2023 General Obligation Bond Program - Bond Committee Recommendations

This report transmits the recommendations of the Citizens' General Obligation (GO)
Bond Committee regarding a potential 2023 GO Bond Program for City Council
consideration. Consistent with prior recommendations of the Fiscal Capacity
Committee, and the direction of the City Council, the GO Bond Committee's
recommendation totals $500 million.

THIS ITEM IS FOR DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION.

Summary
GO Bond programs provide a mechanism to fund construction and rehabilitation of
City facilities and infrastructure such as parks, libraries, fire stations, police precincts,
community centers, streets and storm drains, and arts facilities. Bond programs
require voter approval, and cannot be used to fund operating costs like staff salaries or
to fund assets not owned by the City. Since 1957, the City's approved GO Bond
programs have totaled $4.6 billion. The most recent GO Bond program for $878.5
million was approved by voters in 2006. This 16-year gap is the longest in the City's
bond program history, and has resulted in a significant amount of unfunded capital
needs.

In March 2019, the Mayor and City Council appointed a Public Safety Bond Executive
Committee to formulate recommendations for a potential November 2020 public safety
bond election. In October 2019, the Mayor appointed a Public Safety Bond Fiscal
Capacity Committee to identify the financial parameters for any bond program and to
report its findings to the City Council. Committee meetings were held in December
2019 and January 2020 to formulate recommendations; however, the City paused
these efforts as a result of uncertainty stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subsequently, the City acquired the existing building at 100 W. Washington St. to
replace Police Headquarters, addressing one of the most critical police-related public
safety needs, and the Mayor and City Council expressed support for a broader scope
of projects for a future GO Bond program. The Committee was renamed the Fiscal
Capacity Committee and asked to assess the City’s capacity for a potential November
2023 GO Bond Program. The Fiscal Capacity Committee concluded its work in early
2022, recommending a $500 million bond program. The City Council appointed a


Page 5

Citizens' GO Bond Committee on June 1, and on June 7 upon review of the Fiscal
Capacity Committee’s findings directed the Committee to identify the highest priority
unfunded capital needs totaling $500 million for a potential November 2023 bond
election.

Between August and November, the GO Bond Executive Committee and eight
subcommittees held 34 hybrid in-person and virtual meetings open to the public.
Committee members reviewed capital needs identified by staff, and heard proposals
and input from the public, including non-profit partner agencies. The GO Bond
Executive Committee’s recommendations totaling $500 million, informed by the work
of the subcommittees, are detailed in Attachment A. The recommendations of the
eight subcommittees are also included as Attachment B.

Fiscal Capacity Committee Recommendations
The principal and interest payments on GO Bonds are typically backed by secondary
property taxes. Operations of City facilities are typically funded by General Funds and
Special Revenue Funds. The City's financial ability to implement a GO Bond program
is dependent upon:

· The amount of secondary property tax revenue projected to be available to fund
additional GO Bond principal and interest, and when it will be available;
· Whether the City can fund additional operations and maintenance costs associated
with new systems and facilities;
· Implications on the City’s credit ratings; and
· Constitutional debt limits.

The Fiscal Capacity Committee reviewed a property tax and valuation model provided
by staff as well as various stress-test scenarios. Absent unanticipated Legislative
changes, or severe economic impacts, the Fiscal Capacity Committee determined a
$500 million bond program can likely be supported without any increase to the current
secondary property tax rate of $0.8141 per $100 of net assessed valuation. Peak debt
service is not anticipated to rise substantially beyond the status quo maximum annual
debt service of $155 million, and a bond program of this magnitude is not expected to
adversely impact the City’s bond ratings. The City’s debt would additionally remain
below Constitutional debt limits.

Further, the Fiscal Capacity Committee advised this approach strategically positions
the City for subsequent bond elections in five-year increments with values of
approximately $500 million each. This would provide $2 billion in investment of City
infrastructure over the next 20 years. Financial models indicate routine bond programs


Page 6

of this magnitude will continue to be sustainable without any material increases to
property tax rates, assuming no significant legislative or economic changes.

Capacity for Ongoing Operations and Maintenance Funding
The City's General Fund (GF) pays for ongoing operating expenses to deliver core
programs and services to the community. The primary property tax rate is currently
maximized and is being fully utilized to pay for existing GF programs and services. The
primary property tax rate could therefore not be used as a source of new operations
and maintenance revenue for new systems and facilities, absent a corresponding
reduction in existing programs and services. The City is required by statute to adopt a
balanced GF budget each fiscal year where resources equal expenditures. In addition,
the City has many competing demands for GF resources including: continued rising
costs for pension and other fringe benefits; costs for facility maintenance, information
technology, and vehicle acquisition; the need to offer sustainable and competitive
salary and benefit packages for employees; and community demands for expanded or
enhanced GF programs and services. At the June 7 Formal meeting, the City Council
directed the GO Bond Committee to exclude project proposals that would result in net
new ongoing operating costs, except in critical cases.

Additionally, overall future General Fund capacity will be impacted by uncertainties
including the state of the economy and unpredictable revenue growth, future legislative
actions such as the potential elimination of residential rental taxes, labor negotiations,
and the need to phase-in results from the Classification and Compensation (Class and
Comp) Study to ensure that the City can attract and retain a skilled workforce. The
Executive Committee's recommendations totaling $500 million include an estimated
$26.8 million in net new ongoing operating costs, primarily to operate new fire stations,
parks and library facilities (Attachment A). Increases in operating costs associated
with approved GO Bond projects will be incorporated into the proposed GF budget in
the appropriate fiscal year. This information will be presented to the City Council as
part of each applicable year's proposed budget for consideration. Staff will also
incorporate estimated future costs of approved projects to the annual GF Five-Year
Forecast for modeling purposes.

2023 GO Bond Program Development and Committee Recommendations
The City's bond processes have traditionally been community-driven. Accordingly, on
June 1, the Mayor and City Council appointed a citizens' 2023 GO Bond Committee
and eight subcommittees:

· Arts and Culture
· Economic Development and Education


Page 7

· Environment and Sustainability
· Housing, Human Services and Homelessness
· Neighborhoods and City Services
· Parks and Recreation
· Public Safety
· Streets and Storm Drainage

City staff compiled a Capital Needs Study, identifying critical unfunded capital projects
to serve as the starting point for committee work. Several factors were used to identify
potential projects including: facility condition assessments; age and maintenance
requirements of existing infrastructure; facilities that could pose a safety/liability risk to
the City; key performance indicators such as service level data; and existing
comprehensive plans approved by the City Council such as the Housing Phoenix Plan,
Strategies to Address Homelessness, Climate Action Plan, and the Road Safety Action
Plan. Cost estimates were based on existing estimates (if available) established from
pre-design documents, or actual costs of recently completed comparable projects
where possible. In the absence of such information, departments worked directly with
the City Engineer's Office and Public Works Facilities Division for cost estimations.
Staff also adjusted cost estimates to account for price increases anticipated over the
five-year bond program. An inflation factor using data projections, provided by the
University of Arizona's Economic Business Research Center, was applied to all
proposed projects.

The study identified $1.2 billion in unfunded needs, divided into two categories:
Prioritized Capital Needs and Future Capital Needs. Prioritized Capital Needs, totaling
$647 million, representing the most urgent needs identified by staff while offering a
balance among the City’s service categories. Future Capital Needs, totaling $505
million, representing projects determined to be less urgent than the Prioritized Capital
Needs, or projects better suited for deferral to a future bond program. Incidentally, it is
not uncommon for the amount of unfunded capital need to exceed resources available
for GO Bond programs. For example, the 2006 GO Bond Program included unfunded
capital needs of $3.2 billion and the voter-approved bond program was $878 million.
Similarly, the 2001 GO Bond Program identified $2.8 billion in unfunded needs, and
the voter-approved bond program was $754 million.

The first Executive Committee meeting was held on Aug. 8, and direction was provided
to subcommittees to determine the highest-priority items assigned to their
subcommittee, and recommend funding values for those items. Each subcommittee
conducted at least three public meetings between August and October. Meetings were
conducted in a hybrid format, allowing the public to participate either virtually or in-


Page 8

person. Subcommittees developed recommendations that varyingly included items
from the Prioritized Capital Needs, Future Capital Needs, requests from the public, and
priorities identified independently by subcommittee members. Subcommittees
compiled recommendation reports for the Executive Committee, with subcommittee
recommendations collectively totaling $717 million (Attachment B). The subcommittee
recommended projects would additionally increase the City’s ongoing annual operating
costs by an estimated $46 million.

To assist the Executive Committee in making reductions to subcommittee
recommendations to arrive at the $500 million scope, the City Manager developed
optional targets for their consideration. These targets were not binding by the
committee and took into account:

· The prioritized list of projects in the Capital Needs Study;
· Subcommittee prioritization;
· Public comments received from residents during the subcommittee process;
· Equitable distribution of projects throughout the City;
· City departments’ ability to execute projects over the next five years;
· Future affordability by minimizing impacts to ongoing operating expenses; and
· Other funding sources currently budgeted for certain program areas.

The Executive Committee unanimously adopted these targets, with flexibility, as the
baseline to start their deliberations. Staff also provided several supplemental reports
for the committee's consideration including: other funding sources currently budgeted
for certain program areas, project scalability, and public-private partnerships. The
supplemental reports provided to the Executive Committee are included in this report
for reference as Attachment C.

On Nov. 14, after extensive deliberation, discussion and consideration of resident
feedback, the Executive Committee recommended a $500 million GO Bond Program
for Council consideration. The below list summarizes recommendations by
subcommittee program area. The Executive Committee's recommendations would
additionally increase the City's ongoing annual operating costs by an estimated $26.8
million.

· Arts and Culture (10%) $50,385,000
· Economic Development and Education (7%) $38,000,000
· Environment and Sustainability (5%) $26,000,000
· Housing, Human Services and Homelessness (13%) $63,000,000


Page 9

· Neighborhoods and City Services (9%) $44,615,000
· Parks and Recreation (13%) $64,000,000
· Public Safety (27%) $132,500,000
· Streets and Storm Drainage (16%) $81,500,000

Total Proposed GO Bond Program $500,000,000

Below is a brief summary of the Executive Committee's recommendations by program
area. Attachment A provides detailed project/program descriptions, scope, location,
multi-year cost estimates and estimated ongoing operating expenses where
applicable.

Arts and Culture: $50.4 million - 10% of the total bond program
A total of seven projects/programs are recommended for Arts and Culture including: a
new Latino Cultural Center ($21.6M) and Valley Youth Theatre ($14.0M), expansion of
the Children's Museum of Phoenix ($5.4M) and Phoenix Center of the Arts Theatre
improvements ($1.2M), the Phoenix Theatre Company's Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) accessibility projects ($5.8M), renovation and expansion funding for the
Arizona Jewish Historical Society ($2.0M), and funding for general cultural facility
critical equipment replacements ($0.4M). Funding in this program area will provide
needed resources to support projects focused on diversity, equity and inclusion
including: building Phoenix's first dedicated Latino Cultural Center in accordance with
the Latino Cultural Center Ad Hoc Committee recommendations approved by the City
Council in 2020, expand and improve local art venues used by all residents and
provide improved accommodations for persons with disabilities, and help to expand
the existing Cutler Plotkin Jewish Heritage Center to provide a state-of-the art
Holocaust Education Center. Total estimated ongoing operating costs associated with
this program area is approximately $890,000.

Economic Development and Education: $38.0 million - 7% of the total bond program
A total of three projects/programs are recommended for Economic Development and
Education including: land acquisition for Rio Reimagined ($23.5M), funding for a new
Arizona State University (ASU) Health Technology Center ($12.0M), and funding for
land acquisition to "spark" redevelopment of fragmented parcels ($2.5M). Funding in
this program area will ensure real estate is available for future economic development
of Rio Salado and other parcels to include environmental assessments and cleanup as
needed, and create a partnership with ASU to invest in infrastructure to help fund a
new health technology center to provide advanced skilled training, including nursing.
This program area does not include any net new ongoing operating costs.




Page 10

Environment and Sustainability: $26.0 million - 5% of the total bond program
A total of four projects/programs are recommended for Environment and Sustainability
including: funding for energy and water efficiency/renewable energy upgrades at City
facilities ($14.0M), funding for heat resiliency projects ($7.7M), brownfield
redevelopment program funding for City properties ($3.0M), and vehicle electrification
stations for City facilities ($1.3M). Funding in this category will help to achieve goals of
the 2021 City Council-adopted Climate Action Plan, including reduction of energy
consumption, heat mitigation efforts, green infrastructure, environmental cleanup of
contaminated property, and reduction of carbon emissions. Total estimated ongoing
operating costs associated with this program area is $190,000.

Housing, Human Services and Homelessness: $63.0 million - 13% of the total bond
program
A total of five projects/programs are recommended for Housing, Human Services and
Homelessness including: Affordable Housing Property Preservation funding for up to
610 units at four properties Citywide ($33.2M), a new Cesar Chavez Senior Center
($5.7M), renovations for the McDowell Senior Center ($1.8M), gap funding for Choice
Neighborhoods Housing Development for the Edison-Eastlake Community to
accommodate 286 affordable and 78 market-rate new rental units ($21.3M), and
funding for a new Innovation in Affordable Housing Initiative ($1.0M). Funding in this
category will help to provide a new community center and upgrades to an existing
historic center for seniors, and achieve goals of the 2020 City Council adopted
Housing Phoenix Plan, which include creating and/or preserving 50,000 affordable
housing units by 2030. Total estimated ongoing operating costs associated with this
program area is $330,000.

Neighborhoods and City Services: $44.6 million - 9% of the total bond program
A total of five projects/programs are recommended for Neighborhoods and City
Services including: a new library as part of Phase I for Estrella Village Civic Space
($8.6M), funding for City facility Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility
improvements ($10.1M), expansion of the Yucca Branch Library ($10.6M), a new
library as part of Phase I for Desert View Civic Space ($10.3M), and funding for
Historic Preservation Programs ($5.0M). Funding in this category will provide
comprehensive library programs in areas of the community currently lacking services,
provide needed funding to do necessary ADA prioritized improvements to maximize
access at a City facilities, and funding for Historic Preservation Programs including
demonstration, exterior rehabilitation, and threatened building grants. Total estimated
ongoing operating costs associated with this program area is $3.0M.

Parks and Recreation: $64.0 million - 13% of the total bond program
A total of 10 projects/programs are recommended for Parks and Recreation including:


Page 11

Citywide parks minor capital projects to be determined by the community ($1.5M), a
new recreation center at Esteban Park ($4.5M), South Mountain Park Phase I roadway
safety improvements ($7.7M), repurpose four pools in South Phoenix to provide a new
regional pool at Harmon Park, and add three splash pads at Alkire, Grant, and
University Parks ($12.8M), repurpose three pools in the Maryvale area to provide a
new regional pool at Maryvale Park, install two new splash pads at Marivue and
Holiday parks ($14.3M), design and construct Phase I of the Estrella Village Civic
Space ($8.4M), design and construct Phase I of the Desert View Village Civic Space
($8.4M), provide funding for improvements at the Telephone Pioneers of America Park
Recreation Center ($2.2M), renovation of the exterior sport courts at the Mountain
View Community Center ($1.2M), and provide funding for additional enhancements to
Margaret T. Hance Park ($3.0M). Funding in this program area will significantly
increase Parks and Recreation facility capacity to provide a variety of programming
and services in areas of the city lacking sufficient resources, while also funding
necessary roadway safety improvements to reduce the number of accidents that occur
at South Mountain Park and Preserve. Total estimated ongoing operating costs
associated with this program area is $3.3M.

Public Safety: $132.5 million - 27% of the total bond program
A total of seven projects are recommended for Public Safety including: a new Fire
Station 7/Community Assistance Program facility located at 7th Street and Hatcher
($21.4M), a new Fire Station 13/Community Assistance Program facility located at 44th
Street and Thomas ($21.8M), a new Fire Station 15/Community Assistance Program
facility located at 45th Avenue and Camelback ($21.4M), replacement of the Cactus
Park Police Precinct, including land acquisition to accommodate a future relocation of
the North Command Center, located to be determined ($37.3M), a new Fire Station 51
located at 51st Avenue and State Road 303 near the new Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company plant ($18.6M), renovation of the Police Property
Management Warehouse ($9.0M), and renovation of the Maryvale Police Precinct
($3.0M). Funding in this category will provide critical public safety infrastructure to
improve response times and mitigate service impacts on neighboring stations by
reducing redirection of resources, and improve Police operations and training facilities.
Additionally, three of the four new Fire Stations will provide facility space for personnel
with the City's Community Assistance Program (CAP) to improve mental and
behavioral health outcomes for residents. Total estimated ongoing operating costs
associated with this program area is $18.7M.

Streets and Storm Drainage: $81.5 million - 16% of the total bond program
A total of six projects/programs are recommended for Streets and Storm Drainage
including: program funding for Vision Zero projects ($16.9M), funding for Equity Based
Transportation Mobility/T2050 Mobility Implementation ($12.6M), project funding for


Page 12

flood mitigation in four areas of Laveen ($8.2M), funding to supplement the
Accelerated Pavement Maintenance Program ($22.0M), funding to implement the
Hohokam Drainage Master Plan in collaboration with the Flood Control District of
Maricopa County ($19.3M), and Storm Drainage Replacement Program funding to
replace one to two miles of deteriorating metal storm drain piping with new reinforced
concrete pipe ($2.5M). Funding in this category will help achieve goals of the 2022
Council adopted Vision Zero Road Safety Action Plan to improve safety conditions for
drivers and pedestrians on city streets, provide additional funding to improve road
conditions, accelerate implementation of mobility projects that support disadvantaged
communities and persons with disabilities where access to safe transportation is
limited, and partner with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County (FCDMC) by
providing 35 percent of the funding needed to do flood control projects in Laveen and
implement the Hohokam Area Drainage Master Plan (the FCDMC will provide 65
percent of the funding). The total estimated ongoing operating costs associated with
this program area is $390,000.

Additionally, the Executive Committee's recommendations, each subcommittee's
report, the Capital Needs Study, and all community feedback reports are available on
the GO Bond website.

Other Considerations
Percent-for-Art: Consistent with Phoenix City Code, one percent of voter-authorized
GO Bond funds would be reserved for public art projects. Certain activities such as
land acquisition and equipment are excluded from the Percent-for-Art allocation. After
accounting for exclusions, the Executive Committee's $500 million recommendation
would include approximately $3.8 million in funds for the Public Art Program. If the City
Council were to adjust the Executive Committee’s recommendations, those
adjustments may result in a change to the Percent-for-Art calculation. The City Code
authorizes Percent-for-Art funds to be aggregated, or pooled, to the extent legally
permissible. For a GO Bond program, funds could be pooled within a given
proposition. For example, all Percent-for-Art funds associated with a Street
Transportation and Drainage bond proposition could be used towards one Street
Transportation and Drainage-related public art project, or could be used towards
multiple related art projects. Funds would be available in allotments based on the
timing of actual bond sales and would be reflected in the Public Art Plan presented to
the City Council annually for review.

Environmental Impact of Proposed Projects: The 2006 GO Bond Program required all
facilities within the program to be designed and constructed to meet at least minimum
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards. Projects approved
as part of the 2023 GO Bond Program will also be required to meet these objectives,


Page 13

as well as those outlined in the Climate Action Plan and documented in the current
General Plan. City staff, led by Public Works, are revising the Citywide building
standards for new and renovation projects and plan to complete those updates by Fall
2023. The Offices of the City Engineer, Sustainability, Environmental Programs, Heat
Response and Mitigation, and the Public Works Facilities Management team will work
in partnership to develop modern building standards that reflect the City’s goals
towards a leadership role in sustainable planning and design of public facilities. Staff
will incorporate green stormwater management in all projects. These practices can be
incorporated into many building projects with minimal impact to overall project costs.
All projects will be heat ready, which will include cool roofs and shade components in
all new buildings, and in retrofits where possible. Coordination with all the offices and
functions listed above will take place to incorporate these design elements and
practices into all new buildings and renovation projects.

Project Scope: Certain projects/programs included in the Capital Needs Study are
scalable, while others have specific scope identified to ensure service levels can be
met based on department need and resident expectations. The Subcommittee and
Executive Committee recommendations included reducing the scale and scope for
certain projects. It is important to consider any further adjustment to the scope, square
footage for example, of proposed projects including fire stations, libraries, and
community centers would either hinder or impact the quality of service delivery.

Public Safety: As mentioned earlier in this report, acquisition of the 100 W. Washington
building to serve as a new Police Department Headquarters is an investment totaling
$195 million. This in turn allows bond funding capacity to be available for other City
projects and programs. The total Public Safety bond program amount recommended
by the Executive Committee is $132.5 million, for a combined Public Safety
infrastructure investment if approved of $327.5 million over the next five years. This is
a significant amount dedicated to Public Safety infrastructure. Attachment A includes
the itemized list of the Executive Committees' recommended projects for the Public
Safety program area. Recommendations include four new fire stations, replacement of
a Police precinct, and renovation of an existing precinct and property warehouse.
Additionally, with recurring GO Bond Programs every five years it is possible for the
Fire Department to build four to five new Fire Stations with every bond program,
resulting in up to 19 new fire stations across the City.

Community Engagement
Community input is a priority to ensure bond projects reflect the needs of Phoenix
residents. Staff developed a robust communications and engagement plan, which has
provided multiple ways for residents to provide feedback on proposed bond projects.
The plan has included the following:


Page 14



· Dedicated GO Bond website to include instructional video in English and Spanish;
· GO Bond interactive tool (made available on dedicated website in English and
Spanish) to allow residents to prioritize and recommend projects from the Capital
Needs Study;
· Press releases/PHX Newsroom;
· Social media outreach;
· Targeted emails;
· Spanish and English Radio ads and interviews;
· Spanish and English Print ads - Arizona Republic, AZCentral, AZ Informant, La Voz,
Prensa;
· Grocery TV ads;
· Flyer distributions via multiple City departments; and
· PAYS Newsletter.

Additionally, a dedicated public hearing was held on Sept. 14 and community input
was solicited at all 34 bond committee meetings. Residents were able to attend in
person or virtually to request to speak or provide written comments. Spanish
interpretation services were provided at every meeting. Information about bond
committee meetings, including the schedule and instructions on how to participate,
was made available on the GO Bond dedicated website in July 2022 prior to
committee meetings commencing in August 2022.

Community Feedback Reports were compiled twice per month, published on the GO
Bond website, and provided to GO Bond Committee members. The most recent
Community Feedback Report is included with this report for reference as Attachment
D. The City received approximately 1,000 comments made by phone or email, through
the GOPHX tool, and at GO Bond Committee meetings. Additionally, resident
engagement with social media posts on FaceBook and Twitter included 15,943 clicks,
comments, reactions and shares, and GO Bond Committee meetings had 7,295 views
on YouTube.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends City Council action to:
1) Approve the GO Bond Executive Committee’s recommendations; and
2) Direct staff to prepare ballot language for a November 2023 election, for review and
approval by City Council.




Page 15

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
and Finance departments.




Page 16
Attachment A




To: Mayor & City Council Date: November 22, 2022

From: Sharon Harper, Chairwoman General Obligation Bond Executive Committee

Subject: GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

The General Obligation (GO) Bond Committee was charged by the City Council with an
important and challenging task: to identify projects representing the highest priority needs
totaling no more than $500M. Over the course of 34 committee meetings, and after
extensive public input including approximately 1,000 resident comments, the committee
arrived at recommendations totaling $500M for your consideration. A summary of
recommendations by subcommittee program area is included below, and the full list of
recommendations is attached for your reference (Attachment A).

The total population of projects recommended by the GO Bond Subcommittees totaled
$717M requiring difficult decisions to be made to arrive at our recommendations. The City
Manager recommended targets by subcommittee program area for our consideration to
serve as a starting point for deliberations. Determinants in development of each target
included the ability of City staff to execute projects over the next five years, impacts to
ongoing operating costs, and equitable distribution of projects throughout the City. The
committee considered these factors and feedback from residents in our decision making.

GO Bond Executive Committee Recommendations

Program Area $ GO Bond
Arts & Culture $50,385,000
Economic Development & Education 38,000,000
Environment & Sustainability 26,000,000
Housing, Human Services & Homelessness 63,000,000
Neighborhoods & City Services 44,615,000
Parks & Recreation 64,000,000
Public Safety 132,500,000
Streets & Storm Drainage 81,500,000

Total $500,000,000




Page 17
Additionally, the Executive Committee requested the City Council consider the below
projects in the future if additional funding becomes available:

 Symphony Hall Theatrical Venue Improvements - $5.7M
 Expansion of the Parsons Center for Health and Wellness - $6.9M

It was an honor to serve as Chair of the GO Bond Executive Committee. I would like to
thank my fellow committee members for their time and commitment to the process. I
believe our recommendations reflect the highest priority needs of the City and will benefit
all members of the community.

Sincerely,



Sharon Harper
Chair, GO Bond Executive Committee




Page 18
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Summary

Arts & Culture

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Latino Cultural Center 7 21,626,050 512,216
2 Valley Youth Theatre Permanent Home 7 14,022,720 271,040
3 Children's Museum of Phoenix Expansion 8 5,373,988 105,230
4 Phoenix Center for the Arts Theater Improvements 7 1,194,312 0
5 Phoenix Theatre Company ADA Accesssibility 4 5,772,506 0
6 Arizona Jewish Historical Society Renovation & Expansion 7 2,010,424 0
7 Cultural Facilities Critical Equipment Replacements Citywide 385,339 0

Arts & Culture Recommended Total 50,385,339 888,486


Economic Development & Education

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Rio Reimagined Land Acquisition 7, 8 23,500,000 0
2 ASU Health Technology Center Citywide 12,000,000 0
3 Spark Area Land Acquisition - Reuse and Redevelopment Strategy Implementation 8 2,500,000 0

Economic Development & Education Recommended Total 38,000,000 0


Environment & Sustainability

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy Upgrades at City Facilities Citywide 14,000,000 0
2 Heat Resiliency Citywide 7,700,000 171,053
3 Brownfields Redevelopment Program for City-Owned Properties Citywide 3,000,000 0
4 City Facility Vehicle Electrification Stations Citywide 1,300,000 20,000

Environment & Sustainability Recommended Total 26,000,000 191,053


Housing, Human Services & Homelessness

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Affordable Housing Property Preservation - Phase I Citywide 33,170,454 0
2 Cesar Chavez Senior Center 7, 8 5,734,913 331,705
3 McDowell Senior Center Renovation 8 1,773,692 0
4 Choice Neighborhoods Housing Development Gap Funding 8 21,320,941 0
5 Innovation in Affordable Housing Citywide 1,000,000 0

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness Recommended Total 63,000,000 331,705




Page 19
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Summary

Neighborhoods & City Services

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Branch Library at Estrella Civic Space 7 8,574,460 856,621
2 City Facility ADA Improvements Citywide 10,100,000 0
3 Yucca Branch Library Expansion 5 10,626,991 1,288,064
4 Branch Library at Desert View Civic Space 2 10,313,210 856,621
5 Historic Preservation Programs Citywide 5,000,000 0

Neighborhoods & City Services Recommended Total 44,614,661 3,001,306


Parks & Recreation

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Citywide Funding for Parks Minor Capital Projects Citywide 1,501,777 0
2 Esteban Park Recreation Center 8 4,505,333 296,572
3 South Mountain Roadway Safety Enhancements - Phase I 6, 8 7,695,631 0
4 Harmon Park Regional Pool and Three Splash Pad Sites 7, 8 12,789,840 279,540
5 Maryvale Park Regional Pool and Two Splash Pads Sites 4, 5 14,367,712 464,060
6 Estrella Civic Space - Phase I 7 8,352,835 1,600,000
7 Desert View Civic Space - Phase I 2 8,385,263 686,000
8 Telephone Pioneers of America Park Recreation Center Improvements 1 2,204,642 0
9 Mountain View Community Center Sports Complex Improvements 2, 3 1,193,412 0
10 Margaret T Hance Park Improvements 7 3,003,555 0

Parks & Recreation Recommended Total 64,000,000 3,326,172


Public Safety

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Fire Station 7 / Community Assistance Program (7th Street & Hatcher Road) 3 21,408,057 3,727,000
2 Fire Station 13 / Community Assistance Program (44th Street & Thomas Road) 6, 8 21,753,090 3,727,000
3 Fire Station 15 / Community Assistance Program (45th Avenue & Camelback Road) 5 21,408,055 3,727,000
4 Cactus Park Precinct Replacement 1 37,338,657 0
5 Fire Station 51 (51st Avenue & SR 303) 1 18,577,682 7,529,000
6 Police Property Management Warehouse Renovation 7 9,027,896 0
7 Maryvale Police Precinct Renovation 4, 5, 7 2,986,563 0

Public Safety Recommended Total 132,500,000 18,710,000




Page 20
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Summary

Streets & Storm Drainage

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Vision Zero Implementation Citywide 16,922,765 258,393
2 Equity Based Transportation Mobility - T2050 Mobility Implementation Citywide 12,570,371 127,343
3 Laveen Flood Mitigation 7 8,230,401 0
4 Pavement Maintenance Supplement Citywide 22,030,869 0
5 Hohokam Drainage Program 8 19,245,594 0
6 Storm Drain Replacement Program Citywide 2,500,000 0

Streets & Storm Drainage Recommended Total 81,500,000 385,736



Executive Committee Bond Program Recommended Total 500,000,000 26,834,458




Page 21
ARTS & CULTURE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council


Rank Project Name Total Cost Other Funds GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost
1 Latino Cultural Center 21,626,050 0 21,626,050 512,216
Location: 1202 North 3rd Street (North Building at Hance Park)
District: 7
2 Valley Youth Theatre Permanent Home 14,022,720 0 14,022,720 271,040
Location: 525 North 1st Street
District: 7
3 Children's Museum of Phoenix Expansion 5,373,988 0 5,373,988 105,230
Location: 215 North 7th Street
District: 8
4 Phoenix Center for the Arts Theater Improvements 1,194,312 0 1,194,312 0
Location: 1202 North 3rd Street
District: 7
5 Phoenix Theatre Company ADA Accesssibility 7,774,993 2,002,487 5,772,506 0
Location: 1825 North Central Avenue
District: 4
6 Arizona Jewish Historical Society Renovation & Expansion 2,010,424 0 2,010,424 0
Location: 122 East Culver Street
District: 7
7 Cultural Facilities Critical Equipment Replacements 385,339 0 385,339 0
Location: Various
District: Citywide

Arts & Culture Recommended Total 52,387,826 2,002,487 50,385,339 888,486




Page 22
ARTS & CULTURE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Latino Cultural Center
Rank: 1
1202 North 3rd Street (North Building at Hance Park) (District: 7)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$21,626,050 $0 $21,626,050

SCOPE
Design and construct a world-class Latino Cultural Center in accordance with the Latino Center Ad Hoc Committee recommendations that were approved by


BENEFIT
The Latino Cultural Center will be a premier center that celebrates the diversity, legacies, and influences of Latino culture in America's Southwest region.
The center will be inclusive, welcoming, participatory, and accessible to all residents of Phoenix and beyond. It will provide programs and activities focusing
on education for all ages in arts, culture, and critical issues to the Latino community. The cultural center will be adaptive and responsive to a wide range of
representation and needs for optimal participation and experience. Finally, the center will be an administrative and artistic conduit for the existing Latino arts
and culture community and programming defined by partnerships and collaboration.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 1,718,400 0 0 0 0 1,718,400
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 17,487,000 0 0 0 17,487,000
EQUIPMENT 0 2,228,596 0 0 0 2,228,596
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 192,054
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,718,400 19,715,596 0 0 0 21,626,050



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 376,696
CONTRACTUALS 135,520
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 512,216




Page 23
ARTS & CULTURE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Valley Youth Theatre Permanent Home
Rank: 2
525 North 1st Street (District: 7)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$14,022,720 $0 $14,022,720

SCOPE
Secure land, design and construct a new Valley Youth Center for the Arts to provide a permanent home for the Valley Youth Theatre. The Center includes a
300-seat feature theatre plus a 99-seat studio theatre for smaller productions. Also included are office and meeting space, rehearsal/workshop space, dance
studios, galleries and space for set, costumes, prop shops and storage.


BENEFIT
The current home of The Valley Youth Theatre was acquired by ASU through an agreement with the City and is slated to be incorporated in the ASU
Downtown Campus, displacing The Valley Youth Theatre. The new Valley Youth Center for the Arts will provide a permanent home for The Valley Youth
Theatre while allowing for significant expansion of youth arts programs and events in Phoenix.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 435,234 0 0 0 0 435,234
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 3,046,638 0 0 0 0 3,046,638
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 4,429,084 4,520,644 0 0 8,949,728
EQUIPMENT 0 0 1,471,156 0 0 1,471,156
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 119,964
TOTAL PROJECT COST 3,481,872 4,429,084 5,991,800 0 0 14,022,720



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 271,040
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 271,040




Page 24
ARTS & CULTURE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Children's Museum of Phoenix Expansion
Rank: 3
215 North 7th Street (District: 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$5,373,988 $0 $5,373,988

SCOPE
Renovate and upgrade all unfinished spaces in the historic Monroe School building, including 17,621 square feet of public space for exhibits and programs,
and 9,922 square feet of under-finished service support space, to make the entire building usable and bring it up to current building codes. Work needed
includes abatement, demolition, structural, mechanical/HVAC, plumbing, electrical, flooring, drywall, finishes, windows/doors and ADA compliance. Two
rooms require major structural improvements, 8 rooms do not have certificates-of-occupancy, 5 rooms have no air conditioning, 8+ areas need lead
abatement, and all 11 unfinished rooms need drywall, electrical upgrades and lighting.


BENEFIT
The renovation will increase public space by over 1/3, increasing annual capacity by 150,000+ visitors. The Children's Museum will increase the number and
variety of exhibits and programs they offer, which will directly impact young children and families who have suffered social, emotional, and developmental
learning losses because of COVID. There will be increased access to the Museum by community partners, schools, and other social impact organizations;
and the Children's Museum will be able to move forward with its plans to develop an early childhood educator training institute - increasing the number of
high-quality childcare providers in the city. Additional revenue generation will benefit the Children's Museum's financial resiliency.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 103,320 0 0 0 0 103,320
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 3,937,049 1,000,000 0 0 4,937,049
EQUIPMENT 0 0 283,215 0 0 283,215
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 50,404
TOTAL PROJECT COST 103,320 3,937,049 1,283,215 0 0 5,373,988



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 105,230
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 105,230




Page 25
ARTS & CULTURE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Phoenix Center for the Arts Theater Improvements
Rank: 4
1202 North 3rd Street (District: 7)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$1,194,312 $0 $1,194,312

SCOPE
Replace/upgrade theatrical lighting, audio systems, seating, rigging, and the outdoor marquee at the Phoenix Center for the Arts Third Street Theater. The
facility hosts over 150 performances a year from resident companies and rentals.


BENEFIT
The Phoenix Center for the Arts Third Street Theater facility will be brought up to current industry standards to better serve the needs of the community,
including artists, performers, students, patrons, and residents. Repairs are not possible as replacement parts are no longer manufactured. As a result, the
non-profits, youth theater, choral, and dance groups that utilize this performance space are forced to work around dark spots on the stage, or opt for a venue
with newer technology. Failure to fund this project may result in cancellation of services, programs and theatatrical events.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT 1,194,312 0 0 0 0 1,194,312
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,194,312 0 0 0 0 1,194,312



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 26
ARTS & CULTURE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Phoenix Theatre Company ADA Accesssibility
Rank: 5
1825 North Central Avenue (District: 4)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$7,774,993 $2,002,487 $5,772,506

SCOPE
Construct a 3-floor, approximately 13,000 square-foot building on land at the southwest corner of Alvarado Road and Coronado Road, adjacent to the
Phoenix Theater Company's existing facility. The building would address urgent accessibility issues, offering ADA accessible office, classroom/studio and
rehearsal spaces. These improvements would accompany separate improvements planned by the Phoenix Theater Company to expand the Hormel Theater
from 250 to 500 seats and increase its technical capabilities. Bond funding would be supplemented by $2 million in cost share from the Phoenix Theater
Company.


BENEFIT
The Phoenix Theatre Company's main rehearsal hall and dance studio are located on the second floor of its administrative section. They are not ADA
accessible and cannot be retrofitted due to the physical constraints of the two stairwells that provide entry. There are no other accessible spaces on the
campus that approximate the layout of the Mainstage. The Phoenix Theater Company cannot hire actors, directors, musicians, stage management and other
artists with mobility issues. The second floor also contains the administrative conference room and a third of the administrative offices, which are similarly
inaccessible to staff with mobility issues. Ground floor administrative offices are additionally difficult to access, requiring a staff member who uses a
wheelchair to pull himself hand-over-hand up a ramp that is not ADA compliant. The proposed new building would provide ADA accessible rehearsal, office
and classroom/studio spaces, remediating these significant ADA deficiencies.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 1,613,513 0 0 0 0 1,613,513
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 4,101,839 0 0 0 0 4,101,839
EQUIPMENT 2,002,487 0 0 0 0 2,002,487
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 57,154
TOTAL PROJECT COST 7,717,839 0 0 0 0 7,774,993



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
Phoenix Theater Company 2,002,487 0 0 0 0 2,002,487



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 27
ARTS & CULTURE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Arizona Jewish Historical Society Renovation & Expansion
Rank: 6
122 East Culver Street (District: 7)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$2,010,424 $0 $2,010,424

SCOPE
Update and expand the Cutler Plotkin Jewish Heritage Center to include a 17,000 square foot addition, a state-of-the-art Holocaust Education Center, the
Robert Stutz We Remember art collection, a special exhibit gallery, classrooms and event space. The upgrades includes new displays, technology, and
lighting. The new design will update the existing building while preserving the historical integrity.


BENEFIT
Phoenix is the largest U.S. City that does not have a Holocaust museum. This center will provide students, teachers and the community an opportunity to
see, hear and learn the history and lessons of the Holocaust and its global relevancy.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 1,990,519 0 0 0 0 1,990,519
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 19,905
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,990,519 0 0 0 0 2,010,424



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 28
ARTS & CULTURE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Cultural Facilities Critical Equipment Replacements
Rank: 7
Various (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$385,339 $0 $385,339

SCOPE
Extend the functional life of City-owned cultural facilities by replacing critical equipment and plumbing/mechanical systems, performing maintenance on
necessary structural elements (e.g. parking lots and roofing), and completing cosmetics updates where needed.


BENEFIT
Ensure long-term service continuity of the City's cultural centers and facilities, and prevent conditions from becoming unsafe to the public and staff as a
result from continued deferred maintenance. Failure to properly maintain infrastructure and replace aging equipment can lead to disruptive facility
shutdowns, cause irreparable damage, and lead to costly repairs.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT 385,339 0 0 0 0 385,339
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST 385,339 0 0 0 0 385,339



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 29
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council


Rank Project Name Total Cost Other Funds GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost
1 Rio Reimagined Land Acquisition 23,500,000 0 23,500,000 0
Location: TBD
District: 7, 8
2 ASU Health Technology Center 12,000,000 0 12,000,000 0
Location: TBD
District: Citywide
3 Spark Area Land Acquisition - Reuse and Redevelopment Strategy 2,500,000 0 2,500,000 0
Implementation
Location: Various
District: 8

Economic Development & Education Recommended Total 38,000,000 0 38,000,000 0




Page 30
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Rio Reimagined Land Acquisition
Rank: 1
TBD (District: 7, 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$23,500,000 $0 $23,500,000

SCOPE
Acquire land and perform predevelopment activities that may include environmental assessments and cleanup necessary to prepare economically attractive
sites along the Rio Salado for development.


BENEFIT
Establish development-ready sites along the Rio Salado which have been positioned to facilitate the City’s long term vision of this area.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 4,750,000 4,750,000 4,750,000 4,750,000 4,500,000 23,500,000
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST 4,750,000 4,750,000 4,750,000 4,750,000 4,500,000 23,500,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 31
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

ASU Health Technology Center
Rank: 2
TBD (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$12,000,000 $0 $12,000,000

SCOPE
In partnership with Arizona State University, invest in infrastructure and public building improvements related to the development of a $75 million to $130
million Health Technology Center.


BENEFIT
Develop a new set of programs in Public Health Technology, including advanced training and degree programs (including advanced nursing) and retraining
of existing workforce.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 11,881,188 0 0 11,881,188
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 118,812
TOTAL PROJECT COST 0 0 11,881,188 0 0 12,000,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 32
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Spark Area Land Acquisition - Reuse and Redevelopment Strategy Implementation
Rank: 3
Various (District: 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$2,500,000 $0 $2,500,000

SCOPE
The Land Reuse Strategy Planning Area Plan was developed in 2017 to address the reuse and redevelopment of fragmented City-owned parcels located
roughly between 7th and 16th Streets, Washington Street and University Drive. This program will fund the acquisition of private parcels, as they become
available, to fill in ownership gaps and facilitate redevelopment in these areas.


BENEFIT
This program would help implement the City’s long-term vision for Spark areas. Consolidating small fragmented parcels will improve marketability and
facilitate the reuse and redevelopment of these parcels to help reactivate commercial areas with strong potential.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 33
ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council


Rank Project Name Total Cost Other Funds GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost
1 Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy Upgrades at City 14,000,000 0 14,000,000 0
Facilities
Location: Various
District: Citywide
2 Heat Resiliency 7,700,000 0 7,700,000 171,053
Location: Citywide
District: Citywide
3 Brownfields Redevelopment Program for City-Owned Properties 3,000,000 0 3,000,000 0
Location: Citywide
District: Citywide
4 City Facility Vehicle Electrification Stations 1,300,000 0 1,300,000 20,000
Location: Various
District: Citywide

Environment & Sustainability Recommended Total 26,000,000 0 26,000,000 191,053




Page 34
ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy Upgrades at City Facilities
Rank: 1
Various (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$14,000,000 $0 $14,000,000

SCOPE
Install energy efficient HVAC equipment or other climate control systems to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from City facilities.
Facility Condition Assessments identified the need to replace aging and inefficient HVAC systems at many facilities including City-operated community and
recreation centers, arts and cultural facilities, and administrative buildings. Additionally, implement renewable energy solutions, such as solar, where
appropriate.


BENEFIT
Avoid service disruptions that may result from unplanned equipment and/or systems failures. Reduce operating expenses of certain City facilities by
integrating the best available technologies. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other climate impacts caused by City operations.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT 4,500,000 4,500,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,500,000 14,000,000
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST 4,500,000 4,500,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,500,000 14,000,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 35
ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Heat Resiliency
Rank: 2
Citywide (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$7,700,000 $0 $7,700,000

SCOPE
Expand the City’s Tree Planting, Green Infrastructure, Cool Roofs, Cool Corridors and Cool Pavements programs. Implement other emerging ideas to
address heat resiliency within City facilities, infrastructure, land or rights-of-way.


BENEFIT
Reduce the impacts of climate change and urban heat on resident and visitor health. This program will be most impactful in locations where residents tend to
have limited access to vehicles, and must walk or bike to their destinations with greater frequency. This program can help to address historical equity issues
in parts of the City where residents are more vulnerable to heat-related hazards.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 400,650 0 0 0 0 400,650
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 360,875 360,875 0 0 721,750
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 3,254,645 3,254,645 0 0 6,509,290
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 68,310
TOTAL PROJECT COST 400,650 3,615,520 3,615,520 0 0 7,700,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 117,053
CONTRACTUALS 54,000
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 171,053




Page 36
ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Brownfields Redevelopment Program for City-Owned Properties
Rank: 3
Citywide (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000

SCOPE
Funding to assist City departments with pre-development costs associated with environmentally contaminated properties. Preference would be given to
projects located within the following targeted areas: Rio Reimagined Project Area, West Phoenix Revitalization Area, Infill Incentive Area, Transit-Oriented
Development Areas, Downtown Development Area, Designated Redevelopment Areas and Neighborhood Initiative Areas.


BENEFIT
environmental hazards, expanding green space, and creating sustainability opportunities (e.g. green buildings and infrastructure). Without this funding
source, contaminated properties may remain blighted, undeveloped, and a burden to the local community.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 3,000,000
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 3,000,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 37
ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

City Facility Vehicle Electrification Stations
Rank: 4
Various (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$1,300,000 $0 $1,300,000

SCOPE
Provide electrification infrastructure at city facilities to support the city’s fleet, residents and employees. The number and type of installations funded by this
item are driven by capital needs identified by an ongoing fleet electrification study.


BENEFIT
emissions related to automobile activity. Not funding this program could delay the availability of charging infrastructure.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT 650,000 650,000 0 0 0 1,300,000
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST 650,000 650,000 0 0 0 1,300,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 20,000
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 20,000




Page 38
HOUSING, HUMAN SERVICES & HOMELESSNESS
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council


Rank Project Name Total Cost Other Funds GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost
1 Affordable Housing Property Preservation - Phase I 33,170,454 0 33,170,454 0
Location: Various
District: Citywide
2 Cesar Chavez Senior Center 9,734,913 4,000,000 5,734,913 331,705
Location: Cesar Chavez Regional Park
District: 7, 8
3 McDowell Senior Center Renovation 1,773,692 0 1,773,692 0
Location: 1845 East McDowell Road
District: 8
4 Choice Neighborhoods Housing Development Gap Funding 21,320,941 0 21,320,941 0
Location: Edison-Eastlake Community
District: 8
5 Innovation in Affordable Housing 1,000,000 0 1,000,000 0
Location: Various
District: Citywide

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness Recommended Total 67,000,000 4,000,000 63,000,000 331,705




Page 39
HOUSING, HUMAN SERVICES & HOMELESSNESS
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Affordable Housing Property Preservation - Phase I
Rank: 1
Various (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$33,170,454 $0 $33,170,454

SCOPE
Renovate and preserve up to 610 affordable housing units at 4 properties where physical condition assessments have been completed and identified critical
needs. Renovations include structural repairs, electrical and mechanical improvements, HVAC replacements, and other updates. Complete Facility
Condition Assessments at 16 additional Housing Department properties.


BENEFIT
initiative of the HPP is: Expand Efforts to Preserve Existing Housing Stock. This program supports the HPP's mission to preserve affordable housing units in
the Housing Department portfolio for low to moderate income families, individuals, seniors, and special populations. All affordable rental properties that
benefit from this program are owned by the City and managed by professional management companies. There are no federal funding programs available for
on-going maintenance and repairs at these properties. Not funding this program would result in fewer affordable housing units that are suitable for
occupancy, higher cost of future repairs and equipment replacements, more frequent disruptions from system outages, and potential safety issues for
residents.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 229,120 0 0 0 0 229,120
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 1,704,653 0 1,713,456 0 0 3,418,109
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 14,455,920 0 14,741,153 0 29,197,073
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 326,152
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,933,773 14,455,920 1,713,456 14,741,153 0 33,170,454



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 40
HOUSING, HUMAN SERVICES & HOMELESSNESS
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Cesar Chavez Senior Center
Rank: 2
Cesar Chavez Regional Park (District: 7, 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$9,734,913 $4,000,000 $5,734,913

SCOPE
Design and construct a new 12,600 square foot multi-purpose senior center adjacent to the Cesar Chavez Community Center.


BENEFIT
The new Cesar Chavez Senior Center would serve seniors in the immediate area as well as many neighboring zip codes. Human Services currently has
membership of more than 1,000 seniors that reside near the location of the proposed Cesar Chavez Senior Center.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 171,840 0 0 0 0 171,840
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 2,644,034 0 0 0 2,644,034
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 6,746,733 0 0 6,746,733
EQUIPMENT 0 0 116,680 0 0 116,680
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 55,626
TOTAL PROJECT COST 171,840 2,644,034 6,863,413 0 0 9,734,913



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
2006 Bond / Sale of parcel 171,840 2,644,034 1,184,126 0 0 4,000,000



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 209,813
CONTRACTUALS 93,531
COMMODITIES 1,200
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 27,161
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 331,705




Page 41
HOUSING, HUMAN SERVICES & HOMELESSNESS
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

McDowell Senior Center Renovation
Rank: 3
1845 East McDowell Road (District: 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$1,773,692 $0 $1,773,692

SCOPE
Renovate the historic McDowell Senior Center. Modernize HVAC equipment, update the electrical system, replace existing plumbing, update the fire
suppression system, and restore the building envelope, interior office and meeting spaces.


BENEFIT
Preserve a historic City-owned and maintained building. Extend the useful life of critical equipment and infrastructure. Improve functionality of the building
and visitor experience. Ensure continuity of service by reducing the potential for unplanned closures from equipment failure.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 57,280 0 0 0 0 57,280
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 87,435 0 0 0 87,435
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 1,189,900 0 0 1,189,900
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 69,334 0 69,334
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 356,970 0 0 356,970
PERCENT FOR ART 12,773
TOTAL PROJECT COST 57,280 87,435 1,546,870 69,334 0 1,773,692



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 42
HOUSING, HUMAN SERVICES & HOMELESSNESS
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Choice Neighborhoods Housing Development Gap Funding
Rank: 4
Edison-Eastlake Community (District: 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$21,320,941 $0 $21,320,941

SCOPE
Cover the increased cost for construction, materials, and labor necessary to complete the final phase (Phase IV) of the Edison-Eastlake redevelopment
project. Phase IV consists of 364 new, modern, mixed-income rental housing units (286 affordable and 78 market rate).


BENEFIT
Initiative of the HPP is: Redevelop City-Owned Land with Mixed-income Housing. The Edison-Eastlake Community redevelopment project replaces 577
obsolete public housing units with over 1,000 new mixed income units. The City was awarded a $30 million Choice Neighborhoods Grant from the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development in 2018 to transform and revitalize the Edison-Eastlake Community. No additional federal grant funds are
available to complete Phase IV of the redevelopment project. Without additional funding, 286 affordable and 78 market rate new rental housing units would
not be completed, and community revitalization would be delayed.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 6,873,600 6,994,800 7,241,443 0 0 21,109,843
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 211,098
TOTAL PROJECT COST 6,873,600 6,994,800 7,241,443 0 0 21,320,941



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 43
HOUSING, HUMAN SERVICES & HOMELESSNESS
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Innovation in Affordable Housing
Rank: 5
Various (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000

SCOPE
Create preapproved designs for Accessory Dwelling Units, Duplexes, Single Family/Tiny Home, and other forms of infill identified in the Housing Phoenix
Plan, potentially saving on project costs and time to help develop more affordable units and meet the City's Housing Phoenix Goal of 50,000 new homes by
2030.


BENEFIT
Phoenix is in the middle of a housing and homelessness crisis with imminent risk of ongoing displacement without substantial action. This project seeks to
help the City reach its affordable and total unit goals.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 44
NEIGHBORHOODS & CITY SERVICES
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council


Rank Project Name Total Cost Other Funds GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost
1 Branch Library at Estrella Civic Space 11,574,460 3,000,000 8,574,460 856,621
Location: 99th Avenue & Lower Buckeye Road
District: 7
2 City Facility ADA Improvements 10,100,000 0 10,100,000 0
Location: Public Works Properties - All
District: Citywide
3 Yucca Branch Library Expansion 10,626,991 0 10,626,991 1,288,064
Location: 5648 North 15th Avenue
District: 5
4 Branch Library at Desert View Civic Space 11,813,210 1,500,000 10,313,210 856,621
Location: Deer Valley Drive & Tatum Boulevard
District: 2
5 Historic Preservation Programs 5,000,000 0 5,000,000 0
Location: Multiple
District: Citywide

Neighborhoods & City Services Recommended Total 49,114,661 4,500,000 44,614,661 3,001,306




Page 45
NEIGHBORHOODS & CITY SERVICES
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Branch Library at Estrella Civic Space
Rank: 1
99th Avenue & Lower Buckeye Road (District: 7)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$11,574,460 $3,000,000 $8,574,460

SCOPE
Design and construct a new 13,000 square foot branch library as part of Phase 1 of the Estrella Village Civic Space. Phase 1 consists of the civic space
master plan, design of a regional park, construction of park amenities, and a branch library. At final completion the Estrella Village Civic Space is expected
to include a 93 acre regional park, a community center, an aquatic center, and a branch library.


BENEFIT
Provide the public with robust access to free internet computers, as well as free Wi-Fi and other technology amenities, complemented by a collection of
approximately 30,000 library materials. In addition, meeting room spaces would be available for public rental and for use by Library staff for programming
such as storytimes, Kindergarten Bootcamp, workforce efforts, and more. Non-implementation of the project will mean that the public in this community will
need to continue to travel further in order to receive similar services.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 286,400 0 0 0 0 286,400
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 2,125,545 0 0 0 2,125,545
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 6,574,198 0 0 6,574,198
EQUIPMENT 0 0 2,409,800 0 0 2,409,800
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 121,520 0 121,520
PERCENT FOR ART 56,997
TOTAL PROJECT COST 286,400 2,125,545 8,983,998 121,520 0 11,574,460



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
Impact Fees (1043, 2613, 3033) 0 2,125,545 874,455 0 0 3,000,000



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 630,777
CONTRACTUALS 101,306
COMMODITIES 17,474
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 68,064
ON-GOING CAPITAL 39,000
TOTAL OPERATING 856,621




Page 46
NEIGHBORHOODS & CITY SERVICES
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

City Facility ADA Improvements
Rank: 2
Public Works Properties - All (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$10,100,000 $0 $10,100,000

SCOPE
Ensure ongoing compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act at City facilities. Complete prioritized improvements to signage, restrooms, parking lots,
ramps, doors, and other barriers to maximize access.


BENEFIT
Establish a multiyear funding program (considered a best practice) for continued compliance with ADA standards. Not funding this item would likely have the
effect of unduly restricting building access for individuals with disabilities.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 10,000,000
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 100,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 10,100,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 47
NEIGHBORHOODS & CITY SERVICES
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Yucca Branch Library Expansion
Rank: 3
5648 North 15th Avenue (District: 5)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$10,626,991 $0 $10,626,991

SCOPE
Add 10,000 square feet to Yucca Branch Library to improve visitor experience by adding new amenities and reducing wait times. The additional space will
provide new meeting and study rooms, allow for additional public computers, and accommodate an Automated Materials Handling System.


BENEFIT
Increase the capacity for serving customers and improve the experience of visitors that attend library programs, access public computers, and make use of
other library services at the City's 4th busiest library location. The Automated Materials Handling System will improve the efficiency of checking-in and
sorting returned library materials.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 196,860 0 0 0 0 196,860
REAL PROPERTY 1,947,520 0 0 0 0 1,947,520
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 1,606,704 0 0 0 0 1,606,704
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 4,954,650 0 0 0 4,954,650
EQUIPMENT 0 0 1,784,850 0 0 1,784,850
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 70,793 0 0 70,793
PERCENT FOR ART 65,614
TOTAL PROJECT COST 3,751,084 4,954,650 1,855,643 0 0 10,626,991



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 981,534
CONTRACTUALS 135,542
COMMODITIES 17,474
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 84,514
ON-GOING CAPITAL 69,000
TOTAL OPERATING 1,288,064




Page 48
NEIGHBORHOODS & CITY SERVICES
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Branch Library at Desert View Civic Space
Rank: 4
Deer Valley Drive & Tatum Boulevard (District: 2)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$11,813,210 $1,500,000 $10,313,210

SCOPE
Design and construct a new 13,000 square foot branch library as part of Phase 1 of the Desert View Civic Space. Phase 1 consists of the civic space master
plan, design of a regional park, construction of park amenities, and a branch library. At final completion the Desert View Village Civic Space is expected to
include a 40 acre regional park, and a community center.


BENEFIT
This new branch library will enhance local library services in the rapidly growing Desert View Village including free internet and other computer technology
amenities, access to approximately 30,000 library materials, community meeting space, and library programs for all ages such as children’s story times,
Kindergarten Bootcamp, workforce-related programs, and more. Additionally, a new branch library will help relieve crowding at the closest existing branch
library that is more than 6 miles away and already the busiest branch in the City. If the project is not approved local access to library services will remain
limited for the residents of Desert View Village, and neighboring branch library locations can be expected to experience growing crowds, longer wait times,
and overall reduced service levels.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 286,400 0 0 0 0 286,400
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 2,169,485 0 0 2,169,485
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 6,713,980 0 6,713,980
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 2,445,400 0 2,445,400
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 124,110 124,110
PERCENT FOR ART 73,835
TOTAL PROJECT COST 286,400 0 2,169,485 9,159,380 124,110 11,813,210



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
Impact Fees 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 630,777
CONTRACTUALS 101,306
COMMODITIES 17,474
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 68,064
ON-GOING CAPITAL 39,000
TOTAL OPERATING 856,621




Page 49
NEIGHBORHOODS & CITY SERVICES
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Historic Preservation Programs
Rank: 5
Multiple (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000

SCOPE
Provide funding for historic preservation programs including demonstration project grants, exterior rehabilitation grants, protection of downtown warehouses
and other threatened historic buildings, and rehabilitation of historic properties owned by the City.


BENEFIT
Economic benefits of preservation include job creation, increased property values, visitor attraction though heritage tourism, and support of local businesses,
while environmental benefits include sustainability and adaptive reuse of existing vacant structures.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 50
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council


Rank Project Name Total Cost Other Funds GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost
1 Citywide Funding for Parks Minor Capital Projects 1,501,777 0 1,501,777 0
Location: Citywide
District: Citywide
2 Esteban Park Recreation Center 5,005,333 500,000 4,505,333 296,572
Location: 3345 East Roeser Road
District: 8
3 South Mountain Roadway Safety Enhancements - Phase I 7,695,631 0 7,695,631 0
Location: 10919 South Central Avenue
District: 6, 8
4 Harmon Park Regional Pool and Three Splash Pad Sites 12,789,840 0 12,789,840 279,540
Location: Various
District: 7, 8
5 Maryvale Park Regional Pool and Two Splash Pads Sites 14,367,712 0 14,367,712 464,060
Location: Various
District: 4, 5
6 Estrella Civic Space - Phase I 12,352,835 4,000,000 8,352,835 1,600,000
Location: 91st Avenue & Lower Buckeye Road
District: 7
7 Desert View Civic Space - Phase I 8,385,263 0 8,385,263 686,000
Location: Deer Valley Drive & Tatum Boulevard
District: 2
8 Telephone Pioneers of America Park Recreation Center Improvements 2,204,642 0 2,204,642 0
Location: 1946 West Morningside Drive
District: 1
9 Mountain View Community Center Sports Complex Improvements 1,193,412 0 1,193,412 0
Location: 1104 East Grovers Road
District: 2, 3
10 Margaret T Hance Park Improvements 3,003,555 0 3,003,555 0
Location: 67 West Culver Street
District: 7

Parks & Recreation Recommended Total 68,500,000 4,500,000 64,000,000 3,326,172




Page 51
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Citywide Funding for Parks Minor Capital Projects
Rank: 1
Citywide (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$1,501,777 $0 $1,501,777

SCOPE
Provide funding for communities citywide to request currently unfunded parks amenities. Parks staff would develop an application and selection process to
evaluate proposed projects to be funded under this program.


BENEFIT
The Parks and Recreation Department frequently receives requests from individuals and community organizations to add various amenities or make
improvements to existing amenities. These requests can vary from recreational equipment such as sports courts, playgrounds, and fitness equipment to
other park amenities such as water fountains, improved lighting, and shade structures. Oftentimes, funding is not available to fulfill these community
requests. This project would provide a potential source of funding for unfunded requests. This will allow community members to enjoy desired amenities and
the department to continue to be responsive to community needs.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 135,000
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 271,908 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 1,351,908
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 14,869
TOTAL PROJECT COST 298,908 297,000 297,000 297,000 297,000 1,501,777



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 52
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Esteban Park Recreation Center
Rank: 2
3345 East Roeser Road (District: 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$5,005,333 $500,000 $4,505,333

SCOPE
Design and construct a new recreation center at Esteban Park. The facility will include: a gathering area, a teen room, restrooms, storage space, a
mechanical room, office space, and a kitchen area.


BENEFIT
Esteban Park is an active regional park that includes park amenities such as open space, playgrounds, fitness equipment, a dog park, identified drone
launching area, sports courts and sports fields that support softball, soccer and football leagues. The design and construction of the new recreation center
will provide the community with additional recreation programing options for youth of all ages. Programming would include a daily after-school recreation
program, games, activities, events, educational support and family services. Currently, the closest recreation facility to Esteban Park is 2.5 miles away and is
located at Hermoso Park. The construction of this new facility will provide the opportunity for recreation programing to a part of the City that is currently
underserved.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 655,333 0 0 0 0 655,333
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 1,300,000
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 2,610,000 0 0 0 2,610,000
EQUIPMENT 0 400,900 0 0 0 400,900
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 39,100
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,955,333 3,010,900 0 0 0 5,005,333



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
Private Grant 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 225,582
CONTRACTUALS 66,560
COMMODITIES 1,680
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 2,750
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 296,572




Page 53
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

South Mountain Roadway Safety Enhancements - Phase I
Rank: 3
10919 South Central Avenue (District: 6, 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$7,695,631 $0 $7,695,631

SCOPE
Design and construct a first phase of safety improvements to the 15 miles of South Mountain Park roadways. Repave and structurally solidify the roadways
where possible.


BENEFIT
Provide a safer, more enjoyable park road system to help reduce the number of accidents and fatalities that occur within the South Mountain Park and
Preserve. Improve safety of pedestrian passage to ramadas, trailheads, and lookouts. Reduce liability and avoid more costly roadway repairs in the future.
South Mountain Park roadways are utilized by over 2.5 million yearly visitors, and approximately 40 accidents/incidents occur annually with vehicles,
pedestrians, and bicycles.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 286,400 0 0 0 0 286,400
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 874,350 0 0 0 874,350
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 4,663,200 1,798,322 0 0 6,461,522
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 73,359
TOTAL PROJECT COST 286,400 5,537,550 1,798,322 0 0 7,695,631



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 54
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Harmon Park Regional Pool and Three Splash Pad Sites
Rank: 4
Various (District: 7, 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$12,789,840 $0 $12,789,840

SCOPE
Repurpose four pools in south Phoenix to provide a regional pool at Harmon Park, and 3 splash pads at Alkire, Grant, and University Parks. The regional
pool will feature a 25-meter lap pool with dive boards, zero depth entry, water play area, swimming lesson area, water slide, shade structures, pool heater,
and playground. Construct an ADA accessible bath house with a lifeguard room for training.


BENEFIT
A regional pool at Harmon Park would allow for enhanced play features and amenities that provide recreational opportunities for residents of all ages. The
new facilities would meet or exceed current ADA requirements offering additional options and a better experience for individuals with mobility challenges or
other disabilities. Installation of a pool heater would allow programming to continue in winter months and expand opportunities to teach lifeguard certification
classes. Replacement of three pools with new splash pads provides operational cost savings while continuing to offer popular water-play options for the
surrounding neighborhoods.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 951,920 0 0 951,920
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 11,711,288 0 11,711,288
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 126,632
TOTAL PROJECT COST 0 0 951,920 11,711,288 0 12,789,840



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 274,404
CONTRACTUALS 20,256
COMMODITIES -10,836
INTERDEPARTMENTAL -4,284
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 279,540




Page 55
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Maryvale Park Regional Pool and Two Splash Pads Sites
Rank: 5
Various (District: 4, 5)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$14,367,712 $0 $14,367,712

SCOPE
Repurpose three deteriorating pools in the Maryvale area to provide a first-rate regional pool at Maryvale Park and install two new splash pads at Marivue
Park and Holiday Park. The regional pool will feature a 25-meter lap pool with dive boards, zero depth entry, interactive water play area, swimming lesson
area, water slide, shade structures, pool heater, and water playground.


BENEFIT
A regional pool at Maryvale Park would allow for enhanced play features and amenities that provide recreational opportunities for residents of all ages. The
new facilities would meet or exceed current ADA requirements offering additional options and a better experience for individuals with mobility challenges or
other disabilities. Installation of a pool heater would allow programming to continue in winter months and expand opportunities to teach lifeguard certification
classes. Replacement of two pools with new splash pads provides operational cost savings while continuing to offer popular water-play options for the
surrounding neighborhoods.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 801,920 0 0 0 0 801,920
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 13,423,536 0 0 0 13,423,536
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 142,256
TOTAL PROJECT COST 801,920 13,423,536 0 0 0 14,367,712



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 398,757
CONTRACTUALS 53,363
COMMODITIES 8,557
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 3,383
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 464,060




Page 56
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Estrella Civic Space - Phase I
Rank: 6
91st Avenue & Lower Buckeye Road (District: 7)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$12,352,835 $4,000,000 $8,352,835

SCOPE
Design and construct Phase 1 of the Estrella Village Civic Space. At completion the Estrella Village Civic Space is expected to include a 93 acre regional
park, a community center, an aquatic center, and a branch library. Phase 1 consists of the civic space master plan, regional park design, construction of 1/3
of regional park amenities, and a 20,000 square foot branch library.


BENEFIT
Initiate the park development plan envisioned when the City acquired the property in 2002. This project will increase capacity and access to recreational
amenities in an under-served location.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 279,106 0 0 0 0 279,106
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 1,165,800 0 0 0 1,165,800
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 10,828,090 0 0 10,828,090
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 79,839
TOTAL PROJECT COST 279,106 1,165,800 10,828,090 0 0 12,352,835



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
PPPI / Impact Fees 0 0 4,000,000 0 0 4,000,000



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 800,000
CONTRACTUALS 400,000
COMMODITIES 200,000
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 100,000
ON-GOING CAPITAL 100,000
TOTAL OPERATING 1,600,000




Page 57
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Desert View Civic Space - Phase I
Rank: 7
Deer Valley Drive & Tatum Boulevard (District: 2)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$8,385,263 $0 $8,385,263

SCOPE
Design and construct Phase 1 of the Desert View Village Civic Space. At completion, the Desert View Village Civic Space is expected to include a 40 acre
regional park, a community center, a branch library, and a park and ride. Phase 1 consists of the civic space master plan, regional park design, construction
of 1/2 of regional park amenities, and a 13,000 square foot branch library.


BENEFIT
Initiate the regional park development plan envisioned when the City acquired the property in 2007. This project will increase capacity and access to
recreational amenities in an under-served location.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 247,905 0 0 247,905
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 486,080 0 486,080
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 7,570,710 7,570,710
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 80,568
TOTAL PROJECT COST 0 0 247,905 486,080 7,570,710 8,385,263



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 365,000
CONTRACTUALS 156,000
COMMODITIES 32,000
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 120,000
ON-GOING CAPITAL 13,000
TOTAL OPERATING 686,000




Page 58
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Telephone Pioneers of America Park Recreation Center Improvements
Rank: 8
1946 West Morningside Drive (District: 1)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$2,204,642 $0 $2,204,642

SCOPE
Renovate the recreation center at Telephone Pioneers of America Park. Reconfigure doors and entrances, improve flooring and update restroom facilities to
comply with ADA standards, replace fire suppression and intrusion alarm systems, reconfigure landscaping to eliminate roof access, replace deteriorating
cabinets and work stations, and upgrade interior and exterior lighting.


BENEFIT
Improve accessibility to support Ability 360, a nonprofit partner that promotes programs designed to empower individuals with disabilities to help them
achieve or continue independent lifestyles within the community. Ability 360 has an operating and maintenance agreement with the City through 2028.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 343,680 0 0 0 0 343,680
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 1,839,134 0 0 0 1,839,134
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 21,828
TOTAL PROJECT COST 343,680 1,839,134 0 0 0 2,204,642



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 59
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Mountain View Community Center Sports Complex Improvements
Rank: 9
1104 East Grovers Road (District: 2, 3)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$1,193,412 $0 $1,193,412

SCOPE
Renovate the exterior sports courts at the Mountain View Community Center, including existing basketball and tennis courts, and construct 16 (or more)
pickleball courts.


BENEFIT
Increase opportunities for recreational activities. Respond to the growing demand for additional pickleball courts in the City. Extend the life of existing
basketball and tennis courts. Promote increased visitation and positive activities to help discourage vandalism and other deviant behaviors.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 1,181,596 0 0 0 0 1,181,596
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 11,816
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,181,596 0 0 0 0 1,193,412



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 60
PARKS & RECREATION
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Margaret T Hance Park Improvements
Rank: 10
67 West Culver Street (District: 7)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$3,003,555 $0 $3,003,555

SCOPE
Design and construct improvements to Margaret T Hance Park. The nature of improvements will be determined in the future in collaboration with community
and stakeholder groups.


BENEFIT
These projects will improve the continued service delivery to the public and Margaret T Hance Park will continue to attract and host prominent events.
Additionally, the regional park will provide expected service to the growing residential population in the downtown corridor.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 2,473,817 0 0 0 2,473,817
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 29,738
TOTAL PROJECT COST 500,000 2,473,817 0 0 0 3,003,555



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 61
PUBLIC SAFETY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council


Rank Project Name Total Cost Other Funds GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost
1 Fire Station 7 / Community Assistance Program (7th Street & Hatcher 21,408,057 0 21,408,057 3,727,000
Road)
Location: 7th Street & Hatcher Road
District: 3
2 Fire Station 13 / Community Assistance Program (44th Street & Thomas 21,753,090 0 21,753,090 3,727,000
Road)
Location: 44th Street & Thomas Road
District: 6, 8
3 Fire Station 15 / Community Assistance Program (45th Avenue & 21,408,055 0 21,408,055 3,727,000
Camelback Road)
Location: 45th Avenue & Camelback Road
District: 5
4 Cactus Park Precinct Replacement 37,338,657 0 37,338,657 0
Location: TBD
District: 1
5 Fire Station 51 (51st Avenue & SR 303) 24,577,682 6,000,000 18,577,682 7,529,000
Location: 51st Avenue & SR 303
District: 1
6 Police Property Management Warehouse Renovation 9,027,896 0 9,027,896 0
Location: 100 East Elwood Street
District: 7
7 Maryvale Police Precinct Renovation 2,986,563 0 2,986,563 0
Location: 6180 West Encanto Boulevard
District: 4, 5, 7

Public Safety Recommended Total 138,500,000 6,000,000 132,500,000 18,710,000




Page 62
PUBLIC SAFETY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Fire Station 7 / Community Assistance Program (7th Street & Hatcher Road)
Rank: 1
7th Street & Hatcher Road (District: 3)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$21,408,057 $0 $21,408,057

SCOPE
Replace and upgrade Fire Station #7. Acquire 3 acres of land in the vicinity of 7th Street and Hatcher Road. Construct a new 18,000 square foot, 4-bay fire
station to support additional emergency response personnel and equipment. Acquire 2 new apparatus (1 pumper and 1 rescue vehicle). The existing fire
station building will be retained and utilized to support the Community Assistance Program.


BENEFIT
Reduce response times within this station’s area of responsibility by providing sufficient apparatus and staffing to respond to current and anticipated future
service calls. Mitigate service impacts on neighboring stations by reducing redirection of resources. Current call volume is 57% above industry standards.
Provide a facility for the Community Assistance Program.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 82,895 0 0 0 0 82,895
REAL PROPERTY 4,467,840 0 0 0 0 4,467,840
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 1,317,440 0 0 0 0 1,317,440
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 13,115,250 0 0 0 13,115,250
EQUIPMENT 0 2,133,414 0 0 0 2,133,414
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 146,891
PERCENT FOR ART 144,327
TOTAL PROJECT COST 5,868,175 15,395,555 0 0 0 21,408,057



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 3,318,000
CONTRACTUALS 270,000
COMMODITIES 60,000
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 79,000
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 3,727,000




Page 63
PUBLIC SAFETY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Fire Station 13 / Community Assistance Program (44th Street & Thomas Road)
Rank: 2
44th Street & Thomas Road (District: 6, 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$21,753,090 $0 $21,753,090

SCOPE
Replace and upgrade Fire Station #13. Acquire 3 acres of land in the vicinity of 44th Street and Thomas Road. Construct a new 18,000 square foot, 4-bay
fire station to support additional emergency response personnel and equipment. Acquire 2 new apparatus (1 pumper and 1 rescue vehicle). The existing fire
station building will be retained and utilized to support the Community Assitance Program.


BENEFIT
Reduce response times within this station’s area of responsibility by providing sufficient apparatus and staffing to respond to current and anticipated future
service calls. Mitigate service impacts on neighboring stations by reducing redirection of resources. Current call volume is 43% above industry standards.
Provide a facility for the Community Assistance Program.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 83,491 0 0 0 0 83,491
REAL PROPERTY 4,467,840 0 0 0 0 4,467,840
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 1,340,670 0 0 0 1,340,670
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 13,386,375 0 0 13,386,375
EQUIPMENT 0 0 2,177,517 0 0 2,177,517
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 149,927 0 0 149,927
PERCENT FOR ART 147,270
TOTAL PROJECT COST 4,551,331 1,340,670 15,713,819 0 0 21,753,090



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 3,318,000
CONTRACTUALS 270,000
COMMODITIES 60,000
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 79,000
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 3,727,000




Page 64
PUBLIC SAFETY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Fire Station 15 / Community Assistance Program (45th Avenue & Camelback Road)
Rank: 3
45th Avenue & Camelback Road (District: 5)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$21,408,055 $0 $21,408,055

SCOPE
Replace and upgrade Fire Station #15. Acquire 3 acres of land in the vicinity of 45th Avenue and Camelback Road. Construct a new 18,000 square foot, 4-
bay fire station to support additional emergency response personnel and equipment. Acquire 2 new apparatus (1 pumper and 1 rescue vehicle). The existing
fire station building will be retained and utilized to support the Community Assistance Program.


BENEFIT
Reduce response times within this station’s area of responsibility by providing sufficient apparatus and staffing to respond to current and anticipated future
service calls. Mitigate service impacts on neighboring stations by reducing redirection of resources. Current call volume is 51% above industry standards.
Provide a facility for the Community Assistance Program.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 82,893 0 0 0 0 82,893
REAL PROPERTY 4,467,840 0 0 0 0 4,467,840
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 1,317,440 0 0 0 0 1,317,440
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 13,115,250 0 0 0 13,115,250
EQUIPMENT 0 2,133,414 0 0 0 2,133,414
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 146,891
PERCENT FOR ART 144,327
TOTAL PROJECT COST 5,868,173 15,395,555 0 0 0 21,408,055



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 3,318,000
CONTRACTUALS 270,000
COMMODITIES 60,000
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 79,000
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 3,727,000




Page 65
PUBLIC SAFETY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Cactus Park Precinct Replacement
Rank: 4
TBD (District: 1)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$37,338,657 $0 $37,338,657

SCOPE
Relocate the Cactus Park Police Precinct. Acquire 10 acres in a suitable location, including sufficient land for a future relocation of the Northern Command
Center. Construct the following facilities: 13,225 square foot precinct, 4,100 square foot mechanic shop with an attached firearm training facility, and solar
covered parking. Demolish the existing precinct facility.


BENEFIT
Modernize and improve police operations and training facilities to ensure officers and staff are well-equipped to serve the Cactus Park Precinct and respond
to community needs. Extend the life of police vehicles and reduce energy consumption by providing solar covered parking. The current precinct location at
the NEC of 39th Avenue and Cactus Road may be repurposed as the future site of Fire Station #70.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 14,957,454 0 0 0 0 14,957,454
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 1,702,366 0 0 0 1,702,366
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 17,796,390 0 935,731 18,732,121
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 1,657,718 0 1,657,718
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 84,653 84,653
PERCENT FOR ART 204,345
TOTAL PROJECT COST 14,957,454 1,702,366 17,796,390 1,657,718 1,020,384 37,338,657



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 66
PUBLIC SAFETY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Fire Station 51 (51st Avenue & SR 303)
Rank: 5
51st Avenue & SR 303 (District: 1)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$24,577,682 $6,000,000 $18,577,682

SCOPE
Construct new Fire Station #51. Acquire 3 acres of land in the vicinity of 51st Avenue and SR 303. Construct a new 20,000 square foot, 5-bay fire station.
Acquire 5 new fire apparatus (1 ladder, 1 ladder tender, 1 pumper, 1 hazardous material support vehicle and 1 rescue vehicle), as well as 1 new battalion
chief vehicle.


BENEFIT
Provide the emergency response resources needed to serve the technology park developing on the north side of SR 303, as well as future residential
development anticipated west of I-17. Mitigate service impacts on neighboring stations by reducing redirection of resources.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 89,448 0 0 0 0 89,448
REAL PROPERTY 2,749,440 0 0 0 0 2,749,440
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 1,457,250 0 0 0 1,457,250
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 14,873,750 0 0 14,873,750
EQUIPMENT 0 0 5,065,999 0 0 5,065,999
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 178,485 0 0 178,485
PERCENT FOR ART 163,310
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2,838,888 1,457,250 20,118,234 0 0 24,577,682



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
IMPACT FEES / FED 1,000,000 0 5,000,000 0 0 6,000,000



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 7,001,000
CONTRACTUALS 300,000
COMMODITIES 60,000
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 168,000
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 7,529,000




Page 67
PUBLIC SAFETY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Police Property Management Warehouse Renovation
Rank: 6
100 East Elwood Street (District: 7)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$9,027,896 $0 $9,027,896

SCOPE
Renovate the Police Property Management Warehouse and secure the property for vehicle evidence currently stored at a different location. Construct a
1,600 square foot administrative building for the vehicle lot. Update and improve aging evidence preservation and storage equipment and spaces to optimize
space utilization and provide a visitor lobby.


BENEFIT
Ensure crime scene evidence is preserved and protected consistent with industry standards. Maintain existing public facilities and mechanical systems to
reduce service disruptions and avoid costs of replacement in the future.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 487,500 1,884,000 0 0 0 2,371,500
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 1,822,041 1,740,472 3,004,498 0 0 6,567,011
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 89,385
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2,309,541 3,624,472 3,004,498 0 0 9,027,896



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 68
PUBLIC SAFETY
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Maryvale Police Precinct Renovation
Rank: 7
6180 West Encanto Boulevard (District: 4, 5, 7)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$2,986,563 $0 $2,986,563

SCOPE
Renovate and update the Maryvale Police Precinct.


BENEFIT
Extend the functional life of critical equipment and building systems at the Maryvale Police Precinct building. Improve the functionality of the building to
ensure officers and staff are well-equipped to serve the Maryvale Precinct and respond to community needs. Ensure continuity of service by reducing the
potential for failure of equipment and/or building systems.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 1,721,229 1,235,764 0 0 0 2,956,993
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 29,570
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,721,229 1,235,764 0 0 0 2,986,563



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 69
STREETS & STORM DRAINAGE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council


Rank Project Name Total Cost Other Funds GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost
1 Vision Zero Implementation 16,922,765 0 16,922,765 258,393
Location: Citywide
District: Citywide
2 Equity Based Transportation Mobility - T2050 Mobility Implementation 12,570,371 0 12,570,371 127,343
Location: Various
District: Citywide
3 Laveen Flood Mitigation 23,384,187 15,153,786 8,230,401 0
Location: Various
District: 7
4 Pavement Maintenance Supplement 22,030,869 0 22,030,869 0
Location: Citywide
District: Citywide
5 Hohokam Drainage Program 54,708,715 35,463,121 19,245,594 0
Location: Baseline Road to Dobbins Road & 14th Street to 21st Street
District: 8
6 Storm Drain Replacement Program 2,500,000 0 2,500,000 0
Location: Various
District: Citywide

Streets & Storm Drainage Recommended Total 132,116,907 50,616,907 81,500,000 385,736




Page 70
STREETS & STORM DRAINAGE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Vision Zero Implementation
Rank: 1
Citywide (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$16,922,765 $0 $16,922,765

SCOPE
Supplement the Council-approved Road Safety Action Plan and leverage various Federal funding opportunities toward becoming a Vision Zero City. Identify,
design, and implement roadway safety countermeasures that address locations and behaviors related to fatal and serious injury accidents.


BENEFIT
Improve roadway safety with a specific emphasis on projects that reduce serious vehicle collisions. Recognition as a Vision Zero City will help raise
awareness of roadway safety projects and promote the goal of eliminating serious injuries and fatalities on Phoenix roadways.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 300,000 300,000 300,000 0 0 900,000
REAL PROPERTY 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0 300,000
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 700,000 700,000 700,000 0 0 2,100,000
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,467,094 0 13,467,094
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 155,671
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,100,000 5,600,000 5,600,000 4,467,094 0 16,922,765



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 245,893
CONTRACTUALS 4,700
COMMODITIES 7,800
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 258,393




Page 71
STREETS & STORM DRAINAGE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Equity Based Transportation Mobility - T2050 Mobility Implementation
Rank: 2
Various (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$12,570,371 $0 $12,570,371

SCOPE
Design and construct recommended mobility improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, ADA ramps, streetlights, traffic calming, safe HAWK crossings,
traffic signals, and tree/shade landscaping. Low Impact Development and Green Infrastructure may be considered in the design of these projects.


BENEFIT
Accelerate implementation of mobility projects that support historically disadvantaged communities where access to safe transportation options is limited.
Equity-based mobility projects take into account the prevalence of zero-car households, areas of persistent poverty, school areas with a high rate of walking
enrollment, high daily bus boardings, high bike-on-bus boardings, ADA non-accessible and non-compliant bus stops, streets and intersections that have a
high number of crashes between vehicles and people walking and riding bicycles, gaps in the bikeway network, areas that lack pedestrian crossing signals.
Completed mobility projects will address hazards, reduce roadway user stress, and improve multi-model connectivity. Improved access to safe transportation
options will help reduce socio-economic inequities that are more pronounced in underserved and disadvantaged neighborhoods.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 1,000,000 1,000,000 611,478 0 0 2,611,478
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 4,000,000 4,000,000 1,834,434 0 9,834,434
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 124,459
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,000,000 5,000,000 4,611,478 1,834,434 0 12,570,371



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 117,053
CONTRACTUALS 2,790
COMMODITIES 3,900
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 3,600
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 127,343




Page 72
STREETS & STORM DRAINAGE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Laveen Flood Mitigation
Rank: 3
Various (District: 7)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$23,384,187 $15,153,786 $8,230,401

SCOPE
Implement drainage mitigation options to reduce flood impacts in four areas of Laveen. These projects were recommended in the 2022 Laveen Area
Drainage Feasibility Study.


BENEFIT
Provide flood protection to existing homes and other structures. Leverage cost share opportunities with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County for
final design and construction.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 229,120 0 0 0 0 229,120
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 2,892,647 0 0 2,892,647
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 2,940,148 0 0 0 2,940,148
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 10,059,426 7,192,175 17,251,601
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 70,671
TOTAL PROJECT COST 229,120 2,940,148 2,892,647 10,059,426 7,192,175 23,384,187



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
FCDMC 148,928 1,911,096 1,880,221 6,538,627 4,674,914 15,153,786



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 73
STREETS & STORM DRAINAGE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Pavement Maintenance Supplement
Rank: 4
Citywide (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$22,030,869 $0 $22,030,869

SCOPE
Supplement the Accelerated Pavement Maintenance Program with additional funding for neighborhood street mill and overlay projects at an estimated $1
million per residential quarter section.


BENEFIT
Local street mill and overlay helps preserve neighborhood character and quality. Well-maintained roads are safer, quieter and reduce wear and tear on
vehicles. This proposal would reduce deferred maintenance needs and degradation of neighborhood streets.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 7,812,742 7,000,000 7,000,000 0 0 21,812,742
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 218,127
TOTAL PROJECT COST 7,812,742 7,000,000 7,000,000 0 0 22,030,869



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 74
STREETS & STORM DRAINAGE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Hohokam Drainage Program
Rank: 5
Baseline Road to Dobbins Road & 14th Street to 21st Street (District: 8)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$54,708,715 $35,463,121 $19,245,594

SCOPE
Implement the Hohokam Area Drainage Master Plan that was prepared in collaboration with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County. Design and
construct a series of storm sewer drainage basins and pipes that extends the storm drainage system in the area south of Baseline Road to Dobbins Road,
and 14th Street to 21st Street.


BENEFIT
Provide flood protection to existing homes and other structures. Reduce roadway safety hazards that result during storm events. Leverage cost share
opportunities with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County for final design and construction.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 1,116,960 0 0 0 0 1,116,960
REAL PROPERTY 0 5,228,613 5,336,702 0 0 10,565,315
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 3,485,742 2,668,946 0 0 6,154,688
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 18,167,240 18,554,445 36,721,685
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 150,067
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1,116,960 8,714,355 8,005,648 18,167,240 18,554,445 54,708,715



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
FCDMC 726,024 5,664,331 5,203,671 11,808,706 12,060,389 35,463,121



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 75
STREETS & STORM DRAINAGE
2023 GO Bond Program
Executive Committee Recommendations to City Council
Project Detail

Storm Drain Replacement Program
Rank: 6
Various (District: Citywide)

TOTAL PROJECT COST OTHER FUNDING GO BOND FUNDING
$2,500,000 $0 $2,500,000

SCOPE
Replace deteriorating metal storm drain pipe with new reinforced concrete pipe. Approximately one to two miles of pipe would be replaced each year.


BENEFIT
Much of the street stormwater system was built more than 30 years ago with corrugated metal pipe, which has deteriorated and is past its useful life.
Failures of the piping have led to reactive responses with numerous sink holes occurring in City streets that result in disruption to traffic, as well as safety
issues. Not funding this project will result in additional damage to City streets, flooding in neighborhoods, and potential claims against the City due to
property damage and potential loss of human life.



COST ELEMENTS 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
STUDY 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 2,500,000
REAL PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0
DESIGN / ENGINEERING 0 0 0 0 0 0
CONSTRUCTION / DEMO 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0
MOVE-IN EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0
PERCENT FOR ART 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 2,500,000



OTHER FUNDING 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 5-YR TOTAL
N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0



ON-GOING EXPENSES ANNUAL COST
STAFF 0
CONTRACTUALS 0
COMMODITIES 0
INTERDEPARTMENTAL 0
ON-GOING CAPITAL 0
TOTAL OPERATING 0




Page 76
Attachment B

2023 GO Bond Program
Subcommittee Recommendations to Executive Committee
Project Summary

Arts & Culture Subcommittee Recommendations

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Latino Cultural Center 7 21,729,054 512,216
2 Valley Youth Theatre - Permanent Home Project 7 14,089,510 271,040
3 Children's Museum of Phoenix Expansion 8 5,399,584 105,230
4 Phoenix Center for the Arts Theater Improvements 7 1,200,000 0
5 Phoenix Theatre Company ADA Accesssibility 4 5,800,000 0
6 Arizona Jewish Historical Society Renovation & Expansion Project 7 2,020,000 0
7 Symphony Hall Theatrical Venue Improvements 7 5,663,232 0
8 Herberger Theater Center - Theatrical Improvements 7 3,291,084 0
9 Cultural Facilities Critical Equipment Replacements Citywide 5,000,000 0

Arts & Culture Recommended Total 64,192,464 888,486

Compare to Capital Needs Study Prioritized Project Total 56,057,465
Compare to City Manager's Recommended Target 50,000,000




Economic Development & Education Subcommittee Recommendations

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Rio Reimagined Land Acquisition 7, 8 23,500,000 0
2 ASU Health Technology Center Citywide 15,000,000 0
3 Spark Area Land Acquisition - Reuse and Redevelopment Strategy Implementation 8 2,500,000 0
4 Economic Development Public Infrastructure Citywide 5,050,000 0

Economic Development & Education Recommended Total 46,050,000 0

Compare to Capital Needs Study Prioritized Project Total 23,500,000
Compare to City Manager's Recommended Target 38,000,000




Environment & Sustainability Subcommittee Recommendations

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy Upgrades at City Facilities Citywide 13,500,000 0
2 Heat Resiliency Citywide 7,300,000 171,053
3 City Brownfields Redevelopment Projects Citywide 3,000,000 0
4 City Facility Vehicle Electrification Stations Citywide 1,300,000 20,000

Environment & Sustainability Recommended Total 25,100,000 191,053

Compare to Capital Needs Study Prioritized Project Total 25,134,753
Compare to City Manager's Recommended Target 26,000,000




Page 77
2023 GO Bond Program
Subcommittee Recommendations to Executive Committee
Project Summary

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness Subcommittee Recommendations

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Affordable Housing Property Preservation - Phase 1 Citywide 33,010,113 0
2 Cesar Chavez Senior Center 7, 8 5,707,191 331,705
3 McDowell Senior Center Renovation 8 1,765,118 0
4 Acquisition/Renovation of Property for Shelter Citywide 22,500,000 8,000,000
5 Choice Neighborhoods Housing Development Gap Funding 8 21,217,878 0
6 Innovation in Affordable Housing Program Citywide 1,000,000 0
7 Affordable Housing Development Gap Financing Citywide 10,000,000 0
8 Expansion of The Parsons Center for Health and Wellness 7 6,886,955 0

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness Recommended Total 102,087,255 8,331,705

Compare to Capital Needs Study Prioritized Project Total 61,738,582
Compare to City Manager's Recommended Target 63,000,000




Neighborhoods & City Services Subcommittee Recommendations

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Branch Library at Estrella Civic Space - 13,000 7 8,574,460 856,621
2 City Facility ADA Improvements Citywide 10,100,000 0
3 Yucca Branch Library Expansion 5 10,626,991 1,288,064
4 Branch Library at Desert View Civic Space - 13,000 2 10,313,210 856,621
5 Historic Preservation Programs Citywide 5,000,000 0
6 City Service Center Property Improvements 2, 5, 7, 8 5,050,000 0
7 Downtown City Property Improvements 7 5,050,000 0

Neighborhoods & City Services Recommended Total 54,714,661 3,001,306

Compare to Capital Needs Study Prioritized Project Total 52,440,459
Compare to City Manager's Recommended Target 45,000,000




Parks & Recreation Subcommittee Recommendations

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Citywide Funding for Parks Minor Capital Projects Citywide 1,500,000 0
2 Esteban Park Recreation Center 8 5,000,000 296,572
3 South Mountain Roadway Safety Enhancements 6, 8 10,686,522 0
4 Margaret T Hance Park Improvements 7 17,835,428 0
5 Harmon Park Regional Pool and Three Splash Pad Sites 8 12,774,702 279,540
6 Maryvale Park Regional Pool and Two Splash Pads Sites 5 14,350,706 464,060
7 Grant Park Historic Bathhouse Renovation 8 1,600,000 119,803
8 Estrella Civic Space - Phase 1 7 12,342,949 1,600,000




Page 78
2023 GO Bond Program
Subcommittee Recommendations to Executive Committee
Project Summary

Parks & Recreation Subcommittee Recommendations

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

9 Desert View Civic Space - Phase 1 2 8,375,338 686,000
10 Telephone Pioneers of America Park Recreation Center Improvements 1 2,202,033 0
11 Mountain View Community Center Sports Complex Improvements 2, 3 1,191,999 0
12 Sweetwater Park Improvements 3 1,500,000 0
13 South Phoenix Youth Center Improvements 8 3,173,016 0
14 South Mountain Community Center Renovations 7 4,586,805 0
15 Rio Salado Embankment Erosion Control 7, 8 4,582,989 0
16 Pueblo Grande Museum and Archaeologic Park Improvements 8 5,306,980 0
17 Washington Activity Center Renovations 5 2,643,999 0

Parks & Recreation Recommended Total 109,653,466 3,445,975

Compare to Capital Needs Study Prioritized Project Total 108,962,874
Compare to City Manager's Recommended Target 64,000,000




Public Safety Subcommittee Recommendations

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Fire Station 7 / Community Assistance Program (7th Avenue & Hatcher Road) 3 21,370,986 3,727,000
2 Fire Station 13 / Community Assistance Program (44th Street & Thomas Road) 6, 8 21,715,423 3,727,000
3 Fire Station 15 / Community Assistance Program (45th Avenue & Camelback Road) 5 21,370,986 3,727,000
4 Cactus Park Precinct & Northern Command Center Relocation 1 49,459,259 0
5 Fire Station 51 (51st Avenue & SR 303) 1 18,545,514 7,529,000
6 Police Property Management Warehouse Renovation 7 9,012,264 0
7 New Fire Station 70 / Community Assistance Program (39th Avenue & Cactus Road) 1 17,906,029 3,727,000
8 Maryvale Police Precinct Renovations 4, 5, 7 2,981,392 0
9 New Fire Station 74 (19th Avenue & Chandler Boulevard) 6 10,292,151 2,593,000
10 Fire Station 20 (7th Avenue & Glendale Road) 3 18,194,942 5,026,000

Public Safety Recommended Total 190,848,946 30,056,000

Compare to Capital Needs Study Prioritized Project Total 158,264,630
Compare to City Manager's Recommended Target 132,500,000




Streets & Storm Drainage Subcommittee Recommendations

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

1 Vision Zero Implementation Citywide 26,711,479 258,393
2 Equity Based Transportation Mobility - T2050 Mobility Implementation Citywide 20,170,000 127,343
3 Laveen Flood Mitigation Projects 7 8,230,401 0
4 Pavement Maintenance Supplement Citywide 35,350,000 0




Page 79
2023 GO Bond Program
Subcommittee Recommendations to Executive Committee
Project Summary

Streets & Storm Drainage Subcommittee Recommendations

Rank Project Name District(s) GO Bond Funds Ongoing Cost

5 Hohokam Drainage Program 8 19,245,594 0
6 Storm Drain Replacement Program Citywide 14,392,500 0

Streets & Storm Drainage Recommended Total 124,099,974 385,736

Compare to Capital Needs Study Prioritized Project Total 160,634,711
Compare to City Manager's Recommended Target 81,500,000




All Subcommittees Recommended Total 716,746,766 46,300,261




Page 80
Attachment C




To: General Obligation Bond Committee Date: October 25, 2022


From: Christine Mackay
Community and Economic Development Director

Subject: GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND – ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES



The Community and Economic Development Department has several alternative
funding sources that are currently utilized for Economic Development Public
Infrastructure projects. The following funding sources are earmarked for public
infrastructure related projects within the 22-23 Fiscal Year budget and over the next five
years of the Capital Improvement Program. These sources are largely committed
through the next five years, but broadly provide funding for a range of public
improvements including, but not exclusive of: water lines, sewer lines, landscaping,
pedestrian paths, trash cans, streetlights, and educational facilities.

 Approximately $33,000,000, committed over five years, in the Downtown
Community Reinvestment Fund, Capital Investment Program
 Approximately $7,000,000, committed over five years, in the Strategic Economic
Development Fund, Capital Investment Program
 $2,000,000 of one-time ARPA funding




Page 81
To: General Obligation Bond Committee Date: October 26, 2022

From: Alan Stephenson
Deputy City Manager

Subject: Alternative Funding Sources – Historic Preservation Grants

Planning Department – Historic Preservation
Grant Program Annual Funding Amount Owner match of Source
award amount

Residential – $200,000 50% General Fund
Exterior Rehabilitation

Residential/Commercial – $500,000 50% General Fund
Threatened Building


for the 2021/2022 fiscal year – the funds were reauthorized for 2022/2023.

Funding for the Threatened Building Grant program, which can be used for residential or commercial
properties, was authorized by City Council in 2021 in the amount of $500,000 for the 2022/2023 fiscal
year.




Page
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, 82 85003 • 602‐261‐8699 • historic@phoenix.gov
Arizona
To: General Obligation Bond Committee Date: October 26, 2022


From: Gina Montes
Deputy City Manager

Subject: ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES – AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND
HOMELESSNESS PROJECTS

Twelve projects, totaling $88.93 million, have been earmarked with funding through the
City’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Strategic Plan; the Community Development
Block Grant Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CDBG-CV); HOME
Investment Partnerships Program – America Rescue Plan (HOME – ARP); Arizona
Department of Housing (ADOH); and the Housing Department’s current fiscal year (FY
2022-23) Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and operating expense budget to address
affordable housing and homelessness infrastructure. Some are already implemented,
and others are undergoing contract and/or design discussions. The projects are listed
below and are categorized by department.

Homeless Solutions

Allocation Project

$17,400,000 Hotel Acquisition and Renovation for Future Permanent
Supportive Housing (ARPA)
$17.4 million in funding is available for the acquisition and
renovation of a hotel to convert to permanent supportive
housing for people experiencing homelessness. A location or
partner for this potential project has not yet been identified.


$7,000,000 Sprung Structure II and Non-Congregate Emergency
Shelter (ADOH)
ADOH is in the process of committing funding for the
development and operation of a Sprung Structure and non-
congregate shelter on a City-owned parcel. The project will
have a workforce component that will be operated by St.
Vincent de Paul and will allow shelter residents the option of
obtaining immediate employment opportunities upon entering



Page 83
shelter. An anticipated 200 congregate beds and 25-50 non-
congregate beds will be available by June 2023.


$8,100,00 Hotel Lease for Emergency Shelter (ARPA)
In partnership with Community Bridges, Inc, the City is funding
a lease/purchase agreement for a 117-room hotel to be used
as emergency shelter. Additional acquisition funding is
committed from Maricopa County. The lease of the hotel
begins Nov. 1, 2022, and the acquisition will occur after a
Special Use Permit is approved, within six months of the start
of the lease.

$6,000,000 St. Vincent de Paul, Ozanam Manor II (ARPA)
In partnership with Maricopa County, Arizona Department of
Housing, and St. Vincent de Paul the City is assisting in
funding the construction of a new 100-bed transitional housing
facility for individuals experiencing homelessness. The facility
will be owned by St. Vincent de Paul and located adjacent to
their Watkins campus. This project is scheduled to be
operational by March 2024.


$4,000,000 Community Bridges, Inc. North Mountain Healing Center
(CDBG-CV)
This project is a partnership with Maricopa County and
Community Bridges, Inc. to acquire and rehabilitate a
commercial building in the North Phoenix/Sunnyslope area to
be used as a 100-person emergency shelter. The shelter will
be limited to individuals experiencing homelessness in
neighborhoods surrounding the facility. The shelter is
scheduled to be operational by June 2023.

$4,000,000 Central Arizona Shelter Services, The Haven (CDBG-CV)
This project is a partnership between Arizona Department of
Housing, Central Arizona Shelter Services, and CASS to
acquire and renovate a hotel for use as shelter for seniors
aged 55 and above and will serve up to 170 people nightly.
The shelter is scheduled to be operational by June 2023.

$2,000,000 UMOM Family Shelter (CDBG-CV)
This project includes the renovation of an existing office
building on the UMOM family shelter campus to increase the
number by family shelter units by 20, which is estimated to add
80 total beds at the shelter. The Neighborhood Services
Department will seek Council approval for this project on Nov.
16.



Page 84
$6,000,000 Salvation Army Family Shelter (CDBG-CV and CDBG)
This project includes the new construction of an additional
family shelter building on the Salvation Army campus to
increase the number by family shelter units by 12, which is
estimated to add 60 total beds at the shelter. The
Neighborhood Services Department will seek Council approval
for this project on Nov. 16.

Housing

Allocation Project

$16,420,000 Acquisition/Renovation of Property for Shelter (HOME-
ARP)
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
awarded federal funds to the Housing Department of $21.35
million of HOME-ARP in 2021. These funds help support
various populations such as: homeless, at-risk of
homelessness, fleeing/attempting to flee domestic violence,
dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, human trafficking, or
households having high risk of housing instability.

Based on input received through stakeholder consultation and
public participation processes the Housing Department plans
to use a portion of HOME-ARP funds for allowable activities
including:

 $8.21 million for non-congregate shelter; and
 $8.21 million for rental housing units.

$12,000,000 Affordable Housing Program (ARPA)
As eligible by federal guidance, staff is moving forward to
create and preserve more affordable housing in Phoenix by
providing gap financing to developers. Staff will return to City
Council with more details.

$5,000,000 Community Land Trust Program (ARPA)
A Community Land Trust (CLT) creates permanent affordable
housing by purchasing or developing homes which are then
sold to low- and moderate-income households. This allocation
will allow staff to fund an all-inclusive CLT and include
acquisition, housing development, rehabilitation, and down
payment assistance.




Page 85
$1,013,000 Affordable Housing Property Preservation (Housing CIP
and Operating)
The Housing Department has a Fiscal Year 2022-23 adopted
CIP and operating expense budget for construction, materials,
and minor maintenance of $1.01 million to preserve the
affordable housing portfolio.




Page 86
To: General Obligation Bond Committee Date: October 26, 2022


From: Joe Giudice
Public Works Director

Subject: GO BOND - ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCES

The Public Works Department has the following Programs for consideration by the
Executive Bond Committee for General Obligation Bonds:

• Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy Upgrades at City Facilities
• City Facility ADA Improvements
• City Service Center Property Improvements
• Downtown City Property Improvements

The memo will describe other CIP or operating funding sources budgeted to provide
funding in the referenced program areas.

Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy Upgrades at City Facilities

The Public Works Department has a CIP budget of $500,000 annually to invest in
energy efficiency projects using General Fund resources. For fiscal year 2022-2023, an
additional $3 million was programmed for this purpose as a one-time additional
investment of capital funds. The expected CIP funds for future fiscal years is $500,000.

City Facility ADA Improvements

There is $500,000 budgeted annually in the CIP to perform City Facility ADA
Assessments using General Fund resources. In the event a CIP is in progress as a
result of other funds, any ADA deficiencies identified during the scope of that project are
addressed through those project funds.

City Service Center and Downtown Property Improvements

In fiscal year 2019-2020, a CIP Major Maintenance Fund was established to address
substantial deferred maintenance issues that were identified as a citywide program to
address urgent needs. The fund is budgeted with $13 million annually using General
Fund resources. Projects to be funded are identified by a scoring matrix that evaluates
the likelihood of system failure and the degree of impact or risk from system failure. The
majority of projects funded through the first few years of this program have been to



Page 87
address critical fire life safety building systems. It is important to note that the $13
million program is for projects across all city departments.

From the $13 million in annual funds from this program, approximately $1 million
annually is used to perform facility condition assessments.

The Public Works Department also maintains $1.5 million for annual minor maintenance
in the General Fund Operating Budget to perform small project repairs in Public Works
facilities.




Page 88
To: General Obligation Bond Committee Date: October 26, 2022


From: Kini L.E. Knudson
Street Transportation Director

RE: Alternative Funding Sources – General Obligation Bond Projects

Based on the City’s approved Five-Year (FY2023 through FY2027) Capital Improvement Program (CIP), this memo
provides information on any approved funding levels utilizing alternative funding sources (non-General Obligation
Bond funding) to support the following proposed General Obligation (GO) Bond projects:
• Equity-Based Transportation Mobility
• Pavement Maintenance
• Vision Zero

Equity-Based Transportation Mobility
The Street Transportation Department (Streets) receives an allocation of 13.8% of Transportation 2050 (T2050)
funding, which is a seven-tenths of a cent sales tax that began on January 1, 2016 and expires on December 31,
2050. To meet the street-related goals of T2050, Streets utilizes T2050 funding to support four sub-program areas:
Pavement Maintenance, New and Major Streets, Mobility Improvements, and Technology Enhancements. The
Equity-Based Transportation Mobility GO Bond project is linked to the T2050 Mobility Improvements sub-program.
Any GO Bond funding allocated to the Equity-Based Transportation Mobility project would leverage existing T2050
funding level for the T2050 Mobility Improvements sub-program.

As outlined below, Streets has $1,066,000 in T2050 funding programmed in the CIP over the next five years for
Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Improvements.

Funding FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 Total
T2050 Pedestrian and Bicycle
Mobility $0 $ 53,000 $ 666,000 $ 294,000 $ 981,000 $ 1,066,000

Pavement Maintenance

To maintain Phoenix’s 5,000 miles of streets, funding is provided within Streets’ CIP to support implementation of
the City’s Pavement Maintenance Program, which utilizes a pavement management system methodology to assess,
plan, and program streets for maintenance. Utilizing objective data on pavement condition, treatment costs, and
available funding, a variety of surface treatments are utilized to both restore streets to good condition and keep good
streets in good condition.

The proposed GO Bond funding for pavement maintenance is for residential streets, which comes from the Arizona
Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF). HURF funding is used for maintenance of streets classified as locals and
minor collectors. As outlined below, Streets has $ 206,438,193 in HURF funding programmed in the CIP over the
next five years for pavement maintenance on residential streets.

Funding FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 Total
HURF $ 34,538,193 $ 41,655,000 $ 43,415,000 $ 43,415,000 $ 43,415,000 $ 206,438,193
Residential



Transportation 2050 funds are used for pavement maintenance on streets classified as arterials and major
collectors. These funds could also be used for pavement maintenance on residential streets if Council were to


Page 89
redirect these funds from pavement maintenance projects on arterials and major collectors. The T2050 funds for
arterials and major collectors is shown below:

Funding FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 Total
T2050 $ 42,795,578 $ 24,790,000 $ 24,790,000 $ 25,790,000 $ 26,790,000 $ 144,955,578
Arterials &
Major
Collectors

The proposed GO Bond funding for pavement maintenance is intended to supplement currently programmed
funding to ensure acceptable pavement conditions can be maintained throughout the City.

Vision Zero
On September 7, 2022, Council unanimously approved the City’s Vision Zero Road Safety Action Plan (RSAP), and
allocated $10 million annually across three funding sources (City’s General Fund, HURF, and T2050) to implement
the RSAP.

As outlined below, Streets has $ 50,000,000 in combined General Fund, HURF and T2050 funding programmed in
the CIP over the next five years for Vision Zero.

Funding FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 Total
General $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 15,000,000
Fund
HURF $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 25,000,000
T2050 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 10,000,000
Total $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 50,000,000

In addition, Phoenix has applied for a federal grant through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which if
awarded would provide an additional $30 million in roadway safety funding. Given the vast needs in these areas, all
of these sources are needed to help reach the City’s Vision Zero goal of zero roadway deaths by 2040.




Page 90
ÿ
ÿ
234ÿ 567689ÿ 97ÿ7ÿ66ÿ 66ÿ 4ÿ  68ÿÿ!ÿ
ÿ
"#3$4ÿ % 68ÿ& 9'7ÿ6ÿ(ÿ)6'698*ÿ+868ÿ
ÿ
,-./04ÿ51)%2ÿ235%431ÿ 1+ÿ5) 6475) 5)%8ÿ9%2315ÿ
ÿ
ÿ 9  66ÿ866797'ÿÿ*6ÿ66ÿ 66ÿ76ÿ*ÿ'7ÿ
;8<6'ÿ97ÿ77=';6>ÿ;889'?ÿ8'ÿ;8<6'@ÿ'ÿ6'96'ÿ986ÿ>6ÿ97ÿ977ÿ
6ÿ9<'6ÿA*ÿ;86*67'6ÿ';6ÿ86'7'?ÿ8'ÿ;889'ÿ986ÿ'99 6ÿÿ
98'ÿ6866'ÿ'*ÿ*9ÿ*6ÿ66ÿ66ÿÿ;8;'6ÿ7ÿ86ÿ8ÿ6''ÿ
>ÿ*6ÿ9BÿBÿ9<'7ÿ*6ÿ98ÿ96?ÿ37ÿ7ÿ'ÿ*6ÿ66ÿ 66ÿAÿ
7Bÿ766ÿÿ7'68ÿ;679ÿ;97'ÿ7ÿ6>>67Bÿ97ÿ6>>6676''?ÿ5889ÿ
'97ÿ97ÿ9'ÿ6ÿ'6ÿ>8ÿC877Dÿ9<'67'ÿÿ66ÿ986'?ÿ4*6ÿ>A7ÿ
'  66ÿ866797'ÿ986ÿ'99 6ÿ;889'?ÿ
,-.03$$Eÿ
I03$$JKKÿ
,-.03$$EFG#3H#$ÿ "-JKEJHÿ
ÿ ÿ
L#MÿNÿO-P-#ÿ ÿ
89ÿQ9 6'ÿ89ÿR;67ÿ)6;9667'ÿ ÿ!!!!!!ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ
S03J3$E0ÿTP3U$JÿNÿSK-0E3Jÿ ÿ
7ÿ+66;67ÿ5 ÿ37>89'886ÿ ÿ!!!!!ÿÿ
)ÿ)6976ÿ297ÿ%R'7ÿ ÿV!!!!!ÿÿ
9;98Wÿ%869ÿ297ÿ%R'7ÿ ÿ!!!!!ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ
SJTE#3J$JÿNÿ,-MEJ.EPEXÿ ÿ
Bÿ8A7>6'ÿ)666;67ÿ58<6'ÿYZ[\\]^_àÿcde`]fÿ_gÿhi^ij[jkÿ ÿV!!!!!!ÿÿ
BÿQ9 Bÿl6*6ÿ68>97ÿ997'ÿ ÿmV!!!!!ÿÿ
768Bÿ97ÿ&968ÿ>>67Bÿ97ÿ)676A9 6ÿ768Bÿn;896'ÿ ÿmV!!!!!ÿÿ
o69ÿ)6' 67Bÿ ÿpV!!!!!ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ
q3-MEJHrÿq-$Jÿ,#TE0MÿNÿq3$PMMJMMÿ ÿ
%R'77)6797ÿ>ÿ58;68Bÿ>8ÿ9*668ÿYsthÿujvìde_ig^wkÿ ÿ!!!!!ÿÿ
%>>89 6ÿo'7ÿ+66;67ÿ59;ÿQ7977ÿ ÿm!!!!!!!ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ
xEHy.3#y33KMÿNÿOEXÿ,#TE0Mÿ ÿ
BÿQ9 Bÿ%+%ÿ3;8667'ÿ ÿm!m!!!!!ÿÿ
Bÿ9686ÿ6768ÿ58;68Bÿ3;8667'ÿ ÿ!!!!!ÿÿ
+A7A7ÿBÿ58;68Bÿ3;8667'ÿ ÿ!!!!!ÿÿ
o'8ÿ586'6897ÿ5889'ÿ ÿ!!!!!!ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ

Page 91
01234ÿ6ÿ789281 ÿ ÿ
ÿÿÿÿ!ÿ"#ÿ$%ÿ ÿ&'())')))ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ
*288ÿ+21 4, 21 ÿ6ÿ-21 1.8ÿ ÿ
/0ÿ1ÿ2"ÿ!3#ÿ4ÿ25)()ÿ!3#ÿ67"#7ÿ ÿ5)'&8)')))ÿÿ
97ÿ!%ÿ:""#7ÿ ÿ;(';()')))ÿÿ
:7ÿ<ÿ="#%7ÿ7ÿ ÿ&>';?5'())ÿÿ
@ÿAÿ67"#7ÿ ÿ5B'8&&'>8?ÿÿ
ÿ




Page 92
Page 93
ÿ
12345ÿ7ÿ89 392 ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿ!ÿ"!ÿ#$!ÿÿ
ÿ




Page 94
Attachment D




To: General Obligation Bond Committee Date: November 30, 2022


From: Amber Williamson
Budget and Research Director

Subject: RESIDENT 2023 GO BOND PROGRAM COMMENTS

The Budget and Research Department compiles community feedback on the General
Obligation Bond Program to provide to the GO Bond Committees and City Leadership.
Attachment A-1 transmits a summary of all community feedback received from July 1
to Nov. 30, 2022.

Budget and Research staff maintains an e-mail address and a voice mailbox for
residents to provide comments on the GO Bond Program. Attachment B-1 transmits a
summary of these comments from Nov. 8 to Nov. 30, 2022, as well as social media
statistics.

Attachment C-1 transmits submissions to the 2023 GOPHX tool, from July 1 to Nov.
30, 2022. There were no Spanish submissions.

In total, 1,047 comments have been received since July 1, 2022.

At www.phoenix.gov/bond, residents can access the 2023 GO Bond Committee Reports
and other GO Bond Program information.

Residents can view the following:

- The 2023 GO Bond Informational Guide in English and Spanish
- Information on how to provide feedback
- Videos of completed GO Bond Committee Meetings




Page 95
ATTACHMENT A-1


SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY FEEDBACK
PROPOSED 2023 GENERAL OBLIGATION (GO) BOND PROGRAM
JULY 1, 2022 – NOVEMBER 30, 2022

Below is a summary of the comments received directly by the Budget and Research
Department by phone and email, captured in minutes from GO Bond Committee
meetings held through November 14, 2022, and through the GOPHX tool.

Comments for funding/support of GO Bond projects:
 (120) in support of funding for new parks or park improvements, including (66) for
the Estrella Village Civic Space, (26) for the Margaret T Hance Park Improvement
Project, (10) for a recreation center at Esteban Park, and (6) for additional lighting at
Pierce Park
 (80) funding for street maintenance and roadway safety improvements, including
(24) for Vision Zero Implementation, (21) for Equity Based Transportation Mobility,
(8) for traffic mitigation measures in the Roosevelt Historic District, (6) in support of
prioritized funding for speed mitigation infrastructure in Sunnyslope near Cave Creek
Road, and (2) for more sidewalks
 (75) to fund improvements to the Laveen Area Conveyance Channel
 (72) for funding new or renovated police stations, including (6) for the Cactus Park
Precinct and (3) for the Maryvale Precinct
 (67) for funding new or renovated fire stations, including (25) for Fire Station 74 and
(6) for a fire station in the Sunnyslope area
 (47) in support of funding for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements for
Phoenix Theatre
 (41) to fund improvement and expansion of the Arizona Science Center
 (39) additional funding for heat resiliency and mitigation projects, including (17)
requesting more shade structures and shade trees and (2) requesting additional
funding to install water stations at bus stops
 (35) in support of funding for new and renovated libraries, including (13) for the new
library at Desert View Civic Space on Deer Valley Road, (6) for a new library in
Sunnyslope, and (3) for the new library at Estrella Civic Space
 (32) additional funding to shelter individuals experiencing homelessness, permanent
and supportive housing, and supportive services
 (29) to fund Expansion of The Parsons Center for Health and Wellness
 (28) to fund repairs at Phoenix Center for the Arts
 (23) funding for historic preservation projects, with (1) for Heritage Square
Restoration, (1) for the Warehouse and Threatened Buildings Program, and (1) for
Orpheum Theatre Exterior Renovations
 (23) in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theatre Permanent Home Project
 (22) to fund the Arizona State University Health Science and Technology Center
 (21) additional funding for affordable housing projects, including (1) more affordable
housing options in the Garfield neighborhood
 (17) to provide funding to the Arizona Jewish Historical Society




Page 96
 (13) funding for equipment and vehicle replacement, including (8) for fire apparatus
and emergency vehicles
 (13) to fund the Children’s Museum of Phoenix Expansion
 (12) funding for storm drainage and flood control projects, including (2) supporting
the implementation of bioswales and (1) for the Hohokam Drainage Program
 (11) additional funding for public transportation and bus stops, including (3) for more
transit in the West and Southwest areas of the City
 (10) to fund Herberger Theater Center Theatrical Improvements
 (10) funding for Cultural Facilities Critical Equipment Replacements
 (7) additional funding for improvements to the Sunnyslope Community Center
 (7) funding for repairs at Santa Fe Springs Apartments
 (7) additional funding to support first responders and overall public safety
 (7) in support of the GO Bond Program
 (6) funding for City pools, splash pads, and aquatic centers
 (6) funding for Rio Reimagined Land Acquisition
 (5) additional funding for greening efforts on lower Grand Avenue
 (5) in support of electric vehicle charging infrastructure
 (5) additional funding for solar panel installation, with (2) specifically requesting them
at non-profit facilities and low-income residences
 (5) for new or renovated Pickleball courts at City parks
 (5) in support of funding all prioritized and future Arts & Culture capital needs
 (5) funding for a new facility for the Garment League
 (4) to fund science and technology initiatives, including (1) for funding to support the
partnership between the Biomedical Research Institute of Arizona (BRIA) and
Pathfinder
 (4) additional funding for the Community Assistance Program and mental health
response to calls for service
 (4) funding for the South Phoenix Youth Center
 (4) funding for Environment and Sustainability projects
 (4) in support of Symphony Hall Theatrical Venue Improvements
 (3) in support of funding for deferred maintenance of city facilities
 (3) funding to build new skate parks
 (3) funding for water conservation and reclamation efforts
 (3) funding for bike-friendly initiatives and bikeway renovations
 (3) funding to improve connectivity along the Rio Salado between South Phoenix
and Downtown, including renovation of the Central Avenue Bridge
 (3) in support of the Latino Cultural Center
 (2) funding for improvements to the South Mountain Park Roadway
 (2) funding for irrigation at Old Cross Cut Canal Park
 (2) funding for educational services

 (2) funding for Pueblo Grande Museum and Archaeologic Park Improvements
 (2) to fund the McDowell Senior Center Renovation
 (2) for ADA improvements to City facilities




Page 97
 (2) in support of funding for Cesar Chavez Senior Center
 (2) funding for new and renovated tennis courts
 (2) funding to build a Cold War Monument at Steele Indian School Park
 (1) funding for an Asian Cultural Center
 (1) funding for animal control facility improvements
 (1) funding for indoor play spaces
 (1) funding to pave the wash located north of John Jacobs Elementary School
 (1) funding for a Resilient Energy Hub
 (1) funding for improvements to recycling facilities
 (1) funding for the 27th Avenue Resource Innovation Center
 (1) funding to expand the Tres Rios Wetlands
 (1) funding for improvements to the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant
 (1) funding for a community center in the Metrocenter area
 (1) for Rio Salado Embankment Erosion Control
 (1) funding for Edison Eastlake development gap funding
 (1) funding for City Services Property Improvements
 (1) funding for citywide brownfields redevelopment projects
 (1) future funding for the University of Arizona Center for Advanced Molecular and
Immunological Therapies (CAMI)
 (1) funding for the Spark Area Land Acquisition
 (1) funding to renovate the Historic Steele Indian School Dining Hall
 (1) in support of Equipment Replacement for Energy Savings
 (1) funding to improve parking for hiking trails at the Reach 11 Recreation Area

Comments for reduced funding/opposition of GO Bond Projects:
 (26) opposed funding of police facilities and equipment, including (6) against police
stations, (5) opposed to the Police Driver Training Track, (2) opposed to the Police
Property Management Warehouse Renovation, and (2) against funding for vehicles
 (9) opposed funding for the Fuel and Oil Tank Replacement Project and projects
using fossil fuels
 (7) opposed funding for Parks & Recreation, including (1) opposed to funding for
more pools, (1) against funding golf courses, (1) against funding for South Mountain
Park Roadway, and (1) opposed to funding for the Margaret T Hance Park
Improvement Project
 (2) opposed to current Latino Cultural Center project plan
 (1) opposed funding for Orpheum Theatre and Tovrea Castle preservation projects
 (1) requesting reduced funding for Rio Reimagined
 (1) opposed funding for private residential historic preservation projects
 (1) opposed funding for Neighborhood Traffic Mitigation
 (1) opposed funding for Choice Neighborhoods Housing Development Gap Funding
 (1) opposed funding for the Yucca Branch Library Expansion
 (1) opposed funding for planting trees that cannot be maintained
 (1) opposed funding for City Service Center Property Improvements
 (1) opposed funding for the Pavement Maintenance Supplement




Page 98
 (1) opposed funding for more pickleball facilities
 (1) opposed the proposed GO Bond subcommittee recommendations

General comments about the GO Bond:
 (1) stated the prioritization process was confusing
 (1) expressed concern with the proposed GO Bond amount of $500 million
 (1) stated future capital needs and prioritized needs should be switched
 (1) requested increased GO Bond Program outreach
 (1) recommended a 50-year retrospective map be created showing ethnic
distribution, if a map of project distribution by district were to be produced




Page 99
ATTACHMENT B-1


VOICEMAIL, ELECTRONIC, AND WRITTEN GO BOND PROGRAM COMMENTS
NOVEMBER 8, 2022 – NOVEMBER 21, 2022, AND SOCIAL MEDIA STATISTICS

Emails

1. Alexandra Papazian sent an email in support of $100,000 in critical repairs funding for Ballet
Arizona.
2. Michael Panvini sent an email in support of restoring funding for the Cultural Facilities
Critical Equipment Replacement project to address HVAC repair and replacement needs for
Ballet Arizona.
3. Rabbi Jeffrey Schesnol sent an email in support of the city funding of $2 million for the
update, expansion, and addition of a Holocaust Education Center of the Cutler-Plotkin
Jewish Hertiage Center project.
4. Renee Neier sent an email in support of funding for the Holocaust Education Center.
5. Jason Adams sent an email opposed to funding being moved away from local urbanist
infrastructure efforts and failure to move away from car dependency has been a fiscal,
social, environmental, and housing disaster in Phoenix.
6. Steve Oberhansly sent an email in support of fully funding the Arts & Culture Cultural
Facilities Critical Equipment Replacement project to help meet the needs of deferred
maintenance across all Arts & Culture facilities.
7. Mara de Luca Funke sent an email opposed to the Parson’s Center for Health and Wellness
being eliminated from the Executive Committee’s recommended General Obligation (GO)
Bond scope.
8. Nicole Lovell sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
9. Lynn Flanagan sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
10. Ronda Nichols sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
11. Ashley Wester sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
12. Alison Pitt sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
13. Alba Chester sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
14. Katie Casey sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.




Page 100
15. Lisa McNamara sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
16. Jeanette Budd sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
17. Brenda Johnson sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
18. Keira Nichols sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
19. Tyler Service sent an email in support of funding for the Valley Youth Theater to have a
permanent location.
20. David Gironda sent an email in support of full funding for the permanent location for the
Valley Youth Theater.
21. Caroline Lobo sent an email requesting the Executive Committee increase the Environment
and Sustainability budget allocation from 5 to 8.2% to align with the recommendation of the
GO Bond Environment and Sustainability Subcommittee.
22. Joan L. Kelchner sent an email in support of support of bond money for Hance Park
renovations.
23. Marley Watkins sent an email in support of funding for Fire Station 74 in west Ahwatukee.
24. Ross Renner sent an email in support of funding for Fire Station 74 in west Ahwatukee.
25. Neil Giuliano, President & CEO of Greater Phoenix Leadership, Inc. sent a letter in support
of the projects being proposed for the 2023 GO Bond program. The letter is attached.
Voicemail
There were no voicemail comments.

Social media statistics from July 1 to Nov. 30, 2022
20 City of Phoenix Facebook Posts
 73,535 Views
 113 Likes
 14 Share
 18 Comments

140 City of Phoenix Tweets (across two City accounts)
 69,006 Views
 324 Likes
 130 Retweets
 32 Comments

38 City of Phoenix YouTube Videos (includes 34 meetings streamed on YouTube)
 45,080 Views




Page 101
Respectfully submitted,


Kari Lambert
Administrative Assistant I




Page 102
General Obligation Bond Executive Committee
200 W. Jefferson St.
Phoenix, Arizona 85003

November 14, 2022

Dear Members of General Obligation Bond Executive Committee,

It is my pleasure to write this letter in support of the projects being proposed for the City of Phoenix’s
2023 General Obligation (GO) Bond program.

Throughout this process, the city has solicited stakeholder feedback to promote health and wellness,
improve transportation and housing, and create a strong economic impact. These are essential to
building more resilient communities. Strong support from the public, private, and philanthropic sectors
is needed for these projects.

The projects that have been prioritized for the GO Bond will help fund critical infrastructure and
rehabilitation needs of city facilities and strengthen the revitalization our community. In doing so, the
city intends to make significant investments in art, affordable housing, public safety, environmental
remediation, city services, and further the reimaging Rio Salado corridor. This will help attract economic
development and expand prosperity throughout the region.

Greater Phoenix Leadership supports your efforts and looks forward to working with the City of Phoenix
as it makes headway toward conducting a city-wide vote in 2023. The proposed projects that you are
considering align with our mission to improve the economic vitality and quality of life throughout the
region.

Sincerely,



Neil Giuliano
President & CEO,
Greater Phoenix Leadership, Inc.




400 E. Van Buren Street, Suite 555 | Phoenix, Arizona 85004 | Office 602-252-5667 | www.gplinc.org

Page 103
ATTACHMENT C-1




Launched on July 1, 2022, the GOPHX Tool was designed to engage the public in the
development of the $500 million General Obligation (GO) Bond Program proposed by the City of
Phoenix. This interactive tool was available in both English and Spanish, and gave residents an
opportunity to provide feedback on prioritized projects recommended through the City's Capital
Needs Study, as well as to share community priorities and ideas for capital projects that could be
included in the GO Bond Program.

Between July 1 and Nov. 30, there were 177 submissions and 3,357 interactive page views.
Throughout the period of GO Bond Committee meetings, which concluded Nov. 14, Budget and
Research staff provided reports summarizing the data collected through the GOPHX tool.
Reports are broken out by Council district and include the following information:
• Number of submissions received;
• Demographic information;
• Average submission per district or the percentage of "yes" or "no" submissions; and,
• All comments received.

Budget and Research staff respond to comments received via the GOPHX tool, as appropriate.
Reports are published on the City of Phoenix GO Bond website at phoenix.gov/bond.




GOPHX Tool Overview............................................1 Arts & Culture....................................................21

Citywide...................................................................2 Economic Development & Education................28

District 1..................................................................5 Environment & Sustainability............................31

District 2..................................................................7 Housing, Human Services & Homelessness.......36

District 3..................................................................9 Neighborhoods & City Services..........................42

District 4................................................................11 Parks & Recreation.............................................55

District 5................................................................13 Public Safety.......................................................70

District 6................................................................15 Streets & Storm Drainage..................................80

District 7................................................................17 Share Your GO Bond Ideas.................................89

District 8................................................................19



Page 104
Citywide – as of November 30, 2022

Submissions by Age Range
7 4






18-29 30-49 50-69 70+ No Answer

Submissions by Gender




4 1

Female Male No Answer Other

Page 105
Citywide – as of November 30, 2022

Site Views


English
Spanish



Time Spent on Site (Minutes)

Spanish 5.23


English 16.31

0 5 10 15 20




Page 106
Citywide – as of November 30, 2022

Categories Changed
Economic Development & Education

Arts & Culture

Environment & Sustainability

Neighborhoods & City Services

Public Safety

Streets & Storm Drainage

Parks & Recreation

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Categories Opened
Parks & Recreation
Streets & Storm Drainage
Neighborhoods & City Services
Housing, Human Services & Homelessness
Public Safety
Environment & Sustainability
Arts & Culture
Economic Development & Education
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Reflects all site activity which may or may not have resulted in an actual submittal, including repeat
submissions.


Page 107
District 1 – as of November 30, 2022

Submissions by Age Range
1 1






18-29 30-49 50-69 70+ No Answer

Submissions by Gender







Female Male No Answer



Page 108
District 1 – as of November 30, 2022
Resident Responses
The percent of District 1 residents indicating “yes" or “no” for
all categories

Arts and Culture 36%

Economic Development & Education 50%

Environment & Sustainability 76%

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness 63%

Neighborhoods & City Services 39%

Parks & Recreation 36%

Public Safety 64%

Streets & Storm Drainage 40%


Yes No

number of submissions (N) = 24




Page 109
District 2 – as of November 30, 2022

Submissions by Age Range










18-29 30-49 50-69


Submissions by Gender








Female Male



Page 110
District 2 – as of November 30, 2022
Resident Responses
The percent of District 2 residents indicating “yes" or “no” for
all categories

Arts and Culture 35%

Economic Development & Education 36%

Environment & Sustainability 55%

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness 59%

Neighborhoods & City Services 33%

Parks & Recreation 34%

Public Safety 57%

Streets & Storm Drainage 42%


Yes No

number of submissions (N) = 11




Page 111
District 3 – as of November 30, 2022

Submissions by Age Range
1 2








18-29 30-49 50-69 70+ No Answer


Submissions by Gender






Female Male No Answer


Page 112
District 3 – as of November 30, 2022
Resident Responses
The percent of District 3 residents indicating “yes" or “no” for
all categories

Arts and Culture 43%

Economic Development & Education 47%

Environment & Sustainability 80%

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness 60%

Neighborhoods & City Services 48%

Parks & Recreation 67%

Public Safety 58%

Streets & Storm Drainage 54%


Yes No


number of submissions (N) = 16




Page 113
District 4 – as of November 30, 2022

Submissions by Age Range






18-29 30-49 50-69 No Answer


Submissions by Gender






1 1

Female Male No Answer Other



Page 114
District 4 – as of November 30, 2022
Resident Responses
The percent of District 4 residents indicating “yes" or “no” for
all categories

Arts and Culture 57%

Economic Development & Education 60%

Environment & Sustainability 57%

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness 68%

Neighborhoods & City Services 49%

Parks & Recreation 51%

Public Safety 33%

Streets & Storm Drainage 60%


Yes No
number of submissions (N) = 25




Page 115
District 5 – as of November 30, 2022

Submissions by Age Range
1 2









18-29 30-49 50-69 70+


Submissions by Gender





Female Male



Page 116
District 5 – as of November 30, 2022
Resident Responses
The percent of District 5 residents indicating “yes" or “no” for
all categories

Arts and Culture 34%

Economic Development & Education 25%

Environment & Sustainability 46%

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness 30%

Neighborhoods & City Services 30%

Parks & Recreation 32%

Public Safety 29%

Streets & Storm Drainage 39%


Yes No
number of submissions (N) = 16




Page 117
District 6 – as of November 30, 2022

Submissions by Age Range
2 5









18-29 30-49 50-69 70+


Submissions by Gender






Female Male

Page 118
District 6 – as of November 30, 2022
Resident Responses
The percent of District 6 residents indicating “yes" or “no” for
all categories

Arts and Culture 41%

Economic Development & Education 32%

Environment & Sustainability 52%

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness 57%

Neighborhoods & City Services 41%

Parks & Recreation 44%

Public Safety 47%

Streets & Storm Drainage 44%


Yes No

number of submissions (N) = 44




Page 119
District 7 – as of November 30, 2022

Submissions by Age Range





18-29 30-49 50-69



Submissions by Gender








Female Male


Page 120
District 7 – as of November 30, 2022
Resident Responses
The percent of District 7 residents indicating “yes" or “no” for
all categories

Arts and Culture 68%

Economic Development & Education 71%

Environment & Sustainability 83%

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness 82%

Neighborhoods & City Services 70%

Parks & Recreation 63%

Public Safety 51%

Streets & Storm Drainage 65%


Yes No

number of submissions (N) = 24




Page 121
District 8 – as of November 30, 2022

Submissions by Age Range






18-29 30-49 50-69 70+ No Answer


Submissions by Gender







Female Male No Answer


Page 122
District 8 – as of November 30, 2022
Resident Responses
The percent of District 8 residents indicating “yes" or “no” for
all categories

Arts and Culture 46%

Economic Development & Education 53%

Environment & Sustainability 65%

Housing, Human Services & Homelessness 59%

Neighborhoods & City Services 48%

Parks & Recreation 45%

Public Safety 41%

Streets & Storm Drainage 50%


Yes No

number of submissions (N) = 17




Page 123
Arts & Culture
The percent of residents indicating “yes” or “no” for the Arts & Culture category,
by district
100%
90%
80%
70%
Page 124 60%
50%
40%
68%
30% 57%
20% 46% 43% 41% 46%
36% 35% 34%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
Yes No
number of submissions (N) = 177
Arts & Culture

Children's Museum of Phoenix Expansion: $1.6 million


Add 17,000 square feet in usable space by completing previously
unfinished spaces in the museum. Improvements include: structural,
HVAC, plumbing, electrical, life/safety, accessibility, lighting, room
finishes, technology infrastructure, and hazard abatement.
(215 N. 7th Street)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
71%
30% 64%
52% 50% 47% 50% 50% 47%
20%
27%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 125
Arts & Culture

Cultural Facilities Critical Equipment Replacements: $10 million


Extend the functional life of City-owned cultural facilities by replacing
critical equipment and plumbing/mechanical systems, performing
maintenance on necessary structural elements (e.g. parking lots and
roofing), and completing cosmetic updates where needed.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 83%
30% 64%
53% 50% 53%
20% 46% 44%
36% 33%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 126
Arts & Culture

Latino Cultural Center: $21.7 million

Design and construct a world-class Latino Cultural Center in accordance
with the Latino Center Ad Hoc Committee recommendations that were
approved by City Council in September 2020. The funding level
anticipates that a 22,000 square foot center would be located at the
North Building at Hance Park.
(1202 N. 3rd Street - North Building at Hance Park)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
71%
30%
45% 52%
20% 40% 36% 41%
33%
10% 25%
13%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 127
Arts & Culture

Symphony Hall Theatrical Venue Improvements: $8.7 million


Improve the acoustical and audiovisual experience for both patrons
and performers at Symphony Hall in downtown Phoenix.
(75 N. 2nd Street)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 40% 40% 46% 41%
35% 33% 30%
27%
10% 19%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 128
Arts & Culture

Valley Youth Theatre - Permanent Home Project: $14.1 million

Secure land, design and construct a new Valley Youth Center for the
Arts to provide a permanent home for the Valley Youth Theatre. The
Center includes a 300-seat feature theatre plus a 99-seat studio
theatre for smaller productions. Also included are office and meeting
space, rehearsal/workshop space, dance studios, galleries and space
for set, costumes, prop shops and storage.
(525 N. 1st Street)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
71%
30% 60% 64%
49% 47%
20% 42% 36% 39%
31%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 129
Arts & Culture

Comments:
1. Jennifer Dangremond (District 6) stated improvements and maintenance
of facilities that are city-owned made perfect sense and supported funding
for Cultural Facilities Critical Equipment Replacements. Ms. Dangremond
emphasized the importance of having a Latino Cultural Center in Phoenix
and Arizona but had questions about how annual operating costs would be
funded, how much funding from the private sector would be raised for
construction, and who would operate the facility; she stated she could not
support GO Bond funding for this project as there were too many
questions. (Aug. 30 Report)
2. Nicholas Salazar (District 7) stated money should be invested towards
meaningful impact and change within the Latino community before
spending $21.7 million on a building meant to represent it. (Sept. 26
Report)




Page 130
Economic Development & Education
The percent of residents indicating “yes” or “no” for the Economic Development &
Education category, by district
100%
90%
80%
70%
Page 131
60%
50%
40%
71%
30% 60%
47% 50% 47% 53%
20% 36%
25% 32%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
Yes No


number of submissions (N) = 177
Economic Development & Education

Rio Reimagined Land Acquisition: $23.5 million


Acquire land and perform predevelopment activities that may include
environmental assessments and cleanup necessary to prepare
economically attractive sites along the Rio Salado for development.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
71%
30% 60%
47% 50% 47% 53%
20% 36% 32%
10% 25%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 132
Economic Development & Education

Comments:
1. Dave Eichelman (District 3) opposed funding Rio Reimagined Land
Acquisition and stated the cost should be offset by future developers. Mr.
Eichelman mentioned he did not want his tax money profiting businesses.
(July 2022)
2. J. Coughlin (District 1) expressed support for funding to acquire land for
Rio Reimagined, but not to get it ready for development. Ms. Coughlin
stressed the importance of infill and redeveloping under-utilized land
rather than new land. (Aug. 12 Report)
3. Irwin Sheinbein (District 6) requested the remaining funding from his
submission be proportionally divided among the areas where he expressed
support. (Sept. 9 Report)
4. Nicholas Salazar (District 7) supported funding the Rio Reimagined Land
Acquisition to benefit the state and invest in the environment. He
proposed increasing the project cost to $40 to 80 million to speed up the
process. (Sept. 26 Report)




Page 133
Environment & Sustainability
The percent of residents indicating “yes” or “no” for the Environment &
Sustainability category, by district
100%
90%
80%
70%
Page 134 60%
50%
40% 76% 80% 83%
30% 63% 57% 65%
55% 52%
20% 46%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
Yes No

number of submissions (N) = 177
Environment & Sustainability

Equipment Replacements for Energy and Water Savings: $5 million

Replace and upgrade aging equipment and fixtures using new energy-or water
efficient technologies that will reduce energy and/or water use and
greenhouse gas emissions associated with existing City facilities.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
92%
40% 80% 84%
69% 75% 71%
30% 55% 55%
20% 44%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No
N = 177




Page 135
Environment & Sustainability

Fuel and Oil Tank Replacement: $5.1 million


Replace aging fuel infrastructure that has exceeded the original
estimated service life of 30 years.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 79% 80% 79%
30% 64% 59%
56% 50%
20% 41%
10% 24%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 136
Environment & Sustainability

Upgrade HVAC and other Climate Control Equipment for Energy
Savings: $15 million

Install energy efficient HVAC equipment or other climate control
systems to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions
from City facilities. Facility Condition Assessments identified the need
to replace aging and inefficient HVAC systems at many facilities
including City-operated community and recreation centers, arts and
cultural facilities, and administrative buildings.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 75% 80% 79%
30% 65% 64% 59% 65%
20% 45% 44%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177


Page 137
Environment & Sustainability

Comments:
1. Nicholas Salazar (District 7) proposed a substantial increase to funding for
Equipment Replacements for Energy and Water Savings, Fuel and Oil Tank
Replacement, and the project to Upgrade HVAC and other Climate Control
Equipment for Energy Savings. (Sept. 26 Report)
2. Patrick Seifter (District 4) opposed funding for the Fuel and Oil Tank
Replacement project, stating it would be for police vehicles. He
recommended getting rid of the vehicles instead of replacing the tanks.
(Oct. 7 Report)
3. Katarina Lujic (District 7) stated $25 million as the maximum investment
for sustainability was extremely low given Phoenix’s location and water
concerns. She stated she would be happier to see the amount increased
threefold. (Oct. 7 Report)
4. Andrea Golfen (District 4) opposed GO Bond funding for the Fuel and Oil
Tank Replacement, stating existing Police funds should be used to upgrade
Police equipment and funding should be allocated away from Police to
community services. (Oct. 7 Report)




Page 138
Housing, Human Services & Homelessness
The percent of residents indicating “yes” or “no” for the Housing, Human
Services & Homelessness category, by district
100%
90%
80%
70%
Page 139 60%
50%
40% 82%
30% 61% 63% 68%
59% 60% 57% 59%
20%
30%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
Yes No

number of submissions (N) = 177
Housing, Human Services & Homelessness

Affordable Housing Property Preservation - Phase 1: $33 million


Renovate and preserve up to 610 affordable housing units at four
properties where physical condition assessments have been
completed and identified critical needs. Renovations include
structural repairs, electrical and mechanical improvements, HVAC
replacements, and other updates. Complete Facility Condition
Assessments at 16 additional Housing Department properties.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 84% 88%
68% 67% 73% 67%
30% 61% 65%
20% 38%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 140
Housing, Human Services & Homelessness

Cesar Chavez Senior Center: $5.7 million


Design and construct a new 12,600 square foot multi-purpose senior
center adjacent to the Cesar Chavez Community Center.
(Cesar Chavez Regional Park)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 60% 63% 59%
51% 54% 52% 52%
20% 45%
10%
13%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No


N = 177




Page 141
Housing, Human Services & Homelessness

Choice Neighborhoods Housing Development Gap Funding: $21.2 million


Cover the increased cost for construction, materials, and labor necessary
to complete the final phase (Phase IV) of the Edison-Eastlake
redevelopment project. Phase IV consists of 364 new, modern, mixed-
income rental housing units (286 affordable and 78 market rate).
(Edison-Eastlake Community)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
92%
40% 76%
30% 64% 63% 64% 60% 57% 53%
20% 38%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 142
Housing, Human Services & Homelessness

McDowell Senior Center Renovation: $1.8 million


Renovate the historic McDowell Senior Center. Modernize HVAC
equipment, update the electric system, replace existing plumbing,
update the fire suppression system, and restore the building
envelope, interior office and meeting spaces.
(1845 E. McDowell Road)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
88%
40%
30% 61% 67% 60%
55% 53% 59% 59%
20%
31%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 143
Housing, Human Services & Homelessness

Comments:
1. Marshall Zeable (District 1) opposed Choice Neighborhoods Housing
Development Gap Funding, stating that those who do not work for a living
should not get free housing. (Aug. 12 Report)
2. Caiti C (District 1) expressed support for funding for Affordable Housing
Property Preservation - Phase 1 and Choice Neighborhoods Housing
Development Gap Funding, advocating for more affordable housing
because rent has increased and resulted in more homelessness in the city
than ever before. (Oct. 7 Report)
3. Katarina Lujic (District 7) stated Affordable Housing Property Preservation -
Phase 1 was overdue because the homeless population in the city has
grown and the City needs to support them. Ms. Lujic advocated for the
Choice Neighborhoods Housing Development Gap Funding to be
affordable or for the homeless population given the increased irregularity
in climate and water sources that put homeless people in danger. (Oct. 7
Report)




Page 144
Neighborhoods & City Services
The percent of residents indicating “yes” or “no” for the Neighborhoods & City
Services category, by district
100%
90%
80%
70%
Page 145 60%
50%
40%
70%
30%
46% 48% 49% 48%
20% 39% 41%
33% 30%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
Yes No

number of submissions (N) = 177
Neighborhoods & City Services

Branch Library at Desert View Civic Space: $4 million


Design and construct a new 13,000 square foot branch library as part
of Phase 1 of the Desert View Civic Space. Phase 1 consists of the civic
space master plan, design of a regional park, construction of park
amenities, and a branch library. At final completion the Desert View
Village Civic Space is expected to include a 40 acre regional park, and
a community center.
(Deer Valley Drive & Tatum Boulevard)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 54%
20% 47% 40% 41%
39% 36% 36%
29% 25%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 146
Neighborhoods & City Services

Branch Library at Estrella Civic Space: $6.2 million


Design and construct a new 20,000 square foot branch library as part
of Phase 1 of the Estrella Village Civic Space. Phase 1 consists of the
civic space master plan, design of a regional park, construction of park
amenities, and a branch library. At final completion the Estrella Village
Civic Space is expected to include a 93 acre regional park, a
community center, and an aquatic center.
(99th Avenue & Lower Buckeye Road)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 67%
53% 56%
20% 44% 47%
36% 36%
29% 25%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 147
Neighborhoods & City Services

City Facility ADA Improvements: $10.1 million


Ensure ongoing compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) at City facilities. Complete prioritized improvements to signage,
restrooms, parking lots, ramps, doors and other barriers to maximize
access.
(Public Works Properties - All)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 83%
30% 64%
47% 47% 53%
20% 41%
29% 25%
10% 18%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 148
Neighborhoods & City Services

City Service Center Property Improvements: $10.1 million


Repair or replace mechanical and building systems such as roofs,
asphalt, plumbing, electrical, and security systems at Public Works
Service Centers that support the activity of City departments.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 83%
30% 54%
52% 53% 52% 53%
20% 44% 41%
36%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 149
Neighborhoods & City Services

Downtown City Property Improvements: $10.1 million


Address major equipment and building deficiencies at facilities in the
Downtown Phoenix Government Campus: Phoenix City Hall, Calvin C.
Goode Municipal Building, Phoenix Municipal Court, and the 305 and
Adams Street Garages. Facility Condition Assessments completed in
2021 identified the need to repair/replace HVAC, plumbing, elevator,
electrical, and security systems.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 63% 60% 67%
51% 53%
20% 45% 44% 43%
38%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 150
Neighborhoods & City Services

Heritage Square Facilities Restoration: $653,737


Buildings and exterior repairs and restorations include: (1) Silva
House: floor repairs, roof replacement, and HVAC; (2) Teeter House:
electrical panel upgrade, and floor repairs; (3) Pizzeria Bianco and Bar
Bianco: electrical panel upgrade, and floor repairs; and (4) replace
clay pipe plumbing, and perform foundation and brick/mortar repairs.
(115 N. 6th Street)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 75%
30%
48% 47% 50% 53%
20% 45%
33% 36% 38%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 151
Neighborhoods & City Services

Historic Preservation Demonstration Project Grants: $1.3 million


Encourage rehabilitation and reuse of historic commercial,
multi-family and institutional buildings. Provide funding assistance for
projects that best demonstrate City historic preservation goals and
objectives, paying up to 50 percent of eligible rehabilitation costs for
buildings listed individually on the City’s historic register or as
contributing properties in a City historic district.
(Multiple)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 63%
48% 53%
20% 45% 42% 40% 43%
36%
10% 25%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 152
Neighborhoods & City Services

Historic Preservation Exterior Rehabilitation Grant Program: $1.1 million


Provide matching grants to complete critical structural and exterior
restoration work on historic dwellings with a minimum matching amount
of $5,000 to a maximum of $20,000.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 67%
53%
20% 44% 40% 44% 41%
33% 36% 31%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 153
Neighborhoods & City Services

Historic Preservation Warehouse & Threatened Buildings Program:
$1.8 million


Protect historic downtown warehouses and other threatened historic
buildings. Assist property owners with exterior rehabilitation work or
to acquire/assist with acquisitions of threatened historic properties.
For rehabilitation projects, the program can pay up to 100 percent of
eligible project costs provided that the owner expends an equal or
greater amount of ineligible work items.
(Multiple)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 67%
43% 48% 43% 47%
20% 38% 36% 40%
10%
13%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177


Page 154
Neighborhoods & City Services

Orpheum Theatre Exterior Rehabilitation: $1.6 million


Restore and preserve the exterior architectural features of the historic
Orpheum Theatre and upgrade the exterior accent lighting.
(203 W. Adams Street)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 75%
30% 60%
20% 45% 46% 47%
39% 35%
10% 18% 25%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 155
Neighborhoods & City Services

Yucca Branch Library Expansion: $5.5 million


Add 10,000 square feet to Yucca Branch Library to improve visitor
experience by adding new amenities and reducing wait times. The
additional space will provide new meeting and study rooms, allow for
additional public computers, and accommodate an Automated
Materials Handling System.
(5648 N. 15th Avenue)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 75%
30% 60%
20% 45% 48% 41%
33% 38% 39%
10% 18%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 156
Neighborhoods & City Services

Comments:
1. Dave Eichelman (District 3) stated he was conflicted about using GO Bond
funding towards private historical restoration projects through the Historic
Preservation Exterior Rehabilitation Grant Program. He explained the
funds have historically been distributed to those who already have
resources to complete the projects on their own. (July 2022)
2. Marshall Zeable (District 1) opposed the Yucca Branch Library Expansion,
stating there is no need for physical libraries now that everything is online.
(Aug. 12 Report)
3. Praveen Mahadevaiah (District 5) expressed support for the Branch Library
at Desert View Civic Space. He stated it would be a great addition to the
Desert Ridge community, as the nearest branch is approximately six miles
away. (Sept. 26 Report)
4. Patrick Seifter (District 4) did not support City Service Center Property
Improvements that would benefit the Police Department. (Oct. 7 Report)
5. Andrea Golfen (District 4) supported the Yucca Branch Expansion project
expressing that the neighborhood needs more public resources. (Oct. 7
Report)




Page 157
Parks & Recreation
The percent of residents indicating “yes” or “no” for the Parks & Recreation and
Library category, by district
100%

80%

Page 158 60%

40%
67% 63%
47% 51% 44% 45%
20% 36% 34% 32%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
Yes No


number of submissions (N) = 177
Parks & Recreation

Desert View Civic Space - Phase 1: $8.4 million

Design and construct Phase 1 of the Desert View Village Civic Space.
At completion the Desert View Village Civic Space is expected to
include a 40 acre regional park, a community center, a branch library,
and a park and ride. Phase 1 consists of the civic space master plan,
regional park design, construction of 1/2 of regional park amenities,
and a 13,000 square foot branch library.
(Deer Valley Drive & Tatum Boulevard)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
73%
30%
45% 48% 50%
20% 41% 40% 35%
10% 25%
17%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 159
Parks & Recreation

Estrella Civic Space - Phase 1: $12.3 million


Design and construct Phase 1 of the Estrella Village Civic Space. At
completion the Estrella Village Civic Space is expected to include a 93
acre regional park, a community center, an aquatic center, and a
branch library. Phase 1 consists of the civic space master plan,
regional park design, construction of 1/3 of regional park amenities,
and a 20,000 square foot branch library.
(91st Avenue & Lower Buckeye)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 67% 63%
45% 52% 48% 47%
20%
27% 31%
10% 21%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 160
Parks & Recreation

Harmon Park Regional Pool and Three Splash Pad Sites: $12.8 million


Repurpose four pools in south Phoenix to provide a regional pool at
Harmon Park, and 3 splash pads at Alkire, Grant, and University Parks.
The regional pool will feature a 25-meter lap pool with dive boards,
zero depth entry, water play area, swimming lesson area, water slide,
shade structures, pool heater, and playground. Construct an ADA
accessible bath house with a lifeguard room for training.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 64%
49% 53% 50% 47%
20% 42% 45% 46%
38%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 161
Parks & Recreation

Margaret T Hance Park Improvements: $17.8 million


Design and construct Central Bridge Plaza improvements to create
safer, more accessible entry points for park patrons. Build a hill
feature north of the garden to increase open green space. Develop a
defined tree grove to improve and support the City's Tree and Shade
Master Plan. Expand parking on the west end. Incorporate an
interactive water feature amenity.
(67 W. Culver Street)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 67%
46% 52% 50%
20% 43% 41%
27% 31% 34%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 162
Parks & Recreation

Maryvale Park Regional Pool and Two Splash Pad Sites: $14.4 million

Repurpose three deteriorating pools in the Maryvale area to provide a
first-rate regional pool at Maryvale Park and install two new splash
pads at Marivue Park and Holiday Park. The regional pool will feature
a 25-meter lap pool with dive boards, zero depth entry, interactive
water play area, swimming lesson area, water slide, shade structures,
pool heater, and water playground.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
68%
30% 60%
48% 48% 50%
20% 44%
38% 36% 35%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 163
Parks & Recreation

Mountain View Community Center Sports Complex Improvements:
$1.2 million


Renovate the exterior sports courts at the Mountain View Community
Center, including existing basketball and tennis courts and construct
16 (or more) pickleball courts.
(1104 E. Grovers Road)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 67% 63%
48% 50% 48%
20% 36% 40% 38% 35%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No
N = 177




Page 164
Parks & Recreation

Pueblo Grande Museum and Archaeologic Park Improvements: $6.8
million

Perform structural improvements to the Adobe Workshop. Update
museum galleries to preserve thousands of prehistoric artifacts. Ensure
exhibits convey the stories and perspectives of Tribal Nations. Improve
access and visitor experience. Upgrade the collection facilities to increase
storage capacity, efficiency, and staff safety. Design and construct access
improvements to the Park of Four Waters.
(4619 E. Washington Street)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 60% 67%
56%
20% 45% 42% 43%
25% 29%
10% 18%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 165
Parks & Recreation

Rio Salado Embankment Erosion Control: $4.6 million


Restore eroded embankments and reinforce 12 known compromised
areas with compacted clean fill and large boulder size rip rap.
(2439 S Central Avenue)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 75%
73%
30%
51% 46% 52%
20% 44% 43% 41%
36%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 166
Parks & Recreation

South Mountain Community Center Renovations: $5.6 million


Renovate the South Mountain Community Center. Needs include new
air conditioning units and air handlers, new flooring to address ADA
issues, gymnasium perimeter replacement, restroom renovations,
millwork (built-in counters, cabinets, etc.), lighting improvements, and
dance room remodel.
(212 E. Alta Vista Road)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
73% 71%
30% 65%
52% 56%
20% 42% 45% 43%
31%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 167
Parks & Recreation

South Mountain Roadway Safety Enhancements: $15.6 million


Design and construct safety improvements to the 15 miles of South
Mountain Park roadways. Repave and structurally solidify the roadway
where possible.
(10919 S. Central Avenue)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 67% 67%
20% 43% 44% 47%
31% 36%
10% 25% 27%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 168
Parks & Recreation

South Phoenix Youth Center Improvements: $3.2 million


Renovate the South Phoenix Youth Center. Needs include repair roof,
ADA improvements, flooring replacement to avoid trip hazards,
restroom renovations, stage renovation (lighting, floor, curtains,
audio), basketball and sand volleyball court repairs, ramada, natural
shade installation, irrigation replacement, lighting, and parking lot
repairs.
(5245 S. 7th Street)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 83%
73% 76%
68%
30% 60% 54% 50%
20% 36% 31%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 169
Parks & Recreation

Telephone Pioneers of America Park Recreation Center
Improvements: $2.7 million


Renovate the recreation center at Telephone Pioneers of America
Park. Reconfigure doors and entrances, improve flooring and update
restroom facilities to comply with ADA standards, replace fire
suppression and intrusion alarm systems, reconfigure landscaping to
eliminate roof access, replace deteriorating cabinets and
workstations, and upgrade interior and exterior lighting.
(1946 W. Morningside Drive)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 67%
54%
20% 35%
34% 32%
10% 25% 20% 19%
18%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177


Page 170
Parks & Recreation

Washington Activity Center Renovations: $3.6 million


Renovate the Washington Activity Center. Needs include replacing the
aging intrusion alarm system, repairing damaged classroom ceilings,
walls and built-in cabinets, restroom renovations, replacing aging
exterior security doors throughout the center and auditorium
building, and upgrading lighting.
(2240 W. Citrus Way)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 75%
30% 67%
47% 48% 53%
20% 45%
36% 31%
10% 21%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No


N = 177



Page 171
Parks & Recreation

Comments:
1. J. Coughlin (District 1) expressed support to fund the Harmon Park
Regional Pool and stated the pools would be more important than the
splash pads. Ms. Coughlin also supported funding for the Maryvale Park
Regional Pool and Two Splash Pad Sites, proposing a reduction to the
water playground and emphasizing the importance of swimming lessons
and shade structure. (Aug. 12 Report)
2. Jennifer Dangremond (District 6) expressed support for funding Pueblo
Grande Museum and Archaeologic Park Improvements but emphasized
the importance of hearing from tribes and tribal members on returning
artifacts and items remaining in storage at this location to tribes. (Aug. 30
Report)
3. Jonathan Franco (District 4) supported funding for South Mountain
Roadway Safety Enhancements and requested the installation of bike lanes
and sidewalks along the roadway, with a preference for parallel multi-use
pathways. (Aug. 30 Report)
4. Liz C (District 7) supported funding for Estrella Civic Space - Phase 1 and
requested pickleball courts be installed. (Sept. 9 Report)
5. Nicholas Salazar (District 7) opposed funding for the Harmon Park Regional
Pool and Three Splash Pad Sites because it would be a waste of much
needed water and money. Mr. Salazar proposed investments towards the
City’s Tree and Shade Master Plan throughout Phoenix and especially in
low-income neighborhoods, instead of funding Margaret T Hance Park
Improvements. He also opposed funding for repaving as part of the South
Mountain Roadway Safety Enhancements and proposed instead
constructing concrete roads for longer usage and savings. (Sept. 26 Report)



Page 172
Parks & Recreation

Comments:
6. Michael Tarek (District 6) expressed support to fund Phase 1 of the Desert
View and Estrella Civic Spaces, Harmon Park Regional Pool and Three
Splash Pad Sites, Margaret T. Hance Park Improvements, and South
Mountain Roadway Safety Enhancements, emphasizing the importance of
tree shade for all walkways to help mitigate the heat island effect. He
advocated for all paths to be 75% shaded and noted experience tree
trimmers should be hired as well. (Oct. 7 Report)




Page 173
Public Safety
The percent of residents indicating “yes” or “no” for the Public Safety category,
by district
100%
90%
80%
70%
Page 174
60%
50%
40%
30% 64% 57% 58%
47% 47% 51%
20% 41%
33% 29%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
Yes No

number of submissions (N) = 177
Public Safety

Cactus Park Precinct & Northern Command Center Relocation: $49.5 million


Relocate the Cactus Park Police Precinct and Northern Command Center.
Acquire 10 acres in a suitable location. Construct the following facilities:
13,225 square foot precinct with a community room, 12,136 square foot
Traffic Bureau structure, motorcycle garage, and vehicle shop with an
attached firearm training facility. Install solar covered parking. Demolish the
existing precinct facility.

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
50% 45%
20% 40% 34%
30% 25% 24%
10% 17%
12%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 175
Public Safety

Fire Station 13/Community Assistance Program: $21.7 million


Replace and upgrade Fire Station #13. Acquire three acres of land in
the vicinity of 44th Street and Thomas Road. Construct a new 18,000
square foot, 4-bay fire station to support additional emergency
response personnel and equipment. Acquire 2 new apparatus (1
pumper and 1 rescue vehicle). The existing fire station building will be
retained and utilized to support the Community Advocacy Program.
(44th Street and Thomas)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
71% 73% 67%
30% 61% 64% 59% 65%
52%
20% 44%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 176
Public Safety

Fire Station 15/Community Assistance Program: $21.4 million


Replace and upgrade Fire Station #15. Acquire 3 acres of land in the
vicinity of 45th Avenue and Camelback Road. Construct a new 18,000
square foot, 4-bay fire station to support additional emergency
response personnel and equipment. Acquire 2 new apparatus (1
pumper and 1 rescue vehicle). The existing fire station building will be
retained and utilized to support the Community Advocacy Program.
(43rd Avenue and Camelback)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 75%
67% 73%
30% 63% 64% 64% 65%
56%
20% 38%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 177
Public Safety

Fire Station 51: $18.5 million


Construct new Fire Station #51. Acquire three acres of land in the
vicinity of 51st Avenue and SR303. Construct a new 20,000 square
foot, five-bay fire station. Acquire five new fire apparatus (one ladder,
one ladder tender, one pumper, one hazardous material support
vehicle and one rescue vehicle), as well as one new battalion chief
vehicle. (51st Avenue and SR-303)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
71% 73% 67%
30% 59% 64% 58%
48% 53%
20% 38%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 178
Public Safety

Fire Station 7/Community Assistance Program: $21.4 million


Replace and upgrade Fire Station #7. Acquire three acres of land in the
vicinity of 4th Street and Hatcher Road. Construct a new 18,000 square
foot, four-bay fire station to support additional emergency response
personnel and equipment. Acquire two new apparatus (one pumper
and one rescue vehicle). The existing fire station building will be
retained and utilized to support the Community Advocacy Program.
(4th Street and Hatcher)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 82%
75%
30% 64% 67% 66% 67%
52% 50% 53%
20%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177



Page 179
Public Safety

Maryvale Police Precinct Renovations: $3 million


Renovate and update the Maryvale Police Precinct.
(6180 W. Encanto Boulevard)

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
71%
30% 64% 60% 54%
20% 43%
36% 35%
10% 25%
16%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 180
Public Safety

Police Driver Training - Track Expansion and Repair - Phase 1: $13.8 million


Construct an additional police driver training track, and repair the existing
track to new condition.
(8645 W. Broadway Road)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 42% 40%
24% 27% 25% 29%
10% 18%
12%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No


N = 177




Page 181
Public Safety

Police Property Management Warehouse Renovation: $9 million

Renovate the Police Property Management Warehouse and secure
the property for vehicle evidence currently stored at a different
location. Construct a 1,600 square foot administrative building for the
vehicle lot. Update and improve aging evidence preservation and
storage equipment and spaces to optimize space utilization and
provide a visitor lobby.
(100 E. Elwood Street)

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 63%
20% 36% 40% 42%
32% 30%
10% 16% 18%
13%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No



N = 177


Page 182
Public Safety

Comments:
1. Bob Carr (District 7) opposed funding the expansion and repair of the
Police Driver Training Track and proposed using readily available public
spaces, such as the Phoenix International Raceway or South Mountain Park
for training. (July 2022)
2. Dave Eichelman (District 3) opposed funding renovations of the Maryvale
Police Precinct, explaining he would like to see concrete Police reforms
before funding the department’s projects. (July 2022)
3. Jennifer Purdon (District 5) stated she would support funding the Cactus
Park Precinct & Northern Command Center Relocation at a lower cost.
(July 2022)
4. Marshall Zeable (District 1) supported funding for Fire Station
7/Community Assistance Program and proposed utilizing city park
property for new fire stations to address growth and improve fire station
coverage. (Aug. 12 Report)
5. Paul Dean (District 6) stated the bond should include all eight original fire
stations proposed by the department to address a serious infrastructure
shortage that is putting residents at risk with extended response times.
(Aug. 30 Report)
6. Irwin Sheinbein (District 6) stated he was in favor of allocating as much
money as possible for Public Safety, especially the Fire and Police
Departments. (Sept. 9 Report)
7. Nicholas Salazar (District 7) opposed funding for Maryvale Police Precinct
Renovations in favor of funding projects to address homelessness, the
drug epidemic, and climate change. (Sept. 26 Report)



Page 183
Public Safety

Comments:
8. Dana Sporaa (District 1) stated the Cactus Park Precinct had not been an
adequate facilitate for Police work for a long time and it should be the
highest priority to have a new building as soon as possible. He
recommended the Metrocenter area for potential relocation. (Oct. 7
Report)
9. Caiti C (District 1) opposed funding for the Cactus Park Precinct & Northern
Command Center Relocation, Maryvale Police Precinct Renovations, Phase
1 of the Police Driver Training Academy Track - Expansion and Repair, and
Police Property Management Warehouse Renovation. She stated these
projects would not address the true needs in the city, including police
violence against citizens, the housing crisis, and the climate crisis. (Oct. 7
Report)
10. Patrick Seifter (District 4) stated there should be no new facilities or
funding for the deadliest police force in the country, specifically noting his
opposition to funding for the Cactus Park Precinct & Northern Command
Center Relocation, Maryvale Police Precinct Renovations, Phase 1 of the
Police Driver Training Track - Expansion and Repair, and the Police Property
Management Warehouse Renovation. (Oct. 7 Report)
11. Katarina Lujic (District 7) opposed Phase 1 of the Police Driver Training
Track - Expansion and Repair, stating it would be inappropriate and does
not address the Police Department’s notoriety for being needlessly violent
and ineffective. (Oct. 7 Report)
12. Kissa Powell (District 8) opposed Phase 1 of the Police Driver Training Track
- Expansion and Repair, stating the funds would be better allocated to
providing increased facilities to address and serve the unhoused
population. (Oct. 7 Report)


Page 184
Public Safety

Comments:
13. Andrea Golfen (District 4) opposed funding for Police projects and
advocated the funds be spent on community services and affordable
housing. (Oct. 7 Report)
14. Kiana Cole (District 6) stated no more money needed to go to Police and
opposed funding for Police Driver Training Track Expansion and Repair,
Maryvale Police Precinct Renovations, Cactus Park Precinct & Northern
Command Center Relocation, and Police Property Management
Warehouse Renovation.




Page 185
Streets & Storm Drainage
The percent of residents indicating “yes” or “no” for the Streets & Storm
Drainage category, by district
100%
90%
80%
70%
Page 186
60%
50%
40%
30% 60% 65%
50% 54% 50%
20% 40% 42% 39% 44%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
Yes No


number of submissions (N) = 177
Streets & Storm Drainage

Equity Based Transportation Mobility - T2050 Mobility
Implementation: $20.2 million


Design and construct recommended mobility improvements including
curb, gutter, sidewalk, ADA ramps, streetlights, traffic calming, safe
HAWK crossings, traffic signals, and tree/shade landscaping. Low
Impact Development and Green Infrastructure may be considered in
the design of these projects.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 88%
79%
30% 55% 55%
20% 47% 47%
38% 36%
10% 25%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 187
Streets & Storm Drainage

Hohokam Drainage Program: $27.7 million


Implement the Hohokam Area Drainage Master Plan that was
prepared in collaboration with the Flood Control District of Maricopa
County. Design and construct a series of storm sewer drainage basins
and pipes that extends the storm drainage system in the area south of
Baseline Road to Dobbins Road, and 14th Street to 21st Street.
(Baseline Road to Dobbins Road & 14th street to 21st Street)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 58%
52% 53%
20% 42% 36% 40% 36%
29% 31%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 188
Streets & Storm Drainage

Laveen Flood Mitigation Projects: $11.9 million


Implement drainage mitigation options to reduce flood impacts in
four areas of Laveen. These projects were recommended in the 2022
Laveen Area Drainage Feasibility Study.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 75%
30% 55%
46% 46% 52% 47%
20% 40%
31% 32%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No


N = 177




Page 189
Streets & Storm Drainage

Neighborhood Traffic Mitigation: $12 million


Implement a resident-driven process to install traffic calming devices
on residential streets including speed humps, speed cushions, traffic
circles, diverters and other hardscape elements.
(Citywide)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 56% 59%
49% 53% 52%
20% 44% 46%
38% 36%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No


N = 177




Page 190
Streets & Storm Drainage

Pavement Maintenance Supplement: $35.4 million


Supplement the Accelerated Pavement Maintenance Program by
extending the neighborhood street mill and overlay program for an
additional five years at an estimated $1 million per residential quarter
section.
(Citywide)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 60% 56% 54%
47% 52% 47%
20% 42% 36% 39%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 191
Streets & Storm Drainage

Storm Drain Replacement Program: $28.3 million


Replace deteriorating metal storm drain pipe with new reinforced
concrete pipe. Approximately one to two miles of pipe would be
replaced each year.
(Various)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
73% 71%
30% 60% 56%
54% 50% 53%
20% 45%
39%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 192
Streets & Storm Drainage

Vision Zero Implementation: $25.2 million


Supplement the Council-approved Road Safety Action Plan and
leverage various Federal funding opportunities toward becoming a
Vision Zero city. Identify, design, and implement roadway safety
countermeasures that address locations and behaviors related to fatal
and serious injury accidents.
(Citywide)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40% 75%
30% 67% 60%
53% 55%
20% 42% 45% 41%
31%
10%
0%
Citywide D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8
% Yes % No

N = 177




Page 193
Streets & Storm Drainage

Comments:
1. Dave Eichelman (District 3) supported funding for implementation of
Equity Based Transportation Mobility and proposed pedestrian bridges or
underpasses be built instead of High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk (HAWK)
signals. Mr. Eichelman opposed Neighborhood Traffic Mitigation funding.
As alternatives to speed bumps and traffic circles, he recommended
implementing narrower roads with protected bike lanes, street parking
with landscaping, and changes to traffic light timing to reduce driver
speed. (July 2022)
2. Karen Gresham (District 6) supported funding for the Pavement
Maintenance Supplement and Vision Zero Implementation, requesting
expansion of cool pavement for heat mitigation and protected bike lanes.
(July 2022)
3. Nicholas Salazar (District 7) opposed funding for the current Pavement
Maintenance Supplement plan and advocated for concrete that will last
and realize cost savings. He also advocated for making Phoenix people-
centered, not car-centered, and increasing funding towards public
transportation, to address road safety problems. (Sept. 26 Report)
4. Dana Sporaa (District 1) supported road safety improvements throughout
the city and noted safety could not be improved without adequate Police
patrol staffing. (Oct. 7 Report)
5. Michael Tarek (District 6) supported funding for Equity Based
Transportation Mobility - T2050 Mobility Implementation, Neighborhood
Traffic Mitigation, and Vision Zero Implementation, emphasizing the need
for speed radar enforcement on major and collector streets to decrease
the number of pedestrian and auto-related deaths and injuries. (Oct. 7
Report)


Page 194
Share Your GO Bond Ideas
The amount reallocated to build-your-own GO Bond ideas by district
$6,000,000,000

$5,000,000,000

$4,000,000,000

Page 195
$3,000,000,000

$2,000,000,000

$1,000,000,000

$-
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 Citywide
Total
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 Citywide Total
Amount of
Submissions $955,000,000 $510,000,000 $192,000,000 $905,000,000 $295,000,000 $1,488,000,000 $573,000,000 $442,000,000 $5,360,000,000
Number of
Submissions 19 11 6 23 8 29 29 12 137
Number of
Submitters 8 7 4 10 4 20 14 7 74
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments:
1. Margaret Garcia (District 8) proposed funding for multifamily affordable
housing with a neighborhood pool and produce market in the Garfield
neighborhood ($10M). Ms. Garcia also requested funding for a community
solar fund to install solar panels in non-profit and low-income residential
spaces ($20M), as well as funding for social workers to respond to mental
health calls ($21M). (July 2022)
(Housing, Human Services & Homelessness - $31M; Environment &
Sustainability - $20M)
2. Bob Carr (District 7) requested funding to improve public transit in West
Phoenix, such as further expanding light rail or bus rapid transit, to
connect neighborhoods to the airport and Downtown Phoenix ($2M). (July
2022)
(Neighborhoods & City Services/Streets & Storm Drainage - $2M)
3. Michelle Moses (District 2) requested more usable parks for children
within city limits and expanding parks such as Los Olivos with larger play
structures and more shade ($28M). (July 2022)
(Parks & Recreation/Environment & Sustainability - $28M)
4. Aaron Kane (District 4) requested additional funding for unspecified GO
Bond priorities ($90M). (July 2022)
5. Karen Gresham (District 6) proposed funding for affordable housing and to
address homelessness ($150M). Ms. Gresham also requested funding to
address climate change and for heat mitigation measures such as shade
trees, more green space, electric vehicle charging stations, lighter colored
asphalt, and bike-friendly initiatives ($150M). (July 2022)
(Housing, Human Services & Homelessness - $150M; Environment &
Sustainability - $150M)

Page 196
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
6. Stacie Beute (District 2) requested funding for affordable housing ($344M).
(July 2022)
(Housing, Human Services & Homelessness - $344M)
7. Nick Tripoli (District 8) proposed investments in sheltering people
experiencing homelessness and to address housing affordability in Phoenix
($38M). (July 2022)
(Housing, Human Services & Homelessness - $38M)
8. Mel Cameron (District 6) stated it would not make economic sense to
replace capital projects that are still functional, and that more thought
should go into upgrades for ADA compliance. Ms. Cameron opposed
building new pools due to staffing shortages for existing pools. (July 2022)
(Neighborhoods & City Services; Parks & Recreation)
9. Jennifer Purdon (District 5) requested funding for Trap, Neuter, Return
services for stray or feral cats in communities and improvements to
facilities and staffing at Maricopa County Animal Care and Control ($10M).
Ms. Purdon also requested funding to improve educational services in
Phoenix middle and high schools, including expansion of after school
educational opportunities, home school assistance, and teacher
recruitment ($10M). (July 2022)
(Neighborhoods & City Services - $10M; Housing, Human Services &
Homelessness - $10M)
10. Elizabeth Neilon (District 5) requested funding to create tree canopies
along Phoenix streets and in neighborhoods, and to encourage businesses
to use solar and reusable energy ($10M) Ms. Neilon also proposed funding
for indoor play spaces for children ($10M). (Aug. 12 Report)
(Environment & Sustainability - $10M; Parks & Recreation - $10M)

Page 197
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
11. Jackson Modrak (District 4) requested funding to conserve and enhance
historic neighborhoods, upgrade sidewalks on Roosevelt Row, and install
and maintain trees and shade ($10M). (Aug. 12 Report)
(Neighborhoods & City Services; Streets & Storm Drainage; Environment &
Sustainability - $10M)
12. Kristie Carson (District 4) proposed a Light Rail Beautification Maintenance
Fund for trees, benches, and desert adapted landscape, as well as funding
for Willo and historic district residents to convert all-grass front yards to
turf and other water conserving landscapes ($2M). (Aug. 12 Report)
(Neighborhoods & City Services; Environment & Sustainability - $2M)
13. Dulce Arambula proposed the City partner with Source Co and procure a
design team to provide water stations at bus stops throughout the city for
all residents, including those who are unsheltered. Ms. Arambula also
requested funding to fund two new housing facilities for those who are
unsheltered, like those built in Los Angeles, as well as more Light Rail lines
($20M). (Aug. 12 Report)
(Neighborhoods & City Services; Housing, Human Services, and
Homelessness - $20M)
14. Joshua Klemm (District 6) proposed funding for more fire stations. (Aug. 12
Report) (Public Safety)
15. David Leibowitz requested funding for new fire engines ($20M) and
additional ambulances ($20M) to improve response times. (Aug. 12
Report)
(Public Safety - $40M)




Page 198
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
16. Sandra Bassett (District 7) requested funding to renovate and rehabilitate
the Phoenix Center for the Arts, including a new roof, repairing structural
cracks, HVAC, plumbing, water stains, faded paint, replacing aged and
broken theatrical lighting and sound equipment, installing security
infrastructure, installing a shade canopy, displaying new art installations,
and replacing deteriorated flooring. (Aug. 12 Report)
(Parks & Recreation)
17. Dan Penton requested funding for a new Aquatic Park and Swim Center at
Cesar Chavez Park ($14M), new trailheads, ramadas, and facilities at South
Mountain Park locations in Laveen ($21M); and a new fire station and
Community Assistance Program at 35th Avenue and Baseline Road. (Aug.
12 Report)
(Parks & Recreation - $35M; Public Safety)
18. Brandon Sunder (District 1) requested additional funding for unspecified
GO Bond priorities ($150M). (Aug. 12 Report)
19. Laura Bowling (District 3) requested funding to pave the wash located
north of John Jacobs Elementary School (14421 N. 23rd Avenue) due to
erosion and gopher tunnels ($1M). (Aug. 12 Report)
(Streets & Storm Drainage - $1M)
20. Terry Klemm (District 6) requested funding for maintenance of fire
stations, specifically Stations 20, 70, and 77 ($18M). (Aug. 12 Report)
(Public Safety - $18M)
21. Emily M (District 2) proposed funding for more fire stations ($20M). (Aug.
12 Report)
(Public Safety - $20M)


Page 199
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
22. Braden Kay (District 4) proposed funding for a Resilient Energy Hub pilot
project, modeled after Envision Tempe, to retrofit cooling centers with
solar and battery storage to ensure heat vulnerable neighborhoods could
access a cooling center during a power outage. Mr. Kay also requested
funding for a residential green stormwater infrastructure fund, through
which neighborhoods could apply for funding to add curb cuts, bioswales,
and other green stormwater elements to neighborhood streets and parks,
prioritizing neighborhoods with high heat vulnerability. Mr. Kay also
proposed funding community electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, using
GO Bond funds to match federal funding to ensure Phoenix can equitably
deploy EV chargers in areas where the market is less likely to build them.
(Aug. 30 Report) (Environment & Sustainability; Streets & Storm Drainage)
23. Jeff Spellman (District 5) proposed funding bikeway renovations
throughout the City in areas of greatest need, including safety
enhancements, lighting, planting trees, and leveraging GO Bond funds with
federal grants like the Land and Water Conservation Fund or the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA-LU)($20M). (Aug. 30 Report)
(Streets & Storm Drainage - $20M)
24. Jennifer Dangremond (District 6) proposed the creation of a fund to
support property repairs and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
upgrades for multifamily units owned by in-state property owners who
accept Section 8, VASH, or Foster Youth vouchers for a minimum of five
years. Ms. Dangremond also requested the City procure a transitional
housing project for youth experiencing homelessness, including project
construction and the first year of operating funds, plus a combination of
voucher and resident co-pays after the second year. (Aug. 30 Report)
(Housing, Human Services, and Homelessness)

Page 200
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
25. Jeff Sherman (District 7) proposed funding for improvements to Rio Salado
Park; adding multi-use paths citywide, canal path improvements and grade
separations; and to convert storm drains to bioswales and nature recovery
in Central Phoenix through water capture, tree plantings, and nature
paths. (Aug. 30 Report)
(Parks & Recreation; Environment & Sustainability)
26. George Colberg (District 2) requested funding to support a biomedical
research and development non-profit partnership between the Biomedical
Research Institute of Arizona (BRIA) and Pathfinder. (Aug. 30 Report)
(Economic Development and Education)
27. Liz C (District 7) requested funding to renovate Phoenix Center for the Arts,
including removal of the front stairs, for students and the community
($10M); create a fund for repairs at homeless shelters such as HVAC
improvements ($15M); and build an Asian Cultural Center with grocery,
food, and shopping options ($18M). (Sept. 9 Report)
(Arts & Culture; Housing, Human Services, and Homelessness; Economic
Development & Education)
28. David Madden (District 6) requested funding to renovate the Arizona
Science Center to improve quality and increase capacity for guests such as
school groups from across the state, to provide opportunities students
may not already have at school ($10M). Mr. Madden also proposed
integrating school buses and Valley Metro buses ($5M) and further
develop public transportation, including electrification of the fleet ($10M).
(Sept. 9 Report)(Arts & Culture; Neighborhoods & City Services;
Environment & Sustainability)



Page 201
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
29. Rebecca Perrera (District 7) requested additional funding for unspecified
GO Bond priorities ($5M). (Sept. 9 Report)
30. Patricia Rethore-Larson (District 8) submitted a request to dramatically
increase funding toward the homeless and housing crisis, and to construct
more short-term shelter and transitional housing to support the unhoused
($205M). Ms. Rethore-Larson also proposed funding for mobile support
units for the unhoused to provide showers and bathrooms to support
basic hygiene, distribute water and simple portable meals, offer basic
medical services and mental health support, and provide basic veterinary
care for animal companions ($80M). She recommended deploying the
mobile units based on a needs assessment conducted throughout
neighborhoods across Phoenix. (Sept. 9 Report)
(Housing, Human Services, and Homelessness)
31. Christopher Alt (District 6) requested funding to invest in parking shade
and rooftop photovoltaics for city-owned properties ($197M). Mr. Alt also
proposed improvements to the 99th Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant,
including increasing capacity, improving treatment to remove heavy metals
and pharmaceuticals, and expanding the Tres Rios Wetlands ($201M).
(Sept. 9 Report) (Environment & Sustainability)
32. Christiana Moss (District 6) proposed divesting from the Palo Verde
Nuclear Generating Station and investing in solar power ($65M). Ms. Moss
also requested funding for net-zero water, recycling 100 percent black
water to potable wastewater instead of using it to cool Palo Verde ($64M).
(Sept. 9 Report) (Environment & Sustainability)
33. John Strauss (District 1) requested funding for a new community center in
the proximity and north of Metrocenter, from Dunlap to Cactus, 43rd
Avenue to Interstate 17 ($200M). (Sept. 9 Report)
(Neighborhoods & City Services)



Page 202
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
34. Abeth Spencer (District 3) proposed additional funding to plant trees to
meet the City’s goal to double the shade canopy by 2030 ($10M). Ms.
Spencer also requested funding to improve recycling facility infrastructure
to work towards the City’s Zero Waste goal ($70M). (Sept. 9 Report)
(Environment & Sustainability)
35. Van Escobar (District 4) proposed funding for more affordable housing and
to address homelessness ($200M). Mr. Escobar also requested
rehabilitation centers for drug users ($100M) and investment in public
education and after school programs for children in underprivileged areas
($104M). (Sept. 9 Report)
(Neighborhoods & City Services; Economic Development & Education)
36. Bianca Jimenez (District 3) proposed funding to purchase and construct
tiny homes or condos for unsheltered people using sustainable strategies,
located in areas along the perimeter of the valley, within walking distance
of public transportation, or adjacent to schools for families with high need
($11M). (Sept. 9 Report)
(Housing, Human Services, and Homelessness)
37. Stan Flowers (District 8) requested additional funding for unspecified GO
Bond priorities ($23M). (Sept. 9 Report)
38. Bruce Mazur (District 3) requested funding for the Fire Department
($100M). (Sept. 9 Report)
(Public Safety)




Page 203
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
39. Ciara Rubalcava (District 6) requested funding for 400 additional
firefighters by 2030 and to add three fire stations ($100M). (Sept. 9
Report) (Public Safety)
40. Michael Rubalcava (District 6) requested funding for 400 additional
firefighters by 2030 and to add four fire stations with apparatus ($100M).
(Sept. 9 Report) (Public Safety)
41. Brad Francis (District 5) requested additional funding for unspecified GO
Bond priorities ($200M). (Sept. 9 Report)
42. Linda Chambre (District 6) requested additional funding for unspecified GO
Bond priorities ($1M). (Sept. 9 Report)
43. Marshall Zeable (District 1) requested funding for more fire stations
($22M) and to utilize unused city parks for fire stations, such as in the area
of 40th Street and Bell Road ($5M). (Sept. 9 Report)
(Public Safety)
44. Michael Bonney (District 1) requested funding for more fire stations
($50M) and more fire engines ($15M). (Sept. 9 Report)
(Public Safety)
45. Chrissy Bonney (District 1) requested funding for new fire stations ($75M),
fire engines and ambulances ($46M), and to hire new Police and Fire staff
($75M). (Sept. 9 Report)
(Public Safety)
46. Ronald Russell (District 4) proposed funding for a cooperative housing
collective, specifically 310 community-owned one- and two-bedroom
condos/townhomes in the East Valley ($31M). (Sept. 9 Report)
(Housing, Human Services, and Homelessness)

Page 204
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
47. Ryan Self (District 7) proposed additional funding to construct and improve
infrastructure in the Estrella area between Buckeye Road and Broadway
Road from 83rd Avenue to 107th Avenue, specifically along Lower Buckeye
Road between 83rd and 99th Avenues. Mr. Self specifically requested
street infrastructure and drainage, shade structures, and developments for
medical offices, shopping, restaurants, and entertainment. He mentioned
commute delays caused by one-lane roads and empty lots that
exacerbated air quality and dust issues. Mr. Self reiterated his request for
funding to expand and connect the Estrella area to the transit systems of
Phoenix, Avondale, and Goodyear ($25M). He also requested funding to
accelerate the development and build out of the Estrella Civic Center to
enhance amenities and services including the park, swimming pool, shade,
library, fire station, and a community assistance program (CAP) office
($1M). (Sept. 26 Report)
(Neighborhoods & City Services; Streets & Storm Drainage; Parks &
Recreation; Public Safety)
48. Luke Tate (District 6) requested funding to upgrade all Phoenix streets and
parks, especially in Central, South, and West Phoenix, to the levels of
design, quality and maintenance as North Scottsdale and Anthem. (Sept.
26 Report)
(Streets & Storm Drainage; Parks & Recreation)
49. Colleen OHara (District 2) requested funding for mandatory driver
education before licensing ($3M). (Sept. 26 Report)
(Neighborhoods & City Services; Public Safety)
50. Nicholas Salazar (District 7) requested funding to increase the city’s shade
canopy, advance the city through electrification of transportation and
more EV charging stations, increase solar capacity, and investing in the
homeless population ($50M). (Sept. 26 Report)
(Environment & Sustainability; Housing, Human Services, and
Homelessness)


Page 205
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
51. Lance Morgan (District 2) requested more funding for roadway safety
initiatives such as converting intersections to flashing yellow arrow for left
hand turns or adding an arrow before turning and activating more Police
motor units for nighttime driving while intoxicated (DWI) enforcement
($3M). (Sept. 26 Report)
(Streets & Storm Drainage; Public Safety)
52. Kimberly Socha (District 2) proposed funding for citywide brownfields
redevelopment projects targeting the Rio Reimagined Project Area, West
Phoenix Revitalization Area, Infill Incentive Area, Transit Oriented
Development Areas, Downtown Development Area, Designated
Redevelopment Areas and Neighborhood Initiative Areas ($5M). She also
advocated to off-set private investment in public infrastructure such as
street and drainage improvements ($5M) and expressed support for the
Microelectronics Health Science & Technology Center ($18M). (Sept. 26
Report)
(Environment & Sustainability; Economic Development & Education)
53. Darian Evangelista (District 7) requested funding for a new police station in
west Laveen ($23M). (Sept. 26 Report)
(Public Safety)
54. Y K (District 6) proposed funding for more small, shaded playgrounds and
opening all school playgrounds to residents in the off-hours ($5M). (Sept.
26 Report) (Parks & Recreation)
55. Donovan Swanson (District 7) proposed funding for urban tree planting
near roadways, parks and greenbelts, parking lots, and on rooftops
($11M). He also requested funding for dedicated bike paths around the
city ($5M). (Sept. 26 Report)
(Environment & Sustainability; Streets & Storm Drainage)

Page 206
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
56. Kristen Browne (District 7) proposed $5M for unspecified GO Bond
priorities. (Sept. 26 Report)
57. Clint Williams (District 6) requested funding to build the planned library
branch and fire station at Chandler Road and 19th Avenue near the South
Mountain Park trailhead ($3M). (Sept. 26 Report)
(Neighborhoods & City Services; Public Safety)
58. Lacey Ballantyne (District 8) requested additional funding for heat
resiliency ($11M) as well as the Spark Area Land Acquisition - Reuse and
Redevelopment Strategy Implementation ($2M). (Oct. 14 Report)
(Environment & Sustainability; Economic Development & Education)
59. Michael Tarek (District 6) requested funding to install radar cameras on
major streets and more mid-block pedestrian crossings with signals. Mr.
Tarek advocated for shade tree-lined walkways in and around parks and
along all collector and major streets. (Oct. 14 Report)
(Streets & Storm Drainage; Parks & Recreation; Environment &
Sustainability)
60. Coby Bruckner (District 7) advocated for funding to be allocated to critical
landscape improvements and proper environment and ecological
management ($10M), as well as more tree planting and education for
employees and residents on proper care ($10M). Mr. Brucker also
advocated for the creation of more public transportation options in high
density areas, including a multimodal approach and more green/low
impact design ($150M). (Oct. 14 Report)
(Environment & Sustainability; Parks & Recreation; Neighborhoods & City
Services; Streets & Storm Drainage)



Page 207
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
61. Selena Slay (District 7) requested funding to complete the Cesar Chavez
Community Center, which would benefit the Laveen community by
providing a supervised and safe space for youth to explore themselves and
their interests ($21M). (Oct. 14 Report)
(Parks & Recreation)
62. Terry O’Brien (District 1) advocated for funding additional improvements
to aging Police facilities and equipment ($50M). Mr. O’Brien also
requested funding to improve aging Fire equipment and living conditions,
as well as street maintenance for older roads and landscaping ($25M).
(Oct. 14 Report) (Public Safety; Streets & Storm Drainage)
63. Patrick Seifter (District 4) proposed decreasing the Police budget by a
minimum of 40% to be reallocated to affordable housing and social worker
crisis response units, as well as selling the City’s inventory of Police drones.
Mr. Seifter advocated for more funding towards environmental fixes
($10M). (Oct. 14 Report)
(Public Safety; Housing, Human Services, and Homelessness; Environment
& Sustainability)
64. Megyn Neff (District 4) requested funding for harm reduction safe
equipment and spaces for intravenous drug users ($5M). Ms. Neff also
advocated to fund shelters and resources for unhoused individuals in
Central Phoenix, providing access to low income and traditional housing
with job training, and mental health and medical resources ($75M). She
also proposed funding for more natural spaces, shade tree infrastructure,
water reclamation ($100M). (Oct. 14 Report)
(Housing, Human Services, and Homelessness; Environment &
Sustainability; Parks & Recreation)


Page 208
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
65. Daniel Schaefer (District 6) advocated for additional funding to plant more
trees and noted many benefits, including mitigating the heat island effect,
increasing biodiversity, capturing carbon emissions, improving
groundwater cleanliness and soil health, erosion reduction, and promoting
cultural value. (Oct. 14 Report)
(Environment & Sustainability; Parks & Recreation; Streets & Storm
Drainage)
66. Katarina Lujic (District 7) requested funding for mental health crisis lines to
answer non-emergency calls, as well as rental assistance prioritizing single
women and children for homeless individuals and families on the brink of
homelessness ($3M). (Oct. 14 Report)
(Housing, Human Services, and Homelessness; Public Safety;
Neighborhoods & City Services)
67. Kissa Powell (District 8) advocated for funding for environmental and
sustainability initiatives, such as improved public transportation ($1M).
(Oct. 14 Report) (Environment & Sustainability; Neighborhoods & City
Services)
68. Andrea Golfen (District 4) proposed reallocating Police funds to affordable
housing, community services and pedestrian safety ($2M).
(Oct. 14 Report) (Public Safety; Housing, Human Services, and
Homelessness; Neighborhoods & City Services; Streets & Storm Drainage)
69. Dorothy Mason (District 8) requested funding for a community center at
Esteban Park and for the creation of a reserve fund for unidentified
projects ($15M). (Oct. 14 Report)
(Parks & Recreation)



Page 209
Share Your GO Bond Ideas

Comments, continued:
70. Matthew Gomez (District 4) requested funding for citywide participatory
budgeting and affordable housing and shelter for those experiencing
homelessness near Central Arizona Shelter Services (CASS) ($1M).
(Neighborhoods & City Services; Housing, Human Services, and
Homelessness)
71. Kiana Cole (District 6) proposed $30M for unspecified GO Bond priorities.
72. Jenni Harris (District 6) advocated for funding for Fire Station 74 due to
continued growth in the area ($10M).
(Public Safety)
73. Adrien Mikalukidi (District 1) proposed $4M for unspecified GO Bond
priorities.
74. Amanda Branum (District 1) proposed $3M to install reduced speed limit
signs, flashing speed limit signs, and crosswalks for approved school zones
that have been on lengthy wait lists. She also proposed using this funding
to replace worn out playground equipment (e.g. soft mats, baby swings,
rock walls, and sun sails), maintain sand volleyball courts, and service
broken doors and equipment at the Goelet A. C. Beuf Community Center.
(Streets & Storm Drainage; Parks & Recreation)




Page 210