Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.





ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: September 3, 2025
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Central City Village Planning Committee

I recommend the following for appointment:

Elaine Becherer
Ms. Becherer is the Director of the Office of Enterprise Planning at Arizona State
University and a resident of District 4. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire September
3, 2027.

Citizens Transportation Commission

I recommend the following for reappointment:

Sanjay Paul
Mr. Paul will serve his second term to expire June 30, 2028.

Deer Valley Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Debra Stark recommends the following for appointment:

Leon Thomas
Mr. Thomas is a Resource Advisor at the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and a
resident of District 3. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire September 3, 2027.




Military Veterans Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Elizabeth Powers
Ms. Powers is the Government Affairs Coordinator for the West Coast at Axon and a
resident of District 8. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire September 3, 2028.







Report

Liquor License - Odin's Hall Meadery - District 1

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 353678.

Summary

Applicant
Mathew Howard, Agent

License Type
Series 1 - In-State Producer

Location
519 W. Lone Cactus Drive, Ste. 301
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a wine and mead in-state producer. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit. This business has plans to open in October 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 14, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration my be given only to the applicant's personal
qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,



grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am of strong and good character including, coaching my Son's little league teams to
build qualities in youth that last into adulthood, I am not an alcohol abuser and as such
I have a clear standard with regard to responsible alcohol use and how to responsibly
serve others. I am respected and ethical business owner in the Arizona community. I
have thirty years of management and business ownership experience that will serve
me in the leadership of my company. I adhere to and highly value the compliance and
laws given to us in order to serve our clients with integrity.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - AC Element Hotel Phoenix North Norterra - District 1

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 349894.

Summary

Applicant
Lani Baker, Agent

License Type
Series 11 - Hotel

Location
25100 N. 22nd Lane
Zoning Classification: PUD
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a hotel. This location was not previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business is
currently under construction with plans to open in October 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 8, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the



State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Home2 By Hilton Phoenix Midtown + Tru By Hilton Phoenix Midtown (Series 7)
3150 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 17
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a controlling person on AZ liquor license 07070028609 for Home2 by Hilton
Phoenix Midtown + Tru by Hilton Phoenix Midtown, 3150 North Central Avenue,
Phoenix, which has operated without incident.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Guests of the hotel appreciate the ability to have a glass of wine or other spirit with
friends and other guests when staying at AC Element Hotel. The requested Series 11 /
Hotel liquor license will meet the needs of guests and ensure they are conveniently
and substantially served on property.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - AC Element Hotel Phoenix North Norterra - Data
Attachment B - AC Element Hotel Phoenix North Norterra - Map






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: AC ELEMENT HOTEL PHOENIX
NORTH NORTERRA
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Liquor Store 9 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 12.15 23.03

Violent Crimes 12.31 1.06 1.8

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 0

Total Violations 69 0


Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6113005 2501 532 70 0

6122001 4064 984 151 151

6122002 3565 894 39 85

6123022 1385 321 30 52

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: AC ELEMENT HOTEL PHOENIX NORTH NORTERRA
25100 N 22ND LN




Date: 8/21/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - The Grove Artisan Cafe and Bakery - District 2

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 353992.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
5415 E. High Street, Ste.103
Zoning Classification: C-2 DRSP
Council District: 2

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 15, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
"We train all of our employees in responsible liquor service. We also conduct regular
audits to ensure they comply.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The Grove Artisan Cafe and Bakery is a locally owned and operated coffee shop
dedicated to serving exceptional coffee, artisan breads, fresh pastries, and
handcrafted sandwiches. We pride ourselves on offering a warm, welcoming space
where neighbors can gather, connect, and enjoy quality food and drink made with
care.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - The Grove Artisan Cafe and Bakery - Data
Attachment B - The Grove Artisan Cafe and Bakery - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: THE GROVE ARTISAN CAFE AND
BAKERY
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 12 9

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 3

Liquor Store 9 3 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 3

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 31 25


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 49.81 35.98

Violent Crimes 12.31 3.13 2.97
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 0

Total Violations 69 0




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6152011 656 0 41 20

6152012 6102 515 722 1020

6152022 84 50 30 0

6152023 3418 1016 778 112

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: THE GROVE ARTISAN CAFE AND BAKERY
5415 E HIGH ST




Date: 8/12/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Calitacos - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 352641.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
245 E. Bell Road, Ste. A-2
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 9, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Calitacos is a neighborhood restaurant featuring a variety of street tacos, burritos,
tortas, and desserts in a family-friendly environment. Applicant would like to continue
to offer guests 21 and over the opportunity to enjoy alcoholic beverages as an incident
to the meals they enjoy.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Calitacos - Data
Attachment B - Calitacos - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: CALITACOS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 0

Liquor Store 9 4 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 4

Restaurant 12 19 15


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 189.41 433.97

Violent Crimes 12.31 27.73 50.63

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 18

Total Violations 67 31




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1036042 1354 528 26 81

1036043 1478 470 42 168

1036111 1291 377 39 156

1036121 784 0 107 12

1036122 1111 390 23 6

1036123 1454 472 31 63

1036124 2294 0 146 129

6189001 1838 449 37 201

6189004 874 316 24 62

6189005 1135 0 61 125

6191001 2154 34 133 374

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: CALITACOS
245 E BELL RD




Date: 7/21/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Cancer Support Community Arizona (October 4,
2025) - District 4

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Kayla Vucinich

Location
360 E. Palm Lane
Council District: 4

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 4, 2025 - 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 300 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Cancer Support Community Arizona (November
1, 2025) - District 4

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Kayla Vucinich

Location
360 E. Palm Lane
Council District: 4

Function
Dinner and Dance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
November 1, 2025 - 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 350 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Teamsters Local 104 - District 4

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Dawn Schumann

Location
1202 W. Encanto Boulevard
Council District: 4

Function
Picnic

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
November 15, 2025 - 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. / 2,500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - SS. Simon & Jude Cathedral Phoenix - District 5

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Erica Pulliam

Location
6351 N. 27th Avenue
Council District: 5

Function
Fall Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 26, 2025 - Noon to 7 p.m. / 500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Madison District Educational Foundation, Inc. -
District 6

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Margaret Dodd

Location
5601 N. 16th Street
Council District: 6

Function
Music and Food

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
September 20, 2025 - 6 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. / 500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Headliners Sports Grill - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 352174.

Summary

Applicant
Amy Nations, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4142 E. Chandler Boulevard, Ste. 105
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 6, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“New owner is an experienced business operator that has other successful
businesses. The owner has attended basic and management liquor training. The
employees will attend liquor training to ensure compliance with liquor laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location has been a neighborhood favorite for many years. It has had a liquor
license for many years as well. We would like to continue to offer the same great food,
drinks, entertainment, and great people our neighbors have come to expect.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Headliners Sports Grill - Data
Attachment B - Headliners Sports Grill - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: HEADLINERS SPORTS GRILL
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 3

Restaurant 12 22 13


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 52.7 61.46

Violent Crimes 12.31 6.82 11.88

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 0 0

Total Violations 0 0




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1167121 2305 158 156 168

1167122 1955 502 15 223

1167131 630 237 90 72

1167133 1151 453 10 60

1167135 1294 312 29 156

1167191 1868 555 17 106

1167194 1373 576 7 92

1167202 1180 172 41 380

1167203 1429 320 66 89

1167212 1598 640 51 0

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: HEADLINERS SPORTS GRILL
4142 E CHANDLER BLVD




Date: 7/14/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Smidge Beverage Co. - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 349900.

Summary

Applicant
Adam O'Connor, Agent

License Type
Series 4 - Wholesaler

Location
1755 S. 75th Avenue, Ste. 125
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a wholesaler. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 5, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes: information about any
liquor license violations on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control
and, for locations within the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for
police service within the last 12 months for the address listed.

Smidge Beverage Co. (Series 4)
2440 W. Lincoln Street, Ste. 160 A-B, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 3



Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for alcohol sales and
service and is committed to uphold all laws and regulations.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Circle K Store #3384 - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 352493.

Summary

Applicant
Maria Burgess, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
9106 W. Lower Buckeye Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 7

This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a liquor
store. This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an
interim permit. This business is currently being remodeled with plans to open in April
2026.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 15, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona



This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
One letter protesting the issuance of this license has been received and is on file in the
Office of the City Clerk. The letter is from a local resident. The resident does not
support the issuance of the license because they feel that it will bring increased traffic,
noise and light pollution, and crime to the area. Additionally, it is near a school and the
resident is concerned about unknown consequences that could negatively impact the
neighborhood.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Circle K requires all store personnel to attend an in-house training program. This
training is designed to provide a safe and positive customer service environment. As
part of the Circle K training program, we provide an Alcohol Training Program that
meets the requirements of the Arizona Department of Liquor License Control.
Employees must pass a test on Techniques of Alcohol Management that becomes part
their employee file. Store Managers are required to attend additional in-house training
and obtain certification from the Arizona Department of Liquor License Control. This
certification requires submission of fingerprints and includes background investigation.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It is Circle K's objective to provide a product, accessible in a convenient manner that
meets the need of the surrounding community. Circle K's success depends on us
being able to provide products that are in demand.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff gave careful consideration to the protest letter received, however after reviewing
the application in its entirety staff is recommending approval of this application, noting
the applicant must resolve any pending City of Phoenix building and zoning
requirements, and be in compliance with the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachment A - Circle K Store #3384 - Data
Attachment B - Circle K Store #3384 - Map



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: CIRCLE K STORE #3384
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Liquor Store 9 1 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 0

Restaurant 12 4 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 44.05 48.3

Violent Crimes 12.31 7.45 9.97
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 12

Total Violations 69 12



Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

0822041 4129 587 27 251

0822043 1777 335 21 249

0822051 2585 470 27 152

0822061 1137 275 6 32

0822063 2128 395 7 257

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: CIRCLE K STORE #3384
9106 W LOWER BUCKEYE RD




Date: 8/20/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Golden Oak Barbecue & Taproom - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 350585.

Summary

Applicant
David Valencia, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1326 N. Central Avenue, Ste. 101
Zoning Classification: DTC - Downtown Gateway
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 8, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations



on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Oro Brewing Company (Series 7)
210 W. Main Street, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I currently hold a liquor license at my other business in Downtown Mesa. We, as
ownership have about 20 years of hospitality experience operating establishments.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Our barbecue & taproom concept will enhance the dining experience to the downtown
phoenix area.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Golden Oak Barbecue & Taproom - Data
Attachment B - Golden Oak Barbecue & Taproom - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Soluna Eats - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 351016.

Summary

Applicant
Ashante Roberson, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1325 Grand Avenue, Ste. 6
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol consumption.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 12, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I posses the capability, reliability and qualification to hold a liquor license due to my
strong background in food and beverage operations, consistent adherence to health
and safety regulations and a proven track record as a responsible business owner. My
business, Soluna Eats is committed to upholding high operational standards while
creating a culturally rich an inclusive dining experience for the community.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The issuance of a liquor license will allow us to offer responsibly curated wine, beer
and culturally inspired cocktails that enhances our guests' dining experience. This will
aid in attracting more patrons to the area supporting surrounding businesses and
contributing to the local economy. It also supports the growing demand for culturally
authentic and responsibly operated dining establishments. Our establishment will
serve as a welcoming and safe environment that celebrates diversity, wellness and the
spirit of Phoenix."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Soluna Eats - Data
Attachment B - Soluna Eats - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.

Liquor License Data: SOLUNA EATS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 3 1

Wholesaler 4 1 1

Government 5 3 0

Bar 6 22 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 6 1

Liquor Store 9 2 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 5

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 44 7

Club 14 1 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 184.73 180.78

Violent Crimes 12.31 60.66 48.08
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 0 0

Total Violations 0 0




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1129001 1399 521 53 62

1129002 671 102 83 94

1129003 1168 99 40 80

1129004 1279 82 91 706

1130001 2898 331 199 515

1130002 1364 179 221 139

1131001 1929 146 155 743

1143011 911 80 49 374

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: SOLUNA EATS
1325 GRAND AVE




Date: 7/15/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Latino Pride Alliance - District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Steve Gallardo

Location
113 N. 6th Street
Council District: 8

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 4, 2025 - 4 p.m. to Midnight / 1,500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Hilton Garden Inn Phoenix Airport North - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 351436.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 11 - Hotel

Location
3838 E. Van Buren Street
Zoning Classification: C-3 H-R TOD-2
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a hotel. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 12, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards to maintain compliance
with applicable laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Applicant will manage Hilton Garden Inn Phoenix Airport North, which is a popular
hotel amongst business and personal travelers in the heart of downtown Phoenix.
Applicant would like to continue to offer alcoholic beverages to its guests 21 and over.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Hilton Garden Inn Phoenix Airport North - Data
Attachment B - Hilton Garden Inn Phoenix Airport North - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: HILTON GARDEN INN PHOENIX
AIRPORT NORTH
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Bar 6 5 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1

Conveyance 8 2 0

Liquor Store 9 2 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 12 2

Hotel 11 7 3

Restaurant 12 2 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 133.3 106.47

Violent Crimes 12.31 33.65 27.17

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 80

Total Violations 69 143




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1136012 0 0 0 0

1136013 1957 169 53 158

1136021 1780 123 44 346

1136022 2420 344 29 366

1137022 1711 178 13 580

1138004 423 0 13 74

1138005 290 2 35 220

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: HILTON GARDEN INN PHOENIX AIRPORT NORTH
3838 E VAN BUREN ST




Date: 8/15/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Hilton Garden Inn Phoenix Airport North Market - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 351418.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
3838 E. Van Buren Street
Zoning Classification: C-3 H-R TOD-2
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store located within a hotel.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 13, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards to maintain compliance
with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the techniques of legal and
responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Applicant will manage the Hilton Garden Inn Phoenix Airport North Market, which
offers food, beverage, souvenir and personal items for its hotel guests to purchase.
Applicant would like to continue to offer beer and wine to customers 21 and over for
purchase in its hotel market.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Hilton Garden Inn Phoenix Airport North Market - Data
Attachment B - Hilton Garden Inn Phoenix Airport North Market - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: HILTON GARDEN INN PHOENIX
AIRPORT NORTH MARKET
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Bar 6 5 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1

Conveyance 8 2 0

Liquor Store 9 2 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 12 2

Hotel 11 7 3

Restaurant 12 2 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 133.3 106.47

Violent Crimes 12.31 33.65 27.17

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 82

Total Violations 69 147




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1136012 0 0 0 0

1136013 1957 169 53 158

1136021 1780 123 44 346

1136022 2420 344 29 366

1137022 1711 178 13 580

1138004 423 0 13 74

1138005 290 2 35 220

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: HILTON GARDEN INN PHOENIX AIRPORT
3838 E VAN BUREN
NORTH MARKET




Date: 8/11/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Prime Now/Amazon Fresh - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 353920.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
500 S. 48th Street
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a liquor store. This location is currently
licensed for liquor sales with a Series 9 - Liquor Store, liquor license and does not
have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 13, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the



State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Prime Now/Amazon Fresh (Series 9)
500 S. 48th Street, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 16
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards to maintain compliance
with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the techniques of legal and
rsponsible alcohol sales.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Applicant currently operates with a series 9 liquor license at this location; only one
license will be active at a time. Applicant will continue to meet the needs of the
community with responsible sales and delivery of alcohol to customers 21 and over.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Prime Now/Amazon Fresh - Data
Attachment B - Prime Now/Amazon Fresh - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.



Liquor License Data: PRIME NOW/ AMAZON FRESH
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Bar 6 3 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 2 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 3 0

Hotel 11 4 0

Restaurant 12 1 1



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 60.74 8.7

Violent Crimes 12.31 11.51 1.16

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 0

Total Violations 69 0




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1138001 0 0 0 0

1138003 247 0 131 89

1138004 423 0 13 74

1138006 0 0 1 0

3197101 2430 204 126 722

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: PRIME NOW/ AMAZON FRESH
500 S 48TH ST




Date: 8/12/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

EMS Technology Solutions, LLC

For $85,460 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about October 1,
2025, for a term of five years, for the Operative IQ Narcotics Tracking Module software
as well as barcode printers, mobile device optical scanner, supply of labels and
training for the Fire Department. The Operative IQ Narcotics Tracking Module and
equipment will enhance the Fire Department's security measures surrounding
controlled medications, improve detailed record-keeping of inventory levels and avoid
member discrepancies to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations.








Report

Maricopa Association of Governments

For $235,368 in payment authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26, Maricopa Association of
Governments (MAG) membership dues and assessments for the Office of Government
Relations, Public Works, Water Services, Human Services, and Homelessness
Solutions departments. MAG is a Council of Governments and Metropolitan Planning
Organization that provides regional planning and policy decisions in areas of
transportation, air quality, and human services for the Metropolitan Phoenix area and
the neighboring urbanized areas in Pinal County, containing the Town of Florence and
City of Maricopa.








Report

National League of Cities

For $51,410 in payment authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 annual membership dues for
the City of Phoenix. The National League of Cities (NLC) is an organization focused on
strengthening local government. NLC provides training, educational programs and
conferences. City officials have access to information and publications on federal
regulations, solutions to problems, and future challenges. The City benefits from the
NLC's efforts to ensure that local governments have influence in the White House,
United States Congress, and other federal agencies.








Report

Parks and Recreation Event-Related Services, Activities and Games

For $60,000 in payment authority to rent and secure event-related services, activities
and games for various community events, beginning September 1, 2025, through
December 31, 2025, hosted by the Parks and Recreation Department. These services
support seasonal public events across multiple City parks and facilities, which include,
but are not limited to; the rental of rides, games, and bounce houses, face painting,
staging, live entertainment, and other various related services. These events are
designed to provide safe, family-friendly recreation opportunities that promote
community engagement and cultural enrichment for residents of all ages.








Report

Settlement of Claim(s) Arizmendi Andrade v. City of Phoenix

To make an additional payment of up to $7,300 in settlement of claim(s) in Arizmendi
Andrade v. City of Phoenix, 23-0584-001, GL, PD, for the Finance Department
pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of a water main break
claim involving the Water Services Department that occurred on January 5, 2024.








Report

Settlement of Claim(s) Hamilton v. City of Phoenix

To make payment of up to $40,000 in settlement of claim(s) in Hamilton v. City of
Phoenix, 22-1237-004, AU, BI, for the Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City
Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of an automobile accident claim involving the
Police Department that occurred on May 12, 2023.








Report

Settlement of Claim(s) Siqueiros v. City of Phoenix

To make payment of up to $150,000 in settlement of claim(s) in Siqueiros v. City of
Phoenix, CV2023-054369, 22-1225-00, AU, BI, for the Finance Department pursuant
to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of an auto accident claim
involving the Police Department that occurred on November 30, 2022.








Report

Proposed Rancho Grande Annexation - Authorization to File - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to file with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office a blank petition for a proposed annexation. This
annexation was requested by M. Brennan Ray with the Ray Law Firm for the purpose
of receiving City of Phoenix services. The proposed annexation conforms to current
City policies and complies with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-471 regarding
annexation.

Summary
Signatures on the proposed annexation petition shall not be obtained for a waiting
period of 30 days after filing the blank petition with the Maricopa County Recorder.
Additionally, a Public Hearing will be scheduled within this 30-day waiting period,
permitting the City Council to gather community input regarding the annexation
proposal. Formal adoption of this proposed annexation will be considered at a later
date.

Location
The proposed annexation area includes Parcels 104-83-014, 104-83-015, 104-83-016,
and 104-83-017, located in the vicinity of 67th Avenue and Baseline Road (
Attachment A). The annexation area is approximately 18.75 acres (0.0293 square
miles) and the population estimate is 8.1 individuals.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





ATTACHMENT A




Legal Description
For
Lots 7-10
Rancho Grande Uno
Located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 1 East, Gila and Salt
River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona.

Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Rancho Grande Uno, according to the plat of record in the office of the
Maricopa County recorder, Arizona in Book 144 of Maps, Page 12. Being described as follows:

Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 36;

Thence North 90°00’00” West, along the South line of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of
1,323.87 feet;

Thence departing said South line, North 00°00’00” East, a distance of 55.00 feet to the Southwest
Quarter of said Lot 7 and the Point of Beginning;

Thence North 00°49'38" West, along the West line of said Lot 7, a distance of 967.25 feet to the
Northwest corner thereof;

Thence South 89°54'42" East, along the North line of said Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, a distance of
845.23 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 10;

Thence South 00°50'13" East, along the East line of said Lot 10, a distance of 965.95 feet to the
Southeast corner thereof;

Thence North 90°00’00” West, along the South line of said Lots 10, 9, 8 and 7, a distance of
845.37 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Containing 816,967.26 square feet or 18.75 acres, more or less.




LAVEEN FARMS - UNIT 2
BK. 769, PG. 9, M.C.R.
LOT 187 LOT 186 LOT 185 LOT 184 LOT 183 LOT 182 LOT 181

TRACT H TRACT H




N0° 50' 33"W(M) N0°48'46"W(R) 2637.36'(M) 2637.33'(R)
S89° 54' 42"E 845.23'




N0° 49' 38"W 967.25'
LOT 6 LOT 11




S0° 50' 13"E 965.95'
RANCHO GRANDE UNO
LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 RANCHO GRANDE UNO




67TH AVE.
BK. 144, PG. 12, M.C.R. BK. 144, PG. 12, M.C.R.




POINT OF BEGINNING
N0° 00' 00"E
55.00' N90° 00' 00"W 845.37'
1307.22' 1323.87'
N90° 00' 00"E 2631.09'(M) 2630.30'(R)
S 1/4 COR. SEC. 36 BASELINE ROAD
SE COR. SEC. 36
T 1 N., R 1 E. T 1 N., R 1 E.
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT



N e
re
d Land
F I CA T E
S
u




Plotted: 02/18/25 - 1:03 PM, By: mragsdale
TERRASCAPE
t TI N
s CE
R
O
rv
Re g i 48943
eyo
.

Mitchell H. r
Ragsdale .
Da
te
2/18/25. ..
Si . .
AR g ne d . .
N.T.S. I ZO .A
NA U . S




EXHIBIT
LOTS 7-10




File: M:\1726_NexMetro_67th and Baseline_Phoenix\Survey\1726_EXH_Lots 7-10.dwg, ---> EXH
BK. 144, PG. 12, M.C.R.
645 E. MISSOURI AVE., STE. 420 AVILLA MERIDIAN
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85012 CITY OF PHOENIX
Project No. 1726 Date : 2/18/25
Sheet 1 of 1



Report

Acceptance of an Easement for Drainage Purposes (Ordinance S-52243) -
District 3

Request for the City Council to accept an easement for drainage purposes; further
ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via separate
recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement
MCR: 20250404952
Applicant and Grantor: New Promise Christian Fellowship; its successor and assigns
Date: July 15, 2025
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 12851 N. 19th Avenue
APN: 159-03-006A
File: FN 250047
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Acceptance and Dedication of Easements for Public Utility Purposes (Ordinance
S-52244) - Districts 7 & 8

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements for public utility
purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via
separate recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
MCR: 20250404957
Applicant and Grantor: 42nd Street Creta, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: July 15, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 521 W. Tamarisk Street
APN: 113-29-043C
File: 240067
Council District: 7

Easement (b)
MCR: 20250414157
Applicant and Grantor: Armando Martinez; its successor and assigns
Date: July 18, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 821 E. Apollo Road
APN: 114-25-038B
File: 250053
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.





Report

Authorization to License City-owned Real Property Near the 83rd and Southern
Avenues Alignments for a Climate Station to the Arizona Department of Forestry
and Fire Management (Ordinance S-52238) - Out of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a 10-year
License Agreement with the Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management
(DFFM) to utilize a portion of unimproved City-owned land located in Tolleson, Arizona,
near the intersection of 83rd and Southern avenues (if extended) for a Remote
Automated Weather Station.

Summary
The DFFM will utilize approximately 100 square feet of City-owned vacant land located
near the northeast corner of 83rd and Southern avenues in Tolleson, AZ. DFFM
intends to install, operate and maintain a Remote Automated Weather Station (the
Station). The Station, and other similar sites, will assist DFFM in producing predictive
service integral to wildland fire management and risk assessment.

DFFM shall submit all plans for new equipment installation, upgrades, and fence
installation for approval to the Wastewater Engineering and Construction Management
team prior to seeking required permits.

The term of the license is 10 years beginning September 1, 2025, with two five-year
options to extend. Due to the regulatory nature of the use and its public purpose,
payment for the license is waived. DFFM will be responsible for all utility services and
all costs related to operation and maintenance of the Station. Licensee will provide
insurance and indemnification acceptable to the City's Risk Management Division and
Law Department.

The license may be cancelled pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 38-511, or either
party may cancel upon 60 days prior written notice. The license may contain other
terms and conditions deemed necessary by the City.

Contract Term
The term of the License Agreement is 10 years, beginning September 1, 2025, with
two five-year options to extend.




Location
North of the northeast corner of 83rd and Southern avenues if each were extended,
Tolleson, AZ.
District: Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services and Finance departments.








Report

Mediator Pool Contracts - RFQu 24-0393 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52251)
- Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Avril Hogan Coaching and Mediation, LLC and Marlee Raible to provide professional
mediation services for the Office of Accountability and Transparency (OAT). Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
total value of the contracts will not exceed $300,000.

Summary
The mission of the Office of Accountability and Transparency (OAT) is to review
Phoenix Police Department administrative investigations, commendations and
complaints about the Phoenix Police Department. These contracts will provide the City
with professional mediators to be utilized by OAT to conduct impartial mediation and
assist in the mediation process of complaints received by OAT and eligible for OAT's
voluntary mediation program. The contractors will provide services including the
following: facilitating conversations, using mediation techniques between complainants
and members of the Phoenix Police Department, collecting post-mediation
evaluations, and participating in training specific to mediating complaints involving
police and civilians.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL).

Six offerors submitted qualifications and all were deemed to be responsive and
responsible. An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the
following minimum qualifications:
· Qualifications - 0 - 350 points
· Experience - 0 - 350 points
· Capability - 0 - 300 points

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommended award to the
following offerors:
Avril Hogan Coaching and Mediation, LLC, 750 points


Marlee Raible, 750 points

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about September 15, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $300,000. Funding is available in
the Office of Accountability and Transparency's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Office of
Accountability and Transparency.








Report

Buy-Up Voluntary Vision Plan - RFP HR 20-108 - Amendment (Ordinance S-
52235) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 152983 with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company dba MetLife to extend
contract term. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. No additional funds are needed; request to continue using
Ordinance S-46807.

Summary
This contract will provide optional vision insurance that employees may elect. The
premiums are fully paid by the employee through payroll deduction. It may be desired
by employees who do not enroll in the medical plans that include vision coverage, or it
can be used as a supplemental benefit by employees enrolled in the medical plans.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract will be extended through December 31, 2026.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $15,000,000, and no additional
funds are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Buy-Up Voluntary Vision Plan - Contract 152983 (Ordinance S-46807) June 24,
2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Human
Resources Department.








Report

Worker's Compensation Bill Review Services Contract - RFP 24-0436 - Request
for Award (Ordinance S-52237) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Corvel Healthcare Corporation to provide Worker's Compensation Bill Review Services
for the Human Resources Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed
$9,000,000.

Summary
This contract will provide Worker's Compensation Bill Review Services, which will
include review and re-pricing of medical bills and payments for City employees who
have sustained an injury arising out of or in the course of performing their job duties
while employed with the City. The City's Human Resources Department Safety
Division is responsible for managing a full range of workforce services to include
oversight of the Worker's Compensation program. The Worker's Compensation section
has an overall mission to support care of industrial injury benefits under the Worker's
Compensation program for City employees.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Six vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An evaluation
committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria with a
maximum possible point total of 1,000:

· Qualifications, Experience and References (0-300 points)
· Method of Approach (0-375 points)
· Pricing (0-325 points)





After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:

· Corvel Healthcare Corporation

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about January 1, 2026, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $9,000,000. Funding is available in the
Worker's Compensation Trust Fund.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Human
Resources Department.








Report

Electronic Monitoring Products & Services (Home Detention Program) Contract -
COOP 26-0080 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52234) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Sentinel Offender Services, LLC to provide Electronic Monitoring Products & Services
for the Law Department. A cooperative contract was established by the State of
Arizona under contract CTR073944. There is no financial impact to the City's General
Fund.

Summary
This contract is used by the Law Department's Home Detention Program to provide
electronic monitoring as permitted by Arizona law and City code. This program is an
ongoing, existing program that was authorized by the Phoenix City Council in 2004
(P.C.C. § 2-100) as an alternative to jail for many misdemeanor, first offenses, and first
and second DUI offenses. Since its inception, this program has monitored over 16,000
offenders. The beneficial impact of this program allows the City to avoid incurred costs
that is otherwise required when offenders are housed in a jail/detention facility.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Alternative Competition. The City has a contract (156439) via a
cooperative agreement. The Department is requesting to move from the current
contract as the underlying master agreement is expired and enter into a new
agreement under contract CTR073944 to avoid interruption of services.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about September 3, 2025, and will continue through
December 13, 2026, with four one-year options to extend.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City's General Fund and all financial responsibility is
directly between the offender and Sentinel Services, LLC.





Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.








Report

Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Gaming Grant (Ordinance S-52246)
- Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for and accept up to
$477,000 in new funding from the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community under
the 2026 funding cycle. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept
and the City Controller to disburse funds as directed by the Salt River Pima-Maricopa
Indian Community in connection with these grants.

Summary
The Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 12 Percent Gaming grant application
process is by invitation only. The tribe will select and identify which municipalities and
local non-profits to invite to apply for funding consideration. An invitation to apply is not
a guarantee that the application will be selected for funding by the tribe. Salt River
Pima-Maricopa Indian Community does not consider multi-year capital campaign
projects.

If awarded, the funds would be applied, as directed by Salt River Pima-Maricopa
Indian Community, towards the following:

City Application
· Office of Arts and Culture, S'edav Va'aki (formerly Pueblo Grande) Museum:
$242,000 for the continuation and renovation of the main gallery exhibit. The
Museum is committed to providing the best visitor experience possible, which
includes updated and relevant information about the pre-contact inhabitants of the
Salt River Valley, their descendants currently residing in the Salt River Pima
Maricopa Indian Community and the Gila River Indian Community, and connections
to the history and development of Phoenix. Over the last three years, with previous
grant funding, the Museum has renovated both main galleries and with stakeholder
and Tribal consultation, have created a new interpretive vision and exhibit plan.
Funding will provide the opportunity to create interactive exhibit elements,
reproduction artifacts (in place of those objects that Tribal partners have requested
to no longer be exhibited), videos, text panels with graphic elements, including
original artwork where necessary, custom object mounts, to ensure the safety of
certain artifacts, and gallery hardware, video screen, section dividers,


tables/counters for interactive elements and benches.

Non-Profit Applications
· Arizona Humane Society: $85,000 for the Pet Resource Center and Emergency
Medical Technicians, which are two of their most essential, people-centered
programs. These departments directly strengthen public safety and social service
outcomes by supporting vulnerable Maricopa County residents facing financial
hardship, housing instability, or other crises that impact their ability to care for a pet.
Funding will sustain these critical services, ensuring continued access to humane,
community-based interventions that align with the community's priorities.
· Native American Connections (NAC): $150,000 for permanent supportive housing
operations for five housing sites with a total of 335 residential units and a
management and direct care staff of 35. Permanent supportive housing sites serve
chronically homeless, disabled, minimal income residents and offer intensive case
management, with low case load ratios, and wraparound services. These five
housing sites grew out of NAC's work as a non-profit Urban Indian Organization
striving to maintain a continuum of culturally competent services for Native
American clients and residents.

The gaming compact entered into by the State of Arizona and various tribes calls for
12 percent of gaming revenue to be contributed to cities, towns, and counties for
government services that benefit the public, including public safety, mitigation of
impacts of gaming, and promotion of commerce and economic development. The Salt
River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community will notify the City, by resolution of the Tribal
Council, if it desires to convey to the City or nonprofit a portion of its annual 12 percent
local revenue-sharing contribution.

Financial Impact
There is no budgetary impact to the City and no general-purpose funds are required.
Entities that receive gaming grants are responsible for the management of those
funds.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Office of Government
Relations.








Report

Transfer of Retirement Funds to Arizona State Retirement System (Ordinance S-
52239) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to transfer retirement funds for
Morgan Mucha in the amount of $12,228.23 to the Arizona State Retirement System.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse the funds.

Summary
Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, Sections 38-730 and 38-322, retirement service
credits for former members of the City of Phoenix Employees' Retirement System
(COPERS) may be transferred to the Arizona State Retirement System upon approval
by the City Council. The following former City of Phoenix employee has requested
transfer of the balance of her credited service:

· Mucha, Morgan: $12,228.23

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was approved by the COPERS Board at the August 7, 2025 meeting.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Retirement
Office.








Report

Transfer of Retirement Funds to Arizona State Retirement System (Ordinance S-
52240) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to transfer retirement funds for
Elizabeth Thompson in the amount of $48,719.95 to the Arizona State Retirement
System. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse the funds.

Summary
Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, Sections 38-730 and 38-322, retirement service
credits for former members of the City of Phoenix Employees' Retirement System
(COPERS) may be transferred to the Arizona State Retirement System upon approval
by the City Council. The following former City of Phoenix employee has requested
transfer of the balance of her credited service:

· Thompson, Elizabeth: $48,719.95

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was approved by the COPERS Board at the August 7, 2025 meeting.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Retirement
Office.








Report

Intergovernmental Agreement Amendment with Arizona State University and its
Rob and Melani Walton Sustainability Solutions Service for Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Inventories (Ordinance S-52250) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Intergovernmental
Agreement No. 156928 with the Arizona State University Rob and Melani Walton
Sustainability Solution Service to conduct Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories for
City operations and community-wide for the year 2024 and to update previous
inventories. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The aggregate expenditures of this amendment will not exceed
$113,000.

Summary
The Office of Environmental Programs (OEP) is proposing to amend an existing
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona State University Rob and Melani
Walton Sustainability Solutions Service (ASU) for consultant services to calculate 2024
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions based on most recent available data. ASU has
conducted GHG inventories for City operations and community-wide since 2012. ASU
reviews the data provided by the City and measures emission reductions to track the
City’s progress on meeting its GHG reduction goals. OEP conducts GHG inventories
every two years.

The scope of this IGA is to update the municipal operations and community GHG
emissions inventories with calendar year 2024 data. Additionally, the scope has been
expanded to update the existing GHG emissions inventories to allow for the City to
compare GHG emissions across all previous inventories. By executing this IGA
amendment, OEP will have the capability to engage ASU as needed to help calculate
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions as part of updating the Climate Action Plan in the
fall of 2025.

Contract Term
The term of the IGA is from August 15, 2022 through August 14, 2026. The GHG
inventory work included in the amendment will be completed prior to August 14, 2026.





Financial Impact
The aggregate expenditures of this agreement amendment will not exceed $113,000.
Funding is available in the Office of Environmental Programs from Air Quality/Climate
general funds.

Previous Council Action
The City Council previously approved:
· On March 23, 2022, the City Council approved the original Intergovernmental
Agreement. (Ordinance S-48402)
· On November 1, 2023, the City Council approved an amendment to increase
budget and expand the Scope of Work to include the 2022 Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Inventories. (Ordinance S-47588)

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Office of
Environmental Programs.








Report

Amend Ordinance S-52177 for Senior Bridge Project (Ordinance S-52253) -
District 8 & Citywide

Request authorization for the City Manager or the City Manager's designee to amend
Ordinance S-52177 to increase funding in an amount not to exceed $750,000 to
support the Senior Bridge Affordable Housing Project. Further request the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item for the life of the contract.

Summary
The City of Phoenix is contributing $750,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
interest funds to bridge a financial gap in the Senior Bridge Affordable Housing Project.
This funding is in addition to previously authorized funding which includes $6 million
via an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Maricopa County and $3,015,746 via a
funding agreement with the Phoenix Community Development and Investment
Corporation (PCDIC), for a total grant value of up to $9,765,746.

Contract Term
The term of the Contract will remain as stated in the July 2, 2025, Council action.

Financial Impact
Funding in the amount not to exceed $750,000 will be provided through the City’s
allocation of ARPA interest funds. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Council previously reviewed and approved the following:
· On December 18, 2024, the City Council approved the Intergovernmental
Agreement (IGA) with Maricopa County and related projects with Ordinance S-
51553, including the award of up to $6 million in funding from the IGA for the Senior
Bridge to Steel & Spark, LLC with Ordinance S-51553.
· On March 26, 2025, the City Council authorized changes to the Senior Bridge
Project scope and substitution of Senior Bridge, LLC as developer with Ordinance S
-51736.
· On July 2, 2025, the City Council authorized additional changes to Senior Bridge
Project scope and term, and entry into a funding agreement with PCDIC with
Ordinance S-52177 for the Senior Bridge project.



Location
Senior Bridge, 2853 E. Van Buren Street
Council Districts: 8 and Citywide

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Office of
Homeless Solutions.








Report

Bibliotheca, LLC - Library Equipment Maintenance and Support Contract - RFA
25-0688 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52252) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Bibliotheca, LLC, to provide equipment, maintenance and repair services for the
Library Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $3,000,000.

Summary
This contract will provide the library branches with security products, services and
annual maintenance of the existing equipment. The library branches utilize self-check
kiosks and building occupancy management such as radio frequency identification
(RFID) tags, pads and security gates. Bibliotheca security products allow the library to
maintain accurate inventory, manage the check-in/out of all library materials and
provide theft-deterrent capabilities. Ongoing maintenance and support are critical to
ensure system functionality, timely software upgrades and replacement of outdated
equipment. Without this contract, libraries may experience disruptions in core services
such as automated check-in and sorting of books and materials, potentially resulting in
longer wait times, increased manual processing and higher risk of materials being lost
or unavailable to the public. This agreement will help ensure uninterrupted library
operation and continued access to efficient, user-friendly services for the community.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition. Bibliotheca's proprietary hardware and
software support essential functions such as inventory management, check-in/out
processes, and theft deterrence. Only Bibliotheca can maintain this equipment due to
its proprietary nature. Switching providers would necessitate replacing all RFID-based
equipment and retraining staff on a new system, which would be highly disruptive and
costly.




Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about October 1, 2025, for a five-year term with a one-
year option to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $3,000,000 for the aggregate term.
Funding is available in the Library Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.








Report

Playgrounds, Splash Pads, and Outdoor Fitness and Related Equipment -
Contract - COOP 26-0039 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52241) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Dave Bang Associates, Inc. to provide playgrounds, splash pads, and outdoor fitness
and related equipment, as well as repair of such equipment, for citywide departments.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $1,500,000.

Summary
This contract will provide playgrounds, splash pads, outdoor fitness, and related
equipment to enhance and support the quality of recreational programs and services
for Phoenix residents. The contract will also provide repair of such equipment, which is
nearing the end of its lifecycle. This contract is for citywide use and will be primarily
used by the Aviation, Human Services, and the Parks and Recreation Departments.
The Parks and Recreation Department is anticipated to be the largest user of this
contract.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Alternative Competition. The City is a member of Mohave
Educational Services Cooperative (MESC) and this contract was awarded through a
competitive process, consistent with the City's processes, as set forth in Phoenix City
Code Chapter 43. Utilization of this agreement allows the City to benefit from MESC
government pricing and volume discounts.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about February 22, 2026, for a four-year term with a one-
year option to extend.

Financial Impact
The total contract value will not exceed $1,500,000 for the aggregate term. Funding is
available in the various departments' operating budgets.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Gina Montes and John Chan, Interim
Deputy City Manager Amber Williamson and the Aviation, Human Services and Parks
and Recreation departments.








Report

Tillage and Turf Installation Services Contract - PKS-IFB-26-0042 - Request for
Award (Ordinance S-52248) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Andrus Properties Inc. and Turf Equipment Source to provide tillage and turf
installation services for the Parks and Recreation Department. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of
the contracts will not exceed $2,000,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide tillage and turf installation services for the Parks and
Recreation Department for parks and fields throughout the City. These services will
include both scheduled turf installation projects and as-needed soil preparation and
turf replacement at outdoor recreational facilities. The contracts are essential to
ensuring that turf covered areas remain safe, healthy, and adequately maintained for
public use.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative
Regulation 3.10.

Three vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendors:

Selected Bidders
Andrus Properties Inc.
Turf Equipment Source

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about October 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts' value will not exceed $2,000,000.




Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.








Report

One-Stop System Memorandum of Understanding and Infrastructure Funding
Agreement (Ordinance S-52245) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the ARIZONA@WORK City of Phoenix
Workforce System Partners (Partners) on behalf of the Phoenix Business and
Workforce Development Board (Board). The MOU includes an Infrastructure Funding
Agreement (IFA) that outlines the infrastructure and shared costs between the
Partners. The City will receive approximately $784,120 in funds from the Partners
annually to be incorporated into the City's Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
(WIOA) budget. The City will be responsible for expenditures in an amount not to
exceed $2,440,000 over the term of the agreements. Further request authorization for
the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to
this item. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
The Board is a local workforce development board established under WIOA and is
required by the legislation to work with the Chief Elected Official to negotiate and
execute an MOU with all Partners to govern the operation of ARIZONA@WORK Job
Centers and the One-Stop delivery system in Phoenix. The Board developed the MOU
through local discussion and negotiation with the Partners and includes provisions
that:
· Describe how various services will be coordinated and delivered through the One-
Stop delivery system.
· Describe the methods for referring individuals between the Partners.
· Ensure that the One-Stop delivery system is accessible and inclusive.
· Provide a legal and operational framework for the One-Stop system.
· Provide a plan for how the Board and Partners will fund shared costs.

The IFA maintains transparency and accountability in use of funds, and includes
definitions of the following:
· Infrastructure costs: the non-personnel costs necessary for the operation of the
ARIZONA@WORK City of Phoenix Job Centers (comprehensive and affiliate), such
as technology, pre-employment skills assessments, business services, and referrals



to Partners.
· Shared costs: the common operating costs and communal services necessary for
the operation of the ARIZONA@WORK City of Phoenix One-Stop System, such as
the One-Stop Operator, virtual lobby management tool, and Partner co-enrollment
activities.

Shared costs are currently paid solely by the City using WIOA funding. Upon execution
of the MOU/IFA, shared costs will be a joint responsibility from all the Partners and
calculated using the number of full-time employees providing workforce services for
the Partners at One-Stop centers.

The Partners that participated in discussions and negotiations to develop the MOU
include:
· WIOA Title IB Adult, Dislocated Worker, and Youth Programs: City's Human
Services Department, Chicanos Por La Causa, Jewish Family and Children's
Services, Neighborhood Ministries, and the Valley of the Sun YMCA.
· WIOA Title II Adult Education Programs: Arizona Department of Education on behalf
of Arizona Center for Youth Resources, Friendly House, Literacy Phoenix, and Rio
Salado College.
· WIOA Title III Wagner-Peyser Programs: Arizona Department of Economic Security
(DES), Employment Services.
· WIOA Title IV Vocational Rehabilitation: DES, Rehabilitations Services
Administration.
· Senior Community Service Employment Program: AARP Foundation.
· U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: City's Housing Department.
· Trade Adjustment Assistances and Jobs for Veterans State Grants: DES,
Employment Services.

Contract Term
If approved, the three-year term of the MOU/IFA will be effective July 1, 2025 through
June, 30, 2028.

Financial Impact
Funding received from Partners will reimburse the City's WIOA program. The
aggregate value of expenditures to be disbursed through this agreement shall not
exceed $2,440,000. Funding is available from the City's allocation of WIOA federal
grant funds. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was approved at the Phoenix Business and Workforce Development Board


meeting on May 8, 2025.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.








Report

Participation at Consumer Electronics Show (CES 2026) (Ordinance S-52254) -
Citywide

Request to authorize City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to authorize
participation at the 2026 Consumer Electronics Show (CES 2026) in Las Vegas, from
January 6 through 9, 2026. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to
accept funds from participating booth sponsors to offset costs associated with CES
2026 convention expenses, and for the City Controller to disburse funds associated
with this request. The total value of CES 2026 convention efforts will not exceed
$75,000.

Summary
Phoenix first attended CES in 2025 with a delegation of more than 20 members,
including multiple start-ups, established businesses, higher education, and regional
and state partners. These companies received tremendous exposure, including media
attention and secured contacts that have helped them establish funding sources and
new customers. As a U.S. city participant, Phoenix was part of the Global Village,
further establishing the City as a technology-forward community that competes on an
international stage. Significant interest and success from last year's participation has
led Phoenix to pursue attending this global event frequented by over 142,000
attendees last year.

During last year's event, staff attended more than 250 meetings with U.S. and
international companies, many of which are considering expanding or relocating in the
United States. Staff was also able to make connections for existing Phoenix
businesses who are looking for partnership, funding, or collaboration opportunities.
Further, staff presented in several forums that showcased Phoenix as a thriving
technology and entrepreneurial hub to attract companies and skilled workers. The
event provides staff the opportunity to attract new business, secure investments, and
promote the City's innovative ecosystem. This trade show also provides a location to
meet with startups, investors, and Fortune 500 companies in one location, connecting
with decision makers who will determine the next expansion or relocation site for
business.





Phoenix’s continued presence at CES 2026 will help to further strengthen the City’s
reputation as a technology-forward community, while supporting local businesses in
showcasing their products and capabilities. This participation directly aligns with
Phoenix's efforts to attract and expand technology companies, demonstrating why the
City is the premier destination for world-class business. This investment will assist the
Community and Economic Development Department (CEDD) to continue to generate
qualified prospects to create a pipeline of businesses considering expansions and/or
relocations to Phoenix through a multi-faceted marketing approach targeted at high-
wage, high-tech companies.

CES 2026 is focused on AI, Digital Health, Vehicle Technology, and Advanced Air
Mobility, aligning with Phoenix attraction efforts.

Financial Impact
Funding to participate in CES 2026 will not exceed $75,000. Funding is available in the
Community and Economic Development Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.








Report

Lease with M3 Partners, LLC - PCC16-01 - Amendment (Ordinance S-52242) -
Districts 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 152835 with M3 Partners, LLC (M3) to extend the contract term and
continued use of Ordinance S-41926. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer
to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. The
contract is estimated to produce $353,705.68 in revenue to the City over the 10-year
aggregate term.

Summary
This lease is for two UPS Stores that provide necessary services for downtown
Phoenix businesses and Phoenix Convention Center Department (PCCD) clients and
attendees. M3 (Tenant) currently leases approximately 879 square feet of retail space
in the PCCD North Building and 1,627 square feet of retail plus storage space in the
West Building. These UPS stores are an essential resource for PCCD clients, offering
125 mailboxes and a wide range of business and guest services. Having an on-site
UPS store ensures that event organizers, exhibitors, attendees have immediate
access to shipping, receiving, printing, and other logistical services that directly
support PCCD operations and enhance the customer experience. Additionally, it
provides logistical services, support, and amenities to other downtown businesses and
residents. Over the life of the current contract, the store has expanded its amenities to
meet evolving client needs, including copier rental services, mobility scooter rentals,
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant shredding, luggage
check service, and pay-per-use computer rentals. The UPS Store consistently receives
positive feedback from PCCD clients and the downtown community.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the lease will be extended from September 1, 2025, through August
31, 2030, for a five-year term with one, five-year option to extend.

Financial Impact
The Tenant will pay approximately $353,705.68 in revenue to the City, over the
aggregate 10-year extension.




Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Authorization to enter into contract with The UPS Store for retail lease at Phoenix
Convention Center Department Contract 152835 (Ordinance S-41926) on July 1,
2015.

Location
Phoenix Convention Center, 100 N. 3rd Street
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.








Report

Request Authorization to Use Preserve Land at Ludden Mountain Located along
Happy Valley Road and West of 55th Avenue (Ordinance S-52247) - District 1

Request City Council authorization for the use of preserve land at Ludden Mountain,
as legally described in Attachment A, to accommodate improvements associated with
the Happy Valley Road project between 67th and 35th avenues. These improvements
will support essential drainage, trail, and landscaping infrastructure to enhance public
access.

Summary
The Street Transportation Department, in coordination with the Parks and Recreation
Department, is advancing a federally funded improvement project along Happy Valley
Road within a City-owned parcel known as Ludden Mountain, located along Happy
Valley Road and west of 55th Avenue. The project includes drainage improvements, a
multi-use trail, retention basins, landscaping, and a driveway for a potential future
trailhead that will partially encroach on designated preserve property as shown in
Attachment B. Efforts have been made to minimize the impact to the Ludden
Mountain Preserve including inventory and salvage of existing trees and native plants,
and hydroseeding with native plant seed. City Council authorization is required to
permit this use in accordance with City Charter provisions and preserve land
management protocols.

Financial Impact
This action has no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· On June 2, 2021, City Council passed Ordinance S-47648 for Happy Valley Road:
67th to 35th avenues Improvements - Engineering Services - ST85100437.
· On October 27, 2021, City Council passed Ordinance S-48019 for Project
Agreement with Maricopa Association of Governments to Accept and Disburse
Regional Transportation Funds.
· On May 11, 2022, City Council passed Ordinance S-48555 for Acquisition of Real
Property for Roadway Improvements Along West Happy Valley Road from 35th to
67th avenues.
· On July 3, 2023, City Council passed Ordinance S-50067 for Authorization to


Accept and Disburse Legislative Appropriations Transportation Funding for
Roadway Improvements on Happy Valley Road, 67th to 35th avenues.

On March 5, 2025, City Council passed Ordinance S-51687 for Authorization to Accept
and Disburse Funds for Happy Valley Road: 67th to 35th avenues Roadway
Improvements - Design Build Services - ST85100437.

Location
North side of Happy Valley Road between 62nd and 55th avenues.
Council District 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
John Chan and the Street Transportation and Parks and Recreation departments.





ATTACHMENT A
Legal Description
APN 201-38-026

Multi-Use Trail Easement


A MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT BEING A PORTION OF TRACT B AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT OF
"STETSON VALLEY" RECORDED IN BOOK 700 OF MAPS, PAGE 22, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDERS
(M.C.R.) LYING WITHIN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE
GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, CITY OF PHOENIX, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 6, FROM WHICH THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
THEREOF BEARS SOUTH 89°32'28" WEST A DISTANCE OF 4964.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00°30'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THAT
DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON SAID STETSON VALLEY FINAL PLAT;

THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES AND DISTANCES:

THENCE NORTH 89° 52'47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 693.79 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 00°07'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1.60 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89°52'47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 72.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00°07'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1.60 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89°52'47" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 346.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE ACROSS SAID TRACT B THE REMAINING COURSES AND DISTANCES:

THENCE NORTH 44°42'23" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 39.50 FEET;

THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°20'33", A RADIUS OF 87.50
FEET, AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 67.72 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 00°21'50" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 95.01 FEET;

THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51 °53'44", A RADIUS OF 92.50
FEET, AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 83.78 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;

THENCE ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 95 °30'49", A
RADIUS OF 32.50 FEET, AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 54.18 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 43°58'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 63.29 FEET;




THENCE NORTH 61°24'37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 102.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THAT
MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON SAID STETSON VALLEY FINAL PLAT;
THENCE SOUTH 30"53'40" EAST, ACROSS SAID MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT, A DISTANCE OF 25.02 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH 61°24'37" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 43"58' 56" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 59.46 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 95°30'49", A RADIUS OF 7.50 FEET,
AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 12.50 FEET TO A PONT OF REVERSE CURVATURE;
THENCE ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51"53'44", A
RADIUS OF 117.50 FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 106.43 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 00 °21'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 95.01 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°20'33", A RADIUS OF 112.50
FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 87.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 44"42'23" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 14.65 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE
AFOREMENTIONED DRAINAGE EASEMENT;
THENCE SOUTH 89"52'47" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 35.25 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
THE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 12,269 SQUARE FEET OR 0.28 ACRES,
MORE OR LESS, INCLUDING ANY EASEMENTS OF RECORD.




Expires: 3/31/20�




i Table
APN 201•38•024 L i ne# Le� �;h D i recti on
RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA CALCULATIONS
Project No.: ST85100437
& 201-38-026 L1 105.09 Noo· 30' 46"W
L2 2613• 76 S89" 19' 16"W
Happy Valley Road: 67th Avenue to 35th Avenue
Descri ption: --��-�-------------------
L3 60.00 N00" 04' 43"E
Parcel No.: 201-38-024 & 201-29-026 Real Estate No.: 12362 L4 1261_79 N89. 19, 16 .. E
Street Address: N/A L5 5.03 Noo· 00' 00"E
L6 613.94 N89" 19' 23"E
Area of Existing Parcel Area to be Acquired Area Remaining L7 31 _ 11 Noo· 00, oo"E
Type of Acquisition Symbol Sq. Ft. Acres Sq. Ft. Acres Sq. Ft. Acres L8 547_99 N89. 39, 06"E
Existing Parcel 19,252,213 441.97 � � =:><: :>< L9 8.00 soo· 05' 13"W
"O
� FEE R/W �X�X�>' L10 947.26 N89" 39' 06"E
� � =:><: :><
L11
S! DRAINAGE E 337,480 7.75 18,914,733 434.22 344.88 N51" 37' 57"E
�
(')
�/1f/.;
N
� MUTE �""'"\_ 12,269 0.28 19,239,944 441.69 L12 96.13 N90" 00' 00"E
z
LJ.J
c::: Line Table Curve Table L13 95.01 S00" 21' 50"W
�
(') L14 39.50 S44" 42' 23"W
N L i ne# Length
� D i recti on Curve# Delta Rad i us Length Course In
z
LJ.J L15 346-38 S89" 52' 47"W
c::: EL1 63.29 N43" 58' 56"E C1 84"26'29" 32.50 47.90 S5T05'25"E
ci5 L16 1-60 Noo· 07' 13"W
N EL2
102.86 N61" 24' 37"E C2 51·53'44" 92.50 83.78 N89"38'10"W
N L17 72-00 S89" 52' 47"W
� EL3 25.02 S30" 53' 40"E C3 44"20'33" 87.50 67.72 N45"17'37"W
ci 54.18 N38"28'06"E L18 1.5o soo· 07' 13"E
LJ.J EL4 100.03 S61" 24' 37"W C4 95·30'49" 32.50
EL5 7.50 L19 693-79 S89" 52' 47"W
�
c:::
59.46 S43" 58' 56"W C5 95·30'49" 12.50 S46"01'04"E
'6 EL6 L20 238-36 Noo· 08' 50"W
95.01 soo· 21' 50"W C6 51·53'44" 117.50 106.43 S38"28'06"W
& C4 EL 1 EL3
EL7 14.65 S44" 42' 23"W C7 44·20•33" 112.50 87.07 N89"38'10"W C1 --., x.-'--'l- EL4 APN
� L 1 2 -� E LS
� EL8 35 • 25 S89 . 52 , 47 " W .__ __ ...____ ____.___P ROPOS.......___
D
E DRAINAG E ...____ _____. C 5
PA RCEL�I�� _ C2 201-38-026
1l: APN 201_38_024 EAS E M ENT A REA C6
a. ' LIN E v;!-� -�� E L 6
ro ✓ . � /// o/.j P ROPOSED
J: L7 -., #r- L9
L4
LS _ .
- L 6 -. / �a - L 1O . ·-;_ 'l . / ✓, i---__ L 13 MUTE A REA
c.. .,.- / ; / /
::11/, C7
0 M / / / .
(.) 1 / / / / · / / / ,, • / / / . , • / / / · ,, / / / • / / / / • / ,;6--;/ . •/
....1 '·- -,1,,i.:.:_- L19 -··t - L·15 C3
5<
J: A . L2 EL?
L 18_J 6
t
c.. ° -· �"-- L 1 L 1 L14 EL8
6 ·- ��ASIS OF B EA RING S89 3 2' 28"W 4964.79'
c.. L 17 - :rr ----� ......--------.
o 250 _....,.
5oo
� FOUND B CHH POINT OF B EGINNING _;; POINT OF B EGINNING
(!) SW CO R. SEC. 6
� D RAINAG E EASE MENT MULTl-USE TRAIL
� T4N, R2E
(')
'= P.O.C. EAS E M ENT WIISOllf
� Calculations have been determined FOUND B CHH &COMPANY
� electronically from record documents SE CO R. SEC. 6
HAPPY VALLEY ROAD
� Date: 10/23/23
� and field survey using AutoCAD. T4N, R2E
Sheet 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT B
Happy Valley Road: 67th Avenue to 35 th Avenue
Section from Final Technical Memorandum

Ludden Mountain
Ludden Mountain is located north of HVR across the road from GCCN between 62 nd Avenue to
the west and 55 th Avenue to the east. The drainage areas were delineated using 2-ft contours
received from the Flood Control District of Maricopa County (FCDMC). See Figure 1 below for a
visual of the drainage areas and flow paths in this area.

The purple and blue shapes show the drainage areas that would impact the project limits. In
the existing condition, the flow from the blue drainage area ponds up on the north side of HVR
during low flow events. While the purple drainage area runoff will flow along the shoulder of
HVR towards the Entrada subdivision drainage channel. During high flow events, the cross slope
of HVR at this location allows for the runoff to sheet flow across the road and be collected by
existing scuppers on the eastbound curb of HVR. These scuppers outfall into the GCCN
retention basins that will drain to channel system south and east of the site. Any drainage
areas west of the purple shape will be collected by a concrete drainage ditch running from
north to south along the edge of the development and will not impact this site. Any drainage
areas east of the blue shape will be collected by the existing channel that flows towards the
culvert crossing underneath HVR.

Figure 1: Ludden Mountain Drainage Areas




- IOOoct..RLO..n.,ge layout

- USGS-2020-0PR-OIS2223 l.ft._Cootou'1

- Ludden"'" Cllamel I-ft eootoo,,
Off-site Drainage Areas

□�
OEast.ChanndW�
°"1noef Watl!:mled
---"'




EXHIBIT C




Westbound Eastioourad'
Bicycle Lane Bicycle Lane
Raised
Landscape
Median
• ljl • • • t t



Section: G2nd Ave. to West of 55th Ave.
LEGEND:
t EXISTING SIGNALS f EXISTING STREET LIGHT - WIDENING (FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT)
+ NEW SIGNALS ! NEW STREET LIGHT L.:l MILL AND OVERLAY
- EXISTING SIGN _._ NEW SIGN � EXISTING SIDEWALK
111 MULTI-USE TRAIL ml RIPRAP � NEW SIDEWALK
B EXISTING TRAIL � BUS PAD - LANDSCAPE MEDIAN f./E] CONCRETE CHANNEL LINING




PROPOSED DRIVEWAY AND RIGHT TURN POCKET FOR FUTURE ACCESS TO THE PARK

HAPPY VAi.LEY ROAD n,,w_
67TH A\£NUE TO 35TH AVENUE
PHOE>JIX STRrDS - MARICOPA CO.
0 100%
NOT fOR
':,EE DR- 1.07 FUR
Qlyd"'-­
�
-
CONSTRUCTION
N
OWJN.L.C( a-ti.NIia OR RECORllONC
INFQRt,,.IATION
l:J
I�
-- -
� r. ---------- c ----,
_,,,,- - � L
_, ___c� - -=-.........
- �
>IUT CST £\/ - ""
-----\.. ..,_......--
-·- ""
--
----""'-- •
10 • C �
�
� - - u:t"''�� :s�
, -: ,' _:_ � - _ _ _ __ ..
,. -� tm '.:- 20t-38-02• -+� - _,..,..,. � -' aw,
-t>- i!J "" � � • , ... IG'D � --- - - --- 1t11-- �-
.n ; 14111 CITYOFPHOENIX m• •• w
l
�




�'.
:.L. • • , . • • -�- · ..,�. ,;,;:�:�:7;f:;:0'.,2J'0';' :�;j?'•�;;�'.�i�
- -- -- -- -- --
�°""""+"9300.-:;, ;2 L cuee - \ "":-- 7"'swfw,Uli
_ !;;;;+ • �
0·- T
�;:::i;z�Jt•�:i��:.�
1r -G] PT CURO-.� � - +02.28.-73.62' LT- - WU - i:)
t- � /{l2J +4? 09, ·72 06' LT \ r
r
_ - +-93-00. 60 85' LT •OO 121♦00 _ 122t00 -. _ .r:PC 122+30.87
Q �. il'I � 4.,,.,. ..,._ ,._.., ..........:.. ::
:iL ID �:,,=.;i,;�,�;1/\
-:C-:.<'6:;'-
-:-1.•- ...
, .,...
•.-�•1.•.h•L "'-" •·•�•)• ..,o;_..,.,.. ,.
PT c..c
7?1 ,L�:
:-,���.;# ;,���}�

�
,---11 ,o-•
= R,.., -
J
-- •• C �'\,..._ "IEI --- � ,
)(:tD ,..
---�1;z .. ---� �
-:-fi"l .:4'1 ��
�,;� e,] -
-:--
__
u,1-0�1
L ;p' .MEOV,N St:CIION LINE&,
S._
� • .=st \ \
'le--_fc··!£=•a1•1Js�o
"+&!f.32, 1e·.J2" LT
�-· • __ -- • . -- -- h
w -- -=-\1 I lg
-,d··
s:i -
I:: 1• ..
HAPPY VALLEY ROAD
f�
-.ill
t;:; �, I I· t;;:�tu







Report

North Valley Parkway and Sonoran Wash Bridge - Engineering Services -
ST85110174 (Ordinance S-52249) - District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide Engineering Services that include
design and possible construction administration and inspection for the North Valley
Parkway and Sonoran Wash Bridge project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The total fee for services will not exceed $2,325,331.74.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads, and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide Engineering services for the North Valley
Parkway and Sonoran Wash Bridge project. Services will include final design, and
possible construction administration and inspection. This project is located across the
Sonoran Wash that aligns with North Valley Parkway between Dixileta Drive and
Rancho Tierra Drive.

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to:
· Design and prepare project plans and specifications
· Conducting geotechnical engineering and investigations of project site
· Investigate and design utilities and infrastructure for project development
· Coordinate tasks with various stakeholders including the City Environmental and
Right-of-Way teams


· Provide cost estimates
· Coordinate with Construction Manager at Risk in developing design documents
· Review of and recommendations regarding cost models/Guaranteed Maximum
Price proposals
· Assist in value engineering process
· Participate in City coordinated public information and community outreach as
required
· Construction Administration and Inspection

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Three firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: T.Y. Lin International, Inc.
Rank 3: GHD Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. will not exceed
$2,325,331.74, including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.





Location
North Valley Parkway between Dixileta Drive and Rancho Tierra Drive, and the
Sonoran Wash.
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, the City Engineer and
the Street Transportation Department.








Report

AMR Equipment, Software Support, Upgrades, and Maintenance - RFA-2425-
WMD-686 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-52236) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into a
contract with Itron, Inc. to provide automatic meter reading equipment, software
support, upgrades, and maintenance for the Water Services Department. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
total value of the contract will not exceed $73.5 million.

Summary
The City uses Itron meter reading devices on all metered accounts in the Water
Distribution System. This contract will provide necessary equipment and service to
support the Itron meter reading devices, which includes the following: automatic meter
reading (AMR) equipment, components, Temetra meter reading software and
upgrades, as well as contractual and warranty support services for Field Collection
System.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Special Circumstances Without Competition Determination
Memo based on the following reason: the AMR water meters installed within the City of
Phoenix are equipped with hardware and software proprietary to Itron, Inc., making
them incompatible with AMR equipment from other manufacturers. Itron, Inc. is the
single source provider for this proprietary equipment and software. Further request the
the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and liability waiver
provisions that would otherwise be prohibited.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2025, for a seven-year term with two one-
year options to extend.




Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $73.5 million for the seven-year plus two
one-year-options aggregate term.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department’s Operating and Capital
Improvement Program budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-154-24-2 -
Northwest Corner of 22nd Street and Quail Avenue (Ordinance G-7412) - District

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
from S-1 DVAO (Ranch or Farm Residence, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to
CP/GCP DVAO (Commerce Park District, General Commerce Park Option, Deer
Valley Airport Overlay District) to allow a warehouse.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 DVAO
Proposed Zoning: CP/GCP DVAO
Acreage: 2.53
Proposal: Warehouse

Owner: Mako's LLC c/o Jesus Fernando Maldonado
Applicant/Representative: Randy Marks, Rezio LLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this item on July 7,
2025, and recommended approval, per staff recommendation, by a vote of 10-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on August 7, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Northwest corner of 22nd Street and Quail Avenue
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 21220 N. 22nd Street

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.



ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-154-24-2) FROM S-1 DVAO (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE, DEER VALLEY AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO
CP/GCP DVAO (COMMERCE PARK DISTRICT, GENERAL
COMMERCE PARK OPTION, DEER VALLEY OVERLAY
DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 2.53-acre property located at the northwest

corner of 22nd Street and Quail Avenue in a portion of Section 22, Township 4 North,

Range 3 East as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “S-1

DVAO” (Ranch or Farm Residence, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to “CP/GCP

DVAO” (Commerce Park District/General Commerce Park Option, Deer Valley Airport

Overlay District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and
building elevations date stamped March 10, 2025, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

2. Required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper
drought-tolerant trees, 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-
gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

4. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. An outdoor employee resting area of no less than 200 square feet shall be
provided on site. The required pedestrian area shall include at a minimum a
pedestrian seating bench, constructed of quality and durable materials, and
shaded to a minimum of 75% using minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy;
drought-tolerant shade trees and/or architectural shade, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

6. A minimum of 10% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
(EV) Capable infrastructure, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

7. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near the front office and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall
adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

8. A minimum of one of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard




electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

9. A minimum 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
western half of 22nd Street.

10. A minimum 25 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
northern half of Quail Avenue.

11. A minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk shall be constructed on the west side of 22nd
Street and the north side of Quail Avenue, adjacent to the development.

12. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in
the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis.

13. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

14. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the City of Phoenix Business
Water Efficiency Program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

15. A minimum of two green infrastructure (GI) techniques for stormwater
management shall be implemented per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater
Management, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.

16. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the




decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of September,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-154-24-2

PARCEL NO 213-09-001P
The East half of the South half of Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 22, Township 4 North, Range 3 East, of the Gila and Salt
River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona.

Except the East 30 feet, and Except the South 25 feet thereof







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-146-24-4 -
Northeast Corner Black Canyon Highway and Indianola Avenue (Ordinance G-
7409) - District 4

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
from R-4A (Multifamily Residence - General), R-5 (Multifamily Residence District -
Restricted Commercial), C-3 (General Commercial), and P-1 (Passenger Automobile
Parking, Limited) to C-O/G-O (Commercial Office District, General Office Option) to
allow an office.

Summary
Current Zoning: R-4A (0.06-acres), R-5 (0.61-acres), C-3 (0.68-acres), and P-1 (1.06
acres)
Proposed Zoning: C-O/G-O
Acreage: 2.41 acres
Proposal: Office

Owner: Rosemead Properties, Inc.
Applicant/Representative: William Gasque, Civil Design Solutions, L.L.C.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Alhambra Village Planning Committee was scheduled to hear this
item on July 22, 2025 for recommendation; however, there was no quorum.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on August 7, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7 to 0.

Location
Northeast corner of Black Canyon Highway and Indianola Avenue.
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 3805, 3829, and 3839 N. Black Canyon Highway; and 2434 W.
Indianola Avenue






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-146-24-4) FROM R-4A (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE - GENERAL), R-5 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT - RESTRICTED COMMERICAL), C-3 (GENERAL
COMMERICAL), AND P-1 (PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE
PARKING, LIMITED) TO C-O/G-O (COMMERCIAL OFFICE
DISTRICT, GENERAL OFFICE OPTION).

___________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 2.41-acre site located at the northeast corner

of Black Canyon Highway and Indianola Avenue in a portion of Section 25, Township 2

North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed

from 0.06-acres of “R-4A” (Multifamily Residence – General), 0.61-acres of “R-5”

(Multifamily Residence District – Restricted Commercial), 0.68-acres of “C-3” (General

Commercial), and 1.06 acres of “P-1” (Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited) to “C-

O/G-O” (Commercial Office District, General Office Option).




SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped June 26, 2025, as modified by the following stipulations and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall
incorporate decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, striping or other
pavement treatments that visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. A minimum of 5% of the required parking spaces shall include EV Capable
infrastructure.

4. A minimum of six bicycle parking spaces shall be installed, as per the
requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. A minimum of 10% of the provided bicycle parking spaces shall include
standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities.

b. Bicycle parking spaces shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 50% shade.

5. Landscape setbacks along the east, west, and south property lines shall be
planted with minimum 2-inch caliper trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in
equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

6. The landscape setbacks shall be planted with native cacti or similar spiney
desert accent plants, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.




7. Site lighting shall be provided at building entrances/exits, and in public
assembly and parking areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

8. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
program for a minimum of 15 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

9. All street improvements and access control along Interstate I-17 are outside of
the City of Phoenix’s jurisdiction and shall be reviewed and approved by
ADOT. Documentation of the review and approval shall be provided prior to
Preliminary Site Plan approval.

10. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

11. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

12. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas located on properties for uses such as parks and schools common areas,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

13. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

14. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

15. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.




16. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

17. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

18. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of September,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-146-24-4

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,

EXCEPT THE EAST 16 1/2 FEET; AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 25 FEET; AND

EXCEPT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25;

THENCE EAST, A DISTANCE OF 33.93 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE
NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25;

THENCE SOUTH 06 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, TO THE SOUTH
LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25;

THENCE WEST, A DISTANCE OF 0.9 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25;

THENCE NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND
EXCEPT BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25;

THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF 990.35 FEET,
TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE EXISTING
PHOENIX-CORDES JUNCTION HIGHWAY;

THENCE NORTH 06 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID
EXISTING EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 25.12 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 06 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST,
ALONG SAID EXISTING EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 174.88 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE RELOCATED PHOENIX-
CORDES JUNCTION HIGHWAY;



THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 48 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 174.19 FEET;

THENCE WESTERLY 5.85 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-167-24-4 -
Approximately 95 Feet East of the Northeast Corner of 2nd Avenue and Osborn
Road (Ordinance G-7411) - District 4

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
from C-1 TOD-1 (Neighborhood Retail, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District
One) to C-2 TOD-1 (Intermediate Commercial, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay
District One) to allow a bar/restaurant.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-1 TOD-1
Proposed Zoning: C-2 TOD-1
Acreage: 0.57-acres
Proposal: Bar/Restaurant

Owner: 130 W Osborn Rd LLC
Applicant/Representative: Lauren Proper Potter, Huellmantel & Affiliates

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on July 7, 2025,
and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 10-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on August 7, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the Encanto Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 95 feet east of the northeast corner of 2nd Avenue and Osborn Road
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 120 and 124 W. Osborn Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.



ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-167-24-4) FROM C-1 TOD-1
(NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL, INTERIM TRANSIT-ORIENTED
ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT ONE) TO C-2 TOD-1
(INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, INTERIM TRANSIT-ORIENTED
ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT ONE).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 0.57 acre property located approximately 95

feet east of the northeast corner of 2nd Avenue and Osborn Road in a portion of

Section 29, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A,” is hereby changed from “C-1 TOD-1” (Neighborhood Retail, Interim Transit-

Oriented Zoning Overlay District One) to “C-2 TOD-1” (Intermediate Commercial,

Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. Upon complete redevelopment or development that increases the cumulative
floor area of the building by more than 15% from that depicted on the site plan
date stamped March 11, 2025, the following shall apply:

a. The frontage facing Osborn Road shall use an allowable frontage type
per the standards of Table 1303.2 Transect T6.

2. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall
incorporate decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, striping or other
pavement treatments that visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. A minimum of six bicycle parking spaces shall be installed, as per the
requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper, large canopy, shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking area and achieve 25% shade, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

5. A minimum of 3.5% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
(EV) Capable infrastructure, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

6. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

7. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and/or drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

8. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Phoenix Water Efficiency
Checkup program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.



9. The existing sidewalk on the north side of Osborn Road shall be detached with
a minimum 6-foot-wide sidewalk separated by a minimum 8-foot-wide
landscape area and planted to the following standards:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant,
shade trees planted 20-feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers,
maintained to a maximum height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of
75% live vegetative ground coverage.

10. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

11. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

12. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded, as identified in
the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated February 27, 2025.

13. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

14. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of September,

2025.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A


LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-167-24-4

APN: 118-32-041


SECTION 29/TOWNSHIP 2N/RANGE 3E

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

THE EAST HALF OF LOT 19, LANE SUBDIVISIONS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
RECORDED IN BOOK 3 OF MAPS, PAGE 21, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA

EXCEPT THE SOUTH 10 FEET THEREOF.




EXHIBIT B –
MAP NOT AVAILABLE







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-25-25-4 -
Approximately 670 Feet East of the Northeast Corner of 12th Street and
Campbell Avenue (Ordinance G-7410) - District 4

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) and R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) to R-3
(Multifamily Residence District) to allow multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: R1-6 (0.64-acres) and R-3 (0.64-acres)
Proposed Zoning: R-3
Acreage: 1.28
Proposal: Multifamily residential

Owner: David Aller, Wayne Properties, LLC
Applicant: David Ross, Ross Design Group, LLC
Representative: Timothy Brown, Architect, Ross Design Group, LLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Camelback East Village Planning Committee heard this item on June
3, 2025, and recommended a continuance, by a vote of 17-0.
VPC Action: The Camelback East Village Planning Committee heard this item on July
1, 2025, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 13-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on August 7, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the Camelback East Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 670 feet east of the northeast corner of 12th Street and Campbell
Avenue
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 1306 E. Campbell Avenue





Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-25-25-4) FROM R1-6 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) AND R-3 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT) TO R-3 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.28-acre property located approximately

670 feet east of the northeast corner of 12th Street and Campbell Avenue in a portion of

Section 21, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A,” is hereby changed from 0.64-acres of “R1-6” (Single-Family Residence District) and

0.64-acres of “R-3” (Multifamily Residence District) to “R-3” (Multifamily Residence

District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall have a maximum of 12 dwelling units.

2. All bicycle infrastructure and pedestrian pathways, including sidewalks, shall be
shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a
minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments, that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum of 4 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided within the common
open space and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

5. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained on site
within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance. The bicycle repair
station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high visibility and
separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The repair
station shall include, but not be limited to: standard repair tools affixed to the
station, a tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the ground,
a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while
making adjustments to the bike.

6. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include
standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. A minimum of 10% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include EV
Capable infrastructure.

8. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas located on properties for uses such as usable residential common areas,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by



structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

10. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

11. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the City of Phoenix Water
Efficiency Program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

12. A minimum 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the south side of
Minnezona Avenue, for a depth of 20 feet as measured from the western
property line.

13. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

14. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

15. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.

16. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.




SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of September,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-25-25-4

The South half of the West half of the West half of Lot 30, LINCOLN PLACE, according
to Book 3 of Maps, page 65, records of Maricopa County, Arizona.

S/T/R 21 / 2N / 3E

Q/S 18-30







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-35-25-7 -
Approximately 554 Feet South of the Southeast Corner of 69th Avenue and Van
Buren Street (Ordinance G-7413) - District 7

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
RE-43 (One-Family Residence) to A-1 (Light Industrial District) to allow truck and semi-
trailer parking, and rental parking.

Summary
Current Zoning: RE-43
Proposed Zoning: A-1
Acreage: 2.13 acres
Proposed Use: Truck and semi-trailer parking and rental parking

Owner: Encino Pallets, LLC c/o Lauro Navarro
Applicant/Representative: Shaine Alleman, Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this item on July 15, 2025,
and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 4-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on August 7, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation
with direction, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 554 feet south of the southeast corner of 69th Avenue and Van Buren
Street
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 115 and 129 N. 69th Avenue

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.



ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-35-25-7) FROM RE-43 (ONE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE) TO A-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 2.13-acre site located approximately 554 feet

south of the southeast corner of 69th Avenue and Van Buren Street in a portion of

Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A,” is hereby changed from “RE-43” (One-Family Residence) to “A-1” (Light Industrial

District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. Upon complete redevelopment or development that increases the cumulative
floor area of the building by more than 15% from that depicted on the site plan
date stamped June 16, 2025, the following shall apply:

a. The site plan and elevations shall be presented for review and comment
to the Estrella Village Planning Committee prior to preliminary site plan
approval.

b. A minimum 5-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the
north perimeter, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

c. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 300 square feet shall
be provided on site. The pedestrian area shall include a minimum of one
pedestrian seating bench or a table with benches, constructed of quality
and durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using minimum
2-inch caliper, large canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees and/or
architectural shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

d. A minimum of 25% of uncovered employee and customer surface
parking lot areas shall be shaded, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Shade may be achieved by structures or by
minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a combination
thereof.

e. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified
by the Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation
departments. This includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting
basins, bioswales, permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix
Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for
Alternative Stormwater Management.

f. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include
standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities.

g. A minimum of 5% of the required parking shall be EV Installed.

h. Any wet-cooling systems shall be designed and installed per the
standards in the latest version of the International Green Construction
Code (IGCC).




2. The maximum building height shall be 40 feet.

3. Bicycle parking shall be provided, consistent with Section 1307.H of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

4. A minimum 5-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the east
perimeter, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. Landscape areas shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy,
drought-tolerant, shade trees planted 25 feet on center, or in equivalent
groupings, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where
utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

6. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

7. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall
incorporate decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, striping or other
pavement treatments that visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. A minimum 30-foot right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed on the east
side of 69th Avenue. Construction shall include a minimum 5-foot-wide
sidewalk on the east side of 69th Avenue, adjacent to the development.

9. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in
the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated November 22, 2024.

10. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

11. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

12. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.




13. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

14. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

15. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of September,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-35-25-7

Within a portion of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 1 East of the Gila and Salt
River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more particularly described
as follows:

Parcel No.1:
The North half of Tract 5, of WESTERN ACRES, according to the plat of record in the
office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, recorded in Book 29 of Map
Page 23.

Parcel No. 2:
The South 107.5 feet of the West 330 feet of the East 1004 feet of the North 660 feet of
the Northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 1 East of the Gila and
Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona.







Report

Modification of Stipulation Request for Ratification of Planning Commission
Action - PHO-1-25--Z-232-85-4(7) - Southeast Corner of 26th Avenue and Polk
Street - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to approve the
Planning Commission's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on
matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on May 21, 2025 and the Planning
Commission on August 7, 2025. This ratification requires formal action only.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-25--Z-232-85-4(7)
Existing Zoning: C-2 and C-3
Acreage: 2.99

Owner: JC Hurts Properties, LLC/VMAP Properties, LLC
Applicant/Representative/Appellant: David Hughes, EPS Group, Inc.

Proposal: Request to delete Stipulation 1 regarding site access from Van Buren
Street.

VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard the item on May 20, 2025
and recommended approval, by a vote of 4-0.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer heard the item on May 21, 2025 and
recommended approval with a modification.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the item on August 7, 2025 and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation,
with a modification, by a vote of 7-0-1.

Location
Southeast corner of 26th Avenue and Polk Street
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 441 N. 26th Avenue






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A – STIPULATIONS – PHO-1-25—Z-232-85-4(7)
Location: Southeast corner of 26th Avenue and Polk Street

Planning Commission Recommended Stipulations:

1. That the only access to the site shall be from Van Buren Street.

A SIGN OR SIGNS AND A TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEATURE, SUCH AS A
PORK CHOP, SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE 26TH AVENUE
DRIVEWAY TO DISCOURAGE TRUCK THROUGH TRAFFIC ON MELVIN
STREET AND NORTH ONTO 26TH AVENUE; AND RESTRICT TRAFFIC TO
RIGHT-IN, LEFT-OUT MOVEMENT, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

2. That the landscaping along 26th Avenue and Polk Street shall include 24-inch
box size trees at a maximum of 20 feet on center, or placed in equivalent
groupings.

3. That the applicant provide variation in the building setbacks along 26th Avenue
and Polk Street, as approved by the DCO.

4. That sufficient right-of-way be dedicated within one year of final City Council
action to provide:

a. A 12-foot radius at 26th Avenue and Polk Street.







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Application PHO-1-25--Z-14-16-8 -
Northeast Corner of 59th Avenue and Baseline Road (Ordinance G-7408) -
District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to approve the
Planning Commission's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on
matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on May 21, 2025, and the Planning
Commission on August 7, 2025.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-25--Z-14-16-8
Existing Zoning: C-1
Acreage: 3.94

Owner: Walter Brown Jr., 59th & Baseline Holdings LLC
Applicant: Erik Baker, Chick-fil-A, Inc.
Representative: David Openshaw, 4G Development & Consulting, Inc.
Appellant: Jon S. Kimoto, on behalf of Laveen Citizens for Responsible Development
(LCRD)

Proposal: Request to modify Stipulation One regarding general conformance with the
site plan and elevations date stamped June 21, 2016.

VPC Action: The Laveen Village Planning Committee heard this item on May 12, 2025
and recommended approval, by a vote of 10-3.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer recommended heard this item on May 21,
2025 and recommended approval with a modification and additional stipulations.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on August 7, 2025 and
recommended approval, per the PHO recommendation, with an additional stipulation,
by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Baseline Road
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 7575 S. 59th Avenue; and 5850 and 5880 W. Baseline roads




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STIPULATIONS APPLICABLE TO REZONING
APPLICATION Z-14-16-8 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY ORDINANCE G-6223.

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning stipulations applicable located on the Northeast
corner of 59th Avenue and Baseline Road in a portion of Section 32, Township 1
North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Attachment “A”, are hereby
modified to read as set forth below.

STIPULATIONS:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and
elevations date stamped MARCH 5, 2025 June 21, 2016, except as modified by
the following stipulations and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

2. A minimum 50-foot landscape setback shall be provided along the southern
property line for the eastern 700 feet of the property and a minimum 35-foot
landscape setback shall be provided along the southern property line for the
western 287 feet of the property, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. The setback area shall be developed as shown in the Baseline
Road Scenic Drive cross section.

3. The developer shall construct a 10-foot multi-use trail within a 30-foot multi-use
trail easement that shall be dedicated along the north side of Baseline Road for
the length of the project, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4. The development shall provide pedestrian pathways between buildings or pads.
The pedestrian pathways shall be shaded either by trees or shade structures, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.



5. Entrances to the site and pedestrian path crossings shall be constructed with
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or another material other than
those used to pave the parking surfaces and drive aisles, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

6. Drive-through queuing lanes shall be screened from view of arterial streets
through the incorporation of a landscaped berm, screen wall or combination of a
wall and berm at least four feet in height, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

7. The development shall utilize view fencing or no fencing along the northern and
eastern property lines, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

8. Right-of-way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the east half of 59th Avenue,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. A 25-foot by 25-foot right-of-way triangle shall be dedicated at the northeast
corner of 59th Avenue and Baseline Road, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

10. The property owner shall construct all streets adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, landscaping and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

11. The developer shall submit paving plans for all arterial streets within and
adjacent to the development to the Street Transportation Department for review.

12. The developer shall complete and submit the Developer Project Information
Form for the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to Mr. Alan Hilty, (602)
262-6193, with the Street Transportation Department. This form is required by
the EPA for air quality standards.

13. The developer shall present the following plans to the Laveen Village Planning
Committee prior to preliminary site plan approval through the Planning and
Development Department.

a. Detailed building elevations

b. Detailed landscape plans

c. Detailed lighting plans

d. Detailed sign package

14. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE,
THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE I DATA TESTING AND SUBMIT
AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA


FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO
CLEARING AND GRUBBING, LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR GRADING
APPROVAL.

15. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON REVIEW OF THE
RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING, THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A QUALIFIED
ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS
ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE II
ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.

16. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED
DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER SHALL IMMEDIATELY CEASE
ALL GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT RADIUS OF
THE DISCOVERY, NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND ALLOW TIME
FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY ASSESS THE
MATERIALS.

17. The developer shall notify the following individuals by mail 15 days prior to any
14. of the following future public meetings regarding the subject site: (1) Planning
Hearing Officer hearing, (2) preliminary site plan review meeting. The notice
shall include the date, time and location of the meeting/hearing.

a. All property owners within a 1 ,000 feet radius of the subject site

b. TOM METZGER, 5626 W. CARSON ROAD, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

c. JOHN & SELMA POE, 4335 W. BURGESS LANE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

d. DON LAY, 7014 S. 57TH AVENUE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

e. DARIN REEZER, 7201 S. 58TH AVENUE LAVEEN, AZ 85339

f. DAVID PAWLOWSKI, 7031 S. 58TH AVENUE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

g. PHIL BISCHOFF, 4701 W. VALENCIA DRIVE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

h. JONATHAN FAVORITE, 8010 S. 54TH LANE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

i. PATRICK & CRYSTAL MARVIN, 4823 W. GWEN STREET, LAVEEN, AZ

j. MICHELLE RUTKOWSKI, 7650 E. WILLIAMS DRIVE, SCOTTSDALE,
AZ 85255

k. JULIE GUNN, 1809 W. MOODY TRAIL, PHOENIX, AZ 85041

l. JEFF GUNN, 1809 W. MOODY TRAIL, PHOENIX, AZ 85041




m. MARTYN WHITE, 10032 N. 38TH STREET, PHOENIX, AZ 85028

n. VERONICA MONTENIERI, 4314 W. MONTE WAY, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

o. P. MONTENIERI, 4314 W. MONTE WAY, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

p. JENNIFER ROUSE, 4821 W. ELLIS STREET, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

q. KARLA ZIDOW, 5204 W. DESERT DRIVE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

r. DIANA KUDES, 5210 W. PEDRO LANE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

s. GARY KUDES, 5210 W. PEDRO LANE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

t. DESIREE HOOGERHUIS, 3217 W. MELODY DRIVE, LAVEEN, AZ

u. JASON PALTZER, 6622 S. 50TH AVENUE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

v. JEFF & KAREN KEELOR, 7236 S. 57TH AVENUE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

w. DAPHNE HERRING, 5506 W. GLASS LANE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

x. DONNA SNOW, 6806 W. DESERT LANE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

y. JODA SCHAUMBERG, 7205 S. 58TH AVENUE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

z. FELICIA CORBETT, 4811 W. GWEN STREET, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

aa. BEN GRAFF, WITHEY MORRIS PLC, 2525 E. ARIZONA BILTMORE
CIRCLE, PHOENIX, AZ 85016

bb. RICHARD FLOR, 2022 W. ASTER DRIVE, PHOENIX, AZ 85029

cc. SANDRA GUERRERO, 3247 W. BASELINE ROAD, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

dd. RALPH PADILLA, 5813 W. ARDMORE ROAD, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

ee. LORI GONZALES, 5740 W. HIDALGO AVENUE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

ff. GARY JORGENSEN, 5527 W. CARSON ROAD, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

gg. WENDY ENSMINGER, 6806 S. 55TH LANE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

hh. KURT GRONLUND, 6834 S. 58TH AVENUE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

ii. BRIAN SMITH, 56222 W. CARSON ROAD, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

jj. MATT CHRISTOPHER, 7019 S. 55TH LANE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339


kk. DON MEDLING, 5529 W. DARREL ROAD, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

ll. AL MARTINEZ, 7011 S. 58TH AVENUE, LAVEEN, AZ 85339

mm. PHIL HERTEL, 2845 W. BROADWAY ROAD, PHOENIX, AZ 85041

nn. JON KIMOTO, 3216 W. ANSEL ROAD LAVEEN, AZ 85339

oo. JOHN MOCKUS, 4807 W. SAMANTHA WAY, PHOENIX, AZ 85339

18. All cellular communication facilities shall be building mounted or internal to the
15. cross.

19. The developer shall provide minimum 3-inch caliper trees, placed 20-feet on
16. center or in equivalent groupings, within the eastern 560 feet of the northern
landscape setback, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

20. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
17. Proposition 207 waiver of claims in a form approved by the City Attorney's
Office. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder's
Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file for
record.

21. The Development shall not include any underground fuel storage tanks, as
18. approved by the Planning and Development Department.

22. THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH THE COMMUNITY TO DEVELOP A
GATEWAY MONUMENT FOR 59TH AVENUE AND BASELINE ROAD,
SUBJECT TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

SECTION 2. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district granted pursuant to Ordinance G-6223, this portion of the rezoning is now
subject to the stipulations approved pursuant to Ordinance G-6223 and as modified in
Section 1 of this ordinance. Any violation of the stipulation is a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Building permits shall not be issued for the subject site
until all the stipulations have been met.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of
September, 2025.




________________________________
MAYOR



ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A - Legal Description (3 Pages)
B - Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PHO-1-25—Z-14-16-8

The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Maricopa, State of
Arizona, and is described as follows:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION (COMMITMENT NO. 5174198-F-AZ-CP-GRS)(PARCEL 1)
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 33.00
FEET WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 60.00 FEET OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
EAST LINE OF THE WEST 33.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 201.72 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST,
ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE WEST 33.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 142.30
FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL
WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF
380.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL
WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 160.01
FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL
WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 75.00
FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL
WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 184.01
FEET TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 60.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHWEST
QUARTER;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 243.28 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 31
SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST
QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 201.72 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL
WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF


211.72 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE OF THE WEST 33.00 FEET OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF
PHOENIX IN THAT CERTAIN SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED ON JUNE
21, 2019 AS 2019-0466591 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION (COMMITMENT NO. 5198835-F-AZ-CP-GRS)(PARCEL 2)
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 33 FEET
WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 60 FEET OF SAID SOUTHWEST
QUARTER;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
EAST LINE OF THE WEST 33 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 201.72 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL
WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF
211.72 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL
WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 201.72
FEET TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 60.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHWEST
QUARTER;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 211.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX IN
DEED RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0028709 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT A COTTON PICKER SPINDLE MARKING THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 32.42 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 22 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 60.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF
LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2017-0766578, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 34 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE
WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 47.00 FEET;




THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 22.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL
WITH AND 22.00 FEET EAST OF SAID WESTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 11.00
FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 44.81 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST, PARALLEL
WITH AND 3.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL, A
DISTANCE OF 159.72 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID
PARCEL;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID
EASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 3.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID PARCEL;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 211.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.







Report

***REQUEST TO CONTINUE (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Public Hearing -
Abandonment Appeal of Hearing Officer Decision - ABND 250004 - 817 W.
Madison Street - District 7

Abandonment: 250004 (Attachment A)
Project: 05-205
Abandonment Applicant: Greenman Law/Jordan Greenman
Date of Abandonment Hearing Officer’s Decision: May 15, 2025
Appellant: Greenman Law/Jordan Greenman

Summary
Rationale: Appellant is the original Applicant for abandonment, and is appealing the
Hearing Officer's DENIAL of the request to abandon the east 20 feet of the 45-foot
right-of-way lying westerly of lot 19, APN 112-05-016A. The Appellant's narrative, the
hearing summary, and the original staff report have been attached (Attachments B
and C) for consideration by City Council.

Location
Generally located at 817 W. Madison Street
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
ABND 250004




±
1 inch = 60 feet
Disclaimer : The information provided on this map is based on record drawings submitted by others. 0 25 50 100 Feet Date: 6/17/2025 189
Users of this information are cautioned that independent verification of actual conditions may be necessary.
Printing Water Data is for Internal Staff Only
ATTACHMENT B




Planning and Development Department




DENIAL – ABND 250004




Your abandonment request was DENIED by Craig Messer, Abandonment Hearing Officer.

A summary of the hearing, and the Hearing Officer’s findings and rationale, are included in this
letter.

You have the right to appeal this decision to City Council if an appeal application is
received by the Planning and Development Department within 15 calendar days of this
decision (latest appeal date: May 30 2025). Please contact the Abandonment Coordinator,
Dru Maynus, at (602) 262-7403, or abandonments@phoenix.gov, for questions regarding
appeals.





Planning and Development Department


May 15, 2025
Preliminary Abandonment Staff Report: ABND 250004
Project# 05-205
Quarter Section: 10-26
District#: 7



Location: The east 20 feet of right-of-way lying
westerly of 817 West Madison Street

Applicant: Greenman Law / Jordan Greenman

Request: Request to the east 20-feet of the 45-feet
right-of-way lying westerly of lot 19, Block 1,
Neahr’s Addition APN 112-05-016A.

Purpose of request: Applicant states the right-of-way
abandonment will allow for the
redevelopment of the abutting parcel.

Hearing date: March 13, 2025
TAKEN OUT FROM UNDER
ADVISEMENT AND DENIED ON May 15,





City Staff Research
City Staff research shows that the 9th Avenue 90-feet right-of-way was dedicated on January 25,
1900 by the Evans Subdivision of Block 29 Nearh’s Addition Subdivision Plat under Book 2,
Page 77 of the Maricopa County Recorder. If abandoned, the 9th Avenue 20-feet-wide right-of-
way would be conveyed back to the abutting property owner.

City Staff Comments
This request was routed to various City departments for their recommendations. Listed below
are the responses from each department.

Street Transportation Department – Josh Rogers
The Street Transportation Department has reviewed the attached abandonment application and
has the following:

Comments:

The Capitol Mall is a distinct area within the City of Phoenix. Under the planning oversight of
the State of Arizona, the area serves multiple purposes including housing the State Capitol,
governmental offices, industrial and commercial businesses, and historic residences. As is
typical in urban settings, the open space within the Capitol Mall consists of both private and
public properties. Enhanced streetscapes along the public street network play a vital role in the
urban open space environment, improving its functionality and accessibility for the public.


Originally platted as one of Phoenix’s first subdivisions during Arizona’s territorial period, the
Capitol Mall features rights-of-way’s historically wider than typical city street cross-sections. Like
other urban districts near downtown, local roadways are designed to accommodate a diversity
of public and pedestrian uses, necessitating a broader streetscape than what is typical for local
roads.

Furthermore, modifications to the streetscape within the Capitol Mall District must be part of a
coordinated planning effort with the State of Arizona, City of Phoenix, and area stakeholders. As
such, the City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department does not support standalone
modifications.

Given the historic nature of the district’s street cross-sections, their intended function within an
urban area, and the absence of a unified streetscape modification plan, the Street
Transportation Department does not support the proposed abandonment of the 9th Avenue
right-of-way.

Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at
Joshua.rogers@phoenix.gov.

Street Transportation Utility Coordination Department– Andrea Diaz
The Street Transportation Department Utility Coordination section has no comments


PDD Traffic Department – Derek Fancon
Recommend denial of the 20-feet right-of-way. 9th avenue is offset to the ease, so abandoning
20-feet will bring the right-of-way to the back of curb, leaving no room for the sidewalk.
However, Traffic would recommend approval of the abandonment of 10-feet right-of-way so long
as the sidewalk is relocated.

PDD Planning Department – Dru Maynus
Capitol Mall Overlay District - The abandonment request is located within the Capitol Mall
Overlay District per Section 646 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of
Capitol Mall is prevent a concentration of certain uses which can restrict businesses and
residences from functioning normally and contributes to the deterioration of the business and
living environment the downgrading of property values, and the diminishment of health, safety
and general welfare conditions in the area. Further the intent of the district is to protect existing
residential and non residential uses from negative impacts caused by a concentration of
specified uses and to prohibit he addition of certain uses and restrict the addition of certain other
uses which have negative impacts on the area. Please be sure that the intended use of your
development is consistent with the permitted uses of Section 646.

Governmental Mall Notification Area - To add, the abandonment site is located within the
Governmental Mall Notification Area, thus, meaning is part of the Arizona Government Mall
Master Plan. The Master plan was adopted by the State Legislature; therefore, indicating that
the site is governed by the State of Arizona. Because of this all-development activity within the
area must first obtain approval from the Arizona Department of Administration (AZDOA). Please
contact Ruben Duran with AZDOA to start this process. Ruben can be contacted at 602-397-
1350 or ruben.duran@azdoa.gov.

Railroad - Please note that if you plan on obtaining any building permits a “Notice of Railroad


Proximity Disclosure” is required. This document will be provided during Site and Civil reviews
or when building plans are logged in.

Federal/State Superfund - This property is located in a Federal Superfund or State Superfund
site. The customer can obtain information by going to the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ) website located at https://www.azdeq.gov/NPL_Sites [azdeq.gov] for Federal
Superfund sites or https://www.azdeq.gov/WQARF [azdeq.gov] for State Superfund sites.
ADEQ can also be reached by phone at 602-771-4410 for Superfund or State Superfund sites.
The City of Phoenix Office of Environmental Programs can be reached at 602-256-5669.

Future Light Rail - The abandonment area is located within a future light rail corridor. Please
contact the office of Customer Advocacy (OCA) at 602-534-7344 for more information.

Since the abandonment request has not received approval from AZDOA, the Site Planning
Division currently does not recommend approval of the abandonment request.

ADOA – General Services Division – Joel Carrasco
Prior to approval of ABND 250004 the applicant needs to contact Ruben Duran with AZDOA to
obtain approval of the abandonment request.

Office of Customer Advocacy – Renee Blakley
Although the property is near future expansion, it is more than a block away. The requested
area of ABND 250004 is not located on a street directly adjacent to a planned light rail extension
and will not have a negative impact to future light rail expansion.

Streetlights – Jason Fernandez
Recommend approval with the following comment:
1. Page 2 of ABND narrative paragraph 1, line 2 thru 4, sentence 2, references "The
proposed abandonment will enable the property owner to relocate existing sidewalks
and re purpose the land to better serve the community." Future sidewalk relocate and
re-purpose will require new streetlight / pedestrian lighting review and construction at
owners expense.

Solid Waste – Megan Sheets
Approved.

Water Services – Don Reynolds
WSD has NO stipulations for this Abandonment.

PDD Village Planner – Samuel Rogers
1. Staff has concerns regarding the request.
2. The Capital District Development Guidelines state: "For the safety and comfort of
pedestrians, sidewalks should be separated from traffic by an 8-foot width. This 8-foot
buffer may include landscaping, a bicycle lane, and/or on-street parking." The proposed
abandonment would eliminate this buffer, reducing walkability and compromising
pedestrian safety.
3. The Government Mall Master Plan identifies Madison Street as a proposed secondary
bike route. The proposed abandonment would negatively impact bicycle infrastructure
and pedestrian accessibility in the area.
4. The Government Mall Master Plan includes the following goals:
a. "Preserve, revitalize, and enhance the iconic and historical character of the area


through design guidance and enhanced public infrastructure; and"
b. "Foster an implementable approach to the development of iconic, vibrant, day-
and-night mixed-use activity centers serving residents and visitors to the area."

The proposed abandonment does not support these goals, as it would not enhance public
infrastructure nor preserve the historic character of the area. Furthermore, reducing pedestrian
and bicycle accessibility would create a less comfortable streetscape for residents and visitors

PDD Civil Department – Rachel LaMesa
Civil Division recommends approval without stipulations.

Public Transit Department – Skitch Kitchen
The Public Transit Department has no comment on this project.


Utility Comments
The request was also routed to outside utility companies for their input. Listed below are the
responses from each utility.
Cox – Zach Lawson
I have reviewed the abandonment request at ABND 250004 APN 112-05-016A 817 W
MADISON ST, in Phoenix, {Maricopa County}, AZ. Based upon the supplied drawings/exhibits
that you’ve submitted it has been determined that COX has no facilities within the easement and
therefore we approve your request to abandon.

Please note that although Cox Communications approves this abandonment, we do so with the
understanding that we will not assume any construction, relocation and/or repairs costs
associated or in result of this abandonment.

Southwest Gas – Susan R. Mulanax
After reviewing your request, it has been noted that we have a main gas line running in the area
proposed. Please contact Conflict Review at (480) 730-3843 to discuss and review your request
further.

Arizona Public Service – Darianna Arias
Not within APS’s service territory.

CenturyLink – Bill Paul
Quest Corporation d/b/a CENTURYLINK CQ (“CenturyLink”) has reviewed the request for the
subject abandonment request and has determined that in order to protect its facilities,
CenturyLink must deny the request at this time.

If you would like to discuss possible alternative resolutions to this abandonment request, please
contact Bill Paul 727-449-3544 or bill.paul@lumen.com..


Salt River Project – Michael Laguna
Salt River Project has no objection to the abandonment of the east 20 feet Right-of-Way as
shown in the abandonment package. This is in an Arizona Public Service serving area.




Hearing Officer Decision and Findings

I have concluded that the ROW requested for abandonment is still necessary for public
use and therefore have DENIED this request.

Additional details are provided below.
1. Requirements for Disposition of Public Rights-of-Way (ROW). In considering this request, this
Hearing Officer has had to examine whether the ROW requested for abandonment is, in fact, no
longer necessary for public use as roadways. The following two definitions in Section 31-63 of
the City Code are important to this analysis:

• Abandon, abandoning, and abandonment: Any one of the methods set forth in Section 31-
64 whereby the City Council may dispose of roadways or portions of roadways no longer
necessary for public use as roadways.
• Roadway: All or part of any platted or designated public street, highway, alley, lane, parkway,
avenue, road, sidewalk, public utility easement, or other public way, whether or not it has
been used as such. (italics added for emphasis)


Any interested party has the right to appeal this decision to City Council. An appeal
application must be received by the Planning and Development Department within 15
calendar days of this decision (latest appeal date: May 30, 2025).
Please contact the Abandonment Coordinator, Dru Maynus, at (602) 262-7403, or
abandonments@phoenix.gov, for questions regarding appeals.




May 15, 2025
Hearing Officer Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ___________




REPORT SUBMITTED BY: Dru Maynus, Abandonment Coordinator.

cc: Greenman Law, Jordan Greenman, Applicant
Craig Messer, Abandonment Hearing Officer


If the area to be abandoned is within or adjacent to a redevelopment area established pursuant to
A.R.S.§36-1471 ET.SEQ., Consideration may be given to the restrictions upon the property and the
covenants, conditions and obligations assumed by the redeveloper in the determination of fair market value.





ATTACHMENT C


Abandonment
Decision Appeal

In accordance with Section 31-70, Article V of the City Code, the decision of the Abandonment
Hearing Officer regarding the abandonment of public rights-of way may be appealed. Any
decision of the Abandonment Hearing Officer shall be considered final unless a person
aggrieved thereby, files a written Notice of Abandonment Appeal with the Planning &
Development Department within fifteen calendar days after the decision is made. The
completed abandonment appeal form and filing fee* must be submitted to the Planning &
Development Department, Check-In/Information Counter, located at 200 West Washington
Street, 2nd floor, Phoenix, Arizona 85003.

*All fees are pursuant to the current Fee Schedule contained in Appendix A.2. of the
Phoenix City Code.
Jordan Greenman - Greenman Law Firm
Appellant’s Name:
1621 W Willetta St Phoenix 85007
Address: City: State: AZ Zip:
Phone: 248-225-0428 Email:
Affiliation: Attorney - Applicant

Appeal to City Council
Be specific as to what you are appealing. Include the rationale for your appeal. Attachments
may be included.
250004 March 13, 2025
Abandonment # ABND Date Heard:

Located at approximately: Immediately west of 817 West Madison St

Abandonment Hearing Officer: Approved X Denied

Appealing Decision: Appealing denial of ABND 250004 - See attached narrative

Appealing Stipulation:

Appealing Stipulation:

Appealing Stipulation:

------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Use Only --------------------------------------------------------------
Received By: Receipt #: Date:
Reviewed By: Receipt #: Date:

An applicant may receive a clarification from the city of its interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorized substantive
policy statement. To request clarification or to obtain further information on the application process and applicable review time frames, please
call 602-262-7811 or visit our website at Licensing Time Frames | City of Phoenix. This publication can be made available in alternate formats
(Braille, large print, or digital media) upon request. Contact Planning & Development at (602) 262-7811 voice or (602) 534-5500 TTY.
P:\Abandonment Decision Appeal TRT/DOC/00005
WEB\ EXTERNAL dsd_trt_pdf_00005 Rev. 11/12


Jordan Evan Greenman
1621 West Willetta Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Phone: 248.225.0428
jordan@greenmanlawfirm.com
May 30, 2025

Phoenix City Council
200 West Jefferson Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003

Formal Appeal of Denial of Abandonment Request – ABND 250004

Dear Phoenix City Council,

On behalf of Ian Likwarz, Greenman Law respectfully submits this appeal of the denial of ABND
250004, which concerns the proposed abandonment of the eastern 20 feet of South 9th Avenue right-
of-way adjacent to 817 West Madison Street, Phoenix, Arizona (Lot 19, Block 1, Neahr’s Addition;
APN 112-05-016A). The matter was originally heard on March 13, 2025, and taken under advisement,
but the decision was not issued until May 15, 2025—63 days later, well beyond the typical 30-day
timeframe provided for such determinations. This substantial delay created uncertainty and slowed
momentum on an adaptive reuse project that aligns directly with the City’s revitalization objectives
for the Capitol Mall area.
Functional Basis for the Abandonment Request
The project in question seeks to reactivate a pre-WWII industrial warehouse by converting it into a
banquet hall and community event venue, with outdoor dining and gathering space along the 9th
Avenue frontage. To support this, the applicant requested the abandonment of a 20-foot-wide strip
of underutilized right-of-way. This portion of 9th Avenue is significantly oversized, measuring 90 feet
in total width—far beyond the 50-foot standard for local streets established in the City’s 2018 Street
Classification Map. The eastern half-street alone spans 45 feet, when only 25 feet is required for public
functionality. Approving the abandonment would still preserve a 70-foot-wide right-of-way, which is
more than sufficient to accommodate vehicular travel, public utilities, and pedestrian infrastructure.

The need for abandonment is also driven by practical site constraints. The existing building is a 1940s
bow truss structure that currently lacks HVAC. Due to its age and construction type, the roof cannot
support the weight of rooftop HVAC units. As a result, the project requires a dedicated structure to
house the HVAC equipment on the west side of the building. The 14 feet of right-of-way proposed
for abandonment would be necessary to accommodate and support this mechanical structure, which
is essential to bringing the building up to modern functional standards.
ROW Dimensions and Sidewalk Relocation Feasibility
The purpose of the requested abandonment is not speculative. The project requires at least 15 feet of
the subject area for construction of the outdoor patio space that fronts 9th Avenue. If the full 20-foot
abandonment is approved, it would allow us to dedicate and build out five feet on the western portion



to reconstruct the sidewalk farther west, preserving pedestrian access while also improving public
safety. The existing curb lies approximately 20 feet from the edge of the building, making sidewalk
relocation feasible without affecting traffic flow or curb alignment. No vehicular lanes or curb lines
would be altered in any way as a result of the abandonment. Preliminary approval for the abandonment
of the eastern 28 feet of South 9th Avenue, adjacent to 817 West Madison Street, was previously
granted in 2018 under case number ABND 170026. Unfortunately, the project was delayed and the
approval lapsed.
Alignment with City Policy and Light Rail Objectives
This adaptive reuse effort directly supports the goals of the Capitol Mall Overlay District, which calls
for coordinated redevelopment that respects the area’s historic character while fostering mixed-use
investment and pedestrian activity. The surrounding neighborhood has long suffered from vacancy,
disinvestment, and persistent social challenges. This project would introduce regular foot traffic,
community events, new employment opportunities, and high-quality streetscape enhancements to a
corridor that has seen little improvement in decades. The site is also located within one block of the
future light rail expansion, making it an ideal location for transit-oriented development. The City has
repeatedly emphasized the importance of placing walkable, mixed-use projects near the light rail line,
and this proposal would contribute directly to that effort.
Agency and Utility Review Summary
Importantly, this request was not rejected due to a technical deficiency or a safety concern. In fact,
most City departments either supported the abandonment or had no objections. The Civil Division,
Water Services, Solid Waste, Streetlights, and Public Transit all approved the request outright. The
Traffic Department recommended partial approval—specifically 10 feet—conditioned on sidewalk
relocation, confirming the basic viability of shifting pedestrian access westward. The Office of
Customer Advocacy confirmed that the abandonment area is more than a block away from any
planned light rail expansion and would not interfere with any future transit development. CenturyLink
and Southwest Gas noted the presence of existing facilities but indicated a willingness to work through
utility coordination processes, as is standard for abandonment cases. Cox and SRP approved without
objection.
ADOA Approval and Planning Staff Concerns
Further, Greenman Law has already obtained formal written approval from the Arizona Department
of Administration (ADOA), which oversees the Governmental Mall area. In a letter dated March 27,
2025, ADOA confirmed that it reviewed and approved the proposed abandonment of the subject 20-
foot strip and deferred to the City of Phoenix for implementation. This directly contradicts the
Planning Department’s assertion that the abandonment should not proceed absent ADOA support,
and eliminates any ambiguity as to state-level approval of the proposal.





Despite this overwhelming technical support, the abandonment was denied based on generalized
planning theories and speculative concerns about future streetscape design, rather than any practical
or site-specific rationale. The City's own transportation and planning maps confirm that the right-of-
way is substantially oversized. There is no identifiable or realistic public use for the subject strip, and
its retention serves only to obstruct meaningful and needed redevelopment. Phoenix City Code
Section 31-64 authorizes abandonment of public rights-of-way when they are no longer necessary for
public use, and that standard is unquestionably met here.
Conclusion and Request for Reversal
This neighborhood needs reinvestment. The City should be encouraging catalytic projects like this—
especially those that preserve historic buildings and convert them into vibrant community-serving
spaces. This proposal is consistent with Phoenix’s Adaptive Reuse Program, with the City’s General
Plan, with Capitol Mall overlay goals, and with the City's long-term light rail vision. The applicant has
done everything possible to coordinate with City and State staff and has responded constructively to
agency feedback at every stage.

We respectfully ask that the City Council reverse the Hearing Officer’s decision and approve the
abandonment as requested. This project deserves the opportunity to move forward and help breathe
life back into a part of the city that has waited far too long for meaningful investment. Please contact
me at any time with questions or for further information.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,




Jordan Evan Greenman
Greenman Law








Report

Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-100-24-3 -
Southeast Corner of 21st Place and Eugie Terrace (Ordinance G-7414) - District 3

Request to hold a public hearing and consider amending the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning
Application Z-100-24-3, and rezone the site from R-3 (Multifamily Residence District)
to R-5 (Multifamily Residence District - Restricted Commercial) to allow multifamily
residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: R-3
Proposed Zoning: R-5
Acreage: 1.01 acres
Proposal: Multifamily residential

Owner: Amit Netzach, Netzach Investments LLC
Applicant/Representative: Randy Marks, Rezio LLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard this item on July 7,
2025, and recommended denial with direction, by a vote of 9-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on August 7, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 6-2.
The Planning Commission recommendation was appealed by a community member
on August 14, 2025.

Location
Southeast corner of 21st Place and Eugie Terrace
Council District: 3
Parcel Address: 13431 N. 21st Place

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.



ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-100-24-3) FROM R-3 (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R-5 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT – RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.01-acre property located at the southeast

corner of 21st Place and Eugie Terrace in a portion of Section 15, Township 3 North,

Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from R-3

(Multifamily Residence District) to R-5 (Multifamily Residence District – Restricted

Commercial).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 24 units.

2. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped June 16, 2025, as modified by the following stipulations and approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper,
large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent
groupings; and shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly
distributed throughout the landscape areas to achieve a minimum of 50% live
coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. All bicycle infrastructure and pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks) shall
be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a
minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6. A minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk shall be constructed on the east/south side of
21st Place/Eugie Terrace.

7. Vehicular access onto 21st Place/Eugie Terrace shall be limited to a singular
access point.

8. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

9. Bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.25 spaces per unit, up
to a maximum of 50 spaces shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic
racks and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, or through secure parking storage area/s, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the
Master Plan.

10. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include
standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as


approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided on the site. The station
shall include but not be limited to: standard repair tools affixed to the station; a
tire gauge and pump; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and
wheels to spin freely while making adjustments to the bike, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department

12. A minimum of 10% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
(EV) Installed Infrastructure, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas located on properties for uses such as residential common areas, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

14. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

15. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

16. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
Program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

17. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

18. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

19. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.




SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of September,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-100-24-3


For APN/Parcel ID(s): 166-10-045 4

Section/Township/Range: 15 3N 3E

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
Lot 16, Block 5, of Sun and Sand, according to the Plat of record in the office of the
County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, recorded in Book 54 of Maps, Page




ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025

Paradise Valley Village Planning July 7, 2025
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 7, 2025

Request From: R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) (1.01
acres)
Request To: R-5 (Multifamily Residence District – Restricted
Commercial) (1.01 acres)
Proposal: Multifamily residential
Location: Southeast corner of 21st Place and Eugie
Terrace
Owner: Amit Netzach, Netzach Investments, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Randy Marks, Rezio, LLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

General Plan Conformity
Residential 5 to 15 dwelling units per
General Plan Land Use Designation
acre
21st Place Local 25-foot east half street
Street Map Classification
Eugie Terrace Local 25-foot south half street
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The proposed density is 23.76 dwelling units per gross acre, which is a reasonable level
of increased intensity, and as stipulated, is respectful of local conditions and
surrounding neighborhoods.
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; DESIGN PRINCIPLE:
Development should include convenient bicycle parking.

The proposal, as stipulated, will provide secured bicycle parking, a repair station, and
parking spaces for electric bicycle charging capabilities near open space areas. The
bicycle parking will provide residents and guests with an alternative mode of
transportation to the site near Cave Creek Road, which contains designated bike lanes.




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY; TREES AND SHADE; DESIGN
PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development and
redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The proposal, as stipulated, will provide pedestrian pathways and bicycle infrastructure
shaded to a minimum of 75 percent. Additionally, the open space areas and landscape
setback are required to provide large canopy shade trees.


Applicable Plan, Overlays, and Initiatives
Housing Phoenix Plan: See Background Item No. 7.

Shade Phoenix Plan: See Background Item No. 8.

Complete Streets Guidelines: See Background Item No. 9.

Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 10.

Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 11.

Transportation Electrification Action Plan: See Background Item No. 12.

Phoenix Climate Action Plan: See Background Item No. 13.

Conservation Measures for New Development: See Background Item No. 14.



Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning

Land Use Zoning

On Site Single-family residential R-3
North (across Eugie
Single-family residential R-3
Terrace)
Multifamily residential (senior
West (across 21st Place) R-3
housing)
South Multifamily residential R-3

East Commercial C-2




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025



R-5 – Multifamily Residence District
(Subdivision Development Option)

Standards Requirements Proposed

Gross Acreage - 1.01 acres
Maximum Number of Units 44 24 (Met)
Maximum Density 43.5 dwelling units per 23.76 dwelling units per acre
(dwelling units/acre) acre (Met)
Maximum Lot Coverage 50%, plus an additional 42% (Met)
10% for an attached
shade structure

Total: 60%
Maximum Building Height 4 stories or 48 feet 4 stories, 46.5 feet (Met)
Minimum Building Setbacks
Front 20 feet North: 47 feet (Met)
West: 44 feet (Met)
Rear 15 feet 15 feet (Met)
Sides 10 feet, 3 feet 10 feet, 10 feet (Met)
Minimum Landscape Setbacks
Adjacent to Public Street 20 feet North:20 feet (Met)
West: 20 feet (Met)
Adjacent to Property Line 5 feet East: 5 to 9 feet (Met)
South: 5 feet (Met)
Minimum Parking 36 spaces 36 spaces (Met)
Minimum Open Space 5% 5% (Met)

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 1.01 acres located at the southeast corner of 21st Place
and Eugie Terrace from R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) to R-5 (Multifamily
Residence District – Restricted Commercial) for multifamily residential.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
2. The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Residential 5
to 15 dwelling units per acre. The proposal for R-5 zoning is not consistent with
the General Plan Land Use Map designation; however, a General Plan
Amendment is not required as the site is smaller than 10 acres in size, and the




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025

housing product type is the same for the Residential 5 to 10 and Residential 15+
land use designations. The General Plan Land Use Map designations
surrounding the site to the north, south, and west are also Residential 5 to 15
dwelling units per acre and to the east is designated Commercial.




General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
3. The subject site contains a single-family
residence and is zoned R-3 (Multifamily
Residence District). To the north of the
subject site, across Eugie Terrace, is a
single-family residence zoned R-3. To
the west of the subject site, across 21st
Place, is multifamily residential zoned R-
3. To the east of the subject site are
commercial properties zoned C-2
(Intermediate Commercial). To the south
is multifamily residential zoned R-3.

Zoning Sketch Map
Source: Planning and Development Department
PROPOSAL
4. Site Plan
The site plan, attached as an exhibit, proposes a new 24-unit multifamily
residential development. The proposal includes 36 parking spaces, five of which
are reserved for accessible parking spaces. The building is proposed to be on
stilts with automobile parking underneath. The open space is centrally located,




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025

approximately 2,272 square feet, and the amenities include turf and a barbecue
area.

To maintain compatibility with surrounding land uses and zoning districts, staff
recommends Stipulation No. 1 which limits the site to 24 units, which is what is
proposed.

To enhance the landscape setbacks and provide additional shade, staff
recommends the landscape setbacks be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper,
large canopy, shade trees planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings,
and shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to achieve a minimum of 50
percent live coverage at maturity. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 3.

To enhance pedestrian safety, staff recommends the pedestrian walkways
crossing a vehicle path to be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or
colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that visually contrast parking and
drive aisle surfaces. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 5.

5. Landscape Plan
The conceptual landscape plan, attached as an exhibit, proposes trees along the
street frontage and interior property lines. The required landscape setbacks shall
be planted with large canopy shade trees, shrubs, accents, and vegetative
ground covers as required by Stipulation No. 3.

6. Elevations
The building elevations, attached as an exhibit, proposes a building which
cantilevers over the parking area and includes a variation of colors and materials,
CMU/block, exposed wood, and painted metal and architectural balconies. Staff
recommends general conformance to the elevations date stamped June 16,
2025. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 2.

PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITATIVES
7. Housing Phoenix Plan
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing
with a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased
housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s
rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over
163,000 new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to
demand are a primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The proposal
supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030
by contributing to a variety housing types that will address the supply shortage at
a more rapid pace while using vacant land in a more sustainable fashion.

8. Shade Phoenix Plan




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025

In November 2024, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Shade Phoenix Plan.
The Shade Phoenix Plan prioritizes increasing shade coverage throughout the
City to improve health and quality of life. Investing in shade can address the
urban heat island effect, clean the air, preserve Sonoran vegetation, and prevent
health complications related to prolonged exposure to heat. The Shade Phoenix
Plan provides numerous strategies to increase shade including expanding and
maintaining existing shade, strengthening tree code enforcement, and
developing shade stipulations in rezoning cases. Staff recommends robust tree
planting standards, including planting minimum two-inch caliper trees 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings within the landscape setbacks, and dispersed
throughout uncovered surface parking lot areas to achieve 25 percent shade at
maturity. Staff also recommends that all pedestrian walkways and bicycle
infrastructure be shaded a minimum of 75 percent. This is addressed in
Stipulation Nos. 3, 4, and 15.

9. Complete Streets Guidelines
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. Staff recommends pedestrian
walkways to be constructed of a visually contrasting material or other pavement
treatment where they cross a vehicular path, construction of a sidewalk along
21st Place/Eugie Terrace, and that sidewalks and all street improvements to be
constructed with all required elements and comply ADA accessibility standards.
This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 5, 6 and 8.

10. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-
term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. As stipulated, the project will provide a bicycle parking spaces per
the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance within
common open space areas and a bicycle repair station (Stipulation Nos. 9
through 11). This will help promote bicycling as an alternative mode of
transportation nearby Cave Creek Road, which has a designated bike lane.

11. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal
to become a zero-waste city, as part of the City’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use developments
meeting certain criteria. The applicant’s submittal materials indicate that the




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025

proposal will encourage the use of recycling services to all residents.

12. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation
Electrification Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of
transportation is both a national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for
better air quality, a reduction in carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle
operating and maintenance costs. Businesses, governments and the public are
signaling strong future demand for electric vehicles (EVs), and many automobile
manufacturers have declared plans for a transition to fully electric offerings within
the coming decade. This Plan contains policy initiatives to prepare the City for a
future filled with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-mobility equity, and
outlines a roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV infrastructure needs
of 280,000 EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan to accelerate public
adoption of electric vehicles through workplace, business, and multifamily
charging infrastructure recommends a standard stipulation for rezoning cases to
provide EV charging infrastructure. This goal is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 10
and 12, which requires a minimum of 10 percent of the required parking spaces
to include EV Installed infrastructure and a minimum of 10 percent of required
bicycle parking to include standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle
charging capabilities.

13. Phoenix Climate Action Plan
In October 2021, the Phoenix City Council approved the Climate Action Plan.
The Climate Action Plan will serve as a long-term plan to achieve greenhouse
gas emissions reductions and resiliency goals from local operations and
community activities as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change. This
plan contains policy and initiatives regarding stationary energy, transportation,
waste management, air quality, local food systems, heat, and water. Goal W2
(Water), Action W2.4, pertains to the implementation of the Greater Phoenix
Metro Green Infrastructure (GI) and Low Impact Development Details for
Alternative Stormwater Management to benefit the environment, promote water
conservation, reduce urban heat, improve public health, and create additional
green spaces. This goal is addressed in Stipulation No. 17, requiring a minimum
of two GI techniques for stormwater management to be implemented in this
development.

14. Conservation Measures for New Development
In June 2023, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Conservation Measures for
New Development policy as part of a resolution addressing the future water
consumption of new development (Resolution 22129). This resolution addresses
the future water consumption of new development to support one of the City’s
Five Core Values in the General Plan which calls for Phoenix to “Build the
Sustainable Desert City”. The Conservation Measures for New Development
policy includes direction to develop standards for consideration as stipulations for




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025

all rezoning cases that will address best practices related to water usage in nine
specific categories. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 13 through 16.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
15. At the time this staff report was written, staff received no public comments related
to this rezoning case.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
16. Street Transportation Department
The Street Transportation Department requested that a minimum five-foot-wide
sidewalk be constructed along the street frontage. Also, vehicular access to the
street shall be limited to a singular access point and all streets within and
adjacent to the development shall be constructed with all required elements and
to ADA requirements. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 6 through 8.

OTHER
17. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in
the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the
time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 18.

18. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 19.

19. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.
Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.

Findings

1. As stipulated, the proposal provides enhanced shading and trees to be a
compatible addition to the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses.

3. As stipulated, the proposal supports efforts from various plans, such as the
Shade Phoenix Plan, the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, the Transportation
Electrification Action Plan, and the Phoenix Climate Action Plan.




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025

Stipulations

1. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 24 units.

2. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped June 16, 2025, as modified by the following stipulations and approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper,
large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent
groupings; and shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly
distributed throughout the landscape areas to achieve a minimum of 50% live
coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. All bicycle infrastructure and pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks) shall
be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a
minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6. A minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk shall be constructed on the east/south side of
21st Place/Eugie Terrace.

7. Vehicular access onto 21st Place/Eugie Terrace shall be limited to a singular
access point.

8. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

9. Bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.25 spaces per unit, up
to a maximum of 50 spaces shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic
racks and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, or through secure parking storage area/s, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the
Master Plan.




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025

10. A minimum of 10 percent of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include
standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided on the site. The station
shall include but not be limited to: standard repair tools affixed to the station; a
tire gauge and pump; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and
wheels to spin freely while making adjustments to the bike, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department

12. A minimum of 10% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
(EV) Installed Infrastructure, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas located on properties for uses such as residential common areas, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

14. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

15. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

16. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
Program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

17. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

18. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.




Staff Report: Z-100-24-3
July 2, 2025

19. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

Writer
Matteo Moric
July 2, 2025

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Zoning Sketch Map
Aerial Sketch Map
Site Plan date stamped June 16, 2025
Elevations date stamped June 16, 2025 (2 pages)
Renderings date stamped June 16, 2025
Landscape Plan date stamped June 27, 2025




VOLTAIRE AVE


21ST WAY




R1-10 EUGIE TER



R-3 SP
Z-SP-23-90
PRESIDIO RD
R-4 *
21 S
Z-31-83
TP RD

20TH ST
L


CAVE CREEK
CA
R1-8
MI
NO
DE LO

22ND ST
S RANCH O


R-3
R-3 C-2 R1-8
AVENIDA DEL ORO TEDDY LN

WILLOW
AVE

R1-6
C-3*
Z-74-16


¯ Miles
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
UNION HILLS DR
BELL RD
GREENWAY RD
Z-100-24-3

0 0.02 0.04 0.09
THUNDERBIRD RD
CACTUS RD
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE SHEA BLVD




SCOTTSDALE RD
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3
16TH ST 40TH ST

24TH ST TATUM BLVD

32ND ST 56TH ST
64TH ST

REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Rezio, LLC
FROM:
DATE:
11/15/2024 R-3 ( 1.01 ac.)
APPLICATION NO: Z-100-24-3 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
R-5 ( 1.01 ac.)
1.01Acres QS 32-32 L-9
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
R-3 14 17
R-5 44 52
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 219
S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-100-24.aprx
VOLTAIRE AVE


21ST WAY




R1-10 EUGIE TER



R-3 SP
Z-SP-23-90
PRESIDIO RD
R-4 *
21 S
Z-31-83
TP RD

20TH ST
L


CAVE CREEK
CA
R1-8
MI
NO
DE LO

22ND ST
S RANCH O


R-3
R-3 C-2 R1-8
AVENIDA DEL ORO TEDDY LN

WILLOW
AVE

R1-6
C-3*
Z-74-16


¯ Miles
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
UNION HILLS DR
BELL RD
GREENWAY RD
Z-100-24-3

0 0.02 0.04 0.09
THUNDERBIRD RD
CACTUS RD
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE SHEA BLVD




SCOTTSDALE RD
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3
16TH ST 40TH ST

24TH ST TATUM BLVD

32ND ST 56TH ST
64TH ST

REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Rezio, LLC
FROM:
DATE:
11/15/2024 R-3 ( 1.01 ac.)
APPLICATION NO: Z-100-24-3 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
R-5 ( 1.01 ac.)
1.01Acres QS 32-32 L-9
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
R-3 14 17
R-5 44 52
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 220
S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-100-24.aprx
SITE DATA: SITE PLAN NOTES (AS APPLICABLE):
PARCEL SIZE: 42017 SQUARE FEET GROSS
0.96 ACRE 1. DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF THIS SITE WILL CONFORM WITH ALL
VICINITY MAP
32745 SQUARE FEET NET APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.
0.73 ACRE 2. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE CITY WATER SERVICES AREA AND E Eugie Ter
RD
PROJECT ADDRESS: 13425 N21st Place, Phoenix, AZ 85022 HAS BEEN DESIGNATED AS HAVING AN ASSURED WATER SUPPLY.
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE IV S13R, SPRINKLED 3. ALL NEW OR RELOCATED UTILITIES WILL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. N CAVE CREEK
TED
E PLAN EXISTING-PROPOSED ZONING: R-VACANT 4. STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN A TRIANGLE MEASURED
No R AC EES
R TR DISTAN
CE
FIRE HYDRANT
ER LIPE NT OCCUPANCY: R-RESIDENTIAL BACK 10' FROM THE PROPERTY LINE AND 20' ALONG THE PROPERTY
IE T
FDC
rth 2" CA UIVALA HER E Eugie Ter
UG 20' EQ EACH OT ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 166-10-045 LINE ON EACH SIDE OF DRIVEWAYS ENTRANCES WILL BE
21 EE FROM
st MAINTAINED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 3'. SITE
SITE
Pl LITY
VISIBI LE LOT COVERAGE 5. STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN A TRIANGLE MEASURING 33' RD
TRIANG0')
X 33' ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT A N 21st Pl
N CAVE CREEK
(10'X2 TY LINE
PROPER LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED: 50% OF NET SQUARE FOOTAGE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 3'. FDC
T) ITY LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED: 13344 COVERED SF/ 32745 NET 6. ANY LIGHTING WILL BE PLACED SO AS TO DIRECT LIGHT AWAY FROM Ln E Teddy Ln
ES IBIL E
T(W VIS IANGL PROPERTY SF= (42% COVERAGE) ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND WILL NOT EXCEED ONE-
58' AN TR 'X20')
GOLD COLORED
DR
DECOMPOSED GRANITE THAT
HY (10 Y
CLOSELY RESEMBLES THE
FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. NO NOISE, ODOR, OR
IRE
NATURAL DECOMPOSED
ENTR
OF MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED: 48' FROM FINISH FLOOR TO PARAPET VIBRATION WILL BE EMITTED AT ANY LEVEL EXCEEDING THE
GRANITE GROUND COVER
PROPERTY LINE




ET N N.T.S.
NC
DIS
TA 47'-9" TOP GENERAL LEVEL OF NOISE, ODOR, OR VIBRATION EMITTED BY USES
36 PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: 46'-6" FROM STILT FLOOR TO IN THE AREA OUTSIDE OF THE SITE.
10' - 0"
ED BSL
PARAPET TOP 7. OWNERS OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY WILL
SITE INFORMATION
TRUD CURB
RIA
N 6" EX RETE
CONC 35 5' - 0"
HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING ALL LANDSCAPING
ST
DE S
PE CES LS PARKING REQUIREMENTS: LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH
AC 34 APPROVED PLAN.
HAL
T) 1.5 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT UPTO 2 STORY BUILDING 8. THE EXISTING STRUCTURES MUST COMPLY WITH THE CHANGE OF
(ASP SPACE PER 1.5 X 24 DWELLING UNITS: 36 OCCUPANCY PROVISIONS IN THE LOCAL CONSTRUCTION CODE APN 166-10-045
EWAY
PERGOLA TO
PROVIDE 75%
0"
26' - DRIV
Y
166-10-048A PL SHADE LCON
ST R
AN
T REQUIREMENTS
FOR PEDESTRIAN
BA N
E OF TIO
LIN OJEC
8'-3"
PRIOR TO USE. ADDRESS 13425 N. 21ST PLACE
166-10-039A



YD C PATHWAYS. PR OVE
FD PARKING PROVIDED: 9. AFTER FINAL APPROVAL THE PROJECT WILL BE INSPECTED FOR
H D
E E E AB
LL
21 FIR O B TA 2%
T S
IN MA
COVERED SPACES 31 ZONING COMPLIANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND PRIOR TO MCR 5414
.81
X
H SL
26GOLD COLORED 29
OP
RT
= 2 DECOMPOSED
E
NO L R GRANITE THAT HC SPACES(5% OF TOTAL PARKING) 5 OCCUPANCY. THE APPLICANT IS TO NOTIFY PDD PRIOR TO THE LOT 16
AL 0 CLOSELY RESEMBLES THE
ED 63'-4"
TOTAL PROVIDED 36 OCCUPANCY TO ARRANGE FOR INSPECTIONS. CALL 262-6981 AND
3.4
5' HIGH EXISTING

NATURAL DECOMPOSED D
U TE
UW
32 TR E
GRANITE GROUND COVER
EX CR
33 28
CM L= 6" ON B
C UR
C 6'-6"
18'-0" 26'-0" 18'-0"
REQUEST A DESIGN REVIEW INSPECTION. SUBDIVISION SUN & SAND BLK 1-3
ING
BUILDING FOOTAGE: (OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL) 13344 S.F. TOTAL 10. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT AND SATELLITE DISHES SHALL BE
CHAIN LINK FENCE

IST 31811
27 LOT AREA
IGH
EX
E 32
10'-8"
9'-0" SCREENED TO THE HEIGHT OF THE TALLEST EQUIPMENT. SF/ 0.73 ACRE
6' H LIN TRASH
ENCLOSURE BUILDING SETBACK REQUIRED: 11. ALL SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED TO CONCEAL TRASH
FRONT(21ST. Pl): 20' CONTAINERS, LOADING DOCKS, TRANSFORMERS, BACKFLOW
DRIVEWAY (ASPHALT)




54'-3"
TY
197.68'
31 26
ER ZIP 85022
SIDES(EAST) : 10' PREVENTERS, AND OTHER MECHANICAL OR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
ALLEY
TH) CONCRETE
OU OP TURF REAR(SOUTHEAST) : 15' FROM EYE LEVEL ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC STREETS. R-3 REZONING TO R-5
350 NT(S SIN 25 ZONING
PR 20'-0"
' BA 12. BARBED, RAZOR, OR CONCERTINA WIRE (OR SIMILAR) SHALL NOT BE
139'-11"
RA K COMMON AREA LINE OF BALCONY
ION
EH
YD
NT
AC
TB (TURF+BBQ AREA)
PROJECTION ABOVE
66'-5 1/2"
LANDSCAPE SETBACKS: USED ON THIS SITE WHERE VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS OR
2246 SQFT
FIR
TE SE
ADJACENT TO STREET(FRONT): 20' ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
SHEET INDEX
RE PE ENTRY
CE
TO
CA
DS
LOBBY
CONCRETE
ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE 13. ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES A SEPARATE REVIEW AND PERMIT.
BBQ
25'-0
" TAN BS
L&
'-0
" LAN
AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 LOBBY
7 8'-0" 8'-0" (SIDES AND REAR) : 5' 14. SMOKE, GAS, AND ODOR EMISSIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH
LS
DIS
24 ROW REGULATION III OF THE MARICOPA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION
18'-0"
PARKING 2% MAX
RO

25'-0
" (ASPHALT) SLOPE 2% MAX
SLOPE
COMMON AREA : 5% OF THE GROSS SITE AREA CONTROL RULES AND REGULATIONS.
W 9'-0"
COMMON AREA REQUIRED 15. THE DISPOSAL OF ALL WASTE MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH SHEET NO. SHEET NAME
2" CA ( 5% x 42017 SF) : 2101 SF TITLE 9, CHAPTER 9, ARTICLES 18 AND 4 OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE
166-10-039C


EXIT 23
6" EXTRUDED
20' EQLIPER TR

CONCRETE
C1.0 SITE PLAN
26'-0
"
CURB
PROVIDED COMMON AREA : 2272 SF REGULATIONS AS ADOPTED BY THE ARIZONA HEALTH DEPARTMENT.
DRIVEWAY
PROPERTY LINE




PL DRIVEWAY (ASPHALT) 22 DENSITY CALCULATION : DWELLING UNITS/GROSS AREA=24/0.98=25 16. THE AVERAGE NOISE LEVEL, MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE, A1.0 DESIGN PLAN
FRO UIVALA EES PL

(ASPHALT)
INE LINE OF
63'-4" 26'-0"
SHALL NOT EXCEED 44 DB (1DN) WHEN MEASURED ON "A WEIGHTED"
BALCONY
1ST PROJECTION
ABOVE
YL
M NT ANTE
ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES : ZONE TO EAST IS C-2, ZONE TO SOUND LEVEL METER AND ACCORDING TO THE PROCEDURES OF A2.0 BUILDING ELEVATION
PRO EACH OTH DISTANCE
TH 2
D
ERT NORTH,SOUTH & WEST ARE R-3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
A2.0 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS : LOCATED AT THE N/E CORNER OF N 21ST PL ,58 17. EXPLOSIVE OR HAZARDOUS PROCESSES (IF APPLICABLE):
NOR
P ER
8 9 10 4'-3" 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
FEET WEST OF PROPERTY LINE. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
18'-0" LOT SALES : NO PREVENTION BUREAU THAT ALL MANUFACTURING, STORAGE AND
PARKING
44'-11" (ASPHALT)
0" L
9'-0" '- S
15 R B PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OPTION : MULTIFAMILY WASTE PROCESSES ON THE SITE SHALL MEET SAFETY AND
5' HIGH EXIS
A
PAVED AREA RE
ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS AS ADMINISTERED BY THE BUREAU.
CHAIN LINK TING
153'-3"
10'-0" BSL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 18. ALL NEW SANITARY SEWER LINES WITHIN THE SITE SHALL BE
FENCE PRIVATE PLUMBING LINES SUBJECT TO THE LOCAL PLUMBING CODE
5'-0" LS
0"
'-
PROPERTY LINE 10 THE WEST 203.76 FEET OF NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF OR THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (ADEQ)
5' HIGH EXISTING
CHAIN LINK FENCE 216.96' THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, AQUIFER PROTECTION PROGRAM (APP) GENERAL PERMIT 4.01 IN
2" CALIPER TREES PLANTED 20' TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH,RANGE 3 EAST,OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND ACCORDANCE WITH ARIZONA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 18,
C1.0
Site Plan
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"

166-10-039A EQUIVALANT DISTANCE FROM
EACH OTHER MERIDIAN,MARICOPA COUNTY,ARIZONA, INCLUDING THAT PORTION THEREOF CHAPTER 9, SECTION E301 (AAC R18-9-E301) WHICHEVER IS AREA CALCULATION
WHICH LIES WITHIN THE CONTENTION MINING CLAIM IN THE WINIFRED MINING APPLICABLE.
DISTRICT. 19. THE SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM WITHIN THIS PROJECT
SCALE BAR 1:100
EXCEPT THE WEST 33 FEET; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET THEREOF. WILL BE A PRIVATE SYSTEM, OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE
GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES SPRINKLERS NOTES PROPERTY OWNER(S) OR ASSOCIATION. THE SYSTEM WILL BE
AREA EXIST (SF) DEMO (SF) ADD (SF) REM (SF) TOTAL (SF)
0 5 10 15 20 PROPERTY OWNER CONTACT: REVIEWED AND INSPECTED BY THE BUILDING SAFETY SECTION OF PARKING 14110 14110
1. 903.1 GENERAL. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
1. UNDEVELOPED AREAS: RETENTION FOR 100-YR NETZACH INVESTMENTS LLC THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BRET 1ST LEVEL 12473
RECYCLE 2. HRÒ. DEVELOPED AREAS: RETENTION FOR THE 4401 E MARION WY PHOENIX AZ USA 85018 20. ALL ON-SITE WATER LINES, SHALL BE PRIVATE PLUMBING LINES
TARVER SPRINKLER ORDINANCE. AN APPROVED
ADDITION GREATER BTWN "PRE-VS-POST" AND "FIRST FLUSH". SUBJECT TO THE LOCAL PLUMBING CODE. 2ND LEVEL 12473
6" THICK AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE
3. CROSS RETENTION AND DRAINAGE AGREEMENT DESIGN PROFESSIONAL/APPLICANT CONTACT: 21. SURFACE DRAINAGE SHALL BE DIVERTED TO A STORM SEWER
CONCRETE SLAB INSTALLED THROUGHOUT ALL LEVELS OF ALL
10' - 0" REQD IF RETENTION AND DRAINAGE CROSSES 3RD LEVEL 12473
NEW GROUP A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R-1, R-2, R-4 AND S Randall Scott Marks- Rezio CONVEYANCE OR OTHER APPROVED POINT OF COLLECTION THAT
6'-0" GATE WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 2537 E. Mercer Lane DOES NOT CREATE A HAZARD.
OCCUPANCIES OF ANY SIZE AND THROUGHOUT
180 HINGE 4. PROVIDE DRAINAGE REPORT IF SITE IS TAKING 480-695-5927 22. LOTS SHALL BE GRADED TO DRAIN SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM
ALL GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES INCLUDING ONE-
4" CONC. CURB OFFSITE FLOWS, IF NOT, PROVIDE DRAINAGE MEMO. pm@reziopro.com FOUNDATION WALLS. THE GRADE SHALL FALL A MINIMUM OF 6
AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS BUILT UNDER THE
5. NO SWMP REQUIRED, SITE IS UNDER 1 ACRE. SHOW INCHES WITHIN THE FIRST 10 FEET. (2012 IRC R401.3)
3'-0" PEDESTRIN
PROTECTION OF ANY EXISTING DRAINAGE FACILITIES
INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, AND GROUP FIRE HYDRANTS 23. 50% OF COMMON AREA WILL BE SHADED AND INCLUDE A BARBECUE
U OCCUPANCIES OF MORE THAN 5,000 SQUARE
ON G&D PLAN. 1. PRIMARY FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE N/E CORNER OF N 21ST PL &
6 ' - 0"
ACCES GATE AND GRASS AREA TO ACCOMMODATE 2 AMENITIES. TOTAL (SF) 57144 13344
FEET (464 M2)
6. RETENTION AREA SLOPE WILL NOT EXCEED 4:1 PER E EUGIE TERRACE ,58 FEET WEST OF PROPERTY LINE. 24. USEABLE PUBLIC SPACE AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS WILL BE
4 CY FRONT
2. THE CALCULATED AREA OF GROUP R-3
LOAD OR 3 CY
LOD BIN SECTION 507 TAB A 2. SECONDARY FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED AT N/W CORNER OF N 21ST PL SHADED A MINIMUM OF 50%.
4" SAFETY POST PER OCCUPANCIES SHALL INCLUDE ALL LIVABLE
AND E TEDDY LANE,350 FEET SOUTH OF PROPERTY LINE
1' - 0"
FIGURE E PRELIM G&D GENERAL GUIDELINES SPACE AND THE AREA OF ANY ATTACHED
3. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE SPACED APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET APART
25. I CONSENT TO THE REPRODUCTION OF THIS SITE PLAN PROVIDED
THAT IF MODIFICATIONS ARE MADE, THE PROFESSIONALS WHO MAKE
LOT (SF) LOT COV MAX ACTUAL
GARAGE AND CARPORTS OR AREAS LOCATED
IN SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TYPES. THE DISTANCE SUCH CHANGES ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR
32745 14110 R-5 43%
ENCLOSURE WITH 4CY RECYCLE BIN 1. MAX RETENTION DEPTH WITHIN 10 FT OF ROW IS 18 UNDER LIVING SPACES. SF/ 0.73 MF
BETWEEN HYDRANTS SHALL BE MEASURED ALONG THE PATH OF THE THE MODIFIED PORTIONS OF THE PLAN. ACRE
4 ' - 0" 4 ' - 0" 4 ' - 0" 3 ' - 0" 3 ' - 0"
1.6'-0" WIDE COMPRTMENT TO ACCOMODATE A 4CY INCHES AND WITHIN 20 FT OF ROW IS 24 INCHES. 3. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SHALL BE
FRONT LOAD BIN OR A 3 CY REAR LOD BIN. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD. 26. ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES SEPARATE APPROVALS AND PERMITS.
BASIN SIDE SLOPE SHALL NOT BEGIN CLOSER THAN 2 INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13 FOR
4. PRIMARY FIRE HYDRANT IS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE FIRE
SCOPE
12 ' - 0" 6 ' - 0"
2.THIS DESIGN CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF TWO
FT FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK. IF NO SIDEWALK, STORM GROUP A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R-1, R-2, R-4 AND S 27. IN THE LANDSCAPE SETBACKS PLANTED WITH MINIMUM 2-INCH
SEPERATE STANDARD ENCLOSURE FOR A MAX. 4
DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. CALIPER, LARGE CANOPY, SHADE TREES, PLANTED 20 FEET ON
CY CAPACITY FOR RECYCLE.
WATER STORAGE NO CLOSER THAN 7 FT FROM BACK OCCUPANCIES. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
5. FIRE HYDRANT TO BE INSTALLED AND PUT IT ON THE STREET NEXT TO CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS, AND SHRUBS, ACCENTS,
OF CURB. SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
OUR PROPERTY. THIS CAN COVER 1 OF THE 2 FIRE HYDRANTS WE AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS EVENLY DISTRIBUTED
5'-0" MIN 1:12 2. ADA ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, PARKING SPACES AND NFPA 13R FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES UP TO
1:12 NEED. THROUGHOUT THE LANDSCAPE AREAS TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF
ACCESS AISLES MEET SLOPE REQUIREMENTS: 1:50 AND INCLUDING FOUR STORIES IN HEIGHT, IN - DEMO EXISTING LOT
SIDEWALK SLOPE SLOPE (2%) MAX CROSS SLOPES AND 1:12 MAX LONGITUDINAL GROUPS R-1, R-2, R-4 OCCUPANCIES AND NFPA GENERAL 50% LIVE COVERAGE. - RE-ZONE TO R-5
-CONSTRUCT A 4 STORY BUILDING WITH
SLOPES. 13D FOR ONE- AND TWOFAMILY DWELLINGS AND 1. LIGHTING TO BE DETERMINED POST-REZONING 28. ALL BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS 1 STORY FOR PARKING,
3. WALLS AND WALL FOOTINGS CANNOT BE IN PUBLIC MOBILE HOMES IN GROUP R-3 AND R-4 2. ON-STREET LOADING SHALL BE ALLOWED ADJACENT TO THE SITE (INCLUDING SIDEWALKS) ARE SHADED BY A STRUCTURE, AND AN ADDITIONAL 3 WITH 8 UNITS PER FLOOR
-TOTALOF 24 UNITS TO BE CONSTRUCTED
6" CURB ROW, ALLEY, SIDEWALK/WATER/SEWER EASEMENTS. OCCUPANCIES WITH SIX TO 10 LICENSED BEDS. IF ADEQUATE RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION LANDSCAPING, OR A COMBINATION OF THE TWO TO PROVIDE A -ALL UNITS TO BE 2 BEDROOM, 2 BATH
INTERNATIONAL PARKING 4. ALL DEVELOPMENTS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO HAVE EXCEPTIONS TO OR REDUCTIONS IN CODE AND THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM FOR FIRE ACCESS, PUBLIC MINIMUM OF 75% SHADE.
STRIPING SYMBOL WITH BLUE AND POSITIVE OUTFALL TO ADJACENT STREETS ONCE THE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR THE CIRCULATION, AND ACCESS TO UTILITIES.
YELLOW COLORS PARKING ON-SITE STORM WATER STORAGE BASINS ARE FILLED. INSTALLATION OF RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER
18'-0" COLORS TO BE LIVABLE GRAVEL E ELECTRICAL METER STREET PROPERTY LINE
ACCESSIBLE AN ADDITIONAL 25% RETENTION VOLUME FOR THE SYSTEMS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CONTRASTING IN NATURE NFPA 13R AND NFPA 13D UNLESS SPECIFICALLY
DESIGN STORM EVENT WILL BE REQD WHEN OUTFALL LIVABLE (2ND STORY) GRASS 200 ELECTRICAL PANEL (AMPS) HOUSE BOUNDARY SETBACK
IS NOT TO PUBLIC ROW OR PUBLIC DRAINAGE ALLOWED BY THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 5' 10' 20' 40'
EASEMENT. CODE. EXCEPTIONS TO OR REDUCTIONS IN CODE ADDITION UNCOVERED PATIO G GAS METER ROOF LINE WALL/FENCE
REQUIREMENTS FOR NFPA 13 SYSTEMS
ALLOWED IN THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE GARAGE ASPHALT W WATER METER VEGETATION
11'-0" 5'-0"
ARE ALLOWED. SCALE BAR 1"=10'
16'-0" PAVERS WALKWAY AC AC UNIT EXISTING CONTOUR
SEAL CITY APPROVAL
Contractor must verify all imensions at project before proceeding with
SHEET TITLE SITE PLAN SHEET NO: C1.0 work. Dimensions intended for general permit use within +/- 1", anything
 requiring tighter tolerances requires field verification. These documents
are instruments of professional service and the information contained
PROJECT NAME NETZACH CONCEPT PLAN SCALE As indicated  within is incomplete unless used in conjunction with Rezio LLC. Use or

reproduction of these documents in whole or in part without written
conset of Rezio LLC is in violation of common law, copyrights, statutes KIVA # 24-655
13425 N21st Place and other reserved rights. These plans are on notice as copyrighted
PROJECT ADDRESS  property of Rezio LLC. SDEV # 2400207
N 
PHOENIX, AZ 85022 
It is the responsibility of the contractor to check and verify all field
conditions prior to construction, handle all inspections and work related PAPP # 2402587
 to inspector comments, and all dimensions, quantities and coordination
CLIENT NAME NETZACH INVESTMENTS LLC DATE 06.05.2025  of trades on the construction site.
TOP OF RROF: 47'-0"
THIRD FLOOR FFE.: 33'-0"
SECOND FLOOR FFE.: 22'-0"
FIRST FLOOR FFE.: 11'-0"
STILT FLOOR: 0'-0"
A2.0
SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'
TOP OF RROF: 47'-0"
THIRD FLOOR FFE.: 33'-0"
SECOND FLOOR FFE.: 22'-0"
FIRST FLOOR FFE.: 11'-0"
STILT FLOOR: 0'-0"
FLOORPLAN NTS
N
A2.0
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'
W
E
EXTERIOR FINISH ROOFING CALLOUTS UTILITIES SECTION MATERIALS
STUCCO TILE A WALL TYPE AC AC UNIT CONCRETE FOOTING
BRICK ASPHALT SHINGLE 2668 DOOR SIZE E ELECTRICAL METER ABC GRAVEL
CMU/BLOCK METAL WINDOW SIZE 200 ELECTRICAL PANEL (AMPS) CMU/BLOCK WALL
XO
EXPOSED WOOD SLATE ELEVATION LABELS G GAS METER WOOD
PAINTED METAL WOOD GLASS WALL/FENCE GRADING S
  

   


    
 
  

  
N  
 
 
    

TOP OF RROF: 47'-0"
THIRD FLOOR FFE.: 33'-0"
SECOND FLOOR FFE.: 22'-0"
FIRST FLOOR FFE.: 11'-0"
STILT FLOOR: 0'-0"
A2.0
NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'
TOP OF RROF: 47'-0"
THIRD FLOOR FFE.: 33'-0"
SECOND FLOOR FFE.: 22'-0"
FIRST FLOOR FFE.: 11'-0"
STILT FLOOR: 0'-0"
FLOORPLAN NTS
A2.0
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1' N
W
E
EXTERIOR FINISH ROOFING CALLOUTS UTILITIES SECTION MATERIALS
STUCCO TILE A WALL TYPE AC AC UNIT CONCRETE FOOTING
BRICK ASPHALT SHINGLE 2668 DOOR SIZE E ELECTRICAL METER ABC GRAVEL
CMU/BLOCK METAL WINDOW SIZE 200 ELECTRICAL PANEL (AMPS) CMU/BLOCK WALL
XO
EXPOSED WOOD SLATE ELEVATION LABELS G GAS METER WOOD
PAINTED METAL WOOD GLASS WALL/FENCE GRADING S
  

   


    
 
  

  
N  
 
 
    

NOTE :
USE OF NATURAL TURF WITHIN LANDSCAPE AREAS IS LIMITED
PER WATER CONSERVATION STIPULATIONS AND SECTION 507
TAB A DESIGN GUIDELINES, LIVE COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS
SHOULD BE MET USING DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS AND
VEGETATIVE GROUND COVERS.




TED
PLAN E
r CE EES C
No FIRE HYDRANT RA LIPE
R TR T DISTAN
N
th TER 2" CA UIVALA THER
IE ' E Q H O
UG 20 C
21 EE F R O M EA
st
Pl ILITY
VISIB GLE
TRIAN20')
(10'X NE
RTY LI
PROPE
T) ITY
ES IBIL E
T(W GOLD COLORED
VIS IANGL
58' AN DECOMPOSED GRANITE THAT
DR CLOSELY RESEMBLES THE
TR 'X20')
HY (10 NATURAL DECOMPOSED
IRE RY GRANITE GROUND COVER
F ENT
E TO
NC
TA
DIS
10' - 0"
ED RB BSL
TRUD CU
6" EX RETE
N CONC 35
RIA 5' - 0"
ST
DE S LS
PE CES
AC
PROPERTY LINE

AL T)
PERGOLA TO
SPH
PROVIDE 75%
Y (A
SHADE 0" EWA NY
PL T LCO
166-10-048A REQUIREMENTS 26' - DRIV BA
AN OF ION
R FOR PEDESTRIAN LINEOJECT
YD ED PATHWAYS. 8'-3"
H D C D E PR OVE
U
ST AB
E E LE
L FD TR ET
R 2%
FIR O B TA C
EX
T S N
21 6"
O B MA
IN C R X
U
H C SLO
.81 PE
RT 26 COLORED 29
= 2 GOLD
DECOMPOSED GRANITE THAT
LL R CLOSELY RESEMBLES THE
63'-4"
NO
WA NATURAL DECOMPOSED
.40 GRANITE GROUND COVER
166-10-039A
MU =3 33 26'-0" 28 18'-0"
GC L 5' HIGH EXISTING
TIN
EX IS 27
IGH E 32 9'-0"
TRASH
CHAIN LINK FENCE
ENCLOSURE
6' H LIN
Y 197.68'
RT 31 26
CONCRETE
TH)
OP
(SO E TURF
U SIN 25
350' T 30
ALLEY
AN PR BA
DR COMMON AREA LINE OF BALCONY
ION SE PROJECTION ABOVE
HY 139'-11"
(TURF+BBQ AREA)
DRIVEWAY (ASPHALT)
NT TB
AC
IRE TE K 2246 SQFT
OF RE ENTRY
LAN
ET
DS CONCRETE
25'-0 '-0 BBQ
"
CA
" TAN BS
C 8'-0" 8'-0"
L&
PE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
LS
AREA
DIS
ROW
PARKING 2% MAX 24
25'-0 (ASPHALT) SLOPE
" 2% MAX
SLOPE
RO
W


6" EXTRUDED 23
CONCRETE
CURB
2" C
A 26'-0
" DRIVEWAY
INE
PL 20' E LIPER T
(ASPHALT) DRIVEWAY (ASPHALT) 22
Q R
EXIT
1ST 166-10-039C
FRO UIVALA EES PLA
YL
M EA N N 21
PAVED AREA
TH 2 ERT
CH O T DISTA TED

8 9 10 4'-3" 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
THE NCE
R
NOR P
PROPERTY LINE
PARKING
PRO
44'-11" (ASPHALT)

0" L
'- S
15 R B
A
RE
153'-3"
5' HIGH EX
IST
10'-0" BSL
5'-0" LS
CHAIN LIN ING
0"
'-
K FENCE
5' HIGH EXISTING
CHAIN LINK FENCE PROPERTY LINE
LANDSCAPE PLAN 2" CALIPER TREES PLANTED 20'
A1.0 166-10-039A EQUIVALANT DISTANCE FROM
SCALE: 1/16"=1'
EACH OTHER
216.96'




  

   


    
 
  

  
N  
 
 
    





ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-100-24-3


Date of VPC Meeting July 7, 2025
Request From R-3
Request To R-5
Proposal Multifamily residential
Location Southeast corner of 21st Place and Eugie Terrace
VPC Recommendation Denial, with direction
VPC Vote 9-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

One member of the public registered to speak on this item

Staff Presentation
Matteo Moric, staff, provided an overview of the proposal. Mr. Moric described the
location of the proposal and identified the rezoning request. Mr. Moric explained the
proposal was not consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of Residential
5 to 15 dwelling units per acre, but that it did not require a general plan amendment
since it is smaller than 10 acres in size. Mr. Moric shared the land use map showing the
areas to the north, south, and west are designated Residential 5 to 15 dwelling units per
acre and to the east is designated Commercial. Mr. Moric then showed an aerial photo
noting the surrounding land uses and zoning, the proposed site plan and noted how the
building will be four stories and would cantilever over the parking area and have
architectural balconies which were shared in the 3-D renderings. Mr. Moric stated staff
recommended approval subject to stipulations and went over the findings and
stipulations. Mr. Moric explained the next steps and dates for the Planning Commission
and City Council meetings.

Applicant Presentation
Randy Marks, the applicant with Rezio, LLC, stated the overall goal of the project was
to provide more housing in a multifamily space. Mr. Marks noted the site was a unique
property with the street curving along the front. Mr. Marks said the plan is to build
twenty-four 2-bedroom, 2-bath units with one- and one-half parking spaces per unit. Mr.
Marks said the design would allow for parking to sit underneath the living structure with
elevators and stairs. Mr. Marks felt this presented a nice view of the area and was a
well-oriented building. Mr. Marks indicated that this is near other multifamily sites and
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 226
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-100-24-3

next to commercial zoning, and this would provide an opportunity for people working in
the area to have nearby housing. Mr. Marks said he was rezoning to the R-5 zoning
district because unlike R-3 zoning it would allow for 24 units and the development could
include a 4-story building. Mr. Marks added the design of the building incorporates
modern architecture and it advances housing and provides green communal areas. Mr.
Marks noted there is a nice grass and barbeque area within the project location. Mr.
Marks also stated the uniquely shaped lot plans to have a large 20-foot landscaped
area with enhanced trees and shade making the site appealing. Mr. Marks said the goal
is for each unit to have balconies and 32 shaded parking spots, access to trash and
recycling, and bicycle parking. Mr. Marks explained the community outreach efforts and
sign postings. Mr. Marks noted there was a citizen participation report and said they
would be available for continued community engagement. Mr. Marks said he wanted
access with two driveways and based on trip generation it was very minimal impact on
the traffic in the area.

Questions from the Committee
Regina Schmidt asked if the community was going to be gated in and out. Mr. Marks
said yes, it would be gated to restrict entry and exit.

Robert Goodhue asked if a study was done on if the units would be occupied by
families. Mr. Marks said there was not a specific demographics study of who would be
renting the units yet. Mr. Goodhue had concerns that there was no extra parking for
guests and thought people would need to park along the streets, which he was not a big
fan of.

Ms. Schmidt asked if the project was designed for rent or for purchase. Mr. Marks
replied they were initially designed for rent.

Ms. Schmidt questioned what the height of the project was. Jennifer Hall clarified it
was listed as 46 feet 6 inches tall in the staff report.

Larissa Balderrama asked what type of development was across the street. Mr. Marks
thought it was multifamily. Daniel Mazza clarified there was an elderly care facility like a
retirement community across the street on the west side.

Robert Gubser asked what the maximum height was allowed in the current R-3 zoning
district. Jennifer Hall responded it is 2 stories and 30 feet.

Public Comments
Richard Bocardo, resident at 13435 North 21st Street, expressed concerns. Mr.
Bocardo’s first concern was related to the number of units listed on the posting sign
from 17 to 52 units. Mr. Bocardo indicated the whole neighborhood is one story for the
most part and this proposal will be totally different from the whole neighborhood and
had concerns that it would have balconies all around. Mr. Bocardo said he lived to the
north and had a swimming pool and felt he would lose his privacy with there being a 4-
story building. Mr. Bocardo described some of the properties around there as being
single family and he explained some of the other uses such as townhomes, a trailer

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 227
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-100-24-3

park and apartment complexes. Mr. Bocardo added there were some nearby units
which were already visually intruding into his yard where he had to put shades up to
ensure people on the second floors could not visually intrude on his property. Mr.
Bocardo also had concerns about traffic indicating there was a church and other
multifamily projects having lots of parking issues in the neighborhood. Mr. Bocardo said
he was glad something was going to be built because the site had been an eyesore. Mr.
Bocardo said there was no 3 or 4-story buildings on this block. Mr. Bocardo said when
he bought the house in 1983 it was a very peaceful and quiet area and this would be a
lot more traffic and reduce his privacy. Mr. Bocardo summed up his concerns as the
height, lack of privacy, the increase in traffic and why the posting sign said up to 52
units were permitted.

Applicant Response
Mr. Marks said the maximum possible number of units listed on the sign posting is 52
units in the R-5 zoning district; however, they intend to build only 24 units and have a
stipulation for such. Mr. Marks said there would not be enough room for parking to have
52 units. Mr. Marks noted he would be willing to chat with Mr. Bocardo and share the
traffic study, he said without the height they would not be able to get 24 units. Mr. Marks
said it was designed as an “L” shape so it was not intrusive on the street. Mr. Marks
said the balconies and building were a distance from the street and many more feet
from Mr. Bocardo’s property. Mr. Marks said the intent of the project was not to
overhang over people’s backyards, but the opportunity for people to live in a nice livable
space.

Mr. Bocardo wanted to understand the next steps. Chair Mortensen reminded the
group that this was just an advisory committee, and the recommendation would go onto
Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Bocardo said that there is a slope in the
area making the views even more intrusive into his property. Mr. Bocardo stated the site
is an eyesore because no one takes care of the landscaping and maintains the
property.

Committee Discussion
Ms. Hall said it was a very nice-looking project, but she was concerned with the height
of 46 feet 6 inches and four stories. Ms. Hall understood it was a challenging site.

Ms. Sepic said this was a well-designed project but felt it would be better suited for the
midtown area than this site.

Ms. Marcolla asked about the surrounding zoning. Mr. Marks stated the properties to
the west were multifamily, directly south multifamily, north is residential, and to the east
is commercial.

Chair Mortensen liked the design and layout, but thought the height was too much and
two stories would have been nice.

Daniel Mazza asked if three stories would be 36 feet tall. Ms. Hall said yes and she
would feel more comfortable with that.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 228
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-100-24-3


Mr. Marks said they had accommodated for over 2,000 square feet of common space
required in front of the 20-foot landscape buffer, 36 parking spaces, grassy areas, trees,
barbeque and bicycle parking spaces.

Ms. Sepic asked if the parking was at grade. Mr. Marks replied it was at grade and they
want access to stairwells and elevators so it functions as a nice place to live.

Mr. Gubser asked if the R-5 zoning would allow other uses other than multifamily. Mr.
Moric indicated it would allow some other uses such as office and other restricted
commercial uses. Mr. Gubser shared concern that the applicant could later come in for
a Planning Hearing Officer (PHO) case to change the plans and allow commercial uses.

Ms. Hall asked if there was any opportunity to take a continuance and reduce the height
of the building. Mr. Marks said it had taken several renditions already to get it at the
height it is proposed at. Mr. Marks noted to get the parking it is difficult to reduce the
height, but Mr. Marks thought maybe with lower ceilings they could get it down to 40
feet.

Ms. Marcolla suggested a line-of-sight diagram to see how the views are from the
upper floors.

Ms. Hall said she was inclined to deny the request unless the applicant wanted a
continuance.

Motion
Jennifer Hall motioned to recommend denial of Z-100-24-3 with direction to reduce the
building height. Anna Sepic seconded the motion.

Vote
9-1; motion to recommend denial of Z-100-24-3 with direction passes with Committee
members Balderrama, Goodhue, Gubser, Hall, Marcolla, Mazza, Schmidt, Sepic, and
Mortensen in favor; and Soronson in opposition.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 229
ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
AUGUST 7, 2025

ITEM NO: 10
DISTRICT NO.: 3
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-100-24-3
Location: Southeast corner of 21st Place and Eugie Terrace
From: R-3
To: R-5
Acreage: 1.01
Proposal: Multifamily residential
Applicant: Randy Marks, Rezio, LLC
Owner: Amit Netzach, Netzach Investments, LLC
Representative: Randy Marks, Rezio, LLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 7/7/2025 Denial, with direction. Vote: 9-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Z-100-24-3, per the staff
recommendation.

Maker: Matthews
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 6-2 (Chairperson Busching, Hu)
Absent: Jaramillo
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. As stipulated, the proposal provides enhanced shading and trees to be a compatible
addition to the surrounding neighborhood.

2. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses.

3. As stipulated, the proposal supports efforts from various plans, such as the Shade
Phoenix Plan, the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, the Transportation Electrification
Action Plan, and the Phoenix Climate Action Plan.

Stipulations:

1. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 24 units.



2. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date stamped
June 16, 2025, as modified by the following stipulations and approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

3. The required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings; and shrubs,
accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the landscape
areas to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

4. All bicycle infrastructure and pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks) shall be shaded
by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75%
shade, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

6. A minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk shall be constructed on the east/south side of 21st
Place/Eugie Terrace.

7. Vehicular access onto 21st Place/Eugie Terrace shall be limited to a singular access
point.

8. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

9. Bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.25 spaces per unit, up to a
maximum of 50 spaces shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic racks and
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, or
through secure parking storage area/s, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in
Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

10. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

11. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided on the site. The station shall
include but not be limited to: standard repair tools affixed to the station; a tire gauge
and pump; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely
while making adjustments to the bike, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department

12. A minimum of 10% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle (EV)
Installed Infrastructure, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

13. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin, and only
allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf areas located on
properties for uses such as residential common areas, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
14. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf areas to
reduce water waste.

15. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by structures or by
minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a combination thereof.

16. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that demonstrates a
commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup Program for a minimum of
10 years, or as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

17. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater
management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This includes but is not limited
to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales, permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater
Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for
Alternative Stormwater Management.

18. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

19. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 waiver of
claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder's Office
and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file for record.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Saneeya Mir at 602-686-6461, saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




ATTACHMENT E

CITY OF PHOENIX
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

FORM TO REQUEST PC to CC
I HEREBY REQUEST THAT THE CC HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON:

APPLICATION NO/ Z-100-24-3 (SIGNATURE ON ORIGINAL IN FILE)
LOCATION opposition X applicant
Southeast corner of
21st Place and
Eugie Terrace

APPEALED FROM: PC 8/7/2025 13435 North 21st Place
Phoenix AZ 85022


PC DATE STREET/ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
TO PC/CC CC 9/3/2025 Ricardo Bocardo
HEARING 602-330-1905
Rcb9line@aol.com


CC DATE NAME / PHONE / EMAIL
REASON FOR REQUEST:

Opposition to Application – See Attached.




RECEIVED BY: 8/14/2025 RECEIVED ON: Dom Amodio

Joshua Bednarek Dalia Adams
Tricia Gomes Camryn Thompson/Teresa Garcia
Racelle Escolar Micah Alexander
Sarah Stockham GIS
Adam Stranieri Byron Easton (for PHO appeals only)
Heather Klotz Village Planner - Robert Kuhfuss
Stephanie Vasquez Applicant




REVISED 10/16/2024 vcm
ATTACHMENT F

From: Bruce Weber
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Support of Zoning Case Z-100-24-3
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 5:50:20 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious   ‌


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I'm writing in support of Zoning Case Z-100-24-3, which will bring 24 much-needed homes
to the Paradise Valley Village. This rezoning allows for a moderately sized apartment
community that fits the area’s character and serves as a thoughtful transition between
nearby commercial and residential uses.

This is exactly the kind of well-designed, neighborhood-scale housing that Phoenix needs.
It offers homes within reach for more individuals and families, meeting demand while
enhancing the neighborhood.

We need more housing options like this to ensure that everyone in Phoenix has a place to
call home. I respectfully urge you to support this rezoning.

Sincerely,

Bruce Weber
4628 E Berneil Dr
Phoenix, AZ 85028




From: Sarah Amaral CFRE
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Amanda Straight
Subject: Support for Z-100-24-3 21st Place and Eugie Terrace
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 12:57:09 PM
Attachments: firstplaceicon-emailgreenbackground_9f09191c-9984-4267-bbcb-169b7026a193.png
1_9cd01675-c4ea-4a80-9732-ddffb230bb07.png
5_07e5fbfe-80bb-41d0-af98-e074ed5778da.png
2_70a09438-1177-4cfd-8796-b9aa72a050b6.png
4_cba3eafa-56b6-4be6-a987-46cafead6cd4.png
firstplaceemailsignaturebanner_16af16b4-2a44-4916-8bf2-0d993d4f3ca9.png




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I'm writing in support of Zoning Case Z-100-24-3, which will bring 24 much-needed
homes to the Paradise Valley Village. This rezoning allows for a moderately sized
apartment community that fits the area’s character and serves as a thoughtful transition
between nearby commercial and residential uses.

This is exactly the kind of well-designed, neighborhood-scale housing that Phoenix
needs. It offers homes within reach for more individuals and families, meeting demand
while enhancing the neighborhood.

We need more housing options like this to ensure that everyone in Phoenix has a place
to call home. I respectfully urge you to support this rezoning.

Sincerely,
Sarah Amaral
1941 E El Parque Dr.
Tempe, AZ 85282




Sarah Amaral CFRE
Director of Development, First Place AZ
p: 602-464-6630 c: 602-697-5352
e: samaral@firstplaceaz.org | [yourdomain.url]firstplaceaz.org
[firstplaceaz.org]



3001 N. Third St., Phoenix, AZ 85012


[facebook.com] [linkedin.com] [instagram.com]
[firstplaceaz.org] [youtube.com]




[azmvdnow.gov]

First Place AZ is a qualified Arizona Charitable Tax Credit Organization. Your gift may qualify
for a dollar-for-dollar credit on your Arizona state taxes—up to $495 for individuals and $987 for
married couples filing jointly. Learn more at firstplaceglobal.org/donate [firstplaceglobal.org].




From: Tom Kelly
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Fwd: Support for Z-100-24-3. 21st Place and Eugie Terrace
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 12:38:15 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌



Dear Planning Commission Members,



I'm writing in support of Zoning Case Z-100-24-3, which will bring 24 much-needed
homes to the Paradise Valley Village. This rezoning allows for a moderately sized
apartment community that fits the area’s character and serves as a thoughtful
transition between nearby commercial and residential uses.

This is exactly the kind of well-designed, neighborhood-scale housing that Phoenix
needs. It offers homes within reach for more individuals and families, meeting
demand while enhancing the neighborhood.

We need more housing options like this to ensure that everyone in Phoenix has a
place to call home. I respectfully urge you to support this rezoning.

Sincerely,

Tom Kelly

30 E Saint Anne Ave, Phoenix 85042


Sent from my iPad




ATTACHMENT G

From: Ricardo
To: Matteo Moric
Cc: randy@reziopro.com
Subject: #Z-100-24-3
Date: Monday, July 14, 2025 8:28:42 AM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious   ‌


To Whom It May Concern:

Please accept this as an amendment to last line of previous email withdrawing
invitation for involved parties meeting at my residence regarding above noted case.

I will give my input within the framework already established at hearings or writing
should process continue on this case or address allowing for full transparency and
documentation.


Sincerely,

Ricardo Bocardo
13435 N 21st Pl.
Phoenix,Az,85022




From: Ricardo
To: Matteo Moric
Cc: randy@reziopro.com
Subject: Application #Z-100-24-3
Date: Friday, July 11, 2025 9:35:37 AM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious   ‌


Dear Mr. Matteo,

My name is Richard Bocardo, and I reside at 13435 N 21st Pl., Phoenix, Arizona. I
was recently at the Village Planning Committe Hearing held on July 7 at the Paradise
Community Center which you staffed. I was the sole neighborhood person to voice
my opinions after the proposal was presented by the representative for Rezio LLC.

I'm writing to share firstly how impressed I was by the professionalism and knowledge
exhibited by the committee as a whole evidenced by the questions they were asking
and secondly to inform that, as stated that night, I am not in opposition of "a" project
at that location should it meet R-3 zoning.

The questions being asked by the committee members quickly put me at ease in that
became soon apparent to me that known zoning codes were being used as a
standard by which to measure the request. I had minimal knowledge of same and am
under no illusions that my opposition to parts of proposal were a deciding factor.

My understanding is that Rezio LLC can ask for a continuance and/or present new
plans that would meet the concerns raised by the committee and the denial
recommendation has been forwarded to the Planning Commission.

I want to make myself available to both parties should input be helpful if new plans
will be in the works especially as it pertains to the north side of any construction
including number of car exits onto Eugie Terrace and balconies on second floor. I
would also add that Agave Townhomes on Sharon could be used as a model for
consideration as to impact on safety and privacy facing north on Sharon drive.

I welcome a visit to my property by any party which might further clarify some of my
concerns. Feel free to email, call or text.

Sincerely,
Richard ( Ricardo) Bocardo

602-330-1905


Subject: FW: Z-100-24-3
Attachments: IMG_20250820_082847.jpg; IMG_20250820_083028.jpg; IMG_20250820_081229.jpg;
IMG_20250820_083131.jpg; IMG_20250820_083214.jpg



&ƌŽŵ͗ZŝĐĂƌĚŽфƌĐďϵůŝŶĞΛĂŽů͘ĐŽŵх
^ĞŶƚ͗tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂLJ͕ƵŐƵƐƚϮϬ͕ϮϬϮϱϵ͗ϯϯD
dŽ͗ZĂĐĞůůĞƐĐŽůĂƌфƌĂĐĞůůĞ͘ĞƐĐŽůĂƌΛƉŚŽĞŶŝdž͘ŐŽǀх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ZĞ͗ͲϭϬϬͲϮϰͲϯ
Good mor ning , Please consider adding thes e pictures to my appeal fileZjQcm QRYFpfptBanner End




Good morning,
Please consider adding these pictures to my appeal file.

These apply to the claim by the applicant that a 4 story building would not affect ones privacy
with their tenants looking North or South out their windows or being on their balconies .

The first two pictures are only to show the development of my home and property.

As I mentioned at the Village Planning Committee hearing since my property is considered on the
foothills it slopes upward towards the East .

In the third photo one can see the top floor in white and black of a two story complex recently finished
on Sharon and 21st Place. A little difficult to see due to neighbors oleanders. I include these only to
show that our single family homes have already endured development and view disruption.

The last 2 photos are facing East towards the proposed complex. In those photos between the large
green tree and the top of the umbrella one can see a grey shingled roof which belongs to the one
story house on the site of proposed complex. It doesn't take much to see that a 3 to 4 stories would
tower above. The neighbors at 13451 have also voiced to me concern regarding the towering building
over them.

Thank you for considering only a 2 story complex at that site. Also want to reiterate that the only 3 or
4 story building in this area is far north of Sharon Drive .

Sincerely,
Richard Bocardo








Report