For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on September 4,

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of September 4, 2024, for
review, correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
Street, 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.





ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: February 5, 2025
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee

Councilman Robinson recommends the following for appointment:

Alyson Slobodzian
Ms. Slobodzian is the Government Affairs Director of Phoenix REALTORS and a
resident of District 6. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire February 5, 2027.

Alhambra Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Guardado recommends the following for appointment:

Lance Vallo
Mr. Vallo is a retiree and a resident of District 5. He replaces Pamela Fitzgerald for a
term to expire on February 5, 2027.

Maryvale Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Guardado recommends the following for appointment:

Andrea Ramirez
Ms. Ramirez is a substitute teacher and a resident of District 5. She fills a vacancy for a
term to expire February 5, 2027.




Neighborhood Block Watch Fund Oversight Committee

Councilman Galindo-Elvira recommends the following for appointment:

Renee Dominguez
Ms. Dominguez is a resident of District 7. She replaces Terry Perez for a term to expire
February 5, 2027.

Francisca Yvette Madero
Ms. Yvette Madero is a case worker for the City of Phoenix and a resident of District 7.
She replaces Gabriela Garza for a term to expire February 5, 2027.

Planning Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Andrea Odegard-Begay
Ms. Odegard-Begay is a Senior Associate at Hazen and Sawyer and a resident of
District 3. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire February 5, 2029.







Report

Liquor License - Rob's Smoke Shop - District 2

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 322935.

Summary

Applicant
Roni Shoris, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
19401 N. Cave Creek Road, #31A
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2

This request is for a new liquor license for a tobacco shop. This location was
previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
This location requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales and a Zoning
Clearance to allow tobacco oriented retail sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is February 11, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.





Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have extensive experience as a beverag server a proven track record of responsible
alcohol service. Understanding of all relevant liquor laws and regulations, and a
commitment to upholding the heighst standards of customer service and community
safety. Also, hold basic and management alcohol certificate.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It will significantly benefit the community by providing a convenient place for residents
to purchase alcoholic beverages. Also, filling a gap in local options and contributing
positively to the overall social environment.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment - Rob's Smoke Shop - Data
Attachment - Rob's Smoke Shop - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: ROBS SMOKE SHOP
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 2

Liquor Store 9 4 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 4

Restaurant 12 3 1

Club 14 1 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 69.85 72.39

Violent Crimes 12.31 9.42 7.96

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 64

Total Violations 74 97




Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6169001 1123 80 10 5

6169002 1495 62 4 17

6169003 1399 22 11 4

6170001 1028 73 21 3

6170003 1050 72 0 35

6170004 1193 51 22 15

6170005 817 83 14 18

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: ROBS SMOKE SHOP
19401 N CAVE CREEK RD




Date: 1/10/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Beer Cave Drive Thru - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 323310.

Summary

Applicant
Abdelhamid Abdelkarim, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
14875 N. Cave Creek Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is February 9, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have managed liquor stores along with beer & wine stores over the years. My family
has been in this business for over 30 years and we always put the community first. I
have completed a DLLC-approved Title 4 Basic and Management Training Courses to
comply with all state rules and regulations and have no felony convictions. I am also a
bona fide Arizona resident and do not have plans of leaving anytime soon. Running a
business is not for everyone but rest assured that we will enforce all Liquor rules
strictly.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are community people and care about our neighborhood and its wellbeing. We
are very aware that there are stores in the areas who do not check ID for minors
especially when servicing them at the drive thru. Rest assure we are VERY strict when
it comes to IDing and do not tolerate any sort of minors attempting to purchase
alcohol. We are also very aware of minors saying they have pictures of their ID on their
phones but we know how easy it is to edit the year on a phone therefore we do not
accept digital IDs, only physical state IDs.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment - Beer Cave Drive Thru - Data
Attachment - Beer Cave Drive Thru - Map




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: BEER CAVE DRIVE THRU
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 2

Liquor Store 9 3 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 3

Restaurant 12 3 1

Club 14 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 80.04 81.84

Violent Crimes 12.31 17.91 16.24

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 69

Total Violations 74 120




Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1033061 921 18 28 32

1033062 2272 17 22 37

1035011 1381 67 5 23

1035012 999 80 8 26

1035024 884 66 13 5

1036061 1067 84 15 13

1036071 1285 83 3 18

1036072 1084 97 0 2

1036074 1299 89 0 3

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: BEER CAVE DRIVE THRU
14875 N CAVE CREEK RD




Date: 12/5/2024




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Tatemados - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 324035.

Summary

Applicant
Alan Delgado, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2333 N. 7th Street
Zoning Classification: C-2 CNSPD
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is February 15, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations



on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Tatemados (Series 12)
2919 N. 59th Avenue, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 11
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I currently own one restaurant with liquor license I have a clean record with no
violations. We are committed to the responsible sales of alcoholic beverages under
Arizona liquor laws our employees are trained in responsible liquor sales.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Many of our loyal clientele at our current location request to have alcoholic beverages,
at our new location, in order to please our locals, we ask to be granted a liquor
license.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment - Tatemados - Data
Attachment - Tatemados - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: TATEMADOS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Government 5 1 0

Bar 6 9 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 8 0

Liquor Store 9 6 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 9 2

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 38 8

Club 14 1 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 147.69 98.83

Violent Crimes 12.31 32.45 17.72

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 94

Total Violations 74 143




Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1105022 1216 28 19 23

1106004 1456 47 27 3

1117001 1792 45 32 41

1117003 1057 64 2 10

1117004 1227 75 20 21

1118001 742 44 28 5

1118004 671 62 6 6

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: TATEMADOS
2333 N 7TH ST




Date: 1/23/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Grand Canyon University - District 5

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Jennifer Duschek-Ross

Location
5346 N. 29th Avenue
Council District: 5

Function
Gala

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
February 21, 2025 - 4 p.m. to 11 p.m. / 1,200 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Big Bear Market - District 5

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 323340.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
7144 N. 35th Avenue, Ste. B
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 5

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit. This location requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is February 8, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The applicant and manager are trained in Title 4 liquor laws, and will ensure all staff is
also Title 4 trained. The applicant and managers will ensure all laws are abided by,
including all a”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location has been serving the community as a local convenience store with a
series 10 License. The applicant would like to continue providing the community and
long time customers the same product options that have been available at this
location.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment - Big Bear Market - Data
Attachment - Big Bear Market - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: BIG BEAR MARKET
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1

Liquor Store 9 2 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 5

Restaurant 12 3 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 159.12 210.82

Violent Crimes 12.31 33.59 44.79

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 162

Total Violations 74 290




Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1058001 1575 74 8 13

1058002 1458 81 9 36

1058003 1156 78 20 11

1059001 1697 50 0 42

1059002 2227 70 11 22

1069004 2444 60 3 27

1070001 1623 80 6 32

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: BIG BEAR MARKET
7144 N 35TH AVE




Date: 12/20/2024




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Madison District Educational Foundation, Inc.
(3/25/25) - District 6

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Matthew Gerber

Location
5601 N. 16th Street
Council District: 6

Function
Music Performance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
March 25, 2025 - 3 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 904 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Madison District Educational Foundation, Inc.
(4/26/25) - District 6

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Matthew Gerber

Location
5601 N. 16th Street
Council District: 6

Function
Gala

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
April 26, 2025 - 3 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 350 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Madison District Educational Foundation, Inc.
(5/5/25) - District 6

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Matthew Gerber

Location
5601 N. 16th Street
Council District: 6

Function
Music Performance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
May 5, 2025 - 3 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 904 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Rosie's House: A Music Academy for Children,
Inc. - District 6

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Kevin Gorman

Location
7344 N. 22nd Place
Council District: 6

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
March 1, 2025 - 5:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 200 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - The Great Arizona Puppet Theater, Inc. - District

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Lisa Pirro

Location
302 W. Latham Street
Council District: 7

Function
Theater Performance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
February 14, 2025 - 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 120 attendees
February 15, 2025 - 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 120 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Centrico - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 315749.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
101 N. 1st Avenue, Ste. 110
Zoning Classification: DTC - Business Core
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently being remodeled with plans to open in September 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is February 8, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the



State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Centrico (Series 12)
202 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 14
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owners have owned and operated Centrico on Central Ave for the last several
years. We ensure our employees attend the Title 4 basic liquor law class."

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Centrico has operated in the downtown area for several years. We are moving
locations to a bigger suite on 1st Ave. We would like to continue to offer our patrons
the amazing food and atmosphere of Centrico."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment - Centrico - Data
Attachment - Centrico - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.


Liquor License Data: CENTRICO
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 1

Microbrewery 3 5 1

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 7 4

Bar 6 47 33

Beer and Wine Bar 7 11 5

Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 15 2

Hotel 11 7 7

Restaurant 12 110 51

Club 14 3 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 251.67 383.65

Violent Crimes 12.31 70.67 90.12

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 34

Total Violations 74 55




Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1129002 815 37 22 24

1129003 1372 4 18 40

1131001 1015 7 8 28

1131002 1242 3 7 33

1141001 2299 16 37 44

1142001 1321 36 22 50

1143011 1389 22 15 57

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: CENTRICO
101 N 1ST AVE




Date: 1/23/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Laveen Community Council - District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Shamarr Lane

Location
8440 S. 35th Avenue
Council District: 8

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
February 22, 2025 - 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. / 5,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Arizona Roadtrip #1491 - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 313345.

Summary

Applicant
Camila Alarcon, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
3800 E. Sky Harbor Boulevard, Terminal 4, Concourse D
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a beer and wine store. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is February 9, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant or its commonly-controlled entities have operated with retail liquor licenses
across United States for several years. Applicant is committed to adhering to all
applicable liquor laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The business will increase options for beer and wine purchases for all travelers at
Phoenix's Sky Harbor International Airport. A liquor license is instrumental for the
business to prosper."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment - Arizona Roadtrip #1491 - Data
Attachment - Arizona Roadtrip #1491 - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: ARIZONA ROADTRIP #1491
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Bar 6 4 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 0

Conveyance 8 9 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 3 1

Restaurant 12 21 13

Club 14 6 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 65.15 105.83

Violent Crimes 12.31 3.6 4.35
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 43 0

Total Violations 74 0


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1138021 0 0 0 0

Average 0 61 13 19




Liquor License Map: ARIZONA ROADTRIP #1491
3800 E SKY HARBOR BLVD




Date: 1/24/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Monster Brewing Company - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 316808.

Summary

Applicant
Justin Stevens, Agent

License Type
Series 1 - In-State Producer

Location
1635 S. 43rd Avenue
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for an in-state producer. This location was
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is February 16, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the



applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The company meets all Federal, State, County, and City requirements to hold an
alcohol permit.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends disapproval of this application based on a Finance Department
recommendation for disapproval.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Maricopa County Air Quality and Environmental Regulations

For $222,450 in annual payment authority for various mandated regulatory fees and
permits for the Public Works Department. The Public Works Department manages fuel
sites, Citywide fleet and facilities, open and closed landfills, transfer stations, solid
waste collections, and other mandated entities that require various permits and fees to
maintain compliance with Maricopa County air quality and environmental health
regulations. The permits that Public Works maintain include Refuse Hauler, Authority to
Operate, Title V, Non-Title V, Recycle Variance, permitted fuel burning equipment, and
permitted fuel dispensing.








Report

Acceptance and Dedication of Easements for Sidewalk and Public Utility
Purposes (Ordinance S-51624) - Districts 2 & 6

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements for sidewalk and public
utility purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are
recorded via separate recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
MCR: 20240671266
Applicant and Grantor: Vaso Danilovic and Vidosava Danilovic; its successor and
assigns
Date: December 18, 2024
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 17825 N. 40th Place
APN: 215-16-074
File: 240055
Council District: 2

Easement (b)
MCR: 20240681890
Applicant and Grantor: RubyLee, L.L.C.; its successor and assigns
Date: December 23, 2024
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 3019 E. Hartford Avenue
APN: 214-03-040
File: 240083
Council District: 2

Easement (c)
MCR: 20250000252



Applicant and Grantor: 8220 N 14th Phoenix LLC.; its successor and assigns
Date: January 2, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 8220 N. 14th Street
APN: 160-11-004R
File: 240105
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Vehicle Wash Services Contract - IFB-25-0500 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-
51633) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Circle K Stores Inc.; PacWest Energy, LLC dba Jacksons Carwash; Quickie Car Wash
3 LLC dba Super Shine Car Wash; SSCW Arizona, LLC dba Super Star Car Wash;
Thunder Shine, LLC; and US Metro Center Phoenix, LLC dba Ultra Suds Car Wash to
provide vehicle wash services for the Aviation, Police, and Public Works departments.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $1,125,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide vehicle wash services, including all labor, cleaning
supplies, materials, and equipment necessary to wash City cars, trucks, cargo and
passenger vans, and Police Department mobile command and specialty vehicles.
Services include automated and hand wash services.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative
Regulation 3.10.

Seven vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required services. Following an evaluation based on price,
the Procurement Officer recommends awards to the following vendors:

Selected Bidders
· Circle K Stores Inc.
· PacWest Energy, LLC dba Jacksons Carwash
· Quickie Car Wash 3 LLC dba Super Shine Car Wash
· SSCW Arizona, LLC dba Super Star Car Wash
· Thunder Shine, LLC
· US Metro Center Phoenix, LLC dba Ultra Suds Car Wash





Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about February 17, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $1,125,000. Funding is available
in various departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays, Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua and the Aviation, Police, and Public Works departments.








Report

Authorization to Accept 108.7 Acres of Vacant Land by Special Warranty Deed
from RJT Homes - Carver Mountain LLC and to Designate as Mountain Preserve
(Ordinance S-51618) - District 8

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to accept approximately
108.7 acres of vacant undeveloped land located north of W. Carver Road, between
43rd and 51st avenues, by special warranty deed from RJT Homes - Carver Mountain
LLC, its successors, and assigns, and to designate as "Mountain Preserve" in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter XXVI of the City Charter.

Summary
In 2012, the Parks and Recreation Board approved to accept a land donation on the
north side of Carver Road between 43rd and 51st avenues, as part of a rezoning
stipulation granted to Carver Mountain Vistas, LLC to provide a natural space for a
desert park or mountain preserve land for future trailhead and user amenities.
Subsequently, the development suffered setbacks and was ultimately not constructed.
In 2022, the current owner, RJT Homes - Carver Mountain LLC (RJT), re-initiated the
development process of the project including the stipulation to donate the land. The
Parks and Recreation Department provided an update to the Parks and Recreation
Board on November 16, 2023. A condition of the acceptance is for RJT to construct
and build edge protection fencing parallel to Carver Road. The property will be
conveyed by a special warranty deed at no cost to the City with RJT responsible for
expenses related to the donation.

The real property to be accepted is approximately 108.7 acres of vacant land identified
by Maricopa County Assessor parcel numbers 300-08-011A, 300-08-012K, 300-11-
817, 300-11-818, and 300-11-821.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Parks and Recreation Board approved to accept the land donation on December
13, 2012.

Location
North side of W. Carver Road, between the alignment of S. 49th and 45th avenues, if
extended, and east of W. Elliot Road, if extended.



Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation and Finance departments.








Report

Agreement with Brooksee, Inc. to Host 2025 Phoenix Marathon - (Districts 1, 3, 6
& 8)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Brooksee, Inc. (Brooksee) to produce the Phoenix Marathon in December 2025.
There is no financial impact as a result of this request.

Summary
Brooksee, an event producer of marathons and other running races across the
country, has been producing race events in the greater Phoenix market since 2022.
Brooksee is planning the 2025 Phoenix Marathon with support from Visit Phoenix and
the Phoenix Sports & Events Commission. The events are scheduled to take place in
Phoenix in December 2025. Brooksee will produce a 26.2 mile full marathon, half
marathon and 10K race in the City of Phoenix on December 13, 2025. In addition, a
Health and Wellness Expo will take place on December 12, 2025, at the Phoenix
Convention Center where all race participants will pick up race credentials and visit
exhibitor booths from the running and fitness industry. Phoenix is the largest city in the
nation without a signature full marathon running event and Brooksee intends to grow
the inaugural Phoenix Marathon to an annual event.

The Phoenix Marathon will have USA Track & Field (USATF) certified courses. USATF
is a national governing body for the sports of track and field, cross country running,
road running and race walking. As a USATF certified course, the Phoenix Marathon
can qualify runners for the prestigious Boston and New York City marathons as well as
the upcoming Los Angeles Olympics in 2028. Brooksee is also committed to giving
back to the local community. They have a demonstrated history of donating back to
local non-profit community organizations in the cities where they operate events. The
Phoenix Marathon welcomes athletes of all abilities to their races. All facilities at the
event, including start and finish lines, will be Americans with Disabilities Act accessible.
They will also look to partner with groups such as Team Hoyt and 2Gether We Live to
have athletes of all abilities join in this inaugural event.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is for one-year.




Financial Impact
This first year event is expected to draw more than 5,000 total participants including
4,000 out-of-town visitors consuming at least 600-800 hotel room nights with an
anticipated economic impact of $1.7-$2 million from visitor spending and operations.
All official race hotel room blocks will be coordinated through Visit Phoenix and located
within the City of Phoenix. The event organizer will be responsible for event-related
costs including barricades, Phoenix Police staffing and clean-up along the route so
there is no impact to City budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Parks and Recreation Board approved this item on November 21, 2024, by a vote
of 5-0.

Location
Race courses for the full marathon, half marathon and 10K will traverse through
various parts of Phoenix including Districts 1, 3 and 6. The full marathon will start at
Deer Valley Towne Center and finish in the area near Papago Park. The proposed race
course will utilize city streets and a significant portion of the course will utilize existing
trails along the Arizona Canal. In association with the races, a Health and Wellness
Expo will take place at the Phoenix Convention Center South Building in District 8.
Council Districts: 1, 3, 6 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.








Report

Donation from Desertscape Retirement Community to Support the Phoenix Fire
Department’s Paramedic Training Program (Ordinance S-51629) - Citywide

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to accept a donation
valued at approximately $1,119 from Desertscape Retirement Community to support
the Phoenix Fire Department’s Paramedic Training Program. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this donation.

Summary
The Desertscape Retirement Community wishes to express their appreciation for the
Phoenix Fire Department's service by donating $1,119 to the Department. The
donation will be used to fund training, equipment, and/or conferences related to
paramedic certification.

This request adheres to the Fire Department's charitable donations process.

Financial Impact
This donation does not require any matching funds. The funds will be used in
accordance with City policies.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.








Report

General Police Towing Services - RFP 13-006 (Ordinance S-51631) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under the following four contracts for the purchase of general police
towing services for the Police Department: Contact 135124 with Western Towing of
Phoenix, Inc.; Contract 135125 with DVT Enterprises, LLC dba DV Towing; and
Contracts 135126 and 135191 with ACT Towing, dba All City Towing. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $300,000.

Summary
The Police Department requires general towing services to remove vehicles for
citizens involved in vehicle crashes, towing abandoned vehicles, vehicles left in
roadways, illegally parked vehicles and other law enforcement impounds. Towing
services are essential to the Police Department and are mandated by Arizona Revised
Statutes, Phoenix City Codes and Police Department policies. These contracts also
provide auctioneering services of lawfully impounded vehicles that have been
determined to be abandoned vehicles as defined by the Arizona Department of
Transportation Motor Vehicle Division. The additional funds will allow for uninterrupted
service through the end of the contract term.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on December 31, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $300,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $1,629,832. Funds are available in the Police Department's
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· General Police Towing Services - Contracts 135124, 135125, 135126 and 135191
(Ordinance S-39460) on December 19, 2012;
· General Police Towing Services - Contracts 135124, 135125, 135126 and 135191



(Ordinance S-44209) on January 24, 2018;
· General Police Towing Services - Contracts 135124, 135125, 135126 and 135191
(Ordinance S-44333) on March 21, 2018;
· General Police Towing Services - Contracts 135124, 135125, 135126 and 135191
(Ordinance S-45345) on February 6, 2019;
· General Police Towing Services - Contracts 135124, 135125, 135126 and 135191
(Ordinance S-45759) on June 5, 2019;
· General Police Towing Services - Contracts 135124, 135125, 135126 and 135191
(Ordinance S-47246) on January 20, 2021; and
· General Police Towing Services - Contracts 135124, 135125, 135126 and 135191
(Ordinance S-50583) on February 21, 2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

FLIR Equipment, Parts and Services - Requirements Contract - RFA 19-011 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-51632) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 152013 with Teledyne FLIR Surveillance, Inc. to extend the contract term.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. No additional funds are needed, request to continue using Ordinance S-46426.

Summary
This contract provides the Star SAFIRE 380-HD U-8000 System, Single LRU EO/IR
Imaging System, U-800 with parts, accessories, warranties, labor and repairs for the
Phoenix Police Department Air Support Unit Astar Helicopter and PC12 Pilatus
Airplane. This equipment assists pilots in detecting warm objects against cooler
backgrounds when searching for suspects involved in criminal activity during poor or
obstructed visibility. This two-year extension allows for the contract to be aligned with
the warranty for the equipment which expires in 2027.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the term of the contract will be extended through February 28, 2027.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $1,740,000, and no additional
funds are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· FLIR Equipment, Parts and Services - Requirements Contract 152013 (Ordinance S
-46426) on March 18, 2020;
· FLIR Equipment, Parts and Services - Requirements Contract 152013 (Ordinance S
-47595) on June 2, 2021; and
· FLIR Equipment, Parts and Services - Requirements Contract 152013 (Ordinance S
-48183) on December 15, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.




Report

Amend Phoenix City Code Section 4-114 (Ordinance G-7358) - Citywide

Request authorization to amend Phoenix City Code section 4-114 (Fueling and
defueling aircraft; fueling ground service equipment; flowage fee) to authorize the City
Manager, or his designee, to issue a fuel dispenser permit to Aircraft Storage
Operators operating under a Specialized Aviation Service Operator permit.

Summary
Phoenix City Code section 4-149 authorizes the Aviation Director "to establish and
enforce minimum standards for persons seeking to provide aeronautical services or to
engage in aeronautical activities at an airport." The Aviation Department has
established minimum standard regulations for persons seeking to provide aeronautical
services known as Specialized Aviation Service Operators (SASOs). Aircraft Storage
Operators are one of the SASOs. The minimum standard regulation for Aircraft
Storage Operators was amended to authorize Aircraft Storage Operators to dispense
fuel in accordance with the limitations and requirements in the regulation.

Phoenix City Code section 4-114 authorizes the Aviation Director to issue a fuel
dispenser permit to certain operators to dispense fuel at the airport. The fuel dispenser
permit includes important operational and safety requirements. This amendment will
add Aircraft Storage Operators operating under a SASO permit as an operator to
whom the Aviation Director may issue a fuel dispenser permit.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Phoenix and the Arizona Early
Childhood Development and Health Board to Administer the Airport Worker
Childcare Scholarship Program (Ordinance S-51635) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend the
Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Phoenix Aviation Department and
the Arizona Early Childhood Development and Health Board (known as First Things
First) to administer the Airport Worker Childcare Scholarship Program. Funding is
available through the City's allocation of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, as
part of the Aviation childcare program of the City's ARPA strategic plan.

Summary
The Aviation Department is requesting to extend its Intergovernmental Agreement with
First Things First to administer the Airport Worker Childcare Scholarship Program
(Program). The Program was created as part of the City's ARPA strategic plan to
support essential workers who are key to the safe and efficient operation of Phoenix
Sky Harbor International Airport. The Program is administered by First Things First
through a partnership with Valley of the Sun United Way, using the established
framework of the First Things First Quality First scholarship program and childcare star
rating system. The Program provides scholarships to households making 400 percent
or less of the federal poverty level. As part of administering the Program, First Things
First verifies household income eligibility for the Program, distributes funds to eligible
families, and reports on Program participation.

Contract Term
If approved, the Intergovernmental Agreement will be extended to December 31, 2025,
with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
No additional funds are being requested.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
scholarship program, on September 21, 2021.



6, 2022.

Location
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Facilities and Services Tonto Lot
Campus Phase I - Professional Services - AV16000037 (Ordinance S-51625) -
District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc. to provide Professional Services for
architectural and engineering program validation, design, and possible construction
administration and inspection services for the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
Facilities and Services Tonto Lot Campus Phase I project. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $1.9 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include:
electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable television, railroads,
and other modes of transportation. Further request the City Council to grant an
exception to Phoenix City Code Section 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents
pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions
that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code Section 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to develop a campus for the Facilities and Services
Division as identified by the Comprehensive Asset Management Plan at Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport. This multi-building campus is proposed as a phased
development. The first phase includes a facility to accommodate both permanent and
temporary functions as well as master plan the overall campus site.

M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc.'s services include: general project
administration, schematic design/pre-design phase (30 percent), design development
phase (60 percent, 90 percent, and 100 percent), commissioning, cost analysis,
construction documents and specifications, and possible construction administration



and inspection.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Four firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: SmithGroup, Inc.
Rank 3: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Rank 4: Architekton, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc. will not exceed $1.9
million, including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
end of the term of the agreement.

Location
2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Inger Erickson,
the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.





Report

Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 3 North Concourse 2
Processor Improvements - Professional Services - AV13000004 (Ordinance S-
51627) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc. to provide Professional Services for
architectural and engineering program validation, design, and possible construction
administration and inspection services for the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
Terminal 3 North Concourse 2 Processor Improvements project. Further request to
authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to the agreement
as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services
will not exceed $2 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include:
electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable television, railroads,
and other modes of transportation. Further request the City Council to grant an
exception to Phoenix City Code Section 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents
pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions
that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code Section 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to improve the Terminal Processor and Baggage
Handling System at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 3. This project
consists of modifications to the passenger check-in process and improvements to
baggage handling system operations.

M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc.'s services include: general project
administration, schematic design/pre-design (30 percent), design development phase
(60 percent, 90 percent, and 100 percent), commissioning, cost analysis, construction
documents and specifications, and possible construction administration and



inspection.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Five firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Corgan Associates, Inc.
Rank 3: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Rank 4: Architekton, Inc. + Grimshaw
Rank 5: Introba, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, Inc. will not exceed $2
million, including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past
termination of the agreement.

Location
2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Inger Erickson,
the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.




Report

Miscellaneous Building Repairs - Amendment (Ordinance S-51626) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 157102 with BWC Enterprises, Inc. dba Woodruff Construction for additional
funding to provide miscellaneous building repairs. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures
included in the amendment will not exceed $1,750,000.

Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to request additional payment authority due to the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) related General Obligation Bond (GO Bond)
requirements to provide miscellaneous building repairs at multiple City properties
including Fire, Police, Library, Human Services, Neighborhood Services, Public Works,
and the Parks and Recreation departments.

The Contractor is responsible for general building maintenance and repairs at City
properties such as plumbing, painting, general rough and finished carpentry, small
flooring repairs, slot drain cleaning, minor asphalt work, minor concrete repairs,
exterior wall texturing, drywall repair, tape and texture, acoustical ceiling work, and
caulking services.

Contract Term
The contract expiration date is September 30, 2025 and has no option years
remaining.

Financial Impact
The initial authorization for the contract was for an amount not-to-exceed $1,350,000.
The additional funds approved by previous City Council action increased the not-to-
exceed amount to $1,600,000. This amendment will increase the authorization for the
contract by an additional $1,750,000, for a new amount not-to-exceed $3,350,000.
Funding for this amendment is available in the Public Works Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously approved Miscellaneous Building Repairs Contract 157102



(Ordinance S-48966) on September 21, 2022. The City Council approved additional
funding (Ordinance S-51061) on June 26, 2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Works
Department.








Report

Apply for U.S. Department of Transportation Better Utilizing Investments to
Leverage Development Grant Opportunity for Federal Fiscal Year 2024-25 -
Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Funding (Ordinance S-51621) - District 2

Request to retroactively authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for,
accept, and if awarded, enter into an agreement for disbursement of Federal funding
from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) through the Federal Fiscal Year
(FFY) 2024-25 Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) grant
opportunity. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City
Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. Funding for this grant opportunity
is available through the Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The total grant funds
applied for will not exceed $25 million. The City’s local match would not exceed $11
million. Additionally request, if awarded, to enter into separate agreements with
Arizona State University and Mayo Clinic regarding their financial commitments.

Summary
The Street Transportation Department is submitting a capital construction application
grant to advance the detailed design of a new 1.2-mile multi-lane roadway on 64th
Street from Bell Road to Mayo Boulevard. It would also provide the funding to
construct the new roadway, including a new roadway bridge across the Central Arizona
Project (CAP) Canal that would connect Phoenix residents south of the canal to a
growing educational, medical, and commercial area north of the canal to Mayo
Boulevard. In addition to the new roadway connection, the project would include multi-
modal amenities, including bike lanes and pedestrian facilities, streetlights, traffic
signals, and drainage improvements. The project will include a public-private
partnership with both Arizona State University and Mayo Clinic with a combined
financial commitment of approximately $4 million.

USDOT issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for the FFY 2024-25
Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant
program on November 1, 2024 and an amended NOFO on January 24, 2025, re-
naming the program from RAISE to BUILD. The deadline for application submittal is
January 30, 2025. BUILD grants are awarded on a competitive basis considering these
evaluative criteria:




· Safety.
· Environmental sustainability.
· Quality of life.
· Mobility and community connectivity.
· Economic competitiveness and opportunity.
· State of good repair.
· Partnership and collaboration.
· Innovation.

The FFY 2024-25 BUILD planning grant specifies no minimum award amount for
urban projects and no greater than $25 million.

Financial Impact
The estimated total cost for the project is approximately $40 million. The maximum
federal participation rate is 80 percent, with a minimum local match of 20 percent of
the total eligible project cost. If awarded, the Federal match would not exceed $25
million (62.5 percent), and the City’s cost would be approximately $11 million (27.5
percent) for the local match. A separate public-private partnership agreement with
Arizona State University and Mayo Clinic would be required for their participation of
approximately $4 million combined (10 percent) toward the capital construction grant.

Funding for the local match is available in the Street Transportation Department's
budget. Potential grant funding received is available through the Federal Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law, from USDOT through the FFY 2024-25 BUILD grant opportunity.

Location
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Inger Erickson and Mario Paniagua,
and the Street Transportation Department.








Report

Apply for U.S. Department of Transportation Better Utilizing Investments to
Leverage Development Grant Opportunity for Federal Fiscal Year 2024-25 -
Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Funding (Ordinance S-51634) - Districts 7
&8

Request to retroactively authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for,
accept and, if awarded, enter into an agreement for disbursement of Federal funding
from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) through the Federal Fiscal Year
(FFY) 2024-25 Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) grant
opportunity. If awarded, the funding will be used to evaluate and update the design of
the Laveen Area Conveyance Channel. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer
to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. Funding for
this grant opportunity is available through the Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
The total grant funds applied for will not exceed $1.75 million, and the City’s local
match would not exceed $350,000.

Summary
The Parks and Recreation and Street Transportation departments are collaborating on
a planning grant submittal for the Laveen Area Conveyance Channel. The purpose of
the planning grant is to evaluate and update the design of a dual-purpose amenity
channel that extends 5.8 miles in the Laveen Village of Phoenix, serving to capture
and convey local regional drainage while also serving the community as an active
transportation corridor. The goal of the planning grant will be to evaluate and make
recommendations that would best serve the existing transportation amenity, including
but not limited to improvements to the existing channel design, and to design a 10-foot
multi-use path on the north side, including landscaping, updated irrigation, turf
improvements, exercise equipment, improved drainage system equipment, a booster
pump and well, path lighting and other transportation or green infrastructure
appropriate for the surrounding corridor. This planning project will meet the grant
criteria for competitiveness.

USDOT issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for the FFY 2024-25
Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant
program on November 1, 2024 and an amended NOFO on January 24, 2025, re-
naming the program from RAISE to BUILD. The deadline for application submittal was



January 30, 2025. BUILD grants are awarded on a competitive basis considering these
evaluative criteria:

· Safety
· Environmental sustainability
· Quality of life
· Mobility and community connectivity
· Economic competitiveness and opportunity
· State of good repair
· Partnership and collaboration
· Innovation

The FFY 2024-25 BUILD planning grant specifies no minimum award amount for
urban projects and no greater than $25 million.

Financial Impact
The estimated total cost for the project is approximately $1.75 million. The maximum
Federal participation rate is 80 percent, with a minimum local match of 20 percent of
the total eligible project cost. If awarded, the Federal match would not exceed $1.4
million (80 percent) and the City’s cost would be approximately $350,000 (20 percent)
for the local match.

Funding for the local match is available in the Parks and Recreation Department’s
Capital Improvement Program budget. Potential grant funding received is available
through the Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, from USDOT through the FFY 2024-
25 BUILD grant opportunity.

Location
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers John Chan, Inger Erickson and Mario
Paniagua, and the Street Transportation and Parks and Recreation departments.








Report

Annual Membership Agreement with Arizona State University’s Southwest
Pavement Technology Consortium (Ordinance S-51630) - Citywide

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
agreement for an annual membership with Arizona State University’s (ASU) Southwest
Pavement Technology Consortium. Further request an exemption from the
indemnification prohibition set forth in the Phoenix City Code Section 42-18 for a
governmental entity pursuant to Phoenix City Code Section 42-20.

Summary
The Street Transportation Department (Streets) requests annual membership with
ASU's Southwest Pavement Technology Consortium. The consortium is an alliance
between academic, agency, and industry members, whereby the parties strategically
advance fundamental research activities and training in pavement science and
engineering.

Roads are among the most critical assets of the City of Phoenix. Streets is responsible
for maintaining over 4,800 street miles with an annual consumption of over 500,000
tons of asphalt material, with an equivalent market value of approximately $100 million.
Lack of consistent funding and increasing construction costs have been a challenge for
many state and local agencies, including the City. Phoenix's street infrastructure is also
challenged by the changing climate, with extreme heat and intensifying flooding
events.

Membership with the consortium will allow Streets to partner with ASU and take part in
innovative and advanced technologies, primarily focused on areas of pavement
materials (asphalt and concrete mixes, base, and subgrade components),
construction, preservation and rehabilitation, design, sustainable practices, and life-
cycle management. By participating in the consortium, the City will be able to access
cutting-edge research and solutions tailored to its transportation needs, potentially
saving millions of dollars on pavement projects by staying current with modern
practices. In addition, the consortium offers a unique opportunity to support
sustainability efforts, particularly in mitigating heat through effective pavement
solutions, while maintaining resilient infrastructure. The partnership also aids workforce
development by connecting the City with well-trained students and providing high-



quality training for inspectors and contractors. Finally, joining the consortium enhances
the City’s legacy by partnering with a globally recognized university, fostering public
trust, and contributing to the nation’s only pavement consortium, which bridges
academia, industry, and government agencies.

Contract Term
This request is for a one-year membership with ASU’s Southwest Pavement
Technology Consortium.

Financial Impact
The annual membership fee is $50,000 for ASU’s Southwest Pavement Technology
Consortium. Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Street
Transportation Department.








Report

5ED Water Pressure Zone Resilience - Engineering Services - WS85050056
(Ordinance S-51623) - District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Carollo Engineers, Inc. to provide Engineering Services that include study, design,
and possible construction administration and inspection services for the 5ED Water
Pressure Zone Resilience project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The fee for all services will not exceed $4 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to study the 5ED and surrounding pressure zones to
recommend future projects to add resilience to the 5ED zone. The project will also
include design of the proposed improvements.

Carollo Engineers, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to: Study services
include: demand analysis, hydraulic modeling, storage analysis, water quality modeling
and operational modeling to consider extreme drought conditions with no Central
Arizona Project water available. Design services include: provide construction
documents and specifications for the construction of the selected alternative, provide a
construction schedule and opinion of probable cost to construct and complete the
selected alternative, develop preliminary Maintenance of Plant Operations plans for
pipeline or facility shutdown/recharge, coordinate with the Street Transportation and



other City departments as required on right-of-way and/or City owned property, identify
all utility locations both vertically and horizontally in conflict with the project, conduct
geotechnical evaluations to develop construction requirements, and obtain all
applicable permits. Possible construction administration and inspection services
include: general project administration, construction inspections, resident engineering
services during construction, daily interaction with contractors to clarify job
requirements, administration of contractor's contract, decision making regarding
technical project issues, monitoring of job progress, review and certification of
progress payments and job orders, preparation of record drawings, and public
information and public relations services.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Five firms submitted proposals
and are listed below:

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Wilson Engineers, LLC
Rank 3: Black & Veatch Corporation
Rank 4: Entellus, Inc.
Rank 5: Coe and Van Loo L.L.C.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Carollo Engineers, Inc. will not exceed $4 million, including all
subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the


agreement termination.

Location
General Location: Area bounded by Central Arizona Project Canal to the south,
Carefree Highway to the north, I-17 to the west, and Cave Creek Road to the east.
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Inger Erickson,
the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Water Production Wells and Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells Phase II -
Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services Amendment - WS85010054,
WS85010052 and WS85010045 (Ordinance S-51617) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 151455 with Felix Construction Company to provide additional
Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services for the Water Production Wells
and Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells Phase II project. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional fee for services included in this amendment
will not exceed $17,360,000.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to augment Phoenix's potable water resources during
times of long-term water shortages, emergency outages, and meeting potable system
demand balancing.

This amendment is necessary because of increased scope of work to meet agency
requirements and higher than anticipated budgeted cost due to the escalation in
materials and labor cost for the project. This amendment will provide additional funds
and time to the agreement.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment is five years from the issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
· The initial agreement for Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services was
approved for an amount not to exceed $225,000, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.
· An amendment increased the agreement by $3,150,000, for a new total amount not
to exceed $3,375,000.


· This amendment will increase the agreement by an additional $17,360,000 for a
new total amount not to exceed $20,735,000, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.

Funding for this amendment is available in the Water Services Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately
review and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services Agreement 151454 and
Construction Services Agreement 151455 (Ordinance S-46273) on January 8,
2020; and
· Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services Agreement 151455
Amendment (Ordinance S-46428) on March 18, 2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Inger Erickson,
the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Scenario 9 Transmission Main Rehabilitation - Engineering Services -
WS85507006 (Ordinance S-51619) - Districts 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Wilson Engineers, LLC to provide Engineering Services that include assessment,
design, and possible construction administration and inspection services for the
Scenario 9 Transmission Main Rehabilitation project. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $1,500,000.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to rehabilitate steel slip-line of 2,700 linear feet of the 48-
inch diameter Pre-stressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe Transmission Main Scenario 9.

Wilson Engineers, LLC's services include, but are not limited to: Design Services:
provide steel slip lining rehabilitation recommendations and complete steel slip lining
rehabilitation design for Scenario 9, provide construction documents and specifications
for the rehabilitation design, provide a construction schedule and engineer's estimate
of cost to construct and complete the main rehabilitation, develop preliminary
Maintenance of Plant Operations plans for pipeline shutdown and recharge, coordinate
with the Street Transportation and other City departments as required on right-of-way
and/or City owned property, identify all utility locations both vertically and horizontally
in conflict with proposed access pits, coordinate with the City's potholing contractor as



necessary to establish utility locations, coordinate with other design consultants on
adjacent projects, as needed, conduct geotechnical evaluations to develop
construction requirements, investigate and identify traffic control impacts and costs
using the City's Right-of-Way Management Program, and obtain all applicable permits.
Construction Administration and Inspection Services: general project administration
and construction inspections, resident engineering services during construction, daily
interaction with contractors to clarify job requirements, administration of contractor's
contract, decision making regarding technical project issues, monitoring of job
progress, review and certification of progress payments and job orders, and
preparation of record drawings.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. One firm submitted a proposal
and is listed below:

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Wilson Engineers, LLC

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Wilson Engineers, LLC will not exceed $1,500,000, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
Roeser Road from 4th Street to 9th Street
Council Districts: 7 and 8



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Inger Erickson,
the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Scenario 9 Transmission Main Rehabilitation - Construction Manager at Risk
Services - WS85507006 (Ordinance S-51620) - Districts 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Achen-Gardner Construction, L.L.C. to provide Construction Manager at Risk
Preconstruction and Construction Services for the Scenario 9 Transmission Main
Rehabilitation project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The fee for services will not exceed $9,620,000.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to rehabilitate steel slip-line of 2,700 linear feet of the 48-
inch diameter Pre-stressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe Transmission Main Scenario 9.

Achen-Gardner Construction, L.L.C. will begin in an agency support role for
Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services. Achen-Gardner Construction,
L.L.C. will assume the risk of delivering the project through a Guaranteed Maximum
Price agreement.

Achen-Gardner Construction, L.L.C.’s Preconstruction Services include, but are not
limited to: provide detailed cost estimating and knowledge of marketplace conditions,
provide project planning and planning and scheduling, provide for construction phasing
and scheduling that will minimize interruption to City operations, provide alternate
systems evaluation and constructability studies, advise City on ways to gain
efficiencies in project delivery, provide long-lead procurement studies and initiate
procurement of long-lead items, assist in the permitting processes, and participating
with the City in a process to establish a Small Business Enterprise (SBE) goal for the
project.

Achen-Gardner Construction, L.L.C.'s initial Construction Services will include
preparation of a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal provided under the agreement.
Achen-Gardner Construction, L.L.C. will be responsible for construction means and
methods related to the project and fulfilling the SBE program requirements. Achen-
Gardner Construction, L.L.C. will be required to solicit bids from prequalified



subcontractors and to perform the work using the City’s subcontractor selection
process. Achen-Gardner Construction, L.L.C. may also compete to self-perform limited
amounts of work.

Achen-Gardner Construction, L.L.C.’s additional Construction Services include
construction per final plans and specifications, select subcontractors and suppliers for
this project, prepare a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that meets the approval of
the City, coordinate with various City of Phoenix departments, other agencies, and
utility companies, arrange for procurement of materials and equipment, schedule and
manage site operations, bid, award, and manage all construction related contracts
while meeting City bid requirements including the local and SBE participation goal,
provide quality controls, bond and insure the construction, address all federal, state
and local permitting requirements and deal with City issues.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Three firms submitted proposals
and are listed below:

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Achen-Gardner Construction, L.L.C.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Kiewit Infrastructure West Co.
Rank 3: Garney Companies, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Work
scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may
be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Achen-Gardner Construction, L.L.C. will not exceed
$9,620,000, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up


to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
Roeser Road from 4th Street to 9th Street
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Inger Erickson,
the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Solar Services Agreement - Amendment (Ordinance S-51622) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Agreement 132993 with Solar Star Arizona III, LLC for the delivery
of electrical energy for the Water Services Department. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $7,000,000.

Summary
This agreement will provide the delivery of electrical energy generated by the solar
system located at the Lake Pleasant Water Treatment Plant. The 7.5 megawatt solar
facility produces approximately 75 percent of the Plant's power needs. The
amendment allows for additional expenditures to procure the energy to necessary for
the continuation of the Plant operations.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on January 31, 2032.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $7,000,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $20,000,000. Funds are available in the Water Services
Department’s Operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-38171) on February 1, 2012;
Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-39879) on June 5, 2013;
Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-40931) on June 4, 2014;
Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-41780) on June 3, 2015;
Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-42566) on June 1, 2016;
Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-43770) on June 28, 2017;
Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-44629) on June 6, 2018;
Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-45845) on June 26, 2019;
Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-46647) on June 3, 2020;
Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-47658) on June 16, 2021; and



Solar Services Agreement 132993 (Ordinance S-49701) on May 31, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Request to Amend an Intergovernmental Agreement with City of Glendale to
Provide Treated Water (Ordinance S-51628) - District 5

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to amend an existing
Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Glendale (referred to herein as the
"Glendale"), to allow Glendale to continue providing treated water to the Camelback
Ranch service area within the City, through an established inter-connect location.
Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to
disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
(Agreement Number 123273) with Glendale on March 31, 2008 to establish a water-
delivery location allowing Glendale to provide treated water to Phoenix, to serve the
spring training sports complex facility near Phoenix’s Camelback Ranch area.

The IGA initial contract term was 10 years with an additional five-years of renewal
option that automatically renewed and expired on March 30, 2023. The IGA also had a
clause stating that “the agreement will remain in effect so long as treated water is
necessary for customers located within the (Sports Facility Development) area, unless
Phoenix or Glendale, or both, decide to terminate the agreement."

This request is to reinstate and extend the original contract term for an additional 20
years through an IGA amendment, starting from the effective date of the amendment.
All other original agreement terms remain the same.

Under this IGA, Glendale will provide treated water through an established “Point of
Delivery” to Phoenix, utilizing Phoenix’s Salt River Project's (SRP) water allocation.
Phoenix will provide retail water services to the customers in the Camelback Ranch
service area and collect the City’s standard retail water services fees. Phoenix will pay
Glendale for the delivered treated water at Glendale’s commercial retail customer rate,
based on the metered amount at the Point of Delivery minus two percent as a credit for
Phoenix supplying SRP's water. If Glendale establishes a wholesale water delivery
rate, the treated water delivered to Phoenix may be charged at Glendale’s wholesale
rate as long as the wholesale rate is less than Glendale’s commercial retail customer



rate.

Contract Term
The contract term will be for 20 years starting from the effective date of the IGA
amendment.

Financial Impact
There is no additional financial impact to the City. The City is currently paying Glendale
for the treated water in the Camelback Ranch area and recovers the cost through
collecting retail water services fees from the customers in this area.

Location
Camelback Ranch service area
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1275 (Ordinance G-7351)
- District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1275. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with a portion of Z-87-03-2 and the entitlements are fully
vested.

Summary
To rezone the southwest corners of 66th Street and Mayo Boulevard, and 68th Street
and Princess Drive.
Application No.: Z-87-03-2
Zoning: R-3A PCD
Owner: Paradise Ridge HOA, Cachet-Monterey Ridge, LLC, et al
Acreage: 81.83

Location
Southwest corners of 66th Street and Mayo Boulevard, and 68th Street and Princess
Drive
Address: 18420 and 18424 N. 66th Street; 17850 N. 68th Street; 6585 and 6755 E.
Mayo Boulevard; and various others.
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1275.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1275, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of February,

2025.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By: _________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




DI: arm: LF24-2915:2-5-2025







Report

Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1276 (Ordinance G-7352)
- District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1276. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with Z-87-A-03-2 and the entitlements are fully vested.

Summary
To rezone an area located approximately 243 feet west of the northwest corner of
Scottsdale Road and Princess Drive.
Application No.: Z-87-A-03-2
Zoning: C-2 SP PCD
Owner: United Auto Scottsdale P H, LLC LS 03-109548 c/o UAG Realty, LLC and the
Arizona State Land Department
Acreage: 3.79

Location
Approximately 243 feet west of the northwest corner of Scottsdale Road and Princess
Drive
Address: 7150 E. Princess Drive
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1276.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1276, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of February,

2025.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By: _________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




DI: arm: LF24-2920:2-5-2025







Report

Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1277 (Ordinance G-7353)
- District 6

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1277. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with Z-86-06 and the entitlements are fully vested.

Summary
To rezone a parcel on the northeast corner of 24th Street and Camelback Road.
Application No.: Z-86-06-6
Zoning: C-2 H-R
Owner: Biltmore Shopping Center Partners, et al.
Acreage: 27.33

Location
Northeast corner of 24th Street and Camelback Road
Address: 5025 N. 24th Street; and 2402, 2410, 2442, 2446, 2450, 2462, 2470, 2502,
2580, 2590 and 2608 E. Camelback Road
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1277.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1277, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of February,

2025.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:_________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




DI:arm:LF24-2950:02-05-2025







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-117-24-1 -
Northeast Corner of 17th Avenue and Happy Valley Road (Ordinance G-7354) -
District 1

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (Intermediate
Commercial, Height Waiver, Density Waiver) to allow multifamily residential with a
height and density waiver.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1
Proposed Zoning: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR
Acreage: 13.17
Proposal: Multifamily residential with a height and density waiver

Owner: Robert Kater, Katman, LLC, et al.
Applicant: Dennis Newcombe, Gammage & Burnham, PLC
Representative: Ashley Z. Marsh, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard this item on December
17, 2024, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 10-
1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on January 2, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Northeast corner of 17th Avenue and Happy Valley Road
Council District: 1
Parcel Address: 25051 N. 17th Avenue and 1600 W. Happy Valley Road






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-117-24-1) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE) TO C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL, HEIGHT WAIVER, DENSITY WAIVER).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 13.17-acre site located at the northeast

corner of 17th Avenue and Happy Valley Road in a portion of Section 6, Township 4

North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed

from “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence) to “C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR” (Intermediate

Commercial, Height Waiver, Density Waiver).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped
September 24, 2024, as modified by the following stipulations and approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

2. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped September 3, 2024, as modified by the following stipulations and
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The R-5 Planned Residential Development Option shall be used for the
development.

4. The site shall be limited to a maximum of 400 units.

5. The landscape setback along 17th Avenue shall be planted with minimum 2-inch
caliper, large canopy, drought-tolerant trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in
equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

6. Trees located within the landscape area along Happy Valley Road, outside the
utility easement area, shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy,
drought-tolerant trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. The applicant shall utilize the Sonoran Boulevard Development Standards for
Happy Valley Road for development both within and adjacent to the right-of-way
for Happy Valley Road, except that sidewalks shall not meander as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

8. All bicycle infrastructure shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

9. A 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated along Happy
Valley Road and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be
constructed within the easement, in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail
and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

10. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.




11. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prior to City Council
action and receive final acknowledgement of receipt prior to preliminary site plan
approval. The developer shall comply with their determined proportionate share of
street improvements or stipulations pursuant to the final TIA, as agreed to by the
Street Transportation Department.

12. An updated Traffic Impact Analysis shall be required for proposals of commercial
development, as required by the Street Transportation Department.

13. A minimum 70 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
north half of Happy Valley Road. Right-of-way construction shall include a 24-foot
wide median, as approved by the Street Transportation Department

14. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 10-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed on the north side of Happy Valley Road,
adjacent to the development. The landscape area shall be planted to achieve a
minimum of 75% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

15. A total of 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the east half of 17th
Avenue, or as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 8-foot-wide
landscape area shall be constructed on the east side of 17th Avenue, adjacent to
the development, or as otherwise approved by the Planning and Development
Department. The landscape area shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper,
single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant trees planted 20 feet on center, or in
equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers with a
maximum mature height of two feet to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

17. A minimum of two pedestrian connections shall be provided on the southern site
boundary to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent Happy Valley Road
multi-use trail. Each pedestrian connection shall include an 8-foot-wide shaded
pedestrian pathway consisting of decorative material such as brick, pavers or an
alternative material, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

18. All existing electrical utilities 12 kv and smaller within the public right-of-way shall




be undergrounded, adjacent to the development. The developer shall coordinate
with the affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

19. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

20. Bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.25 spaces per unit, up to
a maximum of 50 spaces shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic
racks and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, or through secure parking storage area/s, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of
Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master
Plan.

21. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

22. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided on the site. The station
shall include but not be limited to: standard repair tools affixed to the station; a tire
gauge and pump; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to
spin freely while making adjustments to the bike, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

23. A minimum of 5% of the required parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
(EV) Installed Infrastructure, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

24. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

25. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin, and
only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf areas,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

26. A leak detection device shall be installed for the irrigation system in
landscape/open space areas larger than 10,000 square feet.

27. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to minimize
maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite landscape
irrigation.




28. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

29. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

30. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
Program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

31. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater
management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This includes but is not
limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales, permeable pavement, etc.,
per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development
Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

32. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the
templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by
the City Attorney.

33. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

34. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.




PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of February,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-117-24-1

15TH AVENUE AND HAPPY VALLEY ROAD

THE GENERAL BOUNDARIES OF THIS AREA INCLUDE APN 210-10-028C
LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 15TH AVE AND HAPPY VALLEY ROAD AND ALL OF
THE AREA ENCOMPASSED BY THE LINES DESCRIBED HEREIN BEING WITHIN
THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA.

THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH,
RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, EXCEPT THE SOUTH 40, FEET, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER (CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAP IN
HANDHOLD) OF SAID SECTION 6, FORM WHICH THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER
(MARICOPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRASS CAP FLUSH)
OF SAID SECTION 6 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 07 SECONDS
EAST A DISTANCE OF 2647.18 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6 A DISTANCE OF
1948.76 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF;

THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 40.00 FEET OF SAID WEST HALF, SAID POINT
BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF A DISTANCE OF 620.36 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST HALF A DISTANCE OF 346.70 FEET TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF;

THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF A DISTANCE OF 620.22 FEET TO SAID NORTH
LINE OF THE SOUTH 40.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID
LAST NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 349.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING




17TH AVENUE AND HAPPY VALLEY ROAD

THE GENERAL BOUNDARIES OF THIS AREA INCLUDE APNS 210-10-005 & 210-10-
013B LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 17TH AVE AND HAPPY VALLEY ROAD AND
ALL OF THE AREA ENCOMPASSED BY THE LINES DESCRIBED HEREIN BEING
WITHIN THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA.

THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER ALL OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 3
EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, EXCEPT THE SOUTH 40 FEET, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER (CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAP IN
HANDHOLE) OF SAID SECTION 6, FORM WHICH THE SOUTH QUARTER
(MARICOPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRASS CAP FLUSH)
OF SAID SECTION 6 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 07 SECONDS
EAST A DISTANCE 2647.18 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6 A DISTANCE OF
1250.34 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE NORTH
LINE OF THE SOUTH 40.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTH HALF, SAID POINT BEING THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 290.33 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID SOUTH HALF;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF A DISTANCE OF 347.96 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER;

THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 330.25 FEET TO
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER;




THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 346.78 FEET TO
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER;

THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER AND SAID SOUTH HALF A DISTANCE
OF 620.36 FEET TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 40.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG LAST
SAID SOUTH NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 698.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-129-24-3 -
Approximately 500 Feet North of the Northwest Corner of 25th Avenue and
Dunlap Avenue (Ordinance G-7355) - District 3

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 M-R (Approved C-2 M-R PKG/WVR) (Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise District,
Approved Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise District, Parking Waiver), C-2 M-R
(Approved C-2 M-R SP and C-2 M-R PKG/WVR) (Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise
District, Approved Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise District, Special Permit and
Approved Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise District, Parking Waiver), and C-2 M-R
DNS/WVR (Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise District, Density Waiver) to C-2 M-R
DNS/WVR (Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise District, Density Waiver) for multifamily
residential with a density waiver.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 M-R (Approved C-2 M-R PKG/WVR) (11.76 acres), C-2 M-R
(Approved C-2 M-R SP and C-2 M-R PKG/WVR) (0.56 acres), and C-2 M-R
DNS/WVR (0.14 acres)
Proposed Zoning: C-2 M-R DNS/WVR
Acreage: 12.46
Proposal: Multifamily residential with a density waiver

Owner: Canyon Corporate Partners, LLC a Delaware LLC Attn: Brian Snider
Applicant: Ricardo Toris, Earl & Curley, P.C.
Representative: Taylor C. Earl, Earl & Curley, P.C.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The North Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this item on
December 18, 2024, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a
vote of 16-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on January 2, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the North Mountain Village Planning Committee, by a
vote of 8-0.




Location
Approximately 500 feet north of the northwest corner of 25th Avenue and Dunlap
Avenue
Council District: 3
Parcel Address: 2510 and 2512 W. Dunlap Avenue

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-129-24-3) FROM C-2 M-R (APPROVED C-2 M-
R PKG/WVR) (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, MID-RISE
DISTRICT, APPROVED INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, MID-
RISE DISTRICT, PARKING WAIVER), C-2 M-R (APPROVED C-2
M-R SP AND C-2 M-R PKG/WVR) (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL, MID-RISE DISTRICT, APPROVED
INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, MID-RISE DISTRICT, SPECIAL
PERMIT AND APPROVED INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, MID-
RISE DISTRICT, PARKING WAIVER), AND C-2 M-R DNS/WVR
(INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, MID-RISE DISTRICT, DENSITY
WAIVER) TO C-2 M-R DNS/WVR (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL, MID-RISE DISTRICT, DENSITY WAIVER).
____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 12.46-acre site located approximately 500

feet north of the northwest corner of 25th Avenue and Dunlap Avenue in a portion of

Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A,” is hereby changed from 11.76 acres of “C-2 M-R (Approved C-2 M-R PKG/WVR)”

(Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise District, Approved Intermediate Commercial, Mid-

Rise District, Parking Waiver), 0.56-acres of “C-2 M-R (Approved C-2 M-R SP and C-2




M-R PKG/WVR)” (Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise District, Approved Intermediate

Commercial, Mid-Rise District, Special Permit and Approved Intermediate Commercial,

Mid-Rise District, Parking Waiver), and 0.14-acres of “C-2 M-R DNS/WVR”

(Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise District, Density Waiver) to “C-2 M-R

DNS/WVR”(Intermediate Commercial, Mid-Rise District, Density Waiver).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. All new structures along the Arizona Canal and 25th Avenue, not depicted on
the site plan dated September 16, 2024, shall provide frontages or alternative
frontages per Phoenix Zoning Ordinance Section 1305.B, for a minimum 70%
of each new structure’s frontage oriented toward these areas (the Arizona
Canal and 25th Avenue), as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

2. The ground level exterior of the North Parking Structure, as depicted on the site
plan date stamped September 16, 2024, shall contain architectural
embellishments or detailing that will create visual interest for adjoining
properties and enhance the public right-of-way, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

3. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. The developer shall provide secure bicycle parking per Section 1307 of
the Zoning Ordinance.

b. Guest bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.05
spaces per dwelling unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces required.




c. A minimum of 10 percent of the provided bicycle parking spaces shall
include standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging
capabilities.

d. Bicycle parking spaces shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade.

e. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
on site within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance. The
bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high
visibility and separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where
applicable. The repair station shall include, but not be limited to:

i. Standard repair tools affixed to the station;

ii. A tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the
ground;

iii. A bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin
freely while making adjustments to the bike.

4. A minimum 6-foot-wide pedestrian pathway shall be provided within the site,
connecting to the Arizona Canal at the northwest corner of the site, 25th
Avenue, and the “existing asphalt accessway” (at the south), as depicted on
the site plan date stamped September 16, 2024, containing the following
standards, and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. The internal pedestrian pathway is permitted to remain private and
access-controlled for residents and visitors until such time that the City
of Phoenix installs each of the following:

i. A bicycle/pedestrian bridge over the Arizona Canal Trail between
25th Avenue and the I-17 Freeway;

ii. A public park space over the Arizona Canal Diversion channel
between 25th Avenue and the I-17 Freeway;

iii. A bicycle/pedestrian bridge over the I-17 Freeway between the
Arizona Canal and the Light Rail line.

b. Following the installation of the three items referenced in Stipulation 4.a
and the City notifying the property owner in writing of such completed
installations, the owner shall within 90 days submit to the City for
recordation an easement permitting public access over an internal
pedestrian pathway between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. daily.




c. The pedestrian pathway shall incorporate lighting as described below.

i. Fifteen-foot maximum height of lighting fixtures.

ii. A minimum of one foot candle illumination should be maintained
throughout the pathway.

iii. Uniform lighting should be placed along entire pathway to avoid
bright high glare areas and low visibility dark areas.

d. The pathway shall be a minimum of 6 feet in width and shall include a
minimum 5-foot-wide landscape strip along one side, with additional
enhancements chosen from the following options:

i. A minimum 5-foot-wide landscape strip on both sides of the
pathway, planted with a minimum of 2-inch caliper, single-trunk,
large canopy, shade trees placed 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, as approved or modified by the Planning
and Development Department; or

ii. A structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a
minimum of 75% shade coverage along one side of the pathway,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department; or

iii. An activated frontage on one side of the pathway that includes
pedestrian-oriented design elements such as seating areas, art,
water features, Walkable Urban Code Frontage Types (per
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Table 1305.1 Frontage Types), and
community gathering spaces to enhance pedestrian engagement
and activity, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.

5. A minimum 10,500-square foot area shall be provided as publicly
accessible open space, located in the northwest corner of the subject site as
depicted on the site plan date stamped September 16, 2024, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department. This area shall be
open for public access daily between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. but
need not be open for public access beyond those hours.

6. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.




7. All pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks) shall be shaded by a structure,
landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade,
except as otherwise approved per Stipulation No. 4.d., as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

8. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

9. A minimum of 5% of the required parking spaces shall include EV Capable
infrastructure.

10. The landscape setback along 25th Avenue shall be planted to include native
cacti or similar plants, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

11. Site lighting shall be provided at building entrances/exits and in public
assembly and parking areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

12. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

13. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-
Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized, except for existing
plants retained on-site, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.

14. All new natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of
basin, and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and
functional turf areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

15. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to
minimize maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite
landscape irrigation.

16. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and/or drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

17. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This




includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

18. Upon modification of the buildings adjacent to 25th Avenue that modifies the
cumulative footprint of both buildings, including demolition, by more than 15%
from that which is depicted on the site plan date stamped September 16, 2024,
a 6-foot detached sidewalk shall be required to be installed along 25th Avenue,
with a minimum 8-foot-wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and
back of curb that is planted to the following standards, as approved or modified
by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, drought-tolerant,
shade trees planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

19. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

20. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

21. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

22. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the




decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of February,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-129-24-3

PARCEL NO. 2:

A PORTION OF LOT 2, OF CANYON CORPORATE PLAZA, RECORDED IN BOOK
461, PAGE 20, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS (M.C.R.), LYING WITHIN SECTION
25, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE
AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 2, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 24
MINUTES 36 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 475.64 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST BOUNDARY, NORTH 89 DEGREES 40 MINUTES
34 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 431.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
68.53 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
83.64 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
410.87 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 2;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 24
SECONDS EAST,443.06 FEET;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY SOUTH 89 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 53
SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 69.63 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT 1 /2 OF ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AS
RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 337 OF DEEDS, PAGE 9, RECORDS
OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.

PARCEL NO. 3:

A PORTION OF LOT 2, OF CANYON CORPORATE PLAZA, RECORDED IN BOOK
461, PAGE 20, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS (M.C.R.), LYING WITHIN SECTION
25, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE
AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF LOT 2, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 24
MINUTES 36 SECONDS WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 475.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST BOUNDARY, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 24
MINUTES 36 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 280.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
285.08 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
168.55 FEET TO THE




BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 54.50
FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 40.67 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO
THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 05
SECONDS TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE HAVING A
RADIUS OF 29.50 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 45.18 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE
LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 87 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 05 SECONDS;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
54.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
151.30 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEAST HAVING A
RADIUS OF 41.50 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 32.54 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO
THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 19
SECONDS;
THENCE NORTH 44 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
259.56 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
182.98 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
40.61 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 44 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
75.62 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
94.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 43 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 02 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
28.13 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
73.37 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 44 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
76.85 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
27.14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH OD DEGREES 30 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE
OF 30.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
83.64 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
68.53 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
431.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT 1 /2 OF ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AS
RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 337 OF DEEDS, PAGE 9, RECORDS
OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.




LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER CHICAGO TITLE AGENCY, INC., COMMITMENT FOR
TITLE INSURANCE WITH FILE NO. CT347240041, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
OF MARCH 4, 2024.







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-151-24-5 -
Northeast Corner of 39th Avenue and Grand Avenue (Ordinance G-7357) -
District 5

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) and R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) to R-
4A (Multifamily Residence - General) for multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: R-3 (1.62 acres) and R1-6 (5.27 acres)
Proposed Zoning: R-4A
Acreage: 6.89
Proposal: Multifamily residential

Owner: School District No. 68
Applicant: UMOM Housing 11, LLC
Representative: Benjamin Graff, Quarles & Brady LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Alhambra Village Planning Committee heard this item on December
17, 2024, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with a
modification, by a vote of 11-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on January 2, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the Alhambra Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Northeast corner of 39th Avenue and Grand Avenue
Council District: 5
Parcel Address: 4510 N. 37th Avenue, 3800 Grand Avenue, and 3781 W. Campbell
Avenue

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and



Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-151-24-5) FROM R-3 (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) AND R1-6 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R-4A (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE –
GENERAL).
____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 6.89-acre site located at northeast corner of

39th Avenue and Grand Avenue in a portion of Section 22, Township 2 North, Range 2

East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from 1.62 acres of

“R-3” (Multifamily Residence District) and 5.27 acres of “R1-6” (Single-Family

Residence District) to “R-4A” (Multifamily Residence – General).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. A minimum of one pedestrian access point connecting directly to Grand
Avenue shall be provided at the southwestern corner of the site, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Secure bicycle parking shall be provided per Section 1307 of the Zoning
Ordinance.

b. Guest bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.05
spaces per dwelling unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces required.

c. A minimum of 10 percent of the provided bicycle parking spaces shall
include standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging
capabilities.

d. Bicycle parking spaces shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade.

e. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
on site within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance, and
separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The
repair station shall include, but not be limited to:

i. Standard repair tools affixed to the station;

ii. A tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the
ground;

iii. A bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin
freely while making adjustments to the bike.

4. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, with
a minimum five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work




with the Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

5. A minimum of 3% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include EV
Capable infrastructure.

6. All internal pedestrian pathways shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or
a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

7. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

8. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, shade trees, or a combination thereof.

9. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-
Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.

10. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to
minimize maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite
landscape irrigation.

12. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

13. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

14. The sidewalk along Grand Avenue, exclusive of the sidewalk adjacent to the
westbound right-turn deceleration lane, shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width
and detached with a minimum 4-foot-wide landscape strip located between the




sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, or as
approved by the Arizona Department of Transportation.

a. Shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to
achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

15. The sidewalk along 39th Avenue shall be a minimum of 6 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 8-foot-wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted
20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to
achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

16. A minimum 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
east side of 39th Avenue.

17. Existing SRP facilities along 39th Avenue are to be relocated outside of City
right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Street Transportation
Department. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer
require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval.

18. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) must be submitted to both the City of Phoenix
and the Arizona Department of Transportation. Development shall adhere to
the recommendations of the TIA for the improvements to the 39th Avenue and
Grand Avenue intersection, before preliminary site plan approval is granted, as
accepted by the City of Phoenix and the Arizona Department of Transportation.

19. All access control for the site shall be determined through the accepted
recommendations of the TIA by the City of Phoenix and the Arizona
Department of Transportation.

20. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with




paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

21. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.

22. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

23. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of February,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-151-24-5

DESCRIPTION OF 3832 GRAND A VENUE
AND PORTION OF 4510 N. 37TH A VENUE
PHOENIX, AZ 85019

THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH,
RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A 3-INCH CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE
(DOWN 0. 7 FEET) MARKING THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 22, FROM WHICH A 3-INCH CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAP IN
HANDHOLE (DOWN 0.5 FEET) MARKING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF
SAID SECTION 22 BEARS NORTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 43 SECONDS
EAST 5,260.86 FEET, SAID DESCRIBED LINE BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS
FOR THIS DESCRIPTION;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 2,622.33
FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION
22 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST
238.21 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 284.97 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST 125. 00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 95.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST 109.81 FEET
TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST 292.65 FEET
ALONG SAID NORTH LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 09 SECONDS WEST 185.33 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST 10.02 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST 407.49 FEET
TO A NAIL WITH NO /DENT/FICA TION ON THE NORTHEAST RIGHT OF WAY
LINE OF GRAND A VENUE (U.S. 60);
THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 52.00 FEET
TO THE CENTERLINE OF GRAND A VENUE (U.S. 60);
THENCE NORTH 44 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 882.66 FEET
ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
COMPRISING 6.879 ACRES OR 299,630 FEET MORE OR LESS.







Report

Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-110-24-8 -
Approximately 475 Feet South of the Southeast Corner of 32nd Street and
Southern Avenue (Ordinance G-7356) - District 8

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
S-1 BAOD (Ranch or Farm Residence, Baseline Area Overlay District) to P-1 BAOD
(Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited, Baseline Area Overlay District) for a parking
lot.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 BAOD
Proposed Zoning: P-1 BAOD
Acreage: 1.00
Proposal: Parking lot

Owner: Patricia Christofolo, 32nd St Property, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Kay Shepard

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this item on
December 10, 2024, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with
modified stipulations and an additional stipulation, by a vote of 10-0-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on January 2, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the staff memo dated December 27, 2024, with a
modification, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Approximately 475 feet south of the southeast corner of 32nd Street and Southern
Avenue
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 6075 S. 32nd Street






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-110-24-8) FROM S-1 BAOD (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE, BASELINE AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO P-1
BAOD (PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE PARKING, LIMITED,
BASELINE AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT).
____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.00 acre site located approximately 475 feet

south of the southeast corner of 32nd Street and Southern Avenue in a portion of

Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A,” is hereby changed from “S-1 BAOD” (Ranch or Farm Residence, Baseline Area

Overlay District) to “P-1 BAOD” (Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited, Baseline Area

Overlay District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. A minimum 30-foot-wide, average 35-foot-wide landscape setback shall be
provided along 32nd Street and planted to the MUA streetscape landscape
standards as listed in Section 649.H.3 in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. A minimum 10-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the north,
east, and south perimeter of the site, excluding a driveway to the north, and
planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy, shade trees planted 20 feet
on center, or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents, and vegetative
groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the landscape areas to achieve a
minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. If perimeter fencing is proposed, the fencing shall be a minimum of 75% view
fencing, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. A minimum of 3% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include EV
Capable infrastructure.

6. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees. Landscaping shall be
dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25% shade, as approved
by Planning and Development Department.

7. All pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks) shall be shaded by a structure,
landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. Only landscape materials listed in the Mixed Use Agricultural (MUA) District
and the Baseline Area Overlay District (BAOD) shall be utilized, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.

9. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient




WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to
minimize maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite
landscape irrigation.

10. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and/or drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

11. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

12. The existing Rapid Flashing Beacon (RFB) shall be removed and replaced with
a HAWK pedestrian crossing that shall be fully funded and constructed at the
current location of the existing RFB, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department.

13. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

14. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

15. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

16. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

17. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the applicant shall apply to use
alternative dustproofing materials on the site.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the




decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of February,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-110-24-8

The South 170.80 feet of the following described parcels:

Parcel No. 1:

The North half of Lot 40, Bartlett-Heard Lands, according to Book 13 of Maps,
page 35, records of Maricopa County, Arizona;

Except the East 402.50 feet thereof
and; Except the North 33 feet
thereof, and;
Except the road way as created under deed recorded 90-227090 and under deed
recorded 04-824562. Parcel No. 2:
The North half of the West 82.50 feet of the East 402.50 feet of Lot 40, Bartlett-
Heard Lands, according to Book 13 of Maps, page 35, records of Maricopa
County, Arizona;

Except the North 33 feet thereof, and;

Except road way as created under deed recorded 90-227090 and under deed
recorded 04-824562.

Section: 36 Township: 1N Range: 3E

APN # 122-81-022-D

Gross Acres 1







Report

Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-119-24-2 -
Southeast Corner of 56th Street and Shea Boulevard (Ordinance G-7359) -
District 2

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-119-
24-2 and rezone the site from RE-43 (One-Family Residence) to C-O/G-O (Restricted
Commercial, General Office Option) to allow office.

Summary
Current Zoning: RE-43
Proposed Zoning: C-O/G-O
Acreage: 2.59
Proposal: Office

Owner: Ronald Urman, 56 & Shea Holdings, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee was scheduled to hear
this item on December 2, 2024, for recommendation; however, there was no quorum.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on January 2, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with two additional stipulations,
by a vote of 6-2.

Location
Southeast corner of 56th Street and Shea Boulevard
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 10425, 10433, 10437, and 10455 N. 56th Street

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-119-24-2) FROM RE-43 (ONE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE) TO C-O/G-O (RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL,
GENERAL OFFICE OPTION).
____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 2.59-acre property located at the southeast

corner of 56th Street and Shea Boulevard in a portion of Section 28, Township 3 North,

Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from

“RE-43” (One-Family Residence) to “C-O/G-O” (Restricted Commercial, General Office

Option).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The elevations shall contain design elements of residential character, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. A minimum 20-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the north
property line, adjacent to Shea Boulevard, and shall be planted with minimum 2-
inch caliper, large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly
distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live
coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The west 25 feet of the property, measured from the west property line adjacent
to 56th Street, shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy,
shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs,
accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the
landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum 10-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the south
and east property lines and shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and
shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the
landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

5. A minimum of 10% of surface parking areas (exclusive of required/stipulated
landscape setbacks) shall be landscaped. Surface parking areas shall achieve a
minimum of 25% shade with minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy,
shade trees, dispersed throughout the landscape areas, as approved by
Planning and Development Department.

6. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. All bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks), and transit stops
shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to
provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. Bicycle parking shall be provided per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and shall be provided through Inverted U and/or
artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the requirements
of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere


to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive
Bicycle Master Plan.

9. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

10. A minimum of 5% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include Electric
Vehicle (EV) Installed Infrastructure and a minimum of 20% of the vehicle
parking spaces within the underground parking garage shall include EV
Capable spaces, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

12. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-
Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized, as approved or modified
by the Planning and Development Department.

13. Natural turf shall only be utilized in required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas in common areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

14. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.

15. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to minimize
maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite landscape
irrigation.

16. Provide a landscape irrigation plan that includes zones to establish the amount
of irrigation to apply based on maturity and type of the landscaping. Irrigation
should be applied efficiently based on the maturity and need for the vegetation.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Phoenix Water Efficiency
Checkup program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

18. The existing bus pad on eastbound Shea Boulevard, adjacent to the
development, shall be retained.



19. A minimum of 65 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
south half of Shea Boulevard, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

20. The streetscape beginning at the back of curb along the south side of Shea
Boulevard on both sides of the sidewalk, adjacent to the development, shall be
replenished with minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees
planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents and
vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature height of two feet evenly
distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a minimum of 75% live
coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

21. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 8-foot-wide
landscape strip located between the back of curb and sidewalk shall be
constructed on the east side of 56th Street, adjacent to the development,
planted to the following standards and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees, planted
20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to
achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

22. An enhanced pedestrian connection shall be provided on the Shea Boulevard
frontage to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent transit stop, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

23. All existing overhead utilities within the public right-of-way, adjacent to the
development, and on-site shall be undergrounded. The developer shall
coordinate with all affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

24. Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb and gutter. Also, any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets shall
be replaced and all off-site improvements shall be upgraded to be in compliance
with current ADA guidelines.

25. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.



26. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

27. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

28. The location(s) of any driveway accessing the property from 56th Street shall be
per the accepted Traffic Impact Analysis by the Street Transportation
Department.

29. A traffic control device and signage shall be provided to discourage left-out
turning movements from the property on to 56th Street.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 5th day of February,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-119-24-2

A PORTION OF COUNTRY CLUB ACRES RECORDED IN BOOK 70, PAGE 21 OF
THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY LOCATED IN SECTION 28,
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH AND RANGE 4 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE
AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.

BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 28;

THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 28, A DISTANCE OF 337.59 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 09 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 337.46’ TO
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 37 OF SAID COUNTRY CLUB ACRES;

THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
337.57 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 28;

THENCE NORTH, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 28, A DISTANCE OF
337.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING, 2.6141 ACRES.




ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

Paradise Valley Village Planning December 2, 2024
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: January 2, 2025

Request From: RE-43 (One-Family Residence) (2.59 acres)
Request To: C-O/G-O (Restricted Commercial, General
Office Option) (2.59 acres)
Proposal: Office
Location: Southeast corner of 56th Street and Shea
Boulevard
Owner: Ronald Urman, 56 & Shea Holdings, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

General Plan Conformity
General Plan Land Use Map Designation Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre

Street Classification Shea Boulevard Major Arterial 40-foot south half street
Map Designation 56th Street Minor Collector 40-foot east half street
CONNET PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The proposal for an office use is a reasonable level of increased intensity and as
stipulated, will be respectful of local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods. The
building elevations will be residential in character, and there will be an enhanced buffer
adjacent to the single-family residentially zoned properties.

CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; DESIGN PRINCIPLE:
Development should include convenient bicycle parking.

As stipulated, the proposal will provide bicycle parking. This bicycle parking will provide
employees and visitors with an alternative mode of transportation to the site.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY; TREES AND SHADE; DESIGN
PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development and
redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

As stipulated, the proposal will provide tree-shaded sidewalks along both street
frontages, will plant trees within perimeter landscape setbacks and surface parking
areas, and will shade bicycle parking, pedestrian walkways, the transit stop along Shea
Boulevard, and surface parking areas.



Applicable Plan, Overlays, and Initiatives
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 6.

Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 7.

Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 8.

Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 9.

Transportation Electrification Action Plan: See Background Item No. 10.

Phoenix Climate Action Plan: See Background Item No. 11.

Conservation Measures for New Development: See Background Item No. 12.



Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
Sports field, basketball court, and
On Site RE-43
playground
North (across
Golf resort and single-family residence RH and RE-35
Shea Boulevard)
South Vacant RE-43
East Church and monopalm RE-43
West (across 56th
Church and private school RE-43
Street)




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

C-O/G-O (Restricted Commercial, General Office Option)

Standards Requirements Proposed

Minimum Gross Lot Area 1 acre 2.59 acres (Met)
Maximum Lot Coverage 40%, exclusive of carports; 10% 39.56% (Met)
for open carports, not counted
towards lot coverage
Maximum Building Height 25 feet 25 feet (Met)
Minimum Building Setbacks
Front Yard 20 feet 20 feet – approx. 27 feet
(North, Shea Boulevard) (Met)
Street Side Yard 10 feet 10 feet (Met)
(West, 56th Street)
Side Yard 10 feet 80 feet, 6 inches –
(East) approx. 156 feet (Met)
Rear Yard 25 feet Approx. 29 feet –
(South) approx. 34 feet (Met)
Minimum Parking 136 spaces required 136 spaces (Met)
1 space per 200 square feet of
gross floor area between
exterior walls
27,107 square feet gross floor
area proposed
*Site plan modification or variance required

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 2.59 acres located at the southeast corner of 56th
Street and Shea Boulevard from RE-43 (One-Family Residence) to C-O/G-O
(Restricted Commercial, General Office Option) to allow office uses.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
2. The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Residential 1
to 2 dwelling units per acre. The proposal is inconsistent with the General Plan
Land Use Map designation; however, a minor General Plan Amendment is not
required since the site is less than 10 gross acres in size.

The General Plan Land Use Map designation is also Residential 1 to 2 dwelling
units per acre to the north, east, and south of the subject site.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

The General Plan Land Use Map designation for a portion to the north of the
subject site, across Shea Boulevard, is designated as Parks/Open Space –
Privately Owned.

The General Plan Land Use Map designation to the west of the subject site,
across 56th Street, is designated as Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre.




General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
3. To the north of the subject site, across Shea Boulevard, is a golf resort and a
single-family residence, zoned RH (Resort District) and RE-35 (Single-Family
Residence District), respectively.

To the south of the subject site is vacant land zoned RE-43 (One-Family
Residence).

To the east of the subject site is a church and monopalm zoned RE-43.

To the west of the subject site, across 56th Street, is a church and private school
zoned RE-43.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024




Zoning Sketch Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

PROPOSAL
4. Site Plan
The site plan, attached as an exhibit, proposes two medical office buildings with
a total building footprint of 34,957 square feet. Vehicular access is proposed
along 56th Street and Shea Boulevard. A total of 136 parking spaces are
proposed, including six accessible parking spaces and 44 underground parking
spaces. Two pedestrian pathways are proposed to connect to the sidewalk along
56th Street and one pedestrian pathway to connect to the sidewalk along Shea
Boulevard. An 18-foot-wide pedestrian walkway is proposed to connect the north
and south buildings across the drive aisle. Bicycle parking is proposed near the
north building.

To enhance the streetscape along Shea Boulevard, and to be more compatible
with surrounding land uses and zoning, staff recommends that a minimum 20-
foot landscape setback be provided along the north property line, adjacent to
Shea Boulevard, planted with minimum two-inch caliper shade trees 20 feet on
center, and a minimum of 50 percent live coverage. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 2.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024


To enhance the streetscape along 56th Street to be consistent with the
streetscape along Shea Boulevard, and to be more compatible with surrounding
land uses and zoning, staff recommends that the west 25 feet of the property
measured from the west property line (the 25-foot right-of-way easement) be
landscaped with minimum two-inch caliper shade trees 20 feet on center and a
minimum of 50 percent live coverage. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 3.

To provide an enhanced buffer adjacent to single-family residentially zoned
properties to the east and south, staff recommends that a minimum 10-foot
landscape setback be provided along the south and east property lines, planted
with minimum two-inch caliper shade trees 20 feet on center, and a minimum of
50 percent live coverage. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4.

To enhance surface parking lot area landscaping and shading, staff recommends
that a minimum of 10 percent of surface parking areas, exclusive of landscape
required/stipulated setbacks, be landscaped and achieve a minimum of 25
percent shade with minimum two-inch caliper shade trees. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 5.

To enhance pedestrian safety, staff recommends that where pedestrian
walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway be constructed with a material or
pavement treatment that visually contrasts the pathway with the parking and
drive aisle surfaces. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 6.

To enhance bicyclist, pedestrian, and transit rider comfort, staff recommends that
all bicycle parking spaces, pedestrian pathways, and transit stops be shaded a
minimum of 75 percent. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 7.

Since the existing landscape strip between the back of curb and detached
sidewalk along Shea Boulevard has missing landscape plantings, staff
recommends the streetscape be replenished with minimum two-inch caliper
shade trees 20 feet on center and a minimum of 75 percent live coverage, in
order to increase pedestrian comfort and safety. This is addressed in Stipulation
No. 20.

5. Elevations
The building elevations and renderings, attached as an exhibit, proposes a
contemporary building design with a maximum building height of 25 feet.

To ensure the proposal remains in character with the surrounding residentially
zoned area, staff recommends that the elevations contain design elements of
residential character. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 1.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITATIVES
6. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and
development process. By investing in trees and the urban forest, the city can
reduce its carbon footprint, decrease energy costs, reduce storm water runoff,
increase biodiversity, address the urban heat island effect, clean the air, and
increase property values. In addition, trees can help to create walkable streets
and vibrant pedestrian places. Staff is recommending robust tree planting
standards, including perimeter landscape setbacks with minimum two-inch
caliper shade trees 20 feet on center, surface parking lot areas to be planted with
minimum two-inch caliper shade trees to achieve 25 percent shade, bicycle
parking spaces, pedestrian pathways, and transit stops to be shaded a minimum
of 75 percent, and detached tree-shaded sidewalks along both street frontages.
These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 through 5, 7, 20, and 21.

7. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To support these principles and to
enhance the streetscape, staff recommends the following:
• Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of alternative materials or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces.
• All bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks) and transit
stops shall be shaded a minimum of 75 percent.
• The streetscape along the south side of Shea Boulevard be replenished
with minimum two-inch caliper shade trees 20 feet on center and a
minimum of 75 percent live coverage.
• A minimum six-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum
eight-foot-wide landscape strip be constructed on the east side of 56th
Street, adjacent to the development, planted with minimum two-inch
caliper shade trees 20 feet on center and 75 percent live coverage.
• An enhanced pedestrian connection be provided on the Shea Boulevard
frontage to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent transit stop.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 6, 7, and 20 through 22.

8. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-



Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. As stipulated, the project will provide bicycle parking per the
requirements of Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, located near
building entrances and installed per the requirements in the City’s Walkable
Urban (WU) Code. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 8.

9. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal
to become a zero-waste city, as part of the City’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use developments
meeting certain criteria. The applicant’s submittal materials indicate that the
proposal will provide dedicated recycling containers in each refuse enclosure
throughout the site and dedicated recycling bins in all common areas.

10. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation
Electrification Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of
transportation is both a national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for
better air quality, a reduction in carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle
operating and maintenance costs. Businesses, governments and the public are
signaling strong future demand for electric vehicles (EVs), and many automobile
manufacturers have declared plans for a transition to fully electric offerings within
the coming decade. The Plan contains policy initiatives to prepare the City for a
future filled with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-mobility equity, and
outlines a roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV infrastructure needs
of 280,000 EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan to accelerate public
adoption of electric vehicles through workplace, business, and multifamily
charging infrastructure recommends a standard stipulation for rezoning cases to
provide EV charging infrastructure. To enforce the goals of the Plan, staff
recommends a minimum of 10 percent of the required bicycle parking spaces
include electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, that a
minimum of five percent of the required vehicle parking spaces include EV
Installed infrastructure, and that a minimum of 20 percent of the vehicle parking
spaces within the underground parking garage include EV Capable
infrastructure. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 9 and 10.

11. Phoenix Climate Action Plan
In October 2021, the Phoenix City Council approved the Climate Action Plan.
The Climate Action Plan will serve as a long-term plan to achieve greenhouse
gas emissions reductions and resiliency goals from local operations and
community activities as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change. This
plan contains policy and initiatives regarding stationary energy, transportation,




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

waste management, air quality, local food systems, heat, and water. Goal W2
(Water), Action W2.4, pertains to the implementation of the Greater Phoenix
Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative
Stormwater Management to benefit the environment, promote water
conservation, reduce urban heat, improve the public health, and create additional
green spaces. This goal is addressed in Stipulation No. 11, which requires a
minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater
management to be implemented in this development.

12. Conservation Measures for New Development
In June 2023, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Conservation Measures for
New Development policy as part of a resolution addressing the future water
consumption of new development (Resolution 22129). This resolution addresses
the future water consumption of new development to support one of the City’s
Five Core Values in the General Plan which calls for Phoenix to “Build the
Sustainable Desert City”. The Conservation Measures for New Development
policy includes direction to develop standards for consideration as stipulations for
all rezoning cases that will address best practices related to water usage in nine
specific categories. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 11 through 17, which
addresses the following:
• A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements to be
implemented.
• Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area
Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List are to be utilized.
• Natural turf is to only be utilized in required retention areas (at the bottom
of the basin, and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization)
and functional turf areas.
• Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines are to be utilized in any
turf areas to reduce water waste.
• Landscaping is to be maintained by permanent and automatic/water
efficient WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart
controller) to minimize maintenance and irrigation water consumption for
all on and offsite landscape irrigation.
• A landscape irrigation plan to be provided that includes zoned to establish
the amount of irrigation to apply based on maturity and type of
landscaping. Irrigation to be applied efficiently based on the maturity and
need for the vegetation.
• Prior to final site plan approval, documentation is to be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Phoenix Water Efficiency
Checkup program for a minimum of 10 years.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
13. At the time this staff report was written, staff had not received any letters of
opposition or support.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
14. Public Transit Department
The Public Transit Department commented that the bus pad on eastbound Shea
Boulevard shall be retained. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 18.

15. Street Transportation Department
The Street Transportation Department requested the following:
• A minimum of 65 feet of right-of way be dedicated and constructed for the
south half of Shea Boulevard.
• A minimum six-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum
eight-foot-wide landscape area be constructed on the east side of 56th
Street, adjacent to the development.
• An enhanced pedestrian connection be provided on the Shea Boulevard
frontage to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent transit stop.
• That all existing overhead utilities within the public right-of-way, adjacent
to the development, and on-site be undergrounded.
• That any broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on
all streets be replaced, and that all off-site improvements be upgraded to
be in compliance with current ADA guidelines.
• That all streets be constructed with all required elements and to ADA
requirements.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 19 and 21 through 25.

OTHER
16. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in
the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the
time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 26.

17. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution
in Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required
by the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to
require the form be completed and submitted prior to final site plan approval. This
is addressed in Stipulation No. 27.

18. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.
Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

Findings

1. As stipulated, the proposal increases shade tree canopy coverage along public
sidewalks, bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways, and transit stops.

2. As stipulated, the proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses and zoning and
provides an increased buffer adjacent to single-family residential zoning.

3. As stipulated, the proposal supports efforts from various plans, policies, and
initiatives, including the Tree and Shade Master Plan, the Complete Streets
Guiding Principles, the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, the Transportation
Electrification Action Plan, the Phoenix Climate Action Plan, and the
Conservation Measures for New Development policy.

Stipulations

1. The elevations shall contain design elements of residential character, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. A minimum 20-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the north
property line, adjacent to Shea Boulevard, and shall be planted with minimum 2-
inch caliper, large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly
distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live
coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The west 25 feet of the property, measured from the west property line adjacent
to 56th Street, shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy,
shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs,
accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the
landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum 10-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the south
and east property lines and shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and
shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the
landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

5. A minimum of 10% of surface parking areas (exclusive of required/stipulated
landscape setbacks) shall be landscaped. Surface parking areas shall achieve a
minimum of 25% shade with minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy,
shade trees, dispersed throughout the landscape areas, as approved by
Planning and Development Department.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024


6. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. All bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks), and transit stops
shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to
provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. Bicycle parking shall be provided per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and shall be provided through Inverted U and/or
artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the requirements
of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere
to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive
Bicycle Master Plan.

9. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

10. A minimum of 5% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include Electric
Vehicle (EV) Installed Infrastructure and a minimum of 20% of the vehicle
parking spaces within the underground parking garage shall include EV
Capable spaces, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

12. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-
Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized, as approved or modified
by the Planning and Development Department.

13. Natural turf shall only be utilized in required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas in common areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

14. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf
areas to reduce water waste.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024


15. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to minimize
maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite landscape
irrigation.

16. Provide a landscape irrigation plan that includes zones to establish the amount
of irrigation to apply based on maturity and type of the landscaping. Irrigation
should be applied efficiently based on the maturity and need for the vegetation.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Phoenix Water Efficiency
Checkup program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

18. The existing bus pad on eastbound Shea Boulevard, adjacent to the
development, shall be retained.

19. A minimum of 65 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the
south half of Shea Boulevard, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

20. The streetscape beginning at the back of curb along the south side of Shea
Boulevard on both sides of the sidewalk, adjacent to the development, shall be
replenished with minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees
planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents and
vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature height of two feet evenly
distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a minimum of 75% live
coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

21. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 8-foot-wide
landscape strip located between the back of curb and sidewalk shall be
constructed on the east side of 56th Street, adjacent to the development,
planted to the following standards and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees, planted
20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to
achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

22. An enhanced pedestrian connection shall be provided on the Shea Boulevard
frontage to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent transit stop, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

23. All existing overhead utilities within the public right-of-way, adjacent to the
development, and on-site shall be undergrounded. The developer shall
coordinate with all affected utility companies for their review and permitting.

24. Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb and gutter. Also, any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets shall
be replaced and all off-site improvements shall be upgraded to be in compliance
with current ADA guidelines.

25. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

26. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

27. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

Writer
Adrian Zambrano
November 22, 2024

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Zoning Sketch Map
Aerial Sketch Map
Site Plan date stamped November 8, 2024
Elevations date stamped November 7, 2024 (3 pages)




Staff Report: Z-119-24-2
November 22, 2024

Rendering date stamped November 7, 2024




MERCER LN




55TH ST
RE-35 LEITH L
N
RH *
SAHUARO DR RE-35 CLINTON ST
Z-370-84




54TH ST 56TH ST

RE-35
SHEA BLVD

R-O * RE-43
Z-43-22 Z-30-98



CANNON DR


COCHISE
R1-10 *
55TH PL
Z-128-89

57TH ST
RE-43
58TH ST
ALAN LN RD
PAD
RE-35
54TH PL R1-10*
Z-61-17

RE-35
BERYL AVE




¯ Miles
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
UNION HILLS DR
BELL RD
GREENWAY RD
Z-119-24-2

0 0.04 0.07 0.14
THUNDERBIRD RD
CACTUS RD
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE SHEA BLVD




SCOTTSDALE RD
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
16TH ST 40TH ST

24TH ST TATUM BLVD

32ND ST 56TH ST
64TH ST

REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
FROM: RE-43 ( 2.59 ac.)
DATE:
8/28/2024
APPLICATION NO: Z-119-24-2 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
C-O/G-O ( 2.59 ac.)
2.59 Acres QS 28-41 K-11
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
RE-43 2 N/A
C-O/G-O N/A N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 176
Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-119-24.aprx
MERCER LN




55TH ST
RE-35 LEITH L
N
RH *
SAHUARO DR RE-35 CLINTON ST
Z-370-84




54TH ST 56TH ST

RE-35
SHEA BLVD

R-O * RE-43
Z-43-22 Z-30-98



CANNON DR


COCHISE
R1-10 *
55TH PL
Z-128-89

57TH ST
RE-43
58TH ST
ALAN LN RD
PAD
RE-35
54TH PL R1-10*
Z-61-17

RE-35
BERYL AVE




¯ Miles
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
UNION HILLS DR
BELL RD
GREENWAY RD
Z-119-24-2

0 0.04 0.07 0.14
THUNDERBIRD RD
CACTUS RD
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE SHEA BLVD




SCOTTSDALE RD
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
16TH ST 40TH ST

24TH ST TATUM BLVD

32ND ST 56TH ST
64TH ST

REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
FROM: RE-43 ( 2.59 ac.)
DATE:
8/28/2024
APPLICATION NO: Z-119-24-2 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
C-O/G-O ( 2.59 ac.)
2.59 Acres QS 28-41 K-11
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
RE-43 2 N/A
C-O/G-O N/A N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 177
Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-119-24.aprx
„F‰)Ɛ{X
cƐck‰)„ šFFcF‰¥Ɛa
{
‡ $&&(66727+(6,7(0867%()520$1
(&$&7865'
$57(5,$/675((7 (6+($%/9'
     &$ 
‡ $//1(:255(/2&$7('(/(&75,&/,1(6
5':<(607 5 6,'(67%.
N92560$//(5&20081,&$7,216$1'
&$%/(7(/,9,6,21$1'$//2135(0,6( 17+67 17+67
:,5,1*6+28/'%(3/$&('81'(5*5281'
) „B)
Xš%   ,1$//'(9(/230(176:+(5(9,6,%/()520 6+($%/9'
5: 5  
  352-(&7
675((7625$'-2,1,1*3523(57,(6
/2&$7,21
6,'(67%.  $,,%
(;,67,1*%866723 ‡ )8785(:,'7+/,1(6$5(+(5(
(;&$7&+ )2& 72 &/
5(7$,1%8667233$'21 (67$%/,6+('$1'6+$//$33/<727+26(
%$6,1 ($67%281'6+($%/9'
3523(57< /,1(
35,0$5<(175<(;,7
1ƒ : 675((76'(6,*1$7('$1'6+2:1217+(
17$780%/9'
(6+($%/9'
 675((7&/$6,),&$7,210$37+()8785(
 30(',$1     :,'7+/,1(66+$//%((67$%/,6+('62 '28%/(75((5$1&+5'
5(675,&7(''5,9(:$<
38( 38( 7+$721(+$/)2)7+(',67$1&(6+2:1
  217+(675((7&/$6,),&$7,210$36+$//
%(21($&+6,'(2)7+(&(17(5/,1(2) kœc)
7+(25,*,1$/5,*+72):$<
5':< (607 (;,67,1*),5(  $
+<'5$17  6+($+2/',1*6//&
‡ )520$1'$)7(57+((67$%/,6+0(172) (*5((1:$<5'67(
$1<)8785(:,'7+/,1($63529,'(' 6&2776'$/($=
+(5(,1$//<$5'6%<7+,625',1$1&(  
  6:  ;  6+$//%(0($685(')5206$,')8785(
 ;  (,'7+/,1(,1/,(82)7+()5217256,'(
9,6,%,/,7< %)„F:c
9,6,%,/,7< /,1(2)7+(/27$627+(5:,6(5(48,5('
    75,$1*/(
75,$1*/( $1':+(5(12<$5',65(48,5('81'(5 '5(:(77:25.6$5&+,7(&785(
7+(7(5062)7+,625',1$1&(12 (67(7621'568,7(
)517 67%. %8,/',1*66+$//%((5(&7('25029(' 6&2776'$/($=
1($5(5727+()5217256,'(/,1(2)$1<  
/277+$16$,')8785(:,'7+/,1(
 25'12*
{kI)‰Ɛc

‰Fš)


  352326('352-(&7&216,6762)21(
  ‰
88FƐck‰)„ 6725<$1'21(6725<2)),&(%8,/',1*6
)2& 72 &/ 6: 
7+(,17(17,6723529,'($+,*+(1'0(',&$/
 '(9(/230(176+$//&203/<:,7+ 2)),&(:,7+/8;85<63$&(6$1'0$7(5,$/6
 67,38/$7,2162)3(1',1*5(=21,1*
&$6($33/,&$7,21 X):
XƐ%)„F{‰Fkc
  ,17(56(&7,215,*+72):$<
(;&$7&+  '(',&$7,21$1'52$':$<'(6,*1
%$6,1 $3257,212)&28175<&/8%$&5(6
6+$//&203/<:,7+7+(&,7<2)
      5(&25'(',1%22.3$*(2)7+(
3+2(1,;)/$5(',17(56(&7,21'(6,*1
 2)),&,$/5(&25'62)0$5,&23$&2817<
*8,/',1(6
   /2&$7(',16(&7,2172:16+,31257+
 ,03529(0(17672,1&/8'(3$9,1*
$1'5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1'6$/75,9(5
&85%*877(5&85%5$036 
%$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<
 '(7$&+('6,'(:$/.$1'27+(5
$63+$/7 $5,=21$'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6
a
FcƐck‰B  ,1&,'(17$/6$/21*17+676+$//%(
  3$5.,1* 3529,'('
6) 0$1(89(5,1* %(*,11,1*$77+(1257+:(67&251(52)
 $0,1,080 2)727$/3$9(0(176+$//
$5($  6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(6287+'(*5((6
%(3529,'('$/21*17+67)257+(
  
0,187(66(&21'6($67$/21*7+(1257+
  )8///(1*7+2)7+(6,7()5217$*(
6: $ /,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$',67$1&(2)
$'(48$7(75$16,7,216$1')8//'(37+
6: )((77+(1&(6287+'(*5((60,187(6
 $63+$/77$3(56727+($'-2,1,1*
352326('))  52 :(67$',67$1&(2)¶ 727+(
52$':$<6+$//%(3529,'('
  352326('  6287+($67&251(52)/272)6$,'
(0(5*(1&<$&&(663(50,7 1257+)'& 1(:&+85&+2)3+2(1,; &28175<&/8%$&5(67+(1&(1257+
  81'(56(3(5$7(3(50,7  )520  '(*5((60,187(66(&21'6:(67$
(;,67,1*)+ (6+($%/9'
8F)Ɛ„{FcUX)„ ',67$1&(2))((772$32,17217+(
5:5 
6&2776'$/($= :(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(1257+
3+2(1,;),5(&2'( $/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$
 ',67$1&(2))((7727+(32,172)
‡ $8720$7,&),5(635,1./(56<67(0 %(*,11,1*
726,7(:$// 
%,&<&/( 5(48,5('9,$6(3(5$7(68%0,77$/
  6: 3$5.,1* 
‡ 81'(5*5281'),5(/,1(5(48,5('9,$ '(6&5,%('3$5&(/&217$,1,1*$&5(6
6(3(5$7(68%0,77$/
„F‰)Ɛ{X
cƐck‰)„
522)  
{k{k„)%Ɛ%)„F:cƐ%
‰
 '(9(/230(17$1'86(2)7+,66,7(:,//
29(5+$1*
 ;  &21)250:,7+$//$33/,&$%/(&2'(6
$%29(
9,6,%,/,7< 6287+ 3$5.,1*/(9(/ 6) $1'25',1$1&(6
75,$1*/(   6287+ 0$,1/(9(/ 6)  $//1(:255(/2&$7('87,/,7,(6:,//
6287+ 833(5/(9(/ 6) %(3/$&('81'(5*5281'
                 6)  $1</,*+7,1*:,//%(3/$&('62$672
',5(&7/,*+7$:$<)520$'-$&(17
1257+ 0$,1/(9(/ 6) 5(6,'(17,$/',675,&76$1':,//127
(;&(('21()227&$1'/($77+(
3523(57</,1( 727$/ 6) 3523(57</,1(1212,6(2'2525
$63+$/7 ),5(758&.$&&(66 9,%5$7,21:,//%((0,77('$7$1</(9(/
3$5.,1* 5287( (;&((',1*7+(*(1(5$//(9(/2)
  3523(57</,1( /276,=(6)
1ƒ ( 0$1(89(5,1* ,16,'(5$',86  12,6(2'25259,%5$7,21(0,77('%<
$5($ 3('&21&:.:< /27&29(5$*( 
&(17(55$',86  352326('6)  86(6,17+($5($2876,'(2)7+(6,7(
2876,'(5$',86   7<3  7<3 1ƒ (
 2:1(5 62)3523(57<$'-$&(1772
 $//2:('6) 
38%/,&5,*+762):$<:,//+$9(7+(
cƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰
 5(63216,%,/,7<)250$,17$,1,1*$//
            {k{k„)%Ɛ{
UFc:Ɛ%
‰
/$1'6&$3,1*/2&$7(':,7+7+(
  7<3 5,*+762):$<,1$&&25'$1&(:,7+
ŐǑċŁƆƐcƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰
 ;  0$,1/(9(/3$5.,1* 67$//6 $33529('3/$16
9,6,%,/,7< /2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* 67$//6  $//522)723(48,30(17$1'6$7(//,7(
75,$1*/(    
522) ',6+(66+$//%(6&5((1('727+(
29(5+$1* 67$1'$5'3$5.,1* ;  +(,*+72)7+(7$//(67(48,30(17
$%29(  $//6(59,&($5($66+$//%(6&5((1('
    &23&2'(& 72&21&($/75$6+&217$,1(56
0('2)),&(3$5.,1* 67$//3(56) /2$',1*'2&.675$16)250(56
352326('   %$&.)/2:35(9(17(56$1'27+(5
6287+)'& 0(&+$1,&$/25(/(&75,&$/(48,30(17
   
 )520 5(48,5('3$5.,1* 67$//6 )520(<(/(9(/$'-$&(1772$//
(;,67,1*)+ 3529,'('3$5.,1* 67$//6 38%/,&675((76
%$5%('5$=2525&21&(57,1$:,5(
{

%F„)Ɛš
XX)¥Ɛ
¬ƐíĂƞĂƗ
Ăƌ‰BƐ¼Ɛ„B)

      $&&(66,%/(3$5.,1* ; : $,6/( 6+$//127%(86('217+,66,7(:+(5(
.,9$6'(93$3346




9,6,%/()52038%/,&675((7625
a
FcƐ„kŽ‰B &23&2'(*&7$%/( $'-$&(175(6,'(17,$/$5($6
7267$//6$&&(66,%/(67$//6  $//6,*1$*(5(48,5(66(3$5$7(
     
6) 5(9,(:6$33529$/6$1'3(50,7612
  $63+$/7 $63+$/7 5(48,5('3$5.,1* 67$//6 6,*16$5($33529('3(57+,63/$1
%)œ)‰‰ƐƐœkU„Ɛ
åķ±ĞĮƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐ{X
c„Ä%)œ)‰‰œkU„ũka
3$5.,1* 3$5.,1* % 3529,'('3$5.,1* 67$//6
 0$1(89(5,1*   0$1(89(5,1*  ,&216(17727+(5(352'8&7,212)7+,66,7( ŤĚŇĻåƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐĂƐĝ ƗƐƆƐƗƐĝ ŁƐƗƐíƐí

352326('))  $5($ $5($ 5( 3/$13529,'('7+$7,)02',),&$7,216$5( ƆƐŐƐċƐċƐƐ)ũƐƐ„‰)‰„kcƐƐ%Ɛũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũ„ŽF‰)ƐƐƞƐǑƐċ
0$'(7+(352)(66,21$/6:+20$.(68&+
„ƐƐkƐ‰Ɛ‰Ɛ„Ɛ%Ɛ
ƐXƐ)ƐƐƐØƐƐ
Ɛ¬ƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐƞƐĂƐŐ
(0(5*(1&<$&&(663(50,7 5$26$1726+35$1((7$ &+$1*(6$6680()8//5(63216,%,/,7<$1'
    œƐœƐœƐƐƐũƐƐƐ%ƐƐ)ƐœƐ)Ɛ‰Ɛ‰ƐœƐkƐƐUƐ„ƐƐƐũƐƐƐƐkƐa
81'(56(3(5$7(3(50,7   /,$%,/,7<)257+(02',),(' 3257,2162)7+(
17+67 3/$1
3$5$',6(9$//(<$=
     
ƞƗĝǑċ
     

    Ăű£ĂűƐ
{{kš
XƐk{Ɛ„‰
a{Ɛ
)
&3'5(:(775$
 
[[[[
6: 5 21
   
)2 7,

{cƐ¼ƐX):
XƐ
%%)„„ 7 8&
12 75
 1 6

17+67
&2
  
3$5$',6(9$//(<$=

72/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* „F‰)ƐFc8ka
‰Fkc
   
3$5.,1*67$//6
  
1(7$5($6) $&5(6 )¬kcFc:
5($5 67%. *5266$5($6) $&5(6 ĞžžƣåƐüŇŹ
 
  ǑƆĝƞƗĝƞǑƞċ
   ĞžžƣåƐÚ±ƒå
¬kcFc:Ɛ)}ŽF)a)c‰„
/1'6&3 67%.
&855(17=21,1* 5(
CITY OF PHOENIX 352326('5(=21,1* &2
726,7(:$// 
3523(57< /,1( /27&29(5$*( 5(48,5('
352326('
6 ƒ ( NOV 08 2024 6)
  
6(7%$&.6 ck
5( 5( )5217  
Planning & Development 6,'(  
&21*5*$7,21%(7+,65$(/ (/,7(+2/',1*6//& 5($5  
„F‰)Ɛ{X
c 2)3+2(1,;$5,=21$ Department
  17+67 %8,/',1*+(,*+7  
)2& 72 &/     1257+ 17+67 3$5$',6(9$//(<$=
   3$5$',6(9$//(<$=
'
šFFcF‰¥Ɛa
{
a
‰)F
XƐX):)c%
(&$&7865'
0(&+3$1(/


*/$66 17+67 17+67

0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 6+($%/9'
352-(&7
  75$6/8&(17*/$663$1(/
/2&$7,21

67((/ 17$780%/9'
 /(9(/
  
9(1((50$7(5$/ '28%/(75((5$1&+5'


$5&+,7(&785$/&21&5(7(
 /(9(/)) kœc)

 6+($+2/',1*6//&
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* (*5((1:$<5'67(
6&2776'$/($=
 /2:(5/(9(/  

CITY OF PHOENIX %)„F:c
'5(:(77:25.6$5&+,7(&785(
(67(7621'568,7(
NOV 07 2024 6&2776'$/($=
œ)„‰  

    ƞ Planning & Development {kI)‰Ɛc

‰Fš)
  
Department 352326('352-(&7&216,6762)21(
6725<$1'21(6725<2)),&(%8,/',1*6
7+(,17(17,6723529,'($+,*+(1'0(',&$/
2)),&(:,7+/8;85<63$&(6$1'0$7(5,$/6

X):
XƐ%)„F{‰Fkc
0$;    $3257,212)&28175<&/8%$&5(6
 5(&25'(',1%22.3$*(2)7+(
 2)),&,$/5(&25'62)0$5,&23$&2817<
/2&$7(',16(&7,2172:16+,31257+
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 $1'5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1'6$/75,9(5
  %$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<
$5,=21$'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6

%(*,11,1*$77+(1257+:(67&251(52)
6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(6287+'(*5((6
 /(9(/ 0,187(66(&21'6($67$/21*7+(1257+
   9(57,&$/&+$1*(6,1/(9(/6 %(9(/('&+$1*(6,1/(9(/6 /,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$',67$1&(2)
)((77+(1&(6287+'(*5((60,187(6
:(67$',67$1&(2)¶ 727+(
6287+($67&251(52)/272)6$,'
 /(9(/)) &28175<&/8%$&5(67+(1&(1257+
 '(*5((60,187(66(&21'6:(67$
‰¥{ũƐ„F‰)Ɛœ
XXƐ%)‰
FX ',67$1&(2))((772$32,17217+(
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* :(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(1257+
$/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$
 /2:(5/(9(/

ƌ    ',67$1&(2))((7727+(32,172)
%(*,11,1*

'(6&5,%('3$5&(/&217$,1,1*$&5(6

)X)š
‰FkcƐck‰)„
)
„‰ 0$6215<&$3250257$5  0$*21(&2$7678&&2&203/,$1&(
352*5$0$//21(&2$7678&&2
    ċ 6<67(066+$//%($33/,('%<0)5
   $33529(',167$//(56$1$33529('
:($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(56+$//%(
$33/,('29(5$//)5$0,1*$1':22'
%$6('6+($7+,1*21(&2$7678&&2
678&&2),1,6+ 6<67(0 ,&&(65 7+,621(&2$7
678&&26<67(06+$//%($33/,('
29(5$:($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(5
+25,=217$/5(%$5:,7+,1 9$5,(6 &21)250,1*72,5&5
%/2&.&(// ,)$33/,&$%/(  3529,'(:($7+(5)/$6+,1*3522),1*
/2&$7('$7 +(,*+7 $7(;7(5,25:$//3(1(75$7,216
,1&/8',1*:,1'2:6'2256$1'
9(1763(55
5(,1)25&('&08:$//
 3$,17$//87,/,7$5,$10(7$/720$7&+
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 678&&2812
9(57,&$/5(%$5
   :((36&5(('72%(,167$//('3(5,5&
&(17(5(',1:$// 5
ŐǑċŁƆƐcƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰
),1,6+*5$'(  678&&23/$67(5),1,6+0$7(5,$/72
%(,167$//('3(5,5&5
(;7(5,25),1,6+6<67(07%' 
 /(9(/ 0,1 /$3
  



 /(9(/))

&21&5(7()227,1* {

%F„)Ɛš
XX)¥Ɛ
¬ƐíĂƞĂƗ
129(57,&$/
Ăƌ‰BƐ¼Ɛ„B)

3(5
'2:(/6:,7+
.,9$6'(93$3346




 /2:(5/(9(/
 $/7(51$7(%(1'6 6758&785$/


%)œ)‰‰ƐƐœkU„Ɛ
3(56758&785$/ åķ±ĞĮƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐ{X
c„Ä%)œ)‰‰œkU„ũka

ŤĚŇĻåƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐĂƐĝ ƗƐƆƐƗƐĝ ŁƐƗƐíƐí
ck‰B ƆƐŐƐċƐċƐƐ)ũƐƐ„‰)‰„kcƐƐ%Ɛũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũ„ŽF‰)ƐƐƞƐǑƐċ

    Ɨ ‰¥{ũƐ„F‰)Ɛœ
XXƐ%)‰
FX „ƐƐkƐ‰Ɛ‰Ɛ„Ɛ%Ɛ
ƐXƐ)ƐƐƐØƐƐ
Ɛ¬ƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐƞƐĂƐŐ
   œƐœƐœƐƐƐũƐƐƐ%ƐƐ)ƐœƐ)Ɛ‰Ɛ‰ƐœƐkƐƐUƐ„ƐƐƐũƐƐƐƐkƐa
Ă   
ƞƗĝǑċ

Ăű£ĂűƐ
{{kš
XƐk{Ɛ„‰
a{Ɛ
)

5 21
)2 7,

{cƐ¼ƐX):
XƐ
%%)„„ 7 8&
12 75
 1 6
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 
  &2
17+67
3$5$',6(9$//(<$=


 /(9(/
„F‰)ƐFc8ka
‰Fkc
  
1(7$5($6) $&5(6 )¬kcFc:
*5266$5($6) $&5(6 ĞžžƣåƐüŇŹ

ǑƆĝƞƗĝƞǑƞċ
ĞžžƣåƐÚ±ƒå
 /(9(/)) ¬kcFc:Ɛ)}ŽF)a)c‰„

&855(17=21,1* 5(
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* 352326('5(=21,1* &2

 /2:(5/(9(/ /27&29(5$*( 5(48,5('
 352326('
6)

6(7%$&.6 ck
)5217  
6,'(  
„kŽ‰B 5($5  

%8,/',1*+(,*+7  
    Ő    '
šFFcF‰¥Ɛa
{
a
‰)F
XƐX):)c%
(&$&7865'
0(&+3$1(/


*/$66 17+67 17+67

352-(&7 6+($%/9'
75$6/8&(17*/$663$1(/
/2&$7,21
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7
  67((/ 17$780%/9'


9(1((50$7(5$/ '28%/(75((5$1&+5'


$5&+,7(&785$/&21&5(7(
 /(9(/
kœc)
  
 6+($+2/',1*6//&
(*5((1:$<5'67(
6&2776'$/($=
 

%)„F:c
 /(9(/))
 '5(:(77:25.6$5&+,7(&785(
(67(7621'568,7(
6&2776'$/($=
 
)
„‰Ɛ)cX
:)%ƐŦck‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ {kI)‰Ɛc

‰Fš)
   
Ő    352326('352-(&7&216,6762)21(
6725<$1'21(6725<2)),&(%8,/',1*6
7+(,17(17,6723529,'($+,*+(1'0(',&$/
2)),&(:,7+/8;85<63$&(6$1'0$7(5,$/6

X):
XƐ%)„F{‰Fkc
$3257,212)&28175<&/8%$&5(6
5(&25'(',1%22.3$*(2)7+(
2)),&,$/5(&25'62)0$5,&23$&2817<
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 /2&$7(',16(&7,2172:16+,31257+
  $1'5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1'6$/75,9(5
%$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<
$5,=21$'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6

%(*,11,1*$77+(1257+:(67&251(52)
6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(6287+'(*5((6
0,187(66(&21'6($67$/21*7+(1257+
 /(9(/ /,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$',67$1&(2)
   )((77+(1&(6287+'(*5((60,187(6
:(67$',67$1&(2)¶ 727+(
6287+($67&251(52)/272)6$,'
&28175<&/8%$&5(67+(1&(1257+
'(*5((60,187(66(&21'6:(67$
',67$1&(2))((772$32,17217+(
 /(9(/)) :(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(1257+
 $/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$
',67$1&(2))((7727+(32,172)
%(*,11,1*

'(6&5,%('3$5&(/&217$,1,1*$&5(6


ck‰BƐ)cX
:)%ƐŦck‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ )X)š
‰FkcƐck‰)„
 0$*21(&2$7678&&2&203/,$1&(
    ƞ    352*5$0$//21(&2$7678&&2
6<67(066+$//%($33/,('%<0)5
$33529(',167$//(56$1$33529('
:($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(56+$//%(
$33/,('29(5$//)5$0,1*$1':22'
%$6('6+($7+,1*21(&2$7678&&2
6<67(0 ,&&(65 7+,621(&2$7
678&&26<67(06+$//%($33/,('
29(5$:($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(5
&21)250,1*72,5&5
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7  3529,'(:($7+(5)/$6+,1*3522),1*
  $7(;7(5,25:$//3(1(75$7,216
,1&/8',1*:,1'2:6'2256$1'
9(1763(55
 3$,17$//87,/,7$5,$10(7$/720$7&+
678&&2812
 :((36&5(('72%(,167$//('3(5,5&
5
ŐǑċŁƆƐcƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰
 /(9(/  678&&23/$67(5),1,6+0$7(5,$/72
   %(,167$//('3(5,5&5




 /(9(/))
 {

%F„)Ɛš
XX)¥Ɛ
¬ƐíĂƞĂƗ
Ăƌ‰BƐ¼Ɛ„B)

.,9$6'(93$3346




„kŽ‰BƐ)c
X:)%ƐŦck‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ %)œ)‰‰ƐƐœkU„Ɛ
åķ±ĞĮƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐ{X
c„Ä%)œ)‰‰œkU„ũka

ŤĚŇĻåƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐĂƐĝ ƗƐƆƐƗƐĝ ŁƐƗƐíƐí
   
Ɨ   
ƆƐŐƐċƐċƐƐ)ũƐƐ„‰)‰„kcƐƐ%Ɛũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũ„ŽF‰)ƐƐƞƐǑƐċ

„ƐƐkƐ‰Ɛ‰Ɛ„Ɛ%Ɛ
ƐXƐ)ƐƐƐØƐƐ
Ɛ¬ƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐƞƐĂƐŐ

œƐœƐœƐƐƐũƐƐƐ%ƐƐ)ƐœƐ)Ɛ‰Ɛ‰ƐœƐkƐƐUƐ„ƐƐƐũƐƐƐƐkƐa



0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7
  ƞƗĝǑċ

Ăű£ĂűƐ
{{kš
XƐk{Ɛ„‰
a{Ɛ
)

5 21
 /(9(/ )2 7,
 
{cƐ¼ƐX):
XƐ
%%)„„ 7 8&
 12 75
 1 6

17+67
&2
3$5$',6(9$//(<$=

 /(9(/)) „F‰)ƐFc8ka
‰Fkc

1(7$5($6) $&5(6 )¬kcFc:
*5266$5($6) $&5(6 ĞžžƣåƐüŇŹ

ǑƆĝƞƗĝƞǑƞċ
ĞžžƣåƐÚ±ƒå
¬kcFc:Ɛ)}ŽF)a)c‰„
œ)„‰Ɛ)cX
:)%ƐŦck‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ CITY OF PHOENIX &855(17=21,1* 5(
352326('5(=21,1* &2
    ċ    /27&29(5$*( 5(48,5('
NOV 07 2024 352326('
6)

Planning & Development 6(7%$&.6 ck
)5217  
6,'(  
Department 5($5  

%8,/',1*+(,*+7   '
šFFcF‰¥Ɛa
{
a
‰)F
XƐX):)c%
(&$&7865'
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7
  0(&+3$1(/


*/$66 17+67 17+67

352-(&7 6+($%/9'
75$6/8&(17*/$663$1(/
/2&$7,21
 /(9(/
  
67((/ 17$780%/9'


9(1((50$7(5$/ '28%/(75((5$1&+5'

 /(9(/)) $5&+,7(&785$/&21&5(7(
 kœc)
 6+($+2/',1*6//&
(*5((1:$<5'67(
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* 6&2776'$/($=
 
 /2:(5/(9(/ %)„F:c

'5(:(77:25.6$5&+,7(&785(
(67(7621'568,7(
6&2776'$/($=
)
„‰ƐƐ)cX
:)%ƐŦ„kŽ‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ  

{kI)‰Ɛc

‰Fš)
    Ő   
352326('352-(&7&216,6762)21(
6725<$1'21(6725<2)),&(%8,/',1*6
7+(,17(17,6723529,'($+,*+(1'0(',&$/
2)),&(:,7+/8;85<63$&(6$1'0$7(5,$/6


0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7
X):
XƐ%)„F{‰Fkc
 
$3257,212)&28175<&/8%$&5(6
5(&25'(',1%22.3$*(2)7+(
2)),&,$/5(&25'62)0$5,&23$&2817<
/2&$7(',16(&7,2172:16+,31257+
$1'5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1'6$/75,9(5
%$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<
$5,=21$'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6
 /(9(/
  
%(*,11,1*$77+(1257+:(67&251(52)
6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(6287+'(*5((6
0,187(66(&21'6($67$/21*7+(1257+
/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$',67$1&(2)
)((77+(1&(6287+'(*5((60,187(6
:(67$',67$1&(2)¶ 727+(
 /(9(/)) 6287+($67&251(52)/272)6$,'
 &28175<&/8%$&5(67+(1&(1257+
'(*5((60,187(66(&21'6:(67$
',67$1&(2))((772$32,17217+(
:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(1257+
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1*
$/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$
',67$1&(2))((7727+(32,172)
%(*,11,1*
 /2:(5/(9(/

'(6&5,%('3$5&(/&217$,1,1*$&5(6

)X)š
‰FkcƐck‰)„
 0$*21(&2$7678&&2&203/,$1&(
ck‰BƐƐ)cX
:)%ƐŦ„kŽ‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ 352*5$0$//21(&2$7678&&2
6<67(066+$//%($33/,('%<0)5
    ƞ $33529(',167$//(56$1$33529('
   :($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(56+$//%(
$33/,('29(5$//)5$0,1*$1':22'
%$6('6+($7+,1*21(&2$7678&&2
6<67(0 ,&&(65 7+,621(&2$7
678&&26<67(06+$//%($33/,('
29(5$:($7+(55(6,67,9(%$55,(5
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 &21)250,1*72,5&5
   3529,'(:($7+(5)/$6+,1*3522),1*
$7(;7(5,25:$//3(1(75$7,216
,1&/8',1*:,1'2:6'2256$1'
9(1763(55
 3$,17$//87,/,7$5,$10(7$/720$7&+
678&&2812
 :((36&5(('72%(,167$//('3(5,5&
 /(9(/ 5
ŐǑċŁƆƐcƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰
    678&&23/$67(5),1,6+0$7(5,$/72
%(,167$//('3(5,5&5




 /(9(/))




/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1*
{

%F„)Ɛš
XX)¥Ɛ
¬ƐíĂƞĂƗ
Ăƌ‰BƐ¼Ɛ„B)

.,9$6'(93$3346




 /2:(5/(9(/

%)œ)‰‰ƐƐœkU„Ɛ
åķ±ĞĮƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐ{X
c„Ä%)œ)‰‰œkU„ũka

ŤĚŇĻåƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐĂƐĝ ƗƐƆƐƗƐĝ ŁƐƗƐíƐí

„kŽ‰BƐƐ)cX
:)%ƐŦ„kŽ‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ ƆƐŐƐċƐċƐƐ)ũƐƐ„‰)‰„kcƐƐ%Ɛũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũ„ŽF‰)ƐƐƞƐǑƐċ

„ƐƐkƐ‰Ɛ‰Ɛ„Ɛ%Ɛ
ƐXƐ)ƐƐƐØƐƐ
Ɛ¬ƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐƞƐĂƐŐ

œƐœƐœƐƐƐũƐƐƐ%ƐƐ)ƐœƐ)Ɛ‰Ɛ‰ƐœƐkƐƐUƐ„ƐƐƐũƐƐƐƐkƐa
    Ɨ   

ƞƗĝǑċ
0$;%8,/'+(,*+7 0$;%8,/'+(,*+7
  Ăű£ĂűƐ
{{kš
XƐk{Ɛ„‰
a{Ɛ
)

5 21
)2 7,

{cƐ¼ƐX):
XƐ
%%)„„ 7 8&
12 75
 1 6

 /(9(/ 17+67
&2
   3$5$',6(9$//(<$=

„F‰)ƐFc8ka
‰Fkc
1(7$5($6) $&5(6 )¬kcFc:
*5266$5($6) $&5(6 ĞžžƣåƐüŇŹ
 /(9(/)) ǑƆĝƞƗĝƞǑƞċ
 ĞžžƣåƐÚ±ƒå
¬kcFc:Ɛ)}ŽF)a)c‰„
&855(17=21,1* 5(
/2:(5/(9(/3$5.,1* 352326('5(=21,1* &2
CITY OF PHOENIX
/27&29(5$*( 5(48,5('
 /2:(5/(9(/ 352326('
 6)
NOV 07 2024
6(7%$&.6 ck
)5217  
Planning & Development 6,'(  
œ)„‰Ɛ)cX
:)%ƐŦ„kŽ‰BƐŽFX%Fc:ŧ 5($5  
Department %8,/',1*+(,*+7  
   
ċ   
'
šFFcF‰¥Ɛa
{
(&$&7865'



17+67 17+67

352-(&7 6+($%/9'
/2&$7,21


17$780%/9'


'28%/(75((5$1&+5'


kœc)
 6+($+2/',1*6//&
(*5((1:$<5'67(
6&2776'$/($=
 

%)„F:c
'5(:(77:25.6$5&+,7(&785(
(67(7621'568,7(
6&2776'$/($=
 

{kI)‰Ɛc

‰Fš)
352326('352-(&7&216,6762)21(
6725<$1'21(6725<2)),&(%8,/',1*6
7+(,17(17,6723529,'($+,*+(1'0(',&$/
2)),&(:,7+/8;85<63$&(6$1'0$7(5,$/6

X):
XƐ%)„F{‰Fkc
$3257,212)&28175<&/8%$&5(6
5(&25'(',1%22.3$*(2)7+(
2)),&,$/5(&25'62)0$5,&23$&2817<
/2&$7(',16(&7,2172:16+,31257+
$1'5$1*(($672)7+(*,/$$1'6$/75,9(5
%$6($1'0(5,',$10$5,&23$&2817<
$5,=21$'(6&5,%('$6)2//2:6

%(*,11,1*$77+(1257+:(67&251(52)
6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(6287+'(*5((6
0,187(66(&21'6($67$/21*7+(1257+
/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$',67$1&(2)
)((77+(1&(6287+'(*5((60,187(6
:(67$',67$1&(2)¶ 727+(
6287+($67&251(52)/272)6$,'
&28175<&/8%$&5(67+(1&(1257+
'(*5((60,187(66(&21'6:(67$
',67$1&(2))((772$32,17217+(
:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,217+(1&(1257+
$/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'6(&7,21$
',67$1&(2))((7727+(32,172)
%(*,11,1*

'(6&5,%('3$5&(/&217$,1,1*$&5(6




ŐǑċŁƆƐcƐĂƌ‰BƐ„‰




{

%F„)Ɛš
XX)¥Ɛ
¬ƐíĂƞĂƗ
Ăƌ‰BƐ¼Ɛ„B)

.,9$6'(93$3346




%)œ)‰‰ƐƐœkU„Ɛ
åķ±ĞĮƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐ{X
c„Ä%)œ)‰‰œkU„ũka

ŤĚŇĻåƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐĂƐĝ ƗƐƆƐƗƐĝ ŁƐƗƐíƐí

ƆƐŐƐċƐċƐƐ)ũƐƐ„‰)‰„kcƐƐ%Ɛũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũ„ŽF‰)ƐƐƞƐǑƐċ

„ƐƐkƐ‰Ɛ‰Ɛ„Ɛ%Ɛ
ƐXƐ)ƐƐƐØƐƐ
Ɛ¬ƐũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũũƐíƐĂƐƞƐĂƐŐ

œƐœƐœƐƐƐũƐƐƐ%ƐƐ)ƐœƐ)Ɛ‰Ɛ‰ƐœƐkƐƐUƐ„ƐƐƐũƐƐƐƐkƐa




ƞƗĝǑċ


5 21
)2 7,

{cƐ¼ƐX):
XƐ
%%)„„ 7 8&
12 75
 1 6

17+67
&2
3$5$',6(9$//(<$=

„F‰)ƐFc8ka
‰Fkc
1(7$5($6) $&5(6 )¬kcFc:
CITY OF PHOENIX *5266$5($6) $&5(6 ĞžžƣåƐüŇŹ

ǑƆĝƞƗĝƞǑƞċ
ĞžžƣåƐÚ±ƒå
¬kcFc:Ɛ)}ŽF)a)c‰„
NOV 07 2024 &855(17=21,1* 5(
352326('5(=21,1* &2
Planning & Development /27&29(5$*( 5(48,5('
352326('
Department 6)

6(7%$&.6 ck
)5217  
6,'(  
5($5  

%8,/',1*+(,*+7   '
ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-119-24-2



Date of VPC Meeting December 2, 2024
Request From RE-43
Request To C-O/G-O
Proposal Office
Location Southeast corner of 56th Street and Shea Boulevard
VPC Recommendation No quorum
VPC Vote No quorum


VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

No quorum.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:

No quorum.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 183
ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
January 2, 2025

ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-119-24-2
Location: Southeast corner of 56th Street and Shea Boulevard
From: RE-43
To: C-O/G-O
Acreage: 2.59
Proposal: Office
Applicant: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Owner: Ronald Urman, 56 & Shea Holdings, LLC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 12/2/2024 No quorum.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff recommendation with two
additional stipulations.

Motion Discussion:

There was discussion amongst the commissioners regarding the appropriateness of including
two new additional stipulations, requested by the applicant, without a recommendation from the
Village Planning Committee and whether the case should be remanded back to the Village
Planning Committee.

Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Z-119-24-2, per the staff
recommendation, with two additional stipulations as follows:

1. The location(s) of any driveway accessing the property from 56th Street shall be per the
accepted Traffic Impact Analysis by the Street Transportation Department.

2. A traffic control device and signage shall be provided to discourage left-out turning
movements from the property on to 56th Street.

Maker: Matthews
Second: James
Vote: 6-2 (Busching, Jaramillo)
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. As stipulated, the proposal increases shade tree canopy coverage along public
sidewalks, bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways, and transit stops.

2. As stipulated, the proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses and zoning and
provides an increased buffer adjacent to single-family residential zoning.

3. As stipulated, the proposal supports efforts from various plans, policies, and initiatives,
including the Tree and Shade Master Plan, the Complete Streets Guiding Principles, the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, the Transportation Electrification Action Plan, the
Phoenix Climate Action Plan, and the Conservation Measures for New Development
policy.


Stipulations:

1. The elevations shall contain design elements of residential character, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

2. A minimum 20-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the north property
line, adjacent to Shea Boulevard, and shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper,
large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and
shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the
landscape area to achieve a minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

3. The west 25 feet of the property, measured from the west property line adjacent to 56th
Street, shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy, shade trees,
planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents, and
vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a
minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4. A minimum 10-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided along the south and east
property lines and shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy, shade
trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents, and
vegetative groundcovers evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a
minimum of 50% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. A minimum of 10% of surface parking areas (exclusive of required/stipulated landscape
setbacks) shall be landscaped. Surface parking areas shall achieve a minimum of 25%
shade with minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees, dispersed
throughout the landscape areas, as approved by Planning and Development
Department.

6. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

7. All bicycle parking, pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks), and transit stops shall be
shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum
of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. Bicycle parking shall be provided per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic
racks located near building entrances and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of
Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

9. A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

10. A minimum of 5% of the required vehicle parking spaces shall include Electric Vehicle
(EV) Installed Infrastructure and a minimum of 20% of the vehicle parking spaces within
the underground parking garage shall include EV Capable spaces, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

11. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater
management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This includes but is not limited
to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales, permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater
Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for
Alternative Stormwater Management.

12. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-
Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.

13. Natural turf shall only be utilized in required retention areas (bottom of basin, and only
allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf areas in common
areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

14. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and drip lines shall be utilized in any turf areas to
reduce water waste.

15. Landscaping shall be maintained by permanent and automatic/water efficient
WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers (or similar smart controller) to minimize
maintenance and irrigation water consumption for all on and offsite landscape irrigation.

16. Provide a landscape irrigation plan that includes zones to establish the amount of
irrigation to apply based on maturity and type of the landscaping. Irrigation should be
applied efficiently based on the maturity and need for the vegetation.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that demonstrates a
commitment to participate in the Phoenix Water Efficiency Checkup program for a
minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

18. The existing bus pad on eastbound Shea Boulevard, adjacent to the development, shall
be retained.

19. A minimum of 65 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the south
half of Shea Boulevard, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

20. The streetscape beginning at the back of curb along the south side of Shea Boulevard
on both sides of the sidewalk, adjacent to the development, shall be replenished with
minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted 20 feet on
center, or in equivalent groupings, and shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers
with a maximum mature height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape
area to achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

21. A minimum 6-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 8-foot-wide
landscape strip located between the back of curb and sidewalk shall be constructed on
the east side of 56th Street, adjacent to the development, planted to the following
standards and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet
on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature height
of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a
minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

22. An enhanced pedestrian connection shall be provided on the Shea Boulevard frontage
to allow for direct pedestrian access to the adjacent transit stop, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

23. All existing overhead utilities within the public right-of-way, adjacent to the development,
and on-site shall be undergrounded. The developer shall coordinate with all affected
utility companies for their review and permitting.

24. Unused driveways shall be replaced with sidewalk, curb and gutter. Also, any broken or
out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets shall be replaced and
all off-site improvements shall be upgraded to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

25. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

26. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius
of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office
to properly assess the materials.

27. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 waiver of
claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office
and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file for record.

28. THE LOCATION(S) OF ANY DRIVEWAY ACCESSING THE PROPERTY FROM 56TH
STREET SHALL BE PER THE ACCEPTED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.

29. A TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
DISCOURAGE LEFT-OUT TURNING MOVEMENTS FROM THE PROPERTY ON TO
56TH STREET.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




ATTACHMENT E

CITY OF PHOENIX
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

FORM TO REQUEST PC to CC
I HEREBY REQUEST THAT THE CC HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON: 2/5/2025

APPLICATION NO/ Z-119-24-2 (SIGNATURE ON ORIGINAL IN FILE)
LOCATION (Southeast corner opposition X applicant
of 56th Street and
Shea
Boulevard)

APPEALED FROM: PC 01/02/2025 10210 North 57th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85253

PC DATE STREET/ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
TO PC/CC CC 02/02/2025 Richard A. Pasquale
HEARING 480-699-5683
Littlepegasus1@gmail.com
CC DATE NAME / PHONE / EMAIL
REASON FOR REQUEST:

Seeking a single modest stipulation on signage, see attached.

RECEIVED BY: Camryn Thompson RECEIVED ON: 1/9/2025

Joshua Bednarek Camryn Thompson
Tricia Gomes Danny J. Inglese
Racelle Escolar GIS
Sarah Stockham Byron Easton (for PHO appeals only)
Adam Stranieri Village Planner
Stephanie Vasquez Applicant
Heather Klotz
Dalia Adams




REVISED 10/16/2024 vcm
ATTACHMENT F
CITY OF PHOENIX
NOV 26 2024
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
NOV 26 2024
Planning & Development
Department




CITY OF PHOENIX
NOV 26 2024
Planning & Development
Department




ATTACHMENT G

From: Carol Dries
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Cc: Carol Dries
Subject: Application No Z-119-24-2
Date: Sunday, November 24, 2024 3:00:35 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious   ‌


To Adrian Zambrano and the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee,
I do hereby protest strongly against the proposed rezoning application with the City of Phoenix
(Case No. Z-119-24-2) for the property at 56th Street and Shea.

We are current resident just 2 doors down from the proposed new project with the new
proposed zoning. I am also a full-time Realtor with Russ Lyon Sotheby’s International Realty
for the past 20 years.
There is absolutely NO QUESTION that the rezoning of this parcel and the project proposed
WILL SEVERELY HURT THE RESALE VALUE of the homes directly South of there, running along
side the whole 56th Street to Mountain View. This is especially true for the few homes that are
closest to the proposed project.

To allow the rezoning and the project to move forward would be a great injustice to us
homeowners who have bought in this area with the intent to live and see our homes appreciate
in value.
If you allow this rezoning and commercial building, then the future pricing appreciation of our
homes will stall. That is not just and fair your homeowner residents and our neighborhood and
community.
The project leaders comment that their proposed new building is already next to a church and
across the street from a school/synagogue, so it should not matter to anyone that the zoning
be changed from RE-43 to C-O.
However, they failed to point out that the entire adjoining rest of 56th Street going south is
RESIDENTIAL, and the zoning change would really matter to all of us.
I have spoken to my family and many, many of my neighbors, and we are ALL OPPOSED to the
proposed rezoning.

Please do not allow this parcel to be rezoned from RE-43 to C-O to accommodate the
development of a medical office!!! There are plenty of other commercial spaces and parcels
that would not necessitate the rezoning of RE-43.
This is my neighborhood and my home and I do NOT want a medical office 2 doors down from
me!


I cannot state this strongly enough!!

We vote NO to the rezoning and new development!
Carol and Charlie Dries

Carol Dries
REALTOR®

Russ Lyon Sotheby's International Realty
6900 E Camelback Road, Suite 110, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 [goo.gl]
(602) 618-6999 | carol.dries@russlyon.com | LinkedIn [linkedin.com] |
[russlyon.com] caroldries.com [caroldries.com]




From: ROBERT GEORGE
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: Case No. Z-119-24-2
Date: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 12:32:12 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


To Mr. Zambrano and the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee.
We are opposed to the rezoning for the property located at the Southwest Corner of
Shea Blvd. and 56th St., Phoenix (Case No. Z-119-24-2) for several reasons.

1. It will devalue our property for resale significantly according to my sources. All
properties south of Shea Blvd on 56th St except for the Jewish Synagogue are
residential thus affecting a significant number of properties currently zoned I believe
like Paradise Valley. One plus acre lots. We have lived here for 24 years and many
other residents on 56th St. have been here many years.

2. It will increase traffic on 56th Street as well as Shea Blvd. There are already a
number of accidents that occur at that intersection every year. The map provided by
the lawyers for the zoning change request indicate the entrance to the medical
building would be off of Shea Blvd east of the intersection. I am fairly certain cars
approaching from the east on Shea will make a U-turn at 56th St to get to the
entrance for the medical facility.

3. Why not use one of the vacated buildings on the north side of Shea Blvd. further to
the west of 56th St. For example, the Honorhealth facility at 50th St and Shea I
presume is vacant since they built the new Urgent Care and ER next to Mountainside
Fitness. The urgent care facility that was at Tatum and Shea near the Chase Bank
was vacated. Or how about the building where Whole Foods is vacating at Tatum and
Shea, which all have traffic signals and multiple lanes in each direction to handle
more traffic.
Please don't approve the rezoning request. Our neighborhood has already been
degraded by allowing Mountainside Fitness and the ER/UC facility to build on Shea. A
new medical facility will just make it worse and there are other options nearby.

Robert and Victoria George
10227 N 56th St, Paradise Valley




From: Doug Leventhal
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Cc: Racelle Escolar; Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Re: Z-119-24-2 Objection
Date: Monday, December 2, 2024 1:17:21 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


Hi Adrian,
I wanted to clarify one aspect of my letter of opposition that I'd like you to share
with the respective parties.
I am in no way speaking on behalf of Congregation Beth Israel or Scottsdale Country Day
School. My opposition to the project is solely as a resident of the community and the
neighborhood south of it. The views expressed are mine only and do not represent any views
of the Board of Directors of CBI or the school. I added the detail of my board seat solely to
illustrate my involvement in the community and proximity to the project.
Thank you,
Doug Leventhal

On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 9:04 AM Adrian G Zambrano
wrote:

Hi Doug,



Thank you for your email. I have saved it to the case file and have shared it with the
applicant and the Paradise Valley VPC.



Best regards,



Adrian Zambrano

Planner II - Village Planner

Phone: 602-534-6057

E-mail: adrian.zambrano@phoenix.gov

► Planning & Development Department



Planning Division, Long Range Planning

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor

Phoenix, AZ 85003


Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix




From: Doug Leventhal
Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2024 9:19 PM
To: Adrian G Zambrano ; Racelle Escolar

Cc: Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Z-119-24-2 Objection


Hello Adrian and Racelle, I am writing to express our objection to the proposed modification to the general plan amendment to allow a non-conforming commercial use on the currently residentially zoned and planned property. As a 21-year homeowner




Hello Adrian and Racelle,



I am writing to express our objection to the proposed modification to the general plan
amendment to allow a non-conforming commercial use on the currently residentially zoned
and planned property. As a 21-year homeowner in Singletree Ranch (to the south) and a
board member of Congregation Beth Israel (CBI) (immediately to the west) of this project, I
am concerned about the proposed use on a number of levels and would ask the commission
to recommend a denial of the proposed zone change. Those objections include traffic,
incompatibility of the proposed use and pedestrian and cyclist safety. I will address each of
these separately:



Traffic: The intersection of 56th St and Shea in its current design is most likely not
configured to handle an additional commercial use that requires 160+ parking spaces. I
would ask the applicant to produce a traffic study to demonstrate the on peak and off peak
impact this use will add to this intersection. As it currently stands, when parents are
dropping off students at both the Channen Preschool and Scottsdale Country Day School


(which operates out of CBI), northbound 56th Street traffic backs up to where all the cars
cannot proceed through the intersection on one cycle. The cars invariably will also stack up
past the proposed 56th Street curb cut entrance to the proposed project creating a conflict.



Keep in mind, all westbound and southbound traffic exiting the proposed project will have
to funnel on to 56th Street since a left-out turning movement onto Shea is prohibited from
the project's Shea curb cut due to the raised median (and proximity to the intersection).



Recommendation to Mitigate Traffic: We recommend that if this project is to proceed, to
mitigate the northbound and southbound 56th Street congestion created, that the project's
access to 56th Street is eliminated all-together and all traffic is directed to use the Shea Blvd
access.



Use: The use is directly in violation of the existing zoning and General Plan. While a
General Plan amendment is not required because the property is under 10 acres, that doesn't
discredit or diminish the fact that a 2-story medical office building is inconsistent with the
neighboring churches, schools and residences. We object to the proposed zone change
because the use itself is not currently approved or allowed without this zoning action and
would incorporate an incompatible use to the surrounding area. 56th Street is a quiet street
that ends at Mountain View to the South (then heads east to Invergordon). This use does not
contribute anything to the immediate and surrounding neighborhoods, nor bring amenities or
add any value. While it's not the purview of the City process to restrict uses within
permitted zones, it is in the purview to take actions that are consistent with the voter
approved General Plan and uphold the existing residential zoning on this property.



Recommendation to Mitigate Use: We assume there is no control over what specific uses
go into the medical office subject to C-O, but would propose a condition of approval
prohibiting pain management clinics from the development due to concerns about the
proximity to children in the school at CBI as well as the students of Scottsdale Country Day
school which uses the CBI facility and the playground immediately south of the subject
property.



Pedestrian & Cyclist Safety: 56th Street is a relatively quiet residential street used daily by
many cyclist groups and pedestrian walkers and joggers. There is no dedicated bicycle lane
on 56th street south of Shea like the one that exists immediately north of Shea, so the
cyclists and joggers share the road with vehicular traffic. Congestion of the two builds at the
crosswalk with the peak times of school and CBI functions. Adding more traffic to the
intersection as a result of this use will create additional opportunities for conflict between
those users, particularly the cyclists who do not, and cannot, use the sidewalk. Additionally,
children cross 56th Street from CBI, Channen and the Scottsdale Country Day to go to the
school's playground across the street. The additional traffic generated should not be


dismissed as an additional traffic risk for visitors not expecting the medical offices to be
situated in a neighborhood setting. Again, eliminating the 56th Street access would alleviate
this concern.



This proposed use is incompatible to the surrounding neighborhood (and existing General
Plan and Zoning). It conflicts with existing community uses, creates an additional vehicular
strain on the intersection, creates a potential conflict with the adjacent school's playground
and compounds to an already unsafe condition for cyclists. Therefore, we respectfully
request that the recommendation of the Village Planning Committee be to deny this zone
change. Barring that recommendation, we request the Committee make the
recommendations mentioned above.



Respectfully submitted,



Doug (and Stephanie) Leventhal

10021 N 55th Place




Racelle Escolar

From: Anay Kapadia
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 9:37 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: ITEM#7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Hello,

This email is being sent as I have great concerns about the massive medical office complex to be built at this
location of 56th street and Shea Blvd.

The ingress on 56th street is only one lane, there is a busy school and religious church right across the street
which already causes traffic issues in the morning and evening during busy hours. There are toddlers with
their teachers and classes that cross the street to play right next door to this project!

Now with medical offices there, this intersection south ON 56 th street is too small and I am VERY VERY
CONCERNED about this with the added traffic!

I live at the end of 56th street and there are constantly speeding cars up and down my street! I have kids that
ride their bikes like my neighbors, and I feel it would be WRONG to approve such a big complex as it currently
is planned. Besides the intersection in front of the subject property, it will increase speeding cars on my
street as well.

At the current size of the complex, this is just too many cars coming in and out and on my street and I feel this
is a safety hazard for my kids, THE KIDS THAT CROSS THE STREET AND PLAY ON THE FIELD NEXT TO THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION, and my respected neighbors whom also live here.

Please take my neighbors and mine objections seriously and scale down the size of this medical complex due
to series traffic concerns.

I approve this email and OBJECT TO THE CURRENT PLAN AS ITS CURRENT SIZE.

Anay B. Kapadia
9809 N 56th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85253
847-975-2057.


Racelle Escolar

From: azinv@aol.com
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 1:55 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Shea Blvd and 56th Street Planned Medical Building




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To the Planning Commission

I am a resident in Astoria, a 10 home subdivision, located immediately south of the project. Because
of current traffic backups, Astoria already gets quite a few cars that speed thru our tiny U-shaped
subdivision trying to get back to Shea. These frustrated drivers are searching for short cuts thru the
neighborhood trying to get around the lengthy backups on Shea. With a large project at the
intersection as proposed, the back up of cars on 56th street will ruin this residential neighborhood.
Since Mountainside Fitness opened, I'm frequently unable to make a left turn (heading west) onto
Shea because the traffic is baked up as far as the eye can see.
In addition, the parents that have children at Temple Beth that make multiple trips back and forth
everyday will be negatively impacted.
Please reconsider the size and scope of this project. It should be scaled back.

Respectfully,
Louis Chacopulos
5535 E. Beryl Ave
Paradise Valley 85253




From: Matthew Karlovsky, M.D., F.A.C.S.
To: PDD Long Range Planning
Subject: Shea and 56th rezoning
Date: Sunday, December 29, 2024 10:38:42 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


Adrian and Racelle,

I live on 57th St south of Shea Blvd and was just made aware today of the rezoning attempt at
Shea/56th St, Z-119-24-2 by a neighbor. I reviewed Adrian's report from Nov 22, 2024 about
the proposed massive office building complex. We who live in this neighborhood did not
receive any notices about this project.

If you recall, there was an organized neighborhood campaign against the rezoning of the
corner property at 57th and Shea two years ago proposed by Regal American and despite
fierce objection by hundreds of neighbors, the rezoning was pushed through by Regal's firm
Whitney Morris. This large complex is now under construction. In real life now the building is
large, overbearing and does not fit the appearance of the neighborhood and negatively impacts
the landscape and will create a traffic danger. All these concerns were ignored and the
projected was approved by the city.

The new Urgent Care which is located at 52nd street and Shea has very severely impacted
traffic congestion along Shea even during non-rush hour times these past 2 years. Since extra
traffic signals were erected on Shea to assist the Urgent Care, westbound traffic now backs up
from 56th/Shea all the way back to N. 61th Place, and east bound traffic backs up halfway to
Tatum Blvd, beginning at 2pm now. It takes 3-4 cycles of the lights to get through the
intersection of Shea/56th now. The Urgent Care alone has very badly impacted the traffic
along Shea for all the hundreds of residents within 1 mile each way along Shea.

Now comes this brand-new proposal at 56th and Shea of a 2-story office complex by Ronny
Urman, a colleague of Regal American's owner, with an underground garage and surface
garage for a total of 136 parking spaces. This is maddening and will undoubtedly further
negatively impact traffic, during peak and off peak. This type of office complex is not meant
to be in Paradise Valley. Traffic congestion will be severe.

All the proposed verbiage about bike paths, tree conservation, zero waste, climate action is the
typical blather used by Whitney Morris to plump up the application to make it appear
thoughtful and that it would somehow benefit the community by making it "fit in" to the
landscape. This can't be further from the truth.

I invite you to stand on the corner of 56th St and Shea at 3pm and observe the traffic for 30
minutes. There is no place for this new proposal.



Please do not approve this.

Sincerely,

Matthew E. Karlovsky, M.D., F.A.C.S.




----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Adrian G Zambrano
To: Matthew Karlovsky, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 at 07:34:42 AM GMT+2
Subject: Automatic reply: Shea and 56th rezoning


Hello,



City offices will close at 12:00 PM on December 24 in observance of the Christmas Eve holiday and will
be closed on December 25 and January 1 in ovbservance of the Christmas Day holiday and New Year's
Day holiday. I will be out of office until Friday, January 3 and will return to office on Monday, January 6. If
you need immediate assistance, please email pdd.longrange@phoenix.gov. Otherwise, I will respond to
your email upon my return on Monday, January 6.



Thank you,

Adrian Zambrano, Planner II - Village Planner


Planning and Development Department

Planning Division, Long Range Planning




Racelle Escolar

From: Tassie Phifer
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 12:54 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Item #7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To whom it may concern,

My grandparents bought a property on 56th Street just south of Shea in the 1970's and it has remained in
our family since then. We love this neighborhood and have enjoyed what my grandfather called,
"Peaceful Street" for the last forty years. We were just informed that you are considering adding a
medical complex to a residential area and are shocked that you would steal from a peaceful residential
neighborhood by congesting our street with commercial traffic. In addition, we have watched traffic on
Shea become more and more unmanageable with the new light at Mountainside Fitness. Driving on Shea
in the evening is an absolute mess and this new build would exacerbate an already stressful traffic area.

We absolutely oppose this proposed building in our residential neighborhood.

Thank you,
Tasmyn Phifer




Racelle Escolar

From: Aimee Goldstein
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:13 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition to item #7, X-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Proposed project is too large and would create too much commercial traffic in a residential area. Please
scale back this project to a more appropriate size.

Thank you, resident at 10228 N. 58th St., Phoenix, AZ, 85253


Aimee Goldstein, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
11811 North Tatum Blvd, Ste 3031
Phoenix, AZ 85028
480-278-2953




Racelle Escolar

From: Robert Zimmerman
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 12:51 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Item #7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this email.

Report Suspicious


To whom it may concern –

I wish to air my concerns about the abovementioned proposed project on Shea and 56th street. I have reviewed the
rezoning packed and familiarized myself with the proposed project.

I live at 10209 N. 56th Steet (5 parcels south of the proposed project) and have been there since January 2020. I am
intimately familiar with the community and tra ic patterns on this street.

I do not see a tra ic assessment in the rezoning packet and wonder how this could get to a Final Approval stage of
the Planning Committee without one. With the addition of the Honor Health project, along with the existing
Mountainside Fitness, and the home builder development you recently approved on 57 th and Shea, the congestion
on Shea from 64th Street (to the East) and almost Tatum (to the West) has been significant. Now, to add another
high-volume project to that mile plus zone seems unmanageable.

On 56th Street, you already have the Congregation Beth Isreal that has school pick up and drop o , along with
several events, that put strain on the coming and going from Shea on 56th Street. Now, immediately across from
the temple, we are considering a project that would possibly quadruple the current volume of vehicles on this
residential street.

I pose some serious hazards that this project would cause on 56 th street, so close to Shea Blvd.:

 I am concerned about the e ect that the tra ic on Shea, heading east and turning south onto 56th will back
up with cars trying to access the residential neighborhood, drop/pick up children o at the temple’s
school, and those trying to immediately make a left turn (once on 56th) to pull into the proposed projects
entrance. This is further exaggerated by residents, temple cars and cars exiting the proposed project all
stopped at the light at Shea and 56th, further making it even more di icult for through tra ic, while cars may
be backed up for those waiting to be able to access the proposed project via the previously described left
turn. By the way, during drop o and pick up the Temple has the 15 mph signs out which will also clearly
cause further back up. Also, they have a North access that they keep gated/blocked o , I assume because
the proximity to Shea causes too much congestion if they use that as an access. Was there ever study
done on this?

 I am concerned about the (likely) 12-15 month construction of the proposed project and the e ect on 56th
street. I have watched the home builder project that was previously approved on 57 th street and how that
construction is a ecting that street. Several cars, trucks and mobile construction equipment on that
street is disrupting the coming and going. That project wont even have car access to 57 th street but it is still
a mess. This proposed project is significantly larger and proposed access to 56 th and will be causing
congestion right at a significant streetlight.

 I am concerned about the e ect this higher tra ic volume will have on the tra ic partially caused by the
security the Congregation has on sight. Congregation Beth Isreal currently has at least two armed security
guards directing tra ic into and out of their parking lot every day. I see that they aren’t just directing tra ic
but are surveying cars attempting to enter the parking lot. I am completely in favor of the precautions that
the Congregation takes for its security and how this provides additional (indirect) security for the entire
community, so I would not want their process strained in any way. Their security process takes time, and a
significantly higher volume of vehicles on 56th street would strain this process.

 Lastly, I am probably most concerned about the children and security at the Congregation’s school. The
children cross 56th street multiple times per day to access their playground. The significant additional
tra ic on 56th caused by this proposed project will exponentially increase the danger to these children both
during the construction phase, and when the project is up and running. Cars pulling out of the proposed
project’s 56th street access, finding that the streetlight is all backed up (as already stated) will look to turn
left (south) in to the residential neighborhood for another route. This puts them immediately into a 15 mph
zone, and/or a security o icer (privately hired by the Temple) trying to safely walk students/children across
this NOW very busy street.

I sincerely hope you will take these comments seriously. I am all for progress, but this project poses significant
challenges for the Congregation, and the community that already reside there.

Please let me know if you have any questions.


Bob Zimmerman




This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately by return email and delete this communication and destroy all copies. Please note, any request to bind coverage, modify coverage or report a claim is
not valid until you receive confirmation from Heffernan Insurance Brokers that we have processed your request.




Racelle Escolar

From: Charles Ferguson
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 10:11 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Charles Ferguson; My Love
Subject: RE: #7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Dear Planning Commission or whom it may concern.

We are 12 year residents of Phoenix and when we moved to this home approximately 2 years go we
specifically picked this location to raise our children due to the residential nature of the
neighborhood. We researched the zoning and saw that this site (item #7) in particular was zoned single-
family residential which would prohibit commercial development since any commercial development
would change the character of our immediate neighborhood. We also prided ourselves and shared with
friends that unlike other local municipalities the City of Phoenix is very well governed and resident's
concerns are addressed appropriately.

We became aware of this large commercial development 3 homes away from our home and the change
in zoning from single-family to high-density commercial and we are of course very concerned and
surprised.

This will be detrimental to the residential nature of our street where our kids and other neighborhood
children play. As the Commission may be aware, traffic backups on Shea are very frequent and guests of
this facility will not only use the street on which we reside but also cut down residential side roads in
order to access the facility in high-traffic times. These cut thru drivers and other visitors will not be aware
of the residential child friendly area and will increase the harm and risk to our children and others. There
is a church, a school and single-family homes on this street. How could one justify the dramatic change
in use but only for profit without regard for impact to the nature and safety of the immediate area. This is
a non-confirming change in use.

This application also significantly impacts our enjoyment of the neighborhood with increased traffic,
illuminated signage, two-story steel buildings, asphalt parking areas, transient commercial visitors and a
change from residential in nature to a commercial district with this one, new non-conforming use. This
problem of zoning is self-created by the developer where ample profit could be made to develop as
single-family residential as zoning currently allows where just like our home, where we have 30 and 40 ft
set backs, ample grading and drainage, a maximum lot density the fraction of what is proposed and most
importantly doesn't change the nature and character of the neibhorhood.


Please deny this application due to its detrimental impact on our immediate community.

Thank you, Charles

--
Charles Ferguson
10201 N. 56th Street
847.687.1341





Racelle Escolar

From: JOYCE COLLEY
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:28 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Item #7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


IT WAS BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION, TODAY DEC 31, 2024, THAT A MEDICAL COMPLEX BLDG WILL BE
BUILT ON 56TH ST AND SHEA. WE OPPOSE THIS BUILDING AS TRAFFIC IS ALREADY HORRIBLE IN OUR
AREA. IT IS ALREADY A 2 MILE BACKUP GOING WEST FROM 64THST AND THIS NEW BUILDING AND ALL
ITS PARKING WILL BE UNBELIEVABLE. IT WILL CAUSE MORE CARS GOING THRU OUR
NEIGHBORHOODS AND MORE TRAFFIC ON SHEA WITH MORE ACCIDENTS DAILY. PLEASE REVIEW
THIS PROPOSAL AND MAKE THE CORRECT CHOICES. WOULD YOU WANT THIS IN YOUR
NEIGHBORHOOD??? THERE ARE SO MANY EMPTY BUILDINGS ALREADY, WHY CAN’T THEY USE THEM .

DAVID AND JOYCE COLLEY
10210 N. 58TH ST
P.V., AZ 85253




Racelle Escolar

From: ualwhite@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 1:01 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Planning commission #7-Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Email - pdd.planningcomm@phoenix.gov Subject: Planning Commission, #7 - Z-119-24-2


I live at 56th and Cholla and since Mountainside Fitness and HonorHealth built their facilities, it can
take an extra 15 to 20 minutes in stop and go traffic just to get to 56th street to get home. Under no
circumstances should there be another huge facility built in this area. Thank you.
Deborah White, MD
11448 N 54th Place





Racelle Escolar

From: Jay Snyder
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 5:59 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Jay Snyder
Subject: Item7,Z-119-24-2 rezone




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this email.

Report Suspicious




Dear Phoenix Commission Members

For the last 30 years, my wife and I have lived at 9591 N 56th Street 3 houses south of the proposed rezoning
application. Our neighborhood is just South of Mountain View.

I object strongly to the request for a large medical office building on Shea and 56th Steet for the following reasons :

1. Traffic issues This rezoning will create terrible traffic issues on 56 Street. Cars already use 56 st and Shea to go
south to Mountain View RD to avoid Shea . We have had several accidents at the left turn on 56 st and MTN
View. Further, before the home was built on our Cul de sac there were 3 accidents, one involving a roll over
and serious injury. South of Mountain View there are only 3 homes on each side of the street. Since drivers
cannot see it is a dead end they travel through at a high rate of speed only to make a quick turn, in frustration
and speed back towards Mountain View.

2. Schools The land is across the street from the proposed site has an elementary school.

3. Paradise Valley residential community. This development will disturb the residential neighborhood less than a
mile south.

4. Traffic study been completed?

Jay G. Snyder
Snyder Nationwide Real Estate
8141 E. Indian Bend Road Suite 107
Scottsdale, AZ 85250
Jay@brokerhotel.com
480-344-7500 Office
602-418-0282 Mobile




Racelle Escolar

From: Kathy Ketter
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 2:57 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Plan for Medical Complex at 56th St & Shea




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To Whom It May Concern,

We strongly object to the approval of a 35,000 sq ft Medical Complex being built on the corner of Shea
and 56th Street. We especially have concerns about the proposed size of the complex which includes 90
surface parking spots plus a parking garage. We also strongly object to having ingress/egress on 56th
Street in part or in total.

The fairly recent developments along Shea including the Honor Health Urgent Care and Mountain Fitness
Gym on Shea along with the already established Beth Tefillah Synagogue/School on 56th and Shea have
greatly impacted traffic frequently in this area, causing long back-ups. The commercial building that is
currently under construction on 60th and Shea will only add to that problem. We don't need yet another
large commercial development in the area. This development ignores the quiet residential nature of 56th
Street and the surrounding neighborhoods.

Sincerely,

Ken and Kathy Ketter
9501 N 56th Street
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253




Racelle Escolar

From: Lissa Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 9:48 PM
To: Racelle Escolar; Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: Shea and 56th Rezoning




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Dear Adrian and Racelle -

My name is Lissa Erickson. I and my family live at 10020 N. 58th Street and were active participants in
the attempt to deter the recent rezoning of the property at 57th and Shea, two years ago, when the
property was rezoned for RO usage against our community's wishes. We are now hearing - only from a
neighborhood flyer; never via any communication from the zoning applicant or the city - that, on top of
last year's decision to allow a non-residential (RO) structure for the first time in the Country Club Acre
community, there is now a current request suddenly being heard by the Planning Commission to create a
large, commercial medical complex at the corner of 56th and Shea, with no prior review by the Paradise
Valley Village planning committee; thus blocking any opportunity for the residents most affected by this
decision to communicate their extreme desire to keep our residential community intact, in the manner it
was intended: as a quiet, upscale single-dwelling residential community on 1+ acre plots of land.

At the time of the prior rezoning at 57th and Shea, as you each know, the direct neighborhood community
contiguous to that project - and this new project - were completely opposed to the project; and
expressed concerns at that time that the 57th Street rezoning would jump-start a precedence for other
commercial entities to make inroads into our community. We were assured by the PV
Planning Committee, and the Council, at that time that the RO rezoning would in no way threaten future
zoning issues in a manner that would detract from Country Club Acres. And yet here we are, no more
than a year and a half later, with a zoning request in hand to build a commercial, large-scale edifice right
in the midst of our community. It is hard to believe that the good intentions articulated two years ago by
your Council, were expressed in actual good faith; particularly with the jump over the standard
procedures requiring notification of the surrounding community; the lack of review by the PV Planning
Committee; and sufficient time and careful review of such a complete change to the nature of our
neighborhood. We have been given no notice, no voice, and no consideration for this massively
detrimental zoning request.

I request that this application be sent back down to the PV Council for a proper, and hopefully objective,
review of this new request and the horrific effect it would have on our community and the traffic patterns
on Shea Boulevard and our neighborhood streets. There is no excuse for this situation to be occurring
without any consideration given to the impact to those of us who live here, and love this community.

Please reconsider next steps for this application. What is happening in this instance is a travesty of the
procedures established for zoning requests. Please fix the process for this application, before
something occurs that would be exceedingly destructive to our families; and the greater Scottsdale
community.

Thank you in advance for your consideration,

Lissa Erickson
480-326-0993




Racelle Escolar

From: Lynn Schepp AZHomes4ACause.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 11:17 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Planning Commission, #7 - Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Planning of a massive medical office complex for the southeast corner of 56th St and Shea Blvd. (The
former athletic field for Temple Beth Israel)
UNACCETAB:E WITH BACK UP TRAFFICE ON SHEA BLVD ALREADY


200 vehicle trips per hour
UNACCEPTABLE AIR QUALITY AND NOISE
worsen an already horrible situation. • With the traffic back-ups on Shea,
undoubtedly meander through the neighborhood residential streets to reach Doubletree Ranch Rd as an
alternate westerly street.
This massive development is an unreasonable level increased intensity and ignores the residential
nature of 56th Street and the greater neighborhood.


With a lack of quorum, Phoenix' Paradise Valley Village planning committee on Dec 2, so this request will
skip that step and go to directly to the Planning Commission on Jan 2 for final approval WITHOUT
QUORUM Makes for a Board Rules Regulation VIOLATION


We need to scale this back due to traffic, air quality, safety, infrastructure of streets, sewer and septic
tank concerns for the few homes that still cannot connect to sewer due to outside scope of measured
feet away from street


Lynn Peterfreund




Racelle Escolar

From: Lynn S
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 11:20 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Planning Commission, #7 - Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Planning of a massive medical office complex for the southeast corner of 56th St and Shea Blvd. (The former
athletic field for Temple Beth Israel)
UNACCETAB:E WITH BACK UP TRAFFICE ON SHEA BLVD ALREADY


200 vehicle trips per hour
UNACCEPTABLE AIR QUALITY AND NOISE
worsen an already horrible situation. • With the traffic back-ups on Shea,
undoubtedly meander through the neighborhood residential streets to reach Doubletree Ranch Rd as an
alternate westerly street.
This massive development is an unreasonable level increased intensity and ignores the residential nature of
56th Street and the greater neighborhood.


With a lack of quorum, Phoenix' Paradise Valley Village planning committee on Dec 2, so this request will skip
that step and go to directly to the Planning Commission on Jan 2 for final approval WITHOUT QUORUM Makes
for a Board Rules Regulation VIOLATION


We need to scale this back due to traffic, air quality, safety, infrastructure of streets, sewer and septic tank
concerns for the few homes that still cannot connect to sewer due to outside scope of measured feet away
from street


Lynn Peters





Racelle Escolar

From: go2prescott@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 2:44 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Proposed medical complex 56th St and Shea




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


We object to co side ration and approval of a new 35,000sf Medical office building and garage on the SE
corner of 56th St and Shea.

Since the opening of the Mountainside Forness and Honor Health offices, and the new traffic light, along
with the new left turn signals at 56th St., traffic has become a nightmare. The backup, especially during
rush hours, and too long times for the light changes, has caused enormous inconveniences for local
residents and those traveling on Shea.
The school on 56th has already caused an increase of vehicles in our neighborhood.

If you allow this medical office building to go forward, we can count on patients, staff and visitors using
south 56th St to Mountain View as a conduit, increasing traffic on our street multi-fold with as many as
100 vehicles per hour based on the number of parking slots proposed and the relatively short “stay”
periods. 56th St and Mountain View are already used as a traffic cut-thru with both cars and commercial
vehicles Speeding down our streets.
The last thing we need is dozens more! At the least, restrict left hand turns out of the complex onto 56th
St

Please vote no on approval of this project. Save our neighborhood from more commercial traffic

Michael and Ellen Allen




Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS [apps.apple.com]





Racelle Escolar

From: Michele Adler Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:22 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Concern over scale of project on 56th/shea




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To whom it may concern,

We are residents of this community in Paradise Valley and the proposed massive medical office building
is of great concern to our community. This project will create terrible conditions for traffic in our
community which already suffers from approval of massive projects in this area. Enough is enough! It's
time that city leaders do due dilligence with planning in order to preserve the residential nature of 56th
Street and the greater neighborhood.

Drs. Michele and Yaneav Cohen




Racelle Escolar

From: M A
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 4:40 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Vote NO -- Item #7, Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


Dear Planning Commission,


Reference Item #7, Z-119-24-2

I am sending this email to you as a single-family property owner who is literally just a few doors down
from the massive 35,000 square foot medical office facility with 90 surface parking spaces plus parking
garage that is proposed for the southeast corner of Shea Blvd. and North 56th Street. I bought my
property at 10019 N 56th Street in December 2019 thinking that I was moving into a residential
neighborhood. Traffic was low volume, there was a church down the street with polite drivers, and school
age children walked across the street full of energy, laughter and fun to play at recess.

Since then, the City of Phoenix Planning Commission has done nothing to preserve this neighborhood
but instead only promote it as a commercial mecca. To wit:

 Now, there are several assisted living homes on both 56th street and 57th street that have
increased neighborhood traffic. All of the cars from caretakers and those who visit these assisted
living residences funnel north on 56th Street past my home to turn left at the Shea Blvd. stop light.
 On top of that, the Planning Commission approved the enormous Mountainside Fitness facility
which has caused significantly more cars on Shea including those coming up 56th Street by my
home as well as a significant increase in accidents at the Shea Blvd. & 56th Street intersection -
so much so that the traffic lights at that interchange had to be expanded and the Shea Blvd. turn
lane reconfigured..
 Then, the Planning Commission approved tearing down La Camarilla tennis and sport facility to
replace it with --- a "small" hospital. This has caused so much traffic that a new stoplight had to
be installed at 52nd Street and Shea Blvd. This additional stoplight and the massive increase in
traffic on Shea causes traffic to backup more than a mile from Tatum during typical Monday-
Fridays (and well past 56th Street to the east).
 The additional cycle time of the remodeled stop light at Shea Blvd and 56th Street now causes
additional speeding as drivers do not want to "be caught" at the light and wait the extra time.
 With the significantly more traffic on Shea, many more drivers now take the neighborhood roads
to avoid it and drive easily 65mph by my home at all times of the day.

So much for my low traffic nice family and children oriented neighborhood. I find garbage that has been
thrown out of passing car windows nearly every day in front of my home now. Ask yourself if you want
cars driving 65 mph down your street. Do you want your children or grandchildren playing where cars
drive 65 mph by your house? Do you think that improves or declines property values?

My current situation is directly your fault, but you can take a stand now to stop this continued
commercial advancement into residential neighborhoods and the excessive traffic that is causing harm
to many in these neighborhoods. There is NO need to approve this request. As there were before you
approved the new Honor Health hospital where La Camarilla was on Shea Blvd., there are still (and even
more since then) available commercial spaces available very close by that are already in heavy traffic
managed areas and locations already with more than ample parking for this size facility. At the Tatum
and Shea intersection alone, the Northeast corner main tenant is still empty since Albertson's closed
that store. There is also still a significant empty space where Bed Bath and Beyond vacated. In addition,
on the Northwest corner, a large space sits empty since Whole Foods moved out. In addition, the new PV
development where Whole Foods moved to has a huge area for developing new builds as well as an
enormous amount of land for parking. There is just no reason to force this request into a neighborhood.

Lastly, outside of the obvious safety concern caused by having a two story development looking directly
down on an adjacent children's playground, safety of our children should be paramount when we make
decisions that will impact their daily lives. Given the speed at which cars pass my house today, I cannot
imagine what the impact of adding 200 vehicle trips per hour within just feet of where the children cross
56th Street each day will be - and this is only a minimum based on only half of the planned 90 surface
spaces plus parking garage spaces being occupied on an average every 30 minutes. Would you feel this
was a safe situation for your child or grandchild?

As a twenty-five year resident of Phoenix who loves our space, I strongly implore you to reject Item #7, Z-
119-24-2. Literally, there is already the new "small" hospital across the street to provide medical care
and numerous others in the immediate vicinity. There are sensible solutions for placement of a new
medical facility, but the Southeast corner of Shea Blvd and 56th Street is not one. Especially given the
many real estate options immediately available to the requesting party in very close proximity, the
significant additional complications this will cause to traffic at this intersection and throughout my
neighborhood's streets, and the increase in lack of safety for children, I urge you to deliver a message
that shows you value Phoenix taxpaying homeowners, Phoenix neighborhoods, and all Phoenix children.
Tell the requesting party to come back with an alternate solution that meets pro-Phoenix criteria.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Monica Brooks
10019 N. 56th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85253




Racelle Escolar

From: Pamela Weyers
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:37 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: #7,Z-119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To whom it may concern,

I am very concerned about the proposed building at the SE corner of 56 th Street and Shea.

I am a resident down the street from this site. I understand the owner of the property has the right to
develop the land, however I do not believe the zoning should be changed from residential to commercial
for the following reasons:

 Having a large-scale commercial project on this corner will not preserve the character of my
residential community.
 The traffic created by such a project has the potential to make our residential streets more of a
through-fare. My small community in a particular could become a convenient turn-around area,
meaning more traffic and making it unsafe for the children who play in their front yards and ride
their bikes in the street in front of their houses.
 The current traffic lights already feel over-burdened with traffic. The addition of more cars turning
off Shea, or even worse turning onto or off of 56th Street to access a commercial driveway, would
overwhelm our corner. Should the project be approved regardless of our community request, I
strongly request that the only entrance and exit to the property be on Shea Blvd and not on
56th Street. This change would potentially lessen the traffic down 56 th Street.
 Additional traffic right next to a school is unwanted.


I appreciate your attention to my concerns. I hope you take into consideration that this is a residential
community and that a commercial building detracts from the sanctity of our homes and community.

Pamela Weyers
5539 E Beryl Ave.
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253
602-989-9449



Racelle Escolar

From: Patrick van den Bossche
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:59 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Proposed rezoning corner 56th Street & Shea (file # 17-5496)

Importance: High




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


We live at 9640 N. 57th Street not far from the site that is being proposed for the rezoning. We have
a concern about the additional traffic load that this project will cause in our quadrant and we would
like to see this project scaled back and not amplify what is already a growing traffic problem in the
56th Street and Shea corridor. We are also concerned that the additional traffic will pose safety
issues with the nearby school and the children that attend there.

Thank you for considering our concern and thank for considering scaling back this project.

Best Regards,

Patrick and Denise van den Bossche
M 602.821.0737
E pvdbossche@me.com





Racelle Escolar

From: Quinn.Williams@gtlaw.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 2:52 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Quinn.Williams@gtlaw.com
Subject: FW: Item7,Z-119-24-2 rezoning request on south east corner of 56th st and Shea




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this email.

Report Suspicious


Member of Planning Commission

Quinn Williams
Shareholder

Greenberg Traurig, LLP
2375 E. Camelback Rd. Suite 800 | Phoenix, AZ 85016
T +1 602.445.8343 | F +1 602.445.8647 | C +1 602.619.9002
Quinn.Williams@gtlaw.com | www.gtlaw.com [gtlaw.com] | View GT Biography [gtlaw.com]




From: Williams, Quinn P. (Shld-Phx-CP)
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 2:44 PM
To: 'pdd.planning@phoenix .gov'
Cc: 'George Burton'
Subject: Item7,Z-119-24-2 rezoning request on south east corner of 56th st and Shea

Phoenix Commission Members

For the last 15 years ,I have lived at 9731 n 56 th street south of the proposed rezoning applica on . Our neighborhood
is quarter mile south on 56st in Paradise Valley.

I object strongly to the request for a large medical office bldg. on Shea and 56 th st for the following reasons :

1) Traffic issues This rezoning will create terrible traffic issues on 56 st . Cars already use 56 st and Shea to go
south to Mountain View RD to avoid Shea . We have had several accidents at the le turn on 56 st and MTN
View.
2) Schools The land is across the street from 2 schools on 56 st for elementary children .
3) The traffic lights at the intersec on .The lights were just installed last year and accidents have already occurred.
4) Paradise Valley residen al community ….This development will disturb the residen al neighborhood less than
a mile south . Has this request been ve ed with the Traffic department of Paradise Valley ?
5) Traffic study Please do a traffic study on 56 t before you approve !




Quinn Williams
Shareholder

Greenberg Traurig, LLP
2375 E. Camelback Rd. Suite 800 | Phoenix, AZ 85016
T +1 602.445.8343 | F +1 602.445.8647 | C +1 602.619.9002
Quinn.Williams@gtlaw.com | www.gtlaw.com [gtlaw.com] | View GT Biography [gtlaw.com]




If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete
it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.




Racelle Escolar

From: tomvalalt@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 12:02 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: planning comm #7-Z119-24-2




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


please, please, please, reconsider approval of this request for the corner of 56th Street and Shea. The
size and mass of the project is not only excessive but has many alternate reasons why it should be
denied. With the addition of the new health center and the workout facility, traffic on Shea has increased
tremendously. Frequent backups stall traffic in all lanes in that area to Tatum and beyond to the West
and back toward the east as well. Cars coming south off 56th Street add to the the congestion as well.
Traffic on 56 has increased both North and South with access from Shea to the 101, few drive the speed
limit in spite of the slowdown in my area - (Sweetwater) with the school and the horse arena, and we have
frequent impatient red light runners causing accidents at my corner-56 and Sweetwater. (another one
just this past week). When traffic is backed up on Shea, it seems logical that people will look for an
alternate way to get around, traveling to the south through the neighborhood of residential streets. and
this is not what these people bought their homes in that area for. Health issues also should be
considered for the idling traffic sitting. waiting for the lights to change as our air quality is diminishing. I
know progress is inevitable but this just seems the absolute worst location to put in a large commercial
project and I hope you will listen to resident concerns when deciding on approval or disapproval.
Thank you for your consideration in a matter, that means so much to local residents, versus the big
corporate involvement!

Valerie Altgilbers
5538 East Sweetwater 85254
602-677-0366
Sent from AOL on Android [play.google.com]




Racelle Escolar

From: David
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2025 8:25 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Project 56th and Shea




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this
email.

Report Suspicious


To whom it may concern,

I am greatly concerned about the site and scale of the project being proposed for the medical facility at
56th and Shea. This is a residential neighborhood with increasing traffic, congestion and businesses
being built here. The shear size is the most concern for a residential neighborhood. I just learned of this
and thus why I am just emailing now. I appreciate the board taking these concerns into account when
allowing such a project.

David Matthew Zawrotny

-----------------------------------------