Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.





ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: October 15, 2025
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Civil Service Board

I recommend the following for appointment:

Robbin Coulon
Ms. Coulon is the Director of Legal Services at the Area Agency on Aging and a
resident of District 8. She replaces Elisa de la Vara for a partial term to expire February
21, 2027.

Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix

I recommend the following for reappointment:

Mark Moeremans
Mr. Moeremans will serve his second term to expire October 15, 2031.

Tina Marie Tentori
Ms. Tentori will serve her second term to expire October 15, 2031.

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee

Councilwoman Debra Stark recommends the following for appointment:

Kate Bauer
Ms. Bauer is the Co-Founder of the Arizona Neighborhood Alliance and a resident of
District 3. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire October 15, 2027.

Parks and Recreation Board

I recommend the following for appointment:




Leon Thomas
Mr. Thomas is a Resource Advisor at the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and a
resident of District 3. He replaces Ed Zuercher for a partial term to expire July 1, 2027.

Phoenix Deferred Compensation Board/Post Employment Healthcare Plan Board

City Manager Jeff Barton and I recommend the following for appointment:

David Matthews
Deputy City Manager David Matthews will replace Inger Erickson as Chair for a term to
expire October 15, 2028.

Jason Perkiser
Interim Human Resources Director Jason Perkiser will replace David Matthews as the
Human Resources Department representative for a term to expire October 15, 2028.







Report

Liquor License - Padre Murphys - District 1

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 357756.

Summary

Applicant
Nicholas Rosso, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4338 W. Bell Road, Ste. 1-4
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location is currently
licensed for liquor sales with a Series 12 - Restaurant, liquor license under a different
ownership and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 25, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
The applicant submitted an extensive statement. A copy is available upon request to
the City Clerk's Office at 200 West Washington Street, 1st Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85003.

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
The applicant submitted an extensive statement. A copy is available upon request to
the City Clerk's Office at 200 West Washington Street, 1st Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85003.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Padre Murphys - Data
Attachment B - Padre Murphys - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: PADRE MURPHYS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 4 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 2 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 3 1

Restaurant 12 5 2


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 52.28 95.22

Violent Crimes 12.31 7.08 15.28

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 53

Total Violations 68 96




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1042251 1988 402 1 142

1042253 805 272 12 65

1042261 1407 66 27 572

6181001 1908 536 20 61

6181003 1005 391 10 29

6183001 1257 408 5 80

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: PADRE MURPHY'S
4338 W BELL RD




Date: 9/2/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Jackson's #804 - District 2

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 355606.

Summary

Applicant
Ryan Turnock, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
21001 N. Tatum Boulevard, Ste. 84
Zoning Classification: C-2 DRSP
Council District: 2

This request is for a new liquor license for a liquor store. This location is currently
licensed for liquor sales with a Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store liquor license and
does not have an interim permit. This location requires a Use Permit to allow package
liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 19, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona



This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Jacksons has been in business since 1975 and currently holds 230+ branded stores
with liquor licenses in 6 western states. Jacksons is knowledgeable in operating liquor
stores and will have the employees trained in Arizona liquor laws to ensure
compliance.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Jacksons stores are a one stop shop. This is a busy location where neighbors can get
their cars washed as well as buying common items they may need. Jacksons is also
very involved in their local communities. From Boys and Girls Clubs to schools and
local sports.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application, noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Jackson's #804 - Data
Attachment B - Jackson's #804 - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: JACKSON'S #804
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 13 6

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 1

Liquor Store 9 3 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 3

Hotel 11 1 1

Restaurant 12 30 18


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 54 139.38

Violent Crimes 12.31 2.99 6.79
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 0

Total Violations 69 0




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6150021 488 100 5 14

6150023 1947 397 143 101

6151001 1413 407 25 11

6152012 6102 515 722 1020

6152022 84 50 30 0

6152023 3418 1016 778 112

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: JACKSON'S #804
21001 N TATUM BLVD




Date: 8/21/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Asian Chamber of Commerce Incorporated -
District 4

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Ryan Winkle

Location
5625 N. 17th Avenue
Council District: 4

Function
Cultural Celebration

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
November 28, 2025 - 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 1,000 attendees
November 29, 2025 - 3 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 2,000 attendees
November 30, 2025 - 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. / 2,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Brophy College Preparatory - District 4

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Julie Peterson

Location
4701 N. Central Avenue
Council District: 4

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
November 8, 2025 - 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. / 600 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Arizona Educational Foundation, Inc. - District 6

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Matthew Gerber

Location
5601 N. 16th Street
Council District: 6

Function
Reception

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 25, 2025 - 4 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 904 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Six Byrd Cider - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 357677.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 7 - Beer and Wine Bar

Location
3619 E. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6

This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a beer and
wine bar. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales with a Series 19 - Remote
Tasting Room liquor license and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 20, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the



State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Six Byrd Cider (Series 13)
941 S. Park Lane, Ste. 105, Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: In April 2024, a fine of $250 was paid for failure to report
annual production at the end of the calendar year.

Six Byrd Cider (Series 13)
1920 E. University Drive, Ste. 101, Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Six Byrd Cider (Series 19)
3619 E. Indian School Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 1
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owners currently own and operate other licenses in the Valley. They will continue
to abide by Arizona Title 4 liquor laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Six Byrd Cider is dedicated to crafting and serving exceptional, locally produced
ciders, paired with a seasonal menu in a wecloming taproom. With a series 7 license,
we'll expand our offerings to include a variety of Arizona's best craft beers and wines,
promoting local producers, enhancing community engagement, and elevating the
guest experience. This will strengthen Arizona's craft beverage culture making Six
Byrd a hub for Arizona craft beverage community.”



Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Six Byrd Cider - Data
Attachment B - Six Byrd Cider - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: SIX BYRD CIDER
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 2 0

Bar 6 7 4

Beer and Wine Bar 7 8 1

Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 10 2

Restaurant 12 37 16


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 181.1 114.86

Violent Crimes 12.31 20.85 10.5
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 44

Total Violations 68 64




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1082003 1237 375 35 61

1083021 1269 360 68 58

1083022 1419 351 90 116

1109011 1092 393 51 29

1109012 2651 403 151 482

1109021 2051 122 184 126

1109022 2584 472 149 528

1110001 1097 117 20 93

1110002 891 325 25 43

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: SIX BYRD CIDER
3619 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD




Date: 9/2/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Phoenix Law Enforcement Association Charities
- District 7

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Darrell Kriplean

Location
1102 W. Adams Street
Council District: 7

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 30, 2025 - 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 75 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Tres Cabo Amigos LLC - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 356965.

Summary

Applicant
Richard Austin, Agent

License Type
Series 4 - Wholesaler

Location
625 S. 27th Avenue, Ste. 130B
Zoning Classification: A-2
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a wholesaler. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 21, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Tres Cabo Amigos LLC (Series 4)
1726 E. Deer Valley Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 0



Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have an MBA from Thunderbird-American Graduate of Int'l Business. I have a PhD in
Tequila Studies. I have been doing this since getting our AZ LLC in October 2020 and
having sold our 1st bottls in December 2022. We had an AZ liquor license but have to
move warehouses as the place was sold. I have went through background check. I
have lived in AZ, Maricopa County since 1991.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application, noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - El Corral Sports Bar - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 357825.

Summary

Applicant
Christian Kramber, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
5820 W. McDowell Road, Ste. 112
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a bar. This location is currently licensed for
liquor sales with a Series 12 - Restaurant liquor license and does not have an interim
permit. This business has plans to open in December 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 20, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“1. Controlling Person and both managers submitted with application will clear
background with no issues. 2. Both Managers filed will have approved State Title IV
required training. 3. One of the managers is currently a controlling person in a different
AZ liquor License currently issued.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"As we are applying for a Series 6 liquor license our clientele will be focused on
individuals over the legal drinking age. We want to be able to offer our patrons the
opportunity to enjoy an alcoholic beverage wether they simply walk in or are there to
enjoy watching Their favorite game or sports on television."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - El Corral Sports Bar - Data
Attachment B - El Corral Sports Bar - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: EL CORRAL SPORTS BAR
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 4 0

Bar 6 2 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 5 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 5

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 3 2


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 159.84 228.23

Violent Crimes 12.31 40.89 49.78
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 107

Total Violations 69 173




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1124012 2473 407 16 352

1124021 2810 555 14 1178

1124022 1235 173 5 24

1124023 1756 282 10 414

1125022 1213 281 5 364

1125023 1131 281 4 119

1125041 2005 367 19 284

1125071 1525 95 19 253

1125072 1429 0 55 491

1125122 310 0 333 236

1125211 2161 0 57 199

1125221 3399 358 7 243

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: EL CORRAL SPORTS BAR
5820 W MCDOWELL RD




Date: 8/22/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Huss Brewpub - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 357459.

Summary

Applicant
Camila Alarcon, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant with Growler Privileges

Location
225 E. Monroe Street
Zoning Classification: DTC - Business Core
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 25, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant's members have significant experience operating establishments with liquor
licenses. Applicant's members currently hold liquor licenses in Tempe, Chandler,
Phoenix, and Scottsdale. Applicant will continue to follow all Arizona liquor laws and
regulations, and will ensure proper training of managers and staff.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Applicant will continue operating this location with a Series 12 liquor license, which
has met the criteria of public convenience and best interest of the community."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application, noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Huss Brewpub - Data
Attachment B - Huss Brewpub - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: HUSS BREWPUB
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 1

Microbrewery 3 3 1

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 7 4

Bar 6 50 36

Beer and Wine Bar 7 11 6

Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 15 3

Hotel 11 7 7

Restaurant 12 101 53

Club 14 2 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 239.49 370.59

Violent Crimes 12.31 59.26 78.13

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 22

Total Violations 68 42




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1131001 1929 146 155 743

1131002 2026 50 492 845

1131003 2654 2 355 297

1132022 1347 118 99 594

1140003 1025 304 49 114

1140004 394 12 24 88

1141001 2605 227 111 276

1142001 938 210 81 167

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: HUSS BREWPUB
225 E MONROE ST




Date: 9/2/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Oro De Sonora - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 357233.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 18 - Craft Distiller

Location
910 W. Jackson Street, Ste. 17
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a distillery. This location was not previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 20, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We have taken Title IV and Management Liquor License courses, and are committed
to operating within local, state, and federal guidelines.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We will responsibly operate our business, and abide by all federal, state, and local
laws. We hope to grow our small distillery, and provide quality jobs to the local
economy.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application, noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Oro de Sonora - Data
Attachment B - Oro de Sonora - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: ORO DE SONORA
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 0

Microbrewery 3 2 0

Government 5 3 0

Bar 6 35 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 5 0

Liquor Store 9 5 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 15 1

Hotel 11 5 0

Restaurant 12 55 2

Club 14 3 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 235.45 179.29

Violent Crimes 12.31 80.86 109.97
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 29

Total Violations 68 66




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1129002 671 102 83 94

1129003 1168 99 40 80

1131001 1929 146 155 743

1141001 2605 227 111 276

1142001 938 210 81 167

1143011 911 80 49 374

1143021 1376 93 37 279

1143022 1217 30 68 366

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: ORO DE SONORA
910 W JACKSON ST




Date: 9/2/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Tipsy Scoop - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 357090.

Summary

Applicant
Tamika Wooten, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
355 N. Central Avenue, Ste. 102
Zoning Classification: DTC - Business Core
Council District: 7

This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a bar. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 17, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“As a judge and attorney in the Valley. I am committed to upholding the highest
standards to maintain compliance with applicable laws. Managers & staff are or will be
trained in the techniques of recognizing signs and symptoms of impairment.
Additionally, each employee will be required to card all customers who are attempting
to purchase alcohol infused treats or beverages with alcohol.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Tipsy Scoop solves the downtown dilemma that people over 21 face after attending a
concert or sporting event, when they are not quite ready to end the night, but are
looking for something to do besides sitting in a smoky bar! Likewise, parents with
children, don't have to take their kids home after a game, concert or symphony, they
can continue the night by getting a non-alcohol infused ice cream treat.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application, noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Tipsy Scoop - Data
Attachment B - Tipsy Scoop - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: TIPSY SCOOP
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 0

Microbrewery 3 4 1

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 7 4

Bar 6 51 37

Beer and Wine Bar 7 13 8

Liquor Store 9 5 4

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 4

Hotel 11 7 6

Restaurant 12 105 60

Club 14 2 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 267.35 428.66

Violent Crimes 12.31 70.22 88.74

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 34

Total Violations 69 64




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1130001 2898 331 199 515

1131001 1929 146 155 743

1131002 2026 50 492 845

1131003 2654 2 355 297

1132022 1347 118 99 594

1140003 1025 304 49 114

1141001 2605 227 111 276

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: TIPSY SCOOP
355 N CENTRAL AVE




Date: 9/3/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Alwun House Foundation (October 31, 2025) -
District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Dana Johnson

Location
1204 E. Roosevelt Street
Council District: 8

Function
Art Exhibit

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 31, 2025 - 7 p.m. to 12:30 a.m. / 300 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Alwun House Foundation (December 5, 2025) -
District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Dana Johnson

Location
1209 E. Diamond Street
Council District: 8

Function
Art Market

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
December 5, 2025 - 6 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. / 300 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Alwun House Foundation (February 6, 2026) -
District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Dana Johnson

Location
1209 E. Diamond Street
Council District: 8

Function
Art Market

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
February 6, 2026 - 6 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. / 300 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Alwun House Foundation (February 14, 2026) -
District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Dana Johnson

Location
1204 E. Roosevelt Street
Council District: 8

Function
Art Show

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
February 14, 2026 - 6 p.m. to 12:30 a.m. / 450 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Alwun House Foundation (February 20, 2026) -
District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Dana Johnson

Location
1204 E. Roosevelt Street
Council District: 8

Function
Poetry and Music Event

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
February 20, 2026 - 7 p.m. to 12:30 a.m. / 250 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Hawker Foundation - District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Cindy Louie

Location
113 N. 6th Street
Council District: 8

Function
Cultural Event

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
December 13, 2025 - 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 1,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Special Event - Hospitality United - District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Wallon Walusayi

Location
435 S. 3rd Avenue
Council District: 8

Function
Community Event

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 31, 2025 - 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 400 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Liquor License - Tacos Los Vales - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 349162.

Summary

Applicant
Paloma Alvarez, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
310 S. 4th Street, Ste. 120
Zoning Classification: PUD
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is November 2, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations



on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Cayomango (Series 12)
4333 W. Indian School Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 35
Liquor license violations: None

Tacos Los Vales (Series 12)
5124 W. McDowell Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 7
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I already have another location of Tacos Los Vales with liquor license, and I have
shown that I can handle it responsibly. My team and I know the rules and we are
trained, experienced and we make sure everything is done right, from checking ID's to
keeping a safe and respectful environment for out customers.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Tacos Los Vales is a well-loved spot where families, friends, and locals gather to
enjoy good food and a great atmosphere. Being able to offer alcoholic beverages
responsibly adds to the experience our customers are looking for. We're committed to
creating a safe welcoming space for everyone. This license will help us better meet our
customers' needs and continue contributing positively to the community.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Tacos Los Vales - Data


Attachment B - Tacos Los Vales - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: TACOS LOS VALES
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 1

Microbrewery 3 3 0

Wholesaler 4 1 1

Government 5 4 2

Bar 6 47 23

Beer and Wine Bar 7 10 3

Liquor Store 9 6 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 15 2

Hotel 11 7 4

Restaurant 12 85 43

Club 14 3 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 211.67 218.36

Violent Crimes 12.31 51.77 41.4

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 17

Total Violations 69 22




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1131003 2654 2 355 297

1132022 1347 118 99 594

1140002 0 0 18 0

1140003 1025 304 49 114

1140004 394 12 24 88

1141001 2605 227 111 276

1142001 938 210 81 167

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: TACOS LOS VALES
310 S 4TH ST




Date: 9/3/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Liquor License - Vesper - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 357863.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
821 N. 3rd Street, Ste. 12
Zoning Classification: DTC - Evans Churchill West
Council District: 8

This request is for a location transfer of a liquor license for a bar. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow a bar.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 25, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications, and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the



State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Seamus McCaffrey's Irish Pub & Restaurant (Series 6)
18 W. Monroe Street, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 12
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar, and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability, and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Vesper would like to offer a variety of specialty craft cocktails in a high-end setting to
locals and out-of-state visitors. Applicant would like to offer alcoholic beverages to
guests 21 and over.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application, noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Vesper - Data
Attachment B - Vesper - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.

Liquor License Data: VESPER
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 0

Microbrewery 3 4 2

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 7 6

Bar 6 50 16

Beer and Wine Bar 7 15 7

Liquor Store 9 6 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 15 6

Hotel 11 7 2

Restaurant 12 107 42

Club 14 2 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 267.88 349.15

Violent Crimes 12.31 59.84 75.15

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 67

Total Violations 69 102




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1130001 2898 331 199 515

1130002 1364 179 221 139

1131001 1929 146 155 743

1131002 2026 50 492 845

1131003 2654 2 355 297

1132021 740 87 52 190

1132022 1347 118 99 594

1132041 1507 221 53 310

1132042 506 63 11 131

1140003 1025 304 49 114

1141001 2605 227 111 276

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: VESPER
821 N 3RD ST




Date: 9/3/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Off-Track Pari-Mutuel Wagering Permit - Connolly's Sports Grill - District 2

Request for an Off-track Pari-Mutuel Wagering Permit for a business that has a Series
6 liquor license.

Summary
State law requires City Council approval before a State Off-track Pari-Mutuel Wagering
Permit can be issued. This request is for a permit for off-track betting on horse races
conducted at Turf Paradise.

Applicant
David Johnson, Agent for Turf Paradise

Location
2605 W. Carefree Highway, Ste. 140
Zoning Classification: C-2 NBCCPOD
Council District: 2

Public Opinion
Public notice was posted at the proposed location and special notice letters were
mailed to residents within a 1/8 mile radius of the proposed location, if any. The
comment period expired October 3, 2025. No protest or support letters were received
within the 20-day public comment period.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Connolly's Sports Grill - Data
Attachment B - Connolly's Sports Grill - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.



Liquor License Data: CONNOLLY'S SPORTS GRILL
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 2 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 3 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 0

Restaurant 12 6 3



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 23.19 24.41

Violent Crimes 12.31 3.18 5.09

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 3

Total Violations 69 5



Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6106001 80 36 17 0

6106003 1922 528 27 133

6113004 1767 465 33 51

6113005 2501 532 70 0

6113006 749 205 9 0

Average 1601 393 60 177



Liquor License Map: CONNOLLY'S SPORTS GRILL
2605 W CAREFREE HWY




Date: 9/12/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Homer Farms Inc. and Lehr Innovations, LLC, a disregarded entity of Edmund
Carl Williams

For $39,000 in additional payment authority for Contracts 162186 and 162188 for the
Backyard Garden Program for the Office of Environmental Programs. These contracts
provide participating residents with a garden system and training that empowers them
to grow healthy food in their own backyards. The Backyard Garden Program has been
instrumental in expanding residents' access to healthy food, enhancing health,
promoting physical activity, and decreasing food insecurity. Additional funding is
necessary to increase the number of participating residents.








Report

Creative Machines

For $100,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about October 15,
2025, through December 30, 2027, for artist design services for the Office of Arts and
Culture. Public Art projects are typically part of a major infrastructure project in
partnership with the City's other departments, with Arts and Culture staff working side-
by-side with the client department's project timeline. The project timeline for the 3rd
Street Rio Salado to Lincoln Street Connector Project has been fast-tracked. Procuring
artist design services will allow the Office of Arts and Culture to meet the deadline
while holding to a professional standard due to the artist's intimate knowledge and
expertise related to this type of public art project.








Report

coLAB Studio

For $140,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about October 15,
2025, through December 31, 2027, for artist design services for the Office of Arts and
Culture. Public Art projects are mostly part of a major project that the City's
departments design and build. As a business practice, Arts and Culture staff works
alongside or side-by-side with the department's project timeline. The 7th Street Bridge
Public Art Project has a quick turnaround for its completion to keep up with the CAP
Water Education Center Project. Procuring artist design services will allow the Office of
Arts and Culture to meet the deadline while holding to a professional standard due to
the artist's intimate knowledge and expertise related to this type of public art project.








Report

Bags of Bags

For $180,604 in payment authority to purchase customized evidence bags through
June 30, 2026 for the Police Department. The Police Department uses evidence bags
to secure and maintain the integrity of all impounded items. The bags must have a
secured seal which ensures bag/evidence cannot be tampered with. Varying shapes
and sizes must maintain quality standards for a minimum of five years. These
evidence bags are purchased from Bags of Bags, who have manufactured bags
specific to the Police Department's requirements and specifications.








Report

National Calibration Inc.

For $16,000 in additional payment authority for Contract 157024 for the calibration of
equipment used by the Construction Materials Laboratory for the Street Transportation
Department. The purpose of the Amendment is for a repair to the Ignition Furnace
Oven equipment, and for an increase to the calibration prices due to a CPI increase of
9 percent since the contract's inception.








Report

City of Mesa

For $80,000 in payment authority for landscaping costs associated with the Val Vista
Water Treatment Plant for Fiscal Year 2025-26 for the Water Services Department. In
accordance with the operating agreement between cities, 59 percent is paid by the








Report

Settlement of Claims Theut v. City of Phoenix

To make payment of up to $1,200,000 in settlement of claim(s) in Theut v. City of
Phoenix, CV2021-013125, 19-0225-003, GL, BI, for the Finance Department pursuant
to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of a claim involving the Police
Department that occurred on March 13, 2019.








Report

Proposed Rancho Grande Annexation - Public Hearing - District 7

A public hearing, as required by Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-471, on the
proposed Rancho Grande Annexation. This public hearing allows the City Council to
gather community input regarding this annexation proposal. The City Council will not
act on the proposed annexation at this public hearing. Formal adoption of this
proposed annexation will be considered at a later date.

Summary
The annexation was requested by M. Brennan Ray with the Ray Law Firm for the
purpose of receiving City of Phoenix services. The proposed annexation conforms to
current City policies and complies with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-471
regarding annexations. Additionally, the annexation is recommended for adoption per
the attached Task Force Analysis Report (Attachment A).

Public Outreach
Notification of the public hearing was published in the Arizona Business Gazette
newspaper, and was posted in at least three conspicuous places in the area proposed
to be annexed. Also, notice via first-class mail was sent to each property owner within
the proposed annexation area.

Location
The proposed annexation area includes parcels 104-83-014, 104-83-015, 104-83-016,
and 104-83-017, located in the vicinity of 67th Avenue and Baseline Road (
Attachment B). The annexation area is approximately 18.75 acres (0.0293 sq. mi.)
and the population estimate is 8.1 individuals.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Attachment A


CITY COUNCIL REPORT

TO: Alan Stephenson
Deputy City Manager

FROM: Joshua Bednarek
Planning and Development Director

SUBJECT: Request for Task Force Analysis: Rancho Grande Annexation, No. 557

This report recommends the approval of the proposed annexation of approximately 18.72
acres located approximately 480 feet west of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and
Baseline Road (APNs 104-83-014, 104-83-015, 104-83-016,104-83-017).

THE REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting to annex approximately 18.72 acres, located approximately 480
feet west of the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Baseline Road from Maricopa County.
The applicant is requesting annexation with the intention of rezoning to R-3 to develop 216
multifamily residences including 148 detached units and 68 duplex units.
OTHER INFORMATION:
Planning Village: Laveen
General Plan Designation: Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
Current Zoning District: RU-43
Equivalent Zoning District: S-1

Current Land Use

Conditions on Site: Maricopa County jurisdiction, zoned RU-43, single-family
residential, farming, and automotive repair

To the North: City of Phoenix jurisdiction, zoned R1-8 and RE-35, single-
family residential

To the South: City of Phoenix jurisdiction, zoned R1-6 PCD and C-1 PCD,
single-family residential, gas station, and vacant land

To the West: Maricopa County jurisdiction, zoned RU-43, landscaping
storage

To the East: City of Phoenix jurisdiction, zoned C-2, single-family
residential


Maricopa County History of Non-Conformities Present? NONE PRESENT




Attachment A


Maricopa County Zoning Case History:

None

ALTERNATIVES:

• Option A - Annex the land as requested:

The City of Phoenix will control rezoning requests in this area to ensure conformance
with the General Plan Land Use Map. The City of Phoenix will capture property tax,
utility tax, state shared revenue, and impact fees.

• Option B - Deny the request for annexation:

If annexed later, this site would have been developed under County zoning and
development standards that may not be consistent with the General Plan, Land Use
Map, zoning, and development standards.

RECOMMENDATION:

Located adjacent to City of Phoenix lands, this annexation is supported by the 2025 General
Plan, particularly the Land Use goal for land uses and development standards for
unincorporated land, under Policies 1 and 2. This annexation is recommended for approval.
Approval of annexation does not constitute recommendation for future rezoning actions.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

I. Water and Sewer Service

4 - Parcels, APN 104-83-014, 015, 16, 017, 67th Avenue and Baseline Road
Q.S.#: 1-12
Water Pressure Zone Area: 0S
Acres: 18.75

Water:
6-inch ACP water main within Baseline Rd
12-inch DIP water main within Baseline Rd

Sewer:
30” DIP sewer main within Baseline Rd (no direct connections to main, must connect
through existing or new manhole)

Specifics regarding infrastructure improvement requirements would be discussed and
determined at a pre-application meeting after annexation. Additional information and
requirements provided under PAPP 2402903 for KIVA 24-759.

It is the City’s intent to provide water and sewer service. However, the requirements
and assurances for water and sewer service are determined during the site plan
application review, or the building permit approval, and may be subject to future



Attachment A


restrictions as a result of water shortage. Water and/or sewer system requirements and
stipulations are determined at time of site plan approval. Capacity on any existing
infrastructure is determined at that time of preliminary site plan approval. Please be
advised that capacity is a dynamic condition that can change over time due to a variety
of factors.

Per City Code 37-22, 37-39 and 37-142, annexation into the City requires all properties
connect to the City’s public water system. All existing on-site private wells must be
disconnected to prevent cross contamination with the City’s public water system.

Developments that use an average of 250,000-gallons of water or more per day are
required to provide a Water Conservation Plan. In addition, developments that use an
average of 500,000-gallons of water or more per day are required to demonstrate a
minimum of 30% water reuse in the Water Conservation Plan. The Water Conservation
Plan must be reviewed and approved by the Water Services Department (WSD) prior
to preliminary site plan approval.
II. Fire Protection

Servicing Station:
Laveen Fire Station #58
4718 West Dobbins Road
Laveen, Arizona 85339

Current Response Time: 5 Min. 36 Sec.
City Average Response Time: 5 Min.0 Sec.
Difference From Typical Response Time: 0 Min. -36 Sec.
Number Of Service Calls Expected: 87
Average Cost Per Service Call: $727
Estimated Total Annual Fire Service Costs: $63,147

III. Police Protection

Servicing Station:
Maryvale / Estrella Precinct
Estrella Mountain Substation
2111 South 99th Avenue
Tolleson, Arizona 85353
Number Of New Officers Required: 0.59
Number Of New Patrol Cars Required: 0.35
Estimated Total Annual Police Service Costs: $112,867

IV. Refuse Collection
Number of New Containers Required: 0
Cost for Refuse Containers, Each: $52.35
Cost for Recycling Containers, Each: $52.35
Total Start-Up Costs for Refuse Collection: $0
V. Street Maintenance




Attachment A



Average Cost Per Acre for Street
Maintenance: $172
Estimated Total Annual Street
Maintenance Costs: $3,214

VI. Public Transit

Servicing Routes: Route 77 – Baseline (East and West)

VII. Parks and Recreation

Neighborhood Park Demand in Acres: 2.21
Community Park Demand in Acres: 1.18
District Park Demand in Acres: 1.18
Total Park Demand in Acres: 4.57
Cost Per Acre, Annual Maintenance: $17,000
Total Annual Parks and Recreation Costs: $77,690

VIII. Schools

Elementary School District: Laveen Elementary School District
High School District: Phoenix Union High School District
Total Expected Elementary School Students: 151
Total Expected High School Students: 86
Total Expected New Students: 238

IX. Revenues

Development Impact Fees: Impact fees may include water and sewer fees which are
based on building area, specific commercial use(s), gross site area for the commercial
portion of the project, water meters, and number of drainage fixture units (DFUs).

Expected Total Impact Fees at Buildout: $1,569,073
Beginning Next Fiscal Year
Property Tax Income*: $1,032

Beginning Next
Utility Fee Income: $27,000
State Shared Revenue: $243,838

Fiscal Year
Solid Waste: $0
Sales Tax Generated: $0
Total Tax Related Income, Annually**: $271,870




Attachment A


Beginning 2025-2026 Fiscal Year
Property Tax Income*: $1,032

Beginning 2025-
Utility Fee Income: $27,000
State Shared Revenue: $243,838

2026 Fiscal Year
Solid Waste: $0
Sales Tax Generated: $0
Total Tax Related Income, Annually**: $271,870

X. Total Costs

Revenue, First Year Only: $1,840,943
Revenue, Year Two and Beyond: $271,870

Expenses, First Year Only: $256,919
Expenses, Year Two and Beyond: $256,919

XI. Total Annual Revenue

Total Annual Revenue, First Year**: $1,584,025
Total Annual Revenue, 2025
and Beyond**: $14,951

*The above referenced Property Tax Income figures are based on vacant parcels
only; it does not refer to future development which will vary depending on number of
lots and individual square footage

**Total Tax Related Income and Total Annual Revenues will vary depending on
project scope and size, the timing of permit issuance and build-out.




ATTACHMENT B




Legal Description
For
Lots 7-10
Rancho Grande Uno
Located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 1 East, Gila and Salt
River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona.

Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Rancho Grande Uno, according to the plat of record in the office of the
Maricopa County recorder, Arizona in Book 144 of Maps, Page 12. Being described as follows:

Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 36;

Thence North 90°00’00” West, along the South line of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of
1,323.87 feet;

Thence departing said South line, North 00°00’00” East, a distance of 55.00 feet to the Southwest
Quarter of said Lot 7 and the Point of Beginning;

Thence North 00°49'38" West, along the West line of said Lot 7, a distance of 967.25 feet to the
Northwest corner thereof;

Thence South 89°54'42" East, along the North line of said Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, a distance of
845.23 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 10;

Thence South 00°50'13" East, along the East line of said Lot 10, a distance of 965.95 feet to the
Southeast corner thereof;

Thence North 90°00’00” West, along the South line of said Lots 10, 9, 8 and 7, a distance of
845.37 feet to the Point of Beginning.

Containing 816,967.26 square feet or 18.75 acres, more or less.




LAVEEN FARMS - UNIT 2
BK. 769, PG. 9, M.C.R.
LOT 187 LOT 186 LOT 185 LOT 184 LOT 183 LOT 182 LOT 181

TRACT H TRACT H




N0° 50' 33"W(M) N0°48'46"W(R) 2637.36'(M) 2637.33'(R)
S89° 54' 42"E 845.23'




N0° 49' 38"W 967.25'
LOT 6 LOT 11




S0° 50' 13"E 965.95'
RANCHO GRANDE UNO
LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 RANCHO GRANDE UNO




67TH AVE.
BK. 144, PG. 12, M.C.R. BK. 144, PG. 12, M.C.R.




POINT OF BEGINNING
N0° 00' 00"E
55.00' N90° 00' 00"W 845.37'
1307.22' 1323.87'
N90° 00' 00"E 2631.09'(M) 2630.30'(R)
S 1/4 COR. SEC. 36 BASELINE ROAD
SE COR. SEC. 36
T 1 N., R 1 E. T 1 N., R 1 E.
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT



N e
re
d Land
F I CA T E
S
u




Plotted: 02/18/25 - 1:03 PM, By: mragsdale
TERRASCAPE
t TI N
s CE
R
O
rv
Re g i 48943
eyo
.

Mitchell H. r
Ragsdale .
Da
te
2/18/25. ..
Si . .
AR g ne d . .
N.T.S. I ZO .A
NA U . S




EXHIBIT
LOTS 7-10




File: M:\1726_NexMetro_67th and Baseline_Phoenix\Survey\1726_EXH_Lots 7-10.dwg, ---> EXH
BK. 144, PG. 12, M.C.R.
645 E. MISSOURI AVE., STE. 420 AVILLA MERIDIAN
PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85012 CITY OF PHOENIX
Project No. 1726 Date : 2/18/25
Sheet 1 of 1



Report

Proposed 64th Street and Camelback Road Right-of-Way Annexation (Ordinance
S-52328) - District 6

An ordinance extending and increasing the corporate limits of the City of Phoenix,
Arizona, pursuant to the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-471(O), by
annexing a certain tract of land contiguous to and not embraced within the present
limits of the City of Phoenix, contingent upon the approval by the Maricopa County
Board of Supervisors, designated as 64th Street and Camelback Road Right-of-Way
Annexation, No. 562.

Summary
This annexation process will be in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9
-471(O), which provides that the annexation of County right-of-way may be
accomplished by the mutual consent of the governing bodies of the County and City.
When the proposed annexation is approved by both bodies at public meetings, and
both actions become effective, the annexation is complete.

Location
This requested annexation of right-of-way is for the unincorporated right-of-way
running along the western side of 64th Street approximately 175 feet south of the
intersection at Camelback Road to approximately 135 feet north of the intersection at
Hillcrest Boulevard, as recommended by the City of Phoenix Street Transportation
Department. The area being annexed (Attachment A) is approximately 1.2913 acres
(0.002 square miles).
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Attachment A




Exhibit “A”
Project No. TT0011
64th Street at Camelback Road


LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TRANSFER OF RIGHT OF WAY

A parcel of land in the Northeast Quarter and the Southeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 2 North,
Range 4 East of the Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, and being more
particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING at the East Quarter corner of said Section 21, from which the Northeast corner of said
Section 17, bears North 00°12'08"East, for a distance of 2637.81 feet;


THENCE along the easterly line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21 South 00°05'39" West, for a
distance of 175.02 feet to the northerly line of Phoenix Ordinance G4337;
THENCE along said northerly line South 89°09'10" West, for a distance of 40.01 feet to the easterly line
of Phoenix Ordinance G405;
THENCE along said easterly line North 00°05'39" East, for a distance of 175.02 feet;
THENCE continuing along said easterly line North 00°12'07" East, for a distance of 1231.56 feet to the
southerly line of Phoenix Ordinance G1923;;
THENCE along said southerly line South 89°47'52" East, for a distance of 40.00 feet to a point on the
easterly line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21;
THENCE along said easterly line South 00°12'08" West, for a distance of 1230.82 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.

The above described parcel contains 56,248 square feet or 1.2913 acres, more or less, and is depicted on
attached Exhibit "B".




MARICOPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 03/12/2025
Prelim: 03/11/2025 AH Chk: Appr:
Rev:
Maricopa County Real Estate Department


03/12/2025







Report

(CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 17, 2025) - Early Intervention System Contract
- RFP 25-0629 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-52268) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into a
contract with Benchmark Solutions, LLC dba Benchmark Analytics, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Benchmark Buyer, Inc., to provide an Early Intervention System for the
Police Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $3,416,511.

Summary
This contract will provide an Early Intervention System, along with ongoing
maintenance and support. The Early Intervention System is a predictive and adaptable
system that identifies department employees, sworn and civilian, who display the
indicators of potentially problematic behaviors. It will provide vital support to the Police
Department to ensure the safety and security of each person in the community while
fostering employee excellence through data-driven wellness and training.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Two vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An evaluation
committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria with a
maximum possible point total of 1,000:
· Qualifications and Experience - 180 points
· Method of Approach - 560 points
· Price - 80 points
· Demonstration - 180 points

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:



Benchmark Solutions, LLC dba Benchmark Analytics, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Benchmark Buyer, Inc. - 662.92 points

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about September 17, 2025, for a three-year term with two
one-year options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $3,416,511. Funding is available in the
Police Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Salt River Project Construction License for City Project WS85500430 - 16-inch
Zone OS Main, Dobbins from 51st Avenue to 59th Avenue (Ordinance S-52316) -
Districts 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into a
construction license with Salt River Project (SRP) for work associated with City Project
WS85500430 - 16-inch Zone OS Main, Dobbins from 51st to 59th avenues. Further
request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to
authorize inclusion of provisions in the documents pertaining to this transaction for
indemnification and assumption of liability that otherwise should be prohibited by
Phoenix City Code 42-18.

Summary
The City is completing the installation of a new 16-inch diameter water transmission
main, and the purpose of this construction license is to allow for waterline installation
undercrossings and fire hydrant installation paralleling an SRP irrigation pipe.

Contract Term
The term of the construction license is one year, beginning on or about September 17,
2025.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City.

Location
Dobbins Road: 51st to 59th avenues.
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer and the Street Transportation and Water Services departments.








Report

Salt River Project Engineering Services Agreement - ST89340634 (Ordinance S-
52329) - Districts 4 & 5

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into
an Engineering Services Agreement with Salt River Project for the engineering of
irrigation facilities to be modified or relocated to accommodate certain improvement or
other development needs for City Project ST89340634 - 35th Avenue, Interstate 10 to
Camelback Road. Further request to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City
Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion of provisions in the documents pertaining to this
transaction for indemnification and assumption of liability that otherwise should be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. Further request authorization for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item in an amount not to exceed
$63,180.

Summary
The City is constructing vehicular and pedestrian improvements, traffic signal and
intersection modernization, raised medians, streetlighting, fiber installation, pavement
replacement, and other necessary work through the federal Better Utilizing
Investments to Leverage Development Grant Program. This Engineering Services
Agreement represents the cost for Salt River Project’s engineering of irrigation facilities
to be modified or relocated to accommodate certain improvement or other
development needs of the City’s project.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement will begin on or about October 15, 2025 and will expire
when the project is completed and accepted.

Financial Impact
The agreement will not exceed $63,180. Funding is available in the Street
Transportation Department's Capital Improvement Program Budget.

Location
35th Avenue from Interstate 10 to Camelback Road.
Council Districts: 4 and 5




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Street
Transportation Department.








Report

Growth Projections and Land Use Assumptions Update - Amendment
(Ordinance S-52298) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to execute an
amendment to Contract 156366 with Applied Economics, LLC to extend the contract
term and allow additional expenditures for Growth Projection and Land Use
Assumptions Update Services for the Planning and Development Department. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures will not exceed $300,000.

Summary
This contract assists with organizing development and land use data, reporting on
existing and planned development profiles, and preparing growth projections for the
City and specific sub-regions within the City. These services will help the City to
prepare for ongoing updates and twice-yearly maintenance of the custom development
tracking tool. The work includes updating mid-cycle land use forecasts using the
Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity’s 2025 population projections and employment
forecasts from the University of Arizona’s Economic and Business Research Center (or
similar forecasting sources).

Contract Term
This amendment will extend the contract period end date to July 31, 2027.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $300,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $714,000. Funds are available in the Planning and
Development Department’s operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Growth Projections and Land Use Assumptions Update, Contract 156366 (Ordinance
S-48639) on May 25, 2022.






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Professional Services for Oracle Environment Contract - RFA 25-0681 Request
for Award (Ordinance S-52301) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into a
contract with LCS Technologies, Inc. to provide information technology professional
services for the City's Oracle environment to departments Citywide. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of
the contract will not exceed $22,988,669.

Summary
This contract will provide professional services for the City's Oracle environment. The
City uses Oracle applications and technologies across multiple departments Citywide
and several critical Citywide systems and it continues to invest in numerous Oracle
products. These systems require continuous support for all Oracle engineered
systems, Oracle databases and other system products that City departments and the
public use daily. These professional services are essential to ensure the reliability,
security, and optimal performance of these critical systems, which minimize downtime
and enhance operational efficiency.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstance Without Competition. Competition for this Oracle staff
augmentation and support is not recommended due to the unique circumstances in the
City’s Oracle environment configuration. These circumstances require extensive
background security verification, on-boarding, departmental service knowledge
transfer, and system training to provide effective project and 24x7 support. There are
several critical departmental database projects planned in future years and many in-
flight projects this year.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about December 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no



options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $22,988,669 for the five-year aggregate
term. Funding is available in the various departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Electronic Submittal and Verification Certified Payrolls - EXC 21-133 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-52304) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to allow
additional expenditures under Contract 155571 with AskReply, Inc. dba B2GNOW for
the purchase of electronic payroll verification for the Office of the City Engineer and in
support of departments Citywide. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$14,800.

Summary
This contract will provide software that monitors contractor and subcontractor payrolls
for federally funded construction projects, ensuring compliance with Davis-Bacon wage
requirements. Growth in the capital improvement program, and additional federal
funding, have expanded the volume of construction projects. This drives the need for
enhanced payroll monitoring capabilities.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending October 26, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $14,800 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $283,422. Funds are available in the operating budgets of the
Office of the City Engineer and the Housing Department.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Electronic Submittal and Verification Certified Payrolls; Contract 155571; Ordinance
S-48021 on October 27, 2021.
· Electronic Submittal and Verification Certified Payrolls; Contract 155571; Ordinance
S-49653 on May 3, 2023.



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Gina Montes, the City Engineer and the Housing Department.








Report

Armed, Unarmed, and Event Security Guard Contracts - RFQu 23-117 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-52307) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to allow
additional expenditures under Contracts 159435, 159440, 159437, and 159438 with
Superior Protection Services, Inc.; Surveillance Security, Inc.; Universal Protection
Service, L.P. dba Allied Universal Security Services; and Windom Security Strategies
Today, LLC for the purchase of security services for Citywide use. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $22,500,000.

Summary
The contracts provide armed, unarmed, and event security guard services for
departments Citywide. Security guard services are utilized by various departments for
securing public and private property, monitoring City facilities, patrolling City parks,
providing fire watch services, and securing City-sponsored events and more. Overall,
these contracts will help to ensure the safety and protection of City-personnel,
infrastructure, and properties. Additional funds are necessary due to an increase in
usage of security guard services associated with the opening of the 100 West
Washington building, special events coverage in and outside of City Hall and Council
Chambers, and overnight security at City parks. The need for services is routinely
evaluated, and as applicable, services are increased.

Contract Term
The contract terms remain unchanged, ending on November 30, 2028.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $22,500,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contracts will not exceed $36,500,000. Funds are available in the various departments'
operating and capital budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Armed, Unarmed and Event Security Guard Services Contracts 159437, 159435,
159440 and 159438 (Ordinance S-50302) on November 1, 2023.



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Portable Toilet Rentals and Servicing Contract - IFB-25-0534 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-52309) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into
contracts with Proper Site Services LLC and United Site Services of Nevada, Inc. to
provide portable toilet rentals and servicing of portable toilets for Citywide use. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
total value of the contracts will not exceed $1,100,000.

Summary
This contract will provide short-term and long-term rentals and servicing of portable
toilets, portable restroom trailers, and portable hand washing stations to departments
Citywide. Portable restrooms and hand washing stations are needed in various City-
owned or leased locations, such as the airport campus, public parks, public safety
training facilities, and other outdoor facilities in which access to permanent restroom is
not available or is limited. These rental units are accessed by City staff, contractors,
and visitors and are critical to ensure public health and safety, accommodate large
event crowds, reduce strain on permanent restroom, and support inclusive access for
all ages and abilities.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Six vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendor(s):

Proper Site Services LLC
United Site Services of Nevada, Inc.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about November 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend the term.




Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $1,100,000. Funding is available
in the various departments’ operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Acceptance and Dedication of Easements and a Deed for Multi Use Trail, Public
Utility, Sidewalk and Roadway Purposes (Ordinance S-52310) - Districts 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 7, & 8

Request for the City Council to accept easements and a deed for multi-use trail, public
utility, sidewalk, and roadway purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal
descriptions are recorded via separate recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting and dedicating the property interests below will meet the Planning and
Development Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process Requirement prior
to releasing any permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
MCR: 20250483003
Applicant and Grantor: Circle Mountain Holdings, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: August 21, 2025
Purpose: Multi-Use Trail
Location: Northeast corner of Interstate 17 Frontage Road and W. Circle Mountain
Road.
APN: 202-22-002B; 202-22-002C
File: 250067
Council District: 1

Easement (b)
MCR: 20250483002
Applicant and Grantor: Circle Mountain Holdings, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: August 21, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: Northeast corner of Interstate 17 Frontage Road and W. Circle Mountain
Road.
APN: 202-22-002A; 202-22-002B; 202-22-002C
File: 250067
Council District: 1




Easement (c)
MCR: 20250497131
Applicant and Grantor: Kyle Greiert and Heather Greiert; its successor and assigns
Date: August 28, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 5202 E. Emile Zola Avenue
APN: 167-05-082
File: 250081
Council District: 2

Easement (d)
MCR: 20250425421
Applicant and Grantor: Bell Road and 32 St LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: July 24, 2025
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 3152 E. Bell Road
APN: 214-03-151C
File: 250062
Council District: 2

Easement (e)
MCR: 20250482998
Applicant and Grantor: Jacksons Food Stores, Inc.; its successor and assigns
Date: August 21, 2025
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 12010 N. Tatum Boulevard
APN: 167-45-001M
File: 250068
Council District: 3

Easement (f)
MCR: 20250425420
Applicant and Grantor: AZ Home Buyer LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: July 24, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 2119 W. Elm Street
APN: 154-02-096B
File: 250072
Council District: 4

Easement (g)


MCR: 20250482994
Applicant and Grantor: 101 Logistics Owner, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: August 21, 2025
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: Southeast corner of State Route 101 and W. Indian School Road
APN: 102-25-002V
File: 250038
Council District: 5

Easement (h)
MCR: 20250482996
Applicant and Grantor: 101 Logistics Owner, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: August 21, 2025
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: Southeast corner of State Route 101 and W. Indian School Road
APN: 102-25-002V
File: 250040
Council District: 5

Easement (i)
MCR: 20250482999
Applicant and Grantor: 101 Logistics Owner, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: August 21, 2025
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: Southeast corner of State Route 101 and W. Indian School Road
APN: 102-25-002V
File: 250041
Council District: 5

Easement (j)
MCR: 20250482995
Applicant and Grantor: Sovereign Grace Bible Church of Phoenix; its successor and
assigns
Date: August 21, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 2940 W. Bethany Home Road
APN: 152-16-002C; 152-16-002D; 152-16-179A
File: 250074
Council District: 7

Deed (k)


MCR: 20240671272
Applicant and Grantor: TA Operating LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: December 18, 2024
Purpose: Roadway
Location: 6741 W. Latham Street
APN: 102-41-013Z
File: 240097
Council District: 7

Easement (l)
MCR: 20250425419
Applicant and Grantor: 2553 Wier Ave, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: July 24, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 2553 E. Wier Avenue
APN: 122-55-003A
File: 250055
Council District: 8

Easement (m)
MCR: 20250490163
Applicant and Grantor: 1 2 3 Flooring, Inc.; its successor and assigns
Date: August 25, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 2553 E. Wier Avenue
APN: 122-55-003B
File: 250055
Council District: 8

Easement (n)
MCR: 20250490170
Applicant and Grantor: Brown Family Realestate Enterprises, LLC; its successor and
assigns
Date: August 25, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 301 E. Dobbins Road
APN: 300-63-033L
File: 250075
Council District: 8




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Acceptance of an Easement for Water Purposes (Ordinance S-52326) - District 2

Request for the City Council to accept an easement for water purposes, further
ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via separate
recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process Requirement prior to releasing
any permits to applicants.

Easements (a)
MCR: 20250497125
Applicant and Grantor: Governing Board of Directors for Maricopa County Community
College District; its successor and assigns
Date: August 28, 2025
Purpose: Water
Location: 18401 N. 32nd Street
APN: 214-01-882A
File: FN 250061
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Cameras, Including Accessories, Maintenance, and Repair Services Contract -
IFB-26-0005 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52334) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into
contracts with Adorama Inc.; B&H Foto & Electronics Corp.; and Tempe Camera
Repair, Inc. to provide cameras, accessories, and maintenance and repair services for
Citywide use. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $867,450.

Summary
These contracts will provide departments Citywide with various types of photography
cameras and accessories and maintenance and repair services, which are essential
for supporting a variety of key operational functions within departments Citywide.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Four vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendors:

Selected Bidders
· Adorama Inc. - Cameras and Accessories
· B&H Foto & Electronics Corp. - Cameras and Accessories
· Tempe Camera Repair, Inc. - Repair and Maintenance Services

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about November 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend the term.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $867,450. Funding is available in
the various departments' operating budgets.



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Janitorial Supplies Contract - COOP 25-0043 Request for Award (Ordinance S-
52341) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into a
contract with Brady Industries of Arizona, LLC dba Brady Industries, a disregarded
entity of Brady Acqco., LLC, to provide janitorial supplies and equipment for Citywide
use. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $18,000,000.

Summary
This contract will be used to purchase janitorial, sanitation supplies, and equipment for
all City departments. Janitorial supplies are an essential component of the City's
operations to ensure facilities are safe and hygienic for City employees and the
general public. Janitorial supplies include, but are not limited to toilet paper, hand
washing soap, cleaning supplies, etc. This request seeks authorization to make
purchases under the OMNIA Partners Cooperative Contract 152610. The primary
departments using this contract are Aviation, Fire, Parks and Recreation, Phoenix
Convention Center, Public Works, and Street Transportation.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
based on an approved Determination Memo citing Special Circumstance - Alternative
Competition. The contract was awarded through a competitive process consistent with
the City's procurement processes, as set forth in the Phoenix City Code, chapter 43.
The OMNIA Partners Cooperative Contract covers the purchase of a diverse and
extensive supply of janitorial and sanitation supplies as required for all City
departments. The use of this cooperative contract will provide the City with national
discounts on these products.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about November 1, 2025, for a five-year term with a one-
year option to extend the term.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $18,000,000 for the aggregate term.



Funding is available in the various departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Public Outreach and Community Engagement Services Contract - RFQu-25-0511
- Request for Award (Ordinance S-52347) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into
contracts with Ardurra Group, Inc.; ARG Coaching & Consulting Group LLC; Axis
Culture Group LLC; Be Bravely Bold LLC; Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC; The
Colibri Collective LLC; Gunn Communications, Inc. dba The Barnhart Company; HDR
Engineering, Inc.; Keen Independent Research LLC; Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.;
Logan Simpson Design Inc.; Lumen Strategies Arizona LLC; Velasco Consulting, LLC
dba Novle; ON Advertising LLC; Pinnacle Prevention Corp.; Raftelis Financial
Consultants, Inc.; Riester Sonoran, LLC; Samira Cook dba Purposeful World
Strategies; The Gentles Agency, LLC; Tripepi Smith and Associates, Inc.; Unlimited
Potential, Inc.; and Your Project Marketing & Outreach, LLC to provide public
engagement and community outreach services for Citywide use. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of
the contracts will not exceed $6,000,000.

Summary
This contract will provide public outreach and community engagement services. For all
services, selected contractors are expected to maintain effective communication with
City staff whether working independently or closely with the individual department
contacts. The selected contractors will develop and implement strategies to effectively
reach and involve diverse community members on an as-needed basis in collaboration
with each individual department in order to obtain feedback and input from constituents
and applicable stakeholders for City projects and initiatives.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL).

A total of 31 offerors submitted qualifications and 30 were deemed to be responsive
and responsible. An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on
the following minimum qualifications:
· Method of approach
· Experience and Expertise


· Capacity

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following offerors:
· Ardurra Group, Inc.
· ARG Coaching & Consulting Group LLC
· Axis Culture Group LLC
· Be Bravely Bold LLC
· Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC
· The Colibri Collective LLC
· Gunn Communications, Inc. dba The Barnhart Company
· HDR Engineering, Inc.
· Keen Independent Research LLC
· Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
· Logan Simpson Design Inc.
· Lumen Strategies Arizona LLC
· Velasco Consulting, LLC dba Novle
· ON Advertising LLC
· Pinnacle Prevention Corp.
· Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc.
· Riester Sonoran, LLC
· Samira Cook dba Purposeful World Strategies
· The Gentles Agency, LLC
· Tripepi Smith and Associates, Inc.
· Unlimited Potential, Inc.
· Your Project Marketing & Outreach, LLC

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about October 15, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $6,000,000. Funding is available
in the various departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.





Report

Amend Personnel Rules 1, 7 through 11, 15, and 21 (Ordinance S-52346) -
Citywide

Request City Council approval of amendments to City of Phoenix Personnel Rules 1,
7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, and 21 (Attachment A). This action establishes final rules and
adopts changes to update and streamline the City's Personnel Rules.

Summary
The proposed amendments are designed to update definitions and more accurately
reflect and improve current City practices.

Public Outreach
A public meeting was conducted by the Human Resources Department on September
17, 2025, to formally solicit comments on the proposed amendments.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Human
Resources Department.





ATTACHMENT A


RULE 1

DEFINITIONS

"Applicant" means a person who has filed an application for a position.

"Appointing Power, Authority, or Officer" means the City Manager or other legally
designated official having the power of appointment and removal of employees.

"Apprentice" means an unclassified employee in a formalized apprenticeship program.

"Board," when used alone, means the Civil Service Board of the City of Phoenix.

"Break in Service" means dismissal, resignation, retirement, or status change to part-time.

"Calendar Days" shall be used for all employees regardless of work schedules when
specified in the Rules. Unless otherwise specified, "days" shall mean calendar days
within these Rules.

"Candidate" means a person participating in an examination or selection process.

"Class or Classification" means a position or group of positions sufficiently similar in
respect to their duties and responsibilities that the same requirements as to education,
experience, knowledge, ability, and other qualifications are required of the occupants,
and substantially the same tests of fitness are used to choose qualified employees, and
substantially the same schedule of compensation can be made to apply APPLIED with
equity under the same or substantially the same employment conditions.

"Class Title" means the designation given to a class, to each position allocated to the
class, and to the occupant of each position.

"Classification Schedule or Plan" means the plan, system or schedule APPROVED BY
CITY COUNCIL for the classification of all positions in the classified service, based upon
the duties, responsibilities, and qualifications of each position, which is approved by the

"Classified Service" means all offices, positions, and employments in the service of the
Charter of the City of Phoenix.

"Competitive Promotional List" means a list of names of employees who successfully
completed promotional competitive tests of fitness for a class of position, ranked
according to the results of the evaluation process.

"Demotion" means the transfer of an employee from a position in a higher class to a
position in a lower class for which the maximum rate of pay is lower. Removal of special
assignment pay or the transfer of an employee into classification in a different Meet and
Confer Unit does not constitute demotion. Equivalency shall be determined by the Human
Resources Director.


"Discharge, Dismissal, or Removal" means the separation of an employee from
City employment.

"Discipline" means the suspension, demotion, or dismissal of an employee.

"Eligible" means a person whose name is recorded on a current original employment
eligible, reinstatement, promotional, or recall list ADMINISTRATIVE LIST, ELIGIBLE
EMPLOYMENT LIST, PROCESS-BASED EMPLOYMENT LIST, REINSTATEMENT
LIST, PROMOTIONAL LIST, OR RECALL LIST.

"Employee" means a person who is legally an occupant of a position in the City service
or who is on an authorized leave of absence, and whose position is held open for them
upon their return.

"Employment Lists" means lists of persons who successfully qualified for employment as
determined by the various methods of evaluating qualifications. Employment lists include:
‘ADMINISTRATIVE LISTS,’ 'Recall Lists,' 'Reinstatement Lists,' 'SWORN Promotional
Lists,' and 'Eligible EMPLOYMENT Lists.,' AND ‘PROCESS-BASED EMPLOYMENT
LISTS.’

"Equivalent Classification" means two or more classifications that are judged to be
sufficiently similar in qualifications that an employee who is successful in one can
reasonably be expected to be successful in the other, or a list of eligibles for one can be
utilized in making appointments to position vacancies in the other.

"Examination" means the objective testing of applicants to create a list of eligible
candidates. This includes written examinations, as well as demonstration, practical, or
assessment examinations administered by staff designated by the Human Resources
Director.

"Full-Time Employment" means being employed with a work schedule consisting of the
number of full-time hours (minimum 40 hours per week) designated for the position, and
with a work schedule intended to be continuous over a period of 12 months.

"Hourly" means a position that is subject (non-exempt) to the provisions of the federal Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

"Interim" means appointment of a classified employee to an unclassified position that is
limited in time and is for the purpose of accommodating the absence of an employee on
extended leave or for the purpose of accomplishing a special limited- time project. The
classified employee receiving an interim appointment shall retain his classified service
status.

"Inactive Status" means an employee who is absent from work on a leave of absence,
and has exhausted their paid leave banks.

"Job Sharing" means employment of two people in the same position that is budgeted on
a regular full-time basis, where the two employees share the full-time work hours of the
position. Job sharing is in the unclassified service, and such employment shall not earn


credits toward the completion of probationary period requirements.

"Non-Competitive Promotional List" means a list of employees whose increased
knowledge and skill in an entry-level classification in a career series, as attested to by the
appointing authority and approved by the Human Resources Director, qualifies the
employees for promotion to a journeyman level classification in the same career series.
Such list shall not be used for sworn public safety classifications.

"Part-Time Employment" means being employed in a position which is less than full-time,
but which has a regular schedule on a year-round basis as determined by the needs of
the employing department. Such employment shall not earn credits toward the
completion of probationary period requirements, and is not part of the classified service.

"Position" means a specific office or employment, whether occupied or vacant, calling for
the performance of certain duties and the carrying out of certain responsibilities, either on
a full-time, part-time, seasonal, or temporary basis.

"Promotion" means an advancement from a lower class to a higher class involving an
increase in responsibility. The higher class has a salary range that goes beyond the limit
fixed for the lower class. Additional pay ranges allowed for special assignments within
the class shall be considered part of the pay range of the class, and shall not constitute a
promotion. Transfer of an employee to an equivalent classification in a different Meet and
Confer Unit does not constitute a promotion. Equivalency shall be determined by the
Human Resources Director.

"Provisional" means an appointment of a person to a regular position without an
examination in the absence of an appropriate eligible list or availability of eligibles. Such
appointment shall be for not longer than EXCEED sixty working days, and shall earn
credits toward the completion of probationary period requirements.

"Public Notice" means notice given either by posting or publication, or both.

"Recall List" means a list of names of persons who were laid off from a class, or from
service on account of DUE TO lack of work or funds or any other cause, and whose names
were placed on said list in accordance with these Rules.

"Regular Employment" means being employed in a full-time budgeted position in the
classified service.

"Reinstatement List" means a list of names of persons who separated from service under
satisfactory conditions or who were demoted as a result of reduction in force or
reclassification, and whose names were placed on such list upon request of eligible
applicant.

"Salaried" means a position that is exempt from the provisions of the federal Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA) and is designated in the pay plan of the City of Phoenix.

"Selection Process" means the objective evaluation of certified eligible candidates to fill
vacant positions. This includes selecting candidates to interview, conducting interviews,
performing reference checks, and completing the required background check. Interviews


may include requests to perform functions which THAT simulate the requirements of the
job.

"Service" means:

Personal service of any discipline notice by delivery to the person named or to any
member of their family over the age of sixteen residing at their usual place of
residence;

Or

Deposit of the order NOTICE in the United States mails, certified return receipt
requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the last known address of the person to be
served.

"Suspension" means the temporary separation of an employee from the employee’s
position for disciplinary reasons. Salaried employees shall be suspended in full-day
increments consistent with the federal Fair Labor Standards Act.

"Temporary Employment" means being employed in a position that is temporary in nature
and is not an established regularly budgeted position. Such employment shall not earn
credits toward the completion of probationary period requirements, and is not part of the
classified service.”

"Trainee" means an employee in an unclassified transitional classification designed to
provide instruction and work experience and approved by the Human Resources
Committee.

"Transfer" means the assignment of an employee from one position in the City service to
another position for which the employee possesses the qualification requirements, and
the pay range of the new position is determined to be equivalent by the Human Resources
Director.

"Vacancy/Vacant Position" means a position that does not have an incumbent, and the
position has been approved for filling by the City Manager.

"Work Day - 56-Hour Employee" - In these Rules, the following equation shall be used
when considering employees who are assigned to a 56-hour work schedule:

3 consecutive work days = 2 shifts
5 consecutive work days = 3 shifts
30 work days = 14 shifts
60 work days = 27 shifts




RULE 7

RECRUITMENT, EXAMINATION, AND QUALIFICATION EVALUATION

7a. Notice of Recruitment Needs
The Human Resources Director shall release recruitment notices POSTINGS and
publicity deemed necessary to secure qualified applicants for City employment.
Recruitment notices shall be posted on the Human Resources Department website
and in locations designated by the Human Resources Director.

7b. Recruitment Schedule
The Human Resources Director shall recruit applicants for classes of employment to
meet the needs of City operations.

7c. Disqualification of Applicants
The Human Resources Director may reject any application or exclude the name of
any applicant from the eligible list or deny certification of any eligible who:

7c1. Is found to lack any of the qualification requirements specified in the position
classification plan CLASSIFICATION PLAN.

7c2. Does not meet the physical and mental OR health requirements of the class of
position to which the applicant seeks appointment. This does not include
disabilities that can be accommodated as provided in Rule 6a.

7c3. Does not meet the background screening standard CHECK STANDARDS
established for the position within the job class. Refer to Administrative
Regulation 2.81.

7c4. Has received a positive test result, failed to appear, or refused to submit to the
drug, alcohol, or other substance screening which is a requirement for the job
class to which the applicant seeks appointment.

7c5. Has been dismissed from previous employment for delinquency or other good
cause.

7c6. Has been dismissed previously from the City service for just cause, or whose
performance rating was below standard at the time of resignation.

7c7. Has made a materially false statement in the application or in the examination or
has practiced or attempted to practice deception or fraud in connection with such
application or examination.

7c8. Has taken an examination for the class as many times as allowed for a given
period by the Human Resources Director HAS ALLOWED FOR IN A GIVEN
PERIOD OF TIME.

7c9. Has been passed over for appointment for good cause, or has failed to appear
without good cause after accepting a notice of interview.


7c10. Is lacking in LACKS any other qualifications or standard STANDARDS of conduct
of equal gravity TO or exceeding those specifically enumerated in 7c1 - 7c9.

An applicant who is rejected, whose name is not posted, or whose name is removed
from an eligible list shall be notified of the action. The rejected applicant or eligible
may request a review of the action taken. This request shall be submitted to the
Human Resources Director in writing within seven days after the notice of action is
mailed. Such request for review shall not prevent the selection and hiring procedure
from going forward during the review period. The decision of the Human Resources
Director shall be final.

7d. Scope and Character of Qualification Evaluation
Screening of applicants shall consist of any qualification measurements that will
establish and confirm the qualifications of applicants required by the class for which
applicants are being evaluated.

7e. Examinations of Applicants
Examinations to measure the qualifications of applicants shall be conducted by the
Human Resources Director, or designee.

If requested, special test accommodations will be made for a disabled applicant if the
needed accommodations are consistent with the reasonable accommodations that
may be made on the job.

In order to qualify for employment, a candidate may be required to make a passing
grade in each part of the examination. This is in reference to any test type or rating
including, but not limited to, knowledge, demonstration, physical, personal fitness, or
other related testing measurements.

Written examination records and documentation that are proprietary shall not be made
available for public inspection or copying.

7f. Suspension of Recruitment
The Human Resources Director may SUSPEND A RECRUITMENT UPON
SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT THE RECRUITMENT HAS NOT GARNERED
SUFFICIENT APPLICANTS MEETING THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF QUALIFICATION
MEASUREMENTS AND THAT THE POSITION CANNOT BE FILLED BY THE
PRESENTED CANDIDATE POOL, in case of a vacancy in a position requiring
peculiar and exceptional qualifications of a scientific, professional, or expert character,
upon satisfactory evidence that recruitment is impractical and that the position can
best be filled by the selection of some designated person of recognized attainments,
suspend recruitment.

7g. Promotional Examinations
Applications for promotions shall be subject to the requirements and procedures
provided in these Rules, except that applicants for promotion shall not be entitled to
disability or veterans' preference. Positions in classes above the entrance level
classes shall be filled by competitive or non- competitive promotional examinations
whenever there is a sufficient number of employees who have the experience,
training, and other qualifications required by the higher level classes. If qualified
applicants for position vacancies in the higher classes are not present in the City

service, or the best interests of the City service would not be served, then the position
vacancies in the higher classes shall be filled by open competitive examinations. The
class qualification requirements shall be complied with in any promotional
examination.

Promotional examinations are open to employees in the City service and to individuals
on recall lists, each of whom meets the requirements specified in the Rules and the
Position Classification Plan.

The total length of authorized service shall be allowed as a seniority score in one part
of the promotional examination. An employee who is receiving pension benefits as a
result of retirement from the City under the Arizona Public Safety Personnel
Retirement System shall not receive seniority credits for the service time under the
Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement Plan. Two points for each complete year
of authorized service shall be allowed. For an incomplete year, proportionate credits
shall be allowed in the same ratio as the completed months of an incomplete year
relate to a complete year. Part-time and temporary employees shall not receive
seniority credits. A job sharing employee who had service as a regular full- time
employee immediately preceding the job share appointment, shall be credited with the
appropriate seniority score based on the individual's full- time employment plus pro-
rata credits earned in job share status.

7h. Examination Results
Once examination results have been completely evaluated and scored, the applicants
shall be notified of their examination results.

7h1. Written Examinations
For three business days beginning on the first business day following the
examination, a candidate who participated in any city CITY of Phoenix developed
examination may, in the presence of Human Resources staff, review a keyed
copy of the written examination and file a written notice of protest, stating the
item or items objected to and the reason for the objection. The written notice
must be filed by the end of the three-day review period.

Protests based upon purely personal opinions and without cited authority will not
be entertained. Properly made SUBMITTED protests will be considered by the
Human Resources Director before final examination scoring and release of
examination results. This review process and item objections will not be available
for proprietary tests obtained from a vendor.

For city CITY of Phoenix developed examinations completed on a computer, an
applicant may review their full examinations results immediately after or in lieu of
the review of the keyed copy of the written examination. Applicants may not
submit a written notice of protest on any items after viewing their full examination
results.

For examinations completed on written scoresheets, an applicant may review
their full examination results within five business days from the date that the
notice of examination results was sent. If the review should disclose any errors,
the examination record shall be modified to show a correct record. If the


modification affects the records of other applicants, their records shall also be
modified.

Such written protest WRITTEN PROTESTS shall not delay the next phase of the
testing process or the certification and appointment of qualified eligibles.

Examination records and documentation that are proprietary (i.e. vendor
procured, validated exams) are not public documents.

7h2. Demonstration, Practical, or Assessment Examinations
The purpose of this type of examination is to objectively measure an applicant’s
ability to perform in practical situations which THAT simulate the requirements of
the job.

Within five business days from the date that the notice of examination results was
sent, an applicant may request and be told the sections of RECEIVE
INFORMATION ABOUT the objective exercise where points were deducted from
their score, however, they. TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE
EXAMINATION, THE APPLICANT will not be able to challenge the results or view
the actual score sheets, as to protect the integrity of the test.

The review period will be the same as set forth in Personnel Rule 7h1.

7i. The following is a provision of State IS REQUIRED BY STATE law. It is included here
as a guide to be used for employment with the City of Phoenix:

PREFERENCE POINTS

The laws of the State of Arizona require that cities provide preference points for
veterans of the Armed Forces of the United States, for the spouse or surviving
spouse of certain veterans, and for a person with a disability. These preference
points do not apply on promotional examinations.

A. A veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States, separated from the
Armed Forces under honorable conditions following more than 180
consecutive calendar days of active duty, who takes an entrance examination
for employment with the City shall, in the determination of their final rating on
such examination, be given a preference of five points. The preference shall
be added to the grade earned by such veteran, but only if such veteran earns
a passing grade without preference.

B. A person with a disability who takes an entrance examination for employment
with the City shall, in the determination of their final rating on such
examination, be given a preference of five points. The preference shall be
added to the grade earned, but only if such person earns a passing grade
without preference.

C. For the purposes of subsection 7iB of this section, "a person with a disability"
means anyone who has a physical or mental impairment which substantially
limits one or more of their major life activities or has a record of such an


impairment or is regarded as having such an impairment.

D. A person qualified for a preference pursuant to both subsection 7iA and
subsection 7iB shall be given a ten-point preference.

E. A spouse or surviving spouse of any of the following, otherwise qualified
pursuant to subsection 7iA, shall be given a five-point preference as if such
spouse or surviving spouse were an eligible veteran pursuant to subsection
7iA:

1. Any veteran who died of a service-connected disability.

2. Any member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who, at the time
of application, is listed by the Secretary of Defense of the United States in
any of the following categories for not less than ninety days:

a. Missing in action.
b. Captured in the line of duty by a hostile force.
c. Forcibly detained or interned in the line of duty by a foreign government
or power.

3. A person who has a total, permanent disability resulting from a service-
connected disability or any person who died while such disability was in
existence.

F. An honorably separated veteran who served on active duty in the Armed
Forces at any time and who has a service-connected disability and is
receiving compensation or disability retirement benefits under laws
administered by the Veterans Administration, Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast
Guard, or public health service shall be given a ten-point preference pursuant
to this section.

G. No person eligible for a preference pursuant to this action shall be allowed
more than a ten-point preference.

H. Proof of Qualification - Proof of eligibility for veteran preference or preference
for a person with a disability shall be presented to the Human Resources
Department upon request.




RULE 8

EMPLOYMENT LISTS

8a. Types of Employment Lists
Employment lists consist of five SIX types including recall list, reinstatement list,
transfer list, promotional list, and original employment eligible list OF LISTS. THE
FOLLOWING SECTION WILL OUTLINE THE PURPOSE OF EACH LIST,
DURATION AND UTILIZATION.

• ADMINISTRATIVE LIST
• ELIGIBLE EMPLOYMENT LIST (CONTINUOUS)
• PROCESS-BASED EMPLOYMENT LIST (POSITION BASED)
• RECALL LIST
• REINSTATEMENT LIST
• SWORN PROMOTIONAL LIST

THE HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR MAY REMOVE THE NAMES OF ELIGIBLES
FROM ANY EMPLOYMENT LIST FOR ANY OF THE REASONS STATED IN THESE
RULES. ELIGIBLES WHOSE NAMES ARE REMOVED FROM EMPLOYMENT LISTS
SHALL BE SENT NOTICE OF SUCH ACTION.

8b. Posting of Names to Employment ADMINISTRATIVE Lists
All persons whose names appear on employment lists shall have attained positions
on such lists by the successful demonstration of their fitness for employment in the
class. The Human Resources Director shall approve the posting of names to
employment lists in accordance with the provisions of Rules 8c-8h inclusive. Persons
whose names are approved on employment lists shall be eligible for employment.
AN ADMINISTRATIVE LIST SHALL CONSIST OF THE NAMES OF EMPLOYEES
WHO ARE PLACED ON THE LIST AT THE REQUEST OF THEIR DEPARTMENT
HEAD OR HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR.

PLACEMENT OF AN EMPLOYEE ON AN ADMINISTRATIVE LIST REQUIRES THE
APPROVAL OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE.

AN ELIGIBLE MAY NORMALLY HAVE ELIGIBILITY ON AN ADMINISTRATIVE LIST
UP TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE YEAR.

8c. Duration of Eligibility ELIGIBLE EMPLOYMENT LIST (CONTINUOUS)
An eligible may normally have eligibility on an employment list up to a maximum of
two years. The maximum time of eligibility on a recall list shall be three years. If the
Human Resources Director believes that an employment list should be supplemented
with additional eligibles, may direct a new recruitment for the classification, with
existing eligibles being automatically placed on the new list for such time as may
remain on their original eligibility. The Human Resources Director may modify the
length of eligibility at the onset of a recruitment procedure and in unusual situations,
may extend an eligible list for an additional year.

Names of eligibles may be removed from any employment list by the Human
Resources Director for any of the reasons stated in these Rules. Eligibles whose


names are removed from employment lists shall be sent notice of such action.

An employee whose name appears on an existing promotional list when entering
military service with the Armed Services of the United States of America during time
of war shall continue to have eligibility on such list until ninety days after being
honorably discharged or released from military service.
AN ELIGIBLE EMPLOYMENT LIST SHALL CONSIST OF THE NAMES OF
APPLICANTS WHO SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATED THAT THEIR
QUALIFICATIONS WERE SUITABLE FOR THE CLASS OF EMPLOYMENT NAMED
IN THEIR APPLICATIONS. THE NAMES ON AN ELIGIBLE EMPLOYMENT LIST MAY
BE LISTED ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANTS’ SCORE OR RANK, THROUGH THE
QUALIFICATION MEASUREMENTS USED. THIS LIST MAY BE USED BY HIRING
MANAGERS CITYWIDE TO FILL VACANCIES.

ELIGIBLE EMPLOYMENT LISTS MAY BE POSTED ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS TO
ALLOW FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF SUCCESSFUL APPLICANTS DURING THE
APPLICATION PERIOD. ONCE LISTS HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTED OR EXPIRE, A
NEW POSTING MAY BE GENERATED TO ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL APPLICANTS
TO SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATE THEIR QUALIFICATIONS.

THE HIRING MANAGER(S) MAY ACCESS THE LIST TO FILL A VACANCY.
APPLICANTS NOT SELECTED WILL REMAIN ON THE LIST UNTIL THE LIST
EXPIRES.

PLACEMENT ON AN ELIGIBLE EMPLOYMENT LIST DOES NOT GUARANTEE
CONSIDERATION TO ALL LISTS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION. PROCESS-BASED
EMPLOYMENT LISTS MAY BE ADVERTISED CONCURRENT TO ELIGIBLE
EMPLOYMENT LISTS. INTERESTED APPLICANTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO APPLY
TO EACH RECRUITMENT THAT THE APPLICANT EXPRESSES AN INTEREST IN.

ELIGIBILITY FOR TRAINEE AND APPRENTICE CLASSIFICATIONS MAY HAVE
THEIR NAME PLACED ON THE ELIGIBLE LIST OF THE CLASS FOR WHICH THEY
ARE TRAINING, WHEN IT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED THAT THEY HAVE
SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE PRESCRIBED TRAINING PROGRAM. THE
NAME OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE
REQUIREMENTS OF A CITY-SPONSORED TRAINING OR APPRENTICESHIP
PROGRAM MAY APPLY TO BE NON-COMPETITIVELY PROMOTED TO THE
ENTRY-LEVEL CLASS FOR WHICH THE INDIVIDUAL IS TRAINED, AFTER
PASSING THE APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AS DETERMINED BY THE
PROGRAM.

AN ELIGIBLE MAY NORMALLY HAVE ELIGIBILITY ON AN EMPLOYMENT LIST UP
TO A MAXIMUM OF TWO YEARS.


8d. Promotional Lists PROCESS-BASED EMPLOYMENT LIST (POSITION BASED)
Promotional lists shall consist of the names of employees, or individuals on recall lists,
who have qualified by competitive or non-competitive promotional examination. An
eligible shall not continue on a promotional list if they separate from City employment,



but may have their name returned to the promotional list if they return to City
employment and the time limit of eligibility has not expired.
PROCESS-BASED EMPLOYMENT LISTS SHALL CONSIST OF NAMES OF
APPLICANTS WHO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY DEMONSTRATED THAT THEIR
QUALIFICATIONS WERE SUITABLE FOR THE CLASS OF EMPLOYMENT NAMED
IN THEIR APPLICATION.

PROCESS-BASED EMPLOYMENT LISTS MAY BE POSTED ON AN AS-NEEDED
BASIS TO ALLOW FOR COLLECTION OF SUCCESSFUL APPLICANTS DURING
THE APPLICATION PERIOD UNTIL A SELECTION IS DETERMINED.

APPLICANTS ON A PROCESS-BASED EMPLOYMENT LIST MAY BE
CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIFIC SELECTION PROCESS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE
MULTIPLE CLASSIFICATIONS AND/OR POSITIONS.

PROCESS-BASED EMPLOYMENT LISTS ARE DESIGNED TO FILL VACANCIES
AT THE TIME THAT THE LIST IS BEING ESTABLISHED. WHEN A HIRING
DECISION HAS BEEN MADE, THE LIST WILL BE CLOSED AND APPLICANTS
WILL BE NOTIFIED.

AN ELIGIBLE MAY NORMALLY HAVE ELIGIBILITY ON A PROCESS-BASED
EMPLOYMENT LIST FOR A MAXIMUM OF ONE YEAR.

8e. Employment Eligible RECALL List
An employment list shall consist of the names of applicants who successfully
demonstrated that their qualifications were suitable for the class of employment
named in their applications. Such lists shall result from recruitment open to applicants
both outside and inside the City service. The names on an employment list shall be
listed according to the excellence demonstrated by the applicants, through the
qualification measurements used.

Employment lists may be placed on an open basis to allow continuous posting of
successful applicants.

Eligibility for Trainee classifications may be limited to present City employees, or those
enrolled in a City-sponsored pre-employment training program. A Trainee may have
their name placed on the eligible list of the class for which they are training, when it
has been demonstrated that they have successfully completed the prescribed training
program.

The name of an individual who has successfully completed the requirements of a City-
sponsored pre-employment training program may be placed on the eligible list for the
entry-level class for which the individual is trained, after passing the appropriate
examination.
A RECALL LIST CONSISTS OF THE NAMES OF LAID-OFF EMPLOYEES WHOSE
APPLICATIONS FOR POSITIONS ON SUCH LIST WERE APPROVED BY THE
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR. THE RANKING OF NAMES ON RECALL LISTS
SHALL BE IN THE ORDER PROVIDED BY LAYOFF RULES.


THE MAXIMUM TIME AN ELIGIBLE MAY REMAIN ON A RECALL LIST SHALL BE
THREE YEARS.

8f. Recall REINSTATEMENT List
A recall list shall consist of the names of laid-off employees whose applications for
positions on such list were approved by the Human Resources Director. The ranking
of names on recall lists shall be in the order provided by layoff rules.
A REINSTATEMENT LIST CONSISTS OF THE NAMES OF FORMER EMPLOYEES
WHO RESIGNED IN GOOD STANDING OR FOR ACTIVE EMPLOYEES WHO
VOLUNTARILY DEMOTED FROM A CLASS OF THE CITY SERVICE AND WHOSE
APPLICATIONS FOR POSITIONS ON SUCH A LIST WERE APPROVED BY THE
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR.

WHEN AN EMPLOYEE WHO HAS BEEN CERTIFIED TO A REINSTATEMENT LIST
CONTINUES TO WORK ON A PART-TIME OR TEMPORARY CAPACITY IN THE
SAME CLASSIFICATION, THE PERIOD OF ELIGIBILITY WILL CONTINUE UNTIL
SUCH TIME AS THE EMPLOYEE IS EITHER REEMPLOYED IN A REGULAR
POSITION OR HAS FAILED TO WORK IN A TEMPORARY OR PART-TIME
CAPACITY FOR A PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS. THE NAMES ON A
REINSTATEMENT LIST SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
THESE RULES.

AN ELIGIBLE MAY NORMALLY HAVE ELIGIBILITY ON AN EMPLOYMENT LIST UP
TO A MAXIMUM OF TWO YEARS.

8g. Reinstatement List SWORN PROMOTIONAL LISTS
A reinstatement list is one consisting of the names of former employees who resigned
or for active employees who voluntarily demoted from a class of the City service and
whose applications for positions on such a list were approved by the Human
Resources Director. When an employee who has been certified to a reinstatement list
continues to work on a part-time or temporary capacity in the same classification, the
period of eligibility will continue until such time as the employee is either reemployed
in a regular position or has failed to work in a temporary or part-time capacity for a
period of six months. The names on such list shall be in accordance with the
provisions of these Rules.
SWORN PROMOTIONAL LISTS SHALL CONSIST OF THE NAMES OF
EMPLOYEES, OR INDIVIDUALS ON RECALL LISTS, WHO HAVE QUALIFIED BY
COMPETITIVE OR NON-COMPETITIVE PROMOTIONAL EXAMINATION. AN
ELIGIBLE SHALL NOT CONTINUE ON A SWORN PROMOTIONAL LIST IF THEY
SEPARATE FROM CITY EMPLOYMENT, BUT THEY MAY HAVE THEIR NAME
RETURNED TO THE PROMOTIONAL LIST IF THEY RETURN TO CITY
EMPLOYMENT AND THE TIME LIMIT OF ELIGIBILITY HAS NOT EXPIRED.

AN ELIGIBLE MAY NORMALLY HAVE ELIGIBILITY ON A SWORN PROMOTIONAL
LIST UP TO A MAXIMUM OF TWO YEARS. THIS TIME LIMIT MAY BE EXTENDED
WITH APPROVAL OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR.

AN EMPLOYEE WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON AN EXISTING SWORN
PROMOTIONAL LIST WHEN ENTERING MILITARY SERVICE WITH THE ARMED
SERVICES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DURING TIME OF WAR SHALL
CONTINUE TO HAVE ELIGIBILITY ON SUCH LIST UNTIL NINETY DAYS AFTER

BEING HONORABLY DISCHARGED OR RELEASED FROM MILITARY SERVICE.

8h. Transfer Lists
A transfer list shall consist of the names of employees who

8h1. Are unable for physical reasons, as certified by a licensed physician, to perform
the essential functions of their present assignment;

8h2. Voluntarily request the placement of their names on such a list;

8h3. Are placed on the list at the request of their department head.

Placement of an employee on a transfer list requires the approval of the Human
Resources Director.




RULE 9

CERTIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT

9a. Method of Filling Vacancies
All vacancies in any class of position in the classified service shall be filled by an
eligible from an appropriate eligible list or by a provisional appointment in the absence
of an eligible list by one of the following methods:

9a1. Demotion;
9a2. Certification and Appointment from recall list RECALL LIST;
9a3. Certification and Appointment from transfer list ADMINISTRATIVE LIST;
9a4. Certification and Appointment from promotional list SWORN PROMOTIONAL
LIST;
9a5. Certification and Appointment from open competitive eligible list ELIGIBLE
EMPLOYMENT LIST OR PROCESS-BASED EMPLOYMENT LIST;
9a6. Certification and Appointment from reinstatement list REINSTATEMENT LIST;
9a7. Provisional Appointment of non-eligibles.

9b. Method of Certification
9b1. Requisition: When a vacancy is to be filled, and when the appointing authority
requests, the Human Resources Director shall ANNOUNCE THE INTENT TO
FILL THE VACANCY AND make certification of eligibles on a form provided by
the Human Resources Department INFORMATION ABOUT THE VACANCY
AVAILABLE TO ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS. THE ANNOUNCEMENT SHALL
CONTAIN DETAILS RELATED TO THE POSITION INCLUDING
CLASSIFICATION, REQUIRED QUALIFICATIONS, PAY RATES, AND
LOCATION.

9b2. Certification: The Human Resources Director, except EXCEPT as otherwise
provided in this Rule, THE HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR shall certify to the
appointing authority the names of persons on the appropriate employment list or
lists who have indicated a willingness to accept appointment to a position
vacancy. If the list of qualified persons is excessively long, the Human Resources
Director may certify names in workable numbers to the appointing authority in
the order of their placement on the eligible list.

Whenever the establishment of special qualifications for the particular position
has been requested by the appointing authority and approved by the Human
Resources Director, certification shall be limited to those eligibles on the
appropriate list possessing the special qualifications established.

In the case of promotional examinations in the Police and Fire Services, the
names of the five persons ranked highest on the appropriate list who have
indicated a willingness to accept appointment to a position vacancy shall be
certified. When more than one vacancy is to be filled, the number of names
submitted shall equal the number of vacancies plus four.

In the case of a recall list RECALL LIST, the highest name in accordance with
the layoff provisions of these Rules shall be certified to the appropriate authority
for a position vacancy.

9b3. Certification of Eligible to a Lower Class: An eligible may be certified to a position
in a lower class or an equivalent class. Acceptance AN ELIGIBLE’S
ACCEPTANCE of appointment to a position in such class shall not affect their
eligibility for certification to a position vacancy in the class in which they
established eligible rights through examination, provided eligibility exists when
the vacancy occurs.

9c. Notification of Eligibles to Report for Interview
When eligibles are certified to the appointing authority to fill a vacancy in the classified
service, said eligibles shall report for interview if requested. The notice shall contain
the title of the position to which eligibles have been certified, the pay range, the
location of the interview, and the time limit allowed to report for interview without
forfeiting eligibility rights.

9d. Waiver of Certification
The Human Resources Director may allow an eligible to waive certification to any
employment list. The eligible must make such request to the Human Resources
Director in writing, stating if the request is temporary or permanent, and the reason for
the waiver. An eligible whose request is temporary, and approved, shall not again be
called for selection of appointment until a request in writing is submitted and approved
for the removal of the temporary waiver. If reasons for requesting the removal of the
temporary waiver are unsatisfactory, the Human Resources Director may permanently
remove the name of the eligible from the employment list. Notice of such action shall
be sent to the eligible.

9e. Appointments
9e1. Selection and Appointment from Certified Eligibles: To fill a position vacancy, the
appointing authority shall select and appoint one of the certified eligibles except
as otherwise provided in this Rule.

When two or more applicants have equal qualifications in the judgment of the
appointing authority, preference in selection shall be given to a Phoenix resident
over a non- resident.

The appointing authority shall appoint the one certified eligible from the recall list
RECALL LIST to fill a position vacancy. Rejection of the one eligible certified from
the recall list RECALL LIST shall not be allowed other than as provided by Rule
7, except for such acts of conduct occurring between the date of layoff and date
of recall which THAT would be cause for dismissal of an employee.

9e2. Temporary Appointments: The duration of temporary appointments will be no
longer than twelve months without approval of the Human Resources Director.
Temporary appointments may or may not be made from an appropriate eligible
list. A refusal by an eligible to accept his THE appointment to a position of limited
duration shall not affect his THEIR eligibility to a regular appointment.

9e3. Provisional Appointments: Whenever the Human Resources Director determines
that an appropriate employment list is insufficient for the needs of the City, the
Human Resources Director may refer a non-eligible to a vacancy for provisional
appointment upon the request of the appointing authority, pending creation of a

new employment list. Such provisional appointments for all classes of positions
shall continue only for such period as may be necessary to establish an
employment list and make certification of CERTIFY eligibles. Such provisional
appointment shall not exceed 60 full working days. Time served in a provisional
status shall earn credits toward completion of probationary requirements.

9e4. “Interim” appointment: Whenever the Human Resources Director determines the
need to appoint a classified employee to an unclassified position that is limited in
time and is for the purpose of accommodating the absence of an employee on
extended leave or for the purpose of accomplishing a special limited-time project.
The classified employee receiving an interim appointment shall retain their
classified service status.




RULE 10

PROBATION

10a. Period of Probation
Every employee shall work satisfactorily for a period of probation equal to full-time
in each class for which they have qualified by examination, certification, and
appointment in order to satisfy the requirements for regular employment in that class.
A temporary appointment cannot satisfy regular employment status. Only an
employee with a regular or an interim appointment can be granted appeal status
after probationary requirements have been satisfied. The period of probation shall
consist of twelve continuous months of full-time service in the class except as herein
provided.

Time taken on paid vacation, sick leave, military leave, administrative leave, light
duty status, or while drawing compensation awarded by the Arizona Industrial
Commission, not in excess of thirty calendar days, shall be allowed the probationer
as creditable time served. If the period exceeds thirty calendar days, the entire period
of absence from normal duties shall be added to the probationary period.

An employee who demotes from a higher class to a lower class after completing
probation shall be required to serve a new probationary period in the higher class if
subsequently promoted to that class.

See Rule 20 for a voluntary demotion while serving a promotional probationary
period.

A new probationary period shall be served following any break in service.

10b. Entitlement to Civil Service Board Hearing
A dismissed, suspended, or demoted probationary employee shall not be entitled to
a Civil Service Board hearing, except as provided below.

A promoted probationer who has been dismissed or suspended shall be entitled to
a hearing for their dismissal or suspension if they have completed a probationary
period in another class and has had continuous City employment since that time.
The appeal of a dismissed, promoted probationer shall be for reinstatement to the
lower class from which they were promoted.

An employee who has not completed probation in any class shall be entitled to a
hearing if they completed twelve months of continuous full-time regular service in no
more than two classifications and has not been demoted. This hearing entitlement
only applies to dismissals and suspensions. The appeal of a dismissal shall be for
reinstatement to the class from which they were promoted. If reinstated, the
employee must serve a new probationary period in the original classification.

The establishment of Civil Service Board hearing rights is not intended to shorten
the probationary period the employee must serve in the new classification.



Time spent in a trainee/apprenticeship or intern classification shall not be counted
toward completion of probation or establishment of hearing rights as specified in this
Rule. Nothing in this Rule is intended to change the twelve-month probationary
period for the Police and Fire Departments.

An employee promoted from a trainee, apprenticeship, or intern classification shall
not be entitled to a hearing to return to the trainee, apprenticeship, or intern
classification.

A classified employee who has been given an interim appointment and who has
completed the probationary requirements specified in these rules shall be entitled to
a hearing. This hearing entitlement only applies to dismissals and suspensions. The
appeal of a dismissal shall be for reinstatement to the classification held by the
employee in the classified service prior to the interim appointment. Removal from an
interim appointment shall not be deemed a demotion and shall not entitle the
employee to a hearing. An employee removed from an interim appointment shall be
returned to the classification held by the employee immediately prior to the interim
appointment.

10c. Confirmation of Probationer to Regular Status
A performance rating report of satisfactory, made by the rating authority to the
Human Resources Director, shall confirm the probationer to regular civil service
status on completion of the probationary period in a regular position. THE PROCESS
FOR EXECUTIVES AND MIDDLE MANAGERS MUST CONFORM TO THE CITY
MANAGER’S MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND GOAL-SETTING PROCESS.




RULE 11

PERFORMANCE RATING

11a. Performance Rating System
11a1. Who is Rated: Performance ratings shall be made for all full- time employees in
the service of the City and each employee rated shall be given a copy of the rating.

11a2. Purpose: The purpose of the performance rating system is to properly evaluate the
performance of employees of the City in the accomplishment of their assigned
duties and responsibilities. In evaluating an employee's performance, it is
necessary to take into consideration only factors which have a direct relationship
to the accomplishment of work assignments. These factors used in rating
performances should be as objective as possible. The performance rating system
shall be used as a tool of management to improve the performance level of all
employees, particularly of those who measure below satisfactory.

11a3. Administration: The administering of the performance rating system required by
this Rule shall be the responsibility of the Human Resources Director. A detailed
manual of instruction shall be prepared by the Human Resources Director.

11b. Performance Rating System Procedures
11b1. Report Forms: All performance ratings of employees shall be made upon report
forms adopted by the Human Resources Director. The forms shall be filled out by
rating authorities, as defined herein, in accordance with these Rules and the
performance manual.

11b2. Rating Authority: The rating authority shall be that person or committee of persons
who directly supervises the work of the employee rated. The rating authority shall
be determined by the department head.

11b3. Reviewing Authority: The reviewing authority shall be the department head, but the
function of reviewing may be delegated to any division head or other supervisor by
direction. When a department head is the rating authority and when an employee
in that case disagrees with the rating received, the next higher authority shall
review such rating. In no case shall the reviewing and rating authorities be one and
the same person.

11b4. Rating Periods: Each department head shall ensure that an annual performance
rating is prepared for all regular employees under the department's jurisdiction.

11b5. Probationary Employee Performance Rating: A performance rating is required for
all probationary employees at three months, six months, and final from the date
the probationary employee starts work in that class as a probationary employee.
Management has the ability to use unscheduled reviews as appropriate.
Probationary employee ratings shall be completed pursuant to the provisions of

this Rule and in addition, any overall rating of less than "meets job requirements"
must be specifically explained in writing. All probationary employee overall ratings
of less than "meets job requirements" shall be reviewed and approved by the
department head. The department head may delegate this duty to another
administrator, but in no event shall that administrator be at a level below division
head. The person reviewing and approving the overall rating of less than "meets
job requirements" cannot be the same person who issued that rating. THE
PROCESS FOR EXECUTIVES AND MIDDLE MANAGERS MUST CONFORM
TO THE CITY MANAGER’S MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND GOAL-SETTING
PROCESS.

11b6. Factors for Rating Performance: The factors to be considered in the performance
rating system shall be the factors and requirements included in the job of the
employee being rated. Detailed information on job factors and requirements are
given in the performance management guidelines.

11b7. Rating: The rating shall be based on the rating authority's assessment of work
performance, taking into consideration the factors which are related to the ratee's
class of work.

11b8. Appeal: An employee may appeal any unsatisfactory rating through the chain of
command. The decision of the department head, or designee, shall be final on
such appeals. When a department head is the rating authority, the next higher
authority shall hear the appeal and make the final decision.




RULE 15

LEAVES OF ABSENCE

Nothing in this Rule shall be interpreted or applied in a manner that conflicts with federal,
state, or local leave laws or regulations. If any part or provision of this Rule is in conflict or
inconsistent with such applicable provisions of federal, state, or local leave laws or
regulations, or is otherwise held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such part or provisions shall be suspended and superseded by such
applicable law or regulations, and the remainder of the Rule shall remain in effect.

15a. Requesting Leaves of Absence
15a1. All requests for leaves of absence with or without pay shall be made to the
department head concerned for approval on forms approved by the Human
Resources Director. All requests shall be submitted in advance of the beginning
date of the leave (except requests for unanticipated sick leave which shall be
submitted for approval at the earliest possible time) and the duration and kind
of leaves shall be recorded on the payroll. Paid leaves of absence are subject
to available leave credits and the scheduling of vacations is subject to the
control of the department head. All requests for leaves of absence (excluding
industrial leaves) without pay of more than thirty working days shall be subject
to the control of the department heads concerned and shall require the approval
of the appointing authority and the Human Resources Director.

The Human Resources Director shall administer the leave program.

15a2. Job Sharing Program: An employee in a job sharing position shall receive a pro-
rata share of full-time leave credits in a manner determined by the Human
Resources Director.

15a3. All leaves of absence for personal illness of the employee; for the birth,
adoption, or foster placement of a child; or for the care of a AN EMPLOYEE’S
spouse, child, or parent of the employee when those family members have
WITH a serious health condition shall be integrated with the leave requirements
of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993.

15a4. All leaves of absence qualifying for the use of Earned Paid Sick Time under
Arizona law shall be integrated with the leave requirements of Arizona Revised
Statutes (A.R.S.) Title 23, Article 8.1.

15a5 Salaried (exempt) employees shall not receive deductions from their
compensation for absences from work of less than one full work day, except as
permitted under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family Medical Leave Act,
or the Americans with Disabilities Act. If a salaried employee is absent for less
than one-half of a work day, leave balances will not be reduced except as
permitted under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family Medical Leave Act,
or the Americans with Disabilities Act. If the employee is absent for one-half of
a work day or more, a full day of leave will be deducted.



15b. Vacation Leave With Pay
15b1. Eligibility and Vacation Allowances: Every full-time hourly employee who works
a schedule at full-time 52 weeks of the year shall be credited with vacation
credits for every completed calendar month of paid service according to the
following schedule:

8 hours per month Through 5 years of service
10 hours per month beginning 6th through 10th year of service
11 hours per month beginning 11th through 15th year of service
13 hours per month beginning 16th through 20th year of service
15 hours per month beginning 21st year of service & thereafter

Salaried employees shall receive the following annual vacation accruals,
prorated monthly based on an eight-hour day:

12 days Through 5 years of service
15 days 6th through 10th year of service
16.5 days 11th through 15th year of service
19.5 days 16th through 20th year of service
22.5 days 21st year of service and thereafter

An employee in the City of Phoenix Employees’ Retirement Plan who is
receiving pension benefits as a result of retirement from the City under the
Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System shall be considered as a
new employee in determining vacation credits.

Any absence without pay in excess of ten working days in any two consecutive
pay periods shall not be allowed as creditable service for vacation benefits AN
EMPLOYEE IN A FULL-TIME PAYROLL ACTIVE STATUS MAY BE ELIGIBLE
FOR VACATION LEAVE ACCRUALS IN THE PAY PERIOD IN WHICH
ACCRUALS ARE EFFECTIVE.

Leaves of absence compensated under the City of Phoenix Industrial Leave
Program in excess of one year (2,080 hours, or 2,912 hours for 56-hour Fire
employees) per injury or illness shall not be considered as paid service. While
return to working status shall reinstate leave accrual, additional industrial leave
for the same injury or illness shall not be considered paid service. Full-time
regular employees who have been absent from work in an inactive status for
more than two years shall have their rate of vacation accrual adjusted to reflect
the duration of the absence.

15b2. Accrual of Vacation Credits: Vacation credits shall not be allowed to
accumulate in excess of an amount equal to two times the employee's current
annual rate at the end of any calendar year, except on the recommendation of
the employee's department head and approval of the appointing authority or as
established in the applicable Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement.
Approved excess vacation carryover shall be subject to the provisions and
limitations imposed by the City Manager or applicable Memorandum of
Understanding/Agreement. The City Manager may establish limits beyond
which the employee shall not accumulate further leave credits and for which


the employee shall not be compensated.

The written authority to carry over vacation credits in excess of an amount
equal to two times the employee's current annual accrual rate shall be placed
on file in the Human Resources Department. Any unauthorized carryover of
vacation credit in excess of an amount equal to two times the employee's
current annual accrual rate or established amount in the applicable
Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement becomes void at the end of the
calendar year into which such excess credits are extended. Fire Department
employees on a 56-hour schedule shall be allowed a carryover proportional to
the amount allowed FOR general service employees.

15b3. Vacation Rate of Pay and Assessment: The department head is responsible
for the scheduling of vacations for employees regularly each year. Vacation is
charged against the employee's credits in the amount equal to the number of
regularly-scheduled working hours that the employee is on vacation leave. The
full-time employee shall receive the same amount in vacation pay that they
would receive if the employee worked their normal daily work schedule.
Vacation leave in an amount of less than a day for a full-time hourly employee
shall be charged to the nearest fifteen minutes involved in the leave.

Vacation leave for salaried employees shall be charged as stipulated in Rule
15a5.

For operational needs, an employee may be allowed or required by the
department head to forego part or all of their annual vacation. No employee
shall be required to forego the use of vacation credits without the department
head approving the carryover of credits in excess of an amount equal to two times
the employee's current annual accrual rate.

15b4. Termination Pay of Vacation Credits: Every employee who has vacation credits
that do not exceed the limitations established by the City Manager or applicable
Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement shall have such credits paid at the
time of leaving the City's SEPARATION FROM CITY employment, whether by
resignation, retirement, layoff, dismissal, or death. No such payment shall be
made unless the employee has completed six months of employment and no
payment shall be made for hours in excess of limitations established by the City
Manager.

15c. Sick Leave With Pay
15c1. Entitlement and Allowance:

A. Every full-time hourly employee who works a schedule at full-time, 52 weeks
of the year, shall accrue sick leave credits at the rate of 10 hours for each
month of paid service. Salaried employees shall accrue sick leave credits
at the rate of a day and one-quarter for each month of paid service. A
portion of these accruals, not to exceed 40 hours per year, will be
designated for use as Earned Paid Sick Time in accordance with state law
(A.R.S. Title 23, Article 8.1). See Rule 15d.



B. Sick leave is designated in two different ways: Earned Paid Sick Time and
Sick Leave with Pay. Earned Paid Sick Time shall be used in accordance
with state law (A.R.S. Title 23, Article 8.1). See Rule 15d and Administrative
Regulations 2.30(A) and 2.30(B). Sick Leave with Pay shall be used
pursuant to City policy. See Rules 15c2-15c6 and Administrative
Regulations 2.30(A) and 2.30(B). When requesting sick time, employees
shall choose which type of sick leave they want to use as specified by
Administrative Regulation.

C. Leaves of absence compensated under the City of Phoenix Industrial Leave
Program in excess of one year (2,080 hours, or 2,912 hours for 56- hour
Fire employees) per injury shall not be considered as paid service. Sick
leave credits shall accrue without limitation. Any absence without pay of
more than ten working days in any two consecutive pay periods shall not be
allowed as creditable sick leave time AN EMPLOYEE IN A FULL-TIME
ACTIVE STATUS MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR SICK LEAVE ACCRUALS IN
THE PAY PERIOD IN WHICH ACCRUALS ARE EFFECTIVE. Upon
reemployment within five years, 20% of sick leave credits at the time of
termination shall be reinstated to the employee and be available for use
after one month of reemployment. However, employees rehired from a
layoff eligibility list shall have full sick leave credits and use of sick leave
accumulated during previous employment. An employee who is receiving
pension benefits as a result of retirement from the City under the Public
Safety Retirement System and who received cash payment for
accumulated sick leave at time of retirement shall not be entitled to the 20%
return of sick leave credits.

15c2. Qualifications for Sick Leave

Sick leave shall only be allowed when:

A. Personal Incapacity, Preventative Care, or Treatment. The employee is too
ill or injured to be able to work safely.

Employees may also be allowed to use sick leave for examinations by a
licensed physician HEALTH CARE PROVIDER or dentist, or medical
treatments prescribed by a licensed physician HEALTH CARE PROVIDER
or dentist, when it is not possible to arrange appointments on off-duty hours.

Employees may be allowed sick leave to provide the supplemental pay
differential between industrial pay and regular net take-home pay under the
provisions of Rule 15g1, after the one-year supplemental pay has been
exhausted.

B. Care for Family Member. The employee needs to assist with care of a family
member who is ill, injured, or requires treatment.

“Family Member” means:

1. Regardless of age, a biological, adopted or foster child, stepchild or legal


ward, a child of a domestic partner, a child to whom the employee stands
in loco parentis, or an individual to whom the employee stood in loco
parentis when the individual was a minor; or

2. A biological, foster, stepparent or adoptive parent or legal guardian of
an employee or an employee’s spouse or domestic partner or a person
who stood in loco parentis when the employee or employee’s spouse or
domestic partner was a minor child; or

3. A person to whom the employee is legally married under the laws of any
state, or a domestic partner of an employee as registered under the laws
of any state or political subdivision; or

4. A grandparent, grandchild or sibling (whether of a biological, foster,
adoptive or step relationship) of the employee.

C. A police officer who has no other accumulated paid leave may use up to ten
hours of accumulated sick leave per year for non-emergency home care or
medical treatment of a member of the employee's immediate family, subject
to operational and scheduling factors.

D. Parental Leave. The employee qualifies for leave for the birth, adoption or
placement of a child under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). The
employee may use vacation or sick leave for any qualified FMLA
absence if the employee’s paid parental leave benefit is exhausted.
Refer to the paid parental leave provisions under rule 15J (effective
October 1, 2022).

E. Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). the THE employee may use
vacation or sick leave for any qualified FMLA absence.

F. Other Appropriate Circumstances. The City Manager or designee
determines that other reasons of a similar nature exist to warrant the use of
sick leave. The use of sick leave in these circumstances shall be issued by
Administrative Regulation.

15c3. Rate of Sick Leave Pay and Assessment: A full-time hourly employee while on
sick leave shall be charged sick leave credits in the amount equal to the number
of working hours the employee is absent. The rate of pay while on sick leave
shall be the rate at which the employee is being paid when taking leave. Sick
leave for salaried employees shall be charged as stipulated in Rule 15a5. In no
event shall THE FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE BE ALLOWED more than the
regularly-scheduled daily work hours be allowed the full-time employee for
each of the scheduled work days on which the employee is absent. Sick leave
of less than a full day shall be charged to the full-time employee's sick leave
credits to the nearest fifteen minutes involved in the leave. If AN EMPLOYEE
TAKES sick leave occurs on an authorized holiday, and the employee was
scheduled to work on that holiday, sick leave shall not be charged and the
employee shall receive the appropriate holiday compensation as provided in
City Administrative Regulations.


15c4. Leave Authorization: Except for Earned Paid Sick Time in 15d, requests for sick
leave shall include the reason for the leave and shall be submitted for approval
to the supervisor who is authorized by the department head to approve sick
leave. The department head may require a certificate of incapacity from the
employee's medical provider for an absence of over three days. Such
certification may be required for absences of less than three days when the
employee's sick leave record indicates excessive one- or two-day absences.

An BEFORE AN employee, before returning RETURNS to duty from an illness
of more than twelve working days, THE EMPLOYEE may be required to submit
a statement from their medical provider qualifying them for their class of work.

15c5. Fit for Duty Examinations: Whenever, in the opinion of the department head,
the work record or the attendance record, or both, of an employee indicates
concerns regarding the employees fitness for duty due to a health condition,
the department head must consult with Human Resources for approval and
referral to have the employee examined by the City’s contracted medical
provider.

Supervisors in consultation with Human Resources shall immediately inform the
department head of any undue lowering of the quality of work of any employee
or any undue absences which may be a result of the employee's physical
condition.

The medical findings of each examination shall be transmitted to the employee
and their physician when, in the opinion of the City’s contracted medical
provider, corrective treatment steps should be taken. The medical findings of
the City’s contracted medical provider shall be made available to the
employee's family physician upon request of the employee or their physician.

When the medical findings disclose a disability that limits the employee's ability
to perform the essential functions of the job, the department shall investigate
the reasonable accommodations that may be made to assist the employee.

When, in the opinion of the City’s contracted medical provider, a leave of
absence is necessary for treatment, the employee shall be entitled to such sick
leave credits as stand to their account. In the event an employee is found to
need a leave of absence to recover from their health condition and would be
required to take sick leave with or without pay, the employee shall have the
right to obtain a second opinion with a provider of their choosing. If the second
opinion differs from the original findings, the City will schedule a third and final
examination with another medical provider. The majority opinion of the three in
writing shall be binding upon the employee to take or not to take a leave of
absence with or without pay. The cost of the consulting physician shall be in
accordance with the provisions of the preceding section as to this cost
responsibility.

15d. Earned Paid Sick Time
15d1. Entitlement: Employees shall accrue a minimum of one hour of earned paid sick


time for every 30 hours worked, but employees shall not be entitled to accrue
or use more than 40 hours of Earned Paid Sick Time per year.

15d2. Earned Paid Sick Time is different than Sick Leave with Pay. Employees shall
be permitted to use Earned Paid Sick Time in accordance with state law (A.R.S.
title 23, Article 8.1) and as specified by Administrative Regulation. Employees
who choose to use Earned Paid Sick Time should refer to Administrative
Regulations 2.30(A) and 2.30(B).

15e. Military Leave
15e1. National Guard: Leave for National Guard shall, at a minimum, comply with
State law (A.R.S. Section 26-168) and be issued by Administrative Regulation.

15e2. Military Reserve: Leave for Armed Services Reserve shall, at a minimum,
comply with State law (A.R.S. Section 38-610) and be issued by Administrative
Regulation.

15e3. United States Armed Services in Wartime: All employees shall be entitled to an
indefinite leave of absence without pay while serving on active duty in the
military branch of the United States Government during time of war. This leave
allowance also shall cover absences resulting from compulsory military training
orders in peacetime. The position from which an employee is on military leave,
if filled, shall be subject to the return of the employee from military leave.

The employee returning from military leave shall be reinstated to their position
upon their request and presentation of their military termination papers to the
Human Resources Director if they are physically fit to perform the duties of their
former position. If the former position is no longer in existence, the employee
shall be entitled to such employment or reinstatement rights as their seniority
and performance rating entitle them. They shall be allowed ninety days to report
to the department head for duty after the date of discharge or proper release
from the Armed Services.

Employees on military leave of absence will be awarded a merit increase upon
their return in accordance with USERRA.

15f. Special Leave Without Pay
An employee holding a position in the City service may, upon written request, be
granted special leave of absence without pay for any of the following reasons:

15f1. To enable an employee to engage in a course of study such as will increase
their usefulness to the City service;

15f2. To enable an employee to take a position in the unclassified service of the City;

15f3. To enable an employee who is physically or mentally incapacitated to recover
their health;

15f4. To enable employees to attend to their own maternity medical needs, after paid
leave has been exhausted;


15f5. To enable an employee to take up to twelve weeks upon the birth or adoption
of a child or to care for a seriously ill member of the immediate family, as
required by the Family and Medical Leave act ACT;

15f6. Other equally good reasons considered valid by the City Manager.

All requests for leave of absence without pay not in excess of thirty working
days shall require only the approval of the department head concerned. All
other requests for leave of absence (excluding industrial leaves) without pay
FOR more than thirty working days shall be subject to the control of the
department head concerned and shall require the approval of the City Manager
and the Human Resources Director. All leaves requested or granted under the
requirements of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 shall comply with
the guidelines of that Act.

Original requests for special leave of absence without pay shall be for a period
not to exceed one year in duration, except for a classified employee who takes
leave to accept appointment to a position in the unclassified service. A leave to
hold a position in the unclassified service shall terminate when the classified
employee either resigns or is returned to a classified position. Any request for
extension of leave, except as otherwise provided herein, shall be subject to all
the requirements of the original request. The requesting employee shall state
the reasons why the request should be granted, the date when the desired
leave begins, and the probable date of return. Upon the termination of said
leave of absence, such employee shall be returned to the position in the
department from which they obtained leave of absence, if same is in existence,
and the employee has prior rights over one or more persons in the class;
otherwise they shall be transferred to another position or be laid off in
accordance with the rules on transfer, seniority, and performance rating.

If during leave from a position in the classified service, an employee holds a
position in the unclassified service and is dismissed therefrom, such dismissal
shall not abrogate rights to a hearing with respect to their position in the
classified service.

If, in the opinion of the appointing authority, an employee is incapacitated and
unable to work on account of illness, such employee may be required to submit
to a physician designated or approved by the City for examination, but the
employee shall have the right to be represented at such examination by a
physician of their own choice at their own expense. If the report of the physician
shows the employee to be in an unfit condition to perform the assigned duties,
the appointing authority shall have the right to compel such employee to take
sufficient leave of absence to provide the employee an ability to become fit for
duty, assign the employee to light duty, or separate the employee from City
service.

15g. Industrial Leave
15g1. Entitlement: A certified regular full-time employee who works a schedule at full
time fifty-two weeks of the year who is disabled and absent from work as a


result of an industrial injury or occupational disease shall be kept on the City
payroll and be paid an amount equal to but not to exceed the employee’s
regular net take home at the current rate of pay for up to one year total per
injury.

A Police Reserve Officer who is also a certified regular full-time City of Phoenix
employee shall be paid at the same rate as if the employee had been injured
while performing their regular duties as a full-time employee, except that if the
beginning Police Officer salary is higher than the employee's regular rate of
pay, the beginning Police Officer pay shall be used for determining net take-
home pay for up to one year total per injury.

An employee must meet each of the following conditions to qualify for the rate
of pay specified in this section:

A. Be under the jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission of Arizona and be
receiving workers WORKERS’ compensation for time lost due to an
industrial injury received while employed by the City of Phoenix.

B. Meet the specific requirements of the state of Arizona workers WORKERS’
compensation law LAWS.

C. Meet the requirements contained in negotiated Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU).

If a decision on compensability of a claim is pending with the Third-Party
Administrator CITY’S THIRD-PARTY ADMINISTRATOR or Industrial
Commission, and it is determined by the Human Resources Director
DETERMINES that the injury or disease falls within the definition of an
industrial injury or occupational disease, the rate of pay specified above
shall be granted.

An individual who separates from City employment or from Reserve Officer
status shall only be entitled to the compensation required under Arizona
workers WORKERS’ compensation law LAWS.

15g2. Definitions:
A. "Industrial Leave" is defined as absence from work as the result of:

1. An injury by accident arising out of and in the course of City employment
as defined by the Workers Compensation Laws WORKERS’
COMPENSATION LAWS of the State of Arizona.

2. Those occupational diseases arising out of and in the course of City
employment as defined by the Occupational Disease Laws
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE LAWS of the State of Arizona.

B. "Net Take-Home Pay" is defined as the biweekly base rate of pay for a full-time
employee, less deductions for federal and state income tax, social security tax,
and pension plan contributions. It does not include earnings for bonus pay,


overtime differential, stand-by pay, or any other pay that is normally not a
constant condition of work for the class. In no event shall "net take-home pay"
be less than the amount the employee or Police Reserve Officer is entitled to
RECEIVE under the State Workers Compensation Laws WORKERS’
COMPENSATION LAWS.

15g3. Conditions: The employee must meet the following conditions to qualify for
industrial leave:

A. An employee or Police Reserve Officer who refuses to make an election of A
remedy pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute SECTION 23-1023 in THE event
of injury or who rejects the conditions of Workers Compensation Laws
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION LAWS of the State of Arizona prior to an
industrial injury or illness shall not be entitled to Industrial Leave.

B. If the employee or Police Reserve Officer elects to sue a third party defendant
involved in the accident, and proceeds against such other person, the City of
Phoenix shall have a lien on the amount actually collectible from such other
person to the extent of the monies paid by the City of Phoenix.

The amount actually collectible shall be total recovery less the reasonable
necessary expenses including attorney ATTORNEYS’ fees actually expended in
securing such recovery.

15h. Bereavement Leave:
A full-time employee may be allowed paid leave time for the purpose of attending to
family needs that arise in connection with the death of a member of the employee's
immediate family.

"Member of the employee's immediate family" means the mother, father, or
stepparent of the employee; spouse, child, stepchild, brother, sister, step- brother,
or step-sister of the employee; grandparent or grandchild of the employee; the
mother and father of the employee’s spouse; domestic partner of the employee;
children or parent of the domestic partner; and person residing in the employee’s
household as a member of the family. A relative who, because of family
circumstances, has been a parent substitute to the employee, may be considered
as a substitute for mother or father in this definition.

The duration of the paid bereavement leave shall not exceed three working days.
Additional air travel time shall be allowed when the burial occurs out of state and the
employee travels to that location.

15i. Work Assignments for Short-Term, Unscheduled Emergency Situations:

In the event of a short-term, unscheduled emergency, including closure of a City
facility, the City Manager, or designee, may assign full-time employees to a home
assignment or an alternate work location. The home assignment will not replace
approved leave that may fall within the same period.

15j. Paid Parental Leave


15j1. Eligibility and Entitlement:

Effective October 1, 2022, an employee may be allowed up to 480 hours
of city CITY-paid leave upon the birth, adoption, or foster care placement
of a child. To be eligible for paid parental leave, an employee must meet
the family and medical leave act (FMLA) eligibility requirements. An
employee must have been employed by the City for at least 12 months
and have performed at least 1,250 hours of work during the 12-month
period immediately preceding the commencement of the leave. Paid
parental leave will run concurrently with an employee’s FMLA entitlement.
Employees who have exhausted their FMLA entitlement for reasons other
than the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of a child may be
allowed up to 480 hours of paid parental leave. Paid parental leave does
not extend FMLA leave protections and entitlement hours. When both
parents are City employees, each employee may be allowed up to 480
hours of paid parental leave. A maximum of 480 hours of paid parental
leave is available only once during a consecutive 12-month period. The
12-month period begins upon the date of the birth, adoption, or foster
care placement of a child.

15j2. Usage:

Eligible employees may use up to 480 hours of paid parental leave during
the 12-month period beginning on the date of the birth, adoption, or foster
care placement of a child. Paid parental leave must be scheduled in
advance and be taken continuously or in increments of at least one full
day at a time. Paid parental leave will be substituted for other leave types
for up to 480 hours during the 12-month period beginning on the date of
the birth, adoption, or foster care placement of a child.




RULE 21

DISCIPLINE

21a. Notice of Discipline:
The appointing authority shall sign an order in writing which shall constitute the
notice of discipline, and shall also state in the notice the specific charges which shall
be set forth clearly and with such particularity as will enable the employee to
understand the charges and to answer them. Such order shall be personally served
on the employee forthwith or mailed by certified mail to the employee’s most recent
reported address. Return receipt from addressee shall be retained by the serving
department head and a copy of the notice shall be filed with the Civil Service Board.
An employee with WHO HAS COMPLETED probationary requirements completed
may have the hearing benefits provided in Rule 22.

21b. Reasons for Discipline:
The tenure of every employee in the classified service shall be during acceptable
conduct and satisfactory performance of duties. Failure to meet such standards of
conduct and work performance for any of the following listed reasons, such list not
to be considered all-inclusive, shall be considered sufficient by the Board to uphold
the action of the appointing authority in disciplining an employee.

21b1. That the THE employee is WAS incompetent or inefficient in the performance
of their AN ASSIGNED DUTY OR duties.

21b2. That the THE employee has been WAS abusive or threatening in attitude,
language, or conduct towards fellow employees, CITY customers of the City, or
the public.

21b3. That the THE employee has violated any lawful or official regulation or order,
or failed to obey any A SUPERVISOR’S lawful and reasonable direction given
by the supervisor, when such violation or failure to obey amounts to
insubordination or serious breach of discipline which may reasonably be
expected to result in lower morale in the organization, or to result in loss,
inconvenience, or injury to the City or the public.

21b4. That the THE employee has solicited or taken TOOK for personal use a fee, gift
or favor in the course of the assigned work or in connection with it, which would
lead toward THE EMPLOYEE’S ASSIGNED WORK, REFLECTING favoritism
or, the appearance of favoritism, or a conflict or OF interest.

21b5. That the THE employee is in possession of POSSESSED a deadly weapon (as
defined in ARS A.R.S. SECTION 13-3101), excepting a pocket knife (as
provided in ARS A.R.S. SECTION 13- 3102) at a City worksite1, unless such
employee is a police officer.
1 (A worksite includes not only City buildings and property, but also City
vehicles and private vehicles while being used on City business, and
other assigned work locations.)



21b6. That the THE employee is in possession of POSSESSED an alcoholic
beverage, MARIJUANA, or an illegal drug while on duty at a worksite.1 An
exception is allowed for an alcoholic beverage in a sealed container that is a
gift to be given or has been received at the worksite.
1 (A worksite includes not only City buildings and property, but also City
vehicles and private vehicles while being used on City business, and
other assigned work locations.)

21b7. That the THE employee, through negligence or willful conduct, has caused
damage to public property or waste of public supplies or work time.

21b8. That the THE employee has been VIOLATED THE CITY’S ATTENDANCE
POLICY, WAS absent without leave, contrary to these Rules, or has
AUTHORIZED BY THESE RULES, failed to report TO WORK after ANY
APPROVED leave of absence has expired, or FAILED TO REPORT TO WORK
after such ANY leave of absence has been WAS disapproved or revoked and
cancelled by the appointing authority.

21b9. That the THE employee has participated in prohibited political activities as
outlined in applicable City of Phoenix Administrative Regulations.

21b10. That the THE employee has participated in a strike against the City of Phoenix
as that term is defined in SECTION 2-220(17), Code of the City of Phoenix.
("Strike" means the failure by concerted action with others to report for duty,
the concerted absence of employees from their positions, the concerted
stoppage of work, mass picketing, or the concerted abstinence in whole or in
part by any group of employees from the full, faithful, and proper performance
of the duties of employment with a public employer, or the concerted
engagement in a work action for the purpose of inducing, influencing, or
coercing a change in wages, hours, or working conditions, or terms of
employment.)

21b11. That the THE employee has some A permanent or chronic physical or medical
ailment CONDITION or illness which incapacitates PREVENTS them for the
performance of FROM PERFORMING the essential functions of the position
AND after accommodations and/OR placement efforts stipulated in City
Administrative Regulations have been pursued EXHAUSTED.

21b12. That the THE employee has intentionally falsified records or documents made,
kept, or maintained for or on behalf of the City of Phoenix.

21b13. That the THE employee has stolen STOLE or is in unauthorized possession of
City property or the property of another employee or citizen.

21b14. That the THE employee is WAS under the influence of alcohol, MARIJUANA,
or illegal drugs on the job.

21b15. That after investigation, the THE employee has violated City of Phoenix anti-
harassment or anti, NON-discrimination, OR NON-RETALIATION policies.


21b16. That the THE employee has failed to cooperate in an administrative
investigation by refusing to attend scheduled meetings, refusing to answer
questions to the best of their knowledge, or willful obstruction WILLFULLY
OBSTRUCTING of the investigation.

21b17. That the THE employee has retaliated against another employee for exercising
their rights to participate in or appear as a witness at a Civil Service Board
hearing OR MEETING.

21b18. That the THE employee has violated the City’s Ethics Policy, including failure
to provide complete, accurate, and truthful information.

21b19. That after investigation, it IT is reasonable to conclude the employee’s actions
brought discredit or embarrassment to the City.

21b20. That the THE employee’s actions meet the elements of a felony.

21b21. That the THE employee has been guilty of COMMITTED any other conduct
MISCONDUCT of equal gravity to the reasons enumerated in 21b1 through
21b20.







Report

Amendments to the City's Combined Classification and Pay Ordinance (S-51144)
- In Accordance with the Recommendations of Human Resources Committee 637
(Ordinance S-52351) - Citywide

Regrade the classification of Maintenance/Planner Scheduler, Job Code: 50440,
Salary Plan: 004, Grade/Range: 252 ($41,642 - $90,917/annual), Labor Unit Code:
002, Benefit Category: 002, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Non-exempt
to Grade/Range: 256 ($45,926 - $100,235/annual) effective on October 27, 2025.

Regrade the classification of Welder, Job Code: 74400, Salary Plan: 002,
Grade/Range: 149 ($38,688 - $84,469/annual), Labor Unit Code: 001, Benefit
Category: 001, EEO-4 Category: Skilled Craft, FLSA Status: Non-exempt to
Grade/Range: 155 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual) effective on October 27, 2025.

Regrade the assignment to the classification of Welder*U2, Job Code: 74401, Salary
Plan: 004, Grade/Range: 249 ($38,688 - $84,469/annual), Labor Unit Code: 002,
Benefit Category: 002, EEO-4 Category: Skilled Craft, FLSA Status: Non-exempt to
Grade/Range: 255 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual) effective on October 27, 2025.

Retitle the classification of Neighborhood Preservation Inspector I, Job Code: 60670,
Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 353 ($42,661 - $93,122/annual), Labor Unit Code:
003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Non-exempt
to Neighborhood Preservation Inspector effective on October 27, 2025.

Establish the assignment to the classification of Neighborhood Preservation
Inspector*Lead, Job Code: 60671, Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 355 ($44,803 -
$97,781/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category:
Technicians, FLSA Status: Non-exempt effective on October 27, 2025.

Retitle the classification of Neighborhood Preservation Inspector II, Job Code: 60680,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 059 ($49,379 - $107,806/annual), Labor Unit Code:
007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Technicians, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Neighborhood Preservation Supervisor effective on October 27, 2025.

Retitle the classification of Compliance Supervisor, Job Code: 18550, Salary Plan:



001, Grade/Range: 069 ($63,045 - $137,592/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt to Compliance
Manager effective on October 27, 2025.

Regrade the classification of O&M Technician, Job Code: 50370, Salary Plan: 004,
Grade/Range: 245 ($35,110 - $76,627/annual), Labor Unit Code: 002, Benefit
Category: 002, EEO-4 Category: Service Maintenance, FLSA Status: Non-exempt to
Grade/Range: 246 ($35,984 - $78,541/annual) effective on October 27, 2025.

Regrade the assignment of the classification of O&M Technician*SCBA, Job Code:
50371, Salary Plan: 004, Grade/Range: 246 ($35,984 - $78,541/annual), Labor Unit
Code: 002, Benefit Category: 002, EEO-4 Category: Service Maintenance, FLSA
Status: Non-exempt to Grade/Range: 248 ($37,773 - $82,451/annual) effective on
October 27, 2025.

Regrade the classification of Fuel System Support Technician, Job Code: 73420,
Salary Plan: 004, Grade/Range: 239 ($31,845 - $66,186/annual), Labor Unit Code:
002, Benefit Category: 002, EEO-4 Category: Service Maintenance, FLSA Status: Non
-exempt to Grade/Range: 245 ($35,110 - $76,627/annual) effective on October 27,
2025.

Regrade the classification of Deputy City Manager (NC), Job Code: 06080, Salary
Plan: 018, Grade/Range: 930 ($217,485 - $304,491/annual), Labor Unit Code: 008,
Benefit Category: 010, EEO-4 Category: Officials and Administrators, FLSA Status:
Exempt to Grade/Range: 933 ($251,771 - $351,755/annual) effective on October 27,
2025.

Modify salary plan for the classification of Assistant City Manager (NC), Job Code:
06100, Salary Plan: 018, Grade/Range: 935 ($260,998 - $365,394/annual), Labor Unit
Code: 008, Benefit Category: 010, EEO-4 Category: Officials and Administrators, FLSA
Status: Exempt to Grade/Range: 935 ($294,572 - $411,553/annual) effective on
October 27, 2025.

Establish the classification of Police Communications Trainee (NC), Job Code: 01740,
Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 345 ($35,110 - $76,627/annual), Labor Unit Code:
003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status:
Non-exempt effective on November 10, 2025.

Regrade the classification of Police Communications Operator, Job Code: 01830,
Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 345 ($35,110 - $76,627/annual), Labor Unit Code:
003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status:


Non-exempt to Grade/Range: 347 ($36,858 - $80,454/annual) effective on November
10, 2025.

Regrade the assignment of the classification of Police Communications
Operator*Radio/911, Job Code: 01832, Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 347 ($36,858
- $80,454/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category:
Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Non-exempt to Grade/Range: 349 ($38,688 -
$84,469/annual) effective on November 10, 2025.

Establish the assignment of the classification of Police Communications Operator
Radio/911*Trainer, Job Code: 01834, Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 -
$88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category:
Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Non-exempt effective on November 10, 2025.

Regrade the assignment of the classification of Police Communications Operator*Lead
Radio/911, Job Code: 01833, Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 349 ($38,688 -
$84,469/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category:
Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Non-exempt to Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 -
$88,691/annual) effective on November 10, 2025.

Regrade the classification of Fire Emergency Dispatcher, Job Code: 01820, Salary
Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 347 ($36,858 - $80,454/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003,
Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA Status: Non-
exempt to Grade/Range: 349 ($38,688 - $84,469/annual) effective on November 10,
2025.

Regrade the assignment to the classification of Fire Emergency Dispatcher*Lead, Job
Code: 01822, Salary Plan: 006, Grade/Range: 349 ($38,688 - $84,469/annual), Labor
Unit Code: 003, Benefit Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Administrative Support, FLSA
Status: Non-exempt to Grade/Range: 351 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual) effective on
November 10, 2025.

Summary
Effective August 7, 2023, the City implemented a systemic overhaul of its
compensation structure. Following this implementation, additional adjustments have
been identified to address and restore internal alignment within specific job families or
career paths. These changes stem from the findings of the Classification and
Compensation study. Staff respectfully requests approval of the adjustments listed
above.




Financial Impact
The estimated initial cost for this action is $344,000.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On September 25, 2025, Human Resources Committee 637 reviewed and
recommended these modifications for approval.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Human
Resources Department.








Report

Document Scanning Services Contract - RFP 22-068-Amendment (Ordinance S-
52330) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to allow
additional expenditures under contracts 158557 and 158558 with ICM Conversions,
Inc. dba ICM Document Solutions and Spectrum Document Scanning, LLC for the
purchase of document scanning services related to the Municipal Court's case
management system replacement project. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not
exceed $600,000.

Summary
The Municipal Court is in the process of replacing its existing case management
system with a new solution. As part of the migration, the Court will be required to have
a digital format of existing physical case files in order to have the images uploaded to
the new system. It is currently estimated that there will be over three million pages that
will require scanning prior to the new system going live. Additionally, it is critical that a
portion of the case files be scanned during the development and testing period for
validating the new system's performance. The document scanning services contracts
158557 and 158558 are able to provide these services, which will include consulting
on the project, developing a job plan, preparing and imaging case files, as well as
indexing imaged data.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2028, with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $600,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contracts will not exceed $757,500. No General Fund dollars will be used. Funds will
be made available in the Phoenix Municipal Court Local Judicial Collection
Enhancement Fund (JCEF) Account. The Phoenix Municipal Court must submit a



funding plan and application to the Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Office of the
Courts to secure approval for the utilization of JCEF pursuant to Arizona Revised
Statutes section 12-113.

Concurrence/Previous Council
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Document Scanning Services, Contracts 158557 and 158558 (Ordinance S-49839)
on June 14, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes, the Municipal Court and
the Finance Department.








Report

Authorization to Apply for Local Judicial Collection Enhancement Fund Grant
Funding to Purchase Computer Hardware (Ordinance S-52350) - Citywide

Request authorization for the Phoenix Municipal Court to apply for grant funding in an
amount not to exceed $15,000 from the Arizona Supreme Court-administered Judicial
Collection Enhancement Fund (JCEF) to purchase computer hardware. Further
request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and for the City Controller to
disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
Phoenix Municipal Court will use these funds to purchase laptops and related
hardware. The purchase of additional hardware will help the Court to support
expanded business needs, ensure the reliability of the Court's business systems, and
minimize potential hardware failure.

Financial Impact
Funds will be made available in the Phoenix Municipal Court's local JCEF account.
The Phoenix Municipal Court must submit a funding plan and application to the
Arizona Supreme Court Administrative Office of the Courts to secure approval for
utilization of JCEF funds pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Section 12-113. No
General Fund dollars will be used.

Responsible Department
The item is recommended by Chief Presiding Judge B. Don Taylor III and Deputy City
Manager Gina Montes.








Report

Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Gaming Grant (Ordinance S-52340)
- Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to apply for
and accept up to $110,000 in new funding from the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian
Community under the 2026 funding cycle. Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse funds as directed by the Salt
River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community in connection with these grants.

Summary
The Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 12 Percent Gaming grant application
process is by invitation only. The tribe selects which municipalities and local non-profits
are invited to apply for funding consideration. An invitation to apply is not guaranteed
that the application will be selected for funding by the Tribe. Salt River Pima-Maricopa
Indian Community does not consider multi-year capital campaign projects.

If awarded, the funds would be applied as directed by Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian
Community toward the following:

Non-Profit Applications
· Gabriel's Angels: $10,000 for Pet Therapy Programs, which includes Paws for
Resilience; Animals, Books and Children; and Community Support Visits. Therapy
teams are volunteers consisting of an owner and pet, most commonly a dog.
Therapy teams must be registered with Pet Partners or Alliance of Therapy Dogs
and clear an FBI fingerprint/background check prior to being assigned to a partner
agency. Gabriel's Angels provides extensive training to its volunteers who will be
working with, and structured activities that will effectively impact the core strengths
needed for, vulnerable children to develop socially. There is no cost to the
participating agency or school to receive therapy visits for their children. All costs to
provide services are supported through community philanthropy.
· Keys to Change: $100,000 for the Street Outreach program, which works with the
unsheltered homeless population in the neighborhoods surrounding the Key
Campus and throughout Maricopa County, using a multidisciplinary approach to
engage, assess, and triage their needs. While the long-term goal of Street Outreach
is to reduce the time a person spends unsheltered, the short-term goal is to provide


individuals with the support and encouragement they need to begin accessing
services from Keys to Change and its partners.

The gaming compact entered into by the State of Arizona and various tribes calls for
12 percent of gaming revenue to be contributed to cities, towns, and counties for
government services that benefit the public, including public safety, mitigation of
impacts of gaming, and promotion of commerce and economic development. The Salt
River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community will notify the City, by resolution of the Tribal
Council, if it desires to convey to the City or nonprofit a portion of its annual 12 percent
local revenue-sharing contribution.

Financial Impact
There is no budgetary impact to the City and no general-purpose funds are required.
Entities that receive gaming grants are responsible for the management of those
funds.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Office of Government
Relations.








Report

Authorization to Apply, Accept, Disburse Funds and Enter into Agreement for
Arizona Department of Water Resources Arizona Water Protection Fund Grant
(Ordinance S-52324) - Districts 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to approve the
Office of Environmental Programs to submit a grant application to the Arizona
Department of Water Resources for the Arizona Water Protection Fund grant, for up to
$350,414. The purpose is to support a Salt River dry weather flow study to inform
riparian restoration and management through the Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Area
and the future Rio Salado Oeste Habitat Restoration project area. If awarded, request
to execute all contracts and Memorandums of Agreement necessary to accept and
disburse the grant funds. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and
the City Controller to disburse, grant funds in accordance with the terms of the
aforementioned grant and agreement. Further request approval to indemnify, defend,
and hold harmless the Arizona Water Protection Fund Commission and the State,
including the Arizona Department of Water Resources, for any claims as a result of
activities by the City or our contractors under this grant.

Summary
The Arizona Water Protection Fund is a state grant program focused on funding efforts
to maintain, enhance, and restore river and riparian resources throughout Arizona and
measures to increase water availability and supply. The City of Phoenix is in the
feasibility study stage with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for Rio Salado Oeste, a
potential future riparian restoration project from 19th Avenue to 83rd Avenue in the Salt
River. Rio Salado Oeste would connect two previously constructed ecosystem
restoration projects - Rio Salado Phoenix upstream from 19th Avenue to 28th Street
and Tres Rios downstream from 83rd Avenue to El Mirage Road - resulting in 19
contiguous miles of enhanced river habitat and passive recreation when complete.
Water planning is critical to the success of Rio Salado Oeste and it has become
increasingly important to understand the context, seasonality, and quantity of water
that currently enters the Salt River in the Rio Salado Phoenix and Rio Salado Oeste
reaches of the river during both rainy and dry periods.

The purpose of the study under consideration for the grant is to capture critical data by
continuously monitoring flow entering the river over the course of up to two years from



up to 13 stormwater outfalls in Rio Salado Phoenix and Rio Salado Oeste reaches of
the Salt River. One low flow channel location near 19th Avenue would also be included
for up to 14 total monitoring locations. These outfalls discharge even without rain,
primarily due to Salt River Project (SRP) return flows, but the quantity and frequency is
unknown.

Thirteen of the 14 proposed monitoring locations are on property owned by the City or
for which the City has an easement. The 14th location is on land owned by Arizona
Department of Transportation (ADOT). ADOT has provided a letter of support for this
project and indicated their intent to provide the City with an encroachment permit for
the study if the City is successful in obtaining the grant.

The project would cover up to a two-year period, depending on the funding received
under the grant. An existing contract would be used to hire a firm to order, install, and
monitor the flow meters for the first year and prepare a report on the data. The City
would own the flow meters and City staff would monitor the flow meters in the second
year of the grant and any future years the City chooses to undertake without grant
assistance. The contractor would continue to support the City in the second year and
conduct the data analysis and a final report documenting both years of data at the
grant's conclusion, if full grant funding is received.

The data and reports will inform the ongoing Rio Salado Oeste feasibility study and will
assist the City in developing appropriate strategies for maximizing the use of existing
water inputs to support restored habitat. The data will also support other Phoenix
initiatives, including a stormwater master plan.

Procurement Information
Use of an existing City of Phoenix on-call contractor is anticipated for this study.

Contract Term
The grant is for a period of two and a half years; two years for the study and six
months for final reporting and grant close-out activities.

Financial Impact
The Office of Environmental Programs (OEP) would provide a $30,001 local cash
match for grant funding. This funding would be covered by OEP's existing operating
budget.

Location
The monitoring locations are located along and within the Salt River at discrete
locations from just east of I-10 to 83rd Avenue.


Council District(s): 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Office of
Environmental Programs.








Report

Flat Fee Multiple Listing Services for Single-Family Homes Contract - RFP FY26-
086-01 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52331) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into
contracts with Coleman Business Services, LLC and CRG, Inc. (Capital Realty Group)
dba Listed Simply to provide flat fee listing services for the Housing Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $60,000.

Summary
The contracts will allow the real estate brokers to publish advertisements for residential
properties available through the Housing Department’s Section 32 and Section 18
programs on multiple listing platforms.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Seven vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An
evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria
with a maximum possible point total of 1,000:

Method of Approach (0-350 points)
Qualifications and Experience (0-450 points)
Pricing (0-200 points)

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendors:

· Coleman Business Services, LLC (680 points)
· CRG, Inc. (Capital Realty Group) dba Listed Simply (659 points)

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about November 15, 2025, for a five year term with no
options to extend the term.



Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts’ value will not exceed $60,000. The contracts are funded with
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funds. There is no impact to the
General Fund.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.








Report

Authorization to Amend Contract 158819-0 with MV Transportation, Inc. for
Senior Programs Alternative Transportation Services (Ordinance S-52299) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to amend
Contract 158819-0 with MV Transportation, Inc. and add $4,363,809 in funding for a
new total not to exceed $9,275,960. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. Funds are available in the Human Services
Department's budget.

Summary
MV Transportation provides Alternative Transportation Services for 15 Senior Center
locations. The services include shuttle (taxi) service for senior center members,
transporting them to and from their homes to the closest senior centers, and group
trips for center members. The additional funding will support the increased usage of
the shuttle service and additional group trip activities.

Contract Term
The term of the contract remains unchanged, beginning on July 1, 2023 and ending
June 30, 2028, with no options to extend the term.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $4,363,809 in additional funds, the revised total value of the contract
will not exceed $9,275,960. Funds are available in the Human Services Department's
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On May 31, 2023, City Council approved the Authorization to Enter into Contract for
Alternative Transportation Services Request for Proposals with Ordinance S-49785.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.







Report

Automated Materials Handling System Contract - RFA 25-0045 Request for
Award (Ordinance S-52305) - Districts 3 & 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into a
contract with Envisionware, Inc. to provide automated materials handling systems for
the Burton Barr and Mesquite Libraries. Further request an exception to the indemnity
and assumption of liability provisions of Phoenix City Code section 42-18. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
total value of the contract will not exceed $360,000.

Summary
This contract will continue to provide the Library Department with two existing
automated materials handling (AMH) systems located at the Burton Barr Central
Library and the Mesquite Library. The AMH systems are hardware solutions that
receive library materials from staff and the general public, check the materials into the
Library Department's Integrated Library System (ILS), and sort the incoming materials
into bins based on a configurable set of sorting rules. The AMH systems have
significantly reduced the staff effort previously required to handle, check-in, and sort
materials that had been borrowed from the libraries. This contract will provide for
ongoing annual maintenance for this specialized vendor supported solution and may
optionally provide pricing for professional services, goods, or licensing related to the
AMH systems that the City of Phoenix may purchase at its discretion. These AMH
systems were originally selected in a competitive process (RFP 18-040). These
systems have not reached the end of their useful life and require ongoing
maintenance. Envisionware Inc. is the only authorized partner Lyngsoe uses for
ongoing support.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition. In 2018, the City of Phoenix Finance
Department issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) 18-040 on the Library Department's



behalf for an automated materials handler. At the conclusion of the competitive
process, a five-year contract was awarded to Envisionware, Inc. for a Lyngsoe
Systems AMH at the Burton Barr Central Library.

A replacement AMH for the Mesquite Library was also installed in 2024. Since October
2017, Envisionware, Inc. is the only authorized partner in the United States for
distributing and supporting Lyngsoe's AMH systems.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about October 31, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend the term.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $360,000 for the five-year aggregate
term. Funding is available in the Phoenix Library Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Phoenix
Library Department.








Report

Phoenix Public Library's Annual Application for Arizona State Library's State
Grants-In-Aid Funds (Ordinance S-52332) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to apply for,
accept, and enter into an agreement for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Arizona State
Library's State Grants-in-Aid (SGIA) Grant Funds for the Phoenix Public Library in an
amount of $71,208. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and
for the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
Arizona State Grants-in-Aid are allocated annually to the Library based on a per capita
distribution of funds by the Arizona State Legislature through the Arizona State Library,
Archives and Public Records. The amount allocated for Phoenix Public Library this
year is $71,208.

Funds will be utilized to support early literacy and school-age outreach through the
hiring of a full-time library assistant on the Literacy Outreach Team. Staff will conduct
programs and workshops in schools and community centers and work with City of
Phoenix Housing on community book distribution and early literacy programs in public
housing communities. SGIA funds allow Phoenix Public Library to extend critical early
literacy outreach into the community Citywide. Priority will be given to areas of the City
identified with the most need (based on school district reading scores).

Financial Impact
The amount allocated for Phoenix Public Library this year is $71,208 and no matching
funds are required; there is no impact to the General Fund.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.








Report

Artist Design and Construction Oversight Contract for The 35th Avenue/Grand
Avenue Overpass Public Art Project (Ordinance S-52349) - Districts 4 & 5

Request for the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into a contract,
and amendments as necessary, with Mary Lucking, in an amount not to exceed
$100,000 for design and construction oversight of artwork for the 35th Avenue/Grand
Avenue Overpass Public Art Project. Further request authorization for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-30 Public Art Plan includes funding for the 35th
Avenue/Grand Avenue Overpass Public Art Project as one of its initiatives. In
partnership with the City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department and the Arizona
Department of Transportation (ADOT), the Phoenix Office of Arts and Culture is
commissioning an artist to design artwork for the bridge barriers and/or fences of two
overpasses along Grand Avenue. The bridges will span Indian School Road and 35th
Avenue.

The artist will be responsible for designing artwork that creates both a functional and
visually impactful element within the overall infrastructure. The artwork will act as a
visual gateway to the surrounding communities, marking the entry to the Alhambra and
Maryvale neighborhoods and contributing to the identity of the Grand Avenue corridor.
This project is on a fast-tracked timeline, with completion of the bridge design
anticipated by the end of 2025. The artist will also provide oversight during the
fabrication, installation, and construction of the final artwork design.

The pool of artists for this opportunity included 17 local and national artists/artist teams
who responded to recent Requests for Qualifications of a similar scope and scale
issued in the last FY 2024-25.

The artist selection panel for this project included: Myesha Harris, Street
Transportation Department, Special Projects Administrator; John Hucko, ADOT, Senior
Landscape Architect; and Gina Amato, Arts Professional, Scottsdale Public Art. The
panel reviewed applications over a two-week period and met on September 9, 2025, to
review, discuss, and vote to recommend an artist and an alternate artist. The panel



recommended Mary Lucking as the project artist and Daniel Mayer as the alternate for
this project.

Financial Impaci
The cost associated with this agreement is $100,000. The approved Art Plan includes
Street Transportation Department CIP funds for this project.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Arts and Culture Commission reviewed and approved this item, 11-0, at
its September 16, 2025, meeting.

Location
35th Avenue/Grand Avenue Overpass
Council Districts: 4 and 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
David Mathews, and the Street Transportation and Arts and Culture departments.








Report

Authorize Additional Funding for the Turf Mowing Services Contract - PKS-RFQ-
24-0323- Amendment (Ordinance S-52336) - Districts 1, 2, 3 & 6

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to allow
additional expenditures under Contract 160746 with URW, LLC dba United Right of
Way for turf mowing services for the Parks and Recreation Department. Further
request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The two-year total value of the Contract will not exceed $370,000.

Summary
This contract provides all necessary labor, materials, equipment, and supplies for the
mowing of general turf areas and athletic turf areas at 13 park locations, at the turf
height and frequency per site as specified by the Parks and Recreation Department.
The immediate need for additional funding is required to sustain these essential
services through the end of the contract term which expires on April 30, 2026.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as the result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstance without Competition. The existing turf mowing services contract
with URW, LLC dba United Right of Way was obtained through a Request for Quotes
informal solicitation in March 2024. The determination is needed since the additional
funding will exceed the informal threshold. A new solicitation process will be performed
prior to the termination of the existing contract with URW, LLC dba United Right of
Way.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on April 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $150,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $370,000. Funds are available in the Parks and Recreation


Department's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Turf Mowing Contract 160746 (Ordinance S-50843) on May 15, 2024.

Location
Council Districts: 1, 2, 3, and 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.








Report

Mid-Size Mower Lease, Maintenance and Repair Contract PKS-RFP-26-0050-
Request for Award (Ordinance S-52337) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into a
contract with Simpson Norton Corporation to provide mid-size lawnmowers and
associated maintenance and repair services for the Parks and Recreation Department.
Further, request to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code Section 42-18,
authorizing indemnification or assumption of liability provisions that otherwise would be
prohibited for the agreement. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed
$1.65 million.

Summary
This contract provides the Parks and Recreation Department with 10 leased mid-sized
mowers to increase efficiency and reduce costs by ensuring less equipment downtime
and lower repair costs. The contract includes a service plan to cover maintenance and
repairs.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Two vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An evaluation
committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria, with a
maximum possible point total of 1000:

Delivery & Logistics (0-400 points)
Pricing Proposal (0-300 points)
Qualifications and Experience (0-200 points)
Preventative Maintenance Schedule (0-100 points)

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:

Simpson Norton Corporation - 807 points




Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about October 15, 2025, for a six-year term with no
options to extend the term.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1.65 million.

Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.








Report

Laveen Elementary School District Intergovernmental Agreement for a Shared
Use Parking Lot (Ordinance S-52342) - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to enter into
an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Laveen Elementary School District No.
59 (District) for the use and maintenance of a shared use parking lot. The parking lot is
located at Laveen Heritage Park and adjacent to the Desert Meadows Elementary
School. Further, request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix
City Code § 42-20 to authorize inclusion of provisions in the documents pertaining to
this transaction for indemnification and assumption of liability that otherwise would be
prohibited by Phoenix City Code § 42-18.

Summary
The City’s newly developed Laveen Heritage Park includes a parking lot (Attachment
A) that will serve as a drop off/pick up area for the adjacent Desert Meadows
Elementary School. The District will be allowed to use the parking lot for drop off/pick
up activity at the beginning and end of each school day during the 180-day school
year.

Contract Term
The IGA has a term of 10 years. Provisions of the IGA include an option to renew the
term for an additional 10 years, which may be exercised by written notice sent to the
other party a minimum of 30 calendar days prior to the expiration of the IGA.

Financial Impact
No City funds will be expended to execute or administer this IGA.

The District will be responsible for contributing to the maintenance of the parking lot
proportional to their use.

Location
Laveen Heritage Park is located at 71st Avenue and Meadows Loop Road. The
parking lot is located adjacent to the Desert Meadows Elementary School.
Council District: 7




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.





ATTACHMENT A

PARKING LOT

DROP OFF / PICK UP AREA







Report

Enhanced Municipal Services District Services Contract - Request to Award
(Ordinance S-52338) - Districts 7 & 8

Authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to contract with
Downtown Phoenix, Inc. (DPI) to implement the Downtown Enhanced Municipal
Services District (EMSD) for calendar years 2026-2030.

Summary
On August 29, 1990, at the request of the downtown community, the City Council
authorized the creation of an EMSD to provide greater services within the area
generally bounded by 3rd Avenue and 7th Street, from Fillmore Street to Harrison
Street. These services are funded via an assessment on the properties within the
district boundaries.

The City currently contracts with DPI, a nonprofit corporation, to implement the work
program of the Downtown EMSD. The City previously contracted with Downtown
Phoenix Partnership (DPP) from 1990 until the formation of DPI in 2015. DPI was
formed to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of downtown organizations and the
two organizations merged in 2022, with the surviving entity keeping the DPI name and
branding. DPI has been providing services to the district since 2015, and the
organization’s current contract with the City will expire on December 31, 2025.

On an annual basis, the City Council approves the Downtown EMSD work plan and
budget, as recommended by the EMSD Advisory Board, which includes City
representation. Services funded through an assessment on properties within the
Downtown EMSD include:

· Downtown Ambassadors
· Event support
· Pedestrian way-finding
· Sidewalk sweeping
· Graffiti removal
· Business assistance
· Landscape maintenance




While the City Council authorizes the Downtown EMSD budget each year, the EMSD
priorities, work plans, and budgets are developed with guidance from DPI's volunteer
EMSD Advisory Board. The City's current Downtown EMSD contract specifies that the
EMSD Advisory Board include a cross-section of downtown stakeholders, including
property owners, tenants, merchants, cultural and nonprofit organizations, City and
Maricopa County management, and elected officials. The new Downtown EMSD
contract will include similar requirements for the EMSD Advisory Board as well as
other terms and conditions deemed necessary by City staff.

By contracting with DPI to implement the Downtown EMSD, the City can continue the
positive momentum, streamlined coordination, and communication that DPI has
delivered for the benefit of the City and the downtown community.

Procurement Information
In compliance with Section I, Paragraph 6 of Administrative Regulation 3.10, this
procurement is a Special Circumstance Without Competition Determination. DPI was
specifically created to serve the downtown area and provide these services.

Contract Term
The contract term will be for five years and one month beginning on December 1,
2025, through December 31, 2030. December 2025 is included in the term to ensure
timely payment can be made to DPI for services that begin January 1, 2026.

Financial Impact
Property assessments fund the City's Downtown EMSD contract. City Council
approves the Downtown EMSD budget, property assessments, and the City’s
contribution on an annual basis. Staff requests this City Council action prior to the start
of each Downtown EMSD calendar year, with the 2026 process currently underway.

Location
Council Districts: 7 and 8.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.








Report

2026 Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services District Budget, Assessments and
Public Hearing Date (Resolution 22331) - Districts 7 & 8

Request City Council approval of the 2026 Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services
District (Downtown EMSD) proposed budget, assessments on the Downtown EMSD,
and setting the date of November 5, 2025, for the Public Hearing on the estimated
assessments, pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Section 48-575. The General
Fund estimated annual expenditure for this program is $452,017.

Summary
The City Council authorized the formation of the Downtown EMSD in 1990 to provide
enhanced public services above and beyond the level of services provided in the
remainder of the City. Costs for the Downtown EMSD’s services are paid through
assessments on property owners within the Downtown EMSD boundaries. The City
contracts directly with Downtown Phoenix, Inc. (DPI) to implement the work program,
as described in Attachment A, of the Downtown EMSD. The Downtown EMSD is
generally bounded by Garfield Street, 7th Street, 3rd Avenue, and the railroad tracks
south of Jackson Street.

2026 Downtown EMSD Proposed Budget
The work plan and budget for calendar year (CY) 2026 provide a variety of enhanced
services in the Downtown core, including business improvement services and overall
business development.

In June 2025, the Downtown EMSD Board of Directors, which includes representatives
of the City and other Downtown EMSD property owners, approved the proposed CY
2026 Downtown EMSD budget of $5,240,953. Attachment B includes a breakdown of
the expense categories. Included in the proposed budget is $172,645 for streetscape
maintenance expenses, which are paid only by property owners and tenants adjacent
to the Streetscape Improvement District. The Streetscape Improvement District
includes certain portions of Monroe Street from 3rd Avenue to 7th Street; Adams Street
from 2nd Avenue to 2nd Street; 2nd Street from Jefferson to Van Buren streets; and
3rd Street from Monroe to Van Buren streets.

The proposed CY 2026 Downtown EMSD budget of $5,240,953 represents an



increase of $250,697 over the CY 2025 Downtown EMSD budget. The increase results
from increasing costs of the organization. The CY 2026 assessments for the
Downtown EMSD will be levied after the required Downtown EMSD approval process
has been completed. Assessments are determined in proportion to the benefits
received by each parcel. The proposed assessments and 2026 Downtown EMSD
Diagram are based on the estimate of expenses and property data available as of April
10, 2025.

· Estimated CY 2026 District Budget: $5,240,953.
· Estimated CY 2026 Assessment Revenue: $4,990,953.
· Estimated CY 2026 Non-assessment Revenue: $250,000.

Public Hearing Date
It is requested that the City Council set the date of November 5, 2025, as the date for
the Public Hearing on the 2026 Downtown EMSD assessments.

Financial Impact
The City's total estimated annual expenditure for this program is $1,343,610, which
includes:
· $452,017 from the General Fund (approximate $8,628 increase from 2025).
· $665,747 from the Phoenix Convention Center.
· $159,804 from the Sports Facilities Fund.
· $66,042 from the Phoenix Bioscience Core.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Economic Development and the Arts Subcommittee meeting approved the CY
2026 Downtown EMSD work plan and budget on September 10, 2025, by a vote of 3-
0.

Public Outreach
A public hearing will be held for property owners to discuss the proposed
assessments, costs, and services provided in connection with the Downtown EMSD. If
this request is approved, the public hearing will be set for November 5, 2025, at 2:30
p.m., in the Phoenix City Council Chambers. All property owners are notified by mail of
their annual assessment costs by the Street Transportation and Community and
Economic Development departments no fewer than 20 days prior to the public hearing.
Notice of the public hearing will also be published on October 22, 2025, and October
24, 2025, in the Record Reporter. No further notification is required after the public
hearing.




Location
The Downtown EMSD is generally bounded by Garfield Street, 7th Street, 3rd Avenue,
and the railroad tracks south of Jackson Street.
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
John Chan and the Street Transportation and Community and Economic Development
departments.





Attachment A




a.




a.


b.


c.


d.




Attachment B
CY 2026 EMSD Budget - Estimated


Account 2026 Budget
EMSD General Office 709,560
EMSD Admin Salaries 200,982
EMSD Events 433,358
EMSD Marketing 467,460
EMSD Bus Dev 219,998
EMSD BID/Field Services 2,831,950
EMSD SID 172,645
Total District Expenses 4,990,953
Miscellaneous non-district expenses 250,000
Total Budgeted Expenses 5,240,953
Assessment Revenue 4,990,953
Non-assessment Revenue 250,000
Total Revenues 5,240,953







Report

2026 Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services District Assessment Diagram
(Resolution 22332) - Districts 7 & 8

Request City Council approval of the 2026 Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services
District (EMSD) Assessment Diagram. There is no financial impact as a result of this
request.

Summary
The City Council authorized formation of the Downtown EMSD in 1990 to provide
enhanced municipal services above and beyond the level of services provided in the
remainder of the City. The Downtown EMSD is generally bounded by Garfield Street,
7th Street, 3rd Avenue, and the railroad tracks south of Jackson Street. Costs for the
Downtown EMSD’s services are paid through assessments on property owners within
the Downtown EMSD boundaries.

The proposed 2026 Downtown EMSD Assessment Diagram (Attachment A - 2026
Downtown EMSD Diagram) indicates the properties to be assessed and is on file in
the Office of the Director of the City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department. The
proposed assessments and Calendar Year (CY) 2026 Downtown EMSD Diagram are
based on the estimate of expenses and property data available as of April 10, 2025.
The proposed diagram was completed on August 10, 2025. As required by Arizona
Revised Statutes Section 48-575(D), the CY 2026 Downtown EMSD Diagram shows
each separate lot numbered consecutively, the area in square feet of each lot, and the
area in square feet of any buildings located on each lot.

Public streets, alleys, and property utilized for residential purposes that do not benefit
by the enhanced municipal services are excluded from this proposed CY 2026
Downtown EMSD Diagram. This request for action includes a Resolution approving
the CY 2026 Downtown EMSD Diagram.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact for approving the CY 2026 Downtown EMSD Diagram.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Economic Development and the Arts Subcommittee meeting approved the CY



2026 Downtown EMSD work plan and budget on September 10, 2025, by a vote of 3-
0.

Public Outreach
A public hearing will be held for property owners to discuss the proposed
assessments, costs, and services provided in connection with the Downtown EMSD. If
this request is approved, the public hearing will be set for November 5, 2025, at 2:30
p.m., in the Phoenix City Council Chambers. All property owners are notified by mail of
their annual assessment costs by the Street Transportation and Community and
Economic Development departments no fewer than 20 days prior to the public hearing.
Notice of the public hearing will also be published on October 22, 2025, and October
24, 2025, in the Record Reporter. No further notification is required after the public
hearing.

Location
The Downtown EMSD is generally bounded by Garfield Street, 7th Street, 3rd Avenue,
and the railroad tracks south of Jackson Street.
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
John Chan and the Street Transportation and Community and Economic Development
departments.





Garfield Street
DOWNTOWN PHOENIX ENHANCED




�l ;rc;·1 ■�
MUNICIPAL SERVICES DISTRICT

e
-
� 92 7
LEGEND & SCALE
i
2026 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM � �
�

CD ASSESSMENT# ti)

�fflC.$tllT.r.-r.i:
A11'111)\�)Af ntl:Mll':TllleC:. Tlll:o.'.lffl«:ll.\'.Jt lt«
CllTCll'l'tl!lt:l'IXttll1' U,,,V\'.11 :));$
7 STREETSCAPE
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
o 125 250 375 500
-==--===--Feet A
[!tl
1 INCH= 125 FEET
Pierce Str
This drawing was created for reference and �
planning purposes only and not for construction.
Parcel data from County Assessor as of 4/02/2025.
Assessment data updated as of 8/10/2025. � �


Fillmore Street
Ci)



��
Ill 4i
..
::s Taylor Street
C
Ill

-"' � e G!@ ..
...... � 0@1@
b ------=

®
i-,..oe-T-��
-
�
; ..,,,....,..,.....,:-:--
Polk Street
7�
�1:1m@
"0 �
ti)

c
� $ 9 ti)
.c
(I) L...r--,
@JN
\.e,' 7
� 103
@



�"f:l 6�
..___,_ _,




� '---I _®_I l��e�l
Van Buren Street


l@l
� LJ @® LJ Monroe Street




Washington Street




Jefferson Street

@ -�




-
Jefferson Street
ti)
@)


@
J @


Pa 210
L_:�
e1
2�of
:
g

�-------------------------------------
DOWNTOWN PHOENIX ENHANCED
MUNICIPAL SERVICES DISTRICT
2026 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM DETAIL
Lot Size in County Parcel Building Size in Lot Size in County Parcel Building Size in Lot Size in Building Size in Lot Size in Building Size in
ID # Owner ID # Owner ID # Owner County Parcel # ID # Owner County Parcel #
Square Feet # Square Feet Square Feet # Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet

1 FILLMORE APARTMENTS OWNER LLC 97,222 111 42 139 292,582 202 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 459 1,126 405 KINDEL AARON LAWRENCE 837 112 21 313 837 605 REDA JASON 1,160 112 42 065 1,076
2 Merged into ID 1 203 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 460 1,394 406 SWINDLE TIMOTHY D/KERRY K 837 112 21 314 837 606 ERB JAY PARRY 1,160 112 42 066 1,170
3 ParcelNo
Parcel NoLonger
LongerExists
Exists 204 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 461
Merged into ID 1 1,394 407 ADAIR KRISTIAN ANNE MARIE 858 112 21 315 858 607 BROWN ADRIAN/ANITA 1,042 112 42 067 985
4 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 1 205 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 462 1,126 408 STEVE TOEDTEMEIER 801 112 21 316 801 608 JOEL GREENBERG IRA 5005 1,625 112 42 068 1,426
5 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 1 206 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 11221 463 962 409 RODGERS DESDRIA/GRANT KACH 710 112 21 317 710 609 COOPER DAVID/ELIZABETH 953 112 42 069 900
6 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 1 207 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 11221 464 1,310 410 AFRICA EDWIN S III 1,254 112 21 318 1,200 610 BRANNON CRAIG S/CHRISTINA M 1,085 112 42 070 1,020
7 JOHN E GARRETSON LIVING TRUST/GARRETSON JOHN
E 7,000 111 42 026 Parking Lot 208 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 112 21 465 1,159 411 COX RICHARD 755 112 21 319 755 611 LAMEYER RYAN 1,030 112 42 071 996
8 JOHN E GARRETSON LIVING TRUST/GARRETSON JOHN
E 7,000 111 42 024 Parking Lot 209 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 112 21 466 1,323 412 STEER THEODORE 1,268 112 21 320 1,174 612 SAVOCA MATTHEW J 1,558 112 42 072 1,463
9 333 N. 3RD AVE LLC 7,000 11142 022 Parking Lot 210 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 112 21 467 993 413 RUBIN BRETT 1,148 112 21 321 1,098 613 NAKAMOTO REIFURTH TRUST 1,580 112 42 073 1,412
10 333 N. 3RD AVE LLC 7,000 11142 020 Parking Lot 211 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 468 1,126 414 LITTLE ITALY BALLPARK APARTMENTS LLC 1,432 112 21 322 1,395 614 ESCOBEDO JOSHUA 1,160 112 42 074 1,074
11 333 N. 3RD AVE LLC 7,000 11142 019 Parking Lot 212 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 469 1,394 415 MILLER JEFFREY A 837 112 21 323 837 615 CLARK JACE 1,160 112 42 075 1,076
12 333 N. 3RD AVE LLC 7,000 11142 017 Parking Lot 213 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 470 1,394 416 DILLAVOU CHRISTINA/LIEBERMAN NANCY 837 112 21 324 837 616 ZWEIBACK JACOB E/ADAM/MARSHALL KIMBERLY 1,160 112 42 076 1,170
13 333 N. 3RD AVE LLC 8,138 11142 015 Vacant Lot 214 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 471 1,126 417 METCALF BRIAN 866 112 21 325 858 617 YAMASHITA FRED 1,042 112 42 077 985
14 333 N. 3RD AVE LLC 7,000 11142 011A Vacant Lot 215 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 21 472 962 418 MACKIN SARAH 751 112 21 326 751 618 NZAMU KALEMA/ATOKI ILEKA 1,625 112 42 078 1,426
15 333 N. 3RD AVE LLC 7,000 11142 009 Vacant Lot 216 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 112 21 473 1,310 419 BOWLES JACK A 710 112 21 327 710 619 GANUS ALEXANDRU 953 112 42 079 900
16 ZAYO GROUP LLC 21,000 11142 115 10,864 217 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 112 21 474 1,159 420 GRIFFIN DARNEE 861 112 21 328 861 620 BUSCH SCOTT 1,085 112 42 080 1,020
17 JOHN E GARRETSON LIVING TRUST/ETAL 17,478 11142 005A Parking Lot 218 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 112 21 475 1,323 421 GSC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 960 112 21 329 953 621 LIEBOLD KRISTINA D 1,030 112 42 081 996
18 HIGGINBOTHAM PROPERTIES LLC 11,200 11142 003 12,856 219 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 112 21 476 993 422 NORMA JEAN CLIFTON SURVIVORS TRUST 1,289 112 21 330 1,289 622 DILLARD DENNIS R 1,558 112 42 082 1,463
19 FOLSOM PROJECTS LLC 7,000 11142 006 6,999 220 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 477 1,126 423 PORTER RUSSEL BENTON 1,098 112 21 331 1,098 623 DEL BLANCO SANCHO TRUST 1,580 112 42 083 1,412
20 FEDGSA Parking Lot 21,000 111 42 007B Parking Lot 221 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 478 1,394 424 DAVIS JUSTIN ROBERT/BETTY ANN HINDERKS TR 853 112 21 332 833 624 GEORGETTA WHITTLER REVOCABLE TRUST 1,160 112 42 084 1,074
21 CUNNINGHAM BUILDING LLC 7,000 11142 008 See ID # 22 222 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 479 1,394 425 VANCE KRISTIN 837 112 21 333 837 625 HAPPY WEARING SHORTS TRUST 1,160 112 42 085 1,076
22 CUNNINGHAM BUILDING LLC 7,000 11142 010 10,955 223 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 480 1,126 426 MORALES GABRIEL 842 112 21 334 837 626 CATHERINE A TOLBERT REVOCABLE TRUST 1,142 112 42 086 1,142
23 JOHN E GARRETSON LIVING TRUST/FABER BARTON L 4,200 11142 012 Parking Lot 224 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 21 481 962 427 SUMAR INVESTMENTS DOWNTOWN LLC 866 112 21 335 858 627 SALES RICHARD 1,707 112 42 087 1,520
24 JOHN E GARRETSON LIVING TRUST/FABER BARTON L 8,400 11142 013 Parking Lot 225 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 112 21 482 1,310 428 OLIVIERI BRYAN JULIUS 796 112 21 336 751 628 GARLAND JEFFREY A 1,625 112 42 088 1,426
25 JOHN E GARRETSON LIVING TRUST/FABER BARTON L 7,000 11142 016 Parking Lot 226 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 112 21 483 1,159 429 BETTER INVESTMENTS LLC 710 112 21 337 710 629 COOPER SCOTT 953 112 42 089 900
26 JOHN E GARRETSON LIVING TRUST/GARRETSON JOHN E 10,500 111 42 018 Parking Lot 227 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 112 21 484 1,323 430 SIMMONS EARL/JOHNSON AMY 797 112 21 338 861 630 ANTILLON VICTOR D 1,085 112 42 090 1,020
27 AP 355 N CENTRAL PROPERTY LLC C/O RAJEN SHASTRI 21,675 11145 188B 333,508 228 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 112 21 485 993 431 LE KRISTIE/SIMON 960 112 21 339 953 631 LUI JERRY/SHARON 1,030 112 42 091 996
28 APPLE NINE HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP INC. 16,760 11145 188A 125,871 229 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 486 1,126 432 SCHWARTZ IRA 1,289 112 21 340 1,289 632 ANGOTTI ROCKY 1,558 112 42 092 1,463
29 BURGE GOLDIE H & RICHARD W 7,000 11142 025 3,508 230 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 487 1,394 433 HOWARD PARDI 1,098 112 21 341 1,098 633 KYBARTAS TRUST 1,580 112 42 093 1,412
30 Merged into ID 1 231 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 488 1,394 434 RESSEGUIE WILLIAM T 833 112 21 342 833 634 SCHULTZ STEVEN ROBERT/ANNETTE CHANG 1,160 112 42 094 1,074
Parcel No Longer Exists
31 EVRONSNYDER PATRICIA E 7,000 111 42 041A Parking Lot 232 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 489 1,126 435 WATSON JAN/DALE KANE 837 112 21 343 837 635 EPPERSON SARAH E 1,160 112 42 095 1,076
32 SCHEEL ABIGAIL A 984 11142 117 984 233 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 21 490 962 436 OWEN RANDY 842 112 21 344 837 636 GORMAN STEPHEN G/TRACEY ANN 1,142 112 42 096 1,142
33 FERGUSON ANNE YVONNE 1,100 11142 118 1,100 234 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 112 21 491 1,310 437 VILLA COLBY 866 112 21 345 858 637 MARTIN CHRISTOPHER 1,707 112 42 097 1,520
34 MYERS JOHN 1,358 11142 119 1,358 235 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 112 21 492 1,159 438 ORPHEUM GROUP LLC 796 112 21 346 751 638 BEVERLY H BYAS LIVING TRUST 1,625 112 42 098 1,426
35 MELISSA M CARRUTH LIVING TRUST 1,243 11142 120 1,243 236 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 112 21 493 1,323 439 KURNETA JASON 710 112 21 347 710 639 KIDD TOBY 953 112 42 099 900
36 DODGE MARIA 960 11142 121 960 237 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 112 21 494 993 440 KRAUJALIS MATTHEW 797 112 21 348 861 640 C2 ACQUISITIONS 1,085 112 42 100 1,020
37 DEMIC NEMANJA/HAYS DAKOTA 927 11142 122 927 238 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 495 1,126 441 ORPHEUM 807 LLC 960 112 21 349 960 641 HIROTA CHRISTOPH/HIGAMI AI 1,030 112 42 101 996
38 SCUTTI THEODORE J 1,654 11142 123 1,654 239 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 496 1,394 442 ALLESSANDRONI JARED W 1,289 112 21 350 1,174 642 GUTIERREZ ALEX SR/GAIL A 1,558 112 42 102 1,463
39 COFSKY EMILY DIANE/DAVENPORT MARY R 1,310 11142 124 1,310 240 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 497 1,394 443 ALLESSANDRONI JARED W 1,162 112 21 351 1,098 643 HINDMON SANDRA/WILLIAM E 1,580 112 42 103 1,412
40 SHERMAN JEFFERY 1,334 11142 125 1,334 241 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 498 1,126 444 GEIGER JULIAN 853 112 21 352 833 644 MANZO EFRAIN 1,160 112 42 104 1,074
41 NORTHHOLD LLC 1,247 11142 126 1,247 242 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 21 499 962 445 MARTINEZ CHRIS H 793 112 21 353 837 645 LESTER CHAD 1,160 112 42 105 1,076
42 MARASCO MICHELLE ANN 1,492 11142 127 1,492 243 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,119 112 21 592 1,119 446 CENTRAL CITY CONDO LLC 842 112 21 354 837 646 SANCHEZ LEONARDO 1,142 112 42 106 1,149
43 SHOOP ETHAN 1,222 11142 128 1,338 244 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,880 112 21 593 1,880 447 SMITH JAMES 866 112 21 355 858 647 DANA ROBERT HICKS LIVING TRUST 1,707 112 42 107 1,520
44 HAMMERSMITH TRUST 1,239 11142 129 1,239 245 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,873 112 21 594 1,873 448 ARMENTA BENNIE/MARLA 796 112 21 356 751 648 WALSH FAMILY TRUST 1,625 112 42 108 1,426
45 ROBERT AND HOLLY KRANTZ 2004 TRUST 1,291 11142 130 1,291 246 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,119 112 21 595 2,119 449 CHAVEZ RENE/MARIA G 710 112 21 357 710 649 GOSIEWSKI MARK J 953 112 42 109 900
46 PETERSON ANDREW 1,094 11142 131 1,094 247 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 596 1,394 450 JOVELLANOS ROEL 797 112 21 358 861 650 LE NHAN THANH/HARUTA LE AKEMI 1,085 112 42 110 1,020
47 ARNOLD CLAUDIA 1,803 11142 132 1,803 248 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 597 1,394 451 SHEDD SCOTT 960 112 21 359 953 651 MARY KAYE NELLES LIVING TRUST 1,030 112 42 111 996
48 RK1 MANAGEMENT LLC 1,370 11142 133 1,370 249 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 598 1,126 452 SUAREZ J MICHAEL TR 1,289 112 21 360 1,174 652 WIELAGE CHARLOTTE RICE/JEFFREY DAVID 1,558 112 42 112 1,463
49 ADELMAN JENNIFER KAYE/GUTIERREZ RICK JOSEPH 1,310 11142 134 1,310 250 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 21 599 962 453 CASCIARO SANDOVAL FAMILY LIVING 1,162 112 21 361 1,098 653 FOLKERTH CHERYL D/JACK D 1,580 112 42 113 1,412
50 ASTRA QOZB LLC 7,000 11142 082 Parking Lot 251 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,880 112 21 508 1,880 454 BOUCHEE SHEREE 853 112 21 362 833 654 HARRIS TREMAYNE 1,160 112 42 114 1,074
51 ASTRA QOZB LLC 7,000 11142 080 Parking Lot 252 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,873 112 21 509 1,873 455 HLK MANAGEMENT LLC 794 112 21 363 837 655 CAMPOS BAUTISTA BLANCA FABIOLA 1,160 112 42 115 1,076
52 ASTRA QOZB LLC 7,000 11142 078 Parking Lot 253 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 112 21 510 993 456 RYBACK MICHAEL G 843 112 21 364 837 656 MANN GEOFFREY L 1,142 112 42 116 1,149
53 ASTRA QOZB LLC 7,000 11142 076 Parking Lot 254 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 511 1,126 457 OBOYLE ROBERT MARC 866 112 21 365 858 657 KELLY MICHAEL 1,707 112 42 117 1,520
54 ASTRA QOZB LLC 7,000 11142 074 Parking Lot 255 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 512 1,394 458 ALEX & COMPANY LLC 796 112 21 366 751 658 MCCOMAS SCOT A/COMBS DENNIS E 1,625 112 42 118 1,426
55 ASTRA QOZB LLC 7,000 11142 073 Parking Lot 256 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 513 1,394 459 BONFELD JESSE MARK/LEBOW MARGOT HAHN 710 112 21 367 710 659 LOPEZ TYLER DANIEL 953 112 42 119 900
56 ASTRA QOZB LLC 7,000 11142 065 Parking Lot 257 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 514 1,126 460 MERTENS SCOTT E 861 112 21 368 861 660 SCOTT KEVIN/LISA 1,085 112 42 120 1,020
57 ASTRA QOZB LLC 7,000 11142 066 Parking Lot 258 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 21 515 962 461 WALSH MATTHEW R 960 112 21 369 960 661 WOO GLENN/GALE 1,030 112 42 121 996
58 ASTRA QOZB LLC 845 11142 067 Parking Lot 259 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,880 112 21 540 1,880 462 SAN MARCO 77 LLC 1,289 112 21 370 1,174 662 SUMMIT 1205 LLC 1,558 112 42 122 1,463
59 ASTRA QOZB LLC 6,155 11142 068 Parking Lot 260 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,880 112 21 541 1,880 463 VAN RIPER MARDI MARIE 1,162 112 21 371 1,098 663 AWENDER DARREN S 1,580 112 42 123 1,412
60 ASTRA QOZB LLC 7,000 11142 069 Parking Lot 261 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 112 21 542 993 464 SIGALA ERICK ALBERTO 737 112 21 372 833 664 NATH NEERAJ/ARCHNA 1,160 112 42 124 1,074
61 ASTRA QOZB LLC 7,000 11142 071 Parking Lot 262 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 543 1,126 465 HANS W MATHIESEN TRUST 2,559 112 21 373 2,668 665 DIEWALD MICHAEL 1,160 112 42 125 1,076
62 ASTRA QOZB LLC 6,300 11142 091 Parking Lot 263 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,441 112 21 544 1,394 466 TASB LLC 3,691 112 21 374 3,691 666 MCGINNIS SHANE MICHAEL 1,142 112 42 126 1,149
63 PHOENIXWells Fargo Building 52,990 111 42 106B 253,464 264 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,440 112 21 545 1,394 467 HANA GROUP LLC 1,487 112 21 583 9,445 667 ALBRIGHT FAMILY TRUST 1,707 112 42 127 1,520
64 ASU Downtown Residence Hall 9,499 11142 087A 1,116 265 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 546 1,126 468 JYC RESTAURANT GROUP LLC 1,568 112 21 584 9,445 668 CASCIA KRISTINA TRUST 1,625 112 42 128 1,426
65 ASU Downtown Residence Hall 7,000 11142 085 3510 266 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 21 547 962 469 JACOBO FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC 3,268 112 21 585 9,445 669 GREGORY M AND DONNA P HULBERT FAMILY TRUST 953 112 42 129 900
66 ASU Downtown Residence Hall 7,000 11142 083 2853 267 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,880 112 21 548 1,880 470 HEM PIMARNMAN LLC 1,706 112 21 586 9,445 670 POLLAK KEVIN 1,085 112 42 130 1,020
67 ASU Downtown Residence Hall 6,971 11142 081A Vacant Lot 268 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,873 112 21 549 1,873 471 DAISY ADAMS LLC C105 1,416 112 21 587 9,445 671 CHOU MICHAEL/YUEN VIVIAN 1,030 112 42 131 996
68 ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS 6,906 11142 079A Parking Lot 269 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 112 21 550 993 472 MILSAP ANDREW NELSON/FOSTER GRACE ELIZABETH ANN 138 112 21 588 138 672 FARRAGE MICHAEL J & CYNTHIA K 1,558 112 42 132 1,463
69 ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS 6,921 11142 077A Parking Lot 270 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 551 1,126 473 C107 AMD C108 LLC 561 112 21 589 1,169 673 HAROLD E CAMPBELL III AND JEANETTE LEE CAMPBELL LIVING TRUST 1,580 112 42 133 1,412
70 ASU LOT NORTH OF YMCAABOR 6,996 111 42 075A 2,591 271 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,441 112 21 552 1,394 474 C107 AMD C108 LLC 184 112 21 590 1,169 674 MOON BLOSSOM INVESTMENTS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1,160 112 42 134 1,074
71 YMCA OF PHOENIX 21,275 11142 064C 110,962 272 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,440 112 21 553 1,394 475 C109 LLC 424 112 21 591 1,169 675 BENHARBON JULIANA 1,160 112 42 135 1,076
71A ASU STUDENT REC CENTER 20,325 11142 138 78,806 273 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 554 1,126 475A 101 NORTH FIRST AVE LLC 45,319 112 21 375 591,390 676 BORSA JOSHUA A/JOHN J/ANNE M 1,142 112 42 136 1,149
72 ASU FORMER BAIL BONDS BUILDING 7,000 11142 064B Vacant Lot 274 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 21 555 962 476 Parcel No Longer Exists Lot merge 677 SULTZABERGER MICHAEL L/JENNIFER L 1,707 112 42 137 1,520
73 YMCA OF PHOENIX 7,000 11142 072 110,962 275 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,880 112 21 556 1,880 477 1 WEST MONROE LLC 8,594 112 21 059 18,236 678 CHRISTOPHER P AND ANN M SLATE 2006 TRUST/SLATE JESSICA 1,625 112 42 138 1,426
74 YMCA OF PHOENIX 7,000 11142 070 See ID # 73 276 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,873 112 21 557 1,873 478 130 N CENTRAL LLC 6,875 112 21 057 31,373 679 TUCKER LINDSAY A 953 112 42 139 900
75 Parcel No Longer Exists Lot merge 277 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 11221 558 993 479 130 N CENTRAL LLC 1,719 112 21 063 See ID # 478 680 DWYER TED L/THERESA 1,085 112 42 140 1,020
76 Parcel No Longer Exists Lot merge 278 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 559 1,126 480 CHAVESTORS LLC 10,425 112 21 058 82,246 681 BRODEUR GERALD A JR 1,030 112 42 141 996
77 Parcel No Longer Exists Lot merge 279 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,441 11221 560 1,394 481 108 110 NORTH CENTRAL PROPERTIES LLC 5,200 112 21 061 3,772 682 ALDER KNOTT HOLDINGS LLC 1,558 112 42 142 1,463
78 JOHN E GARRETSON LIVING TRUST/GARRETSON JOHN E 14,000 111 42 103A Parking Lot 280 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,440 112 21 561 1,394 482 RASKIN RANDALL E/JENNA R TR 5,000 112 21 060 11,284 683 SHUGRUE TIMOTHY L/JACQUELINE L 1,580 112 42 143 1,412
79 PHOENIXCompass Bank/TRANSIT BLDG 7,000 111 42 099 Parking Lot 281 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 562 1,126 483 CSM PHOENIX DOWNTOWN LLC 20,604 112 28 133 155,072 684 WESDELL MICHAEL C 1,160 112 42 144 1,074
80 PHOENIXCompass Bank/TRANSIT BLDG 7,000 111 42 097 See ID # 81 282 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 21 563 962 484 CSM PHOENIX DOWNTOWN LLC 6,875 112 28 039 Alley 685 GIVARGIZNIA RUMSIN LEON 1,160 112 42 145 1,076
81 PHOENIXCompass Bank/TRANSIT BLDG 18,018 111 42 094 232,670 283 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,879 112 21 564 1,879 485 PHOENIX HOTEL VENTURES LLC 6,875 112 28 037 44,621 686 TEARPAK BONNIE 1,142 112 42 146 1,149
82 ASUU. S. Post Office/ASU STUDENT UNION 78,300 111 42 061 54,265 284 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,872 112 21 565 1,872 486 PHOENIX HOTEL VENTURES LLC 6,875 112 28 035 See ID # 485 687 TORRES GARCIA 1,707 112 42 147 1,520
83 PHOENIXPARKS CIVIC SPACE 130,445 111 42 137 28,575 285 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,121 112 21 566 2,121 487 PHOENIX HOTEL VENTURES LLC 6,886 112 28 038 See ID # 489 688 BURNLEY HERBERT L/LEE BURNLEY JANIE 1,625 112 42 148 1,426
84 MEANS LTD LLP 7,270 11142 062 8,540 286 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,440 112 21 567 1,394 488 PHOENIX HOTEL VENTURES LLC 6,886 112 28 040 See ID # 489 689 ENCHINTON JONATHAN 953 112 42 149 900
85 ELECTRIC RED VENTURES LLC 111,639 11142 140 Construction 287 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,441 112 21 568 1,394 489 PHOENIX HOTEL VENTURES LLC 20,618 112 28 042 609,885 690 DERUEDA NATHANIEL PATRICK/PATRICK J/KELLY DERUEDA KATERINA 1,085 112 42 150 1,085
86 ASU JOURNALISM/UCENT SUPERBLOCK 202,772 11145 183 645,508 288 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,079 112 21 569 2,079 490 ADAMS LAND LEASE LLC/PHOENIX LAND LEASE LLC 6,886 112 28 036 See ID # 489 691 MULVIHILL BRIAN J/GIOIA CHRISTINE A 1,030 112 42 151 996
87 Parcel split into ID 27 and ID 28 289 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,880 11221 570 1,880 491 H E PHOENIX LLC 90,102 112 28 044A 631,780 692 KELLY D AND SHANNON E MILLER 1998 TRUST 1,558 112 42 152 1,463
88 ARCP OFC PHOENIX (CENTRAL) AZ LLC 48,832 11145 189 782,912 290 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,872 112 21 571 1,872 492 PHOENIX CONVENTION CENTER 718,682 112 29 094 1,636,027 693 BRAD E DENNISON REVOCABLE TRUST 1,580 112 42 153 1,412
89 Valley Youth Theater Building 7,000 11145 066 6,930 291 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,121 112 21 572 2,121 493 PHOENIX HERITAGE & SCIENCE PARK (GARAGE) 417,828 112 29 090 440,020 694 ROBERT L AND JEAN A FRALEY TRUST 1,160 112 42 154 1,074
90 VYTVACANT 7,000 111 45 065 3,500 292 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,440 112 21 573 1,394 494 PHOENIX HERITAGE & SCIENCE PARK (HISTORY MUSEUM) 417,828 112 29 090 440,020 695 FINCH CLARK L/CAROL J 1,160 112 42 155 1,076
91 VYTVACANT 3,494 111 45 064A Vacant Lot 293 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,441 112 21 574 1,394 495 PHOENIX HERITAGE & SCIENCE PARK (SCIENCE MUSEUM) 417,828 112 29 090 440,020 696 JOHN E STRUTHERS AND CLAIRE E STRUTHERS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 1,142 112 42 156 1,142
92 TAYLOR PLACE 52,352 11145 186 359,395 294 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,079 112 21 575 2,079 496 PHOENIX HERITAGE & SCIENCE PARK (SQUARE) 417,828 112 29 090 440,020 697 ARTHUR GARTENBERG TRUST 1,707 112 42 157 1,520
93 VYTCITY PARKING LOT 10,500 111 45 067 Parking Lot 295 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 4,406 112 21 576 4,406 497 PHOENIX New City Hall 67,500 112 21 087 622,637 698 COLLOPY ROBERT/JAMES 1,625 112 42 158 1,426
94 VYTVACANT 3,500 111 45 068 Vacant Lot 296 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,778 112 21 577 2,778 497 PHOENIX Orpheum Theatre 22,500 112 21 087 622,637 699 UNIVERSITY INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC 953 112 42 159 900
94A VYTVACANT 3,498 111 45 069A Vacant Lot 297 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,778 112 21 578 2,778 498 PHOENIX Wells Fargo Building 36,376 112 21 014E 253,640 700 STILES ALYSSA 1,085 112 42 160 1,020
95 MCP BLOCK 23 RESIDENTIAL OWNER LLC 21,516 11228 135 607,790 298 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 4,268 112 21 579 4,268 499 PHOENIX Wells Fargo Building 51,781 112 21 014D 525,816 701 DRANIKOV ALEN 1,030 112 42 161 996
96 BLOCK 23 COMMERCIAL LLC 1 112 8 137 Airspace 299 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,723 112 21 580 2,723 500 TWO RENAISSANCE LLC 2,500 112 21 001 727,849 702 JARED AND AGGIE SHAPIRO LIVING TRUST 1,558 112 42 162 1,463
97 BLOCK 23 COMMERCIAL LLC 48,299 11228 134 551,243 300 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,723 112 21 581 2,723 501 TWO RENAISSANCE LLC 4,620 112 21 002 Common Area 703 COPPER SQUARE 1606 LLC 1,580 112 42 163 1,412
98 BLOCK 23 COMMERCIAL LLC 46,145 11228 136 395,317 301 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,880 112 21 600 1,880 502 TWO RENAISSANCE LLC 3,500 112 21 003 Common Area 704 MARZ DAVID MICHAEL/CHARLOTTE ROSE 1,160 112 42 164 1,074
99 DIGITAL PHOENIX VAN BUREN LLC 88,487 11145 077B 376,438 302 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,873 112 21 601 1,873 503 TWO RENAISSANCE LLC 6,575 112 21 004 Common Area 705 SEWELL EDWIN J/CAROL J 1,160 112 42 165 1,076
100 ASU NURSING BLOCK 86,634 11145 182 258,732 303 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,119 112 21 602 2,119 504 TWO RENAISSANCE LLC 4,830 112 21 007 Common Area 706 TERI JONES WAGNON REVOCABLE TRUST 1,142 112 42 166 1,149
101 ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS FOR ASU 42,759 11145 087E 260,278 304 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 603 1,394 505 TWO RENAISSANCE LLC 11,625 112 21 008 See ID # 500 707 POND LIVING TRUST 1,707 112 42 167 1,520
102 B9 SPD Owner LLC 123,348 11145 175 981,015 305 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 604 1,394 506 TWO RENAISSANCE LLC 4,500 112 21 009 See ID # 500 708 FARAHMAND ROGER 1,625 112 42 168 1,426
103 PIVOT 200 EVB LLC 33,678 11145 080A 250,000 306 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 112 21 605 1,126 507 TWO RENAISSANCE LLC 4,500 112 21 012 See ID # 500 709 DECICCO MICHAEL 953 112 42 169 900
104 CFD3 OZ LLC 118,265 11146 146 87,040 307 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 21 606 962 508 ONE RENAISSANCE LLC C/O THE PAULS CORP 41,540 112 21 086 569,101 710 SIDLOW JAIMIE I 1,085 112 42 170 1,020
105 AZ CENTER LLC 198,690 11146 148 230,467 308 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,880 112 21 607 1,880 509 PHOENIX MC PROPERTIES 25,975 112 28 139 Construction 711 LAMBEAU MICHELLE 1,030 112 42 171 996
106 AZ CENTER LLC 63,815 11146 138 412,981 309 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,873 112 21 608 1,873 510 424 NORTH CENTRAL AVE LLC 7,001 112 28 130 24,871 712 CHAN KELLY 1,558 112 42 172 1,463
107 NADG PALM COURT TOWER LP 39,971 11146 141 Construction 310 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,119 112 21 609 2,119 511 PFP 5 SUB ONE, LLC c/o Prime Finance Partners 56,971 112 28 132 833,326 713 WOODRUFF JAYSON REACE/CHRISTINA DARYL 1,580 112 42 173 1,412
108 AZ CENTER LLC 56,095 11146 143 Common Area 311 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 610 1,394 512 PHOENIX Hyatt Garage 20,625 112 28 071 101,251 714 EASLEY JAMES KAIMANA 1,160 112 42 174 1,074
109 PCPI TWO ARIZONA LLC 46,125 11146 132 632,852 312 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 611 1,394 513 PHOENIX Hyatt Garage 20,625 112 28 066 101,251 715 LORDEUS MAKENSLEY 1,160 112 42 175 1,076
110 ALDK PHOENIX LLC 49,190 11146 139 124,539 313 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,088 112 21 612 2,088 514 THREE E ONE NORTH FIRST INVESTMENT CO LL 8,941 112 28 067 See ID #516 716 ROCHE TAM 1,142 112 42 176 1,142
111 NPG PHX1 AZC LLC 72,100 11146 133 2,591 314 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,880 112 21 613 1,880 515 THREE E ONE NORTH FIRST INVESTMENT CO LL 4,817 112 28 072 See ID #516 717 DOMINGUEZ JOSE 1,707 112 42 177 1,520
112 CFD2 OZ LLC 39,428 11146 147 Parking Lot 315 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,873 112 21 614 1,873 516 THREE E ONE NORTH FIRST INVESTMENT CO LL 3,440 112 28 073 140,714 718 MARK H FRAMPTON LIVING TRUST 1,625 112 42 178 1,426
113 ABC1ABOR ASU UofA 38,230 111 46 151A 89,725 316 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,119 112 21 615 2,119 517 LIEBHABER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP 3,440 112 28 068 See ID #516 719 BRAINARD CALEB/VOLRICH MICHELLE 953 112 42 179 900
114 XSC PHOENIX INVESTMENT LLC 54,357 11221 974a 643,503 317 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 616 1,394 518 LIEBHABER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP 3,440 112 28 069 20,775 720 MANDT KATHY MICHELLE/CHAD EDWARD 1,085 112 42 180 1,020
115 XSC PHOENIX INVESTMENT LLC 35,891 11221 974b Construction 318 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 112 21 617 1,394 519 LIEBHABER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP 3,440 112 28 070 2,604 721 RINALDI MICHAEL 1,070 112 42 181 996
116 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 114 319 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 2,088 11221 618 2,088 520 132 PALA LLC 3,383 112 28 074 9,249 722 BTMS REVOCABLE TRUST 1,589 112 42 182 1,412
117 VIOLA LORDSMEER LP 87,750 11228 031C Construction 320 44 MONROE MARKETING LLC 14,946 112 21 582A Common Area 521 CHAVESTORS LLC 3,517 112 28 075 4,138 723 MADISON ALAN & DOROTHEA 1,580 112 42 183 1,412
118 FEDFederal Building 89,516 112 21 079A 10,000 321 MARICOPA COUNTY 27,105 112 21 072C 272,909 522 PETER GUS G LLC/SAHNAS CHARLES T/KATHERINE ETAL 6,884 112 28 076 14,989 724 BOREHAM AKIRA/PATRICIA 1,160 112 42 184 1,074
119 101 NORTH FIRST AVE LLC 22,212 11221 089A Parking 322 RB PHOENIX LLC 13,730 112 21 070 78,059 523 PHOENIX C. Goode Bldg. 149,803 112 22 074A 225,650 725 LACHEMANN JAMES/ELIZABETH 1,160 112 42 185 1,076
120 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,376 11221 376 1,376 323 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 524 MARICOPA COUNTY Old Courthouse 56,336 112 22 075A 91,061 726 SCHMITZ ROBERT W 1,177 112 42 186 1,149
ID Reassigned to 777
121 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 541 112 1 377 541 324 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 525 727 AXELROD GREGORY S/HEIDI 1,707 112 42 187 1,520
ID Reassigned to 771 and 772
122 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 726 11221 378 726 325 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 526 728 WHITE GREGORY 1,625 112 42 188 1,426
123 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,326 11221 380 1,308 326 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 527 ID Reassigned to 773 776 729 LEE ROBERT 953 112 42 189 900
124 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 11221 381 1,159 327 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 528 SCI LUHRS PHX LLC 32,214 112 22 105b 53,222 730 ENTRUST NEW ENGLAND LLC 1,085 112 42 190 1,020
125 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,344 11221 382 1,322 328 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 529 PEG PHX JEFFERSON STREET LLC 13,124 112 22 105c 103,377 731 ASCHENBRENNER DAWN 1,070 112 42 191 996
126 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,308 11221 383 1,308 329 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 530 Parcel No Longer Exists Lot merge 732 TONY LEWIS TRUST 1,589 112 42 192 1,412
127 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 11221 384 1,159 330 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 531 Parcel Split into ID's 764 768 733 CHEESEMAN DAVID 1,580 112 42 193 1,412
128 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,322 11221 385 1,322 331 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 532 Parcel Split into ID's 95 98 734 HASTINGS JAY/KIMBERLY 1,160 112 42 194 1,074
129 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 994 112 1 386 994 332 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 533 ID Reassigned to 778 735 DIANE K SCHWILLING LIVING TRUST 1,160 112 42 195 1,076
130 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,117 11221 387 1,126 333 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 534 ID Reassigned to 779 736 EYCHANER RICH 1,177 112 42 196 1,149
131 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 743 11221 388 743 334 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 535 Parcel Split into ID's 781 785 737 GOODWIN DEBRA & LINDA 1,707 112 42 197 1,520
132 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 743 11221 389 743 335 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 536 ID Reassigned to 780 738 DUNHAM RUSSELL TOBIN 1,812 112 42 198 1,812
133 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,115 11221 390 1,126 336 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 537 Parcel Split into ID's 781 785 739 BUNGER ROBERT 1,405 112 42 199 1,405
134 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 965 11221 391 965 337 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 538 PHOENIX CONV CTR SOUTH 403,744 112 30 123 351,268 740 BARTUSKA SCOTT 1,418 112 42 200 1,418
135 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 11221 392 1,310 338 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 539 PHOENIX Civic Plaza East Garage 236,661 112 30 127 1,219,400 741 DONAT ROBERT 1,899 112 42 201 1,899
136 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 11221 393 1,159 339 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 540 MARICOPA COUNTY Superior Court Comp. 209,552 112 22 049B 807,458 742 STEVEN MICHAEL MYLAND FAMILY TRUST 1,532 112 42 202 1,532
137 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 11221 394 1,323 340 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 541 Parcel Split into ID's 528 529 743 OSBY EDMUND J/CHARLENE R 1,533 112 42 203 1,533
138 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 11221 395 993 341 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 542 SCI LUHRS PHX LLC 29,563 112 24 216A 142,386 744 SCOTT FREE TIMMONS TRUST 1,981 112 42 204 1,981
139 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 396 1,126 342 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 542A HHLUHRS LLC 15,728 112 24 217A 240,269 745 SCHMIDT RONALD/SUSAN 1,405 112 42 205 1,405
140 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 397 1,394 343 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 543 JEFFERSON PLACE PARTNERS LLC 7,500 112 27 060A 47,219 746 REIN SCOTT 1,418 112 42 206 1,418
141 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 398 1,394 344 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 544 JEFFERSON PLACE PARTNERS LLC 7,500 112 27 058A Parking Lot 747 THUY NGO TRUST 1,796 112 42 207 1,796
142 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 399 1,126 345 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 545 JEFFERSON PLACE PARTNERS LLC 4,062 112 27 056B Parking Lot 748 RYAN MAASEN TRUST 1,532 112 42 208 1,532
143 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 11221 400 962 346 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 546 JEFFERSON PLACE PARTNERS LLC 11,995 112 27 055E Parking Lot 749 JACKSON JEFFERY 1,533 112 42 209 1,533
144 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 11221 401 1,310 347 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 547 JOHN E GARRETSON LIVING TRUST/ETAL 12,813 112 27 052C Parking Lot 750 BEVERLY H BYAS LIVING TRUST 1,981 112 42 210 1,981
145 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 11221 402 1,159 348 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 548 JEFFERSON PLACE PARTNERS LLC 15,000 112 27 059A Parking Lot 751 GARNIER PHILIPPE/NICOLE CONSTANTINO 1,405 112 42 211 1,405
146 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 11221 403 1,323 349 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 549 JEFFERSON PLACE PARTNERS LLC 6,875 112 27 057B Parking Lot 752 BROWN DANIEL C/AMY S 1,418 112 42 212 1,418
147 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 11221 404 993 350 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 550 JOHN E GARRETSON LIVING TRUST/ETAL 20,625 112 27 053G Parking Lot 753 2204 SUMMIT LLC 1,796 112 42 213 1,796
148 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 405 1,126 351 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 551 PHOENIX Sports Arena 374,627 112 27 114 509,090 754 WAGONER RANDAL WARREN/SABRA SUSAN TR 1,532 112 42 214 1,532
149 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 406 1,394 352 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 552 JEFFERSON STREET GARAGE, LLC 114,127 112 30 126 342,465 755 COX SARAH H 1,533 112 42 215 1,533
150 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 407 1,394 353 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 553 MARICOPA COUNTY STADIUM DISTRICT 1,082,039 112 30 128E 997,437 756 THE SUMMIT AT COPPER SQUARE LLC 25,040 112 42 216A Common Area
151 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 408 1,126 354 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 554 MARICOPA COUNTY Jail Complex 94,194 112 22 091 62,500 757 COPPER SQUARE 4TH ST LLC 8,337 112 42 216B 8,886
152 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 11221 409 962 355 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 555 MARICOPA COUNTY Court Tower 130,223 112 22 035A 671,804 758 COPPER SQUARE 4TH ST LLC 2,267 112 42 216C 2,275
153 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 11221 410 1,310 356 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 556 MADISON 27 LLC 7,913 112 22 041A Parking Lot 759 MARICOPA COUNTY Court Tower Plaza 41,607 112 22 108 Common Area
154 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 11221 411 1,159 357 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 557 MADISON 27 LLC 13,750 112 22 038A 9,701 760 KLANCO INC 138 112 27 117 Alley
155 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 11221 412 1,323 358 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 558 PRATT GILBERT OWNER I LLC 13,750 112 22 036 Construction 761 DESERT NECTAR LLC 14,004 111 42 021A 821
156 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 11221 413 993 359 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 559 SUNRISE EQUITIES LLC 19,682 112 22 103 20,844 762 ARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIETY 76,137 111 45 190 349,454
157 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 414 1,126 360 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 560 PRATT GILBERT OWNER II LLC 12,375 112 22 037 Construction 763 CITY OF PHOENIX ASU THUNDERBIRD 25,380 111 45 191 Common Area
158 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 415 1,394 361 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 561 SUNS LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC 13,750 112 27 071 Vacant Lot 764 Parcel No Longer Exists Previously Airspace
159 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 416 1,394 362 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 117 562 SUNS LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC 6,875 112 27 069 2,928 765 RED DEVELOPMENT CITYSCAPE OFFICE RETAIL 89,330 112 27 976 550,269
160 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 417 1,126 363 VIOLA LORDSMEER LP 87,750 112 28 012B 655,780 563 SUNS LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC 4,125 112 27 067 Parking Lot 766 CITYSCAPE RESIDENCES, LP CITYSCAPE APARTMENTS 3,621 112 27 977 259,901
161 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 11221 418 962 364 PHOENIX Herberger Theater (Building) 51,497 112 28 128 33,301 564 SUNS LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC 2,750 112 27 066 Parking Lot 767 DIAMONDROCK PHX OWNER, LLC CITYSCAPE HOTEL 9,583 112 27 978 211,359
162 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 11221 419 1,310 365 PHOENIX Herberger Theater (Plaza) 33,963 112 28 129 Common Area 565 SUNS LEGACY PROPERTIES LLC 6,875 112 27 064 Parking Lot 768 RED DEVELOPMENT CITYSCAPE PARKING GARAGE 102,533 112 27 979 545,577
163 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 11221 420 1,159 366 ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PHOENIX 186,232 112 29 091 135,520 566 SUNS LEGACY PROPERTIES 3,250 112 27 062 Parking Lot 769 PHOENIX BIOMEDICAL CAMPUS 532,323 111 46 154 940,067
164 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 11221 421 1,323 367 ASU MERCADO 167,053 112 29 089 128,580 567 SUNS LEGACY PROPERTIES 3,625 112 27 061 Parking Lot 770 PHOENIX BIOMEDICAL CAMPUS 53,231 111 46 155 181,608
165 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 112 1 422 993 368 MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO 20,624 112 21 970 77,716 568 10 E JACKSON LLC 12,375 112 27 072 14,638 771 PHOENIX City Scape (Level 1) City 108,447 112 22 107B 46,270
166 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 423 1,126 369 MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO 16,200 112 21 972 See ID # 368 569 22 E JACKSON LLC 6,875 112 27 070 6,875 772 RED DEVELOPMENT PARKING LEVEL 3 (PARTIAL) 61,742 112 22 107B 46,270
167 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 424 1,394 370 MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO 48,923 112 21 973A See ID # 368 570 34 E JACKSON QOZB LLC 6,875 112 27 068 41,250 773 PHOENIX RS ONE LLC 24,682 112 22 107C 92,540
168 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 425 1,394 371 MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO 442 112 21 084 See ID # 368 571 34 E JACKSON QOZB LLC 6,875 112 27 065 41,251 774 PHOENIX City Scape (Level 3) RED Development 22,024 112 22 107D 92,540
169 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 426 1,126 372 EQUUS ELLIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 9,174 112 21 050F 58,626 572 34 E JACKSON QOZB LLC 6,875 112 27 063 See ID # 571 775 PHOENIX City Scape (Level 4) RED Development 98,999 112 22 107E 92,540
170 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 112 1 427 962 373 GP MONROE OWNER LLC 32,188 112 21 050H 378,016 573 241 W JACKSON STREET LLC 6,875 112 22 015 Parking Lot 776 PHOENIX City Scape (Level 5) RED Development 40,782 112 22 107F 92,540
171 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 11221 428 1,310 374 PHX INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC 20,699 112 21 278 111,890 574 241 W JACKSON STREET LLC 6,875 112 22 014 Parking Lot 777 CITYSCAPE RETAIL 96,167 112 22 107A 459,991
172 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 11221 429 1,159 375 ESPACO 2118 LLC 5,560 112 21 279 Parking Lot 575 ARIZONA HOUSING INC 27,511 112 22 104 129,533 778 USPO PHOENIX, LLC c/o Sumitomo Corporation of Amercias 165,450 112 27 120 496,350
173 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 11221 430 1,323 376 114 ADAMS LLC 857 112 21 284 837 576 COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC 17,188 112 22 008D 13,457 779 USPO PHOENIX, LLC c/o Sumitomo Corporation of Amercias 65,831 112 27 121 61,488
174 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 11221 431 993 377 CHARLEMANGE DAVID 1,030 112 21 285 1,030 577 R C H C LLC 6,875 112 22 004 6,875 780 USPO PHOENIX, LLC c/o Sumitomo Corporation of Amercias 25,137 112 27 123 536,452
175 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 432 1,126 378 BERNARDEZ MICHAEL 1,835 112 21 286 1,706 578 R C H C LLC 6,875 112 22 003 6,875 781 COLLIER CENTER PT, LLC C/O GE ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. 16,592 112 27 985 19,844
176 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 433 1,394 379 BORYSKA FAMILY LIVING TRUST 883 112 21 287 876 579 MARICOPA COUNTY 10,313 112 22 001 2,704 782 COLLIER CENTER PT, LLC C/O CROWN REALTY & DEVELOPMENT 10,089 112 27 986 Common Area
177 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 434 1,394 380 LADWIG JODY 1,110 112 21 288 1,110 580 ANJER LLC 54,050 112 22 974 Parking Lot 783 COLLIER CENTER PT, LLC C/O CROWN REALTY & DEVELOPMENT 9,503 112 27 987 Common Area
178 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 435 1,126 381 BEALS MATHEW 726 112 21 289 755 581 1 E JACKSON LLC 6,776 112 27 108 6,770 784 COLLIER CENTER PT, LLC C/O GE ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. 29,398 112 27 988 524,298
179 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 11221 436 962 382 GILLIAM JOHN SHERMAN 1,915 112 21 290 1,798 582 AENEAS VENTURE PARTNERS 4 LLC 34,382 112 27 107D 60,000 785 COLLIER CENTER PT, LLC C/O CROWN REALTY & DEVELOPMENT 2,433 112 27 989 39,262
180 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 11221 437 1,310 383 FIERROS KATIE A 870 112 21 291 839 583 KLANCO INVESTMENT LLC 13,615 112 27 116 14,894 786 PHOENIX CANCER CENTER 70,013 111 46 153 222,983
181 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 11221 438 1,159 384 MARY MADGE CIAMPOLI LIVING TRUST 1,753 112 21 292 1,660 584 NIXDT LLC 6,875 112 28 138 94,785 787 PHOENIX TRIANGLE FOR STAGING 38,777 111 46 156 Vacant Lot
182 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 11221 439 1,323 385 OKUNAMI TROY 789 112 21 293 837 585 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 584 789 PHOENIX WEXFORD SOUTH PARKING LOT 89,081 111 44 145 Parking Lot
183 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 11221 440 993 386 SAHA HOLDINGS LLC 799 112 21 294 837 586 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 584 791 PHOENIX WEXFORD PARKING LOT 44,997 111 44 146A Parking Lot
184 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 441 1,126 387 DE LEON LOUIS ARMANDO 823 112 21 295 858 587 Parcel No Longer Exists Merged into ID 584 792 PHOENIX WEXFORD BUILDING 44,997 111 44 146B 262,219
185 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 442 1,394 388 AGENTER TRAVIS 792 112 21 296 751 588 PHOENIX CENTER FOR DENTISTRY LLC 13,750 112 27 111E Parking Lot 793 PHOENIX BIOMEDICAL CAMPUS STAGING LOT 89,875 111 44 147 Parking Lot
186 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 443 1,394 389 MATTHEW THOMAS SWAN TRUST 710 112 21 297 710 589 PHOENIX CENTER FOR DENTISTRY LLC 27,530 112 27 115 25,133 790 MARICOPA COUNTY BIOSCIENCE HIGH SCHOOL 89,822 111 44 143 84,120
187 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 444 1,126 390 STACIOKAS FAMILY TRUST 1,254 112 21 298 1,200 590 301 JACKSON LLC 20,625 112 30 120 Parking Lot 788 ASU HOUSE ON NORTH END OF TRIANGLE 7,500 111 46 081A 1,656
188 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 11221 445 962 391 OCONNELL BUDDY ANN/KATHLEEN C 751 112 21 299 751 591 EHSAN BAKHTAR 1,418 112 42 051 1,418 794 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,896 111 44 104 Vacant Lot
189 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 11221 446 1,310 392 TRIPLE C HOLDINGS LLC 1,307 112 21 300 1,174 592 MONTGOMERY GRACE N 866 112 42 052 900 795 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,896 111 44 105 Vacant Lot
190 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 11221 447 1,159 393 GUERRERO ERICA 1,214 112 21 301 1,098 593 STECKMAN BRIAN GEORGE 998 112 42 053 1,020 796 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,896 111 44 106 Vacant Lot
191 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 11221 448 1,323 394 NOTH ARIELLA 1,794 112 21 302 1,718 594 ROSS MATTHEW S 943 112 42 054 996 797 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,896 111 44 107 Vacant Lot
192 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 11221 449 993 395 LIDDY PROPERTIES LLC 805 112 21 303 837 595 TAYLOR FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 1,446 112 42 055 1,463 798 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,896 111 44 108 Vacant Lot
193 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 450 1,126 396 GILLIAM JOHN S 854 112 21 304 837 596 JOHNSON RICHARD 1,579 112 42 056 1,412 799 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,896 111 44 109 Vacant Lot
194 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 451 1,394 397 RAK KEVIN 872 112 21 305 858 597 BECKHAM ZACKARY KRISTIAN 1,078 112 42 057 1,078 800 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,302 111 44 110 Vacant Lot
195 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,394 11221 452 1,394 398 HAWANA SIX LLC 792 112 21 306 751 598 ISAAC JODY S 1,625 112 42 058 1,426 801 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,342 111 44 111 Vacant Lot
196 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,126 11221 453 1,126 399 CURTIS P HAMANN FAMILY TRUST 710 112 21 307 710 599 JACOBSEN THOMAS 953 112 42 059 900 802 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,382 111 44 112 Vacant Lot
197 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 962 11221 454 962 400 SNITZ TREVOR 1,200 112 21 308 1,200 600 KACZALA TIMOTHY/NANCY 1,085 112 42 060 1,020 803 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,358 111 44 113 Vacant Lot
198 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,310 11221 455 1,310 401 MANVILLE NEIL I/SUSAN L 751 112 21 309 751 601 VILLESCAS NICHOLAS/JENNIFER 1,030 112 42 061 996 804 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,358 111 44 114 2,614
199 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,159 11221 456 1,159 402 UNDERWOOD JOHN M 1,174 112 21 310 1,174 602 GANUS ALEXANDRU 1,558 112 42 062 1,463 805 UA LOT NORTH OF CANCER CENTER 5,358 111 44 115 Vacant Lot
200 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 1,323 11221 457 1,323 403 SHEA DIANA L 1,148 112 21 311 1,148 603 NYE BRADLEY A 1,580 112 42 063 1,412
201 44 MONROE APARTMENTS LLC 993 11221 458 993 404 ROBERT STEVEN SEVERINO LIVING TRUST 1,432 112 21 312 1,432 604 CARAMBERIS VANESSA 1,160 112 42 064 1,074




PAGE 2 KEY:
ASSESSMENT ID #'S
1 805

CHANGES SINCE THE CREATION OF THE PRIOR DIAGRAM
PARCEL OWNERSHIP CHANGES AS OF 04/02/25


UPDATES MADE ON 08.12.25







Report

Issuance of Revenue Bonds (New Freedom Project), and Subordinate Revenue
Capital Appreciation Bonds (New Freedom Project), Series 2025 (Resolution
22334) - Districts 1 & 3

Requests City Council approval of Revenue Bonds (New Freedom Project) and
Subordinate Revenue Capital Appreciation Bonds (New Freedom Project), Series
2025, to be issued in one or more tax-exempt and/or taxable series, in an aggregate
principal amount not to exceed $120,000,000.

Summary
Request City Council adoption of a Resolution (Attachment A) granting approval of
the proceedings under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of
Phoenix, Arizona (the “Phoenix IDA”) has previously resolved to issue up to
$120,000,000 of Revenue Bonds and Subordinate Revenue Capital Appreciation
Bonds (the “Bonds”), Series 2025, for use by New Freedom Project (the “Borrower”),
an Arizona nonprofit corporation, to finance and/or refinance, as applicable, all or a
portion of the costs of:

a. Acquiring (i) the membership interests in, and thereby the assets owned and used
by New Freedom Ops, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company whose sole
member is the Seller (“Operating Company”), (ii) the land, buildings and related
amenities comprising a facility (the “Peoria Avenue Facility”), and (iii) the land,
buildings and related amenities comprising a facility (the “29th Avenue Facility”,
and, together with the Peoria Avenue Facility, the “Facilities”).
b. Funding any required reserve funds.
c. Paying a portion of the interest on the Bonds.
d. Paying fees, expenses and costs incurred in connection with the authorization,
issuance and sale of the Bonds (collectively, the “Project”).

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Revenue Bonds and
Subordinate Revenue Capital Appreciation Bonds at its meeting held on October 7,
2025.





Location
The Peoria Avenue Facility is located at 2532 West Peoria Avenue and the 29th
Avenue Facility is located at 20221 North 29th Avenue.
Council Districts: 1 and 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.





ATTACHMENT A




RESOLUTION _____

A RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE
ISSUANCE OF AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $120,000,000 OF REVENUE BONDS
(NEW FREEDOM PROJECT) AND/OR SUBORDINATE
REVENUE CAPITAL APPRECIATION BONDS (NEW

T
FREEDOM PROJECT) IN ONE OR MORE TAX-EXEMPT
AND/OR TAXABLE SERIES OF THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX,
ARIZONA


AF _______________


WHEREAS, The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona




D
(the “Authority”), is a nonprofit corporation designated a political subdivision of the State




R
of Arizona (the “State”) incorporated with the approval of the City of Phoenix, Arizona (the

“City”); and


WHEREAS, Title 35, Chapter 5, of the Arizona Revised Statutes, Section 35-701

et seq., as amended (the “Act”), authorizes the Authority to issue revenue bonds for the

purposes set forth in the Act, including the making of secured and unsecured loans to

finance or refinance the development, acquisition, construction, improvement, equipping

or operation of a “project” (as defined in the Act) whenever the Board of Directors of the

Authority finds such loans to further advance the interests of the Authority or the public

interest, and to refund outstanding obligations incurred by an enterprise to finance the


New Freedom Project 1 Resolution No. ______
1105306790\3\
costs of a “project” when the Board of Directors of the Authority finds that the refinancing

is in the public interest; and


WHEREAS, New Freedom Project, an Arizona nonprofit corporation and an

organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as

amended (“New Freedom”), whose charitable purpose includes providing wide-ranging

assistance to justice involved individuals who are reentering the community, currently

collaborates with New Freedom, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and private

for-profit entity, and its affiliates and related entities (collectively, the “Seller”), to operate

an outpatient treatment program for post incarcerated individuals that provides critical
T
services to such individuals, including behavioral health counseling, peer support and



AF
mentoring, vocational education and job placement (the “Program”); and


WHEREAS, New Freedom has requested that the Authority issue its Revenue

Bonds (New Freedom Project) and Subordinate Revenue Capital Appreciation Bonds



D
(New Freedom Project) in one or more tax-exempt and/or taxable series (the “Bonds”),



R
pursuant to a plan of financing in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed

$120,000,000, the proceeds of which Bonds will be used by the Borrower (defined below)

to finance all or a portion of the costs of: (a) acquiring (i) the membership interests in, and

thereby the assets owned and used by New Freedom Ops, LLC, a Delaware limited

liability company whose sole member is the Seller (“Operating Company”), (ii) the land,

buildings and related amenities comprising a facility located at 2532 West Peoria Avenue,

Phoenix, Arizona (the “Peoria Avenue Facility”), and (iii) the land, buildings and related

amenities comprising a facility located at 20221 North 29th Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona (the

“29th Avenue Facility” and, together with the Peoria Avenue Facility, the “Facilities”); (b)


New Freedom Project 2 Resolution No. ______
1105306790\3\
funding any required reserve funds; (c) paying a portion of the interest on the Bonds; and

(d) paying fees, expenses and costs incurred in connection with the authorization,

issuance and sale of the Bonds (collectively, the “Project”), all in accordance with the Act;

and


WHEREAS, in furtherance of the purposes of the Act and in the interest of the

Authority and the public thereunder, the Authority proposes to issue the Bonds and loan the

proceeds thereof to New Freedom, Operating Company, and New Freedom Prop, LLC, an

Arizona limited liability company whose sole member is New Freedom (“Property Company”

and, collectively with New Freedom and Operating Company and their successors,
T
assignees, and designees, the “Borrower”) to finance all or a portion of the costs of the

Project; and

AF
WHEREAS, the Authority, by Resolution 2025-15, duly adopted by the Board of

Directors of the Authority at a lawful meeting called and held on September 18, 2025



D
granted approval of the issuance and assignment of the Bonds in an aggregate principal



R
amount not to exceed $120,000,000; and


WHEREAS, Section 35-721(B) of the Act provides that the proceedings of the

Authority under which the Bonds are to be issued require the approval of the Council of

the City; and


WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Code requires that an “applicable elected

representative” (as that term is defined in the Code) approve the issuance of the Bonds

and the plan of finance for the Project following a public hearing, which public hearing

was held by the Authority on October 7, 2025; and


New Freedom Project 3 Resolution No. ______
1105306790\3\
WHEREAS, information regarding the Project to be financed with the proceeds of

the Bonds has been presented to the Council of the City; and


WHEREAS, it is intended that this Resolution shall constitute approval by the

Council of the City pursuant to Section 35-721(B) of the Act and of the “applicable elected

representative” as defined in Section 147(f) of the Code with respect to the Obligations.


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PHOENIX, ARIZONA as follows:


SECTION 1. The proceedings of the Authority under which the Bonds are to be

issued are hereby approved. T
AF
SECTION 2. The issuance of the Bonds and the plan of finance for the Project are

hereby approved for purposes of Section 147(f) of the Code.


SECTION 3. Notice of Arizona Revised Statutes Section 38-511 is hereby given.


DR
The provisions of that statute are by this reference incorporated herein to the extent of

their applicability to matters contained herein.




New Freedom Project 4 Resolution No. ______
1105306790\3\
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA this ___ day

of October, 2025.




MAYOR


ATTEST:



Denise Archibald, City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney
T
By:
AF
Chief Counsel David H. Benton




DR
REVIEWED BY:



Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




New Freedom Project 5 Resolution No. ______
1105306790\3\



Report

Issuance of Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds (SSS Academy Project)
(Resolution 22335) - District 2

Requests City Council approval of Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds (SSS
Academy Project), to be issued in one or more separate taxable or tax-exempt series
and subseries, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $150,000,000.

Summary
Request City Council adoption of a Resolution (Attachment A) granting approval of
the proceedings under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of
Phoenix, Arizona (the “Phoenix IDA”) has previously resolved to issue up to
$150,000,000 of Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds (SSS Academy Project) (the
“Bonds”) for use by SSS Academy (the “Borrower”), an Arizona nonprofit corporation,
to finance and/or refinance, as applicable, all or a portion of the costs of:

a. The acquisition, construction, completion and equipping of arena facility
improvements, to be used as educational facilities by the Borrower (the “Facilities”).
b. Funding a debt service reserve fund.
c. Funding working capital and capitalized interest on the Bonds.
d. Paying certain costs of issuance of the Bonds (collectively, the “Project”).

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Bonds at its meeting held
on October 7, 2025.

Location
The Facility is to be located at 2727 West Bronco Butte Trail, Phoenix, AZ.
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.





ATTACHMENT A




RESOLUTION _____

A RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE
ISSUANCE, IN ONE OR MORE SEPARATE TAXABLE OR
TAX-EXEMPT SERIES AND SUBSERIES, OF A PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $150,000,000 OF
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES REVENUE BONDS (SSS
ACADEMY PROJECT) OF THE INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX,
ARIZONA


T
_______________

WHEREAS, The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix,



AF
Arizona (the “Issuer”), is a nonprofit corporation designated a political subdivision of the

State of Arizona (the “State”) incorporated with the approval of the City of Phoenix,

Arizona (the “City”); and




DR
WHEREAS, Title 35, Chapter 5, of the Arizona Revised Statutes, Section

35-701 et seq., as amended (the “Act”), authorizes the Issuer to issue revenue bonds for

the purposes set forth in the Act, including the making of secured and unsecured loans

to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, improvement, equipping or operation

of a “project” (as defined in the Act) whenever the Board of Directors of the Issuer finds

such loans to further advance the interests of the Issuer or the public interest, and to

refund outstanding obligations incurred by an enterprise to finance the costs of a “project”

when the Board of Directors of the Issuer finds such loans to be in furtherance of the

purposes of the Authority or in the public interest; and




WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that the Issuer issue, in one or

more separate taxable or tax-exempt series and subseries, its Educational Facilities

Revenue Bonds (SSS Academy Project) (the “Bonds”), pursuant to a Trust Indenture (the

“Indenture”), between the Issuer and UMB Bank, National Association (the “Trustee”),

and enter into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”), between the Issuer and

the Borrower, pursuant to which the Issuer will loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the

Borrower for purposes of financing or refinancing the costs of (a) the acquisition,

construction, completion and equipping of arena facility improvements located at 2727 W

Bronco Butte Trail, Phoenix, Arizona, to be used as educational facilities by the Borrower

T
(the “Facilities”); (b) funding a debt service reserve fund; (c) funding working capital and




AF
capitalized interest on the Bonds; and (d) paying certain costs of issuance of the Bonds

(collectively, the “Project”), all in accordance with the Act; and

WHEREAS, the Issuer, by Resolution 2025-16, duly adopted by the Board

of Directors of the Issuer at a lawful meeting called and held on September 18, 2025,


D
granted approval of the issuance and sale of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount


R
not to exceed $150,000,000; and

WHEREAS, Section 35-721(B) of the Act provides that the proceedings of

the Issuer under which the Bonds are to be issued require the approval of the Council of

the City; and

WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Code requires that an “applicable elected

representative” (as that term is defined in the Code) approve the issuance of the Bonds

and the plan of finance for the Project following a public hearing, which public hearing

was held by the Authority on October 7, 2025; and



2 Resolution No. _____

WHEREAS, information regarding the Project to be financed with the

proceeds of the Bonds has been presented to the Council of the City; and

WHEREAS, it is intended that this Resolution shall constitute approval by

the Council of the City pursuant to Section 35-721(B) of the Act with respect to the Bonds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA as follows:

SECTION 1. The proceedings of the Issuer under which the Bonds are to

be issued are hereby approved.

SECTION 2. The issuance of the Bonds and the plan of finance for the

Project are hereby approved. T
AF
SECTION 3. Notice of Arizona Revised Statutes Section 38-511 is hereby

given. The provisions of that statute are by this reference incorporated herein to the

extent of their applicability to matters contained herein.




DR

3 Resolution No. _____

PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA this ___ day

of October, 2025.




MAYOR


ATTEST:


City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
T
Acting City Attorney


REVIEWED BY: AF City Manager



DR

Resolution No. _____




Report