← Back to meetings

Meeting Community and Cultural Investment Subcommittee-4/6/2022 complete

2022-04-06 · Community and Cultural Investment Subcommittee

Items: 72

Community and Cultural Investment Subcommittee

View on Agenda Online ↗


Synced: 2026-05-28 03:37 AZ

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on June 3, 2020

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of June 3, 2020, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 11



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Special Formal Meeting on June
8, 2020

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Special Formal Meeting of June 8, 2020, for
review, correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 12



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REVISED ITEM (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Mayor and Council Appointments
to Boards and Commissions

Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.




Page 13
ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: April 6, 2022
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: REVISED* FOR ADD-ON BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee

I recommend the following for reappointment:

Alexander Benezra
Mr. Benezra is serving his fourth term to expire November 19, 2023.

Darin Fisher
Mr. Fisher is serving his first full term to expire November 19, 2023.

*Alhambra Village Planning Committee

Councilman Sal DiCiccio recommends the following for appointment:

Marc Bonilla
Mr. Bonilla is the President and Chief Executive Officer of VIAONE Commercial Real
Estate Group and a resident of District 6. He replaces Keith Ender for a term to expire
November 19, 2023.

Encanto Village Planning Committee

I recommend the following for reappointment:

Ann Cothron
Ms. Cothron is serving her third term to expire November 19, 2023.




Page 14
Jayson Matthews
Mr. Matthews is serving his third term to expire November 19, 2023.

Human Services Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Sheriolyn Curry
Reverend Curry is a Presiding Elder at the African Methodist Episcopal Church. She will
serve as a Category II, Area C representative for a term to expire June 30, 2024.

Industrial Development Authority

I recommend the following for appointment:

Phil Gordon
Mr. Gordon is a resident of District 4. He replaces Tony Cani and will fulfill the
remainder of his term to expire November 1, 2025.

North Gateway Village Planning Committee

I recommend the following for appointment:

Laura Franco French
Ms. Franco French is the Director of State Government Relations at Taiwan
Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and a resident of District 6. She fills a vacancy
for a partial term to expire November 19, 2022.

North Mountain Village Planning Committee

I recommend the following for reappointment:

Elizabeth Perez
Ms. Perez is serving her second term to expire November 19, 2023.

Rio Vista Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Ann O’Brien recommends the following for appointment:

Hunter Perreira
Mr. Perreira is the Regional Safety Manager at The Berg Group and a resident of
District 1. He fills a vacancy for a partial term to expire November 19, 2022.




Page 15
Sister Cities Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Christopher Curtin
Mr. Curtin is the Director of Regulatory Affairs at Republic National Distributing
Company of Arizona. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire April 6, 2025.

Amilyn Pierce
Ms. Pierce is the Vice President of Government Affairs at the Arizona Diamondbacks.
She fills a vacancy for a term to expire April 6, 2025.




Page 16



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Padre Murphy's

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 182572.

Summary

Applicant
David Gill, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4338 W. Bell Road, Ste. 1-4
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 24, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 17

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Tim Finnegans (Series 12)
17045 N. 59th Ave., #103, Glendale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have completed Title 4 Basic & Manager training for the last 13 years. I currently
hold a 12 license for another company I own.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are a full service restaurant first! We have been serving the surrounding
community for almost 30 years.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Padre Murphy's
Liquor License Map - Padre Murphy's

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 18
Liquor License Data: PADRE MURPHY'S
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 3 1

Liquor Store 9 4 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 3 1

Restaurant 12 11 3


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 51.45 0.31 0.53

Violent Crimes 9.65 0.45 0.63

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 55 44

Total Violations 96 80


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1042251 1242 53 % 8% 9%

1042253 904 85 % 5% 11 %

1042261 949 26 % 8% 11 %

6181001 1795 84 % 3% 7%

6181003 1271 93 % 6% 0%

6183001 1982 94 % 7% 9%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 19
Liquor License Map: PADRE MURPHY'S
4338 W BELL RD




Ü
Date: 2/24/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 20



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Wagering Permit - Padre Murphy's

Request for an Off-track Pari-Mutuel Wagering Permit for a business that has a Series
12 liquor license.

Summary
State law requires City Council approval before a State Off-track Pari-Mutuel Wagering
Permit can be issued. This request is for a permit for off-track betting on horse races
conducted at Turf Paradise.

Applicant
David Johnson, Agent for TP Racing L.L.L.P.

Location
4338 W. Bell Road, Ste. 1-4
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 1

Public Opinion
Public notice was posted at the proposed location and special notice letters were
mailed to residents within a 1/8 mile radius of the proposed location. The comment
period expired March 18, 2022. One letter protesting the issuance of this license has
been received and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The letter is from Arizona
Downs and states that Arizona Downs already has an existing lease and license for an
OTB at that location that does not expire until 2024.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application. Staff gave careful consideration to the
protest letter received however, after reviewing the application in its entirety staff is
recommending approval of this application.

Attachments
Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Wagering Permit Data - Padre Murphy's
Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Wagering Permit Map - Padre Murphy's



Page 21

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 22
Liquor License Data: PADRE MURPHY'S
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 3 1

Liquor Store 9 4 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 3 1

Restaurant 12 11 3


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 51.45 0.31 0.53

Violent Crimes 9.65 0.45 0.63

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 55 44

Total Violations 96 80


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1042251 1242 53 % 8% 9%

1042253 904 85 % 5% 11 %

1042261 949 26 % 8% 11 %

6181001 1795 84 % 3% 7%

6181003 1271 93 % 6% 0%

6183001 1982 94 % 7% 9%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 23
Liquor License Map: PADRE MURPHY'S
4338 W BELL RD




Ü
Date: 2/24/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 24



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - The Singletons

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Jody Boyd

Location
2832 E. Bell Road
Council District: 2

Function
Fundraiser

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 23, 2022 - 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 150 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 25



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Fly Bye

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 007070011537.

Summary

Applicant
Samuel Fox, Agent

License Type
Series 7 - Beer and Wine Bar

Location
21001 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste. 74-1557
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2

This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a beer and
wine bar. This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have
an interim permit. This business is currently being remodeled with plans to open in
May 2022.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 12, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.




Page 26

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am the founder of Fox Restaurant Concepts and have opened and operated more
than 20 restaurants in Arizona over the last 24 years. I act as agent on many of these
licenses and have taken the Arizona Department of Liquor recommended liquor
service training.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We believe the public will enjoy a beer or a glass of wine with their Detroit style pizza
and chicken tenders at Fly Bye, whether dining in or to-go."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Fly Bye
Liquor License Map - Fly Bye

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 27
Liquor License Data: FLY BYE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 10 7

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 2

Liquor Store 9 3 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 3

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 30 27


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 37.04 97.87

Violent Crimes 9.21 2.04 5.41

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 55 3

Total Violations 96 3




Page 28
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6150003 344 8% 38 % 5%

6151001 1444 84 % 18 % 8%

6152001 1993 8% 29 % 12 %

6152002 2127 70 % 10 % 4%

6152003 867 89 % 26 % 2%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 29
Liquor License Map: FLY BYE
21001 N TATUM BLVD




Ü
Date: 2/15/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 30



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Humble Bistro

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 07070363.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 7 - Beer and Wine Bar

Location
5415 E. High St., Ste. 127
Zoning Classification: C-2 DRSP
Council District: 2

This request is for an ownership and location transfer of liquor license for a beer and
wine bar. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales with a Series 12,
Restaurant, liquor license. This location requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining
and outdoor alcohol consumption.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 13, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.




Page 31

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Humble Bistro (Series 12)
5415 E. High St., Ste. 127, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 25
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Humble Bistro restaurant currently operates with a series 12 liquor license. Applicant
would like to add a series 7 beer and wine bar liquor license to allow customers the
opportunity to purchase beer and wines they enjoy at the restaurant for off-premises
consumption as well. The restaurant will continue to offer its complete menu of
homemade meals prepared with the freshest ingredients.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Humble Bistro
Liquor License Map - Humble Bistro


Page 32


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 33
Liquor License Data: HUMBLE BISTRO
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 9 7

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 2

Liquor Store 9 3 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 2

Restaurant 12 31 24



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 51.45 0.18 0.10

Violent Crimes 9.65 0.10 0

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 55 2

Total Violations 95 2



Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6152001 1993 8% 29 % 12 %

6152002 2127 70 % 10 % 4%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 34
Liquor License Map: HUMBLE BISTRO
5415 E HIGH ST




Ü
Date: 3/9/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 35



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - California Fish Grill

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 183525.

Summary

Applicant
Amy Nations, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1743 E. Camelback Road, Ste. A-5
Zoning Classification: PSC CEPCSP
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 10, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 36

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

California Fish Grill (Series 12)
1855 S. Stapley Drive, #101, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“California Fish Grill currently owns and operates 46 restaurants in 3 states. This new
location will be our 47th location and our 2nd restaurant in Arizona. They will operate
with responsible alcohol services and employees will be trained to ensure compliance
with all liquor laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“California Fish Grill will be a new restaurant in the area and provide the neighboring
community with a new option for dining out. We only sell seafood that is rated best
choice or good alternative by the Monterey Bay Aquarium seafood watch program or
Eco-Certified by a third party. All seafood offered on our menu is responsibly sourced.
We believe our restaurant will be a good fit for our new neighborhood.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - California Fish Grill
Liquor License Map - California Fish Grill




Page 37

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 38
Liquor License Data: CALIFORNIA FISH GRILL
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 2 2

Bar 6 4 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 5 3

Liquor Store 9 5 4

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 6

Hotel 11 2 1

Restaurant 12 43 20


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 146.04 282.69

Violent Crimes 9.21 16.58 23.03

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 55 36

Total Violations 96 72




Page 39
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1076022 1734 54 % 18 % 3%

1077002 738 57 % 10 % 8%

1077003 457 26 % 26 % 16 %

1077005 736 14 % 6% 4%

1085011 1023 33 % 6% 13 %

1085012 1416 74 % 21 % 4%

1085024 549 43 % 31 % 15 %

1086021 790 37 % 38 % 22 %

1086022 1187 11 % 25 % 52 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 40
Liquor License Map: CALIFORNIA FISH GRILL
1743 E CAMELBACK RD




Ü
Date: 2/14/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 41



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Torchy's Tacos

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 181352.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1935 E. Camelback Road, Ste. C-130
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
has plans to open in June 2022.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 18, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.




Page 42

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“With over 90 locations across the United States, Torchy's Tacos is opening it's first
location in Arizona. Torchy's Tacos is a casual family-friendly neighborhood restaurant
featuring a variety of tacos made with fresh ingredients. Applicant would like to offer
alcoholic beverages to guest 21 and over as an incident to the dishes served."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Torchy's Tacos
Liquor License Map - Torchy's Tacos

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 43
Liquor License Data: TORCHY'S TACOS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 2 2

Bar 6 4 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 3

Liquor Store 9 4 4

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 6

Hotel 11 2 1

Restaurant 12 40 20


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 51.45 1.56 3.60

Violent Crimes 9.65 0.95 2.01

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 55 30

Total Violations 95 52




Page 44
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1076022 1734 54 % 18 % 3%

1077002 738 57 % 10 % 8%

1077003 457 26 % 26 % 16 %

1077005 736 14 % 6% 4%

1085011 1023 33 % 6% 13 %

1085012 1416 74 % 21 % 4%

1085022 732 23 % 28 % 12 %

1085023 1475 42 % 20 % 7%

1085024 549 43 % 31 % 15 %

1086021 790 37 % 38 % 22 %

1086022 1187 11 % 25 % 52 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 45
Liquor License Map: TORCHY'S TACOS
1935 E CAMELBACK RD




Ü
Date: 2/18/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 46



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Angry Crab Shack Restaurant

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 012070011682.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
6360 S. 35th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 7

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 18, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the


Page 47

applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Angry Crab owns multiple locations throughout Arizona. We ensure our employees
are Title 4 liquor law trained."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 48



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Lom Wong/KHLA

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 184547.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
218 E. Portland St.
Zoning Classification: DTC-West Evans Churchill ACSBO
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 19, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 49

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Oliver's Sophisticated Bean/Jobot (Series 12)
333 E. Roosevelt St., #100, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 27
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We own and operate other establishments in the Phoenix area. We will continue to
abide by Title 4 liquor law and ensure our employees have attend the training courses
with ALIC.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location was previously licensed. We want to continue to serve the neighborhood
with a great place to enjoy their meal.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Lom Wong/KHLA
Liquor License Map - Lom Wong/KHLA

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 50
Liquor License Data: LOM WONG/KHLA
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 4 2

Government 5 9 4

Bar 6 42 13

Beer and Wine Bar 7 17 8

Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 4

Hotel 11 7 2

Restaurant 12 109 43

Club 14 2 0



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 51.45 1094.77 1580.25

Violent Crimes 9.65 241.71 377.49

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 55 107

Total Violations 96 174




Page 51
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1118002 1030 67 % 9% 17 %

1118004 671 62 % 6% 6%

1130001 1218 23 % 16 % 11 %

1130002 873 29 % 21 % 38 %

1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %

1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %

1132021 731 33 % 20 % 74 %

1132022 1257 47 % 29 % 55 %

1132031 1473 30 % 20 % 57 %

1132032 638 28 % 7% 70 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 52
Liquor License Map: LOM WONG/KHLA
218 E PORTLAND ST




Ü
Date: 2/23/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 53



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - HC Dining

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 181594.

Summary

Applicant
Alex Li, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
504 E. Roosevelt St., Ste. 1
Zoning Classification: DTC - East Evans Churchill
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 8, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 54

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Killer Whale Sex Club (Series 6)
922 N. 6th St., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 8
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Our group has the business acumen and financial means to manage and support our
proposed project on Roosevelt Row. Our group has a background in managing similar
projects and currently operate another business on Roosevelt Row. We intend to do
our best to adhere to the rules and regulations set in place by the City of Phoenix,
County of Maricopa and State of Arizona.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The license will be used to operate a restaurant and bar concept in a currently empty
building unit. We hope that opening more hospitality concepts in Roosevelt Row will
drive more people and revenue into the community. The space is currently sitting
empty, and we believe a restaurant and lounge will help liven up the community with
additional options for food and entertainment.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - HC Dining
Liquor License Map - HC Dining




Page 55

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 56
Liquor License Data: HC DINING
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 4 2

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 8 3

Bar 6 45 12

Beer and Wine Bar 7 15 6

Liquor Store 9 4 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 12 5

Hotel 11 8 4

Restaurant 12 105 40

Club 14 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 48.77 167.64 253.07

Violent Crimes 9.21 40.18 52.76

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 56 133

Total Violations 96 222




Page 57
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1117003 1057 64 % 2% 10 %

1118004 671 62 % 6% 6%

1130001 1218 23 % 16 % 11 %

1130002 873 29 % 21 % 38 %

1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %

1132021 731 33 % 20 % 74 %

1132022 1257 47 % 29 % 55 %

1132031 1473 30 % 20 % 57 %

1132032 638 28 % 7% 70 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 58
Liquor License Map: HC DINING
504 E ROOSEVELT ST




Ü
Date: 2/11/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 59



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - R & F Liquor

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070729.

Summary

Applicant
Steve Delly, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
4727 E. Southern Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 8

This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a liquor store. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 18, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application was filed has a valid license of the same
series issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and the best interest of the community at that location was established at
the time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once
the licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.




Page 60

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“This location has been owned and operated by our family for 24 years. We have
always followed Arizona liquor laws and have never had any problems. We have
proven ourselves to be good conscience business owners.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Being in business at this location for so long our neighbors and the local community
have become our regular patrons. Our neighbors know we operate a reputable
business with fair prices.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - R & F Liquor
Liquor License Map - R & F Liquor

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 61
Liquor License Data: R & F LIQUOR
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 1 1

Bar 6 1 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 1

Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 4

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 5 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 51.45 2.78 10.08

Violent Crimes 9.65 1.43 3.92

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 55 97

Total Violations 95 142




Page 62
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1162021 1187 94 % 0% 39 %

1162022 1836 62 % 0% 20 %

1162023 1215 57 % 6% 37 %

1162041 1426 79 % 6% 24 %

1162042 1819 57 % 0% 32 %

1162043 535 59 % 24 % 8%

1162052 1024 85 % 4% 26 %

3197031 1479 51 % 11 % 13 %

3197032 602 81 % 30 % 11 %

3197033 2085 30 % 14 % 34 %

3197041 1777 42 % 9% 20 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 63
Liquor License Map: R & F LIQUOR
4727 E SOUTHERN AVE




Ü
Date: 3/4/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 64



PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-48449) (Items 15-25)
Ordinance S-48449 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-13.

15 American Association of Airport Executives
For $250,000.00 in payment authority for 2022-23 American Association
of Airport Executives (AAAE) Enterprise membership dues for the
Aviation Department. AAAE membership will provide industry-specific
professional development training and certification programs for
employees to ensure Aviation Department staff are current on issues
affecting the industry. AAAE also advocates on behalf of airports to
prevent shifting of costs and federal responsibilities to airports, ensuring
that unfunded mandates are not imposed. AAAE provides important
information, alerts, updates and insight on legislation and proposed
regulations, security policy, and congressional hearing reports that
position the Aviation Department to proactively represent issues important
to the City of Phoenix and our region.

16 Daniel David Yockey doing business as D3 Concepts
LLC
For $10,973.00 in payment authority to purchase the TAC-HUB,
Electronic Target Shooting System, for the Police Department. The
system includes 10 Targets, one Gateway, one Android Tablet, 40 LED
leads, and 40 consumable LEDs. It is the most advanced and connected
live-fire training system available with LED feedback and an innovative
app. The system will be used by the Firearms Training Detail to provide


Page 65

specialized training, improve shooting skills, and produce real-time
decision-making with live fire. Currently, the Firearms Training Detail does
not have a target system capable of providing this level of training.

17 WS Acquisition, LLC doing business as Western
Shelter Systems
For $18,285.00 in payment authority to purchase a WSXE1200 Heating
Ventilation and Air Conditioning unit for the City of Phoenix Fire
Department. The unit utilizes a remote thermostat for automatic operation.
It is completely self-contained and portable. The system is critical to City
emergency response operations as it will be used to establish a
climate-controlled shelter if a catastrophic event occurred. The unit may
be used for additional purposes, such as during command post activities
for large-scale special events as well.

18 Principal Bank
For $130,000.00 in payment authority from Feb. 22, 2022, through Feb.
21, 2027, for custodian services for the Medical Expense
Reimbursement Plan Trust Fund and the Long-Term Disability Trust Fund
and Risk Management Self Insurance Trust Fund for the Finance
Department. The custody service will provide the setup and maintain
separate custody platforms for each trust fund, and will include
safeguarding investments, short-term investment of un-invested cash,
clearing of transactions and other services deemed necessary for the
proper and efficient handling of the assets of each trust fund. The
services will be paid from the applicable trust funds for each contract.

19 CyberSource Corporation
For $120,000.00 in additional payment authority for Contract 97062
through June 30, 2027, to continue to provide internet-based electronic
credit card payment processing support services for the Finance and
Information Technology Services departments. The CyberSource
eCommerce solution provides one of the primary technologies for
processing credit card payments for City services. Additional payment
authority is needed for the annual payment of services over the next five
years, which are critical to the continuation of an electronic payment
solution for residents and businesses.



Page 66


20 Arizona Blue Stake, Inc. doing business as Arizona 811
For $25,000.00 in additional payment authority for Contract 144146
through Nov. 30, 2023, for Arizona 811 Associate Membership for
Right-of-Way Excavation Notification Services for the Information
Technology Services (ITS) Department. The contract provides ITS with a
computer system to receive notifications of excavation activity within the
geographic area in which the City owns and operates underground
facilities. Per State law A.R.S. 40-360.21-32, participation in this program
is a legal requirement for all underground facility owners-operators with
the right to bury underground facilities in the right-of-way. Failure to
receive excavation notices may result in damages to the City-owned fiber
optic cables, which can lead to service outages to the City's internal and
external customers who currently use underground communication cables
for voice, data, and video service.

21 QCM Technologies, Inc.
For $413,730.00 in payment authority to purchase IBM software and
support for the Information Technology Services Department. The
licensing and support renewal is needed for the ongoing licensing and
maintenance of the technology infrastructure supporting SAP, for the
City's financial and procurement system.

22 Global Music Rights, LLC
For $10,000.00 in payment authority to purchase annual music licenses
for the Parks and Recreation Department. The license allows copyrighted
music to be performed publicly at various City parks and events in
compliance with the non-dramatic public performances of copyrighted
works. The license is for the 2022 calendar year.

23 Degan Construction, LLC
For $250,000.00 in additional payment authority for Agreement 154399,
for Change Order 1 of Project ST83140081 for the Palm Lane Storm
Drain: 28th Place to 32nd Street project for the Street Transportation
Department. The change order is for bid items that were not captured in
the original bid. It provides for additional services including traffic control
devices, construction survey and layout, and an allowance for extra work
and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Best Management Practices. The


Page 67

project uses Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget and State Aid.

24 Union Pacific Railroad Company
For $21,729.42 in payment authority to provide on-call design and
engineering services for the Street Transportation Department. The
services are needed for inspection and to ensure continuity of railroad
operations during the Seventh Street Bridge Bearing Pad Replacement
project. The payment will cover all costs associated with the project
on-call engineering services.

25 Allterra Central, Inc.
For $35,376.00 in payment authority to purchase surveying equipment for
the Street Transportation Department. The equipment is required to
complete the City's Continuously Operating Reference Station
monuments to be built in three proposed locations within the City of
Phoenix. The stations will allow staff to easily update the City's surveying
height benchmarks and the City's horizontal positioning.




Page 68



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Sell a Strip of City-owned Land Bifurcated from 2121 N. 83rd
Ave., South of an Irrigation Ditch (Ordinance S-48450)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to sell a strip of City-owned
land bifurcated from 2121 N. 83rd Ave., south of an irrigation ditch, via direct sale to
the adjacent property owner. Additionally request to authorize the City Treasurer to
accept all funds related to this item.

Summary
The strip of land to be sold is along the southern property boundary of the Ak Chin
Pavilion outdoor concert venue located at 2121 N. 83rd Ave. and is bifurcated from the
improved site by an irrigation ditch. The Parks and Recreation Department received
approval from the Parks and Recreation Board on Oct. 28, 2021, to sell directly to
Wiley Baker Farms Limited Partnership, an Arizona Limited Partnership, its
successors, and assigns ("Purchaser"). The strip of land contains approximately
25,197 square feet adjacent to the Wiley Baker Farm located at 8002 W. McDowell Rd.
and is within a gate owned by the Purchaser. The Purchaser is currently maintaining
the strip of land.

The City and Purchaser will enter into an agreement for the purchase and sale of City-
owned property, containing terms and conditions deemed necessary and appropriate
by the City. The land will be conveyed by special warranty deed, with the purchase
price based on a valuation of the land. The Purchaser will pay all closing costs,
including the cost of a survey. The land will be sold subject to all existing easements
and encumbrances.

Financial Impact
Revenue will be reflective of the market value of the property.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Parks and Recreation Department received approval from the Parks and
Recreation Board on Oct. 28, 2021.

Location
2121 N. 83rd Ave., within the southern boundary of Maricopa County Assessor parcel


Page 69

number 102-37-009.
Council District 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation and Finance departments.




Page 70



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Acquire Easements from Roosevelt Irrigation District at 99th
Avenue and McDowell Road (Ordinance S-48461)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire easements from
the Roosevelt Irrigation District (RID) at 99th Avenue and McDowell Road. Further
request authorization for the City Controller to disburse, and for the City Treasurer to
accept, all funds related to this item.

Additionally request the City Council grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code
§42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code §42-18 as RID's form documents include such
provisions.

Summary
Acquisition of easements over the RID canal is required for access from 99th Avenue
and from McDowell Road to private property located at the northeast corner of the
canal. All costs related to this acquisition will be borne by the developer with no costs
to the City.

The property impacted by this acquisition is RID canal right-of-way located
approximately 144 feet east of 99th Avenue and along the north side of McDowell
Road.

Location
Northeast corner of 99th Avenue and McDowell Road.
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer and the Community and Economic Development and Finance
Departments.




Page 71



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of Easement for Drainage Purposes (Ordinance S-48468)

Request for the City Council to accept easement for drainage purposes; further
ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interest below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: Allero 59, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 5821 W. McDowell Road.
File: FN 210130
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.




Page 72



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance and Dedication of Easements and a Deed for Public Utility, Roadway
and Sidewalk Purposes (Ordinance S-48475)

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements and a deed for public
utility, roadway, and sidewalk purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: Allero 59, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 5821 W. McDowell Road.
File: FN 210130
Council District: 4

Easement (b)
Applicant: A5 Residential LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 2746 W. Pima St.
File: FN 220007
Council District: 7

Deed (c)
Applicant: A5 Residential LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 2746 W. Pima St.
File: FN 220007
Council District: 7

Easement (d)
Applicant: Chamberlain Development, L.L.C., its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk


Page 73

Location: 3939 W. Buckeye Road.
File: FN 220011
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development and Finance departments.




Page 74



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendments to Classification Plan S-5815 in Accordance with Human
Resources Committee 613 Recommendations (Ordinance S-48488)

As part of a classification and compensation study, the following amendments to the
Classification Plan [S-5815] are proposed in accordance with the recommendation of
Human Resources Committee 613, effective April 18, 2022. The proposal will also
require modifications to the City’s Pay Ordinance [S-47689] which will be processed
under a separate ordinance.

Establish the classification of General Apprentice - U2 (NC), Job Code 00020, Salary
Plan 200, Grade 290 ($15.00 - $35.00/hourly), Benefit Category 002, Labor Unit Code:
002, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.

Establish the classification of General Apprentice - U3 (NC), Job Code 00030, Salary
Plan 300, Grade 390 ($15.00 - $35.00/hourly), Benefit Category 003, Labor Unit Code:
003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.

Establish the classification of General Apprentice - U7 (NC), Job Code 00070, Salary
Plan 700, Grade 090 ($15.00 - $35.00/hourly), Benefit Category 007, Labor Unit Code:
007, EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.

Summary
BACKGROUND
On Nov. 17, 2021, at the recommendation of Human Resources Committee 611, City
Council approved a new model for apprenticeships, using a generic classification and
an open range without steps. Specifically, General Apprentice-U1 was established at
that time. This model allows for the classification and salary range to be used by a
variety of disciplines within the unit, and the specific rates of pay for the apprentices,
as they progress through the program, to be developed in partnership between
Classification/Compensation and the Apprenticeship Committee. To date, Solid Waste
Equipment Operator Apprentice and Street Maintenance Apprentice have been
established within General Apprentice-U1.

The success of this model has prompted adding General Apprentice classifications for
Units 2, 3, and 7, so that apprenticeships can be established within these units should
the need arise.

Page 75




CONCLUSIONS
Creating General Apprentice-U2, U3, and U7 will improve recruiting efforts and help
create a pipeline of skilled workers that have learned a job specifically as it is done at
the City of Phoenix. It will also serve the community by creating the opportunity to
generate income while learning new skills. And finally, it will allow participants to earn
progressively increasing wages as skills are learned, and provide well-paying, well-
benefitted jobs with the City, upon successful completion of the apprenticeship.

Financial Impact
There are no budgetary impacts associated with these actions.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This action was reviewed and recommended for approval by Human Resources
Committee 613 on March 3, 2022.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.




Page 76



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendments to Pay Ordinance S-47689 in Accordance with Human Resources
Committee 613 Recommendations (Ordinance S-48489)

As part of a classification and compensation study, the following amendments to the
Pay Ordinance [S 47689] are proposed in accordance with the recommendation of
Human Resources Committee 613, effective April 18, 2022. The proposal will also
require modifications to the City’s Classification Plan [S-5815], which will be processed
under a separate ordinance.

Establish the classification of General Apprentice - U2 (NC), Job Code 00020, Salary
Plan 200, Grade 290 ($15.00 - $35.00/hourly), Benefit Category 002, Labor Unit Code:
002, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.

Establish the classification of General Apprentice - U3 (NC), Job Code 00030, Salary
Plan 300, Grade 390 ($15.00 - $35.00/hourly), Benefit Category 003, Labor Unit Code:
003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.

Establish the classification of General Apprentice - U7 (NC), Job Code 00070, Salary
Plan 700, Grade 090 ($15.00 - $35.00/hourly), Benefit Category 007, Labor Unit Code:
007, EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.

Summary
BACKGROUND
On Nov. 17, 2021, at the recommendation of Human Resources Committee 611, City
Council approved a new model for apprenticeships, using a generic classification and
an open range without steps. Specifically, General Apprentice-U1 was established at
that time. This model allows for the classification and salary range to be used by a
variety of disciplines within the unit, and the specific rates of pay for the apprentices,
as they progress through the program, to be developed in partnership between
Classification/Compensation and the Apprenticeship Committee. To date, Solid Waste
Equipment Operator Apprentice and Street Maintenance Apprentice have been
established within General Apprentice-U1.

The success of this model has prompted adding General Apprentice classifications for
Units 2, 3, and 7, so that apprenticeships can be established within these units should
the need arise.

Page 77




CONCLUSIONS
Creating General Apprentice-U2, U3, and U7 will improve recruiting efforts and help
create a pipeline of skilled workers that have learned a job specifically as it is done at
the City of Phoenix. It will also serve the community by creating the opportunity to
generate income while learning new skills. And finally, it will allow participants to earn
progressively increasing wages as skills are learned, and provide well-paying, well-
benefitted jobs with the City, upon successful completion of the apprenticeship.

Financial Impact
There are no budgetary impacts associated with these actions.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This action was reviewed and recommended for approval by Human Resources
Committee 613 on March 3, 2022.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.




Page 78



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Worker's Compensation Third Party Administration Claims Management
Services, RFP HR 21-027 (Ordinance S-48491)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. (CCMSI) to provide third party
administration of claims management services for the City's Worker's Compensation
Program in an amount not to exceed $15,000,000 for a five-year period. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The City's Worker's Compensation Program has been self-insured since April 2003.
The services of a qualified Third Party Administrator (TPA) is required to provide
administration of claims management services. The TPA is responsible for the
investigation and evaluation of claims to ensure the proper disposition and medical
management of each claim, and to follow established City's claim procedures and
adhere to claims administration requirements as required by federal, state, and/or local
laws. The existing contract for Worker's compensation Third Party Administration
Claims Management Services is set to expire Jun. 30, 2022.

Procurement Information
RFP HR 21-027 was conducted in accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10.
The Human Resources Department received four proposals. The Notice of Solicitation
was emailed to 325 vendors registered in ProcurePHX.

The offers were scored using the following criteria: Qualifications, Experience and
References (250 points), Method of Approach (450 points) and pricing (300 points).
Evaluation occurred by a five-person panel. The evaluation panel determined that one
offer was within the competitive range. A Best and Final Offer was conducted, which
resulted in a price reduction of approximately $1.6 million. After reviewing the BAFO
response, it was the consensus of the evaluation committee to recommend awarding
the contract to Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.

The consensus scores are as follows:
Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc. 928 points
CorVel Enterprise, Comp., Inc. 706 points


Page 79

Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. 650 points
TRISTAR Claims Management Services, Inc. 610 points

The Acting Human Resources Director recommends the offer from Cannon Cochran
Management Services, Inc., be accepted as the highest scored, responsive and
responsible offer most advantageous to the City.

Contract Term
The five-year contract term shall begin on or about Jul. 1, 2022.

Financial Impact
The five-year aggregate contract value will not exceed $15,000,000. Funds are
available in the Worker's Compensation Program Trust Account.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.




Page 80



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendment to Pay Ordinance S-47689 to Extend the Deadlines for Premium Pay
Under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to Eligible City Employees
(Ordinance S-48492)

Request City Council approval of amendments to Pay Ordinance S-47689 to extend
the deadline from Jan. 18, 2022 to June 30, 2022 for authorized payment under the
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) of five hundred dollars ($500) in premium
pay to eligible full-time employees and two hundred fifty dollars ($250) in premium pay
to eligible non-seasonal part-time employees in Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and
authorize additional premium pay under ARPA of one thousand five hundred dollars
($1,500) to eligible full-time employees and seven hundred fifty ($750) to eligible non-
seasonal part-time employees in Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, who are fully
vaccinated for COVID-19 by June 30, 2022 (Attachment A).

Summary
The proposed amendment to Section 11 [Assignment Pay, Differential, Standby and
Other Additional Compensation], paragraph (z) of the current Pay Ordinance (S-
47689) would permit the City Manager to extend the deadline from Jan. 18, 2022 to
June 30, 2022 to allow for the processing of authorized premium pay, in accordance
with ARPA requirements, to eligible full-time employees, non-seasonal part-time
employees, and non-seasonal part-time employees who are fully vaccinated by COVID
-19. This would allow eligible employees who have not already received ARPA
Premium Pay to have an opportunity to do so provided they meet the criteria by June
30, 2022.

Financial Impact
The cost of all actions taken related to this ordinance would be paid for from ARPA
funds allocated to the City.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Amendment to Pay Ordinance S-47689 to Authorize Premium Pay Under the American
Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to Eligible City Employees (Ordinance S- 48170) was
approved by Council on Dec. 15, 2021.




Page 81

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.




Page 82
Attachment A

PURPOSE – The proposed amendments to Section 11 of the Pay Ordinance (S-47689) is designed to extend
the vaccination deadline from January 18, 2022, to June 30, 2022, for the authorized the payment of “premium
pay” under ARPA to eligible City employees in Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.

New language to be included in the Pay Ordinance is identified in all capital letters. Deletions are indicated
by strikethrough. Proposed language is as follows:



SECTION 11. Assignment Pay, Differential, Standby and Other Additional Compensation



(z) The City Manager is authorized to provide premium pay as set forth in the
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) in the amount of five hundred dollars
($500) to eligible full-time employees in Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 who are not
teleworking more than two days per week as of January 18, 2022 and two
hundred fifty dollars ($250) to eligible non-seasonal part-time employees in Units
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 who are not teleworking more than two days per week as
of January 18, 2022. THE CITY MANAGER IS AUTHORIZED TO EXTEND THE DATE
TO JUNE 30, 2022. All payments must conform with the ARPA, as amended.

The City Manager is authorized to provide premium pay as set forth in the ARPA
in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1500) to eligible full-time
employees in Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 who are not teleworking more than
two days per week, and are fully vaccinated for COVID-19 by January 18, 2022,
and seven hundred fifty dollars ($750) to eligible non-seasonal part-time
employees in Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 who are not teleworking more than
two days per week, and are fully vaccinated for COVID-19 by January 18, 2022.
THE CITY MANAGER IS AUTHORIZED TO EXTEND THE VACCINATION DEADLINE TO
JUNE 30, 2022. All payments must conform with the ARPA, as amended.




Page 83



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Emergency Call System Monitoring and Maintenance Contract (Ordinance S-
48487)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Climatec, LLC to provide Emergency Call System Monitoring and Maintenance
Service including providing all labor, material, reports, equipment, tools, replacement
parts and administrative services necessary to perform all maintenance, inspections
and repairs needed to keep the system operational for three Housing Department
senior sites. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item over the life of the contract in an amount not to exceed $96,000.

Summary
The Housing Department is required to provide and maintain a medical emergency call
system for Senior Sites by the Arizona Department of Housing. Housing uses an
existing pull cord system that meets the Department of Housing and Urban
Development requirements for emergency call systems.

In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, a Special Circumstances Without
Competition Determination has been fully approved.

Procurement Information
The Housing Department attempted to extend the current contract beyond the five
years with a determination however, the current contractor would not extend due to
them leaving the monitoring business.

Invitation for Bid (IFB) FY22-086-04 Emergency Call Systems Monitoring and
Maintenance was conducted in accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10. The
solicitation notification was distributed to 246 contractors registered with the City of
Phoenix. No offers were received by the closing date of Jan. 6, 2022.

The Housing Department reached out to companies that had the potential to provide
services and Climatec was the only company contacted that agreed to the City’s
contract terms and conditions.




Page 84

Contract Term
The contract term shall begin on April 12, 2022, and end on April 11, 2027.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $96,000 over the life of the contract.
There is no impact to the General Fund as these services are paid through federal
funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Locations
Council District 3 - Sunnyslope Manor, 205 E. Ruth Ave.
Council District 5 - Maryvale Parkway Terrace, 4545 N. Maryvale Parkway Council
District 8 - Fillmore Gardens, 802 N. 22nd Place

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.





Page 85



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Custodial Services (Parks and Recreation Department) - Requirements Contract
(IFB 19-088) (Ordinance S-48457)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 150078 with Bio Janitorial Service, Inc. and Contract
150077 with Commercial Custodial Services for the provision of custodial services for
the Parks and Recreation Department. Further request authorization for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not
exceed $190,000.

Summary
These contracts provide custodial services for general cleaning of interior and exterior
areas of Parks and Recreation facilities. Services include all the necessary trained
personnel, supervision, scheduling, equipment and tools, with maintenance, and other
accessories required to perform complete custodial services. The funds are needed to
add the new Cesar Chavez Community Center, which is expected to open in summer
2022.

Contract Term
The Contract term is July 7, 2019 through June 30, 2024.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $190,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of these
contracts will not exceed $4,420,000. Funds are available in the Parks and Recreation
Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
These contracts were originally approved by City Council on May 1, 2019.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.




Page 86



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aquatic Rescue, Training, and Sports Equipment and Supplies - Requirements
Contract IFB 22-077 (Ordinance S-48478)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
The Lifeguard Store and Water Safety Products, Inc. to purchase Aquatic Rescue,
Training, and Sports Equipment and Supplies for Parks and Recreation Department.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The aggregate contract value will not exceed $400,000.

Summary
These contracts are for the purchase of aquatic equipment and supplies for the Parks
and Recreation Department's Aquatics Division. They will supply the City pools with
equipment and supplies necessary to certify lifeguards and operate the City's swim
lesson program. Historically, the City hires over 650 certified lifeguards to operate 29
swimming pools annually and approximately 18,000 residents participate in swim
lessons and recreational teams.

Procurement Information
IFB 22-077 was conducted in accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10. There
were two offers received by the Procurement Division on Feb. 25, 2022, which were
evaluated on price, responsiveness to specifications and responsibility to provide the
required goods and services. The bid notification was sent to over 130 suppliers and
was publicly posted and available for download from the City's website.

The Assistant Finance Director recommends that the offers from The Lifeguard Store
and Water Safety Products, Inc. be accepted as the lowest priced, responsive and
responsible offers. Multiple awards are recommended to ensure the overall lowest cost
to the City.

Contract Term
The one-year contract term, which includes four, one-year options to extend, will begin
on or about April 11, 2022.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $400,000. Funds are available in the


Page 87

Parks and Recreation Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.




Page 88



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorize Deposit Agreement with Jefferson Place Partners, LLC and a
Concurrent Non-Project Activity of the South Central Extension Downtown Hub
Light Rail Project located at 101 S. Central Ave. (Ordinance S-48490)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a deposit
agreement, and other agreements as necessary (Agreements), with Jefferson Place
Partners, LLC, or its City-approved designee (Developer), to fund a Concurrent Non-
Project Activity (CNPA) of the South Central Extension Downtown Hub (SCE-DH) Light
Rail Project (Project) adjacent to the Developer’s property at 101 S. Central Ave.
(Site). This authorization shall further authorize staff to enter into a CNPA Agreement
with Valley Metro Rail, Inc. (Valley Metro) who is constructing the Project. Further
requests authorization for the City Treasurer to accept funds and the City Controller to
disburse funds related to this item. The project will have no impact to the General
Fund.

Summary
Developer intends to construct a mixed-use high-rise project at the Site and wishes for
the SCE-DH Project plans to reflect changes in the public right-of-way on Central
Avenue compatible with the Developer’s future project. Developer has submitted plans
for off-site improvements to the City and pending review and approval from the
Planning and Development Department (PDD), staff would transmit those plans to
Valley Metro who would review the feasibility of revising the Project plans.

Based on a preliminary review of the Developer’s off-site plans, Valley Metro has
indicated it can construct a new curbline, drainage, sidewalk, paving and valley gutter
to the Developer’s specifications. In addition, the Project can also relocate a proposed
gutter to the new proposed curbline on Central Avenue. Since these improvements are
not part of the current Project plans, the City must authorize this work as a CNPA.
Furthermore, since the improvements are at the request of the Developer, they must
be paid for by the Developer.

Without agreeing to the Developer’s proposed alterations, the current Project
improvements in the public right-of-way (ROW) adjacent to the Site are at risk of being
removed and replaced when the Developer moves forward with its proposed project.
Therefore, in order to safeguard the City’s investment in the new ROW improvements,


Page 89

staff recommends authorizing the CNPA and a Deposit Agreement (DA) with the
Developer to fund 100 percent of the new ROW improvements. In order to facilitate
this work, the following business terms have been negotiated between the Community
and Economic Development Department and the Developer:
1. Developer and City shall enter into a DA within one month of Council approval.
2. Upon signing the DA, the Developer shall pay to the City $131,250. This is the
estimated increase in construction costs to build the new ROW improvements.
3. The City will transmit funds to Valley Metro per the costs outlined in the CNPA. Any
unused funds shall be reimbursed to the Developer.

Valley Metro via the CNPA will deliver the new improvements on construction timelines
compatible with the Project, ensuring a completed ROW condition surrounding the Site
is available to the public once the SCE-DH Light Rail Project is completed.

Financial Impact
Developer shall pay all costs associated with the work. There is no impact to the
General Fund as a result of this item.

Location
101 S. Central Ave.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Ginger Spencer
and the Public Transit and Community and Economic Development Departments.




Page 90



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Adoption of Resolution Approving the Issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue
Notes (Harmony at the Park Two Project) for Purposes of Arizona Revised
Statutes, Section 35-721(B) (Resolution 22012)

Requests City Council adoption of Resolution 22012 approving the issuance of
Multifamily Housing Revenue Notes (Harmony at the Park Two Project), Series 2022,
to be issued in one or more tax-exempt and/or taxable series in an aggregate principal
amount not to exceed $25,000,000, solely for the purposes of complying with the
Arizona Revised Statutes, section 35-721(B).

Summary
On November 3, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 21976 granting approval
of the proceedings under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of
Phoenix, AZ. (the "Phoenix IDA") had resolved to issue up to $20,000,000 of
Multifamily Housing Revenue Notes (the "Revenue Notes") as required by A.R.S. 35-
721(B). The proceeds from the sale of the Revenue Notes are to used by Harmony at
the Park Two, LLC (the "Borrower"), an Arizona limited liability company, to

a) finance or refinance, as applicable, all or a portion of the acquisition, construction,
improvement, equipping, or operation of a multifamily residential rental housing facility
in Phoenix, Arizona, and
b) pay certain costs related to the issuance of the Revenue Notes.

Resolution 21976 approved the proceedings of the Phoenix IDA under which the
Revenue Notes were to be issued. On March 17, 2022, the Phoenix IDA adopted a
resolution amending such proceedings to reflect, among other things, an increase to
the not to exceed aggregate principal amount of the Notes, from an aggregate
principal amount of not to exceed $20,000,000 to an aggregate principal amount of not
to exceed $25,000,000.

Because Resolution 21976 did not reflect the Phoenix IDA's subsequent proceedings,
a new approval of the plan of financing and issuance of the Revenue Notes is
requested by adoption of Resolution 22012.




Page 91

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Revenue Notes at its
meeting held on October 14, 2021 and March 17, 2022.

The Phoenix City Council approved Resolution 21976 at its November 3, 2021 Formal
Meeting.

Location
The Project is located at or near 600 N. 20th St. in Phoenix, AZ.
Council District: 8

With the exception of certain housing bonds, the Phoenix IDA can finance projects
located anywhere in Arizona. In addition, the Phoenix IDA may issue bonds to finance
projects outside of Arizona, if the out-of-state project provides a benefit within the
State.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.




Page 92



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Resolution to Participate In and Support Bid to Host 2029-2031 NCAA
Women's Basketball Final Four Tournament (Resolution 22011)

Request to authorize a resolution to express support for the region's bid to host the
NCAA Division I Women's Basketball Final Four Tournament in one of the years
from 2029 to 2031, and to authorize the City's participation in the bid if Phoenix
advances in the bid process as a finalist.

Summary
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has requested a declaration of
support from the City of Phoenix in the bid to host the NCAA Women's Basketball
Final Four Tournament between 2029 and 2031. This resolution will express the
City's support for the bid through the commitment of general government services
(including: citywide operations liaison; ambush marketing protections; permitting
assistance; public safety support/emergency preparedness; aviation
arrival/departure cooperation; and provision of Fan Festival, Super Saturday
Concert, Salute Presentation, Youth Bounce and Women's Basketball Coaches
Convention venues).

The national semifinals and championship games would require use of the City-
owned Footprint Center in downtown Phoenix as the competition venue. City staff
and the Phoenix Bid Committee are currently working with the Phoenix Suns to
reserve the Center for the requested dates. In addition, major fan-related events,
lodging, and meeting activities associated with the tournament would also be held
in downtown Phoenix. The tournament is held annually, and this bid is to host the
tournament in Phoenix in one of the years spanning 2029 to 2031. If awarded, this
would be the second-time that Phoenix would host the Women's Basketball Final
Four.

In conjunction with the Phoenix Local Organizing Committee, Arizona State
University (Host Institution), and the Greater Phoenix Convention and Visitors
Bureau (Visit Phoenix), Phoenix was awarded to host the 2024 NCAA Men's
Basketball Final Four for the second-time, and was awarded to host the 2026 NCAA
Women's Basketball Final Four for the first-time.


Page 93


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.




Page 94



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Police Department Hiring Software (E-SOPH) - Requirements Contract
EXC 22-057 (Ordinance S-48465)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Miller Mendel, Inc. to purchase hiring software known as E-SOPH for the Police
Department. Further request an exception to the indemnity and assumption of liability
provisions of Phoenix City Code section 42-18 and authorization for the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The aggregate contract value will not exceed
$611,770.

Summary
This software will streamline background investigations on prospective applicants and
electronic reference checks and will increase efficiencies when data is shared with the
11 Arizona law enforcement agencies that already use E-SOPH. This will allow the City
to request and send applicant files to other law enforcement agencies to conduct file
reviews. As the Police Department is currently experiencing significant staffing
shortages, this new software technology will automate the business processes,
streamline case management and reduce applicant processing times.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived as
a result of an approved Determination Memo which cited the software is a patented
system and Miller Mendel is the only vendor who can provide the software.

Contract Term
The five-year contract term will begin on or about April 1, 2022.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $611,770. Funds are available in the
Police Department's budget.




Page 95

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.




Page 96



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Wildlife Management Services - Requirements Contracts - IFB 22-006 (Ordinance
S-48452)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Loomacres, Inc. to provide wildlife management services for the Aviation Department
for an aggregate five-year contract term. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The aggregate contract value will
not exceed $863,000.

Summary
As a Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 139 certified airport, Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport (PHX) is required by the Federal Aviation Administration to
establish a continually updated wildlife hazard management plan. To meet this
requirement, the Aviation Department contracts a full time, on-site biologist stationed at
PHX to administer the approved wildlife hazard management plan and to conduct a
comprehensive wildlife hazard assessment at PHX. The qualified biologist will work
with Aviation Department officials to prevent and mitigate safety hazards related to wild
and feral vertebrate animals at PHX, as well as the Phoenix Deer Valley Airport and
Phoenix Goodyear Airport.

Procurement Information
AVN IFB 22-006 was conducted in accordance with Administrative Regulations 3.10.
The solicitation notification was sent to 378 supplier contacts and publicly posted and
available for download from the City's website. Only one offer, shown below, was
received on Dec. 1, 2021, and was evaluated on price, responsiveness, and
responsibility to provide the required services:

Loomacres, Inc., $55.38 Hourly Rate, $94,545 Wildlife Hazard Assessment

The Aviation Department recommends the offer from Loomacres, Inc. be accepted as
responsive, responsible, and of fair market value.

Contract Term
The five-year aggregate contract term shall begin on or about July 1, 2022 with no
options to extend.


Page 97


Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $863,000 for the five-year aggregate
contract term.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's operating budget.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.;
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Rd.; and
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Rd. Goodyear, Ariz.
Council Districts: 1, 8 and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 98



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Apply for, Accept, and Disburse Federal Grant Funds for
Aviation-Related Projects (Ordinance S-48454)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to submit applications for
grants to the United States and any of its agencies for aviation-related projects.
Further request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to sign all certifications
required for the grants, enter into agreements with the United States and any of its
agencies for the purpose of accepting federal money, and to amend existing grant
agreements. These grant agreements may contain other terms and conditions deemed
necessary or appropriate by the City Manager or his designee. Additionally request to
authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds
related to this item.

Summary
The Aviation Department submits grant applications to the United States and its
agencies for eligible aviation-related projects. The Aviation Department takes a
proactive position in obtaining City Council authorization to accept any grants awarded
by the United States and its agencies for eligible aviation-related projects.

These authorizations will allow the Aviation Department to respond promptly to federal
agencies if and when grant offers become available on short notice. This approval will
be especially important for staff to respond quickly to opportunities for discretionary
grants under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The grant agreements or grant
amendments or both may become available from the Department of Transportation,
including the FAA Airport Improvement Program, Department of Homeland Security, or
any other federal program.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 99



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Apply for, Accept and Disburse Federal Non-Grant Funds for
Aviation-Related Projects (Ordinance S-48455)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to submit applications for non-
grant funds to the United States and any of its agencies for aviation-related projects.
Further request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to sign all certifications
required for the non-grant agreements, enter into agreements with the United States
and any of its agencies for the purpose of accepting federal non-grants, and to amend
existing agreements. These agreements and amendments may contain other terms
and conditions deemed necessary or appropriate by the City Manager or his designee.
Additionally request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to
disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
These authorizations will allow the Aviation Department to respond promptly to federal
agencies if and when non-grant funds become available on short notice. The
transaction agreements or amendments may become available from the Department
of Homeland Security or any other federal program. The Aviation Department takes a
proactive position in obtaining City Council authorization to accept any non-grant funds
awarded by the United States for eligible aviation-related projects.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 100



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Apply for, Accept, and Disburse State Grant Funds for Aviation-
Related Projects (Ordinance S-48456)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to submit applications for
grants to the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) on behalf of the City of
Phoenix Airport System for aviation-related projects. Further request to authorize the
City Manager, or his designee, to sign all certifications required for the grants, enter
into grant agreements with ADOT for the purpose of accepting money, and to amend
existing grant agreements. These grant agreements and amendments may contain
other terms and conditions deemed necessary or appropriate by the City Manager or
his designee. Additionally request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the
City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
The Aviation Department submits grant applications to ADOT for eligible projects,
including those related to maintenance, safety, capacity enhancement, environmental
studies or planning, and land acquisition. The Aviation Department takes a proactive
position in obtaining City Council authorization to accept any grants awarded by ADOT
for eligible aviation-related projects.

Under the grant agreements, the State requires the City to indemnify and hold
harmless the State and any of its departments, agencies, officers, and employees from
any and all liability, loss, or damage the State may suffer as a result of claims,
demands, costs, or judgments of any character arising out of the City's or its
independent contractor's performance or non-performance in carrying out any
provision of the grant agreements. If any legal action is brought, the indemnification
also includes court costs, expenses of litigation, and reasonable attorney's fees.
Further, the State will not assume any liability to third persons and will not reimburse
the City for the City's liability to third persons resulting from the performance of the
grant agreements or any subcontract there under.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.



Page 101



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Rental Car Center LED Light Retrofit - Engineering Services - AV15000073
(Ordinance S-48463)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with CR Engineers, Inc., to provide Engineering Services that include design and
construction administration and inspection services for the Rental Car Center LED
Light Retrofit project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The fee for services will not exceed $256,000.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to replace the existing light fixtures at the Rental Car
Center with LED fixtures which will significantly reduce operating and maintenance
costs over a 20-year period and will further the City's sustainability goals by reducing
carbon footprint.

CR Engineers, Inc. was previously issued Notice to Proceed to provide design
services and construction administration and inspection services under the 2019-20
Engineering On-Call Services contracts. The contract has since expired and CR
Engineers, Inc. was not selected under the 2021-22 Engineering On-Call Services
contract. CR Engineers, Inc. had completed the design and was assisting through the
bid phase and construction administration and inspection. Prior to start of construction,


Page 102

the project was placed on hold due to COVID-19 impact on the rental car companies'
operation. Because CR Engineers, Inc. completed significant work on the project, the
need to have the original designer reconstruct the original construction documents and
provide construction administration and inspection is essential.

CR Engineers, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to: repackage original plans
and specifications to include complete scope of work and address recently installed
changes carried out as part of other projects and Aviation Facilities and Services
maintenance work; provide cost estimate backcheck, re-bid assistance and post-bid
phase services; construction administration services, and project closeout; and other
tasks as required for a complete project.

Procurement Information
CR Engineers, Inc. was chosen for this project using a Direct Select process set forth
in section 34-103 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. The Direct Select process will
reduce the time to procure additional design and construction administration and
inspection services, as opposed to an advertised selection process; therefore, meeting
the project deadline and ensuring continuity and the most efficient use of staff and
funding resources.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for CR Engineers, Inc. will not exceed $256,000, including all
subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
1805 E. Sky Harbor Circle South
Council District: 8




Page 103

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Aviation
Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 104



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
United States Customs and Border Protection Facility Agreement - Amendment
to Ordinance (Ordinance S-48464)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Ordinance S-44758
to increase the square footage from approximately 30,000 square feet to
approximately 93,565 square feet and add Terminal 3 space in the final negotiated
facility agreement with United States Customs and Border Protection.

Summary
United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) conducts passenger processing
for inbound international passengers and regulates international trade through the
cargo facilities at Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX). In 2018, the City Council
approved Ordinance S-44758 allowing the City to enter into an agreement with CBP
covering approximately 30,000 square feet at PHX. Further evaluation of the space
calculations concluded that the actual square footage reflected in Ordinance S-44758
should be approximately 93,565. The space adjustments reflect enhancements made
as a result of the Terminal 4 FIS Modernization Program, the development of CBP
office space in Terminal 3 to support airlines with pre-cleared flights from Canada, and
miscellaneous adjustments to the South Cargo clearance office space. The Aviation
Department is currently negotiating the agreement with CBP and it has not been
finalized. As a result, staff recommends the Ordinance be amended to add the
additional square footage of 63,565 prior to executing the final agreement.

Contract Term
In order to accommodate annual federal appropriations, the term will be one year with
nine one-year options to extend at the mutual discretion of the Director of the Aviation
Department and CBP.

Financial Impact
No financial impact.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Ordinance S-44758 on June 20, 2018.




Page 105

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 106



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Window Cleaning and High Dusting Services - Amendment (Ordinance S-48467)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 147357 with Prestige Window Cleaning Inc. dba Professional Window
Cleaning, to provide additional funding for window cleaning and high dusting services
for the Aviation Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures included in this
amendment will not exceed $350,000.

Summary
On April 18, 2018, the City Council approved this contract to provide interior and
exterior window cleaning and high dusting services. This contract provides specialized
services and equipment to clean windows at extreme heights, over roadways, and
airside, and to maneuver equipment between parked aircraft in safety and security
areas to perform services for the Aviation and Phoenix Convention Center
departments.

The purpose of this amendment is to provide the Aviation Department additional
cleaning and dusting services required for the modernized Terminal 3 Concourse and
Processor, the new Terminal 4 South Concourse, and the new 24th Street and Rental
Car Center Sky Train Stations. These modernized and new locations were not
completed at the time of the original Council approval.

Contract Term
The contract term will remain unchanged, with options to extend through May 31,
2023.

Financial Impact
The initial authorization for window cleaning and high dusting services was for an
expenditure not-to-exceed $1,848,750. This amendment will increase the authorization
for the contract by an additional $350,000, for a new total not-to-exceed contract value
of $2,198,750.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's budget.



Page 107

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Window Cleaning and High Dusting Service Contract
147357 (Ordinance S-44452) on April 18, 2018.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.;
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road;
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, Ariz.; and
Phoenix Convention Center - 100 N. 3rd St.
Council Districts: 1, 7, 8 and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Inger Erickson,
and the Aviation and Phoenix Convention Center Departments.




Page 108



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Deer Valley Airport Restaurant RCS Award at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport
(Ordinance S-48472)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Food and
Beverage Lease with Kind Hospitality, Inc. at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport for seven
years with one three-year renewal option. Further request to authorize the City
Treasurer to accept all funds and the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item.

Summary
On Sept. 16, 2020, Phoenix City Council authorized the Aviation Department to issue a
Revenue Contract Solicitation (RCS) for a new Food and Beverage operator of the
restaurant at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT). The goal of the RCS was to find a
viable restaurant operator to lease the Deer Valley Airport restaurant space, which had
been vacant since April 2020. The RCS further sought a restaurant concept and
design that would appeal to airport users and customers in the surrounding
community.

Kind Hospitality, Inc. (Kind) was recommended as the successful proposer by a
qualified evaluation panel.

Procurement Information
An initial RCS (RCS 21-002) was released on Oct. 20, 2020 and produced no
responses. Subsequent meetings with potential proposers identified concerns with the
condition of the restaurant space that would be addressed in the next RCS. This
procurement (RCS 22-001) was released on July 20, 2021. One response was
received and determined to be responsive.

On Dec. 16, 2021, the evaluation panel met and evaluated the proposal based on the
published evaluation criteria:
· Suitability of the Proposed Restaurant Concept and Design;
· Quality and suitability of menu items;
· Qualifications and experience;
· Amount of Remodel Investment; and



Page 109

· Proposed First Year Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG).

The Panel recommendation was reached by consensus in consideration of these
criteria. After a local and national outreach effort and a competitive RCS process, Kind
is recommended for award of the Deer Valley Airport Restaurant Concessions Lease,
with 955 out of 1000 points.

In the RCS the City anticipated the replacement of non-working kitchen fixtures at a
total cost to the City of approximately $20,000. Kind has agreed to procure the
replacement fixtures in exchange for rent credits not to exceed $20,000. Title to the
replacement fixtures valued up to $20,000, based upon the City's valuation, will revert
to the City at the end of the lease term. The City also identified needed repairs to
underground plumbing and the kitchen floor. Kind has agreed to make these repairs to
the building, which the City would otherwise have to complete, in exchange for rent
credits not to exceed $130,000 based on estimates from qualified vendors, plus
reasonable contingencies. Total rent credits for these items will not exceed $150,000.

Contract Term
If approved, the term will be seven years with one three-year option to extend to be
exercised at the sole discretion of the Director of Aviation Services.

Financial Impact
Rent is based on percentage of gross sales or Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) of
$92,001, whichever is greater. Beginning with the second lease year and each year
thereafter, MAG shall be adjusted to 85 percent of the prior years' annual rent payment
or 100 percent of the first year MAG, whichever is greater. Expenses to the City will
include rent credits not to exceed $150,000 for replacement kitchen fixtures and
building repairs. Funding is available in the Aviation Department's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval of the item on Feb. 17,
2022, by a vote of 9-0.

Public Outreach
This solicitation process included all standard and required outreach efforts including
advertising in local and aviation industry publications.

Location
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 West Deer Valley Road
Council District: 1



Page 110

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 111



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Arizona
Early Childhood Development Board to Administer an Airport Worker Childcare
Scholarship Program (Ordinance S-48486)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona Early Childhood Development
and Health Board (known as First Things First) to administer a childcare scholarship
program for airport workers. As part of the IGA, the City of Phoenix and First Things
First agree to save and hold harmless, defend and indemnify each other from claims
resulting from either’s or wrongful acts or omissions. Per City Code 42-20,
indemnification of another public entity requires approval from the City Council. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Funding is available through the City’s allocation of the American Rescue Act Plan
(ARPA) funding received from the federal government and is under the Aviation
Childcare program of the ARPA strategic plan.

Summary
The aviation industry has been severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. One of
the most significant challenges to the return to normal operation has been the hiring
and retention of airport workers. To assist in mitigating these impacts at Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport, the City Council allocated $4 million in American Rescue
Plan Act funds to establish a childcare scholarship program for airport workers that
would support eligible participating families in returning to work.

To administer the program and ensure that funds are being directed to those most in
need, the Aviation Department is seeking to enter into an intergovernmental
agreement with First Things First, the statewide organization tasked with funding early
education programs for children age birth to five-years-old. Using the established
framework of First Things First's Quality First scholarship program and childcare star
rating system, the airport worker childcare scholarship program will allow eligible
airport workers whose families are low income (at 200 percent or below the federal
poverty level) to receive scholarships for childcare. As part of this agreement, First
Things First will verify income eligibility for the program, distribute funds to eligible
families, and provide reporting on program participation.



Page 112

Due to the lack of childcare options in the immediate vicinity of Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport, eligible families will be able to use the scholarships at any eligible
Quality First childcare program in Maricopa County.

Contract Term
The contract term will be for two years from the date this agreement is enacted by the
parties, with one, one-year option to extend.

Financial Impact
The program will be funded with $4 million in American Rescue Plan Act funds, from
the City's ARPA strategic plan.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved ARPA Strategic Plan Update, which included the childcare
scholarship program on Sept. 21, 2021.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 113



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Purchase of Residential 35-, 65- and 95-Liquid-Gallon Containers - Requirements
Contract, IFB 22-SW-037 (Ordinance S-48460)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Otto Environmental Systems, and IPL North America Inc., to provide residential 35-, 65
- and 95-liquid-gallon solid waste containers for Citywide solid waste services of green
organics, recyclables and refuse collections. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the agreement
will not exceed $20.25 million.

Summary
The agreement will provide 35-, 65-, 95-liquid-gallon containers on an as needed basis
for the City's fully-automated residential refuse, recycling and green organics collection
programs. Order quantities are contingent upon replacement needs for existing
containers as well as new containers for service area growth.

Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid 22-SW-37 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. Four offers were received by the City on Jan. 26, 2022. The offers
were evaluated based on responsiveness to all specifications, terms and conditions,
and lowest bid. The offers for solid waste containers are based on estimated annual
quantities; however, the final contract value factors in higher quantities needed based
on expected growth.

Otto Environmental Systems: $3,953,742.00
IPL North America Inc.: $4,032,635.33
Rehrig Pacific Company: $4,410,048.42
Sierra Container Group LLC: $4,482,000.00

Contract Term
The initial one-year contract term will begin on or about May 1, 2022, and end on April
30, 2023. Provisions of this contract include an option to extend the term for up to four
additional years, in increments of up to one-year, which may be exercised by the City
Manager or designee.



Page 114

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $20.25 million with an estimated annual
expenditure of $4.05 million.

Funding is available in the Public Works Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.




Page 115



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Purchase of One Cement Silo (Ordinance S-48466)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
BTE Body Company, Inc. for purchase of one Belgrade Cement Silo. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total
contract value will not exceed $72,500.

Summary
The Public Works Department is seeking to purchase one Belgrade 270 cement silo
for the Street Transportation Department. This silo will be used to off-load cement to
trucks that are dispatched throughout the City to repair streets and sidewalks. The
current cement silo has exceeded its service life and does not meet current
environmental requirements set forth by Maricopa County. This silo was deemed
necessary as a direct replacement to prevent additional site configuration costs, and to
meet the necessary environmental requirements.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10 normal competition was waived as
a result of a determination memo citing sole source. BTE Body Company is the sole
local distributor of the Belgrade 270 Cement Silo, with the price below.

BTE Body Company, Inc.: $72,456.31

Contract Term
This contract will begin on or about City Council approval on April 6, 2022 for the one-
time purchase of a cement silo.

Financial Impact
This item will have an estimated total contract value of $72,500.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's budget.

Location
4220 W. Glenrosa Ave.
Council District: 5


Page 116


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Street Transportation and Public Works departments.




Page 117



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
SR85 Landfill Tarp Purchase - IFB 22-SW-040 - Requirements Contract
(Ordinance S-48469)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
ConWal Inc., dba Southwestern Sales Co., to purchase tarps for the State Route 85
Landfill. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The aggregate contract value will not exceed $542,780.

Summary
The State Route 85 (SR85) Landfill is the City of Phoenix's primary waste disposal
landfill, located in Buckeye, Ariz. The SR85 Landfill uses tarps for alternative daily
cover and operates under a Master Facility Plan approved by the Arizona Department
of Environmental Quality (ADEQ). Tarps are the preferred alternative daily cover
because they save airspace, which in turn maximizes efficient use of the excavated
cell and increases the useful life of the landfill. Over time, these tarps must be replaced
due to normal wear and tear and degradation by light and heat.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid, 22-SW-040, was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. One offer was received by the City on Feb. 9, 2022. The offer was
evaluated based on responsiveness to all specifications, terms and conditions, and
lowest bid.

ConWal, Inc. dba Southwestern Sales Co.: $108,556

Contract Term
The initial two-year contract term will begin on or about June 1, 2022 through May 31,
2024. Provisions of the contract may include an option to extend the term for up to
three years, to be taken in one-year increments, which may be exercised by the City
Manager or designee.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $542,780, with an estimated annual
expenditure of $108,556.



Page 118

Funding is available in the Public Works Department's budget.

Location
The SR85 Landfill is located at 28633 W. Patterson Road, Buckeye, Ariz.
Council District: Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.




Page 119



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
One-time Purchase of Reachmaster Lift (Ordinance S-48473)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Mako Equipment, LLC for purchase of one battery-electric FS95 Reachmaster Lift.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. This item will have an aggregate amount not to exceed $286,939.

Summary
The Public Works Department seeks to purchase one battery-electric FS95
Reachmaster Falcon Lift for the Aviation Department. This supplemental lift will be
used to gain access to hard to reach areas, especially in Terminal 3 and the Rental
Car Center. This unit is able to self-load on trailers, fit through a standard doorway,
reach up to 95 feet, and fit into areas as narrow as three feet.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived as
a result of a determination memo citing sole source. Mako Equipment is the sole sales
and service provider in the Southwest Region for the FS95 lift.

Contract Term
This item will be for the one-time purchase of a FS95 Reachmaster Lift to begin on or
about City Council approval on April 6, 2022.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $286,939.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's budget.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Aviation and Public Works Departments.


Page 120



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
One-time Purchase of Two Raymond Reach Forklifts (Ordinance S-48474)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Raymond West Intralogistics Solutions, dba Handling Systems, Inc. to provide two
electric-powered Raymond Reach Forklifts. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. This item will have an aggregate
amount of up to $108,020.

Summary
The Public Works Department is seeking to purchase two Raymond 7500 Stance
Reach Forklifts for the Property Management unit at the Police property warehouse.
This electric-powered make and model of forklift is the only known unit that can
support impound shelving and retrieval operations at the warehouse. The two new
units will replace the units that are over 30 years old and have exceeded their 15-year
life span.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived as
the result of a determination memo citing sole source. Raymond West is the sole
distributor in Arizona of the Raymond Reach Forklifts. The price below is for one
forklift:

Raymond West Intralogistics Solutions: 7500 Reach Forklift, $49,324 (tax excluded)

Contract Term
This item will be for the one-time purchase of two forklifts starting on or about City
Council approval on April 6, 2022.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $108,020.

Funding is available in the Police Department's budget.

Location
Police Property Management Bureau - 100 E. Elwood St.


Page 121

Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and Deputy City Manager
Karen Peters, and the Police and Public Works Departments.




Page 122



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
56th Street: Thomas to Camelback Roads - Engineering Services - ST87210047
(Ordinance S-48451)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., to provide Engineering Services that include
design and bid assistance services for the 56th Street: Thomas to Camelback roads
project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will
not exceed $994,167.97.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to, electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to implement bicycle and pedestrian safety
improvements along the 1.5-mile-long section of 56th Street (a collector roadway)
between Thomas and Camelback roads.

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to: providing
complete final construction plans, specifications, and engineering estimates; data
collection information; topographic surveying, drainage memorandum, material reports,
various utility adjustments, and geotechnical investigations; preparing the required
documents for Environmental Clearance, Right-of-Way Acquisition, and Temporary
Construction Easements; and post-design bid assistance through award of
construction.


Page 123


Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Six firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Dibble & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Rank 3: Ritoch-Powell & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Rank 4: Horrocks Engineers, Inc.
Rank 5: Project Engineering Consultants, Ltd.
Rank 6: Olsson, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. will not exceed
$994,167.97, including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Public Outreach
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. will work with the City of Phoenix Public Outreach
firm on public engagement.

Location
56th Street: Thomas to Camelback roads
Council District: 6


Page 124


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 125



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Margaret T. Hance Park Improvements Phase 1B Garden Area - Construction
Manager at Risk Construction Services - Amendment - PA75200700 (Ordinance S
-48462)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 151798 with Haydon Building Corp., to provide additional Construction
Manager at Risk Construction Services for the Margaret T. Hance Park Improvements
Phase 1B Garden Area project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments
to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The additional fee for services included in this amendment will not exceed $7 million.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to transform the identity of Margaret T. Hance Park and
activate the Central Plaza with day and night programming featuring visual landmarks,
shade elements, gardens, a playground, an interactive water feature, a cafe pavilion,
and public restrooms. Improvements have been identified at a conceptual level and
include park land roughly one block east and west of Central Avenue.

This amendment is necessary to continue with the construction of the Margaret T.
Hance Park Improvements. This amendment will provide additional funds and time to
the agreement.

Haydon Building Corp.'s additional services include, but are not limited to: constructing
Phase 1B with planting, pathways, a shade canopy, lighting, seating, donor signage,
temporary site sign wall, irrigation, temporary steps and paths for the Garden area and
adjacent planting areas.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment is one year from the issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact


Page 126

· The initial agreement for Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Construction
Services was approved for an amount not to exceed $8.6 million, including all
subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
· An amendment increased the agreement value by an additional $113,336.37, for a
new total amount not to exceed $8,713,336.37, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.
· This amendment will increase the agreement by an additional $7 million, for a new
total amount not to exceed $15,713,336.37, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.

Funding for this amendment is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's
Capital Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will
separately review and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any
amendments. Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered
agreement services, which may extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Park, Arts, Education and Equality Subcommittee:
· Recommended approval of this item on May 24, 2017, by a vote of 3-0.

Parks and Recreation Board approved:
· Sponsorship Agreement for Phase 1A with Fiesta Events, Inc. on Aug. 15, 2019.

The City Council approved:
· Design Services Agreement 145602 (Ordinance S-43648) on July 6, 2017; and
· Design Services Agreement 145602 - Amendment 1 (Ordinance S-44819) on June
20, 2018; and
· CMAR Preconstruction Services Agreement 149558 (Ordinance S-45494) on April
3, 2019; and
· Intergovernmental Agreement 151563 between State of Arizona and City of Phoenix
for Margaret T. Hance Park Joint Repair Project (Ordinance S-46304) on Jan. 8,
2020; and
· CMAR Construction Services Agreement 151798 (Ordinance S-46451) on Mar. 18,
2020; and
· Intergovernmental Agreement 151563 between State of Arizona and City of Phoenix
for Margaret T. Hance Park Joint Repair Project - Amendment (Ordinance S-46835)
on July 1, 2020; and
· CMAR Construction Services Agreement 151798 - Amendment (Ordinance S-


Page 127

47364) on March 17, 2021; and
· CMAR Preconstruction Services Agreement 149558 - Amendment 1 (Ordinance S-
47513) on May 5, 2021.

Location
67 W. Culver St.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Inger Erickson and Mario Paniagua,
the Parks and Recreation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 128



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Environmental Site Assessment On-Call Services for Fiscal Years 2022-23
through 2023-24 (Ordinance S-48476)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with the consultants listed on Attachment A, to provide Environmental Site
Assessment On-Call Services citywide. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreements as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The total fee for services will not exceed $7.5 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications; cable
television; railroads; and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing Environmental Site
Assessment On-Call Services that include, but are not limited to: performing Phase I,
Phase II, and Phase III Environmental Site Assessments, biological surveys,
brownfields related work, environmental program support services, and other related
environmental studies and investigations on real property for the City of Phoenix.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Twenty-three firms submitted
proposals and are listed in Attachment A.


Page 129


Contract Term
The term of each agreement is up to three years, or up to $750,000, whichever occurs
first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the
term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for each of the On-Call consultants will not exceed $750,000,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services will not
exceed $7.5 million.

Funding is available in the Citywide Department’s Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any On-Call task order. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 130
ATTACHMENT A
Selected Firms
Rank 1: Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Rank 2: GHD Services, Inc.
Rank 3: Adams and Wendt, Inc.
Rank 4: Stearns, Conrad and Schmidt, Consulting Engineers, Inc. dba SCS
Engineers, Inc.
Rank 5: AZTEC Engineering Group, Inc.
Rank 6: Brown and Caldwell, Inc.
Rank 7: Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.
Rank 8: Atlas Technical Consultants LLC
Rank 9: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Rank 10: NV5, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 11: Matrix New World Engineering, Land Surveying and Landscape
Architecture, PC
Rank 12: Speedie & Associates, Inc.
Rank 13: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Rank 14: Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Rank 15: Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Services Consultants, Inc.
Rank 16: Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
Rank 17: Water, Civil and Environmental, Inc.
Rank 18: Pinyon Environmental, Inc.
Rank 19: Buffalo Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Rank 20: Universal Engineering Sciences
Rank 21: Cordova Environmental Consulting, PLLC
Rank 22: TRC Environmental Corporation
Rank 23: Commonwealth Heritage Group, Inc.




Page 131



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with Maricopa County Department of
Transportation to Design and Construct a Traffic Signal at 67th Avenue and
Vineyard Road (Ordinance S-48477)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Maricopa County Department of Transportation
for a new traffic signal at 67th Avenue and Vineyard Road. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-20 to
authorize indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total estimated financial impact
to the City is $70,424.

Summary
67th Avenue and Vineyard Road is an existing unsignalized intersection with stop
control in all directions. The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT)
currently maintains and operates the north and south legs of 67th Avenue, and
maintains and operates Vineyard Road east of the intersection as well. The City
maintains and operates the west 33 feet of 67th Avenue, including a right-turn lane and
pedestrian facilities, and maintains and operates Vineyard Road west of the
intersection. MCDOT evaluated the intersection in June 2018 and determined the
intersection met traffic signal warrants based on the warrant conditions from the 2009
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The traffic signal cost will be shared with
MCDOT contributing 75 percent and the City contributing 25 percent. The traffic signal
will be installed, operated and maintained by MCDOT.

Contract Term
The agreement will be effective on the date it is executed by all the governing
organizations and shall remain in effect until all stipulations previously indicated have
been satisfied.

Financial Impact
The total estimated City contribution is $70,424 or about 25 percent of the total, which
is estimated at $281,695.



Page 132

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget.

Location
67th Avenue and Vineyard Road
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 133



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona Department of Transportation to
Relocate City of Phoenix Water and Sewer Mains for Interstate 10 Broadway
Curve Improvement Project (Ordinance S-48470)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation to
relocate water and sewer mains in conflict with the Interstate 10 Broadway Curve
Improvement Project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority, as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The total value of this agreement will not exceed $415,000.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications; cable
television; railroads and other modes of transportation.

Also request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-
20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction
involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The Interstate 10 (I-10) Broadway Curve Improvement Project is planned to improve a
segment of I-10 between the I-10 and Interstate 17 (I-17) Split Traffic Interchange and
Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway (Loop 202-South Mountain Freeway). The Water
Services Department (WSD) owns water and wastewater infrastructure throughout the
I-10 Broadway Curve Improvement Project area. Some of the WSD-owned facilities
were installed after I-10 was constructed, therefore those facilities do not have prior
rights and must be located at the expense of the City. The Arizona Department of
Transportation (ADOT) will relocate the affected facilities through use of a procured
contractor, and the City will reimburse ADOT for the construction costs associated with


Page 134

relocation of those facilities with non-prior rights.

Contract Term
This agreement will begin on or about April 1, 2022 and will end on Dec. 31, 2024.

Financial Impact
The total value for this agreement will not exceed $415,000.

Funding for this project is available in the Water Services Department Capital
Improvement Program Budget.

Location
I-10, from the I-10 and I-17 Split Traffic Interchange to Congressman Ed Pastor
Freeway.
Council Districts: 6 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 135



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona Department of Transportation to
Fund City of Phoenix Water and Sewer Inspections for Interstate 10 Broadway
Curve Improvement Project (Ordinance S-48471)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation to fund
water and sewer inspections associated with the Interstate 10 Broadway Curve
Improvement Project. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and
the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. The City will be
reimbursed in an amount not to exceed $135,000.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications; cable
television; railroads and other modes of transportation.

Also request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-
20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction
involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The Interstate 10 (I-10) Broadway Curve Improvement Project is planned to improve a
segment of I-10 between the I-10 and Interstate 17 (I-17) Split Traffic Interchange and
Congressman Ed Pastor Freeway (Loop 202-South Mountain Freeway). The Water
Services Department (WSD) owns water and wastewater infrastructure throughout the
I-10 Broadway Curve Improvement Project area. Some of the WSD-owned facilities
were installed prior to I-10 being constructed, therefore those facilities have prior rights
and must be relocated at the expense of the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT). ADOT will relocate and protect existing WSD facilities with prior rights at their
cost. The City will hire a consultant to provide inspections to affected facilities and
ADOT will reimburse the City for the inspection costs associated with prior right


Page 136

relocations and protection of existing prior right facilities in close proximity to the new
project improvements in an amount not to exceed $135,000.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about April 1, 2022 and the term of this agreement is
through Dec. 31, 2024.

Financial Impact
The City will be reimbursed in an amount not to exceed $135,000.

Location
I-10, from the I-10 and I-17 Split Traffic Interchange to Congressman Ed Pastor
Freeway.
Council Districts: 6 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 137



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Project Land Use License for Royal Palm Bicycle and Pedestrian
Bridge Transportation Enhancements - ST87600061 (Ordinance S-48479)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee to enter into a Land Use
License with Salt River Project for the continued use and maintenance of a pedestrian
bridge at 15th and Dunlap avenues. Further request the City Council to grant an
exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18.

Summary
This Salt River Project Land License is a renewal of a License that was entered into for
work associated with the Royal Palm Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge Transportation
Enhancements project and allowed the City to maintain roadways, utilities,
landscaping along with other necessary purposes located within USA Fee Property.
The original License was executed on May 1, 2012, and expires April 30, 2022.

Contract Term
The term of the Land License shall be for 10 years beginning May 1, 2022, and ending
April 30, 2032. The license may be renewed upon written agreement by the parties.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix for these licenses.

Location
15th and Dunlap avenues
Council Districts: 3 and 5

Responsible Department
These items are submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 138



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Project Construction License for Water Main Replacement from
Elwood Street to Broadway Road and 16th to 20th Streets - WS85509046
(Ordinance S-48482)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Construction
License with Salt River Project for work associated with a City of Phoenix Water
Services Department project. Further request the City Council to grant an exception
pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents
pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions
that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18.

Summary
The City is constructing waterline improvements, and the purpose of this license is to
allow the City to install new waterlines that will parallel Salt River Project irrigation
facilities. This work is in conjunction with City Project WS85509046 Water Main
Replacement in the area bounded by Elwood Street to Broadway Road and 16th to
20th streets.

Contract Term
The term of the Construction License is one year, effective when the City begins
construction, expected to be May 2022.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix for this license.

Location
Area Bounded by Elwood Street to Broadway Road and 16th to 20th streets.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 139



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Telecommunications Services and Interstate Telecommunications Services
License with Teleport Communications America, LLC (Ordinance S-48480)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a non-exclusive,
revocable license with Teleport Communications America, LLC to construct, install,
operate, maintain, and use public highways in the City of Phoenix to provide
telecommunications services and interstate telecommunications services in, under,
over, and across public rights-of-way in the City subject to terms and conditions
contained in the license and Phoenix City Code. Further request the licensee sign the
license within 60 days of City Council action or this authorization will expire.

Summary
The license will be for a period of five years, contain appropriate insurance and
indemnification provisions, require a performance bond and security fund, provide for
terms of transfer and revocation, and provide for compensation for the commercial use
of public rights-of-way while permitting the City to manage the right-of-way.

Contract Term
The license is for a five-year Telecommunications Services and Interstate
Telecommunications Services License with an option for a one-time renewal.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City. Per Phoenix City Code, Licensee will pay an
annual fee to the City based on a formula using linear footage and the Consumer Price
Index.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 140



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Telecommunications Services and Interstate Telecommunications Services
License with McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, LLC (Ordinance S-
48481)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a non-exclusive,
revocable license with McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, LLC to construct,
install, operate, maintain, and use public highways in the City of Phoenix to provide
telecommunications services and interstate telecommunications services in, under,
over, and across public rights-of-way in the City subject to terms and conditions
contained in the license and Phoenix City Code. Further request that the licensee sign
the license within 60 days of City Council action or this authorization will expire.

Summary
The license will be for a period of five years, contain appropriate insurance and
indemnification provisions, require a performance bond and security fund, provide for
terms of transfer and revocation, and provide for compensation for the commercial use
of public rights-of-way while permitting the City to manage the right-of-way.

Contract Term
The license is for a five-year Telecommunications Services and Interstate
Telecommunications Services License with an option for a one-time renewal.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix. Per Phoenix City Code, Licensee
will pay an annual fee to the City based on a formula using linear footage and the
Consumer Price Index.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 141



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Telecommunications Services and Interstate Telecommunications Services
License with Arcadian Infracom 1, LLC (Ordinance S-48483)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a non-exclusive,
revocable license with Arcadian Infracom 1, LLC to construct, install, operate, maintain
and use the Public Highways in the City of Phoenix to provide telecommunications
services and interstate telecommunications services in, under, over, and across public
rights-of-way in the City, subject to the terms and conditions contained in the license
and Phoenix City Code. Further request that the licensee sign the license within 60
days of City Council action, or this authorization will expire.

Summary
The license will be for a period of five years, contain appropriate insurance and
indemnification provisions, require a performance bond and a security fund, provide for
terms of transfer and revocation, and provide for compensation for the commercial use
of public rights-of-way while permitting the City to manage the rights-of-way.

Contract Term
The request is for a five-year Telecommunications Services and Interstate
Telecommunications Services License with an option for a one-time renewal.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix. Licensee will pay an annual fee
based on a formula using linear footage and the Consumer Price Index.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 142



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Interstate Telecommunications Services License with MCI Communications
Services, Inc. (Ordinance S-48484)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a non-exclusive,
revocable license with MCI Communications Services, Inc. to construct, install,
operate, maintain, and use public highways in the City of Phoenix to provide interstate
telecommunications services in, under, over, and across public rights-of-way in the City
subject to terms and conditions contained in the license and Phoenix City Code.
Further request that the licensee sign the license within 60 days of City Council action
or this authorization will expire.

Summary
The license will be for a period of five years, contain appropriate insurance and
indemnification provisions, require a performance bond and security fund, provide for
terms of transfer and revocation, and provide for compensation for the commercial use
of public rights-of-way while permitting the City to manage the right-of-way.

Contract Term
The license is for a five-year Telecommunications Services and Interstate
Telecommunications Services License with an option for a one-time renewal.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix. Per Phoenix City Code, Licensee
will pay an annual fee to the City based on a formula using linear footage and the
Consumer Price Index.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 143



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Citywide General Electrical Job Order Contracting Services - 4108JOC207
(Ordinance S-48485)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into three separate
master agreements, to provide Citywide General Electrical Job Order Contracting
services. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreements as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee total for
services will not exceed $30 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications; cable
television; railroads; and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The Job Order Contract (JOC) contractors’ services will be used on an as-needed
basis to provide General Electrical services for departments citywide. Additionally, the
JOC contractors will be responsible for fulfilling Small Business Enterprise program
requirements.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Three firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.




Page 144

Selected Firms
Rank 1: AJP Electric, Inc.
Rank 2: Sellers & Sons, Inc.
Rank 3: LLR Electric, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 4: KWR Construction, Inc.
Rank 5: K2 Electric
Rank 6: Kortman, Inc.
Rank 7: Spectra Electrical Services, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of each master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $10 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The master agreement values for each of the JOC contractors will not exceed $10
million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services
will not exceed $30 million.

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute job order
agreements performed under these master agreements for up to $2 million each. In no
event will any job order agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to
increase the limit.

Funding is available in the citywide departments' Capital Improvement Program and/or
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 145



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Water Services Department Pavement Restoration Job Order Contract Program -
Construction Administration and Inspection Support Services Amendment -
8423600000 (Ordinance S-48453)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
Agreements: 148972 with Consultant Engineering, Inc.; and 148973 with Tristar
Engineering and Management, Inc. to provide additional Construction Administration
and Inspection Services for the Water Services Department Pavement Restoration Job
Order Contract Program. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreements as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The additional fee for services included in the amendments will not exceed $3,356,500
for Consultant Engineering, Inc. and $3,356,500 for Tristar Engineering and
Management, Inc., for a total not to exceed $6,713,000.

Summary
The purpose of this project is for the consultants to perform Construction
Administration and Inspection (CA&I) services on an as-needed basis to support the
Water Services Department (WSD) Pavement Restoration Job Order Contract (JOC)
Program.

The amendments are necessary due to pavement inspection work exceeding the
WSD's original expectations. In 2019, WSD began managing the Pavement
Restoration project to ensure compliance with the City's amended Street Pavement
Cut Ordinance. The additional funding for Consultant Engineering, Inc. (CEI) and
Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. (Tristar) is based on expected inspection
requirements given the pavement restoration needs through the contract timeframe
and will provide the continuity of services that is needed to support the Pavement
Restoration JOC Program.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged. The scope of work identified and incorporated
into the agreements prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and
work may extend past the termination of the agreements. No additional changes may
be executed after the end of the term.


Page 146


Financial Impact
· The initial agreements for CA&I services with CEI and Tristar were approved for an
amount not-to-exceed $2.35 million each, including all subconsultant and
reimbursable costs.
· An amendment for Tristar was approved for an amount not-to-exceed $587,000, for
a new total amount not to exceed $2,937,000, including all subconsultants and
reimbursable costs.
· These amendments will increase both agreements by an additional $3,356,500
each, for a new total amount not to exceed $5,706,500 for CEI and $6,293,500 for
Tristar, including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding for the amendments is available in the Water Services Department's
Operating budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments. Payments may
be made up to agreement limits for all rendered services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Construction Administration and Inspection Services Agreement 148972 with CEI
and 148973 with Tristar (Ordinance S-45230) on Dec. 12, 2018 and;
· Amendment to Agreement 148973 with Tristar (Ordinance S-47516) on May 5,
2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 147



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
CEM Moisture Microwave and Analyzers Equipment, Repairs and Maintenance
Agreement - Request for Award (Ordinance S-48458)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with CEM Corporation to provide maintenance, parts and repairs for the CEM Smart 5
and Smart 6 Moisture Analyzers. Further request authorization for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the agreement will not exceed
$350,000.

Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide necessary maintenance, repairs, parts
and consumable items for Moisture Analyzers at the Water Production and Wastewater
Treatment Plants in the Water Services Department. Moisture Analyzers determine the
solids percent of various treatment process samples. Results obtained from the
sample analysis are used to monitor, optimize, and control the solids thickening and
dewatering processes at the plants.

Direct selection is necessary because CEM Corporation is the sole authorized
manufacturer, distributor and service provider for CEM Moisture Microwave Analyzers
and Equipment.

CEM’s services include, but are not limited to: maintenance, repairs, parts and
consumables.

Procurement Information
An exception to the procurement process was determined to select the Contractor, as
set forth in City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10. A direct selection was made
because there is only one known capable supplier of goods and services due to the
unique nature of the requirement, supplier, or market condition.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about April 1, 2022 for a seven-year aggregate term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for CEM Corporation will not exceed $350,000.


Page 148


Funding is available in the Water Services Department’s Operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 149



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Central Arizona Water Clearinghouse (Martin & McCoy) - Amendment (Ordinance
S-48459)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
consent to assignment of Central Arizona Water Clearinghouse Project Management
Services Contract 153668 with Martin & McCoy, LLC., to AMP Insights.

Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to consent to assignment of the agreement with
Martin & McCoy, LLC, to AMP Insights. The lead consultant at Martin & McCoy is
leaving the company and taking a position with AMP Insights; the amendment would
allow project-related work performed by both AMP Insights and the former Martin &
McCoy consultant to move forward unhindered.

The contract provides project management services required to develop the Central
Arizona Water Clearinghouse platform prototype. The Clearinghouse is a collaborative
project developed by the City of Phoenix and an external team of water professionals,
academics, and non-profit organizations. The purpose of the Clearinghouse is to
create water management tools to facilitate market-based transactions that will
advance water resource sustainability for the City and other water users in Central
Arizona.

Contract Term
The contract term is unchanged by this amendment and will run through Dec. 31,
2023, with an existing option for the City to extend the term for an additional three
years.

Financial Impact
There is no requested change to the existing spending authorization for this contract
as part of this amendment.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Acceptance and disbursement of U.S. Bureau of Reclamation ‘WaterSMART Water
Marketing Strategy’ Grant (Ordinance S-45870) on June 26, 2019; and


Page 150

· Central Arizona Water Clearinghouse Contract 153668 (Ordinance S-47164) on
Dec. 16, 2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 151



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Lima 8 - PLAT 210091 - North of Pasadena Avenue and West of 16th
Avenue

Plat: 210091
Project: 21-1080
Name of Plat: Lima 8
Owner: Massimo Sommacapagna, TDP 16th and Camelback, LLC
Engineer: Paul M. Miller, RLS
Request: An 8 Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Feb. 25, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located north of Pasadena Avenue and west of 16th Avenue.
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 152



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Seasons at Vista Del Sur - PLAT 210040 - Northeast Corner of 99th
Avenue and Southern Avenue

Plat: 210040
Project: 20-2998
Name of Plat: Seasons at Vista Del Sur
Owner: Prestige Development Inc N W
Engineer: Ronnie E. Dorsey, RLS
Request: A 153 Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 7, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the northeast corner of 99th Avenue and Southern Avenue.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 153



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - SWC 40th Street and Southern Avenue - PLAT 210076 - Southwest
Corner of 40th Street and Southern Avenue

Plat: 210076
Project: 19-3790
Name of Plat: SWC 40th Street and Southern Avenue
Owner: CRP/Brown 40th and Southern Owner, LLC
Engineer: Anthony L. Slater, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Feb. 23, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the southwest corner of 40th Street and Southern Avenue.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 154



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1230 (Ordinance G-6977)

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1230. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with a portion of Z-122-00-1 and the entitlements are fully
vested.

Summary
To rezone land generally located approximately 348 feet east of the southeast corner
of the intersection of 19th Avenue and Happy Valley Road
Application No.: Z-122-00-1
Zoning: C-2 and CP/GCP
Owner: Exul Deer Valley Project, LLC; Stormy Property Holdings 1, LLC; Cobblestone
Propco, LLC; Whispering Wind, LLC; Brent and AMI Ducoing Living Trust; Bar
Industries, LLC; Guliano, LLC; Palo Cristi, LLC; OFMM3, LLC; Pratte Holdings, LLC;
and PRA3 Investments, LLC
Acreage: 29.74 acres of C-2 and 8.10 acres of CP/GCP

Location
Approximately 348 feet east of the southeast corner of the intersection of 19th Ave and
Happy Valley Road.
Address: 1717, 1725, 1825 W. Happy Valley Road; and 1505, 1506, 1509, 1513, 1523,
1606, 1610, 1614 W. Whispering Wind Drive.
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 155
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1230.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1230, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 23rd day of March,

2022.



_____________________________________
MAYOR




ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




Page 156
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney



By:_____________________________
_____________________________


REVIEWED BY:



____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




PL:tml:LF21-3802:3-23-2022




Page 157
Page 158



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-75-21-2 -
Approximately 460 Feet South of the Southwest Corner of North Valley Parkway
and Dove Valley Road (Ordinance G-6978)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 M-R NBCOD (Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise, North Black Canyon Overlay
District), CP/GCP M-R PCD NBCOD (Commerce Park/General Commerce Park, Mid-
Rise, Planned Community District, North Black Canyon Overlay District), and CP/GCP
M-R NBCOD (Commerce Park/General Commerce Park, Mid-Rise, North Black
Canyon Overlay District) to C-2 NBCOD (Intermediate Commercial, North Black
Canyon Overlay District) to allow an automotive service facility.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 M-R NBCOD (0.60 acres), CP/GCP M-R PCD NBCOD (0.48
acres), CP/GCP M-R NBCOD (0.18 acres)
Proposed Zoning: C-2 NBCOD
Acreage: 1.26 acres
Proposed Use: Automotive Service Facility

Owner: Quick Quack Car Wash Holdings, LLC
Applicant: Neil Feaser, RKAA Architects Inc.
Representative: Greg Clark, KCAS II, LLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on Feb.
10, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 3-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Mar. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the North Gateway Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 460 feet south of the southwest corner of North Valley Parkway and
Dove Valley Road.
Council District: 2


Page 159

Parcel Address: 32880 N. North Valley Parkway.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 160
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-75-21-2) FROM C-2 M-R NBCOD
(INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, MID-RISE, NORTH BLACK
CANYON OVERLAY DISTRICT), CP/GCP M-R PCD NBCOD
(COMMERCE PARK/GENERAL COMMERCE PARK, MID-RISE,
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT, NORTH BLACK CANYON
OVERLAY DISTRICT), AND CP/GCP M-R NBCOD (COMMERCE
PARK/GENERAL COMMERCE PARK, MID-RISE, NORTH BLACK
CANYON OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO C-2 NBCOD
(INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, NORTH BLACK CANYON
OVERLAY DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.26-acre site located approximately 460 feet

south of the southwest corner of North Valley Parkway and Dove Valley Road in a

portion of Section 13 and 14, Township 5 North, Range 2 East, as described more

specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from 0.60 acres of “C-2 M-R NBCOD”

(Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise, North Black Canyon Overlay District), 0.48 acres

of “CP/GCP M-R PCD NBCOD” (Commerce Park/General Commerce Park, Mid-Rise,




Page 161
Planned Community District, North Black Canyon Overlay District), and 0.18 acres of

“CP/GCP M-R NBCOD” (Commerce Park/General Commerce Park, Mid-Rise, North

Black Canyon Overlay District), to “C-2 NBCOD” (Intermediate Commercial, North Black

Canyon Overlay District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped November 22, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations and
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. All elevations of the building shall contain a minimum of three building
materials as well as architectural embellishments and detailing such as textural
changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size and location,
and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. All buildings, wall colors, and materials shall be in compliance with the North
Black Canyon Overlay District with specific regard to colors being muted and
blending, rather than contrasting strongly, with the surrounding desert
environment, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances and public sidewalks using the most direct route for
pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or another
material, other than those used to pave parking surfaces and drive aisles, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.




Page 162
6. A minimum of 75 percent of pedestrian pathways and sidewalks shall be
shaded by a structure, landscaping at maturity, or a combination of the two, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. A minimum of two inverted U-bicycle spaces for guests or employees shall be
provided on site and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. Median openings along North Valley Parkway are prohibited unless otherwise
approved by the Street Transportation Department.

9. The developer shall provide conduit and junction boxes at the northwest corner
of the southern (east/west) collector street and North Valley Parkway for future
traffic signal equipment, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

10. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

11. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeology survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

12. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determine such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

13. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 6th day of April, 2022.




Page 163
________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 164
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-75-21-2

LEGAL DESCRIPTION – LOT 2

A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST
OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 456.50 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH VALLEY PARKWAY,
BEING A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1502.39 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 72
DEGREES 04 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANDLE OF 00 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 52 SECONDS AN
ARC LENGTH OF 6.93 FEET;

THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH 67 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 32
SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 75.74 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
58.80 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
218.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE PROPOSED NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
COMMITMENT WAY, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 470.00,
THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 00 DEGREES, 00 MINUTES 03 SECONDS
WEST;

THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 23 SECONDS AN
ARC LENGTH OF 190.64 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 13 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
37.75 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH
VALLEY PARKWAY TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE




Page 165
TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1502.39 FEET, THE CENTER OF
WHICH BEARS NORTH 65 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST;

THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 16 SECONDS AN
ARC LENGTH OF 177.55 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

COMPRISING 36,557.01 SF OR 0.8392 AC, MORE OR LESS.




Page 166
Page 167



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-1-22-6 -
Southeast Corner of 32nd Place and Camelback Road (Ordinance G-6979)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
-O (Residential Office District) to C-O/G-O (Restricted Commercial District, General
Office Option) to allow a bank office.


Summary
Current Zoning: R-O
Proposed Zoning: C-O/G-O
Acreage: 0.46 acres
Proposed Use: Bank Office

Owner: BA 32 Pacific, LLC.
Applicant: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell, LLC
Representative: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell, LLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Camelback East Village Planning Committee did not review the case.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on March 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southeast corner of 32nd Place and Camelback Road.
Council District: 6
Parcel Addresses: 3237 E. Camelback Road.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 168
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-1-22-6) FROM R-O (RESIDENTIAL OFFICE DISTRICT)
TO C-O/G-O (COMMERCIAL OFFICE/GRNERAL OFFICE
DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 0.46 acre site located on the southeast corner

of 32nd Place and Camelback Road in a portion of Section 24, Township 2 North, Range

3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from “R-O”

(Residential Office District) to “C-O/G-O” (Commercial Office/General Office District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:



Page 169
1. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size
and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

2. A minimum of two bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall
adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

3. The developer shall dedicate a 10-foot-wide sidewalk easement for the south
side of Camelback Road, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

5. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.

6. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion

of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of

any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the

remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 6th day of April, 2022.




________________________________


Page 170
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 171
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-1-22-6


THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED PHOENIX, IN THE
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

PARCEL NO. 1:

Lot 10, of CHESTLEY VILLA, according to Book 61 of Maps, page 42; and also that
portion of the abandoned alley lying East of and adjacent to Lot 10 as set forth in
Resolution of Abandonment in Recording No. 88-079424 and in Re-Recording No.
88-083484 and Amended in Recording No. 88- 357906, records of Maricopa County,
Arizona.

PARCEL NO. 2:

That portion of Abandoned Roadway, pursuant to Resolution recorded in Recording
No. 20180674912, records of Maricopa County, Arizona, described as follows:

The South 10 feet of the right-of-way for Camelback Road lying immediately North
of and adjoining the North line of Lot 10, CHESTLEY VILLA, according to the plat of
record in the office of the County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, in Book
61 of Maps at page 42, bounded on the East by the Northerly prolongation of the
East line of said Lot 10, and on the West by a curve, concave Southeasterly, having
an external tangent distance of 30.12 feet, said curve being tangent to the West line
of said Lot 10, and tangent to a line parallel with and 10 feet North of the North line
of said Lot 10.

APN: 170-20-010

A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA




Page 172
Page 173



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-SP-6-21-7 -
Southeast Corner of the Loop 202 Freeway and Southern Avenue (Ordinance G-
6976)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
from S-1 (Approved C-2) (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved Intermediate
Commercial District) to C-2 SP (Intermediate Commercial District, Special Permit) to
allow a self-service storage warehouse and underlying commercial uses.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 (Approved C-2)
Proposed Zoning: C-2 SP
Acreage: 3.29 acres
Proposal: Self-service storage warehouse and underlying commercial uses

Owner: REXCO S202, LLC
Applicant: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design
Representative: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Laveen Village Planning Committee heard this case and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with modified stipulations, on
Feb. 14, 2022, by a vote of 5-4.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Mar. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report with an additional
stipulation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southeast corner of the Loop 202 freeway and Southern Avenue.
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: N/A

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.

Page 174
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-SP-6-21-7) FROM S-1 (APPROVED C-2) (RANCH OR
FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT, APPROVED INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) TO C-2 SP (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SPECIAL PERMIT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 3.29-acre site located at the southeast

corner of the Loop 202 Freeway and Southern Avenue in a portion of Section 31,

Township 1 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is hereby

changed from “S-1 (Approved C-2)” (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved

Intermediate Commercial District) to “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial District) with a

Special Permit to allow a self-service storage warehouse and underlying commercial

uses.

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.



Page 175
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped March 1, 2022, with specific regard to the following, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

a. The north elevation of Building A, and east elevation of Building B shall
incorporate windows.

b. The north elevation of Building A shall incorporate a decorative silo.

c. The north and east elevations of Building C shall incorporate decorative
elements such as pitched roofs consistent with the elevations of
Buildings A and B.

d. A minimum of three distinct building materials shall be utilized on all
building elevations.

2. All uncovered surface parking lot areas for employees and customers shall be
landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper size large canopy drought tolerant
shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the parking area and
achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as approved by Planning and
Development Department.

3. Pedestrian walkways connecting the building to adjacent public sidewalks shall
be shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using large canopy drought tolerant
shade trees at maturity and/or architectural shade.

4. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts with parking and drive aisle
surfaces, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Vehicular crossings shall be kept to a minimum.

5. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near the building entrance of each enclosed
commercial building and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred
Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.




Page 176
6. The developer shall dedicate a 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE)
along the south side of Southern Avenue and construct a minimum 10-foot
wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the easement, in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail indicated in Section 429 and as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the
developer shall work with the Site Planning section on an alternate design
through the technical appeal process.

7. The developer shall dedicate minimum 55 feet of right-of-way and
construct/permit the south side of Southern Avenue as required by MCDOT
and the Street Transportation Department.

8. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

9. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

10. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.

11. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.

12. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 6th day of April, 2022.


Page 177
________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 178
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-SP-6-21-7


THAT PORTION OF NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, OF THE GILA SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT FOUND PK NAIL IN PAVEMENT MARKING THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31, FROM WHICH BEARS FOUND BRASS CAP IN
HAND HOLE STAMPED “LS54404” MARKING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF
SAID SECTION 31, BEARS NORTH 89°58'48" WEST (BASIS OF BEARINGS) 2644.65
FEET; AND FROM WHICH A FOUND MARICOPA COUNTY ALUMINUM CAP
MARKING THE EAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31 BEARS SOUTH 00°43'54"
EAST 2635.30 FEET;

THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, NORTH
89°58'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1278.89 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00°00’00” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 33.00 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 309.64 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 69.40 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 155.67 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 320.34 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 02°07'27" WEST ALONG A LINE 25.00 FEET WEST OF AND
PARALLEL WITH THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ARIZONA LOOP 202 RIGHT-
OF-WAY, AS SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY IS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 2016-246056,
OFFICIAL RECORDS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER, A DISTANCE OF 465.72
FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89°58'48" EAST ALONG A LINE 33.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND
PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE
OF 268.20 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

CONTAINING 131,594 SQUARE FEET, OR, 3.021 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR
LESS.




Page 179
Page 180



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM FEB. 2, 2022) - Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption -
Rezoning Application Z-47-21-4 - Approximately 400 Feet Northwest of the
Northwest Corner of 33rd Avenue and Grand Avenue (Ordinance G-6952)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-3 (General Commercial District) to C-3 DNS/WVR (General Commercial District,
Density Waiver) to allow multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-3
Proposed Zoning: C-3 DNS/WVR
Acreage: 4.88 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Owner: P WEST PROPERTIES XX, LLC
Applicant: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Alhambra Village Planning Committee heard this case on Sept. 28,
2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with an additional
stipulation by a vote of 12-0.
PC Action: This case was continued by the Planning Commission on Oct. 7, 2021,
Nov. 4, 2021, and Dec. 2, 2021. The Planning Commission heard this case on Jan. 6,
2022 and recommended approval, per the Alhambra Village Planning Committee
recommendation, with an additional stipulation by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Approximately 400 feet northwest of the northwest corner of 33rd Avenue and Grand
Avenue.
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 3400 Grand Ave.




Page 181

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 182
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(Z-47-21-4) FROM C-3 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) TO
C-3 DNS/WVR (GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, DENSITY
WAIVER).

____________


BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 4.88-acre site located approximately 400 feet

northwest of the northwest corner of 33rd Avenue and Grand Avenue, in a portion of

Section 26, Township 2 North and Range 2 East, as described more specifically in

Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “C-3” (General Commercial District) to “C-3

DNS/WVR” (General Commercial District with a density waiver).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




Page 183
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall utilize the standards contained in the R-5 (Multifamily
Residence District) zoning district development standard, except as modified
by the below stipulations and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

2. A minimum of 6 percent of the gross project area shall be retained as open
space and be shaded to a minimum 50 percent by minimum 2-inch caliper
large canopy shade trees and architectural shade such as ramadas that shall
account for no more than 25 percent of the required shade area, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The developer shall replenish the existing landscape planters adjacent to
Grand Avenue per the C-3 streetscape landscape standards for planting type,
size and quantity contained in Chapter 624.E.4.e of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, unless underground utilities and/or drainage are found to conflict,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility
conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development
Department on alternative design solutions consistent with the creation of a
comfortable pedestrian environment.

4. The developer shall incorporate and maintain bicycle infrastructure as
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. Secure bicycle parking for residents at a rate of 0.25 spaces per dwelling
unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces.

b. Inverted-U style bicycle racks with capacity for a minimum of 10 bicycles
for guests shall be distributed throughout the site near the primary
pedestrian entrance(s) or amenity area.

c. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high
visibility such as near a central amenity area. The repair station shall
include: standard repair tools affixed to the station, a tire gauge and pump
affixed to the base of the station or the ground, and a bicycle repair stand
which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while making adjustments
to the bike.

5. The developer shall provide a system of internal, clearly defined pedestrian
pathways including the following elements, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. Connect all building entrances, exits, and amenity areas, to all public
sidewalks, by a direct route.


Page 184
b. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive-aisles, the crossing shall
visually contrast with parking and drive aisle surfaces.

6. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

7. All right-of-way improvements and access control shall be reviewed, permitted
and approved by ADOT.

8. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

9. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

10. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

12. The developer shall provide a “tot lot” as an amenity in a centrally located open
space, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

13. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the




Page 185
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of February,

2022.



________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager


Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 186
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-47-21-4

That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 26, Township
2 North, Range 2 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian described as
follows;

Commencing at the Northeast Corner of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter
of Section 26.

Thence west along the north line thereof 175 feet;

Thence South 0 degrees 20 minutes West, parallel with the East line of the Northwest
Quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 26. a distance of 183.00 feet to the True
Point of Beginning;

Thence West parallel with the North Line thereof a distance of 152.00 feet to the
southwest corner of the North 183 feet of the East 327 of the Northwest Quarter of the
Northwest quarter of Section 26.

Thence South 45 degrees 18 minutes West a distance of 86.60 feet; Thence South 0
degrees 20 Minutes West a distance of 198.69 feet;

Thence South 45 degrees 18 Minutes West 309.77 feet to a point on the
Northeasterly right of way line of Grand Avenue (said right of way line being 40
feet Northeasterly of the centerline of Grand Avenue as measures at right angles)

Thence South 44 degrees 42 Minutes East along the Northeasterly right of way of
Grand Avenue, a distance of 400.26 feet;

Thence North 45 degrees 18 Minutes East 186.70 feet to a point on the South
line of the North 825.00 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter
of Section 26.

Thence East along said South line 145.81 feet to a point on the West Line
of the East 33.00 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of section
26. Thence North 0 degrees 30 Minutes East along said west line 32.00 feet;

Thence West parallel to the North line of the Northwest quarter of the
Northwest of Section 26, a distance of 142.00 feet to the Southwest corner
of the North 793.00 feet of the East 175.00 feet of the Northwest quarter of the
Northwest quarter of Section 26;

Thence North 0 degrees 20 minutes East parallel to the East line of the
Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 26, a distance of 610.01
feet to the True Point of Beginning;



Page 187
Page 188
Page 189



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-73-21-8 -
Approximately 415 Feet West of the Northwest Corner of 36th Street and
McDowell Road (Ordinance G-6975)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 HGT/WVR (Intermediate Commercial District, Height Waiver), C-2 (Intermediate
Commercial District), P-1 (Parking District - Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited),
and PAD-14 (Planned Area Development District) to R-3 (Multifamily Residence
District) to allow a single-family attached residential development.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 HGT/WVR (2.06 acres), C-2 (0.49 acres), P-1 (1.69 acres), and
PAD-14 (1.63 acres)
Proposed Zoning: R-3
Acreage: 5.87 acres
Proposal: Single-family attached residential

Owner: McDowell Partners I, LLC, et al.
Applicant: McDowell Partners I, LLC
Representative: Ron Harris, Norris Design

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Camelback East Village Planning Committee heard this case on Feb.
1, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 17-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Mar. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Camelback East Village Planning Committee
recommendation with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 415 feet west of the northwest corner of 36th Street and McDowell
Road.
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 3442, 3450, 3452, 3456, 3502, and 3510 E. McDowell Road



Page 190

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 191
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-73-21-8) FROM C-2 HGT/WVR (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, HEIGHT WAIVER), C-2
(INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT), P-1 (PARKING
DISTRICT – PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE PARKING, LIMITED),
AND PAD-14 (PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) TO
R-3 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 5.87-acre site located approximately 415 feet

west of the southwest corner of 36th Street and McDowell Road in a portion of Section

36, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is

hereby changed from 2.06 acres of “C-2 HGT/WVR” (Intermediate Commercial District,

Height Waiver), 0.49 acres of “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial District), 1.69 acres of

“P-1” (Parking District – Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited), and 1.63 acres of

“PAD-14” (Planned Area Development District) to “R-3” (Multifamily Residence District).




Page 192
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the building elevations
date stamped November 15, 2021, with specific regard to variety of materials,
decorative garage doors, and covered entries, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

2. The public sidewalk along McDowell Road shall be detached with a landscape
strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent
Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and planted to the following
standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees that provide a minimum 75 percent
shade at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation maintained at a maximum mature height of
24 inches and achieve 75 percent live coverage.

3. A minimum of 6 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near amenity areas. Bike racks shall be installed
per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall
adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

4. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50-feet of right-of-way and construct the
north side of McDowell Road, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.




Page 193
6. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.

7. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Sky Harbor International Airport to future owners
or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

8. The developer shall submit 7460 Forms to FAA and receive FAA no hazard
determination or mitigations approved by FAA for both temporary and
permanent development prior to final site plan approval.

9. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 6th day of April, 2022.



________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:


Page 194
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 195
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-73-21-8

A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36, BEING A CITY OF
PHOENIX BRASS CAP AT THE INTERSECTION OF EAST MCDOWELL ROAD AND
NORTH 34TH STREET, FROM WHENCE THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER BEARS
NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1324.78
FEET;

THENCE EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 485.14
FEET;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID LINE, NORTH, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE NORTHERN RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF EAST MCDOWELL ROAD
ACCORDING TO A QUIT CLAIM DEED ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF THE
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA RECORDER IN DOCKET 9689, PAGE 872,
COINCIDENT WITH THE WEST LINE OF LOT 6 OF “FARVIEW”, A SUBDIVISION
PLAT, ALSO ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA IN BOOK
14 OF MAPS, PAGE 3, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6, NORTH 00 DEGREES, 14
MINUTES, 45 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 630.91 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6;

THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6, 7, 8 AND 9, NORTH 89
DEGREES, 59 MINUTES, 33 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 424.58 FEET TO
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9 OF SAID FARVIEW SUBDIVISION;

THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT 9, SOUTH 00 DEGREES, 13 MINUTES,
28 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 630.97 FEET TO SAID NORTH RIGHT OF
WAY LINE OF EAST MCDOWELL ROAD;

THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, WEST, A DISTANCE OF 77.66 FEET;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID LINE NORTH 00 DEGREES, 13 MINUTES, 39
SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 238.00 FEET;

THENCE WEST, A DISTANCE OF 99.68 FEET;




Page 196
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES, 13 MINUTES, 49 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
238.00 FEET TO SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF EAST MCDOWELL ROAD;

THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, WEST, A DISTANCE OF 247.02 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.

END OF DESCRIPTION.




Page 197
Page 198



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM MARCH 2, 2022) - Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption -
Rezoning Application Z-20-21-4 - Approximately 1,300 Feet North of the
Northeast Corner of Central Avenue and Indian School Road (Ordinance G-6964)

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-20-21-
4 and rezone the site from UR TOD-1 (Urban Residential, Interim Transit-Oriented
Zoning Overlay District One) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow multifamily
and single-family attached residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: UR TOD-1
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 4.34 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily and single-family attached residential

Owner: Midtown Central Hotel Corporation
Applicant: Cresleigh Homes Arizona, LLC
Representative: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on June 7, 2021,
for information only.
VPC Action: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on Sept. 13,
2021, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote 11-3.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case and continued the item on Oct.
7, Nov. 4, Dec. 2, 2021; and Jan. 6, 2022. The Planning Commission heard this case
on Feb. 3, 2022, and recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, with
an additional and modified stipulation by a vote of 6-2.
CC Action: The City Council continued the request on March 2, 2022 to April 6, 2022 to
allow the item to be posted for a Public Hearing.

Location
Approximately 1,300 feet north of the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Indian
School Road


Page 199

Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 4325 N. Central Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 200
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(Z-20-21-4) FROM UR TOD-1 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL, INTERIM
TRANSIT-ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT ONE) TO
PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 4.34-acre site located approximately 1,300

feet north of the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Indian School Road, in a

portion of Section 20, Township 2 North and Range 3 East, as described more

specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “UR TOD-1” (Urban Residential,

Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One) to “PUD” (Planned Unit

Development).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,


Page 201
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. An updated Development Narrative for Uptown Residential Community PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval
of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped July 12, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Add a row titled “Pedestrian connections to Central Avenue” with the
following development standard: “Two pedestrian connections to the
Central Avenue sidewalk from a system of interior pedestrian pathways.
All units with a required stoop frontage type shall be connected to Central
Avenue by a direct pedestrian pathway. The pedestrian connections to the
public sidewalk shall be a minimum 5 feet wide.”

b. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Add a row titled “Pedestrian system standards” with the following:
 “Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided
to connect building entrances, public sidewalks, and amenity areas,
using the most direct route for pedestrians.”

c. Page 14, 4. Shade. Replace with the following language and formatting:
 75 percent minimum shade shall be provided on public sidewalk
along Central Avenue.
 75 percent minimum shade shall be provided on private walkways
through a combination of vegetative and architectural shade but
architectural shade shall not comprise more than 30 percent of the
total shade.
 All interior pedestrian pathways shall be shaded to a minimum of 75
percent

d. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Add a row titled “Pedestrian system standards” with the following:
“Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to
connect building entrances, public sidewalks, and amenity areas, using
the most direct route for pedestrians.”

e. Page 15, 6. Walls and Fences, Replace the first sentence with the
following “Walls will be in accordance with the wall exhibits herein”

f. Page 15, PUD Wall & Fence Design Standards Table, Replace the
development standards for all perimeters adjacent to private parcels
located near the northwest and northeast corners of the PUD from “6’
minimum; 8’ maximum” to “maximum height of 6 feet.”


Page 202
g. Page 12, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Replace the development standards language for “WU Frontage Types”
with the following: “All units adjacent to Central Avenue shall comply with
the requirements of Section 1305, Table 1305.1. For stoop. Units 1
through 14, and 38 to 43, as depicted on the illustrative landscape plan
date stamped February 1, 2022 shall comply with the requirements of
Section 1305, Table 1305.1. For stoop with the frontage oriented to the
south. Minimum width: 60% of building façade”

h. Page 11, PUD Development Standards Table (Single-Family Attached),
Update “Maximum Projection by Porches, Patios, Balconies or port-
cocheres into required Perimeter setbacks” to add “Stoops.”

i. Page 15, 7. Central Avenue Frontage, Replace “Porch” With “Stoop.”

j. Page 8. B. Land Use Plan. Replace all descriptions of “Porch” Frontage
Types with “Stoop.”

k. Pages 9-10, 17, 22, 24, 25, and 30 - 34. Update the figures and exhibits
contained in the narrative to be consistent with the illustrative landscape
plan date stamped February 1, 2022 and add the architectural rendering
figures date stamped February 1, 2022, to reflect the change from “porch”
to “stoop” frontages and the added pedestrian pathway along the south
property line.

l. Page 26, Section E.2. Architectural Design. Add the following to the
beginning of the list and renumber the remaining entries: “The
development shall be in general conformance with the architectural
renderings with specific regard to parapet design, four-sided architecture,
and multiple colors and materials on each building face, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.”

m. Page 3, Table of Contents. Update the table of contents to include the
architectural renderings and renumber pages accordingly.

2. The developer shall dedicate a 12-foot Image Enhancement Easement along the
east side of Central Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. The developer shall provide improvements on Central Avenue in compliance with
the Central Avenue Image Enhancement guidelines, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. The developer shall dedicate a public access easement along the northern site
boundary to provide legal access to APN 155-25-001L, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.



Page 203
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

6. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.

7. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

8. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

10. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

12. A maximum one point of ingress/egress shall be allowed onto Central Avenue,
not including the shared easement located along the north boundary of the
subject site. The width of the vehicular ingress/egress shall be no greater than 30
feet, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

13. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.




Page 204
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,

2022.


________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager


Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 205
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-20-21-4

THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH,
RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 FROM
WHICH THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER BEARS NORTH 0°15'41” EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 2636.90 FEET;

THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER NORTH
0°15'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1352.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 0°15'41" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE, SOUTH 89°44'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF
250.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2009-0913462, MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDS;

THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, NORTH 0°15'41" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF AND TO A
POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT NUMBER NOD-15422 MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS;

THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 89°44'19" EAST A DISTANCE OF
200.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF
LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2009-0913462, MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDS;

THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 0°15'41" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;

THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 89°44'19" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL AND
TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 1996-0877263 MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDS;

THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 0°15'41" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE NORTH 89°44'19" WEST A DISTANCE OF
550.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 187500 SQUARE FEET OR 4.3044 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.


Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-MV-1-21-5 - Area Generally Bounded
By 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue (Resolution
22010)

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. This is a companion case to Z-19-G-00-5 and must be heard first, followed
by Z-19-G-00-5.

Summary
Application: GPA-MV-1-21-5
Current Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial)
Proposed Designation: Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (228.80 acres),
Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre (48.13 acres), Residential 10 to 15 dwelling
units per acre (49.82 acres)
Acreage: 326.75 acres
Proposed Use: To allow residential densities less than 20 dwelling units per acre

Owner: Algodon AG Revocable Land Trust
Applicant: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Representative: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Info: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on July 14, 2021
for information only.
VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on Jan. 12,
2022 and recommended denial, by a vote of 5-4.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Feb. 3, 2022 and continued
the case to Mar. 3, 2022, by a vote of 8-0. The Planning Commission heard this case
on Mar. 3, 2022 and recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, by a
vote of 7-0.

Location
Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell


Page 210

Avenue.
Council District: 5
Parcel Addresses: 3540, 3750, 3960 N. 93rd Ave.; 3455 N. 97th Ave.; 3301, 3701 N.
99th Ave.; and 9225, 9375, 9425, 9701 W. Indian School Road.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 211
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882

APPLICATION NO: GPA-MV-1-21-5 ACRES: 325.73 +/- REVISION DATE:

VILLAGE: Maryvale COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 3/3/2022 3/21/2022

APPLICANT: Stephen W. Anderson 3/25/2022

EXISTING:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) ( 325.73 +/- Acres)


INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Proposed Change Area
Residential 1 to 2 du/ac
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Commercial
Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial)
Transportation


99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD

PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 226.99 +/- Acres)
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac ( 48.13 +/- Acres)
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac ( 50.61 +/- Acres) INDIAN SCHOOL RD



Proposed Change Area 101
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac



99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882

APPLICATION NO: GPA-MV-1-21-5_BW ACRES: 325.73 +/- REVISION DATE:

VILLAGE: Maryvale COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 3/3/2022 3/21/2022

APPLICANT: Stephen W. Anderson 3/25/2022

EXISTING:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) ( 325.73 +/- Acres)


INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Proposed Change Area
Residential 1 to 2 du/acre
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Residential 5 to 10 du/acre
Commercial
Mixed Use (Commericial/Industrial)
Transportation


99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD

PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 226.99 +/- Acres)
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac ( 48.13 +/- Acres)
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac ( 50.61 +/- Acres) INDIAN SCHOOL RD



Proposed Change Area 101
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Residential 5 to 10 du/acre
Residential 10 to 15 du/acre



99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION




RESOLUTION _____

A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
2015 GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION
GPA-MV-1-21-5, CHANGING THE LAND USE
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN.
____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan which was adopted by

Resolution No. 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-MV-1-21-5. The 326.75 -

acre site located in an area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue,

Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue is designated 228.80 acres of Residential 3.5 to 5

dwelling units per acre, 48.13 acres of Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre, and

49.82 acres of Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre.

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as

shown below:




Page 212
Need updated map. Addendum B is pending.



PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 6th day of April, 2022.


________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:

________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager





Page 213
Attachment B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS

January 7, 2022

Application: GPA-MV-1-21-5

Owner: Algodon AG Revocable Land Trust

Applicant/Representative: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham PLC

Location: Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th
Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue

Acreage: 349.06 acres

Current Plan Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) (349.06 acres)

Requested Plan Designation: Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (228.70
acres), Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre
(48.13 acres), Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units
per acre (72.23 acres)


Reason for Requested Change: Map amendment allow residential densities less
than 20 dwelling units per acre

Village Planning Committee Date: Maryvale – January 12, 2022

Staff Recommendation: Approval


FINDINGS:

1) The companion rezoning case (Z-19-G-00-5), a major amendment to the
Algodón Center PUD PCD, proposes residential densities less than 20 dwelling
units per acre. The proposal exceeds 10 acres and is not consistent with the
existing General Plan Land Use Map designation. Therefore, a General Plan
amendment is required to amend the Land Use Map designation.




Page 214
Staff Analysis
GPA-MV-1-21-5

2) The proposed land use designations are compatible with the surrounding land
use pattern in the area.

3) The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designations and design standards in
the companion PUD will help ensure high-quality residential development
compatible with surrounding uses.


BACKGROUND

The Algodón Center PUD PCD is generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue,
Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue. The site was used as agricultural land and is now
largely vacant. The proposed request is to modify the General Plan Land Use
designations for part of the PUD PCD area west of the Loop 101 Freeway from Indian
School Road to Thomas Road and two parcels on the east side of freeway as shown in
the map below. This request would amend the existing General Plan Land Use Map
designation from Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) to Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre for 228.70 acres, Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre for 48.13
acres, and Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre for 72.23 acres. Rezoning Case
Z-19-G-00-5, a major amendment to the Algodón Center PUD PCD proposes residential
densities less than 20 dwelling units per acre.

SURROUNDING LAND USES

The current General Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Mixed Use
(Commercial / Industrial). The subject site is currently vacant and bifurcating the subject
site is the Loop 101 Freeway. North of Indian School Road are Mixed Use (Commercial
/ Industrial), Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre, and Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre designations with self-service storage, gas station and office uses. East
of 91st Avenue are commercial and educational uses and single-family residences with
Commercial, Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Residential 5 to 10
dwelling units per acre designations. South of Thomas Road is designated as
Commercial with a hospital and medical office uses in addition to vacant land. To west
of 99th Avenue is vacant land within the City of Avondale.




Page 215
Staff Analysis
GPA-MV-1-21-5




Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department

This request is to designate approximately half of the Algodón Center PUD area (349.06
acres) from Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) to Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre for 228.70 acres, Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre for 48.13 acres,
and Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre for 72.23 acres to allow a single-family
detached, single-family attached and multifamily residential uses at densities less than
20 dwelling units per acre.




Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department


Page 216
Staff Analysis
GPA-MV-1-21-5


RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE

• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels
of increased intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.

The proposal will provide a reasonable level of increased intensity that is
compatible with the neighboring uses and will complement the land use pattern in
the area. The requested land use designations provide for additional housing
and retail choices for Maryvale residents.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE

• CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Create new
development or redevelopment that is sensitive to the scale and character
of the surrounding neighborhoods and incorporates adequate development
standards to prevent negative impact(s) on the residential properties.

The proposal via accompanying rezoning case Z-19-G-00-5, will be sensitive in
scale and character to the surrounding residential area and incorporates
development standards to prevent negative impacts to the existing residential
neighborhood.

• CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS; CLEAN
NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Facilitate the acquisition of
vacant, underutilized and blighted parcels for appropriate redevelopment,
compatible with the adjacent neighborhood character and adopted area
plans.

The proposal will allow future development of several underutilized parcels for a
mixture of housing types that is compatible with the adjacent neighborhood
character.

• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote and encourage
compatible development and redevelopment with a mix of housing types in
neighborhoods close to employment centers, commercial areas, and where
transit or transportation alternatives exist.

The proposal will provide additional housing choices for area residents within the
Agua Fria Major Employment Center and retains over 300 acres of the Algodón
PUD PCD designated as Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial).




Page 217
Staff Analysis
GPA-MV-1-21-5


CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-MV-1-21-5. Approval of this General Plan
Amendment will further the goals of the General Plan and will support the development
of underutilized sites with uses that will provide additional opportunities for residential
development in Maryvale.

Writer
Sarah Stockham
January 7, 2022

Team Leader
Samantha Keating

Exhibits
Sketch Map (2 pages)




Page 218
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-MV-1-21-5 ACRES: 349.06 +/-
VILLAGE: Maryvale COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5
APPLICANT: Stephen W. Anderson
EXISTING:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) ( 349.06 +/- Acres)


IND IAN SCHOOL RD
Proposed Change Area
Residential 1 to 2 du/ac
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
w
v
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Commercial
Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial)
Transportation


99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD

PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 228.70 +/- Acres)
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac ( 48.13 +/- Acres)
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac ( 72.23 +/- Acres) IND IAN SCHOOL RD



Proposed Change Area
w
v
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac



99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD

Page 219
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-MV-1-21-5_BW ACRES: 349.06 +/-
VILLAGE: Maryvale COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5
APPLICANT: Stephen W. Anderson
EXISTING:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) ( 349.06 +/- Acres)


IND IAN SCHOOL RD
Proposed Change Area
Residential 1 to 2 du/acre
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
w
v
Residential 5 to 10 du/acre
Commercial
Mixed Use (Commericial/Industrial)
Transportation


99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD

PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 228.70 +/- Acres)
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac ( 48.13 +/- Acres)
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac ( 72.23 +/- Acres) IND IAN SCHOOL RD



Proposed Change Area
w
v
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Residential 5 to 10 du/acre
Residential 10 to 15 du/acre



99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD

Page 220
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-MV-1-21-5
INFORMATION ONLY

Date of VPC Meeting July 14, 2021
Request From Amend the General Plan Land Use Map Designation
from Mixed Use (Commercial/Industrial) to Residential
3.5 to 5, Residential 5 to 10, and Residential 10 to 15
dwelling units per acre
Proposed Use To allow residential densities less than 20 dwelling
units per acre
Location An area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th
Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue


VPC DISCUSSION:

Item Nos. 7 (GPA-MV-1-21-5) and 8 (Z-19-G-00-5) are companion cases and were
heard together.

Stephen Anderson, representing the applicant with Gammage & Burnham, reviewed
the project boundaries and proposed changes to the General Plan Land Use Map,
Housing Phoenix Plan goals, proposed projects within the PUD boundaries showing
aerial images and site plans, projected rent and sale prices, mortgage and rent
assistance programs by the proposed builders, and discussed a potential timeline for
recommendation and their completed community outreach to date.

Ken DuBose shared surprise at the request by the property owner (John F. Long),
stating that the prices were not affordable, a one-bedroom for rent for $1400 is not
affordable for residents in the area and while the market is generating a lot of housing,
none of it is very affordable. Mr. DuBose concluded that he was surprised John F. Long
did not have any affordable housing incorporated with this request.

Mike Weber shared that it was a shame that the medical campus is not going into the
PUD boundaries, the proposal should still have space for retail, there is still an issue
with water out in the area and if the applicant could help involve the City Council to get
the light rail to extend near the subject site. Mr. Anderson responded that the City is
doing water extensions throughout the developed part of the city, replacing farming with
housing substantially reduces water consumption and he does not know what Valley
Metro plans to do after the light rail gets extended on the I-10 freeway, but there might
be a ballot measure (Prop. 500) which would add a 25-cent sales tax for transit.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 221
Sandra Oviedo shared that there are many high-density living spaces in the area but
office space is important so that people in the Village can commute closer to where they
live, and that is important for people to live, work, shop and play at the subject site.

Jeff O’Toole stated that Algodón is the last large employment corridor in west Phoenix,
it was shocking that the most creative option for this site is to put more houses on it, a
few years ago the PUD boundary was amended to add houses and that was supposed
to be the last request for housing, and that it is also a failure of the Community and
Economic Development Department, and that he would like to see a proposal that is
more mixed-use. Mr. Anderson replied that the site has been out there for 20 years,
they have asked the City to work with the property owner to add more commercial uses,
this site is not important to CED and showed the committee over economic
development sites within the city and reviewed previous proposals for economic
development on the site and why those deals did not come to fruition.

Sandra Oviedo stated that while she did not know there were plans to place a water
park on the site at one point in time, it would be beneficial to have jobs and some sort of
attraction on the site and that Maryvale residents have to go outside of the area to work,
they should be able to work in Maryvale too.

Chair Gene Derie shared that having been on the committee for 13 years, he has
heard discussions of the various commercial proposals for the site such as Ikea or the
stadium, and that while he is not happy with the Community and Economic
Development Department he is not a fan of this proposal for housing and that there has
been many new housing developments approved in the area which would also
contribute to the Housing Phoenix Plan goal, and he was sorry to see the original dream
of John F. Long to have an economic corridor on the site change. Mr. Anderson replied
that is was pure accident that the Tohono O’odham acquired the land north of the
stadium for the casino, and that the City of Goodyear used a GPLET proposal for the
medical office park and cancer treatment center.

Ken DuBose shared that while the City needs more economic development tools, there
are many housing developments being approved, Maryvale is being over-run with all the
new housing developments and isn’t in the discussion for the light rail extension.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 222
Attachment D




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-MV-1-21-5



Date of VPC Meeting January 12, 2022
Request From Amend the General Plan Land Use Map Designation
from Mixed Use (Commercial/Industrial) to Residential
3.5 to 5, Residential 5 to 10, and Residential 10 to 15
dwelling units per acre
Proposed Use To allow residential densities less than 20 dwelling
units per acre
Location An area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th
Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue
VPC Recommendation Denial
VPC Vote 5-4


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Items 6 (GPA-MV-1-21-5) and 7 (Z-19-G-00-5) are companion cases and were heard
together.

Sarah Stockham, staff, provided an overview of the requests, noting the location and
the history of the site. Ms. Stockham displayed a map of the current and proposed
General Plan Land Use Map designations, and staff’s findings. Ms. Stockham displayed
an aerial map, a conceptual site plan and elevations, and reviewed the surrounding land
uses, the proposal, staff’s recommendation, and stipulations.

Stephen Anderson, representing the applicant with Gammage & Burnham, reviewed
the proposed developments within the Algodón Center PUD area sharing that by 2023
the proposal will add around 4,000 jobs and 2,400 housing units, they had an extensive
mailing list and hosted two neighborhood meetings, and the proposed PUD major
amendment has gone through a thorough review with city staff. Mr. Anderson reviewed
the proposed mix of housing types with estimated pricing, detailed the five-acre central
amenity area in the development and shared that they have been asked to construct
bicycle lanes along Indian School Road, they will be constructing a sewer lift station,
and that converting agricultural land to housing uses less water. Mr. Anderson added
that the Pendergast School District is excited for the proposal they will construct 93rd
Avenue (which runs along the south side of the school), the proposal is below the
density limits for their comparative zoning districts, they are providing three times the
amount of open space than what would be required in the Zoning Ordinance, and their
PUD standards require detached sidewalks, enhanced shading standard and design
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 223
review, in addition to providing 50% shade for the bus stops and bus infrastructure they
are required to provide in stipulation Nos. 3 through 5. Mr. Anderson concluded that this
proposal would add around 2,500 housing units in a wide variety of housing types, and
the proposal preserves approximately 200 acres for commercial development which will
add to the job opportunities in the area.

Questions from the Committee:
Saundra Cole asked if the jobs will be high-paying or low-paying. Mr. Anderson replied
that he thinks they will be high paying jobs, there is a critical labor shortage and there
are a lot of budding businesses in the area and there is data showing wage pressure
which is causing higher wages and the entry-level minimum wage is also increasing.

Sandra Oviedo asked what type of corporate buildings would be constructed in the
PUD area. Mr. Anderson replied that he does not know, LGE is under contract for 90
days to purchase land in the PUD area to construct commercial buildings and showed
LGE’s website and examples of their past projects. Ms. Oviedo shared that is nice to
see the corporate building examples and shared a desire to see more white-collar jobs
in the area rather than big-box retail.

Mike Weber shared that it is nice to see some areas devoted to businesses going into
the PUD area and that it is not all housing, and that along the freeway the PUD allows
for higher height limits. Mr. Anderson replied that yes, the PUD has always allowed high
height limits and they are not proposing to change that, and that the applicant did
provide a noise study which calls for over-height walls along the freeway when adjacent
to residential homes.

Jeff O’Toole thanked John F. Long for all the investment in Maryvale, shared that he
liked the mix of housing types which brings in a diversity of residents, recognized that
there is a housing crisis but there is also an employment crisis, which leads to longer
commutes and increased traffic, and that while the proposal shows very nice housing
with great open space, this is the last area to make an employment center in the West
Valley, and it is hard to argue that housing is the highest and best use for this area
along the freeway. Mr. O’Toole added that it is a failure of the Community and
Economic Development Department to make the employment center a reality, the
renderings of the commercial buildings are nice but not guaranteed, in 2018 John F.
Long promised that they would not come back to amend the PUD again to allow any
more housing and that this proposal is too much housing, they already have around
2,800 units approved in the area.

Joe Barba asked the applicant to provide some statistics on jobs created and the
economic impact of this proposal. Mr. Anderson replied that he can send that to staff.

Sandra Oviedo agreed with committee member O’Toole’s comments, shared that the
area should be a self-sufficient community where people can live, work and play in the
same area, asked the applicant to elaborate on the bike lanes and if they would
consider a park-and-ride at this site. Mr. Anderson replied that the light rail is not
proposed to extend near this area, they will be installing painted bike lanes along the
arterial streets, they area stipulated to install bus bays and bus stops which will be
shaded to 50%, there is a lot of multimodal access on the site, the Public Transit
Department did not ask for a park-and-ride at this location, and they will be adding an
additional vehicular lane along Indian School Road in addition to the painted bike lanes,
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 224
which are not curb or parking separated. Ms. Oviedo asked how crossing will happen
along the major streets and what pedestrian amenities will be provided. Mr. Anderson
replied that they are required to install five traffic signals, which is where the crossings
will occur.

Jeff O’Toole asked if the proposed housing development will be gated and how far
north does the third lane along 99th Avenue extend to. Mr. Anderson replied that yes,
the community will be gated, the private streets and amenity areas will be maintained by
the HOA, the school buses will have access through the gates, and that the travel lane
will extend to Campbell Avenue which is the northern border of the subject site, and that
there is a SRP well at 99th Avenue and Campbell Avenue and a SRP ditch, the City of
Avondale is in charge of the west side of the street and the improvements will be shifted
east. Mr. O’Toole added that going down to two lanes along 99th Avenue in conjunction
with not having a dedicated right-turn lane onto Camelback Road creates significant
traffic congestion concerns. Mr. Anderson replied that they are only required to improve
the street along the subject site which ends at Campbell Avenue, but the other concerns
can be shared with the Street Transportation Department.

Zeke Valenzuela asked how long it would be until the subject site reached 60%-70%
completion. Mr. Anderson replied that full build out would be around a decade, the
commercial buildings would develop faster and that 60%-70% completion might be
within five years.

Sandra Oviedo shared that it would be nice to see a self-sufficient community where
people play, shop and live in the area, and that the crossings can be dangerous at the
surrounding intersections.

Chair Gene Derie shared that the Algodón Center PUD PCD has been around for 20
years, was meant to be a major employment and economic center, there are roughly
2,600 housing units entitled or being built in the surrounding area, half of which are on
the west side of 99th Avenue between Indian School Road and Thomas Road and
asked what the plan was for the parcel at the northwest corner of 99th Avenue and
Indian School Road. Tim Wright, with John F. Long Properties replied that the site in
Avondale was sold to Fulton homes. Chair Gene Derie continued that there are several
housing developments proposed in the area, citing 99th Avenue and Camelback Road
by the charter school (267 units), 99th Avenue and Indian School Road (228 units),
111th Avenue and Camelback Road (194 units), east of Loop 101 near 95th Avenue
and Indian School Road (501 units) and around 1,300 units in Avondale near 104th
Avenue and Indian School Road. Chair Gene Derie added that he liked what is
proposed on the east side of the freeway, but not what is proposed west of the freeway,
concluding that the PUD was supposed to be the economic engine of Maryvale.

Sandra Oviedo asked the applicant to clarify what the vocational campus is as depicted
in the PUD area. Mr. Anderson replied that the West MEC campus is around 30-acres,
it stands for the Western Maricopa Education Center, it provides vocation education in
many fields such as healthcare, welding, aviation maintenance. Ms. Oviedo responded
that the campus is a great addition, there is a need for more places like that in addition
to access to healthy food.

Joe Barba asked if the Chair’s concerns with the proposal was that it was too much
housing. Chair Gene Derie replied affirmatively, sharing that there are many housing
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 225
units planned for the area. Joe Barba replied that there are many people moving to
Phoenix, and this is an opportunity to bring them to Maryvale, the population is going to
increase significantly by 2030, they shouldn’t paint too much housing as a bad thing,
and that there is a huge need for housing.

Sandra Oviedo shared that there should be both housing and commercial uses in the
community where people can work, live and play in the same area.

Joe Barba shared that he is not disagreeing with committee member Oviedo, and that
the people who are moving to the area are going into areas like Buckeye and then must
commute to their jobs, which will contribute to congestion.

Ken DuBose shared that he has lived in the area for 35 years, they are surrounded by
a residential area, traffic is inevitable with growth, it is disappointing to see the City of
Phoenix which has an affordable housing plan to not do some affordable housing at this
site, this is the last largest land mass in Maryvale and the committee should be careful
with this request, and that he wants to see more affordable housing and senior housing
in the Village. Mr. Dubose added that the income needed for a one-bedroom in this
proposal is $56,000, a schoolteacher does not make that amount, which confirms the
need for affordable housing. Mr. DuBose asked the applicant to explain how they came
up with the income needed for the housing units in the proposal. Mr. Anderson replied
that the income calculations came from mortgage financing for the homes, and they
have talked to the Housing Department about the project site potentially being within an
employee-assisted program where employers help get their employees housing, and
that the Housing Department does not have funds for that sort of program, but they
know that the developer is interested in being involved if that program was ever created.

Jeff O’Toole shared that he agreed with committee member Barba’s comments and
there is a desire to draw talent to the area, but if nothing but housing is built on land
available for commercial uses, they will miss the opportunity to have more places for
people to work in the Village and to have more retail spaces. Mr. O’Toole concluded
that he might be more amenable to the proposal if the housing to commercial land use
ratio was closer to 50/50. Mr. Anderson replied that the proposal is 58% residential and
42% commercial, and asked Mr. David Sellers with LGE Design Group to share about
their plans for the commercial areas of the PUD. David Sellers, with LGE Design
Group, shared that the two parcels within the PUD are incredible pieces of land, having
housing nearby their planned commercial properties is a benefit to the employers, the
buildings will be very nice and will draw in high-paying jobs, and that while they haven’t
closed on the property yet they have the capital for the projects, they are a vertically-
integrated, they like the freeway visibility and that commercial tenants will see housing
nearby as an asset.

Sandra Oviedo asked if there are any long-term projects for when the community ages.
Mr. Anderson replied they do not have any age-restricted projects proposed on the site,
and that the area could accommodate the Next Gen style of development that Lennar
offers.

Chair Gene Derie commented that John F. Long’s dream for the Algodón Center PUD
PCD was to have an employment center in Maryvale because they had already built
enough housing, churches and schools in the Village.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 226
Public Comment:
None.

Item No. 6 GPA-MV-1-21-5
Motion:
Joe Barba motioned to recommended approval of GPA-MV-1-21-5 per the staff
recommendation. Zeke Valenzuela seconded the motion.

Discussion:
Sandra Oviedo commented that she would like to see safe protected bike lanes within
the subject site.

Vote:
4-5, Motion to approve fails, with Committee Members Barba, Cole, Oviedo, and
Valenzuela in favor and committee members Battle, DuBose, O’Toole, Weber, and
Derie opposed.

Motion:
Jeff O’Toole motioned to recommended denial of GPA-MV-1-21-5. Mike Weber
seconded the motion.

Vote:
5-4, Motion to deny passes, with Committee Members Battle, DuBose, O’Toole, Weber,
and Derie in favor and committee members Barba, Cole, Oviedo, and Valenzuela
opposed.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 227
Attachment E


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 3, 2022

ITEM NO: 2
DISTRICT NO.: 5
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-MV-1-21-5
Location: Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas Road to
Campbell Avenue
From: Mixed Use (Commercial/Industrial)
To: Residential 10 to15 dwelling units per acre, Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 349.06
Proposal: Map amendment to allow residential densities less than 20 dwelling units
per acre.
Applicant: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Owner: Algodon AG Revocable Land Trust
Representative: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Maryvale 7/14/2021 Information only.
Maryvale 1/12/2022 Denial. Vote: 5-4

Planning Commission Recommendation: Continued to March 3, 2022 Planning Commission
hearing, without fee.

Motion Discussion: To the allow the applicant to have additional time to make updates to the
plan.

Motion details: Commissioner McCabe made a MOTION to continue GPA-MV-1-21-5 to the
March 3, 2022 Planning Commission hearing, without fee.

Maker: McCabe
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 8-0
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.






Page 228
Attachment F




ADDENDUM A
GPA-MV-1-21-5
STAFF ANALYSIS

March 3, 2022

Application: GPA-MV-1-21-5

Owner: Algodon AG Revocable Land Trust

Applicant/Representative: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham PLC

Location: Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th
Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue

Acreage: 326.75 acres

Current Plan Designation: Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) (326.75 acres)

Requested Plan Designation: Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (228.80
acres), Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre
(48.13 acres), Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units
per acre (49.82 acres)


Reason for Requested Change: Map amendment allow residential densities less
than 20 dwelling units per acre

Village Planning Committee Date: Maryvale – January 12, 2022

Staff Recommendation: Approval


SUMMARY:
The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this request on January 12, 2022, and
recommended denial by a 5-4 vote. The Planning Commission voted unanimously (8-0)
on February 3, 2022, to continue this case to the March 3, 2022 hearing to allow the
applicant additional time to make changes to the proposal.

The applicant proposes to modify their request to allow for approximately 22 acres of
the subject site to remain designated as Mixed-Use (Commercial/Industrial) on the
General Plan Land Use Map. The previous request was for 72.23 acres of Residential




Page 229
Addendum A to the Staff Analysis GPA-MV-1-21-5
March 3, 2022

10 to 15 dwelling units per acres, along with the other residential designations
requested. The amended request is reduced to propose changing 49.82 acres of Mixed
Use (Commercial / Industrial) to Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acres. Updated
sketch maps are attached to reflect this change. Also attached is one letter of support
received since the Village Planning Committee date.

PREVIOUS REQUEST:




AMENDED REQUEST:




Page 230
Addendum A to the Staff Analysis GPA-MV-1-21-5
March 3, 2022

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends approval of GPA-MV-1-21-5 per Addendum A.

Exhibits
Sketch Map (2 pages)
Correspondence




Page 231
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882

APPLICATION NO: GPA-MV-1-21-5 ACRES: 326.75 +/- REVISION DATE:

VILLAGE: Maryvale COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 3/3/2022
APPLICANT: Stephen W. Anderson
EXISTING:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) ( 326.75 +/- Acres)


INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Proposed Change Area
Residential 1 to 2 du/ac
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Commercial
Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial)
Transportation


99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD

PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 228.80 +/- Acres)
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac ( 48.13 +/- Acres)
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac ( 49.82 +/- Acres) INDIAN SCHOOL RD



Proposed Change Area 101
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac



99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD

Page 232
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 200 W WASHINGTON ST PHOENIX, AZ 85003 (602) 262-6882

APPLICATION NO: GPA-MV-1-21-5 ACRES: 326.75 +/- REVISION DATE:

VILLAGE: Maryvale COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 3/3/2022
APPLICANT: Stephen W. Anderson
EXISTING:
Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) ( 326.75 +/- Acres)


INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Proposed Change Area
Residential 1 to 2 du/acre
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Residential 5 to 10 du/acre
Commercial
Mixed Use (Commericial/Industrial)
Transportation


99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD

PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 228.80 +/- Acres)
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac ( 48.13 +/- Acres)
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac ( 49.82 +/- Acres) INDIAN SCHOOL RD



Proposed Change Area 101
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Residential 5 to 10 du/acre
Residential 10 to 15 du/acre



99TH AVE

91ST AVE




THOMAS RD

Page 233
Date: February 2, 2022

Tim Wright
John F. Long Properties
1118 E. Missouri Ave, Suite A
Phoenix, AZ 85014

Re: Algodon Center PUD


Banner Health has been a supporter of growth in the greater Phoenix area for as long as we
have been caring for the community. The proposed modifications proposed by John F. Long
in conjunction with efforts by Gammage & Burnham for the Algodon Center will bring
residential and commercial growth to the west valley. We support the proposed changes
described in the Major Amendment & Minor General Amendment by John F. Long. Please
feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns.


Sincerely,


Aaron Zeligman
Sr. Project Executive
Aaron.Zeligman@bannerhealth.com
(602) 989-4713




Page 234
Attachment G


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 3, 2022

ITEM NO: 3
DISTRICT NO.: 5
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-MV-1-21-5 (Companion Case Z-19-G-00-5)
Location: Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas Road to
Campbell Avenue
From: Mixed Use (Commercial/Industrial)
To: Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre, Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 349.06
Proposal: Minor General Plan Map amendment to allow residential densities less
than 20 dwelling units per acre.
Applicant: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Owner: Algodon AG Revocable Land Trust
Representative: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum A Staff Analysis Report.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Maryvale 7/14/2021 Information only.
Maryvale 1/12/2022 Denial. Vote: 5-4.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum A Staff Analysis Report.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Gaynor made a MOTION to approve GPA-MV-1-21-5, per
Addendum A of the Staff Analysis Report.

Maker: Gaynor
Second: McCabe
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Gorraiz
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The companion rezoning case (Z-19-G-00-5), a major amendment to the
Algodón Center PUD PCD, proposes residential densities less than 20 dwelling
units per acre. The proposal exceeds 10 acres and is not consistent with the
existing General Plan Land Use Map designation. Therefore, a General Plan
amendment is required to amend the Land Use Map designation.

2. The proposed land use designations are compatible with the surrounding land
use pattern in the area.

3. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designations and design standards in

Page 235
the companion PUD will help ensure high-quality residential development
compatible with surrounding uses.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 236



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendment and Public Hearing - Rezoning Application Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodon
Center PUD) - Area Generally Bounded By 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas
Road to Campbell Avenue (Ordinance G-6980)

Request to hold a public hearing and to approve Rezoning Application Z-19-G-00-5
and rezone the site from PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development, Planned Community
District) to PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development, Planned Community District) for a
major amendment to the Algodon Center PUD PCD to allow single-family and
multifamily residential. This is a companion case and must be heard following GPA-MV
-1-21-5.

Summary
Current Zoning: PUD PCD
Proposed Zoning: PUD PCD
Acreage: 672.92 acres
Proposed Use: Major amendment to the Algodon Center PUD to allow single-family
and multifamily residential.

Owner: John F. Long Properties, LLLP, et al.
Applicant: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Representative: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on July 14, 2021,
for information only.
VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on Jan. 12,
2022, and recommended denial, by a vote of 6-3.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Feb. 3, 2022, and continued
the case to Mar. 3, 2022, by a vote of 8-0. The Planning Commission heard this case
on Mar. 3, 2022, and recommended approval, per the Addendum B Staff Report, by a
vote of 6-1.

Location
Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell


Page 237

Avenue.
Council District: 5
Parcel Addresses: 3000, 3100 N. 91st Ave.; 3000, 3010, 3170, 3540, 3750, 3960 N.
93rd Ave.; 2917 N. 94th Ave.; 3455, 4421 N. 97th Ave.; 3301, 3701, 4411 N. 99th Ave.;
9225, 9375, 9425, 9701, 9840 W. Indian School Road; 3020, 3223, 3248 N. Algodon
Way; and 9250, 9304, 9356, 9394, 9410, 9440 W. Thomas Road.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 238
ATTACHMENT A
Algodón Center PUD, Planned Community District

Z-19-G-00-5

 UPDATE STIPS AFTER ADDENDUM C
Planning Commission Approved Stipulations from February 3, 2022:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Algodón Centre PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this
request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped December 29, 2021, as modified by the
following stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the date information on the cover page to add the
following:


B. PAGE 9, TABLE 1, RESIDENTIAL USE, BULLET POINT 2: AMEND THE
SENTENCE TO READ “A MAXIMUM OF 326.75 GROSS ACRES OF
THE TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA OF THE PUD SHALL BE USED FOR
RESIDENTIAL USES OF LESS THAN 20 DU/AC.”

b. c. Page 15, Table 3A, Streetscape Section, Item 1: Rename section to
“Landscape Setback” and delete “measured from back of curb” from first
sentence.

c. d. Page 15, Table 3A, Low Density Residential Sidewalks Section: Update
the first sentence to read “For any residential parcel where density is less
than 20 dwelling units per gross acres, sidewalks shall be a minimum of
five feet wide, and shall be separated from the curb per the requirements
of the Street Classification Map with a minimum five foot wide landscape
strip.

d. e. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 1: Rename section to
“Landscape Setback”, delete “measured from back of curb” from first
sentence AND ADD “PERIMETER” BEFORE “PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
STREET FRONTAGES”.

e. f. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 2, Bullet Point 1: Add “and
utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

f. g. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 2, Bullet Point 2: Add “and
utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.




Page 239
g. h. Page 18, Table 3B, Perimeter Adjacent to Loop 101 Section, Item 2,
Bullet Point 1: Add “and utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

h. i. Page 18, Table 3B, Perimeter Adjacent to Loop 101 Section, Item 2,
Bullet Point 2: Add “and utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

2. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and ensure bus stop pad(s) at the
following locations, with final siting to be approved by the Public Transit
Department:

a. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Earl Drive alignment.

b. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Osborn Road alignment.

c. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Clarendon Avenue alignment.

d. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Glenrosa Avenue alignment.

e. Southbound 91st Avenue south of Osborn Road alignment.

f. Southbound 91st Avenue south of Cheery Lynn Road alignment.

g. Westbound Thomas Road at approximately 9700 West Thomas Road.

3. Bus stop pads shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pad shall be spaced from the
intersection according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall be
placed to provide 50% shade coverage to bus stop pad at full maturity.

4. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and ensure bus bay with bus stop pad
at the following locations, final siting to be approved by the Public Transit
Department:

a. Northbound 99th Avenue north of Thomas Road.

b. Northbound 99th Avenue north of Indian School Road.

5. Bus bays shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1256; attached bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1261 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus bay and attached
bus stop pad shall be spaced from the intersections according to City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall be placed to provide 50% shade
coverage to bus stop pad at full maturity.

6. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles FOR MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS, they shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped, or colored concrete, or other



Page 240
pavement treatments that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive
aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances, bus stop, and public sidewalks, using the most direct route
for pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. An updated Master Street Plan showing all public arterial and collector streets
shall be submitted to the Street Transportation Department and Planning and
Development Department for review and approval, prior to preliminary site plan
approval.

9. The Developer shall submit an updated Traffic Impact Study to the Street
Transportation Department prior to preliminary site plan approval for the first
phase of development permitted by Amendment G of the Algodón PUD. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and
approved. The applicant shall be responsible for any dedications and required
improvements as recommended by the approved study and as approved by the
Planning and Development and Street Transportation Department.

10. The applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project Information
Form for the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to Mr. Alan Hilty,
(602)262-6193, with the Street Transportation Department. This form is a
requirement of the EPA to meet clean air quality requirements.

11. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

12. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

13. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS IN A FORM
APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. THE WAIVER SHALL BE
RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (4 Pages)




Page 241
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-19-G-00-5

Within a portion of Section 21 and 28, Township 2 North, Range 1 East of the Gila and
Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more particularly
described as follows:

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor's Parcel Number 102-26-016:
LOT 11 ALGODON MEDICAL OFFICE PARK ACCORDING TO BOOK 978 OF MAPS,
PAGE 34

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor's Parcel Number 102-26-017:
LOT 12 ALGODON MEDICAL OFFICE PARK ACCORDING TO BOOK 978 OF MAPS,
PAGE 34

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor's Parcel Number 102-26-018:
LOT 13 ALGODON MEDICAL OFFICE PARK ACCORDING TO BOOK 978 OF MAPS,
PAGE 34

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor's Parcel Number 102-26-019:
LOT 14 ALGODON MEDICAL OFFICE PARK ACCORDING TO BOOK 978 OF MAPS,
PAGE 34

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor's Parcel Number 102-26-020:
LOT 15 ALGODON MEDICAL OFFICE PARK ACCORDING TO BOOK 978 OF MAPS,
PAGE 34

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor's Parcel Number 102-26-022:
LOT 17 ALGODON MEDICAL OFFICE PARK ACCORDING TO BOOK 978 OF MAPS,
PAGE 34

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor's Parcel Number 102-26-023:
LOT 18 ALGODON MEDICAL OFFICE PARK ACCORDING TO BOOK 978 OF MAPS,
PAGE 34

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor's Parcel Number 102-26-024:
LOT 19 ALGODON MEDICAL OFFICE PARK ACCORDING TO BOOK 978 OF MAPS,
PAGE 34

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor's Parcel Number 102-26-025
TRACT A, ALGODON MEDICAL OFFICE PARK ACCORDING TO BOOK 978 OF
MAPS, PAGE 34

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor's Parcel Number 102-26-028:
LOT 3, A REPLAT OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF ALGODON MEDICAL OFFICE PARK
ACCORDING TO BOOK 1247 OF MAPS, PAGE 19



Page 242
Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor’s Parcel Number 102-26-029:
LOT 4 OF “ALGODÒN MEDICAL OFFICE PARK LOTS 3 AND 4” AS RECORDED IN
BOOK 1247 OF MAPS, PAGE 19, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor’s Parcel Number 102-26-026:
LOT 8, REPLAT OF LOTS 8, 9 AND 10 OF ALGODÒN MEDICAL OFFICE PARK
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 1102 OF MAPS, PAGE
15, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor’s Parcel Number 102-26-027:
LOT 9, ALGODÒN MEDICAL OFFICE PARK, A REPLAT OF LOTS 8, 9 AND 10 OF
“ALGODÒN MEDICAL OFFICE PARK” ACCORDING TO BOOK 1102 OF MAPS,
PAGE 15, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor’s Parcel Number 102-26-021:
LOT 16, ALGODÒN MEDICAL OFFICE PARK, ACCORDING TO BOOK 978 OF
MAPS, PAGE 34, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA

Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor’s Parcel Number 102-18-005E:
THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 2646.32 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER (WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 21) OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 01
SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE (EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE) OF
SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 1461.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE AGUA FRIA FREEWAY, STATE ROUTE 417 FROM
WHICH THE CENTER OF SECTION BEARS NORTH 88 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 01
SECONDS EAST, 1197.35 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-
WAY AS FOLLOWS:
SOUTH 22 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 19 SECONDS EAST, 95.60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST, 1000.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 501.60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST, 476.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 11 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 580.30 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 81 DEGREES 01 MINUTES WEST, 614.97 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 01 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 34
SECONDS EAST, 47.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER FROM WHICH THE SOUTHEAST CORNER (SOUTH
QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 21) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER BEARS
NORTH 88 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST, 08.22 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 88 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 1743.63 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.




Page 243
Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor’s Parcel Number 102-25-002S:
THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 28, MEASURE; THENCE SOUTH
00 DEGREES
15 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 28, 591.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUING SOUTH
00 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 432.48
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 09 SECONDS WEST, 1325.69
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST, 674.44
FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST, 1325.56
FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 28; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST
ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 949.37 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST COMER OF SAID
NORTHEAST QUARTER (EAST QUARTER CORNER SECTION 28); THENCE
SOUTH 88 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER (EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE), 2438.78 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE AGUA FRIA FREEWAY,
STATE ROUTE 417 FROM WHICH THE CENTER OF SECTION 28 BEARS SOUTH
88 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST, 211.90 FEET; THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AS FOLLOWS:
NORTH 01 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST, 915.03 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 08 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST, 504.88 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST, 1020.28 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 130.03 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, 323.16 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 01 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 44
SECONDS WEST, 55.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 18
MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1644.87 FEET, FROM
WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 28 BEARS NORTH 88 DEGREES
18 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, 315.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES
15 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST, 210.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 18
MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, 232.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 15
MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST, 50.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 18
MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, 41.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 15
MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST, 14.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 44
MINUTES 09 SECONDS WEST, 48.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 15
MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST, 4.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 44
MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST, 48.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 15
MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST, 120.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 08
MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 195.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.




Page 244
Legal Description for Maricopa County Assessor’s Parcel Number APN 102-26-003F
APN 102-26-004A, APN 102-26-003G:

THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE
1 EAST OF THE
GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 28;
THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 1623.64 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST,
PERPENDICULAR TO SAID NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 35.00
FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE AGUA FRIA
FREEWAY, STATE ROUTE 417;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY AS FOLLOWS;
THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 402.52 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, 114.02 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 190.26 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 23 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 117.28 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 05 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, 484.94 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST, 1003.19 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 926.48 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER FROM
WHICH THE CENTER OF SECTION 28 BEARS NORTH 88 DEGREES 24 MINUTES
01 SECONDS EAST, 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 28
SECONDS WEST, 73.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 58
SECONDS EAST, 500.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 13
SECONDS WEST, 500.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 16
SECONDS WEST, 707.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 26
SECONDS WEST, 725.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 27
SECONDS WEST, 99.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 13
SECONDS WEST, 200.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 47
SECONDS EAST, 80.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28, FROM WHICH THE SOUTH
QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 28 BEARS NORTH 88 DEGREES 30 MINUTES
13 SECONDS EAST, 516.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 13
SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 2133.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 28; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 04
SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER,
2638.00 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 28;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28, 2638.37 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING..




Page 245
Page 246
Attachment B




Staff Report Z-19-G-00-5
(Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022

Maryvale Village Planning January 12, 2021
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 3, 2021
Request From: PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development,
Planned Community District) (672.92 acres)
Request To: PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development,
Planned Community District) (672.92 acres)
Proposed Use: Major amendment to Algodón Center PUD to
allow single-family and multifamily residential
Location: Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to
99th Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell
Avenue
Owner: John F Long Properties LLLP, et al.
Applicant/Representative: Stephen Anderson, Gammage & Burnham PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

General Plan Conformity
General Plan Land Use Designation Mixed-Use (Commercial / Industrial)
Street Map 65 to 75-foot east half
99th Avenue Arterial
Classification street right-of-way
Campbell Avenue Collector 30-foot half street
Indian School Road 68 plus-foot total right-of-
(West of Loop 101) Major way
Indian School Road Arterial 55 plus-foot south half
(East of Loop 101) street
33 to 55-foot west half
91st Avenue Arterial
street right-of-way
50 to 85-foot north half
Thomas Rd Arterial
street right-of-way
Freeway As required by Arizona
Loop 101/Agua
Frontage Department of
Fria Freeway
Road Transportation (ADOT)




Page 247
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CLEAN NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Facilitate the
acquisition of vacant, underutilized and blighted parcels for appropriate
redevelopment, compatible with the adjacent neighborhood character and
adopted area plans.
The PUD area contains several parcels that have long been vacant, and the
proposed addition of residential uses is compatible with the residential character of
the surrounding area.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of
housing types and densities where appropriate within each village that
support a broad range of lifestyles.
The Algodón Center PUD currently permits high-density multifamily residential, and
this proposal will allow multifamily residential at a lower density and single-family
residential uses which contribute to a mix of housing types in the Maryvale Village.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposed performance standards for the residential uses provides enhanced
open space, landscape setbacks and shading requirements which will reduce the
urban heat island effect while also improving thermal comfort to site users and the
surrounding neighborhood.


Applicable Plan, Overlays, and Initiatives
Housing Phoenix Plan – See Background Item No. 10.

Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See Background Item No. 11.

Complete Streets Guiding Principles – See Background Item No. 12.

Tree and Shade Master Plan – See Background Item No. 13.

Zero Waste PHX – See Background Item No. 14.




Page 248
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Agricultural land, multifamily PUD PCD
residential, office
North Fire station, school, single-family PUD, S-1, R1-6, C-1,
residential, self-service storage, office C-2 SP
South Vacant, former agricultural land, PUD, C-2 H-R PCD,
medical office, retail GCP PCD, C-2 PCD
East (across 91st Retail, education center, single-family R1-6, R-3, C-2
Avenue) residential, grocery store
West (across 99th Multifamily residential, gas station, R-3, C-2, PAD (City of
Avenue) vacant land Avondale)

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone a 672.92-acre site located in an area generally bounded by
91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue from PUD PCD
(Planned Unit Development, Planned Community District) to PUD PCD (Planned Unit
Development, Planned Community District). This request is a Major Amendment to
the Algodón Center PUD to allow single-family and multifamily residential densities
less than 20 dwelling units per acre. No changes are proposed to the non-residential
uses or multifamily residential greater than 20 dwelling units per acre use and
associated development standards as permitted currently with the PUD.

2. The subject site has a General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed Use
(Commercial / Industrial). The surrounding designation to the south is Commercial.
The designations to the east are Commercial, Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per
acre, Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Residential 5 to 10 dwelling
units per acre. The designations to the north are Commercial, Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, and Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce Park). The designations to the west are Commercial and
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre. Parcels south of Indian School Road and
west of 99th Avenue are within the City of Avondale.

The request to allow residential densities less than 20 dwelling units per acre is not
consistent with the Mixed Use (Commercial / Industrial) designation. A General Plan
Amendment (GPA-MV-1-21-5) requesting that approximately half of the PUD area be
changed to Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre, Residential 5 to 10 dwelling
units per acre, and Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre has been filed
concurrently with this request. If approved, this request is consistent with the General
Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,




Page 249
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre, and Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per
acre.
General Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning and Development Department




Page 250
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


EXISTING CONDITIONS & SURROUNDING ZONING
3. The PUD area is generally bound 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas Road to
Campbell Avenue, and the Loop 101 Freeway bifurcates the site. The PUD permits a
range of commercial, office, retail and commerce park uses in addition to high-density
multifamily residential.

The PUD area contains agricultural land, multifamily residences, and office uses. To
the south is vacant land zoned PUD, medical offices, and a hospital zoned C-2 HR
PCD (Intermedial Commercial District, High-Rise and High Density District, Planned
Community District). To the west is multifamily residential zoned R-2 (Multifamily
Residential District), R-3 (Multifamily Residential District), and vacant land within the
City of Avondale. To the east are several retail and commercial uses zoned C-2,
single-family residential zoned R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) and a learning
center for the Pendergast School District zoned R-3. The Pendergast School District
office is located southwest of Indian School Road and 91st Avenue and is zoned S-1
(Ranch or Farm Residence). To the north is a school zoned PUD, a fire station zoned
S-1, single-family residences zoned R1-6, self-service storage zoned C-2 SP
(Intermediate Commercial District, Special Permit), and office zoned C-1
(Neighborhood Retail District).

The proposed sites for the residential developments at densities less than 20 dwelling
units per acre are west of the freeway and south of Indian School Road and the two
parcels south of Indian School Road east of the freeway are to the north and south of
the Pendergast School District office.

4 The PUD is also within the Agua Source: City of Phoenix General Plan 2015
Fria Employment Center, a City
of Phoenix designated
Employment Center and the
Algodón Major Employment
Center as designated by the
Maricopa Association of
Governments and as listed in the




Page 251
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


APPROVAL AND AMENDMENT HISTORY
5. The Algodón Center PCD was approved by the Phoenix City Council in 2000 via
Rezoning Case No. Z-19-00-5.

607.52 acres of the PCD to a PUD to allow a mix of uses (multifamily, residential,
retail, office, and commerce park), via case Z-19-B-00-5. A subsequent amendment
in 2011, Z-19-C-00-5, was withdrawn prior to being granted City Council approval.

May 2012, via case Z-19-D-00-5, for the previously existing 607.52-acre PUD PCD
with additional acreage from adjacent parcels. The request designated approximately
852.61 acres generally located west of the 93rd Avenue alignment as a Planned Unit
Development (Algodón PUD).

In 2015 City Council approved another Major Amendment Z-19-E-00-5 to the existing
852.61-acre PUD PCD. This request was to adjust the Algodón PUD PCD boundary
to exclude approximately 50.86 acres at the northwest corner of 91st Avenue and the
Campbell Avenue alignment and was processed with companion case Z-36-15-5 for
a single-family residential development.

In 2018 City Council approved another Major Amendment Z-19-F-00-5 to the existing
804.82-acre PUD PCD. The request was to adjust the Algodón PUD PCD boundary
to exclude approximately 131.27-acres at the northeast corner of Loop 101/Agua Fria
Freeway and Indian School Road with companion case Z-16-18-5 for single-family
residential.

PROPOSAL
6. The proposal was developed utilizing the PUD zoning designation. The Planned Unit
Development (PUD) is intended to create a built environment that is superior to that
produced by conventional zoning districts and design guidelines. Using a
collaborative and comprehensive approach, an applicant authors and proposes
standards and guidelines that are tailored to the context of a site on a case by case
basis. Where the PUD Development Narrative is silent on a requirement, the
applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions will be applied.

7. Below is a summary of the proposed modified and additional standards for the
subject site, as described in the attached Algodón Center PUD Narrative date
stamped December 29, 2021. The PUD already permits multifamily residential uses
at a minimum of 20 dwelling units per acre with a maximum density of 52.2 dwelling
units per acre. This proposal is to allow residential densities less than 20 dwelling
units per acre and adds single-family attached and single-family detached uses to the
use list. This proposal limits the amount of residential development by the following
provisions as listed in the narrative:




Page 252
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


• The total residential units allowed in the PUD area is limited to 25,689.
• Residential uses with a density of less than 20 units per acre are only
permitted within 353 gross acres of the total PUD area.
• Residential uses with a density of less than 20 units per acre are only
permitted on parcels designated as Residential on the General Plan Land Use
Map.

The conceptual site plan attached as an exhibit shows 1,544 units in a mix of single-
family detached, single-family attached, and multifamily residential unit types. The
elevations show a variety of floorplans, body colors, and architectural styles for each
residential unit type. These are shown for conceptual purposes, and the proposed
development will need to comply with the PUD standards and guidelines as listed in
the narrative. To ensure that the proposal produces high-quality residential
developments that are compatible with the existing residential uses surrounding the
PUD area and are buffered from the freeway, the proposal includes several
performance standards for multifamily residential with densities less than 20 dwelling
units per acre, single-family attached, single-family detached uses:

Multifamily Residential Less Than 20 Dwelling Units Per Are
Development Standards
Standard Proposed
Density 14 dwelling units per acre maximum
Building Height 30 feet maximum
Open Space 15 percent minimum
Amenity Standards A central community gathering space or at
least 10,000 square feet containing a
community pool.
Freeway Building Separation Average 70 feet from ADOT right-of-way,
minimum 40 feet from ADOT right-of way
Maximum Lot Coverage 50 percent
Perimeter Building Setbacks
Street 15 feet minimum
Side 10 feet minimum
Front 10 feet
Rear 10 feet
Perimeter Landscape Setbacks
Street 15 feet average, 10 feet minimum
Rear, side, not adjacent to street 10 feet




Page 253
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


Single-Family Attached
Development Standards
Standard Proposed
Density 15 dwelling unit per acre maximum
Building Height 30 feet maximum
Open Space 15 percent minimum
Maximum Garage Width 2 spaces
Minimum Lot Width 22 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage 50 percent
Minimum Building Setbacks
Freeway Where adjacent to the southbound Indian
School on-ramp to the Loop 101, average
50’ from ADOT right-of-way, minimum 20’
from ADOT right-of-way. Otherwise,
average 70’ from ADOT right-of-way,
minimum 40’ from ADOT right-of-way
Subdivision Boundary 20 feet
Perimeter Street 20 feet
Individual Lot Front to Private 10 feet
Drive
Individual Lot Side to Private 10 feet
Drive
Individual Lot Rear 2nd Story to 2 feet
Private Drive
Building Separation 10 feet
Front to Non-Street (Paseo) lot 3 feet
line
Side to Non-Street (Paseo) lot 0 feet
line




Page 254
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


Single-Family Detached
Development Standards
Standard Proposed
45 feet to 50 feet 70 feet wide lots
wide lots
Density 5.5 dwelling units pe 4 dwelling units per acre
acre maximum maximum
Building Height 30 feet
Open Space 15 percent minimum
Amenity Area Requirements A Major Amenity Area shall be provided for any
subdivision containing at least 1,000 dwelling
units, shall be a minimum of 5 acres, and shall
contain a community pool, 40,000 square feet of
open turf, and a basketball court, in addition to
the amenities required in Local Amenity Areas.

A Local Amenity shall be provided for every 350
dwelling units (or portion thereof), shall contain at
least 10,000 square feet of open turf area, a
ramada, a grill, and two picnic tables.

A Pocket Amenity may be provided in lieu of a
Local Amenity for every 125 dwelling units (or
portion thereof), shall contain one amenity item
such as, but not limited to, exercise equipment,
climbing features, horseshoe or open play areas.
Freeway Building Separation Average 70 feet from ADOT right-of-way,
minimum 40 feet from ADOT right-of way
Maximum Garage Width 2 car widths 3 car widths
Minimum Perimeter Setbacks 5 foot side, 15 foot 5 foot side, 20 foot rear
rear
Minimum Building Setbacks
Front 10 feet 10 feet
Garage 18 feet 18 feet
Side-Loaded Garage 10 feet 10 feet
Side 5 feet, 5 feet 5 feet, 10 feet
Rear 15 feet 20 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage 50 percent




Page 255
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


8. Design Guidelines

The PUD proposed enhanced design guidelines that are above Zoning Ordinance
standards for single-family residential uses including a minimum of four different lot
types, a minimum of 18 body colors, roof options and floor plans offered, and
required exterior accent materials such as varying shutter types, accent sliding, and
stone/brick profiles. Further, lots that are less than 45 feet wide are subject to
approval by either the design advisor or the Single-Family Architectural Appeals
Board for demonstrating enhanced architecture that minimizes the impact of the
garage.

The PUD also ensures that perimeter walls include breaks and offsets and that walls
adjacent to the freeway have variations in block type and color.

9. Streetscape and Landscape Standards

The proposal requires that all residential developments provide minimum 5-foot-wide
sidewalks detached from the curb by a minimum of 5 feet, or as required by the
Street Classification Map. Further, the proposal requires planting standards for
landscape setbacks that include 50 percent 2-inch caliper trees and 50 percent 3-inch
caliper trees. The proposal also requires that all residential developments provide 15
percent open space, which is three times the required amount in the Zoning
Ordinance.

AREA PLANS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND INITIATIVES
10. Housing Phoenix Plan
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with a
vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid population
growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000 new housing
units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a primary reason
why housing costs are increasing.

The proposed development supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000
housing units by 2030 by contributing to a variety housing types that will address the
supply shortage.

11. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of destinations.




Page 256
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


The PUD contains existing standards for bicycle parking for commercial and
multifamily residential uses which remain unchanged for this request.
12. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To support these principles related to
pedestrian connectivity and safety, Stipulation No. 6 requires that where pedestrian
pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped
or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that visually contrast with the
adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces. Further, Stipulation No. 7 requires that
clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect building
entrances, bus stop, and public sidewalks, using the most direct route for
pedestrians.
13. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and
development process. By investing in trees and the urban forest, the city can reduce
its carbon footprint, decrease energy costs, reduce storm water runoff, increase
biodiversity, address the urban heat island effect, clean the air, and increase property
values. In addition, trees can help to create walkable streets and vibrant pedestrian
places. The proposal includes enhanced landscape setbacks and shading standards
within the PUD narrative.
14. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial and mixed-use developments
meeting certain criteria. The proposed project will be subject to the City of Phoenix
waste collection and recycling requirements.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
15. At the time this staff report was written, staff has not received any correspondence
from members of the public regarding this request. Staff did receive a letter of support
from the Pendergast School District.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
16. The Phoenix Fire Department has noted that the dimensions and details for
turnaround areas at the ends of these fire lanes will require approval, all access gates
across fire lanes will require permits through Fire Prevention and that gates shall




Page 257
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


comply with Chapter 5 of the 2018 International Fire Code with City of Phoenix
amendments from Fire Prevention.

17. The City of Phoenix Water Services Department has noted that the site has existing
water and sewer mains that can potentially serve the development and that water
capacity is a dynamic condition that can change over time due to a variety of factors.

18. The Public Transit Department requested right-of-way dedications, bus stop pads and
bus bays at multiple locations along the PUD area. The Public Transit Department
also requested that where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, the pathways are
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement
treatments that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces. In
addition, the Public Transit Department requested that clearly defined, accessible
pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect building entrances, bus stop, and
public sidewalks, using the most direct route for pedestrians. These requirements are
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 through 7.

19. The Street Transportation Department requested that all street improvements be
made to current ADA guidelines, that the applicant provide a Traffic Impact Study and
submit information to the MAG Transportation Improvement Program and that an
updated Master Street Plan be submitted. These requirements are addressed in
Stipulation Nos. 8 through 11.

OTHER
20. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in the
event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all ground
disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the City of
Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to
properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 12.

21. The developer shall provide a hydraulic/hydrologic analysis of offsite storm water
flows, when present, at the time of preliminary site plan submittal for verification of
required infrastructure regarding lot space and density.

22. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal actions
such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be required.

Findings

1. The proposal will redevelop an underutilized property and provide a high quality
residential development which will help alleviate the housing shortage in Phoenix.

2. This proposal provides for additional housing options in the Maryvale Village and




Page 258
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


contributes to the balance of housing and employment opportunities within a Major
Employment Center.

3. The proposal includes several development standards that exceed conventional
Zoning Ordinance standards such as increased open space, design and shading
standards.


Stipulations

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Algodón Centre PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped December 29, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the date information on the cover page to add the
following:


b. Page 15, Table 3A, Streetscape Section, Item 1: Rename section to
“Landscape Setback” and delete “measured from back of curb” from first
sentence.

c. Page 15, Table 3A, Low Density Residential Sidewalks Section: Update
the first sentence to read “For any residential parcel where density is less
than 20 dwelling units per gross acres, sidewalks shall be a minimum of
five feet wide, and shall be separated from the curb per the requirements
of the Street Classification Map with a minimum five foot wide landscape
strip.

d. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 1: Rename section to
“Landscape Setback” and delete “measured from back of curb” from first
sentence.

e. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 2, Bullet Point 1: Add “and
utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

f. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 2, Bullet Point 2: Add “and
utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.




Page 259
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


g. Page 18, Table 3B, Perimeter Adjacent to Loop 101 Section, Item 2,
Bullet Point 1: Add “and utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

h. Page 18, Table 3B, Perimeter Adjacent to Loop 101 Section, Item 2,
Bullet Point 2: Add “and utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

2. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and ensure bus stop pad(s) at the
following locations, with final siting to be approved by the Public Transit
Department:

a. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Earl Drive alignment.

b. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Osborn Road alignment.

c. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Clarendon Avenue alignment.

d. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Glenrosa Avenue alignment.

e. Southbound 91st Avenue south of Osborn Road alignment.

f. Southbound 91st Avenue south of Cheery Lynn Road alignment.

g. Westbound Thomas Road at approximately 9700 West Thomas Road.

3. Bus stop pads shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pad shall be spaced from the
intersection according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall be
placed to provide 50% shade coverage to bus stop pad at full maturity.

4. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and ensure bus bay with bus stop pad
at the following locations, final siting to be approved by the Public Transit
Department:

a. Northbound 99th Avenue north of Thomas Road.

b. Northbound 99th Avenue north of Indian School Road.

5. Bus bays shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1256; attached bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1261 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus bay and attached
bus stop pad shall be spaced from the intersections according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall be placed to provide 50% shade coverage to
bus stop pad at full maturity.




Page 260
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022


6. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances, bus stop, and public sidewalks, using the most direct route for
pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. An updated Master Street Plan showing all public arterial and collector streets
shall be submitted to the Street Transportation Department and Planning and
Development Department for review and approval, prior to preliminary site plan
approval.

9. The Developer shall submit an updated Traffic Impact Study to the Street
Transportation Department prior to preliminary site plan approval for the first
phase of development permitted by Amendment G of the Algodón PUD. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and
approved. The applicant shall be responsible for any dedications and required
improvements as recommended by the approved study and as approved by the
Planning and Development and Street Transportation Department.

10. The applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project Information Form
for the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to Mr. Alan Hilty, (602)262-
6193, with the Street Transportation Department. This form is a requirement of
the EPA to meet clean air quality requirements.

11. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

12. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

Writer
Sarah Stockham
January 7, 2022

Team Leader
Samantha Keating




Page 261
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón Center PUD)
January 7, 2022



Exhibits
Sketch Map
Aerial Map
Site Plan date stamped March 16, 2021 (3 pages)
Elevations date stamped March 16, 2021 (42 pages)
Algodón Center PUD date stamped December 29, 2021
Correspondence




Page 262
DR
R1-6 PRD R1-6 PRD* MEADOWBROOK AVE
E

91ST DR
102N
99TH DR 92ND AVE
DA

94TH LN
L
D AV
Z-109-08 AN X 424
R1-6 * GU ANX 214
95TH DR
R1-6 MINNEZONA AVE


95TH AVE
ANX 174 A R-2
Z-117-99
Z-36-15
KIN PUD
OL


101ST AVE
N S-1
Z-28-12 Z-112-99
R1-6 R1-6 CAMPBELL AVE
SP * R1-6
ANX 174 SELLS DR
Z-30-20
SP * PUD*
Z-19-D-00
ANX 161

O
SALT
Z-30-20
ROMA AVE

94TH DR
R1-6 *

91ST LN
R-2 *

93RD LN 93RD DR
91ST GLEN
ANX 174




94TH AVE
R-4 ANX 161-A


N CIR
R-3 * TURNEY AVE
Z-158-01


91ST AVE
R1-6 * MONTECITO AVE
ANX 174




93RD GLEN
R-3 *
ANX 174 GLENROSA AVE



87TH LN
1 R1-6 * R1-6
SR HEATHERBRAE DR


ANX 161-B
R1-6 * *

92ND LN
AN X 230
R-3A PRD *
Z- 59 -0 3
R1 * 01
Z-13-00 R1-8
99TH LN
103RD AVE
-6 R-2 * Z-19-00 AN X 209

R-3
Z-12-08



86TH AVE
Z-19-D-00 Z-38-99
P
RM
Z-19-E-00
C-2* Z-42-94 Z-16-18 MACKENZIE DR


88TH AVE
Z- 30 -20

MONTEROSA AVE DEVONSHIRE AVE


89TH LN
C-1*
R-2 PRD *



100TH AVE
C-2 *
C-2 SP
ANX 174



86TH DR
C-2 SP *
AN X 209 Z-7-05
Z-28-04 R1-6 AN X 209 AN X 209
AN X 230 Z-19-93 MONTEROSA ST
C-2 *
Z-47-99
Z-47-99
Z-21-21 Z-148-02

Z-47-99 Z-SP-1-05
Z-SP-2-21

R-4A *
ANX 174
C-2 R-4A
Z-62-92 C-2
AN X 230 w
v
101 PSC
C-1
Z-13-00
INDIAN SCHOOL RD
C-2
AN X 230
C-3
Z-13-00 VALE DR
Phoenix City Limits PUD P CD *




AVONDALE
Z-19-D-00



C-2*
89TH AVE 88TH LN
AMELIA AVE
Z-8-94



R-2 * PICCADILLY RD
R-3 *
Z-43-84
Z-97-83
Z-41-84



FAIRMOUNT AVE


S-1* INDIANOLA AVE R1-6 *

88TH DR
Z-97-83



87TH AVE
Z-87-97
S-1*
86TH LN
CLARENDON AVE
Z-SP-19-98
E
DO N AV
WEL


87TH DR
S AVE
MBU
CO LU
V E
PUD PCD * T ON A
WHIT
ANX 230
Z-13-00
OSBORN RD
Z-19-00
Z-19-B-00
Z-19-D-00 MULBERRY DR
R1-6
90TH DR
Z-19-E-00
FLOWER ST
Z-19-F-00
MONTEREY WAY



89TH DR
CHEERY LYNN RD


EARLL DR




Phoenix City Limits
AVALON DR

PINCHOT AVE


CATALINA DR
C-2 *
Z-83-00


GCP C-2 PCD* Z-19-00
C-2
AN X 253
Z-81-01 VERDE LN
Z-19-00 Z-132-01

THOMAS RD
R-3 R1-6 R1-6

PUD D AN X 253 AN X 253 AN X 81
Z-132-01


PC
Z-81-01 Z-81-01

ANX 210 S-1 C-2 H-R
SP PC D
C-2 *
Z-132-01 Z-132-01

ROANOKE AVE
Z-29-12 R AVE
Z-3-17
R-3 *
H- -01
AN X 210 Z-SP-32-01
Z-163-01
Z-59-99 Z-284-84


2 -163 93RD
C- Z
Ma rico p a C ou n ty As se sso r's Office

VE
RA
R-2 * D SO
Z-284-84 WIN




Miles
I Z-19-G-00


CAMELBACK RD
0.25 0.125 0 0.25 G
RAN
MARYVALE VILLAGE
SR 1 0 1
D INDIAN SCHOOL RD
E


107TH AVE
AV

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 THOMAS RD


MC DOWELL RD


99TH AVE 91ST AVE
83RD AVE 75TH AVE 67TH AVE 59TH AVE 51ST AVE 43RD AVE 35TH AVE 27TH AVE




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Gammage & Burnham PLC-Stephen Anderson
FROM:
PUD PCD ( 672.92 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
5/27/2021
Z-19-G-00 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
G-2, G-3,
672.92 Acres QS 15-5, 15-6, 16-5,
H-2, H-3 TO: PUD PCD ( 672.92 a.c.)
16-6, 17-5
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
PUD PCD 25, 689 N/A
PUD PCD 25, 689 N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2000\Z-19-G-00.mxd
Page 263
DR MEADOWBROOK AVE
R1-6 PRD R1-6 PRD*
E

102N 91ST DR
99TH DR 92ND AVE
DA L
D AV
94TH LN
MINNEZONA AVE

Z-109-08 AN X 424
R1-6 * GU ANX 214
95TH DR
R1-6
95TH AVE
A R-2 Z-36-15
KIN
ANX 174
Z-117-99
OL PUD
N

101ST AVE
S-1
Z-28-12 Z-112-99
R1-6 R1-6 CAMPBELL AVE
SP *
ANX 174 R1-6 SELLS DR
Z-30-20
SP * PUD*
Z-19-D-00
ANX 161

ROMA AVE
O
SALT
Z-30-20




94TH DR
R1-6 *

91ST LN
R-2 *

93RD LN 93RD DR
91ST GLEN
ANX 174




94TH AVE
R-4
TURNEY AVE
ANX 161-A

N CIR
R-3 *
Z-158-01
MONTECITO AVE

91ST AVE
R1-6 *
ANX 174




93RD GLEN
R-3 *
ANX 174 GLENROSA AVE



87TH LN
SR 1 R1-6 * R1-6 HEATHERBRAE DR


ANX 161-B
R1-6 * *

92ND LN
AN X 230
R-3A PRD *
Z- 59 -0 3
R1 * 01
Z-13-00 R1-8
99TH LN
103RD AVE
-6 R-2 * Z-19-00 AN X 209

R-3
Z-12-08



86TH AVE
Z-19-D-00 Z-38-99

MACKENZIE DR
P
RM
Z-19-E-00
C-2* Z-42-94 Z-16-18




88TH AVE
Z- 30 -20

MONTEROSA AVE DEVONSHIRE AVE


89TH LN
C-1*
R-2 PRD *



100TH AVE
C-2 *
C-2 SP
ANX 174



86TH DR
C-2 SP *
R1-6 AN X 209 Z-7-05 MONTEROSA ST
Z-28-04 AN X 209 AN X 209
AN X 230 Z-19-93

C-2 *
Z-47-99
Z-47-99
Z-21-21 Z-148-02


101 Z-47-99 Z-SP-1-05
Z-SP-2-21

R-4A * C-2 R-4A
Z-62-92 C-2 v
w PSC
INDIAN SCHOOL RD
AN X 230
ANX 174
Z-13-00
C-1
C-2 C-3
VALE DR
AN X 230
Z-13-00

Phoenix City Limits PUD P CD *




AVONDALE
Z-19-D-00



C-2*
89TH AVE
AMELIA AVE
88TH LN
Z-8-94



R-2 * PICCADILLY RD
R-3 *
Z-43-84
Z-97-83
Z-41-84



FAIRMOUNT AVE


S-1* INDIANOLA AVE R1-6 *

88TH DR
Z-97-83



87TH AVE
Z-87-97
S-1* CLARENDON AVE

86TH LN
Z-SP-19-98
E
DO N AV
WEL


87TH DR
S AVE
MBU
CO LU
V E
T ON A
PUD PCD * WHIT
ANX 230
Z-13-00
OSBORN RD
Z-19-00
Z-19-B-00
Z-19-D-00 MULBERRY DR
R1-6
90TH DR
Z-19-E-00
FLOWER ST
Z-19-F-00
MONTEREY WAY

CHEERY LYNN RD
89TH DR
EARLL DR

AVALON DR




Phoenix City Limits
PINCHOT AVE


CATALINA DR
C-2 *
Z-83-00


GCP C-2 PCD* Z-19-00
C-2
AN X 253
Z-81-01 VERDE LN
Z-19-00 Z-132-01

THOMAS RD
R-3 R1-6 R1-6

PUD D AN X 253 AN X 253 AN X 81
Z-132-01


PC
Z-81-01 Z-81-01

ANX 210 S-1 C-2 H-R
SP PC D
C-2 *
Z-132-01 Z-132-01

ROANOKE AVE
Z-29-12 R AVE
Z-3-17
R-3 *
H- -01
AN X 210 Z-SP-32-01
Z-163-01
Z-59-99 Z-284-84


2 -163 93RD VE
C- Z D SO
RA
WIN
R-2 *
Z-284-84




Miles
I Z-19-G-00


CAMELBACK RD
0.25 0.125 0 0.25
MARYVALE VILLAGE
G
RAN


SR 1 0 1
D INDIAN SCHOOL RD
E


107TH AVE
AV

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 THOMAS RD


MC DOWELL RD


99TH AVE 91ST AVE
83RD AVE 75TH AVE 67TH AVE 59TH AVE 51ST AVE 43RD AVE 35TH AVE 27TH AVE




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Gammage & Burnham PLC-Stephen Anderson
FROM:
PUD PCD ( 672.92 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
5/27/2021
Z-19-G-00 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
G-2, G-3,
672.92 Acres QS 15-5, 15-6, 16-5,
H-2, H-3 TO: PUD PCD ( 672.92 a.c.)
16-6, 17-5
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
PUD PCD 25, 689 N/A
PUD PCD 25, 689 N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2000\Z-19-G-00.mxd
Page 264
$/*2'21$*5(92&$%/(/$1'75867
38'
(/(9(1 

,1&/($6(
&



127$ 72:1+20(6
3$57
$&.$
/,0,7('
3$571(56+,3 6,1*/()$0,/<)255(17
3$'
*5266$&
1(7$&


 ;
+20(6,7(6



 ;
+20(6,7(6




:,//,$0/<21
+20(6,1&
3$'



  ;
+20(6,7(6

 ;
+20(6,7(6




(;,67,1*
$0(1,7< %,//%2$5'

$&




 ;  ;
 +20(6,7(6 +20(6,7(6


 ;
+20(6,7(6




$/*2'21$*
5(92&$%/(
/$1'75867
38'


 ;
+20(6,7(6





 ; $//(<
+20(6,7(6  ;
+20(6,7(6




35,0$5<(17<5<02180(17


/,)767$7,21 








:(67(51*$5'(1
  

3ODQ6FDOH  'DWH 

&RQFHSWXDO6LWH3ODQ $%/$678',2&20


Page 265
35,0$5<(17<5<02180(17


(;,67,1*
%,//%2$5'




$0(1,7<
$&




 ;
+20(6,7(6  ;  ;
+20(6,7(6 +20(6,7(6




 ;
+20(6,7(6




 ; $//(<
+20(6,7(6
 ;
+20(6,7(6




/,)767$7,21







:(67(51*$5'(1
  

3ODQ6FDOH  'DWH 

&RQFHSWXDO6LWH3ODQ3KDVH(QODUJPHQW $%/$678',2&20


Page 266
35,0$5<(17<5<02180(17




127$
3$57
72:1+20(6




6,1*/()$0,/<)255(17
*5266$&
1(7$&

 ;
+20(6,7(6




 ;
+20(6,7(6




 ;  ;  ;
+20(6,7(6 +20(6,7(6 +20(6,7(6




(;,67,1*
%,//%2$5'




$0(1,7<
$&



:(67(51*$5'(1
  

3ODQ6FDOH  'DWH 

&RQFHSWXDO6LWH3ODQ3KDVH(QODUJPHQW $%/$678',2&20


Page 267
Townhome Elevations




Page 268
)5217(/(9$7,21



Page 269




5,*+7(/(9$7,21




1 of 4
+DZHV&URVVLQJ 0HVD$= Multi-Family Product Elevation 
5($5(/(9$7,21



Page 270




/()7(/(9$7,21




2 of 4
+DZHV&URVVLQJ 0HVD$= 46' x 85' Product Elevation 
Page 271




3 of 4
+DZHV&URVVLQJ 0HVD$= Street Scene Perspective 
Page 272




4 of 4
+DZHV&URVVLQJ 0HVD$= Alley Perspective 
   
     #'(%!". '.(.  .
'*  .%).&"* . " "%.  .


 
   '* .."+.
'*  .#&"$%.&,.




   
'*  .'' .
 
'*  .


Page 273

'* .$ (.  
'*  .!%.%-.



       
-. '*  .!%.%-.












 
 4  '        
          
&)  -$(-%!)- "&'$ !-&-'- -
!!$--


 
   &) --!*-
&)  -"%!#$-%+-


   
     &) - $-$,-
&) -&&-
 
&)  -




  
&) -#'-  
&)  -





Page 274





 

  







 
 4  '        
       
(-  0&+0'#-!0 $()&"#0(0)0 0
% #!*0!0


    
  
(-  0&"0&#(*0



  
  
(- 0( #.00 (- 0((!0


 
(-0,),%0


    
Page 275
   
(- 0)#+0#0 (!0
(- 0'!"0



       
/0 (- 0'!"0



 









 4  '         
        
*/  1(-1)%/#1 &*+($%1 *1+ 1   1
'"%#,1 !#1


*/ 1* *#1           
*/ 1 ($1(%*,1



      
*/ 1*"%011 */  1)# $1



*/ 1.+.'1

 
 
   
    */ 1.+.'1
*/  1+%-1%1 *#1





Page 276




 

  








 4  '         
 %%%
  % %% %()&#$1(1) 1  1
(. 1&+1'$."1 (,#&(1"1


  
     %
(. 1-"1/1&$.#1



%"% %
(. 1!11  
$   !%
(. 1( ("1

%
(. 1"$!1(')1

Page 277  %%%

%"% %
# #%
(.1%&1.*1




"%%   %%
 01 (. 1)+"'1&/1



 









 4  '       
          
)/ 1',1(%/#1 &)*'$%1 )1* 1  1
)-$')1!#1


 
 
  
   )/ 1.#101 '%/$1
)/ 1*,#(1(01


  
)/ 1!"11




  

   1 
)/1&'1/+1
    

Page 278





    




  








 4  '        
             
    
&)  -$(- %!)- "&'$ !-&-'-  -
!- -



   

&)  -,-$*-




   
&) -&&-  


Page 279    


&)  -&!-)'-  
&) -!+#-$-



       
*- &) -!+#-$-



 









 4  '       
        
+/ 3)-3*&/$3 '+,)%&3+3,!3  3
&3 "$3


+/ 3+!+ $3   
+/ 3 .)$3 *&%23



        
+/ 3#2$3)03 +/ 3&!1#(3)$3



+/  3",3/&&"3

 
      

+/ 3+&3/,3     
+/  3",3/&&"3





Page 280





    




  








 4  '        
Examples of Other Lennar
Homesite Elevations




Page 281
Tradition Coronado | Plan 3522 | Approx. 2,268 sq.ft.
at Horizon 4 Bedroom | 3 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Elevation Renderings




Elevation E | Tuscan




Elevation F | French Country Elevation G | Italianate




1026 E. Weatherby Way | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 282
Tradition Coronado | Plan 3522 | Approx. 2,268 sq.ft.
at Horizon 4 Bedroom | 3 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Floorplans




COVERED PATIO




BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 2
GREAT ROOM 12'-0" X 11'-2" 13'-4" X 11'-2"
14'-4" X 17'-6"

DINING
15'-6" X 17'-6" BATH 2




KITCHEN
LAUNDRY
PANT.
LINEN
HALL W.I.C.

COAT
VEST.
2-BAY GARAGE
OPEN TO 19'-10" X 22'-0" OPEN
ABOVE TO
BELOW

OWNERS
BATH


FOYER
OWNERS SUITE
15'-0" X 17'-0"



BATH 3
COVERED
ENTRY



FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR
BEDROOM 4
10'-2" X 11'-4"




1026 E. Weatherby Way | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2019 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo,
Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 7.31.19
Page 283
Tradition Laguna | Plan 3623 | Approx. 2,342 sq.ft.
at Horizon 4 Bedroom | 3 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Elevation Renderings




Elevation C | Craftsman




Elevation F | French Country Elevation K | Farmhouse




1026 E. Weatherby Way | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 284
Tradition Laguna | Plan 3623 | Approx. 2,342 sq.ft.
at Horizon 4 Bedroom | 3 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Floorplans




PANT.


COVERED PATIO
KITCHEN
OWNERS SUITE
15'-10" X 17'-0"
LINEN



GREAT ROOM W.I.C.
OWNERS
20'-2" X 14'-10"
BATH


DINING
15'-2" X 10'-2"


BEDROOM 2 LAUNDRY
13'-2" X 11'-0" LINEN
HALL


GARAGE
19'-10" X 22'-0" COAT



BATH 2
FOYER
OPEN TO BATH 3 OPEN
ABOVE TO
BELOW

W.I.C. BEDROOM 3
10'-8" X 14'-0"




COVERED
FIRST FLOOR ENTRY BEDROOM 4 SECOND FLOOR
10'-4" X 11'-4"




1026 E. Weatherby Way | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2019 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo,
Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 7.31.19
Page 285
Tradition La Jolla | Plan 3624 | Approx. 2,615 sq.ft.
at Horizon 4 Bedroom | Loft | 3 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Elevation Renderings




Elevation C | Craftsman




Elevation D | Monterey Elevation F | French Country




1026 E. Weatherby Way | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 286
Tradition La Jolla | Plan 3624 | Approx. 2,615 sq.ft.
at Horizon 4 Bedroom | Loft | 3 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Floorplans




COVERED PATIO
DINING
17'-8" X 11'-4"

OWNERS
BATH
W.I.C.
OWNERS SUITE
15'-2" X 15'-0"
GREAT ROOM
18'-0" X 15'-0"



PANT.
KITCHEN
BEDROOM 2 LAUNDRY
11'-0" X 11'-2"



STOR. HALL


GARAGE HALL BATH 2
19'-10" X 22'-0"
W.I.C.
COAT

LINEN


FOYER BEDROOM 3
13'-4" X 10'-4" LOFT
BATH 3 10'-8" X 14'-0"
HALL




BEDROOM 4
10'-6" X 10'-4"
FIRST FLOOR COVERED
ENTRY SECOND FLOOR




1026 E. Weatherby Way | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2019 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo,
Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 7.31.19
Page 287
Tradition Balboa | Plan 3626 | Approx. 2,720 sq.ft.
at Horizon 5 Bedroom | 3 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Elevation Renderings




Elevation C | Craftsman




Elevation F | French Country Elevation K | Farmhouse




1026 E. Weatherby Way | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 288
Tradition Balboa | Plan 3626 | Approx. 2,720 sq.ft.
at Horizon 5 Bedroom | 3 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Floorplans




COVERED PATIO DINING
15'-4" X 9'-8" OWNERS
BATH




OWNERS SUITE LINEN
16'-0" X 15'-10"
W.I.C. W.I.C.
GREAT ROOM
20'-0" X 15'-0"


KITCHEN
PANT. VEST.
LAUNDRY


COAT

BEDROOM 2
13'-0" X 11'-10"

2-BAY GARAGE HALL
20'-2" X 22'-4"
OPEN TO OPEN TO
ABOVE BELOW
BATH 3 W.I.C.


FOYER HALL
HALL
BEDROOM 3
13'-2" X 11'-0" LINEN

BEDROOM 4
11'-2" X 15'-2"

BEDROOM 5 BATH 2
10'-4" X 11'-6"
COVERED
ENTRY
FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR




1026 E. Weatherby Way | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2019 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo,
Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 7.31.19
Page 289
Destiny Wayfarer II | Plan 5579 | Approx. 2,163 sq. ft.
4 Bedrooms | 3 Baths
at Arroyo Seco 3-Bay Tandem Garage | RV Garage
Elevation Renderings

PRELIMINARY




Elevation C




Elevation B Elevation D




3315 N. 197th Lane | Buckeye, AZ 85396 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 290
Destiny Wayfarer II | Plan 5579 | Approx. 2,163 sq. ft.
4 Bedrooms | 3 Baths
at Arroyo Seco 3-Bay Tandem Garage | RV Garage
Elevation Renderings

PRELIMINARY

New CAD iPlan Arroyo Specific.

OWNER'S
Question on SUITE
(14’-6” x 15’-0”) GREAT ROOM COVERED
(14’-6” x 17’-0”)
BR 4 VS DEN w/double doors PATIO

and closet?


Owner’s suite bath
split top vanity
10’ GARAGE DOOR



OWNER'S
BATH
DINING
(9’-0” x 13’-0”)




KITCHEN
WIC

PANT.

STUDY
RV GARAGE BEDROOM 4
(15’-0” x 50’-0”) (11’-6” x 10’-2”)
BATH 3


COAT LIN.



(10’-6” x 12’-0”) HALL
LAUN.
BEDROOM 3
(11’-6” x 10’-5”)




3-BAY
FOYER
TANDEM BATH 2
GARAGE
(20’-0” x 21’-0”)




COVERED BEDROOM 2
ENTRY (11’-0” x 12’-0”)




3315 N. 197th Lane | Buckeye, AZ 85396 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. . y Copyright © 2019 Lennar Corporation. All grights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar
logo, Everything’s Included, the Everything’s Included logo, NextGen and the NextGen logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 1.11.21
Page 291
Destiny Outlander II | Plan 5581 | Approx. 2,296 sq. ft.
3 Bedrooms | Study | 2.5 Baths
at Arroyo Seco 3-Bay Tandem Garage | RV Garage
Elevation Renderings

PRELIMINARY




Elevation D




Elevation B Elevation C




3315 N. 197th Lane | Buckeye, AZ 85396 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 292
Destiny Outlander II | Plan 5581 | Approx. 2,296 sq. ft.
3 Bedrooms | Study | 2.5 Baths
at Arroyo Seco 3-Bay Tandem Garage | RV Garage
Elevation Renderings

PRELIMINARY




COVERED New CAD iPlan Arroyo Specific.
OWNER'S PATIO
SUITE
(18’-0” x 15’-0”)
Question on
Oversized Island,
GREAT
ROOM Double sinks in Bath 2,
(19’-6” x 15’-0”)
Hall ceiling

OWNER'S
BATH
VEST

10’ GARAGE DOOR




DINING
(19’-6” x 9’-0”)

WIC WIC




STUDY
(11’-6” x 11’-0”) HALL

KITCHEN
PANT.




PWDR.
BEDROOM 3 RV GARAGE
(11’-6” x 10’-0”) (15’-6” x 50’-0”)
COAT


(10’-6” x 13’-6”)


FOYER LAUN.



HALL

BATH 2


LIN.


3-BAY
COVERED TANDEM
ENTRY
GARAGE
(19’-6” x 20’-0”)

BEDROOM 2
(11’-6” x 10’-0”)




3315 N. 197th Lane | Buckeye, AZ 85396 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. . y Copyright © 2019 Lennar Corporation. All grights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar
logo, Everything’s Included, the Everything’s Included logo, NextGen and the NextGen logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 1.11.21
Page 293
Destiny Explorer| Plan 5583 | Approx. 2,584 sq. ft.
4 Bedrooms | 3 Baths | 2-Bay Garage | RV Garage
at Arroyo Seco Main Home 1,910 sq. ft. | Private Living Suite 674 sq. ft.
Elevation Renderings

PRELIMINARY




Elevation L




Elevation B Elevation H



Asante 6




3315 N. 197th Lane | Buckeye, AZ 85396 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 294
Destiny Explorer| Plan 5583 | Approx. 2,584 sq. ft.
4 Bedrooms | 3 Baths | 2-Bay Garage | RV Garage
at Arroyo Seco Main Home 1,910 sq. ft. | Private Living Suite 674 sq. ft.
Elevation Renderings

PRELIMINARY

New CAD
COVERED PATIO BEDROOM 2
for Arroyo Seco OWNER'S SUITE
14'-6" x 14'-6"
12'-8" x 11'-4"



and Asante 6

GREAT ROOM HALL
19'-6" x 21'-4"

BATH 2


OWNER'S
BATH
DINING
10'-0" x 13'-0"
BEDROOM 3
12'-8" x 11'-2"




W.I.C.




KITCHEN

KITCHEN PRIVATE BEDROOM W.I.C.
11'-6" x 11'-10"
RV GARAGE
18'-4" x 42'-10"

PANT.


LAUNDRY



PRIVATE LIVING SUITE PRIVATE BATH
16'-4" x 22'-0"
FOYER
1-CAR GARAGE
12'-2" x 22'-0"




OPT. GOURMET KITCHEN
AT PRIVATE LIVING SUITE COVERED
ENTRY




PRIVATE LIVING SUITE
16'-4" x 22'-0"




1-CAR GARAGE
18'-10" x 10'-10"




3315 N. 197th Lane | Buckeye, AZ 85396 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. . y Copyright © 2019 Lennar Corporation. All grights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar
logo, Everything’s Included, the Everything’s Included logo, NextGen and the NextGen logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 1.11.21
Page 295
Freedom at Heritage Asante
Wayfarer | Plan 5679 | Approx. 2,231 sq. ft.
3 Bedrooms | Study | 3 Baths | 3-Bay Tandem Garage | RV Garage

PRELIMINARY




Elevation D




Elevation B Elevation C

Rolls from
Existing Asante RV 70s
Freedom Series

Heritage Parcel 6 | 16433 W. Alameda Rd. | Surprise | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Pursuant to the Fair Housing Act, this housing is intended for occupancy by at least one person 55 years of g
age or older per home. Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and
may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations without
prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air” or “finished
area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate
certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home and
may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2020 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar
logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 12.18.20
Page 296
Freedom at Heritage Asante
Wayfarer | Plan 5679 | Approx. 2,231 sq. ft.
3 Bedrooms | Study | 3 Baths | 3-Bay Tandem Garage | RV Garage

PRELIMINARY




Rolls from OWNER’S
SUITE GREAT
Existing Asante RV 70s ROOM COVERED
15’-0” x 15’-0”
15’-0” x 17’-0” PATIO
Freedom Series




10’ GARAGE DOOR OWNER’S

BATH
DINING
ROOM
12’-6” x 13’-1”




KITCHEN
RV GARAGE
15’-8” x 48’-1” WIC PANTRY
16’ CLG
STUDY
12’-5” x 12’-6”



BATH 3




LINEN
COATS




LAUNDRY
HALL

BEDROOM 3
12’-5” x 10’-2”



3-BAY
TANDEM GARAGE
19’-10” x 33’-0”/20‘-10”
10’ CLG
BATH 2
FOYER



WIC
14’ GARAGE DOOR




COVERED
ENTRY BEDROOM
8’ GARAGE DOOR
SUITE 2
12’-1” x 11’-4”




Heritage Parcel 6 | 16433 W. Alameda Rd. | Surprise | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 297
Freedom at Heritage Asante
Outlander | Plan 5680 | Approx. 2,406 sq. ft.
3 Bedrooms | Study | 2.5 Baths | 3-Bay Tandem Garage | RV Garage

PRELIMINARY




Elevation C




Elevation B Elevation D

Rolls from
Existing Asante RV 70s
Freedom Series

Heritage Parcel 6 | 16433 W. Alameda Rd. | Surprise | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Pursuant to the Fair Housing Act, this housing is intended for occupancy by at least one person 55 years of g
age or older per home. Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and
may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations without
prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air” or “finished
area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate
certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home and
may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2020 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar
logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 12.18.20
Page 298
Freedom at Heritage Asante
Outlander | Plan 5680 | Approx. 2,406 sq. ft.
3 Bedrooms | Study | 2.5 Baths | 3-Bay Tandem Garage | RV Garage

PRELIMINARY


Rolls from
Existing Asante RV 70s
OWNER’S COVERED PATIO Freedom Series
SUITE
19’-4” x 15’-0”




GREAT
ROOM
19’-6” x 12’-4”


OWNER’S
BATH
10’ GARAGE DOOR

NOOK
19’-6” x 12’-0”

WIC
WIC




STUDY
BEDROOM
11’-8” x 11’-2” 4
11’-8” x 11’-2”
KITCHEN
19’-6” x 12’-0”



RV GARAGE
PWDR 15’-8” x 48’-1”
BEDROOM 3 16’ CLG
12’-0” x 10’-4”
COATS

FOYER

LAUNDRY




BATH 2


LINEN
3-BAY
TANDEM GARAGE
19’-10” x 19’-11”/29’-7”
COVERED 10’ CLG
ENTRY 14’ GARAGE DOOR
BEDROOM 2
11’-8” x 10’-4”




8’ GARAGE DOOR




Heritage Parcel 6 | 16433 W. Alameda Rd. | Surprise | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 299
Freedom at Heritage Asante
Explorer| Plan 5583 | Approx. 2,584 sq. ft. | 4 Bedrooms | 3 Baths | 2-Bay Garage | RV Garage
Main Home 1,910 sq. ft. | Private Living Suite 674 sq. ft.

PRELIMINARY




Elevation L




Elevation B Elevation H




Heritage Parcel 6 | 16433 W. Alameda Rd. | Surprise | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Pursuant to the Fair Housing Act, this housing is intended for occupancy by at least one person 55 years of g
age or older per home. Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and
may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations without
prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air” or “finished
area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to indicate
certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home and
may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2020 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar
logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 12.18.20
Page 300
Freedom at Heritage Asante
Explorer| Plan 5583 | Approx. 2,584 sq. ft. | 4 Bedrooms | 3 Baths | 2-Bay Garage | RV Garage
Main Home 1,910 sq. ft. | Private Living Suite 674 sq. ft.

PRELIMINARY




COVERED PATIO BEDROOM 2
12'-8" x 11'-4"
OWNER'S SUITE
14'-6" x 14'-6"




GREAT ROOM HALL
19'-6" x 21'-4"

BATH 2


OWNER'S
BATH
DINING
10'-0" x 13'-0"
BEDROOM 3
12'-8" x 11'-2"




W.I.C.




KITCHEN

KITCHEN PRIVATE BEDROOM W.I.C.
11'-6" x 11'-10"
RV GARAGE
18'-4" x 42'-10"

PANT.


LAUNDRY



PRIVATE LIVING SUITE PRIVATE BATH
16'-4" x 22'-0"
FOYER
1-CAR GARAGE
12'-2" x 22'-0"




OPT. GOURMET KITCHEN
AT PRIVATE LIVING SUITE COVERED
ENTRY




PRIVATE LIVING SUITE
16'-4" x 22'-0"




1-CAR GARAGE
18'-10" x 10'-10"




Heritage Parcel 6 | 16433 W. Alameda Rd. | Surprise | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 301
Destiny Explorer | Plan 5583 | Approx. 2,604 sq. ft.
4 Bedrooms | 3 Baths | 2-Bay Garage | RV Garage
Dobbins Village Main Home 1,936 sq. ft. | Private Living Suite 668 sq. ft.
Elevation Renderings
PRELIMINARY




Elevation C | Craftsman




Elevation A | Spanish Colonial Elevation I | Western Territorial



New for Dobbins Village




4106 West La Mirada Dr. | Laveen, AZ 85339 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 302
Destiny Explorer | Plan 5583 | Approx. 2,604 sq. ft.
4 Bedrooms | 3 Baths | 2-Bay Garage | RV Garage
Dobbins Village Main Home 1,936 sq. ft. | Private Living Suite 668 sq. ft.
Floorplans
PRELIMINARY




Covered Patio
Bedroom 2
Owner's Suite 12'-9" X 11'-4"
14'-7" X 14'-7"




Dining Bath 2
Owner's 10'-2" X 15'-4"
Bath
Great Room
14'-0" X 19'-6" Bedroom 3
12'-9" X 11'-2"


Walk In Closet

Kitchen
Kitchen
Private Living
Bedroom
Chef Kitchen 11'-7" X 11'-11"
Platinum Option
Laundry Rv Garage

Private Bath
Kitchen

Kitchen
1-Bay Garage

Covered
Private Living Porch
Suite
16'-5" X 13'-3"
Chef Kitchen
Patinum Option
@ Private Living Suite



1-Bay Garage




4106 West La Mirada Dr. | Laveen, AZ 85339 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2021 Lennar Corporation. All grights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar
logo, Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo, NextGen and NextGen logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 1.5.21
Page 303
Inspiration Oxnard | Plan 2016 | Approx. 1,732 sq.ft.
at Horizon 3 Bedroom | 2.5 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Elevation Renderings




Elevation A | Spanish Colonial




Elevation B | Hacienda Elevation C | Craftsman




1882 S. Jesse Place | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 304
Inspiration Oxnard | Plan 2016 | Approx. 1,732 sq.ft.
at Horizon 3 Bedroom | 2.5 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Floorplans




BEDROOM 3
BEDROOM 2 9''-6" X 10'-2"
9''-6" X 11'-4"

2-BAY
GARAGE
19'-4" X 19'-6"




HALL LAUNDRY
BATH 2




LINEN


HALL
W.I.C.
PWDR
HALL
KITCHEN
PANT.


OWNER’S
BATH




DINING OWNERS SUITE
15'-2" X 11'-6" 15'-8" X 14'-2"




SECOND FLOOR
GREAT ROOM
19'-0" X 13'-8"




ENTRY
FRONT PORCH




FIRST FLOOR


1882 S. Jesse Place | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2019 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo,
Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 10.2.19
Page 305
Inspiration Lucia | Plan 2019 | Approx. 1,974 sq.ft.
at Horizon 3 Bedroom | 2.5 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Elevation Renderings




Elevation B | Hacienda




Elevation C | Craftsman Elevation E | Tuscan




1882 S. Jesse Place | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 306
Inspiration Lucia | Plan 2019 | Approx. 1,974 sq.ft.
at Horizon 3 Bedroom | 2.5 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Floorplans




2-BAY BEDROOM 2
9''-7" X 12'-2"
GARAGE BEDROOM 3
9''-7" X 11'-0"
19'-4" X 19'-6"




BATH 2
HALL
ENTRY
KITCHEN
TECH

CENTER PORCH

PWDR
HALL
FIRST FLOOR "E"
LAUNDRY
LINEN HALL


GREAT ROOM
15'-6" X 14'-6" ENTRY

KITCHEN
OWNERS SUITE PORCH
19'-4" X 14'-6"



FIRST FLOOR "C"
DINING
19'-2" X 10'-0"




OWNERS BATH
W.I.C.
ENTRY PANT.


KITCHEN

PORCH




FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR




1882 S. Jesse Place | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2019 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo,
Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 10.2.19
Page 307
Inspiration Windsor | Plan 2020 | Approx. 2,078 sq.ft.
at Horizon 4 Bedroom | 3.5 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Elevation Renderings




Elevation A | Spanish




Elevation B | Hacienda Elevation D | Monterey




1882 S. Jesse Place | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Page 308
Inspiration Windsor | Plan 2020 | Approx. 2,078 sq.ft.
at Horizon 4 Bedroom | 3.5 Bath | 2-Bay Garage
Floorplans




BEDROOM 3
BEDROOM 2 9'-7" X 11'-0"
9'-7" X 12'-2"

2-BAY
GARAGE
19'-4" X 19'-6"
BALCONY M. RETREAT

HALL


BATH 2 SECOND FLOOR “A”


HALL PWDR BATH 3
BEDROOM 4
9'-7" X 11'-0"

ENTRY
KITCHEN

PANT.
FIRST FLOOR “A”


LAUNDRY


DINING
10'-6" X 15'-6" ENTRY

W.I.C. OWNERS BATH FRONT PORCH




FIRST FLOOR "B"

GREAT ROOM
13'-6" X 19'-8" OWNERS SUITE
13'-8" X 14'-2"

W.I.C.




ENTRY
ENTRY BALCONY M. RETREAT
FRONT PORCH BALCONY

FIRST FLOOR

FIRST FLOOR "D" SECOND FLOOR "D"



1882 S. Jesse Place | Chandler, AZ 85286 | 800-864-1058 | Lennar.com
Plans and elevations are artist’s renderings and may contain options which are not standard on all models. Lennar reserves the g right to make changes to these floor plans, specifications, dimensions and elevations
without prior notice. Stated dimensions and square footage are approximate and should not be used as representation of the home’s precise or actual size. Any statement, verbal or written, g regarding “under air”
or “finished area” or any other description or modifier of the square footage size of any home is a shorthand description of the manner in which the square footage was estimated and should not be construed to
indicate certainty. Renderings are conceptual in nature and merely an artist’s rendition. These renderings are solely for illustrative purposes and should never be relied upon. Garage size may vary from home to home
and may not accommodate all vehicles. No offer to sell or lease may be made or to purchase or lease may be accepted prior to issuance of an Arizona Public Report. A Public Report is available at the State Real Estate
Department website www.azre.gov. Broker Lennar Sales Corp. Lennar Arizona, Inc. dba Lennar Homes ROC# 232731, Lennar Arizona Construction, Inc. ROC# 228129, Lennar Communities Development,
Inc., ROC# 137295, US Home of Arizona Construction Company ROC# 065983, y Greystone Construction, Inc. ROC# 256680. y Copyright © 2019 Lennar Corporation. All rights reserved. Lennar, the Lennar logo,
Everything’s Included and the Everything’s Included logo are U.S. registered service marks or service marks of Lennar Corporation and/or its subsidiaries. 10.2.19
Page 309
From: Joanne Fimbres
To: Sarah Stockham
Subject: Fwd: New REZONING Case File: Z-19-G-00-5 Algodón PUD / PCD - Major Amendment - 2nd Submittal (Area
generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue)
Date: Monday, June 28, 2021 12:45:24 PM


Good Afternoon Sarah,

I would like to take this opportunity to submit a comment in support of the Algodon Center
rezoning and proposed plans for the land.

The Pendergast Elementary School District is in support of the proposed residential plans for
the development of these parcels. Our District is a great partner in working closely with the
The rezoning and development of this land will provide the growth and stimulation of this
community and those surrounding it. As an educational partner, we look forward to
welcoming the families that will reside in the proposed homes (single and multi-family). As s
continued supporter, we look forward to future communication, rezoning approval, and
collaboration between our District and the City of Phoenix.


Thank you,


Joanne Fimbres, MBA

Chief Financial Officer
3802 N. 91st Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85037
Office - (623) 772-2220
Fax - (623)877-3717
jfimbres@pesd92.org




[pesd92.org]

- Stay connected -



[facebook.com] [twitter.com] [youtube.com] [instagram.com]



This email (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is

intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you have received this

email in error, please immediately notify the person named above by reply email, and then delete the

original email.

Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defects that might




Page 310
Attachment C




ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5
January 12, 2022

Maryvale Village Planning January 12, 2021
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 3, 2021
Request From: PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development,
Planned Community District) (672.92 acres)
Request To: PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development,
Planned Community District) (672.92 acres)
Proposed Use: Major amendment to Algodón Center PUD to
allow single-family and multifamily residential
Location: Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to
99th Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell
Avenue
Owner: John F Long Properties LLLP, et al.
Applicant/Representative: Stephen Anderson, Gammage & Burnham PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

The purpose of this addendum is to revise the staff recommended stipulations, as
requested by the applicant, to modify language pertaining to the landscape setback
standards for single-family residential developments and pedestrian pathways for
multifamily and commercial developments to provide additional clarity. The proposed
changes to Stipulation No. 1.d refine the landscape setback standards around single-
family residential developments adjacent to perimeter streets. Stipulation No. 6,
originally provided by the Public Transit Department, was updated to require contrasting
pavement treatment/s where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles only for multifamily
and commercial developments. This requested change has been approved the Public
Transit Department.

Staff recommends approval per the modified stipulations below:

Stipulations

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Algodón Centre PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped December 29, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:


Page 311
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-19-G-00-5
January 12, 2022


a. Front cover: Revise the date information on the cover page to add the
following:


b. Page 15, Table 3A, Streetscape Section, Item 1: Rename section to
“Landscape Setback” and delete “measured from back of curb” from first
sentence.


c. Page 15, Table 3A, Low Density Residential Sidewalks Section: Update
the first sentence to read “For any residential parcel where density is less
than 20 dwelling units per gross acres, sidewalks shall be a minimum of
five feet wide, and shall be separated from the curb per the requirements
of the Street Classification Map with a minimum five foot wide landscape
strip.

d. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 1: Rename section to
“Landscape Setback”, delete “measured from back of curb” from first
sentence AND ADD “PERIMETER” BEFORE “PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
STREET FRONTAGES”.

e. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 2, Bullet Point 1: Add “and
utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

f. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 2, Bullet Point 2: Add “and
utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

g. Page 18, Table 3B, Perimeter Adjacent to Loop 101 Section, Item 2,
Bullet Point 1: Add “and utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

h. Page 18, Table 3B, Perimeter Adjacent to Loop 101 Section, Item 2,
Bullet Point 2: Add “and utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

2. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and ensure bus stop pad(s) at the
following locations, with final siting to be approved by the Public Transit
Department:

a. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Earl Drive alignment.

b. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Osborn Road alignment.

c. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Clarendon Avenue alignment.

d. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Glenrosa Avenue alignment.

e. Southbound 91st Avenue south of Osborn Road alignment.

Page 312
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-19-G-00-5
January 12, 2022



f. Southbound 91st Avenue south of Cheery Lynn Road alignment.

g. Westbound Thomas Road at approximately 9700 West Thomas Road.

3. Bus stop pads shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pad shall be spaced from the
intersection according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall be
placed to provide 50% shade coverage to bus stop pad at full maturity.

4. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and ensure bus bay with bus stop pad
at the following locations, final siting to be approved by the Public Transit
Department:

a. Northbound 99th Avenue north of Thomas Road.

b. Northbound 99th Avenue north of Indian School Road.

5. Bus bays shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1256; attached bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1261 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus bay and attached
bus stop pad shall be spaced from the intersections according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall be placed to provide 50% shade coverage to
bus stop pad at full maturity.

6. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles FOR MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS, they shall be constructed
of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances, bus stop, and public sidewalks, using the most direct route for
pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. An updated Master Street Plan showing all public arterial and collector streets
shall be submitted to the Street Transportation Department and Planning and
Development Department for review and approval, prior to preliminary site plan
approval.

9. The Developer shall submit an updated Traffic Impact Study to the Street
Transportation Department prior to preliminary site plan approval for the first
phase of development permitted by Amendment G of the Algodón PUD. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and
approved. The applicant shall be responsible for any dedications and required
improvements as recommended by the approved study and as approved by the
Planning and Development and Street Transportation Department.

Page 313
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-19-G-00-5
January 12, 2022



10. The applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project Information Form
for the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to Mr. Alan Hilty, (602)262-
6193, with the Street Transportation Department. This form is a requirement of
the EPA to meet clean air quality requirements.

11. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

12. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.




Page 314
Attachment D




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-19-G-00-5
INFORMATION ONLY


Date of VPC Meeting July 14, 2021
Request From PUD PCD
Request To PUD PCD
Proposed Use Major Amendment to the Algodón Center PUD to allow
single-family and multifamily residential
Location An area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th
Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue


VPC DISCUSSION:

Item Nos. 7 (GPA-MV-1-21-5) and 8 (Z-19-G-00-5) are companion cases and were
heard together.

Stephen Anderson, representing the applicant with Gammage & Burnham, reviewed
the project boundaries and proposed changes to the General Plan Land Use Map,
Housing Phoenix Plan goals, proposed projects within the PUD boundaries showing
aerial images and site plans, projected rent and sale prices, mortgage and rent
assistance programs by the proposed builders, and discussed a potential timeline for
recommendation and their completed community outreach to date.

Ken DuBose shared surprise at the request by the property owner (John F. Long),
stating that the prices were not affordable, a one-bedroom for rent for $1400 is not
affordable for residents in the area and while the market is generating a lot of housing,
none of it is very affordable. Mr. DuBose concluded that he was surprised John F. Long
did not have any affordable housing incorporated with this request.

Mike Weber shared that it was a shame that the medical campus is not going into the
PUD boundaries, the proposal should still have space for retail, there is still an issue
with water out in the area and if the applicant could help involve the City Council to get
the light rail to extend near the subject site. Mr. Anderson responded that the City is
doing water extensions throughout the developed part of the city, replacing farming with
housing substantially reduces water consumption and he does not know what Valley
Metro plans to do after the light rail gets extended on the I-10 freeway, but there might
be a ballot measure (Prop. 500) which would add a 25-cent sales tax for transit.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 315
Sandra Oviedo shared that there are many high-density living spaces in the area but
office space is important so that people in the Village can commute closer to where they
live, and that is important for people to live, work, shop and play at the subject site.

Jeff O’Toole stated that Algodón is the last large employment corridor in west Phoenix,
it was shocking that the most creative option for this site is to put more houses on it, a
few years ago the PUD boundary was amended to add houses and that was supposed
to be the last request for housing, and that it is also a failure of the Community and
Economic Development Department, and that he would like to see a proposal that is
more mixed-use. Mr. Anderson replied that the site has been out there for 20 years,
they have asked the City to work with the property owner to add more commercial uses,
this site is not important to CED and showed the committee over economic
development sites within the city and reviewed previous proposals for economic
development on the site and why those deals did not come to fruition.

Sandra Oviedo stated that while she did not know there were plans to place a water
park on the site at one point in time, it would be beneficial to have jobs and some sort of
attraction on the site and that Maryvale residents have to go outside of the area to work,
they should be able to work in Maryvale too.

Chair Gene Derie shared that having been on the committee for 13 years, he has
heard discussions of the various commercial proposals for the site such as Ikea or the
stadium, and that while he is not happy with the Community and Economic
Development Department he is not a fan of this proposal for housing and that there has
been many new housing developments approved in the area which would also
contribute to the Housing Phoenix Plan goal, and he was sorry to see the original dream
of John F. Long to have an economic corridor on the site change. Mr. Anderson replied
that is was pure accident that the Tohono O’odham acquired the land north of the
stadium for the casino, and that the City of Goodyear used a GPLET proposal for the
medical office park and cancer treatment center.

Ken DuBose shared that while the City needs more economic development tools, there
are many housing developments being approved, Maryvale is being over-run with all the
new housing developments and isn’t in the discussion for the light rail extension.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 316
Attachment E




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-19-G-00-5



Date of VPC Meeting January 12, 2022
Request From PUD PCD
Request To PUD PCD
Proposed Use Major Amendment to the Algodón Center PUD to allow
single-family and multifamily residential
Location An area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th
Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell Avenue
VPC Recommendation Denial
VPC Vote 6-3


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Items 6 (GPA-MV-1-21-5) and 7 (Z-19-G-00-5) are companion cases and were heard
together.

Sarah Stockham, staff, provided an overview of the requests, noting the location and
the history of the site. Ms. Stockham displayed a map of the current and proposed
General Plan Land Use Map designations, and staff’s findings. Ms. Stockham displayed
an aerial map, a conceptual site plan and elevations, and reviewed the surrounding land
uses, the proposal, staff’s recommendation, and stipulations.

Stephen Anderson, representing the applicant with Gammage & Burnham, reviewed
the proposed developments within the Algodón Center PUD area sharing that by 2023
the proposal will add around 4,000 jobs and 2,400 housing units, they had an extensive
mailing list and hosted two neighborhood meetings, and the proposed PUD major
amendment has gone through a thorough review with city staff. Mr. Anderson reviewed
the proposed mix of housing types with estimated pricing, detailed the five-acre central
amenity area in the development and shared that they have been asked to construct
bicycle lanes along Indian School Road, they will be constructing a sewer lift station,
and that converting agricultural land to housing uses less water. Mr. Anderson added
that the Pendergast School District is excited for the proposal they will construct 93rd
Avenue (which runs along the south side of the school), the proposal is below the
density limits for their comparative zoning districts, they are providing three times the
amount of open space than what would be required in the Zoning Ordinance, and their
PUD standards require detached sidewalks, enhanced shading standard and design
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 317
review, in addition to providing 50% shade for the bus stops and bus infrastructure they
are required to provide in stipulation Nos. 3 through 5. Mr. Anderson concluded that this
proposal would add around 2,500 housing units in a wide variety of housing types, and
the proposal preserves approximately 200 acres for commercial development which will
add to the job opportunities in the area.

Questions from the Committee:
Saundra Cole asked if the jobs will be high-paying or low-paying. Mr. Anderson replied
that he thinks they will be high paying jobs, there is a critical labor shortage and there
are a lot of budding businesses in the area and there is data showing wage pressure
which is causing higher wages and the entry-level minimum wage is also increasing.

Sandra Oviedo asked what type of corporate buildings would be constructed in the
PUD area. Mr. Anderson replied that he does not know, LGE is under contract for 90
days to purchase land in the PUD area to construct commercial buildings and showed
LGE’s website and examples of their past projects. Ms. Oviedo shared that is nice to
see the corporate building examples and shared a desire to see more white-collar jobs
in the area rather than big-box retail.

Mike Weber shared that it is nice to see some areas devoted to businesses going into
the PUD area and that it is not all housing, and that along the freeway the PUD allows
for higher height limits. Mr. Anderson replied that yes, the PUD has always allowed high
height limits and they are not proposing to change that, and that the applicant did
provide a noise study which calls for over-height walls along the freeway when adjacent
to residential homes.

Jeff O’Toole thanked John F. Long for all the investment in Maryvale, shared that he
liked the mix of housing types which brings in a diversity of residents, recognized that
there is a housing crisis but there is also an employment crisis, which leads to longer
commutes and increased traffic, and that while the proposal shows very nice housing
with great open space, this is the last area to make an employment center in the West
Valley, and it is hard to argue that housing is the highest and best use for this area
along the freeway. Mr. O’Toole added that it is a failure of the Community and
Economic Development Department to make the employment center a reality, the
renderings of the commercial buildings are nice but not guaranteed, in 2018 John F.
Long promised that they would not come back to amend the PUD again to allow any
more housing and that this proposal is too much housing, they already have around
2,800 units approved in the area.

Joe Barba asked the applicant to provide some statistics on jobs created and the
economic impact of this proposal. Mr. Anderson replied that he can send that to staff.

Sandra Oviedo agreed with committee member O’Toole’s comments, shared that the
area should be a self-sufficient community where people can live, work and play in the
same area, asked the applicant to elaborate on the bike lanes and if they would
consider a park-and-ride at this site. Mr. Anderson replied that the light rail is not
proposed to extend near this area, they will be installing painted bike lanes along the
arterial streets, they area stipulated to install bus bays and bus stops which will be
shaded to 50%, there is a lot of multimodal access on the site, the Public Transit
Department did not ask for a park-and-ride at this location, and they will be adding an
additional vehicular lane along Indian School Road in addition to the painted bike lanes,
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 318
which are not curb or parking separated. Ms. Oviedo asked how crossing will happen
along the major streets and what pedestrian amenities will be provided. Mr. Anderson
replied that they are required to install five traffic signals, which is where the crossings
will occur.

Jeff O’Toole asked if the proposed housing development will be gated and how far
north does the third lane along 99th Avenue extend to. Mr. Anderson replied that yes,
the community will be gated, the private streets and amenity areas will be maintained by
the HOA, the school buses will have access through the gates, and that the travel lane
will extend to Campbell Avenue which is the northern border of the subject site, and that
there is a SRP well at 99th Avenue and Campbell Avenue and a SRP ditch, the City of
Avondale is in charge of the west side of the street and the improvements will be shifted
east. Mr. O’Toole added that going down to two lanes along 99th Avenue in conjunction
with not having a dedicated right-turn lane onto Camelback Road creates significant
traffic congestion concerns. Mr. Anderson replied that they are only required to improve
the street along the subject site which ends at Campbell Avenue, but the other concerns
can be shared with the Street Transportation Department.

Zeke Valenzuela asked how long it would be until the subject site reached 60%-70%
completion. Mr. Anderson replied that full build out would be around a decade, the
commercial buildings would develop faster and that 60%-70% completion might be
within five years.

Sandra Oviedo shared that it would be nice to see a self-sufficient community where
people play, shop and live in the area, and that the crossings can be dangerous at the
surrounding intersections.

Chair Gene Derie shared that the Algodón Center PUD PCD has been around for 20
years, was meant to be a major employment and economic center, there are roughly
2,600 housing units entitled or being built in the surrounding area, half of which are on
the west side of 99th Avenue between Indian School Road and Thomas Road and
asked what the plan was for the parcel at the northwest corner of 99th Avenue and
Indian School Road. Tim Wright, with John F. Long Properties replied that the site in
Avondale was sold to Fulton homes. Chair Gene Derie continued that there are several
housing developments proposed in the area, citing 99th Avenue and Camelback Road
by the charter school (267 units), 99th Avenue and Indian School Road (228 units),
111th Avenue and Camelback Road (194 units), east of Loop 101 near 95th Avenue
and Indian School Road (501 units) and around 1,300 units in Avondale near 104th
Avenue and Indian School Road. Chair Gene Derie added that he liked what is
proposed on the east side of the freeway, but not what is proposed west of the freeway,
concluding that the PUD was supposed to be the economic engine of Maryvale.

Sandra Oviedo asked the applicant to clarify what the vocational campus is as depicted
in the PUD area. Mr. Anderson replied that the West MEC campus is around 30-acres,
it stands for the Western Maricopa Education Center, it provides vocation education in
many fields such as healthcare, welding, aviation maintenance. Ms. Oviedo responded
that the campus is a great addition, there is a need for more places like that in addition
to access to healthy food.

Joe Barba asked if the Chair’s concerns with the proposal was that it was too much
housing. Chair Gene Derie replied affirmatively, sharing that there are many housing
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 319
units planned for the area. Joe Barba replied that there are many people moving to
Phoenix, and this is an opportunity to bring them to Maryvale, the population is going to
increase significantly by 2030, they shouldn’t paint too much housing as a bad thing,
and that there is a huge need for housing.

Sandra Oviedo shared that there should be both housing and commercial uses in the
community where people can work, live and play in the same area.

Joe Barba shared that he is not disagreeing with committee member Oviedo, and that
the people who are moving to the area are going into areas like Buckeye and then must
commute to their jobs, which will contribute to congestion.

Ken DuBose shared that he has lived in the area for 35 years, they are surrounded by
a residential area, traffic is inevitable with growth, it is disappointing to see the City of
Phoenix which has an affordable housing plan to not do some affordable housing at this
site, this is the last largest land mass in Maryvale and the committee should be careful
with this request, and that he wants to see more affordable housing and senior housing
in the Village. Mr. Dubose added that the income needed for a one-bedroom in this
proposal is $56,000, a schoolteacher does not make that amount, which confirms the
need for affordable housing. Mr. DuBose asked the applicant to explain how they came
up with the income needed for the housing units in the proposal. Mr. Anderson replied
that the income calculations came from mortgage financing for the homes, and they
have talked to the Housing Department about the project site potentially being within an
employee-assisted program where employers help get their employees housing, and
that the Housing Department does not have funds for that sort of program, but they
know that the developer is interested in being involved if that program was ever created.

Jeff O’Toole shared that he agreed with committee member Barba’s comments and
there is a desire to draw talent to the area, but if nothing but housing is built on land
available for commercial uses, they will miss the opportunity to have more places for
people to work in the Village and to have more retail spaces. Mr. O’Toole concluded
that he might be more amenable to the proposal if the housing to commercial land use
ratio was closer to 50/50. Mr. Anderson replied that the proposal is 58% residential and
42% commercial, and asked Mr. David Sellers with LGE Design Group to share about
their plans for the commercial areas of the PUD. David Sellers, with LGE Design
Group, shared that the two parcels within the PUD are incredible pieces of land, having
housing nearby their planned commercial properties is a benefit to the employers, the
buildings will be very nice and will draw in high-paying jobs, and that while they haven’t
closed on the property yet they have the capital for the projects, they are a vertically-
integrated, they like the freeway visibility and that commercial tenants will see housing
nearby as an asset.

Sandra Oviedo asked if there are any long-term projects for when the community ages.
Mr. Anderson replied they do not have any age-restricted projects proposed on the site,
and that the area could accommodate the Next Gen style of development that Lennar
offers.

Chair Gene Derie commented that John F. Long’s dream for the Algodón Center PUD
PCD was to have an employment center in Maryvale because they had already built
enough housing, churches and schools in the Village.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 320
Public Comment:
None.

Item No. 7 Z-19-G-00-5
Motion:
Sandra Oviedo motioned to recommend approval of Z-19-G-00-5 per Addendum A.
Joe Barba seconded the motion.

Vote:
3-6, Motion to approve fails, with Committee Members Barba, Oviedo, and Valenzuela
in favor and committee members Battle, Cole, DuBose, O’Toole, Weber, and Derie
opposed.

Motion:
Jeff O’Toole motioned to recommend denial of Z-19-G-00-5. Mike Weber seconded
the motion

Discussion:
Mike Weber stated that the area needs more jobs and not more houses.

Vote:
6-3, Motion to deny passes, with Committee Members Battle, Cole, DuBose, O’Toole,
Weber, and Derie in favor and committee members Barba, Oviedo, and Valenzuela
opposed.




STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 321
Attachment F


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 3, 2022

ITEM NO: 3
DISTRICT NO.: 5
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodon Center PUD)
Location: Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas Road to
Campbell Avenue
From: PUD PCD
To: PUD PCD
Acreage: 672.92
Proposal: Major amendment to Algodon Center PUD to allow single-family and
multifamily residential.
Applicant: Gammage & Burnham PLC, Stephen Anderson
Owner: John F Long Properties LLLP, et al.
Representative: Gammage & Burnham PLC, Stephen Anderson

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Maryvale 7/14/2021 Information only.
Maryvale 1/12/2022 Denial. Vote: 6-3.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Continued to March 3, 2022 Planning Commission
hearing, without fee.

Motion Discussion: To the allow the applicant to have additional time to make updates to the
plan.

Motion details: Commissioner McCabe made a MOTION to continue Z-19-G-00-5 to the March
3, 2022 Planning Commission hearing, without fee.

Maker: McCabe
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 8-0
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.






Page 322
Attachment G




ADDENDUM B
Staff Report: Z-19-G-00-5
March 3, 2022

Maryvale Village Planning January 12, 2022
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 3, 2022 (Continued to March 3, 2022)
March 3, 2022
Request From: PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development,
Planned Community District) (672.92 acres)
Request To: PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development,
Planned Community District) (672.92 acres)
Proposed Use: Major amendment to Algodón Center PUD to
allow single-family and multifamily residential
Location: Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to
99th Avenue, Thomas Road to Campbell
Avenue
Owner: John F Long Properties LLLP, et al.
Applicant/Representative: Stephen Anderson, Gammage & Burnham PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

The purpose of this addendum is to revise the staff recommended stipulations, as
requested by the applicant, to modify language pertaining to the allowable acreage for
single-family residential developments and low-density multifamily residential
developments to accommodate a change to the corresponding General Plan
Amendment No. GPA-MV-1-21-5 and to add the standard waiver of claims stipulation.
Also attached is one letter of support received since the last addendum.

The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this request on January 12, 2022, and
recommended denial by a 6-3 vote. The Planning Commission voted unanimously (8-0)
on February 3, 2022, to continue this case to the March 3, 2022 hearing to allow the
applicant additional time to make changes to the proposal. The applicant proposes to
modify their concurrent General Plan Amendment request to allow for approximately 22
acres of the subject site to remain designated as Mixed-Use (Commercial/Industrial) on
the General Plan Land Use Map and to reduce the acreage in the PUD that allows the
development of single-family and low-density multifamily residences.

The proposed change to Stipulation No. 1.b reduces the amount of acreage within the
PUD where single-family residential and low-density multifamily residential uses may
occur. The proposed PUD currently limits the allowable acreage where low-density
residential development can occur by implementing an acreage limit, a unit maximum,


Page 323
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-19-G-00-5
March 3, 2022


and the use must occur on areas designated as Residential on the General Plan Land
Use Map. Stipulation No. 13 is the standard waiver of claims stipulation.
Staff recommends approval per the modified stipulations below:

Stipulations

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Algodón Centre PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped December 29, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the date information on the cover page to add the
following:


B. PAGE 9, TABLE 1, RESIDENTIAL USE, BULLET POINT 2: AMEND
THE SENTENCE TO READ “A MAXIMUM OF 326.75 GROSS ACRES
OF THE TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA OF THE PUD SHALL BE USED
FOR RESIDENTIAL USES OF LESS THAN 20 DU/AC.”

b. c. Page 15, Table 3A, Streetscape Section, Item 1: Rename section to
“Landscape Setback” and delete “measured from back of curb” from first
sentence.

c. d. Page 15, Table 3A, Low Density Residential Sidewalks Section: Update
the first sentence to read “For any residential parcel where density is less
than 20 dwelling units per gross acres, sidewalks shall be a minimum of
five feet wide, and shall be separated from the curb per the requirements
of the Street Classification Map with a minimum five foot wide landscape
strip.

d. e. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 1: Rename section to
“Landscape Setback”, delete “measured from back of curb” from first
sentence AND ADD “PERIMETER” BEFORE “PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
STREET FRONTAGES”.

e. f. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 2, Bullet Point 1: Add “and
utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

f. g. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 2, Bullet Point 2: Add “and
utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

g. h. Page 18, Table 3B, Perimeter Adjacent to Loop 101 Section, Item 2,
Bullet Point 1: Add “and utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

Page 324
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-19-G-00-5
March 3, 2022



h. i. Page 18, Table 3B, Perimeter Adjacent to Loop 101 Section, Item 2,
Bullet Point 2: Add “and utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

2. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and ensure bus stop pad(s) at the
following locations, with final siting to be approved by the Public Transit
Department:

a. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Earl Drive alignment.

b. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Osborn Road alignment.

c. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Clarendon Avenue alignment.

d. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Glenrosa Avenue alignment.

e. Southbound 91st Avenue south of Osborn Road alignment.

f. Southbound 91st Avenue south of Cheery Lynn Road alignment.

g. Westbound Thomas Road at approximately 9700 West Thomas Road.

3. Bus stop pads shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pad shall be spaced from the
intersection according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall be
placed to provide 50% shade coverage to bus stop pad at full maturity.

4. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and ensure bus bay with bus stop pad
at the following locations, final siting to be approved by the Public Transit
Department:

a. Northbound 99th Avenue north of Thomas Road.

b. Northbound 99th Avenue north of Indian School Road.

5. Bus bays shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1256; attached bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1261 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus bay and attached
bus stop pad shall be spaced from the intersections according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall be placed to provide 50% shade coverage to
bus stop pad at full maturity.

6. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles FOR MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS, they shall be constructed
of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

Page 325
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-19-G-00-5
March 3, 2022



7. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances, bus stop, and public sidewalks, using the most direct route for
pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. An updated Master Street Plan showing all public arterial and collector streets
shall be submitted to the Street Transportation Department and Planning and
Development Department for review and approval, prior to preliminary site plan
approval.

9. The Developer shall submit an updated Traffic Impact Study to the Street
Transportation Department prior to preliminary site plan approval for the first
phase of development permitted by Amendment G of the Algodón PUD. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and
approved. The applicant shall be responsible for any dedications and required
improvements as recommended by the approved study and as approved by the
Planning and Development and Street Transportation Department.

10. The applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project Information Form
for the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to Mr. Alan Hilty, (602)262-
6193, with the Street Transportation Department. This form is a requirement of
the EPA to meet clean air quality requirements.

11. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

12. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

13. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS IN A FORM
APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. THE WAIVER SHALL BE
RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD


Exhibits
Algodón Center PUD date stamped December 29, 2021
Correspondence



Page 326
Date: February 2, 2022

Tim Wright
John F. Long Properties
1118 E. Missouri Ave, Suite A
Phoenix, AZ 85014

Re: Algodon Center PUD


Banner Health has been a supporter of growth in the greater Phoenix area for as long as we
have been caring for the community. The proposed modifications proposed by John F. Long
in conjunction with efforts by Gammage & Burnham for the Algodon Center will bring
residential and commercial growth to the west valley. We support the proposed changes
described in the Major Amendment & Minor General Amendment by John F. Long. Please
feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns.


Sincerely,


Aaron Zeligman
Sr. Project Executive
Aaron.Zeligman@bannerhealth.com
(602) 989-4713




Page 327
Attachment H


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 3, 2022
REVISED

ITEM NO: 4
DISTRICT NO.: 5
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-19-G-00-5 (Algodón PUD) (Companion Case GPA-MV-1-21-5)
Location: Area generally bounded by 91st Avenue to 99th Avenue, Thomas Road to
Campbell Avenue
From: PUD PCD
To: PUD PCD
Acreage: 672.92
Proposal: Major amendment to Algodón Center PUD to allow single-family and
multifamily residential.
Applicant: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Owner: John F. Long Properties LLLP, et al.
Representative: Stephen W. Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum B Staff Report.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Maryvale 7/14/2021 Information only.
Maryvale 1/12/2022 Denial. Vote: 6-3.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum B Staff Report.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Gaynor made a MOTION to approve Z-19-G-00-5, per the
Addendum B Staff Report.

Maker: Gaynor
Second: McCabe
Vote: 6-1 (Bushing)
Absent: Gorraiz
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposal will redevelop an underutilized property and provide a high quality
residential development which will help alleviate the housing shortage in Phoenix.

2. This proposal provides for additional housing options in the Maryvale Village and
contributes to the balance of housing and employment opportunities within a Major
Employment Center.

3. The proposal includes several development standards that exceed conventional Zoning
Ordinance standards such as increased open space, design and shading standards.


Page 328
Stipulations:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Algodón Centre PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and Development
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The updated
Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development Narrative date
stamped December 29, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the date information on the cover page to add the following:


B. PAGE 9, TABLE 1, RESIDENTIAL USE, BULLET POINT 2: AMEND THE
SENTENCE TO READ “A MAXIMUM OF 326.75 GROSS ACRES OF THE
TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA OF THE PUD SHALL BE USED FOR
RESIDENTIAL USES OF LESS THAN 20 DU/AC.”

b. c. Page 15, Table 3A, Streetscape Section, Item 1: Rename section to “Landscape
Setback” and delete “measured from back of curb” from first sentence.

c. d. Page 15, Table 3A, Low Density Residential Sidewalks Section: Update the first
sentence to read “For any residential parcel where density is less than 20
dwelling units per gross acres, sidewalks shall be a minimum of five feet wide,
and shall be separated from the curb per the requirements of the Street
Classification Map with a minimum five foot wide landscape strip.

d. e. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 1: Rename section to “Landscape
Setback”, delete “measured from back of curb” from first sentence AND ADD
“PERIMETER” BEFORE “PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREET FRONTAGES”.

e. f. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 2, Bullet Point 1: Add “and utility
easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

f. g. Page 17, Table 3B, Streetscape Section, Item 2, Bullet Point 2: Add “and utility
easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

g. h. Page 18, Table 3B, Perimeter Adjacent to Loop 101 Section, Item 2, Bullet Point
1: Add “and utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

h. i. Page 18, Table 3B, Perimeter Adjacent to Loop 101 Section, Item 2, Bullet Point
2: Add “and utility easements” after “utilities” in first sentence.

2. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and ensure bus stop pad(s) at the following
locations, with final siting to be approved by the Public Transit Department:

a. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Earl Drive alignment.

b. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Osborn Road alignment.

c. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Clarendon Avenue alignment.

d. Northbound 99th Avenue north of the Glenrosa Avenue alignment.

e. Southbound 91st Avenue south of Osborn Road alignment.
Page 329
f. Southbound 91st Avenue south of Cheery Lynn Road alignment.

g. Westbound Thomas Road at approximately 9700 West Thomas Road.

3. Bus stop pads shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260
with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pad shall be spaced from the intersection
according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258. Trees shall be placed to provide
50% shade coverage to bus stop pad at full maturity.

4. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and ensure bus bay with bus stop pad at the
following locations, final siting to be approved by the Public Transit Department:

a. Northbound 99th Avenue north of Thomas Road.

b. Northbound 99th Avenue north of Indian School Road.

5. Bus bays shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1256;
attached bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard
Detail P1261 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus bay and attached bus stop pad
shall be spaced from the intersections according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1258. Trees shall be placed to provide 50% shade coverage to bus stop pad at full
maturity.

6. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS, they shall be constructed of decorative
pavers, stamped, or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that visually
contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

7. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect building
entrances, bus stop, and public sidewalks, using the most direct route for pedestrians,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. An updated Master Street Plan showing all public arterial and collector streets shall be
submitted to the Street Transportation Department and Planning and Development
Department for review and approval, prior to preliminary site plan approval.

9. The Developer shall submit an updated Traffic Impact Study to the Street
Transportation Department prior to preliminary site plan approval for the first phase of
development permitted by Amendment G of the Algodón PUD. No preliminary approval
of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and approved. The applicant shall
be responsible for any dedications and required improvements as recommended by the
approved study and as approved by the Planning and Development and Street
Transportation Department.

10. The applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project Information Form for
the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to Mr. Alan Hilty, (602)262-6193, with
the Street Transportation Department. This form is a requirement of the EPA to meet
clean air quality requirements.

11. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping


Page 330
and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

12. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

13. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS IN A FORM APPROVED BY
THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. THE WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE
MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO
BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 331



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO CONTINUE (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** (CONTINUED FROM
MARCH 2, 2022) - Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application
Z-70-21-5 - Approximately 500 Feet South of the Southeast Corner of 75th
Avenue and Camelback Road (Ordinance G-6966)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) to R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) to
allow multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: R1-6
Proposed Zoning: R-3A
Acreage: 6.50
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Owner: Sheri Ranger, Ranger Homes
Applicant: Daryn Murphy, Commonwealth Development
Representative: Rod Jarvis, Earl and Curley, PC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on Jan. 12,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 9-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Feb. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Maryvale Village Planning Committee
recommendation, with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Approximately 500 feet south of the southeast corner of 75th Avenue and Camelback
Road
Council District: 5
Parcel Addresses: 4705 and 4735 N. 75th Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.

Page 332
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT




To: Alan Stephenson Date: March 30, 2022
Deputy City Manager

From: Joshua Bednarek �e
Planning and Deve,opment Deputy Director

Subject: CONTINUANCE OF ITEM 83 ON THE APRIL 6, 2022 FORMAL AGENDA -
ORDINANCE ADOPTION - REZONING APPLICATION - Z-70-21-5 -
LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF 75TH AVENUE AND CAMELBACK ROAD (ORDINANCE G-6966)



Item 83 is a request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map
of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-70-21-5 and rezone the site
from R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) to R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) for a
Multifamily Residential and consider adoption of the Planning Commission recommendation
on February 3, 2022.

The applicant requested the item be continued to the May 11, 2022 Formal Meeting so they
can work with neighbors to address their concerns about the request. This item will be
advertised and posted for a public hearing.

Staff concurs with this request for continuance.




Approved:
Alan Stephenson, De uty City Manager



Attachment:
Exhibit A - Applicant's request for continuance
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-70-21-5) FROM R1-6 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R-3A (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 6.50-acre site located approximately 500

feet south of the southeast corner of 75th Avenue and Camelback Road in a portion

of Section 24, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in

Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “R1-6” (Single-Family Residence District) to “R-

3A” (Multifamily Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following




Page 333
stipulations, violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of

the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped December 14, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations and
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, pop-outs, recesses, variation in
window size and location, pitched roofs and/or overhang canopies, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to 75th Avenue and the Grand Canal
shall contain a minimum of 25 percent brick, masonry, stone or another exterior
accent material to provide a decorative and aesthetic treatment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

4. The south landscape setback shall be planted with minimum 3-inch caliper
trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

5. Resident bicycle parking shall be provided at a rate of 0.25 spaces per dwelling
unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. These spaces shall be located near building
entrances or common areas and may be provided through a combination of
inverted U-bicycle racks, artistic style racks, “Secure/Covered Facilities” or
“Outdoor/Covered Facilities” as defined in Appendix K or the Comprehensive
Bicycle Master Plan.

6. The developer shall replenish the existing landscape area within the 75th
Avenue right-of-way with minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy shade trees
placed minimum 20-feet on center and near the sidewalk to provide thermal
comfort for pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

7. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. The developer shall dedicate 70 feet of right-of-way along the east side of 75th
Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. The developer shall construct a minimum of two 8-foot-wide shaded pedestrian
pathways constructed of decorative material such as brick, pavers or


Page 334
alternative material providing access to the Grand Canal Trail, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

10. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

12. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the

validity of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


Page 335
By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 336
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-70-21-5:

PARCEL NO. 1:
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT A POINT 40 FEET EAST AND 33 FEET SOUTH OF THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 40 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 532.90 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE EAST 508.25 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID SECTION 24, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
THE GRAND CANAL;

THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID GRAND CANAL 217.31 FEET TO A POINT;

THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH SECTION LINE, A DISTANCE OF
656.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF 75TH AVENUE, SAID POINT
BEING 40 FEET EAST AND 1877 FEET NORTH OF THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24;

THENCE NORTH 160.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE, TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF.
PARCEL NO. 2:

THE NORTH HALF OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT A POINT 70 FEET EAST AND 33 SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 70 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 532.90 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET POINT;



Page 337
THENCE EAST 452.96 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE
OF SECTION 24 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE
GRAND CANAL;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GRAND
CANAL TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST

CORNER OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED IN JOINT TENANCY WARRANTY
DEED RECORDED AS DOCKET 6900, PAGE 365;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE
OF 502.96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL NO. 3:

THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT A POINT 70.00 FEET EAST AND 33.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24;

THENCE SOUTH, ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 70.00 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 692.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;

THENCE EAST 656.25 FEET, ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID SECTION 24, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
THE GRAND CANAL;

THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, 237.68 FEET
ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE GRAND CANAL;

THENCE WEST, 817.92 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF 75TH
AVENUE, SAID POINT BEING 70.00 FEET EAST AND 1702.00 FEET NORTH OF
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24;

THENCE NORTH 175.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. PARCEL NO. 4:
THE SOUTH HALF OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT A POINT 70 FEET EAST AND 33 SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST;



Page 338
THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 70 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 532.90 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET POINT;

THENCE EAST 452.96 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE
OF SECTION 24 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE
GRAND CANAL;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GRAND
CANAL TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY
CONVEYED IN JOINT TENANCY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AS DOCKET
6900, PAGE 365;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE
OF 502.96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.




Page 339
Page 340

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

72 item(s)