to allow for the
addition of more homes.
Respectfully your constituent,
Holly O’Rourke
Page 947
From: Jean Ann Rippe
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Phoenix Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, November 08, 2018 9:29:53 AM
Good morning,
My name is Jean Ann and I am a resident of Phoenix. The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is my
favorite place in the city to escape the craziness of daily life. I am writing you to ask you to
please NOT recommend the rezoning of the PSP. I appreciate your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Jean Ann
Page 948
From: Trudy Taylor
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Mac Ewen 480. Taylor Morrison
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 10:30:39 AM
I am most concerned with the proposed development near Sonoran Preserve
Where are these builders getting the water????
I think we are having far too many developments in the north valley
We enjoy biking and hiking from the Apache trailhead and it is most disconcerting to see the beautiful view being
marred by builders
Please save our preserves and open spaces!!!
Thank you
Trudy Taylor
Sent from my iPad
Page 949
From: Gary Kirkilas II
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve Rezoning and Desert Character Overlay District
Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 6:15:42 PM
Hello Desert View Planning Committee,
My name is Dr. Gary Kirkilas and I am a pediatrician at Phoenix Children's
Hospital. I am also a Phoenix Park Steward for the Sonoran Desert Preserve. I was
very disheartened to see that Taylor Morrison is asking to rezone 488 acres of
privately owned land from a S-1 to PUD so that they can develop a high density
housing development. It is equally disturbing that they are seeking to modify and
remove the Desert Character Overlay District for over 638 acres! As you may be
aware the Sonoran Desert Master Plan was developed by in 1998 and took over 10
years of collaborated work with the Phoenix Parks Dept and ASU to develop. The
Master Plan called for low density housing developments and to retain the Desert
Character Overlay District.
Allowing this rezoning to pass as well as modifying/removal of the Desert
Character Overlay District will drastically change the look and feel of this beautiful
Desert Preserve.
There are logistic concerns as well to this development. Several citizens who live in
the area are already witnessing traffic congestion along Sonoran Desert Drive and
Dove Valley Road. Adding the proposed 1400 homes to the mix will only worsen
the traffic situation even further....leaving a headache for citizens and our elect
officials to deal with once Taylor Morrisson has move on to another project.
I beg you to reconsider allowing the rezoning and removal for the Desert Character
Overlay District. Once the development begins the Desert Preserve will never look
or feel the same way again. I would be happy to discuss further or meet with you in
person.
Most Sincerely,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas
Page 950
From: Sue Pierce
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Proposed Dense Residential Development by Taylor Morrison Along Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 12:41:58 PM
Dear Desert View Village Members,
I am emailing you to express my concerns regarding a proposed development by Taylor
Morrison along Sonoran Desert Drive. I have many objections to this possible development
which I hope in the future we will be able to discuss in person or on the phone. However, for
now, let me begin with a discussion of traffic issues.
I live in Sonoran Foothills in a community called Desert Enclave. We have one entrance into
our community and that is from Dove Valley Road. Dove Valley Road at that point goes from a
four- lane road to a two-lane road with traffic going east and west.
During each work day, Monday through Friday, rush hour traffic (7:00 am – 9:00 am and 4:30
pm – 6:30 pm approximately) causes a long line of bumper to bumper vehicles to form making
entry onto Dove Valley Road difficult and at times dangerous. We have counted as many as
100 cars in a line during those times and have both pictures and videos of this traffic to share.
The addition of a dense residential development to the east near Apache Trailhead would only
complicate the problem. The developer’s attorney noted that they have some money in the
budget to improve traffic in the immediate area around Apache Trailhead but that would have
no positive impact on roadways in our area. The extension of the 303 East from Highway 17 to
Cave Creek Road could be a solution but it is my understanding funds for that project have not
been allocated nor will be in the near future.
It is my request that you support us in opposing this development. If you would like to discuss
it in greater detail, I am available at your convenience.
Thank you,
Sue Pierce
Sue Pierce
Founder/CEO
Pierce Energy Planning
(480) 773-0035 | sue@energyplanning.org
Please consider the environment before printing.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and
may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If
Page 951
you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error,
please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or
storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
Page 952
From: Blake Austin
Subject: Apache Wash Trails - New Homes Concern
Date: Saturday, December 15, 2018 1:41:19 PM
I am writing this email to voice my concern for the proposed plans with Taylor Morrison to
build 1400 new homes and jeopardize more of our beautiful mountain biking and hiking
community.
Please DENY Taylor Morrison.
Thank you,
Blake Austin
480-341-7543
Page 953
From: robertfletcher67@aim.com
To: Council District 2 PCC; JIM@JIMWARING.COM; PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: SAVE OUR SONORAN PRESERVE
Date: Sunday, December 16, 2018 6:27:58 AM
As a user of the Apache Wash Trailhead I would like to express my
concern regarding Taylor Morrison’s plan to construct, in a concentrated
manner, 1,400 homes on a 400+ acre parcel of land.
My concerns are the impact this would have on:
1. Traffic issues including the safety of hikers, bicyclists and walkers.
2. The integrity of the Sonoran Preserve Masterplan
3. Water use
4. Wildlife safety
5. Flood control
Please do not allow the integrity of the Sonoran Preserve to deteriorate
by allowing Taylor Morrison’s plan to be implemented.
Best Regards,
Bob
Page 954
From: Lance Morgan
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran preserve rezoning vote
Date: Saturday, December 29, 2018 9:58:15 AM
Good morning, I hope you have had a delightful holiday season. On a recent visit to the
Apache wash hiking area I learned about the proposed Taylor Morrison development. In my
opinion this is a shocking and horrible idea. My main thought is this; where else in phoenix
can you drive down a truly scenic byway? Once you head West off of Cave Creek road, your
taken back to a time of free open space, the way Phoenix used to be. You really get a sense of
a peaceful easy feeling (not trying to plagiarize the eagles, but you know what I mean).
This section of the sonoran preserve is just beautiful, with its tall saguaros, fields of jumping
cholla, vast expansive views, creeks and washes and not to mention the wildlife. I'm afraid if
the development on the south side of the hiking area is allowed to move forward, this area
will lose more that just its visual aspects, but it will leave an indelible mark on the psyche of all
who currently visit this area.
Moreover, I have a sense that we are moving into a slower economic time, not only globally,
but perhaps locally. Rates are rising and less people will be able to afford these potentially
expensive homes. This will not be green economic growth. We've seen this before; a large
home builder plows hundreds of acres of land, to only have it sit vacant for years because of
an economic downturn.
lastly, We need to stand up to these deep pocket home builders who are insistent on building
these cookie cutter subdivisions, that disrupt all in their path. We need to preserve areas like
this and not make the same bad decision as before, not only for us to enjoy, but for our
younger generations.
that being said, I would rather make the right decision and be unpopular with the home
builders, than to make the wrong decision and be unpopular the the voting base and residents
of district 2.
I thank you in advance for making the right decision and voting no for this rezoning proposal.
Kind regards,
Lance Morgan
4230 East Danbury road
Phoenix, AZ 85032
Page 955
From: Lance Morgan
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran preserve
Date: Saturday, December 29, 2018 9:54:52 AM
Good morning, I hope you have had a delightful holiday season. On a recent visit to the
Apache wash hiking area I learned about the proposed Taylor Morrison development. In my
opinion this is a shocking and horrible idea. My main thought is this; where else in phoenix
can you drive down a truly scenic byway? Once you head West off of Cave Creek road, your
taken back to a time of free open space, the way Phoenix used to be. You really get a sense of
a peaceful easy feeling (not trying to plagiarize the eagles, but you know what I mean).
This section of the sonoran preserve is just beautiful, with its tall saguaros, fields of jumping
cholla, vast expansive views, creeks and washes and not to mention the wildlife. I'm afraid if
the development on the south side of the hiking area is allowed to move forward, this area
will lose more that just its visual aspects, but it will leave an indelible mark on the psyche of all
who currently visit this area.
Moreover, I have a sense that we are moving into a slower economic time, not only globally,
but perhaps locally. Rates are rising and less people will be able to afford these potentially
expensive homes. This will not be green economic growth. We've seen this before; a large
home builder plows hundreds of acres of land, to only have it sit vacant for years because of
an economic downturn.
lastly, We need to stand up to these deep pocket home builders who are insistent on building
these cookie cutter subdivisions, that disrupt all in their path. We need to preserve areas like
this and not make the same bad decision as before, not only for us to enjoy, but for our
younger generations.
that being said, I would rather make the right decision and be unpopular with the home
builders, than to make the wrong decision and be unpopular the the voting base and residents
of district 2.
I thank you in advance for making the right decision and voting no for this rezoning proposal.
Kind regards,
Lance Morgan
4230 East Danbury road
Phoenix, AZ 85032
Page 956
From: Annette Cline
To: Kaelee Wilson; council.district2@phoenix.gov
Subject: Housing development on Sonoran Drive
Date: Monday, December 31, 2018 4:52:44 PM
It has come to our attention that the company Taylor Morrison is proposing to build a high
density housing development on Sonoran Drive. We are avid hikers and lifelong Arizona
residents. We treasure the preserves, parks and hiking trails and remain residents of the
Valley in large part for the natural beauty and outdoor activities.We have hiked in this
beautiful natural area. We feel that this plan puts not only the integrity of the Sonoran
Preserve at stake but also the wildlife and quality of life of the neighboring families.
Putting in this development is morally wrong as the The Desert Preserve Master Plan called
for low density housing within the context of Desert character overlay District. We are both
strongly against allowing this proposed development.
Annette and Steve Cline
Page 957
Page 958
Page 959
Page 960
From: Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Rezoning Requst MacEwan 480 Dilemma - PMPC
Date: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:24:36 AM
Attachments: Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480 Dilemna_PMPC.pdf
Village of Desert View and Ms. Kaelee Wilson;
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council (PMPC), a 501-c4 nonprofit
organization charged with the protection of Phoenix Mountains Desert
Preserves writes to you in strong opposition to the proposed MacEwen 480
PUD Application dated December 22, 2018. PMPC has been a determined
voice in support of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and the Sonoran Desert
Preserve since 1970.
PMPC has studied the Proposed Taylor Morrison Planned Unit Development
(PUD) to “up zone” the 488 acre Site south of the Sonoran Desert Drive
between the Cave Creek and Apache Washes and also incorporating the
smaller Mesquite Wash.
As the project that will set a precedent for all future development within the
Sonoran Preserve, PMPC asks that a density much closer to the S-1 and 35,000
square feet per residence be maintained. That ALL of the requirements of the
Edge Guidelines and the Desert Character Overlay District be maintained in
the development of the Master Plan. PMPC also asks that representatives
from our organization be included in the design process as the MacEwen 480
becomes designed.
See attached – Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480 Dilemma
Sincerely,
Patrick McMullen, PhD
PMPC President
PMPC : 12950 N. 7th St. Phoenix, AZ 85022
www.phoenixmountains.org
Page 961
From: Howard Myers
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Z‐62‐18‐2
Date: Saturday, January 19, 2019 9:29:16 PM
Desert View Village Planning Committee members
I am writing you in reference to case Z‐62‐18‐2, The MacEwen 480 master planned
community, in the village of Desert View. It is a request for a major increase in allowed
density on 472.3 acres of land located in the Cave Creek wash flood plain and surrounded by
the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and other undeveloped desert land.
While I do not live in Phoenix, I do live in the Sonoran desert in north Scottsdale and have
worked over 20 years with the city on their Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance
(ESLO), on their McDowell Sonoran Preserve, and on flooding issues with both the city and
the Maricopa County Flood Control District so I have a lot of experience with the desert and
development in it. The city of Scottsdale was way ahead of its time with the ESLO which
protected property with its rules on drainage and maintaining washes and also protected the
fragile desert environment by requiring all property owners to dedicate 25% to 80% of their
property to natural open space as a function of slope. That protection of the desert allows
residents to really connect with their environment and live with it instead of trying to
transform it into something else. As a result water usage is far lower because most of the land
contains natural vegetation which survives without any human interference and irrigation.
Also wildlife is protected and enjoyed by residents, again living in harmony with the
environment. Many of the county and Phoenix residents I talk to, who live in these northern
areas, wish the county and Phoenix would adopt similar regulations that wind up benefitting
both residents and the natural environment. It also makes development sustainable, even in
drought conditions like we are facing now.
So that brings us to this proposed development which is almost the exact opposite of this
philosophy. It jams so many houses into the desert that the natural environment disappears,
and then to make it worse they intend to add non native vegetation that requires a lot of water.
This development also has a major wash going through the middle of it and borders others
including the Cave Creek wash which carries a lot of water from a huge drainage to the north.
All the non-pervious surfaces will cause far more runoff from this property which will have to
be controlled. In addition, due to the density, there is no room for water to flow around the
structures which would mitigate some of the flooding issues. So drainage and flood control
will become issues with it. The same is true for wildlife. This area should have a lot of wildlife
because of the washes which are major corridors, and the Phoenix Preserve, but there is no
room for them to move though this development. The open space required in the ESLO
provides these corridors and the natural vegetation wildlife need. Scottsdale’s General Plan
also calls for the lowest possible density adjacent to the McDowell Sonoran Preserve to
maintain wildlife corridors and minimize the impact of development on the Preserve.
This development is an island in the desert, isolated by washes with only one possible access,
the Desert Sonoran Drive which will have to carry ALL of the traffic from this development.
The Desert Sonoran Drive was supposed to be a scenic drive through the desert, now it will be
a major conduit for all these homes. Also, all those cars will have to go to either Cave Creek
Road, or through the neighborhoods to the west, there are no other options. The Desert
Sonoran Drive will also have to carry all the water and waste water infrastructure, and none of
Page 962
that is close, increasing the city’s expenses in servicing this development. A single point of
entry for over 1400 homes is also a huge problem. A secondary access was shown, but it also
intersects with the Desert Sonoran Drive and really comes into the development at about the
same place as the main one so any disruption in that area, or past it, isolates all the other
homes.
This is just another case of a developer trying to jam as many houses as they can on to a
property without any consideration of the impact on the environment, other residents, and the
city. A reasonable number of homes, 500 or less, would allow it to be developed in a more
responsible manner, would allow it to be in harmony with the environment instead of in
opposition to it, and would have a less negative impact on all the surrounding uses, including
the Phoenix Preserve.
I hope you will consider the impact of what is proposed and as a minimum scale it back to
something reasonable. The developer will still make plenty of money, the eventual inhabitants
of this development will enjoy their homes much more, and everyone else, who lives near it or
travels through it, will be better off.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Howard Myers
President of Protect Our Preserve, president of the Carriage Trails HOA, and participant in
many city boards, commissions, and citizen committees over the past 23 years including
updates to the ESLO and General Plan.
--
Howard Myers
Home:
Addr: 6631 E. Horned Owl Trail
Scottsdale, AZ 85266-8511
Phone: 480-473-0109 (home)
480-262-3502 (Cell)
E-mail: howard.myers@cox.net
If you have any other e-mail or phone numbers for me, please use the Home
information above instead.
None of the previous work e-mail or work phone numbers are valid anymore
Page 963
From: daniel.centilli
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: jim@jimwaring.con; northvalleymultisport@googlegroups.com
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve, proposed Development
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 8:15:51 PM
Attachments: Screenshot_2019-02-19-18-52-09.png
Dear Neighbors and Teammates,
My name is Daniel Centilli. I am an airline pilot for Southwest Airlines, and a homeowner in
Desert Ridge. My wife is an MBA and a manager at Vanguard. We are well compensated and
politically active.
When I recently learned that there was a proposal to allow 1400 homes to be developed in the
parcel of land adjacent to the Apache Wash Trailhead at the Phoenix Sonoran Desert Preserve,
I was disgusted and angry. This is one of the last unspoiled open spaces of desert in the North
Valley. It is an area that many of my friends and neighbors use for recreation. We enjoy the
trails and bike lanes that are located along Sonoran Desert Parkway/Dove Valley. This
development will not only spoil some of the last, most beautiful desert in the north valley, but
will also lead to a dangerous increase in motor vehicle traffic along Sonoran Desert Parkway.
This segment of road is the most important uninterrupted stretch of bike infrastructure in the
north valley. It allows cyclists to connect safely from Cave Creek Road to Norterra and
Anthem. It one of the most utilized segments of bike lane infrasructure in Phoenix. I strongly
encourage you to view Strava's Heatmap, to view the evidence of this:
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#11.40/-112.05156/33.75318/hot/ride
This is a tool that allows you to see the combined activities of thousands of users of the fitness
application, Strava. Strava has been used in civil planning applications in regards to
determining where bicycling lanes are needed, and more importantly, in THIS case, where
cyclists feel SAFE riding. We, as cyclists, currently feel safe riding along Sonoran Desert
Parkway. .I am a member of North Valley Multisport, a triathlon club operating out of the
Anthem, Tramanto, Desert Ridge, and Cave Creek areas. In fact, North Valley Multisport is
actually the Adopt a Road sponsor of a significant stretch of Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert
Parkway.
One of the primary reasons I purchased an existing home in Desert Ridge was its proximity to
the Sonoran Desert Preserve. This is different than actually building adjacent to and disturbing
the preserve itself, as I believe that this development will do. Once this is done, it can NEVER
be undone.
I strongly oppose this development. Please consider the current users and future users of the
Sonoran Desert Preserve. This is a stunningly beautiful area that should be protected for future
generations.
I have attached several photos of this area, so that you can see for yourself the beauty of this
parcel of land. It should be preserved.
I intend to apply both social and financial resources to opposing this development, and any
publically elected offical that supports it.
Page 964
Sincerly,
Daniel Centilli
269 267 6630
Daniel.centilli@gmail.com
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
Page 965
From: Karyn Lupfer
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Proposed Taylor Morrison Housing Development
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 6:33:31 AM
I just heard through my hiking group that there is a possibility for yet another housing
development to be built on desert land, and as a frequent user of the Sonoran Preserve up
there, I am so disappointed with this. The sonoran preserve is a beautiful area, and should be
left alone. There is already a development going in on the west side of the preserve. Adding
another housing development will be detrimental to the area and those who enjoy it. Part of
the draw of the area off of the apache wash trailhead is that you feel like you've escaped the
city life, without having to drive for hours. Not only will the noise during construction be an
issue but once there are people living there there will be more traffic in the area, making the
dangers for bikers along Sonoran desert drive higher. More traffic means extending the awful
air quality of Phoenix up to this area too, which we prefer this area to locations within the city
because the air quality is better. And then there will be the impact on the wildlife. The
preserve is home to many, many creatures. Bulldozing the desert homes of these animals to
build homes will displace them. Where will they go? How many will have to be killed because
they start eating people's pets and suddenly this brand new neighborhood has a "coyote
problem"? Please, please, do not let this development happen. If someone wants to buy a
home at the edge of the desert, there are already plenty of existing homes by preserves. Please,
leave some nature to nature.
Page 966
From: Karen Chen
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Rezoning
Date: Friday, February 22, 2019 3:52:40 PM
Please do not rezone allowing 1400 homes to be built right next to the Sonoran Desert Perserve.
Respectfully,
Karen Chen
Page 967
From: Mike Devito
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Taylor Morison Homes
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 7:41:57 PM
Hello,
I live in by the Sonoran Desert Preserve and I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert
Preserve.
Thank you,
Mike De Vito
Page 968
From: Eric Idalski
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 5:33:55 PM
To whom it may concern,
I recently found out the plans to try to rezone an area adjacent to the Sonoran Desert Preserve. I wanted to email
you and advise I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
Regards,
Eric Idalski
32706 N 18th Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Sent from my iPhone
Page 969
From: Caitlin Leja
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: No houses
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 8:34:50 AM
I am a resident next to the Sonoran preserve. I am NOT in favor of 1400 houses being built next to the
preserve!!!! It will add traffic, congestion and take away from the beauty of the desert!
Caitlin Leja, M.S, CCC-SLP
Page 970
From: Kristi Terrio
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Apache trailhead, 1400 new houses
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 7:26:37 AM
Greetings,
I’m a resident of Carefree Crossings in Phoenix, 85085, and my backyard backs up to Dove Valley Rd. My family
and I utilize the Apache Wash Trailhead all year long. We are concerned over a builder-request to construct 1400
new houses directly to the East of the trailhead. This will cause issues to the already car-congested area, and will
ruin a beautiful outdoor destination for residents in North Phoenix (Sonoran Foothills, Tramonto, Desert Hills,
Anthem, Desert Ridge), Cave Creek, and North Scottsdale/Carefree.
Please contact me if you’d like to discuss this poor solution to urban growth. Please deny the builders request.
Sincerely,
Kristi Swift
Cell: 602-628-8838
Sent from my iPad
Page 971
From: Fran W
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: 1400 homes next to Sonoran Preserve
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2019 8:48:50 AM
We do not want to see 1400 homes next to the Sonoran Preserve
A removal of Desert Overlay zoning would completely undermine the vision and long term
plan created in the early 1990's for this area.
We live in Terravita and find Desert Overlay to distinguish our area from others to great,
desirable preference and benefit.
Ben and Fran Wylie
Page 972
From: Lincoln Burke
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Desired Rezoning of Sonoran Desert Preserve
Date: Sunday, February 24, 2019 8:54:20 PM
To Whom it May Concern
I am writing as a concerned resident of North Phoenix and active user of the Sonoran Desert Preserve. It has come
to my attention that Taylor Morrison owns 500 acres south of Sonoran Desert Parkway adjacent to the the Sonoran
Desert Preserve. It is my understanding that they are petitioning the City of Phoenix to have the area rezoned to
allow up to 1400+ homes built on the site. I want to strongly oppose this rezoning application.
While I would love for the entire area south of Sonoran Desert Drive to remain open desert land I do understand that
there will eventually be development in this area. My hope at this point is that I can assist in restricting the
development to only what is actually sustainable. I see multiple levels of problems with rezoning this area for
higher density. The first is water resources, there is no doubt that we are already stressing the existing water in the
area. The second, and far more important to me, is the strain on the school district. My daughters currently attend
Sonoran Foothills School. It has only been open for three years and is already overcrowded and has lost the pre-
school program that my girls both benefited from. Already there is a development by Taylor Morrison south of
SDD and just recently a plot of land due north of Sonoran Foothills School was purchased by Lennar. I am unaware
of the current zoning of that plot of land but be assured I will oppose any rezoning attempt by the developer there for
higher density as well.
I appreciate your time and consideration in this matter. Please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Lincoln Burke
Sent from my iPad
Sent from my iPad
Page 973
From: Christy Hart
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: I oppose the proposed housing development near Apache wash trailhead
Date: Monday, February 25, 2019 10:23:51 AM
I don't want to see 1400 home right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
As a mountain biker and hiker, I look forward to the pristine views around when I
am enjoying the Preserve. The enormous amount of homes would add hazard to
cyclists and hikers with the increased traffic.
Christy Hart
Executive Consultant for Rodan + Fields
Use the Solution Tool to learn what the Doctors recommend for you!
christyrhart.myrandf.com
602-819-2307
Page 974
From: Karen Severance
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, February 28, 2019 8:59:07 PM
Dear Ms. Wilson,
Please don’t change the zoning in the Sonoran Preserve. Our ecosystem is delicately balanced, and the denser the
zoning, the more damage will be done. Our desert wildlife and flora have already been negatively impacted, not to
mention an infrastructure already stressed beyond its capacity.
Thank you for considering the future of our beautiful preserve.
Karen Severance
Page 975
TO: Phoenix City Council
& Desert View Village Planning Committee
FROM: Matthew Salenger, Head Collaborative Facilitator
Living Building Challenge Sonoran Collaborative
http://collaboratives.living-future.org/sonoran-collaborative/
DATE / TIME: 3/2/2019 3:50 PM
CC: file, AIA Arizona
SENT VIA: email
RE: Desert Preservation vs Development
Dear City Council Members & Desert View VPC-
Let me introduce our group: We are one of over 250 international collaboratives attempting to
provide greater sustainability in our communities through education and assistance with the
Living Building Challenge (LBC). The LBC is a project certification program, much like Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), though far more wholistic and comprehensive. The
Sonoran Collaborative, of which I am the current Chair, is the LBC collaborative for our region.
I am writing you today in an effort to save more of our greatest economic asset: The natural
Sonoran Desert. It has been well documented our desert is the single largest pull for tourism. It is
also cited as a major draw by corporations moving to our region, as our climate and close-
proximity to preserves provides their employees with a high quality of life. Therefore, I wish to
request that you not grant a zoning change for a property surrounded by preserves, state and
county land. I am speaking specifically about a property of 473 acres shown on the attached map.
It has come to our attention a developer hopes to rezone this property in order to increase the
density allowed. Currently 400-500 homes are allowed, but the zoning sought would allow 1400+
homes. Either density would greatly damage the surrounding preserve through souring the view,
environmental damage through construction, and future home owners forging their own paths
through the preserve. The larger the density, the more damage will occur.
The LBC has 20 “imperatives” required to achieve full certification. The first imperative states:
Projects may only be built on greyfields or brownfields: previously developed sites that are not classified
as on or adjacent to any… sensitive ecological habitat. While it may not be the desire for these
developers to gain LBC certification, this imperative speaks to the universal truth that we should
not build on precious untouched native habitat. Why? Because doing so damages our own
economic, mental, and bodily health as well as that of fragile ecosystems around us.
The property in question is in a location that should never be developed. One look at the map
of its location shows this to be quite obvious. Our group would recommend the following:
1. The City of Phoenix purchase the land from the developer and designate it as part of
the adjacent preserve.
2. Barring #1, the City work with the State to purchase the land and designate it as part
of the adjacent preserve.
3. Barring #1 or #2, the City work (possibly with the State) to provide a land swap,
where the property in question becomes part of the preserve; and the developer
obtains an equally valuable piece of land adjacent to other existing development to
allow that development can be contiguous and the preserve can also be contiguous.
This will greatly reduce the impact development.
We hope you will consider working to avoid any development at the property in question.
Please save this preserve area.
Page 976
Lastly, I would like to mention these types of “leap-frog” developments are very damaging
and unsustainable, not only to the environment, but also to city coffers. They bring huge
infrastructure costs that will only increase over time, bringing financial hardship to the City of
Phoenix and the State. We would advocate for all future development to be limited within areas
without any un-touched land in order to help assure our continued ability to thrive as a metropolis.
In order to not over-burden our future, we need real leadership to recognize when decisions we
make now damage our economies in the future.
For more information on LBC: https://living-future.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Living-
Building-Challenge-3.0-Standard.pdf
For more information on our regional collaborative: http://collaboratives.living-
future.org/sonoran-collaborative/
Thank you for your consideration.
Matthew Salenger, AIA, coLAB studio, llc
Co-LBCSC Facilitators and additional signees: Sonja Bochart, IIDA, LEED AP BD&C, WELL
AP, Shepley Bulfinch; Premnath Sundharam, Global Sustainability Leader, DLR Group; Jeff
Stanton, Smith Group; Ashley Mulhall, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, WELL AP, Orcutt Winslow
Page 977
From: Mike L
To: Council District 2 PCC; PDD Desert View VPC; saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Housing Density Change
Date: Sunday, March 3, 2019 6:57:12 PM
Hello,
As a frequent mountain biker / hiker at Apache Wash trailhead I’ve followed with mixed
interest and dismay the encroachment of subdivisions on the surrounding areas.
Today I learned that Taylor Morrison is proposing to increase the density beyond that allowed
in the 1998 Master Plan.
Your feedback is welcomed as I educate myself with an eye to resisting this development and
its unwelcome impacts.
Thank you,
Mike Looney
--
Mike
Page 978
From: ALLENFAMTX
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Desert Preserve S-1 Zoning
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 4:17:09 PM
Dear Planning Committee,
We are homeowners in the Stonebridge at Dynamite Mountain Ranch subdivision. Please accept this email
as notice that I do not approve or support modification of the S-1 Zoning at the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
The planners got it right the first time and I support maintain S-1 Zoning. No hardship = No change!
Allowing 1400 homes to be built in this area will absolutely violate the beauty of the area, the already
compromised eco-system of our desert, and the original intent of city planners.
Please save our Preserve!!!!
Kristi & Lawrence Allen
1929 W Duane Ln, Phoenix, Az 85085
mobile: 281-658-8654
Page 979
From: Mary Caton
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Apache Wash Trailhead - Vote NO on 1400 homes
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 1:44:40 PM
Hello
I spend a lot of time hiking and biking in Apache Wash recreational area and think it is a bad
idea to change the zoning to allow for more density of homes. This area does not need 1400
homes near the trail head as opposed to the current 500 homes zoning. I do not support the
request from Taylor Homes to increase from 500 homes to 1400 homes. Please help protect
our natural areas from too much development and vote no to the request to rezone.
Thank you
Mary Caton
Page 980
From: flaxgulch@aol.com
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Opinion from local resident for your consideration
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 2:28:31 PM
As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
LaVonne Lindall\
6701 East Tanya Road
Cave Creek, AZ 85331
Page 981
From: Gail Martinelli
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonora Preserve
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 4:39:15 PM
As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran
Desert Preserve. There is to much building happening in our area. Please
keep the original S-1 zoning plan which only allowed low-density housing at
the MacEwan 480 zoning proposal.
Thank you,
Gail Martinelli
Page 982
From: righins mtb
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: NO to 1400 homes next to Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 9:37:07 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen
we have a lot of examples of how bad urban planning can destroy the environment and the
quality of life . We do not need to keep making the same mistake over and over. Bringing
1400 high-density homes to be close to the Sonoran Preserve will create caos in a peaceful
area, will affect the life of several animals, will destroy the beauty of the desert and will
mislead people that buy the homes.
There was a reason for having a "Sonoran Preserve Master Plan" and there is a reason for
allowing only low density development. Lets stick to the plan!
Home developers are only concerned with the money they make. The less infrastructure they
create the better. Thus high density is their choice. The problem is that those that build the
development do not stay there to leave in the caos they create.
Regards
Ricardo
Page 983
From: Steve Swerid
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Zoning
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 6:33:20 AM
Hi Jim,
Again, please note
"As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
Please keep the original S-1 zoning plan which only allowed low-density housing at the
MacEwan 480 zoning proposal."
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
Page 984
From: Steve Swerid
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Zoning
Date: Monday, March 4, 2019 6:32:07 AM
Good morning,
As a resident in Sonoran Foothills I would like to express my opinion AGAINST the high density zoning initiative.
We purchased our home in a beautiful neighbourhood with large homes and access to nature and open spaces. I
understand the need to progress however, changing from low density to high density is an ongoing trend that is
taking away from the beauty of the desert and quite frankly is reducing the value of our homes.
I don’t want to live beside apartments complexes and gas stations.
The city overbuilt and realized a crash not a decade ago and it seems like we are chasing this same animal again.
We need parks, open spaces, high end grocery stores and restaurants and not the continuous box stores and mini
strip malls offering the same old options of fast food, nail shops and pet stores.
We purchased our home because of the beautiful and discriminating neighbourhoods, pathway systems, green
spaces, privacy and security.
Please DO NOT rezone our area to high density.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
Page 985
From: Michelle Wedsworth
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Apache Wash Trailhead - Vote NO on 1400 homes
Date: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 2:56:57 PM
Hello
My family and I are active users of the Apache Wash and are not supportive of the
Taylor Morrison request to place 1400 homes adjacent the trail head. The land is
zoned for 500 homes for a reason and we do not support it going from 500 to 1400.
Please help protect the park and those who use it and vote no to the request to
rezone.
Thank you for your consideration. Michelle Wedsworth
Page 986
From: Kathy Allison
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: ‘Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix’
Date: Friday, March 8, 2019 6:45:59 PM
‘Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix’
Please don’t develop this land - it is needed to reserve our desert. Not to mention the noise
and pollution.
Concerned citizen
Page 987
From: Deborah Moore
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: debtoon1@yahoo.com
Subject: Sonoran desert parkway
Date: Saturday, March 9, 2019 10:27:35 AM
I am a concerned citizen who lives near the land set aside for everyone to enjoy. If a developer builds 1,400 homes
that road will be a nightmare and the beauty will be ruined. Please stop the rezoning for development . Think of
future generations who will not know the beauty we are enjoying now .
Sincerely,
Deborah Moore
4518 East Bajada Rd
Cave Creek 85331
Sent from my iPhone
Page 988
From: nicoletti@cox.net
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: To the Desert View Planning Committee
Date: Saturday, March 9, 2019 4:45:06 PM
Importance: High
Hello
I’m a frequent Apache Wash hiker and it’s come to my attention that a home developer – Taylor
Morrison, is proposing to build 1400 homes on private land just east of the Apache Wash Trailhead.
This will require a rezoning of low-density development (500 homes) to a high density development
(1400 homes.) The Sonoran Preserve Masterplan (February 17, 1998) specifically states that
neighboring development is to be low-density.
I have many concerns about how this development will negatively impact the Preserve through a
high volume of traffic, noise, water usage, wildlife interruptions, flood control and many other
impacts.
I hope you will consider not approving the rezoning request so that the Preserve will be enjoyed as it
is meant to be.
Thank you.
Susan Nicoletti
480.419.9373
Scottsdale, 85266
nicoletti@cox.net
Page 989
From: SUZANNE RAY
To: Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix
Date: Sunday, March 10, 2019 1:59:54 PM
Dear Ms. Wilson,
I am writing in response to the MacEwan 480/Taylor Morrison application (Cases Z-62-18-2; Z-
TA-5-18-2; and Z-75-18-2). As a resident of the Sonoran Foothills community, my quality of life
will be significantly impacted by rezoning this area to build 1400 homes with no buffer or
significant set-backs from the road or the Preserve. I am advocating to maintain S-1 low
density residential zoning. The integrity of the Sonoran Preserve is at stake as the Sonoran
Preserve Masterplan specifically notes a neighboring development is to be low density.
Increasing density creates negative impacts: this parcel of land has high value with regard to
habitat and water resources; and with regard to recreation, will detract from the user
experience. Increasing density also will increase the already present daily traffic congestion.
As I observed with the construction of Sonoran Gate, another Taylor Morrison community
along Sonoran Desert Drive/Dove Valley Road, the litter and garbage from construction trucks
and workers was abominable. As an endurance athlete who uses Sonoran Desert Drive/Dove
Valley Road and the Preserve daily, I fear for my safety with the dramatic increase in traffic
that will be the result of rezoning this area to allow for all this construction.
I appreciate your consideration in this matter and hope you will conclude the necessity to
maintain S-1 low density residential zoning of this precious area.
Sincerely,
Suzanne J. Ray
suzanne_squires@msn.com
1709 West Burnside Trail, Phoenix, Arizona, 85085
480-332-2943
Page 990
From: Ralph Ray
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, March 14, 2019 2:32:28 PM
I am writing in response to the MacEwan 480/Taylor Morrison application to rezone the area on the
south side of Sonoran Desert road and build over 1400 homes in this area. I, like so many of my
neighbors, moved to the Sonoran Foothills community to be near this beautiful desert, and to be
able to cycle in a safe manner without cars crossing over the bike lane to turn onto or from Sonoran
Desert or Dove Valley roads. Adding a housing community of that size, and all of the cars and traffic
congestion that would come with it will ruin this area. The traffic during rush hour now is already
bad, with cars backed up on Sonoran Desert trying to turn onto Cave Creek in the morning, and
sometimes all the way back to Jomax in the afternoon, waiting to turn from Cave Creek onto
Sonoran Desert. The original zoning plan for this area to be low density was and is still the correct
plan for this area. I am not asking for no growth, just to keep the zoning as is, and not destroy this
rare, beautiful Preserve that so many people enjoy every day.
I appreciate your consideration in this very important matter.
Ralph Ray
1709 W Burnside Trl
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Page 991
From: jean brady
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Friday, March 22, 2019 11:13:27 AM
I personally drive the beautiful Sonoran Desert Drive several times a week on the way to my
sister's apartment. The zone changing notification signs are so ridiculously placed, that it is
virtually impossible to see what they say from the road. Even if you pulled over, which is no
easy feat, you cannot read them from the road; you need to walk through the terrain to read
what they say. Purposeful, most definitely. Not only are they quite a distance from the road,
they are also turned facing Cave Creek Road, rather than Sonoran Desert Drive. Definitely
purposeful. I have never seen these signs posted in such a way, have you? I've seen
thousands of them, never posted so strategically placed. Does no one check the placement of
these signs, to be sure they are actually posted and the manner in which they are placed?
1400 homes??? Seriously?? Who is approving this? Where will the more than 2000 cars go?
Another zoning change? Unbelievable!
Jean Brady
5338 E Milton Drive
Cave Creek AZ 85331
Page 992
From: Mary Jo Hardy
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: MacEwan480 /Taylor Morrison rezoning request
Date: Saturday, March 23, 2019 3:42:13 PM
Representatives,
My husband and I have just completed a wonderful bike ride in the Sonoran Reserve. Three days ago, we took a
beautiful hike there with friends. We were very surprised and saddened to find out that there is a possibility that this
jewel in northern Phoenix is in danger of being changed forever.
The current zoning and Master Plan has allowed moderate development while protecting the desert environment.
This has created a wonderful area for the enjoyment of thousands of residents and visitors.
Please do not put corporate profits ahead of the natural beauty and quality of life that the Sonoran Preserve provides
to all citizens!
The Preserve was created after careful consideration and planning. Do not change that now!
Thank you.
Mary Jo Hardy
Okemos, MI
(Frequent visitor to the Phoenix area!)
Sent from my iPhone
Page 993
From: Kelly Leone
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Taylor Morrison Rezoning request
Date: Sunday, March 24, 2019 11:19:05 AM
Dear Councilman Waring, Village Members, and Miss Wilson,
I plead with you to deny the MacEwan 480/ Taylor Morissison request for rezoning of property on the Sonoran
Parkway in North Phoenix. When the Preserve was created, zoning was thoughtfully and carefully designated for
nature and neighborhoods.
Approval of 947 extra homes will have an affect of more than just number of homes built. Included in reasons to
reconsider are:
1. Excessive amounts of traffic on Cave Creek Rd, 101 loop, I17, and Tatum Blvd.
2. Lack of amenities to support homes and families residing in them (including grocery stores and medical
facilities).
3. Lack of schools, will new schools and or district be created?
4. Sonoran Parkway will not be as biker/pedestrian friendly. Increased dangers for both.
5. Will change the entire landscape of the Preserve. When Phoenix advertises out of state I imagine they show our
natural beauty and not rows and rows of cookie cutter homes.
6. The impact of additional pollution from the physical building of extra homes along with the families residing in
them.
7. Affect on the natural washes.
8. Affect on the indigenous wildlife and plants.
9. Does Phoenix and Taylor Morrison want to look like liars, cheaters and shady operators by going against
previously planned and approved designations?
As a resident, home owner, tax payer and lover of Arizona I again ask that you deny the MacEwan/Taylor Morrison
request to rezone on Sonoran Parkway and maintain S1 and Desert Overlay Zoning.
Sincerely,
Kelly Leone
Sent from my iPad
Page 994
From: dave@cavena.net
To: Council District 2 PCC
Cc: PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 9:42:51 PM
Sir:
We live in Tramonto. I hike in North Hills almost every weekend, and 3-4 evenings/week on my way
home from work in Tempe. This evening I finished after dark, using my headlamp the last mile or
two. I drive to-from work via Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert highway. The desert surrounding the hills
and their great trails are quiet, calming, nice. Phoenix has done amazing things with these trails –
don’t despoil them with yet more homes we don’t need here.
I have seen the signs up to change the zoning, creating yet another development in the middle of
this spectacular desert. We don’t need this. We locals don’t WANT it. No reason exists from
standpoints of density, space, view - it’s flat and no one will have any sort of view from their home to
write home about – yet the view from both South Hills and North Hills, as well as from the scenic
drive that is the Sonoran Desert Highway / Dove Valley Road, will be forever stained by this
repetition of the development a couple of miles west of this new proposal. Another rectangle of
walks, houses, streets plopped down in the midst of a beautiful desert landscape.
It’s just another scar on the land, another need for water and sewage in a pristine area.
The Preserve wasn’t created, nor the trails created and maintained, to just look at yet another
housing development. It was created to give us all a break from housing developments, and
remembrance of what the Valley is really about.
Please vote against this, and for leaving the desert as it is in and around the Preserve.
Regards,
Dave Cavena
dave@cavena.net
626-818-0313 (m)
626-812-0930 (o)
Page 995
From: johannes marais
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: johannam0916@gmail.com; nukemanmaximus@gmail.com; Bettina Marais
Subject: Apache wash/Taylor Morrison
Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 10:53:49 AM
Dear Kaelee and Colleagues: My family and I have been using the Apache wash area for hiking and mountain
biking since 2007 (prior to area being developed for recreation). We strongly feel that Taylor Morrison’s proposed
development of 1,400 high density homes in the area of the Apache wash trail will be greatly detrimental to the
ecosystem and the public who loves to use the fabulous recreational infrastructure the city of Phoenix has put in
place there. This development will add at least 1,400 cars to the SONORAN desert drive and cave creek rd that is
already heavily congested with traffic. Thanks in advance for your consideration
JJ Marais
Mobile 602-315-6079
Page 996
From: Lindsey Tillman
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Preserve My Home - Maintain S-1 Zoning
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 5:47:39 AM
Hi,
My name is Lindsey Tillman. I have lived in North Phoenix since I was 5. A lot has changed since
1992. I have wonderful memories growing up in Desert Hills. I remember running off and playing in
the desert washes, riding my horse on secluded desert trails, and going on desert walks with my
parents and little sister. I remember loving when it rained because our wash would flood and we
couldn’t go to school. I remember riding my horse to my elementary school. When deciding to raise
my own family, I wanted a similar childhood for my children, and this is why we choose to live in
North Phoenix.
We frequent the Apache Wash Trailhead and live off of Dove Valley road. We are always amazed at
the beauty that is still there despite watching the desert develop around us. I am writing this email
to ask you to NOT allow this desert to be overtaken with growth. Please preserve the quality that
makes North Phoenix a desirable and unique place to live. The vast desert views and tower saguaros
are not something someone can get in Chandler or Gilbert and why people love this area.
Please MAINTAIN S-1 ZONING. I do not want to see 1400 homes built on the Sonoran Desert
Preserve.
Thank you for preserving my home.
Lindsey Tillman
623-694-4088
lindseybtillman@gmail.com
Page 997
From: Diana Duran
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: MacEwen 480 Taylor Morrison"s rezoning request
Date: Thursday, March 28, 2019 12:02:44 PM
Hello,
I am writing to you as a homeowner that lives in the Sonoran Foothills HOA off of Sonoran
Desert Drive. I have read the 117 page Planned Unit Development Narrative and I have a
major concern about adding an additional 940 homes.
I am not opposed to the S1 Zoning which is the original zoning. What I am opposed to is
changing the Desert Overlay Zoning and S1 Zoning. Adding 1,420 homes will add an
additional 2,840 cars to Sonoran Desert Drive which happens to be a two lane scenic road.
That is a lot of cars on a scenic drive.
Sonoran Desert Drive ends at N Valley Parkway and Cave Creek Road. The additional 940
homeowners (and I'm sure they will be multiple car owners) will be driving to N Valley
Parkway or Cave Creek Rd for shopping and schooling. N Valley Parkway is already
crowded with the build-out of Sonoran Gate and then there will be additional homes on Dove
Valley Rd once Lennar Homes builds out. It is difficult to turn left or right onto Dove Valley
Rd these days.
If you look at page 115 of their proposal you can see they are surrounded by Apache Wash
and Cave Creek Wash as well as having Mesquite Tank Wash roll right through this proposed
subdivision. I can't see additional access roads being built. It seems the only access roads to
this subdivision is Sonoran Desert Drive. I ride my bicycle on this drive every weekend.
Please keep the original zoning and only allow 480 homes to be built and keep the Desert
Overlay designation.
Kind Regards,
Diana Duran, CMA, MBA
Page 998
Page 999
Page 1000
Page 1001
Page 1002
Page 1003
Page 1004
Page 1005
From: Jill Hoffman
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Re-zoning Taylor Morrison Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Saturday, March 30, 2019 6:42:57 PM
Hello,
My name is Jill Hoffman and I am a resident of Sonoran Foothills. I would love to attend the planning
meeting on Tuesday evening, but my son has a playoff baseball game that night and my husband is
currently going through cancer treatment at Mayo, so he is unable to take him or attend the meeting. We are
trying to keep the kids lives as close to normal as possible, which means missing the re-zoning meeting.
I am very concerned about the plans Taylor Morrison has to change the current zoning for their project on
Sonoran Desert Drive. I support a change in zoning when it supports the surrounding community, but their
plans do not enhance our community in any way, it only adds 1400 new homes to an area not zoned or
designed to handle that. It goes against everything that is written on the Desert View Village Planning
Community website. The site talks about "higher densities along the Loop 101 freeway”, and about the
"natural washes that have biking, walking, equestrian and multi use trails that provide an abundance of
opportunities for recreation in the LOWER density areas". By approving Taylor Morrisons’ request to
change the density zoning, you are going against everything listed on the website and what the current
residents love about our village. To allow Taylor Morrison to also change the Desert Character Overylay,
also changes what the plan for the village is. Why should they be exempt from the plan? It’s one thing when
it’s in the higher density area, but this is adjacent to the Desert Preserve. Does that mean if they are
approved for the character overlay change, I can have grass and queen palms in my front yard? There was a
plan for a reason, so builders wouldn’t change the landscape of the beautiful desert we have here in north
Phoenix.
For the last 8 weeks, we have driven to Mayo on eastbound Sonoran Desert Drive 5 days a week. It is a
gorgeous road, but very crowded, and full of people with road rage in the morning. I drive 60 mph and have
been flipped off more times than I can count, (the speed limit is 45). It is so overcrowded, I can not imagine
how that road can handle more traffic the way the road was planned. The road would clearly need to be
widened, which would be against what it was meant to be, also at whose cost? The city? I sure hope not! I
don’t want the high density neighborhood, and now I’ll probably get to help pay for their access.
Another concern is that Sonoran Foothills School is already planning on building 4 new classrooms because
our school is past capacity in just it's 4th year. That neighborhood will also be assigned to a high school that
no one wants to go to, so they can open enroll elsewhere like we all do. I’m sure they would love to drive
their kids all the way to BGHS for all their activities so that we can help BGHS's test scores. That is one of
the biggest issues in holding us back from being a true community, we all split to 3 different high schools…
Boulder Creek, O’Connor and Pinnacle.
The 303 exit was not planned very well either, as that lane backs up to Dixileta by 4:30 every day. It’s un-
nerving to see the scared face in your rearview mirror when a driver doesn’t expect to stop on the freeway
going 70mph. If you continue to approve these zoning changes, it will take away our safety and from the
amazing village that was planned. Stick to the plan and keep our desert village great!
I sincerely hope you will consider my concerns. I love our north Phoenix neighborhood and hate to see it
destroyed by greedy builders. I have no issue with new homes, but it needs to fit within the current plan and
the builder needs to provide the infrastructure to support the growth.
Jill Hoffman
Page 1006
From: azmitchlove
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Desert Drive needs to remain as is
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2019 4:29:23 PM
Sonoran Desert Drive Zoning needs to remain as is. This is the most beautiful area in North
Phoenix and the Drive is such an amazing place to ride a bike or hike off of. Please please do
not give in to developers again.
470 homes is too much as is. 1,400 homes will ruin our community, natural resources and the
pristine desert we all enjoy.
Water is a major factor to consider. AZ is running out. I see all the wells Phoenix is digging
around town already. Another 1400 homes right here is a huge strain. We need to moderate
growth for a bit.
Traffic is another major issue. Taylor Morrison’s study is sided and misleading. Cave Creek
road has already seen an insane increase in traffic and accidents. Adding these homes will
make the roads a nightmare.
The signage is misleading and has been moved. How long have the signs been 100 yards or
more off of the road? I drove down Sonoran Desert Drive on Saturday to go hiking and saw
the signs are now closer to the road. How many people do not know about the meeting or the
rezoning request because they were not going to go offroading to read the signs...that is if they
even saw them from the road. Poor gamesmanship on the builder. They should not get away
with these misleading tactics.
Our community will be left with the consequences once Taylor Morrison and their competitors
move on. Please do not let them take advantage of the area and the city.
Thanks
Mitch Love
602-430-5152
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Page 1007
From: Maureen Love
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2019 4:11:04 PM
Sonoran Desert Drive Zoning needs to remain.
470 homes is too much, 1,400 homes will ruin our community and natural resources.
Water is a major factor to consider. AZ is running out.
Traffic is another major issue. Taylor Morrison’s study is sided and misleading.
The signage is misleading and has been moved.
Our community will be left with the consequences once Taylor Morrison and their competitors move on.
~Maureen Love.
Page 1008
From: Allen Frankel
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 4:40:26 PM
I am opposed to the development at the Sonoran Preserve.
Sent from my iPhone
Page 1009
From: Jeff Franklin
To: Council District 2 PCC; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Save our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 5:04:17 PM
Dear Councilman Jim Waring and Desertview VPC Committee:
My name is Jeff Franklin, I live in 85387 zip code. I support Save Our Sonoran Preserve and I
believe in the responsible and sustainable development of the desert in Arizona. This means
maintaining existing zoning of the preserve. Please vote no on the MacEwan 480 rezoning
request put forward by Taylor Morrison. This rezoning negatively impacts our preserve and
will set precedent for future home builders to put in higher density housing around the
preserve.
The case numbers are as follows: Z-62-18-2; Z-TA-5-18-2; and Z-75-18-2.
Thank you, and PLEASE vote NO!
Jeff Franklin
Page 1010
From: Micki
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Rezoning cases Z-62-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-75-18-2
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 2:29:46 PM
Dear Committee Members,
I am opposed to this request to rezone the area described as the MacEwan 480 in the above case
numbers. I own a home in Sonoran Foothills a development to the west of this proposed community.
Traffic is already a problem along Sonoran Desert Drive and adding 1420 homes can only make it
worse. Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a scenic corridor, not a primary route into and out of a
project with this kind of density. The developers are also trying to remove the Desert Character
Overlay on this property which was originally developed to protect the character of the Sonoran
Desert with density restrictions and building codes. Please honor the original zoning of 1 home per
acre and retain the Desert Character Overlay by not approving this request.
Sincerely,
Michelle Kelley
480-330-1799
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Page 1011
From: Ms Pat De Stefano
To: council.district.2@phoenix.agov; jim@jimwaring.com; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Rezoning on Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Monday, April 1, 2019 1:08:47 PM
I am writing to strongly urge all NOT to rezone the open area on Sonoran Desert Dr. I am a
frequent hiker at Apache Wash, and rezoning and building houses in that area is totally
unnecessary, would ruin the landscape, increase traffic, and displace the animals and
reptiles that live in the open area. The houses that have already been built are a true
eyesore to the landscape. Please keep Arizona open and free!! NO MORE HOMES on
Sonoran Desert Dr.
Thank you.
Patricia Kite
Page 1012
From: Cassandra M Leone
To: PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject: Taylor Morrison Rezoning Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 2:05:33 PM
Dear Councilman Waring, Miss Wilson, and Village Committee,
My name is Cassandra Leone and I am a longtime Cave Creek resident, Northern Arizona
University graduate with a BS in Environmental Studies, hiker, biker, and state lover.
I would like to express my absolute disinterest in approving Taylor Morrison's rezoning
request for MacEwen 480.
This development touts itself as a premiere living space, when in reality, expanding the
already unnecessary development of Sonoran Desert Parkway will result in a slew of issues for
Cave Creek and Phoenix residents.
Increased traffic along the Parkway, which is already affected by work rush hours, will likely
increase the amount of accidents seen in this area. I'm afraid that these accidents will come at
the cost of bikers, runners, and recreation enthusiasts - people who are utilizing one of the only
open spaces left in North Phoenix/Cave Creek to enjoy their preferred sports.
In addition to my fear of this community changing the landscape and overall beauty of the
Sonoran Desert Preserve and Apache Wash Trailhead, I'm afraid that it will also affect local
wildlife, and further accelerate our increasing global temperature. Currently, the land along
Sonoran Desert Parkway cools the moment the sun drops, and continues to be an oasis within
the concrete of cookie cutter houses along Cave Creek Road.
I beg of you to reconsider allowing more homes to be built than already approved. As it is, the
MacEwen 480 development is detested among many desert dwellers, as our views and peace
are slowly scraped away by development. Please do not allow any further expansion in this
area.
Sincerely,
Cassandra Leone
480-323-9694
Cassandra Marie Leone
Page 1013
From: Bob Thompson
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Planned development off of Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Thursday, April 4, 2019 12:46:47 PM
Hi, I would like to voice my opposition to any rezoning for the planned development of the
area near the Apache Wash Trailhead. The area today is a beautiful expanse of desert and I
feel it would be wrong to allow high density development along the Sonoran Drive corredor. I
encourage you to keep the zoning as it is today.
Thanks,
Bob
Robert E. Thompson
(M) 314-568-1314
mrrobertthompson@hotmail.com
Page 1014
From: LISA GALLAGHER
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Mayor Gallego; Council District 2 PCC; Council District 1 PCC; Council District 3 PCC;
Council District 4; Council District 5 PCC; Council District 6 PCC; Council District 7 PCC; district.8@phoenix.gov
Subject: OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD REZONING
Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 4:32:09 PM
Please don't ruin my neighborhood!! I strongly OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD
REZONING!! I drive Sonoran Desert Parkway on a regular basis and it is so
beautiful!! To allow developers to over develop the land adjacent to it would
be a disgrace to our desert and a complete disservice to the residents and
taxpayers of the nearby communities, out city and our state in general.
Approving this rezoning would open the door for other developers to do the
same and before we know it the beautiful desert and the scenic drive will be
gone!
OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD REZONING!!
Sincerely,
Lisa Gallagher
2425 W Bronco Butte Trail #1034
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Page 1015
From: jean brady
To: jim@jimwaring.com; PDD Desert View VPC; Mayor Gallego; Council District 1 PCC; Council District 3 PCC; Council
District 4; Council District 5 PCC; Council District 6 PCC; Council District 7 PCC; Council District 8 PCC
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 6:40:27 PM
I am writing to formally oppose the proposed development by Taylor Morrison of a property along
the Sonoran Desert Drive.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve serves as a natural, archaeological, & recreational area, as well as
to provide protection against flooding.
There has been discussion of the need to expand Sonoran Desert Drive to 3 lanes each way for
access to Cave Creek Road. This traffic study should be done at the expense of the developer
who should then have to seriously contribute to this expense. Cave Creek Road is already unable
to handle the traffic turning onto Sonoran Desert Drive, imagine adding an additional 2500-3000
cars!
The impact of traffic, human waste, pets, garbage, and the general encroachment onto open land
would be immense; this development can only have an extremely negative impact.
Please, do not allow this re-zoning. This would open the door for every developer that follows.
Sincerely,
Jean Brady
Page 1016
From: Council District 1 PCC
To: Kaelee Wilson
Cc: Racelle Escolar
Subject: FW: MacEwan 480 rezoning
Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 3:28:53 PM
Andrea Gaston
Council District 1 Office
602-262-7444
From: Daniel Centilli [mailto:daniel.centilli@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:10 PM
To: Council District 1 PCC
Subject: MacEwan 480 rezoning
Dear Councilwoman Thelda Williams,
My name is Daniel Centilli. I am a Phoenix homeowner in Desert Ridge.
I am actively organizing my community in opposition to Taylor Morrison’s proposal to rezone land
along Sonoran Desert Drive. We are paying attention, and we are not happy. Expect to be hearing
from us.
This letter is in regards to the MacEwan 480 PUD rezoning proposal, along Sonoran Desert Drive. I
am strongly opposed to the rezoning proposal, and I hope that you will take the time to investigate
this proposal closely. The north valley community is united in opposition to this development. The
developer has asked for for the removal of ‘Desert Character Overlay’ and the removal of ‘S-1’
zoning on a parcel of land that is immediately adjacent to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
A change in zoning will result in the building of more than 1400 homes in the same 473 acre
property. This will set precedent for any future development. It does not honor the vision of the
Planners of the Sonoran Desert Preserve. It will turn Sonoran Desert Drive into a dangerous, traffic
congested thorofare. It will no longer be the scenic drive that it was intended to be. We expect to
see pedestrian and cyclist deaths. There has already been an increase in automobile accidents as
drivers lose patience with the increased traffic. The developer will not be bearing the cost of road
infrastructure. The city has no immediate plan to address the increased traffic. We we told by the
developer that the city plans to address it in the 8-10 year time frame. Not acceptable.
A change in zoning degrades the more than $300 million dollar investment that the City of Phoenix
undertook to purchase preserve land. This is not good stewardship of city assets! The value of the
preserve is largely in its rural character, which is protected by “Desert Character Overlay” and ‘S-1’
zoning. What’s next is the complete intrusion of more dense development, spurred by this change,
Page 1017
and the precedent it will set.
Can we trust you to safeguard the investment our community has made?
A vote in favor of this change in zoning is a vote against the quality of life in my community. Our
current zoning makes an effort to protect our quality of life, the character of the Sonoran Desert
Preserve, and the will of our community to have shared public open space. We say, “Let them build
in accordance with current zoning. No changes, no exceptions.”
You as a city council member have an opportunity to do the right thing. Or not. We’re paying
attention.
A yes vote for rezoning would be a signal to us that this big corporation headquartered in Scottsdale,
not Phoenix, has an unequal say in what happens in our community. We are not ok with that. We’re
looking to our representatives to represent us first. Protect our community.
Please vote NO on the MacEwan 480 rezoning.
Thank you,
Daniel Centilli
*******
Page 1018
From: Council District 1 PCC
To: Kaelee Wilson
Cc: Racelle Escolar
Subject: FW: MacEwen 480
Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:31:20 PM
Andrea Gaston
Council District 1 Office
602-262-7444
From: Christine Severance [mailto:tutudoc1@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:02 PM
To: Council District 1 PCC
Subject:
Good morning.
I am writing to clearly state my opposition to the proposed development by Taylor Morrison of a
property named MacEwen480.
Reasons I oppose this include:
a) The proposed rezoning changes to the Desert Overlay District will open the door to urban sprawl
into this and other "State Trust Lands" that were originally created to maintain The Sonoran Desert
Preserve as a natural, archaeological, & recreational area, as well as provide protection against
flooding in the Maricopa Flood Control District.
b) The Taylor Morrison developer has not presented an adequate traffic study that identifies the
road improvements described in their proposal. There has been discussion of the need to expand
Sonoran Desert Drive to 3 lanes each way for access to Cave Creek Road. This traffic study should be
done at the expense of the developer so that necessary negotiations between the City of Phoenix
and Taylor Morrison can take place. The developer should plan their portion of this expense and
present it at future public meetings of the community. Cave Creek Road is already unable to contain
the change in traffic patterns, an additional 1400+ homes would overburden the roads.
c) The developer has not yet articulated the details of their plans about mitigation of the impact
their project will have on the Maricopa Flood Control District. The City of Phoenix should require
public presentation of the plans to protect the City from future claims from owners of present and
future owners of homes in the Flood Control District.
As someone who has enjoyed the Sonoran Desert Preserve for hiking and biking regularly over the
last 5 years, I am appalled at the suggested change in zoning. The preserve is meant to protect our
Page 1019
delicate desert ecosystem and the animals and native plants in the area. Combined with the impact
of traffic, human waste, pets, garbage, and the general encroachment onto open land, this
development can only have an extremely negative impact.
Please, do not allow this re-zoning. There are other areas that can be developed that will not have an
impact on the preserve, flood zone, and current residents.
Thank you for your time
Christine Severance
*******
Page 1020
From: Turner Justin
Subject: I oppose the MacEwan 480 PUD rezoning!
Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 9:56:30 PM
Hello,
My name is Justin Turner. My wife & I and our 2 young children live in Tatum
Highlands (85331) and appreciate all that the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve offers not
only the residents of the Valley but also many visitors each year. Our family and the
residents of Phoenix oppose the MacEwan 480 rezoning. PLEASE VOTE NO!! This
would negatively impact the Sonoran Desert Preserve as well as the Maricopa Flood
Control System. In addition, I do not believe that the developer has done their due
diligence in conducting traffic and environmental impact studies for this proposed
change. In speaking of Arizona, President Teddy Roosevelt once said, "Arizona has
a natural wonder which is in kind absolutely unparalleled throughout the rest of the
world. I want to ask you to keep this great wonder of nature as it now is."
Save Our Sonoran Preserve speaks for me. Thank you for your support & PLEASE
VOTE NO.
Justin Turner C) 602-618-7883
Page 1021
From: stephanie
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Sonoran preserve
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 6:35:20 PM
Hello,
As a Phoenix resident for the past eleven years I am writing to respectfully request that you
NOT allow the MacEwan 480 PUD Rezoning. Please think of the long term effects for the
environment and the increased demands for water that the project would bring to our desert
state.
Thank you,
Stephanie Dinner
Page 1022
From: hazardousheelers
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Opposition of the MacEwan 480
Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 9:14:01 PM
I realize the likelyhood of someone caring what I have to say it not in my favor but I
am devastated to hear about this proposed development near Apache trail wash. I
have had my horses in Desert hills for as long as I can remember and from day one I
dreamed of living out here. I put myself through school year after year to earn my
master's degree in special education. I worked my way through the ranks in the
school district until I got my dream job with a decent salary and I finally was able to
buy a house in desert hills right next to the Sonoran desert preserve. The peace and
quiet and small town feel is everything I could have ever dreamed of. Please don't
allow some faceless sycophant to steal what I have worked years for to achieve. Not
only do I worry for myself and my family's enjoyment but as a teacher I can see the
devastation additional students will do to our Deer Valley and Cave creek's already
overwhelmed school districts. You are considering allowing these greedy money
grubbing individuals to impact our future generation's level of education. After red for
ed I would think it would be obvious that pushing students into areas already
inundated with a huge population dooms the current student base to a mediocre and
inadequate education due to overpacked classrooms. Please remember the little
people when you review this decision. Please remember the students desperate for
attention and support and the teachers who are barely hanging on as it is. Please
remember the sacrifices and endless work I put in to be able to buy my dream home
in a quiet desert location. I am hoping common decency will outweigh profit in this
case.
Thank you,
Lindsey Zvara
Hazardousheelers@yahoo.com
Page 1023
From: scott stearne
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Taylor Morrison 480 Development
Date: Friday, May 17, 2019 3:15:03 PM
Hello, my name is Scott Stearne. I live in Cave Creek..I wanted to reach out and speak about
my opposition to the 480 rezoning request by Taylor Morrison.
Honestly I don't understand how Phoenix can even consider this zoning request. Traffic in this
North Phx area is already a growing problem and concern. Additionally, water is also a huge
concern for our entire state. I used to live in Desert Hills, and area that I'm sure you know has
serious water problems. I am having a real problem with Phoenix continuing to literally punch
holes in the ground day after day and allowing new homes to be built, seemingly with no
concerns over the water table dropping. You may know that over the past decades that the
water table has dropped almost 200 feet in certain areas. And yet, new Wells are still put in.
Now, with a new development in the Sonoran Preserve, that will put additional strains on city
water use and delivery. We should all be looking far into the future to assess the States water
needs..We just had a drought that lasted 10 years. We don't know when the next one will
happen and how long it may last. People are already claiming the drought to be over, which is
leading to more usage and less conservation. That's a serious concern for all of us. And, 1400
homes are going to use an enormous amount of a prescious limited resource.
Trash is another concern. Another 1400 homes produce huge amounts of trash, how long can
we just dump in the land fills? They don't last forever as you know.
Then we have the issue of density. 4 homes per acre is unacceptable. The preserve is s delicate
beautiful place. Let's keep it that way. Please keep the zoning to low density as the original
plan calls for. I know we can't just stop the development as a whole, I'd like to. I love open
space and it's a valuable resource for all of us to enjoy. But that resource is gradually
disappearing.
I ask you to please vote to keep 480 a low density zone. Taylor Morrison will survive, our
beautiful desert may not in the long term. I have many other concerns that can't be expressed
in an email..I'm sure you can get the idea here though.
I thank you for allowing my opinion to be considered.
Most Respectfully,
Scott Stearne
Technical Support Specialists
36721 North 25th St
Cave Creek AZ
619-733-6700
Page 1024
Page 1025
Racelle Escolar
From: Andrea Galyean
Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2019 4:32 PM
To: Racelle Escolar
Subject: MacEwen 480 PUD application
Hello:
For your information and for the members of the Planning Commission, please see the attached letter for the
position of the Arizona Mountaineering Club regarding the proposed rezoning of the MacEwen 480. The
original letter was sent to the City Council on July 1. Complete text follows:
July 1, 2019
Phoenix Mayor and Phoenix City Council Members
200 West Washington Street, 11th Floor
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
RE: MacEwen 480 PUD Application, third submittal Jan. 10, 2019
Dear Mayor Gallego and Members of the City Council:
The Arizona Mountaineering Club, a 501(c)(7) not‐for‐profit organization based in Phoenix, Arizona, is a
recreational club focused on mountaineering and rock climbing. We provide outdoor education and
experiences and advocate to protect climbing resources.
As such, Arizona Mountaineering Club is opposed to the request by real estate development company Taylor
Morrison that the city waive established zoning requirements in order to allow a master planned community
of up to 1,420 houses on 472 acres bordering the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. Our objection is grounded in the
belief that the Desert Character Overlay and Preserve Edge Guidelines were put in place to avoid precisely the
scenario being proposed, with higher density housing and related hardscape development abutting the
Preserve.
Access to outdoor recreation is a major asset and a key attraction for the City. The Overlay now in place
maintains the natural desert character of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, providing a respite from the built
environment for the good of residents, visitors, and native wildlife.
All of those needs are reflected in the current regulations, which preserve those limited assets for the greater
benefit of the City. Therefore, we ask that you maintain the Overlay and reject any proposal that does not
conform to that Overlay.
Sincerely,
Andrea Galyean
Page 1026
Vice President, Arizona Mountaineering Club
4340 East Indian School Road, #21‐164
Phoenix, Arizona 85018
www.arizonamountaineeringclub.net
copies:
Members: City of Phoenix Planning Committee
Members: Desert View Village Planning Committee
Alan Stephenson, Director, City of Phoenix Planning Department
Kaylee Wilson, City of Phoenix Planner, Village of Desert View
Ingir Erickson, Director, City of Phoenix Parks Department
Sara Parks, Chair, City of Phoenix Parks Board
Gary Kirkilas, Save Our Sonoran Preserve founder
Page 1027
From: Rich Mogull
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Preserve Desert Sonoran Drive
Date: Saturday, October 26, 2019 9:33:53 AM
I am writing to express my extreme concern over the rezoning application by Taylor Morrison
on Desert Sonoran Drive.
I am not anti-development, but all too often in Phoenix developers purchase land under the
assumption that they will not need to comply with current zoning laws. This has created an
incredible moral hazard in Phoenix that, as citizens, makes it effectively impossible for us to
make decisions on where to live with any expectations that laws and zoning will be respected
in the future.
This situation is especially egregious since we will lose an incredible community resource not
to benefit constituents, but merely one developer that clearly never planned to worry about the
low density zoning.
That area is entirely reasonable for development under the existing zoning. Increasing the
density and removing the look and feel requirements will permanently destroy the quality of
life of all constituents in the area and the city at large who use the preserve.
I implore you to keep the existing zoning and respect the residents of North Phoenix and
maintain our local resources instead of allowing Taylor Morrison to run roughshod over the
city.
Thank you,
Rich Mogull
3640 E Louise Dr
Phoenix, AZ
Page 1028
From: Christopher Kowalsky
To: Toni Duenas
Cc: Julianna Pierre
Subject: RE: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
Date: Friday, February 11, 2022 2:31:34 PM
Attachments: image001.png
Toni,
In reading this it appears that they are referring to the Verdin development that is going through a
current zoning entitlement case with PDD. I am CC’ing the village planner on this email who oversees
that process in this area.
Julianna, please find the attached email.
Thanks,
Chris
From: Streets P STR
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 2:16 PM
To: Christopher Kowalsky
Subject: FW: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
Hi Chris,
Is this something you can assist with?
Thank you,
Toni Dueñas
Administrative Secretary to Kini L.E. Knudson
602-262-6136
From: D
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 12:29 PM
To: Receptionist PKS
Subject: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
Hello,
I’m just writing this knowing not much can be done about the never ending development of our gorgeous Sonoran
Desert…
Page 1029
But building on areas that used to be a preserve, building regardless of the natural, social and aesthetic value of
the land makes yet another development even more upsetting.
These ugly roof-to-roof homes are just concrete monstrosities created and “designed” without any respect and
correspondence with the surrounding nature - regardless of how much the developer will try to convince everyone
of a natural and "organic" feel and preservation of native habitats. 1420 homes cannot be organic - as it will
irreversibly damage the natural beauty of the desert and create even more traffic in areas that used to offer
incredible peace and views.
I truly don't understand how it's done - we see the impact already and it's so incredibly sad we don't give our land
more appreciation. One day, it'll all be gone - is there something that can be done about it today?
:(
Page 1030
From: PDD Zoning Adjustment
To: Samantha Keating; Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Reject Zoning Application Z-62-18
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 3:32:01 PM
Samantha/Juliana,
Is Z-62-18 moving forward? We received a comment email in the ZA mailbox. Please see
below.
Thank you,
Tricia Gomes, Zoning Administrator
Office: 602-262-4870 Email: tricia.gomes@phoenix.gov
► Planning & Development Department
Planning Division, Zoning Section
200 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix
From: MITCH LISWITH
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:58 PM
To: PDD Zoning Adjustment
Subject: Reject Zoning Application Z-62-18
As a Phoenix Park Steward, I am writing to ask you to reject Zoning Application Z-62-18. The
Sonoran Desert Preserve was created in 1998 to conserve open space from home
development. Groups worked hard to preserve the land surrounding Sonoran Desert Drive by
getting a zoning ordinance passed for a Desert Character Overlay, written to mandate low
density housing and maintain wildlife and desert view corridors along the Sonoran Preserve
Border.
This 480-acre parcel is known as Verdin (previously MacEwen 480). Listed in their narrative for
rezoning, "the property is uniquely situated as the only large, privately owned parcel
surrounded by the Sonoran Preserve and with access to Sonoran Desert Drive. Other parcels
surrounding MacEwen 480 are undeveloped and owned by the City, ASLD or FCD and
designated by the City as future Sonoran Preserve priorities". Rather than adhere to the
Desert Character Overlay zoning of 1 to 2 homes per acre on the land, Taylor Morrison (the
developer) wants 2 to 5 homes per acre on the entirety of the property. Over the past few
years, the developer has been trying to get the area rezoned from a low-density zone to a
high-density zone.
I am asking that the Desert Character Overlay designations be adhered to. I can't imagine the
damage to the desert that a huge subdivision right in the middle of open space would cause!
Page 1031
Sincerely,
Mitchell Liswith
1638 W. Royal Palm Rd.
Phoenix, AZ 85021
Page 1032
Page 1033
From: Nancy Vetter
To: PDD North Gateway VPC; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Proposed development by Taylor Morrison along Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 9:33:28 PM
Dear Desert View Village Members,
I am emailing you to express my concerns regarding a proposed development by Taylor Morrison along
Sonoran Desert Drive. I have many objections to this possible development and would welcome the
opportunity to discuss with you but for now would like to address the traffic issues this development will
create..
I live in Sonoran Foothills in a community called Desert Enclave. We have one entrance into this
community and it is from Dove Valley Road. At that point the road goes from a four lane road to a two
lane road with traffic heading east and west.
During each work day, Monday through Friday during peak times long lines of cars passing our entrance
have been observed making entering and exiting our community difficult and dangerous. Adding
additional homes off of this road will only add to the problem.
The extension of the 303 from I 17 to Cave Creek Road could offer some relief but my understanding is
that funds have not been allocated for this extension now or in the near future.
I would welcome your support in opposing this development.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Nancy Vetter
32618 N 16th Glen
Phoenix, Az 85085
602-881-3273
Page 1034
From: Gordon Hutchinson
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Taylor Morrison Verdin Development
Date: Thursday, December 2, 2021 11:50:19 AM
Julianna,
I am writing to you about the proposal to rezone 480 acres (Z-62-18-2) for development south
of Sonoran Desert Drive between 16th and 24th street alignments.
As a resident of Sonoran Gate, my concern is traffic volume along Dove Valley Rd and Sonoran
Desert Drive. Traffic volumes appear to be increasing on these roads in both directions as an
east west throughfare between Cave Creek Road and I17.
Are traffic studies completed or planned to measure traffic volumes on these roads? Are
there studies that project increases in traffic volume from the addition of approximately 1,400
new homes from this development?
Is this development contingent upon funding road improvements to accommodate increased
traffic volumes? Is limiting commercial vehicle traffic to local access being considered?
Thank you,
Gordon Hutchinson
Page 1035
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:15:49 AM
From: Lora Terrill
Date: Monday, December 6, 2021 at 5:55 PM
To: jim@jimwaring.com
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-Zoning (Z-62-18-2). We love our
Sonoran Preserve and want the City of Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1.
Thank you,
Lora Terrill
2517 E. Ridge Creek Road
Phoenix AZ 85024
*******
Page 1036
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 4:18:01 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
From: coco whitaker
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 4:17 PM
To: jim@jimwaring.com
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-Zoning (Z-62-18-2). We love our
Sonoran Preserve and want the City of Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1.
Thank you,
Coco Whitaker
3976 E Scout Pass, Phoenix, AZ 85050
*******
Page 1037
From: Christine M Pedersen
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Vote NO on MacEwen 480
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 3:33:29 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Monica Flint
Date: December 8, 2021 at 9:00:04 AM MST
To: jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Vote NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-
Zoning (Z-62-18-2). We love our Sonoran Preserve and want the City of
Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1.
Thank you,
Monica Flint
23624 N 57th Drive
Glendale AZ 85310
Page 1038
From: TIna Nuccio
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: I support the Taylor Morrison Verdin development on Sonoran Desert Drive
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 12:00:58 PM
I am in favor the reasoning request from Taylor Morrison, for their proposed development on Sonoran Desert
Drive. Clearly we need more housing, and the average 3 homes/acre seems reasonable and in line with the
developments around it.
Thanks!
Page 1039
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive.
Date: Friday, December 10, 2021 7:54:24 AM
Please add to the public record.
From: Bob Thompson
Date: Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 7:59 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Cc: Terri Hotmail
Subject: Proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive.
Hi, I just attended the Desert View and North Gateway Planning Committee meetings, during which
there was a presentation about a proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive a little bit west
of cave creek road. It used to be called the McEwing 480, but I think it’s now called Verdin.
During the presentation many mentions of Sonoran Desert Dr as a major transportation corridor
were made.
I wanted to reach out to you to express my opposition to the development as well as any other
developments in this area. The Apache Wash area and the Sonoran Desert Preserve is a great natural
resource and wonderful recreational area.
I implore you to help preserve this area as it is without further development. With the already heavy
traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, no additional traffic or development is welcome. I hope we could
get the designation changed for Sonoran Desert Drive so that it is no longer considered a major
transportation corridor. I’d also like the rest of the area to be changed from state trust land to
preserve.
Please let me know your thoughts on this matter
Thanks,
Bob Thompson
Mrrobertthompson@hotmail.com
*******
Page 1040
From: Sonoran Preserve
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Message to VPC Members
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 10:17:25 AM
Hi Julianna,
I wanted to forward a message along with some documents to the members of both the
Desert View and North Gateway VPC regarding the MacEwan/Verdin PUD request. I
copied the message below and attached the documents.
Thank you!
-Gary
Dear Members of the Desert View and North Gateway VPC,
First, thank you for your service of representing our community on the VPC. Your time and
dedication is greatly appreciated and respected!Second, since Taylor Morrison’s presentation last
month, I have been researching the multitude of concerning factors with their PUD request including
increased traffic without an existing transportation infrastructure, building next to a floodplain, and
building 1,400 homes in the middle of the desert also without an existing plan for schools and other
necessary infrastructure. Particularly, their request to remove the Desert Character
Overlay Ordinance, a written law to protect the integrity of the Sonoran Preserve, is that of upmost
concern.
The ordinance is clear. It very specifically states its purpose is to “provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density” and should extend down to the “Dynamite Blvd alignment on
the south” in order to “maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and wildlife corridor along the Cave
Creek Wash.” These boundaries are carefully delineated based on ecosystems to ensure maximum
preservation among development.
It absolutely does not state anywhere that its intent is to only extend to where the Sonoran Desert
Drive may happen to be located, as Taylor Morrison’s lawyer contends as their basis for
circumventing the ordinance. This well-written ordinance is explicit and Taylor Morrison’s request
for us to remove the ordinance is not valid.
There is a committed force of citizens that care deeply about this, encompassing over 1,000
members of the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group and hundreds of folks from across the city that I
have spoken with in the preserve. Importantly, it also includes valued organizations and businesses
such as the City of Phoenix Desert Parks Department, hot air balloon companies, and hiking and rock
climbing groups.
I have attached their letters urging you to maintain the Desert Character Overlay, not only because
it’s a law, but because it’s meant to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve - one
of our community’s greatest assets and attractions!
Page 1041
Thank you again for your time. Please reach out to me with any questions or comments.
-Dr.Gary Kirkilas
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
PSPMMPC L to PRB March 28 2019… [drive.google.com]
Hot Air Expeditions Sonoran Preserve… [drive.google.com]
AMC letter Phoenix Preserve.pdf [drive.google.com]
Sonoran Preserve Opposition Letter.pdf [drive.google.com]
MacEwen.pdf [drive.google.com]
CB_ltr_2019_cmt.docx [docs.google.com]
Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480… [drive.google.com]
Page 1042
From: Samantha Keating
To: David Urbinato
Cc: Julianna Pierre
Subject: RE: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:20:16 PM
Attachments: image011.png
image012.png
image013.png
image014.png
image015.png
image016.png
image017.png
image018.png
Hi David,
This is in reference to Z-62-18. It is a PUD and no dates have been set for hearing. The
latest draft of the proposal is on the PUD page.
Julianna – let’s add this to the case file.
Thank you,
Samantha Keating
Principal Planner
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-262-6823
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: David Urbinato
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:14 PM
To: Samantha Keating
Subject: FW: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
Samantha, I just saw this one pop up in the Republic. But I can’t pin it down on the rezoning staff
report webpage.
David Urbinato
Management Assistant II
Phoenix Planning and Development Department
602-534-3630
From: Michael R Angulo
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:04 PM
To: David Urbinato
Subject: FW: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
David,
Do you know what project this constituent is referring to? Thanks!
Page 1043
Michael Angulo
Research & Policy Director
desk: 602-262-4822 cell: 602-478-6347
web: Phoenix.gov email: michael.angulo@phoenix.gov
200 W. Washington Street, 11th Floor
Phoenix AZ 85003
How can our office better communicate?
Click HERE to respond to our short survey
From: Council District 5 PCC
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 2:40 PM
To: Michael R Angulo
Subject: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
D5 Constituent public comment regarding a development project. How shall we respond?
Emmanuel Gallardo-Sanidad
Constituent Services Director
Main line: (602) 262-7446 Direct line: (602) 534-9721
Web: Phoenix.gov/district5
200 W. Washington Street, 11th Floor. Phoenix, AZ 85003
Page 1044
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:14 PM
To: Council District 5 PCC
Subject: emdist5 - Form Submission
FROM : Kyle Mickel
SUBJECT : Sonoran Preserve Development
MESSAGE : Councilmember Guardado,
Greetings. I am a supporter and a constituent. I am writing today after reading in the Az
Republic about the proposed development of 1400 homes near our beloved and precious
Sonoran Preserve. I wish to voice my extreme disappointment in this proposal and urge you to
oppose this large scale project which would severely impact the beauty, native vegetation,
desert wildlife and quality of life for residents who love to enjoy this truly beautiful and
remarkable area. We are very fortunate to have this grand mountain preserve in our back
yards. If you have not visited Apache Wash or any of the other magnificent hiking/biking
areas within the Sonoran Preserve lately, please re-visit this area to truly appreciate what we
have. Let's keep the Preserve and its desert inhabitants alive. Please voice your opposition to
this project when it comes before Council this Spring. Thank you.
Kyle Mickel
PS: Considering our severe water shortage, this project should not move forward on that basis
alone. But there exist so many other reasons to say no to this horrible concept.
Email : kylemickel4@gmail.com
AREA : 602
ADDRESS : 1808 W. Orangewood Ave
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : Az
ZIP : 85021
Submission ID: 0d168e3d18554c39a6752e0d7f81c44f
Form Submission On : 1/19/2022 1:14:04 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district5/email
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1045
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 9:25:28 AM
Hi Julianna,
Please add to the public record.
Thank you.
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 8:22 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Tina nuccio
SUBJECT : I support Verdin housing development near Sonoran Preserve
MESSAGE : Hi Jim. I want to voice my support for the proposed density of the Verdin
development. This area desperately needs more affordable housing and the area can easily
support the proposed density, given all of open space around it.
I am also a frequent biker/hiker (Apache Wash) in the area, so I do appreciate the amenities,
but know it was always intended to be developed partially.
If/when this is approved, if it is affordable enough, we will consider purchasing a home there.
Email : crn57370@gmail.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 549-8869
ADDRESS : 4450 e. Sierra sunset trail
CITY : Cave creek
STATE : Az
ZIP : 85331
Submission ID: 997d7a3ae3974fdc8684982db5123b90
Form Submission On : 1/19/2022 8:22:38 AM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Page 1046
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1047
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2022 2:46:48 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 2:28 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Kyle Mickel
SUBJECT : Sonoran Preserve Proposal
MESSAGE : Councilmember Waring,
Greetings. I am a 32-year Phoenix resident writing with concerns today after reading in the Az
Republic about the proposed development of 1400 homes near our beloved and precious
Sonoran Preserve. I wish to voice my extreme disappointment in this proposal and urge you to
oppose this large scale project which would severely impact the beauty, native vegetation,
desert wildlife and quality of life for residents who love to enjoy this truly beautiful and
remarkable area. We are very fortunate to have this grand mountain preserve in our back
yards. If you have not visited Apache Wash or any of the other magnificent hiking/biking
areas within the Sonoran Preserve lately, please re-visit this area to truly appreciate what we
have. Let's keep the amazing Preserve and its desert inhabitants alive. Please voice your
opposition to this project when it comes before Council this Spring. Thank you.
Kyle Mickel
PS: Considering our severe water shortage, this project should not move forward on that basis
alone. But there exist so many other reasons to say no to this horrible concept. I appreciate
your consideration.
Email : kylemickel4@gmail.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 299-6147
ADDRESS : 1808 W. Orangewood Ave.
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85021
Submission ID: ca17955446204320b564f8605e31035f
Form Submission On : 1/20/2022 2:28:17 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
Page 1048
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1049
Page 1050
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Verdin project support
Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 7:41:49 AM
Please add to the public record
From: Jennifer Ruby
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:32 PM
To: Jim Waring
Subject: Verdin project support
Hello Councilman Waring -
We’ve met a few times; I’ve been a constituent of yours going back to your days in the State Senate.
I wanted to take a few minutes to express my support for the proposed Verdin project. Northeast
Phoenix has been a wonderful place for my family to live for decades, and I welcome Verdin’s
additional single-family housing options. With all the exciting new employment coming to North
Phoenix, we need more housing so that employees can build their lives here and continue to grow
our vibrant community. The overall low density is entirely appropriate for this area, and the
thoughtful design exhibited by the Edge Openness Plan will be an enhancement not only for Verdin
residents but also for the greater area. I’m particularly excited about the improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive which are badly needed and unlikely to happen without new development.
Finally, North Phoenix will be incredibly lucky to lay claim to a master plan certified by the National
Wildlife Federation. Talk about leading by example!
Please also share my support with the Village Planning Committees. Thank you for your time,
Jen
Jennifer Ruby
2333 E Chama Drive
Phoenix 85024
*******
Page 1051
From: Jennifer Ruby
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Fwd: Verdin project support
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 8:54:48 PM
Hi Ms. Pierre -
I wanted to share with you my email of support for the Verdin project. I find the project’s
application materials to be very thoughtful and comprehensive. It’s rare lately to see a project
proposing only single-family detached housing...compare for example the recent projects
adjacent to where I live: Sendero Foothills and Stone Butte East, both of which include higher
density/intensity and attached product.
I believe this project will be great for North Phoenix. Thank you for your hard work getting it
to this point.
Jen Ruby
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jennifer Ruby
Subject: Verdin project support
Date: March 7, 2022 at 8:32:35 PM MST
To: jim.waring@phoenix.gov, council.district.2@phoenix.gov
Hello Councilman Waring -
We’ve met a few times; I’ve been a constituent of yours going back to your days
in the State Senate. I wanted to take a few minutes to express my support for the
proposed Verdin project. Northeast Phoenix has been a wonderful place for my
family to live for decades, and I welcome Verdin’s additional single-family
housing options. With all the exciting new employment coming to North Phoenix,
we need more housing so that employees can build their lives here and continue to
grow our vibrant community. The overall low density is entirely appropriate for
this area, and the thoughtful design exhibited by the Edge Openness Plan will be
an enhancement not only for Verdin residents but also for the greater area. I’m
particularly excited about the improvements to Sonoran Desert Drive which are
badly needed and unlikely to happen without new development.
Finally, North Phoenix will be incredibly lucky to lay claim to a master plan
certified by the National Wildlife Federation. Talk about leading by example!
Please also share my support with the Village Planning Committees. Thank you
for your time,
Jen
Jennifer Ruby
Page 1052
2333 E Chama Drive
Phoenix 85024
Page 1053
From: Ann Griffith
To: Jim Waring; Julianna Pierre
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Taylor Morrison Verdin Master Planned Community
Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 10:44:41 AM
Mr. Waring & Ms. Pierre,
After reading the recent Valley Vibe News article about the pushback on this proposed
development from the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group, I wanted to voice a counter opinion
for consideration.
I absolutely support the need to preserve the beauty and natural wildlife of our Arizona
deserts…it’s what makes Arizona such a beautiful place to live. However, I also understand the
economic importance of development to foster business development, attract the best
employers and sustain a generational workforce.
Our son, a recent CU graduate, relocated back to Phoenix after accepting an offer for his first
professional career position. His home search was challenging. After realizing he could afford
a mortgage that was comparable to the average rent, he set his sights on new home
ownership. It was extremely difficult to find new communities that were more central to his
work and that fit the lifestyle he was looking to experience.
The Sonoran Desert/I-17 corridor was a target area for him due to location and proximity to
shopping, entertainment and outdoor activities. However, what he found were thousands of
new/planned apartments. If this community were further along and offered affordable options
for first-time buyers, it would have been a strong consideration.
The vision for Verdin is beautiful. It strikes a critical balance between community and nature.
Developers and home builders need to do more for preservation and sustainability. Taylor
Morrison is setting a gold standard here. As you consider future development in this area, I do
ask that you challenge your developers and home builders to exceed the standard that is being
set here. I’d also ask that communities offer more affordable options for first time home
buyers (e.g. townhomes).
Sincerely,
Ann Griffith
Page 1054
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 7, 2021
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Reginal Younger arrived to the meeting and Committee member
Jason Israel left the meeting during this item, bringing the quorum to 11 members.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1055
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that Verdin’s contribution will only be for a portion of the
extension. She stated that as other developers build along Sonoran Desert Drive they
will have their own contribution requirements.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the North Land Use Plan should be considered in
addition to the General Plan. He stated that the developer should consider building less
than 1000 units. He added that the development will generate traffic and overload
schools. Susan Demmitt stated that the development will have a maximum of 3 units
per acre, which is consistent with developments adjacent to the preserve. She stated
that they are in discussion with the Deer Valley School District and the development is
within the boundary for Desert Mountain schools, which have capacity. She stated that
Cave Creek schools also have capacity.
Committee member Rick Nowell asked about traffic lights on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that a traffic study is being completed and that there will most
likely be a traffic signal at the main entrance of the development in the future.
Committee member Rick Nowell stated that he had concerns that the project has
returned after a couple years, but not decreased the density.
Committee member Rick Powell asked about the cost of the extension of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the cost estimate for the full extension of
Sonoran Desert Drive is approximately $120 million. She stated that the build out will
take place when the traffic demand exists and the funding is available. Committee
member Rick Powell stated that the development is not in line with the character of the
area.
Committee member Reginald Younger asked how close homes will be to Sonoran
Desert Drive. Susan Demmitt stated the development’s property line is adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive, but the site will have landscape buffers. Committee member
Reginald Younger stated that he is hoping for less density on site.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that the Desert View Character Plan should also be
take into account and to meet the character of the area, density should be decreased or
the development proposal be moved closer to the core. He added that Desert Mountain
and Cave Creek schools are too far from the development.
Committee member Jill Hankins asked if a flood analysis had been completed for the
site. Susan Demmitt stated that the site is not proposing development in the
established flood corridor or flood zone. Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart
Wilson, stated that the drainage corridors have mapped floodplains and are subject to
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). He added that the developer will
work with the City to appropriately address the flood zones. Committee member Jill
Hankins stated that she had concerns with additional hardscape in the area.
Committee member Michelle Santoro stated that she appreciates the design, open
space, and connectivity proposed by the development.
Daniel Centilli, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve and various trail running
groups, stated that developers see the area as a transportation corridor, but residents
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1056
see it as a recreation corridor. He added that the development will reduce quality of life.
He stated that other residential projects in the area have increased trash and traffic.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, stated that he appreciated the
partnership with the NWF and proposed trails and access. He added that the Desert
Character Overlay is tied to the preserve and should be retained.
Sue Pierce, a resident of Desert Enclave, stated that the area is exploding with
development, especially with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
(TSMC), but residential development will lead to increased traffic. She stated that traffic
issues are already complicated in the area and there is no plan from the development
about how to alleviate the issue. She added that major transportation will lead to
additional noise pollution. She stated that there is an opportunity to preserve the area
as a tranquil space in the Sonoran Preserve.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council,
expressed concerns regarding amending the Desert Character Overlay. She added
that the developer should keep 50% of the land as native and homes should be low
scale. She also expressed concerns with the lack of parking if a trailhead is provided on
site.
James Gaston, a resident of Tuscana at Tatum Ranch, questioned how the
development will deal with increases in water and sewer usage.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that he was opposed to the
development and instead wanted to preserve the area as natural preserve. He also
expressed concerns with traffic and density.
Scott Coll, a member of the public, expressed concerns with traffic. He added that
there is a need to preserve the preserve area.
Crystal Lehman, a member of the public, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is a
pleasant driving experience as is and expanding the roadway and increasing homes
takes away from the beauty of the desert.
Rebecca Rodriguez, a local hiker, trail runner, and mountain biker, stated that she
enjoys the beautiful views and wildlife in the area. She expressed concerns with
increased noise from the roadway.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, stated the
he understands the area will develop eventually, but expressed concerns with density
and traffic. He added that the development should be set back further from Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave stated that Sonoran Desert Drive will increase to 6 lanes,
but that does not mean that the preserve area cannot be preserved. Committee
member Jill Hankins also expressed the need to retain open spaces in the City.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1057
Committee member Rick Powell stated that he believes development should be
slower and the area kept more natural.
Committee member Reginald Younger stated that he likes the look of Sonoran Desert
Drive as is and hopes that development will allow that to be retained. He also
expressed concerns with increased density.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1058
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting April 2, 2019
Request From S-1 DCOD (155.14 acres), S-1 (343.04 acres) and RE-
35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (pending PUD) (165.99 acres) and PUD
(343.04 acres)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, gave a presentation of the case up to this point in time. She
stated that they started this process back in August. Ms. Demmitt went through the
General Plan history of the area, along with the Desert Character Overlay District
establishment. She summarized the infrastructure improvements that would be required
for the subdivision to be built. Ms. Demmitt went on to describe the comments the
developer is receiving from members of the public. The first comment was that the
property should stay S-1. Ms. Demmitt stated that staying S-1 would be one home per
acre. Having a subdivision with multiple sized lots/homes would be more affordable for
residents to live in proximity to the preserve.
The next comment from the public that was addressed is the condition of Sonoran
Desert Drive. Ms. Demmitt stated they are working with the City and the State Land
Department to evaluate. She went on to present pages form the 2002 council report that
indicated that at full capacity, Sonoran Desert Drive will be able to handle 50,000 cars a
day. The road was intended to be a major thoroughfare.
The next concern Ms. Demmitt addressed was the acquisition of Sonoran Preserve
Land. She went on to state that the MacEwen property has been privately held since the
1950’s. Taylor Morrison is agreeable to put a public trail through the center of the
property, adjacent to the wash corridor, to connect the preserve north and south of
Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated they will comply with the Sonoran Edge Treatment
Guidelines. Ms. Demmitt stated the City’s Park and Recreation Department is currently
looking at acquiring the land to the east of the MacEwen parcel for preserve.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1059
Lou Lagrave stated that he understands that Sonoran Desert Drive is intended to be a
six-lane arterial and the General Plan on the southern two-thirds of the property has the
land use designation that supports the proposed density but that he still has concerns.
Mr. Lagrave stated that he is concerned about the traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, how
the kids will get to school and the proposed lot sizes.
Susan Demmitt addressed Mr. Lagrave and stated that they are looking into what they
can do to alleviate some of the concerns regarding Sonoran Desert Drive but the
construction of the southern leg is 47 million dollars. She stated that the kids that live in
this development will have the option of attending either Deer Valley Schools or Cave
Creek Schools. She stated that both school districts will be providing bus service into
the neighborhood.
Jill Hankins asked if the Mesquite Wash is a 404 wash. Susan Demmitt referred to
Nguyen Lam on her development team. Mr. Lam stated they are disturbing less than an
acre and it is not within the 404-protected area. Ms. Hankins asked if there have been
any studies done regarding cultural items or protected species. Mr. Lam stated the
studies have been done and nothing was found.
Doug Dickson stated that the committee has received many emails opposition and not
one in support. Doug Dickson stated that they should talk to State Land about swapping
this parcel for a better suited piece of land. He asked if the applicant had explored this
option. Ms. Demmitt stated that the City hasn’t identified this piece of land as preserve
land, but they have not discussed a swap with State Land.
Steve Bowser stated that the committee has letters in front of them in opposition from
the Sierra Club and PMPC.
Steve Bowser read the cards in opposition that didn’t wish to speak.
The floor was opened for public comment.
Debra Sedillo Dugan, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic and views. She
said the signs were posted where no one could see them until the applicant recently
moved them.
John Furniss, resident, stated he is the Chair of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve
Committee for the Parks and Recreation Department. He said there should be a letter
from their committee to deny this project. He stated that they aren’t opposed to growth,
but this will set precedence and that we need to protect what he have.
Stacie Beute, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She has been a longtime
friend to the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and advises on committees. She said that
Taylor Morrison will be selling the homes with the added amenity of the proximity to the
preserve, but they are developing on the preserve. She stated she is concerned about
the impacts on the environment.
Amanda Farr, resident, stated that Sonoran Desert Drive is currently a safe place to
cycle and run. If this development is approved, it will no longer be safe.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1060
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated that he is a Park Steward for the Phoenix Mountain
Preserve. He stated that he started the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group as an
advocacy group in response to the request. He stated that the proposal isn’t consistent
with the North Land Use Plan and the Desert View Character Plan. Mr. Kirkilas urged
the committee that if it doesn’t make sense, say no to the proposal.
Daniel Centilli, resident, stated that he is a Desert Ridge homeowner. He said the
current DCOD overlay prevents something like this proposal from happening. He stated
that the applicant is asking for exceptions to the law. He went on to state the preserve is
our legacy.
Patrick Havley, resident, thanked the committee. He stated he is concerned for the
safety of cyclists on Sonoran Desert Drive. He also stated this project won’t contribute
to the overall good of the City.
Gannon Burleigh, resident, said that he is opposed and has concerns about traffic,
schools and the impact on the preserve. He said that the project is irresponsible
development and that the removal of the overlay district that protects the preserve is
ridiculous.
Laura Jones, resident, stated she has concerns about the traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated the development should be one acre lots to preserve the wildlife.
Patrick McMullen, resident, states that he is the President of the PMPC. He stated that
the Phoenix Mountain Preserve Council has been around since the 1970’s to preserve
the desert. He stated that PMPC is opposed to the request.
Mandy Fellows, resident, passed out a study from an ASU professor concerning the
ecological impact and flooding concerns in the area. She stated that this area is
downstream from three dams, with the closest dam being 1.5 miles away.
John Trojan, resident, stated he is opposed to the request with concerns about traffic,
pedestrian safety and allowing the developer to craft their own zoning standards.
Lainy Porter, resident, stated she moved to Arizona for pain management. She stated
that she trains for triathlons on Sonoran Desert Drive and is concerned about the
increase in traffic.
Claudia Wagner, resident, stated she is a trail runner and has concerns about the
danger the increased traffic with cause on Sonoran Desert Drive. She is also concerned
about the potential for flooding.
Heather Larson, resident, stated she is concerned about the increase in traffic and
pedestrian safety.
Tim Holt, resident, said that he moved to Phoenix from Seattle. He said this proposal is
just setting precedence and the next development will be even more dense. Mr. Holt
went on to state this project is about money and greed.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1061
Brett Scholar, resident, stated that he uses Sonoran Desert Drive to run and cycle. He
questioned the benefit the applicant will bring to the area. He stated that the property
should stay as it is currently zoned.
Lindsey Tillman, resident, stated she is opposed to the request. She said that the City
needs to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
Susan Beccian, resident, stated that she is one of the only people that have received
letters about this case but didn’t receive one concerning the meeting tonight. She said
she is concerned that Gammage and Burnham isn’t being upfront with the community.
Cassandra Leone, resident, thanked her neighbors for coming out to oppose the zoning
request. She said she is concerned about pedestrian safety and the traffic on Sonoran
Desert Drive. She said she has read the PUD and has concerns about the sustainability
section.
Michelle Kelley, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. She commented
that just because a plan is 30 years old doesn’t mean it’s not a good plan. It means the
community and the planning department were visioning long term. This request doesn’t
comply with the Desert View Character Plan. Ms. Kelley went on to state that the school
is over capacity and there is no real plan from the applicant to resolve that issue. She
closed by stating the area should be preserved and the plans should not be changed.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated that she is opposed to the request. Ms. Pierce went on to
state that this project is going to be a financial burden on taxpayers. Even though the
applicant must pay to extend infrastructure, the taxpayers pay to maintain this
infrastructure that is being extended to only serve this subdivision.
Christine Severance, resident, stated that that the signs for the hearing were posted far
from the road so they couldn’t be read. She stated the applicant purchased the property
with the current zoning and that it shouldn’t be changed.
Karen Severance, resident, stated that the preserve means a lot to her. She urged the
committee to think about the ecosystem when they vote on this case at a later date.
Jennifer Severance, resident, stated that nature needs to have space. The edges of the
preserve are important.
Karl Mar, resident, stated that he is opposed to the request. He said that the
infrastructure can’t handle a development of this size.
Patty Killinger, resident, stated that she has been in the area since the 1970’s. She said
that the parcel’s adjacency to the Sonoran Preserve is important.
Anna Lewandowski, resident, stated she just found out about the project about two
weeks ago and came to the meeting to learn more about it. She said from listening to
the applicant’s presentation and the testimony of the public, it sounds like this
development is 10 years too soon. The current infrastructure and school systems can’t
handle the residents this development will generate.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1062
Mike Rooney, resident, stated this project is political. This development is not consistent
with the Desert View Character Plan.
Patricia Story, resident, stated that she is concerned for public safety in the areas. She
said the area already has an emergency response time issue.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1063
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 6, 2018
Request From S-1 DCOD (155.14 acres), S-1 (343.04 acres) and RE-
35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (pending PUD) (165.99 acres) and PUD
(343.04 acres)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately build
1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan.
Lou Lagrave had questions regarding the alignment of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated
it is a nice development in the wrong location and that there is no justification for the
density. He stated that according to the North Land Use Plan that this area is intended
to be 2 dwelling units per acre or less.
Rick Nowell clarified that the applicant would only be adding one lane in front of their
own development, not the entire length of Sonoran Desert Drive. He stated it is a nice
project in the wrong place. He stated that Sanctuary at Desert Ridge is unsightly and he
doesn’t want to see that in this location.
Rick Powell asked which school district in which the property is located. Ms. Demmitt
said Deer Valley.
Steve Bowser asked how long the land has been privately held. Ms. Demmitt stated
since the 1950’s.
Ryan Schaefer asked if the developer was contributing to the Sonoran Desert Drive
alignment. Ms. Demmitt said the subdivision will be contributing to impact fees.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1064
Jill Hankins expressed concern about the safety of the cyclists on Sonoran Desert
Drive. She stated there needs to be an underpass and islands for the bikers.
Steve Bowser opened the meeting to public comment.
Richard Puleri, resident, stated he has concerns about the current traffic congestion on
Sonoran Desert Drive and inquired on when Sonoran Desert Drive will be expanded
and connected.
Michael Kaciemba, resident, stated he lives in Sonoran Foothills and that he has
concerns about the current traffic congestion. He stated that this project shouldn’t be
improved until the streets are expanded. He also addressed the school doesn’t have
capacity.
Public comment closed.
Reginald Younger said that Taylor Morrison expanded the roads with Sky Crossing.
Rick Powell states he has concerns about the school capacity.
Deanna Chew asked if residents would have a City of Phoenix address. Ms. Demmitt
stated she believes they will.
Rick Nowell asked if a traffic study has been done. Ms. Demmitt says it was recently
completed but has not been submitted to the City yet.
There was a brief committee discussion concerning the possibility of age restriction
subdivisions within the development.
Louis Lagrave stated he believes in land rights but this needs to come back with R1-10
zoning. Louis Lagrave also requested staff send out the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1065
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting December 9, 2021
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #3 – Information Only – GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Item #5 – Information Only – Z-TA-5-18-2, and Item #6 – Information Only – Z-75-18-2.
Committee member Julie Read arrived to the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to 5 members.
3 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve, will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes per
acre, and will have 7 miles of trails and community paths. She discussed the
application requests to rezone to PUD, amend the General Plan, and amend the Desert
Character Overlay District. She also discussed the extension and build out of Sonoran
Desert Drive.
Susan Demmitt also discussed the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife
Federation (NWF). She discussed the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. She noted the NWF landscape palette, pedestrian
circulation, and open edge plan.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon asked about the timeline for constructing Sonoran Desert
Drive. Susan Demmitt stated that the buildout for Sonoran Desert Drive will cost
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1066
approximately $120 million and there is no defined timeline. She stated that the
development will complete a Traffic Impact Study to determine the level of service and
the necessary improvements.
Committee member Michelle Ricart asked whether the applicant reached out to the
school district. Susan Demmitt stated that they are working with the school district on
a donation agreement. She added that there will be no modifications to the boundaries
of the school district and students living in the development will be within the boundary
of Desert Mountain schools.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, expressed concerns with
removal of the Desert Character Overlay. He stated that areas adjacent to preserve
areas should be low density. He also expressed concerns regarding increased traffic.
Paul Grayczyk, president of the Sonoran Gate Home Owner’s Association, encouraged
larger setbacks from Sonoran Desert Drive.
Bob Thompson, a member of the public, stated that the beauty of the area should be
maintained. He added that the developer should honor the Desert Character Overlay
and keep the preserve areas as is.
Susan Demmitt stated that she had no additional comments or responses at this time,
but will continue dialogue with the community going forward.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1067
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 8, 2018
Request From S-1 DCOD (155.14 acres), S-1 (343.04 acres) and RE-
35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (pending PUD) (165.99 acres) and PUD
(343.04 acres)
Proposed Use Single-family Residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Susan Demmitt, applicant, presented the information to the Village regarding MacEwen
480 PUD. She addressed the history of the site and the current requests to ultimately
build 1,420 homes. She addressed that a portion of the 480 acres is within the Desert
Character Overlay District and the North Land Use Plan. She stated they are working
with the Deer Valley School District to come up with a solution to the school capacity
issue. She stated they are looking into the option of Cave Creek Schools.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, expressed several concerns:
- Traffic safety and cyclist safety on Sonoran Desert Drive.
- Public safety response time.
- Elimination of the night sky.
- Density is too high.
He then asked if the applicant has been in communication with the State Land
Department to see when the surrounding land will be opened for auction. Susan
Demmitt stated it won’t be within the next 5 years.
Jason Stokes, VPC member, asked where the closest fire station is located. Ms.
Demmitt stated Cave Creek and Dynamite.
Steve Tucker, VPC member, asked what would happen in the notch. Ms. Demmitt
states most likely residential. Mr. Tucker stated that the road improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive need to happen before development.
Julie Read, VPC member, asked how many homes are approved for Sonoran Gate. Ms.
Demmitt responded 255 homes.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1068
Shannon Simon, VPC member, inquired about the City’s timeline for the complete build
out of Sonoran Desert Drive. She stated the light pollution from Sonoran Gate isn’t as
bad as she thought. Ms. Simon then asked if all the neighborhoods will be gated. Ms.
Demmitt responded that some neighborhoods will be gated.
Julie Read, VPC member, stated she has concerns about the school capacity issue and
the fact that some of the students could be going to Cave Creek Schools. She stated
that a neighborhood elementary school builds a sense of community. Ms. Read asked
what the target market will be for this development. Ms. Demmitt states they are still
trying to identify the target. Julie Read asked how many children there are in Sonoran
Gate. A resident in the audience who lives in Sonoran Gate stated about 1 in 8 homes
have kids.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated that Sonoran Gate has a lot of amenities for kids
so there might not be a lot of kids right now but they can come. She stated she is
concerned with the school capacity. She said that it is at least a 20 to 25-minute drive to
the closest Cave Creek elementary school by car, so it would be even longer by bus.
Susan Demmitt stated that Taylor Morrison is committed to working with the school
districts to find a solution.
Michelle Ricart, VPC member, stated she is concerned about school buses going in and
out of the neighborhood with the traffic and the speeds vehicles travel along Sonoran
Desert Drive. She also stated open enrollment can be deceiving because students can
get kicked out of the school.
The floor was open to public comment.
Michelle Kelly, resident, stated she was opposed to the request. She stated she is
concerned about the density. She stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills, which is lower
in density than the proposed project. She stated that Sonoran Foothills Elementary land
was gifted by the developer. She is concerned about police and fire response times.
She stated the project is too dense without the proper infrastructure in place.
Burt Bragin, resident, voiced his concerns about Sonoran Desert Drive and the current
traffic. He stated the connection to the 303 needs to be made before the project is
approved. He stated Sonoran Foothills has 1,300 homes and a school was gifted by the
developer. He stated this development has 6 to 7 times more homes that Sonoran Gate.
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that Deer Valley Schools doesn’t want a school site at
this location.
Cynthia Wise, resident, stated she is in favor of the request. She said Taylor Morrison
did a great job with the current infrastructure improvements within Sonoran Gate.
Gary Kirkilas, resident, stated he is a park steward for the Apache Wash trailhead. He
stated this development would change the entire character of the area. He then asked
the developer how they will make it look like the preserve.
J.R. Oliver, resident, stated she lives in Sonoran Foothills and has to wait a long time to
get out of her subdivision. She stated the connection to the 303 would help a lot.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1069
Susan Demmitt, applicant, stated that is more of a regional issue and to talk to the City’s
Street Transportation Department.
Sue Pierce, resident, stated she opposes the project and is a resident of Desert
Enclave. She said on the way to the meeting they had to wait until 56 cars went by to
turn out. She stated this development will have an adverse reaction on the desert
wildlife and preserve area. She stated this development is in contradiction of the
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
L. Chicchillo, resident, stated the current Taylor Morrison project looks like row houses.
He stated he lives in Desert Enclave and is worried about the traffic.
Spero Papos, resident, asked if the land had been purchased. The applicant confirmed
it had not been purchased yet. He inquired about traffic lights.
Julie Read, VPC member asked if the applicant has met with ADOT because they
would like to see more information about the project.
There was then a committee discussion about how Dove Valley Road, Cave Creek
Road and 27th Avenue all get flooded out in the monsoon storms.
Tim Mitten, VPC member, stated that the North Gateway minutes will be forwarded onto
the Desert View VPC with their packet so they are aware of the discussion that took
place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1070
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting March 10, 2022
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations, with a modification to
Stipulation No. 1, regarding an updated development
narrative
VPC Vote 4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Z-TA-5-18-2, Item #5 – Z-75-18-2, and
Item #6 – GPA-DSTV-18-2.
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak.
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD). She explained the
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and
Sub-District B. She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave
Creek Wash. Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B. She
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1071
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request. She added that the text
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the
zoning districts. She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area.
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves /
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO). She explained that the IPO acted as a timing
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support
development. She stated that significant investment and development has occurred
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and
reassess development beyond the ILL. She added that staff is recommending approval
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2.
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD. She added
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open
spaces, and a pedestrian network. She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support. She stated that the letters in opposition
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density,
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school
district, and lack of amenities to support the development.
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date. She added
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations.
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1072
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan. She explained
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential. She also
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive. She also
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District.
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have
a unique vision and design approach. He discussed the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans,
and homeowner habitat gardens. He discussed the certified habitat open space areas,
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks,
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities. He also provided an
example of the NWF landscape palette.
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water. He added
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD.
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and
stated that the project was high quality.
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and
discussed the importance of the DCOD. He stated that the DCOD was intended to
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain. He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment
rather than dominate it. He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert
Drive. He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose
of the overlay.
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council,
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the
number of units permitted on the site. He also expressed concerns regarding the width
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash.
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile
corridors in the area. She requested lower density and single-story residences. She
added that DCOD should remain in place.
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the
desert character. She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1073
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development.
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and
southern portions of the Preserve. She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable
for many.
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site. He stated that the
DCOD should be retained. He also expressed concern that the development will be
built with no close connections to services.
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning.
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for
people to live. She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible
housing.
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into
account and worked into the Verdin project. She added that the land adjacent to
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a
precedent for what’s to come.
MOTION: Committee member Daniel Tome made a motion to approve Z-62-18-2,
subject to stipulations and a modification to Stipulation No. 1, regarding an updated
development narrative. The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Shannon Simon.
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and
Chair Stokes in opposition.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
The VPC recommended approval with modification. Per the recommendation, the
stipulations for the case are as follows.
Recommended Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022, as
modified by the following stipulations:
a. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1074
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by
the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
7. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1075
Attachment F
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-62-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting April 5, 2022
Request From S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development,
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Proposed Use Single-family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and
Sonoran Desert Drive
VPC Recommendation Approval, with modifications and additional stipulations
VPC Vote 10-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases Z-TA-5-18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2 were heard
concurrently.
Five requests to speak in favor and five requests to speak in opposition were made for
this request.
Committee member Reginald Younger joined during this item, bringing quorum to 10.
Committee member Jill Hankins joined during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Committee member Mark Warren joined during this item, bringing quorum to 12.
Committee member Reginald Younger left during this item, bringing quorum to 11.
Staff Presentation
Julianna Pierre, staff, provided a combined presentation for companion cases Z-TA-5-
18-2, Z-75-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, and Z-62-18-2. Ms. Pierre reviewed the history of
the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD) and the alignment of Sonoran Desert
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1076
Drive. She explained that staff recommends a more limited area to be removed from the
DOCD, as shown on the map in the staff report. She explained that the Z-75-18-2 case
mirrors the text amendment case, updating the zoning designation to remove the
overlay district, and that staff recommends denial as filed, approval of the staff
recommended area. Ms. Pierre went on to review the General Plan Amendment,
describing the history and purpose of the designations, noting that staff recommends
approval. She then provided an overview of the PUD proposal in Rezoning Case Z-62-
18-2, reviewing the land use proposal and site plan, connectivity proposal, open space
provisions, and amenities. She discussed the community input that has been received
and summarized written materials. Finally, she noted that staff recommends approval
with stipulations.
Applicant Presentation
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, summarized the history of
the site and planning efforts for the proposed project. She stated that the subject site is
private property and has never been designated to be part of a preserve area. She
reviewed the surrounding area, summarized the applicant’s proposal, and discussed
new proposed stipulations that she suggested the committee incorporate into its
approval. She summarized the purpose of the Desert Character Overlay District and
stated that the impact of removing the overlay would allow a master planned community
with density spread to the whole site.
Alex Stedman, representative with RVi, discussed the design approach and
relationship to the surrounding open space, including the partnership with the National
Wildlife Federation. He shared a map that indicated the proposed certified habitat open
spaces within the site, discussed the proposed landscape palette and plant list, and
stated that the Mesquite Wash would serve as a connector between the north and south
portions of the preserve. He reviewed the edge openness plan and the design of open
edges with public trail access points. Finally, he described the elements of the DCOD
that have been incorporated into the design of the development.
Susan Demmitt described the additional stipulations – which include a reduced density
limit, elimination of the smallest lot size, an additional open space buffer along the
eastern property line, public access easements at certain locations, and a multi-use trail
easement along the wash corridor – proposed by the applicant and requested that the
committee incorporate the additional stipulations into their approval. Additionally, she
stated that the subject site has always been designated for development in the City’s
General Plan and the proposed density is within the limits of the designation and that
the applicant hopes to set a good example of appropriate development in this corridor.
Committee Questions
Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the designation of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre in
the General Plan Amendment, which is not necessary to facilitate the proposed project.
He further asked about the southeast corner and if it would make sense to donate the
land to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Susan Demmitt replied that the applicant would be open to removing the General Plan
classification of 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and that the applicant would be willing to
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1077
work with the Parks and Recreation Department on a dedication of the southeast corner
of the site if it was of interest to the City.
Committee Member Nowell asked about the development parcel allocation table in
which the numbers for individual parcels do not add up to the total for the full site. Ms.
Demmitt replied that the individual parcels have flexibility in the unit totals, but the
overall total cannot exceed the maximum for the full site.
Mr. Nowell asked if homeowners would be prohibited from planting non-native plants.
Mr. Stedman replied that individual homeowners would be required to follow the plant
list for the PUD. Committee Member Reynolds added that rear yard plant prohibitions
are possible and are done in other communities, asking further if fruit trees will be
prohibited in the community. Mr. Stedman replied that the applicant team would explore
the idea.
Mr. Nowell asked how many lots would be affected by the base flood elevation and how
much those houses would need to be elevated.
Nguyen Lam, representative with Hilgart Wilson, replied that it would primarily be lots
fronting on the Mesquite Wash, but they don’t have a precise number since the parcels
haven’t been finalized. He added that they would raise the houses to 1 foot above the
base flood elevation.
Ms. Reynolds asked if the natural preservation areas will be marked so the community
knows where they are. Mr. Stedman replied that they have discussed signage with the
NWF and there are opportunities to do signage. Ms. Demmitt added that the applicant
wants the public to recognize that these are public benefits.
Committee Member Kollar asked for clarification on the DCOD removal area. Ms.
Pierre replied that staff is recommending only the Verdin site be removed from the
DCOD at this time and any other sites would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. Ms. Demmitt added that the package of commitments from the specific PUD
justifies the removal of the DCOD.
Mr. Nowell asked for clarification on making motions with amendments. Vice Chair
Lagrave replied that the committee can make the appropriate amendments in their
motions.
Public Comments
Gary Kirkilas introduced himself and provided a history of the DCOD, noting that its
purpose was to maintain the Cave Creek Wash. He stated that the entire Cave Creek
Wash needs to be protected and that the DCOD boundaries should be at the Dynamite
Boulevard alignment, not moved to the north. He further stated that DCOD only applies
to one-third of the property, allowing the developer to build on the site without removing
the DCOD. He stated that he believes the committee should vote yes on development
but keep the DCOD in place.
Donald Bessler introduced himself and stated that he believes this is a property rights
issue and that more housing should be built, adding that he supports the proposal and
believes it will be a good product.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1078
Susanne Rothwell introduced herself and stated that the Desert View Village Planning
Committee voted in favor of the DCOD when it was originally written. She stated that
everyone was in favor of it at the time and it was a great piece of planning and
legislation.
Brian Sullivan introduced himself, noting that he has worked and spent much time in
the preserve area, and stated that there are maps that show this area designated for
acquisition and preservation. He stated that minimizing density would limit the impact to
wildlife and that preserving the flats is important.
Sue Pierce introduced herself and stated the concern that the work that goes into
making plans can be easily reversed by a developer who doesn’t have a full
understanding of the issues.
Kara Nicholls introduced herself and stated that Phoenix needs attainable housing
because of its rapid growth rate. She noted that people are having trouble finding
homes in the area and that the developer has done a great job with the proposed
development.
Jennifer Ruby introduced herself and stated that the proposed development is a great
opportunity for the community and that it would provide housing for all the new jobs
coming to the north Phoenix area.
Cynthia Weiss introduced herself and stated that she supports the proposal because
there are other active families that want to live in this location near all of the open space
amenities.
James Gaston introduced himself and stated that he does not agree with removing the
DCOD and believes one home per acre is appropriate. He further noted that there is
academic research, stating concerns about groundwater issues in regard to
overdevelopment.
Sara Altieri introduced herself and stated that she knew the area would change over
time when she bought a home nearby. She stated that the development incorporates
sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Applicant Response
Susan Demmitt stated that she feels the applicant has addressed the concerns and
would be happy to discuss any follow up questions.
Committee Discussion
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he was originally in favor of the R1-10 designation and
that he is concerned about keeping the DCOD in the northern portion because it would
push more density into the southern portion. He stated that he believes the
development will allow wildlife to flourish and that he supports the project.
Committee Member Israel asked if there is a current allowance for housing on the site.
Vice Chair Lagrave replied that there is.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1079
Committee Member Powell stated that this site is far from the 101 and I-17 freeways
and should be the lowest density. He stated the concern about other sites along the
corridor seeking higher densities, adding that he doesn’t believe the request is in
character and is not in favor of moving the DCOD line. He further stated that the homes
in this development will not be affordable or attainable and that there is room in other
parts of the village that could be developed at higher densities, closer to the freeway.
Committee Member Santoro stated that the PUD is very thorough and thoughtful and
that she appreciates the reduction in density. She stated that she does not agree with
the current alignment of the DCOD line and that the majority of the property is in
alignment with the DCOD guidelines.
Committee Member Nowell stated that he believes the proposal is a good
compromise, even though it is not perfect, adding that he would like to see the approved
plant include particular restrictions in the back yards of individual homes.
Chair Bowser stated that it is important to remember that the proposal is to eliminate
the DCOD at the site in exchange for an entire new set of rules outlined in the PUD. He
further stated that one house per acre is not a desirable type of development, noting the
downsides to one-acre lot development, including that it’s not walkable and people do
not know their neighbors.
Committee Member Hankins stated that she would be in favor of the development if it
were closer to existing infrastructure and that she is concerned about the costs of
infrastructure driving up home prices.
Vice Chair Lagrave stated that affordable housing is typically found in other parts of the
city and that he believes that infrastructure costs will be lower for future developments.
MOTION – Z-62-18-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion for approval with modifications to Stipulation 1,
regarding an updated development narrative, and the following additional stipulations:
1. Modify the Verdin PUD document as necessary to reflect a maximum overall
unit count of 1,250 units and a maximum overall density of 2.6 units per acre.
2. Modify the Verdin PUD document as necessary to remove the Small Lot
(SFR-3) Land Use District.
3. A minimum 25-foot open space tract shall be provided along the eastern
boundary of the Verdin property to provide a transition to the Cave Creek
Wash corridor. The open space tract shall be considered a Certified Area
Type “B” – Natural Revegetated Area with plant materials from the Verdin
PUD Plant List: Green List.
4. The developer shall work with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department to provide public trail access easement for the Mesquite Wash
Corridor Trail and Community Paseo Paths that provide connection to the
Sonoran Preserve as depicted in Exhibit 6, Pedestrian Circulation Plan, in the
PUD document. The public access shall be designed to restrict unauthorized
motor vehicle access, as approved by the parks and recreation department.
The location and design of trail connections shall be coordinated with the City
of Phoenix.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1080
5. A minimum 12-foot wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be constructed within an
average 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the Mesquite
Wash in accordance with Section 429 of the City of Phoenix MAG
Supplemental Details, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
Committee Member Warren seconded the motion.
VOTE
10-1, the motion for approval with modifications and additional stipulations passed;
Members Dean, Hankins, Israel, Kollar, Nowell, Reynolds, Santoro, Warren, Lagrave,
and Bowser in favor; Member Powell against.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
The VPC recommended approval with modifications and additional stipulations. Per
that recommendation, the stipulations for the case are as follows:
Recommended Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022, as
modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY TO
PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR.
THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A CERTIFIED
AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA WITH PLANT
MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST: GREEN LIST.
d. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by
the approved study.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1081
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED IN EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS
SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE
ACCESS, AS APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL CONNECTIONS
SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAILS,
AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
9. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
10. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 1082
Attachment G
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-62-18-2
Verdin PUD
April 26, 2022
North Gateway Village Planning March 10, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Desert View Village Planning April 5, 2022
Committee Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date May 5, 2022
Request From S-1 DCOD (Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert
Character Overlay District) (144.82 acres), S-1
(Ranch or Farm Residence) (333.57 acres),
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence
District, Desert Character Overlay District)
(10.24 acres)
Request To PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (Planned Unit
Development, Desert Character Overlay
District, pending Planned Unit Development)
(155.06 acres), PUD (Planned Unit
Development) (333.57 acres)
Proposed Use Planned Unit Development to allow single-
family residential
Location Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment
and Sonoran Desert Drive
Owner MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Applicant Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Representative Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations
The purpose of this addendum is to revise the staff recommended stipulations, as
requested by the applicant:
• Modification to the maximum number of dwelling units and addition of that
number to the development standards,
• Modifications to the height of primary ornamental entry signs,
• Modifications to the plant palette,
• Addition of public trail access easements for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail
and Community Paseo Paths,
• Requirement for a trail and easement along the Mesquite Wash,
• Addition of a 25-foot-wide open space tract along the eastern boundary of the
property,
Page 1083
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
• Dedication of 16 acres at the southeast corner of the property to the City of
Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department.
Additionally, this addendum provides community correspondence received since the
staff report was published.
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended approval with modifications by a 4-1 vote. The modifications
included revisions to the development name and date stamp in Stipulation No. 1.
During the meeting, discussion occurred regarding the proposal – both support and
concerns – such as compatibility with standards outlined in the Desert Character
Overlay District, density, and guidelines for a development adjacent to the Sonoran
Preserve. Since this meeting, Taylor Morrison has worked with the community to revise
standards in the Development Narrative.
The Desert View VPC heard this request on April 5, 2022, and recommended approval
with modifications and additional stipulations by a 10-1 vote. The modifications included
the following:
• Revisions to the development name and date stamp in Stipulation No. 1,
The additional VPC recommended stipulations included the following:
• Modifications to reflect a maximum overall unit count of 1,250 units and a
maximum overall density of 2.6 units per acre,
• Removal of the Small Lot (SFR-3) land use district,
• Addition of a minimum 25-foot-wide open space tract along the eastern boundary
of the property,
• Addition of public trail access easements for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail
and Community Paseo Paths,
• Requirement for a trail and easement along the Mesquite Wash.
During the meeting, discussion occurred regarding the proposal, specifically noting
protection of Cave Creek Wash, additional housing product, retention of the Desert
Character Overlay District, groundwater issues, and sensitivity to natural wildlife.
Dwelling Units
The applicant has requested to decrease the maximum number of units for the proposal
from 1,420 to 1,250 dwelling units, thus changing the overall density from 3.0 to 2.6
dwelling units per acre. Therefore, staff is recommending that Stipulation Nos. 1.a and
1.b require the maximum unit count and overall density to be updated throughout the
Development Narrative.
Additionally, the dwelling units and development parcel allocation are outlined in Section
4, Regulatory Standards and Land Use Districts, of the Development Narrative.
Stipulation Nos. 1.i and 1.j require the maximum unit count and a footnote referencing
the development parcel allocation table be added to the Single-Family Land Use District
Development Standards table.
Page 1084
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
Land Use Districts
The proposal utilizes land use districts as an alternative to traditional zoning districts.
Each land use district regulates the product type and development standards. After
discussions with the community and VPC, the applicant decided to remove the Single-
Family Residential – Small Lot (SFR-3) district and focus on districts with larger lots.
The SFR-3 district would have accommodated attached and detached single-family
dwellings on minimum 3,000 square foot lots and had the highest density attainable in
the development. Stipulation No. 1.c requires any references to the SFR-3 district to be
removed from the Development Narrative and the applicant will update unit counts and
percentages accordingly.
Signage
The applicant had clarified that the maximum lettering and copy height for the Primary
Ornamental Entry signs is 16 feet to accommodate grading issues and being directly
adjacent to Sonoran Desert Drive, a major arterial that will have a total of 6 lanes in the
future. Stipulation Nos. 1.k and 1.s ensure that the correct height is formalized in the
Development Narrative.
Plant Palette
The Development Narrative contains a plant palette that lists desert plants typically
found in the Sonoran Desert of north Phoenix. The green list includes desert plants
allowed within all areas of the PUD, as well as open space and common areas
immediately adjacent to the edges of the subject site. The yellow list includes Sonoran
Desert native and non-native plants that are representative of southwestern deserts.
The yellow list plants may be used within all areas of the PUD, except for open spaces
and common areas immediately adjacent to the edges of the subject site.
The applicant clarified two modifications to the proposed plant palette: removal of
“Chilopsis Linearis – Desert Willow” from the green list and addition to the yellow list
and removal of “Celtis Reticulata – Netleaf Hackberry” from the yellow list and addition
to the green list. Stipulation Nos. 1.m, 1.n, 1.q, and 1.r formalize the changes to the
plant palette.
The applicant has collaborated with the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) to determine
an appropriate plant palette for the development and the NWF has approved the plant
palette. Stipulation No. 1.e to removes the word “approved” from any refences to the
plant palette. This change will avoid confusion since the plant palette has not been
approved by the City’s Landscape Architect.
Trails, Easements, and Open Space
The development will have a public trail (Mesquite Wash Trail) developed along the
Mesquite Wash Corridor. The Mesquite Wash Trail will be a 12-foot-wide natural
surface multi-use public trail within a 30-foot-wide public multi-use trail easement along
Page 1085
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
the east side of the wash. Stipulation No. 7 formalizes the requirement and ensures
that the trail is accessible to the public and built to Maricopa Association of
Governments (MAG) standards. Additionally, Stipulation No. 1.d ensures that the width
of the multi-use trail easement is revised to 30-feet-wide throughout the Development
Narrative.
After the North Gateway VPC meeting, the applicant negotiated additional modifications
regarding easements and open space along the east side of the site with a member of
the City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Mountain Parks/Preserve Committee.
Public trail access easements will be provided for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail and
Community Paseo Paths that provide connections to the Sonoran Preserve, as depicted
on the Pedestrian Circulation Plan. These easements will ensure public access to the
Preserve and restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access through the subject site to the
Sonoran Preserve. Additionally, determination of the location and design elements of
the trail connections will be coordinated with the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department. Stipulation Nos. 1.g and 1.l formalize these changed in the Development
Narrative. Additionally, Stipulation No. 6 ensures that the trail is accessible to the public
as discussed in the Development Narrative.
The applicant also proposes a minimum 25-foot open space tract along the eastern
boundary of the subject site to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor.
Additionally, the open space tract will be considered a Certified Area Type “B” – Natural
Revegetated Area which will include plant materials from the Plant Palette: Green List.
Stipulation No. 1.p ensure that the open space tract is discussed in the section of the
Development Narrative regarding the Certified Area Type “B”. Stipulation No. 1.o
updates the Certified Area Open Space Types exhibit to show the 25-foot open space
tract.
The applicant also indicated that they are willing to dedicate approximately 16 acres at
the southeast corner of the development to the City’s Parks and Recreation Department
for inclusion into the Sonoran Preserve. Stipulation No. 1.f ensures that language will
be added to the Development Narrative discussing the dedication and Stipulation No. 8
requires the applicant to continue working with the Parks and Recreation Department to
formalize the dedication.
Proposition 207 Waiver
Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in Value
of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by the rezoning
application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require the form be
completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 12.
Page 1086
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
Community Correspondence
Since the staff report was published, staff has received 37 items of correspondence.
The correspondence is attached to this addendum.
Stipulations
Staff recommends approval per the modified stipulations below:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with
the Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022,
as modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES
6, 8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
DENSITY TO 2.6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6,
8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
NUMBER OF UNITS TO 1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY TO
PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR.
THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A CERTIFIED
AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA WITH PLANT
MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST: GREEN LIST.
PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, AND 136: REMOVE
ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL –
SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT COUNTS AND
PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL SHALL BE
UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO
THE WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED
PLANT PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
Page 1087
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123,
SECTION 9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD
LANGUAGE REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16
ACRES ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A
PROVISION FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE
DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN
SPACE.
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO
PATHS, PER STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL
SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL
ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
h Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
d. and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT
DENSITY THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS
FOR THE ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT
REFERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN
SECTION 4.C. (REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE
DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM
UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT
PROHIBITED BY CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY
ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE
ALLOWED…”
l. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC
TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE
THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT
PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR
VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO
THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
Page 1088
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
m. PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS –
DESERT WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO
THE YELLOW LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
n. PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND
ADD IT TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
o. PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT.
UPDATE THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE
TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” –
NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA.
p. PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. EXPLAIN
THAT THE AREA’S PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT
PALETTE GREEN LIST.
q. PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
AND INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON
PAGE 121.
r. PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
INFORMATION REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF
HACKBERRY” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST
ON PAGE 119.
s. PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM
HEIGHT FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING
AND COPY IS 16 FEET…”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by
the approved study.
Page 1089
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT
NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED
BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL
DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS
AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE
EROSION HAZARD SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH
CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION
IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH
TIMING OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON
Page 1090
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-62-18-2
April 26, 2022
BY THE DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT,
AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
9. Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.
Exhibits
Community Correspondence (75 pages)
Verdin PUD Development Narrative date stamped March 3, 2022
Page 1091
From: Don Bessler
To: Julianna Pierre; Joshua Bednarek
Subject: Verdin
Date: Thursday, March 10, 2022 8:12:11 PM
Hello I am a Phoenix resident in the area and I am also a small business owner of a consulting
company P3
from Donald Bessler to Host (privately): 7:22 PM
Systems Management. P3 is the nexus of People - Planet-Profit. P3 understands that
generational solutions reside in understanding the reality of the codependency of these three
perspectives. In my career, I have been responsible for developing critical habitat
management programs including Sonoran Desert Preservation plans, Urban Forestry Plans,
Sustainability Plans and Resiliency Planning. In reviewing the proposal and listening to the
presentations, the consultants and developers have thoughtfully considered the place and the
surroundings. My wife and I are avid users of the trails in the preserve, Sidewinder trail,
Ocotillo.... We have always believed that the area under discussion would become housing;
frankly, as parents of a young man, graduate of ASU and gainfully employed , we are
heartbroken by the reality he faces with home ownership due to a high demand and short
supply. While this product isn't likely to be first home ownership, the domino effect of
residents moving up will free up the housing stock for newer buyers.
from Donald Bessler to Host (privately): 7:22 PM
I want to enter my support for the project.
from Joshua Bednarek to Donald Bessler (privately): 7:28 PM
Thank you, Donald. Would it be possible to send your comments to Julianna Pierre at
julianna.pierre@phoenix.gov? That way we could have your comments for the record.
from Donald Bessler to Host & Presenter: 8:04 PM
please enter my previous comments into the record
--
Donald Bessler, PWLF
President
Page 1092
Page 1093
Page 1094
Page 1095
Page 1096
Page 1097
From: Wiele, Larry
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: North Village Planning Committee Comment
Date: Thursday, March 10, 2022 2:53:36 PM
Julianna
I now understand that these comments were due 48 hours prior to the meeting.
While this comment may not become part of the record, I still would like to express my opinion that
while we may not be able to prevent development on private land adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve,
the Village Planning Committee and the City of Phoenix can and should maintain strict Planning
Guidelines and insist that developers of land within the City of Phoenix follow the planning
guidelines that were established to maintain the desert characteristics and minimize the impacts on
our natural resources.
Thanks
Larry Wiele
2413 W Horsetail Trail
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Page 1098
From: Vashti Supplee
To: Julianna Pierre; Jarod Rogers
Subject: Verdin Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-62-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and GPA-DSTV-1-18- 2)
Date: Friday, March 11, 2022 10:05:55 AM
Hello Julianna- I listened to the presentations at the Gateway Village Planning Committee
meeting March 10th. I have also been in conversation with Alex Stedman concerning the
public trails and edge treatments. I consider the efforts by the Verdin team to be excellent and
I agree with the Staff Recommendation with one addition.
The public access trails are a later addition and will end in a wonderful amenity to Verdin
residents and the general recreation public seeking access to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. A
stipulation should be added to the zoning that specifically designates Mesquite Wash as a
public access corridor through the Verdin project and that designated access points from the
Verdin project to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve will be maintained as public access in
cooperation with the Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department.
Phoenix Parks and Recreation may be able to provide better specific wording. The end
objective is to have the public access trails as a condition of the rezoning. I have copied Jarod
Rogers with Phoenix Parks and Recreation.
Sincerely,
Vashti (Tice) Supplee
918 W. Roosevelt Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
602-380-3722
vsupplee25@gmail.com
Page 1099
From: Adam Stranieri
To: PDD Zoning; Gregory L Harmon; Julianna Pierre
Subject: RE: emplandsd - Form Submission
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 8:14:49 AM
Hi Julianna,
Please see below for correspondence regarding Verdin and the associated cases. Please file
accordingly.
Thank you,
Adam Stranieri, Planner III
Planning & Development Department
Planning Division, Zoning Section
Office: 602-262-7142
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 2:53 PM
To: PDD Development Services
Subject: emplandsd - Form Submission
FROM : Mandy R Fellows
SUBJECT : Verdin Development, Case #'s Z-62-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-TA-5-18, Z75-
18-2
MESSAGE : Hello,
Taylor-Morrison (TM) would have you believe the Desert Character Overlay Sub-Districts A
and B are just "technical Clean-ups" as stated on their website.
As if the City of Phoenix didn't already spend MILLIONS in studies saying specifically how
the area should be developed. They'd like to tell you it was suppose to be amended when the
Sonoran Desert Pkwy alignment was built. If that were the case, why do they need an
amendment to change it then?
Its not a matter of being against development - its a matter of following the rules already set in
place by many years and many dollars used to study this area!
Taylor- Morrison needs to revise their PUD to be in alignment with the Overlays and current
Zoning ordinances, not the other way around! Its going to cost the City millions to run the
infrastructure needed for this development, not to mention DESTROYING miles and miles of
Preserve for this leap-frog development.
TM will tell you that the proposed density of 1,420 in the middle of the desert, a leap-frog
Page 1100
development at that, can only be profitable with those numbers......then clearly they are the
ones trying to fool you. With current housing sales and prices, a developer such as Toll
Brothers would absolutely have no problem developing 1-2 units per acre, selling them at
1.5M and turning a nice profit.
I'm sure this letter will fall on deep pockets and deaf-ears, as we have all been conditioned by
these mega-corporations to only care about profits.
However, the Planning and Developments DUTY is to uphold the years and years of studies,
decisions, and plans that are in place for this area!
In addition, due to the exact location between to major washes and floodplains, I formally
request that FEMA due a study regarding the amount of fill dirt that will be removed and
impacting the designated flood areas. I hope the Planning and Development doesn't put undo
lives in the middle of tragedy when those two low lying bridges get washed out and the
residents have no way to escape, seeing as their access roads are between the two bridges!
Again - lets not talk Units until we've talked about Lives!
Thank you for your attention,
Mandy Fellows
Phoenix Resident since 1991
Email : mandy.fellows12@yahoo.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 6023093226
ADDRESS : 1615 W. Blue Sky Dr.
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85085
Submission ID: 31686fa92d944f1386ba53a11879a0ec
Form Submission On : 3/14/2022 2:52:30 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/pdd
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1101
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 10:07:47 AM
Please add to the public record
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 at 4:45 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Rob Nash-Boulden
SUBJECT : Verdin Rezoning
MESSAGE : Councilman Waring,
I appreciate that you meet your constituents in your district and had the pleasure of meeting
you F2F (at my door) a couple years ago. As you are aware, the Taylor Morrison Verdin
(McEwen 480) rezoning recently received staff approval from the Desert Village Planning
Commission - with stipulations. As a resident of Tatum Ranch since 2005 and of North
Phoenix since 1977, I know that this area will and can be developed. What I don't understand
is why the portion of the property in the Desert Overlay Character District Area A should be
rezoned to allow additional density near the Cave Creek Wash corridor on the upper 1/3 of
their property. This developer has made some great improvements to their plan since I first
viewed it a couple of years ago and has an amazing rezoning attorney making their case.
Watching and providing constructive input at the DVPC meetings these past couple of years, I
have watched with awe as Susan Demming has been able to create consensus among the
committee by removing walls, tweaking some landscaping elements, adding a butterfly
garden, and consulting with wildlife associations. Creation of walking paths, connectors to
future developments, and paying toward future intersection improvements are all appreciated
but really table stake gestures.
With all the feel-good items, momentum, and rock-star legal representation TM has, it will
take a lot of leadership to reverse this trend and say "enough"!
This property should be developed with the zoning that is in place to preserve the Desert
Character Overlay District and maintain the densities as planned for this part of their parcel.
This rezoning to 2-5 homes per acre along with the Developer's statement that they will have
attached single family, multi-story, and lots as small as 3000 SF. While the averages on their
whole property won't be terrible, there will be some pretty dense development that just doesn't
align with the zoning or the character of the area.
When I think about this property as a first (or second counting Sonoran Gate) in the area, I
worry that this rezoning creates a precedent that can later be used to apply to the other State
Land properties along this corridor. This property is also very much an "island" today. While
it will likely eventually connect to other developments, the connections from that development
today to the State Land will be a web of spider trails and open borders. Inevitably, citizens are
going to cross at Mesquite Wash and Paseo trying to get to the Apache Wash trailhead area.
Page 1102
Motorized vehicles are more likely to use this as a place to access the flood control areas and
other areas given the open borders of the planned Verdin community. I can easily see where
posted "no trespassing / State Land" signs are disregarded, and the adjacent flora and fauna
destroyed. We cannot prevent this damage to the desert but having fewer homes will help.
Those that zoned this area knew development would come and gave us a playbook for how it
should look. Maintaining the zoning on the upper portion will send the right message to the
future development plans and prevent those who by right will look for up to 5 homes per acre
while protecting the Cave Creek Wash area that was so thoughtfully included in the Desert
Character Overlay District.
I urge you to please consider this input when you are asked to vote on this request.
Regards,
Rob
Email : rob@totalitsolutions.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 722-2677
ADDRESS : 29210 N 50th Place
CITY : Cave Creek
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85331
Submission ID: 1be06d2c527d4b55a11dd07846afa465
Form Submission On : 3/14/2022 4:45:17 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1103
Page 1104
Page 1105
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 8:49:34 AM
Please add to the public record
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 8:47 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Camille proietti
SUBJECT : development Verdin community in N Phoenix near Sonoran Desert Preserve
MESSAGE : If you are at all interested in what your constituents consider important in their
lives, you will pay special attention to the plans for Verdin in N Phoenix. There is absolutely
no excuse to be building/changing the desert character overlay. There are millions of acres
available that would not disrupt such a beautiful area in N Phoenix. Again, there is NO
EXCUSE. It has been shown over and over again, that where cities categorically enhance
resident life with access to nature trails and recreational areas, are considered one of the key
criteria for high desirability. So continuing to take these areas and developing without keeping
this in mind will make Phoenix a LESS DESIRABLE area to live in. And oh, BTW, water,
water, water. Just keep building, because Arizona (specifically Phoenix) has unlimited water
supply.
Email : camillepro1006@aol.com
AREA : 845
PHONE : 6299139
ADDRESS : 29322 N 24 Lane
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85085
Submission ID: 353024d685f34e8a8e0d6e5261dd6c14
Form Submission On : 3/16/2022 8:47:31 AM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.
Page 1106
From: Cynthia Weiss
To: Jim Waring; council.district2@phoenix.gov
Cc: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Message of support - Verdin Development
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 6:11:19 PM
Attachments: PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Councilman Waring,
As you know, I live in Sonoran Gate, the closest community to the proposed Verdin development that is
currently under review and consideration. Ron and I have lived in this area of North Phoenix over 25 years.
Our family knows all the trails of both North and South Preserves as we are avid hikers and mountain
bikers. We were hiking and biking the primitive trails long before Sonoran Desert Drive was built, and
before much of the land was purchased and preserved by the City of Phoenix.
I must admit when my own community, Sonoran Gate began to form on the desert floor between the North
and South Sonoran Preserves (see below), I was certainly not a fan. I would watch from the top of
Ridgeback on one of my favorite hikes as Sonoran Gate started to take shape, week by week… and again, I
was not happy with what was happening to this pristine pocket of North Phoenix.
Sonoran Gate from Ridgeback mountain, May 21, 2016
Then one evening in 2018, I will never forget, I was scheduled to meet a friend at the Apache Wash
Trailhead for a hike. When I called her to confirm, she told me, “We’re not hiking tonight, come meet me at
the models by the trailhead.”
And so I did. I went home that night with three words for my husband… “Honey, we’re moving.” And that
was it. We’ve been living in Sonoran Gate going on 4 years and we could not be happier.
Once I saw the community of Sonoran Gate with my own two eyes, I changed from a person angry about
the project to one that was eager to volunteer to live in what I consider to be one of the most beautiful
places on Earth. We are truly blessed to be living in Sonoran Gate, and blessed by the people with the vision
and talent that have made that possible.
I appreciate all the planning and civil engineering that allows me to live where I do. I appreciate all my
neighbors in Sonoran Gate, even the scorpions, coyotes and rattlesnakes.
I support this rezoning and the Verdin project beause I can clearly see the thought and care that has gone
into it. I believe there are other families like ours that dream of living within walking distance of hundreds
of miles of preserved hiking and biking trails. The Verdin project will help make that happen for hundreds
of families who call Phoenix home.
If forced to stay at the current “one dwelling per acre zoning,” any home built will be considered estate-
sized and thus only available to the extremely wealthy and/or retired, thus blocking young families with
children from living in the area. That would be a tragedy. To put a little dig on our neighbor city, that would
be “SO North Scottsdale.”
It would be difficult for anyone to thank Taylor Morrison and their team for wanting to develop these 480
Page 1107
acres. Any development in the area will mark a time of change many of us are not ready to accept, just as I
was not ready to accept Sonoran Gate as it was being developed.
I do want to thank the City of Phoenix for saving the Sonoran North and South Preserves in the first place.
Things could look much different in the area today, and public access to the now preserved areas would be
much different had poor decisions been made decades ago.
I will thank Taylor Morrison and their team for the thoughtfulness of this plan, especially for NOT
proposing a golf course in this environmentally sensitive area.
Thanks, Councilman Waring, for considering a plan that includes families, children the environment and
community. It’s a good plan, and a uniquely Phoenix plan we can stand behind.
Sincerely,
Cynthia Weiss
Page 1108
Page 1109
Page 1110
Page 1111
Page 1112
From: Don Bessler
To: Jim Waring; Julianna Pierre; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin Development
Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 10:44:05 AM
Hello;
I am a resident of Phoenix and live in your Council District near the area currently under
consideration for development "Verdin" (for a Taylor Morrison Community. I am the
President of a firm P3 Systems Management which was created to help entities find the sweet
spot between People - Profit - Planet. In addition, I spent my entire professional
career working for municipalities as a Parks and Public Works Professional. In those roles I
was responsible for the stewardship of significant city infrastructure systems and public
property including sensitive Sonoran habitat. I am familiar with community General Plans,
Resource Management Plans, including programs like Urban forestry Programs, Urban Heat
Planning, Resiliency & Sustainability planning and programming. My wife and I use the
Phoenix Preserve often, including Apache Wash and Sidewinder Trail area. I have seen the
Planning signage up for several years and we assumed that it would become housing.
I wanted to register my support for the project that is being proposed. Given my professional
background, you might imagine that I have seen hundreds of development proposals over my
many years of service; the amount of care and thoughtfulness that has been brought to bear by
the developer and property owner is vastly superior to many that I have seen. Their
understanding of the place and context is solid, their desire to work collaboratively, beyond
meeting minimum requirements is exceptional. As parents of a young working professional,
(graduate of ASU) we are disheartened by the lack of housing ownership options that are
available for first time home buyers. Adding to the housing mix, with reasonable density
residential will only help his prospects. Cities and communities that truly understand
conservation should accept density within scale; environmentally, it certainly beats the
alternative. We are seeing an exodus of our finest and brightest leaving the valley to
communities that have better housing options. I believe that this will become even more
evident over time as remote working becomes a staple of our economic future. Again, as
parents and residents, this would be the worst for us. Being able to live where you grew up
should be a practical option for our young people.
Thank you for taking the time to consider my viewpoint.
Sincerely
don
Donald Bessler, PWLF
President
Page 1113
From: Leigh Penny
To: Jim Waring; Council District 2 PCC; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin Project
Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 10:42:46 AM
I am a resident of the North Phoenix area and regularly use and benefit from the Sonoran
Preserve. I support the Verdin project. It’s my understanding that the Verdin property is
private property and has been planned for residential development for decades. Although it’s
not part of the City of Phoenix preserve area, the developers have gone to significant lengths
to make sure that Verdin fits in with the surrounding desert context. I support the developer’s
plans for preservation of washes, wildlife corridors and natural open space area. I am excited
by the public trails that will be created and which are a benefit to the entire community. I also
appreciate the developer’s partnership with the National Wildlife Federation. The desert is a
beautiful place, and this thoughtful development will allow private property to be developed,
but is also sensitive to its surroundings. Thank you!
Leigh Penny
Page 1114
From: Kara Nicholls
To: Jim Waring; Julianna Pierre; Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin Rezoning Request
Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 11:26:38 AM
To whom it may concern -
I am writing to show my support for the Taylor Morrison project Verdin. After attending the
public meeting, where I did take the opportunity to speak. I want to reaffirm my support of
the project. Not only do I live near to the north side of the preserve but I am a founding and
current board member of the Desert Foothills Mountain Bike Association (DFMBA) and the
founder of the Cactus Shadows High School Mountain Bike Team. My family has been using
the trails where the preserve is today for over 15 years. The preserve has also been critical to
our efforts to "get more kids on bikes." It is no surprise that one of the things the kids like is
an occasional glimpse of the wildlife whether it be a rattlesnake, a tarantula, a gila monster or
a fox.
As a director of DFMBA, my family has spent countless hours working with the land
managers to ensure access, perform appropriate trail maintenance and educate the mountain
bike community about trail courtesy.
My commitment to preserving open space for the public benefit is shown through my long
commitment and the hands-on work I have done.
However as important as open space is to our community, I am concerned about the lack of
housing available in Maricopa County. As the county rapidly expands it is important for the
government to support available housing by allowing for that housing to be built. It is no
secret that our supply of housing does not meet the demand causing the price of both rents and
housing to become less and less affordable. Local real estate economists, The Cromford
Report and Elliot Pollack, cite lack of Housing as being a key driver in the fast pace of rising
housing prices. Maintaining the zoning to 1 acre per dwelling will not do enough to provide
the area with adequate housing. While I understand this development alone will not alleviate
the housing shortfall on its own, the City of Phoenix has a responsibility to balance the current
need for housing with this minor requests for rezoning to a somewhat higher density.
I understand and support the need to preserve the natural habitat and corridors for wildlife. I
want that for the community and my own friends and family. I believe Taylor Morrsion has
thoughtfully planned the community to allow for both the community to exist alongside the
preserve and wildlife corridors. I am very excited to access the south side of the preserve from
a connected trail with the north.
Sincerely,
--
Kara Nicholls
480 246 1605
Page 1115
From: S. Altieri
To: Jim Waring; Council District 2 PCC; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin Development
Date: Thursday, March 24, 2022 10:43:41 AM
Dear Jim Waring and Julianna Pierre,
As a Desert Peak resident, I have researched the proposed, single-family, master-planned
community, Verdin, and am providing a statement of support.
We have resided in the Desert Peak community since 2018. The primary reason we selected this
community is its proximity to the Apache Wash Trailhead and other recreational areas that are
within a short drive from home. We use the trails most weekends, volunteer as City of Phoenix Park
Stewards, and we have become loyal customers of the businesses that require traveling to and
through the scenic areas that surround Desert Peak, allowing us to enjoy a beautiful, desert drive
while running errands. We could not imagine living in any other community in the Phoenix
Metropolitan Area…until we learned about Verdin.
The area surrounding Desert Peak has changed dramatically since 2018, and with the rapid and
ongoing population growth and increasing number of employment opportunities nearby, there is a
need to offer housing options to support the growth. For the Valley to continue to be a destination
for homeowners and employers, challenges with limited housing options will need to be addressed.
When we moved to the area, we recognized that changes would occur. Verdin will not only lend to
providing housing options, but as a homeowner to future communities that will become neighbors
to Desert Peak, I welcome a neighboring development like Verdin that celebrates the characteristics
of the desert environment. Verdin intends to integrate public trail corridors, view corridors, paseos
and edge open area spaces. The approach to the development incorporates sensitivity to the native
plants, wildlife, landforms and climate. Over seven miles of community paths and trails will
encourage community members and visitors to enjoy the outdoors and cherish the desert
environment as part of their daily lives. Plans for the development also include following design
guidelines for Verdin to become a National Wildlife Federation Certified Community. As an individual
with heightened interest in wildlife protection, this is among the most admirable of the features of
Verdin.
Although we love our Desert Peak community and have no intentions of moving, as homeowners,
we are now envisioning a future community that aligns precisely with the values that we uphold.
Verdin celebrates all that we appreciate about the area and look forward to seeing this development
progress to completion.
Warm Regards,
Sara Altieri
Page 1116
From: David George
To: Jim Waring; Council District 2 PCC; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 11:47:29 AM
Please accept this letter as a statement of support for Taylor Morrison’s Verdin project along
Sonoran Desert Drive.
I live in the Sonoran Gate community, which was also built by Taylor Morrison and is the closest
residential subdivision to the Verdin project. I have met with the development team to learn about
the project. I welcome another Taylor Morrison community to the area as I have enjoyed my home
and community. Additionally, although Taylor Morrison is proposing additional homes in the area,
they are also proposing significant roadway investments that benefit the larger community.
I would like to see the Verdin project approved as I know from personal experience the quality that
Taylor Morrison will bring with this development and the associated roadway improvements. Please
distributed this email to the members of the North Gateway Village and Desert View Village.
Thank you,
David George
31311 N 1st Place
Phoenix AZ 85085
Electronic File Disclaimer: This e-mail and any attachments may contain privileged and
confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this
correspondence in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and permanently
delete this message and any attachments from your computer.
Page 1117
Page 1118
From: Jane penny
To: Julianna Pierre; Council District 2 PCC; Jim Waring
Subject: Verdin project
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 10:40:13 AM
We are writing this letter to voice our support for the new Taylor Morrison project on Sonoran Parkway.
We live in the Sonoran Gate Community, also built by Taylor Morrison and the closest subdivision to the Verdin
project. We love our home and our community, and we are impressed with the thoughtful treatment of the desert
surroundings. After looking at the proposed project we feel Verdin will set the bar for any future development in
our beautiful desert.
Bill and Jane Penny
Sent from my iPad
Page 1119
From: Vashti Supplee
To: Steve Bowser; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin Project
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 10:08:07 AM
Hello Steve and Julianna-
I am writing as myself and I am not representing any entity. I have been keenly interested in
public trail connectivity for the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve north and south of Sonoran Desert
Parkway. I have had the opportunity to meet with Alex Stedman, planner for the Verdin
project. I made some suggestions to improve the project in terms of edge protections on the
east adjacent to Cave Creek Wash and public access. The Verdin team has largely adopted
these suggestions
I am unable to attend the upcoming Village Planning meeting on April 4th and I have the
following comments for the record.
The Verdin project team has been very responsive to suggestions that will contribute to the
desert character of the development, including a 25 foot natural area buffer on the east edge of
the property adjacent to Cave Creek. There will be public access along Mesquite Wash and
through the pedestrian Paseos to Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation Area
land.
I support the following stipulations as part of PUD approval:
STIP #1: Public trail access easements, as approved by the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department, shall be provided for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail, and the Community Paseo
Paths that provide a connection to future trail connections to the Sonoran Preserve as identified
on the Verdin Pedestrian Circulation plan dated June 3, 2019 included within the Verdin PUD, to
ensure permanent public access through the Verdin community to the Sonoran Preserve. The
public access shall be designed in a way to restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access, as
approved by Parks. The specific location, design and timing of construction of the public trail
connections shall be coordinated with and approved by the Parks and Recreation Department.
STIP #2: A minimum 25 foot open space tract shall be provided along the eastern boundary of
the Verdin property to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor. The open space
tract shall be considered a Certified Area Type “B” – Natural Revegetated Area with plant
material from the Approved Plant List: Green List.
Yours in Conservation,
Vashti "Tice" Supplee
918 W. Roosevelt Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
vsupplee25@gmail.com
Page 1120
Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: April 5 Desert View Village Planning Committee
From:Wiele,Larry
Sent:Thursday,March31,20222:38PM
To:AnthonyMGrande
Subject:April5DesertViewVillagePlanningCommittee
Anthony
IamaresidentoftheSonoranFoothillsdevelopment,locatedjusttothewestoftheareathatisbeingproposedfor
rezoningandchangestotherequirementsthatwouldberequiredfordevelopment.
WhileIunderstandthatthisareaisprivatelyowned,andissubjecttodevelopment,Iwanttoencourageyoutonot
changethezoningrequirementsorreducethedesertcharacterthathasbeenintendedforthisarea.These
requirementshavebeeninplaceformanyyears,andtheownersofthelandhavebeenawareofthese
requirements.Theserequirementsareforthegoodofthecommunityasthewhole,whilereducingtheserequirements
benefitsonlytheownersofthisland,andinfactincreasingthenumberofhomesinthisareawillhaveanegativeimpact
onthecurrentresidentsinthisarea.
IrequesttheDesertViewPlanningCommitteemembersvoteagainsttheitemsontheApril5PlanningCommittee
Agenda.
LarryWiele
2413WHorsetailTrail
Phoenix,AZ85085
Page 1121
From: James G. Gaston II
To: PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com; Joshua Bednarek; Julianna Pierre
Subject: Verdin/McEwan 480 Project
Date: Friday, April 1, 2022 2:47:24 PM
As a local resident, I am against any realignment/zoning amendment of Phoenix’s Master Plan
for the Sonoran Preserve as it relates to Taylor Morrison’s request for the Verdin/McEwan 480
Project, Z-62-18-2. Key objection elements of the amendment include:
1. Remove the Desert Character Overlay requirement
2. Build homes outside of existing infrastructure
3. Massive up zone, 3–5 houses per acre
The developer is seeking to transform the Desert Character Overlay around the Preserve.
Moving it north of Sonoran Desert Drive is actually removing it because north of Sonoran
Desert Drive is the Preserve itself.
Regardless of previous statements, if all Plan Amendments proposed are passed, the
development will not be “truly unique.” Nor will it be as the developer committed, “ . . . a
context-sensitive community that sets the bar high for any future development in the area.”
It seems all the developer sees is growth, not thoughtful development, or sustainability. This
Plan Amendment only benefits the developer and not the community or the Preserve.
I am not a “recreational activist,” as cited on a recent local newscast. My objections seek to:
a. Maintain the Master Plan as originally proposed
b. Recognize the dismal condition of the Valley’s current and future water supply
c. Maintain the overlay as the effective way to control development in the entire Preserve
area
James Gaston
Cave Creek, Arizona
Page 1122
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Taylor Morrison Development North Gateway, Sonoran Preserve
Date: Friday, April 1, 2022 5:19:55 PM
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
-----Original Message-----
From: Jill Hoffman
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 4:55 PM
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Cc: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Taylor Morrison Development North Gateway, Sonoran Preserve
I was saddened to hear of the committee vote of 4-1 to allow all of Taylor Morrison’s requests in changing the
zoning and the North Gateway overlay previously planned. I was hoping that the density would not change, but at
the very least they would keep the desert character overlay that all the other neighborhoods in the area adhere to, per
city of Phoenix. I’m also very worried about the infrastructure in place now, will not support any more population,
not to mention the lack of schools in the area. My youngest will finish high school next year, but the overcrowding
in our schools in the North Gateway neighborhoods is horrible. We are not sending our kids to Barry Goldwater
because there is “room", and I assure you Boulder Creek does not have the room for the added population. That
school has a hard enough time getting teachers to drive so far north for the students they have now. The approval of
all things building, is not making an ideal neighborhood. The fact that 7 new apartment complexes are coming to
North Gateway, 5 of them in one area, proves you are not looking out for the interests of the current residents.
Schools and roads are not in place. These builders need to pay for the upgraded infrastructure and schools, just like
50% Norterra Canyon was paid for by the builder. Sonoran Foothills School came 8 years after promised, and has
been over capacity since the 3rd year it was open. The saddest part, is you are allowing a desert jewel you have been
entrusted with, to turn into urban sprawl. Along the I-17 corridor is where building was planned 30+ years ago, not
Phoenix’s beautiful Sonoran Preserve. We can never get it back. It takes a strong person to stand up for the land, be
that person for the generations to come.
Jill Hoffman
North Gateway resident since 2005
Page 1123
From: Christine M Pedersen
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Save Our Sonoran Preserve - Rezone Proposal
Date: Monday, April 4, 2022 3:17:08 PM
Good Afternoon Julianna,
Please see below.
Thank you,
Christine
From: Sonoran Preserve
Sent: Saturday, April 2, 2022 1:28:02 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve - Rezone Proposal
Dear Councilmember Waring,
Recently I wrote to you about a test mailing Save Our Sonoran Preserve was doing to gage public
support for retaining the Desert Character Overlay District. The mailing was made to a sampling of
400 of the nearly 12,000 voters living near the Preserve. The test area is highlighted green in the
map posted at: https://app.box.com/s/bnui5b5w5ufyqidem2mmwfg0jofh1c6f [app.box.com].
I am pleased to report that the test mailing is showing an unusually high degree of deeply felt
support for the Sonoran Preserve among nearby voters.
We mailed the letter at the following link to 400 registered voters, half of which were Republican
and half Democrat: https://app.box.com/s/3wp1f022c56vu1j566ph0kdcmcbztdh8 [app.box.com].
The mailing to 400 voters has thus far generated 118 signatures of the petition
at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve [surveymonkey.com].
A map showing the location where supporters live is
at: https://app.box.com/s/t0am8a0717ksk0o1sdalrgdc19zhlcdk [app.box.com]. As you’ll see support
is coming from voters living up to four miles from the Sonoran Preserve. And support is about equal
from Republicans and Democrats.
Nearly all of the petition signers provided the reasons for why they want the Sonoran Preserve
safeguards of the Desert Character Overlay District retained. These reasons can be viewed
at: https://app.box.com/s/405n9bnddchkl92qj29j1x1m0yx8xhun [app.box.com].
We anticipate that this test mailing will eventually result in a total of 150- to 200-petition signers.
Suffice to say, this test indicates a high degree of support among area voters for your efforts to
Page 1124
safeguard the Sonoran Preserve. I suspect though that supporters may be open to modifying the
areas in the bottom 2/3 of the Verdin property while keeping Desert Character Overlay in the top
1/3 so as to create a win-win compromise for both parties.
We are now planning a second survey mailing to 6,000 of the 12,000 nearby voters. Once we have
these results we will again share our results with you. Thank you again for working and meeting with
us this important issue.
Respectfully,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
708-369-4566
*******
Page 1125
Page 1126
SAVE OUR SONORAN PRESERVE
Dr. Gary Kirkilas, Chair (708) 369-4566
21001 N Tatum Blvd STE 1630-238 saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Phoenix, Arizona 85050 supportpubliclands.com/arizona/save-our-sonoran-preserve
March 8, 2022
«FirstName» «LastName»
«Address»
«City», Arizona «Zip»
Dear «MrMs» «LastName»:
I understand that you, like me, live in the vicinity of the Sonoran
Desert Preserve shown in the map on the other side of this letter. I
assume that you, like me, treasure living near this fantastic natural area
and the opportunities afforded for hiking, biking, or just a pleasant drive
along Sonoran Desert Drive. If this is true then please consider signing
the petition at the following address: ceds.org/sosp or scan the QR code
to the right with your phone or tablet camera then tap open
‘surveymonkey.com’. Every signature we get goes a long way.
At issue is a proposal to double or triple the number of housing units that can be built on
the Verdin site (see map). Development in this area is guided by the Desert Character Overlay
District which allows growth but with a number of measures to safeguard those Sonoran Desert
Preserve values we treasure.
The Verdin development company has asked the Phoenix City Council to ignore the
Desert Character Overlay District. If granted, Sonoran Desert Drive traffic volume could go
from 8,300- to more than 20,000-trips/day from this one development. Other potential growth
along this corridor could raise Sonoran Desert Drive traffic to nearly 50,000 trips/day or more!
Sonoran Desert Drive traffic volume is already at a point where additional bike safety
measures are needed. While there are proposals to add these measures, there is a point where
traffic volume becomes so great that cycling or just walking is no longer enjoyable.
Doubling to tripling the number of nearby homes would detract from the true wilderness
essence of the Preserve. Additionally, abandoning the Desert Character Overlay District is like
turning our back on the beloved Sonoran Preserve - eliminating the protections that were
thoughtfully placed to maintain the uniqueness and beauty as well as ensure maximum
conservation of the incredible ecosystems while allowing a reasonable amount of development.
It is for these reasons that I ask you to sign the Save Our Sonoran Preserve petition
urging Jim Waring and other Phoenix City Council members to require that Verdin and other
development fully comply with the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards.
Over, pleaseÆ
Page 1127
Please contact me at saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com or (708) 369-4566 if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas, Chair
Page 1128
Page 1129
Reasons Provided By Phoenix Residents for Why They Signed the
Save Our Sonoran Preserve Petition at:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
WeneedtodoeverythingwecantoprotecttheSonoranDesertPreserve.Thereshouldn’tbelotsofhomes
there.We’vealreadytakensomuchofthenaturalhabitatanddevelopedit.Weneedtoleavelargechunks
alonesothatthoseanimalsthatliveinthedeserthaveaplace.Ilovehavingthewildernessnearbyand
untouched.Increasingthenumberofhomesnearthepreserveisaskingfortroubleanddisplacingsomanyof
thedesertanimals.Iboughtoutheretobeclosetonaturenottobringthedowntowntraffichere.
Trafficonthepreserveroadisalreadyquitebusyduringrushhour.Addingmorehomeswillincreasethedanger
oftheroadanddamagethebeautifuldesert.
IlovedrivingontheSonoraDesertDr.andseeingourbeautifuldesert.Iandmyfamilymembersalsoenjoy
hikingandbikingonthetrails.
Ihavelivedinthisareaforover16yearsandamanativeArizonan.TheCityhasdoneawonderfuljobon
SonoranDesertDrive,intermsofincorporatingareastorecreateandenjoytheunbelievabledesertscenery
withintheSonoranPreserve.Ihavehikedtheareaandmarvelatthebeauty.Increasingtheplannedhousing
unitsbymultiplesoftwoorthreewillsignificantlydetractfromthearea'sbeautyandtranquilityandaddan
unsustainableamountoftrafficandintroduceecologicaldamagetothearea.Thereisareasonsomuchland
wasdesignatedasapreserveallthoseyearsago.Itshouldstaythatway.
ThePhoenixSonoranPreserveisoneofthefinestusesoftaxpayerdollars.Theabilitytohikeandmountainbike
onmilesandmilesoftrailsisoneofmyfavoritepartsoflivinginNorthPhoenix.Wearealreadyinundatedwith
apartmentcomplexesandhomedevelopmentswithplentyofinventory.Plus,thereisplentyoflandavailable
fordeveloperstobuildonthatwon’twreckoneofthebestthingsthattheCityofPhoenixhasdoneinthepast
coupledecades.
Theinfrastructureisnotsetupforadevelopmentofthissizeandthetaxpayersshouldn’tbearthecostto
Idrivethisroadregularlyandit’salreadygettingoverpopulatedwithtrafficwiththecurrentdevelopment.
MorehousingandconstructionwilltakeawaythenaturalbeautyoftheSonorandesertpreserveandwillalso
increaseunwantedtraffic.
Weliveinthearea,havehikedthesetrails,ourtwoboysattendednearbyCCUSDHorseshoeTrailselementary
school,andI’dsaythatingeneralwehaveastrongdesiretoactasgoodstewardsofthislandandtherefore
haveavestedinterestinmaintainingthebeautyoftheSonorandesertpreserveandourbalancewithnature.
Thiscityisgrowingsofast&weneedtopreservesomeofthebeautifuldesertlandscape.Ifwekeepbuilding
morehouses,wewillhavenothingleft.Wedon’tneedmorehouses!!
Wedonotwantthisnewdevelopmentbecausewelovethenaturaldesertwechosetolivenear.Inaddition,we
doneedtheexcessiveamountoftrafficthatsuchadevelopmentwouldcause.
AsaresidentofanearbycommunityIamconcernedthatthetrafficthatwillbegeneratedbytheproposed
Verdincommunitywillpresentmanysafetyconcerns.ThePreserveprovidesatranquilenvironmentthatwill
mostlikelychangedramaticallyincharacterifthisdenselypopulatedcommunityisbuilt.Idon’tmindsome
buildingalongtheroutebutonlyifitisnotpopulatedasdenselyassomeofthesurroundingdevelopments.
Ourhousebacksuptothedesert.Weboughtthathousebecauseitbacksuptothedesert,Iwanttotokeepour
viewandourslowersimplelifestylethereandnotturnitsintoabigcityfeel.
Wouldcauseanoverpopulatedareathatismeanttobepreservedfornature.Wouldruinhikingandbikingdoto
theamountoftrafficandwouldbecomedangerous.Wouldeffecttheviewsandtheabilityforpeopleenjoythe
scenery.Wouldalsoeffectthewildlifepushingthecoyotesandjavelinasintoresidentialareas.Whichthey
belonginthedesert.
Thiswouldcausepollutiondustnoiseandwouldbeharmfultoourhealth
Page 1130
Thereisnoneedforadditionalhousinginourareaspecificallysonearaprotectedpreserve.Thereisnotenough
watersosupporttheadditionalhomesandbusinessesthatcomewithadevelopmentsuchasthis.
Naturalbeautyalongwithreducednoise,trafficandnightlights.
WeliveintheSonoranGatecommunity.I’malsoacyclist.Wemovedheretoescapecongestionandenjoythe
outdoors.Allofthatisthreatenedwiththiscurrentbuildingfrenzy.Whywouldweabandontheexpresspurpose
ofthesePreserves,socarefullyplannedanduniquelyexecuted?!Andwherearewefindingasustainablewater
supplyforthisunbridleddevelopment?Thisismadness.
Nowantinganymorehomedelveloperstearingupthepreserves.WiththeadditionalVerizonzonesitethere
willbetomanydangerousEMF’sinthecommunity
ThebeautyoftheSonoranPreservewillbereplacedwithurbanarea????Duringthehikeorbikeridearewe
supposedtoadmirethehouses???
TjhisisthelaststripofSonoranDesertleftinPhoenix.I'msorrythepreservedoesn'tborderDoveValley.Whats
doneisgonedonotmakeitworseby3Xthenumberofpeople
Noneedformoredevelopmenteatingupourdesert.
IamveryconcernedabouttheadditionaltrafficvolumethatwillbearesultoflargeVerdincommunity.Iama
triathletewhousesSonoranDesertDr.dailyfortrainingandwiththeincreasedtrafficIfearformysafety.In
addition,wemovedtothisarea(85085)forthebeautyofthedesert.AbandoningtheDesertCharacterOverlay
Districtwilleliminatetheprotectionsthatwereplacedtoensureconservationoftheecosystemsinthearea
whilestillallowingforsomedevelopment.ThelargenumberofhomestheVerdindevelopmentcompany
proposestosqueezeintothisareawilldetractfromthewildernessandbeautyofthePreserve.Yet,another
areaofconcernwouldbetheovercrowdingofschoolsintheDeerValleySchooldistrict.
Weneedtoprotectourbeautifuldesert.Therearemanyotherareastobuildonsowecanallappreciatethe
scenery.Afterallthisiswhywelivehere.
Keepingsomesemblanceofthedesertlifestyleiswhywemovedhere.Donotignorethesafeguards.Reducethe
numberofhousingunits.Whydoyouwanttodobusinesswithacompanywhichclearlydoesnotrespect
nature,butonlytheeconomicbottomlineͲ$
Enjoybicyclingthroughthepreserve.Theroadistoonarrowforthetrafficalreadyusingtheparkway.
ThiszoningwouldbeuncharacteristicoftheSonoranpreserveandcityparksurroundingthesite.
ItravelSonoranDesertDriveeverydaybecauseIliverightoffofit.Itisabeautifuldrive,butalsoonethatis
verysereneandpeaceful.IamconcernedthatallowingtheVerdincommunitytobebuiltattherequested
densityitwillcauseagreatimpactandstresstothedrivethroughthePreserve.Eveniftheroadisexpandedto
morelanes,thisroadwillbecomeadangerousrouteforthebikersandhikersinthearea,nottomentionthe
drivers.Pleasedonotallowthedensityforthisnewcommunityasrequested!
Weneedmoreopenspaceandalreadyhaveenoughhomes!
Weselectedthisareatolive,inpart,basedonthefeelingofbeingclosertonature.TheSonoranPreserveplayed
abigpartinthatfeeling.ThelossofanyPreserveopenspaceortheincreaseintrafficthruthePreservewill
diminishthatfeeling.Pleaserequirealldeveloperstocomplywithexistingdeveloprestrictionsanddonot
"lessen"thoserestrictions.ͲThankyou...
Ihavelivedinthisareafortwentyyearsanditisgettingsocrowdedandoverbuilt.Wemustpreserveopen
outdoorspaceforpeopletoenjoythepeaceofthedesertandrecreationareasthatareourArizonatreasures
ThebeautyofthisPreserveareashouldbePRESERVED.ThereisareasonwhytheDCODexists.
Trafficcongestion,pedestrianandbicyclesafety.Preservingthisareafromdevelopment,asenvisionedbythe
DesertCharacterOverlayDistrict.
Toomuchhousingbuildout,let'sslowitdown
Toomuchhousingbuildout,needtoslowdownalittle
Iwanttoprotectthewildernessandessenceofthepreserve.Ithoughtthislandwasprotectedfromfuture
housingdevelopment
Page 1131
Thisareaisimportanttousaswehikeandbike.Knowingthatpreservewillalwaysbeheremadebuyingour
homeeasy.Wewouldlikeforalldevelopmenttomindandtakecareofourdesertspaces.Thereisareasonthe
DesertCharacterOverlayDistrictwascreated.Toignorethiswouldbeatragedy.
ItisveryimportanttoretainournaturaldesertandtheSonoranPreserve.
Wespecificallymovedtothisareab/cofthepreserveandthepeacefulnessthatitbringstoourlivesand
neighborhood.Districtguidelinesareinplaceforareasonandshouldnotbeadjustedforagreedydeveloper.
Thisismyneighborhood..Ilivehere.Ihikethesebeautifultrailsfivetimesaweek.Thereareplentyofacresof
desertinotherareas.Peoplecomefromalloverthevalleytohikeandbikehere.Thislandhasbeensetasidefor
thisandshouldnotbetakenaway.
Thegrowthinthisareaisalreadyatanalltimehigh.ThissmallareaofdesertPRESERVEiswhymanyofus
movedtothearea.ThePRESERVEisusedbyhikersandbikersasabeautifulgetawaythatisinourbackyard.
Everyotherinchhasalreadybeendevelopedbyapartmentcomplexes.Enough!!LeaveourPRESERVEalone!!
IlivearoundthecornerinSonoranFoothillscommunityandoneofthereasonswemovedherewastobeable
tobikeonDoveValleyandSonoranDesert,aswetrainforTriathlonsyearround.Everycaryouaddtothese
roadsmakesthismoredangerousforus.IhavealmostbeenhittwicebycarscomingoutofSonoranGate
community.Theproposeddevelopmentofover1400homeswilldestroythisveryspecialarea.
Trafficismymainissue.AsaSonoranbikerouteitisbecomingmoreandmoredangerousforbikers.School
trafficonmainroadsandthroughneighborhoodsalsohasbecomemoredangerous.Wildernesscanneverbe
recapturedoncehomesarebuiltsowehaveaonceinalifetimedutytosavelandforconservationandwildlife.
asathirdgenerationnativezoney,Ihaveseentoomuchofourbeautifuldesertturnedovertodevelopers.We
mustpreservetheveryassetthatdrawssomanytomovetoourwonderfulstateͲfindabetterbalancebetween
growthandpreservation.IrecentlymovedtoahomeinSonoranFoothillstoenjoythisbeautifularea.Please
donotallowthegreedofdevelopersoverbuildourdesert.
Iabsolutelylovethebeautyofthedesertandtheopportunitywehavetogetoutinthepreservetohike,run
andbike.Iamanavidtrailrunnerandhikerandwouldbedevastatedifwelosethatabilityjusttomakewayfor
morehouses.
IliveinSonoranGate.IhikeApacheTrail.
Ilovehikinginthepreserve.Anyonewhointendsonbuildinganywhereclosetoitneedstofollowtherules.
Ourdesertisatrisk.Weneedyoutoprotectitbyrequiringthebuildertodotherightthing.
Imovedherein2007tobenearthisgreatpreserveandtoliveI.Aquietcommunity.Addingthismuchhousing
developmentswillforeverimpactthisnaturalenvironment
It’simperativetopreserveandprotectthewildlifeandtheirnaturalhabitat.Thisareaisalreadyexplodingwith
growth&traffic.
Thereasonwemovedherewasthebeautyandtranquilityofthedesert.Wewerenotawareoftheproposed
‘citylike’communityVerdinwishestobuild.
TheSonoranDesertDriveisabeautifulnaturalareathatneedstobepreservedforfuturegenerations.Thereare
plentyofotherplacestodevelopclosertotheIͲ17
TheSonoranPreservealongSonoranDesertDriveallowsuscloseappreciationofthescenicdesertandits
thrivingecosystem.Otherpartsofthevalleyarebetterequippedforgrowthandinfill.Weneedtoembrace
densitywherethecityismorepreparedtosupportit.Thispatchworksprawlintotheouterreachesofthedesert
chopsuptheexpanseofhabitatunnecessarily.Ifitcontinues,wecanonlylookforwardtosmallpatchesof
desertbrushbetweenhomesasopposedtomilesofouruniquedesertthatwecanallenjoy.
Therehasbeenenoughdevelopmentinthisarea.Stopcrowdingoutthewildlife.
Thisareaneedstobepreservedasoriginallydesignedinorderforthemembersofthiscommunitytoenjoya
placetogetawayfromalltheoverdevelopment.
Page 1132
Wemoveduptothisareatoenjoythebeautyandtranquilityofthearea.Nowitisbeingthreatened.Wemoved
uptothisareatoseeourbeautifuldessertinitsnaturalhabit,andnowit'sbeingthreatened.Wemoveduphere
becauseitwasagreatdreamcometrue,andnowthatdreamisagainbeingthreatenedbythosewishingto
makemanydollarsoffthelandandenvironmentthatbelongstousall.Please,pleaselet'sstopthistravesty.
Thanksforreadingmyinput.Wejustsoloveituphereandhopefornomoregrowthanddevelopment.
WithalltheapartmentsbeingbuiltonthewestendbetweenDoveValley&SonoranDesertDrive,thetrafficwill
becomejustlikethecitystreets—noisyandcongested.Verdinproposingadditionalhomeswillmakeitthat
muchworse.Inaddition,wemovedtothisareabecauseoftheSonoronDesertPreservewhichisbecomingnon
Conservationwillprotectthewildlife.Drivingthemoutoftheirnaturalhabitatcouldputsomeanimalsatriskof
extinction.Thereareotherdesertareas/landthatcouldbebuilton.Preservingwillhelpreduceourfootprintand
helpreducetrafficandpollution.
EverywherenearSonoranpreserveanddesertdriveconstructionsarehappening,it’saverybeautifulhikeplace
toenjoyqualitytimewithfamilyandfriends,asaneighborhoodresidentIwouldliketokeepitbeautifulandnot
havehomesafterhomesgettingbuiltthere…therearehardlyanycommunityparkgettingbuiltinthearea..
Iamanavidhiker.Ienjoybeingabletoseenature,plantsandanimals.Wearealreadytakingsomuchnatural
habitatfromdesertlife.Overcrowdingthepreserveareaincreasespollutionbyhumansandtheirmachines.
Furthermore,lightandnoisepollutioncreateadditionalissues.Pleaseconserveourpreserve.
Iamanavidhiker.Ienjoybeingabletoseenature,plantsandanimals.Wearealreadytakingsomuchnatural
habitatfromdesertlife.Overcrowdingthepreserveareaincreasespollutionbyhumansandtheirmachines.
Furthermore,lightandnoisepollutioncreateadditionalissues.Pleaseconserveourpreserve.
IfrequentlyrecreateintheareaͲitisfrequentedbyalotofpeople.Bothontheroadwithlimitedtrafficandon
thetrails.ItwouldbedetrimentaltothefoundationofthePhoenixPreservestotakeawaylanddedicatedto
openspaceandlettingdeveloperstearitapart.Developerscangetlandfurtheroutontheoutskirtsoftownto
developͲnotareasalreadydedicatedasopenspaceforalltorecreatenowandfuturegenerations.
Ihikethruthepreservealmosteveryday.Itisabeautifulandpeacefulareaamidthecity.Losingthisareato
Koreahousingwouldbeawful.Thereissomuchdevelopmenteverywheresothesespecialareasarebecoming
allthemoreimportanttospareornotoverdevelop.Onceitisgoneitcannotbereplaced.Pleasedon'tletthis
wonderfulareaberuinedbymoreoverdevelopment!
Itisaverypeacefulplacetohike.Myfamilygoestherefrequently.ThebeautyofSonoranDesertDrisso
beautifulitshouldnotbedisturbed.
It’svitaltokeepthepreservenaturalanduntouchedfortheuseofhikingandsupportingoutdooractivities.
Withouttheregulationsinplacetherewouldbenopreservetouseandadmire.Theanimalsinthepreserve
wouldbegreatlyaffectedbyalargerpopulationcrowdingthem.
it'sanaturaltreasurethatisspecialandneedstobeprotected.
LivingbythebeautifulSonoranMountainPreserveareaandSonoranDesertDrive,allowspeopletointeract
positivelywithnatureandtheenvironment.Thisisnecessaryforpeople’sphysicalandmentalwellbeing,which
weallrediscoveredduringthepandemicwhenitwasoneofthefewthingspeoplewereallowedtodo.The
MountainPreserveallowspeopletoconnectwithnatureandenjoythepeacefuloutdoorenvironment.The
peopleinthearealovetheopenspacesandserenitythattheSonoranDesertMountanPreserveprovides.They
walk,bikeorhikeintheneighborhoodeveryday.Ifthesedevelopersareallowedtooverdevelopthisbeautiful
areaitwillbeadetrimenttothealreadyestablishedneighborhoodsbyincreasedpopulationthroughclustered
housing,traffic,safety,noiselevels,overcrowdedschools,andahostofotherissues.Thismountainpreserveis
vitaltothewellbeingandsafetyofpeoplewhochosetoliveforhereforabetterqualityoflife.Pleasedon’t
allowthesedeveloperstodestroytheMountainPreserve.Thankyou
Maintaindesertpreserve,congestion,qualityoflife,saferplacetoenjoydesertwithexercise.
MyfamilyandIlovehikingintheSonoranPreserve.It’showwespendourweekends.Wewouldhatetolose
anymoreoftheland,theatmosphere,theanimals.Pleasesavetheland.Thankyou
Page 1133
MyhusbandandImovedintotheareaspecificallyforthetrailsandwildernessoftheSonoranPreserve.Wehike
thetrailsatleasttwiceaweekwithourdogs.Pleasedonotallowmoreencroachmentjustforthesakeof
makingmoremoney!Iamaretiredregisterednurseandservedtheindigentpopulationsandcan'taffordto
moveagain.Pleasestopthis!
Myselfandsomanyofmyneighborsandfriendshikethisareaonaregularbasis!Thereisanestthatanowl
comesbacktoeveryyear!Therearebeautifulfeesoftheamazingareainwhichsomanyofuscallhome!Please
don’tdestroyanareaweloveandcherish
Needtopreserveasmuchofourbeautifulmountainsaspossible
OurfamilyenjoysthescenicdrivedownSonoranDesertDrive.I’msaddenedtoheartheyalreadyhaveplansto
developsomeofthatland.ThedessertlandscapeandeasyaccesstotrailsfromFiresideareuniquetolivingin
NorterraandIwouldhatetoseethatchange.It’salreadybecomingovercrowdeduphereandtrafficiseffected.
Pleaseconsiderpreservingourbeautifuldesertlandscape.
Ourwildlifeisbeingdisplacedandsoonwillnothaveaplacetolive.Peoplewantthemkilledastheyareafraidof
them!WewillliveinadenserareaanditwillsoonfeellikeNYCity!Wemustfindabalanceforall.
QualityofLifewillbedestroyed!Letusstartwithhabitatdestruction.Thenlet'sdiscussthewatershortage.
September2021,itwasreportedthattheBureauofReclamationhasdeclaredawatershortageontheColorado
River,whichmeansthatArizona,alongwithNevadaandMexico,willgetlesswaterthannormalby2022.Ifwe
continuetodestroyourdesertwithunnecessarydevelopmentforthesakeofthealmightydollarthenwemight
aswellliftallrestrictions.Whenwillitend?Whenisenoughgrowthenough?MaricopaCountywasthenumber
onecountyinthenationforgrowthinthepastyear.Thisneedstostop!Wearedestroyingourhumanhabitat
byallowingthesedeveloperstobullytheirwayintotheseareas.Nowlet'sdiscusssafety?LookatourPolice
Deptorlackthereof.Wecan'tsustainthisridiculousgrowth.Pleasedowhatyoucantohelppreserveour
beautifulSonoranPreserve!
QualityofLifewillbedestroyed!Letusstartwithhabitatdestruction.Thenlet'sdiscussthewatershortage.
September2021,itwasreportedthattheBureauofReclamationhasdeclaredawatershortageontheColorado
River,whichmeansthatArizona,alongwithNevadaandMexico,willgetlesswaterthannormalby2022.Ifwe
continuetodestroyourdesertwithunnecessarydevelopmentforthesakeofthealmightydollarthenwemight
aswellliftallrestrictions.Whenwillitend?Whenisenoughgrowthenough?MaricopaCountywasthenumber
onecountyinthenationforgrowthinthepastyear.Thisneedstostop!Wearedestroyingourhumanhabitat
byallowingthesedeveloperstobullytheirwayintotheseareas.Nowlet'sdiscusssafety?LookatourPolice
Deptorlackthereof.Wecan'tsustainthisridiculousgrowth.Pleasedowhatyoucantohelppreserveour
beautifulSonoranPreserve!
Somanyanimalswillgetdisplacedfromtherenaturalhabitats.
TheDonoranapreserveisapeacefulareausedbymanypeopleforhiking,mountainbikingandhorseback
riding.Addingmorehouseswillincreasethenumberofpeopleusingthetrailsaswellascreatemoretrafficin
ThepreservegivesushikingtrailsandallowseveryonetoenjoythebeautyoftheArizonadesertandwildlife.It
wouldalsodramaticallydecreasepropertyvaluesforthepeoplevotingforyoutoremaininoffice.
Thisareaisgreatlyusedforhiking,biking,trailrunning,andoutdoorrecreationalactivities.Wedonotwant
overdevelopmenttoruinthenaturalaesthetics,significantlyincreasenoise,orpollutionthatwoulddegradethe
valueofthetrueremainingwildernessintheSonoranDesertPreserve.Pleaseseektoenforceandupholdthe
DesertCharacterOverlayDistricttowardtheVerdinprojectandothersubsequentproposals.
Thisisabeautifulandvibrantpartofourcommunity.Don’tdestroyitbyaddingadditionalresidential
development.Oncethosehousesgetinthere,theyaregoingtobecomplainingandadvocatingforcommercial
developmentbecausetheydon’twanttodrive20minutestoshopsandrestaurants.Beforeweknowit,allof
thepreservewillbegone.Thehikingtrails,thenature,andtheareaispristine.
Page 1134
ThisisadesignatedDesertSonoranPreserve.Theestablishedtrailsareusedbythousandsandthepreserve
hostshabitatforArizonawildlifeincludingjavelina,bobcat,coyote,raccoon,groundsquirrelandmanymore.
ThereareavarietyofbirdandreptilespeciesGilaMonster,greathornedowl,roadrunner,gamblesquail,Inca
dove,Cardinals,spottedwhiptailandchuckwallalizardstomentionafew.ThisareaofPhoenixcannotbe
expandedintoalegislatedpreserve.Toomanyapartmentsintheareahasalreadyincreasedcrime,drugsand
trafficcongestion.AnyadditionalhousingandapartmentdevelopmentrequestsinthenorthPhoenixareamust
bedenied.Respectfully,BillShackelford.VotingResident
Usethatareatobikethetrails.Wanttokeepthespacenaturalbeautynotfilledwithhomes.
Wanttokeeparealowertraffic
Welovethebeautyandtranquilityofthedesert.
WelovethebeautyoftheSonoranPreserve.Pleaseprotectwhatisleftandsavethebeautyofthedessert.
Welovetohikethisbeautifularea.AlsothedrivedownSonoranparkwayisincredible.Wemustpreservethis
desertnotonlyforhumanenjoymentbutalsothewildlifethatcallithome
Weneedtokeepasmuchnatureuntouchedandbeautiful.
Weneedtopreservethebeautyofournaturalhabitats.Therearealreadyplentyofplacesthatarezonedfor
building.Pleasedonotletgreedruinourneighborhood.
WeneedtopreservethebeautyoftheSonoranPreserve.
Weneedtopreservetheopenspacesthatattractsomanytotheareaforrecreation.Thereisalotofbuildingof
highoccupancyunitsandhousingunderway.Schoolsarealreadyatcapacity,newservicesarebeingbuilton
Jomaxtoeasetheinflux,roadinfrastructureneedstobeinconsiderationto.
Whilethecontinuedexpansionofhomesandbuildingintothisareaisinevitableandneeded,themaintenance
oftheDesertCharacterOverlayisimportanttokeepthebeautyandfeelofthisarea.Theresidentswholive
heremovedhereforareason,andweappreciatetheforethoughtthatwentintotheDesertCharacterOverlay
originally.Pleasedonotabandonthis.Itwouldbeonethingifthebuilderwerebuildingreasonablypriced
homestoassistwiththeaffordablehousingshortage,buttheyarenot.Thisrequestispurelyforthefinancial
advantageofthebuilderandthedetrimentofourcommunity.
Becasuewehikethetrailsregularlyandthefeelingofbeinglostinnaturesoclosetohomeisspecial.Itshould
beprotectedandIhopemydaughtercanenjoyitthesamewayoneday.
IliveintheSonorandesertnorthofPhoenix,Don’twantitdestroyedbycontinuingbuilding.Leaveitinit’s
naturalstate,sowecanenjoythedesertforgenerationsplease.
Pleasepreservethebeautifuldesert.
Withalltheplanneddevelopmentinthearea,Ihaveamajorconcernabouttheinfrastructure,andeven
plannedexpansion,beingabletosupporttheadditionalhousinginthepreserve.Partoftheappealofourareais
thedesertbeauty,soadditionally,overturningdistrictsafeguardsnotonlydamagesthenaturalenvironment,
butrisksallthosethatalreadylive/workinthiscommunity.
IbelievetherearemultiplereasonsforkeepingourviewsforalltoenjoyͲtopreservethedesertandthe
animalsͲsowecanenjoythesolaceinthiswonderfulareabywalking,biking,drivingorjustplainrelaxinginthe
outdoors.AlsodrivingonthisSonoranstretchofroadcurrentlyneedsmorerestrictionsͲsuchastrafficlightsat
allintersectionsforturning.MuchspeedingͲneedtohavemoremonitoringofspeedrequirements.Adding
morehousingisjustgoingtoaddtoaloseofthedesertpreserveandimpossiblestreet/roadconditions.When
webuiltourhomehere,weweretoldthattherewererestrictionstokeepourdesertpreserved.
WiththeamountoftrafficonSonoran/DoveValleytoday,whenwepulloutofSonoranGateCommunity,itis
takingachanceonyourlifewhenneedingtoturnleft.Whywouldanyoneapprovemorehomebuildingtoget
moretraffic?AlsocarsͲandtrucksͲarespeedingbetween55Ͳ70milesanhouronthisstretch.Youshouldhave
trafficlightsatallintersectionsforturningtraffic.Also,Let'sSaveOurDesertViewsͲthat'swhywebuiltahome
Ibelievehonoringthemeaningofthepreserveisofutmostimportance.
Page 1135
Myfamilyhikesandmountainbikesseveraltimesperweekonthesetrails.Wetrulyappreciatethislandand
wouldnotwantitsinhabitantstobedisruptedanyfurtherthantheyalreadyare.
ThesceneryisbeautifulalongSonoranDesertDriveandtoseesectionsofitbeingdevelopedforhousing
projectswilltakeawayfromthebeautythatwehaveallcometoloveaboutthisarea.
AsaresidentlivingatFireside,Ihaveseenjavelinas(uptoadozenatatime)andotherwildanimalscomeupto
ourhomelookingforfoodandemptyinggarbageatnight.Bytearingdownmorenaturalandwildhabitatfor
additionalhomeswillonlyincreasetheexistingproblemsfortheanimalsinthedessertwhenmoreoftheir
naturalhabitatistorndown.Stoptearingintothenaturalsurroundingpreserve.
WemovedtoourcurrenthometoenjoythebenefitsofhavingaccesstotheSonoranPreserve.TheDesert
CharacterOverlayDistrictwascreatedtopreservetheintegrityofthispreciouscommodity,ifitisignored,the
beautyandrecreationalbenefitsofthepreservewillbesignificantlyreduced.
Iparticipateinrunningandhikingintheareaandtreasurethenaturalbeautyofthedesertlandscape.
WehaveoverpopulatedtheNorthPhoenixareaalreadywithmanydenseresidencies,namelyapartment
complexesandtownhomes.Ibelieveweneedtoslowdownandconsiderexpansioninadifferentdirectionso
thatwedon'tlosemanyofourbeautifulmountainandnatureparcelsthatweneedtosave.Ifeelthisisbeing
rushedandhasnotbeenthoroughlyreviewedandvetted.
I’velivedinthepreserveareasinceIwasverylittle.Weneedtokeepthedesertadesert,ournativeanimalsare
continuallybeingforcedtocohabitatewithhumansandit’snotgoingwelk.Continuetogivethemtheirspace
sothatwecanalllivetogetherwithouthostileinteraction
Hikingandtheoverallaccesstotheoutdoors
Myconcernisforpublicsafetyfirstandforemost.InadditiontothewideningoftheSonoranroadwayandthe
disregardfortheserenityofthedesert.FinallyIfeeltheCityisgrowingtoofastwithlittleregardforPublic
Safetyandinfrastructuregrowth.
Thisissoimportanttoprotectthenaturalbeauty,wildlife,ecosystems,andquietqualityoflifethatdraws
peopletotheareaandthestateingeneral.Pleaseacttopreventthepotentiallyirreparabledamagediscarding
thesesafeguardscouldcause!
Weneedtomaintainthebeautyofthevalley.Areasneedtobeprotectedandrespectedsoallcanenjoy.
IusetheSonoranpreservealmostdailytogetabriefreprievefromtheovercrowdingofPhoenix.Theabilityto
brieflyenjoythedesertviewswithoutseeingendlessdevelopmentsandchokingsmogofcarsiswhywedecided
toliveinthisarea.
PleasefollowtheDesertCharacterOverlayDistrictplan.Keeptrafficlowandundevelopedlandsowecanenjoy
thepreserve.
TheSonoranpreserveisaspotwhereIhike,bikeandrun5Ͳ6timesperweek.Itrulyenjoythebeautifulnatural
preservethisareahas.TheanimalsIseeduringmyadventuresisalsopriceless.Itrulyhopethispetitionmakes
achange!
Page 1136
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-62-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and GPA-DSTV-1-18- 2)
Date: Monday, April 4, 2022 9:54:09 AM
Attachments: CB_ltr_2019_cmt.docx
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Mandy Fellows
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 7:17 AM
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: Z-TA-5-18-2 (Companion Cases Z-62-18-2, Z-75-18-2, and GPA-DSTV-1-18- 2)
Dear Mr. Grande,
In regards to the above subject items scheduled at Desert View Village Meeting on 4/5/22.
First, I have attached a letter written by Dr. Sullivan in 2019 regarding this immediate area. He and a
team from ASU have spent the past 32 years study the elite wildlife and fauna. I would like his letter
distributed, again, to the Village committee. It was given to participants in 2019 when this same
Development was presenting at that time. The letter speaks for itself
Second, I would like to formally request a FEMA study of this Floodplain Designated area prior to the
topsoil being disturbed. Any movement of this Floodplain will create significant increases into
Apache and Cave Creek washes that surround this proposed development. In addition, the bridges
on Sonoran Parkway for these two washes need to be re-evaluated for increased flow! Their bottom
of girder elevation is just at the FEMA 100 year flood flow and they could potentially be wiped out
with increased water activity. These two bridges, if wiped out during a massive monsoon rain, would
strand any homeowners as the access roads out of the development are only between these two
bridges.
Page 1137
Lastly, I would like the committee to understand that the Desert Character Overlay has been in place
since the Sonoran Parkway was put in and needs to be adhered to, as does the current and long
standing Zoning. Just because Taylor Morrison doesn't like it does not make it appropriate to
rezone!! They should be required to alter the development to fit within all those ordinances!! Why
should it be the other way around?? Thousands of Sonoran Preserve wildlife and fauna will be
ruined to put in massive utilities and that is unacceptable as well! A smaller, more elite developer
could build homes on 1 acre sites, less traffic and less utilities! They could sell for 1M+ and no
ordinance changes would be needed. Taylor Morrison is only out for greed and if these ordinances
are changed for them they will surely only want more and more.
The Village and City Planning MUST enforce the DCO and Zoning requirements put in place after
millions of dollars of studies!!
Thank you for your attention and distribution of this letter to the Village for tomorrow's meeting.
Sincerely,
Mandy Fellows
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android [go.onelink.me]
Page 1138
15 March 2019
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Dear Committee Members:
I understand that as a committee, you will consider a proposed rezoning (“Z-62-18-2”)
of a parcel of land immediately north of Cave Buttes in northern Maricopa County. I
contact you to respectfully request that you oppose this rezoning. By so doing you will
act both to protect the natural resource value of the entire Cave Creek watershed and
to subsequently promote additional acquisitions rather than additional development.
I hope to draw your attention to the biological resources available in Cave Buttes,
Maricopa County, resources used by scientists and students, bikers and hikers, bird
watchers and nature enthusiasts, as well as simple residents in their everyday lives. By
placing a high value on the natural diversity of the Cave Buttes area, by insuring that
your actions contribute to the preservation of that area to the fullest extent possible, I
think that you will maximize the use and enjoyment of those areas by all Phoenix area
residents over the coming years of continued growth and coincident incursions into the
surrounding landscapes. I provide my comments as a scientist, resident of the area,
and concerned citizen. More specifically, as a professor of ecology and evolutionary
biology, I have been working in Cave Buttes over 40 years, and in the past ten years
have been conducting continuous long-term studies of a number of wildlife species in
the area (e.g., desert tortoises, horned lizards, spadefoot toads, and others). I know it
well.
Rezoning of the parcel in question will have two major and immediate impacts: 1) loss
of unique valley floor and small wash habitats due to development; and 2) loss of a
critical wildlife corridor connecting the current mountain preserves through the central
valley floor (north and south), and some degree of impact on adjacent corridors in
nearby washes (Apache and Cave creeks). These losses are outlined in greater detail
below.
Habitat loss: flats or valley floors and small washes are unique additions to biotic
diversity of mountain (i.e., upland only) preserves. The specific area in question
represents prime habitat between the southern and northern Union Hills, as it contains
numerous small “feeder” washes between the major drainages of Cave Creek (to the
east) and Apache Wash (to the west). The adjacent floodplains (“flats) and these
washes contain unique habitats not contained within the current mountain preserves
(Sonoran Preserve, north and south). As documented in the Sonoran Preserve Master
Plan (Anonymous, 1998) and the original vegetation surveys (1996, 1998), these wash
habitats are botanically rich, and used by a variety of wildlife species. The valley floor in
this area also contains remnant grassland species (eg, Tobosa, Pencil Cholla and Cane
Page 1139
Cholla) rarely encountered in the Phoenix metro area (more commonly associated with
the Agua Fria Grasslands to the immediate north).
Corridor impacts: The loss of this much habitat adjacent to the Parkway further
degrades the corridor potential over and above that resulting from the Parkway alone.
These connections or corridors allow for critical population exchange. A number of
species, including Sonoran Desert tortoises, javelina, mountain lion and many others,
use the valley floors as corridors. For example, desert tortoises only rarely leave the
uplands, but they must be able to traverse valley floors to maintain a series of
connected populations, genetically speaking. Faced with the prospect of even larger
numbers of local residents, the current connectivity between north and south preserves
would be further compromised.
The most immediate need is for larger areas of valley floors and washes to be
preserved adjacent to the existing mountain preserves, providing both additional habitat
absent from the upland slope areas already protected, AND providing important
linkages for wildlife traveling between these preserves. The broad, historic floodplain
between Apache Wash and Cave Creek, precisely the area to be developed, is the most
desirable acreage to serve the purposes described above (maintain diversity, promote
gene exchange and population connectivity). Ideally, if additional development MUST
occur, it should be moved to the east or the west along the parkway, leaving this high
quality habitat intact.
I can safely state that I have spent more time in Cave Buttes that anyone over the past
ten years. I urge you to use your advisory power to promote protection of this land
and to aid the city of Phoenix in upholding its duty under the public trust to preserve
the value of the land for future generations.
Sincerely,
Brian K. Sullivan, PhD
Professor of Herpetology and Evolutionary Biology
Arizona State University
Page 1140
References:
Anonymous, 1998. Sonoran Preserve Master Plan. City of Phoenix., Burke, J. and J. Ewan, primary
authors. 57 pp.
Ewan, J. M., R. Fish Ewan, T. Craig, and S. Scheiner. 1996. Cave Creek Wash preservation boundary
study. Herberger Center for Design Excellence, ASU, Tempe.
Ewan, J. M., and R. Fish Ewan. 1998. North Phoenix Wash vegetation study. Herberger Center for Design
Excellence, ASU, Tempe. 43 pp.
Page 1141
From: Ann Wilde
To: Julianna Pierre; Anthony M Grande
Subject: Z-TA-5-18-2
Date: Monday, April 4, 2022 10:09:23 PM
Please distribute the comments below to members of the Desert View Planning
Committee.
Not long ago I was at the Whitewater Draw and saw a Nature Note posited by Arizona
Game and Fish Department:
In part the Note read, "The primary threat to the existence of any wildlife population is
the loss or degradation of its habitat. . . .Take away the lifeblood of an ecosystem,
and in time, the ecosystem also dies."
On the VerdinPhoenix.com website one reads:
"As State Trust land surrounding Sonoran Desert Drive is auctioned off in the future
for employment, commercial, and residential uses to support . . . this growth, our goal
is that Verdin will set a stunning precedent for desert-sensitive development adjacent
to the Sonoran Preserve."
Also stated:
"Our vision for Verdin is to create an authentic desert community that brings the
wonder and peace of nature into daily life."
The two statements conflict with the request to amend (or move away from the
proposed project) the provisions that protect the desert ecosystem. Once the
ecosystem is altered in a major way, it won't recover. Unintended repercussions may
develop in coming years. For many years the area currently proposed for
development has been zoned for a housing density that was determined suitable for
the area.
Please hold firm to the vision in place when it was written that "the Desert View
Village has "land uses [that] compliment the equestrian ranch properties, with vast
amounts of open space and large lot single-family residences."
The desert maintenance overlay Sub-District A does not have to be amended or
removed for development to occur--only for development to occur as currently
proposed for the Verdin project.
The existing and current zoning requiring lower density housing supports
better preservation of habitat and movement of wildlife.
The City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance Section 653A states that "[the] Desert
Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with regards to density
allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and
the wildlife corridor along Cave Creek Wash."
The ordinance continues in 653B to state "[It's] purpose . . . is to guide development
that will blend with the undisturbed desert environment rather than dominate it."
The advantages of maintaining the desert maintenance character overlay:
Page 1142
-provides guidance for new development to occur within the context of the fragile
undisturbed desert;
-encourages development that will blend with the undisturbed desert rather than
dominate it;
-natural washes and the surrounding area are protected.
As an ordinary person who lives in the general area and values nature and the desert,
I support keeping the desert maintenance character overlay as it currently exists
along Sonoran Desert Drive.
I respectfully request that you give serious consideration to supporting development
at the lower housing density supported by the Desert Maintenance Character
Overlay. I realize that housing is needed; more housing requires more water and
infrastructure; and growth will not be stopped. Hopefully, with your recommendation,
growth will occur in a measured manner that supports maintaining a desert character,
rather than a large master planned community with triple the number of homes
imposed on a fragile ecosystem.
Thank you for taking the time to consider these thoughts.
Ann Wilde
Page 1143
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Letter to the Desert View VPC for the Verdin Project (Formerly MacEwen 480)
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 12:55:25 PM
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Keeli Keeler
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 12:52 PM
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: Letter to the Desert View VPC for the Verdin Project (Formerly MacEwen 480)
As a local resident in the area and concerned citizen I would like to reach out to you, the Desert View
Village Planning Committee, as you prepare to meet this evening to discuss and vote on the Verdin
Project. I am not opposed to development of the property off of Sonoran Desert Drive across
from the Preserve, however, I am opposed to the realignment and zoning amendments that
Taylor Morrison is seeking approval for in relation to the Verdin/MacEwen 480 Project, Z-62-18-
2.
Development is bound to occur as people continue to move to the Phoenix area and more housing is
needed. However, I ask for you to consider the overwhelming presence of residents living in the
area, outdoor enthusiasts who frequently bike and hike in the area, and people invested in the
preservation of this land from all across Phoenix that were in such strong opposition to these same
proposed changes back in 2019. I appreciate that after such a strong opposition that Taylor Morrison
went back to the drawing board to address some of the concerns of traffic and partnered with the
National Wildlife Foundation to address some of the preservation concerns. However, they are still
requesting to remove other protective measures that were put in place to help preserve the
beauty of this land and surrounding preserve. It is a unique piece of land that is directly across
from the Preserve, and should be treated as such. Decisions made for development today will
impact future development along this corridor when state trust land is sold off to developers. The
community and the VPC are in a unique position to keep developers accountable for responsible
Page 1144
development in such a unique and beautiful part of the valley.
This property in consideration was a privately owned parcel that was sold to Taylor Morrison and
does in fact currently allow for development of homes. However, the current zoning would restrict
Taylor Morrison to 1 home per acre. Under current zoning, these would be estate properties
similar to some of the other unique and protected areas around Northern Phoenix like the Boulders,
Spur Cross Ranch, etc., and would support the initial intent of zoning in this area to minimize impact
to the surrounding desert. However, Taylot Morrison is not in the business of estate-type properties,
but instead the business master planned communities with as many homes as possible. Taylor
Morrison's attorney has gone so far as trying to convince everyone that by adding in some open
edges, homeowner classes, and by creating trails to join to the preserve that it will not change how
the desert looks or impact any of the surrounding wildlife, plants, and preserve by increasing the
zoning to allow 3-5 homes per acre. While these are all nice things to add to the community that
came from suggestions by the NWF, it is absolutely false as rezoning to allow that many homes
will in fact impact the surrounding desert, wildlife and strain resources. Rezoning the parcel in
question will have some major and immediate impacts: 1) negative impact to the habitat
from development and destruction of the unique valley floor 2) negative impact to the wildlife
corridor, and 3) subsequent impact on adjacent land, flora, fauna and wildlife. Taylor Morrison is a
business - the business of building as many homes for as much profit as they possibly can - these
requests for rezoning are nothing more than that. For them it isn't about the environment or the
community, but profits and opportunities to maximize growth. I strongly request the VPC to
consider the impact that the rezoning request would have and vote NO on the portion of the
request.
Taylor Morrison is also requesting to move and/or completely remove the desert character overlay
from the property in question. Their attorney and council has tried to create a story that the initial
plan for the desert character overlay was only the intent for that time period versus a well thought
out effort to help protect an important habitat from massive future development. Additionally,
Taylor Morrison's legal representative has also tried to state that it should be moved because of the
change in where the road was put through instead of the initial plan of where the road was
anticipated to go. Based on the research that I was able to do and comments from others who were
around when the group was formed to create the initial desert character overlay, the intent of the
desert character overlay took into account the future intent to develop in the area and was created
to in fact help protect vital areas of the desert to minimize impact to the Preserve. Taylor
Morrison's attorney has created a false narrative in order to benefit a developer who has
attempted to appear like they are invested in sustainable and thoughtful development, but by all
attempts of removing protections in place is the exact opposite. Attempts to move the desert
character overlay north of Sonoran Desert Drive actually removes the desert character overlay
completely from the Taylor Morrison property for the Verdin project, and is completely useless as
that area is preserve land and as such is protected. By allowing a change/removal of the desert
character overlay to happen, it would also have major impacts to the surrounding desert and
wildlife, and only benefits the developer to allow more homes in an area in which they were never
intended. I strongly request the VPC to consider the impact that the desert overlay request
would have and vote NO on the portion of the request.
Page 1145
At the North Gateway VPC meeting last month, Taylor Morrison had some of their homeowners who
live in the neighboring Sonoran Gate community speak up in support of this development. The sole
argument from the two homeowners in support was the need for affordable housing in Phoenix and
how great it would be to have affordable housing in such a unique location so that people can enjoy
it. While it is true that Phoenix can use some additional affordable housing and that this is indeed a
unique piece of land in a unique area next to the preserve, any efforts to create "affordable
housing" will not exist in this area despite the lot size or number of homes just based on
proximity to the preserve and surrounding views. Additionally, this argument in support fails to
consider the impact that allowing this development to markedly change zoning requirements to
add at least 3-4 times the amount of homes in the intended area will have on the surrounding
desert as well as the future development that will follow as the state trust land is sold off to other
developers, which will completely negate any argument of people being able to enjoy it. People can
currently enjoy it by visiting the Apache Wash Trailhead to bike, hike, horseback ride, enjoy the
scenery and the wildlife. Mass development will impact the environment, wildlife, views, and
therefore make the area less of a beauty to enjoy. The Verdin / MacEwen 480 project will set a
precedent for how future development will go. Please help us stand in opposition to a massive
development right next to the preserve and support the intent of the current desert character
overlay and zoning to uphold responsible and sustainable development along this corridor.
As I had mentioned prior, development is bound to occur based on sheer need, but the decisions
that are made now can either help support responsible development in such a unique location or
solely benefit this developer and the others to come without taking into account the community
and Preserve.
I would request that the Desert View VPC:
1) Maintain the Master Plan as originally proposed within the current zoning
2) Maintain the desert character overlay to effectively control development surrounding the entire
Preserve area
3) Recognize the impact that the desert, Preserve, wildlife, flora and fauna, strain on resources, and
stress on infrastructure that massive development would have within the corridor.
Sincerely,
Keeli Keeler
Homeowner in Sonoran Foothills (Phoenix 85085)
Page 1146
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Fwd: Sonoran preserve. Let"s actually preserve it!
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:35:58 PM
Please add to the public record
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Dawn M
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:10 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Sonoran preserve. Let's actually preserve it!
Jim,
As a local resident, I am against any realignment/zoning amendment of Phoenix’s Master
Plan for the Sonoran Preserve as it relates to Taylor Morrison’s request for the
Verdin/McEwan 480 Project, Z-62-18-2. Key objection elements of the amendment include:
1. Remove the Desert Character Overlay requirement
2. Build homes outside of existing infrastructure
3. Massive up zone, 3–5 houses per acre
The developer is seeking to transform the Desert Character Overlay around the Preserve.
Moving it north of Sonoran Desert Drive is actually removing it because north of Sonoran
Desert Drive is the Preserve itself.
Regardless of previous statements, if all Plan Amendments proposed are passed, the
development will not be “truly unique.” Nor will it be as the developer committed, “ . . . a
context-sensitive community that sets the bar high for any future development in the area.”
It seems all the developer sees is growth, not thoughtful development, or sustainability. This
Plan Amendment only benefits the developer and not the community or the Preserve.
I am not a “recreational activist,” as cited on a recent local newscast. My objections seek to:
a. Maintain the Master Plan as originally proposed
b. Recognize the dismal condition of the Valley’s current and future water supply
c. Maintain the overlay as the effective way to control development in the entire Preserve
area
Kindly,
Dawn Mannon
Phoenix, Az
*******
Page 1147
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: preserving the Sonoran preserve
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:16:24 PM
Anthony Grande
Planner II – Village Planner
Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-256-5648
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: Dawn M
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 1:13 PM
To: PDD Desert View VPC
Subject: preserving the Sonoran preserve
As a resident of Phoenix (for almot 50 years), I have seen mass destruction of our beautiful desert. I
employ you to keep the desert overlay at the Sonoran Preserve. Please do not build massive
amounts of homes in our desert.
thank you,
Dawn Mannon
Phoenix, AZ
Page 1148
From: Susanne Rothwell
To: Julianna Pierre
Cc: Patrick and Eileen McMullen
Subject: FW: Final PMPC Letter (and contact info if helpful!)
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 10:52:39 AM
Attachments: FINAL 2022_03_31 Letter to City of Phoenix re VERDIN Applications[1].docx
Importance: High
Hello Julianna and the Desert View Village Planning Committee,
Please read the attached letter from Phoenix Mountains Preservation Committee (PMPC) President
Patrick McMullen and the PMPC board.
It is in regards to the proposed Taylor Morrison ‘Verdin’ re-zoning case coming before the
Committee tomorrow.
It is late so hoping that you will have some time to read it, as it is a particularly important issue for
the PMPC.
Kindest regards,
Susanne Rothwell
PMPC
Page 1149
PMPC SUMMARY - APRIL 3, 2022
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization charged
with the protection of the Phoenix Mountains Preserves write to you with our strong
support and encouragement to engage and monitor the Verdin Development of the 480
acres situated to the west of Cave Creek Wash and to the south of the Sonoran Parkway.
The Verdin location abuts to Sonoran Preserve.
The attached legal research conducted by the PMPC Attorney, lists our concerns and we
hope that you and City departments will continue to take them seriously and will apply the
sections of the zoning Ordinance that were written and included into the Ordinance to
protect these Preserve adjacencies and to ensure that the Preserves will remain available
to the public and enjoyable as well.
PMPC understands that Phoenix is a rapidly growing city and that large numbers of the
new population must be accommodated. A great effort was undertaken in past decades
to have the Sonoran Preserve acquired by the City at tax payer expense, with a large
effort by PMPC to identify and help to support the City efforts. We therefore are very
dedicated to keeping the Preserves available to the local citizens, and the Desert
Character Overlay continued and appreciated.
The Verdin Development planning team has taken important steps in the linking up of the
Sonoran Preserves, emphasis on desert plant maintenance, protection of plants and
animals, and meaningful public access to the Desert Preserves surrounding the new
Verdin development. What is needed is a more formal arrangement between the City of
Phoenix, Phoenix Citizens and the Verdin 480 Acre Development project team.
As a remembrance; On February 17, 1998, the [City] Council also voted unanimously to
adopt the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan and to move forward in acquiring this open
space. In doing so, the Council continues a time-honored precedent for protecting and
preserving desert open space within the city and for ensuring recreational access for our
citizens.”
PMPC is intensely interested in the pending development of the Verdin 480 acre site, as
it is an early project in the development of this corridor, and especially important for the
continued Desert character Overlay District enforcement.
Sincerely,
Patrick McMullen, PhD
Patrick McMullen, PhD
PMPC President
Page 1150
March 3, 2022
Mayor Kate Gallego Phoenix City Councilmembers
Phoenix City Hall Phoenix City Hall
200 W. Washington St. 200 W. Washington St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003 Phoenix, AZ 85003
Re: Objections of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. (PMPC) to
the Four Applications Submitted for “Verdin” Development Proposal (GPA-
DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2 and Z-62-18-2)
Dear Mayor Gallego:
This letter is submitted by the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc.
(PMPC) in opposition to the proposed Taylor Morrison “Verdin” housing development
project south of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th Street and 32nd Street alignments,
just west of Cave Creek Road in northern Phoenix (formerly “MacEwen 480”). We
understand that developer Taylor Morrison has filed several applications in furtherance
of this development including two zoning amendments, a General Plan Amendment, and
a Planned Unit Development application (hereinafter the “four applications”). 1 We
understand that these four applications were simultaneously approved by the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee on March 10, 2022 2, and the Desert View Village
Planning Committee is scheduled to meet on these four applications on April 5, 2022. 3
PMPC strongly objects to any actions, at any level, that would advance the four
applications as written, for reasons stated herein. First – the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District should not be modified but must remain intact, ensuring that washes, sensitive
species and their habitats, and the delicate desert ecosystem remain protected. The
rezoning is not simply a “technical clean-up” as the developer casually asserts, 4 but
rather, this rezoning would be an unprecedented rollback of protections carefully
researched and thoughtfully added to the Phoenix Zoning Code for this specific area
decades ago – protections that were specifically adopted to protect this desert area from
the very type of development pressure that is presented here. Second – simultaneous
consideration and approval of these four applications is contrary to the law and City of
Phoenix policy. Furthermore, public notice has been deficient.
General Plan Amendment (GPA-DSTV-1-18-2); Zoning Amendments (Z-75-18-2 and Z-75-5-
18); and Planned Unit Development (Z-62-18-2).
See Notice of Results, North Gateway Village Planning Committee Meeting (March 10, 2022).
See Notice of Public Meeting, Desert View Village Planning Committee (April 5, 2022).
See Letter re Z-75-18-2 Zoning Map Amendment (December 17, 2021), p.2
Page 1151
On behalf of PMPC, I ask that these applications not be approved as written but
that the Desert Maintenance Overlay District remain wholly intact, ensuring that
protections to washes, sensitive species and their habitats, and the delicate desert
ecosystem remain as intended.
About PMPC
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. is an organization founded in
1970 by Arizona visionaries dedicated to the protection of Phoenix’s Mountain Preserve
system. For the last 50 years, PMPC and its members have worked tirelessly to preserve,
protect, and advocate for the precious Mountain Preserve system, and to monitor and
address the rapid growth and development surrounding these important public resources.
For much of Phoenix’s modern history, our PMPC membership has worked hard
alongside hundreds of concerned Phoenix citizens and City staff to ensure that the
Sonoran Desert Preserves are protected and maintained as a valuable resource for all
citizens of Phoenix.
I. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District Must Not Be Altered
For many decades, protecting and preserving the unique desert features of the
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and the surrounding area has been a priority for the City of
Phoenix. The PMPC and its members were involved in and supported the development
and adoption of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (“DMOD” or “DMOD Overlay”)
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance in 2001, and the related working groups and
charettes involved with that process, as well as the formation and expansion of the
Phoenix Mountain Preserves. We support the critical protections carefully enacted by the
outlined in the DMOD Overlay, which must remain intact.
The true history of how the DMOD Overlay was developed is compelling. It is a
landmark instance of how land planning and landscape ecological principles can be
integrated as part of policy drafting processes. It should be a point of pride for the City of
Phoenix, and an asset worth protecting. Furthermore, the history shows that the DMOD
Overlay area and its boundaries were not simply dictated by road alignments (as the
developer incorrectly claims), but instead were carefully studied and thoughtfully drafted
in a manner integrating ecological considerations with planning structure, as part of one
of the most robust and widely supported Phoenix endeavors, to date. Finally, the owner(s)
of the “Verdin” property have owned this land for at least the last half-century, and have
had ample time and opportunities to challenge its classification over the last several
decades. The DMOD Overlay must not be altered.
Page 1152
History of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (DMOD)
On July 5, 2001, the approximately 6,724-acre DMOD was added to the Phoenix City
Zoning Ordinance at Section 653 (Sub-Districts A & B), shown on the following page. 5
It was carefully constructed by a large, interdisciplinary collaborative effort over
several years to study and understand the unique and sensitive characteristics of this
area, and protect those characteristics from the pressures of development. Historical city
documents and studies, reports, articles, and other research materials describe this
history, as summarized below.
1980s
On January 19, 1985, a large portion of northern Phoenix (including the current
DMOD Overlay area) was annexed into the city. 6 Tensions between increasing
development and impacts on sensitive desert areas were rising during this time. Spurred
in part by these tensions and concerns over the proposed development at Tatum Ranch, 7
the City Council developed a plan for this larger area, then called the peripheral Areas C
and D Areas, with “extensive” community assistance from a Council-appointed Citizen’s
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts).
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 4; see also City of Phoenix Annexation Map.
See Quay, Ray. “Bridging the Gap Between Ecological Research and Land Use Policy: The
North Sonoran Collaborative” Urban Ecosystems, 7:283-294 (2004). Tatum Ranch was one of
the first developments to use groundwater and wastewater, opening the doors for more
development north of the CAP canal.
Page 1153
Advisory Committee, as well as support from the State. 8 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan
was adopted in 1987.
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was intended to direct the City of Phoenix on
future land use and development densities “to ensure that development in the area was
compatible with and complementary to the unique and environmentally sensitive
characteristics of the area.” 9 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan describes this new
proactive approach: “Normally, the City is placed in a reactive role with respect to guiding
growth of a developing area. These northern areas; however, are largely undeveloped
and provide the City with a unique opportunity to anticipate growth and to establish an
overall framework to guide physical development.”10 Even at the time, the City recognized
that more work would be needed towards developing future protections, such as an
ordinance. 11
1990s
Development continued to increase in northern Phoenix during the early 1990s.
Subsequently, concerns about density and form of development within the ecologically
sensitive desert areas came to a critical point. A diverse group of public and private
planners, designers, environmental scientists, landscape architects, university
departments, as well as representatives from state agencies, private consultants, the City
of Phoenix, and State of Arizona began collaborating on a variety of studies, plans, and
charrettes for this area during this time. 12 This group (called the North Sonoran
Collaborative), formed and met regularly to address the gap between managing growth
and the ecological data needed to accomplish these goals. Their research was organized
into a multi-disciplinary GIS database, 13 one of the early instances of GIS usage by the
city and significant part of the group’s success.
The City of Phoenix began the process of revising the General Plan with detailed
objectives and design standards for this area during this time. The absence of ecological
See General Plan: Peripheral Areas C and D, City of Phoenix Planning Department, October
1987.
See City of Phoenix Planning Department Staff Report No. 58-01-02 (June 13, 2001),
recommending approval of the DMOD Overlay, at 2. Obtained via Public Records Request.
See FN 8 at 1.
See FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9 (p.2); see also FN 7; see also “ASU Program Stresses Ecological Approach to City
Planning”, University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center Newsletter, November-
December 1999, at 9.
See Ward, B., Burke, J., Ewan, J., Fish Ewan, R., Miller, W., Quay, R., Steiner, F. 1999. “A
Collaborative Approach to Planning.” ASU School of Planning & Landscape Architecture.
Page 1154
information about the Northern Sonoran Desert was quickly recognized as a major
barrier, 14 so the City turned to the North Sonoran Collaborative and Arizona State
University (ASU) School of Planning and Landscape Architecture to conduct this much-
needed work. The city funded a detailed study of the Cave Creek Wash by ASU, the
success of which led to several additional studies of other nearby washes. 15 The Cave
Creek Study also helped build momentum for the acquisition of 15,000 acres of Preserve
lands including along the Cave Creek Wash corridor.
As a result of these extensive studies, a radical departure in methodology was
forming. “Basing preservation boundaries on ecosystems rather than topography or land
ownership is new to Phoenix. In the past, boundaries did not reflect the ecological
systems inherent in the landscape and so the impact of preserve size, shape, and
constitution on plant and wildlife habitats were not considered nor well understood.” 16
These and other processes led directly to the North Land Use Plan (adopted 1996)
and the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (adopted 1998). Based in part on interviews with
neighbors in the area, the North Land Use Plan identified three Character Areas – the
Desert Preserve (today’s DMOD Overlay), the Rural Desert, and Suburban Desert – and
required that zoning overlay districts be created for each area “to provide clear
development standards which reflect community desires for each area.” 17
It is worth highlighting that the Desert Overlay development process was so unique
and ambitious that an entire session series of presentations were devoted to it at the 1999
American Planning Association’s National Conference held in Seattle, Washington. 18
Presenters included ASU professors, City of Phoenix Planning Deputy Director James
Burke, Assistant Director Ray Quay (all Collaborative members) who traveled from
Arizona to Washington to present their work to planners across the United States.
In a conference paper presented to planners nationwide, Terry Newton of the
Phoenix Planning Department noted that “the process for developing the three overlay
See FN 8.
This study was reportedly conducted by a team of ecologists and biologists from the ASU
Schools of Planning and Landscape Architecture and Life Sciences Department, Northern
Arizona University, the Desert Botanical Gardens, and the Arizona Game and Fish Department.
Their report on the biological values of Cave Creek Wash entitled “Cave Creek Wash:
Preservation Boundary Study” was published in 1996.
See Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (1998), at 16.
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 19.
See 1999 APA National Planning Conference file (WorldCat record); see 1999 APA National
Planning Conference Table of Contents (see Session Series on The North Sonoran Collaborative,
five papers linked).
Page 1155
ordinances is unlike any the city has undertaken in the past.” He continued, saying that
these guidelines could “set a new standard for the city’s approach to development in
natural desert areas for the city.” 19 He further described the specific acreage targeted for
protection:
“Much of the area identified by Subdistricts A and B is included in the
Arizona Preserve Initiative (API) application which is currently being
pursued by the city. Of the approximately 5,000 acres identified as
Subdistrict A, only 900 acres are outside of the API area. Subdistrict B
consists of approximately 1,700 acres with 1,500 acres falling outside of the
API area. Assuming the API area as currently identified successfully
becomes a preserve, approximately 2,400 acres in Subdistricts A and B
would remain for possible development. This is the area addressed by
this Overlay.” (Emphasis Added).
For reference, the current proposed rezoning applications submitted by developer
Taylor Morrison propose to remove approximately 218 acres of the 900 acres of
developable non-Preserve area from Subdistrict A, or about 24%. 20 While the number of
developable acreages may have shifted since this time, it is crucial to note that the
Overlay was developed to specifically target these developable acreages for protection
from intense development – including the intense residential development presented by
the “Verdin” project.
2000s
On June 13, 2001, the City Planning Commission met to consider and recommend
adoption of the DMOD Overlay to the City Council. On June 27, 2001, the City of Phoenix
granted the request as recommended, adopting the DMOD Overlay into the City Zoning
Ordinance. 21 Minutes from the June 13th Planning Commission hearing reveal the robust
community input and public involvement that supported writing the DMOD Overlay text. 22
Staff Report No. 58-01-2 23 recommending approval states:
See Newton, Terry, City of Phoenix Planning Department. Desert Character Overlay Zoning
District, Conference Paper presented to the American Planning Association, Seattle, WA. 1999.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 (March 9, 2022) at 12.
See FN 9. See also Application No. Z-TA-3-99-2 (to add the Desert Character Overlay District
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance); see Zoning Application No. Z-58-01-2 (establish the
Desert Maintenance Overlay District, one of three character districts authorized under Section
653); see Ordinance No. G-4380 and RCA35880 dated July 5, 2001 (adopting Ordinance).
See City of Phoenix Planning Commission Minutes (June 13, 2001) at 62; see also FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9.
Page 1156
“The area has a high scenic value containing stands of dense native
vegetation, which support a delicate and fragile eco-system. Within the
proposed overlay is Cave Creek Wash, a unique wash system which is
designated for incorporation into the City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. The
Desert Maintenance District is intended to provide a buffer/transition
between this environmentally sensitive area and existing
development. This is an area with many washes of varying size which are
tributaries to Cave Creek Wash. It is an area of high habitat value that is
critical to the survival of numerous small mammals and a variety of
birds, as well as reptiles. Maintenance of the Sonoran Desert in this
area requires sensitive development strategies.”
2001), recommending approval of Z-58-01-2 and Z-TA-3-99-2. (Emphasis
added).
The DMOD Overlay was codified in the Zoning Ordinance at Section 653. Within
its very first paragraph: “The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development.” 24
The DMOD Overlay is split into Subdistricts A and B. Subdistrict A requires
minimum lot sizes of 35,000 square feet or greater, or 0-1.2 dwelling units per acre. 25
Subdistrict B requires minimum lot sizes of 18,000 square feet or greater, or 2-5 dwelling
units per acre. 26 Section 653(A) explains why development densities are more restrictive
in Subdistrict A (where a portion of the proposed “Verdin” project lies and which is the
subject of the rezoning applications) as follows:
“With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and
intensity of residential development characterize this area. The
Desert Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with
regards to density allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the
fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low density development which may
be sited in clusters along with provision for an area to allow access to the
Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of development in this
See FN 5 at Section (A).
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(5); see also FN 9 at 3.
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(6); see also FN 9 at 3.
Page 1157
area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas and washes
becomes possible.”
The DMOD Overlay is the only one of these three overlays completed to date. For
reasons not stated, the remaining two Desert Character Overlay Districts (Rural Desert
Overlay, Sec. 653(C) and the Suburban Desert Overlay, Sec. 653(D)) were never added
to the Desert Character Overlay District (Sec. 653), but have remained “Reserved” for the
past two decades. 27
While development has continued throughout the city, the thoughtfully formulated
Overlay at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance has stood the test of time. Since adoption
in 2001, it has never been amended. However, granting the rezoning proposed by the
Taylor Morrison “Verdin” development to lift the DMOD Overlay will set a disastrous
precedent, allowing a developer to carve themselves out of the protective, robust Overlay
to facilitate their more dense (and thus more profitable) development plans. Removal of
these protections sets a chilling precedent for the survival of Sonoran Preserve and the
remaining acres of sensitive desert habitat and wash systems. The “Verdin” project
should not be exempted from the protective DMOD Overlay.
The “Technical Clean-Up” Road Alignment Argument Is Wrong
In a transparent effort to side step the powerful history and compelling reasoning
behind the Overlay, the developer claims that the requested rezonings (Z-75-18-2 and Z-
TA-5-18-2) to remove the DMOD Overlay from their property are just a “technical clean
ups” 28 to change the Overlay boundaries to align with Sonoran Desert Drive instead with
the Northeast Outer Loop alignment contemplated in the Peripheral Areas C & D Plan.
This is not true. The DMOD Overlay was never intended to move with any changes to the
proposed roadway.
The Sonoran Preserve Parkway route alignment involved a complex process that
included area residents, PMPC, the State Land Department, and Preserve and Parks
Committee study partners studying multiple alternatives. 29 After extensive public review,
one alignment was selected out of five. During a presentation to the Parks & Recreation
Board meeting, it was discussed that the selected Parkway alignment was chosen to
maintain existing wildlife corridors in the area, among other things. At the meeting Board
Chairperson Jim Holway asked “if there was a reason why the alignment had not been
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts), Subsections C & D.
See Letter from Susan Demmitt to Desert View Village Planner Julianna Pierre re Zoning Map
Amendment application Z-75-18-2 (December 17, 2021). Received via Public Records Request.
See Sonoran Desert Drive Alignment Study Fact Sheet.
Page 1158
brought to the edge of the preserve.” Staff and Parks & Preserve Administrator Sarah Hall
explained that this was due to “major wash crossings” in the area, among other things. 30
A City Council Report recommending approval of the final Sonoran Parkway
alignment similarly states: “Special care was taken to maintain views of the surrounding
terrain, minimize scarring, preserve existing vegetation, and provide for wildlife crossings.
Provisions for future trail crossings have been incorporated and structure designs include
aesthetic treatment with native colors and textures to blend into the adjacent desert
landscape. Segments of the alignment will abut future Mountain Preserve and serve as a
buffer between the Mountain Preserve and adjacent development.” 31
Never, in any part of the extensive Sonoran Parkway alignment review process,
was there ever a mention that the new alignment was intended to redraw the boundary
of the recently-adopted DMOD Overlay. Rather, the Sonoran Parkway alignment was not
intended to redraw the DMOD Overlay, it was intended to traverse it. The alignment was
specifically chosen to be harmonious with sensitive ecological features, not to pull back
protections for these features as the developer seems to suggest now.
Even the City of Phoenix 32 appears to reject the developer’s “technical clean-up”
roadway claim. Below (left) is the applicant’s proposed rezoning, reducing the DMOD
Overlay over a large swath. Below (right) is the City’s proposed modification, which
exempts just the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay. Plainly, from these maps, the
“technical clean-up” roadway claim does not stand.
See Phoenix Parks & Recreation Board Meeting Minutes (June 26, 2003) at 9-10.
See City Council Report, Transportation, Parks & Seniors Subcommittee (June 8, 2006).
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
Page 1159
The proposed “Verdin” project lie underneath Mesquite Wash, an important habitat
for many desert species, which runs through the heart of the property. Removal of the
DMOD Overlay would entirely remove the protections to Mesquite Wash. The “Verdin”
project would also intrude on Cave Creek Wash to the east, an important wildlife corridor
between the existing Preserve lands located to the north and south. A development more
dense than currently allowed would threaten the integrity and cut off connectivity of these
wildlife corridors. Indeed, one of the smallest birds native to the Sonoran Desert known
as the “Verdin” makes its home in wildlife corridors and washes including those that
would be threatened by the proposed “Verdin” development.
A blatant carve-out of the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay to enable
more dense development is inappropriate. This flies in the face of so many years of hard
work, thoughtful community input and public review, careful research, and proactive good
planning. It is directly contrary to the intent of the DMOD Overlay, which exists to
proactively protect the sensitive desert ecosystem from developmental pressures, not
react to their desires. It also sets an awful precedent, opening the doors for future
developers to make similar requests, rendering the DMOD Overlay effectively
meaningless.
II. ISSUES REGARDING PROCESS
Simultaneous Consideration of All Cases Is Not Permitted
These four applications were simultaneously presented on, discussed, and
approved for recommendation through a vote by the North Gateway Village Planning
Committee on March 10, 2022. 33 The Desert View Village Planning Committee is
scheduled to meet and take action on these “companion cases” on April 5, 2022. 34 This
is not permitted under City of Phoenix processes and the law.
The City of Phoenix’s General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide 35 notes
that simultaneous review of rezoning applications and requests to amend the General
Plan is prohibited. It specifically states:
May my rezoning application be reviewed simultaneously with my
application to amend the GENERAL PLAN?
No. Current City policy requires that action on a rezoning application is
separate from the procedure to amend the General Plan as State law
requires that all rezoning be consistent with and conform to the adopted
See FN 2.
See FN 3.
See City of Phoenix General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide (rev. 08/12/2021)
Page 1160
General Plan. A hearing on the rezoning application is to occur subsequent
to a determination on the change to the General Plan. However, you may
file your rezoning application and be scheduled for a hearing agenda
following action on the General Plan amendment. Note: This requirement
can be waived by the Planning and Development Director upon written
request for special circumstances.
General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide, at p.2
A.R.S. § 9-462.01(F) states in relevant part that “[a]ll zoning and rezoning
ordinances adopted under this article shall be consistent with and conform to the adopted
general plan of the municipality”. It is the intent of the Legislature that revisions to the
General Plan must occur prior to, not simultaneous with, zoning and rezonings. This is an
important process as it protects the integrity of the General Plan and the processes
involved in its revision, including (but not at all limited to), ongoing public notice and
participation.
Exceptions to this requirement have not occurred and do not apply here.
Scheduling of a hearing agenda following action on the General Plan is not occurring
here, as the Verdin Minor General Plan Amendment Submittal (Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2) admits that “[t]his Amendment is being processed concurrently with applications to
change the zoning on the Property…” 36 Finally, there has been no indication that
developer Taylor Morrison has ever requested a written waiver of this explicit
requirement.
In addition, the General Plan Amendment Planning Process makes clear that the
contents of a General Plan Amendment hearing and a Rezoning hearing are quite
different. 37 For instance, certain zoning issues are “not appropriate for discussion” at a
General Plan Amendment hearing, including setbacks, elevation, open space, amenities,
and other topics. Simultaneous consideration of all of these applications, and
consideration of all of these topics at one single hearing, is inappropriate and contrary to
Phoenix City policies and Arizona laws governing municipal planning.
All Procedures for the Cases Must Be Complied With
On December 7, 2021 and December 9, 2021, the four applications were
presented and discussed at the Desert View Village Planning Committee and the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee regular monthly meetings, respectively. 38 On
See Verdin Major General Plan Amendment Submittal (December 17, 2021), p.5 (obtained via
public records request).
See FN 34 at 2-3.
See Desert View Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 7, 2021); see
North Gateway Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 9, 2021).
Page 1161
December 17, 2021 and after these informational meetings, the General Plan
Amendment Application was resubmitted to the Planning & Development Department (the
first submittal having occurred over three years prior). 39 However, no further presentation
and discussion of this resubmittal occurred prior to voting meetings.
Neighborhood notification and meetings are also a requirement of the General
Plan Amendment process. Specifically, applicants are required to meet with property
owners within 600 feet of the subject site to present the proposal, and attempt to address
resident concerns. Furthermore, the General Plan Amendment Process Guide 40 requires:
“The results of that meeting shall be summarized and forwarded to the
village planner in whose village the case is located. No hearings shall be
scheduled without submittal of the following information:
x Date, time, and location of the meeting
x Number of participants
x Issues that arose during the meeting
x Plan to resolve the issues, if possible”
It is unclear whether this requirement has been met. Furthermore, if such a
meeting has occurred, it is important to determine whether the meeting occurred prior or
subsequent to the major resubmittal in December 2021. This is critical. Fundamental to
the planning process are ample, advance public notice allowing time for meaningful
review, engagement and participation.
For reasons stated above, the bundling of these four cases (rezoning applications,
request to amend the General Plan, and Planned Unit Development) is improper and
prohibited by the City of Phoenix’s own policy. Progression of these cases must stop on
this basis alone.
Public Review Opportunities Have Been Insufficient
The City of Phoenix Staff Report for Verdin PUD was not finalized until March 9,
2022, and was not posted on the Planned Unit Development Case List until just before
the North Gateway Village Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 41
Similarly, the City of Phoenix Staff Analysis for the General Plan Amendment was not
finalized until March 9, 2022. 42 Bafflingly, it is posted on the General Plan Amendment
See FN 35.
See FN 34.
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
See Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
Page 1162
Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022”, making it highly unlikely that an
interested citizen would easily be able to locate and review it (if they even knew it was
there). The City of Phoenix Staff Report for the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment was
also not finalized until March 9, 2022. 43 Also bafflingly, it is posted on the Rezoning &
Text Amendment Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022.” This stymies the
good-faith efforts of even the most persistent interested citizen, and certainly stifles public
participation.
Additionally, revisions to the Verdin PUD Narrative have repeatedly been
resubmitted by developer Taylor Morrison over the past three months. The most recent
resubmission was on March 3, 2022, a few short days before the North Gateway Village
Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 44 No notification of this updated
draft (or the specific changes it contains) was received in advance of the March 10th
meeting.
No notification or alert was ever received that these reports or updates were even
available, leaving no time for any meaningful public review (or even awareness of their
existence) prior to the first Village voting meeting. This is made more egregious by the
fact that there are significant public concerns with this development, which have been
repeatedly raised throughout the years. In fact, public concern about this project has been
expressed since the project was first proposed as “MacEwen 480” in 2018. 45 As the City
is likely aware, the organization known as Save Our Sonoran Preserve was formed by
residents in response to these very threats from this project and SOS has fiercely
advocated for protection of the Preserve and DMOD Overlay ever since.
Although the Public Meeting materials included allotted time for “Public
Comments”, this opportunity is not meaningful, when the public is not given sufficient time
to review the relevant documents in advance of key voting meetings. Proper time for
public participation and notice are required components of the public process for all of
these cases. As you know, A.R.S. § 9-461.06(C) directs municipalities to provide for
“effective, early and continuous public participation” with respect to General Plan
amendment processes.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
See Verdin PUD Narrative.
See “1,420 homes may line 9,671 acres of preserved north Phoenix desert” (AZCentral,
January 12, 2022); see “Hikers upset home builder may redevelop part of North Phoenix desert”
(AZFamily, February 28, 2022); see “Preserve at odds with high density housing” (Sonoran News,
May 15, 2019); see “Outdoor enthusiasts blast plan for 1,400 homes near Phoenix Sonoran
Preserve” (AZCentral, May 14, 2019).
Page 1163
Disclosing key materials on the same day as scheduled decision-making meetings
does not allow for meaningful public review and participation, and unfortunately, whether
or not intended, diminishes its importance. We sincerely hope that this will no longer be
the case moving forward.
III. CONCLUSION
The robust protections developed and codified in the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District have stood unaltered for the past 21 years. Erosion of these protections, if allowed
once, may not stop. Simply put, the Desert Maintenance Overlay District must be
preserved intact and not modified.
What we are asking for here is not radical. PMPC does not oppose a reasonable
development on the McEwen Ranch LLC property consistent with current development
standards and zoning requirements. Phoenix has already spoken with the approval of the
DMOD Overlay, which reflects the years of hard work put into development of the DMOD
Overlay by so many dedicated citizens and professionals.
Anything short of preserving the DMOD Overlay as-is will seriously degrade fragile
desert ecosystems in the area, sever connections between the Preserves, and set a
dangerous where developers can easily bypass important protections for our unique
landscapes across Phoenix.
Yours Truly,
Dr. Patrick McMullen, PhD, President
Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Email: pmpcaz@gmail.com
CC: Director, Phoenix City Planning & Development
Phoenix City Planning & Development Department (zoning@phoenix.gov)
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Executive Board, Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Page 1164
From: Sonoran Preserve
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: Re: Message to VPC Members
Date: Thursday, April 7, 2022 3:43:19 PM
Hi Julianna,
I wanted to say thank you for all your assistance for the past couple years on this project. Obviously, I’m a bit
heartbroken and feel very gutted about the result of the vote, in particular the removal of the Desert Character
Overlay, something that I have felt so passionately about.
I was hoping to post a recap to our members again so if you could forward the minutes when you get a
chance that would be appreciated.
Also can you forward the below letter to Desert View VPC members:
Dear Desert View VPC,
First, I want to thank you for all your attention to the MacEwan 480/Verdin project over the past several
years. It’s hard to believe that we were discussing this case since 2018. It is taxing enough for me to sit in on
those meetings every once in a while and you fine people do it for our community once a month! So thank
you for your time and service.
Second, obviously I’m a bit heartbroken and feel very gutted over the result of the vote this week. I put so
much time and effort in defending the Preserve and it’s zoning laws.
It seemed that back in 2018 and 2019 everyone was in unison (both Committee members and 82 letters that
you received in opposition) about how massive this up zone was, the location of this up zone and the asking
of the removal of limit line and the Desert Character overlay. It was sad to see peoples opinions changes.
Perhaps we’re all tired of hearing about it.
At any rate, please consider me an ally in helping preserve open places like the Sonoran Preserve and it’s
zoning laws. For me it’s the heart of what make Arizona and our beautiful village truly unique.
Sincerely,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas
708-369-4566
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
On Apr 5, 2022, at 8:20 AM, Julianna Pierre
Thank you for sending this over, Gary. I’ll make sure I have this updated version available.
Thank you,
Julianna Pierre, Planner II – Village Planner
Office: 602-534-5829
ʇ Planning & Development Department
Long Range Planning
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix
Page 1165
From: Council District 2 PCC
To: Julianna Pierre
Subject: FW: Verdin development proposal
Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 8:30:53 AM
Please add to the public record.
From: Ron Orozco
Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 8:25 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin development proposal
Dear Councilman Waring,
I’m writing to you today because I know you are a man of integrity and a man of the people. I had
the pleasure of meeting you a few times when you were the state senator from my district. I am
deeply concerned about the proposal Verdin development has on the table to basically ignore the
Desert Character Overlay District standards for development on lands adjoining the Sonoran
Preserve. This is literally my backyard now and the impact to the ecosystem of overdevelopment
would be irreversible. I am an avid trail runner with great respect for our desert home. This proposal
is a very bad idea and in direct conflict of the standards put in place to prevent overdevelopment. No
amount of ‘planning’ to build ‘conforming with the natural environment’ can make up for doubling
or tripling the number of homes in this area, and with future development almost assured, sets a
very bad precedent. In fact, it’s hypocritical. I urge you to do the right thing and deny this proposal.
Keep this area zoned as it was intended, and protect the environment and the livelihood of all who
currently live here and enjoy the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
Sincerely,
Ron Orozco
District 2 Republican
602-469-0715
Sent from my iPhone
*******
Page 1166
Attachment H
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
May 5, 2022
ITEM NO: 8
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-62-18-2 (Verdin PUD) (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-
2, and Z-TA-5-18-2)
Location: Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive
From: S-1 DCOD, RE-35 DCOD, and S-1
To: PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) and PUD
Acreage: 488.63
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow single-family residential
Applicant: Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
Owner: MacEwen Ranch, LLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 11/6/2018 Information only.
North Gateway 11/8/2018 Information only.
Desert View 4/2/2019 Information only.
Desert View 12/7/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 12/9/2021 Information only.
North Gateway 3/10/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation with a modification.
Vote: 4-1.
Desert View 4/5/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation with modifications and additional
stipulations. Vote: 10-1.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff memo dated May 5, 2022.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Simon made a MOTION to approve Z-62-18-2, per the staff
memo dated May 5, 2022.
Maker: Simon
Second: Busching
Vote: 7-1 (Perez)
Absent: Gaynor
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The proposed PUD is located directly adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and includes
standards that ensure appropriate transitions from the development to adjacent
preserve areas.
Page 1167
2. The proposal balances the need for additional housing, while retaining and preserving
the desert landscape throughout the development, as outlined in the North Land Use
Plan and Sonoran Preserve Master Plan.
3. The proposal includes several development standards, such as increased open edge
conditions, increased common area, and design guidelines that exceed conventional
Zoning Ordinance standards.
Stipulations:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD reflecting
the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development Narrative
date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022, as modified by the following
stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO REFLECT A
MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND A MAXIMUM
OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES 6, 8, 26, AND 28:
REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM DENSITY TO 2.6
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO REMOVE
THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6, 8, 26, AND 28:
REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS TO
1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO REFLECT A
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED ALONG THE
EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. THE OPEN
SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” –
NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA WITH PLANT MATERIALS FROM THE
VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST: GREEN LIST. PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59,
63, 75, 134, 135, AND 136: REMOVE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL – SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT
COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL SHALL BE
UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE
WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 119,
AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED PLANT
PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123, SECTION
9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD LANGUAGE
REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A PROVISION
FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO
COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN SPACE.
Page 1168
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT
THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS
AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH
THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
h Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent and/or
d. temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT DENSITY
THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS FOR THE
ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT REFERS TO THE
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN SECTION 4.C.
(REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT PROHIBITED BY
CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO
HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE ALLOWED…”
l. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.3.A: ADD THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE UNDER THE
EXISTING SENTENCE: “ANY WALLS OR FENCING ALONG A PRESERVE
EDGE/MCFCD PROPERTY BOUNDARY, OTHER THAN WALLS OR
FENCING FOR INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS, SHALL BE COMPRISED
OF THE BARRIER FENCING TYPE, WHICH ARE DESIGNED WITH
SUFFICIENT OPENINGS TO ALLOW THE REGULAR PASSAGE OF
WILDLIFE.”
m. PAGE 42, SECTION 6.3.B: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO ‘A MAXIMUM 6-
FOOT, 4-INCH HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING” TO ‘A MAXIMUM 5-FOOT HIGH
FULL VIEW FENCING’.
n. PAGE 46, SECTION 6.6: CHANGE ‘14 FEET’ TO ‘12 FEET’.
l.o. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC TRAIL
ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE WASH
CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER STIPULATION
NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS
EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
p. PAGE 79-80, SECTION 5.A, LAST BULLET POINT: ADD THE FOLLOWING
AFTER THE FIRST SENTENCE: “THE USE OF RETAINING WALLS IN
EXCESS OF 4 FEET IS DISCOURAGED AND SHOULD BE LIMITED TO
Page 1169
LOCATIONS WHERE NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE SPECIFIC SITE
TOPOGRAPHY.”
m.q. PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO THE YELLOW
LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
n.r. PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND ADD IT
TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
o.s. PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT. UPDATE
THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT
WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS
A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA.
p.t. PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. EXPLAIN THAT
THE AREA’S PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT PALETTE
GREEN LIST.
q.u. PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP MATRIX,
PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE AND
INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT WILLOW”
AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON PAGE 121.
r.v. PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP MATRIX,
PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE INFORMATION
REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF HACKBERRY” AND ADD
TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST ON PAGE 119.
s.w. PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT
FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING AND COPY IS 16
FEET…”
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant analysis for
development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as 7th Street and
Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all additional dedications
and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District (PCD), of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water Design
Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping,
Page 1170
and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS
FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS
THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON
EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED BY THE PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL CONNECTIONS SHALL
BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE)
ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 429 OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS
WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE EROSION HAZARD
SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY
SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF
PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND
APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH TIMING
OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY THE
DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to clearing
and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the Phase I
9. data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified archaeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct
Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER SHALL
BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
Page 1171
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION
FILE FOR RECORD.
13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BY EMAIL A
MINIMUM OF 15 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN REVIEW
MEETINGS WITH THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
PLANNING HEARING OFFICER REQUESTS TO MODIFY STIPULATIONS, OR ANY
ZONING ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS. THE NOTICE SHALL INCLUDE THE DATE,
TIME, AND LOCATION OF THE MEETING/HEARING.
A. DR. GARY KIRKILAS: GARYKIRKILAS@GMAIL.COM
B. MEMBERS OF THE PHOENIX SONORAN PRESERVE AND MOUNTAIN
PARKS/PRESERVES COMMITTEE
C VASHTI “TICE” SUPPLEE: VSUPPLEE25@GMAIL.COM
14. APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CONDITIONED
UPON THE FINAL EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER WITHIN 24 MONTHS OF CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE OF ZONE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT SHALL BE EXECUTED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL
AND ISSUANCE OF ANY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS. THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHALL AT A MINIMUM OUTLINE THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR INITIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO SONORAN DESERT DRIVE,
AS WELL AS FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ULTIMATE BUILDOUT OF
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 1172
ATTACHMENT I
To: City of Phoenix Planning Commission Date: May 5, 2022
From: Racelle Escolar, AICP
Principal Planner
Subject: ITEM NO. 8 (Z-62-18-2) – VERDIN PUD – SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
24TH STREET ALIGNMENT AND SONORAN DESERT DRIVE
The purpose of this is memo is to recommend additional stipulations and convey additional
correspondence that has been received regarding this case and its companion cases.
Rezoning Case No. Z-62-18-2 is a request to rezone 488.63 acres from S-1 DCOD
(Ranch or Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), RE-35 (Single-Family
Residence District) DCOD, and S-1. The requested zoning is PUD (Planned Unit
Development) DCOD (Pending PUD) and PUD for the Verdin PUD, to allow single-
family residential.
The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on March 10,
2022, and recommended approval with modifications by a 4-1 vote. The Desert View
VPC heard this request on April 5, 2022, and recommended approval with modifications
and additional stipulations by a 10-1 vote.
The applicant has agreed to reduce the maximum wall height standards in the PUD
Narrative and to require that any walls or fencing on the preserve edge have sufficient
openings to allow the passage of wildlife. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 1.l, m, n,
and p.
The applicant has also agreed to notifying specific individuals should there be future public
hearings applicable to the PUD area. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 13.
The Sonoran Desert Drive Roadway Corridor, including Sonoran Desert Drive from North
Valley Pkwy to Cave Creek Road and Dove Valley Road from 22nd Avenue to Sonoran
Desert Drive, will become a critical transportation conduit connecting northwest and
northeast Phoenix across the Sonoran Desert Preserve. Roadway improvements will be
needed within the corridor to ensure continued safe travel conditions as future new
development occurs in north Phoenix. Staff is recommending a stipulation to require a
development agreement that will set forth the terms by which Verdin will contribute a fair
share toward the necessary roadway improvements. This is addressed in Stipulation No.
14.
Enclosed with this memo are three letter of support and eight letters of opposition,
including a petition.
Page 1173
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
Staff recommends approval, subject to the stipulations below:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with
the Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3,
2022, as modified by the following stipulations:
a. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MAXIMUM OVERALL UNIT COUNT OF 1,250 UNITS AND
A MAXIMUM OVERALL DENSITY OF 2.6 UNITS PER ACRE.. PAGES
6, 8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
DENSITY TO 2.6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.
b. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REMOVE THE SMALL LOT (SFR-3) LAND USE DISTRICT. PAGES 6,
8, 26, AND 28: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE MAXIMUM
NUMBER OF UNITS TO 1,250 DWELLING UNITS.
c. MODIFY THE VERDIN PUD DOCUMENT AS NECESSARY TO
REFLECT A MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE VERDIN PROPERTY
TO PROVIDE A TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH
CORRIDOR. THE OPEN SPACE TRACT SHALL BE CONSIDERED A
CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” – NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA
WITH PLANT MATERIALS FROM THE VERDIN PUD PLANT LIST:
GREEN LIST. PAGES 23, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36, 59, 63, 75, 134, 135, AND
136: REMOVE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL – SMALL LOT (SFR-3)” LAND USE DISTRICT. UNIT
COUNTS AND PERCENTAGES RELATED TO THIS REMOVAL
SHALL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
d. PAGES 20, 52, 61, 102, AND 113: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO
THE WIDTH OF THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TO 30-FEET-WIDE.
e. PAGES 51, 71, 75, 76, 83, 86, 87, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110,
119, AND 121: REVISE ALL REFERENCES TO THE “APPROVED
PLANT PALETTE” TO “PLANT PALETTE”.
f. PAGES 8-22, SECTION 2. LAND USE PLAN, AND PAGES 97-123,
SECTION 9. CERTIFIED OPEN SPACE DESIGN GUIDELINES: ADD
LANGUAGE REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 16
ACRES ADDRESSED IN STIPULATION NO. 8. THERE SHALL BE A
PROVISION FOR BOTH ON SITE OPEN SPACE AND THE
DEDICATED 16 ACRES TO COUNT TOWARDS TOTAL OPEN
SPACE.
Page 1174
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
g. PAGE 16, OFF-SITE CONNECTIVITY: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING
PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE
MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO
PATHS, PER STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHALL
SPECIFICALLY NOTE THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL
ENSURE PERMANENT PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT
UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
h Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent
d. and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or
consumption;”
i. PAGE 35, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A ROW AFTER MAX. DWELLING UNIT
DENSITY THAT READS “MAXIMUM UNITS: 1,250 DWELLING UNITS
FOR THE ENTIRE PUD AREA”.
j. PAGES 36-37, SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT
REFERS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION TABLE IN
SECTION 4.C. (REGULATORY STANDARDS & LAND USE
DISTRICTS – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) FOR THE MAXIMUM
UNIT COUNTS FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.
k. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.1: REVISE TO READ, “WHEN NOT
PROHIBITED BY CITY CODE, SECTION 31-13, PRIMARY
ORNAMENTAL ENTRIES NO HIGHER THAN 16-FEET ARE
ALLOWED…”
l. PAGE 41, SECTION 6.3.A: ADD THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE
UNDER THE EXISTING SENTENCE: “ANY WALLS OR FENCING
ALONG A PRESERVE EDGE/MCFCD PROPERTY BOUNDARY,
OTHER THAN WALLS OR FENCING FOR INDIVIDUAL
RESIDENTIAL LOTS, SHALL BE COMPRISED OF THE BARRIER
FENCING TYPE, WHICH ARE DESIGNED WITH SUFFICIENT
OPENINGS TO ALLOW THE REGULAR PASSAGE OF WILDLIFE.”
m. PAGE 42, SECTION 6.3.B: REVISE THE REFERENCE TO ‘A
MAXIMUM 6-FOOT, 4-INCH HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING” TO ‘A
MAXIMUM 5-FOOT HIGH FULL VIEW FENCING’.
n. PAGE 46, SECTION 6.6: CHANGE ‘14 FEET’ TO ‘12 FEET’.
l.o. PAGES 52-53, SECTION 2.C: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING PUBLIC
TRAIL ACCESS EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE MESQUITE
WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS, PER
Page 1175
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
STIPULATION NO. 6. THE SECTION SHOULD SPECIFICALLY NOTE
THAT THE ACCESS EASEMENTS WILL ENSURE PERMANENT
PUBLIC ACCESS AND RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR
VEHICLE ACCESS THROUGH THE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY TO
THE SONORAN PRESERVE.
p. PAGE 79-80, SECTION 5.A, LAST BULLET POINT: ADD THE
FOLLOWING AFTER THE FIRST SENTENCE: “THE USE OF
RETAINING WALLS IN EXCESS OF 4 FEET IS DISCOURAGED AND
SHOULD BE LIMITED TO LOCATIONS WHERE NECESSARY TO
ACCOMMODATE SPECIFIC SITE TOPOGRAPHY.”
m.q. PAGES 90-91, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS –
DESERT WILLOW” TREE FROM THE GREEN LIST AND ADD IT TO
THE YELLOW LIST TREES ON PAGE 91.
n.r. PAGES 90 AND 92, SECTION 6.H: DELETE “CELTIS RETICULATA –
NETLEAF HACKBERRY” SHRUB FROM THE YELLOW LIST AND
ADD IT TO THE GREEN LIST SHRUBS ON PAGE 90.
o.s. PAGE 101, CERTIFIED AREA OPEN SPACE TYPES EXHIBIT.
UPDATE THE EXHIBIT TO INCLUDE THE 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE
TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EASTERN
BOUNDARY OF THE SITE AS A CERTIFIED AREA TYPE “B” –
NATURAL REVEGETATED AREA.
p.t. PAGE 105-108, SECTION 1.D.2: ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING THE
MINIMUM 25-FOOT OPEN SPACE TRACT THAT WILL BE PROVIDED
ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE A
TRANSITION TO THE CAVE CREEK WASH CORRIDOR. EXPLAIN
THAT THE AREA’S PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE FROM THE PLANT
PALETTE GREEN LIST.
q.u. PAGES 119 AND 121, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
AND INFORMATION REGARDING “CHILOPSIS LINEARIS – DESERT
WILLOW” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST ON
PAGE 121.
r.v. PAGES 119 AND 122, 1.E. PLANT AND WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP
MATRIX, PLANT PALETTE: YELLOW LIST: REMOVE THE IMAGE
INFORMATION REGARDING “CELTIS RETICULATA – NETLEAF
HACKBERRY” AND ADD TO THE PLANT PALETTE: GREEN LIST ON
PAGE 119.
s.w. PAGE 123, SECTION 10.1.B: REVISE TO READ, “THE MAXIMUM
HEIGHT FOR PRIMARY ORNAMENTAL ENTRY SIGN LETTERING
AND COPY IS 16 FEET…”
Page 1176
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall provide signal warrant
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as
7th Street and Dove Valley Road. The developer will be responsible for all
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified
by the approved study.
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX PARKS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC TRAIL ACCESS
EASEMENTS FOR THE MESQUITE WASH CORRIDOR TRAIL AND
COMMUNITY PASEO PATHS THAT PROVIDE CONNECTION TO THE
SONORAN PRESERVE AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 6, PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION PLAN, IN THE PUD DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT
NARRATIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
RESTRICT UNAUTHORIZED MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESS, AS APPROVED
BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE LOCATION AND DESIGN OF TRAIL
CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN AN AVERAGE 30-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL
EASEMENT (MUTE) ALONG THE MESQUITE WASH IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 429 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX MAG SUPPLEMENTAL
DETAIL, AS MODIFIED TO ADDRESS WASH CORRIDOR CONSTRAINTS
AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONVEY APPROXIMATELY 16 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE WITHIN THE
EROSION HAZARD SETBACK AREA ALONG THE CAVE CREEK WASH
Page 1177
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
CORRIDOR, AS GENERALLY SHOWN ON EXHIBIT 11 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE, TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX FOR INCLUSION
IN THE SONORAN PRESERVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE FINAL ACREAGE AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED, ALONG WITH
TIMING OF THE CONVEYANCE, SHALL BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON BY
THE DEVELOPER, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT, AND
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
9 If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
8. conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
10 If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
9. Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
11 In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
10. developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.
13. THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS BY
EMAIL A MINIMUM OF 15 DAYS PRIOR TO ANY PRELIMINARY SITE
PLAN REVIEW MEETINGS WITH THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, PLANNING HEARING OFFICER REQUESTS TO MODIFY
STIPULATIONS, OR ANY ZONING ADJUSTMENT REQUESTS. THE
NOTICE SHALL INCLUDE THE DATE, TIME AND LOCATION OF THE
MEETING/HEARING.
A. DR. GARY KIRKILAS: GARYKIRKILAS@GMAIL.COM
B. MEMBERS OF THE PHOENIX SONORAN PRESERVE AND
MOUNTAIN PARKS/PRESERVES COMMITTEE
C VASHTI “TICE” SUPPLEE: VSUPPLEE25@GMAIL.COM
14. APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE
CONDITIONED UPON THE FINAL EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT
Page 1178
Z-62-18-2 Planning Commission Backup Memo
May 5, 2022
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER WITHIN 24
MONTHS OF CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE OF
ZONE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE
EXECUTED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF
ANY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS. THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT SHALL AT A MINIMUM OUTLINE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
INITIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS WELL AS
FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE ULTIMATE BUILDOUT OF
SONORAN DESERT DRIVE, AS MODIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTS.
Enclosures:
Correspondence (80 pages)
Page 1179
LW VENTURE, LLC
9393 N 90th St., Ste. 102, Box 125
Scottsdale, AZ 85258
Telephone (480) 305-4609
Cameron@mac-cre.com
April 27, 2022
Via Email : julianna.pierre@phoenix.gov
Ms. Julianna Pierre
City Village Planner
Re: Taylor Morrison Arizona, Inc.
Case Nos.: Z-62-18-2, GPA-DSTV-1-18-2,
Z-TA-5-18-2 & Z-75-18-2
Dear Ms. Pierre:
As the new owner of Tatum Ranch Crossing, we support approval of the zoning changes
being requested by Taylor Morrison for the master planned residential community to be known
DV³9HUGLQ´
Please direct all future correspondence and/or notices to my email or physical address
mentioned above.
Sincerely,
LW Venture, LLC
An Arizona Limited Liability Company
By: NCW Property A, LLC,
Property Manager
_______________________________
Cameron Wilson
DCL/bgr
cc: Ellie Brundige
Gammage & Burnham, P.L.C.
Email: ebrundige@gblaw.com
Page 1180
From: PDD Zoning
To: Racelle Escolar
Cc: Julianna Pierre; Sarah Stockham; Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject: FW: PMPC letters regarding Verdin zoning
Date: Monday, May 2, 2022 3:57:42 PM
Attachments: PMPC Cover Letter_Legal Research on DCOD_April 3 2022 (004).pdf
PMPC Letter to City of Phoenix re VERDIN Applications_Final Draft (004).pdf
Hello see below and attached.
Thank You
Leonor Valenzuela Secretary III
Planning and Development - Zoning Section
200 West Washington Street 2nd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
From: libby@fivewest.com
Sent: May 2, 2022 3:03 PM
To: Alan Stephenson
Subject: PMPC letters regarding Verdin zoning
Our attached letters from Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council (PMPC) relate to the zoning
change request regarding the Verdin development.
Elizabeth (Libby) Goff
PMPC Secretary
Libby@fivewest.com
602-758-3062
Page 1181
PMPC SUMMARY - APRIL 3, 2022
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization charged
with the protection of the Phoenix Mountains Preserves write to you with our strong
support and encouragement to engage and monitor the Verdin Development of the 480
acres situated to the west of Cave Creek Wash and to the south of the Sonoran Parkway.
The Verdin location abuts to Sonoran Preserve.
The attached legal research conducted by the PMPC Attorney, lists our concerns and we
hope that you and City departments will continue to take them seriously and will apply the
sections of the zoning Ordinance that were written and included into the Ordinance to
protect these Preserve adjacencies and to ensure that the Preserves will remain available
to the public and enjoyable as well.
PMPC understands that Phoenix is a rapidly growing city and that large numbers of the
new population must be accommodated. A great effort was undertaken in past decades
to have the Sonoran Preserve acquired by the City at tax payer expense, with a large
effort by PMPC to identify and help to support the City efforts. We therefore are very
dedicated to keeping the Preserves available to the local citizens, and the Desert
Character Overlay continued and appreciated.
The Verdin Development planning team has taken important steps in the linking up of the
Sonoran Preserves, emphasis on desert plant maintenance, protection of plants and
animals, and meaningful public access to the Desert Preserves surrounding the new
Verdin development. What is needed is a more formal arrangement between the City of
Phoenix, Phoenix Citizens and the Verdin 480 Acre Development project team.
As a remembrance; On February 17, 1998, the [City] Council also voted unanimously to
adopt the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan and to move forward in acquiring this open
space. In doing so, the Council continues a time-honored precedent for protecting and
preserving desert open space within the city and for ensuring recreational access for our
citizens.”
PMPC is intensely interested in the pending development of the Verdin 480 acre site, as
it is an early project in the development of this corridor, and especially important for the
continued Desert character Overlay District enforcement.
Sincerely,
Patrick McMullen, PhD
Patrick McMullen, PhD
PMPC President
Page 1182
March 31, 2022
Mayor Kate Gallego Phoenix City Councilmembers
Phoenix City Hall Phoenix City Hall
200 W. Washington St. 200 W. Washington St.
Phoenix, AZ 85003 Phoenix, AZ 85003
Re: Objections of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. (PMPC) to
the Four Applications Submitted for “Verdin” Development Proposal (GPA-
DSTV-1-18-2, Z-75-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2 and Z-62-18-2)
Dear Mayor Gallego:
This letter is submitted by the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc.
(PMPC) in opposition to the proposed Taylor Morrison “Verdin” housing development
project south of Sonoran Desert Drive between the 16th Street and 32nd Street alignments,
just west of Cave Creek Road in northern Phoenix (formerly “MacEwen 480”). We
understand that developer Taylor Morrison has filed several applications in furtherance
of this development including two zoning amendments, a General Plan Amendment, and
a Planned Unit Development application (hereinafter the “four applications”). 1 We
understand that these four applications were simultaneously approved by the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee on March 10, 2022 2, and the Desert View Village
Planning Committee is scheduled to meet on these four applications on April 5, 2022. 3
PMPC strongly objects to any actions, at any level, that would advance the four
applications as written, for reasons stated herein. First – the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District should not be modified but must remain intact, ensuring that washes, sensitive
species and their habitats, and the delicate desert ecosystem remain protected. The
rezoning is not simply a “technical clean-up” as the developer casually asserts, 4 but
rather, this rezoning would be an unprecedented rollback of protections carefully
researched and thoughtfully added to the Phoenix Zoning Code for this specific area
decades ago – protections that were specifically adopted to protect this desert area from
the very type of development pressure that is presented here. Second – simultaneous
consideration and approval of these four applications is contrary to the law and City of
Phoenix policy. Furthermore, public notice has been deficient.
General Plan Amendment (GPA-DSTV-1-18-2); Zoning Amendments (Z-75-18-2 and Z-75-5-
18); and Planned Unit Development (Z-62-18-2).
See Notice of Results, North Gateway Village Planning Committee Meeting (March 10, 2022).
See Notice of Public Meeting, Desert View Village Planning Committee (April 5, 2022).
See Letter re Z-75-18-2 Zoning Map Amendment (December 17, 2021), p.2
Page 1183
On behalf of PMPC, I ask that these applications not be approved as written but
that the Desert Maintenance Overlay District remain wholly intact, ensuring that
protections to washes, sensitive species and their habitats, and the delicate desert
ecosystem remain as intended.
About PMPC
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, Inc. is an organization founded in
1970 by Arizona visionaries dedicated to the protection of Phoenix’s Mountain Preserve
system. For the last 50 years, PMPC and its members have worked tirelessly to preserve,
protect, and advocate for the precious Mountain Preserve system, and to monitor and
address the rapid growth and development surrounding these important public resources.
For much of Phoenix’s modern history, our PMPC membership has worked hard
alongside hundreds of concerned Phoenix citizens and City staff to ensure that the
Sonoran Desert Preserves are protected and maintained as a valuable resource for all
citizens of Phoenix.
I. The Desert Maintenance Overlay District Must Not Be Altered
For many decades, protecting and preserving the unique desert features of the
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and the surrounding area has been a priority for the City of
Phoenix. The PMPC and its members were involved in and supported the development
and adoption of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (“DMOD” or “DMOD Overlay”)
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance in 2001, and the related working groups and
charettes involved with that process, as well as the formation and expansion of the
Phoenix Mountain Preserves. We support the critical protections carefully enacted by the
outlined in the DMOD Overlay, which must remain intact.
The true history of how the DMOD Overlay was developed is compelling. It is a
landmark instance of how land planning and landscape ecological principles can be
integrated as part of policy drafting processes. It should be a point of pride for the City of
Phoenix, and an asset worth protecting. Furthermore, the history shows that the DMOD
Overlay area and its boundaries were not simply dictated by road alignments (as the
developer incorrectly claims), but instead were carefully studied and thoughtfully drafted
in a manner integrating ecological considerations with planning structure, as part of one
of the most robust and widely supported Phoenix endeavors, to date. Finally, the owner(s)
of the “Verdin” property have owned this land for at least the last half-century, and have
had ample time and opportunities to challenge its classification over the last several
decades. The DMOD Overlay must not be altered.
Page 1184
History of the Desert Maintenance Overlay District (DMOD)
On July 5, 2001, the approximately 6,724-acre DMOD was added to the Phoenix City
Zoning Ordinance at Section 653 (Sub-Districts A & B), shown on the following page. 5
It was carefully constructed by a large, interdisciplinary collaborative effort over
several years to study and understand the unique and sensitive characteristics of this
area, and protect those characteristics from the pressures of development. Historical city
documents and studies, reports, articles, and other research materials describe this
history, as summarized below.
1980s
On January 19, 1985, a large portion of northern Phoenix (including the current
DMOD Overlay area) was annexed into the city. 6 Tensions between increasing
development and impacts on sensitive desert areas were rising during this time. Spurred
in part by these tensions and concerns over the proposed development at Tatum Ranch, 7
the City Council developed a plan for this larger area, then called the peripheral Areas C
and D Areas, with “extensive” community assistance from a Council-appointed Citizen’s
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts).
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 4; see also City of Phoenix Annexation Map.
See Quay, Ray. “Bridging the Gap Between Ecological Research and Land Use Policy: The
North Sonoran Collaborative” Urban Ecosystems, 7:283-294 (2004). Tatum Ranch was one of
the first developments to use groundwater and wastewater, opening the doors for more
development north of the CAP canal.
Page 1185
Advisory Committee, as well as support from the State. 8 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan
was adopted in 1987.
The Peripheral Areas C and D Plan was intended to direct the City of Phoenix on
future land use and development densities “to ensure that development in the area was
compatible with and complementary to the unique and environmentally sensitive
characteristics of the area.” 9 The Peripheral Areas C & D Plan describes this new
proactive approach: “Normally, the City is placed in a reactive role with respect to guiding
growth of a developing area. These northern areas; however, are largely undeveloped
and provide the City with a unique opportunity to anticipate growth and to establish an
overall framework to guide physical development.”10 Even at the time, the City recognized
that more work would be needed towards developing future protections, such as an
ordinance. 11
1990s
Development continued to increase in northern Phoenix during the early 1990s.
Subsequently, concerns about density and form of development within the ecologically
sensitive desert areas came to a critical point. A diverse group of public and private
planners, designers, environmental scientists, landscape architects, university
departments, as well as representatives from state agencies, private consultants, the City
of Phoenix, and State of Arizona began collaborating on a variety of studies, plans, and
charrettes for this area during this time. 12 This group (called the North Sonoran
Collaborative), formed and met regularly to address the gap between managing growth
and the ecological data needed to accomplish these goals. Their research was organized
into a multi-disciplinary GIS database, 13 one of the early instances of GIS usage by the
city and significant part of the group’s success.
The City of Phoenix began the process of revising the General Plan with detailed
objectives and design standards for this area during this time. The absence of ecological
See General Plan: Peripheral Areas C and D, City of Phoenix Planning Department, October
1987.
See City of Phoenix Planning Department Staff Report No. 58-01-02 (June 13, 2001),
recommending approval of the DMOD Overlay, at 2. Obtained via Public Records Request.
See FN 8 at 1.
See FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9 (p.2); see also FN 7; see also “ASU Program Stresses Ecological Approach to City
Planning”, University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center Newsletter, November-
December 1999, at 9.
See Ward, B., Burke, J., Ewan, J., Fish Ewan, R., Miller, W., Quay, R., Steiner, F. 1999. “A
Collaborative Approach to Planning.” ASU School of Planning & Landscape Architecture.
Page 1186
information about the Northern Sonoran Desert was quickly recognized as a major
barrier, 14 so the City turned to the North Sonoran Collaborative and Arizona State
University (ASU) School of Planning and Landscape Architecture to conduct this much-
needed work. The city funded a detailed study of the Cave Creek Wash by ASU, the
success of which led to several additional studies of other nearby washes. 15 The Cave
Creek Study also helped build momentum for the acquisition of 15,000 acres of Preserve
lands including along the Cave Creek Wash corridor.
As a result of these extensive studies, a radical departure in methodology was
forming. “Basing preservation boundaries on ecosystems rather than topography or land
ownership is new to Phoenix. In the past, boundaries did not reflect the ecological
systems inherent in the landscape and so the impact of preserve size, shape, and
constitution on plant and wildlife habitats were not considered nor well understood.” 16
These and other processes led directly to the North Land Use Plan (adopted 1996)
and the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (adopted 1998). Based in part on interviews with
neighbors in the area, the North Land Use Plan identified three Character Areas – the
Desert Preserve (today’s DMOD Overlay), the Rural Desert, and Suburban Desert – and
required that zoning overlay districts be created for each area “to provide clear
development standards which reflect community desires for each area.” 17
It is worth highlighting that the Desert Overlay development process was so unique
and ambitious that an entire session series of presentations were devoted to it at the 1999
American Planning Association’s National Conference held in Seattle, Washington. 18
Presenters included ASU professors, City of Phoenix Planning Deputy Director James
Burke, Assistant Director Ray Quay (all Collaborative members) who traveled from
Arizona to Washington to present their work to planners across the United States.
In a conference paper presented to planners nationwide, Terry Newton of the
Phoenix Planning Department noted that “the process for developing the three overlay
See FN 8.
This study was reportedly conducted by a team of ecologists and biologists from the ASU
Schools of Planning and Landscape Architecture and Life Sciences Department, Northern
Arizona University, the Desert Botanical Gardens, and the Arizona Game and Fish Department.
Their report on the biological values of Cave Creek Wash entitled “Cave Creek Wash:
Preservation Boundary Study” was published in 1996.
See Sonoran Preserve Master Plan (1998), at 16.
See North Land Use Plan (May 1997), at 19.
See 1999 APA National Planning Conference file (WorldCat record); see 1999 APA National
Planning Conference Table of Contents (see Session Series on The North Sonoran Collaborative,
five papers linked).
Page 1187
ordinances is unlike any the city has undertaken in the past.” He continued, saying that
these guidelines could “set a new standard for the city’s approach to development in
natural desert areas for the city.” 19 He further described the specific acreage targeted for
protection:
“Much of the area identified by Subdistricts A and B is included in the
Arizona Preserve Initiative (API) application which is currently being
pursued by the city. Of the approximately 5,000 acres identified as
Subdistrict A, only 900 acres are outside of the API area. Subdistrict B
consists of approximately 1,700 acres with 1,500 acres falling outside of the
API area. Assuming the API area as currently identified successfully
becomes a preserve, approximately 2,400 acres in Subdistricts A and B
would remain for possible development. This is the area addressed by
this Overlay.” (Emphasis Added).
For reference, the current proposed rezoning applications submitted by developer
Taylor Morrison propose to remove approximately 218 acres of the 900 acres of
developable non-Preserve area from Subdistrict A, or about 24%. 20 While the number of
developable acreages may have shifted since this time, it is crucial to note that the
Overlay was developed to specifically target these developable acreages for protection
from intense development – including the intense residential development presented by
the “Verdin” project.
2000s
On June 13, 2001, the City Planning Commission met to consider and recommend
adoption of the DMOD Overlay to the City Council. On June 27, 2001, the City of Phoenix
granted the request as recommended, adopting the DMOD Overlay into the City Zoning
Ordinance. 21 Minutes from the June 13th Planning Commission hearing reveal the robust
community input and public involvement that supported writing the DMOD Overlay text. 22
Staff Report No. 58-01-2 23 recommending approval states:
See Newton, Terry, City of Phoenix Planning Department. Desert Character Overlay Zoning
District, Conference Paper presented to the American Planning Association, Seattle, WA. 1999.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 (March 9, 2022) at 12.
See FN 9. See also Application No. Z-TA-3-99-2 (to add the Desert Character Overlay District
at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance); see Zoning Application No. Z-58-01-2 (establish the
Desert Maintenance Overlay District, one of three character districts authorized under Section
653); see Ordinance No. G-4380 and RCA35880 dated July 5, 2001 (adopting Ordinance).
See City of Phoenix Planning Commission Minutes (June 13, 2001) at 62; see also FN 9 at 2.
See FN 9.
Page 1188
“The area has a high scenic value containing stands of dense native
vegetation, which support a delicate and fragile eco-system. Within the
proposed overlay is Cave Creek Wash, a unique wash system which is
designated for incorporation into the City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. The
Desert Maintenance District is intended to provide a buffer/transition
between this environmentally sensitive area and existing
development. This is an area with many washes of varying size which are
tributaries to Cave Creek Wash. It is an area of high habitat value that is
critical to the survival of numerous small mammals and a variety of
birds, as well as reptiles. Maintenance of the Sonoran Desert in this
area requires sensitive development strategies.”
2001), recommending approval of Z-58-01-2 and Z-TA-3-99-2. (Emphasis
added).
The DMOD Overlay was codified in the Zoning Ordinance at Section 653. Within
its very first paragraph: “The Desert Maintenance, Rural Desert and Suburban Desert
Overlay Districts are designed in response to existing undisturbed conditions and
pressures placed on them by increased development.” 24
The DMOD Overlay is split into Subdistricts A and B. Subdistrict A requires
minimum lot sizes of 35,000 square feet or greater, or 0-1.2 dwelling units per acre. 25
Subdistrict B requires minimum lot sizes of 18,000 square feet or greater, or 2-5 dwelling
units per acre. 26 Section 653(A) explains why development densities are more restrictive
in Subdistrict A (where a portion of the proposed “Verdin” project lies and which is the
subject of the rezoning applications) as follows:
“With the many washes to be maintained in an undisturbed condition
crossing this area, Subdistrict A is intended to provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density. A very low density, scale and
intensity of residential development characterize this area. The
Desert Maintenance Overlay Subdistrict A is the least intensive with
regards to density allowed and the most restrictive in order to maintain the
fragile undisturbed areas and the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek
Wash. Subdistrict B is characterized by low density development which may
be sited in clusters along with provision for an area to allow access to the
Cave Buttes Recreational Area. Through clustering of development in this
See FN 5 at Section (A).
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(5); see also FN 9 at 3.
See FN 5 at Section 653(B)(6); see also FN 9 at 3.
Page 1189
area the ability to maintain large connected undisturbed areas and washes
becomes possible.”
The DMOD Overlay is the only one of these three overlays completed to date. For
reasons not stated, the remaining two Desert Character Overlay Districts (Rural Desert
Overlay, Sec. 653(C) and the Suburban Desert Overlay, Sec. 653(D)) were never added
to the Desert Character Overlay District (Sec. 653), but have remained “Reserved” for the
past two decades. 27
While development has continued throughout the city, the thoughtfully formulated
Overlay at Section 653 of the Zoning Ordinance has stood the test of time. Since adoption
in 2001, it has never been amended. However, granting the rezoning proposed by the
Taylor Morrison “Verdin” development to lift the DMOD Overlay will set a disastrous
precedent, allowing a developer to carve themselves out of the protective, robust Overlay
to facilitate their more dense (and thus more profitable) development plans. Removal of
these protections sets a chilling precedent for the survival of Sonoran Preserve and the
remaining acres of sensitive desert habitat and wash systems. The “Verdin” project
should not be exempted from the protective DMOD Overlay.
The “Technical Clean-Up” Road Alignment Argument Is Wrong
In a transparent effort to side step the powerful history and compelling reasoning
behind the Overlay, the developer claims that the requested rezonings (Z-75-18-2 and Z-
TA-5-18-2) to remove the DMOD Overlay from their property are just a “technical clean
ups” 28 to change the Overlay boundaries to align with Sonoran Desert Drive instead with
the Northeast Outer Loop alignment contemplated in the Peripheral Areas C & D Plan.
This is not true. The DMOD Overlay was never intended to move with any changes to the
proposed roadway.
The Sonoran Preserve Parkway route alignment involved a complex process that
included area residents, PMPC, the State Land Department, and Preserve and Parks
Committee study partners studying multiple alternatives. 29 After extensive public review,
one alignment was selected out of five. During a presentation to the Parks & Recreation
Board meeting, it was discussed that the selected Parkway alignment was chosen to
maintain existing wildlife corridors in the area, among other things. At the meeting Board
Chairperson Jim Holway asked “if there was a reason why the alignment had not been
See Zoning Ordinance Section 653 (Desert Character Overlay Districts), Subsections C & D.
See Letter from Susan Demmitt to Desert View Village Planner Julianna Pierre re Zoning Map
Amendment application Z-75-18-2 (December 17, 2021). Received via Public Records Request.
See Sonoran Desert Drive Alignment Study Fact Sheet.
Page 1190
brought to the edge of the preserve.” Staff and Parks & Preserve Administrator Sarah Hall
explained that this was due to “major wash crossings” in the area, among other things. 30
A City Council Report recommending approval of the final Sonoran Parkway
alignment similarly states: “Special care was taken to maintain views of the surrounding
terrain, minimize scarring, preserve existing vegetation, and provide for wildlife crossings.
Provisions for future trail crossings have been incorporated and structure designs include
aesthetic treatment with native colors and textures to blend into the adjacent desert
landscape. Segments of the alignment will abut future Mountain Preserve and serve as a
buffer between the Mountain Preserve and adjacent development.”31
Never, in any part of the extensive Sonoran Parkway alignment review process,
was there ever a mention that the new alignment was intended to redraw the boundary
of the recently-adopted DMOD Overlay. Rather, the Sonoran Parkway alignment was not
intended to redraw the DMOD Overlay, it was intended to traverse it. The alignment was
specifically chosen to be harmonious with sensitive ecological features, not to pull back
protections for these features as the developer seems to suggest now.
Even the City of Phoenix 32 appears to reject the developer’s “technical clean-up”
roadway claim. Below (left) is the applicant’s proposed rezoning, reducing the DMOD
Overlay over a large swath. Below (right) is the City’s proposed modification, which
exempts just the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay. Plainly, from these maps, the
“technical clean-up” roadway claim does not stand.
See Phoenix Parks & Recreation Board Meeting Minutes (June 26, 2003) at 9-10.
See City Council Report, Transportation, Parks & Seniors Subcommittee (June 8, 2006).
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
Page 1191
The proposed “Verdin” project lie underneath Mesquite Wash, an important habitat
for many desert species, which runs through the heart of the property. Removal of the
DMOD Overlay would entirely remove the protections to Mesquite Wash. The “Verdin”
project would also intrude on Cave Creek Wash to the east, an important wildlife corridor
between the existing Preserve lands located to the north and south. A development more
dense than currently allowed would threaten the integrity and cut off connectivity of these
wildlife corridors. Indeed, one of the smallest birds native to the Sonoran Desert known
as the “Verdin” makes its home in wildlife corridors and washes including those that
would be threatened by the proposed “Verdin” development.
A blatant carve-out of the “Verdin” property from the DMOD Overlay to enable
more dense development is inappropriate. This flies in the face of so many years of hard
work, thoughtful community input and public review, careful research, and proactive good
planning. It is directly contrary to the intent of the DMOD Overlay, which exists to
proactively protect the sensitive desert ecosystem from developmental pressures, not
react to their desires. It also sets an awful precedent, opening the doors for future
developers to make similar requests, rendering the DMOD Overlay effectively
meaningless.
II. ISSUES REGARDING PROCESS
Simultaneous Consideration of All Cases Is Not Permitted
These four applications were simultaneously presented on, discussed, and
approved for recommendation through a vote by the North Gateway Village Planning
Committee on March 10, 2022. 33 The Desert View Village Planning Committee is
scheduled to meet and take action on these “companion cases” on April 5, 2022. 34 This
is not permitted under City of Phoenix processes and the law.
The City of Phoenix’s General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide 35 notes
that simultaneous review of rezoning applications and requests to amend the General
Plan is prohibited. It specifically states:
May my rezoning application be reviewed simultaneously with my
application to amend the GENERAL PLAN?
No. Current City policy requires that action on a rezoning application is
separate from the procedure to amend the General Plan as State law
requires that all rezoning be consistent with and conform to the adopted
See FN 2.
See FN 3.
See City of Phoenix General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide (rev. 08/12/2021)
Page 1192
General Plan. A hearing on the rezoning application is to occur subsequent
to a determination on the change to the General Plan. However, you may
file your rezoning application and be scheduled for a hearing agenda
following action on the General Plan amendment. Note: This requirement
can be waived by the Planning and Development Director upon written
request for special circumstances.
General Plan Amendment Planning Process Guide, at p.2
A.R.S. § 9-462.01(F) states in relevant part that “[a]ll zoning and rezoning
ordinances adopted under this article shall be consistent with and conform to the adopted
general plan of the municipality”. It is the intent of the Legislature that revisions to the
General Plan must occur prior to, not simultaneous with, zoning and rezonings. This is an
important process as it protects the integrity of the General Plan and the processes
involved in its revision, including (but not at all limited to), ongoing public notice and
participation.
Exceptions to this requirement have not occurred and do not apply here.
Scheduling of a hearing agenda following action on the General Plan is not occurring
here, as the Verdin Minor General Plan Amendment Submittal (Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2) admits that “[t]his Amendment is being processed concurrently with applications to
change the zoning on the Property…” 36 Finally, there has been no indication that
developer Taylor Morrison has ever requested a written waiver of this explicit
requirement.
In addition, the General Plan Amendment Planning Process makes clear that the
contents of a General Plan Amendment hearing and a Rezoning hearing are quite
different. 37 For instance, certain zoning issues are “not appropriate for discussion” at a
General Plan Amendment hearing, including setbacks, elevation, open space, amenities,
and other topics. Simultaneous consideration of all of these applications, and
consideration of all of these topics at one single hearing, is inappropriate and contrary to
Phoenix City policies and Arizona laws governing municipal planning.
All Procedures for the Cases Must Be Complied With
On December 7, 2021 and December 9, 2021, the four applications were
presented and discussed at the Desert View Village Planning Committee and the North
Gateway Village Planning Committee regular monthly meetings, respectively. 38 On
See Verdin Major General Plan Amendment Submittal (December 17, 2021), p.5 (obtained via
public records request).
See FN 34 at 2-3.
See Desert View Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 7, 2021); see
North Gateway Village Planning Committee – Notice of Results (December 9, 2021).
Page 1193
December 17, 2021 and after these informational meetings, the General Plan
Amendment Application was resubmitted to the Planning & Development Department (the
first submittal having occurred over three years prior). 39 However, no further presentation
and discussion of this resubmittal occurred prior to voting meetings.
Neighborhood notification and meetings are also a requirement of the General
Plan Amendment process. Specifically, applicants are required to meet with property
owners within 600 feet of the subject site to present the proposal, and attempt to address
resident concerns. Furthermore, the General Plan Amendment Process Guide 40 requires:
“The results of that meeting shall be summarized and forwarded to the
village planner in whose village the case is located. No hearings shall be
scheduled without submittal of the following information:
• Date, time, and location of the meeting
• Number of participants
• Issues that arose during the meeting
• Plan to resolve the issues, if possible”
It is unclear whether this requirement has been met. Furthermore, if such a
meeting has occurred, it is important to determine whether the meeting occurred prior or
subsequent to the major resubmittal in December 2021. This is critical. Fundamental to
the planning process are ample, advance public notice allowing time for meaningful
review, engagement and participation.
For reasons stated above, the bundling of these four cases (rezoning applications,
request to amend the General Plan, and Planned Unit Development) is improper and
prohibited by the City of Phoenix’s own policy. Progression of these cases must stop on
this basis alone.
Public Review Opportunities Have Been Insufficient
The City of Phoenix Staff Report for Verdin PUD was not finalized until March 9,
2022, and was not posted on the Planned Unit Development Case List until just before
the North Gateway Village Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 41
Similarly, the City of Phoenix Staff Analysis for the General Plan Amendment was not
finalized until March 9, 2022. 42 Bafflingly, it is posted on the General Plan Amendment
See FN 35.
See FN 34.
See Staff Report Z-62-18-2 – Verdin PUD dated March 9, 2022.
See Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
Page 1194
Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022”, making it highly unlikely that an
interested citizen would easily be able to locate and review it (if they even knew it was
there). The City of Phoenix Staff Report for the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment was
also not finalized until March 9, 2022. 43 Also bafflingly, it is posted on the Rezoning &
Text Amendment Case List under the year “2018” and not under “2022.” This stymies the
good-faith efforts of even the most persistent interested citizen, and certainly stifles public
participation.
Additionally, revisions to the Verdin PUD Narrative have repeatedly been
resubmitted by developer Taylor Morrison over the past three months. The most recent
resubmission was on March 3, 2022, a few short days before the North Gateway Village
Planning Committee voting meeting on March 10, 2022. 44 No notification of this updated
draft (or the specific changes it contains) was received in advance of the March 10th
meeting.
No notification or alert was ever received that these reports or updates were even
available, leaving no time for any meaningful public review (or even awareness of their
existence) prior to the first Village voting meeting. This is made more egregious by the
fact that there are significant public concerns with this development, which have been
repeatedly raised throughout the years. In fact, public concern about this project has been
expressed since the project was first proposed as “MacEwen 480” in 2018. 45 As the City
is likely aware, the organization known as Save Our Sonoran Preserve was formed by
residents in response to these very threats from this project and SOS has fiercely
advocated for protection of the Preserve and DMOD Overlay ever since.
Although the Public Meeting materials included allotted time for “Public
Comments”, this opportunity is not meaningful, when the public is not given sufficient time
to review the relevant documents in advance of key voting meetings. Proper time for
public participation and notice are required components of the public process for all of
these cases. As you know, A.R.S. § 9-461.06(C) directs municipalities to provide for
“effective, early and continuous public participation” with respect to General Plan
amendment processes.
See Staff Report – Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Z-TA-5-18-2 dated March 9, 2022.
See Verdin PUD Narrative.
See “1,420 homes may line 9,671 acres of preserved north Phoenix desert” (AZCentral,
January 12, 2022); see “Hikers upset home builder may redevelop part of North Phoenix desert”
(AZFamily, February 28, 2022); see “Preserve at odds with high density housing” (Sonoran News,
May 15, 2019); see “Outdoor enthusiasts blast plan for 1,400 homes near Phoenix Sonoran
Preserve” (AZCentral, May 14, 2019).
Page 1195
Disclosing key materials on the same day as scheduled decision-making meetings
does not allow for meaningful public review and participation, and unfortunately, whether
or not intended, diminishes its importance. We sincerely hope that this will no longer be
the case moving forward.
III. CONCLUSION
The robust protections developed and codified in the Desert Maintenance Overlay
District have stood unaltered for the past 21 years. Erosion of these protections, if allowed
once, may not stop. Simply put, the Desert Maintenance Overlay District must be
preserved intact and not modified.
What we are asking for here is not radical. PMPC does not oppose a reasonable
development on the McEwen Ranch LLC property consistent with current development
standards and zoning requirements. Phoenix has already spoken with the approval of the
DMOD Overlay, which reflects the years of hard work put into development of the DMOD
Overlay by so many dedicated citizens and professionals.
Anything short of preserving the DMOD Overlay as-is will seriously degrade fragile
desert ecosystems in the area, sever connections between the Preserves, and set a
dangerous precedence where developers can easily bypass important protections for our
unique landscapes across Phoenix.
Yours Truly,
Patrick McMullen
Dr. Patrick McMullen, PhD, President
Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Email: pmpcaz@gmail.com
CC: Director, Phoenix City Planning & Development
Phoenix City Planning & Development Department (zoning@phoenix.gov)
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Executive Board, Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council, Inc.
Page 1196
REFERENCE: Z-62-18-2 Verdin PUD
TO: Phoenix Planning and Zoning Commission
I am a 30+ year resident of Phoenix and actively involved in the preservation and wise management
of our Mountain Preserves. I wish to compliment the work of the Planning and Zoning Department
staff in facilitating a robust public process that spanned the years of Covid-19 restrictions.
I want to publically acknowledge and thank the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council and the
Save Our Sonoran Desert coalition for their steadfast attention to this zoning case. Particularly the
purpose of the Desert Character Overlay Zone in protecting the Cave Creek Wash, an important
native desert asset for wildlife and Sonoran desert plants. Without their persistent voices the
opportunity to meet with the developers and have a productive conversation may never have
happened.
I submitted earlier comments prior to the Village Planning Committee meetings as follows:
STIP #1: Public trail access easements, as approved by the City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation
Department, shall be provided for the Mesquite Wash Corridor Trail, and the Community Paseo
Paths that provide a connection to future trail connections to the Sonoran Preserve as identified on
the Verdin Pedestrian Circulation plan dated June 3, 2019 included within the Verdin PUD, to ensure
permanent public access through the Verdin community to the Sonoran Preserve. The public access
shall be designed in a way to restrict unauthorized motor vehicle access, as approved by Parks. The
specific location, design and timing of construction of the public trail connections shall be
coordinated with and approved by the Parks and Recreation Department.
STIP #2: A minimum 25 foot open space tract shall be provided along the eastern boundary of the
Verdin property to provide a transition to the Cave Creek Wash corridor. The open space tract shall
be considered a Certified Area Type “B” – Natural Revegetated Area with plant material from the
Approved Plant List: Green List.
I am pleased to see these recommendations added to the stipulations of this PUD. I do want to
stress the importance of making sure public access designations are part of zoning approvals. Verbal
commitments are often lost over time as land ownership and management changes through the
decades. I also hope that Phoenix Planning and Zoning will view this PUD as the example for the
inevitable development of surrounding State Trust Lands that are not included in the Desert
Character Overlay and have adjacency to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation
Area.
Yours in Conservation,
Vashti “Tice” Supplee
918 W. Roosevelt Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Vsupplee25@gmail.com
602-380-3722
Page 1197
Racelle Escolar
From: Eric Idalski
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 2:15 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Sonoran Preserve concerns
Mr. Nico Howard,
I am writing to advise of my concern related to the proposed changes that would affect the Sonoran Preserve and surrounding
communities.
I am an avid user of the Sonoran Preserve as well as a volunteer park steward. I feel that the increased traffic volume that
would come on Sonoran Desert Drive is dangerous. Today I nearly witnessed a horrible accident as a young family was
crossing the road and vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed nearly hit them. I cant imagine double or triple the traffic as this
area already carries more traffic than is compatible with safe, enjoyable cycling and hiking. I also live just south of the road
and the additional road noise that will come with this is disturbing for current residents such as myself as well as the impact of
the noise in the preserve.
In addition, I am concerned with the overall impact on wildlife. We have already seen a loss of habitat for wildlife such as
owls and dessert tortoise that I see on occasion in between the north and south preserves. I will unfortunately be traveling for
business the week of the next hearing but hope that my concerns are heard.
Please help maintain the area and protect the preserve that so many have grown to love and enjoy and avoid detracting from
the tranquility treasured by trail users and visitors.
Kind Regards,
Eric Idalski
480-363-8735
Page11198
Racelle Escolar
From: Joyce A Lefler
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 3:05 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com; Joyce A lefler
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Please do NOT allow any more encroachment of houses or traffic or businesses in or near our Sonoran Preserve!
My husband and I are retired and years ago we sunk everything we have into our house near the preserve BECAUSE of the
quiet, peace, and hiking & biking trails of the preserve. This became our little piece of heaven while still being in the big city.
Please do not destroy this by allowing the preserve to be overbuilt. We enjoy the owls, bobcats, coyotes and javelinas who live
here. More traffic, more people and more houses will destroy their ability to live here, also.
Please do NOT allow our preserve to be slowly destroyed.
Joyce A Lefler
Joyce A Lefler, BSN, RTS, RNC‐OB (retired),
author of From Miracle to Murder: Justice for Adam
http://bit.ly/MiracletoMurder [bit.ly]
Page11199
Racelle Escolar
From: Sue Pierce
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 1:58 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Sue Pierce
Subject: Verdun Development Along Sonoran Desert Drive
Dear Planning Commissioners,
Please accept my comments in opposition to the Verdun request to remove the Desert Character Overlay
along Sonoran Desert Drive.
I am a citizen of Phoenix, AZ and a resident who lives in a community along Dove Valley Road (Desert Enclave).
The rapid growth in the 85085‐zip code (and others in Phoenix) is a mixed blessing. We appreciate the job
growth, hundreds of new apartments and housing units, new retail stores, restaurants, commercial/industrial
development, and growth in tax revenues for the City and State. All important.
However, the growth comes with problems, too, that to date, no one has addressed adequately. Here are
concerns we have voiced for the last two years and that I want you to be aware of:
Roads not built to handle the increased traffic with no specific timeline for mitigation. The extra
turning lanes Verdun is proposing, and a possible traffic signal are simply Band‐Aids ‐ not solutions.
This creates serious safety issues for those living in the area and using the Preserve.
Desert Enclave residents not able to exit their development onto Dove Valley Road during morning and
afternoon rush hour. This will become worse with dense housing along Sonoran Desert Drive.
Biking lanes created along Sonoran Desert Drive no longer safe to use as trucks, trailers and cars travel
at 60 ‐ 80 miles/hour along the road.
Trash and debris are thrown along the roadway, including discarded metal, containers, etc. as traffic
increases. And yes, several of us walk the road to pick up what we can. However, there is just too much
for us to handle.
Increased traffic creates noise pollution that makes hiking trails at Apache Wash Trailhead less of a
respite from the busyness of the city. I hike with my noise cancelling headset on to block some of
it. Hiking the trails such as Ridgeback rarely am I able to get away from the site of houses or away from
the noise of the already overly busy road.
There are so many more concerns: water access(our HOA was told to reduce water use by 20%),
wildlife refuge issues, flooding along the washes and the fact that the City of Phoenix invested millions
into the creation of a beautiful preserve and roadway with paved trails and beautiful bridges. And now
what will come of that investment.
Please keep the Desert Character Overlay in place. Allow wise growth in the area near Apache Wash Trailhead.
Protect the Preserve as a wonderful urban haven for everyone to use as their escape from the city to the
desert.
Thank you,
Sue
Sue Pierce
Page11200
Racelle Escolar
From: Sonoran Preserve
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 11:58 AM
To: Racelle Escolar; PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Save Our Sonoran Preserve Official Statement on Verdin Rezone
Attachments: Planning Commission Comments Attachment.pdf
Dear Chair Howard & Members of the Phoenix City Planning Commission,
The following comments are submitted on behalf of Save Our Sonoran Preserve [supportpubliclands.com] and the nearly
1,000 nearby residents who have signed our petition at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
[surveymonkey.com]. These comments pertain to Items #5 to #8, on the May 5th Planning Commission agenda:
https://www.phoenix.gov/cityclerksite/PublicMeetings/220505008.pdf.
If Agenda Items #5‐#8 are approved, then the intensity of development on 155 acres of the Desert Character Overly
District could be doubled or tripled.
The site adjoins Sonoran Desert Drive. Attached to this message are:
An aerial showing the location of the nearly 1,000 area residents who have signed our petition thus far,
A copy of the petition, and
The reasons provided for 95% of petition signers for why they are deeply troubled by the applicant’s request to
deviate from the requirements of the Desert Character Overly District.
As you will see from the reasons provided by our petition signers, (*which is included in 47 of the 49 pages of the
attachment to this message) those who bike, run or walk along Sonoran Desert Drive feel that the volume of high‐speed
traffic already makes the two roadside bike lanes uncomfortable and in some respects unsafe. Indeed, the bike lane
design guidance documents published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO), and others indicate that the current Sonoran Desert Drive bike lanes, which are
separated from travel lanes by a painted line, is insufficient when traffic volume exceeds 7,000 – 10,000 vehicles/day
and at speeds in excess of 35 mph.
According to the applicant’s (MacEwen 480) traffic study [app.box.com], Sonoran Desert Drive was carrying 8,300
vehicles/day as of 2019. The MacEwen 480 report indicated the project would add another 13,000 vehicles per day to
Sonoran Desert Drive. In other words, this one project would increase Sonoran Desert Drive traffic volume to more than
21,000 vehicles/day, which is far in excess of the upper limit for a bike lane separated from traffic by just a painted line.
Page11201
The 45 mph speed limit along Sonoran Desert Drive makes the adjoining bike lanes far more dangerous than a more
appropriate facility. Most bike facility guidance documents call for bike lanes physically separated from travel lanes
when speeds exceed 35 mph. And the 85th percentile speed on Sonoran Desert Drive is likely 55 mph.
Of equal concern is the impact of increased Sonoran Desert Drive traffic noise on the Sonoran Desert Preserve sound
scape. While traffic noise can presently be heard along many of the trails ramifying the Preserve, the increased traffic
volume on Sonoran Desert Drive will increase the level of noise and the distance it intrudes into the Preserve. Acoustic
models indicate that each doubling of traffic volume also doubles traffic noise. By causing traffic volume to go from the
current 8,300 vehicles/day to more than 20,000 vehicles per day, the changes embodied in Agenda Items #5 ‐ #8, will
more than double the impact of traffic noise on the tranquility of Preserve trails.
It is for these reasons that we ask the Planning Commission to keep the Desert Character Overlay District as is and
recommend denial for Agenda Items #5 ‐ #8.
Following is a sampling of the reasons provided by those who signed the Save Our Sonoran Preserve petition:
I use the Sonoran preserve almost daily to get a brief reprieve from the overcrowding of Phoenix. The ability
to briefly enjoy the desert views without seeing endless developments and choking smog of cars is why we
decided to live in this area.
Currently traffic on Dove Valley / Sonoran Desert Drive is heavy during busy hours. With the addition of
Verdin adding 1200 homes could increase traffic by 3 times and with 2 new housing developments currently
being built west of us and the new semiconductor plant being built could increase traffic by 6 times as
where it is today. Plus taking over more of the desert landscape that was originally approved is just being
greedy. I am all for progress and increasing tax base but there must be limits to preserve the beauty of our
area.
The beauty of the desert is disappearing fast! We drive Sonoran desert drive 2‐3 times a week west bound
around sunset. So many people simply stop to take pictures because of the beauty. There is a brief
opportunity to do this because soon houses come into view and obstruct the natural vistas. Homes being
built today are huge two story monstrosities, cramming these large homes together will destroy this
beautiful landscape.
As a native Arizonan I am saddened to see so much of the natural beauty of our desert being scourged.
Driving anywhere in the valley and nearby areas you are assaulted by the lack of natural beauty. We need
to halt urban scrawl and save the desert for our grandchildren.
The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is one of the finest uses of tax payer dollars. The ability to hike and mountain
bike on miles and miles of trails is one of my favorite parts of living in North Phoenix. We are already
inundated with apartment complexes and home developments with plenty of inventory. Plus, there is
plenty of land available for developers to build on that won’t wreck one of the best things that the City of
Phoenix has done in the past couple decades.
Page21202
The Sonoran Preserve and the Sonoran Desert Drive represent the last of pristine desert in the City of
Phoenix. Anyone who has visited the Preserve and the Drive will see beautiful views, wildlife, and people
using the bike lanes and hiking trails. To allow a massive development to destroy the character overlay will
ruin the peaceful drive and endanger the ecosystem. I also fear that the additional traffic will no doubt
create dangerous conditions for cyclists that regularly train on Sonoran Desert Drive. We live here to
appreciate the desert. But the desert is disappearing in Phoenix. The Sonoran Preserve is a wonderful area
of Phoenix and a great place to escape to from the hustle and bustle of other areas. To grant the rezoning
request of a home builder will send the message that the City of Phoenix cares more about development
and not about the constituents who appreciate the desert and all that it offers.
Adding additional homes when there is no road infrastructure will add so much traffic. I drive SDD and
there are times when there are more than 25 cars backed up at the intersection of Cave Creek Rd. Also I am
concerned about closing up the wash between SDD because animals need to be able to traverse the entire
wash. I am not against the original number of homes but to increase it to what TM is asking is a lot more
homes. The Sonoran Preserve is very beautiful and I enjoy biking there but it is hard to cross the street with
the current amount of traffic on Dove Valley Rd and the Verdin Project will triple the amount of traffic.
I walk and bike at the preserve at least a couple of times a week. It’s beautiful, and quiet. Driving through to
Cave Creek Road is actually relaxing, I drive that way when I want to stay away from the crowds on the
freeways (17 & 101). It’s a beautiful drive, it’s what living in Az is about, wide open and beautiful to look at.
Don’t ruin it with more houses and traffic congestion.
We need to do everything we can to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve. There shouldn’t be lots of homes
there. We’ve already taken so much of the natural habitat and developed it. We need to leave large chunks
alone so that those animals that live in the desert have a place. I love having the wilderness nearby and
untouched. Increasing the number of homes near the preserve is asking for trouble and displacing so many
of the desert animals. I bought out here to be close to nature not to bring the downtown traffic here.
Our schools are already over capacity and adding yet another high density housing development will
adversely impact the school infrastructure as well as the safety to bikers in Sonoran Boulevard/Dove
Valley. Allowing larger lots and this home sizes will attract more affluent residents and this increase the tax
revenues for this region.
I oppose the Verdin site changing the current Desert Character Overlay District plan. We are already seeing
traffic that is dangerous to our cyclists and pedestrians. Adding additional homes without concern for the
traffic it will bring will greatly make this road even more dangerous.
The Desert Character Overlay District was put in place to allow for growth but with measures and
safeguards needed. Ignoring and allowing growth beyond that allowed by the Desert Overlay District in the
Sonoran Preserve area is wrong and will lessen the uniqueness and beauty that we currently have, while
also adding traffic and reducing safety for those that currently enjoy cycling, walking, hiking, etc. along
Sonoran and the preserves. Please do not allow Verdin development to move forward with their plans to
exponentially grow this area and add more homes To the Sonoran Preserve. Thank you.
Lastly, maintaining the Desert Character Overlay does not halt this project, it will only allow for smart development
near one of Phoenix’s beloved Preserves (a sensitive site) as well as give a sense of resilience to our zoning laws that
our elected officials approved. If there is one zoning law to uphold and one location to protect, it’s definitely this
one.
Respectfully,
Page31203
Gary Kirkilas, Chair
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
(708) 369‐4566
saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
[google.com]
*See Attachment
Page41204
Save Our Sonoran
Petition Signer
Locations
Page 1205
➤
N
10 mi
Page 1206
Reasons Provided By Phoenix Residents for Why They Signed
the Save Our Sonoran Preserve Petition at:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
I use the Sonoran preserve almost daily to get a brief reprieve from the overcrowding of Phoenix. The ability to
briefly enjoy the desert views without seeing endless developments and choking smog of cars is why we decided
to live in this area.
Currently traffic on Dove Valley / Sonoran Desert Drive is heavy during busy hours. With the addition of Verdin
adding 1200 homes could increase traffic by 3 times and with 2 new housing developments currently being built
west of us and the new semiconductor plant being built could increase traffic by 6 times as where it is today.
Plus taking over more of the desert landscape that was originally approved is just being greedy. I am all for
progress and increasing tax base but there must be limits to preserve the beauty of our area.
The beauty of the desert is disappearing fast! We drive Sonoran desert drive 2‐3 times a week west bound
around sunset. So many people simple stop to take pictures because of the beauty. There is a brief opportunity
to do this because soon houses come into view and obstruct the natural vistas. Home being built today are huge
two story monstrosities, craning this large home together will destroy this beautiful landscape.
As a native Arizonan I am saddened to see so much of the natural beauty of our desert being scourged. Driving
anywhere in the valley and nearby areas you are assaulted by the lack of natural beauty. We need to halt urban
scrawl and save the desert for our grandchildren.
The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is one of the finest uses of tax payer dollars. The ability to hike and mountain
bike on miles and miles of trails is one of my favorite parts of living in North Phoenix. We are already inundated
with apartment complexes and home developments with plenty of inventory. Plus, there is plenty of land
available for developers to build on that won’t wreck one of the best things that the City of Phoenix has done in
the past couple decades.
The Sonoran Preserve and the Sonoran Desert Drive represent the last of pristine desert in the city of Phoenix.
Anyone who has visited the Preserve and the Drive will see beautiful views, wildlife, and people using the bike
lanes and hiking trails. To allow a massive development destroy the character overlay will ruin the peaceful
drive and endanger the ecosystem. I also fear that the additional traffic will no doubt create dangerous
conditions for cyclists that regularly train on Sonoran Desert Drive. We live here to appreciate the desert. But
the desert is disappearing in Phoenix. The Sonoran Preserve is a wonderful area of Phoenix and a great place to
escape to from the hustle and bustle of other areas. To grant the rezoning request of a home builder will send
the message that the City of Phoenix cares more about development and not about the constituents who
Adding additional homes when there is no road infrastructure will add so much traffic. I drive SDD and there are
times when there are more than 25 cars backed up at the intersection of Cave Creek Rd. Also I am concerned
about closing up the wash between SDD because animals need to be able to traverse the entire wash. I am not
against the original number of homes but to increase it to what TM is asking is a lot more homes. The Sonoran
Preserve is very beautiful and I enjoy biking there but it is hard to cross the street with the current amount of
traffic on Dove Valley Rd and the Verdin Project will triple the amount of traffic.
I walk and bike at the preserve at least a couple of times a week. It’s beautiful, and quiet. Driving through to
cave creek rd is actually relaxing, I drive that way when I want to stay away from the crowds on the freeways
(17 & 101). It’s a beautiful drive, it’s what living in Az is about, wide open and beautiful to look at. Don’t ruin it
with more houses and traffic congestion.
Page 1207
We need to do everything we can to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve. There shouldn’t be lots of homes
there. We’ve already taken so much of the natural habitat and developed it. We need to leave large chunks
alone so that those animals that live in the desert have a place. I love having the wilderness nearby and
untouched. Increasing the number of homes near the preserve is asking for trouble and displacing so many of
the desert animals. I bought out here to be close to nature not to bring the downtown traffic here.
Our schools are already over capacity and adding yet another high density housing development will adversely
impact the school infrastructure as well as the safety to bikers in Sonoran Boulevard/Dove Valley. Allowing
larger lots and this home sizes will attract more affluent residents and this increase the tax revenues for this
I oppose the Verdin site changing the current Desert Character Overlay District plan. We are already seeing
traffic that is dangerous to our cyclists and pedestrians. Adding additional homes without concern for the traffic
it will bring will greatly make this road even more dangerous.
The Desert Character Overlay District was put in place to allow for growth but with measures and safeguards
needed. Ignoring and allowing growth beyond that allowed by the Desert Overlay District in the Sonoran
Preserve area is wrong and will lesson the uniqueness and beauty that we currently have, while also adding
traffic and reducing safety for those that currently enjoy cycling, walking, hiking, etc. along Sonoran and the
preserves. Please do not allow Verdin development to move forward with their plans to exponentially grow this
area and add more homes To the Sonoran Preserve. Thank you.
The unique space is one of the main reasons we built our home in the Gateway region. It has only been open
for a few years and needs to remain a "Preserve" and not stress or encroach on the desert any more than
already has happened.
as a third generation native zoney, I have seen too much of our beautiful desert turned over to developers. We
must preserve the very asset that draws so many to move to our wonderful state‐ find a better balance
between growth and preservation. I recently moved to a home in Sonoran Foothills to enjoy this beautiful area.
Please do not allow the greed of developers overbuild our desert.
Too much traffic and too many users making heavy environmental impact. The preserve is there for a reason.
any change to Desert Character Overlay will open the door to the entire area being filled in with high density
housing. Forever destroying the natural landscape of the area. Please vote NO.
There is already so much danger to bicyclists. Also, just as important, keeping the desert beautiful and allowing
wildlife to thrive in the Sonoran Preserve.
I've hiked the Apache Trail and adjacent areas through the years while visiting my family in Phoenix. I recently
bought a house in the area and I'm saddened and alarmed that the Phoenix City Council would entertain the
doubling or tripling the number of housing units on the Verdin site. There is a reason why the Desert Character
Overlay District is in existence. I strongly urge the Council to reject the Verdin development company's proposal
to double or triple the number of housing units for the Verdin site.
With the amount of traffic on Sonoran/Dove Valley today, when we pull out of Sonoran Gate Community, it is
taking a chance on your life when needing to turn left. Why would anyone approve more home building to get
more traffic? Also cars ‐ and trucks ‐ are speeding between 55‐70 miles an hour on this stretch. You should
have traffic lights at all intersections for turning traffic. Also, Let's Save Our Desert Views ‐ that's why we built a
Traffic is already overloaded on dove valley road and commitments were made to develop the Sonoran desert
drive. Nothing has happen. Trying to exit my desert enclave neighbor is struggle now, adding more traffic is
negligent. I also moved to the area for the serenity of the preserves and natural habits, all developers in the
area must comply with the desert character overlay.
Page 1208
My wife Barbara and I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for nearly nine years. The appeal of this location was and
still is the Sonoran Preserve, a true gift to the residents of Phoenix. Many years ago the overlay district
created a plan for growth balanced with the fragile ecosystem of the preserve. Neglecting this balance
jeopardizes the character which makes this place so special as well as places the preserve at risk. I respectfully
request the Phoenix City Council comply with the overlay and hold Verdin to the established guidelines. After all,
one of the reasons this area appeals to them is they recognize the beauty and appeal of this location to future
There’s very few places in Arizona where it’s not jam packed with houses and people. As an outdoorsman it’s a
very special place as every weekend I go there to ride a bike, hike, among other things. With the recent houses
built, it went from a Mecca for outdoor enthusiasts to just a nice place. I used to be able to ride and run without
seeing anyone for miles. Now Everytime I almost get hit by a car traveling to fast and then riding in the bike
lane. Phoenix in general is one of the worst cities for bike fatalities and this literally is the one spot that we can
count on for not getting hit. If this goes up than we really will have no place to call home. Please reconsider
This area is greatly used for hiking, biking, trail running, and outdoor recreational activities. We do not want
over development to ruin the natural aesthetics, significantly increase noise, or pollution that would degrade
the value of the true remaining wilderness in the Sonoran Desert Preserve. Please seek to enforce and uphold
the Desert Character Overlay District toward the Verdin project and other subsequent proposals.
Traffic is my main issue. As a Sonoran bike route it is becoming more and more dangerous for bikers. School
traffic on main roads and through neighborhoods also has become more dangerous. Wilderness can never be
recaptured once homes are built so we have a once in a lifetime duty to save land for conservation and wildlife.
Thanks for listening
We need to preserve the landscape before there is nothing left of the valley except city streets. The entire eco
system changes affecting animal habitats, raising temperatures, and Killing plant life. Phoenix is slowly killing
an entire section of it's appeal by building further north into natural landscape.
I hike thru the preserve almost everyday. It is a beautiful and peaceful area amid the city. Losing this area to
Korea housing would be awful. There is so much development everywhere so these special areas are becoming
all the more important to spare or not over develop. Once it is gone it can not be replaced. Please don't let this
wonderful area be ruined by more over development!
Maintain desert preserve, congestion, quality of life, safer place to enjoy desert with exercise.
Love the beauty that this area brings to all.
We need to start limiting the amount of residential builds in the Sonoran Preserve area before this majestic
natural place is no more. Preserve the habitat and recreational area this land offers local residents and tourists.
The area is already congested and poses safety concerns for bicyclists, hikers and drivers due to the increased
motor traffic activity. Adding more congestion would further escalate the risk and concern associated.
Additional development will ruin the Sonoran Reserve’s pristine nature. Please preserve this vital area for our
Desert’s wildlife for generations to come to enjoy .
The development that is already out there detracts from the natural environment immensely. Additional
development will only make this worse. Build elsewhere...just not here please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Sonoran Preserve was the deciding factor for my wife and I to move to this area. We had hoped that
Preserve would stay as it is a Natural desert landscape that was protected for all to enjoy. We enjoy the
numerous hiking trails, walking areas that are safe and the pavilions that we use to gather with friends . We
knew that there would be issues when we seen new developments popping up and took away the Natural
surroundings. This has to stop . Did I mention the wildlife that we all see and enjoy? These developments are all
about one thing ‐ greed. Please let this continue to be the Sonoran Preserve!
Page 1209
I am a local resident that loves riding and hiking the Sonoran Preserve. We already have so much traffic in the
road ways around the preserve. I am tired of having to live in a beautiful desert that just keeps slowly
disappearing because of development. Animals are being pushed out and more traffic noise and people does
not help. The schools are already maxed out. How many more homes will come after this development is
approved? Please keep the desert the desert.
Wildlife protection and natural beauty
It’s our beautiful land! Save the land from unnecessary buildings.
Want to keep area lower traffic
Safeguarding the Sonoran Desert Preserve values we treasure
It is not needed for the tax base, it will overwhelm the infrastructure in place, it will eventually lead to the
destruction of the desert through the continued use of ATVs and other off road recreational vehicles as well as
lead to increased congestion and, yes, increased crime.
It’s vital to keep the preserve natural and untouched for the use of hiking and supporting outdoor activities.
Without the regulations in place there would be no preserve to use and admire. The animals in the preserve
would be greatly affected by a larger population crowding them.
It is important to preserve the natural desert landscape and prevent overbuild that will destroy habitats.
Ignoring the desert character overlay district would be a HUGE mistake. Overdevelopment will ruin the desert
and will change the habitat in and around that area and big developers don’t care about that so it’s our job to
care for them.
We need more open space and already have enough homes!
No more building and take away from our desert landscape. Stop already.
Concerned for the environment, the pollution in our area is to much. The desert is also disappearing because of
over population
Sonoran desert is such a beautiful drive. Everyone should be able to experience it. Sonoran desert drive is not
meant for a high volumes of traffic and our beautiful Sonoran desert would be ruined with the addition of
housing developments along Sonoran Desert Drive.
I’m concerned about all the animals in the area. As well as if you continue to build what about the schools and
the traffic. It no longer will be a peaceful environment. And the more expensive homes you build people really
can’t afford them but end up in bankruptcy and then they’ll be empty
We need open space for our and our children's mental health to provide a place of refuge and exercise areas
that remove us from the daily drone of cars, machines and our phones.
The volume of traffic is already out of control on Sonoran Desert Drive. Please keep the Sonoran Preserve as it
Protect wildlife that has already been driven out of surrounding areas. Keep the intention of a preserve.
As the builders destroy the land for more houses the animal life get pushed away and in to smaller areas of
open land. Or get caught in or on people's property. Unacceptable to just ignore the standards for there
That is a protected place that we need to take care as part of our lungs we need good air, we have so many
houses, why we need to destroy the habitat of a lot of animals.
Overdeveloping is irresponsible when there’s no plan for increased traffic and water supply!
Preserve recreation area that is part of and enjoyed by our community. Prevent gross over development which
will destroy the desert community which we call home
This land is important to keep more open than crowded!
Keep our desert traffic and congestion to a minimum; we still enjoy a lot of wildlife.
Keeping the beauty of the desert in tact, especially with the hiking/biking that is done there. Also very
concerned about traffic and congestion.
Taking away the sceneries wildlife and open park trails to enjoy. Once you start building gets crowded needing
more wider roads taking away from the above
Page 1210
It is vitally important that the Sonoran desert preserve is kept safe from over population of the surrounding
areas! The overbuilding of the area will degrade the beautiful that we and future generations need in our lives
to create the balance of city living. It’s critical! Over building followed by extremely high traffic increases will
destroy the preservation of it’s natural beauty. I ask that the members of the Phoenix City Counsel hear our
concerns and uphold the Desert Character Overlay District as it was intended.
Destroying the desert, views and too much traffic on Dove Valley/Sonoran PkwyN which also funnels to Jomax
where many school‐aged child ride bikes and walk.
I have lived in this area for 11 years and have been walking those trails for just as long. It is an amazing preserve
that I treasure walking every single day. The scenery is beautiful and the wildlife thrives in the area. Losing any
portion of this place would be a disgrace to this gorgeous piece of land that should be protected for the people
of our area. Please reconsider this, i am beyond disappointed to hear that this is even a thought. Please save our
Beautiful desert scenery and nearby desert recreation like hiking and biking.
I am concerned because my backyard will face the six lane road. As it is the two lane road(dove valley and
Sonoran dessert drive) is driven like a freeway and most people do not go the speed limit. I could just imagine
what the six lane would be like behind us. When we purchased this home we were not made aware of the plans
the city had for this area. Very disappointed. Also Verdin having 1400 hundred homes would really make the
traffic crazier than it already is right now.. like I said very disappointing!!
Traffic will increase dramatically! Hiking and cycling will no longer be enjoyable and r safe.
The growth of the area needs to slow down. The area cannot handle the traffic nor can the police keep up with
enforcing traffic safety. There are too many irresponsible drivers who think Senora Desert Dr is a nascar
track. Adding more drivers will be an irresponsible choice of local government and making our roads less safe
for recreational use. A white line for a bike lane does nothing when cars/trucks are going 60 mph.
Way too much traffic
Desire to maintain the nature preserve and to limit traffic and related safety hazards.
The desert is being over built and animals have few places left to inhabit. The views of mountains and the
skyline are increasingly blocked by taller and taller buildings and dwellings
I moved to this area to enjoy the desert and the wildlife associated with the environment. Developers have one
objective ‐ money. We must preserve what is left of this beautiful landscape
Beautiful drive and prime hiking area
Northern Phoenix is already getting overrun by new developments. Would be nice to keep some lands in their
natural state so we can enjoy the beauty it brings
It’s a beautiful corridor and vital habitat for desert wildlife, along with a natural desert wash.
I live right next to it and want to see it preserved.
I love this natural area. It is very important that the building be kept down as we are losing our natural areas to
concrete and overdevelopment. AZ does not have enough water for all of these homes/buildings. Traffic is
horrendous already. Please don’t do this.
Original 2006 owner who has seen this area grow and change. I’m very concerned about the population over
expansion in this area. I live right off Dove Valley which has already become unsafe due to traffic volume and
lack of proper traffic signals (some of which are on the way). However, I don’t believe Dove Valley was ever
intended to hold the kind of volume it will experience if growth is not governed. I for one wholeheartedly
support the enforcement of the Desert Character Overlay District. Thank you
I grew up in cave creek which is right on the other side and I know the value to this desert landscape and the
peace it brings to others. It’s natures playground let it be
Preserving the natural beauty of the area is important to current residents. They use this area for healthy
recreation. It also should be saved fir environmental reasons. Don’t add to the sprawl that is already part of
may areas in Phoenix .
I live in the neighborhood and don’t want them to change our desert look it’s very important
Page 1211
The Desert Character Overlay District should be adhered to.
My family and I enjoy biking and hiking in that area, which is part of the reason we live where we do. We believe
the City of Phoenix made a informed and important decision to maintain the wilderness, beauty and safety of
that area for a reason and would hate to see that decision overturned.
This is a beautiful scenic preserve that has already experienced housing growth, wild fires caused by humans,
and an increase in traffic. We have lived in this area for 15 years and specifically love that it used to be quiet and
just outside of the city. No thank you to further developments! Preserve the land, wildlife, and natural growth!
This is a great recreation area for biking and hiking and too high of density development will be detrimental to
these uses.
Our wildlife is being displaced and soon will not have a place to live. People want them killed as they are afraid
of them! We will live in a denser area and it will soon feel like NY City! We must find a balance for all.
The main reason we bought our home in this location was because of how beautiful the desert is and very
peaceful. Almost feels like we're out of town in our very own neighborhood. Also, there is already an
infrastructure challenge with the lack of grocery stores, restaurants, gas stations etc. Adding 1200 more homes
would have a major impact on everything around us and create serious traffic issues to go anywhere, even on
I and my family moved to this area to enjoy the preserve. While we understand there is growth in the area, it
was done under the rules and regulations set forth. I would ask that all builders comply.
Too many housing developments going up, water, waste and increased traffic issues.
Leaving the preserve alone will allow animals to preserve their homes. This drive is one of the most beautiful
drives in the valley and really displays all of what is natural Arizona. Also, traffic is bad enough as it is. Adding
thousands of houses would further crowd what is currently a quiet, serene pet of the valley. Let’s keep a small
piece of desert instead.
I have lived in the norterra area since 2006. I have seen the development boom since I arrived. This last little bit
of land seems to be the only thing left in the area. It's necessary to preserve for wildlife and for us. We are
nurtured by nature. The drive is beautiful and we utilize hiking and biking trails often.
I absolutely love the beauty of the desert and the opportunity we have to get out in the preserve to hike, run
and bike. I am an avid trail runner and hiker and would be devastated if we lose that ability just to make way for
more houses.
The speed at which the traffic flows is about 20 over the speed limit and it is a matter of time before a biker is
killed. This is happening currently and with more traffic /homes it will be worse. We don’t have the school
space to support more homes. We moved up north to get away from traffic and now the desert is at risk of
being destroyed by more builds.
After retirement, I moved here from the city specifically to enjoy the Sonora Preserve. To lose the beauty of
The Preserve would be nothing short Of a crime.
I love to hike, bike, and walk the foothills. Open space is why we bought up here.
I live off of Sonoran Desert Drive now. There is no infrastructure in place at this time to support additional
development. There has already been an influx of both commercial and residential in this area within the last
year. Until the city, county and state does much more work to improve our roads, water, and law enforcement
existing issues; there should be no further development at this time.
I am very concerned with the amount of traffic and safety in my community with the amount of people that
could potentially be here. We are a quiet and safe neighborhood and I'd like to keep it this way.
Traffic is already too heavy and congested. Our streets are becoming dangerous.
It is important that we preserve our land to make it available to enjoy the outside life without the traffic.
This area is beautiful and it would be a shame for it to be overdeveloped.
It’s a preserve for a reason. That’s why we chose to live here. Thank you.
The number of people hiking is increasing but even if is not, the streets are narrow and it is dangerous to drive.
Page 1212
The Sonoran Preserve is a magnificent specimen of the desert. The desert plants and wildlife within this area are
a dream come true for hikers and bicyclists. With the increase of people moving into the area, traffic has grown
exponentially. If we build more homes in this area, we need to put measures in place to protect this valuable
asset to our state, as well as provide safety for the people who visit it throughout the year.
I'm mountain bike in the Sonoran preserve 3 to 4 times per week and feel it is vitally important to keep some
space set aside with minimal traffic and housing.
I have many reasons for you to consider preserving the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive. Homes and
traffic directly impact the fragile desert. Urban heat, pollution, and human destruction directly destroy the
desert plants. The Sonoran Preserve was set aside for the specific reason of preserving an area for people to
enjoy the beauty of the desert. Adding homes along the Sonoran Preserve and Sonoran Desert Drive will
increase traffic. Solutions to traffic congestion is to add and or expand lanes which will take up desert land.
Lastly and more importantly, Arizona is in a major drought. More homes means less water. There are plenty of
homes and apartments being built in Phoenix without taking from the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert
The preserve is a sanctuary and feel that this increased volume of homes would create a dangerous high traffic
in an area that is a recreational haven for cyclist, hikers and runners. The impact of these homes will also have a
negative affect on the the wildlife and natural dessert of the area.
We chose to move to Sonoran Foothills to be close to the desert landscape and away from the dense population
of the city. We understood that the city had protected the areas surrounding the preserve by requiring certain
standards and limiting the number of homes that can be built. The requirements that were in place while the
Sonoran foothills community was being built, maintain the overall integrity of the surrounding desert. There is a
mix of apartment homes, patio homes and homes with lots. All were required to follow strict landscaping
guidelines to match the desert. Why aren’t these standards being upheld for any future development? It is
evident that greed is now winning. The home builders goal is to build as many houses as will be allowed as this is
most profitable for them. They are NOT concerned with the impact this will have on traffic, current residents or
the desert. Also, it appears the city is trying to solve the housing shortage by putting in a disproportionate
number of high density dwellings from I‐17 to Cave Creek.
Me and my family and friends are all avid trail runners with great respect for our wildlife and natural
ecosystems. I don’t dispute the need for housing but the Desert Character Overlay District put the standards in
place for exactly this reason ‐ to prevent developers from overdevelopment that would ruin the NATURAL
ecosystem. I applaud them for some of the measures they propose in planning but that will never make up for
any zoning change and quite frankly is hypocritical. Please make sure Verdin complies with the current standard
I frequent the Sonoran Preserve 2‐3 times a week and my husband road bikes 4‐5 times a week in the bike
lanes. We enjoy being able to go enjoy the desert without having to see home after home. We are also in a
drought and putting more homes up does not help address the issue. Please think about keeping more open
spaces for everyone to enjoy who already lives here it is getting crowded enough.
My family and I are avid cyclists, and for the past five years we have seen an increase of cars and speed. I myself
had a couple of car and motorcycle incidents due to the amount of traffic and their speed. I’m worried that with
the increase of housing it’s only going to make our rides more dangerous, as drivers don’t respect speed limits.
Please keep the overlay as it was intended. Don’t put money over our safety. Thank you
There has been way to much building in the Sonoran Preserve area! This is destroying the beauty of the desert. I
have lived in Phoenix area for 49 years and this once beautiful desert is being destroyed by over developing.
Some of the most recent developments off the I‐17 and Dexalita destroy some of the mountain to put more
homes in the area. When this happens we are not being good stuarts of the land. We need to find away to live
Page 1213
I have lived at this address for 20 years and have watched the area grow. My wife and I have hiked and biked in
the Sonoran Preserve area hundreds of times, and now we have introduced our children to a love of nature
through seeing Olive the owl on Hawk's Nest Trail and wildflower blooms biking along the Apache Wash trail. In
the middle of a growing city, this Preserve is an oasis that allows residents from near and far to relax and escape
the pace of city life. It magically transports visitors to a place that feels quiet and free. Please help us preserve
this for us and future visitors!
Phoenix is growing at a very rapid rate. If something is not done now to save lands, there will be no desert areas
left and all wildlife here will perish. We must preserve this unique Sonoran Preserve.
I've lived in this area for the last 3+ years and a major reason we moved here is because of the desert setting
and because it didn't feel as crowded as other parts of the Valley. Sad to see our beautiful preserve turned into
crappy track homes.
I'm mainly just concerned with the increased amount of traffic new housing developments will create.
I hike from Apache Wash frequently as well as the trails in Sonoran Preserve South and don’t want to see the
desert character of these areas impacted. Please hold Taylor Morrison to these rules. They were put in place for
a reason. Don’t allow them to disregard them.
The amount of traffic we already have on dove valley is excessive. We do not need to add more.
I am signing this petition as I care deeply about keeping the Sonoran preserve sacred. It is important to preserve
the existing ecosystems. Additionally, This area is already dangerous with increasing traffic.
I love cycling here and I don't want that to change.
It is nature at its finest. The desert is dwindling especially in this area with all of the commercial building and
housing going up. The hot air balloons are even running out of space to take off from and land on. Dove Valley
Road / Sonoran Desert Drive has become a speedway and dumping ground. It is a shame that people have such
disregard for such a beautiful area and putting up more housing will only make it worse. Years ago we were told
that no homes would be built off of that road. I know because I used to live in Carefree Crossings and attended
many meetings about it. Listen to the people for a change and leave this area alone. It was built for people to
enjoy it, not destroy it.
I want to preserve the desert. We have a water shortage not enough water now for the people that live here.
Not enough schools why aren’t the building responsible for building schools for the children?
We do not want this new development because we love the natural desert we chose to live near. In addition,
we do need the excessive amount of traffic that such a development would cause.
The original proposal to conserve the ecosystem while allowing for reasonable growth is threatened. The
proposed increase will increase vehicle traffic, noise, pollution, and make biking along this area unsafe.
The beauty and tranquility of the Sonoran Preserve is vital to the character of this community’s identity.
With so much growth in Arizona & Phoenix in particular, it is vital to retain the open spaces for all residents to
use and enjoy ‐ there was great foresight when determining preserves and buffered lands around them. The
roads ‐ current and even proposed new ones ‐ won’t be able to safely support the sudden surge of vehicles and
will most definitely increase the traffic volume and many drivers, bikers and pedestrians will experience a
greater risk of accidents. Please listen to the residents in the area that will be most impacted. Thank you.
We don't have the infrastructure to support any additional growth. I wish we could halt the issuance of any
further building permits in the state until we can guarantee the people of AZ that we will have adequate water
and energy resources to match projected growth rates. We can NOT have growth outpace supply.
Our house backs up to the desert. We bought that house because it backs up to the desert, I want to to keep
our view and our slower simple lifestyle there and not turn its into a big city feel.
I don’t want to see traffic increase. I would like to see the desert stay peaceful and empty.
Want beauty while biking
Page 1214
I have cycled on this road for close to a decade. It’s been one of the only “safe” roads. In addition, the preserve
is quiet and beautiful and has remained a short distance from home. As traffic gets worse we are losing that
quiet, beautiful Arizona gem.
We specifically moved to this area b/c of the preserve and the peacefulness that it brings to our lives and
neighborhood. District guidelines are in place for a reason and should not be adjusted for a greedy developer.
I enjoy cycling on the road. It is a safe, fast, and serene place to ride my bike. The crisp early morning air,
sunrise, and hot air balloons, are a real treat.
Keep the beauty of the desert and keep traffic minimal on Sonoran Desert Drive as there are no crossroads to
take as an alternate route if traffic is heavy on Sonoran Desert Drive.
This area is vital for wildlife and preserving the bike trails be able to trail ride in the unspoiled desert we don’t
need anymore traffic thru here it would completely ruin the whole area
My household enjoys both biking and hiking along the Sonoran Desert Drive several times a week. One of the
main reasons I moved out of the Kierland area was to escape the traffic/congestion. Please don't turn my
beautiful Sonoran Preserve into a traffic nightmare. Uphold the safeguards that make this preserve a treasure.
Thank you, Councilman Waring.
We back up to Dove Valley.....the traffic has already increased exponentially over the past few years and people
use this road as a freeway....safety for our kids and everyone in our community is a huge concern.
My family and I use these trials for recreation purposes. We are also concerned as a community for the traffic as
well as how it will effect the wildlife.
Please do not overcrowd our area and stress our resources. Sonoran Desert Drive is beautiful and offers
wonderful opportunity to be outside and healthy. Please preserve this area.
We moved here for the natural beauty of this area and the outdoor freedom to run, bike and hike. In addition
we wanted to get away from all the congestion and crazy traffic. I am concerned for pedestrian safety and not
being able to enjoy the wilderness in peace. Not to mention all the traffic added to Sonoran Desert Drive which
is no longer relaxing and becomes stressful on a daily basis.
Congestion. Rezoning opens doors to more rezoning. Will cost the county money to widen roads. And I like less
people around.
We need less development and more room to safely enjoy nature with trails and outdoor activities. Dove Valley
Rd is already a speed zone and super trafficked, more development is a detriment to our beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. Please reject this proposal.
This is my neighborhood..I live here. I hike these beautiful trails five times a week. There are plenty of acres of
desert in other areas. People come from all over the valley to hike and bike here.This land has been set aside
for this and should not be taken away.
Sonoran Desert Drive is a safe haven for athletes and cyclists. It’s the one road in the Phoenix area in which
cyclists and feel safe in the road without the fear of being hit by cars.
We use the parkway weekly for our bike training, along with thousands of other riders. This parkway has forever
been a haven for riders looking to escape the dangerous city streets of Arizona, and bringing more traffic or
reducing our ability to use the parkway could result in a major increase in vehicle‐bike related accidents which
unequivocally result in harm to the cyclist ‐ often fatally. The proposed development could spell disaster for the
cycling community in Arizona.
There is already a staggering amount of traffic between the preserves and additional housing per acre only
harms these sacred areas. We are growing at a staggering rate and sacrificing our beautiful lands and existing
safe guards isn't the right approach to addressing this growth. The land and homes will sell and the only reason
to increase hones per acre is to increase their profits.
Page 1215
I urge you not to ignore the Desert Character Overly District and over develop one of the few remaining
preserves in city limits so a developer can make more money. Please consider your constituents way of life and
safety over profits for a corporation. Thank you for your consideration.
I run on those trails weekly at Apache wash trailhead, I bike Sonoran Parkway road safely multiple times weekly.
If traffic/construction/and wildlife are destroyed it would be incredibly heartbreaking.
I specifically bought a home in this area in part because of the Sonoran Desert Preserve and the numerous
hiking trails available. The traffic has increased substantially in the past several years. The closure of I 17 in
either direction already turns our neighborhood into a parking lot at times. Sincerely, Terry
I live in this area, I use the hiking trails and bike paths along Sonoran drive on a weekly basis, I love looking out
into the Desert everytime and taking in its natural beauty it has to offer, Roof tops would hinder this…. If the
county/city ever needs additional funding they can have Police officers patrol Sonoran Desert drive and would
run out of paper giving traffic tickets, its already a race track with the driving practices on this road,,,,, more
congestion will make it worst and a lot more dangerous than itvis now, I quit riding my bike in the bike lane on
that road, I ride on the bike path to the north of the road for that reason…
Preserve land is sacred and should maintained as suck to keep the value to it's community members.
This development will ruin the last open space area around the Sonoran Preserve. There are plenty of other
housing developments in the north Phoenix area closer to I‐17 that will assist those moving to the valley. This
development is not necessary. There are also major water, traffic and fire concerns with this new development.
1. Concerned about wildlife being displaced and natural habitats being significantly reduced 2. High occupancy
buildings coupled with houses will bring more traffic and pollution and impact the infrastructure 3. Impact on
city resources such as water especially scary as water levels are so low 4 impact to education facilities ‐ schools
are over crowded
We truly need to preserve our Sonoran Desert and we need to maintain the original reason this area has been
preserved. We are rapidly losing our Sonoran Desert and our recreation areas, not to mention our wildlife are
losing their homes. We can’t be nothing but concrete. We should take pride in living in a beautiful part of town.
Please Preserve!!
We cannot keep moving the wild habitat out of their homes! Moving into this community we were told this
reserve was here to stay so we would never have to worry about build going up on it ‐ clearly, that has changed.
Do not let greed destroy our quality of life.
The preserve and drive are my little bit of sanctuary to and from work. I enjoy the beautiful flowers and desert
landscape daily, not to mention the gorgeous sunsets and sunrises I see every day. Please keep this part of
Arizona as it is.
We are loosing the beauty that was one of the huge reasons for moving where we live. All you are you doing is
bringing more infrastructure. I understand that growth needs to take place but I think that it should be done in a
much better way. Putting up a bunch of houses on top of each other is not the solution. I see greed takes the
upper hand over more intelligent decisions. Thank you
One of the reasons I moved to this area was because of the Preserve and being told it would not be developed.
How incredibly sad we're even needing to have this discussion. Please do the right thing and save the Sonoran
This preserve is important for the community and wildlife!
This beautiful desert area needs to maintain its character and uniqueness. It’s the reason why many people live
in the area. Stop!!
Sara Rovarino
Keep as much preserves and mountains natural
I want to keep the area accessable for recreation.
Page 1216
We moved to our current home to enjoy the benefits of having access to the Sonoran Preserve. The Desert
Character Overlay District was created to preserve the integrity of this precious commodity, if it is ignored, the
beauty and recreational benefits of the preserve will be significantly reduced.
We need to preserve our natural habitat.Increased construction around the area already put too much load on
traffic and school system.We have no new building of schools and we are worried where all these will get
We need to save our desert preserve and wildlife. There are plenty if other placex in the area and in Phoenix
where it is more appropriate and less disruptive to build.
Save wildlife and the desert
There are plenty of other places to build, these this beautiful piece of land beautiful. Keep the traffic down for
those of us who use this area for biking. Oh yes, and where are you getting all the water to support all of this
new construction?!?
Please follow the Desert Character Overlay District plan. Keep traffic low and undeveloped land so we can enjoy
the preserve.
There has already been enough building along Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert Drive. Please leave the preserve so
that we can continue to enjoy its beauty.
I live around the corner in Sonoran Foothills community and one of the reasons we moved here was to be able
to bike on Dove Valley and Sonoran Desert, as we train for Triathlons year round. Every car you add to these
roads makes this more dangerous for us. I have almost been hit twice by cars coming out of Sonoran Gate
community. The proposed development of over 1400 homes will destroy this very special area.
Like to go hiking there and see the natural views.
The Sonoran Preserve is important to me because of the beauty if the area and the animals that call it home.
Sonoran Desert Drive needs to remain a less busy road so it is safe for the bicyclists that use it for exercise and
the people that walk the path along the road and preserve.
Myself and so many of my neighbors and friends hike this area on a regular basis! There is a nest that an owl
comes back to every year! There are beautiful fees of the amazing area in which so many of us call home! Please
don’t destroy an area we love and cherish
To be able to get out of the city and experience the peacefulness and beauty of the Sonoran desert so easily is
what makes this area unique. Once it is gone it is gone.
We love biking on the path along the reserve with our 2 girls, crossing Sonoran Desert is already a bit nerve
wracking with current traffic, I can't imagine how much this would increase given the added homes. This is such
a beautiful stretch of road and adding these homes would greatly impact the noise, traffic and beauty of this
area. Not to mention the surrounding grocery stores, roadways and restaurants are already stretched so thin
because the number of homes has increased greatly without the other resources to support it!
The increase in traffic volume that will result from additional development in this area is not sustainable or in
keeping with the objectives of the preserve.
Doubling or tripling the number of housing units is not sustainable and concerning that it will impact the
surroundings negatively
Increased traffic, depleted water, and loss of vital desert preserve. In addition, approval here increases the
likelihood that thousands of additional homes will be added throughout the preserve in years to come.
There is enough congestion and traffic as it is. Not to mention, our beautiful desert is continually being built in.
I am extremely concerned about over building at the expense of the natural desert. Loss of natural
settings/habitat, increased traffic, speeding, congestion, crime, burglary, all the issues that come with high
My concern is for public safety first and foremost. In addition to the widening of the Sonoran roadway and the
disregard for the serenity of the desert. Finally I feel the City is growing too fast with little regard for Public
Safety and infrastructure growth.
Page 1217
I've lived in this area for many years and treasure the Sonoran Desert Preserve beyond measure. As an avid
hiker and lover of the unique beauty, plant life and wildlife of the Sonoran Desert, I feel privileged to be able to
enjoy this natural area as part of my "everyday." I'm also aware and incredibly proud of the hard work and
careful thought that went into preserving this land in the first place. It was a job so very well done, and I would
be incredibly disappointed and dispirited to see those efforts and safeguards dismantled in any way.
The beauty of the desert & also a place for the animals to live. We gave already taken enough of their home.
Enjoy bicycling through the preserve. The road is too narrow for the traffic already using the parkway.
My wife and I have a true love for the desert surroundings and this is what brought us to Sonoran Gate
Community. In order to keep the beauty of the desert, it must be limited to homeowners. We hike, mtn bike,
and road cycle throughout this area and with the more chance of new development comes the increase in
traffic. My wife was hit by a car while riding on the road because a driver was speeding and not paying
attention. With little to no law enforcement on Dove Valley Rd. Sonoran Desert Drive, it's expected for drivers
to obey the speed limit but that is not the case, we live here and we see it every day and we are concerned
about more development on a large scale to come into play. If your serious about appreciating the natural
preserves then we challenge you to show it and not let the love of money ditract you from what your heart is
telling you. I hope you please take a deeper look before you decide. Thank you
So many animals will get displaced from there natural habitats.
Preserving our beautiful desert and its wildlife is crucial. This is what makes this area so special and why many of
us chose to live here. This project will significantly add to the traffic and pollution and negatively effect this
natural environment.
Safe and beautiful area to hike and bike.
Please preserve this pristine piece of Sonoran Desert for the native flora and fauna and for our future
To preserve the natural desert. Traffic is already excessive. This area is amazing for bike rides, hiking & exercise.
Let’s keep it that way.
Beautiful, wildlife, reduced traffic : )
I moved to the area after serving in the military for 25 years because of its natural beauty and proximity to the
preserve. The building in this area has skyrocketed in recent years. Future development of the preserve will
only deplete the area of its scenery and overpopulation of an already strained region of north Phoenix.
It is one of the most beautiful areas of the valley. Please dont spoil it.
It is important to save the Preserve and Drive because developers and their need for more and more money is
literally killing the desert and taking away all things that are indigenous to this perfect State I have lived in my
whole life, born and raised. I have worked up in this area for 20 plus years and it has been so sad to see the loss
of the desert. The Sonora Desert Drive is something so special and one of the few places left in the Valley that
makes you feel like you are really in the desert without thousands of pieces of property. Please do not take
away the beauty of these areas!!!
The Sonoran preserve is just that, “A preserve”. It was specifically zoned to prevent this kind of development,
or any development for that matter. We use this area almost on a daily basis for hiking, biking and driving on
the parkway. If these projects are developed and built I will seriously consider leaving this area and moving to a
quieter place. These builders should look for other areas not designated as preserves to build their housing.
The natural desert is one of the most unique places and somehow we have to realize it is something we cannot
afford to destroy. I understand the need for homes and such, but please leave this area be. Please!
We need to keep as much nature untouched and beautiful.
The preserve was set aside for a reason. And the reason was not to then go back and develops it a few years
later. Leave the preserve a preserve. There is plenty of other land to develope.
As a cyclist, I truly enjoy being able to ride on Sonoran Parkway and enjoy the beauty of the desert. Over
developing this area would destroy our landscape. I truly hope that our city will choose not to over develop and
keep the natural beauty intact
Page 1218
My family and I enjoy walking, hiking, and driving by the preserve and the planned Verdin development on a
daily basis. It is a highlight of our day and one of the only areas in Phoenix that people can enjoy the natural
beauty of the desert, because it maintains the desert character overlay. It would be very disheartening if this
beautiful surrounding area loses its desert character. I trust that members of the Phoenix city council will reject
the request to maintain the desert character overlay. Thank you.
It’s imperative to preserve and protect the wildlife and their natural habitat. This area is already exploding with
growth & traffic.
Please stop encouraging overgrowth. We do not have sufficient resources for the population growth. Let the
desert live. There should not be such things as zoning changes that crowd people and houses into areas to allow
developers to make money and walk away.
My husband and I moved into the area specifically for the trails and wilderness of the Sonoran Preserve. We
hike the trails at least twice a week with our dogs. Please do not allow more encroachment just for the sake of
making more money! I am a retired registered nurse and served the indigent populations and can't afford to
move again. Please stop this!
We live in the Sonoran Gate community. I’m also a cyclist. We moved here to escape congestion and enjoy the
outdoors. All of that is threatened with this current building frenzy. Why would we abandon the express
purpose of these Preserves, so carefully planned and uniquely executed?! And where are we finding a
sustainable water supply for this unbridled development? This is madness.
Destroying desert habitat, overpopulating an area not intended to. Negative effects on property value.
This area can not support anymore homes. We don’t have the commercial needed. Also, we need to preserve
the desert. That is a popular scenic drive and hiking area.
Protect the Sonoran preserve
It is a beautiful drive and I am sad to see they have done any development along this stretch of road. I thought
this was a preserve but it doesn't seem like it lately with all of the signs I have seen go up lately.
Preserve the natural beauty of the AZ desert.
People already speed like crazy on this road and I'm afraid accidents will go up
I ride in the Preserve and along the Drive four or five times a week.
We are already experiencing high volume traffic and with the micro chip company, the traffic will be
unbearable. I believe in growth but we need to preserve what’s left with our AZ desert.
Conservation will protect the wildlife. Driving them out of their natural habitat could put some animals at risk of
extinction. There are other desert areas/land that could be built on. Preserving will help reduce our footprint
and help reduce traffic and pollution.
Please adhere to the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards. We need space to walk, bike, play and enjoy
the natural beauty of the desert.
Keeping natural habitats for the animals that belong here. We are on their land and need to be cognizant of
that. Also, future generations need to be able to enjoy nature as it is meant to be.
Upon moving to my home in Sonoran Commons I was told all this state land would stay undeveloped. That was
a key factor in purchasing my home because I love the drive, but most importantly Hiking and biking. It was very
disappointing when the Taylor Morrison community built where I was told no homes would be and increasing
more homes and traffic would be disappointing not to mention destroy the sonoran desert further. Please do
not allow this to happen!
Maintain the natural open space in this areas Traffic congestion issues
My family hikes and bikes in this area and there is already too much traffic and disruption in this area. The traffic
on Cave Creek Rd. and Sonoran Desert Drive is very congested and getting worse. Housing needs to be more
controlled in this area to avoid infrastructure problems and environmental impacts.
Leave the desert un touched
We need to preserve it for the wildlife that lives in it and keep the beauty of the desert environment in tact.
Page 1219
We bought a home in this area in 2009 with the idea that the Sonoran Preserve would remain a Preserve. We
and many of our neighbors enjoy using the walking, hiking and biking trails because of its serenity. Please don't
let the lure of developers'money start chipping away at it. The city invested a lot to create the trails and the
Apache Wash trailhead. Let's preserve the Preserve.
The traffic needs to stay low for cyclist and hiker safety. The noise pollution would be overbearing. I hike there
year round and the traffic is already too much. The light pollution and noise would bring harm to wildlife and the
flora of the area. Keep the surrounding area cool by adding no more concrete and asphalt. Please do not
eliminate the protections placed to keep our Sonoran Preserve, preserved. If you allow people to encroach on
the preserve further, you'd no longer be able to call it a "preserve." Perhaps the Sonoran Development, or the
Former Sonoran Preserve, or the Sonoran Encroachment. Not good. I've lived here 12 years and the preserve
gets more and more use by people who want to enjoy it. If you roll back these protections even an inch, people
will just keep pushing and keep pushing, until all of those inches add up to no more preserve. Stand strong. I
hope you get a lot of responses. Please do not mess with the preserve.
We selected this area to live, in part, based on the feeling of being closer to nature. The Sonoran Preserve
played a big part in that feeling. The loss of any Preserve open space or the increase in traffic thru the Preserve
will diminish that feeling. Please require all developers to comply with existing develop restrictions and do not
"lessen" those restrictions. ‐ Thank you...
Our family enjoys the scenic drive down Sonoran Desert Drive. I’m saddened to hear they already have plans to
develop some of that land. The dessert landscape and easy access to trails from Fireside are unique to living in
Norterra and I would hate to see that change. It’s already becoming over crowded up here and traffic is
effected. Please consider preserving our beautiful desert landscape.
Concerned about traffic on current roadway & effects on wildlife habitats. As well as construction dirt, debris &
trash.
Maintain the beauty and areas to hike.
We live in the area and do not need to have more houses built, apartments, etc. The traffic is becoming
unbearable, and to abolish the desert is a terrible thing for the wildlife and beauty of the desert. I enjoy hiking
Natural beauty
I moved up in this area to get away from the city, crowds and traffic, enjoy the outdoors to hike and cycle.
It’s such a beautiful, natural area. No more development!
To keep our desert preserves for walking and hiking viewing the beautiful scenery NOT more houses. I moved up
here because of the secluded area and the ability to walk to trails and trailhead. Traffic has gotten so bad on
Dove valley road. Bikers (I) ride this road all the time and won’t be able to during construction and after as
traffic will make it too dangerous. I personally don’t even feel my neighborhood should not have been built here.
I use the preserve for hiking. Get out into nature but close by the house.
Great hiking and exploring area.
Beautiful desert and shouldn’t be changed for housing
As a frequent hiker it is important to regulate traffic and protect our beautiful Sonoran desert ecosystem.
Primary reason we moved to this area from Houston is to avoid the glut of development and related traffic that
we had in Texas. Please let us retain the environment we fell in love with back in 2010.
My children and I enjoy riding bikes on the preserve and enjoy the open desert environment.
For the animals. We can’t continue to build on their land. They are constantly being pushed out. This earth
cannot sustain all the building
I am signing this because we would not have moved to this area had we known it was even possible for a
developer to unilaterally request a community density plan, carefully and deliberately produced and agreed
upon, be thrown out so a company can increase profit. I question the ethics of a company that would even
propose it. I question the ethics of a local government that would even entertain it.
I moved to this house 10 years ago to move out of the “city” and be near desert‐stop building so much up here!
Page 1220
There has been enough development in this area. Stop crowding out the wildlife.
It is important to keep open lands for the wildlife in the area. Building way too much in the area.
Please don’t let greedy developers have their way!
The Sonoran Preserve is truly the most incredible place to hike, bike, and just enjoy the beautiful desert. Just
driving through brings my family so much peace. For it to be surrounded by dense development and traffic
would steal the joy it brings from to the whole community, as well as visitors who are lucky enough to see some
of our most spectacular views.
This desert area is beautiful and with more and more houses being built, this will reduce the amount of natural
preserve we have to enjoy. I love to hike in this area.
Keep the beauty and peacefulness of this special area. Protect wilderness and cyclists. Cut down on traffic. It is a
rare beauty we cannot afford to lose.
The Sonoran Preserve and surrounding area are why we moved to the North Valley 7 years ago. The natural
beauty and outdoor activities make it our special home. We need to manage and control growth so it will not
negatively impact our surroundings with excessive traffic. Thank‐you.
Enjoying the desert environment is something we need to protect so that we can continue to share it with
We moved to this area because of the beauty of the preserve and the desert areas around us. The area is
already congested with traffic and adding more subdivisions will just clog our streets, increase pollution,
displace animals and ruin the desert. Please do not let that happen.
Safe cycling route
Being able to walk , enjoying the beautiful landscape the LORD make.
The development will increase the footprint traffic and damage to these natural areas and habits. We must look
forward to responsible growth in unity with our surroundings and not just perceived revenues.
Beautiful hiking area and bike riding.
It's going to change the complete landscape of our community. I do not want an excessive amount of traffic.
We have lived in Sonoran foothills for 13 years. We have always loved how quiet it is up here and love the
beauty of the desert. Please do not build more homes and ruin all the great things we have up here!
The Sonoran preserve and Sonoran desert drive are such beautiful parts of AZ. If it is too crowded with traffic
and development it will be taking away from all the cyclists and great hiking trails.
I often go hiking in the preserve for the peacefulness, seeing wildlife, and being surrounded by nature. I bike ride
along Sonoran desert drive and feel safe due to very little traffic. I will be devastated if homes get built on our
beautiful preserve. Animals will suffer, people will suffer, and preserve plant life will be killed. This should not
happen. Preserve means preserve!
This is an essential open nature recreation space who live and visit the area. Protecting spaces like this helps
make this area of PHX metro special, sane, and attractive to so many who use it. It’s therapeutic.
It’s getting too crowded and we need to preserve this beautiful area. It was a purchasing amenity for us that
this preserve would always be left alone. Completely unfair being sold under these terms and then little by
little all the beauty surrounding us is rezoned and built upon.
No wanting any more home delvelopers tearing up the preserves. With the additional Verizon zone site there
will be to many dangerous EMF’s in the community
I live very close to the Sonoran Preserve. My family and I love living near the preserve because we get to enjoy
beautiful hiking and biking trails right in our back yard. The trails are clean, well maintained and much less
crowded than other trails in Phoenix, such as Camelback Mountain and Piestewa Peak. The Sonoran Preserve is
the reason we moved the North Valley. And we moved here based on the growth parameters identified by the
Desert Character Overlay District, which were instilled to safeguard the Preserve. Please don’t alter the growth
density plans, it’s not good for the viability of the Preserve and it’s not fair to the residents who moved to the
area based on the development measures in place.
Page 1221
I believe it is vital to preserve the Sonoran desert lands. The more we build the more we push wild life out of
their habitats and into neighborhoods where they inevitably will get injured or killed. If we keep building on
these lands we won't be the Sonoran desert anymore, we will just have to explain to our grandkids what the
Sonoran desert once looked like.
I very much enjoy the drive through there. Traffic has already increased too much as it is.
We need to protect our beautiful desert. There are many other areas to build on so we can all appreciate the
scenery. After all this is why we live here.
We moved to this area to enjoy the beautiful desert landscape that it offers unlike many other Phoenix areas.
To destroy this beauty that offers hiking, biking, and general nature opportunities so close to home would be
devastating for my family, not to mention the traffic that it would bring. Our neighborhood is already being
robbed of its quiet and peace from the houses already built on this road and it’s use as a through street. People
speed through at 50+ miles per hour to the point that it is difficult for me to turn left out of my gate. I can’t
imagine the impact on this traffic should more homes be allowed through the preserve. Let’s keep this beauty
to enjoy. Things like this are disappearing from the Phoenix area. We must save this.
The safety of low development it brings to being active is a great outlet in AZ.
An agreement was made to limit the number of homes for the area, why now is it ok to go back on that. Will
bring more traffic and ruin to area from overpopulation.
I live in the area and my family and I walk, bike, and hike in the preserve daily. I also see all the animals who live
in and rely on the preserve.
It is my training ground. I spend countless hours a week there riding in the bike lane, running on designated
sidewalks & trails. It is regarded, by local athletes, as a safe stretch of road to cycle on due to the generous bike
lane and limited traffic entering/exiting Sonoran Desert Dr.
This is one of the most beautiful areas in the valley. The trails, bike lanes, and running paths are utilized by a
large number of triathletes. Not to mention the large number of mountain bikers. Keeping this area of land free
of traffic will ensure the wildlife can thrive.
Taylor Morrison is a horrible company, they’re not truthful and when the job is done your stuck with a shitty
house. I regret ever purchasing a home from them in this area. They’re is a lot of wildlife and having the desert
overlay taken off the this absurd amount of homes is going to cause destruction of the wildlife and their homes.
If we keep building on all this desert there will not be any left for our children and their children to enjoy. Please
It is a spectacular preserve and should kept that way. This area can’t handle the traffic now let alone of more
developments are added.
This road is a cyclists haven, and a beautiful part of the North Phoenix desert. Let’s keep it that way.
I am concerned about the volume of cars, traffic and safety. There have already been fatal accidents for
motorists and bicyclists on that road/area. I am concerned about ruining the integrity of the beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. PLEASE don’t let this happen!!
No need for more development eating up our desert.
To preserve the beauty and nature of the Sonoran Desert
When does this stop? We have a responsibility to our next generation of children to save our desert for them to
enjoy. Take the building elsewhere. PRESERVE what is left of our precious desert
Marcella Mccormack
The Sonoran Preserve is a beautiful area that lends this neighborhood a great amount of character and appeal.
Over‐development would greatly detract from this, leaving it just another sprawl.
I want it to remain natural. Don’t want more noise, development coming to the area.
Cycling and hiking in the area
We need to preserve our natural preserve, too many houses, too many cars.
The amount of traffic increase will greatly harm the ecosystem as well as increased foot traffic in this unique
Page 1222
It's important to keep the preserve as it was originally planned for the future. There is a concern for water
during a drought in Arizona and the Anthem water table is low. That road is very congested with traffic and it's
only two lanes.
Save the preserve
I’ve lived in the preserve area since I was very little. We need to keep the desert a desert, our native animals
are continually being forced to co habitate with humans and it’s not going welk. Continue to give them their
space so that we can all live together without hostile interaction
We moved up here to be away from the crowds and we love the desert landscape And the air quality is better
for our son who has asthma
Save the desert!
We moved here 3 years ago. We knew we wanted this home when we were driving around the home and drove
down sonoran desert drive. We loved that the desert was so close to us, that we were going to live to close to a
preserve that our kids could learn about the Arizona and the desert right out their back door.
I use this area for cycling and running. Additional congestion will make it unsafe for these activities. We are
losing more and more areas where it is safe for recreation. The preserve provides safe space for recreation and
adds value in its current state to the residents of the Phoenix metro area.
Our desert is beautiful. There won’t be much of it left if it keeps getting built on.
We live in a largely unspoiled Area of the city. We chose this location for its natural beauty and remoteness
from the busy‐ness of the city. We enjoy the outdoor activities it has to offer without the noise and pollution we
see elsewhere. Please help preserve this area for future generations to enjoy.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve is a beautiful area full of wildlife and desert vegetation. We must preserve and
protect portions of our desert to keep balance in our environment.
My family and I love to hike this area, especially to feel like we’re away from city life and enjoying the natural
outdoors. That is one of the reasons why we chose to live in this area was because of the preserve.
I urge City Council to require Taylor Morrison to comply with Desert Character Overlay safeguards. We moved
to this area because of the close proximity to hiking and biking and close to nature. This is necessary for
people’s physical and mental well being.
Preserve landscape, Mountain View’s, prevent traffic
I prefer to keep the Somoran Preseve “wild” for all to enjoy. Please stop taking beautiful desert away from the
residents that moved here to be near it.
Please do not ignore the Desert Character Overlay District. As it already stands, the volume of traffic on
Sonoran Desert Drive is quite high and negatively impacting the surrounding preserve with increased pollution,
roadkill and noise. Increasing the number of homes built as well as the traffic flow will greatly diminish this
beautiful and precious land that was so wisely set aside for protection. Please preserve the Sonoran Desert
Preserve values. Once it is gone it cannot be replaced.
I purchased my house on the southern boundary of Sonoran Gate with the intent of enjoying the serenity of the
desert in my backyard. This expansion will teplace my view with a 6 lane high traffic road. The Scenic Dove
Valley road will also become increasingly busy affecting outdoor activities such as biking.
I really enjoy living near this natural area and enjoy the hiking and biking opportunities that are available.
It was designed to be protected. It is that simple. There is already too many cars going through that preserve.
My family and I hike at this preserve every week. I take friends to it, have had Girl Scout events, and even
volunteer to clean up the trails. It is one of the most gorgeous gems in Phoenix. In addition to that, numerous
animals call it their home. It is not ok to take that away from the people of Phoenix.
Page 1223
While the continued expansion of homes and building into this area is inevitable and needed, the maintenance
of the Desert Character Overlay is important to keep the beauty and feel of this area. The residents who live
here moved here for a reason, and we appreciate the forethought that went into the Desert Character Overlay
originally. Please do not abandon this. It would be one thing if the builder were building reasonably priced
homes to assist with the affordable housing shortage, but they are not. This request is purely for the financial
advantage of the builder and the detriment of our community.
The Sonoran preserve area is vital to providing a habitats for all the wonderful creatures and wildlife in the area.
It also provides for great walking trails for people to enjoy and get exercise while exploring all that Arizona has
We love the natural area of Sonoran Preserve! Adding more homes is going to take away the beauty of this land.
We cannot allow new developments to destroy our desert.
I hike and bike there regularly. Maintaining “green space” in the area is important for Phoenix’s overall well‐
being/balance.
The infrastructure is not setup for a development of this size and the tax payers shouldn’t bear the cost to
I live in the vicinity of the preserve. I moved here to be close to nature and removed from the hustle of town. I
have enjoyed having wild animals pass through my backyard, but since all of the building along Sonoran Desert
Drive/Dove Valley began, wildlife sightings near my home have decreased dramatically. We are edging the
native species out of their rightful territory. Please do not butcher the desert any further.
All of the building is already over done. It's taking away any part of the beauty left in the area. My family does
alot of biking and hiking in that area and it doesn't need to be ruined with more structures. Leave AZ alone and
stop overtaking anything left. The traffic is insane. Why do we need more of it in the area?! That drive is one of
the last drives left near by that is ALMOST untouched.
There are plenty of areas to do future developments we shouldn’t marginalize the beauty of the Sonoran
I enjoy taking hikes with my family and dog. It is so wonderful to get out of the city and neighborhood to
experience nature. We also enjoy taking our bikes along the Sonoran Desert Drive to safely ride without traffic
and congestion. I do not want to lose this ability to development. There are so many other areas available for
development without jeopardizing the beauty that is preserved in this area.
The area should be preserved for enjoying the natural surroundings.
I’ve lived in the north valley for almost 10 years. I’ve seen the desert in northern Phoenix disappear and the
buyers of this land, though proclaim, they will do right by the desert, they have not. I’m a current owner of a
Taylor Morrison home and I can tell you they made multiple shortcuts and did not take care of the land. I
respect that Phoenix is growing but a lot of the glamour of living here is the beautiful desert not that far from
“town”. I would love to not have to travel further north to bloody basin or 7 springs to merely enjoy the desert.
Please reconsider allowing these desert destroying companies to continue killing phoenix’s charm. ‐ james
I visit the Sonoran Preserve frequently and enjoy the solitude the preserve has to offer more traffic in the
area would ruin the natural beauty of this area. Thank you for considering this petition. Curtis Johnson
Hiking and the overall access to the outdoors
It's a beautiful, natural preserve. It's a generous drive and the hiking and biking trails amid the serene desert are
therapeutic.
The Sonoran Desert is home to many species. It's important for their survival that their habitat isn't cut up by
roads and other development.
I love the purity of this area. Excessive homes will ruin the beauty.
Walking along the Sonora preserve desert in a safe manner is very important for my kids
Traffic on the preserve road is already quite busy during rush hour. Adding more homes will increase the danger
of the road and damage the beautiful desert.
We need to preserve the hiking and biking trails as well as the bike lane on Desert Sonoran Drive to keep it safe
for pedestrians and cyclist.
Page 1224
It’s one of the few roads where cyclists and triathletes have a place to ride together without intersections. It’s
great for the community. I use this road almost every weekend
This beautiful area directly impacts myself, my family and friends, my community, safety, economics, our home
value. There will be a great increase of noise to our peaceful lands. Lights will pollute our cherished dark skies.
SO many negatives, would take me pages to list each one! My fam, friends and I travel roads immediate and
near the proposed area, the negative impact will be immense! Loss of life and property is unavoidable with such
grow! The immediate detrimental impact on the scenic beauty of the area, wildlife habitats and migrating
patterns will be detrimental. The scenic beauty of the area will be lost FOREVER!!!! PLEASE do NOT let the
almighty dollar destroy this area! There are so many other, much less impacted areas of land they can build on!
This proposed change in zoning will allow new development that will infringe on our recreational area. Zoning is
there for a reason. Please do not change it.
To preserve the beauty and conservation of the area, as well as safety for cyclist and hikers.
I’d be like to see less traffic and houses. This a beautiful area, and treasure our Sonoran preserve.
We moved here from Chicago to near a more spacious beautiful desert area. We've watched the traffic increase
three fold which takes away from safety and the beauty of the land. We moved her to be near the natural
preserves, hike, bike and enjoy nature. In the almost 6 years we've been here we rarely see the wild life we've
come to love no longer around. Traffic on North Valley is dangerous at times.
The Desert Character Overlay was put in place to preserve open spaces and promote responsible development.
Develeopers should not be allowed to bypass rules and guidelines. Please maintain the integrity of Overlay
safeguards for the sake of the future of our community.
I am concern about the beauty of the Desert Landscape and more concerned about the increase in traffic that
will be on Dove Valley/Sororan Desert Drives. Besides Verdin there is also the new semiconductor plant going
up west of us that will increase traffic. There is also 2 other new housing developments going up on Dove Valley
and also Sonoran Desert Dr west of Paloma Pkwy. This will also increase traffic tremendously on Dove
Valley/Sonoran Desert Drives. Please be concerned that traffic could increase 10 times the current rate and that
your plan to expand lanes is already insufficient.
It is a beautiful place to take a hike through and be surrounded by natural desert landscape
This is a designated Desert Sonoran Preserve. The established trails are used by thousands and the preserve
hosts habitat for Arizona wildlife including javelina, bobcat, coyote, raccoon, ground squirrel and many more.
There are a variety of bird and reptile species Gila Monster, great horned owl, roadrunner, gambles quail, Inca
dove, Cardinals, spotted whip tail and chuckwalla lizards to mention a few. This area of Phoenix cannot be
expanded into a legislated preserve. Too many apartments in the area has already increased crime, drugs and
traffic congestion. Any additional housing and apartment development requests in the north Phoenix area must
be denied. Respectfully, Bill Shackelford. Voting Resident
Since living in Phoenix this has been a place where I can get away to escape the noise of the city. Please don’t
take that away from us. For a lot of people, having a place to get away to is vital to every day life.
I love all the preserved open desert. If there are rules and guidelines already established for a certain amount of
homes built, we need to stay within that, and stop over building whenever a builder wants to cram more homes
Page 1225
The Sonoran Preserve provides plenty of beautiful hiking trails and scenic views. Allowing further development
in the area would destroy that natural beauty, and for what? More man‐made structures? More roads? Phoenix
has grown plenty already. The city needs to focus on improvements to areas that have already been developed
rather than expanding out more and more. Expansion leads to more traffic, more population, more congestion
and pollution. I for one do not wish to see this grown continue unabated. It would become too crowded to
enjoy any more, and it would just end up looking like every other overly populated and crowded section of the
city. Please leave the Sonoran Preserve as it is. Honor the protections that have been set in place rather than
trying to cheat or work around them. Dirty business practices that do not care about such protections, or about
preserving the environment, do not foster good will among the people. It just looks like you want to make a
I moved here to get away from the high volume of homes and traffic in Gilbert and to enjoy the beautiful
surrounding desert trails and nature paths north and south of Sonoran Desert / Dove Valley.
Our beautiful Sonoran desert is truly a gem in Arizona. Please don’t let the developers for the sake of a greedy
dollar ruin our state for our children and grandchildren. If we don’t stop the sprawl now, who and when will it
We are losing the beauty and integrity of the area that makes the Phoenix valley iconic.
I have been hiking at the Sonoran Preserve for years with my son and my dogs. We love the beauty and the
feeling of being in the wilderness just a couple of miles from our house in Valley Vista. I know our area is
experiencing tremendous growth right now but I feel the area on the preserve needs to continue to be
It's rare coming from Vegas to have such a natural landscape. It's so beautiful to have natural landscape and to
have the desert wildlife around our home. There's plenty of other places they can build and they're building
now. Save the preserve and the wildlife. They can build somewhere else that isn't here.
People need places to live but so do animals. The Southwest has beautiful deserts and what makes this place
The desert beauty of this area is its most treasured asset
The beauty of the Sonoran Preserve will be replaced with urban area???? During the hike or bike ride are we
supposed to admire the houses???
Safe exercise and increased traffic would really diminish the roads safety
We must preserve the natural beauty of Arizona. The generations to come deserve to see the natural beauty
that we have today. It is also home to many of Gods creatures and sustains their lives.
Proposed area would block the migration of wildlife through the preserve which is likely its originally intended
purpose. Also, there is not enough water already….
I want to protect the many plants, trails and wildlife. Please don’t destroy this fragile ecosys.
Acres and Acres of land are taken from the wild life. Traffic is horrible.
Seriously? There is so much development going on right now with the chip pant being built, and all of the high
density housing going in around it, we don't need to get any more crowded. Don't ruin what's left of our desert
beauty. These places are where some of us go to enjoy some peace and quiet and escape the population.
DON'T TAKE THAT FROM US. DON'T RUIN IT!!
Over reaching of dwelling concentration will overwhelm the streets, schools and amenities. Full compliance to
the Desert Charter Overlay District safeguards should be fully adhered to.
I do not want the desert destroyed any more than it already has been, it needs to be preserved. I hike daily
along the trails from Apache Wash to Paloma Pkwy, the scenic views are being compromised by building, the
noise of the traffic is ruining the peace of the outside and nearing running me off the road as I try to cross to the
trails. It's insane the number of cars already and Copperleaf development isn't even populated yet. No more
homes to destroy the serenity and beauty of this area.
I participate in running and hiking in the area and treasure the natural beauty of the desert landscape.
I chose this area because of the preserve and hiking trails. We love the motorcycle rides through the area on our
way up to Cave Creek. I already think they are building too much and it’s going to overpopulate and ruin the
very reason we chose to live in this area.
Page 1226
Preserving the open space, flora, and fauna native to the area
I frequently recreate in the area ‐ it is frequented by a lot of people. Both on the road with limited traffic and on
the trails. It would be detrimental to the foundation of the Phoenix Preserves to take away land dedicated to
open space and letting developers tear it apart. Developers can get land further out on the outskirts of town to
develop ‐ not areas already dedicated as open space for all to recreate now and future generations.
The city of Phoenix is running out of desert space because of so many large communities. Taking away the
beautiful desert or desert character overlay to add more concrete and asphalt among houses is deeply
concerning for Phoenicians, tourists, and the wildlife in the area.
It is a beautiful community! I love seeing people rude their bikes, walk, hike, ride atvs so close by but with more
housing it becomes impossible to enjoy the preserve. Save the last piece of Arizona the beautiful desert and wild
life in Phoenix!
It changes the whole landscape of our community. Every available space is being built and we are losing the
beauty of our area.
Two reasons: to preserve the beauty of the preserve and the hone of the animals living there. Second, is the
traffic. We are already experiencing new heavy traffic with our growth up here and adding this will increase it
greatly. I moved up this way because of the lifestyle it afforded without so much traffic. Along with the traffic
comes more accidents, which we are already experiencing, more congestion, etc.
This will affect the local fauna and flora and compromise what is supposed to be a protected ecossystem.
To preserve the beautiful views of the desert and maintain wildlife and landscape.
I live less then a mile away and it’s a beautiful area that should remain the way it is. We hike, bike, and drive to
grandparents house on this beautiful road/preserve. Please let it stay beautiful and let us continue to make
memories here.
Hiking biking wildlife and beauty .....reason why most of us live up here.
This is an important area to keep Phoenix as special as it is. In addition, the growing drought crisis makes the
option of further building less eco friendly.
The Sonoran desert preserve is admired for its standing beauty. Arizona is Home to tons of desert land scenery
that makes our cave creek town so special. Please preserve this land and build soemewhere else
I live on the South‐West edge of the Sonoran Preserve. I am an avid outdoors person that loves the wild flora
and fauna and am concerned about destroying the natural beauty of the preserve as well as the natural habitat
of wild life. I believe that we need to prevent this oasis for recreation and wild life refuge to be altered.
It is important to have open space for recreation and for the planet. We love mountain biking in the preserve.
High density housing is going to adversely impact what is left of the Valley’s open spaces.
We want to preserve the natural beauty and opportunities we have now to bike, hike and pleasant walking with
families and friends while enjoying the beauty of our Sonoran Desert. So please don’t grant permission to build
more housing communities.
This area is one of the only places in the Phoenix metro area that offers a safe place for mountain bikes and
cyclists to ride. The low traffic and large bike lanes are not found anywhere else in the valley. It is a staple for
many recreational athletes and outdoor enthusiasts in the area and should be kept that way!
Page 1227
I am a third generation Phoenician and have lived in North Phoenix most of my life. I have watched the growth
of the valley over the years and am not opposed to progress but it needs to be done thoughtfully and
responsibly. This proposal to increase the number of homes along the Sonoran Desert drive is reckless and
irresponsible. The developers of the Verdin project are not thinking about the residents of the area or the future
generations that will use the preserve but are rather motivated by the lure of maximizing their profits. I am
strongly opposed to discarding the charter and hope that as our representatives you will do the right thing for
the citizens of this area. Seriously take into consideration what’s best for not only the residents but also the
wildlife and the desert itself. This decision will not only impact our quality of life but the quality of life for those
that will come long after we’re gone. A sea of homes and pushing more and more people into an untouched
area of desert is not good for the future of our community.
Beauty of the natural desert provides peace & tranquility in this world of unrest. Don’t destroy the zen
We have so few Desert Lands left for generations to appreciate
we moved up here 12 years ago because it was beautiful with hiking trails and not overly congested with
housing/shopping/traffic etc. please leave our sonoran preserve alone and stop building in it. if people want
congestion they can move into the city areas thank you.
The open space is becoming g increasingly scarce, reducing not only the lands for recreation but also the
My family and I value the Sonoran Preserve and open desert. We've lived next to and used the Sonoran
Preserve for over 15 years. We mountain bike, run, hike, and enjoy nature on these trails multiple times per
week. The surrounding open desert is an integral element contributing to the peace of the Preserve. We were
dismayed at the building of the neighborhood off Dove Valley Rd between the two sections of the Preserve a
few years ago. Please do not crowd the area surrounding and within the beautiful Preserve!
This area is important to preserve. I regularly use this area for recreation and it is an important reason why I
choose to live in the north valley as opposed to other areas in Phoenix. I DO NOT WANT THE NORTH VALLEY TO
TURN INTO CHANDLER OR GILBERT!!!!
My family and I love hiking in the Sonoran Preserve. It’s how we spend our weekends. We would hate to lose
anymore of the land, the atmosphere, the animals. Please save the land. Thank you
Preserve natura
We all know how beautiful the Sonoran Preserve is. Most of us in this area live here to live close to the city, but
still enjoy the beauty of the desert. As a phoenix native, I’ve seen our desert areas shrink…. Not only do humans
have less area to enjoy, the animals have less and less of an area to call home. This is not okay. We need to
preserve this area. While we understand that land is at a premium right now, there are other areas to develop.
I do not want the massive increase in traffic it is already horrible in this area. We do not need more housing
there are plenty already being built.
We moved up to this area because of the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please keep our beautiful land the
way it is.
The area will not be able to handle the congestion of the cars that will need access to the area. Also there
aren't many peaceful areas to drive through anymore, especially when you have had a stressful day. With all of
the other building happening we can't afford to have another development take our land.
I am a resident in the local area and I’m very concerned about excessive traffic and congestion. We have laws on
the books to protect to preserve I don’t think we need to circumvent them now just to build more high density
The natural area surrounding Sonoran Foothills is a treasure. Doubling or tripling the number of housing units is
detrimental to the beautiful nature and wildlife.
We moved from the city specifically to enjoy the natural preserve and wildlife of this area. Also, we were
assured no building would take place along the Sonoran Preserve corridor. Our family loves to bike ride in the
peaceful desert preserve and request that it remains a preserve for our wildlife and for all to enjoy in it’s natural
To keep the nature as treasure and beautiful view
Page 1228
We need to maintain the beauty of the valley. Areas need to be protected and respected so all can enjoy.
We are concerned about the traffic, congestion and noise that this increased housing will cause
GREED at its finest asking to ignore the Desert Character Overlay District... PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS!!!!
Seriously...one more development along the route is no good. Too much traffic now for those who frequent the
area.
One of the main reasons we bought our house here in 2018 was because of it’s location in relation to the
Preserve. Already traffic has become a nightmare with the recent developments and removing the Preserve will
only exacerbate an already horrible problem. Also, to quote the great Joanie Mitchell, “you don’t know what
you’ve got til it’s gone.” Losing the Preserve would cause irreparable damage to the environment and the
We must preserve the Sonoran Desert for not only environmental reasons but for future generations to enjoy
its natural beauty. When I first came here in 2019 and lived near Cave Creek I would always drive out there and
take in the quiet beauty and the stunning sunsets. We need to protect keep this preserved and natural.
Jennifer Walter
Uniquely beautiful desert must be protected. Overly dense housing not consistent with that preservation.
This would allow too much development and over populate the area.
I moved to this location in 2019 to be away from congestion of traffic and buildings. I am already concerned
about the traffic on Sonoran Parkway/Dove Valley. I love the open desert and trails and lack of buildings. This
area needs these open spaces to remain as building and development is moving closer to the preserve on all
sides. Help save some precious desert/animals/freedom and peaceful nightblack skies!
Urban sprawl is harmful. Preserving natural pandas capes should be priority for the city.
This place is an amazing getaway for families to go walk, cycle and hike. It’s nice to go over there without all of
the traffic that goes through there. It is such a beautiful scenery that should not be taken away.
To prevent additional congestion and traffic and to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
We need to keep our natural surroundings for the overall health of our environment.
Will Ruin the wildlife and nature surrounding the preserve in addition to increasing the already challenging
traffic issues on Sonoran desert drive
This road has given me a safe place to learn to ride my bike, and to run. It’s been vital in my mental health,
creating open spaces like this is so key to us, as we saw during the pandemic. Please preserve it!
Cycling and trail running
The sonoran preserve is a beautiful place that is essential to maintaining the ecological balance for wildlife and
vegetation. The developers and owners knew the rules of the overlay district when they decided to develop,
and should be required to follow it. Not doing so benefits only them, and puts the damages on all other citizens.
Protecting preserve areas within an urban community is important and contributes to a healthy quality of life.
Respectful development along the perimeter of a preserve protects the integrity of the native area. I want the
desert overlay left in place as it is the legal vehicle created with intention to accomplish this. We need to be
forward thinking as we approve developments especially when they border preserve areas that were acquired
and built with significant personal and financial resources!
There is no need for additional housing in our area specifically so near a protected preserve. There is not enough
water so support the additional homes and businesses that come with a development such as this.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve is so beautiful and serves MANY purposes. That's why we moved here, and we
don't want to lose it ! We MUST keep development at a reasonable amount.
We need to preserve the area and keep the traffic in North Valley from getting even more dangerous.
Traffic congestion, pedestrian and bicycle safety. Preserving this area from development, as envisioned by the
Desert Character Overlay District.
Page 1229
Becasue we hike the trails regularly and the feeling of being lost in nature so close to home is special. It should
be protected and I hope my daughter can enjoy it the same way one day.
Volume of traffic will be too extreme and hiking, cycling and just walking will be negatively impacted.
ASU has spent millons in studies, to this DAY, of the wildlife is THIS IMMEDIATE area. The area between these
two washes are a habitat for species that exist NO where else. Contact ASU if you don't believe me, they have a
professor that performs studies out there...they have for many years! In addition, the access roads proposed
are between two bridges that are TOO low. There needs to be a NEW study performed on how the destruction
of the plains will affect run off and increased volume in the washes! Otherwise, one heavy monsoon might wash
the people and homes away.
I enjoy hiking and biking in the area. Houses and cars really ruin the beauty of it.
The Desert Character is an important part of Phoenix that needs to be kept preserved and available for all
Phoenicians and other AZ residents to enjoy the natural scene this Sonoran Desert can provide outside of the
busy metropolis of the Phoenix metroplex and other surrounding cities.
We love our desert and the fascinating wild life! Lets all work together to conserve our beautiful desert!
The builder should be held to the character overlay that is in place to ensure the neighborhood fits into the
desert landscape.
As a resident living at Fireside, I have seen javelinas (up to a dozen at a time) and other wild animals come up to
our home looking for food and emptying garbage at night. By tearing down more natural and wild habitat for
additional homes will only increase the existing problems for the animals in the dessert when more of their
natural habitat is torn down. Stop tearing in to the natural surrounding preserve.
We've disrupted enough of the environment.
To much growth for what this area was set up to be.
I do not wish to see this beautiful desert landscape overcome with more traffic and houses.
The open desert landscape is what makes Arizona unique and beautiful. We need to preserve the beauty.
Its a beauty such a pleasure driving thru and seeing the cactus scenery. Already disturbed by the housing that
has already been built
1‐ more traffic 2‐displacing wildlife and plants.
Without a road plan for major increase in traffic and the current drought in AZ, I oppose developments like
We love the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please protect what is left and save the beauty of the dessert.
The Desert Charter Overlay District is in place to protect the Preserve. We are simply asking to maintain
adherence to it. Other than profit, there is no valid reason to break the Charter. If housing shortage is an
argument, then investors should absolutely look to revitalize and invest in existing residential spaces.
The Arizona desert is a truly beauty that nothing else compares to. Large Cati with blooming flowers, mountain
ranges from every aspect, and wildlife that is crucial for our ecosystem; there’s are just a few reasons that make
Arizona great. WE ARE KILLING OUR SONORAN PRESERVE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION AND HOME
DEVELOPMENTS. We do not want more homes, we want to save our preserve!!!! I want my everyone to be able
to drive down Sonoran desert dr and experience the breathtaking views that I get to see everyday I drive to and
from work. This is truly a special place and we need to keep it that way. Taylor Morrison can go find another
place to destroy if they want to make a quick buck. But I don’t want to see it here
I like living in the city with a place to go(the preserve) where you feel like the city is so far away. I hike, mountain
bike and enjoy seeing the wildlife as well as nature in general.
Ekosystem Preservation of natural wild life
Actions need to be taken to preserve the natural landscapes of Arizona. The degradation of lands is reaching a
tipping point. The area does not have the infrastructure, business, school capacity nor natural resources to
support this development. Corporate greed is advancing the rapid expansion of the Sonoran desert and we are
on the cusp of a major water shortages in the region. Enough, have some foresight for future generations for
Page 1230
I think the peace and quiet and a safe place for the Sonoran wildlife to roam freely is vital. We cannot keep
pushing these animals out of there natural habitats. Traffic on Sonoran desert drive has already increased and
to increase it more is simply careless as families riding bikes will be at an increased risk
It's wrong to ignore our Desert Character Overlay District! We bought our home here because of these
protections, and we love our desert! Thank you!
Sonoran Desert Drive is a road I ride almost every single day. Having a safe road to ride on is essential to what I
do for a living. There are limited roads in Phoenix that have as much open space as this one, and it allows for a
safe area to bike and run (on roads or trails). Being a dad, this is extra important because all too often there are
unsafe interactions with cars on various other roads. Sonoran Desert Drive and it's surrounding area is a key
place to experience the outdoors in a safe environment.
We moved up to the area because there was space and open land. We don’t want to live where people are on
top of each other and traffic is out of hand. Don’t ruin our beautiful space.
We need to preserve the natural beauty and wildlife that call the desert home.
This city is growing so fast & we need to preserve some of the beautiful desert landscape. If we keep building
more houses, we will have nothing left. We don’t need more houses!!
We are overbuilding this area. Traffic, water supply, pollution are all contributing factors to limit growth. In
addition, the limited wildlife will be severely impacted
The Preserve was the reason we moved here 14years ago. The city should not be able to re‐zone and stick with
the original plan to leave it for hiking biking etc. There is plenty of land on the west side of I‐17. Way too
much growth, traffic, and Desert lost to developers. with NO regard for the quiet life we enjoy In north Phoenix.
The preserve gives us hiking trails and allows everyone to enjoy the beauty of the Arizona desert and wildlife. It
would also dramatically decrease property values for the people voting for you to remain in office.
Living in the development of Sonoran Desert I am concerned with future development and keeping the natural
environment. We need to ensure that proper development is planned to avoid over growth and increased
This project has the ability to set precedence for any other development. The fact the developer is asking to
refine for more houses and remove the desert overlay is a slippery slope to having high density homes stacked
on what is one of the mist beautiful areas of desert. It is too dense, goes against city plans meant to protect the
desert character of north Phoenix and will bring an influx of traffic to the area. Please look at giving up some
land somewhere else that is not across from a beautiful nature preserve.
Love the beauty of the area. So peaceful to drive along and see the plants and trees, which would be lost
forever with more housing. Please save this beautiful area for our children and all those who come after them.
I drive this road regularly and it’s already getting over populated with traffic with the current development.
More housing and construction will take away the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and will also
increase unwanted traffic.
The preserve to me is a natural area for hiking and biking. There is already a lot of traffic on Sonoran Desert
Drive making this dangerous to road cyclists.
I spend a lot of time in this area due to the beauty and the ability to get away from “the city”. I really love this
area and it’s one of the rare spots we have close to Phoenix.
The Sonoran preserve is a refuge for city dwelling people to escape into nature. It also, and most importantly, is
a sanctuary to native plants and animals. It's a critical part of the Phoenix ecosystem.
Destroying the beauty, and traffic concerns.
Once the natural land is gone we loose the gorgeous desert that many people move here for. Pollution has
gotten much worse in the past few years. More home mean more traffic and even worse pollution. The water
table is getting lower and more homes mean more water usage. We don’t have water for them!
Page 1231
The Sonoran Preserve along Sonoran Desert Drive allows us close appreciation of the scenic desert and its
thriving ecosystem. Other parts of the valley are better equipped for growth and infill. We need to embrace
density where the city is more prepared to support it. This patchwork sprawl into the outer reaches of the
desert chops up the expanse of habitat unnecessarily. If it continues, we can only look forward to small patches
of desert brush between homes as opposed to miles of our unique desert that we can all enjoy.
We value the beauty of the preserve and feel strongly it should be maintained.
The Sonoran Preserve is beautiful. Any development should avoid damaging this precious ecosystem. In
addition, traffic on Dove Valley Road and Sonoran Desert Drive is already heavy and the 45 MPH speed limit is
mostly ignored by drivers. I worry that this roadway will not be able to handle the additional traffic from new
Traffic, keep the beautiful desert, water resources
I have lived in this area for over 16 years and am a native Arizonan. The City has done a wonderful job on
Sonoran Desert Drive, in terms of incorporating areas to recreate and enjoy the unbelievable desert scenery
within the Sonoran Preserve. I have hiked the area and marvel at the beauty. Increasing the planned housing
units by multiples of two or three will significantly detract from the area's beauty and tranquility and add an
unsustainable amount of traffic and introduce ecological damage to the area. There is a reason so much land
was designated as a preserve all those years ago. It should stay that way.
I believe there are multiple reasons for keeping our views for all to enjoy ‐ to preserve the desert and the
animals ‐ so we can enjoy the solace in this wonderful area by walking, biking, driving or just plain relaxing in the
outdoors. Also driving on this Sonoran stretch of road currently needs more restrictions ‐ such as traffic lights at
all intersections for turning. Much speeding ‐ need to have more monitoring of speed requirements. Adding
more housing is just going to add to a lose of the desert preserve and impossible street/road conditions. When
we built our home here, we were told that there were restrictions to keep our desert preserved.
I love being able to enjoy the beautiful preserve without all the traffic. The preserve is what makes city living do‐
Pavement is forever and we’re losing our natural habitats
I live near this area and use it all of the time. Love it! The area is getting congested already and it’s starting to
ruin this special area/space we have available to us to enjoy nature.
I am signing this petition for multiple reasons ‐ we do not have the proper roadways to support additional
housing units and want to preserve the beauty of the region
We need to preserve the beauty of our natural habitats. There are already plenty of places that are zoned for
building. Please do not let greed ruin our neighborhood.
The Sonoran Preserve is absolutely beautiful and filled with flora and fauna unique to the area. Sonoran
Preserve should remain natural for the benefit of the critters who live there.
Would like this preserved with desert lands as much as possible
I walk the puppies in this area and would be a shame if the sanctuary of this Area was ruining forever. Many
people enjoy the beauty
Preserve the desert hiking areas.
It is very important to retain our natural desert and the Sonoran Preserve.
Preserving the Desert Character Overlay District is essential for sustaining the quality of life in & near the
Sonoran Desert Preseve.
I am very concerned about the additional traffic volume that will be a result of large Verdin community. I am a
triathlete who uses Sonoran Desert Dr. daily for training and with the increased traffic I fear for my safety. In
addition, we moved to this area (85085) for the beauty of the desert. Abandoning the Desert Character Overlay
District will eliminate the protections that were placed to ensure conservation of the ecosystems in the area
while still allowing for some development. The large number of homes the Verdin development company
proposes to squeeze into this area will detract from the wilderness and beauty of the Preserve. Yet, another
area of concern would be the overcrowding of schools in the Deer Valley School district.
Page 1232
The Donoran a preserve is a peaceful area used by many people for hiking, mountain biking and horseback
riding. Adding more houses will increase the number of people using the trails as well as create more traffic in
To adhere to our natural landscape and preserve the area and its wildlife.
The Sonoran Preserve is important to me to have beautiful open desert to see wild life, teach our children how
to respect desert nature and it’s in my backyard. With more cars on the road I fear reckless driving and fires
from through in things out the window.
I live on Dove Valley and the traffic is already horrendous. We also love driving "the back way" when we're
headed to Scottsdale for the scenic route. We would hate to see that go and hate for it to be filled with more
homes than are currently allowed (none would be the perfect amount in my opinion). The schools are already
far too filled for the existing amount of homes and the roads were not built for the amount of traffic that
currently passes through on a daily basis. There are so many reasons to not allow more homes!! We moved up
here to be away from the millions that live in metro and we'd like to keep it that way.
Beauty, Congestion, MTB trails
Please save the desert preserve, this is very important! Thank you
The desert in the Sonoran Desert Preserve is already quite overused by hikers, bikers and equestrian riders. By
increasing the population adjacent to this preserve, not only will it lose its true wilderness experience, but it will
have increased urban pressures placed upon it, threatening its very existence. Additionally, as I live just meters
from Dove Valley Trail and witness the already heavy traffic along this corridor that connects to Sonoran Desert
Drive, any increased volumes in traffic would effectively make it very difficult to exit my community onto Dove
Valley Road where no traffic lights exist.
I moved to North Phoenix because of the untouched natural beauty of the desert that hadn't been devastated
by "progress". Humans need areas of Nature to decompress and renew their spirit, crushed by the rigors of life.
Unfortunately, we lost an area of the Preserve, including the wildlife, to an enclave of large houses. It's
unfortunate that money trumps all. I elect people who rise above lure of the almighty dollar to do what is right
for the Earth and her people. Please honor the intention of The Preserve.
This is so important to protect the natural beauty, wildlife, ecosystems, and quiet quality of life that draws
people to the area and the state in general. Please act to prevent the potentially irreparable damage discarding
these safeguards could cause!
I have lived in this area for 17 yrs. and we are raising our daughters here. My family enjoys the trails and hiking. I
am also a teacher at on of the neighborhood K‐8 schools. Our school is busting at the seams even before all the
new construction being completed. You can't keep overloading the schools and roads to crisis points.
To preserve the preserve!
I mountain bike this area at least twice a week and do not want to see the area changed. It is already crowded
on the weekends
Living by the beautiful Sonoran Mountain Preserve area and Sonoran Desert Drive, allows people to interact
positively with nature and the environment. This is necessary for people’s physical and mental well being,
which we all rediscovered during the pandemic when it was one of the few things people were allowed to do.
The Mountain Preserve allows people to connect with nature and enjoy the peaceful outdoor environment. The
people in the area love the open spaces and serenity that the Sonoran Desert Mountan Preserve provides. They
walk, bike or hike in the neighborhood everyday. If these developers are allowed to over develop this beautiful
area it will be a detriment to the already established neighborhoods by increased population through clustered
housing, traffic, safety, noise levels, over crowded schools, and a host of other issues. This mountain preserve is
vital to the well being and safety of people who chose to live for here for a better quality of life. Please don’t
allow these developers to destroy the Mountain Preserve. Thank you
Bike safety Road overly congested
Natalie Karis
Traffic is already heavy and dangerous for my wife who bikes and myself walking
Page 1233
Safe road for training and being outside.
When we moved to Arizona nearly 7 years ago, we chose the Sonoran Foothills neighborhood because of the
surroundings. We did not want to live in an overdeveloped area in more developed parts of the valley. We enjoy
our trails and open desert and do not want them further disrupted by overriding existing protections.
We need to build green and stop destroying conservation areas. We are at a crossroads and our choices should
be with the thought of future generations in mind. The next generation already has a lot of cleanup to address
ASAP to avoid climate collapse.
I am an avid hiker. I enjoy being able to see nature, plants and animals. We are already taking so much natural
habitat from desert life. Overcrowding the preserve area increases pollution by humans and their machines.
Furthermore, light and noise pollution create additional issues. Please conserve our preserve.
We need to preserve the preserves; that’s why they’re called preserves.
I’m an avid road cyclist and cherish this well‐paved, lightly‐trafficked road with a bike lane.
This is a great place to hike and enjoy the beautiful desert landscape. The city planners and council are ruining
the desert plus there is no thought of water shortage when these zoning changes are made.
My favorite thing to do is head out to the preserve with my husband. It is absolutely breathtaking. Until we
noticed the houses being built. And now you want to do more!!! No, building more houses doesn't add to the
environment it only takes away the beauty and safety of our desert wildlife and plants. At some point we won't
be able to call this area a preserve, we will be calling it a mini mall. Noise, air, and light pollution are what's in
store for us if building continues to expand. When will it stop, when there is no desert remaining? It's very sad
and I hope this idea will be reconsidered immediately.
Urban sprawl is unnecessarily destroying the last of our pristine Sonoran Desert and taking away the homes and
food sources of so many of our unique birds, plants and animals found only here in the world. The roads and
increased traffic to these massive developments are also harming our wildlife. Please stop urban sprawl and
stop these densely‐zoned mass developments that are not consciously designed to assimilate into the desert
environment, but rather harm wildlife, replace natural habitat and increase global warming. It’s essential that
the preserve remains what it was intended to be—development‐free and protected for future generations to
I hike there regularly. Open spaces are important and our beautiful desert is becoming too full of dense housing
I ride my bike up and down the parkway with countless other cyclists 3‐4 times per week.
As local residents, my family loves to hike at the Apache wash trailhead and the trails behind Sonoran
foothills/Fireside. My family’s Christmas pictures have been taken in the surrounding desert for years. All the
surrounding neighbors have the desert overlay, which is more important than ever with the water shortage in
Phoenix. If you plant the appropriate trees, cactus etc., NO WATER IRRIGATION is needed. Our trees were
watered deep for the first two years, then turned off. 15 years after NO WATER, beautiful and thriving. You have
my address, drive on by. PLEASE keep the beautiful desert overlay our Sonoran Preserve deserves.
I enjoy hiking at various times of the year on the trails in the Sonoran Preserve. I’ve seen an owls nest, lots of
birds, turtles, and cactus of all kinds in all stages of bloom. There is presently no noise pollution and the area is
pristine. I want it to remain as such for future generations to come, not just in my lifetime.
Preserve‐ should be just that preserve. Preserve the natural Sonoran desert as much as possible. This
development would not only take away so much of our desert beauty but also the wildlife habitats & wildlife
would be greatly affected.
Beautiful desert! Everything doesn’t need to be destroyed and built up
Page 1234
Not only do I enjoy the scenic view along Sonoran Desert Drive, but I strongly believe our future to continue to
live in Phoenix depends on limiting new developments the number one reason being our limited water supply.
We are already in water crisis. How can we continue to develop and build and be able to meet our water needs.
This is scary for already established residents. How will my home value be impacted if there is no water? My
second concern for this development is how it will impact my home value. With increase in traffic, and
development of additional major roads right by my house obstructing views and increasing noise levels, my
home value will most likely be negatively impacted. My house backs up to the beautiful desert and as homes
continue to be built in the desert, our view continues to diminish. Lastly, so many animals that live in the
Sonoran desert will be displaced. With so many developments currently taking place in this area, the animals
have no where to go. We are destroying our habitats, which will further contribute to climate change,
continuing droughts, increasing fires making this location less desirable to live.
The beautiful hiking biking and walking trails!! What they are proposing is way too many homes for in the
middle of the preserve!!
I am concerned about the increase in traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley roads. I would like to see
this portion of the desert remain protected.
I use the area weekly running and hiking. It is a beautiful diverse area with wildlife and plant life. Also concerning
is water shortages. The area needs to be preserved.
I live near this area and enjoy hiking the mountain preserve. I also enjoy diving through Sonoran dessert drive
to see the beautiful landscape our state has to offer without having to drive so far away. Please don’t take this
I love in the north valley and frequent the Sonoran preserve. Limiting building saves the aethetics of the
preserve and limits traffic.
I enjoy the beautiful views of the desert every time I drive on Sonoran Desert Drive. I do not want this land to be
taken away from animal species and used to build even more houses.
I use our hiking and biking trails daily and the added housing has added massive amounts of traffic and it’s
extremely dangerous for pedestrians and bikers not to mention the natural beauty and quiet of our desert is
being destroyed. There are way too many apartment complexes and houses being built up here. Its getting way
too crowded and congested and the litter is also getting out of control. Thank you for organizing this petition!
1. There has been poor oversight with planning roadways to keep up with the existing development in the
Sonoran area. 2. Sonoran Desert Drive is supposed to be a scenic drive and is utilized by many cyclists and has a
gorgeous walking path. The increase win traffic will be a further danger to cyclists and pedestrians. 3. Many of
us have to keep moving further and further out of the city to get away from all the Phoenix traffic and live in a
peaceful community. The existing planning with the “water project” has been a nightmare with construction and
took 8 months to complete. We already have problems with adequate water in our area and other areas of
Phoenix area under water restrictions. Where is all the water going to come from to support all of these houses.
5. Schools are already overcrowded and there is already a problem with staffing for school buses and teachers.
How are we going to support an increase of additional kids and families when we cannot support the ones
already living here adequately?
Too much housing buildout, need to slow down a little
This stretch of road is the safest and most beautiful stretches of uninterrupted roads for cycling in the valley.
Please save it
I am for protecting as much land as possible and conserving water.
Keep the desert the desert and keeping it natural where I bike and hike
I will not vote for an elected official that allows this to happen
We need to preserve the beauty of the desert.
We have enough housing in our area. Please keep the land open so that families can continue to enjoy our
Sonoran Preserve.
Page 1235
I have children and grandchildren, outside the gates, it's TOTALLY UNSAFE TO RIDE BICKES, TRAFFIC IS
ABSOLUTELY 💯 INSANE WHATTTT IF IT WERE YOUR NEIGHBOR HOOD? Thank you
We moved here to be next to open desert and away from valley traffic. Increasing to the proposed
developmentm will eliminate both of these coveted features!
Quality of Life will be destroyed! Let us start with habitat destruction. Then let's discuss the water shortage.
September 2021, it was reported that the Bureau of Reclamation has declared a water shortage on the Colorado
River, which means that Arizona, along with Nevada and Mexico, will get less water than normal by 2022. If we
continue to destroy our desert with unnecessary development for the sake of the almighty dollar then we might
as well lift all restrictions. When will it end? When is enough growth enough? Maricopa County was the number
one county in the nation for growth in the past year. This needs to stop! We are destroying our human habitat
by allowing these developers to bully their way into these areas. Now let's discuss safety? Look at our Police
Dept or lack thereof. We can't sustain this ridiculous growth. Please do what you can to help preserve our
beautiful Sonoran Preserve!
This is a safe place to bike and hike. The balloons are beautiful to watch there. Let’s keep the open space
Already getting too crowded in the area. And the desert preserve is in jeopardy.
I use the area all the time for hike, bike and great out doors
Standards are acceptable as they are set. I have many safety concerns through that Corridor. This is purely profit
over planned and locals paying the price.
I know that growth in our area needs to happen but it shouldn’t be so much that it take away from the Preserve
and the reasons we moved here.
I live in Sonoran Gate. I hike Apache Trail.
We enjoy hiking, biking, and taking beautiful nature photos! Please don’t pollute our beautiful desert with more
needless building!
The beauty and sanctity of Sonoran preserve and the surrounding area is vital to our wildlife and maintaining
there habitats is crucial to these animals that are being continually uprooted by builders and developers greed.
Traffic is already increasing on Sonoran dessert drive and frankly adding more homes will make it more
dangerous for people trying to enjoy the beauty nature is already providing us. We cannot keep destroying
Arizona’s natural beauty just to pad the pockets of a few and bring in more people to an already overpopulated
area, where policing these areas is challenging already for our stretched to the limit police force. Stop building
and start enjoying the beauty that our Sonoran preserve is providing us.
We have so many current issues with water, traffic, maintaining the Desert habitat and nature. Each night we
have dozens of javelinas emptying garbage cans and in the yards in the surrounding neighborhoods. When more
dense housing takes place the displacement of animals and wildlife will cause more problems for existing
Phoenix residents. Thank you for not adding more units. It’s irresponsible.
Sonora Desert Drive is a highlight of living in the area, and provides a safe place to walk and bike near the
preserve. For those of us who live along the road, this is a matter of peace and safety, but for our wildlife, this is
a matter of survival. Allowing the Verdin development company to increase the number of planned housing
units would increase noise and traffic, endangering cyclists in the bicycle lane and make it unnecessarily
dangerous for the wildlife of the Sonoran Desert Preserve to cross the road.
The drive through the preserve is truly a beautiful drive. With more houses comes more traffic which will take
away from the beauty and wildlife of the preserve. It is called a preserve for a reason.
The beauty of this Preserve area should be PRESERVED. There is a reason why the DCOD exists.
Page 1236
The natural landscape of the Sonoran Desert must be preserved so that all may enjoy its true beauty and the
rewards of living in the desert. It takes courage and decisive action to prioritize the natural land over
development yet it is a gift you provide to countless generations. Protecting the preserve is action toward a
meaningful legacy. Please honor the desert preserve and say no to more development in this rare and special
area of Phoenix. With hope and gratitude, Krystal Mazzola Wood
We moved here for the a handful of reasons, one of them was the beauty of the state. But that seems to keep
getting chipped away, literally.
We only get one chance to maintain the character of our community. Once altered, there is no going back.
What comes after houses? Walmart, McDonald's, Circle K. Build on the west side of I‐17!
I bought the house for privacy and quietness. The sound from the cars already are a issue, the amount of
roadkill is brutal and water shortages have began. Taylor morrison has so many issues with the houses in
Sonoran gate , they are not prepared for this project. Pollution and traffic is just not right in this area. Why
wouldn't they build on the area on cave creek road. It's open, houses have no issues. This seems the state is
taking money to push this project through. Who's paying for the roads and why would you put a road up by the
state hiking trails. This ruins the landscape !
I live in the area. I don’t want to see any further development in the Sonoran desert preserve area. I ride my
bike through there and drive through there frequently. I have already noticed how dangerous it is for bicyclist
and that road is becoming extremely congested. Adding a new development will only make matters worse.
We are loosing preserve land left and right. We need to keep the preserve the way it is. Plus not to mention all
the traffic and extra water for all these new builds.
My main hiking spot, beautiful views, would think u are out in the wilderness
Less people in the area
Resource impact and cyclist safety
Keeping the integrity of the preserve intact while allowing current hiking, biking, and traffic levels to remain the
Keep the desert!!! One of the reasons why I love where I live is the Sonoran preserve!!!!
Deserts are fragile environments/ecosystems and overcrowded land use will create problems that will take
generations to correct. Native species need to have their environment protected.
This is a safe route for cyclists as it has little traffic. More and more cyclists are getting hit by motorists all across
Arizona and this is one of the only place cyclists feel safe. It’s also one of the only roads in Phoenix where you
can see the beauty of the desert.
I spend a great deal of time hiking and biking there. The north valley is quickly being developed and it would be
nice to at least have this area remain what it was intended to be…a preserve. Thank you
This area is already over populated..the increase in housing will put a tremendous strain on our wildlife and
surrounding areas
The additional housing adds too much traffic for safely using the bike lanes and takes away the hiking and biking
trails that all surrounding neighborhoods use currently. Move housing to the west side of the I‐17 where
commercial land is being used and not recreationally used like the Sonoran Preserve. The fact that the area is
already called a preserve is reason enough not to build on it.
The scenery is beautiful along Sonoran Desert Drive and to see sections of it being developed for housing
projects will take away from the beauty that we have all come to love about this area.
We use the preserve for hiking and horseback riding. Heavy traffic volume can create a hazard for horses, even
at a distance.
Need to preserve the Sonoran desert. Too many greedy developers that don’t care since they probably don’t
live here.
Page 1237
We need to stop doing things for the sake of the bottom line. We have destroyed enough of our natural
environment for the sake of exploitation, and disregarding something that has been set in place creates a
precedent for this to continue arbitrarily. People move their families to areas like this because of the
environment around them. If we wanted to live in the middle of the city, we would live in the middle of the city.
Allowing this to continue will greatly reduce and diminish the purpose & meaning of preserved & protected
land, as well as the ability by which we are able to enjoy it in it’s natural form ‐ mitigating the full purpose
We have been enjoying the Sonoran Preserve and Sonoran Desert Drive for many years. We go hiking as a
family and with my daughter's school all the time. The drive is so peaceful and beautiful. We were so
disappointed when some houses were built there and now more are planned. I urge you to stop this from
happening and keep the serenity of this special preserve. Thank you.
As a resident of a nearby community I am concerned that the traffic that will be generated by the proposed
Verdin community will present many safety concerns. The Preserve provides a tranquil environment that will
most likely change dramatically in character if this densely populated community is built. I don’t mind some
building along the route but only if it is not populated as densely as some of the surrounding developments.
Traffic along Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley is already becoming a major problem. Increased traffic will
make for a dangerous situation for cyclists riding in the bike lanes. Also, the increased density of homes directly
against the road will affect the desert nature of the area.
I Treasure living where there’s hiking, biking and a beautiful drive that gives you serenity. We are slowly losing
North Valley preserves that are affordable to live around. I understand development is going to happen but we
need to restrict and preserve what we all move to the desert for. The beautiful Desert landscaping and
creatures that inhabit it are slowly being stripped away. An example of our desert being stripped away look at
the Legacy Park that was supposed to have been built and now all is left is an empty shell and eyesore to the
community. It has displaced options for the hot air balloons to land. Desert safeguards are put in place for a
reason why are we taking this away??
Please preserve the natural beauty of the Sonoran Desert. It is irreplaceable!! The proposed excessive
development will permanently destroy the beauty of this desert!!
It’s a gorgeous area that exemplifies the desert…and it’s close to the valley. Developing this area is a sad
mistake that we should learn that open spaces need preserved
Traffic and it will ruin the beauty of the area. This is corporate greed
We need to limit desert impact & traffic in the area as it’s already getting congested.
We moved to this area specifically to enjoy the natural beauty of the desert Hiking, biking, and walking is an
important part of the north valley lifestyle Please do not allow developers to ruin it with dense urban housing
Beautiful area! No need to add more housing to the natural landscape. Money isn’t everything.
This land is our closest access to nature. It is where I hike. It is where I take my children to visit the great horned
owl nest. This land is theirs—not to be traded in a land swap where a few people get rich at the expense of our
nature preserve.
I live in the Sonoran desert preserve. Since 2007
I would like to preserve what we have in our area and community!!
The Preserve is meant to be just that——preserved. Excess traffic, construction and increased carbon footprint
will endanger the flora and fauna of our beautiful desert. Please protect it!
We need to preserve the open spaces that attract so many to the area for recreation. There is a lot of building
of high occupancy units and housing underway. Schools are already at capacity, new services are being built on
Jomax to ease the influx, road infrastructure needs to be in consideration to.
Keep the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve desert beautiful with no construction expansion‐ there’s plenty of
other areas to build houses, etc.
Page 1238
I ride and run at the Sonoran Preserve/Sonoran Desert Drive almost weekly. I’ve even stopped on my way
home before to run. This area is extremely beautiful and has the best bikes lanes I’ve seen. I feel safe there
and don’t mind driving the 30‐40min to get there because of how safe I feel riding on the roads there. If you
take that away from me/us where can we go to feel safe riding? Or running? Or mountain biking? Or hiking?
The beauty alone makes you feel far from the city. If you build you take away that beauty. You need to look at
it from a different point of view. Do you know who is out there? The ASU triathlon team trains out there.
Other groups do time trials up there. Take the time to go and experience it and see why we go. I can go up
there by myself, feel very safe yet not be by myself. I can’t say that about other areas. Don’t take this from me!
Desert preservation. Water conservation
As a native of AZ, north Phoenix particularly, I’ve seen the increase in population boom over the last 20 years.
The traffic, noise, crowds are destroying the natural beauty and peacefulness of N Phx. Also… the water! Where
will all the water come from to sustain such a population? We don’t want to end up like Anthem!!
Arizona is growing too rapidly for its own good. The demand for water is only going to increase with these
unnecessary expansions. Destroying the natural habitats of the wildlife that surrounds is also harmful to the
already damaged ecosystem. There is no necessity to continue to tear up the desert to accommodate an exodus
of out of state buyers. They can find a more sustainable environment to live, Arizona is already overly populated
and adding excessive traffic flow to an underdeveloped part of the city is asinine. Keep Arizona wild.
I prefer an environment that is a balance between housing and open land
The Sonoran Preserve is beautiful Natural landscape that keeps the heat down vs concrete, provides
opportunities for walking, hiking, biking ect. Many of the residents in this area including myself moved up here
due to these walking and hiking trails. Also, the traffic on Sonoran Desert drive is already bad and adding more
homes will only make it worse. Please listen to the residents and save the Sonoran Preserve.
Preserving open spaces is becoming more and more important as they are being lost at a alarming rate.
Increasing housing density is damaging with increased traffic, pollution and water usage.
There is no landscape in the United States like our beautiful Arizona deserts. It is critical that they be protected
as well as the wildlife in them!
I've lived on the north side of town my entire life and thr natural desert is why I continue to live away from the
noisy city. The Sonoran preserve has protection in place to conserve the natural environment and this
development is threatening that protection for the sake of the American dollar. We live up here for the wide
open space, peace and quiet, uninterrupted views and opportunity to enjoy nature. The traffic that's started to
grow is threatening this with speeders flying by at 70+MPH, endangering bikers, walkers and nature. Please do
now allow for more development than this preserve can handle and do not threaten the natural ecosystem by
Destroying the beauty and traffic concerns.
I ride my bike religiously on Sonoran Drive and bike safety for our cyclist should be a main concern and priority.
Our family enjoys the wildlife and open beauty that the preserve provides very much.
Natural beauty along with reduced noise, traffic and night lights.
Would cause an overpopulated area that is meant to be preserved for nature. Would ruin hiking and biking do
to the amount of traffic and would become dangerous. Would effect the views and the ability for people enjoy
the scenery. Would also effect the wildlife pushing the coyotes and javelinas into residential areas. Which they
belong in the desert.
The Sonoran Preserve area requires a much more thoughtful approach to any new development considerations
in order to preserve its character and value to all Phoenicians.
it's a natural treasure that is special and needs to be protected.
I want to keep it as is so that we all can enjoy the area and keep the daily traffic down.
Page 1239
As a former 12 year resident of the Desert Canyon subdivision (32nd / Beardsley) I have supported the efforts of
SOS‐P since the rezoning signs went up. I find it deeply ironic and fundamentally offensive that the first ask of
the developer is to set aside law and planning already in place that ensures what they only pretend to espouse
(“ environmental commitment to raising the bar for protecting and preserving the desert environment”).
The drive along Sonoran Desert Drive is very relaxing and calming. I enjoy hiking and I would like it to remain a
desert oasis to enjoy.
Environmental protection of natural areas/habitats, reduce water demand, reduce pollution and traffic
congestion in this area.
We have 2 parks there, we need to connect these parks. People live here for the openness of the land. We need
more open spaces, not more house's.
We moved to this area because of the preserve, and while we support growth, the aspects of the preserve that
can be protected, should be. It is our responsibility to growth responsively!
It is vital to preserve true nature of Sonoran Preserve and it’s wilderness. We can not abandon Desert Charter
Overlay District.Too many housing will vastly destroy this natural habitat.
We moved here to not be so close to continued urbanization. We utilize the preserves regularly for hiking,
biking, and running.
Concerned about traffic increase and noise. We built our home in 2009 in Fireside at Norterra and have already
seen significant increase in road noise and accidents
I bought 20 years in area specifically for the landscape and to be outside the city. We have so many accidents
and fatalities due the EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC. We can’t handle the i flux of cars students business. Phoenix not
supporting all the builds! What makes this area so desired is the preserve!!!
This zoning would be uncharacteristic of the Sonoran preserve and city park surrounding the site.
ABSOLUTELY NOT FOR DOUBLE or TRIPLING HOUSING UNITS for the safety of joggers and bikers, increased
pollution, decreased wildlife, increased noise, and decreased overall beauty of this amazing area we all cherish
and wish to continue to cherish.
We need to have open space to enjoy hikes, trails, horizon visibility. We do not want the Preserve to turn into a
asphalt map.
I often bike on Sonoran Parkway, hike or run from Apache Trailhead. Having this section of town remain
undeveloped allows us an option close to home where we can escape our hectic lives from living in the big city
ant truly enjoy nature's unaltered beauty.
Multiple reasons. Increase of homes will cause 1.) Traffic Congestion 2) increase in air pollution and unhealthy
ozone levels 3) we need hiking and biking trails for physical and mental health. More and more people are
participating in outdoor activities since the pandemic. 4) Phx ( and most of AZ has a severe water shortage and
the outlook for improvement in future is dismal)
Too much housing buildout, let's slow it down
I love where I live and the traffic is manageable. The mountains and hiking trails are beautiful and right now
there’s congestion when I hike with bicyclists and hikers. More people would make hiking and the outdoors
troublesome for parking and just hiking the trails.
The traffic currently traveling on Sonora Desert Dr is already at a dangerous amount. Not specifically due to
frequency or number of users, but due primarily to their speed on the roadway. The current speed limit is
45mph, but traffic regularly travels in excess of 60mph. This in combination with the vulnerable users of the
road and the addition of a significant amount of vehicles is a disaster in the making for the roadway as it is now.
I would hate to see our beautiful desert drive spoiled by more houses. The Taylor Morrison subdivision was bad
enough. The road WAS a quiet area, great for hiking and biking, away from all the congestion. An oasis in the
desert. I live near there and it was such a peaceful drive, but now there is a lot more traffic on it and no one
does the speed limit. Building more houses will turn that beautiful drive into another freeway! Please don’t let
Page 1240
I don’t want the desert destroyed to more homes. There are plenty of housing developments already going up
around us near I‐17 and the 303. Leave the beautiful preserve out of it please
Preserving more of the natural landscape is important. The Apache wash recreation area is a beautiful way to
experience nature and enjoy the area. More homes bring more cars and traffic and noise pollution, disturbing
the natural habitat. There are so few places left to enjoy nature and leave it beautiful. We don’t need more
homes there.
The Sonoran preserve is a natural heritage that should not be jeopardized in our beautiful state. Preserving our
natural resources is vital in maintaining our environment as well as maintaining tourism . It is a shame that our
government is allowing this to Happen.
I want to continue enjoying walking and biking along the Sonora Desert preserve in a pleasant and safe way.
Concerns over traffic congestion, safety, encroachment on the desert and wildlife.
To destroy nature in order to build more homes is wrong. We are speaking for all the animals that currently call
the Sonoran Preserve home.
When we moved from Wisconsin we specifically picked the Sonoran Desert Preserve area because it was so
beautiful and peaceful. Please do not ruin it by putting up homes there. It is a protected preserve for a reason ‐‐
to keep it natural.
I hike the preserve almost every day, year round. Exponential increases in large commercial trucks and
unforced city and state (ARS 28‐955) traffic laws related to excessive noise ruin the wild experience of North
Phoenix' best attraction. When the city pushed Dove Valley Road through the desert 10 years ago, I was a
member of the Sonoran Citizens Improvement Association. At Phoenix City Council meetings I brought up the
noise issue and stated that the city will never enforce the noise statutes on the books, because the police were
over worked and had more important issues ton deal with. An that was 10 years ago before the defend the
police movement decimated law enforcement moral. 10 years ago, City Council told me not to worry, noise
issues would be addressed. I knew it wasn't true a decade ago. And I have sadly been proven right. The city
needs to finish the Sonoran Desert Drive extension off the 303 as per MAG and the city's (so far) empty
promises from a decade ago. I have a long memory. And I vote. https://sonorancitizens.wordpress.com/
The entire N Phoenix area cannot accommodate this influx of new homes without increasing law enforcement
and fixing the road grid. The city needs to be proactive, not reactive.
The preservation of the Desert Character Overlay District is essential to the area, as to limit growth problems
such as increased traffic and desert destruction.
The Sonoran Preserve is a special and somewhat rare piece of Phoenix. It provides beautiful trails and vistas for
all Phoenicians within the city limits. As the city continues to grow I believe we need to preserve these few
natural spaces for all to enjoy.
We moved to Fireside Norterra area for the Sonoran Preserve‐ great trails, and the beauty of the preserve.
North Phoenix is slowly being robbed of its great asset the Sonoran Preserve and overrun by apartment
buildings, traffic congestion and no respect for the great natural beauty in the preserve.
I am concerned with the number of people packed into a small space. Not only would this increase traffic to an
unmanageable level but will ruin the desert in this area.
We love walking, & biking sonoran desert drive. It's nice to be active in that pristine desert. Please keep the
DCOD safeguards active
Desert overlay is in place to protect the area from over development. We use the preserve multiple times a
week as a family and more cars and will make it ever more difficult to access the amenities from our
We live in this area for its natural beauty and we do not want to lose that.
Page 1241
The Sonoran preserve is a spot where I hike, bike and run 5‐6 times per week. I truly enjoy the beautiful natural
preserve this area has. The animals I see during my adventures is also priceless. I truly hope this petition
makes a change !
Concerned about excessive housing & associated traffic density causing problems & congestion. Please do not
override Desert character Overlay District guidelines
We love the beauty and tranquility of the desert.
I moved to this area because it's next to nature areas. Building in this area will encroach on the preserve.
I love hiking and biking the road and preserve. This is a great N Valley treasure!!
This area needs to be preserved as originally designed in order for the members of this community to enjoy a
place to get away from all the over development.
We have already encroached & displaced our very important desert wildlife, my hope is to prevent further
destruction of our desert ecosystem. I enjoy hiking, less pollution, nature and safety within our preserve. Please
keep it that way.
We are in a huge water shortage all over the country and building in our preserves just takes more resources
that we all need to survive!
Why destroy a beautiful, well loved, piece of land when we already have too many houses.
Too many homes encroach on water supply, room for our native animals, will need road expansion which takes
awake from our desert, will increase risk to bikers and others who visit the area to enjoy the beauty.
It is important to me to keep our beautiful desert open and the way nature intended it to be. We are the desert
southwest and everyone should be able to enjoy the beautiful scenery. It does not do anything or anyone any
good to fill it with homes and commercial properties that would only increase traffic, smog, trash and unwanted
things. Our desert animals need their home and do not need to be pushed out due to unwanted construction.
Preserving natural areas and wildlife
Please! We must protect our desert land. For the animals, the plantation, the beauty.
I moved here in 2007 to be near this great preserve and to live I. A quiet community. Adding this much housing
developments will forever impact this natural environment
We need to keep as much of the natural habitat in this area as possible for the enjoyment of all residents and
I hike on the trails of the Sonoran Preserve many times a week, enjoying the beauty of the untouched desert. It
would diminish the quality of the experience by adding more and more housing developments to the view.
Overcrowding is harmful to animals and to people. There are already too many car accidents due to the current
road infrastructure doesn’t support the number of people in this area. Therefore, more growth in this area will
lead to higher traffic volumes and increased car accidents. Thank you for this opportunity to voice my concern.
Greg Laursen
Tjhis is the last strip of Sonoran Desert left in Phoenix. I'm sorrythe preserve doesn't border Dove Valley. Whats
done is gone do not make it worse by 3X the number of people
The Phoenix metro area is quickly consuming our natural wildlife. The Sonoran preserve and areas around the
preserve are blessings to those near them. An escape from the overgrowth of population.
1) safety of those running, biking, and walking. 2). Nature is truly the reason we moved to this area and it is
vital we protect the preserve from being overly developed and disturbing the wildlife in our area more than it
already has been.
Ignoring the guidance set forth by the desert character overlay district would irreparable harm wildlife habitat
and the wilderness essence of the preserve. Additionally, the increased traffic will add more congestion and
safety issues to an already taxed road system, further reducing the usability for recreational activities.
I would like to preserve the wildlife. Also, the road was not built to accommodate that much traffic.
I love to hike the trails with my dog and my family. It is often the only exercise my aging parents get.
Page 1242
Living in Desert Vistas subdivision since it's existence 15yrs ago has been an absolute blessing and we expect to
keep it that way. With that, we enjoy hiking, biking and walking frequently all year around. Over time the
"preserve" area has seen a HUGE increase in vehicles, accidents, speeding, crime, pollution & noise to name just
a few. Our understanding has always been that no further housing/development of any kind would continue
past our subdivision into the Sonoran Preserve. That certainly did not happen. Sonoran Desert Drive is so busy
NOW that adding additional housing will not only threaten people but the natural terrain and wildlife habitat.
That's a resounding NO WAY!
As a resident here, we need to preserve our natural habitat. You need to think about building more schools
before taking over the desert preserve and destroying the ecosystem just so you can make some builders happy
through these deals. If we can't preserve our "Preserve", then what is even the point?
There are many other places to develop. None of those areas are as “Arizona Natural” as the Sonoran Desert
area. Preserve this area for people to enjoy not trash with developments.
The Sonoran Desert Preseve is a beautiful desert area with amazing trails and gorgeous desert. This is an area
full of wildlife. A space that wildlife calls home. So much development has already overrun nature and driven
wildlife out to other areas. We need to the save what desert we can. I grew up in Cave Creek and the growth in
the city as well as surrounding areas has created a space I no longer recognize. Please preserve the areas we can
and preserve the quality of the area as well as the quality of life for the wildlife that we are already driving out.
Sonoran Desert Drive & surrounding preserve area can not accommodate traffic volume due to proposed Verdin
development.
I firmly feel that natural areas have to be maintained and protected in order to maintain the beauty and balance
of our communities. Doubling or tripling the traffic on the Sonora Parkway within the areas of the Preserve will
most definitely create safety issues with cycling and walking for all folks wanting to enjoy the beauty of the
Councilman Waring, please continue to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
The reason we moved here was the beauty and tranquility of the desert. We were not aware of the proposed
‘city like’ community Verdin wishes to build.
Traffic is already becoming very busy along Sonoran Desert Drive. Many large trucks are using this now too. We
were told this area was supposed to preserve the Sonoran Desert. Many people use the bike paths and hiking
paths. I feel it would become more dangerous to use these paths with the increase of doubling or tripling traffic
with the increased number of homes they are asking for. Keep the same number of homes it was originally
Keep some of Phoenix beautiful and preserving the desert beauty. The Phoenix police department can not
handle the calls for service right now how will they handle more traffic.
Keeping the natural desert habitat is better for the environment.
I purchased my home in Sonoran Foothills in 2010 primarily because of the desert character overlay and how
the neighborhood blends in with the natural surroundings. I moved to this area because of the desert character
and would like it to stay that way as it expands.
I wish to preserve the Sonara Preserve as it is and prevent the reckless encroachment by developers to rob the
community of this precious resource we all enjoy.
I don't want all of North Phoenix to become covered by housing and businesses, we need to preserve Arizona's
beauty!
Because of the natural beauty and I don't want anymore traffic...it has gotten worse over the last few years.
As a 4th generation native Arizonan, I adore our beautiful desserts and believe we must take great care in
unbridled expansion of urban growth. This project would place a huge strain on the perserve area, parkway,
noise, and environmental elements.
The beauty of living in Phoenix is having the ability to have open spaces for not only the wildlife but also the
citizens to use the land the way it was intended. There are plenty of other places to build and expand without
overcrowding the desert areas.
Page 1243
I live in the Sonoran desert north of Phoenix, Don’t want it destroyed by continuing building. Leave it in it’s
natural state, so we can enjoy the desert for generations please .
We purchased our home in this area largely because of the preserve. The opportunities it provides for hiking
and biking with reduced traffic (which has increased since we moved) were also key factors.
I hike and trail run in the preserve at least five times a week since I live within walking distance to the Vista
trailhead. It is a beautiful and relaxing and meditative time for me believe it should be left as is like, as I
understand the story, the original owner wanted it to stay, which I agree with.
There are limited resources that we can all share and enjoy. The Desert Character Overlay District was
established to allow for growth but also to protect our wonderful desert. We are responsible for the
stewardship of this desert for future generations.
Need to preserve as much of our beautiful mountains as possible
If we keep building, there will be no desert to enjoy for us as humans, but even more crucially, we are displacing
and endangering the species whose habitats were destroy. Give the planet a chance. Let’s not be the reason
I hike in the preserve almost daily, and would like to continue to enjoy the nature and the solitude. There are so
many other areas to build along the I‐17 corridor, so why cause more damage to the beautiful Arizona desert
and the wildlife living there. I used to hike Thunderbird, but that's a couple foothills with development all
around, whereas the Sonoran Preserve is just that ‐ a preserve to protect wildlife and allow people to enjoy
nature. Please don't allow any more development of the land!
I moved here because of the nature. I grew up in the country and this was as close to it as I could get. I love the
nature and the quiet that we all paid premium dollar for as well
Me and my friends use that area to ride our bicycles and hike and just enjoy the desert and it would be
dangerous with it a lot more traffic out that way and it will destroy the beautiful desert environment please do
I have lived in this area for twenty years and it is getting so crowded and overbuilt. We must preserve open
outdoor space for people to enjoy the peace of the desert and recreation areas that are our Arizona treasures
we use it weekly for hiking and dog walking please please don't ruin this!
The Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive must under all circumstances remain intake and undisturbed
There have been to many accidents and deaths.
Area should remain as it is. Area is also over populated with new homes and congestion with traffic.
I understand that growth is inevitable, but we need to be smart about it. There needs to be a balance of large
homes, apartments, and smaller homes. There have been hundreds of apartment spaces built west of this area
and the increase in traffic has been considerable in the past 5 years. I urge the council to consider keeping this
balance on the north end of the city.
I drive that way home from work most days and also hike in that area.
I am an avid mountain and road cyclist in THIS area, especially! I also hike and run in the preserve. Safe to say I
am absolutely for the preservation of the Sonoran Preserve. I live in an area very near where a housing
development is under way and the amount of houses being built will be over double what was originally zoned.
Please let those that run the show consider the longer (negative) lasting impacts of high‐density development to
what we have all found profoundly beautiful and desiring of this area; the Sonoran Desert!
This would forever destroy the natural landscape and open the door to even more urban sprawl. Please vote NO
Page 1244
Being surrounded by the Sonoran Desert Preserve is probably the biggest reason that we built the house that
we live in now. It is just so beautiful to be able to drive home after a long day's work and enjoy God's creation at
it's finest. It is truly breathtaking and spectacular. Many people flock to Apache Wash Trailhead recreational
area to enjoy this beautiful natural setting through hiking and mountain biking. It would be a travesty to
overpopulate this area and ruin the enjoyment of the preserve for generations to come. It just wouldn't be the
same. Not to mention the destruction of the natural habitat of so many desert creatures that make the preserve
their home. I witness this first hand while living in the Sonoran Gate Community. These animals do not deserve
to be displaced and have their homes destroyed. The line has to be drawn somewhere in order to maintain a
level of natural beauty in our urban areas. This seems like as good a time as any to make a conscious decision to
halt the human encroachment on the habitat of all of God's innocent creatures and keep this little slice of
This area was set aside to preserve nature and all her beauty. yes the land is very valuable but so is central park
in New York. Preserve means exactly that PRESERVE
We love going to the preserve as a family, and having another major development project will only bring more
traffic, noise, and wildlife displacement. We need to do better and protect our wildlife and say no to money
Preserving the preserve ‐ wildlife Traffic and then needed retail to support the development Overdevelopment
of this area
Please leave the reserve as is, for the sake and beauty of our neighborhood and for the well‐being of the
As a local real estate agent, I understand the need for more housing in the metro area. But there are many
other locations that are not in the middle of a preserve. Outdoor recreation and the beauty of the Sonoran
Desert are reasons why people relocate to the area or purchase vacation homes. Having the preserve remain a
preserve and not another housing project is vital to our community.
I use the preserve at least 3 times a week for fitness. Mountain biking, hiking, and trail running. Wildlife
encounters are always beautiful and their habitat must be preserved. The human population density in this area
is already getting to be more than what it can sustain.
The Sonoran Preserve was one of the most important reasons we purchased a house in this area. To continually
chip away at this wonderful area would be so detrimental to the wildlife that live there as well as the wonderful
hiking trails that allow people to get out and experience nature at its finest. I am strongly against ruining
anymore of the Preserve.
My family and I enjoy this land and don’t want to see this over crowded We use this nature and Beautiful
preserve in north Phoenix area.
I see SOME development as good. Let others enjoy the beauty we have set aside in this area. Increasing the
density of homes is merely corporate profit seeking. Original density plans were thoughtfully put in place to
protect these areas.
Have you seen how beautiful this portion of metro‐ Phoenix is. We absolutely do not need more and more and
more. We have enough people streaming into our state already, no need to encourage more.
As someone who regularly drives, hikes, and bikes this area, it’s important to me, my family, my community,
and Phoenix at large to protect these kind of “open/brown/green spaces”. There are plenty of places around
Phoenix for development ‐ the Sonoran Preserve should not be one of them.
The beauty and quiet of the desert and the Mountain views are priceless. This is why I live in Arizona. The clean
air and the wild life are amazing. The wilderness of the preserve needs to be maintained.
Use that area to bike the trails. Want to keep the space natural beauty not filled with homes.
I love the desert landscape, and enjoy hiking on my time off work. I see the amount of buildings that are being
constructed and the traffic it is creating. Please do not destroy the little bit of desert that exists in this large city,
the habitat of our beloved desert animals.
Page 1245
The reason why I'm signing this petition. We are over developing because we have all these people moving from
other states . We are destroying our beautiful desert to please all these greedy business people to put more
money in their pockets.
I enjoy the hiking and the views
Original safeguards put in place by longtime developers who created the Preserve and associated housing
(Sunbelt Construction). They balanced the housing needs with need to create liveable areas that honored the
fragile desert. This request for increased density is about money and is unnecessary for a profitable develoment
effort. Everyone needs to get paid for their work, including developers, but respect for the fragile ecosystem
and desired lifestyle in the north valley is also required. Profits are fine and were factored into the original deal.
Aaron Cushner
My friends and family and their pets walk there every day! Also it’s called a PRESERVE!!! Preserve it!
It’s a beautiful area to walk or hike or bike and it’s the last area I know of that is close to me. Otherwise I’d have
to drive over 40 minutes to find a preserve that is wild and natural
We need to keep the open land and what makes our area great.
I live directly adjacent to the open desert by the Sonoran Desert Preserve, just off Sonoran Desert Parkway. We
regularly see wildlife, and hear coyotes on a nightly basis. This is a fragile and important ecosystem, and is a
hallmark of the beauty of Arizona’s natural desert landscape. If it disappears, it will destroy this magnificent
aspect of what makes Arizona such a great place to live. For my family, the day the bulldozers show up to tear
down the majestic Saguaro’s to make room for concrete & asphalt, is the day we sell and move away.
This drive is very vital for bikers and the natural trails and parks the residents across the city come to enjoy. The
new development across the dedicated Sonoran landscape is going to spoil everything and increase the safety
concerns on the biking corridor. This corridor is used by Olympic gold medal winners , Tour de France
I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for 15 years. I do not want to see my beautiful natural desert destroyed. I like
living in a quiet and not so busy area of town. I would be devastated if Sonoran desert drive turns into another
freeway right next to my house. I specifically moved in this area to get away from the noise and traffic. The
natural wildlife here will also be destroyed which part of the character of this area.
Concerned about too much growth and traffic. Moved up here in 2005 for the beautiful open Sonoran Desert.
Absolutely do not want to see that all developed ‐ we do not need anymore housing or apartments.
The growth in this area is already at an all time high. This small area of desert PRESERVE is why many of us
moved to the area. The PRESERVE is used by hikers and bikers as a beautiful getaway that is in our backyard.
Every other inch has already been developed by apartment complexes. Enough!! Leave our PRESERVE alone!!
It is a beautiful area that has many trails for hiking, biking, geo caching and just getting away from the hustle of
the Valley. It is already limited in access and putting more homes will just congest that. It is also ruining the
animals natural habitat to continually uproot them for a dollar.
I live next to this area and have seen how developments have led to negative effects to the desert. A substantial
increase of houses will amplify this cause irreversible damage to the area.
I have been running and riding out in this preserve for nearly a decade. As I start to see more developing, it
becomes less safe to be active out there.
Increased traffic would make the area around the preserve much more unsafe. We enjoy walking around the
preserve with our children, as well as hiking on the trails. Please do not lift the restrictions on building in this
beautiful area.
Everywhere near Sonoran preserve and desert drive constructions are happening, it’s a very beautiful hike place
to enjoy quality time with family and friends, as a neighborhood resident I would like to keep it beautiful and
not have homes after homes getting built there… there are hardly any community park getting built in the area..
We need to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
Page 1246
This is a beautiful and vibrant part of our community. Don’t destroy it by adding additional residential
development. Once those houses get in there, they are going to be complaining and advocating for commercial
development because they don’t want to drive 20 minutes to shops and restaurants. Before we know it, all of
the preserve will be gone. The hiking trails, the nature, and the area is pristine.
I live in Sonoran Gate. Moved here to be by my sons. One lives in Sonoran Gate also (6 houses away). We
moved here for the beauty and serenity of the desert preserve. Our hope was to continue to grow our family
and ensure our next generation will also have the opportunity to enjoy the beauty of this area. Hot air Balloons
and bike riders every morning. It’s a place of beauty, calmness and peace. Please do not destroy this gift. Thank
My family enjoys the protected preserve and allows us to partake in outdoor activities near home, safely with
our tons of traffic. The noise and light pollution will affect the natural wildlife around. Most importantly the
infrastructure can not support the proposed project.
I am concerned about the exponential traffic increase on the only road in and out of this area with only a single
lane in each direction for a majority of total distance. I remember pre‐Covid that the intersection at Cave Creek
and Sonoran Desert Drive would back up a mile deep during morning rush hour, waiting for people to turn
either left or right. What will happen when the traffic significantly increases? Plus there is only one way in and
one way out of this area. It seems irresponsible to deliberately increase traffic this much without a major
infrastructure change BEFORE the bulldozers come!
I love nature and wanna do my part to preserve the nature where I live. Please control the growth around the
Sonoran Preserve.
This pristine desert area should not be developed, it needs to be PROTECTED.
I enjoy the tranquil drive along Sonoran drive and being able to bike along the road without too much traffic.
The hiking is second to none. I would hate for it to turn into just another neighborhood with traffic and crime
I love hiking in the preserve. Anyone who intends on building anywhere close to it needs to follow the rules.
Our desert is at risk. We need you to protect it by requiring the builder to do the right thing.
Development needs to factor in impact on water and other resources. Water in particular, is a finite resource!
Quality of life is one of the overriding factors in why we chose to live here. The natural beauty of this area will
be severely impacted by further development as will our quality of life. Please put Arizona first!
I love driving on the Sonora Desert Dr. and seeing our beautiful desert. I and my family members also enjoy
hiking and biking on the trails.
Would love to keep this scenic drive the way it is. Scenic.
Traffic concerns and safety for cyclists along SDD.
The Sonoran Preserve is vital to our ecosystem. Without it, the natural biome will be destroyed and the quality
of life for all living things (including the humans) will be degraded, possibly beyond repair. Environmental impact
studies show that further encroachment and development will make the area unsustainable for a thriving
community and eventually, totally unlivable.
The Sonoran Desert Drive is a beautiful natural area that needs to be preserved for future generations. There
are plenty of other places to develop closer to the I‐17
I moved here for the beauty around me offered by the preserve. over the past 5 years I have seen that beauty
disappearing as more and more developments have sprung up without any regard to preservation. It’s
disgusting! Please do something about it and don’t buy into the greed of the land developers.
This road is a quick north valley traffic bypass that remains somewhat traffic free for now. There is great hiking
and desert views. For profit expansion in this area would destroy that.
We live in the area, have hiked these trails, our two boys attended nearby CCUSD Horseshoe Trails elementary
school, and I’d say that in general we have a strong desire to act as good stewards of this land and therefore
have a vested interest in maintaining the beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and our balance with nature.
Its such a beautiful area it would just ruin the look.
Biological and cultural resources
Page 1247
We moved further out of town to enjoy the natural desert beauty and to be away from traffic congestion,
expanding building does the opposite of that.
This is a wonderful area that provides so much to so many people in regards to beauty, quiet, exercise, nature. It
would be a shame to lose all this secondary to over development.
I want to preserve our current area and I bike 6 days a week in what I already consider dangerous traffic to get
to the preserve and ride the path!
The extra traffic flow will affect all the wild life amongst many other reasons.
We are homeowners in Tatum Highlands and use the beautiful Sonoran Desert Drive to get to one of our
favorite hiking areas, Apache Wash Trail. It is vitally important both ecologically and aesthetically to maintain
the Desert Overlay Plan to keep this remarkable Arizona treasure intact with low density, one story, blended
into the environment, natural colors, and with great respect of the surrounding preserve. The developer’s
existing project just to the west on Sonoran Desert Drive is an example of the opposite of this‐ homes close
together, no subtle and natural build character, no boundaries between homes, no blending with the Sonoran
Desert landscape. Sticks out while on the drive or hiking the Preserve rather than disappearing/tastefully
blending in. This is very concerning and must not be duplicated in any way. Please retain the existing Desert
Overlay Plan to maintain the incredible Sonoran Preserve. Thank you Councilman Waring and all city council
members. Respectfully submitted, Laurie Foster
Keeping some semblance of the desert lifestyle is why we moved here. Do not ignore the safeguards. Reduce
the number of housing units. Why do you want to do business with a company which clearly does not respect
nature, but only the economic bottom line ‐$
I travel Sonoran Desert Drive every day because I live right off of it. It is a beautiful drive, but also one that is
very serene and peaceful. I am concerned that allowing the Verdin community to be built at the requested
density it will cause a great impact and stress to the drive through the Preserve. Even if the road is expanded to
more lanes, this road will become a dangerous route for the bikers and hikers in the area, not to mention the
drivers. Please do not allow the density for this new community as requested!
Mark Dotterer
Keep population down to preserve the wildlife
Too much traffic already
My family lives in Sonoran Foothills. We chose this beautiful area because of the gorgeous desert preserve. We
love our out of the way pocket and want to protect the gorgeous pristine desert from further development.
Arizona is destroying so much of the natural land that people moved here for. I don’t want more traffic. It’s
awful as it is. Water is at emergency levels and more homes will only tax the water levels more.
Sonoran Desert drive is the only place I feel safe riding my bicycle in such a busy, congested area. I am full of
anxiety from traffic until I make that turn onto SDD. It is integral to our vibrant cycling community which is so
important to the Valley culture. What’s more is the preserve allows for one of the only true unobstructed views
of our beautiful AZ desert in the busy Valley area.
There is already too much traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive and a community as proposed with no other access
will increase congestion making things less safe. In addition, it will jeopardize the tranquility of the nearby
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, especially the Apache Wash Trail.
It is a very peaceful place to hike. My family goes there frequently. The beauty of Sonoran Desert Dr is so
beautiful it should not be disturbed.
I run and cycle on the parkway and traffic is already dangerous, especially near the passing zones. I also hike
extensively and if many more houses are built, the views will become less spectacular than they are now. In
addition, wildlife would be affected by overdevelopment
Beautiful natural area that provides some of the best riding, running, hiking, and viewing in the greater Phoenix
area. It would be a tragedy to not preserve this wonderful natural area.
Page 1248
Wide open space without traffic & housing congestion, w/o water & schooling requirements is vital to this area
of the Sonoran Preserve.
We are losing our open spaces at a rapid rate all in the name of money. We need to preserve these open spaces
for our future children to enjoy and for the natural animals and plants that were here before us. The increased
traffic and housing will deteriorate the quality of life for all (humans, animals and plants alike). The increased
concrete/pavement will ultimately increase the heat retention which has a detrimental effect on water, wildlife
and plant life. Do not ignore the Desert Character Overlay District.
This area is important to us as we hike and bike. Knowing that preserve will always be here made buying our
home easy. We would like for all development to mind and take care of our desert spaces. There is a reason
the Desert Character Overlay District was created. To ignore this would be a tragedy.
Too much growth and congestion. Lack of conservation to desert land and outdoor activities.
We moved up to this area to enjoy the beauty and tranquility of the area. Now it is being threatened. We
moved up to this area to see our beautiful dessert in its natural habit, and now it's being threatened. We moved
up here because it was a great dream come true, and now that dream is again being threatened by those
wishing to make many dollars off the land and environment that belongs to us all. Please, please let's stop this
travesty. Thanks for reading my input. We just so love it up here and hope for no more growth and
There are so many communities being built simply for the benefit and profit of the builders that little attention
is given to the people who actually want to have both, a beautiful home in a beautiful well thought out
community where the desert we live in is represented and not just the interest of the builders bottom line. Do
the right thing for a change.
I go hiking there to appreciate the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert and the breathtaking views of the
McDowell Mountains and Boulders of Carefree etc.One if the last pristine places to go up here in the N Valley .I
do not want more housing subdivisions and apartment buildings obstructing the views along with more traffic
congestion coming from the constant relentless overbuilding of housing presently occurring .Please save this
beautiful,natural corridor which is used for hiking and biking along with the equestrian trails for horseback
riding.Please allow local residents a sacred piece of land to cherish for us now as well as the generations to
come ,we need somewhere to go that we can take pride in .The Natural beauty of our desert lands is what drew
me to the area 42 years ago please Preserve it!!
It is a beautiful preserve that holds opportunity to connect with nature, and allow us all in the valley to have
natural habitat for wildlife and flora and fauna that are so important to keeping the integrity of our great state.
Sonoran Desert Drive is a crucial recreational corridor for cyclists and other vulnerable road users. It is an
increasingly rare thoroughfare that contains a bike lane, has little to moderate car traffic, has a low enough
speed limit which increase cyclists safety, and is uninterrupted by many traffic lights and stop signs. These
factors make it a beautiful place to recreate and provide a safe(r) place for cyclists to explore and enjoy the
beauty of the Sonoran Desert. The Sonoran Preserve provides similarly valuable recreation space for hikers,
mountain bikers, and other trail users. While further development of this area may provide financial benefits to
the city in the short term, the loss of natural land and recreational space will far out weigh these benefits over a
longer timeline. Further development will further increase the strain on water, further contribute to the urban
heat island effect, and decrease the happiness and mental benefits associated with outdoor activity and being in
natural landscapes. More low density, car oriented development is not the answer to the challenges that face
I hike and bike in the preserve and love listening and seeing all the blooms, wild animals and quietness the
desert has to offer. Please quit the over building that is going on! Preserve our water resources!!
We need to preserve the natural beauty of Arizona and stop over development.
With all the apartments being built on the west end between Dove Valley & Sonoran Desert Drive, the traffic
will become just like the city streets—noisy and congested. Verdin proposing additional homes will make it that
much worse. In addition, we moved to this area because of the Sonoron Desert Preserve which is becoming non
Page 1249
the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards were put in place to keep this specific and unique area from
overdevelopment and should not be overturned due to developer greed.
Vital ecosystems are threatened by too much expansion and development.
I support maintaining the desert overlay requirements for the Sonoran preserve. We need to maintain a healthy
balance between nature and development and not allow these safeguards to be discarded for development of
any current or future projects.
The natural beauty and desert landscape is home to so much wildlife and is also enjoyed year round by current
adventure and outdoor advocates
The preserve needs to be left in tact. The uptick in traffic will be detrimental to people trying to enjoy
biking/walking & enjoying nature. The shear numbers in volume in people in driving on Sonoran Parkway if this
plan is approved is very alarming.
I live here and traffic is already getting too much! We moved here 10 years ago to be out in the desert!!! I hike
on the trails at least twice a week! Please keep more desert!
Too much traffic. Dangerous to have additional traffic where lots of bikers use the bike path. Why not build on
the other side of 17 instead of near the preserve. Help of wildlife not be pushed out even more.
Our desert is part of our lifestyle's. Many of us hike and enjoy our desert landscape. The area is not built for
even 400+ homes, with an average of 2 vehicles per home. Our local school system doesn’t support the vast
amount of new developments going up currently. It’s will also decrease night visibility of the sky in the evening
for those who use telescopes. It will also increase area emissions, pollution visibility, and area temperature.
The Sonoran preserve is just that, a Preserve. It preserves many species of plants and wildlife that is indigenous
to the area. It is vitally important that we preserve this area for our children and their children.
Living in the area I regularly hike and bike in the preserve with my family and do not want to see it get overrun
with more housing developments. Additionally Dove Valley is already very congested, I want to preserve our
desert, Phoenix in general has a water issue, and most importantly the schools in this area are already over
Abundance of traffic and congestion
Please preserve the beautiful desert.
It is imperative we save our Sonoran Desert. There is not a viable reason a developer should be able to double
or triple the amount of homes and City Council should not allow it. The developer does not care about quality of
life or preserving our precious desert, they only care about how much profit they can make. This is a time for
our City Council to stand up for the best interest of the residents of Phoenix and not give in to the desire of a
developer. The proposed development goes against the preservation of our desert, increase traffic, take away
hiking, biking trails and general quality of life for the residents.
With all the planned development in the area, I have a major concern about the infrastructure, and even
planned expansion, being able to support the additional housing in the preserve. Part of the appeal of our area
is the desert beauty, so additionally, overturning district safeguards not only damages the natural environment,
but risks all those that already live/work in this community.
Please do not increase the level of traffic on sonoran desert parkway. The additional cars will increase risk to
current commuters and cyclists.
To preserve the desert for all to enjoy hiking, biking, and the beauty.
Preservation of our land is critical. While I accept development that has been approved, businesses need to
consider the impact to the surrounding area and growth for the sake of growth is not an acceptable plan.
Concerned about traffic, School crowding, and preserving the desert. They need to keep the desert safe guards
in place.
Page 1250
The Sonoran desert preserve is the one of last the undeveloped areas in Phoenix. The abundant wildlife and
topography is one of the many reasons we love Arizona and want to save flit for generations to come. We
access the preserve nearly daily for hiking and for enjoying the outdoors. We urge you to to preserve this
natural area and reject the request to remove the desert overlay in the upcoming Verdin project.
The desert is slowly vanishing which breaks my heart. The Sonoran Preserve should be as it is titled “PRESERVE
Preserving our land for wildlife, beautification and the earth needs to be heard! Enough has been taken over by
businesses and HOA builders. This needs to stop!
Too many houses are taking the little land left we have to see and enjoy the animals and desert habitat life. We
need our nature, we need our desert life. Protect it!
We have overpopulated the North Phoenix area already with many dense residencies, namely apartment
complexes and townhomes. I believe we need to slow down and consider expansion in a different direction so
that we don't lose many of our beautiful mountain and nature parcels that we need to save. I feel this is being
rushed and has not been thoroughly reviewed and vetted.
We moved here from Wisconsin almost 4 years ago. 100% the reason we selected to live up here in the North
valley was because of the Sonoran preserve. We chose to not be inside the 101 on purpose.please don't allow
the Sonoran desert drive and beautiful desert around it to be taken over with cars and traffic.
Sonoran Desert Drive is one of the few places in The Valley that is great for cycling. The grid nature of the PHX
metro area has largely left road cycling and bike lanes as an afterthought, but SDD seems to be an oasis‐like
exception‐ truly a world class stretch of road that has already begun to change due to the development on the
west side. It would be tragic if this preserve was to fill in any more than it already is‐ preserve some of what
We have a young family and love to hike which is why we moved to this area. If we don’t stop this, it will
destroy the area and wildlife.
Too many people and too much traffic is bad for the environment and the people living in the area, like me.
Traffic will likely significantly increase staying within the growth guidelines, so ignoring the guidelines and
increasing the number of dwellings in the area beyond the guidelines will make traffic and life even worse.
I don’t want to see that beautiful desert area ruined with homes intruding. It was already upsetting to see that
area being ruined by the developers greed for money. I say “NO” to the developers!!
I believe honoring the meaning of the preserve is of utmost importance.
I feel that they are over building in Phoenix. Have limited water supply. The traffic is already congested and
difficult to around.
There would be too much traffic and it will ruin the beauty of this area of the desert. There are enough
developments in the area and we need to keep these areas open.
It’s the only road up north not yet ruined by the constant construction (traffic, houses, etc) happening up North
and still the only place where active people (cyclists, runners, etc) can ride/run safely and enjoy a piece of the
desert without housing and buildings ruined the view
Amount of traffic it will bring on a street that is only 2 lanes. Also the reason the street is unique designed for
the preservation of the beauty and for enjoyment for cyclists hikers and walking paths
My family hikes and mountain bikes several times per week on these trails. We truly appreciate this land and
would not want its inhabitants to be disrupted any further than they already are.
The Sonoran Preserve is a promise to keep our beautiful desert pristine. Encroachment of more homes breaks
that promise. The delicate balance of between humans and wildlife is already teetering in the wrong direction.
Let’s save some beauty for future generations.
I am so tired of seeing buildings upon buildings being built in areas that are natural to Arizona. Let’s just stop
this now. It’s getting out of control and species natural habitat needs to stay in place.
I have lived here for 10 years and watched the beauty of the desert being destroyed with development. The
plants, animals and the majestic beauty of the desert is ruined by the continued development until there is no
desert left. It is very sad.
Page 1251
Need Preserve, otherwise we will lose out on the beautiful scenery and have way to much congestion.
Please help us preserve this beautiful natural resource. So often “progress” (AKA Greed) ends up destroying one
precious landscape after another… We greatly value our current way of life. Some of us have made a great many
sacrifices in order to live here. Speaking as a disabled Veteran, I specifically sought out my current home, which
at the moment affords peace, beauty, and a decided lack of city noise. Don’t let a massive influx of absent‐
minded tourists and irresponsible over‐development destroy this paradise. Thank you ‐ Dr. Eric Biscoglio
I chose to live in this community because I wanted to be closer to nature and enjoy the desert preserve.
We do not want the sonoran preserve to be destroyed just to build some additional homes. The traffic is already
a major problem and there is not enough infrastructure and businesses around here to support all these homes.
It's a Beautiful area for our community. Hiding companies should stay within how the area is zoned
We need to protect these lands and stop paving over the natural beauty of this Preserve. There is a reason it is
called a Preserve. Let’s preserve it and the abundant plants and wildlife that call it home!
It’s critically important to protect the preserve and maintain the natural beauty of the area. This is why so many
of us moved here. It’s already not safe to leave the neighborhood with people speeding and limited visibility of
the rolling road. Added traffic would make routine activities no longer enjoyable.
The valley is continually growing and cycling collisions, injuries, and fatalities seem to be increasing, or at least
they are ongoing. I, and many others in the cycling community, feel more at danger than ever before. There are
few places we can go and enjoy long, uninterrupted stretches of road, and still feel relatively safe. Sonoran
Parkway is a frequent choice for us and we enjoy it year‐round. Please preserve this area from development.
We chose this part of Phoenix when we moved from out of state because of the open desert and what that
offered, little traffic, and less people in general. In just 4 short years we are seeing things change for the
negative…reminding us of overdevelopment we experienced in the East San Francisco Bay Area.
Overdevelopment that led to traffic issues and overcrowded schools, just to name a couple problems. We don’t
want to see these same mistakes take place in our new home. And we don’t want to lose the beautiful open
I have lung issues from cycling alongside traffic for so many years and I was struck by a car ladt year while riding!
Having a gem like this is so important! People can enjoy the desert without the noise, pollution, and safety
issues that come with increased traffic. Please, let's keep a little bit of Arizona wild + scenic.
We live along the Sonoran Preserve. We bought here because it was a quiet peaceful area to raise kids and
explore nature. Please don’t allow more homes to destroy this area of nature. It will ruin the bike trail and
hiking trails and cause a lot more traffic in the area.
Ruin of preserve / increased traffic volume
I moved to this area because I love the open spaces.
I walk the desert everyday it is vital to keep it preserved . Arizona is in danger , water shortage , wildlife please
keep preserve
We love to hike this beautiful area. Also the drive down Sonoran parkway is incredible. We must preserve this
desert not only for human enjoyment but also the wildlife that call it home
The Sonoran Preserve needs to be saved, it provides recreation like walking, hiking and biking. Also, it keeps the
heat down. Adding more homes will only create more traffic. One of the reasons we moved to this area is due
to this Sonoran Preserve.
I want to protect the wilderness and essence of the preserve. I thought this land was protected from future
housing development
This would cause pollution dust noise and would be harmful to our health
Climate change
We hike and drive through here for mental health. Please don’t fill more desert preserves with homes and
commercial property.
I’m concerned that continued development will destroy the beauty of our Sonoran desert. It will bring increased
pollution and traffic to the area.
Page 1252
I love exploring and hiking this area with my family.
I am a city of Phoenix park steward for the far north valley preserves including Apache Wash and Dixie
Mountain. I patrol these trails for hiker safety several times of month. The beauty and open desert landscape of
the Sonoran area is a prime reason why people move to this area or visit it to hike or bike. Please do not add
higher density housing and destroy the open land we currently enjoy.
It’s nature. Beautiful parts of the valley have already been ruined by housing projects. This shouldn’t be another
This has been a place for bikers, hikers, walkers, to enjoy and be able to still see arizonas beauty. We do not
need more development in every area. This road every weekend houses hundreds of athletes, outdoors people,
and scenic drivers all alike. Coming up to this stretch of road to enjoy what they love to do be outside away from
the city noise and traffic and be one with the Arizona desert. There is plenty of other great land to develop on
but this road has history and will continue to be a place people want to feel safe and connect to nature on.
Please don’t take that from Arizonans.
Page 1253
Racelle Escolar
From: Henschel Rich
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 5:15 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Comments for May 5th Planning Meeting Agenda items 5 and 8
Hello. My name is Rich Henschel and I live in the Sonoran Gate subdivision off of 7th Street and Dove Valley Road. My
concerns regarding the Taylor Morrison Verdin proposal are primarily centered around the roadway infrastructure that is
currently in place and what is planned in the immediate future.
As you know there is only a single lane of traffic in each direction for a significant portion of the roadway between North
Paloma Parkway and Cave Creek Road. You may not be aware of this, but just a couple years ago before Covid, the
morning rush hour east-bound traffic would back up at least a mile at the intersection of Cave Creek Road and Sonoran
Desert Drive with people needing to go either north or south on Cave Creek Road. Since many people have changed
their work habits during Covid, this hasn't been a big problem the last year or two. However, more and more people are
going back into work and there is already a new subdivision being built out by Pulte and Lennar homes at Dove Valley
Road and North Paloma Parkway. This will certainly add additional eastbound traffic. Now with this Verdin proposal the
traffic will increase significantly with 1200 - 1400 new homes.
The second concern I have relates to the fact there there is only one roadway which services my subdivision as well as
the new proposed Verdin subdivision. You may not be aware of this but a few years ago there was a fire in the Sonoran
desert and Sonoran Desert Drive was closed just west of Cave Creek Road for 2 - 3 weeks. The only way to get to my
home from Cave Creek Road was to drive north to Carefree highway, west until 27th Avenue, south until Dove Valley
Road and then come in from the west. This was a significant detour and added at least 15 minutes to my travel
time. What if this happened again? How would this affect Police and Fire response times? What if a house was on fire
or someone was having a heart attack? That additional 15 minutes could be the difference between life and death.
I realize there is a proposal to expand the roadway with 2 lanes of traffic in each direction with a median in the
middle. However, I have no confirmation from the City of Phoenix on when that will actually become a reality. I've simply
heard that traffic patterns will be reviewed and actions will be taken at the appropriate time. Unfortunately that doesn't
give me a lot of confidence. Frankly I think we already have an exposure and to begin building such a huge subdivision
before addressing this exposure is irresponsible.
Please understand that I am not against land development in general. My father was a land developer and I understand
the importance of offering various housing alternatives, especially in this current housing shortage. But I urge the city
planners to reject this development proposal until these roadway infrastructure exposures can be closely studied and
properly addressed.
Thank you.
Rich
Page11254
Racelle Escolar
From: C Severance
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 10:20 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Desert overlay and Taylor Morris
Good evening.
I am writing to you as a concerned citizen of the Sonoran Foothills neighborhood. I am 100% opposed to the shrinking of
the desert overlay for the convenience of home builders like Taylor Morris. The builders' primary concern is for
increased revenue, which comes at the expense of our beautiful desert and the animals that call it home. Please protect
our wildlife. Please protect our beautiful landscape. Please protect our preserve.
Thank you.
Christine Severance
Page11255
Racelle Escolar
From: Mead Summer, REALTOR, CRS
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 11:08 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Case #Z-6-22-2 and GPA-DSTV-1-22-2
Attachments: planning commission.docx
Dear Racelle and Planning Commission members:
Attached is my letter in opposition to Case #Z‐6‐22‐2 and GPA‐DSTV‐22‐2 in their current form. To be clear, I
am not against construction of new homes entirely. However, the presentation made on behalf of DR Horton
failed to disclose numerous issues, and the chairman of the Desert View Village Planning Commission showed
obvious bias toward the builder and against concerned citizens.
Please share this letter with the members of the Planning Commission, I am willing to make time to meet with
any Planning Commission members in person or by phone or computer if they would like to discuss the merits
and concerns about this project.
Sincerely,
Mead Summer, REALTOR, CRS, AHWD
Vice President, Pinnacle at Desert Peak Homeowners Association
Associate Broker, West USA Realty
Certified Residential Specialist (CRS)
Maricopa County Real Estate Special Commissioner
Member, Arizona REALTORS Professional Standards Committee
Licensed Real Estate Continuing Education (CE) instructor
Phone: 480/747‐7255
Email: mead@superiorAZhomes.com
Web: www.superiorAZhomes.com [superiorazhomes.com]
Page11256
pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov
Dear Commission Members:
In light of the misinformation provided by DR Horton representatives and the clear bias shown by the
chairman of the Desert View Village Planning Committee (DVVPC), I wish to bring to light numerous
issues regarding DR Horton’s rezoning application for an area of over 400 acres west of Cave Creek Road
and south of Jomax Road (case #GPA‐DSTV‐1‐22‐2 and companion case Z‐6‐22‐2).
As a resident of Desert View since 2007, a sitting HOA board member and a Realtor who does
substantial business within the Desert View area, I fully understand the need for more housing.
However, DR Horton presented numerous fallacies in its presentation. Some seemingly received only lip
service from the planning committee, others were ignored altogether. Even when residents raised the
issues, the chairman of the committee disputed residents’ claims and, in one case, ridiculed an older
resident because the resident inadvertently referred to Pinnacle High School as “Pinnacle Peak High
School.”
The Stone Butte East development proposed by DR Horton is slated to consist of 1,145 single‐family
homes, a 260‐unit apartment community consisting of two‐ and three‐story buildings, and a 140‐unit
community of single‐family casitas that are planned as rental units. The issues that I take with the
proposed plans primarily concern the traffic that the proposed 1,500+ homes would bring, as well as the
height of the apartment community.
The traffic issue that must be considered related to the level of traffic on Cave Creek Road. Cave Creek
Road has five lanes between the 101 and Jomax Road ‐‐ two northbound lanes and three southbound
lanes. During the DR Horton presentation, the DR Horton representative claimed that the builder’s
traffic study showed that “75 percent of the traffic produced by this community will be going south.”
This comment went unexplained by DR Horton and unquestioned by DVVPC members, but concerned
residents picked up what board members apparently missed.
To be more specific than the DR Horton representative, the traffic study showed, likely accurately, that
most of the people who would live in this community would be more likely to travel south toward the
101 rather than north toward Cave Creek proper. What seems obvious, but what no committee
member ever noted, was that all the people who would go south in the morning on the way to work
would later travel north from the 101 to the new community on their way home. The two northbound
lanes of Cave Creek Road north of the 101 already are overburdened; northbound traffic waiting for the
traffic light at Deer Valley Road already extends halfway to Rose Garden Lane during rush hour. The
addition of 1500 new homes without widening northbound Cave Creek Road to three lanes would turn
this area into a daily crucible for northbound drivers, and DR Horton made clear that widening
northbound Cave creek Road would not be the responsibility of the builder.
Page 1257
My other concern is the height of the apartments. In 2017/2018, DR Horton approached the City about
building a three‐story apartment community at the intersection of Cave Creek and Pinnacle Peak roads.
At the time, I and other concerned residents pointed out, first to the DVVPC and then to the Phoenix
Planning Commission, that all residential communities along and near the Cave Creek Road corridor
north of the 101 were no more than two stories. We argued that a three‐story community would
change the character of the surrounding community – which (somewhat ironically) also was built by DR
Horton. Although the DVPCC ignored residents’ concerns, the Planning Commission voted to limit the
apartment community to two stories and the City Council followed the advice of Planning Commission.
Now, DR Horton again seeks to build a three‐story community that would affect the character of
communities that were built by, yes, DR Horton. Those include Desert Peak and The Pinnacle at Desert
Peak, whose residents fought against three‐story buildings in 2017/2018, as well as the new Stone Butte
community, which DR Horton built over the past two years.
On behalf of my neighbors and fellow DR Horton home owners, I ask that you strongly consider the issue
of northbound traffic from the 101 to the subject area when deciding whether to approve the planned
rezoning and a construction project of such magnitude. I also ask that, at the very least, you restrict the
apartment community to no more than two levels, following the reasoning of the Planning Commission
and the City Council in 2017/2018.
Please know that I am available to discuss this issue with you in person, by phone, or by computer.
Sincerely,
Mead Summer
Vice President, Pinnacle at Desert Peak HOA
Associate Broker, West USA Realty
480/747‐7255
mead@superiorazhomes.com
Page 1258
Racelle Escolar
From: Diana Duran
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 2:12 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject: Sonoran Preserve
Hello,
I am against changing the Desert Character Overlay on Sonoran Desert Drive. The Sonoran Preserve is very unique and
changing the Desert Character Overlay would damage the flora and fauna that live in the Wash.
I also drive on Sonoran Desert Drive and it is only a two lane road and to add 1,250 homes would add an additional
2,500 cars on that road. There are several subdivisions that would be impacted by the addition of all the cars because
Dove Valley Rd/Sonoran Desert Drive is the only exit and entrance for some of those subdivisions. Also there is a
crosswalk Dove Valley Road that sometimes gets difficult to cross as it is today and to add an additional 2,500 cars will
make it dangerous for walkers and bikers using that crosswalk.
Traffic gets backed up going East on Sonoran Desert Drive and when turning onto Cave Creek Rd one can wait at least 5
minutes to turn in the morning. I’ve seen it backed up by at least 25 cars.
I’m not against the building the homes but let’s make sure that we don’t impact the Sonoran Preserve in an unhealthy
way and allow people to access Apache Wash trailhead safely. The infrastructure is not there to house 1,295 homes and
to allow homes to be built without the proper infrastructure would make it a big headache to old and new homeowners.
Kind Regards,
Diana
Page11259
ATTACHMENT J
From: Christine M Pedersen
To: Julianna Pierre; Joshua Bednarek
Subject: FW: Verdin - Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date: Thursday, May 19, 2022 1:52:08 PM
From: Sonoran Preserve
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 11:30:44 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC
Subject: Verdin - Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Dear Councilman Waring,
Recently, I wrote to you about a mailing that Save Our Sonoran Preserve was doing to gage public
support for retaining the Desert Character Overlay District. The mailing was made to a total
sampling of 3400 of the nearly 12,000 registered voters living near the Preserve in District 2. The
area is highlighted green in the map posted
at: https://app.box.com/s/bnui5b5w5ufyqidem2mmwfg0jofh1c6f [app.box.com].
An aerial showing where our 1100 petition signers are located can be viewed
at: https://i0.wp.com/ceds.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Save-Our-Sonoran-Petition-Signer-
Locations-5-11-2022.jpg?ssl=1 [i0.wp.com]
A 35-page compilation of the reasons provided by 98% of the petition signers is
at: https://ceds.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Reasons-Why-Voters-Want-To-Preserve-the-
Desert-Character-Overlay-District-4-29-2022.pdf [ceds.org]
I am pleased to report to you that the mailing is showing a high degree of deeply felt support for
the Sonoran Preserve among nearby voters, all of which are urging you to maintain the overlay
ordinance.
We would love the opportunity to meet with you again at City Hall to discuss these results and
hopefully work on a solution that your constitutes would find agreeable.
Please reach out to me on how we can schedule a meeting before the June 1st City Council
meeting.
In the meantime, I have listed some helpful links on the survey results below.
Looking forward to speaking with you again soon and thank you for your invested interest in this
development!
-Dr. Gary Kirkilas
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
708-369-4566
Page 1260
Links:
- We mailed the letter at the following link to 3400 registered voters, half of which were
Republican and half Democrat: https://app.box.com/s/3wp1f022c56vu1j566ph0kdcmcbztdh8
[app.box.com].
- The mailing to 3400 voters has thus far generated 1100 signatures of the petition
at: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve [surveymonkey.com].
- A map showing the location where supporters live is
at: https://app.box.com/s/t0am8a0717ksk0o1sdalrgdc19zhlcdk [app.box.com]. As you’ll see
support is coming from voters living up to four miles from the Sonoran Preserve. And support is
about equal from Republicans and Democrats.
- Nearly all of the petition signers provided the reasons for why they want the Sonoran Preserve
safeguards of the Desert Character Overlay District retained. These reasons can be viewed
at: https://app.box.com/s/405n9bnddchkl92qj29j1x1m0yx8xhun [app.box.com].
*******
Page 1261
Page 1262
Page 1263
Reasons Provided By Phoenix Residents for Why They Signed
the Save Our Sonoran Preserve Petition at:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sonorapreserve
We need to do everything we can to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve. There shouldn’t be lots of homes
there. We’ve already taken so much of the natural habitat and developed it. We need to leave large chunks
alone so that those animals that live in the desert have a place. I love having the wilderness nearby and
untouched. Increasing the number of homes near the preserve is asking for trouble and displacing so many of
the desert animals. I bought out here to be close to nature not to bring the downtown traffic here.
I walk and bike at the preserve at least a couple of times a week. It’s beautiful, and quiet. Driving through to
cave creek rd is actually relaxing, I drive that way when I want to stay away from the crowds on the freeways
(17 & 101). It’s a beautiful drive, it’s what living in Az is about, wide open and beautiful to look at. Don’t ruin it
with more houses and traffic congestion.
As a native Arizonan I am saddened to see so much of the natural beauty of our desert being scourged. Driving
anywhere in the valley and nearby areas you are assaulted by the lack of natural beauty. We need to halt urban
scrawl and save the desert for our grandchildren.
I chose to live in this community because I wanted to be closer to nature and enjoy the desert preserve.
The amount of traffic we already have on dove valley is excessive. We do not need to add more.
I use the Sonoran preserve almost daily to get a brief reprieve from the overcrowding of Phoenix. The ability to
briefly enjoy the desert views without seeing endless developments and choking smog of cars is why we decided
to live in this area.
Too much traffic and too many users making heavy environmental impact. The preserve is there for a reason.
any change to Desert Character Overlay will open the door to the entire area being filled in with high density
housing. Forever destroying the natural landscape of the area. Please vote NO.
Safeguarding the Sonoran Desert Preserve values we treasure
The reason we moved here was the beauty and tranquility of the desert. We were not aware of the proposed
‘city like’ community Verdin wishes to build.
Beautiful desert! Everything doesn’t need to be destroyed and built up
The Arizona desert is a truly beauty that nothing else compares to. Large Cati with blooming flowers, mountain
ranges from every aspect, and wildlife that is crucial for our ecosystem; there’s are just a few reasons that make
Arizona great. WE ARE KILLING OUR SONORAN PRESERVE WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION AND HOME
DEVELOPMENTS. We do not want more homes, we want to save our preserve!!!! I want my everyone to be able
to drive down Sonoran desert dr and experience the breathtaking views that I get to see everyday I drive to and
from work. This is truly a special place and we need to keep it that way. Taylor Morrison can go find another
place to destroy if they want to make a quick buck. But I don’t want to see it here
The Sonoran Preserve and the Sonoran Desert Drive represent the last of pristine desert in the city of Phoenix.
Anyone who has visited the Preserve and the Drive will see beautiful views, wildlife, and people using the bike
lanes and hiking trails. To allow a massive development destroy the character overlay will ruin the peaceful
drive and endanger the ecosystem. I also fear that the additional traffic will no doubt create dangerous
conditions for cyclists that regularly train on Sonoran Desert Drive. We live here to appreciate the desert. But
the desert is disappearing in Phoenix. The Sonoran Preserve is a wonderful area of Phoenix and a great place to
escape to from the hustle and bustle of other areas. To grant the rezoning request of a home builder will send
the message that the City of Phoenix cares more about development and not about the constituents who
Need to preserve the Sonoran desert. Too many greedy developers that don’t care since they probably don’t
live here.
Page 1264
The Sonoran preserve is a natural heritage that should not be jeopardized in our beautiful state. Preserving our
natural resources is vital in maintaining our environment as well as maintaining tourism . It is a shame that our
government is allowing this to Happen.
There is already so much danger to bicyclists. Also, just as important, keeping the desert beautiful and allowing
wildlife to thrive in the Sonoran Preserve.
The number of people hiking is increasing but even if is not, the streets are narrow and it is dangerous to drive.
Keep the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve desert beautiful with no construction expansion‐ there’s plenty of
other areas to build houses, etc.
I want to preserve the desert. We have a water shortage not enough water now for the people that live here.
Not enough schools why aren’t the building responsible for building schools for the children?
The unique space is one of the main reasons we built our home in the Gateway region. It has only been open
for a few years and needs to remain a "Preserve" and not stress or encroach on the desert any more than
already has happened.
We have overpopulated the North Phoenix area already with many dense residencies, namely apartment
complexes and townhomes. I believe we need to slow down and consider expansion in a different direction so
that we don't lose many of our beautiful mountain and nature parcels that we need to save. I feel this is being
rushed and has not been thoroughly reviewed and vetted.
This is so important to protect the natural beauty, wildlife, ecosystems, and quiet quality of life that draws
people to the area and the state in general. Please act to prevent the potentially irreparable damage discarding
these safeguards could cause!
Beautiful desert and shouldn’t be changed for housing
Environmental protection of natural areas/habitats, reduce water demand, reduce pollution and traffic
congestion in this area.
We enjoy hiking, biking, and taking beautiful nature photos! Please don’t pollute our beautiful desert with more
needless building!
Enjoying the desert environment is something we need to protect so that we can continue to share it with
Keep some of Phoenix beautiful and preserving the desert beauty. The Phoenix police department can not
handle the calls for service right now how will they handle more traffic.
Traffic and it will ruin the beauty of the area. This is corporate greed
Preserving the preserve ‐ wildlife Traffic and then needed retail to support the development Overdevelopment
of this area
The desert beauty of this area is its most treasured asset
The Desert Character Overlay District was put in place to allow for growth but with measures and safeguards
needed. Ignoring and allowing growth beyond that allowed by the Desert Overlay District in the Sonoran
Preserve area is wrong and will lesson the uniqueness and beauty that we currently have, while also adding
traffic and reducing safety for those that currently enjoy cycling, walking, hiking, etc. along Sonoran and the
preserves. Please do not allow Verdin development to move forward with their plans to exponentially grow this
area and add more homes To the Sonoran Preserve. Thank you.
Please follow the Desert Character Overlay District plan. Keep traffic low and undeveloped land so we can enjoy
the preserve.
Preserving our land for wildlife, beautification and the earth needs to be heard! Enough has been taken over by
businesses and HOA builders. This needs to stop!
The beauty of the desert is disappearing fast! We drive Sonoran desert drive 2‐3 times a week west bound
around sunset. So many people simple stop to take pictures because of the beauty. There is a brief opportunity
to do this because soon houses come into view and obstruct the natural vistas. Home being built today are huge
two story monstrosities, craning this large home together will destroy this beautiful landscape.
Page 1265
I moved here in 2007 to be near this great preserve and to live I. A quiet community. Adding this much housing
developments will forever impact this natural environment
My wife Barbara and I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for nearly nine years. The appeal of this location was and
still is the Sonoran Preserve, a true gift to the residents of Phoenix. Many years ago the overlay district
created a plan for growth balanced with the fragile ecosystem of the preserve. Neglecting this balance
jeopardizes the character which makes this place so special as well as places the preserve at risk. I respectfully
request the Phoenix City Council comply with the overlay and hold Verdin to the established guidelines. After all,
one of the reasons this area appeals to them is they recognize the beauty and appeal of this location to future
as a third generation native zoney, I have seen too much of our beautiful desert turned over to developers. We
must preserve the very asset that draws so many to move to our wonderful state‐ find a better balance
between growth and preservation. I recently moved to a home in Sonoran Foothills to enjoy this beautiful area.
Please do not allow the greed of developers overbuild our desert.
I mountain bike this area at least twice a week and do not want to see the area changed. It is already crowded
on the weekends
When we moved to Arizona nearly 7 years ago, we chose the Sonoran Foothills neighborhood because of the
surroundings. We did not want to live in an overdeveloped area in more developed parts of the valley. We enjoy
our trails and open desert and do not want them further disrupted by overriding existing protections.
Natalie Karis
The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is one of the finest uses of tax payer dollars. The ability to hike and mountain
bike on miles and miles of trails is one of my favorite parts of living in North Phoenix. We are already inundated
with apartment complexes and home developments with plenty of inventory. Plus, there is plenty of land
available for developers to build on that won’t wreck one of the best things that the City of Phoenix has done in
the past couple decades.
Too much housing buildout, need to slow down a little
It is a very peaceful place to hike. My family goes there frequently. The beauty of Sonoran Desert Dr is so
beautiful it should not be disturbed.
I live in the Sonoran desert preserve. Since 2007
Climate change
This area is important to preserve. I regularly use this area for recreation and it is an important reason why I
choose to live in the north valley as opposed to other areas in Phoenix. I DO NOT WANT THE NORTH VALLEY TO
TURN INTO CHANDLER OR GILBERT!!!!
It’s vital to keep the preserve natural and untouched for the use of hiking and supporting outdoor activities.
Without the regulations in place there would be no preserve to use and admire. The animals in the preserve
would be greatly affected by a larger population crowding them.
The amount of traffic increase will greatly harm the ecosystem as well as increased foot traffic in this unique
I've hiked the Apache Trail and adjacent areas through the years while visiting my family in Phoenix. I recently
bought a house in the area and I'm saddened and alarmed that the Phoenix City Council would entertain the
doubling or tripling the number of housing units on the Verdin site. There is a reason why the Desert Character
Overlay District is in existence. I strongly urge the Council to reject the Verdin development company's proposal
to double or triple the number of housing units for the Verdin site.
Destroying desert habitat, overpopulating an area not intended to. Negative effects on property value.
Our desert is beautiful. There won’t be much of it left if it keeps getting built on.
Too many housing developments going up, water, waste and increased traffic issues.
To preserve the beauty and nature of the Sonoran Desert
Page 1266
We are losing our open spaces at a rapid rate all in the name of money. We need to preserve these open spaces
for our future children to enjoy and for the natural animals and plants that were here before us. The increased
traffic and housing will deteriorate the quality of life for all (humans, animals and plants alike). The increased
concrete/pavement will ultimately increase the heat retention which has a detrimental effect on water, wildlife
and plant life. Do not ignore the Desert Character Overlay District.
I drive this road regularly and it’s already getting over populated with traffic with the current development.
More housing and construction will take away the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and will also
increase unwanted traffic.
This would forever destroy the natural landscape and open the door to even more urban sprawl. Please vote NO
No wanting any more home delvelopers tearing up the preserves. With the additional Verizon zone site there
will be to many dangerous EMF’s in the community
There are plenty of other places to build, these this beautiful piece of land beautiful. Keep the traffic down for
those of us who use this area for biking. Oh yes, and where are you getting all the water to support all of this
new construction?!?
I’m concerned that continued development will destroy the beauty of our Sonoran desert. It will bring increased
pollution and traffic to the area.
The reason why I'm signing this petition. We are over developing because we have all these people moving from
other states . We are destroying our beautiful desert to please all these greedy business people to put more
money in their pockets.
I enjoy hiking at various times of the year on the trails in the Sonoran Preserve. I’ve seen an owls nest, lots of
birds, turtles, and cactus of all kinds in all stages of bloom. There is presently no noise pollution and the area is
pristine. I want it to remain as such for future generations to come, not just in my lifetime.
We don't have the infrastructure to support any additional growth. I wish we could halt the issuance of any
further building permits in the state until we can guarantee the people of AZ that we will have adequate water
and energy resources to match projected growth rates. We can NOT have growth outpace supply.
I live directly adjacent to the open desert by the Sonoran Desert Preserve, just off Sonoran Desert Parkway. We
regularly see wildlife, and hear coyotes on a nightly basis. This is a fragile and important ecosystem, and is a
hallmark of the beauty of Arizona’s natural desert landscape. If it disappears, it will destroy this magnificent
aspect of what makes Arizona such a great place to live. For my family, the day the bulldozers show up to tear
down the majestic Saguaro’s to make room for concrete & asphalt, is the day we sell and move away.
I believe honoring the meaning of the preserve is of utmost importance.
1‐ more traffic 2‐displacing wildlife and plants.
Traffic is already overloaded on dove valley road and commitments were made to develop the Sonoran desert
drive. Nothing has happen. Trying to exit my desert enclave neighbor is struggle now, adding more traffic is
negligent. I also moved to the area for the serenity of the preserves and natural habits, all developers in the
area must comply with the desert character overlay.
This area is greatly used for hiking, biking, trail running, and outdoor recreational activities. We do not want
over development to ruin the natural aesthetics, significantly increase noise, or pollution that would degrade
the value of the true remaining wilderness in the Sonoran Desert Preserve. Please seek to enforce and uphold
the Desert Character Overlay District toward the Verdin project and other subsequent proposals.
Our schools are already over capacity and adding yet another high density housing development will adversely
impact the school infrastructure as well as the safety to bikers in Sonoran Boulevard/Dove Valley. Allowing
larger lots and this home sizes will attract more affluent residents and this increase the tax revenues for this
I oppose the Verdin site changing the current Desert Character Overlay District plan. We are already seeing
traffic that is dangerous to our cyclists and pedestrians. Adding additional homes without concern for the traffic
it will bring will greatly make this road even more dangerous.
Page 1267
Preserving the natural beauty of the area is important to current residents. They use this area for healthy
recreation. It also should be saved fir environmental reasons. Don’t add to the sprawl that is already part of
may areas in Phoenix .
We live in a largely unspoiled Area of the city. We chose this location for its natural beauty and remoteness
from the busy‐ness of the city. We enjoy the outdoor activities it has to offer without the noise and pollution we
see elsewhere. Please help preserve this area for future generations to enjoy.
Currently traffic on Dove Valley / Sonoran Desert Drive is heavy during busy hours. With the addition of Verdin
adding 1200 homes could increase traffic by 3 times and with 2 new housing developments currently being built
west of us and the new semiconductor plant being built could increase traffic by 6 times as where it is today.
Plus taking over more of the desert landscape that was originally approved is just being greedy. I am all for
progress and increasing tax base but there must be limits to preserve the beauty of our area.
With all the planned development in the area, I have a major concern about the infrastructure, and even
planned expansion, being able to support the additional housing in the preserve. Part of the appeal of our area
is the desert beauty, so additionally, overturning district safeguards not only damages the natural environment,
but risks all those that already live/work in this community.
The preserve is a sanctuary and feel that this increased volume of homes would create a dangerous high traffic
in an area that is a recreational haven for cyclist, hikers and runners. The impact of these homes will also have a
negative affect on the the wildlife and natural dessert of the area.
My family and I use these trials for recreation purposes. We are also concerned as a community for the traffic as
well as how it will effect the wildlife.
As the builders destroy the land for more houses the animal life get pushed away and in to smaller areas of
open land. Or get caught in or on people's property. Unacceptable to just ignore the standards for there
It’s a gorgeous area that exemplifies the desert…and it’s close to the valley. Developing this area is a sad
mistake that we should learn that open spaces need preserved
Maintain desert preserve, congestion, quality of life, safer place to enjoy desert with exercise.
With the amount of traffic on Sonoran/Dove Valley today, when we pull out of Sonoran Gate Community, it is
taking a chance on your life when needing to turn left. Why would anyone approve more home building to get
more traffic? Also cars ‐ and trucks ‐ are speeding between 55‐70 miles an hour on this stretch. You should
have traffic lights at all intersections for turning traffic. Also, Let's Save Our Desert Views ‐ that's why we built a
We are overbuilding this area. Traffic, water supply, pollution are all contributing factors to limit growth. In
addition, the limited wildlife will be severely impacted
Sonoran desert is such a beautiful drive. Everyone should be able to experience it. Sonoran desert drive is not
meant for a high volumes of traffic and our beautiful Sonoran desert would be ruined with the addition of
housing developments along Sonoran Desert Drive.
We moved here for the a handful of reasons, one of them was the beauty of the state. But that seems to keep
getting chipped away, literally.
It is important to preserve the natural desert landscape and prevent overbuild that will destroy habitats.
Adding additional homes when there is no road infrastructure will add so much traffic. I drive SDD and there are
times when there are more than 25 cars backed up at the intersection of Cave Creek Rd. Also I am concerned
about closing up the wash between SDD because animals need to be able to traverse the entire wash. I am not
against the original number of homes but to increase it to what TM is asking is a lot more homes. The Sonoran
Preserve is very beautiful and I enjoy biking there but it is hard to cross the street with the current amount of
traffic on Dove Valley Rd and the Verdin Project will triple the amount of traffic.
Enjoy bicycling through the preserve. The road is too narrow for the traffic already using the parkway.
I live here and traffic is already getting too much! We moved here 10 years ago to be out in the desert!!! I hike
on the trails at least twice a week! Please keep more desert!
Page 1268
The beauty and quiet of the desert and the Mountain views are priceless. This is why I live in Arizona. The clean
air and the wild life are amazing. The wilderness of the preserve needs to be maintained.
The Sonoran Preserve is absolutely beautiful and filled with flora and fauna unique to the area. Sonoran
Preserve should remain natural for the benefit of the critters who live there.
Beautiful desert scenery and nearby desert recreation like hiking and biking.
It is vitally important that the Sonoran desert preserve is kept safe from over population of the surrounding
areas! The overbuilding of the area will degrade the beautiful that we and future generations need in our lives
to create the balance of city living. It’s critical! Over building followed by extremely high traffic increases will
destroy the preservation of it’s natural beauty. I ask that the members of the Phoenix City Counsel hear our
concerns and uphold the Desert Character Overlay District as it was intended.
The beauty of the desert & also a place for the animals to live. We gave already taken enough of their home.
We need to protect our beautiful desert. There are many other areas to build on so we can all appreciate the
scenery. After all this is why we live here.
Use that area to bike the trails. Want to keep the space natural beauty not filled with homes.
Traffic congestion, pedestrian and bicycle safety. Preserving this area from development, as envisioned by the
Desert Character Overlay District.
The beauty of this Preserve area should be PRESERVED. There is a reason why the DCOD exists.
As a 4th generation native Arizonan, I adore our beautiful desserts and believe we must take great care in
unbridled expansion of urban growth. This project would place a huge strain on the perserve area, parkway,
noise, and environmental elements.
Without a road plan for major increase in traffic and the current drought in AZ, I oppose developments like
Not only do I enjoy the scenic view along Sonoran Desert Drive, but I strongly believe our future to continue to
live in Phoenix depends on limiting new developments the number one reason being our limited water supply.
We are already in water crisis. How can we continue to develop and build and be able to meet our water needs.
This is scary for already established residents. How will my home value be impacted if there is no water? My
second concern for this development is how it will impact my home value. With increase in traffic, and
development of additional major roads right by my house obstructing views and increasing noise levels, my
home value will most likely be negatively impacted. My house backs up to the beautiful desert and as homes
continue to be built in the desert, our view continues to diminish. Lastly, so many animals that live in the
Sonoran desert will be displaced. With so many developments currently taking place in this area, the animals
have no where to go. We are destroying our habitats, which will further contribute to climate change,
continuing droughts, increasing fires making this location less desirable to live.
Natural beauty along with reduced noise, traffic and night lights.
Love the beauty of the area. So peaceful to drive along and see the plants and trees, which would be lost
forever with more housing. Please save this beautiful area for our children and all those who come after them.
I am signing this petition as I care deeply about keeping the Sonoran preserve sacred. It is important to preserve
the existing ecosystems. Additionally, This area is already dangerous with increasing traffic.
The Sonoran Desert is home to many species. It's important for their survival that their habitat isn't cut up by
roads and other development.
I have lived in Sonoran Foothills for 15 years. I do not want to see my beautiful natural desert destroyed. I like
living in a quiet and not so busy area of town. I would be devastated if Sonoran desert drive turns into another
freeway right next to my house. I specifically moved in this area to get away from the noise and traffic. The
natural wildlife here will also be destroyed which part of the character of this area.
Preserve recreation area that is part of and enjoyed by our community. Prevent gross over development which
will destroy the desert community which we call home
Would love to keep this scenic drive the way it is. Scenic.
We value the beauty of the preserve and feel strongly it should be maintained.
Page 1269
I have been hiking at the Sonoran Preserve for years with my son and my dogs. We love the beauty and the
feeling of being in the wilderness just a couple of miles from our house in Valley Vista. I know our area is
experiencing tremendous growth right now but I feel the area on the preserve needs to continue to be
My family and I enjoy this land and don’t want to see this over crowded We use this nature and Beautiful
preserve in north Phoenix area.
It’s critically important to protect the preserve and maintain the natural beauty of the area. This is why so many
of us moved here. It’s already not safe to leave the neighborhood with people speeding and limited visibility of
the rolling road. Added traffic would make routine activities no longer enjoyable.
Great hiking and exploring area.
The Sonoran Preserve is a promise to keep our beautiful desert pristine. Encroachment of more homes breaks
that promise. The delicate balance of between humans and wildlife is already teetering in the wrong direction.
Let’s save some beauty for future generations.
I support maintaining the desert overlay requirements for the Sonoran preserve. We need to maintain a healthy
balance between nature and development and not allow these safeguards to be discarded for development of
any current or future projects.
We moved up to the area because there was space and open land. We don’t want to live where people are on
top of each other and traffic is out of hand. Don’t ruin our beautiful space.
There are so many communities being built simply for the benefit and profit of the builders that little attention
is given to the people who actually want to have both, a beautiful home in a beautiful well thought out
community where the desert we live in is represented and not just the interest of the builders bottom line. Do
the right thing for a change.
I hike and bike in the preserve and love listening and seeing all the blooms, wild animals and quietness the
desert has to offer. Please quit the over building that is going on! Preserve our water resources!!
Preserve the desert hiking areas.
I live near this area and use it all of the time. Love it! The area is getting congested already and it’s starting to
ruin this special area/space we have available to us to enjoy nature.
I want to preserve our current area and I bike 6 days a week in what I already consider dangerous traffic to get
to the preserve and ride the path!
What comes after houses? Walmart, McDonald's, Circle K. Build on the west side of I‐17!
I participate in running and hiking in the area and treasure the natural beauty of the desert landscape.
The Desert Character Overlay was put in place to preserve open spaces and promote responsible development.
Develeopers should not be allowed to bypass rules and guidelines. Please maintain the integrity of Overlay
safeguards for the sake of the future of our community.
We need to protect these lands and stop paving over the natural beauty of this Preserve. There is a reason it is
called a Preserve. Let’s preserve it and the abundant plants and wildlife that call it home!
The speed at which the traffic flows is about 20 over the speed limit and it is a matter of time before a biker is
killed. This is happening currently and with more traffic /homes it will be worse. We don’t have the school
space to support more homes. We moved up north to get away from traffic and now the desert is at risk of
being destroyed by more builds.
I hike thru the preserve almost everyday. It is a beautiful and peaceful area amid the city. Losing this area to
Korea housing would be awful. There is so much development everywhere so these special areas are becoming
all the more important to spare or not over develop. Once it is gone it can not be replaced. Please don't let this
wonderful area be ruined by more over development!
We bought a home in this area in 2009 with the idea that the Sonoran Preserve would remain a Preserve. We
and many of our neighbors enjoy using the walking, hiking and biking trails because of its serenity. Please don't
let the lure of developers'money start chipping away at it. The city invested a lot to create the trails and the
Apache Wash trailhead. Let's preserve the Preserve.
Page 1270
We do not want this new development because we love the natural desert we chose to live near. In addition,
we do need the excessive amount of traffic that such a development would cause.
I live in the area. I don’t want to see any further development in the Sonoran desert preserve area. I ride my
bike through there and drive through there frequently. I have already noticed how dangerous it is for bicyclist
and that road is becoming extremely congested. Adding a new development will only make matters worse.
I’d be like to see less traffic and houses. This a beautiful area, and treasure our Sonoran preserve.
There is no landscape in the United States like our beautiful Arizona deserts. It is critical that they be protected
as well as the wildlife in them!
Want beauty while biking
Myself and so many of my neighbors and friends hike this area on a regular basis! There is a nest that an owl
comes back to every year! There are beautiful fees of the amazing area in which so many of us call home! Please
don’t destroy an area we love and cherish
One of the main reasons we bought our house here in 2018 was because of it’s location in relation to the
Preserve. Already traffic has become a nightmare with the recent developments and removing the Preserve will
only exacerbate an already horrible problem. Also, to quote the great Joanie Mitchell, “you don’t know what
you’ve got til it’s gone.” Losing the Preserve would cause irreparable damage to the environment and the
The Sonoran Preserve along Sonoran Desert Drive allows us close appreciation of the scenic desert and its
thriving ecosystem. Other parts of the valley are better equipped for growth and infill. We need to embrace
density where the city is more prepared to support it. This patchwork sprawl into the outer reaches of the
desert chops up the expanse of habitat unnecessarily. If it continues, we can only look forward to small patches
of desert brush between homes as opposed to miles of our unique desert that we can all enjoy.
Preserve the natural beauty of the AZ desert.
It's a beautiful, natural preserve. It's a generous drive and the hiking and biking trails amid the serene desert are
therapeutic.
The Desert Character Overlay District should be adhered to.
I want to keep the area accessable for recreation.
It is a beautiful drive and I am sad to see they have done any development along this stretch of road. I thought
this was a preserve but it doesn't seem like it lately with all of the signs I have seen go up lately.
After retirement, I moved here from the city specifically to enjoy the Sonora Preserve. To lose the beauty of
The Preserve would be nothing short Of a crime.
I live around the corner in Sonoran Foothills community and one of the reasons we moved here was to be able
to bike on Dove Valley and Sonoran Desert, as we train for Triathlons year round. Every car you add to these
roads makes this more dangerous for us. I have almost been hit twice by cars coming out of Sonoran Gate
community. The proposed development of over 1400 homes will destroy this very special area.
As a resident living at Fireside, I have seen javelinas (up to a dozen at a time) and other wild animals come up to
our home looking for food and emptying garbage at night. By tearing down more natural and wild habitat for
additional homes will only increase the existing problems for the animals in the dessert when more of their
natural habitat is torn down. Stop tearing in to the natural surrounding preserve.
The beauty of the Sonoran Preserve will be replaced with urban area???? During the hike or bike ride are we
supposed to admire the houses???
This area was set aside to preserve nature and all her beauty. yes the land is very valuable but so is central park
in New York. Preserve means exactly that PRESERVE
I live in Sonoran Gate. I hike Apache Trail.
For the animals. We can’t continue to build on their land. They are constantly being pushed out. This earth
cannot sustain all the building
Page 1271
There is no need for additional housing in our area specifically so near a protected preserve. There is not enough
water so support the additional homes and businesses that come with a development such as this.
Jennifer Walter
The Desert Charter Overlay District is in place to protect the Preserve. We are simply asking to maintain
adherence to it. Other than profit, there is no valid reason to break the Charter. If housing shortage is an
argument, then investors should absolutely look to revitalize and invest in existing residential spaces.
We moved to this area to enjoy the beautiful desert landscape that it offers unlike many other Phoenix areas.
To destroy this beauty that offers hiking, biking, and general nature opportunities so close to home would be
devastating for my family, not to mention the traffic that it would bring. Our neighborhood is already being
robbed of its quiet and peace from the houses already built on this road and it’s use as a through street. People
speed through at 50+ miles per hour to the point that it is difficult for me to turn left out of my gate. I can’t
imagine the impact on this traffic should more homes be allowed through the preserve. Let’s keep this beauty
to enjoy. Things like this are disappearing from the Phoenix area. We must save this.
This preserve is important for the community and wildlife!
There are plenty of areas to do future developments we shouldn’t marginalize the beauty of the Sonoran
Sonora Desert Drive is a highlight of living in the area, and provides a safe place to walk and bike near the
preserve. For those of us who live along the road, this is a matter of peace and safety, but for our wildlife, this is
a matter of survival. Allowing the Verdin development company to increase the number of planned housing
units would increase noise and traffic, endangering cyclists in the bicycle lane and make it unnecessarily
dangerous for the wildlife of the Sonoran Desert Preserve to cross the road.
My concern is for public safety first and foremost. In addition to the widening of the Sonoran roadway and the
disregard for the serenity of the desert. Finally I feel the City is growing too fast with little regard for Public
Safety and infrastructure growth.
I frequently recreate in the area ‐ it is frequented by a lot of people. Both on the road with limited traffic and on
the trails. It would be detrimental to the foundation of the Phoenix Preserves to take away land dedicated to
open space and letting developers tear it apart. Developers can get land further out on the outskirts of town to
develop ‐ not areas already dedicated as open space for all to recreate now and future generations.
We live in the Sonoran Gate community. I’m also a cyclist. We moved here to escape congestion and enjoy the
outdoors. All of that is threatened with this current building frenzy. Why would we abandon the express
purpose of these Preserves, so carefully planned and uniquely executed?! And where are we finding a
sustainable water supply for this unbridled development? This is madness.
I live in the vicinity of the preserve. I moved here to be close to nature and removed from the hustle of town. I
have enjoyed having wild animals pass through my backyard, but since all of the building along Sonoran Desert
Drive/Dove Valley began, wildlife sightings near my home have decreased dramatically. We are edging the
native species out of their rightful territory. Please do not butcher the desert any further.
We need to preserve the open spaces that attract so many to the area for recreation. There is a lot of building
of high occupancy units and housing underway. Schools are already at capacity, new services are being built on
Jomax to ease the influx, road infrastructure needs to be in consideration to.
It is very important to retain our natural desert and the Sonoran Preserve.
There would be too much traffic and it will ruin the beauty of this area of the desert. There are enough
developments in the area and we need to keep these areas open.
There are many other places to develop. None of those areas are as “Arizona Natural” as the Sonoran Desert
area. Preserve this area for people to enjoy not trash with developments.
There is enough congestion and traffic as it is. Not to mention, our beautiful desert is continually being built in.
Page 1272
This beautiful desert area needs to maintain its character and uniqueness. It’s the reason why many people live
in the area. Stop!!
The main reason we bought our home in this location was because of how beautiful the desert is and very
peaceful. Almost feels like we're out of town in our very own neighborhood. Also, there is already an
infrastructure challenge with the lack of grocery stores, restaurants, gas stations etc. Adding 1200 more homes
would have a major impact on everything around us and create serious traffic issues to go anywhere, even on
We are in a huge water shortage all over the country and building in our preserves just takes more resources
that we all need to survive!
Standards are acceptable as they are set. I have many safety concerns through that Corridor. This is purely profit
over planned and locals paying the price.
Deserts are fragile environments/ecosystems and overcrowded land use will create problems that will take
generations to correct. Native species need to have their environment protected.
Councilman Waring, please continue to protect the Sonoran Preserve.
So many animals will get displaced from there natural habitats.
There are limited resources that we can all share and enjoy. The Desert Character Overlay District was
established to allow for growth but also to protect our wonderful desert. We are responsible for the
stewardship of this desert for future generations.
We moved here 3 years ago. We knew we wanted this home when we were driving around the home and drove
down sonoran desert drive. We loved that the desert was so close to us, that we were going to live to close to a
preserve that our kids could learn about the Arizona and the desert right out their back door.
I live right next to it and want to see it preserved.
Traffic is already too heavy and congested. Our streets are becoming dangerous.
We need to start limiting the amount of residential builds in the Sonoran Preserve area before this majestic
natural place is no more. Preserve the habitat and recreational area this land offers local residents and tourists.
The area is already congested and poses safety concerns for bicyclists, hikers and drivers due to the increased
motor traffic activity. Adding more congestion would further escalate the risk and concern associated.
It's a Beautiful area for our community. Hiding companies should stay within how the area is zoned
It's going to change the complete landscape of our community. I do not want an excessive amount of traffic.
I live in Sonoran Gate. Moved here to be by my sons. One lives in Sonoran Gate also (6 houses away). We
moved here for the beauty and serenity of the desert preserve. Our hope was to continue to grow our family
and ensure our next generation will also have the opportunity to enjoy the beauty of this area. Hot air Balloons
and bike riders every morning. It’s a place of beauty, calmness and peace. Please do not destroy this gift. Thank
I bought 20 years in area specifically for the landscape and to be outside the city. We have so many accidents
and fatalities due the EXCESSIVE TRAFFIC. We can’t handle the i flux of cars students business. Phoenix not
supporting all the builds! What makes this area so desired is the preserve!!!
Once the natural land is gone we loose the gorgeous desert that many people move here for. Pollution has
gotten much worse in the past few years. More home mean more traffic and even worse pollution. The water
table is getting lower and more homes mean more water usage. We don’t have water for them!
No more building and take away from our desert landscape. Stop already.
I live near this area and enjoy hiking the mountain preserve. I also enjoy diving through Sonoran dessert drive
to see the beautiful landscape our state has to offer without having to drive so far away. Please don’t take this
We have lived in Sonoran foothills for 13 years. We have always loved how quiet it is up here and love the
beauty of the desert. Please do not build more homes and ruin all the great things we have up here!
To keep the nature as treasure and beautiful view
We love the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please protect what is left and save the beauty of the dessert.
Page 1273
While the continued expansion of homes and building into this area is inevitable and needed, the maintenance
of the Desert Character Overlay is important to keep the beauty and feel of this area. The residents who live
here moved here for a reason, and we appreciate the forethought that went into the Desert Character Overlay
originally. Please do not abandon this. It would be one thing if the builder were building reasonably priced
homes to assist with the affordable housing shortage, but they are not. This request is purely for the financial
advantage of the builder and the detriment of our community.
We moved to this area because of the preserve, and while we support growth, the aspects of the preserve that
can be protected, should be. It is our responsibility to growth responsively!
Desert overlay is in place to protect the area from over development. We use the preserve multiple times a
week as a family and more cars and will make it ever more difficult to access the amenities from our
We selected this area to live, in part, based on the feeling of being closer to nature. The Sonoran Preserve
played a big part in that feeling. The loss of any Preserve open space or the increase in traffic thru the Preserve
will diminish that feeling. Please require all developers to comply with existing develop restrictions and do not
"lessen" those restrictions. ‐ Thank you...
It is a spectacular preserve and should kept that way. This area can’t handle the traffic now let alone of more
developments are added.
Living by the beautiful Sonoran Mountain Preserve area and Sonoran Desert Drive, allows people to interact
positively with nature and the environment. This is necessary for people’s physical and mental well being,
which we all rediscovered during the pandemic when it was one of the few things people were allowed to do.
The Mountain Preserve allows people to connect with nature and enjoy the peaceful outdoor environment. The
people in the area love the open spaces and serenity that the Sonoran Desert Mountan Preserve provides. They
walk, bike or hike in the neighborhood everyday. If these developers are allowed to over develop this beautiful
area it will be a detriment to the already established neighborhoods by increased population through clustered
housing, traffic, safety, noise levels, over crowded schools, and a host of other issues. This mountain preserve is
vital to the well being and safety of people who chose to live for here for a better quality of life. Please don’t
allow these developers to destroy the Mountain Preserve. Thank you
I live in this area, I use the hiking trails and bike paths along Sonoran drive on a weekly basis, I love looking out
into the Desert everytime and taking in its natural beauty it has to offer, Roof tops would hinder this…. If the
county/city ever needs additional funding they can have Police officers patrol Sonoran Desert drive and would
run out of paper giving traffic tickets, its already a race track with the driving practices on this road,,,,, more
congestion will make it worst and a lot more dangerous than itvis now, I quit riding my bike in the bike lane on
that road, I ride on the bike path to the north of the road for that reason…
Like to go hiking there and see the natural views.
With all the apartments being built on the west end between Dove Valley & Sonoran Desert Drive, the traffic
will become just like the city streets—noisy and congested. Verdin proposing additional homes will make it that
much worse. In addition, we moved to this area because of the Sonoron Desert Preserve which is becoming non
We moved here to be next to open desert and away from valley traffic. Increasing to the proposed
developmentm will eliminate both of these coveted features!
The Sonoran Preserve was one of the most important reasons we purchased a house in this area. To continually
chip away at this wonderful area would be so detrimental to the wildlife that live there as well as the wonderful
hiking trails that allow people to get out and experience nature at its finest. I am strongly against ruining
anymore of the Preserve.
I want to protect the wilderness and essence of the preserve. I thought this land was protected from future
housing development
Please do not increase the level of traffic on sonoran desert parkway. The additional cars will increase risk to
current commuters and cyclists.
To adhere to our natural landscape and preserve the area and its wildlife.
Page 1274
Bike safety Road overly congested
One of the reasons I moved to this area was because of the Preserve and being told it would not be developed.
How incredibly sad we're even needing to have this discussion. Please do the right thing and save the Sonoran
Why destroy a beautiful, well loved, piece of land when we already have too many houses.
I have many reasons for you to consider preserving the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive. Homes and
traffic directly impact the fragile desert. Urban heat, pollution, and human destruction directly destroy the
desert plants. The Sonoran Preserve was set aside for the specific reason of preserving an area for people to
enjoy the beauty of the desert. Adding homes along the Sonoran Preserve and Sonoran Desert Drive will
increase traffic. Solutions to traffic congestion is to add and or expand lanes which will take up desert land.
Lastly and more importantly, Arizona is in a major drought. More homes means less water. There are plenty of
homes and apartments being built in Phoenix without taking from the Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert
Two reasons: to preserve the beauty of the preserve and the hone of the animals living there. Second, is the
traffic. We are already experiencing new heavy traffic with our growth up here and adding this will increase it
greatly. I moved up this way because of the lifestyle it afforded without so much traffic. Along with the traffic
comes more accidents, which we are already experiencing, more congestion, etc.
This is a designated Desert Sonoran Preserve. The established trails are used by thousands and the preserve
hosts habitat for Arizona wildlife including javelina, bobcat, coyote, raccoon, ground squirrel and many more.
There are a variety of bird and reptile species Gila Monster, great horned owl, roadrunner, gambles quail, Inca
dove, Cardinals, spotted whip tail and chuckwalla lizards to mention a few. This area of Phoenix cannot be
expanded into a legislated preserve. Too many apartments in the area has already increased crime, drugs and
traffic congestion. Any additional housing and apartment development requests in the north Phoenix area must
be denied. Respectfully, Bill Shackelford. Voting Resident
Concerned about excessive housing & associated traffic density causing problems & congestion. Please do not
override Desert character Overlay District guidelines
I have lived in this area for over 16 years and am a native Arizonan. The City has done a wonderful job on
Sonoran Desert Drive, in terms of incorporating areas to recreate and enjoy the unbelievable desert scenery
within the Sonoran Preserve. I have hiked the area and marvel at the beauty. Increasing the planned housing
units by multiples of two or three will significantly detract from the area's beauty and tranquility and add an
unsustainable amount of traffic and introduce ecological damage to the area. There is a reason so much land
was designated as a preserve all those years ago. It should stay that way.
I purchased my house on the southern boundary of Sonoran Gate with the intent of enjoying the serenity of the
desert in my backyard. This expansion will teplace my view with a 6 lane high traffic road. The Scenic Dove
Valley road will also become increasingly busy affecting outdoor activities such as biking.
Please preserve the beautiful desert.
We moved from the city specifically to enjoy the natural preserve and wildlife of this area. Also, we were
assured no building would take place along the Sonoran Preserve corridor. Our family loves to bike ride in the
peaceful desert preserve and request that it remains a preserve for our wildlife and for all to enjoy in it’s natural
To preserve the natural desert. Traffic is already excessive. This area is amazing for bike rides, hiking & exercise.
Let’s keep it that way.
Arizona is destroying so much of the natural land that people moved here for. I don’t want more traffic. It’s
awful as it is. Water is at emergency levels and more homes will only tax the water levels more.
Ruin of preserve / increased traffic volume
We live in the area, have hiked these trails, our two boys attended nearby CCUSD Horseshoe Trails elementary
school, and I’d say that in general we have a strong desire to act as good stewards of this land and therefore
have a vested interest in maintaining the beauty of the Sonoran desert preserve and our balance with nature.
We need to preserve our natural habitat.Increased construction around the area already put too much load on
traffic and school system.We have no new building of schools and we are worried where all these will get
Page 1275
The beauty and sanctity of Sonoran preserve and the surrounding area is vital to our wildlife and maintaining
there habitats is crucial to these animals that are being continually uprooted by builders and developers greed.
Traffic is already increasing on Sonoran dessert drive and frankly adding more homes will make it more
dangerous for people trying to enjoy the beauty nature is already providing us. We cannot keep destroying
Arizona’s natural beauty just to pad the pockets of a few and bring in more people to an already overpopulated
area, where policing these areas is challenging already for our stretched to the limit police force. Stop building
and start enjoying the beauty that our Sonoran preserve is providing us.
Too much growth and congestion. Lack of conservation to desert land and outdoor activities.
Overdeveloping is irresponsible when there’s no plan for increased traffic and water supply!
Keep our desert traffic and congestion to a minimum; we still enjoy a lot of wildlife.
We need less development and more room to safely enjoy nature with trails and outdoor activities. Dove Valley
Rd is already a speed zone and super trafficked, more development is a detriment to our beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. Please reject this proposal.
The scenery is beautiful along Sonoran Desert Drive and to see sections of it being developed for housing
projects will take away from the beauty that we have all come to love about this area.
The extra traffic flow will affect all the wild life amongst many other reasons.
The Sonoran Desert Preserve is so beautiful and serves MANY purposes. That's why we moved here, and we
don't want to lose it ! We MUST keep development at a reasonable amount.
We moved up here to be away from the crowds and we love the desert landscape And the air quality is better
for our son who has asthma
This project has the ability to set precedence for any other development. The fact the developer is asking to
refine for more houses and remove the desert overlay is a slippery slope to having high density homes stacked
on what is one of the mist beautiful areas of desert. It is too dense, goes against city plans meant to protect the
desert character of north Phoenix and will bring an influx of traffic to the area. Please look at giving up some
land somewhere else that is not across from a beautiful nature preserve.
My family and I are avid cyclists, and for the past five years we have seen an increase of cars and speed. I myself
had a couple of car and motorcycle incidents due to the amount of traffic and their speed. I’m worried that with
the increase of housing it’s only going to make our rides more dangerous, as drivers don’t respect speed limits.
Please keep the overlay as it was intended. Don’t put money over our safety. Thank you
I want it to remain natural. Don’t want more noise, development coming to the area.
We do not want the sonoran preserve to be destroyed just to build some additional homes. The traffic is already
a major problem and there is not enough infrastructure and businesses around here to support all these homes.
To much growth for what this area was set up to be.
I moved to this area because I love the open spaces.
I am for protecting as much land as possible and conserving water.
It’s a beautiful area to walk or hike or bike and it’s the last area I know of that is close to me. Otherwise I’d have
to drive over 40 minutes to find a preserve that is wild and natural
The Sonoran Preserve needs to be saved, it provides recreation like walking, hiking and biking. Also, it keeps the
heat down. Adding more homes will only create more traffic. One of the reasons we moved to this area is due
to this Sonoran Preserve.
The traffic currently traveling on Sonora Desert Dr is already at a dangerous amount. Not specifically due to
frequency or number of users, but due primarily to their speed on the roadway. The current speed limit is
45mph, but traffic regularly travels in excess of 60mph. This in combination with the vulnerable users of the
road and the addition of a significant amount of vehicles is a disaster in the making for the roadway as it is now.
Traffic concerns and safety for cyclists along SDD.
Page 1276
I love the desert landscape, and enjoy hiking on my time off work. I see the amount of buildings that are being
constructed and the traffic it is creating. Please do not destroy the little bit of desert that exists in this large city,
the habitat of our beloved desert animals.
I am a third generation Phoenician and have lived in North Phoenix most of my life. I have watched the growth
of the valley over the years and am not opposed to progress but it needs to be done thoughtfully and
responsibly. This proposal to increase the number of homes along the Sonoran Desert drive is reckless and
irresponsible. The developers of the Verdin project are not thinking about the residents of the area or the future
generations that will use the preserve but are rather motivated by the lure of maximizing their profits. I am
strongly opposed to discarding the charter and hope that as our representatives you will do the right thing for
the citizens of this area. Seriously take into consideration what’s best for not only the residents but also the
wildlife and the desert itself. This decision will not only impact our quality of life but the quality of life for those
that will come long after we’re gone. A sea of homes and pushing more and more people into an untouched
area of desert is not good for the future of our community.
We moved here from Chicago to near a more spacious beautiful desert area. We've watched the traffic increase
three fold which takes away from safety and the beauty of the land. We moved her to be near the natural
preserves, hike, bike and enjoy nature. In the almost 6 years we've been here we rarely see the wild life we've
come to love no longer around. Traffic on North Valley is dangerous at times.
Beautiful drive and prime hiking area
The Sonoran Preserve was the deciding factor for my wife and I to move to this area. We had hoped that
Preserve would stay as it is a Natural desert landscape that was protected for all to enjoy. We enjoy the
numerous hiking trails, walking areas that are safe and the pavilions that we use to gather with friends . We
knew that there would be issues when we seen new developments popping up and took away the Natural
surroundings. This has to stop . Did I mention the wildlife that we all see and enjoy? These developments are all
about one thing ‐ greed. Please let this continue to be the Sonoran Preserve!
Wide open space without traffic & housing congestion, w/o water & schooling requirements is vital to this area
of the Sonoran Preserve.
Additional development will ruin the Sonoran Reserve’s pristine nature. Please preserve this vital area for our
Desert’s wildlife for generations to come to enjoy .
The Donoran a preserve is a peaceful area used by many people for hiking, mountain biking and horseback
riding. Adding more houses will increase the number of people using the trails as well as create more traffic in
I do not wish to see this beautiful desert landscape overcome with more traffic and houses.
I’m concerned about all the animals in the area. As well as if you continue to build what about the schools and
the traffic. It no longer will be a peaceful environment. And the more expensive homes you build people really
can’t afford them but end up in bankruptcy and then they’ll be empty
I ride my bike religiously on Sonoran Drive and bike safety for our cyclist should be a main concern and priority.
I am very concerned about the additional traffic volume that will be a result of large Verdin community. I am a
triathlete who uses Sonoran Desert Dr. daily for training and with the increased traffic I fear for my safety. In
addition, we moved to this area (85085) for the beauty of the desert. Abandoning the Desert Character Overlay
District will eliminate the protections that were placed to ensure conservation of the ecosystems in the area
while still allowing for some development. The large number of homes the Verdin development company
proposes to squeeze into this area will detract from the wilderness and beauty of the Preserve. Yet, another
area of concern would be the overcrowding of schools in the Deer Valley School district.
Page 1277
The desert in the Sonoran Desert Preserve is already quite overused by hikers, bikers and equestrian riders. By
increasing the population adjacent to this preserve, not only will it lose its true wilderness experience, but it will
have increased urban pressures placed upon it, threatening its very existence. Additionally, as I live just meters
from Dove Valley Trail and witness the already heavy traffic along this corridor that connects to Sonoran Desert
Drive, any increased volumes in traffic would effectively make it very difficult to exit my community onto Dove
Valley Road where no traffic lights exist.
Area should remain as it is. Area is also over populated with new homes and congestion with traffic.
Sonoran Desert Drive & surrounding preserve area can not accommodate traffic volume due to proposed Verdin
development.
Ignoring the desert character overlay district would be a HUGE mistake. Overdevelopment will ruin the desert
and will change the habitat in and around that area and big developers don’t care about that so it’s our job to
care for them.
Traffic is already becoming very busy along Sonoran Desert Drive. Many large trucks are using this now too. We
were told this area was supposed to preserve the Sonoran Desert. Many people use the bike paths and hiking
paths. I feel it would become more dangerous to use these paths with the increase of doubling or tripling traffic
with the increased number of homes they are asking for. Keep the same number of homes it was originally
I am a city of Phoenix park steward for the far north valley preserves including Apache Wash and Dixie
Mountain. I patrol these trails for hiker safety several times of month. The beauty and open desert landscape of
the Sonoran area is a prime reason why people move to this area or visit it to hike or bike. Please do not add
higher density housing and destroy the open land we currently enjoy.
The growth in this area is already at an all time high. This small area of desert PRESERVE is why many of us
moved to the area. The PRESERVE is used by hikers and bikers as a beautiful getaway that is in our backyard.
Every other inch has already been developed by apartment complexes. Enough!! Leave our PRESERVE alone!!
I do not want the desert destroyed any more than it already has been, it needs to be preserved. I hike daily
along the trails from Apache Wash to Paloma Pkwy, the scenic views are being compromised by building, the
noise of the traffic is ruining the peace of the outside and nearing running me off the road as I try to cross to the
trails. It's insane the number of cars already and Copperleaf development isn't even populated yet. No more
homes to destroy the serenity and beauty of this area.
I prefer an environment that is a balance between housing and open land
This drive is very vital for bikers and the natural trails and parks the residents across the city come to enjoy. The
new development across the dedicated Sonoran landscape is going to spoil everything and increase the safety
concerns on the biking corridor. This corridor is used by Olympic gold medal winners , Tour de France
Maintain the natural open space in this areas Traffic congestion issues
The Desert Character is an important part of Phoenix that needs to be kept preserved and available for all
Phoenicians and other AZ residents to enjoy the natural scene this Sonoran Desert can provide outside of the
busy metropolis of the Phoenix metroplex and other surrounding cities.
Need to preserve as much of our beautiful mountains as possible
Wildlife protection and natural beauty
Our desert is part of our lifestyle's. Many of us hike and enjoy our desert landscape. The area is not built for
even 400+ homes, with an average of 2 vehicles per home. Our local school system doesn’t support the vast
amount of new developments going up currently. It’s will also decrease night visibility of the sky in the evening
for those who use telescopes. It will also increase area emissions, pollution visibility, and area temperature.
People need places to live but so do animals. The Southwest has beautiful deserts and what makes this place
I moved up in this area to get away from the city, crowds and traffic, enjoy the outdoors to hike and cycle.
We need to keep as much of the natural habitat in this area as possible for the enjoyment of all residents and
Page 1278
Too much traffic already
My family and I love hiking in the Sonoran Preserve. It’s how we spend our weekends. We would hate to lose
anymore of the land, the atmosphere, the animals. Please save the land. Thank you
Our family enjoys the scenic drive down Sonoran Desert Drive. I’m saddened to hear they already have plans to
develop some of that land. The dessert landscape and easy access to trails from Fireside are unique to living in
Norterra and I would hate to see that change. It’s already becoming over crowded up here and traffic is
effected. Please consider preserving our beautiful desert landscape.
Want to keep area lower traffic
GREED at its finest asking to ignore the Desert Character Overlay District... PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS!!!!
Seriously...one more development along the route is no good. Too much traffic now for those who frequent the
area.
I have lived here for 10 years and watched the beauty of the desert being destroyed with development. The
plants, animals and the majestic beauty of the desert is ruined by the continued development until there is no
desert left. It is very sad.
I absolutely love the beauty of the desert and the opportunity we have to get out in the preserve to hike, run
and bike. I am an avid trail runner and hiker and would be devastated if we lose that ability just to make way for
more houses.
The Preserve is meant to be just that——preserved. Excess traffic, construction and increased carbon footprint
will endanger the flora and fauna of our beautiful desert. Please protect it!
1. Concerned about wildlife being displaced and natural habitats being significantly reduced 2. High occupancy
buildings coupled with houses will bring more traffic and pollution and impact the infrastructure 3. Impact on
city resources such as water especially scary as water levels are so low 4 impact to education facilities ‐ schools
are over crowded
We love biking on the path along the reserve with our 2 girls, crossing Sonoran Desert is already a bit nerve
wracking with current traffic, I can't imagine how much this would increase given the added homes. This is such
a beautiful stretch of road and adding these homes would greatly impact the noise, traffic and beauty of this
area. Not to mention the surrounding grocery stores, roadways and restaurants are already stretched so thin
because the number of homes has increased greatly without the other resources to support it!
The area should be preserved for enjoying the natural surroundings.
Please save the desert preserve, this is very important! Thank you
Need Preserve, otherwise we will lose out on the beautiful scenery and have way to much congestion.
I love this natural area. It is very important that the building be kept down as we are losing our natural areas to
concrete and overdevelopment. AZ does not have enough water for all of these homes/buildings. Traffic is
horrendous already. Please don’t do this.
It changes the whole landscape of our community. Every available space is being built and we are losing the
beauty of our area.
We need to keep as much nature untouched and beautiful.
The Sonoran preserve is just that, “A preserve”. It was specifically zoned to prevent this kind of development,
or any development for that matter. We use this area almost on a daily basis for hiking, biking and driving on
the parkway. If these projects are developed and built I will seriously consider leaving this area and moving to a
quieter place. These builders should look for other areas not designated as preserves to build their housing.
Preservation of our land is critical. While I accept development that has been approved, businesses need to
consider the impact to the surrounding area and growth for the sake of growth is not an acceptable plan.
Page 1279
Actions need to be taken to preserve the natural landscapes of Arizona. The degradation of lands is reaching a
tipping point. The area does not have the infrastructure, business, school capacity nor natural resources to
support this development. Corporate greed is advancing the rapid expansion of the Sonoran desert and we are
on the cusp of a major water shortages in the region. Enough, have some foresight for future generations for
Resource impact and cyclist safety
Keeping the integrity of the preserve intact while allowing current hiking, biking, and traffic levels to remain the
Have you seen how beautiful this portion of metro‐ Phoenix is. We absolutely do not need more and more and
more. We have enough people streaming into our state already, no need to encourage more.
The sonoran preserve is a beautiful place that is essential to maintaining the ecological balance for wildlife and
vegetation. The developers and owners knew the rules of the overlay district when they decided to develop,
and should be required to follow it. Not doing so benefits only them, and puts the damages on all other citizens.
The builder should be held to the character overlay that is in place to ensure the neighborhood fits into the
desert landscape.
The Preserve was the reason we moved here 14years ago. The city should not be able to re‐zone and stick with
the original plan to leave it for hiking biking etc. There is plenty of land on the west side of I‐17. Way too
much growth, traffic, and Desert lost to developers. with NO regard for the quiet life we enjoy In north Phoenix.
Too much housing buildout, let's slow it down
We need to keep our natural surroundings for the overall health of our environment.
We only get one chance to maintain the character of our community. Once altered, there is no going back.
We need more open space and already have enough homes!
As a former 12 year resident of the Desert Canyon subdivision (32nd / Beardsley) I have supported the efforts of
SOS‐P since the rezoning signs went up. I find it deeply ironic and fundamentally offensive that the first ask of
the developer is to set aside law and planning already in place that ensures what they only pretend to espouse
(“ environmental commitment to raising the bar for protecting and preserving the desert environment”).
We love the beauty and tranquility of the desert.
I hike on the trails of the Sonoran Preserve many times a week, enjoying the beauty of the untouched desert. It
would diminish the quality of the experience by adding more and more housing developments to the view.
The Sonoran preserve is a spot where I hike, bike and run 5‐6 times per week. I truly enjoy the beautiful natural
preserve this area has. The animals I see during my adventures is also priceless. I truly hope this petition
makes a change !
I live very close to the Sonoran Preserve. My family and I love living near the preserve because we get to enjoy
beautiful hiking and biking trails right in our back yard. The trails are clean, well maintained and much less
crowded than other trails in Phoenix, such as Camelback Mountain and Piestewa Peak. The Sonoran Preserve is
the reason we moved the North Valley. And we moved here based on the growth parameters identified by the
Desert Character Overlay District, which were instilled to safeguard the Preserve. Please don’t alter the growth
density plans, it’s not good for the viability of the Preserve and it’s not fair to the residents who moved to the
area based on the development measures in place.
It is important to save the Preserve and Drive because developers and their need for more and more money is
literally killing the desert and taking away all things that are indigenous to this perfect State I have lived in my
whole life, born and raised. I have worked up in this area for 20 plus years and it has been so sad to see the loss
of the desert. The Sonora Desert Drive is something so special and one of the few places left in the Valley that
makes you feel like you are really in the desert without thousands of pieces of property. Please do not take
away the beauty of these areas!!!
We love going to the preserve as a family, and having another major development project will only bring more
traffic, noise, and wildlife displacement. We need to do better and protect our wildlife and say no to money
Traffic will increase dramatically! Hiking and cycling will no longer be enjoyable and r safe.
Page 1280
My household enjoys both biking and hiking along the Sonoran Desert Drive several times a week. One of the
main reasons I moved out of the Kierland area was to escape the traffic/congestion. Please don't turn my
beautiful Sonoran Preserve into a traffic nightmare. Uphold the safeguards that make this preserve a treasure.
Thank you, Councilman Waring.
Me and my friends use that area to ride our bicycles and hike and just enjoy the desert and it would be
dangerous with it a lot more traffic out that way and it will destroy the beautiful desert environment please do
This will affect the local fauna and flora and compromise what is supposed to be a protected ecossystem.
Traffic is already heavy and dangerous for my wife who bikes and myself walking
It is nature at its finest. The desert is dwindling especially in this area with all of the commercial building and
housing going up. The hot air balloons are even running out of space to take off from and land on. Dove Valley
Road / Sonoran Desert Drive has become a speedway and dumping ground. It is a shame that people have such
disregard for such a beautiful area and putting up more housing will only make it worse. Years ago we were told
that no homes would be built off of that road. I know because I used to live in Carefree Crossings and attended
many meetings about it. Listen to the people for a change and leave this area alone. It was built for people to
enjoy it, not destroy it.
We need to preserve the beauty of the desert.
I use the preserve at least 3 times a week for fitness. Mountain biking, hiking, and trail running. Wildlife
encounters are always beautiful and their habitat must be preserved. The human population density in this area
is already getting to be more than what it can sustain.
We need to limit desert impact & traffic in the area as it’s already getting congested.
Phoenix is growing at a very rapid rate. If something is not done now to save lands, there will be no desert areas
left and all wildlife here will perish. We must preserve this unique Sonoran Preserve.
We love our desert and the fascinating wild life! Lets all work together to conserve our beautiful desert!
We need to preserve the hiking and biking trails as well as the bike lane on Desert Sonoran Drive to keep it safe
for pedestrians and cyclist.
The Sonoran Preserve is a beautiful area that lends this neighborhood a great amount of character and appeal.
Over‐development would greatly detract from this, leaving it just another sprawl.
I urge City Council to require Taylor Morrison to comply with Desert Character Overlay safeguards. We moved
to this area because of the close proximity to hiking and biking and close to nature. This is necessary for
people’s physical and mental well being.
We need to maintain the beauty of the valley. Areas need to be protected and respected so all can enjoy.
Quality of Life will be destroyed! Let us start with habitat destruction. Then let's discuss the water shortage.
September 2021, it was reported that the Bureau of Reclamation has declared a water shortage on the Colorado
River, which means that Arizona, along with Nevada and Mexico, will get less water than normal by 2022. If we
continue to destroy our desert with unnecessary development for the sake of the almighty dollar then we might
as well lift all restrictions. When will it end? When is enough growth enough? Maricopa County was the number
one county in the nation for growth in the past year. This needs to stop! We are destroying our human habitat
by allowing these developers to bully their way into these areas. Now let's discuss safety? Look at our Police
Dept or lack thereof. We can't sustain this ridiculous growth. Please do what you can to help preserve our
beautiful Sonoran Preserve!
Tjhis is the last strip of Sonoran Desert left in Phoenix. I'm sorrythe preserve doesn't border Dove Valley. Whats
done is gone do not make it worse by 3X the number of people
I prefer to keep the Somoran Preseve “wild” for all to enjoy. Please stop taking beautiful desert away from the
residents that moved here to be near it.
Primary reason we moved to this area from Houston is to avoid the glut of development and related traffic that
we had in Texas. Please let us retain the environment we fell in love with back in 2010.
Page 1281
Too many people and too much traffic is bad for the environment and the people living in the area, like me.
Traffic will likely significantly increase staying within the growth guidelines, so ignoring the guidelines and
increasing the number of dwellings in the area beyond the guidelines will make traffic and life even worse.
I love to hike the trails with my dog and my family. It is often the only exercise my aging parents get.
Everywhere near Sonoran preserve and desert drive constructions are happening, it’s a very beautiful hike place
to enjoy quality time with family and friends, as a neighborhood resident I would like to keep it beautiful and
not have homes after homes getting built there… there are hardly any community park getting built in the area..
I urge you not to ignore the Desert Character Overly District and over develop one of the few remaining
preserves in city limits so a developer can make more money. Please consider your constituents way of life and
safety over profits for a corporation. Thank you for your consideration.
Traffic is my main issue. As a Sonoran bike route it is becoming more and more dangerous for bikers. School
traffic on main roads and through neighborhoods also has become more dangerous. Wilderness can never be
recaptured once homes are built so we have a once in a lifetime duty to save land for conservation and wildlife.
Thanks for listening
The Sonoran Preserve is important to me because of the beauty if the area and the animals that call it home.
Sonoran Desert Drive needs to remain a less busy road so it is safe for the bicyclists that use it for exercise and
the people that walk the path along the road and preserve.
We need to preserve it for the wildlife that lives in it and keep the beauty of the desert environment in tact.
My friends and family and their pets walk there every day! Also it’s called a PRESERVE!!! Preserve it!
We need to preserve the beauty of our natural habitats. There are already plenty of places that are zoned for
building. Please do not let greed ruin our neighborhood.
Protect the Sonoran preserve
We live in the area and do not need to have more houses built, apartments, etc. The traffic is becoming
unbearable, and to abolish the desert is a terrible thing for the wildlife and beauty of the desert. I enjoy hiking
We love walking, & biking sonoran desert drive. It's nice to be active in that pristine desert. Please keep the
DCOD safeguards active
Ekosystem Preservation of natural wild life
I have children and grandchildren, outside the gates, it's TOTALLY UNSAFE TO RIDE BICKES, TRAFFIC IS
ABSOLUTELY 💯 INSANE WHATTTT IF IT WERE YOUR NEIGHBOR HOOD? Thank you
Volume of traffic will be too extreme and hiking, cycling and just walking will be negatively impacted.
Biological and cultural resources
I hike from Apache Wash frequently as well as the trails in Sonoran Preserve South and don’t want to see the
desert character of these areas impacted. Please hold Taylor Morrison to these rules. They were put in place for
a reason. Don’t allow them to disregard them.
This city is growing so fast & we need to preserve some of the beautiful desert landscape. If we keep building
more houses, we will have nothing left. We don’t need more houses!!
I firmly feel that natural areas have to be maintained and protected in order to maintain the beauty and balance
of our communities. Doubling or tripling the traffic on the Sonora Parkway within the areas of the Preserve will
most definitely create safety issues with cycling and walking for all folks wanting to enjoy the beauty of the
This place is an amazing getaway for families to go walk, cycle and hike. It’s nice to go over there without all of
the traffic that goes through there. It is such a beautiful scenery that should not be taken away.
Our family enjoys the wildlife and open beauty that the preserve provides very much.
There has been enough development in this area. Stop crowding out the wildlife.
Overcrowding is harmful to animals and to people. There are already too many car accidents due to the current
road infrastructure doesn’t support the number of people in this area. Therefore, more growth in this area will
lead to higher traffic volumes and increased car accidents. Thank you for this opportunity to voice my concern.
Page 1282
We love to hike this beautiful area. Also the drive down Sonoran parkway is incredible. We must preserve this
desert not only for human enjoyment but also the wildlife that call it home
This land is our closest access to nature. It is where I hike. It is where I take my children to visit the great horned
owl nest. This land is theirs—not to be traded in a land swap where a few people get rich at the expense of our
nature preserve.
It’s imperative to preserve and protect the wildlife and their natural habitat. This area is already exploding with
growth & traffic.
This area is beautiful and it would be a shame for it to be overdeveloped.
As a resident here, we need to preserve our natural habitat. You need to think about building more schools
before taking over the desert preserve and destroying the ecosystem just so you can make some builders happy
through these deals. If we can't preserve our "Preserve", then what is even the point?
I've lived in this area for many years and treasure the Sonoran Desert Preserve beyond measure. As an avid
hiker and lover of the unique beauty, plant life and wildlife of the Sonoran Desert, I feel privileged to be able to
enjoy this natural area as part of my "everyday." I'm also aware and incredibly proud of the hard work and
careful thought that went into preserving this land in the first place. It was a job so very well done, and I would
be incredibly disappointed and dispirited to see those efforts and safeguards dismantled in any way.
We chose to move to Sonoran Foothills to be close to the desert landscape and away from the dense population
of the city. We understood that the city had protected the areas surrounding the preserve by requiring certain
standards and limiting the number of homes that can be built. The requirements that were in place while the
Sonoran foothills community was being built, maintain the overall integrity of the surrounding desert. There is a
mix of apartment homes, patio homes and homes with lots. All were required to follow strict landscaping
guidelines to match the desert. Why aren’t these standards being upheld for any future development? It is
evident that greed is now winning. The home builders goal is to build as many houses as will be allowed as this is
most profitable for them. They are NOT concerned with the impact this will have on traffic, current residents or
the desert. Also, it appears the city is trying to solve the housing shortage by putting in a disproportionate
number of high density dwellings from I‐17 to Cave Creek.
There is already a staggering amount of traffic between the preserves and additional housing per acre only
harms these sacred areas. We are growing at a staggering rate and sacrificing our beautiful lands and existing
safe guards isn't the right approach to addressing this growth. The land and homes will sell and the only reason
to increase hones per acre is to increase their profits.
Original 2006 owner who has seen this area grow and change. I’m very concerned about the population over
expansion in this area. I live right off Dove Valley which has already become unsafe due to traffic volume and
lack of proper traffic signals (some of which are on the way). However, I don’t believe Dove Valley was ever
intended to hold the kind of volume it will experience if growth is not governed. I for one wholeheartedly
support the enforcement of the Desert Character Overlay District. Thank you
An agreement was made to limit the number of homes for the area, why now is it ok to go back on that. Will
bring more traffic and ruin to area from overpopulation.
The Sonoran Preserve is a special and somewhat rare piece of Phoenix. It provides beautiful trails and vistas for
all Phoenicians within the city limits. As the city continues to grow I believe we need to preserve these few
natural spaces for all to enjoy.
When we moved from Wisconsin we specifically picked the Sonoran Desert Preserve area because it was so
beautiful and peaceful. Please do not ruin it by putting up homes there. It is a protected preserve for a reason ‐‐
to keep it natural.
Way too much traffic
This area needs to be preserved as originally designed in order for the members of this community to enjoy a
place to get away from all the over development.
Page 1283
Protecting preserve areas within an urban community is important and contributes to a healthy quality of life.
Respectful development along the perimeter of a preserve protects the integrity of the native area. I want the
desert overlay left in place as it is the legal vehicle created with intention to accomplish this. We need to be
forward thinking as we approve developments especially when they border preserve areas that were acquired
and built with significant personal and financial resources!
Desert preservation. Water conservation
The Sonoran Preserve and Sonora Desert Drive must under all circumstances remain intake and undisturbed
Preserving open spaces is becoming more and more important as they are being lost at a alarming rate.
Increasing housing density is damaging with increased traffic, pollution and water usage.
Our house backs up to the desert. We bought that house because it backs up to the desert, I want to to keep
our view and our slower simple lifestyle there and not turn its into a big city feel.
To preserve the beautiful views of the desert and maintain wildlife and landscape.
it's a natural treasure that is special and needs to be protected.
The Phoenix metro area is quickly consuming our natural wildlife. The Sonoran preserve and areas around the
preserve are blessings to those near them. An escape from the overgrowth of population.
Preserve natura
I am an avid mountain and road cyclist in THIS area, especially! I also hike and run in the preserve. Safe to say I
am absolutely for the preservation of the Sonoran Preserve. I live in an area very near where a housing
development is under way and the amount of houses being built will be over double what was originally zoned.
Please let those that run the show consider the longer (negative) lasting impacts of high‐density development to
what we have all found profoundly beautiful and desiring of this area; the Sonoran Desert!
I have lived in this area for 11 years and have been walking those trails for just as long. It is an amazing preserve
that I treasure walking every single day. The scenery is beautiful and the wildlife thrives in the area. Losing any
portion of this place would be a disgrace to this gorgeous piece of land that should be protected for the people
of our area. Please reconsider this, i am beyond disappointed to hear that this is even a thought. Please save our
Northern Phoenix is already getting overrun by new developments. Would be nice to keep some lands in their
natural state so we can enjoy the beauty it brings
My main hiking spot, beautiful views, would think u are out in the wilderness
I am concerned because my backyard will face the six lane road. As it is the two lane road(dove valley and
Sonoran dessert drive) is driven like a freeway and most people do not go the speed limit. I could just imagine
what the six lane would be like behind us. When we purchased this home we were not made aware of the plans
the city had for this area. Very disappointed. Also Verdin having 1400 hundred homes would really make the
traffic crazier than it already is right now.. like I said very disappointing!!
Desire to maintain the nature preserve and to limit traffic and related safety hazards.
No need for more development eating up our desert.
We moved to our current home to enjoy the benefits of having access to the Sonoran Preserve. The Desert
Character Overlay District was created to preserve the integrity of this precious commodity, if it is ignored, the
beauty and recreational benefits of the preserve will be significantly reduced.
I chose this area because of the preserve and hiking trails. We love the motorcycle rides through the area on our
way up to Cave Creek. I already think they are building too much and it’s going to overpopulate and ruin the
very reason we chose to live in this area.
I walk the desert everyday it is vital to keep it preserved . Arizona is in danger , water shortage , wildlife please
keep preserve
Our wildlife is being displaced and soon will not have a place to live. People want them killed as they are afraid
of them! We will live in a denser area and it will soon feel like NY City! We must find a balance for all.
Page 1284
Conservation will protect the wildlife. Driving them out of their natural habitat could put some animals at risk of
extinction. There are other desert areas/land that could be built on. Preserving will help reduce our footprint
and help reduce traffic and pollution.
Keeping some semblance of the desert lifestyle is why we moved here. Do not ignore the safeguards. Reduce
the number of housing units. Why do you want to do business with a company which clearly does not respect
nature, but only the economic bottom line ‐$
This would cause pollution dust noise and would be harmful to our health
I am concern about the beauty of the Desert Landscape and more concerned about the increase in traffic that
will be on Dove Valley/Sororan Desert Drives. Besides Verdin there is also the new semiconductor plant going
up west of us that will increase traffic. There is also 2 other new housing developments going up on Dove Valley
and also Sonoran Desert Dr west of Paloma Pkwy. This will also increase traffic tremendously on Dove
Valley/Sonoran Desert Drives. Please be concerned that traffic could increase 10 times the current rate and that
your plan to expand lanes is already insufficient.
The Sonoran preserve area is vital to providing a habitats for all the wonderful creatures and wildlife in the area.
It also provides for great walking trails for people to enjoy and get exercise while exploring all that Arizona has
The Sonoran Preserve and surrounding area are why we moved to the North Valley 7 years ago. The natural
beauty and outdoor activities make it our special home. We need to manage and control growth so it will not
negatively impact our surroundings with excessive traffic. Thank‐you.
Preserve land is sacred and should maintained as suck to keep the value to it's community members.
Traffic on the preserve road is already quite busy during rush hour. Adding more homes will increase the danger
of the road and damage the beautiful desert.
The beautiful hiking biking and walking trails!! What they are proposing is way too many homes for in the
middle of the preserve!!
I moved to this location in 2019 to be away from congestion of traffic and buildings. I am already concerned
about the traffic on Sonoran Parkway/Dove Valley. I love the open desert and trails and lack of buildings. This
area needs these open spaces to remain as building and development is moving closer to the preserve on all
sides. Help save some precious desert/animals/freedom and peaceful nightblack skies!
As a resident of a nearby community I am concerned that the traffic that will be generated by the proposed
Verdin community will present many safety concerns. The Preserve provides a tranquil environment that will
most likely change dramatically in character if this densely populated community is built. I don’t mind some
building along the route but only if it is not populated as densely as some of the surrounding developments.
We need to save our desert preserve and wildlife. There are plenty if other placex in the area and in Phoenix
where it is more appropriate and less disruptive to build.
Destroying the desert, views and too much traffic on Dove Valley/Sonoran PkwyN which also funnels to Jomax
where many school‐aged child ride bikes and walk.
This is my neighborhood..I live here. I hike these beautiful trails five times a week. There are plenty of acres of
desert in other areas. People come from all over the valley to hike and bike here.This land has been set aside
for this and should not be taken away.
I am signing this because we would not have moved to this area had we known it was even possible for a
developer to unilaterally request a community density plan, carefully and deliberately produced and agreed
upon, be thrown out so a company can increase profit. I question the ethics of a company that would even
propose it. I question the ethics of a local government that would even entertain it.
Mark Dotterer
Marcella Mccormack
Page 1285
This is a beautiful and vibrant part of our community. Don’t destroy it by adding additional residential
development. Once those houses get in there, they are going to be complaining and advocating for commercial
development because they don’t want to drive 20 minutes to shops and restaurants. Before we know it, all of
the preserve will be gone. The hiking trails, the nature, and the area is pristine.
It is important to me to keep our beautiful desert open and the way nature intended it to be. We are the desert
southwest and everyone should be able to enjoy the beautiful scenery. It does not do anything or anyone any
good to fill it with homes and commercial properties that would only increase traffic, smog, trash and unwanted
things. Our desert animals need their home and do not need to be pushed out due to unwanted construction.
I believe there are multiple reasons for keeping our views for all to enjoy ‐ to preserve the desert and the
animals ‐ so we can enjoy the solace in this wonderful area by walking, biking, driving or just plain relaxing in the
outdoors. Also driving on this Sonoran stretch of road currently needs more restrictions ‐ such as traffic lights at
all intersections for turning. Much speeding ‐ need to have more monitoring of speed requirements. Adding
more housing is just going to add to a lose of the desert preserve and impossible street/road conditions. When
we built our home here, we were told that there were restrictions to keep our desert preserved.
We live along the Sonoran Preserve. We bought here because it was a quiet peaceful area to raise kids and
explore nature. Please don’t allow more homes to destroy this area of nature. It will ruin the bike trail and
hiking trails and cause a lot more traffic in the area.
Concerned about traffic, School crowding, and preserving the desert. They need to keep the desert safe guards
in place.
We are losing the beauty and integrity of the area that makes the Phoenix valley iconic.
I moved to this area to enjoy the desert and the wildlife associated with the environment. Developers have one
objective ‐ money. We must preserve what is left of this beautiful landscape
My husband and I moved into the area specifically for the trails and wilderness of the Sonoran Preserve. We
hike the trails at least twice a week with our dogs. Please do not allow more encroachment just for the sake of
making more money! I am a retired registered nurse and served the indigent populations and can't afford to
move again. Please stop this!
I hike in the preserve almost daily, and would like to continue to enjoy the nature and the solitude. There are so
many other areas to build along the I‐17 corridor, so why cause more damage to the beautiful Arizona desert
and the wildlife living there. I used to hike Thunderbird, but that's a couple foothills with development all
around, whereas the Sonoran Preserve is just that ‐ a preserve to protect wildlife and allow people to enjoy
nature. Please don't allow any more development of the land!
ASU has spent millons in studies, to this DAY, of the wildlife is THIS IMMEDIATE area. The area between these
two washes are a habitat for species that exist NO where else. Contact ASU if you don't believe me, they have a
professor that performs studies out there...they have for many years! In addition, the access roads proposed
are between two bridges that are TOO low. There needs to be a NEW study performed on how the destruction
of the plains will affect run off and increased volume in the washes! Otherwise, one heavy monsoon might wash
the people and homes away.
We moved to this area specifically to enjoy the natural beauty of the desert Hiking, biking, and walking is an
important part of the north valley lifestyle Please do not allow developers to ruin it with dense urban housing
It's rare coming from Vegas to have such a natural landscape. It's so beautiful to have natural landscape and to
have the desert wildlife around our home. There's plenty of other places they can build and they're building
now. Save the preserve and the wildlife. They can build somewhere else that isn't here.
I’ve lived in the preserve area since I was very little. We need to keep the desert a desert, our native animals
are continually being forced to co habitate with humans and it’s not going welk. Continue to give them their
space so that we can all live together without hostile interaction
I am concerned with the number of people packed into a small space. Not only would this increase traffic to an
unmanageable level but will ruin the desert in this area.
Page 1286
We have enough housing in our area. Please keep the land open so that families can continue to enjoy our
Sonoran Preserve.
This zoning would be uncharacteristic of the Sonoran preserve and city park surrounding the site.
The preserve gives us hiking trails and allows everyone to enjoy the beauty of the Arizona desert and wildlife. It
would also dramatically decrease property values for the people voting for you to remain in office.
The Sonoran preserve is just that, a Preserve. It preserves many species of plants and wildlife that is indigenous
to the area. It is vitally important that we preserve this area for our children and their children.
We need to keep the open land and what makes our area great.
I love hiking in the preserve. Anyone who intends on building anywhere close to it needs to follow the rules.
Our desert is at risk. We need you to protect it by requiring the builder to do the right thing.
Preserve landscape, Mountain View’s, prevent traffic
With so much growth in Arizona & Phoenix in particular, it is vital to retain the open spaces for all residents to
use and enjoy ‐ there was great foresight when determining preserves and buffered lands around them. The
roads ‐ current and even proposed new ones ‐ won’t be able to safely support the sudden surge of vehicles and
will most definitely increase the traffic volume and many drivers, bikers and pedestrians will experience a
greater risk of accidents. Please listen to the residents in the area that will be most impacted. Thank you.
This land is important to keep more open than crowded!
I have lived in this area for twenty years and it is getting so crowded and overbuilt. We must preserve open
outdoor space for people to enjoy the peace of the desert and recreation areas that are our Arizona treasures
Aaron Cushner
the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards were put in place to keep this specific and unique area from
overdevelopment and should not be overturned due to developer greed.
To prevent additional congestion and traffic and to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
I know that growth in our area needs to happen but it shouldn’t be so much that it take away from the Preserve
and the reasons we moved here.
It's wrong to ignore our Desert Character Overlay District! We bought our home here because of these
protections, and we love our desert! Thank you!
Will Ruin the wildlife and nature surrounding the preserve in addition to increasing the already challenging
traffic issues on Sonoran desert drive
Uniquely beautiful desert must be protected. Overly dense housing not consistent with that preservation.
Living in Desert Vistas subdivision since it's existence 15yrs ago has been an absolute blessing and we expect to
keep it that way. With that, we enjoy hiking, biking and walking frequently all year around. Over time the
"preserve" area has seen a HUGE increase in vehicles, accidents, speeding, crime, pollution & noise to name just
a few. Our understanding has always been that no further housing/development of any kind would continue
past our subdivision into the Sonoran Preserve. That certainly did not happen. Sonoran Desert Drive is so busy
NOW that adding additional housing will not only threaten people but the natural terrain and wildlife habitat.
That's a resounding NO WAY!
I hike and trail run in the preserve at least five times a week since I live within walking distance to the Vista
trailhead. It is a beautiful and relaxing and meditative time for me believe it should be left as is like, as I
understand the story, the original owner wanted it to stay, which I agree with.
Becasue we hike the trails regularly and the feeling of being lost in nature so close to home is special. It should
be protected and I hope my daughter can enjoy it the same way one day.
We moved here from Wisconsin almost 4 years ago. 100% the reason we selected to live up here in the North
valley was because of the Sonoran preserve. We chose to not be inside the 101 on purpose.please don't allow
the Sonoran desert drive and beautiful desert around it to be taken over with cars and traffic.
Page 1287
Cycling and hiking in the area
Since living in Phoenix this has been a place where I can get away to escape the noise of the city. Please don’t
take that away from us. For a lot of people, having a place to get away to is vital to every day life.
We need to preserve the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve.
Arizona is growing too rapidly for its own good. The demand for water is only going to increase with these
unnecessary expansions. Destroying the natural habitats of the wildlife that surrounds is also harmful to the
already damaged ecosystem. There is no necessity to continue to tear up the desert to accommodate an exodus
of out of state buyers. They can find a more sustainable environment to live, Arizona is already overly populated
and adding excessive traffic flow to an underdeveloped part of the city is asinine. Keep Arizona wild.
I live less then a mile away and it’s a beautiful area that should remain the way it is. We hike, bike, and drive to
grandparents house on this beautiful road/preserve. Please let it stay beautiful and let us continue to make
memories here.
We moved up to this area because of the beauty of the Sonoran Preserve. Please keep our beautiful land the
way it is.
As someone who regularly drives, hikes, and bikes this area, it’s important to me, my family, my community,
and Phoenix at large to protect these kind of “open/brown/green spaces”. There are plenty of places around
Phoenix for development ‐ the Sonoran Preserve should not be one of them.
Maintain the beauty and areas to hike.
I run and cycle on the parkway and traffic is already dangerous, especially near the passing zones. I also hike
extensively and if many more houses are built, the views will become less spectacular than they are now. In
addition, wildlife would be affected by overdevelopment
I and my family moved to this area to enjoy the preserve. While we understand there is growth in the area, it
was done under the rules and regulations set forth. I would ask that all builders comply.
We use the preserve for hiking and horseback riding. Heavy traffic volume can create a hazard for horses, even
at a distance.
I travel Sonoran Desert Drive every day because I live right off of it. It is a beautiful drive, but also one that is
very serene and peaceful. I am concerned that allowing the Verdin community to be built at the requested
density it will cause a great impact and stress to the drive through the Preserve. Even if the road is expanded to
more lanes, this road will become a dangerous route for the bikers and hikers in the area, not to mention the
drivers. Please do not allow the density for this new community as requested!
1. There has been poor oversight with planning roadways to keep up with the existing development in the
Sonoran area. 2. Sonoran Desert Drive is supposed to be a scenic drive and is utilized by many cyclists and has a
gorgeous walking path. The increase win traffic will be a further danger to cyclists and pedestrians. 3. Many of
us have to keep moving further and further out of the city to get away from all the Phoenix traffic and live in a
peaceful community. The existing planning with the “water project” has been a nightmare with construction and
took 8 months to complete. We already have problems with adequate water in our area and other areas of
Phoenix area under water restrictions. Where is all the water going to come from to support all of these houses.
5. Schools are already overcrowded and there is already a problem with staffing for school buses and teachers.
How are we going to support an increase of additional kids and families when we cannot support the ones
already living here adequately?
I love being able to enjoy the beautiful preserve without all the traffic. The preserve is what makes city living do‐
Page 1288
I have lived at this address for 20 years and have watched the area grow. My wife and I have hiked and biked in
the Sonoran Preserve area hundreds of times, and now we have introduced our children to a love of nature
through seeing Olive the owl on Hawk's Nest Trail and wildflower blooms biking along the Apache Wash trail. In
the middle of a growing city, this Preserve is an oasis that allows residents from near and far to relax and escape
the pace of city life. It magically transports visitors to a place that feels quiet and free. Please help us preserve
this for us and future visitors!
Traffic, keep the beautiful desert, water resources
The infrastructure is not setup for a development of this size and the tax payers shouldn’t bear the cost to
We have 2 parks there, we need to connect these parks. People live here for the openness of the land. We need
more open spaces, not more house's.
Please preserve this pristine piece of Sonoran Desert for the native flora and fauna and for our future
My family lives in Sonoran Foothills. We chose this beautiful area because of the gorgeous desert preserve. We
love our out of the way pocket and want to protect the gorgeous pristine desert from further development.
I live in the neighborhood and don’t want them to change our desert look it’s very important
The development will increase the footprint traffic and damage to these natural areas and habits. We must look
forward to responsible growth in unity with our surroundings and not just perceived revenues.
I am an avid hiker. I enjoy being able to see nature, plants and animals. We are already taking so much natural
habitat from desert life. Overcrowding the preserve area increases pollution by humans and their machines.
Furthermore, light and noise pollution create additional issues. Please conserve our preserve.
As local residents, my family loves to hike at the Apache wash trailhead and the trails behind Sonoran
foothills/Fireside. My family’s Christmas pictures have been taken in the surrounding desert for years. All the
surrounding neighbors have the desert overlay, which is more important than ever with the water shortage in
Phoenix. If you plant the appropriate trees, cactus etc., NO WATER IRRIGATION is needed. Our trees were
watered deep for the first two years, then turned off. 15 years after NO WATER, beautiful and thriving. You have
my address, drive on by. PLEASE keep the beautiful desert overlay our Sonoran Preserve deserves.
I live on the South‐West edge of the Sonoran Preserve. I am an avid outdoors person that loves the wild flora
and fauna and am concerned about destroying the natural beauty of the preserve as well as the natural habitat
of wild life. I believe that we need to prevent this oasis for recreation and wild life refuge to be altered.
I moved to this house 10 years ago to move out of the “city” and be near desert‐stop building so much up here!
We cannot keep moving the wild habitat out of their homes! Moving into this community we were told this
reserve was here to stay so we would never have to worry about build going up on it ‐ clearly, that has changed.
Do not let greed destroy our quality of life.
This is a beautiful scenic preserve that has already experienced housing growth, wild fires caused by humans,
and an increase in traffic. We have lived in this area for 15 years and specifically love that it used to be quiet and
just outside of the city. No thank you to further developments! Preserve the land, wildlife, and natural growth!
Love the beauty that this area brings to all.
I've lived on the north side of town my entire life and thr natural desert is why I continue to live away from the
noisy city. The Sonoran preserve has protection in place to conserve the natural environment and this
development is threatening that protection for the sake of the American dollar. We live up here for the wide
open space, peace and quiet, uninterrupted views and opportunity to enjoy nature. The traffic that's started to
grow is threatening this with speeders flying by at 70+MPH, endangering bikers, walkers and nature. Please do
now allow for more development than this preserve can handle and do not threaten the natural ecosystem by
We back up to Dove Valley.....the traffic has already increased exponentially over the past few years and people
use this road as a freeway....safety for our kids and everyone in our community is a huge concern.
Page 1289
I live in the Sonoran desert north of Phoenix, Don’t want it destroyed by continuing building. Leave it in it’s
natural state, so we can enjoy the desert for generations please .
I live on Dove Valley and the traffic is already horrendous. We also love driving "the back way" when we're
headed to Scottsdale for the scenic route. We would hate to see that go and hate for it to be filled with more
homes than are currently allowed (none would be the perfect amount in my opinion). The schools are already
far too filled for the existing amount of homes and the roads were not built for the amount of traffic that
currently passes through on a daily basis. There are so many reasons to not allow more homes!! We moved up
here to be away from the millions that live in metro and we'd like to keep it that way.
I enjoy hiking and biking in the area. Houses and cars really ruin the beauty of it.
Please do not overcrowd our area and stress our resources. Sonoran Desert Drive is beautiful and offers
wonderful opportunity to be outside and healthy. Please preserve this area.
Me and my family and friends are all avid trail runners with great respect for our wildlife and natural
ecosystems. I don’t dispute the need for housing but the Desert Character Overlay District put the standards in
place for exactly this reason ‐ to prevent developers from overdevelopment that would ruin the NATURAL
ecosystem. I applaud them for some of the measures they propose in planning but that will never make up for
any zoning change and quite frankly is hypocritical. Please make sure Verdin complies with the current standard
I will not vote for an elected official that allows this to happen
This area is important to us as we hike and bike. Knowing that preserve will always be here made buying our
home easy. We would like for all development to mind and take care of our desert spaces. There is a reason
the Desert Character Overlay District was created. To ignore this would be a tragedy.
Too much traffic. Dangerous to have additional traffic where lots of bikers use the bike path. Why not build on
the other side of 17 instead of near the preserve. Help of wildlife not be pushed out even more.
Taking away the sceneries wildlife and open park trails to enjoy. Once you start building gets crowded needing
more wider roads taking away from the above
Safe and beautiful area to hike and bike.
As a local real estate agent, I understand the need for more housing in the metro area. But there are many
other locations that are not in the middle of a preserve. Outdoor recreation and the beauty of the Sonoran
Desert are reasons why people relocate to the area or purchase vacation homes. Having the preserve remain a
preserve and not another housing project is vital to our community.
Being surrounded by the Sonoran Desert Preserve is probably the biggest reason that we built the house that
we live in now. It is just so beautiful to be able to drive home after a long day's work and enjoy God's creation at
it's finest. It is truly breathtaking and spectacular. Many people flock to Apache Wash Trailhead recreational
area to enjoy this beautiful natural setting through hiking and mountain biking. It would be a travesty to
overpopulate this area and ruin the enjoyment of the preserve for generations to come. It just wouldn't be the
same. Not to mention the destruction of the natural habitat of so many desert creatures that make the preserve
their home. I witness this first hand while living in the Sonoran Gate Community. These animals do not deserve
to be displaced and have their homes destroyed. The line has to be drawn somewhere in order to maintain a
level of natural beauty in our urban areas. This seems like as good a time as any to make a conscious decision to
halt the human encroachment on the habitat of all of God's innocent creatures and keep this little slice of
My family and I love to hike this area, especially to feel like we’re away from city life and enjoying the natural
outdoors. That is one of the reasons why we chose to live in this area was because of the preserve.
We moved up to this area to enjoy the beauty and tranquility of the area. Now it is being threatened. We
moved up to this area to see our beautiful dessert in its natural habit, and now it's being threatened. We moved
up here because it was a great dream come true, and now that dream is again being threatened by those
wishing to make many dollars off the land and environment that belongs to us all. Please, please let's stop this
travesty. Thanks for reading my input. We just so love it up here and hope for no more growth and
Keep population down to preserve the wildlife
Page 1290
This road is a quick north valley traffic bypass that remains somewhat traffic free for now. There is great hiking
and desert views. For profit expansion in this area would destroy that.
We specifically moved to this area b/c of the preserve and the peacefulness that it brings to our lives and
neighborhood. District guidelines are in place for a reason and should not be adjusted for a greedy developer.
I think the peace and quiet and a safe place for the Sonoran wildlife to roam freely is vital. We cannot keep
pushing these animals out of there natural habitats. Traffic on Sonoran desert drive has already increased and
to increase it more is simply careless as families riding bikes will be at an increased risk
The Sonoran Preserve is beautiful Natural landscape that keeps the heat down vs concrete, provides
opportunities for walking, hiking, biking ect. Many of the residents in this area including myself moved up here
due to these walking and hiking trails. Also, the traffic on Sonoran Desert drive is already bad and adding more
homes will only make it worse. Please listen to the residents and save the Sonoran Preserve.
The drive along Sonoran Desert Drive is very relaxing and calming. I enjoy hiking and I would like it to remain a
desert oasis to enjoy.
Would cause an overpopulated area that is meant to be preserved for nature. Would ruin hiking and biking do
to the amount of traffic and would become dangerous. Would effect the views and the ability for people enjoy
the scenery. Would also effect the wildlife pushing the coyotes and javelinas into residential areas. Which they
belong in the desert.
Beauty of the natural desert provides peace & tranquility in this world of unrest. Don’t destroy the zen
My family and I enjoy biking and hiking in that area, which is part of the reason we live where we do. We believe
the City of Phoenix made a informed and important decision to maintain the wilderness, beauty and safety of
that area for a reason and would hate to see that decision overturned.
Hiking and the overall access to the outdoors
It is one of the most beautiful areas of the valley. Please dont spoil it.
The Sonoran Desert Drive is a beautiful natural area that needs to be preserved for future generations. There
are plenty of other places to develop closer to the I‐17
We live in this area for its natural beauty and we do not want to lose that.
I bought the house for privacy and quietness. The sound from the cars already are a issue, the amount of
roadkill is brutal and water shortages have began. Taylor morrison has so many issues with the houses in
Sonoran gate , they are not prepared for this project. Pollution and traffic is just not right in this area. Why
wouldn't they build on the area on cave creek road. It's open, houses have no issues. This seems the state is
taking money to push this project through. Who's paying for the roads and why would you put a road up by the
state hiking trails. This ruins the landscape !
Please adhere to the Desert Character Overlay District safeguards. We need space to walk, bike, play and enjoy
the natural beauty of the desert.
I feel that they are over building in Phoenix. Have limited water supply. The traffic is already congested and
difficult to around.
I love where I live and the traffic is manageable. The mountains and hiking trails are beautiful and right now
there’s congestion when I hike with bicyclists and hikers. More people would make hiking and the outdoors
troublesome for parking and just hiking the trails.
I grew up in cave creek which is right on the other side and I know the value to this desert landscape and the
peace it brings to others. It’s natures playground let it be
Preserving the open space, flora, and fauna native to the area
The natural desert is one of the most unique places and somehow we have to realize it is something we cannot
afford to destroy. I understand the need for homes and such, but please leave this area be. Please!
Keep the desert the desert and keeping it natural where I bike and hike
Page 1291
I love driving on the Sonora Desert Dr. and seeing our beautiful desert. I and my family members also enjoy
hiking and biking on the trails.
Keep the beauty and peacefulness of this special area. Protect wilderness and cyclists. Cut down on traffic. It is a
rare beauty we cannot afford to lose.
My family and I hike at this preserve every week. I take friends to it, have had Girl Scout events, and even
volunteer to clean up the trails. It is one of the most gorgeous gems in Phoenix. In addition to that, numerous
animals call it their home. It is not ok to take that away from the people of Phoenix.
My family hikes and mountain bikes several times per week on these trails. We truly appreciate this land and
would not want its inhabitants to be disrupted any further than they already are.
I'm mainly just concerned with the increased amount of traffic new housing developments will create.
The development that is already out there detracts from the natural environment immensely. Additional
development will only make this worse. Build elsewhere...just not here please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The desert is slowly vanishing which breaks my heart. The Sonoran Preserve should be as it is titled “PRESERVE
This area can not support anymore homes. We don’t have the commercial needed. Also, we need to preserve
the desert. That is a popular scenic drive and hiking area.
It was designed to be protected. It is that simple. There is already too many cars going through that preserve.
Natural beauty
My family and I enjoy walking, hiking, and driving by the preserve and the planned Verdin development on a
daily basis. It is a highlight of our day and one of the only areas in Phoenix that people can enjoy the natural
beauty of the desert, because it maintains the desert character overlay. It would be very disheartening if this
beautiful surrounding area loses its desert character. I trust that members of the Phoenix city council will reject
the request to maintain the desert character overlay. Thank you.
The volume of traffic is already out of control on Sonoran Desert Drive. Please keep the Sonoran Preserve as it
Already getting too crowded in the area. And the desert preserve is in jeopardy.
It is a beautiful preserve that holds opportunity to connect with nature, and allow us all in the valley to have
natural habitat for wildlife and flora and fauna that are so important to keeping the integrity of our great state.
Concerned about too much growth and traffic. Moved up here in 2005 for the beautiful open Sonoran Desert.
Absolutely do not want to see that all developed ‐ we do not need anymore housing or apartments.
All of the building is already over done. It's taking away any part of the beauty left in the area. My family does
alot of biking and hiking in that area and it doesn't need to be ruined with more structures. Leave AZ alone and
stop overtaking anything left. The traffic is insane. Why do we need more of it in the area?! That drive is one of
the last drives left near by that is ALMOST untouched.
As a native of AZ, north Phoenix particularly, I’ve seen the increase in population boom over the last 20 years.
The traffic, noise, crowds are destroying the natural beauty and peacefulness of N Phx. Also… the water! Where
will all the water come from to sustain such a population? We don’t want to end up like Anthem!!
Beautiful hiking area and bike riding.
Beauty, Congestion, MTB trails
Being able to walk , enjoying the beautiful landscape the LORD make.
Congestion. Rezoning opens doors to more rezoning. Will cost the county money to widen roads. And I like less
people around.
Destroying the beauty and traffic concerns.
Destroying the beauty, and traffic concerns.
Greg Laursen
I am concerned about the increase in traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley roads. I would like to see
this portion of the desert remain protected.
Page 1292
I am concerned about the volume of cars, traffic and safety. There have already been fatal accidents for
motorists and bicyclists on that road/area. I am concerned about ruining the integrity of the beautiful Sonoran
Preserve. PLEASE don’t let this happen!!
I am extremely concerned about over building at the expense of the natural desert. Loss of natural
settings/habitat, increased traffic, speeding, congestion, crime, burglary, all the issues that come with high
I am signing this petition for multiple reasons ‐ we do not have the proper roadways to support additional
housing units and want to preserve the beauty of the region
I believe it is vital to preserve the Sonoran desert lands. The more we build the more we push wild life out of
their habitats and into neighborhoods where they inevitably will get injured or killed. If we keep building on
these lands we won't be the Sonoran desert anymore, we will just have to explain to our grandkids what the
Sonoran desert once looked like.
I do not want the massive increase in traffic it is already horrible in this area. We do not need more housing
there are plenty already being built.
I don’t want to see traffic increase. I would like to see the desert stay peaceful and empty.
I enjoy taking hikes with my family and dog. It is so wonderful to get out of the city and neighborhood to
experience nature. We also enjoy taking our bikes along the Sonoran Desert Drive to safely ride without traffic
and congestion. I do not want to lose this ability to development. There are so many other areas available for
development without jeopardizing the beauty that is preserved in this area.
I frequent the Sonoran Preserve 2‐3 times a week and my husband road bikes 4‐5 times a week in the bike
lanes. We enjoy being able to go enjoy the desert without having to see home after home. We are also in a
drought and putting more homes up does not help address the issue. Please think about keeping more open
spaces for everyone to enjoy who already lives here it is getting crowded enough.
I go hiking there to appreciate the natural beauty of the Sonoran desert and the breathtaking views of the
McDowell Mountains and Boulders of Carefree etc.One if the last pristine places to go up here in the N Valley .I
do not want more housing subdivisions and apartment buildings obstructing the views along with more traffic
congestion coming from the constant relentless overbuilding of housing presently occurring .Please save this
beautiful,natural corridor which is used for hiking and biking along with the equestrian trails for horseback
riding.Please allow local residents a sacred piece of land to cherish for us now as well as the generations to
come ,we need somewhere to go that we can take pride in .The Natural beauty of our desert lands is what drew
me to the area 42 years ago please Preserve it!!
I have lived in this area for 17 yrs. and we are raising our daughters here. My family enjoys the trails and hiking. I
am also a teacher at on of the neighborhood K‐8 schools. Our school is busting at the seams even before all the
new construction being completed. You can't keep overloading the schools and roads to crisis points.
I hike the preserve almost every day, year round. Exponential increases in large commercial trucks and
unforced city and state (ARS 28‐955) traffic laws related to excessive noise ruin the wild experience of North
Phoenix' best attraction. When the city pushed Dove Valley Road through the desert 10 years ago, I was a
member of the Sonoran Citizens Improvement Association. At Phoenix City Council meetings I brought up the
noise issue and stated that the city will never enforce the noise statutes on the books, because the police were
over worked and had more important issues ton deal with. An that was 10 years ago before the defend the
police movement decimated law enforcement moral. 10 years ago, City Council told me not to worry, noise
issues would be addressed. I knew it wasn't true a decade ago. And I have sadly been proven right. The city
needs to finish the Sonoran Desert Drive extension off the 303 as per MAG and the city's (so far) empty
promises from a decade ago. I have a long memory. And I vote. https://sonorancitizens.wordpress.com/
I like living in the city with a place to go(the preserve) where you feel like the city is so far away. I hike, mountain
bike and enjoy seeing the wildlife as well as nature in general.
I live in the area and my family and I walk, bike, and hike in the preserve daily. I also see all the animals who live
in and rely on the preserve.
Page 1293
I love all the preserved open desert. If there are rules and guidelines already established for a certain amount of
homes built, we need to stay within that, and stop over building whenever a builder wants to cram more homes
I moved here because of the nature. I grew up in the country and this was as close to it as I could get. I love the
nature and the quiet that we all paid premium dollar for as well
I moved here to get away from the high volume of homes and traffic in Gilbert and to enjoy the beautiful
surrounding desert trails and nature paths north and south of Sonoran Desert / Dove Valley.
I often go hiking in the preserve for the peacefulness, seeing wildlife, and being surrounded by nature. I bike ride
along Sonoran desert drive and feel safe due to very little traffic. I will be devastated if homes get built on our
beautiful preserve. Animals will suffer, people will suffer, and preserve plant life will be killed. This should not
happen. Preserve means preserve!
I purchased my home in Sonoran Foothills in 2010 primarily because of the desert character overlay and how
the neighborhood blends in with the natural surroundings. I moved to this area because of the desert character
and would like it to stay that way as it expands.
I spend a great deal of time hiking and biking there. The north valley is quickly being developed and it would be
nice to at least have this area remain what it was intended to be…a preserve. Thank you
I understand that growth is inevitable, but we need to be smart about it. There needs to be a balance of large
homes, apartments, and smaller homes. There have been hundreds of apartment spaces built west of this area
and the increase in traffic has been considerable in the past 5 years. I urge the council to consider keeping this
balance on the north end of the city.
I use the area all the time for hike, bike and great out doors
I use the area weekly running and hiking. It is a beautiful diverse area with wildlife and plant life. Also concerning
is water shortages. The area needs to be preserved.
I use this area for cycling and running. Additional congestion will make it unsafe for these activities. We are
losing more and more areas where it is safe for recreation. The preserve provides safe space for recreation and
adds value in its current state to the residents of the Phoenix metro area.
I very much enjoy the drive through there. Traffic has already increased too much as it is.
I want to continue enjoying walking and biking along the Sonora Desert preserve in a pleasant and safe way.
I want to keep it as is so that we all can enjoy the area and keep the daily traffic down.
I wish to preserve the Sonara Preserve as it is and prevent the reckless encroachment by developers to rob the
community of this precious resource we all enjoy.
I would like to preserve what we have in our area and community!!
I'm mountain bike in the Sonoran preserve 3 to 4 times per week and feel it is vitally important to keep some
space set aside with minimal traffic and housing.
It is a beautiful community! I love seeing people rude their bikes, walk, hike, ride atvs so close by but with more
housing it becomes impossible to enjoy the preserve. Save the last piece of Arizona the beautiful desert and wild
life in Phoenix!
It is important that we preserve our land to make it available to enjoy the outside life without the traffic.
It is my training ground. I spend countless hours a week there riding in the bike lane, running on designated
sidewalks & trails. It is regarded, by local athletes, as a safe stretch of road to cycle on due to the generous bike
lane and limited traffic entering/exiting Sonoran Desert Dr.
It’s nature. Beautiful parts of the valley have already been ruined by housing projects. This shouldn’t be another
I've lived in this area for the last 3+ years and a major reason we moved here is because of the desert setting
and because it didn't feel as crowded as other parts of the Valley. Sad to see our beautiful preserve turned into
crappy track homes.
Keep the beauty of the desert and keep traffic minimal on Sonoran Desert Drive as there are no crossroads to
take as an alternate route if traffic is heavy on Sonoran Desert Drive.
Keep the desert!!! One of the reasons why I love where I live is the Sonoran preserve!!!!
Page 1294
Keeping natural habitats for the animals that belong here. We are on their land and need to be cognizant of
that. Also, future generations need to be able to enjoy nature as it is meant to be.
Keeping the natural desert habitat is better for the environment.
Leave the desert un touched
Living in the area I regularly hike and bike in the preserve with my family and do not want to see it get overrun
with more housing developments. Additionally Dove Valley is already very congested, I want to preserve our
desert, Phoenix in general has a water issue, and most importantly the schools in this area are already over
My family and I value the Sonoran Preserve and open desert. We've lived next to and used the Sonoran
Preserve for over 15 years. We mountain bike, run, hike, and enjoy nature on these trails multiple times per
week. The surrounding open desert is an integral element contributing to the peace of the Preserve. We were
dismayed at the building of the neighborhood off Dove Valley Rd between the two sections of the Preserve a
few years ago. Please do not crowd the area surrounding and within the beautiful Preserve!
Original safeguards put in place by longtime developers who created the Preserve and associated housing
(Sunbelt Construction). They balanced the housing needs with need to create liveable areas that honored the
fragile desert. This request for increased density is about money and is unnecessary for a profitable develoment
effort. Everyone needs to get paid for their work, including developers, but respect for the fragile ecosystem
and desired lifestyle in the north valley is also required. Profits are fine and were factored into the original deal.
People already speed like crazy on this road and I'm afraid accidents will go up
Please don’t let greedy developers have their way!
Please preserve the natural beauty of the Sonoran Desert. It is irreplaceable!! The proposed excessive
development will permanently destroy the beauty of this desert!!
Please stop encouraging overgrowth. We do not have sufficient resources for the population growth. Let the
desert live. There should not be such things as zoning changes that crowd people and houses into areas to allow
developers to make money and walk away.
Please! We must protect our desert land. For the animals, the plantation, the beauty.
Preserve‐ should be just that preserve. Preserve the natural Sonoran desert as much as possible. This
development would not only take away so much of our desert beauty but also the wildlife habitats & wildlife
would be greatly affected.
Preserving more of the natural landscape is important. The Apache wash recreation area is a beautiful way to
experience nature and enjoy the area. More homes bring more cars and traffic and noise pollution, disturbing
the natural habitat. There are so few places left to enjoy nature and leave it beautiful. We don’t need more
homes there.
Preserving natural areas and wildlife
Proposed area would block the migration of wildlife through the preserve which is likely its originally intended
purpose. Also, there is not enough water already….
Sara Rovarino
Save the preserve
That is a protected place that we need to take care as part of our lungs we need good air, we have so many
houses, why we need to destroy the habitat of a lot of animals.
The beauty of living in Phoenix is having the ability to have open spaces for not only the wildlife but also the
citizens to use the land the way it was intended. There are plenty of other places to build and expand without
overcrowding the desert areas.
The city of Phoenix is running out of desert space because of so many large communities. Taking away the
beautiful desert or desert character overlay to add more concrete and asphalt among houses is deeply
concerning for Phoenicians, tourists, and the wildlife in the area.
The drive through the preserve is truly a beautiful drive. With more houses comes more traffic which will take
away from the beauty and wildlife of the preserve. It is called a preserve for a reason.
Page 1295
The entire N Phoenix area cannot accommodate this influx of new homes without increasing law enforcement
and fixing the road grid. The city needs to be proactive, not reactive.
The natural landscape of the Sonoran Desert must be preserved so that all may enjoy its true beauty and the
rewards of living in the desert. It takes courage and decisive action to prioritize the natural land over
development yet it is a gift you provide to countless generations. Protecting the preserve is action toward a
meaningful legacy. Please honor the desert preserve and say no to more development in this rare and special
area of Phoenix. With hope and gratitude, Krystal Mazzola Wood
The open space is becoming g increasingly scarce, reducing not only the lands for recreation but also the
The Sonoran desert preserve is admired for its standing beauty. Arizona is Home to tons of desert land scenery
that makes our cave creek town so special. Please preserve this land and build soemewhere else
The Sonoran Preserve is truly the most incredible place to hike, bike, and just enjoy the beautiful desert. Just
driving through brings my family so much peace. For it to be surrounded by dense development and traffic
would steal the joy it brings from to the whole community, as well as visitors who are lucky enough to see some
of our most spectacular views.
There has already been enough building along Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert Drive. Please leave the preserve so
that we can continue to enjoy its beauty.
There have been to many accidents and deaths.
This area is vital for wildlife and preserving the bike trails be able to trail ride in the unspoiled desert we don’t
need anymore traffic thru here it would completely ruin the whole area
This desert area is beautiful and with more and more houses being built, this will reduce the amount of natural
preserve we have to enjoy. I love to hike in this area.
This is a great place to hike and enjoy the beautiful desert landscape. The city planners and council are ruining
the desert plus there is no thought of water shortage when these zoning changes are made.
This is a safe place to bike and hike. The balloons are beautiful to watch there. Let’s keep the open space
This is an important area to keep Phoenix as special as it is. In addition, the growing drought crisis makes the
option of further building less eco friendly.
This pristine desert area should not be developed, it needs to be PROTECTED.
This proposed change in zoning will allow new development that will infringe on our recreational area. Zoning is
there for a reason. Please do not change it.
This stretch of road is the safest and most beautiful stretches of uninterrupted roads for cycling in the valley.
Please save it
To be able to get out of the city and experience the peacefulness and beauty of the Sonoran desert so easily is
what makes this area unique. Once it is gone it is gone.
To destroy nature in order to build more homes is wrong. We are speaking for all the animals that currently call
the Sonoran Preserve home.
To preserve the beauty and conservation of the area, as well as safety for cyclist and hikers.
Traffic along Sonoran Desert Drive and Dove Valley is already becoming a major problem. Increased traffic will
make for a dangerous situation for cyclists riding in the bike lanes. Also, the increased density of homes directly
against the road will affect the desert nature of the area.
Upon moving to my home in Sonoran Commons I was told all this state land would stay undeveloped. That was
a key factor in purchasing my home because I love the drive, but most importantly Hiking and biking. It was very
disappointing when the Taylor Morrison community built where I was told no homes would be and increasing
more homes and traffic would be disappointing not to mention destroy the sonoran desert further. Please do
not allow this to happen!
Walking along the Sonora preserve desert in a safe manner is very important for my kids
Page 1296
We are homeowners in Tatum Highlands and use the beautiful Sonoran Desert Drive to get to one of our
favorite hiking areas, Apache Wash Trail. It is vitally important both ecologically and aesthetically to maintain
the Desert Overlay Plan to keep this remarkable Arizona treasure intact with low density, one story, blended
into the environment, natural colors, and with great respect of the surrounding preserve. The developer’s
existing project just to the west on Sonoran Desert Drive is an example of the opposite of this‐ homes close
together, no subtle and natural build character, no boundaries between homes, no blending with the Sonoran
Desert landscape. Sticks out while on the drive or hiking the Preserve rather than disappearing/tastefully
blending in. This is very concerning and must not be duplicated in any way. Please retain the existing Desert
Overlay Plan to maintain the incredible Sonoran Preserve. Thank you Councilman Waring and all city council
members. Respectfully submitted, Laurie Foster
We are loosing preserve land left and right. We need to keep the preserve the way it is. Plus not to mention all
the traffic and extra water for all these new builds.
We are loosing the beauty that was one of the huge reasons for moving where we live. All you are you doing is
bringing more infrastructure. I understand that growth needs to take place but I think that it should be done in a
much better way. Putting up a bunch of houses on top of each other is not the solution. I see greed takes the
upper hand over more intelligent decisions. Thank you
We chose this part of Phoenix when we moved from out of state because of the open desert and what that
offered, little traffic, and less people in general. In just 4 short years we are seeing things change for the
negative…reminding us of overdevelopment we experienced in the East San Francisco Bay Area.
Overdevelopment that led to traffic issues and overcrowded schools, just to name a couple problems. We don’t
want to see these same mistakes take place in our new home. And we don’t want to lose the beautiful open
We have a young family and love to hike which is why we moved to this area. If we don’t stop this, it will
destroy the area and wildlife.
We have already encroached & displaced our very important desert wildlife, my hope is to prevent further
destruction of our desert ecosystem. I enjoy hiking, less pollution, nature and safety within our preserve. Please
keep it that way.
We have so few Desert Lands left for generations to appreciate
We hike and drive through here for mental health. Please don’t fill more desert preserves with homes and
commercial property.
We love the natural area of Sonoran Preserve! Adding more homes is going to take away the beauty of this land.
We cannot allow new developments to destroy our desert.
We moved here to not be so close to continued urbanization. We utilize the preserves regularly for hiking,
biking, and running.
We moved to this area because of the beauty of the preserve and the desert areas around us. The area is
already congested with traffic and adding more subdivisions will just clog our streets, increase pollution,
displace animals and ruin the desert. Please do not let that happen.
We must preserve the natural beauty of Arizona. The generations to come deserve to see the natural beauty
that we have today. It is also home to many of Gods creatures and sustains their lives.
We need to have open space to enjoy hikes, trails, horizon visibility. We do not want the Preserve to turn into a
asphalt map.
We need to stop doing things for the sake of the bottom line. We have destroyed enough of our natural
environment for the sake of exploitation, and disregarding something that has been set in place creates a
precedent for this to continue arbitrarily. People move their families to areas like this because of the
environment around them. If we wanted to live in the middle of the city, we would live in the middle of the city.
Allowing this to continue will greatly reduce and diminish the purpose & meaning of preserved & protected
land, as well as the ability by which we are able to enjoy it in it’s natural form ‐ mitigating the full purpose
Page 1297
We truly need to preserve our Sonoran Desert and we need to maintain the original reason this area has been
preserved. We are rapidly losing our Sonoran Desert and our recreation areas, not to mention our wildlife are
losing their homes. We can’t be nothing but concrete. We should take pride in living in a beautiful part of town.
Please Preserve!!
we use it weekly for hiking and dog walking please please don't ruin this!
We want to preserve the natural beauty and opportunities we have now to bike, hike and pleasant walking with
families and friends while enjoying the beauty of our Sonoran Desert. So please don’t grant permission to build
more housing communities.
When does this stop? We have a responsibility to our next generation of children to save our desert for them to
enjoy. Take the building elsewhere. PRESERVE what is left of our precious desert
Would like this preserved with desert lands as much as possible
Page 1298
Page 1299
Page 1300
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Item *172) (Ordinance S-48899)
Ordinance S-48899 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-13.
*172 ***REQUEST TO ADD-ON (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)***
Payment Ordinance for Blue Ridge Fire District
For $10,113.19 for annual payment authority for Blue Ridge Fire District
to provide fire protection and/or EMS services to City-owned property in
Coconino County for the Fire Department. The City-owned property,
known as Camp Colley, is identified by Coconino County Assessor Parcel
Number 40312001.
Page 1301
Page 1302
Report
Ordinance S-48899 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-13.
*172 ***REQUEST TO ADD-ON (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)***
Payment Ordinance for Blue Ridge Fire District
For $10,113.19 for annual payment authority for Blue Ridge Fire District
to provide fire protection and/or EMS services to City-owned property in
Coconino County for the Fire Department. The City-owned property,
known as Camp Colley, is identified by Coconino County Assessor Parcel
Number 40312001.
Page 1301
Page 1302
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
***REQUEST TO ADD-ON (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Payment Ordinance for
Summer Recess (S-48900)
The request is prepared each fiscal year end to allow for continuance of operations
during the annual Council summer recess.
Summary
Request to authorize the City Controller to disburse funds, not to exceed $100,000 per
vendor, per occurrence, arising or otherwise due and payable during the period
commencing on July 1, 2022 through August 30, 2022, for the purpose of continuing
payment authority for expenditure of public money for payment of claims against the
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer, the Chief Financial
Officer and the City Controller.
Page 1303
Page 1304
Report
Summer Recess (S-48900)
The request is prepared each fiscal year end to allow for continuance of operations
during the annual Council summer recess.
Summary
Request to authorize the City Controller to disburse funds, not to exceed $100,000 per
vendor, per occurrence, arising or otherwise due and payable during the period
commencing on July 1, 2022 through August 30, 2022, for the purpose of continuing
payment authority for expenditure of public money for payment of claims against the
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer, the Chief Financial
Officer and the City Controller.
Page 1303
Page 1304
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
***REQUEST TO ADD-ON (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Amend Ordinance S-45435
Regarding Pediatric Health Care Initiative Fund (S-48898)
Request to amend Ordinance S-45435 to remove the requirement that donations
made to the Pediatric Health Care Initiative Fund be returned to the donor if not
transferred to the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) "within
ninety (90) days of the receipt of a donation."
Summary
Ordinance S-45435, which established the Pediatric Health Care Initiative Fund to
facilitate the transfer of donations for specialized pediatric care provided by
freestanding children's hospitals with 100 beds or more located in the City of Phoenix
to AHCCCS, requires that, if funds are not transferred to AHCCCS within 90 days of
the receipt of the donation, the funds will be returned to the donor. The 90-day
requirement was self-imposed and is not legally required. The requirement has
become problematic in the timing of collection and distribution of donations. All other
terms of the Ordinance will remain the same.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City.
Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-46957, dated May 6, 2020, authorized the City to enter into an
intergovernmental agreement with AHCCCS to implement the provisions of Ordinance
S-45435.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 1305
Page 1306
Report
Regarding Pediatric Health Care Initiative Fund (S-48898)
Request to amend Ordinance S-45435 to remove the requirement that donations
made to the Pediatric Health Care Initiative Fund be returned to the donor if not
transferred to the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) "within
ninety (90) days of the receipt of a donation."
Summary
Ordinance S-45435, which established the Pediatric Health Care Initiative Fund to
facilitate the transfer of donations for specialized pediatric care provided by
freestanding children's hospitals with 100 beds or more located in the City of Phoenix
to AHCCCS, requires that, if funds are not transferred to AHCCCS within 90 days of
the receipt of the donation, the funds will be returned to the donor. The 90-day
requirement was self-imposed and is not legally required. The requirement has
become problematic in the timing of collection and distribution of donations. All other
terms of the Ordinance will remain the same.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City.
Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-46957, dated May 6, 2020, authorized the City to enter into an
intergovernmental agreement with AHCCCS to implement the provisions of Ordinance
S-45435.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 1305
Page 1306
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
***REQUEST TO ADD-ON (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Authorization to Apply for,
Accept, and Enter into an Agreement for the FY 2022 DNA Capacity
Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Grant Program
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the Police
Department to apply for, accept, and enter into an agreement for federal grant funds
through the Bureau of Justice Assistance for the FY 2022 DNA Capacity Enhancement
and Backlog Reduction (Formula) grant program. Further request authorization for the
City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item.
Summary
The Police Department's Laboratory Services Bureau (LSB) has applied for and been
awarded funds through this grant program for several years. This grant funding is to
provide for the processing, recording, screening, and analysis of forensic DNA and/or
DNA database samples. The grant objective is to increase the capacity of public
forensic DNA and DNA database laboratories to process more samples, thereby,
reducing the backlog. All DNA profiles will be entered into the combined DNA Index
System and ultimately, where applicable, uploaded to the National DNA Index System.
If awarded, grant funding will be utilized for forensic scientist overtime, related fringe
benefits, equipment, travel/training, consultants for outsourcing DNA testing, and other
costs to improve the quality and timeliness of forensic DNA analysis. The grant
application is due July 12, 2022.
Contract Term
The contract term will be for two years beginning Oct. 1, 2022 through Sept. 30, 2024.
Financial Impact
Eligible funding amount is $642,670. No matching funds are required. Cost to the City
would be in-kind resources only.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 1307
Page 1308
Accept, and Enter into an Agreement for the FY 2022 DNA Capacity
Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Grant Program
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the Police
Department to apply for, accept, and enter into an agreement for federal grant funds
through the Bureau of Justice Assistance for the FY 2022 DNA Capacity Enhancement
and Backlog Reduction (Formula) grant program. Further request authorization for the
City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item.
Summary
The Police Department's Laboratory Services Bureau (LSB) has applied for and been
awarded funds through this grant program for several years. This grant funding is to
provide for the processing, recording, screening, and analysis of forensic DNA and/or
DNA database samples. The grant objective is to increase the capacity of public
forensic DNA and DNA database laboratories to process more samples, thereby,
reducing the backlog. All DNA profiles will be entered into the combined DNA Index
System and ultimately, where applicable, uploaded to the National DNA Index System.
If awarded, grant funding will be utilized for forensic scientist overtime, related fringe
benefits, equipment, travel/training, consultants for outsourcing DNA testing, and other
costs to improve the quality and timeliness of forensic DNA analysis. The grant
application is due July 12, 2022.
Contract Term
The contract term will be for two years beginning Oct. 1, 2022 through Sept. 30, 2024.
Financial Impact
Eligible funding amount is $642,670. No matching funds are required. Cost to the City
would be in-kind resources only.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.
Page 1307
Page 1308
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
163 item(s)