Meeting Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee-5/11/2022 complete
2022-05-11 · Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee
Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee
Item text
Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of June 24, 2020, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.
The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 15
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.
Page 16
ATTACHMENT A
To: City Council Date: May 11, 2022
From: Mayor Kate Gallego
Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES
The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:
Central City Village Planning Committee
I recommend the following for appointment:
Cyndy Gaughan
Ms. Gaughan is a Senior Director at Phoenix Community Alliance and a resident of
District 4. She fills a vacancy to expire November 19, 2023.
Development Advisory Board
I recommend the following for appointment:
Christopher Kowalsky
Mr. Kowalsky is a Special Projects Administrator in the City of Phoenix Street
Transportation Department and will serve as the department’s ex-officio representative.
Environmental Quality and Sustainability Commission
I recommend the following for appointment as Chair:
Caroline Lobo
Ms. Lobo will replace Colin Tetreault as Chair for a term to expire May 11, 2023.
Page 17
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
Councilwoman Debra Stark recommends the following for appointment:
Marc Soronson
Mr. Soronson is a Vice President at HDR and a resident of District 2. He fills a vacancy
for a partial term to expire November 19, 2022.
Sister Cities Commission
I recommend the following for appointment:
Oscar De las salas
Mr. De las salas is a Design Manager at Gensler and a resident of District 5. He fills a
vacancy for a term to expire May 11, 2025.
Page 18
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189231.
Summary
Applicant
Katie Farley, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
7015 E. Mayo Blvd.
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 2
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently under construction with plans to open in November 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 16, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
Page 19
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“LGO Hospitality has been providing local community restaurants in the Phoenix valley
for almost two decades. Locations include Chelsea's Kitchen and La Grande Orange,
staples of the phoenix community.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“LGO Hospitality has also put its guests and the community first. Ingo's Tasty Food will
provide high quality food and service to all guests as a family friendly restaurant.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Buck & Rider
Liquor License Map - Buck & Rider
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 20
Liquor License Data: BUCK & RIDER
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 7 5
Liquor Store 9 1 1
Hotel 11 1 1
Restaurant 12 22 17
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 0.21 0
Violent Crimes 9.65 0.10 0
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 1
Total Violations 94 2
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
2168442 1681 50 % 43 % 4%
2168452 694 23 % 38 % 8%
6152001 1993 8% 29 % 12 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 21
Liquor License Map: BUCK & RIDER
7015 E MAYO BLVD
Ü
Date: 4/1/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 22
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189234.
Summary
Applicant
Katie Farley, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
7025 E. Mayo Blvd.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently under construction with plans to open in November 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 16, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
Page 23
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“LGO Hospitality has been providing local community restaurants in the Phoenix valley
for almost two decades. Locations include Chelsea's Kitchen and La Grande Orange,
staples of the phoenix community.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“LGO Hospitality has also put its guest and the community first. Ingo's Tasty Food will
provide high quality food and service to all guests as a family friendly restaurant.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Ingo's Tasty Food
Liquor License Map - Ingo's Tasty Food
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 24
Liquor License Data: INGO'S TASTY FOOD
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 7 5
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 1 1
Hotel 11 1 1
Restaurant 12 25 20
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 0.21 0
Violent Crimes 9.65 0.10 0
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 3
Total Violations 94 5
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
2168442 1681 50 % 43 % 4%
2168452 694 23 % 38 % 8%
6152001 1993 8% 29 % 12 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 25
Liquor License Map: INGO'S TASTY FOOD
7025 E MAYO BLVD
Ü
Date: 3/21/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 26
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189176 and 189176S.
Summary
Applicant
Larry Allison, Agent
License Type
Series 10 and 10S - Beer and Wine Store with Sampling Privileges
Location
13610 N. Scottsdale Road, Ste. 14
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2
This request is for a new liquor license for a beer and wine store with sampling
privileges. This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have
an interim permit. This business is currently being remodeled with plans to open in
June 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 16, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 27
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have over 25 years management and executive experience in the food, beverage &
hospitality industry. I have a great passion for what I do and understand fully the
responsibilities of holding a liquor license. In those 25 years I have never run afoul of
any regulatory agencies or violated any laws, I understand fully the impact I have on
my community.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Because of my passion, profesionalism and experience. The literal translation of Mise
En Place is 'to gather'. I wish to create a small place where the community can gather
and through tasting events learn about the great wines of the world."
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Mise En Place
Liquor License Map - Mise En Place
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 28
Liquor License Data: MISE EN PLACE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Producer 1 1 0
Wholesaler 4 5 0
Bar 6 1 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 3
Hotel 11 1 0
Restaurant 12 24 12
Craft Distiller 18 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 0.05 0
Violent Crimes 9.65 0 0
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 33
Total Violations 94 52
Page 29
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1032071 1171 81 % 2% 3%
1032072 1401 93 % 2% 0%
1032201 1364 95 % 15 % 3%
1032202 513 51 % 32 % 4%
2168161 1812 95 % 0% 4%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 30
Liquor License Map: MISE EN PLACE
13610 N SCOTTSDALE ROAD
Ü
Date: 3/21/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 31
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189043.
Summary
Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
7077 E. Bell Road, Ste. 110
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 15, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Page 32
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We train all our staff in responsible liquor service and conduct regular audits to ensure
they comply."
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We would like the ability to offer our patrons of legal age, an adult beverage with their
meal if they choose to have one."
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Uncle Bear's Grill and Tap
Liquor License Map - Uncle Bear's Grill and Tap
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 33
Liquor License Data: UNCLE BEAR'S GRILL AND TAP
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 4 0
Beer and Wine Bar 7 6 4
Liquor Store 9 1 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 7 3
Hotel 11 3 1
Restaurant 12 48 18
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 0.26 0
Violent Crimes 9.65 0.10 0
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 12
Total Violations 94 17
Page 34
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1032191 834 44 % 30 % 13 %
1032192 1054 84 % 16 % 2%
1032193 1262 88 % 14 % 8%
2168161 1812 95 % 0% 4%
2168452 694 23 % 38 % 8%
6152001 1993 8% 29 % 12 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 35
Liquor License Map: UNCLE BEAR'S GRILL AND TAP
7077 E BELL RD
Ü
Date: 3/21/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 36
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189222.
Summary
Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
12005 N. Tatum Blvd., Ste. 12
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 16, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 37
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
"We train all of our staff in responsible liquor service and conduct regular audits to
ensure they comply.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We would like the ability to offer our patrons of legal age, an adult beverage with their
meal if they choose to have one.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Maguey Cocina Mex
Liquor License Map - Maguey Cocina Mex
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 38
Liquor License Data: MAGUEY COCINA MEX
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 0
Bar 6 3 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 4 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2
Hotel 11 1 1
Restaurant 12 25 16
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 4.11 7.43
Violent Crimes 9.65 0.79 1.06
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 21
Total Violations 94 32
Page 39
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1032052 1192 82 % 0% 16 %
1032081 1605 97 % 10 % 12 %
1032082 1548 38 % 36 % 18 %
1032083 885 93 % 10 % 0%
1032091 804 74 % 0% 24 %
1032092 970 69 % 24 % 27 %
1032106 886 23 % 22 % 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 40
Liquor License Map: MAGUEY COCINA MEX
12005 N TATUM BLVD
Ü
Date: 3/21/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 41
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189718.
Summary
Applicant
Aaron Schofield, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
1502 W. Thomas Road
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 20, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 42
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Well known in the Phoenix community it was an exisisting business our landlord sold
from underneath us so we moved. We were loved by downtown Phoenix and as a
person I know I hold the trait and have great responsibility. We never had any issues at
our last location.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are a positive community space, and the people who come in are just as great as
the shop. We influence positivity, responsible and are viewed as a safe space to all
who come in.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Luanas Coffee & Beer
Liquor License Map - Luanas Coffee & Beer
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 43
Liquor License Data: LUANAS COFFEE & BEER
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Government 5 3 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 2
Liquor Store 9 3 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 5 1
Restaurant 12 8 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 204.14 0.95
Violent Crimes 9.65 40.36 1.59
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 90
Total Violations 94 146
Page 44
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1104001 1724 53 % 6% 33 %
1104002 778 35 % 16 % 12 %
1104003 1439 74 % 7% 37 %
1104004 1344 49 % 16 % 20 %
1105013 824 16 % 17 % 40 %
1118003 996 65 % 15 % 4%
1119001 678 96 % 8% 4%
1168002 1902 64 % 9% 20 %
1170001 2247 42 % 14 % 25 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 45
Liquor License Map: LUANAS COFFEE & BEER
1502 W THOMAS RD
Ü
Date: 3/22/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 46
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 190956.
Summary
Applicant
Theresa Morse, Agent
License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store
Location
7355 W. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5
This request is for a new liquor license for a beer and wine store. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales. This business is currently being
remodeled with plans to open in August 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 28, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 47
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owner has experience owning and managing companies and working with the
public. All employees, owner and manager will attend certified liquor law training to
ensure no sales are made to underage or obviously intoxicated customers. The
owner's primary purpose is to provide fresh butchered meat and other household
commodities to the neighborhood. Many residents in the area walk to the store
therefore, this location will be convenient as opposed to taking a bus to shop at big box
stores.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The owners have selected this existing store to allow customers to purchase beer or
wine along with convenience items and a fresh butcher shop. The license allows
sealed package beer/wine as well as other grocery items. The owners are mindful of
the community and they support their cause to abide by all laws and participate in
community action. The issuance of this license is in the best interest of the
community."
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Carniceria Mi Guadalajara
Liquor License Map - Carniceria Mi Guadalajara
Page 48
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 49
Liquor License Data: CARNICERIA MI GUADALAJARA
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 1 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0
Liquor Store 9 4 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 9 4
Restaurant 12 5 3
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 1.35 2.44
Violent Crimes 9.65 2.73 3.07
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 295
Total Violations 94 560
Page 50
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1096021 1392 71 % 14 % 35 %
1096022 3064 27 % 20 % 41 %
1096023 1946 79 % 0% 22 %
1096031 852 79 % 11 % 3%
1096034 1269 66 % 0% 17 %
1097012 1978 48 % 28 % 49 %
1097014 2074 0% 17 % 37 %
1097031 1232 68 % 0% 29 %
1097032 1653 33 % 12 % 31 %
1097041 1602 68 % 5% 35 %
1097042 784 71 % 19 % 15 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 51
Liquor License Map: CARNICERIA MI GUADALAJARA
7355 W INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Ü
Date: 3/30/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 52
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 163225.
Summary
Applicant
Sandra Ochoa, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
1327 E. Chandler Blvd., Ste. 108
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 24, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 53
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Im a non drinker, very responsable and reliable person, with over 15 years of
management experience, 7 of them in the restaurant business. Im knowledgeable of
the liquor rules, laws, and regulations. and have had no issues implementing them.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are a family owned and operated restaurant and we love our community. We are
not only serving food, but extending our family with all of our clientele. We are
Passioned obout serving delish food and create a great Family environment for the
community.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - El Fogon Taqueria
Liquor License Map - El Fogon Taqueria
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 54
Liquor License Data: EL FOGON TAQUERIA
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Liquor Store 9 2 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 2 2
Restaurant 12 4 4
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 0.21 0.74
Violent Crimes 9.65 0.13 0.21
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 4
Total Violations 94 7
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1167251 1132 95 % 7% 10 %
1167252 728 29 % 39 % 0%
1167253 1407 89 % 0% 11 %
1167272 1344 95 % 15 % 0%
1167281 1267 97 % 2% 4%
1167283 1145 97 % 3% 6%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 55
Liquor License Map: EL FOGON TAQUERIA
1327 E CHANDLER BLVD
Ü
Date: 3/28/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 56
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189375.
Summary
Applicant
Camila Alarcon, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
5813 N. 7th St., Ste. 140
Zoning Classification: R3, C-2, P-1
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 17, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 57
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant's members operate a successful microbrewery and restaurant in Colorado.
The Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards with respect to all
Arizona liquor laws and regulations and will ensure proper training of managers and
staff on the same.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Applicant is opening this restaurant in Arizona as an expansion of its seltzer-focused
restaurant and brain in Colorado. The restaurant complements the other
establishments currently operating in the area and provides a unique dining option to
the surrounding community.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Elevated Seltzer
Liquor License Map - Elevated Seltzer
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 58
Liquor License Data: ELEVATED SELTZER
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 2 0
Bar 6 7 3
Beer and Wine Bar 7 10 1
Liquor Store 9 6 3
Beer and Wine Store 10 7 1
Restaurant 12 44 18
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 242.09 1.69
Violent Crimes 9.65 36.94 1.06
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 49
Total Violations 94 71
Page 59
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1065012 1594 61 % 18 % 32 %
1065023 919 56 % 15 % 10 %
1066002 2064 83 % 7% 5%
1075001 758 80 % 2% 3%
1075002 1458 74 % 7% 15 %
1076011 319 65 % 16 % 46 %
1076012 904 38 % 24 % 23 %
1076013 1748 38 % 8% 17 %
1076021 1311 82 % 0% 6%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 60
Liquor License Map: ELEVATED SELTZER
5813 N 7TH ST
Ü
Date: 3/22/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 61
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 19-013070001508.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent
License Type
Series 19 - Remote Tasting Room for an existing Farm Winery
Location
3619 E. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6
This request is for a new liquor license for a Remote Tasting Room for an existing
Farm Winery. This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have
an interim permit. This business has plans to open in July 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 20, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 62
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Six Byrd Cider (Series 13)
941 S. Park Lane, Ste. 105, Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The applicant seeks to operate a tasting room for its products, providing a casual
eating and drinking experience that showcases the range of effervescent, hard apple
ciders produced locally by the company. It's ciders will be offered with a variety of
appetizers, small bites, and entrees made from locally sourced, market fresh
ingredients. The company's goal is to provide a unique, dynamic, and engaging tasting
room experience that demonstrates the creativity and versatility of its wine-making
craft with the best local, southwestern ingredients.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Six Byrd Cider
Liquor License Map - Six Byrd Cider
Page 63
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 64
Liquor License Data: SIX BYRD CIDER
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Bar 6 6 3
Beer and Wine Bar 7 7 1
Liquor Store 9 2 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 9 2
Restaurant 12 41 15
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 4.29 8.49
Violent Crimes 9.65 1.59 1.59
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 78
Total Violations 95 117
Page 65
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1082003 1225 76 % 13 % 17 %
1083021 1229 70 % 16 % 3%
1083022 1824 50 % 13 % 4%
1109011 665 96 % 10 % 13 %
1109012 2669 23 % 19 % 27 %
1109021 2609 33 % 21 % 40 %
1109022 2224 39 % 7% 18 %
1110001 781 25 % 11 % 3%
1110002 1105 63 % 8% 19 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 66
Liquor License Map: SIX BYRD CIDER
3619 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
Date: 3/24/2022
City Clerk Department
Page 67
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070123S.
Summary
Applicant
Simon Isaac, Agent
License Type
Series 9S - Addition of Sampling Privileges for a Liquor Store
Location
722 W. Southern Ave.
Zoning Classification: R1-6 and C-2
Council District: 7
This request is for the addition of Sampling Privileges to an existing liquor license for a
liquor store. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 21, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 68
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Paradise Liquor Mini Mart (Series 9)
722 W. Southern Ave., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 13
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
"The corporation has owned the Liquor Store License at the location since 2008 and
there have been no violations of the Arizona liquor laws or regulations. The sampling
area will be separately located within the licensed premises, opened product will be
kept locked, patrons will not be charged for sampling, wholesalers will conduct the
sampling and accurate records of sampling will be retained, all as prescribed by A.RS.
Section 4-203(K)."
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"The granting of sampling privileges will benefit the patrons of the business by allowing
them to try alcohol products with which they might not otherwise be familiar.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Paradise Liquor Mini Mart
Liquor License Map - Paradise Liquor Mini Mart
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 69
012345ÿ01789 8ÿ ÿ ÿ0ÿÿ
012345ÿ01789 8
8 751149 8518 ÿ18 ÿ18
!" # $ %
&&"ÿ!()ÿ*+(&ÿ!" , - %
.+/01"ÿ231"& 4 , -
&&"ÿ!()ÿ*+(&ÿ231"& $% $5 -
6&73!0"!(3 $- 5 %
85198ÿ
8 751149 :85;8ÿ< ÿ18ÿ:85;8ÿ<< ÿ18ÿ:85;8<<<
="1>&"3?ÿ@"+A&7 5$BC5 -%#BC- DBD4
E+1F&(3ÿ@"+A&7 4B#5 C-B%D -B#5
G@+3?H+)&ÿ!I&"!J&ÿ>&"ÿ7/0!"&ÿA+F&ÿGGKI&"!J&ÿ>&"ÿ7/0!"&ÿA+F&ÿH+3L+(ÿ$ÿA+F&ÿ"!)+07ÿGGGKI&"!J&ÿ>&"ÿ7/0!"&ÿA+F&ÿH+3L+(ÿMÿA+F&ÿ"!)+07
5485NÿO14 149ÿ
8 751149 :85;8 ÿ18ÿ:85;8
=!"P&F7ÿHQE+1F!3+1(7 5C $%4
R13!FÿE+1F!3+1(7 4C $C4
Page 70
012343ÿ6787ÿ9 ÿ86ÿ 1ÿ 43
4 6787ÿ4 2 21ÿ41 1312ÿ 2 1323ÿ2ÿ1
!"" #$%& $ ÿ( !ÿ( #)ÿ(
!"") #")& ÿ( #"ÿ( ))ÿ(
%"# %! )ÿ( !ÿ( *!ÿ(
%"## )$ *!ÿ( !ÿ( #*ÿ(
$ "" !!% $$ÿ( #ÿ( #!ÿ(
$$"# *$& $$ÿ( "ÿ( ) ÿ(
+,-./0- $ÿ( )ÿ( &ÿ(
Page 71
Liquor License Map: PARADISE LIQUOR MINI MART
722 W SOUTHERN AVE
Ü
Date: 3/23/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 72
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 189017.
Summary
Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent
License Type
Series 6 - Bar
Location
101 N. 1st Ave., Ste. 160
Zoning Classification: DTC - Downtown Business Core
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a bar. This location was previously licensed
for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 15, 2022.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 73
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Sip Coffee & Beer Garage (Series 12)
3620 E. Indian School Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 2
Liquor license violations: In January 2019, a fine of $250 was paid for bottle reuse or
refilling prohibited.
Brat Haus (Series 12)
3622 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: In March 2019, a fine of $625 was paid for no managers
agreement form on file, employee consuming on duty, drinking contests, delivering
more than law allows, and knowledge of liquor laws and rules.
Sip Coffee & Brew House (Series 12)
3617 N. Goldwater Blvd., Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owners currently operates two other establishments in the Phoenix/Scottsdale
area. He will continue to abide by Title 4 liquor laws.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location had a license previously. We would like to continue to offer the
downtown area a place to sit down and enjoy the environment with a drink.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
Page 74
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Rose Garden Cocktail Lounge
Liquor License Map - Rose Garden Cocktail Lounge
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 75
Liquor License Data: ROSE GARDEN COCKTAIL LOUNGE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 4 1
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 9 4
Bar 6 44 29
Beer and Wine Bar 7 14 6
Liquor Store 9 2 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 13 2
Hotel 11 7 5
Restaurant 12 93 46
Club 14 3 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 51.45 971.12 2150.31
Violent Crimes 9.65 215.92 509.34
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 54 45
Total Violations 94 92
Page 76
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1129002 815 37 % 22 % 24 %
1129003 1372 4% 18 % 40 %
1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
1143011 1389 22 % 15 % 57 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 77
Liquor License Map: ROSE GARDEN COCKTAIL LOUNGE
101 N 1ST AVE
Ü
Date: 3/21/2022
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 78
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
AZ
Request for a Class B Bingo License.
Summary
State law requires City Council approval before a State Bingo License can be issued.
Bingo License Types
Class A - gross receipts shall not exceed $15,600 per year
Class B - gross receipts shall not exceed $300,000 per year
Class C - anticipated gross receipts may exceed $300,000 per year
Applicant
Terry Foss
Location
20001 N. Cave Creek Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 79
PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-48551) (Items 16-33)
Ordinance S-48551 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code Section 42-13.
16 CentralSquare Technologies, LLC
For $72,946.74 in payment authority to purchase support and
maintenance for the accounts receivable system, Respond Billing, which
is utilized by the Emergency Transportation Services section for the
Phoenix Fire Department. The one-time purchase of annual support and
maintenance will allow for continued technical support and system
updates to ensure that emergency transportation related revenue owed to
the City of Phoenix is recovered without interruption.
17 Helmet Center LLC
For $24,000.00 in additional payment authority for Contract 149247 for
motorcycle helmets for the Police Department. The Traffic Bureau
replaces helmets every three years due to the daily use. The helmets
provide motor officers with face protection, in the event of a collision and
eye protection from road debris and other particles. The helmet protection
is imperative as the motorcycles used for training do not have
windshields.
18 Solari, Inc.
For $75,000.00 in payment authority for on-site mental health expert
services for the Police Department. The Phoenix Police Department's
Page 80
Communications Bureau will use a crisis response network, for on-site
professional experts to coach and guide 911 operators while receiving
emergency calls. The availability of a mental health expert on-site is one
of the possible efforts to increase opportunities for callers with behavioral
health issues to obtain the appropriate help needed when calling 911.
19 Arizona Glass and Door, LLC
For $32,945.00 in payment authority to purchase security window film for
the Library Department. The 6 mm clear security window film is being
bought for the entire Palo Verde Library building, covering a total of 2,278
square feet, on both the outside and inside of the windows. The funds will
support the Phoenix Strategic Plan, under the study area of
Neighborhoods and Livability; with the priority of, providing accessibility
and quality library systems to Phoenix residents; with the strategy to,
design, build, and maintain signature facilities that are accessible to all
residents.
20 Arizona Blue Stake, Inc., doing business as Arizona 811
For $35,000.00 in payment authority for Contract 134365 to pay annual
membership fees for the Public Transit Department. The funds will be
used for the contract to identify underground utilities, from July 1, 2022,
through June 30, 2027. The membership is required by State law and is
needed in order to continue locating and marking City underground
facilities before disturbance of earth surface.
21 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
For $150,000.00 in payment authority for reimbursement to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for oversight of the 19th
Avenue Landfill for the Public Works Department. The payment request is
necessary for the City to pay costs to the USEPA for compliance review
and site inspections for the annual regulatory oversight process and the
Five-Year Review.
22 Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., doing business as Republic
Media, The Arizona Republic, AZ Business Gazette
For $20,000.00 in payment authority to purchase Industrial Pretreatment
Program Significant Noncompliance and Pretreatment Settlement
Agreement publications for the Water Services Department. The
Page 81
publications are mandatory public notices that inform residents of
industries that are in significant noncompliance with the Industrial
Pretreatment program standards.
23 Arizona Department of Health Services
For $20,000.00 in payment authority for State of Arizona regulatory
laboratory license fees for the Water Services Department. The City is
required to pay an annual renewal fee to maintain the Water Services
laboratory compliance testing licensure and comply with State and
Federal regulations. Valid licensure is required for the laboratory to
perform regulatory compliance testing.
24 State of Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
For $225,000.00 in annual payment authority for Fiscal Year 2022-23
permit fees and permit renewal fees for the Water Services Department.
The funds will be used for annual operating permits, hazardous waste
permits, quarterly disposal fees for all Water Services Department
wastewater and water facilities, fees for acceptance and review of
required compliance reports, fees for inspection of facilities for
compliance with regulations, and fees for document review of paperwork
necessary to make changes to permits.
25 Regents of the University of California doing business
as University of California, San Diego
For $15,000.00 in payment authority to purchase professional training
courses in Fiscal Year 2022-23 for the Water Services Department
(WSD). The WSD safety and training staff are required to maintain their
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) certification to
ensure they can train WSD employees on OSHA regulations.
26 Arizona Public Service Company doing business as
APS
For $250,000.00 in payment authority for the design and construction of
electrical services to a new Pressure Reducing Valve Station located at
approximately Carefree Highway and 51st Avenue for Water Facilities and
to a new Lift Station 77 located at the AZ Loop 303 and 51st Avenue for
Wastewater Facilities for the Water Services Department. The City
anticipates the work to be done in multiple phases depending on
Page 82
development progress.
27 OGMIS Group Inc.
For $25,805.00 in payment authority to purchase Acrulog Hydrogen
Sulfide Monitors for the Water Services Department. The equipment is
required for the purpose of assisting with repair and rehabilitation projects
to prevent failure of sanitary sewer structures in the Wastewater Collection
System.
28 City of Glendale - Intergovernmental Agreement 123273
For $21,500.00 annual payment authority for Intergovernmental
Agreement 123273 to provide water treatment services to the Camelback
Ranch area located within the boundaries of the City of Phoenix but
outside the City's water distribution system, for the Water Services
Department.
29 City of Glendale - Intergovernmental Agreements
114154 and 114155
For $65,000.00 in additional payment authority for Intergovernmental
Agreements 114154 and 114155 pertaining to treated sewer service and
treated water service to an area located in Phoenix. The
Intergovernmental Agreements provide for sewer and water service to the
area of Arizona State Route 101 and 51st Avenue located within the
boundaries of the City of Phoenix but outside the City's system, for the
Water Services Department.
30 City of Scottsdale
For $50,000.00 in payment authority for Contract 69310 with the City of
Scottsdale, pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding of
Overlapping Retail Sewer Services for the Water Services Department.
The City of Scottsdale provides sewer services at a wholesale rate to
Phoenix customers for sewer areas within Phoenix boundaries but outside
the Water Services Department's distribution and wastewater collection
area.
31 City of Mesa
For $100,000.00 for annual payment authority for the water, wastewater,
solid waste, and gas costs associated with the Val Vista Water Treatment
Page 83
Plant, including yearly maintenance and repair shutdown for the Water
Services Department. During the shutdown, services are purchased from
the City of Mesa for the site, including potable water, wastewater services,
solid waste services for removing debris from the Salt River Project South
Canal, and natural gas services to power standby generators.
32 City of Buckeye
For $570,000.00 in payment authority for Contract 100744 to continue the
operation of the City of Phoenix landfill within the City of Buckeye, for the
Public Works Department. Payment of royalties is based on 7.5 percent
of the gate revenue generated from solid waste received at each transfer
station and disposed of at the SR85 Landfill in Buckeye. The
Intergovernmental Agreement requires Phoenix to reimburse Buckeye for
its solid waste collection and disposal fees paid on behalf of the prison
adjacent to the SR85 Landfill.
33 Settlement of Claim(s) Tryon v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $200,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in Tryon
v. City of Phoenix, CV2017-094749, 16-0689-001, GL, BI, for the
Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a
settlement for a bodily injury claim arising from a non-vehicular accident
that occurred on Aug. 8, 2016.
Page 84
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Proposed 2022-23 Budget for the City of Phoenix
Request the City Council call for a special meeting of the City Council, as required by
A.R.S. 42-17105, at 2:30 p.m., Wednesday, June 15, 2022, for the purpose of
considering adoption of the final 2022-23 budget for the City of Phoenix, including
Operating Funds, Capital Funds and Reappropriated Funds.
Request to authorize the City Manager to:
1. Set 2:30 p.m., Wednesday, June 1, 2022, as the time and date of the legally
required public hearing on the adoption of the tentative budget ordinances for the
Funds and Reappropriated Funds.
2. Set 2:30 p.m., Wednesday, June 1, 2022, as the time and date of the public hearing
for purposes of receiving public comments on the proposed 2022-27 Capital
Improvement Program.
3. Set 2:30 p.m., Wednesday, June 15, 2022, as the time and date of the legally
required public hearing on the adoption of a Property Tax Levy and Truth in
Taxation, if applicable, and the final adoption of the budget for the City of Phoenix
for the 2022-23 fiscal year, including Operating Funds, Capital Funds, and
Reappropriated Funds.
4. Set 10:00 a.m., Friday, July 1, 2022, as the time and date of the legally required
public hearing on the adoption of the Property Tax Levy for the 2022-23 fiscal year.
Summary
In addition to these legally required public hearings, from April 2 through April 15,
2022, 11 community budget hearings were advertised in various city newspapers and
online, and were held for each Council District in the City Council Chambers through a
virtual platform. These hearings also provided residents with several opportunities to
comment on the proposed 2022-23 budget and were video recorded for viewing on the
City’s YouTube page and on PHXTV. Residents also had the opportunity to provide
feedback via phone, email or through the City’s online budget tool FundPHX. All
comments and messages were summarized and forwarded in weekly City Council
reports.
Page 85
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.
Page 86
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
West Colter Street (Ordinance S-48554)
Request for the City Council to dedicate a strip of City-owned land along the west side
of North 7th Avenue, north of West Colter Street, to public use for right-of-way
purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
Dedication of this right-of-way is necessary for the 2020 Federal TAP HAWK
installation project to accommodate public improvements including an Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) sidewalk, a traffic signal pole, pedestrian push button, power
pedestal, controller cabinet and two 12-inch signal head pole mounts. The Parks and
Recreation Department provided concurrence for this dedication which is an
approximate five-foot strip of land along the west side of North 7th Avenue within
Colter Park.
The strip of land to be dedicated is within Maricopa County Assessor's parcel number
156-43-125A and is more fully described in the legal description to be recorded with
the ordinance.
Location
North 7th Avenue and West Colter Street
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Mario
Paniagua, and the Street Transportation and Finance departments.
Page 87
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Trail Easements Along West Sonoran Desert Drive, East of Interstate 17
(Ordinance S-48567)
Request for the City Council to dedicate to public use right-of-way for roadway
purposes, drainage, public utility, slope, and trail easements along West Sonoran
Desert Drive, east of Interstate 17; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
The fee simple right-of-way and easements were acquired for the Sonoran Desert
Drive roadway improvements through a Final Order of Condemnation recorded on
Dec. 6, 2016, Maricopa County recording number 2016-0898820. Dedicating the
property interests to public use for roadway, drainage, public utility, slope, and trail
purposes is necessary to accommodate public improvements. The property interests
are located along West Sonoran Desert Drive, east of Interstate 17, more fully
described in legal descriptions to be recorded with the ordinance.
Location
Along West Sonoran Desert Drive, east of Interstate 17, within Maricopa County
Assessor's parcel number 204-11-002P.
Council District: 2
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Mario
Paniagua, and the Finance and Street Transportation departments.
Page 88
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Valley Road from 35th to 67th Avenues (Ordinance S-48555)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire all real property
and related property interests required by donation, purchase within the City's
appraised value, or by the power of eminent domain for roadway improvements along
West Happy Valley Road from 35th to 67th avenues. Further request to authorize
dedication of land with roadway improvements to public use for right-of-way purposes
via separate recording instrument. Additionally, request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
Acquisition of real property is required to accommodate roadway improvements along
West Happy Valley Road from 67th to 35th avenues to enhance road and sidewalk
conditions for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicular traffic. Improvements will include
new Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) sidewalks, ramps, curb, gutter, and a
designated bike lane.
The parcels affected by this project are identified in Attachment A.
Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget.
Location
Along West Happy Valley Road from 35th to 67th avenues.
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Mario
Paniagua and the Street Transportation and Finance departments.
Page 89
Attachment A
Property Identification
Happy Valley Road- 35th to 67th Avenues
The following improved and/or unimproved parcels affected by acquisition and included in this
request are identified by the Maricopa County Assessor’s parcel number (APN) and the
address or location.
APN Address / Location
201-11-017A 4902 W. Fallen Leaf Lane
201-12-011C 5727 W. Happy Valley Road
201-12-511 24832 N. 65th Ave.
201-12-512 24845 N. 65th Ave.
201-38-790 25014 N. 51st Drive
201-42-573B 5450 W. Happy Valley Road
205-07-046 4552 W. Happy Valley Road
205-07-047 4560 W. Happy Valley Road
205-07-048 4649 W. Buckskin Trail
205-07-181 25001 N 49th Ave.
205-07-183 25001 N. 49th Ave.
205-07-184 25001 N. 49th Ave.
205-07-215 4539 W. Happy Valley Road
205-07-334 4548 W. Happy Valley Road
205-11-005G 24838 N. 35th Ave.
205-11-005J 24838 N. 35th Ave.
205-12-009J 24841 N. 49th Ave.
205-12-987 24839 N. 47th Ave.
205-12-988 24839 N. 47th Ave.
205-14-586 4020 W. Villa Linda Drive
205-14-587 4010 W. Villa Linda Drive
1 of 1
Page 90
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
South 35th Avenue from West Dobbins to West Carver Roads (Ordinance S-
48560)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire easements by
donation, purchase within the City's appraised value, or by the power of eminent
domain required for a 16-inch water main improvement project along South 35th
Avenue from West Dobbins to West Carver roads. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
Acquisition of easements is required for construction and improvement of a water main
line. Installation of a 5,150 foot, 16-inch pipe along South 35th Avenue from West
Dobbins to West Carver roads will ensure a more reliable water supply and
redundancy in the Laveen area. Improvements also will include new line valves, blow
off and drain hydrants, and connections to new pipes at either end, and will support an
improved looped system.
The parcels affected by this project and included in this request are identified by
Maricopa County Assessor's parcel number (APN) 300-15-010C located at 10201 S.
35th Ave. and APN 300-15-011B located at 10207 S. 35th Ave.
Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget.
Location
Along the east side of South 35th Avenue between the West Whispering Hills Drive
alignment and West Carver Road.
Council District: Out of City
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Karen
Peters and the Water Services and Finance departments.
Page 91
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
North Cave Creek Road, South of East Desert Cove Avenue (Ordinance S-48590)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire real property and
related property interests by donation, purchase within the City's appraised value, or
by the power of eminent domain for bus stop enhancements along the west side of
North Cave Creek Road, south of East Desert Cove Avenue. Further request to
authorize dedication of an easement to public use for sidewalk purposes via separate
recording instrument. Additionally, request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item.
Summary
The acquisition of real property is needed to enhance the existing bus stop located
along the west side of North Cave Creek Road, south of East Desert Cove Avenue.
The bus stop enhancements will include an updated transit pad with area for shelter
placement and comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The parcel affected by this project is identified by Maricopa County Assessor's parcel
number 159-22-093D located at 10844 N. Cave Creek Road.
Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Public Transit Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget.
Location
Along the west side of North Cave Creek Road, south of East Desert Cove Avenue.
Council District: 3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Mario
Paniagua, and the Public Transit and Finance departments.
Page 92
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Avenue between McDowell Road and Muhammad Ali Way and 5th Avenue
between McDowell and Thomas Roads (Ordinance S-48593)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire real property and
related property interests by donation, purchase within the City's appraised value, or
by the power of eminent domain for bicycle and pedestrian improvements along 3rd
Avenue between McDowell Road and Muhammad Ali Way and 5th Avenue between
McDowell and Thomas roads. Further request to authorize dedication of land with
street improvements to public use for right-of-way purposes via separate recording
instrument. Additionally, request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item.
Summary
The acquisition of real property is needed to facilitate street improvements to enhance
bicycle and pedestrian safety along 3rd and 5th avenues. The improvements include
drainage, striping, street lighting, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) sidewalks and
traffic signal upgrades.
The properties impacted by this project and included in this request are identified in
Attachment A.
Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget.
Location
Along 3rd Avenue between McDowell Road and Muhammad Ali Way and 5th Avenue
between McDowell and Thomas roads.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Mario
Paniagua and the Street Transportation and Finance departments.
Page 93
Attachment A
Property Identification
Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements along 3rd Avenue Between McDowell Road and
Muhammad Ali Way and 5th Avenue Between McDowell and Thomas Roads
The following improved and/or unimproved parcels affected by acquisition and included in this
request are identified by the Maricopa County Assessor’s parcel number (APN) and the
address or location.
APN Address / Location
118-42-022 502 W. Virginia Ave.
118-42-084 501 W. Thomas Road
118-43-013
2 83 W. Cambridge Ave.
118-43-063 107 W. Windsor Ave.
118-43-102 77 W. Edgemont Ave.
118-48-121 97 W. Virginia Ave.
148-49-113 345 W. Lewis Ave.
118-49-138 346 W. Encanto Blvd.
118-49-141 302 W. Wilshire Drive
118-50-019 501 W. Encanto Blvd.
1 of 1
Page 94
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
48570)
Request for the City Council to accept easements for sewer and drainage purposes;
further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
Accepting the property interest below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.
Easement (a)
Applicant: Grand Canyon University, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sewer
Location: 5205 N. 28th Drive
File: FN 220015
Council District: 5
Easement (b)
Applicant: Alta 99th Ave, LP, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 4411 N. 99th Ave.
File: FN 220003
Council District: 5
Easement (c)
Applicant: PHCN Two LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 5000 N. Camelback Ridge Drive
File: FN 220008
Council District: 6
Easement (d)
Applicant: PHCN Landco LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Page 95
Location: 5010 N. Camelback Ridge Drive
File: FN 220008
Council District: 6
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Alan
Stephenson and the Planning and Development and Finance departments.
Page 96
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Public Utility Purposes (Ordinance S-48571)
Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate deeds and easements for
roadway, sidewalk and public utility purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.
Deed (a)
Applicant: Roma Meadows LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 805 E. Roma Ave.
File: FN 220023
Council District: 4
Easement (b)
Applicant: APC 2260 LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 2260 W. Glendale Ave.
File: FN 220017
Council District: 5
Easement (c)
Applicant: DL Dalton, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 4111 E. Glenrosa Ave.
File: FN 220025
Council District: 6
Easement (d)
Applicant: Omar Puebla and Ana Lilia Chavira Hernandez, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Page 97
Location: 5420 S. 10th Ave.
File: FN 220024
Council District: 7
Deed (e)
Applicant: Omar Puebla and Ana Lilia Chavira Hernandez, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 5420 S. 10th Ave.
File: FN 220024
Council District: 7
Easement (f)
Applicant: JLB Runway LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 1000 N. 44th St.
File: FN 220010
Council District: 8
Deed (g)
Applicant: Fen Investments, Inc., its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 2315 E. Portland St.
File: FN 220021
Council District: 8
Easement (h)
Applicant: 10th Street Villas LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 6417 S. 10th St.
File: FN 220019
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Alan
Stephenson and the Planning and Development and Finance departments.
Page 98
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Roadway and Underground Utility Purposes (Ordinance S-48600)
Request for the City Council to accept right-of-way from Arizona State Land
Department for roadway and underground utilities and to dedicate the land to public
use for roadway and underground utility purposes; further ordering the ordinance
recorded.
Additionally, request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City
Code section 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this
transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise
would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code section 42-18, as the Arizona State Land
Department's documents include such provisions.
Summary
ZT 56TH STREET AT 101 NE OWNER, LLC, acquired approximately 1.37 acres of
right-of-way for roadway and underground utilities from the Arizona State Land
Department on the east half of 56th Street between City North Drive and State Route
101. As a condition of the right-of-way acquisition, ZT 56TH STREET AT 101 NE
OWNER, LLC is required to assign and transfer all title and interest of the right-of-way
to the City. The Street Transportation Department has agreed to accept and maintain
the right-of-way which includes the roadway and underground utilities. The right-of-way
is further described in the legal description to be recorded with the ordinance.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix as the right-of-way and all fees
associated with this transaction were paid by ZT 56TH STREET AT 101 NE OWNER,
LLC.
Location
East half of 56th Street between City North Drive and State Route 101.
Council District: 2
Page 99
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Mario
Paniagua and the Street Transportation and Finance departments.
Page 100
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a cooperative
participating agreement with Sentinel Offender Services, LLC., to utilize the Home
Detention Program by the Law Department. A cooperative contract was established by
the State of Arizona under Contract CTR051762. There is no financial impact to the
City's General Fund.
Summary
The Law Department utilizes the Home Detention Program for electronic monitoring as
permitted by Arizona law and City code. This program is an ongoing, existing program
that was authorized by the Phoenix City Council in 2004 (P.C.C. § 2-100) as an
alternative to jail for many misdemeanor, first offenses, and first and second DUI
offenses. Since inception, this program has monitored over 14,000 offenders. The
beneficial impact of this program allows the City to avoid incurred cost that is otherwise
required when offenders are housed in a jail/detention facility.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10 a participating agreement is
required when the City uses a cooperative agreement from another public agency. The
contracts were awarded through a competitive process consistent with the City's
procurement processes, as set forth in the Phoenix City Code (P.C.C.) Chapter 43.
The State of Arizona contract covers the use of the Home Detention Program as
required by the Law Department. The contract was awarded on Oct. 1, 2020.
Upon City Council approval of this item, a purchasing agreement incorporating the
City's terms and conditions will be fully executed between the referenced vendor and
the City.
The Assistant Finance Director recommends that the contract with Sentinel Offender
Services, LLC. be accepted.
Contract Term
The five-year contract term will begin on or about May 15, 2022.
Page 101
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City's General Fund as all financial responsibility is
directly between the offender and Sentinel Offender Services LLC.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Law Department.
Page 102
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Articulate Global, LLC to provide software licenses used to develop online training
courses for City employees for the Human Resources Department. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of
the contract will not exceed $332,000.
Summary
This contract is needed to provide citywide trainers with the ability to develop custom,
interactive courses to be uploaded into the learning management system. The licenses
include the ability to create fully responsive and interactive courses which can be used
on every type of device; a continually updated content library of more than six million
images and customizable slide templates; a project review app; and, live and on-
demand online training.
Request to authorize an exception to the requirements of Phoenix City Code section
42-18 to allow inclusion of indemnification and limitation of liability provisions in the
agreement with Articulate Global, LLC. The risk of this exception is low due to the
license only being used for creating the training materials. The training will then be
uploaded into the learning management system. Articulate Global, LLC has requested
these exemptions as a condition of entering into a contract with the city of Phoenix for
the purchase of software licenses.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition citing a time restriction to purchase
authoring licenses to create fully responsive and interactive courses.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about May 11, 2022 for a five-year term.
Page 103
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value for will not exceed $332,000 for the five-year aggregate
term.
Funding is available in the Human Resources Department's operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.
Page 104
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures and to extend the term of the Letters of Agreement with CenturyLink
Communications, LLC dba Lumen Technologies Group, LLC, Contract 155451; Cox
Arizona Telecom, LLC, Contract 155343; and Zayo Group, LLC, Contract 155342 to
continue to purchase carrier and broadband provider services for departments
Citywide. The additional expenditures will not exceed $6.8 million. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
City departments utilize carrier and broadband provider services for telecommunication
lines, circuits and services used across the City. Services include internet, phone lines,
data circuits and distributed denial of service protection. The usage of these
technologies is critical to the operations of all City departments. Services are procured
utilizing the State of Arizona cooperative agreements, which offer significant cost
savings due to the benefit from local government pricing and volume discounts.
Existing services and related expenses are essential to the operations of the City, as
they provide telecommunication lines, circuits, and services used to satisfy a variety of
needs across the City. Continuation of these agreements allows the City to pay for
monthly carrier and broadband services while the City adopts the new State of Arizona
cooperative agreements.
Contract Term
The term of these agreements will be extended through June 30, 2023. This request
will allow additional time for the City to enter into and negotiate linking agreements and
obtain City Council authorization to adopt them.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $6.8 million in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
agreements will not exceed $13.1 million. Funds are available in various City
departments' budgets.
Page 105
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Information
Technology Services Department.
Page 106
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
48586)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures and to extend the term of the Letters of Agreement with AT&T Mobility
National Accounts, LLC, Contract 155219; T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Solutions,
Inc., Contract 155270; and Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless, Contract 155221
to continue to purchase wireless communications services, accessories, and
equipment for departments Citywide. The additional expenditures will not exceed $8.6
million. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item.
Summary
City departments utilize mobile devices, wireless services, equipment and accessories
to conduct City business every day. Equipment and services are procured utilizing the
State of Arizona cooperative agreements, which offer significant cost savings due to
the benefit from national government pricing and volume discounts. Existing
equipment and services are used by staff to provide critical services to the public in
various locations throughout the valley. Currently, the City pays for services for more
than 5,000 cellular phones, 6,000 air cards, 6,000 push to talk radios, 470 tablets, and
various other services and equipment. Continuation of these agreements is essential
to the City, as the agreements allow the City to pay for monthly cellular services and
purchase equipment and accessories as needed while the City adopts the State of
Arizona cooperative agreements.
Contract Term
The term of these agreements will be extended through June 30, 2023. This request
will allow additional time for the City to enter into and negotiate linking agreements and
obtain City Council authorization to adopt them.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $8.6 million in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
agreements will not exceed $18,875,000. Funds are available in various City
departments' budgets.
Page 107
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Information
Technology Services Department.
Page 108
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
48584)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to transfer retirement funds for
Jennie Mendoza in the amount of $128,342.50 to the Arizona State Retirement
System. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse funds.
Summary
Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, sections 38-730 and 38-922, retirement service
credits for former members of the City of Phoenix Employees’ Retirement System
(COPERS) may be transferred to the Arizona State Retirement System upon approval
by the City Council. The following former City of Phoenix employee has requested
transfer of the balance of their credited service:
Mendoza, Jennie: $128,342.50
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was approved by the COPERS Board at the April 7, 2022 meeting.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Retirement
Office.
Page 109
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Sustainability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories - Amendment
(Ordinance S-48612)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Intergovernmental Agreement 154619 with the Arizona State University Global Institute
of Sustainability to provide additional funding to conduct a Water Systems Greenhouse
Gas Consumption Emissions Inventory for the year 2020. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures included in this amendment will not exceed $42,000.
Summary
The Office of Environmental Programs (OEP) entered into an Intergovernmental
Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona State University (ASU) Global Institute of
Sustainability (GIOS) for consultant services to calculate 2020 Greenhouse Gas
(GHG) emissions based on most recent available data. ASU GIOS has conducted
GHG inventories for City operations and community-wide since 2012. ASU reviews the
data provided by the City and measures emission reductions to track the City’s
progress on meeting its reduction goals. OEP plans to conduct GHG inventories every
two years.
This amendment adds to the existing scope of services with completion of a Water
System GHG consumption-based emissions inventory for 2020. This inventory will
tabulate the lifecycle GHG emissions of the City’s water system. The lifecycle of the
City’s water system includes, but is not limited to:
· diversion and conveyance of water from the Colorado River through the Central
Arizona Project;
· diversion and conveyance of water from the Salt and Verde Rivers through the Salt
River Project;
· energy consumption to treat raw water to drinking water quality;
· energy consumption to distribute water from water treatment facilities to the tap;
· energy consumption to collect stormwater and wastewater in City sewers;
· wastewater treatment and discharge; and
· downstream uses of wastewater treatment byproducts, like biosolids and greywater.
Page 110
Contract Term
There is no change to the contract term. The IGA may be extended based on
continuous need and available funding, which may be exercised by the City Manager
or designee.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for this IGA was for an expenditure not-to-exceed $95,000.
This amendment will increase the authorization for the IGA by an additional $42,000,
for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $137,000.
Funding for this amendment is available in the Office of Environmental Programs
budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved IGA 154619 (Ordinance S-47588) on May 19, 2020.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Office of
Environmental Programs.
Page 111
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
and Urban Development Family Self-Sufficiency Service Coordinator Grant
(Ordinance S-48611)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, accept, and, if
awarded, enter into any agreements as necessary to implement a Family Self-
Sufficiency (FSS) Service Coordinator grant from the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD). If awarded the FSS Service Coordinator grant is
anticipated to provide up to $325,000 in funding for calendar year 2022 to fund up
to four staff members. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept,
and the City Controller to disburse, all funds for the life of the grant.
Summary
The Housing Department is seeking to apply for a FSS Service Coordinator grant
from HUD. This ongoing program helps caseworkers develop local strategies to
connect participating Public Housing and Section 8 families to public and private
resources to increase their earned income and financial empowerment, reduce or
eliminate the need for welfare assistance, and make progress toward economic
independence and self-sufficiency.
Caseworkers coordinate support services offered by non-profit, governmental, and
educational community partners; provide case planning and coordination,
supportive counseling and referral and advocacy; assist with access to educational
resources, vocational training and employment opportunities; and assist with
budgeting, homeownership preparation, and transportation. Successful participants
engage in training, improve employment outcomes, save money, and buy a home.
In the past year, 17 residents graduated from the FSS program.
The Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) is anticipated to be issued in Summer
2022. Due to the timing of the NOFA and quick turnaround for grant submittal, the
Housing Department is requesting authority to apply prior to receiving the NOFA.
Page 112
Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. This grant does not require matching
funds.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.
Page 113
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Parents as Teachers National Center, Inc. to provide an Early Head Start Home-
Based curriculum for the Head Start Birth to Five Program in an amount not to exceed
$550,000 for a five-year period. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
The Early Head Start Home-Based program provides 90-minute weekly visits to 300
families whose children are under the age of three and pregnant women. The child-
focused visits promote the parents' ability to support their child's development through
parent-child interaction strategies, developmentally appropriate school readiness
activities and comprehensive services for family well being. A research-based early
childhood home-based curriculum is essential to achieve high outcomes for children.
The curriculum must be developmentally, linguistically, and culturally appropriate to
support children birth to three years of age and pregnant women.
Procurement Information
On Jan. 14, 2022, RFP-21-EDU-49 was issued in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10 for Competitive Sealed Proposals. Two offers were received on Feb.
25, 2022.
The offers were determined to be responsive and responsible to the solicitation
requirements. The offers were scored on the following criteria:
Criteria and Possible Points
· Method of Approach and Curriculum Implementation - 500 possible points;
· Experience and Qualifications of Key Staff - 400 possible points; and
· Fee Schedule - 100 possible points.
The scores were as follows:
· Parents as Teachers National Center, Inc. - 780 points
Page 114
· Teaching Strategies, LLC - 420 points
It is the consensus of the evaluation committee to recommend a contract award to
Parents as Teachers National Center, Inc.
Contract Term
The contract term shall begin on or about July 1, 2022, and will end on June 30, 2027,
with no option to extend.
Financial Impact
Expenditures shall not exceed $550,000 over the life of the contract. Funding is
available from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration of
Children, Youth and Families. No additional General Funds are required.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On Oct. 14, 2021, the Head Start Birth to Five Policy Council approved the request to
release the Early Head Start Home-Based Curriculum RFP.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.
Page 115
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Agreement for Educational Resources and Tutoring for Low-Income and Title I K
-8 Students (Ordinance S-48604)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona State University (ASU) to offer a youth
reading program, providing low-income parents and caretakers educational resources
to engage their K-8 children at home and matches children from low-income
communities with an ASU student as their tutor/mentor (the "Program"). The term of
the contract will begin on or about Feb. 1, 2022 and end on Dec. 31, 2023. The
aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $290,108.86. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. Funding is
one-time monies from the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund pursuant to the
American Rescue Plan Act. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Summary
Phoenix Public Library, City of Phoenix and ASU share a common interest in
advancing the educational opportunities of low-income K-8 students, a population
whose educations have been disproportionately interrupted due to changes in
instructional methods necessitated by the outbreak of COVID-19 in the Phoenix area.
ASU has developed a program that provides low-income families with educational
resources to engage their K-8 children at home and matches children from low-income
communities with an ASU student as their tutor/mentor during tutoring sessions held at
public facilities. The Program will provide at least two hours of one-on-one reading
comprehension tutoring to each K-8 student participating in the Program per week
during ASU's Fall, Spring (12 weeks) and Summer (8 weeks) Semesters. ASU will
recruit eligible students attending a Title I school and low-income K-8 students in the
Phoenix area.
Contract Term
The term of the contract will begin on or about June 1, 2022 and end on Dec. 23,
2023.
Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $290,108.86. Funding is one-time
Page 116
monies from the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund pursuant to the American
Rescue Plan Act. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.
Page 117
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Mapping Consultative Services - Requirements Contract (Ordinance S-48557)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into agreements with:
BPG Designs LLC; Coe and Van Loo II LLC, dba CVL Consultants; Entellus Inc.;
Geoinovo Solutions Inc.; GH2 Architects LLC; IMEG Corp.; Lloyd Consulting Group
LLC; Matrix New World Engineering; Olson Inc.; and Timmons Group Inc. to purchase
Architectural, Engineering, Land Survey and Geographic Information System (GIS)
Mapping Consultative Services for the Neighborhood Services Department (NSD).
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The aggregate contract value will not exceed $625,000.
Summary
The awarded contractors will provide architectural, engineering, land survey, and
geographic information system mapping consultative services on an as-needed basis
for NSD. This list will allow NSD to contract work assignments in order to survey
properties to verify legal parcel boundaries for code enforcement cases, create
customized maps for grant and non-grant funded programs and projects, and perform
architectural and design assessments for residential/commercial construction projects.
Examples of architectural and engineering consulting work may include commercial
rehabilitation projects, façade improvements, interior building tenant improvements,
lighting and landscaping assessment consulting work performed under NSD's
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded Neighborhood Commercial
Revitalization program, which provides assistance to existing businesses and
commercial property owners along focused City of Phoenix business corridors.
Procurement Information
RFQu 22-029 was conducted in accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10. On
Dec. 10, 2021, 10 offers were received by the Procurement Division. The notification
was sent to 806 suppliers and was publicly posted and available for download from the
City's Website.
The offers were scored by a five-member evaluation panel on the following criteria:
· Experience and Qualifications - 400 points;
Page 118
· Method of Approach - 350 points; and
· Price - 250 points.
The Assistant Finance Director recommends that the offers from BPG Designs LLC;
Coe and Van Loo II LLC, dba CVL Consultants; Entellus Inc.; Geoinovo Solutions Inc.;
GH2 Architects LLC; IMEG Corp.; Lloyd Consulting Group LLC; Matrix New World
Engineering; Olson Inc.; and Timmons Group Inc. be accepted as the highest scored,
responsive and responsible offers most advantageous to the City.
Contract Term
The agreements will begin on or about June 1, 2022. The initial term of the
agreements will be for three years with two one-year options to extend that may be
exercised in the discretion of the City Manager or designee.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $625,000. Funds are available in the
Neighborhood Services Department's budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.
Page 119
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Action Plan
Request City Council approval of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 Annual Action Plan
broad activity areas and the submission of the plan to the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD).
Summary
The FY 2022-23 Annual Action Plan examines housing and community development
needs in the City of Phoenix and defines strategies for addressing those needs
throughout the year. The Annual Action Plan contains the planning and application
requirements for four major HUD programs that provide critical funds to entitlement
cities such as Phoenix every year. The four programs are: the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnership (HOME),
Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS
(HOPWA). Through adoption of the 2020-24 Consolidated Plan in May 2020, City
Council approved the general priorities and plans for these programs. Funds for these
four programs are allocated annually by HUD to the City based on population and
other socio-economic indicators. Each year the Annual Action Plan details how federal
funds will be spent during the coming year.
FY 2022-23 Program Allocations:
Pursuant to 24 Code of Federal Regulation 91.15(a)(1), the City is required to submit
its Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans to HUD at least 45 days prior to the
start of the program year, which is May 15. In the absence of HUD’s official notification
of the FY 2022-23 grant allocations for CDBG, HOME, ESG and HOPWA, the City has
referenced guidance release by HUD and posted the draft 2022-23 Annual Action Plan
for public comment with 2021-22 funding levels and contingency funding language, in
order to meet the statutory submission deadline. The funding contingency language is
in Attachment A.
CDBG
· Critical Core Department Programs: $10,924,212
· CDBG Program Management, Coordination, and Support: $3,3361,296
Page 120
· Public Services: $2,520,972
Total CDBG Funding: $16,806,480
HOME
· Multi-Family Rental Housing, Down Payment Assistance, Special Projects and
Reconstruction/Rehabilitation of Owner-Occupied Homes: $5,302,885
· Program Management and Coordination: $589,209
Total HOME Funding: $5,892,094
HOPWA
· Client and Housing Services: $3,296,765
· Program Management and Coordination: $101,962
Total HOPWA Funding: $3,398,727
ESG
· Emergency Shelter: $846,049
· Rapid Re-Housing: $544,985
· Homeless Management Information System: $10,000
· Administration: $22,727
Total ESG Funding: $1,423,761
Total HUD Allocations:
CDBG: $16,806,480
HOME: $5,892,094
HOPWA: $3,398,727
ESG: $1,423,761
Total HUD Allocation: $27,521,062
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Community and Cultural Investment
Subcommittee on May 4, 2022, by a 4-0 vote.
Public Outreach
The Annual Action Plan process was approved by City Council on Oct. 27, 2021. A
survey was distributed by multiple City departments, through social media outlets, and
posted on the Neighborhood Services Department’s webpage on Dec. 2, 2021, to
obtain community and stakeholder input relative to the priorities identified through the
2020-2021 Consolidated Plan process. The survey was offered in English and Spanish
and more than 400 responses were received. On March 17, 2022, a HUD required,
Page 121
virtual public hearing was held to share the survey results and obtain additional public
input to assess community needs throughout Phoenix. Residents and neighborhood
leaders provided input regarding housing, social services, neighborhood revitalization,
and community development. Additionally, residents who were unable to attend the
public hearing had the opportunity to submit comments via e-mail or voicemail. This
information, along with the needs assessment, formed the basis for the FY 2022-23
Annual Action Plan.
A draft of the FY 2022-23 Annual Action Plan was made available on April 8, 2022, for
an advertised 30-day public comment period and a second HUD required, virtual
public hearing was conducted on April 21, 2022, to obtain community and stakeholder
input relative to the draft. The goal of the Annual Action Plan process, per HUD
requirements, is to ensure comprehensive community planning, and coordinated
service delivery to meet critical housing and community development needs.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Gina Montes and Alan Stephenson,
and the Neighborhood Services, Human Services, and Housing departments.
Page 122
Attachment A
Funding Contingencies FY2022-2023
Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan
Pursuant to 24 CFR 91.15(a)(1), The City is required to submit its Consolidated Plan, and
Annual Action Plans to HUD at least 45 days prior to the start of the program year (July 1,
2022). In the absence of HUD’s official notification of the 2022-2023 CPD formula grant
allocations, the City has referenced previous guidance release by HUD in Notice CPD-21-02
and will post the draft 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan for public comment with contingency
funding language, in adherence with the City’s Citizen Participation Plan and in order to meet
the statutory submission deadline. The funding contingency language is as follows:
Funding Scenario CDBG CDBG Public CDBG Administration
Services
CDBG Public Services
Reduce the amount of
Cap is 15%. Reduce
funds allocated to the
the amount of funds
following programs:
allocated to the
CDBG Administrative
• Neighborhood following programs:
CDBG funding Program • Public Services Administrative funding
allocation is less RFP first, and any allocation will be
• Neighborhood
than $16,806,480 additional adjusted as necessary
Infrastructures
reductions to, to not exceed the cap.
Program
• Family Self
• Owner-Occupied
Sufficiency, as
Housing
necessary to not
Rehabilitation
exceed the 15%
Program.
cap
CDBG Public Services
CDBG Administrative
Increase the amount of Cap is 15%. The
funds allocated to the CDBG Public Services
CDBG funding Administrative funding
following program: RFP will increase by
allocation is greater will increase by 20% of
15% of the overall
than $16,806,480 • Rental Rehabilitation increase in program
the overall increase in
Program program allocation.
allocation.
Funding Scenario HOME HOME CHDO HOME Administration
HOME requires a 15% HOME Administrative
HOME funding programs will be Community Housing Administrative funding
allocation is less proportionately Development allocation will be
than $5,892,094 decreased. Organizations that adjusted as necessary
undertake housing to not exceed the cap.
development activities.
Page 123
Funds will be adjusted
as necessary to meet
the required 15%
CHDO set aside.
HOME requires a 15%
set aside for
All programs will remain Community Housing
HOME Administrative
fully funded at the Development
2021-22 funding level, Organizations that
HOME funding Administrative funding
with 100% of increased undertake housing
allocation is greater allocation will be
funding allocated to development activities.
than $5,892,094 adjusted as necessary
Multifamily Rental Funds will be adjusted
to not exceed the cap.
Housing Development. as necessary to meet
the required 15%
CHDO set aside.
Funding Scenario HOPWA HOPWA Administration
HOPWA Administrative Cap is
funding allocation is lower programs will be proportionately allocation will be adjusted as
than $3,398,727 decreased. necessary to not exceed the
cap.
All programs will remain fully
HOPWA Administrative Cap is
funded at 2021-22 funding
levels, with 100% of increased
funding allocation is greater allocation will be adjusted as
funding allocated to HOPWA
than $3,398,727 necessary to not exceed the
Tenant-Based Rental
cap.
Assistance (TBRA).
Funding Scenario Emergency Shelter Grant ESG Administration
allocation is lower than will be proportionately will be adjusted as necessary to
$1,423,761 decreased. not exceed the cap.
Increased funding will be
allocated to Emergency
allocation is greater than Services. will be adjusted as necessary to
$1,423,761 • Emergency Shelter funding not exceed the cap.
increase would serve
single individuals and
families with children and
Page 124
crisis services for homeless
individuals.
• Rapid Rehousing provides
more services for homeless
individuals and families.
Page 125
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to reprogram $350,000 of
available Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program income to continue
to fund additional focused code enforcement. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Summary
Each fiscal year, the Neighborhood Services Department (NSD) requests that program
income from projects funded by the CDBG allocation are reprogrammed to provide an
additional year of continued funding for two Neighborhood Preservation Inspector I
positions originally eliminated as part of the 2009 General Fund budget reduction. For
Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23, NSD is requesting $350,000 be reprogrammed for the two
positions. Staff will continue to provide enforcement of the Neighborhood Preservation
Ordinance in eligible, focused low- and moderate-income census tracts, specifically in
the City's Neighborhood Initiative and Redevelopment areas, including the West
Phoenix Revitalization Area through June 30, 2023.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Community and Cultural Investment
Subcommittee on May 4, 2022, by a 4-0 vote.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.
Page 126
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Programs (Ordinance S-48580)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to procure services and
amend existing contracts, including increasing spending limits, as necessary or
appropriate to implement the Neighborhood Services Department's grant-funded
Infrastructure and Enhancement Programs in an aggregate amount not to exceed
$7,368,820. All existing contract spending limits are included in the aggregate total for
this item. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City
Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item.
Summary
The Neighborhood Services Department (NSD) administers infrastructure and
enhancement projects that benefit low- and moderate-income residents of Phoenix,
and prevent or eliminate blight by improving the physical infrastructure of
neighborhoods. Infrastructure and Enhancement Programs are designed and
implemented in partnership with active neighborhood organizations and City of
Phoenix departments, including Parks and Recreation and Street Transportation, to
provide additional resources and support to execute strategies that achieve basic
neighborhood improvement goals. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG),
funds the following Infrastructure and Enhancement Programs:
· The Neighborhood Infrastructure Program sponsors activities that improve streets
and street lighting, water and sewer, drainage, and other infrastructure projects in
low- and moderate-income areas. All projects are subject to federal regulations and
requirements.
· The Neighborhood Enhancement Program sponsors activities that address
neighborhood needs with projects that include, but are not limited to, improving
parks, playgrounds, landscaping and lighting, streets and landscaping, security, and
traffic mitigation. All projects are subject to federal regulations and requirements.
· Additional activities include the acquisition and rehabilitation of public facilities to
address slum and blight on a spot or area basis.
Page 127
NSD seeks authorization to proceed with all actions necessary or appropriate to
implement and administer grant-funded Neighborhood Infrastructure and
Enhancement Programs in Fiscal Year 2022-23.
· If approved, procure and/or amend any necessary contracts or agreements with the
grantor(s) to fund existing and future contracts in accordance with the grant terms.
· Acquire real property meeting the applicable federal rules and regulations and take
all actions necessary to carry out acquisition and rehabilitation activities in
accordance with grant terms.
· Take all other action necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of the item
and implement and administer the Neighborhood Infrastructure and Enhancement
Programs in accordance with federal regulations and requirements.
Applicant and Review Process
Neighborhood Infrastructure and Enhancement Programs applications may be
submitted any time and are reviewed by City of Phoenix staff as they are received to
determine the eligibility and feasibility of proposed projects. Successful applications
must benefit and serve low- and moderate-income residents of Phoenix and prevent or
eliminate blight by improving the physical infrastructure of neighborhoods.
Procurement Information
Services may be procured, as needed, utilizing procurement procedures in accordance
with Administrative Regulation 3.10 to implement and administer NSD's Neighborhood
Infrastructure and Enhancement Programs.
Financial Impact
These programs are funded by HUD through CDBG funds. There is no impact to the
General Fund.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Community and Cultural Investment
Subcommittee on May 4, 2022, by a 4-0 vote.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.
Page 128
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Public Facility Grant Award Recommendations (Ordinance S-48599)
Request the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) contracts for Public Service programs
and Public Facility projects for an amount not to exceed $804,840. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item over the life of the
contracts.
Summary
In October 2021, the City Council approved the issuance of a Request for Proposals
(RFP) for the CDBG funded Public Service and Public Facility (PS/PF) program for FY
2022-23. The PS/PF program provides an opportunity for non-profits to implement
facility improvements on non-profit owned buildings, that are open to the public as a
public facility, and to deliver critical programs and services serving low- and moderate-
income communities in Phoenix. The public service priorities were Low-Income Youth
Services, Support Services for Persons with Disabilities and Support Services for
Seniors. On Nov. 22, 2021, an RFP was issued by the Neighborhood Services
Department and closed on Dec. 21, 2021. A total of 29 responsive applications were
received.
Applications were evaluated and scored by the Community Development (CD) Review
Committee; an 11-member committee appointed by the Mayor. Each proposal was
rated on 1,000-point scale using the criteria outlined below.
Public Service Programs:
Program description/need - 250 points;
Proposed objectives and outcomes - 250 points;
Program budget - 250 points; and
Track record and capacity - 250 points.
Public Facility Projects:
Project description/need - 250 points;
Project feasibility - 250 points;
Project budget - 250 points; and
Page 129
Track record and capacity - 250 points.
A total of 26 proposals met the Committee's threshold score and were invited to make
presentations on their proposed programs/projects. The proposal presentations were
scored individually by the committee. Funding recommendations were developed
based on the overall committee's final scores.
The following list identifies the proposals recommended by the CD Review Committee
for funding.
CDBG Public Service Grant Program Awardees
· Assistance League of Phoenix - Operation School Bell Wardrobe for Children in
Poverty: $30,000
· Ballet Arizona - Dance AZ School Residency Program for Low-Income, Minority
Phoenix Youth: $30,000
· Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Arizona - Community Based, Site Based and
Virtual Mentoring in Phoenix: $30,000
· Boys & Girls Clubs of the Valley - Greater Futures for Phoenix Youth: $30,000
· Cancer Support Community Arizona - Support for Phoenix Seniors Impacted by
Cancer: $30,000
· Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc. - CPLC Community Center After School Program:
$30,000
· Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc. - CPLC Healthy Aging: $30,000
· Child Crisis Arizona - Independent Living for Foster Youth: $30,000
· Florence Crittenton Services of Arizona - Therapeutic Group Home: $30,000
· Future for Kids - Discover Your Future: Out of School Enrichment: $30,000
· Homeless Youth Connection - Empowering Youth for the Future: $30,000
· Sounds Academy - Comprehensive Music Programming for Low-Income, Minority
Phoenix Youth: $20,000
· United States Veterans Initiative - Support Services for Seniors: $30,000
CDBG Public Facility Grant Program Awardees
· Child Crisis Arizona - Independent Living for Foster Youth - Earll Facility
Improvements: $105,000
· Gompers - Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Enhancements and Security:
$150,000
· Southern Arizona Association for the Visually Impaired - Accessible Playground for
Page 130
Blind Children in Phoenix: $84,150
· The Opportunity Tree - ADA Accessible Renovations: $85,690
Contract Term
The term of the contracts will be July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023, with an option to
extend through Dec. 31, 2023, that may be exercised in the discretion of the City
Manager or designee.
Financial Impact
These programs are funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development through CDBG funding. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The FY 2022-23 CDBG PS/PF RFP was approved by the City Council on Oct. 27,
2021. The Community and Cultural Investment Subcommittee approved this item by a
4-0 vote at the May 4, 2022, meeting.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.
Page 131
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance S-48609)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to procure services and
amend existing contracts, including increasing spending limits, as necessary or
appropriate to implement the Neighborhood Services Department's grant-funded
Neighborhood Economic Development programs. All existing contract spending limits
are included in the aggregate total of this item. Further request to authorize the City
Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item.
There is no impact to the General Fund.
Summary
The Neighborhood Services Department (NSD) administers several economic
development programs that make a significant and positive impact on Phoenix
neighborhoods by expanding economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income
individuals through job creation and training, and providing valuable and timely
resources to the small businesses that serve their community including consultations,
technical assistance, financing opportunities, and forgivable loans for rehabilitation
projects. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), through the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), funds the Neighborhood Economic
Development (NED) programs listed below.
Entrepreneurship Assistance Program (EAP)
EAP provides admission into Phoenix-based co-working and accelerator spaces and
incubators, and direct access to trainings, technical assistance, and targeted
workshops in English, Spanish or other languages to low- and moderate-income small
business owners.
Management Technical Assistance (MTA) Program
MTA provides free consulting services and technical assistance to small businesses
through instructional and curriculum-based one-on-one meetings or group workshops
focused on topics including, but not limited to, branding marketing and other needed
services.
Page 132
Neighborhood Commercial Rehabilitation (NCR) Programs
Commercial neighborhood rehabilitation programs encourage neighborhood
revitalization. NCR provides financial and technical assistance to existing business and
commercial property owners along targeted city of Phoenix business corridors.
Program support, through capital improvements, ensure the long-term sustainability of
the community and structures.
Other Small Business Assistance Programs
To respond to the changing needs of the micro-business community, NSD may
propose developing additional tools and program resources to promote their
sustainability and success. Program funding could include grants, loans, or other
assistance for businesses that operate in or predominately serve low- to moderate-
income communities. In addition, partnerships with non-profit agencies or other
organizations could be established to leverage funding options and other services.
Program Eligibility for NSD's NED Programs
Business owners must meet a CDBG National Objective to take part in NED
Programs. Under Special Economic Development Activities owners must provide a
public benefit or deliver neighborhood enhancements, including job creation for local
residents, blight elimination, or the provision of qualified goods and services to
residents of targeted, low- to moderate-income Phoenix neighborhoods, to be eligible
to participate in economic development programs. Additionally, under 24-CFR
570.208, services must benefit low- to moderate-income residents and/or low- to
moderate-income Phoenix neighborhoods.
NSD estimates using up to $1.8 million in CDBG funds from current and prior HUD
allocations to implement economic development programs. NSD projects
approximately:
· $200,000 for EAP;
· $200,000 for MTA;
· $600,000 for Small Business Assistance; and
· $800,000 for NCR.
Activities include:
· Issue Request for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Calls for Interest,
Invitations for Bids, Request for Bids, and other procurements in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10;
Page 133
· Deliver economic development services with various business and/or property
through the utilization of financial tools such as grants and loans;
· Amend existing contracts with various business or property owners, or agencies
such as non- and for-profit organizations and other agencies to provide targeted
economic development services and implement and administer the Neighborhood
Economic Development Program activities; and
· Take all other action necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of this item
and implement and administer the Neighborhood Economic Development Program
grants according to their terms.
Application and Review Process
NED Program applications may be submitted at any time and are reviewed by City of
Phoenix staff as they are received to determine the eligibility and feasibility of the
proposed project. Successful applications must meet a CDBG National Objective in
accordance with HUD program regulations.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Community and Cultural Investment
Subcommittee on May 4, 2022, by a 4-0 vote.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.
Page 134
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Programs (Ordinance S-48602)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, accept, and if
awarded, enter into any necessary agreements to implement the Neighborhood
Services Department (NSD) grant-funded Housing Rehabilitation Programs. Further
request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to
disburse, all funds related to this item. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Summary
The Neighborhood Services Department (NSD) manages housing rehabilitation
projects that enhance the quality of life for low- and moderate-income property owners
and tenants by rehabilitating single- and multi-family owner- and tenant-occupied
properties to address health and safety hazards, and promote conservation,
sustainability, and energy efficiency to support and revitalize communities. Housing
rehabilitation projects are funded through a variety of federal, state, and local grant
funds, outlined below.
· U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME)
funds used to fund housing rehabilitation contracts between low- and moderate-
income property owners and contractors on the Approved Contractor List (ACL).
These contracts may also be supplemented with funding from the U.S. Department
of Energy, utility providers, and other state and local agencies.
· HUD Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Home (OLHCHH) funding supports
NSD's Lead Safe Program and its ongoing efforts to provide lead testing and lead
hazard remediation services in single- and multi-family housing units built before
1978 and occupied by low-income families with pregnant women and or children
under six years of age. The OLHCHH competitive grant applications fund the Lead
Safe Phoenix program, in partnership with the Maricopa County Department of
Public Health, and funds direct contracts with environmental consulting firms.
· U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Energy
Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) funds provided through the Arizona
Department of Housing, Arizona Public Service, Salt River Project, Southwest Gas,
Page 135
the Utility Repair, Replacement and Deposit program, the Low-Income Home
Energy Assistance Program and Wildfire support NSD's continuous commitment of
providing weatherization assistance services. These services include installation of
attic insulation, sunscreens, duct sealing, room pressure relief/air balancing, and
the repair or replacement of heating and cooling systems in owner-occupied and
rental households that meet federal poverty guidelines.
NSD will maintain an ACL to enhance the number of eligible small businesses. To be
added to the ACL and be eligible to participate as a housing rehabilitation contractor,
receive bid opportunities, and perform construction services on housing rehabilitation
projects, contractors must be screened and qualified on an individual basis and must
meet and maintain all eligibility requirements set forth within the NSD Housing Rehab
Contractor Application Packet found on the NSD website. The ACL will be continuously
open to local contractors that meet the applicable criteria in the Contractor Application
Packet to promote small business participation. Contractors on the ACL will be
selected to submit bids on a rotating basis.
NSD seeks authorization to proceed with all actions necessary or appropriate to
implement and administer its grant-funded Housing Rehabilitation programs, including
applying for and accepting up to $16,045,000 in funding. NSD expects to be awarded
approximately:
· $6 million in CDBG funds;
· $4 million in WAP funds;
· $970,000 in OLHCHH funds;
· $575,000 in HOME funds; and
· Up to $4.5 million in the City's second tranche of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
funds.
Actions include:
· If awarded, enter into any necessary contracts or agreements with the grantor(s) to
fund existing and future contracts in accordance with the grant terms.
· Enter into and amend contracts with eligible property owners to perform
rehabilitation services; enter into contracts with private contractors; issue Request
for Proposals, Request for Qualifications, Calls for Interest, and Requests for Bids
for Housing Rehabilitation Program services; award, negotiate, and execute
contracts with the successful responders; and negotiate and/or amend existing
contracts with various contractors and service providers to perform work on eligible
housing and rental rehabilitation projects.
Page 136
· Maintain an ACL of qualified contractors to enter into agreements with low- and
moderate-income property owners funded by NSD pursuant to the grant terms.
These funds may be disbursed to the property owner or contractor.
· Take all other action necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of this item
and implement and administer the Housing Rehabilitation Program grants according
to their terms.
Procurement Information
As needed to implement and administer NSD's Housing Rehabilitation Programs,
services may be procured using procurement procedures in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10.
Financial Impact
These programs are funded with federal, state and local grants. There is no impact to
the General Fund.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Community and Cultural Investment
Subcommittee on May 4, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.
Public Outreach
The ACL and/or other procurement opportunities will be advertised in local print media
and will also be posted on NSD's website.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.
Page 137
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance S-48596)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Arizona artist Bobby Zokaites for an amount not to exceed $50,000 to design public art
streetscape enhancements for the North 32nd Street Improvements Project along the
North 32nd Street Pedestrian Corridor from Cheryl Drive to Cholla Street in North
Phoenix. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item.
Summary
The Fiscal Year 2021-26 Public Art Project Plan includes a project to work with the
community, Street Transportation and Water Services departments to enhance the
design of North 32nd Street following the Drought Pipeline Project. The artist will be
expected to work with the Street Transportation Department Project team to integrate
public art throughout the improvements such as sidewalks, landscape, bus stops, or
sculptures, enhancing the overall pedestrian experience throughout the site.
On January 28, 2022, a five-person artist selection panel reviewed a pool of 86
applicants who responded to the project's open Request for Qualifications. Mr.
Zokaites was recommended based on his experience in creating impactful public art
projects, his demonstrated ability to involve the community in meaningful ways, and his
potential to create a site-specific concept for this community.
The selection panel included Ruri Yampolsky, Waterfront Program Manager, Seattle
Office of Arts and Culture; Rick Ross, Dean, Shadow Mountain High School; Wylwyn
Reyes, Public Art Project Manager, Arts Foundation of Tucson and Southern Arizona;
Allison Barnett, community representative; and John Dickson, Project Manager, City of
Phoenix Streets Transportation Department.
Financial Impact
The North 32nd Street Improvements Project is one of 40 projects in the Fiscal Year
2021-26 Public Art Project Plan that City Council approved on June 23, 2021. The
proposed $50,000 design contract will cover all costs for the artist to work with City
staff, Project Engineering and Design Consultants, and the Office of Arts and Culture
Page 138
to produce a complete and buildable design. It will also include any additional work to
engage the community during the design phase of the project. The percent-for-art
funds for this project come from the Street Transportation and Water Services
departments Capital Improvement Program.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Arts and Culture Commission reviewed and recommended approval of
this item at its March 8, 2022, meeting. The Community and Cultural Investment
Subcommittee reviewed and approved this item by a 4-0 vote at its April 6, 2022
meeting.
Location
Council District: 3
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Office of Arts
and Culture.
Page 139
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Requirements Contract - IFB 18-053 (Ordinance S-48594)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 147807 with Leslies Poolmart, Inc. for the purchase of
swimming pool maintenance supplies, accessories and repair parts for the Parks and
Recreation Department. Further request authorization for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$150,000.
Summary
The Parks and Recreation Department manages 29 aquatic facilities with 45 separate
bodies of water located throughout the City. Staff requires various commercial grade
swimming pool parts, supplies and equipment to perform maintenance activities on
multiple systems, including but not limited to, filtration system, pumps, impellor,
motors, chemical injection systems and other swimming pool maintenance supplies,
accessories and repair parts to enhance and support the quality of these facilities
which are utilized by residents of Phoenix. Additional funds are needed to purchase
supplies for the upcoming pool season, including a substantial amount of chemicals
which have increased in price by over 50 percent over the past year. Without the ability
to purchase pool supplies the department would be unable to repair and maintain
these facilities.
Contract Term
The contract term is June 7, 2018 through June 6, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $150,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $775,000. Funds are available in the Parks and Recreation
Department's budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This contract was originally approved by City Council on June 6, 2018.
Page 140
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Page 141
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Series 2022 (Resolution 22019)
Requests City Council approval for the issuance of Health Care Facilities Revenue
Bonds (CFP Sherman Hospital, LLC), Series 2022, to be issued in one or more tax-
exempt and taxable series in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$300,000,000.
Summary
Request City Council adoption of a resolution granting approval of the proceedings
under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, AZ., (the
"Phoenix IDA") has previously resolved to issue up to $300,000,000 of Health Care
Facilities Revenue Bonds (the "Revenue Bonds") for use by CFP Sherman Hospital,
LLC (the "Borrower"), an Arizona limited liability company, to
a) finance acquisition, construction, and equipping of a facility providing medical
services in Sherman, Texas, and
b) pay certain costs related to the issuance of the Revenue Bonds.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Revenue Bonds at its
meeting held on April 21, 2022.
Location
The Project is located at Crossroads Development on the northeast corner of Highway
76 and Travis Street, in Sherman, Texas.
With the exception of certain housing bonds, the Phoenix IDA can finance projects
located anywhere in Arizona. In addition, the Phoenix IDA may issue bonds to finance
projects outside of Arizona, if the out-of-state project provides a benefit within the
State.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.
Page 142
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance S-48553)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Dignity Health (Dignity), on behalf of Dignity's St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical
Center and its Barrow Neurological Institute, for a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) Program.
Authorization also is requested for the City Treasurer to accept funds from Dignity for
associated Phoenix Fire Department (PFD) dispatch and communication services
(dispatch through 9-1-1).
Summary
The objective of the MSU Program is pre-hospital, "ASAP" diagnosis and possible
administration of the "clot-busting" drug tPa (tissue plasminogen activator) to stroke
patients in the field prior to, or during, hospital transport. The objective is to treat stroke
patients to potentially improve neurological recovery and outcomes.
Stroke is the fifth leading cause of death in the U.S. and the leading cause of adult
disability. According to Barrow, more than 800,000 strokes occur annually in the United
States. With approximately 8,000 patients in Maricopa County, 5,500 are within the
MSU response map (20 minutes), and approximately 2,500 are estimated to be
systemic intravenous thrombolytic-eligible stroke patients who could benefit from this
revolutionary, life-saving treatment. Further, the probability of a "good outcome" is
reduced by 10 percent every 30 minutes that treatment is not provided. The safe time
frame to treat stroke patients with the "clot-buster" drug tPa is limited to less than 4.5
hours from the onset of symptoms. Currently, approximately five percent of stroke
patients receive tPa at all, and less than one percent within one hour.
The MSU Program will logistically provide that calls for assistance would be received
by Fire 9-1-1, and both PFD and the MSU would be dispatched according to a 20-
minute response map within Phoenix, based on Dignity's location. If the assessed
patient is eligible, MSU would administer the tPa IV and the patient would be
transported by PFD to the closest appropriate stroke patient treatment facility as
determined by the treating physician in collaboration with PFD paramedic personnel.
Page 143
Contract Term
The contract term is May 18, 2022 through May 17, 2027. This request is for an
agreement with Dignity Health, on behalf of Dignity's St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical
Center and its Barrow Neurological Institute. This contract will be non-exclusive. It is
intended that other medical entities will have the opportunity to contract with PFD in
the future, in an effort to expand the Mobile Stroke Program to ensure more
comprehensive citywide coverage.
Financial Impact
The City will be reimbursed by Dignity for all associated dispatch and communication
services (911). Dignity will provide its own vehicle, staffing, and all other necessary
equipment.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 144
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Fiscal Year 2022-23 (Ordinance S-48588)
Request authorization for the City Manager to adopt the Fire Department's Fiscal Year
2022-23 Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) fees and Regional Wireless Network 800
MHz Infrastructure payments to be charged to: (1) the cities of Avondale, Buckeye,
Chandler, El Mirage, Glendale, Goodyear, Maricopa, Peoria, Scottsdale, Surprise,
Tempe, and Tolleson; (2) the fire districts of Buckeye Valley, Daisy Mountain,
Harquahala, and Sun City; (3) the Towns of Guadalupe and Paradise Valley; (4)
Arizona Fire and Medical Authority; and (5) Dignity Health. Further request to authorize
the City Treasurer to accept and for the City Controller to disburse these funds.
Summary
In 2019, the City Council approved Intergovernmental Agreements (IGAs) with each of
the above fire jurisdictions, which included CAD fees and charges to be updated
annually as "Exhibit A" (attached). The City of Phoenix has Automatic and/or Mutual
Aid Agreements with these jurisdictions and provides dispatching for their fire and
emergency medical units. Each CAD member pays a dispatching fee for each call
dispatched, as well as charges for equipment and network maintenance.
Financial Impact
The General Fund revenue to be generated from these IGAs for Fiscal Year 2022-23 is
estimated at $8,262,832 and is intended to offset a portion of the operating costs of the
City's Regional Dispatch Center, including salaries of Dispatch Center staff. The
$5,248,878 balance of the funds collected pays for communications system and
equipment maintenance and modernization.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.
Page 145
Phoenix Fire Department
FY 2022-2023 Projected Total CAD Revenues
Exhibit A Fees for Technical Services
CAD Partner Revenue
Arizona Fire & Medical Authority 756,900.89
City of Avondale 664,494.01
City of Buckeye 418,943.89
Buckeye Valley Fire District 429,882.37
City of Chandler 1,353,281.91
Daisy Mountain Fire District 351,185.38
City of El Mirage 220,361.00
City of Glendale 1,954,938.56
City of Goodyear 704,070.40
Town of Guadalupe 156,391.64
Harquahala Fire District 31,753.95
City of Maricopa 425,633.81
Town of Paradise Valley 92,398.80
City of Peoria 1,052,927.50
City of Scottsdale 2,084,932.97
Sun City Fire District 554,623.84
City of Surprise 885, 837.62
City of Tempe 1,169,264.55
City of Tolleson 166,927.23
Dignity Health 36,960.00
Total FY 2022-2023 13,511,710.32
Page 146
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance S-48556)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
3H Service System, Inc., to purchase Custodial Services for the Police Department.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The aggregate contract value will not exceed $7,100,000.
Summary
The Police Department is contracting for custodial services to maintain 24 facilities in a
clean and hygienic state to promote the health and safety of employees and members
of the public. Custodial services support the City's objective to provide public safety
workers with the facilities necessary to professionally meet City and regional public
safety needs and best serve residents.
Procurement Information
RFP 22-067 was conducted in accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10. There
were 11 offers received by the Procurement Division on Feb. 9, 2022. The notification
was sent to 252 suppliers and was publicly posted and available for download from the
City's website.
The proposals were scored by a five member evaluation panel based on the following
criteria:
Method of Approach - 400
Experience and Qualifications - 300
Capacity - 200
Price - 100
The Assistant Finance Director recommends that the offer from 3H Service System,
Inc., be accepted as the highest scored, responsive, and responsible offer that is most
advantageous to the City.
Contract Term
The contract will begin on July 1, 2022. The initial term of the contract will be for two
years with three one-year options to extend.
Page 147
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $7,100,000. Funds are available in the
Police Department's budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Finance and Police
departments.
Page 148
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
2021-22 - Amendment (Ordinance S-48598)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
Agreements: 152003 with AECOM Technical Services, Inc.; 152004 with The Cadmus
Group, LLC; and 152007 with Gresham Smith, to provide continued Sustainability On-
Call Consulting Services for the Aviation Department. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreements as necessary within the Council-
approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional fee for services included in these
amendments will not exceed $150,000 each.
Summary
The purpose of these amendments is to provide continued Sustainability On-Call
Consulting Services for Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Phoenix Deer Valley
Airport and Phoenix Goodyear Airport.
These amendments provide additional funds to the agreements and are necessary to
complete the application for Airport Carbon Accreditation Level 4, Roadmap to Net
Zero Carbon and the Sustainability Management Plan update, which were accelerated
from the previous schedule.
Contract Term
The term of each agreement remains unchanged. Work scope identified and
incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the
parties, and work may extend past the termination of the agreement. No additional
changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The initial agreement for each of the Sustainability On-Call Consulting Services was
approved for an amount not to exceed $300,000, including all subconsultant and
reimbursable costs. This amendment will increase each agreement by an additional
$150,000, for a new total amount not to exceed $450,000, including all subconsultant
and reimbursable costs.
Page 149
Funding for these amendments is available in the Aviation Department's Capital
Improvement Program and Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department
will review and approve funding availability prior to issuance of any On-Call task order
of $100,000 or more. Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered
agreement services, which may extend past the agreement termination.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Sustainability On-Call Consulting Services Agreements
152003, 152004 and 152007 (Ordinance S-46555) on May 6, 2020.
Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, Ariz.
Council Districts: 1, 8 and Out of City
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Aviation
Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 150
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Plan
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to submit an updated Airport
Layout Plan to the Federal Aviation Administration for the Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport Comprehensive Asset Management Plan, as needed, based on
recent implementation planning.
Summary
Since the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Comprehensive Asset Management
Plan (CAMP) was adopted in 2019, a multitude of changes have impacted the
implementation of CAMP. Of particular note, negotiations with Union Pacific Railroad
have not advanced and the Air National Guard no longer believes replacement of their
refueling aircraft will occur in the near term. Moreover, COVID-19 has affected various
aspects of both aero- and non-aeronautical demand. Given these changes, the
Aviation Department determined it appropriate to revalidate and update the 2019
CAMP to ensure near term objectives remained appropriate. Staff conducted outreach
and incorporated feedback from stakeholders including airlines, cargo operators and
the Federal Aviation Administration. The update to CAMP emphasizes seven key
projects over the next five years:
· A second north concourse at Terminal 3 and related processor improvements;
· A post-security passenger connector between Terminal 3 and Terminal 4;
· A cross-airfield taxiway (Taxiway U);
· Reuse of a Terminal 2 support building;
· A runway extension to balance runway usage and optimize airport capacity;
· Sky Harbor Boulevard improvements to address roadway congestion; and
· A new on-airport hotel in the terminal core that is proposed to be privately
developed, owned, and managed.
Staff anticipates that three projects: Taxiway U; second concourse at Terminal 3; and
the Terminal 3 and Terminal 4 connector would be eligible for Bipartisan Infrastructure
Law funding to support construction.
A CAMP Implementation Summary Map is included in Attachment A.
Page 151
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on April 20, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval of this item on Feb. 17,
2022, by a vote of 9-0.
Public Outreach
Various technical stakeholders including the Federal Aviation Administration, Air
National Guard and air carriers have been engaged in the update process.
Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.
Page 152
Attachment A
Page 153
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amendment (Ordinance S-48552)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 147824 with ANCO Sanitation Systems, Inc., to provide additional funding for
preventative maintenance and repair services of trash compactors and balers for the
Aviation, Phoenix Convention Center and Public Works departments. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures included in this amendment will not exceed $113,000.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional funding for the Terminal 4
South 1 Concourse that was not part of the original bid. The additional expenditures
will provide capacity to support necessary refurbishments to trash compactors and
balers to extend their useful life span, saving money over this time period.
The contract provides preventative maintenance and repair services for trash
compactors and balers at various locations for the Aviation, Phoenix Convention
Center, and Public Works departments.
Contract Term
The contract term will remain unchanged, ending May 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for Contract 147824 was for an expenditure not-to-exceed
$285,000. This amendment will increase the authorization for the contract by an
additional $113,000, for a new total not-to-exceed contract value of $398,000.
Funding is available in the Aviation, Phoenix Convention Center, and Public Works
departments' budgets.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Contract 147824 (Ordinance S-44636) on June 6, 2018.
Page 154
Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.;
Phoenix Convention Center - 100 N. 3rd St.; and
Various Public Works Department locations.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua, Inger Erickson and
Karen Peters, and the Aviation, Phoenix Convention Center and Public Works
departments.
Page 155
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance S-48561)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 132424 with SITA Information Networking Computing USA, Inc. to provide
additional time and funding to the contract for ongoing maintenance and support
services of the Common Use Systems at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures included in this amendment will not exceed
$6,912,327.
Summary
The Airport operates several Common Use Systems to provide timely flight updates
and gate information to passengers, perform critical check-in and boarding operations
and allow the Airport, airlines, and other stakeholders to run the day-to-day Airport
operations. These systems allow use of a single set of technology infrastructure for all
participating airlines instead of each airline needing its proprietary systems to process
passengers. The Common Use Systems are critical for the Airport by giving the
Aviation Department (Aviation) maximum flexibility and ability to maximize capacity.
The extension will ensure Aviation is able to have adequate onsite and remote
technical support, software, and hardware licensing needed to effectively operate and
manage these systems without any operational disruption to the Airport.
SITA is the only authorized support and maintenance provider of the Common Use
Systems at the Airport. Maintenance and technical support are necessary for
addressing any issues that arise during the ongoing use of the Common Use Systems.
Inability to extend the support contract will pose significant disruptions to Airport
operations with the loss of necessary software and hardware licensing needed to run
these systems. The inability to access technical support for maintenance or repairs for
issues that arise will cause additional problems for Airport operations.
The scope of common use operations at the Airport has significantly grown as part of
the Terminal 3 Modernization program. Terminal 3 runs full common use operations
and all airline ticket counter positions, check-in kiosks, and airline gates use Common
Use Systems. The useful life of the infrastructure that supports the common use
Page 156
environment is 7-10 years. Currently, the Airport is still depreciating the initial capital
investment made in these systems. There is significant remaining useful life of the
Common Use Systems in the Airport.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Contract Term
This amendment will extend the end date of the contract term from May 31, 2022 to
May 31, 2027.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for Contract 132424 was authorized for an expenditure not-to-
exceed $2,316,265. Amendments increased the authorization for the contract by
$8,103,664. This amendment will increase the authorization for the contract by an
additional $6,912,327, for a new total not-to-exceed contract value of $17,332,256.
Funding is available in the Aviation Department's budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Professional Technology Services Common Use System Contract 132424 on Aug.
31, 2011;
· Professional Technology Services Common Use System Contract 132424 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-39259) on Oct. 17, 2012;
· Professional Technology Services Common Use System Contract 132424 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-40932) on June 4, 2014;
· Professional Technology Services Common Use System Contract 132424 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-42248) on Jan. 6, 2016; and
· Professional Technology Services Common Use System Contract 132424 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-45524) on April 3, 2019.
Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.
Page 157
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Inspection/Certification of Precision Approach Path Indicator Systems at
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - AV31000091 (Ordinance S-48582)
Request authorization to execute a Reimbursable Agreement with the Federal Aviation
Administration for the flight inspection/certification of the Precision Approach Path
Indicator Systems at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport AV31000091. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse the necessary funds related to this item. The
fee for services will not exceed $30,000.
Summary
The purpose of this project is to upgrade the Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI)
Systems for Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT). The systems will be out of service for a
period of time until Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) flight inspection/certification
can take place. Under the Reimbursable Agreement, FAA staff will perform a flight
inspection and certification after the work is completed. This flight inspection and
certification process is necessary to put PAPI Systems into operation and maintain
safe air traffic services at DVT. This agreement is essential to the health, safety, and
welfare of the public and critical operations for the City.
Financial Impact
Reimbursement to the FAA will not exceed $30,000.
Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget.
Location
702 W. Deer Valley Road Suite A
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.
Page 158
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Airport New Apron and Taxiway Connector Project - AV41000077 (Ordinance S-
48601)
Request authorization to execute a Reimbursable Agreement with the Federal Aviation
Administration for the Phoenix Goodyear Airport relocation of the existing weather
station for the New Apron and Taxiway Connector project AV41000077. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
fee for services will not exceed $50,000.
Summary
The New Apron and Taxiway Connector project currently underway at Phoenix
Goodyear Airport requires the relocation of the existing weather station. Under the
Reimbursable Agreement, this requires Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to
perform technical consulting, site visits, feasibility, and other technical support. This
FAA support is necessary to allow construction of the new parking apron and to
minimize outages of weather reporting capability. This agreement is essential for the
health, safety, and welfare of the public and critical operations for the City.
Financial Impact
Reimbursement to the FAA will not exceed $50,000.
Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Project budget.
Location
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, Ariz.
Council District: Out of City
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.
Page 159
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Executive Hangar Lease 138896 with DP64, LLC located at Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport to extend the term for five years with three one-year options, for a
total extension of up to eight years.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to extend the term of the lease for five years with
three one-year options, for a total extension of up to eight years, to be exercised at the
sole discretion of the Director of Aviation Services.
The City of Phoenix and DP64, LLC entered into Executive Hangar Lease 138896 on
July 1, 2014 for Executive Hangar 26. The Lease is scheduled to terminate on Dec.
31, 2022. DP64, LLC is requesting to extend the term of the lease. The hangar is used
for the storage and allowed maintenance of DP64, LLC’s approved aircraft and for no
other use or purpose without the consent of the Aviation Director.
Contract Term
This amendment will extend the end date of the lease from Dec. 31, 2022 to Dec. 31,
2027, plus three additional one-year options to extend, to be exercised at the sole
discretion of the Aviation Director.
Financial Impact
Current rent is approximately $38,005 per year ($3,167 monthly). Total rent over the
extended term of the lease will be approximately $304,040. Rent will continue to be
adjusted annually based on the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Consumer Price Index (CPI)
or three percent, whichever is greater.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Executive Hangar Lease 138896 (Ordinance S-40620) on March 19, 2014; and
· Executive Hangar Lease 138896 - Amendment (Ordinance S-45616) on May 1,
2019.
Page 160
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval of this item on March 17,
2022, by a vote of 9-0.
Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3705 E. Air Lane
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.
Page 161
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Executive Hangar Lease 147168 with Empire Airlines, Inc. located at Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport to extend the term for five years with three one-year
options, for a total extension of up to eight years.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to extend the term of the lease for five years with
three one-year options, for a total extension of up to eight years, to be exercised at the
sole discretion of the Aviation Director.
Empire Airlines, Inc. (Empire) entered into Executive Hangar Lease 147168 on July 1,
2014 for Executive Hangar 25. The Lease is scheduled to terminate on Dec. 31, 2022.
Empire is requesting to extend the term of the lease for five years with three one-year
options, for a total extension of up to eight years. The hangar is used for the storage
and allowed maintenance of Empire’s approved aircraft and for no other use or
purpose without the consent of the Aviation Director.
Contract Term
This amendment will extend the date of the lease from Dec. 31, 2022 to Dec. 31, 2027,
plus three additional one-year options to extend, to be exercised at the sole discretion
of the Aviation Director.
Financial Impact
Current rent is approximately $37,830 per year ($3,152 monthly). Total rent over the
extended term of the lease will be approximately $302,640. Rent will continue to be
adjusted annually based on the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Consumer Price Index (CPI)
or three percent, whichever is greater.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Executive Hangar Lease 147168 (Ordinance S-40620) on March 19, 2014; and
· Executive Hangar Lease 147168 - Amendment (Ordinance S-45612) on May 1,
Page 162
2019.
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended this item for approval on March
17, 2022, by a vote of 9-0.
Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3703 E. Air Lane
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.
Page 163
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
48607)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
Executive Hangar Leases 146544 and 146543 with Jackson Jet Center, LLC, located
at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, to extend the terms for five years with
three one-year options, for total extensions of up to eight years.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to extend the terms of leases for five years with
three one-year options, for total extensions of up to eight years, to be exercised at the
sole discretion of the Aviation Director.
Leases 146544 and 146543 for Executive Hangars 24 and 29, respectively. On Jan.
26, 2022, Jackson Jet Center (Jackson) purchased Swift at Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport (PHX). Executive Hangar Leases 146544 and 146543 terms
allowed the leases to be assigned and assumed with written approval from the Aviation
Director. On Jan. 11, 2022, PHX executed a Consent to Assignment agreement for
both hangars. Both Leases terminate on Dec. 31, 2022. The hangars are used for the
storage and allowed maintenance of Jackson’s approved aircraft and for no other use
or purpose without the consent of the Aviation Director.
Contract Term
These amendments will extend the end dates of the leases from Dec. 31, 2022 to Dec.
31, 2027, plus three additional one-year options to extend, to be exercised at the sole
discretion of the Aviation Director.
Financial Impact
Current rent for each lease is approximately $33,969 per year ($2,830 monthly), and
$67,938 combined ($5,661 monthly). Combined total rent over the term of the leases
will be approximately $543,504, if all options are executed. Rent will continue to be
adjusted annually based on the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Consumer Price Index (CPI)
or three percent, whichever is greater.
Page 164
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Executive Hangar Leases 146544 and 146543 (Ordinance
S-43539) on May 31, 2017.
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended this item for approval on March
17, 2022, by a vote of 9-0.
Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3701 and 3711 E. Air Lane
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.
Page 165
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Executive Hangar Leases 139057 and 151621 with Papa Sierra, LLC, located at
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to extend the terms for five years with three
one-year options, for total extensions of up to eight years.
Summary
The purpose of these amendments is to extend the terms of the leases for five years
with three one-year options, for a total extension of up to eight years, to be exercised
at the sole discretion of the Aviation Director.
Papa Sierra, LLC (Papa Sierra) entered into Executive Hangar Lease 139057 on July
1, 2014 at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport for Executive Hangar 28.
Additionally, Papa Sierra entered into Executive Hangar Lease 151621 on Feb. 1,
2020 for Executive Hangar 27. Both Leases are scheduled to terminate on Dec. 31,
2022. Papa Sierra is requesting to extend the term for both leases. The hangars are
used for the storage and allowed maintenance of Papa Sierra’s approved aircraft and
for no other use or purpose without the consent of the Aviation Director.
Contract Term
These amendments will extend the end date of the lease terms from Dec. 31, 2022 to
Dec. 31, 2027, plus three additional one-year options to extend, to be exercised at the
sole discretion of the Aviation Director.
Financial Impact
Current rent for lease 139057 is approximately $37,830 per year ($3,152 monthly).
Current rent for lease 151621 is approximately $37,763 per year ($3,147 monthly).
Total rent over the extended term for both leases will be approximately $604,744. Rent
will continue to be adjusted annually based on the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale
Consumer Price Index or three percent, whichever is greater.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Executive Hangar Lease139057 (Ordinance S-40620) on March 19, 2014;
Page 166
· Executive Hangar Lease 139057 - Amendment (Ordinance S-45613) on May 1,
2019; and
· Executive Hangar Lease 151621 (Ordinance S-46176) on Nov. 20, 2019.
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended this item for approval on March
17, 2022, by a vote of 9-0.
Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3707 and 3709 E. Air Lane
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.
Page 167
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Extension Project Utility Relocation Services - WS85500330 and WS90500224
(Ordinance S-48595)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Valley Metro Rail, Inc., to address relocation of Water and Wastewater facilities
that are impacted by construction of the South Central/Downtown Hub Light Rail
Extension Project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority, as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
This agreement will not exceed $17.45 million.
Summary
The Water Services Department (WSD) owns water and wastewater infrastructure
throughout the South Central/Downtown Hub Light Rail Extension (SCE) Project Area.
In several locations the infrastructure needs to be relocated to meet Valley Metro Rail,
Inc. and City of Phoenix standards. Valley Metro Rail, regional and typical industry
standards require infrastructure to be within 10 feet of the centerline of the track.
These relocations are paid for as part of the SCE Project using federal, Proposition
400 or Transit 2050 funds. To ensure optimal placement of infrastructure and reliable
delivery of water and wastewater services, WSD has an additional standard to review
and relocate infrastructure within 16 feet of the centerline of the track. Infrastructure
relocations outside of the Valley Metro Rail standard will be paid for by WSD's Capital
Improvement Program funds.
Based on the SCE Project’s current design, there is existing water and wastewater
infrastructure within the impacted construction area that needs to be relocated to meet
standards and comply with the SCE Project schedule.
Valley Metro Rail will relocate the affected facilities through the use of a procured
contractor, and the City will reimburse Valley Metro Rail for construction costs
associated with the relocations.
Contract Term
The term of this agreement is through June 30, 2026.
Page 168
Financial Impact
The agreement value will not exceed $17.45 million.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Capital Improvement Program
budget.
Location
The Light Rail Transit Project is located along Central Avenue from Washington Street
to Baseline Road. The construction area also includes McKinley Street between
Central and 1st Avenues, and the area between Monroe and Grant Streets from 3rd
Avenue to 5th Street.
Council Districts: 7 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Public Transit and Water Services departments.
Page 169
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Services (Ordinance S-48610)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Valley Metro Rail, Inc. to pay the City of Phoenix’s share of light rail and agency
operating costs for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The agreement's value will not
exceed $29,713,000.
Summary
The operations and maintenance budget of Valley Metro Rail, Inc. (VMR) includes
costs for: transportation contractors; propulsion power; vehicle maintenance;
systems/facilities maintenance, materials, and supplies; VMR staff; safety; consultants;
regional customer services; utilities; liability insurance; and general and administrative
expenses.
Financial Impact
For Fiscal Year 2022-23, the City’s total estimated share of VMR’s costs is
$48,494,000, broken down as follows:
· Agency costs - $1,104,000; and
· Operating costs for light rail service - $47,390,000.
The City's share of operating costs will be offset with $18,781,000 in federal funds
received by VMR through the Federal Transit Administration under the American
Rescue Plan Act, for a remainder of $29,713,000.
Funding is available in the Public Transit Department's Operating budget using
Transportation 2050 funds.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.
Page 170
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Partnership, Formerly Verizon Wireless (VAW), LLC (Ordinance S-48577)
Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments
to License Agreements 126578 and 141668 with Cellco Partnership, successor-in-
interest to Verizon Wireless (VAW), LLC (Verizon Wireless) to add antennas at the 324
W. Adams St. and 305 W. Washington St. parking garages.
Summary
Verizon Wireless plans to add antennas at the parking garages located at 324 W.
Adams St. and 305 W. Washington St. to expand and improve service coverage in the
downtown area. The monthly license fee for each location will increase by $750 per
antenna per month which is within the range of market rents as determined by the
Real Estate Division.
Agreement 126578 will be amended to add three antennas at the 324 W. Adams St.
parking garage. The license fee will increase to $6,803.05 per month, plus applicable
taxes, beginning June 1, 2022, and will increase by three percent beginning Aug. 1,
2022, and three percent annually thereafter. All other terms and conditions will remain
the same.
Agreement 141668 will be amended to add four antennas at the 305 W. Washington
St. parking garage. The license fee will increase to $8,015.02 per month, plus
applicable taxes, beginning June 1, 2022, and will increase by three percent beginning
Nov. 1, 2022, and three percent annually thereafter. All other terms and conditions will
remain the same.
Contract Term
Agreement 126578 has two years and two months remaining on current term of the
contract, through July 31, 2024, with one, five-year option to extend through July 31,
2029.
Agreement 141668 has three years and five months remaining on the current term of
the contract, through Oct. 31, 2025, with no options remaining.
Page 171
Financial Impact
Agreement 126578 - Anticipated revenue for the first year beginning June 1, 2022, is
$83,678 per year.
Agreement 141668 - Anticipated revenue for the first year beginning June 1, 2022, is
$97,863 per year.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Verizon Wireless Adams Street Parking Garage License Agreement 126578
(Ordinance S-35981) on April 1, 2009;
1. Verizon Wireless Adams Street Parking Garage License Agreement 126578 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-38304) on Nov. 16, 2011;
2. Verizon Wireless Adams Street Parking Garage License Agreement 126578 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-39608) on Feb. 20, 2013;
3. Verizon Wireless Adams Street Parking Garage License Agreement 126578 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-40188) on Sept. 4, 2013;
4. Verizon Wireless Adams Street Parking Garage License Agreement 126578 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-45556) on April 17, 2019; and
· Verizon Wireless 305 Parking Garage License Agreement 141668 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-41634) on April 22, 2015.
Location
324 W. Adams and 305 W. Washington streets.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager Karen
Peters and the Public Works and Finance departments.
Page 172
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Wireless, L.L.C. (Ordinance S-48575)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a license with
Dish Wireless, L.L.C., for communication equipment at 424 W. Adams St. Further
request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this item. The
license fee is $32,250 annually during the initial term.
Summary
Dish Wireless, L.L.C. (Dish) will license approximately 150 square feet of roof space
for cabinet equipment and to install three exterior wall mounted antennas at 424 W.
Adams St. for communication equipment. The term of the license is for five years, with
two additional five-year automatic renewals. The monthly license fee is based on $35
per square foot per year for rooftop space plus $750 per antenna per month for a total
of $2,687.50, plus applicable taxes, and will increase annually by 3.5 percent. The
license fee is within the range of market rents as determined by the Real Estate
Division.
Dish is responsible for all costs related to construction, operation, and maintenance
including but not limited to permits, utilities, and environmental compliance. The
equipment will be secured and screened in accordance with zoning requirements. The
license will include insurance and indemnity provisions acceptable to the City's Risk
Management Division and City Attorney. The license may be canceled pursuant to
A.R.S. 38-511. The license may contain other terms and conditions deemed necessary
by the City.
Contract Term
The initial term of the license is five years. The license will automatically renew for two
additional five-year terms, unless either party notifies the other in writing 60 days in
advance of its intention not to renew.
Financial Impact
The annual license fee is $32,250, plus applicable taxes, during the initial term and will
increase 3.5 percent annually. After the completion of the initial term, the City may, at
its sole and absolute discretion, renegotiate the license fee to remain consistent with
Page 173
market standards.
Location
424 W. Adams St.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
and Finance departments.
Page 174
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance S-48564)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
contracts with: American Inspection and Test, Inc. and Diversified Inspections/ITL, Inc.,
for inspection and certification of aerial equipment. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. This item will have an
aggregate amount of $452,835.
Summary
The Aviation and Public Works departments are seeking inspection and certification
services for various aerial equipment, including bucket trucks, personnel lifts, forklifts,
and derricks. Annual inspections are essential to maintain safe and efficient operations
of aerial equipment. Inspections must be performed by certified third-party equipment
inspectors pursuant to National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), American National
Standards Institute (ANSI), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) standards.
Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid (IFB) 23-FSD-003 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. The Public Works Department reached out to 63 vendors, with two
bids being received. Both bids were evaluated based on responsiveness and
responsibility with both vendors recommended for award for each of the below groups:
Group I - Fire Apparatus Aerial Equipment group total:
Diversified Inspections - $30,000 group total
American Inspection and Test - no bid
Group II - Insulated/Non-Insulated Bucket Trucks and Digger Derricks group total:
American Inspection and Test - $12,200
Diversified Inspections - $17,995
Group III - Mobile Truck Mounted Cranes
Diversified Inspections - $3,120
American Inspection and Test - $3,600
Page 175
Group IV - Man Lifts, Forklifts, and Industrial Lift Trucks group total:
American Inspection and Test - $9,000
Diversified Inspections - $14,625
Group V - Derrick Well Rigs group total:
Diversified Inspections - $780
American Inspection and Test - $900
Contract Term
This contract will begin on or about July 1, 2022 for an initial one-year term, with four
option years to be exercised in increments of up to one-year, for a total contract term
of five years.
Financial Impact
This item will have an estimated yearly aggregate of $90,567, with a total aggregate of
$452,835.
Funding is available in the Aviation and Public Works departments' budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Aviation and Public Works departments.
Page 176
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
48565)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with B&L Polymers Processing, Inc. for plastics recycling on an as-needed basis.
Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to
disburse, all funds related to this agreement.
Summary
The contractor will receive and collect, shred and recycle damaged residential
containers constructed of various types of plastic that are no longer able to be used
and are outside of the warranty period. Approximately 17,000 containers are taken out
of service each year. The contractor will also receive and collect mixed plastics that
are disposed of at the City's transfer stations, approximately 100-300 tons annually.
The mixed plastics are separated and sorted into 40-cubic-yard metal roll-off boxes to
be hauled to the contractor's place of business either by the department or contractor.
Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid (IFB) 23-SW-005 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. One bid was received on Feb. 23, 2022. The bid was determined to
be responsive and responsible to all terms and conditions and specifications. Contract
revenue pricing is based on various types of plastic and per pound rate, and hauling
rate is per box. The following is a tabulation of the bid received from B&L Polymers
Processing, Inc.:
Group 1 - Plastic Container Recycling
Revenue per pound to the City
$0.0525 per pound - MDPE
$0.0825 per pound - HDPE
$0.0125 per pound - XLPE
$0.0725 per pound - LLDPE
Group 2 - Consumer Plastics Recycling
Revenue per pound to the City
Mixed Rigid Plastics - $0.015 per pound
Page 177
Hauling Fee - 40-cubic-yard roll-off box
27th Ave. Transfer Station - $220.00 per box
North Gateway Transfer Station - $235.00 per box
Contract Term
This contract is to begin on or about June 1, 2022 for one year. Provisions of the
agreement include an option to extend up to four additional years, to be taken in one-
year increments.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value of the revenue generated to the City is approximately
$260,000 with an estimated annual revenue of $52,000. The aggregate expenditure
over the life of the contract is $100,000, with an estimated annual expenditure of
$20,000.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.
Page 178
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
contracts with: First Class Automotive Transport, LLC; Professional Towing &
Recovery, LLC; Quik Pik, LLC; and TnT Towing & Transport, LLC, for fleet towing
services. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related
to this item. The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $2,641,230.
Summary
The Public Works, Aviation, and Public Transit departments request approval to use
these contractors to provide towing services for City-owned vehicles, including buses.
The contractor shall provide all materials, equipment, travel, and personnel. Towing
services play a critical role in the timely response to vehicle breakdowns. Under this
contract, contractors must provide Citywide towing services for light, medium, and
heavy-duty vehicles and public transit buses. These contractors must sustain three
shifts, covering 24 hours a day for seven days a week.
Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid (IFB) 22-FSD-041 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. The Public Works Department reached out to 145 vendors, and there
were four offers received. The bids were evaluated for responsibility and
responsiveness under the specifications, with the vendors below recommended for
award:
Light-Duty Vehicle Tow:
First Class Automotive Transport: $73
TnT Towing & Transport: $75
Professional Towing & Recovery: $100
Quik Pik: $108
Medium-Duty Vehicle Tow:
TnT Towing & Transport: $110
Quik Pik: $168
Professional Towing & Recovery: $195
First Class Automotive Transport: $330
Page 179
Heavy-Duty Vehicle Tow:
TnT Towing & Transport: $150
Quik Pik: $228
First Class Automotive Transport: $330
Professional Towing & Recovery: $525
Public Transit Bus Tow:
TnT Towing & Transport: $150
First Class Automotive Transport: $330
Professional Towing & Recovery: $450
Quik Pik: no bid
Contract Term
Each contract will begin on or about June 1, 2022 for an initial one-year term, with four
option years to be exercised in increments of up to one-year, which allows for a total
contract term of five years.
Financial Impact
These contracts will have an estimated annual expenditure of $528,246, with an
aggregate value of $2,641,230 over the life of the contracts.
Funding is available in the Public Transit, Aviation and Public Works departments'
budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Aviation, Public Transit and Public Works departments.
Page 180
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Pape Group, Inc., DBA Ditch Witch West for purchase of one RT45 Compact Trencher.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total contract value will not exceed $89,948.
Summary
The Public Works Department seeks to purchase one RT45 Compact Trencher for the
Parks and Recreation Department. This compact trencher will be used by the Parks
and Recreation Department for irrigation and backfill work. The current compact
trencher has exceeded its service life and does not meet current requirements to
complete job duties.
Procurement Information
Request for Quote (RFQ) 22-FSD-042 was conducted in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10. The Public Works Department reached out to 47
vendors and received one bid. Ditch Witch West's bid was deemed responsive and
responsible for the below price of one compact trencher.
Ditch Witch West: $89,948
Contract Term
This contract will begin on or about City Council approval on May 11, 2022, for the one
-time purchase of a compact trencher.
Financial Impact
This item will have an estimated total contract value of $89,948.
Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Inger Erickson and Karen Peters and
the Parks and Recreation and Public Works departments.
Page 181
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Impact Plastics Inc. for purchase of four storm-top metal bin covers. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. This item will
have an aggregate amount of $19,940.
Summary
The storm-top bin covers are designed to fit the roll-off collection bins and protect the
contents from weather, including wind and rain. Weather protection is required by the
City's Stormwater Management Plan for these bins if there is an event with potential to
pollute stormwater. Scrap metal can include items that contain residual fluids with the
potential to leak and pool in the bin bottom, which then has the potential to
contaminate stormwater during a rain event. These covers were implemented at two
service centers and were proven to be successful. The Stormwater Executive
Committee approved purchase of four additional covers. These bin covers meet
Environmental Protection Agency regulations and withstand extreme weather
conditions.
Procurement Information
Administrative Regulation 3.10 was waived in lieu of a determination memo citing
without competition due to special circumstances.
Contract Term
This item will be for the one-time purchase of the bin covers starting on or about City
Council approval on May 11, 2022.
Financial Impact
The item will have an aggregate value of $19,940 for the one-time purchase of the four
bin covers.
Funding is available in the Office of Environmental Programs Capital Improvement
Program budget.
Page 182
Location
22nd Avenue Service Center - 2441 S. 22nd Ave.
19th Avenue Fire Resource Fleet Shop - 2625 S. 19th Ave.
Salt River Service Center - 3045 S. 22nd Ave.
Glenrosa Service Center - 4019 W. Glenrosa Ave.
Council Districts: 5, 7 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters, the Office of
Environmental Programs and the Public Works Department.
Page 183
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Resolution 22016)
Request the Phoenix City Council adopt a resolution to exempt certain City vehicles
from displaying the wording, "For Official Use Only" as referenced under Arizona
Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) sections 38-538, 38-538.01 and 38-358.03, for the period of
July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.
Summary
This resolution exempts certain vehicles owned or leased by the City of Phoenix,
including vehicles in the Police, Fire, Human Services, and Aviation departments.
A.R.S. section 38-538.03 stipulates that the governing body may grant such an
exemption for a period of time not to exceed one year. These vehicles are used to
conduct social service programs, investigations, or other confidential activities. The
confidential list required by statute is available to City Council members upon request.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.
Page 184
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amendment (Ordinance S-48568)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 149172 with General Traffic Equipment Corporation, to provide additional
funding for the purchase of traffic signal mounting brackets for the Street
Transportation Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures included in this amendment
will not exceed $150,000.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional funds that are needed due to
an increase in volume of work and rising costs of materials.
This contract allows the Street Transportation Department to acquire mounting arm
brackets for side mount signal heads and for pedestrian signal heads to maintain the
safe and efficient movement of vehicles and pedestrians at intersections throughout
the City. The mounting brackets are needed to maintain existing traffic signals and to
support the expansion of City roadways.
Contract Term
The contract term will remain unchanged, ending on Feb. 28, 2023.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for this contract was for an expenditure not-to-exceed
$205,000. This amendment will increase the authorization for the contract by an
additional $150,000, for a new total not-to-exceed contract value of $355,000.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Contract 149172 (Ordinance S-44167) on Jan. 10, 2018.
Page 185
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 186
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to issue a Request for
Proposals to operate a Comprehensive Micromobility Program in the City of Phoenix.
Summary
The Street Transportation Department is seeking proposals to select two vendors to
operate a Comprehensive Micromobility Program that best meets the needs of the
City. The Federal Highway Administration defines micromobility as, "any small, low-
speed, human or electric-powered transportation device, including bicycles, scooters,
electric assist bicycles (e-bikes), electric scooters (e-scooters), and other small,
lightweight, wheeled conveyances."
Phoenix has been operating the E-Scooter Pilot Program since September 2019.
Building on the success of the Pilot Program, the Request for Proposals (RFP) will add
traditional bicycles, e-bikes, adaptive vehicles and increase fleet caps. The new
program will include requirements to address equity and will institute new parking
requirements. Additionally, the operational boundaries will be expanded beyond the
current downtown Pilot Program boundaries. The initial phase will cover the area
shown in Attachment A.
Request for Proposals Evaluation Criteria
To ensure the vendors' goals and values are aligned with the City’s, a set of evaluation
criteria has been assembled for the RFP evaluation panel to use in selecting vendors
based on the following criteria:
· Scope of Work;
· Company's Experience and Project Team;
· Operational Requirements;
· Technical Requirements;
· Equity;
· Education and Community Outreach; and
· Data.
Page 187
Financial Impact
The Micromobility Program will be cost neutral to the City based on the established fee
structure to recover costs for administration of the program.
Public Outreach
Staff conducted extensive outreach in November 2021 to gather feedback from the
community on the proposed program. Street Transportation staff collected 209
responses through the online survey and recorded over 830 dot poll interactions from
community members at four in-person outreach events. The public strongly supports a
boundary expansion with the implementation of new parking requirements.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on April 20, 2022, by a vote of 4-0.
Location
Council Districts: 4, 7 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 188
Attachment A
Page 189
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
ST87600131 (Ordinance S-48574)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Hunter Contracting Co. to provide Construction Manager at Risk Construction
Services for the Grand Canal Phase III project. Further request to authorize execution
of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $6,910,700.
Summary
The purpose of this project is to install a pathway for pedestrians and bicycle use and
incorporate public art, landscaping and neighborhood access points along the Grand
Canal between 75th and 47th avenues.
Hunter Contracting Co.'s initial services will include preparation of a Guaranteed
Maximum Price proposal for the Construction Services provided under the agreement
and participating with the City in a process to establish a Small Business Enterprise
(SBE) goal for the project. Hunter Contracting Co. will be responsible for construction
means and methods related to the project and fulfilling the SBE program requirements.
Hunter Contracting Co. will be required to solicit bids from prequalified subcontractors
and to perform the work using the City’s subcontractor selection process. Hunter
Contracting Co. may also compete to self-perform limited amounts of work.
Hunter Contracting Co.'s services include, but are not limited to, attending project
meetings; developing and analyzing project schedules; creating construction
management plans; performing plan and constructability reviews; cost estimating;
construction of the pathway with lights; High Intensity Activated CrossWalKs (HAWKs);
and installation of art and landscaping.
Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Scoring and selection were made in
conjunction with the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Preconstruction Services
selection process.
Page 190
Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 365 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for Hunter Contracting Co. will not exceed $6,910,700, including
all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Engineering Services Agreement 153853 (Ordinance S-47337) on March 3, 2021;
and
· CMAR Preconstruction Services Agreement 154118 (Ordinance S-47468) on April
21, 2021.
Public Outreach
Hunter Contracting Co. will work with the City of Phoenix public outreach firm on public
engagement.
Location
Grand Canal between 75th and 47th avenues
Council Districts: 4 and 5
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 191
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Award - IFB 63-2204 (Ordinance S-48613)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
contracts with: Brewer Cote of Arizona, Inc.; and Musgrove Enterprises, LLC dba
Sealmaster Arizona to provide parts and supplies for the Street Transportation
Department’s Seal Coat Program. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed
$63,000.
Summary
These contracts will provide the Street Transportation Department Street Maintenance
Division the supplies necessary for the maintenance and repair of machine parts on
the tank sprayers and tank applicators which are utilized to apply seal coating material
on the City’s roadways and paved surfaces to protect them from damage. Supplies are
also needed for staff to operate the machinery and hand equipment for this program.
Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10.
Two vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive and responsible to provide the
required goods and services. Following an evaluation based on price, the procurement
officer recommends award to the following vendors:
Selected Bidders
Brewer Cote of Arizona, Inc.
Musgrove Enterprises, LLC dba Sealmaster Arizona
Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about June 1, 2022, for a five-year term.
Financial Impact
The contracts' aggregate value will not exceed $63,000.
Page 192
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 193
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Resolution 22014)
Request to adopt a resolution to support formation of the Hacienda del Campo
Irrigation Water Delivery District through Maricopa County. The proposed Irrigation
Water Delivery District includes the single-family residential properties bounded by
Osborn Road to the south, Clarendon Avenue to the north, 44th Street to the west, and
48th Street to the east. This action has no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.
Summary
Under the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) Chapter 20, Title 48,
Irrigation Water Delivery Districts, when the majority of the lot or parcel owners entitled
to or capable of receiving irrigation water from the same system want irrigation water
delivered to their lands, they may propose the organization of an Irrigation Water
Delivery District (IWDD). Maricopa County requires that applicants for an IWDD within
process of forming or re-establishing a district.
If approved by the City Council, landowning neighbors seeking an IWDD complete a
special taxation impact statement and submit this document to the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors, along with Salt River Project (SRP),
will decide if a petition to organize an IWDD may be circulated. See Attachment A for
the Consent from SRP to the Board of Supervisors and map of the SRP delivery
system.
This request has been reviewed by the Street Transportation and Water Services
departments.
Financial Impact
This action has no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.
Public Outreach
On Feb. 15, 2022, the City received a formal written request from City of Phoenix
resident Delbert Dees, representative for the Hacienda del Campo neighborhood, to
pursue City Council approval to form an IWDD with Maricopa County (Attachment B).
Page 194
Location
The proposed IWDD includes the single-family residential properties bounded by
Osborn Road to the south, Clarendon Avenue to the north, 44th Street to the west, and
48th Street to the east.
Council District: 6
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Street Transportation and Water Services departments.
Page 195
Attachment A – Consent from SRP to Board of Supervisors and Map of SRP
Delivery System
Page 196
Page 197
Attachment B - Request Letter and Map Submitted by Hacienda del Campo
To: City of Phoenix
CC: Salt River Project
February 15, 2022
From: Delbert Dees
RE: Request for Formation of Irrigation Water Delivery District
Dear City of Phoenix,
We as a neighborhood Hacienda Del Campo, are requesting consent to form an Irrigation
Water Delivery District (IWDD) from the City of Phoenix. The purpose of an IWDD is to
create an equitable distribution of costs associated with the use and maintenance of the
private neighborhood irrigation system. This is accomplished using an annual Maricopa
County property assessment. We are asking the City of Phoenix to pass this request of
resolution, authorizing the formation of Hacienda Del Campo IWDD .
Enclosed you will find Salt River Project’s approval along with maps of the proposed district,
legal description, and the homeowner list. I will be the representative for the proposed
IWDD. Once we receive approval from the City of Phoenix, an Impact Statement to form will
be sent to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to move the process forward. We
appreciate your attention to this request. For questions please contact me at the number
below.
Sincerely,
Delbert “Rusty” Dees
4742 E Clarendon Ave
Phoenix, AZ 85018
Rustydees26@gmail.com
602-980-7734
Page 198
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
HACIENDA DEL CAMPO
That Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 2 North, Range 4 East, of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;
EXCEPT therefrom Tracts A and B and Lots 592, 593, 594, and 622 of RANCHO VENTURA TRACT NO. 22, a
Subdivision of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 2 North, Range
4 East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian according to the Plat of Record in the Office of the
County Recorder of Maricopa County, Arizona, Recorded in Book 60 of Maps, Page 37;
AND
EXCEPT the South 183 Feet of the East 152 Feet of the West half of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 30;
AND
EXCEPT the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 30;
TOGETHER WITH
That portion of abandoned alley as set forth in Resolution No. 21821, as recorded in Maricopa County
recording document No. 2020‐0432850;
TOGETHER WITH
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 2 North, Range 4
East, of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona; described as follows:
From the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 30; thence East along the North line
thereof 1942.50 feet;
Thence South 01 Degree 50 Minutes 30 Seconds East along the East line of the West 1942.5 feet of the
Northeast Quarter of said Section 30, a distance of 1303.75 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
Thence South 01 Degree 50 Minutes 30 Seconds East along the East line of the West 1942.50 feet of the
Northeast Quarter of said Section 30, a distance of 16.81 feet to the South line of the North half of the
Northeast Quarter of said Section 30;
Page 199
Thence North 89 Degrees 52 Minutes 00 Seconds East along said South line, 743.98 feet, more or less, to
the Southeast corner of the North half of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 30;
Thence North 01 Degree 55 Minutes 00 Seconds West along the East line of the Northeast Quarter of
said Section 30 to the Southeast corner of the certain tract of land conveyed to Phoenix Newspapers,
Inc., by deed recorded in Docket 1030, Page 12, records of Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence West along the South line of the aforesaid tract, 743.98 feet, more or less, to the True Point of
Beginning; as recorded in Docket 14180 pages 585‐587;
TOGETHER WITH
That Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 2 North, Range 4 East, of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;
EXCEPT the West half of the West half of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30;
AND
EXCEPT the West 112 Feet of the North 122.79 Feet of the East half of the West half of said Southeast
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30 as measured along the West line of said East half of the
West half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter;
Page 200
Page 201
HaciendaPropertyOwnerReport 1of3
4/28/2021
Total Total Net
Total Exempt Total Assessed Exempt Assessed
Mailing Exempt Exempt Improvement Assessed Assessed Net Value Assessed Value Total
Count ParcelNo TaxYear OwnerName InCareOf MailingAddress Suite CityStateZip SitusAddress SitusCityZip Status Type LandFCV FCV TotalFCV FCV FCV FCV TotalLPV (LPV) Value (LPV) Acreage
1 127Ͳ08Ͳ064 2021 25/45LLC 3619N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85040 3619N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $75,100 $300,600 $375,700 $37,570 $0 $37,570 $227,684 $22,768 $0 $22,768 0.231
2 127Ͳ08Ͳ033 2021 ALVAREZRICHARDA 3435N45THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3435N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $155,300 $621,300 $776,600 $77,660 $0 $77,660 $507,372 $50,737 $0 $50,737 0.338
3 127Ͳ02Ͳ060 2021 ANDRESENNIKHILA/SCOGGINEMILY 3417N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3417N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $116,700 $467,000 $583,700 $58,370 $0 $58,370 $427,099 $42,710 $0 $42,710 0.270
4 127Ͳ08Ͳ026 2021 ANDREWSUCATOLLC 4111EWINSLOWAVE PHOENIXAZ85040 3414N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $88,200 $352,900 $441,100 $44,110 $0 $44,110 $275,200 $27,520 $0 $27,520 0.202
5 127Ͳ02Ͳ033 2021 ARCHBOLDCAROLM 4721ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4721ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $89,600 $358,700 $448,300 $44,830 $0 $44,830 $281,393 $28,139 $0 $28,139 0.294
6 127Ͳ02Ͳ048 2021 AZCR47WAYINVESTORSLLC 7420N62NDST PARADISEVALLEYAZ85253 3434N47THWY, PHOENIX85018 $98,700 $394,800 $493,500 $49,350 $0 $49,350 $319,623 $31,962 $0 $31,962 0.319
7 127Ͳ02Ͳ010 2021 BAILEYJAMESLEE 3625N47THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3625N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $107,300 $429,300 $536,600 $53,660 $0 $53,660 $378,487 $37,849 $0 $37,849 0.288
8 127Ͳ08Ͳ025 2021 BERNSTEINDAVIDB 3408N45THST PHOENIXAZ850180000 3408N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $74,700 $298,900 $373,600 $37,360 $0 $37,360 $225,360 $22,536 $0 $22,536 0.201
9 127Ͳ02Ͳ023A 2021 BORROMEOEDUARDOC 3452N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3452N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $108,500 $434,300 $542,800 $54,280 $0 $54,280 $365,206 $36,521 $0 $36,521 0.219
10 127Ͳ08Ͳ032 2021 BRANNANBETHANY/MATTHEW 4458EMITCHELLDR PHOENIXAZ85018 4458EMITCHELLDR, PHOENIX85018 $84,400 $337,700 $422,100 $42,210 $0 $42,210 $254,151 $25,415 $0 $25,415 0.286
11 127Ͳ08Ͳ057 2021 BRBFAMILYTRUST BURKEWILLIAMH/ROBINLTR 4514ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4514ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $173,700 $694,800 $868,500 $86,850 $0 $86,850 $581,697 $58,170 $0 $58,170 0.245
BROOKEMONAHANREVOCABLELIVING
12 127Ͳ08Ͳ035 2021 TRUST 3423N45THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3423N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $127,200 $509,100 $636,300 $63,630 $0 $63,630 $429,563 $42,956 $0 $42,956 0.230
13 127Ͳ08Ͳ036 2021 BRUNSBENJAMINS/CRISTINAS 3419N45THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3419N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $120,600 $482,700 $603,300 $60,330 $0 $60,330 $421,520 $42,152 $0 $42,152 0.243
14 127Ͳ02Ͳ006 2021 BRYANSFAMILYTRUST BRYANSANDREWETR 3441N47THPLACE PHOENIXAZ85018 3441N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $176,300 $705,400 $881,700 $88,170 $0 $88,170 $628,058 $62,806 $0 $62,806 0.341
15 127Ͳ02Ͳ012A 2021 CAGLEDANIELFIII/KELLYW 4734ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4734ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $154,800 $619,400 $774,200 $77,420 $0 $77,420 $565,909 $56,591 $0 $56,591 0.498
16 127Ͳ08Ͳ074 2021 CARDENASRICHARD/VIRGINIAA 3410N45THPL PHOENIXAZ850180000 3410N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $143,500 $574,100 $717,600 $71,760 $0 $71,760 $495,144 $49,514 $0 $49,514 0.259
17 127Ͳ08Ͳ079 2021 CARROLLJOHNH/SANDRAK 3440N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3440N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $111,800 $447,300 $559,100 $55,910 $0 $55,910 $392,730 $39,273 $0 $39,273 0.276
18 127Ͳ02Ͳ020A 2021 CENTURIONTRUST KATZWENDETR 3614N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3614N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $149,700 $598,800 $748,500 $74,850 $0 $74,850 $541,484 $54,148 $0 $54,148 0.231
19 127Ͳ08Ͳ080 2021 CHAPINWILLIAMA/PATRICIAF 4525EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4525EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $73,700 $294,900 $368,600 $36,860 $0 $36,860 $230,932 $23,093 $0 $23,093 0.246
20 127Ͳ02Ͳ032 2021 CHAPMANLIVINGTRUST CHAPMANTOM/DTR 4711ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4711ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $89,900 $359,600 $449,500 $44,950 $0 $44,950 $283,715 $28,372 $0 $28,372 0.312
CHRISTENSENMEREDITHRHODA/MITCHELL
21 127Ͳ08Ͳ098 2021 JAMES 4443ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4443ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $95,600 $382,700 $478,300 $47,830 $0 $47,830 $314,671 $31,467 $0 $31,467 0.240
CHRISTOPHERJMICHLANDASHLEYM
22 127Ͳ08Ͳ058 2021 MICHLTRUST 4520ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4520ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $108,600 $434,700 $543,300 $54,330 $0 $54,330 $404,850 $40,485 $0 $40,485 0.241
23 127Ͳ08Ͳ084 2021 COELHOFILIPE 4501EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4501EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $127,000 $508,200 $635,200 $63,520 $0 $63,520 $436,730 $43,673 $0 $43,673 0.246
24 127Ͳ02Ͳ044 2021 COFFINRYANMATTHEW/RACHELMEZICH 3455N47THWAY PHOENIXAZ85018 3455N47THWY, PHOENIX85018 $675,900 $0 $675,900 $101,385 $0 $101,385 $385,263 $57,789 $0 $57,789 0.528
25 127Ͳ02Ͳ061 2021 CRANEFAMILYREVOCABLETRUST CRANECARTERM/DENISEMTR 3427N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3427N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $134,600 $538,700 $673,300 $67,330 $0 $67,330 $470,691 $47,069 $0 $47,069 0.357
26 127Ͳ08Ͳ095 2021 DEERINGWDARWIN/BARBARAA 4425ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4425ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $103,500 $414,300 $517,800 $51,780 $0 $51,780 $321,171 $32,117 $0 $32,117 0.242
DELBERTLDEESANDMARYHDEES1998
27 127Ͳ02Ͳ011A 2021 TRUST 2857CAMBRIDGEDR SANJOSECA95125 4742ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $154,300 $617,400 $771,700 $77,170 $0 $77,170 $536,194 $53,619 $0 $53,619 0.555
28 127Ͳ08Ͳ062 2021 DODDNICHOLAS/MARGARET 3631N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3631N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $145,100 $580,500 $725,600 $72,560 $0 $72,560 $473,855 $47,386 $0 $47,386 0.229
29 127Ͳ02Ͳ047 2021 DONALDANDKATHYWATTSFAMILYTRUST 8374WPALOVERDEAVE PEORIAAZ85345 3442N47THWY, PHOENIX85018 $95,200 $381,100 $476,300 $47,630 $0 $47,630 $306,003 $30,600 $0 $30,600 0.311
EDGARMICHAELSCOTT/LINDALEE
30 127Ͳ08Ͳ065 2021 EDGARLIVINGTRUST TR 3613N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3613N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $99,100 $396,700 $495,800 $49,580 $0 $49,580 $310,337 $31,034 $0 $31,034 0.234
31 127Ͳ08Ͳ066 2021 EDWARDSALLISONJ 3607N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3607N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $115,200 $461,100 $576,300 $57,630 $0 $57,630 $412,469 $41,247 $0 $41,247 0.230
32 127Ͳ02Ͳ004 2021 EDWARDSDAVIDA/DEBORAHJ 3427N47THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3427N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $119,000 $476,300 $595,300 $59,530 $0 $59,530 $478,274 $47,827 $0 $47,827 0.654
33 127Ͳ08Ͳ087 2021 EGGERSARNOLDW/PATRICIAATR 4437EWELDON PHOENIXAZ85018 4437EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $84,900 $339,900 $424,800 $42,480 $0 $42,480 $272,414 $27,241 $0 $27,241 0.247
34 127Ͳ02Ͳ063 2021 FALKROBERTEJR 3420N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3420N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $96,700 $386,800 $483,500 $48,350 $0 $48,350 $339,900 $33,990 $0 $33,990 0.239
35 127Ͳ02Ͳ001 2021 FALKROBERTE/JOANATR 4750EOSBORNRD PHOENIXAZ850180000 4750EOSBORNRD, PHOENIX85018 $152,300 $609,300 $761,600 $76,160 $0 $76,160 $690,806 $69,081 $0 $69,081 0.722
36 127Ͳ08Ͳ055 2021 FIELDFAMILYTRUST FIELDROBERTNSR/SUSANDTR 4502ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4502ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $84,900 $339,600 $424,500 $42,450 $0 $42,450 $267,926 $26,793 $0 $26,793 0.243
37 127Ͳ08Ͳ061 2021 FOURNIERMICHEL/STHILAIRENATHALIE 3639N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3639N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $84,300 $337,400 $421,700 $42,170 $0 $42,170 $312,674 $31,267 $0 $31,267 0.235
38 127Ͳ08Ͳ037 2021 GEORGEANDMARYHALLLIVINGTRUST 1024DAYBREAKDR OGDENUT84403 3413N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $149,400 $597,800 $747,200 $74,720 $0 $74,720 $487,820 $48,782 $0 $48,782 0.240
GERALDANDJOANCOLANGELOFAMILY
39 127Ͳ02Ͳ009 2021 TRUST 70ECOUNTRYCLUBDR PHOENIXAZ85014 3617N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $161,600 $646,600 $808,200 $80,820 $0 $80,820 $557,658 $55,766 $0 $55,766 0.329
40 127Ͳ08Ͳ092 2021 GLANZERCHRISTOPHERA 3618N44THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3618N44THPL, PHOENIX85018 $146,400 $585,600 $732,000 $73,200 $0 $73,200 $494,267 $49,427 $0 $49,427 0.255
41 127Ͳ08Ͳ105 2021 GLASCOBRIANJ/JOYM 4526EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4526EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $99,100 $396,700 $495,800 $49,580 $0 $49,580 $321,634 $32,163 $0 $32,163 0.237
42 127Ͳ02Ͳ041 2021 GOSEWISCHJAMESB/KYLEYN 3433N47THWAY PHOENIXAZ85018 3433N47THWY, PHOENIX85018 $119,600 $478,500 $598,100 $59,810 $0 $59,810 $385,870 $38,587 $0 $38,587 0.326
43 127Ͳ08Ͳ100 2021 HALLLINDSEY/CORTESKENNETH 4501ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4501ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $144,100 $576,400 $720,500 $72,050 $0 $72,050 $484,432 $48,443 $0 $48,443 0.243
44 127Ͳ08Ͳ103 2021 HARMANJOHNNIV/DENISET 4519ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4519ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $106,700 $427,100 $533,800 $53,380 $0 $53,380 $383,832 $38,383 $0 $38,383 0.240
45 127Ͳ02Ͳ043 2021 HARMONDOUGLASCOLLIN/PHOEBE 3449N47THWAY PHOENIXAZ85018 3449N47THWY, PHOENIX85018 $121,900 $487,800 $609,700 $60,970 $0 $60,970 $456,141 $45,614 $0 $45,614 0.340
46 127Ͳ02Ͳ026 2021 HEAZELTINEFAMILYLIVINGTRUST HEAZELTINEHAROLDF/REBATR 3437N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3437N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $86,400 $345,700 $432,100 $43,210 $0 $43,210 $293,001 $29,300 $0 $29,300 0.212
47 127Ͳ02Ͳ034 2021 HECKENLAIBLEFAMILYLIVINGTRUST HECKENLAIBLEJOHNJ/AIMEECTR 4727ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4727ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $100,900 $403,900 $504,800 $50,480 $0 $50,480 $357,699 $35,770 $0 $35,770 0.302
48 127Ͳ08Ͳ067 2021 HERITAGECAITLINM/FARRAJOSHUAW 3601N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3601N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $78,400 $313,800 $392,200 $39,220 $0 $39,220 $245,483 $24,548 $0 $24,548 0.237
49 127Ͳ08Ͳ097 2021 HERNANDEZJOSEM/SUZANEM 701S120THAVE AVONDALEAZ85323 4437ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $90,600 $362,600 $453,200 $45,320 $0 $45,320 $302,661 $30,266 $0 $30,266 0.245
50 127Ͳ08Ͳ051 2021 HOPKINSFAMILYTRUST JANICEHOPKINSTRUSTEE 4432ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4432ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $102,900 $411,700 $514,600 $51,460 $0 $51,460 $360,553 $36,055 $0 $36,055 0.245
51 127Ͳ08Ͳ106 2021 HUNSAKERREVOCABLETRUST 4624EEXETERBLVD PHOENIXAZ85018 4520EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $101,900 $407,600 $509,500 $50,950 $0 $50,950 $340,208 $34,021 $0 $34,021 0.242
52 127Ͳ08Ͳ110 2021 JACKSONJEFFS/JEFFREYS 4450EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4450EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $92,200 $368,800 $461,000 $46,100 $0 $46,100 $282,941 $28,294 $0 $28,294 0.245
53 127Ͳ08Ͳ113 2021 JAT2020REALESTATEIRREVOCABLETRUST THOMASJILLATR 4432EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4432EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $84,600 $338,400 $423,000 $42,300 $0 $42,300 $266,688 $26,669 $0 $26,669 0.246
Page 202
HaciendaPropertyOwnerReport 2of3
4/28/2021
54 127Ͳ08Ͳ024A 2021 JEONGINCHEOL/KIMINBANG 3402N45THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3402N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $87,400 $349,900 $437,300 $43,730 $0 $43,730 $316,838 $31,684 $0 $31,684 0.299
JIMENEZDANIELCHAN/CARLY
55 127Ͳ02Ͳ039 2021 JIMENEZFAMILYTRUST MARIETR 3442N47THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3442N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $183,300 $733,400 $916,700 $91,670 $0 $91,670 $661,328 $66,133 $0 $66,133 0.300
56 127Ͳ02Ͳ040 2021 JOHNMANDMAYIBRUNERLIVINGTRUST BRUNERJOHNM/MAYITRUSTEES 3434N47THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3434N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $83,800 $335,400 $419,200 $41,920 $0 $41,920 $281,081 $28,108 $0 $28,108 0.303
57 127Ͳ02Ͳ049 2021 JOHNSONDOUGLASA/ELENAK 3430N47THWAY PHOENIXAZ85018 3430N47THWY, PHOENIX85018 $191,600 $766,600 $958,200 $95,820 $0 $95,820 $674,955 $67,496 $0 $67,496 0.578
58 127Ͳ08Ͳ078 2021 JOHNSONSHERRYEM 4340EINDIANSCHOOLRD STE21Ͳ222 PHOENIXAZ85018 3434N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $83,000 $332,300 $415,300 $41,530 $0 $41,530 $257,711 $25,771 $0 $25,771 0.260
59 127Ͳ08Ͳ107 2021 JOLYRANDALLL/SANDRAJ 4514EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ850180000 4514EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $97,500 $390,200 $487,700 $48,770 $0 $48,770 $339,952 $33,995 $0 $33,995 0.244
60 127Ͳ02Ͳ014A 2021 JOONCHARLESTRUST KELLERDUKE/RASHINTR 4720ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4720ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $134,400 $537,600 $672,000 $67,200 $0 $67,200 $504,201 $50,420 $0 $50,420 0.471
61 127Ͳ02Ͳ030 2021 JUETTENPHILIP/MARY 3611N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3611N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $105,900 $423,700 $529,600 $52,960 $0 $52,960 $351,507 $35,151 $0 $35,151 0.199
62 127Ͳ08Ͳ082 2021 KELLEYJEFFREYA/BOBBYCOURTNEY 4513EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4513EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $85,700 $342,800 $428,500 $42,850 $0 $42,850 $287,297 $28,730 $0 $28,730 0.250
TOMMKENNEDY/JOANKENNEDY
63 127Ͳ02Ͳ022A 2021 KENNEDYFAMILYLIVINGTRUST TRUSTEES 3602N47THST PHOENIXAZ85028 3602N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $92,300 $369,400 $461,700 $46,170 $0 $46,170 $334,018 $33,402 $0 $33,402 0.231
64 127Ͳ02Ͳ025A 2021 KENNEDYFRANCESC 3438N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3438N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $83,400 $333,800 $417,200 $41,720 $0 $41,720 $272,570 $27,257 $0 $27,257 0.222
KERRJEFFREYERNEST/VIRGINIA
65 127Ͳ02Ͳ005 2021 KERR1995FAMILYTRUST EILEENTR 3433N47THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3433N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $115,800 $463,400 $579,200 $57,920 $0 $57,920 $446,698 $44,670 $0 $44,670 0.392
KYLEMANDWENDYSFISCHER
66 127Ͳ02Ͳ016A 2021 KYLEANDWENDYFISCHERLIVINGTRUST TTE 4702ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4702ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $172,200 $689,100 $861,300 $86,130 $0 $86,130 $662,283 $66,228 $0 $66,228 0.377
67 127Ͳ08Ͳ059 2021 LANEJONATHANS/GARDNERCARRIJ 4526ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4526ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $153,500 $614,100 $767,600 $76,760 $0 $76,760 $512,680 $51,268 $0 $51,268 0.236
68 127Ͳ08Ͳ102 2021 LDPROPERTYNO1LLC 425WGEMINIDR TEMPEAZ85283 4513ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $90,300 $361,500 $451,800 $45,180 $0 $45,180 $240,331 $24,033 $0 $24,033 0.242
69 127Ͳ02Ͳ029 2021 LEEMICHAELC/GAILW 3601N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3601N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $98,700 $395,100 $493,800 $49,380 $0 $49,380 $328,136 $32,814 $0 $32,814 0.225
70 127Ͳ08Ͳ071 2021 LEHMMILVAVTR 3421N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3421N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $105,700 $423,000 $528,700 $52,870 $0 $52,870 $365,818 $36,582 $0 $36,582 0.235
71 127Ͳ02Ͳ027 2021 LEWISRANDALLA/LISAA 8724EPARAISODR SCOTTSDALEAZ85255 3445N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $80,500 $322,200 $402,700 $40,270 $0 $40,270 $289,145 $28,915 $0 $28,915 0.194
72 127Ͳ02Ͳ065 2021 LONGELIZABETHBURNETTE 4624EOSBORN PHOENIXAZ85018 4624EOSBORNRD, PHOENIX85018 $90,900 $363,700 $454,600 $45,460 $0 $45,460 $363,117 $36,312 $0 $36,312 0.255
73 127Ͳ08Ͳ049 2021 LONGHORNCONTRACTINGLLC 1414EAPPALOOSACT GILBERTAZ85296 4420ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $76,500 $306,300 $382,800 $38,280 $0 $38,280 $232,327 $23,233 $0 $23,233 0.246
74 127Ͳ08Ͳ027 2021 LOYCHRISTOPHERPATRICK 3420N45THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3420N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $89,900 $359,700 $449,600 $44,960 $0 $44,960 $299,769 $29,977 $0 $29,977 0.207
75 127Ͳ08Ͳ077 2021 LOZANOSEVERO/FIGUEROAROSATR 3428N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3428N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $82,100 $328,400 $410,500 $41,050 $0 $41,050 $249,974 $24,997 $0 $24,997 0.256
76 127Ͳ02Ͳ050 2021 MANSFIELDͲNOVOAMICHELLE 3420N47THWY PHOENIXAZ85018 3420N47THWY, PHOENIX85018 $113,400 $453,900 $567,300 $56,730 $0 $56,730 $420,599 $42,060 $0 $42,060 0.382
MARKEANDSANDRALNAGEOTTE
77 127Ͳ02Ͳ035 2021 REVOCABLETRUST 4735ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4735ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $115,900 $463,900 $579,800 $57,980 $0 $57,980 $440,042 $44,004 $0 $44,004 0.415
78 127Ͳ02Ͳ007A 2021 MARKREUBEN&ARLENEJ 74HARBORDR. GREENWICHCT06830 3601N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $88,100 $364,300 $452,400 $45,240 $0 $45,240 $315,134 $31,513 $0 $31,513 0.329
78 127Ͳ02Ͳ056B 2021 MARKREUBEN&ARLENEJ 74HARBORDR. GREENWICHCT06830 $2,900 $0 $2,900 $290 $0 $290 $1,688 $169 $0 $169 0.011
79 127Ͳ08Ͳ030B 2021 MARTINCOLLEENE/BRADLEYT 4448EMITCHELLDR PHOENIXAZ85018 $83,773 $300,300 $384,073 $38,407 $0 $38,407 $227,038 $22,704 $0 $22,704 0.230
80 127Ͳ08Ͳ101 2021 MARYEMADAYLIVINGTRUST 4507ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4507ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $81,600 $326,700 $408,300 $40,830 $0 $40,830 $245,328 $24,533 $0 $24,533 0.240
81 127Ͳ02Ͳ003 2021 MATHESONSHAWN/NANCYE 3421N47THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3421N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $157,100 $628,500 $785,600 $78,560 $0 $78,560 $588,728 $58,873 $0 $58,873 0.356
82 127Ͳ02Ͳ028 2021 MCBRIDESTEPHENJ/LAUREND 3451N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3451N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $91,400 $365,800 $457,200 $45,720 $0 $45,720 $332,316 $33,232 $0 $33,232 0.229
83 127Ͳ08Ͳ108 2021 MCFARLINJOHW 4508EWELDON PHOENIXAZ85018 4508EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $76,200 $305,100 $381,300 $38,130 $0 $38,130 $231,551 $23,155 $0 $23,155 0.243
84 127Ͳ08Ͳ111 2021 MILLSOPSHERRILLKTR 4444EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4444EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $82,600 $330,700 $413,300 $41,330 $0 $41,330 $246,568 $24,657 $0 $24,657 0.240
MONTERODAVIDACOSTA/FLORESLUIS
85 127Ͳ02Ͳ052 2021 EDUARDOAGUILAR 4712EOSBORNRD PHOENIXAZ85018 4712EOSBORNRD, PHOENIX85018 $132,800 $531,300 $664,100 $66,410 $0 $66,410 $485,702 $48,570 $0 $48,570 0.621
86 127Ͳ02Ͳ045 2021 MURPHYPAMELAS/BRIANJTR 3461N47THWY PHOENIXAZ85018 3461N47THWY, PHOENIX85018 $155,900 $623,700 $779,600 $77,960 $0 $77,960 $557,089 $55,709 $0 $55,709 0.373
87 127Ͳ08Ͳ083 2021 NANSONLIVINGTRUST NANSONBENJAMINT/LAURATR 4507EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4507EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $161,100 $644,700 $805,800 $80,580 $0 $80,580 $472,862 $47,286 $0 $47,286 0.249
NATHANJOHNSNELLANDEMILYKATHLEEN
88 127Ͳ08Ͳ085 2021 SNELLTRUST 4449EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4449EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $120,200 $480,800 $601,000 $60,100 $0 $60,100 $408,490 $40,849 $0 $40,849 0.242
89 127Ͳ02Ͳ058 2021 NELSONNATHANTODD/DELTHAJTR 4702EOSBORNRD PHOENIXAZ85018 4702EOSBORNRD, PHOENIX85018 $98,700 $395,000 $493,700 $49,370 $0 $49,370 $423,648 $42,365 $0 $42,365 0.240
90 127Ͳ08Ͳ048 2021 NICHOLSWARREN/JENNY 4414ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4414ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $142,100 $568,500 $710,600 $71,060 $0 $71,060 $450,273 $45,027 $0 $45,027 0.276
91 127Ͳ02Ͳ019A 2021 ONEILLPATRICK/JULIEANNE 3622N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3622N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $95,700 $382,800 $478,500 $47,850 $0 $47,850 $298,728 $29,873 $0 $29,873 0.219
PATRICIAHKNACKSTEDTFAM
92 127Ͳ08Ͳ028 2021 TR/KNACKSTEDTJOY 3424N45THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3424N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $75,100 $300,400 $375,500 $37,550 $0 $37,550 $227,065 $22,707 $0 $22,707 0.213
93 127Ͳ02Ͳ021A 2021 PETHTELRANDYD/JESSICAENRIQUEZ 3608N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3608N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $94,900 $379,800 $474,700 $47,470 $0 $47,470 $297,337 $29,734 $0 $29,734 0.219
94 127Ͳ08Ͳ109 2021 PHILLIPSCAROLJ 4502EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ850186039 4502EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $93,800 $375,400 $469,200 $46,920 $0 $46,920 $321,200 $32,120 $0 $32,120 0.242
PROPERTYMANAGEMENT
E 127Ͳ02Ͳ007B 2021 PHOENIXCITYOF ADMINISTRATOR 251WWASHINGTONST8THFL PHOENIXAZ85003 E 6 $14,200 $0 $14,200 $2,130 $2,130 $0 $5,349 $802 $802 $0 0.007
PROPERTYMANAGEMENT
E 127Ͳ02Ͳ007C 2021 PHOENIXCITYOF ADMINISTRATOR 251WWASHINGTONST8THFL PHOENIXAZ85003 E 6 $2,900 $0 $2,900 $435 $435 $0 $1,094 $164 $164 $0 0.001
95 127Ͳ08Ͳ056 2021 RANDALLLYNNE 4508ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4508ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $97,600 $390,700 $488,300 $48,830 $0 $48,830 $293,465 $29,347 $0 $29,347 0.242
96 127Ͳ02Ͳ036 2021 REEDANNEMARIE 3618N47THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3618N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $151,000 $604,100 $755,100 $75,510 $0 $75,510 $574,422 $57,442 $0 $57,442 0.318
97 127Ͳ08Ͳ050 2021 REYNOLDSLAURENM/CASEYJ 4426ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4426ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $83,700 $334,900 $418,600 $41,860 $0 $41,860 $258,796 $25,880 $0 $25,880 0.242
98 127Ͳ08Ͳ031 2021 RIMBEYNORMANJR/DONNA 4452EMITCHELLDR PHOENIXAZ85018 4452EMITCHELLDR, PHOENIX85018 $107,300 $429,400 $536,700 $53,670 $0 $53,670 $354,650 $35,465 $0 $35,465 0.187
99 127Ͳ08Ͳ046 2021 RINKALAN/ARCHULETAMARYANN 4401ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4401ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $74,500 $298,100 $372,600 $37,260 $0 $37,260 $219,790 $21,979 $0 $21,979 0.249
100 127Ͳ08Ͳ112 2021 RJTRUST HARTROBERT/THOMASJILLATR 4438EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ850186038 4438EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $134,400 $537,900 $672,300 $67,230 $0 $67,230 $498,912 $49,891 $0 $49,891 0.244
101 127Ͳ08Ͳ047 2021 ROBERTALLENEIDSONLIVINGTRUST 511EMITCHELLDR PHOENIXAZ85012 4402ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $72,800 $291,300 $364,100 $36,410 $0 $36,410 $202,300 $20,230 $0 $20,230 0.363
ROBERTSONMICHAELE/JOYCEM
102 127Ͳ08Ͳ076 2021 ROBERTSONFAMILYTRUST TR 3422N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3422N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $102,500 $410,100 $512,600 $51,260 $0 $51,260 $340,055 $34,006 $0 $34,006 0.261
103 127Ͳ02Ͳ024A 2021 ROCKWOODBONNIEJ 3446N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3446N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $93,700 $375,000 $468,700 $46,870 $0 $46,870 $316,682 $31,668 $0 $31,668 0.231
104 127Ͳ08Ͳ075 2021 ROSALESFRANKLIN/EMMA 3416N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3416N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $93,400 $373,700 $467,100 $46,710 $0 $46,710 $294,393 $29,439 $0 $29,439 0.254
Page 203
HaciendaPropertyOwnerReport 3of3
4/28/2021
105 127Ͳ02Ͳ042 2021 RUESGACANDIDA 3443N47THWAY PHOENIXAZ85018 3443N47THWY, PHOENIX85018 $114,800 $459,300 $574,100 $57,410 $0 $57,410 $413,730 $41,373 $0 $41,373 0.272
106 127Ͳ02Ͳ031 2021 RUSHJASONALLEN/RHONDA 4701ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4701ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $99,500 $398,000 $497,500 $49,750 $0 $49,750 $327,672 $32,767 $0 $32,767 0.310
E 127Ͳ02Ͳ053A 2021 SRPAI&PD POBOX1980 PHOENIXAZ85001 E 6 $4,300 $0 $4,300 $645 $645 $0 $3,282 $492 $492 $0 0.003
E 127Ͳ02Ͳ056A 2021 SRPAI&PD POBOX1980 PHOENIXAZ85001 E 6 $18,400 $0 $18,400 $2,760 $2,760 $0 $13,965 $2,095 $2,095 $0 0.015
107 127Ͳ08Ͳ034 2021 SABOJOHNL 3429N45THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3429N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $91,800 $367,200 $459,000 $45,900 $0 $45,900 $324,803 $32,480 $0 $32,480 0.226
108 127Ͳ02Ͳ008 2021 SAILLANTFAMILYTRUST SAILLANTCHARLESL/ANNARTR 3611N47THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3611N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $120,900 $483,600 $604,500 $60,450 $0 $60,450 $445,306 $44,531 $0 $44,531 0.335
E 127Ͳ02Ͳ046 2021 SALVATIONARMY 2707EVANBURENSTOFC PHOENIXAZ85008 3450N47THWY, PHOENIX85018 E 1 $93,000 $372,100 $465,100 $69,765 $69,765 $0 $326,898 $49,035 $49,035 $0 0.333
MCDONALDSUSANOTONDOͲ
109 127Ͳ02Ͳ038 2021 SAMLIVINGTRUST PATTERSONTR 4932EFLOWERST PHOENIXAZ85018 3602N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $92,600 $370,400 $463,000 $46,300 $0 $46,300 $297,337 $29,734 $0 $29,734 0.305
110 127Ͳ08Ͳ053 2021 SAMUELJUSTINC/ALLISONA 530BRIARRD BELLINGHAMWA98225 4444ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $111,300 $445,400 $556,700 $55,670 $0 $55,670 $330,767 $33,077 $0 $33,077 0.240
111 127Ͳ08Ͳ029 2021 SHANAANDBARRYWAGNERTRUST 3430N45THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3430N45THST, PHOENIX85018 $123,500 $494,000 $617,500 $61,750 $0 $61,750 $412,935 $41,294 $0 $41,294 0.222
112 127Ͳ08Ͳ089 2021 SHARONJJOHNSONETRUST JOHNSTONESHARONJTR 4425EWELDON PHOENIXAZ85018 4425EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $105,400 $421,700 $527,100 $52,710 $0 $52,710 $374,654 $37,465 $0 $37,465 0.242
SHARPCLINTON
113 127Ͳ08Ͳ114 2021 SHARPFAMILYTRUST RITCHELL/TIFFANYJANETCOͲTR 4426EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4426EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $179,800 $719,200 $899,000 $89,900 $0 $89,900 $592,410 $59,241 $0 $59,241 0.240
114 127Ͳ02Ͳ062A 2021 SHROCKDAVIDR/TWILAJO 3428N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3428N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $94,900 $379,900 $474,800 $47,480 $0 $47,480 $344,386 $34,439 $0 $34,439 0.290
115 127Ͳ08Ͳ099 2021 SIMONDSSANDRAL 4449ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4449ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $123,400 $493,800 $617,200 $61,720 $0 $61,720 $412,027 $41,203 $0 $41,203 0.244
116 127Ͳ08Ͳ081 2021 SLAVIKPAULA/SIMONEJACLYNNICOLE 4519EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4519EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $138,400 $553,900 $692,300 $69,230 $0 $69,230 $501,307 $50,131 $0 $50,131 0.249
SLOVENSKYMARKS/PATRICIAM
117 127Ͳ08Ͳ069 2021 SLOVENSKYLIVINGTRUST TR 3433N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3433N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $107,400 $429,900 $537,300 $53,730 $0 $53,730 $315,473 $31,547 $0 $31,547 0.230
118 127Ͳ08Ͳ070 2021 SMITHAARON 3427N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3427N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $81,400 $325,800 $407,200 $40,720 $0 $40,720 $244,556 $24,456 $0 $24,456 0.234
119 127Ͳ08Ͳ063 2021 SNELLINGHTRACYIII/CARPENTERAARONC 3625N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3625N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $125,700 $502,800 $628,500 $62,850 $0 $62,850 $392,786 $39,279 $0 $39,279 0.232
120 127Ͳ02Ͳ013A 2021 STANLEYMICHAEL/MURPHYCHERYL 4726ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4726ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $247,100 $988,600 $1,235,700 $123,570 $0 $123,570 $812,534 $81,253 $0 $81,253 0.498
121 127Ͳ02Ͳ037 2021 STARKWEATHERMARYJEANTR 3612N47THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3612N47THPL, PHOENIX85018 $83,300 $333,400 $416,700 $41,670 $0 $41,670 $280,463 $28,046 $0 $28,046 0.307
122 127Ͳ08Ͳ060 2021 STAUFFSHELBYKIRK/JACQUELYN 3643N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3643N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $88,800 $355,500 $444,300 $44,430 $0 $44,430 $307,898 $30,790 $0 $30,790 0.231
123 127Ͳ02Ͳ051 2021 STEPHENSDAVIDB/CAROLTR 4722EOSBORNRD PHOENIXAZ85018 4722EOSBORNRD, PHOENIX85018 $184,400 $737,600 $922,000 $92,200 $0 $92,200 $839,618 $83,962 $0 $83,962 0.700
124 127Ͳ08Ͳ096 2021 STEPHENSONLARRYRANDSHARONL 4431ECLARENDON PHOENIXAZ850180000 4431ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $83,300 $333,400 $416,700 $41,670 $0 $41,670 $256,163 $25,616 $0 $25,616 0.248
125 127Ͳ08Ͳ072 2021 STEWARTBRUCE 3415N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3415N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $143,400 $573,800 $717,200 $71,720 $0 $71,720 $480,471 $48,047 $0 $48,047 0.232
126 127Ͳ02Ͳ064 2021 STROUPEFAMILYTRUST STROUPEJRUDY/BARBARADTR 3412N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3412N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $108,600 $434,500 $543,100 $54,310 $0 $54,310 $411,719 $41,172 $0 $41,172 0.234
127 127Ͳ08Ͳ068 2021 SUCATOTRACY 3639N45THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3439N45THPL, PHOENIX85018 $127,400 $509,900 $637,300 $63,730 $0 $63,730 $431,407 $43,141 $0 $43,141 0.232
128 127Ͳ02Ͳ018A 2021 SWARTZCASSANDRA 3628N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3628N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $85,200 $340,900 $426,100 $42,610 $0 $42,610 $305,865 $30,587 $0 $30,587 0.231
129 127Ͳ02Ͳ054H 2021 SYMONDSJONIS 4752ECLARENDON PHOENIXAZ85018 4752ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $75,200 $301,100 $376,300 $37,630 $0 $37,630 $241,457 $24,146 $0 $24,146 0.332
TOTHSTEVENCJR/MARYJ
130 127Ͳ02Ͳ002 2021 TOTHFAMILYTRUST TRUSTEES 4738EOSBORNERD PHOENIXAZ85018 4738EOSBORNRD, PHOENIX85018 $154,600 $618,500 $773,100 $77,310 $0 $77,310 $644,354 $64,435 $0 $64,435 0.742
131 127Ͳ08Ͳ104 2021 TOTHMARKC/MYRAJ 4525ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ850186032 4525ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $93,500 $374,200 $467,700 $46,770 $0 $46,770 $293,465 $29,347 $0 $29,347 0.235
132 127Ͳ08Ͳ088 2021 TROTHKYLEJ 4431EWELDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4431EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $84,500 $338,300 $422,800 $42,280 $0 $42,280 $257,247 $25,725 $0 $25,725 0.241
133 127Ͳ08Ͳ090 2021 ULRIKSONSARAHS/KENNETHJJRTR 3602N44THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3602N44THPL, PHOENIX85018 $93,800 $375,500 $469,300 $46,930 $0 $46,930 $329,606 $32,961 $0 $32,961 0.286
VALCAMPSEANR/SHENTON
134 127Ͳ08Ͳ093 2021 VALCAMPFAMILYTRUST LESLIEO 3624N44THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3624N44THPL, PHOENIX85018 $126,500 $506,000 $632,500 $63,250 $0 $63,250 $431,592 $43,159 $0 $43,159 0.250
135 127Ͳ08Ͳ094 2021 VETTERMAUREENSUSAN/JAMESANTHONY 4902EEXETERBLVD PHOENIXAZ85018 4413ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $116,200 $465,000 $581,200 $58,120 $0 $58,120 $414,871 $41,487 $0 $41,487 0.256
VOGELCRAIG
ELLSWORTH/ROUSCULPMICHAEL
136 127Ͳ08Ͳ086 2021 VOGELROUSCULPREVOCABLETRUST PTR 302ENORTHVIEWAVE PHOENIXAZ85020 4443EWELDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $76,200 $304,800 $381,000 $38,100 $0 $38,100 $228,458 $22,846 $0 $22,846 0.247
137 127Ͳ02Ͳ059 2021 WALLACEFAMILYTRUST WALLACEDANIELJ/MARYTR 3411N47THST PHOENIXAZ85018 3411N47THST, PHOENIX85018 $106,800 $427,500 $534,300 $53,430 $0 $53,430 $378,750 $37,875 $0 $37,875 0.239
138 127Ͳ08Ͳ091 2021 WARRENDERADAM/SUMMER 3610N44THPL PHOENIXAZ85018 3610N44THPL, PHOENIX85018 $112,100 $448,600 $560,700 $56,070 $0 $56,070 $372,015 $37,202 $0 $37,202 0.251
139 127Ͳ02Ͳ054B 2021 WITTINGGARYF 5834EOAKST SCOTTSDALEAZ852571935 4748ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $55,300 $398,400 $453,700 $45,370 $0 $45,370 $319,935 $31,994 $0 $31,994 0.245
139 127Ͳ02Ͳ054G 2021 WITTINGGARYF 5834EOAKST SCOTTSDALEAZ852571935 $44,200 $0 $44,200 $4,420 $0 $4,420 $31,113 $3,111 $0 $3,111 0.196
140 127Ͳ02Ͳ015A 2021 WORKMANJOHNV/EILEENG 4710ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ850180000 4710ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $128,100 $512,700 $640,800 $64,080 $0 $64,080 $505,360 $50,536 $0 $50,536 0.449
141 127Ͳ08Ͳ054 2021 WYNNEJOHNP/ERIKAA 4450ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4450ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $98,000 $392,100 $490,100 $49,010 $0 $49,010 $292,846 $29,285 $0 $29,285 0.245
142 127Ͳ08Ͳ052 2021 YEAGERRICHARDM/JEANNEMTR 4440ECLARENDONAVE PHOENIXAZ85018 4440ECLARENDONAVE, PHOENIX85018 $122,100 $488,700 $610,800 $61,080 $0 $61,080 $412,879 $41,288 $0 $41,288 0.243
UniquePropertyOwner $16,523,373 $63,219,700 $79,743,073 $8,033,347 $75,735 $7,957,612 $54,564,853 $5,493,284 $52,588 $5,440,696 41.448
ExemptProperty
AverageLotSize 0.278
Page 204
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Border States Industries, Inc. to provide Rockwell Automation/Allen Bradley
electrical parts and services to maintain operational integrity for the Water Services
and Aviation departments. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item. The agreement will not exceed $1 million.
Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide Rockwell Automation/Allen Bradley
electrical parts and software. The Rockwell Automation/Allen Bradley components are
used in the industrial automation and controls equipment in various operations at the
Water Services Department and to operate the baggage handling systems for the
Aviation Department.
This direct selection is necessary due to Border States Industries, Inc. being the sole
authorized distributor for the proprietary Rockwell Automation/Allen Bradley brand
electrical parts, software, and licenses.
Border States Industries, Inc.’s services include, but are not limited to: automated
electrical parts, programmable logic controllers, maintenance and software.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
An exception to the procurement process was determined to select the Contractor set
forth in City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10. A direct selection was made
because there exists a lack of qualified/available contractors/consultants, which makes
a competitive selection process impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a five-year aggregate term.
Page 205
Financial Impact
The agreement value for Border States Industries, Inc., will not exceed $1 million for
the five-year term.
Funding is available in the Water Services and Aviation departments’ Operating and
Capital Improvement Program budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
and the Water Services and Aviation departments.
Page 206
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
S-48559)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with: Bud Griffin Customer Support - Arizona, LLC; and Loftin Equipment
Company, for generator maintenance, inspection, and repair services in City-owned
facilities. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The aggregate value of the agreements will not exceed $1,089,600.
Summary
The Public Works Department is responsible for maintaining and repairing emergency
standby generators in City-owned facilities. These generator services include annual
and interval inspections, maintenance, and repairs on an as-needed basis for all
generators. The generators provide electrical power to critical sites, buildings, and
systems in the event of a utility electrical power loss. This agreement will also provide
services for facilities maintained by the Aviation, Phoenix Convention Center, and
Water Services departments.
Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid 22-FMD-044 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. Two offers were received by the Public Works Department
Procurement Services Division on Feb. 16, 2022. The offers were evaluated based on
price, responsiveness to all specifications, terms and conditions, and responsibility to
provide the required services. The offers submitted by Bud Griffin Customer Support -
Arizona, LLC and Loftin Equipment Company were deemed fair and reasonable.
Group A - Annual Services and Load Bank Testing:
Bud Griffin Customer Support - Arizona, LLC: $153,215 bid total; and
Loftin Equipment Company: $202,955 bid total
Group B - Interval Maintenance Services:
Loftin Equipment Company: $14,010 bid total
Contract Term
The one-year term of the contracts will begin on or about June 1, 2022. The contracts
Page 207
will include four one-year options to extend the term, for a total contract term of up to
five years if all options are exercised.
Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the agreements, including all option years, is $1,089,600,
including all applicable taxes, with an estimated annual expenditure of $217,920.
Funding is available in the Aviation, Phoenix Convention Center, Water Services and
Public Works departments' budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua, Inger Erickson and
Karen Peters, and the Aviation, Phoenix Convention Center, Water Services and
Public Works departments.
Page 208
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
of Phoenix Lift Station 66 Refurbishment - WS90400084-3 (Ordinance S-48562)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Trenching
Agreement with Arizona Public Service to install electrical facilities for Lift Station 66
Refurbishment project located at 30101 N. Black Canyon Hwy. for Phoenix project
W90400084-3. Further request to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code
42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of
indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. Additionally request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the agreement
will not to exceed $79,371.
Summary
The City is refurbishing a Lift Station that will require installation of new electrical
facilities for operational purposes. The Trenching Agreement is required by Arizona
Public Service in order to proceed with electrical design, as well as installation of
necessary facilities to provide power for the City’s requested needs.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement will begin on or about April 15, 2022, and will expire when
the project is completed and accepted.
Financial Impact
Funding in the amount of $79,371 is available in the Water Services Department's
Capital Improvement Program budget.
Location
30101 N. Black Canyon Hwy.
Council District: 2
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Street Transportation and Water Services departments.
Page 209
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
48563)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with RCI Systems, LLC and AP Fire Protection for backflow testing, repair
and replacement services to be used on an as-needed basis. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. These
agreements will not exceed $5,395,400.
Summary
The Public Works Department is responsible for backflow testing, repair and
replacement services for various City locations. Since 1993, backflow prevention
devices have been required for all City domestic water supply piping, and must be
tested annually and maintained to ensure proper operation and code compliance. The
City is obligated to protect its public water supply from the possibility of contamination
or pollution by installing, inspecting and maintaining backflow prevention devices as
outlined in the Phoenix (Uniform) Plumbing Code and Phoenix City Code Chapter 37 -
Article XII - Backflow Prevention. These agreements also will provide services for City
locations that are maintained by the Housing, Phoenix Convention Center and Water
Services departments.
Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid 22-FMD-036 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. Four offers were received by the Public Works Department
Procurement Services on Jan. 5, 2022. The offers were evaluated based on price,
responsiveness to all specifications, terms and conditions, and responsibility to provide
the required services. The offers submitted by RCI Systems, LLC and AP Fire
Protection were deemed to be fair and reasonable.
Group A - Supply and Installation of Backflow Assemblies:
RCI Systems, LLC: $2,495,796.76 bid total
Group B - Testing of Backflow Prevention Assemblies:
AP Fire Protection: $375,505.00 bid total
Page 210
Contract Term
The initial one-year term of the agreements will begin on or about June 1, 2022. The
agreements include four, one-year options to extend the term, for a total agreement
term of up to five years if all options are exercised.
Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the agreements, including all option years, is $5,395,400,
including all applicable taxes, with an estimated annual expenditure of $1,079,080.
Funds are available in the Housing, Phoenix Convention Center, Water Services, and
Public Works departments' budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is recommended by Deputy City Managers Gina Montes, Inger Erickson and
Karen Peters, and the Housing, Phoenix Convention Center, Water Services and
Public Works departments.
Page 211
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Community (Ordinance S-48572)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Contract 154603
with Rayne of Phoenix to provide additional funding for the Housing Department. The
additional expenditures for services/goods included in this amendment will not exceed
$30,000. The total cost of the agreement, including all amendments, will not exceed
$155,000. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related
to this item.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to allow the Housing Department to install a water
softener in front of the boiler at the Maryvale Parkway senior housing community. The
boiler has recently been replaced due to hard water and calcium build-up and the
water softener is necessary to retain the warranty on the new boiler.
Contract Term
The contract terms will remain unchanged, ending on Oct. 31, 2026.
Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. This item is federally funded with Department
of Housing and Urban Development funds.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved the Water Softener Exchange Rental Services Agreement
154603 (Ordinance S-47607) on June 2, 2021.
Location
Maryvale Parkway Senior Housing Community, 4545 N. Maryvale Parkway
Council District: 5
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Gina Montes, and
the Water Services and Housing departments.
Page 212
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Award (Ordinance S-48573)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with Instrumentation and Controls LLC, and Western Environmental
Equipment Co. for the purpose of providing flow meters for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The agreements will not exceed $910,000.
Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide new flow meters along with replacement
parts and maintenance. Instrumentation and Controls’ and Western Environmental
Equipment Co.'s services include, but are not limited to: new meters, replacement
parts, maintenance and repair services.
Procurement Information
The recommendations were made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process in
accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10. Two vendors
submitted bids and are listed below and all bids were found to be responsive and
responsible.
Selected Bidders
Instrumentation and Controls LLC
Western Environmental Equipment Co.
Contract Term
The agreements will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a five-year aggregate term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for Instrumentation and Controls LLC, and Western
Environmental Equipment Co. will not exceed $910,000.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department’s Operating budget.
Page 213
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 214
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Engineering Services - WS85260024, WS85290023 and WS85320019 (Ordinance
S-48576)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with three consultants listed below, to provide Engineering Services that
include: design support, construction inspection, and commissioning services for the
Electrical, Instrumentation and Control Inspection and Testing Services project. Further
request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreements as necessary within
the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed
$7.5 million.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.
Summary
The purpose of this project is to improve the functionality, efficiency, and maintenance
of the electrical, instrumentation and control systems at the Deer Valley Water
Treatment Plant, 24th Street Water Treatment Plant, and the Union Hills Water
Treatment Plant. The City uses inspection and testing services to assist the Engineer
and Contractor with projects related to the water facilities and their various systems.
The City has developed electrical, instrumentation and control standards for the entire
Water Services Department which are used to provide consistency. This project will
ensure adherence to these standards on all projects during the design, construction,
calibration, testing, and commissioning of these systems.
Page 215
The Engineering consultants' services include, but are not limited to: assist with new
design and construction projects, maintain City of Phoenix arc flash documents, and
assist Operations and Maintenance staff with testing and training needs.
Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-604, the City may not publicly release information on proposals received or
the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Eight firms submitted proposals and
are listed below.
Selected Firms
Rank 1: Black & Veatch Corporation
Rank 2: Brown and Caldwell, Inc.
Rank 3: Oz Engineering, LLC
Additional Proposers
Rank 4: Wilson Engineers, LLC
Rank 5: Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Rank 6: Arcadis U.S., Inc.
Rank 7: Affiliated Engineers, Inc.
Rank 8: Canfield Engineering and Integration, LLC
Contract Term
The term of each agreement is five years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for each of the Engineering consultants will not exceed $2.5
million, including all subconsultants and reimbursable costs.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.
Page 216
Location
Deer Valley Water Treatment Plant
24th Street Water Treatment Plant
Union Hills Water Treatment Plant
Council Districts: 1, 2 and 6
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 217
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with F. S. Brainard & Company, to provide data loggers for the purpose of determining
the amount of water used by various types of devices for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The agreement will not exceed $294,000.
Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide the Water Services Department a cost-
effective way to study water usage and to identify usage patterns of single-family
homes. Additionally, this equipment will help identify areas of potential reductions
during periods of water shortages and will assist to identify water leaks.
This direct selection is necessary because F. S. Brainard & Company is the sole
distributor for Meter Master Data Loggers which are compatible with the TraceWizard
software used by the Water Services Department.
F. S. Brainard & Company’s services include, but are not limited to: new data loggers,
accessories, warranties and all required maintenance.
Procurement Information
An exception to the procurement process was determined to select the Contractor set
forth in City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10. A direct selection was made
because there exists a lack of qualified/available contractors/consultants which makes
a competitive selection process impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2022, for a seven-year aggregate term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for F. S. Brainard & Company will not exceed $294,000.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Operating budget.
Page 218
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 219
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amendment (Ordinance S-48581)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 154184 with Southwest LAN Connections, LLC, to provide additional
funding to the contract. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $400,000.
Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to increase spending authority to Southwest LAN
Connections, LLC, which is responsible for providing on-site professional installation
and maintenance services to include labor, parts, software upgrade services as well as
replacement and/or repair of wireless system components for the Water Services
Department (WSD).
This amendment is necessary because WSD needs to replace and upgrade
approximately 200 wireless radios that have reached end-of-life. The current
manufacturer will no longer produce or repair the radios due to a shortage of parts and
increased production costs. These wireless radios are used in hard-to-reach areas
such as mountaintops and remote sites for the Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition wireless radio system.
Contract Term
The agreement's term will remain unchanged, ending on June 30, 2026.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for agreement for Wireless Radio Maintenance and Repair
was for an expenditure not-to-exceed $990,000. This amendment will increase
authorization for the agreement by an additional $400,000, for a new total not-to-
exceed value of $1.39 million.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Operating budget.
Page 220
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Wireless Radio Maintenance and Repair Agreement
154184 (Ordinance S-47551) on May 19, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 221
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Install Water and Sewer Pipeline Casings (Ordinance S-48583)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Arizona Department of Transportation to install
water and sewer pipeline casings at 43rd and 51st Avenues crossing the State Route
303. Further request to authorize the execution of amendments to the agreement as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority, as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of this
agreement will not exceed $2.3 million.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads, and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.
Summary
The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) will begin construction of two new
interchanges along the State Route 303 (SR303) at 43rd Avenue and 51st Avenue. In
order to avoid impacting the freeway interchanges and the traveling public in the
future, ADOT will install pipeline casings crossing the SR303 at both freeway
interchanges. The pipeline casings will be used for future water and sewer mains
crossing the freeway.
ADOT will install the new pipeline casings through the use of a procured contractor,
and the City will reimburse ADOT for the construction costs associated with
installation.
Page 222
Contract Term
This agreement will begin on or about May 15, 2022 and will end on Dec. 31, 2023.
Financial Impact
The total value for this agreement will not exceed $2.3 million.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Capital Improvement Program
Budget.
Location
SR303 at 43rd and 51st avenues
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 223
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Digester Dome Replacement - Construction Manager at Risk Construction
Services Amendment - WS90100001 (Ordinance S-48592)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 144666 with PCL Construction, Inc., to provide additional Construction
Manager at Risk Construction Services for the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment
Plant Sub-Regional Operating Group Digester Dome Replacement project. Further
request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within
the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional fee for services
included in this amendment will not exceed $600,000.
Summary
The Digester Dome Replacement project is intended to replace the fixed domes
covering four of the 10 anaerobic digesters at the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment
Plant (WWTP) (Digesters 2, 3, 4 and 12). These existing domes are structurally
deficient due to age and the corrosive environment within the digesters. The anaerobic
digesters are critical to the solids treatment process at the plant. Replacement of the
digester domes ensures operation at the highest levels of efficiency and operational
resiliency. The project will include removal of the existing domes, fabrication and
installation of the new domes, rehabilitation and coating of the digesters' interior walls,
installation of protective coatings to the interior of the digester domes, and installation
of roofing material and ancillary equipment on the exterior of the digester domes.
The purpose of this project is to procure the fixed dome for Digester 2 at the 91st
Avenue WWTP. This dome is the second of four fixed domes being replaced as part of
this Sub-Regional Operating Group (SROG) Digester Dome Replacement project.
Construction activities, including demolition of the existing dome for Digester 2 and
installation of the new dome, will be part of this contract through future amendments.
This amendment is necessary to begin the construction phase of the project for
Digester Dome 2. This amendment will provide additional funds and time to the
agreement.
Page 224
The 91st Avenue WWTP is owned by the Sub-Regional Operating Group, which
includes the cities of Tempe, Mesa, Scottsdale, Glendale and Phoenix, and is operated
by the City of Phoenix.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment is one year from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
· The initial agreement for Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services was
approved for an amount not to exceed $925,000.
· An amendment was approved for an additional $1.4 million, including all
subcontractor and reimbursable costs, for a new total amount not to exceed
$2,325,000, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
· This amendment will increase the agreement by an additional $600,000, for a new
total amount not to exceed $2,925,000, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.
Funding for this amendment is available in the Water Services Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately
review and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The SROG Advisory Committee approved the project on Feb. 18, 2016.
The SROG Managers Committee approved the project on March 9, 2016.
The City Council approved:
· Professional Services Agreement 142545 (Ordinance S-42515) on May 4, 2016;
· Pre-Construction Services Agreement 142546 (Ordinance S-42516) on May 4,
2016;
· Construction Services Agreement 144666 (Ordinance S-43343) on March 22, 2017;
and
· Construction Services Agreement 144666 Amendment (Ordinance S-46527) on
April 15, 2020.
Page 225
Location
91st Avenue WWTP
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Karen Peters and Mario Paniagua,
the Water Services Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 226
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Fund and the Bonneville Environmental Foundation for Implementation of the
Cooling Water Conservation Project (Ordinance S-48597)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a non-binding
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the New Venture Fund's BlueCommons
project and the Bonneville Environmental Foundation's Business for Water
Stewardship program for implementation of the cooling water conservation project.
This project aligns with the Commercial Cooling Tower Program recommendation in
the Recommended Water Conservation Measures of the City of Phoenix Water
Conservation Ad-Hoc Committee Final Report.
There is no funding required for the City's participation in the Memorandum of
Understanding.
Summary
In 2019, the Phoenix City Council established the Water Conservation Ad Hoc
Committee (Committee) to make recommendations concerning potential water
conservation programs. One of the recommended programs in the Committee's Final
Report is the Cooling Tower Program, in which the City would "develop a targeted
outreach program to educate commercial and industrial customers" about Phoenix's
successful, large scale water conservation demonstration project at the Sky Harbor
International Airport that involved implementation of relatively simple improvements to
its wet cooling system. In addition, the report suggested that the program "could
ultimately include [a] revolving loan program funded by businesses."
In 2021, the City communicated with New Venture Fund's BlueCommons project
(BlueCommons) and Bonneville Environmental Foundation's Business for Water
Stewardship (BWS) program to gauge interest in collaboratively developing a targeted
outreach and funding mechanism for the Cooling Tower Program through a non-profit
entity that operates a rotating loan program to fund water conservation, or Blue Bank.
The City, BlueCommons and BWS (Parties) have since drafted a non-binding MOU
outlining each party's role in developing the Blue Bank. The City's role is limited to
identifying potentially eligible customers and sharing this information with
BlueCommons, reviewing cooling tower project designs, monitoring plans, verifying
Page 227
and reporting water savings, and promoting the program to customers and other
municipalities.
Procurement Information
In accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10, procurement did
not occur since the City is not procuring goods and services for any consideration. Its
participation will come at no cost to the City.
Contract Term
The MOU will be effective as of the date of execution of the MOU and will remain in
effect during the period of implementation and repayment of the initial projects outlined
in accordance with the MOU. Following completion and repayment of the first project,
and periodically thereafter, the Parties will confer to discuss any needed changes to
staffing and/or other commitments under this MOU and will make recommendations to
the Parties, including renewal of the term of the MOU to cover subsequent phases of
projects.
Financial Impact
There are no funds required for this MOU. The City will dedicate an existing .50 Water
Services Department full-time employee to fulfill the activities outlined in the MOU.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved the Water Conservation Ad Hoc Committee Final Report on
Dec. 10, 2019.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 228
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Plat: 200616
Project: 06-1170
Name of Plat: 21750 North 30th Way
Owner: JSN Trust
Engineer: Brian J. Benedict, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Residential Detached Single Family Plat
Reviewed by Staff: April 6, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Located at 21750 North 30th Way.
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 229
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Thomas Road and East of 16th Street
Plat: 220011
Project: 00-2697
Name of Plat: Phoenix Children's Hospital - Unit IV
Owner: Phoenix Children's Hospital, Inc., An Arizona Nonprofit Corporation
Engineer: Jason Graham, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: April 1, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located south of Thomas Road and east of 16th Street.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 230
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Plat: 210095
Project: 11-1415
Name of Plat: 101 E. Griswold Road
Owner: Brittany Celaya and Andrew Rysdam, David Rysdam
Engineer: David Klein, RLS
Request: A 3 Lot Residential Subdivision
Reviewed by Staff: March 29, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at 101 E. Griswold Road.
Council District: 6
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 231
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Street and Polk Street
Plat: 220002
Project: 19-2299
Name of Plat: 5300 & 5308 E. Polk Street
Owner: Tudo Holdings 1, LLC
Engineer: David S. Klein, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 23, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at the northeast corner of 53rd Street and Polk Street.
Council District: 6
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 232
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Corner of 59th Avenue and Baseline Road
Plat: 210058
Project: 19-4395
Name of Plat: NWC 59th Avenue and Baseline Road
Owner: Laveen Spectrum, LLC
Engineer: Daniel Armijo, RLS
Request: An 8 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 29, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public. This plat needs to record concurrently with Abandonment 220002. The
sequence of recording to be followed is that the resolution of abandonment is recorded
first, then the plat is recorded second.
Location
Generally located at the northwest corner of 59th Avenue and Baseline Road
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 233
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
North of Jones Avenue
Plat: 210100
Project: 17-2555
Name of Plat: Jacquelynn Ranch - Phase 2
Owner: Arroyo Cap III-2, LLC
Engineer: Robert A. Johnson, RLS
Request: A 73 Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Jan. 20, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located east of 99th Avenue and north of Jones Avenue.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 234
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Buren Street and North 44th Street
Plat: 210043
Project: 00-5109
Name of Plat: Lot 1 of Phoenix Preflight
Owner: UGP-Preflight Phoenix LLC
Engineer: Jason A. Segneri, RLS
Request: A 3 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: April 7, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located at the southwest corner of Van Buren Street and North 44th Street.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 235
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Baseline Road
Plat: 210086
Project: 06-2778
Name of Plat: Laveen Park Place
Owner: Laveen Baseline, LLC
Engineer: Jason Segneri, RLS
Request: A 2 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 29, 2022
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.
Location
Generally located west of 59th Avenue and south of Baseline Road.
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 236
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Resolution 22017)
Abandonment: ABND 220002
Project: 19-4395
Applicant: Beth Malvestiti
Request: The 126.05’ x 84.81’ drainage easement on the north side of Baseline Road,
west of 59th Avenue.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Feb. 7, 2022
Summary
The resolution of the abandonment and PLAT 210058 are to be recorded together with
the Maricopa County recorder on the same day, at the same time. The sequence of
recording to be followed is that the resolution is recorded first, then the plat is recorded
second.
Location
5910 West Baseline Road.
Council District: 7
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 237
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Resolution 22018)
Abandonment: ABND 210060
Project: 21-1526
Applicant: Ryan Larsen
Request: Seven-foot Water Easement adjacent to and west of 32nd Street and the 25-
foot Water and Sewer Easement adjacent to and north of South Mountain Avenue.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Jan. 20, 2020
Summary
The resolution of the abandonment and PLAT 210105 are to be recorded together with
the Maricopa County recorder on the same day, at the same time. The sequence of
recording to be followed is that the resolution is recorded first, then the plat is recorded
second.
Location
32nd Street and Highline Canal.
Council District: 8
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 238
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Grand Canyon University PUD) - Multiple Locations Generally Bounded by
Interstate 17 Freeway to 35th Avenue, and Missouri Avenue to Camelback Road
(Including Lots South of Camelback Road) (Ordinance G-6982)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District), R-3 (Multifamily Residence District), and PUD
(Planned Unit Development) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow a major
amendment to the Grand Canyon University PUD to include additional land area.
Summary
Current Zoning: R1-6 (1.45 acres), R-3 (5.03 acres), PUD (296.07)
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 302.55 acres
Proposal: Major amendment to the Grand Canyon University PUD to include additional
land area.
Owner: Grand Canyon University, et al.
Applicant: Taylor Earl, Earl & Curley P.C.
Representative: Taylor Earl, Earl & Curley P.C.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Alhambra Village Planning Committee heard this case on March 22,
2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with a modified
stipulation, by a vote of 15-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on April 7, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the Addendum A staff report, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Multiple locations generally bounded by Interstate 17 Freeway to 35th Avenue, and
Missouri Avenue to Camelback Road (including lots south of Camelback Road).
Council District: 5
Parcel Address: Various addresses
Page 239
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 240
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(Z-3-E-10-5) FROM PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT), R1-
6 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT), AND R-3
(MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO PUD (PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 302.55-acre site located at multiple locations
generally bounded by Interstate 17 Freeway to 35th Avenue, and Missouri Avenue to
Camelback Road (including lots south of Camelback Road), in a portion of Sections 13,
14, 23, and 24 of Township 2 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in
Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from 1.45 acres of “R1-6” (Single-Family Residence
District), 5.03 acres of "R-3” (Multifamily Residence District), and 296.07 acres of “PUD”
(Planned Unit Development), to 302.55 acres of “PUD” (Planned Unit Development).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
Page 241
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Grand Canyon University PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with Development
Narrative date stamped March 17, 2022 as modified by the following
stipulations.
a. Front Cover: Add “City Council adopted: [Insert Adoption date]” below
“Hearing Draft: March 17, 2022
b. Front Cover: Replace the underscore line following “PUD Zoning Case
No. with “Z-3-E-10-5 (Major Amendment E)
c. Throughout the development narrative and exhibits: update all maps,
conceptual plans, and illustrations to depict all properties contained in the
rezoning request.
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study/Statement to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
is reviewed and approved by the City. The Development will be responsible for
all associated dedications and improvement funding as stipulated within the
approved study.
3. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
4. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
5. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
Page 242
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 11th day of May 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (17 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 243
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-3-E-10-5
Within a portion of Sections 14, 14, 23, and 24, Township 2 North, Range 2 East of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more
particularly described as follows:
PARCEL NO. 1 (APN 153-18-012A) 5212 N. 29TH AVENUE
THE EAST HALF OF LOT 12, BLOCK 1, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF
MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 60 FEET.
CONTAINING 35,581 SQ. FT. OR 0.817 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 2 (APN 153-19-025) 5219 N. 28TH DRIVE
LOT 4, BLOCK 1, OF PENNIE TRACT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
RECORDED IN BOOK 43 OF MAPS, PAGE 5
CONTAINING 8,366 SQ. FT. OR 0.192 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 3 (APN 153-19-026) 5223 N. 28TH DRIVE
LOT 5, BLOCK 1, PENNIE TRACT, ACCORDING TO BOOK 43 OF MAPS, PAGE 5,
RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
CONTAINING 8,366 SQ. FT. OR 0.192 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 4 (APN 153-19-028) 5231 N. 28TH DRIVE
LOT 7, BLOCK 1, PENNIE TRACT, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN BOOK 43 OF
MAPS, PAGE 5, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
CONTAINING 8,366 SQ.FT. OR 0.192 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 5 (APN 153-19-029) 5235 N. 28TH DRIVE
LOT 8, BLOCK 1, PENNIE TRACT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA IN
BOOK 43 OF MAPS, PAGE 5.
CONTAINING 8,366 SQ.FT. OR 0.192 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
Page 244
PARCEL NO. 6 (APN 153-19-030) 5239 N. 28TH DRIVE
LOT 9, BLOCK 1, PENNIE TRACT, IN THE CITY OF PHOENIX, COUNTY OF
MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN BOOK 43 OF
MAPS, PAGE 5, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
CONTAINING 8,622 SQ.FT. OR 0.198 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 7 (APN 153-19-035) 5215 N. 29TH AVENUE
LOT (5), BLOCK (2) PENNIE TRACT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORDS IN
THE OFFICE OF MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER IN BOOK 43 OF MAPS, PAGE 5
THEREOF.
CONTAINING 8,207 SQ.FT. OR 0.188 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 8 (APN 153-19-046) 5224 N. 28TH DRIVE
LOT 16, BLOCK 2, PENNIE TRACT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
RECORDED IN BOOK 43 OF MAPS, PAGE 5.
CONTAINING 8,210 SQ.FT. OR 0.188 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 9 (APN 153-28-001H) 5137 N. 29TH AVENUE
LOT 1, BLOCK 4, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18,
RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 146 FEET.
CONTAINING 55,922 SQ.FT. OR 1.284 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 10 (APN 153-28-011) 2731 W. COLTER STREET
THE EAST 65 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET OF LOT 5, BLOCK 4, HOMELAND,
ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA.
CONTAINING 8,714 SQ.FT. OR 0.200 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 11 (APN 153-28-013) 2737 W. COLTER STREET
THE WEST 85 FEET OF LOT 5, BLOCK 4, OF HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA,
COUNTY, ARIZONA.
CONTAINING 11,393 SQ.FT. OR 0.262 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
Page 245
PARCEL NO. 12 (APN 153-28-014) 2727 W. COLTER STREET
THAT PART OF LOT 5, BLOCK 4, OF HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF
RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, RECORDED BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5;
THENCE EASTERLY AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 5, 150 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 5, 75 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 5 TO
THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 5;
THENCE WEST 75 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 5;
THENCE NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 10,057 SQ.FT. OR 0.231 ACRE, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 13 (APN NOS. 153-29-174, 153-29-175, 153-29-176A, & 153-29-176B)
5102, 5106, 5112, & 5116 N. 29TH AVENUE
LOTS 1, 2, AND 3, NORTH 29TH AVENUE ESTATES, ACCORDING TO PLAT
RECORDED IN BOOK 1017 OF MAPS, PAGE 22, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA.
CONTAINING 50,013 SQ.FT. OR 1.148 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 1:
THE SOUTH 120 FEET OF LOT 19, BLOCK 1, RE-PLAT OF STANLEY PARK,
ACCORDING TO BOOK 23 OF MAPS, PAGE 25, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE WEST 7 FEET THEROF AS CONVEYED BY INSTRUMENT RECORD
IN DOCKET 6167, PAGE 575, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA; AN
D
EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 7 FEET OF SAID LOT
19;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 7 FEET TO AN
INTERSECTION WITH A LINE RUN EASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE WEST
Page 246
LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH,
RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, FROM A POINT THEREON WHICH IS 409 FEET
NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER’
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 8.56
FEET OF SAID LOT 19;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19 TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING, AS CONVEYED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN DOCKET
11591, PAGE 201, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
CONTAINS 14,944 SQ. FT OR 0.343 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 2:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA
AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAP IN HAND HOLE MARKING
THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14, FROM WHICH A CITY OF
PHOENIX BRASS CAP IN HAND HOLE MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID SECTION 14 BEARS NORTH 89°55'51” WEST,
2621.08 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 14 NORTH
00°06'04” EAST, 40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST LINE NORTH 00°06'04” EAST, 598.65
FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3, PLAT OF
“HOMELAND” AS RECORDED IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
THENCE LEAVING THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT, NORTH 89°54’46” WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 430.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°06'04" WEST, 598.80 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH
RIGHT OF WAY OF CAMELBACK ROAD;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF CAMLEBACK ROAD, SOUTH
89°55’51” EAST, 430.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 257,446 SQUARE FEET OR 5.910 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Page 247
PARCEL NO. 3:
LOT 1, 31ST AVENUE AND CAMELBACK MINI STORAGE, ACCORDING TO
BOOK 576 OF MAPS, PAGE 44, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
BEING A REPLAT OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK 3, HOMELAND, AS
RECORDED IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA
CONTAINS 203,689 SQUARE FEET OR 4.676 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 4:
THE WEST 74 FEET OF THE NORTH 295 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3,
HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS,
PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
CONTAINS 21,828 SQUARE FEET OR 0.501 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL N0. 5:
THE NORTH 78.5 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 7, OF HOMESITE TRACTS,
ACCORDING TO BOOK 18 OF MAPS, PAGE 48, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 7, OF HOMESITE TRACTS,
ACCORDING TO BOOK 18 OF MAPS, PAGE 48, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 78.5 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 7
CONTAINS 46,947 SQUARE FEET OR 1.078 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 6:
THE WEST HALF OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:
LOT 8, BLOCK 1, OF HOMELAND, A SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF
MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE EAST 470 FEET THEREOF; AND
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX, BY
DEED RECORDED IN DOCKET 2753, PAGE 368, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND AS
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8;
Page 248
THENCE NORTH, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 8, A DISTANCE OF 165.36
FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8;
THENCE EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 8, TO A POINT WHICH IS
470 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8;
THENCE SOUTH, PARALLEL TO AND 470 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF
SAID LOT 8, A DISTANCE OF 8 FEET;
THENCE WEST, PARALLEL TO AND 8 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
LOT 8, TO A POINT WHICH IS 8 FEET SOUTH AND 25 FEET EAST OF THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8;
THENCE SOUTH, PARALLEL TO AND 25 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID
LOT 8, TO A POINT WHICH IS 35 FEET NORTH AND 25 FEET EAST OF THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY TO A POINT WHICH IS 25 FEET NORTH AND 35 FEET
EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8;
THENCE EAST, PARALLEL TO AND 25 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID LOT 8, TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 8;
THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 8, A DISTANCE OF 25
FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8;
THENCE WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 8, A DISTANCE OF 627.5
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 8,760 SQUARE FEET OR 0.201 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 7:
THE WEST 15 FEET OF THE NORTH 8 FEET OF THE EAST 398 FEET OF LOT 6,
BLOCK 1, OF HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, RECORDED
BOOK 15 OF MAPS; PAGE 18; TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 120 SQUARE FEET OR 0.003 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 8:
THE EAST 74 FEET OF THE WEST 204 FEET OF LOT 7, BLOCK 3, OF HOMELAND,
ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA.
CONTAINS 24,665 SQUARE FEET OR 0.566 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Page 249
PARCEL NO. 9:
A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED WITHIN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION
23, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE
AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF "TRACT S", NORTHWEST
VILLAGE UNIT FOUR, ACCORDING TO BOOK 55 OF MAPS, PAGE 49, RECORDS
OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT "S", ALSO BEING THE SOUTH RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE OF CAMELBACK ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 42.26 FEET, TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, CONTINUING
ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY LINE AND SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 191.74 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 00
DEGREES 00 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 39 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF
31.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 29TH AVENUE;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TRACT "S" AND THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF 29TH AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 166.69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, DEPARTING
SAID EAST BOUNDARY LINE AND WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF
34.96 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
94.90 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
109.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
119.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN
DESCRIBED.
CONTAINS 29,721 SQ. FT OR 0.682 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
Page 250
PARCEL NO. 10:
THE SOUTH 150 FEET OF LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OF HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, RECORDED BOOK 15 OF MAPS; PAGE 18;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 75 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE EAST 164.09 FEET THEREOF:
CONTAINS 10,070 SQ. FT OR 0.231 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 11:
THE NORTH 75 FEET OF THE SOUTH 150 FEET OF THE EAST 164.09 FEET OF
LOT 2, BLOCK 4 OF HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN
BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPT THE EAST 25 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINS 10,465 SQ. FT OR 0.240 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 12:
LOTS 3 AND 6, BLOCK 1, OF PENNIE TRACT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF
RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA, RECORDED IN BOOK 43 OF MAPS, PAGE 5.
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS:
LOTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17 AND 18, BLOCK 2, OF PENNIE
TRACT, ACCORDING TO BOOK 43 OF MAPS, PAGE 5, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF GEORGIA AVENUE, AS
ABANDONED BY RESOLUTION NO 16556, AND RECORD IN DOCUMENT NO 85-
0185520, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA LYING BETWEEN THE
NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 11 AND THE
NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 12, BLOCK 2, PENNIE
TRACT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, RECORDED IN BOOK
43 OF MAPS, PAGE 5.
CONTAINS 156,178 SQUARE FEET OR 3.585 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
Page 251
PARCEL NO. 13:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, BLOCK 2, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF
MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT;
THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE 214 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT
BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE WEST HALF
OF SAID LOT 4;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE WEST
HALF OF LOT 4, 80 FEET;
THENCE WEST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT, 214 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT;
THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 80 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 17,096 SQUARE FEET OR 0.392 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 14:
ALL THAT PORTION AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN SPECIAL WARRANTY
DEED RECORDED UNDER DOCUMENT NUMBERS (----------), RECORDS OF
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL NO. 1:
LOTS 1, 2 AND 8, RANDY ACRES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RECORD IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
RECORDED IN BOOK 83 OF MAPS, PAGE 2.
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THE NORTH 120 FEET OF LOT 3, BLOCK 4, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK
15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORD OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE EAST 8 FEET THEREOF: AND
EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN 28TH DRIVE AND COLTER STREET, AS
SAID STREETS IS SHOWN ON PLAT OF RANDY ACRES, AS RECORDED IN BOOK
83 OF MAPS, PAGE 2, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
CONTAINS 34,658 SQ. FT OR 0.796 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Page 252
PARCEL NO. 15:
THE SOUTH 257 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT 13, BLOCK 4, OF HOMELAND
ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 7 FEET THEREOF AS CONVEYED TO MARICOPA COUNTY
BY QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED IN DOCKET 2151, PAGE 474, RECORDS OF
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
CONTAINS 20,485 SQ. FT OR 0.470 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 16:
LOT 4, BLOCK 4, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18,
RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPTH THE SOUTH 25 FEET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX IN
DOCKET 7339, PAGE 218, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA; AND
EXCEPT THE WEST 8 FEET AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX
INDOCKET 7367, PAGE 499, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL;
LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 4, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS,
PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE EAST 456.67 FEET; AND
EXCEPT THE WEST 16 FEET THEREOF; AND
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 7, DESCBRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 25 FEET
OF SAID LOT, WITH THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY
AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 45 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH IS THE
INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 45 FEET OF SAID LOT, WITH
THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 20 FEET THEREOF;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, TO A
POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 12 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY IN
THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 25 FEET OF SAID LOT;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE
OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY IN
THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT;
Page 253
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
AND ALSO
EXCEPT THE NORTH 25 FEET OF LOT 7; AND ALSO
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF LOT 8; AND ALSO
EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF LYING NORTH OF THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR
CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 45 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH IS
LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 45 FEET
OF SAID LOT 7 WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 20 FEET OF LOT 7.
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THAT PORTION OF THE ABANDONED ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY, AS SET FORTH IN
RESOLUTION RECORDED IN DOCKET 15975, PAGE 1030, RECORDS
OFMARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE WEST 16 FEET OF LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 4, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO
BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF SAID
LOT 8; AND
EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF LYING WITHIN 45 FEET OF THE POINT OF
INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 45 FEET OF SAID LOT 7 WITH
THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 20 FEET OF SAID LOT 7.
CONTAINS 150,735 SQ. FT OR 3.460 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 17:
THE WEST 108 FEET OF LOT 12, BLOCK 2, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK
15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF:
CONTAINS 14,139 SQ.FT. OR 0.325 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 18:
THE WEST 25 FEET OF LOT 14 IN BLOCK 2, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18 THEREOF.
CONTAINS 4,023 SQ.FT. OR 0.092 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 19:
THE EAST 75 FEET OF THE WEST 150 FEET OF THE EAST 414 FEET OF LOT 12,
BLOCK 2, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS
OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 35 FEET THEREOF.
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL;
Page 254
THE WEST 75 FEET OF THE EAST 414 FEET OF LOT 12, BLOCK 2, HOMELAND,
ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINS 19,267 SQ.FT. OR 0.442 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 20
THE EAST 267.50 FEET OF LOT 15, BLOCK 2, OF HOMELAND, A SUBDIVISION
RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER IN BOOK
15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE EAST 7 FEET THEREOF:
CONTAINS 41,935 SQUARE FEET OR 0.963 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 21
LOT 13, BLOCK 2, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18,
RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE WEST 350 FEET THEREOF;
EXCEPT THE EAST 7 FEET THEREOF:
CONTAINS 43,137 SQUARE FEET OR 0.990 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 22:
THE EAST 127 FEET OF THE NORTH 84 FEET OF LOT 11, BLOCK 2, HOMELAND,
ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE EAST 7 FEET THEREOF.
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING THE DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THE EAST 130 FEET OF LOT 12, BLOCK 2, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15
OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF; AND
EXCEPT THE EAST 7 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINS 26,191 SQUARE FEET OR 0.601 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Page 255
PARCEL NO. 23:
THE EAST 177 FEET OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK 2, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO
BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18 RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE EAST 7 FEET OF SAID LOTS 9 AND 10; AND
EXCEPT A PARCEL OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE WEST LINE OF
SAID EAST 7 FEET OF SAID LOT 9, ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID LOT 9 AND ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 12 FEET AND BEING
TANGENT TO THE WEST LINE AND TO SAID SOUTH LINE;
CONTAINS 49,617 SQUARE FEET OR 1.139 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 24:
THE EAST 40 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE WEST 385 FEET OF LOT 5,
BLOCK 4, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 15 OF
MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL;
LOT 5, BLOCK 4, HOMELAND ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 15
OF MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE WEST 385 FEET THEREOF
EXCEPT THE EAST 222 FEET THEREOF.
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THE WEST 60 FEET OF THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE WEST 385 FEET OF LOT 5,
BLOCK 4, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 15 OF
MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THE WEST 60 FEET OF THE EAST 160 FEET OF THE WEST 385 FEET OF LOT 5,
BLOCK 4, HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 15 OF
MAPS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
CONTAINS 23,724 SQUARE FEET OR 0.545 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 25:
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORHTWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24,
Page 256
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE NORTH 42 FEET; AND
EXCEPT THE EAST 10 FEET; AND
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 25 FEET; AND
EXCEPT THE WEST 170.48 FEET; AND
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PHOENIX IN DOCUMENT
RECORDED JULY 13, 2007 IN RECORDING NO. 2007-799760 AND RE-RECORDED
APRIL 16, 2009 IN RECORDING NO. 2009-337839 AND BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 24;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24, TO THE
EAST LINE OF THE WEST 170.48 FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
NORTH 42 FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 19 FEET TO AN
ORTHOGONAL LINE DESIGNATED HEREIN AS LINE “A”;
THENCE CONTINUING EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 12
FEET, TO AN ORTHOGONAL LINE DESIGNATED HEREIN AS LINE “B”
THENCE CONTINUING EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 30
FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE NORTH 50 FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER AND SAID LINE “B”;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID LINE “B”, A DISTANCE OF 4 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE NORTH 59 FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER AND LINE “A”;
Page 257
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 19 FEET
TO SAID EAST LINE;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
CONTAINS 37,637 SQ. FT OR 0.864 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 26:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, LYING WEST OF
THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE BLACK CANYON HIGHWAY, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 630.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 42.00 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST, 428.04 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST 59.84 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 56 SECONDS WEST 123.83 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 22 SECONDS WEST 304.21 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST 59.94 FEET TO
THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 25,693 SQ. FT OR 0.590 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 27:
THAT PORTION OFTHE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OFTHE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, LYING WEST OF
THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE BLACK CANYON HIGHWAY, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST 792.26 FEET;
Page 258
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST 41.97 FEET TO A
CORNER POINT ON DEED RECORDED IN RECORDING NO. 86-531860 AND THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST 302.59 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST 125.45 FEET TO A
POINT ON A NORTH LINE ON DEED RECORDED IN RECORDING NO. 86-531860;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST 458.35 FEET TO
THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF THE BLACK CANYON HIGHWAY
(INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 17);
THENCE SOUTH 06 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST 40.06 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST 276.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST 159.56 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 45 SECONDS WEST 15.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 229.17 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST 141.84 FEET TO
THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 79,924 SQUARE FEET OR 1.835 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
PARCEL NO. 28:
INTENTIONALLY REMOVED.
PARCEL NO. 29:
LOT 12, BLOCK 2, OF HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18,
RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE EAST 414.00 FEET; AND
EXCEPT THE WEST 108 FEET; AND
EXCEPT THE NORTH 10 FEET; AND
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 30.00 FEET AS QUIT CLAIMED
TO MARICOPA COUNTY IN DOCKET 406, PAGE 197, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA
Page 259
CONTAINS 13,456 SQ.FT. OR 0.309 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL NO. 30:
LOT 12, BLOCK 2, OF HOMELAND, ACCORDING TO BOOK 15 OF MAPS, PAGE 18,
RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;
EXCEPT THE EAST 130.00 FEET THEREOF;
EXCEPT THE WEST 360.55 FEET THEREOF;
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 30.00 FEET AS CONVEYED TO
MARICOPA COUNTY IN DOCKET 406, PAGE 197, RECORDS OF MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA
EXCEPT THE NORTH 10 FEET THEREOF.
CONTAINS 17,549 SQ.FT. OR 0.403 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Page 260
Page 261
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Approximately 375 Feet West of the Southwest Corner of 19th Avenue and
Southern Avenue (Ordinance G-6983)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District), Approved C-1 (Neighborhood Retail District)
to C-2 (Intermediate Commercial District) to allow commercial uses. This is a
companion case to Z-SP-7-21-8 and must be heard first, followed by Z-SP-7-21-8.
Summary
Current Zoning: R1-6 (Approved C-1)
Proposed Zoning: C-2
Acreage: 5.85 acres
Proposed Use: Commercial uses
Owner: Shops at South Mountain
Applicant: Shawn Valk, Platinum Construction
Representative: Taylor Earl, Earl & Curley, P.C.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this case on
March 8, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of
12-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on April 7, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the South Mountain Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 375 feet west of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Southern
Avenue.
Council District: 8
Parcel Addresses: 6150 and 6170 S. 19th Ave., and 1955 and 1975 W. Southern Ave.
Page 262
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 263
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-78-21-8) FROM R1-6 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT), APPROVED C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD
RETAIL DISTRICT) TO C-2 (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 5.85-acre site located approximately 375 feet
west of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Southern Avenue in a portion of
Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit
“A,” is hereby changed from “R1-6” (Single-Family Residence District), Approved “C-1”
(Neighborhood Retail District) to “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
Page 264
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. All building elevations shall be developed to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department:
a. All building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials
and textural changes that exhibit quality and durability to provide a
decorative and aesthetic treatment.
b. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in
window size and location, and/or overhang canopies.
c. No bay or loading doors shall be located on perimeter building elevations
facing a perimeter property line.
d. No windows shall be located on perimeter building elevations facing a
residential property line.
2. A minimum 25-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided adjacent to the
south and west property lines, planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
evergreen trees, planted 20-feet on-center or in equivalent groupings to provide a
minimum 30-foot solid vertical screen at maturity, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
3. All perimeter walls visible from the streets shall include material and textural
differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element, such
as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
4. All uncovered surface parking lot areas for employees and customers shall be
landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper size large canopy drought tolerant shade
trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve
25% shade at maturity, as approved by Planning and Development Department.
5. All public sidewalks shall have a minimum 75% shade provided by shade trees at
maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
6. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, these shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
Page 265
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
7. A minimum of two bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
8. A minimum 5-foot wide detached sidewalk shall be provided along 19th Avenue
and Southern Avenue. A minimum 10-foot wide landscape strip shall be located
between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy shade trees planted a minimum of 25
feet on center or in equivalent groupings.
b. Minimum 5-gallon shrubs providing 75% live cover at maturity.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
9. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
10. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to future
owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall
be approved by the Planning and Development Department.
11. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis
review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
12. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
13. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I
data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist,
Page 266
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
14. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
15. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 11th day of May, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
Page 267
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 268
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-78-21-8
That portion the Northeast quarter of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 2 East of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being a portion of Lot
1 as said lot is shown on the plat entitled "QUIK.TRIP #434" recorded on February 7,
2008, in Book 971, of Maps, at page 20, Maricopa County Records, described as
follows:
Commencing at a found City of Phoenix brass cap in a hand hole at the Northeast
Comer of said Section 36, from which a found City of Phoenix brass cap in a hand hole
at the North quarter comer of said Section 36 bears South 89 degrees 42 minutes 54
seconds West, a distance of 2627.47 feet;
Thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes 54 seconds West, along the North line of said
Northeast quarter of Section 36, a distance of 632.01 feet;
Thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 55.00 feet, to a
point on the South right-of-way line of Southern Avenue, said point also being the True
Point of Beginning; Thence North 89°42'54" East, along a line parallel with, and 55.00
feet South of said North line, a distance of 256.38 feet;
Thence South 00°17'06" East, a distance of371.33 feet; Thence South 89°42'54" West,
a distance of 103.I 7 feet; Thence South 45°05'48" West, a distance of 220.22 feet; to a
PK nail w/ tag "LS 37172", Thence North 00°06'02" East, a distance of 526.02 feet to
the True Point of Beginning.
Containing 107,703 square feet, or 2.473 acres of land, more or less.
That portion the Northeast quarter of section 36, Township 1 North, Range 2 East of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being a portion of Lot
1 as said lot is shown on the plat entitled "QUIKTRIP #434" recorded on February 7,
2008, in Book 971, of Maps, at page 20, Maricopa County Records, described as
follows:
Commencing at a found City of Phoenix brass cap in a hand hole at the Northeast
Comer of said Section 36, from which a found City of Phoenix brass cap in a hand hole
at the North quarter comer of said Section 36 bears South 89 degrees 42 minutes 54
seconds West, a distance of 2627.47 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 02
seconds West, along the East line of said Northeast quarter of Section 36, a distance of
581.01 feet;
Thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes 54 seconds West, a distance of 50.00 feet, to a
point on the West right-of-way line of 19th Avenue, said point also being the True Point
Page 269
of Beginning; Thence South 89°42'54" West, a distance of 582.02 feet; to a PK nail w/
tag "LS 37172" Thence North 45°05'48" East, a distance of 220.22 feet;
Thence North 89°42'54" East, a distance of 103.17 feet; Thence North 00°17'06" West,
a distance of 126.93 feet;
Thence North 89°42'54" East, a distance of 324.00 feet to a point on said West right-of-
way line of 19th Avenue, which lies 50.00 feet West of the East Line of said Northeast
quarter of Section 36; Thence South 00°06'02" West, along a line parallel with, and
50.00 feet West of said East line, a distance of 281.61 feet to the True Point of
Beginning.
Containing 119,054 square feet, or 2.733 acres of land, more or less.
Page 270
Page 271
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Approximately 375 Feet West of the Southwest Corner of 19th Avenue and
Southern Avenue (Ordinance G-6984)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
from R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District), Approved C-1 (Neighborhood Retail
District) (Pending C-2) (Intermediate Commercial District) to C-2 SP (Intermediate
Commercial District, Special Permit) to allow a self-service storage warehouse facility
and underlying commercial uses. This is a companion case to Z-78-21-8 and must be
heard after Z-78-21-8.
Summary
Current Zoning: R1-6 (Approved C-1) (Pending C-2)
Proposed Zoning: C-2 SP
Acreage: 5.85 acres
Proposed Use: Self-service storage warehouse facility and underlying commercial
uses
Owner: Shops at South Mountain
Applicant: Shawn Valk, Platinum Construction
Representative: Taylor Earl, Earl & Curley, P.C.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this case on
March 8, 2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of
11-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on April 7, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the South Mountain Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 375 feet west of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Southern
Avenue.
Council District: 8
Page 272
Parcel Addresses: 6150 and 6170 S. 19th Ave., and 1955 and 1975 W. Southern Ave.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 273
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-SP-7-21-8) FROM R1-6 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT), APPROVED C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD
RETAIL DISTRICT), PENDING C-2 (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) TO C-2 SP (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL, SPECIAL PERMIT DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 5.85-acre site located approximately 375 feet
west of the southwest corner of 19th Avenue and Southern Avenue in a portion of
Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit
“A,” is hereby changed from “R1-6” (Single-Family Residence District), Approved “C-1”
(Neighborhood Retail District), Pending “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial District) to “C-2
SP” (Intermediate Commercial, Special Permit District) to allow self-service storage
warehouse facility and underlying commercial uses.
Page 274
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. All building elevations shall be developed to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department:
a. All building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials
and textural changes that exhibit quality and durability to provide a
decorative and aesthetic treatment.
b. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in
window size and location, and/or overhang canopies.
c. No bay or loading doors shall be located on perimeter building elevations
facing a perimeter property line.
d. No windows shall be located on perimeter building elevations facing a
residential property line.
2. A minimum 25-foot-wide landscape setback shall be provided adjacent to the
south and west property lines, planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
evergreen trees, planted 20-feet on-center or in equivalent groupings to provide a
minimum 30-foot solid vertical screen at maturity, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
3. Where trailers or motor vehicles are placed in outdoor storage areas, these shall
be located a minimum of 75 feet from a property line abutting a public street or
residential use, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
4. Light fixtures in open canopies shall be recessed or flush with the lowest point of
the fascia, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
5. All perimeter walls visible from the streets shall include material and textural
differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element, such
Page 275
as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
6. All uncovered surface parking lot areas for employees and customers shall be
landscaped with minimum 2-inch caliper size large canopy drought tolerant shade
trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve
25% shade at maturity, as approved by Planning and Development Department.
7. All public sidewalks shall have a minimum 75% shade provided by shade trees at
maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
8. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, these shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
9. A minimum of two bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
10. A minimum 5-foot wide detached sidewalk shall be provided along 19th Avenue
and Southern Avenue. A minimum 10-foot wide landscape strip shall be located
between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy shade trees planted a minimum of 25
feet on center or in equivalent groupings.
b. Minimum 5-gallon shrubs providing 75% live cover at maturity.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
11. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
12. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to future
owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall
be approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 276
13. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis
review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
14. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
15. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I
data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
16. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
17. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 11th day of May, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Page 277
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 278
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-SP-7-21-8
That portion the Northeast quarter of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 2 East of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being a portion of Lot
1 as said lot is shown on the plat entitled "QUIK.TRIP #434" recorded on February 7,
2008, in Book 971, of Maps, at page 20, Maricopa County Records, described as
follows:
Commencing at a found City of Phoenix brass cap in a hand hole at the Northeast
Comer of said Section 36, from which a found City of Phoenix brass cap in a hand hole
at the North quarter comer of said Section 36 bears South 89 degrees 42 minutes 54
seconds West, a distance of 2627.47 feet;
Thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes 54 seconds West, along the North line of said
Northeast quarter of Section 36, a distance of 632.01 feet;
Thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 55.00 feet, to a
point on the South right-of-way line of Southern Avenue, said point also being the True
Point of Beginning; Thence North 89°42'54" East, along a line parallel with, and 55.00
feet South of said North line, a distance of 256.38 feet;
Thence South 00°17'06" East, a distance of371.33 feet; Thence South 89°42'54" West,
a distance of 103.I 7 feet; Thence South 45°05'48" West, a distance of 220.22 feet; to a
PK nail w/ tag "LS 37172", Thence North 00°06'02" East, a distance of 526.02 feet to
the True Point of Beginning.
Containing 107,703 square feet, or 2.473 acres of land, more or less.
That portion the Northeast quarter of section 36, Township 1 North, Range 2 East of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being a portion of Lot
1 as said lot is shown on the plat entitled "QUIKTRIP #434" recorded on February 7,
2008, in Book 971, of Maps, at page 20, Maricopa County Records, described as
follows:
Commencing at a found City of Phoenix brass cap in a hand hole at the Northeast
Comer of said Section 36, from which a found City of Phoenix brass cap in a hand hole
at the North quarter comer of said Section 36 bears South 89 degrees 42 minutes 54
seconds West, a distance of 2627.47 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 02
seconds West, along the East line of said Northeast quarter of Section 36, a distance of
581.01 feet;
Thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes 54 seconds West, a distance of 50.00 feet, to a
point on the West right-of-way line of 19th Avenue, said point also being the True Point
Page 279
of Beginning; Thence South 89°42'54" West, a distance of 582.02 feet; to a PK nail w/
tag "LS 37172" Thence North 45°05'48" East, a distance of 220.22 feet;
Thence North 89°42'54" East, a distance of 103.17 feet; Thence North 00°17'06" West,
a distance of 126.93 feet;
Thence North 89°42'54" East, a distance of 324.00 feet to a point on said West right-of-
way line of 19th Avenue, which lies 50.00 feet West of the East Line of said Northeast
quarter of Section 36; Thence South 00°06'02" West, along a line parallel with, and
50.00 feet West of said East line, a distance of 281.61 feet to the True Point of
Beginning.
Containing 119,054 square feet, or 2.733 acres of land, more or less.
Page 280
Page 281
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
21-7 - Southeast Corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road (Resolution 22015)
Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. This is a companion case to Z-79-21-7 and must be heard first, followed by
Z-79-21-7.
Summary
Application: GPA-EST-2-21-7
Current Designation: Commercial (4.99 acres) and Public/Quasi-Public (14.89 acres)
Proposed Designation: Industrial (19.88 acres)
Acreage: 19.88 acres
Proposed Use: Industrial redevelopment of the property
Owner: Murphy School District No. 21
Applicant: Merit Partners
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this case on March 15,
2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on April 7, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation
by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road.
Council District: 7
Parcel Addresses: 2615 and 2675 W. Buckeye Road, and 1441 and 1515 S. 27th Ave.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 282
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-EST-2-21-
7, CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.
AF ____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
T
SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by
Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-EST-2-21-7. The 19.88 acres
of property located at the southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road is
R
designated as Industrial.
SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as
D
shown below:
Page 283
AF
T
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 11th day of May 2022.
MAYOR
R
ATTEST:
____________________________
D
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
-2- Resolution
Page 284
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:___________________________
___________________________
REVIEWED BY:
______________________________
AF
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
T
PL:tml:LF22-3300:2-20-22:2231057v1
R
D
-3- Resolution
Page 285
Attachment B
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
March 7, 2022
Application: GPA-EST-2-21-7
Applicant: Merit Partners
Owner: Murphy School District No. 21
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Location: Southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye
Road
Acreage: 19.88 acres
Current Plan Designation: Commercial (4.99 acres) and Public/Quasi-Public
(14.89 acres)
Requested Plan Designation: Industrial (19.88 acres)
Reason for Requested Change: Minor General Plan Amendment to change the
designation to industrial to allow for industrial
redevelopment of the property
Estrella Village Planning
Committee Date: March 15, 2022
Staff Recommendation: Approval
FINDINGS:
1) The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Industrial would allow
uses such as warehousing, manufacturing, and processing, which are consistent
in character with the land uses in the surrounding area.
2) The companion rezoning case, Z-79-21-7, proposes an industrial use of the site
that is consistent in scale and character with land uses in the general area.
Page 286
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-2-21-7
Page 2
3) The subject site is appropriate for industrial use at the corner of two arterial
streets and in close proximity to a freeway, serving as major transportation
routes.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is located on the southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road
and was formerly used as the Garcia Elementary School until the use was discontinued
by the Murphy Elementary School District in 2018. The companion Rezoning Case No.
Z-79-21-7 is requesting to rezone the subject site from C-3 (General Commercial
District) and R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) to A-1 (Light Industrial District) to allow
light industrial development. Two new light industrial buildings are proposed to replace
the existing unused former school buildings on the subject site.
The General Plan Land Use Map designates the subject site as Commercial in the
northern portion of the site and Public/Quasi-Public in the southern portion of the site.
The Commercial land use designation accommodates office, retail, service, and multi-
family development at varying scales and intensity of uses. The Public/Quasi-Public
designation includes schools, churches, wastewater treatment plants, landfills,
government complexes and utility facilities. The former school use was consistent with
the Public/Quasi-Public designation.
In 1999, the City of Phoenix approved the Estrella Village Plan, which identified goals,
objectives, and strategies pertaining to growth, the village core, protection of residential
neighborhoods, housing and employment, and urban design among other elements.
The proposed land use map in the Estrella Village Plan identifies the subject site with
the same land use designation as the General Plan.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment to Industrial will allow a land
use map designation that is consistent with the concurrent rezoning case, Z-79-21-7,
which proposes a light industrial use. The Industrial land use designation allows for
warehousing, manufacturing, and processing businesses. These uses located at the
subject site would be appropriate, as it is located along two arterial streets, near a
freeway, and is surrounded by zoning of similar intensity. These uses located at the
subject site would provide employment opportunities for the area at a context-
appropriate location, allowing truck traffic to utilize arterial streets, and minimizing
impacts on residential uses.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment is located in the eastern portion
of the Estrella Village and is generally bounded by Buckeye Road to the north, the Pima
Street alignment to the south, 27th Avenue to the west, and west of 25th Avenue to the
east.
Page 287
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-2-21-7
Page 3
North of the subject site, across Buckeye Road, there is a large-scale auto parts store,
zoned C-3 (General Commercial District) and A-2 (Industrial District) and designated as
Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map.
East of the subject site is a used auto salvage yard zoned A-1 (Light Industrial District)
and designated as Industrial on the General Plan Land Use Map.
South of the subject site is a construction equipment supplier with open equipment
storage zoned A-2 (Industrial District) and designated as Industrial on the General Plan
Land Use Map.
West of the subject site, near the southwest corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road,
is a gas station and Phoenix Fire Department station, zoned C-3 (General Commercial
District) and designated Commercial on the General Plan Land Use Map. Furthermore,
the General Plan Land Use Map has designated properties as Industrial and Residential
3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre across 27th Avenue. These properties include a vacant
lot, a truck trailer storage lot, a general contractor’s yard, and a union office.
Existing General Plan Land Use Map designation, Source: Planning and Development Department
Page 288
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-2-21-7
Page 4
RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES
• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels
of increased intensity, respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment and companion rezoning
case will allow industrial redevelopment of a property containing unused former
educational facilities. This will allow productive use of the property that is
surrounded by similar intensity industrial and commercial uses, not impacting any
residential neighborhoods in the area. Furthermore, the site is appropriately
located at the corner of two arterial streets and within a half mile of the Interstate
17, providing adequate transportation options. Lastly, as stipulated through the
companion rezoning case, the development will incorporate appropriate
development standards respectful of local conditions and surrounding
neighborhoods.
STRENGTHEN OUR LOCAL ECONOMY
• MANUFACTURING/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT: LAND USE PRINCIPLE:
Support the expansion of industrial zoning in targeted industrial areas.
The proposed minor General Plan Land Use Map Amendment, along with the
companion rezoning case, Z-79-21-7, will expand industrial zoning to the subject
site, at an appropriate location for industrial development. This will provide job
generating uses that strengthen Phoenix’s industrial sector and add to a diverse
set of employment opportunities.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY
• TREES AND SHADE: DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into
the design of new development and redevelopment projects throughout
Phoenix.
As stipulated in the companion rezoning case Z-79-21-7, the proposed industrial
development will incorporate standards that require trees and shade to be
provided on the property and along the perimeters. The development, as
stipulated, will include enhanced landscape setbacks and detached sidewalks
along both street frontages to provide additional shade to pedestrians and will
include shaded employee nodes within the property.
Page 289
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-2-21-7
Page 5
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommendation for GPA-EST-2-21-7 is to approve as filed, as Industrial.
The proposed land use map designation is consistent in scale and character with the
existing land uses in the surrounding area. The subject site has adequate access for
industrial uses, as the site is at the corner of two arterial streets and is in close proximity
to a freeway. The Industrial land use designation will allow for a variety of uses, such as
warehousing, manufacturing, and processing that are well-suited for the location of the
subject site. The companion case, Z-79-21-7, as stipulated, will provide compatibility
with the surrounding area and enhance the design elements of the site. Approval of the
request will facilitate the redevelopment of an underutilized site with uses that are
compatible with the surrounding area and provide job generating uses for the local
community.
Writer
Anthony Grande
March 7, 2022
Team Leader
Joshua Bednarek
Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Page 290
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-EST-2-21-7 ACRES: +/- 19.88 REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: ESTRELLA COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7
APPLICANT: MERIT PARTNERS
EXISTING:
Public/Quasi Public ( +/- 14.89 Acres)
Commercial ( +/- 4.99 Acres)
27TH AVE
Proposed Change Area
BUCKEYE RD
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Commercial
Industrial
YUMA ST
Public/Quasi-Public
PIMA ST
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Industrial ( +/- 19.88 Acres)
27TH AVE
Proposed Change Area
Industrial BUCKEYE RD
YUMA ST
PIMA ST
Page 291
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-EST-2-21-7_B&W ACRES: +/- 19.88 REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: ESTRELLA COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7
APPLICANT: MERIT PARTNERS
EXISTING:
Public/Quasi Public ( +/- 14.89 Acres)
Commercial ( +/- 4.99 Acres)
27TH AVE
Proposed Change Area
BUCKEYE RD
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/acre
Commercial
Industrial
YUMA ST
Public/Quasi-Public
PIMA ST
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Industrial ( +/- 19.88 Acres)
27TH AVE
Proposed Change Area
Industrial BUCKEYE RD
YUMA ST
PIMA ST
Page 292
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-EST-2-21-7
Date of VPC Meeting March 15, 2022
Request From To amend the General Plan Land Use Designation on
approximately 19.88 acres located at the southeast
corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road from
Commercial and Public/Quasi-Public to Industrial to
allow light industrial uses.
Proposed Use Light Industrial
Location Southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation in the staff
report
VPC Vote 7-0, motion passed; None in dissent.
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases GPA-EST-2-21-7 and Z-79-21-7 were heard concurrently.
No members of the public registered to speak on these items.
Anthony Grande, staff, introduced himself an provided a combined presentation for
companion cases GPA-EST-2-21-7 and Z-79-21-7. Mr. Grande discussed the
location of the site, noting surrounding land uses including industrial uses along 27th
Avenue and Buckeye Road. Mr. Grande discussed the existing General Plan Land
Use map designation of Industrial, the Estrella Village Plan, the Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program, and other policy documents including the
General Plan. The conceptual site plan and building elevations for the two proposed
industrial buildings was discussed. Mr. Grande concluded the presentation by
providing a staff recommendation of approval and describing the proposed
stipulations for case Z-79-21-7, as presented in the staff report.
Jason Morris, with Withey Morris PLC, introduced himself as the applicant and
discussed the location of the site, surrounding uses, and existing site conditions. Mr.
Morris discussed the history of industrial uses that exist in the area and discussed
how policy plans including the General Plan supported the requested Land Use Map
designation and A-1 zoning. Mr. Morris explained the different building materials plus
elements used in the building and proposed perimeter landscaping and concluded
the presentation by requesting approval of these two cases.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 293
Lisa Perez asked if the Fire Department had provided comments on the case. Mr.
Morris stated that he had received comments from the Fire Department but had
addressed these and that they did not have any further concerns.
Ms. Perez stated that she is in support of this use due to the buffering and
landscaping provided.
Parris Wallace asked for the project to include electric vehicle charging stations.
Ms. Perez supported this request. Mr. Morris stated that this will be discussed with
the developer of the project.
Ms. Wallace asked if the development would have covered parking. If so, she
requested that covered parking include solar panels. Mr. Morris stated that the
development is tenant driven, thus the possibility of solar panels is not determined
until there is a tenant for the site.
Dan Rush stated that he is in favor of the development but has concerns with the
lack of affordable housing in the area. Mr. Rush asked staff to promote more
affordable housing projects. Mr. Morris stated that he understands the concern but
does not see residential as an appropriate use for the area due to the surrounding
industrial land uses.
MOTION – GPA-EST-2-21-7:
Lisa Perez motioned to recommend approval of GPA-EST-2-21-7 per the staff
recommendation. Dan Rush seconded the motion.
VOTE – GPA-EST-2-21-7:
7-0, motion to recommend approval passed; Members Ademolu, Cartwright, Perez,
Rush, Terrazas, Wallace and Cardenas, in favor.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 294
Attachment D
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
April 7, 2022
ITEM NO: 5
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:
Application #: GPA-EST-2-21-7 (Companion Case Z-79-21-7)
Location: Southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road
From: Commercial and Public/Quasi-Public
To: Industrial
Acreage: 19.88
Proposal: Industrial
Applicant: Merit Partners
Owner: Murphy School District No. 21
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Estrella 3/15/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 7-0.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee
recommendation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Perez made a MOTION to approve GPA-EST-2-21-7, per the
Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Perez
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Johnson
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map designation of Industrial would allow uses
such as warehousing, manufacturing, and processing, which are consistent in character
with the land uses in the surrounding area.
2. The companion rezoning case, Z-79-21-7, proposes an industrial use of the site that is
consistent in scale and character with land uses in the general are
3. The subject site is appropriate for industrial use at the corner of two arterial streets and
in close proximity to a freeway, serving as major transportation routes.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 295
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Southeast Corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road (Ordinance G-6985)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-79-21-
7 and rezone the site from C-3 (General Commercial) and R-3 (Multifamily Residence
District) to A-1 (Light Industrial District) to allow light industrial uses. This is a
companion case and must be heard following GPA-EST-2-21-7.
Summary
Current Zoning: R-3 (14.89 acres) and C-3 (4.99 acres)
Proposed Zoning: A-1
Acreage: 19.88 acres
Proposed Use: Light industrial
Owner: Murphy School District No. 21
Applicant: Merit Partners
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this case on March 15,
2022 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on April 7, 2022 and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation,
by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road.
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 2615 and 2675 W. Buckeye Road, and 1441 and 1515 S. 27th Ave.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 296
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-79-21-7) FROM C-3 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT) AND R-3 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO
A-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 19.88-acre property located at the southeast
corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road in a portion of Section 13, Township 1 North,
Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from
4.99 acres of “C-3” (General Commercial District) and 14.89 acres of “R-3” (Multifamily
Residence District), to “A-1” (Light Industrial District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
Page 297
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and building
elevations date stamped December 21, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations, and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2. The required landscape setbacks along 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road shall
be planted with minimum 50% 2-inch caliper and 50% 3-inch caliper size trees,
five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, and conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards for arterial
streets in the Estrella Village, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
3. A minimum 500-square-foot landscaped accent area shall be provided at/near
the southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road. The landscaped
accent area shall provide a visually unique character with drought-tolerant plant
materials providing seasonal interest and 75% live cover, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
4. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking area and achieve 25% shade at maturity, as approved by
Planning and Development Department.
5. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
6. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet or two 200-
square foot areas shall be provided on site. Each required pedestrian area shall
include a minimum of two pedestrian seating benches, constructed of quality
and durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using minimum 2-inch
caliper large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees and/or architectural shade, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
7. All perimeter walls visible from street right-of-way shall include material and/or
textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative
element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 298
8. The sidewalk along 27th Avenue shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 11-foot 6-inch wide landscape strip located between
the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide shade
to a minimum 75% at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75% live coverage at maturity.
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided
herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
9. The sidewalk along Buckeye Road shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 13-foot wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide shade
to a minimum 50% at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 50% live coverage at maturity.
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided
herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. A minimum of 25 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks dispersed throughout the site and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
11. The development shall retain the existing right-of-way, bus bay, and bus stop
pad along eastbound Buckeye Road east of 27th Avenue. The bus bay shall be
compliant with City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1256. The attached bus stop
pad shall be compliant with City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1261 with a
minimum depth of 10 feet.
Page 299
12. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad along
northbound 27th Avenue north of the Pima Street alignment. The bus stop pad
shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with a
minimum depth of 10 feet. The bus stop pad shall be spaced from the south
entry intersection according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258.
13. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50 feet of right-of-way and construct the
east side of 27th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
14. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50 feet of right-of-way and construct the
south side of Buckeye Road, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
15. Access along Buckeye Road shall be in compliance with the AASHTO
guidelines for roadway line of sight, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department.
16. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall include site access review in
compliance with spacing requirements established in the Street Planning and
Design Guidelines. The developer shall be responsible for constructing and
funding all off-site improvements as recommended by the approved TIS.
17. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.
20. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Page 300
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
21. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 11th day of May, 2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Page 301
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 302
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-79-21-7
A PARCEL BEING LOT 1, GARCIA ELEMENTARY AS RECORDED IN BOOK 576 OF
MAPS, PAGE 35, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, TOGETHER WITH
THE ADJACENT RIGHTS OF WAY OF 27TH AVENUE AND BUCKEYE ROAD
LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA & SALT RIVER MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13, FROM WHICH
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13, BEARS SOUTH 00
DEGREES 16 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2633.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF
660.10 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
1318.31 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
656.49 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
13;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF
1316.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 867,137 SQUARE FEET OR 19.907 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.
Page 303
Page 304
Attachment B
Staff Report Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
Estrella Village Planning Committee March 15, 2022
Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 7, 2022
Request From: C-3 (General Commercial) (4.99 acres)
and R-3 (Multifamily Residence District)
(14.89 acres)
Request To: A-1 (Light Industrial District) (19.88
acres)
Proposed Use: Light Industrial
Location: Southeast corner of 27th Avenue and
Buckeye Road
Owner: Murphy School District No. 21
Applicant: Merit Partners
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
Current: Commercial and Public/Quasi-
Public
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
Proposed (GPA-EST-2-21-7): Industrial
27th Avenue Arterial Street 33-foot east half street
Street Map Classification Width varies from 33-
Buckeye
Arterial Street foot to
Road
53-foot south half street
Page 305
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CLEAN NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Facilitate the
acquisition of vacant, underutilized and blighted parcels for appropriate
redevelopment, compatible with the adjacent neighborhood character and
adopted area plans.
The subject site is an underutilized property, containing only vacant structures
formerly used as educational facilities. The proposed redevelopment will allow two
new light industrial buildings on the site which will be compatible with the adjacent
neighborhood character and adopted area plans.
STENGTHEN OUR LOCAL ECONOMY CORE VALUE; MANUFACTURING/
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support the expansion of
industrial zoning in targeted industrial areas.
The proposal will expand industrial zoning to the subject site, which is at an
appropriate location for industrial development. This will provide job generating uses
that strengthen Phoenix’s industrial sector and add to a diverse set of employment
opportunities.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; COMPLETE STREETS;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: In order to balance a more sustainable transportation
system, development should be designed to include increased amenities for
transit, pedestrian and bicyclists such as shade, water, seating, bus shelters,
wider sidewalks, bike racks, pedestrian scale lighting and way-finding.
Located at the junction of two arterial streets, the proposal, as stipulated, will provide
elements for transit, pedestrians, and bicyclists in order to promote walking and
alternative transportation. These elements include shaded detached sidewalks along
public streets, bicycle parking located on site, dedication and construction of a bus
stop pad along northbound 27th Avenue, retention of the existing bus stop pad along
eastbound Buckeye Road, and a prominent pedestrian walkway linking the building
with the public sidewalks.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposal, as stipulated, will be required to provide shade along the adjacent
public sidewalks and amenity areas. This will help to encourage walking and to
mitigate the urban heat island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus cooling the
micro-climate around the project vicinity.
Page 306
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program: See Background Item No. 6.
Estrella Village Plan: See Background Item No. 7.
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 8.
Complete Streets Guidelines: See Background Item No. 9.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 10.
Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 11.
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use Zoning
Garcia Elementary School
On Site C-3 and R-3
(unused buildings)
North (across Buckeye Road) Auto parts store C-3 and A-2
Construction equipment
South A-2
supply
East Auto salvage yard A-1
Gas station, offices, truck
West (across 27th Avenue) parking, fire station and C-3 and A-1
vacant
A-1 (Light Industrial District)
Standards Requirements Met or Not Met
Minimum Building
Setbacks
Front (Buckeye Road) 25 feet 73 feet (Met)
Sides (East and west West: 25 feet West: 90 feet (Met)
property lines)
East: 0 feet East: 78 feet (Met)
Rear (South property 0 feet 60 feet (Met)
line)
Page 307
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
Minimum Landscaped
Setbacks
Front (Buckeye Road) 8 times the lot frontage, 20 feet (Met)
measured in square feet
Sides (East and west West: 8 times the lot frontage, West: 20 feet (Met)
property lines) measured in square feet
East: None required East: None (Met)
Rear (South property None required None (Met)
line)
Maximum Lot No maximum 32 percent (Met)
Coverage
Maximum Building 56 feet, up to 80 feet with use 47 feet (Met)
Height permit
Minimum Parking 1 parking space per 300 437 parking spaces (Met)
square feet of office and 1
parking space per 1.5
warehouse or production
workers.
300 parking spaces required
Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 19.88 acres located at the southeast corner of 27th
Avenue and Buckeye Road from C-3 (General Commercial District) and R-3
(Multifamily Residence District) to A-1 (Light Industrial District) for a new light
industrial development. The site contains unused former educational facilities.
In 1959, the site was annexed into the City of Phoenix from unincorporated
Maricopa County and zoned C-3 and R-3. In 2001, the site was subdivided as
part of the Garcia Elementary Subdivision. The site was formerly used by the
Murphy School District No. 21 as an elementary school, until it closed in 2018.
The site has remained unused since then.
Page 308
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
2. The surrounding area
contains a mix of
commercial and industrial
zoning districts, including
C-3 (General Commercial
District), A-1 (Light
Industrial District), and A-2
(Industrial District).
Surrounding land uses are
discussed in background
item 3 below.
Zoning Aerial Map, Source: Planning and Development
Department
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
3. The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Commercial
(approximately 4.99 acres) in the northern portion and Public/Quasi-Public
(approximately 14.89 acres) in the southern portion. A concurrent minor General
Plan Land Use Map amendment case, GPA-EST-2-21-7 proposes to change
the land use map designation to Industrial. North of the site, across Buckeye
Road is designated Commercial and contains commercial uses. East of the site
is designated Industrial and contains an auto salvage yard. South of the site is
designated Industrial and contains a construction equipment supply company.
West of the site, across 27th Avenue, is designated Commercial, Industrial, and
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre. These properties include a vacant
lot, a truck trailer storage lot, a general contractor’s yard, and a union office.
The requested A-1 zoning is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land
Use Map designation requested per GPA-EST-2-21-7 and compatible with
existing and future envisioned land uses in the area.
Page 309
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
General Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning and Development Department
PROPOSAL
4. Site Plan
The applicant is proposing two new light industrial buildings, totaling
approximately 253,000 square feet. Building A will be approximately 188,000
square feet in area with a height of 43 feet. Building B will be approximately
65,000 square feet in area with a height of 47 feet. The conceptual site plan
indicates vehicular access points located along 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road
with parking areas located in the front of the buildings and truck loading areas
behind the buildings, and a 20-foot landscaped setback along both street
frontages.
Staff is recommending general conformance to this site plan, per Stipulation No.
1, to ensure that the site develops as proposed. The proposed buildings are
oriented toward the street frontages, and truck parking and loading areas are
located in the rear of the buildings, screened from the public street. Lastly, the
large setback from Buckeye Road is appropriate and consistent with the Estrella
Village Character Plan.
Staff recommends 400 square feet of employee resting area that incorporates
seating and shade to allow site employees a place outdoors during their
workday. This area would be shaded a minimum of 75 percent using minimum
two-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees and/or architectural
shade. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 6.
Page 310
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
Conceptual Colored Site Plan, Source: Butler Design Group
5. Elevations
The conceptual building elevations depict architectural features that include
variation in colors and window sizes, particularly emphasizing the corners of
each building, in addition to four-sided architecture. Staff is recommending
general conformance to these building elevations per Stipulation No. 1.
Conceptual Building A Elevation, Source: Butler Design Group
Conceptual Building B Elevation, Source: Butler Design Group
Page 311
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
STUDIES AND POLICIES
6. Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program
The Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscape Program was adopted in 1999
and provides a landscape palette for arterial streets within the Estrella Village to
help establish the community’s character. In addition, the plan identifies specific
guidance for village parkways and gateway intersections in the community.
As a site fronting on two arterial streets, the subject site falls under the
guidelines for arterial streets. The plan contains guidelines for the amount of
landscaping and a tree and plant list for trees under power lines, trees not under
power lines, large shrubs, small shrubs/groundcover, and accent along arterial
streets. Staff recommends Stipulation No. 2 pertaining to landscaped setbacks
along 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road in order to maintain consistency with the
Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program. Additionally, Stipulation
Nos. 8 and 9 require that the landscaped strip between the sidewalk and back
of the curb comply with these standards.
7. Estrella Village Plan
The Estrella Village Plan was adopted in 1999 and outlines a vision for
improving the village through five main goals that include: orderly growth, an
identifiable village core, strong residential neighborhoods, variety of homes and
jobs, and consistent streetscapes and trail linkages. The proposed land use
map in the Estrella Village Plan identifies the subject site with the same land
use designations, Commercial and Public/Quasi-Public, as the General Plan.
Page 312
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
Estrella Village Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning and Development Department
Goal 5 of the Estrella Village Plan, “Urban Design”, Objective D “Street
Appearance” recommends that commercial and industrial properties along
major streets and adjoining residential neighborhoods should be well
landscaped with open storage and activity screened from view. To meet this
objective, staff is recommending landscaped setback standards, a landscaped
corner accent area, distinct architectural features for perimeter walls, and
landscaped areas between the sidewalk and the back of the curb (Stipulation
Nos. 2, 3, 7, 8, and 9).
8. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached
from the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to
provide thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island
effect. Staff is recommending several stipulations designed to provide trees and
enhance shade within the development as follows:
• Two-inch caliper trees planted in uncovered parking lots to provide 25
percent shade at maturity (Stipulation No. 4);
Page 313
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
• Two-inch caliper trees and/or architectural shade at an employee node to
provide 75 percent shade (Stipulation No. 6);
• Detached sidewalks along 27th Avenue, shaded to a minimum of 75
percent with minimum two-inch caliper trees (Stipulation No. 8); and
• Detached sidewalks along Buckeye Road, shaded to a minimum of 50
percent with minimum two-inch caliper trees (Stipulation No. 9).
9. Complete Streets Guidelines
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To provide a safe pedestrian
environment along Buckeye Road and 27th Avenue, staff is recommending
detached sidewalks shaded with trees on both sides, as well as enhanced
pavement treatment for the on-site pedestrian walkways that cross vehicular
drive aisles (Stipulation Nos. 5, 8, 9). Additionally, staff recommends Stipulation
No. 10 to provide bicycle parking and further promote alternative modes of
transportation at this location.
10. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-
term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. As stipulated, the project will provide bicycle parking spaces,
installed per the requirements in the city’s Walkable Urban (WU) Code. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 10.
11. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a
goal to become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050
Environmental Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this
is to improve and expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs.
Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to
encourage the provision of recycling containers for multifamily, commercial and
mixed-use developments meeting certain criteria. The proposed conceptual site
plan and application materials do not indicate whether recycled waste pickup
will be incorporated.
Page 314
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
12. From the time the case was filed to the time the staff report was written, no
community correspondence has been received on this case.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
13. The Public Transit Department provided comments pertaining to the bus stop
pads on adjacent streets and pedestrian pathways within the site. The existing
bus stop pad along Buckeye Road in front of the subject site should be retained
and compliant with City of Phoenix standards. Similarly, the developer should
dedicate right-of-way and construct a bus stop pad along 27th Avenue in front of
the subject site in compliance with City of Phoenix standards. Finally, the
pedestrian walkways, connecting the building entrances and the public
sidewalk, should be enhanced with distinct features from the surrounding
parking areas and drive aisles. These comments are addressed in Stipulation
Nos. 5, 11, and 12.
14. The Street Transportation Department noted that a 50-foot right-of-way
dedication is required, consistent with D-Section designation on the Street
Classification Map, for both Buckeye Road and 27th Avenue, a five-foot-wide
detached sidewalk is required along both Buckeye Road and 27th Avenue,
access along Buckeye Road shall be in compliance with roadway line of sight
guidelines, the developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis prior to
preliminary approval of plans, and that the streets be constructed with all
required improvements and comply with current ADA standards. These
comments are address in Stipulation Nos. 13 through 17.
15. The Aviation Department requires that the property owner record a Notice to
Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport in order to disclose the
existence, and operational characteristics of City of Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport (PHX) to future owners or tenants of the property.
Furthermore, that Form 7460-1 be filed for the development and that the
development receive a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA, if required.
These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 18 and 19.
16. The Water Services Department commented that the property has existing
water and sewer mains that can potentially serve the development. In addition,
the Water Services Department commented that capacity is a dynamic condition
that can change over time due to a variety of factors.
17. The Floodplain Management division of the Public Works Department did not
have any comments on this case.
Page 315
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
OTHER
18. The site has not been identified as being archeologically sensitive. However, in
the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery
and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and
allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation
No. 20.
19. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution
in Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required
by the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to
require the form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan
approval. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 21.
20. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements
such as obtaining a use permit to conduct the proposed outdoor use in this
zoning district. Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning
adjustments and abandonments, may be required.
Findings
1. The requested A-1 zoning district would allow uses such as warehousing,
manufacturing, and processing, which are consistent in character with the land
uses in the surrounding area.
2. The subject site is appropriate for industrial use at the corner of two arterial
streets and in close proximity to a freeway, serving as major transportation
routes.
3. The development, as stipulated, will improve connectivity in the immediate vicinity
of the subject site and incorporate design and landscaping features that enhance
the location, consistent with the Estrella Village Plan and Estrella Village Arterial
Street Landscaping Program.
Stipulations
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and building
elevations date stamped December 21, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations, and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 316
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
2. The required landscape setbacks along 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road shall be
planted with minimum 50% 2-inch caliper and 50% 3-inch caliper size trees, five
5-gallon shrubs per tree, and conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards for arterial
streets in the Estrella Village, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent
with a pedestrian environment.
3. A minimum 500-square-foot landscaped accent area shall be provided at/near the
southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road. The landscaped accent
area shall provide a visually unique character with drought-tolerant plant materials
providing seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
4. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch
caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout
the parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as approved by
Planning and Development Department.
5. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
6. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet or two 200-
square foot areas shall be provided on site. Each required pedestrian area shall
include a minimum of two pedestrian seating benches, constructed of quality and
durable materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using minimum 2-inch
caliper large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees and/or architectural shade, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
7. All perimeter walls visible from street right-of-way shall include material and/or
textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative
element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
8. The sidewalk along 27th Avenue shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 11-foot 6-inch wide landscape strip located between
the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 317
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide shade to a
minimum 75 percent at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75 percent live coverage at maturity.
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided
herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
9. The sidewalk along Buckeye Road shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 13-foot wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide shade to a
minimum 50 percent at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 50 percent live coverage at maturity.
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided
herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
10. A minimum of 25 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks dispersed throughout the site and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
11. The development shall retain the existing right-of-way, bus bay, and bus stop pad
along eastbound Buckeye Road east of 27th Avenue. The bus bay shall be
compliant with City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1256. The attached bus stop pad
shall be compliant with City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1261 with a minimum
depth of 10 feet.
Page 318
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
12. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad along
northbound 27th Avenue north of the Pima Street alignment. The bus stop pad
shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with a
minimum depth of 10 feet. The bus stop pad shall be spaced from the south entry
intersection according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258.
13. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50 feet of right-of-way and construct the
east side of 27th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
14. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50 feet of right-of-way and construct the
south side of Buckeye Road, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
15. Access along Buckeye Road shall be in compliance with the AASHTO guidelines
for roadway line of sight, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.
16. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall include site access review in
compliance with spacing requirements established in the Street Planning and
Design Guidelines. The developer shall be responsible for constructing and
funding all off-site improvements as recommended by the approved TIS.
17. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis
review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.
Page 319
Staff Report: Z-79-21-7
March 7, 2022
20. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
21. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.
Writer
Anthony Grande
March 7, 2022
Team Leader
Joshua Bednarek
Exhibits
Sketch Map
Aerial Map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped December 21, 2021 (1 page)
Conceptual Landscape Plans date stamped December 21, 2021 (2 pages)
Conceptual Building Elevations date stamped December 21, 2021 (4 pages)
Page 320
A-1* A-1*
Z-140-81
Z-306-82
R-3 Z-210-84
Z-63-86
R-3
C-3
Black Canyon/Maricopa
Freeway Specific Plan
A-1
R-3
R-3
R-3 A-2
C-3 mapservices@phoenix.gov
*
IMiles
VAN BUREN ST
I-10
BUCKEYE RD
0.065 0.0325 0 0.065
ESTRELLA VILLAGE LOWER BUCKEYE RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 BROADWAY RD
SOUTHERN AVE
Z-79-21
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Merit Partners
FROM:
C-3 ( 4.99 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO.
Z-79-21
DATE:
12/30/2021
REVISION DATES:
R-3 ( 14.89 a.c.)
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
19.88 Acres QS 8-23 F-7 TO: A-1 ( 19.88 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
C-3, R-3 72, 216 87, 259
A-1 N/A N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus Page 321
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-79-21.mxd
A-1* A-1*
Z-140-81
Z-306-82
R-3 Z-210-84
Z-63-86
R-3
C-3
Black Canyon/Maricopa
Freeway Specific Plan
A-1
R-3
R-3
R-3 A-2
C-3
*
IMiles
VAN BUREN ST
I-10
BUCKEYE RD
0.065 0.0325 0 0.065
ESTRELLA VILLAGE LOWER BUCKEYE RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 BROADWAY RD
SOUTHERN AVE
Z-79-21
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Merit Partners
FROM:
C-3 ( 4.99 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO.
Z-79-21
DATE:
12/30/2021
REVISION DATES:
R-3 ( 14.89 a.c.)
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
19.88 Acres QS 8-23 F-7 TO: A-1 ( 19.88 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
C-3, R-3 72, 216 87, 259
A-1 N/A N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus Page 322
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-79-21.mxd
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-79-21-7
Date of VPC Meeting March 15, 2022
Request From R-3 (Multifamily) (4.99) and C-3 (General Commercial)
(14.89)
Request To A-1 (Light Industrial) (19.88)
Proposed Use Light Industrial
Location Southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation in the staff
report
VPC Vote 7-0, motion passed; None in dissent.
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases GPA-EST-2-21-7 and Z-79-21-7 were heard concurrently.
No members of the public registered to speak on these items.
Anthony Grande, staff, introduced himself an provided a combined presentation for
companion cases GPA-EST-2-21-7 and Z-79-21-7. Mr. Grande discussed the
location of the site, noting surrounding land uses including industrial uses along 27th
Avenue and Buckeye Road. Mr. Grande discussed the existing General Plan Land
Use map designation of Industrial, the Estrella Village Plan, the Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program, and other policy documents including the
General Plan. The conceptual site plan and building elevations for the two proposed
industrial buildings was discussed. Mr. Grande concluded the presentation by
providing a staff recommendation of approval and describing the proposed
stipulations for case Z-79-21-7, as presented in the staff report.
Jason Morris, with Withey Morris PLC, introduced himself as the applicant and
discussed the location of the site, surrounding uses, and existing site conditions. Mr.
Morris discussed the history of industrial uses that exist in the area and discussed
how policy plans including the General Plan supported the requested Land Use Map
designation and A-1 zoning. Mr. Morris explained the different building materials plus
elements used in the building and proposed perimeter landscaping and concluded
the presentation by requesting approval of these two cases.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 330
Lisa Perez asked if the Fire Department had provided comments on the case. Mr.
Morris stated that he had received comments from the Fire Department but had
addressed these and that they did not have any further concerns.
Ms. Perez stated that she is in support of this use due to the buffering and
landscaping provided.
Parris Wallace asked for the project to include electric vehicle charging stations.
Ms. Perez supported this request. Mr. Morris stated that this will be discussed with
the developer of the project.
Ms. Wallace asked if the development would have covered parking. If so, she
requested that covered parking include solar panels. Mr. Morris stated that the
development is tenant driven, thus the possibility of solar panels is not determined
until there is a tenant for the site.
Dan Rush stated that he is in favor of the development but has concerns with the
lack of affordable housing in the area. Mr. Rush asked staff to promote more
affordable housing projects. Mr. Morris stated that he understands the concern but
does not see residential as an appropriate use for the area due to the surrounding
industrial land uses.
MOTION – Z-79-21-7:
Lisa Perez motioned to recommend approval of Z-79-21-7 per the staff
recommendation. Dan Rush seconded the motion.
VOTE – Z-79-21-7:
7-0, motion to recommend approval passed; Members Ademolu, Cartwright, Perez,
Rush, Terrazas, Wallace and Cardenas, in favor.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
At the March 15, 2022, Estrella Village Planning Committee meeting, Jason Morris,
applicant on case Z-79-21-7 stated that he would follow up with the developer regarding
the installation of electric vehicle charging stations and the covered parking with solar
panels on the site. No stipulation was added regarding these elements.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 331
Attachment D
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
April 7, 2022
ITEM NO: 6
DISTRICT NO.: 7
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-79-21-7 (Companion Case GPA-EST-2-21-7)
Location: Southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road
From: C-3 and R-3
To: A-1
Acreage: 19.88
Proposal: Light industrial
Applicant: Merit Partners
Owner: Murphy School District No. 21
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris, PLC
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Estrella 3/15/2022 Approval, per the staff recommendations. Vote: 7-0.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee
recommendation.
Motion Discussion: Commissioner Perez made a MOTION to approve Z-79-21-7, per the
Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Motion details: Commissioner Perez made a MOTION to approve Z-79-21-7, per the Estrella
Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Perez
Second: Mangum
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Johnson
Opposition Present: No
Findings:
1. The requested A-1 zoning district would allow uses such as warehousing,
manufacturing, and processing, which are consistent in character with the land uses in
the surrounding area.
2. The subject site is appropriate for industrial use at the corner of two arterial streets and
in close proximity to a freeway, serving as major transportation routes.
3. The development, as stipulated, will improve connectivity in the immediate vicinity of the
subject site and incorporate design and landscaping features that enhance the location,
consistent with the Estrella Village Plan and Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program.
Page 332
Stipulations:
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and building
elevations date stamped December 21, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations,
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2. The required landscape setbacks along 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road shall be
planted with minimum 50% 2-inch caliper and 50% 3-inch caliper size trees, five 5-
gallon shrubs per tree, and conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program landscape palette and landscaping standards for arterial streets in the Estrella
Village, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility
conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department
on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.
3. A minimum 500-square-foot landscaped accent area shall be provided at/near the
southeast corner of 27th Avenue and Buckeye Road. The landscaped accent area shall
provide a visually unique character with drought-tolerant plant materials providing
seasonal interest and 75% live cover, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
4. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch
caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the
parking area and achieve 25% shade at maturity, as approved by Planning and
Development Department.
5. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped, or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
6. One outdoor employee resting area of no less than 400 square feet, or two 200-square
foot areas shall be provided on site. Each required pedestrian area shall include a
minimum of two pedestrian seating benches, constructed of quality and durable
materials, and shaded to a minimum of 75% using minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy
drought-tolerant shade trees and/or architectural shade, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
7. All perimeter walls visible from street right-of-way shall include material and/or textural
differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element, such as
tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
8. The sidewalk along 27th Avenue shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and detached
with a minimum 11-foot 6-inch wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and
back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide shade to a
minimum 75% at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 75% live coverage at maturity.
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided herein,
shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program
requirements for arterial streets.
Page 333
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.
9. The sidewalk along Buckeye Road shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and detached
with a minimum 13-foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of
curb and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees that provide shade to a
minimum 50% at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation to achieve 50% live coverage at maturity.
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided herein,
shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program
requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.
10. A minimum of 25 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U and/or
artistic racks dispersed throughout the site and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
11. The development shall retain the existing right-of-way, bus bay, and bus stop pad along
eastbound Buckeye Road east of 27th Avenue. The bus bay shall be compliant with
with City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1261 with a minimum depth of 10 feet.
12. The developer shall dedicate right-of-way and construct one bus stop pad along
northbound 27th Avenue north of the Pima Street alignment. The bus stop pad shall be
constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with a minimum depth
of 10 feet. The bus stop pad shall be spaced from the south entry intersection according
to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258.
13. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50 feet of right-of-way and construct the east
side of 27th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
14. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50 feet of right-of-way and construct the south
side of Buckeye Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
15. Access along Buckeye Road shall be in compliance with the AASHTO guidelines for
roadway line of sight, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.
16. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is
reviewed and approved by the City. The TIS shall include site access review in
compliance with spacing requirements established in the Street Planning and Design
Guidelines. The developer shall be responsible for constructing and funding all off-site
improvements as recommended by the approved TIS.
Page 334
17. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed development
from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis review process,
prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
19. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and operational
characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or tenants of the
property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the templates
and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
20. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the developer
shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius of the
discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology Office to
properly assess the materials.
21. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file
for record.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Les Scott at 602-376-3981, Les.scott@phoenix.gov or TTY: Use 7-1-1.
Page 335
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Certificate of Appropriateness - Appeal of Historic Preservation Commission's
Decision on Certificate of Appropriateness Application HPCA 2100392 - 2215 N.
9th St. in the Coronado Historic District
Request to hold a public hearing on a Certificate of Appropriateness Decision by the
Historic Preservation (HP) Commission on Certificate of Appropriateness
Application HPCA 2100392 for 2215 N. 9th St. in the Coronado Historic District for a
request to build two attached dwelling units, one two-story and the other single-story,
on the 134 feet by 50 feet vacant parcel. Requested City Council action is to uphold,
reverse or modify the HP Commission’s Certificate of Appropriateness decision.
Summary
On Jan. 11, 2022, the HP Hearing Officer held a public hearing to review this
application, which was filed by Michael Gilson of Accurate Estimating on behalf of the
property owner, LG Properties Plus, LLC. The application at that time was for the
construction of two, two-story dwelling units connected by a one-story carport with a
total of 2,835 square feet under roof. The hearing officer approved the Certificate of
Appropriateness subject to the following stipulations:
1. That any proposed gate or fencing over 3 feet in height be stepped back 3 feet
from the front corners of the primary dwelling;
2. That window headers be changed to sills; and
3. That the parapet have a varied roofline - increases above existing roofline to be
minimal in height and width subject to approval of Historic Preservation staff.
The Hearing Officer’s decision was appealed on Jan. 14, 2022 by five appellants:
Carol Simmons, Cody Castelletti, Donna Reiner, Arthur Vigil III, and Heidi D'Angelo.
After meeting with the appellants, the applicant revised the proposed plans to reduce
the height of the rear dwelling unit to one-story and change the roof form of the front
dwelling. The proposed modifications were supported by staff.
The appeal was heard before the HP Commission on Feb. 14, 2022 and was
continued to the March 21, 2022 HP Commission meeting to allow for the applicant to
meet with the appellants and compile additional information to demonstrate the
Page 336
compatibility of the proposed plans with the surrounding neighborhood.
Subsequent to the Feb. 14, 2022 HP Commission meeting, two of the appellants
provided design suggestions to the applicant. The applicant modified the roof form and
style of the dwelling and reduced the total square footage under roof to 2,697. The
proposed modifications were supported by Historic Preservation staff.
At the March hearing, the HP Commission voted 6-1 to modify the Hearing Officer's
decision to approve the current revised plan set (dated March 14, 2022). The HP
Commission's decision was appealed on March 25, 2022 by four appellants: Carol
Simmons, Donna Reiner, Arthur Vigil III, and Heidi D'Angelo.
Staff finds that the proposed work meets the Standards for Consideration of
Appropriateness set forth in Section 812.D of the Zoning Ordinance. While the
neighboring properties are single-story, the historic building which was previously
located on the parcel was a two-story dwelling. The former building was roughly 23
feet in height and the proposed front dwelling would be roughly 26 feet at its tallest
point. That peak ridge height is stepped back roughly 24 feet from the westernmost
portion of the front facade which itself is stepped back 25 feet from the front property
line. The westernmost portion of the dwelling has a roof height of 23 feet matching the
no longer extant historic dwelling. The adjacent single-story historic buildings are set
back 21 feet and 19 feet from the front property lines. This proposed design serves to
meet the guideline for new construction which states that "where changes in size must
occur, the visual impact of the new construction should be minimized by stepping back
the new construction from the historic buildings." Staff also recognizes that the
applicant reduced the height of the rear unit to be one-story and modified the overall
footprint in order to reduce the size and massing of the dwelling. Design changes were
also made, based on response to the appellants, to alter the roof form, windows, front
door opening, and front porch, as the Historic Preservation Guidelines note, to
"resemble those related forms found on adjacent or surrounding structures."
Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the HP Commission's March 21, 2022
decision to approve the most recent plan submitted by the applicant to the Historic
Preservation Office on March 14, 2022.
Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the city.
Concurrence/Previous Action
· The HP Hearing Officer approved the Certificate of Appropriateness on Jan. 11,
2022 with three stipulations.
Page 337
· The Hearing Officer's decision was appealed on Jan. 14, 2022 by five appellants:
Carol Simmons, Cody Castelletti, Donna Reiner, Arthur Vigil III, and Heidi D'Angelo.
· The HP Commission voted 6-1 to modify the hearing officer's decision on March 21,
2022 to approve the plan set submitted by the applicant in March of 2022.
· The HP Commission's decision was appealed on March 25, 2022 by four
appellants: Carol Simmons, Donna Reiner, Arthur Vigil III, and Heidi D'Angelo.
Location
2215 N. 9th St.
Council District: 4
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.
Page 338
ATTACHMENT A
STAFF REPORT
To: City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Commission
From: Helana Ruter, Historic Preservation Planner II
Subject: Appeal of Hearing Officer’s Decision – Application No. HPCA 2100392
2215 N 9th Street, Coronado Historic District
This is a report to request the Historic Preservation Commission modify the decision of the
Historic Preservation Hearing Officer to approve Certificate of Appropriateness Application No.
HPCA 2100392, subject to a revised plan submitted by the applicant on March 14, 2022.
Background
The original application was to allow the construction of two, two-story dwelling units connected
by a single-story carport with a total 2,835 sf footprint under roof at the subject property. The
hearing was held on January 11, 2022.
The Hearing Officer, Janet Reed, approved the application subject to three stipulations:
1. Any proposed gate or fencing over 3’ in height be stepped back 3’ from the front corners
of the primary dwelling;
2. Change window headers to sills; and
3. Parapet to have a varied roofline – increases above existing roofline to be minimal in
height and width subject to approval of Historic Preservation staff.
The Hearing Officer’s decision was appealed on January 14, 2022, by five appellants including:
Carol Simmons, Cody Castelletti, Donna Reiner, Arthur Vigil III, and Heidi D’Angelo.
Subsequent to the filing of the appeals, there was additional discussion between the applicant
and appellants that resulted in a new version of the plan, received by staff on February 7, 2022.
The changes, which included a reduction in height of the rear dwelling unit to one-story, were
supported by staff.
The appeal was heard by the Historic Preservation Commission on February 14, 2022, and
continued to the March 21, 2022, HPC meeting.
Subsequent to the February 14, 2022, HPC meeting, there were continued discussions between
the applicant and appellants which resulted in a further modified proposal submitted on March
14, 2022. Staff is in support of the revised proposal.
Page 339
Recommendation
Staff supports the proposed changes made in the March 14th submittal.
Attachments: Appeal Forms and appellant letter (7 pages)
Staff Report (8 pages)
Hearing Plans (10 pages)
Phoenix Historic Neighborhoods Coalition letter (3 pages)
Plan submittal from February 7, 2022 (7 pages)
Plan submittal from March 14, 2022 (8 pages)
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
PHOENIX HISTORIC PRESERVATION HEARING OFFICER
Staff Report
Certificate of Appropriateness
2215 North 9th Street
Case No. HPCA 2100392
January 11, 2022
Background
This is a Certificate of Appropriateness application to construct two, two-story dwelling units at the
subject property. The property is zoned R-3 HP (multi-family residential with historic preservation
overlay). It is also within the boundaries of the Coronado Neighborhood Special Planning District (SPD). The
application was filed by Michael Gilson of Accurate Estimating on behalf of owner LG Properties Plus, LLC.
Previous Applications
The following applications have been reviewed by the HP Office since the property received historic
designation in 1986:
Application No. Application Type Scope of Work Date Approved
HPDE 1600401 Demolition Approval Total demolition Denied – October
16, 2016
HPCA 1700130 Certificate of Two-story addition Withdrawn
Appropriateness
HPCA 1700521 Certificate of Infill – two-story residence and April 26, 2018
Appropriateness detached garage with second
story living unit
HPDE 1800461 Demolition Approval Total demolition September 13,
Property Description
The subject property consists of a 134 ft by 50 ft vacant parcel located within the Coronado Historic
District. The ca. 1925 house on the property was declared an imminent hazard by the City of Phoenix
Building Official in September of 2021 and was subsequently demolished. Please refer to the street view
photos, inventory form and aerial of the parcel.
Proposed Work
The applicant proposes to construct two, two-story dwelling units connected by a single-story carport.
The footprint of the dwelling, with carport, would be 2,835 square feet. The front dwelling would have a
footprint under roof of approximately 1622 sf with the rear unit approximately 760 sf attached through a
single-story carport. The total lot coverage of the proposed project would be 43%.
The first story of the front facade of the primary dwelling would incorporate a shed roof with a recessed
5’10” x 16’11” front porch area. The front façade would be set back 25’ from the front property line. The
historic dwelling (demolished) was set back 20’ from the front property line. The front setbacks along the
Page 348
HPCA 2100392, 2215 N 9th Street
east side of 9th Street generally range from 18’ to 21’. The home immediately to the north (2217 N 9th
Street) has a setback of approximately 21’ and the home to the north of that (2223 N 9th Street) has a
setback of approximately 22’ from the property line. The home immediately to the south of the subject
property (2209 N 9th Street) has a setback 19’ from the property line.
The proposed primary dwelling would be two-story with a flat roof and parapet with a height of 22’7
3/8” above finished floor. The ridge height of the demolished dwelling, above finished floor, was 22’8”.
The first-floor ceiling would be 9’ in height with the second story ceiling at 8’ in height. The rear dwelling
would have a parapet height of approximately 22’ with the first and second floor ceiling heights at 8’.
The home immediately to the north (2217 N 9th Street) has a ridge height of 12’ with the ridge height of
the home to its north (2223 N 9th Street) at 13’. The home immediately to the south (2209 N 9th Street)
has a ridge height of 18’. The height of the parapet for the single-story carport – stretching between the
two buildings – would be 12’5 3/8”.
The shed roof, along the first story front façade of the primary dwelling, would be red barrel tile with the
recessed front porch section supported by 2-6”x6” wood posts. Similarly, wood-framed awnings above
the windows on the second story of the front façade would be covered with red barrel tile. The windows
would be vinyl in a combination of double hung and sliding operating systems. The windows would be
recessed 2 inches from the wall with exterior wood headers.
A 6’ tall concrete block fence would be constructed along the northern and southern property lines. A 6’
tall wrought iron gate would extend from the front (southwest) corner of the dwelling to the block fence
and provide auto access to the interior carport. Additionally, approximately 42’ of 6’ tall wrought iron
fence/gate would be located along the rear (eastern) property line to provide access to uncovered
parking at the rear of the second dwelling.
Findings
The City of Phoenix’s “General Design Guidelines for Historic Properties”
(https://www.phoenix.gov/pddsite/Documents/pdd_hp_pdf_00035.pdf) recommend compatible new
construction within historic districts:
Similar Scale New Construction
x Within the historic residential areas, new construction should be similar in height, shape and
materials to the historic structures in its vicinity. Where changes in size must occur, the visual
impact of the new construction should be minimized by stepping back the new construction
from the historic buildings.
x Building features, such as roof lines, window and door openings, porches, entrances, pergolas,
porte-cocheres or carports should resemble those related forms found on adjacent or
surrounding historic strictures.
The demolished building on the property was unique in that it was the only primary two-story dwelling
on 9th Street between Monte Vista Road and Oak Street (three, two-story dwellings exist as alley
houses). A new primary two-story dwelling on the site would inherently create a building that is taller
than the historic structures in the immediate vicinity. However, the proposed building would incorporate
a flat roof so as not to exceed the height of the former historic dwelling and disrupt precedent.
The R-3 zoning and the Coronado Neighborhood SPD require a 25’ front yard setback for new
construction on vacant lots. This would set the new construction back from the front facades of the
adjacent historic properties. Additionally, the proposed design of the primary dwelling incorporates a
Page 349
HPCA 2100392, 2215 N 9th Street
roughly 5’ deep single-story portion along the front façade with a recessed porch. This single-story
segment would further step the two-story height back from the adjacent single-story historic dwellings.
In order to reduce the overall massing of the two units, under one roof, an interior, single-story carport
was incorporated into the site plan. The second unit would also have a modest reduction in height from
the primary unit.
While the historic homes along this section of 9th Street are primarily Bungalow, Vernacular, or Ranch-
style, Spanish Colonial Revival is characterized by the Coronado Neighborhood SPD as one of the four
most common architectural styles in the Coronado Historic District. The proposed flat roofs of the
dwelling units serve to reduce the overall proposed height, while the stucco walls and additions of the
red barrel tile first story roof and awnings add characteristics of Spanish Colonial design. The recessed
double-hung windows resemble forms on surrounding structures with the lack of sills and modern
materials defining new construction.
Recommendation
Based on the findings above, staff recommends approval of this application with the following stipulation:
1. Any proposed gate or fencing over 3’ in height be stepped back 3’ from the front corners of the
primary dwelling.
Subject to this stipulation the application is consistent with the Standards for Consideration of a
Certificate of Appropriateness as set forth in Section 812.D of the Zoning Ordinance.
Helana Ruter
Historic Preservation Planner
Attachments: Photos, inventory form and aerial
Page 350
HPCA 2100392, 2215 N 9th Street.
Historic dwelling (from google street view, facing east) demolished 2021
Now vacant lot, facing east
Page 351
HPCA 2100392, 2215 N 9th Street.
Adjacent property to south, view facing southeast
Adjacent properties to north, view facing northeast
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Planning and Development
±
1 inch = 37 feet
Disclaimer : The information provided on this map is based on record drawings submitted by others.
0 15 30 60 Feet Date: 1/7/2022
Users of this information are cautioned that independent verification of actual conditions may be necessary. P rinting Water Data is for Internal Staff Only
Page 355
4
4 0 0 :;
'J 4 4 C
9 C 9 C
99 4
K 9 J 'J 4 C
9JGA
8
K 0
8 !"#$%& '
J
8 ()*+,+-+./ 0
.1
0@A
:;8 CK8KK
&AJ AJ CK8KK84 84 @48 2./+/3 '
AJ
: ;
AJ 4 '
J 9
$-#"+51+./ 0
' A 8
'A'J
J $#1+./.6/-7+5 !/3$'' '
:9 A ;
%$,!1+./'
A''J
/$%!>$"K6+*$CK1>5$3>5-(<-7$!17+/3!55%+$*5!"!%%$%1.?
6..*-1(*-K.A#A6+17'CK3!%,!/+L$*"..=+/3/!+%-K.A#A!1,$"1+#!%M.+/1-!/*&K
J
8 .A#A!1+/1$"<$*+!1$-1(*-!/*1.5!/*).11.<5%!1$-AI.+/1-.=3>5-(<-7$!17+/3
J )$%$=1(/1"$!1$*A?1$"+."#%!**+/31.)$!11!#7$*17".(37-7$!17+/31.-1(*-A
@2
4 8 /$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*@6!1$" "$-+-1!/13>5-(<)!#N+/3
).!"*@."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*5!"!%%$%."!1"+371!/3%$-1.-1(*-6+17*#.!1$* /1$"/!1+./!%(+%*+/3.*$:;
C4 J
/!+%-@&CK%./3@AK-7!/N@CK7$!*-@&K.A#A: ;
/1$"/!1+./!% $-+*$/1+!%.*$: ;
0 :9 A ;
!-$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.6..*"..=1"(--$-K /1$"/!1+./!%4$#7!/+#!%.*$:4;
.A#A6+17CK>5$ ."*">6!%%-#"$6-K.A#A9!#$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<
6!%%).!"*."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.1"(--$-6+17&CK>5$ ."
*">6!%%-#"$6-K.A#A!1M.+/1-!/*+/1$"<$*+!1$1"(--$-!/*CK>5$*">6!%%
/1$"/!1+./!%%(<)+/3.*$:;
-#"$6-K.A#A5%!#$*K)!#N./$+17$"-+*$.=$/*M.+/1-AI.+/1-.==-$1K=".<)!-$
/+=."<%(<)+/3.*$:;
J
&&
0 0
J
%!>$"M.+/1-A ..*1"(--$--(55."1+/3CK6..*-1"(#1("!%5!/$%-!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-
1.1"(--$-6+17*/!+%-A55".5"+!1$"..=#.,$"+/3A
/1$"/!1+./!%9($%!-.*$:9;
/1$"/!1+./!%/$"3>./-$",!1+./.*$:;
9 A 9 49
4 : ; /1$"/!1+./!%?+-1+/3(+%*+/3.*$:;
0 8 /1$"/!1+./!%6+<<+/3..%!/*5!.*$:;
& !1+./!%%$#1"+#!%.*$: ;
A9 99 4 9 4
J
4%$,!1.".*$-
J 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
AJ
0 8
9 4@
0
4 0 0 9
K 9 J 8
4
4
DKDJ A 9 4 9
9 4 8
9
JK 4 9 9 8A0 8
80 99
4 8 9B
0 @ 4 0 994
9 8 8 8 89 8
4
9
4 9 4 9A
&&
4 C
0 0 984
4 A9 8 @
9 99 4 4 4 @
8 9 4 9
0 @'F9 @ 98
' 9 A
@ @
8
8 4
4
4 :; 0@A
4 0 'J 8 A
9 8 4 8
'
: 4 8;
4
4 4 A9A
4
0 9 @F9
@&F9
0 9 @F9
&F9 &F9
0
8C : ; F9 F9
'F9
'F9
F9 F9
0 8
8
09 F9
0 9 &'F9
@'F9 4
8C : ; 'F9 'F9
F9
0
F9
4 D
0D @'F9
0 8@
0D 'F9 8
&
A9A 9D @'A9A
'
D @&A9A E 9 0 D 'E
E 9 0 D4E 8
9 8
8 A 48
8
84
4 0
C 4
0 48 4
9 A9 DA
4A 9 @A4A4 A '
9 4 9 @ G
4 @ 'G @
0 F H
9 I A CC 9
4 42
Page 356
J K&J K
F9
9 F9
F9
0 '
DCKDJ
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
9 9
$!*$" $!*$"
J AK
J AK J A&K J A'K
J K J ''CK J K
Page 357
J 'CK J K 'CK J K
J K J K 'J 'K
C9
0
DCKDJ
J 'CK J K 'CK J K J CKCK
J K J K 'J 'K
:4 ;
J K J ''CK J K J 'CK
9 9 $!*$" $!*$"
+37$-1 +*3$
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
J AK J A&K
J AK
J AK
J A'K
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
9
J J
&AJ
J J J J
AJ 9 J
J A'J
AJ
A&&J AJ
AJ J A'J
A&J
J
'J
9
J
J&'C
'J
8
J DKDJ
Page 358
8 J
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9 '
4
0@A
0
0
Page 359
C
C
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
4 8
J9
'J9
'J
Page 360
A
A
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
J CK
J CK
J &CK J CK J CK J CK J 'CK J CK
J &CK 'CK
'J
4
' 4
J K'J K
F9
8 0 &J KJ K
&J &K'J K F9
0@A
J &CK 'F9 4 C
& &J &KJ K
F9
J KJ K
4 F9
J KJ K 948 4
'F9 J KJ K C
F9
' A 8
J K'J 'K
J K
F9
J &CK
J J
@2
& 99 J CK
J KJ K
'F9
J KJ K 8
J KJ K
&&
J KJ K
F9 F9 F9
&C
J 'CK
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
948
J K'J K
'F9
4I 4
J &KJ 'K 8
%$,!1+./' F9
0
J KJ 'K
J 'F9 J
'4 &F9
J KJ K
9
F9
'J &K&J K
&F9 J
J 4
&& 9
8
0
J KJ K
'F9 '
@ @
8
J KJ K
'CK 'CK
J F9 &J 'CK 4
0@A
'J CK J &'CK
J 'CK
A
4 8
9 9 DCKDJ& C
'J 'CK J 'CK &J 'CK J CK J CK J CK J CK
J CK J &CK
'CK CK CK
J &CK J &CK J ''CK
J CK
'J 'J 'J 'J J CK 'J J K 'J J CK 'J
J CK
J 'CK
9 9
&J CK
&J &KJ K J KJ K
9 4 9 ' F9 F9
J CK
K K
4 9 4 9 '
J K
J KJ K
'J F9
'CK
4 4
J KJ K J KJ K
F F9 &J &KJ K &F9 F
J
F9 9 4 9 ' 0
DCKDJ DCKDJ
'J KJ K
'J &F9
4
J &KJ K J KJ K
&F9 F9
J 'CK
'J
F 9 4
80
DCKDJ
J CK
'J K'J K
&F9
J KJ K
J CK
9 4 9 ' 'F9
J CK
'
9 4
8 J KJ &K
'J CK
F9
9
'CK
J 9 4
J KJ K
'F9
DCKDJ
J CK
&
J CK
%$,!1+./' 8
J KJ &K
& &
J KJ K J 'J K'J K 'J 9 4
F9 &F9 F9
CK 08
J K'J 'K
'J &K'J 'K 99 4 4
F9 J KJ K
F9 &J KJ 'K F9 9 4
'CK
&F9
'J
9 4 CK
&CK
J &CK
J KJ K 0
J 'CK
J CK
8 4 'F9
4
J KJ K J KJ K J KJ K
J 'CK
&F9 F9 F9
'J 4 F
J KJ K
F9 DCKDJ
'J CK
' K4 CK
J 'CK
J K'J 'K
9
J K
&F9
J KJ K K4 CK
F9
9
K49
CC 9
J &CK
J 'CK J CK 'J '&CK J CK 'J &CK CK CK K4 C
J 'CK 'J 'J 'J 'J J K 'J
'J CK J CK J K J CK 'J 'CK J CK J CK J CK J K
Page 361
4
0@A
' A 8
!" " !"# " " $ $
% % " " "# " % " $ $
" " "# " " $ $
% # " &" "#&&" #$ ##%"'( %" $) $
) %" &" "#&&" # ##&"'( %" $) $ @2
" &" "#& " % ##)"'( " $ $
! % % " &" "#& " % ##"'( " $ $
" &" "#& " ##%"'( $ $
&&
& ) ) # " " "#" #$ ##%"'( %" $) $
% % # " &" "#&&" #$ ##"'( %" $) $
# " &" "#& " ##%"'( $ $
" &" "#& " % ##)"'( " $ $
" " "# " % ##)"'( " $ $
% # " " "# " #$ ##%"'( %" $) $ 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
) # " &" "#&&" #$ ##%"'( %" $) $
% " " "# " % ##)"'( " $ $
! " " %"# " % ##!"'( " $ $
% ) % " " "# " % ##"'( " $ $
& " " "# " ##%"'( $ $
" " "# " % ##)"'( " $ $
&" " & "# " % ##"'( " $ $
" " %"# " % ##!"'( " $ $
% % % " " "# " % ##"'( " $ $ 9
) % % % " &" )"#& " %$ % # #)"'( " $ $
) ) # " &" "#& " # #)"'( $ $ 4
! # " &" %"#&&" #$ ##!"'( %" $) $
&& 9
# %" &" "#&&" #$# ##&"'( %" $) $
) ) " " "#" ##%"'( $) $ @ @
%% %% % " )" )"#) " # #)"'( $) $
" " "# " ##%"'( $) $ 8
% % % " % " "#)" ##%"'( $) $ 4
) ) & ) " " "#" ##%"'( $) $
0@A
% % " " "# " ##%"'( $) $
! %" %" "#" ##&"'( $) $
% % " % " "#)" ##%"'( $) $ A
& " %" "#" ##%"'( $) $
4 8
0
4
4 8 9
9 '
4 8
0 8
K
4 9
9
&
CC 9
Page 362
C
J CK
J &CK J CK J CK J CK J 'CK J CK
J &CK 'CK
'J
4
&
&
)
J &CK !
0@A
C
4 9
84
' A 8
&
J K
4
9
J &CK
K9 4 9 4 '
CK 8 4 8
9 &
'
K AA
@2
98
:; !
4
J CK %
C84
'CKAA J
'C %
K
9 :4 ; 9
9 'C
* GKAA 84 &
&&
&CK
84
& )
'J &CK
J 'CK
)
C
4
K'
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
CK %
K
9
K A
:;
9
9 4
9
J
J
4
9
8
&&
%
9
@ @
'CK 'CK
J &J 'CK 8
4
'J CK J &'CK
0@A
C
J 'CK
9 9 9 4
&J CK
9 DCKDJ A
4 8
'J 'CK J 'CK &J 'CK J CK J CK J CK J CK
J CK J &CK
'CK CK CK
J &CK J &CK J ''CK
J CK
'J 'J 'J 'J J CK 'J J K 'J J CK 'J
) ) ) ) ) )
J CK
J 'CK
# #
&J CK
J K J CK
'J )
'CK
&
)
'J )
'9
J 'CK
%&* 'J
!
"
J CK
' # # $$
J CK
! % $$
J CK
% )
& $&
&
' !
'J CK
!
(
) ( &
$
'CK
$
!
J CK
J CK
! ! 'J
CK
&
'CK
&
'J
)
)
&CK
J &CK
J 'CK
J CK
&
J 'CK
'J
)
'J CK
J
J 'CK J K
) ) )
) ) )
J &CK
J 'CK J CK 'J '&CK J CK 'J &CK CK CK
J 'CK 'J 'J 'J 'J J K 'J
CC 9
'J CK J CK J K J CK 'J 'CK J CK J CK J CK J K
&J CK
9 9 DCKDJ
Page 363
4
9 4 9 '
J&'C
9 J 9 4 9 ' 9
J K
9
J K
0@A
9C
+37$-1 +*3$
J CK
J K
9 J AK
9
9 &
9 J'C
' A 8
$!*$"
&J A&K
4
&
@2
9
J 'CK
J CK
J &'CK
9C
J K
'J CK
4 8
&&
K K 9 &
9
9 J'C
4 $!*$"
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
J AK
J 'CK
J 'CK J CK
J CK J K
JK
9 9 9
J AK
4
&& 9
C0 DCKDJ
@ @
8
4
0@A
A
4 8
J 'CK &CK
9 4 9 4 CKDJ
J&'C 9
CK
9 J A'K
J 'CK
J 'CK
K J 'CK
J 'CK
K
B&'C +37$-1 +*3$ +37$-1 +*3$
9
J AK J AK
%!>
J 'CK
J 'CK
K
9 & 9 9J
J 'CK
J CK
'J K 'J K
+37$-1 +*3$
.
J CK
J AK
&
$!*$" $!*$"
$!*$" J AK J AK
K 4 8 9 &J A&K
J CK J CK
'
J CK J K
J &'CK
J K J K
J K J 'CK
CK
J CK
J &'CK
K CK
J CK K
CK
J CK K
9 9JC
J K
J K
"
J
$!*$" $!*$" J CK $!*$"
K J AK J AK J AK
J CK
J CK J K J K &J CK J K J K
J K J 'K J &K J K J K KK
4 &
4 4 9 9 K 9 9
94 & J AK J AK
K 9 9 9
K J AK
9 89 4 8
C0 DCKDJ
9 C 0 DCKDJ
CC 9
Page 364
4
0@A
' A 8
J&'C 9
@2
9 J
J CK
J K
9 9
K 9 +37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
J K
9
J A&K
&&
J CK
J K
J &CK
$!*$"
&J A&K 4 $!*$"
4 J A&K
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
8 9
J K J K
'
J K J K
9
%!>
J CK
.
J CK
CK
J CK K
&
J J
K ''CK
+37$-1 +*3$ +37$-1 +*3$
J A'K J A'K
'J 'CK
K9
J K
K9 9 9J'C
J J 'CK
9
J K
$!*$" & 4 99
K9
J AK 4 &
9 4 $!*$"
4
J AK
9
&&
J K
4
J K J K
J K J K
9 9 9 9
@ @
J AK J AK K
8
4
0@A
0 DCKDJ A
4 8
J CK
J CK
K K AA
J CK
J CK
K9 K AA
' 04'
' '
(+%1 /4+#".6!,$1!/*!"*
J K
'K
.(/*.%%!"* ' ' '
:0 ';DCKDJ
CC 9
Page 365
4
:;
'I 4 4 C
9 C 9 C
99 4
9IEA
J 9 I 8
J 0
8 !"#$%& '
I
8 ()*+,+-+./ 0
.1
0@A
:;8 CJ8JJ
&AI AI CJ8JJ84
: ;
84 @48
2./+/3 '
4 '
9
$-#"+51+./ 0
' A 8
'A'I
I $#1+./.6/-7+5 !/3$'' '
:9 A ;
AI
/$%!>$"J6+*$CJ1>5$3>5-(<-7$!17+/3!55%+$*5!"!%%$%1.?
6..*-1(*-J.A#A6+17'CJ3!%,!/+K$*"..=+/3/!+%-J.A#A!1,$"1+#!%L.+/1-!/*&J
I
8 .A#A!1+/1$"<$*+!1$-1(*-!/*1.5!/*).11.<5%!1$-AH.+/1-.=3>5-(<-7$!17+/3
I )$%$=1(/1"$!1$*A?1$"+."#%!**+/31.)$!11!#7$*17".(37-7$!17+/31.-1(*-A
@2
4 8 /$%!>$"CJ1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*@6!1$" "$-+-1!/13>5-(<)!#M+/3
).!"*@."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*5!"!%%$%."!1"+371!/3%$-1.-1(*-6+17*#.!1$* /1$"/!1+./!%(+%*+/3.*$:;
C4 I
/!+%-@&CJ%./3@AJ-7!/M@CJ7$!*-@&J.A#A: ;
/1$"/!1+./!% $-+*$/1+!%.*$: ;
0 :9 A ;
!-$%!>$"CJ1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.6..*"..=1"(--$-J /1$"/!1+./!%4$#7!/+#!%.*$:4;
.A#A6+17CJ>5$ ."*">6!%%-#"$6-J.A#A9!#$%!>$"CJ1>5$3>5-(<
6!%%).!"*."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.1"(--$-6+17&CJ>5$ ."
*">6!%%-#"$6-J.A#A!1L.+/1-!/*+/1$"<$*+!1$1"(--$-!/*CJ>5$*">6!%%
/1$"/!1+./!%%(<)+/3.*$:;
-#"$6-J.A#A5%!#$*J)!#M./$+17$"-+*$.=$/*L.+/1-AH.+/1-.==-$1J=".<)!-$
/+=."<%(<)+/3.*$:;
I
&&
0 0 %!>$"L.+/1-A ..*1"(--$--(55."1+/3CJ6..*-1"(#1("!%5!/$%-!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-
1.1"(--$-6+17*/!+%-A55".5"+!1$"..=#.,$"+/3A
/1$"/!1+./!%9($%!-.*$:9;
/1$"/!1+./!%/$"3>./-$",!1+./.*$:;
9 A 9 49
4 : ; /1$"/!1+./!%?+-1+/3(+%*+/3.*$:;
0 8 /1$"/!1+./!%6+<<+/3..%!/*5!.*$:;
0 8 & !1+./!%%$#1"+#!%.*$: ;
A9 99 4 9 4
I
4%$,!1.".*$-
4"$<.*$%<+M$E.(1%..MA#.<
AI
0 8 9 4@
0
9
J 9 I 8
4
4
DJDI A 9 4 9
9 4 8
9
IJ 4 9 9 8A0 8
80 99
4 8 9B
0 @ 4 0 994
9 8 8 8 89 8
4
9
4 9 4 9A
&&
9 99 4 C
0 0 984
4 0 @& A9 8 @
F9
4 4 4 @
8 9 4 9
@ 98
' 9 A
@ @
8
8 4
4
4 :; 0@A
4 0 'I 8 A
9 8 4 8
'
: 4 8;
4
4
0
0 8
8
4
0
0 8@
8
&
'
8
9 8
8 A 48
8
84
4 0
C 4
0 48 4
9 A9 DA
4A 9 @A4A4 A '
9 4 9 @ E
4 @ 'E @
0 F G
9 H A C&C 9
4 42
Page 366
I J&I J
F9
9 F9
F9
0 '
DCJDI
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
9 9
$!*$" $!*$"
I AJ
I AJ I A&J I A'J
I J I ''CJ I J
Page 367
I 'CJ I J 'CJ I J
I J I J 'I 'J
C9
0
DCJDI
I 'CJ I J 'CJ I J I CJCJ
I J I J 'I 'J
:4 ;
I J I ''CJ I J I 'CJ
9 9 $!*$" $!*$"
+37$-1 +*3$
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
I AJ I A&J
I AJ
I AJ
I A'J
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
C&C
0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+M$E.(1%..MA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
9
I I
&AI
I I I I
AI 9 I
A'I
AI
A&&I AI
AI I A'I
A&I
I
'I
9
I
'I
8
I DJDI
Page 368
8 I
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
C&C
0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+M$E.(1%..MA#.<
4 8 9
9 '
4
0@A
0
Page 369
C
C
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
C&C
0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+M$E.(1%..MA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
I CJ
I CJ
I &CJ I CJ I CJ I CJ 'I CJ
I &CJ 'CJ
'I
4
' & 4
I J'I J
F9
8 0 &I &JI J
&I &J'I J 'F9
0@A
I &CJ 'F9 4 C
&
I JI J
F9
'I 'JI J
I JI J F9
4 F9
I JI J 948 4
''F9 I JI J C 4
F9 I JI J
' A 8
F9
I J '
'I CJ
I I
@2
'I 'J'I 'J
'F9
& 99 I CJ
I JI J
&F9
I JI J 8
I JI J 4
&&
F9 F9 I JI J
F9
&C
8
0
I 'CJ I JI 'J
'F9
4"$<.*$%<+M$E.(1%..MA#.<
948
I JI J I J'I J
'F9 F9
4H 4
I &JI 'J
F9
I I
'4 &F9
I JI J
9
&F9
' '
'I &J&I J
F9 I
I 4
&& 9
8
0
I JI J
'F9 '
@ @
8
I JI J
F9 &I 'CJ 4
0@A
'I CJ I &'CJ
I 'CJ
A
4 8
9 9 DCJDI
'I 'CJ I 'CJ &I 'CJ I &J
I CJ I &CJ
'CJ CJ CJ
I &CJ I 'CJ
'I 'I 'I 'I I CJ 'I
' ' ' '
I 'CJ
9 4 9 '
J J
4 9 4 9 '
I J
I JI J
'I ' F9
'CJ
4 4
I JI J I JI J
F F9 &I &JI J F9 I
F9 9 4 9 ' 0
DCJDI '&I JI &J
'I ' &F9
F 9 4
80
DCJDI
I CJ
'I J'I J
&F9
I CJ
' 9 4
8 I JI &J
'I CJ
F9
9
I JI J
I 9 4
'F9
DCJDI
I CJ
&
I 9 4
&CJI &CJ CJ
08
I J'I 'J
F9 'I &J'I 'J
F9 9 4
'
9 4 CJ
I CJ
0
8 4 4
I JI J I JI J I JI J
I 'CJ
&F9 F9 F9
' 'I 4
&I JI J
'F9
' J4 CJ
I &CJ
9
I CJ
I JI J J4 CJ
F9
9
J49
' ' C&C 9
' '
I &CJ
I 'CJ I CJ 'I '&CJ I CJ J4 C
'I CJ 'I 'I 'I
'I CJ
I 'CJ I CJ I J I CJ
Page 370
&''.&"$$"+&"-
)"' *&"$
-
!
$%'$;'
)"'
$ ")$&%$
0#&1
,*$&+
)$,;&9
-$)&&)$""0$&'."
"))&&)$"
)"'
+-&0".'&1*9$&09$0
)$8
".''#"$$/ '.))$ #0##" $" *&"$-
/-"&0 $
'$-
, *$&+
$+&85425<=4>!244<?45
"& *'7#&
,)"
0$-0&"$8
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
0$-$8
+'&$-
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
"0$$$%&"'&$( (
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
&)&;0-;&0
)'".$&$"$))$"1
&''.&"$$"+&"-
$%'$;'."
).'&$0'.0$0&
'".'"'"&'"&
+&"$&')1-"
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
"$
*&'23 !
4564)6
! 7.8.0.
'"&'"
*&"$-
")'$-
")#&
#0#&00
"+1'"*&
#
&+-+)$ (
")"$
'$-
"*""+
*$&+
"& *'7#&
-))$"$).'
)'*$&+, ".''$/ $#
,)" #&+&&*&"$# /
-"&0 ""
$,&'"#.-"$'$&0-&"$*1$'$'+)&1
)$,
$&$&"$$%&"'&$( (
)$/
"#$"$$%&"'&$( (
0&"$)&-$
::::::::::
Page 371
!
)"'
".''$/ $#
#&+&&*&"$# #0#&00
"+$#
#&+
/-"&0
1'"*&
".$
#
"$+)
,
".''
'.+
".$
Page 372
'$-
)&&)$"
&+
."0$$$%&"'&$( (
".$
&+
,$0-$ "$
*&'23
4564)6
7.8.0.
-))$"$).' ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
'"&'" &)&;0-;&0 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 0#&1
"" )'".$&$"$))$"1 0$-$8
&''.&"$$"+&"- +'&$- )$,;&9
)$, $%'$;'." )$8
)$/ ).'&$0'.0$0&
'".'"'"&'"& 0$-0&"$8 $+&85425<=4>!244<?45
+&"$&')1-"
0&"$)&-$
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: &''.&"$$"+&"-
::::::::::
$%'$;'
4
:;
'J 4 4 C
9 C 9 C
99 4
9JGA
K 9 J 8
K 0
8 !"#$%& '
J
8 ()*+,+-+./ 0
.1
0@A
8
:;8 CK8KK
&AJ CK8KK84
: ;
84 @48
2./+/3 '
4 '
9
$-#"+51+./ 0
' A 8
'A'J
J $#1+./.6/-7+5 !/3$'' '
:9 A ;
A''J
/$%!>$"K6+*$CK1>5$3>5-(<-7$!17+/3!55%+$*5!"!%%$%1.?
6..*-1(*-K.A#A6+17'CK3!%,!/+L$*"..=+/3/!+%-K.A#A!1,$"1+#!%M.+/1-!/*&K
J
8 .A#A!1+/1$"<$*+!1$-1(*-!/*1.5!/*).11.<5%!1$-AI.+/1-.=3>5-(<-7$!17+/3
J )$%$=1(/1"$!1$*A?1$"+."#%!**+/31.)$!11!#7$*17".(37-7$!17+/31.-1(*-A
@2
4 8 /$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*@6!1$" "$-+-1!/13>5-(<)!#N+/3
).!"*@."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*5!"!%%$%."!1"+371!/3%$-1.-1(*-6+17*#.!1$* /1$"/!1+./!%(+%*+/3.*$:;
C4 J
/!+%-@&CK%./3@AK-7!/N@CK7$!*-@&K.A#A: ;
/1$"/!1+./!% $-+*$/1+!%.*$: ;
0 :9 A ;
!-$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<6!%%).!"*!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.6..*"..=1"(--$-K /1$"/!1+./!%4$#7!/+#!%.*$:4;
.A#A6+17CK>5$ ."*">6!%%-#"$6-K.A#A9!#$%!>$"CK1>5$3>5-(<
6!%%).!"*."3>5-(<,$/$$")!-$!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-1.1"(--$-6+17&CK>5$ ."
*">6!%%-#"$6-K.A#A!1M.+/1-!/*+/1$"<$*+!1$1"(--$-!/*CK>5$*">6!%%
/1$"/!1+./!%%(<)+/3.*$:;
-#"$6-K.A#A5%!#$*K)!#N./$+17$"-+*$.=$/*M.+/1-AI.+/1-.==-$1K=".<)!-$
/+=."<%(<)+/3.*$:;
J
&&
0 0 %!>$"M.+/1-A ..*1"(--$--(55."1+/3CK6..*-1"(#1("!%5!/$%-!55%+$*!1"+371!/3%$-
1.1"(--$-6+17*/!+%-A55".5"+!1$"..=#.,$"+/3A
/1$"/!1+./!%9($%!-.*$:9;
/1$"/!1+./!%/$"3>./-$",!1+./.*$:;
9 A 9 49
4 : ; /1$"/!1+./!%?+-1+/3(+%*+/3.*$:;
0 8 /1$"/!1+./!%6+<<+/3..%!/*5!.*$:;
0 8 & !1+./!%%$#1"+#!%.*$: ;
A9 99 4 9 4
J
4%$,!1.".*$-
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
AJ
0 8 9 4@
0
9
K 9 J 8
4
4
DKDJ A 9 4 9
9 4 8
9
JK 4 9 9 8A0 8
80 99
4 8 9B
0 @ 4 0 994
9 8 8 8 89 8
4
9
4 9 4 9A
&&
9 99 4 C
0 0 984
4 0 @& A9 8 @
F9
4 4 4 @
8 9 4 9
@ 98
' 9 A
@ @
8
8 4
4
4 :; 0@A
4 0 'J 8 A
9 8 4 8
'
: 4 8;
4
4 4 A9A 4
0 9 @'F9
'@&&&F9
0 9 @F9
0
8C : ; F9 F9
0 8
&F9 &F9
8
0 8@
&F9
&F9 8
4 D '
0D '@&&&F9
&
0D 'F9
A9A 9D A&A9A
D @&A9A E 9 0 D AE
8 84
E 9 0 D4E
9 8
8 A 48
4
8
4 0
C 4
0 48
9 A9 DA
4A 9 @A4A4 A '
9 4 9 @ G
4 @ 'G @
0 F H
9 I A 'CC 9
4 42
Page 373
J K&J K
F9
9 F9
F9
0 '
DCKDJ
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
9 9
$!*$" $!*$"
J AK
J AK J A&K J A'K
J K J ''CK J K
Page 374
J 'CK J K 'CK J K
J K J K 'J 'K
J 'CK
C9
0
DCKDJ
J 'CK J K 'CK J K J CKCK
J K J K 'J 'K
:4 ;
J K J ''CK J K J 'CK
9 9 $!*$" $!*$"
+37$-1 +*3$
+37$-1 .(37$+%+/3
J AK J A&K
J AK
J AK
J A'K
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
'CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
9
J J
&AJ
J J J J
AJ 9 J
A'J
AJ
A&&J AJ
AJ J A'J
A&J
J
'J
9
J
'J
8
J DKDJ
Page 375
8 J
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
'CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9 '
4
0@A
0
Page 376
C
C
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
'CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
4 8
J9
'J9
'J
Page 377
A
A
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
'CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
J CK
J CK
J &CK J CK J CK J CK 'J CK
J &CK 'CK
'J
4
J ' & 4
J K'J K
F9
8 0 &J &KJ K
&J &K'J K 'F9
0@A
J &CK 'F9 4 C
&
J KJ K
F9
'J 'KJ K
J KJ K F9
4 F9
J KJ K 948 4
''F9 J KJ K C 4
F9 J KJ K
' A 8
F9
J K '
'J CK
J J
@2
'J 'K'J 'K
'F9
& 99 J CK
J KJ K
&F9
8
J KJ K 4
' &&
F9 J KJ K
F9
&CK
8
0
'J &CK
J 'CK J KJ 'K
''F9
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
948
J KJ K J K'J K
'F9 F9
4I 4
J &KJ 'K
F9
J J
'4 &F9
J KJ K
9
&F9
' '
'J &K&J K
F9 J
J 4
&& 9
8
0
J KJ K
'F9 '
@ @
8
J KJ K
F9 &J 'CK 4
0@A
'J CK J &'CK
J 'CK
A
4 8
9 9 DCKDJ
'J 'CK J 'CK &J 'CK J CK
J CK J &CK
'CK CK CK
J &CK J 'CK
'J 'J 'J 'J J CK 'J
' ' ' ' K
4 9
9
9 4 9 '
K K
4 9 4 9 '
J K J K
J KJ K
F9
'J KJ K 4 4
''F9 J KJ K J KJ K
F F9 &J &KJ K F9 J
F9 9 4 9 '
DCKDJ
F 9 4
80
'J K'J K DCKDJ
&F9
J &CK 9 4
'
8 J KJ 'K
'J CK
F9
9
J KJ K
J 9 4
'F9
DCKDJ
J 'CK
&
J 9 4
&CKJ &CK CK
08
J K'J 'K
F9 'J &K'J 'K
F9 9 4
'
9 4 CK
J CK
0
8 4 4
J KJ K J KJ K J KJ K
J 'CK
&F9 F9 F9
' 'J 4
&J KJ K
'F9
' K4 CK
J &CK
9
J CK
J KJ K K4 CK
F9
9
K49
' ' 'CC 9
' '
J &CK
J 'CK J CK 'J '&CK J CK K4 C
'J CK 'J 'J 'J
J 'CK J CK J K J CK 'J CK
Page 378
4
C +37$-1 +*3$
9 & J A&K
&J CK
0@A
9C
90J'
' A 8
$!*$"
&J A&K
4
@2
J 'CK
9
J 'CK
4 8 2 2
&&
K
J ''CK
9 &
$!*$"
4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
'J CK
J AK
&
J CK
9
JK J CK J K
9 9 9 9 9
J AK
4
&& 9
C0 DCKDJ
@ @
8
4
0@A
9 04 4 49
A
4 8
+37$-1 +*3$
9 J A&K
+37$-1 +*3$ %!>
J CK
J A&K .
J 'CK
J 'K
&
9 9J
J 'K
&J CK
9 &
'CK
9
J 'CK
&J CK
$!*$" KA J 'K $!*$"
&J CK
J CK
&J AK 4 8 9
&J AK
'
J CK J CK
9 4 9 4 CKDJ
J CK
J K CK
J CK
K
J CK
J CK
J K
J 'CK J 'CK
CK
J CK CK
J CK
K
J
J 'CK
& $!*$" $!*$"
J
4 & J AK J AK
'J CK
J K
9 $!*$"
J AK
$!*$"
J AK
J K J K J K J K
J K J K KK
J K J K
9 K K 9 9
K 8 AK J AK
9 9 K K 9 9 'CK
J AK K J A
9 89 4 8
C0 DCKDJ
9 C 0 DCKDJ
&
'CC 9
Page 379
K CK
J CK J 'CK
J K J J K J 'K
9 9
+37$-1 +*3$
$!*$"
$!*$"
J AK
J AK &J A&K J A&K
J K J 'CK &J CK
J K
J CK
'C
&
4 &
K9
4
4
9 8 9
'
4
0
K9
4
Page 380
J K
DCKDJ
9
%!>
.
&
J CK
'J CK
J K
9 9 $!*$"
J AK
J AK
' A 8
@ @
8
4 4 @2
'CC 0@A && &&
A 9 4"$<.*$%<+N$G.(1%..NA#.<
4 8 9
9
4
0@A
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
MARCH 2 AND APRIL 6, 2022) - Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption -
Rezoning Application Z-70-21-5 - Approximately 500 Feet South of the Southeast
Corner of 75th Avenue and Camelback Road (Ordinance G-6966)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) to R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) to
allow multifamily residential.
Summary
Current Zoning: R1-6
Proposed Zoning: R-3A
Acreage: 6.50
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential
Owner: Sheri Ranger, Ranger Homes
Applicant: Daryn Murphy, Commonwealth Development
Representative: Rod Jarvis, Earl and Curley, PC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on Jan. 12,
2022, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 9-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Feb. 3, 2022, and
recommended approval, per the Maryvale Village Planning Committee
recommendation, with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 8-0.
Location
Approximately 500 feet south of the southeast corner of 75th Avenue and Camelback
Road
Council District: 5
Parcel Addresses: 4705 and 4735 N. 75th Ave.
Page 381
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 382
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-70-21-5) FROM R1-6 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO R-3A (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 6.50-acre site located approximately 500
feet south of the southeast corner of 75th Avenue and Camelback Road in a portion
of Section 24, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in
Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “R1-6” (Single-Family Residence District) to “R-
3A” (Multifamily Residence District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B.”
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following
Page 383
stipulations, violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of
the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped December 14, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations and
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, pop-outs, recesses, variation in
window size and location, pitched roofs and/or overhang canopies, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
3. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to 75th Avenue and the Grand Canal
shall contain a minimum of 25 percent brick, masonry, stone or another exterior
accent material to provide a decorative and aesthetic treatment, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
4. The south landscape setback shall be planted with minimum 3-inch caliper
trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
5. Resident bicycle parking shall be provided at a rate of 0.25 spaces per dwelling
unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. These spaces shall be located near building
entrances or common areas and may be provided through a combination of
inverted U-bicycle racks, artistic style racks, “Secure/Covered Facilities” or
“Outdoor/Covered Facilities” as defined in Appendix K or the Comprehensive
Bicycle Master Plan.
6. The developer shall replenish the existing landscape area within the 75th
Avenue right-of-way with minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy shade trees
placed minimum 20-feet on center and near the sidewalk to provide thermal
comfort for pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
7. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
8. The developer shall dedicate 70 feet of right-of-way along the east side of 75th
Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
9. The developer shall construct a minimum of two 8-foot-wide shaded pedestrian
pathways constructed of decorative material such as brick, pavers or
Page 384
alternative material providing access to the Grand Canal Trail, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
10. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
11. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
12. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 2nd day of March,
2022.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
Page 385
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_____________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (3 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 386
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-70-21-5:
PARCEL NO. 1:
THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT 40 FEET EAST AND 33 FEET SOUTH OF THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 40 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 532.90 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE EAST 508.25 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID SECTION 24, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
THE GRAND CANAL;
THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID GRAND CANAL 217.31 FEET TO A POINT;
THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH SECTION LINE, A DISTANCE OF
656.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF 75TH AVENUE, SAID POINT
BEING 40 FEET EAST AND 1877 FEET NORTH OF THE WEST QUARTER
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24;
THENCE NORTH 160.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE, TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF.
PARCEL NO. 2:
THE NORTH HALF OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT 70 FEET EAST AND 33 SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 70 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 532.90 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET POINT;
Page 387
THENCE EAST 452.96 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE
OF SECTION 24 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE
GRAND CANAL;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GRAND
CANAL TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED IN JOINT TENANCY WARRANTY
DEED RECORDED AS DOCKET 6900, PAGE 365;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE
OF 502.96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL NO. 3:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A POINT 70.00 FEET EAST AND 33.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24;
THENCE SOUTH, ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 70.00 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 692.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE EAST 656.25 FEET, ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID SECTION 24, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
THE GRAND CANAL;
THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, 237.68 FEET
ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE GRAND CANAL;
THENCE WEST, 817.92 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF 75TH
AVENUE, SAID POINT BEING 70.00 FEET EAST AND 1702.00 FEET NORTH OF
THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 24;
THENCE NORTH 175.00 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING. PARCEL NO. 4:
THE SOUTH HALF OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT 70 FEET EAST AND 33 SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST;
Page 388
THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 70 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 532.90 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET POINT;
THENCE EAST 452.96 FEET ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE
OF SECTION 24 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE
GRAND CANAL;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE GRAND
CANAL TO A POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY
CONVEYED IN JOINT TENANCY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AS DOCKET
6900, PAGE 365;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE
OF 502.96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Page 389
Page 390
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
To: Alan Stephenson Date: March 30, 2022
Deputy City Manager
From: Joshua Bednarek �e
Planning and Deve,opment Deputy Director
Subject: CONTINUANCE OF ITEM 83 ON THE APRIL 6, 2022 FORMAL AGENDA -
ORDINANCE ADOPTION - REZONING APPLICATION - Z-70-21-5 -
LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF 75TH AVENUE AND CAMELBACK ROAD (ORDINANCE G-6966)
Item 83 is a request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map
of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-70-21-5 and rezone the site
from R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) to R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) for a
Multifamily Residential and consider adoption of the Planning Commission recommendation
on February 3, 2022.
The applicant requested the item be continued to the May 11, 2022 Formal Meeting so they
can work with neighbors to address their concerns about the request. This item will be
advertised and posted for a public hearing.
Staff concurs with this request for continuance.
Approved:
Alan Stephenson, De uty City Manager
Attachment:
Exhibit A - Applicant's request for continuance
Page 391
Page 392
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
101 item(s)