Meeting Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee-9/8/2021 complete
2021-09-08 · Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee
Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee
Item text
Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of May 6, 2020, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.
The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 9
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.
Page 10
ATTACHMENT A
To: City Council Date: September 8, 2021
From: Mayor Kate Gallego
Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES
The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:
Human Relations Commission
I recommend the following for appointment as Chair:
Nate Rhoton
Mr. Rhoton is the Executive Director of One n Ten and will serve as Chair of the
commission for a term to expire September 8, 2022.
I recommend the following for appointment:
Claudia Kaercher
Ms. Kaercher is the President of Island Liaison, Inc. and a resident of District 8. She fills
a vacancy for a term to expire June 30, 2023.
Henry Lam
Mr. Lam is the Program Management Lead at USAA Federal Savings Bank and a
resident of District 7. He fills a vacancy for a term to expire June 30, 2023.
Michael Mazzocco
Mr. Mazzocco is the Vice Chair of the Greater Phoenix Equality Chamber of Commerce
and a resident of District 4. He replaces Jeremy Helfgot for a term to expire June 30,
2023.
Sal Bretts
Mr. Bretts is the Managing Director of BrightFi and a resident of District 4. He fills a
vacancy for a term to expire June 30, 2023.
Page 11
Anthony King
Mr. King is a Partner at Snell & Wilmer LLP and a resident of District 5. He fills a
vacancy to expire June 30, 2023.
Neighborhood Block Watch Fund Oversight Committee
I recommend the following for appointment:
Darlene Vallo
Darlene Vallo is a Desert Horizon Director on the Phoenix Block Watch Advisory Board.
She replaces Vickie Jaquez as the Phoenix Block Watch Advisory Board representative
for a partial term to expire August 31, 2022.
Phoenix Youth and Education Commission
I recommend the following for appointment:
Carol Lippert
Ms. Lippert is the Associate Vice President at Grand Canyon University. She replaces
Tacy Ashby for a term to expire August 31, 2022.
Richard Ramos
Mr. Ramos is the Executive Director of Innovation and Learning at Roosevelt School
District No. 66. He replaces Nedda Shafir for a term to expire August 31, 2022.
I recommend the following for reappointment:
Michael Andrews
Mr. Andrews will serve his second term to expire August 31, 2022.
Zane Balian
Mr. Balian is a youth commissioner. He will serve his second term to expire August 31,
2022.
Jeanine Bashir
Ms. Bashir will serve her sixth term to expire August 31, 2022.
Tracey Beal
Ms. Beal will serve her sixth term to expire August 31, 2022.
Jennifer Cruz
Ms. Cruz will serve her second term to expire August 31, 2022.
Page 12
Larry De Respino
Mr. De Respino will serve his first full term to expire August 31, 2022.
Lauren Eckstein
Ms. Eckstein is a youth commissioner. She will serve her third term to expire August 31,
2022.
Dana Naimark
Ms. Naimark will serve her first full term to expire August 31, 2022.
Martin Perez
Mr. Perez will serve his sixth term to expire August 31, 2022.
Katie Ritchie
Ms. Ritchie is a youth commissioner. She will serve her second term to expire August
31, 2022.
Rene Rosales
Mr. Rosales will serve his first full term to expire August 31, 2022.
Joe Roselle
Mr. Roselle will serve his second term to expire will serve August 31, 2022.
Larry Sandigo
Mr. Sandigo will serve his fifth term to expire August 31, 2022.
Bryan Smith
Mr. Smith will serve his first full term to expire August 31, 2022.
Ryan Young
Mr. Young is a youth commissioner. He will serve his second term to expire August 31,
2022.
Phoenix Women’s Commission
I recommend the following for appointment as Chair:
Allison Otu
Ms. Otu is the Executive Director of Corporate and Community Relations at University
of Arizona Health Sciences. She will serve as Chair for a term to expire September 8,
2022.
Tourism and Hospitality Advisory Board
Page 13
I recommend the following for appointment:
Ron Price
Mr. Price is the CEO of Visit Phoenix. He replaces Steve Moore for a partial term to
expire September 30, 2022.
Councilwoman Yassamin Ansari recommends the following for appointment:
Tracey Stoltz
Ms. Stoltz is the General Manager at Renaissance Phoenix Downtown. She fills a
vacancy for a term to expire September 30, 2023.
Page 14
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 154858.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Carmody, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
4163 W. Thunderbird Road
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application was Sept. 7, 2021. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 15
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We are U.S. citizens and residents of the state of Arizona. We currently hold a valid
LLC under AMC Entertaimen and also have a current transaction privilege tax license,
21402496. Our application with the State of Arizona has been turned in completed
along with background checks and fingerprint cards. We have already been issued a
interm liquor license. Andrea Carmody is also current on management title 4 training
and food handlers card. We are currently are insured as well. We also have 39 years
experiance in the industry.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We will continue follow all laws in accordance with the Class 12 liquor licenseing. We
have already obatined insurance through Southwest Bonding and Insurance. Our
insurance includes general liability, liquor liabilty and workers compensation. We will
keep our insurance current at all times.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - DaddyO's Grill
Liquor License Map - DaddyO's Grill
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 16
Liquor License Data: DADDYO'S GRILL
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 1 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 0
Liquor Store 9 3 0
Restaurant 12 6 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 50.61 53.60
Violent Crimes 8.58 7.82 7.32
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 52
Total Violations 89 81
Page 17
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1042021 1471 85 % 2% 7%
1042023 1420 88 % 18 % 4%
1042121 1193 15 % 0% 17 %
1042123 1683 79 % 0% 10 %
1042124 2501 80 % 3% 5%
1042181 1368 85 % 8% 6%
1042191 1602 85 % 0% 13 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 18
Liquor License Map: DADDYO'S GRILL
4163 W THUNDERBIRD RD
Ü
Date: 7/13/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 19
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 155221.
Summary
Applicant
Dustin Westby, Agent
License Type
Series 3 - Microbrewery
Location
1950 W. Rose Garden Lane, Ste. 130
Zoning Classification: PUD
Council District: 1
This request is for a new liquor license for a microbrewery. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently being remodeled with plans to open in October 2021.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 13, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 20
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“As a Arizonan native, I'm proud to live here with my wife and 3 kids. I've been apart of
AZ's craft beer scene since it's infancy and have watched it grow into one of the most
respected in the Country. The opportunity to join the ranks of some of the best, while
pursuing my goal of owing and operating a brewing, is a dream come true. I have
completed the AZ Title 4 Basic and Management certification. I will follow all AZ liquor
laws and will ensure proper training of managers and staff of the same certification.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The North Phoenix Deer Valley area is known for its airport and suburban
neighborhood. However, over the last few years, Deer Valley is evolving into a beer
destination for local AZ breweries. We are thrilled to join this community and eager to
teach and share our love of craft beer. Lake Pleasant Brewing aims to be a venue that
will be a melting pot for all lovers of locally brewed beer. A place where people can
share their love of beer with each other, gather to recoup from the stresses of life's
challenges, and celebrate life's accomplishments.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Lake Pleasant Brewing Company LLC
Liquor License Map - Lake Pleasant Brewing Company LLC
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 21
Liquor License Data: LAKE PLEASANT BREWING
COMPANY LLC
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Producer 1 1 0
Bar 6 2 0
Liquor Store 9 1 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 1
Restaurant 12 3 3
Craft Distiller 18 1 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 50.74 47.66
Violent Crimes 8.58 6.68 4.03
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 80
Total Violations 89 135
Page 22
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
6147001 287 86 % 29 % 31 %
6147002 1049 17 % 20 % 26 %
6147003 1517 33 % 14 % 14 %
6148001 1328 27 % 17 % 21 %
6148002 1944 69 % 0% 7%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 23
Liquor License Map: LAKE PLEASANT BREWING COMPANY LLC
1950 W ROSE GARDEN LN
Ü
Date: 8/2/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 24
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 155471.
Summary
Applicant
Kim Kwiatkowski, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
15262 N. Tatum Blvd.
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 2
This request is for a new liquor license for a liquor store. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business is
currently under construction with plans to open in January 2022.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 18, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
Page 25
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Circle K requires all store personnel to attend an in-house training program. This
training is designed to provide a safe and positive customer service environment. As
part of the Circle K training program, we provide an Alcohol Training Program that
meets the requirements of the Arizona Department of Liquor License Control.
Employees must pass a test on Techniques of Alcohol Management that becomes part
of their employee file. Store managers are required to attend additional in-house
manager training and obtain certification from the Arizona Department of Liquor
License Control. This certification requires submission of fingerprints and includes a
background investigation.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It is Circle K's objective to provide a product, accessible in a convenient manner that
meets the need of the surrounding community. Circle K's success depends on us
being able to provide products that are in demand.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Circle K Store #9184
Liquor License Map - Circle K Store #9184
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 26
Liquor License Data: CIRCLE K STORE #9184
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Liquor Store 9 3 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 4 2
Restaurant 12 11 3
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 29.88 33.43
Violent Crimes 8.58 2.14 2.65
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 51
Total Violations 89 60
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1032111 1273 95 % 6% 9%
1032112 1945 90 % 10 % 2%
1032123 1092 97 % 13 % 7%
1032152 1418 91 % 18 % 4%
1032162 1982 84 % 0% 4%
1032163 1647 68 % 5% 2%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 27
Liquor License Map: CIRCLE K STORE #9184
15262 N TATUM BLVD
Ü
Date: 7/22/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 28
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 155207.
Summary
Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
15215 N. Kierland Blvd., Ste. 190
Zoning Classification: C-2 M-R PCD
Council District: 2
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 13, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 29
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We train all of our employees in responsible liquor service. We also conduct regular
audits to ensure the comply.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“At The BUZZ our mission is 'to inspire goodness; good food, good people & good
times'. Whether you eat in, enjoy our street-side patio, order takeaway or have us
cater your event or occasion.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - The Buzz Eatery & Treats
Liquor License Map - The Buzz Eatery & Treats
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 30
Liquor License Data: THE BUZZ EATERY & TREATS
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 1
Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1
Liquor Store 9 3 0
Beer and Wine Store 10 7 1
Restaurant 12 26 14
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 14.27 21.76
Violent Crimes 8.58 0.74 1.16
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 2
Total Violations 89 3
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1032191 834 44 % 30 % 13 %
1032202 513 51 % 32 % 4%
1032203 1161 0% 16 % 7%
2168161 1812 95 % 0% 4%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 31
Liquor License Map: THE BUZZ EATERY & TREATS
15215 N KIERLAND BLVD
Ü
Date: 7/21/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 32
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.
Summary
Applicant
Julie Peterson
Location
4701 N. Central Ave.
Council District: 4
Function
Dinner
Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Oct. 23, 2021 - 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. / 500 attendees
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 33
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070480.
Summary
Applicant
Skala Hashim, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
2002 W. Camelback Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4
This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a liquor
store. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.
The 60-day limit for processing this application was Sept. 4, 2021. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
Page 34
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am familiar with retail sales and in particular, liquor store sales because I have
worked with father who has managed this store for a number of years. When the
owner who hired my father died, I took the opportunity to buy into the business as an
owner. Since the former owner was the Agent, I chose to become the agent. I know the
family well and will work with the surviving spouse and trustee of the trust that owns
the business with me.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 35
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 154962.
Summary
Applicant
Michael Gau, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
2322 E. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently being remodeled with plans to open in October 2021.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 10, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 36
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Wandering Tortoise (Series 7)
2417 E. Indian School Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 9
Liquor license violations: In April 2018, a fine of $750 was paid for failure to request ID
from an underage buyer and for selling, giving or furnishing an underage person with
alcohol.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been in the restaurant and hospitality business for 25+ years and I realize the
responsibility that comes along with owning a liquor license. I understand that it is a
great privilege and not a right to be granted a license. I am knowledgeable and
certified of the Arizona liquor laws and will do my very best to up hold them. This will
be my second license in Arizona.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I am excited about opening another fun business on the corner of 24th St. and Indian
School. I look forward to adding another quality business to the corner and
neighborhood that people will hopefully come to enjoy for many years to come I hope
to be another pillar of the community!!”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - 2322
Liquor License Map - 2322
Page 37
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 38
Liquor License Data: 2322
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 1 1
Bar 6 6 4
Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 1
Liquor Store 9 5 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 11 2
Hotel 11 2 0
Restaurant 12 21 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 100.69 93.52
Violent Crimes 8.58 15.57 12.10
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 50
Total Violations 89 77
Page 39
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1084003 1071 34 % 8% 40 %
1084004 1641 65 % 7% 19 %
1084005 422 16 % 37 % 13 %
1085012 1416 74 % 21 % 4%
1085021 743 50 % 29 % 20 %
1085022 732 23 % 28 % 12 %
1085023 1475 42 % 20 % 7%
1107021 1972 58 % 0% 30 %
1108011 1736 56 % 27 % 40 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 40
Liquor License Map: 2322
2322 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD
Ü
Date: 7/13/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 41
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 155428 & 155428S.
Summary
Applicant
Danielle Middlebrook, Agent
License Type
Series 10 & 10S - Beer and Wine Store with Sampling Privileges
Location
4700 N. 12th St., Ste. 118
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4
This request is for a new liquor license for a beer and wine store. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales. This business has plans to open
in October 2021.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 17, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 42
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Hidden Track Bottle Shop (Series 10)
111 W. Monroe St., Ste. 120, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 37
Liquor license violations: None
Hidden Track Bottle Shop (Series 12)
111 W. Monroe St., #121, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 37
Liquor license violations: None
Hidden Track Bottle Shop (Series 10)
5070 N. Central Ave., Phoenix
Calls for police service: 1
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“My partner and I have over 25 years of business and alchohal industry experience.
We currently hold 2(two) liquor license in good standing. This will be our third location.
We are well versed on AZ liquor laws and have found a successful model with zero
infractions.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Hidden Track Bottle Shop has been a staple of the downtown Phoenix community for
over 6 years. Granting this liquor license will allow us to share the global wines
available to us with our community while educating them on wine varietals, regions,
Page 43
and wine making practices.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Hidden Track Bottle Shop
Liquor License Map - Hidden Track Bottle Shop
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 44
Liquor License Data: HIDDEN TRACK BOTTLE SHOP
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 2 0
Wholesaler 4 2 0
Bar 6 9 2
Beer and Wine Bar 7 9 1
Liquor Store 9 10 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 11 1
Restaurant 12 40 5
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 147.29 125.47
Violent Crimes 8.58 22.95 21.01
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 153
Total Violations 89 282
Page 45
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1076013 1748 38 % 8% 17 %
1076022 1734 54 % 18 % 3%
1086011 1374 18 % 29 % 41 %
1086012 1402 58 % 36 % 46 %
1086021 790 37 % 38 % 22 %
1086022 1187 11 % 25 % 52 %
1086023 650 23 % 34 % 15 %
1086024 1171 24 % 9% 12 %
1088022 435 43 % 41 % 19 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 46
Liquor License Map: HIDDEN TRACK BOTTLE SHOP
4700 N 12TH ST
Ü
Date: 7/21/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 47
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 154904.
Summary
Applicant
Louis Vaagbay, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
7017 N. 19th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application was Sept. 7, 2021. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 48
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Authentic Liberian Cuisine is a dine-in and take-out restaurant with 10+ seating
capacity, and has the capacity of adding more seating if necessitated by demand.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This is a full-service restaurant serving the surrounding community and visiting public
patrons every single day of the week. While alcoholic beverage sales will generate a
small percentage of the overall sales, the investment in a Alcohol license is requested
as a service and convenience to the customers as an integral part of the dining
experience. Authentic Liberian Cuisine is a class 4 restaurant located in the heart of
Phoenix that specializes in the preparation of unique West African dishes. The
restaurant is open for business and continues to be extremely desirable to the public
by providing area residents, visitors and workers with a selection of authentic food at a
reasonable price. The inclusion of a license for incidental alcohol sales with food will
allow patrons the same service that they would experience at other local restaurants.
We strive to become a valuable member of the community and continue to work hard
to help the neighborhood achieve their development goal and continually improve the
character of the neighborhood.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Authentic Liberian Cuisine
Liquor License Map - Authentic Liberian Cuisine
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 49
Liquor License Data: AUTHENTIC LIBERIAN CUISINE
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Government 5 1 0
Bar 6 1 1
Liquor Store 9 4 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 7 2
Restaurant 12 5 1
Club 14 1 1
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 161.22 218.15
Violent Crimes 8.58 36.73 56.79
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 94
Total Violations 88 164
Page 50
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1060022 872 25 % 29 % 35 %
1060031 1266 32 % 33 % 51 %
1060032 1673 52 % 15 % 25 %
1061002 841 95 % 17 % 0%
1061003 1595 18 % 15 % 20 %
1061004 1106 95 % 18 % 0%
1061005 1074 10 % 23 % 30 %
1067011 1579 4% 25 % 57 %
1067012 803 9% 19 % 32 %
1067013 971 33 % 39 % 20 %
1067021 1512 70 % 10 % 24 %
1068021 1099 60 % 0% 9%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 51
Liquor License Map: AUTHENTIC LIBERIAN CUISINE
7017 N 19TH AVE
Ü
Date: 7/12/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 52
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Pettyjohn
Location
4700 E. Warner Road
Council District: 6
Function
Community Event
Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Oct. 23, 2021 - 11:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. / 100 attendees
Oct. 24, 2021 - 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. / 100 attendees
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 53
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.
Summary
Applicant
Andrea Pettyjohn
Location
4700 E. Warner Road
Council District: 6
Function
Festival
Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 13, 2021 - 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 100 attendees
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 54
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Columbus
Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.
Summary
Applicant
Michael Harris
Location
5045 E. Thomas Road
Council District: 6
Function
Festival
Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Oct. 23, 2021 - 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 100 attendees
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 55
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 155067.
Summary
Applicant
Hannah Stuart, Agent
License Type
Series 4 - Wholesaler
Location
431 N. 47th Ave.
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a wholesaler. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 11, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
Page 56
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I offer a combination of proven entrepreneurship in Phoenix and over 25 years of
success in breaking start-up beverage brands into the US market. I have spent years
in senior management for some of the largest FNB organizations and venues in Las
Vegas. I am well-versed in beverage distribution, marketing and the evolving
technology requirements necessary for B17 Galactic to differentiate itself in the
marketplace.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 57
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070161.
Summary
Applicant
Kim Kwiatkowski, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
2775 S. 75th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 7
This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a liquor store. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit. This business is currently under construction with plans to open in December
2021.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 11, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Page 58
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Circle K requires all store personnel to attend an in-house training program. This
training is designed to provide a safe and positive customer service environment. As
part of the Circle K training program, we provide an Alcohol Training Program that
meets the requirements of the Arizona Department of Liquor License Control.
Employees must pass a test on Techniques of Alcohol Management that becomes part
of their employee file. Store managers are required to attend additional in-house
manager training and obtain certification from the Arizona Department of Liquor
License Control. This certification requires submission of fingerprints and includes a
background investigation.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It is Circle K's objective to provide a product, accessible in a convenient manner that
meets the need of the surrounding community. Circle K's success depends on us
being able to provide products that are in demand.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Circle K Store #9541
Liquor License Map - Circle K Store #9541
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 59
Liquor License Data: CIRCLE K STORE #9541
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Liquor Store 9 1 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 2 0
Restaurant 12 2 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 53.66 127.38
Violent Crimes 8.58 6.82 12.63
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 14
Total Violations 89 14
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1125101 3939 67 % 5% 4%
1125102 931 93 % 10 % 39 %
1125111 2081 76 % 7% 11 %
1125112 3036 75 % 12 % 13 %
1125113 1068 84 % 1% 50 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 60
Liquor License Map: CIRCLE K STORE #9541
2775 S 75TH AVE
Ü
Date: 7/15/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 61
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070466.
Summary
Applicant
George Ibrahim, Agent
License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store
Location
3125 W. Buckeye Road
Zoning Classification: C-3
Council District: 7
This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a liquor store. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 17, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
Page 62
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
AZ Mini Market (Series 10)
3637 W. Dunlap Road, #C, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 26
Liquor license violations: None
1 Stop Market (Series 10)
610 W. Dunlap Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 6
Liquor license violations: None
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Too many years in Business Convinience Stores and Liquor & Spirite Histery with
100% in complience Rating my Experience in Business For Long Time FAMiLY
operating & managment well Gurateeed to run Business or Store Smoothly worryless
and with No Problems.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Good Management, Knowladge Owenership Understand Customers run the Business
in Leagal and Right Way To do The Best For Owner and Community, when
understanding that Pubic Intrest served will return in Busniess Favor.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Get It & Go Liquor
Liquor License Map - Get It & Go Liquor
Page 63
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 64
Liquor License Data: GET IT & GO LIQUOR
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Wholesaler 4 4 0
Bar 6 1 0
Liquor Store 9 1 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 8 3
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 47.31 66.66
Violent Crimes 8.58 11.54 19.95
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 42
Total Violations 89 51
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1125142 1556 51 % 10 % 7%
1145003 1018 42 % 15 % 57 %
1146001 2149 47 % 16 % 45 %
1147031 1794 45 % 16 % 64 %
1147032 4507 0% 0% 0%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 65
Liquor License Map: GET IT & GO LIQUOR
3125 W BUCKEYE RD
Ü
Date: 7/22/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 66
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 155475.
Summary
Applicant
Gus's New York Pizza
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
2755 N. 91st Ave., Ste. 100
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 18, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 67
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been representing liquor licensed establishments in Arizona for over 15 years.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Tourism plays an important role in our local economy and liquor licensed
establishments (the sale of alcohol) is very important aspect of tourism. Therefore, if
the City of Phoenix continues to lead the State of Arizona by approving quality and
diverse businesses (restaurants, bars, microbreweries, distilleries, hotels, resorts, golf
courses, special events, conveniece/grocery stores & gas stations) similar to this
proposed liquor licensed business, all businesses will prosper.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - Gus's New York Pizza
Liquor License Map - Gus's New York Pizza
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 68
Liquor License Data: GUS'S NEW YORK PIZZA
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Liquor Store 9 2 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 1 0
Hotel 11 1 0
Restaurant 12 4 4
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 74.76 97.98
Violent Crimes 8.58 16.05 26.43
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 104
Total Violations 89 146
Page 69
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
0820092 2444 59 % 9% 25 %
0820161 2648 65 % 11 % 23 %
0820171 2735 42 % 25 % 19 %
0820172 1746 87 % 18 % 21 %
0820181 2918 82 % 0% 16 %
0820182 1602 80 % 30 % 1%
0820282 2141 76 % 25 % 11 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 70
Liquor License Map: GUS'S NEW YORK PIZZA
2755 N 91ST AVE
Ü
Date: 7/22/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 71
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 154954.
Summary
Applicant
Steven Montgomery, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
1 N. 1st St., Ste. 103
Zoning Classification: DTC-Business Core
Council District: 7
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 10, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
Page 72
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.
Kettle Black (Series 12)
1 N. 1st. St., Ste. 108, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 22
Liquor license violations: In October 2018, a fine of $1,250 was paid for an employee
being intoxicated/disorderly while on duty.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I assert this view because I have studied and prepared, in order to receive all
necessary State certifications. These studies include high level knowledge of state &
federal guidelines when serving spiritous beverages, as well as preparing and serving
food in a full service restaurant. I have many years experience in the food industry and
look forward to partnering with other members of the community to ensure a safe and
clean social setting.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I am an active member in community groups and other organizations. I plan to have
an open door policy where guest, staff, business partners & community members can
communicate & thrive together. By providing a socially conscious & inclusive space for
a wide array of citizens, this restaurant will undoubtedly be a positive addition to the
downtown Phoenix community.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - The Desmond
Liquor License Map - The Desmond
Page 73
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 74
Liquor License Data: THE DESMOND
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Microbrewery 3 2 1
Wholesaler 4 1 0
Government 5 8 5
Bar 6 42 27
Beer and Wine Bar 7 12 6
Liquor Store 9 3 2
Beer and Wine Store 10 10 2
Hotel 11 7 5
Restaurant 12 76 35
Club 14 3 0
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 46.14 141.71 157
Violent Crimes 8.58 43.73 41.50
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 22
Total Violations 89 40
Page 75
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1131001 1015 7% 8% 28 %
1131002 1242 3% 7% 33 %
1132022 1257 47 % 29 % 55 %
1140001 1831 25 % 20 % 47 %
1140002 78 77 % 0% 32 %
1141001 2299 16 % 37 % 44 %
1142001 1321 36 % 22 % 50 %
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 76
Liquor License Map: THE DESMOND
1 N 1ST ST
Ü
Date: 7/14/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 77
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Corporation
Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.
Summary
Applicant
Amy Otto
Location
707 N. 3rd St., Ste. 130
Council District: 8
Function
Cocktail Event
Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Sept. 21, 2021 - 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 130 attendees
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 78
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 148846.
Summary
Applicant
Robert Delgado, Agent
License Type
Series 4 - Wholesaler
Location
4250 E. Superior Ave., Bldg. B, Ste. 200
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 8
This request is for a new liquor license for a wholesaler. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently being remodeled with plans to open in October 2021.
The 60-day limit for processing this application is Sept. 11, 2021.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
Page 79
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been in the liquor distribution business for 46 years, serving as the CEO of the
largest beer distributor in Arizona for the last 20 years.”
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 80
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 153134.
Summary
Applicant
Celeste Reytor, Agent
License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant
Location
15220 N. Cave Creek Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3
This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.
The 60-day limit for processing this application was Aug. 18, 2021. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.
Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.
Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.
Page 81
Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.
Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.
I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have attended multiple liquor law classes furthermore I currently run a successful
cleaning business. I have ensured that all employees attend a certified liquor law
course and will terminate employees who do not abide by the law. Additionally, I'm
committed to upholding the highest standards for my business and maintaining
compliance with applicable laws.”
The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I would like to offer our guests a drink with their meal if they choose. Our recipes and
menus items are prepared with consideration to consumption of beer, wine, spirits.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends disapproval of this application based on a Police Department
recommendation for disapproval. The Police Department disapproval is based on
several items that were omitted by the applicant on the application and possible hidden
ownership. The applicant has not demonstrated the capability, qualifications and
reliability to hold and control a liquor license.
Attachments
Liquor License Data - D's Jerk Hut
Liquor License Map - D's Jerk Hut
Liquor License Police Department Recommendation - D's Jerk Hut
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 82
Liquor License Data: D'S JERK HUT
Liquor License
Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile
Bar 6 2 2
Liquor Store 9 3 1
Beer and Wine Store 10 6 5
Restaurant 12 4 2
Crime Data
Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***
Property Crimes 45.54 51.40 72.18
Violent Crimes 8.44 11.43 16.13
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius
Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average
Parcels w/Violations 55 59
Total Violations 88 108
Page 83
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty
1033061 921 18 % 28 % 32 %
1033062 2272 17 % 22 % 37 %
1035011 1381 67 % 5% 23 %
1035012 999 80 % 8% 26 %
1035024 884 66 % 13 % 5%
1036061 1067 84 % 15 % 13 %
1036062 854 90 % 13 % 4%
1036063 2174 78 % 13 % 25 %
1036071 1285 83 % 3% 18 %
1036074 1299 89 % 0% 3%
Average 61 % 13 % 19 %
Page 84
Liquor License Map: D'S JERK HUT
15220 N CAVE CREEK RD
Ü
Date: 6/24/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi
City Clerk Department
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-47905) (Items 23-27)
Ordinance S-47905 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code section 42-13.
23 Gans & Pugh Associates, Inc.
For $18,341.00 in payment authority to purchase a MicroIP audio
transmitter kit for the Police Department. The MicroIP audio transmitter is
a high-quality miniature digital audio recorder system used by the Drug
Enforcement Bureau's Technical Surveillance Squad. The audio
transmitter is designed specifically for covert operations providing
external audio to investigators away from the target location. The
equipment can be worn by undercover detectives or placed in locations
such as the interior of a home or a vehicle. The rescue team will monitor
real time audio from an appropriate distance that does not compromise
the undercover detective. The audio transmitter will provide a life
preserving measure and increase the safety of the officer. The item will
be purchased with funding from the 2019 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant.
24 Sirchie Acquisition Company LLC
For $83,700.00 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or
about Sept. 15, 2021 for a term of five years for sexual assault kits for the
Police Department. The kits are vital to test victims that have been
sexually assaulted. The kits contain evidence collection tools that can
collect and safely store evidence. The equipment is a critical part of the
Police Department's effort to process crime scenes accurately and
Page 90
efficiently; collect and impound evidence and analyze evidence to assist
in criminal investigations.
25 Settlement of Claim(s) Gutierrez v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of $30,000.00 in settlement of claim(s) in Gutierrez v.
pursuant to Phoenix City Code chapter 42. This is a settlement of bodily
injury and property damage claim arising out of a motor vehicle accident
on May 20, 2020 involving the Police Department.
26 AJP Electric, Inc.
For $42,500.00 in additional payment authority for Agreement 148621, for
Change Order 1 Project ST89330183 for FY2018 Federal TAP HAWK
Installation for the Street Transportation Department. The additional funds
cover additional construction work and additional time necessary to
complete the project as the contractor encountered several issues that
included: conflicts with design plans, unforeseen field conditions,
right-of-way restrictions outside the normal practices, water leaks,
up-sizing of traffic signal poles; and utility relocation and, or coordination.
27 National Association of Clean Water Agencies - Annual
Payment
For $57,325.00 in payment authority for membership renewal to the
National Association of Clean Water Agencies for the Water Services
Department. The National Association of Clean Water Agencies conducts
a financial survey of the wastewater industry that Water Services uses to
benchmark its operations, provides information used by Water Services
to formulate policy recommendations on Clean Water Act issues and
offers opportunities to collaborate with colleagues around the country to
help shape national policy. This item was approved by the Transportation,
Infrastructure and Innovation Subcommittee on April 7, 2021.
Page 91
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
This item is a proposed Resolution for the City Council to appoint Assistant City
Manager Jeff Barton as City Manager upon the retirement of City Manager Ed
Zuercher on Oct. 8, 2021.
Summary
Jeff Barton has served as the Assistant City Manager since February 2021. Prior to
that, Mr. Barton was a Deputy City Manager, and served as the Director of the Budget
and Research Department.
Mr. Barton has served in the City of Phoenix for 22 years, starting as an internal
auditor in the City Auditor Department. He has focused on the City's comprehensive
budget and maintaining the City's sensible financial stewardship.
Mr. Barton holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from Morehouse College
and a Master of Public Administration from Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Law and Human Resources departments on behalf of the
Page 92
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the Mayor, on behalf of the City Council, to enter into an
agreement with Jeff Barton as City Manager effective Oct. 8, 2021, with the following
principal terms.
Summary
The agreement with the City Manager shall commence on Oct. 8, 2021 and shall
continue for an indefinite term as provided in the City Charter.
The City Manager shall receive an annual salary of $370,011.20 paid bi-weekly, with
annual increases equal to the total compensation percentage awarded by the City
Council to employee groups, subject to City Council disapproval at the City Manager's
annual performance review. The City Manager shall receive the same benefit and
fringe benefit package as other City executives. The City Manager's pension will be
calculated based solely upon his salary in accordance with Sec. 401(a)(17) of the
Internal Revenue Code. This code provision currently limits pensionable compensation
to $290,000.
The City Manager shall receive no honorariums for speaking engagements on his own
time, but the City will pay appropriate and reasonable expenses related to such
speaking engagements related to his position, leadership, equality, and similar topics.
The City Council recognizes the importance of the City Manager's participation in
professional and civic organizations in the performance of his duties and the City shall
reimburse the City Manager for ordinary and usual educational and membership
expenses incurred by the City Manager not to exceed $2,500 annually.
The City Manager shall have until Dec. 31, 2023 to comply with the residency
requirement for the position.
In the event the City Council removes the City Manager from the position prior to his
retirement eligibility date, then the City Manager shall be assigned to his former
position of Assistant City Manager at his former salary until he reaches retirement
eligibility or shall be permitted to cash out all of his accrued sick leave at 100% of his
Page 93
base hourly salary if he leaves City employment prior to retirement eligibility.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Human Resources and Law departments on behalf of the
Page 94
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Pole at Washington Park (Ordinance S-47909)
Request City Council to grant a public utility easement, for consideration of $1.00
and/or other valuable consideration, for the installation of an underground distribution
electrical line and pole on City-owned property within the Salt River Project (SRP)
service area; and further ordering the Ordinance recorded.
Summary
This public utility easement will be for the area more fully described in the legal
description to be recorded with the Ordinance ("Easement Premises") and will be
granted to all public service corporations, agricultural improvement districts, and
telecommunication corporations providing utility service (collectively "Grantee") to Well
304 in perpetuity so long as Grantee uses the Easement Premises for the purposes
herein specified for an indefinite period, subject to the following terms and conditions:
A. Grantee is hereby granted the right to construct, reconstruct, replace, repair,
operate and maintain utility facilities together with appurtenant fixtures for use in
connection therewith (collectively "Grantee Facilities") to, through, across and
beyond Grantor's property within the Easement Premises. Subject to the notice
requirements provided in paragraph "I," Grantee shall at all times have the right of
full and free ingress and egress to and along the Easement Premises for the
purposes herein specified. Grantee acknowledges and accepts that Grantee shall
share the Easement Premises with other Grantees and shall use such Easement
Premises with other Grantees in accordance with and consistent with industry
standards and customs for shared use. Grantor agrees to coordinate the location of
Grantee's Facilities within the Easement Premises and to pay costs for relocation of
Grantee's Facilities as provided in paragraph "F."
B. Grantor shall not locate, erect or construct, or permit to be located or erected or
constructed, any building or structure within the limits of the Easement Premises.
However, Grantor reserves all other rights, interests, and uses of the Easement
Premises that are not inconsistent with Grantee's easement rights herein conveyed
and which do not interfere with or endanger any of the Grantee Facilities.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Grantor shall not have the right to lower by more
than one foot or raise by more than two feet the surface grade of Easement
Page 95
Premises without the prior written consent by the Grantee whose facilities will be
affected by the change of elevation.
C. Grantee shall not have the right to use the Easement Premises to store gasoline or
petroleum products, hazardous or toxic substances, or flammable materials;
provided however, that this prohibition shall not apply to any material, equipment or
substance contained in, or a part of, the Grantee Facilities, provided that Grantee
must comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations in
connection therewith. Additionally, the Easement Premises may not be used for the
storage of construction-related materials or to park or store construction-related
vehicles or equipment except on a temporary basis to construct, reconstruct,
replace, repair, operate or maintain the Grantee Facilities.
D. Grantor shall maintain an appropriate three-foot clear area around all edges of all
equipment pads for Grantee Facilities in addition to a clear operational area that
extends 12 feet immediately in front of all transformer or switching cabinet
openings, within the Easement Premises. No obstruction, trees, shrubs, fixtures or
permanent structures shall be placed or permitted by Grantor within said areas.
Grantee is hereby granted the right to trim, prune, cut, and clear away trees, brush,
shrubs or other obstruction within said areas.
E. Grantee shall exercise reasonable care to avoid damage to the Easement Premises
and all improvements thereon and agrees that following any work or use by Grantee
within the Easement Premises, the affected area, including without limitation, all
pavement, landscaping, concrete and other improvements permitted within the
Easement Premises pursuant to this easement will be restored by Grantee to as
close to original condition as is reasonably possible, at the expense of Grantee.
F. Grantor reserves the right to require the relocation of Grantee Facilities to a new
location within Grantor's property; provided however, that: (1) Grantor pays the
entire cost of redesigning and relocating existing Grantee Facilities to the new
location; and (2) Grantor provides Grantee with a new and substantially similar
public utility easement at no cost to Grantee. After relocation of Grantee Facilities to
the new easement area, Grantee shall abandon its rights to use the Easement
Premises granted in this easement without cost or consequence to Grantor.
G. Each public service corporation and telecommunication services corporation as a
Grantee shall coordinate and work with other Grantees in the use of the Easement
Premises. In the event that a third party or other Grantee requests the relocation of
existing Grantee Facilities to a new location (whether or not) within the Easement
Premises, the requesting party shall pay the entire cost of redesigning and
relocating the existing Grantee Facilities.
H. Grantee shall not have the right to transfer, convey or assign its interests in this
easement to any individual, corporation or other entity without the prior written
consent of Grantor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Grantee
shall notify Grantor of any proposed transfer, conveyance or assignment of any
Page 96
rights granted herein at address listed below.
I. Except in emergencies or exigent circumstances such as service restoration,
Grantee agrees to contact Grantor at least one business day prior to Grantee's
entrance onto the Easement Premises where the Easement Premises are located:
(1) on a site that includes Aviation Department facilities; (2) water and wastewater
treatment facilities; (3) Police Department headquarters located at 620 W.
Washington St.; (4) Fire Department headquarters located at 150 S. 12th St.; (5)
City Hall located at 200 W. Washington St.; (6) City Court Building located at 300 W.
Washington St.; (7) Calvin C. Goode Building located at 251 W. Washington St.; (8)
Transit Operations Center located at 320 N. 1st Ave. or West Transit Facility located
at 405 N. 79th Ave.; or (9) in a secured or fenced area.
Location
6655 N. 23rd Ave., identified by Maricopa County assessor parcel Number 156-10-
001A.
Council District: 5
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation and Finance departments.
Page 97
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
47911)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to terminate and extinguish an
easement located at 8726 E. Monterey Way in Scottsdale, Ariz., recorded Oct. 1, 1949
in Docket 443, Page 280.
Summary
The water main located within the easement was removed from the City of Phoenix
water distribution system in December 2011. As a result, the 33-foot easement is no
longer needed by the Water Services Department and can be terminated upon
removal or backfilling of the water main. As consideration for termination of the
easement at this location, the property owners excavated, crushed in place, and
backfilled the water line within their property boundaries. Water Services Department
staff confirmed that this work was completed in March 2021.
Location
8726 E. Monterey Way, Scottsdale, Ariz., identified by Maricopa County Assessor's
parcel number 130-40-178.
Council District: Out of City
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
and Finance departments.
Page 98
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
-47912)
Request for the City Council to accept easements for preservation and drainage
purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.
Easement (a)
Applicant: Andrew Robert Chace and Megan Duty, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Preservation
Location: 8436 N. 14th St.
File: FN 210060
Council District: 6
Easement (b)
Applicant: Exeter 39th Land, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 4065 W. Lower Buckeye Road
File: FN 210053
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning
and Development and Finance departments.
Page 99
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Utility, and Sidewalk Purposes (Ordinance S-47918)
Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate a deed and easements for
roadway, public utility, and sidewalk purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.
Deed (a)
Applicant: Hammer Homes, Inc., its successor and assigns
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 18809 N. 30th St.
File: FN 210051
Council District: 2
Easement (b)
Applicant: Benjamin Beltran, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 736 W. Harwell Road
File: FN 210048
Council District: 7
Easement (c)
Applicant: 4221 Thomas LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 4221 E. Thomas Road
File: FN 210062
Council District: 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning
and Development and Finance departments.
Page 100
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
47907)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a cooperative
participating agreement with IES Communications, LLC using existing spending
authority provided by Ordinances S-44246 and S-46260, to purchase Audio Video
Equipment and Service for the Aviation Department. A cooperative contract ADSPO17-
184598 was established by the State of Arizona under solicitation number ADSPO17-
00007302. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related
to this item. No additional spending authority is requested.
Summary
The City Council authorized multiple linking agreements for the purchase, installation,
and service of Audio Video (AV) equipment on Jan. 24, 2018, utilizing the State of
Arizona cooperative solicitation ADSPO17-00007302. At that time, the City
inadvertently excluded IES Communications, LLC from that Council approval request.
The Aviation Department is requesting to use the cooperative agreement with IES
Communications, LLC to service the AV equipment in various Aviation facilities
because they were the vendor responsible for installing the equipment including but
not limited to cameras, video conferencing and video recording equipment, in some of
the department’s facilities. This AV equipment is now past the warranty and requires
periodic servicing. The City will experience cost and time savings by utilizing the
additional AV contract with IES Communications, LLC for repairs, maintenance and
replacement parts to support the original equipment.
No additional funding is requested to add IES Communications, LLC as a vendor.
Spending authority will be shared with the previously authorized Audio Video
Equipment Service contracts authorized in Ordinances S-44246 and S-46260. AV
equipment and service contracts are available for Citywide departments.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, a participating agreement is
required when the City uses a cooperative agreement from another public agency. The
contract was awarded through competitive processes consistent with the City's
Page 101
procurement processes, as set forth in the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43.
The State of Arizona contract, which was awarded on Oct. 16, 2017, covers the
purchase of AV equipment and service as required by the Aviation department. The
use of this cooperative will provide the City national discounts on these products.
Additionally, review of pricing and availability from registered small and local
businesses indicates that this cooperative contract offers the best value to the City.
Upon City Council approval of this item, a purchasing agreement incorporating the
City’s terms and conditions will be fully executed between the referenced vendor and
the City.
The Assistant Finance Director recommends that the cooperative participating
agreement with IES Communications, LLC be accepted.
Contract Term
The contract term will begin on or about Sept. 8, 2021 and end Jan. 28, 2023.
Financial Impact
The initial aggregate authorization for Audio and Video Equipment and Service
Contracts was for an expenditure not-to-exceed $3.6 million. Amendments 1 and 2
increased the aggregate authorization of the contracts by $3.85 million, for a new total
not-to exceed contract value of $7.45 million.
No additional funding is requested. By adding IES Communications, LLC to Ordinance
S-46260, previously authorized spending authority will be used. Funding is available in
the Aviation Department’s budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Audio Video Equipment and Service Contracts 147007-147011 and 147438
(Ordinance S-44246) on Jan. 24, 2018;
· Audio Video Equipment and Service Contract 147010 - Amendment (Ordinance S-
45757) on June 5, 2019; and
· Audio Video Equipment and Service Contracts 147007-147011 and 147438 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-46260) on Dec. 18, 2019.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.
Page 102
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amendment 2 (Ordinance S-47913)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendments to
Agreements 145692 with VWR International, LLC and 145861 with Fisher Scientific
Company, LLC, to provide additional funding for the purchase of laboratory equipment
and supplies for the Police Department's business continuity. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures included in this amendment will not exceed $175,000.
Summary
The agreements for laboratory equipment and supplies are vital for the daily
operations of the Water Services and Police departments. The National Association of
State Procurement Officials (NASPO) ValuePoint Cooperative was adopted to obtain
best value, and in some cases, achieve more favorable pricing than what is obtainable
by an individual state or local government agency.
The additional funding requested in this amendment is necessary to allow the Police
Department to continue to purchase items essential for use in the forensic labs. As a
result of increased pricing, attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic, funding was
exhausted sooner than anticipated.
Contract Term
The agreement terms will remain unchanged, ending on March 31, 2022.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for Laboratory Equipment and Supplies Cooperative Contract
Agreements was for an aggregate expenditure not-to-exceed $4.4 million. Amendment
1 increased the authorization for the agreements by an additional $1.1 million. This
amendment will increase the authorization for the agreements by an additional
$175,000, for a new total not-to-exceed agreement value of $5,675,000.
Funding for this amendment is available in the Police Department’s budget.
Page 103
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Laboratory Equipment and Supplies Cooperative Contract Agreements 145962 and
145861 (Ordinance S-43659) on June 21, 2017; and
· Laboratory Equipment and Supplies Cooperative Contract Agreements 145962 and
145861 - Amendment 1 (Ordinance S-47395) on March 17, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Deputy City Manager
Karen Peters, and the Police and Water Services departments.
Page 104
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amendment 2 (Ordinance S-47915)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 142612 with Newmark Knight Frank Management for property
management services to extend the agreement's term an additional nine months and
pay the monthly fees for that extension. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The expenditures for services included in this
amendment will not exceed $31,500.
Summary
In April 2016, a property management services agreement was awarded via a Request
for Proposals (RFP) process to Newmark Knight Frank Management (Newmark) for
the Village Shopping Center (VSC), a multi-use shopping center located at 19th and
Dunlap avenues owned by the Public Transit Department (PTD.) The initial agreement
expired April 13, 2021, with no remaining options to extend. On March 17, 2021, City
Council authorized amending the agreement to extend the term through Sept. 30,
2021 to provide time to re-solicit, but it was subsequently determined that a significant
restructuring of this solicitation will be necessary to encourage more competition, so
additional time will be required for the re-solicitation. The City intends to issue the
restructured solicitation this fall.
RFP PTD20-009 was issued in January 2021 for property management services of
VSC and the Public Transit Building. That solicitation was canceled on April 2 after the
only two bidders were disqualified due to being found non-responsive and non-
responsible. This amendment will provide a further nine-month extension, which will
enable PTD staff to issue a new RFP and ensure seamless customer service for
tenants at VSC and the Public Transit Building.
Procurement Information
The initial agreement with Newmark was procured in accordance with Phoenix City
Code Chapter 43 and Administrative Regulation 3.10. An exception to the procurement
process was determined for this extension as set forth in the City of Phoenix’s
Administrative Regulation 3.10.
Page 105
Contract Term
This further extension will be for the period from Oct. 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022.
Financial Impact
Newmark's current monthly management fee will continue at the current rate of
$3,500, not to exceed a total of $31,500 for this amendment's nine-month extension
period. It is anticipated that lease revenues from the Village Shopping Center will offset
all expenses associated with this amendment. Funds exceeding the lease revenues
are available in the Public Transit Department's Operating budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Property Management Services Agreement 142612 (Ordinance S-42427) on April 6,
2016; and
· Property Management Services Agreement 142612 - Amendment 1 (Ordinance S-
47376) on March 17, 2021.
Location
1945 W. Dunlap Ave.
Council District: 5
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Finance and
Public Transit departments.
Page 106
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(B) (Ordinance S-47917)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend and continue using
Ordinances S-42384 and S-47172 under Contract 147966 with BIBLIOTHECA LLC for
the purchase of products, annual maintenance and services for library-specific
hardware and software from Bibliotheca. Further request authorization for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. No additional funds are needed.
Summary
This contract provides Bibliotheca products and services and annual maintenance
which the Library Department utilizes to support and maintain self-checkout stations,
Open+ count sensors and occupancy software, RFID security gates, automated
materials handler hardware and software, and RFID staff workstations. Additionally,
the contract provides annual libraryConnect reporting software subscriptions and RFID
tags for library materials. Lack of a contract would negatively impact operations,
potentially resulting in manual check-in and sorting of books and materials, and book
material unavailability or loss.
Approval of this extension will allow time to complete a new procurement process and
ensure current city services are not interrupted.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract term will be extended through Sept. 30, 2022.
Financial Impact
The contract was approved with an original aggregate value of $1,800,000 and
additional funds of $807,000 were added for a total aggregate amount of $2,607,000.
No additional funds are needed for this extension. Any remaining funds authorized by
previous Council action will be applied to the extended contract term. Funds are
available in the Library Department’s budget.
Page 107
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This contract was originally approved by City Council on March 24, 2016; and
additional expenditures were authorized on Dec. 16, 2020.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.
Page 108
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
ADPSO17-0006933D (Ordinance S-47922)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 148480 with Guidesoft, Inc. for the purchase of managed
services provider Information Technology professional services for citywide use.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $3,810,000.
Summary
This contract provides IT professional services through a managed service provider for
technology projects and initiatives throughout the City, such as project management,
system implementation, data conversion, and hardware and software configuration.
Additional funds are needed due to usage that has been higher than originally
anticipated and to support projects including Information Technology Services’
enterprise-wide network and firewall improvements project; positions to support the
Finance Department's SAP infrastructure; the Fire Department's Electronic Patient
Care Reporting and CAD Modernization projects; migration of legacy data that is no
longer supported; End User Device Replacement Program; IT Asset Management and
Unified Print Program; Police Records Management System project; and positions to
support the Water Services Department’s Permit and Compliance System and
Technology Services Division. Additionally, this contract enables the City to obtain
contracted IT staff to assist with ongoing work assignments when necessary. The
departments currently utilizing these contract services include the Fire, Human
Services, Information Technology Services, Parks and Recreation, Police, Street
Transportation and Water Services departments.
Contract Term
The contract term is Sept. 6, 2018 through Aug. 31, 2023.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of $3,810,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $7,476,000. Funds are available in the various departments’
budgets.
Page 109
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This contract was originally approved by City Council on Sept. 5, 2018 for an original
aggregate value of $1,100,000. On Dec. 5, 2018, City Council authorized an additional
expenditure in the amount of $200,000 and on Nov. 20, 2019 approved an additional
expenditure in the amount of $2,366,000 increasing the aggregate value to
$3,666,000.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Finance Department.
Page 110
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
21-035 (Ordinance S-47923)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into cooperative
participating agreements with First Legal Network, LLC, Nationwide Legal Services,
LLC, and On the Run Legal Solutions, LLC, to purchase legal processing, notary, and
related services for citywide use. A cooperative contract was established by the State
of Arizona under solicitation number BPM002577. Further request authorization for the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The aggregate contract value
will not exceed $350,000.
Summary
The City of Phoenix needs contracts with multiple vendors who can provide legal
processing, notary, and related services in order to support all City Departments.
These services are used by various departments citywide, but primarily by the
Neighborhood Services Department and the Law Department to deliver a wide array of
legal notices to residents and businesses. Notices include construction violations,
investigations, court proceedings for both in-state and out-of-state addresses, public
notices, notary services, court filings, and complete processing services.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, a participating agreement is
required when the City uses a cooperative agreement from another public agency. The
contracts were awarded through a competitive process, consistent with the City's
procurement process, as set forth in the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43. The contracts
cover the purchase of legal processing, notary, and related services as required by the
City and were awarded Aug. 1, 2020. Upon City Council approval of this item,
purchasing agreements incorporating the City’s terms and conditions will be fully
executed between the referenced vendors and the City.
An established best practice in government procurement, Cooperative Agreements
provide extensive benefits to procurement officials by leveraging volume purchasing
for maximum cost benefit and ensuring best value.
The Assistant Finance Director recommends that agreements with First Legal Network,
Page 111
LLC, Nationwide Legal Services, LLC, and On the Run Legal Solutions, LLC be
accepted.
Contract Term
The five-year contract term will begin on or about Sept. 20, 2021.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $350,000. Funds are available in various
departments' budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Finance Department.
Page 112
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Ordinance S-47924)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a cooperative
participating agreement with Xerox Corporation to lease high volume digital black and
white production printers for the City Clerk Department. A cooperative contract was
established by the State of Arizona under solicitation number ADSPO18-00008023.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The aggregate contract value will not exceed $900,000.
Summary
The contract will provide the City Clerk Department black and white production printers
used to complete high volume projects for all City departments. These projects
include: City Council agendas, sex offender notifications, budget books, account
statements, informational materials for the community and other large quantity printing
for essential City operations each year. Access to Xerox’s catalog for black and white
production printers through the State’s contract allows the City to leverage the benefits
of an extensive competitive process previously completed by the State of Arizona
which ensures competitive pricing.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, a participating agreement is
required when the City uses a cooperative agreement from another public agency. The
contract was awarded through competitive processes consistent with the City’s
procurement processes, as set forth in the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43.
The State of Arizona contract covers the leasing of black and white production printers
as required by the City Clerk Department. The State of Arizona contract was awarded
on Oct. 5, 2018. The use of this cooperative will provide the City national discounts on
these products. Additionally, review of pricing and availability from registered small and
local businesses indicates that this cooperative contract offers the best value to the
City.
Page 113
Upon City Council approval of this item, a purchasing agreement incorporating the
City’s terms and conditions will be fully executed between the referenced vendor and
the City.
Both the American Bar Association and the National Institute of Government
Purchasing endorse the use of Cooperative Agreements by municipalities and other
public institutions. An established best practice in government procurement,
Cooperative Agreements provide extensive benefits to procurement officials by
leveraging volume purchasing for maximum cost benefit and ensuring best value.
The Assistant Finance Director recommends that the cooperative agreement with
Xerox Corporation be accepted.
Contract Term
The five-year contract term will begin on or about Nov. 1, 2021.
Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $900,000. Funds are available in the City
Clerk Department’s budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.
Page 114
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures and to extend Contract 141054 with Simplot Partners for the purchase of
rye grass seed for the Parks and Recreation Department. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures will not exceed $66,000.
Summary
This contract provides rye grass seed, which is used each fall to over seed
downtown/special event parks such as Margaret T. Hance Park, and athletic fields to
maintain compliance with Major League Baseball standards, as well as national
standards for tournaments played at Reach 11. These parks and athletic fields are
operated and maintained by the Parks and Recreation Department. Industry-wide,
there is currently an increase in price and limited availability for rye-grass seed; and
other local organizations have confirmed experiencing the same issues obtaining
seed. Due to this unexpected 100 percent price increase, the Parks and Recreation
Department needs additional funds to continue daily operations for this upcoming
seeding season. The addition funds should be sufficient to cover the seed costs
through the end of this contract term.
Contract Term
The contract term is July 23, 2015 through Jan. 1, 2022.
Financial Impact
Upon approval of the $66,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $829,000. Funds are available in the Parks and Recreation
Department's budget.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This contract was originally approved by City Council on July 1, 2015; and additional
expenditures were authorized on April 20, 2016, May 6, 2020 and June 23, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Page 115
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Committee 610 Recommendations - Utilities Service Specialist - Assignment for
Water Services Department (Ordinance S-47933)
As part of a market analysis, the following amendments to the Pay Ordinance [S-
47689] are recommended in accordance with the recommendation of Human
Resources Committee 610, effective Sept. 20, 2021. The amendments also require the
City’s Classification Ordinance [S-5815] to be updated. Those will be processed under
a separate ordinance.
Establish the classification assignment of Utilities Service Specialist*Water, Job Code:
01372, Salary Plan: 006, Benefit Category: 003, Labor Unit Code:003, Grade: 325
($17.11 - $24.92/hourly), EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Non-
Exempt.
Modify the classification assignment of Utilities Service Specialist*Lead, Job Code:
01371, Salary Plan: 006, Benefit Category: 003, Labor Unit Code: 003, EEO-4
Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Non-Exempt from Grade: 325 ($17.11
- $24.92/hourly) to Grade: 326 ($17.97 - $26.08/hourly).
Modify the classification of Utilities Credit Counselor, Job Code: 50160, Salary Plan
006, Grade: 328 ($19.59 - $28.75/hourly), Benefit Category: 003, Labor Unit Code:
003, EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Non-Exempt to the new
class title of Senior Utilities Services Specialist.
Summary
Background
The Utilities Service Specialist job family was evaluated for external market
competitiveness in May/June 2020. At that time, the salary and range were determined
to be competitive with the external labor market. Furthermore, the City was not
experiencing turnover or retention issues at Step 4 and above. The recommendation at
the time was to continue the practice of hiring new employees at Step 3 and recognize
that this may be a “gateway” classification. Newly hired employees may view this
classification/job family as their entryway into the City and plan to transfer and move to
other jobs or departments in short order. The City, and the Water Services Department
Page 116
in particular, should plan for a high level of internal movement and a highly transitory
workforce in the call center.
Findings
Further analysis of the job family, after the initial study results were shared, illuminated
a concern with internal alignment of jobs and the relative complexity of the job duties in
the Water Services Department compared with other positions located elsewhere in
the City. To resolve this internal alignment issue, an “assignment” is proposed to
provide a one-grade increase for those positions located in the Water Services
Department.
Increasing the grade of the assignment would also necessitate a concurrent grade
increase in the existing Lead assignment to maintain structural integrity, ensuring the
Lead assignment is allocated to a higher grade than the subordinate classes.
The Water Department will also take this opportunity to retitle one of the classifications
(Utilities Credit Counselor), to bring the title in line with the actual job duties and to
better reflect the true nature of the job.
Conclusions
Providing an assignment for the Utilities Service Specialist positions in the Water
Services Department will recognize the higher level of complexity and specialization in
this Department. Because it is an assignment, there is no impact to the incumbents’
“time in class” and no impact on seniority. The other actions (regrade the Lead
assignment and retitle the Credit Counselor) will also result in no impact to seniority
because there will be no change to the job codes for these actions.
Financial Impact
The estimated costs of these actions for a full fiscal year, including benefits, is
approximately $116,200. Funding is available in the Water Services Department.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This action was reviewed and recommended for approval by Human Resources
Committee 610 on Aug. 10, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the Human
Resources Department.
Page 117
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Resources Committee 610 Recommendations - Utilities Service Specialist -
Assignment for Water Services Department (Ordinance S-47934)
As part of a market analysis the following amendments to the Classification Ordinance
[S-5815] are recommended in accordance with the recommendation of Human
Resources Committee 610, effective Sept. 20, 2021. The amendments also require the
City’s Pay Ordinance [S-47689] to be updated. Those will be processed under a
separate ordinance.
Establish the classification assignment of Utilities Service Specialist*Water, Job Code:
01372, Salary Plan: 006, Benefit Category: 003, Labor Unit Code: 003, Grade: 325
($17.11 - $24.92/hourly), EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Non-
Exempt.
Modify the classification assignment of Utilities Service Specialist*Lead, Job Code:
01371, Salary Plan: 006, Benefit Category: 003, Labor Unit Code: 003, EEO-4
Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Non-Exempt from Grade: 325 ($17.11
- $24.92/hourly) to Grade: 326 ($17.97 - $26.08/hourly).
Modify the classification of Utilities Credit Counselor, Job Code: 50160, Salary Plan:
006, Grade: 328 ($19.59 - $28.75/hourly), Benefit Category: 003, Labor Unit Code:
003, EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Non-Exempt to the new
class title of Senior Utilities Services Specialist.
Summary
Background
The Utilities Service Specialist job family was evaluated for external market
competitiveness in May/June 2020. At that time, the salary and range were determined
to be competitive with the external labor market. Furthermore, the City was not
experiencing turnover or retention issues at Step 4 and above. The recommendation at
the time was to continue the practice of hiring new employees at Step 3 and recognize
that this may be a “gateway” classification. Newly hired employees may view this
classification/job family as their entryway into the City and plan to transfer and move to
other jobs or departments in short order. The City, and the Water Services Department
Page 118
in particular, should plan for a high level of internal movement and a highly transitory
workforce in the call center.
Findings
Further analysis of the job family, after the initial study results were shared, illuminated
a concern with internal alignment of jobs and the relative complexity of the job duties in
the Water Services Department compared with other positions located elsewhere in
the City. To resolve this internal alignment issue, an “assignment” is proposed to
provide a one-grade increase for those positions located in the Water Services
Department.
Increasing the grade of the assignment would also necessitate a concurrent grade
increase in the existing Lead assignment to maintain structural integrity, ensuring the
Lead assignment is allocated to a higher grade than the subordinate classes.
The Water Department will also take this opportunity to retitle one of the classifications
(Utilities Credit Counselor), to bring the title in line with the actual job duties and to
better reflect the true nature of the job.
Conclusions
Providing an assignment for the Utilities Service Specialist positions in the Water
Services Department will recognize the higher level of complexity and specialization in
this department. Because it is an assignment, there is no impact to the incumbents’
“time in class” and no impact on seniority. The other actions (regrade the Lead
assignment and retitle the Credit Counselor) will also result in no impact to seniority
because there will be no change to the job codes for these actions.
Financial Impact
The estimated costs of these actions for a full fiscal year, including benefits, is
approximately $116,200. Funding is available in the Water Services Department.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This action was reviewed and recommended for approval by Human Resources
Committee 610 on Aug. 10, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the Human
Resources Department.
Page 119
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Committee 610 Recommendations - Engineering Manager - Middle Manager
(Ordinance S-47935)
As part of a technical positions review, the following amendments to the Pay
Ordinance [S-47689] are recommended in accordance with the recommendation of
Human Resources Committee 610, effective Sept. 20, 2021. The amendments also
require the City’s Classification Ordinance [S-5815] to be updated. Those will be
processed under a separate ordinance.
Establish the classification of Engineering Manager, Job Code: 21150, Salary Plan:
013, Grade: 840 ($35.97 - $57.54/hourly), Benefit Category: 009, Labor Unit Code:
008, EEO-4 Category: Officials and Administrators, FLSA Status: Exempt.
Modify the classification of Engineering Supervisor, Job Code: 20240, from Salary
Plan: 013, Grade 840 ($35.97 - $57.54/hourly), Benefit Category: 009, Labor Unit
Code: 008, EEO-4 Category: Officials and Administrators, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Salary Plan: 001, Grade: 041 ($37.14 - $56.39/hourly), Benefit Category: 007, Labor
Unit Code: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt.
Abolish the classification assignment of Engineering Supervisor*U7, Job Code: 20241,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade: 041 ($37.14 - $56.39/hourly), Benefit Category: 007, Labor
Unit Code: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt.
Summary
Background
The City has gone through various changes in the role of Engineering Supervisor. Prior
to 1987, there was only one classification for Engineering Supervisor, and it was
allocated to Unit 7 - ASPTEA at a grade 040. In March 1987, an “assignment” was
established at a middle manager level, grade 840 and positions were transitioned to
this level over time through attrition. By 1992, all positions had been transitioned and
the original base classification was modified from Unit 7 - ASPTEA, grade 040 to the
middle manager, grade 840. Subsequently all positions and employees were moved
from the assignment to the base classification.
Page 120
In February 2012, it was determined that having a middle manager (Engineering
Supervisor - grade 840) reporting to another middle manager (Deputy Director - grade
842) was an inefficient arrangement. A new “assignment” was established out of the
middle manager level and allocated to Unit 7 at grade 041. Over time, all positions
were moved to this assignment.
Current State
There are five employees in the “assignment” Engineering Supervisor*U7, grade 041.
None of these employees have ever been in the base classification from which this
assignment is associated. However, because they are in an assignment, they have
rights back to the base classification. Furthermore, the base classification (840) and
the assignment (041) have the same job description.
Conclusion
The recommended course of action is to follow the same methodology employed in
1992, effectively reversing the previous strategy and reestablishing a middle manager
level at a grade 840 to serve as a career progression step toward the Deputy Director
level at 842.
The base classification will be modified to reflect the allocation to Unit 7, and the grade
maintained at 041. This is consistent with the employees’ job history, so there will be
no negative impact to the employees when they are reverted from the assignment to
the base classification. Once those transactions have been processed, the assignment
level will be abolished.
A new classification will be established at the middle manager level, grade 840. Thus,
the association of the assignment will be separated, and each classification will have
unique and separate job descriptions.
Financial Impact
There is no budgetary impact associated with these actions.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This action was reviewed and recommended for approval by Human Resources
Committee 610 on Aug. 10, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the Human
Resources Department.
Page 121
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Resources Committee 610 Recommendations - Engineering Manager - Middle
Manager (Ordinance S-47936)
As part of a technical positions review, the following amendments to the Classification
Ordinance [S-5815] are recommended in accordance with the recommendation of
Human Resources Committee 610, effective Sept. 20, 2021. The amendments also
require the City’s Pay Ordinance [S-47689] to be updated. Those will be processed
under a separate ordinance.
Establish the classification of Engineering Manager, Job Code: 21150, Salary Plan:
013, Grade: 840 ($35.97 - $57.54/hourly), Benefit Category: 009, Labor Unit Code:
008, EEO-4 Category: Officials and Administrators, FLSA Status: Exempt.
Modify the classification of Engineering Supervisor, Job Code: 20240, from Salary
Plan: 013, Grade: 840 ($35.97 - $57.54/hourly), Benefit Category: 009, Labor Unit
Code: 008, EEO-4 Category: Officials and Administrators, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Salary Plan: 001, Grade 041 ($37.14 - $56.39/hourly), Benefit Category: 007, Labor
Unit Code: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt.
Abolish the classification assignment of Engineering Supervisor*U7, Job Code: 20241,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade: 041 ($37.14 - $56.39/hourly), Benefit Category: 007, Labor
Unit Code: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt.
Summary
Background
The City has gone through various changes in the role of Engineering Supervisor. Prior
to 1987, there was only one classification for Engineering Supervisor, and it was
allocated to Unit 7 - ASPTEA at a grade 040. In March 1987 an “assignment” was
established at a middle manager level, grade 840 and positions were transitioned to
this level over time through attrition. By 1992, all positions had been transitioned and
the original base classification was modified from Unit 7 - ASPTEA, grade 040 to the
middle manager, grade 840. Subsequently all positions and employees were moved
from the assignment to the base classification.
Page 122
In February 2012, it was determined that having a middle manager (Engineering
Supervisor - grade 840) reporting to another middle manager (Deputy Director - grade
842) was an inefficient arrangement. A new “assignment” was established out of the
middle manager level and allocated to Unit 7 at grade 041. Over time, all positions
were moved to this assignment.
Current State
There are five employees in the “assignment” Engineering Supervisor*U7, grade 041.
None of these employees have ever been in the base classification from which this
assignment is associated. However, because they are in an assignment, they have
rights back to the base classification. Furthermore, the base classification (840) and
the assignment (041) have the same job description.
Conclusion
The recommended course of action is to follow the same methodology employed in
1992, effectively reversing the previous strategy and reestablishing a middle manager
level at a grade 840 to serve as a career progression step toward the Deputy Director
level at 842.
The base classification will be modified to reflect the allocation to Unit 7, and the grade
maintained at 041. This is consistent with the employees’ job history, so there will be
no negative impact to the employees when they are reverted from the assignment to
the base classification. Once those transactions have been processed, the assignment
level will be abolished.
A new classification will be established at the middle manager level, grade 840. Thus,
the association of the assignment will be separated, and each classification will have
unique and separate job descriptions.
Financial Impact
There is no budgetary impact associated with these actions.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This action was reviewed and recommended for approval by Human Resources
Committee 610 on Aug. 10, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the Human
Resources Department.
Page 123
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
S-47932)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with: Thrive Consultancy, Inc., Central Arizona Land Trust, NxT Horizon
LLC, Lehr Innovations, LLC, and Tiger Mountain Foundation, to provide food
assistance to vulnerable populations impacted by COVID-19; offer economic and
business opportunities to establish new food businesses; and to preserve urban
farmland in Phoenix. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the
City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. Funding is available through
the City’s allocation of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding received from
the federal government and is under the City’s Phoenix Resilient Food System
category of the ARPA Strategic Plan approved by the Mayor and Council. The
aggregate value of the agreements will not exceed $1,601,000.
Summary
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Office of Environmental Programs (OEP)
developed a food assistance plan to address the food needs of vulnerable populations
and communities impacted by COVID-19. The plan provides: 1) access to healthy
foods for impacted populations; 2) infrastructure assistance regarding transportation
and delivery with a focus on home delivery; 3) support for food banks, food pantries,
and community agencies; 4) support for increased local food production; and 5)
business and employment opportunities throughout the food system spectrum.
The following programs will provide economic and business opportunities for residents
and empower residents to grow healthy food in their own backyards to improve health,
promote physical activity, and decrease food insecurity and hunger, and preserve
urban farmland in Phoenix.
Economic Development and Innovation
Worker Cooperative Sustainable Food System Business Incubator and Training
Program
Thrive Consultancy Inc. (Thrive) will provide training on sustainable cooperative food
entrepreneurship, including the operational, legal, financial, and marketing practices
for a cooperative food business. Thrive is an Arizona benefit corporation located in
Page 124
Phoenix that provides development services for businesses. Thrive will conduct
workshops to educate food business owners, investors, and other stakeholders about
the current state of the cooperative economy and the importance of a supportive
worker cooperative business infrastructure. The 10-week training will be held in two
cohorts for up to 50 individuals in a hybrid virtual/in-person format. Four tailored events
and workshops will be held to educate on the cooperative business model. Thrive will
serve as a subrecipient and will administer, manage, and develop the program.
Local Food Consumption/Production
The Backyard Food Production Pilot Project aka Backyard Garden Program
This program will empower residents to grow healthy food in their own backyards to
improve health, promote physical activity, decrease food insecurity and hunger, and
potentially decrease their food budget. The OEP will use the expertise of three local
organizations experienced in growing food. Lehr Innovations, LLC, NxT Horizon LLC
(NxT) and Tiger Mountain Foundation (TMF) will serve as subrecipients and will
administer and manage their respective gardening system programs. Lehr Innovations,
LLC is a Phoenix-based organization founded by Ed Williams, who invented the
Linking Ecosystems and Hardware for Regeneration (LEHR) Gardens system as a
sustainable, regenerative growing method for busy urban lifestyles. NxT is a Phoenix-
based organization founded by Dr. George Brooks Jr., a nationally recognized
aquaponics expert. TMF is a Phoenix-based nonprofit organization whose mission is to
empower communities to better themselves through cultivating gardens.
Lehr Innovations, LLC, NxT, and TMF will install backyard gardens using aquaponics,
growing produce and protein (fish and shrimp), and raised beds. The systems chosen
are cost-effective and water-efficient growing methods and suitable for the Phoenix
climate and growing seasons. These systems will be installed for up to 90 residents
living in the South Mountain Village Planning and the Maryvale Village Planning areas.
Applicants for the program must meet eligibility criteria, such as, low income; living
within the program’s geographic boundary; with preference for applicants living in food
deserts and applicants that are Black, Indigenous or People of Color.
Homeowners or renters (with written permission from landlord) will be provided with
the gardening system of their choice, which includes system installation, including
equipment, materials, supplies and labor, and gardening training throughout the 12-
month program. Program outreach materials, application, and training materials will be
provided in English and Spanish.
Lehr Innovations, LLC, NxT, and TMF will serve as subrecipients and will administer
and manage their respective gardening system programs with details on their
responsibilities, schedule, and reporting requirements in the agreement. Below is a
Page 125
brief description of each gardening system:
· LEHR Gardens - Lehr Innovations, LLC will provide installation of up to 30 LEHR
Gardens (raised bed system), including all materials, supplies, equipment, and
labor and will provide on-call training, maintenance, and repair services for 12
months;
· Aquaponics Victory Gardens - NxT will provide installation of up to 30 aquaponics
systems, including all materials, supplies, equipment and labor, 10 hours of
education per system plus on-call training, maintenance, and repair services for 12
months.; and
· Tiger Eye Gardens - TMF will provide up to 30 Tiger Eye Gardens (raised bed
system), including all materials, supplies, equipment, and labor, on-call training,
maintenance, and repair services for 12 months.
Farmland Preservation Program
Central Arizona Land Trust (CALT) will serve as a subrecipient and will administer and
manage the program to conserve urban farmland within the boundaries of the City of
Phoenix through conservation easements. CALT is a community-based, Arizona
nonprofit dedicated to protecting open space, wildlife habitat, and working farms and
ranches in perpetuity by working with private landowners to develop conservation
easements. CALT will conduct outreach for the program, manage contractors providing
services to support placement of conservation easements on qualified properties, and
will award grant funding to eligible entities for placement of conservation easements on
qualified properties. CALT will coordinate with City staff to develop eligibility criteria.
Based on the services required and available budget, a maximum of three
conservation easements are anticipated for this program.
The Office of Environmental Programs will assist Thrive, Lehr Innovations, LLC, NxT,
TMF, and CALT to oversee the agreements and coordinate any needed services, such
as program outreach and recruitment.
Procurement Information
Services may be procured, as needed, in accordance with Administrative Regulation
3.10 to implement and administer programs intended to prevent, prepare for, respond
to, and recover from the COVID-19 national pandemic.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement will begin on or about Sept. 20, 2021 and continue through
Oct. 31, 2022. Agreements may be extended based on continuous need and available
funding, which may be exercised by the City Manager, or his designee.
Page 126
Financial Impact
Funding for these programs will not exceed $1,601,000. There is no impact to the
General Fund. Funding is available through the City’s allocation of the American
Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding received from the federal government and is under
the City’s Phoenix Resilient Food System category of the ARPA Strategic Plan
approved by Mayor and Council.
The allocation breakdown is as follows:
Thrive Consultancy Inc. - $200,000;
Lehr Innovations, LLC - $118,000;
NxT Horizon LLC - $145,000;
Tiger Mountain Foundation - $138,000; and
Central Arizona Land Trust - $1 million.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved the ARPA Strategic Plan on June 8, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Office of
Environmental Programs.
Page 127
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Depot at Phoenix Public Library Long-Term Laptop/WiFi Hotspot Lending
Program (Ordinance S-47937)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with Arizona Department of Education to offer a long-
term laptop and WiFi hotspot lending program to College Depot at Phoenix Public
Library students. The term of the contract will begin on or about Oct. 1, 2021 and end
on June 30, 2022, with one option to extend through June 30, 2023. The aggregate
value of the contract will not exceed $853,000. Further request authorization for the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. Funding is one-time monies
from the Arizona Department of Education. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Summary
In the spring of 2021, Phoenix Public Library began offering a laptop and Wi-Fi hotspot
lending program with a fleet of 425 laptops and 200 Wi-Fi hotspots, which are lent to
library customers for three-week lending periods. To better serve students in need of
longer lending periods, Arizona Department of Education, City of Phoenix, and
Phoenix Public Library proposes an expansion to double the number of laptops and Wi
-Fi hotspots available. With funds totaling $853,000 and allocated to College Depot at
Phoenix Public Library from the Arizona Department of Education, Phoenix Public
Library will purchase an additional 425 laptops/200 Wi-Fi hotspots and specifically
reserve the additional devices to meet the needs of students receiving assistance from
College Depot at Phoenix Public Library. College Depot staff will identify students in
need and provide allocated devices for semester-long and summer-long lending
periods.
Contract Term
The term of the contract will begin on or about Oct. 1, 2021 and end on June 30, 2022,
with an option to extend the term through June 30, 2023, which may be exercised by
the City Manager or his designee.
Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $853,000. Funding is one-time
monies from the Arizona Department of Education. There is no impact to the General
Fund.
Page 128
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.
Page 129
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Recommendations (Ordinance S-47926)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into 2021-22
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) agreements for Public Facility projects
for an amount not to exceed $383,241. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item over the life of the agreements. These
agreements will be funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG).
Summary
On May 5, 2021 City Council approved the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP)
for CDBG funded Public Facility projects for Fiscal Year 2021-22. The Public Facility
Program provides nonprofits an opportunity to apply for funding to implement facility
improvements on nonprofit-owned buildings, that are open to the general public as a
public facility and will provide critical programs and services serving low- and moderate
-income communities in Phoenix. On June 2, 2021 an RFP was issued by the
Neighborhood Services Department and closed on July 1, 2021. Six responsive
applications, requesting more than $803,000, were received. Applications were
evaluated and scored by the Community Development (CD) Review Committee; an 11
-member committee appointed by the Mayor.
Each proposal was rated on a 1,000-point scale:
· Project description/need (250 points);
· Project feasibility (250 points);
· Project budget (250 points) and;
· Track record and capacity (250 points).
In August 2021, the CD Review Committee reviewed the combined scores and invited
the six nonprofit organizations to make a brief presentation on their proposed projects.
The proposal presentations were ranked individually by the committee. Funding
recommendations were developed based on the overall committee's final ranking.
Page 130
The following list identifies the three nonprofit organizations the CD Review Committee
recommended funding for a total of $383,241.
CDBG Public Facility Grant Program Awardees
· ACCEL - Phoenix ADA Enhancements: $150,000
· Civitan Foundation, Inc. - Civitan MIDTOWN Construction Project: $150,000
· VALLEYLIFE - Prep Kitchen to Prepare Healthy Meals to Reduce Illness in Group
Homes: $83,241
Contract Term
Contract terms will commence on or about Sept. 8, 2021 through Oct. 31, 2022.
Financial Impact
These programs are funded through CDBG funding. There is no financial impact to the
General Fund.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The 2021-22 CDBG Public Facility Request for Proposals was recommended for
approval by the Land Use and Livability Subcommittee on April 21, 2021, by a vote of
3-0 and approved by the City Council on May 5, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Neighborhood
Services Department.
Page 131
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
47925)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to purchase various golf
merchandise for direct resale to the public at pro shops located at Cave Creek,
Encanto, Palo Verde and Aguila golf courses. Items may include, but are not limited to,
golf balls, range balls, golf clothing, hats, golf clubs and golf shoes. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The two-
year aggregate value will not exceed $1 million, with an estimated annual expenditure
of $500,000. There is no impact to the General Fund. Revenue from the resale of
merchandise at the pro shops funds the expenditure request.
Summary
The City operates four municipal golf courses, each of which has a pro shop where
golfers have the ability to purchase golf merchandise such as golf balls, clothing and
shoes. To supply the pro shops, the Parks and Recreation Department purchases
merchandise for resale directly from more than 190 various wholesale and specialty
manufacturers to obtain discounts and the lowest prices. Vendor pricing is based on a
variety of factors and changes seasonally; therefore, a low-bid process is not suitable
for the purchase of golf merchandise.
Financial Impact
Payment authority in the amount of $1 million for a two-year period, from Sept. 8,
2021, through Sept. 7, 2023, is requested. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Revenue from the resale of merchandise at the pro shops funds the Parks and
Recreation Department's purchase of golf merchandise.
Location
Cave Creek Golf Course - 15202 N. 19th Ave.
Encanto Golf Course - 2775 N. 15th Ave.
Palo Verde Golf Course - 6215 N. 15th Ave.
Aguila Golf Course - 8440 S. 35th Ave.
Council Districts: 3, 4, 5 and 7
Page 132
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Page 133
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the sale of Police
canine Zeus to Det. Pablo De Santiago for $1.00. Currently, Det. De Santiago is
assigned to the Commercial Narcotic Interdiction Unit (CNIU) and has requested to
retire and purchase his assigned canine Zeus in accordance with A.R. 4.21. Det. De
Santiago will be transferring out of CNIU in the near future.
Summary
Canine Zeus is 9.5 years old and has served the Phoenix Police Department and the
citizens of Phoenix with unwavering bravery and distinction in his capacity as a police
service dog for over seven years.
This request is for the authorization of the sale of Police canine Zeus for $1.00. Det.
De Santiago has requested to retire and purchase canine Zeus and has agreed to
accept full responsibility and liability for him until his death.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Police
Department.
Page 134
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Resource Officers (Ordinance S-47930)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the current
ordinance (S-47537) with various school districts for the placement of School
Resource Officers (SROs). Authorization of the amendment will add the Tempe Union
High School District to the 2021-22 list of school districts. Further request authorization
for the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this item.
Summary
The Police Department has entered into Intergovernmental Agreements with various
school districts in the past to assist with the cost of SROs deployed in schools.
Funding for these SROs is provided through partnerships with the Arizona Department
of Education and individual school districts. Through this partnership, school district
funds reimburse the City for 75 percent of the SRO's salary, while the remaining 25
percent is paid by the City.
The amended ordinance will add the Tempe Union High School District. All other terms
will remain unchanged.
Contract Term
The terms of these agreements are one year, with varying start and end dates to
coincide with each school's 2021-22 school year.
Financial Impact
Cost to the City is 25 percent match for the SRO salary and fringe benefits.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ordinance S-47537 was approved by the City Council at the May 5, 2021 meeting.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Police
Department.
Page 135
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
contracts with: Lincoln Constructors, Inc. and Amrep Manufacturing Company, LLC, for
as-needed lubrication services for fleet vehicles and equipment. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. This
contract will have an aggregate amount of $1,305,000.
Summary
The Public Works Department is responsible for the weekly lubrication of over 300
pieces of equipment. The majority of this equipment includes solid waste refuse trucks
consisting of automated side loaders, rear loaders, front loaders, and tippers with all
equipment having strict requirements required by the manufacturer for scheduled
lubrication intervals. This contract will be used on an as-needed basis to meet
operational demands to manage time-sensitive requests and workload in the event
staff is unable to perform the lubrication service.
Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid (IFB) 22-FSD-011 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. The Public Works Department received two bids, both being deemed
responsive and responsible. Due to the operational need for coverage at multiple
service centers on multiple days, both vendors are being recommended for award with
the below bids being evaluated as included:
Lincoln Constructors, Inc.: $457
Amrep Manufacturing Co, LLC: $530
Contract Term
This contract will begin on or about Oct. 1, 2021 with an initial one-year contract term,
and four option years to be exercised in increments of up to one year, for a total
contract term of five years.
Financial Impact
This contract will have an estimated $261,000 annual expenditure, with a total
aggregate amount of $1,305,000 over the life of the contract. Funding is available in
Page 136
the Public Works Department's budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.
Page 137
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Requirements Contract (Ordinance S-47910)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Clean Bin Heroes, LLC., to provide container yard maintenance services for the
Public Works Department. The contract term is for one year with up to four option
years starting on or about Jan. 1, 2022. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the agreement will not
exceed $750,000.
Summary
This agreement will provide services to the Public Works Department, Solid Waste
Division to maintain up to four yards that house various sizes of residential containers.
Currently more than 700,000 containers are in service. The vendor will be required to
maintain the yards and clean, wash, and repair containers as needed to maintain quick
turnaround times for staff to place them back out in service. Also, the vendor will
maintain inventory of the containers and stack and sort the containers to either be
covered under warranty or to recycled due to the lifecycle of the container or it being
beyond repairs.
Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid (IFB) 22-SW-001 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. There were five offers received by the Public Works Department
Procurement Services on May 12, 2021. The offers were evaluated based on price,
responsiveness to all specifications, terms and conditions and responsibility to provide
the required services. One offer was deemed non-responsive. Based on the bid
submittal, the following offers were received.
Clean Bin Heroes, LLC: $143.25
Wash Monster, LLC: $144.00
Dirty Trash Bins, LLC: $152.25
Fleet Genius, LLC: $177.65
Public Works recommends that the offer from Clean Bin Heroes, LLC be accepted as
the lowest-priced, responsive, and responsible offer.
Page 138
Contract Term
The initial agreement term is for one year beginning on or about Jan 1, 2022.
Provisions of the agreement may include an option to extend the term up to four years,
to be taken in one-year increments, which may be exercised by the City Manager or
his designee.
Financial Impact
The total agreement value will not exceed $750,000. Funding is available in the Public
Works Department’s budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.
Page 139
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Services (Ordinance S-47914)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
D.R. McNatty & Associates Inc. to provide discovery, design and implementation, and
ongoing, long-term support for services of Oracle Primavera Unifier system for a
Citywide Construction Project Management Information System (CCPMIS) for a five-
year period. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total amount of the contract will not exceed $2,018,200.
Summary
A City audit identified the need for standardization and improvement of construction
project management information systems. Existing systems like PROMIS, CM13, and
Primavera P6, do not adequately support the business needs; hence a new solution is
required to provide City staff and contractors adequate tools to capture, plan, maintain
and manage projects effectively from inception through the life of the asset(s), or until
the asset(s) no longer exist. In certain cases, the lifecycle is perpetual. This new
solution will implement an enterprise-level system, Oracle Primavera Unifier, and
provide portfolio, program, and project management across the organization for the
entire lifecycle of Citywide construction projects to mitigate risk and ensure appropriate
oversight. The City will be using a cloud-based solution for its Citywide Construction
Project Management tool.
The Aviation Department has successfully used Oracle's Primavera Unifier solution to
track and manage all construction projects regardless of funding source, and tenant
improvement projects for the past 13 years. The Street Transportation and Water
Services departments desire to leverage the same technology platform to build and
support a Citywide construction project management solution.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
Due to the unique nature of the services required, the City chose to conduct an Agile
procurement process. A Letter of Intent (LOI) 63-2105 was posted on the City of
Page 140
Phoenix solicitation website in accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10. The
LOI was emailed to 627 technology firms.
Six firms responded to the LOI for Implementation Services. A six-member panel
evaluated and scored the proposals and demonstrations based on the following criteria
with total points ranging from 0-1,000:
· Company Qualifications and Experience (0-250 points);
· References (0-50 points);
· Method of Approach (0-250 points);
· Interview Questions (0-300 points); and
· Pricing (0-150 points).
Offeror Selected for Award
D.R. McNatty 906 points
Additional Proposers
Enstoa 880 points
Anser 855 points
Foresee 845 points
Accenture 617 points
C3IT 460 points
The Information Technology, Street Transportation, and Water Services Directors
recommend the offer from D.R. McNatty be accepted as the most responsive and
responsible offeror for the implementation.
Contract Term
The five-year contract shall begin on or about Aug. 26, 2021.
Financial Impact
The total contract amount is anticipated to be $2,018,200 over the life of the contract.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation and Water Services departments’
Capital Improvement Program budgets.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua, Karen Peters and
Toni Maccarone, and the Street Transportation, Water Services and Information
Technology Services departments.
Page 141
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with the seven selected consultants listed in Attachment A, to provide
Asbestos and Lead On-Call Consulting services citywide for the Street Transportation
Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreements
as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for
services will not exceed $5,250,000.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. This authorization excludes any
transaction involving an interest in real property.
Summary
The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing Asbestos and Lead services
that include, but are not limited to: survey of designated facilities and/or facility
components for asbestos containing materials (ACM); production of National
Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants compliant surveys and reports,
compliant asbestos survey reports in accordance with Asbestos Hazard Emergency
Response Act protocol; Housing and Urban Development type lead paint surveys and
other related environmental services; timely laboratory analysis to identify the
presence type and extent of ACM and lead paint; development of plans, specifications
and computer aided design and drafting drawings; construction administration services
to manage abatement activities; air monitoring; monitoring and evaluation of contractor
performance; final clearance; and other project related services as requested by the
City.
Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Page 142
section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Thirteen firms submitted
proposals and are listed in Attachment A.
Contract Term
The term of each agreement is two years, with an option to extend for one additional
year, or up to $750,000, whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated
into the agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and
work may extend past the termination of the agreement. No additional changes may
be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for each of the On-Call consultants will not exceed $750,000,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services will not
exceed $5,250,000.
Funding is available in the various department's Capital Improvement Program and
Operating budgets. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to the issuance of any On-Call task order of $100,000 or more.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 143
ATTACHMENT A
Selected Firms
Rank 1: Adams and Wendt, Inc.
Rank 2: Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Rank 3: Dominion Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Rank 4: ATC Group Services LLC
Rank 5: Western Technologies, Inc.
Rank 6: Partner Assessment Corporation dba Partner Engineering and
Science
Rank 7: Stearns, Conrad and Schmidt, Consulting Engineers, Inc. dba SCS
Engineers
Additional Proposers
Rank 8: FM Group Inc.
Rank 9: Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical and Environmental Sciences
Consultants Inc.
Rank 10: Sevee & Maher Engineers, Inc.
Rank 11: AZTEC Engineering Group Inc
Rank 12: Arizona Environmental Specialist L.L.C.
Rank 13: Protex The PT Xperts, LLC
Page 144
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Services (Ordinance S-47920)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Oracle America, Inc. under Oracle Master Agreement 142562-AR-001, to provide
licensing services for Oracle Primavera Unifier system for the Citywide Construction
Project Management Information System (CCPMIS) for a five-year period. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
total value of the contract will not exceed $3,565,179.
Summary
A City audit identified the need for standardization and improvement of construction
project management information systems. Existing systems like PROMIS, CM13, and
Primavera P6, do not adequately support the business needs; hence a new solution is
required to provide City staff and contractors adequate tools to capture, plan, maintain
and manage projects effectively from inception through the life of the asset(s), or until
the asset(s) no longer exist. In certain cases, the lifecycle is perpetual. This new
solution will implement an enterprise-level system, Oracle Primavera Unifier, and
provide portfolio, program, and project management across the organization for the
entire lifecycle of Citywide construction projects to mitigate risk and ensure appropriate
oversight. The City will be using a cloud-based solution for its Citywide Construction
Project Management tool.
The Aviation Department has successfully used Oracle's Primavera Unifier solution to
track and manage all construction projects regardless of funding source, and tenant
improvement projects for the past 13 years. The Street Transportation and Water
Services departments desire to leverage the same technology platform to build and
support a Citywide construction project management solution.
This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.
Procurement Information
Due to the unique nature of the services required, the City chose to conduct an Agile
procurement process. A Letter of Intent (LOI) 63-2105 which included Licensing and
Page 145
Implementation services was posted on the City of Phoenix solicitation website in
accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10. The LOI was emailed to 627
technology firms.
One firm responded to the LOI for Licensing services. A six-member panel evaluated
and scored the proposal based on the following criteria with total points ranging from 0
-1,000:
· Company Qualifications and Experience (0-300 points);
· References (0-300 points);
· Pricing (0-300 points); and
· Acceptance of Terms and Conditions and the City’s Conflict of Interest & Solicitation
Transparency Disclosure Form (0-100 points).
Offeror Selected for Award
Oracle America, Inc. 750 points
The Information Technology Services, Street Transportation, and Water Directors
recommend the offer from Oracle America Inc. be accepted as the most responsive
and responsible offer or for the licensing services.
Contract Term
The five-year contract shall begin on or about Aug. 26, 2021.
Financial Impact
The total value is anticipated to be $3,565,179 over the life of the contract.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department’s Operating and Capital
Improvement Program and Water Services Department's Capital Improvement
Program budgets.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Oracle Master Agreement 142562-AR-001 (Ordinance S-
47326) on Feb. 17, 2021.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua, Karen Peters and
Toni Maccarone, and the Street Transportation, Water Services and Information
Technology Services departments.
Page 146
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Improvements (REBID) - Design-Bid-Build Services - ST85100400 (Ordinance S-
47928)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept Combs Construction
Company, Inc. as the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to enter
into an agreement with Combs Construction Company, Inc. for Design-Bid-Build
Services for the Pinnacle Peak Road: 45th to 35th avenues Paving and Storm Drain
Improvements (REBID) project. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed
$10,002,554.90.
Summary
The purpose of this project is to construct new roadway paving and storm drain
improvements on Pinnacle Peak Road from 45th Avenue to just west of 35th Avenue,
and to construct a new storm drain on 43rd Avenue extending north from Pinnacle
Peak Road to Misty Willow Lane.
On June 20, 2018, the City entered into Agreement 147888 to provide Design-Bid-
Build Services for the Pinnacle Peak Road: 45th to 35th avenues Paving and Storm
Drain Improvements project. This agreement was terminated on Nov. 1, 2019 for
convenience.
Combs Construction Company, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to: subgrade
preparation and constructing new asphaltic concrete roadway pavement; new concrete
curb and gutter, ADA compliant concrete sidewalk, curb returns, concrete driveway
entrances; new concrete box culvert crossings, concrete wing walls, concrete
headwalls with brick veneer facing, concrete channel lining, new storm drain mainline
pipe, storm drain manholes, storm drain connector pipes and catch basins; trenching
for underground street light circuits; installation of new traffic signal poles, signal
equipment, and traffic signal conduits; installation of new LED street lights and LED
luminaries; new landscaping and irrigation system, decomposed granite landscape
ground cover; and other required work items.
Page 147
Procurement Information
The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Five bids were received on Aug. 17,
2021 and the three lowest bids were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for
review to determine subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in
demonstrating responsiveness to Small Business Enterprise program requirements.
The Opinion of Probable Cost and the three lowest responsive, responsible bidders are
listed below:
Opinion of Probable Cost: $9,000,722.68
Combs Construction Company, Inc.: $10,002,554.90
Granite Construction Company: $10,900,510.00
J. Banicki Construction, Inc.: $11,672,357.32
Although the bid exceeds the Opinion of Probable Cost by more than 10 percent, it has
been determined the bid represents a fair and reasonable price for the required work
scope. Additionally, the bid award amount is within the total budget for this project.
The reason for the variance from the Opinion of Probable Cost to the lowest,
responsive, responsible bid is due to the large diameter pipe and light poles; both
products have long lead times and steel prices have soared recently.
Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 365 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for Combs Construction Company, Inc. will not exceed
$10,002,554.90, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Agreement 147888 (Ordinance S-44772 on June 20, 2018)
Page 148
Location
Pinnacle Peak Road from 45th to 35th avenues.
Council District: 1
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.
Page 149
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Advertising Structures in Right of Way (Ordinance S-47931)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to issue or amend existing
revocable permits authorized by Agreement 131850 with the Jefferson Street Signage
District, LLC dba Legends Entertainment District (Legends), allowing special
conditions for sign structures used for off-site (off-premise) advertising that encroach in
public right-of-way. Further request exception to Phoenix City Code 3-8 for these
revocable permits to allow off-site (off-premise) advertising on the sign structures
encroaching into the public right-of-way.
Summary
In 2011, City Council authorized, via Ordinance S-37850, entering into Agreement
131850 with Legends Entertainment District (Legends), which is part of the greater
Jefferson Street Master Sign Plan approved by the Planning and Development
Department in 2009. As part of this Agreement, Legends is responsible for the
operation and maintenance of static billboards, LED video boards, and unique custom
3D signs, and marketing and sales advertising for these signs. In addition, Legends is
required to provide revenue sharing to the City and to adhere to the City's approved
Advertising Guidelines.
With a few exceptions, Phoenix City Code 3-8 prohibits advertising in public right-of-
way. The signs operated and maintained by Legends are mostly mounted on
structures on private or City property, through a license agreement, and are completely
outside of public right-of-way. However, a number of these signs are mounted on
structures on private or City property that encroach into public right-of-way. If
approved, the signs that encroach into public right-of-way would be granted an
exception to Phoenix City Code 3-8 to allow off-site (off-premise) advertising.
The six impacted properties are listed below:
· 601 E. Washington St.;
· 201 E. Washington St.;
· 101 E. Washington St.;
· 11 W. Washington St.;
· 50 W. Washington St.; and
Page 150
· 333 E. Jefferson St.
Financial Impact
Permit holders would be required to pay the annual fee associated with the issuance of
a revocable permit for an encroachment in public right-of-way. The City would continue
to participate in revenue sharing from its agreement with Legends.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Legends Entertainment District Agreement 131850
(Ordinance S-37850) on May 18, 2011.
Location
The Legends Entertainment District encompasses several blocks of downtown
Phoenix along Jefferson Street from 1st Avenue to 7th Street.
Council Districts: 7 and 8
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.
Page 151
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 148595 with Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation, dba MetTel Inc., to
provide additional funding to the contract. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures
included in this amendment will not exceed $794,000.
Summary
This contract provides telematic hardware and software for tracking vehicles and
obtaining essential data for vehicle maintenance, routing and customer inquiries for the
Public Works and Water Services departments.
The purpose of this amendment is to provide additional funding to the contract
because the volume of City vehicles using the services has increased beyond the
initial estimates and the existing spending authority is now anticipated to be depleted
at the end of Fiscal Year 2022. It is necessary to request additional funding to maintain
this software and continue to gather data that is essential for continuity of operations of
both departments for the remaining term of the contract.
Contract Term
The contract term will remain unchanged, with potential options to extend ending on
June 30, 2023.
Financial Impact
The initial authorization for Automated Vehicle Locator Services contract was for an
expenditure not-to-exceed $1.75 million. This amendment will increase the
authorization for the contract by an additional $794,000, for a new total not-to-exceed
contract value of $2,544,000.
Funding for this amendment is available in the Public Works and Water Services
departments' budgets.
Page 152
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Automated Vehicle Locator Service Contract 148595
(Ordinance S-44634) on June 6, 2018.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
and Water Services departments.
Page 153
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
47919)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Wastewater Solids Management to provide digester tank cleaning services for
cleaning the interior of different size digester tanks and pumping the contents to the
designated digester cleaning facility beds. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The agreement will not exceed
$593,600.
Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide digester tank cleaning services for
different size digester tanks at the Water Services Department Wastewater Treatment
Plants.
Wastewater Solids Management services include, but are not limited to: pumping the
contents to the designated digester cleaning facility beds, lagoons or digester drains,
back flush heated sludge lines, pump, heat exchanger, bottom draw-off legs, mixing
pump(s) and mixing lines, and grit cleaning line with impure water, and to provide all
spotting during the loading and unloading of equipment and materials.
Procurement Information
The recommendation was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process in
accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10.
Four vendors submitted bids and are listed below. All bids were found to be responsive
and responsible.
Selected Bidder:
Wastewater Solids Management: $359,200
Other Bidders:
Denali Water Solutions: $702,800
Riley Industrial Services: $1,456,180
Olcese Construction Co: $1,524,000
Page 154
Agreement Term
The agreement will begin on or about Nov. 1, 2021, for a seven-year term with no
options to extend.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for Wastewater Solids Management will not exceed $593,600.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating budget.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 155
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with DCS Delivery to provide courier services for transporting laboratory samples.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of this agreement will not exceed $95,000.
Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide courier services on an as-needed basis.
DCS Delivery's services include but are not limited to transport of laboratory water
samples to various Citywide locations. The contract provides scheduled and
unscheduled deliveries on weekdays, weekends and City holidays.
Procurement Information
The recommendations were made using a Request for Quote procurement process in
accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.
Three vendors submitted bids and are listed below. Two bids were found to be
responsive and responsible.
Selected Bidder
DCS Delivery: $17,428.86
Other Bidders
SWABS AZ, Inc.: $30,601
Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about Oct. 1, 2021, for a five-year aggregate term with
no options to extend.
Financial Impact
The agreement value for DCS Delivery will not exceed $95,000.
Funding is available in the Water Services Department’s budget.
Page 156
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.
Page 157
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Commission Action - PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7 - Northeast Corner of 59th Avenue and
Lower Buckeye Road
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the Planning
Commission recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on matters
heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on May 19, 2021 and the Planning Commission
on Aug. 5, 2021. This ratification requires formal action only.
Summary
Application: PHO-1-21--Z-67-95-7
Existing Zoning: A-1
Acreage: 1.7
Applicant: Taylor C. Earl, Earl and Curley, P.C.
Owner: Glenda D. Massey
Representative: Taylor C. Earl, Earl and Curley, P.C.
Proposal:
1. Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding minimum landscape adjacent to any public
street.
2. Modification of Stipulation 4 regarding general conformance to the site plan date
stamped November 20, 1995.
3. Technical corrections to Stipulations 2 and 5.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Village Planning Committee Recommendation: The Estrella Village Planning
Committee heard this case on May 18, 2021 and recommended approval, as
requested by the applicant by a vote of 5-0.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer heard this case on May 19, 2021 and took
the case under advisement. On June 3, 2021, the Planning Hearing Officer took the
case out from under advisement and recommended approval with modifications and
additional stipulations. See Attachment C (Staff Report) for the Planning Hearing
Officer recommended stipulations.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 5, 2021 and
Page 158
recommended approval, per the Planning Hearing Officer recommendation with
modifications by a vote of 8-0.
Location
Northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 5858 W. Lower Buckeye Road
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 159
Attachment A- Stipulations- PHO-1-21_Z-67-95-7
Location: Northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road
Stipulations:
1. That a minimum 30 foot landscape setback (as per Section 626 of the
Zoning Ordinance) be provided adjacent to any public street.
THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH
THE SITE PLAN DATE STAMPED AUGUST 5, 2021 AND ELEVATIONS
DATE STAMPED MARCH 25, 2021, EXCEPT WHERE THERE MAY BE
CONFLICTS WITH GENERAL ZONING ORDINANCE STANDARDS, AND
AS MODIFIED BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED
BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
A. A MINIMUM 30-FOOT LANDSCAPE SETBACK SHALL BE
PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ANY PUBLIC STREET LOWER
BUCKEYE ROAD.
2. That Lot lines, not on an abutting street shall provide a minimum 5-foot
wide landscaped area containing a minimum 15-gallon evergreen trees (or
other plant materials as approved by the PLANNING AND Development
Services Department) planted to a maximum of 20 feet on center or placed
in equivalent groupings.
3. That No outdoor storage shall be located within 100 feet of a public street
and storage shall be enclosed with a minimum six-foot high solid masonry
wall.
4. That development be in general conformance to the site plan dated
November 20, 1995.
4. A 10-FOOT PUBLIC MULTI-USE TRAIL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN A 30-FOOT EASEMENT PER THE TRAIL DETAIL IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL ALONG WEST
LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD AS APPROVED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT.
5. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A SHARED-USE PATH AND
EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF 59TH AVENUE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX STANDARD TRAIL
DETAILS AND AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PARKS AND
RECREATION DEPARTMENT.
6. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE ESTRELLA VILLAGE
ARTERIAL STREET LANDSCAPING PROGRAM, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
7. That The applicant shall dedicate the following right-of-way as approved by
Page 160
5. the PLANNING AND Development Services Department.
a. A 50-foot north half street for Lower Buckeye Road with a Type “B “
flair at the intersection of 59th Avenue. The applicant shall construct
the north half of Lower Buckeye Road with paving, curb, gutter,
sidewalk, street lights, landscaping and other incidentals, as
approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services
Department.
b. A 50-foot east half street for 59th Avenue with a Type “B “ flair at the
intersection of Lower Buckeye Road. The applicant shall construct
the east half of 59th Avenue with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk,
street lights, landscaping and other incidentals, as approved by the
PLANNING AND Development Services Department.
c. A 21-foot by 21-foot triangle at the northeast corner of 59th Avenue
and Lower Buckeye Road.
d. Sufficient right-of-way to accommodate a far-side busbay (Detail P-
1257) on 59th Avenue at Lower Buckeye Road.
e. Additional easements and right-of-way dedications may be required
by the PLANNING AND Development Services Department at the
time of preliminary site plan approval.
8. THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEDICATE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND CONSTRUCT
ONE BUS BAY WITH AN ATTACHED BUS STOP PAD ALONG
NORTHBOUND 59TH AVENUE NORTH OF LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD.
THE BUS BAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO CITY OF
PHOENIX STANDARD DETAIL P1256. THE ATTACHED BUS STOP PAD
SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO CITY OF PHOENIX
STANDARD DETAIL P1261 P1260 WITH A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 10 FEET.
THE BUS STOP PAD SHALL BE SPACED FROM THE INTERSECTION OF
59TH AVENUE AND LOWER BUCKEYE ROAD ACCORDING TO CITY OF
PHOENIX STANDARD DETAIL P1258. TREES SHALL BE PLACED TO
PROVIDE MINIMUM 50% SHADE COVERAGE TO THE BUS STOP PAD
AT FULL MATURITY.
9. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX ARCHAEOLOGY
OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE I DATA TESTING
AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING, LANDSCAPE
SALVAGE, AND/OR GRADING APPROVAL.
10. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON REVIEW OF
THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING, THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A QUALIFIED
ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA RECOVERY
Page 161
EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT
PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.
11. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED
DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER SHALL IMMEDIATELY
CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT
RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY, NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST,
AND ALLOW TIME FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY
ASSESS THE MATERIALS.
Page 162
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Corner of 19th Avenue and Baseline Road
Plat: 200582
Project: 06-1529
Name of Plat: Courtyards at Madison Ranch Amended
Owner: Courtyards at Madison Ranch HOA and Nineteen Commons, LLC
Engineer: Sunrise Engineering, Inc.
Request: A 152 Lot Residential Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: August 9, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only
Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public. This plat and the resolution of abandonment for ABND 210032 must be
recorded concurrently with the Maricopa County Recorder on the same day, at the
same time. The sequence of recording to be followed is that the resolution is recorded
first, then the plat is recorded second.
Location
Generally located at the northeast corner of 19th Ave. and Baseline Road.
Council District: 7
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 163
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Resolution 21955)
Abandonment: ABND 210018
Project: 19-31
Applicant: Noel Griemsmann, AICP; Snell & Wilmer LLP
Request: To abandon the 155-square-foot excess right-of-way located in the
northeastern corner of 164-57-023B.
Date of Decision/Hearing: May 13, 2021
Location
1720 East Camelback Road
Council District: 6
Financial Impact
A consideration fee also was collected as part of this abandonment in the amount of
$2,300.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 164
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(Resolution 21953)
Abandonment: ABND 210032
Project: 16-1529
Applicant: Nick Johnson, Sunrise Engineering Inc.
Request: All publicly dedicated easements within all tracts and lots 38, 39, 40, 153,
155, 156, 157, and 158 as shown on the Final Plat for “The Courtyards at Madison
Ranch”, Recorded in Book 973, Page 46, MCR; those dedicated within all Tracts as
shown on the Final Plat for “The Courtyards at Madison Ranch”, Recorded in Book
1326, Page 50, MCR.
Date of Decision/Hearing: June 30, 2021
Summary
The resolution of the abandonment and PLAT 200582 are to be recorded together with
the Maricopa County Recorder on the same day at the same time. The sequence of
recording to be followed is that the resolution is recorded first, then the plat is recorded
second.
Location
East of 19th Avenue at Park Street
Council District: 7
Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid. The purpose of this abandonment was to be able to
replat the development and rededicate the easements in slightly different locations.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 165
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
(McDowell Hotel PUD) - Northwest Corner of 12th Street and McDowell Road
(Ordinance G-6885)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-2 CNSPD (Intermediate Commercial, Coronado Neighborhood Special Planning
District) and P-1 CNSPD (Parking, Coronado Neighborhood Special Planning District)
to PUD CNSPD (Planned Unit Development, Coronado Neighborhood Special
Planning District) to allow a hotel and other commercial uses.
Summary
Current Zoning: C-2 CNSPD (1.13 acres) and P-1 CNSPD (0.46 acres)
Proposed Zoning: PUD CNSPD
Acreage: 1.59 acres
Proposed Use: Hotel and other commercial uses
Owner: 1144 McDowell Land, LLC
Applicant: Larry Lazarus, Lazarus & Silvyn, P.C.
Representative: Larry Lazarus, Lazarus & Silvyn, P.C.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on April 5, 2021
for information only. The Encanto Village Planning Committee heard this case on June
7, 2021 and recommended denial by a vote of 5-4.
PC Action:The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 5, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, with an additional
stipulation by a vote of 8-0.
Location
Northwest corner of 12th Street and McDowell Road
Council District: 4
Parcel Addresses: 1145 E. 12th St.; 1144, 1146, and 1148 E. McDowell Road; and
1135, 1137, and 1143 E. Almeria Road
Page 166
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 167
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(Z-43-20-4) FROM C-2 CNSPD (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL,
CORONADO NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIAL PLANNING DISTRICT)
AND P-1 CNSPD (PARKING, CORONADO NEIGHBORHOOD
SPECIAL PLANNING DISTRICT) TO PUD CNSPD (PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT, CORONADO NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIAL
PLANNING DISTRICT)
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 1.59-acre site located at the northwest
corner of 12th Street and McDowell Road, in a portion of Section 33 Township 2 North
and Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from
1.13 acres of “C-2 CNSPD” (Intermediate Commercial, Coronado Neighborhood Special
Planning District) and 0.46-acres of “P-1 CNSPD” (Parking, Coronado Neighborhood
Special Planning District) to PUD CNSPD (Planned Unit Development, Coronado
Neighborhood Special Planning District).
Page 168
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. An updated Development Narrative for McDowell Hotel PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped May 18, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations:
a. Front cover: Revise the date information on the cover page to add the
following:
Hearing Draft: May 18, 2021
City Council Adopted: TBD [Add Adoption Date]
b. Page 4 and Exhibits: Add an Exhibit 8 to include the renderings date
stamped August 4, 2021.
c. Page 8: Update Figure 2 to match the site plan date stamped August 4,
2021.
d. Page 14; Walkable Urban Code: Applications and Modifications Table:
Change the column header from “Column B: Standards for hotel use only”
to “Column B: Standards for hotel and medical office use only”
e. Page 14: Change “1303 General Site Development Standards” to “1304
General Site Development Standards”.
f. Page 15, 1305 Frontage Standards, Fence standards: Add an additional
bullet to include the following provision under the first bullet:
o Decorative screening or open fencing on top of solid walls shall be
limited to 66 inches, with a combined height not to exceed 78
inches.
g. Page 15; Walkable Urban Code: Applications and Modifications Table.
1306 Land Use Matrix in Column B: Add “Clinic, medical or dental;
laboratory, medical, dental or clinical; medical or dental office; per Section
1306 Land Use Matrix.”
Page 169
h. Page 20; Site; 1st Paragraph: Add the following language “proposals for
non-standard material in the public right-of-way shall require approval
from the Street Transportation Department”
2. The site shall be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped August
4, 2021 should a hotel use be developed on the site, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
3. The developer shall dedicate 35-feet of right-of-way for the north side of
McDowell Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
4. The developer shall dedicate a 10-foot sidewalk easement for the north half of
McDowell Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
5. The driveway along McDowell Road shall be restricted to three quarter access
per City of Phoenix standard detail, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department.
6. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
7. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
8. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.
9. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
10. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
11. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
Page 170
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
12. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
13. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of September
2021.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
Page 171
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Ed Zuercher City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 172
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-43-20-4
That part of Lot 16, Homewood Tract, according to Book 3 of Maps, page 26, records of
Maricopa County, Arizona described as follows:
Commencing at the South quarter corner of Section 33, Township 2 North, Range 3
East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence North 00 degrees 21 minutes 00 seconds East, along the North-South mid-
section line thereof, 33.00 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 16;
Thence continuing North 00 degrees 21 minutes 00 seconds East, along the aforesaid
East line, 2.50 feet;
Thence West, along a line 2.50 feet North of and parallel to the South line of Lot 16,
16.03 feet to the Point of Beginning;
Thence continuing West, along the North line of the South 2.50 feet of Lot 16, 164.27
feet (recorded) 164.28 feet (measured) to a point on the East line of the West 151.50
feet of Lot 16;
Thence North 00 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East, along the aforesaid East line
166.25 feet to the Southeast corner of the parcel described in Docket 890, page 260,
records of Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence South 89 degrees 52 minutes 00 seconds West, along the South line of said
parcel, 56.50 feet to the Southwest corner thereof, also being the East line of the West
95.00 feet of Lot 16;
Thence North 00 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East, along the West line of said
parcel and the East line of the West 95.00 feet of Lot 16, 121.40 feet (recorded) 121.45
feet (Measured) to a point on the South line of the North 337.00 feet of Lot 16;
Thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 00 seconds East, along said South line, 214.00
feet to the Northeast corner of parcel no. 1, as described in Recording No. 1983-
0123794, records of Maricopa County, Arizona;
Thence South 00 degrees 25 minutes 09 seconds East, along the East line of said
parcel and its Southerly prolongation, being the West right-of –way line of North 12th
Street, 287.98 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Except that part thereof described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the North line of the South 2.50 feet with a line
designated herein as line “A”, which extends from a point on the South line of Lot 16,
distant 16.00 feet West from the Southeast corner thereof to a point on the North line of
the South half, distant 20.24 feet West from the Northeast corner of the South half;
Page 173
Thence Northerly along said line “A”, 16.00 feet;
Thence Southwesterly to a point on the North line of the South 2.50 feet which is 16.00
feet West of the Point of Beginning, And
Except that part of Lot 16 bounded on the East by said Line “A”, on the North by the
South right-of-way Line of Almeria Road, as shown on the plat of the Subdivision of the
North 337 feet of lots 15 and 16, Homewood Tract according to Book 19 of Maps, page
34, records of Maricopa County, Arizona, and on the Southwest by the arc of a circular
curve concave Southwesterly, having a tangent of 12 feet and being tangent to said line
“A” and to the South right-of-way line; and
Except the portion described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the North line of the South 2.50 feet of Lot 16 with a
line, designated herein as Line “A” which extends from a point in the South line of lot 16
which is 16.00 feet West of the Southeast corner thereof to a point in the North line of
the South half of Lot 16 which is 20.24 West of the Northeast corner of said South half;
Thence Northerly along said Line “A”, 16.00 feet to the Point of Beginning;
Thence continuing Northerly, along said Line “A”, 1.00 feet;
Thence Southwesterly to a point in the North line of said south 2.50 feet which is 17.00
feet West of the Point of Commencement;
Thence East, along the last said North line, 1.00 feet;
Thence Northeasterly to the Point of Beginning.
Page 174
Page 175
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Approximately 600 Feet West of the Northwest Corner of 91st Avenue and Indian
School Road (Ordinance G-6888)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
PSC (Planned Shopping Center District) to C-2 (Intermediate Commercial District) to
allow commercial uses. This is a companion case to Z-SP-2-21-5 and should be heard
first, followed by Z-SP-2-21-5.
Summary
Current Zoning: PSC
Proposed Zoning: C-2
Acreage: 4.99 acres
Proposed Use: Commercial uses
Owner: Prime Storage West Phoenix Land, LLC
Applicant: Neil Feaser, RKAA Architects Inc.
Representative: Thomas J. Richardson, EVP Construction
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on July 14,
2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-1-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 5, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Maryvale Village Planning Committee, by a vote of 7-
0.
Location
Approximately 600 feet west of the northwest corner of 91st Avenue and Indian School
Road
Council District: 5
Parcel Addresses: 9210 W. Indian School Road
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 176
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-21-21-5) FROM PSC (PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER
DISTRICT) TO C-2 (INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 4.99-acre site located approximately 600 feet
west of the northwest corner of 91st Avenue and Indian School Road in a portion of
Section 21, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit
“A”, is hereby changed from “PSC” (Planned Shopping Center District) to “C-2”
(Intermediate Commercial District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
Page 177
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped April 19, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations and approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
2. All elevations of the buildings shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in
window size and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department
3. The sidewalk along Indian School Road shall be detached with a landscape
strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent
Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and shall include minimum 2-inch
caliper shade trees planted a minimum of 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings along both sides of the sidewalk, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work
with the Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
4. Perimeter walls adjacent to Indian School Road shall include material and
textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative
element, such as tile or stamped designs, and be compatible with the existing
wall adjacent to Indian School Road on the property to the west, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
5. The north landscape setback shall be planted with a minimum 3-inch caliper
trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
6. A minimum of four inverted-U bicycle spaces for guests or employees shall be
provided on site and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
7. The developer shall dedicate 55-feet of right-of-way for the north side of Indian
School Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
8. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
Page 178
9. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances, bus stop pads, and public sidewalks, using the most direct
route for pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
10. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
11. Trees shall be placed to provide 75 percent shade coverage on all pedestrian
pathways and sidewalks at full maturity. Shade structures may be used to meet
the shade requirement in places where trees are unable to be located, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of September,
2021.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
Page 179
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Ed Zuercher City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 180
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-21-21-5
The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Maricopa, State of
Arizona, and is described as follows:
THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING IN W INDIAN SCHOOL ROAD
Page 181
Page 182
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Approximately 600 Feet West of the Northwest Corner of 91st Avenue and Indian
School Road (Ordinance G-6889)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
from PSC (Pending C-2) (Planned Shopping Center, pending Intermediate Commercial
District) to C-2 SP (Intermediate Commercial District, Special Permit) to allow self-
service and RV storage, and all underlying C-2 uses. This is a companion case to Z-21
-21-5 and should be heard immediately following.
Summary
Current Zoning: PSC (Pending C-2)
Proposed Zoning: C-2 SP
Acreage: 4.99 acres
Proposed Use: Self-service and RV storage, and all underlying C-2 uses
Owner: Prime Storage West Phoenix Land, LLC
Applicant: Neil Feaser, RKAA Architects Inc.
Representative: Thomas J. Richardson, EVP Construction
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this case on July 14,
2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-1-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 5, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Maryvale Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Approximately 600 feet west of the northwest corner of 91st Avenue and Indian School
Road
Council District: 5
Parcel Addresses: 9210 W. Indian School Road
Page 183
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 184
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-SP-2-21-5) FROM PSC (PENDING C-2) (PLANNED
SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT, PENDING INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) TO C-2 SP (INTERMEDIATE
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SPECIAL PERMIT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 4.99-acre site located approximately 600 feet
west of the northwest corner of 91st Avenue and Indian School Road in a portion of
Section 21, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit
“A”, is hereby changed from “PSC, Pending C-2” (Planned Shopping Center District,
pending Intermediate Commercial District) to “C-2 SP” (Intermediate Commercial
District, Special Permit) to allow self-service and RV storage facility, and all underlying
C-2 uses.
Page 185
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped April 19, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations and approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
2. All elevations of the buildings shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in
window size and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department
3. The sidewalk along Indian School Road shall be detached with a landscape
strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent
Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and shall include minimum 2-inch
caliper shade trees planted a minimum of 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings along both sides of the sidewalk, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work
with the Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment.
4. Perimeter walls adjacent to Indian School Road shall include material and
textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative
element, such as tile or stamped designs, and be compatible with the existing
wall adjacent to Indian School Road on the property to the west, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
5. The north landscape setback shall be planted with a minimum 3-inch caliper
trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
6. A minimum of four inverted-U bicycle spaces for guests or employees shall be
provided on site and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H of the
Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 186
7. The developer shall dedicate 55 feet of right-of-way for the north side of Indian
School Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
8. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
9. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances, bus stop pads, and public sidewalks, using the most direct
route for pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
10. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
11. Trees shall be placed to provide 75 percent shade coverage on all pedestrian
pathways and sidewalks at full maturity. Shade structures may be used to meet
the shade requirement in places where trees are unable to be located, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of September,
2021.
Page 187
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Ed Zuercher City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 188
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-SP-2-21-5
The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Maricopa, State of
Arizona, and is described as follows:
THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 2
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING IN W INDIAN SCHOOL ROAD
Page 189
Page 190
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Approximately 280 Feet North of the Northeast Corner of 59th Avenue and Lower
Buckeye Road (Ordinance G-6884)
Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the Planning
Commission recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on matters
heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on May 19, 2021 and the Planning Commission
on Aug. 5, 2021.
Summary
Application: PHO-1-21--Z-9-08-7
Existing Zoning: A-2
Acreage: 13.79
Applicant: Taylor C. Earl, Earl and Curley, P.C.
Owner: Glenda D. Massey
Representative: Taylor C. Earl, Earl and Curley, P.C.
Proposal:
1. Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance to the site plan and
elevations date stamped Feb. 5, 2008.
2. Modification of Stipulation 1.a regarding landscape setbacks widths and
landscaping surrounding Lot 2.
3. Technical corrections to Stipulations 3, 5 and 6.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Village Planning Committee Recommendation: The Estrella Village Planning
Committee heard this case on May 18, 2021 and recommended approval, as
requested by the applicant by a vote of 6-0.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer heard this case on May 19, 2021 and took
the case under advisement. On June 3, 2021, the Planning Hearing Officer took the
case out from under advisement and recommended approval with modifications and
additional stipulations. See Attachment C (Staff Report) for the Planning Hearing
Officer recommended stipulations.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 5, 2021 and
Page 191
recommended approval, per the Planning Hearing Officer recommendation with
modifications, by a vote of 8-0.
Location
Approximately 280 feet north of the northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Lower
Buckeye Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 5858 W. Lower Buckeye Road
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 192
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STIPULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
REZONING APPLICATION Z-9-08-7 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY
ORDINANCE G-5173.
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning stipulations applicable located approximately
280 feet north of the northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road in a
portion of Section 17, Township 1 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically
in Attachment “A”, are hereby modified to read as set forth below.
STIPULATIONS:
SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS
1. That The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan
DATE STAMPED AUGUST 5, 2021 and elevations date stamped MARCH 25,
2021 February 5, 2008, EXCEPT WHERE THERE MAY BE CONFLICTS
WITH GENERAL ZONING ORDIANCE STANDARDS, AND as approved or
modified by the FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND Development Services Department. with specific regard to
the following:
a. Landscape setback widths as shown on the site plan and the inclusion
of a minimum 20-foot wide landscape setback surrounding Lot 2.
A MINIMUM 30-FOOT LANDSCAPE SETBACK SHALL BE
PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ANY PUBLIC STREET LOWER
BUCKEYE ROAD.
Page 193
b. A mix of 2, 3, and 4-inch caliper, drought tolerant trees within the
landscape setback/retention areas visible from arterial streets.
2. That A 10-foot public multi-use trail shall be constructed within a 30-foot
easement per the trail detail in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail
along West Lower Buckeye Road, as approved by the Parks and Recreation
Department.
3. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A SHARED-USE PATH AND
EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF 59TH AVENUE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX STANDARD TRAIL DETAILS AND AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT.
4. That The perimeter wall visible from the arterial street shall include material
3. and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a
decorative element, such as tile, glass insets, or stamped designs, as
approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services Department.
5. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE ESTRELLA VILLAGE
ARTERIAL STREET LANDSCAPING PROGRAM, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
ARCHAEOLOGY
6. That The applicant shall conduct archaeological testing and/or monitoring
4. within the entire project area prior to clearing and grubbing, landscape
salvage, and/or grading, as approved or modified by the City Archaeologist.
7. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX ARCHAEOLOGY
OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE I DATA TESTING
AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING, LANDSCAPE
SALVAGE, AND/OR GRADING APPROVAL.
8. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON REVIEW OF
THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING, THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A QUALIFIED
ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA RECOVERY
EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT
PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.
9. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED
DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER SHALL IMMEDIATELY
CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT
RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY, NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND
Page 194
ALLOW TIME FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY ASSESS
THE MATERIALS.
STREETS
10. That Right-of-way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the north half of
5. Lower Buckeye Road as approved by the PLANNING AND Development
Services Department.
11. That Right-of-way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the east half of 59th
6. Avenue, as approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services
Department.
12. That The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
7. development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the City. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
13. That The applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project
8. Information Form for the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to the
Street Transportation Department. This form is a requirement of the EPA to
meet clean air quality requirements.
SECTION 2. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district granted pursuant to Ordinance G-5173, this portion of the rezoning is now
subject to the stipulations approved pursuant to Ordinance G-5173 and as modified in
Section 1 of this Ordinance. Any violation of the stipulation is a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Building permits shall not be issued for the subject site until
all the stipulations have been met.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of September,
2021.
Page 195
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
____________________________City Manager
Exhibits:
A - Legal Description (1 Page)
B - Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 196
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PHO-1-21-- Z-9-08-7
A PORTION OF THE SOUTH 775 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST
OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17 THENCE
NORTH 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 281.40
FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF
33.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF
453.89 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF
80.02 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF
40.01 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
768.83 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
640.22 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF
40.01 FEET
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
102.03 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
577.11 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
248.39 FEET,
THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF
230.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Page 197
Page 198
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Approximately 375 Feet East of the Northeast Corner of 59th Avenue and Elliot
Road (Ordinance G-6886)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District), S-1 (Approved C-1 PCD) (Ranch or Farm
Residence District, Approved Neighborhood Retail District, Planned Community
District), and S-1 (Approved R1-8 PCD) (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved
Single-Family Residence District, Planned Community District) to R-3 (Multifamily
Residence District).
Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 (0.67 acres), S-1 (Approved C-1 PCD) (0.62 acres), and S-1
(Approved R1-8 PCD) (3.97 acres)
Proposed Zoning: R-3
Acreage: 5.26 acres
Proposal: Multifamily residential development
Owner: AMED Partners, LLC
Applicant: Isola Elliot, LLC
Representative: Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris, PLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Laveen Village Planning Committee heard this case on July 12, 2021
and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with a modification and
additional stipulations by a vote of 6-3.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 5, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Laveen Village Planning Committee recommendation
with an additional stipulation, a modified stipulation, and a deleted stipulation by a vote
of 8-0.
Location
Approximately 375 feet east of the northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Elliot Road
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: N/A
Page 199
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 200
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-22-21-8) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE
DISTRICT), S-1 (APPROVED C-1 PCD) (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, APPROVED NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL
DISTRICT, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT), AND S-1
(APPROVED R1-8 PCD) (RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE
DISTRICT, APPROVED SINGLE-FAMILY RESICENCE DISTRICT,
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT) TO R-3 (MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 5.26 -acre site located approximately 375
feet east of the northeast corner of 59th Avenue and Elliot Road in a portion of Section
8, Township 1 South, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is
hereby changed from 0.67 acres of S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District), 0.62 acres
of S-1 (Approved C-1 PCD) (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved
Neighborhood Retail District, Planned Community District), and 3.97 acres of S-1
(Approved R1-8 PCD) (Ranch or Farm Residence District, Approved Single-Family
Page 201
Residence District, Planned Community District) to 5.26 acres of R-3 (Multifamily
Residence District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and
elevations date stamped April 19, 2021, as modified by the following stipulations
and approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2. The front elevations shall consist of a minimum 10 percent non-stucco accent
material.
3. The maximum building height shall be 22 feet.
4. All sidewalks adjacent to public rights-of-way shall be detached with a minimum
10-foot-wide continuous landscape area located between the sidewalk and back
of curb; and shall include 3-inch minimum caliper, large canopy single-trunk shade
trees, 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings; and minimum five-gallon
shrubs with a maximum mature height of 2 feet providing 75 percent live cover, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts
exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on
alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.
5. A minimum 30-foot landscape setback shall be required adjacent to Elliott Road
and shall include large canopy shade trees 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings between the sidewalk and proposed site development as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Twenty-five percent of the trees shall
be minimum four-inch caliper and 75 percent of the trees shall be minimum three-
inch caliper. Five, five-gallon shrubs per tree, and additional shrubs or live
groundcover, shall provide minimum 75 percent live cover at mature size as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts
exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on
alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.
Page 202
6. The developer shall provide a minimum of 25 percent open space, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
7. Public and private open space areas shall provide a minimum 50 percent shade
and a minimum of 50 percent live vegetative cover (shrubs, grasses, or
groundcover plants).
8. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with a minimum 2-
inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as
approved by Planning and Development Department.
9. A pedestrian connection shall be provided between the site and the C-1 portion to
the west of the site, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
10. Decorative rail or similar fencing elements shall be provided along Elliott Road, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
11. The developer shall dedicate a 30-foot wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE)
along Elliott Road and construct a minimum 10-foot wide multi-use trail (MUT)
within the easement in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where conflicts or
restrictions exist, the developer shall work with the Site Planning section on an
alternate design through the technical appeal process.
12. The multi-use trail along Elliott Road shall be shaded to a minimum of 50 percent
using shade trees at full maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
13. A minimum of 10 bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks (in adherence to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in
Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan) or “Outdoor/Covered
Facilities” for guests located near entrances or amenity areas and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
14. The developer shall provide for a 55-foot half street right-of-way dedication for the
east side of 59th Avenue from the northern project boundary, extending to Elliot
Road. This shall include 37-feet of paving for the east half of 59th Avenue, as
approved by the Planning and De elopement Department.
15. The developer shall provide for a 55-foot half street right-of-way dedication on the
north side of Elliot Road from 59th Avenue to the existing residential development
to the east. This shall include 37 feet of paving for the north half of Elliot Road and
additional improvements, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
Page 203
16. The developer shall dedicate and provide all right-of-way improvements during the
first phase of the project.
17. The developer shall provide conduit and junction boxes at the northeast corner of
59th Avenue and Elliot Road for future traffic signal equipment. The plan is to be
submitted to the Street Transportation Department for review and approval.
18. The applicant shall submit a TIA with an associated Signal Warrant Analysis for
the intersection of 59th Avenue and Elliott Road. Development will be responsible
for the installation of the traffic signal or an in-lieu contribution as defined within
the approved traffic warrant analysis. No preliminary approval of plans shall be
granted until the study is reviewed and approved by the Street Transportation
Department.
19. Existing irrigation facilities along 59th Avenue and Elliot Road are to be
undergrounded and/or relocated outside of City right-of-way. Contact SRP to
identify existing land rights and establish appropriate process to relocate the
facility. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer require
completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval.
20. The developer shall underground existing overhead electrical utilities within the
public right-of-way that are impacted or need to be relocated as part of this
project. Developer shall coordinate review and permitting with the affected utility
companies.
21. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, landscaping and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department.
All improvements shall comply with the current ADA Guidelines.
22. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
23. The developer shall provide a minimum of 24 guest parking spaces in close
proximity to the clubhouse amenity area.
24. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
Page 204
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of September,
2021.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Ed Zuercher City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 205
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-22-21-8
LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8;
THENCE SOUTH 89°58'16" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST
QUARTER, A DISTANCE OFC405.00 FEET;
THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE, NORTH 00°14'04"
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 253.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
89°58'16" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 904.93 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00°18'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 253.01 FEET TO SAID SOUTH
LINE;
THENCE NORTH 89°58'16" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 904.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 228,910.02 SQUARE FEET OR 5.26 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Page 206
Page 207
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Approximately 282 Feet West of the Northwest Corner of 23rd Street and Van
Buren Street (Ordinance G-6887)
Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
C-1 (Neighborhood Retail District) and C-3 (General Commercial District) to WU Code
T5:5 GW (Walkable Urban Code, Transect 5:5 District, Transit Gateway Character
Area) to allow multifamily residential with ground floor retail and office.
Summary
Current Zoning: C-1 (0.69 acres) and C-3 (4.54 acres)
Proposed Zoning: WU Code T5:5 GW
Acreage: 5.23
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential with ground floor retail and office
Owner: 2220 East Van Buren Street, LLC / L2 Capital, LLC
Applicant: Colin Kenyon
Representative: Colin Kenyon
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this case on Jul. 12,
2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 12-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 5, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Central City Village Planning Committee
recommendation with an additional stipulation by a vote of 8-0.
Location
Approximately 282 feet west of the northwest corner of 23rd Street and Van Buren
Street
Council District: 8
Parcel Addresses: 2220 and 2226 E. Van Buren St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 208
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-25-21-8) FROM C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL
DISTRICT) AND C-3 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) TO
WU CODE T5:5 GW (WALKABLE URBAN CODE, TRANSECT 5:5
DISTRICT, TRANSIT GATEWAY CHARACTER AREA).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 5.23-acre site located approximately 282 feet
west of the northwest corner of 23rd Street and Van Buren Street in a portion of Section
3, Township 1 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is
hereby changed from 0.69 acres of “C-1” (Neighborhood Retail District) and 4.54 acres
of “C-3” (General Commercial District) to 5.23 acres of “WU Code T5:5 GW” (Walkable
Urban Code, Transect 5:5 District, Transit Gateway Character Area).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
Page 209
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
1. The developer shall provide a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape area located
between the sidewalk and the building along the north half of Van Buren Street.
2. The developer shall provide a minimum 11-foot-wide landscape area located
between the sidewalk and back of curb along the south half of Polk Street, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
3. In addition to the bicycle parking requirements per Section 1307.H.6 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, the developer shall provide and maintain the
following bicycle infrastructure as described below and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
a. Guest bicycle parking for multifamily residential use shall be provided at
a minimum of 0.05 spaces per unit with a maximum of 50 spaces near
entrances of buildings and installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
b. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided on the site. The
station shall include but not limited to: standard repair tools affixed to the
station; a tire gauge and pump; and a bicycle repair stand which allows
pedals and wheels to spin freely while making adjustments to the bike,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
4. The developer shall dedicate a minimum 10-foot-wide sidewalk easement for
the north side of Van Buren Street, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
6. Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect
building entrances, bus stop pads, and public sidewalks, using the most direct
route for pedestrians, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
Page 210
7. Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments
that visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
8. Trees shall be placed to provide 75 percent shade coverage on all pedestrian
pathways and sidewalks at full maturity. Shade structures may be used to meet
the shade requirement in places where trees are unable to be located, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
9. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction
analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
10. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
11. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
12. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
13. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
14. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
15. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
Page 211
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of September,
2021.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Ed Zuercher City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 212
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-25-21-8:
116-01-085A
Lot 4 of the subdivision of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township I North, Range
3 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona,
according to Book I of Maps, page 41, records of Maricopa County, Arizona;
EXCEPTING the East I00 feet therefrom, and the West I foot therefrom; and
EXCEPT BEGINNING at a point which is 33 .05 feet North 0 degrees 08 minutes East
from the South section line, said point being North 89 degrees 24 minutes West, a
distance of I 024.05 feet from the Southeast comer of said Section 3;
thence North 0 degrees 08 minutes East, a distance of 10.15 feet; thence North 89
degrees 24 minutes West, a distance of 314 feet; thence South 0 degrees 08 minutes
West, a distance of 11.29 feet to the South property line of said Lot 4; thence South 89
degrees 52 minutes East, a distance of 314 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING.
116-01-086
The East 100 feet of Lot Four (4) of the subdivision of the Southeast quarter of Section
Three (3), Township One (1) North, Range Three (3) East of the Gila and Salt River
Base and Meridian, according to the plat of record in the office of the County Recorder
of Maricopa County, Arizona in Book 1of Maps, page 41.
116-01-087
The East 100 feet of Lot Four (4) of the subdivision of the Southeast quarter of Section
Three (3), Township One (1) North, Range Three (3) East of the Gila and Salt River
Base and Meridian, according to the plat of record in the office of the County Recorder
of Maricopa County, Arizona in Book 1 of Maps, page 41.
Page 213
Page 214
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
21-4 - Southeast Corner of 35th Avenue and Interstate 10 (Resolution 21954)
Request to hold a public hearing for the following item to consider adopting the
Planning Commission's recommendation and the related Resolution if approved. The
file is a companion case to Z-2-21-4 and should be heard first, followed by Z-2-21-4.
Summary
Current Plan Designation: Public/Quasi-Public
Proposed Plan Designation: Mixed Use
Acreage: 8.94 acres
Proposed Use: Commercial and multifamily uses
Owner: Eplex Realty, LLC
Applicant: Charles Huellmantel, Huellmantel & Affiliates
Representative: Charles Huellmantel, Huellmantel & Affiliates
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard the case on July 20, 2021
and recommended approval, by a vote of 7-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case again on Aug. 5, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation
by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Southeast corner of 35th Avenue and Interstate 10
Council District: 4
Parcel Addresses: 1201 N. 35th Ave. and 1280 N. 34th Ave.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 215
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2015
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-EST-1-21-
4, CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.
____________
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The 2015 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by
Resolution 21307, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-EST-1-21-4. The 8.94 acres
of property located on the southeast corner of 35th Avenue and I-10 is designated as
Mixed Use.
SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the 2015 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as
shown below:
Page 216
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of September 2021.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:___________________________
___________________________
REVIEWED BY:
______________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager
Page 217
Attachment B
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
July 12, 2021
Application: GPA-EST-1-21-4
Applicant: Charles Huellmantel, Huellmantel & Affiliates
Owner: Eplex Realty, LLC
Representative: Charles Huellmantel, Huellmantel & Affiliates
Location: Southeast corner of 35th Avenue and Interstate 10
Acreage: 8.94 acres
Current Plan Designation: Public/Quasi-Public
Requested Plan Designation: Mixed Use
Reason for Requested Change: Minor General Plan Amendment to change the
designation to mixed-use to allow for commercial
and multifamily uses.
Estrella Village Planning
Committee Date: July 20, 2021
Staff Recommendation: Approval
FINDINGS:
1) The companion rezoning case, Z-2-20-4, as stipulated, proposes commercial and
multifamily on the site that is consistent in scale and character with land uses in
the general area.
2) The Mixed Use land use designation requested is consistent with the proposed
R-4A and C-2 zoning, as it allows commercial and residential land uses within a
quarter-mile of two modes of high-capacity transit.
Page 218
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-1-21-4
Page 2
3) The subject site is in proximity to two planned high-capacity transit lines. Thus, a
gradual increase in residential density from the existing land use designation is
appropriate.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is located on the southeast corner of 35th Avenue and Interstate 10
and was formerly utilized as a United States Navy recruitment center. The companion
Rezoning Case No. Z-2-21-4 is requesting to rezone a portion of the subject site from
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) and R-5 (Multifamily Residence District) to R-
4A (Multifamily Residence District) and C-2 (Intermediate Commercial District) to allow
a mix of residential and commercial uses. A multi-story multifamily residential
development is proposed along the eastern portion of the site, while a fuel station and
convenience store are proposed along the south portion of the site. A future commercial
use is also proposed along this north portion of the property.
In 1999, the City of Phoenix approved the Estrella Village Plan which identified goals,
objectives and strategies pertaining to growth, the village core, protection of residential
neighborhoods, housing and employment, and urban design among other elements.
This plan identified the land use designation of the subject site as Public/Quasi-Public,
which include schools, churches, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, government
complexes and utility facilities. The former use of the site, a United States Navy
recruitment center, was consistent with this land use designation.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map Amendment to Mixed Use, will allow a land
use map designation that is consistent with the concurrent rezoning case, Z-2-21-4,
which proposes residential and commercial uses on the site. The Mixed Use Land Use
Map designation is appropriate at this location as it is located within a quarter-mile of
the proposed Capitol/I-10 West mass-transit extension that will connect Downtown
Phoenix with West Phoenix along a portion of the I-10 freeway. A secondary high-
capacity transit mode, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), will also be available within close
proximity to the site. The Mixed Use land use designation allows for a mix of uses such
as residential, service, basic commercial, general office, entertainment, and cultural
functions. These mix of uses that can provide housing, shopping and employment
opportunities in the same area and benefit the site’s proximity to transportation
corridors, I-10 and the future light rail corridor.
This land use map designation, as requested, would further diversify the land uses in
this part of the Estrella Village in a manner consistent with development patterns based
on the existing zoning and general plan land use map designations which include
residential, commercial, open space and public/quasi-public categories.
Page 219
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-1-21-4
Page 3
Capitol/I-10 West Transit Map with Planning and Development Department annotations, Source: Valley
Metro
As of the writing of this staff report, Valley Metro had determined a locally preferred
high-capacity transit alignment approximately 0.1 miles north of the site. The Capitol/I-
10 West high-capacity transit corridor will serve as a major transportation route in this
part of the region, connecting the residents of this future development to employment,
shopping, educational, and other opportunities in Downtown and West Phoenix.
Furthermore, as of the
writing of this staff report,
the City of Phoenix Transit
Department and Citizen
Transportation
Commission had
recommended that 35th
Avenue/Van Buren Street
route be approved as a
BRT corridor. This high-
capacity transit will serve
to connect residents along
35th Avenue and Van
Buren Street to
employment, shopping,
educational, and other
opportunities in Downtown
and North West Phoenix.
MAG BRT Corridor Map with Planning and Development Department annotations,
Source: Maricopa Association of Governments
Page 220
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-1-21-4
Page 4
SURROUNDING LAND USES
The proposed general plan land use map amendment is located in the northeast portion
of the Estrella Village and is generally bounded by the Interstate 10 to the north, north of
the Latham Street alignment to the south, 35th Avenue to the west and 34th Avenue to
the east. North of the site, the General Plan Land Use Map designation is
Transportation within the I-10 and Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre within the
Maryvale Village north of the freeway. A future proposed light rail station is envisioned
at this intersection of 35th Avenue and I-10, as part of the Capitol/I-10 West light rail
extension.
Existing General Plan Land Use Map designation, Source: Planning and Development Department
South of the subject site is Falcon Park, a city-owned and maintained park, designated
as Parks or Open Space – Publicly Owned. This property is zoned R1-6 (Single-Family
Residence District) and R-5 (Multifamily Residence District). Further south, across
Roosevelt Street, is Carl Hayden High School, a public high school that is in the
Phoenix Union High School District which is also zoned R1-6 and R-5.
Page 221
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-1-21-4
Page 5
West of the property, across 35th Avenue, is a fuel station and convenience store zoned
C-3 (General Commercial District) and designated as Commercial on the General Plan
Land Use Map. There are also single-family residences zoned R1-6 and R-2
(Multifamily Residence District) which are designated as Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre.
East of the subject site, across 34th Avenue, the General Plan Land Use Map has
designated properties as Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre. These properties
are established residential subdivisions which are zoned R1-6 (Single-Family
Residence District).
RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES
• TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Develop land
use and design regulations governing land close to transit centers and
light rail stations, to maximize the potential for ridership
Rezoning case Z-2-21-4, companion of this General Plan Amendment, proposes
to develop a portion of the site as multifamily residential that will have pedestrian
access to 35th Avenue in order to connect future residents of this community to
transportation options including bus and future high-capacity transit stations
along 35th Avenue. The proximity to transportation opportunities in the area will
encourage the use of high-capacity transit and thus reduce vehicular trips.
• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote and encourage
compatible development and redevelopment with a mix of housing types in
neighborhoods close to employment centers, commercial areas, and where
transit or transportation alternatives exist.
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment and companion rezoning
case will allow for a commercial and multifamily residential development to be
established on the subject site. This will provide additional employment
opportunities in the area and introduce a new housing type in an area that is
predominantly single-family residential. This proposed amendment will locate a
residential use near existing residential uses along 34th Avenue, and commercial
development along an existing commercial corridor along 35th Avenue. This
amendment will support an increase in intensity on the property within proximity
to the I-10 freeway, 35th Avenue, and future high-capacity transit corridors that
will help serve the increased density over the existing zoning by this
development.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS
Page 222
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-1-21-4
Page 6
• CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER: DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Create new
development or redevelopment that is sensitive to the scale and character
of the surrounding neighborhoods and incorporates adequate development
standards to prevent negative impact(s) on the residential properties.
As stipulated via companion Case No. Z-2-21-4, the proposed multifamily
residential zoning will incorporate stipulations to prevent negative impacts on
existing residential properties east of the site. These stipulations include an
enhanced building setback and balcony limitations along 34th Avenue, building
height limitations, and enhanced landscaping along the street frontage to help
with screening of the site.
• DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of
housing types and densities where appropriate within each village that
support a broad range of lifestyles.
The proposed General Plan Amendment will further diversify the existing land
use map designations in this part of the city by allowing a multifamily residential
use in an area that currently does not have many housing options. The
stipulations for case Z-2-21-4 incentivizes affordable housing on the site by
allowing a greater building height. This will help to provide diverse housing
opportunities within proximity to transit to allow a broader range of lifestyles in
this area to both current and future residents.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommendation for GPA-EST-1-21-4 is to approve as filed, as Mixed Use.
The proposed land use map designation is consistent in scale and character with
existing land uses in the surrounding area. The subject site is in the general vicinity of
future high-capacity transit and the I-10 freeway, part of a major transportation corridor
for this part of the Phoenix Metropolitan region. The Mixed Use land use designation will
allow for a mix of uses such as residential, service, basic commercial, general office,
entertainment, and cultural functions that can be integrated to provide housing,
shopping and employment opportunities in the same area. The companion rezoning
case, Z-2-21-4, will provide compatibility and consistency with the land use pattern in
the surrounding area, in addition to buffering the adjacent single-family zoned property
to the east of 34th Avenue. Approval of the request will support the development of this
underutilized site with uses that are compatible with the land use designations and
zoning districts in the general area, while allowing for compatible uses within proximity
of a future high-capacity transit station.
Writer
Enrique Bojórquez-Gaxiola
July 12, 2021
Page 223
Staff Analysis
GPA-EST-1-21-4
Page 7
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Page 224
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-EST-1-21-4 ACRES: 8.94 +/-
VILLAGE: Estrella COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4
APPLICANT: Charles Huellmantel
EXISTING:
Public/Quasi-Public ( 8.94 +/- Acres)
WILLETTA ST
Proposed Change Area
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Commercial
Industrial
Public/Quasi-Public
§
¦
¨
Transportation
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
35TH AVE 34TH AVE
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Mixed Use ( 8.94 +/- Acres)
WILLETTA ST
Proposed Change Area
Mixed Use
§
¦
¨
35TH AVE 34TH AVE
Page 225
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-EST-1-21-4_BW ACRES: 8.94 +/-
VILLAGE: Estrella COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4
APPLICANT: Charles Huellmantel
EXISTING:
Public/Quasi-Public ( 8.94 +/- Acres)
WILLETTA ST
Proposed Change Area
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Commercial
Industrial
Public/Quasi-Public
§
¦
¨
Transportation
E E E E
E E E E Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
34TH AVE
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
35TH AVE
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Mixed Use ( 8.94 +/- Acres)
WILLETTA ST
Proposed Change Area
Mixed Use
§
¦
¨
35TH AVE 34TH AVE
Page 226
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-EST-1-21-4
Date of VPC Meeting July 20, 2021
Request From To amend the General Plan Land Use Designation on
approximately 8.94 acres located at the southeast corner
of 35th Avenue and I-10 freeway from Public/Quasi-
Public to Mixed Use to allow commercial and multifamily
uses.
Proposed Use Multifamily and commercial uses including a
convenience store with fuel station
Location Southeast corner of 35th Avenue and I-10 freeway
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation in the staff
report
VPC Vote 7-0, motion passed; None in dissent.
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases GPA-EST-1-21-4 and Z-2-21-4 were heard concurrently.
No requests to speak from members of the public were received.
Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a combined presentation
for companion cases GPA-EST-1-21-4 and Z-2-21-4. He discussed the location of
the site, noting surrounding land uses including a public park and the I-10 freeway.
He discussed the existing General Plan Land Use map designation of Public/Quasi-
Public and the requested Land Use map amendment to Mixed Use. He discussed
the surrounding zoning districts in the area, Estrella Village Plan, Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program and other policy documents including the
General Plan. Future high-capacity transit efforts were discussed, pertaining to the
Capitol/I-10 West extension and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line along 35th Avenue.
The conceptual site plans for the proposed commercial and multifamily-zoned
portions of the site were shown, indicating the vehicular access points, centralized
pedestrian connection, plus open space and density proposed. The conceptual
building elevations and/or materials were discussed. He concluded the presentation
by providing a staff recommendation of approval on each case and describing the
proposed stipulations for case Z-2-21-4, as presented in Addendum A of the staff
report.
Charles Huellmantel, with Huellmantel and Affiliates, introduced himself as the
applicant and discussed the location of the site plus former use as a United States
Navy recruitment center. The location of the proposed C-2 and R-4A zoning was
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 227
discussed, including a history of awards based on residential development projects
completed. Images of previous multifamily projects were shown to illustrate the
character of the proposed residential community that is intended to be affordable
within the project site. The conceptual site plan and elevations for the proposed
commercial and multifamily zoning were shown and discussed. He concluded the
presentation by requesting approval of case GPA-EST-1-21-4 and Z-2-21-4.
Lisa Perez asked for clarification on what the ingress and egress southbound along
35th Avenue was going to be like.
Mr. Huellmantel stated that his team has worked with the Street Transportation
Department on future improvements along 35th Avenue. A streetlight might not be
warranted at this location due to the existing traffic that is already present on this
street.
Ms. Perez asked how other committee members felt about the proposal.
Vice Chair Parris Wallace stated that she has spoken with the applicant on
previous concerns that she had. She lives very close to the site and did have various
questions pertaining to this project, including whether the community will be
proposed residential community will be mixed-income or all affordable. She prefers
an all affordable housing community here, since affordable housing is very difficult to
come by. Other questions that she had pertained to site access and discussed the
impacts of the I-10 freeway to this community. She has no other concerns now but
does suggest that edible landscaping is utilized within the landscape areas.
Ms. Perez stated that the property is blighted and there is lots of traffic that already
exists in the area. She hopes that the project will be welcoming to the community.
Vice Chair Wallace stated that no major concerns have been discussed with her
from the community so far.
Dan Rush asked if a right-turn lane could be added along 35t Avenue to carry traffic
into the I-10 freeway.
Mr. Huellmantel responded that he is still working with the Street Transportation
Department regarding street improvements, but also wants to maintain good access
to their site along 35th Avenue. Furthermore, the Arizona Department of
Transportation (ADOT) also has control over street improvements near the I-10
ramp.
Chairman Cardenas asked for further discussion or individual motions on each
item.
MOTION – GPA-EST-1-21-4:
Mr. Cardenas motioned to approve case GPA-EST-1-21-4 per the staff
recommendation in the staff report. Ms. Perez seconded the motion to approve.
VOTE – GPA-EST-1-21-4:
7-0, motion passed; None in dissent.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 228
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 229
Attachment D
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
August 5, 2021
ITEM NO: 3
DISTRICT NO.: 4
SUBJECT:
Application #: GPA-EST-1-21-4 (Companion Case Z-2-21-4)
Location: Southeast corner of 35th Avenue and I-10
From: Public/Quasi Public
To: Mixed Use
Acreage: 8.94
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to change the designation to mixed-use
to allow for commercial and multifamily uses.
Applicant: Charles Huellmantel, Huellmantel & Affiliates
Owner: Eplex Realty, LLC
Representative: Charles Huellmantel, Huellmantel & Affiliates
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Estrella 7/20/2021 Approval. Vote: 7-0.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee
recommendation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Johnson made a MOTION to approve GPA-EST-1-21-4, per the
Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Johnson
Second: Howard
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Gorraiz and Magnum
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The companion rezoning case, Z-2-20-4, as stipulated, proposes commercial and
multifamily on the site that is consistent in scale and character with land uses in
the general area.
2. The Mixed Use land use designation requested is consistent with the proposed
R-4A and C-2 zoning, as it allows commercial and residential land uses within a
quarter-mile of two modes of high-capacity transit.
3. The subject site is in proximity to two planned high-capacity transit lines. Thus, a
gradual increase in residential density from the existing land use designation is
appropriate.
Page 230
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Angie
Holdsworth at (602) 495-5622, TTY use 7-1-1.
Page 231
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Southeast Corner of 35th Avenue and Interstate 10 (Ordinance G-6890)
Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-2-21-4
and rezone the site from R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) and R-5 (Multifamily
Residence District) to R-4A (Multifamily Residence District) and C-2 (Intermediate
Commercial District) to allow multifamily residential and commercial uses including a
convenience store with fuel station. This file is a companion case to GPA-EST-1-21-4
and should be heard immediately following.
Summary
Current Zoning: R1-6 (6.98 acres) and R-5 (2.41 acres)
Proposed Zoning: R-4A (5.67 acres) and C-2 (3.72 acres)
Acreage: 9.39 acres
Proposed Use: Multifamily residential and commercial uses including a convenience
store with fuel station
Owner: Eplex Realty, LLC
Applicant: Charles Huellmantel, Huellmantel & Affiliates
Representative: Charles Huellmantel, Huellmantel & Affiliates
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this case on July 20, 2021
and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation in the Addendum A Staff
Report by a vote of 7-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 5, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation
with an additional stipulation by a vote of 7-0.
Location
Southeast corner of 35th Avenue and Interstate 10
Council District: 4
Parcel Addresses: 1201 N. 35th Ave. and 1280 N. 34th Ave.
Page 232
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 233
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-2-21-4) FROM R1-6 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT) AND R-5 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT) TO
R-4A (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT) AND C-2
(INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT).
____________
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
SECTION 1. The zoning of a 9.39 acre site located at southeast corner of
35th Avenue and Interstate 10 in a portion of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range 2
East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from 6.98 acres of
“R1-6” (Single-Family Residence District) and 2.41 acres of “R-5” (Multifamily
Residence District) to 5.67 acres of “R-4A” (Multifamily Residence District) and 3.72
acres of “C-2” (Intermediate Commercial District).
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to
modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification
change as shown in Exhibit “B”.
Page 234
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use
district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:
R-4A ZONED AREA
1. For the R-4A portion of the site, the maximum building height and density
shall not exceed 30 feet and 98 dwelling units. If the following conditions are
met, the maximum height and density shall be 40 feet and 200 dwelling units.
The conditions must be met prior to or in conjunction with the Final Site Plan
Review.
a. A minimum of 75 percent of the housing units are dedicated for long-
term affordability, as approved by the Phoenix Housing Department.
b. The applicant shall submit a copy of the draft Declaration of Affirmative
Land use and Restrictive Covenants agreement (LURA), for review and
approval by the Phoenix Housing Department.
c. The applicant shall submit a copy of the Proforma, for review and
approval by the Phoenix Housing Department.
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the R-4A portion of the site, the
applicant shall submit a copy of the Recorded Declaration of Affirmative Land
use and Restrictive Covenants agreement (LURA), as approved by the State
Housing Department, if conditions listed in Stipulation No.1 for additional
height and density are pursued.
3. An average building setback of 40 feet, minimum 20 feet for up to 25 percent
of the frontage, shall be provided along 34th Avenue.
4. A minimum 20-foot building setback shall be provided along the north property
line of the residentially zoned portion of the site.
5. Residential building elevations shall be developed to the following standards,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department:
a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent
materials and textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such
as brick, stone, colored textured concrete, stucco, painted steel or
other materials to provide a decorative and aesthetic treatment, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 235
b. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to a public park or street,
shall contain a minimum of 25 percent brick, masonry, stone or another
exterior accent material that exhibits quality and durability.
c. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, pop-outs,
recesses, variation in window size and location, pitched roofs and/or
overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department
d. Balconies and windows shall be provided for residential units adjacent
to a public park.
6. There shall be no balconies on the upper floors of residential buildings located
within 60 feet of the front property line which are oriented toward single-family
residential homes not part of this development, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
7. An average landscape setback of 10 feet, minimum 5 feet for up to 50 percent
of the property line, shall be provided along the north property line.
8. The required landscape setbacks for the residentially zoned portion of the site
shall be planted with minimum 50-percent 2-inch caliper and 50-percent 3-
inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant evergreen trees, 20 feet on center
or in equivalent groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
9. A central amenity and open space area shall be provided within close
proximity to the primary vehicular entrance into the development. The
following amenities shall be provided at a minimum and may be dispersed
throughout the development, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:
a. Tot lot;
b. Clubhouse or community room;
c. Two picnic areas each with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a
picnic table; and
d. Two benches or seating features.
10. Vehicular entryways to the residential portion of the development along 34th
Avenue shall include the following elements, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department:
a. Pedestrian pathways connecting the interior of the development to the
public sidewalks on one side of the vehicular driveway at minimum.
Page 236
b. The pedestrian pathways shall be lined with landscape areas on both
sides and planted with drought-tolerant plant materials providing
seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover.
c. A mix of ornamental shrubs and flower beds that will maintain a
constant bloom throughout the year and 75 percent live cover, shall be
provided along the entryway.
d. The driveway surface shall be constructed of decorative pavers,
stamped or colored concrete, or another material, other than those
used to pave the parking surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
11. A perimeter wall no less than 6 feet in height shall be provided along the
Interstate 10 freeway within the residentially zoned portion of the site. This
wall shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split
face block with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
12. Except where required by the Zoning Ordinance, perimeter walls adjacent to a
public street or public park shall be limited to open view wrought iron fencing
or a combination of 2-foot solid masonry topped by wrought iron open view
fencing, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The indoor noise levels of residential units shall not exceed a decibel day
night-level (DNL) of 45 decibels and that along with the building plans
submitted for Phoenix Building Construction Code compliance review to the
Planning and Development Department there shall be a sealed and signed
analysis by an engineer licensed in Arizona with a proficiency in residential
sound mitigation or noise control. The engineer shall note in the analysis that
the building design is capable of achieving the required Noise Level
Reduction.
14. A minimum five-foot-wide sidewalk along 34th Avenue shall be detached with
a minimum five-foot-wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and
back of curb and shall include minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large
canopy drought-tolerant shade trees planted a minimum of 20 feet on center
or in equivalent groupings between the sidewalk and back of curb, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
15. The developer shall dedicate minimum 25 feet of right-of-way and construct
the west side of 34th Avenue for the full limits of the project, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
16. If the portion of 34th Avenue north of Moreland Street is not approved to be
abandoned through a separate process, the developer shall provide a 50-foot
Page 237
radius cul-de-sac termination at 34th Avenue, north of Moreland Avenue, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
C-2 ZONED AREA
17. The development shall be in general conformance with the conceptual site
plan date stamped July 14, 2021 and building elevations date stamped May
16, 2021 for the C-2 portion of the site, except as described below and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
18. The conceptual site plan and elevations for Lot 2, as depicted in the site plan
for the overall site date stamped June 30, 2021, shall be administratively
reviewed by the Planning Hearing Officer prior to preliminary site plan
approval with specific regard to the inclusion of the below elements. This
review is for conceptual purposes only. Specific development standards and
requirements will be determined by the Planning and Development
Department.
a. Location and orientation of buildings and trash receptables in relation to
the residentially zoned property to the east.
b. Accessible pedestrian pathways that connect building entrances, public
sidewalks, and the pedestrian pathway connecting the commercially
zoned property to the residentially zoned property to the east using the
most direct route for pedestrians.
c. Pedestrian connection between adjacent commercial parcels.
d. All elevations of the building/s shall contain architectural
embellishments and detailing, such as: textural changes, pilasters,
offsets, recesses, variation in window size or location, overhang
canopies, or similar features.
19. A minimum 20-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the east
side of the site where adjacent to a residential zoning district. This landscape
setback shall be planted with a minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy
evergreen trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
20. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards along
arterial streets in the Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
21. A landscaped gateway entry feature shall be provided on the southeast corner
of 35th Avenue and Interstate 10 as described below and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department:
Page 238
a. An average 75-foot by 75-foot landscape entryway that adheres to the
landscape palette for gateway entry features in the Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program.
b. A minimum 300-square foot landscaped accent area shall be provided.
The landscaped accent area shall provide a visually unique character
with drought-tolerant plant materials providing seasonal interest and 75
percent live cover.
c. The gateway entry feature shall utilize accents, colors and materials
consistent with the theme of the commercial uses on the same site, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
22. The bus stop pad along 35th Avenue shall be shaded to a minimum of 50
percent using shade trees at full maturity, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
23. Public Transit Department shall retain right-of-way and bus stop pads on
northbound 35th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
24. All sidewalks along 35th Avenue shall be detached with a landscape strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent
Cross Section of the Street Classification Map and planted to the following
standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant
shade trees to provide shade to a minimum 75 percent at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation designed to grow to a maximum mature
height of 24 inches and achieve 75 percent live coverage.
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise
provided herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
25. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50-feet of right-of-way and construct
the east half of 35th Avenue for the full limits of the project, per Cross Section
D standards identified on the City of Phoenix Street Classification Map, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
26. Driveway access control to the site will be permitted as approved by the
Traffic Impact Study submitted to the Street Transportation Department by
Page 239
providing a sealed Traffic Impact Study analyzing access control and
proposed mitigation for conflicting turning movements along 35th Avenue.
27. The site shall provide recorded cross-access agreements between lots one
and two as depicted on the conceptual site plan date stamped June 30, 2021,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
28. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the developer shall work with the Office
of Pedestrian Safety in the Street Transportation Department to evaluate a
HAWK crossing at the southern boundary of the site within 35th Avenue. The
developer shall be responsible for funding any identified improvements
including the HAWK crossing, as determined by the Street Transportation
Department, but generally to be located between Moreland Street and
Portland Street.
R-4A AND C-2 ZONED AREAS
29. All perimeter walls visible from street right-of-way and adjacent to the public
park shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split
face block with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs or other
alternatives if full view fencing is proposed, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
30. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper large canopy drought tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be
dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at
maturity, as approved by Planning and Development Department.
31. Pedestrian walkways connecting the commercial sites and residentially zoned
property to the east, public sidewalks, and walkways within the residentially
zoned portion of the site shall be shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using
shade trees at maturity and/or architectural shade, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
32. A system of pedestrian thoroughfares shall be provided as described below
and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department:
a. The developer shall provide a minimum of one centralized pedestrian
pathway connecting the public sidewalk along 35th Avenue passing
through Lot 1 to the public sidewalk along 34th Avenue passing
through Lot 3, as depicted in the site plan for the overall site date
stamped June 30, 2021. Each phase of the project will construct the
portion of the pedestrian path along their development.
b. Illuminated pedestrian scale lighting per Section 1304.H.5 for the
centralized pedestrian pathway.
Page 240
c. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall
be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or
other pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive
aisle surfaces. Vehicular crossings shall be kept to a minimum.
d. Connections to/between via the most direct route:
(1) All building entrances;
(2) Active open space areas;
(3) Adjacent public sidewalks; and
(4) Bus stop along 35th Avenue.
33. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. “Secure/Covered Facilities” bicycle parking shall be provided at a rate
of 0.25 spaces per dwelling unit on the residential portion of the site, up
to a maximum of 20 spaces, as defined in Appendix K of the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.
b. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through
Inverted U and/or artistic racks located near the building entrance of
each enclosed commercial and residential building and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks
shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of
the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.
c. One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and
maintained in the residentially zoned portion of the site within a central
amenity area or along a centralized pedestrian pathway. The bicycle
repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high
visibility and separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where
applicable. The repair station shall include: standard repair tools affixed
to the station; a tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station
or the ground; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and
wheels to spin freely while making adjustments to the bike.
34. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
Page 241
35. A Red Border Letter shall be processed for this development, as determined
by the Planning and Development Department.
36. The developer shall record a Notice of Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to
Airport in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) to future owners or tenants of
the property.
37. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
38. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of
the development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
39. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from
Phase I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
40. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
41. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions hereof.
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of September,
2021.
________________________________
MAYOR
Page 242
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Ed Zuercher City Manager
Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)
Page 243
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-2-21-4
R-4A ZONED AREA
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 2 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 2;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
832.74 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
338.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
464.56 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
491.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
465.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
494.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
C-2 ZONED AREA
LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH,
RANGE 2 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA
COUNTY, ARIZONA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 2;
THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
832.74 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
Page 244
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST
ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 464.26 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
331.62 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
464.55 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
331.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Page 245
Page 246
Attachment B
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
Estrella Village Planning Committee July 20, 2021
Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date August 5, 2021
Request From: R1-6 (6.98 acres) and R-5 (2.41 acres)
Request To: C-2 (3.72 acres) and R-4A (5.67 acres)
Proposed Use Multifamily and commercial uses including a
convenience store with fuel station
Location Southeast corner of 35th Avenue and Interstate
Owner Eplex Realty, LLC
Applicant QuikTrip Corportation
Representative Huellmantel & Affiliates, Charles Huellmantel
Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
General Plan Current Public/Quasi-Public
Land Use Map
Designation Proposed (GPA- Mixed Use (8.94 acres)
EST-1-21-4)
Varies, 33-foot to 40-
35th Avenue Major Arterial Street foot east half street
Street Map (plus easement)
Classification
25-foot west half street
34th Avenue Local Street
easement
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The requested zoning will allow for increased intensity that is generally consistent in scale
and character with the surrounding zoning and General Plan Land Use Map designations
in the area. Located at the junction of a major arterial street, Interstate 10 freeway and
future high-capacity transit modes along 35th Avenue, the proposed commercial and
Page 247
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
multifamily zoning is compatible with the surrounding area. The development, as
stipulated, provides a reasonable level of intensity that is respectful to local conditions by
transitioning commercial uses along 35th Avenue to existing single-family homes east of
34th Avenue.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; TRANSIT ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Develop land use and design regulations
governing land close to transit centers and light rail stations, to maximize the
potential for ridership.
The requested C-2 and R-4A zoning districts will allow for a mix of uses on the subject
site, including multifamily and a convenience store with fuel stations near high capacity
transit corridors and near various land uses such as a high school and several
commercial establishments. This variety of zoning districts will allow for both housing and
additional employment options within the Southwest Phoenix Major Employment center.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE;
CONNECTED NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Design and locate new
neighborhoods to promote access (both physical and visual) to parks
and open space. New developments should also provide convenient pedestrian
and bicycle access to transit stops, schools and other neighborhood amenities.
Approval of the request would locate a multifamily use adjacent to a public park (Falcon
Park) which will allow immediate access to open space and recreational opportunities.
Furthermore, bicycle lanes are located along Roosevelt Street, south of Falcon Park, in
addition to a bus stop along 35th Avenue and within walking distance to a future mass-
transit station. As stipulated, the development will promote shaded walkways and/or
sidewalks plus bicycle parking and repair facilities to encourage walking and bicycling.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development
and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposal, as stipulated, will be required to provide shade along the adjacent 35th
Avenue sidewalks, pedestrian paths connecting the development to adjacent streets, the
parking lot and nearby bus stop. This will help to encourage walking and to mitigate the
urban heat island effect by covering hard surfaces, thus cooling the micro-climate around
the project vicinity.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Estrella Village Plan: See Background Item No. 9.
Page 248
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program: See Background Item No. 10.
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 11.
Complete Street Guidelines: See Background Item No. 12.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 13.
Reimagine Phoenix: See Background Item No. 14.
Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 15.
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Former U.S. Navy Recruitment Center R1-6 and R-5
North Interstate 10 Freeway R1-6 and R-5
South Falcon Park R1-6 and R-5
East (across 34th Avenue) Single-family homes and ADOT R1-6
landscape area
West (across 35th Avenue) Fuel station and ADOT landscape area C-3
C-2 (Intermediate Commercial) Zoning District
Standards Requirements Met or Not Met
Minimum Building Setbacks
Street (35th Avenue) Average 25 feet, minimum 20 35 feet (Met)
feet permitted for up to 50% of
structure
Not adjacent to street (north) 0 feet 50 feet (Met)
when adjacent to C-2 zoning
Not adjacent to street (south) 50 feet 50 feet (Met)
when adjacent to R1-6 zoning
Not adjacent to street (south) 15 feet 50 feet (Met)
when adjacent to R-5 zoning
Not adjacent to street (east) 15 feet 50 feet (Met)
when adjacent to R-4A zoning
(pending Z-2-21-4)
Page 249
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
Minimum Landscaped Setbacks
Street (35th Avenue) Average 25 feet for structures 25 feet (Met)
not exceeding two stories or
30 feet, minimum 20 feet
permitted for up to 50% of
the frontage.
Perimeter property lines not None 10 feet (Met)
adjacent to a street when
adjacent to C-2 zoning
(pending Z-2-21-4)
Perimeter property lines not 10 feet 10 feet (south) (Met)
adjacent to a street (south and
east) (pending Z-2-21-4) 20 feet (east) (Met)
Maximum Lot Coverage 50% 18% (Met)
Maximum Building Height 2 stories and 30 feet 20 feet (Met)
Minimum Parking Retail establishments less 50 spaces total (Met)
than 50,000 square feet of
gross building area: 1 space
per 300 square feet of floor
area
5,002 gross square feet for
convenience store.
17 spaces required.
R-4A (Multifamily Residential) Zoning District
Standards Requirements Met or Not Met
Total Maximum Number of 247 units 192 units (Met)
Units
Maximum Density 43.56 dwelling units per acre 33.87 dwelling units
per acre (Met)
Page 250
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
Minimum Building Setbacks
Front (34th Avenue) 20 feet 20 feet (Met)
Sides (north and south) 5 feet 20 feet (Met)
Rear (west) 15 feet 15 feet (Met)
Minimum Landscaped Setbacks
Front (34th Avenue) 20 feet 15 feet (Not Met)*
Sides and rear (north, south 5 feet 5 feet (Met)
and west)
Maximum Lot Coverage 50% 27% (Met)
Maximum Building Height 48 feet 3 stories, 36 feet (Met)
Minimum Parking Multifamily dwelling units: 194 spaces provided
(Not Met)*
1.3 spaces per efficiency unit
and 1.5 spaces per 1 or 2
bedroom unit and 2 spaces
per 3 or more bedroom unit,
1.0 space per unit of less than
600 square feet regardless of
number of bedrooms
When the required parking is
reserved for residents,
additional unreserved parking
is required as follows: 0.3
spaces for each efficiency unit
and 0.5 spaces per each 1 or
2 bedroom unit and 1.0 space
per each 3 or more bedroom
unit.
112 one bedroom units and 80
two bedroom units proposed.
288 spaces required.
*Variance or site plan modification may be required.
Page 251
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone a 9.39-acre site, located at southeast corner of 35th
Avenue and the Interstate 10 from 6.98 acres of R1-6 (Single-Family Residence
District) and 2.41 acres of R-5 (Multifamily Residence District) to 5.67 acres of R-4A
(Multifamily Residence District) and 3.72 acres of C-2 (Intermediate Commercial) to
allow multifamily and commercial uses including a convenience store and fuel
station. The applicant intends to develop affordable housing units within the
proposed multifamily-family zoned portion of the site, thus allowing for additional
housing diversity in this part of the Estrella Village. This and other elements of the
project are addressed in further detail subsequently in the report.
SURROUNDING USES AND ZONING
2. North of the subject site is the Interstate 10 freeway zoned R1-6 (Single-Family
Residence District) and R-5 (Multifamily Residence District). A future high-capacity
transit station is proposed just across the I-10 freeway within close proximity to 35th
Avenue.
South of the subject site is a public park, Falcon Park, zoned R1-6 (Single-Family
Residence District) and R-5 (Multifamily Residence District). Carl Hayden High
School is located south of Falcon Park across Roosevelt Street along 35th Avenue.
West of the subject site
across 35th Avenue is
ADOT right-of-way
property and a
convenience store with a
fuel station zoned C-3
(General Commercial
District).
East of the subject site,
across 34th Avenue, are
single-family homes
zoned
R1-6 (Single-Family
Residence District).
Zoning Aerial Map, Source: Planning and Development
Department
Page 252
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
3. The subject site has a General Plan Land Use Map designation of Public/Quasi-
Public which is not consistent with the proposed commercial and multifamily
residential zoning requested. A concurrent minor General Plan Land Use Map
amendment under case GPA-EST-1-21-4 is proposed to change this land use
designation to Mixed Use.
The Mixed Use land use designation requested is consistent with the proposed R-
4A and C-2 zoning, as it allows commercial and residential land uses. Furthermore,
this will promote the use of transit due to its proximity to various modes of high-
capacity transit along 35th Avenue.
CAPITOL I-10/WEST EXTENSION
4. As of the writing of this staff report, Valley Metro had determined a locally preferred
high-capacity transit alignment approximately 0.1 miles north of the site. The
Capitol/I-10 West high-capacity transit corridor will serve as a major transportation
route in this part of the region, connecting the residents of this future development to
employment, shopping, educational, and other opportunities in Downtown and West
Phoenix.
Page 253
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
Capitol/I-10 West Transit Map with Planning and Development Department
annotations, Source: Valley Metro
BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)
5. Furthermore, as of the writing of
this staff report, the City of
Phoenix Transit Department and
Citizen Transportation
Commission had recommended
that 35th Avenue/Van Buren
Street route be approved as a
BRT corridor. This high-capacity
transit will serve to connect
residents along 35th Avenue and
Van Buren Street to employment,
shopping, educational, and other
opportunities in Downtown and
North West Phoenix.
MAG BRT Corridor Map with Planning and
Development Department annotations, Source:
Maricopa Association of Governments
PROPOSAL
6. Site Plan
The conceptual site plan identifies the western portion of the 9.39-acre site along
35th Avenue as a convenience store with fuel canopies and a future commercial
user on the north portion of the site along the Interstate 10 freeway. The eastern
portion of the site along 34th Avenue proposes a 192-unit multifamily development
with one and two-bedroom units located in eight residential buildings at three stories
and 36 feet in height. Two vehicular access points to the proposed multifamily
Page 254
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
zoning are shown along 34th Avenue, with pedestrian connections to both 35th
Avenue and 34th Avenue.
Conceptual Site Plan, Source: Otak Architects, Inc.
Stipulation No. 1 limits the maximum building height and density to 30 feet or 98
dwelling units on the proposed multifamily-zoned portion of the site. However, if
affordable housing is provided on the proposed multifamily-zoned portion of the site,
the maximum building height and density shall be 40 feet and 200 dwelling units. If
the development utilizes the additional height and density outlined in Stipulation No.
1, staff is also requesting Stipulation No. 2 that requires a recorded Declaration of
Affirmative Land Use and Restrictive Covenants Agreement be provided prior to
issuance of building permits for any structures to ensure that the affordability
restrictions are formalized for the site.
Furthermore, Stipulation No. 3 requires an average building setback of 40 feet,
minimum 20 feet for up to 25 percent of the frontage along 34th Avenue. This latter
stipulation will ensure that multi-story buildings are primarily kept a larger distance
away from nearby single-family residential properties west of 34th Avenue.
Stipulation No. 4 recommends that a minimum 20-foot building setback be provided
along the north property line for the multifamily-zoned portion of the site to require a
larger separation between residential buildings and I-10 freeway.
Staff is not recommending a stipulation to require general conformance to the
conceptual site plan for the proposed multifamily zoning due to potential variances
Page 255
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
required for parking reductions or site plan modifications for the front landscape
setback and associated site modifications triggered by constructing a cul-de-sac at
the terminus of 34th Avenue. Variances are reviewed and recommended at the
discretion of the Zoning Adjustment Hearing Officer (ZAHO) via a public hearing
process.
However, staff is recommending a stipulation to require general conformance to the
conceptual site plan for the convenience store and fuel station portion of the site.
This is addressed in Stipulation No. 17. Furthermore, staff is recommending a
stipulation to require administrative review of the site plan and building elevations of
the future commercial site, Lot 2, by the Planning Hearing Officer prior to preliminary
site plan approval. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 18.
7. Elevations
The conceptual building elevations for the proposed multifamily-zoned portion of the
site depict a modern-style architecture with flat roofs, large windows, patios and
four-sided architecture. These building elevations depict a maximum building height
of three stories and 36 feet.
The conceptual building elevations for the proposed convenience store and fuel
station depict a modern-style architecture with retro elements such as awnings,
decorative roof band, brick, and four-sided architecture. These building elevations
depict a maximum building height of one story and 20 feet.
Conceptual Building Elevations, Source: Otak Architects, Inc.
Page 256
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
Conceptual Building Elevations, Source: QuikTrip Corporation
Conceptual Building Elevations, Source: QuikTrip Corporation
Staff is recommending a stipulation to require that building elevations within the
multifamily-zoned portion of the site incorporate a variety of colors, materials and
architectural features. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 5, in addition to requiring
a minimum of 25 percent of building elevations oriented towards 34th Avenue and
Falcon Park, to provide accent materials that exhibit quality and durability that will
withstand weather conditions into the future. Furthermore, Stipulation No. 5 requires
that balconies and windows be provided for residential units adjacent to Falcon Park
in order to “place eyes on the park” to provide visual consistency.
In Stipulation No. 6, staff recommends that balconies on the upper floors of
multifamily buildings within 60 feet of the front property line be prohibited, unless
these are oriented away from single-family residential homes. This will help to
provide a transition between the single-family and multifamily residential uses.
Staff is recommending general conformance with the building elevations for the
convenience store and fuel station in Stipulation No. 17, while Stipulation No. 18
would require the administrative review of the building elevations for the future
commercial site, Lot 2, by the Planning Hearing Officer prior to preliminary site plan
approval to ensure that a variety of colors, materials and architectural features are
incorporated.
Page 257
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
8. Landscaping and Screening
In order to best integrate the proposed land uses and avoid conflicts with existing or
future land uses proposed on the site, several landscaping and screening
enhancements are recommended by staff.
Stipulation No. 7 recommends an average 10-foot wide landscape setback along the
north property line of the proposed multifamily-zoned portion of the site with
evergreen trees to help screen the I-10 freeway from residential buildings per
Stipulation No. 8. This stipulation also recommends evergreen trees along 34th
Avenue and the western property line to screen residential buildings from adjacent
single-family homes and the proposed convenience store.
Conceptual Site Plan with Planning and Development Department annotations,
Source: Otak Architects, Inc.
Stipulation No. 8 also recommends landscape enhancements that include providing
50-percent 2-inch caliper and 50-percent 3-inch caliper trees within the required
landscape setbacks on the proposed multifamily-zoned portion of the site. This
enhancement will help further screen the proposed residential buildings from
existing and proposed uses, plus the I-10 freeway.
Stipulation No. 19, applicable on the proposed commercially-zoned portion of the
site, requires a minimum 20-foot wide landscape setback planted with minimum 2-
inch caliper evergreen trees along the future eastern property line adjacent to the
proposed multifamily zoning. This will help buffer and screen commercial uses from
the future residential uses on the eastern portion of the site.
Page 258
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
9. Open Space and Amenities
The conceptual site plan depicts a central amenity area with numerous amenities
dispersed throughout the multifamily-zoned portion of the development. Stipulation
No. 9 recommended by staff requires a centralized amenity and open space area
and that a minimum of the following be provided for residents:
x Tot lot;
x Clubhouse or community room;
x Two picnic areas each with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a picnic
table; and
x Two benches or seating features.
10. Streetscape and Fencing Enhancements
The subject site is located at the junction of an arterial street (35th Avenue), freeway
(Interstate 10) and public park (Falcon Park), in addition to a local street (34th
Avenue). In order to promote further beautification of the Estrella Village and
enhance the development area, staff recommends several stipulations that will help
achieve this vision.
Stipulation No. 10 recommends entryway enhancements along 34th Avenue that
include pedestrian pathways, landscape enhancements and alternative driveway
materials to promote a sense of place for the multifamily-zoned portion of the site.
Stipulation Nos. 11 and 12 address fencing requirements for the multifamily zoned
portion of the site specifically. These include a minimum six-foot tall solid wall along
the north property line to screen residential uses from the adjacent I-10 freeway,
plus open view fencing limitations along 34th Avenue and Falcon Park in order to
promote visibility to adjacent streets plus the public park to “place eyes on the
street” (and park).
Stipulation No. 13 addresses building construction within the multifamily-zoned
portion of the site. This stipulation would require a decibel rating inside of residential
units, given the adjacent I-10 freeway, in order to reduce noise in these units.
Stipulation No. 29 addresses perimeter wall enhancements for the entire site where
these are visible from public streets and Falcon Park to promote beautification of the
development area.
STUDIES AND POLICIES
11. Estrella Village Plan
The Estrella Village Plan adopted in 1999, outlines a vision for improving the Estrella
Village through five main goals that include:
Page 259
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
1. Orderly growth;
2. Identifiable village core;
3. Strong residential neighborhoods;
4. Variety of homes and jobs; and
5. Consistent streetscapes and trail linkages.
Goal 3 of the Estrella Village Plan, “Protection of residential neighborhoods”,
Objective A, “New Residential Development”, recommends that new residential
developments and retail centers be supported by street circulation systems and
surrounding character. Bounded by a major arterial street, freeway and within
proximity to a future high-capacity station, the proposed C-2 and R-4A zoning
districts allow uses that could be supported by the existing street and future planned
transit infrastructure. Thirty-fourth Avenue is classified as a local street that currently
acts as a collector street, providing access to Falcon Park and single-family
neighborhoods east of 34th Avenue.
Estrella Village Plan Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
Development Department
Page 260
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
Goal 3, Objective D, “Residential areas in transition”, recommends that
neighborhoods no longer viable for residential use will be converted to non-
residential activity in a manner least disruptive to remaining residents. The existing
zoning on the site is R-5 and R1-6, with a proposed zoning of C-2 and R-4A. This
zoning application will allow for the arterial street frontage of the property to be used
for commercial uses along a corridor where similar uses exist. The eastern portion
of the site is proposed to remain as a residential use with multifamily zoning. Staff
recommends several stipulations, as noted previously in the report, to buffer and
screen future multifamily uses from existing single-family neighborhoods in the area
to allow for a land use transition.
Goal 4, “Housing and Employment”, Objective B, “Variety of housing densities and
types”, recommends a diversity of housing products in the Estrella Village. The
proposed R-4A zoning along the eastern portion of the site allows for a variety of
residential uses on the site, including a multi-story apartment housing product as
depicted in the conceptual site plan. This zoning district will introduce a new land
use in the immediate area, allowing for new housing opportunities to existing and
new residents within close proximity to transportation and high-capacity transit.
Goal 5, “Urban Design”, recommends for streetscape and trail systems to be
uniform and consistent to provide identity and linkage between neighborhoods and
with activity centers. Several stipulations as recommended by staff and described
previously in this report, would promote enhanced urban design along the
streetscapes.
12. Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program
The Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping Program adopted in 1999, provides
a landscape palette for arterial streets within the Estrella Village to help establish the
community’s character. In addition to providing planting guidelines, the plan also
indicates the locations to establish entry gateways that welcome individuals entering
the village with an entry sign and an enhanced landscape area of 75 feet by 75 feet
in size.
The subject site is adjacent to 35th Avenue, an arterial street, and thus staff
recommends Stipulation No. 20 to require adherence with the Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program requirements along the street frontage to
promote the community’s character. Furthermore, the southeast corner of 35th
Avenue and Interstate 10 is a designated Village gateway. Thus, staff recommends
Stipulation No. 21 to require a landscaped gateway entry feature at this intersection.
Page 261
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
Conceptual Landscaped Gateway feature, Source: Harrington Planning + Design
13. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan is a roadmap for creating a healthier, more livable
and prosperous 21st Century desert city. The goal is to treat the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and
development process. Staff recommends several stipulations to promote the
shading and cooling of uncovered parking lots and pedestrian walkways on both the
commercial and multifamily-zone portions of the site, plus the bus stop along 35th
Avenue. These shading standards are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 22, 30, and 31.
Additionally, staff recommends that the detached sidewalk along 35th Avenue, be
shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using minimum 2-inch caliper trees at maturity.
This is addressed in Stipulation No. 24.
14. Complete Streets Guidelines
The City's complete streets policy further advances its goal to create a more
sustainable transportation system that is safe and accessible for everyone.
Complete streets provide infrastructure that encourages active transportation such
as walking, bicycling, transportation choices and increased connectivity. Through
this policy, the primary focus of street design will no longer be solely on the speed
and efficiency of automobile travel, but on the safety and comfort of all users.
Page 262
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
To promote walking, staff recommends a system of pedestrian thoroughfares that
connects building entrances, active open space areas, adjacent public sidewalks
and the bus stop along 35th Avenue. A centralized pedestrian pathway connecting
the proposed multifamily-zoned portion of the site with 35th Avenue will help future
residents of this new community to use public transportation and high-capacity
transit along 35th Avenue. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 32.
To promote bicycling, staff recommends that bicycle parking be provided for both
the commercial and multifamily-zoned portions of the site for customers or residents
and their guests. A bicycle repair station in the multi-family zoned portion of the site
will also help to promote bicycling as alternative transportation method to help
decrease vehicular trips. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 33.
Stipulation No. 24, requires a shaded detached sidewalk along 35th Avenue to help
promote walking and other alternative methods of transportation along this corridor.
15. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. Bicycle
lanes have been designated within Roosevelt Street, south of Falcon Park. Staff
recommends that secure/covered bicycle parking be provided at a rate of one
bicycle space per 0.25 dwelling units up to 20 spaces, and inverted U-bicycle
spaces per residential building for guests and customers. A bicycle repair station
within the multifamily-zoned portion of the site will also promote alternative
transportation by future residents. Bicycle parking and amenities are addressed in
Stipulation No. 33.
16. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, industrial, and mixed-use
developments meeting certain criteria. No provisions for recycling containers were
depicted on the site plans for the commercial or multifamily-zoned portion of the site.
However, the applicant’s submittal documents indicate that recycling containers may
be incorporated as part of the multifamily-zoned portion of the site pending further
review.
17. Housing Phoenix
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing with
Page 263
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased housing
options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid
population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000
new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a
primary reason why housing costs are increasing. The proposed development
supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030 by
contributing to a variety housing types that will address the supply shortage at a
more rapid pace while using vacant land in a more sustainable fashion.
Stipulation No. 1 would limit the maximum density to 98 dwelling units on the
proposed multifamily-zoned portion of the site, but if affordable housing units
provided, the developer may construct up to 200 dwelling units on this portion of the
site. If this development is approved, it would allow a new type of housing product in
the area and new housing opportunities for existing and new residents to the area.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
18. As of the writing of this report, staff received one letter in support and one letter in
opposition with concerns about the development. The letter of concern cited issues
with the construction of a fuel station at this site due to fears of increased crime and
environmental concerns for existing residents. The letter of support cited the
proposed fuel station and available services as a positive use of the property.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
19. The Water Services Department commented that the property has existing water
and sewers mains that can potentially serve the development along 35th Avenue
and/or 34th Avenue. In addition, the Water Services Department commented that
capacity is a dynamic condition that can change over time due to a variety of factors.
20. The Floodplain Management division of the Public Works Department did not have
any comments pertaining to this request as the parcel is not located in a Special
Flood Hazard Area (SFHA).
21. The Fire Department commented that the project shall comply with the 2018
International Fire Code with Phoenix Amendments. Other comments provided
pertained to fire apparatus access, turning radiuses, fire hydrant spacing, water
supply and operational permits. These comments will be addressed in the site plan
review process, along with other development review comments.
22. The Public Transit Department requires right-of-way and retention of the bus stop
pad along 35th Avenue; bus stop shading of 50 percent minimum; accessible
pedestrian pathways that connect all building entrances and exits, bus stop, and all
public sidewalks utilizing the minimum possible distance; and pedestrian paths and
sidewalks shaded a minimum of 75 percent using trees or shade structures. Lastly,
Page 264
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
that pedestrian pathways be constructed of decorative material that contrasts with
the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces. These are addressed in site plan
review and Stipulation Nos. 22, 23, 24 and 32.
23. The Street Transportation Department requires the dedication of right-of-way along
34th Avenue and 35th Avenue with related improvements, cul-de-sac construction
along the 34th Avenue terminus, driveway access control along 35th Avenue, cross-
access agreement along the commercial portion of site, pedestrian HAWK signal
along 35th Avenue, Red Border letter notification to the Arizona Department of
Transportation (ADOT), and construction of all streets within and adjacent to the
development per ADA standards. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 14, 15,
16, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 34 and 35.
24. The Aviation Department requires that the property owner record a Notice to
Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport in order to disclose the existence,
and operational characteristics of City of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
(PHX) to future owners or tenants of the property. Furthermore, that an avigation
easement is dedicated to the City of Phoenix as this property is within the PHX
International Airport traffic pattern airspace and seeking a noise sensitive land use.
These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 36 and 37.
OTHER
25. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. If
further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site and
immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous archaeological
projects have been conducted within this project area, it is recommended that
archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted. Phase II
archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based upon the results
of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this determination in consultation
with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event archaeological materials are
encountered during construction, all ground disturbing activities must cease within a
33-foot radius of the discovery and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be
notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 38 through 40.
26. The Historic Preservation Office commented that this U.S. Naval and Marine Corps
Reserve Training Center is historically significant under Criterion A, at the local
level, for its association with the U.S. Military, more specifically with those efforts to
create a reserve training and recruitment center for the Navy and Marines in
Phoenix. Thus, the property is subject to a subject to a 30-calendar day hold prior to
the issuance of a demolition permit, since it is a non-single family building over 50
years old.
Page 265
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
27. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements such as obtaining a
use permit to conduct the proposed outdoor use in this zoning district. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be
required.
Findings
1. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map designation of
Mixed Use, proposed with concurrent case GPA-EST-1-21-4.
2. As stipulated, this development will allow affordable housing to be developed in this
part of the Estrella Village and within proximity to a public park, high-capacity transit,
and employment opportunities in the Southwest Phoenix Major Employment center.
3. As stipulated, the requested C-2 and R-4A zoning is consistent with surrounding
land uses and will allow for an appropriate transition between commercial uses
along 35th Avenue and single-family residential uses east of 34th Avenue.
4. The proposed development is consistent with the scale and character of
developments approved or existing in the surrounding area while balancing
employment and housing opportunities within close proximity to future high-capacity
transit.
Stipulations
R-4A ZONED AREA
1. For the R-4A portion of the site, the maximum building height and density shall
not exceed 30 feet and 98 dwelling units. If the following conditions are met,
the maximum height and density shall be 40 feet and 200 dwelling units. The
conditions must be met prior to or in conjunction with the Final Site Plan
Review.
a. A minimum of 75 percent of the housing units are dedicated for long-
term affordability, as approved by the Phoenix Housing Department.
b. The applicant shall submit a copy of the draft Declaration of
Affirmative Land use and Restrictive Covenants agreement (LURA),
for review and approval by the Phoenix Housing Department.
c. The applicant shall submit a copy of the Proforma, for review and
approval by the Phoenix Housing Department.
Page 266
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the R-4A portion of the site, the
applicant shall submit a copy of the Recorded Declaration of Affirmative Land
use and Restrictive Covenants agreement (LURA), as approved by the State
Housing Department, if conditions listed in Stipulation No.1 for additional height
and density are pursued.
3. An average building setback of 40 feet, minimum 20 feet for up to 25 percent of
the frontage, shall be provided along 34th Avenue.
4. A minimum 20-foot building setback shall be provided along the north property
line of the residentially zoned portion of the site.
5. Residential building elevations shall be developed to the following standards,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department:
a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent
materials and textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such
as brick, stone, colored textured concrete, stucco, painted steel or
other materials to provide a decorative and aesthetic treatment, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
b. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to a public park or street,
shall contain a minimum of 25 percent brick, masonry, stone or
another exterior accent material that exhibits quality and durability.
c. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, pop-outs,
recesses, variation in window size and location, pitched roofs and/or
overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department
d. Balconies and windows shall be provided for residential units adjacent
to a public park.
6. There shall be no balconies on the upper floors of residential buildings located
within 60 feet of the front property line which are oriented toward single-family
residential homes not part of this development, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
7. An average landscape setback of 10 feet, minimum 5 feet for up to 50 percent
of the property line, shall be provided along the north property line.
Page 267
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
8. The required landscape setbacks for the residentially zoned portion of the site
shall be planted with minimum 50-percent 2-inch caliper and 50-percent 3-inch
caliper large canopy drought-tolerant evergreen trees, 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
9. A central amenity and open space area shall be provided within close proximity
to the primary vehicular entrance into the development. The following
amenities shall be provided at a minimum and may be dispersed throughout
the development, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:
a. Tot lot;
b. Clubhouse or community room;
c. Two picnic areas each with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a
picnic table; and
d. Two benches or seating features.
10. Vehicular entryways to the residential portion of the development along 34th
Avenue shall include the following elements, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department:
a. Pedestrian pathways connecting the interior of the development to the
public sidewalks on one side of the vehicular driveway at minimum.
b. The pedestrian pathways shall be lined with landscape areas on both
sides and planted with drought-tolerant plant materials providing
seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover.
c. A mix of ornamental shrubs and flower beds that will maintain a
constant bloom throughout the year and 75 percent live cover, shall
be provided along the entryway.
d. The driveway surface shall be constructed of decorative pavers,
stamped or colored concrete, or another material, other than those
used to pave the parking surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
11. A perimeter wall no less than 6 feet in height shall be provided along the
Interstate 10 freeway within the residentially zoned portion of the site. This wall
shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face
block with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 268
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
12. Except where required by the Zoning Ordinance, perimeter walls adjacent to a
public street or public park shall be limited to open view wrought iron fencing or
a combination of 2-foot solid masonry topped by wrought iron open view
fencing, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The indoor noise levels of residential units shall not exceed a decibel day
night-level (DNL) of 45 decibels and that along with the building plans
submitted for Phoenix Building Construction Code compliance review to the
Planning and Development Department there shall be a sealed and signed
analysis by an engineer licensed in Arizona with a proficiency in residential
sound mitigation or noise control. The engineer shall note in the analysis that
the building design is capable of achieving the required Noise Level Reduction.
14. A minimum five-foot-wide sidewalk along 34th Avenue shall be detached with a
minimum five-foot-wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back
of curb and shall include minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy
drought-tolerant shade trees planted a minimum of 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings between the sidewalk and back of curb, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
15. The developer shall dedicate minimum 25-feet of right-of-way and construct
the west side of 34th Avenue for the full limits of the project, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
16. If the portion of 34th Avenue north of Moreland Street is not approved to be
abandoned through a separate process, the developer shall provide a 50-foot
radius cul-de-sac termination at 34th Avenue, north of Moreland Avenue, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
C-2 ZONED AREA
17. The development shall be in general conformance with the conceptual site plan
date stamped June 30, 2021 and building elevations date stamped May 16,
2021 for the C-2 portion of the site, except as described below and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
18. The conceptual site plan and elevations for Lot 2, as depicted in the site plan
for the overall site date stamped June 30, 2021, shall be administratively
reviewed by the Planning Hearing Officer prior to preliminary site plan approval
with specific regard to the inclusion of the below elements. This review is for
conceptual purposes only. Specific development standards and requirements
will be determined by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 269
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
a. Location and orientation of buildings and trash receptables in
relation to the residentially zoned property to the east.
b. Accessible pedestrian pathways that connect building entrances,
public sidewalks, and the pedestrian pathway connecting the
commercially zoned property to the residentially zoned property to
the east using the most direct route for pedestrians.
c. Pedestrian connection between adjacent commercial parcels.
d. All elevations of the building/s shall contain architectural
embellishments and detailing, such as: textural changes, pilasters,
offsets, recesses, variation in window size or location, overhang
canopies, or similar features.
19. A minimum 20-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the east
side of the site where adjacent to a residential zoning district. This landscape
setback shall be planted with a minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy evergreen
trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
20. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards along
arterial streets in the Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
21. A landscaped gateway entry feature shall be provided on the southeast corner
of 35th Avenue and Interstate 10 as described below and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department:
a. An average 75-foot by 75-foot landscape entryway that adheres to the
landscape palette for gateway entry features in the Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program.
b. A minimum 300-square foot landscaped accent area shall be
provided. The landscaped accent area shall provide a visually unique
character with drought-tolerant plant materials providing seasonal
interest and 75 percent live cover.
c. The gateway entry feature shall utilize accents, colors and materials
consistent with the theme of the commercial uses on the same site,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 270
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
22. The bus stop pad along 35th Avenue shall be shaded to a minimum of 50
percent using shade trees at full maturity, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
23. Public Transit Department shall retain right-of-way and bus stop pads on
northbound 35th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
24. All sidewalks along 35th Avenue shall be detached with a landscape strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent Cross
Section of the Street Classification Map and planted to the following standards,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant
shade trees to provide shade to a minimum 75 percent at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation designed to grow to a maximum
mature height of 24 inches and achieve 75 percent live coverage.
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise
provided herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial
Street Landscaping Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
25. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50-feet of right-of-way and construct
the east half of 35th Avenue for the full limits of the project, per Cross Section
D standards identified on the City of Phoenix Street Classification Map, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
26. Driveway access control to the site will be permitted as approved by the Traffic
Impact Study submitted to the Street Transportation Department by providing a
sealed Traffic Impact Study analyzing access control and proposed mitigation
for conflicting turning movements along 35th Avenue.
27. The site shall provide recorded cross-access agreements between lots one
and two as depicted on the conceptual site plan date stamped June 30, 2021,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 271
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
28. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the developer shall work with the Office
of Pedestrian Safety in the Street Transportation Department to evaluate a
HAWK crossing at the southern boundary of the site within 35th Avenue. The
developer shall be responsible for funding any identified improvements
including the HAWK crossing, as determined by the Street Transportation
Department, but generally to be located between Moreland Street and Portland
Street.
R-4A AND C-2 ZONED AREAS
29. All perimeter walls visible from street right-of-way and adjacent to the public
park shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split
face block with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs or other
alternatives if full view fencing is proposed, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
30. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper large canopy drought tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be
dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at
maturity, as approved by Planning and Development Department.
31. Pedestrian walkways connecting the commercial sites and residentially zoned
property to the east, public sidewalks, and walkways within the residentially
zoned portion of the site shall be shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using
shade trees at maturity and/or architectural shade, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
32. A system of pedestrian thoroughfares shall be provided as described below
and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department:
a. The developer shall provide a minimum of one centralized
pedestrian pathway connecting the public sidewalk along 35th
Avenue passing through Lot 1 to the public sidewalk along 34th
Avenue passing through Lot 3, as depicted in the site plan for the
overall site date stamped June 30, 2021. Each phase of the project
will construct the portion of the pedestrian path along their
development.
b. Illuminated pedestrian scale lighting per Section 1304.H.5 for the
centralized pedestrian pathway.
Page 272
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
c. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway
shall be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored
concrete, or other pavement treatments that visually contrasts
parking and drive aisle surfaces. Vehicular crossings shall be kept
to a minimum.
d. Connections to/between via the most direct route:
(1) All building entrances;
(2) Active open space areas;
(3) Adjacent public sidewalks; and
(4) Bus stop along 35th Avenue.
33. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. “Secure/Covered Facilities” bicycle parking shall be provided at a
rate of 0.25 spaces per dwelling unit on the residential portion of
the site, up to a maximum of 20 spaces, as defined in Appendix K
of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.
b. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided
through Inverted U and/or artistic racks located near the building
entrance of each enclosed commercial and residential building and
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix
Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.
c. One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and
maintained in the residentially zoned portion of the site within a
central amenity area or along a centralized pedestrian pathway.
The bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an
area of high visibility and separated from vehicular maneuvering
areas, where applicable. The repair station shall include: standard
repair tools affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump affixed to
the base of the station or the ground; and a bicycle repair stand
which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while making
adjustments to the bike.
Page 273
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
34. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
35. A Red Border Letter shall be processed for this development, as determined by
the Planning and Development Department.
36. The developer shall record a Notice of Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to
Airport in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) to future owners or tenants of
the property.
37. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
38. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
39. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
40. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
Writer
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
July 14, 2021
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Exhibits
Sketch Map
Aerial Map
Conceptual Site Plan for Lot 1 date stamped June 30, 2021
Conceptual Building Elevations for Lot 1 date stamped March 16, 2021
Conceptual Overall Site Plan date stamped June 30, 2021
Page 274
Staff Report: Z-2-21-4
July 14, 2021
Conceptual Building Elevations for Lot 3 date stamped June 15, 2021
Gateway Corner Feature date stamped March 16, 2021
Community Correspondence (2 pages)
Page 275
R-5
R1-6
Z-SP-23-67
Z-10-05
34TH DR
LYNWOOD ST
35TH DR
R-3
36TH DR
WILLETTA ST
C-3
T R1-6
ER S
CULV Z-11-05
§
¦
¨
R-3
R1-6 I10 RMP
R1-6
MORELAND ST
R-2
35TH AVE
34TH AVE
LATHAM ST R-5
36TH AVE
PORTLAND ST
R-3
C-1
ROOSEVELT ST
I
Miles
VAN BUREN ST
I-10
Z-2-21
I-17
BUCKEYE RD
0.085 0.0425 0 0.085
ESTRELLA VILLAGE LOWER BUCKEYE RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4 BROADWAY RD
43RD AVE 35TH AVE 27TH AVE 19TH AVE
51ST AVE
SR 202 (Proposed)
67TH AVE
SOUTHERN AVE
75TH AVE
91ST AVE 83RD AVE
99TH AVE
107TH AVE 59TH AVE
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
QuikTrip Corporation
FROM:
R-5 ( 2.41 a.c.)
5/11/2021
R1-6 ( 6.98 a.c)
DATE:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-2-21 REVISION DATES:
6/30/2021
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
C-2 ( 3.72 a.c.)
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
9.39 Acres QS 12-21 G-6 TO: R-4A ( 5.67 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
R-5, R1-6 105, 37 126, 45
C-2, R-4A 54, 494 64, N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-2-21.mxd
Page 276
R-5
R1-6
Z-SP-23-67
Z-10-05
34TH DR
LYNWOOD ST
35TH DR
R-3
36TH DR
WILLETTA ST
C-3
T R1-6
ER S
CULV Z-11-05
§
¨
¦
R-3
R1-6 I10 RMP
R1-6
MORELAND ST
R-2
35TH AVE
34TH AVE
LATHAM ST R-5
36TH AVE
PORTLAND ST
R-3
C-1
ROOSEVELT ST
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
I
Miles
VAN BUREN ST
I-10
Z-2-21
I-17
BUCKEYE RD
0.085 0.0425 0 0.085
ESTRELLA VILLAGE LOWER BUCKEYE RD
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 4 BROADWAY RD
43RD AVE 35TH AVE 27TH AVE 19TH AVE
51ST AVE
SR 202 (Proposed)
67TH AVE
SOUTHERN AVE
75TH AVE
91ST AVE 83RD AVE
99TH AVE
107TH AVE 59TH AVE
APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
QuikTrip Corporation
FROM:
R-5 ( 2.41 a.c.)
5/11/2021
R1-6 ( 6.98 a.c)
DATE:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-2-21 REVISION DATES:
6/30/2021
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
C-2 ( 3.72 a.c.)
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
9.39 Acres QS 12-21 G-6 TO: R-4A ( 5.67 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
R-5, R1-6 105, 37 126, 45
C-2, R-4A 54, 494 64, N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-2-21.mxd
Page 277
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Q Q
W MCDOWELL RD
N
I-10
P W MORELAND ST P
PROJECT NO.:07641
N 34TH AVE
W ROOSEVELT ST
N N 37TH AVE
N 35TH AV
N 33RD AVE N 31ST AVE N
W FILMORE ST
Vicinity Map
M M
L L
K 1201 N 35TH AVE K
PHOENIX, AZ
J J
• • • •• • • • • • • • ••• • •• ••••••••••••••••••••
SUBMERGED
PUMP
MORELAND PROBE FILL
VENT/
VAPOR ANNULAR
H STREET H
• • • •• • • • • • • • ••• • •• ••••••••••••••••••••
SUBMERGED
PUMP
VENT/
PROBE FILL
VAPOR ANNULAR
FFE 1073.70
Page 278
• • • •• • • • • • • •• ••• • •• •••••••••••••••••••••
SUBMERGED
PAD 1073.10
PUMP
VENT/
PROBE FILL
VAPOR ANNULAR
G3S (P-103)
G STORE NO.: 1419 G
• • • •• • • • •• • ••• • •• ••••••••••••••••••• 5,002 S.F.
SUBMERGED
BLDG. HT.= 20'-0"
PUMP
VENT/
• ••• • • • • •• • • •• • •• • • •• •• • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROBE FILL
VAPOR ANNULAR
ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION,
SITE DATA (QUIKTRIP STORE) PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN
WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN.
• • • •• •• • • • ••• • •• ••••••••••••••••••
SUBMERGED
PUMP
VENT/ PROTOTYPE: P-103 (08/01/20)
35TH AVENUE
PROBE FILL
VAPOR ANNULAR
F DIVISION: F
VERSION: 001
SITE LEGEND DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
REVIEWED BY:
E E
PT
ADA
D
SITE D
DESCRIPTION
C C
DATE ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE:
REV
SHEET TITLE:
B N CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN B
SHEET NUMBER:
20 10 0 20 40 • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
A A
33.00'
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Page 279
),1,6+ 0$18)$&785(5 63(&,),&$7,21
%521=(6721( ,17(567$7(%5,&. $7/$66758&785$/%5,&.
0,'1,*+7 ,17(567$7(%5,&. $7/$66758&785$/%5,&.
%586+('$/80,180 5(<12%21' )$6&,$
475(' 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 67$1',1*6($0$:1,1*
5('32/<&$5%21$7( $//(1,1'8675,(6 ,//80,1$7('%$1'
47%52:1 6+(5:,1:,//,$06 0(7$/3$,17
%/$&. $//&2857)$%5,&6 32/<3520(6+
&/5 $//(1,1'8675,(6 6,*1$*(
*5$1,7( 672 $*(,)6
,'% $//(1,1'8675,(6 ,//80,1$7('6,*1$*(
Page 280
$33529('
,
7+20$65'
:0&'2:(//5'
,
67+$9(
:9$1%85(167
2WDN$UFKLWHFWV,QF
67+$9( 67+$9( 67+$9(
6:7KLUG$YHQXH6XLWH
3RUWODQG25
:0&'2:(//5'
, ZZZRWDNFRP
:/2:(5%8&.(<(5'
9,&,1,7<0$3
+&
352-(&7'$7$
3('(675,$1
$31 3257,212) 5287(
6,7($5($ *5266 64)7 $& 3('(675,$1
6,7($5($ 1(7 64)7 $& *$7(
(;,67,1*=21,1* 5
352326('=21,1* 5$
/27&29(5$*( 64)7
&20021$5($ 0,1 64)7
'(16,7< '864)70$; $//2:('
+(,*+7/,0,7 ¶ +&
6(7%$&.6
+&
¶)52176(7%$&.
¶6,'(<$5'6(7%$&.
¶5($56(7%$&.
68%0(5*('
3URSHUW\2ZQHU,QIRUPDWLRQ
%($9(572125
68%0(5*('
352326('352-(&7 *6 3
6725(12
68%0(5*('
%/'*+7
'(16,7<
'864)7 68%0(5*('
+&
9(17
352%( ),//
9$325 $118/$5
Page 281
/27&29(5$*(
&20021$5($
180%(52)%8,/',1*6 (SOH[5HDOW\//&
5(6,'(17,$/%8,/',1*6
$0(1,7<%8,/',1*6
*5266%8,/',1*$5($ 64)7 Unnamed
%8,/',1*+(,*+7 ¶
180%(52)6725,(6
7<3(2)&216758&7,21 7<3(9$
$8720$7,&635,1./,(56
6WK$YHQXH*RRG\HDU$UL]RQD
<(6
6:6&+2//6
81,70,;
%('5220
)(55<5'
%('5220
BLACKBIRD FARMS - BUILDINGS 1A, 1B, & 1C
6,7(3/$1
&$6(12*3$(67 =
6,7(3/$1
6&$/(¶ ¶
727$/81,76
TITLE
$33529$/6 $XWKRU
3$5.,1* DRAWN BY
3$5.,1*5(48,5('
1
3$5.,1*3529,'('
DATE
PROJECT NUMBER
$
© 2017
21 OTAK, INC.
,IWKLVGUDZLQJLVOHVVWKDQ[LWKDV
24 36
EHHQUHGXFHG6FDOHDFFRUGLQJO\
75$6+(1&/2685('(7$,/6
&,7<2)3+2(1,;
2WDN$UFKLWHFWV,QF
6: 7KLUG$YHQXH6XLWH
3RUWODQG25
ZZZRWDNFRP
a
a
`
`
_
_
^
^
]
]
\
\
[
[
X
X
b c d e f R P h i R k i
g j
b c d e f R P h i R k i
g j
Page 282
6:6&+2//6
)(55<5'
%($9(572125
8QQDPHG
%/$&.%,5')$506 %8,/',1*6$% &
a
a
`
`
_
_
^
^
7,7/(
]
]
\
\
[
[
$XWKRU
X
X
'5$:1%<
O P Q R P Q Q R
'$7(
Q R S
T
352-(&7180%(5
b c d e f R P h i R k i
g j
b c d e f R P h i R k i
g j
27$.,1&
,IWKLVGUDZLQJLVOHVVWKDQ[LWKDV
EHHQUHGXFHG6FDOHDFFRUGLQJO\
Page 283
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
To: PDD Zoning
Subject: RE: rezoning case
From:noͲreply@phoenix.gov
Sent:Wednesday,January27,20215:24AM
To:PDDDevelopmentServices
Subject:emplandsdͲFormSubmission
FROM:JavierMedrano
SUBJECT:QTgasstation35thavenueandIͲ10rezoningcasenumberZͲ2Ͳ21
MESSAGE:Goodmorning
TodayIamsendingthisemailaboutthetheQTproposallocatednearourneighborhood.Ispoketoafewneighborsand
weopposeanygasstationbeingbuildonthedecommissionedmilitarynavalcomplexbecausewecametoconclusion
thatitwillattractevenmorecrimetoourneighborhood.Wealreadyhavecrimeinourneighborhoodandthisgas
stationwillonlyattractmuchmorecrime.Wealsoopposethegasstationbecauseoftheharmfulvaporsofthegas
beingreleasedwhenvehiclesfuelupandthetankertrucksreplenishingthegasstationwillreleasegasvaporsintothe
airandwebelieveitwillbeharmfultoourhealth.Wesuggestsomethingpositivetobebuildinthedecommissioned
militarycomplex.Thankyoufortakingthetimeinreadingthisemail.
Sincerely
JavierMedrano
Email:jav2028042@maricopa.edu
AREA:602
PHONE:3346905
ADDRESS:3317W.LathamSt
CITY:Phoenix
STATE:AZ
ZIP:85009
SubmissionID:334ea42de5064bcebb59b0b146e553f8
FormSubmissionOn:1/27/20215:24:03AM
Referer:https://phoenix.gov/pdd
Page 284
From: Jim Schillinger
To: Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc: charles@huellmantel.com
Subject: QuickTrip Rezoning case SEC 35th Ave and I-10 - Application No: Z-2-21
Date: Saturday, January 23, 2021 4:22:58 PM
I own a house nearby at 3340 W Portland. I would be in favor of this rezoning. Directly on 35th Avenue
would be well suited for a QuickTrip, and provide some needed competition for the Circle K across the
street.
However, most importantly, QuickTrip will be able to provide nearby residence a high-quality shopping
experience for not only gasoline purchase, but a myriad of other products that make QuickTip a popular
place for people to purchase various drinks and snacks.
The customer experience at a QuickTrip is unmatched compared to any other competitor, the stores I visit
in Phoenix (about 1/week) are always neat and clean, along with courteous, responsible employees.
QuickTrip's presence here would be a wonderful addition to the area!
I enthusiastically support this change in rezoning!
Thanks for the opportunity to respond to this rezoning case.
Jim Schillinger 602-622-6333
Page 285
Attachment C
ADDENDUM A
Staff Report Z-2-21-4
July 20, 2021
Estrella Village Planning July 20, 2021
Committee Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date August 5, 2021
Request From: R1-6 (6.98 acres) and R-5 (2.41 acres)
Request To: C-2 (3.72 acres) and R-4A (5.67 acres)
Proposed Use Multifamily and commercial uses including a
convenience store with fuel station
Location Southeast corner of 35th Avenue and
Interstate 10
Owner Eplex Realty, LLC
Applicant QuikTrip Corportation
Representative Huellmantel & Affiliates, Charles Huellmantel
Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations
On July 14, 2021, the applicant submitted a revised site plan for Lot 1, the proposed
convenience store site, removing a pedestrian pathway segment northeast of the
proposed convenience store building that connects Lots 1 and 3, the proposed
multifamily zoned portion of the site. The applicant proposes to maintain a centralized
pedestrian connection between 34th Avenue and 35th Avenue via a centralized
pedestrian pathway as depicted on the revised conceptual site plan for Lot 1, date
stamped July 14, 2021 and the overall site plan date stamped June 30, 2021.
Due to a change in the conceptual site plan for Lot 1 as described previously, the
following stipulation is recommended to be modified:
x Stipulation No. 17 regarding the conceptual site plan for Lot 1 date stamped July
14, 2021;
Staff recommends approval per the modified stipulations in bold font below:
Page 286
Addendum A Staff Report Z-2-21-4
July 20, 2021
R-4A ZONED AREA
1. For the R-4A portion of the site, the maximum building height and density shall
not exceed 30 feet and 98 dwelling units. If the following conditions are met,
the maximum height and density shall be 40 feet and 200 dwelling units. The
conditions must be met prior to or in conjunction with the Final Site Plan
Review.
a. A minimum of 75 percent of the housing units are dedicated for long-
term affordability, as approved by the Phoenix Housing Department.
b. The applicant shall submit a copy of the draft Declaration of
Affirmative Land use and Restrictive Covenants agreement (LURA),
for review and approval by the Phoenix Housing Department.
c. The applicant shall submit a copy of the Proforma, for review and
approval by the Phoenix Housing Department.
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the R-4A portion of the site, the
applicant shall submit a copy of the Recorded Declaration of Affirmative Land
use and Restrictive Covenants agreement (LURA), as approved by the State
Housing Department, if conditions listed in Stipulation No.1 for additional height
and density are pursued.
3. An average building setback of 40 feet, minimum 20 feet for up to 25 percent of
the frontage, shall be provided along 34th Avenue.
4. A minimum 20-foot building setback shall be provided along the north property
line of the residentially zoned portion of the site.
5. Residential building elevations shall be developed to the following standards,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department:
a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent
materials and textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such
as brick, stone, colored textured concrete, stucco, painted steel or
other materials to provide a decorative and aesthetic treatment, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
b. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to a public park or street,
shall contain a minimum of 25 percent brick, masonry, stone or
another exterior accent material that exhibits quality and durability.
Page 287
Addendum A Staff Report Z-2-21-4
July 20, 2021
c. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, pop-outs,
recesses, variation in window size and location, pitched roofs and/or
overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department
d. Balconies and windows shall be provided for residential units adjacent
to a public park.
6. There shall be no balconies on the upper floors of residential buildings located
within 60 feet of the front property line which are oriented toward single-family
residential homes not part of this development, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
7. An average landscape setback of 10 feet, minimum 5 feet for up to 50 percent
of the property line, shall be provided along the north property line.
8. The required landscape setbacks for the residentially zoned portion of the site
shall be planted with minimum 50-percent 2-inch caliper and 50-percent 3-inch
caliper large canopy drought-tolerant evergreen trees, 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
9. A central amenity and open space area shall be provided within close proximity
to the primary vehicular entrance into the development. The following
amenities shall be provided at a minimum and may be dispersed throughout
the development, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:
a. Tot lot;
b. Clubhouse or community room;
c. Two picnic areas each with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a
picnic table; and
d. Two benches or seating features.
10. Vehicular entryways to the residential portion of the development along 34th
Avenue shall include the following elements, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department:
a. Pedestrian pathways connecting the interior of the development to the
public sidewalks on one side of the vehicular driveway at minimum.
b. The pedestrian pathways shall be lined with landscape areas on both
sides and planted with drought-tolerant plant materials providing
seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover.
Page 288
Addendum A Staff Report Z-2-21-4
July 20, 2021
c. A mix of ornamental shrubs and flower beds that will maintain a
constant bloom throughout the year and 75 percent live cover, shall
be provided along the entryway.
d. The driveway surface shall be constructed of decorative pavers,
stamped or colored concrete, or another material, other than those
used to pave the parking surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
11. A perimeter wall no less than 6 feet in height shall be provided along the
Interstate 10 freeway within the residentially zoned portion of the site. This wall
shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face
block with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.
12. Except where required by the Zoning Ordinance, perimeter walls adjacent to a
public street or public park shall be limited to open view wrought iron fencing or
a combination of 2-foot solid masonry topped by wrought iron open view
fencing, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The indoor noise levels of residential units shall not exceed a decibel day
night-level (DNL) of 45 decibels and that along with the building plans
submitted for Phoenix Building Construction Code compliance review to the
Planning and Development Department there shall be a sealed and signed
analysis by an engineer licensed in Arizona with a proficiency in residential
sound mitigation or noise control. The engineer shall note in the analysis that
the building design is capable of achieving the required Noise Level Reduction.
14. A minimum five-foot-wide sidewalk along 34th Avenue shall be detached with a
minimum five-foot-wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back
of curb and shall include minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy
drought-tolerant shade trees planted a minimum of 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings between the sidewalk and back of curb, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
15. The developer shall dedicate minimum 25-feet of right-of-way and construct
the west side of 34th Avenue for the full limits of the project, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
16. If the portion of 34th Avenue north of Moreland Street is not approved to be
abandoned through a separate process, the developer shall provide a 50-foot
radius cul-de-sac termination at 34th Avenue, north of Moreland Avenue, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 289
Addendum A Staff Report Z-2-21-4
July 20, 2021
C-2 ZONED AREA
17. The development shall be in general conformance with the conceptual site plan
date stamped June 30, 2021 JULY 14, 2021 and building elevations date
stamped May 16, 2021 for the C-2 portion of the site, except as described
below and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
18. The conceptual site plan and elevations for Lot 2, as depicted in the site plan
for the overall site date stamped June 30, 2021, shall be administratively
reviewed by the Planning Hearing Officer prior to preliminary site plan approval
with specific regard to the inclusion of the below elements. This review is for
conceptual purposes only. Specific development standards and requirements
will be determined by the Planning and Development Department.
a. Location and orientation of buildings and trash receptables in
relation to the residentially zoned property to the east.
b. Accessible pedestrian pathways that connect building entrances,
public sidewalks, and the pedestrian pathway connecting the
commercially zoned property to the residentially zoned property to
the east using the most direct route for pedestrians.
c. Pedestrian connection between adjacent commercial parcels.
d. All elevations of the building/s shall contain architectural
embellishments and detailing, such as: textural changes, pilasters,
offsets, recesses, variation in window size or location, overhang
canopies, or similar features.
19. A minimum 20-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the east
side of the site where adjacent to a residential zoning district. This landscape
setback shall be planted with a minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy evergreen
trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
20. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street
Landscaping Program landscape palette and landscaping standards along
arterial streets in the Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
21. A landscaped gateway entry feature shall be provided on the southeast corner
of 35th Avenue and Interstate 10 as described below and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department:
a. An average 75-foot by 75-foot landscape entryway that adheres to the
landscape palette for gateway entry features in the Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program.
Page 290
Addendum A Staff Report Z-2-21-4
July 20, 2021
b. A minimum 300-square foot landscaped accent area shall be
provided. The landscaped accent area shall provide a visually unique
character with drought-tolerant plant materials providing seasonal
interest and 75 percent live cover.
c. The gateway entry feature shall utilize accents, colors and materials
consistent with the theme of the commercial uses on the same site,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
22. The bus stop pad along 35th Avenue shall be shaded to a minimum of 50
percent using shade trees at full maturity, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
23. Public Transit Department shall retain right-of-way and bus stop pads on
northbound 35th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
24. All sidewalks along 35th Avenue shall be detached with a landscape strip
located between the sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent Cross
Section of the Street Classification Map and planted to the following standards,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant
shade trees to provide shade to a minimum 75 percent at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation designed to grow to a maximum
mature height of 24 inches and achieve 75 percent live coverage.
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise
provided herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial
Street Landscaping Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
25. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50-feet of right-of-way and construct
the east half of 35th Avenue for the full limits of the project, per Cross Section
D standards identified on the City of Phoenix Street Classification Map, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
26. Driveway access control to the site will be permitted as approved by the Traffic
Impact Study submitted to the Street Transportation Department by providing a
sealed Traffic Impact Study analyzing access control and proposed mitigation
for conflicting turning movements along 35th Avenue.
Page 291
Addendum A Staff Report Z-2-21-4
July 20, 2021
27. The site shall provide recorded cross-access agreements between lots one
and two as depicted on the conceptual site plan date stamped June 30, 2021,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
28. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the developer shall work with the Office
of Pedestrian Safety in the Street Transportation Department to evaluate a
HAWK crossing at the southern boundary of the site within 35th Avenue. The
developer shall be responsible for funding any identified improvements
including the HAWK crossing, as determined by the Street Transportation
Department, but generally to be located between Moreland Street and Portland
Street.
R-4A AND C-2 ZONED AREAS
29. All perimeter walls visible from street right-of-way and adjacent to the public
park shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split
face block with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs or other
alternatives if full view fencing is proposed, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
30. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-
inch caliper large canopy drought tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be
dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at
maturity, as approved by Planning and Development Department.
31. Pedestrian walkways connecting the commercial sites and residentially zoned
property to the east, public sidewalks, and walkways within the residentially
zoned portion of the site shall be shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using
shade trees at maturity and/or architectural shade, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
32. A system of pedestrian thoroughfares shall be provided as described below
and as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department:
a. The developer shall provide a minimum of one centralized
pedestrian pathway connecting the public sidewalk along 35th
Avenue passing through Lot 1 to the public sidewalk along 34th
Avenue passing through Lot 3, as depicted in the site plan for the
overall site date stamped June 30, 2021. Each phase of the project
will construct the portion of the pedestrian path along their
development.
b. Illuminated pedestrian scale lighting per Section 1304.H.5 for the
centralized pedestrian pathway.
Page 292
Addendum A Staff Report Z-2-21-4
July 20, 2021
c. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway
shall be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored
concrete, or other pavement treatments that visually contrasts
parking and drive aisle surfaces. Vehicular crossings shall be kept
to a minimum.
d. Connections to/between via the most direct route:
(1) All building entrances;
(2) Active open space areas;
(3) Adjacent public sidewalks; and
(4) Bus stop along 35th Avenue.
33. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. “Secure/Covered Facilities” bicycle parking shall be provided at a
rate of 0.25 spaces per dwelling unit on the residential portion of
the site, up to a maximum of 20 spaces, as defined in Appendix K
of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.
b. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided
through Inverted U and/or artistic racks located near the building
entrance of each enclosed commercial and residential building and
installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix
Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.
c. One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and
maintained in the residentially zoned portion of the site within a
central amenity area or along a centralized pedestrian pathway.
The bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an
area of high visibility and separated from vehicular maneuvering
areas, where applicable. The repair station shall include: standard
repair tools affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump affixed to
the base of the station or the ground; and a bicycle repair stand
which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while making
adjustments to the bike.
Page 293
Addendum A Staff Report Z-2-21-4
July 20, 2021
34. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.
35. A Red Border Letter shall be processed for this development, as determined by
the Planning and Development Department.
36. The developer shall record a Notice of Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to
Airport in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) to future owners or tenants of
the property.
37. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney
prior to final site plan approval.
38. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
39. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase
I data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.
40. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.
Writer
Enrique Bojórquez Gaxiola
July 20, 2021
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Exhibits
Conceptual Site Plan for Lot 1 date stamped July 14, 2021
Page 294
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Q Q
W MCDOWELL RD
N
I-10
P W MORELAND ST P
PROJECT NO.:07641
N 34TH AVE
W ROOSEVELT ST
N N 37TH AVE
N 35TH AV
N 33RD AVE N 31ST AVE N
W FILMORE ST
Vicinity Map
M M
L L
K 1201 N 35TH AVE K
PHOENIX, AZ
J J
• • • •• • • • • • • • ••• • •• ••••••••••••••••••••
SUBMERGED
PUMP
MORELAND PROBE FILL
VENT/
VAPOR ANNULAR
H STREET H
• • • •• • • • • • • • ••• • •• ••••••••••••••••••••
SUBMERGED
PUMP
VENT/
PROBE FILL
VAPOR ANNULAR
FFE 1073.70
Page 295
• • • •• • • • • • • •• ••• • •• •••••••••••••••••••••
SUBMERGED
PAD 1073.10
PUMP
VENT/
PROBE FILL
VAPOR ANNULAR
G3S (P-103)
G STORE NO.: 1419 G
• • • •• • • • •• • ••• • •• ••••••••••••••••••• 5,002 S.F.
SUBMERGED
BLDG. HT.= 20'-0"
PUMP
VENT/
• ••• • • • • •• • • •• • •• • • •• •• • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROBE FILL
VAPOR ANNULAR
ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION,
SITE DATA (QUIKTRIP STORE) PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR SALE IN
WHOLE OR IN PART, IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN.
• • • •• •• • • • ••• • •• ••••••••••••••••••
SUBMERGED
PUMP
VENT/ PROTOTYPE: P-103 (08/01/20)
35TH AVENUE
PROBE FILL
VAPOR ANNULAR
F DIVISION: F
VERSION: 001
SITE LEGEND DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
REVIEWED BY:
E E
PT
ADA
D
SITE D
DESCRIPTION
C C
DATE ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE:
REV
SHEET TITLE:
B N CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN B
SHEET NUMBER:
20 10 0 20 40 • • • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • •
A A
33.00'
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Attachment D
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-2-21-4
Date of VPC Meeting July 20, 2021
Request From R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District) (6.98 acres) and
R-5 (Multifamily Residence District) (2.41 acres)
Request To R-4A (Multifamily Residence District) (5.67 acres) and
C-2 (Intermediate Commercial District) (3.72 acres)
Proposed Use Multifamily and commercial uses including a
convenience store with fuel station
Location Southeast corner of 35th Avenue and I-10 freeway
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation in Addendum A
of the staff report
VPC Vote 7-0, motion passed; None in dissent.
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
Cases GPA-EST-1-21-4 and Z-2-21-4 were heard concurrently.
No requests to speak from members of the public were received.
Enrique Bojórquez, staff, introduced himself and provided a combined presentation
for companion cases GPA-EST-1-21-4 and Z-2-21-4. He discussed the location of
the site, noting surrounding land uses including a public park and the I-10 freeway.
He discussed the existing General Plan Land Use map designation of Public/Quasi-
Public and the requested Land Use map amendment to Mixed Use. He discussed
the surrounding zoning districts in the area, Estrella Village Plan, Estrella Village
Arterial Street Landscaping Program and other policy documents including the
General Plan. Future high-capacity transit efforts were discussed, pertaining to the
Capitol/I-10 West extension and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line along 35th Avenue.
The conceptual site plans for the proposed commercial and multifamily-zoned
portions of the site were shown, indicating the vehicular access points, centralized
pedestrian connection, plus open space and density proposed. The conceptual
building elevations and/or materials were discussed. He concluded the presentation
by providing a staff recommendation of approval on each case and describing the
proposed stipulations for case Z-2-21-4, as presented in Addendum A of the staff
report.
Charles Huellmantel, with Huellmantel and Affiliates, introduced himself as the
applicant and discussed the location of the site plus former use as a United States
Navy recruitment center. The location of the proposed C-2 and R-4A zoning was
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 296
discussed, including a history of awards based on residential development projects
completed. Images of previous multifamily projects were shown to illustrate the
character of the proposed residential community that is intended to be affordable
within the project site. The conceptual site plan and elevations for the proposed
commercial and multifamily zoning were shown and discussed. He concluded the
presentation by requesting approval of case GPA-EST-1-21-4 and Z-2-21-4.
Lisa Perez asked for clarification on what the ingress and egress southbound along
35th Avenue was going to be like.
Mr. Huellmantel stated that his team has worked with the Street Transportation
Department on future improvements along 35th Avenue. A streetlight might not be
warranted at this location due to the existing traffic that is already present on this
street.
Ms. Perez asked how other committee members felt about the proposal.
Vice Chair Parris Wallace stated that she has spoken with the applicant on
previous concerns that she had. She lives very close to the site and did have various
questions pertaining to this project, including whether the community will be
proposed residential community will be mixed-income or all affordable. She prefers
an all affordable housing community here, since affordable housing is very difficult to
come by. Other questions that she had pertained to site access and discussed the
impacts of the I-10 freeway to this community. She has no other concerns now but
does suggest that edible landscaping is utilized within the landscape areas.
Ms. Perez stated that the property is blighted and there is lots of traffic that already
exists in the area. She hopes that the project will be welcoming to the community.
Vice Chair Wallace stated that no major concerns have been discussed with her
from the community so far.
Dan Rush asked if a right-turn lane could be added along 35t Avenue to carry traffic
into the I-10 freeway.
Mr. Huellmantel responded that he is still working with the Street Transportation
Department regarding street improvements, but also wants to maintain good access
to their site along 35th Avenue. Furthermore, the Arizona Department of
Transportation (ADOT) also has control over street improvements near the I-10
ramp.
Chairman Cardenas asked for further discussion or individual motions on each
item.
MOTION – Z-2-21-4:
Mr. Cardenas motioned to approve case Z-2-21-4 per the staff recommendation in
Addendum A of the staff report. Ms. Perez seconded the motion to approve.
VOTE – Z-2-21-4:
7-0, motion passed; None in dissent.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 297
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 298
Attachment E
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
August 5, 2021
ITEM NO: 4
DISTRICT NO.: 4
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-2-21-4 (Companion Case GPA-EST-1-21-4)
Location: Southeast corner of 35th Avenue and I-10
From: R-5 and R1-6
To: C-2 and R-4A
Acreage: 9.39
Proposal: Multifamily and commercial uses including a service station with fuel and
convenience options.
Applicant: QuikTrip Corportation
Owner: Eplex Realty, LLC
Representative: Charles Huellmantel, Huellmantel & Affiliates
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations in the Addendum A Staff Report.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Estrella 7/20/2021 Approval, per the staff recommendation in the Addendum A Staff Report.
Vote: 7-0.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee
recommendations, with an additional stipulation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Johnson made a MOTION to approve Z-2-21-4, per the Estrella
Village Planning Committee recommendation, with the additional stipulation as read into the
record.
Maker: Johnson
Second: Gaynor
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Gorraiz and Magnum
Opposition Present: Yes
Findings:
1. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map designation of Mixed
Use, proposed with concurrent case GPA-EST-1-21-4.
2. As stipulated, this development will allow affordable housing to be developed in this
part of the Estrella Village and within proximity to a public park, high-capacity transit,
and employment opportunities in the Southwest Phoenix Major Employment center.
3. As stipulated, the requested C-2 and R-4A zoning is consistent with surrounding land
uses and will allow for an appropriate transition between commercial uses along 35th
Avenue and single-family residential uses east of 34th Avenue.
Page 299
4. The proposed development is consistent with the scale and character of developments
approved or existing in the surrounding area while balancing employment and housing
opportunities within close proximity to future high-capacity transit.
Stipulations:
R-4A ZONED AREA
1. For the R-4A portion of the site, the maximum building height and density shall not
exceed 30 feet and 98 dwelling units. If the following conditions are met, the
maximum height and density shall be 40 feet and 200 dwelling units. The conditions
must be met prior to or in conjunction with the Final Site Plan Review.
a. A minimum of 75 percent of the housing units are dedicated for long-term
affordability, as approved by the Phoenix Housing Department.
b. The applicant shall submit a copy of the draft Declaration of Affirmative Land
use and Restrictive Covenants agreement (LURA), for review and approval
by the Phoenix Housing Department.
c. The applicant shall submit a copy of the Proforma, for review and approval by
the Phoenix Housing Department.
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the R-4A portion of the site, the applicant
shall submit a copy of the Recorded Declaration of Affirmative Land use and
Restrictive Covenants agreement (LURA), as approved by the State Housing
Department, if conditions listed in Stipulation No.1 for additional height and density
are pursued.
3. An average building setback of 40 feet, minimum 20 feet for up to 25 percent of the
frontage, shall be provided along 34th Avenue.
4. A minimum 20-foot building setback shall be provided along the north property line of
the residentially zoned portion of the site.
5. Residential building elevations shall be developed to the following standards, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department:
a. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and
textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone,
colored textured concrete, stucco, painted steel or other materials to provide
a decorative and aesthetic treatment, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
b. Building elevations adjacent and oriented to a public park or street, shall
contain a minimum of 25 percent brick, masonry, stone or another exterior
accent material that exhibits quality and durability.
c. All building elevations shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, pop-outs, recesses, variation in
window size and location, pitched roofs and/or overhang canopies, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Page 300
d. Balconies and windows shall be provided for residential units adjacent to a
public park.
6. There shall be no balconies on the upper floors of residential buildings located within
60 feet of the front property line which are oriented toward single-family residential
homes not part of this development, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
7. An average landscape setback of 10 feet, minimum 5 feet for up to 50 percent of the
property line, shall be provided along the north property line.
8. The required landscape setbacks for the residentially zoned portion of the site shall
be planted with minimum 50-percent 2-inch caliper and 50-percent 3-inch caliper
large canopy drought-tolerant evergreen trees, 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
9. A central amenity and open space area shall be provided within close proximity to the
primary vehicular entrance into the development. The following amenities shall be
provided at a minimum and may be dispersed throughout the development, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department:
a. Tot lot;
b. Clubhouse or community room;
c. Two picnic areas each with a barbeque grill, shade ramada and a picnic table;
and
d. Two benches or seating features.
10. Vehicular entryways to the residential portion of the development along 34th Avenue
shall include the following elements, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department:
a. Pedestrian pathways connecting the interior of the development to the public
sidewalks on one side of the vehicular driveway at minimum.
b. The pedestrian pathways shall be lined with landscape areas on both sides
and planted with drought-tolerant plant materials providing seasonal interest
and 75 percent live cover.
c. A mix of ornamental shrubs and flower beds that will maintain a constant
bloom throughout the year and 75 percent live cover, shall be provided along
the entryway.
d. The driveway surface shall be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or
colored concrete, or another material, other than those used to pave the
parking surfaces, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
11. A perimeter wall no less than 6 feet in height shall be provided along the Interstate 10
freeway within the residentially zoned portion of the site. This wall shall include
material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a
Page 301
decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
12. Except where required by the Zoning Ordinance, perimeter walls adjacent to a public
street or public park shall be limited to open view wrought iron fencing or a
combination of 2-foot solid masonry topped by wrought iron open view fencing, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The indoor noise levels of residential units shall not exceed a decibel day night-level
(DNL) of 45 decibels and that along with the building plans submitted for Phoenix
Building Construction Code compliance review to the Planning and Development
Department there shall be a sealed and signed analysis by an engineer licensed in
Arizona with a proficiency in residential sound mitigation or noise control. The
engineer shall note in the analysis that the building design is capable of achieving the
required Noise Level Reduction.
14. A minimum five-foot-wide sidewalk along 34th Avenue shall be detached with a
minimum five-foot-wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of
curb and shall include minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-
tolerant shade trees planted a minimum of 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings between the sidewalk and back of curb, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
15. The developer shall dedicate minimum 25 feet of right-of-way and construct the west
side of 34th Avenue for the full limits of the project, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.
16. If the portion of 34th Avenue north of Moreland Street is not approved to be
abandoned through a separate process, the developer shall provide a 50-foot radius
cul-de-sac termination at 34th Avenue, north of Moreland Avenue, as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.
C-2 ZONED AREA
17. The development shall be in general conformance with the conceptual site plan date
stamped June 30, 2021 JULY 14, 2021 and building elevations date stamped May 16,
2021 for the C-2 portion of the site, except as described below and as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
18. The conceptual site plan and elevations for Lot 2, as depicted in the site plan for the
overall site date stamped June 30, 2021, shall be administratively reviewed by the
Planning Hearing Officer prior to preliminary site plan approval with specific regard to
the inclusion of the below elements. This review is for conceptual purposes only.
Specific development standards and requirements will be determined by the Planning
and Development Department.
a. Location and orientation of buildings and trash receptables in relation to the
residentially zoned property to the east.
b. Accessible pedestrian pathways that connect building entrances, public
sidewalks, and the pedestrian pathway connecting the commercially zoned
Page 302
property to the residentially zoned property to the east using the most direct
route for pedestrians.
c. Pedestrian connection between adjacent commercial parcels.
d. All elevations of the building/s shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing, such as: textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in
window size or location, overhang canopies, or similar features.
19. A minimum 20-foot wide landscape setback shall be provided along the east side of
the site where adjacent to a residential zoning district. This landscape setback shall
be planted with a minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy evergreen trees, 20 feet on
center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
20. The development shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program landscape palette and landscaping standards along arterial streets in the
Estrella Village, except as otherwise noted herein, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
21. A landscaped gateway entry feature shall be provided on the southeast corner of 35th
Avenue and Interstate 10 as described below and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:
a. An average 75-foot by 75-foot landscape entryway that adheres to the
landscape palette for gateway entry features in the Estrella Village Arterial
Street Landscaping Program.
b. A minimum 300-square foot landscaped accent area shall be provided. The
landscaped accent area shall provide a visually unique character with
drought-tolerant plant materials providing seasonal interest and 75 percent
live cover.
c. The gateway entry feature shall utilize accents, colors and materials
consistent with the theme of the commercial uses on the same site, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
22. The bus stop pad along 35th Avenue shall be shaded to a minimum of 50 percent
using shade trees at full maturity, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.
23. Public Transit Department shall retain right-of-way and bus stop pads on northbound
35th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
24. All sidewalks along 35th Avenue shall be detached with a landscape strip located
between the sidewalk and back of curb following the most recent Cross Section of the
Street Classification Map and planted to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade
trees to provide shade to a minimum 75 percent at maturity.
b. Drought tolerant vegetation designed to grow to a maximum mature height of
24 inches and achieve 75 percent live coverage.
Page 303
c. The landscape palette and planting standards, unless otherwise provided
herein, shall conform with the Estrella Village Arterial Street Landscaping
Program requirements for arterial streets.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment.
25. The developer shall dedicate minimum 50-feet of right-of-way and construct the east
half of 35th Avenue for the full limits of the project, per Cross Section D standards
identified on the City of Phoenix Street Classification Map, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
26. Driveway access control to the site will be permitted as approved by the Traffic
Impact Study submitted to the Street Transportation Department by providing a
sealed Traffic Impact Study analyzing access control and proposed mitigation for
conflicting turning movements along 35th Avenue.
27. The site shall provide recorded cross-access agreements between lots one and two
as depicted on the conceptual site plan date stamped June 30, 2021, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
28. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the developer shall work with the Office of
Pedestrian Safety in the Street Transportation Department to evaluate a HAWK
crossing at the southern boundary of the site within 35th Avenue. The developer shall
be responsible for funding any identified improvements including the HAWK crossing,
as determined by the Street Transportation Department, but generally to be located
between Moreland Street and Portland Street.
R-4A AND C-2 ZONED AREAS
29. All perimeter walls visible from street right-of-way and adjacent to the public park shall
include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or split face block with a
decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs or other alternatives if full view
fencing is proposed, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
30. All uncovered surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped with minimum 2-inch
caliper large canopy drought tolerant shade trees. Landscaping shall be dispersed
throughout the parking area and achieve 25 percent shade at maturity, as approved
by Planning and Development Department.
31. Pedestrian walkways connecting the commercial sites and residentially zoned
property to the east, public sidewalks, and walkways within the residentially zoned
portion of the site shall be shaded to a minimum of 75 percent using shade trees at
maturity and/or architectural shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
32. A system of pedestrian thoroughfares shall be provided as described below and as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department:
a. The developer shall provide a minimum of one centralized pedestrian
pathway connecting the public sidewalk along 35th Avenue passing through
Lot 1 to the public sidewalk along 34th Avenue passing through Lot 3, as
Page 304
depicted in the site plan for the overall site date stamped June 30, 2021. Each
phase of the project will construct the portion of the pedestrian path along
their development.
b. Illuminated pedestrian scale lighting per Section 1304.H.5 for the centralized
pedestrian pathway.
c. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces.
Vehicular crossings shall be kept to a minimum.
d. Connections to/between via the most direct route:
(1) All building entrances;
(2) Active open space areas;
(3) Adjacent public sidewalks; and
(4) Bus stop along 35th Avenue.
33. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
a. “Secure/Covered Facilities” bicycle parking shall be provided at a rate of 0.25
spaces per dwelling unit on the residential portion of the site, up to a
maximum of 20 spaces, as defined in Appendix K of the Comprehensive
Bicycle Master Plan.
b. A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted
U and/or artistic racks located near the building entrance of each enclosed
commercial and residential building and installed per the requirements of
Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City
of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle
Master Plan.
c. One bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained in
the residentially zoned portion of the site within a central amenity area or
along a centralized pedestrian pathway. The bicycle repair station (“fix it
station”) shall be provided in an area of high visibility and separated from
vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The repair station shall
include: standard repair tools affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump
affixed to the base of the station or the ground; and a bicycle repair stand
which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely while making adjustments to
the bike.
34. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
Page 305
35. A Red Border Letter shall be processed for this development, as determined by the
Planning and Development Department.
36. The developer shall record a Notice of Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport
in order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport (PHX) to future owners or tenants of the property.
37. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix for
the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City Attorney prior to final site
plan approval.
38. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing
and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
39. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I data
testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, determines
such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II
archeological data recovery excavations.
40. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.
41. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER
SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE
AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Angie
Holdsworth at (602) 495-5622, TTY use 7-1-1.
Page 306
Report
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
Item text
Amend Downtown Code Density Map, Buffer Alley Map and Townsend Park
Character Area Development Standards (Ordinance G-6891)
Request for a public hearing for a proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance,
Text Amendment Z-TA-7-19-8, amending Chapter 12, Section 1202.D. (Regulating
Maps, Density Map) to amend the density provisions for a site located approximately
160 feet south of the southeast corner of 3rd Street and McDowell Road; amending
Section 1202.F. (Regulating Maps, Buffer Alley Map) to remove the buffer alleys in an
area generally bounded by 3rd and 5th streets, Willetta Street and McDowell Road;
and amending Section 1220 (Townsend Park) to allow a height bonus.
Summary
The intent of this proposed text amendment is to amend Chapter 12, Section 1202.D.
(Regulating Maps, Density Map) to increase the allowable density from a maximum of
43.5 dwelling units per acre to 125 dwelling units per acre for a site located
approximately 160 feet south of the southeast corner of 3rd Street and McDowell
Road; amend Section 1202.F. (Regulating Maps, Buffer Alley Map) to remove the
buffer alley designation in an area general bounded by 3rd and 5th streets, Willetta
Street and McDowell Road; and amend Section 1220 (Townsend Park) to allow a
height bonus up to 30 percent using the sustainability bonus.
Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in Exhibit A of
the Staff Report (Attachment B).
VPC Info: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this case for information
only on March 9, 2020 (Attachment C).
DSC Action: The Design Standards Committee heard this case and recommend
approval, per the staff recommendation with a modification to the density provisions to
allow a maximum of 89 dwelling units per acre of this item on April 14, 2020 by a vote
of 4-0 (Attachment D).
VPC Action: The Central City Village Planning Committee heard this case on July 12,
2021 and recommend approval, per the staff recommendation by a vote of 10-1
(Attachment E).
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Aug. 5, 2021 and
Page 307
recommended approval, per the Central City Village Planning Committee
recommendation by a vote of 7-0 (Attachment F).
Location
Approximately 160 feet south of the southeast corner of 3rd Street and McDowell
Road.
Council District: 8
Parcel Addresses: 1411, 1419 and 1427 N. 3rd St.
Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Planning and
Development Department.
Page 308
ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE G-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PORTION OF THE CODE
OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, PART II,
CHAPTER 41, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF PHOENIX BY AMENDING CHAPTER 12, SECTION
1202.D. (REGULATING MAPS, DENSITY MAP) TO
AMEND DENSITY PROVISIONS, SECTION 1202.F.
(REGULATING MAPS, BUFFER ALLEY MAP) TO
REMOVE BUFFER ALLEYS AND SECTION 1220.B.
(TOWNSEND PARK, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) TO
ADD A HEIGHT BONUS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as
follows:
That Chapter 12, Section 1202.D. (Regulating Maps, Maximum Density) is
amended to increase the density of a site located approximately 160 feet south of the
southeast corner of 3rd Street and McDowell Road from 43.5 maximum dwelling units
per acre to 125, by removing the old map and inserting the new map as follows:
Page 309
D. The density for any parcel in the Downtown Area shall not exceed the following
unless a density bonus is allowed by the Character Area and approved by the
Planning and Development Department staff or an appeal is approved by the
Design Review Committee (DRC) pursuant to Section 1223 requirements:
***
Page 310
SECTION 2: That Chapter 12, Section 1202.F. (Regulating Maps, Buffer
Alleys) is amended to remove the buffer alley designation in an area generally bounded
by 3rd Street to 5th Street, and Willetta Street to McDowell Road, by removing the old
map and inserting the new map as follows:
F. This map designates Buffer Alleys for which abutting property owners must conform
to the standards and guidelines outlined in Sections 1207.O and P:
Page 311
***
SECTION 3: That Chapter 12, Section 1220. (Townsend Park) is amended
to add a height bonus as follows:
***
B. Development Standards.
1. Maximum height.
a. Main building: Governed by the height map, Section 1202.C.
(1) Height bonus: None. MAXIMUM 30% INCREASE.
Page 312
***
PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 8th day of September, 2021.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Cris Meyer, City Attorney
By:
_________________________
_________________________
REVIEWED BY:
_________________________
Ed Zuercher City Manager
Page 313
Attachment B
Staff Report
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
Z-TA-7-19-8
April 9, 2020
Application No. Z-TA-7-19-8: Amend Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance to replace the Downtown Code maps to amend density provisions
and buffer alleys in an area generally bounded by 3rd Street to 5th Street, and Willetta
Street to McDowell Road and amend Section 1220 (Townsend Park) to allow for a
height bonus.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-7-19-8 as shown in the
recommended text in Exhibit A.
Background Figure A: Character Areas
This request is to amend the allowable density to 125
dwelling units per acre on the site, remove two buffer Subject Site
alley designations adjacent to the site and allow for a
height increase of up to 30 percent in the Townsend
Park Character Area using the sustainability bonus
provisions listed in Section 1223 of the Zoning
Ordinance. The proposed development is located
approximately 160 feet south of the southeast corner of
3rd Street and McDowell Road in the Townsend Park
Character Area. The Townsend Park Character Area is
primarily intended to transition between the McDowell Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
Development Department
Corridor Character Area to the north, the Downtown
Figure B: Site Context
Gateway Character Area to the west, and the East
Evergreen Character Area to the east. The vision of the
Townsend Park Character Area is to connect adjacent
areas by incorporating mixed-use/mid-rise
developments with a focus on office and cultural
facilities. The Townsend Park Character Area is near
the light rail corridor and the City’s largest public library.
The buildings on the site are currently used as offices
and previously housed single and multifamily
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
residences.
Development Department
Page 314
Staff Report Z-TA-7-19-8
April 9, 2020
Page 2
The current regulating maps of Figure C: Height and Density Designations
the Downtown Code permit a
maximum density of 43.5
dwelling units per acre and a
maximum height of 65 feet on
the proposed development site.
The current maximum density
and height was determined by
the previous zoning, R-5 RI
(Multifamily Residence District,
Residential Infill District), prior to
the adoption of the Downtown
Code in 2010. One buffer alley
runs along the north side of the
proposed development and the
other runs in between the two Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development
parcels on the site from 3rd Department
Street to 5th Street, connecting to the adjacent East Evergreen Historic District. Buffer
alleys are intended to mitigate impacts on single-family residences from more intense
uses by requiring additional setback, screening and lighting requirements.
To the west, across 3rd Street, is the Arizona School for the Arts. The Downtown Code
designates 125 dwelling units per acre and 90 feet in height allowed on the site. To the
north is a Taco Bell fast food restaurant with allowable density of 14.5 dwelling units per
acre and 30 feet of allowable height. To the east are two low-rise multifamily
developments and a single-family residence used as an office. One of the multifamily
developments and the single-family home are part of the East Evergreen Historic
District. The allowable density is 43.5 dwelling units per acre and the allowable height to
the east is 65 feet. To the south is a two to three-story multifamily development with 65
feet of allowable height and 43.5 dwelling units per acre in allowable density.
Page 315
Staff Report Z-TA-7-19-8
April 9, 2020
Page 3
Background: Urban Form Project and the Downtown Code
Figure D: Downtown Phoenix Plan
The Downtown Urban Form Project was initiated Character Area
in 2006. The Downtown Phoenix Plan is a
product of the Downtown Phoenix Urban Form
Project and was prepared to provide direction for
implementation of the community vision for an
active, pedestrian-oriented and sustainable
Downtown. The Downtown Phoenix Plan was
adopted by City Council in 2008 and served as a
precursor to the Downtown Code, adopted in
2010, which is now Chapter 12 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
The vision for how the Townsend Park Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
Development Department
Character area will develop as listed in the
Downtown Phoenix Plan is that “The Townsend Park Character Area will be
predominantly a residential neighborhood incorporating a historic district and a new
mixed-use/mid-rise area” (pg. 3-25) and lists three policies that address specific issues
or opportunities unique to the planning area. The three polices for the Townsend Park
Character Area are:
Policy 3-21: Develop height transition strategies to protect and enhance the
quality of East Evergreen Historic District
Policy 3-22: Increase building height west of 3rd Street to provide a transition
between the Light Rail Corridor and the historic district of East Evergreen
Policy 3-23: New development should maintain the existing streetscape patterns
to preserve the character of the area.
Background: Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy Framework
The Transit Oriented Development Strategic Policy Framework, originally adopted in
2013, identifies policies and place types that are designed to shape walkable and
mixed-use environments and focus redevelopment within a half-mile of high capacity
transit stations. The site is located a quarter mile from the McDowell Road and Central
Avenue light rail station. The identified environment for the McDowell Road and Central
Avenue light rail station area is Major Urban Center. Major Urban Center is a place type
characterized by medium to high intensity with building heights typically from four to
eight stories, with incentive heights of up to fifteen stories.
Page 316
Staff Report Z-TA-7-19-8
April 9, 2020
Page 4
Figure E: TOD Strategic Policy Framework Place Type
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
Staff Analysis
Density
The proposal to increase the allowable density to 125 dwelling units per acre is
consistent and sensitive to the nature of the Townsend Park Character Area. The
majority of the properties within the Townsend Park Character Area are allowed a
density of 125 dwelling units per acre. The proposal to increase the allowable density is
consistent with the density designation to the west of the proposed development, across
3rd Street, and is consistent with the transitional nature of the Character Area from the
higher density allowances of the Downtown Gateway Character Area to the west and
the lower density allowances of the McDowell Corridor to the north and the East
Evergreen Character Area to the east.
The Walkable Urban Code is a zoning option applicable to properties outside of the
Downtown Code that are within the Transit Oriented Development Policy Plan Districts
located along the light rail corridor. As mentioned previously, the site is located a
quarter mile from the McDowell Road and Central Avenue light rail station. If the project
was not within the Downtown Code zoning district, the Walkable Urban Code would
allow the physical form, building design, and lot standards to dictate the allowable
density on the site without the need to specify a maximum allowable density. The site is
also located within walking distance of the Margaret T. Hance Park and the Burton Barr
Central Library. Increasing the scale and intensity for projects near cultural amenities is
also consistent with the City’s transit-oriented development policy and goals.
Page 317
Staff Report Z-TA-7-19-8
April 9, 2020
Page 5
Figure F: Maximum Density Existing and Proposed
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
There was a previous request within the Townsend Park Character Area to increase the
allowable density on a site. North of the proposed development at the northwest corner
of 3rd Street and McDowell Road, is a parcel that previously housed the Los Olivos Car
Wash. In 2017, case Z-TA-1-17-4 changed the allowable density from 14.5 dwelling
units per acre to 89 dwelling units per acre.
Height
The request does not increase the height allowed in the Townsend Park Character Area
by right, rather it creates the opportunity for projects to achieve more height by providing
community benefits through sustainability bonus points. The proposal to increase the
allowable height by a sustainability bonus provision is consistent with the Major Urban
Center TOD Strategic Policy Framework place type, the Downtown Phoenix Plan
policies, and provides for a public benefit that is sensitive to the surrounding area.
Page 318
Staff Report Z-TA-7-19-8
April 9, 2020
Page 6
Major Urban Center is a place type characterized by Figure G: Maximum Height
medium to high intensity with building heights
typically from four to eight stories, with incentive
heights of up to fifteen stories. The proposal to
increase the allowable height up to 30 percent using
a sustainability bonus, which would allow up to eight
stories in height for the proposed development, is
consistent with the place type of the Central
Avenue/McDowell Road light rail station area.
The proposed amendment meets the policies in the
Downtown Phoenix Plan for the Townsend Park
Character Area.
Policy 3-21: Develop height transition
strategies to protect and enhance the quality
of East Evergreen Historic District Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
Development Department
The sustainability bonus point category with the most
possible credits calls for structures with HP or HPL zoning within the Downtown Code to
be rehabilitated. The height transition strategy incentivizes the preservation of historic
structures in exchange for an increase in allowable height, which could protect and
enhance the quality of East Evergreen Historic District.
Policy 3-22: Increase building height west of 3rd Street to provide a transition
between the Light Rail Corridor and the historic district of East Evergreen
The proposal maintains the existing height transition in the Character Area which calls
for higher building heights west of 3rd Street to lower heights east of 3rd Street by not
amending the height map, but rather by allowing the opportunity for more height by
sustainability bonus points that is sensitive to the existing height allocations. With the
proposed text amendment, properties originally designated for 65 feet in height could
increase the allowable height up to 84.5 feet, which is shorter than the maximum height
designation of 90 feet allowed by right in the Character Area west of 3rd Street. The
height transition and integrity of the Character Area is maintained by the proposed text
amendment.
Buffer Alleys
Buffer alleys are intended to mitigate impacts on single-family residences from more
intense uses by requiring additional setback, screening and lighting requirements. There
are no single-family residences abutting the alleys in between McDowell Road and
Willetta Street from 3rd Street to 5th Street. Several sites were once used as single-
family residences but have been converted to commercial spaces. The request to
remove the buffer alley designation is consistent with the existing uses and character of
Page 319
Staff Report Z-TA-7-19-8
April 9, 2020
Page 7
the area and could provide more opportunities for sites along McDowell Road to
redevelop.
Figure H: Existing and Proposed Buffer Alleys
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
Conclusion
Staff recommends approval of Z-TA-7-19-8 to amend the density map, buffer alley map,
and Townsend Park Character Area text as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
The proposal maintains the transitional nature of the Townsend Park Character Area,
situated between the Downtown Gateway, McDowell Corridor and East Evergreen
Character Areas. Additional density and option for more height is warranted given the
proposed development’s proximity to the McDowell Road and Central Avenue light rail
station. The proposal is in line with the adopted Major Urban Center place type of the
TOD Strategic Policy Framework and the policies of the Downtown Phoenix Plan. The
sustainability bonus option maintains the existing height transition in the Townsend Park
Character Area and offers community benefits in exchange for the option for additional
height. The buffer alley removal is consistent with the existing uses and character of the
area.
Page 320
Staff Report Z-TA-7-19-8
April 9, 2020
Page 8
Writer
Sarah Stockham
April 9, 2020
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Exhibits
A. Proposed Language and Maps
Page 321
EXHIBIT A
Application No. Z-TA-7-19: Amend Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance to replace the Downtown Code maps to amend density provisions
and buffer alleys in an area generally bounded by 3rd Street to 5th Street, and Willetta
Street to McDowell Road and amend Section 1220 (Townsend Park) to allow for a
height bonus.
Staff Proposed Language That May Be Modified During the Public Hearing Process is
as follows:
Amend Chapter 12, Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) by removing the old maps, and
inserting new maps as follows:
***
Page 322
ATTACHMENT A
Z-TA-7-19
Page 2
D. The density for any parcel in the Downtown Area shall not exceed the following
unless a density bonus is allowed by the Character Area and approved by the
Planning and Development Department staff or an appeal is approved by the
Design Review Committee (DRC) pursuant to Section 1223 requirements:
Page 323
ATTACHMENT A
Z-TA-7-19
Page 3
***
Page 324
ATTACHMENT A
Z-TA-7-19
Page 4
F. This map designates Buffer Alleys for which abutting properties must conform to the
standards and guidelines outlined in Sections 1207.O and P:
Page 325
ATTACHMENT A
Z-TA-7-19
Page 5
***
Page 326
ATTACHMENT A
Z-TA-7-19
Page 6
Amend Chapter 12, Section 1220 (Townsend Park) to read as follows:
***
B. Development Standards
1. Maximum Height
a. Main building: Governed by the height map, Section 1202.C.
(1) Height bonus: None. MAXIMUM 30% INCREASE.
***
Page 327
Attachment C
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-7-19-8
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting: March 9, 2020
Amend Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance to replace the Downtown Code
maps to amend density provisions and buffer alleys in
Request: an area generally bounded by 3rd Street to 5th Street,
and Willetta Street to McDowell Road and amend
Section 1220 (Townsend Park) to allow for a height
bonus.
VPC DISCUSSION:
Chris Colyer recused himself, bringing the quorum to 16.
Two speaker cards were submitted in favor, wishing to speak.
One speaker card was submitted, wishing to speak.
Brennan Ray, representing the applicant with Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A., stated that
Leon Capital is a multifamily developer who is pursuing a high-quality project in an area
that lends itself to density with pedestrian engagement. Mr. Ray continued that the
project will have 228 residences at a density of 109 dwelling units per acre and be 85
feet tall. Mr. Ray added that the request is to amend the density map as this site is in
close proximity to many amenities and Central Avenue. Mr. Ray continued that the
second part of the request is to amend the buffer alley map to remove two buffer alleys
because buffer alleys require a fifteen-foot setback, a five-foot landscaped area and a
four-foot wall. Mr. Ray added that the plan for the site is to abandon the alley, dedicate
a public utility easement and keep in open as it is now. Mr. Ray continued that the
request is to allow for an increase in height via the sustainability bonus provisions in the
Code.
Chair Frazier Johnson asked about the unit mix and if any units will be affordable.
Brennan Ray responded that he expects there to be more studios and one-bedroom
apartments, and there will not be affordable units.
Will Gaona asked about the parking spaces and if there will be parking in the
neighborhood. Brennan Ray responded that the project will be parked to Code
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 328
standards, will include two levels of parking and residents will not park in the
neighborhood.
Vice Chair Pearl Starks asked what is currently in use on site. Brennan Ray
responded that the buildings are offices.
Eva Olivas asked for clarification on what was proposed for the alley. Brennan Ray
responded that they propose to abandon the alley under the proposed building, and that
the alley will be used in the same way it is now with the addition of a public utility
easement recorded in perpetuity along the alley.
Eva Olivas asked if the applicant has talked to the neighbors. Brennan Ray responded
that they have talked to the people in the area and was surprised that most of the
homes were owned by investors.
Zach Burns asked where the art will go. Brennan Ray responded that they propose to
have gallery windows along 3rd Street to display the art.
Dana Johnson asked if the art space would be air conditioned. Brennan Ray
commented that that is a great suggestion.
Vice Chair Pearl Starks asked if they had studied the traffic pattern in the area when it
is school dismissal time. Brennan Ray replied that he will provide more information on
that when the item returns for recommendation.
Sean Sweat asked about the parking ratio, and if it was possible to reduce parking with
the sustainability bonus provisions as most apartments build too much parking. Thomas
Hoy with Leon Capital responded that they will have one space per bed with some
guest parking to avoid people from parking in the neighborhood. Mr. Hoy added that
they have been talking to the school across the street about some of their staff using the
garage for parking.
Sean Sweat commented that he is concerned about spot zoning, likes using the
sustainability bonus provisions and that he would like the density designation to change
to include all the properties along 3rd Street.
Will Gaona asked if there would be any affordable housing units in this project, given
the presentation they heard earlier by Ms. Bouchee. Brennan Ray responded that they
are not considering including any affordable units.
Eva Olivas asked if the applicant were to consider adding affordable housing units, if
they would be beyond the normal set-aside timeframe. Brennan Ray answered that
they are trying to fill the gap of market rate units as presented on by Ms. Bouchee with
this project.
Public Comment:
Mitchell Willard with the Urban Phoenix Project asked if there was any way to achieve
the proposed height without changing the Zoning Ordinance. Brennan Ray stated that
the only mechanism to achieve what they need for the project is through a text
amendment.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 329
STAFF COMMENTS:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 330
Attachment D
Design Standards Committee Minutes
April 14, 2020
DESIGN STANDARDS COMMITTEE (DSC)
TEXT AMENDMENT Z-TA-7-19, TOWNSEND PARK
MINUTES
Monday, April 14, 2020 Meeting
Per the most recent guidelines from the federal government, the Design
Standards Committee held a meeting electronically, via a video conferencing
platform.
DSC MEMBERS DSC MEMBERS STAFF PRESENT
PRESENT ABSENT
Ben Patton, Chair Allan Gutkin Planning and Development
Department
Matt Seaman, Vice- Joshua Bednarek, Deputy
chair Director, Planning
Craig Steblay Christopher DePerro, Team
Leader, Site Plan
Dennis Newcombe Samantha Keating, Principal
Planner
Sarah Stockham, Central City
VPC planner
Vania Fletcher, DSC Liaison
1. Call to Order, introductions, and announcements.
The meeting was called to order by Chair Ben Patton at 2:24 pm, with a quorum
of four members. Introductions were made.
2. Remote Meeting Procedures and Staff Announcements.
Ms. Fletcher provided information regarding the remote meeting procedures, and
informed the Committee that Mr. Allan Guktin had to recuse himself due to a
conflict of interest. She read out the roles and duties of the Design Standards
Committee under Zoning Ordinance Section 308.
3. Review, discussion, and possible recommendation on the proposed draft of
the Text Amendment Z-TA-7-19 – Townsend Park.
Page 331
Design Standards Committee Minutes
April 14, 2020
The Chair called on Ms. Stockham to present. Ms. Stockham proceeded with a
PowerPoint presentation that was provided to the Committee as part of staff
documentation. She explained that the text amendment had three parts: to
amend the regulatory density map, to amend the regulatory buffer alley map, and
to amend the Townsend Park Character Area text for height.
Ms. Stockham described the details of each of the requests, starting with the
Density Map and the changes requested for a particular property to increase the
density from 43.5 dwelling units per acre to 125 dwelling units per acre by right.
Increase in Density: Ms. Stockham stated that staff found the proposal for density
to be consistent with the transitional nature of the Townsend Park Character Area,
the density designation to the west of the site, transit-oriented development
policies and goals
Buffer Alleys
Ms. Stockham clarified that the intent of the buffer alleys was to protect low
intensity residential neighborhoods – they alleys were not being removed, only
the designation and that there were no single-family residences along the alleys
in the proposal. Staff found that the proposal is consistent with existing uses and
character of the area.
Page 332
Design Standards Committee Minutes
April 14, 2020
Height Bonus in the Townsend Park Character Area
The final request, she explained, was to allow 30 percent Height Bonus for the
entire character area. Staff found the proposal is consistent with the Major Urban
Center TOD Strategic Policy Framework place type, the Downtown Phoenix Plan
policies, and that the proposal maintains the existing height transition in the
Character Area and provides for an increased level of community benefits.
Ms. Stockham explained that she reviewed the original intent of the Downtown
Code and that of the Downtown Phoenix Plan, the vision for the Townsend Park
Character Area and the original intent to have a height and strategies to protect
the East Evergreen Historic District east of 3rd Street. The Downtown Code
adopted a transitional district west of 3rd Street as mixed uses were permitted,
and Ms. Stockham explained that Townsend Park now has a very diverse number
of businesses. She informed the committee that additional studies have been
done post Downtown Code, such as Reinvent Phoenix and the 2013 TOD
Strategic Policy Framework which defined place types for areas within the quarter
mile from light rail stations. The TOD place type for this particular request falls
under the major urban center. She stated that staff finds that this is consistent
with the policies for McDowell.
Ms. Stockham stated that staff’s recommendation is for approval of the three
text amendment requests and that the Central City Village Planning Committee
heard this request for information only on March 9 and will hear the request for
recommendatio on May 11.
Chair Patton noted while the text amendment did approve a specific plan, this
came in because of a proposal for a specific developer plan. He had concern over
amending the regulatory maps and that it could mean to be ‘in hot water with the
Page 333
Design Standards Committee Minutes
April 14, 2020
neighborhood’ without a plan of a development. The chair stated also that this
could be a precedent.
Mr. Seaman noted his concern over the proposal to increase the density from
43.5 to 125 dwelling units per acre. He explained to staff that Townsend Park
already permits an increase of density with Bonus Points for a maximum 100%
increase, potentially allowing for 87 dwelling units per acre. Which meant that
‘theoretically’ speaking, by approving 125 units, the developer could potentially
increase the height up to 250 dwelling units per acre. He proposed that the
density should only be increase to 67.5 dwelling units per acre, once bonus points
were added, the total increase would come to the same 125.
Ms. Stockham stated that an increase in density would have to come with
‘cultural’ amenities to be approved and that 125 was the density on all properties
on the west side of 3rd Street. He asked if outreach had been done to the
community. The applicant stated that they had not done community outreach and
also stated that there was no intent to go above the 125 dwellings per unit.
Mr. Newcombe also commented on concerns over the lack of plans
[development] and the outreach and asked staff if the Village Planning Committee
(VPC) had anything to say. Ms. Stockham explained that the applicant made a
presentation and VPC had a discussion, stating that they would prefer affordable
housing. Mr. Newcombe stated that he was not as concerned about the increase
in height.
Mr. Seaman stated that he was very reluctant regarding amending regulating
plans, because that is exactly what was being proposed, and while the DTC may
not be have been adapting to changes in intensity, a lot more information was
needed for review for this precedent, especially since this was being done as an
owner request. He stated that maybe it was time to review the changes [in the
DTC] to see why this one site is more deserving than other areas which that could
go through a similar path.
Mr. DePerro explained that the density change was specific to this site only and
not to the whole of Townsend Park and that because of the DTC rezoning was not
the recourse, only the change in the regulatory plans.
Chair Patton reiterated that while the buffer alley and density only applied to the
developer parcel, the height increase applied to all of Townsend Park, and Mr.
Seaman asked for verification regarding the height. Ms. Keating showed the
proposed language showing the language change that would apply to all:
Page 334
Design Standards Committee Minutes
April 14, 2020
The Chair stated that the density request was an issue, it was a precedent, and
this could come up again. He noted that a slightly more intense density than 67.5
would be acceptable, and he asked the committee for comments. Mr. Steblay
stated that there was a precedent for 89 dwelling units per acre.
Mr. Newcombe noted that changes have occurred overtime in Downtown and that
the Character Area may be different in the future but was in agreement with the
density concerns. He also noted that the 89 dwelling units per acre had a lot of
history on it. He wanted assurances that any increase would require separate
sustainability bonus points. Mr. DePerro explained that you can’t use the same
bonus points for different requests, bonus points for height have to be different
than those for the density, that you can’t ‘double dip’.
The committee looked at the Density Map to identify existing densities. The
standard densities above 43.5 were 97 and 140. The committee felt that both
were too high and that 97 was also due to a previous entitlement increase. Mr.
Seaman reminded members that in order for a developer to double the density,
they would have to achieve all bonus points to be approved, but that 89 dwelling
units per acre could be the target number.
The Chair offered a motion: To approve all three requests with the exception of
the request for density, to be adjusted from 125 to 89 dwelling units per acre. Mr.
Seaman seconded.
Discussion: Mr. Steblay directed comments to staff by saying that changing an
entire area and spot zoning to allow extra entitlement feels like circumventing the
system and this could lead to others trying to pull the same thing. He asked staff
to evaluate maps and heights, it did not feel good to give special treatment for an
individual. Ms. Stockham and Ms. Keating addressed the concerns by stating that
the evaluation also included other policies for guidance such as Reinvent Phoenix
and place types.
Mr. Newcomb stated that in the future he would like to see the development plans
to see where the ‘rubbing’ points were. The Chair stated that this case, as a
model, felt like spot zoning.
Mr. Steblay, stated that for the record, he didn’t like the way this was going, that
they should look at a bigger picture. Mr. DePerro stated that as a city process, if
someone wants to file a request, they can do it.
Page 335
Design Standards Committee Minutes
April 14, 2020
The motion to approve all three requests with the exception of the request for
density to be adjusted from 125 to 89 dwelling units per acre was approved 4-0.
4. Committee Members announcements.
None.
5. Public comments concerning items not on the agenda. Not for discussion
or action.
None
6. Identification of additional meeting dates and future agenda items.
None identified
7. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 3:51 pm.
For further information on this item please call Vania Fletcher, Planning & Development
Department at 602-261-8664. You may also visit our website for this and other public
meeting notices and agendas: https://phoenix.gov/cityclerk/publicmeetings/notices.
Page 336
Attachment E
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-TA-7-19-8
Date of VPC Meeting July 12, 2021
Amend Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance to replace the Downtown Code
maps to amend density provisions and buffer alleys in
an area generally bounded by 3rd Street to 5th Street,
Request
and Willetta Street to McDowell Road and amend
Section 1220 (Townsend Park) to allow for a height
bonus at approximately 160 feet south of the southeast
corner of 3rd Street and McDowell Road.
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 10-1
VPC DISCUSSION:
Committee members Chris Colyer and Wayne Rainey left during this item, bringing
quorum to 11.
Sarah Stockham, staff, provided an overview of the three components of the text
amendment request, reviewed the surrounding land uses and the proposed project.
Zach Burns asked why this request is a text amendment and not a variance. Ms.
Stockham replied that the Downtown Code provides height and density limits in the
form of the map and any request to amend the maps and/or the character area text is a
text amendment.
Chair Rachel Frazier Johnson asked if staff or the applicant decides if their request
constitutes a text amendment. Ms. Stockham replied that any request to change the
text of the character area or update the maps is a text amendment.
Ryan Boyd asked if a future text amendment to the Downtown Code will impact this
site. Ms. Stockham replied that she is not familiar with the specifics of any future text
amendment and given that this request is site specific, it is doubtful that a larger text
amendment would impact this site.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 337
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-TA-7-19-8
Page 2
Brennan Ray, representing the applicant with Burch & Cracchiolo, introduced himself
and the proposed 7-story, 85-foot tall project with 288 units with an overall density of
109 dwelling units per acre. Mr. Ray added that the alley would remain intact but the
applicant will be proposing to abandon it and replace it with a public access easement,
and the height bonus proposed would require the project to incorporate more amenities
and enhance the building, and reviewed trip generation for the site.
Ryan Boyd asked if the applicant was planning on planting palm trees as shown in the
rendering, why the applicant is not pursing a revocable permit for the alley instead of
abandoning it, and why they are pursing this request which appears to be spot zoning
rather than a larger overhaul for the character area.
Brennan Ray replied that the palm trees are part of the rendering, the site will be
planted with trees appropriate for the area, the alley is different right-of-way than 2nd
Street with the pedestrian bridge so they were directed to go the alley abandonment
route, they are proposing to abandon the alley for their site only and record public
access and utility easements, and changes to the Downtown Code maps are done
through the text amendment process and density provisions perhaps should have been
the same for the entire Townsend Park Character Area.
Eva Olivas asked how the request is site specific but will also impact the character
area and asked for clarification on the Design Standards Committee’s
recommendation. Brennan Ray replied that the updates to the density and buffer alley
maps are site specific and the request for a height bonus allows for sites within the
character area to increase the allowable height by using bonus points. Sarah
Stockham, staff, added that the Design Standards Committee recommended approval
of the request with a modification that the allowable density be 89 dwelling units per
acre to provide more of a transition and since the character area allows a 100 percent
increase in density using bonus points the applicant could still achieve their allowable
density with points.
Brennan Ray added that they hosted their neighborhood meeting and one neighbor
attended and was supportive, and they have spoken with Mitchell Willard with the
Urban Phoenix Project regarding the abandonment.
Motion:
Darlene Martinez motioned to recommend approval of Z-TA-7-19-8. Patrick Panetta
seconded the motion.
Discussion:
Ryan Boyd shared that he was torn on the request but will be voting yes, and
continued that he has a concern with the alley abandonment and the issue of spot-
zoning, and that he is tired of requests to update the maps which seems to favor those
who get to ask for them.
Eva Olivas agreed with Mr. Boyd’s comments.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 338
Central City Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-TA-7-19-8
Page 3
Vice Chair Nate Sonoskey shared that while the alley abandonment is contentious, it
is difficult to get financing with the alley in place or with a revocable permit, and the
abandonment is more practical.
Vote:
10-1, motion to recommend approval passed with Committee Members Boyd,
Gonzalez, Johnson, Lockhart, Martinez, Olivas, Panetta, Starks, Sonoskey and R.
Johnson in favor and Committee Member Burns opposed.
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:
None.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 339
Attachment F
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
August 5, 2021
ITEM NO: 7
DISTRICT NO.: 8
SUBJECT:
Application #: Z-TA-7-19-8
Location: Approximately 160 feet south of the southeast corner of 3rd Street and
McDowell Road
Acreage: 2.10
Proposal: Amend Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
to replace the Downtown Code maps to amend density provisions and
buffer alleys in an area generally bounded by 3rd Street to 5th Street, and
Willetta Street to McDowell Road and amend Section 1220 (Townsend
Park) to allow for a height bonus.
Applicant: Brennan Ray, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Owner: JAG Development, et al.
Representative: Brennan Ray, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
ACTIONS:
Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text In Exhibit A of the Staff
Report.
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Central City 7/12/2021 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 10-1.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Central City Village Planning
Committee recommendation.
Motion Discussion: N/A
Motion details: Commissioner Howard made a MOTION to approve Z-TA-7-19-8, per the
Central City Village Planning Committee recommendation.
Maker: Howard
Second: Johnson
Vote: 7-0
Absent: Gorraiz and Magnum
Opposition Present: No
Findings:
The proposal maintains the transitional nature of the Townsend Park Character Area, situated
between the Downtown Gateway, McDowell Corridor and East Evergreen Character Areas.
Additional density and option for more height is warranted given the proposed development’s
proximity to the McDowell Road and Central Avenue light rail station. The proposal is in line with
the adopted Major Urban Center place type of the TOD Strategic Policy Framework and the
policies of the Downtown Phoenix Plan. The sustainability bonus option maintains the existing
height transition in the Townsend Park Character Area and offers community benefits in
Page 340
exchange for the option for additional height. The buffer alley removal is consistent with the
existing uses and character of the area.
Proposed Language:
Amend Chapter 12, Section 1202 (Regulating Maps) by removing the old maps, and inserting
new maps as follows:
***
Page 341
D. The density for any parcel in the Downtown Area shall not exceed the following unless a
density bonus is allowed by the Character Area and approved by the Planning and
Development Department staff or an appeal is approved by the Design Review Committee
(DRC) pursuant to Section 1223 requirements:
Page 342
***
Page 343
F. This map designates Buffer Alleys for which abutting properties must conform to the
standards and guidelines outlined in Sections 1207.O and P:
Page 344
***
Amend Chapter 12, Section 1220 (Townsend Park) to read as follows:
Page 345
***
B. Development Standards
1. Maximum Height
a. Main building: Governed by the height map, Section 1202.C.
(1) Height bonus: None. MAXIMUM 30% INCREASE.
This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Angie
Holdsworth at (602) 495-5622, TTY use 7-1-1.
Page 346
Attachment G
From: Gary Bushkin
To: Sarah Stockham
Cc: Gary Bushkin; Gary Bushkin; Alan Werner
Subject: Case No Z-TA-7-19
Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 10:12:12 AM
Ms. Stockham,
I represent Bombastic Properties who is the owner of 319 E McDowell Rd, Phoenix, AZ
I have also run our family business out of this building since 1997.
Please be advised that the proposal by LG Acquisitions to change the proposed Buffer Alley is
unacceptable. We run an active warehouse at 319 E McDowell Road via the alley directly
south of our building. We receive deliveries from large Semi-Trucks as well as ship thousands
of books from our warehouse weekly. We not only can not have any changes to the alley, we
are very concerned about any disruption during construction.
In addition, We do not feel changing the set backs on the project in any way is a good idea.
The height of the building proposed certainly deserves the required city set back area for
buffer.
Thank you,
Gary Bushkin
Page 347
Attachment H
Page 348
From: Ricki Horowitz
To: Sarah Stockham
Cc: Brennan Ray
Subject: Z-TA-7-19 The Townsend project: Support
Date: Thursday, June 17, 2021 8:08:25 AM
Sarah –
Please add to your file the support email below from one of our neighbors. Thanks. Ricki
From: Brian Tassinari
Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 11:56 AM
To: Jacque Collard
Subject: The Townsend project
I just saw the notice for a neighborhood meeting on this project. As you can see from my address below, our office is just east of the proposed development. Please enter into the record th
Allow sender
Warning! This message was sent from outside your organization [nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]
and we are unable to verify the sender. | Block sender
[nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]
sophospsmartbannerend
I just saw the notice for a neighborhood meeting on this project. As you can see from my address
below, our office is just east of the proposed development. Please enter into the record that we
support the zoning changes needed to build this project.
Best,
Brian
Brian Tassinari
Partner
516 E. Willetta Street | Phoenix, AZ 85004
602.903.6811 Main | 602.363.2627 Cell
brian@willettapartners.com [nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com] | willettapartners.com
Page 349
Supporting documents
No supporting documents stored.
View on Agenda Online ↗
69 item(s)