View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text

***REQUEST TO CONTINUE (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** (CONTINUED FROM
MARCH 3, 2021) - Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Amend City Code -
Rezoning Application Z-56-20-4 - Southeast Corner of 3rd Avenue and Coolidge
Street (Ordinance G-6818)

Request to hold a public hearing on a proposal to amend the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning
Application Z-56-20-4 and rezone the site from R-3 (Multifamily Residence District)
and R-5 (Multifamily Residence District) to WU Code T5:5 UT (Walkable Urban Code,
Transect 5:5 District, Transit Uptown Character Area) for multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) (0.18-acres) and R-5 (Multifamily
Residence District) (3.11 acres)
Proposed Zoning: WU Code T5:5 UT (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 5:5 District,
Transit Uptown Character Area)
Acreage: 3.29 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Owner: Donor Network of Arizona
Applicant: Trinsic Residential Group, Todd Gosselink
Representative: Withey Morris, PLC, Jason Morris

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Alhambra Village Planning Committee heard this case on Jan. 26,
2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 15-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Feb. 4, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Alhambra Village Planning Committee
recommendation with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 7-1.
The Planning Commission recommendation was appealed on Feb. 10, 2021 and a
petition for a 3/4 vote was submitted on Feb. 11, 2021. A 3/4 vote is required.

Location
Southeast corner of 3rd Avenue and Coolidge Street
Council District: 4

Page 299

Parcel Addresses: 201 W. Coolidge St.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.

Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(Z-56-20-4) FROM R-3 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT)
AND R-5 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO WU CODE
T5:5 UT (WALKABLE URBAN CODE, TRANSECT 5:5 DISTRICT,
TRANSIT UPTOWN CHARACTER AREA).

____________

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 3.29-acre property located at the southeast

corner of 3rd Avenue and Coolidge Street, in a portion of Section 20, Township 2 North,

Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from

0.18-acres of “R-3” (Multifamily Residence District) and 3.11 acres of “R-5” (Multifamily

Residence District) to “WU Code T5:5 UT” (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 5:5 District,

Transit Uptown Character Area).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

Page 304
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The south facing mass of the building(s) oriented to the Grand Canal shall
incorporate Walkable Urban Code Frontage Types described in Section 1305
for a minimum 40 percent of the building face(s), as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. For the purpose applying the above provisions,
the above shall be treated as a Secondary Frontage with regard to glazing.

2. The south facing mass of the building(s) oriented to the Grand Canal shall
contain architectural embellishments, design detailing, and / or space
programming to activate and provide visual access onto the canal, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Examples of
appropriate enhancements may include textural changes, offsets, recesses,
variation in window size and location, overhang canopies, balconies with a
depth greater of than 3 feet, and amenities such as gathering spaces.

3. Between the southern mass of the building and the south property line (the
Grand Canal right-of-way), the developer shall plant minimum 3-inch caliper,
large canopy shade trees, at a minimum frequency of 25 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.

4. The provisions of Section 1310.A.2. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance shall
apply to require shaded open space of which a minimum 50 percent shall be
situated adjacent to the south property line (the Grand Canal right-of-way), as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

5. No solid perimeter wall greater than 36 inches in height shall be oriented to
and located within 30 feet of the south property line (the Grand Canal right-of-
way), as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6. The developer shall provide traffic calming to slow vehicle traffic exiting the
property with specific regard to pedestrian safety on the public sidewalk, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. The developer shall provide a minimum of two direct and accessible
pedestrian connections from the amenity areas located south of the building
mass to the shared use path along the Grand Canal Trail, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

Page 305
8. The developer shall provide and maintain the following bicycle infrastructure
as described below and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. A bicycle repair station (fix-it station) along the southern edge
of the site, visible, and accessible from the public sidewalk and
/ or the Grand Canal Trail. The station shall include but not
limited to: standard repair tools affixed to the station; a tire
gauge and pump; and a bicycle repair stand which allows
pedals and wheels to spin freely while adjusting the bike.

b. All required bicycle parking for multifamily use, per Section
1307.H.6.d. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be
secured parking.

c. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be
provided at a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit with a
maximum of 50 spaces near entrances of buildings and
installed per the requirements of Section 1306.H. of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

9. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

10. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone A, on panel
1740 L of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated October 16, 2013.
The following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain
boundary limits on the Grading and Drainage plan and ensure
that impacts to the proposed facilities have been considered,
following the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3); this includes, but not
limited to provisions in the latest versions of the Floodplain
Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to
the Floodplain Management section of Public Works
Department for review and approval of Floodplain
requirements.

c. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved CLOMR-F or
CLOMR prior to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit.

Page 306
11. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

12. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

13. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for
the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

14. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of March 2021.

________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

____________________________City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Page 307
____________________________City Attorney

REVIEWED BY:

____________________________City Manager

Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)

Page 308
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-56-20-4

A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CALCULATED CENTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION
20, BEING THE INTERSECTION OF CENTRAL AVENUE AND CAMPBELL
AVENUE AS REFERENCED IN THE MONUMENT CORNER TIES FOR LINE
SECTION 2 CENTRAL PHOENIX LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT, IN
DOCUMENT 2009-0003295, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, ALONG
THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20,
A DISTANCE OF 1,318.52 FEET TO A CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAP
FLUSH “RLS 39131” MARKING THE CENTERLINE OF 3RD AVENUE AND
CAMPBELL AVENUE;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, ALONG
THE CENTERLINE OF SAID 3RD AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 564.11 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 20 SECONDS
WEST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 416.71 FEET TO THE
CENTERLINE OF 3RD AVENUE AND COOLIDGE STREET, BEING SOUTH
1.69 FEET AND 3.40 FEET OF TWO CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAPS;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST, ALONG
THE CENTERLINE OF SAID COOLIDGE STREET A DISTANCE OF 358.31
FEET, BEING 966.10 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CENTRAL
AVENUE AND COOLIDGE STREET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 348.85, FEET DEPARTING SAID COOLIDGE STREET, ALONG
THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL 1 OF THAT SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
RECORDED IN 2001-0882094, AND THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION
THEREOF, TO A POINT 25 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE
OF SAID PARCEL 1, MEASURED AT 90 DEGREES;
THENCE ALONG A 25 FOOT SOUTHERLY OFFSET OF THE SOUTH LINES
FOR LOTS 15, 17 AND 19 OF ‘SUBURBAN ACRES’ AS RECORDED IN
BOOK 13, PAGE 22 RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
SOUTH 72 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST, DISTANCE OF
65.89 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY OFFSET, SOUTH 74
DEGREES 12 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 147.10 FEET;

Page 309
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY OFFSET, SOUTH 78
DEGREES 50 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 123.95 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 142,789 SQUARE FEET OR 3.278 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.

Page 310
Page 311
$WWDFKPHQW%

Staff Report Z-56-20-4
January , 2021

Alhambra Village Planning Committee January 26, 2021
Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 4, 2021
Request From: R-3 (Multifamily Residence District)
(0.18 acres) and R-5 (Multifamily
Residence District) (3.11 acres)
Request To: WU Code T5:5 UT (Walkable Urban
Code, Transect 5:5, Uptown Character
Area) (3.29 acres)
Proposed Use: Multifamily Residential
Location: Southeast corner of 3rd Avenue and
Coolidge Street
Owner: Donor Network of Arizona

Applicant: Trinsic Residential Group, Todd
Gosselink
Representative: Withey Morris PLC, Jason Morris

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

General Plan Conformity

Residential 15+
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
Dwelling Units Per Acre

Local Varies from 30 to 40
3rd Avenue
Street foot east half street
Street Map
Classification
Local Varies from 25 to 30
Coolidge Street
Street foot south half street

Page 312
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND
USE PRINCIPLE: Promote and encourage compatible development and
redevelopment with a mix of housing types in neighborhoods close to
employment centers, commercial areas, and where transit or transportation
alternatives exist.
The development, as proposed, will create new housing opportunities in the area and
within close proximity to a light rail station, the educational facilities, and the North
Central Avenue Employment Center, especially via the Grand Canal Multiuse Trail.

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; COMPLETE STREETS;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Locate parking to the rear of a site to create a more
pedestrian environment, when adequate shielding from noise and light can be
provided to adjacent established neighborhoods. On-street parking in some
areas may also promote a pedestrian environment.
The development, as required by provisions of the Walkable Urban Code, will situate
buildings to frame the street environment with vehicle parking lots situated at the
interior of the site and to allow for the creation of a comfortable pedestrian
environment along the public streets. Further, the development, as stipulated, will
screen parking from the Grand Canal and its multiuse trail.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREE AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The development, as stipulated, will create an attractive streetscape with detached
and shaded sidewalks. The shade incorporated into the development along its
frontages will reduce the urban heat island effect and increase thermal comfort which
will make the area more walkable, bikeable, and sustainable.

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; DESIGN
PRINCIPLE: Development should include convenient bicycle parking.
The development, as stipulated, includes bicycle parking and bicycle facilities as a
central component of the project to facilitate bicycling as a way of life. Features
include secure bicycle parking for residents, convenient racks for guests, and a
bicycle repair station situated as a public amenity; together, these features will
complement the Grand Canal and its multiuse trail.

Page 313
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; CANALS AND TRAILS;
LAND USE PRINCIPLES: Plan, design, and develop pedestrian linkages
between parks, open spaces, village cores, neighborhood shopping centers,
neighborhood schools, and neighboring municipalities.
The subject site is immediately adjacent to the Grand Canal which recently was
improved through the Canalscape Project and provides regional connectivity, direct
connections to Phoenix Central High School, the Phoenix Coding Academy, Xavier
&ROOHJH3UHSDUDWRU\, Brophy &ROOHJH3UHSDUDWRU\, Steele Indian School Park, and
access to Central Avenue and the rail. The development, as stipulated, will add
vitality to this section of the Grand Canal and its multiuse trail as a community asset.

Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives

Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy Framework: Background Item No.
5.
Uptown Transit Oriented Development Policy Plan: Background Item No. 6.
Tree and Shade Master Plan: Background Item No. 9.
Complete Streets Guidelines: Background Item No. 10.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: Background Item No. 11.
Housing Phoenix: Background Item No. 12.
Reimagine Phoenix: Background Item No. 13.

Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Office R-3 and R-5
East Multifamily R-5
North (across Coolidge
Various residential R-3 and R-5
Street
South (across the
Multifamily R-4
Grand Canal)
West Single-family residential R-3

Page 314
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

Walkable Urban Code
Transect 5:5 UT
Provisions on the
Standards Requirements
Proposed Site Plan
Gross Acreage No minimum 3.29
Total Number of Units No maximum 218 units
Density No maximum 66.26
Building Height 56 foot maximum 56 feet (Met)
Parking Structure Height Cannot exceed building height 58 feet (Not Met*)
Streetscape Standards (Section 1312.E)
Minor Collector and Local Minimum sidewalk width: 5 feet 5 feet (Met)
Streets Minimum landscape width: 5 5 feet (Met)
feet (if no public utility conflict)
Main Building Setbacks
Primary Frontage (Coolidge 12 foot maximum Varies but less than
Street) 12 feet (Met)
Secondary Frontage (3rd 10 foot maximum 10 feet (Met)
Avenue)
Non Street (South and East) 0 foot minimum 15 feet and 10 feet
respectively (Met)
Parking Setbacks
Primary Frontage 30 foot minimum or behind Behind building
building (Met)
Secondary Frontage 20 foot minimum with a 10 foot Behind building
landscape setback measured (Met)
from the street right of way
Rear (West) 0 foot minimum Behind building
(Met)
Lot Requirements
Lot Coverage 80 percent maximum 73 percent (Met
Primary Building Frontage 70 percent minimum 94 percent (Met)
Secondary Building Frontage 50 percent minimum 83 percent (Met)

Page 315
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

Walkable Urban Code
Transect 5:6 UT (Cont.)
Provisions on the
Standards Requirements
Proposed Site Plan
Frontage Types Allowed
Primary Frontage All frontages or alternative Storefront and
(Coolidge Street) frontages as per Section Stoop / Doorwell,
1305.B.1.c Met)
Secondary Frontage All frontages or alternative Stoop / Doorwell,
(3rd Avenue) frontages as per Section Met)
1305.B.1.c
Entry Requirements Common Entry: minimum one Not provided.
per 50 feet of primary building
frontage and one per 80 feet of
secondary frontage.

Other frontages as per Table
1305.1
Glazing Requirements Ground floor and second floor Not provided.
T4 standards apply for 25 percent minimum.
multifamily
Second floor (east and west):
10 percent minimum

Upper floors: not applicable
*Site plan adjustment required

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 3.29 acres at the southeast corner of 3rd Avenue and
Coolidge Street from R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) and R-5 (Multifamily
Residence District) to WU Code T5:5 UT (Walkable Urban Code Transect 5:5,
Uptown Character Area).

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
2. The proposed zoning of WU Code T5:5 UT (Walkable Urban Code Transect 5:5,
Uptown Character Area) permits a maximum height of 56 feet. The site is
currently developed with an office building. The Zoning Context Map depicts the
zoning entitlements of the subject site and the surrounding area.

Page 316
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

East: Immediately east of Title: Zoning Context Map
the subject site is a
multifamily complex which
is zoned R-5 (Multifamily
Residence District). The
zoning permits a maximum
height of 48 feet but the
existing buildings do not
exceed three stories in
height.

West: West of the subject
site across 3rd Avenue are
residential structures of a Source: Planning and Development Department
single-story and single
-family detached character. The R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) zoning
permits a maximum height of 30 feet by right, and up to 48 feet with increased
setbacks.

North: North of the subject site across Coolidge Street are various residential
structures ranging from a single-family detached character to small apartment
complex, with neither type exceeding two stories. The approximate west half of
sites immediately north of the subject site are zoned R-3 (Multifamily Residence
District) which permits a maximum height of 30 feet by right, and up to 48 feet
with increased setbacks, and the remaining sites to the east are zoned R-5
(Multifamily Residence District) which permits a maximum height of 48 feet.

South (the Grand Canal): South of the subject site is the Grand Canal which
was recently improved through the Canalscape project which brought lighting,
landscaping, and seating improvements to this section of the canal.

South (beyond the Grand Canal): South of the subject site across the Grand
Canal is a multifamily community zoned R-4 (Multifamily Residence District)
which permits a maximum height of 48 feet.

3. Located along Central Avenue and several properties east of the subject site is
the Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay District One (TOD-1). The primary
purpose of TOD-1 was to encourage an appropriate mixture and density of
activity around transit stations to increase ridership along the light rail corridor
and promote alternative modes of transportation to the automobile while the
Walkable Urban Code was developed.

Page 317
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP
4. The General Plan Title: General Plan Land Use Map Excerpt
Land Use Map
depicts a land use
designation of
Residential 15+
dwelling units per
acre which is
consistent with the
density proposed.

Surrounding the
subject site are
designations for
multifamily
densities including Source: Planning and Development Department
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre to the south and east and Residential 10
to 15 dwelling units per acre to the north and west. The proposed use and
density of the subject site is consistent with the surrounding context.

5. The Encanto Village Character Plan was approved and adopted in the Phoenix
General Plan through General Plan Amendment GPA-1-19. Each of the 15
Urban Villages have a Character Plan.

The proposed project advances the following items identified in the Encanto
Village Character Plan: encourage growth along the light rail; integrating canals
into project design; and new development being consistent with adopted plans.

One such area of alignment is with the North Central Employment Center
(profile attached) which identifies the presence of approximately 770,000 young,
well-educated, workers within a 10 to 20 minute drive and projected growth of
170,000 new residents within a 30 minute drive. The proposed development will
provide housing opportunities for the growing population in proximity to the
growing employment center while also reducing the need for long vehicle
commutes.

Page 318
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

6. Transit Oriented Title: Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy
Development Strategic Framework Place Type Map
Policy Framework:
The Transit Oriented
Development Strategic Policy
Framework is part of the
City’s General Plan. The
framework identifies planning
typologies to describe urban
environments in terms of
appropriate scale and
intensity

As depicted on the right, the
subject site is located within
one-quarter mile from two
light rail stations. The nearest
station, Central and
Campbell, is identified in the
Strategic Policy Framework
as a Minor Urban Center Source: Planning and Development Department
Place Type.

The Minor Urban Center Place Type is characterized by two to five story
buildings with allowances for up to seven when incentive criteria are met or
when a special circumstance exists. The proposed development, using the
Walkable Urban Code and depicting a height of four stories, is consistent with
the Minor Urban Center Place Type.

7. Uptown Transit Oriented Development Policy Plan:
The subject site is located within the Uptown TOD Planning Area which is
depicted on the following page. The policy plan adopted for the Uptown TOD
District provides a blueprint for fully achieving the transformative potential of
light rail in a sustainable manner. Changes advocated in the plan can lower
transportation costs for residents, create new business opportunities, encourage
active, healthy lifestyles, ensure Phoenix increases its competitive advantage in
the global marketplace, and improve prosperity by growing the economy in
locations with existing infrastructure and public services.

Page 319
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

While the subject site is Title: Uptown TOD Planning Area
not mapped for a specific
recommended transect for
redevelopment, the
Uptown TOD District Plan
provides the following
direction relevant to the
subject site:

Activating the Grand
Canalscape:
The Uptown TOD Plan
describes at length the
importance and
opportunity of embracing
the Grand Canal as an
open space amenity, as a
regional active Source: Planning and Development Department
transportation trail, and as
waterfront. While the Canalscape Project is complete, it is the projects adjacent
to the Grand Canal that will enliven the waterfront.

Increase the Population Using Alternative Transportation: .
The Uptown TOD Plan includes several measurable outcomes focused on
increasing ridership on the light rail, increasing the number of individuals riding
bikes or walking to work, and decreasing the number of Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT). The proposed project will position new households within walking and
bicycling distance to jobs, schools, and major park facilities.

PROPOSAL
8. Site Plan
As depicted on the conceptual site plans and elevations on the following pages,
the proposal is for four floors of housing with five levels of parking located at the
interior of the site. The site plan depicts one point of vehicular access from
Coolidge Street. The site plan depicts 218 dwelling units with 46 studios, 116
one-bedroom, and 56 two-bedroom units. At a rate of 1.3 parking spaces per
studio and 1.5 spaces per one and two bedroom units, the code would require
318 parking spaces but due to the proximity to light rail, a 10 percent reduction
is applied for a total of 287 spaces.

Page 320
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

Title: Conceptual Site Plan

Source: Rich Barber Architects

The ground floor units fronting 3rd Avenue and Coolidge Street will employ
stoop and doorwell frontages and the main leasing area oriented to Coolidge
Street will employ a storefront frontage; these ground level treatments abide by
the intent of the Walkable Urban Code to active the street frontage in addition to
detached sidewalks and trees planted between the curb and sidewalk as
required by the Walkable Urban Code.

The conceptual site plan depicts frontage types along the southern face of the

Page 321
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

building mass to activate the interface with the canal. Staff is recommending
Stipulation No. 1 to require the frontage types along 40 percent of the canal
oriented building frontage.

9. Canal Interface
The conceptual site plan and building elevations depict measures intended to
embrace and activate the frontage to the Grand Canal including amenity areas,
common areas, bike racks, a bicycle repair station, vegetation, and a perimeter
wall comprised mostly of view fence for ground level transparency. The Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance governs canal interface through the design standards
contained in Section 507 Tab A.

To advance the intent of the design guidelines and the Walkable Urban Code,
staff is recommending a series of stipulations to provide additional specificity
regarding improvements to the area between the southern mass of the building
and the Grand Canal right-of-way including the following:

x Stipulation No. 1: To require Walkable Urban Code Frontage Types along
a minimum 50 percent of the canal-facing building façade.
x Stipulation No. 2: To require architectural enhancements along the canal-
facing building façade.
x Stipulation No. 3: To require large canopy shade trees to soften the canal
environment and provide thermal comfort in the amenity areas and near
the canal.
o Due to the presence of an SRP easement at this location, the
extent to which the developer will be allowed to improve this are is
unknown and, therefore, the stipulation contains the language “as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.
x Stipulation No. 4: To require shaded open space adjacent to the canal
right-of-way through the application of Section 1310.A.2 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance.
o Due to the presence of an SRP easement at this location, the
extent to which the developer will be allowed to improve this are is
unknown and, therefore, the stipulation contains the language “as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.
x Stipulation No. 5: To require all walls and fences within 30 feet and
oriented-to the canal right-of-way to have a maximum opaque height of
36 inches to promote interface between the project and the canal
amenity.

Page 322
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

10. Conceptual Elevations
The conceptual building elevations, pictured below, depict a four story
multifamily complex exhibiting modern design elements, multiple colors, building
articulation, shaded upper floor balconies, and a mix of ground floor frontage
treatments including stoops, doorwells, and storefronts.

Title: Conceptual Building Elevations

Source: Rich Barber Architects

Page 323
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

STUDIES AND POLICIES
11. Tree and Shade Master Plan:
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached
from the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to
provide thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island
effect.

The Walkable Urban Code contains landscape standards to provide enhanced
tree plantings with a focus on thermal comfort and the conceptual site plan
complies with code requirements.

To require tree shade be integrated into the project between the southern
building mass and the Grand Canal right-of-way, staff is recommending
Stipulation No. 3 requiring large canopy shade trees, placed 20 feet on center or
in equivalent groupings, and with a minimum caliper of 3-inches at installation;
the purpose of this stipulation is to promote thermal comfort for the amenity
areas and along the Grand Canal.

12. Complete Streets Guidelines:
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. The Walkable Urban Code contains
requirements for detached sidewalks with vegetative shade which will enhance
the thermal comfort and sense of security for pedestrians passing on adjacent
sidewalks.

Staff is recommending Stipulation No. 8 to require enhanced bicycle facilities on
the site including secure bicycle parking for residents, bicycle racks for guests,
and a publicly accessible bicycle repair station near the southern edge of the
site; the purpose of these stipulations is to complement 3rd Avenue which is
identified as the Phoenix Sonoran Bikeway and the Grand Canal multiuse trail
which provides regional trail connectivity.

13. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan:
The Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan is a guide for creating a culture and
environment conducive to bicycling as a viable mode of transportation. The
proximity to high capacity transit underscores the importance of walking and
bicycling in this area.

Page 324
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

Recognizing the presence of the Grand Canal, the recently completed
Canalscape investments, the presence of the Phoenix Sonoran Bikeway, and
proximity to high capacity transit, staff is recommending Stipulation No. 8 which
requires secure bicycle parking for residents, bicycle parking for guests, and a
publicly accessible bicycle repair station.

14. Housing Phoenix:
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan.
This Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of
housing with the vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through
increased housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes.
Phoenix’s rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a
need for over 163,000 new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply
relative to demand are a primary reason why housing costs are increasing.

The proposed development supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating
50,000 housing units by 2030 by contributing to a variety housing types that will
address the supply shortage at a more rapid pace while using vacant or
underutilized land in a more sustainable fashion.

15. Zero Waste PHX:
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a
goal to become a zero waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050
Environmental Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this
is to improve and expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs.
Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to
encourage the provision of recycling containers for multifamily, commercial and
mixed-use developments meeting certain criteria. The provision of recycling
containers was not addressed in the applicant’s submittals.

COMMUNITY CORRESONDENCE
16. As of the writing of this report, one letter of opposition was received detailing
concerns relating to scale, privacy, traffic, the abundance of multifamily, and the
design compatibility with the historic district.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
17. The Fire Department commented that the site plan must comply with the
Phoenix Fire Code and further indicated there are no problems anticipated with
the case. Further, the Department commented that they do not know the water
supply at this site and noted that additional water supply may be required to
meet the required fire flow per the Phoenix Fire Code.

Page 325
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

18. The Public Works Department, Floodplain Management Division determined the
site is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone A, on panel 1740 L of
the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated October 16, 2013. The Public
Works Department provided Stipulation No. 10 to require the applicant follow
and document all necessary processes and improvements.

19. The Street Transportation Department provided Stipulation Nos. 6, 7, and 9 to
require traffic calming at vehicular driveways, two pedestrian connections to the
Grand Canal trail, and their standard stipulation regarding the applicant being
responsible for construction of adjacent streets, respectively.

The Street Transportation Department including the Pedestrian Safety
Coordinator further commented on the importance of enhanced pedestrian and
bicycle facilities including detached sidewalks, bicycle parking, a bicycle repair
station, and connections to the Grand Canal trail. These issues are addressed
in other stipulations or will be addressed through the application of the Walkable
Urban Code.

20. The Public Transit Department commented on the need for a robust system of
shaded pedestrian pathways with measures to delineate pedestrian crossings at
drive-aisles. These issues are addressed in other stipulations or will be
addressed through the application of the Walkable Urban Code.

OTHER
21. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in
the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the
time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 13.

22. Based on the proximity to Sky Harbor Airport, the Aviation Department is
requiring Stipulation Nos. 11 and 12 which require recorded documents to
disclose the existence of Sky Harbor Airport to future owners and residents, and
that an avigation easement be recorded.

23. Development and use of the site are subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.
Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments may be required.

Page 326
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

Findings

1. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map designation of
Residential 15+ Dwelling Units Per Acre and the TOD Strategic Policy Framework
Minor Urban Center Place Type designation.

2. The development advances the vision and recommendations contained in the
Uptown Transit Oriented Development Plan and will support pedestrian oriented
development near the light rail and multiple urban bikeways.

3. The proposal will create additional housing options for the significant number of
residents in the Uptown TOD District.

Stipulations

1. The south facing mass of the building(s) oriented to the Grand Canal shall
incorporate Walkable Urban Code Frontage Types described in Section 1305
for a minimum 40 percent of the building face(s), as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. For the purpose applying the above provisions,
the above shall be treated as a Secondary Frontage with regard to glazing.

2. The south facing mass of the building(s) oriented to the Grand Canal shall
contain architectural embellishments, design detailing, and / or space
programming to activate and provide visual access onto the canal, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Examples of
appropriate enhancements may include textural changes, offsets, recesses,
variation in window size and location, overhang canopies, balconies with a
depth greater of than 3 feet, and amenities such as gathering spaces.

3. Between the southern mass of the building and the south property line (the
Grand Canal right-of-way), the developer shall plant minimum 3-inch caliper,
large canopy shade trees, at a minimum frequency of 25 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.

4. The provisions of Section 1310.A.2 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance shall
apply to require shaded open space of which a minimum 50 percent shall be
situated adjacent to the south property line (the Grand Canal right-of-way), as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

Page 327
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

5. No solid perimeter wall greater than 36 inches in height shall be oriented to
and located within 30 feet of the south property line (the Grand Canal right-of-
way), as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6. The developer shall provide traffic calming to slow vehicle traffic exiting the
property with specific regard to pedestrian safety on the public sidewalk, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. The developer shall provide a minimum of two direct and accessible pedestrian
connections from the amenity areas located south of the building mass to the
shared use path along the Grand Canal Trail, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. The developer shall provide and maintain the following bicycle infrastructure as
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. A bicycle repair station (fix-it station) along the southern edge of the
site, visible, and accessible from the public sidewalk and / or the Grand
Canal Trail. The station shall include but not limited to: standard repair
tools affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump; and a bicycle repair
stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while adjusting the
bike.

b. All required bicycle parking for multifamily use, per Section 1307.H.6.d
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be secured parking.

c. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be provided at
a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit with a maximum of 50 spaces near
entrances of buildings and installed per the requirements of Section
1306.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

9. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

10. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone A, on panel
1740 L of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated October 16, 2013. The
following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

Page 328
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain boundary
limits on the Grading and Drainage plan and ensure that impacts to the
proposed facilities have been considered, following the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3); this
includes, but not limited to provisions in the latest versions of the
Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of Public Works Department for review
and approval of Floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved CLOMR-F or CLOMR
prior to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit.

11. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

12. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

13. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

Writer
Nick Klimek
January 20, 2021

Team Leader
Samantha Keating

Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Conceptual Site Plan and Elevations date stamped October 19, 2020 (2 pages)
Community Correspondence (4 pages)

Page 329
Staff Report: Z-56-20-4
January 20, 2021

North Central Employment Center Profile (2 pages)

Page 330
ELM ST

1ST AVE
C-2 H-R*
R-4 HP R-4A H-R * Z-60-85
Z-83-05
Z-9-89
P-1 * R-5 C-2
R-4 Z-341-83
HIGHLAND AVE

R-3
3RD AVE
R-3
R-3 PUD
Z-31-12
Z-83-05

COOLIDGE ST
R-3
R-5
R-5 *
Z-245-82 TOD District Canalscape
C-2
- UpTown
HAZELWOOD ST

R-4
CENTRAL AVE
HGT/WVR PKG/WVR
Central Avenue Z-175-87
Development Z-147-97
Standards
P-1 Transit C-2
MINNEZONA AVE Overlay District
(TOD-1)
C-2
R1-6 H-R
R1-6 P-2
2ND AVE
R-4 HP * HP
5TH AVE
Z-SP-16-72 Z-12-97 C-2
CAMPBELL AVE

R-4A*
Z-12-97
Z-102-98

I
Miles
Z-56-20 NORTHERN AVE

GLENDALE AVE

0.055 0.0275 0 0.055 BETHANY HOME RD
ALHAMBRA VILLAGE
CAMELBACK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4
43RD AVE 7ST AVE
7TH AVE
19TH AVE
35TH AVE
27TH AVE

I-17

APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Trinsic Residential Group, Todd Gosselin
FROM:
R-3 ( 0.18 a.c.)
10/23/2020
R-5 ( 3.11 a.c.)
DATE:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-56-20 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
3.29 Acres QS 18-27 H-8 TO: WU Code T5:5 UT ( 3.29 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
R-3, R-5 2, 135 3, 162
WU Code T5:5 UT No Maximum N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Page 331
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2020\Z-56-20.mxd
ELM ST

1ST AVE
C-2 H-R*
R-4 HP R-4A H-R * Z-60-85
Z-83-05
Z-9-89
P-1 * R-5 C-2
R-4 Z-341-83
HIGHLAND AVE

R-3
3RD AVE
R-3
R-3 PUD
Z-31-12
Z-83-05

COOLIDGE ST
R-3
R-5
R-5 *
Z-245-82 TOD District Canalscape
C-2
- UpTown
HAZELWOOD ST

R-4
CENTRAL AVE
HGT/WVR PKG/WVR
Central Avenue Z-175-87
Development Z-147-97
Standards
P-1 Transit C-2
MINNEZONA AVE Overlay District
(TOD-1)
C-2
R1-6 H-R
R1-6 P-2
2ND AVE
R-4 HP * HP
5TH AVE
Z-SP-16-72 Z-12-97 C-2
CAMPBELL AVE

R-4A*
Z-12-97
Z-102-98
Maricopa County Assessor's Office

I
Miles
Z-56-20 NORTHERN AVE

GLENDALE AVE

0.055 0.0275 0 0.055 BETHANY HOME RD
ALHAMBRA VILLAGE
CAMELBACK RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4
43RD AVE 7ST AVE
7TH AVE
19TH AVE
35TH AVE
27TH AVE

I-17

APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Trinsic Residential Group, Todd Gosselin
FROM:
R-3 ( 0.18 a.c.)
10/23/2020
R-5 ( 3.11 a.c.)
DATE:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-56-20 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
3.29 Acres QS 18-27 H-8 TO: WU Code T5:5 UT ( 3.29 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
R-3, R-5 2, 135 3, 162
WU Code T5:5 UT No Maximum N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Page 332
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2020\Z-56-20.mxd
(;,67,1*6,1*/()$0,/< (;,67,1*6,1*/()$0,/< (;,67,1*6,1*/()$0,/< (;,67,1*6,1*/()$0,/< (;,67,1*6,1*/()$0,/<
/(*$/'(6&5,37,21 5 5 5 5 5
'(9(/230(17'$7$
7+(/$1'5()(55('72+(5(,1%(/2:,66,78$7(',17+(&2817< 6
2+( 2+( 2+(
2+( 2+( 2+( 2+( 352-(&7'(6&5,37,21
2)0$5,&23$67$7(2)$5,=21$$1',6'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6 AURA
* * * * 75,16,&5(6,'(17,$/*5283,17(1'672'(9(/23$1(;&(37,21$/81,708/7,)$0,/<
3$5&(/12
5(6,'(17,$/ )255(17 3523(577+(:(67+$/)2)/27$1'7+(($67+$/)2)/2768%85%$1 6/*
&22/,'*(675((7 38%/,&52$':$< $1'&22/,'*(675((7
$&5(6$&&25',1*723/$72)5(&25',17+(2)),&(2)7+(
:: * * *
( * * : :
&2817<5(&25'(52)0$5,&23$&2817<$5,=21$5(&25'(',1 : : * * *
° °63

=21,1* '(16,7< $31
%22.2)0$363$*( 5&
35,0$5<)5217$*(/275(48,5(0(170,1
5&
: : : :
COOLIDGE
3529,'(' &855(175 352326(' % 3RD AVENUE AND COOLIDGE
(;&(377+(1257+)((7)25675((7385326(6 )2
2+( 6725()5217 67223 '225:(// 67223 '225:(// 352326(':87 '8$&5( 81,76
3$5&(/12 : : : 67223 '225:(// : : : : : : :
PHOENIX, AZ 85013
: : : : : :
7+(:(67+$/)2)/2768%85%$1$&5(6$&&25',1*723/$7
2)5(&25',17+(2)),&(2)7+(&2817<5(&25'(52)0$5,&23$ /27$5($ $00(1,7,(6

&2817<$5,=21$5(&25'(',1%22.2)0$363$*( : (
*8/<+='? 52: *5266 6) DFUHV 322/63$),71(66
(;&(377+(1257+)((7)2552$' :
: :
:
3$5&(/12 1(7 6) DFUHV 5(&5($7,21&/8%5220%,.(

6725$*(
f Rich B
/2768%85%$1$&5(6$&&25',1*723/$72)5(&25',17+( 6 :

2)),&(2)7+(&2817<5(&25'(52)0$5,&23$&2817<$5,=21$
2+( 6 (
( (

( ( (
)2 )2 )2 )2 ( &216758&7,217<3( 6(7%$&.6 3(5&+$37(575$16(&77
eo
5(&25'(',1%22.2)0$363$*( 6
6 (
(;&(377+(5()5207+(1257+)((77+(5(2) )2 3$5.,1**$5$*( ,$ 35,0$5<)5217$*( &22/,'*( 0$;
(;&(377+(5()5207+(:(67)((77+(5(2)$1' *$5$*( (/(& 5(6,'(17,$/ 9$ 6(&21'$5<)5217$*( UG$9( 0$;
( %8,/',1*+(,*+7
(;&(377+(5()520$1<3$577+(5(2)/<,1*:,7+,17+(:(67 (175<(;,7 6,'(/27/,1( ($67 0,1
)((72)7+(6287+($6748$57(52)7+(1257+:(6748$57(52) 0$;)((7
Of
3529,'(' )((7
6(&7,2172:16+,31257+5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1' : %8,/',1*$5($6
6$/75,9(5%$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<$5,=21$$6
3529,'(',1'(('5(&25'(',1'2&.(73$*(
0$; 81,70,; /(9(// %8,/',1*$5($ 6)

er Arch
2+( /(9(// %8,/',1*$5($ 6)
3$5&(/12 67$,5
678',2
6725<5(&/($6,1* 6(7%$&.
LLC fic
7+(6287+)((72)7+(1257+)((72)/2768%85%$1 67$,5 (/(& /(9(// %8,/',1*$5($ 6)
%('5220
arb
$&5(6$&&25',1*723/$72)5(&25',17+(2)),&(2)7+( 81,76:,7+ /(9(// %8,/',1*$5($ 6)
&2817<5(&25'(52)0$5,&23$&2817<$5,=21$5(&25'(',1 )2 %('5220
0$; 6725< 727$/ 6)
%22.2)0$363$*( 6(7%$&. 6725< 0(==$1,1($%29( 727$/81,76
cture,
(;&(377+()2//2:,1*'(6&5,%('3$5&(/)2552$':$< 0(==$1,1(
0(==$1,1( *$5$*(%8,/',1*$5($6 ite
385326(6 $//81,766+$//%(2)$7/($67$16,
( /(9(// *$5$*($5($ 6)
7+$73$572)7+(6287+)((72)7+(1257+)((72)/27 7<3( % $&&(66,%,/,7<67$1'$5'6
2+( : /(9(// *$5$*($5($ 6)
68%85%$1$&5(6/<,1*:,7+,1)((72)7+(02180(17/,1(2) 2)81,7672%($16,7<3( $ WorldHQ@ORBArch.com
7+,5'$9(18($66$,'02180(17/,1(,66+2:1217+(3/$72) $&&(66,%,/,7<67$1'$5'6 /(9(// *$5$*($5($ 6)
6287+3,(56213/$&(7+(3/$72):+,&+,65(&25'(',1%22. /(9(// *$5$*($5($ 6)
(/(9 75$6+
2)0$363$*( *$5$*(/(9(// *$5$*($5($ 6)
/27&29(5$*(
3$5&(/12
)2 67$,5 /(9(// *$5$*( *$5$*($5($ 6) 8 + * ' 8 ). /
7+(6287+)((72)7+(:(67)((72)7+(($67)((72) :+ :+
$5($3529,'(' /9
1 ( 727$/ 6) - :/
, / )' : + ) :
7+(1257+)((72)/2768%85%$1$&5(6$1'7+(1257+ (/(9 8+
+8
6,7(1(7$5($ )
)((72)7+(6287+)((72)7+(:(67)((72)7+(($67 6725<5(6,'(17,$/ /2%%< 3(5&(173529,'('
2+(
)((72)7+(1257+)((72)/2768%85%$1$&5(6 23(163$&(

$&&25',1*723/$72)5(&25',17+(2)),&(2)7+(&2817< 35,0$5<)5217$*(5(48,5('0,1,080 5LFK%DUEHU
: 5(48,5(' 2)*5266$&5($*(
5(&25'(52)0$5,&23$&2817<$5,=21$5(&25'(',1%22. 3529,'('
( *G Z
2)0$363$*( 6(& K
9O M
$5($3529,'(' T K J
3$5&(/12 6(&21'$5<)5217$*(5(48,5('0,1,080 '8
7+(1257+)((72)7+(:(67)((72)7+(($67)((72) (;,67,1* 9$1 &(17(5&2857<$5' 6) / @ 5 4 ; 9 '
'
3529,'('
7+(1257+)((72)/2768%85%$1$&5(6$&&25',1*72 )2 6287+&2857<$5' 6) +^VOXKY°°
6,1*/(
3/$72)5(&25',17+(2)),&(2)7+(&2817<5(&25'(52) 727$/ 6)
)$0,/< 2+(
0$5,&23$&2817<$5,=21$5(&25'(',1%22.2)0$363$*( 6,7(*5266$5($
5
3$5.,1* 3(5&(173529,'(' 6)6)
(;&(37,1*7+(5()5207+$73257,212)7+(/$1'&219(<('72 6(6 (;,67,1*
:$7(5
7+(&,7<2)3+2(1,;$081,&,3$/&25325$7,21025( )($785( 5 5(48,5('
:
0$,17(1$1&(
3$57,&8/$5/<'(6&5,%(',148,7&/$,0'(('5(&25'(' 63$&(63(5678',2 [
129(0%(5$62)2)),&,$/5(&25'6 63$&(63(5 %(' [ */$=,1*

3$5&(/12 ),5( 727$/5(48,5(' 36
3,7 (

7+(($67)((72)7+(1257+)((72)/2768%85%$1 2+( 5(485,('3(57$%/(75$16(&77
$&5(6$&&25',1*723/$72)5(&25',17+(2)),&(2)7+( )2 5$0383 5('8&7,21
0,1,080*5281')/225
&2817<5(&25'(52)0$5,&23$&2817<$5,=21$5(&25'(',1 1 ( 0$; 5('8&7,21)25352;,0,7<72/,*+75$,/ )5217$*( ; 6)
%22.2)0$363$*( 6(7%$&. 67$7,21
*/$=,1* 6)
(;&(377+(1257+)((77+(5(2) 36[ 5(48,5('63$&(6

3529,'('
3529,'('
&,7<2)3+2(1,;6,7(3/$1127(6 6)6)
:
UG$9(18( 38%/,&52$':$<
/2$',1* 35263(&7,9(5(6,'(17
=21(

'HYHORSPHQWDQGXVHRIWKLVVLWHZLOOFRQIRUPZLWKDOODSSOLFDEOHFRGHV 5(6,'(17*$5$*( ),5(635,1./(56
(/(9
DQGRUGLQDQFHV 2+( 6 : 727$/3529,'('
)2 6725<5(6,'(17,$/
$OOQHZRUUHORFDWHGXWLOLWLHVZLOOEHSODFHGXQGHUJURXQG 1 :
(;,67,1* 1)3$
³6WUXFWXUHVDQGODQGVFDSLQJZLWKLQDWULDQJOHPHDVXUHGEDFN¶ IURP 6,1*/(
*$5$*( +(,*+7 $&&(66,%/(3$5.,1* ,1&/8'(',1&2817
WKHSURSHUW\OLQHDQG¶ DORQJWKHSURSHUW\OLQHRQHDFKVLGHRIWKH )$0,/< 5(48,5('
GULYHZD\VHQWUDQFHVZLOOEHPDLQWDLQHGDWDPD[LPXPKHLJKWRI¶´
%8,/',1*)5217$*((175<
5
6WUXFWXUHVDQGODQGVFDSLQJZLWKLQDWULDQJOHPHDVXULQJ¶ [¶ DORQJ 6(&21'$5<)5217$*(/275(48,5(0(170,1,080
*$5$*(/ 36 9$1$&&(6,%/( 5(48,5(0(176
WKHSURSHUW\OLQHVZLOOEHPDLQWDLQHGDWDPD[LPXPKHLJKWRI¶ *$5$*(/ 36
$Q\OLJKWLQJZLOOEHSODFHGVRDVWRGLUHFWOLJKWDZD\IURPDGMDFHQW : *$5$*(/ 36 5(48,5(' 75$16(&77
6 ( 35,0$5<%8,/',1*)5217$*(
UHVLGHQWLDOGLVWULFWVDQGZLOOQRWH[FHHGRQHIRRWFDQGOHDWWKHSURSHUW\ 5$0383
OLQH1RQRLVHRGRURUYLEUDWLRQZLOOEHHPLWWHGDWDQ\OHYHOH[FHHGLQJ 3529,'(' 36 9$1$&&(6,%/( 6(&21'$5<%8,/',1*)5217$*(
6725<
WKHJHQHUDOOHYHORIQRLVHRGRURUYLEUDWLRQHPLWWHGE\XVHVLQWKHDUHD
Page 333
:
2+( :
RXWVLGHRIWKHVLWH )2 0(==$1,1(
2ZQHUVRISURSHUW\DGMDFHQWWRSXEOLFULJKWVRIZD\ZLOOKDYHWKH .(<127(6
UHVSRQVLELOLW\IRUPDLQWDLQLQJDOOODQGVFDSLQJORFDWHGZLWKLQWKHULJKWVRI
3529,'('
:

ZD\LQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKDSSURYHGSODQV
$OOURRIWRSHTXLSPHQWDQGVDWHOOLWHGLVKHVVKDOOEHVFUHHQHGWRWKH $&&(66,%/(*$5$*(63$&( [

KHLJKWRIWKHWDOOHVWHTXLSPHQW 9(+,&8/$56/,',1**$7(
)2
$OOVHUYLFHDUHDVVKDOOEHVFUHHQHGWRFRQFHDOWUDVKFRQWDLQHUVORDGLQJ 6,'(:$/.6((/$1'6&$3(
GRFNVWUDQVIRUPHUVEDFNIORZSUHYHQWHUVDQGRWKHUPHFKDQLFDORU 6,'(:$/.6((/$1'6&$3(
HOHFWULFDOHTXLSPHQWIURPH\HOHYHODGMDFHQWWRDOOSXEOLFVWUHHWV 52: (/(9
)2 [ 6,*+79,6,%,/,7<75,$1*/(
/2%%<
67223 '225:(//
%DUEHGUD]RURUFRQFHUWLQDZLUH RUVLPLODU VKDOOQRWEHXVHGRQWKLV 67$,5
322/ 9$1 9$1 [ 6,*+79,6,%,/,7<75,$1*/(
VLWHZKHUHYLVLEOHIURPSXEOLFVWUHHWVRUDGMDFHQWUHVLGHQWLDODUHDV &29(5(' (48,30(17
+( 3$9,/,21 (/(9

$OOVLJQDJHUHTXLUHVVHSDUDWHUHYLHZVDSSURYDOVDQGSHUPLWV1R )2 %8,/',1*(175<(;,7

VLJQVDUHDSSURYHGSHUWKLVSODQ : (;7(1'('3$7,2672236
*DWHVDUHWRUHPDLQRSHQRUDUHWRRSHQDXWRPDWLFDOO\EHWZHHQWKH (175<67$,5
%%4
KRXUVRIBBBBBBDQGBBBBBB )2
*$5$*((175<$7*5281'/(9(/:,7+5(6,'(17,$/81,76/(9(/6
3OHDVHFRQVLGHUSODFLQJWKHIROORZLQJQRWH VLJQHGDQGGDWHG RQWKHVLWH
SODQWRDXWKRUL]HPLQRUDPHQGPHQWWRWKHSODQLQWKHIXWXUH 6($7:$// 75$6++2/',1*5220)8//<6&5((1('$7*5281'/(9(/:,7+5(6,'(17,$/
)2 81,76/(9(/6((62/,':$67(1$55$7,9(7+,66+((7
,FRQVHQWWRWKHUHSURGXFWLRQRIWKLVVLWHSODQSURYLGHGWKDWLI *$0(/$:1 75$6+&203$&725

PRGLILFDWLRQVDUHPDGHWKHSURIHVVLRQDOVZKRPDNHVXFKFKDQJHV )2
6($7:$// 9(+,&8/$57851$55281'63$&(
DVVXPHIXOOUHVSRQVLELOLW\DQGOLDELOLW\IRUWKHPRGLILHGSRUWLRQVRIWKH 0(&+$1,&$/9(17,/$7,216+$)7
),5(
SODQ 3,7
2+( *8/<+='? [ /2$',1*=21(21(/2$',1*%$<5(48,5('3(5:8&2'(7$%/(
)2 :

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
6,*1$785(2)&23<5,*+72:1(5'$7( (;+,67,1*),5(+<'5$17
)2
6725<
5LFK%DUEHU
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 0(==$1,1(
35,17('1$0(2)&23<5,*+72:1(5
2+(
),5(3/$&(

62/,':$67(127(6 1 :
:
&2857<$5'
62/,':$67(1$55$7,9(
75$6+&+87(6$5(/2&$7(',17+(3$5.,1**$5$*(21$//
)/2256$1'$1$'',7,21$/&+87(/2&$7('217+(:(676,'( 67$,5
6<17+(7,&
2)%8,/',1* %%4 /$:1

6725<),71(66 6725< 5(9,6,21668%0,77$/6
75$6+7(50,1$7,2152206$5(/2&$7(',13$5.,1**$5$*(
$7*5$'(/(9(/$1'21:(676,'(2)%8,/',1*:+(5(75$6+ 81,76:,7+ 0(==$1,1( '$7( '(6&5,37,21
)2 )2 )2 )2 )2 )2 )2 )2

,6&203$&7('$1'3/$&(',172<'%,1675$6+%,16$5( 0(==$1,1($%29( 75/( .,9$352-(&7
7$.(172+2/',1*5220/2&$7('$7*5$'(/(9(/211257+ 67$,5
6( : 6'(9
6,'(2)*$5$*(+2/',1*5220,6&203/(7(/<(1&/26('$1' (;
)$&7
/,*+7
/
6
6&5((1(':,7+*$7(6 6(((/(9$7,216 2175$6+3,&.83 0$; (17 3$33

'$<6%,16$5(7$.(1287%<67$))723529,'('67$*,1*$5($ 2+( 6(7%$&. ($60 46
)25&2//(&7,21<'5(&<&/(%,1:,//%(3529,'(',1 %(1&+
237,21$/

/$:1

3257$/
*$5$*($&&(66,%/(72$//5(6,'(1765(&<&/(%,1:,//%(
*$0(/$:1
%.
52//('287213,&.83'$<7267$*,1*$5($ ),71(66/$:1
6725<
5(48,5('62/,':$67(&$3$&,7< %,.(
5(3$,5 0(==$1,1( %%4
),5(3,7 %(1&+
0,1,75$6+&203$&7256$5(/2&$7(',17+(3$5.,1* &2857<$5' 6($7:$//

*$5$*(/(9(/($&+&203$&725&203$&7675$6+,172<' 2+( 5'$9(18(
%,.( : 7+$9(18(
%,16 /$:1
5$&.6
&(175$/$9(18(
&22/,'*(675((7
0,1,75$6+&203$&725,6/2&$7('21/(9(/ :(676,'( 6

2)%8,/',1* &203$&725&203$&7675$6+,172<'%,16 6,7(
1(,*+%25+22' (;
&8%,&<$5'63(581,7; &<6(59,&('7:,&( 3$5.3$7,2 /,*+7

3(5:((. &<&203$&7,212) &<3(5
%(1&+ %,.(
6(59,&(7:,&(3(5:((. 5$&.6 $1$/
5$03
&<3(56(59,&(&<3(5%,1 0,12)%,16,1+2/',1* *5$1'& DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2020 ORB #: 20-212
5220
$6,1*/(&<5(&<&/(%,1$5(/2&$7(',1*$5$*(1($50$,1 $60(17 &$03%(//$9(18(

(175<6(59,&(:,//%(%$6('2186($1'%8,/',1* /$:1
(
(: $/.
2&&83$1&< * 6,'
%. : 7,1 $/
(;
(;,6 '&$1
/,*+7
6 *5$1
(
2+
2+(

2+
(
35(/,0,1$5<6,7(3/$1
9,&,1,7<0$3
A1.10
6&$/(
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
127726&$/(
(/3° °'[XG°)UUROJMKE'[XG°)UUROJMKX\Z
Page 334
&LW\RI3KRHQL[(PSOR\PHQW&HQWHU3UR´OH

NORTH CENTRAL
The North Central
employment center Labor Force Accessibility and Skills
offers an exceptional The North Central employment center offers excellent access to a large portion
of the metro area’s 1.7 million workers. Approximately 770,000 young, well-educated
location in one of the workers reside within a 30 minute drive time.1 High concentrations of service and
FLW\VSUHPLHURI´FH health care workers live within 10 to 20 minutes. In addition, about 16 percent of the
corridors. workforce living within a 20 minute drive time is made up of executives, managers
and technical professionals.2
Projected growth for this area will result in close to 170,000 new residents within
a 30 minute drive time by 2020, providing a continually expanding labor pool.3
This employment
center extends from 1, 2, 3 Claritas, 2015.
McDowell Road north
to Camelback Road
between Seventh
Street and Seventh Employment by Occupation
Avenue. The North Workforce 10 Min. Drive 20 Min. Drive 30 Min. Drive
Central area includes Number % Number % Number %
KLJKULVHRI´FHDQG
Management 7,416 7 57,595 8 131,498 9
residential buildings
Engineering & Science 2,224 2 16,777 2 36,046 3
surrounded by
historic single family Healthcare & Education 11,089 10 82,493 11 170,387 12
neighborhoods, parks Service 16,173 15 109,119 15 195,911 14
and cultural amenities. Sales 10,112 9 81,075 11 167,369 12
Clerical & Admin. Support 15,143 14 117,524 16 219,346 16
Construction 8,978 8 48,001 6 71,611 5
Production 6,210 6 39,874 5 64,441 5
Trans./Material Mover 6,373 6 46,614 6 76,283 5
Total 83,718 599,072 1,132,892
Source: Claritas, 2015.

Commute Shed
Commuters who travel to
Employment Corridor per
Square Mile
4 to 10
10 to 25
25 to 50
More than 50
• Access to a large executive Phoenix North Central Job Center
and professional workforce Phoenix North Central Job
Center Catchment Area

• Advanced
telecommunications
infrastructure

• /DUJHLQYHQWRU\RIRI´FH
space

• Competitive lease rates
Source: Maricopa Association of
• Superior accessibility to Governments, TRP Reduction Database,
NH\EXVLQHVVDQG´QDQFLDO 2013
services
Equal Opportunity Employer/Program. Auxiliary Aids and services are available upon request to individuals with
Page 335
disabilities. Products and services made available through Federal Funding provided by the Workforce Investment Act.
Camelback Rd.
Metro Light Rail
Existing and Planned
Sites and Buildings Development
The North Central employment center offers 1. Century Link Tower
a large inventory of office and commercial 586,403 sq. ft.

Central Ave.
space mixed with a variety of hotel and Office

7th Ave.
Steele Indian
residential developments. From high-rise office
7th St.
2. Viad Tower Phase II School Park
buildings and condominiums to palm tree-lined 478,488 sq. ft.
streets of historic single-family neighborhoods, Office - Proposed
diversity enhances the appeal of this 3. Phoenix Corporate Tower
445,811 sq. ft.
conveniently located area. Indian School Rd.
Office
The area has about 14.5 million square feet 4. Phoenix Plaza Tower II
of existing office space in close proximity to 419,453 sq. ft.
downtown. For companies that require build-to- Office
suit space, there are prime commercial high-rise 5. Phoenix Plaza Tower I
418,613 sq. ft. 8
parcels available.4 Osborn Rd.
The map to the right highlights the type Office
of community real estate in the North Central 6. Younan Central Plaza
405,693
area. Our team can provide more detail, custom 3
Office
information based on your requirements. 7. 2800 Tower 4
364,533 sq. ft. 5 1
Thomas Rd.
4 CoStar Realty Information Inc., 2015 Office
8. 3550 Tower 7
287,269 sq. ft.
Connectivity Office
9. Park Central - Bldg 7
The North Central employment center 224,953 sq. ft.
features modern, reliable telecommunications Office
10. Security Title Plaza
infrastructure that is supported by multiple
219,032 sq. ft.
providers. These providers are able to offer Office 2
specialized capabilities such as complete digital
infrastructure, T-1 (DS1) lines, T-3 (DS3) lines, McDowell Rd.
Source: CoStar Realty Information Inc., 2015
self-healing ﬁber ring architecture and high-
speed data communications. Local exchange
carriers with service in the North Central area Amenities and Attractions
include CenturyLink and Cox Communications.
The exciting Phoenix Arts District includes the Phoenix Art Museum
and Theater, the Playhouse on the Park and the internationally renowned
Infrastracture Heard Museum of Native American Art. Steele Indian School Park, located
Abundant and reliable power sources at the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Indian School Road, features
are available from a highly advanced network an expansive 15-acre entry garden, several historical buildings depicting the
system that provides redundant feeds from history of Phoenix Indian School, an amphitheater with seating for 1,500, a
multiple sub-stations. 2.5-acre bird-shaped lake and waterfall and a 15-acre neighborhood park.
The North Central employment center enjoys Located in the heart of the North Central employment center, Park Central
easy access to a modern network of urban is a 500,000 square foot mixed-use redevelopment featuring offices, retail,
freeways and arterial streets. This employment restaurants and business-oriented hotels. In addition, there are a number
center has excellent transit service and is of new luxury apartment developments in the area that provide a variety
located along the METRO light rail transit line of housing options for workers and support continued office and retail
that connects the area to downtown Phoenix, development.
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport and
surrounding cities. Major Area Employers
For businesses that require convenient
air access, Phoenix Sky Harbor International CenturyLink PricewaterhouseCoopers
Telecommunications Accounting and Management Consulting
Airport is located just 15 minutes away. The Deloitte LLP Dignity Health
airport is one of the busiest in the U.S. based Accounting and Management Consulting Hospital Administration
on passenger traffic and offers more than 830 Fennemore Craig IBM Corporation
Law Firm Administrative Operations
daily non-stop ﬂights to nearly 80 domestic
SCF Arizona U-Haul International
destinations and 13 international destinations.5 Direct Property and Casuality Insurance - HQ Leasing Services - Corp. HQ
Viad Corporation Xerox Corporation
5 Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2015. Business Services - HQ Copiers and Office Products
BMO Harris Bank
Banking and Financial Services

Source: Maricopa Association of Governments, 2013

PHOENIX IS DESIGNED City of Phoenix
Community and Economic Development Department

TO WORK. Page 336
200 W. Washington St., 20th Floor | Phoenix, AZ 85003
www.phoenix.gov/econdev | 602-262-5040
From: Adam Ghiz
To: Nick Klimek
Cc: ben@witheymorris.com
Subject: Re: Z-56-20 (3rd Avenue and Coolidge)
Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 12:07:07 PM

One Additional concern.

The large grassy area on the corner of 3rd and Coolidge has been used for years by the
neighborhood as a makeshift park. Families have used this area for recreation with their
children and pets. It provides for a grassy green area, in an otherwise paved jungle. You will
be taking this away from all residents, and instead of providing more greenery, will be adding
more concrete.

~Adam

On Nov 3, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Adam Ghiz wrote:

Here are my concerns for this project:

1. 56ft building height allowed by T5:5
2. 10 ft setback from current sidewalk, this in combination of the height will
basically provide for an entire block of apartments from the canal to Coolidge
looking directly over my fence and into my yard and house.
3. Noise, this is an extremely quiet section and adding an additional 218 housing
units will greatly increase the noise factor of the neighborhood.
4. Traffic. Hazelwood turns into 3rd ave and as a result, there is a very low traffic
density. Even with the the garage entry on Coolidge, traffic is going to greatly
increase on these streets and most likely all street parking with cease to exist.
5. Saturation. There are already 5 or 6 (possibly even more) high density
apartment complexes in this immediate area. Adding yet another complex will
adversely and disproportionately affect this neighborhood vs other
neighborhoods.
6. Historic district. This complex is almost surrounded on the 3rd ave and
Coolidge street sections by the Pierson Place Historic district. Constructing this
large complex when surrounded by a historic district diminishes the intention of
having a historic district. The proposed elevations are quoted as “blending in” yet
it looks like every other apartment complex built.

This project adversely affects my property disproportionately as I am on the
corner of 3rd and Hazelwood and this apartment complex will be towering over
my house, and on the entire east side of my property I will now stare at 56ft of
apartment building.

~Adam

On Nov 3, 2020, at 11:18 AM, Nick Klimek
wrote:

Page 337
Good morning, Adam –

I apologize but I believe I failed to answer one of your primary questions,
expressed via Maura, regarding whether the property is currently
approved for development. The answer is both yes and no… please allow
me to explain.

The property is currently zoned R-5 which generally means they could
build to a height of 48 feet.

However, the applicant has elected to pursue additional zoning
entitlement under the Walkable Urban Code. The process will take 4-6
months and include 3 public hearings and a neighborhood meeting.
During this process, the site plan may change and evolve in response to
community concerns and priorities. I recommend putting your concerns in
writing and sending them over to me. I also suggest reaching out to the
applicant’s representative, Ben Tate, to express yours concerns early on.

In the coming weeks, I will be reviewing the proposal in greater detail.

Kind regards,

Nick

Nick Klimek, AICP
Village Planner
Office: 602-534-7696
E-mail: nick.klimek@phoenix.gov

Planning & Development Department
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better
Phoenix

***I am currently working remotely on a rotational schedule, but will be
checking voicemails multiple times per day. Please feel free to leave me a
voice message or email me for a more timely response. Thank you.***

From: Adam Ghiz
Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 10:45 AM
To: Nick Klimek

Page 338
Subject: Re: Z-56-20 (3rd Avenue and Coolidge)

Thanks for the response. So I am in the house directly across from this and
will be affected greatly as most of my exposure is to the east where the
current donor network building is. This picture is what I see from most of
my house. I estimate that these trees are approximately 30ft tall and
from what I have seen, it looks like the building will be 56ft tall. Also,
correct me if I am wrong, but the building will only be setback 10 ft from
the current sidewalk?

If this is the case, how can I expect any modicum of privacy? Not to
mention, that all I will be able to see from my windows will now be
building.

How does a project this large get approved so close to a historic
residential neighborhood? It destroys any point in trying to preserve the
original feel of the neighborhood.

I am greatly distressed by this news and also would like to know if there is
an estimated time when construction will begin.

Thanks,
Adam

On Nov 3, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Nick Klimek
wrote:

Good morning, Mr. Ghiz –

My name is Nick Klimek and I am the Alhambra Village
Planner. I received your contact information from Maura
Jackson from our Historic Preservation Office. Please feel
free to send any written comments to me and I will ensure
they be provided to the applicant and included with the staff
report as the request is processed; in your email, please
reference the case number Z-56-20.

If you would like to discuss, please feel free to call me at the
below number but please note that the request is very new
so I may be light on exact details regarding the site plan.

Kind regards,

Page 339
Nick

Nick Klimek, AICP
Village Planner
Office: 602-534-7696
E-mail: nick.klimek@phoenix.gov

Planning & Development
Department
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation
for a Better Phoenix

***I am currently working remotely on a rotational schedule,
but will be checking voicemails multiple times per day.
Please feel free to leave me a voice message or email me
for a more timely response. Thank you.***

Page 340
Attachment C

Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-56-20-4

Date of VPC Meeting January 26, 2021

Request From R-3 and R-5
Request To WU Code T5:5 UT
Proposed Use Multifamily Residential

Location Southeast corner of 3rd Avenue and Coolidge Street

VPC Recommendation Approve per staff recommendation

VPC Vote 15-1-0, motion passes with Farina, Ammon, Ender,
Fitzgerald, Adams, Keyser, Kreitor, LeBlanc, Sanchez,
Jones, Solorio, McCabe, Bryck, Vice Chair Williams, and
Chair Shore in favor; Smith in dissent; and none in
abstention.

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

One speaker card was received on this item from an individual wishing to speak
in opposition to the request.

During this item, Becker was unavailable by audio or video and did not vote on
the item. For the purpose of the vote, he is considered absent reducing the
quorum to 16 members (10 being needed for a quorum).

STAFF PRESENTATION

Klimek, staff, provided an overview of the site, the request, the proposal, and the
recommendation. Located at the southeast corner of 3rd Avenue and Coolidge
Street, the site is currently occupied by an office complex, and the request is to
rezone the property from R-3 and R-5 to the Walkable Urban Code Transect 5:5
Uptown to allow for multifamily redevelopment. The site is within 0.25 miles of
light rail, multiple schools, and immediately adjacent to both the Phoenix Sonoran
Bikeway (3rd Avenue) and the Grand Canal which position the property at the
junction of two major bicycle routes.

The request is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map designation of
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre and with the Transit Oriented

Page 341
Development Strategic Policy Framework which is identified as supporting
intensity of 2 to 5 stories and up to 7 when certain bonus criteria are met.
Further, the proposal will advance the Canalscape Catalyst Project identified in
the Uptown Transit Oriented Development Policy Plan.

The proposal for a 4 story multifamily complex with 218 units includes shaded
and detached sidewalks along 3rd Avenue and Coolidge Street and “frontage
types” to activate the streetscape environment. The elevations and conceptual
site plan depict measures to engage and activate the Grand Canal including
frontage types oriented to the canal, plazas and amenities between the building
and the canal, and low walls designed to embrace the waterfront.

Staff is recommending approval, subject to 13 stipulations, on the basis of the
request being consistent and aligned with the recommendations of the Phoenix
General Plan, the TOD Strategic Policy Framework, the Uptown TOD Policy
Plan, and the Housing Phoenix Plan.

Stipulation Nos. 1 – 5 seek to promote a strong interface with the Grand Canal.
Stipulations Nos. 6 – 8 seek to promote a safe and comfortable environment for
pedestrians and bicyclists. Stipulation Nos. 9 – 13 include standard language
pertaining to street improvements, removing the site from the special flood
hazard area, aviation disclosures, and archaeology.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION

Jason Morris, of Withey Morris, introduced himself, his client, the project, and
the change happening in this area. Trinsic Residential has done many projects
throughout the region and their investment model is to hold their properties long
term due, in large part to their ownership structure which includes the Texas
Teachers’ Retirement Fund.

The property is currently an office complex but its tenant, the Donor Network of
Arizona, has relocated to Tempe. There is a concentration of multifamily
development here because of the urban core, because of the transit overlay, and
because of the transportation patterns in the area. The developer views this
location as an excellent opportunity for multi-modal transportation with the
adjacency to the Grand Canal, the Phoenix Sonoran Bikeway, and the light rail
along Central Avenue. Unlike the nearby multifamily residential projects, these
projects did not embrace the canal nor their street frontages. The subject site
currently is entitled for 4 story multifamily development, the developer is seeking
to transition this entitlement to the Walkable Urban Code to yield a better and
more context-appropriate project.

Multiple city adopted policies call for this level of intensity at this location
including the General Plan, the Transit Oriented Strategic Policy Framework, and
the Uptown Transit Oriented Development Policy Plan. The location is ideal to

Page 342
leverage the city’s investment in the light rail and in the Canalscape
improvements and the project is designed to embrace these policies and
investments.

The Walkable Urban Code is a newer zoning category that is much more
restrictive or directive in terms of the types of things that should be done in the
project while also being more flexible in other ways. He then provided an
overview of the site plan and renderings focusing on the street environment, the
canal interface designed to create more eyes and interaction onto this waterfront,
and the building architecture which includes offsets, recesses, and a variety of
materials to break up the mass of the building. The project is designed with units
wrapped around the parking structure which will not be visible from the perimeter.

Through the neighborhood outreach efforts which included an additional meeting
with the Pierson Place Historic Neighborhood, stakeholders raised a series of
concerns and the plan responds to these as follows:
• On Street Parking. Parking is provided in excess to the amount required
by code. To reduce the likelihood of street parking, the project was
designed to make street parking less convenient than garage parking for
future tenants. As a buy-hold builder, tenant retention is important to the
ownership group they are therefore conscious that parking must be
sufficient. Further, the applicant has agreed to work with the city to prohibit
on street parking along the 3rd Avenue and Coolidge Street frontages.
• Traffic. The development is served by a single-point of vehicular access
located at the far northeast corner of the site to reduce westbound traffic
through the neighborhood and to reduce vehicle conflicts with the
bikeway.
• Height. The site is currently permitted to build 48 feet and four stories and
the request for 56 feet and four stories is intended to allow for higher
ceiling heights. The increase in height from 48 to 56 feet will be
imperceptible from ground level and produce a significantly better project.
• Publicly Accessible Open Space. The plan includes a public amenity area
in the southwest corner of the site with a bicycle fix-it station, bike racks,
seating, and shade. The plan also includes publicly accessible lawn areas
and seating along the canal frontage with lush landscaping and a
pedestrian connection into the project.
• Trash Collection. Waste collection will be provided by a private contractor
with all dumpsters located within the parking structure which will reduce
noise.

He concluded by reiterating that the site is permitted for high density multifamily
currently, how the project embraces alternative transportation as an amenity in a
manner consistent with city policy and investments, and will create an enhanced
canalscape including an active interface with publicly accessible open space and
amenities.

Page 343
QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE

Solorio: Does the project include affordable units?
• Morris: No, while there is a need in the region, there is currently no
affordable housing program which would provide an even approach. If
such a program were in place, the applicant would participate.

Adams: What are the price-points for units, the size of units, and the projected
impact on nearby property values?
• Morris: The units will rent from $1,300 – $2,000. The project includes a
mix of unit sizes. Trinsic has studied the issue of property values in the
vicinity of their projects and has found that their projects produce an
increase in values beyond the increase projected by the market baseline.
He added that this trend is not universal for all multifamily projects but
because Trinsic is in it for the long-haul, their projects are well-designed,
well-managed, and well-maintained long term.
• Adams: Expressed concern over how the landscaping and architectural
design elements will likely be unsuccessful in breaking up the mass of the
building in reality.

Smith: Is this a 4 or 5 story building, is there an opportunity to reduce the height
of the building, and are they concerned about security with the site being so open
to the canal? She added concern that parking does not seem sufficient and noted
that it will likely spill over into the neighborhood.
• Morris: There will be a limited number of premium units that have an
interior staircase to a mezzanine level; that the applicant recognizes that
parking is an important consideration for long-term tenant retention and
has therefore studied the topic extensively; and that, while the project
does place more eyes on the canal, security measures include a perimeter
fence, access controlled gates, and all perimeter doors to the building
being locked.

The site is zoned for high-intensity multifamily, identified for high-intensity
residential in the General Plan, located nearly adjacent to the light rail, and
along two major alternative-transportation routes and the proposal
embraces these concepts utilizing the Walkable Urban Code which is
recommended for these types of circumstances. Change can be
challenging especially when it comes from “left field” but all publicly
accessible policy points to this being an area to accommodate growth. He
concluded this point by sharing that there are no single-family, owner
occupied homes north of Coolidge, and that the applicant has worked
extensively with owners west of the subject site to resolve concerns.

The development will include security measures such as a perimeter
fence, access-controlled gates, and all perimeter doors to the building
being locked.

Page 344
Ammon: What improvements are proposed at the 3rd Avenue bridge over the
canal, do the ground floor units have direct street access, is open space being
provided beyond code requirements, and does the project include photovoltaic
energy productions?
• Morris: There will be an open masonry portal that will further enhance and
complement the canalscape improvements. The ground floor units along
3rd Avenue and Coolidge Street have stoop and doorwell frontages and
the lobby will be a storefront. The project will have 12 percent open space
compared to the 5 percent required by code. To reduce the potential for
overflow parking and interference with the bikeway, they will work with the
city to prohibit on street parking.
• Gosselink: Todd Gosselink introduced himself as the developer and
explained that they are proud to include a photovoltaic array on the
building. One of their earlier projects, Aura Watermark, on the north shore
of Tempe Town Lake included a $150,000 solar array and was the first
market-rate, multifamily project, in Arizona to include solar energy. They
currently have a project at Central Avenue and Indianola Avenue with a
$750,000 solar array. Trinsic recognizes the value of solar as long term
investors and this project will have a $750,000 – $1,000,000 solar array on
the rooftop in addition to other efficiency enhancements.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

Frank Paoletti introduced himself and state that he lives on Coolidge Street west
of the subject site and has livered there for 22 years and knew some of the
original owners. He expressed concerns related to parking, safety, and traffic
noting that Coolidge does not have sidewalks west of 3rd Avenue. He asked
whether the streets, sewers, and other infrastructure can accommodate another
218 units and 436 cars daily.

APPLICANT RESPONSE

Morris responded that traffic and on street parking had been early concerns from
the neighborhood and the plan had been revised to address these issues. He
added that code could have required less parking but, given its importance to
retaining tenants, the plan includes structured parking in excess of that required
by code. Regarding traffic, the site is zoned for high-intensity development and is
developed as an office complex, and therefore, the proposed multifamily complex
will replace traffic and infrastructure impacts already present on the site.

FLOOR/PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED: DISCUSSION, MOTION AND VOTE

Motion
Bryck moved to approve the request per staff recommendation. McCabe
seconded the motion.

Page 345
VOTE: 15-1-0, motion passes with Farina, Ammon, Ender, Fitzgerald,
Adams, Keyser, Kreitor, LeBlanc, Sanchez, Jones, Solorio, McCabe,
Bryck, Vice Chair Williams, and Chair Shore in favor; Smith in dissent; and
none in abstention.

VPC RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS

1. The south facing mass of the building(s) oriented to the Grand Canal shall
incorporate Walkable Urban Code Frontage Types described in Section 1305
for a minimum 40 percent of the building face(s), as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. For the purpose applying the above provisions,
the above shall be treated as a Secondary Frontage with regard to glazing.

2. The south facing mass of the building(s) oriented to the Grand Canal shall
contain architectural embellishments, design detailing, and / or space
programming to activate and provide visual access onto the canal, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Examples of
appropriate enhancements may include textural changes, offsets, recesses,
variation in window size and location, overhang canopies, balconies with a
depth greater of than 3 feet, and amenities such as gathering spaces.

3. Between the southern mass of the building and the south property line (the
Grand Canal right-of-way), the developer shall plant minimum 3-inch caliper,
large canopy shade trees, at a minimum frequency of 25 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.

4. The provisions of Section 1310.A.2 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance shall
apply to require shaded open space of which a minimum 50 percent shall be
situated adjacent to the south property line (the Grand Canal right-of-way), as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

5. No solid perimeter wall greater than 36 inches in height shall be oriented to
and located within 30 feet of the south property line (the Grand Canal right-of-
way), as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6. The developer shall provide traffic calming to slow vehicle traffic exiting the
property with specific regard to pedestrian safety on the public sidewalk, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. The developer shall provide a minimum of two direct and accessible pedestrian
connections from the amenity areas located south of the building mass to the
shared use path along the Grand Canal Trail, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. The developer shall provide and maintain the following bicycle infrastructure as

Page 346
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. A bicycle repair station (fix-it station) along the southern edge of the
site, visible, and accessible from the public sidewalk and / or the Grand
Canal Trail. The station shall include but not limited to: standard repair
tools affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump; and a bicycle repair
stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while adjusting the
bike.

b. All required bicycle parking for multifamily use, per Section 1307.H.6.d
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be secured parking.

c. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be provided at
a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit with a maximum of 50 spaces near
entrances of buildings and installed per the requirements of Section
1306.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

9. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

10. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone A, on panel
1740 L of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated October 16, 2013. The
following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain boundary
limits on the Grading and Drainage plan and ensure that impacts to the
proposed facilities have been considered, following the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3); this
includes, but not limited to provisions in the latest versions of the
Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of Public Works Department for review
and approval of Floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved CLOMR-F or CLOMR
prior to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit.

11. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be

Page 347
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

12. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

13. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

Page 348
Attachment D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
February 4, 2021

ITEM NO: 13
DISTRICT NO.: 4
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-56-20-4
Location: Southeast corner of 3rd Avenue and Coolidge Street
From: R-3 and R-5
To: WU Code T5:5 UT
Acreage: 3.29
Proposal: Multifamily residential
Applicant: Trinsic Residential Group, T. Gosselink
Owner: Donor Network of Arizona
Representative: Jason Morris , Withey Morris, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Alhambra 1/26/2021 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 15-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Alhambra Village Planning
Committee recommendation, with an additional stipulation.

Motion Discussion: Commissioner Howard made a MOTION to approve Z-56-20-4, per
the Alhambra Village Planning Committee recommendation, with an additional
stipulation as read into the record.

Commissioner McCabe seconded.

Chairwoman Shank asked if there was any questions or comments.

Commissioner Busching made a substitute motion to continue Z-56-20-4.

Chairwoman Shank asked for a second. There was no second, therefore the motion
failed.

Motion details: Commissioner Howard made a MOTION to approve Z-56-20-4, per the
Alhambra Village Planning Committee recommendation, with an additional stipulation as
read into the record.

Maker: Howard
Second: McCabe
Vote: 7-1 (Busching)
Absent: Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes

Page 349
Findings:

1. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map designation of
Residential 15+ Dwelling Units Per Acre and the TOD Strategic Policy
Framework Minor Urban Center Place Type designation.

2. The development advances the vision and recommendations contained in the
Uptown Transit Oriented Development Plan and will support pedestrian
oriented development near the light rail and multiple urban bikeways.

3. The proposal will create additional housing options for the significant number
of residents in the Uptown TOD District.

Stipulations:

1. The south facing mass of the building(s) oriented to the Grand Canal shall
incorporate Walkable Urban Code Frontage Types described in Section 1305
for a minimum 40 percent of the building face(s), as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. For the purpose applying the above provisions,
the above shall be treated as a Secondary Frontage with regard to glazing.

2. The south facing mass of the building(s) oriented to the Grand Canal shall
contain architectural embellishments, design detailing, and / or space
programming to activate and provide visual access onto the canal, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Examples of
appropriate enhancements may include textural changes, offsets, recesses,
variation in window size and location, overhang canopies, balconies with a
depth greater of than 3 feet, and amenities such as gathering spaces.

3. Between the southern mass of the building and the south property line (the
Grand Canal right-of-way), the developer shall plant minimum 3-inch caliper,
large canopy shade trees, at a minimum frequency of 25 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.

4. The provisions of Section 1310.A.2 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance shall
apply to require shaded open space of which a minimum 50 percent shall be
situated adjacent to the south property line (the Grand Canal right-of-way), as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

5. No solid perimeter wall greater than 36 inches in height shall be oriented to
and located within 30 feet of the south property line (the Grand Canal right-of-
way), as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6. The developer shall provide traffic calming to slow vehicle traffic exiting the
property with specific regard to pedestrian safety on the public sidewalk, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. The developer shall provide a minimum of two direct and accessible pedestrian
connections from the amenity areas located south of the building mass to the

Page 350
shared use path along the Grand Canal Trail, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. The developer shall provide and maintain the following bicycle infrastructure as
described below and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. A bicycle repair station (fix-it station) along the southern edge of the
site, visible, and accessible from the public sidewalk and / or the
Grand Canal Trail. The station shall include but not limited to:
standard repair tools affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump;
and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin
freely while adjusting the bike.

b. All required bicycle parking for multifamily use, per Section
1307.H.6.d of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be secured
parking.

c. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be
provided at a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit with a maximum of
50 spaces near entrances of buildings and installed per the
requirements of Section 1306.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

9. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

10. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone A, on panel
1740 L of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated October 16, 2013. The
following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain boundary
limits on the Grading and Drainage plan and ensure that impacts to
the proposed facilities have been considered, following the National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph
60.3); this includes, but not limited to provisions in the latest
versions of the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of Public Works Department for
review and approval of Floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved CLOMR-F or
CLOMR prior to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit.

11. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be

Page 351
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

12. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

13. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

14. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Tamra Ingersoll at (602) 534-6648, TTY use 7-1-1.

Page 352
Attachment E

Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
155-34-051 155-34-049 155-34-011 155-34-008
155-34-119 155-34-087A
155-34-118
155-34-050 155-34-048 155-34-010 155-34-009
I 155-34-117 155-34-116 155-34-155 155-34-088

155-34-046 155-34-045 155-34-007 155-34-004
155-34-104
155-34-115 155-34-114
155-34-084
155-34-047 155-34-044 155-34-006 155-34-005
0 155-34-113 155-34-112
155-34-107
HAZELWOOD ST

Legend
155-34-002
Signed Petition
50 155-34-041
155-34-042 155-34-003
MINNEZONA AVE
155-34-086
155-34-111A 155-34-108A
Lots/Tracts/Condos

155-34-105
Zoning Petition Area

155-34-043 155-34-040 155-34-001
155-34-085

100 Feet
Proposed Amendment Area

3RD AVE

155-29-078D 155-29-078E
155-29-077C
155-29-004A
155-29-003
155-29-079
155-29-001 155-29-002
155-29-076

VALERIE PL
155-29-005A
155-29-071 155-29-070
155-29-068B

155-29-006A
155-29-073A
Attachment F
155-29-072
155-29-009 155-29-008A
155-29-007A

155-29-012A
155-29-066A 155-29-065
155-29-011A
155-29-013A 155-29-067A
155-29-064
2ND DR
COOLIDGE ST

155-29-132A

155-29-060B
155-29-010A 155-29-017A
155-29-060C
155-29-014A
# of Lots/Tracts/Condos:155-29-019A
15/19 = 79%

155-29-015A
3/4 VOTE REQUIRED
155-29-016A

Petition Verification Map 155-29-059A 155-29-061 HIGHLAND AVE

155-29-021A 155-29-069B
155-29-018 155-29-020A
155-29-055A 155-29-056
prepared

2ND AVE
% Area = 2.61ac./8.80ac. = 30%
155-29-022A 155-29-054D 155-29-053B
for Z-56-20-4
Map Page

356 by City of Phoenix, Planning and Development Services Dept. 2/12/2021

155-29-025A
155-29-026A 155-29-024A
155-29-023A
CITY OF PHOENIX
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

FORM TO REQUEST PC to CC
I HEREBY REQUEST THAT THE CC HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON:
MARCH 3, 2021

APPLICATION NO/ Z-56-20-4 (SIGNATURE ON ORIGINAL IN FILE)
LOCATION Southeast corner of opposition x applicant
3rd Avenue and
Coolidge Street
Phoenix, AZ 85013 PC 2/4/2021 308 West Coolidge Street
Phoenix, AZ 85013

PC DATE STREET/ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
TO PC/CC CC 3/3/2021
HEARING Ron Szematowicz
602-748-5607
Pjharveytrack12@yahoo.com

CC DATE NAME / PHONE / EMAIL
REASON FOR REQUEST:

Petition for Three Quarter Vote on Rezoning Case No. Z-56-20-4. (Sent via email February
11, 2021.)

RECEIVED BY: Racelle Escolar RECEIVED ON: 2/11/2021

Alan Stephenson
Joshua Bednarek
Tricia Gomes
Racelle Escolar
Stephanie Vasquez
Leah Swanton
Vikki Cipolla-Murillo
Danielle Jordan
Ra’Desha Williams
Village Planner
Samantha Keating
Paul M. Li
GIS
Applicant

Page 357
From: Racelle Escolar
To: RS
Cc: dillon.hall.mtaz@gmail.com; Victoria C Murrillo
Subject: FW: 3/4 City Council Petition Signatures
Date: Thursday, February 11, 2021 2:29:42 PM
Attachments: 34 City Council Petition Signatures with Icon.pdf
34 City Council Petition Signatures Page 2 with Ron Carpenter of 302 W Minnezona.pdf
Mark Daniels, GG ICON LLC.pdf
Importance: High

Hello Ron,

I have received your request for a ¾ vote on Rezoning Case No. Z-56-20-4. We will process this and
let you know if a ¾ vote will be required.

Thanks,

Racelle Escolar, AICP
Planner III

Planning and Development Department
Planning Division
(602) 534-2864

From: R S
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 2:17 PM
To: Racelle Escolar
Cc: dillon.hall.mtaz@gmail.com
Subject: 3/4 City Council Petition Signatures

Hello Racelle

Attached are two pages of signatures including the Icon next door to the proposed project. With the Icon,
I think we have should have covered our 20% land and we are over 75% of land owners I believe. Thank
you. I cc'ed Dillon in case there is anything else you need today.

Ron

Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
To whom it may concern:

Goodman Real Estate has been contracted to provide Asset Management
services to Icon On Central (entity name – GG ICON LLC) located at 77 West
Coolidge Street, Phoenix, AZ 85013. As the Investment Portfolio Manager
assigned to Icon On Central I am responsible to act as agent for ownership for all
issues pertaining to the Icon on Central property. If you have any questions I can
be reached at the contact info listed below.

Sincerely,

Mark Daniels | Investment Portfolio Manager
GOODMAN REAL ESTATE
8400 Normandale Lake Blvd.| Suite 920 | Bloomington, MN 55438
M: 952.451.1206
mdaniels@goodmanre.com |www.goodmanre.com

Page 361
Attachment G

From: pamlperry@cox.net pamlperry@cox.net
To: Nick Klimek
Subject: rezone 3.29 acres located at the southeast corner of 3rd Avenue and Coolidge Street
Date: Monday, January 25, 2021 2:55:26 PM

Alhambra Village Planning Committee

Regarding: 7. Z-56-20-4: Presentation, discussion, and possible recommendation regarding a
request to rezone 3.29 acres located at the southeast corner of 3rd Avenue and
Coolidge Street from R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) and R-5 (Multifamily
Residence District) to WU Code T5:5 UT (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 5:5,
Transit Uptown Character Area) to allow multifamily residential.
The Planning Commission will consider this request on February 4, 2021.

The proposed zoning change requested by developers to meet WU code benefits for the
property that used to be known as the donor network site will indeed justify the time and
money spent developing this code. However, the changes proposed fail to meet a walkable
urban situation for residents along Coolidge street. The development would be more
appropriate along a main thoroughfare with existing sidewalks and perhaps even bike lanes.
Density of this level is also questionable in a neighborhood already afforded zoning for level
commercial residential 3 and 5 which was in place when the neighborhood was registered on
The National Historic Register.

The largest concern voiced by residents is generally described as ‘traffic’. To be sure we
understand and observe daily the increased ratio of cars to driveway parking available or
even cars to designed, planned parking in recent multi-unit developments.   Streets are
parked bumper to bumper: vehicles, both sides. Cyclists, pedestrians, runners, dog
walkers, baby strollers all use active traffic lanes. Delivery vehicles are forced to
double park… access for police, ambulance fire equipment is limited and restricted.
Traffic is sometimes defined as the number of trips in and out of a property. More and
more this traffic includes all sorts of deliveries. Currently neighbors are delivered of
something more than half a dozen times a day. Multiply that by two hundred and too
many units! The driveway for this property becomes ingress/ egress for hundreds of
deliveries and an increasingly noticeable traffic hazard for cyclists, pedestrians, dog
walker, toddlers on tiny bikes, moms with strollers…
It is projected that development residents will avail themselves to grand canalscape
project and light rail as a means of going places, but for those excursions to retail
opportunities (some not so very far, but not on canal or train lines) and others when
delivery is not used, people make trips in their cars. Their guests park where there is
space…increased vehicle trips, count them again!
There are limited sidewalks on Coolidge Street. All bike, pedestrian, dog walkers,
children waiting for busses, yes, this will happen again, runners, children going to
school, (there are several proximate), stroller-brigade, toddlers on tiny bikes with
training wheels and parents following along slowly along at decreased rates of speed to
supervise, or just folks going out for a meal or coffee must walk in the street. They run
the gamut along both sides of the thoroughfare of stationary parking, travel lanes
cluttered with delivery vehicles, moving vans, ubers and other gig parcel and package
delivery, trash collectors, city vehicles, cut thru traffic as well as locals simply arriving,
or leaving their homes exiting driveways… . This hardly qualifies as “WALKABLE”.
It will be a very unsafe and not walkable district.

Page 362
Extracting a vehicle from a driveway with sight line impeded by what becomes double
parked vehicles (only for a moment, let me drop off this package…) living in the
neighborhood becomes less and less conducive to personal safety: pedestrians and
vehicles two or 4 wheeled.

Who knows what sort of lurkers find all this stationary parking a good place to while away
time waiting to steal packages delivered or spring on unsuspecting victims…? Is this
“WALKABLE” ? Or Safe? Calls for service by fire trucks, ambulances, and police are all
impeded.

Your developer is investing client’s dollars. He wants to make them a good return, but does
this need to be at the expense of livability in an Historic District? Current zoning may be dated
to earlier planning goals, but perhaps they better reflects the multiple uses of pedestrian,
bicycle and automotive traffic that prevail in our ever-denser central core. Walking and biking
along Coolidge are a chancy thing sometimes already. Let’s not go out our way to make it
worse.

Thank you, Pam Perry 304 W. Coolidge St.

P.S. In case this is not clear, I do not support these rezoning efforts for the old donor network
property!

Page 363
From: RS
To: Nick Klimek
Subject: Rezoning effort at Coolidge and 3rd Ave(Meeting Jan 26th... Item: 126 771 4317)
Date: Monday, January 25, 2021 2:49:22 PM

There is a rezoning effort happening within my neighborhood at 3rd Ave and Coolidge St. I
beg you not to allow the zoning change as it will deeply affect the traffic and parking in the
neighborhood as well as a create a hazard on the 3rdAve bike path.  I am not against the
project as much as I am against the increase in units.  Its too much added traffic and parking
into the neighborhood.  Please hear me out.

The developers are trying to increase zoning from the current R3-R5 to a WU which would
basically allow and 4+ story building increase from about 137 units to 213ish.  This apartment
complex would be situated in the  middle of the historic neighborhood rather than on a major
road (like Camelback or Central).  Currently standing in the proposed space is an office
building (formerly Organ Donors) with a private park that the neighborhood has enjoyed for
the 20+ years I have lived here.  The proposed project is at the corner of 3rd Ave and Coolidge
along the canal which coincides with the 3rdAve bike path.

Before covid, I enjoyed walking to businesses and watering hole landmarks but I still
owned a vehicle the entire time as most residents do.  While walkability is an important tool
for those of us that live in the neighborhood, most of us still need to drive to work or the store
or to get out of town.  Just because people walk occasionally does not mean that they do not
own a vehicle and use it.    On top of that, this apartment complex will be very close to the
sidewalk (like Elevation) on a neighborhood street not having the same easement houses are
required.  The front of end of the complex will face the canal while we in the neighborhood
get its backside.  We need easement within our neighborhood.  I understand the importance of
city growth, but cities that grow need to also ensure there is ample green space for the
congested masses living within such areas.  If nothing else give us that easement.

If you look at other apartment complexes in the area such as the Pavilions (Campbell and
Central), Elevation (Coolidge and Central), the Station (Central and Monterosa), you will see
cars constantly parked along the road day and night even with ample parking garages.  It
creates a hazardous congestion and unsightly view of the neighborhood.  Since Elevation was
built here on Coolidge and Central, the traffic on Coolidge St has increased with drivers flying
down the street even with speed bumps.  We also have a constant problem of cars stopping to
load or unload dangerously close to Central.  There is nothing to stop the proposed
development from having irresponsible parking and traffic from inundating the
neighborhood.  The increase in variance is going to add more cars and more
congestion.  Elevation is attractive on the website and from Central Ave but from Coolidge St
is a block monstrosity right on top of the sidewalk with a parking garage and a bunch of
parked cars all around it.  There is nothing attractive about it from Coolidge St.

While I understand I cannot stop the development nor do I necessarily want to, I just want the
city council to understand this complex is going directly into the neighborhood and has no
direct access to a major through street (like Central and Camelback).  It must cut through this
neighborhood.  The developers will try to sell to you people won't need a car, but I implore
you to look at the parking around the apartment complexes I have mentioned.  Its
Phoenix.  Most people own vehicles.  We in the neighborhood are already having to sacrifice
this private park that added much charm and use to an otherwise busy area in Phoenix but an

Page 364
additional 75 units will not help us maintain control of neighborhood streets or the added
congestion of parking.

Sincerely

Ron Szematowicz

home owner living at 308 W Coolidge St

pjharveytrack12@yahoo.com

Page 365
From: frank paoletti
To: Nick Klimek
Subject: Rezoning Z-56-20-4
Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 10:14:16 AM

Why has the zoning change for the area at 3rd Ave and Coolidge St now state there are to be 165 units minimum to
no maximum. This is not what the developer and lawyer stated in our neighborhood meeting. Also, what about the
parking, no one has ever addressed that and no one from the city has come to see the congestion at the end of
Coolidge St because of the other 2 apartment buildings? Nothing has been done with that problem that already
exists. Will 3rd Ave and Coolidge St have no street parking signs along with fines for violating the parking rules?
Thank you,
Frank Paoletti
449 W. Coolidge St

Page 366
Racelle Escolar

From: gbvalladao@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 12:49 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition to Case #13 Z-56-20-4

I write in opposition to the rezoning application hearing for rezoning 3rd Avenue & Collidge from R‐5/R‐3 zoning to
Walkable Urban Code zoning. While I am not opposed to the development of the site, it should be within the confines
of it’s current zoning. I oppose the request for the following reasons:

 Pierson Place is one of the few historic neighborhoods in the urban core and Central/Uptown Phoenix and
fabric of it should be preserved if at all possible
 WC Code T5:5T was intended for high traffic urban mixed‐use districts with retail/office/dining uses like Central
Avenue, not the middle of a residential historic neighborhood. Even if a rezone is allowed it should be limited
to either:
o T3:2 since it is a residential neighborhood with single family homes and duplexes with a maximum
height of 30 feet
o T4:3 an area characterized by single and multi‐family residences with a maximum height of 40 feet.
 The 3rd Avenue & Coolidge location is a quiet dead end street that was never intended to accommodate the
heavy vehicular traffic the project will generate. While a traffic study has repeatedly been referenced, it has
not been shared with the neighborhood.
 The developer request to increase the unit count from the currently zoned 136 to 218 adds 80 units to the
project increasing the unit count by 59% with no justification as to why it is needed.
 Increasing the height limitations from 48 feet to 56 feet will impair the sunlight on the north side of Coolidge as
well as impede the southern site lines for homes throughout the neighborhood.
 Overflow parking from a project this size will spill into the single family homes on Coolidge, Hazelwood and 3rd
avenue which is can be witnessed daily on the streets adjacent to The Elevations on Central, The Icon and the
Lexington.

Again, I am not opposed to development of the site, but there is no reason a project should be built beyond the
currently zoning requirements which allows for 136 units and 48 feet of height on the R‐5 zoned parcels.

I thank you for your consideration.

Regards – Greg Valladao

Greg Valladao
VALCOR Commercial
602‐697‐0078

Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows 10

Page1 367
Racelle Escolar

From: pamlperry@cox.net pamlperry@cox.net
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 12:58 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: case number Z-56-20-4

Planning Committee

The proposed zoning change requested by developers to meet WU code benefits for the property that used to be known
as the donor network site will indeed justify the time and money spent developing this code. However, the changes
proposed fail to make a walkable urban situation for all residents along Coolidge street. The WU development would
certainly be more appropriate along a main thoroughfare Camelback, Central,7th Ave. with existing sidewalks and
perhaps even bike lanes.

Pierson Place Historic District neighborhood already is afforded zoning for commercial residential 3 and 5 which was in
place when the neighborhood was registered on The National Historic Register. Other in‐fil developers are expected to
use these parameters.

Your developer is investing client’s dollars. He wants to make them a good return, but does this need to be at the
expense of walkability in an Historic District? Current zoning may be dated to earlier planning goals, but perhaps they
better reflect the multiple uses of pedestrian, bicycle and automotive traffic that prevail in our ever‐denser central
core. Walking and biking along Coolidge are a chancy thing sometimes already. Let’s not go out our way to make it
worse.

the frequently cited developers of proposed and existing multi‐family projects will not be afforded the privilege of WU
code benefits, having to work withing current zoning. Any developer can add gates to fencing along the canal to avail
residents to easy access to that local feature. Gates in fences is not rocket science for WU code developers only. There
is little excuse to make special exceptions for this project.

The major concern voiced by residents is generally described as ‘traffic’. We understand and observe daily the increased
street parking. Streets are parked bumper to bumper: vehicles, both sides. Cyclists, pedestrians, runners, dog walkers,
baby strollers all use active traffic lanes. Delivery vehicles are forced to double park… access for police, ambulance fire
equipment become more and more limited and restricted. We are seeing increasing numbers of auto related crime as
well.

 There are limited sidewalks on Coolidge Street. All bike, pedestrian, dog walkers, children waiting for busses,
yes, this will happen again, runners, children going to school, (there are several proximate), stroller‐brigade,
toddlers on tiny bikes with training wheels and parents following along slowly along at decreased rates of speed
to supervise, or just folks going out for a meal or coffee must walk in the street. They run the gamut along both
sides of the thoroughfare of stationary parking, travel lanes cluttered with delivery vehicles, moving vans, ubers
and other gig parcel and package delivery, trash collectors, city vehicles, cut thru traffic as well as locals simply
arriving, or leaving their homes exiting driveways… . This hardly qualifies as “WALKABLE”. It will be a very
unsafe and not walkable district.
 Extracting a vehicle from a driveway with sight line impeded by double parked vehicles (only for a moment, let
me drop off this package…) living in the neighborhood becomes less and less conducive to personal safety:
pedestrians and vehicles two or 4 wheeled.
 Who knows what sort of lurkers find all this stationary parking a good place to while away time waiting to steal
packages delivered, break into parked cars, or spring on unsuspecting victims…? Is this “WALKABLE” ? Or Safe?
We are already seeing increased crime in automobiles parked along the east end of Coolidge, and this can be
expected to move west with parked cars!
 Calls for service by fire trucks, ambulances, and police are all impeded.

Page1 368
Thank you, Pam Perry 304 W. Coolidge St.

P.S. In case this is not clear, I do not support these rezoning efforts for the old donor network property!

Page2 369
Racelle Escolar

From: Monica Kearns
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:22 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Rezoning case No.Z-56-20-4 WU code T5: 5 UT

good afternoon, regardless this Project we are on opposition, no only the time that will take to build 24 months, we are
families who has to work and we want to rest after work and on our days off too,but also the traffic, our privacy,
because those apartments will face at our houses and when the highschools open again it will be a big, big problem of
traffic I am talking about 2 highschools beside businesses around and other traffic, we are concern about people will
parking on front of our houses specially on the weekends, the noise of the traffic, this is a HISTORIC DISTRICT and we
want to keep this neighborhood that way, WE DONT WANT MORE APARTMENTS AROUND, I INVITE YOU TO STAY ONE
DAY LOOKING AT THE TRAFFIC ON CENTRAL AVE, CAMELBACK RD AND 7 AV. we are living here, we see it every day, I
hope we all from this neighborhood hope to consider our petition to not to build more apartments.

Thank for your time, sincerely:

MM.

Page1 370
Racelle Escolar

From: R S
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 9:29 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Rezoning on Coolidge St and 3rd Ave 56-20-4 item 13
Attachments: project 56-20-4 is the Red boxed area.png

To the Phoenix Planning Commission,

I ask you to consider the gravity of the zoning change on case 56-20-4 in this Thursday’s
agenda. The property in question is not on a major thoroughfare, but deep within the historic
Pierson Place neighborhood.

The developers are asking to go from a R3-R5 to a WU because the site in question is on the
canal. While that is true, the area of the canal that the said project would be built on is relatively
small. It is only four to five historic house properties long. In return they want to increase units
from 137 to about 215, which comes out to 275 beds (as there are two bedroom units), increase the
height to 56’ in the middle of the neighborhood, have next to no easement on the street and not
supply adequate parking. On top of that, the project would not face the neighborhood. We would
get its backside. I have attached a copy of a map of the said property.

Please take the time to go the site and inspect the canal area, the bike path and the neighborhood
and you will see this is too great a sacrifice on height, easement, traffic and parking for the limited
canal scaping they will accomplish. Let them use their already in place R3-R5 zoning to help ease
traffic congestion and parking overflow.

Please vote NO on the said project. It will irreversibly hurt the historic neighborhood in which will
reside within. Again it is not on a major street, Camelback, 7th Ave and Central are all a good
distance away and 3rd Ave does not cut through for purposes of limiting traffic.

Sincerely

Ron Szematowicz

home owner living at 308 W Coolidge St

pjharveytrack12@yahoo.com
602-748-5607

Page1 371
Page 372
Racelle Escolar

From: Thomas Rice
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 3:16 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Reasoning Case No Z-56-20-4

Hello,

My name is Thomas Rice; I live at 320 W Hazelwood St. I am writing this letter to oppose the zoning change from R‐3 and
R‐5 to WU Code T5:5 UT. I oppose this for the following reasons:

Not enough parking

Intrudes on Pierson Place Historic Neighborhood

Insufficient access

Takes away a green space in the neighborhood

Too congested

Thank you for your time!

Thomas D. Rice
Owner/Operator
Javelina Tree Work LLC
480‐208‐1974

Page1 373
Racelle Escolar

From: grosso9377@cox.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 3:34 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Oppsition to 56-20-4

To whom it concern (Phoenix Planning Commission),

My name is Michael Grosso, owner of the property at 303 W Coolidge. I am in opposition of the planning and zoning of
the proposed property at 3 ave. and Coolidge.

My concerns are:

1. 218 unit complex built on the edges of Coolidge and 3 ave, to large of a footprint for the area.

2. The building will not allow any parking on Coolidge or limited which turns the street into a single lane
road. Dangerous for riding bikes and walking.

3. Increases the walking traffic and more chance for crime.

4. Coolidge Ave. is a cut‐through for 7 ave to Central, which could be dangerous for residents.

5. The community is going to suffer with all the added walking traffic.

Thank You for you time please do not rezone the location.

Page1 374
Racelle Escolar

From: Jeff Rahm
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 4:41 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: RE Application #: Z-56-20-4

Attn Planning Commission:
I own a home (306 West Coolidge) just down the street from the proposed apartment development site.
While I am all for growth & expansion, I have reservations with the proposed WU rezone. I foresee a
heavy increase in vehicular traffic, especially on Coolidge, Hazelwood & Highland. Central Ave only allows for a
right turn heading south. To travel north, the only option is to drive to 7th Ave on either street and make a
right. Again, I am all for growth, but just want to be sure that the traffic congestion issue is carefully
considered.
Thank you,
Jeff Rahm

Jeff Rahm • Sr. Digital Media Planner/Buyer
To help protect y ou r priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
OH Partners

o. 602.228.2377
OHPARTNERS.COM [ohpartners.com]
[ohpartners.com]

Page1 375
Racelle Escolar

From: Sarah Simpson
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 4:53 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Rezoning Case No: Z-56-20-4

Hello! I am a resident at 308 W. Hazlewood St. and I am writing to request a reduction in the size of the multifamily
residential dwelling that is planned for the Southeast corner of 3rd avenue and Coolidge. Case Z‐56‐20. Please reduce
the size to 80 units. Please let me know if you have any questions!

‐Sarah Simpson
(602)405‐6943

Page1 376
Racelle Escolar

From: Bill Wells
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 5:15 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition to Application No. Z-56-20-4

I am opposed to Application No. Z‐56‐20‐4 to change the zoning from R‐3 and R‐5 to WU Code T5:5 UT located on the
Southeast corner of 3rd Avenue and Coolidge Street for several reasons including:

a) constructing a multifamily residential property with no maximum units allowed will significantly increase the traffic on
3 residential streets (Coolidge, Hazelwood, and 3rd Avenue)
b) increased traffic will increase the likelihood of pedestrian getting harmed as this is primarily a residential area
consisting of families with children and older adults
c) Other than a standard size sidewalk along the eastern edge of 3rd Avenue there is no public sidewalk on Coolidge,
Hazelwood, and other nearby residential streets. The proposal is an extremely dangerous mix of increased pedestrian
traffic walking in the street and an increase in vehicle traffic
d) Access to and from the Grand Canal pathway is from 3rd Avenue and Hazelwood which already stresses the
pedestrian and vehicle traffic in the area
e) Increasing the population density within the area will increase levels of crime and lower public safety
f) Parking along Hazelwood, Coolidge, and other nearby residential streets is restricted but does not appear to be
enforced. Additional residents and vehicles will take advantage of unauthorized street parking.

Until such time as the proponent can provide studies that these reasons have been addressed in their proposal or
provide mitigation measures to offset or compensate for this reasons, I am opposed to this application.

Regards,

Bill Wells
498 W Hazelwood St
Phoenix, AZ 85013
bdtgwells@icloud.com

Page1 377
Racelle Escolar

From: Lina Money
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 5:53 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition / 56-20-4, item 13

Zoning case 56‐20‐4. Item 13.

Dear Sir and Madam,

I am deeply troubled to know that there is a high possibility of a new build of apartment complex in our small historic
neighborhood, which we the neighbors have been in charge of making it better, cleaner , more safe and friendlier place
to live. My family and I have been living on Coolidge st since 2007 and we have been part of the transitions in the hood.
I have two small kids and two dogs, as a mother I am very concern of rezoning the corner lot and allowing some Texan
investor developer to make money from the work we did all these years (to maintain and make it a better
neighbourhood) without being considerate to the people and pets in the Pierson Place. We as human have
responsibilities to make life better for all and not just for one company!!! Life is not all about money and we have to
make the right steps to protect each other and not to allow this rezoning!
I deeply ask you to view this case as a person who lives in Pierson Place and not just as an outsider.
If they are allowed to build they should be limited to the current zoning and they should provide place ( trees, green
grass , play area for the families in the neighborhood. We are already overwhelmed by cars parked on the side walks and
fast drivers and lets not forget that 3 ave has a bike lane used by many to commute . It will put a lot of people in
danger!
This letter represents the families living at 510, 505 and 506 W Coolidge Street!

Yours truly,
Lina Money
Tania Bachelot
Olga Pegkova

Lina Money

Page1 378

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

Meeting phoenix-pdf-2021-03-17 complete

1. ¶ Summary

Item text

Supporting documents

2. ¶ Liquor License - Special Event - M.U.S.I.C. Foundation of Arizona, Inc.

Item text

Supporting documents

3. ¶ Liquor License - Longshots Bar & Grill

Item text

Supporting documents

4. ¶ Liquor License - 810 Billiards & Bowling

Item text

Supporting documents

5. ¶ Liquor License - Carioca Shell #68

Item text

Supporting documents

6. ¶ Liquor License - Morning Squeeze

Item text

Supporting documents

7. ¶ Liquor License - Gary's Smoke Gift & More

Item text

Supporting documents

8. ¶ Liquor License - II Bosco Pizza

Item text

Supporting documents

9. ¶ Liquor License - QuikTrip #1441

Item text

Supporting documents

10. ¶ Liquor License - Sabertooth Astrobar

Item text

Supporting documents

11. ¶ Liquor License - The Vault

Item text

Supporting documents

12. ¶ ***REQUEST TO WITHDRAW (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** (CONTINUED FROM

Item text

Supporting documents

23. ¶ Settlement of City’s Claim Against Compass Airlines for Fuel Spill at Phoenix

Item text

Supporting documents

24. ¶ Canvass of Vote - March 9, 2021 Runoff Election

Item text

Supporting documents

25. ¶ Third-Party Assessment of Phoenix Police Department Demonstration and

Item text

Supporting documents

26. ¶ Bloomberg Philanthropies 2021 Global Mayors Challenge Application

Item text

Supporting documents

27. ¶ Grant of Public Utility Easement on City-owned Property for Construction of Well

Item text

Supporting documents

28. ¶ Acceptance and Dedication of Deeds and Easements for Public Utility, Roadway

Item text

Supporting documents

29. ¶ Acceptance of Easements for Drainage Purposes (Ordinance S-47371)

Item text

Supporting documents

30. ¶ Acceptance of Easements for Vehicular Non-Access and Drainage Purposes

Item text

Supporting documents

31. ¶ Acceptance and Dedication of Easements and Deeds for Public Utility and

Item text

Supporting documents

32. ¶ Property Management Services Agreement for Village Shopping Center -

Item text

Supporting documents

33. ¶ Cooling Tower Water Treatment Services - IFB 16-118B (Ordinance S-47379)

Item text

Supporting documents

34. ¶ Generator Maintenance, Inspection, and Repair - IFB 16-110A (Ordinance S-

Item text

Supporting documents

35. ¶ Amend and Allow Additional Expenditures for the City of Mesa Contract for

Item text

Supporting documents

36. ¶ Motorola Regional Wireless Cooperative Service Agreement - RFA 16-130B

Item text

Supporting documents

37. ¶ Laboratory Equipment and Supplies Cooperative Contract Agreements -