Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.





ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: April 8, 2026
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Board of Adjustment

I recommend the following for appointment:

Michael Anglin
Mr. Anglin is a Senior Architect at City of Glendale and a resident of District 5. He fills a
vacancy for a term to expire April 8, 2030.

Historic Preservation Commission and Heritage Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Christopher Caseldine
Mr. Caseldine is an Assistant Research Professor and Curator of Collections at Arizona
State University and a resident of District 4. He fills a vacancy in the Archeologist
category for a term to expire April 8, 2029.

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee

I recommend the following for appointment:

Mark Borenstein
Mr. Borenstein is a Project Manager at Chompie’s and a resident of District 2. He fills a
vacancy for a term to expire April 8, 2028.




Councilwoman Debra Stark recommends the following for appointment:

Broc Penner
Mr. Penner is a Loan Officer at Mutual of Omaha Mortgage and a resident of District 3.
He fills a vacancy for a term to expire April 8, 2028.

Water/Wastewater Rate Advisory Committee

I recommend the following for reappointment:

Henrietta Andersson
Ms. Andersson will serve a third term to expire April 8, 2029.

Jay Cantor
Mr. Cantor will serve a second term to expire April 8, 2029.

Margaret Garcia
Ms. Garcia will serve a second term to expire April 8, 2029.

Karen Loschiavo
Ms. Loschiavo will serve a second term to expire April 8, 2029.

Joe Murphy
Mr. Murphy will serve a second term to expire April 8, 2029.

Dave White
Mr. White will serve a third term to expire April 8, 2029.

Joseph Widoff
Mr. Widoff will serve a third term to expire April 8, 2029.

Damon Williams
Mr. Williams will serve a third term to expire April 8, 2029.

Youth and Education Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Violet Breedlove
Ms. Breedlove is a student at Xavier College Preparatory and a resident of District 3.
She fills a vacancy as a youth commissioner for a term to expire August 31, 2027.







Report

Liquor License - Lupe - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 381874.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2814 N. 16th Street
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 11, 2026.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations



on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Huarachis (Series 12)
814 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 1
Liquor license violations: None

Bacanora (Series 12)
1301 Grand Avenue, Ste. 1, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 14
Liquor license violation: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service."

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Lupe will offer a chef-inspired menu, featuring salads, appetizers, hearty items such
as duck, pork chops, salmon, a variety of steaks and homemade pasta. Applicant
would like to offer alcoholic beverages to guests 21 and over as an incident to the
dishes.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.






Attachments
Attachment A - Lupe - Data
Attachment B - Lupe - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: LUPE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Bar 6 7 2

Liquor Store 9 4 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 9 3

Restaurant 12 8 2


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 132.66 161.35

Violent Crimes 12.31 28.37 44.9

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 42 147

Total Violations 73 224




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1106004 1350 265 59 196

1107012 1274 194 61 154

1116021 374 0 46 98

1116022 2191 365 78 589

1116023 1740 67 23 197

1117001 1240 396 65 217

1117002 1143 416 44 64

1117004 1426 315 66 49

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: LUPE
2814 N 16TH ST




Date: 2/11/2026




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Turney Neighborhood Market - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 380352.

Summary

Applicant
Deidre Young-Goro, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
710 E. Turney Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 14, 2026.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have strong business ethics, operational discipline, and commitment to compliance. I
understand having a liquor license is a privelege and a responsibility, and I take that
very seriously. Given my professional background, I know how to enforce clear policies
that ensure lawful and ethical operations at all times.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It will be managed by a well-operated establishment, we will operate with strict age
verification procedures, responsible training, and clear policies, and maintain public
safety while also providing customers with what they want.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Turney Neighborhood Market - Data
Attachment B - Turney Neighborhood Market - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Pathway to Work - District 6

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Nancy Claussen

Location
5031 E. Washington Street
Council District: 6

Function
Award Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 25, 2026 - 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 150 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - St. Theresa Council No 13497 Knights
Columbus - District 6

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Michael Harris

Location
5045 E. Thomas Road
Council District: 6

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
May 9, 2026 - 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 50 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Cheba Hut Toasted Subs - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 381258.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
3162 E. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2, C-2 SP
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 10, 2026.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes information about any



liquor license violations on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control
and, for locations within the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for
police service within the last 12 months for the address listed.

Cheba Hut (Series 12)
8776 E. Shea Boulevard, Ste. 100, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Cheba Hut (Series 12)
17025 N. Scottsdale Road, Ste. 150, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owners have two other locations that have been operating successfully. All
locations will continue to abide by all laws including Title 4 liquor laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location has been open and operating serving the local customers.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Cheba Hut Toasted Subs - Data
Attachment B - Cheba Hut Toasted Subs - Map






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: CHEBA HUT TOASTED SUBS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 5 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 2

Liquor Store 9 2 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 4

Restaurant 12 23 11


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 122.85 157.85

Violent Crimes 12.31 19.21 25.79

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 42 43

Total Violations 73 80




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1083021 1269 360 68 58

1084001 369 67 141 0

1084002 1348 427 93 67

1084004 1540 380 246 135

1084005 989 109 57 230

1108011 1965 414 124 372

1108012 1583 396 149 158

1108013 1394 423 128 286

1109011 1092 393 51 29

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: CHEBA HUT TOASTED SUBS
3162 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD




Date: 2/10/2026




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Shake Shack #1771 - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 380340.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4280 E. Indian School Road, Ste. 101
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was April 5, 2026. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.




Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards to maintain compliance
with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the techniques of legal and
responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Shake Shack offers wide variety of customized delicious burgers, hot dogs, frozen
custard, shakes and more in a modern-day neighborhood restaurant. Applicant would
like to offer alcoholic beverages as an incident to the delicious meals served.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Shake Shack #1771 - Data
Attachment B - Shake Shack #1771 - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: SHAKE SHACK #1771
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Wholesaler 4 2 2

Bar 6 6 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 2

Liquor Store 9 7 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 3

Restaurant 12 25 12


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 81.68 109.34

Violent Crimes 12.31 7.29 10.29
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 60

Total Violations 73 90




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1082001 1074 308 30 111

1082002 1052 330 52 241

1082003 1237 375 35 61

1083022 1419 351 90 116

1109022 2584 472 149 528

1110001 1097 117 20 93

1110002 891 325 25 43

1110004 975 299 41 0

1110005 568 200 20 0

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: SHAKE SHACK #1771
4280 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD




Date: 2/9/2026




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Buckeye Market - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 383700.

Summary

Applicant
Munther Abuarar, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
3518 W. Buckeye Road
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 12, 2026.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am responsible and committed to complying with all applicable laws and regulations.
I understand the importance of operating a licensed business ethically and safely. Me
and my staff ensure proper recordkeeping and meeting legal standers.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The operation will prioritize responsible service, customer safety, and positive
community engagement.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Buckeye Market - Data
Attachment B - Buckeye Market - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: BUCKEYE MARKET
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Liquor Store 9 2 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 4


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 74.84 91.29

Violent Crimes 12.31 16.64 18.25
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 42 39

Total Violations 73 75



Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1125141 2232 357 40 378

1145002 498 48 50 206

1145003 1583 235 58 319

1146001 1754 218 48 367

1147041 2019 203 40 536

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: BUCKEYE MARKET
3518 W BUCKEYE RD




Date: 2/13/2026




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Oro De Sonora - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 379369.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 18 - Craft Distiller

Location
910 W. Jackson Street, Ste. 22
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a distillery. This location was not previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 11, 2026.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations



on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Oro De Sonora (Series 18)
910 W. Jackson Street, Ste. 17, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 45
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We have taken Title IV and Management Liquor License courses, and are committed
to operating within local, state, and federal guidelines.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We will responsibly operate our business and abide by all federal, state, and local
laws. We hope to grow our small distillery, and provide quality jobs to the local
economy.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Oro De Sonora - Data
Attachment B - Oro De Sonora - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





012345ÿ0178 8ÿ ÿÿÿ
12345ÿ178 8
8 751149 8518 ÿ18 ÿ18
 !"!# $ % &
'(!)*!)+ , $ &
-. / 01 0
-!!ÿ.)3ÿ4)!ÿ-. 1 5 &
678ÿ9+! : , &
-!!ÿ.)3ÿ4)!ÿ9+! %& %, %
;+!< %% , &
=!>+.8.)+ %0 5& %
?<8 %5 0 &

@51A8ÿ
8 751149 B85C8ÿD ÿ18ÿB85C8ÿDD ÿ18ÿB85C8DDD
EF!+#ÿ?*!> /5G0 0$$G1$ %H$G&%
I %0G$% H%G&, %&HG,:
J?+#"3!ÿ.(!.K!ÿF!ÿ>78.!ÿ*78.!ÿ*ÿJJJL(!.K!ÿF!ÿ>78.!ÿ*

O5485PÿQ14 149ÿ
8 751149 B85C8 ÿ18ÿB85C8
E.!<>ÿ"RI<.+)> 50 5,
S+.<ÿI<.+)> 15 1,




012343ÿ6767ÿ899ÿ 6ÿ 1ÿ943
4 6767ÿ492 21ÿ41 13129ÿ992 1323ÿ2ÿ1
!"" #$ " %& !'
!""& #% !! '" %"
&"" ! ! '# (( $'&
'"" #"( $  $#
' "" !&% " % #$
'&" ! %" '! &$'
'&"  &$# !& &$ $!
'&"  $ &" #% &##
)*+,-.+ #" &!& #" $$







Report

Liquor License - Lynx Distribution - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 382014.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 4 - Wholesaler

Location
4234 E. University Drive, Ste. 1A
Zoning Classification: A-2
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a wholesaler. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
has plans to open in May 2026.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 12, 2026.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration may be given only to the applicant's personal
qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,



grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We have taken Title IV and Management liquor license courses, and are committed to
operating within local, state, federal guidelines.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Tacos Del Pepe 2 LLC - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 384031.

Summary

Applicant
Francisco Castillo Granillo, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
702 E. Baseline Road, Ste. 2
Zoning Classification: C-2 BAOD
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 13, 2026.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
"I have the capability, qualifications and realibility to hold a liquor license because I'm
commited to operating my business in full compliance with all state and local
regulations. I understand all the legal abligations associated with alcohol sales and
have implemented procedures to ensure staff training, ID verification and responsible
sales I am committed to maintaining my business in a safe and lawful establishment."

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially servedby the issuance of the liquor license because it will allowed us to
provice to the customer a full dining expirience. Offering alcoholic veverages with
meals meets customers and supports the financial sustainability of our restaurant. We
will operate following all the liquour regulations to maintain a safe damily enviroment."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Tacos Del Pepe 2 LLC - Data
Attachment B - Tacos Del Pepe 2 LLC - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: TACOS DEL PEPE 2 LLC
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Liquor Store 9 3 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 1

Restaurant 12 3 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 120.32 107.32

Violent Crimes 12.31 22.82 16.98

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 42 35

Total Violations 73 44




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1164002 828 114 29 139

1164003 1819 316 22 373

1164004 1042 201 13 71

1165003 1310 183 39 552

1167031 2424 868 78 214

1167033 979 263 13 41

1167361 1231 107 15 473

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: TACOS DEL PEPE 2 LLC
702 E BASELINE RD




Date: 2/13/2026




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - AN Smoke Shop - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 371676.

Summary

Applicant
Rebhi Awawdah, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
910-912 W. Hatcher Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a tobacco shop. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was March 29, 2026. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona



This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
Three valid letters protesting the issuance of this license have been received and are
on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The letters are from the Hatcher Urban Business
Neighborhood Association and local residents. They do not support the issuance of
this new liquor license. They are concerned with the existing number of beer and wine
store and liquor store licenses in the area, and feel that adding this new license does
not meet the need and convenience of the neighborhood. They believe that adding a
new beer and wine store license with a smoke shop does not align with the
neighborhoods character, needs, or current efforts to improve the community. They are
also concerned that the issuance of this new license will have a negative effect on their
ongoing efforts to reduce crime and blight in their community.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I hold a certificate for basis Liquor Law Training to sell beer. I have never been
involved in any criminal activity never been in trouble with the law.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This store will provide a safe place for the neighborhood to buy beer & wine. The
location will be convenient for the neighborhood.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends disapproval of this application based on the neighborhood protests.
Staff also notes that the applicant must resolve any pending City of Phoenix building
and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with the CIty of Phoenix Code and
Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - AN Smoke Shop - Data
Attachment B - AN Smoke Shop - Map






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: AN SMOKE SHOP
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 0

Liquor Store 9 3 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 9 3

Restaurant 12 5 1

Club 14 1 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 151.72 126.75

Violent Crimes 12.31 44.29 39.17

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 42 98

Total Violations 73 156




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1045011 999 207 37 120

1045012 1480 48 92 336

1045013 1601 133 27 478

1045021 1452 356 26 226

1045022 2320 200 43 421

1045023 1684 161 10 398

1046001 2192 383 93 320

1046003 742 161 56 128

1053002 2247 273 65 285

1053003 1216 489 42 61

1054001 1246 488 20 0

1054002 1261 465 33 28

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: AN SMOKE SHOP
910 W HATCHER RD




Date: 1/30/2026




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Applied Economics, LLC

For $45,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about May 8, 2026,
for a term of five years for financial analysis consulting services for the Community and
Economic Development Department. This contract will provide assessment
calculations for the Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services District.








Report

Regina Munro dba Medic A&P, Inc.

For $173,750 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about June 1,
2026, for a term of five years for Biology (BIO160) Instructor services for the Fire
Department. This contract will enable the Phoenix Fire Department to secure PhD-
level instruction in Anatomy and Physiology for its paramedic training programs.
Access to this level of expertise will support the delivery of high-quality education for
paramedic students and ensure the continued delivery of excellent Advanced Life
Support services to the community.








Report

Duncor, LLC dba Summit West Signs

For $88,547 in additional payment authority for Agreement 162244, Change Order 2
(LS71200110-1) Outdoor Digital LED Signage for the Library Department. This
Change Order is necessary to cover costs associated with permit fees and related
administrative, coordination, and other associated activities that was not included as
part of the original bid submitted by the sign contractor. This project uses funding from
the American Rescue Plan Act. No General Funds are required.








Report

When to Work, LLC

For $50,000 in payment authority for an annual subscription for scheduling software for
the Parks and Recreation Department. The Aquatics section is responsible for
scheduling hundreds of part-time employees across multiple facilities, each of which
has distinct lifeguard rotation requirements based on pool size, amenities, and
operating hours. The current manual scheduling process is labor-intensive, prone to
errors, and can result in insufficient staffing or unintended overtime costs.
Implementation of the WhenToWork software will improve scheduling accuracy,
enhance communication with staff, and increase operational efficiency. The
department also intends to expand the use of this software to part-time recreation staff
at community centers, sports complexes, and the after-school program to support
consistent and efficient scheduling practices across all divisions.








Report

Phoenix Employment Relations Board (PERB) Hearing Officers

For $20,000 in retroactive payment authority for Beverly M. Massing, Carl C. Bosland,
James P. Foley, Stacy M. Gabriel, and Steven M. Guttell, to serve as Phoenix
Employment Relations Board (PERB) Hearing Officers. PERB is authorized by the
Meet and Confer Ordinance, Phoenix City Code, Sections 2-209 et seq., to engage
Hearing Officers for the purpose of conducting hearings related to charges filed under
the Ordinance.








Report

Settlement of Claim(s) Mangan v. City of Phoenix

To make payment of up to $51,795.87 in settlement of claim(s) in Mangan v. City of
Phoenix, 26-0320-001, GL, PD, for the Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City
Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of a claim involving the Water Services
Department on October 16, 2025.








Report

Landscape Sprinkler and Irrigation Supplies Contract - COOP 26-0071 Request
for Award (Ordinance S-52737) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with
Sprinkler World of Arizona, Inc. to purchase landscape sprinkler and irrigation supplies
and parts for the Aviation and Parks and Recreation departments. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total cost of
the contract will not exceed $1,600,000.

Summary
The contract will provide an array of sprinkler and irrigation supplies and parts to repair
and maintain various types of irrigation systems located in landscape areas owned and
maintained by the City. The landscape sprinkler and irrigation supplies and parts
provided through the cooperative contract will ensure that all grass, trees, and
shrubbery at various locations are watered to enhance and maintain their quality.

Procurement Information
Accordance to Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived as a
result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Special
Circumstances Alternative Competition. The City of Scottsdale cooperative agreement
was awarded through a competitive process consistent with the City's procurement
processes as set forth in the Phoenix City Code Chapter 43. The City of Scottsdale
agreement covers the purchase of landscape sprinkler and irrigation supplies as
required by the Citywide departments. The use of the cooperative contract will allow
the City to leverage government pricing on these products, which will offer the best
value.

Contract Term
The term of the contract will begin on or about April 8, 2026. The term is one-year
term with three one-year options to extend the term that may be exercised in the City's
sole discretion.

Financial Impact
The aggregate cost of the contract will not exceed $1,600,000 over the four-year
aggregate term. Funding is available in the Aviation and Parks and Recreation



departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Frank McCune and Cynthia Aguilar
and the Aviation and Parks and Recreation departments.








Report

Cloud Solutions CTR046098 - Amendment (Ordinance S-52738) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to authorize additional
expenditures under Contract 151147 with Carahsoft Technology Corp. to purchase
cloud-based information technology solutions for Citywide departments. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures will not exceed $549,000.

Summary
The Contract provides cloud-based and information technology solutions, including
Software as a Service, Infrastructure as a Service, Platform as a Service, and
professional services for implementation, configuration, training, ongoing support, and
related solutions as allowed under the Cooperative Participating Agreement. The
additional funds will allow the Aviation Department to purchase Salesforce and related
professional services. Salesforce is a Customer Relationship Management system that
manages stakeholder interactions, tracks communications, and streamlines workflows.
By integrating Salesforce, the Aviation Department will have a unified solution that
connects customer and operational data that will allow for better decision making,
improve service delivery, and enhance transparency across all Aviation operations.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
The term of the Contract remains unchanged and expires on October 31, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $549,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate cost of the
Contract will not exceed $17,421,453. Funds are available in the Aviation
Department’s Capital Improvement Project budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Planning, Zoning, Plan Review, and Permitting Application - Contract 151147
(Ordinance S-46102) on October 16, 2019.


· Master Agreement for Cloud Solutions - CTR046098 (formerly Planning, Zoning,
Plan Review, and Permitting Application) - Contract 151147 (Ordinance S-50001)
on June 28, 2023.
· Cloud Solutions CTR046098 - Contract 151147 (Ordinance S-52147) on July 2,
2025.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher, Deputy City Manager Frank
McCune and the Finance and Aviation departments.








Report

Acceptance and Dedication of Easements for Public Utility Purposes (Ordinance
S-52741) - Districts 7 & 8

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements for public utility
purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via
separate recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting and dedicating the property interests below will meet the Planning and
Development Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to
releasing any permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Maricopa County Recording: 20260081063
Date: February 11, 2026
Applicant and Grantor: Elvia Mata Loredo; its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 107 W. Marguerite Avenue
APN: 113-30-052B
File: FN 250125
Council District: 7

Easement (b)
Maricopa County Recording: 20260092654
Date: February 18, 2026
Applicant and Grantor: Sebastian Diaz Trujillo; its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 1021 N. 27th Street
APN: 121-76-041
File: FN 250126
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.





Report

Acceptance of Easements for Drainage Purposes (Ordinance S-52743) - District

Request for the City Council to accept easements for drainage purposes; further
ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via separate
recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Maricopa County Recording: 20260092652
Date: February 18, 2026
Applicant: Ninety-Nine Holdings, LLC; its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 1701 N. 99th Avenue
APN: 102-33-002G
File: FN 250090
Council District: 5

Easement (b)
Maricopa County Recording: 20260102223
Date: February 23, 2026
Applicant: 101 Logistics Owner, LLC; its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: south of southeast corner of State Route 101 and W. Indian School Road
APN: 102-25-976
File: FN 250037
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.





Report

Part- Time Television Engineering Services Contract - IFB-26-0141 Request for
Award (Ordinance S-52770) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Engineering and Recording Inc dba EAR Professional Audio Video, to provide part-
time television engineering services for the Communications Office and the Budget
and Research Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $325,000.

Summary
This contract will provide services to operate and maintain PHXTV's broadcast and
productions systems, deliver technical support and preventative maintenance for all
software and equipment, maintain and operate on-site servers and ensure compliance
with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations. These services are
essential to ensure reliable operations, support high quality video content, enable
emergency repairs and provide technical assistance and research to meet the City's
video production needs.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10. One vendor submitted a bid deemed to be responsive
to posted specifications and responsible to provide the required goods and services.
Following an evaluation based on price, the procurement officer recommends award to
the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Engineering and Recording Inc dba EAR Professional Audio Video.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about May 16, 2026, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $325,000. Funding is available in the
Communications Office and Budget and Research Department operating budgets.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher, Deputy City Manager Amber
Williamson, the Communications Office and the Budget and Research Department.








Report

Amendments to the City's Combined Classification and Pay Ordinance (S-51144)
in Accordance with Human Resources Committee's 2026-003 and 2026-008
Recommendations (Ordinance S-52767) - Citywide

Human Resources Committee (HRC) 2026-003 recommends the following:

Establish the classification of Network Specialist, Job Code: 09720, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 056 ($45,926.40 - $100,235.20), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Non-Exempt effective
the first pay period beginning date following Council approval.

Establish the classification of Unified Communications Specialist, Job Code: 09740,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 056 ($45,926.40 - $100,235.20), Labor Unit Code:
007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Non-
Exempt effective the first pay period beginning date following Council approval.

Establish the classification of NOC Analyst, Job Code: 09760, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 056 ($45,926.40 - $100,235.20), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Non-Exempt effective
the first pay period beginning date following Council approval.

HRC 2026-008 recommends the following:

Regrade the assignment to the classification of Fire Prevention Specialist II*IND/PR,
Job Code: 61101, Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 357 ($47,028.80 - $102,668.80),
Labor Unit Code: 003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA
Status: Non-Exempt to Grade/Range: 359 ($49,379.20 - $107,806.40) effective the
first pay period beginning date following Council approval.

Regrade the classification of Fire Prevention Specialist II, Job Code: 61100, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 353 ($42,660.80 - $93,121.60), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Non-Exempt to
Grade/Range: 355 ($44,803.20 - $97,780.80) effective the first pay period beginning
date following Council approval.




Regrade the classification of Fire Prevention Specialist I, Job Code: 61110, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 347 ($36,857.60 - $80,454.40), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Non-Exempt to
Grade/Range: 349 ($38,688.00 - $84,468.80) effective the first pay period beginning
date following Council approval.

Summary
The job classification adjustments listed above were identified to address internal
alignment and operational needs. These recommendations were developed in
consultation with the affected departments, Budget and Research, and applicable
labor groups. Staff requests approval of the proposed adjustments.

Financial Impact
The estimated initial cost for this action is $36,832.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On February 26, 2026, Human Resources Committee 2026-003 reviewed and
recommended establishing Job Codes 09720, 09740, and 09760 for approval effective
the first pay period beginning date following Council approval.

On March 16, 2026, Human Resources Committee 2026-008 reviewed and
recommended regrading Job Codes 61101, 61100, and 61110 for approval effective
the first pay period beginning date following Council approval.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Human
Resources Department.








Report

Authorization to Enter Into Contract with Father Matters, Inc. for Youth Crime
Prevention Services (Ordinance S-52736) - Districts 4, 5, 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contract with
Father Matters, Inc. to provide Youth Crime Prevention Services for the City of
Phoenix. The contract will begin on or about May 1, 2026, and end on June 30, 2029,
for a three-year and two-month term with no options to extend. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The value of the
contract is $500,000 annually, not to exceed $1.5 million in total. Funding is available
in the Human Services Department's Operating budget.

Summary
The City of Phoenix seeks to fund a youth crime prevention program to reduce juvenile
crime in the following Phoenix neighborhoods: Maryvale, South Phoenix, Alhambra,
and Central City. The program will engage communities, schools, and families through
holistic programmatic support with emphasis on evidence-based or evidence-informed
service methods that have proven effective through rigorous scientific research or best
available evaluation studies.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Twenty vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An
evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria
with a maximum possible point total of 1,000.

Organizational Capacity and Staffing - 150 points
Program Design and Methodology - 200 points
Community Engagement and Partnerships - 100 points
Program Focus and Rational - 100 points
Program Implementation Plan - 100 points
Evaluation and Logic Model - 150 points
Administrative and Reporting Readiness - 100 points
Geographical Provision Ability - 50 points



Budget and Fiscal Responsibility - 50 points

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:

Father Matters, Inc. - 880 points

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about May 1, 2026, for a three-year, two-month term with
no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The total contract value will not exceed $1.5 million. Funding is available in the Human
Services Department's Operating budget.

Location
Council Districts: 4, 5, 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.








Report

Retroactive Authorization to Apply for, Accept and Disburse Grant Funding from
the Garcia Family Foundation and Enter into Agreement (Ordinance S-52757) -
District 7, 8 and Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to retroactively apply for,
accept, and enter into an agreement with the Garcia Family Foundation (GFF) for a
grant in support of interventions (e.g., move in assistance, flex funds) provided in
connection with the 2026 Rapid Exit Pilot at three shelters in the City of Phoenix. The
grant amount will not exceed $130,000. No matching funds are required. Further
request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to
disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
Funding from this grant will be used for interventions (e.g., move in assistance, flex
funds) provided in connection with the 2026 Rapid Exit Pilot at three shelters in the
rapidly transition from shelter to permanent housing solutions.

Contract Term
The grant term will begin March 1, 2026, and end March 1, 2027.

Financial Impact
No matching funds are required.

Location
230 S. 12th Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85007
11 S. 71st Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85043
2739 E. Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85034
Council Districts: 7, 8, and Citywide

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Office of
Homeless Solutions.







Report

NFL FLAG Youth League Equipment and Apparel - PKS-RFA-26-0023 - Request
for Award (Ordinance S-52731) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
RCX Sports Leagues LLC to provide NFL FLAG Youth League Equipment and Apparel
for the Parks and Recreation Department. Request the City Council to grant an
exception to Phoenix City Code Section 42-18 to authorize inclusion in the documents
pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions
that otherwise would be prohibited. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed
$300,000.

Summary
This contract will provide NFL FLAG youth league equipment and apparel for officially
licensed programs hosted by the Parks and Recreation Department. RCX Sports
Leagues LLC provides full-service youth sports equipment and apparel for boys and
girls ages 5 to17. These services are essential as they directly support youth sports
programming, community engagement and the City's commitment to providing safe,
inclusive recreational opportunities for youth. NFL FLAG is a nationally recognized
sports initiative that promotes civic engagement.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as the result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstance without Competition Sole Source. NFL FLAG, operated by RCX
Sports Leagues LLC, is the only flag football program officially licensed by the National
Football League (NFL) and serves as the sole source provider of authentic NFL FLAG
equipment and apparel.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about May 1, 2026, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $300,000. Funding is through participant



fees. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Cynthia Aguilar and the Parks and
Recreation Department.








Report

Event Equipment Rental Services - PKS-IFB-26-0175 (Ordinance S-52735) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Event Rents Phoenix LLC, Luna Brinca Rentals LLC, Bright Event Rentals LLC, and
PRO EM Operations LLC to provide event equipment rental services for the Parks and
Recreation and Aviation departments. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed
$755,000.

Summary
These contracts provide event equipment and rental services for large-scale City-
sponsored events and numerous community and special events hosted by the Parks
and Recreation and Aviation departments. Equipment rentals may include canopies,
chairs, tables, lighting, generators, temporary barricades, and Americans with
Disabilities Act required platforms and ramps. Services may include transportation, set-
up, and tear-down of equipment. The contracts are critical to the City as they ensure
the safe, efficient, and professional execution of event equipment rental services that
enhance community engagement, cultural programming, and public enjoyment.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative
Regulation 3.10. Four vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted
specifications and responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following
an evaluation based on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the
following vendors:
Event Rents Phoenix, LLC
Luna Brinca Rentals, LLC
Bright Event Rentals, LLC
PRO EM Operations, LLC

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about May 1, 2026, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.




Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $755,000. Funding is available in
the Parks and Recreation and Aviation departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Cynthia Aguilar and Frank McCune
and the Parks and Recreation and Aviation departments.








Report

Lifeguard Uniforms Contract - PKS-IFB-26-0193 Request for Award (Ordinance S
-52755) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Original Watermen to provide lifeguard uniforms for the Parks and Recreation
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $500,000.

Summary
Lifeguard uniforms are utilized by Parks and Recreation Department staff in aquatics
programs. The department hires approximately 650 employees during the summer
months, and these uniforms are needed for staff at the public pools throughout the
City.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Three vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends an award to the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Original Watermen

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 1, 2026, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $500,000.

Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's Operating budget.





Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Cynthia Aguilar and the Parks and
Recreation Department.








Report

Apply for Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management Invasive Plant
Grant (Ordinance S-52768) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, and if awarded,
enter into an agreement for the disbursement of funding from the Arizona Department
of Forestry and Fire Management Invasive Plant Grant to target and treat areas
infested with invasive plants in the Parks and Recreation Department. Further request
to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds
related to this item. The total grant funds received will not exceed $200,000. Projects
require matching funds between 10 and 30 percent.

Summary
The City of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department is seeking funding to implement
targeted treatment and long-term management of non-native invasive plant species
that threaten the ecological integrity of our desert parks and preserves. Invasive plants
disrupt watershed function by increasing water consumption, accelerating erosion, and
reducing groundwater recharge in a region already facing significant water scarcity.
The most challenging invasive plants in our preserve currently are Stinknet
(Oncosiphon pilulifer), Buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris), Fountaingrass (Cenchrus
setaceus) and Cheeseweed (Malva parviflora), to name a few.

Invasive plants degrade wildlife habitat by displacing the native vegetation
communities that support desert pollinators, migratory birds, and other sensitive
species. Their aggressive growth patterns allow them to compete with native plants for
light, nutrients, and water, leading to a loss of biodiversity and diminished ecological
resilience. Without intervention, these changes will continue to compromise the health
of our natural areas, reduce recreational and educational value for residents, and
increase long-term management costs.

Grant funding will enable the City to expand early detection and rapid response efforts,
implement treatment strategies, and restore native plant communities across priority
sites. This investment will protect critical habitat and preserve the ecological character
of Phoenix’s parks and preserves for future generations. Multiple locations within the
Natural Resources Division have identified specific priority areas of concern:




Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Area
· Central Avenue Gateway Trailhead.
· 7th Avenue Trailhead.

Papago Park
· West Park.

Phoenix Mountains Preserve
· North Mountain Visitor Center.
· Piestewa Peak.
· Dreamy Draw.

Phoenix Sonoran Preserve
· Apache Wash Trailhead.
· Desert Hills Trailhead.

Financial Impact
A project-based 10 to 30 percent funding match is required. The match will be provided
via in-kind volunteer hours. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Cynthia Aguilar and the Parks and
Recreation Department.








Report

(CONTINUED FROM MARCH 25, 2026) - Amend Ordinance to Include Specific
Agreement Terms for the Resource Innovation Campus Development (Ordinance
S-52698) - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to amend
Ordinance S-51535 to incorporate finalized agreement terms for the Development
Agreement, Ground Lease, and Feedstock Agreement related to the development of
the Resource Innovation Campus (RIC) resulting from participation in the Reinventing
Cities Program.

Summary
On December 18, 2024, City Council authorized the City Manager, or the City
Manager's designee, to enter into a development agreement and execute any related
agreements, instruments, or documents necessary with Krause Interior Architecture,
Inc., and its affiliates or subsidiaries, for development of the RIC resulting from
participation in the Reinventing Cities Program. Council further authorized the City
Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse funds associated with the
ordinance.

Ordinance S-51535 initially established a two-phased approach with a five-year
contract term beginning on or about December 18, 2024, with no options to extend.
Phase II contemplated amending the term up to a maximum of 99 years.

Since the original City Council approval, environmental assessments, land appraisals,
fair market lease rate assessments, and some parcel preparation have been
completed. The Developer has provided documentation demonstrating financial
capacity to complete construction. As a result, the previously contemplated pilot
demonstrations and two-phased structure are no longer necessary.

This request amends the Ordinance to incorporate finalized agreement terms,
eliminate the two-phase structure, and establish the following key provisions:

Ground Lease
· Approximately 22 acres located on the eastern portion of the southeast corner of
35th Avenue and Elwood Street will be leased for a term of 99 years.


· “Net Rent” shall equal one-fourth (1/4) of the Appraised Rental Value (determined
annually) for the applicable phase(s), less any quarterly Diversion Deduction offset
credit.
· “Diversion Deduction” shall mean, on a quarterly basis, amounts owed by the City
to the Tenant pursuant to the Feedstock Agreement, as reflected on the Tenant’s
invoice, up to the Appraised Rental Value for that quarter. Offset credits will only be
earned based on the applicable quarterly Diversion Deduction. The credit is an
offset of funds that would have been otherwise directed toward landfill operations
costs by the Public Works Department and is not an additional payment.

Tenant shall have the right to use the Premises for circular economy solution
developments, including but not limited to:
· Municipal solid waste and organic waste;
· Difficult-to-recycle plastics (#3, #4, #6, #7);
· Lithium-ion batteries and electronic waste;
· Textile waste;
· Construction and demolition waste; and
· Industrial, research, educational, office, and retail uses associated with circular
economy activities.

The City may consider additional uses aligned with the 2050 Sustainability Goals,
Phoenix Climate Action Plan, Rio Reimagined Initiative, and other environmental
sustainability initiatives upon written request by Tenant.

The Campus Headquarters Building shall obtain one Petal Certification under the
Living Building Challenge. All other permanent buildings shall, as applicable, obtain
LEED v4.1 Building Design and Construction Certification and demonstrate
compliance with energy efficiency, low-carbon energy, life cycle assessment, and
sustainable materials management principles consistent with the C40 Reinventing
Cities Competition requirements.

At least 30 days prior to the effective date of any Sublease, Tenant shall provide
written notice to the Community and Economic Development Director and the Public
Works Director for review and approval.

Development Agreement
The Development Agreement confirms RIC PHX, LLC as the Developer and confirms
that the Developer does not intend to seek reimbursement from the City for Public
Infrastructure Improvements.
Feedstock Agreement


· Term: 50 years following the Commercial Operation Date, with four 10-year renewal
options and one additional nine-year renewal option, unless earlier terminated or
extended as provided.
· RIC PHX, LLC will serve as Operator.

“Feedstock” means waste collected and delivered by the City to the 27th Avenue
Transfer Station from residential customers and not otherwise obligated under existing
agreements, including the WeCare Denali Agreement or the Circular Services
Agreement.

Key provisions include:
· No obligation for Operator to accept, nor for City to supply, Feedstock between the
Effective Date and the Commercial Operation Date.
· After the Commercial Operation Date, City shall maintain availability of Feedstock
not otherwise under contract, and Operator shall accept such Feedstock and
prioritize City-provided material.
· If Operator elects to receive additional Feedstock from other City locations, the
parties shall negotiate in good faith to determine actual transfer costs. Such costs
will reflect the City’s current contracted hauling rate and will be deducted from Post
Collection Operational Costs.
· “Post Collection Operational Costs” means post-collection operational costs
associated with transporting refuse from the 27th Avenue Transfer Station to SR85
landfill, as defined in the Feedstock Agreement. This is affiliated with the "Diversion
Deduction" rent credit and is not an additional payment.

Contract Term
This amendment establishes a 99-year Ground Lease term and a 50-year Feedstock
Agreement term, with renewal options as described above.

Financial Impact
The primary financial impact to the City consists of providing the feedstock, which
consists of municipal solid waste, difficult-to-recycle plastics, and other materials
otherwise destined for landfill. This allows for less solid waste being transported to the
landfill and placed in the landfill, which will save operational costs and prolong the life
of the landfill. Both of these help lower solid waste operational costs over the long term
agreement period.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Economic Development and Housing Subcommittee recommended approval on
November 25, 2024, by a vote of 4-0.



related agreements on December 18, 2024 (Ordinance S-51535).

Location
East of 35th Avenue and Elwood Street.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer, Deputy City
Manager Alan Stephenson and the Community and Economic Development and
Public Works departments.








Report

Authorization to Amend Construction Staging License Agreement with Kitchell
Construction, Inc. (City Contract 162620) for the Use of City-Owned Property
Located at 701 W. Washington Street (Ordinance S-52756) - District 7

Authorization to amend the Construction Staging License (License) with Kitchell
Construction, Inc. (Licensee) to extend the license term for use of City-owned property
located at 701 W. Washington Street to support the Phoenix Police Department (PD)
Crime Laboratory (Crime Lab) Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
Upgrade Project.

Summary
In 2024, City Council authorized the City to enter into a Construction Staging License
with Kitchell Construction, Inc. for approximately 0.8 acres of City-owned property
located at 701 W. Washington Street. The license supports contractor parking and
laydown needs for the Phoenix Police Department Crime Lab HVAC Upgrade Project
(Project #PW26480024). The license included an initial one-year term with two three-
month extensions. Both extensions have now been exercised, extending the current
License through May 31, 2026.

Public Works has updated the project schedule, and the HVAC improvements are now
anticipated to be completed on December 3, 2026. The Licensee has submitted a
written request to extend the staging license to match the revised project timeline. The
amendment ensures the Crime Lab HVAC project can be completed without
disruption. The extension will not impact CEDD’s ongoing efforts to prepare the
surrounding property for a future redevelopment Request for Proposals (RFP). To
support uninterrupted completion of the HVAC project, the City and Licensee have
agreed to modify the License as follows:
· Term: Extend the License term from June 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026.
Allow for one additional three-month extension.
· No modification to the compensation for the license agreement.
· Additional Terms and Conditions: Continue Licensee’s maintenance responsibility
for approximately 1.12 acres of landscaping on City-owned property during the
extended term. Maintain all existing insurance, fencing, and permitting
requirements.



Financial Impact
There is no impact on the General Fund as a result of this action.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On October 16, 2024, City Council approved Ordinance S-51341 authorizing the City
to enter into the Construction Staging License with Kitchell Construction, Inc.

Location
701 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85007
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Community
and Economic Development Department.








Report

Authorization to Amend City Contract 147086, the West Fillmore Redevelopment
and Purchase Agreement with High Street Fillmore, LLC. and High Street
Fillmore Phase 2, LLC, to Modify the Performance Timeline (Ordinance S-52760)
- District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend City Contract
147086, the West Fillmore Redevelopment and Purchase Agreement (Agreement) with
High Street Fillmore, LLC and High Street Fillmore Phase 2, LLC (Developer), to
modify the performance timeline for Phase 2 of the High Street Fillmore project.

Summary
On March 20, 2018, the City entered into the Agreement with High Street Fillmore, LLC
and High Street Fillmore Phase 2, LLC for the sale of multiple City-owned parcels in
downtown Phoenix for a mixed-use project to be developed in multiple phases. Phase
1 was completed in 2022 with 330 residential units, approximately 10,000 square feet
(SF) of retail, and completion of the Taylor Street Paseo (4th Avenue to 6th Avenue).
Three future phases, known as Lot 4, Lot 5 East, and Lot 5 West, are currently in the
design and permitting phases. Phase 2, the subject of this request, will include 330
residential units and an additional approximately 10,000 SF of additional retail. The
Agreement currently requires the Developer to commence construction of Phase 2 by
February 7, 2026. Due to the current state of the financial markets, the Developer has
asked for an additional two years to commence construction on Phase 2. If approved,
this will extend the Phase 2 construction commencement date deadline to February 7,
2028.

The financial return to the City will not be altered by this request. The City will continue
to receive the Developer's annual carry payment of 2.5 percent of the Phase 2
purchase price for the length of the contract term. Upon the sale of the Phase 2 Site,
2.8 acres will return to private ownership, which will generate net new property tax
revenues. The total project is estimated to generate approximately $1.3 million in
construction taxes. All other terms of the Agreement will remain unchanged.

Contract Term
Amendment is for a two-year extension retroactively beginning on February 7, 2026,
and ending on February 7, 2028.




Financial Impact
The financial terms will remain unchanged with this proposed amendment.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action

Location
Two parcels located between 5th and 6th Avenues, south of Fillmore Street Parcel
Numbers: 111-41-184 and 111-41-185
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Community
and Economic Development Department.








Report

Issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Salamanca Square Project),
Series 2026 (Resolution 22369) - District 5

Requests City Council approval for the issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue
Bonds (Salamanca Square Project) Series 2026, to be issued in one or more tax-
exempt and/or taxable series, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$50,000,000.

Summary
Request City Council adoption of a resolution (Attachment A) granting approval the
proceedings under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix,
Arizona (the “Phoenix IDA”) has previously resolved to issue up to $50,000,000 of its
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Salamanca Square Project) Series 2026, in one
or more tax-exempt and/or taxable series (the “Bonds”) for use by UMOM Housing 11,
LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (collectively with its successors, assignees
and designees, the “Borrower”), to finance, and/or refinance, as applicable, all or a
portion of the costs of the acquisition, construction, development, improvement,
equipping and/or operating of a multifamily residential rental housing project (including
improvements and facilities functionally related and subordinate thereto) expected to
be comprised of approximately 192 units of housing (all or a portion of which will be set
aside for occupancy by low- to moderate-income tenants) situated on approximately
5.543 acres of land to be leased to the Borrower by an affiliate of the Authority located
in Phoenix, Arizona (collectively, the “Facility”) and funding any required reserve funds,
paying capitalized interest on the Bonds, if any, and paying fees, expenses, and costs
incurred in connection with the issuance of such Bonds (collectively, the “Project”), all
in accordance with the Act.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Bonds at its meeting held
on March 19, 2026.

Location
The Facility is located at or near 4439 North 39th Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona.
Council District: 5




With the exception of certain housing bonds, the Phoenix IDA can finance projects
located anywhere in Arizona. In addition, the Phoenix IDA may issue bonds to finance
projects outside of Arizona if the out-of-state project provides a benefit within the State.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE

RESOLUTION _____

A RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE
ISSUANCE OF A COMBINED AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $50,000,000 OF MULTIFAMILY
HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (SALAMANCA SQUARE
PROJECT), SERIES 2026 IN ONE OR MORE TAX-EXEMPT
AND/OR TAXABLE SERIES OF THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX,
ARIZONA

_______________



T
WHEREAS, The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona

(the “Authority”), is a nonprofit corporation designated a political subdivision of the State


AF
of Arizona (the “State”) incorporated with the approval of the City of Phoenix, Arizona (the

“City”); and




D
WHEREAS, Title 35, Chapter 5, of the Arizona Revised Statutes, Section 35-701




R
et seq., as amended (the “Act”), authorizes the Authority to issue revenue bonds for the

purposes set forth in the Act, including the making of secured and unsecured loans to

finance or refinance the development, acquisition, construction, improvement, equipping

or operation of a “project” (as defined in the Act) whenever the Board of Directors of the

Authority finds such loans to further advance the interests of the Authority or the public

interest, and to refund outstanding obligations incurred by an enterprise to finance the

costs of a “project” when the Board of Directors of the Authority finds that the refinancing

is in the public interest; and


WHEREAS, UMOM Housing 11, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company


Salamanca Square Project
4923-3960-0726.1
(together with its successors, assignees, and designees, the “Borrower”) now requests

that the Authority (i) issue its Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Salamanca Square

Project), Series 2026 in one or more tax-exempt and/or taxable series (the “Bonds”),

pursuant to a plan of financing in a combined aggregate principal amount of not to exceed

$50,000,000 (the “Bond Loan”), the proceeds of which will be used by the Borrower to

finance and/or refinance, as applicable, all or a portion of the costs of: (a) the acquisition,

construction, development, improvement, equipping and/or operating of a qualified

residential rental facility (including improvements and facilities functionally related and

subordinate thereto), which is expected to be comprised of approximately 192 units (all


T
or a portion of which will be set aside for occupancy by low- to moderate-income tenants)

situated on approximately 5.543 acres of real property generally located at or near 4439


AF
N. 39th Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85019 (collectively, the “Improvements”); (b) funding

any required reserve funds; (c) paying capitalized interest on the Bonds, if any; and (d)

paying fees, expenses and costs incurred in connection with the authorization, issuance



D
and sale of the Bonds (collectively, the “Project”), all in accordance with the Act; and



R
WHEREAS, in furtherance of the purposes of the Act and in the interest of the

Authority and the public thereunder, the Authority proposes to issue the Bonds and loan the

proceeds thereof to the Borrower to finance all or a portion of the costs of the Project; and


WHEREAS, the Authority, by Resolution 2026-04, duly adopted by the Board of

Directors of the Authority at a lawful meeting called and held on March 19, 2026 granted

approval of the issuance and assignment of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount

not to exceed $50,000,000; and




Salamanca Square Project 2 Resolution No. ______
WHEREAS, Section 35-721(B) of the Act provides that the proceedings of the

Authority under which the Bonds are to be issued require the approval of the Council of

the City; and


WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Code requires that an “applicable elected

representative” (as that term is defined in the Code) approve the issuance of the Bonds

and the plan of finance for the Project following a public hearing, which public hearing

was held by the Authority on March 27, 2026; and


WHEREAS, information regarding the Project to be financed with the proceeds of


T
the Bonds has been presented to the Council of the City; and




AF
WHEREAS, it is intended that this Resolution shall constitute approval by the

Council of the City pursuant to Section 35-721(B) of the Act and of the “applicable elected

representative” as defined in Section 147(f) of the Code with respect to the Bonds.




D
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF



R
PHOENIX, ARIZONA as follows:


SECTION 1. The proceedings of the Authority under which the Bonds are to be

issued are hereby approved.


SECTION 2. The issuance of the Bonds and the plan of finance for the Project are

hereby approved for purposes of Section 147(f) of the Code.


SECTION 3. Notice of Arizona Revised Statutes Section 38-511 is hereby given.

The provisions of that statute are by this reference incorporated herein to the extent of

their applicability to matters contained herein.



Salamanca Square Project 3 Resolution No. ______
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA this 8th day

of April, 2026.




MAYOR


ATTEST:



Denise Archibald, City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney
T
By:
Micah Alexander
Assistant Chief Counsel
AF
DR
REVIEWED BY:



Ed Zuercher, City Manager




Salamanca Square Project 4 Resolution No. ______



Report

Request to Accept the Donation of an Accelerant-Detecting K9 and Handler
Training from Northeast Detector Dog Services (Ordinance S-52764) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager or his designee to retroactively apply for and
accept, if awarded, a donation for an accelerant-detecting K9 and corresponding K9
handler training from the Northeast Detector Dog Services with funding from
International Fire Dogs. Additionally, request authorization for the City Treasurer to
accept and for the City Controller to disburse this donation. If not approved, the
donation will be declined.

Summary
The Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Investigations Unit will mark the retirement of its
accelerant-detecting K9, Sonny, and handler, Fire Investigator Robby Simpson, this
June. This team has played a vital role in advancing arson investigations, assisting
regional automatic aid partners, and promoting community engagement through public
education and outreach. Their efforts have significantly enhanced investigative
capabilities and fostered positive relationships between the department and the
community.

To sustain this specialized capability, the department has applied for the Northeast
Detector Dog Services K9 program, which will supply a fully trained accelerant-
detection K9 and handler training at no cost to the City. The program's total value is
approximately $25,000, making it a cost-neutral opportunity for Phoenix, since both the
handler position and program support are already accounted for in the Fire
Department's existing Fire Investigations budget.

The K9 will be awarded on July 20, 2026, with handler training continuing through
August 12, 2026. Approving this replacement will ensure continuity of essential
investigative services, support regional efforts, and maintain a highly effective
community engagement resource.

Financial Impact
There will be no financial impact on the City. Funds for the position and ongoing K9
maintenance and support are included in the Fire Department's operating budget.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.








Report

Amend Ordinance S-52279 for FFY 2025 Homeland Security Grant Program
Funds (Ordinance S-52765) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Ordinance S-52279,
granting an exception to the indemnity and assumption of liability provision of Phoenix
City Code Section § 42-18, to allow for mutual indemnification pursuant to Phoenix
City Code Section § 42-20 for public entities.

Summary
On September 17, 2025, the Phoenix City Council approved Ordinance S-52279 to
apply for, and if awarded, accept grant funds from the Department of Homeland
Security through the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to enhance regional
authorities ability to prepare for, prevent, and respond to terrorist attacks and other
disasters; and further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The subrecipient agreements
from the Arizona Department of Homeland Security include language regarding mutual
indemnification. This ordinance would authorize the City Manager to allow
indemnification provisions in any subrecipient agreements that would otherwise be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code § 42-18.

Contract Term
The grant period of performance remains unchanged.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-52279 was previously approved at the September 17, 2025, City Council
meeting.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police and Fire
departments.








Report

Amend Ordinance S-50867 for FFY 2024 Homeland Security Grant Program
Funds (Ordinance S-52766) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Ordinance S-50867,
granting an exception to the indemnity and assumption of liability provision of Phoenix
City Code Section § 42-18, to allow for mutual indemnification pursuant to Phoenix
City Code Section § 42-20 for public entities.

Summary
On May 15, 2024, the Phoenix City Council approved Ordinance S-50867 to apply for,
and if awarded, accept grant funds from the Department of Homeland Security through
the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to enhance regional authorities ability to
prepare for, prevent, and respond to terrorist attacks and other disasters; and further
request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The subrecipient agreements from the Arizona
Department of Homeland Security include language regarding mutual indemnification.
This ordinance would authorize the City Manager to allow indemnification provisions in
any subrecipient agreements that would otherwise be prohibited by Phoenix City Code
§ 42-18.

Contract Term
The grant period of performance remains unchanged.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-50867 was previously approved at the May 15, 2024, City Council
meeting.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police and Fire
departments.








Report

Amend Ordinance S-51855 for Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness
Grant Funds (Ordinance S-52769) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Ordinance S-51855,
granting an exception to the indemnity and assumption of liability provision of Phoenix
City Code Section § 42-18, to allow for mutual indemnification pursuant to Phoenix
City Code Section § 42-20 for public entities.

Summary
On April 23, 2025, the Phoenix City Council approved Ordinance S-51855 to apply for,
and if awarded, accept grant funds from the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality to fund Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness projects; and further
request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The subrecipient agreements from the Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality include language regarding mutual
indemnification. This ordinance would authorize the City Manager to allow
indemnification provisions in any subrecipient agreements that would otherwise be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code § 42-18.

Contract Term
The grant period of performance remains unchanged.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-51855 was previously approved at the April 23, 2025, City Council
meeting.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.








Report

Authorization to Amend Lease Agreement 141438 for Real Property Located at
425 E. Buckeye Road from LRF3 PHX Buckeye Rd LLC (Ordinance S-52734) -
District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Lease Agreement
141438 with LRF3 PHX Buckeye Rd LLC at 425 E. Buckeye Road to extend the term
for five years, with two additional five-year automatic renewals. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Additionally, request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix Code
§ 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix Code § 42-18, which is a necessary condition of the tenancy
agreement.

Summary
The Police Department currently leases approximately 43,200 square feet of industrial
warehouse space for the purpose of parking special operations vehicles, storage of
equipment for the search and recovery dive team and information technology support
hardware and other department activities. The Department desires to continue
operating at this location. The current lease expires August 31, 2026, and will be
extended for five years beginning September 1, 2026, through August 31, 2031, with
two additional five-year renewals. Base rent during the initial year will be $54,000 per
month, plus applicable taxes, which is within the range of market rents as determined
by the Real Estate Division. The rent will increase by three and a half percent per year,
thereafter.

Contract Term
The lease term will be for five years, beginning September 1, 2026, and ending August
31, 2031, with two additional five-year automatic renewals.

Financial Impact
The lease allows for abatement of rent during the first four months of the initial term
beginning September 1, 2026, therefore rent for the initial year is $432,000, plus
applicable taxes, beginning September 1, 2026. Rent will increase three and a half



percent per year thereafter.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· City Council Approved Lease Agreement 141438 (Ordinance S-41691) on May 27,
2015.

Location
425 E. Buckeye Road
Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 112-33-059J, 112-33-059K, 112-33-970A
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police and Finance
departments.








Report

Qualtrax Maintenance and Support - RFA 24-0237 - Amendment (Ordinance S-
52739) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 160639 with Qualtrax, Inc. for the purchase of Qualtrax
Maintenance and Support for the Police Department. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures
will not exceed $28,000.

Summary
This contract will provide the Laboratory Services Bureau with annual software
licenses and support to maintain the laboratory's policies, procedures and forms that
are comprised within the controlled management system, as required by the City's
ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for the Police Department. The software allows the
laboratory to control approximately 1,000 management system documents, track
quality assurance activities and document training and testing. The additional funds
will allow the Department to acquire additional software licenses.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on May 1, 2029, with three one-year
options to extend.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $28,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $115,940. Funds are available in the Police Department’s
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Qualtrax Maintenance and Support Contract 160639 (Ordinance S-50834) on May
1, 2024.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Fixed Wing Pilot Training Contract - RFQu-26-0124 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-52742) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Thrust Flight, LLC to provide Fixed Wing Pilot Training for the Phoenix Police
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $285,000.

Summary
The Phoenix Police Department's Air Support Unit requires new pilots receive Fixed
Wing pilot training according to the requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) under the CFR 14, Part 141. This contract will provide officers of the Air Support
Unit with the training, education and experience necessary to obtain relevant pilot
certifications. The program ensures that Officer Pilots receive Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) Part 141-compliant training using technologically advanced
aircraft, structured course outlines and standardized check rides conducted by FAA-
authorized examiners. By delivering consistent, high-quality instruction and
maintaining strict safety and regulatory standards, this initiative enhances operational
readiness and supports safe, efficient airborne law enforcement. Ultimately, these
capabilities enable officers to better serve and protect the citizens of Phoenix through
reliable aerial support.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL).

Two offerors submitted qualifications and were deemed to be responsive and
responsible. The Procurement Officer evaluated those offers as a pass or fail based
upon the following minimum qualifications:
· Company Qualifications and Certifications
· Company Relevant Experience
· Compliance with Scope of Work Requirements

The Procurement Officer recommends award to the following offeror:
· Thrust Flight, LLC



Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 1, 2026, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $285,000. Funding is available in the
Police Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Amend Ordinance S-49626 for Federal Fiscal Year 2023 Homeland Security Grant
Program Funds (Ordinance S-52750) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Ordinance S-49626,
granting an exception to the indemnity and assumption of liability provision of Phoenix
City Code Section §42-18, to allow for mutual indemnification pursuant to Phoenix City
Code Section §42-20 for public entities.
Summary
On April 19, 2023, the Phoenix City Council approved Ordinance S-49626 to apply for,
and if awarded, accept grant funds from the Department of Homeland Security through
the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to enhance regional authorities ability to
prepare for, prevent, and respond to terrorist attacks and other disasters; and further
request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The subrecipient agreements from the Arizona
Department of Homeland Security include language regarding mutual indemnification.
This ordinance would authorize the City Manager to allow indemnification provisions in
any subrecipient agreements that would otherwise be prohibited by Phoenix City Code
§42-18.

Contract Term
The grant period of performance remains unchanged.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· Ordinance S-49626 was previously approved at the April 19, 2023, City Council
meeting.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police and Fire
departments.








Report

Authorization to Accept Reallocated Federal Fiscal Year 2022 Homeland Security
Grant Funds (Ordinance S-52751) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the Police
Department to enter into an agreement with the Arizona Department of Homeland
Security to accept reallocated funds, not to exceed $150,000, from the Homeland
Security Grant Program's Federal Fiscal Year 2022 grant funds. Additionally, request
inclusion of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions in the documents
pertaining to this transaction that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code
42-18. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City
Controller to disburse funds related to this request.

Summary
The Arizona Department of Homeland Security (AZDOHS) administers several federal
grant programs that provide funding to the Phoenix Police and Fire departments.
These grants are designed to provide essential resources for bolstering terrorism
preparedness, multi-agency coordination (with local law enforcement, fire, public
health and emergency management agencies), equipment modernization, training
programs, and large-scale emergency readiness. These investments are targeted
toward safeguarding high-threat areas and enhancing overall community resilience.
The Phoenix Police and Fire departments have received funding through this grant
program for several years. The major AZDOHS grant programs that are funded to the
Phoenix Police and Fire departments are as follows:

State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) - fills high-priority preparedness
gaps identified through threat and hazard assessments. Grant funding is utilized to
support planning, organization, equipment procurement, training, and exercise
programs to prevent, protect, respond to, and recover from terrorism and catastrophic
events.

Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) - funds the unique needs of high-threat, high-
density urban areas. Grant funding is utilized to build sustainable capabilities in the
Phoenix metro area for planning, coordination, equipment, training, and exercises to
address terrorism-related risks.




Contract Term
The grant period of performance is February 2, 2026, to July 31, 2027.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· Ordinance S-48794 was adopted by City Council at the June 15, 2022, meeting.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police and Fire
departments.








Report

Aviation Financial Advisory Services Contract - Request for Award (Ordinance S-
52730) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a contract with
Frasca & Associates, LLC (Frasca) to provide financial advisory services to the
Aviation Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total cost of the contract will not exceed $1.8 million
over the five-year term of the contract.

Summary
The contract will allow the Aviation Department to receive financial and business-
related consulting services, including long-term financial planning and Capital
Improvement Program reviews, assistance with bond issuance, and bond-rating
agency advice. Additional financial-related assistance will include revenue and
expenditure forecasts, rates, charges, and lease reviews, passenger and facility
charges (PFC), and customer facility charges (CFC) support. The consulting services
are crucial to the Aviation Department's ability to issue bonds, fund the capital
improvement program, maintain Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport's credit
rating, and pursue its business objectives.

Procurement Information
Four firms were selected from the current City of Phoenix Financial Advisory Services
Qualified Vendors List for further evaluation. Each firm offers infrastructure finance
experience with various specialties, including airports. The proposals from the selected
qualified firms were evaluated by a three-member evaluation panel on their
qualifications to provide financial advisory services to the Aviation Department.

The scoring of the four firms was as follows:
· Frasca & Associates, LLC - 15 points
· PFM Financial Advisors, LLC - 13 points
· Hilltop Securities, Inc. - 11 points
· Columbia Capital Management, LLC - 4 points

Frasca was selected based on the firm's extensive experience with large hub airports,



bond issuance, financial modeling and forecasting, and PFC and CFC services.
Frasca is the incumbent financial advisory services provider.

Contract Term
The five-year term of the contract will begin on or about May 1, 2026.

Financial Impact
The cost of the contract will not exceed $1.8 million over the term of the contract.
Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Project budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation and Infrastructure Planning Subcommittee:
• Recommended approval of this item on February 18, 2026, by a vote of 4-0.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road, Phoenix, AZ
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Frank McCune and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 4 Baggage Handling System
Upgrades - Construction Manager at Risk Services Amendment -
AV21000109/AV21000119 (Ordinance S-52749) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 157694 with The Weitz Company, LLC to provide additional Construction
Manager at Risk Services for the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 4
Baggage Handling System Upgrades project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the Agreement as necessary within the City Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and further to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional fee for services included in the
amendment will not exceed $18 million.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to modernize the Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport Terminal 4 (T4) Baggage Handling System (BHS).

The amendment is necessary because the BHS used by American Airlines and the
various common-use systems in T4 are largely obsolete, in poor condition, and
operating on end-of-life controls and technology. The amendment will provide
additional funds to the Agreement. The Amendment to Guaranteed Maximum Price is
necessary for the next phase of construction for the modernization of the T4 American
Airlines BHS.

Contract Term
The term of the Agreement remains unchanged from the issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the Agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the Agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
· The Agreement for construction manager at risk services was approved for an
amount not to exceed $300,000, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
· A first amendment was executed to increase the Agreement by $8.2 million, for a



new total amount not to exceed $8.5 million, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.
· A second amendment was executed to increase the Agreement by $48.1 million, for
a new total amount not to exceed $56.6 million, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.
· A third amendment was executed to increase the Agreement by $26 million, for a
new total amount not to exceed $82.6 million, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.
· This amendment will increase the Agreement by an additional $18 million, for a new
total amount not to exceed $100.6 million, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.

Funding for the amendment is available in the Aviation Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately
review and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to Agreement limits for all rendered Agreement services,
which may extend past the termination of the Agreement.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Construction Manager at Risk Services Agreement 157694 (Ordinance S-49323) on
January 25, 2023.
· Construction Manager at Risk Services Agreement 157694 Amendment (Ordinance
S-50050) on July 3, 2023.
· Construction Manager at Risk Services Agreement 157694 Amendment (Ordinance
S-50915) on May 29, 2024.
· Construction Manager At Risk Services Agreement 157694 Amendment (Ordinance
S-52495) on December 17, 2025.

Location
2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Frank McCune and Amber
Williamson, the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Airfield Lighting Vaults Modernization -
Engineering Services - AV08000090 (Ordinance S-52729) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide engineering services that include
design and possible construction administration and inspection services for the
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Airfield Lighting Vaults Modernization project.
Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary
within the City Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not
exceed $2 million.

Further request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action as
may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design, and construction of the Project. The utility services include
electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable television, and railroads
and other modes of transportation. Further request the City Council to grant an
exception to Phoenix City Code section 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents
pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions
that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of the project is to provide engineering services for the replacement of
constant current regulators and associated electrical infrastructure within the three
airfield lighting vaults at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. This effort will
modernize aging electrical systems in the north, center, and south vaults to ensure
safe and reliable airport operations. The existing equipment, including lighting
regulators, is over 20 years old and has exceeded its useful life. These units are being
phased out by the manufacturer and replacement parts will soon become unavailable,
which will create a significant risk of equipment failure and disruption to aircraft
movement areas. The agreement is critical to enhancing system reliability, improving
safety, and maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements.




Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.'s services include updating electrical systems that
are approximately 20 years old or more, including emergency power systems, power
distribution, branch circuitry, and communication cabling. The scope of work includes
upgrading regular communications from legacy serial port cabling to Cat 6, redesigning
portions of the existing circuitry to meet current National Electrical Code requirements,
improving system layout to streamline maintenance and emergency operations, and
potential building modifications to accommodate for new or added improvements.
Services may also include construction administration and inspection.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603, Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S. section
34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received or the
scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Three firms submitted proposals and
are listed below:

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: RS&H Inc.
Rank 3: Affiliated Engineers, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The cost of the agreement for Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. will not exceed $2
million, including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past
termination of the agreement.

Location
2485 E. Buckeye Road


Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Frank McCune and Amber
Williamson, the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Request Authority to Pay for Reimbursable Expenses Related to Customs
Facility Technology Infrastructure at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
(Ordinance S-52745) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to authorize the Aviation
Department to issue reimbursable expenses under Memorandum of Agreement
162550 (MOA) for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) technology
infrastructure at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total cost of the MOA
will not exceed $344,787 and annual recurring maintenance costs will not exceed
$37,721.

Summary
CBP facilitation services are an essential component of international air service
operations. Under the MOA and as an Airport sponsor, the Aviation Department is
responsible for providing certain technological equipment to support efficient
international passenger processing and for upgrading the equipment and connectivity
on a schedule determined by CBP (approximately every three to five years, as
needed).

Phoenix City Code authorizes the Aviation Director to enter into an agreement with
CBP to provide these technology services. However, City Council authorization is
required to expend funds related to the agreement. Further request to authorize the
Aviation Department to expend funds necessary to complete the upgrades and
ongoing maintenance of the technology equipment.

Contract Term
The term of the MOA will continue until terminated by the parties.

Financial Impact
The Aviation Department will spend not more than $344,787 for life-cycle equipment
replacement and annual recurring maintenance costs that will not exceed $37,721
over the term of the MOA.





Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Frank McCune and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Baggage Handling Controls System Design, Programming, and Integration
Services Contract - RFA 25-025 - Amendment (Ordinance S-52753) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 162667 (Contract) with Brock Solutions US Systems LLC to extend the term
of the Contract through October 31, 2026, or until a new contract is executed. No
additional funds are needed and the City Manager, and his designee, is authorized to
continue using Ordinance S-52339.

Summary
The Contract provides technical support, including design, programming, and
integration services, for the baggage handling system (BHS) architectural controls at
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. The Contract is critical for providing technical
support of the BHS upper and lower control systems; evaluating system services,
applications, and databases for security updates and maintenance; and providing
software and system configurations and modifications.

On February 26, 2024, the Aviation Department issued a Request for Proposal for
Baggage Handling Systems - Operations, Maintenance, Repair, and Controls System
Design, Programming and Integration Services (RFP 24-0156). An extension of the
term of the Contract is necessary to ensure uninterrupted operation of the BHS while
the City continues to address the litigation and appeals processes related to the
solicitation and award of a new contract.

Contract Term
The term of the Contract will expire on July 31, 2026. Upon approval, the Contract
term will be extended through October 31, 2026, or until a new contract is executed,
whichever occurs first.

Financial Impact
The aggregate cost of the Contract will not exceed $940,000 and no additional funds
are requested.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:



· Baggage Handling Controls System Design, Programming, and Integration Services
Contract 162667 - Amendment (Ordinance S-52339) on October 15, 2025.
· Baggage Handling Controls System Design, Programming, and Integration Services
Contract 162667 Request for Award (Ordinance S-51560) on December 18, 2024.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Frank McCune and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Baggage Handling System Operation, Maintenance and Repair Services - RFP 19
-008 - Amendment (Ordinance S-52754) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 149845 (Contract) with Daifuku Services America Corporation to extend the
term of the Contract and to authorize additional expenditures under the Contract.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $700,000.

Summary
The Contract provides operation, maintenance, and repair services for the baggage
handling system at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX), which is critical to
PHX operations to ensure all checked baggage are efficiently and securely processed
and arrive at the airline's designated bag makeup location.

On February 26, 2024, the Aviation Department issued a Request for Proposal for
Baggage Handling Systems - Operations, Maintenance, Repair, and Controls System
Design, Programming and Integration Services (RFP 24-0156). An extension of the
term of the Contract is necessary to ensure uninterrupted operation of the baggage
handling system, while allowing staff to continue to address the litigation and appeals
process related to the solicitation process and award a new contract.

Contract Term
The term of the Contract will expire on July 31, 2026. Upon approval, the Contract
term will be extended through October 31, 2026, or until a new contract begins,
whichever occurs first.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $700,000 in additional funds, the revised total cost of the Contract
will not exceed $21,638,878. Funds are available in the Aviation Department’s
operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Baggage Handling System Operation, Maintenance and Repair Services - Contract



149845 (Ordinance S-45631) on May 15, 2019.
• Baggage Handling System Operation, Maintenance and Repair Services - Contract
149845 - Amendment (Ordinance S-50390) on December 6, 2023.
• Baggage Handling System Operation, Maintenance and Repair Services - Contract
149845 - Amendment (Ordinance S-50997) on June 12, 2024.
• Baggage Handling System Operation, Maintenance and Repair Services - Contract
149845 - Amendment (Ordinance S-51490) on December 4, 2024.
• Baggage Handling System Operation, Maintenance and Repair Services - Contract
149845 - Amendment (Ordinance S-52343) on October 15, 2025.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Frank McCune and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Martin L. Shultz Way Ceremonial Signage - District 8

Request City Council approval to install ceremonial signage to honor Martin L. Shultz.
The ceremonial sign will be installed at the intersection of 4th and McKinley streets (
Attachment A).

Summary
Mr. Shultz devoted his life to shaping the future of Phoenix through decades of
professional service and personal commitment. In his long career with Pinnacle West
Capital Corporation, the parent company of Arizona Public Service (APS), he rose to
Vice President of Government Affairs, helped lay the foundation for the success that
APS and the Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant continue to bring to the utility industry
today.

In the 1970s, Mr. Shultz served as Chief of Staff to three consecutive Phoenix Mayors,
John Driggs, Tim Barrow, and Margaret T. Hance, becoming a trusted voice and
steady guide through pivotal moments in the city’s growth. His influence is still felt
today, as he remains a respected presence at the Office of the Mayor and City Council,
the Arizona State Legislature, and among Arizona’s elected leaders.

As a founding member of Phoenix Community Alliance and Chair of its Board in 2008,
Mr. Shultz helped drive the organization’s earliest efforts to create a vibrant and
thriving downtown. The Arizona Center stands as one of his most significant
achievements. His leadership was instrumental in securing a long-term lease
agreement with APS for the project’s first building-an action that gave the developer
the financial strength needed to bring the Arizona Center to life. Nearly 40 years later,
the project continues to flourish, a testament to his foresight and tenacity.

Mr. Shultz’s humanitarian contributions have touched countless lives in nearly every
corner of Phoenix. He was a driving force behind the establishment of the original
Human Services Campus, bringing together more than two dozen partner
organizations united by a shared mission to end homelessness. His commitment to
collaborative, compassionate solutions continues to shape services for the city’s most
vulnerable residents.




Throughout his career, he played a leading role in the development of Arizona’s
transportation systems from freeways to light rail, helping to create the modern
infrastructure that supports the region’s growth.

His service extended deeply into nonprofit and community leadership. As a member of
the Legacy Circle, he supported the Southwest Autism Research & Resource Center
for many years. He also served as a member and later Chairman of the Banner Health
Board of Directors, and contributed his leadership to the Arizona State University
Board of Trustees, the Visit Phoenix Board of Directors, and numerous other
organizations.

In 2009, Mr. Shultz was named Valley Leadership’s Man of the Year. His influence on
Valley Leadership itself is profound; he played an instrumental role in establishing a
program that has grown into one of Arizona’s most prestigious leadership institutions,
shaping generations of public and private sector leaders. His dedication as an
educator and his involvement with the Phoenix Suns further demonstrate the breadth
of his service.

The ceremonial signs at 4th and McKinley streets, standing in the shadow of the APS
tower, are fittingly placed to honor a remarkable individual who championed downtown
Phoenix when it mattered most. The ceremonial signs serve as a tribute to a leader
whose vision, integrity and unwavering commitment helped shape the Phoenix we
know today.

Financial Impact
The fabrication, installation and maintenance cost of the ceremonial sign will be funded
by the Mayor's Office.

Location
4th and McKinley streets
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Frank McCune and the Street
Transportation Department.





ATTACHMENT A




MARTIN L. SHULTZ WAY







Report

Street Transportation Department Right-Of-Way General Construction Job Order
Contracting Services - JOC248 (Ordinance S-52733) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate master
agreements with TALIS Construction Corporation, B & F Contracting, Inc., ViaSun
Corporation, and Ames Construction, Inc. to provide Right-of-Way General
Construction Job Order Contracting (JOC) services for the Street Transportation
Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreements
as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for
services will not exceed $160 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Utility services include, but are
not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The JOC contractor's services will be used on an as-needed basis to provide Right-of-
Way General Construction services to include asphalt paving and concrete work,
waterlines, storm drains, retention basins, landscape, streetlights, traffic signals, utility
work, and traffic control in the right-of-way. All work will be performed as required in
accordance with the City of Phoenix standard details, utility company specifications,
Maricopa Association of Governments specifications, plans provided by the City of
Phoenix, and/or as directed by the City Engineer. Additionally, the JOC contractors will
be responsible for fulfilling Small Business Enterprise program requirements.





Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Sixteen firms submitted proposals
and are listed in Attachment A.

Contract Term
The term of each master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $40 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The master agreement values for each of the JOC contractors will not exceed $40
million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services
will not exceed $160 million. The value for each job order agreement performed under
this master agreement will be up to $4 million each. In no event will any job order
agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to increase the limit.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department’s Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Frank McCune and Amber Williamson,
the Street Transportation Department and the City Engineer.





ATTACHMENT A

Selected Firms:
Rank 1: TALIS Construction Corporation
Rank 2: B & F Contracting, Inc.
Rank 3: ViaSun Corporation
Rank 4: Ames Construction, Inc.

Additional Proposers:
Rank 5: Nesbitt Contracting Co., Inc.
Rank 6: Gonzalez Asphalt, Inc.
Rank 7: Hunter Contracting Co.
Rank 8: DBA Construction, Inc.
Rank 9: DCS Contracting, Inc.
Rank 10: Combs Construction Company, LLC
Rank 11: J. Banicki Construction, Inc.
Rank 12: S & S Paving & Construction, LLC
Rank 13: M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC
Rank 14: Haydon Companies, LLC
Rank 15: Achen-Gardner Construction, L.L.C.
Rank 16: Cactus Transport II LLC







Report

Street Transportation Department Soils and Materials Testing On-Call Services
for Calendar Years 2025-27 Amendment (Ordinance S-52728) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to the
15 agreements with the consultants listed in Attachment A, to provide additional Soils
and Materials Testing On-Call Services for the Street Transportation Department.
Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreements as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional fee for
services included in these amendments will not exceed $37.5 million.

Summary
The purpose of these amendments is to provide continued On-Call Soils and Materials
Testing Services that include, but are not limited to: miscellaneous geotechnical
investigating, materials testing and laboratory services including, but not limited to:
sampling, laboratory and field testing of soil, concrete and asphalt; inspecting asphalt,
concrete, aggregate and pipe plant; analyzing and preparing of reports; forensic
geotechnical and pavement investigating; special inspecting, and other services as
required. The consultants will have appropriate certifications such as Occupational
Safety and Health Administration Trench Safety, Mine Safety Health Administration,
American Concrete Institute, Arizona Technical Institute, Concrete & Cement
Reference Laboratory and American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials. Firms performing tests on Federal Aid projects by the Street Transportation
Department will also need to be included in the list of accredited laboratories by the
Arizona Department of Transportation.

These amendments are necessary because the Street Transportation Department
anticipates higher utilization of these agreements for the remainder of the agreements'
duration which will lead to exceeding the current capacities. These amendments will
provide additional funds to the agreements.

Contract Term
The term of the agreements remains unchanged. Work scope identified and
incorporated in the agreements prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the
parties, and work may extend past the termination of the agreement. No additional



changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
· The initial agreement value for each of the On-Call Soils and Materials Testing
Services consultants was approved for an amount not to exceed $1.5 million,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.
· These amendments will increase each agreement by an additional $2.5 million, for
a new total amount per agreement not to exceed $4 million, including all
subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding for these amendments is available in the Street Transportation Department's
Capital Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will
separately review and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any
amendments. Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered
agreement services, which may extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Street Transportation Department Soils and Materials
Testing On-Call Services Calendar Years 2025-27, Master Agreements 161973
through161988 (Ordinance S-51403) on November 13, 2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Frank McCune and Amber
Williamson, the Street Transportation Department and the City Engineer.





Attachment A


Selected Firms
1. ACS Services, LLC Contract 161973
2. Alpha Geotechnical and Materials, Inc. Contract 161974
3. Alta CMTI, LLC dba Alta Arizona Contract 161975
4. ATEK Engineering Consultants, LLC Contract 161976
5. Atlas Technical Consultants, LLC Contract 161977
6. ATL, Inc. dba CMT Technical Services Contract 161978
7. Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences
Consultants, Inc. Contract 161979
8. Olsson, Inc. Contract 161980
9. ProTex the PT Xperts, LLC Contract 161981
10. Quality Testing, LLC Contract 161982
11. Smith & Annala Engineering Co. Contract 161984
12. Speedie & Associates, LLC Contract 161985
13. Terracon Consultants, Inc. Contract 161986
14. Western Technologies, Inc. Contract 161987
15. WSP USA, Inc. Contract 161988







Report

20th Street: Grand Canal to Highland Avenue - Design-Bid-Build Services -
ST87600136 (Ordinance S-52740) - Districts 4 & 6

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept AJP Electric, Inc., as
the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to enter into an agreement
with AJP Electric, Inc., for Design-Bid-Build Services for the 20th Street: Grand Canal
to Highland Avenue project. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $7,420,889.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to construct bicycle improvements along 20th Street from
Grand Canal to Highland Avenue.

AJP Electric’s services include, but are not limited to: removing and replacing existing
traffic signal poles, mast arms, signal heads, buffered bicycle lanes, narrowing travel
lanes, streetlight upgrades, and intersection improvements at Highland Avenue,
Campbell Avenue, Indian School Road, and Osborn Road.

The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids process set forth in section 34-201
of the Arizona Revised Statutes. One bid was received on February 10, 2026, and was
sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to determine subcontractor
eligibility and contractor responsiveness to Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)
program requirements. A DBE goal has not been established for this project.

The Opinion of Probable Cost and the one lowest responsive, responsible bidder is
listed below:

Opinion of Probable Cost: $8,093,248
AJP Electric, Inc.: $6,746,263

The bid award amount is within the total budget for this project.

The reason for the variance of the Opinion of Probable Cost to the lowest, responsive,
responsible bid is the Engineer's Estimate included a conservative allowance reflecting
federal-aid documentation and coordination requirements and included a higher risk



assumption for coordination and removal complexity. The contractor's bid reflects
current competitive market pricing, favorable production, and market conditions.

Due to volatile material costs and increased labor prices in the construction industry, a
10 percent contingency is being requested to allow for project uncertainties. The initial
contract will be executed at the bid amount of $6,746,263. Use of 10 percent
contingency above the amount will not be allowed without prior written approval of the
Street Transportation Department Director and the City Engineer.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 540 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for AJP Electric, Inc., will not exceed $7,420,889, including all
subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

This project will utilize federal funds and is subject to the requirements of 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 26 and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Funding is
available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
20th Street: Grand Canal to Highland Avenue
Council Districts: 4 and 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Frank McCune and Amber
Williamson, the Street Transportation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements - 2-Step Construction
Manager at Risk Services - ST85100452 (Ordinance S-52747) - Districts 4, 5, & 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. to provide Construction Manager at Risk
Preconstruction and Construction Services for the Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and
Safety Improvements project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments
to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The fee for services will not exceed $10.12 million.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to improve safety at two significant Burlington Northern
and Santa Fe Railway railroad crossings at the intersections of 43rd Avenue and
Camelback Road and 19th Avenue and McDowell Road.

Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. will begin in an agency support role for Construction
Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services. Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. will assume
the risk of delivering the project through a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)
agreement.

Kiewit Infrastructure West Co.’s Preconstruction Services include, but are not limited
to: provide detailed cost estimating and knowledge of marketplace conditions; project
planning and scheduling; alternate systems evaluation and constructability studies;
advise the City on ways to gain efficiencies in project delivery; provide long-lead
procurement studies and initiate procurement of long-lead items; assist in permitting
processes; coordinate with Utilities and assist the design team in identifying utility and
other easements; evaluate existing conditions and identify project constraints; and
participating with the City in a process to establish a Small Business Enterprise (SBE)
goal for the project.

Kiewit Infrastructure West Co.’s initial Construction Services will include preparation of
a GMP proposal provided under the agreement. Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. will be
responsible for construction means and methods related to the project and fulfilling the
SBE program requirements. Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. will be required to solicit



bids from prequalified subcontractors and to perform the work using the City’s
subcontractor selection process. Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. may also compete to
self-perform limited amounts of work.

Kiewit Infrastructure West Co.’s additional Construction Services include, but are not
limited to: construct the Grant Railroad, roadway, traffic, and railroad crossing
improvements; new raised median on McDowell Road; new asphalt pavement,
sidewalk, curb ramps and bus bay; drainage improvements; perform modifications to
existing traffic signals and streetlights; and install new pavement markings and signing.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Four firms submitted proposals
and are listed below:

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Kiewit Infrastructure West Co.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Stacy and Witbeck, Inc.
Rank 3: Ames Construction, Inc.
Rank 4: H&S Rock Dirt Hauling, LLC

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Work
scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may
be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for the contractor will not exceed $10.12 million, including all
subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.



Location
Intersections of 19th Avenue and McDowell Road and 43rd Avenue and Camelback
Road
Council Districts: 4, 5 and 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Frank McCune and Amber
Williamson, the Street Transportation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Water Main Replacement: Pressure Zone 5E - Construction Administration and
Inspection Services - WS85509123 (Ordinance S-52732) - District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Entellus, Inc. to provide Engineering Services that include construction
administration and inspection services for the Water Main Replacement: Pressure
Zone 5E project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The fee for services will not exceed $1,284,728.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide construction administration and inspection
services for the installation of approximately 45,805 lineal feet of ductile iron water
main.

Entellus, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to: provide on-site inspection and
review of work to ensure the quality of the executed work and verify the work is in
accordance with the construction documents and specifications; assist the Contractor
in obtaining permits and approvals for work; provide oversight to ensure protection
against defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractor and its subcontractors;
confirm Contractor’s work progress and quantities of work completed are on schedule
and meet standards; review Contractor cost proposals, submittals, shop drawings,
Request For Information, payment applications, change orders, and other documents



as directed by the City; certify Contractor payment applications; conduct a pre-
construction meeting and other project-related progress meetings; administer the
construction schedule; keep City informed of project status and issues; issue
interpretations and clarifications to the Contractor; conduct substantial and final
completion walks; prepare a punch list of corrective work to be performed by the
Contractor; perform an inspection on all completed repairs; perform re-inspection of
work; perform warranty walk and develop a list of repairs if necessary; track, compile,
and categorize project documentation, including correspondence, meeting minutes,
schedules, photographs, RFIs, submittals, and inspection reports. Entellus will also
prepare and maintain as-builts, and provide public information services.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Seven firms submitted proposals
and are listed below:

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Entellus, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Sunrise Engineering, LLC
Rank 3: Dibble CM, LLC
Rank 4: Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc.
Rank 5: Stanley Consultants, Inc.
Rank 6: Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc.
Rank 7: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Entellus Inc. will not exceed $1,284,728, including all
subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve


funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
Area Bounded By: 52nd Street to 69th Place and St. John Road to Paradise Lane
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer, Deputy City
Manager Amber Williamson, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Alfa Laval Centrifuge Parts and Equipment - RFA 2021-WPP-312 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-52744) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 154205 with Alfa Laval, Inc. for the purchase of Alfa Laval
Centrifuge Parts and Equipment for Water Services Department. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $1,050,000.

Summary
This contract provides essential parts and maintenance services for Alfa Laval
centrifuges currently in operation at the City's Water Production Plants. These
centrifuges play a critical role in the water treatment process by removing debris and
sludge from surface water, ensuring efficient and reliable production of clean water.
Alfa Laval, Inc. supplies original equipment manufacturer (OEM) parts and delivers
specialized services, including troubleshooting and repairs, to maintain optimal
performance and extend the life of the existing centrifuge systems.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2028.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $1,050,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $3,250,000.

Funds are available in the Water Services Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Alfa Laval Centrifuge Parts and Maintenance Contract 154205 (Ordinance S-47471)
on April 21, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.





Report

23rd Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan 2026-2050 - Assessment
Services - WS90200063 (Ordinance S-52746) - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Wilson Engineers, LLC to provide Engineering Services that include an
assessment and master plan development for the 23rd Avenue Wastewater Treatment
Plant (WWTP) Master Plan 2026-2050 project. Further request to authorize execution
of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $2 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to update the draft 23rd Avenue WWTP Master Plan and
Electrical Master Plan through year 2050. The facility assessment will determine the
current condition and remaining useful life of the above and below ground facilities at
the WWTP.

Wilson Engineers, LLC's services include, but are not limited to: facility assessment to
prioritize a list of rehabilitation and/or improvement projects necessary to extend the
useful life of these facilities; evaluate options to increase the 23rd Avenue WWTP
versatility using technologies that can enhance or intensify the existing process;
evaluate future regulatory and end user requirements that could affect existing plant
processes; evaluate overall treatment philosophy and strategy; assess the adequacy
of the required unit processes (both liquid and solid stream); present holistic



alternatives for future capital projects at the facility to maximize the economic benefits
of the system; update electrical master plan; evaluate existing electrical facilities;
evaluate future electrical needs; evaluate APS service alternatives, and evaluate
standby power needs and renewable energy options.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Three firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Wilson Engineers, LLC

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Arcadis U.S., Inc.
Rank 3: Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Wilson Engineers, LLC will not exceed $2 million, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
General Location: 23rd Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road
Council District: 7






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer, Deputy City
Manager Amber Williamson, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.








Report

CEM Moisture Microwave and Analyzers Equipment, Repairs and Maintenance -
RFA 2122-WWT-348 - Amendment (Ordinance S-52748) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 156118 with CEM Corporation for the purchase of
moisture microwave and analyzer equipment, repairs and maintenance for the Water
Services Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $160,000.

Summary
This purpose of this agreement is to provide necessary maintenance, repairs, parts
and consumable items for moisture analyzers at the Water Production and Wastewater
Treatment Plants in the Water Services Department. Moisture analyzers determine the
solids percent of various treatment process samples. Results obtained from the
sample analysis are used to monitor, optimize, and control the solids thickening and de
-watering processes at the plants.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on March 31, 2029.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $160,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $510,000.

Funds are available in the Water Services Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• CEM Moisture Microwave and Analyzers Equipment, Repairs and Maintenance
Contract 156118 (Ordinance S-48458) on April 6, 2022.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.






Report

Valves - IFB 26-0134 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-52752) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Atlantic Pacific Standard, LLC., Fortiline, Inc., Ferguson US Holdings, Inc., George S.
Thomson, Inc., TW Associates, LLC to provide valves for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $15,000,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide valves on an as needed basis.

Atlantic Pacific Standard, LLC., Fortiline, Inc., Ferguson US Holdings, Inc., George S.
Thomson, Inc., TW Associates, LLC services include but are not limited to: the supply
of various new valves, valve parts and accessories, and valve maintenance and repair
services.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Five vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendors:

Selected Bidders:
· Atlantic Pacific Standard, LLC.
· Fortiline, Inc.
· Ferguson US Holdings, Inc.
· George S. Thomson, Inc.
· TW Associates, LLC.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about June 1, 2026, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.



Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts' value will not exceed 15,000,000.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department’s operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Sodium Hypochlorite IFB-26-0155 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52758) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Hill Brothers Chemical Company to provide sodium hypochlorite for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $5,600,000.

Summary
The Water Services Department uses a variety of chemicals to continuously treat
surface water and wastewater to meet federal, state and local regulations. This
contract will provide the ability to purchase sodium hypochlorite on an as needed
basis. The product is used as a disinfectant in the water treatment process.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Three vendors submitted bids and are listed below and two bidders were determined
to be responsive and responsible. Following an evaluation based on price, the
procurement officer recommends award to the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Hill Brothers Chemical Company

Additional Bidders
PVS DX Chemicals Inc.
HASA, Inc

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 15, 2026, for five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $5,600,000.




Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Operating Budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Sodium Bisulfite IFB-26-0156 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52759) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Brenntag Pacific, LLC (a disregarded entity of Brenntag North America LLC) to provide
sodium bisulfite for the Water Services Department. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract
will not exceed $1,150,000.

Summary
The Water Services Department uses a variety of chemicals to continuously treat
surface water and wastewater to meet federal, state and local regulations. This
contract will provide the ability to purchase sodium bisulfite on an as needed basis.
The product is used in the wastewater treatment process for neutralizing disinfectant
products.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Three vendors submitted bids and are listed below and all bids except for one were
determined to be responsive and responsible. Following an evaluation based on price,
the procurement officer recommends award for the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Brenntag Pacific, LLC

Additional Bidders
Univar Solutions USA, LLC
Thatcher Company of Arizona, Inc.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 15, 2026, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.





Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1,150,000.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Operating Budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Silica Dioxide IFB-26-0161 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52761) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contract with
Thatcher Company of Arizona, Inc., to provide silica dioxide for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $925,000.

Summary
The Water Services Department uses a variety of chemicals to continuously treat
surface water and wastewater to meet federal, state and local regulations. This
contract will provide the ability to purchase silica dioxide on an as needed basis. The
product is used as a filtration medium in the water treatment process.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

One vendor submitted a bid and the bid was deemed to be responsive and responsible
to provide the required goods and services. Following a evaluation based on price, the
procurement officer recommends award to the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Thatcher Company of Arizona, Inc.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 15, 2026, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $925,000.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Operating Budget.






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Hydrofluorosilicic Acid 24.5% IFB-26-0165 Request for Award (Ordinance S-
52762) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Pencco, Inc., to provide hydrofluorosilicic acid 24.5 percent for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $3,400,000.

Summary
The Water Services Department uses a variety of chemicals to continuously treat
water and wastewater to meet federal, state and local regulations. This contract will
provide the ability to purchase hydrofluorosilicic acid 24.5 percent on an as needed
basis. The product is used in the water treatment process to ensure the delivery of
safe drinking water.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Two vendors submitted bids and are listed below and one was determined to be
responsive and responsible. Following an evaluation based on price, the procurement
officer recommends award to the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Pencco, Inc.

Additional Bidder
DuBois Chemicals, Inc.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 15, 2026, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $3,400,000.




Funding is available in the Water Services Operating Budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Caustic Soda IFB-26-0207 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52763) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contract with
Univar Solutions USA, LLC, to provide caustic soda for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $35,000,000.

Summary
The Water Services Department uses a variety of chemicals to continuously treat
surface water and wastewater to meet federal, state, and local regulations. This
contract will provide the ability to purchase caustic soda on an as needed basis. The
product is used to raise the pH levels of the water to meet federal regulations.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Three vendors submitted bids and are listed below and one bid was found to be
responsive and responsible. Following an evaluation based on price, the procurement
officer recommends award to the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Univar Solutions USA, LLC

Additional Bidders
Brenntag North America, LLC dba Brenntag Pacific LLC
PVS DX, LLC

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about April 15, 2026, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $35,000,000.




Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating Budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manger Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Abandonment of Easement - ABND 250031 - 3880 West Vineyard Road
(Resolution 22368) - District 8

Abandonment: 250031
Project: 24-82
Applicant: Meritage Homes
Request: To abandon a 3-foot by 609-foot sewer easement, totaling 1,815 square feet.
Date of Decision: August 7, 2025

Location
Generally locate west of 3880 West Vineyard Road
Council District: 8

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges the
public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the city,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

No consideration fee was required as part of this submittal, although filing fees were
paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Remove/Replace Zoning District - Rancho Grande - Annexation 557 -
Approximately 480 Feet West of the Northwest Corner of 67th Avenue and
Baseline Road (Ordinance G-7501) - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by removing the
Maricopa County RU-43 Zoning District and replacing it with the City of Phoenix S-1
Zoning District on a portion of a property at the location described below, which was
annexed into the City of Phoenix on February 18, 2026, by Ordinance S-52611.

Location
Approximately 480 feet west of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Baseline
Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 6748, 6800, 6802, 6830, and 6848 W. Baseline Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX, ARIZONA, PART II, CHAPTER 41, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, BY AMENDING SECTION
601, THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
ANNEXED PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN (RANCHO GRANDE
ANNEXATION, NO. 557) FROM COUNTY RU-43 TO CITY’S S-1
(RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE).

____________



WHEREAS, on February 18, 2026, via Ordinance S-52611, the City of Phoenix

annexed an approximately 18.75-acre property located approximately 480 feet west of

the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Baseline Road, in a portion of Section 36,

Township 1 North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in “Exhibit A” and

incorporated herein by this reference; and,

WHEREAS, as required by A.R.S. § 9-471.L, the city of Phoenix is required to

adopt zoning districts on the subject parcel to permit uses and densities no greater than

those allowed by the prior County zoning district; and,

WHEREAS, immediately prior to annexation the zoning applicable to this territory

was Maricopa County’s RU-43 Zoning District; and




WHEREAS, the City’s S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) Zoning District is

equivalent to Maricopa County's RU-43 Zoning District;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PHOENIX, as follows:

SECTION 1. The approximately 18.75-acre property located approximately 480

feet west of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Baseline Road, in a portion of

Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 1 East, which is described in “Exhibit A” and

depicted in “Exhibit B” has been annexed to the City of Phoenix, and the present corporate

limits of the City have been extended and increased to include such property.

SECTION 2. Pursuant to A.R.S. §9-471(L), the property depicted in Exhibit B is

hereby removed from Maricopa County's RU-43 Zoning District and placed into the City’s

S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) Zoning District. This zoning designation shall take effect

thirty days after this Ordinance is adopted, without further action by the City Council, and

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Ordinance, together with

“Exhibit A” and “Exhibit B” to be filed and recorded in the Records of the Office of the

Maricopa County Recorder, and

SECTION 4. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to modify The

Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification change as

shown in “Exhibit B.”

SECTION 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of

this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any

court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining

portions hereof.




PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of April, 2026.




________________________________
MAYOR




ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kreigh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager




Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

RANCHO GRANDE ANNEXATION

Legal Description

Located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 1
East, Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona.

Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Rancho Grande Uno, according to the plat of record in
the office of the Maricopa County recorder, Arizona in Book 144 of Maps,
Page 12. Being described as follows:

Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 36;

Thence North 90°00’00” West, along the South line of said Southeast
Quarter, a distance of 1,323.87 feet;

Thence departing said South line, North 00°00’00” East, a distance of 55.00
feet to the Southwest Quarter of said Lot 7 and the Point of Beginning;

Thence North 00°49'38" West, along the West line of said Lot 7, a distance
of 967.25 feet to the Northwest corner thereof;

Thence South 89°54'42" East, along the North line of said Lots 7, 8, 9 and
10, a distance of 845.23 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 10;

Thence South 00°50'13" East, along the East line of said Lot 10, a distance
of 965.95 feet to the Southeast corner thereof;

Thence North 90°00’00” West, along the South line of said Lots 10, 9, 8 and
7, a distance of 845.37 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Containing 816,967.26 square feet or 18.75 acres, more or less.







Report

Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1305 (Ordinance G-
7502) - District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1305. This
amendment reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions
previously approved by City Council with a portion of Z-91-99 and the entitlements
are fully vested.

Summary
To rezone parcels located approximately 1,075 feet west of the southwest corner of
27th Drive and Carefree Highway
Application No.: Z-91-99
Zoning: R-3A PCD NBCOD
Owner: Stoneledge Community Association; City of Phoenix; et al.
Acreage: 84.39

Location
Approximately 1,075 feet west of the southwest corner of 27th Drive and Carefree
Highway
Address: 33665 N 29th Ave; et al.
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1305.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is hereby

amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1305, which accompanies and is

annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of April,

2026.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:_________________________


_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager




DI:arm:LF26-0526:04-08-2026







Report

Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1306 (Ordinance G-
7503) - District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1306. This
amendment reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions
previously approved by City Council with a portion of Z-159-01 and the entitlements
are fully vested.

Summary
To rezone a parcel located approximately 1,500 feet northwest of the intersection of
the 27th Avenue alignment and Dove Valley Road.
Application No.: Z-159-01
Zoning: C-2 HGT/WVR PCD NBCOD
Owner: Acero Canyon Crossroads LLC
Acreage: 13.83

Location
Located approximately 1,500 feet northwest of the intersection of the 27th Avenue
alignment and Dove Valley Road.
Address:33500 N North Valley Pkwy
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1306.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1306, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of April,

2026.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:_________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager




DI:arm:LF26-0528:04-08-2026







Report

Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1307 (Ordinance G-7504)
- District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1307. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with Z-91-A-99 and the entitlements are fully vested.

Summary
To rezone a parcel on the northwest corner of 27th Avenue & North Valley Parkway.
Application No.: Z-91-A-99
Zoning: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR PCD NBCOD
Owner: Canyon Crossroads SIG LLC; Cabana North Valley LLC
Acreage: 22.01

Location
Northwest corner of 27th Avenue & North Valley Parkway
Address: 33450 and 33600 N 27th Dr
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1307.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1307, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of April,

2026.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:_________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager




DI:arm:LF26-0530:04-08-2026







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-82-25-5
(Canopy at the Trails PUD) - Northeast Corner of 104th Drive and Indian School
Road (Ordinance G-7506) - District 5

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District), R-4A (Multi-Family Residence - General), C-1
(Neighborhood Retail), and C-2 (Intermediate Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit
Development) to allow single-family attached residential (townhomes).

Summary
Current Zoning: R1-6 (0.07-acres), R-4A (6.52 acres), C-1 (0.17-acres), and C-2 (2.53
acres)
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 9.29
Proposal: Single-family attached residential (townhomes)

Owner: Elevation Living, LLC
Applicant: Michael Buschbacher, Earl & Curley, P.C.
Representative: Taylor Earl, Earl & Curley, P.C.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Information Only: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee was scheduled to
hear this item on August 13, 2025, for information only, however, there was no quorum.
VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this item on February 11,
2026, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-4.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on March 5, 2026, and
recommended approval, per the Maryvale Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Northeast corner of 104th Drive and Indian School Road
Council District: 5
Parcel Address: 4141 N. 104th Drive




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-82-25-5) FROM R1-6 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT), R-4A (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE –
GENERAL), C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL), AND C-2
(INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 9.29-acre site located at the northeast corner

of 104th Drive and Indian School Road in a portion of Section 20, Township 2 North,

Range 1 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from

0.07-acres of “R1-6” (Single-Family Residence District), 6.52 acres of “R-4A” (Multi-

Family Residence – General), 0.17-acres of “C-1” (Neighborhood Retail), and 2.53

acres of “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial) to “PUD” (Planned Unit Development).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Canopy at the Trails PUD reflecting
the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped January 28, 2026, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information to add the following:
1st Submittal: June 6, 2025
2nd Submittal: September 30, 2025
Hearing Draft: January 28, 2026

b. Page 5, D. Development Standards, above the Development Standards
table, add the following sentence: Any non-residential use shall be subject
to the standards of Section 622 (C-1) or Section 623 (C-2) of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, respectively, per Table No. 1.b.

c. Page 5, D. Development Standards, Minimum Dwelling unit density
(unit/gross acre): Revise to “13.35 du/gross acre”.

d. Page 5, D. Development Standards, Minimum Perimeter Building Setbacks,
Not Adjacent to a Public Street, North and South Yard: Update both
standards to 5 feet.

e. Page 7, D. Development Standards, Elevations and Materials: Move to
page 17 in the Design Guidelines section.

f. Page 8, Development Standards, Streetscape Standards, Indian School
Road, Add after the sidewalk width standard: “All street improvements to
Indian School Road shall be reviewed and approved by MCDOT.”

g. Page 8, Development Standards, Streetscape Standards: Add a row titled
“Pedestrian Connectivity” and the following standard: A minimum of one
direct pedestrian connection is required between the site and the
Monterosa cul-de-sac.




h. Page 10, E. Design Guidelines, Section 507 Tab A.II.C.7 – Auto Court
Cluster Guidelines, replace first paragraph with the following language, and
move above the header for Section 507 Tab A.II.C.7 – Auto Court Cluster
Guidelines: Due to the fact that the site has been constructed as per
approved plans and has been issued a Certificate of Occupancy by the City
of Phoenix, the Design Guidelines for this PUD shall be governed by the
existing developments previously approved Site Plan dated May 19, 2023,
Building Elevations dated July 15, 2022 and the Landscape Plans dated
September 26, 2024, and the modifications listed below from Section 507
Tab A.II.C.7 – Auto Court Clusters, unless and until the subject property is
fully redeveloped or otherwise as stated in this PUD.

i. Page 17, E. Design Guidelines, after the third paragraph (regarding the
open space amenities) add the following:

i. Add a new header called "Buildings".

ii. Replace the last sentence in the fourth paragraph with "The following
shall be provided:"

iii. Replace the bulleted list with the one on page 7 (Stipulation No. 1.e).

2. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

3. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of the Glendale Regional Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.

4. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.




PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of April, 2026.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-82-25-5


WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF
THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 1, LOT 2, AND TRACT 'A' OF ELEVATION AT THE TRAILS, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 1660, OF MAPS, PAGE 44, RECORDS OF
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.

AND

THE WESTERLY 25 FEET OF ABANDONED 104TH AVENUE, AS ABANDONED PER
ROAD FILE NO. 2512, LYING ADJACENT TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1, AND
ALSO ALL THAT PORTION ABANDONED OF SAID 104TH AVENUE LYING
BETWEEN THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH LINE
OF LOT 20, VILLA DE PAZ UNIT ONE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN
BOOK 135 OF MAPS, PAGE 22, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
AND ADJACENT TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 20 AND WESTERLY LINE
OF TRACT 185, VILLA DE PAZ UNIT ONE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED
IN BOOK 135 OF MAPS, PAGE 22, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN FAIRWAY VILLAS, RECORDED IN BOOK
799 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-106-25-8 -
Southeast Corner of 16th Street and Portland Street (Ordinance G-7505) - District

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
PSC (Planned Shopping Center) to C-2 (Intermediate Commercial) for a grocery store
with banquet hall.

Summary
Current Zoning: PSC
Proposed Zoning: C-2
Acreage: 14.17
Proposal: Grocery store with banquet hall

Owner: Lufty Family Limited Partnership
Applicant/Representative: Madison Leake, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this item on February
9, 2026, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 11-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on November 6, 2026, and
continued the item to December 3, 2025, by a vote of 8-0. The Planning Commission
heard this item on December 3, 2025, and continued the item to January 8, 2026, by a
vote of 9-0. The Planning Commission heard this item on January 8, 2026, and
continued the item to February 5, 2026, by a vote of 7-0. The Planning Commission
heard this item on February 5, 2026, and continued the item to March 5, 2026, by a
vote of 9-0. The Planning Commission heard this item on March 5, 2026, and
recommended approval, per the Central City Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southeast corner of 16th Street and Portland Street
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 1602 and 1650 E. Roosevelt Street




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-106-25-8) FROM PSC (PLANNED SHOPPING
CENTER) TO C-2 (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 14.17-acre site located at the southeast

corner of 16th Street and Portland Street in a portion of Section 3, Township 1 North,

Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from

“PSC” (Planned Shopping Center) to “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. Upon complete redevelopment or development that increases the cumulative
floor area of all the buildings by more than 20%, from the existing 114,602
square feet depicted on the site plan date stamped August 14, 2025, or new
development of 5,000 square feet or more, the following shall apply to any new
construction:

a. The building frontages facing 16th Street and Roosevelt Street shall use
an allowable frontage type per the standards of Table 1303.2 Transect
T5.

b. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be
achieved by structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant,
shade trees, or a combination thereof.

c. All pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks) shall be shaded by a
structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum
of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

d. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle
surfaces, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

e. A publicly accessible bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be
provided and maintained on site near a primary site entrance for the first
new construction of 5,000 square feet or more. The bicycle repair station
(“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high visibility and
separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The
repair station shall include, but not be limited to:

i. Standard repair tools affixed to the station;

ii. A tire gauge and pump affixed to the based of the station or the
ground;

iii. A bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin
freely while making adjustments to the bike.

f. A minimum of 5% of the required parking spaces shall include EV Ready
infrastructure.




g. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency
Checkup program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

h. Where triggering development is adjacent, the existing detached
sidewalks along Roosevelt Street shall remain and the planters shall be
replenished as follows:

i. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees
planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

ii. Shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of three feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape
area to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent
with a pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

i. Where triggering development is adjacent, the existing detached
sidewalks along 16th Street shall remain and the planters shall be
replenished as follows:

i. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees
planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

ii. Shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of three feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape
area to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent
with a pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

j. Where triggering development is adjacent, the sidewalks along Portland
Street and Patricio Street shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape strip located between
the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

i. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees
planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.




ii. Shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of three feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape
area to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent
with a pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

k. Where triggering development is adjacent, replace unused driveways
with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any broken or out-of-grade
curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and upgrade all off-
site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA guidelines.

l. All streets within and adjacent to the triggering development shall be
constructed with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

m. A minimum of eight bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through
Inverted U and/or artistic racks located near new building entrances and
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in
Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

n. Where triggering development is adjacent, the landscape planters within
the parking lot shall be replenished per the C-2 standards for planting
type, size and quantity, as approved by Planning and Development
Department.

o. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of
basin, and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and
functional turf areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

p. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other
native nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

q. The northbound bus bay and pad on 16th Street south of the existing
driveway shall be retained.

r. A minimum of 50 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the east side
of 16th Street.




2. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

3. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

4. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

5. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of April, 2026.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager

Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-106-25-8

APN 116-15-092B

That part of the S. 1/2, S. 1/2, N. W. 1/4, Section 3, T.1 N., R. 3 E., G. & S. R. B. & M.,
Maricopa County, Arizona described as follows:

From the southwest corner of said S. 1/2, S. 1/2, N. W. 1/4, Section 3 running thence
easterly along the center line of Roosevelt Street a distance of 195.40 feet; running
thence N. 0˚45’ 25” W. for a distance of 30 feet to a point on the southerly line of
Roosevelt Street, the true point of beginning this description; running thence N. 0˚46’
25” W. for a distance of 145 feet; running thence west for a distance of 155.40 feet to a
point in the easterly line of 16th Street; running thence N.11˚28’ 16” E. for a distance of
56.62 feet; running thence N. 0˚46’ 24” W. for a distance of 100 feet; running thence
west for a distance of 12 feet to a point in the east line of 16th Street; running thence N.
0˚46’ 25” W. along the east line of 16th Street; running thence N. 0˚46’ 25” W. along the
east line of 16th Street for a distance of 294.52 feet; running thence N. 44˚35’ 46” E. for
a distance of 4.22 feet; running thence N. 89˚57’ 57” E. along the southerly line of
Portland Street for a distance of 665.74 feet; running thence S. 0˚38’ 39” E. for a
distance of 598.39 feet to a point in the northerly line of Roosevelt Street; running
thence westerly along the northerly line of Roosevelt Street for a distance of 512 feet to
the true point of beginning.

Containing 375,550 square feet or 8.621 acres.

APN 116-15-093B, 1602 E. ROOSEVELT STREET

A portion of the South half of the West half of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest
quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 1 North, Range 3 East of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more
particularly described as follows:

COMMENCING at a City of Phoenix Brass Cap in Handhole at the intersection of 16th
Street and Roosevelt Street marking the West quarter corner of said Section 3 from
which a City of Phoenix Brass Cap at the intersection of 18th Street and Roosevelt
Street marking the Southeast corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter
of said Section 3 bears South 89 degrees 32 minutes 22 seconds East 708.81 feet
along the South line of said Northwest quarter to the East line of the West 708.74 feet of
said Northwest quarter;

THENCE South 89 degrees 32 minutes 22 seconds East 708.81 feet along the South
line of said Northwest quarter along to the East line of West 708.74 feet of said
Northwest quarter;




THENCE North 00 degrees 19 minutes 51 seconds West 30.00 feet along said East line
to the POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE North 00 degrees 19 minutes 51 seconds West 299.27 feet continuing along
said East line to the North line of said South half;

THENCE South 89 degrees 33 minutes 21 seconds East 249.53 feet along said North
line to the West line of the East 30.00 feet of said north half;

THENCE South 00 degrees 12 minutes 04 seconds East 296.34 feet along said West
line to the Northerly right of way line of Roosevelt Street as described in Docket 9122,
Page 581, Maricopa County Records;

THENCE South 45 degrees 07 minutes 47 seconds West 4.22 feet along said Northerly
right of way line to the North line of the South 30.00 feet of said South half;

THENCE North 89 degrees 32 minutes 22 seconds West 245.85 feet along said
Northerly right of way line and the North line of said South 30.00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.

Comprising 1.712 acres or 74,573 square feet more or less, subject to all easements of
record.

APN 116-15-094B, 1602 E. ROOSEVELT STREET

A portion of the North half of the West half of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest
quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 1 North, Range 3 East of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more
particularly described as follows:

COMMMENCING at a City of Phoenix Brass Cap in Handhole at the intersection of 16th
Street and Roosvelt Street marking the West quarter corner of said Section 3 from
which a City of Phoenix Brass Cap at the intersection of 18th Street and Roosevelt
Street marking the Southeast corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter
of said Section 3 bears south 89 degrees 32 minutes 22 seconds East 1316.72 feet,
said described line being the Basis of Bearings for this description;

THENCE South 89 degrees 32 minutes 22 seconds East 708.81 feet along the South
line of said Northwest quarter to the East line of the West 708.74 feet of said Northwest
quarter;

THENCE North 00 degrees 19 minutes 51 seconds West 329.27 feet along said East
line to the South line of North half of the West half of the Southeast quarter of the
Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 3 and the POINT OF
BEGINNING;




THENCE North 00 degrees 19 minutes 51 seconds West 299.27 feet continuing along
said East line to the South line of the North 30.00 feet of said North half;

THENCE South 89 degrees 34 minutes 20 seconds East 247.20 feet along said South
line to the South westerly line of that right of way described in Docket 9122, Page 580,
Maricopa County Records;

THENCE South 44 degrees 53 minutes 12 seconds East 4.27 feet along Southwest line
to the West line of the East 30.00 feet of said North half;
THENCE South 00 degrees 12 minutes 04 seconds East 296.34 feet to the South line
of said North half;

THENCE North 89 degrees 33 minutes 21 seconds West 249.53 feet along said South
line to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Comprising 1.717 acres or 74,776 square feet more or less, subject to all easements of
record.







Report

Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-DSTV-1
-25-2 - Southeast Corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard (Resolution 22367) -
District 2

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designations on 219.22
acres from 216.47 acres of Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre and 2.75 acres
of Commercial / Commerce/Business Park to 8.20 acres of Commercial and 211.02
acres of Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre. This is a companion case to Z-87-E-
03-2 and should be heard first, followed by Z-87-E-03-2.

Summary
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-25-2
Current Designation: Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre (216.47 acres) and
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park (2.75 acres)
Proposed Designation: Commercial (8.20 acres) and Residential 15+ dwelling units
per acre (211.02 acres)
Acreage: 219.22
Proposed Use: Minor General Plan Amendment to facilitate a hotel development and
higher density attached townhouses, condos, or apartments

Owner/Applicant: Jonathan Stelzer, The Plaza Companies
Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Information Only: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this item on
December 2, 2025, for information only.
VPC Action: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this item on February
3, 2026, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 9-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on March 5, 2026, and
recommended approval, per the Desert View Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.





Location
Southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard
Council District: 2
Parcel Addresses: 6475 E. Mayo Boulevard, 18017 N. 64th Street, and various.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2025
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-DSTV-1-
25-2, CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2025 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 22191, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-DSTV-1-25-2. The 219.22

acres site located at the southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard is

designated as 8.20 acres of Commercial and 211.02 acres of Residential 15+ dwelling

units per acre.

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2025 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as

shown below:




PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of April 2026.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney

-2- Resolution

By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager




-3- Resolution


-4- Resolution


ATTACHMENT B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
January 26, 2026

Application: GPA-DSTV-1-25-2

Owner/Applicant: Jonathan Stelzer, The Plaza Companies

Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Location: Southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo
Boulevard

Acreage: 219.22 acres

Current Plan Designation: Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre (216.47
acres)
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park (2.75
acres)

Requested Plan Designation: Commercial (8.20 acres)
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre (211.02
acres)

Reason for Requested Change: Minor General Plan Amendment to facilitate hotel
and higher density attached townhouses, condos, or
apartments

Desert View Village Planning
Committee Meeting Date: February 3, 2026

Staff Recommendation: Approval

FINDINGS:

1) The proposal will facilitate a mix of residential and commercial uses, contributing
to the land use mix in the area.

2) Existing zoning to the south and east of the companion rezoning case boundary
is consistent with the proposed Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
designation.

3) The subject site is appropriate for commercial uses, as the site is at an
intersection of two arterial streets and nearby a freeway interchange.
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-25-2
Page 2


BACKGROUND

The subject site is a 219.22-acre site located at the southeast corner of 64th Street and
Mayo Boulevard. The current General Plan Land Use Map designations on the site are
216.47 acres of Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre and 2.75 acres of
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park. The applicant proposes to change the
designation for the area of the companion rezoning case Z-87-E-03-2, which is 8.20
acres in size, to Commercial and the remaining area, which is 211.02 acres in size, to
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre to be consistent with the existing zoning.

Companion Case Z-87-E-03-2 (Plaza Companies Hospitality PUD) is a request to
rezone 8.20 acres from S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD) (Ranch or Farm Residence,
Approved Commerce Park District, Business Park Option, Planned Community District)
to PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development, Planned Community District) for a Major
Amendment to the Paradise Ridge PCD to allow a hotel.

The proposed commercial use on the PUD site is not consistent with the General Plan
Land Use Map designation of Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre. The zoning to
the south and east of the proposed PUD rezoning area is R-3A, which is inconsistent
with the General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units
per acre. Therefore, a minor General Plan Amendment is required to amend the
General Plan Land Use Map designation for the PUD site and for the sites to the south
and east of the PUD site as the combined area is larger than 10 acres.

SURROUNDING LAND USES

NORTH / WEST
North and west of the subject site, at the northeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo
Boulevard, is a proposed multifamily residential development designated as
Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.

EAST
East of the site is a commercial center, an office complex, a fitness center, and
multifamily residential designated Commercial / Commerce/Business Park.

SOUTH
South of the site is the Reach 11 recreation area designated Parks/Open Space –
Publicly Owned.

WEST
West of the site, across 64th Street, is vacant land designated Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park.




Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-25-2
Page 3




Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department




Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-25-2
Page 4

RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES

• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels
of increased intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.

The proposal for additional residential and commercial uses is appropriate for
this location on two arterial streets and near a freeway, and the proposed PUD
proposes development standards to prevent negative impacts to the adjacent
residential properties.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS

• DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Communities should
consist of a mix of land uses to provide housing, shopping, dining and
recreational options for residents.

The proposal will contribute to the mix of uses in the area by supporting existing
and future higher-density residential and by providing commercial uses.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY

• TREES AND SHADE: DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into
the design of new development and redevelopment projects throughout
Phoenix.

The proposal, as regulated by the PUD Narrative of companion rezoning case Z-
87-E-03-2, includes development standards that require enhanced landscaping
and shade, including detached sidewalks and minimum shade requirements for
sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian pathways, and parking areas. This
will help to provide shade for pedestrians and bicyclists in and around the
community and to mitigate the urban heat island effect by covering hard
surfaces, thus cooling the micro-climate around the vicinity.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY

At the time this staff report was written, staff has received three letters of opposition.
Concerns include traffic, impact to character of adjacent neighborhoods, building height,
signage incompatibility with desert character, and safety.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-25-2. The proposed General Plan Land
Use Map designations allow for commercial and higher-density residential development
at an appropriate location. The proposed Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
designation is consistent with existing zoning to the north, south and east of the

Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-25-2
Page 5

proposed PUD site. The companion rezoning case, Z-87-E-03-2, as stipulated, will
enhance connectivity in the surrounding area and add standards to buffer the proposed
use from the nearby residences.

Writer
Adrian Zambrano
January 26, 2026

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Community Correspondence (5 pages)




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-25-2 ACRES: 219.22 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: DESERT VIEW COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Snell & Wilmer, LLP
EXISTING:
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac ( 216.47 +/- Acres)
Commercial / Commerce / Business Park ( 2.75 +/- Acres)
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E



w
v
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E




64TH ST
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
Proposed Change Area E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
Transportation E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E EParks/Open Space - Publicly Owned E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
Commercial / Residential 15+ du/ac E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
Commercial / Commerce / Business Park E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E




ALLIED WAY
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Commercial ( 8.20 +/- Acres)
Residential 15+ du/ac ( 211.02 +/- Acres)

w
v
64TH ST

Proposed Change Area
Residential 15+ du/ac
Commercial




ALLIED WAY



GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DSTV-1-25-2 ACRES: 219.22 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: DESERT VIEW COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
APPLICANT: Snell & Wilmer, LLP
EXISTING:
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac ( 216.47 +/- Acres)
Commercial / Commerce / Business Park ( 2.75 +/- Acres)



w
v
64TH ST


Proposed Change Area
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Transportation
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Commercial / Residential 15+ du/ac



ALLIED WAY
Commercial / Commerce / Business Park




PROPOSED CHANGE:
Commercial ( 8.20 +/- Acres)
Residential 15+ du/ac ( 211.02 +/- Acres)

w
v
64TH ST

Proposed Change Area
Residential 15+ du/ac
Commercial




ALLIED WAY



From: pensandoval@gmail.com
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: Desert View Village 64th & Mayo
Date: Wednesday, November 26, 2025 11:03:34 AM



CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious     ‌


We oppose the entire rezoning of this area from residential to commercial and
apartments.   The entire corridors along 68th St, Scottsdale Rd to/from Mayo/101, and
now 56th St are being built up into commercial and apartments buildings which will
increase the traffic on streets that are not set up to handle what will be double or triple
number of vehicles all trying to get on the 101 from Scottsdale, 64th, and 56th St. in
addition to bringing the Cardinals training facility within 1 mile radius, the congestion is
already bad, and this will make it worse.
Norma and Praxedis Sandoval
Owners of 17850 N 68th St #1145




From: kbsle@aol.com
To: Griemsmann, Noel; Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: Re: New hotel proposal
Date: Monday, December 1, 2025 3:45:47 PM



CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious     ‌


Hi Noel,
I did receive the notice of the next two meetings, however I will be out of town for the
Dec. 8 Meeting.

After reviewing the latest documents, would you please add the following comments
to your neighborhood summary comments page:

1) As a resident of Paradise Ridge which will be next door to the proposed hotel, I do
not believe this is the right venue for the area with million dollar plus homes. A nice
restaurant would be a much better option for the site especially due to the additional
residences and town homes that are being built adjacent to the site. A hotel is too
transient for a family community. There already is a hotel for Mayo visitors, which is
set back and closer to the hospital, so it is likely this hotel will be filled with event
guests who have no concern of keeping a neighborhood quiet, clean and safe.

2) If the plan for the hotel does get approved, my thoughts for adjustments follow:

-the height is too high for being so close to residents homes. The lighting will be too
high for the neighborhood at night. I suggest reducing the floors to four. I just stayed
at a Hyatt Place in Flagstaff and it had four floors which made it look to fit the area
better. Is anyone considering the water usage for a 6 story hotel?
-The logo on the front top of the building doesn't fit with our desert landscape and
should be more discreet like the ASU building, showing only the ASU letters, not the
full name, and in a silver/white look which is located on the next lot.
-The company colors of the bright orange and green are again to "loud" and vivid for
the desert space of Phoenix. Just as McDonalds does not have yellow arches in
Sedona, these colors should be muted to keep the integrity of the desert landscape.
-The renderings sent did not show any landscaping but I would guess that is in the
plan, and the more the better.
-The hotel should be required to have a set maximum number of adults per room that
matches the beds. To have this become a constant churn of an overcrowded room for
our local events is inappropriate for the residents, and our police department.
-The hotel should have 24/7 security on site for the hotel and parking lot to get ahead
of issues.
-I would expect the pool to be fenced and locked for guests only.

Thank you for the opportunity to express my concerns.


Karen Batenic, Paradise Ridge resident



On Wednesday, November 19, 2025 at 12:05:47 PM MST, Griemsmann, Noel
wrote:



Karen,



Thank you for reaching out and we will add your comments to the summary report to the City for that
first meeting as well as pass them along to the developer team.



On process, the next step is our informational presentation to the Desert View Village Planning
Committee, which is scheduled for December 2nd. After that, we will have a second neighborhood
meeting, date still not firmed up yet. If you received a letter last time, you will get another. If not, please
send me your address and I will make sure you are on our mailing list.



In the interim, please let me know of any other questions. Hope to see you at one of the upcoming
meetings.



Noel J. Griemsmann, AICP ​




Sr Urban Planner

O: 602.382.6824
ngriemsmann@swlaw.com

SNELL
​& WILMER
swlaw.com [us.content.exclaimer.net] [us.content.exclaimer.net]| [us.content.exclaimer.net]LinkedIn [us.content.exclaimer.net]




From: kbsle@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2025 11:29 AM
To: Griemsmann, Noel
Subject: New hotel proposal



[EXTERNAL] kbsle@aol.com



Hi Noel,



We met at the meeting with the Paradise Ridge residents. I didn't have time to fill out the comment card but I
would like to share in writing the points of concern that I mentioned to you for your thoughts and discussions.



With the proposal for the hotel to be so close to Paradise Ridge homes, I do not think that is the best venue for
the area. A high end restaurant on the Mayo facing property would be better suited for the residents in the area to
use. We already have an influx of drunken, rowdy people coming in to town for all of the events in the area ex.
golf outing, etc. and a lower price hotel will attract more.

In addition, the drawings showed a building not considerate of the southwest landscape in architecture or colors
which is important. The height of the building is too high as well. If it was designed as a higher end boutique
hotel, I think it might be received better, or another use for the property.



Also, I haven't received any communication about meetings for residents to express their thoughts in person.
Has that been sent out or will it be coming soon?



Thank you, Karen Batenic




From: Michelle
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: 64 St & Mayo Rezoning for hotel
Date: Monday, December 29, 2025 12:53:23 PM



CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious     ‌


Hi Adrian,
I have attended a meeting that Snell & Wilmer conducted for getting the land rezoned near my
home. I realize that with Mayo Hospital expanding they want to provide short term stays for
patients and families, but this is not the place to do it. That corner backs up to my
neighborhood Paradise Ridge with single family homes. A 7 story hotel with a parking
surrounding it just isn't right. Wouldn't a 2-3 story building be more in line with what
surrounds us? Or have the builder of the the townhomes get to build out all the way to Mayo
Blvd?
Please let me know how I can be updated more about the dates and process of this rezoning?
Thank you,
Michelle Seabrook




ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-25-2
INFORMATION ONLY



Date of VPC Meeting December 2, 2025
Request From Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre,
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park
Request To Commercial,
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Proposal Hotel and higher density attached townhouses,
condos, or apartments
Location Southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard


VPC DISCUSSION:

Agenda Item 3 (GPA-DSTV-1-25-2) and Agenda Item 4 (Z-87-E-03-2) are companion
cases and were heard together.

One member of the public registered to speak on this item.

Applicant Presentation:
Nick Wood, with Snell & Wilmer, LLP, introduced himself and provided an overview of
the site. Mr. Wood discussed the Rawhide Wash and surrounding street improvements.
Mr. Wood explained the request, noting that the PUD limits the uses and allows the
proposed height. Mr. Wood explained the General Plan Amendment request. Mr. Wood
then displayed and discussed the site plan, landscape plan, shade plan, building
elevations, and renderings.

Questions from Committee:
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked if the parking is above ground or below ground. Mr.
Wood responded that it is all surface parking.

Committee Member Gary Kirkilas commended the inclusion of the trail along the
wash. Committee Member Kirkilas asked if the wash would be channelized or kept in its
natural condition. Mr. Wood responded that the wash would be kept in its natural state.
Committee Member Kirkilas asked if the proposal includes green stormwater
infrastructure (GSI). Mr. Wood responded that he could ask the landscape architect if
that could be included in the project.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 222
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-25-2 – Information Only

Chair Steven Bowser stated that the City has guidelines for GSI.

Committee Member Jason Israel asked if the property is within a floodplain. Mr.
Wood displayed an aerial of the site and surrounding area, noting that the entire
surrounding area is within the AO floodplain. Mr. Wood stated that the Rawhide Wash
project would move the property into an A floodplain, which will reduce the potential
flood impacts.

Committee Member Joseph Barto asked if the Hilton brand is committed to the project
or if they are prospective. Mr. Wood responded that they are committed.

Public Comments:
Richard Manski asked what the traffic management plan is for the roads in the area to
minimize the impact for people that live in Paradise Ridge and the surrounding area.

Applicant Response:
Mr. Wood responded that a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been submitted to and
approved by the Street Transportation Department. Mr. Wood stated that the biggest
improvement the development includes would be widening both 64th Street and Mayo
Boulevard. Mr. Wood summarized what the street improvements would include.

Committee Discussion:
Chair Bowser asked for clarification that the street improvements are being built in
accordance with the approved Master Street Plan. Mr. Wood responded affirmatively.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 223
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-25-2



Date of VPC Meeting February 3, 2026
Request From Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre,
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park
Request To Commercial,
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Proposal Hotel and higher density attached townhouses,
condos, or apartments
Location Southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 9-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

Committee Member Rick Nowell joined the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to nine members.

Agenda Item 3 (GPA-DSTV-1-25-2) and Agenda Item 4 (Z-87-E-03-2) are companion
cases and were heard together.

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

Staff Presentation:
Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided an overview of General Plan Amendment case GPA-
DSTV-1-25-2, including the location of the request, the existing General Plan Land Use
Map designation, and surrounding General Plan Land Use Map designations. Mr.
Zambrano noted that the GPA boundary is larger than the companion rezoning case
boundary in order to match the General Plan Land Use Map designations with the
existing zoning in the surrounding area. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff findings and
stated that staff recommends approval. Mr. Zambrano then provided an overview of
Rezoning Case No. Z-87-E-03-2, including the location of the request, surrounding land
uses and zoning, and the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation. Mr.
Zambrano provided background on the Paradise Ridge PCD, the Desert Ridge Kierland
Major Employment Corridor, and the Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan. Mr.
Zambrano summarized the PUD proposal and displayed the site plan, landscape plan,

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 224
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-25-2

elevations, and renderings. Mr. Zambrano stated that the request has received three
letters of opposition and summarized the concerns. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff
findings and stated that staff recommends approval, subject to stipulations. Mr.
Zambrano shared the recommended stipulations and upcoming hearing schedule.

Applicant Presentation:
Nick Wood, with Snell & Wilmer LLP, introduced himself and provided context of
surrounding developments in the area. Mr. Wood noted that the wash on the east side
of the site is approximately 180 feet wide. Mr. Wood discussed the proposed General
Plan Land Use Map designation. Mr. Wood then displayed and discussed the site plan,
landscape plan, tree and shade plan, elevations, and renderings.

Questions from Committee:
Committee Member Richard Carlucci asked what the Mayo Flyover Study Area
Intergovernmental Agreement is and what the $5 million contribution will go towards,
per Stipulation 6. Mr. Wood responded that there was a point in time when Mayo
Boulevard was going to span over the Loop 101 freeway west of Tatum Boulevard,
within Superblock 8, to connect to the south side of the freeway. Mr. Wood stated that
there was a development agreement between the Arizona State Land Department and
the City of Phoenix regarding that flyover. Mr. Wood stated that they think the money
will be used for roadway infrastructure, but they are not certain. Committee Member
Carlucci asked for clarification that this funding contribution is in addition to the required
right-of-way improvements adjacent to the site. Mr. Wood responded affirmatively.

Committee Member George Birchby asked if there have been studies for the need for
hotels in the area. Mr. Wood responded that he does not know but noted that Plaza
Companies builds many hotels and they do their research on market demand. Mr.
Wood added that the proposed hotel would likely not draw away other hotels, noting
that the need for them is exponential.

Committee Member David Kollar asked if there have been any traffic studies done to
analyze the traffic patterns and traffic congestion, noting that there are multifamily
residential developments proposed to the north and south. Mr. Wood responded that
the Traffic Impact Analysis studied traffic in all directions generated from the site and
from surrounding developments. Mr. Wood stated that according to the traffic engineer,
the roadway network at full buildout will be able to handle the generated traffic.
Committee Member Kollar asked if the offsite improvements include 64th Street
expansion to Bell Road. Mr. Wood responded that the City is currently working on
obtaining federal funds in order to expand 64th Street to Bell Road, but this
development is not part of that.

Committee Member Gary Kirkilas thanked the applicant for incorporating green
stormwater infrastructure standards, water conservation standards, and using the wash
as a connection to the Reach 11 Recreation Area.

Chair Steven Bowser echoed appreciation for incorporation of water conservation
standards.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 225
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-25-2

Public Comments:
None.

Applicant Response:
None.

Committee Discussion:
Committee Member Kollar asked what fund does the money for the Mayo Flyover
Study Area Intergovernmental Agreement go to and what the funds will be used for. Mr.
Zambrano responded that the money would go into one fund and would be used in the
general area for regional transportation infrastructure improvements. Committee
Member Kollar asked what area the intergovernmental agreement applies to. Mr.
Zambrano responded that it would be applicable to the entire area surrounding where
the Mayo Boulevard flyover was located.

MOTION – GPA-DSTV-1-25-2:
Committee Member Warren made a motion to recommend approval of GPA-DSTV-1-
25-2, per the staff recommendation. Vice Chair Lagrave seconded the motion.

VOTE – GPA-DSTV-1-25-2:
9-0; the motion to recommend approval of GPA-DSTV-1-25-2, per the staff
recommendation passes with Committee Members Barto, Birchby, Carlucci, Kirkilas,
Kollar, Nowell, Warren, Lagrave and Bowser in favor.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

Staff has no comments.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 226
ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
MARCH 5, 2026

ITEM NO: 4
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-DSTV-1-25-2 (Companion Case Z-87-E-03-2)
Location: Southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard
From: Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre and Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park
To: Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre and Commercial
Acreage: 219.22
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to facilitate a hotel development and
higher density attached townhouses, condos, or apartments
Applicant: Jonathan Stelzer, The Plaza Companies
Owner: Jonathan Stelzer, The Plaza Companies, et al.
Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer LLP

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 12/2/2025 Information only.
Desert View 2/3/2026 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote 9-0.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Desert View Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve GPA-DSTV-1-25-2, per
the Desert View Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Matthews
Second: James
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Busching, Jaramillo
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposal will facilitate a mix of residential and commercial uses, contributing to the
land use mix in the area.

2. Existing zoning to the south and east of the companion rezoning case boundary is
consistent with the proposed Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre designation.

3. The subject site is appropriate for commercial uses, as the site is at an intersection of
two arterial streets and nearby a freeway interchange.



This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Saneeya Mir at 602-686-6461, saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.







Report

PCD Major Amendment and Public Hearing - Rezoning Application Z-87-E-03-2 -
Southeast Corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard - District 2

Request to hold a public hearing and to approve Rezoning Application Z-87-E-03-2
and rezone the site from S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD) (Ranch or Farm Residence,
Approved Commerce Park District, Business Park Option, Planned Community
District) to PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development, Planned Community District) for a
major amendment to the Paradise Ridge PCD for the Plaza Companies Hospitality
PUD to allow a hotel. This is a companion case to GPA-DSTV-1-25-2 and must be
heard following GPA-DSTV-1-25-2.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD)
Proposed Zoning: PUD PCD
Acreage: 8.20
Proposal: Major Amendment to the Paradise Ridge PCD for the Plaza Companies
Hospitality PUD to allow a hotel

Owner/Applicant: Jonathan Stelzer, The Plaza Companies
Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Information Only: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this item on
December 2, 2025, for information only.
VPC Action: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this item on February
3, 2026, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 9-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on March 5, 2026, and
recommended approval, per the staff memo dated March 5, 2026, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 6475 E. Mayo Boulevard and 18017 N. 64th Street





Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

Plaza Companies Hospitality PUD, Paradise Ridge Planned Community District
Z-87-E-03-2

Planning Commission Approved Stipulations from March 5, 2026:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Plaza Companies Hospitality PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of
this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped January 12, 2026, as modified by the
following stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date]. Change 3rd submittal
date to December 30, 2025.

b. Page 9, C. List of Uses, C1. Permitted Uses, 1st bullet point: Delete
“Restaurants with recorded music or one musician”.

c. Pages 9 and 10, C. List of Uses, C1. Permitted Uses, 2nd bullet point:
Update the font size to be the same size. Delete the extra bullet point
below the last sub-bullet point, before the Temporary Uses section.

d. Page 12, D. Development Standards, D2. Streetscape Standards: Add text
at the bottom of the page for footnote 2 which states “Per the approved
master street plans and as approved/modified by the Street Transportation
Department”.

e. Pages 12 – 14, D. Development Standards, D2. Streetscape Standards, a.
Mayo Boulevard and b. 64th Street, Live Coverage, both bullet points for
each: Replace “maintained to a maximum height of two feet” to
“maintained to a maximum height of three feet (excluding accents)”.

f. Pages 14 – 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape
Standards, b. North (Mayo Boulevard) through d. East (Adjacent to Wash),
Live Coverage, both bullet points for each: Replace “maintained to a
maximum height of two feet” with “maintained to a maximum height of
three feet (excluding accents)”.

g. Page 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape Standards,
e, South (Perimeter): Replace with “Trees: Minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in
equivalent groupings. Live Coverage: A mixture of drought-tolerant shrubs,
accents, and vegetative groundcovers, evenly distributed throughout the
landscape areas to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage”.


h. Page 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape Standards,
f. Parking Lot Landscaping: Replace “maintained to a maximum height of
two feet” with “maintained to a maximum height of three feet (excluding
accents)”.

i. Pages 17 – 18, D. Development Standards, D5. Fences/Walls: Start the
fourth sentence as a new paragraph. After this paragraph, add “An
architectural archway over 40 inches tall shall be permitted within the
building/landscape setback when provided over a pedestrian pathway
connecting from the public sidewalk to the development”.

j. Page 18, D. Development Standards, D7. Lighting, 2nd paragraph:
Replace with “Pedestrian lighting shall be provided along the public
sidewalks adjacent to 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard, along the wash
pathway, and along private internal pedestrian pathways, as follows:”.

k. Exhibits: Revise exhibits to remove parking overhang and the south
retaining wall from impeding in the required south landscape setback.

2. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AO, on panels
04013C 1315L of Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) with an effective date of
October 16, 2013. The following requirements shall apply, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

a. The Architect and Engineer are required to show the floodplain boundary
limits on the Site Plan and Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that
impacts to the proposed facilities are adequately addressed, following
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph
60.3). This includes, but is not limited to, provisions in the latest versions of
the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of the Office of the City Engineer for
review and approval of floodplain requirements.

c. Conditions for Grading and Drainage permit and Building permit:

(1) Final Grading and Drainage plans must receive approval from
Floodplain Management prior to issuance of a Grading and
Drainage permit and a Building permit.

(2) An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on Finished
Grading and Drainage and construction plans for each structure,
must be submitted to and approved by Floodplain Management prior
to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit and a Building permit.

d. Conditions for building permit (prior to issuance of vertical construction):


(1) An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on the
building under construction, must be submitted to and approved by
Floodplain Management prior to issuance of vertical construction.

(2) Compaction test results demonstrating 95% compaction for building
pads must be provided prior to issuance of vertical construction.

e. Conditions for certificate of occupancy (C of O):

(1) An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on finished
construction, must be submitted to and approved by Floodplain
Management prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

(2) An as-built plan review shall confirm that elevations shown on the
plans correspond with those documented in the Elevation Certificate
based on finished construction.

3. A bus pad on eastbound Mayo Boulevard that conforms with City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1260 shall be constructed. The pad shall be located from 64th
Street according to P1258. The bus pad must be located within the public right-of-
way or within a transit easement that the developer dedicates.

4. A minimum of 70 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the south half of Mayo
Boulevard, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th & E. Mayo Blvd.

5. A minimum of 70 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the east half of 64th
Street to its ultimate condition, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th
St. & E. Mayo Blvd.

6. A total of $5,000,000 in regional funding through ASLD shall be paid, due at the
release of grading and drainage permits, in accordance with the Mayo Flyover
Study Area Intergovernmental Agreement approved by City Council on December
7, 2022.

7. Reconstruction of the interim traffic signal at the intersection of 64th Street and
Mayo Boulevard shall be fully funded and constructed with the first phase of
development, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th St. & E. Mayo
Blvd.

8. Unless already constructed by others, the ultimate 100-year storm event box
culvert dry crossing of Mayo Boulevard east of 64th Street shall be constructed to
its full limits, including construction of the upstream and downstream
maintenance access ramps.

9. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in
the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 10, 2025.



10. Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets shall
be replaced and all off-site improvements shall be upgraded to be in compliance
with current ADA guidelines.

11. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

12. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

13. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

14. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

15. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

PCD Stipulations

16. Master Plan documents shall be submitted for portions of the Planned
Community District as development occurs, per the applicable development
agreement.

17. Right-of-way and improvements shall be determined by the final Traffic Impact
Study and a Master Street Plan – Development Agreement between the city,
Arizona State Land Department, and the City of Scottsdale. Additional right-of-
way and/or easements not specifically identified such as bus bays, turn lanes,
landscape/sidewalk easements, slope and construction easements, etc., may be
required as determined by the Master Street Plan, or when individual
development plans are submitted to the Planning and Development Department
for approval.




18. Detailed requirements for potable water, wastewater, and reclaimed water on-site
and off-site infrastructure needed to service this project and infrastructure
phasing schedules shall be determined at the time of review and approval of the
PCD potable water, wastewater, and reclaimed water master plans. Off-site
infrastructure requirements shall be a function of the amount of major master plan
water and sewer lines constructed by other development in the area prior to
initiation of this project.

Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – PCD Major Amendment Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-87-E-03-2

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF
MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

A PORTION OF TRACT MF3 OF STATE PLAT NO. 55, PARADISE RIDGE SECOND
AMENDED, RECORDED IN BOOK 949 OF MAPS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA AND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST
OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27, FROM WHICH
THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27 BEARS SOUTH 89°58'09"
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2644.14 FEET;

THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 27, NORTH 00°02'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 564.10 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WHOSE RADIUS BEARS
NORTH 20°25'52" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 9000.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, TO THE
LEFT, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5°19'3 l ",FORAN ARC LENGTH OF
836.49 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 16°23'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 177.71 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCA VE WESTERLY HAYING A RADIUS OF 290.00
FEET;

THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, TO THE RIGHT,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°45'50", FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 140.53
FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION
27;

THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, NORTH 89°58'09" WEST, A DISTANCE OF
852.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

LESS AND EXCEPTING ALL OIL, GAS OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES,
HELIUM OR OTHER SUBSTANCES OF A GASEOUS NATURE, GEOTHERMAL
RESOURCES, COAL, METALS, MINERALS, FOSSILS, FERTILIZERS OF EVERY
NAME AND DESCRIPTION , TOGETHER WITH ALL URANIUM, THORIUM OR ANY
OTHER MATERIAL WHICH MAY BE DETERMINED BY THE LAWS OF THE
UNITED STATES, OR OF THIS STATE AS RESERVED IN PATENT RECORDED
DECEMBER 20, 2024 AS 2024-0676745 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.




ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
Plaza Companies Hospitality PUD
January 26, 2026

Desert View Village Planning February 3, 2026
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 5, 2026

Request From: S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD) (Ranch or Farm
Residence, Approved Commerce Park
District, Business Park Option, Planned
Community District) (8.20 acres)
Request To: PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development,
Planned Community District) (8.20 acres)
Proposal: Major Amendment to the Paradise Ridge
PCD to allow a hotel
Location: Southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo
Boulevard
Owner/Applicant: Jonathan Stelzer, The Plaza Companies
Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


General Plan Conformity
Existing
Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per
acre
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
Proposed (GPA-DSTV-1-25-2)
Commercial (8.20 acres, PUD site) and
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
(211.02 acres, adjacent sites)
70-foot east half conditional
64th Street Arterial
PUE (Public Utility Easement)
Street Classification Map
Mayo
Arterial 70-foot south half street
Boulevard




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

General Plan Conformity
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The proposal for a six-story hotel is appropriate for this location on two arterial streets,
near a freeway, and adjacent to other sites (across 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard)
with approved zoning entitlements that allow increased height. The proposed PUD
proposes development standards to prevent negative impacts on the adjacent
residential properties.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Communities should
consist of a mix of land uses to provide housing, shopping, dining and
recreational options for residents.
The proposal will contribute to the mix of uses in the area by providing a new hotel in
proximity to the Mayo Clinic campus and other planned commercial and residential
uses.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES & SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposed PUD sets forth development standards that require enhanced
landscaping and shade, including detached sidewalks and minimum shade
requirements for bicycle infrastructure, sidewalks, pedestrian pathways, and parking
areas. This will help to provide shade for pedestrians and bicyclists in and around the
community and to mitigate the urban heat island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus
cooling the micro-climate around the vicinity.



Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Desert Ridge Kierland Major Employment Corridor – See Background Item No. 15.
Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan – See Background Item No. 16.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See Background Item No. 17.
Complete Streets Design Guidelines – See Background Item No. 18.
Zero Waste PHX – See Background Item No. 19.
Monarch Butterfly Pledge – See Background Item No. 20.




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Phoenix Climate Action Plan – See Background Item No. 21.
Transportation Electrification Action Plan – See Background Item No. 22.
Conservation Measures for New Development – See Background Item No. 23.
Shade Phoenix Plan – See Background Item No. 24.


Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
S-1 (Approved CP/BP
On Site Vacant land
PCD)
North (across Mayo Vacant land (planned multifamily S-1 (Approved PUD
Boulevard) residential) PCD)
Vacant land (planned single- R1-18 (Approved R-
South
family attached townhomes) 3A PCD)
East Single-family residential R-3A PCD
West (across 64th Street) Vacant land CP/BP DRSP

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone an 8.20-acre site located at the southeast corner of 64th
Street and Mayo Boulevard from S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD) (Ranch or Farm
Residence, Approved Commerce Park District, Business Park Option, Planned
Community District) to PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development, Planned Community
District) for a Major Amendment to the Paradise Ridge PCD to allow a hotel.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
2. The subject site is designated as Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre on the
General Plan Land Use Map. To the south and east of the site is designated as
Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre. To the north is designated as
Commercial / Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre. To the west is designated as
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park. The applicant is proposing a minor
General Plan Amendment (GPA-DSTV-1-25-2) to change the designation of the
subject site to Commercial and to change the designation of the adjacent sites to
the northeast, east, and south with approved R-3A zoning to Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre. The uses allowed in the proposed PUD are consistent with
the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation.




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026




Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
3. To the east is single-family residential zoned R-3A PCD (Multifamily Residence
District, Planned Community District). To the north, across Mayo Boulevard, is
vacant land planned for multifamily residential, zoned S-1 (Approved PUD PCD)



Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

(Ranch or Farm Residence, Approved Planned Unit Development, Planned
Community District). To the west, across 64th Street, is vacant land zoned CP/BP
DRSP (Commerce Park District, Business Park Option, Desert Ridge Specific
Plan). To the south is vacant land planned for single-family attached townhomes
zoned R1-18 (Approved R-3A PCD) (Single-Family Residence District, Approved
Multifamily Residence District, Planned Community District).




Zoning Aerial Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

PARADISE RIDGE PCD
4. The Paradise Ridge PCD, generally bounded by Scottsdale Road to the east, 64th
Street to the west, Pinnacle Peak Road to the north, and the CAP canal to the
south, was initially established in 1994. The subject site was zoned R-2 SP (Multi-
Family Residence District, Special Permit) PCD in the original PCD approval. In
2003, a Major Amendment to the Paradise Ridge PCD was approved for a
significant portion of the southern part of the PCD area, changing the subject site to
CP/BP (Commerce Park District, Business Park Option) PCD. These zoning
designations remain on the subject site today.




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

PROPOSAL
5. The proposal was developed utilizing the PUD zoning district. The Planned Unit
Development (PUD) is intended to create a built environment that is superior to that
produced by conventional zoning districts and design guidelines. Using a
collaborative and comprehensive approach, an applicant authors and proposes
standards and guidelines that are tailored to the context of a site on a case by case
basis. Where the PUD Development Narrative is silent on a requirement, the
applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions will be applied.

6. The PUD proposes a six-story hotel with 260 hotel rooms. The existing north-south
wash through the site will remain and will include a trail along it, which will facilitate
pedestrian connectivity from the south to Mayo Boulevard.

7. Land Use
The proposed development narrative allows hotels and restaurants, bars, and
cocktail lounges as primary uses and associated accessory uses.

8. Development Standards
The table below summarizes the key development standards set forth in the
narrative, which are most closely analogous to the CP/BP zoning district. The
building height allowed in the proposed PUD is more than the height of 56 feet
allowed in the CP/BP district, the proposed PUD allows a smaller building setback
adjacent to Mayo Boulevard than would be required in the CP/BP district, and the
proposed PUD requires larger building setbacks not adjacent to a street than would
be required in the CP/BP district. The proposed parking matches the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance requirement. Standards for shade and bicycle parking in the PUD
exceed Phoenix Zoning Ordinance standards.

Standard PUD Proposed
Maximum Building 88 feet to top of parapet
Height
Maximum Hotel Keys 260
Maximum Lot 20% of total net site area
Coverage
Minimum Perimeter North (Mayo Boulevard): 20 feet
Building Setbacks West (64th Street): 20 feet
East: 250 feet
South: 70 feet
Vehicular Parking 1 space per hotel key
Bicycle Parking 10 spaces
Minimum Shade Public Sidewalks and Shared-Use Paths: 75%,
achieved by shade trees
Private Sidewalks, Pedestrian Pathways, and Shared-
Use Paths: 50%




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

Corners of Traffic Signals: 75%, to allow pedestrians to
wait comfortably for the signal to change, subject to
sight visibility requirements
Transit Stops: 75%
Bicycle Parking and Bicycle Repair Stations: 75%
Surface Parking Areas: 15%
Gathering Areas and Seating Areas: 50%
Improved Open Space and Usable Open Space: 50%

The proposed PUD includes a provision in the Parking Standards sub-section of the
Development Standards section that allows a reduced depth of parking space and
drive aisle dimensions combined, and one less loading space than would be
required by the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance standard. The Traffic Services Division
reviewed and approved the proposed depth.

Staff recommends several modifications to the PUD Development Narrative in order
to make minor technical corrections. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 1.a
through 1.c and 1.i.

The landscape review team in the Site Planning Division has requested that live
coverage be maintained to a maximum of three feet in height, rather than two feet,
and that this height restriction exclude accents. This is addressed in Stipulation
Nos. 1.d, 1.e, and 1.g.

The Site Planning Division also identified that parking overhang is proposed to
impede within the required south landscape setback, which is not permitted. Staff
recommends that the exhibits be revised to remove parking overhang from the
south landscape setback and to enhance the planting standards for the south
landscape setback. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 1.f and 1.j.

The subject site is located within the Paradise Ridge PCD. Staff recommends
including relevant PCD stipulations that require Master Plans to be submitted for
any development, right-of-way improvements to be subject to a Master Street Plan,
and water and wastewater to be subject to Master Plan requirements. These are
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 16 through 18.

9. Landscape Standards
The PUD sets forth standards for perimeter landscape setbacks and landscaping
within adjacent rights-of-way. The table below summarizes the key landscape
standards. The landscape setbacks adjacent to streets proposed in the PUD are
less than would be required in the CP/BP district. The streetscape and all the
planting standards exceed the requirements of the CP/BP district.




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

Standard PUD Proposed
Minimum Landscape North (Mayo Boulevard): 20 feet
Setbacks West (64th Street): 20 feet
East (measured from the top of the west bank of the
wash): 20 feet
South: 5 feet
Planting Standards Trees: Minimum 50% 1.5-inch caliper, 25% 2-inch
(Perimeter Landscape caliper, and 25% 3-inch caliper, large canopy, drought-
Setbacks Adjacent to tolerant, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in
Streets) equivalent groupings
Live Coverage: Minimum five 5-gallon drought-tolerant
shrubs per tree and minimum 75% live coverage
Planting Standards Trees: Minimum 50% 1.5-inch caliper, 25% 2-inch
(East Perimeter caliper, and 25% 3-inch caliper, large canopy, drought-
Landscape Setback tolerant, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in
Adjacent to Wash) equivalent groupings, on both sides of the wash
pathway to provide 75% shade
Live Coverage: Minimum five 5-gallon drought-tolerant
shrubs per tree and minimum 75% live coverage
Planting Standards Minimum five-gallon drought-tolerant shrubs to achieve
(South Perimeter a minimum of 75% live coverage
Landscape Setback)
Parking Lot Minimum 10% of interior surface parking area (exclusive
Landscaping of perimeter landscaping and all required setbacks)
shall be landscaped. Landscape planters planted with
minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy,
drought-tolerant, shade trees and a minimum of five 5-
gallon drought-tolerant shrubs per tree
Streetscape Mayo Boulevard: 8-foot-wide detached sidewalk, 10-
foot-wide landscape area between back of curb and
sidewalk

64th Street: 10-foot-wide detached sidewalk, 10-foot-
wide landscape area between back of curb and
sidewalk

10. Fences and Walls
The PUD proposes compliance with Phoenix Zoning Ordinance standards for
fences and walls with two exceptions:
• A perimeter site fence or wall enclosing the development is not permitted
(with the exception for any wall constructed on the south property line by the
separate property owner, resulting in a shared wall condition, except along
the shared-use path easement along the east side of the site).
• All parking areas are required to be screened from public rights-of-way and



Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

adjacent developments, which may consist of decorative solid masonry walls
a minimum of 40 inches in height, landscaping, or other functionally
integrated site features, or may be screened behind buildings. Breaks in
screening are permitted for no more than 10 percent of any individual
parking frontage to provide visual interest, articulation, and to enhanced site
permeability.

11. Lighting
The PUD proposes compliance with Phoenix Zoning Ordinance standards related
to lighting with additional lighting requirements as follows:
• Pedestrian lighting along private and public sidewalks to provide adequate
and consistent illumination along walkways, in addition to a maximum height
of 15 feet for light fixtures.
• Along the wash corridor pedestrian trail, illuminated bollards are required to
be located 60 feet on center along the length of the trail.

12. Design Guidelines
The PUD proposes design guidelines that enhance the appearance and
functionality of the buildings and amenities on-site. Buildings will use a color palette
that complements the desert landscape and will provide a variety of materials on
each building façade. Buildings will not have blank walls exceeding 50 feet in
length, and the wash corridor will have amenity requirements.

The PUD proposes design guidelines for treatment of the Mayo Boulevard street
frontage, including an artistic or decorative wall feature along Mayo Boulevard and
enhanced pedestrian nodes.

The PUD proposes a variety of other design guidelines, including screen walls to
utilize architectural detailing consistent or complementary to the building façade,
pedestrian connections to the public sidewalks and wash corridor pathway, traffic
calming standards, entry/exit enhancements, a public bicycle repair station, and
water conservation standards.

13. Signs
The PUD proposes that signage comply with the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

14. Sustainability
The PUD proposes dual glaze windows with high performance low-e glazing, that
all primary site lighting be LED lighting, that water efficient landscaping be provided,
various water conservation measures, and that recycling be provided for hotel
guests and visitors internal to the building.




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

AREA PLANS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND INITIATIVES
15. Desert Ridge Kierland Major Employment Corridor
The subject site is located within the Desert Ridge Kierland Major Employment
Corridor. This employment corridor along the Loop 101 Freeway includes corporate
offices, healthcare facilities, and regional retail centers in the Desert Ridge,
Paradise Ridge, and Kierland areas. The proposed PUD allows for the creation of
short-term stays to support major employers in close proximity to their campuses.




Major Employment Centers and Corridors Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

16. Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan
In November 1987, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Peripheral Areas C and D
General Plan. In the Phoenix General Plan 1985-2000, four peripheral planning
areas were identified and designated for special study independent of the process
that led to the development of the General Plan. Two of these areas, consisting of
approximately 111 largely undeveloped square miles, are in the far north and are
generally referred to as the land above the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal.
These areas have been designated Peripheral Areas C and D, generally bounded
by Carefree Highway on the north, the Scottsdale corporate boundary on the east,
the CAP and Jomax Road on the south, and 67th Avenue on the west. Jomax Road
is the dividing line between Area C on the south and Area D on the north. The plan
is an amendment to the Phoenix General Plan that provides recommendations
regarding land use and development characteristics to build-out of the planning
area. The plan is intended to be consistent with and build on the goals and policies
identified in the General Plan. The plan contains seven goals that reflect the




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

multiple facets of the broad public interest in providing for development of these
sensitive lands in an orderly and efficiency manner while respecting their unique
and special characteristics.

The subject site is within Area C of the plan. The PUD is consistent with the
following goals from the plan:

• Goal 2: Preserve environmental amenities.
The PUD will preserve the wash on the east side of the site.

• Goal 6: Conserve water.
The PUD incorporates design guidelines that address water conservation,
including low-water-use plants.




Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan Planning Area Boundary Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

17. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of destinations.



Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

In order to address the goals of this plan, the PUD requires the following:
• A minimum of 10 bicycle parking space to be provided, installed per the
requirements in the WU Code and located near the main lobby entrance
• A minimum of one bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) to be provided and
maintained on site along the wash corridor, adjacent to the wash pathway.

18. Complete Streets Design Guidelines
In 2018, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Design Guidelines.
The design guidelines are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. In order to address these design
guidelines, the PUD requires detached and shaded sidewalks on both streets.
Additionally, the Public Transit Department requested that a bus pad on eastbound
Mayo Boulevard be constructed.

19. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the City’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use developments
meeting certain criteria. Recycling is addressed in the Sustainability Section.

20. Monarch Butterfly Pledge
In April 2021, Mayor Kate Gallego signed the National Wildlife Federation’s Mayor’s
Monarch Pledge. This pledge commits the city to take action to support the
monarch butterfly population. In the United States, loss of milkweed habitat is a
major factor in the decline of the monarchs. Arizona has at least 29 species of
milkweed native to the state. Adult monarchs feed on the nectar of many flowers,
but they breed only where milkweeds are found. In order to support the monarch
butterfly population, the PUD requires a minimum of 10 percent of the required
shrubs be a milkweed or other native nectar species and be planted in groups of
three or more.

21. Phoenix Climate Action Plan
In October 2021, the Phoenix City Council approved the Climate Action Plan. The
Climate Action Plan will serve as a long-term plan to achieve greenhouse gas
emissions reductions and resiliency goals from local operations and community
activities as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change. This plan contains
policy and initiatives regarding stationary energy, transportation, waste
management, air quality, local food systems, heat, and water. Goal W2 (Water),
Action W2.4, pertains to the implementation of the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

Management to benefit the environment, promote water conservation, reduce urban
heat, improve the public health, and create additional green spaces. In order to
address this goal, the PUD requires a minimum of two green stormwater
infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater management to be implemented.

22. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation Electrification
Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of transportation is both
a national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for better air quality, a
reduction in carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle operating and
maintenance costs. Businesses, governments and the public are signaling strong
future demand for electric vehicles (EVs), and many automobile manufacturers
have declared plans for a transition to fully electric offerings within the coming
decade. This Plan contains policy initiatives to prepare the City for a future filled
with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-mobility equity, and outlines a
roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV infrastructure needs of 280,000
EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan to accelerate public adoption of
electric vehicles through workplace, business, and multifamily charging
infrastructure recommends a standard stipulation for rezoning cases to provide EV
charging infrastructure. In order to address the goals of this plan, the PUD requires
a minimum of three percent of the required standard parking spaces and 12.5
percent of the required accessible parking spaces to include EV Installed
infrastructure. Additionally, one electrical outlet is required adjacent to bicycle
parking for electric bicycle charging capabilities.

23. Conservation Measures for New Development
In June 2023, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Conservation Measures for
New Development policy as part of a resolution addressing the future water
consumption of new development (Resolution 22129). This resolution addresses
the future water consumption of new development to support one of the City’s Five
Core Values in the General Plan which calls for Phoenix to “Build the Sustainable
Desert City”. The Conservation Measures for New Development policy includes
direction to develop standard stipulations for all rezoning cases that will address
best practices related to water usage in nine specific categories. In order to address
this policy, the PUD requires the following:
• Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area
Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized.
• Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas and functional
turf areas.
• Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to
minimize maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite
landscape irrigation.
• Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and/or drip lines shall be utilized in any
turf areas to reduce water waste.



Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

• A leak detection device shall be installed for the irrigation system of
landscape areas larger than 10,000 square feet.
• A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management be implemented.
• Documentation shall be provided that demonstrates a commitment to
participate in the City of Phoenix Businesses Water Efficiency Program for a
minimum of 20 years.
• A minimum of 10% of the gross area of the site shall be preserved and
dedicated as permanent undisturbed open space.

24. Shade Phoenix Plan
In November 2024, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Shade Phoenix Plan. The
Shade Phoenix Plan prioritizes increasing shade coverage throughout the City to
improve health and quality of life. Investing in shade can address the urban heat
island effect, clean the air, preserve Sonoran vegetation, and prevent health
complications related to prolonged exposure to heat. The Shade Phoenix Plan
provides numerous strategies to increase shade including expanding and
maintaining existing shade, strengthening tree code enforcement, and developing
shade stipulations in rezoning cases. In order to address the goals of this plan, the
PUD requires the following:
• Minimum 75 percent shade for public sidewalks and shared-use paths.
• Minimum 50 percent shade for private sidewalks, pedestrian pathways, and
shared-use paths.
• Minimum 75 percent shade for corners of traffic signals to allow for
pedestrians to wait comfortably for the signal to change, subject to sight
visibility requirements.
• Minimum 75 percent shade for transit stops.
• Minimum 75 percent shade for bicycle parking and bicycle repair stations.
• Minimum 15 percent shade for surface parking areas.
• Minimum 50 percent shade for gathering areas, seating areas, improved
open space, and usable open space.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
25. At the time this staff report was written, staff has received three letters of
opposition. Concerns include traffic, impact to character of adjacent neighborhoods,
building height, signage incompatibility with desert character, and safety.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
26. Floodplain Management
The Floodplain Management division of the Office of the City Engineer provided the
comment that the subject site is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area and
that any proposed improvements or modifications are subject to federal regulations
and the City of Phoenix Floodplain Ordinance. The Floodplain Management division



Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

must approve a Grading and Drainage Plan demonstrating compliance with the
regulations prior to any permit issuance. This comment is addressed in Stipulation
No. 2.

27. Public Transit Department
The Public Transit Department requested that a bus pad be constructed on
eastbound Mayo Boulevard. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 3.

28. Street Transportation Department
The Street Transportation Department commented the following:
• Right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the south half of Mayo
Boulevard and the east half of 64th Street.
• A total of $5,000,000 in regional funding through ASLD shall be paid.
• Reconstruction of the interim traffic signal at the intersection of 64th Street
and Mayo Boulevard shall be fully funded and constructed with the first
phase of development.
• The 100-year box culvert dry crossing of Mayo Boulevard east of 64th Street
shall be constructed to its full limits.
• All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified
in the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis.
• Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb, and gutter.
• The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with all required improvements and comply with ADA
standards.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 4 through 11.

OTHER
29. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. If
further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site and
immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous archaeological
projects have been conducted within this project area, it is recommended that
archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted. Phase II
archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based upon the
results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this determination in
consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event archaeological
materials are encountered during construction, all ground disturbing activities must
cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery, and the City of Phoenix Archaeology
Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess the
materials. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 12 through 14.

30. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require
the form be completed and submitted prior to final site plan approval. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 15.

31. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be
required.

Findings

1. The proposal is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designation (GPA-DSTV-1-25-2) and the character of the surrounding area.

2. The proposal will facilitate new commercial development at an appropriate location,
contributing to the land use mix in the area.

3. The proposed PUD supports efforts from various plans, policies, and
initiatives, including the Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan, the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, the Complete Streets Design Guidelines, the
Zero Waste PHX initiative, the Monarch Butterfly Pledge initiative, the Phoenix
Climate Action Plan, the Transportation Electrification Action Plan, the Conservation
Measures for New Development policy, and the Shade Phoenix Plan.

Stipulations

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Plaza Companies Hospitality PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of
this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped January 12, 2026, as modified by the
following stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date]. Change 3rd submittal
date to December 30, 2025.

b. Page 9, C. List of Uses, C1. Permitted Uses, 1st bullet point: Delete
“Restaurants with recorded music or one musician”.

c. Pages 9 and 10, C. List of Uses, C1. Permitted Uses, 2nd bullet point: Update
the font size to be the same size. Delete the extra bullet point below the last
sub-bullet point, before the Temporary Uses section.




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

d. Pages 12 – 14, D. Development Standards, D2. Streetscape Standards, a.
Mayo Boulevard and b. 64th Street, Live Coverage, both bullet points for
each: Replace “maintained to a maximum height of two feet” to “maintained to
a maximum height of three feet (excluding accents)”.

e. Pages 14 – 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape
Standards, b. North (Mayo Boulevard) through d. East (Adjacent to Wash),
Live Coverage, both bullet points for each: Replace “maintained to a
maximum height of two feet” with “maintained to a maximum height of three
feet (excluding accents)”.

f. Page 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape Standards, e,
South (Perimeter): Replace with “Trees: Minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in
equivalent groupings. Live Coverage: A mixture of drought-tolerant shrubs,
accents, and vegetative groundcovers, evenly distributed throughout the
landscape areas to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage”.

g. Page 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape Standards, f.
Parking Lot Landscaping: Replace “maintained to a maximum height of two
feet” with “maintained to a maximum height of three feet (excluding accents)”.

h. Pages 17 – 18, D. Development Standards, D5. Fences/Walls: Start the
fourth sentence as a new paragraph. After this paragraph, add “An
architectural archway over 40 inches tall shall be permitted within the
building/landscape setback when provided over a pedestrian pathway
connecting from the public sidewalk to the development”.

i. Page 18, D. Development Standards, D7. Lighting, 2nd paragraph: Replace
with “Pedestrian lighting shall be provided along the public sidewalks adjacent
to 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard, along the wash pathway, and along
private internal pedestrian pathways, as follows:”.

j. Exhibits: Revise exhibits to remove parking overhang and the south retaining
wall from impeding in the required south landscape setback.

2. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AO, on panels
04013C 1315L of Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) with an effective date of
October 16, 2013. The following requirements shall apply, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

a. The Architect and Engineer are required to show the floodplain boundary
limits on the Site Plan and Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that
impacts to the proposed facilities are adequately addressed, following
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph
60.3). This includes, but is not limited to, provisions in the latest versions of
the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the Floodplain
Management section of the Office of the City Engineer for review and
approval of floodplain requirements.

c. Conditions for Grading and Drainage permit and Building permit:

1. Final Grading and Drainage plans must receive approval from
Floodplain Management prior to issuance of a Grading and Drainage
permit and a Building permit.

2. An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on Finished
Grading and Drainage and construction plans for each structure, must
be submitted to and approved by Floodplain Management prior to
issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit and a Building permit.

d. Conditions for building permit (prior to issuance of vertical construction):

1. An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on the building
under construction, must be submitted to and approved by Floodplain
Management prior to issuance of vertical construction.

2. Compaction test results demonstrating 95% compaction for building
pads must be provided prior to issuance of vertical construction.

e. Conditions for certificate of occupancy (C of O):

1. An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on finished
construction, must be submitted to and approved by Floodplain
Management prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

2. An as-built plan review shall confirm that elevations shown on the plans
correspond with those documented in the Elevation Certificate based on
finished construction.

3. A bus pad on eastbound Mayo Boulevard that conforms with City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1260 shall be constructed. The pad shall be located from 64th
Street according to P1258. The bus pad must be located within the public right-of-
way or within a transit easement that the developer dedicates.




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026


4. A minimum of 70 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the south half of Mayo
Boulevard, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th & E. Mayo Blvd.

5. A minimum of 70 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the east half of 64th
Street to its ultimate condition, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th St.
& E. Mayo Blvd.

6. A total of $5,000,000 in regional funding through ASLD shall be paid, due at the
release of grading and drainage permits, in accordance with the Mayo Flyover
Study Area Intergovernmental Agreement approved by City Council on December
7, 2022.

7. Reconstruction of the interim traffic signal at the intersection of 64th Street and
Mayo Boulevard shall be fully funded and constructed with the first phase of
development, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th St. & E. Mayo Blvd.

8. Unless already constructed by others, the ultimate 100-year storm event box culvert
dry crossing of Mayo Boulevard east of 64th Street shall be constructed to its full
limits, including construction of the upstream and downstream maintenance access
ramps.

9. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in the
accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 10, 2025.

10. Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets shall be
replaced and all off-site improvements shall be upgraded to be in compliance with
current ADA guidelines.

11. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping, and
other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

12. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

13. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the Phase
I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified archaeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

14. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

15. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

PCD Stipulations

16. Master Plan documents shall be submitted for portions of the Planned Community
District as development occurs, per the applicable development agreement.

17. Right-of-way and improvements shall be determined by the final Traffic Impact
Study and a Master Street Plan – Development Agreement between the city,
Arizona State Land Department, and the City of Scottsdale. Additional right-of-way
and/or easements not specifically identified such as bus bays, turn lanes,
landscape/sidewalk easements, slope and construction easements, etc., may be
required as determined by the Master Street Plan, or when individual development
plans are submitted to the Planning and Development Department for approval.

18. Detailed requirements for potable water, wastewater, and reclaimed water on-site
and off-site infrastructure needed to service this project and infrastructure phasing
schedules shall be determined at the time of review and approval of the PCD
potable water, wastewater, and reclaimed water master plans. Off-site infrastructure
requirements shall be a function of the amount of major master plan water and
sewer lines constructed by other development in the area prior to initiation of this
project.

Writer
Adrian Zambrano
January 26, 2026

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch Map
Aerial Map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped January 12, 2026 (4 pages)
Conceptual Landscape Plan date stamped January 12, 2026 (5 pages)
Conceptual Elevations date stamped January 12, 2026 (3 pages)
Conceptual Renderings date stamped January 12, 2026 (5 pages)




Staff Report: Z-87-E-03-2
January 26, 2026

Community Correspondence (5 pages)
Plaza Companies Hospitality PUD development narrative date stamped January 12,




w
v
C-2 M-R PCD
Z-87-03
S-1



PUD PCD*
CP/BP * Z-87-D-03 R-3A PCD*
Desert Ridge
Specific Plan Z-87-03
PUD
S-1 PCD *
66TH ST
MA Z-75-A-94
YO
B LVD
C-2
Z-83-01
CP/BP PCD
ANX 256
Z-87-03



R1-18 R-3A PCD * C-2*
66T Z-87-03 ANX 417



64TH ST
Z-64-08 C-2
HS Z-105-06
R1-8 PCD *
PUD* Z-75-94
T
ROSE C-2


65TH PL
Z-4-23 MARI

68TH ST
R-3A PCD* E LN
ANX 397
C-2* Z-87-07
Z-87-03


R-5 PCD*
C-2
Z-7-07
R-3A PCD * Z-7-07
C-2

Z-59-05
WAY
ANX 428
Z-10-09
CENT
Z-87-03
RAL CHAUNCEY LN
66TH
ARIZ
ONA
R1-6 PCD * VILL
PRO
JE CT A RI
GRA Z-75-94 TA D
N ITE R
EEF
AQU
R C-2*
R1-18 EDU
CT PL
MAR
Z-174-04

65 ISA
TH LN
ZO




¯
NA
PR CAREFREE HWY
OJ DOVE VALLEY RD
EC
T LONE MOUNTAIN RD
DYNAMITE BLVD
Miles
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Z-87-E-03-2 JOMAX RD
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD

DESERT VIEW VILLAGE

CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101




BLACK MTN PKY
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD

56TH ST

64TH ST

SCOTTSDALE RD


REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Pacific Realty Commercial
FROM: S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD) ( 8.20 ac.)
DATE:
9/24/2025
APPLICATION NO: Z-87-E-03-2 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
PUD PCD ( 8.20 ac.)
8.20 Acres QS 39-43 M-12
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD) 8 (N/A) N/A (N/A)
PUD PCD 0 0
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 259
S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2025\Z-87-E-03.aprx
w
v
C-2 M-R PCD
Z-87-03
S-1



PUD PCD*
CP/BP * Z-87-D-03 R-3A PCD*
Desert Ridge
Specific Plan Z-87-03
PUD
S-1 PCD *
66TH ST
MA Z-75-A-94
YO
B LVD
C-2
Z-83-01
CP/BP PCD
ANX 256
Z-87-03



R1-18 R-3A PCD * C-2*
66T Z-87-03 ANX 417



64TH ST
Z-64-08 C-2
HS Z-105-06
R1-8 PCD *
PUD* Z-75-94
T
ROSE C-2


65TH PL
Z-4-23 MARI

68TH ST
R-3A PCD* E LN
ANX 397
C-2* Z-87-07
Z-87-03


R-5 PCD*
C-2
Z-7-07
R-3A PCD * Z-7-07
C-2

Z-59-05
WAY
ANX 428
Z-10-09
CENT
Z-87-03
RAL CHAUNCEY LN
66TH
ARIZ
ONA
R1-6 PCD * VILL
PRO
JE CT A RI
GRA Z-75-94 TA D
N ITE R
EEF
AQU
R C-2*
R1-18 EDU
CT PL
MAR
Z-174-04

65 ISA
TH LN
ZO




¯
NA
PR CAREFREE HWY
OJ DOVE VALLEY RD
EC
T LONE MOUNTAIN RD
DYNAMITE BLVD
Miles
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Z-87-E-03-2 JOMAX RD
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD

DESERT VIEW VILLAGE

CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101




BLACK MTN PKY
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 MAYO BLVD
TATUM BLVD

56TH ST

64TH ST

SCOTTSDALE RD


REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Pacific Realty Commercial
FROM: S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD) ( 8.20 ac.)
DATE:
9/24/2025
APPLICATION NO: Z-87-E-03-2 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
PUD PCD ( 8.20 ac.)
8.20 Acres QS 39-43 M-12
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD) 8 (N/A) N/A (N/A)
PUD PCD 0 0
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 260
S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2025\Z-87-E-03.aprx
CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
Planning & Development
Department




+/- 250’




+/- 180’




+/- 70’




SITE & PROJECT DATA
GROSS AREA: 354,937 SF, 8.15 AC MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS
NET AREA: 261,769 SF, 6.10 AC NORTH: 60’
WEST: 140’
EAST: 250’
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 74’ SOUTH: 70’
MAXIMUM HEIGHT (W/ PARAPET): 88’
MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS
MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: 20% NORTH: 20’
WEST: 20’
MAXIMUM HOTEL KEYS: 260 EAST: 40’
REQUIRED PARKING: 1 SP/KEY SOUTH: 5’




CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
SITE PLAN NOTES
Planning & Development
Department
∆




VICINITY MAP




MA
YO
BO
ULE
VAR
D




PHOENIX, ARIZONA
64TH STREET
N 64TH ST & E MAYO BLVD
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN

MATCH LINE: SEE SHEET SP3




NORTH
MATCH LINE: SEE SHEET SP2

N
R
TI O
FO C
T U
DEVELOPER/OWNER ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER LAND SURVEYOR BASIS OF BEARING NOTES O R
N
ST
N
O
C


SP1
1 3




MATCH LINE: SEE SHEET SP1




64TH STREET




MATCH LINE: SEE SHEET SP3




SITE PLAN NOTES
PHOENIX, ARIZONA


LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER TITLE REPORT) SITE DATA LEGEND
N 64TH ST & E MAYO BLVD
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN




NOTES

CITY OF PHOENIX
NORTH


N
JAN 12 2026 R O
TI
FO C
T U
O R
Planning & Development N
ST
N
O
C
Department
SP2
2 3




MATCH LINE: SEE SHEET SP2 MATCH LINE: SEE SHEET SP1
MAY
OB
OUL
EVA
RD
∆
∆
Planning & Development
JAN 12 2026 NOTES
Department CITY OF PHOENIX SITE PLAN NOTES
NORTH
3 C N 64TH ST & E MAYO BLVD
O N
N O
ST T
3 R PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
SP3 U FO
C R
TI
O
N PHOENIX, ARIZONA
CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
Planning & Development
Department



86' 
 - 0"
 
86'
 - 0"

83'
 
 - 0"


0 0 0
(
(
723
 
 

173' 
- 
6"
(
( (
( 72522)
6 
( (   168' 
- 
6"
* * 6($/

* * %2'(&.
 
 
  

( /HYHO
(   
(

( ( (  
(
/HYHO
(   
( ( (

( (
(  
 
  ( /HYHO
( ( (   

 
(
/HYHO 7KLVGUDZLQJDQGDOOSULQWVRILWDUHWKH
SURSHUW\RI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV,QF
   5HSURGXFWLRQVRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVZLWKRXW
0 WKHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV
,QFLVQRWSHUPLWWHGDQG0D\VH 
$VVRFLDWHV,QFUHWDLQVDOOFRPPRQODZDQG
0   VWDWXWRU\DQGRWKHUUHVHUYHGULJKWV
0 LQFOXGLQJWKHFRS\ULJKW
(
0 /HYHO
0 * 0
0   
67   67
*  
67 67 67 (QJLQHH
 
67 *  
(  
* U
  *

/(9(/
  


& 1257+(/(9$7,21 1257+
3    3+2(1,;1($5
0$<2&/,1,&
1WK67 (0$<2%/9'
3+2(1,;$=




723
173'
 - 
  6"

1257+3+2(1,;1($50$<2&/,1,&
 
(

(
(
%2'(&.
 
 

/HYHO
(   
(
(
(
 


( ( /HYHO
  

 
( 3/$=$&203$1,(6$02
  /HYHO
:7+81'(5%,5'5'
  
( 68,7(
(
3(25,$$5,=21$
 

/HYHO
( (
(    )$<7++263,7$/,7<*5283//&
(
 
%(/0217$9(
'$//$67;
/HYHO
  
5HYLVLRQV
(
 &21&(376(7
67  
(


/(9(/
  
GUDZQE\
$ 6287+(/(9$7,21
3   
GDWH
30
(;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1' */$=,1*),1,6+/(*(1'
MREQR

67 ( ( 0
( ( 6 * VKHHWWLWOH
7+,16721( ; (,)6 (,)6 67$1',1*6($0 *
(,)6 (,)6 63$1'5(/ %521=( (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216&2/25
6$1'&$1<21 &2/21,$/7$1 $17+5$&,7(&2$/ 7(55$&277$ 6+()),(/'
$0(5,6721( 5()/(&7,7 +$00(5(' $7/$17,&$63$1'5(/ $7/$17,&$ 9,752
)/$*6721( &5($0 6$1'%/$677(;785( ),1(66(60227+),1,6+ 0(7$/6,17(51$7,21$/ VKHHWQR
6('21$5(' &233(560227+ 9,752,&'&2$7,1*6 9,752
&2521$'26721( '5<9,7 '5<9,7
'5<9,7 '5<9,7 0
:' &2/8016 *
( 0 *
( &+$03$*1( 6+()),(/' *
$//85$),%(5&(0(17 (
/$36,',1*  ; (,)6 67$1',1*6($0 0(7$/6,17(51$7,21$/ &/($5 62/$5%/8( 237,*5$<
(,)6 (,)6 &233(5 6+()),(/' 9,752
5867,&6(5,(6 6($6&$3( ),1(66( 9,752 9,752 3
6:+($57< &27721 0(7$/6,17(51$7,21$/
6800(5:+($7 60227+),1,6+ 0
25$1*( ),1(66( 6$1'%/$677(;785(
:22'721( '5<9,7
60227+),1,6+ '5<9,7 08//,216
30 '5<9,7 '$5.%521=( .$:1((5
$XWRGHVN'RFVB7DSHVWU\ +:6'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B7DSHVWU\ +RPHZRRG6XLWHV'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B59%XLOGLQJUYW




‹0$<6( $662&,$7(6,1&
81$87+25,=(''83/,&$7,21352+,%,7('




CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
Planning & Development
Department

*/$=,1*),1,6+/(*(1'

6
63$1'5(/
$7/$17,&$63$1'5(/
9,752,&'&2$7,1*6


83' 0"

 - 86'
 -
 0"

*
0 *5$0
9,752

( 6($/
(
723 5< *
   72 ,1
173'
 6"
- 
 *
/$ ,77 1
( $7/$17,&$ 8 2
72522) * 50 7,
 6"
168'- 
  9,752
  5( 3( 8&
5 / 5
( ( )2 $ 67
%2'(&. * 2
7 29 21
 
  
 1 35 &
3$&,),&$ 3 5
/HYHO $ 2
9,752
  
(

(
(
&21&(37
 
*
/HYHO %521=(
6(7,1
   9,752
352*(66
 
* 7KLVGUDZLQJDQGDOOSULQWVRILWDUHWKH
SURSHUW\RI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV,QF
  /HYHO 5HSURGXFWLRQVRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVZLWKRXW
( 237,*5$< WKHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV
   9,752 ,QFLVQRWSHUPLWWHGDQG0D\VH 
( $VVRFLDWHV,QFUHWDLQVDOOFRPPRQODZDQG
VWDWXWRU\DQGRWKHUUHVHUYHGULJKWV
LQFOXGLQJWKHFRS\ULJKW
 
( *
( /HYHO
   &/($5
0 9,752
(QJLQHH
(  
:' U
0 0 /HYHO
67    (;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1'
( 0 ( 67

67 67
 
7+,16721( ;
1257+
6$1'&$1<21
/(9(/ )/$*6721( &5($0 3+2(1,;1($5
&2521$'26721(
   0$<2&/,1,&
:'
$//85$),%(5&(0(17 1WK67 (0$<2%/9'
/$36,',1*  ; 3+2(1,;$=
5867,&6(5,(6
6800(5:+($7
& ($67%8,/',1*(/(9$7,21 :22'721(
3   

(
(,)6
83' 0"

 - $0(5,6721( 1257+3+2(1,;1($50$<2&/,1,&

86'
 0"
- 6('21$5('
'5<9,7
0


:' 0 (
(
(,)6
( 723 6:+($57<
   6"
173'- 
  25$1*( ),1(66(
60227+),1,6+
( 72522) '5<9,7
 
 6"
168'- 
 
(
%2'(&. (,)6
   5()/(&7,7 +$00(5('
  
 &233(560227+
/HYHO '5<9,7
   3/$=$&203$1,(6$02
( * (
( ( :7+81'(5%,5'5'
*  
(,)6 68,7(
* &27721
/HYHO 6$1'%/$677(;785(
3(25,$$5,=21$
(    '5<9,7


  ( )$<7++263,7$/,7<*5283//&
( (,)6
  /HYHO &2/21,$/7$1 %(/0217$9(
   6$1'%/$677(;785( '$//$67;
'5<9,7
  (
 
(
5HYLVLRQV
/HYHO (,)6
(    6($6&$3( ),1(66(  &21&(376(7
60227+),1,6+
0 '5<9,7
 
( (
/HYHO (
   (,)6 GUDZQE\
0 $17+5$&,7(&2$/ ),1(66(
67 60227+),1,6+ '5<9,7

  GDWH
0
30
67$1',1*6($0
/(9(/ &233(5 6+()),(/' MREQR
0(7$/6,17(51$7,21$/
   
0 VKHHWWLWOH
67$1',1*6($0 (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216&2/25
7(55$&277$ 6+()),(/'
0(7$/6,17(51$7,21$/ VKHHWQR

0
&2/8016
&+$03$*1( 6+()),(/'
$ :(67%8,/',1*(/(9$7,21 0(7$/6,17(51$7,21$/
3   
0
3
08//,216
'$5.%521=( .$:1((5
$XWRGHVN'RFVB7DSHVWU\ +:6'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B7DSHVWU\ +RPHZRRG6XLWHV'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B59%XLOGLQJUYW




30


‹0$<6( $662&,$7(6,1&
81$87+25,=(''83/,&$7,21352+,%,7('




CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
Planning & Development
Department




(
 
/HYHO
  

6($/
5< *
0 72 ,1
0
/$ ,77 1
8 2
* 50 7,
5( 3( 8&
5 / 5
)2 $ 67
/HYHO
/HYHO 7 29 21
 
   2
1 35 &
3 5
$ 2
0
0 0
67
&21&(37
67 67
 
6(7,1
352*(66
7KLVGUDZLQJDQGDOOSULQWVRILWDUHWKH
SURSHUW\RI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV,QF
5HSURGXFWLRQVRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVZLWKRXW
WKHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV
/HYHO
/(9(/ ,QFLVQRWSHUPLWWHGDQG0D\VH 
 
   $VVRFLDWHV,QFUHWDLQVDOOFRPPRQODZDQG
VWDWXWRU\DQGRWKHUUHVHUYHGULJKWV
LQFOXGLQJWKHFRS\ULJKW




' 322/&2857<$5'(/(9$7,21
3   
(QJLQHH

U


(;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1'
67
7+,16721( ;
1257+
6$1'&$1<21
)/$*6721( &5($0 3+2(1,;1($5
86'
 -
 0"

 86'
 -
 0"

 &2521$'26721(

0 :'
0$<2&/,1,&
0
$//85$),%(5&(0(17 1WK67 (0$<2%/9'
/$36,',1*  ; 3+2(1,;$=
( 5867,&6(5,(6
(
723   723 6800(5:+($7
  :22'721(
173' 
 - 
6" 
 
173' 
- 
6"
(
72522) 72522)
(   
 
168'- 
6"  

 - 
168' 6"
 (

%2'(&. ( (,)6
%2'(&. $0(5,6721( 1257+3+2(1,;1($50$<2&/,1,&
 
  
   6('21$5('
( 


'5<9,7
/HYHO /HYHO
(      
(
(
  (   (,)6
6:+($57<
/HYHO /HYHO 25$1*( ),1(66(
60227+),1,6+
( (      
'5<9,7
(
  (   (
(,)6
  ( /HYHO   /HYHO 5()/(&7,7 +$00(5('
( (
(       &233(560227+
(
'5<9,7
( */$=,1*),1,6+/(*(1'
(     3/$=$&203$1,(6$02
(
/HYHO /HYHO 6
:7+81'(5%,5'5'
      (,)6 68,7(
63$1'5(/ &27721
$7/$17,&$63$1'5(/ 6$1'%/$677(;785( 3(25,$$5,=21$
    9,752,&'&2$7,1*6 '5<9,7


/HYHO /HYHO (
0 * )$<7++263,7$/,7<*5283//&
     
(,)6
*5$9,752 6$1'%/$677(;785(
'5<9,7
'$//$67;
  67  
67
(
/(9(/ /(9(/ * 5HYLVLRQV
      (,)6
$7/$17,&$ 6($6&$3( ),1(66(  &21&(376(7
9,752 60227+),1,6+
'5<9,7


* (
3$&,),&$ (,)6
9,752 $17+5$&,7(&2$/ ),1(66( GUDZQE\
$ ($67:,1*(/(9$7,21 $ :(67:,1*(/(9$7,21 60227+),1,6+ '5<9,7
3    3   
GDWH
0
* 30
67$1',1*6($0
%521=( &233(5 6+()),(/' MREQR
9,752 0(7$/6,17(51$7,21$/

0
VKHHWWLWOH
67$1',1*6($0
* (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216&2/25
7(55$&277$ 6+()),(/'
0(7$/6,17(51$7,21$/ VKHHWQR
237,*5$<
9,752 0
&2/8016
&+$03$*1( 6+()),(/'
* 0(7$/6,17(51$7,21$/

&/($5
9,752
0
3
08//,216
'$5.%521=( .$:1((5
$XWRGHVN'RFVB7DSHVWU\ +:6'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B7DSHVWU\ +RPHZRRG6XLWHV'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B59%XLOGLQJUYW




30


‹0$<6( $662&,$7(6,1&
81$87+25,=(''83/,&$7,21352+,%,7('




   


3(563(&7,9(9,(:66+2:1217+,66+((7
$5()25*(1(5$/,1)250$7,21$1'
5()(5(1&(21/< 127)25&216758&7,21


CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026 6($/
( (

Planning & Development 5< *
72 ,1
/$ 7 1
Department 8 0,7 ,2
5(* (5 &7
5 /3 58
)2 $ 67
7 29 21
1 35 &
3 5
$ 2




7KLVGUDZLQJDQGDOOSULQWVRILWDUHWKH
SURSHUW\RI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV,QF
5HSURGXFWLRQVRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVZLWKRXW
WKHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV
,QFLVQRWSHUPLWWHGDQG0D\VH 
$VVRFLDWHV,QFUHWDLQVDOOFRPPRQODZDQG
VWDWXWRU\DQGRWKHUUHVHUYHGULJKWV
LQFOXGLQJWKHFRS\ULJKW




' '

(QJLQHHU




1WK67 (0$<2%/9'
3+2(1,;$=




1257+3+2(1,;1($50$<2%/9'




& &




3/$=$&203$1,(6$02
:7+81'(5%,5'5'
68,7(
3(25,$$5,=21$


)$<7++263,7$/,7<*5283//&
%(/0217$9(
'$//$67;



5HYLVLRQV
 6(7




% %




GUDZQE\


GDWH
30
$ MREQR
$ 
VKHHWWLWOH

(;7(5,255(1'(5

VKHHWQR




$
30
$XWRGHVN'RFVB7DSHVWU\ +:6'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B7DSHVWU\ +RPHZRRG6XLWHV'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B59%XLOGLQJUYW




‹0$<6( $662&,$7(6,1&
    81$87+25,=(''83/,&$7,21352+,%,7('


   


3(563(&7,9(9,(:66+2:1217+,66+((7
$5()25*(1(5$/,1)250$7,21$1'
5()(5(1&(21/< 127)25&216758&7,21

CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
6($/
( (
Planning & Development
5< *
72 ,1
/$ 7 1
Department 8 0,7 ,2
5(* (5 &7
5 /3 58
)2 $ 67
7 29 21
1 35 &
3 5
$ 2




7KLVGUDZLQJDQGDOOSULQWVRILWDUHWKH
SURSHUW\RI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV,QF
5HSURGXFWLRQVRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVZLWKRXW
WKHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV
,QFLVQRWSHUPLWWHGDQG0D\VH 
$VVRFLDWHV,QFUHWDLQVDOOFRPPRQODZDQG
VWDWXWRU\DQGRWKHUUHVHUYHGULJKWV
LQFOXGLQJWKHFRS\ULJKW




' '

(QJLQHHU




1WK67 (0$<2%/9'
3+2(1,;$=




1257+3+2(1,;1($50$<2%/9'




& &




3/$=$&203$1,(6$02
:7+81'(5%,5'5'
68,7(
3(25,$$5,=21$


)$<7++263,7$/,7<*5283//&
%(/0217$9(
'$//$67;



5HYLVLRQV
 6(7




% %




GUDZQE\


GDWH
30
$ MREQR
$ 
VKHHWWLWOH

(;7(5,255(1'(5

VKHHWQR




$
30
$XWRGHVN'RFVB7DSHVWU\ +:6'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B7DSHVWU\ +RPHZRRG6XLWHV'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B59%XLOGLQJUYW




‹0$<6( $662&,$7(6,1&
    81$87+25,=(''83/,&$7,21352+,%,7('


   


3(563(&7,9(9,(:66+2:1217+,66+((7
$5()25*(1(5$/,1)250$7,21$1'
5()(5(1&(21/< 127)25&216758&7,21


CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026 6($/
( (

Planning & Development
5< *
72 ,1
/$ 7 1
8 0,7 ,2
Department (* (5 &7
5 /3 58
)2 $ 67
7 29 21
1 35 &
3 5
$ 2




7KLVGUDZLQJDQGDOOSULQWVRILWDUHWKH
SURSHUW\RI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV,QF
5HSURGXFWLRQVRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVZLWKRXW
WKHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV
,QFLVQRWSHUPLWWHGDQG0D\VH 
$VVRFLDWHV,QFUHWDLQVDOOFRPPRQODZDQG
VWDWXWRU\DQGRWKHUUHVHUYHGULJKWV
LQFOXGLQJWKHFRS\ULJKW




' '

(QJLQHHU




1WK67 (0$<2%/9'
3+2(1,;$=




1257+3+2(1,;1($50$<2%/9'




& &




3/$=$&203$1,(6$02
:7+81'(5%,5'5'
68,7(
3(25,$$5,=21$


)$<7++263,7$/,7<*5283//&
%(/0217$9(
'$//$67;



5HYLVLRQV
 6(7




% %




GUDZQE\


GDWH
30
$ MREQR
$ 
VKHHWWLWOH

(;7(5,255(1'(5

VKHHWQR




$
30
$XWRGHVN'RFVB7DSHVWU\ +:6'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B7DSHVWU\ +RPHZRRG6XLWHV'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B59%XLOGLQJUYW




‹0$<6( $662&,$7(6,1&
    81$87+25,=(''83/,&$7,21352+,%,7('


   

3(563(&7,9(9,(:66+2:1217+,66+((7
$5()25*(1(5$/,1)250$7,21$1'
5()(5(1&(21/< 127)25&216758&7,21
CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
6($/
( Planning & Development (


Department 5< *
72 ,1
/$ 7 1
8 0,7 ,2
5(* (5 &7
5 /3 58
)2 $ 67
7 29 21
1 35 &
3 5
$ 2




7KLVGUDZLQJDQGDOOSULQWVRILWDUHWKH
SURSHUW\RI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV,QF
5HSURGXFWLRQVRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVZLWKRXW
WKHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV
,QFLVQRWSHUPLWWHGDQG0D\VH 
$VVRFLDWHV,QFUHWDLQVDOOFRPPRQODZDQG
VWDWXWRU\DQGRWKHUUHVHUYHGULJKWV
LQFOXGLQJWKHFRS\ULJKW




' '

(QJLQHHU




1WK67 (0$<2%/9'
3+2(1,;$=




1257+3+2(1,;1($50$<2%/9'




& &




3/$=$&203$1,(6$02
:7+81'(5%,5'5'
68,7(
3(25,$$5,=21$


)$<7++263,7$/,7<*5283//&
%(/0217$9(
'$//$67;



5HYLVLRQV
 6(7




% %




GUDZQE\


GDWH
30
$ MREQR
$ 
VKHHWWLWOH

(;7(5,255(1'(5

VKHHWQR




$
30
$XWRGHVN'RFVB7DSHVWU\ +:6'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B7DSHVWU\ +RPHZRRG6XLWHV'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B59%XLOGLQJUYW




‹0$<6( $662&,$7(6,1&
    81$87+25,=(''83/,&$7,21352+,%,7('


   


3(563(&7,9(9,(:66+2:1217+,66+((7
$5()25*(1(5$/,1)250$7,21$1'
5()(5(1&(21/< 127)25&216758&7,21

CITY OF PHOENIX
JAN 12 2026
6($/
( (
Planning & Development
5< *
Department 72 ,1
/$ 7 1
8 0,7 ,2
5(* (5 &7
5 /3 58
)2 $ 67
7 29 21
1 35 &
3 5
$ 2




7KLVGUDZLQJDQGDOOSULQWVRILWDUHWKH
SURSHUW\RI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV,QF
5HSURGXFWLRQVRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVZLWKRXW
WKHZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI0D\VH $VVRFLDWHV
,QFLVQRWSHUPLWWHGDQG0D\VH 
$VVRFLDWHV,QFUHWDLQVDOOFRPPRQODZDQG
VWDWXWRU\DQGRWKHUUHVHUYHGULJKWV
LQFOXGLQJWKHFRS\ULJKW




' '

(QJLQHHU




1WK67 (0$<2%/9'
3+2(1,;$=




1257+3+2(1,;1($50$<2%/9'




& &




3/$=$&203$1,(6$02
:7+81'(5%,5'5'
68,7(
3(25,$$5,=21$


)$<7++263,7$/,7<*5283//&
%(/0217$9(
'$//$67;



5HYLVLRQV
 6(7




% %




GUDZQE\


GDWH
30
$ MREQR
$ 
VKHHWWLWOH

(;7(5,255(1'(5

VKHHWQR




$
30
$XWRGHVN'RFVB7DSHVWU\ +:6'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B7DSHVWU\ +RPHZRRG6XLWHV'XDO%UDQGB3KRHQL[B$=B59%XLOGLQJUYW




‹0$<6( $662&,$7(6,1&
    81$87+25,=(''83/,&$7,21352+,%,7('


From: pensandoval@gmail.com
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: Desert View Village 64th & Mayo
Date: Wednesday, November 26, 2025 11:03:34 AM



CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious     ‌


We oppose the entire rezoning of this area from residential to commercial and
apartments.   The entire corridors along 68th St, Scottsdale Rd to/from Mayo/101, and
now 56th St are being built up into commercial and apartments buildings which will
increase the traffic on streets that are not set up to handle what will be double or triple
number of vehicles all trying to get on the 101 from Scottsdale, 64th, and 56th St. in
addition to bringing the Cardinals training facility within 1 mile radius, the congestion is
already bad, and this will make it worse.
Norma and Praxedis Sandoval
Owners of 17850 N 68th St #1145




From: kbsle@aol.com
To: Griemsmann, Noel; Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: Re: New hotel proposal
Date: Monday, December 1, 2025 3:45:47 PM



CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious     ‌


Hi Noel,
I did receive the notice of the next two meetings, however I will be out of town for the
Dec. 8 Meeting.

After reviewing the latest documents, would you please add the following comments
to your neighborhood summary comments page:

1) As a resident of Paradise Ridge which will be next door to the proposed hotel, I do
not believe this is the right venue for the area with million dollar plus homes. A nice
restaurant would be a much better option for the site especially due to the additional
residences and town homes that are being built adjacent to the site. A hotel is too
transient for a family community. There already is a hotel for Mayo visitors, which is
set back and closer to the hospital, so it is likely this hotel will be filled with event
guests who have no concern of keeping a neighborhood quiet, clean and safe.

2) If the plan for the hotel does get approved, my thoughts for adjustments follow:

-the height is too high for being so close to residents homes. The lighting will be too
high for the neighborhood at night. I suggest reducing the floors to four. I just stayed
at a Hyatt Place in Flagstaff and it had four floors which made it look to fit the area
better. Is anyone considering the water usage for a 6 story hotel?
-The logo on the front top of the building doesn't fit with our desert landscape and
should be more discreet like the ASU building, showing only the ASU letters, not the
full name, and in a silver/white look which is located on the next lot.
-The company colors of the bright orange and green are again to "loud" and vivid for
the desert space of Phoenix. Just as McDonalds does not have yellow arches in
Sedona, these colors should be muted to keep the integrity of the desert landscape.
-The renderings sent did not show any landscaping but I would guess that is in the
plan, and the more the better.
-The hotel should be required to have a set maximum number of adults per room that
matches the beds. To have this become a constant churn of an overcrowded room for
our local events is inappropriate for the residents, and our police department.
-The hotel should have 24/7 security on site for the hotel and parking lot to get ahead
of issues.
-I would expect the pool to be fenced and locked for guests only.

Thank you for the opportunity to express my concerns.


Karen Batenic, Paradise Ridge resident



On Wednesday, November 19, 2025 at 12:05:47 PM MST, Griemsmann, Noel
wrote:



Karen,



Thank you for reaching out and we will add your comments to the summary report to the City for that
first meeting as well as pass them along to the developer team.



On process, the next step is our informational presentation to the Desert View Village Planning
Committee, which is scheduled for December 2nd. After that, we will have a second neighborhood
meeting, date still not firmed up yet. If you received a letter last time, you will get another. If not, please
send me your address and I will make sure you are on our mailing list.



In the interim, please let me know of any other questions. Hope to see you at one of the upcoming
meetings.



Noel J. Griemsmann, AICP ​




Sr Urban Planner

O: 602.382.6824
ngriemsmann@swlaw.com

SNELL
​& WILMER
swlaw.com [us.content.exclaimer.net] [us.content.exclaimer.net]| [us.content.exclaimer.net]LinkedIn [us.content.exclaimer.net]




From: kbsle@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2025 11:29 AM
To: Griemsmann, Noel
Subject: New hotel proposal



[EXTERNAL] kbsle@aol.com



Hi Noel,



We met at the meeting with the Paradise Ridge residents. I didn't have time to fill out the comment card but I
would like to share in writing the points of concern that I mentioned to you for your thoughts and discussions.



With the proposal for the hotel to be so close to Paradise Ridge homes, I do not think that is the best venue for
the area. A high end restaurant on the Mayo facing property would be better suited for the residents in the area to
use. We already have an influx of drunken, rowdy people coming in to town for all of the events in the area ex.
golf outing, etc. and a lower price hotel will attract more.

In addition, the drawings showed a building not considerate of the southwest landscape in architecture or colors
which is important. The height of the building is too high as well. If it was designed as a higher end boutique
hotel, I think it might be received better, or another use for the property.



Also, I haven't received any communication about meetings for residents to express their thoughts in person.
Has that been sent out or will it be coming soon?



Thank you, Karen Batenic




From: Michelle
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: 64 St & Mayo Rezoning for hotel
Date: Monday, December 29, 2025 12:53:23 PM



CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious     ‌


Hi Adrian,
I have attended a meeting that Snell & Wilmer conducted for getting the land rezoned near my
home. I realize that with Mayo Hospital expanding they want to provide short term stays for
patients and families, but this is not the place to do it. That corner backs up to my
neighborhood Paradise Ridge with single family homes. A 7 story hotel with a parking
surrounding it just isn't right. Wouldn't a 2-3 story building be more in line with what
surrounds us? Or have the builder of the the townhomes get to build out all the way to Mayo
Blvd?
Please let me know how I can be updated more about the dates and process of this rezoning?
Thank you,
Michelle Seabrook




ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-87-E-03-2
INFORMATION ONLY



Date of VPC Meeting December 2, 2025
Request From S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD)
Request To PUD PCD
Proposal Major Amendment to the Paradise Ridge PCD to allow
a hotel
Location Southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard


VPC DISCUSSION:

Agenda Item 3 (GPA-DSTV-1-25-2) and Agenda Item 4 (Z-87-E-03-2) are companion
cases and were heard together.

One member of the public registered to speak on this item.

Applicant Presentation:
Nick Wood, with Snell & Wilmer, LLP, introduced himself and provided an overview of
the site. Mr. Wood discussed the Rawhide Wash and surrounding street improvements.
Mr. Wood explained the request, noting that the PUD limits the uses and allows the
proposed height. Mr. Wood explained the General Plan Amendment request. Mr. Wood
then displayed and discussed the site plan, landscape plan, shade plan, building
elevations, and renderings.

Questions from Committee:
Vice Chair Louis Lagrave asked if the parking is above ground or below ground. Mr.
Wood responded that it is all surface parking.

Committee Member Gary Kirkilas commended the inclusion of the trail along the
wash. Committee Member Kirkilas asked if the wash would be channelized or kept in its
natural condition. Mr. Wood responded that the wash would be kept in its natural state.
Committee Member Kirkilas asked if the proposal includes green stormwater
infrastructure (GSI). Mr. Wood responded that he could ask the landscape architect if
that could be included in the project.

Chair Steven Bowser stated that the City has guidelines for GSI.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 283
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-87-E-03-2 – Information Only

Committee Member Jason Israel asked if the property is within a floodplain. Mr.
Wood displayed an aerial of the site and surrounding area, noting that the entire
surrounding area is within the AO floodplain. Mr. Wood stated that the Rawhide Wash
project would move the property into an A floodplain, which will reduce the potential
flood impacts.

Committee Member Joseph Barto asked if the Hilton brand is committed to the project
or if they are prospective. Mr. Wood responded that they are committed.

Public Comments:
Richard Manski asked what the traffic management plan is for the roads in the area to
minimize the impact for people that live in Paradise Ridge and the surrounding area.

Applicant Response:
Mr. Wood responded that a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been submitted to and
approved by the Street Transportation Department. Mr. Wood stated that the biggest
improvement the development includes would be widening both 64th Street and Mayo
Boulevard. Mr. Wood summarized what the street improvements would include.

Committee Discussion:
Chair Bowser asked for clarification that the street improvements are being built in
accordance with the approved Master Street Plan. Mr. Wood responded affirmatively.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 284
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-87-E-03-2



Date of VPC Meeting February 3, 2026
Request From S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD)
Request To PUD PCD
Proposal Major Amendment to the Paradise Ridge PCD to allow
a hotel
Location Southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 9-0


VPC DISCUSSION:

Committee Member Rick Nowell joined the meeting during this item, bringing the
quorum to nine members.

Agenda Item 3 (GPA-DSTV-1-25-2) and Agenda Item 4 (Z-87-E-03-2) are companion
cases and were heard together.

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

Staff Presentation:
Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided an overview of General Plan Amendment case GPA-
DSTV-1-25-2, including the location of the request, the existing General Plan Land Use
Map designation, and surrounding General Plan Land Use Map designations. Mr.
Zambrano noted that the GPA boundary is larger than the companion rezoning case
boundary in order to match the General Plan Land Use Map designations with the
existing zoning in the surrounding area. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff findings and
stated that staff recommends approval. Mr. Zambrano then provided an overview of
Rezoning Case No. Z-87-E-03-2, including the location of the request, surrounding land
uses and zoning, and the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation. Mr.
Zambrano provided background on the Paradise Ridge PCD, the Desert Ridge Kierland
Major Employment Corridor, and the Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan. Mr.
Zambrano summarized the PUD proposal and displayed the site plan, landscape plan,
elevations, and renderings. Mr. Zambrano stated that the request has received three
letters of opposition and summarized the concerns. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 285
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-87-E-03-2

findings and stated that staff recommends approval, subject to stipulations. Mr.
Zambrano shared the recommended stipulations and upcoming hearing schedule.

Applicant Presentation:
Nick Wood, with Snell & Wilmer LLP, introduced himself and provided context of
surrounding developments in the area. Mr. Wood noted that the wash on the east side
of the site is approximately 180 feet wide. Mr. Wood discussed the proposed General
Plan Land Use Map designation. Mr. Wood then displayed and discussed the site plan,
landscape plan, tree and shade plan, elevations, and renderings.

Questions from Committee:
Committee Member Richard Carlucci asked what the Mayo Flyover Study Area
Intergovernmental Agreement is and what the $5 million contribution will go towards,
per Stipulation 6. Mr. Wood responded that there was a point in time when Mayo
Boulevard was going to span over the Loop 101 freeway west of Tatum Boulevard,
within Superblock 8, to connect to the south side of the freeway. Mr. Wood stated that
there was a development agreement between the Arizona State Land Department and
the City of Phoenix regarding that flyover. Mr. Wood stated that they think the money
will be used for roadway infrastructure, but they are not certain. Committee Member
Carlucci asked for clarification that this funding contribution is in addition to the required
right-of-way improvements adjacent to the site. Mr. Wood responded affirmatively.

Committee Member George Birchby asked if there have been studies for the need for
hotels in the area. Mr. Wood responded that he does not know but noted that Plaza
Companies builds many hotels and they do their research on market demand. Mr.
Wood added that the proposed hotel would likely not draw away other hotels, noting
that the need for them is exponential.

Committee Member David Kollar asked if there have been any traffic studies done to
analyze the traffic patterns and traffic congestion, noting that there are multifamily
residential developments proposed to the north and south. Mr. Wood responded that
the Traffic Impact Analysis studied traffic in all directions generated from the site and
from surrounding developments. Mr. Wood stated that according to the traffic engineer,
the roadway network at full buildout will be able to handle the generated traffic.
Committee Member Kollar asked if the offsite improvements include 64th Street
expansion to Bell Road. Mr. Wood responded that the City is currently working on
obtaining federal funds in order to expand 64th Street to Bell Road, but this
development is not part of that.

Committee Member Gary Kirkilas thanked the applicant for incorporating green
stormwater infrastructure standards, water conservation standards, and using the wash
as a connection to the Reach 11 Recreation Area.

Chair Steven Bowser echoed appreciation for incorporation of water conservation
standards.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 286
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-87-E-03-2

Public Comments:
None.

Applicant Response:
None.

Committee Discussion:
Committee Member Kollar asked what fund does the money for the Mayo Flyover
Study Area Intergovernmental Agreement go to and what the funds will be used for. Mr.
Zambrano responded that the money would go into one fund and would be used in the
general area for regional transportation infrastructure improvements. Committee
Member Kollar asked what area the intergovernmental agreement applies to. Mr.
Zambrano responded that it would be applicable to the entire area surrounding where
the Mayo Boulevard flyover was located.

MOTION – Z-87-E-03-2:
Committee Member Warren made a motion to recommend approval of Z-87-E-03-2,
per the staff recommendation. Vice Chair Lagrave seconded the motion.

VOTE – Z-87-E-03-2:
9-0; the motion to recommend approval of Z-87-E-03-2, per the staff recommendation
passes with Committee Members Barto, Birchby, Carlucci, Kirkilas, Kollar, Nowell,
Warren, Lagrave and Bowser in favor.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

Staff has no comments.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 287
ATTACHMENT D




To: City of Phoenix Planning Commission Date: March 5, 2026

From: Racelle Escolar, AICP
Principal Planner

Subject: ITEM NO. 5 (Z-87-E-03-2) – SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 64TH STREET
AND MAYO BOULEVARD

Rezoning Case No. Z-87-E-03-2 is a request to rezone 8.20 acres located at the
southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard from S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD)
(Ranch or Farm Residence, Approved Commerce Park District, Business Park Option,
Planned Community District) to PUD PCD (Planned Unit Development, Planned
Community District) for the Plaza Companies Hospitality PUD for a major amendment to
the Paradise Ridge PCD to allow a hotel.

The Desert View Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on February 3,
2026 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 9-0.

On February 5, 2026, the applicant had a follow-up pre-application meeting with plan
review staff for the updated plans of this development. During this meeting, plan review
staff raised concerns with the 10-foot-wide detachment of the sidewalk becoming less
than 10 feet when adjacent to the deceleration lane along Mayo Boulevard. Per the
Street Transportation Department, the ultimate street buildout is dictated by the
approved master street plan. To address this concern, staff recommends additional
language be added to the Streetscape Standards Section of the PUD Development
Narrative to refer to the approved master street plan for the required landscape strip
width.

Staff recommends approval, per the modified stipulations in BOLD font below:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Plaza Companies Hospitality PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of
this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped January 12, 2026, as modified by the
following stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date]. Change 3rd submittal
date to December 30, 2025.

b. Page 9, C. List of Uses, C1. Permitted Uses, 1st bullet point: Delete
“Restaurants with recorded music or one musician”.

Z-87-E-03-2
Planning Commission Backup Memo
March 5, 2026

c. Pages 9 and 10, C. List of Uses, C1. Permitted Uses, 2nd bullet point:
Update the font size to be the same size. Delete the extra bullet point
below the last sub-bullet point, before the Temporary Uses section.

d. PAGE 12, D. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, D2. STREETSCAPE
STANDARDS: ADD TEXT AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE FOR
FOOTNOTE 2 WHICH STATES “PER THE APPROVED MASTER
STREET PLANS AND AS APPROVED/MODIFIED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT”.

d Pages 12 – 14, D. Development Standards, D2. Streetscape Standards, a.
e. Mayo Boulevard and b. 64th Street, Live Coverage, both bullet points for
each: Replace “maintained to a maximum height of two feet” to
“maintained to a maximum height of three feet (excluding accents)”.

e Pages 14 – 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape
f. Standards, b. North (Mayo Boulevard) through d. East (Adjacent to Wash),
Live Coverage, both bullet points for each: Replace “maintained to a
maximum height of two feet” with “maintained to a maximum height of
three feet (excluding accents)”.

f Page 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape Standards,
g. e, South (Perimeter): Replace with “Trees: Minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, drought-tolerant, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in
equivalent groupings. Live Coverage: A mixture of drought-tolerant shrubs,
accents, and vegetative groundcovers, evenly distributed throughout the
landscape areas to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage”.

g Page 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape Standards,
h. f. Parking Lot Landscaping: Replace “maintained to a maximum height of
two feet” with “maintained to a maximum height of three feet (excluding
accents)”.

h Pages 17 – 18, D. Development Standards, D5. Fences/Walls: Start the
i. fourth sentence as a new paragraph. After this paragraph, add “An
architectural archway over 40 inches tall shall be permitted within the
building/landscape setback when provided over a pedestrian pathway
connecting from the public sidewalk to the development”.

i Page 18, D. Development Standards, D7. Lighting, 2nd paragraph:
j. Replace with “Pedestrian lighting shall be provided along the public
sidewalks adjacent to 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard, along the wash
pathway, and along private internal pedestrian pathways, as follows:”.

j Exhibits: Revise exhibits to remove parking overhang and the south
k. retaining wall from impeding in the required south landscape setback.

Z-87-E-03-2
Planning Commission Backup Memo
March 5, 2026

2. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AO, on panels
04013C 1315L of Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) with an effective date of
October 16, 2013. The following requirements shall apply, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

a. The Architect and Engineer are required to show the floodplain boundary
limits on the Site Plan and Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that
impacts to the proposed facilities are adequately addressed, following
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph
60.3). This includes, but is not limited to, provisions in the latest versions of
the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of the Office of the City Engineer for
review and approval of floodplain requirements.

c. Conditions for Grading and Drainage permit and Building permit:

(1) Final Grading and Drainage plans must receive approval from
Floodplain Management prior to issuance of a Grading and
Drainage permit and a Building permit.

(2) An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on Finished
Grading and Drainage and construction plans for each structure,
must be submitted to and approved by Floodplain Management prior
to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit and a Building permit.

d. Conditions for building permit (prior to issuance of vertical construction):

(1) An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on the
building under construction, must be submitted to and approved by
Floodplain Management prior to issuance of vertical construction.

(2) Compaction test results demonstrating 95% compaction for building
pads must be provided prior to issuance of vertical construction.

e. Conditions for certificate of occupancy (C of O):

(1) An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on finished
construction, must be submitted to and approved by Floodplain
Management prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

(2) An as-built plan review shall confirm that elevations shown on the
plans correspond with those documented in the Elevation Certificate
based on finished construction.



Z-87-E-03-2
Planning Commission Backup Memo
March 5, 2026

3. A bus pad on eastbound Mayo Boulevard that conforms with City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1260 shall be constructed. The pad shall be located from 64th
Street according to P1258. The bus pad must be located within the public right-of-
way or within a transit easement that the developer dedicates.

4. A minimum of 70 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the south half of Mayo
Boulevard, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th & E. Mayo Blvd.

5. A minimum of 70 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the east half of 64th
Street to its ultimate condition, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th
St. & E. Mayo Blvd.

6. A total of $5,000,000 in regional funding through ASLD shall be paid, due at the
release of grading and drainage permits, in accordance with the Mayo Flyover
Study Area Intergovernmental Agreement approved by City Council on December
7, 2022.

7. Reconstruction of the interim traffic signal at the intersection of 64th Street and
Mayo Boulevard shall be fully funded and constructed with the first phase of
development, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th St. & E. Mayo
Blvd.

8. Unless already constructed by others, the ultimate 100-year storm event box
culvert dry crossing of Mayo Boulevard east of 64th Street shall be constructed to
its full limits, including construction of the upstream and downstream
maintenance access ramps.

9. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in
the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 10, 2025.

10. Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets shall
be replaced and all off-site improvements shall be upgraded to be in compliance
with current ADA guidelines.

11. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

12. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.



Z-87-E-03-2
Planning Commission Backup Memo
March 5, 2026

13. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

14. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

15. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

PCD Stipulations

16. Master Plan documents shall be submitted for portions of the Planned
Community District as development occurs, per the applicable development
agreement.

17. Right-of-way and improvements shall be determined by the final Traffic Impact
Study and a Master Street Plan – Development Agreement between the city,
Arizona State Land Department, and the City of Scottsdale. Additional right-of-
way and/or easements not specifically identified such as bus bays, turn lanes,
landscape/sidewalk easements, slope and construction easements, etc., may be
required as determined by the Master Street Plan, or when individual
development plans are submitted to the Planning and Development Department
for approval.

18. Detailed requirements for potable water, wastewater, and reclaimed water on-site
and off-site infrastructure needed to service this project and infrastructure
phasing schedules shall be determined at the time of review and approval of the
PCD potable water, wastewater, and reclaimed water master plans. Off-site
infrastructure requirements shall be a function of the amount of major master plan
water and sewer lines constructed by other development in the area prior to
initiation of this project.




ATTACHMENT E

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
MARCH 5, 2026

ITEM NO: 5
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-87-E-03-2 (Companion Case GPA-DSTV-1-25-2)
(Plaza Companies Hospitality PUD)
Location: Southeast corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard
From: S-1 (Approved CP/BP PCD)
To: PUD PCD
Acreage: 8.20
Proposal: Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow a hotel and commercial uses
Applicant: Jonathan Stelzer, The Plaza Companies
Owner: Jonathan Stelzer, The Plaza Companies
Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer LLP

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 12/2/2025 Information only.
Desert View 2/3/2026 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote 9-0.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Staff Memo dated March 5, 2026.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approved Z-87-E-03-2, per the
Staff Memo dated March 5, 2026.

Maker: Matthews
Second: James
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Busching, Jaramillo
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposal is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation
(GPA-DSTV-1-25-2) and the character of the surrounding area.

2. The proposal will facilitate new commercial development at an appropriate location,
contributing to the land use mix in the area.

3. The proposed PUD supports efforts from various plans, policies, and
initiatives, including the Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan, the Comprehensive
Bicycle Master Plan, the Complete Streets Design Guidelines, the Zero Waste PHX
initiative, the Monarch Butterfly Pledge initiative, the Phoenix Climate Action Plan, the
Transportation Electrification Action Plan, the Conservation Measures for New
Development policy, and the Shade Phoenix Plan.

Stipulations:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Plaza Companies Hospitality PUD reflecting
the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development Narrative date
stamped January 12, 2026, as modified by the following stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date]. Change 3rd submittal date to
December 30, 2025.

b. Page 9, C. List of Uses, C1. Permitted Uses, 1st bullet point: Delete “Restaurants
with recorded music or one musician”.

c. Pages 9 and 10, C. List of Uses, C1. Permitted Uses, 2nd bullet point: Update the
font size to be the same size. Delete the extra bullet point below the last sub-bullet
point, before the Temporary Uses section.

d. PAGE 12, D. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, D2. STREETSCAPE STANDARDS:
ADD TEXT AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE FOR FOOTNOTE 2 WHICH
STATES “PER THE APPROVED MASTER STREET PLANS AND AS
APPROVED/MODIFIED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT”.

d. Pages 12 – 14, D. Development Standards, D2. Streetscape Standards, a. Mayo
e. Boulevard and b. 64th Street, Live Coverage, both bullet points for each: Replace
“maintained to a maximum height of two feet” to “maintained to a maximum height
of three feet (excluding accents)”.

e. Pages 14 – 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape Standards,
f. b. North (Mayo Boulevard) through d. East (Adjacent to Wash), Live Coverage,
both bullet points for each: Replace “maintained to a maximum height of two feet”
with “maintained to a maximum height of three feet (excluding accents)”.

f. Page 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape Standards, e,
g. South (Perimeter): Replace with “Trees: Minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy,
drought-tolerant, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.
Live Coverage: A mixture of drought-tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative
groundcovers, evenly distributed throughout the landscape areas to achieve a
minimum of 75% live coverage”.

g. Page 16, D. Development Standards, D3. Minimum Landscape Standards, f.
h. Parking Lot Landscaping: Replace “maintained to a maximum height of two feet”
with “maintained to a maximum height of three feet (excluding accents)”.

h. Pages 17 – 18, D. Development Standards, D5. Fences/Walls: Start the fourth
i. sentence as a new paragraph. After this paragraph, add “An architectural archway
over 40 inches tall shall be permitted within the building/landscape setback when
provided over a pedestrian pathway connecting from the public sidewalk to the
development”.




i. Page 18, D. Development Standards, D7. Lighting, 2nd paragraph: Replace with
j. “Pedestrian lighting shall be provided along the public sidewalks adjacent to 64th
Street and Mayo Boulevard, along the wash pathway, and along private internal
pedestrian pathways, as follows:”.

j. Exhibits: Revise exhibits to remove parking overhang and the south retaining wall
k. from impeding in the required south landscape setback.

2. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AO, on panels
04013C 1315L of Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) with an effective date of October
16, 2013. The following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

a. The Architect and Engineer are required to show the floodplain boundary limits on
the Site Plan and Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that impacts to the
proposed facilities are adequately addressed, following National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3). This includes, but is not
limited to, provisions in the latest versions of the Floodplain Ordinance of the
Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the Floodplain
Management section of the Office of the City Engineer for review and approval of
floodplain requirements.

c. Conditions for Grading and Drainage permit and Building permit:

1. Final Grading and Drainage plans must receive approval from Floodplain
Management prior to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit and a
Building permit.

2. An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on Finished Grading
and Drainage and construction plans for each structure, must be submitted to
and approved by Floodplain Management prior to issuance of a Grading and
Drainage permit and a Building permit.

d. Conditions for building permit (prior to issuance of vertical construction):

1. An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on the building under
construction, must be submitted to and approved by Floodplain Management
prior to issuance of vertical construction.

2. Compaction test results demonstrating 95% compaction for building pads
must be provided prior to issuance of vertical construction.

e. Conditions for certificate of occupancy (C of O):

1. An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33), based on finished
construction, must be submitted to and approved by Floodplain Management
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

2. An as-built plan review shall confirm that elevations shown on the plans
correspond with those documented in the Elevation Certificate based on
finished construction.

3. A bus pad on eastbound Mayo Boulevard that conforms with City of Phoenix Standard
Detail P1260 shall be constructed. The pad shall be located from 64th Street according
to P1258. The bus pad must be located within the public right-of-way or within a transit
easement that the developer dedicates.

4. A minimum of 70 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the south half of Mayo
Boulevard, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th & E. Mayo Blvd.

5. A minimum of 70 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the east half of 64th Street to
its ultimate condition, per the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th St. & E. Mayo
Blvd.

6. A total of $5,000,000 in regional funding through ASLD shall be paid, due at the release
of grading and drainage permits, in accordance with the Mayo Flyover Study Area
Intergovernmental Agreement approved by City Council on December 7, 2022.

7. Reconstruction of the interim traffic signal at the intersection of 64th Street and Mayo
Boulevard shall be fully funded and constructed with the first phase of development, per
the approved Master Street Plan for N. 64th St. & E. Mayo Blvd.

8. Unless already constructed by others, the ultimate 100-year storm event box culvert dry
crossing of Mayo Boulevard east of 64th Street shall be constructed to its full limits,
including construction of the upstream and downstream maintenance access ramps.

9. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in the
accepted Traffic Impact Analysis dated January 10, 2025.

10. Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, any broken or
out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets shall be replaced and
all off-site improvements shall be upgraded to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

11. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with paving, curb,
gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping, and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

12. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall conduct
Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the development
area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to clearing and grubbing,
landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

13. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the Phase I
data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified archaeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct
Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

14. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the developer
shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius of the
discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office to
properly assess the materials.




15. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 waiver of
claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder's Office
and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file for record.

PCD Stipulations

16. Master Plan documents shall be submitted for portions of the Planned Community
District as development occurs, per the applicable development agreement.

17. Right-of-way and improvements shall be determined by the final Traffic Impact Study
and a Master Street Plan – Development Agreement between the city, Arizona State
Land Department, and the City of Scottsdale. Additional right-of-way and/or easements
not specifically identified such as bus bays, turn lanes, landscape/sidewalk easements,
slope and construction easements, etc., may be required as determined by the Master
Street Plan, or when individual development plans are submitted to the Planning and
Development Department for approval.

18. Detailed requirements for potable water, wastewater, and reclaimed water on-site and
off-site infrastructure needed to service this project and infrastructure phasing schedules
shall be determined at the time of review and approval of the PCD potable water,
wastewater, and reclaimed water master plans. Off-site infrastructure requirements shall
be a function of the amount of major master plan water and sewer lines constructed by
other development in the area prior to initiation of this project.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Saneeya Mir at 602-686-6461, saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.







Report