← Back to meetings

Meeting Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee-10/12/2022 complete

2022-10-12 · Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee

Items: 88

Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee

View on Agenda Online ↗


Synced: 2026-05-28 03:37 AZ

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on Sept. 16, 2020

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of Sept. 16, 2020, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 13



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
to Boards and Commissions

Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.




Page 14
ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: October 12, 2022
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: REVISED* FOR ADD-ON BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Alhambra Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Betty Guardado recommends the following for appointment:

Crystal Carrillo
Ms. Carrillo is a Community Development Specialist with Southwest Human
Development and a resident of District 1. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire
November 19, 2023.

Estrella Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Yassamin Ansari recommends the following for appointment:

Tino Hernandez
Mr. Hernandez is a Project Manager at Willmeng Construction and a resident of District
7. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2023.

*Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee

Councilman Jim Waring recommends the following for appointment:

Karen DeMoss
Ms. DeMoss is a retired nurse and resident of District 2. She fills a vacancy for a term to
expire November 19, 2023.




Page 15
Parks and Preserve Initiative Oversight Committee

I recommend the following for appointment:

Gary Kaasa
Mr. Kaasa is a member of the Riester Foundation and a resident of District 3. He
replaces Tom Chapman for a term to expire May 31, 2025.

Phoenix Arts and Culture Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Debra Larson
Ms. Larson is a Managing Client Partner at FranklinCovey and a resident of District 6.
She fills a vacancy for a term to expire September 30, 2025.

Dante Mitchell
Mr. Mitchell is an assistant at the State of Arizona Senate and a resident of District 4.
He fills a vacancy for a term to expire September 30, 2025.

Sophie O’Keefe-Zelman
Ms. O’Keefe-Zelman is the Director of OH Strategic Communications and a resident of
District 4. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire September 30, 2025.

I recommend the following for reappointment:

Sarah Epperson
Ms. Epperson is serving her second term to expire September 30, 2025.

Phoenix Parks and Recreation Board

I recommend the following for appointment:

Emma Viera
Ms. Viera is the Executive Director at Unlimited Potential and a resident of District 3.
She replaces Michael Lieb for a term to expire October 12, 2027.

Phoenix Youth and Education Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:




Page 16
Ariel Baber
Ms. Baber is a Program Training Liaison at Boys & Girls Clubs of the Valley. She fills a
vacancy for a term to expire August 30, 2025.

Eric Newberry
Mr. Newberry is a System Software Development Engineer at Intel Corporation. He fills
a vacancy for a term to expire August 30, 2025.

Kimberly Hanes
Ms. Hanes is the Maricopa County Regional Manager at the University of Arizona. She
fills a vacancy for a term to expire August 30, 2025.




Page 17



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Appointment of Municipal Court Judges

This item requests to appoint the following individuals as judges of the Phoenix
Municipal Court: Alexander Benezra and Heidi Gilbert to terms expiring on Jan. 17,
2026.

Summary
On Sept. 2, 2022, the Judicial Selection Advisory Board recommended six candidates
to be interviewed by the Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee.

On Sept. 14, 2022, after interviews and public comment, the Public Safety and Justice
Subcommittee unanimously recommended Alexander Benezra and Heidi Gilbert each
to be appointed as judges of the Phoenix Municipal Court.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the City Council
Office.




Page 18



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Infinity Nails & Spa

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 07070253.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 7 - Beer and Wine Bar

Location
830 E. Greenway Pkwy., Ste. 102
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 3

This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a nail salon
and beer and wine bar. This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and
does not have an interim permit. This location requires a Variance to allow a beer and
wine bar.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 24, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.




Page 19

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Dong Que (Series 7 and Series 12)
7420 W. Cactus Road, #B9 & B10, Peoria
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am currently an owner of a restaurant in Glendale that holds a license. I will continue
to abide by Arizona liquor laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I would like to offer my clients an adult beverage of their choice while relaxing and
enjoying their time at my salon.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Infinity Nails & Spa
Liquor License Map - Infinity Nails & Spa

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.


Page 20
Liquor License Data: INFINITY NAILS & SPA
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 1

Liquor Store 9 5 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 10 3

Restaurant 12 25 16



Crime Data

I Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***


I Property Crimes 55.33 159.44 3.29
I
I Violent Crimes 10.50 27.20 2.44
I
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within½ mile radius


Property Violation Data

I Description Average 1/2 Mile Average


I Parcels wNiolations 50 29
I
I Total Violations 87 78
I




Page 21
Page 22
Liquor License Map: INFINITY NAILS & SPA
830 E GREENWAY PKWY




Ü
Date: 8/31/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 23



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - J's Drive Thru

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 204935.

Summary

Applicant
Mohamad Awad, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
14875 N. Cave Creek Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 16, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Page 24

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I hold a certificate for 'The Basic Liquor Law Training'. This training provided me the
opportunity of learning the importance and significance of obtaining a beer and wine
license. I am assured to uphold the laws and regulations about beer and wine license.
I have never been involved in any city criminal activity, no record of getting in trouble
with law and authorities.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This store will provide safe and secure place for the neighborhood to buy beer and
wine. The location will be convenient for the people in neighborhood who may not
have access to transportation. Adding the long time experience of the owner with
running a store while upholding all the laws and regulations, the store will be safe,
secure and convenience place for the customers to purchase quality liquor.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - J's Drive Thru
Liquor License Map - J's Drive Thru

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Level Up Spirits

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 201065.

Summary

Applicant
Lawrence Files, Agent

License Type
Series 18 - Craft Distiller

Location
15206 N. Cave Creek Road, Ste. 15258-60
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a craft distiller. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 17, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 29


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have founded and sold many businesses. I have always been insistant on both
compliance with the laws, but also operating within the spirit of the laws. Our proposed
operation is blending cocktails in 5 gal kegs for selling to Retail location - their is no
consuption on site.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Once established & operating we will look to hire employers to help in blending and
filling the kegs.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Level Up Spirits
Liquor License Map - Level Up Spirits

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 30
Liquor License Data: LEVEL UP SPIRITS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 2 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 5

Restaurant 12 5 2



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 54.70 68.31 113.90

Violent Crimes 10.36 14.25 21.65

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 51 188

Total Violations 89 353




Page 31
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1033061 921 18 % 28 % 32 %

1033062 2272 17 % 22 % 37 %

1035011 1381 67 % 5% 23 %

1035012 999 80 % 8% 26 %

1036061 1067 84 % 15 % 13 %

1036062 854 90 % 13 % 4%

1036063 2174 78 % 13 % 25 %

1036071 1285 83 % 3% 18 %

1036074 1299 89 % 0% 3%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 32
Liquor License Map: LEVEL UP SPIRITS
15206 N CAVE CREEK RD




Ü
Date: 8/29/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 33



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Xavier College Preparatory Roman Catholic
High School

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Maria Murphy-Fontes

Location
4710 N. 5th St.
Council District: 4

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 5, 2022 - 5 p.m. to 11:55 p.m. / 500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 34



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - SS. Simon & Jude Roman Catholic Cathedral
Phoenix

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Phillip Lester

Location
6351 N. 27th Ave.
Council District: 5

Function
Fall Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Oct. 23, 2022 - Noon to 7 p.m. / 450 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 35



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Keystone Montessori Charter School, Inc.

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Melissa Risinger-Sutton

Location
1025 E. Liberty Lane
Council District: 6

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 12, 2022 - 3 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 300 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 36



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Madison Camelview Parent-Teacher
Organization, Inc. (PTO)

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Shannon de Villiers

Location
5601 N. 16th St.
Council District: 6

Function
Theater Show

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 18, 2022 - 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 450 attendees
Nov. 19, 2022 - Noon to 4 p.m. / 450 attendees
Nov. 20, 2022 - Noon to 4 p.m. / 450 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 37



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Madison Camelview Parent - Teacher
Organization, Inc. (PTO)

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Shannon de Villiers

Location
5601 N. 16th St.
Council District: 6

Function
Ballet Performance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Dec. 3, 2022 - Noon to 9:30 p.m. / 700 attendees
Dec. 4, 2022 - Noon to 3:30 p.m. / 350 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 38



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Madison Camelview Parent-Teacher
Organization, Inc. (PTO)

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Shannon de Villiers

Location
5601 N. 16th St.
Council District: 6

Function
Music Concert

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Dec. 11, 2022 - 2 p.m. to 6 p.m. / 600 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 39



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Madison Camelview Parent-Teacher
Organization, Inc. (PTO)

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Shannon de Villiers

Location
5601 N. 16th St.
Council District: 6

Function
Ballet Performance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Dec. 17, 2022 - Noon to 9:30 p.m. / 350 attendees
Dec. 18, 2022 - Noon to 3:30 p.m. / 350 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 40



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - St. Benedict Roman Catholic Parish Phoenix

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Mary Jane Livens

Location
16035 S. 48th St.
Council District: 6

Function
Parish Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 17, 2022 - 5 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. / 300 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 41



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - St. Thomas The Apostle Roman Catholic Parish
- Phoenix

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Steven Kunkel

Location
2312 E. Campbell Ave.
Council District: 6

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 5, 2022 - 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. / 2,500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 42



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Cocina Adamex

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 206098.

Summary

Applicant
Adriana Zapata, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
416 N. 7th Ave.
Zoning Classification: DTC-Van Buren ABOD
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor alcohol consumption.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 17, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Page 43

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“My dedication to serve the community begins with working as purchasing agent for
public schools for 14 years. I am also a qualified general contractor in good standing
with the Registrar of Contractor. I understand the commitment to adhere to State and
local laws and ordinances, to ensure compliance and safety.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Downtown Phoenix is trasforming and with the addition of multi- family housing in the
area, the residents will benefit from a local place for socializing near their home. The
restaurant is of a family-friendly atmosphere and would be condusive a healthy
neighborhood establishment.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Cocina Adamex
Liquor License Map - Cocina Adamex

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 44
Liquor License Data: COCINA ADAMEX
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 5 2

Government 5 6 0

Bar 6 43 8

Beer and Wine Bar 7 15 1

Liquor Store 9 4 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 10 5

Hotel 11 7 0

Restaurant 12 105 16

Club 14 1 1



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 54.70 183.30 210.93

Violent Crimes 10.36 56.68 56.47

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 51 193

Total Violations 90 435




Page 45
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1129001 1670 70 % 4% 19 %

1129002 815 37 % 22 % 24 %

1129003 1372 4% 18 % 40 %

1129004 1325 47 % 24 % 52 %

1130001 1218 23 % 16 % 11 %

1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %

1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %

1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %

1143011 1389 22 % 15 % 57 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 46
Liquor License Map: COCINA ADAMEX
416 N 7TH AVE




Ü
Date: 8/22/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 47



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - La Hefa Cerveceria Y Botanas

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 206674.

Summary

Applicant
Francisco Gaucin, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
7710 W. Lower Buckeye Road, Ste. 107
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 16, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 48

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Cash Nightclub & Lounge (Series 6)
1730 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 6
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have completed both the basic and management training required in addition to
having the proper business management experience.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“As a local small business, the location will provide jobs."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - La Hefa Cerveceria Y Botanas
Liquor License Map - La Hefa Cerveceria Y Botanas

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 49
Liquor License Data: LA HEFA CERVECERIA Y BOTANAS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 0

Restaurant 12 4 3



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 54.70 77.70 141.40

Violent Crimes 10.36 10.50 12.52

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 51 1

Total Violations 90 1


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1125101 3939 67 % 5% 4%

1125102 931 93 % 10 % 39 %

1125111 2081 76 % 7% 11 %

1125112 3036 75 % 12 % 13 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 50
Liquor License Map: LA HEFA CERVECERIA Y BOTANAS
7710 W LOWER BUCKEYE RD




Ü
Date: 8/22/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 51



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Quartz Desert Tiki

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 06070061.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
345 W. Van Buren St., Ste. B
Zoning Classification: DTC-Van Buren HP
Council District: 7

This request is for an ownership transfer and location transfer of a liquor license for a
bar. This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an
interim permit. This business has plans to open in December 2022.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 17, 2022.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Page 52

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Quartz Desert Tiki will offer a variety of specialty cocktails inspired by deserts of the
world in a relaxed atmosphere. Applicant would like to offer alcoholic beverages to
guests 21 and over.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Quartz Desert Tiki
Liquor License Map - Quartz Desert Tiki

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 53
Liquor License Data: QUARTZ DESERT TIKI
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 4 1

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 9 3

Bar 6 47 26

Beer and Wine Bar 7 14 7

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 4

Hotel 11 7 3

Restaurant 12 99 37

Club 14 3 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 54.70 186.14 254.98

Violent Crimes 10.36 58.46 77.70

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 51 96

Total Violations 90 225




Page 54
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1129002 815 37 % 22 % 24 %

1129003 1372 4% 18 % 40 %

1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %

1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %

1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %

1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %

1143011 1389 22 % 15 % 57 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 55
Liquor License Map: QUARTZ DESERT TIKI
345 W VAN BUREN ST




Ü
Date: 8/22/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 56



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Alwun House Foundation

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Dana Johnson

Location
1204 E. Roosevelt St.
Council District: 8

Function
Halloween Ball

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Oct. 29, 2022 - 7 p.m. to 1 a.m. / 300 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 57



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Horses Help Foundation

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Gregg Goodman

Location
113 N. 16th St.
Council District: 8

Function
Wine Tasting

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Jan. 27, 2023 - 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 150 attendees
Jan. 28, 2023 - 11 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. / 2,250 attendees
Jan. 29, 2023 - 11 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. / 1,350 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 58



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Rosie's House: A Music Academy for Children,
Inc.

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Kevin Gorman

Location
919 E. Jefferson St.
Council District: 8

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Oct. 28, 2022 - 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. / 75 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 59



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Valleywise Health Foundation

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Victoria Katz

Location
2601 E. Roosevelt St.
Council District: 8

Function
Reception

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 1, 2022 - 5 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. / 100 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 60



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Bingo License - Knights of Columbus St Paul's Council 15001

Request for a Class B Bingo License.

Summary
State law requires City Council approval before a State Bingo License can be issued.

Bingo License Types
Class A - gross receipts shall not exceed $15,600 per year
Class B - gross receipts shall not exceed $300,000 per year
Class C - anticipated gross receipts may exceed $300,00 per year

Applicant
David La Plante

Location
330 W. Coral Gables Drive
Zoning Classification: S-1
Council District: 3

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 61



PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-49036) (Items 24-31)
Ordinance S-49036 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-13.

24 Dibble & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc doing
business as Dibble
For $14,111.76 in additional payment authority for Contract 153656 for
Change Order 01, for the AV41000074 Phoenix-Goodyear Airport
Drainage Improvements Project for the Aviation Department. Additional
spending authority is due to the unforeseen conditions requiring field
changes which extends the time to complete. As a result of the Contractor
encountering these significant changed site conditions, the construction
time will need to be extended which will also extend the Construction
Administration and Inspection services we require on the part of the
Engineer.

25 Fiesta Events Inc.
For $10,000.00 in payment authority for the Fiesta Bowl Sponsorship for
the Aviation Department. The Aviation Department has been a sponsor
and participant of the Fiesta Bowl Parade for more than two decades. The
sponsorship promotes Sky Harbor in the community as well as workforce
opportunities within the City of Phoenix system of airports.

26 Various Vendors for Social Media and Digital Services
For $50,000.00 in payment authority for various social media and digital
services vendors, including Facebook and Instagram, for advertising and

Page 62

promotional services for the Communications Office on behalf of other
City departments, except the Phoenix Police Department. The
Communications Office is responsible for monitoring, updating, and
creating content to be placed on social media platforms for City
departments. Social media platforms have proven to be an effective tool
for City messaging, including advertising and promoting City programs
and services.

27 Heritage Strategies International doing business as
PlaceEconomics
For $45,000.00 in payment authority to purchase Phase II of the
Preservation Phoenix Style Study for the Historic Preservation Office for
the Planning and Development Department. Phase I of this study, which
focused on the economic impact of historic preservation efforts in
Phoenix, was completed in October 2021. The report findings were
presented to and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission
(HPC) and City Council. With the recommendation for further study from
the HPC on Feb. 14, 2022, Phase II of the Preservation Phoenix Style
Study would build upon the research findings from Phase I and utilize
local focus groups over the course of five months to analyze city-level
historic preservation tools and incentives nationwide. This will result in a
report of historic preservation policy and incentive recommendations
specific to Phoenix. The purchase is budgeted in the Historic
Preservation Office's operating budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

28 Ravenii LLC
For $80,000.00 in payment authority to purchase, deploy and maintain
additional network sensors-security monitoring hardware for the
Information Technology Services Department. The equipment is needed
to support the City's security information and event management system.
The hardware allows greater threat visibility, allowing the City to better
identify internal and external threats, abnormal behavior, or potential
cyber-attacks.

29 Databank IMX LLC
For $40,000.00 in payment authority to purchase OnBase annual
maintenance, hardware, software and professional services for the
Municipal Court. OnBase is the Arizona Supreme Court's electronic


Page 63

document management system statewide standard. It is critical for the
Court to continue to have OnBase maintenance, hardware, software and
professional services from Databank IMX, LLC as not doing so would
impact the Municipal Court’s business operations.

30 Settlement of Claim(s) Bercy v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $50,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in Bercy
v. City of Phoenix, 2:20-cv-01948-SRB, 19-0205-001, GL, for the
Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a
settlement of a claim involving the Housing Department.

31 Settlement of Claim(s) TransDev v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $38,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in
TransDev v. City of Phoenix, 21-0362-002, GL, PD, for the Finance
Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a
settlement for a property damage claim arising from an incident on Sept.
20, 2021, involving the Street Transportation Department.




Page 64



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance and Dedication of Easements for Multi-Use Trail, Public Utility and
Sidewalk Purposes (Ordinance S-49062)

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements for multi-use, public
utility and sidewalk purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interest below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: HH-35th & Baseline, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Multi-use Trail
Location: 7650 S. 35th Ave.
File: FN 220069
Council District: 7

Easement (b)
Applicant: HH-35th & Baseline, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 7650 S. 35th Ave.
File: FN 220069
Council District: 7

Easement (c)
Applicant: HH-35th & Baseline, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 7650 S. 35th Ave.
File: FN 220069
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Alan
Stephenson, and the Planning and Development and Finance departments.


Page 65



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of an Easement for Drainage Purposes (Ordinance S-49061)

Request for the City Council to accept an easement for drainage purposes; further
ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: Pinnaclepeaksilverino LLC; Pinnaclepeak3350 LLC; Pinnaclepeak3300
LLC; its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 23777 N. 3rd Ave.
File: FN 220051
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Alan
Stephenson, and the Planning and Development and Finance departments.




Page 66



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acquisition of Water and Sewer Easements Along the East Side of 91st Avenue
and South of Broadway Road for Lift Station 61 (Ordinance S-49046)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire water and sewer
easements along the east side of 91st Avenue and south of Broadway Road for the Lift
Station 61 Redundant Force Main project. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
Water and sewer easements are needed to upgrade outdated infrastructure at Lift
Station 61. The lift station will undergo modernization, and a redundant force main will
be added for flexibility of use and to serve as a back-up.

The parcels affected by this project are identified in Attachment A.

Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget.

Location
East side of 91st Avenue, south of Broadway Road.
Council District: 7 and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Karen
Peters, and the Water Services and Finance departments.




Page 67
Attachment A
Property Identification


91st Avenue and south of Broadway Road for Lift Station 61

The following improved and/or unimproved parcels affected by acquisition and
included in this request are identified by the Maricopa County Assessor’s parcel
number (APN) and the address or location.


APN Address / Location
101-35-001W along 91st Avenue, south of W. Broadway Road
101-35-001X along 91st Avenue, south of W. Broadway Road
101-35-005G along 91st Avenue, south of W. Broadway Road
101-35-007B along 91st Avenue, south of W. Broadway Road




1 of 1
Page 68



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acquisition of Real Property for Roadway Improvements Along 35th Avenue
from the Interstate 10 Freeway to Camelback Road (Ordinance S-49052)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire all real property
and related property interests required by donation, purchase within the City's
appraised value, or by the power of eminent domain for roadway improvements along
35th Avenue from the Interstate 10 Freeway (I-10) to Camelback Road. Further
request to authorize dedication of land with roadway and/or public improvements to
public use for right-of-way purposes via separate recording instrument. Additionally
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
Acquisition of real property is required to accommodate roadway improvements along
35th Avenue from the I-10 to Camelback Road. The project improvements include the
installation and upgrading of traffic signals, pedestrian hybrid beacons, and street
lighting. Improvements will be upgraded to meet current City standards and comply
with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The parcels affected by this project are identified in Attachment A.

Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget.

Location
Along 35th Avenue from I-10 to Camelback Road.
Council Districts: 4 and 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.




Page 69
Attachment A
Property Identification

Acquisition of Real Property for Roadway Improvements Along 35th Ave. from
the Interstate 10 Freeway to Camelback Road

The following improved and/or unimproved parcels affected by acquisition and
included in this request are identified by the Maricopa County Assessor’s parcel
number (APN) and the address or location.

APN Address / Location
106-07-120E 1426 N. 35th Ave.
106-07-120F 1402 N. 35th Ave.
107-06-001A 4812 N. 35th Ave.
107-06-003B 3501 W. Camelback Road
107-06-003E 4808 N. 35th Ave.
107-06-004 4836 N. 35th Ave.
107-06-013 3502 W. Mariposa St.
107-07-007A 4650 N. 35th Ave.
107-07-074A 4622 N. 35th Ave.
107-10-155 3514 W. Hazelwood St.
107-10-007D 4440 N. 35th Ave.
107-10-007E 4438 N. 35th Ave.
107-10-009C 4410 N. 35th Ave.
107-10-010A 4336 N. 35th Ave.
107-10-084 4326 N. 35th Ave.
107-11-014 4238 N. 35th Ave.
107-11-020C 3522 Grand Ave.
107-11-031 4220 N. 35th Ave.
107-11-036B 4170 N. 35th Ave.
107-11-036C 4150 N. 35th Ave.
107-11-039D 4246 N. 35th Ave.
107-11-040 4308 N. 35th Ave.
107-19-074 3030 N. 35th Ave.
107-19-075B 3532 W. Thomas Road
107-19-075C 2910 N. 35th Ave.
107-20-103 3302 N. 35th Ave.


1 of 5
Page 70
APN Address / Location
107-20-104 3320 N. 35th Ave.
107-20-105 3106 N. 35th Ave.
107-33-025A 4098 N. 35th Ave.
107-33-025B 3828 N. 35th Ave.
107-33-026E 3602 N. 35th Ave.
107-33-026F 3515 W. Clarendon Ave.
107-33-026G 3602 N. 35th Ave
107-33-026J 3550 N. 35th Ave
107-33-031G 3402 N. 35th Ave.
107-33-031M 3420 N. 35th Ave.
107-33-031R 3536 W. Osborn Road
108-02-012B 3839 N. 35th Ave.
108-02-013A 3441 N. 35th Ave.
108-02-026 3801 N. 35th Ave.
108-02-031A 3655 N. 35th Ave.
108-02-032A 3433 W. Clarendon Ave.
108-02-033 3637 N. 35th Ave.
108-02-046A 3621 N. 35th Ave.
108-02-047A 3805 N. 34th Ave.
108-02-054A 3401 N. 35th Ave.
108-03-004B 3440 W. Thomas Road
108-03-018A 3319 N. 35th Ave.
108-03-020A 3141 N. 35th Ave.
108-03-021 3127 N. 35th Ave.
108-03-023 3113 N. 35th Ave.
108-03-024 3464 W. Earll Drive
108-03-033 3005 N. 35th Ave.
108-03-034A 2915 W. 35th Ave.
108-03-036 3416 W. Thomas Road
108-03-099 3321 N. 35th Ave.
108-03-103 3033 N. 35th Ave.
108-09-043C 2502 N. 34th Drive
108-09-044 3442 W. Wilshire Drive
108-09-064A 2333 N. 35th Ave.
108-09-065 2305 N. 35th Ave.
108-10-130C 2601 N. 35th Ave.
108-10-130D 2609 N. 35th Ave.


2 of 5
Page 71
APN Address / Location
108-10-130G 2627 N. 35th Ave.
108-10-131 3443 W. Thomas Road
108-10-132H 2807 N. 35th Ave.
108-10-132J 2801 N. 35th Ave.
108-10-133 2831 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-001D 2522 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-002C 2518 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-002D 2516 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-005C 3505 W. Thomas Road
108-11-005K 2650 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-005M 2608 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-005W 2806 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-013 2650 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-014B 2814 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-018A 2804 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-018B 2802 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-050 2540 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-083 2806 N. 35th Ave.
108-11-084 2612 N. 35th Ave.
108-14-026 2348 N. 35th Ave.
108-14-028 2238 N. 35th Ave.
108-14-029 2336 N. 35th Ave.
108-14-030 2332 N. 35th Ave.
108-14-045 2318 N. 35th Ave.
108-14-074 2508 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-037 2243 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-038A 2235 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-039A 2243 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-057 2223 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-058B 2221 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-058C 2223 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-060 2215 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-061 2213 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-062 2219 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-121 2119 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-122 2119 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-123 3440 W. Holly St.


3 of 5
Page 72
APN Address / Location
108-18-124 2109 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-125 2119 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-142 2001 N. 35th Ave
108-18-144 2013 N. 35th Ave.
108-18-145 2001 N. 35th Ave.
108-19-001E 3501 W. Encanto Blvd.
108-19-001G 2120 N. 35th Ave.
108-19-001J 2212 N. 35th Ave.
108-19-001N 2060 N. 35th Ave.
108-19-001P 2042 N. 35th Ave.
108-19-002A 2002 N. 35th Ave.
108-19-002C 2014 N. 35th Ave.
108-24-001 1834 N. 35th Ave.
108-24-023 1824 N. 35th Ave.
108-24-025 1812 N. 35th Ave.
108-24-026 3503 W. Granada Road
108-24-045 1808 N. 35th Ave.
108-24-046 1812 N. 35th Ave.
108-24-047 3501 W. Coronado Road
108-24-067A 3502 W. Almeria Road
108-25-001 1701 N. 35th Ave.
108-25-026 3444 W. Mcdowell Road
108-25-027 1825 N. 35th Ave.
108-26-005A 1701 N. 35th Ave.
109-11-002 1517 N. 35th Ave.
109-11-004A 1507 N. 35th Ave.
145-15-107 3502 W. Camelback Road
153-17-005D 3446 W. Camelback Road
154-08-028 3433 W. Camelback Road
154-08-029 4837 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-030 4831 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-031 4825 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-032 4819 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-033 4813 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-034 4807 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-035 4801 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-122 4745 N. 35th Ave.


4 of 5
Page 73
APN Address / Location
154-08-123 4739 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-124 4735 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-125 4729 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-126 4723 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-127 4717 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-162 4707 N. 35th Ave.
154-08-163 4701 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-001 3441 W. Campbell Ave.
154-22-036 4431 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-037 4427 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-038 4421 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-039 4417 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-040 4411 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-041 4407 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-110 3442 W. Glenrosa Ave.
154-22-111 4311 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-112 4315 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-113 4321 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-114 4325 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-115 4331 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-116 4335 N. 35th Ave.
154-22-117 4341 N. 35th Ave.
154-23-070B 4135 N. 35th Ave.
154-23-073C 4117 N. 34th Ave.
154-23-073D 4235 N. 35th Ave.
154-23-076E 4133 N. 35th Ave.
154-23-078 4201 N. 35th Ave.
Unassessed 4416 N. 35th Ave.




5 of 5
Page 74



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Execute Short-term Licenses on Vacant City-owned Property
including Parking Lots for Downtown Special Events (Ordinance S-49038)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute short-term licenses
on vacant City-owned property including parking lots for downtown special events held
between Nov. 1, 2022, and Nov. 1, 2024. Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept all necessary funds related to this item.

Summary
The Finance Department's Real Estate Division regularly receives requests from
private entities to license City-owned property during special events held downtown.
The Real Estate Division, in consultation and coordination with the event organizer
and/or local host committee, will enter into licenses for use of vacant City-owned
property in support of those special events.

The term of each license shall not exceed 30-days. The license fee will be based on
market rent and/or other valuable consideration, as determined by the Real Estate
Division. Each license may contain other terms and conditions acceptable to the City
based on the use. Each licensee shall provide insurance and indemnification
acceptable to the City’s Risk Management Division and the Law Department.

Financial Impact
The license fee will be based on market rent and/or other valuable consideration.

Location
Various locations within Downtown Phoenix.
Council District(s): 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 75



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Sports Uniforms and Promotional Items - IFB 19-055 - Amendment (Ordinance S-
49039)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
contracts 150151 with Touchdown Sportswear & Promotions, LLC; 150152 with SP
Designs & Manufacturing, Inc.; 150153 with Balzic Enterprises, LLC doing business as
M&J Trophies and Apparel; and 150154 with Dumars Industries LLC, doing business
as Explosion Sportswear and Image Sourcing, to allow Citywide use of the contracts
for the purchase of promotional items. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$244,000.00.

Summary
These contracts will provide personalized promotional products such as volunteer t-
shirts and employee awards in support of various department programs such as the
Library Card Campaign and reading achievements, on an as needed basis.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 14, 2024.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $244,000.00 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $1,309,000.00. Funds are available in various departments'
budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Sports Uniforms and Promotional Items, Contracts 150151, 150152, 150153,
150154, S-45726, on June 5, 2019.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 76



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fujitsu Maintenance and Service Level Agreement - Amendment (Ordinance S-
49040)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 145958 with Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. for
the purchase of maintenance and support of Fujitsu equipment, components, and
hardware for the Information Technology Services Department and in support of the
Regional Wireless Cooperative (RWC). Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$32,000.

Summary
This contract currently covers maintenance for 52 Fujitsu multiplexers throughout the
radio communications network, which serves the RWC public safety radio
communications partners. The equipment provides a fiber optic platform proven to
perform for the wireless microwave network, integrating services for public safety
agencies in the Phoenix region to ensure the delivery of communications in the form of
voice and data traffic. Fujitsu Network Communication, Inc., is the manufacturer of this
hardware, and is the only provider for maintenance and support. The support includes
technical engineering, firmware updates, product support, and repair/return of faulty
components. The additional funds requested will cover the annual subscription for the
remaining term of the contract.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on Aug. 31, 2023.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $32,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $207,000. Funds are available in the Information Technology
Services Department's budget.




Page 77

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously approved the Fujitsu Maintenance and Service Level
Agreement Contract 145958 (Ordinance S-43828) on Aug. 30, 2017.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Information
Technology Services Department.




Page 78



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Microscope and Annual Service Maintenance
Agreement - IFB 18-031 - Amendment (Ordinance S-49047)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 146534 with Thermo Electron North America, LLC to extend the contract
term. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $9,000.

Summary
This contract provides an annual maintenance and service agreement for one Thermo
Electron North America FTIR Microscope for the Police Department and includes
factory trained and authorized service personnel. This extension will allow additional
time to complete the new procurement.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through Nov. 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $9,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $107,000. Funds are available in the Police Department’s
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Microscope and Annual Service Maintenance
Agreement - Contract 146534 (Ordinance S-44090) on Nov. 29, 2017.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.




Page 79



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Heavy Equipment Rental - CO-OP 20-097 - Amendment (Ordinance S-49053)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 152656 with Herc Rentals Inc, for the purchase of Heavy
Equipment Rental for Citywide use. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $2.5
million.

Summary
This contract currently provides both small and large equipment of various makes,
models and sizes, on as needed basis. It also provides short term and long term rental
access to a complete line of heavy equipment, road maintenance equipment and
construction equipment. The primary users of the contract are Public Works, Water
Services, Parks and Recreation, and Fire department. Approximately 65 percent of the
contract spend is used by enterprise funds. Due to high volume of usage, it has
become necessary to increase the funding to cover the remaining term of the contract.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2025.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $2.5 million in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $4 million. Funds are available in the various departments'
budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Heavy Equipment Rental Contract 152656 (Ordinance S-46809) on June 24, 2020

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 80



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Dry Well and Interceptor Pumping and Inspection - IFB 20-FMD-045 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-49057)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 152057 with MP Environmental Services, Inc. for the
purchase of dry well interceptor and grease trap pumping and inspection services for
various departments. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $220,000.

Summary
This contract provides regular cleaning, pumping, and maintenance of dry wells and
interceptors, including grease traps, for proper collection, retention, and drainage of
runoff, stormwater and other water sources. The contract also provides repairs to the
systems on an as-needed basis. Additional funds are necessary to allow use of the
contract by all Citywide departments that require grease trap cleaning services.

Contract Term
The contract terms remains unchanged, ending on May 31, 2023 with two option years
to extend until May 31, 2025.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $220,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $2,527,498. Funds are available in the various departments'
budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Dry Well and Interceptor Pumping and Inspection, Contract 152057 (Ordinance S-
46576) on May 6, 2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 81



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Safety Data Sheet Database Management Services - RFP 17-019-Amendment
(Ordinance S-49067)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 146267 with Kelleher, Helmrich & Associates Inc. to extend the contract term
and allow additional expenditures to provide Safety Data Sheet (SDS) database
management services for the Office of Environmental Programs. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $8,000.

Summary
This contract will provide a web-based SDS database, updates, and maintenance
services for the Office of Environmental Programs to manage safety data records of
chemicals and products used citywide. The database is available to all City employees
through the Inside Phoenix website and can easily be searched by a facility name,
product name, manufacturer, or SDS number. In the event of workplace exposure to
chemical products, City employees can give emergency and medical responders the
correct SDS. The extension of this contract will provide continued services to comply
with federal standards. This contract extension will allow for a new procurement to be
completed without a lapse in services.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through April 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $8,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $128,000. Funds are available in the Office of Environmental
Program's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council
The City Council previously reviewed this request:



Page 82

• Safety Data Sheet Database Management Services Contract 146267 (Ordinance S-
43984) on Oct. 18, 2017.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Office of
Environmental Programs.




Page 83



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Execute Short-term Licenses and Agreements with the United
States of America for Use and Access onto City-owned Property (Ordinance S-
49071)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute short-term licenses
and agreements with the United States of America for use and access onto City-owned
property to conduct various military training exercises and activities through Dec. 31,
2023. Further request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to grant an
exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to include indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions, if required, that would otherwise be prohibited by
Phoenix City Code 42-18.

Summary
The United States of America (United States) through its military branches, in
coordination with the Police and/or Fire departments, periodically conducts training on
City-owned property to assist in responding to incidents that involve national security
defense. The City will enter into a license or use agreement (Agreement) for each
training exercise to be conducted on a City-owned property.

The term of each Agreement shall not exceed 14 days and may be terminated at any
time upon mutual written consent of both parties. Each Agreement will contain
insurance and indemnification acceptable to the City’s Risk Management Division and
the Law Department. Each Agreement may contain other terms and conditions
deemed necessary by the City.

Financial Impact
There is no fee associated with each Agreement, as the United States is responsible
for all costs related to its use.

Location
Citywide

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.



Page 84



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement Between Maricopa County and Phoenix Municipal
Court for Use of Maricopa County Telecom Services (Ordinance S-49076)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the Phoenix Municipal
Court to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Maricopa County’s
Office of Enterprise Technology Department for the use of telecom services at the
Intake, Transfer, and Release (ITR) facility. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The agreement will not exceed
$25,000.

Summary
The IGA will establish responsibilities and costs for the parties regarding the use of
telecom services at the ITR facility located at 2670 W. 28th Drive, Phoenix, Arizona
85009. The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office and Phoenix Municipal Court share
operations and use of the ITR facility. Arizona Revised Statutes section 11-952
authorizes the County and City, as public agencies, to enter into IGAs for joint
cooperative action and agreement for the operation and use of County telecom
services.

Contract Term
This agreement will be effective upon approval of both parties' governing bodies and
shall remain in effect until June 30, 2025. The agreement may be renewed for one
additional two-year term upon mutual consent of the parties.

Financial Impact
The total aggregate value will not exceed $25,000 including option years. The
estimated annual expenditure of the agreement is $5,000. Funding is available in the
Phoenix Municipal Court’s budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Municipal Court.




Page 85



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization for the Phoenix Municipal Court to Apply for, Accept and Enter
into an Agreement for Pilot Hybrid Hearings Program (Ordinance S-49077)

Request to retroactively authorize the Phoenix Municipal Court to apply for, accept and
enter into an agreement with the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) for the
Hybrid Hearings Improvement Initiative Pilot Program.

Summary
The National Center for State Courts (NCSC) awarded grants to state and local courts
as part of its Hybrid Hearings Improvement Initiative Pilot Program. The Phoenix
Municipal Court was made aware of the opportunity to apply for this program in late
June and the application was due in mid-July. The Court was informed that it had been
selected as a participant in August. The goal of this program is to assist courts in
learning from, and improving upon, pandemic-era best practices to create permanent
changes to the way courts conduct hybrid hearings, as well as overall improvement of
remote and virtual offerings. As a participant, the Court will receive support from NCSC
to implement technical and operational solutions which may include facilitating the
purchase and installation of technical equipment in a minimum of one courtroom,
integration with existing systems, and technical assistance to support the preliminary
operation of the equipment and development of hybrid hearing procedures.

Contract Term
The term for this agreement is September 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the general fund.

Responsible Department
The item is recommended by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Municipal
Court.




Page 86



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Transfer of Retirement Funds to Arizona State Retirement System (Ordinance S-
49055)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to transfer retirement funds for
Amy Corriveau in the amount of $96,627.52 to the Arizona State Retirement System.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse the funds.

Summary
Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, sections 38-730 and 38-922, retirement service
credits for former members of the City of Phoenix Employees’ Retirement System
(COPERS) may be transferred to the Arizona State Retirement System upon approval
by the City Council. The following former City of Phoenix employee has requested
transfer of the balance of their credited service:

Corriveau, Amy: $96,627.52

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was approved by the COPERS Board at the Aug. 4, 2022 meeting.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Retirement
Office.




Page 87



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
ARPA Phoenix Resilient Food System Program - Enter into Agreements with
Arizona State University and St. Mary’s Food Bank (Ordinance S-49079)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into three agreements
with: (1) Arizona State University (“ASU”) to support a food waste education and
composting project; (2) ASU to support an Agri-Food Tech Incubator project; and (3)
St. Mary’s Food Bank to support a farm to food banks project. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to these items. Funding is
available through the City’s allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act (“ARPA”)
funding to the Phoenix Resilient Food System Program by the ARPA Strategic Plan
approved by the Mayor and Council. There is no impact to the General Fund. The
aggregate expenditures of these contracts will not exceed $1,260,000.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Office of Environmental Programs
(“OEP”) developed a food assistance plan to address the food needs of vulnerable
populations and communities impacted by COVID-19. The plan provides: (1) access to
healthy foods for impacted populations; (2) infrastructure assistance regarding
transportation and delivery with a focus on home delivery; (3) support for food banks,
food pantries and community food support agencies; (4) support for increased local
food production; and (5) business and employment opportunities throughout the food
system spectrum.

ARPA Phoenix Resilient Food System Program
Supporting the following project will provide inclusive economic and business
opportunities and training, decrease food insecurity and hunger, and reduce food
waste in Phoenix.

(1) ASU - Agri-Food Tech Incubator Project
ASU will establish an Agri-Food Tech Incubator, based on their proven Resource
Innovation and Solutions Network experience across metro Phoenix and integrate the
knowledge and best practices from other food systems and agricultural hubs. The Agri-
Food Tech Incubator will connect food system entrepreneurs and ecosystem
stakeholders to resources and services needed to support growth of new ventures,
new products and/or services, and to support existing food-related businesses to
expand the size and scope of the sustainable food and agriculture economy in the City


Page 88

of Phoenix. It will include pathways for COVID-19-impacted Black, Indigenous, and
People of Color (BIPOC) communities to realize economic development opportunities
within the sustainable food systems and agricultural technology space.

(2) ASU - Food Waste and Composting Education Project
This one-year program will provide food waste and composting education, training,
and access to a compost service for up to 400 residents living in COVID-19-impacted
areas and food deserts in Phoenix. Participants will learn how to decrease food loss
and waste through practical and usable tips, such as better food purchasing, storing
food practices, meal planning tools, and composting. By learning about and adopting
better practices, COVID-19-impacted households can save money and become more
food-secure.

(3) St. Mary’s Food Bank - Farm to Food Banks Project
This program will source produce primarily from farms within the City of Phoenix,
including from small and BIPOC farms impacted by COVID-19. The produce will be
delivered directly from the farm to St. Mary’s and agency partners (food pantries) who
will distribute produce to Phoenix clients. Funds will be used for food purchases with a
small portion being allocated to increase St. Mary’s ability to store and distribute
produce while reducing food waste.

Procurement Information
Services may be procured, as needed, in accordance with Administrative Regulation
3.10 to implement and administer programs intended to prevent, prepare for, and
respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Contract Term
The contract term will be as follows:

· ASU - Agri-Food Tech Incubator Project from October 31, 2022, to May 31, 2024;
· ASU - Food Waste and Composting Education Project from October 31, 2022, to
June 30, 2023;
· St. Mary’s Food Bank - Farm to Food Banks Project from October 24, 2022, to
October 31, 2023.

All agreements may be extended based on available funding, which extensions may
be executed by the City Manager, or his designee.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City's
allocation of ARPA funding to the Phoenix Resilient Food System Program by the

Page 89

allocation of ARPA funding to the Phoenix Resilient Food System Program by the
ARPA Strategic Plan approved by the Mayor and Council.

The funding breakdown is as follows:

· $750,000 for the ASU - Agri-Food Tech Incubator Project;
· $310,000 for the ASU - Food Waste and Composting Education Project;
· $200,000 for the St. Mary’s Food Bank - Farm to Food Banks Project.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· ARPA Strategic Plan on June 8, 2021;
· ARPA Phoenix Resilient Food System allocation on June 7, 2022.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Office of
Environmental Programs.




Page 90



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Amend the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Family Self-Sufficiency Service Coordinator Grant (Ordinance S-49066)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the not-to-
exceed amount of Ordinance S-48611, from $325,000 to $600,000 due to increased
allowable grant application annual terms and dollar amounts for the Family Self-
Sufficiency (FSS) Service Coordinator grant from the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD). Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to
accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds for the life of the grant.

Summary
On May 11, 2022, the City Council approved applying for the FSS Service
Coordinator grant from HUD. The Housing Department has received funding
through this grant program for the past several years and requested City Council
approval to apply prior to the issuance of the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA).
Upon release of the NOFA, it was noted that the grant terms allowed up to a two-
year grant award, providing funding for calendar year 2023 and 2024, and
increasing the potential award amount up to $600,000. The increased funding may
allow additional staff to be hired.

This ongoing program helps caseworkers develop local strategies to connect
participating Public Housing and Section 8 families to public and private resources
to increase their earned income and financial empowerment, reduce or eliminate
the need for welfare assistance, and make progress toward economic
independence and self-sufficiency. Caseworkers coordinate support services
offered by non-profit, governmental, and educational community partners; provide
case planning and coordination, supportive counseling and referral and advocacy;
assist with access to educational resources, vocational training and employment
opportunities; and assist with budgeting, homeownership preparation, and
transportation. Successful participants engage in training, improve employment
outcomes, save money, and buy a home. In the past year, 17 residents graduated
from the FSS program.

The grant application was due on Oct. 7, 2022. If authorization is denied, the grant


Page 91

application will be rescinded or amended.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. This grant does not require matching
funds.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.




Page 92



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Enter into Contract with St. Joseph the Worker (Ordinance S-49060)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with St. Joseph the Worker (SJW) for the Workforce Villages Program which provides
housing and support services to employed individuals experiencing homelessness to
help end their homelessness without housing voucher assistance. The total value of
the contract will not exceed $2 million. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. Funding is available from the City’s allocation
of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA).

Summary
In 2020, SJW’s Workforce Villages program was established in response to the COVID
-19 pandemic and operates in various scattered sites in the Phoenix area. The
program provides housing and support services to employed individuals experiencing
homelessness to assist in ending their homelessness without housing voucher
assistance. Individuals successfully complete the program by securing housing and
being responsible for rent on their own. The City included this program in the ARPA
Second Tranche Strategic Plan in an effort to provide a unique housing program
focusing on individuals experiencing homelessness who are employed and able to end
their homelessness with intense case management services, financial management
planning, and life skills training. The program requires the participant to have a full-
time job, earn at least $15 per hour, work a minimum of 35 hours per week, save 80
percent of their net income, live off the remaining 20 percent, meet weekly with their
Workforce Villages Specialist, provide copies of their pay stubs and savings account
balances, and complete assignments, a credit report, background check, and budget.

Contract Term
The term of the contract will begin on or about Oct. 1, 2022, and end on Dec. 29, 2024.

Financial Impact
The total value of the contract will not exceed $2 million. Funding is available from
ARPA. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.

Page 93



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Amend 2021-22 Community Development Block Grant Public Facility
Subrecipient Agreements (Ordinance S-49078)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the 2021-22
Community Development Block Grant Public Facility Contracts with VALLEYLIFE and
ACCEL for an additional eight months through June 30, 2023, and increase the
contract award for VALLEYLIFE from $83,241 to $150,000. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
In September 2021, the City Council approved Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Public Facility grant funding for local non-profits VALLEYLIFE and ACCEL.
CDBG Public Facility funding assists non-profit organizations in expanding services to
support the needs of low- to moderate-income Phoenix residents. Eligible activities
include acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, or Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) improvements to non-profit owned public facilities.

ACCEL provides services to children and adults who have developmental disabilities
and was awarded funding to implement ADA enhancements at the 10251 N. 35th Ave.,
Phoenix, location. VALLEYLIFE provides services to individuals with disabilities to
enhance their quality of life and was awarded funding to build a prep kitchen to
prepare healthy meals at the 1142 W. Hatcher Rd., Phoenix location.

Construction costs have increased considerably since the original project budget for
VALLEYLIFE was submitted in October 2021. To complete the project, VALLEYLIFE
has requested a contract award increase from $83,241 to $150,000. Sufficient CDBG
funding exists to accommodate the request.

The requested contract extensions are necessary to allow the non-profit agencies time
to complete their FY 2021-22 CDBG funded projects. VALLEYLIFE and ACCEL
requested additional time due to on-site operational interruptions as a result of the
Coronavirus pandemic. The Public Facility projects require extensions due to delays at
various points during their project schedule. The additional time will enable these
agencies to continue to provide critical services to vulnerable residents.



Page 94

Contract Term
The original contract terms were Sept. 8, 2021, through Oct. 31, 2022. If this item is
approved, the term of each contract will be extended through June 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. Contract award for VALLEYLIFE will increase
from $83,241 to $150,000. Contracts are funded by the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) CDBG funds. Sufficient CDBG funding exists to
accommodate the request.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The 2021-22 CDBG Public Facility Subrecipient contract awards was approved by the

Location
Council Districts: 1 and 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.




Page 95



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Japanese Friendship Garden Pump and Filter Maintenance Contract - EXC 23-
020 Request for Award (Ordinance S-49058)

Request to authorize the City Manager or his designee to enter into a contract with
Intelligent Control Network, LLC, dba GMI Pump Systems to provide Japanese
Friendship Garden Pump and Filter Maintenance for the Parks and Recreation
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $500,000.

Summary
This contract will provide maintenance and ensure operations of the pump and filter
systems at the Japanese Friendship Garden which contains a one-acre koi pond that
is a replica of the Japanese Friendship Garden in Himeji, Japan, Phoenix's sister city.
The previous system was approximately 15 years old and failing, causing loss of
revenue to the non-profit operators and environmental concern for the health of the
1,200 koi that live in the pond. Both the pumps and the ozone need to work in tandem
to keep the water aerated and clear and provide a healthy environment for the koi. It is
necessary to have contracted maintenance by experts that can keep this system
running efficiently for the enjoyment of the thousands of visitors to the Japanese
Friendship Garden.

Procurement Information
In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Special Circumstances
Without Competition. The computer system to coordinate the pumps, ozone, cooling
systems and alarms is a proprietary system installed by GMI Pump Systems. It is
critical that these complex, proprietary systems are maintained and operated by the
same company that installed the overall system.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Oct. 17, 2022, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $500,000 for the five-year aggregate


Page 96

term. Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's budget.

Location
Japanese Friendship Garden, 1125 N. Third Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85003
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.




Page 97



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Sell City-Owned Property Located at 4815 S. 67th Ave. to
Arizona Department of Transportation for State Route 30 (Ordinance S-49063)

Request to authorize the City Manager or his designee to sell City-owned property
located at 4815 S. 67th Ave. to the Arizona Department of Transportation for State
Route 30. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to
this item.

Summary
The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) requires the property for
construction of the proposed State Route 30 which will extend between Loop 202 and
Loop 303 through southwest Phoenix, Avondale and Goodyear. The property is
approximately 85.98 acres (net) of vacant land and was leased for sand and gravel
operations from January 2006 through February 2021. Most of the site is a sand and
gravel pit that cannot be developed without significant fill.

Financial Impact
Revenue of $1,505,220 is reflective of appraised value. Proceeds from the sale of this
property will be used for Parks and Recreation projects in Council District 7.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On Sept. 7, 2022, a public hearing was held to amend the Zoning District Map of the
Rezoning Application Z-31-22-7 and rezone the site from S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residential District) to C-2 (Intermediate Commercial District) to allow commercial
uses. Rezoning stipulations included elements that will help activate the Rio Salado
frontage and promote pedestrian activity, including recreation. The item was adopted
by City Council (Ordinance G-7011).

Location
4815 S. 67th Ave., identified by Maricopa County Assessor parcel number 104-66-001.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation and Finance departments.

Page 98



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Phoenix
and Arizona State University for the Development of the Health Solutions Center
at the Phoenix Biosciences Core (Ordinance S-49043)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the
Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona State University (ASU), to extend and
modify certain business terms. There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of
this action.

Summary
On May 10, 2016, City Council authorized an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) (City
Contract No. 142599) with ASU for the development of approximately 1.5 million
square feet of biomedical facilities at the Phoenix Biosciences Core (PBC).
Subsequently, the City and ASU entered into a ground lease (City Contract No.
149060) for Phase 1 of the development of the Health Solutions Center, now called
850 PBC and which completed construction December 2020. Since the agreements
were originally envisioned, the campus and development partnerships have grown. As
a result of the growth and better understanding of changing market conditions, certain
contract terms are no longer in the best interest of the parties or the PBC.

As it exists today, the IGA states that ASU shall, within 180 days of receiving the
certificate of occupancy for the prior phase, issue a notification exercising their option
to develop the next phase of the development and must complete the design and
construction of the subsequent phase no later than thirty months following the prior
phase completion. This amendment will replace the existing timeline requirements with
updated timing as follows:
· No later than 180 days from prior phase completion, ASU and the City will meet to
determine phasing schedule for completion of subsequent phase.
· ASU and the City shall use commercially reasonable efforts to enter into the
subsequent phase lease within 24 months, but no later than 36 months from the
prior phase completion.
· Completion of subsequent phase shall occur no later than 36 months from
execution of subsequent phase lease.




Page 99

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of this action.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Economic Development and Equity Subcommittee recommended approval of this
item on September 28, 2022. Ordinance S-41736 authorizing the IGA with ASU was
passed by the City Council on May 19, 2015. Ordinance S-43332 authorizing the first
amendment to the IGA was passed by the City Council on March 22, 2017.

Location
Approximately four blocks bounded by 4th and 6th streets and Garfield and Fillmore
streets.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Community
and Economic Development Department.




Page 100



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Resolution to Declare 2023 NFL Super Bowl Activities in Downtown Phoenix as
Special Promotional Events (Resolution 22073)

Request City Council to supersede Resolution 21987 by approving a new Resolution
declaring that for the three-week period before the National Football League (NFL)
Super Bowl LVII game on Sunday, February 12, 2023, and for one week after, all
Official NFL Events and other NFL and Arizona Super Bowl Host Committee-
sanctioned activities that are held in the Special Promotional and Civic Event Area
(map attached) will be considered special promotional and civic events for the
purposes of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. The new Resolution adjusts the Special
Promotional and Civic Event Area to better align with the Super Bowl related activities.

Summary
It is anticipated that certain NFL game-related activities will take place in downtown
Phoenix in the weeks prior to and after the game. These events and activities will bring
significant revenue and media exposure to the City of Phoenix during the event period.
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 705 specifies requirements for temporary signs.
By declaring the NFL and Arizona Super Bowl Host Committee-sanctioned activities as
special promotional and civic events, this Resolution allows the NFL, NFL-approved
sponsors, and Arizona Super Bowl Host Committee to advertise official events in the
Promotional and Civic Event Area by use of signs, banners, and similar devices. This
action will not impact any existing permitted permanent signs in downtown. This
declaration will restrict all temporary signage within the Special Promotional and Civic
Event Area that has not been authorized by the NFL and/or Arizona Super Bowl Host
Committee during the above-mentioned time period in order to support NFL event-
related activities. The new Resolution supersedes the prior Special Promotional
Events Resolution (Resolution 21987) by adopting a new Resolution with an adjusted
Special Promotional and Civic Event Area that better aligns with the Super Bowl
related activities.

Location
McDowell Road to Lincoln Street, 7th Avenue to 7th Street (includes properties
adjacent to 7th Ave on the west and adjacent to 7th Street on the east)
Council Districts: 4, 7, 8



Page 101

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This resolution supersedes Resolution 21987 approved by the City Council on Jan. 26,
2022.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Inger Erickson and Alan Stephenson,
the Phoenix Convention Center Department, and the Planning and Development
Department.




Page 102
Special Promotional and Civic Event Area
OAK ST
MONTE VISTA RD




ALVARADO RD
3RD ST




12TH ST
MCDOWELL RD




§
¨
¦



ROOSEVELT ST
G
R
A
N
D
AV

15TH AVE 10TH AVE
E




VAN BUREN ST 11TH ST




Path: M:\Projects\Special_Promotional_and_Civic_Event_Area\Special_Promotional_and_Civic_Event_Area.aprx
WASHINGTON ST



16TH AVE
JEFFERSON ST




LINCOLN ST

7TH ST
GRANT ST



7TH AVE CENTRAL AVE
Special Promotional
and Civic Event BUCKEYE RD
Area
Freeways
City Parcel



¯
Miles
0 0.13 0.25 0.5 0.75

Page 103



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Donation from Phoenix Fire Foundation for Phoenix Fire Department Baby Shots
Immunization Program (Ordinance S-49041)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept a donation of $5,000
from the Phoenix Fire Foundation to support the Phoenix Fire Department's Baby
Shots Immunization Program. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to
accept, and for the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this donation. If not
approved, the donation would be declined.

Summary
The Phoenix Fire Department Baby Shots Immunization Program provides free
vaccinations to children who are eligible under the federally funded Vaccine for
Children's Program, which provides vaccines at no cost to children who might not
otherwise be vaccinated because of an inability to pay. The donation from the Phoenix
Fire Foundation will help fund the costs of equipment, promotional materials, electronic
equipment and associated two-year service plans, overtime event staffing, and related
travel and training.

The Phoenix Fire Foundation is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization. The Foundation is
committed to supporting the Phoenix Fire Department, and other public safety
agencies in metro Phoenix, in their daily efforts to save lives and protect families and
communities.

Contract Term
There is no contract term associated with this donation.

Financial Impact
This donation does not require any matching funds. The funds will be used in
accordance with City policies.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.




Page 104



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Agreement with Harvard Kennedy School for Further Assistance to the
Community Assistance Program (Ordinance S-49074)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve an agreement with
Harvard Kennedy School to participate in the Government Performance Lab technical
assistance program and provide continued support to the Community Assistance
Program (CAP) for up to an additional two years. Further request an exemption from
the indemnification prohibition set forth in the Phoenix City Code section 42-18 to allow
for mutual indemnification.

Summary
On June 16, 2021, City Council approved $15 million to expand the City's Community
Assistance Program. The CAP expansion focuses on utilizing alternative 9-1-1
emergency response teams to respond to 9-1-1 calls in lieu of traditional law
enforcement. Over the past year, the Harvard Kennedy School has helped the City
develop methods to reduce reliance on traditional law enforcement and connected
residents with mental and behavioral health services, substance use treatment, and
other forms of support.

With approval of this agreement, Harvard Kennedy School will be able to provide
further input on topics including select program policies and procedures, training
development, key performance metrics and training materials. Harvard Kennedy
School is able to pass along knowledge and best practices to Phoenix for
consideration and inclusion in Phoenix CAP operations as they benefit from similar
information from other jurisdictions across the nation including: Durham, N.C.; Harris
County, Texas; Long Beach, Calif.; and Philadelphia, Pa.

Staff requests a waiver of Phoenix City Code 42-18 to allow for mutual indemnification
for both parties.

Contract Term
The term of this agreement is for up to two years based on the mutual agreement
between the City of Phoenix and Harvard Kennedy School.




Page 105

Financial Impact
The City shall have no responsibility for compensation or employee benefits for any
individual from the Harvard Government Performance Lab with respect to any work
done pursuant to this agreement. There is no cost to the City.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, and the Fire Department.




Page 106



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data Computer System - RFP 08-0603 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-49049)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the amendment to
Contract 125890 with Versaterm Public Safety, Inc. for the purchase of maintenance to
the City's Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Mobile Data Computer System, to
extend the contract term. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $692,608.32.

Summary
The contract provides ongoing maintenance for the CAD/911 System and is
proprietary to Versaterm. Maintenance support is crucial to resolving system issues in
a timely manner with few or no interruptions. In addition to collecting calls for service
and dispatching, the system is integrated with the Department of Public Safety for
vehicle and suspect information, accessing various state and national criminal justice
networks to provide suspect or vehicle information to officers. The continued
maintenance of the department's CAD/911 System, is critical to ensure there are no
interruptions to dispatchers that utilize the system to prioritize and record incident calls,
identify the status and location of first responders, and effectively dispatch priority calls
for service.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract will be extended through June 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $692,608.32 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $13,431,231. Funds are available in the Police Department’s
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data Computer System - Contract 125890


Page 107

(Ordinance S-36018) on April 8, 2009;
· Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data Computer System - Contract 125890
(Ordinance S-38805) on May 16, 2012;
· Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data Computer System - Contract 125890
(Ordinance S-39735) on April 3, 2013;
· Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data Computer System - Contract 125890
(Ordinance S-40717) on April 2, 2014;
· Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data Computer System - Contract 125890
(Ordinance S-40837-AU) on May 28, 2014;
· Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data Computer System - Contract 125890
(Ordinance S-41972-F) on Aug. 26, 2015;
· Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data Computer System - Contract 125890
(Ordinance S-42565-F) on June 1, 2016;
· Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data Computer System - Contract 125890
(Ordinance S-42892-J) on Oct. 5, 2016;
· Computer Aided Dispatch and Mobile Data Computer System - Contract 125890
(Ordinance S-43732) on June 28, 2017.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.




Page 108



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Airport Bus Fleet Operations & Maintenance Award (Ordinance S-49037)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Transdev Services, Inc. for bus contingency services to operate and maintain City-
owned buses and to provide timely and reliable passenger transportation between the
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport's Rental Car Center and Airport terminals on
an as-needed basis. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $6,506,885.

Summary
Transdev Services, Inc. will operate and maintain six Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport (Airport) passenger buses on a contingency basis following completion of the
PHX Sky Train (Sky Train) Stage Two project. Transdev Services, Inc. will also
operate and maintain six COBUS vehicles for routine airfield operations including
remote aircraft parking, and airfield emergencies. The Sky Train is considered a must-
ride system because it connects to the Rental Car Center, terminals, economy parking
structures, and the City's Metro light rail system. Operation and regular maintenance
are required for the City-owned bus fleet to support and facilitate the timely movement
of passengers during an emergency activation of the Airport's contingency plan and in
the event of a Sky Train interruption or outage.

Procurement Information
In accordance with A.R. 3.10, standard competition was waived after the issuance of a
Request For Information (RFI) in March 2021 and a Request For Proposals (RFP) in
November 2021. There was one respondent for each solicitation and the cost proposal
exceeded scope and funding availability. A Determination Memo was authorized to
enter into direct negotiations with incumbent Transdev Services, Inc. to provide bus-
contingency services on an as-needed basis to meet the critical operational needs of
the Airport.

Contract Term
The term of the contract will commence on the day following the expiration or
termination of the extended Transdev Services, Inc. Airport Shuttle Bus Services
Contract 125318 or the day following the expiration of the final extension period ending
March 31, 2023. The new contract will be for an aggregate five-year term with no
options to extend.

Page 109

Financial Impact
The aggregate value will not exceed $6,506,885 for the five-year aggregate contract
term. Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended the RFI for approval on Feb. 18,
2021 by a vote of 6-0.
Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended the RFI for
approval on March 3, 2021 by a vote of 4-0.
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended award for approval on Sept. 15,
2022 by a vote of 6-0.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E Buckeye Road.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 110



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Bus Contingency Contract - RFQu 22-023 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-
49042)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with Via
Adventures, Inc.; Jet Limousines & Transportation, LLC; Tour West America, Inc.; and
Industrial Bus Lines, Inc. to provide bus contingency services to transport customers
between Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Airport) facilities and other events
as needed for the Aviation Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed
$172,000 for the five-year aggregate contract terms.

Summary
The contracts will provide qualified operators of medium and large shuttle buses,
motorcoach buses, and driver resources to assist the Aviation Department in
transporting customers between Airport facilities on an as-needed basis. The
contracted bus and charter providers will deliver qualified bus drivers and bus
resources on an as-needed basis to support the Aviation Department’s PHX Sky Train
contingency plans and other Airport events requiring these resources.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications 22-023 - Bus Contingency procurement was processed in
accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List
(QVL).

Four offerors submitted qualifications and were deemed to be responsive and
responsible. The Procurement Officer evaluated all offers as pass-fail for the following
minimum qualification criteria:

· Offerors must have a minimum of one year of experience within the last three years
providing public and/or commercial transportation services that include driver
resources.
· Offerors must have a branch office or operating facility located within Maricopa
County, Arizona and the identified point of contact must be stationed in this local
office.
· Offerors must operate buses with a minimum passenger seat capacity of 14 seats


Page 111

for transportation not requiring a commercial driver’s license (CDL) and/or;
· Offerors must operate buses with seat capacity greater than 14 requiring CDL
credentials.

The following offerors met the minimum qualification criteria and are being
recommended for placement on the QVL:

· Via Adventures, Inc.
· Jet Limousines & Transportation, LLC
· Tour West America, Inc.
· Industrial Bus Lines, Inc.

Contract Term
The terms of the contracts will begin on or about Nov. 1, 2022 for an initial three-year
term, with two one-year options to extend for a five-year aggregate contract term if all
options are exercised.

Financial Impact
The contract value will not exceed $172,000 for the five-year aggregate contract term.
Funding is available in the Aviation Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval of this item on Aug. 18,
2022 by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 112



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aviation Department Construction Inspection Services (Ordinance S-49044)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with TRACE Consulting, LLC and Consultant Engineering, Inc., to provide
construction inspection services for the Aviation Department. Further request to
authorize execution of amendments to the agreements as necessary within the
Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for services will not exceed
$12.5 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing construction inspection
services for Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Phoenix Goodyear Airport, and
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport that include, but are not limited to: serve as a City
representative on construction projects assigned to landside and/or airside on an as-
needed basis; inspect and monitor for compliance; observe, record, and review
performance tests; prepare daily reports, test results, and photo records; perform other
inspection services as needed; and will work closely with and under the direction of the
Aviation Construction Inspection Supervisor.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.


Page 113

section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Four firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firms
Rank 1: TRACE Consulting, LLC
Rank 2: Consultant Engineering, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 3: Dibble CM, LLC
Rank 4: Ritoch-Powell & Associates, an Ardurra Company

Contract Term
The term of each agreement is up to three years from the issuance of the Notice to
Proceed, with the option to extend for two additional years, or up to $6,250,000,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior
to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the
termination of the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of
the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for each of the consultants will not exceed $6,250,000, including
all sub consultant and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services will not exceed
$12.5 million.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department’s Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 2485 E. Buckeye Road.
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road.
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road., Goodyear, Ariz.
Council Districts: 2, 8, and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Aviation
Department, and the City Engineer.



Page 114



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aviation Deicing Trailer- Request for Award (Ordinance S-49064)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to complete a one-time
purchase with Wausau Equipment Company, Inc. (Wausau), for a TAD Series trailer
mounted runway deicer to support Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport's (PHX)
Extreme Weather Program for the Aviation Department. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of this
request will not exceed $160,000.

Summary
PHX provides critical infrastructure for both domestic and international airlines and
unpredictable weather incidents can significantly interrupt operations. Due to the
effects of climate change and unpredictable climate patterns, PHX has developed the
Extreme Weather Program in order to more efficiently respond to potential extreme
winter weather conditions. The purchase price also includes staff training and a two-
year equipment warranty.

Procurement Information
PHX recently issued a total of two Invitations for Bids, however the bids were
cancelled due to the bidders' inability to meet the equipment specifications and
delivery time frame respectively. Wausau is the only vendor that can manufacture and
deliver the deicing trailer with manual booms within PHX requested timeline to support
Super Bowl operations.

In accordance with AR 3.10, standard competition was waived as a result of an
approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Special Circumstances
Without Competition-One Time Contract-Due to Time Restrictions.

Contract Term
A one-time purchase order (PO) will be issued upon Council approval.

Financial Impact
The one-time PO value will not exceed $160,000.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's budget.


Page 115


Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E Buckeye Road, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 116



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendment to Executive Hangar Lease 152807 with Salt River Project at
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Ordinance S-49070)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Executive Hangar
Lease152807 with Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District
(SRP) to add executive hangar 10 to the premises at Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport.

Summary
On March 1, 2020 SRP entered into Executive Hangar Lease 152807 for executive
hangar 11. The term for Executive Hangar Lease 152807 terminates on Feb. 29, 2024.
SRP has purchased a new aircraft and requires additional space and SRP is
requesting to lease executive hangar 10 to store the additional aircraft by amending
the premises.

Contract Term
This amendment will add executive hangar 10 to the premises of Executive Hangar
Lease 152807, which is scheduled to expire on Feb. 29, 2024. All other terms and
conditions of the lease will remain the same.

Financial Impact
Rent for this amendment will increase approximately $30,364.32 per year ($2,530.36
per month). Rent will be adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI)
for Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale. Expected occupancy will be 15 months total. The total
estimated revenue will be $37,955.40.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Executive Hangar Lease 152807 (Ordinance S-46072) on October 2, 2019

The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended this item for approval on
September 15, 2022, by a vote of 6-0.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 2527 E. Air Lane, Phoenix, Arizona 85034


Page 117

Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 118



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fairmount Corporation Real Estate and Investments Ground Lease (Ordinance S
-49072)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a ground lease
with Fairmount Corp. Real Estate and Investments for Aviation Department owned
parcel at 1520 East Apache St. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to
accept all funds related to the ground lease.

Summary
Fairmount Corp. Real Estate and Investments (Fairmount) owns land west of Phoenix
Sky Harbor International Airport that envelops the Aviation Department owned parcel
at 1520 East Apache St. on three sides. Fairmount wishes to lease approximately
6,893 square feet of land on this parcel to increase available automobile parking for
their property.

Contract Term
The term of the lease will be three years from the date of execution. Provisions of the
contract will include two one-year options to extend the term at the sole discretion of
the Aviation Director.

Financial Impact
Annual rent for the first year of the term will be $7,238. Rent will be annually adjusted
according to the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Consumer Price Index. Total anticipated
revenue, if all options are exercised, is approximately $36,190.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was approved by the Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board on September 15,
2022 by a vote of 6-0.

Location
1520 East Apache St.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.

Page 119



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Westwind School of Aeronautics, Phoenix, LLC Lease Amendment (Ordinance S-
49073)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Westwind School of
Aeronautics, Phoenix, LLC (Westwind) Lease 145025 to add additional land for two
parking lots at Phoenix Goodyear Airport (GYR).

Summary
Westwind operates a pilot training facility at GYR. Westwind is increasing the number
of students enrolled in their flight training program and requires additional automobile
parking to accommodate more students. The additional parking consists of
approximately 91,626 square feet and will be located on two vacant lots that are
contiguous with the Westwind campus.

Contract Term
The amendment will add land for the parking lots to Westwind Lease 145025 for the
remaining term of the lease which expires on Feb. 29, 2032. A provision of the lease
includes one five-year option to extend the term to Feb. 28, 2037 at the sole discretion
of the Aviation Director.

Financial Impact
Annual rent for the land for the parking lots for the first year will be $29,320, and will
increase annually per the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Consumer Price Index. Total
anticipated revenue, if the option is exercised, is approximately $439,800.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Lease 145025 (Ordinance S-43184) on Jan. 25, 2017.
This item was approved by the Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board on Sept. 15, 2022 by
a vote of 6-0.

Location
Phoenix Goodyear Airport, 1658 South Litchfield Road, Goodyear, Ariz.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.

Page 120



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Materials Recovery Facility Operations and Materials Marketing - Requirements
Contract - RFP 23-SW-006 (Ordinance S-49059)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Balcones Resources, Inc. to provide the Public Works Department with operation
and maintenance of the North Gateway and the 27th Avenue Material Recovery
Facilities (MRFs) and marketing of recovered materials for a five-year period
commencing on or about Feb. 1, 2023, for North Gateway and Sept. 1, 2023, for 27th
Avenue. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds and City
Treasurer to accept all funds related to this agreement over the life of the contract.

Summary
The Contractor’s obligation will be to operate the City’s North Gateway and 27th
Avenue MRFs. This includes processing single stream recycling to meet market
specifications and creating economic value by marketing, selling, and shipping the
recyclable material (commodities) to various markets. Currently, approximately
130,000 tons of recyclables are processed annually. The material processed at these
sites are received from the City’s curbside recycling program, City facilities and other
municipalities. The commodities include aluminum, steel cans, various plastics, mixed
glass, cardboard, and paper. The contractor will also maintain the MRF equipment and
provide all staffing, materials, supplies, and equipment required of MRF operations.

Procurement Information
Request for Proposal (RFP) 23-SW-006 was conducted in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10. Five proposals were received on July 13, 2022. The
offers were evaluated by a panel that included representation from the Public Works
Department, City of Tucson, and City of Glendale. The offers were evaluated based on
criteria set forth in the RFP with 1,000 maximum points possible.

Allied Waste Systems, Inc., Republic Services: 736 points
Balcones Resources, Inc.: 873 points
CellMark, Inc.: 735 points
GFL Environmental/Transit Waste, LLC: 811 points
Recology, Inc.: 827 points



Page 121

The evaluation panel recommends the offer from Balcones Resources, Inc. to be
accepted as the responsive and responsible offer with the highest point value
received.

Contract Term
The term of this contract is for five years and will commence on or about Feb. 1, 2023,
for North Gateway and Sept. 1, 2023, for 27th Avenue. Provisions of the contract
include an option to extend the term up to five years, to be taken in one-year
increments, which may be exercised by the City Manager or designee.

Financial Impact
The estimated operating cost over the 10-year contract is approximately $158,903,000
based on historical trends and highest forecasted processing rate, and it also assumes
tonnage growth and CPI adjustments. Revenue will be generated by the sale of
commodities, which will fluctuate depending on market conditions. Actual usage, fees,
and revenues from this contract may be higher or lower depending on recycling
tonnage collected and commodities markets.

Funding is available in the Public Works Department's budget.

Location
North Gateway MRF - 30205 N. Black Canyon Highway
27th Avenue MRF - 3060 S. 27th Ave.
Council Districts: 2 and 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.




Page 122



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fire Alarm - Job Order Contracting Services Contracts (Ordinance S-49045)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate master
agreements with four contractors to provide Fire Alarm Job Order Contracting Services
for departments citywide. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreements as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The total fee for services will not exceed $32 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical; water; sewer; natural gas; telecommunications; cable
television; railroads; and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in
the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of
liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18.
This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The State of Arizona (State) has completed a procurement process to select four Job
Order Contractors (JOC) to provide Fire Alarm Services throughout the Phoenix Area.
The City of Phoenix (City) would like to enter into a cooperative use agreement to
utilize the solicitation. The four contractors are 1. Hiller Companies, Inc. dba American
Fire Equipment Sales & Service Corporation, 2. CopperState Fire Protection, 3.
Firetrol Protection Systems, Inc., and 4. Atlas Fire Company, LLC.

The Contractors’ services will be used on an as-needed basis and include, but are not
limited to: assessment, design, procurement and installation of new
intelligent/addressable fire alarm systems; and replacing or upgrading existing fire
alarm systems in occupied buildings.

Procurement Information
These cooperative agreements will allow the City to utilize Fire Alarm JOC Services


Page 123

and benefit from rates already negotiated with the contractors, thereby providing a
better cost for construction services to the City.

Contract Term
The term of each master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $8 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The master agreement value for each of the JOC contractors will not exceed $8
million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs. The total fee for services
will not exceed $32 million.

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute job order
agreements performed under these master agreements for up to $2 million each. In no
event will any job order agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to
increase the limit.

Funding is available in the citywide departments' Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 124



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Transit Department Light Rail Extension Construction Administration and
Inspection On-Call Services for Calendar Years 2023-27 (Ordinance S-49050)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with eight selected consultants, as identified in Attachment A, to provide
Construction Administration and Inspection On-Call services for multiple light rail
extension projects. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreements as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Concurrent with these requests, the City is separately seeking authority under another
agenda item to enter into consultant agreements to provide Materials Testing On-Call
services for multiple light rail extension projects in Calendar Years 2023-27. The total
fee for On-Call services from the combination of all these consultant agreements for
Materials Testing and Construction Administration and Inspection will not exceed $55
million in aggregate.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
deemed necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads, and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion, within the documents pertaining to this transaction, of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide Construction Administration and Inspection
services on an as-needed basis for the following light rail extensions: Light Rail South
Central Extension/Downtown Hub; Light Rail Northwest Extension Phase II; and future
location, Capitol Extension. Phoenix may include additional future light rail extensions
for these services.


Page 125


The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing Construction Administration
and Inspection services that include, but are not limited to: representation on behalf of
the City of Phoenix for full range of civil and water inspection services during the
construction phase to ensure compliance with City of Phoenix, Maricopa County and
Valley Metro standards, policies and guidelines. Inspections will include roadway, alley,
water, sewer, dry utilities, landscape and irrigation, irrigation facilities, storm drain,
retentions, embankments, earthwork, trenching, grading, soil treatments, masonry,
structural steel, bridge/structures, sidewalk, ADA ramps, curb and gutter, driveways,
and temporary traffic control for compliance to applicable standards.

Current locations are:
· South Central Extension/Downtown Hub; approximately 5.5 miles of new guideway
that will provide a mass transit option for residences, businesses and visitors to gain
access to and from the South-Central community.
· Northwest Extension Phase II; approximately 1.5 miles of new guideway that will
extend the light rail west, bridging the gap between the east and west valley.

Future locations are:
· Capitol Extension; approximately 1.4 miles of new guideway that will extend the
light rail west to the Arizona State Capitol.
· Future light rail extensions may be identified and included in services.

This project may utilize federal funds and is subject to the requirements of 49 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 26, the U.S. Department of Transportation
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program, and FTA Circular 4220.1F.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Twelve firms submitted proposals
and are listed in Attachment A, which also identifies the eight selected firms.

Contract Term
The agreements will begin on or about Nov. 1, 2022 with each having a term of up to
five years. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end
of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination
of the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.



Page 126

Financial Impact
The cost for all agreements of the Construction Administration and Inspection On-Call
consultants, combined with the cost for all agreements of the Material Testing On-Call
consultants that the City is concurrently seeking authority to enter by a separate
agenda item, will not exceed $55 million in aggregate, including all subconsultant and
reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Public Transit Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve funding
availability prior to issuance of any on-call task order of $100,000 or more. Payments
may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may
extend past the agreement termination.

Location
Council Districts: 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Public Transit
Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 127
ATTACHMENT A


Selected Firms
Rank 1: Consultant Engineering, Inc.
Rank 2: Tristar Engineering & Management, Inc.
Rank 3: Infenix, LLC
Rank 4: Consor Engineers, LLC
Rank 5: WSP USA Inc.
Rank 6: Wood, Patel & Associates, Inc.
Rank 7: Trace Consulting, LLC
Rank 8: Entellus, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 9: PGH Wong Engineering, Inc.
Rank 10: Quality Testing, L.L.C.
Rank 11: Cass Cura, LLC
Rank 12: 4Leaf, Inc.




Page 128



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Transit Department Light Rail Extension Materials Testing On-Call
Services for Calendar Years 2023-27 (Ordinance S-49051)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with eight selected consultants, as identified in Attachment A, to provide
Materials Testing On-Call services for multiple light rail extension projects. Further
request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreements as necessary within
the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Concurrent with these requests, the City is separately seeking authority under another
agenda item to enter into consultant agreements to provide Construction
Administration and Inspection On-Call services for multiple light rail extension projects
in Calendar Years 2023-27. The total fee for On-Call services from the combination of
all these consultant agreements for Materials Testing and Construction Administration
and Inspection will not exceed $55 million in aggregate.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
deemed necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to then
development, design, and construction of the project Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads, and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion, within the documents pertaining to this transaction, of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide Materials Testing services on an as-needed
basis for the following light rail extensions: Light Rail South Central
Extension/Downtown Hub; Light Rail Northwest Extension Phase II; and future
location, Capitol Extension. Phoenix may include additional future light rail extensions
for these services.


Page 129


The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing Materials Testing services
that include, but are not limited to: geotechnical investigations, geotechnical and
materials testing; laboratory and field testing of soil, concrete and asphalt; plant
inspections; analyses and preparation of reports; and daily oversight to ensure
compliance with City of Phoenix, Maricopa County and Valley Metro standards,
policies and guidelines.

Materials field testing will include roadway, alley, water, sewer, dry utilities, landscape
and irrigation, irrigation facilities, storm drain, retentions, embankments, earthwork,
trenching, grading, soil treatments, masonry, structural steel, bridge/structures,
sidewalk, ADA ramps, curb and gutter and driveways for compliance with standard
details, specifications and approved plans.

Current locations are:
· South Central Extension/Downtown Hub; approximately 5.5 miles of new guideway
that will provide a mass transit option for residences, businesses and visitors to gain
access to and from the South-Central community.
· Northwest Extension Phase II; approximately 1.5 miles of new guideway that will
extend the light rail west, bridging the gap between the east and west valley.

Future locations are:
· Capitol Extension; approximately 1.4 miles of new guideway that will extend the
light rail west to the Arizona State Capitol.
· Future light rail extensions may be identified and included in services.

This project may utilize federal funds and is subject to the requirements of 49 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 26, the U.S. Department of Transportation
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program, and FTA Circular 4220.1F.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Thirteen firms submitted
proposals and are listed in Attachment A.

Contract Term
The term of each agreement will begin on or about Nov. 1, 2022 and will have a term
of up to five years. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to


Page 130

the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the
termination of the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of
the term.

Financial Impact
The cost for all agreements of the Material Testing On-Call consultants, combined with
the cost for all agreements of the Construction Administration and Inspection On-Call
consultants that the City is concurrently seeking authority to enter by a separate
agenda item, will not exceed $55 million in aggregate, including all subconsultant and
reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Public Transit Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve funding
availability prior to issuance of any on-call task order of $100,000 or more. Payments
may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may
extend past the agreement termination.

Location
Council Districts: 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Public Transit
Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 131
ATTACHMENT A


Selected Firms
Rank 1: Quality Testing, L.L.C.
Rank 2: Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
Rank 3: Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences
Consultants Inc.
Rank 4: Alta CMTI, LLC dba Alta Arizona
Rank 5: Speedie & Associates, LLC
Rank 6: Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Rank 7: Western Technologies, Inc.
Rank 8: Smith & Annala Engineering Co.

Additional Proposers
Rank 9: ACS Services L.L.C.
Rank 10: Hoque & Associates, Inc.
Rank 11: Olsson, Inc.
Rank 12: Professional Service Industries, Inc.
Rank 13: Fenagh LLC dba Fenagh Engineering and Testing




Page 132



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Citywide Engineering On-Call Services for Calendar Years 2023-24 (Ordinance S-
49068)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with the 60 consultants on Attachment A, to provide Engineering On-Call
services citywide. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreements as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The total fee for services will not exceed $72 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing On-Call Engineering services
that include, but are not limited to: studies, plan review, special inspections,
programming, master plans, design, construction document development (plans,
specifications and cost estimates), and construction administration and inspection
services.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. 112 firms submitted proposals
and are listed in Attachment A.


Page 133


Contract Term
The term of each agreement will begin on or about Nov. 1, 2022 with a term of up to
two years or up to $1.2 million, whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and
incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the
parties, and work may extend past the termination of the agreement. No additional
changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement values for each of the On-Call consultants will not exceed $1.2 million,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services will not
exceed $72 million.

Funding is available in the citywide departments' Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any On-Call task order of $100,000 or more.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 134
ATTACHMENT A


Complete Streets Three Firms Selected
Rank 1: Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
Rank 2: Toole Design Group, LLC
Rank 3: Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc.

Construction Project Management Three Firms Selected
Rank 1: Consultant Engineering, Inc.
Rank 2: Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc.
Rank 3: Ardurra, Inc.

Data Science One Firm Selected
Rank 1: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.

Electrical Two Firms Selected
Rank 1: Affiliated Engineers, Inc.
Rank 2: CR Engineers, Inc.

Energy Two Firms Selected
Rank 1: Wendel WD Architecture, Engineering, Surveying & Landscape
Architecture, PC
Rank 2: WHPacific, Inc.

Fire/Life Safety One Firm Selected
Rank 1: Fisher Engineering, Inc.

General Civil Fifteen Firms Selected
Rank 1: Entellus, Inc.
Rank 2: Dibble & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. dba Dibble
Rank 3: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Rank 4: AZTEC Engineering Group, Inc.
Rank 5: Gannett Fleming, Inc.
Rank 6: Engineering Alliance, Inc.
Rank 7: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Rank 8: Olsson, Inc.
Rank 9: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Rank 10: Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Rank 11: Ethos Engineering, L.L.C.



Page 135
Rank 12: TRACE Consulting, LLC
Rank 13: Michael Baker International, Inc.
Rank 14: Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects
Rank 15: Sunrise Engineering, Inc.

Landscape Architect Three Firms Selected
Rank 1: J2 Engineering and Environmental Design, LLC
Rank 2: Gavan and Barker, Inc.
Rank 3: Thomas + Crowley, LLC

Mechanical Plumbing Two Firms Selected
Rank 1: LSW Engineers Arizona, Incorporated
Rank 2: GLHN Architects and Engineers, Inc.

Public Information Two Firms Selected
Rank 1: Your Project Marketing and Outreach, LLC
Rank 2: Gunn Communications, Inc.

Structural Four Firms Selected
Rank 1: Caruso Turley Scott, Inc.
Rank 2: Point Engineers, LLC
Rank 3: T.Y. Lin International, Inc.
Rank 4: Advanced Structural Engineering, Inc.

Survey Three Firms Selected
Rank 1: Wood, Patel & Associates, Inc.
Rank 2: CVL Consultants, Inc.
Rank 3: ALTA Survey, LLC dba Alta Arizona

Traffic Engineering Four Firms Selected
Rank 1: Lee Engineering, LLC
Rank 2: Y2K Engineering, LLC
Rank 3: WSP USA Inc.
Rank 4: Y.S. Mantri & Associates, LLC


Water/Wastewater Fifteen Firms Selected
Rank 1: Wilson Engineers, LLC
Rank 2: Carollo Engineers, Inc.
Rank 3: Black & Veatch Corporation



Page 136
Rank 4: Brown and Caldwell, Inc.
Rank 5: EIC Engineers, LLC
Rank 6: Arcadis U.S., Inc.
Rank 7: GHD Inc.
Rank 8: Oz Engineering, LLC
Rank 9: Greeley and Hansen LLC
Rank 10: Project Engineering Consultants, LLC
Rank 11: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Rank 12: Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
Rank 13: Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.
Rank 14: Narasimhan Consulting Services Inc. dba NCS Engineers
Rank 15: Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 61: Avenue Consultants, Inc.
Rank 62: Bernhard TME, LLC
Rank 63: Buehler Engineering, Inc.
Rank 64: C&S Engineers, Inc.
Rank 65: CA Group Arizona, Inc.
Rank 66: Canfield Engineering and Integrations, LLC
Rank 67: CDM Smith, Inc.
Rank 68: CivTech Inc.
Rank 69: EEA Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Rank 70: Electric Energy Systems Engineering, LLC
Rank 71: Environmental Planning Group, Inc.
Rank 72: EPS Group, Inc.
Rank 73: FB3E Consulting Services, LLC
Rank 74: Fenagh, LLC dba Fenagh Engineering and Testing
Rank 75: Garver, LLC
Rank 76: Greenlight Traffic Engineering, LLC
Rank 77: GroTrans Engineering, LLC
Rank 78: Harrington Planning + Design, Inc.
Rank 79: Holistic Engineering and Land Management, Inc.
Rank 80: Horrocks Engineers, Inc.
Rank 81: Huitt-Zollars, Inc.
Rank 82: IMEG Corp.
Rank 83: Jensen Hughes, Inc.
Rank 84: Kennedy Jenks Consultants, Inc.
Rank 85: Kitchell Corporation
Rank 86: Lloyd Consulting Group, LLC dba Lloyd Sports and Engineering



Page 137
Rank 87: Logan Simpson Design, Inc. dba Logan Simpson
Rank 88: Lokahi, LLC
Rank 89: Mark Taylor, Inc.
Rank 90: Martin White and Griffis Structural Engineers, Inc.
Rank 91: McKinstry Essention, LLC
Rank 92: Mead & Hunt, Inc.
Rank 93: Meyer Borgman & Johnson, Inc.
Rank 94: Parsons Transportation Group, Inc.
Rank 95: Pearson Engineering Associates, Incorporated
Rank 96: Primatech, LLC
Rank 97: Professional Service Industries, Inc.
Rank 98: Quantum Integrated Solutions, Inc.
Rank 99: Red Brick Consulting, Inc.
Rank 100: Rick Engineering Company, Inc.
Rank 101: Rider Levett Bucknall, LTD
Rank 102: RVI Planning + Landscape Architecture, Inc.
Rank 103: Sazan Group, Inc.
Rank 104: Spectrum Engineers, Inc.
Rank 105: Stanley Consultants, Inc.
Rank 106: Strand Associates, Inc.
Rank 107: Tetra Tech, Inc.
Rank 108: The RMH Group Inc.
Rank 109: Vanir Construction Management, Inc.
Rank 110: Water Works Engineers, LLC
Rank 111: Westland Resources, Inc.
Rank 112: Wright Engineering Corporation




Page 138



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Street Transportation Department Subsurface Utility Excavation - 2-Step Job
Order Contracting Services - 4108JOC210 (Ordinance S-49075)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate master
agreements with two contractors to provide Subsurface Utility Excavation 2-Step Job
Order Contracting services citywide. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreements as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The total fee for services will not exceed $5 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to, electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The Contractors' services will be used on an as-needed basis to provide Job Order
Contracting (JOC) services for subsurface utility excavation. Additionally, the JOC
contractors will be responsible for fulfilling Small Business Enterprise program
requirements.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a two-step qualifications and price-based selection
process set forth in section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In
accordance with A.R.S. section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release
information on proposals received or the scoring results until an agreement is
awarded. Four firms submitted proposals and are listed below.



Page 139

Selected Firms
Rank 1: AZTEC Engineering Group, Inc.
Rank 2: T2 UES, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 3: Cobb, Fendley & Associates, Inc.
Rank 4: Horrocks Engineers, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of each master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $2.5 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The master agreement value for each of the JOC contractors will not exceed $2.5
million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services
will not exceed $5 million. The value for each job order agreement performed under
this master agreement will be up to $1 million each. In no event will any job order
agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to increase the limit.

Funding is available in the citywide departments' Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 140



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Hot Mix Asphalt Products - RFQu 18-206 - Amendment (Ordinance S-49048)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 147410 with Vulcan Materials Company for the purchase
of hot mix asphalt products for the Street Transportation and Aviation Departments.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $1,025,000.00.

Summary
This contract provides hot mix asphalt products for use by the Street Transportation
and Aviation Departments. Additional funds are required due to a price increase in
asphalt materials. The additional funds will enable the City to continue paving projects
and critical maintenance and repair of paved surfaces.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on April 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $1,025,000.00 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $12,257,500.00. Funds are available in the Street
Transportation and Aviation Departments' budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Hot Mix Asphalt Products - Contract 147410 (Ordinance S-44479) on April 18, 2018

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation and Aviation Departments.




Page 141



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
State Fair Towing - RFQ 18-129 - Amendment (Ordinance S-49065)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 148443 with Western Towing of Phoenix, Inc. dba
Western Towing for Arizona State Fair towing services for the Police Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $30,000.

Summary
This contract will provide the Police Department towing services to relocate vehicles or
property from illegal parking areas for the Arizona State Fair. The Arizona State Fair is
held annually during the months of September and October. Additional funds are being
requested, as the actual need for services has been greater than originally estimated
and the length of the 2022 Arizona State Fair has been extended by one week. This
service is essential to enforce the mandated Arizona Revised Statutes, Phoenix City
Codes, and departmental policies to tow vehicles.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on Sept. 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $30,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $125,000. Funds are available in the Police Department's
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• State Fair Towing - Contract 148443 (Ordinance S-44984) on Sept. 19, 2018;
• State Fair Towing - Contract 148443 (Ordinance S-48297) on Feb. 2, 2022.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.




Page 142



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Enter into an Agreement with Salt River Valley Water Users'
Association and Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District
and Others for Accounting and Delivery of Water Made Available in the Modified
Roosevelt Dam Flood Control Space (Ordinance S-49054)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
among Salt River Valley Water Users' Association; Salt River Project Agricultural
Improvement and Power District; and the Arizona cities of Avondale, Chandler,
Glendale, Mesa, Peoria, Scottsdale, and Tempe: Town of Gilbert; Roosevelt Water
Conservation District; Buckeye Water Conservation and Drainage District; Roosevelt
Irrigation District; the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, a sovereign tribe
located in the Phoenix metropolitan area; and Freeport Minerals Corporation for
Accounting and Delivery of Water Made Available in the Modified Roosevelt Dam
Flood Control Space under a temporary deviation to the Water Control Plan. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
total value of the agreement will not exceed $26,000.
Summary
The parties are entities that are entitled to use spill water from Roosevelt Dam on the
Salt River. The parties are proposing a change to the Water Control Plan that governs
operations of the flood control space at Roosevelt Dam. The proposed changes to the
Water Control Plan contemplate planned instances to allow deviations from normal
dam regulation in order to maximize reservoir and water use. Under provisions of
section 7-14(c) or the Water Control Plan and section 7 of the Water Control
Agreement, Salt River Project (SRP), Reclamation, and the Corps of Engineers
developed a planned deviation wherein SRP, among other things, is authorized to
extend the evacuation period for water entering the first five feet of the Flood Control
Space on a five-year pilot basis. By extending the evacuation period, the participating
entities will have greater access to use flood waters impounded behind Roosevelt
Dam. Phoenix will have access to the largest volume of 18.41 percent.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about Oct. 1, 2022 for the length of the pilot project, or
five years and 120 days, whichever is shorter.




Page 143

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the agreement is not to exceed $26,000.

Funding for this contract is available in the Water Services Department's Operating
budget.

Location
Outside of the City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 144



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Settlement Agreement with Connect 202 Partners, LLC, for Water Main Cathodic
Protection Associated with the SR202 Construction (Ordinance S-49056)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Settlement
Agreement with Connect 202 Partners, LLC, to resolve a water main cathodic
protection issue associated with the State Route 202 South Mountain Freeway Project.
Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this item.
The City will be paid in the amount of $47,500.

Summary
The South Mountain Freeway Project installed a water main with cathodic protection
along Liberty Lane from Desert Foothills Parkway to approximately 20th Way. The
water main will require ongoing inspection and monitoring. Connect 202 Partners will
pay the Water Services Department $47,500 to resolve issues related to the cathodic
protection and otherwise discharge any potential claims.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about Oct. 15, 2022, with the money to be paid to the
City within five days of the effective date.

Financial Impact
The City will be paid in the amount of $47,500.

Location
Liberty Lane from Desert Foothills Parkway to 20th Way.
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 145



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***ITEM CORRECTED (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Modification of Stipulation
Request for Ratification of July 20, 2022 Planning Hearing Officer Action - PHO-1
-22--Z-58-04-1 - Approximately 550 Feet South of the Southwest Corner of 43rd
Avenue and Cactus Road

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve Planning
Commission recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on matters
heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on July 20, 2022 and the Planning Commission
on Sept. 1, 2022. This ratification requires formal action only.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-22--Z-58-04-1
Existing Zoning: C-O (Approved C-1)
Acreage: 1.08

Owner: Benjamin and Corina Covaciu
Applicant: Daniel Istrate, Kontexture LLC
Representative: Daniel Istrate, Kontexture LLC

Proposal:
1. Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance with the site plan date
stamped May 24, 2004, and elevations date stamped July 7, 2004.
2. Deletion of Stipulation 4 regarding parking lot landscaping.
3. Technical corrections for Stipulations 2 and 3.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
VPC Action: The North Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this case on May
18, 2022, and recommended denial, by a vote of 13-2.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer heard this case on June 15, 2022, and
continued the case. The Planning Hearing Officer heard this case again on July 20,
2022, and recommended approval with a modification and an additional stipulation.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, with a modification and an additional stipulation, as
recommended by the Planning Hearing Officer.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Planning Hearing Officer recommendation with an


Page 146

additional stipulation, by a vote of 7-0. See Attachment A (Stipulations) for the list of
Planning Commission recommended stipulations.

Location
Approximately 550 feet south of the southwest corner of 43rd Avenue and Cactus
Road.
Council District: 1
Parcel Address: 11990 N. 43rd Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 147
To: Alan Stephenson Date: October 10, 2022
Deputy City Manager

From: Joshua Bednarek
Planning and Development Deputy Director

Subject: CORRECTION TO ITEM 75 (PHO-1-22-Z-58-04-1) ON THE OCTOBER 12, 2022
FORMAL AGENDA – MODIFICATION OF STIPULATION REQUEST FOR
RATIFICATION OF JULY 20, 2022 PLANNING HEARING OFFICER -
APPROXIMATELY 550 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
43RD AVENUE AND CACTUS ROAD

Item 75, is a request to modify stipulations from rezoning case Z-58-04-1 on a 1.08-acre
site at approximately 550 feet south of the southwest corner of 43rd Avenue and Cactus
Road in Council District 1, zoned C-O (Approved C-1).

This memo deletes pages 150 & 151 in Attachment A to remove an inadvertently attached
legal description and ordinance location map.




Approved: ______________________________________
Alan Stephenson, Deputy City Manager
Attachment A

PHO-1-22—Z-58-04-1

Planning Commission Approved Stipulations:

1. That THE development shall be in general conformance with the site plan AND
ELEVATIONS date stamped JULY 20, 2022, May 24, 2004 and elevations date
stamped July 7, 2004 as approved or modified by the FOLLOWING
STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND Development
Services Department.

2. That Four sided architecturEal shall be used on residential development.
Examples of the types of details to consider are French windows,
ornamentation in the gable area, garages setback to the rear of the house,
garage door windows, porches, 18 foot inch eaves, shutters, decorative framing
around the windows, windowsills, window fenestrations, balconies, lighting, and
other enhancements as approved by THE PLANNING AND Development
Services Department.

3. That Mature trees a minimum of 2-inch caliper spaced 20-feet on center or
equivalent groupings as approved by the PLANNING AND Development
Services Department SHALL be installed along the west side of Parcel B and
the south side of Parcel A in order to buffer the proposed commercial
development from proposed residential uses.

4. That mature trees a minimum of 2 inch caliper be placed in the three parking
islands and the two corners of the parking lot on the south side of Parcel B in
order to buffer the proposed commercial development from existing residential
uses.

4. That Right-of-way totaling 50 feet shall be dedicated for the south half of
5. Cactus Road.

5. That The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
6. development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the City. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

6. That Construction vehicle access to the residential Parcel C shall be off of 43rd
7. Avenue or Cactus Road during the construction phase.

7. That Lot 1, and two of Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, shall be limited to one story, for a
8. total of three lots being limited to one story.

8. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER


-1-
Page 148
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

9. ENHANCED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO INCLUDE
COVERAGE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SITE TO ADDRESS
PRIVACY.




-2-
Page 149
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-43-A-98-2



THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED CAVE CREEK, IN THE
COUNTY OF MARICOPA,
STATE OF ARIZONA, IN A PORTION OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

Lot 3, of TATUM PLAZA, according to Book 818 of Maps, page 16, records of Maricopa
County, Arizona.




-3-
Page 150
-4-




Page 151



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Deer Valley Business Center Buildings 5-6-7 - PLAT 210087 - West of
7th Avenue and North of Rose Garden Lane

Plat: 210087
Project: 21-1411
Name of Plat: Deer Valley Business Center Building 5-6-7
Owner: Sunbelt Rose Garden, L.P.
Engineer: James A. Brucci, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Sept. 7, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located west of 7th Avenue and north of Rose Garden Lane.
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 152



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Street Name Change from 38th Avenue to Sandomir Way (Ordinance S-49069)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to rename the segment of
38th Avenue between Wier Avenue and Roeser Road to Sandomir Way, based on a
request by the property owner, Laveen Elementary School District, whose property
fronts the affected street segment.

Summary
The Laveen Elementary School District No. 59 is requesting that the Phoenix City
Council change the street name from "38th Avenue" to "Sandomir Way" from Wier
Avenue to Roeser Road.

The portion of street being requested to rename is a segment of 38th Avenue that
lies between the south right-of-way line of Wier Avenue extending south to the north
right-of-way line of Roeser Road. A portion of this street was dedicated on the
MAURICE C. CASH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL subdivision plat on Feb. 24, 2011, in
Book 1078 of Maps, Page 05 in the official records of Maricopa County, Arizona.
Another portion of 38th Avenue was dedicated on the MARICOPA GARDEN
FARMS subdivision plat on Jan. 4, 1924, in Book 011 of Maps, Page 38 in the
official records of Maricopa County, Arizona. The remaining portion of 38th Avenue
was accepted by the Phoenix City Council in Ordinance S-10264 on Jan. 24, 1978.

This street naming assignment is in accordance with the City of Phoenix Street
Naming Process and the Maricopa County Association of Governments "Address
and Street Name Assignment Policy" requirements. The requestor, the Laveen
Elementary School District No. 59, owns the only property fronting the affected
street segment, so there are no other interested property owners. Pursuant to the
City policy the applicant presented for information only to the Laveen Village
Planning Committee and there were no individual concerns expressed by the
village members.

Location
38th Avenue from Wier Avenue to Roeser Road.
Council District: 7


Page 153


This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.




Page 154



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-49-22-1-2 -
Southwest Corner of 7th Street and Pinnacle Peak Road (Ordinance G-7029)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
from A-1 SP DVAO (Light Industrial District, Special Permit, Deer Valley Airport Overlay
District) and A-1 DVAO (Light Industrial District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to
A-1 DVAO (Light Industrial District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) to remove the
existing Special Permit on a portion of the site and allow light industrial uses.

Summary
Current Zoning: A-1 SP DVAO and A-1 DVAO
Proposed Zoning: A-1 DVAO
Acreage: 7.36 acres
Proposal: Removal of Special Permit to allow light industrial uses

Owner: William Cox, Park View Lane 5, LLC
Applicant: Hawkeye Development, LLC
Representative: Clark Diepholz

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 11,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 11-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southwest corner of 7th Street and Pinnacle Peak Road
Council District: 1 and 2
Parcel Address: 23100 and 23210 E. 7th St., and 675 E. Pinnacle Peak Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.


Page 155
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-49-22-1-2) FROM A-1 SP DVAO (LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SPECIAL PERMIT, DEER VALLEY
AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT) AND A-1 DVAO (LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, DEER VALLEY AIRPORT OVERLAY
DISTRICT) TO A-1 DVAO (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, DEER
VALLEY AIRPORT OVERLAY DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 7.36-acre property located at the southwest

corner of 7th Street and Pinnacle Peak Road in a portion of Sections 16 and 17,

Township 4 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby

changed from 2.20 acres of “A-1 SP DVAO” (Light Industrial District, Special Permit,

Deer Valley Airport Overlay District) and 5.16 acres of “A-1 DVAO” (Light Industrial

District, Deer Valley Airport Overlay District), to “A-1 DVAO” (Light Industrial District,

Deer Valley Airport Overlay District).




Page 156
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. A 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated along the
south side of Pinnacle Peak Road and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail
(MUT) shall be constructed within the easement in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with
the Site Planning Section on an alternative design through the technical appeal
process.

2. The property owner shall record a Notice of Prospective Purchasers of
Proximity to Airport in order to disclose the existence, and operational
characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners and tenants of the
property. The form and contents of such documents shall be according to the
templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved
by the City Attorney.

3. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

4. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

5. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

6. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the




Page 157
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




Page 158
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 159
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-49-22-1-2


Lot 9, of Pinnacle Peak Industrial, recorded in the official records of Maricopa County,
Arizona as book 1016 of maps, page 23. Located in the Northeast Quarter of Section
17, Township 04 North, Range 03 East of the Gila and Salt River Base Meridian,
Maricopa County, Arizona.




Page 160
Page 161



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-33-22-2 -
Southeast Corner of North Valley Parkway and Sonoran Desert Drive (Ordinance
G-7037)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 HGT/WVR NBCOD (Intermediate Commercial, Height Waiver, North Black
Canyon Overlay District) to C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR NBCOD (Intermediate
Commercial, Height Waiver, Density Waiver, North Black Canyon Overlay District) to
allow multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 HGT/WVR NBCOD
Proposed Zoning: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR NBCOD
Acreage: 15.86 acres
Proposal: Multifamily Residential

Owner: Hedgegrow Land Holdings, LLC
Applicant: LGC
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug.
11, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 6-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the North Gateway Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southeast corner of North Valley Parkway and Sonoran Desert Drive
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 2425 W. Sonoran Desert Drive

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.

Page 162
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-33-22-2) FROM C-2 HGT/WVR NBCOD
(INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, HEIGHT WAIVER, NORTH
BLACK CANYON OVERLAY DISTRICT) TO C-2 HGT/WVR
DNS/WVR NBCOD (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, HEIGHT
WAIVER, DENSITY WAIVER, NORTH BLACK CANYON
OVERLAY DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 15.86 acre property located at the southeast

corner of North Valley Parkway and Sonoran Desert Drive in a portion of Section 24,

Township 5 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby

changed from “C-2 HGT/WVR NBCOD” (Intermediate Commercial, Height Waiver,

North Black Canyon Overlay District) to “C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR NBCOD”

(Intermediate Commercial, Height Waiver, Density Waiver, North Black Canyon Overlay

District).




Page 163
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and
elevations date stamped July 12, 2022, as modified by the following
stipulations and approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. The development shall utilize the R-5 Planned Residential Development option.

3. The maximum density for the project shall not exceed 22 dwelling units per
acre.

4. A minimum of four amenities shall be provided, such as a pool, ramadas, a
bicycle repair station, clubhouse, or similar element, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

5. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

6. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide shared use path (SUP)
within a sidewalk easement along the east side of North Valley Parkway, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where conflicts or
restrictions exist, the developer shall work with the Site Planning section on an
alternate design through the technical appeal process.

7. The developer shall dedicate a 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE)
along the south side of Sonoran Desert Drive and construct a minimum 10-
foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the easement in accordance with the
MAG supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with
the Site Planning section on an alternate design through the technical appeal
process.

8. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-




Page 164
inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking area and achieve 25% shade at maturity, as approved
by Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts arise, the
developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on an
alternative design solution.

9. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk along
the east side of North Valley Parkway with a minimum 11-foot-wide landscaped
strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb, planted to the following
standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees placed a minimum of 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers maintained to a
maximum height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 50% live
coverage at maturity.

c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

10. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk along
the south side of Sonoran Desert Drive with a minimum 11-foot-wide
landscaped strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb, planted to the
following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees placed a minimum of 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers maintained to a
maximum height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 50% live
coverage at maturity.

c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

11. Pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect building entrances, public
sidewalks, bus stops, and community amenities, using the most direct route for
pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

12. The developer shall provide direct pedestrian access (path and gate) from the
northwest corner of the site to the signalized intersection at Sonoran Desert
Drive and North Valley Parkway, as approved by the Planning and




Page 165
Development Department.

13. Sidewalk and pedestrian path crossings, constructed of decorative pavers,
stamped or colored concrete, or another material, other than those used to
pave the parking surfaces and drive aisles, shall be provided across drive
aisles, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

14. The developer shall dedicate a minimum of 70-feet of right-of-way and
construct the south side of Sonoran Desert Drive, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

15. The developer shall dedicate a minimum of 70-feet of right-of-way and
construct the east side of North Valley Parkway, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

16. The developer shall construct a minimum 24-foot-wide landscaped median
along Sonoran Desert Drive, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department.

17. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

18. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the
parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic racks
located near building entrances and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix
Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

19. The right-of-way shall be dedicated, and a bus stop pad constructed along the
deceleration lane east of North Valley Parkway, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

20. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

21. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.




Page 166
22. Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents that
disclose to purchasers of the property the existence and operational
characteristics of active mining operations and the North Gateway Solid Waste
and Recycling Transfer Facility. The form and content of such documents shall
be according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

23. Prior to occupancy, signage must be provided within the development’s
sales/leasing office (or equivalent signage) that is visible to prospective renters
or purchasers which discloses the existence and operational characteristics of
active mining operations and the North Gateway Solid Waste and Recycling
Transfer Facility, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________




Page 167
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 168
EXHIBIT A

Lot 2, a portion of North Valley Parkway and Sonoran Desert Drive as shown on the
final plat of LIV North Valley, recorded in Book 335, page 47, Maricopa County Records
(MCR), lying within the northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 5 North, Range 2
East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, more
particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 2;

Thence leaving said southwest corner, North 90°00'00" West, 70.00 feet, to the
centerline of North Valley Parkway;

Thence along said centerline, North 00°21'15" West, 686.77 feet, to the centerline of
Sonoran Desert Drive;

Thence along said Sonoran Desert Drive centerline, North 89°55'50" East, 1100.25 feet;

Thence leaving said centerline, South 00°15'34" East, 70.00 feet to the northeast corner
of said Lot 2;

Thence along the easterly line of said Lot 2, South 00°15'34" East, 506.40 feet, to the
southerly line of said Lot 2;

Thence along said southerly line, South 71°47'50" West, 142.87 feet;

Thence South 89°57'14" West, 746.40 feet;

Thence South 52°40'01" West, 109.61 feet;

Thence North 90°00'00" West, 59.34 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Containing 691,063 Square Feet or 15.86 Acres more or less.
Subject to easements, restrictions and rights of way of record.




Page 169
Page 170



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-3-22-3 (12th &
Greenway PUD) - Approximately 175 Feet North of the Northwest Corner of 12th
Street and Greenway Parkway (Ordinance G-7035)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
-2 (Intermediate Commercial) and C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (Intermediate
Commercial, Height and Density Waiver) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow
multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 (3.96 acres) and C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (5.54 acres)
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 9.50 acres
Proposal: Multifamily residential

Owner: Donald Valk
Applicant & Representative: Nick Wood, Esq., Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info Only: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on April
14, 2022, for information only .
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 11,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with additional
stipulations, by a vote of 11-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the staff memo dated Sept. 1, 2022, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 175 feet north of the northwest corner of 12th Street and Greenway
Parkway
Council District: 3
Parcel Address: 1000 and 1100 E. Greenway Parkway




Page 171

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 172
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-3-22-3) FROM C-2 (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL) AND C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL, HEIGHT AND DENSITY WAIVER) TO PUD
(PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 9.50-acre property located approximately

175 feet north of the northwest corner of 12th Street and Greenway Parkway in a

portion of Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in

Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from 3.96 acres of “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial) and

5.54 acres of “C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR” (Intermediate Commercial, Height and

Density Waiver) to PUD (Planned Unit Development).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




Page 173
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the 12th and Greenway PUD reflecting
the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning
and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this
request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped July 21, 2022, as modified by the
following stipulations:

a. Front Cover: Remove “Submittal” dates and revise to add the following:

b. Page 10, Development Standards, D1:Development Standards Table,
Section D1.e Maximum Building Height: Update the header to, “Starting
from the West Property Line”.

2. The developer shall replenish the existing median island along Greenway
Parkway with trees, as approved by the Street Transportation Department. The
developer will be responsible for submitting median island landscape drawings
separately to the Street Transportation Department for review and approval.
Coordinate submission with Erik Wilson, Horticulturist, at 602-534-9898 or
erik.wilson@phoenix.gov.

3. The developer shall dedicate a sidewalk easement for any streetscape area
that falls outside of dedicated right-of-way, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

4. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. The TIS shall include signal warrant analysis for the intersection
of 12th Street and Greenway Parkway. The developer shall be responsible for
cost and construction of all mitigation identified through the analysis. No
preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and
approved by the Street Transportation Department.

5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.




Page 174
6. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the
templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved
by the City Attorney.

7. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to final site plan
approval that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the
development received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary
equipment used during construction exceeds the height of the permanent
structure a separate Form 7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and a “No
Hazard Determination” obtained prior to the construction start date.

8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

9. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.

10. Prior to final site plan approval, the developer shall complete an
agreement/contract with the Street Transportation Department to facilitate
clean-up of the wash corridor located in the area south of Greenway Parkway,
from the 9th Street to the 12th Street alignments, at the developer’s expense
for a minimum of five years, as modified and approved by the Street
Transportation Department.

11. Prior to final site plan approval, the developer shall complete an
agreement/contract with the Street Transportation Department to install
physical features to deter unauthorized access to the existing culvert
crossing(s) under 7th Street at Greenway Parkway up to a maximum of
$50,000, as modified and approved by the Street Transportation Department.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.




Page 175
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 176
EXHIBIT A

PARCEL NO. 1:

LOCATED IN GLO LOT 3, SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, GILA
AND SALT RIVER MEDERIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;

COMMENCING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4;

THENCE SOUTH 00’16’59” EAST, ALONG THE NORTH – SOUTH MID-SECTION
LINE OF SAID SECTION 4, A DISTANCE OF 662.73 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF
PHELPS RD.;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID MID-SECTION LINE, SOUTH 89’39’15” WEST, ALONG
SAID CENTER LINE, A DISTANCE OF 466.84 FEET;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE, SOUTH 00’00’43” EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00’00’43” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 233.20 FEET TO
THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GREEN WAY PARKWAY;

THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, THE
FOLLOWING 8 COURSES;

THENCE SOUTH 89’36’41” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 43.73 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 85’29’22” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.51 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89’36’41” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 45’23’19” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 16.97 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89’36’4L” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 46.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00’23’19” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 44’36’41 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 16.97 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89’36’41” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.93 FEET, TO THE
BEGINNING OF A 12.00 FEET RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEAST;

THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90’08’50”, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 18.88 FEET TO THE EAST
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 9TH STREET;




Page 177
THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 00’14’29” WEST,
ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 209.58 FEET, TO THE
BEGINNING OF A 12.00 FEET RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEAST;

THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89’53’44”, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 18.83 FEET TO THE
SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PHELPS RD.;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 89’39’15” EAST,
ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 515.63 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL NO. 2:

LOCATED IN GLO LOT 3, SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, GILA
AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4;

THENCE SOUTH 00’16’59” EAST, ALONG THE NORTH – SOUTH MID-SECTION
LINE OF SAID SECTION 4, A DISTANCE OF 662.73 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF
PHELPS RD.;

THENCE DEPARING SAID MID-SECTION LINE, SOUTH 00’00’43” EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PHELPS RD.
AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH 89’39’15” EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 724.95 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A 12.00 FEET RADIUS
CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWEST;

THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90’03’46”, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 18.86 FEET TO THE WEST
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 12TH STREET;

THENCE DEPARING SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH 00’16’59” EAST,
ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 232.34 FEET;

THENCE DEPARING SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 86’18’31” WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 47.33 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 67’37’58” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 61.24 FEET;




Page 178
THENCE SOUTH 76’38’07” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 108.47 FEET, TO THE NORTH
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GREENWAY PARKWAY AND THE BEGINNING OF A
1,490.29 FOOT RADIUS, NON-TANGENT CURVE, WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH
15’38’52” WEST;

THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15’42’11”, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
DISTANCE OF 408.44 FEET;

THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH
89’36’41” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 124.99 FEET;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 00’00’43” WEST,
A DISTANCE OF 233.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.




Page 179
Page 180



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-26-22-4 -
Approximately 430 Feet East of the Northeast Corner of Central Avenue and
Osborn Road (Ordinance G-7031)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 H-R TOD-1 (Intermediate Commercial, High Rise Incentive District, Interim Transit-
Oriented Zoning Overlay One) and P-2 H-R TOD-1 (Parking, High Rise Incentive
District, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay One) to WU Code T5:6 MT (Walkable
Urban Code, Transect 5:6, Transit Midtown Character Area) to allow multifamily
residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 H-R TOD-1 and P-2 H-R TOD-1
Proposed Zoning: WU Code T5:6 MT
Acreage: 4.10 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily Residential

Owner: 3443 North Central, LLC
Applicant: Mill Creek Residential
Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 1,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-3.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Encanto Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 430 feet east of the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Osborn
Road
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 150 E. Osborn Road and 3443 N. Central Ave.



Page 181

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.




Page 182
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (Z-26-22-4) FROM C-2 H-R TOD-1 (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL, HIGH RISE INCENTIVE DISTRICT, INTERIM
TRANSIT-ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY ONE) AND P-2 H-R
TOD-1 (PARKING, HIGH RISE INCENTIVE DISTRICT, INTERIM
TRANSIT-ORIENTED ZONING OVERLAY ONE) TO WU CODE
T5:6 MT (WALKABLE URBAN CODE, TRANSECT 5:6, TRANSIT
MIDTOWN CHARACTER AREA).

____________


BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 4.10-acre site located approximately 430

feet east of the northeast corner of Central Avenue and Osborn Road, in a portion of

Section 29, Township 2 North, and Range 3 East, as described more specifically in

Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from 0.53-acres of “C-2 H-R TOD-1” (Intermediate

Commercial, High Rise Incentive District, Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay

One) and 3.57 acres of “P-2 H-R TOD-1” (Parking, High Rise Incentive District,

Interim Transit-Oriented Zoning Overlay One) to 4.10 acres of “WU Code T5:6 MT”

(Walkable Urban Code, Transect 5:6, Transit Midtown Character Area).




Page 183
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following

stipulations, violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of

the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and
minimum 10-foot-wide landscape area located between the back of curb and
sidewalk along the north side of Osborn Road planted to the following
standards. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with the creation of a comfortable pedestrian environment.

a. All trees shall be of a large canopy, shade, and single-trunk variety with
a minimum 3-inch caliper.

b. At tree maturity, the trees shall shade the sidewalks to a minimum 75
percent.

c. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers maintained to a
maximum height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 75 percent live
coverage at maturity.

2. The developer shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below and
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. All required bicycle parking for multifamily use, per Section 1307.H.6.d
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be secured parking.

b. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be provided at
a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit with a maximum of 50 required
spaces near entrances of buildings and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

c. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
by the developer near secure bicycle parking area.

3. The developer shall dedicate a sidewalk easement for any streetscape area
that falls outside of dedicated right-of-way, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.


Page 184
4. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

5. Developer to record a Notice to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport,
as required by the State, prior to final site plan approval.

6. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to final site plan
approval that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the
development received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary
equipment used during construction exceeds the height of the FAA and a “NO
Hazard Determination” obtained prior to the construction start date.

7. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

9. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the

validity of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.



________________________________
MAYOR



Page 185
ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager


Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 186
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-26-22-4


LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST
QUARTER, FROM WHICH THE EAST QUARTER CORNER BEARS SOUTH 89
DEGREES 23 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2663.82 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 484.31 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 434.20 FEET TO THE MONUMENT LINE OF EAST MITCHELL DRIVE;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID
MONUMENT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 411.36 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE
PROLONGATION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 1, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 726,
PAGE 48, A DISTANCE OF 434.27 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
NORTHEAST QUARTER;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 412.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 178,804 SQUARE FEET OR 4.105 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.




Page 187
Page 188



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-29-22-4 -
Northwest Corner of 4th Avenue and Osborn Road (Ordinance G-7032)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
P-1 (Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited District), C-2 (Intermediate Commercial
District), and R-5 (Multifamily Residence District) to WU Code T5:6 MT (Walkable
Urban Code, Transect 5:6, Transit Midtown Character Area) to allow multifamily
residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: P-1 (0.92-acres), C-2 (1.37 acres), and R-5 (1.77 acres)
Proposed Zoning: WU Code T5:6 MT
Acreage: 4.06 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Owner: Masyno Osborn, LLC
Applicant: Subtext Living
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq; Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 1,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with an additional
stipulation, by a vote of 8-2.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Encanto Village Planning Committee
recommendation, per the Encanto Village Planning Committee recommendation, by a
vote of 7-0.

Location
Northwest corner of 4th Avenue and Osborn Road
Council District: 4
Parcel Address: 3404, 3410, and 3500 N. 4th Ave. and 402 W. Osborn Road




Page 189

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.




Page 190
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (Z-29-22-4) FROM P-1 (PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE
PARKING, LIMITED DISTRICT), C-2 (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT), AND R-5 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT) TO WU CODE T5:6 MT (WALKABLE URBAN CODE,
TRANSECT 5:6, TRANSIT MIDTOWN CHARACTER AREA).


____________


BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 4.06-acre site located at the northwest

corner of 4th Avenue and Osborn Road, in a portion of Section 29, Township 2 North,

and Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from

0.92-acres of “P-1” (Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited District), 1.37 acres of “C-

2” (Intermediate Commercial District), and 1.77 acres of “R-5” (Multifamily Residence

District) to 4.06 acres of “WU Code T5:6 MT” (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 5:6,

Transit Midtown Character Area).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.


Page 191
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. There shall be a minimum landscape area of 10 feet in width measured from
the west property line (adjacent to alleyway) and beginning 215 feet north of
the north right-of-way line of Osborn Road and extending to the northern edge
of the subject site. The area shall be planted with minimum 3-inch caliper
shade trees placed 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, except where
utility conflicts and conflicts with building egress such as ramps exist. The
conditions of this stipulation shall be approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

2. The developer shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below and
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. All required bicycle parking for multifamily use, per Section 1307.H.6.d
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be secured parking.

b. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be provided at
a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit with a maximum of 50 required
spaces near entrances of buildings and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

c. One bicycle repair station shall be provided and maintained by the
developer in areas of high visibility and near secure bicycle parking
areas.

3. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and
minimum 10-foot-wide landscape strip located between the back of curb and
sidewalk along the north side of Osborn Road, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

4. The developer shall construct the west side of 4th Avenue for the length of the
project, in general conformance with the 4th Avenue TOD Retrofit exhibit date
stamped June 21, 2022, as approved or modified by the Street Transportation
Department. The developer shall dedicate necessary sidewalk easement to
accommodate the on-street parking and detached sidewalk design. The
development project shall be responsible for all landscape and irrigation
maintenance located in the right-of-way and sidewalk easement area.

5. The developer shall pave the 20-foot-wide alley per the City of Phoenix “local
street” standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.



Page 192
6. The developer shall underground all existing electrical utilities within the public
right-of-way that are impacted or require relocations as part of the project.
Coordinate with the affected utility company for their review and approval prior
to Final Site Plan approval.

7. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

9. Developer to record a Notice to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport,
as required by the State, prior to final site plan approval.

10. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to final site plan
approval that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the
development received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary
equipment used during construction exceeds the height of the FAA and a “NO
Hazard Determination” obtained prior to the construction start date.

11. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

12. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.

13. The developer shall incorporate solar panels with a kW range of not less than
100 kW.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.




Page 193
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.



________________________________
MAYOR



ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager


Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 194
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-29-22-4

PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH,
RANGE 3 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL NO. 1

UNITS 101 THROUGH 118, INCLUSIVE, 219 THROUGH 240, INCLUSIVE, AND ALL
COMMON ELEMENTS OF 3500 N 4TH AVENUE CONDOMINIUM, A CONDOMINIUM
AS CREATED BY THAT CERTAIN DECLARATION RECORDED OCTOBER 02, 2006
AS 2006-1298595 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF SAID
CONDOMINIUM RECORDED AS BOOK 869 OF MAPS, PAGE 37 AND AFFIDAVIT OF
CORRECTION RECORDED AS 2006-1614719 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORD OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.

PARCEL NO. 2

LOT 9, OF LINGERLONGER PLACE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
RECORDED IN BOOK 8 OF MAPS, PAGE 35;

EXCEPT THE EAST 10 FEET THEREOF DEEDED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX, IN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN DOCKET 15670, PAGE 532.

PARCEL NO. 3

LOT 10, OF LINGERLONGER PLACE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
RECORDED IN BOOK 8 OF MAPS, PAGE 35;

EXCEPT THEREFROM THE SOUTH 10 FEET, THE EAST 10 FEET, AND THAT PART
OF SAID LOT 10, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10;

THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 31 FEET;

THENCE SOUTHWEST TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 10 WHICH IS
31 FEET WEST OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AS QUITCLAIMED TO THE CITY OF
PHOENIX, BUT INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 30, 1974 IN DOCKET 10675, PAGE
632.




Page 195
Page 196



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-39-22-5 -
Approximately 340 Feet East of the Southeast Corner of 29th Avenue and
Northern Avenue (Ordinance G-7033)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R-5 SP (Multifamily Residence District, Special Permit) to R-5 (Multifamily Residence
District), to remove the Special Permit and allow multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: R-5 SP
Proposed Zoning: R-5
Acreage: 0.65 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Owner: New Freedom Housing, LLC
Applicant: Matt Waltz
Representative: Matt Waltz

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Alhambra Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 23,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 14-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Alhambra Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 340 feet east of the southeast corner of 29th Avenue and Northern
Avenue
Council District: 5
Parcel Address: 2821 and 2825 W. Northern Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.


Page 197
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (Z-39-22-5) FROM R-5 SP (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT, SPECIAL PERMIT) to R-5 (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________


BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 0.65 acre property located approximately

340 feet east of the southeast corner of 29th Avenue and Northern Avenue, in a portion

of Section 2, Township 2 North, and Range 2 East, as described more specifically in

Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from “R-5 SP” (Multifamily Residence District, Special

Permit) to “R-5” (Multifamily Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the




Page 198
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.



________________________________
MAYOR



ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager


Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 199
EXHIBIT A

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN PHOENIX, IN A
PORTION OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, IN THE COUNTY
OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

Parcel No. 1:
Lot 6, BEVERLY ACRES, according to Book 15 of Maps, Page 34, records of Maricopa
County, Arizona;

EXCEPT the east 75.00 feet thereof; and

EXCEPT the North 7.00 feet.

Parcel No. 2:
The East 75.00 feet of Lot 6, BEVERLY ACRES, according to Book 15 of Maps, page
34, records of Maricopa County, Arizona;

EXCEPT the North 157.00 feet thereof.

Parcel No. 3;
The North 157.00 feet of the East 75.00 feet of Lot 6, BEVERLY ACRES, according to
Book 15 of Maps, Page 34, records of Maricopa County, Arizona;

EXCEPT the North 7.00 feet.




Page 200
Page 201



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-38-22-6 -
Southeast Corner of 10th Street and Pasadena Avenue (Ordinance G-7038)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
P-1 (Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited District) to R-4 (Multifamily Residence
District) to allow single-family attached residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: P-1
Proposed Zoning: R-4
Acreage: 0.72 acres
Proposal: Single-family attached residential

Owner: Brian R. Puziss
Applicant: Andrew Nametz, Pasadena 1 Zero, LLC
Representative: William F. Allison, Withey Morris, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Camelback East Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug.
2, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 13-0-
1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Camelback East Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southeast corner of 10th St. and Pasadena Ave.
Council District: 6
Parcel Address: 5020 N. 10th Place and 1001 and 1003 E. Pasadena Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.



Page 202
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-38-22-6) FROM P-1 (PASSENGER
AUTOMOBILE PARKING, LIMITED DISTRICT) TO R-4
(MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 0.72 acre site located at the southeast

corner of 10th Street and Pasadena Avenue in a portion of Section 16, Township 2

North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed

from “P-1” (Passenger Automobile Parking, Limited District), to “R-4” (Multifamily

Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




Page 203
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance to the elevations date stamped
May 6, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations and approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

2. The maximum building height shall be 30 feet.

3. The maximum density for the project shall not exceed 12 dwelling units per acre.

4. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk along
the south side of Pasadena Avenue with a minimum 8-foot-wide landscaped strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following
standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy, single-trunk, shade trees placed to
provide a minimum of 75% shade on adjacent sidewalks.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative maintained to a maximum height of
24 inches to provide a minimum of 75% live coverage at maturity.

c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with
a pedestrian environment.

5. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide sidewalk along the east
side of 10th Street and west side of 10th Place, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

6. A minimum of 4 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances or open space areas and
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Artistic
racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

7. Existing irrigation facilities along Pasadena Avenue are to be undergrounded and
relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land rights
and establish the appropriate process to relocate the facility. Relocations that
require additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to
obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval.

8. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,




Page 204
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

9. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

10. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________




Page 205
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 206
EXHIBIT A


THAT PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 3, BLOCK 5, SMITH PLACE AND
SURROUNDING 10TH STREET, PASADENA AVENUE AND 10TH PLACE,
RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS, PAGE 2, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST OF THE
GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A 3-INCH CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE
MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16, FROM WHICH
A 3-INCH CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE MARKING THE
SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16 BEARS SOUTH 89
DEGREES 51 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST 2,667.40 FEET, SAID LINE
BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST 1,333.71
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER TO A 3-
INCH CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAP FLUSH ON THE CENTERLINE OF
SAID 10TH STREET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST 236.86
FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 00 DEGREES 06
MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST 93.82 FEET TO A 3-INCH CITY OF PHOENIX
BRASS CAP FLUSH ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID PASADENA AVENUE;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 333.16
FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A 1-INCH IRON PIPE IN HANDHOLE
ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID 10TH PLACE;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST 93.52
FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST 333.25
FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINES OF SAID LOTS 1 AND 3 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
COMPROMISING 0.717 ACRES OR 31,218 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS,
SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD.




Page 207
Page 208



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-13-22-8 -
Approximately 150 Feet West of the Northwest Corner of 9th Street and Portland
Street (Ordinance G-7030)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R-4 RI HP (Multifamily Residence District, Residential Infill District, Historic
Preservation Overlay) to WU Code T4:2 EG HP (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 4:2
District, Transit Eastlake-Garfield Character Area, Historic Preservation Overlay) to
allow multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: R-4 RI HP
Proposed Zoning: WU Code T4:2 EG HP
Acreage: 1.36 acres
Proposal: Multifamily residential

Owner: Robert Severino, RS4, LLC
Applicant: Rodney Sherrard, RS Architecture, LLC
Representative: Rodney Sherrard, RS Architecture, LLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 8,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 11-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Central City Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 150 feet west of the northwest corner of 9th Street and Portland Street
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 740, 744, 748, and 756 E. Portland St.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.

Page 209
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-13-22-8) FROM R-4 RI HP (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL INFILL DISTRICT,
HISTORIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY) TO WU CODE T4:2 EG
HP (WALKABLE URBAN CODE, TRANSECT 4:2 DISTRICT,
TRANSIT EASTLAKE-GARFIELD CHARACTER AREA, HISTORIC
PRESERVATION OVERLAY).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.36-acre site located approximately 150 feet

west of the northwest corner of 9th Street and Portland Street in a portion of Section 4,

Township 1 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby

changed from “R-4 RI HP” (Multifamily Residence District, Residential Infill District,

Historic Preservation Overlay), to “WU Code T4:2 EG HP” (Walkable Urban Code,

Transect 4:2 District, Transit Eastlake-Garfield Character Area, Historic Preservation

Overlay).




Page 210
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. A minimum setback of 20 feet shall be required along the Portland Street
frontage.

2. Existing trees located within the setback along the Portland Street frontage,
shall be preserved in place, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.

3. The maximum building height shall be 21 feet.

4. A minimum of 3 amenities shall be provided within the required common open
space, such as, but not limited to swimming pools, tot lots, barbecue and picnic
areas, game courts, jogging/parcours, or lawn/turf, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

5. Bicycle parking pursuant to Section 1307.H.6 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be
provided for the total units on the site. In addition, the development shall
provide and maintain the following bicycle infrastructure as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be provided at
a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit with a maximum of 50 spaces near
entrances of buildings and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

b. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided on the site. The
station shall include but not limited to: standard repair tools affixed to the
station; a tire gauge and pump; and a bicycle repair stand which allows
pedals and wheels to spin freely while making adjustments to the bike,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6. The developer shall maintain the existing width of the historic landscape area
within the right-of-way and replenish the landscaping per the landscape
standards of Section 1309 of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the


Page 211
developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on
alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.

7. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

8. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

9. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

10. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:



Page 212
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 213
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-13-22-8


LOTS 11 AND 13, AND THE WEST HALF OF LOT 15, BLOCK 2, BRILLS ADDITION
AMENDED, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ALSO BEING A PORTION OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST,
OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.




Page 214
Page 215



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-24-22-8 -
Approximately 370 Feet West of the Southwest Corner of 48th Street and
McDowell Road (Ordinance G-7036)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 (Intermediate Commercial District) and R-5 (Multifamily Residence District) to R-5
(Multifamily Residence District) to allow multifamily residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 (7.48 acres) and R-5 (0.64 acres)
Proposed Zoning: R-5
Acreage: 8.12 acres
Proposal: Multifamily residential

Owner: MV McDowell Partners, LLC
Applicant: Kairos Investments Management Company
Representative: Benjamin Graff, Quarles & Brady, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Camelback East Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug.
2, 2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 15-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Camelback East Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 370 feet west of the southwest corner of 48th Street and McDowell
Road
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 4707, 4709, 4717 E. McDowell Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.


Page 216
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-24-22-8) FROM C-2 (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AND R-5 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT) TO R-5 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of an 8.12-acre site located approximately 370

feet west of the southwest corner of 48th Street and McDowell Road in a portion of

Section 6, Township 1 North, Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A,” is hereby changed from 7.48 acres of “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial District) and

0.64 acres of “R-5” (Multifamily Residence District), to “R-5” (Multifamily Residence

District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




Page 217
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The landscape setbacks along 48th Street and McDowell Road shall be
landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-
tolerant shade trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. When possible, the
developer shall use existing trees and landscaping to meet the landscaping
requirements.

2. Upon complete redevelopment or development that increases the
cumulative floor area by more than 15% from that depicted on the site
plan date stamped March 29, 2022, a minimum of 10% open space shall be
provided, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. Upon complete redevelopment or development that increases the
cumulative floor area by more than 15% from that depicted on the site
plan date stamped March 29, 2022, bicycle parking spaces shall be provided
per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall
adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

4. Upon complete redevelopment or development that increases the
cumulative floor area by more than 15% from that depicted on the site
plan date stamped March 29, 2022, a minimum 5-foot wide sidewalk shall be
provided along McDowell Road and be detached with a minimum 13-foot wide
landscaped strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb, per Cross
Section A, as identified on the Street Classification Map, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Minimum 2-inch caliper trees shall be
planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings with five 5-gallon shrubs
per tree, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where
utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

5. Upon complete redevelopment or development that increases the
cumulative floor area by more than 15% from that depicted on the site
plan date stamped March 29, 2022, the sidewalk along 48th Street shall be
detached with a minimum 5-foot wide landscaped strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb, as approved by the Planning and Development



Page 218
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

6. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

7. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

9. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.

10. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

11. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

12. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

13. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.




Page 219
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (4 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 220
EXHIBIT A

Real property in the City of Phoenix, County of Maricopa, State of Arizona, in a
portion of Section 6, Township 1 North, Range 4 East described as follows:

PARCEL NO.1:

THAT PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 2, OF SPARKS TRACT, ACCORDING TO
BOOK 14 OF MAPS, PAGE 44, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER,
SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST ALONG
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF
294.85 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST 40.00
FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 7.00 FEET OF THE
EAST 262.00 FEET OF THE SAID LOT 2, SPARKS TRACT;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 262.00 FEET OF
THE SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 119.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;

THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH ALONG THE SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF
136.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 262.00 FEET TO
THE EAST 262.00 FEET OF THE SAID LOT 2,
SPARKS TRACT;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTH 262.00 FEET OF LOT 2, SPARKS TRACT,
A DISTANCE OF 255.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO AND 7.00 FEET WEST FROM THE EAST LINE
OF THE SAID LOT 2, SPARKS TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 243.30 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST
PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID LOTS 1 AND 2, SPARKS
TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 991.20 FEET;




Page 221
THENCE NORTH 32 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST 164.00
FEET;

THENCE NORTH 40 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST 215.00
FEET;

THENCE NORTH 47 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST 206.72
FEET;

THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 02 SECONDS EAST 78.71 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 7.00 FEET OF THE SAID
LOTS 1 AND 2, SPARKS TRACT;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 183.74 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 119.41 FEET;

THENCE EAST 109.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WEST OF THE
NORTH PROLONGATION OF LINE "A" DESCRIBED BELOW AND NORTH OF
THE LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 6;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 A DISTANCE OF 294.85 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES I 3 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF
40.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 7.00 FEET OF THE
EAST 262.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 2;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST 262.00 FEET A

DISTANCE OF I 19.00 FEET; THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 109.00 FEET;

THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE DESIGNATED HEREIN AS LINE "A", TO THE
SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 12.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 2 AND THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;

THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST
449.33 FEET OF THE SAID SECTION 6, BEING THE POINT CURVATURE OF A




Page 222
CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE SOUTH, HAYING A RADIUS OF 8641.99 FEET;

THENCE WEST ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 00 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 07 SECONDS A DISTANCE OF 143.58
FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT I AND THE
TERMINUS OF THE LINE DESCRIBED HEREIN;

EXCEPT THE NORTH 7.00 FEET THEREOF.

PARCEL NO. 2:

AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND PUBLIC UTILITIES, OVER THE
WEST 24.00 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:

FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER,
SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER
BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 6 A DISTANCE
OF 294.85 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES I 3 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST, 40.00 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF THE NORTH 7.00 FEET OF THE EAST 262.00 FEET OF THE SAID
LOT 2, SPARKS TRACT;

THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 262.00 FEET OF LOT 2,
SPARKS TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 119.00 FEET;

THENCE WEST 109.00 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 119.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH
7.00 FEET OF THE SAID LOT 2, SPARKS TRACT;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE
SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 109.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, AS CREATED IN DOCUMENT RECORDED AS DOCKET 16272
PAGE 110 AND AMENDED IN DOCUMENT RECORDED AS 83-081470 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.

PARCEL NO. 3:

AN EASEMENT FOR PARKING OVER ALL PARKING AREAS CONSTRUCTED ON




Page 223
THE OFFICE PARCEL WHICH SAID OFFICE PARCEL IS DESIGNATED ON
EXHIBIT "B" OF DOCUMENT RECORDED AS DOCKET 16272, PAGE 110, AS
CREATED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED AS DOCKET 16272, PAGE 110




Page 224
Page 225



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-28-22-8 -
Northwest Corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road (Ordinance G-7034)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to R1-8 (Single-Family Residence District) to
allow single-family residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1
Proposed Zoning: R1-8
Acreage: 12.85 acres
Proposal: Single-family residential

Owner: Seibert Revocable Living Survivor's Trst
Applicant: Lou Turner, Hillstone Homes
Representative: David Maguire, Land Solutions, Inc.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this case on July
12, 2022, and continued the case to the Aug. 9, 2022 hearing, where they
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with additional stipulations, by a
vote of 7-4.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the staff memo dated Sept. 1, 2022, by a vote of 6-1.

Location
Northwest corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 2310 W. Baseline Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.



Page 226
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-28-22-8) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R1-8 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT)
____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 12.85-acre site located at the northwest

corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road in a portion of Section 36, Township 1 North,

Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “S-

1” (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to “R1-8” (Single-Family Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




Page 227
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall not exceed a maximum of 55 lots.

2. A minimum of 10% of the gross site area, exclusive of required landscape
setbacks, shall be provided as open space, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

3. A minimum landscape setback of 20 feet shall be provided along 23rd and 24th
Avenues. The landscape setback may be reduced to 17 feet for up to 50% of
this frontage for the purpose of staggering setbacks for the perimeter theme
wall, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum landscape setback of 50 feet shall be provided along Baseline
Road. The landscape setback may be reduced to 47 feet for up to 50% of this
frontage for the purpose of staggering the perimeter theme wall and screening
utility boxes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. All required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 75-percent 2-
inch caliper and 25-percent 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees,
planted 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, with five 5-gallon shrubs
per tree, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6. A minimum of one milkweed shrub, or other native nectar species, shall be
planted for every required tree in addition to the required shrubs, and shall be
planted in groups of three or more, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

7. A minimum of 75 percent of the standard building elevations provided shall
include a covered front porch in the front yard with a minimum of 60 square
feet in area and a minimum depth of 6 feet. No porch shall terminate within the
plane of a door or window, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

8. Fences and walls shall be in general conformance with the wall plan and wall
details (wall elevations) date stamped April 1, 2022, as modified by the
following stipulations, and approved by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. Partial view fencing, which may include solid columns up to 24 inches in
width, shall be utilized where walls are proposed around open space
areas, the partial view fencing shall be a maximum 3-foot solid wall and
3-foot view fencing.




Page 228
b. Perimeter walls bounding the rear or side yard property lines of
residential lots along 23rd Avenue, 24th Avenue, and Baseline Road
shall include minimum three-foot offsets, and material and textural
differences, such as stucco, and/or split face or slump block or a
decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

c. The wall layout depicted in the wall details (wall elevations) plan shall be
modified where necessary to accommodate site layout changes that
avoid conflicts with the Zoning Ordinance or City Code requirements.

9. Project entry/exit drives along 23rd and 24th Avenues shall incorporate
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or similar alternative material,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

10. Project entry/exit drives along 23rd and 24th Avenues shall incorporate
enhanced landscaping on both sides planted with a variety of at least three
plant materials, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Each landscaped area shall be a minimum of 250-square feet.

11. A tot lot with shade equipment shall be provided in the central/primary open
space amenity area, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

12. The following shall be provided in each open space amenity area, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department: Modify

a. One picnic area with a barbeque grill, shade ramada, and a picnic table;

b. Two benches or seating features; and

c. A minimum of 6 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through
inverted U, and/or artistic racks. The racks shall be shaded by a tree or
structure and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of
Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K or the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. All sidewalks along 23rd Avenue and 24th Avenue shall be a minimum of 5 feet
in width and detached with a minimum 5-foot wide landscape strip located
between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade
trees planted to provide a minimum of 75% shade, at maturity.




Page 229
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75% live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

14. All sidewalks along Baseline Road shall be a minimum of 6 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 11-foot-wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 75% 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant
shade trees, and minimum 25% 3-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy
drought-tolerant shade trees.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75% live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

15. All sidewalks within the development shall be detached with a minimum 5-foot
wide landscaped strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and shall
include minimum 2-inch caliper single trunk shade trees planted at a rate of
one tree per lot.

a. Where adjacent to open space areas, trees shall be planted a minimum
of 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75% live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

16. The developer shall dedicate a multi-use trail easement (MUTE) along the
north side of Baseline Road and construct a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use
trail (MUT) within the easement in accordance with the MAG supplemental
detail, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. The
developer shall work with the Site Planning section on an alternate design for
this requirement through the technical appeal process.

17. The developer shall dedicate a minimum of 30 feet of right-of-way and
construct the west side of 23rd Avenue, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 230
18. The developer shall dedicate 25 feet of right-of-way for the east side of 24th
Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

19. The existing irrigation facilities along 23rd Avenue are to be undergrounded
and relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land
rights and establish the appropriate process to relocate the facility. Relocations
that require additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to
obtaining plat and or civil plan review approval.

20. The developer shall connect to 23rd Drive, or dedicate a 50-foot radius cul-de-
sac and construct a 45-foot turning radius on site at the termination of 23rd
Drive, as modified and approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

21. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

22. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) to
future owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such
documents shall be according to the templates and instructions provided which
have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

23. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

24. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations

25. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

26. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 Waiver of Claims forms. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.




Page 231
27. Building elevations shall be presented for review and comment to the South
Mountain Village Planning Committee prior to final site plan approval.

28. The developer shall work with the neighborhood and the Street Transportation
Department to pursue traffic mitigation on 23rd Avenue, prior to final site plan
approval, as modified and approved by the Street Transportation Department.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:




Page 232
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 233
EXHIBIT A

PARCEL 1:

THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST
OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA;

EXCEPT THE SOUTH 33 FEET THEREOF;

EXCEPT THAT PORTION AS SET FORTH IN FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION
BY MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDED JULY 15, 2002 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2002-
716983; AND

EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN
DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 297 OF DEEDS, PAGE 84.

PARCEL 2:

THE NORTH ONE THIRD (1/3) OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:

THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST
OF GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

EXCEPT THE SOUTH 239.50 FEET THEREOF.




Page 234
Page 235



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***ITEM CORRECTED (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Amend City Code - Ordinance
Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-45-22-8 - Southeast Corner of 59th Avenue
and Dobbins Road (Ordinance G-7039)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
S-1 (Approved C-2 HGT/WVR PCD) (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved
Intermediate Commercial, Height Waiver, Planned Community District) to C-2
HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (Intermediate Commercial, Height Waiver, Density Waiver) to
allow mixed-use development.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 (Approved C-2 HGT/WVR PCD)
Proposed Zoning: C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR
Acreage: 39.74 acres
Proposal: Mixed-use development

Owner: Tyson Family, LTD, et al.
Applicant: Matrix at Dobbins
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Laveen Village Planning Committee heard this case on July 11, 2022,
and continued the case, by a vote of 8-0. The Laveen Village Planning Committee
heard this case on Aug. 8, 2022, and recommended approval, per the Addendum A
Staff Report, with modifications and an additional stipulation, by a vote of 6-3.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 4, 2022, and continued
the case, by a vote of 9-0.The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022,
and recommended approval, per the Laveen Village Planning Committee
recommendation, with a modification and an additional stipulation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southeast corner of 59th Ave. and Dobbins Road.
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 5703, 5775, 5875 W. Dobbins Road, 9250, 9365 S. 59th Ave.


Page 236


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 237
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT




To: Alan Stephenson Date: October 6, 2022
Deputy City Manager
Planning and Development Director

From: Joshua Bednarek�
Planning and Devetfopment Deputy Director

Subject: CORRECTION TO ITEM 88 ON THE OCTOBER 12, 2022 FORMAL AGENDA -
ORDINANCE ADOPTION OF Z-45-22-8 - SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 59TH
AVENUE AND DOBBINS ROAD (ORDINANCE G-)

Item 88, Rezoning Application Z-45-22-8, is a request to rezone 39.74 acres located at
the southeast corner of 59th Avenue and Dobbins Road, from S-1 (Approved C-2 HGT/
WVR PC D) (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved Intermediate C ommercial,
Height Waiver, Planned Community District) to C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR (Intermediate
C ommercial, Height Waiver, Density Waiver) to allow mixed-use development.

This memo corrects the legal description in the ordinance. The updated legal description
aligns with the areas referenced in the staff stipulations and will assist in administration.
The overall boundaries and acreage of the rezoning area is unchanged.




Approved:
Alan Stephenson
Deputy City Manager/Planning and Development Director




Enclosures:
Updated Draft Ordinance Z-45-22-8
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-45-22-8) FROM S-1 (APPROVED C-2
HGT/WVR PCD) (RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT,
APPROVED INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, HEIGHT WAIVER,
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT) TO C-2 HGT/WVR
DNS/WVR (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, HEIGHT WAIVER,
DENSITY WAIVER).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 39.74-acre property located at the southeast

corner of 59th Avenue and Dobbins Road in a portion of Section 8, Township 1 South,

Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “S-

1 (Approved C-2 HGT/WVR PCD)” (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved

Intermediate Commercial, Height Waiver, Planned Community District) to “C-2

HGT/WVR DNS/WVR” (Intermediate Commercial, Height Waiver, Density Waiver).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped August 8, 2022 and elevations date stamped July 8, 2022, as
modified by the following stipulations and approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

2. Improvements for the Town Square, as identified on the site plan date stamped
August 8, 2022, shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of
occupancy for the last phase of residential development (Lot 2 or Lot 3).
Improvements shall include all streets and parking around the Town Square, all
common landscape, walkway landscape furniture and common area features,
and a minimum of three amenities (which may include, but is not limited to
open seating, interactive water feature, and kids playground with shade
structure), but excluding the two commercial buildings and their supporting
features such as leased outdoor dining areas and their hardscape and
landscape features, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. The primary entryway to Dobbins Road shall include a minimum of 250 square
feet of enhanced landscaping, planted and maintained with a variety of at least
three plant materials including a series of annuals that will each maintain a
constant bloom throughout the year.

4. A minimum of one milkweed shrub, or other native nectar species, shall be
planted for every required tree in addition to the required shrubs, and shall be
planted in groups of three or more, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

5. The developer shall dedicate a 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE)
along the east side of 59th Avenue and construct a minimum 10-foot-wide
multi-use trail (MUT) within the easement in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with
the Site Planning section on an alternate design through the technical appeal
process.

6. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and
minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area located between the back of curb and
sidewalk along the south side of Dobbins Road, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

a. Minimum 3-inch caliper shade trees placed a minimum of 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum
mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 75% live coverage
at maturity.

c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

7. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk along
the west side of 57th Avenue with a minimum 5-foot-wide landscaped strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following
standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees placed a minimum of 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum
mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 50% live coverage
at maturity.

c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

8. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk along
the east side of 59th Avenue with a minimum 11-foot-wide landscaped strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following
standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Minimum 3-inch caliper shade trees placed a minimum of 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum
mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 75% live coverage
at maturity.
c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

9. The developer shall dedicate a minimum of 55-feet of right-of-way and
construct the south side of Dobbins Road, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

10. The developer shall dedicate a minimum of 30-feet of right-of-way and
construct the west side of 57th Avenue connecting at the 56th Glen alignment,
as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

11. The developer shall dedicate a minimum of 55-feet of right-of-way and
construct the east side of 59th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

12. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is approved. Signal warrant analysis shall be included for 59th Avenue and
Dobbins as part of the Study. The developer shall be required to provide a
minimum 25% contribution towards future traffic signal if not warranted for
construction by the TIA.

13. Existing irrigation along Dobbins Road are to be undergrounded and relocated
outside City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land
rights and establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that
require additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to
obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval.

14. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

15. The right-of-way shall be dedicated, and a bus stop pad (City of Phoenix
Standard Details P1258 and P1260) constructed along eastbound Dobbins
Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. The right-of-way shall be dedicated, and a bus stop pad (City of Phoenix
Standard Details P1258 and P1260) constructed along northbound 59th
Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

17. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

18. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.

LOT 1 (TOWN CENTER AND RETAIL PLAZA)

19. The maximum building height shall be 30 feet.

20. A minimum of 28% of the gross area of Lot 1 shall be retained as open space,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

21. All uncovered surface parking lot areas for employees and customers shall be
landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper size large canopy drought tolerant
shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the parking area and
achieve minimum 25% shade at maturity, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

22. A minimum of 14 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall
adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

23. Any future Planning Hearing Officer applications for Lot 1, as depicted on the
site plan date stamped August 8, 2022, shall go to the Village Planning
Committee for recommendation, and include enhanced notification to require
notification of all property owners within 600 feet of the subject site and all
neighborhood organizations registered with the City within one mile of the
subject site.

LOT 2 (MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS)

24. The development shall adhere to the R-3A zoning district standards, as
modified by the following stipulations, and approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

25. Lot 2 shall be limited to a maximum of 214 units.

26. A minimum of 10% of the gross area of Lot 2 shall be retained as open space,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
27. A minimum of 10 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances, amenities, and/or open
space and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix
K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

LOT 3 (HORIZONTAL MULTIFAMILY)

28. The development shall adhere to the R-3 zoning district standards, as modified
by the following stipulations, and approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

29. Lot 3 shall be limited to a maximum of 181 units.

30. A minimum of 11% of the gross area of Lot 3 shall be retained as open space,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

31. A minimum of 10 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances, amenities, and/or open
space and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix
K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
EXHIBIT A

LOT 1:

A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE
GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8, FROM WHICH
THE NORTH QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 59
MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2,633.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH
89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8, A DISTANCE OF 731.98 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00
SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 710.48 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59
MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 736.75 FEET TO THE WEST LINE
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE ALONG SAID
WEST LINE, NORTH 00 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 710.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 521,714 SQUARE FEET OR 11.977 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.

LOT 2:

A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE
GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8, FROM
WHICH THE NORTH QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES
59 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2,633.43 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 8, NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 731.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG
SAID NORTH LINE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 34 SECONDS
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 584.74 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 27
MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 710.58
FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES
58 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 579.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES
00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 710.48 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 413,445 SQUARE FEET OR 9.491 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.

LOT 3:

A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE
GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8, FROM
WHICH THE NORTH QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES
59 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2,633.43 FEET; THENCE
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8,
SOUTH 00 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 06 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 710.39
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES
58 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,315.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00
DEGREES 27 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 609.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
1,315.03 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 00 DEGREES 23
MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 609.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.

SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 801,549 SQUARE FEET OR 18.401 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-45-22-8) FROM S-1 (APPROVED C-2
HGT/WVR PCD) (RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE DISTRICT,
APPROVED INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, HEIGHT WAIVER,
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT) TO C-2 HGT/WVR
DNS/WVR (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, HEIGHT WAIVER,
DENSITY WAIVER).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 39.74-acre property located at the southeast

corner of 59th Avenue and Dobbins Road in a portion of Section 8, Township 1 South,

Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “S-

1 (Approved C-2 HGT/WVR PCD)” (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved

Intermediate Commercial, Height Waiver, Planned Community District) to “C-2

HGT/WVR DNS/WVR” (Intermediate Commercial, Height Waiver, Density Waiver).




Page 238
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped August 8, 2022 and elevations date stamped July 8, 2022, as
modified by the following stipulations and approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

2. Improvements for the Town Square, as identified on the site plan date stamped
August 8, 2022, shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of
occupancy for the last phase of residential development (Lot 2 or Lot 3).
Improvements shall include all streets and parking around the Town Square, all
common landscape, walkway landscape furniture and common area features,
and a minimum of three amenities (which may include, but is not limited to
open seating, interactive water feature, and kids playground with shade
structure), but excluding the two commercial buildings and their supporting
features such as leased outdoor dining areas and their hardscape and
landscape features, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. The primary entryway to Dobbins Road shall include a minimum of 250 square
feet of enhanced landscaping, planted and maintained with a variety of at least
three plant materials including a series of annuals that will each maintain a
constant bloom throughout the year.

4. A minimum of one milkweed shrub, or other native nectar species, shall be
planted for every required tree in addition to the required shrubs, and shall be
planted in groups of three or more, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

5. The developer shall dedicate a 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE)
along the east side of 59th Avenue and construct a minimum 10-foot-wide
multi-use trail (MUT) within the easement in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with




Page 239
the Site Planning section on an alternate design through the technical appeal
process.

6. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and
minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area located between the back of curb and
sidewalk along the south side of Dobbins Road, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

a. Minimum 3-inch caliper shade trees placed a minimum of 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum
mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 75% live coverage
at maturity.

c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

7. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk along
the west side of 57th Avenue with a minimum 5-foot-wide landscaped strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following
standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees placed a minimum of 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum
mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 50% live coverage
at maturity.

c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

8. The developer shall construct a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk along
the east side of 59th Avenue with a minimum 11-foot-wide landscaped strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following
standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. Minimum 3-inch caliper shade trees placed a minimum of 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum
mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 75% live coverage
at maturity.




Page 240
c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning
and Development Department on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

9. The developer shall dedicate a minimum of 55-feet of right-of-way and
construct the south side of Dobbins Road, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

10. The developer shall dedicate a minimum of 30-feet of right-of-way and
construct the west side of 57th Avenue connecting at the 56th Glen alignment,
as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

11. The developer shall dedicate a minimum of 55-feet of right-of-way and
construct the east side of 59th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

12. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is approved. Signal warrant analysis shall be included for 59th Avenue and
Dobbins as part of the Study. The developer shall be required to provide a
minimum 25% contribution towards future traffic signal if not warranted for
construction by the TIA.

13. Existing irrigation along Dobbins Road are to be undergrounded and relocated
outside City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP to identify existing land
rights and establish appropriate process to relocate facility. Relocations that
require additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to
obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval.

14. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

15. The right-of-way shall be dedicated, and a bus stop pad (City of Phoenix
Standard Details P1258 and P1260) constructed along eastbound Dobbins
Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. The right-of-way shall be dedicated, and a bus stop pad (City of Phoenix
Standard Details P1258 and P1260) constructed along northbound 59th
Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

17. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-




Page 241
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

18. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.

LOT 1 (TOWN CENTER AND RETAIL PLAZA)

19. The maximum building height shall be 30 feet.

20. A minimum of 28% of the gross area of Lot 1 shall be retained as open space,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

21. All uncovered surface parking lot areas for employees and customers shall be
landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper size large canopy drought tolerant
shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the parking area and
achieve minimum 25% shade at maturity, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

22. A minimum of 14 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall
adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

23. Any future Planning Hearing Officer applications for Lot 1, as depicted on the
site plan date stamped August 8, 2022, shall go to the Village Planning
Committee for recommendation, and include enhanced notification to require
notification of all property owners within 600 feet of the subject site and all
neighborhood organizations registered with the City within one mile of the
subject site.

LOT 2 (MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS)

24. The development shall adhere to the R-3A zoning district standards, as
modified by the following stipulations, and approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

25. Lot 2 shall be limited to a maximum of 214 units.

26. A minimum of 10% of the gross area of Lot 2 shall be retained as open space,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.




Page 242
27. A minimum of 10 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances, amenities, and/or open
space and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix
K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.

LOT 3 (HORIZONTAL MULTIFAMILY)

28. The development shall adhere to the R-3 zoning district standards, as modified
by the following stipulations, and approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

29. Lot 3 shall be limited to a maximum of 181 units.

30. A minimum of 11% of the gross area of Lot 3 shall be retained as open space,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

31. A minimum of 10 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances, amenities, and/or open
space and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix
K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:




Page 243
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 244
EXHIBIT A

THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4)
OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8, FROM WHICH
THE NORTH QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8 BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 59
MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2,633.43 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1,316.72 FEET;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 30
SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,319.63 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
1,315.03 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
1,320.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 1,736,708 SQUARE FEET OR 39.869 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.




Page 245
Page 246



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO CONTINUE (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Public Hearing - Appeal
of Hearing Officer Decision - Abandonment of Right-of-Way - ABND 220011 -
4640 East Camelback Heights Way

Abandonment: ABND 220011
Project: 99-3459
Abandonment Applicant: Lauren Proper Potter
Date of Abandonment Hearing Officer’s Decision:
Appellant: Benjamin Graff, Quarles & Brady, LLP on Behalf of Kim Komando & Barry
Young

Summary
Rationale: The subject of the abandonment is a portion of land at North Camelback
Canyon Drive and East Camelback Heights Way, located directly across from the
Appellant's home (the “Abandonment Area”). The abandonment was approved on April
14, 2022, despite opposition from the Appellant and a request to continue the case to
allow for further discussions between the neighbors. The Applicant would not agree to
a continuance and the Hearing Officer forwarded a recommendation of approval to the
Way (six parcel owners in total), have expressed opposition. One hundred percent of
the property owners located along Camelback Heights Way, with the exception of the
Applicant, and an additional property owner on Camelback Canyon Drive (directly
north of the Applicant’s home) have joined in this appeal and respectfully request the
Phoenix City Council overturn the Hearing Officer's approval and deny the requested
abandonment.

Location
4640 East Camelback Heights Way
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 247
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT




To: Alan Stephenson Date: October 5, 2022
Deputy City Manager
Planning and Development Director

From: Joshua Bednare��
Planning and Development Deputy Director

Subject:
CONTINUANCE OF ITEM 89 ON THE OCTOBER 12, 2022 FORMAL AGENDA
-PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF HEARING OFFICER DECISION
ABANDONMENT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY - ABND 220011 - 4640 EAST
CAMELBACK HEIGHTS WAY

Item 89, is a request to hold a public hearing on an appeal of the Abandonment Hearing
Officer's decision to approve the abandonment of right-of-way (ABND 220011) located at
4640 East Camelback Heights Way.

Staff request this continuance to ensure requirements for notification are fulfilled and to
allow the applicant and appellant additional time to discuss the request.

Staff recommends continuing this item to the December 7, 2022 City Council Formal
meeting.




Approved:

Alan Stephenson
Deputy City Manager/Planning and Development Director
ATTACHMENT A
ABND 220011-Map




Page 248
ATTACHMENT B




Planning and Development Department




CONDITIONAL APPROVAL – ABND 220011




Your abandonment request was granted CONDITIONAL APPROVAL by Christopher DePerro,
Abandonment Hearing Officer.

This request will NOT be completed until all the stipulations have been met and this request is
formally adopted by City Council. It is the APPLICANT’S RESPONSIBILITY to ensure that all
stipulations are satisfied. Please contact the Abandonment Coordinator at (602) 256-3487 for
questions and notification of your completion of the stipulations.

Upon completion of the stipulations your request will be scheduled for City Council action.

If the stipulations of abandonment are not completed within two years from the date of your
conditional approval (your expiration date is April 14, 2024), this request will then expire. At
that time a new submittal will be required along with the required payment for the abandonment
process. A one-time, one year extension can be requested prior to the expiration date, with
applicable extension fee due.






Page 249
Planning and Development Department


April 14, 2022
Abandonment Staff Report: ABND 220011
Project# 99-3459
Quarter Section: 20-38
Council District: 6



Location: 4640 East Camelback Heights Way


Applicant: Lauren Proper Potter


Request to abandon: The triangular portion of land where North
Camelback Canyon Drive and East
Camelback Heights Way meet as illustrated
on the attached exhibit.



Purpose of request: The applicant states to allow access to the
private residence directly from the roadway
right-of-way, to place responsibility to
maintain vegetation upon the property owner
instead of the City, and to allow the property
owner to provide guest parking on their
property instead of the street.

Hearing date: April 14, 2022






Page 250
Portion of right-of-way proposed for
abandonment




Hearing Summary
Mr. Christopher DePerro, the Abandonment Hearing Officer, called the hearing to order at 9:32
am on April 14, 2022.
Ms. Maggie Dellow, the Abandonment Coordinator introduced the abandonment case ABND
220011 by reading the abandonment case into the record by stating the applicant, location,
abandonment request, and purpose of the request, as well as City staff research.
Mr. DePerro then started the discussion by asking the applicant if they would like to add any
additional comments regarding the abandonment request.
Mr.Charles Huellmantel, the applicant, explained that the proposed abandonment area is a
tough piece of property that doesn’t serve a purpose, nor is maintained, and his client would like
the opportunity to landscape it and beautify it.
Mr. DePerro explained that because this property is hillside there would be a limitation to what
can be done in terms of landscaping and disturbance.




Page 251
Ms. Dellow reviewed the city staff and utility provider comments received during the review
period. Mr. DePerro explained that per the Street Transportation Department’s comments, if the
abandonment received conditional approval, it would only by for a portion of the original
requested area. Mr. Huellmantel confirmed he understood.
Mr. DePerro then invited Mr. Benjamin Graff to provide public comment. Mr. Graff explained that
he represented Kim Commando and Barry Young who lived across the Camelback Heights Way
to the south. Mr. Graff explained that his clients had some concerns about the reasons the
applicant was applying for the abandonment as stated on the application materials, such as to
provide additional access to the property when existing access appears adequate. Mr. Graff
also explained that the application states the abandonment would provide additional guest
parking area, which raised concerns over additional disturbance area and reasons as to why
such an ample amount of guest parking was being sought.
Mr. Graff requested a 30-day continuance on the case so that his client could meet with the
applicant and learn more about the reasons for the request. and reasons for the request.
Ms. Lauren Proper Potter, the applicant, explained that there were no plans for additional work
within the area and there would not be guest parking within the abandonment area. Ms. Potter
stated that the nature of the request was to harmonize vegetation with the redevelopment of the
property.
Mr. DePerro explained that even with the abandonment, the natural vegetation could not be
touched or maintained without being part of the disturbance area. It must remain native and
natural.
Mr. DePerro stated that he did understand Mr. Graff’s concerns, but that these concerns fell
outside of the purview of the abandonment request.
Mr. Graff explained that the only reason those concerns have been brought to the hearing are
due to the fact that they are stated within the applicant’s narrative and rationale on the
abandonment application. Because the applicant stated during the hearing that the reasons for
abandonment as provided on the abandonment application are not accurate, Mr. Graff shared
that he was still confused as to the purpose of the abandonment request and requested
continuance.
Ms. Potter stated that the abandonment would not impact Mr.Graff’s concerns. Mr. Huellmantel
stated that he was not supportive of a continuance.
Mr. DePerro explained that he was having trouble justifying a continuance as the abandonment
request would not result in an additional hillside permissions.
Ms. Dellow then reviewed the staff recommended stipulations of approval.
Mr. DePerro stated that the concerns voiced by the opposition have more to do with hillside and
zoning regulations rather than the abandonment. He further explained that what needs to be
done in an abandonment hearing is determine whether or nit the proposed right-of-way to be
abandoned was need. Mr. DePerro felt that in this case the right-of-way was clearly not needed
and that the proposed abandonment would not permit those things shared by the opposition as
concerns.





Page 252
Mr. Graff agreed that the concerns brought by the opposition were not generally proper for an
abandonment hearing, however they were stated in the abandonment applicant narrative as
reasons for the abandonment.
The Hearing Officer granted a conditional approval subject to stipulations in the staff report.

Stipulations of Conditional Approval
The request of abandonment is conditionally approved by the Abandonment Hearing Officer.
The following stipulations will need to be met:
1. Either a or b shall be complied with:

a. All utilities shall be relocated to locations approved by each affected utility company.
All work is to be done by each affected utility company at no expense to the affected
utility company. An appropriate performance agreement, in an approved form and
cost amount, must be posted with the Planning and Development Department to
guarantee the improvements.

b. All right-of-way shall be retained as a public utilities easement with 24-hour vehicle
maintenance access.

2. Consideration which provides a public benefit to the City is required in accordance with City
Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 and Ordinance G-5332. Cost for abandoned Right-of-Way adjacent
to property not zoned single family residential will be $500 OR Fair Market Value whichever
is greater. Cost for property zoned single family residential is $1.00 a square foot for the
first 500 square feet, $0.10 a square foot thereafter; OR Fair Market Value at the option of
the Planning and Development Director or designee. The applicant shall submit calculation
and fee to Planning and Development Department. The applicant shall request a selection
of approved appraisers from the current list maintained by the Real Estate division of the
Finance Department.

3. No right-of-way within 30-feet of the Camelback Canyon Drive monument line may be
abandoned.

4. No right-of-way south of the existing monument line of Camelback Heights Way may be
abandoned.

5. The right-of-way shall be retained as a slope easement.

6. All stipulations must be completed within two years from the Abandonment Hearing Officer’s
decision.

This conditional approval has been reviewed and approved by the Abandonment Hearing
Officer.



Hearing Officer Signature: ____________________________________ 9/15/22
Date: __________






Page 253
REPORT SUBMITTED BY: Maggie Dellow, Abandonment Coordinator

cc: Lauren Proper Potter, Applicant/Representative
Christopher DePerro, Abandonment Hearing Officer






Page 254
Abandonment
Decision Appeal

In accordance with Section 31-70, Article V of the City Code, the decision of the Abandonment
Hearing Officer regarding the abandonment of public rights-of way may be appealed. Any
decision of the Abandonment Hearing Officer shall be considered final unless a person
aggrieved thereby, files a written Notice of Abandonment Appeal with the Planning &
Development Department within fifteen calendar days after the decision is made. The
completed abandonment appeal form and filing fee* must be submitted to the Planning &
Development Department, Check-In/Information Counter, located at 200 West Washington
Street, 2nd floor, Phoenix, Arizona 85003.

*All fees are pursuant to the current Fee Schedule contained in Appendix A.2. of the
Phoenix City Code.
Appellant’s Name: Benjamin Graff, Quarles & Brady, LLP on Behalf of Kim Komando & Barry Young

Address: 2 N. Central Avenue, 6th Floor City: Phoenix State: AZ Zip: 85004


Phone: (602) 229-5683 Email: Benjamin.Graff@Quarles.com

Affiliation: Attorney for Appellant

Appeal to City Council
Be specific as to what you are appealing. Include the rationale for your appeal. Attachments
may be included.

Abandonment # V- ABND 220011 Date Heard: April 14, 2022

Located at approximately: 4640 E Camelback Heights Way, Phoenix AZ 85018

Abandonment Hearing Officer: Approved Denied

Appealing Decision: Request to Deny Abandonment. See attached Notice of Abandonment Appeal Narrative.



Appealing Stipulation:

Appealing Stipulation:

Appealing Stipulation:

------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Use Only --------------------------------------------------------------
Received By: MDE Receipt #: Date: 4/29/2022
Reviewed By: MDE Receipt #: Date: 4/29/2022

An applicant may receive a clarification from the city of its interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorized substantive
policy statement. To request clarification or to obtain further information on the application process and applicable review time frames, please
call 602-262-7811 or visit our website at http://phoenix.gov/pdd/licensetimes.html. This publication can be made available in alternate formats
(Braille, large print, or digital media) upon request. Contact Planning & Development at (602) 262-7811 voice or (602) 534-5500 TTY.
P:\Abandonment Decision Appeal TRT/DOC/00005
WEB\ EXTERNAL dsd_trt_pdf_00005 Rev. 11/12


Page 255
Renaissance One Attorneys at Law in
Two North Central Avenue Chicago
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2391 Indianapolis
602.229.5200 Madison
Fax 602.229.5690 Milwaukee
www.quarles.com Minneapolis
Naples
Phoenix
Benjamin W. Graff Tampa
Direct Dial: (602) 229-5683 Tucson
E-Mail: Benjamin.Graff@Quarles.com Washington, D.C.




April 29, 2022

VIA EMAIL

Phoenix City Council
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Mayor.Gallego@phoenix.gov
Council.District.6@phoenix.gov


RE: Formal Notice of Abandonment Appeal: ABND 220011

Honorable Mayor Gallego, Councilmember DiCiccio, and Councilmembers,

Our firm represents Ms. Kim Komando and Mr. Barry Young (EK Holdings Delaware, LLC) (the
"Appellant"), the owners of the property located at 4655 E Camelback Heights Way, Phoenix, AZ
85018 within Phoenix Council District 6, in regard to this Notice of Abandonment Appeal of the
April 14, 2022 Hearing Officer approval of Case No. ABND 220011 (the “Abandonment
Application”). In accordance with Section 31-70, Article V of the City Code, the decision of the
Abandonment Hearing Officer regarding the abandonment of public rights-of way may be
appealed. Any decision of the Abandonment Hearing Officer shall be considered final unless a
person aggrieved thereby, files a written Notice of Abandonment Appeal with the Planning &
Development Department within fifteen calendar days after the decision is made. Here, the
Appellant has submitted the requested appeal and requisite filing fee in a timely manner before the
April 29, 2022 5:00 PM deadline.
The subject of the abandonment is a portion of land at North Camelback Canyon Drive and East
Camelback Heights Way, located directly across from the Appellant's home (the “Abandonment
Area”). See Aerial Maps Attached at Tab A. The abandonment was approved on April 14, 2022,
despite opposition from the Appellant and a request to continue the case to allow for further
discussions between the neighbors. The Applicant would not agree to a continuance and the
Hearing Officer forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council. Since April 14,
2022, the entire neighborhood along Camelback Heights Way (six parcel owners in total), have
expressed opposition. See Opposition Map Attached at Tab B. 100% of the property owners
located along Camelback Heights Way, with the exception of the Applicant, and an additional


QB\73627440.1

Page 256
ABND 220011 Notice of Abandonment Appeal

property owner on Camelback Canyon Drive (directly north of the Applicant’s home) have joined
in this appeal and respectfully request the Phoenix City Council overturn the Hearing Officer's
approval and deny the requested abandonment. See Letters of Opposition from Six Parcel Owners
Attached at Tab C.
Site History
City records show the subject right-of-way was dedicated through the Camelback Heights Plat,
recorded on December 16, 1956 on docket 69, page 49 of the Maricopa County Recorder. If
abandoned, the right-of-way will be conveyed back in ownership to the Applicant. This appeal
does not question to whom the abandoned area should be conveyed to if approved, but instead,
that the loss of naturally vegetated public right-of-way combined with the Applicant’s intended
use of the Abandonment Area, is detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood. As is further
discussed, the proposed abandonment also conflicts with the goals of the neighborhood as a whole
to privatize Camelback Heights Way and install a private access gate.
The Abandonment Should be Denied for Lack of Proper Notice, Petition Signatures, and
Failure to Communicate with the Appellant Prior to the April 14, 2022 Abandonment
Hearing.
The City of Phoenix Abandonment process does not include a robust notification procedure, which
frequently results in concerned neighbors being informed of abandonments at the last minute by
signage or through word-of-mouth. However, the City also requires an abandonment petition to
be signed by “one hundred percent of the property owners in and/or abutting the affected area.”
See Abandonment, Right-of-Way Petition included within Applicant’s Application Attached at
Tab D. In this case, the Appellant’s home (Parcel No. 171-16-017A), as well as Parcel Nos. 171-
16-007 and 171-16-006, are located directly adjacent to the Abandonment Area. In fact, the
Appellant’s home and view looking directly Northwest includes the Abandonment Area. Despite
these facts, the Abandonment Petition provided by the Applicant only includes a single signature
– the Applicant’s signature. The petition fails to include signatures from the other affected parcels
and therefore the Applicant failed to provide proper notice.
Additionally, prior to the April 14, 2022 Abandonment Hearing, the Applicant informed the
Appellant that their son would be contacting them prior to the hearing to discuss the abandonment.
But as the hearing began on April 14th, the Appellant had not received any communication from
the Applicant.
Finally, it should be noted that during the April 14, 2022 Abandonment Hearing, the Appellant
requested a continuance to allow the parties time to discuss the request, before it was forwarded to
the City Council for final approval. The Applicant refused to agree to a continuance and the
Hearing Officer forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council, notwithstanding the
strong opposition present the hearing. The refusal to allow for a continuance forced the hand of
the Appellant, and the other six surrounding property owners, to file this appeal. Now, the only
equitable measure is for the City Council to deny the requested abandonment before the resulting
use and disturbance of the area creates irreparable harm to the neighborhood.



QB\73627440.1

Page 257
ABND 220011 Notice of Abandonment Appeal

The Neighbors Are Opposed to the Proposed Use of the Right-of-Way, the Detrimental
Impact on the Neighborhood, and the Interference With the Long-Term Goal of Privatizing
Camelback Heights Way
The property owners along Camelback Heights Way have recently begun discussions to privatize
this road and construct a private access gate near the convergence of Camelback Canyon Drive
and Camelback Heights Way. See Map of Approximate Locations of the Access Gate Attached
at Tab A. The Applicant was fully aware of this intent prior to submitting the abandonment
application. The privatization of the road will require coordination between the neighbors and
notably, coordination with the City of Phoenix on the use (via a revocable permit) and
abandonment of any public right-of-way to allow for the privatization of the road and the
construction of the access gate. Despite these ongoing discussions, the Applicant’s request seeks
to utilize the public right-of-way for the Applicant’s sole benefit, while also moving the
Applicant’s driveway closer to the intersection of Camelback Canyon Drive and Camelback
Heights Way in conflict with possible locations for the access gate. The requested abandonment
should be denied thereby allowing all property owners along Camelback Heights Way to discuss
and agree upon what is beneficial for the neighborhood, rather than this unilateral request which
only benefits the Applicant.
The Abandonment Should be Denied Because Applicant’s Abandonment Narrative and
Submitted Site Plans Confirm the Applicant's Intent to Use the Abandonment Area for an
Access Driveway, Guest Parking, and Disturbed/New Vegetation.
An Examination of the Applicant’s Abandonment Application and Narrative
The proposed Abandonment Application No. ABND 220011 requested to abandon a portion of
land where North Camelback Canyon Drive and East Camelback Heights Way meet, as shown on
the attached Abandonment Aerial Map Exhibit at Tab A. The Applicant provided a narrative along
with the abandonment application which provided justifications for the request. See Applicant's
Narrative Dated February 14, 2022 Attached at Tab D. The City of Phoenix also issued a Staff
Report. See Abandonment Staff Report Dated April 14, 2022 Attached at Tab E.
As is discussed in detail in this section, the Appellant was surprised by the discrepancies between
the written narrative and the Applicant’s statements made during the April 14th, 2022 Hearing.
The Applicant’s testimony also directly conflicts with the site plan submitted to the City by the
Applicant, which is further discussed in this appeal. While the Applicant stated during the hearing
that the Abandonment Area would be left undisturbed with its existing natural desert vegetation,
the Applicant’s own narrative and site plan tell the story of significant disturbance and an extended
driveway within the Abandonment Area. After a review of the Abandonment Application, Staff
Report, Hearing and prior submittals, the Appellant is able to clarify the Applicant’s intent for the
Abandonment Area.
First, the Applicant’s Right-of-Way Petition states the Applicant supports the abandonment
because it “allows access from the driveway to occur directly from the street right-of-way instead
of across the additional City-owned land.” In response to this and similar statements within the
Applicant’s narrative, the City’s Staff Report also states, “[t]he applicant states [the purpose is] to

QB\73627440.1

Page 258
ABND 220011 Notice of Abandonment Appeal

allow access to the private residence directly from the roadway right-of-way, to place
responsibility to maintain vegetation upon the property owner instead of the City, and to allow the
property owner to provide guest parking on their property instead of the street.” See the
Abandonment Application attached at Tab D and Staff Report attached at Tab E.
Regarding parking and the expansion of the driveway, Applicant’s Abandonment Application
states, “[i]ncorporating the City’s right-of-way into the subject property will allow a longer
driveway with room for a guest parking area that will increase safety for all residents in this area
and their visitors.” Contrary to the Applicant’s own narrative, the Applicant stated during the
Hearing that there would be no additional disturbance, driveway expansion, or parking in the
proposed Abandonment Area. Based on the Applicant’s testimony, the Hearing Officer forwarded
his recommendation of approval to City Council. But it is the Appellant’s position that if the
Hearing Officer had been provided copies of the Applicant's site plan, the proposed driveway
extension and disturbed land within the Abandonment Area shown on the plan may have resulted
in a recommendation of denial.
An Examination of the Applicant’s Site Plan Submittals to the City of Phoenix

In order to accurately compare the hearing testimony with the proposed construction of Applicant’s
home, the Appellant made two separate requests to the Applicant to provide copies of the most
current proposed site plan for the Applicant’s home and driveway configuration. Each time the
Applicant stated the site plans would be provided. However, as of the date of this appeal, the
Applicant has not provided any documents or site plans to the Appellant. After filing a public
records request with the City and confirming with City Staff, the Appellant was able to locate the
most recent site plan dated September 20, 2021. This site plan was reviewed during the
Applicant’s prior Hillside Waiver (DSAP 21252) Hearing on January 19, 2022. See Site Plan
Dated September 20, 2021 Attached at Tab F. Three months have passed since the DSAP Hearing
and based on available public records, the Applicant has not submitted a more recent site plan. We
were also able to locate an identical site plan submitted by the Applicant as part of Zoning
Adjustment Case No. ZA-570-21, which requested a setback variance along the eastern property
line. The site plan for this variance case also shows the same expanded driveway and disturbed
area. See Variance Site Plan Dated September 20, 2021 Attached at Tab G. All written statements
in the Applicant’s Abandonment Application Narrative regarding the expanding driveway, guest
parking, and disturbed vegetation are consistent with the site plans submitted as part of Case Nos.
DSAP 21252 and ZA-570-21. As mentioned above, the Applicant’s testimony during the
Abandonment Hearing stated there would be no additional disturbance, driveway, or parking in
the proposed Abandonment Area. However, after examining the Desert Sky Residence Survey
ROW diagram provided by City of Phoenix Abandonment Staff with the most recent site plan, it
is clear the proposed driveway runs through the proposed abandonment area. See Survey ROW &
Site Plan Comparison attached at Tab H. This comparison exhibit shows the Applicant intends to
remove the natural vegetation within the abandonment area and install an elongated mass of
pavement to serve as a driveway and additional parking. Thus, after a review of the facts,
Applicant’s purpose for the abandonment request within the Abandonment Hearing Application



QB\73627440.1

Page 259
ABND 220011 Notice of Abandonment Appeal

and prior site plan submittals does not align with the statements made at the April 14th, 2022
Hearing.
The Applicant’s proposed use of public right-of-way, which currently benefits all residents, also
does not align with the goals of the united property owners along Camelback Heights Way. The
Appellant and the six additional property owners joining in this appeal firmly believe the
disturbance and replacement of this naturally vegetated area with the proposed driveway will only
serve as a detriment which is incompatible with the goal to beautify and privatize Camelback
heights Way.
Conclusion
This Notice of Abandonment Appeal serves to memorialize and provide evidence of the
differences between the Applicant's verbal testimony which lead to the Hearing Officer's approval,
and the documented intent of the Applicant to not only remove vegetation from the Abandonment
Area, but also place an elongated driveway within the same area. After a review of the facts and
confirmation of evidence showing the discrepancy between Applicant’s testimony and the
narrative/site plans submitted to the City, we respectfully request that the Phoenix City Council
reverse the decision of the Abandonment Hearing Officer and deny the Abandonment Application.
Our firm can provide additional information as requested by the City. Thank you for your time and
consideration.


Very truly yours,

QUARLES & BRADY LLP




Benjamin W. Graff




QB\73627440.1

Page 260
TAB A




Page 261
APPLICANT’S PROPOSED ABANDONMENT AREA AERIAL MAP




Page 262




ABANDONMENT APPLICANT APN: 171-16-009
4640 E CAMELBACK HEIGHTS WAY PHOENIX ARIZONA 85018
APPLICANT’S APPROVED ABANDONMENT AREA AERIAL MAP




Page 263




ABANDONMENT APPLICANT APN: 171-16-009
4640 E CAMELBACK HEIGHTS WAY PHOENIX ARIZONA 85018
APPLICANT’S PROPERTY VS APPELLANT’S PROPERTY




Applicant
Property

Approved
Page 264


Requested
Appellant
Property




APPLICANT APN: 171-16-009
APPELLANT APN: 171-16-017A
OPTIONS FOR LOCATIONS OF NEW ACCESS GATE




Option
Page 265

Option
3 Option




ABANDONMENT APPLICANT APN: 171-16-009
4640 E CAMELBACK HEIGHTS WAY PHOENIX ARIZONA 85018
TAB B




Page 266
OPPOSED NEIGHBORS AERIAL MAP




Page 267




APN: 171-16-017A; 171-16-018E; 171-16-018J; 171-16-025G; 171-16-
025E; 171-16-016A; 171-16-010
TAB C




Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
TAB D




Page 275
Abandonment
Application

This application must be submitted to start the process to abandon any public rights-of-way and/or easements
controlled by the city of Phoenix. A completed application must be submitted, together with a sketch of the area
to be abandoned and the appropriate fee to the Planning & Development Department, 200 West Washington
Street (2nd floor), Phoenix, Arizona 85003. For additional information, call (602) 256-3487.

Applicant: ___________________________________________________________________________________
Address: ____________________________________________________________________________________
City: ____________________________________ State: _________________ Zip: __________________
Phone: _____________________________________ Email: ________________________________________
Contact (If other than Applicant): ________________________________________________________________
Address: ____________________________________________________________________________________
City: _______________________________________ State: _________________ Zip: __________________
Phone: _____________________________________ Email: ________________________________________

APN# of Parcel(s) Adjacent to Requested Abandonment: _____________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Name of Street(s) to be abandoned: ______________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Location/Description of Alley(s) or Easement(s) to be Abandoned (please be specific):
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Quarter Section #: __________ Zoning District: _________ Village: ________________________________

Reason to Abandon (additional pages may be attached): _____________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------- St aff U se O n l y --------------------------------------------------------------

Abandonment #: ___________ Folder #: _________ Total Abandonment Application Fee: $ ____________
Submittal Date: ________________________ Informal Abandonment (w/o hearing): $ _______________
Reviewed By: ________________________ Abandonment, Non-Single Family: $ _________________
Annexation Date: _______________________ Abandonment, Single Family: _______________________
Site Plan # (if applicable): ________________ Appraisal Section Notified: Yes No N/A


An applicant may receive a clarification from the city of its interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorized substantive
policy statement. To request clarification or to obtain further information on the application process and applicable review time frames, please
call 602-262-7811 or visit our website at http://phoenix.gov/pdd/licensetimes.html. This publication can be made available in alternate formats
(Braille, large print, or digital media) upon request. Contact Planning & Development at (602) 262-7811 voice or (602) 534-5500 TTY.
P:\Abandonment Application TRT/DOC/00078A
WEB\ EXTERNAL dsd_trt_pdf_00078A Rev.

Page 276
       






H 
  &
A 
 $    !%        #! ! !#"




Page 277

'$/1./$138.6-$1 3  ,$+! "*$(&'32 82$$*23'$ ! -#.-,$-3.%3'$(38
1(&'3.%6 8!$36$$- ,$+! "* -8.-1(5$ -# ,$+! "*$(&'32 83. ++.6 ""$223.
3'$/1(5 3$1$2(#$-"$#(1$"3+8%1.,3'$1. #6 81(&'3.%6 8

'$1(&'3.%6 83'$/1./$138.6-$12$$*23. ! -#.- //$ 123.!$ 1$,- -3 +$%3.5$1 %1., 
/1$5(.42  ! -#.-,$-3  3. "".,,.# 3$3'$1$ +(&-,$-3.% ,$+! "*$(&'32
89 /1$5(.42+8.13$11(5$9 (-3.(32"411$-3".-%(&41 3(.- '$(, &$!$+.6#$/("323'$
24!)$"3/1./$138.43+(-$#(-3$ + -#3'$1(&'3.%6 83'$/1./$138.6-$12$$*23.' 5$
! -#.-$#.43+(-$#6(3' 8$++.6# 2'$#+(-$




'$24!)$"3 /1./$138(2+." 3$# +.-& ,$+! "*$(&'32 8 -#"411$-3+8 ' 2 /.13(.-.%(32
#1(5$6 8+." 3$#(-3'$ #) "$-31(&'3.%6 8 #4$3.3'$$731$,$&1 #$.% ,$+! "*$(&'32
86'("'(-"1$ 2$2-$ 1+8 : +.-&3'$%1.-3 &$.%3'$/1./$138/ 13("4+ 1+8 23'$231$$3
".-3(-4$24/3'$,.4-3 (-'(2 1$  //$ 123.!$ /.13(.-.%3'$.1(&(- ++8/+ --$# +(&-,$-3
.% ,$+! "*$(&'32 8! 2$#.-3'$ /+ 32'.6-!$+.6




Page 278
'(2 1. #6 8 +(&-,$-36 2,.#(%($#(- 6(3' / 13( + ! -#.-,$-3!433'$2+(5$13'$
/1./$138 .6-$12$$*23. ! -#.- -.66 2+$%3 2(38.6-$#1(&'3.%6 8

 ,$+! "*$(&'32 8 2(3$7(2323.# 8(-"+4#$2"41!(-&3' 36 2(-23 ++$# 33'$$7/$-2$.%
3'$/1$5(.42/1./$138.6-$1 33'$24!)$"3/1./$138 26$++ 23'$-$(&'!.1(-&/1./$1383.
(-"1$ 2$3'$2 %$38.%3'$$7(23(-&231$$33#.$2-.3 //$ 13'$1$ 1$%4341$/+ -23.,.#(%83'$
+(&-,$-3.% ,$+! "*$(&'32 8 -# "".1#(-&+8 2$$,2,.23 //1./1( 3$3. ++.63'$
/1./$138.6-$1 #) "$-33.3'$1(&'3.%6 83.(-".1/.1 3$ (3(-3.3'$(1/1./$1383. ++.6#(1$"3
""$22%.13'$(1#1(5$6 8%1.,3'$1. #6 8(-23$ #.%"1.22(-&.-3.(38.6-$#1(&'3.%6 8

413'$1,.1$3'(2/+ "$23'$1$2/.-2(!(+(383., (-3 (- 3'$5$&$3 3(.-(-3'(2 1$ 4/.-3'$
/1./$138.6-$1(-23$ #.%3'$(386'("'6(++ ++.6(33.!$,.1$/1./$1+8 -#".'$2(5$+8
, (-3 (-$#




Page 279
 23+83'$ ! -#.-,$-36.4+# ++.63'$/1./$138.6-$13./1.5(#$&4$23/ 1*(-&.-3'$(1
/1./$138(-23$ #.%3'$231$$3+3'.4&'(3(2/$1,(33$#3' 3&4$232.% ++/1./$13($2, 8/ 1*.-
3'$/4!+("231$$33'$$731$,$2+./$ -#- 11.6".-%(&41 3(.-.% ,$+! "*$(&'32 8+$ #2
3.4-2 %$".-#(3(.-2 23'$231$$3(2-.36(#$$-.4&'3. "".,,.# 3$36.6 831 %%("6'$-3'$1$
1$5$'("+$2/ 1*$#.-3'$231$$3'$"415 341$.%3'$1. #6 8 -#$+$5 3(.--$& 3(5$+8(,/ "32
5(2(!(+(386'$-5$'("+$2 1$+." 3$#.-3'$231$$3-".1/.1 3(-&3'$(38:21(&'3.%6 8(-3.3'$
24!)$"3/1./$1386(++ ++.6 +.-&$1#1(5$6 86(3'1..,%.1 &4$23/ 1*(-& 1$ 3' 36(++
(-"1$ 2$2 %$38%.1 ++1$2(#$-32(-3'(2 1$  -#3'$(15(2(3.12

.13'$1$ 2.-22$3%.13'6$!$+($5$3'(21$04$23%.1 - ! -#.-,$-3(2 //1./1( 3$' -*8.4
%.18.41".-2(#$1 3(.-






Page 280
Abandonment, Right-of-Way
Petition

A signed right-of-way abandonment petition must be submitted when filing your abandonment application. Please
read the entire form before signing. For additional information, contact the Planning and Development
Department at (602) 256-3487.
We, as property owners, support the proposed abandonment for the following reasons:
It will help to increase security,
It will increase the buildable area of the lot(s),
It will remove unnecessary right-of-way or easements to permit development of the property, or
Other:
We, as property owners, understand that if there are public utilities located within the area to be abandoned, all
right-of-way within the proposed abandonment area shall be retained as a public utilities easement (PUE) or as
may be modified by the affected utility companies with 24-hour vehicle maintenance access. We further
understand that no structure of any kind shall be constructed or placed within the easement except removable-
type fencing and/or paving. Removable type fencing must not require the installation of footers within the PUE.
No planting within the PUE unless approved by the City of Phoenix. The affected utility company shall not be
required to replace any obstructions, paving or planting that must be removed during the course of
required maintenance, reconstruction and/or construction.
Or
We, as property owners, understand that we may choose to relocate all utilities affected by the abandonment. If
we choose this alternative, we understand that we, as the property owners, would be responsible for the cost of
relocating any affected utilities to locations approved by that utility company.
To ensure continued maintenance and repairs of the street, the public rights-of-way would be abandoned
to the adjacent individual property owner(s) or a Homeowners Association where one exists. The
Homeowners Association or adjacent individual property owners would assume all liability and
maintenance cost of the abandoned public right-of-way and any improvements.
We, as the property owners, understand that if the abandonment of the public right-of-way is approved, the
Homeowners Association (or individual property owners) shall purchase all streetlights from the City of Phoenix in
the proposed abandonment area, or the Homeowners Association (or individual property owners) will be
responsible for replacing them with private lighting. This will be done at no expense to the City of Phoenix. We
also understand that the Homeowners Association (or individual property owners) will be responsible for and set
up their own electric account with the proper electric company in order to assume the responsibility of payment of
the electric costs.
We, as the property owners, understand that there may be additional costs incurred due to required
improvements to provide code compliant entrances/gating, etc. Requirements may include, but are not limited to,
gates, provisions for fire apparatus, dedicated right-of-way for required turnarounds, etc.

Any and all requirements and costs will be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association (or individual
property owners). All required improvements within the proposed abandonment area, as required by the
stipulations of the approved abandonment, will be completed at no expense to the City of Phoenix.

Per Phoenix City Code, Section 31-64 (e), if the request of abandonment is approved there will be a
consideration fee due and payable after the Abandonment Hearing Officer’s decision. Consideration fees are the
costs associated with purchasing land within the abandoned right-of-way from the City of Phoenix and are
calculated as follows:
Non-single family zoned right-of-way the greater of $500 or Fair Market Value (FMV)¹ of abandoned right-of-way
Single family residential zoned right-of-way $1 per square foot for first 500 square feet, $0.10 per square foot
thereafter; or FMV of abandoned right-of-way, as determined by City²
Notes:
¹ If the area to be abandoned is within or adjacent to an established redevelopment area, consideration may be
given in determining the FMV.
² For the area to be abandoned, consideration may be given to the transfer of ongoing property maintenance
responsibilities in determining the Abandonment Consideration Fee.

This publication can be made available in alternate formats (Braille, large print, computer diskette, or audiotape)
upon request. Contact the Planning & Development Department at (602) 262-7811 voice or (602) 534-5500 TTY.
P:\Abandonment, Right-of-Way Petition Page 281 TRT/DOC/00078E
WEB\ EXTERNAL dsd_trt_pdf_00078E 126-14D Rev.
"## !# # #  #
 #  "# # #### 



$!#+2#++;+5$$5$+*; 5$5$+*;06$2)*5;206$2;,2$+2;5+;%&$*!; +2;*+*)*5;
9'J,D9&?'&J<'@$'9CJ:(JC,'J?"9B<:?C"C.:9J'<"@C7'9CJ 7DBCJ#'J9:C.(.'&J

525; *+*)*5; 5$5%+*;06$2)*5;4$!*5624; 72$$;6-+*;,.&$5$+*; +2;*+*)*5;
I 9'J,D9&?'&J<'?$'9CJ:(JBE<<:?CJ.)J):D?J:@J ('G'?J<@:<'?C.'BJ"?'J.77'&."C'4HJ.7<"$C'&
I G:C,.?&BJ:(JC,'J?'B.&'9C."5J<@:<'?CHJ:G9'?BJ:?J"J7"1:?.CHJ:(JC,'J$:77'?$0"4J.77'&-"C'5HJ.7<"$C'&

:7<5-"9$'JG.C,JC,'J"#:F'J<'C.C.:9J@'=D.@'7'9CJ&:'BJ9:CJ+D"?"9C''J"<D'BC J CJ:95HJ"55:GBJ(:@JC,'J
BD#7.CC"6J :)JC,'J#"9&:97'9CJ<<5.$"C.:9J

'J "BJC,'J"&2"$'9CJ               

"BJB,:G9J.9JC,'J"CC"$,'&J7"
 ; ; ; ;  ;   ;
JJ"8'5#"%3J'/+,CBJ"HJ      




:;*+*$*";5#;/6'$;2$"#5+8:; 2;'(; 45$/6'5%+*4;#7;*;)5; 5#; $5:;+;#+*$9;
3'$*16$4#4;$54;+8*24#$/;*;6562;+'$"5$+*4;




Page 282
TAB E




Page 283
Planning and Development Department


April 14, 2022
Preliminary Abandonment Staff Report: ABND 220011
Project# 99-3459
Quarter Section: 20-38
Council District: 6



Location: 4640 East Camelback Heights Way


Applicant: Lauren Proper Potter


Request to abandon: The triangular portion of land where North
Camelback Canyon Drive and East
Camelback Heights Way meet as illustrated
on the attached exhibit.



Purpose of request: The applicant states to allow access to the
private residence directly from the roadway
right-of-way, to place responsibility to
maintain vegetation upon the property owner
instead of the City, and to allow the property
owner to provide guest parking on their
property instead of the street.

Hearing date: April 14, 2022






Page 284
Portion of right-of-way proposed for
abandonment




City Staff Research
Staff research shows that the subject right-of-way was dedicated through the Camelback
Heights Plat, recorded on December 16, 1956 on docket 69, page 49 of the Maricopa County
Recorder. If abandoned, the right-of-way will be conveyed back in ownership to the abutting
property owner.

City Staff Comments
This request was routed to various City departments for their recommendations. Listed below
are the responses from each department.

Street Transportation Department – Maja Brkovic

1. No right-of-way within 25-feet of the Camelback Canyon Drive monument line may be
abandoned.

2. No right-of-way with 25-feet of the Camelback Heights Way monument lines may be
abandoned.

PDD Traffic Department – Derek Fancon
“Recommend approval.”

PDD Site Planning – Maggie Dellow



Page 285
“PDD Site Planning would like to ensure the customer understands the abandonment will not
grant any additional disturbance. The Hillside Waiver (DSAP 21252) for this site approved a
total disturbance of 16,680 sf. The abandonment will not increase this allowance. If the
customer wants more disturbance, the City would require a new hillside waiver submittal.”

Street Lights – Jason Fernandez
“Recommend approval.”

Water Services – Don Reynolds
“A 25’ ft. portion of the right of way shall be retained as water easement for the existing water
main with 24-hour maintenance access subject to the following standard stipulation:

No structure of any kind and/or block wall shall be constructed or placed within the easement
except wood or wire fencing and/or paving. No planting except grass and/or approved
ground cover shall be placed within the easement. It shall be further understood that the City
of Phoenix shall not be required to replace any obstructions, paving or planting that must be
removed during the course of required maintenance, reconstruction and/or construction.”

PDD Village Planner – Sarah Stockham
No comments received.

Public Transit Department – Michael Dwyer
“The abandonment will not affect solid waste service.”

PDD Civil Department – Todd Coy
“Recommend approval.”

Neighborhood Services – Lynda Lee
No comments received.

Utility Comments
The request was also routed to outside utility companies for their input. Listed below are the
responses from each utility.
Cox – Zach Lawson
“I have reviewed the abandonment request at ABND 220011 4640 E CAMELBACK HEIGHTS
WAY in Phoenix, {Maricopa County}, AZ. Based upon the supplied drawings/exhibits that you’ve
submitted it has been determined that COX has no facilities within the easements and therefore
we approve your request to abandon.
Please note that although Cox Communications approves this abandonment, we do so with the
understanding that we will not assume any construction, relocation and/or repairs costs
associated or in result of this abandonment.”
Southwest Gas – Tami Garcia
“After reviewing the plans for the above-referenced project, it has been determined that a gas
line lies within the area in question. We require that a clearance of at least two feet be
maintained between the gas line and other underground facilities. The procedure requires
calling Blue Stake at 602-263-1100 and following their excavation instructions to determine the





Page 286
exact location of the gas line. Permission is granted to abandon a portion of the right-of-way on
the area located at the above-referenced location under those conditions.”

Arizona Public Service – James Generoso
“APS has no objection to the abandonment proposed in ABND220011.”

CenturyLink – Mary Hutton
“Qwest Corporation d/b/a CENTURYLINK QC (“CenturyLink”) has reviewed the request for the
subject vacation/abandonment and has determined that it has no objections with respect to the
areas proposed at this project site.

It is the intent and understanding of CenturyLink that this notice shall not reduce our rights to
any other existing easement or rights we have on this site or in the area.

This vacation response is submitted WITH THE STIPULATION that if CenturyLink facilities are
found within the vacated area as described, the Applicant will relocate the facilities at
Applicant's expense and within guidelines set by CenturyLink and all regulating entities. All
relocations will be done under the supervision of a CenturyLink Inspector.”

Salt River Project – Sherry Wagner
“Salt River Project has no objection the abandonment of the triangular portion of land where
Camelback Canyon Drive and Camelback Heights Way meet as shown in your application
ABND220011. This is in the Arizona Public Service serving area”


Staff Recommended Stipulations of Approval
The request of abandonment, if approved by the Abandonment Hearing Officer, will be subject
to the following stipulations:
1. Either a or b shall be complied with:

a. All utilities shall be relocated to locations approved by each affected utility company.
All work is to be done by each affected utility company at no expense to the affected
utility company. An appropriate performance agreement, in an approved form and
cost amount, must be posted with the Planning and Development Department to
guarantee the improvements.

b. All right-of-way shall be retained as a public utilities easement with 24-hour vehicle
maintenance access.

2. Consideration which provides a public benefit to the City is required in accordance with
City Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 and Ordinance G-5332. Cost for abandoned Right-of-Way
adjacent to property not zoned single family residential will be $500 OR Fair Market
Value whichever is greater. Cost for property zoned single family residential is $1.00 a
square foot for the first 500 square feet, $0.10 a square foot thereafter; OR Fair Market
Value at the option of the Planning and Development Director or designee. The applicant
shall submit calculation and fee to Planning and Development Department. The
applicant shall request a selection of approved appraisers from the current list
maintained by the Real Estate division of the Finance Department.




Page 287
3. No right-of-way within 30-feet of the Camelback Canyon Drive monument line may be
abandoned.

4. No right-of-way south of the existing monument line of Camelback Heights Way may be
abandoned.

5. The right-of-way shall be retained as a slope easement.

6. All stipulations must be completed within two years from the Abandonment Hearing
Officer’s decision.


For assistance regarding the above stipulations, please contact the Abandonment
Coordinator at 602-256-3487.

REPORT SUBMITTED BY: Maggie Dellow, Abandonment Coordinator

cc: Lauren Proper Potter, Applicant/Representative
Christopher DePerro, Abandonment Hearing Officer




If the area to be abandoned is within or adjacent to a redevelopment area established pursuant
to A.R.S.§36-1471 ET.SEQ., Consideration may be given to the restrictions upon the property
and the covenants, conditions and obligations assumed by the redeveloper in the determination
of fair market value.



Page 288
TAB )




Page 289
Hillside Grading Waiver Appeal
Application


Phoenix City Code Section 32-32
DATE

Please be advised if there is a rezoning case in process on the subject property a
Technical Appeal cannot be filed until the case has been acted on by City Council.
Note that an appeal meeting with staff will be arranged in approximately 1 week. DSAP #

Please indicate your preference in attending this meeting: Yes No

PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS OR LOCATION PROJECT #


OWNERS NAME ADDRESS ZIP CODE PHONE


APPLICANT'S NAME (NOT COMPANY NAME) APPLICANT'S ADDRESS SUITE NUMBER PHONE


APPLICANT'S E-MAIL ADDRESS P&D STAFF FAMILIAR WITH PROJECT


RELATIONSHIP TO PROJECT AND COMPANY NAME


A request is hereby made for an appeal, to Section(s) _________________________________________
of the Ordinance and/or Code, which require(s) that: (use attachment if necessary):
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
State the factual and/or legal basis for the appeal. Include the alternate design and design parameters based on a
recognized standard and the reason(s) why the proposed appeal meets the intent of the Phoenix City Code Section
32-32 C (5)(d)(1):
(use attachment if necessary): _________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________



_______________________________________________ ______________________________________________
If applicant is not the owner or the owner’s architect or Applicant’s Signature Title
engineer, owner’s signature must appear on line above

FOR CITY USE ONLY
Technical Lead Print Name __________________________________ Fee Code __________________

APPROVED APPROVED WITH STIPULATIONS DENIED

Attendees: __________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________________


_____________________________ ________________________________________________________________
DATE CITY MANAGER’S REPRESENTATIVE OR DELEGATE





An applicant may receive a clarification from the city of its interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorized substantive
policy statement. To request clarification or to obtain further information on the application process and applicable review time frames, please
call 602-262-7811 or visit our website at http://phoenix.gov/pdd/licensetimes.html. This publication can be made available in alternate formats
upon request. Contact Planning & Development at (602) 262-7811 voice or (602) 534-5500 TTY.

S:\Appeal Application, Hillside Grading Waiver TRT/DOC/00055
WEB:dsd_trt_pdf_00055 New 9/14



Page 290
Hillside Grading Waiver Appeal Application – Page 2 of 2 TRT/DOC/00055




Pre-log Checklist:

Hillside Grading Waiver
Phoenix City Code Section 32-32.

Initial Appeal to City Manager's Representative
 3 copies of narrative and graphic exhibit describing applicant proposal and basis for
appeal.
 Photographs: On-site, adjacent to site within 300.'
 List of property owners within 300' of site. Please contact Maricopa County Assessors
website at http://www.maricopa.gov/Assessor/GIS/Map.html.
 Install Autodesk MapGuide (R) Viewer Active X Control) to obtain a list of property
owners.
 Verification must be provided that owners have been notified by certified letter at least
15 days prior to the hearing.
 Dimensioned single-family plot plan or site plan/subdivision.
 Hillside calculations (See Hillside Grading Waiver Submittal Requirements).
Total Lot Area: _______________ SF Total Hillside Area: ________________ SF
Total Area under Roof: ________________ SF (From total lot) _______________ %
Proposed Under Roof: _______________ SF
Total Area Disturbed Beyond Roof: ____________ SF
Total % of Hillside Disturbed: ______ %
 If administrative approval to be done by City Manager Representative, the property
must be posted for a period of 15 days prior to the administrative approval date. It shall
be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the posting remains in place for the
entire 15 day period.
 Fee(s) per Chapter 9, Appendix A.2 of Phoenix City Code are:
 $600.00 first appeal item plus - SPAPPCM
 $300.00 each additional appeal item

Subsequent Appeal to Development Advisory Board
 Must submit appeal request within 10 days of the CMR decision.
 1 copy of City Manager’s Representative decision.
 Fee(s) per Chapter 9, Appendix A.2 of Phoenix City Code are:
 $600.00 first appeal item plus - SPAPPDAB
 $300.00 each additional appeal item




Page 291
Page 292
TAB *




Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
TAB +




Page 297
SITE PLAN VS ROW EXHIBIT
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DRIVEWAY




Page 298




APN: 171-16-009
4640 E CAMELBACK HEIGHTS WAY PHOENIX AZ 85018



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-EST-2-
22-7 - Southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road (Resolution 22072)

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following
item to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related
resolution if approved. This is a companion case to Z-42-22-7 and must be heard
first, followed by Z-42-22-7.

Summary
Application: GPA-EST-2-22-7
Current Designation: Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (0.93 acres) and
Commerce/Business Park (12.58 acres)
Proposed Designation: Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 13.51
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Owner: Kelly Mahoney, Hillpointe, LLC
Applicant: Jonathan Schwerd, RK Design & Professional Services, LLC
Representative: Jonathan Schwerd, RK Design & Professional Services, LLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 16,
2022, and recommended approval, by a vote of 6-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Addresses: 10645 W. Buckeye Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.

Page 299
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-EST-2-22-
7, CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-EST-2-22-7. The 13.51 acres

located at the southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road is designated as

Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as

shown below:




Page 300
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October

2022.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




-2- Resolution

Page 301
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney



By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




PL:tml:LF22-1285:9-7-22:21307




-3- Resolution



Page 302
Attachment B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
August 15, 2022
Application: GPA-EST-2-22-7

Applicant/Representative: Jonathan Schwerd, RK Design & Professional
Services, LLC

Owner: Kelly Mahoney, Hillpointe, LLC

Location: Southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye
Road

Acreage: 13.51 acres

Current Plan Designation: Commerce/Business Park (12.58 acres)
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (0.93
acres)

Requested Plan Designation: Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre

Reason for Requested Change: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map to allow
multifamily residential

Estrella Village Planning
Committee Meeting Date: August 16, 2022

Staff Recommendation: Approval

FINDINGS:

1) The subject site is appropriate for residential uses at the proposed densities and
provides new housing opportunities in this part of the city. Furthermore, the
development has adequate street access and provides various opportunities for
recreation to future residents.

2) As stipulated, the companion rezoning case Z-42-22-7 requires the site to
incorporate enhanced standards for open space, bicycle parking and landscaping
to be compatible with the adjacent residential uses.




Page 303
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-2-22-7


3) The proposed land use designation is appropriate for the site as it proposes
access to an arterial street, Buckeye Road.

BACKGROUND

The subject site is 13.51 gross acres and is located on the southeast corner of 107th
Avenue and Buckeye Road. The subject site currently contains a single-family
residence and agricultural uses. The companion rezoning case Z-42-22-7 is requesting
to rezone the site from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), RE-43 (One-Family
Residence), and C-3 (General Commercial) to R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) to
allow multifamily residential. The General Plan Land Use Map on 12.58 acres of the
subject site is designated as Commerce/Business Park and the remaining 0.93 acres is
designated Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed General Plan
Amendment is to designate the site as Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.

SURROUNDING LAND USES

NORTH
North of the subject site, across Buckeye Road, are numerous warehouse and
distribution centers within the City of Tolleson. The City of Tolleson General Plan Land
Use Map designation is El Districto (Business District).

SOUTH
South of the subject site is a single-family residential subdivision zoned R1-8 (Single-
Family Residence District). This area is designated as Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre.

EAST
East of the subject site is the Academy of Math & Science zoned S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence). This is designated as Commerce/Business Park.

WEST
West of the subject site, across 107th Avenue, is vacant land and a single-family
residential subdivision in the City of Avondale. The City of Avondale General Plan Land
Use Map designates the site as Medium Density Residential.




Page 304
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-2-22-7




Existing and Proposed General Land Use Designation Maps
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department

RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES

• CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES;
LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity,
respectful of local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The proposal provides a reasonable level of intensity that is respectful to local
conditions. The companion rezoning case, Z-42-22-7, includes stipulations for
enhanced landscaping, to ensure future development will be compatible with the
area’s character and buffered from the single-family residential subdivision to the
south.

• CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a
mix of housing types and densities where appropriate within each village
that support a broad range of lifestyles.

The request facilitates additional residential options along an arterial street and
allows additional housing opportunities in the Village that will help alleviate the



Page 305
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-2-22-7


housing crisis.

• BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND
SHADE; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of
new development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The proposal, as stipulated in the companion rezoning case Z-42-22-7, will
provide enhanced shade and landscape setback standards. The shade trees will
help provide a thermally comfortable environment for site users.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-EST-2-22-7. The proposed land use map
designation allows for future multifamily residential development of this site,
appropriately located along an arterial street (Buckeye Road). The companion rezoning
case, Z-42-22-7, as stipulated, will require enhanced standards for open space, bicycle
parking, and pedestrian connections.

Writer
Nayeli Sanchez Luna
August 15, 2022

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)




Page 306
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-EST-2-22-7 ACRES: 13.51 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Estrella COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7
APPLICANT: Jonathan Schwerd
EXISTING:
Commerce / Business Park ( 12.58 +/- Acres)
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ acre ( 0.93 +/- Acres)



Proposed Change Area
BUCKEYE RD
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Commerce/Business Park




107TH AVE


PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 15+ du/ acre ( 13.51 +/- Acres)



Proposed Change Area
BUCKEYE RD
Residential 15+ du/ac




107TH AVE

Page 307
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-EST-2-22-7_BW ACRES: 13.51 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Estrella COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7
APPLICANT: Jonathan Schwerd
EXISTING:
Commerce / Business Park ( 12.58 +/- Acres)
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ acre ( 0.93 +/- Acres)



Proposed Change Area
BUCKEYE RD
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Commerce/Business Park




107TH AVE


PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 15+ du/ acre ( 13.51 +/- Acres)


Proposed Change Area
Residential 15+ du/acre
BUCKEYE RD




107TH AVE

Page 308
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-EST-2-22-7

Date of VPC Meeting August 16, 2022
Request From: Commerce/Business Park (12.58 acres)
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (0.93 acres)
Request To: Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Proposed Use: Amend the General Plan Land Use Map to allow
multifamily residential
Location Southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye
Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 6-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

Cases EST-2-22-7 and Z-42-22-7 are companion cases and were heard together.

One member of the public registered to speak on this item, in opposition.

Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an overview of the general plan amendment
and rezoning requests. Ms. Sanchez Luna discussed the location of the site, the
requested zoning designation, the surrounding land uses, and the proposed General
Plan Land Use Map designation. Ms. Sanchez Luna displayed the site plan and
elevations and described the proposed number of units, access into the development,
number of amenities, and the variations in color and texture. Ms. Sanchez Luna
concluded the presentation by providing the staff findings, the recommendation, and
describing the proposed stipulations

Jonathan Schwerd, representing the applicant with RK Design & Professional
Services, LLC, provided an overview of the proposed general plan amendment,
rezoning request, and surrounding land uses. Mr. Schwerd displayed the site plan and
described the number of units, the height, enhanced landscaping, and detached
sidewalks. Mr. Schwerd added that the proposed development would have access to
Buckeye Road and 107th Avenue. Mr. Schwerd noted that they have worked with the
adjacent school district to address south access into 107th Avenue. Mr. Schwerd
concluded his presentation by stating that a building setback of 120 feet would help act
as a buffer to the single-family residential subdivision to the south.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 309
Questions from the committee:

Committee member Beth Cartwright stated that she lived in the vicinity of the
proposed development and that this area would benefit from a multifamily development.

Vice Chair Parris Wallace asked if this proposal was going to be accessible to all
income ranges and asked what the income was in this area. Ms. Cartwright stated that
the surrounding houses were all new subdivisions with average incomes.

Committee member Lisa Perez asked if the proposed development would be gated
and thanked the applicant for working on the south access. Ms. Perez then asked if
there were any concerns with the bar across the school. Mr. Schwerd stated that they
do not anticipate any issues with the established bar. Ms. Perez asked how the
development would handle access to the school from the south. Mr. Schwerd stated
that the school has access to the south easement but that the applicant was the owner.
Ms. Perez asked if the proposed development would have any bicycle parking, electric
vehicle charging stations and amenities. Vice Chair Wallace stated that there had to
be a minimum of eight amenities and asked for confirmation if it was a stipulation. Ms.
Sanchez Luna confirmed that the development was stipulated to have a minimum of
eight amenities. Ms. Perez asked if the applicant could explain the relationship
between the open space and the proposed amenities. Mr. Schwerd stated that the
development would have ramadas, barbeque areas, other amenities, and bicycle
parking located throughout the entire development.

Committee member Dan Rush asked if the development would have electric vehicle
charging stations. Mr. Schwerd stated that they were willing to install electric vehicle
charging stations. Ms. Perez noted that the City of Phoenix has passed an electric
transportation plan and wanted the applicant to address electric vehicle charging
stations. Mr. Schwerd stated that they were willing to install electric vehicle charging
stations. Mr. Rush asked how many charging stations would be installed. Ms.
Cartwright stated that one percent of 288 units would be three parking stations. Mr.
Rush stated that two charging stations would be sufficient.

Ms. Perez stated that she didn’t have the opportunity to discuss the project with the
superintendent and that there weren’t any comments from the City of Avondale or the
City of Tolleson. Ms. Perez added that the Committee was not given enough time to
review the staff reports and make a reasonable decision. Mr. Rush stated that the
proposed development and density is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Vice
Chair Wallace stated that this project could also be continued. Mr. Rush asked if there
was a list of questions that need to be answered and that he did not agree with
continuing the cases. Mr. Rush noted that that the developer did reach out to the
community. Ms. Perez stated she wanted to know the number of bicycle parking
spaces, the amenities, street improvements, and other items. Mr. Schwerd stated that
they had reached out to the two adjacent cities, but they did not provide comments. Mr.
Schwerd added that they were willing to add as many charging stations as the Village
Planning Committee requested. Ms. Perez asked where the gates would be located
along the south accessway. Mr. Schwerd explained that the south accessway would
have two gated exits along the south accessway. Ms. Perez asked for clarification if the
south accessway would be exit right-turn-only and if ingress would be located on
Buckeye Road. Mr. Schwerd confirmed that the south accessway would be exit-only
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 310
and that ingress would occur on Buckeye Road. Ms. Perez stated she would prefer to
have more time to analyze the proposed development to ensure that it doesn’t have any
adverse effects on the Estrella Village.

Public Comment:

Ms. Tracy Hornketh stated that her property is located on the south side of the
proposed development and noted that she agreed with Committee member Perez’s
concerns. Ms. Hornketh stated that there is a lot of traffic congestion located along
107th Avenue and Buckeye Road and that she was opposed to the proposed height.
Ms. Hornketh noted that 107th avenue also has a lot of safety issues regarding speed
and road damage. Ms. Hornketh concluded her public comment by requesting that the
Committee recommend denial to the proposed development.

Applicant Response:

Mr. Schwerd thanked Tracy Hornketh for her comment and stated that they would work
towards further addressing the concerns that the community has presented.

Committee Discussion:

Committee member Dafra Joel Sanou stated that he lived in the area and if the
applicant could address traffic congestion it would help the proposed development. Mr.
Schwerd stated in the year 2026 the Maricopa Department of Transportation (MCDOT)
would start to widen Buckeye Road and 107th Avenue.

Motion:
Beth Cartwright motioned to recommend approval of GPA-EST-2-22-7 per the staff
recommendation. Dan Rush seconded the motion.

Vote:
6-1, Motion to recommend approval passed, with Committee Members Barquin,
Cartwright, Burd, Rush, Sanou, and Wallace, in favor and Perez in opposition.

Staff comments regarding VPC Recommendation:
None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 311
ATTACHMENT D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
September 1, 2022

ITEM NO: 8
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-EST-2-22-7 (Companion Case Z-42-22-7)
Location: Southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road
From: Commerce / Business Park and Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
To: Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 13.51
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to allow multifamily residential
Applicant: Jonathan Schwerd, RK Design & Professional Services, LLC
Owner: Kelly Mahoney, Hillpointe, LLC
Representative: Jonathan Schwerd, RK Design & Professional Services, LLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Estrella 8/16/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 6-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee
recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Perez made a MOTION to approve GPA-EST-2-22-7, per the
Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Perez
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Busching and Simon
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The subject site is appropriate for residential uses at the proposed densities and
provides new housing opportunities in this part of the city. Furthermore, the
development has adequate street access and provides various opportunities for
recreation to future residents.

2. As stipulated, the companion rezoning case Z-42-22-7 requires the site to incorporate
enhanced standards for open space, bicycle parking and landscaping to be compatible
with the adjacent residential uses.




Page 312
3. The proposed land use designation is appropriate for the site as it proposes access to
an arterial street, Buckeye Road.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, leslie.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 313



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-42-22-7 -
Southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road (Ordinance G-7040)

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance,
Section 601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning
Application Z-42-22-7 and rezone the site from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence
District), RE-43 (One-Family Residence District), and C-3 (General Commercial
District) to R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) to allow multifamily residential. This
is a companion case to GPA-EST-2-22-7 and must be heard following GPA-EST-2-
22-7.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 (9.70 acres), RE-43 (0.46 acres), and C-3 (3.35 acres)
Proposed Zoning: R-3A
Acreage: 13.51
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Owner: Kelly Mahoney, Hillpointe, LLC
Applicant: Jonathan Schwerd, RK Design & Professional Services, LLC
Representative: Jonathan Schwerd, RK Design & Professional Services, LLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 16,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 6-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 10645 W. Buckeye Road




Page 314

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.




Page 315
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-42-22-7) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT), RE-43 (ONE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT), AND C-3 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) TO
R-3A (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 13.51-acre property located at the southeast

corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road in a portion of Section 17, Township 1

North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed

from 9.70 acres of “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence District), 0.46-acres of “RE-43”

(One-Family Residence District), and 3.35 acres of “C-3” (General Commercial District),

to “R-3A” (Multifamily Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




Page 316
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 288 dwelling units.

2. The maximum building height shall not exceed 3 stories and 40 feet.

3. A minimum building setback of 100 feet for structures exceeding 2 stories and
30 feet shall be provided along the southern portion of the site.

4. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped July 22, 2022 with specific regard to the following, and as approved
by or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to public streets shall contain
a minimum of 25% brick, masonry, stone, or another exterior accent
material that exhibits quality and durability.

b. All ground floor units adjacent to 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road shall
have individual porches or patios oriented to the street.

5. All required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 25% 2-inch
caliper and minimum 75% 3-inch caliper large canopy, drought tolerant trees,
planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

6. Evergreen trees shall be planted along the southern portion of the site, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape pallet and landscaping standards along
arterial streets in the Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8 A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

9. A landscaped gateway entry feature shall be provided on the southeast corner
of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road, as described below and as approved by
the Planning and Development Department:




Page 317
a. An average 75-foot by 75-foot landscape entryway that adheres to the
landscape palette for gateway entry features in the Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program.

b. A minimum 300-square foot landscaped accent area shall be provided.
The landscaped accent area shall provide a visually unique character
with drought-tolerant plant materials providing seasonal interest and
75% live cover.

c. The gateway entry feature shall utilize accents, colors and materials
consistent with the theme of the commercial uses on the same site, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

10. A pedestrian walkway shall be provided from the development to/near the
southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

11. Perimeter fencing or walls within 50 feet of a public street shall be a minimum
of 50% open view fencing, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

12. A minimum of 10% of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,
excluding landscape setbacks, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13 An open space area of a minimum of 25,175 square feet in size shall be
centrally located within the development.

14. A minimum of eight amenities shall be provided, which may include but is not
limited to barbeques, ramadas, and pools, and the amenities shall be
distributed throughout the site, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

15. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. All uncovered surface parking lot area shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper size large canopy drought tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall
be dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25% shade at maturity,
as approved by Planning and Development Department.

17. A minimum of 40 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks dispersed throughout the site or in a secured room and




Page 318
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

18. The sidewalk along 107th Avenue shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb
following the most recent Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and
planted to the following standards, as approved or modified by the MCDOT and
Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade
trees planted to provide a minimum of 75% shade, at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 50 percent live coverage at
maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

19. The sidewalk along Buckeye Road shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb
following the most recent Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and
planted to the following standards, as approved or modified by the MCDOT and
Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade
trees planted to provide a minimum of 75% shade, at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 50 percent live coverage at
maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

20. The developer shall underground existing electrical utilities within the public
right-of-way as part of this project. The developer shall coordinate with the
affected utilities company for their review and permitting, as approved or
modified by the MCDOT and Planning and Development Department.

21. Existing irrigation facilities along Buckeye Road are to be undergrounded and
relocated outside of MCDOT and/or City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP
to identify existing land rights and establish the appropriate process to relocate
the facility. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer
require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval, as
approved or modified by the MCDOT and Planning and Development




Page 319
Department.

22. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis for this development to
the City of Phoenix and MCDOT. The developer shall be responsible for all
cost of mitigation as required by the approved TIS. No preliminary approval of
plans may be granted until the study has been approved.

23. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the MCDOT and/or Planning and Development Department. All improvements
shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

24. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct a bus bay with an
attached pad along eastbound Buckeye Road. The bus bay shall be compliant
with City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1256. The attached bus pad shall be
compliant with City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1261 with a minimum depth of
10 feet and spaced from the intersection of 107th Avenue according to City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved or modified by the MCDOT and
Planning and Development Department.

25. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Goodyear Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

26. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

27. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

28. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

29. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.




Page 320
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:




Page 321
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 322
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-42-22-7

THAT PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 17,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 17, FROM WHICH
THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES
32 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 2628.77 FEET;

THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, NORTH 89
DEGREES 32 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 763.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O
DEGREES 27 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, 89.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BUCKEYE ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN
INSTRUMENT 2017-0495237, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS, ARIZONA AND THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH O DEGREES 37 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 748.59 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF ESTRELLA.SC.Z RECORDED IN BOOK 576, PAGE
10, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 33
SECONDS WEST, 699.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH O DEGREES 11 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST, 42.51 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 107TH AVENUE AS DESCRIBED IN
INSTRUMENT 2017-0495237, MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDS, ARIZONA;
THENCE ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 3 DEGREES 41
MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 227.05 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 3
DEGREES 41 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST, 112.32 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH O
DEGREES 11 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST, 348.41 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 89 DEGREES 48 Ml
NUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, 23.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT
CURVE,CONCAVE NORTHERLY, FROM WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS
NORTH O DEGREES 02 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 12073.00
FEET;
THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, EASTERLY
271.84 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 24 SECONDS;




Page 323
THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, ON A NON-
TANGENT LINE NORTH 1 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST, 10.00 FEET
TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY,
FROM WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 1 DEGREES 15 MINUTES O7
SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 12063.00 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, EASTERLY
270.58 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1 DEGREES 17 Ml NUTES 07 SECONDS;
THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, NORTH 87
DEGREES 27 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST, 105.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.




Page 324
Page 325
Attachment B




Staff Report Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

Estrella Village Planning Committee August 16, 2022
Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 1, 2022
Request From: S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) (9.70
acres), RE-43 (One-Family Residence)
(0.46), and C-3 (General Commercial)
(3.35 acres)
Request To: R-3A (Multifamily Residence District)
(13.51 acres)
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential
Location: Southeast corner of 107th Avenue and
Buckeye Road

Owner: Kelly Mahoney, Hillpointe, LLC
Applicant/Representative: Jonathan Schwerd, RK Design &
Professional Services, LLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


General Plan Conformity
Commerce/Business Park and
Residential 3.5 and 5 dwelling units per
General Plan Land Use Map Designation acre
Pending Residential 15+ dwelling units
per acre (GPA-EST-2-22-7)
Outside of City limits,
Buckeye Road Arterial within Tolleson
Street Map jurisdiction
Classification Outside of City limits,
Outside of City
107th Avenue within Avondale
limits
jurisdiction




Page 326
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of
housing types and densities where appropriate within each village that support
a broad range of lifestyles.

The subject site is currently vacant and the requested R-3A zoning district will
support a new housing type on a site that is appropriately located along an arterial
and adjacent to an educational institution.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUES; OPPORTUNITY SITES;
LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity,
respectful of local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The proposal, as stipulated, will allow development of a new residential community
that is respectful of local conditions by providing enhanced landscaping standards
and open space.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

As stipulated, the proposal will provide detached sidewalks with 75 percent shade at
maturity and enhanced landscaping for any required setbacks. This will help to
provide shade for pedestrians and mitigate the urban heat island effect by covering
hard surfaces, thus cooling the micro-climate around the vicinity.


Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Estrella Village Plan: Background Item No. 7.

Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program: Background Item No. 8.

Monarch Butterfly Pledge: Background Item No. 9.

Tree and Shade Master Plan: Background Item No. 10.

Complete Streets Guidelines: Background Item No. 11.

Zero Waste PHX: Background Item No. 12.

Housing Phoenix: Background Item No. 13.




Page 327
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use Zoning
Single-family residence with
On Site S-1, RE-43, and C-3
agricultural uses
North (across Buckeye Warehouses and distribution
City of Tolleson, I-2
Road) centers
South Single-family residential R1-8

East School S-1, C-3

West (across 107th Vacant and single-family City of Avondale,
Avenue) residential PAD

R-3A (Multifamily Residence District)
(Planned Residential Development)
Standards Requirements Proposed Site Plan
Gross Acreage - 13.51
Maximum Density (dwelling 23.1, 26.4 with 21.32 dwelling units per acre
units per acre) bonus (met)
Maximum Units 312, 356 with bonus 288 (met)
Maximum Lot Coverage 45 percent 20 percent (met)
Maximum Building Height 3 stories or 40 feet 3 stories and 40 feet (met)
for first 150 feet;
then 1 foot in 5-foot
increase to 48 feet
high or 4 stories.
Minimum Building Setbacks
Adjacent to Streets: 20-feet 20 feet (met)
(North – Buckeye Road)
Adjacent to Streets: 20-feet 20 feet (met)
(West – 107th Avenue)
Not Adjacent to Streets: 15-feet 20 feet (met)
(South – Adjacent to R1-8)
Not Adjacent to Streets: 15-feet 20 feet (met)
(East – Adjacent to S-1 and
C-3)
Minimum Landscape and Open Space Standards
Adjacent to Streets: 20-feet 15 feet (met)
(North – Buckeye Road)




Page 328
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

Adjacent to Streets: 20-feet 15 feet (met)
(West – 107th Avenue)
Not Adjacent to Streets: 5-feet 15 feet (met)
(South – Adjacent to R1-8)
Not Adjacent to Streets: 5-feet 15 feet (met)
(East – Adjacent to S-1 and
C-3)
Minimum Open Space 5 percent 24 percent (met)

Minimum Amenities Provided 2 8 (met)
Minimum Parking 424 required 441 spaces (met)
Resident: 2 spaces per
dwelling unit;
Guest: When resident
parking is reserved, 1
space required per 3
bedroom unit.

Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 13.51 acres located on the southeast corner of 107th
Avenue and Buckeye Road from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), RE-43 (One-
Family Residence), and C-3 (General Commercial) to R-3A (Multifamily
Residence District) to allow a multifamily residential development. The subject
site is currently used as a single-family residence with agricultural uses.

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
2. The requested R-3A (Multifamily
Residence District) will support a
new housing type that is
compatible with the surrounding
area since it is located along an
arterial street and adjacent to an
educational institution. The area to
the east is zoned S-1 (Ranch or
Farm Residence) and C-3
(General Commercial) and
developed with a school. The area
to the south is zoned R1-8 (Single-
Family Residence District) and
developed with a single-family Existing Zoning Aerial Map
subdivision. Source: Planning and Development Depatment
The City of Tolleson is located to
the north of the subject site, across




Page 329
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

Buckeye Road with numerous
warehouses and distribution
centers zoned I-2 (General
Industrial). The City of Avondale is
located to the east side of the
subject site, across 107th Avenue.
There is a vacant lot at the
immediate corner and a single-
family residential development
zoned PAD (Planned Area
Development) south and west of
the vacant lot.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
3. The General Plan Land Use Map designation for this subject site is Residential
3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Commerce/Business Park. A concurrent
minor General Plan Land Use Map amendment case, GPA-EST-2-22-7, is
proposed to change the land use map designation to Residential 15+ dwelling
units per acre. The requested R-3A zoning is consistent with the proposed
General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 15+ dwelling units per
acre. Properties surrounding the site are designated as Residential 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre to the south, and Commerce/Business Park to the east.
To the west, within the City of Avondale, the designation is Medium Density
Residential. To the north, in the City of Tolleson, the designation is El Districto
(Business District).




General Plan Land Use Map
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department




Page 330
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

PROPOSAL
4. Site Plan
The proposal is for 288 multifamily residences. The conceptual site plan,
attached as an exhibit, depicts various residential buildings and amenity areas
distributed throughout the site. The proposed multifamily residential development
depicts access to the subject site off Buckeye Road on the northeast portion of
the site and 107th Avenue on the southwest portion of the site.




Conceptual Site Plan
Source: RK Design & Professional Services, LLC

Staff recommends Stipulation No. 1 which would limit the maximum number of
dwelling units to 288 and Stipulation No. 3 which would require a minimum
building setback of 100 feet for structures exceeding 2 stories and 30 feet. This
will ensure that the proposed multifamily residential development is compatible
with the surrounding land uses including the Academy of Math & Science to the
east and the single-family residential development to the south.

5. Elevations
The conceptual building elevations depict architectural features that include
variations in textures and building heights. In addition, staff is requiring that 25
percent of elevations oriented to a public street shall contain brick, masonry,
stone or another exterior accent material and all units adjacent to 107th Avenue
and Buckeye Road shall have individual porches or patios oriented to the
nearest public street. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4.
To ensure the height is compatible in the area, staff is recommending Stipulation
No. 2 for a maximum building height of 3 stories and 40 feet.




Page 331
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022




Conceptual Building Elevations
Source: RK Design & Professional Services, LLC

6. Open Space
A centralized open space is depicted in the conceptual site plan along with other
open space areas. Staff recommends Stipulation Nos. 12, 13, and 14 to ensure
a wide range of open space within the proposed multifamily development and a
centralized open space with numerous amenities. An increase in the minimum
required open space percentage and number of amenities is appropriate given
the proposed number of dwelling units on the site.

STUDIES AND POLICIES

7. Estrella Village Plan
The Estrella Village Plan adopted in 1999, outlines a vision for developing the
Estrella Village through five main goals that include:
1. Orderly growth;
2. Identifiable village core;
3. Strong residential neighborhoods;
4. Variety of homes and jobs; and
5. Consistent streetscapes and trail linkages.




Page 332
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022




Estrella Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

Goal 3 of the Estrella Village Plan, “Protection of residential neighborhoods”,
Objective A, “New Residential Development”, recommends that new residential
developments and retail centers be supported by street circulation systems and
surrounding character. Bounded by a major arterial street, the proposed R-3A
zoning district allows multifamily residential uses that are supported by the
existing street which will be improved to meet MCDOT standards.

Goal 4, “Housing and Employment”, Objective B, “Variety of housing densities
and types”, recommends a diversity of housing products in the Estrella Village.
The proposed R-3A zoning allows for a multifamily residential use on the site.
This zoning district will introduce a new land use in the immediate area, allowing
for new housing opportunities within the surrounding land area.

Goal 5, “Urban Design”, recommends for streetscape and trail systems to be
uniform and consistent to provide identity and linkage between neighborhoods
and with activity centers. Several stipulations as recommended by staff and
would promote enhanced urban design along the streetscapes. Stipulation Nos.
5, 7, 9, 18, and 19 recommend enhanced landscaping along 107th Avenue and
Buckeye Road to promote a positive character of the village. Lastly, Stipulation
No. 11 requires perimeter fencing or walls within 50 feet of a public street to be
open at a 50 percent minimum. This will increase the visibility from the subject
site to promote safety.



Page 333
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022


8. Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program
The Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program adopted in 1999,
provides a landscape palette for arterial streets within the Estrella Village to help
establish the community’s character. In addition to providing planning guidelines,
the plan also indicates the locations to establish entry gateways that welcome
individuals entering the village with an entry sign and an enhanced landscape
area of 75 feet by 75 feet in size.

The subject site is adjacent to Buckeye Road, an arterial street, and thus staff
recommends Stipulation No. 7 to require adherence with the Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program requirements along the street frontage to
promote the community’s character. Furthermore, the southeast corner of 107th
Avenue and Buckeye Road is a designated Village gateway. Thus, staff
recommends Stipulation No. 9 to require a landscaped gateway entry feature at
this intersection.

9. Monarch Butterfly
In April 2021, Mayor Kate Gallego signed the National Wildlife Federation's
Mayor's Monarch Pledge. This pledge commits the city to take action to support
the monarch butterfly population. In the United States, loss of milkweed habitat is
a major factor in the decline of the monarchs. Arizona has at least 29 species of
milkweed native to the state. Adult monarchs feed on the nectar of many flowers,
but they breed only where milkweeds are found. To support the monarch
butterfly population, Stipulation No. 8 addresses the planting of milkweed shrubs,
or other native nectar plant species, on the subject site.

10. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached
from the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to
provide thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island
effect. Staff is recommending stipulations designed to provide trees and enhance
shade within the development.

Staff is recommending the following stipulations for parking lot and sidewalk
shading:

• All landscape setbacks shall contain 25 percent two-inch caliper trees,
and 75 percent three-inch caliper trees (Stipulation No. 5)

• Evergreen trees shall be planted within the landscape setback along the
south perimeter of the site (Stipulation No. 6);




Page 334
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

• Uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum
two-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees to achieve a minimum of 25
percent shade (Stipulation No. 16);

• Detached sidewalks along all streets with minimum two-inch caliper single
trunk shade trees (Stipulation Nos. 18 and 19).

11. Complete Streets Guidelines
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To provide a safe pedestrian
environment staff is recommending enhanced pavement treatment for the on-site
pedestrian walkways that cross vehicular drive aisles and to provide pedestrian
walkways to the street intersection. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 10 and
15. This development will help pedestrianize the immediate street frontage by
providing a detached sidewalk along 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road.
Furthermore, bicycle parking will be required on the site encourage alternative
transportation. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 17. In addition, any street
improvements be done to City of Phoenix and ADA standards. These are
addressed in Stipulations No. 23.

12. Zero Waste PHX:
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal
to become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance expand its recycling and other
waste diversion programs. The provision of recycling containers was not
addressed in the applicant’s submittals.

13. Housing Phoenix Plan
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan.
This Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of
housing with vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through
increased housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes.
Phoenix’s rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a
need for over 163,000 new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply
relative to demand are a primary reason why housing costs
are increasing.

The proposed development supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating
50,000 housing units by 2030 by contributing to a variety housing types that will
address the supply shortage at a more rapid pace while using vacant land in a
more sustainable fashion.




Page 335
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY

14. As of the writing of this report, staff did not receive any letters in opposition from
the public on this rezoning case.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS

15. The Fire Department indicated there are no problems anticipated with the case
and that the site and/or buildings shall comply with the International Fire Code
with Phoenix Amendments. Further, the Department commented that they do not
know the water supply at this site and noted that fire flow requirements may
present a challenge for this site.

16. The Street Transportation Department has indicated that the developer will be
required to underground existing electrical utilities within the public right-of-way
and underground existing irrigation facilities along Buckeye Road in addition to
require all street improvements be made to City, MCDOT, and ADA standards.
Furthermore, the Street Transportation Department is requiring that the
developer submit a Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed development. These
requirements are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 20 through 23.

17. The Public Transit Department has indicated that the developer shall dedicate
right-of-way and construct a bus bay with an attached bus pad along Buckeye
Road. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 24.

18. The City of Phoenix Aviation Department has indicated that due to the proximity
of the Goodyear Airport and potential for noise from airport related activity,
an additional stipulation has been added that would require documents to
disclose the existence and operational characteristics of the Phoenix Goodyear
Airport to future owners or tenants of the property. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 25.

OTHER

19. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically
sensitive. If further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office
determines the site and immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if
no previous archaeological projects have been conducted within this project
area, it is recommended that archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be
conducted. Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations may be
necessary based upon the results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must
make this determination in consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist.
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery
and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and




Page 336
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

allowed time to properly assess the materials. These are addressed in
Stipulation Nos. 26 through 28.

20. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution
in Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required
by the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to
require the form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan
approval. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 29.

21. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements such
as obtaining a use permit to conduct the proposed outdoor use in this zoning
district. Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.

Findings

1. The proposed zoning is consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment
designation of Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.

2. The proposal will develop a vacant property and as stipulated, will be compatible
with surrounding land uses.

3. The development, as stipulated, will incorporate design and landscaping features
that enhance the location, consistent with the Estrella Village Plan.


Stipulations

1. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 288 dwelling units.

2. The maximum building height shall not exceed 3 stories and 40 feet.

3. A minimum building setback of 100 feet for structures exceeding 2 stories and
30 feet shall be provided along the southern portion of the site.

4. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date
stamped July 22, 2022 with specific regard to the following, and as approved by
or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to public streets shall contain
a minimum of 25% brick, masonry, stone, or another exterior accent
material that exhibits quality and durability.

b. All ground floor units adjacent to 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road




Page 337
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

shall have individual porches or patios oriented to the street.

5. All required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 25% 2-inch
caliper and minimum 75% 3-inch caliper large canopy, drought tolerant trees,
planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

6. Evergreen trees shall be planted along the southern portion of the site, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

7. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape pallet and landscaping standards along arterial
streets in the Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

8 A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

9. A landscaped gateway entry feature shall be provided on the southeast corner of
107th Avenue and Buckeye Road, as described below and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department:

a. An average 75-foot by 75-foot landscape entryway that adheres to the
landscape palette for gateway entry features in the Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program.

b. A minimum 300-square foot landscaped accent area shall be provided.
The landscaped accent area shall provide a visually unique character
with drought-tolerant plant materials providing seasonal interest and
75% live cover.

c. The gateway entry feature shall utilize accents, colors and materials
consistent with the theme of the commercial uses on the same site, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

10. A pedestrian walkway shall be provided from the development to/near the
southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

11. Perimeter fencing or walls within 50 feet of a public street shall be a minimum of
50% open view fencing, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

12. A minimum of 10% of the gross site area shall be retained as open space,




Page 338
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

excluding landscape setbacks, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13 An open space area of a minimum of 25,175 square feet in size shall be
centrally located within the development.

14. A minimum of eight amenities shall be provided, which may include but is not
limited to barbeques, ramadas, and pools, and the amenities shall be distributed
throughout the site, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. All uncovered surface parking lot area shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch
caliper size large canopy drought tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be
dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25% shade at maturity, as
approved by Planning and Development Department.

17. A minimum of 40 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks dispersed throughout the site or in a secured room and
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

18. The sidewalk along 107th Avenue shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb
following the most recent Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and
planted to the following standards, as approved or modified by the MCDOT and
Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant
shade trees planted to provide a minimum of 75% shade, at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 50 percent live coverage at
maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

19. The sidewalk along Buckeye Road shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb
following the most recent Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and
planted to the following standards, as approved or modified by the MCDOT and




Page 339
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant
shade trees planted to provide a minimum of 75% shade, at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 50 percent live coverage at
maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.

20. The developer shall underground existing electrical utilities within the public
right-of-way as part of this project. The developer shall coordinate with the
affected utilities company for their review and permitting, as approved or
modified by the MCDOT and Planning and Development Department.

21. Existing irrigation facilities along Buckeye Road are to be undergrounded and
relocated outside of MCDOT and/or City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP
to identify existing land rights and establish the appropriate process to relocate
the facility. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer
require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval, as
approved or modified by the MCDOT and Planning and Development
Department.

22. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis for this development to the
mitigation as required by the approved TIS. No preliminary approval of plans
may be granted until the study has been approved.

23. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the MCDOT and/or
Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all
ADA accessibility standards.

24. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct a bus bay with an
attached pad along eastbound Buckeye Road. The bus bay shall be compliant
with City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1256. The attached bus pad shall be
compliant with City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1261 with a minimum depth of
10 feet and spaced from the intersection of 107th Avenue according to City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved or modified by the MCDOT and
Planning and Development Department.

25. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and




Page 340
Staff Report: Z-42-22-7
August 15, 2022

operational characteristics of Phoenix Goodyear Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.

26. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

27. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

28. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

29. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

Writer
Nayeli Sanchez Luna
August 15, 2022

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped July 22, 2022 (1 page)
Conceptual Elevations date stamped July 22, 2022 (3 pages)




Page 341
CITY OF
107TH AVE
AVONDALE
Phoenix City Limits
BUCKEYE RD

C-3

CP/GCP*
Z-36-17

S-1



YUMA ST
RE-43



Phoenix City Limits
R1-8 PRD*
PAPAGO ST


106TH LN
Z-21-10
R1-8 *
105TH DR
Z-60-00
PIMA ST 104
T
4 TH S TH
LN
mapservices@phoenix.gov



I
Miles
Z-42-22
VAN BUREN ST
I-10
I-17


BUCKEYE RD
0.06 0.03 0 0.06
ESTRELLA VILLAGE LOWER BUCKEYE RD


CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 BROADWAY RD


43RD AVE 35TH AVE 27TH AVE 19TH AVE
51ST AVE
67TH AVE SR 202 (Proposed)
SOUTHERN AVE


75TH AVE
91ST AVE 83RD AVE
99TH AVE
107TH AVE 59TH AVE




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
RK Design & Professional Services LLC
FROM:
S-1 ( 9.70 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO.
Z-42-22
DATE:
6/3/2022
REVISION DATES:
C-3 ( 3.35 a.c.)
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
RE-43 ( 0.46 a.c.)
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
13.51 Acres QS 8-3 F-2 TO: R-3A ( 13.51 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1, C-3, RE-43 9, 48, N/A N/A, 58, N/A
R-3A 297 356

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-42-22.mxd
Page 342
CITY OF
107TH AVE
AVONDALE
Phoenix City Limits
BUCKEYE RD

C-3

CP/GCP*
Z-36-17

S-1



YUMA ST
RE-43



Phoenix City Limits
R1-8 PRD*
PAPAGO ST


106TH LN
Z-21-10
R1-8 *
105TH DR
Z-60-00
PIMA ST 104
T
4 TH S TH
LN



I
Miles
Z-42-22
VAN BUREN ST
I-10
I-17


BUCKEYE RD
0.06 0.03 0 0.06
ESTRELLA VILLAGE LOWER BUCKEYE RD


CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 BROADWAY RD


43RD AVE 35TH AVE 27TH AVE 19TH AVE
51ST AVE
67TH AVE SR 202 (Proposed)
SOUTHERN AVE


75TH AVE
91ST AVE 83RD AVE
99TH AVE
107TH AVE 59TH AVE




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
RK Design & Professional Services LLC
FROM:
S-1 ( 9.70 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO.
Z-42-22
DATE:
6/3/2022
REVISION DATES:
C-3 ( 3.35 a.c.)
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
RE-43 ( 0.46 a.c.)
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
13.51 Acres QS 8-3 F-2 TO: R-3A ( 13.51 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
S-1, C-3, RE-43 9, 48, N/A N/A, 58, N/A
R-3A 297 356

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-42-22.mxd
Page 343
& PROFESSIONAL



SERVICES, LLC.




DESIGN
33' R/W

SCALE: 1"=50'


0' 50'
BUCKEYE ROAD
110' R/W 15' LANDSCAPE SETBACK VICINITY MAP
15' LANDSCAPE SETBACK




22'
32'
GYM
20' BUILDING OWNER ENGINEER
SETBACK OFFICE +,//32,17(//& 5.'(6,*1 352)(66,21$/6(59,&(6//&
BLD 1 POOL 0$&21+,*+:$< 1&27721/$1(
%8,/',1* 68,7(
$7+(16*$ :$''(//$=
&217$&7.(//<0$+21(< &217$&752%(57.1,*+7(1
 
.0$+21(<#+,//32,17(&20 5.1,*+7(1#5.'(6,*1$=86




26' PROJECT DESCRIPTION
81,708/7,)$0,/<'(9(/230(17:,7+3$5./$1'6&$3(
&20081,7,(6&/8%+286(/($6,1*2)),&(*<0$1'322/
107TH AVENUE


SITE INFORMATION
BLD 4
BLD 93' $''5(66 :%8&.(<(52$'
65' 93' BLD 2 3+2(1,;$=
R/W R/W 26'
*52666,7($&5($*( $&5(6
1(76,7($&5($*( $&5(6

(;,67,1*=21,1* &5(6
352326('=21,1* 5$ 35'

RAMADA & RAMADA & .12:1&$6( .,9$ 
6'(9 
Page 344
27' BARBEQUE BARBEQUE BLD 9 3$33 
26'
'(16,7<$//2:(' 81,76$&5(:,7+%2186
'(16,7<352326(' 81,76$&5(
10649 W BUCKEYE ROAD, PHOENIX, AZ

/27&29(5$*(
$//2:(' 
/27&29(5$*(
3529,'(' 
BLD 7
BLD 3 23(163$&( 
SITE PLAN
26' %8,/',1*
+(,*+70$; 6725,(625 )25),567  ,1 
,1&5($6(72 +(,*+76725<0$;
%8,/',1*
+(,*+73529,'('  
S17,T1N,R1E(SW 14-W10) APN 101-15-006J

26' %8,/',1*6(7%$&.6
BLD 5 BLD 6
%8&.(<(52$'  0,1
7+$9(18(  0,1
BUCKEYE @ 107 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT



6287+3523(57</,1(  0,1
RAMADA & ($673523>(57</,1(  0,1
BARBEQUE
81,7&2817

;81,76 
BLD 70'
OFF-SITE ;81,76 
ON-SITE BLD 10 ;81,76 
727$/81,76  NOT FOR
RETENTION
46' DRAINAGE RETENTION
5(48,5('3$5.,1*
ESMT 63$&(63(581,7 

3$5.,1*3529,'('
$&&(66,%/(3$5.,1* 
15' LANDSCAPE SETBACK 3$5.,1*63$&(6 
26'
CONSTRUCTION
BLD 124' BLD 122' 727$/3529,'('  81,7
20' BUILDING SETBACK
DATE
$0(1,7,(6
%$5%(48(6  SCALE
5$0$' 6 
322/6 
*<0  PROJECT
20' BUILDING SETBACK 727$/ 
FILE
15' LANDSCAPE SETBACK
SHEET


SP1
& PROFESSIONAL



SERVICES, LLC.




DESIGN



39'-8"

34'-0"
30'-9"




A B C A D A C B A D C A B A D C B A



)5217(/(9$7,21
  




CONCEPT EXTERIOR FINISH
$ 60227+678&&2)$6&,$


% 7+,1%5,&.9(1((5


& &20326,7(6,',1*0$7(5,$/
Page 345
39'-8" 39'-8" ' 0(7$/5$,/,1*$1'0(7$/0(6+
34'-0" 34'-0"
30'-9" 30'-9"




BLD TYPE 1
C A A B A C C A A B A C



/()7(/(9$7,21 5,*+7(/(9$7,21
     
10649 W BUCKEYE ROAD, PHOENIX, AZ

BUCKEYE @ 107 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS



39'-8"

34'-0"
30'-9"
DATE

SCALE

PROJECT

FILE
A B C A D A C B A D C A B A D C B A SHEET

5($5(/(9$7,21
  
A100
& PROFESSIONAL



SERVICES, LLC.




DESIGN



39'-8"

34'-0"
30'-9"




A C B A D C A B A D C B A



)5217(/(9$7,21
  




CONCEPT EXTERIOR FINISH
$ 60227+678&&2)$6&,$


% 7+,1%5,&.9(1((5


& &20326,7(6,',1*0$7(5,$/
Page 346
39'-8" 39'-8" ' 0(7$/5$,/,1*$1'0(7$/0(6+
34'-0" 34'-0"
30'-9" 30'-9"




BLD TYPE 2
C A A B A C C A A B A C



/()7(/(9$7,21 5,*+7(/(9$7,21
     
10649 W BUCKEYE ROAD, PHOENIX, AZ

BUCKEYE @ 107 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS



39'-8"

34'-0"
30'-9"
DATE

SCALE

PROJECT

FILE

A C B A D C A B A D C B A SHEET

5($5(/(9$7,21
  
A100
& PROFESSIONAL



SERVICES, LLC.




DESIGN



39'-8"

34'-0"
30'-9"




A B C A D C B A


)5217(/(9$7,21
  




CONCEPT EXTERIOR FINISH
$ 60227+678&&2)$6&,$


% 7+,1%5,&.9(1((5


& &20326,7(6,',1*0$7(5,$/
Page 347
39'-8" 39'-8" ' 0(7$/5$,/,1*$1'0(7$/0(6+
34'-0" 34'-0"
30'-9" 30'-9"




BLD TYPE 3
C A A B A C C A A B A C



/()7(/(9$7,21 5,*+7(/(9$7,21
     
10649 W BUCKEYE ROAD, PHOENIX, AZ

BUCKEYE @ 107 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS



39'-8"

34'-0"
30'-9"
DATE

SCALE

PROJECT

FILE

A B C A D C B A SHEET

5($5(/(9$7,21
  
A100
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-42-22-7

Date of VPC Meeting August 16, 2022
Request From: S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) (9.70 acres),
RE-43 (One-Family Residence) (0.46 acres), and
C-3 (General Commercial) (3.35 acres)
Request To: R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) (13.51 acres)
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential
Location Southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye
Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 6-1

VPC DISCUSSION:

Cases EST-2-22-7 and Z-42-22-7 are companion cases and were heard together.

One member of the public registered to speak on this item, in opposition.

Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an overview of the general plan amendment
and rezoning requests. Ms. Sanchez Luna discussed the location of the site, the
requested zoning designation, the surrounding land uses, and the proposed General
Plan Land Use Map designation. Ms. Sanchez Luna displayed the site plan and
elevations and described the proposed number of units, access into the development,
number of amenities, and the variations in color and texture. Ms. Sanchez Luna
concluded the presentation by providing the staff findings, the recommendation, and
describing the proposed stipulations

Jonathan Schwerd, representing the applicant with RK Design & Professional
Services, LLC, provided an overview of the proposed general plan amendment,
rezoning request, and surrounding land uses. Mr. Schwerd displayed the site plan and
described the number of units, the height, enhanced landscaping, and detached
sidewalks. Mr. Schwerd added that the proposed development would have access to
Buckeye Road and 107th Avenue. Mr. Schwerd noted that they have worked with the
adjacent school district to address south access into 107th Avenue. Mr. Schwerd
concluded his presentation by stating that a building setback of 120 feet would help act
as a buffer to the single-family residential subdivision to the south.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 348
Questions from the committee:

Committee member Beth Cartwright stated that she lived in the vicinity of the
proposed development and that this area would benefit from a multifamily development.

Vice Chair Parris Wallace asked if this proposal was going to be accessible to all
income ranges and asked what the income was in this area. Ms. Cartwright stated that
the surrounding houses were all new subdivisions with average incomes.

Committee member Lisa Perez asked if the proposed development would be gated
and thanked the applicant for working on the south access. Ms. Perez then asked if
there were any concerns with the bar across the school. Mr. Schwerd stated that they
do not anticipate any issues with the established bar. Ms. Perez asked how the
development would handle access to the school from the south. Mr. Schwerd stated
that the school has access to the south easement but that the applicant was the owner.
Ms. Perez asked if the proposed development would have any bicycle parking, electric
vehicle charging stations and amenities. Vice Chair Wallace stated that there had to
be a minimum of eight amenities and asked for confirmation if it was a stipulation. Ms.
Sanchez Luna confirmed that the development was stipulated to have a minimum of
eight amenities. Ms. Perez asked if the applicant could explain the relationship
between the open space and the proposed amenities. Mr. Schwerd stated that the
development would have ramadas, barbeque areas, other amenities, and bicycle
parking located throughout the entire development.

Committee member Dan Rush asked if the development would have electric vehicle
charging stations. Mr. Schwerd stated that they were willing to install electric vehicle
charging stations. Ms. Perez noted that the City of Phoenix has passed an electric
transportation plan and wanted the applicant to address electric vehicle charging
stations. Mr. Schwerd stated that they were willing to install electric vehicle charging
stations. Mr. Rush asked how many charging stations would be installed. Ms.
Cartwright stated that one percent of 288 units would be three parking stations. Mr.
Rush stated that two charging stations would be sufficient.

Ms. Perez stated that she didn’t have the opportunity to discuss the project with the
superintendent and that there weren’t any comments from the City of Avondale or the
City of Tolleson. Ms. Perez added that the Committee was not given enough time to
review the staff reports and make a reasonable decision. Mr. Rush stated that the
proposed development and density is compatible with the surrounding land uses. Vice
Chair Wallace stated that this project could also be continued. Mr. Rush asked if there
was a list of questions that need to be answered and that he did not agree with
continuing the cases. Mr. Rush noted that that the developer did reach out to the
community. Ms. Perez stated she wanted to know the number of bicycle parking
spaces, the amenities, street improvements, and other items. Mr. Schwerd stated that
they had reached out to the two adjacent cities, but they did not provide comments. Mr.
Schwerd added that they were willing to add as many charging stations as the Village
Planning Committee requested. Ms. Perez asked where the gates would be located
along the south accessway. Mr. Schwerd explained that the south accessway would
have two gated exits along the south accessway. Ms. Perez asked for clarification if the
south accessway would be exit right-turn-only and if ingress would be located on
Buckeye Road. Mr. Schwerd confirmed that the south accessway would be exit-only
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 349
and that ingress would occur on Buckeye Road. Ms. Perez stated she would prefer to
have more time to analyze the proposed development to ensure that it doesn’t have any
adverse effects on the Estrella Village.

Public Comment:

Ms. Tracy Hornketh stated that her property is located on the south side of the
proposed development and noted that she agreed with Committee member Perez’s
concerns. Ms. Hornketh stated that there is a lot of traffic congestion located along
107th Avenue and Buckeye Road and that she was opposed to the proposed height.
Ms. Hornketh noted that 107th avenue also has a lot of safety issues regarding speed
and road damage. Ms. Hornketh concluded her public comment by requesting that the
Committee recommend denial to the proposed development.

Applicant Response:

Mr. Schwerd thanked Tracy Hornketh for her comment and stated that they would work
towards further addressing the concerns that the community has presented.

Committee Discussion:

Committee member Dafra Joel Sanou stated that he lived in the area and if the
applicant could address traffic congestion it would help the proposed development. Mr.
Schwerd stated in the year 2026 the Maricopa Department of Transportation (MCDOT)
would start to widen Buckeye Road and 107th Avenue.

Motion:
Beth Cartwright motioned to recommend approval of Z-42-22-7 per the staff
recommendation. Dan Rush seconded the motion.

Vote:
6-1, Motion to recommend approval passed, with Committee Members Barquin,
Cartwright, Burd, Rush, Sanou, and Wallace, in favor and Perez in opposition.

Staff Comments Regarding the VPC Recommendation:
The Village Planning Committee encouraged the applicant to install electric vehicle
charging stations, which the applicant agreed to; however, the committee did not
recommend any additional stipulations in the motion.

Further, committee member Perez requested that the south accessway have a right-
only exit, but a stipulation was not added during the motion.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 350
ATTACHMENT D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
September 1, 2022

ITEM NO: 9
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-42-22-7 (Companion Case GPA-EST-2-22-7)
Location: Southeast corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road
From: S-1, RE-43, and C-3
To: R-3A
Acreage: 13.51
Proposal: Multifamily residential
Applicant: Jonathan Schwerd,RK Design & Professional Services, LLC
Owner: Kelly Mahoney, Hillpointe, LLC
Representative: Jonathan Schwerd, RK Design & Professional Services, LLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Estrella 8/16/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 6-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee
recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Perez made a MOTION to approve Z-42-22-7, per the Estrella
Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Perez
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Busching and Simon
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposed zoning is consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment
designation of Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.

2. The proposal will develop a vacant property and as stipulated, will be compatible with
surrounding land uses.

3. The development, as stipulated, will incorporate design and landscaping features
that enhance the location, consistent with the Estrella Village Plan.




Page 351
Stipulations:

1. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 288 dwelling units.

2. The maximum building height shall not exceed 3 stories and 40 feet.

3. A minimum building setback of 100 feet for structures exceeding 2 stories and 30 feet
shall be provided along the southern portion of the site.

4. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date stamped
July 22, 2022 with specific regard to the following, and as approved by or modified by
the Planning and Development Department.

a. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to public streets shall contain a
minimum of 25% brick, masonry, stone, or another exterior accent material that
exhibits quality and durability.

b. All ground floor units adjacent to 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road shall have
individual porches or patios oriented to the street.

5. All required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 25% 2-inch caliper and
minimum 75% 3-inch caliper large canopy, drought tolerant trees, planted 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

6. Evergreen trees shall be planted along the southern portion of the site, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

7. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program landscape pallet and landscaping standards along arterial streets in the
Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8 A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native nectar
species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

9. A landscaped gateway entry feature shall be provided on the southeast corner of
107th Avenue and Buckeye Road, as described below and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department:

a. An average 75-foot by 75-foot landscape entryway that adheres to the
landscape palette for gateway entry features in the Estrella Village Arterial
Street Landscaping Program.

b. A minimum 300-square foot landscaped accent area shall be provided. The
landscaped accent area shall provide a visually unique character with drought-
tolerant plant materials providing seasonal interest and 75% live cover.




Page 352
c. The gateway entry feature shall utilize accents, colors and materials consistent
with the theme of the commercial uses on the same site, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

10. A pedestrian walkway shall be provided from the development to/near the southeast
corner of 107th Avenue and Buckeye Road, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

11. Perimeter fencing or walls within 50 feet of a public street shall be a minimum of 50%
open view fencing, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

12. A minimum of 10% of the gross site area shall be retained as open space, excluding
landscape setbacks, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

13 An open space area of a minimum of 25,175 square feet in size shall be centrally
located within the development.

14. A minimum of eight amenities shall be provided, which may include but is not limited to
barbeques, ramadas, and pools, and the amenities shall be distributed throughout the
site, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

15. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed
of decorative pavers, stamped, or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrast parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

16. All uncovered surface parking lot area shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch
caliper size large canopy drought tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking area and achieve 25% shade at maturity, as approved by
Planning and Development Department.

17. A minimum of 40 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U and/or
artistic racks dispersed throughout the site or in a secured room and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

18. The sidewalk along 107th Avenue shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and detached
with a landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the
most recent Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and planted to the following
standards, as approved, or modified by the MCDOT and Planning and Development
Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted to provide a minimum of 75% shade, at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 50 percent live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.




Page 353
19. The sidewalk along Buckeye Road shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and detached
with a landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the
most recent Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and planted to the following
standards, as approved, or modified by the MCDOT and Planning and Development
Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees
planted to provide a minimum of 75% shade, at maturity.

b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 50 percent live coverage at maturity.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.

20. The developer shall underground existing electrical utilities within the public right-of-
way as part of this project. The developer shall coordinate with the affected utilities
company for their review and permitting, as approved, or modified by the MCDOT and
Planning and Development Department.

21. Existing irrigation facilities along Buckeye Road are to be undergrounded and
relocated outside of MCDOT and/or City of Phoenix right-of-way. Contact SRP to
identify existing land rights and establish the appropriate process to relocate the
facility. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer require
completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval, as approved or
modified by the MCDOT and Planning and Development Department.

22. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis for this development to the City of
Phoenix and MCDOT. The developer shall be responsible for all cost of mitigation as
required by the approved TIS. No preliminary approval of plans may be granted until
the study has been approved.

23. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping,
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the MCDOT and/or Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility
standards.

24. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct a bus bay with an attached
pad along eastbound Buckeye Road. The bus bay shall be compliant with City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1256. The attached bus pad shall be compliant with City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1261 with a minimum depth of 10 feet and spaced from the
intersection of 107th Avenue according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as
approved or modified by the MCDOT and Planning and Development Department.

25. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Goodyear Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the
templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by the
City Attorney.




Page 354
26. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to clearing
and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

27. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the Phase I
data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified archaeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct
Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

28. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

29. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, leslie.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 355



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-DV-2-
22-1 - Approximately 600 Feet South of the Southwest Corner of 19th Avenue
and Rose Garden Lane (Resolution 22071)

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation to allow
multifamily residential. This is a companion case to Z-34-22-1 and must be heard first,
followed by Z-34-22-1.

Summary
Application: GPA-DV-2-22-1
Current Designation: Industrial
Proposed Designation: Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 22.46 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential

Owner: TCA Plaza I, LLC and TCA Plaza II, LLC
Applicant: Jason Morris/Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris, PLC
Representative: Jason Morris/Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 11,
2022, and recommended approval, by a vote of 10-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 600 feet south of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Rose
Garden Lane.
Council District: 1
Parcel Addresses: 20620 and 20750 N. 19th Ave.




Page 356

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 357
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-DV-2-22-1,
CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-DV-2-22-1. The 22.46 acres

of property located approximately 600 feet south of the southwest corner of 19th

Avenue and Rose Garden Lane is designated as Residential 15+ dwelling units per

acre.

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as

shown below:




Page 358
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October

2022.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




-2- Resolution

Page 359
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney



By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




PL:tml:LF22-3300:2-20-22:2231057v1




-3- Resolution



Page 360
Attachment B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
August 9, 2022
Application: GPA-DV-2-22-1

Owner: TCA Plaza I, LLC and TCA Plaza II, LLC

Applicant/Representative: Jason Morris / Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris, PLC

Location: Approximately 600 feet south of the southwest
corner of 19th Avenue and Rose Garden Lane

Acreage: 22.46 acres

Current Plan Designation: Industrial

Requested Plan Designation: Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre

Reason for Requested Change: A minor General Plan Amendment to allow
multifamily residential

Deer Valley Village Planning
Committee Meeting Date: August 11, 2022

Staff Recommendation: Approval

FINDINGS:

1) The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre would allow higher density attached townhouses,
condominiums, or apartments, which are consistent with land uses in the
surrounding area.

2) The companion rezoning case, Z-34-22-1, proposes a multifamily residential
development, which, as stipulated, protects the character of the surrounding area
by providing additional landscape setback and limiting height adjacent to single-
family residential properties and concentrating density along 19th Avenue, an
arterial street.




Page 361
Staff Analysis
GPA-DV-2-22-1
Page 2


3) The subject site is appropriate for residential uses at the proposed densities and
provides new housing opportunities in this part of the city. Furthermore, the
development has adequate street access and provides streetscape
improvements that benefit the surrounding area.

BACKGROUND

The subject site is 22.46 acres of land, located approximately 600 feet south of the
southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Rose Garden Lane. The subject site contains an
office building, accessory parking, and vacant land. The current General Plan Land Use
Map designation on the site is Industrial and the zoning is Ind. Pk. (Industrial Park). The
proposal is to change the land use designation from Industrial to Residential 15+
dwelling units per acre. The companion Rezoning Case No. Z-34-22-1 is to rezone the
site to R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) to allow multifamily residential.

SURROUNDING LAND USES

The current General Plan Land Use Map designation for the site is Industrial.




Existing General Plan Land Use Map designation, Source: Planning and Development Department

North, south, and east of the subject site is also designated as Industrial, which have
commerce park and commercial land uses. To the west of the subject site, the General
Plan Land Use Map designation is Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre and
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre and the existing land use is single-family
residential.




Page 362
Staff Analysis
GPA-DV-2-22-1
Page 3



RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES

• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels
of increased intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.

The proposed minor General Plan Amendment, along with the companion
rezoning case, Z-34-22-1, would allow redevelopment of an underused site into a
multifamily residential community that is compatible with the surrounding area
and respectful of local conditions. The proposed development is located along a
mixed-use corridor and as stipulated, incorporates setbacks and enhanced
landscaping around the perimeter to enhance compatibility with the surrounding
area.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS

• CERTAINTY & CHARACTER: DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Create new development
or redevelopment that is sensitive to the scale and character of the
surrounding neighborhoods and incorporates adequate development
standards to prevent negative impact(s) on the residential properties.

As stipulated in the companion rezoning case, Z-34-22-1, the proposed
development will be sensitive to the scale and character of the surrounding area.
This section of 19th Avenue contains a mix of higher-intensity commercial uses
and multifamily development. As stipulated, the development would incorporate
standards to avoid negative impacts on the adjacent single-family residences to
the west, including a height limit, increased setbacks, and enhanced
landscaping.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY

• TREES AND SHADE: DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into
the design of new development and redevelopment projects throughout
Phoenix.

As stipulated in the companion rezoning case, Z-34-22-1, the proposal will be
required to shade the sidewalk on 19th Avenue and Monona Drive, provide
enhanced landscaping standards within the perimeter of the development, and
provide additional shading within the surface parking lots. This will help to
provide shade for pedestrians in and around the community and to mitigate the
urban heat island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus cooling the micro-climate
around the vicinity.



Page 363
Staff Analysis
GPA-DV-2-22-1
Page 4



CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-DV-2-22-1. The proposed land use map
designation allows for development that is consistent with the surrounding
developments and provides additional multifamily housing opportunities for the area.
The companion rezoning case, Z-34-22-1, as stipulated, will require design features that
promote compatibility with the surrounding area.

Writer
Anthony Grande
August 9, 2022

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Community Correspondence (3 pages)




Page 364
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DV-2-22-1 ACRES: +/- 22.46 REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Deer Valley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1
APPLICANT: Jason Morris/Benjamin Tate
EXISTING:
Industrial ( 22.46 +/- Acres)




19TH AVE
Proposed Change Area
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac ROSE GARDEN LN

Residential 15+ du/ac
Commercial
Industrial




PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 15+ du/ac ( 22.46 +/- Acres)


ROSE GARDEN LN 19TH AVE




Residential 15+ du/ac (1)
Proposed Change Area (1)




Page 365
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-DV-2-22-1_BW ACRES: +/- 22.46 REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Deer Valley COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1
APPLICANT: Jason Morris/Benjamin Tate
EXISTING:
Industrial ( 22.46 +/- Acres)




19TH AVE
Proposed Change Area
Residential 5 to 10 du/acre ROSE GARDEN LN

Residential 15+ du/acre
Commercial
Industrial




PROPOSED CHANGE:
Residential 15+ du/ac ( 22.46 +/- Acres)


ROSE GARDEN LN 19TH AVE


Residential 15+ du/acre (1)
Proposed Change Area (1)




Page 366
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: FW: Neighborhood Flyer re - Rezoning Application (Z-34-22-1) and Amendment Application (GPA-DV-2-22-1)
Date: Thursday, May 19, 2022 4:07:45 PM



From: Katy Wills
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 3:42 PM
To: Sarah Stockham
Subject: Neighborhood Flyer re - Rezoning Application (Z-34-22-1) and Amendment Application
(GPA-DV-2-22-1)

Hi Sarah,

I reside at 20635 N. 21st Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85027 and received your flyer relating to the Rezoning
Application (Z-34-22-1) and Amendment Application (GPA-DV-2-22-1) of Mack Real Estate Group. I
oppose these rezoning applications, as the land behind my house has been vacant since
1982 when my house was built, and I would prefer for an apartment complex not to block my
backyard view and potentially affect my real estate property value.

Please let me know if you have any questions relating to my opposition of the application.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ann and Katy Wills




Page 367
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: FW: regarding rezoning request
Date: Monday, May 23, 2022 11:50:30 AM



From: Mary Dyas
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 10:58 AM
To: Sarah Stockham
Subject: regarding rezoning request

Sarah

This is in regards to a rezoning request case #Z-34-22 from a Industrial Plan to a Residential Plan. I
definitely oppose this plan. I am a homeowner to three houses in this area. Too many factors play into
this changing of plans in our quiet community such as: property values going down, traffic congestion,
crime going up and the trash it would bring in. So I am requesting you to deny this request of rezoning
this application.



Sincerely yours,

Mary Dyas




Page 368
Village Planner
Sarah Stockham
Phoenix City Government

Application: GPA-DV-2-22-1
Address: 20620 N 19th Avenue

We are owners of the property located at 20817 N 20th Avenue. We have been in the area for 20 years,
running our business. We bought in this area because it was and is zoned for industrial use.

It has come to our attention that the property down the street is requesting a zoning change from
industrial to residential. We have some concerns and objections to that zoning.

1. We have been told that there will be an ingress at the corner of Monona and 20th Avenue. This
will allow for the residence to access this property either by going down Monona or coming
down 20th Avenue. This is also going to allow the fire department or any emergency vehicle to
have access to the property.
2. Current traffic allows for semi’s and delivery trucks to come and go. At times they are stacked in
the street waiting to drop off their deliveries or load. There are times when they unload in the
street. The access of any emergency vehicle would be limited by the congestion in the area.
3. Our employees and other businesses employees have access to street parking. This is utilized
on a daily basis. It is not something we can afford to lose. This also adds to the congestion on
the streets. The elimination of this parking would devalue our property.

Having additional traffic accessing these roads will only contribute to the congestion that we experience
on a daily basis. As for access for emergency vehicles, it would be limited by the current traffic and
street parking. These streets cannot support additional any traffic.

I would like to request that the transportation department do a traffic count and an observation of the
current area before allowing this project to proceed with this ingress at this corner.

County Transportation needs to prove 20th street can handle the additional traffic before approving
the increased density. We do not believe it can and are against the access onto 20th street

Until this is resolved we do not support the rezoning.

Michaelene and Steuart Barlow
20817 N 20th Avenue “B”
Phoenix, Az. 85027
623-580-5200

Cc: Anne O’Brian




Page 369
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DV-2-22-1

Date of VPC Meeting August 11, 2022
Request From Industrial
Request To Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Proposed Use Multifamily residential
Location Approximately 600 feet south of the southwest corner of
19th Avenue and Rose Garden Lane
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 10-1

This item was heard concurrently with Z-34-22-1.

There was one speaker that spoke in opposition.

VPC DISCUSSION

STAFF PRESENTATION
Racelle Escolar, staff, provided an overview of the subject site and surrounding area,
the requested General Plan Amendment, and the staff recommendation for GPA-DV-2-
22-1. Ms. Escolar further described the rezoning request, the proposed site plan and
elevations, and the staff recommendation for Z-34-22-1, including the recommended
stipulations.

Ozzie Virgil asked if the subject site is within the DVAO. Ms. Escolar replied that it is
not within the overlay.

Benjamin Tate, representing the applicant with Withey Morris, PLC, provided a
summary of the subject site and surrounding area, the outreach conducted by the
applicant, and the proposed development, noting that the development will contain
mostly one-story buildings in the western portion. Mr. Tate further described the
proposed amenities throughout the site, the proposed vehicular access, and the traffic
analysis conducted by the applicant.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE
Ricardo Romero asked about the estimated rents. Mr. Tate replied with estimated
rents based on current market data, noting that the market may change by the time the
development is completed.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 370
James Sutphen asked about access for emergency services and the traffic generated
by the project, noting that there is significant traffic in the area already. Mr. Tate replied
that the City did not require a detailed traffic impact analysis because the initial review
determined that the amount of traffic generated by this proposal would be less than
existing conditions. He further stated that the two access points is what would be
required for emergency access based on the reviews that the City has conducted to
date.

Mr. Virgil asked about the distance between the single-family homes and the parking.
Mr. Tate replied that the building code requires an eight-foot separation between
buildings and the development will meet that standard. He further stated that the
development would provide the required parking and would provide adequate guest
parking.

Trilese DiLeo asked if there were members of the public signed up to speak on the
item. Ms. Escolar stated that there was one speaker registered for this item.

James Sutphen stated that there was an opposition letter that stated a concern about
traffic and that he shared a concern about traffic.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jane Koval introduced herself, stating that she lived just south of the proposed
development, and stated a concern about the traffic impact of the proposed
development, noting the existing issues with traffic in the area. She stated a concern
about the environmental impacts of this project combined with another project related to
the airport.

APPLICANT RESPONSE
Mr. Tate stated that there will not be an issue with traffic going north on 21st Avenue
because the driveway to Monona Drive is an ingress only driveway. He further stated
that the project will create additional street parking space due to the elimination of one
curb cut and that the proposal generates a more appropriate amount of traffic compared
with what could be developed by-right on the site.

COMMITTEE DISCUSSION
Ms. DiLeo stated that the traffic generated by the proposal would be less impactful than
the existing conditions due to the scattered entry and exit times expected of a
residential use, compared with an office use.

Chair Grossman agreed with Ms. DiLeo’s comment, adding that an office development
wouldn’t need to come through a zoning process and that there is a need for housing
due to the overall growth of the area.

MOTION
Trilese DiLeo made a motion to recommend approval of GPA-DV-2-22-1. Vice Chair
Kenney seconded the motion for approval.

VOTE
10-1, the motion to recommend approval of GPA-DV-2-22-1 passes; Members
Davenport, DiLeo, Field, Herber, Lewis, Novak, Romero, Virgil, Kenney, and Grossman
in favor; and committee member Sutphen opposed.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 371
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 372
ATTACHMENT D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
September 1, 2022

ITEM NO: 6
DISTRICT NO.: 1
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-DV-2-22-1 (Companion Case Z-34-22-1)
Location: Approximately 600 feet south of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and
Rose Garden Lane
From: Industrial
To: Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 22.46
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to allow multifamily residential
Applicant: Jason Morris/Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris, PLC
Owner: TCA Plaza I, LLC and TCA Plaza II, LLC
Representative: Jason Morris/Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Deer Valley 8/11/2022 Approval. Vote: 10-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Deer Valley Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Vice Chair Mangum made a MOTION to approve GPA-DV-2-22-1, per the Deer
Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Vice Chair Mangum
Second: McCabe
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Busching and Simon
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential 15+ dwelling
units per acre would allow higher density attached townhouses, condominiums, or
apartments, which are consistent with land uses in the surrounding area.

2. The companion rezoning case, Z-34-22-1, proposes a multifamily residential
development, which, as stipulated, protects the character of the surrounding area by
providing additional landscape setback and limiting height adjacent to single-family
residential properties and concentrating density along 19th Avenue, an arterial street.




Page 373
3. The subject site is appropriate for residential uses at the proposed densities and
provides new housing opportunities in this part of the city. Furthermore, the
development has adequate street access and provides streetscape improvements that
benefit the surrounding area.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, leslie.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 374
Attachment E
Rcvd 8/11/2022




Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Attachment F




08/08/2022 CITY Of- PHO r-:t·HX
AUG 1 O 2022
REZONING CASE# Z-34-22-1 Planning & Oeveli)pment
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Department

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN-

I BOUGHT MY HOUSE OVER 20 YEARS AGO BASED ON THE LUXURY OF HAVING NO RESIDENCE
BEHIND ME. I AM IN FEAR OF LOSING MY PRIVACY AND HAVING TO WORRY ABOUT
SECURITY ISSUES. I HAVE BEEN BATTLING CANCER FOR THE LAST 2 YEARS AND AM ALREADY IN
A STRESSFUL SITUATION.
IF IT HAS COME TO WHERE I DON'T HAVE A CHOICE IN THE MATTER, I WOULD LIKE THE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TO APPLY 3 MORE BLOCKS LAYERS TO MY BACK WALL AT THEIR
COST TO ENSURE MY PRIVACY.


THANK YOU FOR HEARING MY CONCERNS.
SINCERELY,
DONNA STATEMA (602) 376-9261
20655 N. 21 5T AVE
PHOENIX AZ 85027




Page 382



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-34-22-1 -
Approximately 600 Feet South of the Southwest Corner of 19th Avenue and Rose
Garden Lane (Ordinance G-7041)

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-34-22-
1 and rezone the site from Ind. Pk. (Industrial Park District) to R-3A (Multifamily
Residence District) to allow multifamily residential. This is a companion case to GPA-
DV-2-22-1 and must be heard following GPA-DV-2-22-1.

Summary
Current Zoning: Ind. Pk.
Proposed Zoning: R-3A
Acreage: 22.46 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential.

Owner: TCA Plaza 1, LLC and TCA Plaza II, LLC
Applicant: Mack Real Estate Group
Representative: Jason Morris/Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris, PLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 11,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a 10-1 vote.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Deer Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a 7-0 vote.

Location
Approximately 600 feet south of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Rose
Garden Lane.
Council District: 1
Parcel Address: 20620 and 20750 N. 19th Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.

Page 383
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-34-22-1) FROM IND. PK. (INDUSTRIAL PARK
DISTRICT) TO R-3A (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 22.46-acre property located approximately

600 feet south of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Rose Garden Lane in a

portion of Section 24, Township 4 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically

in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “Ind. Pk.” (Industrial Park District), to “R-3A”

(Multifamily Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




Page 384
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the conceptual site plan
date stamped July 21, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations and
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size
and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

3. The development shall be limited to 1 story and 20 feet in height within 100 feet
of the west property line.

4. The common open space areas shall provide a minimum of 5 active or passive
recreational elements, located throughout the property, as generally shown on
the site plan date stamped July 21, 2022. Recreational elements meeting this
requirement shall include, but are not limited to, swimming pools, playground
sets, ramadas, dog parks, fire pits, and barbeque areas; and shall not include
lawn or turf areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. The perimeter setbacks on all sides of the site shall be landscaped and shall
include minimum 50 percent 2-inch caliper and minimum 50 percent 3-inch
caliper trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved
by the planning and development department.

6. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as
approved by Planning and Development Department.

7. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the
Zoning Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks shall be
provided for guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the
clubhouse or distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements
of Section 1307.H of the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

9. A 20-foot-wide shared use path easement (SUPE) shall be provided along 19th




Page 385
Avenue and a minimum 10-foot-wide shared use path (SUP) shall be
constructed within the easement in accordance with the MAG supplemental
detail and as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where
conflicts or restrictions exist, the developer shall work with the Site Planning
section on an alternate design through the technical appeal process.

10. The sidewalks along 19th Avenue and Monona Drive shall be shaded by a
structure, landscaping at maturity, or a combination of the two to provide a
minimum of 75 percent shade, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.

11. The developer shall construct a knuckle design at the corner of 20th Avenue
and Monona Drive connecting the roadway and sidewalk, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

12. No vehicular access shall be provided to 21st Avenue along Monona Drive.

13. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

14. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to
the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney.

15. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

16. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the




Page 386
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 12th day of October,

2022.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 387
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-34-22-1

A portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 24, Township 4 North,
Range 2 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, being more
particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING at the Northwest Subdivision corner of the FINAL PLAT FOR
TCA PLAZA, recorded in Book 1064 of Maps, Page 42, records of Maricopa
County, Arizona, said point being monumented with a brass cap flush
with the pavement of 21st Avenue said point also being North 89
degrees 49 minutes 07 seconds West 1330.21 feet from the Northeast
corner of said FINAL PLAT FOR TCA PLAZA, being monumented with a
brass cap flush with the pavement of the centerline intersection of 19th
Avenue and Monona Drive;

Thence along the North line of said FINAL PLAT FOR TCA PLAZA, South
89 degrees 49 minutes 07 seconds East 1330.21 feet to the Northeast
corner of said FINAL PLAT FOR TCA PLAZA;

Thence along the East line of said FINAL PLAT FOR TCA PLAZA, South
00 degrees 04 minutes 16 seconds East 733.61 feet to the Southeast
corner of said FINAL PLAT FOR TCA PLAZA;

Thence along the South line of said FINAL PLAT FOR TCA PLAZA, North
89 degrees 52 minutes 42 seconds West 1328.57 feet to the Southwest
corner of said FINAL PLAT FOR TCA PLAZA;

Thence along the West line of said FINAL PLAT FOR TCA PLAZA, North
00 degrees 11 minutes 54 seconds West 735.00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING,




Page 388
Page 389
Attachment B




Staff Report Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022

Deer Valley Village Planning Committee August 11, 2022
Meeting Date:

Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 1, 2022
Request From: Ind. Pk. (Industrial Park District) (22.46
acres)
Request To: R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) (22.46
acres)
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential
Location: Approximately 600 feet south of the
southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Rose
Garden Lane
Owner: TCA Plaza 1, LLC and TCA Plaza II, LLC
Applicant: Mack Real Estate Group
Representative: Jason Morris/Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris,
PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


General Plan Conformity
Current
Industrial
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
Proposed (GPA-DV-2-22-1)
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre

19th Avenue Major Arterial 65-foot west half street
Street Map Classification Monona Drive Local Street 30-foot south half street
21st Avenue Local Street 33-foot east half street
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
CERTAINTY & CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Create new development or
redevelopment that is sensitive to the scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhoods and incorporates adequate development standards to prevent




Page 390
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




General Plan Conformity
negative impact(s) on the residential properties.

The requested R-3A zoning district will result in development that is sensitive to the scale
and character of the surrounding area. This section of 19th Avenue contains a mix of
higher-intensity commercial and commerce park uses, and multifamily development. As
stipulated, the development would incorporate standards to avoid negative impacts on the
adjacent single-family residences to the west, including a height limit, increased setbacks,
and enhanced landscaping.

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The requested R-3A zoning district would allow redevelopment of an underused site into a
multifamily residential community that is compatible with the surrounding area and
respectful of local conditions. The proposed development is located along a mixed-use
corridor and as stipulated, incorporates setbacks and enhanced landscaping around the
perimeter to enhance compatibility with the surrounding area.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development
and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

As stipulated, the proposal will shade the sidewalk on 19th Avenue and Monona Drive,
provide enhanced landscaping standards within the perimeter of the development, and
provide additional shading within the surface parking lots. This will help to provide shade
for pedestrians in and around the community and to mitigate the urban heat island effect
by covering hard surfaces, thus cooling the micro-climate around the vicinity.



Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 6.

Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 7.

Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 8.

Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 9.




Page 391
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 10.

Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use Zoning

On Site Vacant office building Ind. Pk.

North Commerce park uses CP/GCP
Vacant and self-service
South Ind. Pk. and C-2
storage facility
East (across 19th
Commercial uses Ind. Pk. and C-O
Avenue)
West Single-family residential R1-8 and R-2

R-3A - Multifamily Residence District
(Planned Residential Development Option)

Provisions on the
Standards Requirements
Proposed site Plan
Gross Acreage - 22.46 acres
Total Maximum Number of 519 units, up to 593 with 438 units (Met)
Units bonus
Maximum Density 23.1 dwelling units per 19.50 dwelling units per
acre, up to 26.4 with acre (Met)
bonus
Maximum Lot Coverage 45 percent Not specified
Maximum Building Height 3 stories or 40 feet for 3 stories and 33 feet
150 feet; 1 foot increase (Met)
in height for 5 feet of
additional building
setback, up to 48 feet
and 4 stories




Page 392
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




R-3A - Multifamily Residence District
(Planned Residential Development Option)

Provisions on the
Standards Requirements
Proposed site Plan
Minimum Perimeter Setbacks
Adjacent to public street 20 feet 19th Avenue: 20 feet
(Met)

Monona Drive: 20 feet
(Met)

21st Avenue: 20 feet
(Met)
Adjacent to property line 15 feet North: 20 feet (Met)

West: 30 feet (Met)

South: 15 feet (Met)
Minimum Perimeter Landscape Setbacks
Adjacent to public street 20 feet 19th Avenue: 20 feet
(Met)

Monona Drive: 20 feet
(Met)

21st Avenue: 20 feet
(Met)
Adjacent to property line 5 feet North: 20 feet (Met)

West: 30 feet (Met)

South: 15 feet (Met)
Minimum Open space 5 percent 7.7 percent (Met)
Minimum Parking 680 spaces required 682 spaces (Met)
1.3 spaces per efficiency
unit; 1.5 spaces per 1 or
2 bedroom unit; 2 spaces
per 3 or more bedroom
unit; 1.0 spaces per unit




Page 393
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




of less than 600 square
feet
392 1-, 2-bedroom units
46 3-bedroom units



Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 22.46 acres located approximately 600 feet south of the
southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Rose Garden Lane from Ind. Pk. (Industrial
Park District) to R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) for a multifamily residential
development. The site currently contains an office building, built in 2002, accessory
parking, and vacant land.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
2. The subject site is designated as Industrial on the General Plan Land Use Map. The
properties to the north, east, and south are also designated as Industrial. To the
west, the General Plan Land Use Map designation is Residential 10 to 15 dwelling
units per acre and Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.

The applicant is proposing a minor General Plan Amendment (GPA-DV-2-22-1),
which would change the designation of the subject site from Industrial to Residential
15+ dwelling units per acre. The proposed zoning district is consistent with the
proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation.




Page 394
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




General Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning and Development Department


SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
3. Properties to the north, east and
south all contain commercial zoning,
including CP/GCP, C-2, Ind. Pk., and
C-O with commercial uses. To the
west of the subject site are two
single-family residential
neighborhoods within R1-8 and R-2
districts.




Zoning Aerial Map, Source: Planning and
Development Department

PROPOSAL
4. Site Plan
The proposal is to develop a multifamily residential community, containing 438




Page 395
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




dwelling units. The site plan, attached as an exhibit, depicts a variety of building
types, including one- and two-story detached and semi-detached homes primarily in
the western portion and three-story apartment buildings in the eastern portion,
closer to 19th Avenue. Vehicular access is shown from a driveway on 19th Avenue
and a secondary driveway on Monona Drive. The common open spaces on the site
total approximately 7.7 percent of the gross area and include a central lawn with
active amenities in the eastern half of the site and a linear open space with passive
recreation elements running through the western portion of the site. The existing
detached sidewalk along 19th Avenue will be retained as part of this proposal and a
shared-use path will be built within an easement dedicated by the developer along
19th Avenue, as required by Stipulation No. 9.




Conceptual Site Plan, Source: Synectic Design

Staff recommends general conformance to this site plan (Stipulation No. 1) to
ensure that the site develops as proposed. The site plan depicts appropriate street
access, additional landscape setbacks adjacent to the existing residential uses,
appropriate orientation of buildings and drive aisles. Development intensity is
focused on the eastern portion of the site, closer to the major arterial of 19th
Avenue.

In order to minimize impacts to the single-family residential neighborhood to the
west, the proposal will be a maximum of one story and 20 feet in height within 100



Page 396
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




feet of the west property line, as required by Stipulation No. 3. To provide additional
landscape buffering between the surrounding uses and increase tree coverage
around the site, Stipulation No. 5 requires enhanced landscaping, including 50
percent two-inch caliper and 50 percent three-inch caliper trees planted 20 feet on
center, in the perimeter setbacks. Additionally, the landscape setback on the west
property edge is 30 feet, providing an additional buffer between the neighborhood to
the west. In order to enhance the open space component of the proposal, there will
be a minimum of five active and passive recreational elements in the common open
space area, as required in Stipulation No. 4.

5. Elevations
The conceptual building elevations depict several one- and two-story detached and
semi-detached homes, along with three-story apartment buildings. Staff
recommends Stipulation No. 2, requiring all buildings to contain architectural
embellishments and detailing, to promote visual interest of the development.




Conceptual Building Elevations, Source: Synectic Design

STUDIES AND POLICIES
6. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached from
the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide
thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. Staff is




Page 397
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




recommending the following stipulations designed to provide enhanced shade on
the site.
• Fifty percent two-inch caliper and 50 percent three-inch caliper trees within
the required landscape setbacks (Stipulation No. 5);
• Landscaping in surface parking areas to achieve 25 percent shade at
maturity (Stipulation No. 6);
• The sidewalks along 19th Avenue and Monona Drive shall be shaded to
provide a minimum of 75 percent shade (Stipulation No. 10).

7. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. The proposed project will maintain the
existing detached sidewalk on 19th Avenue, which will be shaded to a minimum of
75 percent (Stipulation No. 10), creating a high-quality pedestrian environment.
Additionally, staff recommends the following stipulations to advance the Complete
Streets Guiding Principles:
• Visually contrasted pedestrian walkways within the development where they
cross drive aisles (Stipulation No. 7);
• Bicycle parking, consistent with the Walkable Urban (WU) Code standards, to
be provided in a secure location, in addition to guest bicycle parking at a
minimum rate of 0.05 spaces per unit to be located near the clubhouse or
distributed throughout the site (Stipulation No. 8);
• A shared use path, constructed within an easement to be dedicated by the
developer, along 19th Avenue, constructed according to MAG standards
(Stipulation No. 9).

8. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of destinations.
As stipulated, the project will provide bicycle parking spaces, consistent with the
requirements of the Walkable Urban (WU) Code, and provide guest bicycle parking
at a minimum rate of 0.05 spaces per unit to be located near the clubhouse or
distributed throughout the site. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 8.

9. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and




Page 398
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. The application did not
address recycling services.

10. Housing Phoenix
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid
population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000
new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a
primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development
supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by
contributing to a variety housing types that will address the supply shortage at a
more rapid pace while using vacant land in a more sustainable fashion.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
11. As of the writing of this report, staff has received three letters in opposition to this
case. Concerns include traffic, property values, preserving views, and crime.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
12. The Street Transportation Department commented that the developer shall
construct a knuckle design at the corner of 20th Avenue and Monona Drive, no
vehicular access shall be provided to 21st Avenue, and that the developer shall
construct the adjacent streets, including meeting ADA accessibility standards.
These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 11 through 13.

13. The Water Services Department commented that the property has existing water
and sewer mains that can potentially serve the development. In addition, the Water
Services Department commented that capacity is a dynamic condition that can
change over time due to a variety of factors.

14. The Aviation Department commented that the property owner shall record a Notice
to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport in order to disclose the existence,
and operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport (DVT) to future owners or
tenants of the property. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 14.

15. The Parks and Recreation Department commented that a shared use path
easement and a shared use path constructed within the easement is required along
19th Avenue. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 9.

16. The Fire Department commented that there were no anticipated problems with the
referenced case and that the fire code will require water supply to meet fire flow




Page 399
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




standards and marking the fire apparatus access road.

OTHER
17. The site has not been identified as being archeologically sensitive. However, in the
event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all ground
disturbing activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery and the City
of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to
properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 15.

18. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by
the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to require
the form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 16.

19. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be
required.

Findings

1. The requested R-3A zoning district is consistent with the proposed General Plan
Land Use Map designation of Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.

2. As stipulated, the proposed development will include development standards
including height limits, increased setbacks adjacent to existing residential properties,
enhanced landscaping and shade, and open space requirements, that mitigate
impacts to surrounding properties.

3. As stipulated, the proposed development enhances connectivity in the immediate
vicinity by improving adjacent roadways, creating a public shared use path, and
providing shaded detached sidewalks.

Stipulations

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the conceptual site plan date
stamped July 21, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations and approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

2. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing such as
textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size and location, and/or




Page 400
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. The development shall be limited to 1 story and 20 feet in height within 100 feet of the west
property line.

4. The common open space areas shall provide a minimum of 5 active or passive
recreational elements, located throughout the property, as generally shown on the site plan
date stamped July 21, 2022. Recreational elements meeting this requirement shall include,
but are not limited to, swimming pools, playground sets, ramadas, dog parks, fire pits, and
barbeque areas; and shall not include lawn or turf areas, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

5. The perimeter setbacks on all sides of the site shall be landscaped and shall include
minimum 50 percent 2-inch caliper and minimum 50 percent 3-inch caliper trees planted 20
feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the planning and development
department.

6. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper
drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the parking area
and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as approved by Planning and Development
Department.

7. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the Zoning
Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks shall be provided for guests,
with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the clubhouse or distributed
throughout the site and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the Zoning
Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. A 20-foot-wide shared use path easement (SUPE) shall be provided along 19th Avenue
and a minimum 10-foot-wide shared use path (SUP) shall be constructed within the
easement in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the
developer shall work with the Site Planning section on an alternate design through the
technical appeal process.

10. The sidewalks along 19th Avenue and Monona Drive shall be shaded by a structure,
landscaping at maturity, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75 percent




Page 401
Staff Report: Z-34-22-1
August 9, 2022




shade, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

11. The developer shall construct a knuckle design at the corner of 20th Avenue and Monona
Drive connecting the roadway and sidewalk, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

12. No vehicular access shall be provided to 21st Avenue along Monona Drive.

13. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and
other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

14. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and operational
characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of the property. The form
and content of such documents shall be according to the templates and instructions
provided which have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

15. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the developer
shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius of the
discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office to
properly assess the materials.

16. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder's
Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file for record.

Writer
Anthony Grande
August 9, 2022

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped July 21, 2022
Conceptual Building Elevations date stamped April 27, 2022 (10 pages)
Community Correspondence (3 pages)




Page 402
PUD *
IND.PK. Z-49-88 A-1
Z-3-19
Deer Valley Airport ROSE GARDEN LN
Overlay District (DVAO)




20TH AVE
R-2 CP/GCP *
Z-49-88

19TH AVE
IND.PK.
22ND AVE
ROSS AVE




MONONA DR




POTTER DR
IND.PK.*
18TH AVE
Z-101-80

R1-6

21ST DR 21ST AVE
R1-8
17TH DR
MOHAWK LN

C-O *
Z-101-80
IND.PK.* C-2
Z-299-80 Z-120-87
PAD-14 *
Z-101-80
TONOPAH DR

PAD-14 PAD-12 C-O * Z-299-80
C-2 * Z-299-80 C-2
IMiles
JOMAX RD

HAPPY VALLEY RD
Z-34-22

PINNACLE PEAK RD
0.07 0.035 0 0.07
DEER VALLEY DR
DEER VALLEY VILLAGE SR 101
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 UNION HILLS DR

BELL RD

7TH ST
16TH ST
7TH AVE
GREENWAY RD


19TH AVE
I - 17
35TH AVE
51ST AVE 43RD AVE


APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Mack Real Estate Group
FROM:
IND. PK ( 22.46 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
5/16/2022
Z-34-22 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.

22.46 Acres QS 41-24 N-7 TO: R-3A ( 22.46 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
IND. PK N/A N/A
R-3A 494 593

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-34-22.mxd
Page 403
PUD *
IND.PK. Z-49-88 A-1
Z-3-19
Deer Valley Airport ROSE GARDEN LN
Overlay District (DVAO)




20TH AVE
R-2 CP/GCP *
Z-49-88

19TH AVE
IND.PK.
22ND AVE
ROSS AVE




MONONA DR




POTTER DR
IND.PK.*
18TH AVE
Z-101-80

R1-6

21ST DR 21ST AVE
R1-8
17TH DR
MOHAWK LN

C-O *
Z-101-80
IND.PK.* C-2
Z-299-80 Z-120-87
PAD-14 *
Z-101-80
TONOPAH DR

PAD-14 PAD-12 C-O * Z-299-80
C-2 * Z-299-80 C-2
IMiles
JOMAX RD

HAPPY VALLEY RD
Z-34-22

PINNACLE PEAK RD
0.07 0.035 0 0.07
DEER VALLEY DR
DEER VALLEY VILLAGE SR 101
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 UNION HILLS DR

BELL RD

7TH ST
16TH ST
7TH AVE
GREENWAY RD


19TH AVE
I - 17
35TH AVE
51ST AVE 43RD AVE


APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Mack Real Estate Group
FROM:
IND. PK ( 22.46 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
5/16/2022
Z-34-22 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.

22.46 Acres QS 41-24 N-7 TO: R-3A ( 22.46 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
IND. PK N/A N/A
R-3A 494 593

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-34-22.mxd
Page 404
68%',9,6,21 68%',9,6,21 352-(&7'$7$
$31 $31
&3*&3 &3*&3 %8,/',1*$1'6,7(%$6,&6
6<1(&7,& '(6,*1


352-(&7$''5(66 17+$9(18( :HVW8QLYHUVLW\
3+2(1,;$5,=21$ 'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
 
6% $=
 $66(662563$5&(/  W
$0
52:
52:  I
 
6%
/27$5($ 6)$&5(6
    6)$&5(6
%/'*7<3( %/'*7<3( 6)$&5(6

727$/ 6)$&5(6 1(7
6)$&5(6 *5266

68%',9,6,21 352326('86( 3/$11('5(6,'(17,$/'(9(/230(17
$31
5 (;,67,1*=21,1* ,1'3.

352326('=21,1* 5$

'(9(/230(17237,216 3/$11('5(6,'(17,$/'(9(/230(17
),5(+<'5$177<3
%/'*7<3(
68%',9,6,21 /276$/(6 12)255(1721/<
$31
5 %8,/',1*6(7%$&.66%  $'-$&(17727+$9(
  1257+ 6287+3523/,1(
 683(  :(673523/,1(
68%',9,6,21
%/'*7<3( 6%
$31 2)81,76 6((6&+('8/(
),71(665(67506
5 322/(48,3
3529,'('&2002163$&( 6)
%/'*7<3(

52: 3$5.,1*5(48,5('
%('5220 63$&(6 [ 
%('5220 63$&(6 [ 
$XWRGHVN'RFVWK$YHQXH 0RQRQD6)5B&HQWUDOBUYW




%('5220 63$&(6 [ 
727$/3$5.,1*5(48,5('   63$&(6
322/

3$5.,1*3529,'(' 6((6&+('8/(
68%',9,6,21
$31 '(16,7< $&5(6 '8$&
&/8%+286(
5 322/ /($6,1*2)),&(
/$16&$3('$5($:,7+%%4 6 /$16&$3('$5($:,7+%%4 6
6($7,1**5((163$&( 6($7,1**5((163$&(
*$7( 352326('%8,/',1*+(,*+7  0$;+(,*+76725,(6

%8,/',1*2&&83$1&< 6  56,1*/()$0,/<7:2)$0,/<
 508/7,)$0,/<
6% $&/8%+286(%8,/',1*
8&$532576$1'*$5$*(6
68%',9,6,21
$31 &216758&7,217<3( 9%
5
6725,(6 $1'

),5(635,1./(565(48,5(' 3(581,7%$6,6
),5(635,1./(563529,'(' <(6#81,765(48,5('
%/'*7<3(

68%',9,6,21   127(12(;,67,1*),5(+<'5$176216,7(
$31 %/'*7<3(
5
WK$9(18($1'02121$'5,9(6)5

68%',9,6,21
Page 405
$31
%/'*7<3(
5




%/'*7<3(  
 
68%',9,6,21
$31
%/'*7<3(

5 :526(*$5'(1/$1(

6%

:02121$'5,9(
17+$9(
68%',9,6,21
$31
5
7+,6352-(&7
35($33
3+2(1,;$5,=21$

,
15'$9(18( 17+$9(18(


68%',9,6,21 $5,=21$67$7('(372)75$163257$7,21 (;,67,1*6725$*(81,76
$31 $31( $31*
5 $=
,1'3. +06725$*(&25325$7,21 7*) &7( -
9* .9
& .8 &
, ) , $7( 1
7*
57 9
,
&( 2  *(

1&3(*)
QRUWK
6LWH3ODQ &RQFHSW '&0*7
  
QRUWK 'D 
   9,&,1,7<0$3 W H
 

6L    
& 7 J Q H G     
.?
4 3& 8 &
 :

35(/,0,1$5<81,70,;6&+('8/( 3$5.,1*3529,'(' (;3
81,77<3(/(*(1'
2)
81,70,;
7<3(2)63$&( 63$&(6
81,7 '(6,*1 156) 47< 727$/81,7*6) 727$/156)  0,; $FFHVVLEOH6SDFH ZIW$LVOH  5(9,6,216
&RYHUHG6SDFHV 
$ %'50%$7+   6) 6)   *DUDJH6SDFH 
6XUIDFH6SDFHV  &$5*$5$*(
' %'50%$7+   6) 6)   %('5220$ %('5220% %('5220&
7DQGRP6SDFHV 
3 %'50%$7+   6) 6)   7XFN8QGHU6SDFHV  6,1*/()$0,/<81,7 6,1*/()$0,/<81,7 6,1*/()$0,/<81,7
3 %'50%$7+   6) 6)   727$/ 
%'50%$7+  6) 6)  
&2002163$&(
3KDVH 35($33

% %'50%$7+   6) 6)   'UDZQ%\ $6
( %'50%$7+   6) 6)  
%('5220' %('5220( %('5220)
%'50%$7+  6) 6)   5HYLHZG%\ /'%
*$5'(181,7 *$5'(181,7 *$5'(181,7

6',3URMHFW1R 
& %'50%$7+   6) 6)  
) %'50%$7+   6) 6)   'DWH 
%'50%$7+  6) 6)  
6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&




352-(&7727$/6  6) 6)   %('52203 %('52203

3$ 35($33&21&(378$/
6,7(3/$1
6+((7.(<('127(6




6<1(&7,& ' ( 6 , * 1


:HVW8QLYHUVLW\
'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
$=
30

W
I




(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(6
$ *(1(5$/127(
% *(1(5$/127(
& *(1(5$/127(




723DUDSHW 723DUDSHW
     
5RRI 5RRI
     




UG)ORRU UG)ORRU
$XWRGHVN'RFVWK$YHQXH 0RQRQD6)5%XLOGLQJ7\SHBUYW      




QG)ORRU QG)ORRU
     



(;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1'
'(6&5,37,21 678&&20$,1&2/25
0)5 7%'
$
)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU &2/25 6:25,*$0,:+,7(
  ),1,6+ 60227+),1,6+
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2$&&(17&2/25
0)5 7%'
%
(DVW(OHYDWLRQ :HVW(OHYDWLRQ &2/25 6:*5$66/$1'
  ),1,6+ 60227+),1,6+
     
'(6&5,37,21 7,/(&/$'',1*
0)5 7%'
&
&2/25 6:7+81'(5286
60227+
'(6&5,37,21 0(7$/:25.
0)5 7%'
'
&2/25 6:,52125(

723DUDSHW '(6&5,37,21 */$66
   0)5 7%'
5RRI (
   &2/25 &/($5
),1,6+
Page 406
7+$1'02121$08/7,)$0,/<


UG)ORRU
  




QG)ORRU
  
17+$9(




)LUVW)ORRU

%8,/',1*
3+2(1,;$5,=21$


6RXWK(OHYDWLRQ 127)25&216758&7,21

  


&
723DUDSHW )
  
5RRI
  
127)25&216758&7,21
5(9,6,216


UG)ORRU
  




3KDVH 6'
QG)ORRU
   'UDZQ%\

5HYLHZG%\ /'%

6',3URMHFW1R 

'DWH 
)LUVW)ORRU
 6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&




1RUWK(OHYDWLRQ

   $
(;7(5,25(/(9$7,216
6+((7.(<('127(6




6<1(&7,& '(6,*1


:HVW8QLYHUVLW\
'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
$=
30

W
I




(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(6
$*(1(5$/127(
%*(1(5$/127(
&*(1(5$/127(




723DUDSHW 723DUDSHW
     
5RRI 5RRI
     




UG)ORRU UG)ORRU
     
$XWRGHVN'RFVWK$YHQXH 0RQRQD6)5%XLOGLQJ7\SHBUYW




QG)ORRU QG)ORRU
     




(;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1'
)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU '(6&5,37,21 678&&20$,1&2/25
  0)5 7%'
$
&2/25 6:25,*$0,:+,7(
),1,6+ 60227+),1,6+
(DVW(OHYDWLRQ :HVW(OHYDWLRQ '(6&5,37,21 678&&2$&&(17&2/25
 
      0)5 7%'
%
&2/25 6:*5$66/$1'
),1,6+ 60227+),1,6+
'(6&5,37,21 7,/(&/$'',1*
0)5 7%'
&
&2/25 6:7+81'(5286
60227+
723DUDSHW
'(6&5,37,21 0(7$/:25.
  
0)5 7%'
'
5RRI &2/25 6:,52125(
  
'(6&5,37,21 */$66
Page 407
7+$1'02121$08/7,)$0,/<
0)5 7%'
(
&2/25 &/($5
),1,6+


UG)ORRU
  




QG)ORRU
  
17+$9(


%8,/',1*
3+2(1,;$5,=21$
)LUVW)ORRU

127)25&216758&7,21
6RXWK(OHYDWLRQ

  

&
723DUDSHW )
  
5RRI 1
  


127)25&216758&7,21
5(9,6,216



UG)ORRU
  




3KDVH 6'

QG)ORRU 'UDZQ%\ $16
  
5HYLHZG%\ /'%

6',3URMHFW1R 

'DWH 

)LUVW)ORRU
6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&







1RUWK(OHYDWLRQ
 $
   (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216
(;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1' 6+((7.(<('127(6
'(6&5,37,21 678&&20$,1&2/25
0)5 7%'
$
&2/25 6:25,*$0,:+,7(
),1,6+ 60227+),1,6+
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2$&&(17&2/25
0)5 7%'
%
&2/25 6:*5$66/$1'
6<1(&7,& '(6,*1

),1,6+ 60227+),1,6+ :HVW8QLYHUVLW\
'(6&5,37,21 7,/(&/$'',1* 'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
0)5 7%' $=
30
& W
&2/25 6:7+81'(5286
60227+ I

'(6&5,37,21 0(7$/:25.
0)5 7%'
(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(6
' $*(1(5$/127(
&2/25 6:,52125(
%*(1(5$/127(
&*(1(5$/127(
'(6&5,37,21 */$66
0)5 7%'
(
&2/25 &/($5
),1,6+




723DUDSHW 723DUDSHW
     
5RRI 5RRI
     




UG)ORRU UG)ORRU
     
$XWRGHVN'RFVWK$YHQXH 0RQRQD6)5%XLOGLQJ7\SHBUYW




QG)ORRU QG)ORRU
     




)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU
 


(DVW(OHYDWLRQ :HVW(OHYDWLRQ
 
     




723DUDSHW
  
5RRI
Page 408    7+ 02121$08/7,)$0,/<


UG)ORRU
  




QG)ORRU
  
17+$9(



%8,/',1*
3+2(1,;$5,=21$
)LUVW)ORRU
 127)25&216758&7,21

6RXWK(OHYDWLRQ

   
&
723DUDSHW )
  
5RRI 1
  


127)25&216758&7,21
5(9,6,216



UG)ORRU
  




3KDVH 6'

QG)ORRU 'UDZQ%\
  
5HYLHZG%\ /'%

6',3URMHFW1R 

'DWH 

)LUVW)ORRU
6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&







1RUWK(OHYDWLRQ $

   (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216
6+((7.(<('127(6




6<1(&7,& '(6,*1


:HVW8QLYHUVLW\
'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
$=
30

W
I




(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(6
$*(1(5$/127(
%*(1(5$/127(
&*(1(5$/127(




723DUDSHW 723DUDSHW
     
5RRI 5RRI
     




(;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1'
UG)ORRU UG)ORRU '(6&5,37,21 678&&20$,1&2/25
      0)5 7%'
$
&2/25 6:25,*$0,:+,7(
),1,6+ 60227+),1,6+
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2$&&(17&2/25
$XWRGHVN'RFVWK$YHQXH 0RQRQD6)5%XLOGLQJ7\SHBUYW




0)5 7%'
%
&2/25 6:*5$66/$1'
),1,6+ 60227+),1,6+
QG)ORRU QG)ORRU '(6&5,37,21 7,/(&/$'',1*
      0)5 7%'
&
&2/25 6:7+81'(5286
60227+
'(6&5,37,21 0(7$/:25.
0)5 7%'
'
&2/25 6:,52125(

)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU '(6&5,37,21 */$66
  0)5 7%'
(
&2/25 &/($5
),1,6+
(DVW(OHYDWLRQ :HVW(OHYDWLRQ
 
     




723DUDSHW
  
5RRI
  
Page 409
7+$1'02121$08/7,)$0,/<


UG)ORRU
  




QG)ORRU
   17+$9(






)LUVW)ORRU
%8,/',1*
3+2(1,;$5,=21$


127)25&216758&7,21
6RXWK(OHYDWLRQ

  


&
723DUDSHW )
  
5RRI 1
  


127)25&216758&7,21
5(9,6,216



UG)ORRU
  




3KDVH 6'

QG)ORRU 'UDZQ%\ $16
  
5HYLHZG%\ /'%

6',3URMHFW1R 

'DWH 

)LUVW)ORRU 6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&







1RUWK(OHYDWLRQ
 $
   (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216
6+((7.(<('127(6

1 '2:163287&225',1$7(/2&$7,21:,7+*5$',1*$1'
'5$,1$*(3/$13529,'(5,35$32563/$6+%/2&.
1 *877(5 7<3
1 (/(&75,&0(7(53$1(//2&$7,21
1 +($7380363/,76<67(0 7<3
6<1(&7,& ' ( 6 , * 1

1 &21&5(7(7,/(522),1*6<67(029(5+,*+7(03(5$785(
81'(5/$<0(17 7<3 :HVW8QLYHUVLW\
1 :$//02817('(;7(5,25325&+253$7,2/,*+7),;785(,521 'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
25(&203/,$17 7<3 $=
$0
W
1 6+877(56 7<3 I
1 678&&2),1,6+6<67(0 7<3
1 '(&25$7,9(%5$&.(7 7<3
1 )2$032328775,0 7<3
1 ),5(635,1./(5(48,30(17$&&(663$1(/3$,17720$7&+:$//
2&&85621/<$7%8,/',1*6'(6,*1$7('72+$9(635,1./(56
,167$//('6((),5(5$7,1*63/$1),5(635,1./(5$5('()(55('
68%0,77$/
1 +25,=217$/6,',1*6<67(0 7<3
1 *$%/(9(17 7<3




(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(6
 6((6,7(3/$16)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21%8,/',1*
25,(17$7,21$1'250,5525,1*25,(17$7,216+2:1,6)25
5()(5(1&(21/<
 6((*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(3/$1)25%8,/',1*(/(9$7,21
))( ),567)/225
 6((),5(5$7,1*3/$16)25/2&$7,2162)),5(5$7('(;7(5,25
:$//6($9(6$1'23(1,1*3527(&7,2102',)<67$1'$5'81,7
&216758&7,21$65(48,5('
 5()(5726758&785$/(/(&75,&$/0(&+$1,&$/3/80%,1*
'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
 :+(5(,',6&217$,1(',1$127(5()(572,17(5,25'(6,*1
'5$:,1*6
 ,1*(1(5$/6((,''5$:,1*6+((76)25),1,6+3/$15()/(&7('
&(,/,1*3/$1,17(5,25(/(9$7,216),1,6+(6),;785(6$1'
(48,30(17
$XWRGHVN'RFV3LQQDFOH3HDNDQGUG6)5*6)&BUYW




 5()(572'(7$,/6+((76)25$//:,1'2:'225:$//522)$1'
)281'$7,21'(7$,/6




(;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1'
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2),1(6$1'),1,6+
0)5 6,',1*3$,17('
$
),1,6+ 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
6:5(/$;('.+$.,
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2&2856(6$1'),1,6+
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
%
),1,6+ 6:7+81'(5286

'(6&5,37,21 '22566+877(56 $&&(176
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
&
),1,6+ 6:,52125(

'(6&5,37,21 :,1'2:6&2/8016 ($9(6
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
'
),1,6+ 6:612:%281'

'(6&5,37,21 )/$7&21&5(7(522)7,/(
0)5 %$6,62)'(6,*1($*/(522),1*
7+$9(18($1'02121$'5,9(6)5

( ),1,6+ 352'8&76352),/( *2/'(1
' ( ' & ($*/(:(,*+7 /,*+7:(,*+7
Page 410
' $ ' ( &2/25'$5.&+$5&2$/
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW %XLOGLQJ+HLJKW
     


1
1
1
%HDULQJ+7
1   
72:LQGRZ 72:LQGRZ
     
1

$ 1
17+$9(18(
' $
1


1 1
&
1 1
% %
%8,/',1*7<3($ %5'83/(;
3+2(1,;$=

)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU
  127)25&216758&7,21
)LQLVK2SWLRQ 5HDU(OHYDWLRQ )LQLVK2SWLRQ /HIW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ
 
      7*) &7( -
9* .9
, .8 &
, ) , $7( 1
57 9
7* 2
&(
  *(
 &
1&3(*) 
'&0*7
 
'D 
W H
 

6L    
& 
.?
4 3&
)
J Q H G    
8 &
1  :

' & ( & ) ' & (;3
( ' $ "

%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW %XLOGLQJ+HLJKW 127)25&216758&7,21
      5(9,6,216
1
1
1
1
1
1
%HDULQJ+7 %HDULQJ+7
    
72:LQGRZ 72:LQGRZ
     
1 3KDVH &'
&
1 1 1
$ 'UDZQ%\ $16%3&6
1
1 '
$ 1
1 5HYLHZG%\ /'%
&
1 1 
6',3URMHFW1R
& 1
% % 
'DWH
)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU
6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&




 
)LQLVK2SWLRQ5LJKW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ )LQLVK2SWLRQ )URQW(OHYDWLRQ
 
     
$$ (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216
6+((7.(<('127(6
1 '2:163287&225',1$7(/2&$7,21:,7+*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(
3/$13529,'(5,35$32563/$6+%/2&.
1 *877(5 7<3
1 (/(&75,&0(7(53$1(//2&$7,21
1 &21&5(7(7,/(522),1*6<67(029(5+,*+7(03(5$785(
81'(5/$<0(17 7<3
6<1(&7,& ' ( 6 , * 1


1 :$//02817('(;7(5,25325&+253$7,2/,*+7),;785(,52125( :HVW8QLYHUVLW\
&203/,$17 7<3 'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
1 6+877(56 7<3 $=
$0

1 678&&2),1,6+6<67(0 7<3 W
I
1 %2$5'$1'%$77(16,',1*6<67(0 7<3
1 '(&25$7,9(%5$&.(7 7<3
1 )2$032328775,0 7<3
1 ),5(635,1./(5(48,30(17$&&(663$1(/3$,17720$7&+:$//
2&&85621/<$7%8,/',1*6'(6,*1$7('72+$9(635,1./(56
,167$//('6((),5(5$7,1*63/$1),5(635,1./(5$5('()(55('
68%0,77$/
1 *$%/(9(17 7<3




& ) ' (



%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW
  


1
(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(6
 6((6,7(3/$16)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21%8,/',1*
%HDULQJ+7 1 25,(17$7,21$1'250,5525,1*25,(17$7,216+2:1,6)25
  5()(5(1&(21/<
 6((*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(3/$1)25%8,/',1*(/(9$7,21
))( ),567)/225
 6((),5(5$7,1*3/$16)25/2&$7,2162)),5(5$7('(;7(5,25
1
:$//6($9(6$1'23(1,1*3527(&7,2102',)<67$1'$5'81,7
$ &216758&7,21$65(48,5('
1  5()(5726758&785$/(/(&75,&$/0(&+$1,&$/3/80%,1*
'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
$XWRGHVN'RFV3LQQDFOH3HDNDQGUG6)5'*6)&BUYW




 :+(5(,',6&217$,1(',1$127(5()(572,17(5,25'(6,*1
1 '5$:,1*6
 ,1*(1(5$/6((,''5$:,1*6+((76)25),1,6+3/$15()/(&7('
%
&(,/,1*3/$1,17(5,25(/(9$7,216),1,6+(6),;785(6$1'
(48,30(17
)LUVW)ORRU


)LQLVK2SWLRQ %DFN(OHYDWLRQ

  
(;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1'
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2),1(6$1'),1,6+
0)5 %2$5' %$77(13$,17('
$
),1,6+ 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
6:6.'(6&5,37,21 678&&2&2856(6$1'),1,6+
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
%
),1,6+ 6:&211(&7('*5$<

'(6&5,37,21 '2256 6+877(56
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
&
),1,6+ 6:678',2%/8(*5((1
& ' ) ( ( ' ) &
'(6&5,37,21 :,1'2:6&2/8016 ($9(6
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW %XLOGLQJ+HLJKW 0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
7+$9(18($1'02121$'5,9(6)5

      '
),1,6+ 6:612:%281'
Page 411
'(6&5,37,21 $&&(176
1 1
( 0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
),1,6+ 6:,52125(
1 1
1 %HDULQJ+7 1 %HDULQJ+7 '(6&5,37,21 )/$7&21&5(7(522)7,/(
     0)5 %$6,62)'(6,*1($*/(522),1*
) ),1,6+ 352'8&76352),/( *2/'(1
1 1 ($*/(:(,*+7 /,*+7:(,*+7
1
&2/25'$5.&+$5&2$/
1
1 1
$ $
1
1 1
17+$9(18(

1
% %

)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU
 
%8,/',1*7<3($' %5'83/(;
3+2(1,;$=
)LQLVK2SWLRQ/HIW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ )LQLVK2SWLRQ5LJKW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ
 
     


7*) &7( -
9* .9
, .8 &
, ) , $7( 1
57 9
7*
&( 2  *(

1&3(*)
'&0*7
 
'D 
W H
 

6L    
& 7 J Q H G     
.?
4 3& 8 &
 :
' ) ( & ) & (;3



%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW
  
5(9,6,216
1

1
1 1 1 1
1
%HDULQJ+7
 

1
$ 3KDVH &'

'UDZQ%\ $XWKRU

5HYLHZG%\ &KHFNHU
1
6',3URMHFW1R 
%
1 'DWH 
)LUVW)ORRU
 6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&




)LQLVK2SWLRQ)URQW(OHYDWLRQ

  
$$' (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216
6+((7.(<('127(6

1 '2:163287&225',1$7(/2&$7,21:,7+*5$',1*$1'
'5$,1$*(3/$13529,'(5,35$32563/$6+%/2&.
1 *877(5 7<3
1 (/(&75,&0(7(53$1(//2&$7,21
6<1(&7,& ' ( 6 , * 1


1 &21&5(7(7,/(522),1*6<67(029(5+,*+7(03(5$785( :HVW8QLYHUVLW\
81'(5/$<0(17 7<3 'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
1 :$//02817('(;7(5,25325&+253$7,2/,*+7),;785(,521 $=
$0

( ' $ ' ' ' & 25(&203/,$17 7<3 W
I
1 6+877(56 7<3
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW 1 678&&2),1,6+6<67(0 7<3
   1 '(&25$7,9(%5$&.(7 7<3
1 )2$032328775,0 7<3
1 ),5(635,1./(5(48,30(17$&&(663$1(/3$,17720$7&+:$//
2&&85621/<$7%8,/',1*6'(6,*1$7('72+$9(635,1./(56
,167$//('6((),5(5$7,1*63/$1),5(635,1./(5$5('()(55('
68%0,77$/
1 +25,=217$/6,',1*6<67(0 7<3
1 1 *$%/(9(17 7<3
1 1 ),5($/$50%(//2&&85621/<$7%8,/',1*6'(6,*1$7('72
1 +$9(635,1./(56,167$//('6((),5(5$7,1*63/$1),5(
72:LQGRZ
635,1./(5$5('()(55('68%0,77$/
  
1

$ (;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(6
1  6((6,7(3/$16)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21%8,/',1*
25,(17$7,21$1'250,5525,1*25,(17$7,216+2:1,6)25
1
5()(5(1&(21/<
1  6((*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(3/$1)25%8,/',1*(/(9$7,21
))( ),567)/225
& %  6((),5(5$7,1*3/$16)25/2&$7,2162)),5(5$7('(;7(5,25
) :$//6($9(6$1'23(1,1*3527(&7,2102',)<67$1'$5'81,7
)LUVW)ORRU
&216758&7,21$65(48,5('

 5()(5726758&785$/(/(&75,&$/0(&+$1,&$/3/80%,1*
'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
 :+(5(,',6&217$,1(',1$127(5()(572,17(5,25'(6,*1
'5$:,1*6
)LQLVK2SWLRQ %DFN(OHYDWLRQ  ,1*(1(5$/6((,''5$:,1*6+((76)25),1,6+3/$15()/(&7('

   &(,/,1*3/$1,17(5,25(/(9$7,216),1,6+(6),;785(6$1'
$XWRGHVN'RFV3LQQDFOH3HDNDQGUG6)5*6)&BUYW




(48,30(17
 5()(572'(7$,/6+((76)25$//:,1'2:'225:$//522)$1'
)281'$7,21'(7$,/6




( ' $ 1 1 1 ' (
( '
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW %XLOGLQJ+HLJKW
     
( '



1 1

1

1
$

72:LQGRZ 72:LQGRZ
     
1
Page 412 $ 1 1

' 1
0(7(5
7+$9( 02121$'5,9(6)5

3$1(/ 1
& 1 & 1

% %
)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU
 


)LQLVK2SWLRQ /HIW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ )LQLVK2SWLRQ 5LJKW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ
 
     

17+$9(18(


%8,/',1*7<3(% %5
3+2(1,;$=

( ' & & (;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1' 127)25&216758&7,21
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2),1(6$1'),1,6+
0)5 6,',1*3$,17('
$
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW ),1,6+ 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 9*
7*) &7( -
.8 .9
&
   6:5(/$;('.+$., , , ) , $7( 1
7* 57 2
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2&2856(6$1'),1,6+ &(
  *(

0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 1&3(*)
&
% 
),1,6+ 6:7+81'(5286 '&0*7
 
'D 
W H
 

6L    
& 
'(6&5,37,21 '22566+877(56 $&&(176 7
.?
4 3&
)
J Q H G    
8 &
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06  :
1 & 1
1 ),1,6+ 6:,52125( (;3


1 '(6&5,37,21 :,1'2:6&2/8016 ($9(6
1 72:LQGRZ
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 127)25&216758&7,21
   ' 5(9,6,216
),1,6+ 6:612:%281'
1
$
'(6&5,37,21 )/$7&21&5(7(522)7,/(
1 :
0)5 %$6,62)'(6,*1($*/(522),1*
' ( ),1,6+ 352'8&76352),/( *2/'(1
($*/(:(,*+7 /,*+7:(,*+7
1 &2/25'$5.&+$5&2$/
&
1

1 % 3KDVH &'
)LUVW)ORRU
 'UDZQ%\ $16%3&6


)LQLVK2SWLRQ )URQW(OHYDWLRQ 5HYLHZG%\ /'%

  
6',3URMHFW1R 

'DWH 

6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&




$% (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216
6+((7.(<('127(6
1 '2:163287&225',1$7(/2&$7,21:,7+*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(
3/$13529,'(5,35$32563/$6+%/2&.
1 *877(5 7<3
1 (/(&75,&0(7(53$1(//2&$7,21
1 +($7380363/,76<67(0 7<3 ' ( 6 , * 1
1 3(7'2256((7<3,&$/3(7'225,167$//$7,21'(7$,/
6<1(&7,&


1 &21&5(7(7,/(522),1*6<67(029(5+,*+7(03(5$785( :HVW8QLYHUVLW\
81'(5/$<0(17 7<3 'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
1 :$//02817('(;7(5,25325&+253$7,2/,*+7),;785(,52125( $=
$0

&203/,$17 7<3 W
I
1 6+877(56 7<3
1 678&&2),1,6+6<67(0 7<3
1 %2$5'$1'%$77(16,',1*6<67(0 7<3
1 )2$032328775,0 7<3
1 ),5(635,1./(5(48,30(17$&&(663$1(/3$,17720$7&+:$//
2&&85621/<$7%8,/',1*6'(6,*1$7('72+$9(635,1./(56
& ( ' $ ,167$//('6((),5(5$7,1*63/$1),5(635,1./(5$5('()(55('
68%0,77$/
1 +25,=217$/6,',1*6<67(0 7<3
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW 1 *$%/(9(17 7<3
  
1 ),5($/$50%(//2&&85621/<$7%8,/',1*6'(6,*1$7('72+$9(
635,1./(56,167$//('6((),5(5$7,1*63/$1),5(635,1./(5$5(
'()(55('68%0,77$/



1

1
%HDULQJ+7
  (;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(6
 6((6,7(3/$16)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21%8,/',1*
25,(17$7,21$1'250,5525,1*25,(17$7,216+2:1,6)25
1 5()(5(1&(21/<
1
 6((*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(3/$1)25%8,/',1*(/(9$7,21
$ ))( ),567)/225
 6((),5(5$7,1*3/$16)25/2&$7,2162)),5(5$7('(;7(5,25
1 :$//6($9(6$1'23(1,1*3527(&7,2102',)<67$1'$5'81,7
1 1
&216758&7,21$65(48,5('
 5()(5726758&785$/(/(&75,&$/0(&+$1,&$/3/80%,1*
1 '5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
1  :+(5(,',6&217$,1(',1$127(5()(572,17(5,25'(6,*1
%
'5$:,1*6
$XWRGHVN'RFV3LQQDFOH3HDNDQGUG6)5'*6)&BUYW




)LUVW)ORRU  ,1*(1(5$/6((,''5$:,1*6+((76)25),1,6+3/$15()/(&7('
 &(,/,1*3/$1,17(5,25(/(9$7,216),1,6+(6),;785(6$1'
(48,30(17

)LQLVK2SWLRQ %DFN(OHYDWLRQ

  




& ( '
& ( '
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW %XLOGLQJ+HLJKW
     




1

1
1 1
1
Page 413
%HDULQJ+7 %HDULQJ+7
    
7+$9( 02121$'5,9(6)5

1

1 1 :
1 1

$ 1 $
1
1 1
1

1 1

% 1 % 1
)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU
17+$9(18(
 


)LQLVK2SWLRQ /HIW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ )LQLVK2SWLRQ 5LJKW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ
 
     
%8,/',1*7<3(%' %5'83/(;
3+2(1,;$=




7*) &7( -
9* .9
, .8 &
, ) , $7( 1
57 9
7*
&( 2  *(

& ( ' 1&3(*)
'&0*7
 
'D 
(;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1' W H
 

6L    
& 7 J Q H G     
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW '(6&5,37,21 678&&2),1(6$1'),1,6+ .?
4 3& 8 &
0)5 6,',1*3$,17('  :
   $
),1,6+ 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 (;3
1 6:5(/$;('.+$.,
1 '(6&5,37,21 678&&2&2856(6$1'),1,6+
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
% 5(9,6,216
),1,6+ 6:7+81'(5286
1
'(6&5,37,21 '22566+877(56 $&&(176
%HDULQJ+7 0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
&
  ),1,6+ 6:,52125(

1 '(6&5,37,21 :,1'2:6&2/8016 ($9(6
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
$ '
),1,6+ 6:612:%281'
1 3KDVH &'
1
:
'(6&5,37,21 )/$7&21&5(7(522)7,/(
0)5 %$6,62)'(6,*1($*/(522),1* 'UDZQ%\
( ),1,6+ 352'8&76352),/( *2/'(1
($*/(:(,*+7 /,*+7:(,*+7 5HYLHZG%\
1 &2/25'$5.&+$5&2$/
% 6',3URMHFW1R 
1
)LUVW)ORRU
 'DWH 

6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&




)LQLVK2SWLRQ )URQW(OHYDWLRQ

  
$%' (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216
6+((7.(<('127(6
1 '2:163287&225',1$7(/2&$7,21:,7+*5$',1*$1'
'5$,1$*(3/$13529,'(5,35$32563/$6+%/2&.
1 *877(5 7<3
1 (/(&75,&0(7(53$1(//2&$7,21
1 &21&5(7(7,/(522),1*6<67(029(5+,*+7(03(5$785(
81'(5/$<0(17 7<3
6<1(&7,& ' ( 6 , * 1


1 :$//02817('(;7(5,25325&+253$7,2/,*+7),;785(,521 :HVW8QLYHUVLW\
25(&203/,$17 7<3 'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
1 6+877(56 7<3 $=
$0

1 678&&2),1,6+6<67(0 7<3 W
I
1 '(&25$7,9(%5$&.(7 7<3
1 )2$032328775,0 7<3
1 +25,=217$/6,',1*6<67(0 7<3
1 *$%/(9(17 7<3
1 ),5($/$50%(//2&&85621/<$7%8,/',1*6'(6,*1$7('72
+$9(635,1./(56,167$//('6((),5(5$7,1*63/$1),5(
635,1./(5$5('()(55('68%0,77$/




(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(6
 6((6,7(3/$16)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21%8,/',1*
25,(17$7,21$1'250,5525,1*25,(17$7,216+2:1,6)25
5()(5(1&(21/<
 6((*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(3/$1)25%8,/',1*(/(9$7,21
))( ),567)/225
 6((),5(5$7,1*3/$16)25/2&$7,2162)),5(5$7('(;7(5,25
:$//6($9(6$1'23(1,1*3527(&7,2102',)<67$1'$5'81,7
&216758&7,21$65(48,5('
 5()(5726758&785$/(/(&75,&$/0(&+$1,&$/3/80%,1*
'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21
 :+(5(,',6&217$,1(',1$127(5()(572,17(5,25'(6,*1
' & ( & &
' & & ( '5$:,1*6
 ,1*(1(5$/6((,''5$:,1*6+((76)25),1,6+3/$15()/(&7('
&(,/,1*3/$1,17(5,25(/(9$7,216),1,6+(6),;785(6$1'
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW %XLOGLQJ+HLJKW
(48,30(17
     
 5()(572'(7$,/6+((76)25$//:,1'2:'225:$//522)$1'
1 )281'$7,21'(7$,/6
$XWRGHVN'RFV3LQQDFOH3HDNDQGUG6)5*6)&BUYW




1 1
1
%HDULQJ+7QG/HYHO %HDULQJ+7QG/HYHO
     
1 (;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1'
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2),1(6$1'),1,6+
0)5 6,',1*3$,17('
$
),1,6+ 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
$ 6:5(/$;('.+$.,
$
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2&2856(6$1'),1,6+
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
%
),1,6+ 6:7+81'(5286

'(6&5,37,21 '22566+877(56 $&&(176
$ 0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
&
),1,6+ 6:,52125(
6HFRQG)ORRU 6HFRQG)ORRU
     
'(6&5,37,21 :,1'2:6&2/8016 ($9(6
$ 0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06
'
),1,6+ 6:612:%281'

1 '(6&5,37,21 )/$7&21&5(7(522)7,/(
0)5 %$6,62)'(6,*1($*/(522),1*
1 1 ( ),1,6+ 352'8&76352),/( *2/'(1
($*/(:(,*+7 /,*+7:(,*+7
1 &2/25'$5.&+$5&2$/
1
1
7+$9(18( 02121$'5,9(6)5
Page 414
1 1

% % % 1

)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU
 


)LQLVK2SWLRQ 5LJKW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ )LQLVK2SWLRQ 5HDU(OHYDWLRQ
 
     




17+$9(18(




& & ' (
' ( & & 1 &
%/'*7<3(% %5
3+2(1,;$=
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW %XLOGLQJ+HLJKW
     
1 127)25&216758&7,21

1
1 7*) &7( -
9* .9
, .8 &
%HDULQJ+7QG/HYHO %HDULQJ+7QG/HYHO , ) , $7( 1
7* 57 2
  
1
1    &(
  *(
 &
1&3(*)
1
'D
'&0*7
  

W H
 

6L    
1 & 
.?
4 3&
)
J Q H G    
8 &
 :
1 1 (;3



$ 127)25&216758&7,21
5(9,6,216
$
6HFRQG)ORRU 6HFRQG)ORRU
     
$

1
1

1
1
3KDVH &'
1
'UDZQ%\ $16%3&6

5HYLHZG%\ /'%
1 1

6',3URMHFW1R 
% % 1
'DWH 
)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU
 
6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&




)LQLVK2SWLRQ /HIW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ )LQLVK2SWLRQ )URQW(OHYDWLRQ
 
      $& (;7(5,25(/(9$7,216
(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21*(1(5$/127(6 6+((7.(<('127(6
 6((6,7(3/$16)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21%8,/',1*
(;7(5,25),1,6+/(*(1' 25,(17$7,21$1'250,5525,1*25,(17$7,216+2:1,6)25 1 '2:163287&225',1$7(/2&$7,21:,7+*5$',1*$1'
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2),1(6$1'),1,6+ 5()(5(1&(21/< '5$,1$*(3/$13529,'(5,35$32563/$6+%/2&.
0)5 6,',1*3$,17('  6((*5$',1*$1''5$,1$*(3/$1)25%8,/',1*(/(9$7,21 1 *877(5 7<3
$
),1,6+ 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 ))( ),567)/225 1 (/(&75,&0(7(53$1(//2&$7,21
6:5(/$;('.+$.,  6((),5(5$7,1*3/$16)25/2&$7,2162)),5(5$7('(;7(5,25 1 +($7380363/,76<67(0 7<3
'(6&5,37,21 678&&2&2856(6$1'),1,6+ :$//6($9(6$1'23(1,1*3527(&7,2102',)<67$1'$5'81,7
' ( 6 , * 1
1 &21&5(7(7,/(522),1*6<67(029(5+,*+7(03(5$785(
6<1(&7,&

0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 &216758&7,21$65(48,5(' 81'(5/$<0(17 7<3
% :HVW8QLYHUVLW\
),1,6+ 6:7+81'(5286  5()(5726758&785$/(/(&75,&$/0(&+$1,&$/3/80%,1*
1 6+877(56 7<3 'ULYH6XLWH7HPSH
'5$:,1*6)25$'',7,21$/,1)250$7,21 $=
 :+(5(,',6&217$,1(',1$127(5()(572,17(5,25'(6,*1 1 678&&2),1,6+6<67(0 7<3
$0

'(6&5,37,21 '22566+877(56 $&&(176 W
'5$:,1*6 1 )2$032328775,0 7<3 I
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06  ,1*(1(5$/6((,''5$:,1*6+((76)25),1,6+3/$15()/(&7(' 1 ),5(635,1./(5(48,30(17$&&(663$1(/3$,17720$7&+:$//
&
),1,6+ 6:,52125( &(,/,1*3/$1,17(5,25(/(9$7,216),1,6+(6),;785(6$1' 2&&85621/<$7%8,/',1*6'(6,*1$7('72+$9(635,1./(56
(48,30(17 ,167$//('6((),5(5$7,1*63/$1),5(635,1./(5$5('()(55('
'(6&5,37,21 :,1'2:6&2/8016 ($9(6  5()(572'(7$,/6+((76)25$//:,1'2:'225:$//522)$1' 68%0,77$/
0)5 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 )281'$7,21'(7$,/6 1 +25,=217$/6,',1*6<67(0 7<3
'
),1,6+ 6:612:%281' 1 ),5($/$50%(//2&&85621/<$7%8,/',1*6'(6,*1$7('72
+$9(635,1./(56,167$//('6((),5(5$7,1*63/$1),5(
'(6&5,37,21 )/$7&21&5(7(522)7,/( 635,1./(5$5('()(55('68%0,77$/
0)5 %$6,62)'(6,*1($*/(522),1*
( ),1,6+ 352'8&76352),/( *2/'(1
($*/(:(,*+7 /,*+7:(,*+7
&2/25'$5.&+$5&2$/




& ( '
( ' &
$XWRGHVN'RFV3LQQDFOH3HDNDQGUG6)5'*6)&BUYW




%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW %XLOGLQJ+HLJKW
     

1

1
%HDULQJ+7QG/HYHO %HDULQJ+7QG/HYHO
     
1

1 1



$
1




1
6HFRQG)ORRU 6HFRQG)ORRU
1      

$


1

1
7+$9(18( 02121$'5,9(6)5
Page 415
1

1 1



% %

)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU
 




)LQLVK2SWLRQ 5LJKW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ )LQLVK2SWLRQ 5HDU(OHYDWLRQ
17+$9(18(
 
     

& ( '
& ' (
%8,/',1*7<3(&' %5'83/(;
3+2(1,;$=
%XLOGLQJ+HLJKW %XLOGLQJ+HLJKW
     
1


1 7*) &7( -
9* .9
%HDULQJ+7QG/HYHO %HDULQJ+7QG/HYHO , .8 &
, ) , $7( 1
57 9
      7*
&( 2  *(
1 
1&3(*)
'&0*7
1  
'D 
W H
 

6L    
& 7 J Q H G     
.?
4 3& 8 &
 :
1 (;3




5(9,6,216


6HFRQG)ORRU 6HFRQG)ORRU
$    $ 1   


1


1 3KDVH &'
1 1
'UDZQ%\ $16%3&6-
1
5HYLHZG%\ /'%
1

6',3URMHFW1R 
% % 1
1
)LUVW)ORRU )LUVW)ORRU 'DWH 
 
6KHHW
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKHSURSHUW\RI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG:8QLYHUVLW\'U6XLWH7HPSH$]7KLVGUDZLQJLVOLPLWHGWRWKHRULJLQDOXVHIRUZKLFKLWZDVSUHSDUHG&KDQJHVUHSURGXFWLRQVRUDVVLJQLQJWRDQ\WKLUGSDUW\RIWKLVGUDZLQJIRUDQ\RWKHUXVHLVQRWSHUPLWHGZLWKRXWZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6\QHFWLF'HVLJQ,QFRUSRUDWHG&





)LQLVK2SWLRQ /HIW6LGH(OHYDWLRQ

)LQLVK2SWLRQ )URQW(OHYDWLRQ
$&' (;7(5,25(/(9$7,21
     
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: FW: Neighborhood Flyer re - Rezoning Application (Z-34-22-1) and Amendment Application (GPA-DV-2-22-1)
Date: Thursday, May 19, 2022 4:07:45 PM



From: Katy Wills
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 3:42 PM
To: Sarah Stockham
Subject: Neighborhood Flyer re - Rezoning Application (Z-34-22-1) and Amendment Application
(GPA-DV-2-22-1)

Hi Sarah,

I reside at 20635 N. 21st Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85027 and received your flyer relating to the Rezoning
Application (Z-34-22-1) and Amendment Application (GPA-DV-2-22-1) of Mack Real Estate Group. I
oppose these rezoning applications, as the land behind my house has been vacant since
1982 when my house was built, and I would prefer for an apartment complex not to block my
backyard view and potentially affect my real estate property value.

Please let me know if you have any questions relating to my opposition of the application.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Ann and Katy Wills




Page 416
From: Anthony M Grande
To: Anthony M Grande
Subject: FW: regarding rezoning request
Date: Monday, May 23, 2022 11:50:30 AM



From: Mary Dyas
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 10:58 AM
To: Sarah Stockham
Subject: regarding rezoning request

Sarah

This is in regards to a rezoning request case #Z-34-22 from a Industrial Plan to a Residential Plan. I
definitely oppose this plan. I am a homeowner to three houses in this area. Too many factors play into
this changing of plans in our quiet community such as: property values going down, traffic congestion,
crime going up and the trash it would bring in. So I am requesting you to deny this request of rezoning
this application.



Sincerely yours,

Mary Dyas




Page 417
Village Planner
Sarah Stockham
Phoenix City Government

Application: GPA-DV-2-22-1
Address: 20620 N 19th Avenue

We are owners of the property located at 20817 N 20th Avenue. We have been in the area for 20 years,
running our business. We bought in this area because it was and is zoned for industrial use.

It has come to our attention that the property down the street is requesting a zoning change from
industrial to residential. We have some concerns and objections to that zoning.

1. We have been told that there will be an ingress at the corner of Monona and 20th Avenue. This
will allow for the residence to access this property either by going down Monona or coming
down 20th Avenue. This is also going to allow the fire department or any emergency vehicle to
have access to the property.
2. Current traffic allows for semi’s and delivery trucks to come and go. At times they are stacked in
the street waiting to drop off their deliveries or load. There are times when they unload in the
street. The access of any emergency vehicle would be limited by the congestion in the area.
3. Our employees and other businesses employees have access to street parking. This is utilized
on a daily basis. It is not something we can afford to lose. This also adds to the congestion on
the streets. The elimination of this parking would devalue our property.

Having additional traffic accessing these roads will only contribute to the congestion that we experience
on a daily basis. As for access for emergency vehicles, it would be limited by the current traffic and
street parking. These streets cannot support additional any traffic.

I would like to request that the transportation department do a traffic count and an observation of the
current area before allowing this project to proceed with this ingress at this corner.

County Transportation needs to prove 20th street can handle the additional traffic before approving
the increased density. We do not believe it can and are against the access onto 20th street

Until this is resolved we do not support the rezoning.

Michaelene and Steuart Barlow
20817 N 20th Avenue “B”
Phoenix, Az. 85027
623-580-5200

Cc: Anne O’Brian




Page 418
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-34-22-1

Date of VPC Meeting August 11, 2022
Request From Ind. Pk.
Request To R-3A
Proposed Use Multifamily residential
Location Approximately 600 feet south of the southwest corner of
19th Avenue and Rose Garden Lane
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 10-1

This item was heard concurrently with GPA-DV-2-22-1.

There was one speaker that spoke in opposition.

VPC DISCUSSION

STAFF PRESENTATION
Racelle Escolar, staff, provided an overview of the subject site and surrounding area,
the requested General Plan Amendment, and the staff recommendation for GPA-DV-2-
22-1. Ms. Escolar further described the rezoning request, the proposed site plan and
elevations, and the staff recommendation for Z-34-22-1, including the recommended
stipulations.

Ozzie Virgil asked if the subject site is within the DVAO. Ms. Escolar replied that it is
not within the overlay.

Benjamin Tate, representing the applicant with Withey Morris, PLC, provided a
summary of the subject site and surrounding area, the outreach conducted by the
applicant, and the proposed development, noting that the development will contain
mostly one-story buildings in the western portion. Mr. Tate further described the
proposed amenities throughout the site, the proposed vehicular access, and the traffic
analysis conducted by the applicant.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE
Ricardo Romero asked about the estimated rents. Mr. Tate replied with estimated
rents based on current market data, noting that the market may change by the time the
development is completed.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 419
James Sutphen asked about access for emergency services and the traffic generated
by the project, noting that there is significant traffic in the area already. Mr. Tate replied
that the City did not require a detailed traffic impact analysis because the initial review
determined that the amount of traffic generated by this proposal would be less than
existing conditions. He further stated that the two access points is what would be
required for emergency access based on the reviews that the City has conducted to
date.

Mr. Virgil asked about the distance between the single-family homes and the parking.
Mr. Tate replied that the building code requires an eight-foot separation between
buildings and the development will meet that standard. He further stated that the
development would provide the required parking and would provide adequate guest
parking.

Trilese DiLeo asked if there were members of the public signed up to speak on the
item. Ms. Escolar stated that there was one speaker registered for this item.

James Sutphen stated that there was an opposition letter that stated a concern about
traffic and that he shared a concern about traffic.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Jane Koval introduced herself, stating that she lived just south of the proposed
development, and stated a concern about the traffic impact of the proposed
development, noting the existing issues with traffic in the area. She stated a concern
about the environmental impacts of this project combined with another project related to
the airport.

APPLICANT RESPONSE
Mr. Tate stated that there will not be an issue with traffic going north on 21st Avenue
because the driveway to Monona Drive is an ingress only driveway. He further stated
that the project will create additional street parking space due to the elimination of one
curb cut and that the proposal generates a more appropriate amount of traffic compared
with what could be developed by-right on the site.

COMMITTEE DISCUSSION
Ms. DiLeo stated that the traffic generated by the proposal would be less impactful than
the existing conditions due to the scattered entry and exit times expected of a
residential use, compared with an office use.

Chair Grossman agreed with Ms. DiLeo’s comment, adding that an office development
wouldn’t need to come through a zoning process and that there is a need for housing
due to the overall growth of the area.

MOTION
Susan Herber made a motion to recommend approval of Z-34-22-1, per the staff
recommendation. Vice Chair Kenney seconded the motion for approval.

VOTE
10-1, the motion to recommend approval of Z-34-22-1 passes; Members Davenport,
DiLeo, Field, Herber, Lewis, Novak, Romero, Virgil, Kenney, and Grossman in favor;
and committee member Sutphen opposed.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 420
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 421
ATTACHMENT D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
September 1, 2022

ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 1
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-34-22 -1 (Companion Case GPA-DV-2-22-1)
Location: Approximately 600 feet south of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and
Rose Garden Lane
From: IND. PK
To: R-3A
Acreage: 22.46
Proposal: Multifamily Residential
Applicant: Mack Real Estate Group
Owner: TCA Plaza 1, LLC & TCA Plaza II, LLC
Representative: Jason Morris/Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris, PLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Deer Valley 8/11/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 10-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Deer Valley Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Vice Chair Mangum made a MOTION to approve Z-34-22-1, per the Deer Valley
Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Vice Chair Mangum
Second: McCabe
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Busching and Simon
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The requested R-3A zoning district is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land
Use Map designation of Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre.

2. As stipulated, the proposed development will include development standards including
height limits, increased setbacks adjacent to existing residential properties, enhanced
landscaping and shade, and open space requirements, that mitigate impacts to
surrounding properties.




Page 422
3. As stipulated, the proposed development enhances connectivity in the immediate
vicinity by improving adjacent roadways, creating a public shared use path, and
providing shaded detached sidewalks.

Stipulations:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the conceptual site plan date
stamped July 21, 2022, as modified by the following stipulations and approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

2. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing such
as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size and
location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

3. The development shall be limited to 1 story and 20 feet in height within 100 feet of the
west property line.

4. The common open space areas shall provide a minimum of 5 active or passive
recreational elements, located throughout the property, as generally shown on the
site plan date stamped July 21, 2022. Recreational elements meeting this
requirement shall include, but are not limited to, swimming pools, playground sets,
ramadas, dog parks, fire pits, and barbeque areas; and shall not include lawn or turf
areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

5. The perimeter setbacks on all sides of the site shall be landscaped and shall include
minimum 50 percent 2-inch caliper and minimum 50 percent 3-inch caliper trees
planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the planning and
development department.

6. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch
caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the
parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as approved by Planning and
Development Department.

7. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed
of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

8. The developer shall provide secured bicycle parking per Section 1307 of the Zoning
Ordinance. In addition, inverted U- and/or artistic bicycle racks shall be provided for
guests, with a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit, located near the clubhouse or
distributed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of
the Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

9. A 20-foot-wide shared use path easement (SUPE) shall be provided along 19th
Avenue and a minimum 10-foot-wide shared use path (SUP) shall be constructed
within the easement in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where conflicts or




Page 423
restrictions exist, the developer shall work with the Site Planning section on an
alternate design through the technical appeal process.

10. The sidewalks along 19th Avenue and Monona Drive shall be shaded by a structure,
landscaping at maturity, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75
percent shade, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.

11. The developer shall construct a knuckle design at the corner of 20th Avenue and
Monona Drive connecting the roadway and sidewalk, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

12. No vehicular access shall be provided to 21st Avenue along Monona Drive.

13. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping,
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

14. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Deer Valley Airport to future owners or tenants of the
property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the
templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by the
City Attorney.

15. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

16. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, leslie.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 424
Attachment E
Rcvd 8/11/2022




Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Attachment F




08/08/2022 CITY Of- PHO r-:t·HX
AUG 1 O 2022
REZONING CASE# Z-34-22-1 Planning & Oeveli)pment
CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Department

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN-

I BOUGHT MY HOUSE OVER 20 YEARS AGO BASED ON THE LUXURY OF HAVING NO RESIDENCE
BEHIND ME. I AM IN FEAR OF LOSING MY PRIVACY AND HAVING TO WORRY ABOUT
SECURITY ISSUES. I HAVE BEEN BATTLING CANCER FOR THE LAST 2 YEARS AND AM ALREADY IN
A STRESSFUL SITUATION.
IF IT HAS COME TO WHERE I DON'T HAVE A CHOICE IN THE MATTER, I WOULD LIKE THE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TO APPLY 3 MORE BLOCKS LAYERS TO MY BACK WALL AT THEIR
COST TO ENSURE MY PRIVACY.


THANK YOU FOR HEARING MY CONCERNS.
SINCERELY,
DONNA STATEMA (602) 376-9261
20655 N. 21 5T AVE
PHOENIX AZ 85027




Page 432



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-AF-1-
22-6 - Chandler Boulevard Approximately between the 19th and 27th Avenue
Alignments, and 27th Avenue between Chandler Boulevard and the Loop 202
Freeway (Resolution 22070)

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the Street Classification Map designation to reclassify
Chandler Boulevard from Arterial Street to Collector Street and 27th Avenue from
Arterial Street to Local Street.

Summary
Application: GPA-AF-1-22-6
Current Designation: Arterial (Chandler Boulevard and 27th Avenue)
Proposed Designation: Collector (Chandler Boulevard) and Local (27th Avenue)

Owner: Tom Lemon, Reserve 100, LLC
Applicant: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design
Representative: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee heard this case on
June 27, 2022, and recommended approval, by a vote of 5-3.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 4, 2022, and continued
the item to the Sept. 1, 2022, Planning Commission hearing. The Planning
Commission heard this case on Sept. 1, 2022, and recommended denial as filed, and
approval of amending the classification for 27th Avenue to a Local Street.

Location
Chandler Boulevard approximately between the 19th and 27th Avenue alignments, and
27th Avenue between Chandler Boulevard and the Loop 202 Freeway
Council District: 6
Parcel Addresses: N/A




Page 433

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 434
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-AF-1-22-6,
CHANGING THE STREET CLASSIFICATION DESCRIBED
HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-AF-1-22-6 to reclassify 27th

Avenue from Arterial Street to Local Street.

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this street classification map change

as shown below:




Page 435
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 7th day of September

2022.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney

-2- Resolution

Page 436
By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




-3- Resolution



Page 437
Attachment B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS

Application: GPA-AF-1-22-6

Applicant/Representative: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design

Location: Chandler Boulevard approximately between the
19th and 27th Avenue alignments, and 27th Avenue
between Chandler Boulevard and the Loop 202
Freeway

Request: Minor General Plan Amendment to change the
General Plan Street Classification Map designation
on Chandler Boulevard from Arterial Street to
Collector Street; and 27th Avenue from Arterial
Street to Local Street

Reason for Requested Change: To allow the development south of Chandler
Boulevard.

Village Planning Committee Date: Ahwatukee Foothills – June 27, 2022

Staff Recommendation: Approval

Findings:

1) The proposed designation of Chandler Boulevard as a collector and 27th Avenue
as a local street is compatible with the local/residential streets and planned uses
in the area.

2) The request will update the Street Classification Map to allow connectivity on
Chandler Boulevard and 27th Avenue while allowing for the development of a
proposed residential subdivision.

BACKGROUND

The Street Classification Map was first adopted in 1961. The Map was last updated in
2018 with additions and deletions of new platted roadways. The Street Classification
Map provides information on the City’s street network, identifying the alignment and
minimum right-of-way standards for existing and planned streets.

The applicant has developed master plans for approximately 1,050 single-family units,
150 semi-detached units, and 329 multifamily residential units to be constructed within
the 373.48 acres south of Chandler Boulevard. The proposed Street Classification Map
amendment is to reclassify 27th Avenue from a collector to a local roadway.

Page 438
Staff Analysis
GPA-AF-1-22-6
Page 2


Additionally, modifications to a portion of Chandler Boulevard are being requested to
change the roadway classification from an arterial to a collector. The applicant is
proposing to construct bicycle lanes along Chandler Boulevard and detached sidewalks
on the south side of Chandler Boulevard.




Proposed Residential Development
Source: Norris Design

RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS- TRAFFIC; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Provide access
by major streets, with internal circulation handled by a local street system that
discourages through-traffic and provides safe pedestrian travel. Use local and
collector streets, plus feeder bus lines, to bring people into the cores, centers or
corridors.

This modification will maintain the connectivity to and through Chandler Boulevard from
and would allow for the proposed development.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
As of the writing of this report, staff has received 11 letters in opposition to this General
Plan Amendment application. The stated concerns include the increase in traffic, the
concerns of police and fire response, and street safety.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends that the request be approved.


Page 439
Staff Analysis
GPA-AF-1-22-6
Page 3


Approval of this Street Classification Map Amendment will further the goals of the
General Plan and approval is consistent with the recent residential development
patterns in the area.

Writer:
Nayeli Sanchez Luna
June 27, 2022

Exhibits:
Sketch Map
Community Correspondence (24 pages)




Page 440
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-AF-1-22-6 ACRES: N/A REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: Ahwatukee Foothills COUNCIL DISTRICT: 6
APPLICANT: Alan Beaudoin
EXISTING:
Arterial




VD
BL


27TH AVE 19TH AVE
ER
DL
AN
CH



LIBER
TY L N



ARTERIAL
COLLECTOR PECOS RD
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ( ( (
( ( MAJOR ARTERIAL


PROPOSED CHANGE:
Local, Collector and Arterial




VD
BL
ER


27TH AVE 19TH AVE
DL
H AN
C



LIBER
TY L N




PECOS RD
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ( ( (
ARTERIAL
COLLECTOR

( ( MAJOR ARTERIAL
Page 441
From: jon samuelson
To: PDD Ahwatukee Foothills VPC
Subject: Blandford Homes planned neighborhood
Date: Friday, May 6, 2022 11:22:34 PM


Hi. I just read the AFN article about the planned renaming of the new Blandford Homes
community to “Canyon Reserve” and I respectfully request that a different name be selected.
We already have a Canyon Reserve neighborhood in our Village. It’s in MPR on Ray Road at
about 31st St. Less than 5 miles from the new Blandford Homes community currently in the
planning stages. Having 2 communities with the same name will certainly be confusing for
Village residents and delivery drivers. It will also dilute the exclusivity of the high-end
mountainside community on Ray Road.

Thanks for your thoughtful consideration.

Jon Samuelson
Cell: 602.793.3896




Page 442
From: jaslowleeother@gmail.com
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Cc: PDD Ahwatukee Foothills VPC
Subject: Blandford Development
Date: Saturday, May 7, 2022 3:38:18 PM


Real simple: Blandford plans to build 1,500 homes for 5,000 people with 3,000 autos. We need
another Loop 202 on / off ramp to avoid significant congestion. Please consider this necessity before
it’s too late.

Lee Jaslow
3468 W Morgan Ivy Ln
Phoenix, AZ 85045
479-248-1110




Page 443
From: Jenni Harris
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: Chandler Blvd Expansion
Date: Thursday, May 12, 2022 9:12:19 PM


Good Evening Ms Sanchez Luna,

Would you please forward my email to the members of the Ahwatukee Foothills village
planning committee? Thank you.


Dear Members of the planning committee,

I am writing to you to express my concerns about the recent traffic study determination that
found that Chandler Blvd will not require an expansion to manage the new
homes/townhomes/apartments which will be built by Blandford Homes in the upcoming year.
I am a current resident of the Promontory Foothills West community and am obliged to use
this route daily as the only access to our community. Even with current residential volume, the
single lane of traffic in each direction already causes issues. Particularly with
construction/waste/recycle/delivery trucks hindering traffic flow. The addition of another
1000+ single family homes in addition to the planned townhomes and apartments will leave
this single access point oversaturated. Especially when considering the increase in the amount
of construction and delivery trucks that will be utilizing this solitary access road throughout
the time the community is being built. Aside from the significant traffic back up issues that
will certainly arise, the request to leave Chandler Blvd as-is poses a significant risk for our
communities. As the only access point to thousands of homes, the street will act as a funnel for
all traffic flow. This will become painfully obvious in the event of an emergency situation. If
there was a fire involving a home in one of our communities or South Mountain/the Preserve,
the limited access road will hinder families from being able to safely evacuate the area in a
reasonable amount of time. The extension of Liberty Lane will NOT be sufficient to manage
the current and additional traffic.

It is questionable at best that the company providing the traffic impact analysis (Kimley-Horn)
is a subsidiary of Blandford Homes. It is difficult to accept that the results of their analysis are
not biased. But more importantly, it is not Kimley-Horn or even Blandford Homes that will be
put on the spot if there were devastating outcomes in the future because of the decision to
permit Chandler Blvd to be reclassified and maintained at the current 3 lanes. The
consequences of any inability to safely evacuate the communities will be turned back to the
based solely on their desire to avoid spending money on the street expansion even though this
requirement has been well documented for the past several years while the build out of this
state land has been a topic of discussion.

Additionally, the traffic analysis states that the majority of the traffic coming from the west
end of Chandler Blvd will be traveling to access the 202 freeway. While many commuters are
traveling to access the freeway, a significant number of parents and buses use this route to take
children to school in the morning. Because we are all traveling to the same destinations
(schools) at the same time, there are in fact many drivers who will be attempting to use this
single lane stretch of Chandler Blvd at the same time. This will impede traffic flow and
adversely affect attempts to get children to school on time. The Kyrene school district has



Page 444
experienced numerous issues with bus driver shortages this year. Many days we received
automated calls with short notice that the buse would be 30-60 minutes late picking students
up to take them to school. As a result, many parents (including myself) have subsequently
altered plans and now take our children to the school ourselves in the morning. The bus driver
shortages have also resulted in combining more bus routes. And in 2020 when we moved into
Promontory Foothills, we added an additional stop to the route having the bus pick up my
children (there are now at least 15 other students in our community who use the bus). The
result of the additional bus stop and combining routes is that the school bus pick up time for
our community is now 6:42 (for a 7:25 school start time). The planned housing for Canyon
Reserve will undoubtedly result in an increase in the number of students enrolling in the local
schools. Which will mean even more buses/bus stops and more parents trying to access the
single lane road at the same time of day to get our children to school on time.

I urge you to consider the significant level of concern from myself and every community
member I have spoken to about this issue in the past week, when we first became aware of
Blandford's request for reclassification. The response of EVERY homeowner I have spoken to
in my community as well as those in the adjacent communities along the west end of Chandler
Blvd is one of disbelief. Disbelief that after years of the expansion requirement being listed as
part of the plan for whoever purchases and develops the land, that there is suddenly a
possibility that the builder will renegotiate and alter those plans leaving us bottlenecked in our
communities that have only a single access road. I have not encountered a single resident of
any community in west Ahwatukee who supports the idea to leave Chandler Blvd as 3 lanes.
Chandler Blvd already has 4 lanes (2 lanes each direction) east of 17th avenue and the traffic
flows much more smoothly once the lanes open up at that point. I encourage you to come out
to our communities and speak with the constituents to hear how overwhelmingly
unanimously everyone answers that Chandler Blvd must proceed with the planned expansion
in order to accommodate the new community at Canyon Reserve.

Furthermore, I request that the planning committee also takes into serious consideration the
need for additional emergency response access for the west end of Ahwatukee with this large
expansion. The current response time to our community is already unpredictable and
inadequate. In November 2020 another bystander and myself performed CPR on my neighbor
for over 14 minutes AFTER calling 911 while we waited for the emergency response team to
arrive. The firefighters arrived first, but an almost 15 minute response time (1.5 years ago) for
a cardiac arrest call is inadequate. With the building of our community in Promontory
Foothills West, continued building occurring in Calabrea, the Blandford Homes new builds on
Foothills Parkway and now the massive building of Canyon Reserve, we need to reassess the
population based needs for emergency services such as police and fire stations.

I am eager and willing to speak directly with any committee members who would like to
discuss this topic further or have any questions. You can contact me via email or call me on
my cell phone at (520) 609-2438. Thank you for your time and consideration.

A concerned Ahwatukee homeowner, physician, mom and HOA Board member,
Jenni Harris




Page 445
From: Saskia Almasan
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna; PDD Ahwatukee Foothills VPC
Cc: Cory Almasan
Subject: Canyon Reserve Concerns
Date: Thursday, May 12, 2022 1:49:50 PM




Good Afternoon,

We are residents of Promontory in the Ahwatukee Foothills and while excited to see our community grow, we are
concerned about not having sufficient police, ambulance and fire accessibility.

It takes a good 10 mins to get to us from our local fire station and a good 20 from our police station.
With the increase of crime due to the opening of the 202, I have personally called 911 to report suspicious activity
about 10-15 times in the last two years.

It would be helpful if we did have a police sub station and for sure another fire department with all the new
development.

Thank you,
Saskia Almasan
Sent from my iPhone




Page 446
From: JENNIFER AOSSEY
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: Canyon Reserve
Date: Friday, May 13, 2022 1:00:24 PM




Hello, I am a resident of Promontory at Foothills West and wanted to contact you with regards to the information
coming out about the proposed planned community of Canyon Reserve.

I, along with many of my neighbors, have concerns regarding the plan to not widen Chandler Blvd from 19th
Avenue to the western edge of the development where Chandler Blvd turns south. It seems very obvious that the
increase in vehicular traffic is going to create some major issues for those of us west of the development.

My bigger concern is the lack of planning for a police/fire substation. There is already a dangerously long response
time for our neighborhood; adding more residents to the immediate area without increasing the presence of safety
officials sounds like poor planning. As the Blandford group had originally intended to donate land for construction
of a school (which offer was declined) it seems like the land is available for the asking.

Thank you for your attention.

Sincerely,
Jennifer S Aossey
480-695-2126
3459 W Morgan Ivy Ln
Phoenix 85045




Page 447
From: Leslie Dunlop
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna; PDD Ahwatukee Foothills VPC
Subject: Canyon Reserve Concerns
Date: Monday, May 16, 2022 11:54:02 AM




Hello,

As a resident at the Promontory Foothills community, I have concerns after reviewing some of the proposed plans
where Branford Homes plans on building. With leaving Chandler Blvd as is and not expanding to the initial 5 lanes,
there will be a lot of congested traffic in the area. Also, without a fire station near our community, it poses a safety
concern on how quickly a fire truck can reach us with congested traffic.
Additionally, with the amount of homes that will be entering the community, another south 202 freeway exit is
highly recommended. We are seeing a lot of traffic on the 17th Ave exit and are proposing another exit as well near
Shaughnessy or 25th Ave.

Thank you for listening to our concerns.

Thank you,
Leslie Dunlop




Page 448
Nayeli Sanchez Luna

From: Jeff Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 11:28 AM
To: Angie Holdsworth; Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Cc: Jeff Johnson
Subject: Canyon Reserve Development

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged



Good morning

My name is Jeff Johnson and I’m president of the Promontory @ Foothills West community which is west
of the Canyon Reserve Development. Our community has 109 homes and we are at the very west end of
Shaughnessy.

We drive Shaughnessy/Chandler Blvd every day and don’t agree with some of the items in the Traffic
Impact Study.

Chandler Blvd needs to be widened to handle the increased traffic from Canyon Reserve homeowners. This
should include two lanes each way with a center turn lane. Failure to widen this road would mean increase
congestion and safety issues for all residents in this area.

Also there is a need for a fire/police substation to handle the increased residents in the area. When there is
an emergency call from our neighborhood there is a concern regarding the response time by emergency
vehicles. With the increased homes from Canyon Reserve this response time will be longer.

Thanks for your time

Jeff Johnson


Sent from my iPad





Page 449
From: Stephen Whalley
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna; PDD Ahwatukee Foothills VPC; Angie Holdsworth
Subject: Canyon Reserve new development for Blandford Homes
Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 1:40:11 PM


To whom it may concern,

I would like you to seriously consider including a fire and police substation in the new Canyon
Reserve development in Ahwatukee. This is actually needed now even before the planned addition
of 1500 new dwellings by Blandford Homes. I live in Promontory at Foothills West (85045) and it
already takes >15 minutes to get a firetruck, ambulance or police vehicle out here in an emergency.
Home Insurance companies have even turned us down due to the fire station being too far away.
With the 1500 new dwellings and associated vehicles, people and visitors in this area things will only
get worse. A fire and police substation is absolutely essential and a top priority.

I would also say another priority of the developer is to widen Chandler Blvd to two lanes on both
sides from 19th Ave to Shaughnessey Rd. With the increase in residents (>3000) it will also be
essential to have smooth and safe traffic flow though this area for emergency vehicles and
commuters. This road widening should also include additional parking at the 19th Ave trail head for
hikers. There is already too much traffic parked on Chandler Blvd at the weekend and will only
significantly increase with the Blandford Homes.

Please keep me updated on answers to my comments and the ongoing planning for Canyon Reserve.

Thanks, Steve Whalley
3482 W Mountain Vista DR, Phoenix 85045
480-282-1162




Page 450
Nayeli Sanchez Luna

From: Doug & Patti McBane
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 8:51 AM
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: Canyon Reserve Development Concerns
Attachments: Canyon Reserve Proposed Development Impact - Final 051822.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged


Hi Nayeli,

I had planned on attending the Ahwatukee Foothills meeting this Monday but understand it has been cancelled. I spoke
with Enrique and he suggested that I reach out to you with the concerns that I have about the Canyon Reserve proposed
development in Ahwatukee south of Chandler Blvd. I have attached a attached PowerPoint presentation that I wanted to
share at the next VPC Meeting. Enrique shared that a letter may be desired over a presentation and I am happy to
translate this content into a letter if desired. I would like to address the VPC during the June 27th meeting with my
concerns and let me know if you need anything else from me

Doug McBane
dpmcbane@yahoo.com





Page 451
Canyon Reserve
Proposed Project Concerns
Doug McBane
5/18/22
dpmcbane@yahoo.com
Ahwatukee Foothills Resident




Page 452
Why I am here


• Outline my concerns with the Canyon Reserve project as
proposed
• Context
• Top Level Analysis
• Specific Concerns
• Request to the Planning Committee




Page 453
Context: Canyon Reserve & surrounding communities




Page 454
Top Level Analysis

• 44% increase in traffic using Chandler Blvd
to access services1
• 86% increase in traffic accessing SR-202
from 17th street2
• Canyon Reserve has 86% as many homes
as area 1-4 combined
• 44% of all homes east of Desert Foothills
will in Canyon Reserve


1. Assumes traffic from all 5 zones and Canyon
Reserve use the Chandler Blvd/Desert Foothills
Pkwy intersection to access services.
2. Assumes areas 1, 2, 3 and 50% of area 4 use
the 17th street 202 access




Page 455
Specific Concerns

• Access to emergency services
• Both Chandler Blvd and Liberty Lane would be built out much smaller than planned3
• Chandler Blvd planned width reduced from 100ft to 60ft
• Liberty Lane planned “to be a much larger road” would be constructed as a “local road”
• Housing density is inconsistent with existing developments in the area
• Lack of local shopping options (nearest shopping more than 3 miles away on Chandler Blvd)
• Basic service such grocery store, gas station, other retail & services
• Chandler Blvd traffic (shopping access) – Specifically Chandler Blvd and Desert Foothills Parkway intersection
• Overall impact to existing communities
• Increased noise, traffic and reduced quality of life for existing communities


3. Ahwatukee Foothills News, May 11th 2022 Edition




Page 456
Request to the Planning Committee


• Evaluate individual concerns and address appropriately
• Community outreach and involvement
• Engage with HOA’s for developments impacted

• Decision making process
• Transparency
• Rationale and policy references for decisions




Page 457
From: Lawrence Koenen
To: Angie Holdsworth; Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Cc: Council District 6 PCC; Mayor Gallego; Sean Bowie; Mitzi Epstein; Paul Maryniak
Subject: A: Safety Question for new Subdivision as you "plan it out"
Date: Thursday, June 9, 2022 9:18:26 AM
Attachments: image001.png


I apologize for not sending sooner, but sadly I am not really sure my city cares about me.

That said, if you scroll to the end of my note, there are some items I think truly need to be
addressed, and as the city planners, I would have expected you to deal with it for the upcoming
grand subdivision to be built the remaining open land in Ahwatukee. I would ask that you please
consider these for a number of reasons.

1. We badly need a fire station in this area. For any city to have an ISO rating (Insurance
Standards Organization – that rates insurability of land) inside of a city proper at the worst
possible value due to distance of a fire station is nearly inexcusable. We are rated as such.
Either take land from south mountain park or from the new subdivision to correct that issue.
PLEASE! It should be a badge of shame to ALL our city officials that insurers will not cover this
section. We love our police, we love our fire department, but this is simply inexcusable by the
city officials especially if you plan to add over 1000 new homes.
2. You often shut down Chandler Blvd. due to rescues. This completely shuts down egress to
and from a number of subdivisions also a safety hazard since you are using it to park
emergency equipment (totally understand them doing it) or land air rescue (also completely
understand). You need to have a landing pad where this can be addressed. It is after all a
mountain range and you have access points for that park where you land the helicopters.
3. You are already becoming known as the place of death on the 17th exit and add to that Liberty
and the road races on Chandler (and if you honestly think a speed monitoring device will do
much…. Probably need to reconsider. There needs to be lights on both Liberty and 17th and
on 17th and Chandler.
4. From a pure livability perspective, no commercial property in the new subdivisions seems like
just a bad plan.

I apologize for all my notes, but wanted to be on the record and say, if my council person and my
mayor didn’t share this with you folks, well, that is there sin of omission.

Please consider my requests. I only want what is best for the folks in this area not to mention for the
city and its responsibility to those we a entrusted you to protect honor and serve!

Sincerely,
Larry Koenen


From: Council District 6 PCC
Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 at 11:24 AM


Page 458
To: 'Lawrence Koenen'
Subject: RE: Safety Question for Edge of Ahwatukee

Good Afternoon,

I apologize for not getting back to you sooner, but here are the answers to your questions:

1. The reason there is not already another station is partly because there is not funding for it, so
I would attend the Budget meeting in April voicing that you want there to be another station
in Ahwatukee and for there to be funding dedicated to it, here is the link to speak
https://www.phoenix.gov/budget/hearings. We encourage you to have other constituents call
in as well.
2. Chandler and 17th has had traffic studies done by the Streets Department in the past couple
years due to requests similar to yours. These studies came back saying that traffic is not at a
high enough level to warrant adding stop signs or a HAWK signal. However, it is in the queue
to be evaluated for having a full traffic signal there, I can ask what the timeline would be for it,
but they told be that there is a backlog of cases like this one that are backlogged due to
COVID-19 stopping their ability to evaluate back in 2020.
3. Regarding the lack of police, we completely understand. The unfortunate situation is that due
to the lack of personnel there are less than 1,000 Officers patrolling 517 square miles.
Because of this lack of resources, response times are longer and communities like yours are
underserved. The only way to fix this issue is to allow more funding for police and to have
more people applying to become officers. What we recommend you do is to attend the
upcoming Budget Meeting (a kind of council meeting) and speak during the Public Comment
portion and ask for more funding towards the things that you care about. We encourage you
to invite others to attend as well Via WebEx, here is the link that will lead you to being able to
speak at the City Wide meeting on April 2nd and the District 6 Budget hearing on April 5th,
https://www.phoenix.gov/budget/hearings.




Office of Councilman Sal DiCiccio
200 W. Washington St., 11th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003

Office: 602-262-7491
Council Email: District6@phoenix.gov
Facebook: @DiCiccioSal [facebook.com]
Twitter: @Sal_DiCiccio [twitter.com]




Page 459
From: Lawrence Koenen
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 10:20 AM
To: Paul Maryniak
Cc: Council District 8 PCC ; Council District 6 PCC
; Mayor Gallego
Subject: FW: Safety Question for Edge of Ahwatukee

Hi Paul,

Hey I was wondering if maybe you might be able to take the following topic below and see if you
could find anything out. I have tried using the approved addresses above based on the city website
for council representatives and the mayor, but I don’t seem to get a response.

I really don’t think my questions below are unfair, and I was hoping maybe with the help of an
investigative reporter you might be able see what you can find. Would you be willing to see what
you might be able to find for me? Hopefully you can see below that I have been super patient, but I
still have not received any reply. Maybe I have the wrong city I am trying to get someone to respond
from? But very much hoping you might be able to help.

Please and Thank you!
Larry

P.S. – They really just don’t seem to respond. Maybe there are bigger items on the list, but I would
have thought public safety would have ranked higher. – Thanks!


From: Lawrence Koenen
Date: Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 10:09 AM
To: ,
Cc:
Subject: Re: Safety Question for Edge of Ahwatukee

Just curious if anyone will be responding to the below email?

Please and thank you!
Larry Koenen




Page 460
On Feb 8, 2022, at 11:59 AM, Lawrence Koenen
wrote:


Dear Councilmen,

I live on the very edge of Ahwatukee (very SW corner of Phoenix in Promontory @
Foothills West) and I was wondering if one of you folks might be able to help me with a
couple of questions. I am sending this to both of you since I have tried on other
occasions to request help, but I am guessing maybe I either asked the wrong council
person or I don’t fit in district 6 (actually sadly the city doesn’t always recognize us even
being a part of it except for taxes, so maybe the Mayor doesn’t really view us as valued
either ).

However that isn’t where I need help. Mr. Garcia or Mr. DiCiccio, we have one road in
and out of our subdivision for 5 miles (perfect when things are going well, but not so
much when they are not).

1. We need for an additional Fire Station and bypass when the bridge on Chandler
is being used for South Mountain Park rescues.
a. Chandler BLVD is frequently blocked in the summer due to rescues (seems
like after 17th (connecting to S. Mountain 202) creating traffic backups
both directions. There appears to be only one place to drop a chopper
down for rescues from the South Mountain park and this blocks all access
to and from and to the west (with well over 300 homes).
b. There is no fire station on our side beyond that of Foothills Parkway and
when Chandler is blocked west of 17th, it creates a serious concern for
safety.
c. With the city adding a number of subdivisions south of the park, the
number of homes in that area will significantly increase (guessing by
1000) creating more congestion and even greater safety concerns.
2. Need for traffic control or a stop sign on 17th and Chandler
a. As we all know there tends to be significant traffic with all the homes off
of Chandler west of Foothills Village. Many folks are getting off and on to
the 202 by using 17th and honestly through traffic is fast. This leaves folks
entering and exiting from 17th little chance to get on chandler without
placing their lives at risk.
b. In order to provide appropriate safety for some of us getting older, it
would really be good for that intersection to have a light if possible or a
stop sign if not or even a roundabout if that is what it would take.
c. Any chance of getting this completed before some of us will not be able



Page 461
cross onto Chandler with the new subdivisions going in??
3. Finally, city awareness of the area!
a. I am a firm supporter of our folks in blue. I would love to see them more
frequently. But above all, I have lived out here for nearly five years (and
sadly still really don’t know if the dispatchers for the city realize we are a
part of it). And really that latter part is more disturbing in that while I
understand the city continues to grow quickly, is there anything we can
do to have things updated to ensure safety is able to be rendered when it
is needed most. And our local constabulary is great, so please do not read
it any other way!

If there is anything that can be done on these? It would be greatly appreciated. Again,
not sure which of you are on point for us, but if either or both of you might be able to
assist I would be greatly appreciative.

Thanks,
Larry Koenen

3610 W Hidden View Dr.
Phoenix AZ, 85045
*******




Page 462
06/18/22


Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee
Attn: Nayeli Sanchez Luna (nayeli.sanchez.luna@phoenix.gov)
200 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003


Dear Sir/Madam,


I wish to bring to the attention of the Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee (AFVPC) several
concerns that I have with the proposed “Canyon Reserve” development south of Chandler Blvd, west of
17th Ave and east of S Chandler Blvd (see Figure 1). While I respect the right of Blandford Homes to
develop the land they purchased, I have multiple concerns with the development as it has been proposed.
My specific concerns will be outlined below but in general I am concerned that the impact to the
communities east and west along the Chandler Blvd corridor has not been assessed or understood to
facilitate mitigation. With 1500+ housing units being proposed, the development will increase the number
of homes west of 17th Ave nearly 86% and west of Desert Foothills Pkwy nearly 44% while accounting for
15-20% of the developed land in this area. Chandler Blvd is the primary access to shopping and services
at Chandler Blvd and Desert Foothills Pkwy for homes west and north of Desert Foothills Pkwy and to a
lesser extent services east on Chandler Blvd and Ray Road all the way to Interstate 10. The increased
traffic, noise and CO2 emissions will negatively impact the natural environment and quality of life along
the Chandler Blvd corridor.

Concerns

While the Canyon Reserve development which consists of 1050 single family units zoned R1-8 (as well as
150 build to rent and 329 multi-family units), there are no new amenities to support this “small city” sized
development. Specific concerns include:

x Amending the General Plan (GPA-AF-1-22-6) benefits the developer, but this change does not
benefit the city or the existing community and likely harms the community in the long run.
x City Emergency Service coverage will be significantly reduced with 1500+ new housing units in the
area without increased resources or locations. The nearest Fire Department location is near the
Chandler Blvd and Desert Foothills Pkwy intersection more than 3 miles away from the proposed
development and has a single engine and single ambulance.
x Housing density of the proposed development is much higher than most of the current
development in Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee (AFVPC) area of responsibility.
This is inconsistent with the current mix of smaller lot, traditional lot and large lot homes in the
area.
x An increase of 13704 daily trips, 2200 of which are morning and evening commuters likely using
SR-202 resulting in over 11000 local trips daily that rely almost exclusively on Chandler Blvd to
access shopping and services at Chandler Blvd and Desert Foothills Pkwy. Additionally, Chandler
Blvd is heavily relied upon to access shopping and services on Chandler Blvd and Ray Rd. (There is
no access to Chandler Blvd from the SR-202 or vice versa at I-10). This 44% increase in traffic noise
and CO2 emissions will negatively impact all residents living along the Chandler Blvd and Ray Road
corridors.




Page 463
x This 44% increase in traffic, noise and CO2 emissions resulting from lack of local shopping or
services options in this “small city” is inconsistent with the City of Phoenix General Plan’s
commitment to Sustainability which “includes the creation of safe, clean, sustainable
neighborhoods free of pollution”1 , as well as the City Plan’s commitment to Livability and
Efficiency.




Figure 1: City of Phoenix General Plan Land Use Map


Recommendations

I believe a more balanced approach to the Canyon Reserve development would be more in line with the
current City Plan’s guidance and intentions. Recommendations below would mitigate the impact of the
Canyon Reserve development to existing communities, maintain the intrinsic value of the Ahwatukee
Foothills Community, improve safety while meeting the business objectives of Blandford Homes. Specific
recommendations include:

x Reject the application to amend the general plan (GPA-AF-1-22-6) pending a review of the current
zoning of the proposed development. The current zoning decisions were made 30 years ago and
should be reviewed for relevance and consistency with today’s City Planning objectives and goals.
x The R1-8 zoning decision resulting in 1050 new single-family units is now 30 years old and should
be re-evaluated considering the current context and circumstances that could not have been
anticipated 30 years ago. Building homes with a mix more consistent with existing developments
in the Foothills to include a mix of R1-8, R1-10 and R1-18 zoning to reduce the number of single-
family units to approximately 500 single family units would significantly reduce noise, traffic and
CO2 emissions while mitigating the impact on existing developments along Chandler Blvd.
x Rezone some land to support commercial retail to support this “small city” and make it more self-
contained. This would reduce noise, traffic and CO2 mitigating the impact on existing
developments along Chandler Blvd.
x Accelerate the plans and increase funding (above the .14 stations currently planned) for a new
emergency service at 19th and Chandler.


Request

I request that the AFVPC and review and individually address each of the concerns discussed in this letter.
I also request that the developer revisit the proposed development and the elements that are discussed
in this letter and propose alternatives that consider the impact this development will have to the
surrounding community.


Phoenix General Plan 2015 (https://www.phoenix.gov/pdd/planning-zoning/phoenix-general-plan)




Page 464
In conclusion, I appreciate the Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Community’s consideration of my
concerns, recommendations, and request to address these concerns.




Figure 2: Canyon Reserve Proposed Development



Regards,




Doug McBane
dpmcbane@yahoo.com
Desert Foothills Resident




Page 465
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-AF-1-22-6

Date of VPC Meeting June 27, 2022
Request From Arterial
Request To Arterial, Collector, and Local
Location Chandler Boulevard approximately between the 19th
and 27th Avenue alignments, and 27th Avenue between
Chandler Boulevard and the Loop 202 Freeway
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 5-3


VPC DISCUSSION:

Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an overview of the general plan amendment
GPA-AF-1-22-6. Ms. Sanchez Luna discussed the location of the site, the requested
street classification for Chandler Boulevard and 27th Avenue and provided some
background information on the Street Classification Map. Ms. Sanchez Luna
summarized the proposed development south of Chandler Boulevard noting the
different types of residential units and the improvements along Chandler Boulevard. Ms.
Sanchez Luna informed the committee that eleven letters of opposition had been
received from the community and that major concerns included the increase in traffic
within the village, street safety, and emergency vehicle response times. Ms. Sanchez
Luna concluded the presentation by providing the staff findings and the
recommendation for approval for the general plan amendment GPA-AF-1-22-6.

Jennifer Meyers, representing the applicant with Norris Design, provided an overview
for the proposed general plan amendment GPA-AF-1-22-6. Ms. Meyers informed the
committee that the name for the proposed development had been changed to Upper
Canyon and provided the history of the site including the purchase of the site, the
changes to the Street Classification Map, and the filing for the General Plan
Amendment for Chandler Boulevard. Ms. Meyers displayed the Loop 202 selected
alternative that removed 25th Avenue from design and planned the intersection on 17th
Avenue instead. Ms. Meyers summarized the existing street classifications and street
conditions for Chandler Boulevard and 27th Avenue and noted that an interchange is
not planned for 27th Avenue. Ms. Meyers displayed the proposed street classification
and the street conditions for Chandler Boulevard and 27th Avenue which would include
parallel parking for adjacent trails and bicycle lanes with detached sidewalks. Ms.
Meyers summarized their neighborhood outreach and the concerns that they have

200 West Washington Street, 3 rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 466
Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-AF-1-22-6
June 27, 2022
Page 2

received from the public including parallel parking along Chandler Boulevard, speeding
concerns, and the reduction of lanes in both directions of Chandler Boulevard. Ms.
Meyers concluded the presentation by displaying the proposed timeline for GPA-AF-1-
22-6 and summarizing the reasons why the general plan amendment was needed for
the proposed development.

Questions from the committee:
Darin Fisher stated that he had concerns with the proposed parallel parking along
Chandler Boulevard and asked the applicant to explain how vehicles would avoid
opening their car doors into oncoming traffic. Ms. Meyers stated that the bicycle lane
would act as a buffer on the north side of the road. Mr. Fisher stated that his concern
was for the other side of the parallel parking spot, the driver would have to open their
car door on incoming traffic and that it would create a hazardous condition along
Chandler Boulevard. Ms. Meyers stated that Norris Design had been working with the
Street Transportation Department and that the parallel parking was requested by the
Street Transportation Department as an improvement for Chandler Boulevard. Mr.
Fisher stated that even if the Street Transportation Department requested the parallel
parking, it would still create a hazard along Chandler Boulevard. Mr. Fisher stated that
when vehicles leave a parking space, the only direction that drivers would be able to go
would be west, which would result in a dead-end street. Mr. Fisher asked how U-turns
would be prevented along Chandler Boulevard. Ms. Meyers stated that she was unable
to answer that question at this time. Mr. Fisher stated that he wasn’t opposed to the
additional parking for the adjacent trails, but that the proposed parking design would
create numerous hazards. Mr. Fisher asked how the community west of the proposed
development would be better served with the reduction of traffic lanes along Chandler
Boulevard. Tom Lemon, with the applicant’s team, stated that his team has been
working with the City of Phoenix for approximately a year and stated that they were
aware of the proposed street classification designation before purchasing the land and
stated that they planned to reduce the number of lanes if they had the opportunity to
purchase the land south of Chandler Boulevard. Mr. Lemon stated that Liberty Lane
would act as a reliever from Chandler Boulevard and added that Shaughnessy Road,
located west of Chandler Boulevard, was also built with one lane in each direction and
one turning lane so Chandler Boulevard as a collector would be compatible with the
existing road to the west. Mr. Lemon added that Liberty Lane would act as a traffic
reliever for Chandler Boulevard and stated that the Streets Transportation Department
requested the 28 parking spaces adjacent to the trail. Mr. Lemon noted that the bicycle
lane, detached sidewalks, and parallel parking spaces would all benefit the community.
Jose Castillo, with the applicant’s team, stated that if the road was built with 5 traffic
lanes rather than the proposed 3, it would cause an increase in vehicle speed and
stated that the reduction of lanes would reduce the urban heat island effect in the
Ahwatukee Foothills Village. Mr. Fisher stated that over 300 acres will be used to
develop housing in the Ahwatukee Foothills Village and as a result, the urban heat
island effect would still be created. Mr. Fisher stated that traffic will be forced to go
through Liberty Lane and that traffic will lead into the intersection of 17th Avenue and
Liberty Lane which is one of the most dangerous traffic intersections within the village.
Mr. Fisher stated that the reduction of traffic lanes would add to the traffic on 17th

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 467
Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-AF-1-22-6
June 27, 2022
Page 3

Avenue and Liberty Lane which would create hazardous street conditions.

Chair Spencer Elliott asked if there had been any traffic studies that indicated which
time of day would Chandler Boulevard have the most traffic congestion. Chuck Wright,
with the applicant’s team, displayed the proposed street composition in relation to the
proposed development and stated that a traffic signalization of 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane was part of the development and stated that the people would still take the
shortest route and added that traffic through Chandler Boulevard and Liberty Lane
would be the same since one is not shorter than the other. Mr. Wright also stated that
people coming out of the freeway would most likely use Liberty Lane rather than
Chandler Boulevard. Mr. Wright stated that there are still two different methods to go
west within Ahwatukee Foothills which would be on Chandler Boulevard and Liberty
Lane.

Mr. Fisher asked what the proposed time frame would be from the full development of
the proposed residential development south of Chandler Boulevard. Mr. Lemon stated
that it would depend on the housing market conditions and stated that the developer
would like to break ground either at the end of 2022 or and the beginning of 2023 and
stated that it would take about four years for the completion of the proposed residential
development. Mr. Fisher stated that there would be an active construction zone and
stated that this would also add to the traffic on the west portion of the village. Mr.
Lemon stated that the construction traffic will utilize the same street as the rest of the
community and added that the first phase of improvements would be on Liberty Lane
and 27th Avenue. Mr. Lemon stated that a traffic control plan will be used to ensure that
traffic moves smoothly along Chandler Boulevard. Mr. Fisher asked if there will be a
safety issue with construction equipment having to drive along Chandler Boulevard in
addition to the parallel parking. Mr. Lemon stated that there is a potential hazard but
added that the trails are primarily used during the weekends rather than during typical
work hours and stated that the existing parking condition is not suitable for Chandler
Boulevard and that the parallel parking spots reduce unsafe parking along the road.

Public Comments:
Doug McBane stated that he would like the committee to recommend denial of the
proposed GPA-AF-1-22-6 and stated that the PCD has not been updated accordingly
over the passage of time. Mr. McBane stated that there are no local services that would
serve the community and stated that the proposed development would result in over
11,000 additional daily trips that are not commute related and as a result, it would
increase traffic from Upper Canyon to Desert Foothills. In addition, Mr. McBane added
that the proposed development would increase the surrounding noise pollution, traffic,
and carbon emissions. Mr. McBane stated that he would like to hear about the impact
on the neighborhoods east of the proposed development and noted that the proposed
housing density is not consistent with the surrounding area and requests that the
proposed development have a less density. Mr. McBane concluded his public comment
by stating that he is not opposed to development but would appreciate a lower density
designation and for the development to be built at a reasonable rate. Ms. Meyers stated
that they understood the lack of services and stated that the PCD originally planned

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 468
Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-AF-1-22-6
June 27, 2022
Page 4

over 300 additional homes north of Chandler Boulevard and stated that this would no
longer be built. Ms. Meyers added that the impact fees will assist the situation with the
fire station, water, sewer, and streets as part of the developer’s responsibility. Mr.
Lemon stated that the concerns have been taken into consideration and noted that this
is an infill site and that the proposed development is ensuring numerous improvements
and that he understands that services would be needed. Mr. McBane asked for
clarification on what discussions the applicant has had with the City of Phoenix. Mr.
Lemon stated that the applicant’s team has been in contact with the fire department
and that the development proposal gets routed to the Police Department as well as all
the departments within the City. Mr. Lemon noted that through numerous discussions
with the City they have been able to modify the proposed development to have
numerous benefits to the Ahwatukee Foothills Village. Mr. McBane stated that the
nearest grocery store was Safeway and added that even with the proposed residential
units, the citizens of Ahwatukee Foothills will still utilize Chandler Boulevard rather than
Liberty Lane. Mr. McBane added that the proposed development is not supportive of the
current community conditions and that this would negatively impact the residents east of
the development.

Michael Buzinski stated that there were contradictions with what was proposed by the
City in 2016. Mr. Buzinski stated that in 2016, the City of Phoenix stated that 27th
Avenue was no longer an option for an intersection to Loop 202 and stated that
whoever purchased the land south of Chandler Boulevard would be required to build the
road as an arterial. Mr. Buzinski stated that the residential development west of 19th
Avenue had a single entry point along Chandler Boulevard and added that this has
become a concern due to the lack of emergency vehicle response within that
neighborhood. Mr. Buzinski concluded his public comment by stating that the proposed
residential development would add to the traffic congestion and would significantly
reduce street safety at the proposed intersections and that any high-density
development would increase traffic congestion even more than single-family residential
homes. Mr. Wright stated that there are significant improvements on Liberty Lane and
Chandler Boulevard and that both would act as different channels for traffic. Mr.
Buzinski stated the proposed improvements would not benefit the residents that have
lived in the area since Pecos Road was removed as an alternative access point. Mr.
Wright stated that the current street capacity was at 50 percent and that having
Chandler Boulevard built as an arterial would not benefit the community since the street
capacity and the demand should match one another. Mr. Buzinski asked if the
applicant had any comment on the reduction of the speed limit on Chandler Boulevard.
Mr. Wright stated that he would let City staff answer the question. Ms. Sanchez Luna
stated that the applicant has been working with the Street Transportation Department
and stated that she would reach out to their department to get clarification on the
proposed speed limit for Chandler Boulevard and contact Mr. Buzinski at a later date.

Committee Discussion:
Max Masel stated that the Committee has been discussing this proposal for over two
hours and that he appreciated that the applicant has been working with the City of
Phoenix regarding the proposed development and that this has been a vision of

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 469
Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-AF-1-22-6
June 27, 2022
Page 5

Ahwatukee Foothills since approximately 1982. Mr. Masel stated that he would like to
make a motion to approve the general plan amendment request.

Motion:
Max Masel motioned to recommend approval of GPA-AF-1-22-6 per the staff
recommendation. Jerry Youhanaie seconded the motion.

Chair Elliott stated that he would like additional parking to be provided at the trails in
addition to the ones that will be provided along Chandler Boulevard.

Mr. Fisher stated that he understood that there had been a lot of discussion between
the applicant and the City of Phoenix and stated that this at first glance should be a
simple request but with the addition of neighborhood meetings, letters of opposition, and
today’s public comments it had been clear that this was not a simple request. Mr. Fisher
stated that he would like Committee Member Masel to amend his motion.

Mike Maloney asked for clarification on the motion language. Mr. Masel stated that the
motion language could be found in the request within the agenda that was presented to
the committee prior to the meeting. Mr. Maloney stated that the language would be in
Agenda Item No. 4.

Chair Elliott stated that the motion could be amended to include other information
Mr. Fisher stated that Committee Member Masel has not amended his motion.
Chair Elliot stated that he appreciated the transparency between the applicant and the
Committee and that he would like the Planning Commission to consider additional
parking for the trail heads other than what is proposed with the general plan
amendment. Mr. Fisher stated that a motion was already presented, and that the
Committee had to vote on it. Mr. Masel stated that stipulations could not be added to
general plan amendments. Chair Elliot added that the committee could add comments
or recommendations. Ms. Sanchez Luna stated that general plan amendments do not
have any stipulations but stated that the Village Planning Committee Recommendation
Forms had a section for staff comments where certain comments could be given to the
Planning Commission. Chair Elliot asked the committee if there were any comments
that they would like to add in addition to the parking comment that he had proposed.
Chair Elliott stated that he would like additional parking to be provided at the trails in
addition to the ones that will be provided along Chandler Boulevard.

Martha Neese requested that the motion be read again. Mr. Maloney stated that the
motion was to recommend approval to amend the General Plan Street Classification
Map on Chandler Boulevard approximately between the 19th Avenue and 27th Avenue
alignments, and 27th Avenue between Chandler Boulevard and the Loop 202 Freeway
from an Arterial to Local, Collector, and Arterial.

Vote:
5-3, Motion to approve passed, with Committee Members, Masel, Meier, Youhanaie
Gasparro, and Elliott, in favor and Committee Members Fisher, Neese, and Maloney in

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 470
Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-AF-1-22-6
June 27, 2022
Page 6

opposition.

Vice Chair Andrew Gasparro asked staff if they had received any additional speaker
cards or any more registrations to speak besides the two citizens that provided their
public comments. Ms. Sanchez Luna stated that staff had received numerous letters of
opposition, but that those were provided in the staff report and that there were only two
people who had registered to speak which were the two individuals that provided their
public comment.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 471
ATTACHMENT D


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
September 1, 2022

ITEM NO: 10
DISTRICT NO.: 6
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Continued from August 4, 2022)
Location: Chandler Boulevard approximately between the 19th and 27th Avenue
alignments, and 27th Avenue between Chandler Boulevard and the Loop
202 Freeway
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Street
Classification Map designation on Chandler Boulevard from Arterial Street
to Collector Street; and 27th Avenue from Arterial Street to Local Street
Applicant: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design
Owner: Tom Lemon, Reserve 100, LLC
Representative: Alan Beaudoin, Norris Design

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Ahwatukee Foothills 6/27/2022 Approval. Vote: 5-3.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Denial as filed, approval of amending the classification
of 27th Avenue to a local street.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Perez made a MOTION to deny GPA-AF-1-22-6 as filed, and
approve amending the classification of 27th Avenue to a local street.

Maker: Perez
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Busching and Simon
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposed designation of 27th Avenue as a local street is compatible with the
local/residential streets and planned uses in the area.

2. The request will update the Street Classification Map to allow connectivity on Chandler
Boulevard and 27th Avenue while allowing for the development of a proposed
residential subdivision.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-261-8980, leslie.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.




Page 472
$WWDFKPHQW(


From: David Winter
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject: Hwy 202 Exit 63 at Chandler Blvd
Date: Monday, June 27, 2022 10:21:08 PM


Please strongly work to have this exit put in. It is where Hwy 202 and Chandler Blvd meet. There are hundreds of homes in
Foothills Reserve and Promontory who can make great use of this exit and avoid creating the congestion and thoroughfare
speeding associated along Chandler Blvd. and S 17th Ave.

Add to this the 373 acre development of "Canyon Reserve" that will put enormous pressure on W Liberty Ln and S
17th Ave. Estimated over 13000 vehicles per day.

Installing this exit solves a number of future problems, and will save lives.

Please give this exit addition your most serious consideration and help our district to be the peaceful community it is
into the future.

Sincerely,

David Winter




Page 473
07/02/22


Attn: racelle.escolar@phoenix.gov
200 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Agenda Item: GPA-AF-1-22-6


Dear Sir/Madam,


I wish to bring to the attention of the City of Phoenix Planning Commission several concerns that I have
with the proposed “Upper Canyon” (formerly Canyon Reserve) development south of Chandler Blvd, west
of 17th Ave and east of S Chandler Blvd (see Figure 1). While I respect the right of Blandford Homes to
develop the land they purchased, I have multiple concerns with the development as it has been proposed.
My specific concerns will be outlined below but in general I am concerned that the impact to the
communities east and west along the Chandler Blvd corridor has not been assessed or understood to
facilitate mitigation. With 1500+ housing units being proposed, the development will increase the number
of homes west of 17th Ave nearly 86% and west of Desert Foothills Pkwy nearly 44% while accounting for
15-20% of the developed land in this area. Chandler Blvd is the primary access to shopping and services
at Chandler Blvd and Desert Foothills Pkwy for homes west and north of Desert Foothills Pkwy and to a
lesser extent services east on Chandler Blvd and Ray Road all the way to Interstate 10. The increased
traffic, noise and CO2 emissions will negatively impact the natural environment and quality of life along
the Chandler Blvd corridor.

Concerns

While the Canyon Reserve development which consists of 1050 single family units zoned R1-8 (as well as
150 build to rent and 329 multi-family units), there are no new amenities to support this “small city” sized
development. Specific concerns include:

x Amending the General Plan (GPA-AF-1-22-6) benefits the developer, but this change does not
benefit the city or the existing community and likely harms the community in the long run.
x City Emergency Service coverage will be significantly reduced with 1500+ new housing units in the
area without increased resources or locations. The nearest Fire Department location is near the
Chandler Blvd and Desert Foothills Pkwy intersection more than 3 miles away from the proposed
development and has a single engine and single ambulance. The City Plans for emergency services
is this area are severely underfunded and expose the City to increased risk.
x Housing density of the proposed development is much higher than most of the current
development in Ahwatukee Foothills area and the proposed mix of new housing is inconsistent
with the current mix of home and lot sizes in the area.
x An increase of 13704 daily trips, 2200 of which are morning and evening commuters likely using
SR-202 resulting in over 11000 local trips daily that rely almost exclusively on Chandler Blvd to
access shopping and services at Chandler Blvd and Desert Foothills Pkwy. Additionally, Chandler
Blvd is heavily relied upon to access shopping and services on Chandler Blvd and Ray Rd. (There is
no access to Chandler Blvd from the SR-202 or vice versa at I-10). This 44% increase in traffic noise
and CO2 emissions will negatively impact all residents living along the Chandler Blvd and Ray Road
corridors.




Page 474
x This 44% increase in traffic, noise and CO2 emissions resulting from lack of local shopping or
services options in this “small city” is inconsistent with the City of Phoenix General Plan’s
commitment to Sustainability which “includes the creation of safe, clean, sustainable
neighborhoods free of pollution”1 , as well as the City Plan’s commitment to Livability and
Efficiency resulting in something as simple as getting a gallon of milk will be a 6 mile round trip.




Figure 1: City of Phoenix General Plan Land Use Map


Recommendations

I believe a more balanced approach to the Canyon Reserve development would be more in line with the
current City Plan’s guidance and intentions. Recommendations below would mitigate the impact of the
Canyon Reserve development to existing communities, maintain the intrinsic value of the Ahwatukee
Foothills Community, improve safety while meeting the business objectives of Blandford Homes. Specific
recommendations include:

x Reject the application to amend the general plan (GPA-AF-1-22-6) pending a review of the current
zoning of the proposed development. The current zoning decisions were made 30 years ago and
should be reviewed for relevance and consistency with today’s City Planning objectives and goals.
x The R1-8 zoning decision resulting in 1050 new single-family units is now 30 years old and should
be re-evaluated considering the current context and circumstances that could not have been
anticipated 30 years ago. Building homes with a mix more consistent with existing developments
in the Foothills to include a mix of R1-8, R1-10 and R1-18 zoning to reduce the number of single-
family units to approximately 500 single family units would significantly reduce noise, traffic and
CO2 emissions while mitigating the impact on existing developments along Chandler Blvd.
x Rezone some land to support commercial retail to support this “small city” and make it more self-
contained. This would reduce noise, traffic and CO2 mitigating the impact on existing
developments along Chandler Blvd.
x Accelerate the plans and increase funding (above the .14 stations currently planned) for a new
emergency service at 19th and Chandler.
x Use impact fees from this development to address the concerns above and mitigate the impact
of this “small city” sized development on the surrounding community.


Request

I request that the Planning Commission review and address each of the concerns discussed in this letter.
I also request that the developer revisit the proposed development and the elements that are discussed


Phoenix General Plan 2015 (https://www.phoenix.gov/pdd/planning-zoning/phoenix-general-plan)




Page 475
in this letter and propose alternatives that consider the impact this development will have to the
surrounding community.

In conclusion, I appreciate the City of Phoenix Planning Commission’s consideration of my concerns,
recommendations, and request to address these concerns.




Figure 2: Upper Canyon Proposed Development


Regards,




Doug McBane
dpmcbane@yahoo.com
C: (408) 804-3831
Desert Foothills Resident




Page 476
Racelle Escolar

From: TIMOTHY GOODING
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 11:41 AM
To: Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee
Attachments: city counsel letter.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged


Ms.SanchezͲLuna,

AttachedpleasefindourcommentsandconcernsregardingthedecisiontorecommenddowngradingtheChandlerBlvd
extension.

PleaseacknowledgereceivingthisemailandthattheletterwillbeconsideredattheCityPlanningCommissionmeeting
onAugust4,2022.

Thankyou



Dr.TimothyGooding





Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
From: Dawn Paschke
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Planning Commission Meeting - August 4th, 6pm - Item #17, Case #GPA-AF-1-22-6
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 3:56:12 PM


ITEM # 17 CASE # GPA-AF-1-22-6

STREET CLASSIFICATION - MAP AMENDMENT

My husband and I live in Promontory at Foothills West.

I do not see the change; making Chandler Blvd between 19th and 27th Ave a Collector Street
(2 lane) instead of an Arterial Street (4 lane), a "Minor General Plan Amendment". I see this
change as a MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE.

- Currently our residence and the area affected by the changes on West Chandler Blvd are
OUTSIDE THE ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE TIME OF THE PHOENIX FIRE
DEPARTMENT per Executive Assistant Chief Scott Walker at the Ahwatukee Foothills
Village Planning Committee Meeting held on June 27, 2022.

- According to Executive Assistant Chief Scott Walker, IF the money can be raised, the new
fire station close to the Bursera Trailhead might be built in 4-6 YEARS.

- The insurance company we have had for years would not cover our new home, because it is
OUTSIDE THE ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE TIME FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

- The Upper Canyon developer is ADDING OVER 1000 HOMES.

- There is ONE WAY IN and ONE WAY OUT of all the homes to the west of the new Upper
Canyon development.

- With the additional traffic on Chandler Blvd RESPONSE TIME FOR EMERGENCY
SERVICES WILL BE EVEN LONGER.

- If there is a wildfire emergency (the homes in Promontory at Foothills West and the homes
on the north side of Chandler are surrounded by South Mountain) you will be trying to
evacuate all those homes on a two lane road.

- The developer is adding parallel parking on the north side of Chandler at the trailhead.
Those cars will be pointing toward, pulling out onto a single lane, and moving toward a
DEAD END. My bet is they will make illegal u-turns either at the parallel parking or at the
Chandler/Shaughnessey intersection. And accidents on that stretch are going to go up.

- If there is an accident on a two lane road; how do other vehicles get around it and how do
emergency services get around it if needed further down that road.

- With the heavy construction slated for the Upper Canyon development and the heavy
equipment that will be using Chandler Blvd. traffic is going to be a nightmare and again...a
SAFETY ISSUE.




Page 481
- The Upper Canyon developer says Liberty Lane will be a relief for Chandler Blvd, BUT the
closest services (grocery, gas, drug store, restaurants) are at Chandler and Desert Foothills
Pkwy. The majority of traffic will continue to use Chandler Blvd.

Please consider all the ways this can add to the stress already on the communities to the west
and the safety issues that can be potentially caused by leaving Chandler a two lane road.

Thank you for your time and consideration of this SAFETY ISSUE.
Dawn Paschke
15914 S. 34th Dr
Phoenix, AZ 85045




Page 482
From: mary balsie
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Item number 17 and Case number GPA-AF-1-22-6
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 2:48:47 PM


Good afternoon,
I have concerns with the Amendment to change Chandler Blvd from an Arterial (4 lane) to a
Collector (2 lane) road. Upper Canyon development.

1. The increase in traffic with 1000 + new homes will be a danger to the community with a 2
lane collector road.
2. The lack of a fire station will make response times even longer than they are now and
unacceptable.
3. The lack of a police station will make safety an issue.
4. The lack of a traffic signal at 17th and Liberty will increase the number of traffic accidents.
5. The lack of a traffic signal at 17th and Chandler will cause accidents with the increase of
traffic.

Please reconsider the amendment for the safety of our nearby communities.

Mary Balsie
Promontory at Foothills West




Page 483
From: JN Bailey
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Please do NOT reclassify Chandler Blvd. Item #: 17, Case #: GPA-AF-1-22-6
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 4:44:07 PM


Hi,

My husband and I are native Arizonans, and have called Ahwatukee home for the past 7 years.
We currently live out in the Promontory @ Foothills West community at the end of Chandler
Blvd with our 2-year-old son, and are expecting a second boy this October. We love this
community and this area.

As someone who has driven this stretch of Chandler Blvd almost daily since 2019, I am
writing to implore you to please NOT narrow Chandler Blvd. Please do NOT reclassify it
from an Arterial to a Collector road.

Earlier this year, our toddler had an emergency and it took paramedics 18 minutes to
arrive at our house. From speaking with neighbors, I know that they have experienced
longer waits and in more serious situations. Narrowing the road, adding in many new
homes, and not expanding emergency services in the area is going to exacerbate the
situation.
There are already lines of traffic on Chandler Blvd during rush hour times. Narrowing
the road and forcing cars to block the traffic lanes is going to be a disaster.

I am very frustrated at the notion that the decision to reclassify the road is being made by
people who ultimately will not be impacted by the outcome of their decision.

Please seriously take into consideration the impact on people who currently call this area
home, and the people who these homes are being built for.

Reference: Item number 17
Case Number: GPA-AF-1-22-6

Kind Regards,

Nancy and Jason Bailey
3406 W Brookwood Ct
Phoenix AZ, 85045




Page 484
From: ROBYN BOITZ/MASKELL
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: boitzie@cox.net
Subject: Item #17, Case #GPA-AF-1-22-6
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 4:29:03 PM




Good Afternoon,



I would just like to take a moment to express my concerns if the street on Chandler is not
widened.



If this is not done it will create many safety issues/concerns for me as a resident of
Promontory at Foothills West.



During the lengthy construction process I fear access in and out of our area will be
substantially slowed or stopped. What happens if unfortunately, there is an emergency or fire
and the first responders can not get to us?



I have the same issues with adding so many new drivers to a single lane street. Again, what
happens if there is an emergency, and there is an accident on that street..... No way in or out.
Response times to us are already frighteningly long.



Most of us were told a fire station was absolutely going into the new development. Now that
appears to be put off for a later date. I fear this situation coupled with the discussion to NOT
widen the road is a recipe for a future disaster.



Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter.

Robyn Boitz-Maskell




Page 485
From: Bonnie Nied
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Item # 17 / Case # GPA-AF-1-22-6
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 2:45:38 PM


SUBJECT:
Phoenix City Planning Commission for the meeting Thursday, August 4th at 6 pm on the
Amendment to change Chandler Blvd from an Arterial (4 lane) to a Collector (2 lane) road,
from 17th to Shaughnessey (the new Upper Canyon development)



Re: Item number 17 and Case number GPA-AF-1-22

We are residents at the “Promontory at Foothills West”
3461 W. Mountain Vista Drive
Phoenix, AZ 85045

With the 1000+ additional homes due to the new Upper Canyon development- it is imperative
that the road from 17th to Shaughnessey be expanded to 4 lanes, and a police & fire station be
included in the plans if this developer gets approved.

We currently have delays in response times now for emergency services and this planned
development will just make the issue worse.
Safety is the issue and the developers of the new area should be held accountable for the road
expansion the additional traffic it will bring.

Accountability and safety should outweigh profits.

PLEASE expand the road in/out of this area!

Regards,
Homeowners: Terry & Bonnie Nied




Page 486
From: jaslowleeother@gmail.com
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Item number 17 and Case number GPA-AF-1-22-6
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 9:57:36 AM


Please consider requiring Chandler to be 4 lanes adjacent to the new Blandford development. We
cannot add 3,000 autos and not expect additional traffic and congestion.

In addition, we need an additional Loop 202 freeway on-ramp / off ramp.

Let’s continue to design our neighborhood correctly the first time, versus figuring it out at a later
date or when someone is killed in avoidable accident.

Thanks,
Lee Jaslow
3468 W Morgan Ivy Ln
Phoenix, AZ 85045
49-248-1110




Page 487
Racelle Escolar

From: Leslie Dunlop
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 3:55 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Item number 17, Case number GPA-AF-1-22-6


HelloPhoenixCityPlanningCommission,

MyfamilyandIliveinthePromontoryCommunityinAhwatukeeFoothills.We’reveryconcernedaboutthe
inconvenienceandmoreimportantly,safetyconcernswithoutanexpansionofChandlerBlvd.Thenearestfirestationis
wellover6+milesaway,andtherearenofutureplansforabuildoutofone.Theresponsetimeforemergencyvehicles
willbemuchlongeriftheroadwideningandfreewayexitarenotconsidered.

Withaddingover1500+householdsbuiltbyBlanfordHomes,itwillintroduceatonofnewtrafficandimpactthe
neighboringcommunities.Also,withthereturnofbeingonsiteattheoffices,I’mconcernedthatanypreviousstudies
werealsodonewiththatnotbeingaconsideration.

Thankyoufortakingourconcernsintoconsideration,

LeslieDunlop





Page 488
Racelle Escolar

From: David DiMassa
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 1:24 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Fwd: Item number 17 Case GPA-AF1-22-6





Hello

IhavebeenanAhwatukeeresidentsince1992andnowmywifeandIliveinahomeinthePromontorydivisioninWest
Ahwatukee,IwouldlikethePhoenixCityCounciltoknowmyopinionoftheconferencecallthatIattendedvirtuallyon
June27.Noonewasallowedtospeakduringthismeetingexceptforcouncilmembers,speakersandtworesidentsthat
hadpreapprovedquestionssubmittedinadvance,ofwhichIwasone,however,Iwasnotallowedtospeakforsome
reason.IheardonlyoneAhwatukeeresidentthatspokeonthiscall,othermembersdidnotseemtobefamiliarwith
WestAhwatukeeatall.IamverydisappointedthattheCouncilvotedonJune27toproceedwithadeveloperplanthat
impactsallWestAhwatukeeresidents.TherepresentativefromBlanfordhomesrepeatedlyreferredtoatrafficstudyhis
companyhascompletedandinconclusionheandsubsequentlysomeboardmembersdecidedtomoveaheadwitha
Cityplanto;

ClassifyChandlerBlvdto27thavefroma"arterial"toa"collector"street.What?ThenewBlanfordmassiveprojectwill
add1040singlefamilyhomes,150rentalunitsand329apartmentsaddingover3000newresidentsandawhopping
13000+newcartrips/dailybytheirownstudy,whichIamsureisconsevative.
NarrowingChandlerBlvdandincreasingbikelanesandparallelparking.What?Bikersandhikersareprimarilynon
Ahwatukeeresidentsthatarenotevencalculatedintheincreasedtraffic
OneCouncilpersonsaidincreasingtheamountoflaneswouldonlyincreasespeedingonChandlerBlvd.What?Ifthat
logicweretrue,theSMF202shouldonlybe2lanes,not4!
Thenearestfire/emergency/policestationiscurrently6milesfromPromontory.Myneighborshaveexperiencedupto
20minwaittimesforemergencyvehicles.NarrowingChandlerBlvdwillonlyincreasethistime.TheFireDept
officialstatedthatnonewstationsareplannedinourareaforatleast3Ͳ10years.
Ahwatukeepopulationis80,000+beforethenewresidentsthathavebeenaddedinthelast5years.Ourresidentspay
alargeamountofpropertytaxesandreceiveaverysmallamountofCityservices,PoliceandFIre,especiallyvs.other
Phoenixareas.AhwatukeeshouldhavejustasmuchpoliticalpowerasArcadiaandNorthPhoenix.My
oldclassmateatASUandfriendSalDeCiccioandIcertainlydidnotagreepolitically;however,Salalwaysrepresented
theresidentsofAhwatukeewell,inmyopinion.
Pleasedonot"rubberstamp"thiscursoryplanfromdeveloperBlanfordandallowourbeautifulneighborhoodsto
becomelesssafeandlessquiet.Thisisnotthe90'swhenPhoenixCityplanningwasinfluencedbybuilderswhoonly
careaboutsellingmorehouses.Whentheyleaveitisus,theresidentsthathavetogobackyearsfromnowandcorrect
theirmistakes.

Thankyouforyourtime

DavidandLorettaDiMassa
3410WestBrookwoodCourt
Phoenix,Az85045





Page 489
Racelle Escolar

From: Val DeMik
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2022 10:33 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Kyle Wellik; Stephen Whalley
Subject: Blandford Homes Upper Canyon Development, Case number GPA-AF-1-22-6



Phoenix Planning Commission,



My husband and I only considered moving into our home in Promontory at Foothills West because of the new 202 that
opened shortly after our move 3 years ago. The move from a home that we loved in Chandler was to be closer to our
granddaughter (lives in Goodyear) and greatly increase the convenience of helping raise her. It truly takes a village,
especially these days, and we are a big part of that village. We always thought Ahwatukee was beautiful but never
considered living there because of the inconvenience of living in a funnel of traffic, until the new 202 connected far West
Ahwatukee to the rest of the valley.

We are extremely distraught over the new Upper Canyon development planned between our home and 17 th Ave., our first
exit out of the neighborhood. It’s concerning enough that months and years of construction traffic will significantly hinder
our commute, but the fact that the builder may be approved to not widen the road is disheartening and
unreasonable. Many communities suffered in the fight for/against the new 202 to make Ahwatukee more accessible and
that fight will be for naught for all the homes West of 17th Ave., if the builder is not held accountable to increase the lanes
to at least 5 lanes, per original plan. In addition, other considerations for construction traffic during construction phases
should also be considered as there are legitimate health and safety concerns.

Had the entrance/exit to the new 202 been at Chandler Blvd instead of 17 th Ave., which is West of the new development,
this would be less of a concern and much less of a safety issue. Maybe the builder would prefer funding a new exit there,
though I believe that would be significantly more costly than adding lanes. The only reason I mention it is for perspective
and the severity of consequences the builder is carelessly proposing to impose on all communities West of 17 th Ave. in
the name of profit optimization. Their profit optimization significantly threatens our safety, health and livability.

Some of the health and safety concerns referenced above include fire, police and medical response times. Our gated
community that’s literally at the end of the Ahwatukee road has had many concerning characters and events during our
time here. We’ve had nefarious people caught on camera stealing packages, breaking into vehicles, racing at high
speeds through the winding neighborhood, trying to light fires near homes, and drug paraphernalia found in the
surrounding desert areas, to name a few. Due to the already long response times, no one has been held
accountable. We are thankful no one has been physically hurt.

Additionally, Promontory at Foothills West is currently considered a high-risk fire zone by most home insurers. Many
homeowner’s insurance companies refuse to insure our homes based on the expected response time of the closest fire
stations. The companies that do insure us charge a significant premium, which creates a financial hardship in addition to
safety concerns. If the insurance companies have done their risk assessment and consider this a high-risk fire
neighborhood due to extended response times as it currently stands, how can anyone in good conscience consider

Page 490
increasing that risk to the people of the communities West of 17th Ave.? Then there’s medical response times. We have
had several medical emergencies in the neighborhood. There’s been a couple very serious life-threatening emergencies
that may have turned out very poorly if response times for emergency response were lengthened.

I don’t know what the builder’s experts assessed or the reasoning behind their report ($$) but I can assure you that they
did not reasonably assess traffic flows, response times, insurability, risk, and livability for all residents West of the 17th
Ave. exit. I am willing to speak publicly as a homeowner, gather petitions, or do anything else that will legally curtail this
unreasonable, harmful, shameful plan. Please consider the people that live here before allowing corporate profit to
overrule our community by making it significantly less safe and less livable.



Sincere Regards,



Valerie DeMik

Promontory Foothills West Resident







Page 491
Racelle Escolar

From: Michael Buzinski
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 1:31 AM
To: Racelle Escolar
Cc: Council District 6 PCC; John Cochran
Subject: Public Comment - Request for review of GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Chandler Blvd Reclassification to Collector St)
Attachments: MIN171068-Ahwatukee Planning-22AUG16.pdf; Chandler Blvd Lane Reduction - Calabrea 19AUG2022.pdf


Hello Ms. Escolar,

I'm reaching out as the HOA president of one of the communities impacted by the General Plan Amendment request submitted by Blandford homes, GPA-AF-1-
22-6.
This summary of this amendment is:
Minor General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Street Classification Map designation on Chandler Boulevard from Arterial Street to Collector
Street; and 27th Avenue from Arterial Street to Local Street

Our community would like to request an opportunity to meet with the planning committee members who will be reviewing this request to express our concerns with
this request and the negative repercussions it will create for residents west of 17th Ave. We can be available in person or remote. We have no issue with Blandford
developing the former state land parcel but have concerns with their request and how it changes the previous commitments given to us by Phoenix and ADOT in
2015/2016.
Page 492


The original Chandler extension plan is documented in the "South Mountain Freeway FEIS/ROD Reevaluation #3 for Chandler Boulevard: 27th Avenue to 19th
Avenue" document found at (https://apps.azdot.gov/files/projects/south-mtn/Post-ROD/SMF-Reevaluation-3-080316.pdf [apps.azdot.gov])
This document details the city's commitment to building the road to 4 lanes plus a center turn lane, sidewalks and bike paths. From the document:




Page 493




In addition, during the August 2016 Ahwatukee Village Planning Committee meeting (see attached) the City of Phoenix Streets Transportation Department and
Kimberly-Horn representatives spoke to the committee. Specific quotes related to the development of the Chandler extension:
"Ms. Kim Carroll, from Kimberley-Horn, provided an overview of the traffic technical memorandum regarding the project. She explained that the purpose of
the memorandum was to address community concerns and evaluate before and after traffic conditions. She explained the "Level of Service" (LOS) criteria
used for evaluating traffic and indicated that both the existing Pecos Road and the proposed Chandler Road extension would have an LOS of "B" or better.
She noted that the proposal would result in improved response time for first responders in some conditions and that it had been evaluated by both the City
of Phoenix Police and Fire departments."

"Ms. Noteware commented that the proposed extension would be built to a condition designed to handle the traffic flow of an arterial roadway and that the
LOS rating would not change."

"(Ms. Noteware) clarified that the City of Phoenix owns only the north side of the roadway and that the south side would be developed when the Arizona
State Land Department sold this property. She noted that this is a typical process for road development."

"Mr. Chad Blostone asked for examples of two-lane roadways in the City of Phoenix that serve a similar amount of homes. He noted that the
proposed roadwaywouldresultinvaryingwidthsalongChandlerRoad.Ms.Notewareresponded that staff would need to research similar roadway
configurations." (NOTE:nosimilarroadwaywasidentified)

We would like to understand how this change can be supported when extensive review was performed in 2015/2016 justifying maintaining an arterial designation
to meet the original Pecos Rd Level of Service (LOS). Pecos was built as 4 lanes from 17th to 27th Ave in 2000-2001 as an arterial roadway. We also don't
understand why the 'typical process for road development' would not be followed for this development.

Finally,thesupportingargumentfromBlandfordindicatestheadditionallanesarenotneededsincethefreewayinterchangewasmovedfrom27thAveto17th
AveappearsinvalidwhenallADOTdocumentationsinceatleast2006onlyshowsthe17thAveinterchangeandthereͲevaluationdocumentdetailingthedesign
andbuildfortheChandlerExtensionwasclearlyperformedwiththeinterchangeat17thAve.Itshouldalsobenotedthatduringthecommunitypresentations
in2016,LibertyLanewasincludedinthediscussion(seep.92ofReevaluation#3forChandlerBoulevard:27thAvenueto19thAvenue).However,nodetailson
LibertywereincludedbecauseitwasoutsideofthescopeoftheprojectanditsexactalignmentandconnectiontoChandlerwasundetermined.Whilewefully
supportreclassifying27thAvetoalocalstreet,wehavenotseensufficientjustificationtoinvalidatetheextensiveanalysisperformedin2015/2016orthe
benefititwillprovidetheresidentslivinginWestAhwatukee.
The only benefit we currently see is for Blandford to save the cost of building the additional roadway and gaining added land for development.

Thanks for your help and support,
Mike Buzinski
Page 494 President - Calabrea HOA




Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Chandler Blvd Lane
Page 504

Reduction
Calabrea Residents
Agenda

X Overview
X Historical Timeline Review
X Proposal Concerns
Page 505 X Concerns with change process
X Concerns with Safety and Access
X Concerns with Emergency Response
X Concerns with ‘Quality of Life’
X Disappointment with ‘Broken promises’
X Summary
X Recommendations
Overview
X Local Residents Disagree with Local Roadway Change Proposal
X Blandford Request to Reclassify Chandler Blvd
X Request:
Minor General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Street Classification
Map designation on Chandler Boulevard from Arterial Street to Collector Street; and
27th Avenue from Arterial Street to Local Street
X Reason for Requested Change:
Page 506
To allow the development south of Chandler Boulevard.
Area Timeline - Historical
X 2001 Pecos Blvd – 17th Ave to Chandler Blvd (27th Ave)
X Pecos built as 4-lane divided roadway
X 2006 ADOT Freeway Draft – HDR SM EIS Memo
X 4 interchanges planned along East/West section: 40th St, 24th St, Desert Foothills, 17th Ave
X No plan for 27th Ave interchange since at least 2006
X 2016 Public meetings on Chandler Blvd extension
Page 507 X Jan 16, Mar 28, Aug 22 (Chris Turner-Noteware: Phoenix Street Transportation spokesperson)
X 2016 FEIS/ROD Reevaluation #3 for Chandler Boulevard published
X ‘Final’ Plan of record was Chandler extension would be 4 travel lanes, center turn lane, with bike
lanes and sidewalks on both sides
X Phoenix will build bridges, 2 lanes of travel, bike lanes and north sidewalks
X Developer of State Trust Land will build remaining roadway
X 2016 Aug Foothills Village Planning Committee Meeting (Updates on Chandler Blvd Improvement)
X Kimberly-Horn spokesman reported Chandler design would retain Pecos LOS rating of “B” or better
X Ms. Noteware commented extension would “handle the traffic flow of arterial roadway and that the
LOS would not change”
Area Timeline - Current
X 2021 Jun – Blandford wins land auction
X 2022 May – Blandford Holds Public Meeting
X Outlines plan to request Chandler be reclassified from Arterial to Collector
X Reduce number of lanes from 4 + center turn to 2 + center turn
X 2022 Jun – Ahwatukee Foothills Village Planning Committee Review
Page 508
X Reclassification request was reviewed and approved 5-3 with min quorum
(NOTE: all local board representatives voted against)
X 11 residents protested change. No residents spoke to support proposal
X 2022 Aug – City of Phoenix Planning Commission
X Reclassification request reviewed
X Multiple residents protested change (~50) with multiple speaking against during the
meeting
X Final decision postponed until September meeting
Proposal Review Concerns
X Accelerated Timeline
X First public notification was May. Initial approval granted in June before public
provided detailed traffic study
X No ‘in person’ public meetings
X No open public debate – All discussions were held in Zoom and no public concerns were
addressed
Page 509
X Insufficient Analysis Used for Justification
X Blandford is using simple traffic volume study
X No independent analysis / review (impacted residents not provided opportunity for expert
analysis)

X No analysis on why studies in 2015/2016 supporting arterial street are invalid
X Insufficient safety concern review: single entry access, emergency response, etc.
X Insufficient ‘quality of life’ review:
X Inability to maintain continuous flow during maintenance, etc.
Concerns with Reclassification
X Permanent Change
X Once Upper Canyon built, Chandler can never be widened
X Emergency Response Time
X Current response times exceed city goals
X City has future plan to build station in impact area, but no timeline exists
Page 510
X Single Entry / Exit
X A single 2-vehicle accident will eliminate ALL access to >1000 homes
(wider roadway would reduce the chance of full blockage)
X City of Phoenix failed to identify similar roadway in 2016
X Bridges built to accommodate arterial classification
Summary
X Chandler was designated currently designated as arterial roadway
X Designation maintained without 27th Ave freeway interchange
X City of Phoenix commitments for Chandler Blvd:
X 4-lane, center turn, w/ bike lanes and improved sidewalks on each side in 2016
X Bridges were built to accommodate planned lanes
Page 511
X Blandford is requesting change to plan of record with insufficient analysis
X Traffic study only – did not allow independent analysis / review
X Did not adequately address: single access concerns, emergency response, etc.
X No resident concerns directly addressed by Blandford, Village Planning
Committee or Planning Commission
Recommendations

X Delay approval to allow additional review
X NOTE: 27th Ave can be reclassified. It is agreed this roadway is low volume
X Independent Traffic Study Review
Page 512 X Provide previous traffic study from 2015 period
X Allow us to perform professional review of updated traffic study and compare to
previous study
X Require Street Transportation Department to provide analysis and justification
of why 2016 analysis is no longer valid
X Provide example of single lane access over 1 mile serving >1000 homes
Thank you for you Time!
Page 513
Racelle Escolar

From: John L.
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 5:51 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Chandler blvd reclassification


Towhomitmayconcern:

Chandlerblvdistheonlyaccessinandoutofourcommunity.Addingmoretrafficalongwithcyclistsandnotwidening
theroadcreatesasafetyhazard.
Itwillalsoincreasefirstresponderresponsetimeincaseofemergency.

BrandfordhomesknewtheneedforwideningChandlerbeforetheypurchasedtheland.Theonlyreasontheydonot
wanttowidentheroadsistoincreasetheirprofitmargin.
Moneyoversafetyisnotacceptable.

PleasesticktotheoriginalplanofwideningChandlerBoulevard.It’stheRIGHTthingtodo.PLEASEDONOTLETUS
DOWN.MakeBlandfordsticktotheoriginalplan.

Thankyou,
JohnLopez
(PromontoryatFoothillsWestresident)

SentfrommyiPhone





Page 514
Racelle Escolar

From: Connie Schneider
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 10:16 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition to Case GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Chandler Blvd Reclassification to Collector St)


I'm reaching out as a an HOA Board member of the Calabrea Community, one of the communities impacted by the
General Plan Amendment request submitted by Blandford homes, GPA-AF-1-22-6.

I am deeply opposed to this change for the following reasons:


ƒ Emergency response time
ƒ The closest fire station is too far to meet response time goals with the current conditions as reported by
the fire department. Once the new Blanford homes are built and the traffic on Chandler Blvd increases, it
will cause more delays and hinder the emergency response time further. I am very concerned about the
safety of our community as a result of delayed emergency response time.
ƒ Safety of single road access in/out
ƒ One accident can completely block the roadway. This section of Chandler Blvd. is the only way to get in
and out of our community. An accident could block our ability to get in or out of our community for hours.
This is a safety issue.
ƒ There will be construction from the Blandford homes for at least 5 years as stated by the
representative from Blandford homes. This will cause a hazard for our community for many
years as lanes will be blocked due to construction equipment, delivery trucks, etc.
ƒ Broken commitments from the City of Phoenix in 2015/16
ƒ We were promised the additional lanes by the City of Phoenix in 2015/16. Nothing has changed in the
plan from the time of that commitment that would justify breaking this commitment. I am concerned that
Blandford homes is paying/enticing someone from the City of Phoenix to make this change so that they
can benefit from the additional land they will acquire.
ƒ No community benefit from change
ƒ The requested change does not benefit the community and negatively impacts the community with more
traffic with fewer lanes to handle the traffic. The only benefit of this change is to Blandford homes as they
will be granted more land to build more homes. It doesn't make sense to me to benefit a developer over
an established community of tax payers.


Please consider my concerns and deny the requested change to reclassify Chandler Blvd to
Collector Street.

Thanks,
Connie Schneider

Address: 3110 W. Glenhaven Dr., Phoenix, AZ





Page 515
Racelle Escolar

From: Leslie Dunlop
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 9:32 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: W Chandler Blvd and Upper Canyon Community - GPA-AF1-22-6



Hello Phoenix City Planning Commission,

AslongͲtermresidentsofAhwatukeeandcurrentmembersofthePromontoryFoothillsCommunity,we
wouldrespectfullyrequestthattheplanningcommissiontakenofurtheractiononreclassifyingChandlerBlvd
andleavestreetclassificationasapproved.Requestingreclassificationdoesnotbenefitanyoftheexisting
andfuturecommunitymembersinthatarea.

WithBlanford'splantobuildover1500+homes/apartments/townhouses,thatwillgreatlyimpactthe
neighboringcommunities.ChandlerBlvdisthesingleaccessroadItakeeverydayandintheeventthereisa
roadhazardoraccident,itwillgreatlyobstructthetrafficbecausethereisnootheraccesspointbesides17th
Ave.Havingtheadditionallaneswillprovideanopportunityforemergencyvehiclestopass.I'mconcerned
aboutthedistanceofthecurrentfirestationaswellasnearbyhospitals.Theonlyroadwehaveaccesstois
ChandlerBlvd,asingleaccessroadwithonlytwolanes.Increasingthenumberofhomesandpopulation
withouttheadditionallaneswillfurtherdelayemergencyresponsetimesaswellasourabilitytocommuteto
nearbyhospitalsincaseofanemergency.Additionally,withlivingonamountain,wearemoresusceptibleto
possiblefiresandlimitseveryoneinthecommunity,includingfutureBlanfordresidents,toevacuatethe
community.TheproposedBlanfordsolutionisaddingadditionalparallelparkingandbikepaths,willonlyadd
tothefutureissueswehaveifthereisnotaroadexpansion.Itwillcreateevenfurthercongestiontoan
alreadycongestedspace.

Pleasehonorthecommitmentthatwasmadein2016tobuildoutChandlerBlvdwithfourlanes+centerlane
withbikelanesandimprovedsidewalksonbothsides.Weloveourcommunityandwanttofurtherenjoy
Ahwatukeeformanyyearstocome.

Iappreciatethetimetofurtherconsidermyrequest.

Thankyou
LeslieDunlop





Page 516
Racelle Escolar

From: Charissa Mccarron
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2022 7:48 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Darrell McCarron
Subject: Against the Current Width of Chandler Blvd in the Foothills


Hi,
IamwritingyoutoexpressmyconcernwiththecouncilplanningmeetingandtheirplansnottowidenChandler
Boulevardintothefoothillsfrom17thAve.onceBlandfordhomesbuild1500newresidents.

Ihavelivedinthefoothillsreservessince2002.OriginallybuildinginWoodsidehomesandnowlivinginCalabreatucked
intheback.Wehavewatchedthegrowthandtheincreaseoftrafficasfamilieshavegrown.

WiththisnewadditionofbasicallyanentirelynewcommunityequalingtheFoothillsReserveitisappallingthat
everyoneisglossingoverthefactthatwewillneedawiderroad.

Blandfordhomes,likemanybuilders,wanttosqueezeinasmanyhomesashumanlypossiblewithtotaldisregardof
howthetrafficwillflowduringourbusiesttimesoflife.

ClearlynooneonthecouncillivesintheFoothillsReserve.Ifanyonelivedbackheretheywouldknowwhatitislike
tryingtoleavebetween7:00amand8:30inthemorning.Wehavehikers,joggers,dogwalkers,bicyclers,andkidsat
everycornerwhilemanyschoolbuses(multiple),adultsandteensareleavingforhighschool,errands,andwork.
Residentsareinandoutthroughouttheentireday.Andthenitgetsextremelybusybetween3:30and6:30inthe
afternoonwithschoolbuses,professionals,andexercisingfolks,dogwalkers,andkidscomeouttoplay.THENplanon
doublingallofthosepeopleandtheiractivitiesifyouadded1500residentswiththenewsubdivisionbuiltbyBlandford
homes!!

Tonotwidenthisroadisillogical.

TherewillbethreeentrancestoBlandfordwhichmeansthemiddlelanewouldbetakenupbythoseturningtogo
home.Toonlyhaveonelaneonthegoingwestandonelanegoingeastnowthatmiddlelaneisaturninglaneintothe
Blandfordsubdivisionsisdangerousandunsafe—Ͳnottomentionit’sbusiesttimeswillbewhenthesunisrisinginthe
eastandthesunissettinginthewestandyouareblindedbythesunlight.Andimaginethebicyclersandrunnersand
joggersoneachside!

Wehavetogrowandevolvewithourgrowingpopulation,ournewhighwayinfrastructurearoundSouthMountain,and
thesenewbuildouts.Tonotwidenthisroadwouldbeagravemistake.

AsaresidentoftheFoothillsReservefor20yearsIamappalledthatwe’reevenhavingthisdiscussionandhavingto
buildacaseregardingit.Ifanyoneknowsit’stheresidentswhohavelivedbackhereduringthequieterdaysoftheculͲ
deͲsac.

Pleaselistentotheresidentswhohaveseenthegrowthandseenthechangeandknowthatitwillbecompletely
dangerousifyoudonotwidenChandlerBoulevard.
ͲͲ
Haveagreatday,
Charissaᑼᑿ





Page 517
Racelle Escolar

From: Jenni Harris
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2022 11:45 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Request to Recommend AGAINST GPA-AF-1-22-6


TotheCityofPhoenixPlanningCommission,

ThiscorrespondenceistoconveymysignificantconcernsregardingtherequestfromBlandfordHomestoreclassify
ChandlerBlvd(GPAͲAFͲ1Ͳ22Ͳ6).

IamahomeownerandacurrentmemberoftheBoardofDirectorsfortheHomeownersAssociationat
PromontoryFoothillsWestinAhwatukee.IrespectfullyrequestthatthePlanningCommissionrecommendAGAINSTthe
requestfortheStreetClassificationAmendmentforChandlerBlvd.

WhenBlandfordHomespurchasedthelandparcelinJune2021,theywereawareoftheclassificationofChandlerBlvd
asanArterialStreetandthatthelandpurchaseincludedtherequirementtoexpandChandlerBlvdto4travellanes,a
centerturnlane,bikelanesandsidewalkswhichweredetailedinthepublished2016FEIS/RODReevaluation#3for
ChandlerBoulevard.
(https://apps.azdot.gov/files/projects/southͲmtn/PostͲROD/SMFͲReevaluationͲ3Ͳ080316.pdf[apps.azdot.gov])

ThereclassificationdoesNOTbenefitthecommunitymembers.Therehasbeensignificantoppositiontothisproposal
fromthecommunitymembers.Thecommunitymembers'concernshaveNOTbeenaddressed.BlandfordHomesisthe
onlybeneficiaryifChandlerBlvdisreclassifiedtoaCollectorStreet.

BlandfordHomereferencesaTrafficFlowstudywhichtheysponsoredwhencitingdatathatChandlerBlvddoesnot
requireanArterialStreetstatus.ThisisNOTanindependentanalysisandshouldNOTsupersedethepreviousanalysis
thatwasperformedin2015/2016whichdetermined it appropriate to maintain Chandler Blvd as an arterial designation in
order to meet the original Pecos Rd Level of Service (Pecos was built as 4 lanes from 17th to 27th Ave in 2000-2001 as
an arterial roadway but was removed during the construction of the 202 South Mountain freeway). I ask that the Planning
Commission honor the commitment to the residents in South Ahwatukee to maintain Arterial Street access by preserving
Chandler Bloulevard's current Street Classification.

Chandler Blvd is the single access roadway to approximately 600 existing homes that are located west of the Blandford
development site. In the event of a car accident or other event that obstructs the roadway, there is no other access point.
The additional lanes would provide a wider access point and decrease the probability of an issue resulting in complete
obstruction of the roadway. This is particularly important in our current situation in which emergency response times to our
communities are above the set standards. Any obstruction of the roadway will hinder emergency services access and
exacerbate the delayed response times. Furthermore, in the event of a required evacuation (such as a fire on South
Mountain), the current single access roadway with 3 total lanes (2 travel and 1 center turn lane) will not accommodate the
increased number of people/vehicles that will have to utilize the roadway as an exit. 

It is also important to consider that some of the most significant times of traffic utilization will occur in the mornings when
parents are transporting their children to the local schools. Currently the school districts are experiencing a significant
shortage of bus drivers. As a result, the bus routes are quite lengthy. My children who attend Cerritos Elementary have a
bus pick up time of 6:38 AM for a school start time of 7:30. They are the THIRD stop on the route, meaning there are two
stops ahead of us where the children board the bus even earlier. Because of the extremely lengthy route, we have altered
our plans and I now drive my children to school each morning. With the additional 1,050 homes, 150 townhouses and 329
apartments that Blanford will be developing, there will be an increase in the number of students enrolled in these schools.
If the school district continues to experience shortages of bus drivers, there will be numerous additional families accessing
Chandler Boulevard at the same time each morning in order to transport their children to the schools. The current set up
with 1 travel lane in each direction will be particularly inadequate during this time. 


Page 518

Also, during the Ahwatukee Village Planning Committee meeting on June 27, 2022, one of the committee members
queried Blandford Homes regarding their expected build out timeline and if a 4 year timeframe would be anticipated. The
representative confirmed construction would likely not begin until early 2023 and that a 4 year build out time frame is a
reasonable estimate. Based on this information, residents can expect to deal with construction vehicles for approximately
4 years once construction begins. Maintaining the current arterial classification of Chandler Blvd and requiring Blandford
to honor the previously determined expansion of Chandler Blvd to 4 travel lanes plus 1 center turn lane, will help minimize
the impact of the construction vehicles on traffic flow during the build out. 

It is also important to note that requiring the expansion of Chandler Blvd at this time (as was previously committed), is
imperative because once the Blandford homesite is developed, there will no longer be an option to go back and complete
the expansion. If Blandford is granted this request, they will gain the additional land for their homesite development and
there will be houses built which will permanently prevent the ability to expand Chandler Blvd.

Iwouldalsoliketopointoutthattheproposedadditionoftheparallelparkingspacesandadjacentbikelanesand
pedestrianpathsaregoingtoresultinalogisticalnightmare.ThecurrentbikelanesonChandlerBlvdeastofthe
trailheadareimmediatelyadjacenttothedrivinglanesandtheparallelstreetparkingisagainstthecurb.Thisis
consistentwithotherstreetsinourcity.ThecurrentproposalfromBlandfordincludesadditionalparallelparkingalong
thenorthsideofChandlerBlvdatthetrailheadandwestofthetrailhead.However,intheirproposeddesign,thebike
lanesandparkingspaceswillbeinvertedfromwhatcurrentlyexistseastofthetrailhead.Theirdesignhastheparallel
parkingspotsadjacenttothedrivelanesandthebikelanesagainstthecurb.Inthisscenario,carswillparkin
betweenthebikelaneandthesingletravellane.Becausetheirproposalexcludesasecondtravellaneforeachdirection,
vehiclesdrivinginthetravellanewillnothaveanoptiontomoveoverintoafurtherlanewhenapproachingvehicles
thatareparking/unloading.Additionally,itwillnecessitatethatbicyclistsswitchfromridingalongthetravellanetoan
areathatisalongthecurbonthefarsideofparkedvehicles.Thiswillcreateanunsafeenvironmentandwillalsocreate
issuesrelatedtonotbeingabletoeasilyvisualizebicyclistswhentheyarerequiredtoswitchfromridingagainsttocurb
toridingadjacenttothetravellane.






Page 519


In summary, there are many issues and concerns related to the request set before the Planning Commission requesting
the reclassification of Chandler Boulevard. I urge the Planning Commision to recommend AGAINST this request and
honor the commitment that was previously made to the residents of Ahwatukee to provide Arterial Street classification
access to our community. I ask you to take notice of the many community members who have taken time to voice our
concerns regarding this very important decision. We are not asking for any changes to the agreement which was in place
and well known to Blandford when they made the purchase. We simply ask the Commission to uphold the current Arterial
Street classification as is for Chandler Blvd from 17th to 27th Ave and to require Blandford to submit a revised proposal
for the bike lanes, parking and pedestrian paths at the trailhead in order to maintain the safety of our residents. 

Thank you very much for your time and service. Please reach out to me directly if I can provide any additional information
regarding my vehement opposition to this requested reclassification.

Respectfully,

Jenni Harris









Page 520
Racelle Escolar

From: ckoury@azna.org
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2022 10:54 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Chandler Blvd Reclassification



AttentionPlanningCommission:

AshomeownersinPromontoryatFoothillsWest,werespectfullyrequestthattheplanningcommission
takenoactionandallowthestreetclassificationforChandlerBlvdtostandasis.Wedonotbelievethe
requestedreclassificationbenefitsus,thecommunitymembers,itsolelyallowsthelanddeveloper
(Blandford)toutilizemorelandfortheirownuse.ItisourunderstandingthatBlandfordwasawareof
therequirementtoexpandChandlerBlvdwhentheypurchasedtheland.

BlanfordconcludesthatthereclassificationisappropriatebecausetheaccesspointfortheSouthMount
202freewaywasalteredfrom27thAveto17thAve.However,ADOTdocumentsbackto2006showthe
planhasbeenfortheaccesspointtobeat17thAve

ThetrafficanalysisBlandfordreferencesfortheirdatapointforreclassificationisalimitedstudy
sponsoredbyBlandford,notanindependentreview.

ChandlerBlvdisthesingleaccessroadwaytoapproximately600existinghomeswhicharewestofthe
Blandforddevelopmentsite(UpperCanyon).Intheeventofcaraccidentorothereventthatobstructs
trafficflow,thereisnootheraccesspoint.Theadditionallanesprovideawideraccesspointwhich
limitstheprobabilityofacompletelyobstructiveevent.

ThedecisionaboutthereclassificationisimperativebecauseonceUpperCanyonisbuiltout,therewill
notbeanoptiontogobackandwidenChandlerBlvdsincetherewillbehomesoccupyingtheland.

EmergencyresponsetimestothesecommunitiesinwestAhwatukeearealreadydelayed.Increasingthe
numberofhomes/populationwithoutincreasingaccessibility(morelanes/widerroad)willfurther
negativelyimpactresponsetimes.

Intheeventofarequiredevacuationofthesecommunities(i.e..afireonSouthMountain),thesingle
accessroadwaywithonlythe2lanes+centerlanewillnotaccommodatethenumberofresidentsthat
willhavetoutilizetheonlyexit.

InAugust2016duringtheAhwatukeeVillagePlanningCommitteemeeting,aquestionwasposed
askingiftherewereanyothertwolaneroadwaysinthecityofPhoenixthatserveasimilaramountof
homes.ThecityofPhoenixfailedtoidentifyanyothercommunitieswithasimilarhomevolumeanda
limited,singleaccessroadwithtwolanes.

ThecityofPhoenixpreviouslycommittedtobuildingoutChandlerBlvdwith4lanes+centerlanewith
bikelanesandimprovedsidewalksonbothsides(2016).WeaskthattheCityofPhoenixhonorthat
commitment.


Page 521
Proposedadditionofparallelparkingwithbikeandpedestrianspathsarealogisticalnightmare.The
currentbikelanesonChandlerBlvd,eastofthetrailheadareadjacenttothedrivinglanesandthe
streetparkingisagainstthecurb.TheproposalfromBlandfordfortheportionofChandlerBlvdatthe
trailheadwillhavethebikelanesadjacenttothecurbandstreetparkingpositionedbetweenthebike
laneanddrivinglane.Thisisimpracticalandwillcreatemanyissueswithcarsparkingincorrectlyin
thebikelane,andcardoorsopeningintothetrafficlanewhenvehicleutilizethestreetparkinghowit
isdesignated.

Thankyouforyourconsideration,

Cheryl&NickKoury
3420WMorganIvyLane
Phoenix,AZ85045
ckoury@azna.org
602Ǧ541Ǧ3921





Page 522
3DWE




Page 523
Page 524
Page 525
Page 526
Page 527
Page 528
Racelle Escolar

From: Philip R. Wooten
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2022 5:16 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: City of Phoenix Planning Commission 9/1/22 meeting Item #10 - Application # GPA-AF-1-22-6


IamaresidentofPromontoryatFoothillsWest.MywifeandImovedintoourhomeinthissubdivisioninSeptemberof
2019,aftersellingthehomewelivedinonEquestrianTrail(ontheothersideofAhwatukeeFoothills)for30years
(1989Ͳ2019).

IwritetourgeyoutonotchangethecurrentdesignationintheGeneralPlan(“GP”)andStreetClassificationMap
(“SCM”)ofChandlerBoulevardasanarterialbetween19thand27thAvenues.Iurgeyoutorejecttheapplicationwhich
seekstodowngradeChandlerBoulevardtoacollectorstreet.Thenumberofhomesthatwillbebuiltandthehuge
increaseinpopulationbythisdevelopmentcryoutforthesensiblerequirementintheGPandSCMtoremain
unchanged.Rejectingthisapplicationwillnotharmthebusinessinterestsorexpectationsofthedeveloperofthisnew
subdivisionbecausethedeveloperboughttheState’spropertywithfullknowledgeandplainnoticeofthelegal
requirementtoexpandChandlerBoulevardtotherequiredsize(fivelanestotal,twolaneseachwayandacenterturn
lane)whichhasbeenapublicrecordforyears.RequiringthedevelopertomaketherequiredimprovementstoChandler
Boulevardisbothfairandjust.Allowingthedevelopertoavoidsuchimprovementcostsenriches,andgivesawindfallto
thedeveloper,attheexpenseofthesurroundingneighborhoods.SuchagifttothedeveloperbytheCityiscompletely
unwarranted.Andifthedevelopersucceedsingettingthisapplicationapproved,thenthispartofAhwatukeeFoothills
willprobablyberidiculed,asAhwatukeewasformanyyears,astheworld’slargestculͲdeͲsac.

Inaddition,proposeddowngradeofChandlerBoulevardtoacollectorstreetwithoutsolvingthelongͲstandingparking
problemforthetrailheadisarecipefordisaster.Indeed,doingsoissuretoexposetheCity(anditstaxpayers,suchas
yourstruly)toliabilityforthosewhoareundoubtedlygoingtobeinjuredbytheunsafeconditionsthatwillbecreatedif
theapplicationisapproved.

Pleaserejecttheapplication.Thankyou.

PhilipR.Wooten
15922S34thDr
Phoenix,Arizona85045
Tel:602Ͳ809Ͳ4203

Thiscommunicationisconfidentialandisintendedonlyfortheuseoftheindividualorentitynamedabove.Ifyouhave
receivedthiscommunicationinerror,pleaseimmediatelydestroyitandnotifythesenderbyreplyeͲmailorby
telephone.






Page 529
Racelle Escolar

From: Simon Dunlop
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2022 6:59 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: W Chandler Blvd and Upper Canyon Community - GPA-AF1-22-6


PhoenixCityPlanningCommission,

AsacurrentmemberofthePromontoryFoothillsCommunityandlongͲtermresidentofAhwatukeeitisofgreat
importancethatthePlanningCommissiontakenoactionregardingtheproposedChandlerBlvdreclassificationand
honortheoriginalstreetclassification.BlandfordHomeswasfullyawareoftherequirementtoexpandChandlerBlvd
andTheCityofPhoenixcommittedtobuildingoutthestreetin2016.Inthesameyear(2016)followinguponaquestion
askedattheAhwatukeeVillageplanningCommittee,theCityofPhoenixwereunabletoidentifyanycommunitieswitha
similarnumberofhomeswithalimited,singleaccessroadwithtwolanes.Thecommittedexpansionwastoinclude4
lanesplusacenterlaneaswellasbicyclelanesandimprovedsidewalksonbothsidesofChandlerBlvd.

Therequestedreclassificationinnowaybenefitsthecurrentmembersofthesurroundingcommunity,norwillitbenefit
thenewcommunitymemberswhopurchasehomesinUpperCanyon.BlandfordHomesarethesingularbeneficiaryof
theadditionallandavailabletothemtousefortheirownpurposeandprofit.

Regardingtrafficthereareseveralconcerns.Asyouareaware,ChandlerBlvdisasingleaccessroadtoaround600
homesfurtherwestoftheBlandforddevelopmentsite.Ifanyevent,suchasavehicleaccident,weretooccuronthis
stretchofroadtherearenootheraccesspointsforhomeownerstoreachtheirdestination.Therequiredadditional
laneswouldallowbettertrafficflowandpreventacompletebottleneck/shutdownsituation.Inaddition,current
emergencyresponsetimestoourcommunitiesarealreadydelayed.WithBlandfordHomes'proposedbuildofover1500
dwellings,includinghomes,apartments,andtownhouses,withouthonoringtheoriginalrequirementtoaddlanestothe
street,thoseemergencyresponsetimeswillundoubtedlybenegativelyimpacted.Inthereversedirectionthesame
argumentcanbemade.Iftherewasarequiredevacuationofourcommunitiesheadingeast,thesingleaccessroadwith
only2lanesplusacenterlanewillnotaccommodatethenumberofresidentsthatwillneedtousethatexit.

Inadditiontothetrafficconcernsregardingthelanes,theBlandfordHomesproposedpedestrianpaths,bicyclelanes
andparallelparkingatthetrailheadareimpracticalandwillincreasecongestion,confusion,andpotentialforaccidents
inasmall,butimportantaccessareaofChandlerBlvd.

BlandfordHomeshaveperformedatrafficanalysisthatisreferencedfortheirdatapointsforreclassification.However,
thisanalysiswasnotperformedbyanindependentreview,insteadwassponsoredbyBlandfordHomes.

Weaskthattheoriginallycommittedtoexpansionof4lanesplusacenterlaneaswellasbicyclelanesandimproved
sidewalksonbothsidesofChandlerBlvdbehonoredsotheresidentsoftheexistingcommunitiesaswellasthenew
residentstocomecanenjoylivinginAhwatukeeinasafeandhappyenvironment.



Thankyouforyourconsideration,
SimonDunlop





Page 530
Racelle Escolar

From: Todd Hammel
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2022 11:34 AM
To: Racelle Escolar; Council District 6 PCC
Cc: John Cochran; Michael Buzinski; Alisa Gooding; Pramod Patel; Todd Hammel
Subject: Public Comment - Todd Hammel, Resident - Summary, Concerns and Recommendations of GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Chandler Blvd Reclassification to
Collector St)
Attachments: Todd Hammel Summary, Concerns and Recommendations (GPA-AF-1-22-6).pdf


ToPlanningCommission,
Re:GPAͲAFͲ1Ͳ22Ͳ6(ChandlerBlvdReclassificationtoCollectorSt)
From:ToddHammel,ResidentofCalabrea

ThankyoufortheopportunitytocontinuetoexpressmyselfasacitizenandresidentofCalabreaconcerningtheGPAͲAFͲ1Ͳ22Ͳ6(ChandlerBlvdReclassification
toCollectorSt).

IdidhavetheopportunitytojoinandspeakbrieflyonmyconcernsregardingthisamendmentputforthbyBrandford.
Page 531 
Although,I'msureyou'regettingfeedbackfromtheHOA's,I'msendingyouoneasaresidenttofurtherexpressmyconcernswhichareheavilyindexedtowards
FireandEMTresponsetimes.

Myreferencepointisin2019,inFortCollinsColorado,IsufferedamassiveheartattackandthefastresponsetimebytheEMTsavedmylife!Iamconcerned
thatthisproposalbyBrandfordwouldsignificantlycompromiseourresponsetimes.

Pleasefindmysummarypointswhichareprobablyredundantbutnevertheless,Iwantedtoexpressmyselfinasuccinctmanner.

Onethingthatstruckmeatthelastmeetingwasthathavingapictureofthecommunitieswestofthesubjectareaisquiteillustrativeofourconcernsand
especiallywhenyoumapthetimefromourcurrentEMT/Firetothefurthesthouseaffected.Thisproposal;byBlanfordwilllikelyworsenthesituation
especiallyduringpeakrushhourandorevenworseanaccidentinterfereswiththeemergencyvehiclesmakingtheirwaytothescene.

Again,Iappreciatetheopportunitytospeakoutandrespectyourprocess.

BestRegards,

ToddHammel
3043WBriarwoodTerrace
Phoenix







Page 532



















Page 533
Racelle Escolar

From: Jalon Johnson
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 7:32 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Case GPA-AF-122-6



My name is Jalon Johnson. My resident is 16904 31st lane So. I am sending this email because I am
against the roads not being widen in our community. This issue not being addressed will cause lot of
safety issues on slow time responses, harm to the bikers and major traffic jams. We were promised
that these issues would be addressed back in 2016 by the city and we currently are still fighting to get
it resolved. The new Blandford will benefit from the 5 lane arterial road as well as all the of the
communities west of their area. I am requesting to be speak on at the hearing and would like for my
time to be given Mike Buzinski.
Thank you





Page 534
Racelle Escolar

From: Michael Blue
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 5:19 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Opposing the Proposed GPA-AF-1-22-6
Attachments: Chandler Blvd Lane Reduction - Calabrea 19AUG2022.pdf; Phoenix Planning Commission Meeting
01SEP2022 - 220901006.pdf; MIN171068-Ahwatukee Planning-22AUG16.pdf


I,MichaelBlueresidentofAhwatukee,aminoppositiontotheproposedGPAͲAFͲ1Ͳ22Ͳ6.

BelowisahistoryofhowtheCityofPhoenixhadpromisedtohavetheFutureDeveloperexpandtheroadwayattheir
expensepertheexampleprovidedbytheCityofPhoeniximagebelow.

ChandlerBlvdLaneReductionͲCalabrea19AUG2022(attached)

x ShorthistoryoftheFreewayandChandlerBlvdextensiondevelopment

SouthMountainFreewayFEIS/RODReevaluation#3forChandlerBoulevard:27thAvenueto19thAvenue

x Documentfoundat(https://apps.azdot.gov/files/projects/southͲmtn/PostͲROD/SMFͲReevaluationͲ3Ͳ
080316.pdf[apps.azdot.gov])IncludesmultiplereferencesthatlongtermprojectplanistobuildoutChandleras
4laneswithacenterturnlane,bikelanesandsidewalks

MIN171068ͲAhwatukeePlanningͲ22AUG16(attached)

x MinutesfromAhwatukeeVillagePlanningcommitteefromAugust2016whenextensionwasreviewed.
x BothKimberlyͲHornrepresentativeandPhoenixStreetDepartmentrepresentativesconfirmedstreetwouldbe
builtto4lanestomaintainPecoslevelofservice(LOSB)










Page 535


To help protect y ou r priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Forte Ho mes






Michael Blue
Forté Homes
602-541-8633 Direct
michael.blue@fortehomes.com
https://fortehomes.com[fortehomes.com]

www.linkedin.com/in/michael-blue-38433515[linkedin.com]



To help protect y our priv acy ,
Micro so ft Office prev ented
auto matic downlo ad o f this
picture from the Internet.
width=




Virus-free.www.avast.com [avast.com]
[avast.com] 










Page 536
From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Public Comment - Request for review of GPA-AF. 1-22-6 (Chandler Blvd Reclassification to
Collector St)



From:MonaV
Sent:Monday,August29,20227:55AM
To:CouncilDistrict6PCC;PDDPlanningCommission
Subject:PublicCommentͲRequestforreviewofGPAͲAF.1Ͳ22Ͳ6(ChandlerBlvdReclassificationtoCollectorSt)

ToWhomitmayconcern,

IwouldliketobringattentionoftheconcernsthatIhavewiththeproposedGeneralPlanAmendmentrequestsubmittedby
Blandfordhomes,GPAͲAFͲ1Ͳ22Ͳ6.IunderstandtherightofBlandfordHomestodevelopthelandtheypurchasedbutIdohave
multipleconcernswiththedevelopmentasithasbeenproposed.

MyspecificconcernswillbeoutlinedbelowbutingeneralIamconcernedthattheimpacttothe
communitieseastandwestalongtheChandlerBlvdwillsuffer.

ChandlerBlvdistheprimaryaccesstoshoppingandservicesatChandlerBlvdandDesertFoothillsPkwyforhomeswestandnorth
ofDesertFoothillsPkwyandtoalesserextentserviceseastonChandlerBlvdandRayRoadallthewaytoInterstate10.

Concerns;
WhiletheCanyonReservedevelopmentwhichconsistsof1050singlefamilyunitszonedR1Ͳ8(aswellas150buildtorentand329
multiͲfamilyunits),therearenonewamenitiestosupportthis"smallcity"sizeddevelopment.Specificconcernsinclude:
AmendingtheGeneralPlan(GPAͲAFͲ1Ͳ22Ͳ6)benefitsthedeveloper,butthischangedoesnot
benefitthecityortheexistingcommunityandlikelyharmsthecommunityinthelongrun.
CityEmergencyServicecoveragewillbesignificantlyreducedwith1500+newhousingunitsintheareawithoutincreasedresources
orlocations.ThenearestFireDepartmentlocationisneartheChandlerBlvdandDesertFoothillsPkwyintersectionmorethan3
milesawayfromtheproposeddevelopmentandhasasingleengineandsingleambulance.Housingdensityoftheproposed
developmentismuchhigherthanmostofthecurrentdevelopmentinAhwatukeeFoothillsVillagePlanningCommittee(AFVPC)area
ofresponsibility.Thisisinconsistentwiththecurrentmixofsmallerlot,traditionallotandlargelothomesinthearea.Anincrease
of13704dailytrips,2200ofwhicharemorningandeveningcommuterslikelyusingSRͲ202resultinginover11000localtripsdaily
thatrelyalmostexclusivelyonChandlerBlvdtoaccessshoppingandservicesatChandlerBlvdandDesertFoothillsPkwy.
Additionally,ChandlerBlvdisheavilyreliedupontoaccessshoppingandservicesonChandlerBlvdandRayRd.(Thereisnoaccessto
ChandlerBlvdfromtheSRͲ202orviceversaatIͲ10).This44%increaseintrafficnoiseandCOͲemissionswillnegativelyimpactall
residentslivingalongtheChandlerBlvdandRayRoadcorridors.
This44%increaseintraffic,noiseandCO2emissionsresultingfromlackoflocalshoppingor
servicesoptionsinthis"smallcity"isinconsistentwiththeCityofPhoenixGeneralPlan's
commitmenttoSustainabilitywhich"includesthe
creationofsafe,clean,sustainableneighborhoodsfreeofpollution"aswellastheCityPlan'scommitmenttoLivabilityand
Efficiency.

IpersonallyhavebeenextremelystressedwithanxietybeingIhaveafamilyandpetsandworryiftherewasanemergencysuchasa
firethattherewillbesuchadelayespeciallyifthere’ssometypeofaccidentforthefiretrucktogettomyfamily.

Thisisanightmare.

Respectfully,

MonaVise
ͲͲ
HaveaBeautifulDay!


Page 537
Racelle Escolar

From: verdayne johnson
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 3:22 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Ahwatukee Foothills City Planning


HimynameisVerdayneJohnsonandIamaresidentintheCalabreacommunity1690831stlaneSo.Myvoteistotally
againstthestreetsnotbeingwidenintobiggerlanes.Itsgreatlyaffectourpublicsafetyresponsetimeanddoesn'tgive
anybenefitstocommunitieswestoftheBlandfordortheircommunityaswell.Backin2016wewerepromisedbythe
cityfortheroadstobeturnedinto5arterialsroadandit'snow7yearslaterandwerestillfightingonthesameissues.I
amaskingtospeakattheishearingandIwouldlikemytimegiventoMikeBuzinski.Thankyou

SentfrommyTͲMobile5GDevice
GetOutlookforAndroid[aka.ms]





Page 538
Racelle Escolar

From: danbriggs@cox.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 1:55 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Application #: GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Continued from August 4, 2022)


 
DearPhoenixPlanningCommissionRegards:

The case # is: Application #: GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Continued from August 4, 2022)


ThisletterisinoppositiontoBlandford'sproposaltochangeChandlerBlvdbetween19thAveand29thAvefroma4
lanesto2lanes.

IhaveavestedinterestasalotownerinCalabreawhereIwillbuildmyfuturehome.

Thischangemakesnosense.Eventuallytherewillbeovera1000homesWestofthisstreet.
Oneaccidentcanpotentiallycloseallaccessinoroutofthisarea.Orattheveryleastcauseunreasonabledelaysforany
firstresponders.

Originalplanshad4lanesassupportedbytrafficflowstudies.Alsoincludedinoriginalplanswerebikelanes
andpedestrianwalkways.Theseaddvaluetothecommunityasadditionalamenitites..

Itisunreasonableandunsafetonowlimitthisstreettojust2lanes.

Sincerely
DanielBriggs
3203WCottonwoodLn.,Phoenix,AZ85045





Page 539
Racelle Escolar

From: Galen Schliem
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 12:54 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Extension at Foothills Reserve - Blanford Homes


DearPlanningCommission(ccDistrict6),

We'vebeenthroughalotasacommunityinthelast7orsoyears...establishingourrightswithADOTduringfreeway
construction,workingwithstateandlocaltostartChandlerExtension,andworkingtofendoffcrazyredirectionofthe
PHXsoutherndepartureflightpaths.

Afewthingsthatwerepromisedusbystateandlocal:

1.TheChandlerExtensionwouldbecompletedtofourlanes,butthefuturedeveloperwouldbeonthehooktofinish.
2.TheChandlerExtensionwouldsomedayhavelandscapingmaintainedbytheCity...justlikeotherCityroads.(now
thereisnomiddleislandorlandscapingofanykind).
3.Thefreeway"soundwall"onthe202forthesamelotoflandwouldbefinished,butbyafuturedeveloper.

ImetwithADOT,C202P,City,andDistrict6multipletimes.NowIhearthatthenewdevelopermightsimplybeableto
optoutofexpandingChandlerandbuildingthesoundwall??

Thisisunacceptabletomeasaresidentandtaxpayer.

Pleaseholdprofitablecompaniestoaccount.It'sgoodthatthey'rebuildingandcontributingtooureconomy,but
promisesneedtobekept.

Thanks!

ͲͲ
GalenSchliem
FoothillsReserveHOA
818.625.3717





Page 540
Racelle Escolar

From: Gary Darling
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 10:39 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Public Health and Safety Concerns


ToFoothillsReservePublicTrustees:

Overthelastfewmonths,ithasbeenbroughttoourattentionthattheDeveloper,BlandfordHomes,isattemptingto
backoutofmorethanadecadeofpromisesmadetoourcommunitybytheCityofPhoenixfortheexpansionof
ChandlerBlvdto4lanesbetween19thAveand27thAve
.
Forthe100'soffamiliesthatlivewestof27thAve,ChandlerBlvdisouronlywaytoexitourhomesandneighborhoods.
Itisalsotheonlyroadintoourareaforemergencyvehicles.Havingonelaneinandonelaneoutpresentsahugesafety
risktoallresidentsinourneighborhoods.Responsetimewouldbecompromisedwithanyundotrafficcongestion,
whethernormaltrafficorcausedbyanaccident.ItisalreadylongenoughtoreachthenearestHospital,don'taddto
thisdistanceandtraveltimebyreducingthenumberoflanesinandoutofourneighborhoods.Inanemergency,every
secondcounts!!
.
TheonlyreasonfortheproposedchangebyBlandfordispuregreed!Theywanttobeabletoaddmorehomestotheir
developmentbytakingawayfromChandlerBlvd.
PleaseadheretothepromisetoexpandChandlerBlvd,notbeswayedbytheDeveloperBlandfordandtheirquestfor
morelotstosellandprofitfrom!

Sincerely,

Gary&CheriDarling
16609S32ndLn
Phoenix,AZ85045
602Ͳ909Ͳ7725





Page 541
Subject: FW: Safety Question for new Subdivision as you "plan it out"



From:LawrenceKoenen
Sent:Tuesday,August30,20222:38PM
To:NayeliSanchezLuna;AngieHoldsworth
Cc:CouncilDistrict6PCC;MayorGallego;MitziEpstein
;PaulMaryniak;SteveWhalley;
jharris@atsu.edu
Subject:FW:SafetyQuestionfornewSubdivisionasyou"planitout"

DearNayeli,

Iapologizefornotbeingabletosendsoonerbuthopefullythiswillstilldrawmoreattentionthanmylastnote.

Irespectfullyrequestthattheplanningcommissiontakenoactionandallowthestreetclassificationinthisareastandas
is.ThisrequestedreclassificationdoesNOTbenefitthecommunityandonlyallowsthelanddevelopers(Blandfordand
D. R.Horton)utilizationofmorelandfortheirownuse.

Thedeveloper(Blanford)wasorshouldhavebeenawareoftherequirementsforChandlerBlvd.whentheypurchased
theland.WhilethedevelopersuggeststhischangeisacceptableduetothechangestoSouthMountainFreeway(orthe
“202”),documentsindicatethatasfarbackas2006whenthisagreementandspecificationwasmadetheplanwasno
differentthanusing17thStreetastheaccesspoint.

Additionally,trafficanalysisBlanfordreferencefortheirdatapointforthisreclassificationisalimitedstudysponsored
byBlanfordandnotanindependentreview.ChandlerBlvd.isalreadyasingleaccessroadwaytoapproximately600
existinghomeswhicharewetoftheBlanforddevelopment(intransparencyoneofthoseresidentsincludesmyself).We
havealreadyhadanumberoftimeswhenthisentireStreethasbeenblockedcreatingasafetyissue.Reducingthe
numberofintendedlanesalmostensureswewillhaverepeatsonthisroad.Thedecisiontoreclassifyisoftheutmost
concern.Oncethehomeshavebeenconstructed,therewillbenooptiontowidenChandler.

ConsiderthatouremergencyresponsetimesarealreadydelayedinwestAhwatukee.Increasingthenumberofhomes
andpopulationwithoutincreasingaccessibility,commercialaccessandmostimportantlyemergencyserviceswillresult
ingreatertimetorespond.Morelanesallowforagreaterchancethatshouldthoseservicesberequiredintimeof
need,itwouldallowtobeaccommodated.

Iwouldstress,duringthepriorAhwatukeeVillagePlanningCommitteemeetingaquestionwasraisedonifanyother
locationinPhoenixhadanareaofsimilarnumberofhomeswithacommontwolanehighway,NORESPONSEwas
provided.NoresponsewasprovidedeitheronthequestionofwhereinPhoenixdoesanothernumberofhomes
plannedorinexistencethatarethisfarfromfireprotection(alsoaspersonworkingforalargeP&Cinsurer,Iwouldalso
askwhereinPhoenixdoyouhaveorplantohaveasimilarnumberofhomeswiththeabsoluteWORSTISOratingor
ratingforfireprotectioninthemetroarea).

WhileIhavebeentoldbynewssources,about4yearsagotheplantobuildthefirestationthatwouldresolvesome
issueshaddisappearedfromtheplans(mycouncilpersonevenmentionedafewmonthsagoitwasstillinthe
plans).So,notsurehowplanningisdone,butitismakingmeabitnervousaboutpriorities.

Therefore,Iamaskingthecityplanningcommissiontohonorthecommitmentforthelargerroad,foroursafety,the
safelyofthenewresidentsandforthehonorofthecity.

Page 542

IwouldaskthattheapproachtoparkingforSouthMountainalsoberevisited.Iunderstandthatspotsthatdidn’texist
fortheparkarebeinglostduetothedevelopment.Puttingthosefolksinanawkwardlydesignedsetofspacesagainon
aroadwheretrafficwillincreaseseemsdangerous.Considerusingcityland(nowprotectedbyabrandnewcityfence
beexpandedandremovethetrafficwherehikers,familiesandsightseersareentering.Yourlastseendesignforthis
wouldappeardangerouswithdoorsopeningupintobothbikeanddrivinglanes.Pleaseconsiderthefolkslivinghere
andnotjusthowmanyhouseswecanfitintoasmallspace.

Sincerely,
LarryKoenen

Beginforwardedmessage:

From:NayeliSanchezLuna
Date:June9,2022at10:47:32AMMST
To:LawrenceKoenen,AngieHoldsworth

Cc:CouncilDistrict6PCC,MayorGallego,
SeanBowie,MitziEpstein,PaulMaryniak

Subject:RE:SafetyQuestionfornewSubdivisionasyou"planitout"



Good morning Lawrence, 



Thank you for your correspondence. Your concerns have been taken into account and will
be forwarded to the developer. 



Thank you, 

Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Planner II* Village 


Planning and Development Department 

Long Range Planning Division 

200 West Washington Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85003

nayeli.sanchez.luna@phoenix.gov



Page 543
Racelle Escolar

From: JN Bailey
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 8:37 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Please do NOT reclassify Chandler Blvd. Item #: 10, Case #: GPA-AF-1-22-6


Hi,

IhadpreviouslyemailedonAugust2nd,2022priortodiscussionofthisitembeingpostponed.Iwantedtoreachoutto
againreiteratethatIamstillinoppositiontothereclassificationofChandlerBlvd,fortheaddedreasonbelow.

PriortotheChandlerBlvdextensionand202expansion,thecommunitiesatthewestendofAhwatukeewereonly
accessibleviaPecosRoad.

Theold6,170'straightstretchofPecosRoadbetween17thAveand27thAveconsistedoftwodesignatedtravellanesin
eachdirection.Thelast1,250'stretchofthetwowestboundlanesmergedintoone.

Thenew6,280'curvedstretchofChandlerBlvdextension,from19thAvetoShaughnesseyRd,currentlyconsistsofone
travellaneineachdirectionandoneturnlane.

MyhusbandandIhavelivedinAhwatukeeforthepast7years,andhavebeencommutingalmostdailyontheChandler
Blvdextensionforthelast3.Wehaveexperiencedcongestionandwitnesseddangerouspassesonthisstretchthe
entiretimewehavelivedhere.WhencomparingthenumbersbelowsideͲbyͲside,Idonotbelievethatreclassificationis
beneficialtoourgrowingcommunity.

PreviousPecosRoad
4,920':FourTravelLanes
1,250':ThreeTravelLanes

ChandlerBlvdifitisReclassified(BlandfordHomeProposal)
6,280':TwoTravelLanes
+Over1,000Homes
+13,000NewCarTripsDaily

Reference:Itemnumber10
CaseNumber:GPAͲAFͲ1Ͳ22Ͳ6

KindRegards,

NancyandJasonBailey
3406WBrookwoodCt
PhoenixAZ,85045







Page 544
Racelle Escolar

From: pramod.patel@att.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 10:02 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Continued from August 4, 2022)



AsalongtimeresidentofAhwatukee(28+years)IwouldliketonotemyobjectiontoapplicationGPAͲAFͲ1Ͳ22Ͳ6to
retainthestreetbetweenChandlerBoulevardapproximatelybetweenthe19thand27thAvenuealignmentsatit’s
current4lanes.

Lackinganearbyfirestationwearealreadyexposedtotheriskofdelayedmedicalassistance(andfireservicesupport)
thatwillonlybemadeworsewiththeincreaseintrafficoncetheBlanfordhomesarebuilt.ExpandingChandlerBlvdas
originallypromisedbythecitywillmaketherouteforemergencyspotsaferandmorereliable.

PramodPatel





Page 545
Racelle Escolar

From: R Viswanath
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 9:36 PM
To: Racelle Escolar
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Public Comment - Request for review of GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Chandler Blvd Reclassification to Collector
St)


Dear Ms. Escolar,



I'm reaching out as a resident of the Calabrea community which is impacted by the General Plan Amendment request
submitted by Blandford homes, GPA-AF-1-22-6. 



Minor General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Street Classification Map designation on Chandler Boulevard
from Arterial Street to Collector Street; and 27th Avenue from Arterial Street to Local Street.



I have been a resident in this community since 2008. Prior to 2016, we had unfettered access along 4 lanes ( divided) on
Pecos road to get in and out of the community. Since then, we were restricted to a two lane roadway with a turn lane in
the middle for a little over a mile on Chandler blvd from 27th ave to 17th ave. The long term plan promised to widen this to
two lanes in each direction, upon sale and future development of the land currently owned by Blanford homes.



My understanding is that the additional lanes is being debated. I am voting against the reclassification and in favor of
expanding this segment of Chandler Blvd to a 4 lane roadway to restore the original Pecos road LOS, given the additional
traffic from 1500 new homes and residents. The current roadway is severely restrictive, will be unable to sustain the
additional traffic and god forbid, if there was an accident in this segment on Chandler Blvd, the residents or first
responders would have no access to get to the communities west of 27th ave.



WewouldliketheCitytoholdBlanfordtotheoriginalpromiseofrestoringa4laneroadwayandtoprioritizethebeauty
andfunctionalityofthenewcommunitytheyarebuildingovershorttermprofits.



Thanksforyoursupport.



RamViswanath

Residentandtaxpayer,Calabrea



Page 546
Racelle Escolar

From: Jeff Molinar
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 4:36 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Comment re Application #: GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Continued from August 4, 2022)


WeareresidentsofCalabreaandwritetoexpressourstrongoppositiontotheaboveͲreferencedapplication.As
explainedbymanymembersofourcommunity,theproposedmeasurenotonlycontradictsobligationsand
commitmentspreviouslymadebytheCityofPhoenixandADOT,butalsocreatesundueriskstothehealthandsafetyof
ourneighborhood.Thereappearstobenoreasonabledisputethattheproposalwouldreducetheresponsetimeof
providersofemergencyservicesandthreatenthesafetyofresidentsbyriskingcompleteblockagesoftrafficinandout
ofthearea.Nobenefittotheresidentshasbeenshown,andBlandfordseemstobeconjuringapretextualjustification
sothatitsimplymaysavemoney.Thatisunacceptableandcontrarytothepublicinterest.

TaraandJeffMolinar





Page 547
Racelle Escolar

From: Alexis Matias
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 1:02 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Extension Widening


Towhomitmayconcern,

I’mwritingthisemailtovoicemyconcerninregardstotheproposedchangetotheoriginalplanofthewideningofthe
ChandlerExtension.Notwideningtheextensionwillnegativelyimpactourcommunitybyincreasingtrafficconsequently
impactinghomevalues.
ADOTchangedtheoriginalplanofthehighwayandthathassignificantlyimpactedourcommunity.Pleasedon’tallow
Blandfordstodothesamewiththisproject.Iftheywanttobuildtheirhousesnexttoourcommunitytheyshouldfollow
theoriginalproposedplan.

Thankyou
AlexisMatias
ConcernResidentofFoothillsReserve


SentfrommyiPhone





Page 548
Racelle Escolar

From: Andrew Abraham
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 12:38 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Deaths waiting to happen due to the Blandford Community



Theaboveheadlineispurposelyintendedtograbyourattention.

ThoseofusthatliveintheFoothillsReservecommunity(aswellasthoseinthePromontoryandCalabrea
subdivisions)alreadyhavemajortrafficissues.Itshouldnotbeasurprisethatweareperplexedwithaplan
thatcontemplatestheabsenceofawidenedroadattheChandlerBoulevardextensionandShaughnessy
Road.

Infact,weneedthecitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwo
lanesineachdirectionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Adding1000Ͳishnewhomeswithoutwideningtheroadwithonlyexacerbateanalreadystressedsituation.For
instance,thereisnofirestationanywherenearus…andifthereareaccidentsattheChandler Boulevard
extension and ShaughnessyRoad, residents would be trapped from getting out of our communities
(Foothills Reserve, Promentory and Calabrea). That has happened before!

I am firmly against creating 1000+ new homes without widening the streets AS WAS CONTEMPLATED in
2015/2016

Thank you for your consideration,



Andrew Abraham (resident in the Foothills Reserve and current Board Member) 



AndrewAbraham
480Ͳ687Ͳ2342





Page 549
Racelle Escolar

From: A S
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 11:36 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition to Branford Homes project - safety issues




Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is immediately adjacent to the west of the
new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave
the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and
the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane. The current one-lane extension has
already created safety issues when it was shut down for a South Mountain helicopter rescue. These
issues will worsen with another development yet no traffic adjustment. Residents and most importantly,
emergency services need access.

Also, there is no current plan for traffic signals at Chandler and 17th, not the “back way” that will be
opened up via 17th and Liberty Lane. Traffic off the 202 has increased speed in the area and there have
been more accidents and near-misses. More homes will increase the risk, so why are no lights planned?

Regards,
Ann Sweeney
2914 W Sliver Fox Way, 85045





Page 550
Racelle Escolar

From: Anthony Ventriere
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:34 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Foothills Reserve - Blandford Homes Project


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a past Vice President of the board and current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills
Reserve is located north and south of Shaughnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new
Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the
Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the
stop sign at Shaughnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have
lived with broken promises by the city for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 2013. Twenty years ago,
the City’s master plan included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park
North of the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items have been completed
or even discussed. Now, with the planned addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in
the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City of Phoenix to stick to its plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension
as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Thank you,

Anthony Ventriere
2711 W. Cottonwood Lane
Phoenix
480-526-1174





Page 551
Racelle Escolar

From: Becky Ghena
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 7:58 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Application#: GPA-AF-1-22-6


Idonotsupportthis.Ihaveserioussafetyconcernswithasingleroad.
1.PromisesnotbeingkeptͲrefertoMIN171068ͲAhwatukeePlanning22ͲAug16confirmedthattheroadwouldbebuilt
outto4lanes1.Ifroadisn’texpanded,oneaccidentcouldblockroadwayandcauseMAJORbackups2.Ifwehavea
naturaldisaster(fire/flood)andallresidentsneedtoevacuateͲwewon’tgetoutintimeͲnotenoughroadspace3.
Singleroadlimitsemergencyresponsetime4.SouthMountainhikersalreadyparkalongroadwayandcreate
congestionandsafetyissuesThankyouGhenas
3043WWindsongDr
SentfrommyiPhone





Page 552
Racelle Escolar

From: Breck Parkinson
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 11:52 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Oppose Blandford homes request to modify Chandler Blvd


Planning Committee Members,

I am a resident of the Foothills Reserve Community that is located just west of the new Blandford Homes Project. I am
writing to oppose to the request that Blandford homes has put forth to modify the original plan of Chandler Blvd between
17th Ave and W Shaughnessey Rd. Please hold to the original plan for Chandler Blvd which is two lanes of traffic in each
direction plus a turn lane, bicycle lanes and sidewalks. With the addition of over 1000 new homes in the Blandford project
it will create added traffic congestion and negatively impact emergency response times. I also request the city to revisit
the plan to include a fire station near 19th Ave and add traffic signals at 17th Ave and Chandler Blvd, and Liberty Lane
and 17th Ave.

Thank you for your consideration,
Breck Parkinson
480-213-5783





Page 553
Racelle Escolar

From: carl osborne
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 12:31 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Chandler extension


Theyneedtowidentheroadtheycan'tstayasasinglelaneeachwayBlanfordknewthisgoingintoitandthey'dbetter
stickbehinddoingit

CarlOsborne





Page 554
Racelle Escolar

From: Chris Rosewell
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 8:38 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Blvd Extension 27th Ave & 17th ave


TotheCityofPhoenixPlanningCommission&OurCityCouncilRepresentativeMr.Dicccio,
IamaresidentoftheFoothillsReserveHOAandamwritingtoyouaboutmyconcernregardingtheDeveloper/
BlanfordHomesproposaltomodifytheformerplanfortheChandlerBlvdExtension.
IthadbeentheintentofPhoenixcityplanningtoensurethesafetyofourcommunitybymaintainingahistoricalvision
offourlanes,acenterturnlane,andbicyclelanesinthecompletedChandlerextension.
ItseemedfrugaltoomittheseimprovementswhentheChandlerextensionwasinitiallyconstructed,butsincethe
newerPromontoryHomeshadnotyetbeenbuilt,andtheadjacentstatetrustlandhadnotbeenofferedforsale,itwas
perhapswiseforthecitytowithholdtheexpenseuntiladevelopmentwasplannedandtheburdenoftheChandler
extensioncouldbesharedbythepurchaserofthestatetrustparcel.
Itnowseemsthatthedeveloperisappealingtotheplanningcommitteetoreducethiscommitmenttoourresidents,to
increasetheresponsetimesandaccessemergencypersonnelmayrequiretoreachourfamilies,andincreasethe
likelihoodofaccidentsinwestahwatukee.
Currently,ourneighborhoodcanexpectpoliceresponsetimesinexcessof45minutesandthenearestfirestationis
almost5milesaway.Ifthatdepartment'sresourcesarealreadyallocated,it'salmosttwiceasfartothenextclosest
firehouse.
Inaddition,wehaveroutinelyencounteredcarspassingothercarsutilizingthecenterturnlane,ina35mphzone,
furtherendangeringcyclistsandsidewalkusers.Thecurrentvolumeofcarscongestingthe2lanesegmentofthe
Chandlerextensionisencouragingdriverstodisobeythestopsignat27thAve.Furthermore,therearewellknow
dangersandaccidents(includingfatalities)at17thAveandlibertylanethatjustifyimprovementstothatintersection
anddemonstratestheexistingvolumeoftrafficisinadequatelycontrolledbythesystemsinplace.
Myfamilyandcommunityurgesyoutomaintainthethecurrentalignmenteastof17thAvethroughto27thAvenue,
with2lanesineachdirection,acenterturnlane,amodestspeedlimit,adequatebicycle&pedestriansafeguards,and
toavoidbeingpersuadedbythemotivationsofthedeveloper.Thecharacterofourcommunity,thesafetyofyour
constituents,andthespiritofgoodcommunitystewardshipisatstake.
Sincerely,
ChrisRosewell
2750WSilverFoxWay,Phoenix,AZ85045
480Ͳ577Ͳ8850






Page 555
Racelle Escolar

From: Christina S
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 6:06 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Foothills Reserve - Chandler Blvd. expantion


Planningcommission,

IhavelivedintheDesertFoothillscommunityfor19years.Theabilityforingressandegresshasalwaysbeen
challenging,withPecosroadbeingtheonly2laneroadformanyyears.CurrentlyChandlerBlvdisaonelaneroad,It's
congestedandhasbeenshutdownduetoemergencyvehiclesattendingtoSouthMountaininthepast.Therewillbe
moretrafficonChandlerBlvdduetotheBranfordHomesprojectadding1,000morehomes.ChandlerBlvdshouldbe2
lanesEastandWestsoemergencyvehiclescaneasilyservethecommunity.Aonelaneroadservicing7developments
plusadding1,000morehomesnotenough.Iftherewasawildfireandweallhadtoevacuatewouldwebeableto???…
notsuretheroadcouldhandleitwithjustonelane.
BranfordneedstotakeresponsibilityandexpandChandlerBlvdto2lanesineachdirectionand1turninglanesothe
communitycanreactifthereisanemergency.

Thanks
ChristinaSchafer





Page 556
Racelle Escolar

From: Peter Minder
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 2:30 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Peter Minder
Subject: Blandford Homes proposal for the Foothills Reserve area


IstronglybelievethattheChandlerBlvd.extensionapproachingtheFoothillReservecommunityshouldbewidened
sinceanewcommunitybyBlandfordHomesisbeingcreated.

Thisextensionroadistoosmalltoaccommodatetheextracars,pedestrians,andbicyclesthatwillusethispath.

Ibelievetheoriginalplansforthisextensionhavealwaysidentifiedthatwithnewdevelopmentsthisroadshouldbe
widened.

Pleasedonotallowmorehometobebuiltinthisareaswithoutwideningthisimportantstretchofroad.


Thankyou,


ChunZeng
3029WWindsongDr
Phoenix,AZ85045





Page 557
Racelle Escolar

From: goodellcl2@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 6:16 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Widening of Chandler Blvd Near Foothills Reserve



Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a concerned resident and homeowner in the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located
north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project.
I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard
extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at
Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.


The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) will
be greatly impacted by this new development.

We currently need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension
was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.
I'm aware of the City’s master plan, from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two lanes
in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane. Original plans also included a Fire Station
West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension.
The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project should
command the city's focus to these original plans.

I’d also like the City to consider proactive planning and budgeting for the intersections at 17th Avenue and
Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have been the
subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding
these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only
worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Please consider the safety needs of our collective communities.

Claudia Goodell
(505) 681-0171





Page 558
Racelle Escolar

From: David Walker
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 12:49 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Blandford Homes Project- Ahwatukee



Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my
opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have
lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 1987 and was at the
public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the City’s master plan
which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the
Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar
screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project
will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard! 




Sincerely,
David Walker
Homeowner and Registered Voter





Page 559
Racelle Escolar

From: Diana Rehbein
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 2:40 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Blvd widening and Fire Station


August31,2022

DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

MyhusbandandIarecurrentresidentsoftheSunriseDevelopmentandHOAmembersoftheFoothillsReserve
Community.OurhomeislocatednearthecrossstreetsofShaughnessyand27th,justwestandnorthofthefuture
BlandfordHomesDevelopment.We’rewritingtovoiceouroppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavethe
ChandlerBoulevardextensionwestof17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexistingtrailheadandthestopsignat
ShaughnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

WehavemanyfamilymemberslivinginAhwatukeeandbeforebuyingourhomein2019wewereawareofthecity’s
masterplanwhichincludedaFireStationWestof17thAvenueandwe’veheardtalkofaproposedCityofPhoenixPark
northoftheChandlerextension.Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitheroftheseitemsseemtostillbeontheCity’sradar.
Theadditionofmorethan1,000homesandadditionalresidentsintheBlandfordHomesDevelopmentwillonlycause
trafficdelaysandworsenemergencyresponsetimes.Mostresidentsthatwehearfromwhoarelivinginthe
neighborhoodswestoftheStateTrustLand/futureBlandfordDevelopment,FoothillsReserve,Calabrea,andnow
Promontory,areextremelydismayedthattheseitemshavenotbeenrealized.

WehopetheCitywillsticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineach
directionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Finally,we’dliketheCitytotakeamoreproactiveplanningandbudgetingroleontheintersectionat17thAvenueand
LibertyLane.Thisintersectionhasbeenthesubjectofrecentincreasesinaccidentsandisindesperateneedoftraffic
control.Thetimingofaddingthistrafficlightshouldnotbeputoffuntilthenewdevelopmentisnearcompletion.The
situationwillonlyworsenoncedevelopmentbeginstoincreasetraffic.

Thankyouforyourserviceandforyourconsiderationoftheabove,

DianaRehbein(&MichaelRehbein)
2725WWildwoodDr.
Phoenix,AZ
Rehbein.dianak@gmail.com







Page 560
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Blandford Homes/Chandler Road Extension



From: Don Trujillo
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 3:03 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission ; Council District 6 PCC

Subject: Blandford Homes/Chandler Road Extension

Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal
that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing
trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

Chandler road is the only access for my family and it does concern me that with the additional traffic, impacts
to emergency services will be impacted. Being on the Western edge of Ahwatukee, I've noticed the lack of
police presence in the area already. I've fortunately never had to use either EMT or Fire, but I recognize that
any impact to Chandler Road will cause delays.

I'm asking for the planning commission to reconsider their requirement to not expand Chandler. Builder's in
today's market can expand that road and the cost is just put into the houses anyway.

Thank you and I appreciate your work. If you have any questions, please let me know.
--
Don Trujillo
720-724-3284





Page 561
Racelle Escolar

From: Corrine Heyeck
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 11:23 AM
To: Council District 6 PCC; PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Erik Heyeck
Subject: Blandford Homes Project Impact to Community


Dear Planning Commission Members,

We are current residents of the Foothills Reserve. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy, immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. We are writing to
voice opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and Promotory) have lived
with broken promises by the City for too long. We’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 1998 and were at the public
meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the City’s master plan which
included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler
extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen.
The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only
worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

Additionallyourhomeownersinsuranceratesareimpactedbytheproximityofafirestation.Weareoutofthe
allowablerangetoqualifyforlowerrates.Insurancecompaniesunderstandtherisk,andsurelythecityshouldaswell.

We need the City to stick to its plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two lanes
in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, we’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Erik and Corrine Heyeck 

2811 W. Cottonwood Ln. 
Phoenix, AZ 85045
480-241-1280

Page 562
Racelle Escolar

From: Kay Willson
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 8:36 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Opposed unchanged to Chandler Blvd





DearPlanningCommissionMembers,


ThepurposeofthisletteristotransmittheobjectionsoftheFoothillsReserveBoardofDirectors,for
itselfandits589constituentswhoareopposedtothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavetheChandler
BoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchanged.

TheFoothillsReserveHOAislocatednorthandsouthofShaughnessyimmediatelyadjacenttotheproposedBlandford
HomesProjects.AllthreecommunitiesWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calebrea,andnowPromotory)
areunitedinouroppositiontothecurrentplan.

Wealreadyneedbetteremergencyservicesandresponsetimesinourarea.WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom
2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineachdirectionwithbikelanesandacenterturning
lane.ThecurrentplanandnewBlandfordprojectaddmorethan1000newhomestothearea,furtherimpacting
emergencyservicesandresponsetimes.

WewouldliketheCitytobemoreproactivewithplanningandbudgetingonimprovementsfor17thAvenueand
ChandlerBoulevardaswellas17thAvenueandLibertyLane.Thesetwointersectionshaveseenarecentincreasein
accidentsandareindesperateneedoftrafficcontrolsoonerthanlater.

The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near
completion. The situation will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with
increased and traffic volume.

We hope that the Commission is listening and that our concerns will be addressed. We’re
watching and voting on results that show that our communities are being heard.


Regards,

Foothills Reserve Board of Directors
ͲͲ
TEAMWORKͲ"Aboatdoesn'tgoforwardifeachoneisrowingtheirownway".
480Ͳ550Ͳ1093






Page 563
Racelle Escolar

From: Fred Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:50 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Cc: foothillsreserve@wearevision.com
Subject: Ahwatukee Foothills Reserve - Blandford Homes - Traffic Access


GoodMorning,
I’velivedinAhwatukeeFoothillsReservefor16years.AftertheconstructionoftheSouthMountain202freeway,
ChandlerBlvdwasextendedfromaround17thAvetomeetupwithShaughnessy.Withthelimitednumberofhomesin
FoothillsReserve,thiswasanadequatetrafficroutetotherestofAhwatukeeandthe202freewayvia17thAve.Withthe
upcomingdevelopmentbyBlandfordHomesUpperCanyonhomes,thisroadwaycannotpossiblybeenoughtoservice
theadditionaltraffic.Herearetheassumptions:

x 1,050newsingleͲfamilyhomes
x 150townhouses
x 329apartments
x 1,539totalnewresidences
x Assume1.5workingpeople(outsidethehome)perhousehold
x Assume.25highschoolorcollegestudentsperhousehold(drivers)
o Thisequatestoabout2,700newdriversontheroadformorningandeveningrushhoureachweekday
x Assume80%ofthesedriverswillbeenteringandexitingthe202freewayat17thAve
o Thisequatestoabout2,200driversenteringandexitingthefreewayduringrushhoureachday

Blandford’sproposaltoNOTwidenChandlerBlvdisridiculous.Everydaywillbeazoo.Accidentswillincrease.RoadͲ
ragewillgothroughtheroof.FireandAmbulanceaccesswillbeseverelyrestricted.

InadditiontowideningChandlerBlvd,thereshouldbeanadditionalfreewayexit/entrancebuiltatthesouthwestcorner
ofthepropertytohandlemuchofthenewtraffic.

Thanks
FredErickson
(480)225Ͳ8193(c)






Page 564
Racelle Escolar

From: W ROHR
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:55 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Widen the Chandler extension to Shaugnessy as Originally planned


DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

IamacurrentresidentoftheFoothillsReserveHOA.FoothillsReserveislocatednorthandsouthofShaugnessy
immediatelyadjacenttothewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrent
proposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexisting
trailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calebrea,andnowPromotory)havelivedwith
brokenpromisesbytheCityfortoolong.I’velivedinAhwatukeesince1987andwasatthepublicmeetingsattheGrace
Innnearly20yearsagowheneveryonewasshowntheCity’smasterplanwhichincludedaFireStationWestof17th
AvenueaswellasalargeCityofPhoenixParkNorthoftheChandlerextension.Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitherof
theseitemsseemtostillbeontheCity’sradarscreen.Theadditionofmorethan1,000homesandadditionalresidents
intheBlandfordHomesprojectwillonlyworsentheeffectsofthesedelays.

Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetimes.Lessthantwoyearsago,theChandlerextensionwasshutdowninboth
directionsforanEMThelicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffany
emergencyaccesstoourthreeneighborhoods.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineach
directionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Finally,I’dliketheCitytotakeamoreproactiveplanningandbudgetingroleontheintersectionsat17thAvenueand
ChandlerBoulevardaswellas17thAvenueandLibertyLane.Thesetwointersectionshavebeenthesubjectofarecent
increaseinaccidentsandareindesperateneedoftrafficcontrol.Thetimingofaddingthesetwotrafficlightscannot
waituntilthenewdevelopmentisnearcompletion.Thesituationwillonlyworsenoncedevelopmentbeginsonthe
statetrustlandwithanincreaseintrafficvolume.

Ourcommunitiesareunitedanddeservetobeheard!





Page 565
Racelle Escolar

From: Greg Vannatter
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:50 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Blandford Homes Proposal


WeunderstandthatBlandfordHomesisnowproposingthattheydoNOTwidenChandlerBlvdinconjunctionwiththeir
upcoming1,100housingproject.Really?Canonetrulybelievethattheydidn’tunderstoodthiscostwhenthey
producedabidfordevelopingtheproperty?Wasn’tthispartofthedealwhenputtingthispropertyoutforbid?We’re
confidentthattheplanningcommissionwillnotallowthemselvestobehoodwinkedbyBlandfordHomes.

Sincerely,

GregandSueannVannatter
2716W.WildwoodDr.







Page 566
Racelle Escolar

From: Gregory Harding
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 2:15 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Chandler Blvd Extension in the Foothills Reserve


IamahomeownerintheFoothillsReserve.IamvehementlyopposedtotheproposedwideningoftheChandlerBlvd
extension.Donotdestroyourneighborhood!

GregoryHarding
2913W.SilverFoxWay





Page 567
Racelle Escolar

From: knhnj@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:46 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Widening of Chandler Road extension


Dear Planning Commission Members,

My family moved into the Foothills Reserve this past year We are residents of the Foothills Reserve
HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the
new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave
the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and
the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will be
problematic if the access via Chandler Blvd. is not improved.

We need better emergency response times. I learned that less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South
Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to THREE neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane. This will be needed as there will be a
significant increase in auto traffic with more than 1000 new homes! I am a physician and do not want to be
stuck waiting to get to/from the hospital.

Our communities are united because our safety is at stake and deserve to be heard!


Howard Lakritz
16033 S. 29th Ave
Phoenix AZ 85045







Page 568
Racelle Escolar

From: Ildiko Sloan
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 8:22 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Chandler Blvd and Blandford Homes


IamaresidentoftheFoothillsReserveneighborhoodandamconcernedaboutBlandfordHomesrequesttokeep
ChandlerBlvdwestof17thasonlyonelaneineachdirectionwithaturnlane.Weweretoldthatthecurrentroadwould
bewidenedwhenhomeswerebuiltonthelandimmediatelytooureast.Adding1000homeswillincreasetraffic,
creatingasafetyissue.PleaseholdBlandfordHomestothepromiseofwideningtheroad.

Additionally,pleaseconsideraddingatrafficlightat17thandChandleraswellasLibertyLaneand17th,asbothofthese
intersectionshavebecomeincreasinglydangerousandwillonlybecomemoresowiththeadditionof1000homes.

Thankyouforyourconsideration.

IldikoSloan






Page 569
Racelle Escolar

From: Jackson Balk
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 8:16 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Concerned Resident




Dear planning commission members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south
of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I am deeply
concerned by the proposal to forgo the Chandler Blvd expansion. This proposal appears to defy
logic by not expanding Chandler Blvd, but adding 1100 some new homes to the area. This would
drastically increase traffic and Police/EMT/Fire response times to the surrounding communities.
This issue now becomes a matter of community safety and well-being. 

Furthermore, this decision would completely disregard the needs of our community and more
importantly the promises previously set forth by this communities city. We have patiently waited
not only for this road expansion but for a much needed Fire House West of 17th Avenue, and a
community park North of the Chandler extension. 

I am writing this to inform you of my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the
Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead
and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

I am asking you to please consider the needs of the people who call this beautiful city home, and
not just the requests of the home builders. 

“We all can work, but together we win” 





Page 570
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Opposition to Blandford homes request to forego the planned widening of the Chandler
Extension



From:JimBarnard
Sent:Wednesday,August31,20222:04PM
To:PDDPlanningCommission
Subject:OppositiontoBlandfordhomesrequesttoforegotheplannedwideningoftheChandlerExtension

DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

Iamacurrentresident(since2003)oftheFoothillsReserve.FoothillsReserveislocatednorthandsouthofShaugnessy
immediatelyadjacenttothewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrent
proposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexisting
trailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calebrea,andnowPromotory)havelivedwith
brokenpromisesbytheCityfortoolong.I’velivedinAhwatukeesince1988andremembertheCity’smasterplanwhich
includedaFireStationWestof17thAvenueaswellasalargeCityofPhoenixParkNorthoftheChandlerextension.
Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitheroftheseitemsseemtostillbeontheCity’sradarscreen.Theadditionofmorethan
1,000homesandadditionalresidentsintheBlandfordHomesprojectwillonlyworsentheeffectsofthesedelays.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineach
directionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

IamanavidcyclistandwaslookingforwardtothewiderChandlerBoulevardtomakemydailyridesaferforalltraffic
(vehicular,bicycleandpedestrian)usingthisportionoftheBoulevard.Thebridgesoverthetwowashesonthisportion
ofChandlerBoulevardhavealreadybeenconstructedtoaccommodatethewiderroadwayandnothavingtheroadway
aswideasplannedwouldbeaneyesoartothecommunity.

Feelfreetocontactmeifyouwouldliketodiscussfurther.

Regards,

JamesBarnard,CPA
2726WSilverFoxWay
Phoenix,AZ85045
602Ͳ721Ͳ6845
jamesbarnard1958@gmail.com





Page 571
Racelle Escolar

From: Mary Spurgat
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 2:57 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Widening of Chandler Blvd Extension


PlanningCommissionMembers:

WeareemailingyoutoletyouknowwevehementlyopposeBlandfordHomes’oppositiontothewideningofthe
ChandlerBlvdextension.WehavelivedinFoothillsReserveSunriseforoverfiveyears.Whenweboughtourhomein
2017,weknewabouttheconstructionof202SouthMountainFreeway.Whilemostneighborswereconcernedabout
increasednoise,light,andcrime,weknewthatthefreewaywasbadlyneededandthatthosesameneighborswho
opposeditwouldbeusingitregularly.

ThesameistrueforthewideningofChandlerBlvdextension–itwillbebadlyneededoncethenewdevelopmentis
completed.WehavenoticedanincreaseintrafficwiththePromontoryneighborhoodthatwentinacoupleyearsago.If
1,100homesareplannedforBlandford’snewsubdivision,that’saminimumof2,200peoplebeingaddedtothe
neighborhood–asmalltown.

PLEASEsticktotheoriginalplanofwideningtheChandlerBlvdextensiontofourlanes.

Thankyou.

JeffandMarySpurgat





Page 572
Racelle Escolar

From: judy rupp
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 3:54 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Fwd: Blanford Homes Project





Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a concerned and current resident of the Foothills Reserve. Foothills Reserve is located
north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford
Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave
the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing
trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee
since 1994 and was at the public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when
everyone was shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th
Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although
critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The
addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project
will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured
hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three
neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot
wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once
development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Sincerely,

JudyRupp





Page 573
Racelle Escolar

From: Kathy Griffiths
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 2:32 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Blvd Widening Proposal


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of Shaugnessy
immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition
to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue
unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promontory)
have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 2011 and was told
that the City’s master plan included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix
Park North of the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on
the City’s radar screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford
Homes project will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Kathleen Griffiths
Foothills Reserve community member
o2bbikn@yahoo.com





Page 574
Racelle Escolar

From: katrina dupouy
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:34 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: concerned resident of Foothills Reserve.





Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am current resident of Foothills Reserve is located north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent
to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal
that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing
trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have
lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 1987 and was at the
public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the City’s master plan
which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the
Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar
screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project
will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Katrina Dupouy.





Page 575
Racelle Escolar

From: KLapierre
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:49 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Widening of chandler on blandford site


AsaresidentIhopefor.wideningofchandleraspromised.Weareatrisksincethereisonly1wayinandout.Godforbid
anaccidentthatblockslanes.Alsoweneedmorelanessincewecouldsee2500moretripsperdayonthissmallstreet.
Everywhereelsehas2lanes.Alsoweneedtrafficlights.Alsoweneedsoundwallasapas.we.stillsufferforqualityof
lifeandnoise.

Please.widentheroadanddonot.add.onstreet.parkingnear.park.





Page 576
Racelle Escolar

From: kevincebel@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 2:27 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue



Dear Planning Commission Members:

We are concerned homeowners in the Sunrise Foothills Reserve subdivision requesting your
thoughtful consideration of the plans for the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue
between the existing trailhead and the stop sign where Chandler Boulevard turns into
Shaugnessy. The plans for building an additional 1,000+ homes (!!!) in the new Blandford Homes
Project will almost certainly create significant traffic and safety issues for both the existing, as well as
the newly planned, communities. The 2 options currently on the table for your consideration seem to
be the following:

1) Leave the Chandler Boulevard extension unchanged from its current 3 lane configuration with one
lane in each direction, a center turning lane, and bike lanes;

2) Expand the Chandler extension into a 5 lane configuration with two lanes in each direction, a
center turning lane, and bike lanes.

A third option for your consideration:

3) Expand the Chandler extension into a 4 lane configuration with two lanes in one direction, a center
turning lane, and one lane in the other direction, and bike lanes (similar to the current configuration on
the short section of Chandler Boulevard between South 17th Avenue and South 19th Avenue).

We don't know how extensive the traffic analysis for the projected surge in traffic has
been, but hopefully you have all the required information necessary to make an informed
decision.
Thank you for your time and consideration,

Kevin and Maureen Ebel
2801 W Hiddenview Dr
Phoenix, AZ 85045














Page 577
Racelle Escolar

From: Khalil Darzi
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 12:09 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Concerned resident and homeowner FootHills reserve


Dearplanningcommissionmembers,
IamwritingtoVoicemyoppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionwestof
17thAve.unchangedbetweentheexistingtrailheadandthestopsignatShaughnessyandChandlerBoulevard.
Myconcerniswiththeadditional1000homesresidenceintheBlandfordhomeprojectwillcausedelayemergency
responsetimetomyneighborhoodandmyhousethereforeIamaskingtowidentheroadbetweenthe19thAve.and
theShaughnessystopsignforbetteraccessandbetterrespondtimetoemergencycalls.


SentfromYahooMailforiPhone[overview.mail.yahoo.com]





Page 578
Racelle Escolar

From: lenny.j.goodell@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 6:30 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Widening of Chandler Blvd Near Foothills Reserve



Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a homeowner in the Foothills Reserve located immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford
Homes project.
I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard
extension( West of 17th Avenue) at one lane in each direction.


The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) will
be greatly impacted by this new development.

We currently need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension
was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.
I'm aware of the City’s master plan, from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two lanes
in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane. Original plans also included a Fire Station
West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension.
The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project should
command the city's focus to these original plans.

I’d would also like the City to consider proactive planning and budgeting for the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Please consider the safety needs of our collective communities.

Thank you
Leonard Goodell








Page 579
Racelle Escolar

From: Lesa Abbey
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:29 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Foothills Reserve Proactive Planning


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my
opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calabrea, and now Promontory)
have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 2008, and I
understand that everyone was shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th
Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although critically
needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The addition of more than 1,000
homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects of these
delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Thankyouforlistening,

LesaAbbey
2810WBriarwoodTerrace
Phoenix,AZ85045


SentfromMail[go.microsoft.com]forWindows






Page 580
Racelle Escolar

From: Lisa Sean
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 8:31 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Emergency Response West of 17th Avenue



Dear Planning Commission Members,

As homeowners and current residents of the Foothills Reserve HOA (located north and south of
Shaugnessy, and immediately west of the new Blandford Homes project), we are writing to voice our
opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension west of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaughnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

We expect that the city planning committee will make the responsible decision to build a fire station west
of 17th Avenue to provide timely service to the nearby area. With cars from more than a thousand homes
further limiting emergency vehicle access, it is unconscionable that the Blandford project would NOT be
expected to expand Chandler Boulevard in the absence of a strategically located fire station.

We expect that the City will honor their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as
two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane. We further urge the committee to
budget for and build a fire station to service this area, as has been discussed.

Please make responsible choices for all of the residents (new and future) west of 17th Avenue; not choices that will
benefit a developer who will not have to live with the consequences.

Sincerely,
Lisa and Sean Klunder





Page 581
Racelle Escolar

From: lorrin ferdinand
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 6:09 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Concerned Resident of Foothills Reserve


Hello,

Iagreewithmanyresidents'concernsabouttheChandlerBlvdextension.Asoriginallyplannedandagreedtobythe
builderin2015/2016,thewideningofChandlerBlvdshouldgoforward.Itwouldbeirresponsibletoallowthebuilderto
cutcornersinthismanner.Pleasedemonstrateprudentstewardshipofyourcommunityandopposethisproposed
changeforthebenefitofyourconstituents.

Yourconstituentsareunitedinopposingthisproposedchange,andyoushouldstandwiththem.

Regards,
LorrinFerdinand
ResidentinFoothillsReserve.





Page 582
Racelle Escolar

From: lmisturini@cox.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 1:26 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Blvd Extension


Dear Planning Commission Members,


I ask that you please consider your constituents and the future of our community when you vote on the
proposal to extend Chandler Blvd from the current one lane configuration in each direction to two lanes
with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Please don’t give in to corporate greed! Please compel Blandford homes to do the right thing by
widening Chandler Blvd.

Blandford will make plenty of profit from the new builds. I am sure they can afford to widen the road to
allow Fire/EMT/us to safely navigate our neighborhood.

Thank you for your consideration,
Louis Misturini – Ahwatukee homeowner (MountainVew community)
lmisturini@cox.net





Page 583
Racelle Escolar

From: Marley Watkins
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:31 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Chandler Blvd


IamahomeownerintheFoothillsReserve.ChandlerBlvd.mustbewidenedtoaccommodatetheincreasedtraffic.Do
notallowthebuilder’srequesttoallowChandlertoremainonlytwolanes.

MarleyWatkins
2813WestAmberwoodDr.





Page 584
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Blandford road problems



From:MarshaMorris
Sent:Wednesday,August31,202212:57PM
To:PDDPlanningCommission
Subject:Blandfordroadproblems

IamacurrentresidentoftheFoothillsReserveHOA.FoothillsReserveislocatednorthandsouthofShaugnessy
immediatelyadjacenttothewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrent
proposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexisting
trailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calebrea,andnowPromotory)havelivedwith
brokenpromisesbytheCityfortoolong.I’velivedinAhwatukeesince1987andwasatthepublicmeetingsattheGrace
Innnearly20yearsagowheneveryonewasshowntheCity’smasterplanwhichincludedaFireStationWestof17th
AvenueaswellasalargeCityofPhoenixParkNorthoftheChandlerextension.Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitherof
theseitemsseemtostillbeontheCity’sradarscreen.Theadditionofmorethan1,000homesandadditionalresidents
intheBlandfordHomesprojectwillonlyworsentheeffectsofthesedelays.

Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetimes.Lessthantwoyearsago,theChandlerextensionwasshutdowninboth
directionsforanEMThelicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffany
emergencyaccesstoourthreeneighborhoods.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineach
directionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Finally,I’dliketheCitytotakeamoreproactiveplanningandbudgetingroleontheintersectionsat17thAvenueand
ChandlerBoulevardaswellas17thAvenueandLibertyLane.Thesetwointersectionshavebeenthesubjectofarecent
increaseinaccidentsandareindesperateneedoftrafficcontrol.Thetimingofaddingthesetwotrafficlightscannot
waituntilthenewdevelopmentisnearcompletion.Thesituationwillonlyworsenoncedevelopmentbeginsonthe
statetrustlandwithanincreaseintrafficvolume.

Ourcommunitiesareunitedanddeservetobeheard!





Page 585
Racelle Escolar

From: Melissa Lanham
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 1:31 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Resident for Chandler Extension Expansion in Ahwatukee


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project.


I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard
extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at
Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane. The Chandler extension is already busy
enough with the current number of residents. Adding an entire community of 1000+ homes and
apartments will only exhaust the situation.

Our communities are united on this and deserve to be heard! I appreciate your attention to this matter and
hope your team will work with the Blandford Homes project and make the Chandler expansion a
mandatory piece of their project. 


Thank you,
Melissa Lanham





Page 586
Racelle Escolar

From: Minich, Melissa (Corporates)
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 12:44 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Cc: Terry Minich
Subject: Issue with no widening Chandler Blvd to accommodate additional homes that are being planned in
the area


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my
opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promontory)
have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 2006. I understand
that there were public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the
City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix
Park North of the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on
the City’s radar screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford
Homes project will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

KindestRegards,

MelissaMinich
ThiseͲmailisforthesoleuseoftheintendedrecipientandcontainsinformationthatmaybeprivilegedand/or
confidential.Ifyouarenotanintendedrecipient,pleasenotifythesenderbyreturneͲmailanddeletethiseͲmailand
anyattachments.Certainrequiredlegalentitydisclosurescanbeaccessedonourwebsite:
https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/resources/disclosures.html[thomsonreuters.com]





Page 587
Racelle Escolar

From: Michael Rehbein
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 1:59 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Blvd Extension Project


DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

MywifeandIhavebeenresidentsoftheFoothillsReservecommunitynorthofShaugnessyandimmediatelywestofthe
PhoenixSouthMountainCityParksince2019.WehavebeeneagerlyawaitingthecompletionoftheChandlerBlvd
plannedexpansiontofourlanes,asitwilleasetheexistingtrafficissuesaswellasdecreasethetimeforfireandpolice
responsestoourneighborhood.Withthefutureadditionof1000+residencesandconservatively2000additional
vehicles,theexpansionneedstogoforwardwithoutdelay.Unbelievably,theproposalsubmittedbyBlandfordHomesto
foregotheexpansionandleaveChandlerBlvdinitscurrentconfigurationisunacceptableandwestronglyrequest
rejectionbythePlanningCommission.

Additionally,thedelayoftrafficcontrolmeasuresattheintersectionof17thavenueandLibertyLanewill,inall
likelihood,resultinaneverincreasingnumberofaccidents.Atrafficlightthereisoverdue.

Thankyouforconsideringourpositionasyoudeliberatethisproposal.

WithRegards,

MichaelandDianaRehbein
2725WWildwoodDr
PhoenixAZ.85045


SentfrommyiPad





Page 588
Racelle Escolar

From: Mukesh Desai
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 3:09 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; council.distrci.6@phenix.gov; Bina Desai
Subject: Current proposal to chandler extension west of 17th ave


DearPlanningCommissionMembers:

IamaseniorcitizenandcurrentresidentofFoothillsReserve.Iandmywifehasbeenlivinginthiscommunitysince2009
andwishtolivehere.IunderstandthatthenewBrandfordHomesprojectwantstokeepthechandlerblvdextensionto
onelane,insteadofthecurrentplantoconverttotwolanes.Iamwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrentproposal
advocatedbythenewBrandfordHomesprojectproposal.Therearemanyseniorcitizenswhoresideinthiscommunity
andthetimerequiredtogetemergencyaccesstomedicalfacilitiesiscriticalforus.Weareafraidthattheadditionof
thousandplusadditionalhomesandresidentswillworsenthesituation.

Pleasesticktothecurrentplanofbroadeningchandlerblvdtotwolanesineachdirection.


ͲͲ

MukeshDesai
FoothillsReserveResident
480Ͳ815Ͳ4395





Page 589
Racelle Escolar

From: Patricia DeBose-Harding
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 2:26 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Widening of the Chandler Extension in Ahwatuke Reserve


DearSirs,

IamaconcernedresidentoftheFoothillsReserveandopposedtoBlanfordhomesrequesttoforegotheplanned
wideningoftheChandlerExtension.

Ican'timaginehowlongitwilltakechildrenusingthebustogotoschooloremergencyvehiclesrespondingtoan
emergency.ThisisunexceptableinAmerica.

Sincerely,

PatriciaDeBoseͲHarding





Page 590
Racelle Escolar

From: Patricia Van Haitsma
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 11:01 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition to current proposal of Blandford Homes


DearPlanningCommissionMembers,
IamaresidentofFoothillsReserve.FoothillsReserveislocatednorthandsouthofShaungessyimmediatelyadjacentto
thewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject
I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleaveChandlerBlvdextension,westof17thAve.
unchangedbetweentheexistingtrailheadandstopsignatShaunessy&ChandlerBlvd.
Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetime!LessthantwoyearsagotheChandlerextensionwasshutdownforanEMT
helicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffanyemergencyaccesstoourthree
neighborhoods.
WeneedtheCitytosticktothe2015&2016planthatshowedtheChandlerExtensionastwolanesineachdirection
withbikelanesandacenterturninglane.
IwouldliketheCitytotakeamoreproactiveplanning&budgetingroleontheintersectionsatthe17thAveand
chandlerBlvdaswellas17thAveandLibertyLane.Thesetwointersectionsareindesperateneedoftrafficcontrol.
Thetimingoftwotrafficlightscannotwaituntilthecompletionofthenewdevelopment
OurcommunitiesareUnitedanddeservetobeheard!
Mostsincerely,
PatriciaLVanHaitsma





Page 591
Racelle Escolar

From: Patrick Reidy
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 2:11 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Concern Over Non-Widening of Chandler Extension by Blanford Homes


DearPlanningCommissionMembersandSalDiccio’sOfficeͲ

MynameisPatrickReidyandIamaconcernedhomeownerintheFoothillsReserve.

IamwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBlvdextensionWestof17th
Aveunchanged.Thisisunacceptableandmorebrokenpromises.

TheCity’splanfrom2015and2016showedthewideningoftheChandlerExtensionfromitscurrentonelane
configurationineachdirectionstotwolaneswithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.TheCityplanneditswayto
accommodatetheextratrafficfor
1100newhomesaswellasaddedcapacityformoretimelyresponsesbyPolice,FireandEMTServices.Whythechange?
TheCityneedstosticktoitsplansandforceBlanfordHomestopayfortheroadexpansion.

IamnotsurewhoontheplanningcommitteeisbenefitingbyallowingBranfordhomestogetawaywiththisegregious
action.Ihopeyouwillmaketherightdecisionforthecommunity.







Page 592
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Blandford Homes proposed change



From:PeterMinder
Sent:Wednesday,August31,202211:10AM
To:PDDPlanningCommission
Cc:PeterMinder
Subject:BlandfordHomesproposedchange

AsaresidentoftheFoothillsReserveneighborhood,IstronglyobjecttoBlandfordHomes'proposalnottowidenthe
ChandlerBlvd.extension.OurFoothillscommunityistoolargetoallowmorehomesestablishedbyBlandfordHomes
withoutawiderroadtotravelon.

TheCity’splanfrom2015and2016showedthewideningoftheChandlerExtensionfromitscurrentonelane
configurationineachdirectiontotwolaneswithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.TheCityplanneditthiswayto
accommodatetheextratrafficfrom1100newhomesaswellasaddedcapacityformoretimelyresponsesbyPolice,Fire
andEMTservices.

PleasedonotallowourgoodestablishedcommunityintheFoothillsReservetobeimpactedinsuchanegativemanner
bythisrequestnottowidentheroad.

Thankyou,

PeterMinder
3029WWindsongDr
Phoenix,AZ85045





Page 593
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Homeowner in the Foothills Reserve concerning Chandler extension



From:PortiaBarna
Sent:Wednesday,August31,202212:47PM
To:PDDPlanningCommission;CouncilDistrict6PCC
Subject:HomeownerintheFoothillsReserveconcerningChandlerextension

DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

IamacurrentresidentoftheFoothillsReserveHOA.FoothillsReserveislocatednorthandsouthofShaugnessy
immediatelyadjacenttothewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrent
proposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexisting
trailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

I'vebeenlookingforwardtothisextensionsincemovingintotheneighborhoodinearly2020.Itwasneededthenbut
theadditionofmorethan1,000homes,makesitmandatory.WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016
thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineachdirectionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Thankyouforthetimeandpleasetaketohearttheconcernsofourcommunity.





Page 594
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Concerns



From:ManicManagedMom
Sent:Wednesday,August31,202212:37PM
To:PDDPlanningCommission
Subject:Concerns

IliveinAhwatukeeintheFoothillsReservewhichislocatednorthandsouthofShaugnessyimmediatelyadjacenttothe
westofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleave
theChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexistingtrailheadandthestopsignat
ShaughnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetimes.Lessthantwoyearsago,theChandlerextensionwasshutdowninboth
directionsforanEMThelicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffany
emergencyaccesstoourthreeneighborhoods.Thankgoodnesswedidn'thaveamajoremergencylikeadesertfirethat
wouldhaverequiredourneighborhoodtoneedamassescape.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineach
directionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Finally,I’dliketheCitytotakeamoreproactiveplanningandbudgetingroleontheintersectionsat17thAvenueand
ChandlerBoulevardaswellas17thAvenueandLibertyLane.Thesetwointersectionshavebeenthesubjectofarecent
increaseinaccidentsandareindesperateneedoftrafficcontrol.Thetimingofaddingthesetwotrafficlightscannot
waituntilthenewdevelopmentisnearcompletion.Thesituationwillonlyworsenoncedevelopmentbeginsonthe
statetrustlandwithanincreaseintrafficvolume.

Pleasedosomethingtokeepussafe.Please!!!!

Thankyou,

RachelHarris
ConcernedResident





Page 595
Racelle Escolar

From: Ravi Velnati
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:37 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: REQUEST from a concerned RESIDENT & HOME OWNER - OPPOSITION to BLANDFORD HOMES
request to forego the planned widening of the Chandler Extension




Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a past board member and current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA.

Foothills Reserve is located north and south of Shaughnessy immediately adjacent to
the west of the new Blandford Homes project.

I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler
Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead
and the stop sign at Shaughnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and
now Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long.
I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 1987 and was at the public meetings at the Grace Inn
nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the City’s master plan which included
a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the
Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be
on the City’s radar screen.

The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford
Homes project will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an
injured hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our
three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and
Liberty Lane.


Page 596
These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights
cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only
worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic
volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Thank you in advance for hearing and acting on our safety and livability
concerns!

5DYL9HOQDWL







Page 597
Racelle Escolar

From: Rebecca Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 9:03 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Opposition to current Chandler Blvd proposal




DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

IamacurrentresidentoftheFoothillsReserve,locatednorthandsouthofShaugnessy
immediatelyadjacenttothewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’mwritingtovoicemy
oppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof
17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexistingtrailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyand
ChandlerBoulevard.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextension
astwolanesineachdirectionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.Theadditionofmore
than1,000newhomeswillonlymakeexistingissueswithetrafficandemergencyresponse
timesworsewithouttheimprovementstoChandlerBoulevard.

Finally,I’dliketheCitytotakeamoreproactiveplanningandbudgetingroleonthe
intersectionsat17thAvenueandChandlerBoulevardaswellas17thAvenueandLibertyLane.
Thesetwointersectionshavebeenthesubjectofarecentincreaseinaccidentsandarein
desperateneedoftrafficcontrol.Thetimingofaddingthesetwotrafficlightscannotwaituntil
thenewdevelopmentisnearcompletion.Thesituationwillonlyworsenoncedevelopment
beginsonthestatetrustlandwithanincreaseintrafficvolume.

Ourcommunitiesareunitedanddeservetobeheard!







Page 598
Racelle Escolar

From: RJ Harrison
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 1:54 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Blvd extension.....


DearPlanningCommissionMembers….

Aslongtime(16years)residentsoftheSummitsubͲdivisionofFoothillsReservewehavewatchedtheareagrowand
heardalltheproposalsfordealingwiththatgrowth.FromthelongͲagoproposedFireStationandCityParktobebuilt
westof17thAvetothecreationoftheChandlerBlvdextensionandultimatelyexpansionoftheChandlerextension.The
expansionproposalcalledfor4lanes,bikelanesandaturninglanetobecompletedbeforethedevelopmentoftheland
southoftheextension.

Theexpansionprojectisvitalforthesafetyofourcommunity.Theadditionof1000plusresidencesbyBlandfordwill
createsignificanttraffictoanalreadyheavilytraffickedroad.Iseetheimpatienceofthedriversunderthecurrent
conditions.TheadditionofallthevehiclesfromtheBlandforddevelopmentwillmaketheChandlerextensionavery
dangerousroadway.Itwilladdtoalreadychallengingresponsetimesforemergencyvehicles.Bikeriders’safetywillbe
atsignificantlygreaterrisk.

Pleasedotherightthingandfollowthroughwiththeproposal(promise)toexpandtheChandlerBlvdextensionbefore
theBlandfordconstructionbegins!

Thankyou….

RJ&JaneHarrison
16218S29thDrive





Page 599
Racelle Escolar

From: Robert Wiggins
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 2:51 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Boulevard extension and Blandford Homes project proposal opposition


To whom it may concern,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve and A-1/A-2 HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project in Ahwatukee. I’m writing to share my
opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged
between the existing trailhead West of S 18th Dr and the stop sign at W Shaughnessey Road and Chandler Boulevard.
I understand that the city had plans back in 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension with two lanes in each
direction, along with bike lanes and a center turning lane. What about the plans for the fire station? Although I have not
needed it, I’ve been told by neighbors that emergency response times are lengthy. There were also plans for a City Park.
What happened to that? 
Traffic is already a problem and adding another 1,000 homes will only exacerbate it. Your reconsideration of the original
proposal to expand the extension is requested. 

Thank you, Robert





Page 600
Racelle Escolar

From: Rod Hofeling
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 4:02 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: GPA- AF -1-22-6


Towhomitmayconcern:

Iamahomeowner/residentinPromontoryatFoothillsWest.Iwanttogivemyoppositiontoproposedchangestothe
GeneralPlanregardingShaughnessy/ChandlerBlvdandthedevelopmentbyBlandfordhomes.

Iamveryconcernedaboutthelogicoftheproposedchanges.asIunderstandchangestotheplanarebeingrequested,
howeverthosechangeswouldcreatesafetyandtrafficconcernsinmyopinion.Iamalsodeeplyconcernedaboutthe
abilityofsafetyresourcestoreachthecommunitieswestof17thAveshouldthechangesbeapproved.

Sincerely,
RodHofelingRE/MAXFoothills


Rod Hofeling
Designated Broker/Owner
CRS, CLHMS, GUILD, RENE
RE/MAX Foothills
1345 E Chandler Blvd #219
Phoenix, AZ 85048
602-549-0169
SearchAZ.net[searchaz.net]

To help protect y our priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.






Why RE/MAX - Join RE/MAX [joinremax.com]






Page 601
Racelle Escolar

From: Roger Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 7:52 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: council.district.6@phoenix.gov


Hello,

IwouldliketovoicemyopinionfortheBlandfordhomesprojectandtheextensionoftheChandlerBlvd.
Iamafoothillsreserveresident,2722WAshurstDr,Phoenix,AZ85045since2006.
WereallyneedtoextendthelanesontheChandlerBlvdwiththeBlandfordHomesbeenbuiltinthenextfewyears.
Itisveryimportanttokeepthetrafficflowingfreelywithoutanydailyaccidentsandeachhouseholdhasaminimumof
atleastthreecarsiftheyoccupyafamilyhome.

PleaseconsiderthisasaveryimportantaspectfortheBlandfordbuild.

Thankyou
RogerandRekhaHawkins

SentfrommyiPhone





Page 602
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Opposition to Proposed Chandler Blvd (19thAve to 27Th Ave) Street Classification Amendment



From:rjriccio1@cox.net
Sent:Wednesday,August31,202212:02PM
To:PDDPlanningCommission
Cc:rjriccio1@cox.net
Subject:OppositiontoProposedChandlerBlvd(19thAveto27ThAve)StreetClassificationAmendment

SubjectReference:

Application#:GPAͲAFͲ1Ͳ22Ͳ6(ContinuedfromAugust4,2022)Request:StreetClassificationͲMapAmendment
Location:ChandlerBoulevardapproximatelybetweenthe19thand27thAvenuealignments,and27thAvenuebetween
ChandlerBoulevardandtheLoop202FreewayProposal:MinorGeneralPlanAmendmenttochangetheGeneralPlan
StreetClassificationMapdesignationonChandlerBoulevardfromArterialStreettoCollectorStreet;and27thAvenue
fromArterialStreettoLocalStreet.Applicant:AlanBeaudoin,NorrisDesignOwner:TomLemon,Reserve100,LLC
Representative:AlanBeaudoin,NorrisDesign

DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

AsahomeownerintheCalabreaandFoothillsReservedevelopments,I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrent
proposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexisting
trailheadandthestopsignatShaunesseyandChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calabrea,andnowPromotory)havelivedwith
brokenpromisesbytheCityfortoolong.I’velivedinAhwatukeesince1988andwasatthepublicmeetingsattheGrace
Innnearly20yearsagowheneveryonewasshowntheCity’smasterplanwhichincludedaFireStationWestof17th
AvenueaswellasalargeCityofPhoenixParkNorthoftheChandlerextension.Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitherof
theseitemsseemtostillbeontheCity’sradarscreen.

Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetimes.Lessthantwoyearsago,theChandlerextensionwasshutdowninboth
directionsforanEMThelicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffany
emergencyaccesstoourthreeneighborhoods.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineach
directionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

ChangingtheclassificationofChandlerBlvdtomaintainthecurrentasͲbuiltconfiguration,doesnotserveour
communityinWestAhwatukeeͲFoothillsinapositivemanner.

BestRegards,

RonRich

(480)Ͳ881Ͳ0326
rjriccio1@cox.net 




Page 603
Racelle Escolar

From: Savannah Hillebrand
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:49 AM
To: Council District 6 PCC; PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Foothills Reserve - Homeowner concerned with Chandler Blvd Extension


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a concerned homeowner and resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located
north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m
writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension
West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and
Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have
lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I recently purchased my home in Ahwatukee, so I am
a newer member, but I have communicated with residents residing in the community since 1987 who were
shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of
Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to
still be on the City’s radar screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the
Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Thank you,
Savannah Hillebrand 
ͲͲ
SavannahHillebrand
Seh356@nau.edu





Page 604
Racelle Escolar

From: Shari Wheeler
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 11:57 AM
To: Council District 6 PCC; PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Kevin Wheeler
Subject: Opposition to Blandford Homes plan


Dear Planning Commission Members,

We are current residents of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. We are writing to
voice our opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of
17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

In addition, the neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) need the support of the planning commission. We are aware of the City’s master plan which
included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler
extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items have been prioritized to fruition even though
they have been on the master plan for 20 years. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional
residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects of these delays and we need action
and support from you now more than ever. Review all of the details closely - the data is there to support
these needed upgrades and services to our communities.

Finally, we ask that the City take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at
17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections
have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The
timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The
situation will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic
volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Respectfully,

Sharon and Kevin Wheeler
16201 S 29th Ave 






Page 605
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Opposition on plans to forego the widening of Chandler Blvd between 17th and Chandler
Blvd/Shaugnessy



From:SherylRangelͲGethner
Sent:Wednesday,August31,202212:58PM
To:PDDPlanningCommission
Subject:OppositiononplanstoforegothewideningofChandlerBlvdbetween17thandChandlerBlvd/Shaugnessy

DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof
17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexistingtrailheadandthestopsignatShaughnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

OriginallytherewasaCitymasterplanwhichincludedaFireStationWestof17thAvenueaswellasalargeCityof
PhoenixParkNorthoftheChandlerextension.Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitheroftheseitemsseemtostillbeonthe
City’sradarscreen.Theadditionofmorethan1,000homesandadditionalresidentsintheBlandfordHomesprojectwill
onlyworsentheeffectsofthesedelays.

Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetimes.Lessthantwoyearsago,theChandlerextensionwasshutdowninboth
directionsforanEMThelicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffany
emergencyaccesstoourthreeneighborhoods.

AttheveryleasttheCityshouldsticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwo
lanesineachdirectionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Imovedtothisareaforafeelingofpeaceandsecurity.Todate,Ihavebeenavictimofarobbery,Ihaveneeded
emergencyservicesbothpoliceandfireandtheresponsetimetogettomeleftmeinmoredangerthantheemergency
situationsthemselves.

Pleasedonotignoreourissuesanylonger.

Sincerely,

ͲͲ
SherylRangelͲGethner





Page 606
Racelle Escolar

From: Shubhi Karanjia
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 12:58 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Cc: Vispi Karanjia
Subject: Request Chandler Blvd be widened



Dear Planning Commission Members and Phoenix Council member Sal Diccio,

My name is Shubhi Karanjia and I have been a resident of foothills reserve in Ahwatukee in summit
subdivision from March 2006. Foothills Reserve summit subdivision is located north of Shaugnessy
immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition
to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue
unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

Chandler Blvd west of 17th avenue is the longest culdesac with thousands of homes and residents and
now additionally with the new blandford community. We were enticed to purchase a home in the original
woodside homes community by showing us the City’s masterplan, a park and a fire station on the state
trust land as well as two lanes each way on the chandler Blvd extension when Pecos road was converted
to the South mountain freeway. We have been given false promises by the city when the south mountain
freeway came into existence.


After living in this community for 16 years I have witnessed a few accidents and police situations in the
adjacent areas. I would like to describe some of them. We have had multiple trail rescues where the fire
engines ambulances have blocked one of the lanes and east bound and west bound traffic had to take
turns to go through that area. Also there was a big rig carrying cars and the driver had a heart attack and
he drove into the state trust land with the big rig which again closed down part of the road.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Thankyou
ShubhiKaranjia






Page 607
Racelle Escolar

From: Steve Lippens
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 9:36 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: slippens925@gmail.com
Subject: Application # GPA-AF-1-22-6


DearPlanningCommission,

IamwritingyoutodaytoexpressmydeepconcernaboutthisproposalfromBlandfordhomes.Tobeclear,Iamfully
AgainstthisgeneralplanamendmentrequestedbyBlandford.

WhenwepurchasedourlandandbuiltourhomehereintheCalabreadevelopmentwestof17thAve,wewere
comfortedbythefactthattheroadway(newlyconstructedsectionofChandlerBlvd.)connectingthewesternmostpart
ofAhwatukeetotherestofourbeautifulcommunitywasasaferoadforourkidstobikeandwalkonandforustodrive
on.Theroadwasdefinitelyampleforthehousingthatwasconstructedintheareaatthattime.Weknewand
understoodthatthelandsurroundingtheareafrom17thAvedowntowardsthewesternmostdevelopmentscouldbe
soldatsometimeandmanyhomescouldbebuiltonthatlandatafuturedate.However,wealsoknewthatinthe
eventthatthelandwassoldandhomesweretobeconstructedthattherewasaplaninplacetoincreasetheroadway
to4lanesplusacenterturnlaneintothenewdevelopments.Thisgaveusalevelofassurancethatthesafetyofour
kids,ourfamily,andthatofourneighborswouldbemaintained.

ThisproposalbyBlandfordtocircumventthenecessityoftheroadwayexpansionisnotonlyunwisebutmostdefinitely
adangerousproposition.Myunderstandingisthatwellover1000homesaretobebuiltinthatarea.Thevolumeof
traffic,biking/walking,andautomobileactivityinthatareaisgoingtogoupexponentially.Theroadwayhasthe
potentialtobecomeoneofthemostdangeroussectionsofroadwayinthePhoenixarea.Theintersectionon17thAve
isalreadyoneofthemoredangerousonesandthiswilljustcompoundtheissue.

AllowingBlandford'sproposaltopasswouldcreatedangerandconcerninmanyways.Safetywoulddecreaseterribly
withsinglelane/roadaccessinandoutofthewesternsectionofAhwatukee.Asingleaccidentcouldcompletelyblock
theroadwaywhichcouldpreventpolice/fire/orambulancefrombeingabletogetusresidentsasneeded.Emergency
responsetimescouldabsolutelybeimpactedandthatisariskthatwecannotaffordtotake.Andfurthermore,the
increaseintrafficfromthebuildingofthatmanyhomeswillcreatesuchcongestioninthatareathatitwillbecomea
realdangerzoneforaccidentsandhazards.Theroadwasalwayssupposedtobeincreasedinsizewhenthehousing
growthcommencedandweneedtostaywiththecorrectplanthathasbeeninplaceformanyyears.

Allowingthisamendmenttopasswouldbeaverydangerousidea.

PleasesupportkeepingthecurrentplaninplacesothatourcommunityandBlandfordhomescangrowtogetherina
safeandwellthoughtoutmanner.

Thankyouforyourconsideration.

Sincerely

StephenLippens
16612S32Lane
Phoenix,AZ85045
CalabreaDevelopment


Page 608
Racelle Escolar

From: steve glaza
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 9:38 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Concern Regarding Blandford Homes Canyon Reserve Development Plan


HelloandGreetings,

Weare10+yearresidentsoftheSunrisedevelopmentsituatedjustwestoftheproposedCanyonReservedevelopment
byBlandfordHomesofffromChandlerBoulevard.Wearestronglyopposedtothecurrentdevelopmentplaninwhich
anywideningofChandlerisabsent.It’sasimplematter……thatmanynewhomesandresidentsalreadyaddedtothe
developmentsinplacewithonlyonemaintwolanethoroughfareisn’tnearlyadequateforsafetyreasons.

Ourrequestissimple,requireareͲengineeringwithintheproposeddevelopmentplanthatincludesa
wideningofChandlerBoulevardalongwithotherextensiverevisionstothetrafficflowthatwillimpacttheareaonce
thisnewdevelopmentmovesforward.Andtobehonest,Blandfordshouldshowagoodfaithgesturetoallofthe
residentsof“west”AhwatukeebydonatingtotheCityofPhoenixthelandfromtheirwithindevelopmentforafuture
jointfire/policesubstation.

Thankyouforyourconsideration.

Bestregards,

SteveandJudyGlaza
2720WNighthawkWay
Phoenix


SentfromYahooMailforiPhone[overview.mail.yahoo.com]





Page 609
Racelle Escolar

From: Steve Hales
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 3:54 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Plan for west end of Chandler Blvd


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my
opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have
lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in the Ahwatukee Foothills since 1990 and
was at the public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the City’s
master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park
North of the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the
City’s radar screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford
Homes project will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!





Page 610
Racelle Escolar

From: ohalsu@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 11:57 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Foothills Reserve Resident - Opposed to not widening Chandler Blve










Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located
north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new
Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal
that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue
unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and
Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and
now Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long including
delay in a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park
North of the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items
seem to still be on the City’s radar. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and
additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects of
these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an
injured hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to
our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the
Chandler extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center
turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and
Liberty Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in
accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these
two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The
situation will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an
increase in traffic volume.



Page 611
Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!


Thank you,
Susan OHalleran
480-653-1307









Page 612
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Issue with no widening Chandler Blvd to accommodate additional homes that are being planned
in the area



From:TerryMinich
Sent:Wednesday,August31,202212:56PM
To:PDDPlanningCommission;CouncilDistrict6PCC
Subject:IssuewithnowideningChandlerBlvdtoaccommodateadditionalhomesthatarebeingplannedinthearea

DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

IamacurrentresidentoftheFoothillsReserve.FoothillsReserveislocatednorthandsouthofShaugnessyimmediatelyadjacentto
thewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavethe
ChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexistingtrailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyand
ChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calebrea,andnowPromontory)havelivedwithbroken
promisesbytheCityfortoolong.I’velivedinAhwatukeesince2006.IunderstandthattherewerepublicmeetingsattheGraceInn
nearly20yearsagowheneveryonewasshowntheCity’smasterplanwhichincludedaFireStationWestof17thAvenueaswellasa
largeCityofPhoenixParkNorthoftheChandlerextension.Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitheroftheseitemsseemtostillbeonthe
City’sradarscreen.Theadditionofmorethan1,000homesandadditionalresidentsintheBlandfordHomesprojectwillonlyworsen
theeffectsofthesedelays.

Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetimes.Lessthantwoyearsago,theChandlerextensionwasshutdowninbothdirectionsfor
anEMThelicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffanyemergencyaccesstoourthree
neighborhoods.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineachdirectionwith
bikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Finally,I’dliketheCitytotakeamoreproactiveplanningandbudgetingroleontheintersectionsat17thAvenueandChandler
Boulevardaswellas17thAvenueandLibertyLane.Thesetwointersectionshavebeenthesubjectofarecentincreaseinaccidents
andareindesperateneedoftrafficcontrol.Thetimingofaddingthesetwotrafficlightscannotwaituntilthenewdevelopmentis
nearcompletion.Thesituationwillonlyworsenoncedevelopmentbeginsonthestatetrustlandwithanincreaseintrafficvolume.

Ourcommunitiesareunitedanddeservetobeheard!

Sincerely,




[ovou.me]"Click image above to get my e-business card"


Page 613
Racelle Escolar

From: Tim Berger
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 7:54 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Cristina Berger
Subject: Opposition to Chandler Bvld Land Reduction


ComissionersͲ

TimothyE.andCristinaBerger
421E.WindermereDr.
PhoenixAZ85054

MywifeandIarevoicingouroppositiontotheproposedlanereductiontoChandlerBoulevardbyBlandfordHomes.

ChangingthedesignationofChandlerBvld
 
 DoesNOTbenefitexistinghomestothewestofBlandford’sHomesdevelopment
 DoesNOTbenefitpublicsafety
 DoesNOTbenefitfireandEMSͲincludingpossiblefuturefirestation
 DoesNOTbenefitBlandfordHomecommunitybeingdeveloped
 DoesNOTconsiderfutureresidentialconstructiononvacantparcelstothewest
 
 ThischangeONLYbenefitsBlandfordHomesbyreducingtheirinfrastructureinvestmentforthehomesthatthey
build.HoweverBlandfordknewthisrequirementwhentheypurchasedthisland.

 TheroadwideningisabsolutelynecessaryfortheabovereasonsandisNOTaMINORGeneralPlan
Amendment.ThiswillbecomeaMAJORongoingheadacheforcurrentandfutureresidentsofthearea.Areduction
wouldonlybenefitONEpersonͲJEFFBLANDFORD.

WerequestthatyouvoteNOforthisplanchange.

RegardsͲ

TimothyE.Berger
ManagingPartner
LuxAirJetCenters
Building#110
1658S.LitchfieldRoad
GoodyearAZ85338
Office623.932.1200
Cell480.203.4023
tberger@luxairjetcenters.com








Page 614
Racelle Escolar

From: Timothy Eull
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 8:54 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Public Comment - Request for review of GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Chandler Blvd Reclassification to Collector
St)



DearPlanning Commission Members,

IamapastboardmemberandcurrentresidentoftheFoothillsReserveHOA.FoothillsReserveislocatednorthand
southofShaugnessyimmediatelyadjacenttothewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’mwritingtovoicemy
oppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchanged
betweentheexistingtrailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calebrea,andnowPromotory)havelivedwith
brokenpromisesbytheCityfortoolong.I’velivedinAhwatukeesince1987andwasatthepublicmeetingsattheGrace
Innnearly20yearsagowheneveryonewasshowntheCity’smasterplanwhichincludedaFireStationWestof17th
AvenueaswellasalargeCityofPhoenixParkontheNorthsideoftheChandlerextension.Althoughcriticallyneeded,
neitheroftheseitemsseemtostillbeontheCity’sradarscreen.Theadditionofmorethan1,000homesandadditional
residentsintheBlandfordHomesprojectwillonlyworsentheeffectsofthesedelays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was
shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South
Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension
as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane. 

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections
at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two
intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of
traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new
development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once development begins on the
state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

SentfrommyiPad





Page 615
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Chandler Extension project - Foothill Reserve



From: Tom Locke
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 11:58 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission ; Council District 6 PCC

Subject: Chandler Extension project - Foothill Reserve

Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a concerned resident and homeowner in the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north
and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to
voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only tax
the existing single-lane Chandler extension into the neighborhood and delay other important projects that have
been promised such as a Fire Station and City Park.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut down
in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing
off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to honor their commitment from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane. This is a common-sense safety issue for all
existing and future residents of this area as it continues to expand.

Thank you for considering this request.


Tom Locke
2917 W Silver Fox Way
Phoenix AZ 85045
480.371.8063





Page 616
Racelle Escolar

From: Xavier Forns
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 2:42 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: opposition to Blandford homes request to forego the planned widening of the Chandler Extension.


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my
opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have
lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 1987 and was at the
public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the City’s master plan
which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the
Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar
screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project
will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

XavierForns





Page 617
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Voicing my concern and opposition to Blandford homes request to forego the planned widening
of the Chandler Extension.



From: YVES DE SOUZA
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 11:18 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission ; Council District 6 PCC

Subject: RE: Voicing my concern and opposition to Blandford homes request to forego the planned widening
of the Chandler Extension.

Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a concerned homeowner and resident of the Foothills Reserve Community in Ahwatukee. Foothills
Reserve is located north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford
Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler
Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at
Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have lived
with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 2015 and was told then that the
City’s master plan included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of
the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar
screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will
only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut down
in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing
off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two lanes in
each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have been
the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding
these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen
once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Sincerely,
Yves De Souza





Page 618
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Opinion for Blandford Home Proposition



From:AlyssaPalty
Sent:Thursday,September1,20222:59PM
To:PDDPlanningCommission
Subject:OpinionforBlandfordHomeProposition

DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

IamacurrentresidentoftheFoothillsReserveHOA.FoothillsReserveislocatednorthandsouthofShaugnessy
immediatelyadjacenttothewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrent
proposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexisting
trailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLandwerepreviouslyshownaFireStationWestof17thAvenueaswellasa
largeCityofPhoenixParkNorthoftheChandlerextension.Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitheroftheseitemsseemto
stillbeontheCity’sradarscreen.Theadditionofmorethan1,000homesandadditionalresidentsintheBlandford
Homesprojectwillonlyworsentheeffectsofthesedelays.

Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetimes.Lessthantwoyearsago,theChandlerextensionwasshutdowninboth
directionsforanEMThelicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffany
emergencyaccesstoourthreeneighborhoods.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineach
directionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Best,
AlyssaPalty
ConcernedResident





Page 619
From: Primrose of West Chandler
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Chandler Blvd Lane reduction
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 9:09:30 AM


We are for building two lanes in each direction and against Blandford’s proposal for only one lane in
each direction for the following reasons:


Emergency response time
Safety of single road access in/out - 1 accident can completely block roadway
Broken commitments from 2015/16
No community benefit from change
I live in the community just west.

Anita Patel




Page 620
From: Ashley Mekell
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: CONCERNED resident/ homeowner in the Foothills Reserve
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 8:44:23 AM


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve located north and south of Shaugnessy
immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice
my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension
West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at
Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City and ignored many times over these
types issues.

I’ve lived and grew in Ahwatukee since the mid-90’s and recall the City’s master plan which
included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North
of the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be
on the City’s radar screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents
in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects of these choices.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured
hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three
neighborhoods (thousands of people!)

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane. Please
do not cave to the Blandford people!

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot
wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once
development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard and for promises to be kept!

Thank you,
Ashley Jensen-Green
Foothills Reserve Resident




Page 621
Racelle Escolar

From: Bernice Volinsky
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 3:32 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: expansion of Chandler Blvd



Dear Planning Commission Members,

I live in the Foothills Reserve community near the intersection of Shaugnessy and 27th Ave in the
Sunrise community. My community would be West of the new Blandford Homes development. I’m
writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard
extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at
Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

Without the expansion, the area will become congested and make it difficult for First Responders
during emergencies.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was
shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

I understand the City previously planned (2015-2016) to expand the Chandler extension as two lanes
in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane. This would make accessibility easier.



Thank you,

Bernice Volinsky

2706 W Briarwood Ter

Phoenix, AZ 85045





Page 622
From: Tracy Garretson
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Extension
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 9:09:34 AM


Dear Planning Commission Members,

We are current homeowners in the Foothills Reserve community. Foothills Reserve is
located north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new
Blandford Homes project. We're writing to voice our opposition to the current proposal that
would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between
the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. Nearly 20 years ago
the public was shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th
Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although
critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The
addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes
project will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured
hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three
neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, we'd like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot
wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once
development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Chad & Tracy Garretson
2705 W Redwood Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85045




Page 623
From: Chuck King
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Opposition to Blanford Homes Request
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 8:10:58 AM


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve. Foothills Reserve is located north and
south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes
project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the
Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing
trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee
since 1987 and was at the public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when
everyone was shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th
Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although
critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The
addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project
will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured
hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three
neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Thank you

Chuck King




Page 624
Racelle Escolar

From: Crystal Rivali
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 7:00 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Consideration to forego the planned widening of the Chandler Extension




Dear Planning Commission Members,

I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard
extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at
Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods. The neighborhoods West of the
State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory)

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Thankyoukindlyforyourstrongconsideration,
CrystalandMichaelRivali(FoothillsReserve)





Page 625
From: Daniel Ferrer
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Blandford Construction in the Ahwatukee Foothills
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 11:02:42 AM


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident in the Ahwatukee Foothills neighborhood of Mountain View part of
the Foothills Reserve HOA. My neighborhood is located immediately adjacent to the west of
the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal
that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged
between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee
since 1987 and was at the public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when
everyone was shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th
Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although
critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The
addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project
will only worsen the effects of these delays.

Traffic times will worsen not only with the construction but with the added traffic. Our home
school is an 8-10 minute drive. The added traffic will definitely increase these driving times
for individual drivers and the bus routes as well.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. I've personally been witness to two accidents at
these intersections in less than 6 months time. The timing of adding these two traffic lights
cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen
once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Thank you,

Daniel Ferrer




Page 626
From: dianemparker@cox.net dianemparker@cox.net
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Blandford Homes Project
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 12:05:35 PM




Dear Planning Commission Members,

We are the original homeowners of property in the Foothills Reserve.

The Foothills Reserve is located north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the
west of the new Blandford Homes project. We are writing to voice our opposition to the
current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue
unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

The City’s original master plan included a Fire Station West at 17th Avenue. The only
change we have seen is the City of Phoenix Trailhead park at Chandler Blvd. and 19th Ave.
This is a extremely popular park especially in the fall and winter. All parking spots are full and
street parking is also full working its way down into foothills reserve area and into the desert.
There is a lot of activity with hikers, bikers and walkers, families etc.. crossing the road.

It appears that the Fire Station is no longer on the radar. We need better emergency
response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut down in both
directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

The addition of more than 1,000 homes (with multiple automobiles per household) along
with additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects of
these delays.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in
desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until
the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once development
begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.



Diane and Reginald Parker

Foothills Reserve




Page 627
From: erik langhofer
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Widening of road
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 7:45:22 AM




To whom it may concern:

My wife and I live in Calabrea Subdivision. We would like to voice our opposition to the proposed narrowing of the
road from the original design.
What we heard from the attorney that presented Blanford‘s case was the report of speeding along the current
roadway. To me this is a smokescreen because you have nearly a half a mile of property vacant property on both the
north and south side of this road with a 35 mile an hour speed limit. We realize that the speed limit is determined by
the width of the road. Not only do we need the extra lanes for ingress and egress but with the widening of the road
the speed limit would be changed to 45 miles per hour which would cut down the amount of speeding along that
road. It would be much safer for everyone involved.
The widening of the road was planned and anticipated by the city and the question comes why do we want to change
at the last minute. Is it to accommodate Blandford homes so they don’t have the cost of building the road and they
have more room to develop for their gain. Not wigging the road would greatly increase the danger on the road and it
would do nothing for the benefit of the community at large. The developer needs to bite the bullet and take care of
the surrounding neighborhoods.
Thank you.
Erik Langhofer


Sent from my iPhone




Page 628
From: Gayatri Mehta AZ-PHOENIX
To: Council District 6 PCC; PDD Planning Commission
Subject: opposition to Blandford homes request to forego the planned widening of the Chandler Extension.
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 8:00:15 AM




Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a registered voter and current resident of the Foothills Reserve
HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of Shaugnessy
immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes
project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that
would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue
unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at
Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve,
Calebrea, and now Promotory) have lived with broken promises by
the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 2002 and was at
the public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when
everyone was shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire
Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park
North of the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of
these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The addition
of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford
Homes project will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago,
the Chandler extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT
helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three
neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that
showed the Chandler extension as two lanes in each direction with
bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and
budgeting role on the intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler
Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two
intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents
and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding
these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near
completion. The situation will only worsen once development begins
on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!



Page 629
Thank You.

Gayatri Mehta,

Caution: This email is both proprietary and confidential, and not intended for transmission to
(or receipt by) any unauthorized person(s). If you believe that you have received this email in
error, do not read any attachments. Instead, kindly reply to the sender stating that you have
received the message in error. Then destroy it and any attachments. Thank you.




Page 630
From: Grant Lasiter
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Widening of Chandler extension
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:19:55 AM
Attachments: image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png



Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing
to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard
extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at
Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee
since 1987 and was at the public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when
everyone was shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue
as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although critically
needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The addition of
more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only
worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension
was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on
South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane.
These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in
desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait
until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once
development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Thank you for your time and consideration,



Page 631
Grant Lasiter
Branch Manager
Blue Bell Creameries, L.P.
5175 W. Watkins Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85043
Tel: 602-272-3201 | Fax: 623-888-5259
Mobile: 936-225-0601

bluebell.com [bluebell.com]
[bluebell.com]

[facebook.com] [twitter.com] [instagram.com] [pinterest.com]




This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com
[websense.com]




Page 632
From: Jacqueline Donnelly
To: Council District 6 PCC
Cc: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: concerned homeowner in the Foothills Reserve - please widen the Chandler extension to accommodate extra
traffic from over one thousand new homes being added
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 8:55:39 AM


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am associated with past board members and current residents of the Foothills Reserve
HOA and I reside in the Foothills Reserve. This is located north and south of Shaugnessy
immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice
my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard
extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the
stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I understand there
were public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the
City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large
these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The addition of more than 1,000
homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects
of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured
hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three
neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot
wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once
development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Thank you.
Sincerely,

Jacqueline Donnelly


Email: Jacqueline.Donnelly@tristargroup.net




Page 633
From: Jim Boyd
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Cc: Jenny Boyd
Subject: Blanford homes Ahwatukee
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 9:46:30 AM


To whom it may concern,

I believe Blanford home builder should widen the Chandler extension. They are planning on
building over 1,000 new homes so we need more access. A few years ago we had trouble
leaving our community because of emergency crews assisting someone on south mountain. I
could go into much more detail but bottom-line this is purely a money maker for them. More
homes built equals more money made for them. Money isn't everything , it's about doing
things correctly.

James and Jennifer Boyd




Page 634
Racelle Escolar

From: Jason Altzman
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 7:14 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Application #: GPA-AF-1-22-6 (Continued from August 4, 2022)


To whom it may concern,

I'm writing as a homeowner in one of the communities impacted by the General Plan Amendment request submitted by
Blandford homes, GPA-AF-1-22-6. 

This summary of this amendment is:

Minor General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Street Classification Map designation on Chandler
Boulevard from Arterial Street to Collector Street; and 27th Avenue from Arterial Street to Local Street

Our community would like to request an opportunity to meet with the planning committee members who will be reviewing
this request to express our concerns with this request and the negative repercussions it will create for residents west of
17th Ave. We can be available in person or remote. We have no issue with Blandford developing the former state land
parcel but have concerns with their request and how it changes the previous commitments given to us by Phoenix and
ADOT in 2015/2016. 

The original Chandler extension plan is documented in the "South Mountain Freeway FEIS/ROD Reevaluation #3 for
Chandler Boulevard: 27th Avenue to 19th Avenue" document found at (https://apps.azdot.gov/files/projects/south-
mtn/Post-ROD/SMF-Reevaluation-3-080316.pdf [apps.azdot.gov]). This document details the city's commitment to
building the road to 4 lanes plus a center turn lane, sidewalks and bike paths. From the document:



Thankyouforyourtimeandconsideration,


___________________
J. Altzman


+1.818.406.8043






Page 635
From: Jeff Freshour
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Please enforce the City"s 2015/2016 plan for widening Chandler Blvd extension
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 8:18:36 AM


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve community in Ahwatukee. Foothills Reserve
is located north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new
Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that
would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between
the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

At the public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago, the City showed its master
plan for this area, which included a fire station west of 17th Avenue as well as a large City
of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of
these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The addition of more than 1,000
homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects
of the delays in building a fire station and park.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured
hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three
neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot
wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once
development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

I appreciate your consideration of the above.

Jeff Freshour




Page 636
Racelle Escolar

From: Jen Matthews
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 8:25 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: IMPORTANT


CitofPhoenix,

Please,dotherightthing.ChandlerBoulevardbetween17thAvenueand27thAvenueneedstobewidened,as
promised,tothecommunityandresidentsofthatarea.IhavebeenlivingintheFoothillsReservessince2010andhave
seenCityplansandtalksaboutallthegreatthingsthatwillcomeofthisareaformuchneededimprovements.Ofall
thosethingswehaveseenparkingforthetrailhead.Aparkinglot.Thefirestation,thepstk,thelibrary,allthesegreat
thingshavenevercometofruitionandcontinuetobecut.BecauseofgreedbybuilderslikeBlandford,nowourroads
arebeingreclassifiedandignored.Wearetaxpayersandwearepartofthisstate48andwedeserveforourareastobe
caredforandnotignored.WhenADOTbuiltthefreeway,theyleftagapingholeonbothsidesofourcommunitywhich
reallyshowshowtheyfeelaboutus.Dobetter.Wearefedup.

WhenBlandfordstartsconstruction,it'sgoingtobeanabsolutenightmareforschoolbusesandcommuters.Thisisa
oneͲwayin,onewayoutcommunityforfivesubcommunitiesintheFoothillsReserves,Calabriaandamassamountof
newhomesintheProminatory.Thisisalreadyunsafeforthatmanybodiesbackhere.Howarebigdumptrucksand
workvehiclesgoingtobecomingandgoingwhilekeepingtheflowoftraffic?Thisroadisalreadycongestedandhas
issues.Thecornerof17thAvenueandLibertyhasrecentlybeenonthenewsfortheamountofaccidentsbecause
there'salackofCityPlanningandprevention.ThebridgeisbuiltaretoaccommodatewhattheinitialCityplanwas.So
whyisthatnotgoingtomoveforward?Blandfordliningpockets?Wedeservebetter.

MyAmericanDreamofenjoyingmylittlepieceoutbythemountainshasbeencrushed.It'sbeencrushedbyADOTand
nowtheCityofPhoenix.WhenIbecameaPhoenician20yearsago,thisisnothowIthoughtthecitywouldgreetme
andtreatme.

Mybest,
JenniferMatthews







Page 637
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: **Blandford Home's Request: BAD idea**



From:JennyBoyd
Sent:Thursday,September1,20226:20AM
To:CouncilDistrict6PCC;PDDPlanningCommission
Cc:JimBoyd
Subject:**BlandfordHome'sRequest:BADidea**

DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

WearecurrentresidentsoftheFoothillsReserveHOA,andhavelivedheresince2002(originalowner).FoothillsReserve
islocatednorthandsouthofShaugnessyimmediatelyadjacenttothewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’m
writingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17th
AvenueunchangedbetweentheexistingtrailheadandthestopsignatShaughnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calebrea,andnowPromontory)havelivedwith
brokenpromisesbytheCityfortoolong.We'velivedheresincethebeginningoftheneighborhoodwhenwewere
promisedthatanotherroadwouldbeaccessible,besidesPecosRoad.Wecan'trecallhowmanyyearsthattookto
happen,butwealwaysfeltthatintheeventofsomethingcatastrophicwewerealltrapped.Oncethatnewextension
wasadded,theytookPecosaway,which,again,madeitonewayin,onewayout.Asitstands,thetrafficissubstantialat
timesduringtheday,anditis"working"withtheamountofresidentswecurrentlyhave.Theadditionofmorethan
1,000homesandadditionalresidentsintheBlandfordHomesprojectwillonlyworsentheeffectsofthesedelays.

Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetimes.Lessthantwoyearsago,theChandlerextensionwasshutdowninboth
directionsforanEMThelicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffany
emergencyaccesstoourthreeneighborhoods.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineach
directionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Finally,I’dliketheCitytotakeamoreproactiveplanningandbudgetingroleontheintersectionsat17thAvenueand
ChandlerBoulevardaswellas17thAvenueandLibertyLane.Thesetwointersectionshavebeenthesubjectofarecent
increaseinaccidentsandareindesperateneedoftrafficcontrol.Thetimingofaddingthesetwotrafficlightscannot
waituntilthenewdevelopmentisnearcompletion.Thesituationwillonlyworsenoncedevelopmentbeginsonthe
statetrustlandwithanincreaseintrafficvolume.

Ourcommunitiesareunitedanddeservetobeheard!

Thankyouforyourconsideration

Jenny&JimBoyd





Page 638
Racelle Escolar

From: JoAnn Scellato Dunbar
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 6:32 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Chandler Blvd


Thefollowingquotedmessagereflectsmysentimentsprecisely.Pleasedon’tscrapetheplanstowidenChandler.

Thanksabunch.

JoAnnDunbar
Residentinthe






“Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a past board member and current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located
north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m
writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension
West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and
Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have
lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 1987 and was at the
public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the City’s master plan
which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the
Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar
screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project
will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!”
SentfrommyiPhone


Page 639
Racelle Escolar

From: John Cochran
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 2:48 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Zoning case GPA-AF-1-22-6


DearPlanningCommission,

MywifeandIwouldliketovoiceouroppositiontoBlandfordHome'sattempttochangethePhoenixGeneralPlanthat
wouldallowthemtoreduceChandlerBlvdfroma5lanearterialroadtoa3laneresidentialroad.

Webelievethatsincethisisnotapropertyrightissuethecommissiondecisionshouldbebasedonthequestion"DOES
THISBENEFITTHECOMMUNITY''.Whatseemsobvioustousistheburdenthisamendmentplacesonthe
existingcommunities(TheReserve,CalabreaandPromontory)aswellasBlandford'sfuturehomeownersis
disappropriatelyhigherthanthecostsavingsBlandfordhomeswillachievefromnothavingtobuildthe
additionalroadwaylanesandthelanditnolongerhastogranttowardstherightaway.

ThemainburdenthisplacesonthecommunityisaReductionintheabilityofpublicsafetytogettohomesina
reasonabletimeframe.Thiswillbecausedbyseveralfactors.Themostobviousreasoniscausedbythelowerspeed
limitsinaresidentialstreetversusanarterialroad.This,however,isnotthemostdangerousfactor.Thenarrow
roadwayattimeswillbecompletelyblockedfromaccidents,stalledvehicles,medicalemergenciesandroad
maintenancejusttonameafew.Becauseoftheuniquecircumstanceofhaving774residencesandanother150acres
yettobedevelopedthatarephysicallyboundedbyfreewaywallsandmountainsthereisonlyonewayinandoutof
thesecommunitiesandthiscanneverchange.Havingonlyonelaneinandonelaneoutwillbeadisaster.

Anotherburdenthenarrowroadcausesisincreaseddangertobikeriders.ChandlerBlvdisafavoriterouteforweekend
bikeriders.WhenPecosroadexistedwehadafourlanedividedhighwaywithlarge8'shouldersthatmanybikeriders
enjoyed.TodayalargeamountofbikeridersenjoyChandlerBlvd.Currentlymostdriverswhenpassingabikerider
moveintothecenterlaneinordertogivethebikeridersalargeberthwhichallowsadrivertosafelypassonebikerora
groupofthem.IfBlandfordHomesproposalisapprovedthiswillnolongerbethecase.Becausethecenterlanewillbe
usedforwhatitisdesignedfor,turningleftintotheBlandfordcommunity.Withfourlanesdriverswillchangeintothe
leftlanetoavoidconflict.

Anotherburdenthisplacesonthecommunityisnotnearasseriousbutneverthelessimportant.
Wehaveallatonetimeoranothercomplainedabouttraffic.Withjustonelaneoftravelforasmuchas3milesitonly
takes1eventtocauseamajorbackuponaRESIDENTIALSTREET.

Flawsintrafficstudy:ThetrafficcountmeasurementsweremadeoverayearagorightinthemiddleoftheDelta
variantoftheCovidpandemic.Becauseoftheinfluenceofthepandemicmanypeoplewerestillworkingfromhome
thusreducingtheactualtrafficcount.Wethinkanewtrafficcountshouldbetakentoupdatetomorerealistic
numbers.Thestudyalsofailedtoaddresstheapproximate150acresofundevelopedlandwestofBlandford's
community.Thetrafficengineerstatedbecausethisfuturedevelopmentisatleast5yearsouthecan'tincludethose
residencesinhiscount.Theproblemisthatbecauseoftheuniquecircumstanceswhereoncethisroadisbuiltitcannot
bechangedandnoothercanbeaddedhemustcountthesefuturehomes.Finally,thestudydidnotaddresstheLiberty
laneChandlerBlvdintersection.Thisundoubtedlywillbethesecondmostusedintersectioninthecommunity.We
thinkthestudyshouldbeamendedtoincludethisintersection.

Finally,WewanttobringupthefactthatthecitycommittedtothecommunitythatChandlerBlvdwouldbea
arterialroad.Thecityascommittedformorethan2decadesthruthegeneralplanthatthisroadwouldbeanarterial


Page 640
andthecommunityreliedonthisplan.Thenthecitycommittedagainin2016,inwritingandverballyduringthe
communitypresentationoftheChandlerBlvdthatADOTcommissionedPhoenixtobuildthatonceadeveloperbought
thestatelandthattheywouldberequiredtoputin2additionallanes.

WehopethatCityofPhoenixkeepstheircommitmentanddenyBlandfordHomesrequestforthegeneralplan
amendment.

Thanks,


ͲͲ

John Cochran

Calabrea HOA board member

3038 W. Briarwood Terrace

Phoenix, AZ 85045

602-694-2770/Phone







Page 641
Racelle Escolar

From: Karol Francis
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 7:17 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Concerns about Upper Canyon


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy, immediately to the west of Upper Canyon, the new Blandford Homes project is located west of
17th Avenue and north of Loop 202. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave
Chandler Boulevard West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at
Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard. I am also alarmed that there are no plans to build a fire station to
support the existing communities and the proposed new development.

I believe the traffic estimates conducted by Blandford Homes are deeply flawed. The City of Phoenix traffic
count dataset [mapping-phoenix.opendata.arcgis.com], last updated in January 2022, shows that the traffic on
Chandler Blvd was last counted in February 2016, long before the 202 Ed Pastor Freeway opened.
Furthermore, traffic on 17th Avenue was last counted in December 2014. Traffic patterns have changed
enormously with the opening of the 202 Freeway and the closing of Pecos Rd in this area. How could
Blandford possibly create an accurate traffic estimate with such wildly outdated traffic count data from the City
of Phoenix?

Furthermore, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have been
the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding
these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen
once development begins on the Upper Canyon project.

Lastly, the neighborhoods west of this project, including Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and Promontory, already
suffer from long 911 response times. The closest fire station to my home is 5 miles from my front door. To
meet the Phoenix Fire Department target response time of 4 minutes, a fire truck would need to travel 75mph
to my house (not including the time required to don gear and man the vehicle). In other words, 911 response
times to the existing communities are already inadequate, and will only become far worse after Upper Canyon
is built. We need a new fire station to support this area.

Thank you,

Karol Francis
2905 W. Windsong Dr
Phoenix AZ 85045

https://www.linkedin.com/in/karolfrancis/ [linkedin.com]





Page 642
From: Lori Wantland
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Blvd extension West of 17th ave
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 7:25:48 AM




Dear Planning Commission Members,

We are current residents of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north
and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes
project. We are writing to voice our opposition to the current proposal that would leave the
Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing
trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. We’ve lived in
Ahwatukee since 2002 and the east valley for over 40 years. We are aware of the public
meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the City’s
master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of
Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these
items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes
and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects of
these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured
hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three
neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, we’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot
wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once
development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Thanks,
Lori Wantland and Michael Mortensen




Page 643
From: Marty Dean
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: widening of chandler in my subdivision?
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 12:50:34 PM


Hello:

I bought this home in February 2022 and now I have the news about the widening of Chandler
Blvd ? I am not happy about this!! .

I am in opposition to this greedy method, City of Phoenix.Just to please a developer and add
more homes STOP AND THINK ABOUT ALL THE PEOPLE BEING AFFECTED.

Thank you

Martha Dean and family-Foothills Reserve
16607 South 27 Avenue
Phoenix , Az 85045




Page 644
From: Matt Francis
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: New Upper Canyon development
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:01:58 AM



Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and
south of Shaugnessy, immediately to the west of Upper Canyon, the new Blandford Homes
project is located west of 17th Avenue and north of Loop 202. I’m writing to voice my
opposition to the current proposal that would leave Chandler Boulevard West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and
Chandler Boulevard. I am also alarmed that there are no plans to build a fire station to
support the existing communities and the proposed new development.

I believe the traffic estimates conducted by Blandford Homes are deeply flawed. The City of
Phoenix traffic count dataset [mapping-phoenix.opendata.arcgis.com], last updated in
January 2022, shows that the traffic on Chandler Blvd was last counted in February 2016,
long before the 202 Ed Pastor Freeway opened. Furthermore, traffic on 17th Avenue was
last counted in December 2014. Traffic patterns have changed enormously with the
opening of the 202 Freeway and the closing of Pecos Rd in this area. How could Blandford
possibly create an accurate traffic estimate with such wildly outdated traffic count data from
the City of Phoenix?

Furthermore, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot
wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once
development begins on the Upper Canyon project.

Lastly, the neighborhoods west of this project, including Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and
Promontory, already suffer from long 911 response times. The closest fire station to my
home is 5 miles from my front door. To meet the Phoenix Fire Department target response
time of 4 minutes, a fire truck would need to travel 75mph to my house (not including the
time required to don gear and man the vehicle). In other words, 911 response times to the
existing communities are already inadequate, and will only become far worse after Upper
Canyon is built. We need a new fire station to support this area.

Thank you,

Matt Francis
2905 W. Windsong Dr



Page 645
Phoenix AZ 85045
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mattfrancisaz/ [linkedin.com]




Page 646
Racelle Escolar

From: Matt Shadle
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 12:27 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: OPPOSE Request to not widen Chandler Extension by Blandford


DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

IamacurrentresidentoftheFoothillsReserveHOA.FoothillsReserveislocatednorthandsouthofShaughnessey
immediatelyadjacenttothewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.

I'mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof
17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexistingtrailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calebrea,andnowPromotory)havelivedwith
brokenpromisesbytheCityfortoolong.TheCity'smasterplanhasforalongtimeincludedaFireStationWestof17th
AvenueaswellasalargeCityofPhoenixParkNorthoftheChandlerextension.

TheCity'splanfrom2015and2016showedthewideningoftheChandlerExtensionfromitscurrentonelane
configurationineachdirectiontotwolaneswithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.TheCityplanneditthiswayto
accommodatetheextratrafficfrom1000newhomesaswelladdedcapacityformoretimelyresponsesbyPolice,Fire
andEMTservices.

Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitheroftheseitemsseemtostillbeontheCity'sradarscreen.Theadditionofmorethan
1,000homesandadditionalresidentsintheBlandfordHomesprojectwillonlyworsentheeffectsofthesedelays.

WeneedbetteremergencyresponsetimesandnotwideningtheChandlerextensionwillputthatatgreaterrisk.
Blandfordjustdoesn’twanttopayforit.

Willyou,theplanningcommission,followthemasterplananddowhatisrightforthecityandtheAhwatukee
communityandrejectthisrequestfromBlandford?Orwillyouwilttopressurefromthedeveloper?

Pleasedowhatisrightforourcommunity!!

Thanks,
MattShadle

SentfrommyiPhone





Page 647
From: Paul Anderson
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Concerned homeowner in the Foothills Reserve - New Blandford Home Project and Road Widening
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 9:20:53 AM


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a longtime homeowner in Foothills Reserve community. Foothills Reserve is located
north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford
Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave
the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing
19th Avenue trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.
Foregoing the widening of this critical access road gives them the ability to build even more
homes in their proposed development on the South side of the Chandler Extension and
creates a traffic hazard.

The City’s plan from 2015 and 2016 showed the widening of the Chandler Extension from
its current one lane configuration in each direction to two lanes with bike lanes and a center
turning lane. The City planned it this way to accommodate the extra traffic from 1100 new
homes as well added capacity for more timely responses by Police, Fire and EMT
services. We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the
Chandler extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 2005 and have heard of the City’s master plan which included
a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the
Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on
the City’s radar screen. We need better emergency response times. Less than two years
ago, the Chandler extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter
landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency
access to our three neighborhoods.

I’d also like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot
wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once
development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Thank You,
Paul Anderson
2818 W. Wildwood Drive
Phoenix, AZ 85045


Paul V. Anderson MS, CIEC
Industrial Hygienist
Clark Seif Clark, Inc. (CSC)
7302 West Chicago Street, Chandler, AZ 85226
tel 480-460-8334 cel 602-757-1611 fax 480-460-8335
e-mail panderson@csceng.com
www.csceng.com [csceng.com]



Page 648
LOS ANGELES ~ LONG BEACH ~ SAN FRANCISCO ~ SAN DIEGO ~ PHOENIX, AZ ~ HARRODSBURG, KY

---PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL---


NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is intended only for the addressee. It contains information that may be privileged, confidential, and exempt
from disclosure under applicable law. Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this by anyone other than the addressee or the addressee's agent is
strictly prohibited. If this electronic mail transmission is received in error, please notify the sender immediately by a "reply to sender only" message and
destroy all electronic and hard copies of this communication and all attachments thereto. Thank you.




Page 649
From: Samuel Welty
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Planned widening of the Chandler Extension
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 1:06:37 PM



Dear Planning Commission Members,



We are current residents of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice
my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the Chandler extension expanded to two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center
turning lane as previously planned.

Please take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th Avenue and
Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have been the
subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding
these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only
worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.



Regards,



Samuel & Christine Welty

2752 W Cedarwood Ln

Phoenix, AZ 85045




Page 650
From: Sean Esway
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Blandford project and Chandler Blvd
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 8:48:25 AM


Hello- this is a concern for our neighborhood in the Foothills Reserve.
Please hear our concerns and our opinion desiring effort to have Blandford Homes and the city
agree to a widening of Chandler Blvd to accommodate fire and rescues and the traffic to come.
This build already looks to be too busy for the existing infrastructure.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee
since 1987 and was at the public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when
everyone was shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th
Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although
critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The
addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project
will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured
hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three
neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Sincerely,
Sean Esway local resident




Page 651
From: Shenita Thomas
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: council.district.6@phoenix.gov
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 8:43:27 AM


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and
south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes
project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the
Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing
trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now
Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee
since 1987 and was at the public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when
everyone was shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th
Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although
critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The
addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project
will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler
extension was shut down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured
hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three
neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler
extension as two lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the
intersections at 17th Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty
Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and
are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic lights cannot
wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once
development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard! Sent from my iPhone




Page 652
From: Weize Chen
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Re: Chandler Boulevard Widening
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2022 8:09:52 AM




Dear Planning Commission Members,

I have been a long time resident of the Foothills Reserve Master
Community since it was built 20 years ago. Foothills Reserve is located
north and south of Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the
new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the
current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West
of 17th Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop
sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve,
Calebrea, and now Promotory) have lived with broken promises by the City
for too long. I’ve lived in Foothills Reserve since 2002. We were told
long time ago that a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large
plan. Although critically needed, neither of these items has been
materialized yet. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional
residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects of
these delays.

We truly hope that the City sticks to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that
showed the Chandler extension as two lanes in each direction with bike
lanes and a center turning lane. Thank you very much!


Best regards,

Weize Chen

A Resident at the Foothills Reserve




Page 653
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: Concerned Homeowner



From:Malcolm&Karen
Sent:Friday,September2,20221:46PM
To:PDDPlanningCommission
Subject:ConcernedHomeowner

DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

IamacurrentresidentoftheFoothillsReserveHOA.FoothillsReserveislocatednorthandsouthofShaugnessy
immediatelyadjacenttothewestofthenewBlandfordHomesproject.I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrent
proposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexisting
trailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calebrea,andnowPromotory)havelivedwith
brokenpromisesbytheCityfortoolong.I’velivedinAhwatukeesince1987andwasatthepublicmeetingsattheGrace
Innnearly20yearsagowheneveryonewasshowntheCity’smasterplanwhichincludedaFireStationWestof17th
AvenueaswellasalargeCityofPhoenixParkNorthoftheChandlerextension.Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitherof
theseitemsseemtostillbeontheCity’sradarscreen.Theadditionofmorethan1,000homesandadditionalresidents
intheBlandfordHomesprojectwillonlyworsentheeffectsofthesedelays.

Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetimes.Lessthantwoyearsago,theChandlerextensionwasshutdowninboth
directionsforanEMThelicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffany
emergencyaccesstoourthreeneighborhoods.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineach
directionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Finally,I’dliketheCitytotakeamoreproactiveplanningandbudgetingroleontheintersectionsat17thAvenueand
ChandlerBoulevardaswellas17thAvenueandLibertyLane.Thesetwointersectionshavebeenthesubjectofarecent
increaseinaccidentsandareindesperateneedoftrafficcontrol.Thetimingofaddingthesetwotrafficlightscannot
waituntilthenewdevelopmentisnearcompletion.Thesituationwillonlyworsenoncedevelopmentbeginsonthe
statetrustlandwithanincreaseintrafficvolume.

Ourcommunitiesareunitedanddeservetobeheard!

Regards





Page 654
Racelle Escolar

From: Steve Neese
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2022 1:32 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: council.district6@phoenix.gov
Subject: Chandler Extension and Widening the Road as planned..


Whomitmayconcern,IliveintheFoothillsReserveneighborhoodShaughnessyRoadthisisjustwestoftheChandler
Boulevardextension.IamwritingbecauseIamconcernedaboutsomerumorsthatIhear,statingtherewillnotbeany
wideningoftheChandlerBoulevardextension

ThisconcernsmealotbecauseIhavehadmanyinstancesinthe15yearsthatIhavelivedherethatroadclosuresdueto
ablockageforeitherstreetmaintenance,repair,caraccident.whateveritmaybe,hasmadetravelontheChandler
extensiondifficult.

AndnowBlandfordHomesisgoingtobeadding1000moreresidencesseveralthousandmorevehiclesonthisroadthat
waspreviouslyplannedasa4laneroad.Ifthetwolaneconfigurationhasnotbeenadequate,howisseveralthousand
morevehiclesgoingmakethistwolaneconfigurationevenremotelysafe?

BlandfordshouldnothavePLANNEDtheircommunityiftheycannottakeonthePLANNEDwideningoftheroad.This
hasbeenonthePhoenixplanforyears.Shouldbenosurprisetothem..Theyjustwantmoreprofitstogototheirown
pockets..

I’mveryconcernedthattheemergencyresponseneedsofthecommunityarebeingjeopardizedifthisisnotwidened..
Myabilitytogettowork,getmysonortoschooltheseareallconcernsthatIfeelareinjeopardy.

Havingthissectionofroadwidenedneedstobeanumberonepriority.

Regards.

SteveNEESE
16018South29thAvenue
Phoenix,Arizona85045



SentfrommyiPhone





Page 655
Racelle Escolar

From: Valerie Godwin
Sent: Sunday, September 4, 2022 5:03 PM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Widening of the Chandler Extension


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaugnessy immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my
opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler
Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have
lived with broken promises by the City for too long. I’ve lived in Ahwatukee since 1987 and was at the
public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20 years ago when everyone was shown the City’s master plan
which included a Fire Station West of 17th Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the
Chandler extension. Although critically needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar
screen. The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project
will only worsen the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut
down in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain,
effectively sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!
ValerieGodwin
602Ͳ317Ͳ1176





Page 656
Racelle Escolar

From: Kurt Lindstrom
Sent: Monday, September 5, 2022 7:42 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Foothill Reserve HOA


DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

I’m a concerned homeowner in the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of
Shaughnessey immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice
my opposition to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th
Avenue unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaughnessey and Chandler
Blvd. 


The most important reason for widening Chandler Blvd between 17th Ave. and Shaughnessey is that we
need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut down
in both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain, effectively
sealing off any emergency access to our three neighborhoods. The addition of more than 1,000 homes
and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen traffic and further restrict
emergency access.

We also need the City to stick to its plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding traffic lights or “roundabouts” at these intersections cannot wait until the new development is
near completion. The situation will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an
increase in traffic volume.


Regards, 


Kurt Lindstrom


SentfrommyiPhone





Page 657
Racelle Escolar

From: Mike McDermott
Sent: Monday, September 5, 2022 6:08 AM
To: PDD Planning Commission; Council District 6 PCC
Subject: Chandler Boulevard Extension


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I own a home in the Foothills Reserve. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of Shaugnessy
immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition
to the current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue
unchanged between the existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have
lived with broken promises by the City for too long. Since the public meetings at the Grace Inn nearly 20
years ago when everyone was shown the City’s master plan which included a Fire Station West of 17th
Avenue as well as a large City of Phoenix Park North of the Chandler extension. Although critically
needed, neither of these items seem to still be on the City’s radar screen. The addition of more than 1,000
homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen the effects of these
delays.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two
lanes in each direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th
Avenue and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have
been the subject of a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing
of adding these two traffic lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation
will only worsen once development begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Thanks,
Mike McDermott





Page 658
Racelle Escolar

From: sarahsouthwoodevans
Sent: Monday, September 5, 2022 10:27 AM
To: Council District 6 PCC; PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Proposed extension of Chandlar Blvd


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I am a current resident of the Foothills Reserve HOA. Foothills Reserve is located north and south of Shaugnessy
immediately adjacent to the west of the new Blandford Homes project. I’m writing to voice my opposition to the
current proposal that would leave the Chandler Boulevard extension West of 17th Avenue unchanged between the
existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard.

The neighborhoods West of the State Trust Land (Foothills Reserve, Calebrea, and now Promotory) have lived with
broken promises by the City for too long.

The addition of more than 1,000 homes and additional residents in the Blandford Homes project will only worsen
the effects of these delays.

We need better emergency response times. Less than two years ago, the Chandler extension was shut down in
both directions for an EMT helicopter landing to aid an injured hiker on South Mountain, effectively sealing off any
emergency access to our three neighborhoods.

We need the City to stick to their plan from 2015 and 2016 that showed the Chandler extension as two lanes in each
direction with bike lanes and a center turning lane.

Finally, I’d like the City to take a more proactive planning and budgeting role on the intersections at 17th Avenue
and Chandler Boulevard as well as 17th Avenue and Liberty Lane. These two intersections have been the subject of
a recent increase in accidents and are in desperate need of traffic control. The timing of adding these two traffic
lights cannot wait until the new development is near completion. The situation will only worsen once development
begins on the state trust land with an increase in traffic volume.

Our communities are united and deserve to be heard!

Thank you for your consideration of the communities concerns.

Sarah Southwood-Evans

Sent with Proton Mail [proton.me] secure email.





Page 659
Racelle Escolar

From: CCandCM
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 8:31 PM
To: Council District 6 PCC
Cc: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Concern of not widening Chandler Blvd Extension (Ahwatukee)


Hello Mr. Diccio

Thank you for your service to our community and local government – we understand it is hard
work! Thank you Mr. Diccio.
Our family lives in the Foothills Reserve in Ahwatukee and so do my aging parents. Writing to express
our views on two things. Thank you for your consideration.



1) We heard that the builder to the south of the new-er extended Chandler Blvd is planning to not widen
the only road into our area, at the Foothills Reserve. Leaving the current road the same, between the
existing trailhead and the stop sign at Shaugnessy and Chandler Boulevard. The builder plans to build
over 1000 homes! This is very concerning, as the congestion already is there at certain times of the day
already. Weekly we see at least one car pass others in the middle “turn lane” as they are anxious to cross
this 1 mile stretch. I can only imagine how many accidents will occur with more traffic! As we have lived
here for 16 years, we saw the original plans, that the road would be made wider (to match the wider
bridges), and now hearing this may not occur is concerning. I'm concerned that in accident could fully
block the one road in or out of our community. This is a safety issue.
Please make sure the road is widened, for the safety of our area. Thank you!

2) The intersection of Liberty Lane and 17th Ave needs a stoplight, or speedbumps, or big white paint on
the street, or something to stop accidents. My parents were hit in an accident there that could have killed
them, when a car didn’t see the stop sign on Liberty Lane. Our neighbor across the street was also hit at
this exact same place, when a car went flying through the stop sign at Liberty Lane – totaling his car, he
was in a cast for months, and if his wife would have been in the passenger seat – she would have been
killed. This road (Liberty Lane) as it crosses 17th Ave is very deceiving, as it looks like it continues (if a
person doesn’t see the stop sign). We see at least 1 accident here a month. Please have a
speedbump/s, a blinking red light or something to alert drivers that 17th Ave is there, and they have to
stop. It will save lives.

Thank you for your action and attention to this – we almost lost our neighbor and my parents.



Thank you!

Craig and Cristina Carter and Family

(Craig Cell: 480-257-9613)





Page 660
Racelle Escolar

From: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: FW: road widening



From:JoelGoga
Sent:Wednesday,September7,20226:57AM
To:PDDPlanningCommission;CouncilDistrict6PCC
Subject:roadwidening

DearPlanningCommissionMembers,

I’mwritingtovoicemyoppositiontothecurrentproposalthatwouldleavetheChandlerBoulevardextensionWestof
17thAvenueunchangedbetweentheexistingtrailheadandthestopsignatShaugnessyandChandlerBoulevard.

TheneighborhoodsWestoftheStateTrustLand(FoothillsReserve,Calebrea,andnowPromotory)havelivedwith
brokenpromisesbytheCityfortoolong.I’velivedinAhwatukeesince1987andwasatthepublicmeetingsattheGrace
Innnearly20yearsagowheneveryonewasshowntheCity’smasterplanwhichincludedaFireStationWestof17th
AvenueaswellasalargeCityofPhoenixParkNorthoftheChandlerextension.Althoughcriticallyneeded,neitherof
theseitemsseemtostillbeontheCity’sradarscreen.Theadditionofmorethan1,000homesandadditionalresidents
intheBlandfordHomesprojectwillonlyworsentheeffectsofthesedelays.

Weneedbetteremergencyresponsetimes.Lessthantwoyearsago,theChandlerextensionwasshutdowninboth
directionsforanEMThelicopterlandingtoaidaninjuredhikeronSouthMountain,effectivelysealingoffany
emergencyaccesstoourthreeneighborhoods.

WeneedtheCitytosticktotheirplanfrom2015and2016thatshowedtheChandlerextensionastwolanesineach
directionwithbikelanesandacenterturninglane.

Finally,I’dliketheCitytotakeamoreproactiveplanningandbudgetingroleontheintersectionsat17thAvenueand
ChandlerBoulevardaswellas17thAvenueandLibertyLane.Thesetwointersectionshavebeenthesubjectofarecent
increaseinaccidentsandareindesperateneedoftrafficcontrol.Thetimingofaddingthesetwotrafficlightscannot
waituntilthenewdevelopmentisnearcompletion.Thesituationwillonlyworsenoncedevelopmentbeginsonthe
statetrustlandwithanincreaseintrafficvolume.

Ourcommunitiesareunitedanddeservetobeheard!





Page 661



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Consideration of Citizen Petition Related to the Phoenix Police Department

This report provides the City Council with information in response to a citizen petition
submitted by Kim Baker at the Sept. 21, 2022 Formal City Council meeting regarding
the Phoenix Police Department (Attachment A).

Summary
The petitioner requests the City Council to direct the City Manager's Office to
investigate the full dereliction of duty by the Phoenix Police Department concerning
"Complaint Report #20210001645266, Bias Hate Crime."

A similar request was submitted by Kim Baker at the Aug. 31, 2022 Formal City
Council Meeting (Attachment B). The Law Department determined that the request
was not a qualified citizen petition. Mr. Baker returned and submitted another citizen
petition on Sept. 21, 2022 and the Law Department determined that it was a qualified
citizen petition. A staff response dated Sept. 20, 2022 was included in the Sept. 22,
2022 General Information Packet (Attachment C) and emailed to Mr. Baker on Sept.
23, 2022, in response to his Aug. 31, 2022 request.

Options for Council Action
A. Direct the City Manager's Office to research this request consistent with the citizen
petition dated Sept. 21, 2022.
B. Take no further action on the petition.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.




Page 662
Attachment A




Page 663
Page 664
Page 665
Page 666
Page 667
Page 668
Page 669
Attachment B




Page 670
Page 671
Page 672
Page 673
Page 674
Attachment C




To: Jeri L. Williams Date: September 20, 2022
Police Chief

From: Warren Brewer, Commander
Violent Crimes Bureau

Subject: MR. KIM BAKER THREATS REPORT/INCIDENT 2021-1645266

This memorandum is being generated to document the investigation regarding incident
#2021-1645266, a bias motivated threats case which occurred at the Lovecraft restaurant located
at 3128 E. Cactus Road. The victim, Kim Baker, reported that after finishing his shift at the above
listed address he returned to his vehicle, which was parked on the property, and found a note
under the windshield wiper. Mr. Baker drove to a different location, removed the note and found it
contained a threat stating, “you dead n*****.” Mr. Baker contacted Phoenix Police to report the
threat, and the below timeline documents the investigative steps completed.

October 21, 2021 – Officer Vaden #10737 responded to 1550 E. Thunderbird Road and contacted
Mr. Baker. The officer learned that Mr. Baker called Phoenix Police the night before; however,
after an extended wait, he left the area and made a call from his home. Officer Vaden authored an
original report outlining the threatening note left on Mr. Baker’s vehicle and he impounded the note.
The note was created using cut out letters to spell out the threat. When asked about a possible
suspect, Mr. Baker states it may be related to information regarding a missing 10-year-old girl he
shared with media and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

October 23, 2021 – Officer Vaden authored a supplement describing an email she received from
Mr. Baker. In the email, Mr. Baker stated that his boss, Ryan Castillo, said the cameras at the
Lovecraft restaurant do not cover the area his vehicle was parked in. Therefore, no surveillance
video is available showing who left the note on Mr. Baker’s vehicle.

October 27, 2021 – Detective Collins #8813 was assigned the case and began his investigation.
On the same date, he took a photograph of the impounded note. Detective Collins also responded
to the scene of the incident and to take overall photographs of the area. He also canvassed the
area looking for additional video surveillance cameras. The detective contacted three adjacent
businesses to inquire about surveillance cameras, a floral shop, It’s all Goodz Smoke Shop and
the Lovecraft restaurant. The cameras for each of the businesses did not record the area of the
parking lot where Mr. Baker’s vehicle was parked.

October 27, 2021 – Detective Collins submitted a forensic lab request for latent fingerprints and
DNA analysis for the impounded note.

October 27, 2021 – Detective Collins spoke with Mr. Baker over the telephone and learned that Mr.
Baker believes a private investigator, David Carlson, who no longer wishes to work with him may
have information regarding the note left on his vehicle. Mr. Baker does not believe Mr. Carlson is
the suspect; however, Mr. Baker believes Mr. Carlson may know who left the note.




Page 675
October 28, 2021 – Detective Collins responded to Mr. Baker’s residence to collect exclusionary
buccal swabs. Detective Collins also contacted the owner of the parking lot where Mr. Baker’s
vehicle was parked at the time of the incident. The owner confirmed that all video footage from the
property had been made available to Detective Collins, and the footage does not capture the area
where Mr. Baker’s vehicle was parked on the day of the incident.

October 28, 2021 – Detective Collins contacted an employee at the Arco Gas Station, located at
12222 N. 32nd Street, where Mr. Baker said he waited for police contact. Detective Collins
watched footage from October 21, 201 and observed Mr. Baker waiting for police contact.

October 28, 2021 – Detective Collins received emails from Mr. Baker which contained text
messages that Mr. Baker sent to Mr. Carlson.

October 29, 2021 – Detective Collins received an email from Mr. Baker which contained a Zoom
meeting invitation to Mr. Baker, possibly from Nicole Grigg at ABC 15. When Detective Collins
inquired as to the purpose of this meeting, Mr. Baker stated that the meeting was cancelled.

November 1, 2021 – Detective Collins contacted a representative of Arco to collect the
surveillance footage. However, the representative was unable to download the footage.
A representative of Its all Goodz Smoke Shop also informed Detective Collins the video
footage was not available.

November 1, 2021 – Detective Collins spoke with Private Investigator, David Carlson. Mr. Carlson
denied speaking to anyone regarding his conversations with Mr. Baker or having knowledge of
who may have left the note on Mr. Baker’s vehicle. He told Detective Collins that due to a conflict
of interest, he declined to work as a private investigator for Mr. Baker. Mr. Carlson also stated that
he had not spoken with Mr. Baker for several weeks.

November 2, 2021 – Detective Collins responded to the Arco with Forensic Imaging Unit personnel
and was able to obtain the surveillance footage from October 21, 2021.

November 8, 2021 – Detective Collins received an email from Ryan Castillo, the owner of
Lovecraft restaurant. The email contained a statement describing what Mr. Baker told him
regarding the missing juvenile case and the threatening note found on his truck. Mr. Castillo again
confirmed that the surveillance cameras did not capture the area of the parking lot where the
victim’s vehicle was parked.

Detective Collins has completed all reasonable investigative steps regarding this incident. He has
exhausted all known leads and submitted a lab request for the impounded note. The case is
currently considered an ongoing investigation in a Pended Status awaiting processing of the note
by the Phoenix Police Crime Lab.

9/13/2022 – Please forward through the chain of command and provide to Mr. Baker reference his
Citizen Request for Information.


9/13/2022 – Detective Collins has completed a thorough investigation and exhausted all leads. If
additional information is learned in the future, investigators will conduct follow-up in an effort to
successfully resolve this investigation. Mr. Baker’s complaint to City Council will be documented in
a Blue Team incident and Mr. Baker will be sent a letter documenting our findings.




Page 676



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO ADD-ON (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Phoenix Park Ranger
Program

On Oct. 10, 2022 Councilwoman Ann O'Brien, Councilman Jim Waring, Councilwoman
Debra Stark and Councilman Sal DiCiccio submitted a request (Attachment A) to the
City Manager to place an item on the Oct. 12, 2022 Formal City Council agenda. The
request is for the City Council to consider a vote to immediately place additional
security services in the Phoenix park system. The item titled Phoenix Park Ranger
Update was originally scheduled for discussion and possible action by the Community
and Cultural Investment Subcommittee on Oct. 5, 2022 and was withdrawn
(Attachment B).

This request is in compliance with Rule 2(c) of the Rules of Council Proceedings.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton.




Page 677
Attachment A




Page 678
Page 679
Page 680
Page 681
Page 682
Page 683

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

88 item(s)