← Back to meetings

Meeting Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee-10/18/2023 complete

2023-10-18 · Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee

Items: 84

Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee

View on Agenda Online ↗


Synced: 2026-05-28 03:37 AZ

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on Jan. 6, 2021

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of Jan. 6, 2021, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 11



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.




Page 12
ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: October 18, 2023
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Neighborhood Block Watch Fund Oversight Committee

Councilwoman Ann O’Brien recommends the following for appointment:

Lois Stansbury
Ms. Stansbury is a retiree and resident of District 1. She will serve a term to expire
October 18, 2025.

Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board

I recommend the following for appointment:

David Shilliday
Mr. Shilliday is the Vice President and General Manager of Urban Air Mobility &
Unmanned Aerial Systems at Honeywell Aerospace. He will serve a term to expire
October 18, 2027.




Page 13



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - A Stepping Stone Foundation

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Jon Williams

Location
4320 W. Thunderbird Road
Council District: 1

Function
Award Ceremony

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 4, 2023 - 5:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 170 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 14



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - St. John the Baptist Romanian Orthodox
Church

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Virgil Marchis

Location
3749 W. Behrend Dr.
Council District: 1

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 11, 2023 - 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. / 800 attendees
Nov. 12, 2023 - Noon to 8 p.m. / 700 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 15



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Charley's Place

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 06070503.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
4324 W. Thunderbird Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a bar. This location was previously licensed
for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 28, 2023.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 16


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We have owned and operated other bars throughout the valley. We will ensure our
employees attend their title 4 training class.

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Charley's Place is a small community bar and grill. Great place for people to hang out
with friends and family to enjoy Nascar, football and all sporting events.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Charley's Place
Liquor License Map - Charley's Place

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 17
Liquor License Data: CHARLEY'S PLACE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Liquor Store 9 3 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 1

Restaurant 12 8 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 62.89 47.63 69.1

Violent Crimes 12.05 7.29 8.7

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 47 38

Total Violations 82 63




Page 18
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1042022 2649 87 0 15

1042023 1420 88 18 4

1042121 1193 15 0 17

1042124 2501 80 3 5

1042181 1368 85 8 6

1042182 926 72 3 3

1042191 1602 85 0 13

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 19
Liquor License Map: CHARLEY'S PLACE
4324 W THUNDERBIRD RD




Ü
Date: 9/25/2023
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 20



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Filibertos Mexican Food

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 256228.

Summary

Applicant
Julia Rubio, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
15602 N. 35th Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 29, 2023.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 21


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have managed restaurants with and with out a liquor licenses for over 15 years.
During the course of my employment I have been trained and attended classes
regaeding the liquor laws of the state of Arizona”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“A liquor license at our restaurant will allow us to prvide a safe family oriented
restaurant where families can eat together in a pleasant envornment. We wish to
provide alcholic beverages to our clients as a compliment to their meal.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Filibertos Mexican Food
Liquor License Map - Filibertos Mexican Food

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 22
Liquor License Data: FILIBERTOS MEXICAN FOOD
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 2

Restaurant 12 6 5


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 62.21 82.8 129.51

Violent Crimes 11.92 12.63 19.85

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 48 52

Total Violations 84 98




Page 23
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1041004 1847 89 14 9

1042022 2649 87 0 15

1042071 1972 85 6 5

1042072 1463 95 11 5

1042073 1396 8 4 34

1042262 1244 92 0 4

1042263 658 27 17 37

1042264 1538 92 7 15

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 24
Liquor License Map: FILIBERTOS MEXICAN FOOD
15602 N 35TH AVE




Ü
Date: 8/31/2023
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 25



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Turmeric Cash and Cary

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 255593.

Summary

Applicant
Anjal Nimma, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
1209 E. Bell Road
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 24, 2023.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Page 26

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am assured to uphold the laws and regulations about liquor license. I have never
been involved in any criminal activity, no record of getting in trouble with law and
authorities.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This store will provide a safe and secure place for the neighborhood to buy alcohol.
The location will be convenient for the people in neighborhood who may not have
access to transportation. Adding the long time experience of the owner with running a
store while upholding all the laws and regulations, the store will be a safe, secure and
convenience place for the customers to purchase quality alcohol.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Turmeric Cash and Cary
Liquor License Map - Turmeric Cash and Cary

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 27
Liquor License Data: TURMERIC CASH AND CARY
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 3

Liquor Store 9 5 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 4

Restaurant 12 24 6


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 62.21 161.04 161.35

Violent Crimes 11.92 20.96 28.76

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 48 31

Total Violations 84 56




Page 28
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1036063 2174 78 13 25

1036111 1396 66 14 3

1036112 1335 87 10 0

6191001 2198 0 11 23

6191002 617 22 45 19

6192001 1053 20 23 17

6192002 1223 0 15 29

6192003 2370 48 17 12

6194002 1484 18 18 8

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 29
Liquor License Map: TURMERIC CASH AND CARY
1209 E BELL RD




Ü
Date: 8/28/2023
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 30



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - La Pasadita Hot Dogs

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 255380.

Summary

Applicant
Rocio Rodriguez, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
3801 N. 43rd Ave.
Zoning Classification: Industrial Park
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow alcohol sales as an accessory use to a restaurant.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 30, 2023.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Page 31

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Over 23 years of being in business and dealing with customers and business in
general I have acquired the experience, responsibility, tenacity and skills required to
maintain our restaurants while expanding new markets. We endured through COVID
and are now looking to venture into offering beer to our patrons who repeatedly inquire
about it. We will still offer a safe environment to all our customers while providing the
same level of customer satisfaction we are known for.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We have been in business at this location for 5 years and will be maintaining the same
menu service and customer care. Due to customer demand, the only change will be
providing alcoholic beverages when requested along with their food. We commit to
abiding by strict measures to ensure only patrons who are legally allowed to drink can
do so.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - La Pasadita Hot Dogs
Liquor License Map - La Pasadita Hot Dogs

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - ARCO AM PM 42445

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 255894.

Summary

Applicant
Siv Dieb, AgentAri

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
7849 N. 43rd Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 22, 2023.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Page 36

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“ I am a respectable business owner in Phoenix since 2015. I am fully qualified
because my business is very successful and I don't have any complaints against my
business. So I am fully capable of all responsibilities that come with owning a liquor
license.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“ I am a qualified business owner for many years in the community. Also as a small
business owner running a convenience store, it brings equal competition to the
market.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - ARCO AM PM 42445
Liquor License Map - ARCO AM PM 42445

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 37
Liquor License Data: ARCO AM PM 42445
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 2

Restaurant 12 3 1



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 62.21 77.99 43.52

Violent Crimes 11.92 14.27 9.44
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 48 109

Total Violations 84 185




Page 38
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

0923094 666 94 0 10

0924021 1281 73 0 9

0924022 1194 32 12 17

1057012 2012 87 15 6

1057022 1187 68 22 7

1058001 1575 74 8 13

1058003 1156 78 20 11

1058004 2395 76 8 5

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 39
Liquor License Map: ARCO AM PM 42445
7849 N 43RD AVE




Ü
Date: 8/30/2023
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 40



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Childsplay Inc.

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Steven Dale Martin

Location
3515 E. Hialea Court
Council District: 6

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 4, 2023 - 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. / 150 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 41



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Keystone Montessori Charter School, Inc.

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Melissa Risinger-Sutton

Location
1025 E. Liberty Lane
Council District: 6

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 11, 2023 - 3 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 600 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 42



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - St. Benedict Roman Catholic Parish Phoenix

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Mary Jane Livens

Location
16035 S. 48th St.
Council District: 6

Function
Dinner and Dance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 3, 2023 - 5 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. / 200 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 43



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - St. Thomas the Apostle Roman Catholic Parish
Phoenix

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Steven Kunkel

Location
4510 N. 24th St.
Council District: 6

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 9, 2023 - 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. / 250 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 44



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - OHSO Brewery

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 255836.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 3 - Microbrewery

Location
2144 E. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-3
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a microbrewery. This location was
previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.
This location requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and outdoor alcohol
consumption.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 24, 2023.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.




Page 45

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“OHSO has several locations throughout the valley. We will continue to abide by
Arizona's Title 4 liquor laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location will be a production brewery and a neighborhood meeting place with
food and beverage for one and all. OHSO has an inviting space for families, singles
and all ages. It will also be the production brewery for our outside sales locations,
including, but not limited to Safeway, Camelback Inn, W Hotel and our sister
restaurants and a few more.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - OHSO Brewery
Liquor License Map - OHSO Brewery

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Central Arts Alliance

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Sandra Bassett

Location
1202 N. 3rd St.
Council District: 7

Function
Art Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Dec. 9, 2023 - 11 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. / 1000 attendees
Dec. 10, 2023 - 11 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. / 750 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 50



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Phoenix Community Alliance, Inc.

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Devney Majerle

Location
1202 N. 3rd St
Council District: 7

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 11, 2023 - 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. / 3,000 attendees
Nov. 12, 2023 - 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. / 3,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 51



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Downtown Spirits

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 09070587.

Summary

Applicant
Jared Repinski, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
1340 Grand Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-3 ACOD
Council District: 7

This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a liquor store. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 27, 2023.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the


Page 52

applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been representing liquor licensed establishments in Arizona for over 15 years.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Tourism plays an important role in our local economy and liquor licensed
establishments (the sale of alcohol) is a very important aspect of tourism. Therefore, if
the City of Phoenix continues to lead the State of Arizona by approving quality and
diverse businesses (restaurants, bars, microbreweries, distilleries, hotels, resorts, golf
courses, special events, convenience / grocery stores & gas stations) similar to this
proposed liquor licensed business, all businesses will prosper.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Downtown Spirits
Liquor License Map - Downtown Spirits

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - La Estacion Mex Kitchen

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 255429.

Summary

Applicant
Theresa Morse, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
906 N. 15th Ave. #B
Zoning Classification: C-3
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 24, 2023.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 57


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have 6 years of experience in the liquor industry as I worked for the Scottsdale Plaza
Resort. Many people believe that this resort is without disorderly people or people that
are not intoxicated. I have had to deal with many guests at the location who needed to
be removed from the premises and on some occasions required intervention of law
enforcement. My experience at the Scottsdale Plaza resort has prepared me for
operating this restaurant in Phoenix. The customers have been extremely polite.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Customers from the community patronize the restaurant or call for 'ubereats' and
other delivery services to have food delivered. I am aware that I am not allowed to sell
any alcoholic beverages to go. The community has been very supportive and are
happy to have a restaurant within walking distance from their homes. I believe the
restaurant will be an asset to the neighborhood.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - La Estacion Mex Kitchen
Liquor License Map - La Estacion Mex Kitchen

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 58
Liquor License Data: LA ESTACION MEX KITCHEN
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 3 1

Government 5 3 0

Bar 6 14 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 1

Liquor Store 9 1 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 2

Restaurant 12 32 7

Club 14 1 0



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 62.89 159.42 145.75

Violent Crimes 12.05 51.4 40.02

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 47 198

Total Violations 82 364




Page 59
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1129001 1670 70 4 19

1129002 815 37 22 24

1129003 1372 4 18 40

1129004 1325 47 24 52

1143011 1389 22 15 57

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 60
Liquor License Map: LA ESTACION MEX KITCHEN
906 N 15TH AVE




Ü
Date: 9/25/2023
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 61



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Artist Relief Fund, Inc.

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Jillian Barrell

Location
2835 E. Washington St.
Council District: 8

Function
Performance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 4, 2023 - 6 p.m. to 11:30p.m. / 350 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 62



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Children's Museum of Phoenix

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Kelley Ames Fitzsimmons

Location
215 N. 7th St.
Council District: 8

Function
Annual Gala

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 4, 2023 - 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. / 400 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 63



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Girl Scouts - Arizona Cactus - Pine Council, Inc.

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Alycia I. Elfstrom

Location
1611 E. Dobbins Road
Council District: 8

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 4, 2023 - 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 650 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 64



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - State Forty Eight Foundation

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Elizabeth Mok

Location
113 N. 6th St.
Council District: 8

Function
Community Celebration

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
Nov. 3, 2023 - 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. / 250 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 65



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Grab N Go 909

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 256416.

Summary

Applicant
Rajkamal Gill, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
8802 S. Central Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenient store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 31, 2023.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Page 66

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I bought business and I am a responsible citizen.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Conveinence, neighborhood store.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Grab N Go 909
Liquor License Map - Grab N Go 909

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Urban Bricks Kitchen

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 255923.

Summary

Applicant
Anthony Pomykala, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4750 S. 48th St., Ste. 107
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is Oct. 29, 2023.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 71


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We train all employees in responsible liquor sales. I personally am not a drinker
myself, neither are my partners, but we respect the casual drinker enhancing their
dining experience with an alcoholic beverage.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Many diners enjoy a casual experience that includes a sage environment to relax in,
while enjoying a refreshing alcoholic beverage with their meal.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Urban Bricks Kitchen
Liquor License Map - Urban Bricks Kitchen

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 72
Liquor License Data: URBAN BRICKS KITCHEN
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 2 0

Bar 6 1 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 2

Liquor Store 9 2 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 2

Hotel 11 3 1

Restaurant 12 4 3


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 62.21 40.31 61.88

Violent Crimes 11.92 8.89 15.81

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 48 72

Total Violations 84 122




Page 73
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1152001 1118 13 16 58

1152003 546 8 44 45

1162041 1426 79 6 24

1162042 1819 57 0 32

1162043 535 59 24 8

3197041 1777 42 9 20

Average 0 61 13 19




Page 74
Liquor License Map: URBAN BRICKS KITCHEN
4750 S 48TH ST




Ü
Date: 8/30/2023
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 75



PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-50234) (Items 25-27)
Ordinance S-50234 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of paying
vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing additional
payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This section also
requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts indicated below, for
the following contracts, contract extensions and/or bids awarded. As
indicated below, some items below require payment pursuant to Phoenix
City Code Section 42-13.

25 Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power
District, dba SRP
For $76,707.52 in payment authority for SRP crews to remove one area
light, install 155 feet of 6DX, and connect and install 12 streetlights on
existing SRP poles for Grand Canalscape streetlights along Turney
Avenue from 19th to 15th avenues, SRP intersection T3164199, Street
Transportation Department Project ST85160026; and for SRP crews to
energize 23 streetlights and de-energize 15 streetlights at SRP
intersection T1264752, along Lower Buckeye Road from 51st to 43rd
avenues for Street Transportation Department Project ST85100249.



26 Professional Towing and Recovery, LLC
For $186,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered into on or
about Nov. 1, 2023, for a term of five years for Towing Services for Slurry
Seal and Fractured Aggregate Surface Treatment (FAST) programs for
the Street Transportation Department. The department requires a contract
for all labor, equipment, materials, and transportation necessary to provide
towing services for the City of Phoenix's Slurry Seal and FAST programs
to move unanticipated vehicles in a timely fashion as the crews come
through.




Page 76


27 Settlement of Claim(s) O'Connell v. City of Phoenix
To make payment of up to $101,687 in settlement of claim(s) in O'Connell
v. City of Phoenix, 22-0448, GL, PD, for the Finance Department pursuant
to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of a claim involving
the Water Services Department that occurred on Oct. 17, 2022.




Page 77



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Print and Mail Election Materials - IFB 19-046 - Amendment (Ordinance S-50273)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 149011 with Courier Graphics Corp. to extend contract term and add
additional expenditures. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $1,171,000.

Summary
This contract will provide print and mailing of election materials for the November 2023
election and future elections through the term of the contract. The City is required by
law to mail publicity pamphlets to households, with at least one registered voter, before
ballots are mailed for each election.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through Nov. 30, 2024 with the option to
extend through Nov. 30, 2025.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $1,171,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $1,741,000. Funds are available in the City Clerk
Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Print and Mail Election Materials Contract 149011 (Ordinance S-45214) on Dec. 5,
2018.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 78



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acquisition of Real Property for Roadway Improvements Along 56th Street from
Thomas to Camelback Roads (Ordinance S-50235)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire all real property
and related property interests required by donation, purchase within the City's
appraised value, or by the power of eminent domain for roadway improvements along
56th Street, from Thomas to Camelback roads. Further request to authorize dedication
of land with roadway and/or public improvements to public use for right-of-way
purposes via separate recording instrument. Additionally, request authorization for the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
Acquisition of real property is required to accommodate roadway improvements along
56th Street, from Thomas to Camelback roads. The roadway improvements will
complete pedestrian and bicycle gaps along the corridor and will enhance the safety of
pedestrians and bicyclists. Improvements will include upgraded lighting, storm drain,
landscaping, traffic signals, and Americans with Disabilities Act compliant sidewalks
and ramps.

The properties impacted by this project are identified in Attachment A.

Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget using Arizona Highway User Revenue Funds.

Location
Along 56th Street from Thomas to Camelback roads
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson, and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.




Page 79
ATTACHMENT A
Property Identification

Acquisition of Real Property for the Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Project
located along 56th Street between Thomas and Camelback Roads

The following improved and/or unimproved parcels affected by acquisition and
included in this request are identified by the Maricopa County Assessor’s parcel
number (APN) and the address or location.

APN Address / Location
126-24-346 5525 E. Thomas Road
128-10-022A 5502 E. Osborn Road
128-10-022B 5549 E. Indian School Road
128-10-043A 3608 N. 56th St.
128-10-044B 3602 N. 56th St.
128-13-001A 3820 N. 56th St.
128-13-002A 3808 N. 56th St.
128-13-096 5529 E. Lafayette Blvd.
128-13-097B 5528 E. Calle Tuberia
128-13-102B 5529 E. Calle Tuberia
128-25-118 5545 E. Earll Drive
128-26-038A 5542 E. Flower St.
128-26-058 3102 N. 56th St.
128-37-001A 5602 E. Thomas Road
128-37-024 3020 N. Valencia Lane
128-37-025 3015 N. 56th St.
128-37-026 3007 N. 56th St.
128-37-027 3001 N. 56th St.
128-37-033 5656 E. Orange Blossom Lane
128-37-043 3031 N. 56th St.
128-39-017 3310 N. Valencia Lane
128-39-018 3304 N. Valencia Lane
128-39-027 3131 N. 56th St.
128-39-028 3119 N. 56th St.
128-39-029 3112 N. Valencia Lane
128-39-030 3107 N. 56th St.
128-39-031 3101 N. 56th St.

Page 80
APN Address / Location
128-40-010A 3433 N. 56th St.
128-40-014A 3409 N. 56th St.
128-40-015A 3402 N. Valencia Lane
128-40-037D 3647 N. 56th St.
128-40-037E 3641 N. 56th St.
129-28-071A 5601 E. Thomas Road
172-23-014 4504 N. 56th St.
172-24-019C 4505 N. 56th St.
172-31-039 4485 N. 56th St.
172-31-041 4445 N. 56th St.
172-31-042 4455 N. 56th St.
172-32-008 5539 E. Camelback Road
172-41-025 4202 N. 56th St.
172-41-028 5555 E. Monterosa St.
172-42-047D 4225 N. 56th St.
Unassigned SRP Canal at 56th Street and Indian School Road




Page 81



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend Lease with Bio-Medical Applications of Arizona, LLC, to
Extend Term (Ordinance S-50237)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Lease 130171 with
Bio-Medical Applications of Arizona, LLC, to extend lease term for one year, with two
additional, one-year options to extend. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer
to accept all funds related to this item.

Summary
Bio-Medical Applications of Arizona, LLC (Bio-Medical), leases approximately 10,350
square feet of City-owned space located at 1957 W. Dunlap Ave., Suite 6. The space
is utilized as an outpatient dialysis facility and general office. The term of the lease
expires Nov. 30, 2023. The lease will be amended to extend the term for one year
beginning Dec. 1, 2023, through Nov. 30, 2024, and provide for two additional, one-
year options to extend. Base rent during the one-year extension is $12,506.25 per
month, plus applicable taxes, which is within the range of market rents as determined
by the Real Estate Division. Base rent will be adjusted three percent at the beginning
of each option period.

All other terms and conditions will remain the same. Bio-Medical is a long-term tenant
in good standing.

Contract Term
The term of the lease will be extended for one year, with two additional, one-year
options to extend.

Financial Impact
Revenue during the first year of the extended term will be $150,075, plus applicable
taxes.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Lease 130171-001 through 130171-006, authorized by Ordinance S-37261 on July 7,
2010.




Page 82

Location
1957 W. Dunlap Ave., Suite 6.
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, and the Public Transit
and Finance departments.




Page 83



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Playground Fitness and Related Equipment Contract - COOP 24-0031 Request
for Award (Ordinance S-50248)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the use of Sourcewell
cooperative contracts with Landscape Structures, Inc. and Miracle Recreation
Equipment Company d.b.a PlayPower, Inc. to provide a wide range of playground
fitness and related equipment, accessories and services for the Parks and Recreation
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $6,000,000.

Summary
These contracts will support efforts to repair and replace current playground and
outdoor fitness equipment throughout the City. The existing playground equipment is at
the end of its lifecycle and these contracts will ensure the department can purchase a
wide variety of new equipment. The purchase of playground equipment will enhance
and support the quality of recreational programs and services provided to the residents
of Phoenix. The playground equipment and accessories will be used in various park
locations throughout the City. This contract will also be utilized for Parks and
Recreation capital improvements serving qualifying census tracts as approved by the
funding being requested is to be used on ARPA projects.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reasons:
Special Circumstances Alternative Competition. The City of Phoenix is a member of
Sourcewell cooperative and these contracts were awarded through the competitive
process, consistent with the City's procurement process, as set forth in the Phoenix
City Code, Chapter 43. Utilization of this agreement allows the City to benefit from
national government pricing and volume discounts.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about Oct. 18, 2023 for a five-year term with no options
to extend.



Page 84

Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts value will not exceed $6,000,000 for the five-year aggregate
term. Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's Operating and
Capital Improvement Program budget; and through the City's allocation of the ARPA
received from the federal government and is under the Phoenix Parks Improvements
program of the strategic plan.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson, and the Parks and
Recreation and Finance departments.




Page 85



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Ready Mix Concrete- IFB 18-264 - Letter of Agreement to Extend Contract for
Concrete Supply with Cemex Construction Material South (Ordinance S-50249)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into Letter of
Agreement with Cemex, Inc., dba Cemex Construction Materials South, to continue to
provide Ready Mix Concrete to various City departments. $270,000 in funds are
needed, in addition to the $2,024,080 previously approved via Ordinance S-44837.
The aggregate value will not exceed $2,294,080. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The purpose of this Letter of Agreement is to continue to provide a wide variety of
ready mix concrete materials to City departments, including the Aviation, Parks and
Recreation, Street Transportation, and Water Services departments. This contract is
necessary for maintenance and upkeep of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, concrete
pavements, slabs and construction projects throughout the City.

The Letter of Agreement is required to provide the various City departments these
services until June 30, 2024.

Contract Term
The term of the Letter of Agreement will begin on or about Oct. 19, 2023, and expire
on June 30, 2024.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $270,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $2,294,080. Funding is available in various department
budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Ready Mix Concrete Contract 148122 (Ordinance S-44837) on June 27, 2018.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.


Page 86



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance and Dedication of an Easement for Public Utility Purposes
(Ordinance S-50252)

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate of an easement for public utility
purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: Phoenix Plaza 75, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 7307 W. Indian School Road
File: FN 230081
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.




Page 87



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of an Easement for Drainage Purposes (Ordinance S-50258)

Request for the City Council to accept an easement for drainage purposes; further
ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: TJH Arizona Series, LLC, Series A, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 5124, 5128, 5132, 5136 and 5140 N. 10th Way
File: FN 230017
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson, and the Planning
and Development and Finance departments.




Page 88



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Bicycles, Parts, Accessories, Repair and Maintenance - IFB 18-174 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-50264)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 148637 with Landis Cyclery, Inc., to extend the contract term and add
additional expenditures. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $80,000.

Summary
This contract will provide the City's essential workers with bicycles, parts, accessories
and repair, and maintenance services to ensure that bicycles are in optimal working
condition for the safety of employees who use bicycles in performance of daily
responsibilities. The main users of this contract are the City Clerk, Police, and Phoenix
Convention Center departments.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through Oct. 31, 2024, with an option to
extend through Oct. 31, 2025.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $80,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $246,000. Funds are available in various department budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Bicycles, Parts, Accessories, Repair and Maintenance Contract 148637 (Ordinance S
-45023) Oct. 3, 2018;
• Bicycles, Parts, Accessories, Repair and Maintenance Contract 148637 (Ordinance S
-49124) Nov. 2, 2022.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 89



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Industrial-Commercial Doors Service and Supply - IFB 18-205 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-50270)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contracts 148635 with D.H. Pace Company, Inc., and 148636 with Miner, LTD, to
extend contract term. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. No additional funds are needed, request to continue using
Ordinance S-45068.

Summary
This contract will provide the City of Phoenix with equipment, labor and materials to
perform all operations necessary to implement a preventative maintenance program,
as-needed repairs, and replace existing door systems, as necessary, to approximately
800 industrial-commercial doors for Citywide buildings/facilities protection and security.
The extension will allow for the continuation of the maintenance and repair for these
doors.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through April 30, 2024.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $5,078,000 and no additional
funds are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Industrial-Commercial Doors Service and Supply Citywide Contract 148635 and
148636 (Ordinance S-45068) on Oct. 17, 2018;
· Industrial-Commercial Doors Service and Supply Citywide Contract 148635 and
148636 (Ordinance S-48236) on Jan. 5, 2022.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 90



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Maintenance Repair and Operating Supplies and Services - 16154RFP -
Amendment (Ordinance S-50274)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 146367 with HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, to extend contract term. No
additional funds are needed, request to continue using Ordinance S-43967.

Summary
This contract will provide maintenance, repair and operating supplies and related
services. The contract is available for Citywide use and primary users of this contract
are the Housing, Parks and Recreation, Fire, Public Works, and Water Services
departments.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through Oct. 31, 2024.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $4,500,000 and no additional
funds are needed.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.




Page 91



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Affordable Care Act (ACA) Reporting Services RFP HR 22-018 - Request for
Award (Ordinance S-50241)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
UnifyHR, LLC to manage and monitor the Affordable Care Act (ACA) compliance for
the Human Resources Department. Further authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $450,000.

Summary
This contract is needed to manage and monitor ACA compliance for the City and
comply with ACA reporting requirements. The ACA mandates employers with more
than 50 full-time employees to track medical plan coverage for employees meeting the
30-hour-per-week test, report plan of affordability based on employee-rate-of-pay, and
prepare and issue the "medical W-2" (Form 1095c) to all employees annually.
Penalties assessed by the IRS for non-compliance are $2,320 per year, per eligible
employee or more than $20 million per year for the City.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10.

Two vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An evaluation
committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria with a
maximum possible point total of 1,000:
· Qualifications and Experience (0-300 points)
· Method of Approach (0 - 400 points)
· Price (0-300 points)

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends an award to
UnifyHR, LLC.
· UnifyHR: 910 points


Page 92

· BenefitScape: 841 points

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Nov. 1, 2023, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $450,000.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Human Resources
Department.




Page 93



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Enterprise License Agreement for GIS Mapping - Amendment (Ordinance S-
50245)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 148203 with Environmental Systems Research Institute to provide additional
contract term and funding for the Geographic Information Systems Mapping Enterprise
License Agreement for Information Technology Services Department in support of
various departments. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $7,015,000.

Summary
The Contract 148203 with Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) provides
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software Enterprise License Agreement (ELA)
and professional services under the ESRI Enterprise Advantage program used by the
Information Technology Services, Aviation, Fire, Police, Street Transportation, Planning
& Development, Water Services, Public Transit, and other offices and departments.
This contract provides benefits, value, and substantial cost savings to City
departments. These benefits include: a lower cost-per-unit for licensed software,
substantially reduced administrative and procurement expenses, premium support and
software maintenance, and provide the flexibility to deploy software and professional
services when and where needed.

The ELA provides City GIS users with unlimited access to ESRI products identified in
the agreement, including maintenance on all software for the term of the agreement.
The ability to utilize this contract allows Information Technology Services Department
to support departmental engagements, and obtain professional services, which will
help avoid disruption to critical projects and initiatives. ESRI software products are
currently used in public facing applications which includes the City Manager’s
Dashboard and Open Data site. ESRI professional services are being used to assist
departments with their GIS product creation and business operations.

The ESRI Enterprise Advantage program provide professional services to accomplish
the identified department GIS project goals that are currently underway and planned.
Departments are empowered to generate applications, maps, dashboards, field
location awareness, and then manage this geospatial content, hosted by the


Page 94

Information Technology Services Department. Engagements currently underway or
upcoming include: Water Services' Utility Network (UN) Planning, Analysis and
Implementation, Aviation airfield inspections, Street Transportation’s maintenance of
centerlines and monumentation, Police compliance and oversight dashboard, and
Phase II City Manager’s Performance Dashboard, Neighborhood Services Tidemark
updates, Parks and Recreation archaeology mapping, Environmental Programs water
project mapping, and many more.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through July 27, 2027.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $7,015,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $11,105,450. Funds are available in the various department’s
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Enterprise License Agreement for GIS Mapping Contract 148203 (Ordinance S-
44741) on June 6, 2018;
• Enterprise License Agreement for GIS Mapping Contract 148203 amendment
(Ordinance S-47794) on July 1, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Information
Technology Services Department.




Page 95



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend and Extend Contract for Fiscal Monitoring Services
(Ordinance S-50251)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Contract 149307
with PUN Group, LLP (PUN Group) to extend the term for an additional year,
beginning on or about Dec. 15, 2023 and ending Dec. 31, 2024, and approve funding
for this vendor to continue to provide contracted services through the extended term.
The contract value will not exceed $200,000 during the extension period. Further
request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item for
the life of the contract. Funds are available from Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act, Head Start, and General Funds.

Summary
PUN Group conducts annual fiscal monitoring of subcontractors accountable to the
City to facilitate the Human Services Department programs. These fiscal monitoring
activities are required to comply with grant stipulations, including the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act, Head Start, Victim Services, and Homeless Services
programs. The Request for Proposals process can take up to six months to complete,
and this extension will allow the Human Services Department staff sufficient time to
conduct the procurement process.

Contract Term
The extended contract term will begin on or about Dec. 15, 2023 and run through Dec.
31, 2024.

Financial Impact
Expenditures will not exceed $200,000 during the extension period of the contract.
Funds are available from Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, Head Start, and
General Funds.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· On Nov. 8, 2018, the Phoenix Business and Workforce Development Board
approved the Workforce Development funding Program funding portion of this
contract.



Page 96

· On Dec. 12, 2018, City Council approved staff entering into contract with PUN
Group with Ordinance S-45232.
· On Jan. 26, 2022, City Council approved additional funding for Contract 149307
with Ordinance S-48269.
· On Jan. 25, 2023, City Council approved additional funding for Contract 149307
with Ordinance S-49362.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.




Page 97



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
2024-25 Housing and Urban Development Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan
Process

This report requests City Council approval of the 2024-25 Consolidated Plan Annual
Action Plan process.

Summary
The 2024-25 Annual Action Plan examines housing and community development
needs in the City of Phoenix and defines strategies for addressing those needs
throughout the year. The Annual Action Plan contains the planning and application
requirements for four major U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) programs that provide critical funds to entitlement cities like Phoenix every year.
The four fund sources are: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME
Investment Partnership (HOME), Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), and Housing
Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA). Through adoption of the 2020-24
Consolidated Plan in May 2020, the City Council approved the general priorities and
plans for these programs. Each year the Annual Action Plan details how federal funds
will be spent during the coming year.

The Annual Action Plan process began in September 2023. The initial public
communication and participation process will include the distribution of a community
survey, social media posts and outreach, and a HUD-required public in-person
hearing, all to assess community needs throughout Phoenix. Residents and
neighborhood leaders will be invited to provide testimony regarding housing,
homelessness, social services, and community development issues and concerns.
Residents who are unable to attend the in-person public hearing will have the
opportunity to submit their comments via email or voicemail. This information, along
with a needs assessment, will form the foundation of the draft 2024-25 Annual Action
Plan. The draft plan will be available for an advertised 30-day public comment period
and another public hearing will be held in spring 2024 before it is reviewed and
approved by the City Council. The goal of the Annual Action Plan process, per HUD
requirements, is to ensure comprehensive community planning and coordinated
service delivery are utilized to meet critical housing and community development
needs. The City Council will be asked to review and approve the draft 2024-25 Annual
Action Plan in early May 2024 before it is due to HUD by May 15, 2024.


Page 98


Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Economic Development and Housing Subcommittee recommended approval of
this item on Oct. 11, 2023, by a 4-0 vote.

Public Outreach
The City of Phoenix's Annual Action Plan process will include holding two HUD
required in-person public hearings with the notice of public hearings posted two weeks
in advance.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Neighborhood
Services, Human Services, and Housing departments.




Page 99



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Purchase of Golf Merchandise for Direct Resale to the Public (Ordinance S-
50262)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to purchase various golf
merchandise for direct resale to the public at pro shops located at Cave Creek,
Encanto, Palo Verde and Aguila golf courses. Items may include, but are not limited to;
protective gear, golf balls, range balls, golf clothing, hats, golf clubs and golf shoes.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The two-year aggregate value will not exceed $1.2 million, with an estimated
annual expenditure of $600,000. There is no impact to the General Fund. Revenue
from the resale of merchandise at the pro shops fund the expenditure request.

Summary
The City operates five municipal golf courses, four of which has a pro shop where
golfers have the ability to purchase golf merchandise such as golf balls, clothing and
shoes. To supply the pro shops, the Parks and Recreation Department purchases
merchandise for resale directly from more than 190 various wholesale and specialty
manufacturers to obtain discounts and the lowest prices. Vendor pricing is based on a
variety of factors and changes seasonally; therefore, a low-bid process is not suitable
for the purchase of golf merchandise.

Financial Impact
Payment authority in the amount of $1.2 million for a two-year period, from Sept. 8,
2023, through Sept. 7, 2025, is requested. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Revenue from the resale of merchandise at the pro shops funds the Parks and
Recreation Department's purchase of golf merchandise.

Location
Cave Creek Golf Course - 15202 N. 19th Ave.
Encanto Golf Course - 2775 N. 15th Ave.
Palo Verde Golf Course - 6215 N. 15th Ave.
Aguila Golf Course - 8440 S. 35th Ave.
Council Districts: 3, 4, 5 and 7




Page 100

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.




Page 101



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Bioscience Healthcare Strategic Initiative (Ordinance S-
50239)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to implement the Fiscal Year
(FY) 2023-24 Bioscience Healthcare Strategic Initiative, including authorization of an
Arizona Bioindustry Association (AZBio) membership for FY 2024-25 and participation
at the annual BIO International Convention in 2024. Further request to authorize the
City Treasurer to accept funds from the City's BIO International Convention partners to
offset costs associated with the 2024 Convention expenses, and for the City Controller
to disburse funds associated with this request to future identified convention vendors.
Funding for the AZBio membership and convention efforts will not exceed $110,000.
There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available in the Genomics
Facilities and Operations Fund.

Summary
Phoenix has grown to be a hub of bioscience activity in the Southwestern U.S. CBRE,
a national commercial real estate firm, ranked Phoenix fifth in the nation as an
Emerging Life Science Market in their 2020 annual U.S. Life Science Report and first
for Life Science Job Growth in Emerging Life Science Markets in their 2021 report.
Much of this success is due to Phoenix’s world-class medical centers, innovative
research institutions, pro-business environment, a growing educated population,
dedicated universities and community colleges, and spirit of entrepreneurship. In order
to build upon these strengths, staff is continuing to implement a strategic plan
introduced in 2018 designed to grow, strengthen and sustain a healthy bioscience
industry. Since the launch of this effort, there has been an acceleration of investment
and growth in the bioscience industry in Phoenix. By the end of 2022, more than $4
billion will have been invested in new and expanded bioscience and healthcare
facilities, and more than 6 million square feet of primary facility space for discovery,
development and care delivery creating more than 10,000 jobs for Phoenix residents.

Staff has focused its economic development efforts in the areas of research,
development, precision medicine, healthcare delivery, health-tech and education.
Focusing on these areas strengthens and solidifies Phoenix as a leader in the nation’s
bioscience healthcare industry. The Community and Economic Development
Department (CEDD) will continue to ensure there is a world-class real estate inventory


Page 102

that meets the unique needs of bioscience companies. This commitment includes
support of the downtown Phoenix Bioscience Core (PBC), Mayo Clinic’s Discovery
Oasis, the Phoenix Medical Quarter in addition to other submarkets within the City.
Specifically, CEDD has been working closely with Arizona State University (ASU) and
its development partner, Wexford Science & Technology, to bring prospective tenants
to the first phase development on the PBC north of Fillmore Street, the 850 PBC
building. In the 850 PBC building, ASU is a major tenant in the building along with the
expansion of the Center for Entrepreneurial Innovation with its new LabForce program
to train individuals with the skills needed to work in a lab setting. Other tenants within
the new building include bioscience companies and a co-working accelerator lab
supporting the growth of early-stage companies and creating new, quality jobs in
Phoenix.

In order to maintain the City's position in the bioindustry, CEDD is requesting to
continue the City's annual membership with the AZBio, the only statewide organization
exclusively focused on building Arizona’s bioindustry. AZBio is committed to building a
top-tier life science industry in Arizona and is a critical partner for Phoenix. As
specialists, AZBio provides industry insight, programs specifically designed for life
science organizations, visibility into investment opportunities, and a voice for the
industry in the media, across the community, and with elected leaders and government
agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. The AZBio annual membership cost is
$15,000 for FY 2024-25.

Another key effort is the promotion of Phoenix's bioscience efforts nationally and
internationally by attending the 2024 BIO International Convention to be held in San
Diego. The 2023 BIO Convention was held in Boston, with more than 20,000
attendees and 73 countries represented. As a sponsor of Start- Up Stadium, the City of
Phoenix was able to kick off one of the pitch days at the event this year and nominate
three Phoenix-based companies that were selected as finalists. These three early-
stage companies were able to engage with key members of the investment
community, venture philanthropy groups, and BIO attendees. This year’s Phoenix
delegation included 52 attendees, representing 31 Phoenix companies and
organizations. The delegation held more than 300 productive meetings along with
continuous engagement with BIO conference attendees in the Phoenix Pavilion. More
than 150 people attended this year’s Rapid Fire, Fireside Chat featuring 15 Phoenix
life science leaders sharing their innovations with the audience. Attendance at the
event provided valuable networking and partnership opportunities and synergy with the
City's attending partners looking to promote their research and products to a global
audience. The knowledge and contacts generated by attending this convention will be
used in communicating the City's competitive advantage, existing ecosystem and
resources in Phoenix to attract and grow companies in this industry to thrive and


Page 103

generate quality jobs for the community.

Planning is currently underway, subject to City Council authorization of funding, for the
2024 BIO Convention. Preliminary estimates for participation such as sponsorships,
advertising, equipment, and shipping costs total approximately $95,000. Staff will also
work with industry partners, such as the University of Arizona, ASU, and the
Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) to co-locate at the convention. This
shared effort may allow the City to reduce its costs and boost visibility while assisting
its partners in promoting Phoenix.

These continued efforts enable CEDD staff to showcase Phoenix's citywide assets and
ensure success of future projects. CEDD and its partners continue to generate
qualified prospects to create a pipeline of businesses considering expansions and/or
relocations to Phoenix through a multi-faceted marketing approach targeted at this
industry. Phoenix's involvement and partnership with AZBio and the BIO International
Convention elevates the City's visibility as a hub for bioscience, building a critical mass
of bioscience and healthcare-related companies and attracting and developing top
talent vital to sustain the long-term growth of this thriving industry. As the convention
vendors are currently unknown to staff, the vendors will be identified when the
information is released by the convention .

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding for the AZBio membership and to
participate in BIO International 2024 will not exceed $110,000 total for both efforts.
Funding is available in the Genomic Facilities and Operations Fund. Funding received
from the City's BIO International Convention partners shall reimburse the Genomic
Facilities and Operations Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Economic Development and Housing
Subcommittee at the Sept. 13, 2023 meeting by a vote of 4-0.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.




Page 104



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Kiva Hub and Better Business Bureau Serving the Pacific Southwest
Premier Partnership Sponsorship Contract (Ordinance S-50261)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract as a
Premier Partnership sponsor of the Phoenix Kiva Hub administered by the Better
Business Bureau Serving the Pacific Southwest (BBB) for a three-year total amount
not to exceed $100,000. Further request the City Controller to disburse all funds
associated with this item. Funding is available in the Community and Economic
Development Department's budget.

Summary
Kiva Inc. launched in 2005 as the world's first personal lending website. Because of
Kiva, the opportunity for small businesses and entrepreneurs to have affordable and
equitable access to financial products and services that help them chase their dreams
became an achievable reality. Kiva allows everyday people to pool lending
contributions in as little as $25 increments to provide financial access to entrepreneurs
in communities that are underserved and underrepresented within traditional lending
spaces. This is done through crowdfunded micro-loans from $1,000 to $15,000 for
start-ups and entrepreneurs with a zero percent interest rate and a guaranteed $0 in
fees. There are no minimum credit or cash flow document requirements to qualify,
which further helps remove a barrier to entry that limits affordable and equitable
financial access.

In 2021, with the financial support of the City and GoDaddy.com, the BBB launched
the Phoenix Kiva Hub and began crowdfunding microloans focused on women and
minority entrepreneurs who would otherwise not qualify for a traditional or low interest
loan to start their businesses. While the Phoenix Kiva Hub services all of Maricopa
County, the results within Phoenix have been impactful:
· 19 - Phoenix Loans Funded (12 outside Phoenix)
· $132,500 - Disbursed to Phoenix entrepreneurs ($66,000 outside Phoenix)
· $6,974 - Average Loan Size ($6,266 outside Phoenix)

The Phoenix Kiva Hub’s focus on women and minority entrepreneurs has been
impactful based on the 19 loans funded between Feb. 2020 and April 2023 to Phoenix
entrepreneurs:


Page 105

· 14 Credit scores below 650 (most bank loans require scores between 680-720)
· 17 Women-Owned Businesses
· 15 Minority-Owned Businesses
· 9 Black-Owned Businesses
· 3 Latino or Hispanic Owned Businesses
· 1 Native American, Asian or Pacific Islander-Owner Business

If approved, the City’s new Premier Partner Sponsorship will continue to pay for the
annual licensing fee associated with hosting the Phoenix Kiva Hub, which includes a
ten percent administration fee. The City will be recognized as the title program
partner/trustee in all branded materials, digital products and media mentions alongside
the BBB and GoDaddy.com (also a Premiere sponsor).

Phoenix Kiva Hub will provide a biannual report to City staff that will include the
following items:
· Demographic data of Kiva loan portfolio
· Average credit score of borrowers,
· Repayment rate
· Total number of loans
· Borrower related data by zip code
· Success stories
· Marketing: Impact (clicks, views, etc.) and traffic to Kiva landing page
· Events, webinars, and networking opportunity tracking

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about March 1, 2024 for a three-year term.

Financial Impact
The total sponsorship contract will not exceed $100,000. Funding is available in the
Community and Economic Development Department's General Fund budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Item approved unanimously at Economic Development and Housing Subcommittee
Meeting on Sept. 13, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.



Page 106



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
2024 Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services District Budget, Assessments and
Set Public Hearing Date (Resolution 22158)

Request City Council approval of the 2024 Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services
District (Downtown EMSD) proposed budget, assessments on the Downtown EMSD,
and set the date of Nov. 15, 2023, for the Public Hearing on the estimated
assessments, pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) 48-575. The General
Fund estimated annual expenditure for this program is $439,123.

Summary
The City Council authorized the formation of the Downtown EMSD in 1990 to provide
enhanced public services, above and beyond the level of services provided in the
remainder of the City. The costs for the Downtown EMSD’s services are paid through
assessments on property owners within the Downtown EMSD boundaries. The City
contracts directly with Downtown Phoenix, Inc. (DPI) to implement the work program,
as described in Attachment A, of the Downtown EMSD. The Downtown EMSD is
generally bounded by Fillmore Street, 7th Street, 3rd Avenue and the railroad tracks
south of Jackson Street.

2024 Downtown EMSD Proposed Budget
The work plan and budget for calendar year (CY) 2024 provides a variety of enhanced
services in the Downtown core, including business improvement services and overall
business development.

In May 2023, the Downtown EMSD Board of Directors, which includes representatives
of the City and other Downtown EMSD property owners, approved the proposed 2024
Downtown EMSD budget of $4,706,256. See Attachment B for the breakdown of the
expense categories. This includes $167,222 for streetscape maintenance expenses,
which are paid only by property owners and tenants adjacent to the Streetscape
Improvement District. The Streetscape Improvement District includes certain portions
of Monroe Street from 3rd Avenue to 7th Street; Adams Street from 2nd Avenue to 2nd
Street; 2nd Street from Jefferson to Van Buren streets; and 3rd Street from Monroe to
Van Buren streets.

The proposed CY 2024 assessment revenue of $4,556,256 represents no change over


Page 107

the CY 2023 assessments. The CY 2024 assessments for the Downtown EMSD will
be levied after the required Downtown EMSD approval process has been completed.
Assessments are determined in proportion to the benefits received by each parcel.
The proposed assessments and 2024 Downtown EMSD Diagram are based on the
estimate of expenses and property data available as of April 27, 2022.
· Estimated CY 2024 District Budget: $4,706,256
· Estimated CY 2024 Assessment Revenue: $4,556,256
· Estimated CY 2024 Non-assessment Revenue: $150,000

Public Hearing Date
It is requested that the City Council set the date of Nov. 15, 2023, as the date for the
Public Hearing on the 2024 Downtown EMSD assessments.

Financial Impact
The City's total estimated annual expenditure for this program is $1,497,935, which
includes:
· $439,123 from the General Fund (approximate $15 increase from 2023);
· $626,579 from the Phoenix Convention Center;
· $150,123 from the Sports Facilities Fund;
· $10,486 from the Phoenix Bioscience Core; and
· $271,623 from collections from tenants on City-owned properties

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Economic Development and Housing Subcommittee meeting approved the 2024
Downtown EMSD work plan and budget on Oct. 11, 2023, by a vote of 4-0.

Public Outreach
A Public Hearing will be held for property owners to discuss the proposed
assessments, costs, and services provided in connection with the Downtown EMSD. If
approved, the public hearing would be set for Nov. 15, 2023, at 2:30 p.m., in the
Phoenix City Council Chambers. All property owners are notified by mail of their
annual assessment cost by the Street Transportation and Community and Economic
Development departments 20 days prior to the public hearing. Notice of the public
hearing also will be published in the Record Reporter as specified below. No further
notification is required after the public hearing.

To be published:
The Record Reporter
· Nov. 1, 2023


Page 108

· Nov. 3, 2023

Location
The Downtown EMSD is generally bounded by Fillmore Street, 7th Street, 3rd Avenue
and the railroad tracks south of Jackson Street.
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers John Chan and Alan Stephenson, and
the Community and Economic Development and Street Transportation departments.




Page 109
ATTACHMENT A
2024 Downtown Phoenix Enhanced Municipal Services District
Proposed Work Plan

Developed by staff for Advisory Board and City Council approval, the
following goals and objectives are guided by the priorities of Enhanced
Municipal Service District (EMSD) stakeholders and the mission of DPI.

Administration, Finance, and Information Technology

Goal: To manage shared resources and maximize efficiencies while
supporting initiatives and projects organization-wide

Proposed Objectives to Achieve Goal
1. Manage newly implemented customer relationship management
(CRM) platform for stakeholder contacts and engagement as well as
PCA membership
2. Continue to identify process improvements, training, budget saving
opportunities, and ways to help staff across all DPI departments and
affiliates work more efficiently and effectively
3. Support the work of all DPI departments and affiliates through
finance, administrative, and IT services
4. Utilize and maximize resources within Emfluent program, a local
Predictive Insights firm that specializes in talent optimization, office
culture development, career pathing and hiring best practices
5. Prioritize employee development and retention throughout the year
6. Oversee the implementation and completion of mid-year and end-
of-year assessments
7. Enhance the office experience for both employees and visitors,
making it an increasingly magnetic nexus of city building activity
8. Manage inventory and spending of Downtown Phoenix Inc. branded
merchandise and supplies




Page 110
Marketing + Events

Goal: Promoting our organization’s brand of mission-driven service and
advancing the narrative of our evolving neighborhood through inclusive
events, dynamic digital storytelling, in-demand visitor resources and
strategic media campaigns

Proposed Objectives to Achieve Goal
1. Complete buildout and open new Community Resources Hub
2. Continue to create content that strengthens dtphx.org and DPI’s
social media platforms as invaluable resources for Downtown news
and event information, while also capturing the spirit that makes our
neighborhood great
3. Continue to enlist artists, community contributors, and social media
influencers to help elevate our events and tell diverse, inclusive, and
authentic Downtown stories
4. Continue to strengthen our events portfolio, with special attention
paid to inclusive events, cultural events, family friendly events and
those events that activate public spaces and benefit our street level
businesses
a. Similar to programs executed during Super Bowl, use large
events like Final Four as megaphones for telling Downtown’s
story
5. Continue to reimagine dtphx.org, including improving the events
calendar and overall navigation site-wide, streamlining business
information and putting the enhanced municipal services our
organization provides front and center
6. Continue to advocate for local artists, bring new pieces of public art
to the neighborhood, and create new ways to promote Downtown’s
thriving art scene
7. Continue to promote and raise awareness of family-friendly
infrastructure, amenities and events




Page 111
8. Continue to work with Visit Phoenix, Phoenix Convention Center, and
hospitality partners in booking new business, securing return business
and ushering Phoenix’s rise up the convention city rankings


Community Engagement

Goal: To ensure stakeholders are engaged, informed, and excited about
being a part of an authentic, hyper-local and experiential Downtown for all

Proposed Objectives to Achieve Goal
1. Continue to engage and inform stakeholders via monthly Open
House meetings, monthly Events, Streets and Transportation
meetings, monthly Schedule of Events (SOE) email communications
as well as high impact stakeholder alerts
2. Fully migrate to and utilize new Client Relationship Management
Platform (CRM), Virtuous, to dive deeper into data organization and
consolidation, so that stakeholder records can be accessed cross-
departmentally and eventually be transitioned to being managed by
Administration, Finance, and Information Technology
3. Continue to work with Valley Metro and Kiewit to strategize around
light rail construction mitigation as well as next steps for the future of
light rail ridership including but not limited to: preparing the public for
active track use, safety and best practices, mobile fares, wayfinding
and rechargeable passes
4. Ensure proper communication channels are in place with property
management and security teams leading into Final Four 2024 and
other major events
5. Advance multi-modal transportation initiatives and act on parking
study recommendations
a. Work with City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department to
implement additional co-branded 15-minute metered parking
spaces near new high-rise residential and street level retail




Page 112
b. Work with City of Phoenix Police Department and City of
Phoenix Street Transportation Department and City of Phoenix
special event staff to reimagine the Sunburst Traffic Plan
6. Continue placemaking efforts by commissioning public art and
creating cross-collaborative pop-up activations with stakeholders in
public spaces
7. In partnership with Marketing + Events department (Events Manager),
continue to grow and evolve “The Flock” volunteer program utilizing
Virtuous Volunteer Management Software
8. Continue to fine tune street pole banner program processes to be
more cost-efficient and generate higher non-assessment revenues

DTPHX Ambassadors | Clean + Green Team

Goal: To continue building on our reputation as one of the cleanest and
most welcoming downtowns in the country

Proposed Objectives to Achieve Goal

Ambassador Program
1. Continue to serve as eyes and ears for Downtown by maintaining 24
full-time Ambassadors
2. Continue to develop Ambassadors through ongoing series of monthly
trainings beyond 30/60/90-day onboarding program
a. Provide familiarization tours to Ambassadors to keep up with
the rapid growth and development of Downtown
b. Ongoing trainings such as nonviolent crisis intervention, CPR,
stop the bleed, self-defense and active shooter, plus increased
engagement with Downtown Operations Unit
3. Continue to participate in the City’s coordinated efforts to reducing
homelessness by connecting individuals experiencing homelessness
to services




Page 113
a. Continue partnership with Community Bridges and two (2) full-
time Outreach Navigators while expanding coordination with
Arizona State University’s CBI Navigator and security team
4. Modify “hydration station” to be battery powered for easier mobility
and to use as a mobile collateral kiosk by Ambassadors
5. Increased bike training allowing for more coverage and speedy
response
6. Increase pop-up park activations
7. Increase info tables (not just at events)
8. Continue to work with ASU to activate Civic Space Park
9. Grow inventory of promotional giveaways
Clean & Green Team
1. Continue to clean and disinfect high-touch, high-traffic public
spaces, and infrastructure with high pressure washing equipment
a. Invest in industrial grade equipment to better clean and disinfect
public realm
2. Improve walkability of Downtown’s corridors and enhance the street
level experience through landscaping
a. Increase shade through tree plantings and, in partnership with
the City of Phoenix and Valley Metro, install shade structures for
high traffic sidewalks where trees can’t be planted
b. Add planters with flowering plants to beautify building exteriors
near main intersections throughout the EMSD
3. Assess and improve public amenities throughout the Streetscape
Improvement District, such as:
a. Furnishings like benches and chess/checkers tables
b. Outdoor string lights and other decorative across pedestrian
corridors and other decorative lighting
c. Interactive activations such as motion-detected street planter
speakers
4. Continue to assess existing vehicular and pedestrian wayfinding
signage throughout the EMSD and provide recommendations for
updating and/or sunsetting
5. Continue sustainability efforts (i.e. restaurant mister sensors, waste
diversion)



Page 114
Business Development

Goal: To foster Downtown as a thriving and sustainable business,
education and urban living epicenter of our city and region



Proposed Objectives to Achieve Goal

1. Promote and provide personalized tours of Downtown, in partnership
with city’s Community & Economic Development Department
(CEDD), to developers, investors, companies, and brokers showcasing
Downtown’s growth and amenity package
a. Evolve & improve golf cart tours through new equipment and
customized collateral
2. Attend all pre-development meetings at the City of Phoenix and offer
support to developers and business owners looking for data or
assistance to move their project forward
3. Continue to support the transition of the Phoenix Bioscience Core
(PBC) into a major employment center in health, bio and life sciences
4. Focus on supporting current Downtown businesses, including
restaurants and retailers, in partnership with CEDD
5. Act as the “one-stop” information resource for developers, brokers,
investors, and companies interested in locating Downtown
a. Enhance information sharing capabilities with reimagined and
more brand-aligned Business Development Collateral to forge
even stronger partnerships with City and regional agencies
6. Continue to support co-working growth and the growing
entrepreneurial/start-up ecosystem in Downtown
a. Rent desk space on a rotating basis at Downtown locations in
order to establish relationships with businesses as they grow
and scale
b. When appropriate, help maturing companies find permanent
office space in Downtown




Page 115
7. Assist CEDD’s business attraction efforts with a focus on the
following:
a. Non-food and beverage locally-owned retail concepts
b. Attracting businesses to locate, relocate or expand into
Downtown’s current commercial real estate vacancies
c. Support companies’ post-Covid recovery efforts to return
employees to the office
i. Create and manage programs that will help employers
lure their employees back to the office
8. Focus on adding family-friendly infrastructure and programming to
emphasize Downtown as a competitive place where families can live,
work, play, and learn
9. Proactively seek opportunities to use GIS mapping, digital twin once
completed, and other interactive visual storytelling platforms to
promote Downtown and engage new audiences in its growth and
development
10. Raise awareness of Downtown development outside of our
local sphere by pursuing opportunities to participate on panels and
engage in relevant industry conferences
11. Assess and implement sustainability programs and tool kits that
positively impact Downtown businesses, streetscape and
environment




Page 116
ATTACHMENT B
CY 2024 EMSD Budget - Estimated

Account 2024 Budget
General Office 632,208
Admin Salaries 270,703
Events 306,696
Marketing 541,769
Expenses Business Development 230,777
BID Services 2,406,881
Total Base Budget 4,389,034

SID 167,222
Total District Budget 4,556,256
Assessment Revenue 4,706,256
Revenue
Non-assessment Revenue 150,000
Page 117



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
2024 Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services District Assessment Diagram
(Resolution 22157)

Request City Council approval of the 2024 Downtown Enhanced Municipal Services
District (EMSD) Assessment Diagram. There is no financial impact as a result of this
request.

Summary
The City Council authorized formation of the Downtown EMSD in 1990 to provide
enhanced municipal services, above and beyond the level of services provided in the
remainder of the City. The Downtown EMSD is generally bounded by Fillmore Street,
7th Street, 3rd Avenue and the railroad tracks south of Jackson Street. The costs for
the Downtown EMSD’s services are paid through assessments on property owners
within the Downtown EMSD boundaries.

The proposed 2024 Downtown EMSD Assessment Diagram (Attachment A - 2024
Downtown EMSD Diagram), indicates the properties to be assessed and is on file in
the Office of the Director of the City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department, and
may also be viewed at https://www.investinphoenix.com/why-
phoenix/downtown/downtown-phoenix. The proposed assessments and calendar year
(CY) 2024 Downtown EMSD Diagram are based on the estimate of expenses and
property data available as of April 26, 2023. The proposed diagram was completed on
Sept. 21, 2023. Per Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) 48- 575(d), the CY 2024
Downtown EMSD Diagram shows each separate lot numbered consecutively, the area
in square feet of each lot, and the area in square feet of any building or buildings
located on each lot.

Public streets, alleys, and property utilized for residential purposes that do not benefit
by the enhanced municipal services are excluded from this proposed CY 2024
Downtown EMSD Diagram.

This request for Council action includes a Resolution approving the CY 2024
Downtown EMSD Diagram.




Page 118


Financial Impact
There is no financial impact for approving the CY 2024 Downtown EMSD Diagram.

Cuncurrence/Previous Council Action
The Economic Development and Housing Subcommittee meeting approved the CY
2024 Downtown EMSD work plan and budget on Oct. 11, 2023, by a vote of 4-0.
Public Outreach
A public hearing will be held for property owners to discuss the proposed
assessments, costs, and services provided in connection with the Downtown EMSD. If
approved, the public hearing would be set for Nov. 15, 2023, at 2:30 p.m., in the
Phoenix City Council Chambers. All property owners are notified by mail of their
annual assessment cost by the Street Transportation and Community and Economic
Development departments 20 days prior to the public hearing. Notice of the public
hearing also will be published in the Record Reporter as specified below. No further
notification is required after the public hearing.

To be published:
The Record Reporter
· Nov. 1, 2023
· Nov. 3, 2023
Location
The Downtown EMSD is generally bounded by Fillmore Street, 7th Street, 3rd Avenue
and the railroad tracks south of Jackson Street
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers John Chan and Alan Stephenson, and
the Community and Economic Development and Street Transportation departments.




Page 119
DOWNTOWN PHOENIX ENHANCED
MUNICIPAL SERVICES DISTRICT
2024 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

Fillmore Street
U
V
32-49 65


T
89 93
66 82 90

T
1 50 67 91 94A




T
51 68 100

T
52 69 92 104
53 70 111
54 72
Taylor Street


1st Street
U
V U
V

Central Avenue
7 29
55 73


T


T T T T
761 61 74 83 86
9 101




2nd Avenue 2nd Street 5th Street
60 762 110 769




3rd Avenue 1st Avenue 3rd Street
10 58




7th Street
59 71

T
25 57


T
12 105

T T
24 56
13 62 71A 763
84 102 109
14 22
Polk Street
VU
U V T
15 21


T

U
V U
V

T T
16 20 27 28 113
63 79


T

U
V T
80 99 107
103 106
17 81

Van Buren Street Van Buren Street
T 115
U
VUV T
T T

T
119 321
118 323 - 362 363
T
366 367
U
V
120-
320 322
Monroe Street
Monroe Street
T
372 477
373 483 484 485 486

T
370 479 478


T
475A 491

T
374 375 - 489
368 490




T
488 487
369 475 481




2nd Street
Adams Street
T 509 510
498 500 - 507 513 512


T 497

T T 495
T 508 T 511 514-




Washington Street Washington Street


T T
5th Street
523 524 771 - 777 765-768 95-98
778-785

T 538 T
Jefferson Street

T T 528 529 543 544 545 546 547




7th Street
542 542A
548 549 550 Jefferson Street
759 Madison Street
T 551

T
556 557 558 561 562




T T

T
554 555




Central Avenue
559 560 568 553



4th Street
569 570 571 572




3rd Avenue
Jackson Street


1st Avenue 1st Street 2nd Street 3rd Street
T T
2nd Ave
583 584

T
573 574 575 576 577 578 579 581
582 760
588 589 590 591-
580 758




LEGEND & SCALE


1 ASSESSMENT #
SUBMITTED _________________________________ ___________
STREETSCAPE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS DATE


IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX THIS _________ DAY OF ________________, 2023




O
_____________________________
0 125 250 375 500 MAYOR

Feet ATTEST ________________________
CITY CLERK

1 INCH = 125 FEET FILED THIS ________ DAY OF _________________, 2023


_______________________________
This drawing was created for reference and SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS
Parcel data from County Assessor as of 4/6/2023.
planning purposes only and not for construction.
Assessment data updated as of 9/19/2023.
Page 120
DOWNTOWN PHOENIX ENHANCED
MUNICIPAL SERVICES DISTRICT
2024 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM DETAIL
LotSizein CountyParcel BuildingSizein LotSizein CountyParcel BuildingSizein LotSizein BuildingSizein LotSizein BuildingSizein
ID# Owner ID# Owner ID# Owner CountyParcel# ID# Owner CountyParcel#
SquareFeet # SquareFeet SquareFeet # SquareFeet SquareFeet SquareFeet SquareFeet SquareFeet

1 FILLMOREAPARTMENTSOWNERLLC 97,222 111Ͳ42Ͳ139 292,582 196 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ453 1,126 393 GUERREROERICA 1,214 112Ͳ21Ͳ301 1,098 588 PHOENIXCENTERFORDENTISTRYLLC 13,750 112Ͳ27Ͳ111E ParkingLot
2 197 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ454 962 394 DESYLVATONYARTHUR 1,794 112Ͳ21Ͳ302 1,718 589 PHOENIXCENTERFORDENTISTRYLLC 27,530 112Ͳ27Ͳ115 25,133
3 198 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ455 1,310 395 LIDDYPROPERTIESLLC 805 112Ͳ21Ͳ303 837 590 301JACKSONLLC 20,625 112Ͳ30Ͳ120 ParkingLot
4 199 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ456 1,159 396 ROZHINIMANI 854 112Ͳ21Ͳ304 837 591 SHIELDSPATRICKMIV/ALICIAL 1,418 112Ͳ42Ͳ051 1,418
5 200 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ457 1,323 397 RAKKEVIN 872 112Ͳ21Ͳ305 858 592 MONTGOMERYGRACEN 866 112Ͳ42Ͳ052 900
6 201 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ458 993 398 HAWANASIXLLC 792 112Ͳ21Ͳ306 751 593 STECKMANBRIANGEORGE 998 112Ͳ42Ͳ053 1,020
7 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/GARRETSONJOHNE 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ026 ParkingLot 202 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ459 1,126 399 CURTISPHAMANNFAMILYTRUST 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ307 710 594 ROSSMATTHEWS 943 112Ͳ42Ͳ054 996
8 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/GARRETSONJOHNE 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ024 ParkingLot 203 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ460 1,394 400 SNITZTREVOR 1,200 112Ͳ21Ͳ308 1,200 595 TAYLORFAMILYREVOCABLETRUST 1,446 112Ͳ42Ͳ055 1,463
9 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ022 ParkingLot 204 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ461 1,394 401 BRODERICKTHOMAS 751 112Ͳ21Ͳ309 751 596 JOHNSONRICHARD 1,579 112Ͳ42Ͳ056 1,412
10 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ020 ParkingLot 205 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ462 1,126 402 UNDERWOODJOHNM 1,174 112Ͳ21Ͳ310 1,174 597 BECKHAMZACKARYKRISTIAN 1,078 112Ͳ42Ͳ057 1,078
11 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ019 ParkingLot 206 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ463 962 403 SHEADIANAL 1,098 112Ͳ21Ͳ311 1,098 598 ISAACJODYS 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ058 1,426
12 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ017 ParkingLot 207 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ464 1,310 404 SEVERINOROBERT 1,395 112Ͳ21Ͳ312 1,395 599 JACOBSENTHOMAS 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ059 900
13 333N.3RDAVELLC 8,138 111Ͳ42Ͳ015 VacantLot 208 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ465 1,159 405 KINDELAARONLAWRENCE 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ313 837 600 KACZALATIMOTHY/NANCY 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ060 1,020
14 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ011A VacantLot 209 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ466 1,323 406 SWINDLETIMOTHYD/KERRYK 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ314 837 601 VILLESCASNICHOLAS/JENNIFER 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ061 996
15 333N.3RDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ009 VacantLot 210 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ467 993 407 THORPEDAVIDH 858 112Ͳ21Ͳ315 858 602 GANUSALEXANDRU 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ062 1,463
16 ZAYOGROUPLLC 21,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ115 10,864 211 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ468 1,126 408 STEVETOEDTEMEIER 751 112Ͳ21Ͳ316 751 603 NYEBRADLEYA 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ063 1,412
17 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/ETAL 17,478 111Ͳ42Ͳ005A ParkingLot 212 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ469 1,394 409 KULAKSUSANK 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ317 710 604 CARAMBERISVANESSA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ064 1,074
18 HIGGINBOTHAMPROPERTIESLLC 11,200 111Ͳ42Ͳ003 12,856 213 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ470 1,394 410 AFRICAEDWINSIII 1,254 112Ͳ21Ͳ318 1,200 605 REDAJASON 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ065 1,076
19 FOLSOMPROJECTSLLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ006 6,999 214 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ471 1,126 411 COXRICHARD 755 112Ͳ21Ͳ319 755 606 ERBJAYPARRY 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ066 1,170
20 FEDͲGSAParkingLot 21,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ007B ParkingLot 215 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ472 962 412 STEERTHEODORE 1,268 112Ͳ21Ͳ320 1,174 607 TROYANEKDAVIDC/TINAM 1,042 112Ͳ42Ͳ067 985
21 CUNNINGHAMBUILDINGLLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ008 SeeID#22 216 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ473 1,310 413 RUBINBRETT 1,148 112Ͳ21Ͳ321 1,098 608 JOELGREENBERGIRA5005 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ068 1,426
22 CUNNINGHAMBUILDINGLLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ010 10,955 217 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ474 1,159 414 LITTLEITALYBALLPARKAPARTMENTSLLC 1,432 112Ͳ21Ͳ322 1,395 609 COOPERDAVID/ELIZABETH 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ069 900
23 GARRETSONJOHNE&BARTONLFABER 4,200 111Ͳ42Ͳ012 ParkingLot 218 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ475 1,323 415 MILLERJEFFREYA 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ323 837 610 BRANNONCRAIGS/CHRISTINAM 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ070 1,020
24 GARRETSONJOHNE&BARTONLFABER 8,400 111Ͳ42Ͳ013 ParkingLot 219 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ476 993 416 DILLAVOUCHRISTINA/LIEBERMANNANCY 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ324 837 611 MILLERKENNETHP 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ071 996
25 GARRETSONJOHNE&BARTONLFABER 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ016 ParkingLot 220 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ477 1,126 417 METCALFBRIAN 866 112Ͳ21Ͳ325 858 612 ESCHJON/KATHLEEN 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ072 1,463
26 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/GARRETSONJOHNE 10,500 111Ͳ42Ͳ018 ParkingLot 221 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ478 1,394 418 MACKINSARAH 751 112Ͳ21Ͳ326 751 613 REIFURTHLAWRENCE 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ073 1,412
27 AP355NCENTRALPROPERTYLLCC/ORAJENSHASTRI 21,675 111Ͳ45Ͳ188B 333,508 222 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ479 1,394 419 BOWLESJACKA 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ327 710 614 ESCOBEDOJOSHUA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ074 1,074
28 APPLENINEHOSPITALITYOWNERSHIPINC. 16,760 111Ͳ45Ͳ188A 125,871 223 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ480 1,126 420 GRIFFINDARNEE 861 112Ͳ21Ͳ328 861 615 CLARKJACE 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ075 1,076
29 BURGEGOLDIEH&RICHARDW 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ025 3,508 224 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ481 962 421 GINASANTILIVINGTRUST 960 112Ͳ21Ͳ329 953 616 ZWEIBACKJACOBE/ADAM/MARSHALLKIMBERLY 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ076 1,170
30 225 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ482 1,310 422 NORMAJEANCLIFTONSURVIVORSTRUST 1,289 112Ͳ21Ͳ330 1,289 617 YAMASHITAFRED 1,042 112Ͳ42Ͳ077 985
31 EVRONͲSNYDERPATRICIAE 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ041A ParkingLot 226 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ483 1,159 423 PORTERRUSSELBENTON 1,098 112Ͳ21Ͳ331 1,098 618 NZAMUKALEMA/ATOKIILEKA 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ078 1,426
32 SCHEELABIGAILA 984 111Ͳ42Ͳ117 984 227 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ484 1,323 424 DAVISJUSTINROBERT/BETTYANNHINDERKSTR 853 112Ͳ21Ͳ332 833 619 GANUSALEXANDRU 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ079 900
33 FERGUSONANNEYVONNE 1,100 111Ͳ42Ͳ118 1,100 228 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ485 993 425 VANCEKRISTIN 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ333 837 620 BUSCHSCOTT 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ080 1,020
34 MYERSJOHN 1,358 111Ͳ42Ͳ119 1,358 229 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ486 1,126 426 MORALESGABRIEL 842 112Ͳ21Ͳ334 837 621 PARKERDAWNMARIE/CRAIGWARREN 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ081 996
35 MELISSAMCARRUTHLIVINGTRUST 1,243 111Ͳ42Ͳ120 1,243 230 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ487 1,394 427 SUMARINVESTMENTSDOWNTOWNLLC 866 112Ͳ21Ͳ335 858 622 DILLARDDENNISR 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ082 1,463
36 DODGEMARIA 960 111Ͳ42Ͳ121 960 231 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ488 1,394 428 MELTONMICHELLE 796 112Ͳ21Ͳ336 751 623 MCCARTHYKEVIN 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ083 1,412
37 VARELASEANCLAYTON/JORQUEZMAGDALENA 927 111Ͳ42Ͳ122 927 232 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ489 1,126 429 ALLSTATEHOMESLLC 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ337 710 624 WHITTLERGEORGETTA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ084 1,074
38 SCUTTITHEODOREJ 1,654 111Ͳ42Ͳ123 1,654 233 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ490 962 430 SIMMONSEARL/JOHNSONAMY 797 112Ͳ21Ͳ338 861 625 HAPPYWEARINGSHORTSTRUST 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ085 1,076
39 COFSKYEMILYDIANE/DAVENPORTMARYR 1,310 111Ͳ42Ͳ124 1,310 234 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ491 1,310 431 LEKRISTIE/SIMON 960 112Ͳ21Ͳ339 953 626 CATHERINEATOLBERTREVOCABLETRUST 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ086 1,142
40 SHERMANJEFFERY 1,334 111Ͳ42Ͳ125 1,334 235 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ492 1,159 432 LEDBETTERGROUPLLC 1,289 112Ͳ21Ͳ340 1,289 627 SALESRICHARD 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ087 1,520
41 NORTHHOLDLLC 1,247 111Ͳ42Ͳ126 1,247 236 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ493 1,323 433 HOWARDPARDI 1,098 112Ͳ21Ͳ341 1,098 628 GARLANDJEFFREYA 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ088 1,426
42 MARASCOMICHELLEANN 1,492 111Ͳ42Ͳ127 1,492 237 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ494 993 434 RESSEGUIEWILLIAMT 833 112Ͳ21Ͳ342 833 629 COOPERSCOTT 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ089 900
43 CORENSKIMBERLYJ/PAULF 1,222 111Ͳ42Ͳ128 1,338 238 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ495 1,126 435 WATSONJAN/DALEKANE 837 112Ͳ21Ͳ343 837 630 ANTILLONVICTORD 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ090 1,020
44 HAMMERSMITHTRUST 1,239 111Ͳ42Ͳ129 1,239 239 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ496 1,394 436 BELLBRENDANMICHAEL/MICHAELS/MELANIER 842 112Ͳ21Ͳ344 837 631 LUIJERRY/SHARON 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ091 996
45 KILBEREMILY 1,291 111Ͳ42Ͳ130 1,291 240 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ497 1,394 437 VILLACOLBY 866 112Ͳ21Ͳ345 858 632 CARANDANGROMEO/SHUANGYING 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ092 1,463
46 PETERSONANDREW 1,094 111Ͳ42Ͳ131 1,094 241 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ498 1,126 438 ORPHEUMGROUPLLC 796 112Ͳ21Ͳ346 751 633 KYBARTASEDMUNDR/MARLYS 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ093 1,412
47 ESTENSONFAMILYTRUST 1,803 111Ͳ42Ͳ132 1,803 242 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ499 962 439 KURNETAJASON 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ347 710 634 SCHULTZSTEVENROBERT/ANNETTECHANG 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ094 1,074
48 RK1MANAGEMENTLLC 1,370 111Ͳ42Ͳ133 1,370 243 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,119 112Ͳ21Ͳ592 1,119 440 WESTERMANROBERT 797 112Ͳ21Ͳ348 861 635 EPPERSONSARAHE 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ095 1,076
49 ADELMANJENNIFERKAYE/GUTIERREZRICKJOSEPH 1,310 111Ͳ42Ͳ134 1,310 244 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ593 1,880 441 ORPHEUM807LLC 960 112Ͳ21Ͳ349 960 636 GORMANSTEPHENG/TRACEYANN 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ096 1,142
50 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ082 ParkingLot 245 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ594 1,873 442 MARYMCDONOUGHLIVINGTRUST 1,289 112Ͳ21Ͳ350 1,174 637 MARTINCHRISTOPHER 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ097 1,520
51 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ080 ParkingLot 246 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,119 112Ͳ21Ͳ595 2,119 443 MARYMCDONOUGHLIVINGTRUST 1,162 112Ͳ21Ͳ351 1,098 638 BYASBEVERLYH 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ098 1,426
52 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ078 ParkingLot 247 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ596 1,394 444 GEIGERJULIAN 853 112Ͳ21Ͳ352 833 639 KIDDTOBY 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ099 900
53 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ076 ParkingLot 248 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ597 1,394 445 DMANIGROUPLLC 793 112Ͳ21Ͳ353 837 640 C2ACQUISITIONS 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ100 1,020
54 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ074 ParkingLot 249 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ598 1,126 446 CUTTERBRUCE/KERRIE 842 112Ͳ21Ͳ354 837 641 HIROTACHRISTOPH/HIGAMIAI 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ101 996
55 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ073 ParkingLot 250 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ599 962 447 SMITHJAMES 866 112Ͳ21Ͳ355 858 642 GUTIERREZALEXSR/GAILA 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ102 1,463
56 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ065 ParkingLot 251 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ508 1,880 448 ARMENTABENNIE/MARLA 796 112Ͳ21Ͳ356 751 643 HINDMONSANDRA/WILLIAME 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ103 1,412
57 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ066 ParkingLot 252 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ509 1,873 449 CHAVEZRENE/MARIAG 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ357 710 644 MANZOEFRAIN 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ104 1,074
58 3332NDAVELLC 845 111Ͳ42Ͳ067 ParkingLot 253 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ510 993 450 JOVELLANOSROEL 797 112Ͳ21Ͳ358 861 645 LESTERCHAD 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ105 1,076
59 3332NDAVELLC 6,155 111Ͳ42Ͳ068 ParkingLot 254 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ511 1,126 451 SHEDDSCOTT 960 112Ͳ21Ͳ359 953 646 SANCHEZLEONARDO 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ106 1,149
60 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ069 ParkingLot 255 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ512 1,394 452 SUAREZJMICHAELTR 1,289 112Ͳ21Ͳ360 1,174 647 DANAROBERTHICKSLIVINGTRUST 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ107 1,520
61 3332NDAVELLC 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ071 ParkingLot 256 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ513 1,394 453 CASCIAROSANDOVALFAMILYLIVING 1,162 112Ͳ21Ͳ361 1,098 648 WALSHFAMILYTRUST 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ108 1,426
62 3332NDAVELLC 6,300 111Ͳ42Ͳ091 ParkingLot 257 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ514 1,126 454 BOUCHEESHEREE 853 112Ͳ21Ͳ362 833 649 GOSIEWSKIMARKJ 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ109 900
63 PHOENIXͲWellsFargoBuilding 52,990 111Ͳ42Ͳ106B 253,464 258 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ515 962 455 HLKMANAGEMENTLLC 794 112Ͳ21Ͳ363 837 650 LENHANTHANH/HARUTAͲLEAKEMI 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ110 1,020
64 ASUDowntownResidenceHall 9,499 111Ͳ42Ͳ087A 1,116 259 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ540 1,880 456 RYBACKMICHAELG 843 112Ͳ21Ͳ364 837 651 MARYKAYENELLESLIVINGTRUST 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ111 996
65 ASUDowntownResidenceHall 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ085 3510 260 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ541 1,880 457 OBOYLEROBERTMARC 866 112Ͳ21Ͳ365 858 652 WIELAGECHARLOTTERICE/JEFFREYDAVID 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ112 1,463
66 ASUDowntownResidenceHall 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ083 2853 261 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ542 993 458 ALEX&COMPANYLLC 796 112Ͳ21Ͳ366 751 653 FOLKERTHCHERYLD/JACKD 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ113 1,412
67 ASUDowntownResidenceHall 6,971 111Ͳ42Ͳ081A VacantLot 262 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ543 1,126 459 BONFELDJESSEMARK/LEBOWMARGOTHAHN 710 112Ͳ21Ͳ367 710 654 HARRISTREMAYNE 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ114 1,074
68 ARIZONABOARDOFREGENTS 6,906 111Ͳ42Ͳ079A ParkingLot 263 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,441 112Ͳ21Ͳ544 1,394 460 MERTENSSCOTTE 861 112Ͳ21Ͳ368 861 655 CAMPOSͲBAUTISTABLANCAFABIOLA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ115 1,076
69 ARIZONABOARDOFREGENTS 6,921 111Ͳ42Ͳ077A ParkingLot 264 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,440 112Ͳ21Ͳ545 1,394 461 WALSHMATTHEWR 960 112Ͳ21Ͳ369 960 656 MANNGEOFFREYL 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ116 1,149
70 ASULOTNORTHOFYMCAͲABOR 6,996 111Ͳ42Ͳ075A 2,591 265 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ546 1,126 462 SANMARCO77LLC 1,289 112Ͳ21Ͳ370 1,174 657 KELLYMICHAEL 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ117 1,520
71 YMCAOFPHOENIX 21,275 111Ͳ42Ͳ064C 110,962 266 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ547 962 463 VANRIPERMARDIMARIE 1,162 112Ͳ21Ͳ371 1,098 658 MCCOMASSCOTA/COMBSDENNISE 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ118 1,426
71A ASUSTUDENTRECCENTER 20,325 111Ͳ42Ͳ138 78,806 267 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ548 1,880 464 SIGALAERICKALBERTO 737 112Ͳ21Ͳ372 833 659 MCKAYGREGORYB 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ119 900
72 ASUFORMERBAILBONDSBUILDING 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ064B VacantLot 268 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ549 1,873 465 HANSWMATHIESENTRUST 2,559 112Ͳ21Ͳ373 2,668 660 SCOTTKEVIN/LISA 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ120 1,020
73 YMCAOFPHOENIX 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ072 110,962 269 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ550 993 466 TASBLLC 3,691 112Ͳ21Ͳ374 3,691 661 WOOGLENN/GALE 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ121 996
74 YMCAOFPHOENIX 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ070 SeeID#73 270 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ551 1,126 467 HANAGROUPLLC 1,487 112Ͳ21Ͳ583 9,445 662 SUMMIT1205LLC 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ122 1,463
75 271 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,441 112Ͳ21Ͳ552 1,394 468 JYCRESTAURANTGROUPLLC 1,568 112Ͳ21Ͳ584 9,445 663 MARKTIMOTHYNELSONREVOCABLELIVINGTRUST 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ123 1,412
76 272 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,440 112Ͳ21Ͳ553 1,394 469 114WADAMSC103LLC 3,268 112Ͳ21Ͳ585 9,445 664 NATHNEERAJ/ARCHNA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ124 1,074
77 273 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ554 1,126 470 HEMPIMARNMANLLC 1,706 112Ͳ21Ͳ586 9,445 665 DIEWALDMICHAEL 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ125 1,076
78 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/GARRETSONJOHNE 14,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ103A ParkingLot 274 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ555 962 471 DAISYADAMSLLCͲC105 1,416 112Ͳ21Ͳ587 9,445 666 MCGINNISSHANEMICHAEL 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ126 1,149
79 PHOENIXͲCompassBank/TRANSITBLDG 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ099 ParkingLot 275 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ556 1,880 472 MILSAPANDREWNELSON/FOSTERGRACEELIZABETHANN 138 112Ͳ21Ͳ588 138 667 ALBRIGHTFAMILYTRUST 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ127 1,520
80 PHOENIXͲCompassBank/TRANSITBLDG 7,000 111Ͳ42Ͳ097 SeeID#81 276 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ557 1,873 473 C107AMDC108LLC 561 112Ͳ21Ͳ589 1,169 668 CASCIAKRISTINATRUST 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ128 1,426
81 PHOENIXͲCompassBank/TRANSITBLDG 18,018 111Ͳ42Ͳ094 232,670 277 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ558 993 474 C107AMDC108LLC 184 112Ͳ21Ͳ590 1,169 669 GREGORYMANDDONNAPHULBERTFAMILYTRUST 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ129 900
82 ASUͲU.S.PostOffice/ASUSTUDENTUNION 78,300 111Ͳ42Ͳ061 54,265 278 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ559 1,126 475 C109LLC 424 112Ͳ21Ͳ591 1,169 670 POLLAKKEVIN 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ130 1,020
83 PHOENIXͲPARKSCIVICSPACE 130,445 111Ͳ42Ͳ137 28,575 279 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,441 112Ͳ21Ͳ560 1,394 475A 101NORTHFIRSTAVELLC 45,319 112Ͳ21Ͳ375 591,390 671 CHOUMICHAEL/YUENVIVIAN 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ131 996
84 MEANSLTDLLP 7,270 111Ͳ42Ͳ062 8,531 280 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,440 112Ͳ21Ͳ561 1,394 476 672 FARRAGEMICHAELJ&CYNTHIAK 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ132 1,463
85 ELECTRICREDVENTURESLLC 111,688 111Ͳ42Ͳ114A Construction 281 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ562 1,126 477 1WESTMONROELLC 8,594 112Ͳ21Ͳ059 20,606 673 HAROLDECAMPBELLIIIANDJEANETTELEECAMPBELLLIVINGTRUST 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ133 1,412
86 ASUJOURNALISM/UCENTSUPERBLOCK 202,772 111Ͳ45Ͳ183 645,508 282 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ563 962 478 130NCENTRALLLC 6,875 112Ͳ21Ͳ057 31,373 674 MOONBLOSSOMINVESTMENTSFAMILYLIMITEDPARTNERSHIP 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ134 1,074
87 283 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,879 112Ͳ21Ͳ564 1,879 479 130NCENTRALLLC 1,719 112Ͳ21Ͳ063 SeeID#478 675 BENHARBONJULIANA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ135 1,076
88 ARCPOFCPHOENIX(CENTRAL)AZLLC 48,832 111Ͳ45Ͳ189 782,912 284 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,872 112Ͳ21Ͳ565 1,872 480 112NCENTRALNOVELCOWORKINGLLC 10,425 112Ͳ21Ͳ058 82,246 676 BORSAJOSHUAA/JOHNJ/ANNEM 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ136 1,149
89 ValleyYouthTheaterBuilding 7,000 111Ͳ45Ͳ066 6,930 285 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,121 112Ͳ21Ͳ566 2,121 481 108Ͳ110NORTHCENTRALPROPERTIESLLC 5,200 112Ͳ21Ͳ061 3,772 677 EDSONMICHAEL/MICHELLE 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ137 1,520
90 VYTͲVACANT 7,000 111Ͳ45Ͳ065 3,500 286 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,440 112Ͳ21Ͳ567 1,394 482 RASKINRANDALLE/JENNARTR 5,000 112Ͳ21Ͳ060 11,284 678 CHRISTOPHERPANDANNMSLATE2006TRUST/SLATEJESSICA 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ138 1,426
91 VYTͲVACANT 3,494 111Ͳ45Ͳ064A VacantLot 287 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,441 112Ͳ21Ͳ568 1,394 483 CSMPHOENIXDOWNTOWNLLC 20,604 112Ͳ28Ͳ133 155,072 679 TUCKERLINDSAYA 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ139 900
92 TAYLORPLACE 52,352 111Ͳ45Ͳ186 359,395 288 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,079 112Ͳ21Ͳ569 2,079 484 CSMPHOENIXDOWNTOWNLLC 6,875 112Ͳ28Ͳ039 Alley 680 DWYERTEDL/THERESA 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ140 1,020
93 VYTͲCITYPARKINGLOT 10,500 111Ͳ45Ͳ067 ParkingLot 289 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ570 1,880 485 PHOENIXHOTELVENTURESLLC 6,875 112Ͳ28Ͳ037 44,621 681 PALUZZIJAMES/JONESERIC 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ141 996
94 VYTͲVACANT 3,500 111Ͳ45Ͳ068 VacantLot 290 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,872 112Ͳ21Ͳ571 1,872 486 PHOENIXHOTELVENTURESLLC 6,875 112Ͳ28Ͳ035 SeeID#485 682 ALDERKNOTTHOLDINGSLLC 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ142 1,463
94A VYTͲVACANT 3,498 111Ͳ45Ͳ069A VacantLot 291 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,121 112Ͳ21Ͳ572 2,121 487 PHOENIXHOTELVENTURESLLC 6,886 112Ͳ28Ͳ038 SeeID#489 683 SHUGRUETIMOTHYL/JACQUELINEL 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ143 1,412
95 SLRBLOCK23RESIDENTIALOWNERLLC 21,516 112Ͳ28Ͳ135 607,790 292 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,440 112Ͳ21Ͳ573 1,394 488 PHOENIXHOTELVENTURESLLC 6,886 112Ͳ28Ͳ040 SeeID#489 684 WESDELLMICHAELC 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ144 1,074
96 BLOCK23COMMERCIALLLC 1 112Ͳ28Ͳ137 Airspace 293 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,441 112Ͳ21Ͳ574 1,394 489 PHOENIXHOTELVENTURESLLC 20,618 112Ͳ28Ͳ042 609,885 685 BUGHPAULNICHOLAS 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ145 1,076
97 BLOCK23COMMERCIALLLC 48,299 112Ͳ28Ͳ134 551,243 294 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,079 112Ͳ21Ͳ575 2,079 490 PHOENIXLANDLEASELLC 6,886 112Ͳ28Ͳ036 SeeID#489 686 TEARPAKBONNIE 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ146 1,149
98 BLOCK23COMMERCIALLLC 46,145 112Ͳ28Ͳ136 395,317 295 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 4,406 112Ͳ21Ͳ576 4,406 491 HEPHOENIXLLC 90,102 112Ͳ28Ͳ044A 631,780 687 TORRESGARCIA 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ147 1,520
99 DIGITALPHOENIXVANBURENLLC 88,487 111Ͳ45Ͳ077B 376,438 296 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,778 112Ͳ21Ͳ577 2,778 492 PHOENIXͲCONVENTIONCENTER 718,682 112Ͳ29Ͳ094 1,636,027 688 BURNLEYHERBERTL/LEEͲBURNLEYJANIE 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ148 1,426
100 ASUNURSINGBLOCK 86,634 111Ͳ45Ͳ182 258,732 297 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,778 112Ͳ21Ͳ578 2,778 493 PHOENIXͲHERITAGE&SCIENCEPARK(GARAGE) 417,828 112Ͳ29Ͳ090 440,020 689 ENCHINTONJONATHAN 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ149 900
101 VWPEVB200GARAGELLC 42,759 111Ͳ45Ͳ087E 260,278 298 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 4,268 112Ͳ21Ͳ579 4,268 494 PHOENIXͲHERITAGE&SCIENCEPARK(HISTORYMUSEUM) 417,828 112Ͳ29Ͳ090 440,020 690 DERUEDANATHANIELPATRICK/PATRICKJ/KELLYͲDERUEDAKATERINA 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ150 1,085
ARTBURGERCOMPLEXSHERATONPHOENIX
44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC
102 DOWNTOWNHOTEL 123,348 111Ͳ45Ͳ175 981,015 299 2,723 112Ͳ21Ͳ580 2,723 495 PHOENIXͲHERITAGE&SCIENCEPARK(SCIENCEMUSEUM) 417,828 112Ͳ29Ͳ090 440,020 691 MULVIHILLBRIANJ/GIOIACHRISTINEA 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ151 996
103 VWPEVB200OFFICELLC 33,678 111Ͳ45Ͳ080A 250,000 300 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,723 112Ͳ21Ͳ581 2,723 496 PHOENIXͲHERITAGE&SCIENCEPARK(SQUARE) 417,828 112Ͳ29Ͳ090 440,020 692 KELLYDANDSHANNONEMILLER1998TRUST 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ152 1,463
104 AGPARIZONACENTEROWNERLLC 118,265 111Ͳ46Ͳ146 87,040 301 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ600 1,880 497 PHOENIXͲNewCityHall 67,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ087 622,637 693 BRADEDENNISONREVOCABLETRUST 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ153 1,412
105 AGPARIZONACENTEROWNERLLC 198,690 111Ͳ46Ͳ148 230,467 302 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ601 1,873 497 PHOENIXͲOrpheumTheatre 22,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ087 622,637 694 LJPHOENICIANPROPERTIESLLC 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ154 1,074
106 AGPARIZONACENTEROWNERLLC 63,815 111Ͳ46Ͳ138 412,981 303 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,119 112Ͳ21Ͳ602 2,119 498 PHOENIXͲWellsFargoBuilding 36,376 112Ͳ21Ͳ014E 253,640 695 FINCHCLARKL/CAROLJ 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ155 1,076
107 NADGPALMCOURTTOWERLP 39,971 111Ͳ46Ͳ141 Construction 304 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ603 1,394 499 PHOENIXͲWellsFargoBuilding 51,781 112Ͳ21Ͳ014D 525,816 696 STRUTHERSJOHN/CLAIRE 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ156 1,142
108 AGPARIZONACENTEROWNERLLC 56,095 111Ͳ46Ͳ143 CommonArea 305 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ604 1,394 500 TWORENAISSANCELLC 2,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ001 727,849 697 GARTENBERGART 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ157 1,520
109 PCPITWOARIZONALLC 46,125 111Ͳ46Ͳ132 632,852 306 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ605 1,126 501 TWORENAISSANCELLC 4,620 112Ͳ21Ͳ002 CommonArea 698 COLLOPYROBERT/JAMES 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ158 1,426
110 ALDKPHOENIXLLC 49,190 111Ͳ46Ͳ139 124,539 307 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ606 962 502 TWORENAISSANCELLC 3,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ003 CommonArea 699 UNIVERSITYINVESTMENTHOLDINGSLLC 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ159 900
111 NPGPHX1AZCLLC 72,100 111Ͳ46Ͳ133 2,591 308 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ607 1,880 503 TWORENAISSANCELLC 6,575 112Ͳ21Ͳ004 CommonArea 700 STILESALYSSA 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ160 1,020
112 CFD2OZLLC 39,428 111Ͳ46Ͳ147 ParkingLot 309 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ608 1,873 504 TWORENAISSANCELLC 4,830 112Ͳ21Ͳ007 CommonArea 701 DRANIKOVALEN 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ161 996
113 ABC1ͲABORͲASUͲUofA 38,230 111Ͳ46Ͳ151A 89,725 310 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,119 112Ͳ21Ͳ609 2,119 505 TWORENAISSANCELLC 11,625 112Ͳ21Ͳ008 SeeID#500 702 SHAPIROJARED 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ162 1,463
114 XSCPHOENIXINVESTMENTLLC 54,357 112Ͳ21Ͳ974a 643,503 311 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ610 1,394 506 TWORENAISSANCELLC 4,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ009 SeeID#500 703 COPPERSQUARE1606LLC 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ163 1,412
115 XSCPHOENIXINVESTMENTLLC 35,891 112Ͳ21Ͳ974b Construction 312 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ611 1,394 507 TWORENAISSANCELLC 4,500 112Ͳ21Ͳ012 SeeID#500 704 MARZDAVIDMICHAEL/CHARLOTTEROSE 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ164 1,074
116 313 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,088 112Ͳ21Ͳ612 2,088 508 ONERENAISSANCELLC 41,540 112Ͳ21Ͳ086 569,101 705 SEWELLEDWINJ/CAROLJ 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ165 1,076
117 314 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,880 112Ͳ21Ͳ613 1,880 509 PHOENIXͲCENTRAL&ADAMSSURFACELOT 26,193 112Ͳ28Ͳ131 ParkingLot 706 TERIJONESWAGNONREVOCABLETRUST 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ166 1,149
118 FEDͲFederalBuilding 89,516 112Ͳ21Ͳ079A 10,000 315 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,873 112Ͳ21Ͳ614 1,873 510 424NORTHCENTRALAVELLC 7,001 112Ͳ28Ͳ130 24,871 707 PONDLIVINGTRUST 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ167 1,520
119 101NORTHFIRSTAVELLC 22,212 112Ͳ21Ͳ089A ParkingLot 316 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,119 112Ͳ21Ͳ615 2,119 511 AGPONENORTHCENTRALOWNERLLC 56,971 112Ͳ28Ͳ132 833,326 708 FARAHMANDROGER 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ168 1,426
120 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,376 112Ͳ21Ͳ376 1,376 317 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ616 1,394 512 PHOENIXͲHyattGarage 20,625 112Ͳ28Ͳ071 101,251 709 MULVIHILLJOSEPH 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ169 900
121 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 541 112Ͳ21Ͳ377 541 318 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ617 1,394 513 PHOENIXͲHyattGarage 20,625 112Ͳ28Ͳ066 101,251 710 SIDLOWJAIMIEI 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ170 1,020
122 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 726 112Ͳ21Ͳ378 726 319 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 2,088 112Ͳ21Ͳ618 2,088 514 THREEEONENORTHFIRSTINVESTMENTCOLL 8,941 112Ͳ28Ͳ067 SeeID#516 711 LAMBEAUMICHELLE 1,030 112Ͳ42Ͳ171 996
123 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,326 112Ͳ21Ͳ380 1,308 320 44MONROEMARKETINGLLC 14,946 112Ͳ21Ͳ582A CommonArea 515 THREEEONENORTHFIRSTINVESTMENTCOLL 4,817 112Ͳ28Ͳ072 SeeID#516 712 ONͲCALLSOLUTIONSLLC 1,558 112Ͳ42Ͳ172 1,463
124 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ381 1,159 321 MARICOPACOUNTY 27,105 112Ͳ21Ͳ072C 272,909 516 THREEEONENORTHFIRSTINVESTMENTCOLL 3,440 112Ͳ28Ͳ073 140,714 713 WOODRUFFJAYSONREACE/CHRISTINADARYL 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ173 1,412
125 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,344 112Ͳ21Ͳ382 1,322 322 RBPHOENIXLLC 13,351 112Ͳ21Ͳ070 78,059 517 LIEBHABERFAMILYPARTNERSHIP 3,440 112Ͳ28Ͳ068 SeeID#516 714 EASLEYJAMESKAIMANA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ174 1,074
126 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,308 112Ͳ21Ͳ383 1,308 323 VIOLALORDSMEERLP 87,750 112Ͳ28Ͳ031B 792,578 518 LIEBHABERFAMILYPARTNERSHIP 3,440 112Ͳ28Ͳ069 20,775 715 LORDEUSMAKENSLEY 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ175 1,076
127 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ384 1,159 324 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ089 2,828 519 LIEBHABERFAMILYPARTNERSHIP 3,440 112Ͳ28Ͳ070 2,604 716 ROCHETAM 1,142 112Ͳ42Ͳ176 1,142
128 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,322 112Ͳ21Ͳ385 1,322 325 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ090 2,828 520 132PALALLC 3,383 112Ͳ28Ͳ074 9,249 717 DEMBECKTERRY/THOMAS 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ177 1,520
129 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 994 112Ͳ21Ͳ386 994 326 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ091 2,828 521 CHAVESTORSLLC 3,517 112Ͳ28Ͳ075 4,138 718 MARKHFRAMPTONLIVINGTRUST 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ178 1,426
130 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,117 112Ͳ21Ͳ387 1,126 327 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ092 2,828 522 PETERGUSGLLC/SAHNASCHARLEST/KATHERINEETAL 6,884 112Ͳ28Ͳ076 14,989 719 BRAINARDCALEB/VOLRICHMICHELLE 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ179 900
131 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 743 112Ͳ21Ͳ388 743 328 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ093 2,828 523 PHOENIXͲC.GoodeBldg. 149,803 112Ͳ22Ͳ074A 225,650 720 MANDTKATHYMICHELLE/CHADEDWARD 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ180 1,020
132 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 743 112Ͳ21Ͳ389 743 329 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ094 2,828 524 MARICOPACOUNTYͲOldCourthouse 56,336 112Ͳ22Ͳ075A 91,061 721 RINALDIMICHAEL 1,070 112Ͳ42Ͳ181 996
133 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,115 112Ͳ21Ͳ390 1,126 330 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ095 2,828 525 722 BTMSREVOCABLETRUST 1,589 112Ͳ42Ͳ182 1,412
134 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 965 112Ͳ21Ͳ391 965 331 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ096 2,828 526 723 MADISONALAN&DOROTHEA 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ183 1,412
135 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ392 1,310 332 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ097 2,828 527 724 BOREHAMAKIRA/PATRICIA 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ184 1,074
136 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ393 1,159 333 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ098 2,828 528 LUHRSINVESTORSLLC 32,214 112Ͳ22Ͳ105b 53,222 725 LACHEMANNJAMES/ELIZABETH 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ185 1,076
137 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ394 1,323 334 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ099 2,828 529 PEGPHXJEFFERSONSTREETLLC 13,124 112Ͳ22Ͳ105c 103,377 726 SCHMITZROBERTW 1,177 112Ͳ42Ͳ186 1,149
138 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ395 993 335 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ100 2,828 530 727 AXELRODGREGORYS/HEIDI 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ187 1,520
139 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ396 1,126 336 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ101 2,828 531 728 WHITEGREGORY 1,625 112Ͳ42Ͳ188 1,426
140 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ397 1,394 337 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ102 2,828 532 729 LEEROBERT 953 112Ͳ42Ͳ189 900
141 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ398 1,394 338 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ103 2,828 533 730 ENTRUSTNEWENGLANDLLC 1,085 112Ͳ42Ͳ190 1,020
142 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ399 1,126 339 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ104 2,828 534 731 JTMTRUST 1,070 112Ͳ42Ͳ191 996
143 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ400 962 340 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ105 2,828 535 732 LEWISTONYC 1,589 112Ͳ42Ͳ192 1,412
144 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ401 1,310 341 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ106 2,828 536 733 CHEESEMANDAVID 1,580 112Ͳ42Ͳ193 1,412
145 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ402 1,159 342 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ107 2,828 537 734 HASTINGSJAY/KIMBERLY 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ194 1,074
146 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ403 1,323 343 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ108 2,828 538 PHOENIXͲCONVCTRSOUTH 403,744 112Ͳ30Ͳ123 351,268 735 DIANEKSCHWILLINGLIVINGTRUST 1,160 112Ͳ42Ͳ195 1,076
147 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ404 993 344 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ109 2,828 539 PHOENIXͲCivicPlazaEastGar 236,661 112Ͳ30Ͳ127 1,219,400 736 EYCHANERRICH 1,177 112Ͳ42Ͳ196 1,149
148 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ405 1,126 345 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ110 2,828 540 MARICOPACOUNTYͲSuperiorCourtComp. 209,552 112Ͳ22Ͳ049B 807,458 737 GOODWINDEBRA&LINDA 1,707 112Ͳ42Ͳ197 1,520
149 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ406 1,394 346 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ111 2,828 541 738 DUNHAMRUSSELLTOBIN 1,812 112Ͳ42Ͳ198 1,812
150 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,394 112Ͳ21Ͳ407 1,394 347 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ112 2,828 542 LUHRSINVESTORSLLC 29,563 112Ͳ24Ͳ216A 142,386 739 BUNGERROBERT 1,405 112Ͳ42Ͳ199 1,405
151 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,126 112Ͳ21Ͳ408 1,126 348 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ113 2,828 542A HHLUHRSLLC 15,728 112Ͳ24Ͳ217A 240,269 740 BARTUSKASCOTT 1,418 112Ͳ42Ͳ200 1,418
152 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 962 112Ͳ21Ͳ409 962 349 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ114 2,828 543 JEFFERSONPLACEPARTNERSLLC 7,500 112Ͳ27Ͳ060A 47,219 741 DONATROBERT 1,899 112Ͳ42Ͳ201 1,899
153 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,310 112Ͳ21Ͳ410 1,310 350 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ115 2,828 544 JEFFERSONPLACEPARTNERSLLC 7,500 112Ͳ27Ͳ058A ParkingLot 742 MYLANDSTEVE 1,532 112Ͳ42Ͳ202 1,532
154 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,159 112Ͳ21Ͳ411 1,159 351 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ116 2,828 545 JEFFERSONPLACEPARTNERSLLC 4,062 112Ͳ27Ͳ056B ParkingLot 743 OSBYEDMUNDJ/CHARLENER 1,533 112Ͳ42Ͳ203 1,533
155 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 1,323 112Ͳ21Ͳ412 1,323 352 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ117 2,828 546 JEFFERSONPLACEPARTNERSLLC 11,995 112Ͳ27Ͳ055E ParkingLot 744 SABATULISSA 1,981 112Ͳ42Ͳ204 1,981
156 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC 993 112Ͳ21Ͳ413 993 353 PHOENIXͲ201NORTHCENTRALAVENUEPROPERTYLLC 2,828 112Ͳ28Ͳ118 2,828 547 JOHNEGARRETSONLIVINGTRUST/ETAL 12,813 112Ͳ27Ͳ052C ParkingLot 745 SCHMIDTRONALD/SUSAN 1,405 112Ͳ42Ͳ205 1,405
157 44MONROEAPARTMENTSLLC  1,126




W




Page 121



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend Ordinance Authorizing Mayo Clinic Arizona Development Agreement for
Installation for Public Infrastructure Improvements (Ordinance S-50275)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Ordinance S-48386
to extend Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT) reimbursement period in contemplated
Development Agreement with Mayo Clinic Arizona (Mayo) or its affiliates from 35 to 40
years.

Summary
At its March 2, 2022, meeting, City Council approved the terms of a Development
Agreement (DA) with Mayo for the construction of Discovery Oasis, including
reimbursement of public infrastructure approved by the City. Discovery Oasis is
planned to be a 228-acre bioscience park that will bring a significant number of high-
wage jobs and capital investment in the bioscience and health care arena. The funds
for reimbursement will come from the eligible General Fund share of the TPT created
by the project, not to exceed $40 million.

As Mayo has conducted further research and analysis of the public infrastructure
needed for development of the property immediately adjacent to its existing north
Phoenix campus, it has been determined that extensive flood mitigation infrastructure
is required to maximize development. To facilitate the installation of this flood control
infrastructure, staff proposes extending the DA reimbursement period from 35 years to
40 years to allow Mayo more time to recover the funds to be expended up-front on the
public infrastructure, which will include the flood mitigation. All other terms and
conditions of the DA will remain in place.

Contract Term
The term of the Development Agreement will increase from 35 years to 40 years after
the City’s acceptance of the public infrastructure improvements and drainage
solutions.

Financial Impact
There is no additional financial impact to the General Fund. The maximum
reimbursement from the eligible General Fund share of TPT revenue will remain at $40
million.


Page 122


Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The terms of the initial Development Agreement were approved at the March 2, 2022,

Location
Generally located on approximately 228 acres south of Loop 101; east of 56th St.;
west of 64th St., and as described in the Arizona State Land Department Auction No.
53-122049
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.




Page 123



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Mayo Clinic Arizona Hospital Development Agreement Amendment (Ordinance S
-50276)

Authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to amend the 1996 Mayo Clinic
Development Agreement (DA) with Mayo Clinic Arizona (Mayo) to allow any unused
construction sales tax credit to be applied to public infrastructure reimbursement in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Discovery Oasis development
agreement (Discovery Oasis DA) in addition to existing authorized reimbursement for
permit/plan review fees under the 1996 Mayo DA.

Summary
The City and Mayo entered into the DA on January 3,1996, City Contract No. 72047.
The DA provided for the construction of the Mayo Hospital Campus, which continues
new phases today. Mayo is currently completing construction on a new $748 million
capital investment into the Hospital Campus. Modifications to the DA have been
approved by the City Council on five separate occasions. The original DA represents a
50-year term.

At its March 2, 2022 Formal Meeting, City Council approved the terms of a subsequent
development agreement with Mayo for the construction of Discovery Oasis. Discovery
Oasis is planned to be a 228-acre bioscience and healthcare park surrounding the
Hospital Campus. The terms of the Discovery Oasis DA provide for reimbursement of
public infrastructure that is approved by the City. The funds for reimbursement will
come from the General Fund share of the Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT) created by
the project. The amount of reimbursement to Mayo for the public infrastructure
improvements will not exceed $40 million.

As part of the 1996 DA, the City committed to constructing 64th St. from the Loop 101
freeway to Bell Road when certain conditions were met. Given the new development of
Discovery Oasis and the continued Hospital Campus expansion, the need for the
construction of 64th St. is imminent. Further, significant amounts of public infrastructure
including additional construction on Mayo Blvd., 56th St. and 64th St., as well as
drainage, water and wastewater infrastructure are required for the future development
of this Mayo/Discovery Oasis campus and will benefit the surrounding area.



Page 124

Contract Term
Due to the significant amounts of public infrastructure required to allow both the
Hospital Campus and Discovery Oasis to maximize their development, staff proposes
amending the 1996 Hospital Agreement with following terms:

· In addition to any use by Mayo of the construction sales tax credit under the DA,
the construction sales tax credit may be used to reimburse Mayo for the following:
(1) any portion of the cost to construct the 64th St. improvements that Mayo is
required to pay under the Discovery Oasis Agreement; and (2) for any of the Public
Infrastructure Reimbursements as defined in the Discovery Oasis Agreement.
Mayo can use the Unused Reimbursement Credit under the DA until any one of
the following is triggered (a) the date the Discovery Oasis DA expires or
(b) the date the Unused Reimbursement Credit is exhausted or (c) the $40 million
Discovery Oasis DA cap is met.

· For the purposes of public infrastructure improvement reimbursement only, the
Hospital Development Agreement termination date will be modified to automatically
terminate with the earlier of the date the Discovery Oasis Agreement expires or the
date the construction sales tax credit is exhausted.

· During the additional term created by this action, only public infrastructure
improvements will be reimbursable. All other terms and conditions of the 1996 DA
will remain in effect and sunset with the original date of that agreement.

Financial Impact
There is no additional financial impact to the General Fund. The maximum
reimbursement from the eligible General Fund share of TPT revenue from the
Discovery Oasis DA will remain at $40 million.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Authorization to enter into the original Mayo Clinic Development Agreement was
received on Sept. 20, 1995, through Ordinance S-23079.

Location
Generally located on approximately 225 acres at the southeast corner of 56th St. and
Mayo Blvd.
Council District(s): 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.


Page 125



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Series 2023 Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program (Resolution 22159)

Request City Council approval for (1) the issuance and sale of single family mortgage
revenue bonds, (2) the related Standards and Requirements (Attachment A) and
General Plan (Attachment B), and (3) the execution of a
Cooperative/Intergovernmental Agreement (Attachment C).

Summary
Request City Council adoption of a resolution (Attachment D) granting approval of the
proceedings under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix,
Arizona (the “Phoenix IDA”) has previously resolved to issue up to $200,000,000 of the
Series 2023 Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds (the “Series 2023 Program
Bonds”), to be jointly issued with The Industrial Development Authority of the County of
Maricopa (the “Maricopa IDA”) in multiple series pursuant to a plan of finance (the
“Series 2023 Program”).
The Phoenix IDA and Maricopa IDA propose to use the proceeds of the Series 2023
Program Bonds to finance mortgage loans and homebuyer assistance for single family
homes to be owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income in Maricopa
County, including the City of Phoenix.

In accordance with the Industrial Development Financing Act, the Standards and
Requirements and General Plan adopted by the Phoenix IDA for the Series 2023
Program Bonds and Series 2023 Program require the approval of City Council.

The Phoenix IDA and Maricopa IDA intend to jointly issue the Series 2023 Program
Bonds to implement the Series 2023 Program benefiting the citizens of their combined
jurisdictions pursuant to the Cooperative/Intergovernmental Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, City
Council must approve the issuance of the Series 2023 Program Bonds after a public
hearing following reasonable public notice. The public hearing is being held by a
representative of the Phoenix IDA on Oct. 10, 2023.




Page 126

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Series 2023 Program
Bonds, approve the Standards and Requirements and General Plan, and approve
entering into the Cooperative/Intergovernmental Agreement at its meeting held on
Sept. 21, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer.




Page 127
ATTACHMENT A

The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona and
The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Maricopa

Series 2023 Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program

STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS

Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Section 35-706.D., The Industrial Development
Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona and The Industrial Development Authority of the County
of Maricopa (collectively, the “Authorities”) have established the following Standards and
Requirements for the financing of mortgage loans (the “Mortgage Loans”) pursuant to the
Authorities’ Series 2023 Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program (the “Program”). The
bonds issued to finance the Program (the “Program Bonds”) are to be issued and the Program is
to be administered in accordance with Title 35, Chapter 5, Arizona Revised Statutes (the “Act”),
and certain Program Bonds may be “qualified mortgage bonds” as defined in Section 143 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”), and bear interest which is excluded
from gross income for federal income tax purposes. The Authorities intend to issue the Program
Bonds in multiple series/subseries pursuant to a plan of finance. The proceeds of the Program
Bonds are to be used to finance mortgage loans on residences in all areas within Maricopa County,
Arizona, including within the City of Phoenix, Arizona, but not in any incorporated city or town
which exercises its statutory right to prohibit mortgage loans financed by the Program on
residences within its boundaries (the “Mortgage Loans”).

Any and all portions of these Standards and Requirements are subject to change from time
to time as approved by the Authorities in accordance with the Act.

1. Eligibility of Mortgage Lenders. In order to be eligible to originate Mortgage
Loans pursuant to the Program, each participating mortgage lender (collectively, the “Lenders”)
must:

(a) Be approved as a mortgagee by the Federal Housing Administration
(“FHA”), the United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Housing Service (“RHS”),
and/or the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), and be approved as sellers and servicers
of mortgage loans by Fannie Mae (formerly knowns as the Federal National Mortgage
Association) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), as
required by the Act.

(b) Be approved as a mortgagee by the United States Department of Housing
and Urban Development (“HUD”), if the Lender is to originate Mortgage Loans guaranteed
by HUD.

(c) Be organized and existing under the laws of the State, another state, or the
United States and be qualified to do business in the State as required by the Act.




4892-4479-0397.4

Page 128
(d) Agree to such terms and conditions as shall be approved by the Authorities
and set forth in one or more Program guides for the origination of Mortgage Loans
(collectively, the “Origination Guide”).

The Authorities may permit nonprofit organizations to participate in the Program by
agreement with one or more Lenders having the qualifications set forth above.

Mortgage Loans originated by the Lenders will be acquired from the Lenders by the loan
servicer for the Program (the “Servicer”) and serviced by the Servicer. The trustee (the “Trustee”)
under the trust indenture pursuant to which the Program Bonds will be issued (the “Indenture”)
will acquire from the Servicer guaranteed mortgage certificates (“Certificates”) backed by
Mortgage Loans originated by Lenders and sold to the Servicer. The Certificates will be
guaranteed as to timely payment of principal interest by the Government National Mortgage
Association (“GNMA”), Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, other approved issuers of Certificates or other
credit enhancement. The Trustee will also reimburse the Servicer for second-lien mortgage loans
made by the Authorities in connection with a first Mortgage Loan backing a Certificate to finance
a Mortgagor’s (as defined below) down payment and closing costs with respect such first Mortgage
Loan (each a “DPA Second-Lien Mortgage Loan”). The Lenders must originate each Mortgage
Loan in conformity with the requirements of FHA, RHS, VA, the United States Department of
Agriculture, HUD Section 184, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other credit enhancer, as applicable,
existing at the time of such origination.

2. Time Period for Disbursements for Mortgage Loans. Generally, Lenders must
originate and deliver Mortgage Loans within the period or periods set forth in the Origination
Guide and, with respect to any tax-exempt Program Bonds, the period or periods set forth in the
Tax Code.

3. Character of Residences. The character of the residences to be financed by
Mortgage Loans will be residences permitted under the Act, provided that any residences financed
by Mortgage Loans which are, in turn, financed with the proceeds of tax-exempt Program Bonds
shall also satisfy the requirements of the Tax Code and the regulations thereunder.

4. Eligibility of Persons of Low and Moderate Income. Participating mortgagors (the
“Mortgagors”) in the Program:

(a) Must have a family income at the time of origination of the Mortgage Loan
not in excess of the maximum amount to be established from time to time by the
Authorities, which amount, subject to adjustment by the Authorities if and to the extent
permitted by applicable law, shall not exceed either the amount permitted by the Act or,
for Mortgage Loans financed with the proceeds of tax-exempt Program Bonds, the amount
permitted by the Tax Code.

(b) As and to the extent required by the Act, must not have received, during the
three-year period immediately preceding the date of origination of the Mortgage Loan,
another Mortgage Loan financed directly or indirectly from the proceeds of obligations
issued by the Authorities under the Act.



4892-4479-0397.4

Page 129
(c) As and to the extent required by the Tax Code for Mortgage Loans financed
with the proceeds of tax-exempt Program Bonds, must not have had an ownership interest
in a principal residence at any time during the three-year period ending on the date of
execution of the Mortgage Loan, except that this requirement does not apply to any
Mortgage Loan for a target area residence or to any qualified rehabilitation loan or
qualified-home improvement loan (each as defined in the Tax Code) or to a qualified
veteran (as defined in 38 U.S.C. Section 101).

(d) As and to the extent required by the Tax Code for Mortgage Loans financed
with the proceeds of tax-exempt Program Bonds and as permitted by FHA, RHS, VA,
GNMA, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other credit enhancer, if a Mortgagor is assuming a
Mortgage Loan previously financed in the Program, the assuming mortgagor must meet
the tests provided for in paragraph 3 and in paragraphs 4(a), 4(b) and 4(c), and the purchase
price for the residence must not be in excess of the applicable maximum purchase price on
the date of assumption.

5. Terms and conditions of the Mortgage Loans. Each Mortgage Loan:

(a) Will have a term of not to exceed 30 years.

(b) Will provide for approximately level monthly payments for principal and
interest for the life of the Mortgage Loan.

(c) Will have an interest rate not greater than 12.0% per annum and may
provide down payment and closing cost assistance in the form of a DPA Second-Lien
Mortgage Loan in an amount not to exceed 5.0% of the principal amount of the Mortgage
Loan.

(d) May be assumable, subject to the requirements described in paragraph 4(d).

(e) Will be secured by a first lien on the property financed by the Mortgage
Loan and satisfy either or both of the credit or credit enhancement requirements of the
Program as set forth in the Origination Guide.

(f) May have an interest rate buy-down to the extent permitted by FHA, RHS,
VA, HUD, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, as applicable.

6. Insurance. The following amounts and types of insurance will be required:

(a) On each Mortgage Loan, FHA insurance, a VA guarantee, an RHS
guarantee, a HUD Section 184 guarantee or such private mortgage guaranty insurance as
may be required by GNMA, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other credit enhancer, as
applicable.

(b) On the property financed by each Mortgage Loan, such casualty insurance
and flood insurance as may be required by FHA, VA, RHS, HUD, GNMA, Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac or other credit enhancer, as applicable.


4892-4479-0397.4

Page 130
(c) An American Land Title Association approved mortgage guaranty title
insurance policy in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount of each
Mortgage Loan insuring title to the real property financed by such Mortgage Loan, subject
to customary exceptions.

(d) Any other insurance required by FHA, VA, RHS, HUD, GNMA, Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac or other credit enhancer, as applicable.

If deemed advisable by the Authorities, financial guaranty insurance may be obtained on
all or a portion of any series/subseries of the Program Bonds.

7. Representations and Warranties of Mortgage Lenders. In order to insure
compliance with these Standards and Requirements, each Lender shall make representations or
warranties to the Authorities with regard to such Lender’s eligibility to participate in the Program
and such other matters deemed appropriate by the Authorities, which representations and
warranties shall be provided for in the Origination Guide.

8. Restrictions as to Interest Rate, Terms of Mortgage Loans and Return Realized
by Mortgage Lenders. The stated interest rate on the Mortgage Loans shall be determined by the
Authorities from time to time and shall not exceed the maximum rates described in paragraph 5(c).
Other terms and conditions of the Mortgage Loans shall be as provided in paragraphs 4 and 5
hereof.

Each Lender originating a Mortgage Loan may charge (to the extent permitted by
applicable law), subject to further limitation by the Authorities:

(a) An origination fee not to exceed 1.0% of the unpaid principal amount of the
Mortgage Loan which may be collected and retained by the Lender from the Mortgagor in
connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan.

(b) Discount points not to exceed 1.0% of the unpaid principal amount of the
Mortgage Loan.

(c) Closing costs customarily and usually charged by lenders in originating and
processing comparable mortgage loans in Maricopa County not financed through tax-
exempt bond programs.

(d) If the Lender has paid an extension fee for a longer origination period for
origination of a Mortgage Loan for new construction, an amount equal to such extension
fee.

The purchase price for each Mortgage Loan paid to the Lender by the Servicer will
reimburse the Lender for any down payment and closing cost assistance advanced by the Lender
to the Mortgagor in connection with a DPA Second-Lien Mortgage Loan, if applicable, and
provide the Lender with a net compensation, including the 1.0% origination fee described in (i)
above and the discount points described in (ii) above, not to exceed 2.50% of the purchased
Mortgage Loan.


4892-4479-0397.4

Page 131
The Servicer will service Mortgage Loans. The Servicer shall retain from the monthly
payments on each Mortgage Loan a servicing fee in an amount not to exceed 1.00% per annum of
the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loans serviced. The Servicer will pay all
GNMA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fees with respect to the Mortgage Loans from such servicing
fee.

9. Collateral Security. The Trustee, on behalf of the Authorities, will disburse
Program Bond proceeds to acquire Certificates and to reimburse DPA Second-Lien Mortgage
Loans. The Program Bonds will be limited obligations of the Authorities payable from and secured
by all right, title and interest of the Authorities in and to the Certificates, the Mortgage Loans, the
DPA Second-Lien Mortgage Loans, the revenues pledged under the Indenture, the net proceeds of
the sale of each series/subseries of the Program Bonds and other moneys on deposit in funds held
by the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture. Each Mortgage Loan will be secured by a first lien
Mortgage on the residence financed. Each DPA Second-Lien Mortgage Loan will be secured a
second lien Mortgage on the residence financed.

10. Assignment of Mortgage Loans to the Trustee. Pursuant to the Indenture, the
Trustee will purchase and/or reimburse Certificates and DPA Second-Lien Mortgages, as
applicable, in order to finance the origination of Mortgage Loans by the Lenders. The Trustee
shall act on behalf of the Authorities as provided in the Indenture and, as and to the extent required
by the Act, shall be (i) either a bank or trust company qualified to do business in the State, having
an officially reported combined capital surplus, undivided profits and reserves of not less that
$15,000,000, and (ii) approved to sell mortgages to and to service mortgages for GNMA, Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac.

11. Other Matters. Standards and requirements not set forth above shall be set forth in
the Authorities’ general plan for the Program, the Origination Guide, one or more guides for the
servicing of Mortgage Loans, the Indenture, the resolutions providing for the issuance of the
Program Bonds, and the Authorities’ Master Mortgage Purchase Agreement, all in form and
substance to be approved by the Authorities.



[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]




4892-4479-0397.4

Page 132
The foregoing Standards and Requirements were established by The Industrial
Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona and by The Industrial Development
Authority of the County of Maricopa on the date(s) indicated below.


THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX,
ARIZONA


By:
Name: Juan Salgado
Its: Chief Executive Officer
Date: September 21, 2023


THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF
MARICOPA


By:
Name: Shelby Scharbach
Its: Executive Director
Date: October 10, 2023




[SIGNATURE PAGE TO STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS]




4892-4479-0397.4

Page 133
ATTACHMENT B

The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona and
The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Maricopa

Series 2023 Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program

GENERAL PLAN

In connection with the hereinafter-described Program, The Industrial Development
Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona and The Industrial Development Authority of the County
of Maricopa (the “Authorities”) propose to issue one or more series of bonds (the “Program
Bonds”) the proceeds of which are to be used to finance mortgage loans (“Mortgage Loans”) to
acquire residences in all areas within Maricopa County, Arizona (“Maricopa County”), including
within the City of Phoenix, Arizona, but not within any city or town which exercises its statutory
right to prohibit mortgage loans financed with proceeds of the Program Bonds within its
boundaries.

The Program Bonds are to be issued for the purpose of funding the Authorities’ Series 2023
Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program (the “Program”) for persons of low and
moderate income residing in Maricopa County. The Program Bonds are to be issued and the
Program administered in accordance with Title 35, Chapter 5, Arizona Revised Statutes (the
“Act”), and certain Program Bonds may be “qualified mortgage bonds” as defined in Section 143
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”), and bear interest which is
excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. The Authorities intend to issue the
Program Bonds in multiple series/subseries pursuant to a plan of finance.

The following paragraphs discuss the specific matters required by Arizona Revised
Statutes Section 35-726.A. to be described in this General Plan. Statutory references are to
particular provisions of such Section. Any and all portions of the General Plan are subject to
change from time to time as approved by the Authorities and in accordance with the Act.

1. The Amount of the Proposed Program Bonds: Section 35-726.A.1. The aggregate
principal amount of all series/subseries of the proposed Program Bonds will not exceed
$200,000,000.

2. The Maximum Term of the Program Bonds: Section 35-726.A.2. The term of
each series/subseries of the Program Bonds will not exceed 40 years.

3. The Maximum Interest Rate on the Program Bonds: Section 35-726.A.3. The
maximum effective interest rate on each series/subseries of the Program Bonds (taking into
account initial issue premium and discount) is not expected to exceed 10.0% per annum. The
Authorities do not intend to proceed with the issuance of a particular series/subseries of the
Program Bonds unless, in the judgment of the Authorities, such series/subseries of the Program
Bonds can be underwritten, on a basis consistent with standards of housing finance prevailing at
the time of such issuance, at an interest cost (taking into consideration costs of issuance,


4873-4490-2269.4

Page 134
underwriters’ compensation and additional discounts, if any, on such series/subseries of the
Program Bonds) that will permit the Mortgage Loans to be (a) originated at an interest rate not
greater than 12.0% per annum and with down payment and closing cost assistance in an amount
not to exceed 5.0% of the principal amount of the Mortgage Loan, and (b) financed in the Program
on the terms and at the prices referred to in paragraph 5 below.

4. The Need for the Program Bond Issue: Section 35-726.A.4. The Authorities have
determined that within Maricopa County there is a critical shortage of housing within the financial
means of persons and families of low and moderate income; that this shortage constitutes a threat
to the health, safety and welfare of all residents of Maricopa County, contributes to the growth of
slum and blighted areas and inhibits the sound economic growth of Maricopa County; that this
shortage deprives Maricopa County and the incorporated cities and towns therein of an adequate
tax base, results in excessive unemployment and depressed economic conditions and causes
Maricopa County, the incorporated cities and towns therein and the State of Arizona (the “State”)
to make excessive expenditures for crime prevention and control, public health, welfare and safety
and other public services; and that this shortage of affordable housing can be relieved through the
encouragement of investment and lending by private enterprise and the use of financing as
described herein.

5. The Terms and Conditions for Originating or Purchasing Mortgage Loans:
Section 35-726.A.5. Mortgage Loans will be originated by qualified lenders (the “Lenders”).
Mortgage Loans may be financed through the purchase of guaranteed mortgage certificates
(“Certificates”) backed by the Mortgage Loans and guaranteed as to timely payment of principal
and interest by the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), Fannie Mae
(formerly known as the Federal National Mortgage Association), the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), other approved issuers of Certificates or other credit
enhancement in accordance with one or more Program guidelines approved by the Authorities for
origination of the Mortgage Loans (collectively, the “Origination Guide”) or through the
purchase of second-lien mortgage loans, made in connection with a first Mortgage Loan backing
a Certificate, to finance the mortgagor’s down payment and closing costs with respect to such first
Mortgage Loan backing a Certificate (each, a “DPA Second-Lien Mortgage Loan”).

(a) In order to qualify for the Program, a Lender must be a bank, trust company,
mortgage company, mortgage banker, national banking association, savings bank, savings
and loan association, building and loan association or any other financial institution which
is qualified to do business in the State as required by the Act, must be currently approved
as a mortgagee by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), the United States
Department of Agriculture, Rural Housing Service (“RHS”), and/or the Department of
Veterans Affairs (“VA”) and as a seller and servicer of mortgage loans by Fannie Mae or
Freddie Mac, as required by the Act, and be approved as a mortgagee by the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), if the Lender is to originate
Mortgage Loans guaranteed by HUD. The Authorities may permit nonprofit organizations
to participate in the Program by agreements with one or more Lenders having the
qualifications set forth in the preceding sentence.




4873-4490-2269.4

Page 135
(b) Each Mortgage Loan must be originated in conformity with the
requirements of FHA, RHS, VA, HUD Section 184, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other
credit enhancer, as applicable. The mortgage instrument relating to each Mortgage Loan
must create a first lien on a residence (a “Mortgage”), subject to permitted encumbrances,
and be made substantially in accordance with the standards of FHA, RHS, VA, HUD,
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other credit enhancement, as applicable.

(c) Each Mortgage Loan shall provide for approximately level monthly
payments over the life of the Mortgage Loan of approximately 30 years. Sellers of
residences and mortgagors will be permitted to provide for interest buy-downs on
Mortgage Loans to the extent permitted by FHA, RHS, VA, HUD, Fannie Mae or Freddie
Mac, as applicable, as provided in the Origination Guide.

(d) Generally, the Lenders must originate and deliver Mortgage Loans within
the period or periods set forth in the Origination Guide and, with respect to any tax-exempt
Program Bonds, the period or periods set forth in the Tax Code. To the extent required by
the Tax Code, up to 20% of the funds from each series of the Program Bonds available to
finance Mortgage Loans will be made available for one year to finance Mortgage Loans on
target area residences (as defined in the Tax Code) (“Target Area Loans”) and after such
one year period will be available to finance all Mortgage Loans. As and to the extent
required by the Act, in areas other than a redevelopment area, 30% of the funds from each
series of the Program Bonds available to finance Mortgage Loans will be set aside for 60
days to finance Mortgage Loans for persons and families whose income is below the
median family income of the State. As and to the extent required by the Act, 10% of the
funds from each series of the Program Bonds available to finance Mortgage Loans will be
set aside for three months to finance Mortgage Loans on manufactured housing.
Notwithstanding the forgoing, the Authorities may provide for the origination of Mortgage
Loans in such Target Areas and for other set-asides in such other manner which, in the
opinion of counsel, will not adversely affect the exclusion of interest on any Program
Bonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes and/or is consistent with the Act.

(e) Each Mortgage Loan must be approved by the loan servicer for the Program
(the “Servicer”) and the program administrator for the Program (the “Program
Administrator”) for compliance with Program requirements.

(f) In connection with each Mortgage Loan, the Lender is required to make
certain warranties or representation with respect to the eligibility of the residence and the
mortgagor under the Program requirements, the due recording and terms of the Mortgage
securing the Mortgage Loan, the applicability of certain insurance described in paragraph
8 below, and the current status of and title to the property and other warranties and
representations customarily made in privately funded mortgage banking transactions.

(g) The purchase price for Mortgage Loans approved by the Servicer and the
Program Administrator is described in paragraph 7(a) below.




4873-4490-2269.4

Page 136
(h) The mortgagors under a Mortgage Loan must make a down payment of an
amount sufficient to comply with existing requirements of VA, RHS, FHA, HUD, Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac or other credit enhancement, as applicable.

6. The Area in Which the Single Family Dwelling Units to be Financed May be
Located: Section 35-726.A.6. The general location of the dwelling units will be throughout
Maricopa County, subject to certain reservations and limitations.

7. The Proposed Fees, Charges and Expenditures To Be Paid for Originators,
Servicers, Trustee, Custodians, Mortgage Administrators and Others: Section 35-726.A.7. The
following fees, charges and expenditures are proposed to be imposed in connection with the
Program:

(a) Originators: Each Lender originating a Mortgage Loan may charge (to the
extent permitted by applicable law):

(i) An origination fee not to exceed 1.0% of the unpaid principal
amount of the Mortgage Loan which may be collected and retained by the Lender
from the mortgagor in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan.

(ii) Discount points not to exceed 1.0% of the unpaid principal amount
of the Mortgage Loan.

(iii) Closing costs customarily and usually charged by lenders in
originating and processing comparable mortgage loans in Maricopa County not
financed through tax-exempt bond programs.

(iv) If the Lender has paid an extension fee for a longer origination
period for origination of a Mortgage Loan for new construction, an amount equal
to such extension fee.

The purchase price for each Mortgage Loan paid to the Lender by the Servicer will
reimburse the Lender for any down payment and closing cost assistance advanced by the
Lender to the mortgagor in connection with a DPA Second-Lien Mortgage Loan, if
applicable, and provide the Lender with a net compensation, including the 1.0% origination
fee described in (a)(i) above and the discount points described in (a)(ii) above, not to exceed
2.50% of the purchased Mortgage Loan.

(b) Servicer: The Servicer shall retain from the monthly payments on each
Mortgage Loan a servicing fee in an amount not to exceed 1.00% per annum of the
outstanding principal amount of such Mortgage Loan. The Servicer will pay all GNMA,
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fees with respect to Mortgage Loans from such servicing fee
(see “Other Parties” in (d) below). The Servicer may be paid reasonable compensation for
services as compliance agent to the extent permitted by the guide or guides approved by
the Authorities for servicing of the Mortgage Loans.



4873-4490-2269.4

Page 137
(c) Trustee: The trustee is to be paid reasonable compensation for all services
rendered as trustee and paying agent under the trust indenture pursuant to which the
Program Bonds will be issued (the “Indenture”) as well as reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses. Compensation will be paid from Program Bond proceeds and from moneys
available for such purposes under the Indenture, including investment earnings and
monthly payments of interest.

(d) Other Parties: The following additional fees and charges shall be paid ( to
the extent required by the Program):

(i) GNMA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be paid a guaranty fee in
consideration for their respective guarantees of the Certificates. Such fees will be
paid by the Servicer from the servicing fee described in (b) above.

(ii) An FHA insurance fee in the amount payable at such times as
prescribed by FHA in consideration for FHA insurance of Mortgage Loans. Such
fee will be paid by the mortgagor.

(iii) An RHS guaranty fee in the amount and payable at such times as
prescribed by RHS in consideration for RHS guaranty of Mortgage Loans. Such
fee will be paid by the mortgagor.

(iv) A fee, if any, owed to VA, as prescribed by VA, in exchange for the
VA guaranty of Mortgage Loans or HUD, as prescribed by HUD, in exchange for
the HUD Section 184 guaranty of Mortgage Loans. Such fee will be paid by the
mortgagor.

(v) A fee for private mortgage guaranty insurance policies required by
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Such a fee will be paid by the mortgagor.

(vi) The Program Administrator, if one or more is appointed by the
Authorities, is to be paid a reasonable fee for all services rendered as well as
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. Such fee will be paid by the mortgagor.

(e) Costs of Issuance: The costs of issuance for the Program are estimated not
to exceed an amount equal to the sum of 8.0% of the amount of any one or more
series/subseries of the Program Bonds sold at substantially the same time. These costs
include, among others, fees of bond counsel, counsel to the Authorities, counsel to the
underwriters, disclosure counsel and trustee’s counsel; fees and charges of the Program
Administrator and its counsel, the Servicer and its counsel, and the Authorities’ municipal
advisor; printing costs; costs of reproducing documents; filing and recording fees;
computer charges in structuring the Program; any expenses incurred by the Authorities in
relation to the issuance of the Program Bonds; expenses incurred in connection with
qualifying the Program Bonds for sale under the securities laws of various jurisdictions and
of preparing Blue Sky and legal investment memoranda; initial fees and charges of the
trustee as such, as bond registrar, and as paying agent; legal fees and charges; professional


4873-4490-2269.4

Page 138
consultants fees; costs of credit ratings; costs of the demand study, if any; fees and charges
for execution, transportation and safekeeping of Program Bonds; costs of advertising the
availability of funds; the fees for reports as to the status of the Mortgage Loans, the
Certificates and the Program; and other costs, charges and fees in connection with the
Program and for any of the foregoing.

(f) Compensation of Underwriters: The underwriters’ compensation for any
one or more series/subseries of the Program Bonds sold at substantially the same time
excluding any original issue discount will not exceed 1.0% of the principal amount of such
series/subseries of the Program Bonds issued.

(g) IDA Contribution. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the
Authorities may pay and/or fund any and all Program expenses, DPA Second Lien
Mortgage Loans, Costs of Issuance, reserves, fees, charges and expenditures described
herein from other legally available and authorized moneys of the Authorities contributed
to fund the Program (the “IDA Contribution”).

8. All Insurance Requirements with respect to Mortgage Loans, Mortgaged
Property, Mortgagors, Originators, Servicers and Trustees: Section 35-726.A.8. The following
amounts and types of insurance will be required:

(a) On each Mortgage Loan, FHA insurance, a VA guarantee, an RHS
guarantee, a HUD Section 184 guaranty or such private mortgage guaranty insurance as
may be required by GNMA, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other credit enhancement, as
applicable.

(b) On the property subject to each Mortgage, such casualty insurance and flood
insurance as may be required by FHA, VA, RHS, HUD, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other
credit enhancement, as applicable.

(c) An American Land Title Association-approved mortgage guaranty title
insurance policy in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount of the
Mortgage Loan insuring title to the real property subject to each Mortgage, subject to
customary exceptions.

(d) Any other insurance on Mortgage Loans and/or property subject to a
Mortgage required by FHA, VA, RHS, HUD, GNMA, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other
credit enhancement, as applicable.

(e) With respect to the Lenders and with respect to the Servicer, errors and
omission insurance and fidelity bonds, at their expense, in substance and amounts, if any,
as would be required by GNMA, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other credit enhancement.

(f) With respect to the trustee, none.




4873-4490-2269.4

Page 139
9. The Anticipated Date of Issuance of Program Bonds: Section 35-726.A.9. It is
anticipated that the initial series/subseries of the Program Bonds will be issued in connection with
the Program on or before December 31, 2023, and that all subsequent series/subseries of the
Program Bonds will be issued not later than June 30, 2025.




4873-4490-2269.4

Page 140
The foregoing General Plan was approved by The Industrial Development Authority of the
on the date(s) indicated below.

THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX,
ARIZONA


By:
Name: Juan Salgado
Its: Chief Executive Officer
Date: September 21, 2023


THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF
MARICOPA


By:
Name: Shelby Scharbach
Its: Executive Director
Date: October 10, 2023




[SIGNATURE PAGE TO GENERAL PLAN]




Page 141
ATTACHMENT C


COOPERATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
FOR
THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
AND THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA
SERIES 2023 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM


This COOPERATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT, dated and effective as of
October 18, 2023 (this “Agreement”), is between THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF
THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA (the “Phoenix Authority”), and THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA (the “Maricopa Authority” and, together with the Phoenix
Authority, the “Authorities”), each a nonprofit corporation recognized, existing under and designated as a
political subdivision of the State of Arizona, pursuant to the Industrial Development Financing Act, Title 35,
Chapter 5, of the Arizona Revised Statutes (the “Act”), the CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, an Arizona
municipal corporation (the “City”), and MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, a body politic and corporate of the
State of Arizona (the “County”).

RECITALS

A. The public purpose of the Phoenix Authority and the Maricopa Authority as expressed in the
legislative history of the Act, includes, among other things, the encouragement of investment and lending by
private enterprise for, and the stimulation of construction and rehabilitation of, housing for low and moderate
income families.

B. Under the Act, the Phoenix Authority and the Maricopa Authority have the power, either
individually or jointly, to issue single family mortgage revenue bonds and mortgage credit certificates.

C. The Authorities have determined that it is desirable to develop a meaningful home ownership
program to serve the needs of low and moderate income families and it is in the best interest of the citizens of
the City and Maricopa County to cooperate in the creation and implementation of a joint single family mortgage
revenue bond program for the entire Phoenix/Maricopa County area.

D. The Authorities intend to jointly issue mortgage revenue bonds in multiple series and subseries
(the “Series 2023 Program Bonds”) to implement the Series 2023 Program (as defined herein) pursuant to a plan
of finance approved by each of the Authorities to benefit the citizens of their combined jurisdictions during the
mortgage loan origination period to occur in the calendar years 2023, 2024 and 2025.

E. Consistent with the terms and conditions set forth below and as contained in the summary of Series
2023 Program terms, attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Program Summary”), and pursuant to Sections 11-952,
35-706.G and 35-761 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, the Phoenix Authority, the Maricopa Authority, the City and
the County desire to enter into this Agreement, specifying the terms and conditions under which the Authorities
agree to jointly create and implement the Series 2023 Program beginning in calendar year 2023.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, the Phoenix Authority, the Maricopa Authority, the City and the County hereby
agree as follows:

1. Definitions. The following words and phrases shall have the following meanings unless
otherwise expressed or provided or unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

“Administration Fees” means all issuer or administrative fees to be received by the Authorities under
the Indenture.


1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 142
“Agreement” means this Cooperative/Intergovernmental Agreement.

“Authority” means either the Phoenix Authority or the Maricopa Authority, as applicable.

“Authority Staff” means (i) in the case of the Phoenix Authority, Juan Salgado, Chief Executive Officer,
and Murray Boess, Chief Financial Officer, and (ii) in the case of the Maricopa Authority, Shelby Scharbach,
Executive Director, Gregg Ghelfi, Business Development Officer, Janis Larson, Administrator, and Mary Misic,
Administrator.

“City” means the City of Phoenix, Arizona.

“Co-Team Leaders” means (i) the representative acting on behalf of the Phoenix Authority as may be
appointed by the Phoenix Authority from time to time with written notice to the Maricopa Authority, and (ii) the
representative acting on behalf of the Maricopa Authority as may be appointed by the Maricopa Authority from
time to time with written notice to the Phoenix Authority, both of whom shall jointly manage the Series 2023
Program as provided in Section 4.6 of this Agreement and take such other action as provided in this Agreement,
and each of whom shall be initially, (a) in the case of the Phoenix Authority, Murray Boess, and (b) in the case of
the Maricopa Authority, Gregg Ghelfi.

“County” means Maricopa County, Arizona.

“Financing Team” means the attorneys, financial advisors, investment bankers, program administrators,
corporate trustees, rebate analysts, and other professionals, specialists and consultants necessary to design,
implement and administer the Series 2023 Program, as selected jointly by the Phoenix Authority and the
Maricopa Authority. The Financing Team does not include Authority Staff.

“General Indenture” means the General Indenture of Trust, to be dated as of the first day of the month
in which the initial series of the Series 2023 Program Bonds is issued, among the Authorities and the trustee
named therein.

“Indenture” means, together, the General Indenture and one or more series indentures pursuant to which
one or more series or subseries of the Series 2023 Program Bonds are issued and secured.

“Maricopa Authority” means The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Maricopa.

“Phoenix Authority” means The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona.

“Program Costs” means all fees, costs, and expenses incurred in connection with the development,
implementation and administration of the Series 2023 Program, including the fees and expenses of the Financing
Team, that shall be paid as provided in Section 3 of this Agreement.

“Program Summary” shall have the meaning assigned to it in Recital E of this Agreement.

“Residual Assets” means assets held under the Indenture, including cash, securities and outstanding
mortgage loans, after full defeasance of the Indenture and payment of all related fees, expenses and arbitrage rebate
liability, if any.

“Rule” shall have the meaning assigned to it in Section 4.5.1 of this Agreement.

“Series 2023 Program” means The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona
and The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Maricopa Series 2023 Single Family Mortgage
Revenue Bond Program.



1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 143
“Series 2023 Program Bonds” means single family mortgage revenue bonds issued jointly by the
Authorities in multiple series and subseries pursuant to a plan of finance, in an aggregate amount of not to exceed
$200 million, whose proceeds will be available to finance mortgage loans under the Series 2023 Program within
the County.

“State” means the State of Arizona.

“Termination Date” shall have the meaning assigned to it under Section 5.2.1 of this Agreement.

“Volume Cap” means any State of Arizona Private Activity Bond Volume Cap contributed by the
Phoenix Authority and/or the Maricopa Authority to a series or subseries of Series 2023 Program Bonds under
the Series 2023 Program.

2. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions under which
the Authorities will create, implement and administer the Series 2023 Program. It is the intent of each party that
this Agreement will constitute a cooperative and intergovernmental agreement pursuant to Sections 11-952,
35-706.G and 35-761 of the Arizona Revised Statutes.

3. Participation.

3.1 Scope of Participation. The Phoenix Authority and the Maricopa Authority will
participate in the Series 2023 Program as set forth in this Section 3.

3.2 Shared Control. The Phoenix Authority and the Maricopa Authority will have shared
control and responsibility for developing, implementing and managing the Series 2023 Program.

3.3 Program Development.

3.3.1 Program Summary. The Series 2023 Program shall initially be structured as
described in the Program Summary. Mutual consent of both the Phoenix Authority and the Maricopa Authority
is required for modifications, adjustments or additions to the Program Summary.

3.3.2 Reservations. The amount of the Series 2023 Program’s funds to be reserved
and the type of loans for which the Series 2023 Program’s funds will be reserved, if any, will be as specified in
the Program Summary. The targeted area reservation amount will comply with federal tax law.

3.3.3 Types of Loans. The type of mortgage loans to be offered by the Series 2023
Program will be as specified in the Program Summary.

3.4 Shared Revenues and Expenses.

3.4.1 Program Costs. Except as set forth in Section 3.5.2 below, the Authorities shall
share equally all fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the development, implementation and
administration of the Series 2023 Program, including the fees and expenses of the Financing Team, and such fees,
costs and expenses shall be paid first from the proceeds of or the revenues generated by the Series 2023 Program
and second from funds contributed by the Authorities to the extent necessary to pay these fees, costs and expenses;
provided that each Authority has the right, but not the obligation, to contribute such other monies or property as
it deems necessary or appropriate.

3.4.2 Administration Fees and Residual Assets. Each Authority will share the
Administration Fees and the Residual Assets equally.




1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 144
3.5 Program Participants.

3.5.1 Financing Team. The Authorities will have shared control and responsibility
for negotiating the compensation for the Financing Team for the Series 2023 Program. Each selected member
of the Financing Team will be required to sign a letter of engagement, addressed to each of the Phoenix Authority
and the Maricopa Authority, setting forth the scope of the duties to be performed and the basis for compensation
and reimbursement of such member, with copies submitted to each addressee.

3.5.2 Consultants. Each Authority, in its sole discretion, has the right to hire
consultants, advisors and attorneys in addition to the members of the jointly selected Financing Team and the
respective Authority Staff; provided that the fees, costs and other compensation of any additional consultants,
advisors and attorneys will be the sole responsibility of the applicable Authority, unless arrangements for cost
sharing have been otherwise agreed to by the other Authority in writing.

3.5.3 Duty of Loyalty. If requested by the Authorities, each member of the Financing
Team shall agree as a condition of their engagement in connection with the Series 2023 Program that: (i) the member
owes a duty of loyalty to each Authority and, in view of the duty, will not take or omit to take any action to the
prejudice of one Authority over another; and (ii) the member shall endeavor to keep each Authority and its respective
Authority Staff fully apprised about the status of the Series 2023 Program and promptly reply to requests for
information from each Authority and its respective Authority Staff.

3.6. Consent. No Authority can legally bind any other Authority without that Authority’s
express written consent.

4. Program Requirements.

4.1 Program Documents. The documents for the Series 2023 Program must contain
provisions as are reasonably necessary or appropriate to (i) assure that each Authority has timely access to such
information as is reasonably necessary to monitor the status of the Series 2023 Program and the balance and
disposition of Administration Fees or Residual Assets, (ii) protect each Authority’s respective interest in any
Administration Fees or Residual Assets, and (iii) assure that each Authority consents to fully comply and
cooperate with respect to compliance with federal tax laws and State laws applicable to the Series 2023 Program.

4.2 Refunding Opportunities.

4.2.1 To the extent permitted by law, the Authorities may agree on the manner that
refunding and recycling opportunities relating to the contributed Volume Cap utilized in the Series 2023 Program
for the Series 2023 Program Bonds will be allocated between them, regardless of how much Volume Cap, if any,
an Authority contributed to a particular series or subseries of the Series 2023 Program Bonds. In the absence of
any specific agreement between the Authorities for a particular series or subseries of Series 2023 Program Bonds,
the refunding and recycling opportunities with respect to the contributed Volume Cap shall be shared by the
Authorities equally.

4.2.2 To the extent permitted by law, the Series 2023 Program documents and any
other necessary directions to members of the Financing Team will contain the provisions necessary to effectuate
Section 4.2 of this Agreement.

4.3 Allocation of Mortgage Loan Funds. To the extent that the Authorities mutually
determine that the Series 2023 Program will not be operated on a first-come, first-served basis among lenders
participating in the Series 2023 Program, the Authorities will mutually determine an alternative method for
allocating (and, if applicable, re-allocating) mortgage loan funds among lenders participating in the Series 2023
Program.



1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 145
4.4. Consent.

4.4.1 Any action taken in connection with the Series 2023 Program will be with the
mutual consent of the Phoenix Authority and the Maricopa Authority, unless otherwise identified or described
in this Agreement, the Indenture or any of the other documents executed by both the Phoenix Authority and the
Maricopa Authority in connection with the Series 2023 Program.

4.4.2 Without limiting the generality of the foregoing Section 4.4.1, the following
list of items requires the mutual consent of the Phoenix Authority and the Maricopa Authority:

(a) optional redemption of each series or subseries of Series 2023 Program
Bonds;

(b) engagement of legal and financial professionals or other consultants,
except as engaged pursuant to Section 3.5.2;

(c) audits of funds and accounts held under the Indenture or other aspects
of the Series 2023 Program;

(d) directing legal or administrative proceedings in connection with the
enforcement of obligations under the Series 2023 Program of the trustee, servicer, lenders, underwriters, or any
other participant of the Series 2023 Program;

(e) extensions or other modifications of the origination period;

(f) approval of the Series 2023 Program’s marketing plan and any
material changes or modifications thereto; and

(g) form and content of all filings required by the Internal Revenue Code
and related regulations or by any other state or federal agency.

4.5 Continuing Disclosure Undertaking.

4.5.1 Each Authority acknowledges and agrees to provide disclosure information
for purposes of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 (the “Rule”).

4.5.2 Approval of each Authority is required of any documentation proposed to be
submitted in compliance with the Rule; provided that if any Authority is concerned about the form, substance,
accuracy or completeness of any submission, and the concern is not otherwise addressed, then the difficulty will
be resolved by a written opinion given by an independent law firm experienced in related disclosure matters.

4.6 Program Oversight; Communication Protocol.

4.6.1 The development, implementation and management of the Series 2023
Program shall be overseen by the Chief Executive Officer of the Phoenix Authority and the Executive Director
of the Maricopa Authority. Each of the Chief Executive Officer of the Phoenix Authority and the Executive
Director of the Maricopa Authority shall be responsible for obtaining in a timely manner such authorizations,
approvals and consents from the Board of Directors of the Phoenix Authority or the Maricopa Authority,
respectively, as may be necessary or appropriate to develop, implement and manage the Series 2023 Program.

4.6.2 Except for those matters that the Chief Executive Officer of the Phoenix
Authority or the Executive Director of the Maricopa Authority have expressly reserved for their judgment and
any matters that may have a material and adverse effect on the Series 2023 Program, the authority to develop,


1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 146
implement and manage the Series 2023 Program in accordance with the Program Summary, including, without
limitation, the daily management of the Financing Team, is hereby delegated to the Co-Team Leaders. The
Co-Team Leaders will have joint responsibility for making decisions concerning the development of the Series
2023 Program. In the event the Co-Team Leaders are not able to reach consensus with respect to a given issue,
the Co-Team Leaders shall take or omit to take such actions with respect to the issue as are necessary to further
the implementation of the Series 2023 Program until such a time as the Chief Executive Officer of the Phoenix
Authority and the Executive Director of the Maricopa Authority can be consulted for a final determination.

4.6.3 Commencing the date of this Agreement and continuing through the date of
issuance of all of the Series 2023 Program Bonds, the Co-Team Leaders will submit reports on the status of the
Series 2023 Program to the Board of Directors of the Phoenix Authority or the Maricopa Authority, as applicable,
at intervals established by Board of Directors of the Phoenix Authority or the Maricopa Authority, as necessary.
Status reports may be in writing and given orally, as directed by the applicable Board of Directors.

4.6.4 The implementation of the Series 2023 Program will be overseen by the
Authorities, including but not limited to decisions relating to the number of series or subseries of Series 2023
Program Bonds, the sizing and pricing of each series or subseries of Series 2023 Program Bonds, mortgage loan
rates and issuer fees.

4.6.5 All parties will cause routinely available information and reports on the Series
2023 Program and reports available on a commercially reasonable basis to be provided to all other parties as
may be reasonably requested from time to time. The costs for providing such reports shall be Program Costs.
Special reports may be made available at the sole cost of the requesting party. The determination as to whether
information and reports are routinely available, available on a commercially reasonable basis or special reports
shall be within the reasonable judgment of the Co-Team Leaders.

5. Term.

5.1 Effective Date. Unless this Agreement is terminated earlier as set forth in the provisions
of Section 5.2 below, this Agreement shall be effective upon the execution by all of the parties and shall remain
effective (a) with respect to matters relating to the issuance of Series 2023 Program Bonds and origination of the
mortgage loans funded thereby, in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 2025, and (b) with respect to all other matters
relating to the Series 2023 Program, as long any Series 2023 Program Bonds remain outstanding.

5.2 Termination.

5.2.1 Prior to the issuance of the first series of the Series 2023 Program Bonds, this
Agreement may be terminated by either the Phoenix Authority or the Maricopa Authority upon giving 15 days
written notice, the notice shall state the date of termination (the “Termination Date”).

5.2.2 In the event that all or any portion of the Series 2023 Program Bonds are not
issued under the Series 2023 Program as contemplated herein or this Agreement is terminated in accordance
with Section 5.2.1, all fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with the development of the Series 2023
Program, including any fees and expenses payable to members of the Financing Team, will be paid by the
Authorities equally or as otherwise may be agreed to by the Authorities.

5.2.3 In the event a notice of termination of this Agreement is given pursuant to
Section 5.2.1, the parties agree to comply with the following procedure:

(a) The Co-Team Leaders will prepare or cause to be prepared an
accounting of all fees, costs and expenses incurred by or on behalf of each Authority for the development of the
Series 2023 Program (the “Accounting”) that, together with supporting invoices, receipts and other records, shall
be submitted to the Board of Directors of each Authority no later than the Termination Date.


1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 147
(b) Within 15 days of the Termination Date, each Authority will tender
payment or reimbursement of all amounts the Authority is responsible for paying as set forth in the Accounting.

(c) Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, if either the
Co-Team Leaders or any Authority disagrees in good faith as to the amount, allocation or appropriateness of any fee,
cost or expense of developing the Series 2023 Program, the payment or reimbursement of the fee, cost or expense
will be segregated from the balance of the Accounting and will be addressed in accordance with the procedure
provided in Section 8.7.

6. Representations of the Phoenix Authority.

6.1 Authorization. The Phoenix Authority has full power and authority to enter into this
Agreement and the execution, delivery and consummation of this Agreement by the Phoenix Authority has been
duly authorized.

6.2 No Violation of Laws. Neither the execution, delivery nor performance of this
Agreement by the Phoenix Authority violates or will violate the Phoenix Authority’s articles or bylaws, the Act,
or any resolution of the Phoenix Authority.

7. Representations of the Maricopa Authority.

7.1 Authorization. The Maricopa Authority has full power and authority to enter into this
Agreement and the execution, delivery and consummation of this Agreement by the Maricopa Authority has
been duly authorized.

7.2 No Violation of Laws. Neither the execution, delivery nor performance of this
Agreement by the Maricopa Authority violates or will violate the Maricopa Authority’s articles or bylaws, the
Act, or any resolution of the Maricopa Authority.

8. General Provisions. Except to the extent inconsistent with the express language of the foregoing
provisions of this Agreement, the following provisions shall govern the interpretation, application, construction
and enforcement of this Agreement.

8.1 Notices. Any document, notice, consent or other communication (“Notice”) required
or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and either delivered in person, sent by facsimile
transmission or email, or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

Notices to the Phoenix Authority shall be sent to:

Juan Salgado
Chief Executive Officer
The Industrial Development Authority
of the City of Phoenix, Arizona
2201 East Camelback Road, Suite 405B
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
Email: jsalgado@phoenixida.com

with a copy to:




1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 148
Murray Boess
Chief Financial Officer
The Industrial Development Authority
of the City of Phoenix, Arizona
2201 East Camelback Road, Suite 405B
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
Email: mboess@phoenixida.com

and

Brigitte Finley Green, Esq.
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
2325 East Camelback Road, Suite 700
Phoenix, Arizona 85014
FAX: (602) 253-8129
Email: brigitte.finleygreen@squirepb.com

Notices to the Maricopa Authority shall be sent to:

Shelby Scharbach
Executive Director
The Industrial Development Authority
of the County of Maricopa
8687 East Via de Ventura, Suite 306
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Email: shelby@mcida.com

with a copy to:

Gregg Gehlfi
Business Development Officer
The Industrial Development Authority
of the County of Maricopa
8687 East Via de Ventura, Suite 306
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Email: gregg@mcida.com

and

The Industrial Development Authority
of the County of Maricopa
Attn: Administrator
8687 East Via de Ventura, Suite 306
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Email: janis@mcida.com and mary@mcida.com

and




1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 149
Brigitte Finley Green, Esq.
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
2325 East Camelback Road, Suite 700
Phoenix, Arizona 85014
FAX: (602) 253-8129
Email: brigitte.finleygreen@squirepb.com

A Notice shall be deemed received at the time it is personally served, on the day it is sent by
facsimile transmission or email, or, if mailed, five calendar days after the Notice is deposited in the United States
mail addressed as above provided. Any time period stated in a Notice shall be computed from the time the Notice
is deemed received. A party may change its address or the person to receive Notice by notifying the other parties
as provided in this paragraph. Notices sent by facsimile transmission or email shall also be sent by regular mail
to the recipient at the above address. This requirement for duplicate notice is not intended to change the effective
date of the Notice sent by facsimile transmission or email.

8.2 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable, the
provision shall be deemed severed from this Agreement, and the Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force
and effect.

8.3 Additional Acts and Documents. Each party agrees to do all things and take all actions,
and to make, execute and deliver other documents and instruments, as shall be reasonably requested to carry out
the provisions, intent and purpose of this Agreement.

8.4 Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned.

8.5 Conflict of Interest. All parties acknowledge that this Agreement is subject to
cancellation pursuant to the provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes Section 38-511, as amended. By this
reference, the provisions of said statute are incorporated herein to the extent of their applicability to
contracts of the nature of this Agreement under the laws of the State.

8.6 Third Party Beneficiaries. The parties do not intend for any other party to be a
beneficiary under this Agreement.

8.7 Dispute Resolution.

8.7.1 In the event that a dispute arises under this Agreement that cannot be settled
through negotiation, the dispute shall be resolved (a) first by the parties trying in good faith to settle the dispute
by non-binding mediation, the mediation session to be held in Phoenix, Arizona, and to be commenced within
14 days of the appointment of a mediator by the parties, or (b) if the dispute cannot be settled by mediation, then
by arbitration pursuant to the Arizona Uniform Arbitration Act (A.R.S. § 12-1501 et seq.) the arbitration to be
held in Phoenix, Arizona, before a single arbitrator selected by the parties, and judgment on the award rendered
by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. If the parties are unable to agree on a mediator
or an arbitrator, they agree to apply to the Superior Court for Maricopa County for the appointment of a mediator
or arbitrator. The prevailing party shall be entitled to payment or reimbursement of all of its reasonable fees and
expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses.

8.7.2 In the event of a dispute under this Agreement, an Authority is entitled to
recover only any fees, costs and expenses allocable to the Authority under Section 5.2.3 and any fees and
expenses payable under Section 8.7.1.

8.8 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, as such
counterparts shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument, and each counterpart is deemed an
original.


1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 150
8.9 Governing Law. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State.

9. Role of the City and the County.

9.1 Authorization and Consent. Each of the City and the County acknowledges that the
exercise of joint powers as set forth in this Agreement is in furtherance of the best interests of its respective
constituencies, and on this basis, each of the City and the County consents and agrees to the exercise of the joint
powers of each Authority, to the extent necessary, within its respective jurisdiction in accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth above.

9.2 Limit of Liability. Notwithstanding any provision here to the contrary, the parties
acknowledge and agree that neither the City nor the County shall have any pecuniary liability with respect to
(i) the development of the Series 2023 Program, (ii) the issuance and sale of the Series 2023 Program Bonds,
(iii) the administration of the Series 2023 Program, or (iv) any fees and expenses incurred by any of the parties
to this Agreement. This provision is a material inducement to each of the City and the County approving and
entering into this Agreement.



[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]




1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 151
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed as of the date and year first written above.

THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX,
ARIZONA, an Arizona nonprofit corporation


By:

Name: Juan Salgado

Its: Chief Executive Officer



APPROVED AS TO FORM IN ACCORDANCE
WITH A.R.S. § 11-952.D:



Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Counsel to The Industrial Development
Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona




[PHOENIX AUTHORITY SIGNATURE PAGE TO
COOPERATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT]




1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 152
THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF
MARICOPA, an Arizona nonprofit corporation


By:

Name: Shelby Scharbach

Its: Executive Director



APPROVED AS TO FORM IN ACCORDANCE
WITH A.R.S. § 11-952.D:



Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Counsel to The Industrial Development
Authority of the County of Maricopa




[MARICOPA AUTHORITY SIGNATURE PAGE TO
COOPERATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT]




1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 153
CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation

JEFF BARTON, City Manager


By:




ATTEST:



City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM IN ACCORDANCE
WITH A.R.S. § 11-952.D:



City Attorney




[CITY SIGNATURE PAGE TO
COOPERATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT]




1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 154
MARICOPA COUNTY


By:

Its:



ATTEST:




APPROVED AS TO FORM IN ACCORDANCE
WITH A.R.S. § 11-952.D:



Maricopa County Attorney




[COUNTY SIGNATURE PAGE TO
COOPERATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT]




1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 155
EXHIBIT A

PROGRAM SUMMARY




1097602350\1\AMERICAS

Page 156
The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona and
The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Maricopa
$200 Million Series 2023 Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program (the “Program”)
Program Summary
Dated September 27, 2023
The IDA Partnership
• The IDAs of the City of Phoenix and Maricopa County (the “IDAs”) have been joint issuers of tax-
exempt single family mortgage revenue bonds (“SFMRBs”) since 2000. To date, the IDAs have jointly
issued over $725 million in SFMRBs.
• The IDAs also jointly sponsor the non-bond, market priced Home in Five Advantage Program (the “HIFA
Program”).
Why Mortgage Revenue Bonds?
• Given current market conditions, “at market” mortgage loan rates and the HIFA Program’s mortgage
loan rates with assistance are significantly higher than in previous years, which makes it increasingly
difficult for homebuyers to qualify for a home purchase.
• Current market conditions for the issuance of SFMRBs under the Program (the “Program Bonds”) are
favorable: (i) a wide spread between tax-exempt and market (taxable) bond rates and (ii) an inverted
yield curve allowing bond proceeds to be invested at a rate of return close or equal to the bond yield
as Mortgage Loans are originated. Resulting loan rates are 1%-1.5% lower than market rate loan
options.

Preliminary cash flows for the initial series of Program Bonds (the “Series 2023A Bonds”) project a first
Mortgage Loan rate at or around 6.30%, with a 4% sized, deferred payment, forgivable, 0% interest
rate, Second Loan as down payment assistance, compared to a 7.28% “at market” loan rate with no
assistance (reported as of this date by Mortgage News Daily).

• The underlying first Mortgage Loans will be subject to IRS defined income limits and income
calculations (based on family size), purchase price limits and first-time homebuyer requirements,
which are currently:
Income Limit (by Family Size) Family of 2 or less Family of 3 or more Purchase Price Limit
Non-Targeted Borrowers $96,072 $112,200 $540,422
Targeted Borrowers $110,483 $130,900 $660,515

• The Program is viewed as a complement to, and not a substitute for, the HIFA Program, which offers
higher income limits and more flexible underwriting guidelines.
Program Participants
• Joint Issuers: The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix, Arizona and The
Industrial Development Authority of the County of Maricopa
• Issuers’ Counsel: Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
• Bond Counsel: Kutak Rock LLP
• Bond Trustee: U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association
• Municipal Advisor: CSG Advisors
• Bond Underwriter: Stifel Nicolaus

Page 1 1401 Lawrence Street, Suite 900, Denver CO 80202 | www.stifel.com/publicfinance
Page 157
• Bond Underwriter’s Counsel: Greenberg Traurig, LLP
• Servicer: Lakeview Loan Servicing
• Program Administrator/Compliance Agent: eHousingPlus

Proposal – General Indenture
• The IDAs are seeking authorization to issue up to $200 million of Program Bonds over the next 3 years
pursuant to a “master” General Indenture. The Program Bonds will be approximately $25-$75 million
per series to allow for the repricing of the first Mortgage Loan rates from time to time in order to remain
competitive relative to market rates.
• The IDAs will apply for private activity volume cap for the $25-$30 million Series 2023A Bonds, which
are expected to be issued in November 2023. The additional $170-$175 million in volume cap will
be applied for at a later date and is subject to availability.

Bond and Mortgage Loan Structure
• The General Indenture allows for a significant amount of flexibility with respect to how the Program
Bonds are structured, including but not limited to the issuance of fixed rate serial bonds, par term
bonds and premium call-protected ‘planned amortization class’ (“PAC”) term bonds.
• The Program Bonds will qualify for an expected rating of no less than “Aa2” from Moody’s.
• The Program Bonds are limited obligations of the IDAs, secured solely by the pledged assets and
revenues. There is no recourse or liability to the IDAs.
• The General Indenture also allows for flexibility with respect to the first Mortgage Loans and the form
and terms of down payment assistance Second Loans offered.
Series 2023A Bonds will include only FHA insured and VA guaranteed first Mortgage Loans but future
Program Bonds are likely to allow RD guaranteed, Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac eligible first
Mortgage Loans.

Series 2023A Bonds will provide a Second Loan (4% of the first Mortgage Loan amount), with a
stated interest rate of 0%, for which principal is deferred, due in full upon sale or refinance but
forgiven in full on the 7-year anniversary date.

• Once the Program Bonds are issued, proceeds will be invested in qualified investments or a qualified
investment vehicle and used to purchase, over a 6-12 month period, mortgage backed securities
(“MBS”), guaranteed as to timely payment by GNMA, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

IDA Financial Contribution
• Once the Program Bonds are issued, the available sources of funds are applied against the total
uses of funds. In the event of a shortfall, an issuer contribution will be required. The IDAs are
initially committing up to $7 million each from their own resources for the entire $200 million
Program (the “IDA Contribution”). Expected sources and uses of funds for the Series 2023A Bonds
are as follows:




Page 2 1401 Lawrence Street, Suite 900, Denver CO 80202 | www.stifel.com/publicfinance
Page 158
Sources of Funds Uses of Funds
Bonds Issued $30,000,000 Acquisition of GNMA MBS [1] $30,000,000
PAC Bond Premium 1,114,400 Down Payment Assistance (4%) [1] 1,200,000
Servicer Contribution (1%) 300,000 Lender Compensation (1.5%) [1] 450,000
IDA Contribution 1,755,600 Capitalized Interest [2] 950,000
Cash Flow Lag (0.60%) [3] 180,000
Bond Issuance Costs 390,000
Total Sources of Funds $33,170,000 Total Uses of Funds $33,170,000
[1] MBS are purchased by the Bond Trustee at a 104.5 price.
[2] This assumes a 0% Series 2023A Bond proceeds reinvestment rate.
[3] This covers the accrued interest on the MBS purchased


• Currently, there are no investment vehicles for bond proceeds offering a guaranteed fixed rate return
that satisfies rating agency requirements. Therefore, for Series 2023A Bonds cash flow purposes the
rating agencies will require the assumption of a 0% reinvestment rate.
• Series 2023A Bond proceeds can still be invested in attractive qualified money market funds. Current
money market returns are in the 5% range.

For Series 2023A Bonds, of the $1.8 million projected as the IDA Contribution, as much as $750,000
could be recouped from investment earnings during the MBS acquisition period. The remaining
“unreimbursed” portion of the IDA Contribution may be recouped over time from ongoing fees paid to the
IDAs while the Program Bonds are outstanding, as well as surplus funds after the Program Bonds are
redeemed in full.


“Unreimbursed” Portion of the IDA Contribution/Net Economic Benefit
• For each series of Program Bonds, the Municipal Advisor will provide the IDAs with the following:
o the IDA Contribution required;
o a projection on the reimbursement of the IDA Contribution the IDAs may expect from
reinvestment earnings subject to release after the loan origination period; and
o a projection on the ongoing issuer fee from cash flow and the surplus after that series of
Program Bonds are redeemed in full (in present value terms) in relation to the
“unreimbursed” amount of the IDA Contribution (the “Net Economic Benefit”).

For Series 2023A Bonds, cash flow projections indicate that the sum of the cash flows generated from the
ongoing issuer fee and the surplus after the Series 2023A Bonds are redeemed in full, less the
unreimbursed portion of the IDA Contribution, are summarized as follows:




Page 3 1401 Lawrence Street, Suite 900, Denver CO 80202 | www.stifel.com/publicfinance
Page 159
Loan Prepayment Speed
Revenue Source to the IDAs 100% PSA 150% PSA 200% PSA 300% PSA 400% PSA
Ongoing IDA Fee (.20%) $491,693 $413,456 $355,730 $277,977 $229,014
Surplus after Bonds Redeemed 1,634,206 1,431,805 1,388,849 1,219,163 1,018,845
Less: IDA Unreimbursed Contribution (1,005,600) (1,005,600) (1,005,600) (1,005,600) (1,005,600)
Net PV Economic Benefit $1,120,299 $839,661 $688,979 $491,540 $242,259
As a % of the Bonds Issued 3.7% 2.8% 2.3% 1.6% 0.8%


Net Economic Benefit to the IDAs
• See attached Exhibit for Municipal Advisor projections on the “reimbursed” and “unreimbursed” IDA
Contribution for the $200,000,000 of Program Bonds issued.



Home in Five Platinum Program
- The Loan Origination Process -



Lender Network
• The IDAs will solicit existing HIFA Program originating lenders to gauge their interest in signing a
Master Mortgage Purchase Agreement and offering the “Home in Five Platinum Program” to eligible
borrowers.
• Participating lenders (“Lenders”) must also be approved as correspondent lenders with Lakeview
Loan Servicing (the “Servicer”), which will purchase all first Mortgage Loans and receive the Second
Loans (which are originated in the names of the IDAs) from the Lenders for servicing for the IDAs.
• Lenders must abide by the IDAs’ Program guidelines and the Servicer’s Lender Guide.
Bond Series Release Date and Loan Applications
Once a series of Program Bonds are priced:
• Lenders will be notified of all key series information, including but not limited to the availability of
funds, the applicable income limits and purchase price limits, the first Mortgage Loan rate, the size
and terms of the Second Loan and the timeframe (dates) during which loans may be submitted to the
Servicer for purchase.
• Lenders may begin accepting borrower applications per Program eligibility guidelines.
• Lenders will rate lock (60 day commitments) through the eHousingPlus on-line lender portal.
• Within 45 days of the rate lock, the first Mortgage Loans must have been underwritten by the Lender.
• Within 60 days of rate lock, the first Mortgage Loans will close and fund. The Lender will advance the
Second Loan assistance for the benefit of the Borrower(s) on behalf of the IDAs.




Page 4 1401 Lawrence Street, Suite 900, Denver CO 80202 | www.stifel.com/publicfinance
Page 160
Pre-Purchase Compliance Review by eHousingPlus
• After the loan closing, Lenders will submit a file of loan documents to eHousingPlus for review to
ensure that the Mortgage Loan meets the federal/state rules, specifically:
o The household income does not exceed the applicable income limit
o The First Time Homebuyer requirement is met (unless exempt)
o All required affidavits and certifications are accurate and signed
o Arizona set-aside rules for low income and manufactured housing are met, and federal rules
for targeted area requirements are met
Lender Compensation (2.5% total)
• Lenders are permitted to charge the Borrower an Origination Fee of up to 1%. Additionally, Lenders
may charge “customary and reasonable” per loan fees (appraisal, title, credit reports, etc.).
• The Servicer will pay Lenders 1.5% as first Mortgage Loans are purchased.
Loan Aggregation and Pooling into Securities/Delivery to the Bond Trustee
• First Mortgage Loans will be pooled into MBS and delivered to the Bond Trustee, delivery versus
payment, at a stated approximate 104.5% purchase price.
• Lenders will provide the Servicer with representations and warranties that the first Mortgage Loan is
eligible for such pooling.




Page 5 1401 Lawrence Street, Suite 900, Denver CO 80202 | www.stifel.com/publicfinance
Page 161
EXHIBIT

2023A 2024A 2024B 2024C Calendar Years
Issue #1 Issue #2 Issue #3 Issue #4 2025-26 TOTAL

Bond Par Amount $ 30,000,000 $ 50,000,000 $ 50,000,000 $ 70,000,000 TBD $ 200,000,000

Sources of Funds
Bond Premium Raised* 3.71% 1,114,400 1,857,000 1,857,000 2,600,000 7,428,400

Uses of Funds
DPA Needed 4.0% 1,200,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,800,000 8,000,000
Neg Arb Reserve* 3.2% 950,000 1,583,000 1,583,000 2,217,000 6,333,000
Cash Flow Lag* 0.6% 180,000 300,000 300,000 420,000 1,200,000
Add'l SRP Deposit** 0.5% 150,000 250,000 250,000 350,000 1,000,000
Costs of Issuance* 1.3% 390,000 650,000 650,000 910,000 2,600,000
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS $ 2,870,000 $ 4,783,000 $ 4,783,000 $ 6,697,000 $ 19,133,000

IDA Contribution (Gross) $ 1,755,600 $ 2,926,000 $ 2,926,000 $ 4,097,000 $ 11,704,600
Less Reimbursement of Neg Arb Funds (950,000) (1,583,000) (3,800,000) (6,333,000)
IDA Contribution (Net) $ 1,755,600 $ 2,926,000 $ 1,976,000 $ 2,514,000 $ (3,800,000) $ 5,371,600
from 2024B
and 2024C
* Estimates
** Represents the difference in the additional lender comp (1.5%) and the estimated SRP received from the Servicer (1.00%).




Page 6 1401 Lawrence Street, Suite 900, Denver CO 80202 | www.stifel.com/publicfinance
Page 162
ATTACHMENT D

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICAL COPY OF THE
FINAL ADOPTED RESOLUTION

RESOLUTION NO. ______


A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY
THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF
THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA, OF SINGLE
FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, IN ONE
OR MORE SERIES PURSUANT TO A PLAN OF
FINANCE, IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000,000, TO
FINANCE THE SERIES 2023 SINGLE FAMILY
MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM OF THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA AND THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, AND APPROVING A
COOPERATIVE/ INTERGOVERNMENTAL
AGREEMENT, THE STANDARDS AND
REQUIREMENTS AND THE GENERAL PLAN
RELATING TO THE PROGRAM AND THE BONDS;
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS
DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY
DOCUMENTS

___________________


WHEREAS, The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix,

Arizona (the “Phoenix Authority”), is a nonprofit corporation designated a political

subdivision of the State of Arizona (the “State”) incorporated with the approval of

the City of Phoenix, Arizona (the “City”); and


WHEREAS, The Industrial Development Authority of the County of

Maricopa (the “Maricopa Authority” and, together with the Phoenix Authority, the

“Authorities”) is a nonprofit corporation designated a political subdivision of the


4887-0962-3165.5

Page 163
State incorporated with the approval of Maricopa County, Arizona (“Maricopa

County”); and


WHEREAS, Title 35, Chapter 5, of the Arizona Revised Statutes, Sections

35-701 et seq., as amended (the “Act”), authorizes the Authorities and each of

them to issue revenue bonds to finance directly or indirectly the acquisition,

construction, improvement or equipping of projects which are owner-occupied

single-family dwelling units to be occupied by persons of low and moderate

income; and


WHEREAS, the Authorities, the City and Maricopa County will enter into an

agreement (the “Cooperative/Intergovernmental Agreement”) providing for the

Authorities’ cooperation in jointly issuing bonds in an aggregate principal amount

not to exceed $200,000,000 (the “Series 2023 Program Bonds”) to finance their

Series 2023 Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program (the “Series 2023

Program”) to finance directly or indirectly the acquisition, construction,

improvement or equipping of projects which are owner-occupied single-family

dwelling units to be occupied by persons of low and moderate income throughout

the area within Maricopa County (the “Project”) and providing that the combined

jurisdictions of the Phoenix Authority and the Maricopa Authority will be the

jurisdiction of both of the Authorities for purposes of the Series 2023 Program; and


WHEREAS, Section 35-706(D) of the Act provides that the Standards and

Requirements adopted by the Authorities for the Series 2023 Program and the

Series 2023 Program Bonds requires the approval of the Council of the City; and


2 Resolution No. ____
4887-0962-3165.5

Page 164
WHEREAS, Section 35-726(A) of the Act provides that the General Plan

adopted by the Authorities for the Series 2023 Program and the Series 2023

Program Bonds requires the approval of the Council of the City; and


WHEREAS, the Phoenix Authority, by Resolution No. 2023-14, duly

adopted by the Board of Directors of the Phoenix Authority at a lawful meeting

called and held on September 21, 2023, granted approval to the issuance and sale

by the Phoenix Authority, jointly with the Maricopa Authority, of one or more series

of the Series 2023 Program Bonds pursuant to a plan of finance in an aggregate

principal amount not to exceed $200,000,000; and


WHEREAS, 35-721(B) of the Act provides that the proceedings of the

Phoenix Authority under which the Series 2023 Program Bonds are to be issued

require the approval of the Council of the City for the issuance of the Series 2023

Program Bonds; and


WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as

amended (the “Code”) requires that an “applicable elected representative” (as that

term is defined in the Code) approve the issuance of the Series 2023 Program

Bonds and the plan of finance for the Project following a public hearing, which

public hearing was jointly held by the Phoenix Authority and the Maricopa Authority

on October 10, 2023; and


WHEREAS, information regarding the Series 2023 Program and the Series

2023 Program Bonds has been presented to the Council of the City; and



3 Resolution No. ____
4887-0962-3165.5

Page 165
WHEREAS, it is intended that this Resolution shall constitute approval by

the Council of the City pursuant to Sections 35-706(D), 35-726(A) and 35-721(B)

of the Act and of the “applicable elected representative” as defined in Section

147(f) of the Code with respect to the Series 2023 Project Bonds.


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA as follows:


SECTION 1. The Cooperative/Intergovernmental Agreement relating to the

Series 2023 Program is hereby approved. The City Manager, or his designee, is

hereby authorized to execute the Cooperative/Intergovernmental Agreement. The

Cooperative/Intergovernmental Agreement is to be in substantially the form now

before the Council at this meeting and hereby approved, or with such changes

therein as shall be approved by the City Manager, or his designee, the officers of

the Authorities executing the same and by all other necessary parties, their

execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of their approval of any and all

changes or revisions therein from the form of the Cooperative/Intergovernmental

Agreement now before this Council.


SECTION 2. The Standards and Requirements adopted by the Authorities

for the Series 2023 Program and the Series 2023 Program Bonds are hereby

approved. The Standards and Requirements are to be in substantially the form

now before the Council at this meeting and hereby approved, or with such changes

therein as shall be approved by the officers of the Authorities executing the same

and by all other necessary parties, their execution thereof to constitute conclusive


4 Resolution No. ____
4887-0962-3165.5

Page 166
evidence of their approval of any and all changes or revisions therein from the form

of the Standards and Requirements now before this Council.


SECTION 3. The General Plan adopted by the Authorities for the Series

2023 Program and the Series 2023 Program Bonds is hereby approved. The

General Plan is to be in substantially the form now before the Council at this

meeting and hereby approved, or with such changes therein as shall be approved

by the officers of the Authorities executing the same and by all other necessary

parties, their execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of their approval

of any and all changes or revisions therein from the form of the General Plan now

before this Council.


SECTION 4. The proceedings of the Phoenix Authority under which the

Series 2023 Program Bonds are to be issued are hereby approved.


SECTION 5. The issuance of the Series 2023 Program Bonds and the plan

of finance for the Project are hereby approved for purposes of Section 147(f) of the

Code.


SECTION 6. The City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to

execute all necessary documents.


SECTION 7. Notice of Arizona Revised Statutes Section 38-511 is hereby

given. The provisions of that statute are by this reference incorporated herein to

the extent of their applicability to matters contained herein under the laws of the

State.


5 Resolution No. ____
4887-0962-3165.5

Page 167
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA this

18th day of October, 2023.



Mayor

ATTEST:


City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:


Acting City Attorney


REVIEWED BY:


City Manager




6 Resolution No. ____
4887-0962-3165.5

Page 168



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Elevator and Escalator Maintenance IFB PCC 22-006 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-50243)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
TK Elevator Corporation to provide complete elevator and escalator maintenance and
repair services for the Phoenix Convention Center Department. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of
the contract will not exceed $5 million.

Summary
This contract will provide preventative and predictive maintenance, repair services,
and inspections, as required, for 42 traction and hydraulic elevators, 28 escalators,
and five stage/wheelchair lifts located throughout Phoenix Convention Center
Department facilities.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Three vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendor:

Selected Bidder:
TK Elevator Corporation: $47,368.78 - Monthly

Additional Bidders:
Otis Elevator Company $48,230 - Monthly
Kone Inc. $64,892 - Monthly

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Dec. 1, 2023, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.




Page 169

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $5 million.

Funding is available in the Phoenix Convention Center Department's operating budget.

Location
General Location: Phoenix Convention Center and Venues
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.




Page 170



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Event Security Services Contract - Request for Award (Ordinance S-50244)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Pride Group, LLC. to provide event security services for the Phoenix Convention
Center and Venues. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the
City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. The gross sales for the
contract are estimated to produce $9,701,629 over the five-year term, resulting in
approximately $776,130 in revenue to the City.

Summary
This contract will provide event security services to the Phoenix Convention Center
Department (PCCD) clients. Services include exclusive event security services for
shows open to the general public and non-exclusive event security for events not open
to the general public. On a limited basis, event security services are provided for
PCCD or other City departments for various City-sponsored events.

Procurement Information
A Revenue Contract Solicitation procurement was processed in accordance with City
of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Five vendors submitted responses and were evaluated after deemed to be responsive
and responsible.

The evaluation panel recommendations were reached by consensus in consideration
of published selection criteria with total points ranging from 0 - 1,000:

Method of Approach (0-300 points)
Company Resources (0-300 points)
Qualifications and Experience (0-200 points)
Financial Return to the City (0-200 points)

The following Proposer is selected for award:

Selected Vendor
Pride Group, LLC. - 964.20


Page 171


Additional Proposers:
Contemporary Services Corporation - 849
Best Crowd Management - 601.40
Providers International - 435
Professional Protection Services International - 319.60

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Jan. 1, 2024, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The Contractor will pay eight percent commission over the five-year term, resulting in
approximately $776,130 in revenue to the City.

Location
General Location Phoenix Convention Center and Venues
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.




Page 172



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fire Department Mutual Aid Agreement for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating
Station (Ordinance S-50272)

Request City Council authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into
an agreement with Arizona Public Service Company (APS) as operating agent for Palo
Verde Nuclear Generating Station. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer
to accept all funds related to this item.

Summary
The purpose of this agreement is for the Phoenix Fire Department to provide back-up
fire suppression services at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS), and for
PVNGS to provide technical expertise to Fire staff in the event of a radiological or
related emergency, or in planning for these types of emergencies. In addition, PVNGS
and Fire staff will participate in joint drills and exercises, training programs, pre-
incident planning, post-incident critique, and other activities to enhance safe and
effective emergency operations when practical and feasible to participate.

Contract Term
The agreement shall commence on Jan. 1, 2024, and shall remain in effect through
Dec. 31, 2028.

Financial Impact
PVNGS will reimburse the City of Phoenix for all services per the terms of the
agreement.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.




Page 173



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Arizona Criminal Justice Commission Project Safe Neighborhoods Grant
(Ordinance S-50236)

Request retroactive authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to allow the
Police Department to apply for, accept, and enter into an agreement with the Arizona
Criminal Justice Commission (ACJC) for the Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) grant.
Funding provided under this grant will not exceed $13,500. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all
funds related to this item.

Summary
The PSN grant is a nationwide initiative that brings together federal, state, local, tribal
and territorial law enforcement officials, prosecutors, community-based partners and
other stakeholders to identify the most pressing violent crime problems in a community
and develop comprehensive solutions to address them.

The U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, has awarded each
State funding to implement a PSN Project within their jurisdiction. The Police
Department is applying for funding in the amount of $13,500 for communications and
surveillance equipment that will assist Violent Crimes detectives in investigating and
solving crimes. City Council request was paused while the ACJC reviewed and
approved the proposed use of grant funds.

Contract Term
The contract began on April 11, 2023 and will terminate on Dec. 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
The amount of funding available is $13,500. No matching funds are required.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.




Page 174



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Intergovernmental Agreement for Facility Access and Usage of Phoenix Police
Department Emergency Operations Center (Ordinance S-50268)

Request retroactive authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to authorize
the Police Department to enter into an agreement with the Maricopa County Sheriff's
Office to use the City's driving track to train their cadets and officers on proper driving
techniques.

Summary
The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO) does not have a location to provide
proper driving techniques to their cadets and officers and have utilized the Phoenix
Police Department's Emergency Vehicle Operation Center to train their cadets and
officers for several years.

The use of the driving track does not interfere with any training involving Phoenix
Police personnel and does not use any Phoenix Police vehicles. MCSO provides their
own vehicles when training their cadets and/or officers as well as provides additional
driving instructors to assist Phoenix Police training, specifically driving instructor school
training.

Contract Term
The Intergovernmental Agreement will be effective for one year beginning Aug. 9,
2023, terminating on Aug. 8, 2024.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.

Location
Emergency Vehicle Operation Center
8645 W. Broadway Rd. Tolleson, Ariz. 85353
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.



Page 175



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Airport Security Guard Services Contracts AVN RFP 23-033 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-50247)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Covenant Aviation Security, LLC and Universal Protection Security Systems, LP dba
Allied Universal Security Services to provide airport security guard services for the
Aviation Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of the contracts will be up to $45 million.

Summary
These contracts will provide licensed, unarmed uniformed security guards, equipment,
supplies and supervision as necessary to provide high quality security services on an
as-needed basis for Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX), Phoenix Deer
Valley Airport (DVT), and Goodyear Airport (GYR) and their owned and maintained
facilities. PHX is regulated under the Code of Federal Regulations Title 49, Parts 1500
through 1580. As a regulated entity, the Transportation Security Administration requires
airports to maintain a federally-approved Airport Security Plan. The scope of security
services in these contracts are necessary to ensure compliance with the approved
plan.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Four vendors submitted proposals and three proposals were deemed responsive and
responsible for both Group 1 (Regulatory - External) and Group 2 (Regulatory -
Internal) contracting opportunities. An evaluation committee of City staff and airport
stakeholders evaluated the proposals based on the following criteria with a maximum
possible point total of 1,000:

Business and Operations Plan and Method of Approach to Scope of Work (0-350
points)
Company Qualifications and Experience (0-275 points)
General Manager Qualifications and Experience (0-225 points)
Fee Schedule (0-150 points)


Page 176


After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendors:

Group 1 - Airport Security Guard Services (Regulatory - External)
Covenant Aviation Security, LLC - 947.5 points

Group 2 - Airport Security Guard Services (Regulatory - Internal)
Universal Protection Security Systems, LP dba Allied Universal Security Services -
947.75 points

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about Jan. 1, 2024, for a two-year term with three one-
year options to extend at the sole discretion of the Director of Aviation Services.

Financial Impact
The total contract value will not exceed $45 million for the five-year term.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department Operating Budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board (PAAB):
• Recommended approval of this item on Sept. 21, 2023, by a vote of 6-0.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Goodyear Airport, 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, Ariz.
Council Districts: 1, 8, and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 177



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Escalator Cleaning Services IFB 20-002 - Amendment (Ordinance S-50250)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 155470 with West Coast Escalator Cleaning, Inc. to add the Aviation
Department for deep cleaning of the escalators and moving walkways at Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will be up to $377,500.

Summary
This contract will provide all equipment, labor, and supplies required to deep clean the
escalators and moving walkways located at the Phoenix Convention Center and
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport on an as needed basis. Cleaning service will
include removing excess grease on the escalators and moving walkways to prevent
slipping hazards for the traveling public.

Contract Term
The Contract term remains unchanged, ending on Nov. 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $377,500 in additional funds, the revised total value of the Contract
will be up to $755,000. Funds are available in the Aviation and Phoenix Convention
Center departments' budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Escalator Cleaning Service Contract No. 155470 (Ordinance S-48026) on Oct. 27,
Location
Phoenix Convention Center, 100 N. 3rd St.
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E Buckeye Road
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers John Chan and Mario Paniagua,
and the Phoenix Convention Center and Aviation departments.


Page 178



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Terminal 4 South 1 Concourse Retail Concessions Phase II at Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport - Request for Award (Ordinance S-50253)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a lease agreement
with Paradies Lagardere @ PHX 2022 LLC dba Paradies Lagardere (Paradies) for the
development, operation, and management of retail concessions in the new Terminal 4
South 1 (T4S1) Concourse at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) with a
term of 10 years with no options to extend. Further request to authorize the City
Manager, or his designee, to execute a lease of up to 1,500 square feet as additional
support space in Terminal 4 for Paradies's operational needs. Further request to
authorize the City Treasurer accept all funds related to this item.

Summary
On March 17, 2021, the Phoenix City Council authorized the Aviation Department to
issue a revenue contract solicitation (RCS) for retail concessions in new T4S1
Concourse. The RCS was divided into two contract award phases. Phase One of the
RCS was issued on May 27, 2021, and contract awards were approved on Dec. 2,
2021, for two retail concession operations to Marshall Retail Group LLC dba Uptown
Phoenix and InMotion. This action is for award of Phase Two.

The goals of the RCS were to optimize sales and revenue over the term of the lease,
provide quality and unique retail merchandise to passengers, emphasize local culture
in the design of the facility, and select respondents with experience operating
successful retail concessions in the U.S. and abroad.

Procurement Information
The Aviation Department issued Phase Two of the RCS on Sept. 21, 2022, and
responses were due on Dec. 9, 2022. Two responses were received and deemed
responsive and responsible. The evaluation panel met for the initial consensus
meeting on Feb. 21, 2023, and respondent interviews were held on March 9, 2023.
The panel's award recommendation was published on the City's public award website
on April 11, 2023. The RCS was processed in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10.




Page 179

An evaluation panel evaluated the responses based on the following published criteria
in the RCS with total points ranging from 0 to 1,000:
· Proposed concepts and merchandise plans for each concessions space 0-250
points
· Design and quality of tenant improvements 0-200 points
· Management, marketing, operations, and technology plans 0-200 points
· Experience and qualifications of the Respondent 0-150 points
· Proposed business plan 0-100 points
· Financial return to the City 0-100 points

The consensus score and ranking for each respondent by the evaluation panel is
shown below in consideration of the above criteria:

Respondent Points
Paradies Lagardere @ PHX 2022 LLC dba Paradies Lagardere 925
HG PHX Concessions JV dba Hudson 835

The evaluation panel selected for award: Paradies Lagardere @ PHX 2022 LLC dba
Paradies Lagardere

Public Outreach
The RCS process included all standard and required outreach efforts, including
advertising in aviation industry publications.

Contract Term
The term of the lease will be 10 years with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The estimated annual revenue to the City will be the established minimum annual
guarantee (MAG) or percentage of gross sales, whichever is greater. MAG for the first
year will be $400,000. The MAG will be adjusted annually thereafter at 85 percent of
the prior year's annual rent or 100 percent of MAG for the first Lease year, whichever
is greater.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Business and Development Subcommittee recommended
approval of this item on Aug. 3, 2023, by a vote of 2-0 and the Phoenix Aviation
Advisory Board recommended approval of the item on Aug. 17, 2023, by a vote of 7-0.
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended approval
of this item on Sept. 20, 2023, by a vote of 3-0.


Page 180


Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 181



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Terminal 4 South 1 Concourse Food and Beverage Concessions Phase II at
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - Request for Award (Ordinance S-
50255)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a lease agreement
with PHX S1 Restaurant Partners, LLC. for the development, operation, and
management of food and beverage concessions in the new Terminal 4 South 1 (T4 S1)
Concourse at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport for 10 years with no options to
extend. Further request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to lease up to
1,500 square feet as additional support space in T4 for PHX S1 Restaurant Partners,
LLC's operational needs. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer accept all
funds related to this item.

Summary
On March 17, 2021, Phoenix City Council authorized the Aviation Department to issue
a revenue contract solicitation (RCS) for food and beverage concessions in the new T4
S1 Concourse. The RCS was divided into two contract award phases. Phase One of
the RCS was issued on May 27, 2021, and contract awards were approved on March
2, 2022, for two food and beverage concession operations to The Grove, Inc. and
Emerging Domestic Market Ventures, LLC. This action is for award of Phase Two.

The goals of the RCS were to optimize sales and revenue over the term of the lease,
provide quality food and beverage offerings to passengers, emphasize local culture in
the design of the facility, and select respondents with experience operating successful
food and beverage concessions in the United States and aboard.

Procurement Information
The Aviation Department issued Phase Two of the RCS on Sept. 21, 2022, and
responses were due on Dec. 9, 2022. Three responses were received, and all
responses were deemed responsive and responsible. The evaluation panel met for the
initial consensus meeting on Feb. 14, 2023, and respondent interviews were held on
March 20, 2023. The panel's award recommendation was posted on the City's public
award website on April 11, 2023. The RCS was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10.



Page 182

An evaluation panel evaluated the responses based on the following published criteria
in the RCS with total points ranging from 0 to 1,000:
Proposed concepts and menu plans for each concessions space 0-250 points
Design and quality of tenant improvements 0-225 points
Management, marketing, operations, and technology plans 0-175 points
Experience and qualifications of the respondent 0-150 points
Proposed business plan 0-100 points
Financial return to the City 0-100 points

The consensus score and ranking for each respondent by the evaluation panel is
shown below in consideration of the above criteria:

Respondents Points
PHX S1 Restaurant Partners, LLC. 980
SSP America, Inc. 935
High Flying Foods PHX, LLC. 900

The evaluation panel selected for award: PHX S1 Restaurant Partners, LLC.

Public Outreach
The RCS solicitation process included all standard and required outreach efforts,
including advertising in aviation industry publications.

Contract Term
The term of the Lease will be 10 years with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The estimated annual revenue to the City will be the established minimum annual
guarantee (MAG) or percentage of gross sales, whichever is greater. MAG for the first
year will be $344,625. The MAG will be adjusted annually thereafter at 85 percent of
the prior year's annual rent or 100 percent of MAG for the first lease year, whichever is
greater.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Business and Development Subcommittee recommended
approval of this item on Aug. 3, 2023, by a vote of 2-0 and the Phoenix Aviation
Advisory Board recommended approval of the item on Aug. 17, 2023, by a vote of 7-0.
The City Council Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee
recommended approval of this item on Sept. 20, 2023, by a vote of 3-0.




Page 183

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 184



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Hangar Lease Amendments with State of Arizona Department of Public Safety at
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Ordinance S-50265)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Corporate Hangar
Lease 142410 and Executive Hangar Lease 152019 with the State of Arizona
Department of Public Safety at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to extend the
Term until Jan. 31, 2026, with two one-year options.

Summary
State of Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) entered into Corporate Hangar
Lease 142410 in April 2016 and Executive Hangar Lease 152019 in March 2020.
Lease 142410 is scheduled to terminate in October 2024 and Lease 152019 is
scheduled to terminate in February 2024. DPS is requesting that the Leases be
extended until Jan. 31, 2026, with two one-year options. The hangars are used for the
storage and allowed maintenance of DPS’s approved aircraft and for no other use or
purpose without the consent of the Director of Aviation Services.

Contract Term
The amended lease term will be extended until Jan. 31, 2026, with two one-year
options to extend that may be exercised at the sole discretion of the Director of
Aviation Services.

Financial Impact
Current rent for Lease 142410 is approximately $143,965 per year ($11,997 monthly)
and Lease 152019 is approximately $17,663 per year ($1,472 monthly). Combined
annual rent is approximately $161,628 ($13,469 monthly). Rent will be adjusted per
the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Consumer Price Index or three percent, whichever is
greater, each year of the extension. The total anticipated revenue over the extension, if
all options are exercised, will be approximately $537,067.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Lease 142410 (Ordinance S-40238) on Oct. 2, 2013;
· Lease 142410 - Amendment (Ordinance S-46941) on Sept. 16, 2020; and



Page 185

· Lease 152019 (Ordinance S-46215) on Dec. 2, 2019.

The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval of this item on Sept. 21,
2023, by a vote of 6-0.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 2615 & 2629 E. Air Lane
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 186



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Passenger Boarding Bridges Maintenance and Repair Services Contract AVN
RFP 23-035 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-50267)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Oxford Electronics, Inc dba Oxford Airport Technical Services to provide passenger
boarding bridge maintenance and repair services for the Aviation Department. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
total value of the contract will be up to $6,475,000.

Summary
This contract will provide passenger boarding bridge (PBB) repair and maintenance
services at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. The contractor will manage and
service the PBB system and is required to have the PBB system fully operational 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. The contractor will provide preventative
maintenance as specified in the Original Equipment Manufacturer maintenance
manuals for all PBB equipment to ensure protection of all passengers, peak
performance, and minimal downtime.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10 a Request for Proposal was issued
and one proposal was received and deemed responsive and responsible.

An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated the offer based on the following criteria
with a maximum possible point total of 1000:

Operations Plan (0-300 points)
Qualifications and Experience (0-275 points)
Quality Assurance Program (0-250 points)
Pricing (0-175 points)

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:

Oxford Electronics, Inc dba Oxford Airport Technical Services, 725 points.



Page 187

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Dec. 1, 2023, for a three-year term with two one-
year options to extend for a five-year contract.

Financial Impact
The total contract value will be up to $6,475,000 for the five-year contract term.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Operating budget.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 188



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Dial-a-Ride Trip Scheduling and Dispatch Software Contract Amendment
(Ordinance S-50260)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 148851 with Trapeze Software Group, Inc. to extend maintenance and
support and provide professional services and training. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total cost of the
amendment, including optional extensions and taxes, will not exceed $1,108,545
through 2028.

Summary
The City of Phoenix provides paratransit (Dial-a-Ride) services for disabled residents.
The Public Transit Department utilizes Trapeze software for scheduling and dispatch,
rider notification services, and a passenger web portal for booking and managing Dial-
a-Ride accounts and trips. Phoenix's regional partners utilize the same software to
ensure multi-jurisdictional trips operate seamlessly.

This request is to extend licensing and maintenance for the software, as well as utilize
the vendor's professional services to migrate the database environment, in preparation
for upgrading the software to the latest version. This request includes training needed
to ensure a successful upgrade and utilization of the enhancements in the upgraded
software version.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
This amendment will extend the contract term for an additional two years through Nov.
30, 2025, with three optional one-year extensions to Nov. 30, 2028.

Financial Impact
This request is for an additional $1,108,545 (including tax), for a total aggregate
contract value of $2,123,327.




Page 189


Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously approved this request:

· Contract for Maintenance of Software and Licensing Services with Trapeze
Software Group, Inc. (Ordinance S-45099) on Nov. 7, 2018;
· Dial-A-Ride Service Web Portal Software License and Passenger Notification
License/Services Agreement Amendment (Ordinance S-47587) on May 19, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 190



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fuel Terminal Services Contract - RFA 24-FSD-024 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-50246)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Caljet of America, LLC to provide fuel storage and pipeline space for the Public Works
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $972,000.

Summary
The City of Phoenix Public Works Department is responsible for procuring fuel for the
majority of the City. This fuel must be moved through a pipeline, as well as stored and
blended locally for fuel trucks to distribute to designated citywide fuel sites. This
contract will provide pipeline receipts, guaranteed storage space, as well as loading
services at the rack with additive injection capabilities.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition, citing unusual nature. The City of
Phoenix requests storage space, blending and loading capabilities that are only
provided by a limited number of vendors, and due to the volume of fuel purchased, fuel
storage terminal services connected to the pipeline are currently required.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about Dec. 1, 2023, for a two-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The contract value for will not exceed $972,000 for the two-year term.

Funding is available in the Public Works Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Works
Department.


Page 191



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Carrier Brand Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Parts and Equipment
Agreement (Ordinance S-50254)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Russell Sigler, Inc. to purchase heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC)
parts and equipment on an as-needed basis. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The value of the agreement will not
exceed $510,000.

Summary
The Public Works Department is responsible for maintaining HVAC equipment in City-
owned facilities. Carrier brand HVAC systems are currently installed in various City
facilities and require brand specific parts to maintain and repair the systems. This
agreement will provide essential Carrier brand parts and equipment necessary to
maintain functional operation and longevity of existing HVAC systems in these
facilities. This agreement will also provide Carrier brand parts and equipment for the
Aviation and Phoenix Convention Center departments.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, normal competition was waived as
the result of a determination memo citing that Russell Sigler, Inc. is the sole source
provider in Arizona for Carrier brand HVAC parts and equipment.

Contract Term
The five-year term of the agreement will begin on or about Jan. 1, 2024.

Financial Impact
The value of the agreement will not exceed $510,000, including all applicable taxes,
with an estimated annual expenditure of $102,000.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and John Chan and
the Public Works, Aviation, and Phoenix Convention Center departments.




Page 192



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Apply for U.S. Department of Energy Consumer Electronics Battery Recycling,
Reprocessing, and Battery Collection Grant Opportunity for Federal Fiscal Year
2022-23 - Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Funding (Ordinance S-50269)

Request to retroactively authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for,
accept and, if awarded, enter into an agreement for disbursement of Federal funding
from the U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) through the Federal Fiscal Year 2022-
23 Consumer Electronics Battery Recycling, Reprocessing, and Battery Collection
Grant opportunity. If awarded, the funding will be used to conduct a multi-media and
education campaign focused on proper battery recycling and disposal. Further request
to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds
related to this item. Funding for this grant opportunity is available through the Federal
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The total grant funds applied for will not exceed $1.25
million, and the City would not be required to provide a local match.

Summary
The increasing prevalence of batteries in the national solid waste stream and the
introduction of more recycling markets present a unique opportunity to divert batteries
from the landfill. Additionally, lithium-ion batteries can pose a fire risk to the City's solid
waste collection trucks, transfer stations and material recovery facilities when
individuals improperly dispose of them. To protect human health and the environment
while advancing the City's circular economy initiatives and waste diversion goals, the
Public Works Department is working to increase residential recycling and proper
disposal of batteries.

The USDOE Consumer Electronics Battery Recycling, Reprocessing, and Battery
Collection Grant program aims to expand participation in consumer electronics battery
recycling programs. On Sept. 18, 2023, USDOE notified the City that they encourage
the submittal of a full grant application based on the City's submitted concept paper.
The grant application submittal was due within 30 days from this notification, or no
later than Oct. 18, 2023.

The Public Works Department is requesting retroactive authorization to submit an
application for grant funds of up to $1.25 million. If awarded, funding would be used by
the Public Works Department to implement a Citywide multi-media and education


Page 193

campaign in partnership with the Communications Office and the City's marketing
contractor, O.H. Partners. The two-year campaign will educate residents about the
dangers of improper battery disposal and increase awareness of the City's Household
Hazardous Waste Home Collection Program. The grant was submitted prior to the
deadline of Oct. 18, 2023. If not authorized, the grant application can be withdrawn.
The Public Works Department is also requesting authorization to enter into
agreements to accept the funding if awarded.

Financial Impact
The estimated total project cost is approximately $1.25 million. The maximum federal
participation rate is 100 percent, with a minimum local match of zero percent of the
total eligible cost. If awarded, the federal match would not exceed $1.25 million and
the City’s costs would be approximately $0 for the local match.

There is no required cost share for the City. Potential grant funding received is
available through the Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, from USDOE through the
Federal Fiscal Year 2022-23 Consumer Electronics Battery Recycling, Reprocessing,
and Battery Collection Grant program.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the
Communications Office and Public Works Department.




Page 194



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Name Change on City Agreement to CONSOR North America, Inc. - Amendment
(Ordinance S-50238)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment
with Project Engineering Consultants, LTD. to Agreement 157885 for Sub-Regional
Operating Group (SROG) Southern Avenue Interceptor Condition Assessment
Engineering Services, to approve a name change to Consor North America, Inc.
Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary
within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
On Aug. 29, 2023, the City and Project Engineering Consultants, LTD. entered into
Agreement 157885 for the SROG Southern Avenue Interceptor Condition Assessment
Engineering Services.

This amendment is necessary because on Dec. 3, 2022, Project Engineering
Consultants, LTD. notified the City of Phoenix of its name change from Project
Engineering Consultants, LTD. to Consor North America, Inc. and is now operating
under the name of Consor North America, Inc.

The Southern Avenue Interceptor is owned by SROG and operated by the City of
Phoenix.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement remains unchanged.

Financial Impact
The agreement value remains unchanged.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The SROG Advisors authorized the project on June 16, 2022.
The City Council approved Engineering Services Agreement #157885 (Ordinance S-
49451) on March 1, 2023.



Page 195

Location
Southern Avenue from 48th Street to 51st Avenue, continuing to 91st Avenue between
Southern Avenue and Broadway Road
Council Districts: 7, 8 and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Alan
Stephenson, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.




Page 196



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Drought Resiliency Groundwater Program - Engineering Services - WS85010030,
WS85010054, WS85010059, WS85400007 (Ordinance S-50240)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Wilson Engineers, LLC to provide Engineering Services that include planning,
design, construction administration and inspection, system evaluation, and plan
updates for the Drought Resiliency Groundwater project. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $20 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide engineering services for the installation of up
to six new production wells and potentially rehabilitate or re-drill up to four existing
inactive production wells. The new wells will be used to augment the City's potable
water resources during time of long-term water shortages, emergency outages, and
meeting potable system demand balancing.

Wilson Engineers, LLC's services include, but are not limited to: assisting the City with
siting of the new production wells, providing assistance and coordination with Water
Services staff and other consultants and contractors as required for the drilling of
boreholes and test wells at the candidate sites, providing assessments and
recommendations of select inactive wells to evaluate potential rehabilitation and
reactivation, and coordinating with City Water Resources staff and the Arizona


Page 197

Department of Water Resources on permitting of the new sites.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Five firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Wilson Engineers, LLC

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Carollo Engineers, Inc.
Rank 3: Hazen and Sawyer, P.C.
Rank 4: Brown and Caldwell, Inc.
Rank 5: Black & Veatch Corporation

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Wilson Engineers, LLC will not exceed $20 million, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Alan
Stephenson, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.




Page 198



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Hot Mix Asphalt Products Requirements Contract - RFQu 18-206 - Letter of
Agreement to Extend Contract with CalMat, Co. (Ordinance S-50242)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a letter of
agreement with CalMat, Co. for the limited purpose of creating an interim term to
continue to conduct business while new contracts are procured. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. No additional
funds are needed; request to continue using Ordinance S-44479.

Summary
This contract provides cold and hot mix asphalt and emulsion binder material
throughout the City for regular patching, paving, and street maintenance projects. The
existing contract expired on April 30, 2023. The City and vendor agreed to continue
operations under the existing terms until a new competitive procurement process was
completed and new contracts were issued on June 15, 2023. This action will allow the
City to administratively reconcile outstanding invoices in the system as part of the
contract close-out process.

Contract Term
The term of the Letter of Agreement will administratively extend the contract from April
30, 2023, through Nov. 30, 2023, for the purpose of reconciling outstanding invoices.

Financial Impact
The five-year aggregate contract value of $11,232,500 as originally approved will not
be exceeded by this action. Funds are available in the Street Transportation
Department's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Asphalt Binder Emulsion, Cold Mix and Hot Mix Asphalt Contract RFQu 23-078
(Ordinance S-49835) on June 14, 2023;
· Hot Mix Asphalt Products, Requirements Contract, RFQu 18-206 (Ordinance S-
44479) on April 18, 2018.




Page 199

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 200



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Val Vista Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation 2023 - Engineering Services -
WS85230059 (Ordinance S-50256)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Carollo Engineers, Inc. to provide Engineering Services that include assessment,
design, and possible construction administration and inspection services for the Val
Vista Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation 2023 project. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $11.8 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to rehabilitate the following treatment systems at the Val
Vista Water Treatment Plant: Chemical Feed Stations, West Plant Bar Screens, Solid
Handling Facility Polymer Feed System, Sludge Collectors, Reservoir Electrical
Building, East Plant Sedimentation Basins 4-6 launders, and East Plant Raw Water
Pumps.

Carollo Engineers, Inc. will work together with the selected Construction Manager at
Risk, City of Phoenix Water Services Engineering Division, and the operating staff to
design and construct a project that is within budget and meets the City's needs. The
firm will perform a comprehensive condition assessment and provide
recommendations for repairs and/or rehabilitation which may include mechanical,
electrical and/or structural assets.


Page 201


Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Two firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Additional Proposer
Rank 2: Black & Veatch Corp.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Carollo Engineers, Inc. will not exceed $11.8 million,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
Intersection of McDowell Road and Lindsay Road in Mesa, Ariz.
Council District: Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Alan
Stephenson, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.




Page 202



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
24th Street Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation 2021 - Construction Manager at
Risk Construction Services Amendment - WS85290032 (Ordinance S-50257)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 154723 with PCL Construction, Inc. to provide additional Construction
Services for the 24th Street Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation 2021 project. Further
request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within
the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional fee for services
included in this amendment will not exceed $24.3 million.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to address the repair or replacement of raw water pump
station valves, flow meters, flocculation basin inlet channel hydraulic modifications,
gates and probes, sedimentation basin weir plate, filter effluent pipes, meters,
chemical feed area piping, chemical and maintenance building minor repairs, solids
handling backwash equalization basin pumps, sludge blanket monitoring, backwash
clarifier mechanism, various electrical equipment such as transformers, standby
generators, electrical panels, and modifications at the administration building area,
electrical building, and chemical building.

This amendment is necessary to provide continued construction services focused on
rehabilitation and improvements at solids handling facilities, chemical feed area, pre-
sedimentation basin pump station, and miscellaneous electrical modifications
associated with the rehab work. This amendment will provide additional funds to the
agreement.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement remains unchanged.

Financial Impact
· The initial agreement for Preconstruction and Construction Services was approved
for an amount not to exceed $300,000, including all subcontractor and reimbursable
costs.



Page 203

· An amendment was approved for an additional $10,242,943, including all
subcontractor and reimbursable costs, for a new total amount not to exceed
$10,542,943, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
· This amendment will increase the agreement by an additional $24.3 million, for a
new total amount not to exceed $34,842,943, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.

Funding for this amendment is available in the Water Services Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately
review and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Preconstruction and Construction Services Agreement 154723 (Ordinance S-
47776) on July 1, 2021; and
· Construction Services Agreement 154723 Amendment (Ordinance S-49494) on
March 22, 2023.

Location
24th Street Water Treatment Plant
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Alan
Stephenson, the Water Services Department and the City Engineer.




Page 204



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Apply for U.S. Department of Transportation Reconnecting Communities and
Neighborhoods Grant Opportunity for Federal Fiscal Year 2022-23 - Federal
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Funding (Ordinance S-50259)

Request to retroactively authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for,
accept and, if awarded, enter into agreement(s) for disbursement of Federal funding
from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) through the Federal Fiscal Year
(FFY) 2022-23 Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods (RCN) Program grant
opportunity. If awarded, the funding will be used to initiate a planning grant and/or a
capital construction grant. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept,
and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. Funding for these
grant opportunities is available through the Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and
the Inflation Reduction Act. The total grant funds applied for will not exceed $31
million, and the City's local match would not exceed $5.5 million for both grants.

Summary
The RCN grant is a new funding program under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law,
which was signed into law on Nov. 15, 2021. The USDOT issued a Notice of Funding
Opportunity on July 5, 2023. The RCN grant is a re-branded program in its second
year which combined Reconnecting Communities Pilot and Neighborhood Access and
Equity programs into a single funding opportunity for FFY 2022-23. Together, this
combined program now known as RCN aims to fund projects that consider these
specific goals and objectives:
· Prioritize disadvantaged communities;
· Aim to improve access to daily needs such as jobs, education, health care, food,
and recreation;
· Foster equitable development and restoration; and
· Reconnect communities by removing, retrofitting, or mitigating highways or other
transportation facilities that create barriers to community connectivity, including
mobility, access or economic development.

The City intends to submit for two grants: a planning grant to study important
connections within the Maryvale Village; and a capital construction grant to focus on
connectivity and improvements 1) from the future Rio Reimagined Bicycle and


Page 205

Pedestrian Bridge, funded by the City’s FFY 2021-22 Rebuilding American
Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant award and 2) to future PHX
Cultural Corridor project, funded by the City’s FFY 2022-23 RAISE grant award.

Planning Grant Application
The planning grant application will study important connections within the Maryvale
Village, approximately bounded by: Camelback Road to the north, Encanto Boulevard
to the south, 75th Avenue to the west, and 43rd Avenue to the east. The Reconnecting
Maryvale project is estimated to cost up to $6 million, with no local match required, due
to the proposed project boundary being located 100 percent within a disadvantaged
community.

Capital Construction Grant Application
The capital construction grant will focus on connectivity from the future Rio
Reimagined Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge along the 3rd Street alignment to Jefferson
Street, including improvements to Buckeye Road from Central Avenue to 7th Street,
connecting to the future PHX Cultural Corridor. The capital construction project for the
3rd Street Connector from the Rio Salado to Jefferson Street and Buckeye Road is
estimated up to $25 million, with a minimum local match requirement of 0-20 percent
of the total project cost, due to the majority of the boundary (94.4 percent) being in a
disadvantaged community.

The RCN grant submittal deadline was Sept. 28, 2023. Since internal selection of the
specific grants was carefully considered, this impacted staff's ability to request
authorization ahead of the grant submittal deadline.

Financial Impact
The estimated total costs for the projects are up to $6 million for the planning grant and
up to $25 million for the capital construction grant. The maximum federal participation
rate for the planning grant is 100 percent with a minimum local match of 0 percent of
the total eligible project cost and the maximum federal participation rate for the capital
construction grant is 80-100 percent with a minimum local match of 0-20 percent of the
total eligible project cost. If awarded the planning grant, the federal match would not
exceed $6 million and the City’s costs would be approximately $0 for the local match. If
awarded the capital construction grant, the federal match would not exceed $20-25
million and the City’s costs would be approximately $0-5.5 million for the local match, if
match is required.

Funding for the local match is available in the Street Transportation Department's
Capital Improvement Program budget. Potential grant funding received is available
through the Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, from USDOT through the FFY 2022-


Page 206

23 RCN grant opportunity.

Location
Planning Grant
75th to 43rd avenues, Encanto Boulevard to Camelback Road

Capital Construction Grant
3rd Street from the Rio Salado to Jefferson Street; and Buckeye Road from Central
Avenue to 7th Street
Council Districts: 4, 5, 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Alan Stephenson and Mario
Paniagua, and the Street Transportation Department.




Page 207



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Enter into an Agreement with the Salt River Project Agricultural
Improvement and Power District, Honeywell International, Inc., and the Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality (Ordinance S-50263)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District (SRP), Honeywell
International, Inc. (Honeywell), and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ) to facilitate sampling of up to 180 groundwater wells within the West Van
Buren Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund (WQARF) site area. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
As part of the ongoing remediation and monitoring of water quality at the WQARF site,
SRP, Honeywell and Phoenix have agreed to fund water quality sampling in the area.
ADEQ will procure a contractor for the sampling program and will be reimbursed by the
other parties. ADEQ’s contractor will sample water from up to 180 wells in and around
the site. Groundwater level data, monthly performance reports, groundwater sample
analytical data (including raw data), validation reports and a final groundwater
monitoring report will be provided to all parties.

Contract Term
This agreement will commence on the date of execution by all parties and continue in
full force and effect until June 30, 2024, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the
terms of the agreement.

Financial Impact
The total agreement cost will be up to $189,823.00 for the contract term, of which
Phoenix will be responsible for one third, or a maximum of $63,275.00. Funding is
available in the Water Services Department’s operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On July 3, 2019, the City Council approved Ordinance S-45909 authorizing the City
Manager to enter into a similar groundwater sampling agreement with ADEQ .




Page 208

Location
West Van Buren WQARF Site
Council Districts: 4, 7, and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.




Page 209



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Oracle Customer Care and Billing (Ordinance S-50271)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to grant an exemption from
the indemnification and liability provisions of section 42 - 18 of the City Code and allow
inclusions of indemnification and limitation of liability provisions in the agreement with
Ernst & Young U.S., LLP as previously authorized by Ordinance S-49720 for the
technical upgrade to the Oracle Customer Care and Billing (CC&B). No additional
funds are needed.

Summary
Ernst & Young U.S., LLP was selected through a competitive process to perform a
technical upgrade to Oracle CC&B software. The Water Services Department, in
conjunction with the Information Technology Services, Public Works and Finance
departments, provide a customer information and billing system for water, wastewater,
solid waste services, and other applicable taxes and fees.

This CC&B upgrade aims at optimizing the base features while minimizing the
customizations to strategically enhance security, streamline processes, increase
interoperability/intergration, increase customer satisfaction, improve flexibility to meet
changing needs, and leverage best practices.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
This is a three-year contract term, with two one-year options to extend for a maximum
five-year contract term.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact related to this request, as funding for this agreement was
approved as part of Ordinance S-49720. This request is only for authorization to grant
an exception from the indemnification and liability provisions of City Code section 42 -
18.




Page 210

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This contract was originally approved by City Council on May 31, 2023 (Ordinance S-
49720).

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Mario Paniagua,
and the Water Services and Public Works departments.




Page 211



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - 3233 W. Peoria Avenue - PLAT 230043 - Southeast Corner of 33rd
Avenue and Peoria Avenue

Plat: 230043
Project: 21-1748
Name of Plat: 3233 W. Peoria Avenue
Owner: Simoncre Buddy III, LLC
Engineer: James M. Williamson, RLS
Request: A Three-Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Sept. 11, 2023
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the southeast corner of 33rd Avenue and Peoria Avenue
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 212



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Indian School and 91st Avenue - PLAT 230050 - Southwest Corner of
Indian School Road and 91st Avenue

Plat: 230050
Project: 21-4275
Name of Plat: Indian School and 91st Avenue
Owner: BTR at 91st Ave and Indian School
Engineer: Douglas B. Toney, RLS
Request: A One-Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Aug. 24, 2023
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the southwest corner of Indian School Road and 91st Avenue
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 213



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - 99th & McDowell Mixed Use - PLAT 230057 - North of McDowell Road
and East of 99th Avenue

Plat: 230057
Project: 21-1694
Name of Plat: 99th & McDowell Mixed Use
Owner: TT AZ Phoenix 99th McDowell, LLC
Engineer: Robert A. Johnston, RLS
Request: A Seven-Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: Sept. 11, 2023
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located north of McDowell Road and east of 99th Avenue
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 214



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - McKinney Vehicle Services - PLAT 230044 - Southeast Corner of Van
Buren Street and 67th Avenue

Plat: 230044
Project: 01-889
Name of Plat: McKinney Vehicle Services
Owner: 67th & Van Buren, LLC
Engineer: James G. Spring, RLS
Request: A One-Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: July 25, 2023
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the southeast corner of Van Buren Street and 67th Avenue
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 215



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 230044 - 3629 East Dunlap Ave. (Resolution
22161)

Abandonment: ABND 230044
Project: 04-2519
Applicant: Camelback Keller, LLC
Request: To abandon the drainage easement Book 238 Page 29 per Maricopa County
Recorder.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Aug. 11, 2023

Location
3629 East Dunlap Ave.
Council District: 3

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Article 5, section 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges
the public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the city,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

None. No fees were collected as apart of this easement abandonment, although filing
fees were paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 216



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Right-of-Way - V180023A - Black Canyon and Mariposa Street
(Resolution 22160)

Abandonment: V180023A
Project: 17-2334
Applicant: Black Canyon Self-Storage
Request: To abandon the alley right-of-way bounded by Mariposa and Pierson Streets,
26th Avenue and Black Canyon Highway access road.
Date of Decision/Hearing: May 22, 2018

Location
Black Canyon and Mariposa Street
Council District: 4

Financial Impact
A consideration fee was also collected as part of this right-of-way abandonment in the
amount of $24,026.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 217



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 230016 - Southwest Corner of 31st Street
and Coolidge Street (Resolution 22162)

Abandonment: ABND 230016
Project: 99-37221
Applicant: Lauren Proper Potter / Huellmantel & Affiliates
Request: To abandon cross-retention/cross-drainage easements along the east, south,
and west boundaries of the project as well as down the center of the shared private
driveway extending from Coolidge Street south approximately 100 feet.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Aug. 31, 2023

Location
Southwest corner of 31st Street and Coolidge Street
Council District: 6

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Article 5, section 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges
the public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the city,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

None. No consideration fee was required as apart of this easement abandonment,
although filing fees were paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 218



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 220067 - Southeast Corner of Buckeye Road
and 27th Avenue (Resolution 22164)

Abandonment: ABND 220067
Project: 21-3589
Applicant: Jeff Hunter
Request: To abandon sewer easements 300 feet south of Buckeye Road, DKT 3921,
PG 20 and DKT 3921, PG 22 and DKT 3973, PG 233.
Date of Decision/Hearing: June 21, 2023

Location
Southeast Corner of Buckeye Road and 27th Avenue
Council District: 7

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Article 5, section 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges
the public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the city,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

None. No fee was required as apart of this easement abandonment, although filing
fees were paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 219



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Alley - ABND 220058 - Northwest Corner of Garfield Street and
24th Street (Resolution 22163)

Abandonment: ABND 220058
Project: 94-002750
Applicant: Hanamaki Investments LLC
Request: To abandon the alley located at the Northwest corner of Garfield Street and
24th Street.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Feb. 23, 2023

Location
Northwest corner of Garfield Street and 24th Street
Council District: 8

Financial Impact
A consideration fee was also collected as part of this abandonment in the amount of
$14,307.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 220



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1253 (Ordinance G-7178)

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1253. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with a portion of Z-SP-15-86-1(3).

Summary
To rezone property located at the northwest corner of 54th Street and Shea Boulevard
and approximately 820 feet west of the northwest corner of 54th Street and Shea
Boulevard
Application Number: A portion of Z-SP-15-86-1(3)
Zoning: C-O SP and PAD-2 SP
Owners: GHJ Investments, LLC and Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC
Acreage: 7.33

Location
Northwest corner of 54th Street and Shea Boulevard and approximately 820 feet west
of the northwest corner of 54th Street and Shea Boulevard
Address: 5310 and 5320 E. Shea Blvd.
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 221
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1253.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1253, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 18th day of October,

2023.



_____________________________________
MAYOR




ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




Page 222
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:_________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




PL:arm:LF23-2278:10-18-2023




Page 223
Page 224



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1252 (Ordinance G-7177)

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1252. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with a portion of Z-8-90-7 and the entitlements are fully
vested.

Summary
To rezone a parcel located on the south side of Sunland Drive, beginning
approximately 208 feet east of 39th Avenue.
Application No.: Z-8-90-7
Zoning: R1-6
Owner: Multiple owners
Acreage: 5.00

Location
Located on the south side of Sunland Drive, beginning approximately 208 feet east of
39th Avenue
Address: Multiple addresses
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 225
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1252.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1252, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 18th day of October,

2023.



_____________________________________
MAYOR




ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




Page 226
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:_________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




PL:arm:LF23-2197:10-4-2023




Page 227
Page 228



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Approval of Historic Preservation Demonstration Project Grant - Hotel San
Carlos - 202 N. Central Ave. (Ordinance S-50266)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into necessary
agreements and conveyances with Rockbridge (RB Phoenix LLC), related to a
Demonstration Project Grant of up $500,000 to assist with rehabilitation of the historic
Hotel San Carlos at 202 N. Central Ave. Further request authorization for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The building at 202 N. Central Ave. was constructed in 1928 as the Hotel San Carlos.
The seven-story building is constructed of reinforced concrete with a stucco surface
made to resemble stone. The hotel was one of the first in Phoenix to include steam
heat, elevators, and air cooling, making it significant in its support of tourism in the
1920s. Alterations to the main building since initial construction include the
construction of a rear concrete block addition, replacement of the original storefronts
and upper windows, and the addition of a rooftop pool and penthouse mechanical and
storage rooms.

The property was listed in the Phoenix Historic Property Register in 1987. In 1993, the
City provided $25,000 in Demonstration Project funds for the exterior rehabilitation of
the building, which included new roofing; rehabilitation of the penthouse walls,
windows and doors; restoration of missing canopies, exterior lighting and signage; and
cleaning of exterior walls.

The building is currently owned by Rockbridge (RB Phoenix LLC), who is undertaking
a complete rehabilitation of the historic hotel. RB Phoenix LLC is seeking City
assistance for exterior work, including the selective demolition of alterations and
enlargements constructed outside of the building’s period of significance; structural
repairs; façade restoration and repair; reinstatement and unification of historically
accurate window and storefront systems; roof restoration and repair; and the
replacement in-kind of exterior lighting fixtures.

Financial Impact
This item will have no impact on the General Fund. The requested grant amount is


Page 229

$500,000, and the funding for the grant is available and has been programmed in the
Community and Economic Development Department's budget within the Downtown
Community Reinvestment Fund. In exchange for the grant funds, the project will create
net new jobs and tax revenues and support the further revitalization of downtown
Phoenix through the increased utilization of a historic property that has been a
landmark in Phoenix’s history for 95 years. The property owner has also agreed to
record a new 40-year conservation easement on the entire property that will replace
the previous easement.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· The Historic Preservation Hearing Officer approved a Certificate of Appropriateness
for the project on July 12, 2023.
· The Historic Preservation Commission recommended approval of the grant funding
on Aug. 21, 2023, by a vote of 8-0.
· The Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee heard the item on
Sept. 20, 2023, and recommended approval by a vote of 4-0.

Location
202 N. Central Ave.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Alan Stephenson and John Chan, and
the Planning and Development and Community and Economic Development
departments.




Page 230



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-DSTV-1
-23-2 - Generally Located South of the 101 Freeway, East of 56th Street, West of
64th Street, and North of the Reach 11 (Ordinance G-7179)

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
and to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related
ordinance if approved. Request to amend the Desert Ridge Specific Plan.

Summary
Application: GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Proposal: Amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan for Development Parcels
3.CP/BP.1 and 3.CP/BP.2 to facilitate the Mayo Clinic expansion including integrated
clinical practice, education and research, as well as the creation of a new "Discovery
Oasis" biotech and healthcare corridor.
Acreage: 417.63 acres

Owner: Arizona State Land Department
Applicant/Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in Exhibit A.
VPC Information Only: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case
on April 4, 2023, for information only.
VPC Action: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 2,
2023, and continued the case, by a vote of 9-0. The Desert View Village Planning
Committee heard this case on June 6, 2023, and continued the case, by a vote of 10-
0. The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 1, 2023, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 10-1.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Oct. 5, 2023, and
recommended approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report, by a vote of 6-0.

Location
Generally located south of the 101 Freeway, east of 56th Street, west of 64th Street,
and north of the Reach 11.
Council District: 2
Parcel Addresses: Several


Page 231


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 232
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6 OF THE DESERT
RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN, ADOPTED JULY 18, 1990,
REFLECTING AMENDMENTS TO SUPERBLOCK 3,
DEVELOPMENT PARCELS 3.CP/BP.1 AND 3.CP/BP.2 AS SET
FORTH IN APPLICATION GPA-DSTV-1-23-2, DESCRIBED
HEREIN.

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Chapter 6, (Development Parcel Regulations), Section

C.4.D (Non-Core Parcel Regulations, Modified City of Phoenix Commerce

Park/Business Park Regulations Imposed by Desert Ridge Specific Plan), Pages 6-10

to 6-11 of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan, be amended as set forth by Application GPA-

DSTV-1-23-2 and in Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference is made a part

hereof.

SECTION 2. That Chapter 6 (Development Parcel Regulations), Section

C.5. (Development Regulations by Superblock), Pages 6-18 to 6-24 of the Desert Ridge

Specific Plan, be amended as set forth by Application GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 and in Exhibit

A, attached hereto and by this reference is made a part hereof.




Page 233
SECTION 3. Appendices A.2 (Plant Lists) of the Desert Ridge Specific

Plan, be amended as set forth by Application GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 and in Exhibit A,

attached hereto and by this reference is made a part hereof.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 18th day of October,

2023.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




Page 234
Exhibits:
A – Amendment Language (58 Pages)




Page 235
EXHIBIT A

Amend Chapter 6 (Development Parcel Regulations), Section C.4.D (Non-Core
Parcel Regulations, Modified City of Phoenix Commerce Park/Business Park
Regulations Imposed by Desert Ridge Specific Plan), Pages 6-10 to 6-11 as
follows:

***

Site Plan Requirement

1. A site plan is required for all CP/BP development parcels.

Design Standards

1. All parcels, EXCEPT AS NOTED.

a. Building Height/Setback Relationship: Height is limited to 18 feet within 30
feet of lot lines, with one additional foot of height for every additional foot
of setback to the otherwise permitted maximum height. DEVELOPMENT
PARCELS IN SUPERBLOCK 3 ARE EXEMPT.

b. Required Parking Lot and Wall Setbacks:

1) Tatum Boulevard, 56th Street, 64th Street and Avenue K MAYO
BOULEVARD (FORMERLY AVENUE K): 50 feet minimum from
street right-of-way.

2) 52nd Street, Pima Freeway and all other streets: 30 feet minimum
from right-of-way, EXCEPT FOR THE PORTION OF PIMA
FREEWAY WHICH ABUTS SUPERBLOCK 3 SHALL BE 10 FEET
MINIMUM FROM RIGHT-OF-WAY.

3) All other lot lines except lot lines which abut Reach 11: Parking lots
must be 10 feet minimum from all lot lines; there is no minimum
setback from lot lines for walls. NO MINIMUM SETBACK FOR
SUPERBLOCK 3 PARCELS.

c. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be required in all street rights-of-way,
building and parking lot setback area, parking areas and open space
areas pursuant to City of Phoenix requirements, except that a minimum of
25% of the required trees shall be 24-inch box or larger.

d. Walls and Fences: Walls and fences located within or adjacent to a
building or parking lot setback which is adjacent to Tatum Boulevard, 56th
Street, 64th Street, MAYO BOULEVARD (FORMELY AVENUE K), and




Page 236
52nd Street shall not exceed eight feet in height. Walls and fences
adjacent to all other streets and interior and perimeter lot lines shall not
exceed eight feet in height.

e. Screening: Loading, service, storage, delivery, refuse collection and
parking area must be screened with landscaping, walls or berming (or
combinations thereof) so as to be non-visible when standing six feet in
height on the boundary lines of adjacent streets and properties. Rooftop
treatment shall screen exposure of pipes and mechanical equipment from
view so as to be non-visible when standing six feet in height on the
boundary lines of adjacent streets and properties. Exhaust stacks are
exempt from these screening requirements.

2. Developments Abutting Reach 11: Reach 11 will be developed as a regional
recreational area with a variety of facilities which will provide active and passive
recreational opportunities. Development adjacent to Reach 11 should be
encouraged to consider the recreational facilities as site amenities that have the
long term potential to enhance adjacent land uses. Where a development abuts
Reach 11, the following standards shall apply:

a. Setbacks and Building Height: Buildings shall be set back an average of
100 feet from the Reach 11 property line. If any portion of a building is
over 56 feet in height, the setback for the portion of the building shall be
increased one foot for every one foot of height over 56 feet, up to the
maximum permitted height. The first 60 feet of setback from Reach 11
shall remain as a buffer of open space with native-plant landscaping.
Parking and walls may be placed with a maximum of 50% of the balance
of the setback area. Any buildings with window treatments, architectural
facades/building designs, landscape designs, etc., which focus on Reach
11 may reduce the required average setback to 60 feet, as approved by
the PLANNING AND Development Services Department.
DEVELOPMENT PARCELS IN SUPERBLOCK 3 ARE EXEMPT,
EXCEPT THAT A MINIMUM 65-FOOT SETBACK SHALL BE REQUIRED
FROM REACH 11 REGARDLESS OF BUILDING HEIGHT.

b. Fencing: If fencing is used at the perimeter of the property or within the
required setback as permitted in the immediately preceding paragraph, it
should be view fencing or an acceptable substitute as permitted by the
PLANNING AND Development Services Department, and Parks AND
Recreation DEPARTMENT, and Library Department. Chain link fencing is
prohibited, except where used within the interior of the site and only where
it is not visible from the exterior property boundaries, as approved by the
PLANNING AND Development Services Department.

c. Building Architecture/Screening: All building evaluations ELEVATIONS
shall include a mix of building material, vertical and horizontal elements




Page 237
around the entire building, and shall maintain a campus continuity.
Loading, service, storage, deliver, refuse collection and parking areas
which face Reach 11 must be screened from view. Rooftop treatment shall
screen exposure of pipes and mechanical equipment form view of Reach
11. Exhaust stacks are exempt from these screening requirements.

***

Amend Chapter 6 (Development Parcel Regulations), Section C.5. (Development
Regulations by Superblock), Pages 6-18 to 6-24 as follows:

***

SUPERBLOCK 3

Superblock 3 is located south of the Pima Freeway, between 56th Street, 64th Street
and Reach 11. This superblock is an area designated for medically-related commerce
park economic development efforts. The uses, zoning, and development standards,
AND DESIGN GUIDELINES included in this amendment are specifically intended to
address these issues SUPPORT SUCH USES.

3.CP/BP.1 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1

Size: 210 186.18 162.30 acres
Uses Permitted: Permitted uses shall be as indicated in Section 626, Commerce
Park District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
(Supp. dated 4/19/95) (Ref. Appendix A.7), as modified below.

Potential APPLICABLE Zoning to Be Applied: CP/BP as per Section 626 of the
this chapter. This zoning is to be WAS applied upon City Council approval of the
1995 Major Amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan relating to this
superblock.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: THE FOLLOWING SECTION HAS A
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK THAT INCLUDES A “BASE” SECTION AND AN
“ENHANCED” SECTION. THE “BASE” SECTION INCLUDES PERMITTED
USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY RIGHT
WITHOUT TRIGGERING ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THE
“ENHANCED” SECTION INCLUDES ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT ARE ONLY ALLOWED TO BE USED
SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THIS
SECTION FURTHER BELOW.

Special Conditions and Requirements I. BASE PERMITTED USES AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:




Page 238
1. Commerce Park uses are allowed subject to the standards described in
Section C.4.D of this chapter.

2. 1. Additional Permitted Uses/Development Conditions: The following is a list
of modifications to the permitted uses included in Section 626, Commerce
Park District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance which shall apply exclusively to Development Parcel
3.CP/BP.1:

a. Manufacturing related to medical, pharmaceutical and biotechnical
products or equipment. Manufacturing shall include the fabrication
and assembly of finished products or sub-assemblies, so long as
the primary use of the property is not the basic processing and
compounding of raw materials or food products.

COMMERCE PARK (BUSINESS PARK OPTION) USES,
SUBJECT TO THE STANDARDS DESCRIBED IN SECTION C.4.D
OF THIS CHAPTER.

b. Multiple MULTIfamily attached residential. uses at a minimum
density of 17.0 dwelling units per gross acre.

c. B. Retail uses. The maximum gross leasable area for any one
tenant/user shall be 5,000 square feet. The maximum aggregate
gross leasable area of retail uses in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1
shall be 50,000 square feet.
NON-RESIDENTIAL USES PERMITTED PER SECTION 622,
COMMERCIAL C-1 DISTRICT, OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:

1) SUCH USES ARE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 5% OF
THE NET AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
500,000 SQUARE FEET IN GROSS FLOOR AREA.

2) OF THE 5% OF THE NET AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL, 50% OF SUCH USES ARE LIMITED TO BEING
INTERNAL TO A BUILDING (NOT STAND-ALONE USES).

32) THE MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR ANY ONE
TENANT OR USER SHALL NOT EXCEED 10,000 SQUARE
FEET.

4) EACH NEW DEVELOPMENT SHALL UPDATE THE MAYO
CLINIC MASTER SITE PLAN TO TRACK THESE
PERCENTAGES.




Page 239
C.D. MEDICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOTECHNICAL
PRODUCTS OR EQUIPMENT, MANUFACTURING

2. MAXIMUM DENSITY: 200 DWELLING UNITS.

3. 2. Building Setbacks: Buildings must be setback a minimum of 100 feet and
an average of 125 feet from 56th Street, 64th Street and Avenue K.
Buildings must be setback 50 feet from all other streets, and the Pima
Freeway. Buildings must be setback 30 feet from all other lot lines.

A. ADJACENT TO MAYO BOULEVARD, 56TH STREET AND 64TH
STREET: MINIMUM 100 FEET, AVERAGE OF 125 FEET

B. ALL OTHER PUBLIC STREETS: MINIMUM 50 FEET

C. PRIVATE STREETS: MINIMUM 25 FEET

D. INTERIOR LOT LINES: 0 FEET

E. ADJACENT TO REACH 11: PER SECTION C.4.D, DESIGN
STANDARDS 2.A, OF THIS CHAPTER.

4. 3. Floor Area Ratio: 0.20 overall limit for development parcel; individual
developments may be up to 0.25.

4. 5. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 56 FEET. MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHTS ARE EXCLUSIVE OF (DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL
FACILITIES ON TOP OF BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL
HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHTS
SPECIFIED BELOW TO ACCOUNT FOR THESE MECHANICAL
FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED SCREENING.

5. LOT COVERAGE: MAXIMUM 50% FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

6. COMMON OPEN SPACE: MINIMUM 10% OF GROSS DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL AREA, ALLOCATED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL AREA.

7. STREET STANDARDS:

A. MAYO BOULEVARD CROSS SECTION: THE 24-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE MEDIAN ALONG MAYO BOULEVARD MAY BE
REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR WIDENED AND BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT. LANDSCAPE MEDIANS SHALL BE PLANTED TO




Page 240
THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANARDS PER SECTION
3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE PATH
EASEMENTS: SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE
PATH EASEMENTS SHALL BE DEDICATED WHERE
NECESSARY TO PERMIT DETACHED SIDEWALKS AND
SHARED-USE PATHS, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. MAYO BOULEVARD (NORTH SIDE): A DETACHED SIDEWALK
SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE
STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND
SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE NORTH
SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD, PLANTED TO THE
STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION
3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

D. MAYO BOULEVARD (SOUTH SIDE): WITH RESPECT TO
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-
WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF
CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE
SOUTH SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD, EXCEPT WHERE THERE
ARE EXISTING SIDEWALKS, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF
THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING
SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

E. 56TH STREET (SOUTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): THE EXISTING
LANDSCAPE STRIP ON THE EAST SIDE OF 56TH STREET
ADJACENT TO THE DETACHED SIDEWALK SHALL BE
REPLENISHED AND PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 8.D.1 OF THIS
CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

FE. 56TH STREET (NORTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): A MINIMUM
10-FOOT-WIDE DETACHED SIDEWALK, WHICH MAY BE
LOCATED WITHIN AN EASEMENT, SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM




Page 241
10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE
BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF 56TH STREET, PLANTED TO THE
STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION
3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

GF. 64TH STREET: A DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A
MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED
BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF 64TH STREET,
PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND
MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

HG. PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LOCAL STREETS: MINIMUM 5-FOOT-
WIDE DETACHED SIDEWALKS SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 5-
FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIPS LOCATED BETWEEN THE
BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
FOR PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LOCAL STREETS, PLANTED TO
THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION
3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

IH. SHARED-USE PATH ON NORTH SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD:
A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH EASEMENT
(SUPE) SHALL BE DEDICATED AND A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-
WIDE SHARED-USE PATH (SUP) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN THE EASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG
SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED
BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE
SUP MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED
DETACHED SIDEWALK WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IF THE
LANDSCAPE STRIP IS PROVIDED PER SECTION 7.C OF THIS
CHAPTER.

J. SHARED-USE PATH ON WEST SIDE OF 64TH STREET:
SUBJECT TO ANY APPLICABLE ADOT STANDARDS NORTH OF
MAYO BOULEVARD, A 10-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH
EASEMENT (SUPE) SHALL BE DEDICATED AND A MINIMUM
10-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH (SUP) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND AS APPROVED




Page 242
OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE SUP MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF THE
REQUIRED DETACHED SIDEWALK WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-
WAY IF THE LANDSCAPE STRIP IS PROVIDED PER SECTION
7.GF OF THIS CHAPTER.

K. MULTI-USE TRAIL CONNECTING TO REACH 11: A 10-FOOT-
WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE) SHALL BE
DEDICATED WITHIN THE EASTERN EDGE OF DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, AND A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-
USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE
EASEMENT TO CONNECT SOUTH TO REACH 11 TRAILS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND
AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

LK. LANDSCAPE STRIP REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION: IN AREAS
WHERE DRAINAGE CULVERTS, RIGHT TURN LANES AND BUS
BAYS OCCUR AND LIMIT AVAILABLE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STRIPS OF THIS SECTION MAY BE
REDUCED OR ELIMINATED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORATION DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE SIDEWALKS
AND SHARED USE PATHWAYS MAY BE PROVIDED IN SUCH
AREAS WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT OFFSET.

8. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS:

A. MILKWEED OR NATIVE NECTAR SPECIES FOR MONARCH
BUTTERFLIES: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE REQUIRED
SHRUBS SHALL BE A MILKWEED OR OTHER NATIVE NECTAR
SPECIES AND SHALL BE PLANTED IN GROUPS OF THREE OR
MORE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS:

1) ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS AND
REACH 11: 25 FEET

2) ADJACENT TO PIMA FREEWAY: 10 FEET

3) ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
DEVELOPMENT WITH NO SHARED PARKING OR
SHARED DRIVEWAY: 5 FEET




Page 243
4) ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
DEVELOPMENT WITH SHARED PARKING OR SHARED
DRIVEWAY: 0 FEET

C. PARKING LOT AREAS: MINIMUM 10% OF INTERIOR SURFACE
AREA, EXCLUSIVE OF PERIMTER LANDSCAPING AND ALL
REQUIRED SETBACKS.

D. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE PLANTING STANDARDS:

1) STREETSCAPE:

A) TREES FOR 10-FOOT-WIDE OR WIDER
LANDSCAPE STRIPS: MINIMUM 3-INCH CALIPER
SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-
TOLERANT SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON
CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

B) TREES FOR 5-FOOT-WIDE, LESS THAN 10-FOOT-
WIDE, LANDSCAPE STRIPS: MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY
DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES PLANTED
20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS.

C) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE
GROUNDCOVERS MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM
OF 75% LIVE COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

D) UTILITY CONFLICTS: WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS
EXIST, THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ON AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN SOLUTION
CONSISTENT WITH A PEDESTRIAN
ENVIRONMENT.

2) LANDSCAPE SETBACKS:

A) TREES FOR 10-FOOT OR WIDER LANDSCAPE
SETBACKS: MINIMUM 50% 2-INCH CALIPER, 25%
3-INCH CALIPER AND 25% 4-INCH CALIPER
LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE
TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN
EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.




Page 244
B) TREES FOR LESS THAN 10-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE SETBACKS: MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER
OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

C) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE
GROUNDCOVERS TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF
50% LIVE COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

3) UNCOVERED PARKING AREAS:

A) TREES: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES
DISPERSED THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREA
TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM SHADING
REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 13
3.CP/BP.1.I.11.E OF THIS CHAPTER.

B) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE
GROUNDCOVERS MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM
OF 50% LIVE COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

4) COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RETENTION AREAS:

A) TREES: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES
DISPERSED THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREA
TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM SHADING
REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 13 OF THIS
CHAPTER PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN
EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS ALONG THE
PERIMETER OF OPEN SPACE AND RETENETION
AREAS.

B) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE
GROUNDCOVERS MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM
OF 50% LIVE COVERAGE AT MATURITY.




Page 245
9. VEHICULAR PARKING: OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WHEN SUPPORTED BY AN
APPROPRIATELY DOCUMENTED STUDY.

A. EV INSTALLED SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING
STRUCTURES, SHALL BE ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) INSTALLED
SPACES, DEFINED AS A PARKING SPACE THAT INCLUDES
ACCESS TO AN EV CHARGER, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. EV CAPABLE SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING
STRUCTURES, SHALL BE EV CAPABLE SPACES, DEFINED AS
A PARKING SPACE THAT INCLUDES ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL
WIRING TO ALLOW FOR A FUTURE JUNCTION BOX AND
APPROPRIATE VOLTAGE FOR AN OUTLET CAPABLE OF
CHARGING A VEHICLE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

10. BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE:

A. BUFFERED AND WIDENED BIKE LANES: EXISTING BIKE
LANES SHOULD BE WIDENED AND SHALL BE BUFFERED ON
BOTH SIDES OF MAYO BOULEVARD, AS APPROVED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. ON-SITE BICYCLE CIRCULATION: BIKE LANES, BIKE
BOULEVARDS, OR OTHER DESIGN STANDARDS TO
MAXIMIZE BICYCLIST VISIBILITY, SAFETY AND BICYCLIST
CIRCULATION ON SITE THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED PER THE
RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN
DESIGN GUIDANCE ELEMENT, CHAPTER 3 (BICYCLE
TOOLBOX), OF THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. BICYCLE PARKING: BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED
PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H.6 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, IN ADDITION TO THE
FOLLOWING SECURED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.25
SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT AND GUEST BICYCLE PARKING




Page 246
SPACES FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AT A MINIMUM
RATE OF 0.05 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT. NON-SECURED
BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH
INVERTED U AND ARTISTIC RACKS LOCATED NEAR ALL
BUILDING ENTRANCES, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
BELOW AND OPEN SPACE AREAS, AND INSTALLED PER THE
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE.

1) MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL SHALL PROVIDE SECURED
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM RATE OF
0.25 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT AND GUEST
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM RATE OF
0.05 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT.

2) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL PROVIDE
BICYCLE PARKING LOCATED IN COMMON OPEN
SPACE AREAS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.05 SPACES
PER DWELLING UNIT.

D. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS: BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS
(“FIX IT STATIONS”) SHALL BE PROVIDED, MAINTAINED AND
EVENLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL AND SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO
SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS, SHARED-USE PATHS AND MULTI-
USE TRAILS, SPACED A MINIMUM OF A QUARTER MILE
APART. THE BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS (“FIX IT STATIONS”)
SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AN AREA OF HIGH VISIBILITY AND
SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR MANEUVERING AREAS,
WHERE APPLICABLE. THE REPAIR STATION SHALL INCLUDE,
BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:

1) STANDARD REPAIR TOOLS AFFIXED TO THE STATION.

2) A TIRE GAUGE AND PUMP AFFIXED TO THE BASE OF
THE STATION OR THE GROUND.

3) A BICYCLE REPAIR STAND WHICH ALLOWS PEDALS
AND WHEELS TO SPIN FREELY WHILE MAKING
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BIKE.

E. ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE
REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL INCLUDE
STANDARD ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES, OR STANDARD
ELECTRICAL OUTLETS FOR SECURED BICYCLE PARKING,
FOR ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING CAPABILITIES.




Page 247
11. SHADE STANDARDS:

A. SHADE CALCULATIONS AND SHADE STUDY: SHADE
CALCULATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON THE SUMMER
SOLSTICE AT NOON, AS SHOWN ON A SHADING STUDY TO
BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SOURCE OF SHADE: SHADE SHALL BE FROM A STRUCTURE,
LANDSCAPING AT MATURITY, OR A COMBINATION OF THE
TWO, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

C. PUBLIC SIDEWALKS AND SHARED-USE PATHS: MINIMUM 75%

D. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS: MINIMUM 50%

E. UNCOVERED PARKING AREAS: MINIMUM 25%, SHADED PER
SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.3.A OF THIS CHAPTER.

F. OCCUPIABLE ROOF AREAS: MINIMUM 50%

G. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS AND BICYCLE PARKING SPACES:
MINIMUM 75%

H. BIKE LANES: MINIMUM 50%

I. CORNERS OF TRAFFIC LIGHTS: MINIMUM 75%, TO ALLOW
PEDESTRIANS TO WAIT COMFORTABLY FOR THE SIGNAL TO
CHANGE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ALL SHADE STRUCTURES
WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL REQUIRE A REVOCABLE
PERMIT FOR ENCROACHMENT IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
SHALL COMPLY WITH VISIBILITY TRIANGLES.

12. GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE: EACH PROJECT WITHIN
THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL IMPLEMENT A MINIMUM OF
TWO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE (GI) TECHNIQUES FOR
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, PER THE GREATER PHOENIX
METRO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND LOW IMPACT
DEVELOPMENT DETAILS FOR ALTERNATIVE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT, AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

13. WASTE STATIONS: WASTE STATIONS INCLUDING A LANDFILL
RECEPTACLE AND RECYCLING RECEPTACLE WITH




Page 248
INFORMATIONAL SIGNS INDICATING WHAT TYPE OF WASTE
SHOULD GO IN WHICH RECEPTACLE SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL
BUILDING ENTRANCES/EXITS (EXCEPT FOR EMERGENCY ONLY
EXITS) AND SHALL BE ALLOCATED THROUGHOUT THE SITE IN
COMMON OPEN SPACE ARES AND ALONG SIDEWALKS, SHARED-
USE PATHS AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AT CONVENIENT
LOCATIONS, TYPICALLY WITHIN A QUARTER MILE OF EACH
OTHER. ADDITIONALLY, RECYCLING CONTAINERS SHALL BE
PROVIDED FOR EACH GARBAGE CONTAINER PROVIDED.

14. SIGNAGE: THIS DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS EXEMPTED FROM THE
DESERT RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN IF A SEPARATE
COMPREHNESIVE SIGN PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS
APPROVED.

15. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A LOT ADJACENT TO (WITHIN 100
FEET OF) THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY: IN THE EVENT THAT
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OCCURS NEAR THE LOOP 101
FREEWAY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS SHALL APPLY:

A. INDOOR NOISE LEVELS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL NOT
EXCEED A DECIBEL DAY NIGHTLEVEL (DNL) OF 45 DECIBELS,
AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. A SEALED AND SIGNED ANALYSIS BY AN
ENGINEER LICENSED IN ARIZONA WITH A PROFICIENCY IN
RESIDENTIAL SOUND MITIGATION OR NOISE CONTROL
SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE BUILDING PLANS SUBMITTED
FOR PHOENIX BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CODE
COMPLIANCE REVIEW TO THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEER SHALL NOTE
IN THE ANALYSIS THAT THE BUILDING DESIGN IS CAPABLE
OF ACHIEVING THE REQUIRED NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION.

B. NOISE MITIGATION WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE
NORTH SIDE OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1
ADJACENT TO THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY. THE WALL HEIGHT
SHALL BE DETERMINED THROUGH A NOISE ANALYSIS
PREPARED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.
THE WALL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MINIMUM 8-INCH-
THICK CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS (CMU) OR OF CAST-IN-
PLACE CONCRETE AND CONTAIN NO OPENINGS UNLESS
THEY ARE ABOVE THE MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIRED FOR
ADEQUATE NOISE MITIGATION OR FOR DRAINAGE. NOISE
WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO WRAP AROUND
CORNER LOTS AND AREAS NEAR INTERSECTIONS. WRAP
AROUND WALLS, UPON TURNING A CORNER, SHALL




Page 249
CONTINUE FOR AT LEAST 120 FEET (APPROXIMATELY TWO
LOT WIDTHS), AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. NOISE WALLS SHALL VARY BY A MINIMUM OF FOUR FEET
EVERY 400 LINEAL FEET TO VISUALLY REFLECT A
MEANDERING OR STAGGERED SETBACK, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

D. THE NOISE WALL, SHALL INCORPORATE STONE VENEER,
STONEWORK, OR INTEGRAL COLOR CMU BLOCK, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

E. THE DEVELOPER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT
DISCLOSE TO PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS AND RENTERS
OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT THE EXISTENCE
OF NOISE FROM THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY. THE FORM AND
CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO RECORDATION.

16. MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS, PER THE
REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 4 OF THIS PLAN, AND PER THE
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (PCD), SECTION 636 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, SHALL BE SUBMITTED, AND SHALL
BE UPDATED WITH EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT, AS
APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. IN ADDITION, THE
INITIAL MASTER PLANS SUBMITTED BY THE MASTER DEVELOPER
SHALL ALSO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

A. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF DETACHED SIDEWALKS,
LANDSCAPE WITHIN LANDSCAPE STRIPS, BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AND SHARED-USE PATHS ALONG 56TH STREET,
MAYO BOULEVARD AND 64TH STREET PER SECTION 7 OF
THIS CHAPTER, TO BE INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN
SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRAILS PLAN AND
MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN.

B. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS PER
SECTION 10.C 3.CP/BP.1.I.10.D OF THIS CHAPTER, TO BE
INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN,
BICYCLE AND TRAILS PLAN.

C. A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION PLAN TO
INCLUDE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE




Page 250
CIRCULATION ON SITE THAT ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN AND
BICYCLIST CONVENIENCE, SAFETY AND COMFORT, WITH A
FOCUS ON CONNECTING THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 NORTH OF MAYO
BOULEVARD.

17. ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT:

A. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL STREETS WITHIN
AND ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT WITH PAVING,
CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, STREETLIGHTS,
MEDIAN ISLANDS, LANDSCAPING, AND OTHER INCIDENTALS,
AS PER PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL
COMPLY WITH ALL ADA ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.

B. A RED BORDER LETTER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ADOT) FOR
THIS DEVELOPMENT.

C. THIS PARCEL IS IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA)
CALLED ZONE AO, ON PANEL 1315 L OF THE FLOOD
INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRM) DATED JANUARY 4, 2021.
THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT:

1) THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER IS REQUIRED TO SHOW
THE FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS ON THE
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN AND ENSURE THAT
IMPACTS TO THE PROPOSED FACILITIES HAVE BEEN
CONSIDERED, FOLLOWING THE NATIONAL FLOOD
INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) REGULATIONS (44 CFR
PARAGRAPH 60.3). THIS INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO PROVISIONS IN THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE
FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE OF THE PHOENIX CITY
CODE.

2) A COPY OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL
BE SUBMITTED TO THE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT
SECTION OF THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF
FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS.

3) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON




Page 251
CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO FLOODPLAIN
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS.

4) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND A MINIMUM
95% COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FOR THE BUILDING
PADS TO FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.

5) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
FINISHED CONSTRUCTION TO FLOODPLAIN
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

D. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT
DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE AND OPERATIONAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCOTTSDALE MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT (SDL) TO FUTURE OWNERS OR TENANTS OF THE
PROPERTY. THE FORM AND CONTENT OF SUCH
DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE TEMPLATES
AND INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED WHICH HAVE BEEN
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.

E. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A NO HAZARD
DETERMINATION FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THAT
EXCEEDS 70 FEET IN HEIGHT FROM THE FAA PURSUANT TO
THE FAA’S FORM-7460 OBSTRUCTION ANALYSIS REVIEW
PROCESS, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL,
AS PER PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

F. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX
ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT
PHASE I DATA TESTING AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SURVEY REPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW
AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO
CLEARING AND GRUBBING, LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR
GRADING APPROVAL.

G. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON
REVIEW OF THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA
TESTING, THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION
WITH A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH




Page 252
DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE
APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL
DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.

H. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER
SHALL IMMEDIATELY CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY,
NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND ALLOW TIME FOR
THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY ASSESS THE
MATERIALS.

I. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE
LANDOWNER SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER
OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH
THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

II. CONDITIONS FOR ENHANCED PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS:

DEVELOPMENT WITHIN PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 CAN UTILIZE THE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THIS SUBSECTION ONLY UPON THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BEING APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE
CITY:

1. BEFORE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR
ANY INDIVIDUAL BUILDING, PROJECT OR USE BY THE CITY WITHIN
THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL, A CONCEPTUAL MASTER
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SITE PLAN (CMDPSP) FOR THE ENTIRETY
OF SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE SHALL BE
SUBMITTED FOR CITY APPROVAL. THIS MEANS, FOR EXAMPLE,
THAT BEFORE ANY PLANS FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL BUILDING,
PROJECT OR USE WITHIN PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 ARE PROCESSED
FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY, A CMDPSP FOR THE ENTIRETY OF
SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE MUST BE FILED
WITH THE CITY. THE CITY WILL THEN PROCESS THE CMDPSP
THROUGH A STAFF APPROVAL PROCESS. AT A MINIMUM THE
CMDPSP SHALL PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE
FOLLOWING:

A. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT UNIT BOUNDARIES WITHIN THE
SUPERBLOCK.




Page 253
B. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT UNIT AND THE ENTIRE SUPER
BLOCK AND MAYO CLINIC PUD AREA.

C. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHTS.

D. PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS.

E. LAND USE FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT UNIT.

2. FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT UNITS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL, THE INITIAL APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT CONCEPTUAL
MASTER PLANS FOR THE ENTIRE SUPERBLOCK AND MAYO CLINIC
PUD SITE, AS DESCRIBED IN THE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT
(PCD) SECTION OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, AND AS
FURTHER CLARIFIED IN THIS SECTION. THE INITIAL DEVELOPER
WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL WILL BE REQUIRED TO
IDENTIFY THE REGIONAL ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THE ENTIRE DESERT
RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT AREA WITH ASSIGNMENT
OF CONTRIBUTION FUNDS AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO
EACH DEVELOPMENT UNIT WITHIN SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE MAYO
CLINIC PUD, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO:

A. 64TH STREET CONNECTION TO BELL ROAD.

B. ULTIMATE MAYO BOULEVARD FROM TATUM BOULEVARD TO
66TH STREET.

C. TATUM BOULEVARD FROM PINNACLE PEAK ROAD TO THE
SOUTH SIDE OF THE CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT (CAP)
CANAL BRIDGE.

D. 56TH STREET FROM RANGER DRIVE TO PINNACLE PEAK
ROAD, AND OTHER AFFECTED CORRIDORS.

E. 64TH STREET FROM LOOP 101 FREEWAY TO PINNACLE
PEAK ROAD.

ANY SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT UNITS CREATED WITHIN A
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SEEKING AMENDMENT TO THE OVERALL
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MASTER PLANS, SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO SUBMIT REVISED DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MASTER
PLANS AND OBTAIN CITY APPROVAL TO AMEND, ASSIGN OR
PHASE ANY IMPROVEMENTS ASSIGNED TO THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL.




Page 254
3. A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
CITY FOR THE ENTIRE SUPERBLOCK 3 AND MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE
TO SUPPORT THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLANS
AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. NO PRELIMINARY PLANS WITHIN
A DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNTIL THE
STUDY IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. THE DEVELOPER
SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TIS SUBMISSION TO AND
COORDINATING TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER
PLANS AND IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (ADOT).

4. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE DEVELOPER
SHALL HAVE EXECUTED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER
PLANS AND A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
PHOENIX THAT DETAILS FUNDING OBLIGATIONS AND
COMMITMENTS FOR CODE REQUIRED AND REGIONAL STREET,
WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR EACH
DEVELOPMENT UNIT, AS REQUIRED BY THE APPROVED MASTER
PLANS RELATED TO THAT DEVELOPMENT UNIT.

III. ENHANCED PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

1. ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES: UPON COMPLIANCE OF THE
CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE SECTION ABOVE, IN ADDITION TO THE
BASE PERMITTED USES IN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, THE
FOLLOWING SHALL BE PERMITTED:

A. MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PER R-5 MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT OPTION, SECTION 615 OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE

B. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ATTACHED OR DETACHED,
PER R-3 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPTION, SECTION 613 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE

CA. COMMUNITY RESIDENCE CENTER OR HOME

D. BIOMEDICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH OFFICES AND/OR
LABORATORY

EB. HOSPICE




Page 255
FC. MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND ASSOCIATED DORMITORIES AND
MEDICALLY RELATED EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES

GD. MOBILE FOOD VENDING AS AN ACCESSORY USE, SUBJET
TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:

1) SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS OF SECTION 624.D.87.A
THROUGH M OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE,
AS MODIFIED BELOW

2) NO MORE THAN FIVE (5) MOBILE FOOD VENDING
UNITS AT A TIME

3) TO BE PARKED AND LOCATED ON A DUSTPROOFED,
PAVED SURFACE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

4) SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF MAYO
BOULEVARD, 56TH STREET OR 64TH STREET RIGHTS-
OF-WAY

5) THE USE IS LIMITED TO THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM TO
10:00 PM.

HE. MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES ONLY WITH SUBJECT MATTER
RELATED TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSION

2. INCREASED FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR): .85 0.65 OVERALL LIMIT FOR
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

3. INCREASED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHTS ARE EXCLUSIVE OF (DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL
FACILITIES ON TOP OF BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL
HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHTS SPECIFIED
BELOW TO ACCOUNT FOR THESE MECHANICAL FACILITIES AND
ASSOCIATED SCREENING.

A. 250 FEET LIMITED TO 10% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

B. 70 FEET LIMITED TO 75% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

C. 35 FEET LIMITED TO 15% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.




Page 256
IV. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1

THESE DESIGN GUIDELINES SHALL APPLY TO ALL DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1.

THE FOLLOWING DESIGN GUIDELINES FROM SECTION 507 TAB A OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL BE ELEVATED FROM
CONSIDERATIONS (C) AND PRESUMPTIONS (P) TO REQUIREMENTS (R)
AND (R*):

A. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT.

1. DESERT PRESERVATION.

(1.1) DEVELOPMENT SHALL MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING
HEALTHY SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION (TREES OVER 4-INCH
CALIPER IN DIAMETER) AND CACTI OVER 3 FEET IN ACCORDANCE
WITH CITY NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS (TABLE 1).
IF REMOVAL IS NECESSARY, MATURE TREES AND CACTI SHALL BE
SALVAGED AND UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

PROTECTED NATIVE PLANTS SHALL MEAN CACTI, WHICH ARE 3
FEET, OR GREATER IN HEIGHT AND TREES WHICH ARE 4 INCHES
OR GREATER IN CALIPER OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIES:

TABLE 1. PROTECTED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS

TREES:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA
ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA
BERBERIS HAEMATOCARPA RED BARBERY
CANOTIA HOLOCANTHA CRUCIFIXION THORN
CELTIS PALLIDA HACKBERRY
CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE
CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILL PALO VERDE
CHILOPSIS LINERARIS DESERT WILLOW
JUNIPERUS SPECIES JUNIPER
OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD
POPULUS FREMONTII COTTONWOOD
PROSOPIS SPECIES MESQUITE
QUERCUS SPECIES SCRIB OAK
RHUS OVATA SUGAR SUMAC




Page 257
VAUQUELINEA CALIFORNICA ARIZONA ROSEWOOD
CACTI:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO
FEROCACTUS SPECIES BARREL
FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO
PENICEREUS GREGGII NIGHT-BLOOMING CEREUS

2. GRADING/DRAINAGE.

(2.2) SURFACE, SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHALL BE
DESIGNED TO AVOID HARD LINED CHANNELS. (R)

(2.3) SURFACE SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHALL BE
INTEGRATED WITH THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE DESIGN. (R*)

(2.5) REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ADJACENT TO PERIMETER
STREETS MAY UTILIZE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR RETENTION
PROVIDED:

- A MAXIMUM 50% OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK IS
DEVOTED TO RETENTION.

- THE MAXIMUM DEPTH OF RETENTION WITHIN 20 FEET OF RIGHT-
OF-WAY IS 24 INCHES.

- SIDE SLOPES ARE A MAXIMUM 4:1 (R)

3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) PLANT MATERIALS.

3.1.1 DEVELOPMENT SHALL MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING,
NON-NATIVE HEALTHY PLANTS (TREES 4-INCH CALIPER IN
DIAMETER) OR GREATER) AND CACTI (6 FEET HIGH OR GREATER).
IF REMOVAL IS NECESSARY, MATURE TREES SHALL BE SALVAGED
AND UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

3.1.3 LOW WATER USE PLANTS THAT REFLECT AND ENHANCE THE
IMAGE OF THE SONORAN DESERT SHALL BE USED. (R)

3.1.5 ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE TREATMENT SHALL BE
COMPATIBLE WITH AND RELATE TO ANY ESTABLISHED
DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER IN THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT AREA.
(R*)




Page 258
3.1.9 COORDINATE SITE UTILITY ELEMENTS SUCH AS OVERHEAD
POWER LINES, TRANSFORMERS, METER BOXES, BACKFLOW
PREVENTERS, AND FIRE PROTECTION DEVICES, WITH LANDSCAPE
DESIGN TO EFFECTIVELY DIMINISH THE IMPACT OF SUCH
ELEMENTS ON THE SITE CHARACTER. (R*)

3.1.10 TREES SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE WALKWAYS, AND MULTI-USE TRAILS AND PATHS, TO
PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 50% SHADE AND A MINIMUM CANOPY
CLEARANCE OF 6 FEET 8 INCHES. (R)

3.1.11 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND COMFORT SHALL BE
CONSIDERED WHEN SELECTING TREES AND PLANT MATERIAL.
(R*)

3.1.13 NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT
MATURITY OR 10% OF THE NET LOT AREA, WHICHEVER IS LESS,
SHALL BE PLANTED IN TURF OR HIGH-WATER USE PLANTS.
FUNCTIONAL TURF AREAS SUCH AS IN PARKS, SCHOOLS,
MULTIPLE-FAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY COMMON AREAS,
INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOT, AND GOLF COURSES ARE
EXEMPT. (R)

3.1.14 A MINIMUM 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT MATURITY
(EXCLUDING HARDSCAPE AREAS) SHALL BE TREATED WITH
LIVING VEGETATION INCLUDING GROUNDCOVER, SHRUBS AND
TREES, AS WELL AS INORGANIC MATERIAL AND AN AUTOMATIC
IRRIGATION SYSTEM. (R)

3.1.15 IF ALLOWED BY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, THE PLACEMENT OF RECYCLING CONTAINERS IN A
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK OR REQUIRED LANDSCAPED
ISLAND SHALL NOT RESULT IN THE ELIMINATION OF ANY
REQUIRED TREES. (R)

(3.2) MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE AREAS.

3.2.1 NATIVE SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION SHALL NOT BE
PRUNED OR REMOVED FROM AREAS IDENTIFIED ON APPROVED
PLANS AS PERMANENT UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE UNLESS
DEMONSTRATED TO THE CITY THAT A HEALTH, SAFETY OR
WELFARE ISSUE EXISTS. THIS INCLUDES REMOVAL OF DEAD
TREES OR CACTI. (R)

3.2.3 A PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE




Page 259
INSTALLED TO WATER ALL TREES, CACTI, AND PLANTS INSTALLED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS OR
OTHER DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DOCUMENTS TO MINIMIZE
MAINTENANCE AND WATER CONSUMPTION, AND TO MAXIMIZE
PLANT HEALTH, SURVIVABILITY, AND VIABILITY, UNLESS
OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. (R)

(3.4) ART/WATER ELEMENTS.

3.4.1 WATER FEATURES, INCLUDING FOUNTAINS, SHALL BE SITED
TO ALLOW SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT
PRIMARILY TO ON-SITE AND INCIDENTALLY TO OFF-SITE USERS
AND TO MINIMIZE WATER CONSUMPTION. (R*)

3.4.2 IF THERE IS PUBLIC ART, IT SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
OVERALL DESIGN OF A PROJECT. (R*)

4. OPEN SPACE/AMENITIES.

(4.1) IMPROVED OPEN SPACES, PLAZAS AND COURTYARDS SHALL
BE SHADED A MINIMUM 50% AND FUNCTIONAL IN TERMS OF AREA,
DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND AMENITIES TO PROMOTE SAFE
HUMAN INTERACTION. (R*)

(4.2) USABLE PUBLIC SPACE SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM OF
50% SHADING THROUGH THE USE OF TREES OR STRUCTURES
THAT PROVIDE SHADING, OR A COMBINATION OF THE TWO
UNLESS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES
OR OTHER TECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS. (R)

6. PARKING/CIRCULATION.

(6.1) SURFACE PARKING DESIGN.

6.1.3 PARKING AREAS SHALL BE BUFFERED FROM ADJACENT
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND SCREENED FROM STREETS SO
THAT CARS ARE NOT VISIBLE BELOW THE AVERAGE HEIGHT OF
THE HEADLIGHTS. (R)

6.1.7 SURFACE PARKING DESIGN SHALL UTILIZE SHARED ACCESS
DRIVES WITH ADJACENT, SIMILARLY ZONED PROPERTIES. (R)

6.1.9 EXCESSIVE ASPHALT/HARDSCAPE NOT NEEDED FOR
ADEQUATE VEHICULAR MANEUVERING OR PARKING, STAGING OR
MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL BE MINIMIZED. (R*)




Page 260
(6.2) PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN.

6.2.3 THE PARKING STRUCTURE EXTERIOR SHALL BE FINISHED
WITH ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND DETAILING THAT
WILL CREATE VISUAL INTEREST FOR ADJOINING PROPERTIES. (R*)

6.2.4 LIGHTING WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL PROVIDE
SAFETY AND SECURITY AND BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER BOTH IN TERMS OF ILLUMINATION
AND FIXTURES. (R*)

6.2.10 THERE SHALL BE A CONVENIENT, CLEAR, SAFE AND
EFFICIENT INTERNAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM WITHIN THE PARKING
STRUCTURE FOR BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
INCLUDING APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE AND PLACEMENT OF
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION CORES (ELEVATORS AND STAIRS). (R*)

(6.3) ACCESS/CIRCULATION.

6.3.2 THE SITE PLAN SHALL CLEARLY EXPRESS THE SEPARATION
BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. (R*)

7. WALLS/FENCING.

(7.1) WALLS ADJACENT TO ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS
SHALL HAVE A FINISHED APPEARANCE. UNTEXTURED,
UNFINISHED BLOCK AND REINFORCED, MORTAR-FREE CONCRETE
WALLS SHALL BE AVOIDED. (R*)

(7.2) WALL LENGTHS EXCEEDING 50 FEET ADJACENT TO
ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS SHALL BE ARTICULATED OR
CONTAIN SUBSTANTIAL LANDSCAPING TO BREAK THE
CONTINUOUS WALL SURFACE AND CREATE VARYING SHADING
PATTERNS. (R*)

8. SITE LIGHTING.

(8.1) ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO PREVENT
DIRECT VISIBILITY OF THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTY. (R)

(8.2) LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED WITH CUT-OFF FIXTURES AND
DEFLECTORS TO DIRECT LIGHT DOWNWARD AND LIMIT ON-SITE
LIGHTING LEVELS TO A MAXIMUM OF 1-FOOT CANDLE AT THE
PROPERTY LINE. (R)




Page 261
(8.5) SERVICE AREAS AND OTHER SCREENED AREAS SHALL HAVE
PROPER SECURITY LIGHTING. (R*)

(8.6) LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ILLUMINATION SHALL BE OF
SIMILAR DESIGN AND CHARACTER AS THE PROJECT’S BUILDING
COMPONENTS. (R*)

(8.7) SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE PERSONAL
SAFETY AT BUILDING ENTRANCE/EXITS, AND IN PUBLIC ASSEMBLY
AND PARKING AREAS. (R*)

(8.8) RECOMMENDED LIGHTING LEVELS AND UNIFORMITY RATIOS
ESTABLISHED BY THE ILLUMINATION ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF
NORTH AMERICA (IESNA), AS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE CITY OF
PHOENIX, SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN LIGHTING DESIGN FOR
ON-SITE NON-RESIDENTIAL AND MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. (R*)

B. BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION.

1. PLACEMENT/ORIENTATION.

(1.2) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT
THE ORIENTATION OF SURROUNDING BUILDINGS AND
SURROUNDING STREETS BY MAINTAINING CONTINUITY OF
PEDESTRIAN ROUTES AND PROMOTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR
PEDESTRIAN INTERACTION AT THE STREET LEVEL. (R*)

(1.4) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT
CLIMATIC CONDITIONS BY MINIMIZING HEAT GAIN AND
CONSIDERING THE IMPACT OF SHADE ON ADJACENT LAND USES
AND AREAS. (R*)

(1.5) NATURAL SURVEILLANCE SHALL BE MAXIMIZED IN PROJECT
DESIGN TO ENCOURAGE EASY OBSERVATION OF PEOPLE AND
PROPERTY NEAR ENTRYWAYS, PATHWAYS, PUBLIC SPACES AND
PARKING LOTS. (R*)

(1.6) PROJECTS OR PORTIONS OF PROJECTS IN PUBLIC VIEW
(ADJACENT TO STREETS AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS) SHALL
DEMONSTRATE A GREATER LEVEL OF DESIGN SENSITIVITY AND
DETAIL TO VISUAL IMAGE THAN OTHER DEVELOPMENT. (R*)

2. HEIGHT, BULK, AND AREA.

(2.2) PARAPET WALLS SHALL NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE BUILDING




Page 262
HEIGHT MORE THAN 5 FEET FOR A BUILDING THAT IS 20 FEET OR
LESS IN HEIGHT OR 7 FEET FOR A BUILDING ABOVE 20 FEET IN
HEIGHT UNLESS GREATER HEIGHT IS NEEDED TO SCREEN
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. (R*)

3. ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) ARCHITECTURE AND APPLIED TREATMENTS THAT EXPRESS
CORPORATE IDENTITY SHALL BE TEMPERED TO PROVIDE UNIQUE
STRUCTURES THAT COMPLEMENT AND BLEND WITH THEIR
IMMEDIATE CONTEXT. (R*)

(3.2) PARKING SHADE AND CANOPY STRUCTURES SHALL BE
COMPLEMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE PRIMARY
BUILDINGS AND HAVE MINIMAL VISUAL IMPACT TO THE PUBLIC
STREETSCAPE AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. (R*)

4. ARTICULATION.

(4.1) BUILDING FACADES VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS AND
ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT EXCEED 100 FEET
SHALL CONTAIN ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND
DETAILING SUCH AS TEXTURAL CHANGES, PILASTERS, OFFSETS,
RECESSES, WINDOW FENESTRATION, SHADOW BOXES AND
OVERHEAD/CANOPIES. (R*)

(4.2) THE BUILDING FACADE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A
SENSE OF HUMAN SCALE AT GROUND LEVEL BY PROVIDING A
CLEAR ARCHITECTURAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR
LEVELS AND ALL ADDITIONAL LEVELS. (R*)

(4.3) BUILDING ENTRANCES SHALL BE IDENTIFIABLE AND
DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE FROM A PUBLIC SIDEWALK. (R*)

5. COLORS/MATERIALS.

(5.1) ALL SIDES OF A STRUCTURE SHALL EXHIBIT DESIGN
CONTINUITY AND CONTAIN MULTIPLE EXTERIOR ACCENT
MATERIALS THAT EXHIBIT QUALITY AND DURABILITY. EXAMPLES
INCLUDE MATERIALS SUCH AS BRICK, STONE, COLORED
TEXTURED CONCRETE OR STUCCO. ROOF MATERIALS MAY
INCLUDE TREATED METAL, CONCRETE, AND CLAY TILES,
DECORATIVE WOOD, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS. (R*)

(5.2) MULTIPLE BUILDINGS ON THE SAME SITE SHALL BORROW
AND INCORPORATE (NOT DUPLICATE) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES,




Page 263
MATERIALS, FORMS, FEATURES, COLORS AND COMPATIBLE
ELEMENTS FROM THE SAME SITE. THESE SHALL INCLUDE:
CONTINUATION OF DISTINCTIVE ROOFLINES, COVERED WALKWAY
ALIGNMENTS, CONSISTENT DETAILING OF FINISH, ACCENT
FEATURES ON ALL VISIBLE SIDES OF STRUCTURES, COMPATIBLE
SHAPES, MATERIAL, WALL AND LANDSCAPING TREATMENT. (R*)

(5.3) THE EXTENSIVE USE OF THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL
TREATMENTS AND DETAILS ARE STRONGLY DISCOURAGED AND
SHALL BE LIMITED IN THEIR PROPOSED APPLICATION:

- COLORED PLASTIC OR FIBERGLASS

- SHINY METAL DETAILS OR REFLECTIVE MATERIALS

- UNTEXTURED CONCRETE, UNFINISHED BLOCK, STEEL PANELS,
OR ASPHALT SHINGLES AS A PREDOMINANT EXTERIOR MATERIAL.
(R*)

(5.4) CORPORATE COLORS, ASSOCIATED GRAPHICS, AND HIGHLY
CONTRASTING BANDS OF VIBRANT COLORS ON BUILDINGS AND
ON ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (EXCLUDING SIGNAGE) SHALL BE
USED AS AN ACCENT FEATURE WITH RESTRAINT AS A MINOR
ELEMENT OF THE BUILDING’S EXTERIOR. (R*)

(5.5) PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC
STREETS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 30% OF
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COMPOSED OF ALTERNATIVE BUILDING
MATERIALS SUCH AS GLASS, BRICK, MASONRY, STONE AND
STUCCO. (R*)

6. PUBLIC AMENITIES/ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

(6.1) PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND
GATHERING AREAS SHALL BE SHADED (MINIMUM 50% AT
MATURITY) FOR THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF
PEDESTRIANS AND TO ENCOURAGE USE. (R)

(6.2) OVERHANGS AND CANOPIES SHALL BE INTEGRATED IN THE
BUILDING DESIGN ALONG ALL PEDESTRIAN THOROUGHFARES.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTERS WITH
EXTERIOR PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, CONTINUOUS SHADE
PROTECTED WALKWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED. (R*)

(6.3) THERE SHALL BE CONVENIENT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS BETWEEN BUS STOP/SHELTER AND THE BUILDING




Page 264
ENTRY AND/OR ACTIVITY AREA(S). (R*)

7. SCREENING.

(7.1) SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED AWAY FROM PUBLIC
VIEW. (R*)

(7.3) ALL SCREENING SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE
WITH THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. (R*)

(7.5) ALL NEW OR RELOCATED ELECTRIC LINES 12 KV AND
SMALLER, COMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE TELEVISION AND ALL ON
PREMISE WIRING SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND IN ALL
DEVELOPMENTS WHERE VISIBLE FROM STREETS OR ADJOINING
PROPERTIES. (R*)

V. ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
3.CP/BP.1

THE FOLLOWING ARE ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES APPLICABLE TO
ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, USING
THE SAME IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS PER SECTION 507.C OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE:

1. A MAXIMUM OF 60% OF EXTERIOR BUILDING FACADES SHALL BE
FINISHED WITH STUCCO MATERIAL. (R*)

2. LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE SIDEWALKS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE. (R*)

3. LIGHTING SHOULD BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL MULTI-USE
TRAILS PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE. (P)

4. WHERE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS CROSS A VEHICULAR PATH, THE
PATHWAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DECORATIVE PAVERS,
STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR OTHER PAVEMENT
TREATMENTS, THAT VISUALLY CONTRASTS PARKING AND DRIVE
AISLE SURFACES. (R*)

5. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE DECORATIVE
PAVERS, STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR SIMILAR
ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL. (R*)




Page 265
6. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE ENHANCED
LANDSCAPING ON BOTH SIDES WITHIN MINIMUM 250-SQUARE-
FOOT LANDSCAPE AREAS AND SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM
5-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN, PLANTED WITH A VARIETY OF
AT LEAST THREE PLANT MATERIALS, AND MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS WITH THE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN. (R)

7. TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL SITE
ENTRIES AND EXITS TO SLOW DOWN VEHICULAR SPEEDS AS
THEY APPROACH SIDEWALKS. (R*)

8. INTERIOR WALLS AND PRIVACY FENCING SHALL USE MATERIALS
AND COLORS THAT BLEND WITH THE NATURAL DESERT
ENVIRONMENT. (R*)

9. IF PROVIDED, A COMBINATION OF VIEW WALLS/FENCING AND
PARTIAL VIEW WALLS/FENCING SHALL BE INCORPORATED ALONG
PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO DEDICATED PUBLIC OR PRIVATE
OPEN SPACE AREAS, NATURAL AND/OR IMPROVED
DRAINAGEWAYS OR RECREATIONAL AREAS. (R*)

10. DRAINAGE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO LOOK NATURAL IN
THE DESERT SETTING THROUGH COLOR, TEXTURE,
LANDSCAPING, OR OTHER MEANS. (R*)

11. ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED AT ALL PUBLIC STREET CROSSING LOCATIONS TO
INTERCONNECT THE PEDESTRIAN TRAILS THROUGHOUT THE
ENTIRETY OF THE SITE. (R*)

12. WASTE STATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE A COMPOST RECEPTACLE
WHENEVER POSSIBLE, WITH INFORMATIONAL SIGNS INDICATING
WHAT TYPE OF WASTE SHOULD GO IN WHICH RECEPTACLE. (C)

3.CP/BP.2 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2

Size: 205 231.45 acres
Uses permitted: Permitted uses shall be as indicated in Section 626, Commerce
Park District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
(Supp. dated 4/19/95) (Ref. Appendix A.7), as modified below.

Potential APPLICABLE Zoning to Be Applied: CP/BP as per Section 626 of the
this chapter. This zoning is to be WAS applied upon City Council approval of the




Page 266
1995 major amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan relating to this
superblock.

Special Conditions and Requirements: I. PERMITTED USES AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

1. Commerce Park (BUSINESS PARK OPTION) uses are allowed subject to the
standards described in Section C.4.D of this chapter.

2. The development of uses in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall occur
only in the following sequence:

a. Construction of a hospital structure with a minimum of 125 beds
(hospital defined pursuant to the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Ref.
Appendix A.9), including accessory retail wholly within the hospital
structure.

b. Construction (which may occur simultaneously with the hospital
structure defined above) of other medical facilities as defined in
special condition and requirements 3.a.2 below.

c. After the completion of construction of the hospital structure, as
evidenced by the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
construction will be allowed to commence for any other use allowed
in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

3 1 2. The following is a list of modifications to certain design/development
standards and the list of permitted uses included in Section 626,
Commerce Park (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance which shall apply exclusively to Development Parcel
3.CP/BP.2) PERMITTED USES: PER THE BASE PERMITTED USES OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, INCLUDING REQUIRED
CONDITIONS TO USE THE ENHANCED PERMTTED USES, EXCEPT
AS MODIFIED BELOW:

A. HOSPITAL

B. MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND ASSOCIATED DORMITORIES AND
MEDICAL

C. NURSING HOME

D. DEPENDENT CARE FACILITIES

1) IF FREESTANDING, SUBJECT TO AREA LIMITATIONS
OF SECTION 1.B.




Page 267
E. MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES ONLY WITH SUBJECT MATTER
RELATED TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSION

F. MEDICAL APPLIANCE AND OTHER MEDICALLY RELATED
SALES

a. Additional Permitted Uses/Development Conditions:

1) Hospitals (as defined in Appendix A.9)

2) Medical facilities, including:

a) The provision of diagnostic services, extensive
medical treatment including but not limited to surgical
and other hospital services, as well as continuous
nursing service, and including but not limited to
general medical and surgical hospitals, specialty
hospitals, medical clinics, medical laboratories,
outpatient care facilities, medical schools and
associated dormitories, medically related educational
facilities, medical and associated accessory offices,
pharmacies, and similar uses.

b) Facilities for conducting research in the natural or
physical sciences, or engineering and development
as an extension of investigation with the objective of
creating end products on a contract or fee basis, and
including pilot plant operation.

c) Manufacturing related to medical, pharmaceutical and
biotechnical products or equipment. Manufacturing
shall include the fabrication and assembly of finished
products or sub-assemblies, so long as the primary
use of the property is not the basic processing and
compounding of raw material or food products.

d) The provision of intermediate or long-term nursing
and health related care to individuals, typically
classified as nursing homes.

e) Dwelling providing shelter and services for the elderly
or for disabled persons, which may include meals,
housekeeping, personal care assistance and minor
medical services including intermediate, long term or
extended nursing care for residents.




Page 268
f) Food services for the employees, visitors and patients
of the medical facility

g) Non-freestanding retail uses within a medical
facility/hospital building, are allowed subject to the
following conditions:

(1) The maximum gross leasable area for any one
tenant/user shall be 5,000 square feet.

(2) All retail sales occur only within the walls of the
medical facility/hospital building. The entrance
to a retail sales business shall be from within
the walls of the medical facility/hospital
building. No external signage of any kind shall
be permitted so as to be visible from any public
thoroughfare or adjacent property.

h) Helistops or heliports.

i) Clubs, private or public, qualifying by law as a non-
profit entity.

j) Dependent care facilities, subject to the following
conditions:

(1) If the dependent care facility is a freestanding
structure, it shall be subject to the conditions
for freestanding retail uses as described in
3.a.4 below.

k) Wellness centers/clinics.

l) Museums and galleries only with subject matter
related to the medical profession.

m) Places of worship, only in non-freestanding and
integrated into a hospital or a medical facility building.

n) Places of assembly, only if indoors, non-freestanding
and integrated into a hospital or a medical facility
building.

3) Medical appliance and other medically related sales.




Page 269
4) Freestanding retail uses, are allowed in Development Parcel
3.CP/BP.2 subject to the following conditions:

a) The maximum gross leasable area for any one
tenant/user (other thaNt a restaurant) shall be 5,000
square feet.

b) Freestanding retail uses must be located set back a A
minimum SETBACK of 300 feet from 56th Street, 64th
Street and Avenue K MAYO BOULEVARD. External
signage must not be visible from a public
thoroughfare or adjacent property. (It is intended that
the freestanding retail and restaurant uses in
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 be used primarily by
the employees, patients and visitors of the hospital
and medical facilities. These freestanding retail uses
are not intended to be used by persons not working or
visiting within Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.)

c) The maximum aggregate gross leasable area or OF
freestanding retail uses and freestanding
restaurants/bars/cocktail lounges in Development
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be 50,000 square feet.

5) Accessory uses with hotels/motels: Non-freestanding retail
newsstands, gift shops or other customary services,
restaurants and cocktail lounges are allowed as accessory
uses within hotels and motels, provided that the entrance to
such uses shall be from within the exterior walls of the
building only.

6) Multiple family attached MULTIFAMILY residential dwellings.
A maximum of 300 multiple family dwellings shall be allowed
in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

7) Single-family detached residential, DETACHED dwellings. A
maximum of 20 single-family dwelling shall be allowed in
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

b. Modifications of Permitted Building Heights.

The heights of buildings in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be
governed by the table presented below. The maximum building
heights are exclusive of (do not include) the mechanical facilities on
top of the buildings. Consequently, the total height of the structure




Page 270
may exceed the heights specified below to account for these
mechanical facilities.

2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: PER THE BASE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS FOR ENHANCED DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, EXCEPT AS
MODIFIED BELOW THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF MODIFICATIONS
TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE COMMERCE PARK
(BUSINESS PARK OPTION) ZONING DISTRICT.

A. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:

THE HEIGHTS OF BUILDINGS IN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
3.CP/BP.2 SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE TABLE PRESENTED
BELOW. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS ARE EXCLUSIVE OF
(DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL FACILITIES ON TOP OF
THE BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THE
STRUCTURE MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHTS SPECIFIED BELOW TO
ACCOUNT FOR THESE MECHANICAL FACILITIES AND
ASSOCIATED SCREENING.


Use Maximum Building Height
Hospitals 250 feet

Clinics 250 feet

Hotels/motels 56 feet

Medical facilities, 56 feet
except hospitals/clinics

Office building for non- 40 feet
two stories, not to
exceed medical
facilities

Retail and restaurant 40 feet
uses

Multifamily residential 56 feet

All other uses 40 feet

4. Building Setbacks: Buildings must be setback a minimum of 100 feet and
an average of 125 feet from 56th Street, 64th Street (if applicable) and




Page 271
Avenue K. Buildings must be setback 100 feet from all other streets.
Buildings must be setback 30 feet from all other lot lines. Reach 11
setbacks are governed by Section C.4.D, Design Standards 2.a, of this
chapter.

5 B. Floor Area Ratio: 0.85 overall limit for development parcel.

C. MAXIMUM DENSITY: 300 MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS AND
20 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS.

6 Parking. Off-street parking and loading requirements may be modified by
the Development Service Department when supported by an appropriately
documented study.

7 Signage.: This development parcel may be exempted from the Desert
Ridge Comprehensive Sign Plan if the city approves a separate
comprehensive sign plan for this development parcel.

8. 3. Relationship of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 to balance of Specific Plan. In the event
that Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 is developed with a minimum 125 bed hospital, then
after the completion of such hospital, the THE DEVELOPMENT parcel
shall be treated as a separate and distinct entity within the Desert Ridge
Specific Plan. Specifically, a single development entity may be designated
by the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 at the owners’s discretion to be
responsible to the City of Phoenix for all matters related to the specific
plan, including but not limited to reporting on development progress within
the parcel, applying for major and minor amendments, and acting in the
place of the Master Developer with regard to Parcel 3.CP/BP.2. The
relationship between Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 and the Desert Ridge Master
Developer shall be governed by the CC&R’s, design guidelines, and other
contractual documents that may be entered into by the property owner
and the Master Developer. This specific plan shall continue to control land
uses, design standards within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as described above in
Section C.4.D of this chapter, and the permitted 25 percent increase or
decrease in area of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as described in Chapter 4 of this
specific plan.

4. MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS, PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF
CHAPTER 4 OF THE DESERT RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN AND PER THE
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (PCD), SECTION 636 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, SHALL BE SUBMITTED, AND SHALL
BE UPDATED WITH EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT, AS
APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE INITIAL
MASTER PLANS SUBMITTED BY THE MASTER DEVELOPER SHALL
INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:




Page 272
A. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF DETACHED SIDEWALKS,
LANDSCAPE WITHIN LANDSCAPE STRIPS, BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AND SHARED-USE PATHS ALONG 56TH STREET,
MAYO BOULEVARD AND 64TH STREET PER SECTION 7 OF
THIS CHAPTER, TO BE INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN
SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRAILS PLAN AND
MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN.

B. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS PER
SECTION 10.C 3.CP/BP.2.II.4.D OF THIS CHAPTER, TO BE
INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN,
BICYCLE AND TRAILS PLAN.

C. A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION PLAN TO
INCLUDE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
CIRCULATION ON SITE THAT ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN AND
BICYCLIST CONVENIENCE, SAFETY AND COMFORT, WITH A
FOCUS ON CONNECTING THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 NORTH OF MAYO
BOULEVARD.

9 The development of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as a medically-related commerce
park is intended to occur in an integrated manner over a period of years.
In order to assure that Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 develops in accordance with the
provisions of the 1995 Major Specific Plan Amendment creating this
development parcel, the following regulations are established. In the event
that construction of a hospital structure, as defined in Appendix A.9, has
commenced by December 31, 1996, the commencement and completion
of such construction shall be permitted pursuant to those applicable
provisions of the 1995 Major Specific Plan Amendment in effect as of the
effective date of said amendment, governing permitted and accessory
uses, height of buildings, lot coverage limitations, floor area ratios, and off-
street parking and loading standards (hereinafter, the “current regulation”),
and the development of the balance of Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2
may be completed pursuant to the current regulations subject to the
following conditions:

a. That within 180 days of the adoption of the 1995 Major Specific
Plan Amendment creating this development parcel, the owner of
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall file with the city a conceptual
site plan (the “site plan”), which plan shall describe, at a minimum
and with a reasonable degree of certainty, all of the following:

1) A conceptual layout of this entire development parcel
showing individual development units which shall list the use




Page 273
or uses intended in each individual development unit.

2) The height of the buildings in each individual development
unit.

3) The total square footage of all buildings proposed for Parcel
3.CP/BP.2, together with the proposed allocation of the total
square footage to each individual development unit.

4) The boundaries of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, together with the total
gross land area and net land area of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, as
defined in Section 202 of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance.

5) The required off-street parking facilities indicating the
number of parking spaces provided for each use within each
individual development unit.

6) The location of any proposed loading space or dock within
any individual development unit.

b. All construction and development within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be
in accordance with the site plan, as may be revised from time to
time as set forth in this paragraph 9.

c. Prior to the completion of construction of the hospital structure, the
owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall submit to the city a revised site
plan showing the hospital structure and any changes to the square
footage of buildings. Changes to the square footage shall be limited
to a reallocation of the total square footage of all buildings to
different development units within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, or within an
existing individual development unit, but the total square footage of
buildings in Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as shown on the original site plan
shall not be changed. Following the submittal of the revised site
plan, the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be permitted to
commence and complete construction of another building or
buildings or structure or structures in any one of the individual
development units pursuant to the current regulations, so long as
the commencement of construction of said building(s) or
structure(s) shall occur not later than 7 years from the submittal of
the revised site plan.

Prior to the completion of the second building or structure, and
each building or structure thereafter, the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2
shall submit to the city a revised site plan showing all buildings
completed and any changes to the allocation of the total square




Page 274
footage of buildings between different development units within
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, or within an existing individual development unit.
Following the submittal of each revised site plan, the owner of
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be permitted to commence and complete
construction of the next building or structure, and each building or
structure thereafter, under the current regulations, so long as the
commencement of said construction occurs not later than 7 years
after the submittal of each revised site plan. Construction of each
building or structure within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall follow this
procedure.

d. Whenever the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 submits a site plan to the
city in accordance with this paragraph 9, the owner of Parcel
3.CP/BP.2 shall provide a copy of the submitted site plan to the
Master Developer.

e. If the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 fails to comply with the provisions
of subparagraphs 9.a, 9.b and 9.c above, then future development
of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be governed by the regulations relating to
permitted and accessory uses, height of buildings, lot coverage
limitations, floor area ratios, and off-street parking and loading
standards then in effect.

II. ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
3.CP/BP.2:

1. STREET STANDARDS:

A. MAYO BOULEVARD CROSS SECTION: THE 24-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE MEDIAN ALONG MAYO BOULEVARD MAY BE
REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR WIDENED AND BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT. LANDSCAPE MEDIANS SHALL BE PLANTED TO
THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANARDS PER SECTION
3.CP/BP.2.II.2 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE PATH
EASEMENTS: SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE
PATH EASEMENTS SHALL BE DEDICATED WHERE
NECESSARY TO PERMIT DETACHED SIDEWALKS AND
SHARED-USE PATHS, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
C. MAYO BOULEVARD (SOUTH SIDE): A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-




Page 275
WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF
CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE
SOUTH SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD, EXCEPT WHERE THERE
ARE EXISTING SIDEWALKS, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.2.II.2 OF
THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING
SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

D. 56TH STREET (SOUTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): THE EXISTING
LANDSCAPE STRIP ON THE EAST SIDE OF 56TH STREET
ADJACENT TO THE DETACHED SIDEWALK SHALL BE
REPLENISHED AND PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.2.II.2 OF
THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING
SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

E. MULTI-USE TRAIL CONNECTING TO REACH 11: A 10-FOOT-
WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE) SHALL BE
DEDICATED WITHIN THE EASTERN EDGE OF DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, AND A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-
USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE
EASEMENT TO CONNECT SOUTH TO REACH 11 TRAILS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND
AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

F. LANDSCAPE STRIP REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION: IN AREAS
WHERE DRAINAGE CULVERTS, RIGHT TURN LANES AND BUS
BAYS OCCUR AND LIMIT AVAILABLE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STRIPS OF THIS SECTION MAY BE
REDUCED OR ELIMINATED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORATION DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE SIDEWALKS
AND SHARED USE PATHWAYS MAY BE PROVIDED IN SUCH
AREAS WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT OFFSET.

2. STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLANTING STANDARDS:

A. TREES FOR 10-FOOT-WIDE OR WIDER LANDSCAPE STRIPS:
MINIMUM 3-INCH CALIPER, SINGLE-TRUNK, LARGE CANOPY,
DROUGHT-TOLERANT, SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON
CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

B. TREES FOR 5-FOOT-WIDE, LESS THAN 10-FOOT-WIDE,
LANDSCAPE STRIPS: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER, SINGLE-




Page 276
TRUNK, LARGE CANOPY, DROUGHT-TOLERANT, SHADE
TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS.

C. LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS, ACCENTS
AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS MAINTAINED TO A
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF
75% LIVE COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

D. UTILITY CONFLICTS: WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS EXIST, THE
DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN
SOLUTION CONSISTENT WITH A PEDESTRIAN
ENVIRONMENT.

3. VEHICULAR PARKING: OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WHEN SUPPORTED BY AN
APPROPRIATELY DOCUMENTED STUDY.

A. EV INSTALLED SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING
STRUCTURES, SHALL BE ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) INSTALLED
SPACES, DEFINED AS A PARKING SPACE THAT INCLUDES
ACCESS TO AN EV CHARGER, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. EV CAPABLE SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING
STRUCTURES, SHALL BE EV CAPABLE SPACES, DEFINED AS
A PARKING SPACE THAT INCLUDES ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL
WIRING TO ALLOW FOR A FUTURE JUNCTION BOX AND
APPROPRIATE VOLTAGE FOR AN OUTLET CAPABLE OF
CHARGING A VEHICLE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

4. BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE:

A. BUFFERED AND WIDENED BIKE LANES: EXISTING BIKE
LANES SHOULD BE WIDENED AND SHALL BE BUFFERED ON
BOTH SIDES OF MAYO BOULEVARD, AS APPROVED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. ON-SITE BICYCLE CIRCULATION: BIKE LANES, BIKE
BOULEVARDS, OR OTHER DESIGN STANDARDS TO




Page 277
MAXIMIZE BICYCLIST VISIBILITY, SAFETY AND BICYCLIST
CIRCULATION ON SITE THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED PER THE
RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN
DESIGN GUIDANCE ELEMENT, CHAPTER 3 (BICYCLE
TOOLBOX), OF THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. BICYCLE PARKING: BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED
PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H.6 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, IN ADDITION TO THE
FOLLOWING. NON-SECURED BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE
PROVIDED THROUGH INVERTED U AND ARTISTIC RACKS
LOCATED NEAR ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES, OR AS
OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BELOW, AND INSTALLED PER THE
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE.

1) MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL SHALL PROVIDE SECURED
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM RATE OF
0.25 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT AND GUEST
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM RATE OF
0.05 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT.

2) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL PROVIDE
BICYCLE PARKING LOCATED IN COMMON OPEN
SPACE AREAS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.05 SPACES
PER DWELLING UNIT.

D. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS: BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS
(“FIX IT STATIONS”) SHALL BE PROVIDED, MAINTAINED AND
EVENLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL AND SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO
SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS, SHARED-USE PATHS AND MULTI-
USE TRAILS, SPACED A MINIMUM OF A QUARTER MILE
APART. THE BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS (“FIX IT STATIONS”)
SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AN AREA OF HIGH VISIBILITY AND
SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR MANEUVERING AREAS,
WHERE APPLICABLE. THE REPAIR STATION SHALL INCLUDE,
BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:

1) STANDARD REPAIR TOOLS AFFIXED TO THE STATION.

2) A TIRE GAUGE AND PUMP AFFIXED TO THE BASE OF
THE STATION OR THE GROUND.




Page 278
3) A BICYCLE REPAIR STAND WHICH ALLOWS PEDALS
AND WHEELS TO SPIN FREELY WHILE MAKING
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BIKE.

E. ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE
REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL INCLUDE
STANDARD ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES, OR STANDARD
ELECTRICAL OUTLETS FOR SECURED BICYCLE PARKING,
FOR ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING CAPABILITIES.

5. SIGNAGE: THIS DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS EXEMPTED FROM THE
DESERT RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN IF A SEPARATE
COMPREHNESIVE SIGN PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS
APPROVED.

6. ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT:

A. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL STREETS WITHIN
AND ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT WITH PAVING,
CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, STREETLIGHTS,
MEDIAN ISLANDS, LANDSCAPING, AND OTHER INCIDENTALS,
AS PER PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL
COMPLY WITH ALL ADA ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.

B. THIS PARCEL IS IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA)
CALLED ZONE AO, ON PANEL 1315 L OF THE FLOOD
INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRM) DATED JANUARY 4, 2021.
THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT:

1) THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER IS REQUIRED TO SHOW
THE FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS ON THE
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN AND ENSURE THAT
IMPACTS TO THE PROPOSED FACILITIES HAVE BEEN
CONSIDERED, FOLLOWING THE NATIONAL FLOOD
INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) REGULATIONS (44 CFR
PARAGRAPH 60.3). THIS INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO PROVISIONS IN THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE
FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE OF THE PHOENIX CITY
CODE.

2) A COPY OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL
BE SUBMITTED TO THE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT




Page 279
SECTION OF THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF
FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS.

3) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO FLOODPLAIN
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS.

4) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND A MINIMUM
95% COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FOR THE BUILDING
PADS TO FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.

5) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
FINISHED CONSTRUCTION TO FLOODPLAIN
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

C. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT
DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE AND OPERATIONAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCOTTSDALE MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT (SDL) TO FUTURE OWNERS OR TENANTS OF THE
PROPERTY. THE FORM AND CONTENT OF SUCH
DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE TEMPLATES
AND INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED WHICH HAVE BEEN
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.

D. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A NO HAZARD
DETERMINATION FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THAT
EXCEEDS 70 FEET IN HEIGHT FROM THE FAA PURSUANT TO
THE FAA’S FORM-7460 OBSTRUCTION ANALYSIS REVIEW
PROCESS, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL,
AS PER PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

E. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX
ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT
PHASE I DATA TESTING AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SURVEY REPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW
AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO




Page 280
CLEARING AND GRUBBING, LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR
GRADING APPROVAL.

F. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON
REVIEW OF THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA
TESTING, THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION
WITH A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH
DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE
APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL
DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.

G. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER
SHALL IMMEDIATELY CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY,
NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND ALLOW TIME FOR
THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY ASSESS THE
MATERIALS.

H. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE
LANDOWNER SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER
OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH
THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

3.CP/BP.3 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.3

SIZE: 23.88 ACRES
USES PERMITTED: PERMITTED USES SHALL BE AS INDICATED IN
SECTION 626, COMMERCE PARK DISTRICT (BUSINESS PARK OPTION), OF
THE CITY OF PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, AS MODIFIED BELOW.

APPLICABLE ZONING: CP/BP AS PER SECTION 626 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE AS MODIFIED BELOW AND PER SECTION
C.4.D OF THIS CHAPTER. THIS ZONING WAS APPLIED UPON CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE 1995 MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE DESERT
RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN RELATING TO THIS SUPERBLOCK.

I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS:

1. COMMERCE PARK USES ARE ALLOWED SUBJECT TO THE
STANDARDS DESCRIBED IN SECTION C.4.D OF THIS CHAPTER.

2. ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES/DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS: THE
FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE PERMITTED




Page 281
USES INCLUDED IN SECTION 626, COMMERCE PARK DISTRICT
(BUSINESS PARK OPTION), OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE WHICH SHALL APPLY EXCLUSIVELY TO
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.3:

A. MANUFACTURING RELATED TO MEDICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL
AND BIOTECHNICAL PRODUCTS OR EQUIPMENT.
MANUFACTURING SHALL INCLUDE THE FABRICATION AND
ASSEMBLY OF FINISHED PRODUCTS OR SUB-ASSEMBLIES,
SO LONG AS THE PRIMARY USE OF THE PROPERTY IS NOT
THE BASIC PROCESSING AND COMPOUNDING OF RAW
MATERIALS OR FOOD PRODUCTS.

B. MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

C. RETAIL USES. THE MAXIMUM GROSS LEASABLE AREA FOR
ANY ONE TENANT/USER SHALL BE 5,000 SQUARE FEET. THE
MAXIMUM AGGREGATE GROSS LEASABLE AREA OF RETAIL
USES SHALL BE 50,000 SQUARE FEET.

3. BUILDING SETBACKS: MINIMUM 100 FEET AND AN AVERAGE OF 125
FEET FROM 56TH STREET, 64TH STREET AND MAYO BOULEVARD.
MINIMUM 50 FEET FROM ALL OTHER STREETS. MINIMUM 30 FEET
FROM ALL OTHER LOT LINES.

4. FLOOR AREA RATIO: 0.20 OVERALL LIMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL; INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENTS MAY BE UP TO 0.25.

5. DENSITY: MINIMUM 17.0 DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE.

SUPERBLOCK 3 – OVERALL DESIGN GUIDELINES

THE FOLLOWING DESIGN GUIDELINES FROM SECTION 507 TAB A OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL BE ELEVATED FROM
CONSIDERATIONS (C) AND PRESUMPTIONS (P) TO REQUIREMENTS (R):

A. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT.

1. DESERT PRESERVATION.

(1.1) DEVELOPMENT SHALL MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING
HEALTHY SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION (TREES OVER 4"
CALIPER IN DIAMETER) AND CACTI OVER 3' IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CITY NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS (TABLE 1). IF
REMOVAL IS NECESSARY, MATURE TREES AND CACTI SHALL BE
SALVAGED AND UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)




Page 282
PROTECTED NATIVE PLANTS SHALL MEAN CACTI, WHICH ARE
THREE (3) FEET, OR GREATER IN HEIGHT AND TREES WHICH ARE
FOUR (4) INCHES OR GREATER IN CALIPER OF THE FOLLOWING
SPECIES:

TABLE 1. PROTECTED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS

TREES:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA
ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA
BERBERIS HAEMATOCARPA RED BARBERY
CANOTIA HOLOCANTHA CRUCIFIXION THORN
CELTIS PALLIDA HACKBERRY
CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE
CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILL PALO VERDE
CHILOPSIS LINERARIS DESERT WILLOW
JUNIPERUS SPECIES JUNIPER
OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD
POPULUS FREMONTII COTTONWOOD
PROSOPIS SPECIES MESQUITE
QUERCUS SPECIES SCRIB OAK
RHUS OVATA SUGAR SUMAC
VAUQUELINEA CALIFORNICA ARIZONA ROSEWOOD
CACTI:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO
FEROCACTUS SPECIES BARREL
FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO
PENICEREUS GREGGII NIGHT-BLOOMING CEREUS

2. GRADING/DRAINAGE.

(2.2) SURFACE, SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHALL BE
DESIGNED TO AVOID HARD LINED CHANNELS. (R)

(2.3) SURFACE SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHOULD BE
INTEGRATED WITH THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE DESIGN. (R)

(2.5) REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ADJACENT TO PERIMETER
STREETS MAY UTILIZE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR RETENTION
PROVIDED:




Page 283
- A MAXIMUM 50% OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK IS
DEVOTED TO RETENTION.

- THE MAXIMUM DEPTH OF RETENTION WITHIN 20 FEET OF RIGHT-
OF-WAY IS 24-INCHES.

- SIDE SLOPES ARE A MAXIMUM 4:1 (R)

3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) PLANT MATERIALS.

3.1.1 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF
EXISTING, NON-NATIVE HEALTHY PLANTS (TREES 4" CALIPER IN
DIAMETER) OR GREATER) AND CACTI (6' HIGH OR GREATER). IF
REMOVAL IS NECESSARY, MATURE TREES SHOULD BE SALVAGED
AND UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

3.1.3 LOW WATER USE PLANTS THAT REFLECT AND ENHANCE THE
IMAGE OF THE SONORAN DESERT SHALL BE USED. (R)

3.1.5 ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE TREATMENT SHALL BE
COMPATIBLE WITH AND RELATE TO ANY ESTABLISHED
DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER IN THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT AREA.
(R)

3.1.9 COORDINATE SITE UTILITY ELEMENTS SUCH AS OVERHEAD
POWER LINES, TRANSFORMERS, METER BOXES, BACKFLOW
PREVENTERS, AND FIRE PROTECTION DEVICES, WITH LANDSCAPE
DESIGN TO EFFECTIVELY DIMINISH THE IMPACT OF SUCH
ELEMENTS ON THE SITE CHARACTER. (R)

3.1.10 TREES SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE WALKWAYS, AND MULTI-USE TRAILS AND PATHS, TO
PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 50 PERCENT SHADE AND A MINIMUM
CANOPY CLEARANCE OF SIX FEET EIGHT INCHES. (R)

3.1.11 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND COMFORT SHALL BE
CONSIDERED WHEN SELECTING TREES AND PLANT MATERIAL. (R)

3.1.13 NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT
MATURITY OR 10% OF THE NET LOT AREA, WHICHEVER IS LESS,
SHALL BE PLANTED IN TURF OR HIGH-WATER USE PLANTS.
FUNCTIONAL TURF AREAS SUCH AS IN PARKS, SCHOOLS,
MULTIPLE-FAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY COMMON AREAS,




Page 284
INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOT, AND GOLF COURSES ARE
EXEMPT. (R)

3.1.14 A MINIMUM 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT MATURITY
(EXCLUDING HARDSCAPE AREAS) SHALL BE TREATED WITH
LIVING VEGETATION INCLUDING GROUNDCOVER, SHRUBS AND
TREES, AS WELL AS INORGANIC MATERIAL AND AN AUTOMATIC
IRRIGATION SYSTEM. (R)

3.1.15 IF ALLOWED BY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, THE PLACEMENT OF RECYCLING CONTAINERS IN A
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK OR REQUIRED LANDSCAPED
ISLAND SHALL NOT RESULT IN THE ELIMINATION OF ANY
REQUIRED TREES. (R)

(3.2) MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE AREAS.

3.2.1 NATIVE SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION SHALL NOT BE
PRUNED OR REMOVED FROM AREAS IDENTIFIED ON APPROVED
PLANS AS PERMANENT UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE UNLESS
DEMONSTRATED TO THE CITY THAT A HEALTH, SAFETY OR
WELFARE ISSUE EXISTS. THIS INCLUDES REMOVAL OF DEAD
TREES OR CACTI. (R)

3.2.3 A PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE
INSTALLED TO WATER ALL TREES, CACTI, AND PLANTS INSTALLED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS OR
OTHER DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DOCUMENTS TO MINIMIZE
MAINTENANCE AND WATER CONSUMPTION, AND TO MAXIMIZE
PLANT HEALTH, SURVIVABILITY, AND VIABILITY, UNLESS
OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. (R)

(3.4) ART/WATER ELEMENTS.

3.4.1 WATER FEATURES, INCLUDING FOUNTAINS, SHALL BE SITED
TO ALLOW SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT
PRIMARILY TO ON-SITE AND INCIDENTALLY TO OFF-SITE USERS
AND TO MINIMIZE WATER CONSUMPTION. (R)

3.4.2 IF THERE IS PUBLIC ART, IT SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
OVERALL DESIGN OF A PROJECT. (R)

4. OPEN SPACE/AMENITIES.

(4.1) IMPROVED OPEN SPACES, PLAZAS AND COURTYARDS SHALL




Page 285
BE SHADED A MINIMUM 50 PERCENT AND FUNCTIONAL IN TERMS
OF AREA, DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND AMENITIES TO PROMOTE
SAFE HUMAN INTERACTION. (R)

(4.2) USABLE PUBLIC SPACE SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM OF
50 PERCENT SHADING THROUGH THE USE OF TREES OR
STRUCTURES THAT PROVIDE SHADING, OR A COMBINATION OF
THE TWO UNLESS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SITE VISIBILITY
TRIANGLES OR OTHER TECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS. (R)

6. PARKING/CIRCULATION.

(6.1) SURFACE PARKING DESIGN.

6.1.3 PARKING AREAS SHALL BE BUFFERED FROM ADJACENT
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND SCREENED FROM STREETS SO
THAT CARS ARE NOT VISIBLE BELOW THE AVERAGE HEIGHT OF
THE HEADLIGHTS. (R)

6.1.7 SURFACE PARKING DESIGN SHALL UTILIZE SHARED ACCESS
DRIVES WITH ADJACENT, SIMILARLY ZONED PROPERTIES. (R)

6.1.9 EXCESSIVE ASPHALT/HARDSCAPE NOT NEEDED FOR
ADEQUATE VEHICULAR MANEUVERING OR PARKING, STAGING OR
MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL BE MINIMIZED. (R)

(6.2) PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN.

6.2.3 THE PARKING STRUCTURE EXTERIOR SHALL BE FINISHED
WITH ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND DETAILING THAT
WILL CREATE VISUAL INTEREST FOR ADJOINING PROPERTIES. (R)

6.2.4 LIGHTING WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL PROVIDE
SAFETY AND SECURITY AND BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER BOTH IN TERMS OF ILLUMINATION
AND FIXTURES. (R)

6.2.7 APPROPRIATE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES AND PEDESTRIAN
CROSSING AT EXITS AND ENTRANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL
PARKING STRUCTURES. (R)

6.2.10 THERE SHALL BE A CONVENIENT, CLEAR, SAFE AND
EFFICIENT INTERNAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM WITHIN THE PARKING
STRUCTURE FOR BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
INCLUDING APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE AND PLACEMENT OF
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION CORES (ELEVATORS AND STAIRS). (R)




Page 286
(6.3) ACCESS/CIRCULATION.

6.3.2 THE SITE PLAN SHALL CLEARLY EXPRESS THE SEPARATION
BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. (R)

7. WALLS/FENCING.

(7.1) WALLS ADJACENT TO ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS
SHALL HAVE A FINISHED APPEARANCE. UNTEXTURED,
UNFINISHED BLOCK AND REINFORCED, MORTAR-FREE CONCRETE
WALLS SHALL BE AVOIDED. (R)

(7.2) WALL LENGTHS EXCEEDING 50 FEET ADJACENT TO
ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS SHALL BE ARTICULATED OR
CONTAIN SUBSTANTIAL LANDSCAPING TO BREAK THE
CONTINUOUS WALL SURFACE AND CREATE VARYING SHADING
PATTERNS. (R)

8. SITE LIGHTING.

(8.1) ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO PREVENT
DIRECT VISIBILITY OF THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTY. (R)

(8.2) LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED WITH CUT-OFF FIXTURES AND
DEFLECTORS TO DIRECT LIGHT DOWNWARD AND LIMIT ON-SITE
LIGHTING LEVELS TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE (1) FOOT CANDLE AT
THE PROPERTY LINE. (R)

(8.5) SERVICE AREAS AND OTHER SCREENED AREAS SHALL HAVE
PROPER SECURITY LIGHTING. (R)

(8.6) LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ILLUMINATION SHALL BE OF
SIMILAR DESIGN AND CHARACTER AS THE PROJECT’S BUILDING
COMPONENTS. (R)

(8.7) SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE PERSONAL
SAFETY AT BUILDING ENTRANCE/EXITS, AND IN PUBLIC ASSEMBLY
AND PARKING AREAS. (R)

(8.8) RECOMMENDED LIGHTING LEVELS AND UNIFORMITY RATIOS
ESTABLISHED BY THE ILLUMINATION ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF
NORTH AMERICA (IESNA), AS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE CITY OF
PHOENIX, SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN LIGHTING DESIGN FOR
ON-SITE NON-RESIDENTIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. (R)




Page 287
B. BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION.

1. PLACEMENT/ORIENTATION.

(1.2) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT
THE ORIENTATION OF SURROUNDING BUILDINGS AND
SURROUNDING STREETS BY MAINTAINING CONTINUITY OF
PEDESTRIAN ROUTES AND PROMOTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR
PEDESTRIAN INTERACTION AT THE STREET LEVEL. (R)

(1.4) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT
CLIMATIC CONDITIONS BY MINIMIZING HEAT GAIN AND
CONSIDERING THE IMPACT OF SHADE ON ADJACENT LAND USES
AND AREAS. (R)

(1.5) NATURAL SURVEILLANCE SHALL BE MAXIMIZED IN PROJECT
DESIGN TO ENCOURAGE EASY OBSERVATION OF PEOPLE AND
PROPERTY NEAR ENTRYWAYS, PATHWAYS, PUBLIC SPACES AND
PARKING LOTS. (R)

(1.6) PROJECTS OR PORTIONS OF PROJECTS IN PUBLIC VIEW
(ADJACENT TO STREETS AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS) SHALL
DEMONSTRATE A GREATER LEVEL OF DESIGN SENSITIVITY AND
DETAIL TO VISUAL IMAGE THAN OTHER DEVELOPMENT. (R)

2. HEIGHT, BULK, AND AREA.

(2.2) PARAPET WALLS SHALL NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE BUILDING
HEIGHT MORE THAN FIVE FEET (5') FOR A BUILDING THAT IS
TWENTY FEET (20') OR LESS IN HEIGHT OR SEVEN FEET (7') FOR A
BUILDING ABOVE TWENTY FEET IN HEIGHT UNLESS GREATER
HEIGHT IS NEEDED TO SCREEN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. (R)

3. ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) ARCHITECTURE AND APPLIED TREATMENTS THAT EXPRESS
CORPORATE IDENTITY SHALL BE TEMPERED TO PROVIDE UNIQUE
STRUCTURES THAT COMPLIMENT AND BLEND WITH THEIR
IMMEDIATE CONTEXT. (R)

(3.2) PARKING SHADE AND CANOPY STRUCTURES SHALL BE
COMPLIMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE PRIMARY
BUILDINGS AND HAVE MINIMAL VISUAL IMPACT TO THE PUBLIC
STREETSCAPE AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. (R)




Page 288
4. ARTICULATION.

(4.1) BUILDING FACADES VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS AND
ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT EXCEED 100-FEET
SHALL CONTAIN ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND
DETAILING SUCH AS TEXTURAL CHANGES, PILASTERS, OFFSETS,
RECESSES, WINDOW FENESTRATION, SHADOW BOXES AND
OVERHEAD/CANOPIES. (R)

(4.2) THE BUILDING FACADE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A
SENSE OF HUMAN SCALE AT GROUND LEVEL BY PROVIDING A
CLEAR ARCHITECTURAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR
LEVELS AND ALL ADDITIONAL LEVELS. (R)

(4.3) BUILDING ENTRANCES SHALL BE IDENTIFIABLE AND
DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE FROM A PUBLIC SIDEWALK. (R)

5. COLORS/MATERIALS.

(5.1) ALL SIDES OF A STRUCTURE SHALL EXHIBIT DESIGN
CONTINUITY AND CONTAIN MULTIPLE EXTERIOR ACCENT
MATERIALS THAT EXHIBIT QUALITY AND DURABILITY. EXAMPLES
INCLUDE MATERIALS SUCH AS BRICK, STONE, COLORED
TEXTURED CONCRETE OR STUCCO. ROOF MATERIALS MAY
INCLUDE TREATED METAL, CONCRETE, AND CLAY TILES,
DECORATIVE WOOD, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS. (R)

(5.2) MULTIPLE BUILDINGS ON THE SAME SITE SHALL BORROW
AND INCORPORATE (NOT DUPLICATE) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES,
MATERIALS, FORMS, FEATURES, COLORS AND COMPATIBLE
ELEMENTS FROM THE SAME SITE. THESE SHALL INCLUDE:
CONTINUATION OF DISTINCTIVE ROOFLINES, COVERED WALKWAY
ALIGNMENTS, CONSISTENT DETAILING OF FINISH, ACCENT
FEATURES ON ALL VISIBLE SIDES OF STRUCTURES, COMPATIBLE
SHAPES, MATERIAL, WALL AND LANDSCAPING TREATMENT. (R)

(5.3) THE EXTENSIVE USE OF THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL
TREATMENTS AND DETAILS ARE STRONGLY DISCOURAGED AND
SHALL BE LIMITED IN THEIR PROPOSED APPLICATION:

- COLORED PLASTIC OR FIBERGLASS

- SHINY METAL DETAILS OR REFLECTIVE MATERIALS

- UNTEXTURED CONCRETE, UNFINISHED BLOCK, STEEL PANELS,
OR ASPHALT SHINGLES AS A PREDOMINANT EXTERIOR MATERIAL.




Page 289
(R)

(5.4) CORPORATE COLORS, ASSOCIATED GRAPHICS, AND HIGHLY
CONTRASTING BANDS OF VIBRANT COLORS ON BUILDINGS AND
ON ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (EXCLUDING SIGNAGE) SHALL BE
USED AS AN ACCENT FEATURE WITH RESTRAINT AS A MINOR
ELEMENT OF THE BUILDING’S EXTERIOR. (R)

(5.5) PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC
STREETS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 30% OF
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COMPOSED OF ALTERNATIVE BUILDING
MATERIALS SUCH AS GLASS, BRICK, MASONRY, STONE AND
STUCCO. (R)

6. PUBLIC AMENITIES/ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

(6.1) PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND
GATHERING AREAS SHALL BE SHADED (MINIMUM 50 PERCENT AT
MATURITY) FOR THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF
PEDESTRIANS AND TO ENCOURAGE USE. (R)

(6.2) OVERHANGS AND CANOPIES SHALL BE INTEGRATED IN THE
BUILDING DESIGN ALONG ALL PEDESTRIAN THOROUGHFARES.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTERS WITH
EXTERIOR PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, CONTINUOUS SHADE
PROTECTED WALKWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED. (R)

(6.3) THERE SHALL BE CONVENIENT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS BETWEEN BUS STOP/SHELTER AND THE BUILDING
ENTRY AND/OR ACTIVITY AREA(S). (R)

7. SCREENING.

(7.1) SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED AWAY FROM PUBLIC
VIEW. (R)

(7.3) ALL SCREENING SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE
WITH THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. (R)

(7.5) ALL NEW OR RELOCATED ELECTRIC LINES 12 KV AND
SMALLER, COMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE TELEVISION AND ALL ON
PREMISE WIRING SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND IN ALL
DEVELOPMENTS WHERE VISIBLE FROM STREETS OR ADJOINING
PROPERTIES. (R)

ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES.




Page 290
THE FOLLOWING ARE ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES APPLICABLE TO
ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SUPERBLOCK 3, USING THE SAME
IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS PER SECTION 507.C OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE:

1. A MAXIMUM OF 60% OF EXTERIOR BUILDING FACADES SHALL BE
FINISHED WITH STUCCO MATERIAL. (R)

2. LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE SIDEWALKS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE. (R)

3. LIGHTING SHOULD BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL MULTI-USE
TRAILS PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE. (P)

4. WHERE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS CROSS A VEHICULAR PATH, THE
PATHWAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DECORATIVE PAVERS,
STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR OTHER PAVEMENT
TREATMENTS, THAT VISUALLY CONTRASTS PARKING AND DRIVE
AISLE SURFACES. (R)

5. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE DECORATIVE
PAVERS, STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR SIMILAR
ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL. (R)

6. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE ENHANCED
LANDSCAPING ON BOTH SIDES WITHIN MINIMUM 250-SQUARE-
FOOT LANDSCAPE AREAS AND SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM
5-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN, PLANTED WITH A VARIETY OF
AT LEAST THREE PLANT MATERIALS, AND MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS WITH THE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN. (R)

7. TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL SITE
ENTRIES AND EXITS TO SLOW DOWN VEHICULAR SPEEDS AS
THEY APPROACH SIDEWALKS. (R)

8. INTERIOR WALLS AND PRIVACY FENCING SHALL USE MATERIALS
AND COLORS THAT BLEND WITH THE NATURAL DESERT
ENVIRONMENT. (R)

9. A COMBINATION OF VIEW WALLS/FENCING AND PARTIAL VIEW




Page 291
WALLS/FENCING SHALL BE INCORPORATED ALONG PROPERTY
LINES ADJACENT TO DEDICATED PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE AREAS, NATURAL AND/OR IMPROVED DRAINAGEWAYS OR
RECREATIONAL AREAS. (R)

10. DRAINAGE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO LOOK NATURAL IN
THE DESERT SETTING THROUGH COLOR, TEXTURE,
LANDSCAPING, OR OTHER MEANS. (R)

11. ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED AT ALL PUBLIC STREET CROSSING LOCATIONS TO
INTERCONNECT THE PEDESTRIAN TRAILS THROUGHOUT THE
ENTIRETY OF THE SITE. (R)

12. WASTE STATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE A COMPOST RECEPTACLE
WHENEVER POSSIBLE, WITH INFORMATIONAL SIGNS INDICATING
WHAT TYPE OF WASTE SHOULD GO IN WHICH RECEPTACLE. (P)

***

Amend Appendices A.2 (Plant Lists), Page A-2 as follows:

***

A.2 Plant Lists

The Staff Recommended Plant List was prepared by the City of Phoenix Planning
Department staff with assistance from the staff botanist/horticulturalist in the Water
Conservation and Resources Division of the Water and Wastewater Department. The
list includes a combination of native and introduced plants that are suitable to the
Sonoran Desert. Suitability includes drought tolerance and mature height similar to
Sonoran Desert vegetation. These plants were also selected for their adaptability to the
climatic conditions, lower winter nighttime temperatures and more frequent frosts in
Area C.

A Supplemental Plant List is included which identifies six specific development areas in
the Desert Ridge project. In each of the six development areas, additional plant
materials are listed that can be used to supplement the recommended plant list.
Compliance with the Desert Ridge Plant List and the Supplemental Plant List will be
enforced by the Desert Ridge Review Board. Tall palm trees (i.e., Date Palm, Fan Palm,
Mexican Blue Palm) shall be located only in the Village Core, and resort areas;,
SUPERBLOCK 3 DEVELOPMENT PARCELS, AND parcels 4RH and 5A.

***




Page 292
Amend Appendices A.2 (Plant Lists. Supplemental Plant List), Page A-9 as
follows:

***

SUPERBLOCK 3

PALMS

DATE PALMS

TREES

HERITAGE LIVE OAK
EVERGREEN ELM
RED PUSH PISTACHE

***




Page 293
ATTACHMENT B




*REVISED
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
July 24, 2023

Application: GPA-DSTV-1-23-2

Applicant: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Owner: Arizona State Land Department

Location: Generally located south of the 101 Freeway, east of
56th Street, west of 64th Street, and north of the
Reach 11

Acreage: 417.63 acres

Proposal: Amend the Desert Ridge Specific Plan text for
Development Parcels 3.CP/BP.1 and 3.CP/BP.2 to
facilitate the Mayo Clinic expansion including
integrated clinical practice, education and research,
as well as the creation of a new “Discovery Oasis”
biotech and healthcare corridor.

Desert View Village Planning
Committee Meeting Date: August 1, 2023

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in
Exhibit A

FINDINGS:

1) The proposed amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan will reinforce
Superblock 3 as a future destination for investment within the Loop 101
employment corridor.

2) The proposal updates permitted uses and development standards to allow the
development of a medical campus with enhanced design guidelines.

3) The subject site is appropriate for additional height and floor area, as it is
strategically located near a freeway and undeveloped land, away from single-
family residential uses.




Page 294
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Page 2


BACKGROUND

Desert Ridge is an approximately 5,700-acre master planned community located in
northeast Phoenix generally bounded by the Central Arizona Canal, Pinnacle Peak
Road, 32nd Street, and 64th Street. At its inception, the planning area consisted entirely
of undeveloped land held in trust by the Arizona State Land Department. The Desert
Ridge Specific Plan was approved by the Phoenix City Council in July 1990 and is the
governing land use document for Desert Ridge. Desert Ridge is divided into
Superblocks, each with their own individual land uses and regulations.




Desert Ridge Location Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

This amendment pertains to the entirety of Superblock 3, which encompasses the future
Mayo Clinic medical campus, containing Development Parcels 3.CP/BP.1 and
3.CP/BP.2, generally located south of the 101 Freeway, east of 56th Street, west of
64th Street, and north of the Reach 11. The parcel is owned by the Arizona State Land
Department and is primarily vacant, undeveloped land, except for the existing Mayo
Clinic Hospital and the ASU Health Futures Center. The site is designated as Mixed




Page 295
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Page 3


Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park) on the General Plan Land Use Map and
is located within the Desert Ridge/Kierland Major Employment Center in the General
Plan. The Desert Ridge Specific Plan currently allows development in Superblock 3
pursuant to the Commerce Park (Business Park Option) zoning district with a modified
use list and modified development standards, including a height limit of 56 feet (250 feet
for hospital and clinic uses in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2) and a maximum floor
area ratio of 0.2 for Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1.




Aerial Location Map
Source: Planning and Development Department




Page 296
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Page 4




SITE




General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department




SITE




Major Employment Centers Map
Source: Planning and Development Department




Page 297
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Page 5


The proposal, as shown in the draft language attached as Exhibit A, is to amend the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan by changing the development regulations that apply to
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1, in order to allow the same type of development that is
mostly permitted for Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, in addition to other modifications
and additions to the development regulations for both development parcels, which make
up Superblock 3 of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan. The proposal updates the regulatory
framework for Superblock 3 to promote investment surrounding the existing Mayo Clinic
Hospital, including updates to permitted uses and development standards, and the
addition of new design guidelines, to facilitate cohesive development across the
proposed Mayo Clinic campus.

The updated regulatory framework is split into two sections to accommodate long-term
growth of the campus – “Base Permitted Uses and Development Standards”, which
includes the uses and standards already allowed with the existing zoning entitlements,
and “Enhanced Permitted Uses and Development Standards”, which includes more
intense zoning entitlements that can only be used upon complying with certain
conditions.

The “Base Permitted Uses and Development Standards” section includes uses
permitted in the Commerce Park District (Business Park Option) of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, commercial uses permitted in the Commercial C-1 District – Neighborhood
Retail (Section 622) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, and the manufacturing of
medical, pharmaceutical, and biotechnical products or equipment. The base
development standards include a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.20 overall for the
development parcel and a FAR of 0.25 for individual developments. Additionally, a
maximum building height of 56 feet, exclusive of rooftop mechanical facilities and
associated screening, is permitted. On top of these base development standards,
additional standards were added to enhance the overall development of the campus,
including minimum open space, detached sidewalk standards, shared-use path
standards, a multi-use trail standard, minimum landscape standards, electric vehicle
(EV) parking standards, bicycle infrastructure standards, minimum shade standards,
green stormwater infrastructure standards, and recycling standards. A condition of
approval for use of the base section was also added to clarify that master plans for the
overall campus are required and must be updated with each phase of development.

The “Enhanced Permitted Uses and Development Standards” section mainly includes
uses currently permitted in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, in addition to multifamily
residential uses up to the R-5 Multifamily Residence District standards, single-family
residential up to the R-3 Multifamily Residential District standards, and mobile food
vending as an accessory use. The enhanced development standards include an FAR of
0.85 for the overall development parcel and a maximum building height of 250 feet
(limited to 10 percent of the net area of the development parcel), a maximum building
height of 70 feet (limited to 75 percent of the net area of the development parcel), and a
maximum building height of 35 feet (limited to 15 percent of the net area of the
development parcel). The “Enhanced Permitted Uses and Development Standards”




Page 298
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Page 6


section can only be used if the following conditions are met:
1. Submittal and approval of a conceptual master development parcel site plan for
the overall Mayo Clinic campus with individual development unit boundaries, floor
area ratio calculations for each individual development unit and the entire Mayo
Clinic campus, proposed building heights, proposed dwelling units, and land uses
for each development unit.
2. Submittal and approval of conceptual master plans for the entire area with
regional roadway infrastructure improvements assigned to each development
unit.
3. Submittal and approval of a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prior to any preliminary
site plan approvals for the entire area.
4. Execution of conceptual master plans and a development agreement with details
of funding obligations for regional infrastructure improvements.

The proposal also includes a new section to the Superblock 3 chapter of the Desert
Ridge Specific Plan, titled “Superblock 3 – Overall Design Guidelines”. This section
applies to both development parcels of Superblock 3 to facilitate a cohesive and
enhanced development of the campus. This section includes design guidelines taken
from Section 507 Tab A of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance that were elevated either from
a Consideration (C) or a Presumption (P) to a Requirement (R). Additionally, the
proposal includes other design guidelines that will enhance the overall development of
the campus.

SURROUNDING LAND USES

The area surrounding Superblock 3 is Land Use
primarily a freeway and undeveloped
land. The Loop 101 freeway is
North Loop 101 Freeway
directly north of the site. South of the
subject site is the Reach 11 Recreation area/park
recreation area. East of the site, South
(Reach 11)
across 64th Street, is vacant land.
West of the site, across 56th Street, East (across
Vacant
is also vacant land, in addition to the 64th Street)
American Express Corporate
West (across Vacant and American
Campus.
56th Street) Express Corporate Campus

RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

STRENGTHEN OUR LOCAL ECONOMY

• JOB CREATION (EMPLOYERS); LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support General
Plan Land Use Map and zoning changes that will facilitate the location of
employment generating uses in each of the designated employment




Page 299
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Page 7


centers.

The subject site is located within the Desert Ridge/Kierland Major Employment
Center, as designated by the General Plan. The proposed amendment to the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan will strengthen the employment center by attracting
job-generating uses to the subject site, through adjustments to the permitted
uses and development standards, making the site more attractive for employers.

CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES

• OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Encourage development of
the taller and larger buildings in Areas of Change away from Single-family
and low-rise, multifamily housing.

The subject site is located adjacent to the Loop 101 freeway to the north and the
Reach 11 recreation area to the south. The site is also buffered from residential
uses to the east by vacant land across 56th Street.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS

• CERTAINTY & CHARACTER: LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Locate land uses with
the greatest height and most intense uses within limits based on village
character, land use needs, infrastructure and transportation system
capacity.

The subject site is located within a large area designated as Commercial and
Commerce/Business Park on the General Plan Land Use Map and is within a
designated Major Employment Center. The proposal concentrates higher
intensity commerce park development within this area, in close proximity to
transportation options, and away from residential uses. The area to the west has
been developed with non-residential uses.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS

The Community and Economic Development (CED) Department commented that the
department is very supportive of this request.

The Water Services Department commented that the property has existing water and
sewer mains that can potentially serve the development. In addition, the Water Services
Department commented that capacity is a dynamic condition that can change over time
due to a variety of factors.

The Street Transportation Department (STD) commented that STD and the Planning
and Development Department (PDD) have worked together closely to draft components
of the “Enhanced Permitted Uses and Development Standards” section of the proposed




Page 300
Staff Analysis
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Page 8


amendment language (Attachment A) for the GPA entitlement request, which addresses
initial concerns from STD regarding intensity of the zoning entitlement request and
impact on the regional transportation system without a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) having
been submitted for review at this stage. STD also commented that the subject
superblock was stipulated to infrastructure improvements by the City as part of an
Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) land sale and that any development on the site
will require that the superblock conform to those requirements, or the requirements of a
subsequent development agreement, as approved by the City of Phoenix.

* THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE AVIATION DEPARTMENT REQUESTED THAT THE
DEVELOPER PROVIDE NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE
EXISTENCE AND OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCOTTSDALE
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (SDL) AND PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT FORM 7460
HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE FAA WITH AN FAA RESPONSE OF “NO HAZARD
DETERMINATION”.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY

As of the writing of this staff report, staff has not received any letters in support or
opposition to this amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-23-2, as shown in the recommended text
in Exhibit A. The proposed amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan promotes
economic development in an area that is within close proximity to a freeway and within
a Major Employment Center.

Writer
Adrian Zambrano
July 24, 2023

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Location Map
Aerial Map
A: Proposed Amendment Language (40 pages)




Page 301
PINNACLE PEAK RD


RD
ST RA N
GE
R DR
FREMON DR 44TH

R
T
LOCK D
W OO
O
UG H RIDER R
D PAT
HF
IND
BLACK MOUNTAIN BLVD

WAY ER
DR
O HS
T A
40 TO
AVIAN T R
DE E
CACTUS D R COLLE
NE R VA L
C
LO LE Y
DR
CO
LL
E CT
ROSE GARD O R
EN L
N B
TATUM BLVD 56TH ST 64TH ST
Page 302
52ND ST
w
v 101

BEARDSLEY RD
U TO
MAY
51 O PI
A
£
¤ BL
VD RD


GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Desert Ridge Specific Plan Area

Superblock 3 ( 417.63 a.c.)

3.CP/BP.1 (186.18 a.c.)
32ND ST
3.CP/BP.2 ( 231.45 a.c.)
CHAUNCY LN
Miles 68TH ST

¯ 0 0.5 1 GROVERS AVE


S:\Information Systems\GIS\Projects\Desert Ridge Superblock 3\Desert_Ridge_Superblock_3.mxd
PINNACLE PEAK RD


RD
ST RA N
GE
R DR
FREMON DR 44TH

R
T
LOCK D
W OO
O
UG H RIDER R
D PAT
HF
IND
BLACK MOUNTAIN BLVD

WAY ER
DR
O HS
T A
40 TO
AVIAN T R
DE E
CACTUS D R COLLE
NE R VA L
C
LO LE Y
DR
CO
LL
E CT
ROSE GARD O R
EN L
N B
TATUM BLVD 56TH ST 64TH ST
Page 303
52ND ST
v
w 101

BEARDSLEY RD
U TO
MAY
51 O PI
A
£
¤ BL
VD RD


GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Desert Ridge Specific Plan Area

Superblock 3 ( 417.63 a.c.)

3.CP/BP.1 (186.18 a.c.)
32ND ST
3.CP/BP.2 ( 231.45 a.c.)
CHAUNCY LN
Miles 68TH ST

¯ 0 0.5 1 GROVERS AVE
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
S:\Information Systems\GIS\Projects\Desert Ridge Superblock 3\Desert_Ridge_Superblock_3_Aerial.mxd
EXHIBIT A

GPA-DSTV-1-23-2: Desert Ridge Specific Plan Amendment

Proposed Language:

Amend Chapter 6 (Development Parcel Regulations), Section C.4.D (Non-Core
Parcel Regulations, Modified City of Phoenix Commerce Park/Business Park
Regulations Imposed by Desert Ridge Specific Plan), Pages 6-10 to 6-11 as
follows:

Site Plan Requirement

1. A site plan is required for all CP/BP development parcels.

Design Standards

1. All parcels, EXCEPT AS NOTED.

a. Building Height/Setback Relationship: Height is limited to 18 feet within 30
feet of lot lines, with one additional foot of height for every additional foot of
setback to the otherwise permitted maximum height. DEVELOPMENT
PARCELS IN SUPERBLOCK 3 ARE EXEMPT.

b. Required Parking Lot and Wall Setbacks:

1) Tatum Boulevard, 56th Street, 64th Street and Avenue K MAYO
BOULEVARD (FORMERLY AVENUE K): 50 feet minimum from
street right-of-way.

2) 52nd Street, Pima Freeway and all other streets: 30 feet minimum
from right-of-way, EXCEPT FOR THE PORTION OF PIMA
FREEWAY WHICH ABUTS SUPERBLOCK 3 SHALL BE 10 FEET
MINIMUM FROM RIGHT-OF-WAY.

3) All other lot lines except lot lines which abut Reach 11: Parking lots
must be 10 feet minimum from all lot lines; there is no minimum
setback from lot lines for walls. NO MINIMUM SETBACK FOR
SUPERBLOCK 3 PARCELS.

c. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be required in all street rights-of-way,
building and parking lot setback area, parking areas and open space areas
pursuant to City of Phoenix requirements, except that a minimum of 25% of
the required trees shall be 24-inch box or larger.




Page 304
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

d. Walls and Fences: Walls and fences located within or adjacent to a building
or parking lot setback which is adjacent to Tatum Boulevard, 56th Street,
64th Street, MAYO BOULEVARD (FORMELY AVENUE K), and 52nd
Street shall not exceed eight feet in height. Walls and fences adjacent to all
other streets and interior and perimeter lot lines shall not exceed eight feet
in height.

e. Screening: Loading, service, storage, delivery, refuse collection and parking
area must be screened with landscaping, walls or berming (or combinations
thereof) so as to be non-visible when standing six feet in height on the
boundary lines of adjacent streets and properties. Rooftop treatment shall
screen exposure of pipes and mechanical equipment from view so as to be
non-visible when standing six feet in height on the boundary lines of
adjacent streets and properties. Exhaust stacks are exempt from these
screening requirements.

2. Developments Abutting Reach 11: Reach 11 will be developed as a regional
recreational area with a variety of facilities which will provide active and passive
recreational opportunities. Development adjacent to Reach 11 should be
encouraged to consider the recreational facilities as site amenities that have the
long term potential to enhance adjacent land uses. Where a development abuts
Reach 11, the following standards shall apply:

a. Setbacks and Building Height: Buildings shall be set back an average of
100 feet from the Reach 11 property line. If any portion of a building is over
56 feet in height, the setback for the portion of the building shall be
increased one foot for every one foot of height over 56 feet, up to the
maximum permitted height. The first 60 feet of setback from Reach 11 shall
remain as a buffer of open space with native-plant landscaping. Parking and
walls may be placed with a maximum of 50% of the balance of the setback
area. Any buildings with window treatments, architectural facades/building
designs, landscape designs, etc., which focus on Reach 11 may reduce the
required average setback to 60 feet, as approved by the PLANNING AND
Development Services Department. DEVELOPMENT PARCELS IN
SUPERBLOCK 3 ARE EXEMPT, EXCEPT THAT A MINIMUM 65-FOOT
SETBACK SHALL BE REQUIRED FROM REACH 11 REGARDLESS OF
BUILDING HEIGHT.

b. Fencing: If fencing is used at the perimeter of the property or within the
required setback as permitted in the immediately preceding paragraph, it
should be view fencing or an acceptable substitute as permitted by the
PLANNING AND Development Services Department, and Parks AND
Recreation DEPARTMENT, and Library Department. Chain link fencing is
prohibited, except where used within the interior of the site and only where
it is not visible from the exterior property boundaries, as approved by the
PLANNING AND Development Services Department.




Page 305
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


c. Building Architecture/Screening: All building evaluations ELEVATIONS
shall include a mix of building material, vertical and horizontal elements
around the entire building, and shall maintain a campus continuity. Loading,
service, storage, deliver, refuse collection and parking areas which face
Reach 11 must be screened from view. Rooftop treatment shall screen
exposure of pipes and mechanical equipment form view of Reach 11.
Exhaust stacks are exempt from these screening requirements.

***

Amend Chapter 6 (Development Parcel Regulations), Section C.5. (Development
Regulations by Superblock), Pages 6-18 to 6-24 as follows:

SUPERBLOCK 3

Superblock 3 is located south of the Pima Freeway, between 56th Street, 64th Street and
Reach 11. This superblock is an area designated for medically-related commerce park
economic development efforts. The uses, zoning, and development standards, AND
DESIGN GUIDELINES included in this amendment are specifically intended to address
these issues SUPPORT SUCH USES.

3.CP/BP.1 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1

Size: 210 186.18 acres
Uses Permitted: Permitted uses shall be as indicated in Section 626, Commerce
Park District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
(Supp. dated 4/19/95) (Ref. Appendix A.7), as modified below.

Potential APPLICABLE Zoning to Be Applied: CP/BP as per Section 626 of the
chapter. This zoning is to be WAS applied upon City Council approval of the 1995
Major Amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan relating to this superblock.

Special Conditions and Requirements BASE PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS:

1. Commerce Park uses are allowed subject to the standards described in
Section C.4.D of this chapter.

2. 1. Additional Permitted Uses/Development Conditions: The following is a list
of modifications to the permitted uses included in Section 626, Commerce
Park District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance which shall apply exclusively to Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1:




Page 306
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

a. Manufacturing related to medical, pharmaceutical and biotechnical
products or equipment. Manufacturing shall include the fabrication
and assembly of finished products or sub-assemblies, so long as the
primary use of the property is not the basic processing and
compounding of raw materials or food products.

COMMERCE PARK (BUSINESS PARK OPTION) USES,
SUBJECT TO THE STANDARDS DESCRIBED IN SECTION C.4.D
OF THIS CHAPTER.

b. Multiple family attached residential uses at a minimum density of
17.0 dwelling units per gross acre.

c. B. Retail uses. The maximum gross leasable area for any one
tenant/user shall be 5,000 square feet. The maximum aggregate
gross leasable area of retail uses in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1
shall be 50,000 square feet.
USES PERMITTED PER SECTION 622, COMMERCIAL C-1
DISTRICT, OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBJECT
TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:

1) SUCH USES ARE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 5% OF
THE NET AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

2) OF THE 5% OF THE NET AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL, 50% OF SUCH USES ARE LIMITED TO BEING
INTERNAL TO A BUILDING (NOT STAND-ALONE USES).

3) THE MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR ANY ONE
TENANT OR USER SHALL NOT EXCEED 10,000 SQUARE
FEET.

4) EACH NEW DEVELOPMENT SHALL UPDATE THE MAYO
CLINIC MASTER SITE PLAN TO TRACK THESE
PERCENTAGES.

C. MEDICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOTECHNICAL
PRODUCTS OR EQUIPMENT, MANUFACTURING

3. 2. Building Setbacks: Buildings must be setback a minimum of 100 feet and
an average of 125 feet from 56th Street, 64th Street and Avenue K.
Buildings must be setback 50 feet from all other streets, and the Pima
Freeway. Buildings must be setback 30 feet from all other lot lines.

A. ADJACENT TO MAYO BOULEVARD, 56TH STREET AND 64TH
STREET: MINIMUM 100 FEET, AVERAGE OF 125 FFET




Page 307
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


B. ALL OTHER PUBLIC STREETS: MINIMUM 50 FEET

C. PRIVATE STREETS: MINIMUM 25 FEET

D. INTERIOR LOT LINES: 0 FEET

E. ADJACENT TO REACH 11: PER SECTION C.4.D, DESIGN
STANDARDS 2.A, OF THIS CHAPTER.

4. 3. Floor Area Ratio: .20 overall limit for development parcel; individual
developments may be up to .25.

4. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 56 FEET. MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHTS ARE EXCLUSIVE OF (DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL
FACILITIES ON TOP OF BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL
HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHTS
SPECIFIED BELOW TO ACCOUNT FOR THESE MECHANICAL
FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED SCREENING.

5. LOT COVERAGE: MAXIMUM 50% FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

6. COMMON OPEN SPACE: MINIMUM 10% OF GROSS DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL AREA, ALLOCATED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL AREA.

7. STREET STANDARDS:

A. MAYO BOULEVARD CROSS SECTION: THE 24-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE MEDIAN ALONG MAYO BOULEVARD MAY BE
REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR WIDENED AND BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT. LANDSCAPE MEDIANS SHALL BE PLANTED
TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANARDS PER
SECTION 8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE PATH
EASEMENTS: SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE
PATH EASEMENTS SHALL BE DEDICATED WHERE
NECESSARY TO PERMIT DETACHED SIDEWALKS AND
SHARED-USE PATHS, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.




Page 308
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

C. MAYO BOULEVARD (NORTH SIDE): A DETACHED SIDEWALK
SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE
STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND
SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE NORTH
SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD, PLANTED TO THE
STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 8.D.1
OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING
SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

D. MAYO BOULEVARD (SOUTH SIDE): WITH RESPECT TO
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-
WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF
CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE
SOUTH SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD, EXCEPT WHERE THERE
ARE EXISTING SIDEWALKS, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 8.D.1 OF THIS
CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

E. 56TH STREET (SOUTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): THE EXISTING
LANDSCAPE STRIP ON THE EAST SIDE OF 56TH STREET
ADJACENT TO THE DETACHED SIDEWALK SHALL BE
REPLENISHED AND PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 8.D.1 OF THIS
CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

F. 56TH STREET (NORTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): A MINIMUM 10-
FOOT-WIDE DETACHED SIDEWALK, WHICH MAY BE LOCATED
WITHIN AN EASEMENT, SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-
WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF
CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE
EAST SIDE OF 56TH STREET, PLANTED TO THE
STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 8.D.1
OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING
SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

G. 64TH STREET: A DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A
MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED
BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF 64TH STREET,




Page 309
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
PER SECTION 8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED
WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

H. PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LOCAL STREETS: MINIMUM 5-FOOT-
WIDE DETACHED SIDEWALKS SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 5-
FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIPS LOCATED BETWEEN THE
BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
FOR PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LOCAL STREETS, PLANTED TO
THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION
8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING
SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

I. SHARED-USE PATH ON NORTH SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD:
A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH EASEMENT
(SUPE) SHALL BE DEDICATED AND A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE
SHARED-USE PATH (SUP) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN
THE EASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG
SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED
BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE
SUP MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED
DETACHED SIDEWALK WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IF THE
LANDSCAPE STRIP IS PROVIDED PER SECTION 7.C OF THIS
CHAPTER.

J. SHARED-USE PATH ON WEST SIDE OF 64TH STREET:
SUBJECT TO ANY APPLICABLE ADOT STANDARDS NORTH
OF MAYO BOULEVARD, A 10-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH
EASEMENT (SUPE) SHALL BE DEDICATED AND A MINIMUM
10-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH (SUP) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND AS APPROVED
OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE SUP MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF THE
REQUIRED DETACHED SIDEWALK WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-
WAY IF THE LANDSCAPE STRIP IS PROVIDED PER SECTION
7.G OF THIS CHAPTER.

K. MULTI-USE TRAIL CONNECTING TO REACH 11: A 10-FOOT-
WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE) SHALL BE
DEDICATED WITHIN THE EASTERN EDGE OF DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, AND A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-
USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE




Page 310
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

EASEMENT TO CONNECT SOUTH TO REACH 11 TRAILS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND
AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

L. LANDSCAPE STRIP REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION: IN AREAS
WHERE DRAINAGE CULVERTS, RIGHT TURN LANES AND BUS
BAYS OCCUR AND LIMIT AVAILABLE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STRIPS OF THIS SECTION MAY BE
REDUCED OR ELIMINATED BY THE STREET TRANSPORATION
DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE SIDEWALKS AND SHARED USE
PATHWAYS MAY BE PROVIDED IN SUCH AREAS WITHOUT
SIGNIFICANT OFFSET.

8. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS:

A. MILKWEED OR NATIVE NECTAR SPECIES FOR MONARCH
BUTTERFLIES: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE REQUIRED
SHRUBS SHALL BE A MILKWEED OR OTHER NATIVE NECTAR
SPECIES AND SHALL BE PLANTED IN GROUPS OF THREE OR
MORE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS:

1) ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS AND
REACH 11: 25 FEET

2) ADJACENT TO PIMA FREEWAY: 10 FEET

3) ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
DEVELOPMENT WITH NO SHARED PARKING OR
SHARED DRIVEWAY: 5 FEET

4) ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
DEVELOPMENT WITH SHARED PARKING OR SHARED
DRIVEWAY: 0 FEET

C. PARKING LOT AREAS: MINIMUM 10% OF INTERIOR SURFACE
AREA, EXCLUSIVE OF PERIMTER LANDSCAPING AND ALL
REQUIRED SETBACKS.

D. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE PLANTING STANDARDS:

1) STREETSCAPE:




Page 311
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

A) TREES FOR 10-FOOT-WIDE OR WIDER
LANDSCAPE STRIPS: MINIMUM 3-INCH CALIPER
SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-
TOLERANT SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON
CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

B) TREES FOR 5-FOOT-WIDE, LESS THAN 10-FOOT-
WIDE, LANDSCAPE STRIPS: MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY
DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES PLANTED
20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS.

C) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE
GROUNDCOVERS MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM
OF 75% LIVE COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

D) UTILITY CONFLICTS: WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS
EXIST, THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ON AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN SOLUTION
CONSISTENT WITH A PEDESTRIAN
ENVIRONMENT.

2) LANDSCAPE SETBACKS:

A) TREES FOR 10-FOOT OR WIDER LANDSCAPE
SETBACKS: MINIMUM 50% 2-INCH CALIPER, 25%
3-INCH CALIPER AND 25% 4-INCH CALIPER
LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE
TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN
EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

B) TREES FOR LESS THAN 10-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE SETBACKS: MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR
IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

C) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE
GROUNDCOVERS TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF
50% LIVE COVERAGE AT MATURITY.




Page 312
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

3) UNCOVERED PARKING AREAS:

A) TREES: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES
DISPERSED THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREA
TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM SHADING REQUIREMENTS
PER SECTION 13 OF THIS CHAPTER.

B) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE
GROUNDCOVERS MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM
OF 50% LIVE COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

4) COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RETENTION AREAS:

A) TREES: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES
DISPERSED THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREA
TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM SHADING REQUIREMENTS
PER SECTION 13 OF THIS CHAPTER.

B) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE
GROUNDCOVERS MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM
OF 50% LIVE COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

9. VEHICULAR PARKING: OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WHEN SUPPORTED BY AN
APPROPRIATELY DOCUMENTED STUDY.

A. EV INSTALLED SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING
STRUCTURES, SHALL BE ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV)
INSTALLED SPACES, DEFINED AS A PARKING SPACE THAT
INCLUDES ACCESS TO AN EV CHARGER, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. EV CAPABLE SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING
STRUCTURES, SHALL BE EV CAPABLE SPACES, DEFINED AS
A PARKING SPACE THAT INCLUDES ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL
WIRING TO ALLOW FOR A FUTURE JUNCTION BOX AND
APPROPRIATE VOLTAGE FOR AN OUTLET CAPABLE OF




Page 313
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

CHARGING A VEHICLE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

10. BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE:

A. BUFFERED AND WIDENED BIKE LANES: EXISTING BIKE
LANES SHOULD BE WIDENED AND SHALL BE BUFFERED ON
BOTH SIDES OF MAYO BOULEVARD, AS APPROVED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. ON-SITE BICYCLE CIRCULATION: BIKE LANES, BIKE
BOULEVARDS, OR OTHER DESIGN STANDARDS TO MAXIMIZE
BICYCLIST VISIBILITY, SAFETY AND BICYCLIST CIRCULATION
ON SITE THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL
BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED PER THE
RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN
DESIGN GUIDANCE ELEMENT, CHAPTER 3 (BICYCLE
TOOLBOX), OF THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. BICYCLE PARKING: BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED
PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H.6 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, IN ADDITION TO THE
FOLLOWING. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED
THROUGH INVERTED U AND ARTISTIC RACKS LOCATED
NEAR ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES, OR AS OTHERWISE
SPECIFIED BELOW, AND INSTALLED PER THE
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE.

1) MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL SHALL PROVIDE
SECURED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM
RATE OF 0.25 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT AND
GUEST BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM
RATE OF 0.05 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT.

2) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL PROVIDE
BICYCLE PARKING LOCATED IN IMPROVED OPEN
SPACE AREAS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.05 SPACES
PER DWELLING UNIT.

D. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS: BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS
(“FIX IT STATIONS”) SHALL BE PROVIDED, MAINTAINED AND
EVENLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT




Page 314
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

PARCEL AND SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO
SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS, SHARED-USE PATHS AND MULTI-
USE TRAILS, SPACED A MINIMUM OF A QUARTER MILE
APART. THE BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS (“FIX IT STATIONS”)
SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AN AREA OF HIGH VISIBILITY AND
SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR MANEUVERING AREAS,
WHERE APPLICABLE. THE REPAIR STATION SHALL INCLUDE,
BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:

1) STANDARD REPAIR TOOLS AFFIXED TO THE STATION.

2) A TIRE GAUGE AND PUMP AFFIXED TO THE BASE OF
THE STATION OR THE GROUND.

3) A BICYCLE REPAIR STAND WHICH ALLOWS PEDALS
AND WHEELS TO SPIN FREELY WHILE MAKING
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BIKE.

E. ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE
REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL INCLUDE
STANDARD ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES, OR STANDARD
ELECTRICAL OUTLETS FOR SECURED BICYCLE PARKING,
FOR ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING CAPABILITIES.

11. SHADE STANDARDS:

A. SHADE CALCULATIONS AND SHADE STUDY: SHADE
CALCULATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON THE SUMMER
SOLSTICE AT NOON, AS SHOWN ON A SHADING STUDY TO
BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SOURCE OF SHADE: SHADE SHALL BE FROM A STRUCTURE,
LANDSCAPING AT MATURITY, OR A COMBINATION OF THE
TWO, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

C. PUBLIC SIDEWALKS AND SHARED-USE PATHS: MINIMUM 75%

D. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS: MINIMUM 50%

E. UNCOVERED PARKING AREAS: MINIMUM 25%, SHADED PER
SECTION 8.D.3 OF THIS CHAPTER.

F. OCCUPIABLE ROOF AREAS: MINIMUM 50%




Page 315
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

G. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS AND BICYCLE PARKING
SPACES: MINIMUM 75%

H. BIKE LANES: MINIMUM 50%

I. CORNERS OF TRAFFIC LIGHTS: MINIMUM 75%, TO ALLOW
PEDESTRIANS TO WAIT COMFORTABLY FOR THE SIGNAL TO
CHANGE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ALL SHADE STRUCTURES
WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL REQUIRE A REVOCABLE
PERMIT FOR ENCROACHMENT IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
SHALL COMPLY WITH VISIBILITY TRIANGLES.

12. GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE: EACH PROJECT WITHIN
THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL IMPLEMENT A MINIMUM OF
TWO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE (GI) TECHNIQUES FOR
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, PER THE GREATER PHOENIX
METRO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND LOW IMPACT
DEVELOPMENT DETAILS FOR ALTERNATIVE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT, AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

13. WASTE STATIONS: WASTE STATIONS INCLUDING A LANDFILL
RECEPTACLE AND RECYCLING RECEPTACLE WITH
INFORMATIONAL SIGNS INDICATING WHAT TYPE OF WASTE
SHOULD GO IN WHICH RECEPTACLE SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL
BUILDING ENTRANCES/EXITS (EXCEPT FOR EMERGENCY ONLY
EXITS) AND SHALL BE ALLOCATED THROUGHOUT THE SITE IN
COMMON OPEN SPACE ARES AND ALONG SIDEWALKS, SHARED-
USE PATHS AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AT CONVENIENT
LOCATIONS, TYPICALLY WITHIN A QUARTER MILE OF EACH OTHER.
ADDITIONALLY, RECYCLING CONTAINERS SHALL BE PROVIDED
FOR EACH GARBAGE CONTAINER PROVIDED.

14. SIGNAGE: THIS DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS EXEMPTED FROM THE
DESERT RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN IF A SEPARATE
COMPREHNESIVE SIGN PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS
APPROVED.

15. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A LOT ADJACENT TO (WITHIN 100
FEET OF) THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY: IN THE EVENT THAT
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OCCURS NEAR THE LOOP 101
FREEWAY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS SHALL APPLY:

A. INDOOR NOISE LEVELS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL NOT
EXCEED A DECIBEL DAY NIGHTLEVEL (DNL) OF 45 DECIBELS,




Page 316
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. A SEALED AND SIGNED ANALYSIS BY AN
ENGINEER LICENSED IN ARIZONA WITH A PROFICIENCY IN
RESIDENTIAL SOUND MITIGATION OR NOISE CONTROL
SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE BUILDING PLANS SUBMITTED
FOR PHOENIX BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CODE
COMPLIANCE REVIEW TO THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEER SHALL NOTE
IN THE ANALYSIS THAT THE BUILDING DESIGN IS CAPABLE
OF ACHIEVING THE REQUIRED NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION

B. NOISE MITIGATION WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE
NORTH SIDE OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1
ADJACENT TO THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY. THE WALL HEIGHT
SHALL BE DETERMINED THROUGH A NOISE ANALYSIS
PREPARED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.
THE WALL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MINIMUM 8-INCH-
THICK CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS (CMU) OR OF CAST-IN-
PLACE CONCRETE AND CONTAIN NO OPENINGS UNLESS
THEY ARE ABOVE THE MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIRED FOR
ADEQUATE NOISE MITIGATION OR FOR DRAINAGE. NOISE
WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO WRAP AROUND
CORNER LOTS AND AREAS NEAR INTERSECTIONS. WRAP
AROUND WALLS, UPON TURNING A CORNER, SHALL
CONTINUE FOR AT LEAST 120 FEET (APPROXIMATELY TWO
LOT WIDTHS), AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. NOISE WALLS SHALL VARY BY A MINIMUM OF FOUR FEET
EVERY 400 LINEAL FEET TO VISUALLY REFLECT A
MEANDERING OR STAGGERED SETBACK, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

D. THE NOISE WALL, SHALL INCORPORATE STONE VENEER,
STONEWORK, OR INTEGRAL COLOR CMU BLOCK, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

E. THE DEVELOPER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT
DISCLOSE TO PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS AND RENTERS
OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT THE EXISTENCE
OF NOISE FROM THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY. THE FORM AND
CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO RECORDATION.




Page 317
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

16. MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS, PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF
CHAPTER 4 OF THIS PLAN, AND PER THE PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT (PCD), SECTION 636 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE, SHALL BE SUBMITTED, AND SHALL BE UPDATED
WITH EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT, AS APPROVED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE INITIAL MASTER PLANS
SUBMITTED BY THE MASTER DEVELOPER SHALL INCLUDE THE
FOLLOWING:

A. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF DETACHED SIDEWALKS,
LANDSCAPE WITHIN LANDSCAPE STRIPS, BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AND SHARED-USE PATHS ALONG 56TH STREET,
MAYO BOULEVARD AND 64TH STREET PER SECTION 7 OF
THIS CHAPTER, TO BE INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN
SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRAILS PLAN AND
MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN.

B. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS PER
SECTION 10.C OF THIS CHAPTER, TO BE INCLUDED ON THE
MASTER OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRAILS
PLAN.

C. A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION PLAN TO
INCLUDE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
CIRCULATION ON SITE THAT ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN AND
BICYCLIST CONVENIENCE, SAFETY AND COMFORT, WITH A
FOCUS ON CONNECTING THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 NORTH OF MAYO
BOULEVARD.

17. ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT:

A. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL STREETS WITHIN
AND ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT WITH PAVING, CURB,
GUTTER, SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, STREETLIGHTS, MEDIAN
ISLANDS, LANDSCAPING, AND OTHER INCIDENTALS, AS PER
PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH
ALL ADA ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.

B. A RED BORDER LETTER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ADOT) FOR
THIS DEVELOPMENT.




Page 318
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

C. THIS PARCEL IS IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA)
CALLED ZONE AO, ON PANEL 1315 L OF THE FLOOD
INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRM) DATED JANUARY 4, 2021. THE
FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY, AS APPROVED
BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:

1) THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER IS REQUIRED TO SHOW
THE FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS ON THE
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN AND ENSURE THAT
IMPACTS TO THE PROPOSED FACILITIES HAVE BEEN
CONSIDERED, FOLLOWING THE NATIONAL FLOOD
INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) REGULATIONS (44 CFR
PARAGRAPH 60.3). THIS INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO PROVISIONS IN THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE
FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE OF THE PHOENIX CITY
CODE.

2) A COPY OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL
BE SUBMITTED TO THE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT
SECTION OF THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF
FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS.

3) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO FLOODPLAIN
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS.

4) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND A MINIMUM
95% COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FOR THE BUILDING
PADS TO FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.

5) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
FINISHED CONSTRUCTION TO FLOODPLAIN
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

D. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT
DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE AND OPERATIONAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCOTTSDALE MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT (SDL) TO FUTURE OWNERS OR TENANTS OF THE



Page 319
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

PROPERTY. THE FORM AND CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS
SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE TEMPLATES AND
INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED WHICH HAVE BEEN REVIEWED
AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.

E. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A NO HAZARD
DETERMINATION FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT FROM
THE FAA PURSUANT TO THE FAA’S FORM-7460
OBSTRUCTION ANALYSIS REVIEW PROCESS, PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL, AS PER PLANS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

F. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX
ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT
PHASE I DATA TESTING AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SURVEY REPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW
AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO
CLEARING AND GRUBBING, LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR
GRADING APPROVAL.

G. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON
REVIEW OF THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING,
THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A
QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA
RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE
APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL
DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.

H. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER
SHALL IMMEDIATELY CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY,
NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND ALLOW TIME FOR
THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY ASSESS THE
MATERIALS.

I. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE
LANDOWNER SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER
OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH
THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.




Page 320
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


CONDITIONS FOR ENHANCED PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS:

DEVELOPMENT WITHIN PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 CAN UTILIZE THE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THIS SUBSECTION ONLY UPON THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BEING APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE
CITY:

1. BEFORE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR
ANY INDIVIDUAL BUILDING, PROJECT OR USE BY THE CITY WITHIN
THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL, A CONCEPTUAL MASTER
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SITE PLAN (CMDPSP) FOR THE ENTIRETY OF
SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE SHALL BE
SUBMITTED FOR CITY APPROVAL. THIS MEANS, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT
BEFORE ANY PLANS FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL BUILDING, PROJECT OR
USE WITHIN PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 ARE PROCESSED FOR APPROVAL BY
THE CITY, A CMDPSP FOR THE ENTIRETY OF SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE
MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY. THE CITY WILL
THEN PROCESS THE CMDPSP THROUGH A STAFF APPROVAL
PROCESS. AT A MINIMUM THE CMDPSP SHALL PROVIDE
INFORMATION REGARDING THE FOLLOWING:

A. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT UNIT BOUNDARIES WITHIN THE
SUPERBLOCK.

B. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT UNIT AND THE ENTIRE SUPER
BLOCK AND MAYO CLINIC PUD AREA.

C. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHTS.

D. PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS.

E. LAND USE FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT UNIT.

2. FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT UNITS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL,
THE INITIAL APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLANS
FOR THE ENTIRE SUPERBLOCK AND MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE, AS
DESCRIBED IN THE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (PCD) SECTION
OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, AND AS FURTHER CLARIFIED
IN THIS SECTION. THE INITIAL DEVELOPER WITHIN THE
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL WILL BE REQUIRED TO IDENTIFY THE
REGIONAL ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
NECESSARY TO SERVE THE ENTIRE DESERT RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT AREA WITH ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRIBUTION FUNDS




Page 321
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO EACH DEVELOPMENT UNIT
WITHIN SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE MAYO CLINIC PUD, WHICH SHALL
INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO:

A. 64TH STREET CONNECTION TO BELL ROAD.

B. ULTIMATE MAYO BOULEVARD FROM TATUM BOULEVARD TO
66TH STREET.

C. TATUM BOULEVARD FROM PINNACLE PEAK ROAD TO THE
SOUTH SIDE OF THE CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT (CAP)
CANAL BRIDGE.

D. 56TH STREET FROM RANGER DRIVE TO PINNACLE PEAK
ROAD, AND OTHER AFFECTED CORRIDORS.

E. 64TH STREET FROM LOOP 101 FREEWAY TO PINNACLE PEAK
ROAD.

ANY SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT UNITS CREATED WITHIN A
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SEEKING AMENDMENT TO THE OVERALL
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MASTER PLANS, SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO SUBMIT REVISED DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MASTER
PLANS AND OBTAIN CITY APPROVAL TO AMEND, ASSIGN OR PHASE
ANY IMPROVEMENTS ASSIGNED TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

3. A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY
FOR THE ENTIRE SUPERBLOCK 3 AND MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE TO
SUPPORT THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLANS AS
DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT. NO PRELIMINARY PLANS WITHIN A DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNTIL THE STUDY IS REVIEWED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
TIS SUBMISSION TO AND COORDINATING TRANSPORTATION
INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLANS AND IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ADOT).

4. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE DEVELOPER
SHALL HAVE EXECUTED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER
PLANS AND A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
PHOENIX THAT DETAILS FUNDING OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
FOR CODE REQUIRED AND REGIONAL STREET, WATER, SEWER AND
DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT UNIT, AS




Page 322
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

REQUIRED BY THE APPROVED MASTER PLANS RELATED TO THAT
DEVELOPMENT UNIT.

ENHANCED PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

1. PERMITTED USES: IN ADDITION TO THE BASE PERMITTED USES IN
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE
PERMITTED:

A. MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PER R-5 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPTION,
SECTION 615 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE

B. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ATTACHED OR DETACHED, PER
R-3 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPTION, SECTION 613 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE

C. COMMUNITY RESIDENCE CENTER OR HOME

D. BIOMEDICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH OFFICES AND/OR
LABORATORY

E. HOSPICE

F. MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND ASSOCIATED DORMITORIES AND
MEDICALLY RELATED EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES

G. MOBILE FOOD VENDING AS AN ACCESSORY USE, SUBJECT TO
THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:

1) SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS OF SECTION 624.D.87.A
THROUGH M OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, AS
MODIFIED BELOW

2) NO MORE THAN FIVE (5) MOBILE FOOD VENDING UNITS AT
A TIME

3) TO BE PARKED AND LOCATED ON A DUSTPROOFED,
PAVED SURFACE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

4) SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF MAYO
BOULEVARD, 56TH STREET OR 64TH STREET RIGHTS-OF-
WAY




Page 323
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

5) THE USE IS LIMITED TO THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM TO 10:00
PM.

H. MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES ONLY WITH SUBJECT MATTER
RELATED TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSION

2. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR): .85 OVERALL LIMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL.

3. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS ARE
EXCLUSIVE OF (DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL FACILITIES ON
TOP OF BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THE
STRUCTURE MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHTS SPECIFIED BELOW TO
ACCOUNT FOR THESE MECHANICAL FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED
SCREENING.

A. 250 FEET LIMITED TO 10% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

B. 70 FEET LIMITED TO 75% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

C. 35 FEET LIMITED TO 15% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.


3.CP/BP.2 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2

Size: 205 231.45 acres
Uses permitted: Permitted uses shall be as indicated in Section 626, Commerce
Park District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
(Supp. dated 4/19/95) (Ref. Appendix A.7), as modified below.

Potential APPLICALBE Zoning to Be Applied: CP/BP as per Section 626 of the
chapter. This zoning is to be WAS applied upon City Council approval of the 1995
major amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan relating to this superblock.

Special Conditions and Requirements:

1. Commerce Park uses are allowed subject to the standards described in Section
C.4.D of this chapter.

2. The development of uses in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall occur only
in the following sequence:




Page 324
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

a. Construction of a hospital structure with a minimum of 125 beds
(hospital defined pursuant to the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Ref.
Appendix A.9), including accessory retail wholly within the hospital
structure.

b. Construction (which may occur simultaneously with the hospital
structure defined above) of other medical facilities as defined in
special condition and requirements 3.a.2 below.

c. After the completion of construction of the hospital structure, as
evidenced by the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
construction will be allowed to commence for any other use allowed
in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

3 1. The following is a list of modifications to certain design/development
standards and the list of permitted uses included in Section 626,
Commerce Park (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance which shall apply exclusively to Development Parcel
3.CP/BP.2) PERMITTED USES: PER THE BASE PERMITTED USES
AND ENHANCED PERMITTED USES OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
3.CP/BP.1, INCLUDING REQUIRED CONDITIONS TO USE THE
ENHANCED PERMTTED USES, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW:

A. HOSPITAL

B. MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND ASSOCIATED DORMITORIES AND
MEDICAL

C. NURSING HOME

D. DEPENDENT CARE FACILITIES

1) IF FREESTANDING, SUBJECT TO AREA LIMITATIONS OF
SECTION 1.B.

E. MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES ONLY WITH SUBJECT MATTER
RELATED TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSION

F. MEDICAL APPLIANCE AND OTHER MEDICALLY RELATED
SALES

a. Additional Permitted Uses/Development Conditions:

1) Hospitals (as defined in Appendix A.9)

2) Medical facilities, including



Page 325
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


a) The provision of diagnostic services, extensive medical
treatment including but not limited to surgical and other
hospital services, as well as continuous nursing
service, and including but not limited to general
medical and surgical hospitals, specialty hospitals,
medical clinics, medical laboratories, outpatient care
facilities, medical schools and associated dormitories,
medically related educational facilities, medical and
associated accessory offices, pharmacies, and similar
uses.

b) Facilities for conducting research in the natural or
physical sciences, or engineering and development as
an extension of investigation with the objective of
creating end products on a contract or fee basis, and
including pilot plant operation.

c) Manufacturing related to medical, pharmaceutical and
biotechnical products or equipment. Manufacturing
shall include the fabrication and assembly of finished
products or sub-assemblies, so long as the primary use
of the property is not the basic processing and
compounding of raw material or food products.

d) The provision of intermediate or long term nursing and
health related care to individuals, typically classified as
nursing homes.

e) Dwelling providing shelter and services for the elderly
or for disabled persons, which may include meals,
housekeeping, personal care assistance and minor
medical services including intermediate, long term or
extended nursing care for residents.

f) Food services for the employees, visitors and patients
of the medical facility

g) Non-freestanding retail uses within a medical
facility/hospital building are allowed subject to the
following conditions:

(1) The maximum gross leasable area for any one
tenant/user shall be 5,000 square feet.

(2) All retail sales occur only within the walls of the




Page 326
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

medical facility/hospital building. The entrance
to a retail sales business shall be from within the
walls of the medical facility/hospital building. No
external signage of any kind shall be permitted
so as to be visible from any public thoroughfare
or adjacent property.

h) Helistops or heliports.

i) Clubs, private or public, qualifying by law as a non-
profit entity.

j) Dependent care facilities, subject to the following
conditions:

(1) If the dependent care facility is a freestanding
structure, it shall be subject to the conditions for
freestanding retail uses as described in 3.a.4
below.

k) Wellness centers/clinics.

l) Museums and galleries only with subject matter related
to the medical profession.

m) Places of worship, only in non-freestanding and
integrated into a hospital or a medical facility building.

n) Places of assembly, only if indoors, non-freestanding
and integrated into a hospital or a medical facility
building.

3) Medical appliance and other medically related sales.

4) Freestanding retail uses are allowed in Development Parcel
3.CP/BP.2 subject to the following conditions:

a) The maximum gross leasable area for any one
tenant/user (other that a restaurant) shall be 5,000
square feet.

b) Freestanding retail uses must be located set back a
minimum of 300 feet from 56th Street, 64th Street and
Avenue K. External signage must not be visible from a
public thoroughfare or adjacent property. (It is intended
that the freestanding retail and restaurant uses in




Page 327
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 be used primarily by
the employees, patients and visitors of the hospital and
medical facilities. These freestanding retail uses are
not intended to be used by persons not working or
visiting within Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.)

c) The maximum aggregate gross leasable area or
freestanding retail uses and freestanding
restaurants/bars/cocktail lounges in Development
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be 50,000 square feet.

5) Accessory uses with hotels/motels: Non-freestanding retail
newsstands, gift shops or other customary services,
restaurants and cocktail lounges are allowed as accessory
uses within hotels and motels, provided that the entrance to
such uses shall be from within the exterior walls of the building
only.

6) Multiple family attached residential dwellings. A maximum of
300 multiple family dwellings shall be allowed in Development
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

7) Single-family detached residential dwellings. A maximum of
20 single-family dwelling shall be allowed in Development
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

b. Modifications of Permitted Building Heights.

The heights of buildings in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be
governed by the table presented below. The maximum building
heights are exclusive of (do not include) the mechanical facilities on
top of the buildings. Consequently, the total height of the structure
may exceed the heights specified below to account for these
mechanical facilities.

2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: PER THE BASE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS FOR ENHANCED DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, EXCEPT AS
MODIFIED BELOW.

A. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:

THE HEIGHTS OF BUILDINGS IN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
3.CP/BP.2 SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE TABLE PRESENTED
BELOW. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS ARE EXCLUSIVE OF
(DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL FACILITIES ON TOP OF




Page 328
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

THE BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THE
STRUCTURE MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHTS SPECIFIED BELOW TO
ACCOUNT FOR THESE MECHANICAL FACILITIES AND
ASSOCIATED SCREENING.


Use Maximum Building Height
Hospitals 250 feet

Clinics 250 feet

Hotels/motels 56 feet

Medical facilities, 56 feet
except hospitals/clinics

Office building for non- 40 feet
two stories, not to
exceed medical
facilities

Retail and restaurant 40 feet
uses

Multifamily residential 56 feet

All other uses 40 feet

4. Building Setbacks: Buildings must be setback a minimum of 100 feet and
an average of 125 feet from 56th Street, 64th Street (if applicable) and
Avenue K. Buildings must be setback 100 feet from all other streets.
Buildings must be setback 30 feet from all other lot lines. Reach 11 setbacks
are governed by Section C.4.D, Design Standards 2.a, of this chapter.

5 B. Floor Area Ratio: .85 overall limit for development parcel.

6 Parking. Off-street parking and loading requirements may be modified by
the Development Service Department when supported by an appropriately
documented study.

7 Signage.: This development parcel may be exempted from the Desert
Ridge Comprehensive Sign Plan if the city approves a separate
comprehensive sign plan for this development parcel.

8. 3. Relationship of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 to balance of Specific Plan. In the event
that Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 is developed with a minimum 125 bed hospital, then




Page 329
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

after the completion of such hospital, the THE DEVELOPMENT parcel shall
be treated as a separate and distinct entity within the Desert Ridge Specific
Plan. Specifically, a single development entity may be designated by the
owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 at the owners’s discretion to be responsible to
the City of Phoenix for all matters related to the specific plan, including but
not limited to reporting on development progress within the parcel, applying
for major and minor amendments, and acting in the place of the Master
Developer with regard to Parcel 3.CP/BP.2. The relationship between
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 and the Desert Ridge Master Developer shall be
governed by the CC&R’s, design guidelines, and other contractual
documents that may be entered into by the property owner and the Master
Developer. This specific plan shall continue to control land uses, design
standards within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as described above in Section C.4.D of
this chapter, and the permitted 25 percent increase or decrease in area of
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as described in Chapter 4 of this specific plan.

4. MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS, PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF
CHAPTER 4 OF THE DESERT RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN AND PER THE
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (PCD), SECTION 636 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, SHALL BE SUBMITTED, AND SHALL
BE UPDATED WITH EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT, AS
APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE INITIAL
MASTER PLANS SUBMITTED BY THE MASTER DEVELOPER SHALL
INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

A. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF DETACHED SIDEWALKS,
LANDSCAPE WITHIN LANDSCAPE STRIPS, BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AND SHARED-USE PATHS ALONG 56TH STREET,
MAYO BOULEVARD AND 64TH STREET PER SECTION 7 OF
THIS CHAPTER, TO BE INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN
SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRAILS PLAN AND
MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN.

B. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS PER
SECTION 10.C OF THIS CHAPTER, TO BE INCLUDED ON THE
MASTER OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRAILS
PLAN.

C. A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION PLAN TO
INCLUDE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
CIRCULATION ON SITE THAT ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN AND
BICYCLIST CONVENIENCE, SAFETY AND COMFORT, WITH A
FOCUS ON CONNECTING THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 NORTH OF MAYO
BOULEVARD.




Page 330
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


9 The development of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as a medically-related commerce
park is intended to occur in an integrated manner over a period of years. In
order to assure that Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 develops in accordance with the
provisions of the 1995 Major Specific Plan Amendment creating this
development parcel, the following regulations are established. In the event
that construction of a hospital structure, as defined in Appendix A.9, has
commenced by December 31, 1996, the commencement and completion of
such construction shall be permitted pursuant to those applicable provisions
of the 1995 Major Specific Plan Amendment in effect as of the effective date
of said amendment, governing permitted and accessory uses, height of
buildings, lot coverage limitations, floor area ratios, and off-street parking
and loading standards (hereinafter, the “current regulation”), and the
development of the balance of Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 may be
completed pursuant to the current regulations subject to the following
conditions:

a. That within 180 days of the adoption of the 1995 Major Specific
Plan Amendment creating this development parcel, the owner of
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall file with the city a conceptual
site plan (the “site plan”), which plan shall describe, at a minimum
and with a reasonable degree of certainty, all of the following:

1) A conceptual layout of this entire development parcel
showing individual development units which shall list the use
or uses intended in each individual development unit.

2) The height of the buildings in each individual development
unit.

3) The total square footage of all buildings proposed for Parcel
3.CP/BP.2, together with the proposed allocation of the total
square footage to each individual development unit.

4) The boundaries of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, together with the total
gross land area and net land area of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, as
defined in Section 202 of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance.

5) The required off-street parking facilities indicating the
number of parking spaces provided for each use within each
individual development unit.

6) The location of any proposed loading space or dock within
any individual development unit.




Page 331
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

b. All construction and development within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be
in accordance with the site plan, as may be revised from time to
time as set forth in this paragraph 9.

c. Prior to the completion of construction of the hospital structure, the
owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall submit to the city a revised site
plan showing the hospital structure and any changes to the square
footage of buildings. Changes to the square footage shall be limited
to a reallocation of the total square footage of all buildings to
different development units within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, or within an
existing individual development unit, but the total square footage of
buildings in Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as shown on the original site plan
shall not be changed. Following the submittal of the revised site
plan, the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be permitted to
commence and complete construction of another building or
buildings or structure or structures in any one of the individual
development units pursuant to the current regulations, so long as
the commencement of construction of said building(s) or
structure(s) shall occur not later than 7 years from the submittal of
the revised site plan.

Prior to the completion of the second building or structure, and
each building or structure thereafter, the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2
shall submit to the city a revised site plan showing all buildings
completed and any changes to the allocation of the total square
footage of buildings between different development units within
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, or within an existing individual development unit.
Following the submittal of each revised site plan, the owner of
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be permitted to commence and complete
construction of the next building or structure, and each building or
structure thereafter, under the current regulations, so long as the
commencement of said construction occurs not later than 7 years
after the submittal of each
revised site plan. Construction of each building or structure within
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall follow this procedure.

d. Whenever the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 submits a site plan to the
city in accordance with this paragraph 9, the owner of Parcel
3.CP/BP.2 shall provide a copy of the submitted site plan to the
Master Developer.

e. If the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 fails to comply with the provisions
of subparagraphs 9.a, 9.b and 9.c above, then future development
of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be governed by the regulations relating to
permitted and accessory uses, height of buildings, lot coverage
limitations, floor area ratios, and off-street parking and loading




Page 332
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

standards then in effect.

SUPERBLOCK 3 – OVERALL DESIGN GUIDELINES

THE FOLLOWING DESIGN GUIDELINES FROM SECTION 507 TAB A OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL BE ELEVATED FROM
CONSIDERATIONS (C) AND PRESUMPTIONS (P) TO REQUIREMENTS (R):

A. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT.

1. DESERT PRESERVATION.

(1.1) DEVELOPMENT SHALL MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING
HEALTHY SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION (TREES OVER 4"
CALIPER IN DIAMETER) AND CACTI OVER 3' IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CITY NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS (TABLE 1). IF
REMOVAL IS NECESSARY, MATURE TREES AND CACTI SHALL BE
SALVAGED AND UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

PROTECTED NATIVE PLANTS SHALL MEAN CACTI, WHICH ARE
THREE (3) FEET, OR GREATER IN HEIGHT AND TREES WHICH ARE
FOUR (4) INCHES OR GREATER IN CALIPER OF THE FOLLOWING
SPECIES:


TABLE 1. PROTECTED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS

TREES:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA
ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA
BERBERIS HAEMATOCARPA RED BARBERY
CANOTIA HOLOCANTHA CRUCIFIXION THORN
CELTIS PALLIDA HACKBERRY
CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE
CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILL PALO VERDE
CHILOPSIS LINERARIS DESERT WILLOW
JUNIPERUS SPECIES JUNIPER
OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD
POPULUS FREMONTII COTTONWOOD
PROSOPIS SPECIES MESQUITE
QUERCUS SPECIES SCRIB OAK
RHUS OVATA SUGAR SUMAC




Page 333
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

VAUQUELINEA CALIFORNICA ARIZONA ROSEWOOD
CACTI:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO
FEROCACTUS SPECIES BARREL
FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO
PENICEREUS GREGGII NIGHT-BLOOMING CEREUS

2. GRADING/DRAINAGE.

(2.2) SURFACE, SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHALL BE
DESIGNED TO AVOID HARD LINED CHANNELS. (R)

(2.3) SURFACE SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHOULD BE
INTEGRATED WITH THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE DESIGN. (R)

(2.5) REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ADJACENT TO PERIMETER
STREETS MAY UTILIZE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR RETENTION
PROVIDED:

- A MAXIMUM 50% OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK IS
DEVOTED TO RETENTION.

- THE MAXIMUM DEPTH OF RETENTION WITHIN 20 FEET OF RIGHT-
OF-WAY IS 24-INCHES.

- SIDE SLOPES ARE A MAXIMUM 4:1 (R)

3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) PLANT MATERIALS.

3.1.1 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF
EXISTING, NON-NATIVE HEALTHY PLANTS (TREES 4" CALIPER IN
DIAMETER) OR GREATER) AND CACTI (6' HIGH OR GREATER). IF
REMOVAL IS NECESSARY, MATURE TREES SHOULD BE SALVAGED
AND UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

3.1.3 LOW WATER USE PLANTS THAT REFLECT AND ENHANCE THE
IMAGE OF THE SONORAN DESERT SHALL BE USED. (R)

3.1.5 ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE TREATMENT SHALL BE
COMPATIBLE WITH AND RELATE TO ANY ESTABLISHED
DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER IN THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT AREA.
(R)




Page 334
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


3.1.9 COORDINATE SITE UTILITY ELEMENTS SUCH AS OVERHEAD
POWER LINES, TRANSFORMERS, METER BOXES, BACKFLOW
PREVENTERS, AND FIRE PROTECTION DEVICES, WITH LANDSCAPE
DESIGN TO EFFECTIVELY DIMINISH THE IMPACT OF SUCH
ELEMENTS ON THE SITE CHARACTER. (R)

3.1.10 TREES SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE WALKWAYS, AND MULTI-USE TRAILS AND PATHS, TO
PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 50 PERCENT SHADE AND A MINIMUM
CANOPY CLEARANCE OF SIX FEET EIGHT INCHES. (R)

3.1.11 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND COMFORT SHALL BE
CONSIDERED WHEN SELECTING TREES AND PLANT MATERIAL. (R)

3.1.13 NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT
MATURITY OR 10% OF THE NET LOT AREA, WHICHEVER IS LESS,
SHALL BE PLANTED IN TURF OR HIGH-WATER USE PLANTS.
FUNCTIONAL TURF AREAS SUCH AS IN PARKS, SCHOOLS,
MULTIPLE-FAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY COMMON AREAS,
INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOT, AND GOLF COURSES ARE
EXEMPT. (R)

3.1.14 A MINIMUM 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT MATURITY
(EXCLUDING HARDSCAPE AREAS) SHALL BE TREATED WITH
LIVING VEGETATION INCLUDING GROUNDCOVER, SHRUBS AND
TREES, AS WELL AS INORGANIC MATERIAL AND AN AUTOMATIC
IRRIGATION SYSTEM. (R)

3.1.15 IF ALLOWED BY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, THE PLACEMENT OF RECYCLING CONTAINERS IN A
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK OR REQUIRED LANDSCAPED
ISLAND SHALL NOT RESULT IN THE ELIMINATION OF ANY
REQUIRED TREES. (R)

(3.2) MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE AREAS.

3.2.1 NATIVE SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION SHALL NOT BE
PRUNED OR REMOVED FROM AREAS IDENTIFIED ON APPROVED
PLANS AS PERMANENT UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE UNLESS
DEMONSTRATED TO THE CITY THAT A HEALTH, SAFETY OR
WELFARE ISSUE EXISTS. THIS INCLUDES REMOVAL OF DEAD
TREES OR CACTI. (R)

3.2.3 A PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE
INSTALLED TO WATER ALL TREES, CACTI, AND PLANTS INSTALLED




Page 335
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS OR
OTHER DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DOCUMENTS TO MINIMIZE
MAINTENANCE AND WATER CONSUMPTION, AND TO MAXIMIZE
PLANT HEALTH, SURVIVABILITY, AND VIABILITY, UNLESS
OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. (R)

(3.4) ART/WATER ELEMENTS.

3.4.1 WATER FEATURES, INCLUDING FOUNTAINS, SHALL BE SITED
TO ALLOW SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT
PRIMARILY TO ON-SITE AND INCIDENTALLY TO OFF-SITE USERS
AND TO MINIMIZE WATER CONSUMPTION. (R)

3.4.2 IF THERE IS PUBLIC ART, IT SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
OVERALL DESIGN OF A PROJECT. (R)

4. OPEN SPACE/AMENITIES.

(4.1) IMPROVED OPEN SPACES, PLAZAS AND COURTYARDS SHALL
BE SHADED A MINIMUM 50 PERCENT AND FUNCTIONAL IN TERMS
OF AREA, DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND AMENITIES TO PROMOTE
SAFE HUMAN INTERACTION. (R)

(4.2) USABLE PUBLIC SPACE SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM OF
50 PERCENT SHADING THROUGH THE USE OF TREES OR
STRUCTURES THAT PROVIDE SHADING, OR A COMBINATION OF
THE TWO UNLESS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SITE VISIBILITY
TRIANGLES OR OTHER TECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS. (R)

6. PARKING/CIRCULATION.

(6.1) SURFACE PARKING DESIGN.

6.1.3 PARKING AREAS SHALL BE BUFFERED FROM ADJACENT
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND SCREENED FROM STREETS SO
THAT CARS ARE NOT VISIBLE BELOW THE AVERAGE HEIGHT OF
THE HEADLIGHTS. (R)

6.1.7 SURFACE PARKING DESIGN SHALL UTILIZE SHARED ACCESS
DRIVES WITH ADJACENT, SIMILARLY ZONED PROPERTIES. (R)

6.1.9 EXCESSIVE ASPHALT/HARDSCAPE NOT NEEDED FOR
ADEQUATE VEHICULAR MANEUVERING OR PARKING, STAGING OR
MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL BE MINIMIZED. (R)




Page 336
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

(6.2) PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN.

6.2.3 THE PARKING STRUCTURE EXTERIOR SHALL BE FINISHED
WITH ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND DETAILING THAT
WILL CREATE VISUAL INTEREST FOR ADJOINING PROPERTIES. (R)

6.2.4 LIGHTING WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL PROVIDE
SAFETY AND SECURITY AND BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER BOTH IN TERMS OF ILLUMINATION
AND FIXTURES. (R)

6.2.7 APPROPRIATE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES AND PEDESTRIAN
CROSSING AT EXITS AND ENTRANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL
PARKING STRUCTURES. (R)

6.2.10 THERE SHALL BE A CONVENIENT, CLEAR, SAFE AND
EFFICIENT INTERNAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM WITHIN THE PARKING
STRUCTURE FOR BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
INCLUDING APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE AND PLACEMENT OF
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION CORES (ELEVATORS AND STAIRS). (R)

(6.3) ACCESS/CIRCULATION.

6.3.2 THE SITE PLAN SHALL CLEARLY EXPRESS THE SEPARATION
BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. (R)

7. WALLS/FENCING.

(7.1) WALLS ADJACENT TO ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS
SHALL HAVE A FINISHED APPEARANCE. UNTEXTURED,
UNFINISHED BLOCK AND REINFORCED, MORTAR-FREE CONCRETE
WALLS SHALL BE AVOIDED. (R)

(7.2) WALL LENGTHS EXCEEDING 50 FEET ADJACENT TO
ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS SHALL BE ARTICULATED OR
CONTAIN SUBSTANTIAL LANDSCAPING TO BREAK THE
CONTINUOUS WALL SURFACE AND CREATE VARYING SHADING
PATTERNS. (R)

8. SITE LIGHTING.

(8.1) ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO PREVENT
DIRECT VISIBILITY OF THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTY. (R)

(8.2) LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED WITH CUT-OFF FIXTURES AND




Page 337
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

DEFLECTORS TO DIRECT LIGHT DOWNWARD AND LIMIT ON-SITE
LIGHTING LEVELS TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE (1) FOOT CANDLE AT
THE PROPERTY LINE. (R)

(8.5) SERVICE AREAS AND OTHER SCREENED AREAS SHALL HAVE
PROPER SECURITY LIGHTING. (R)

(8.6) LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ILLUMINATION SHALL BE OF
SIMILAR DESIGN AND CHARACTER AS THE PROJECT’S BUILDING
COMPONENTS. (R)

(8.7) SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE PERSONAL
SAFETY AT BUILDING ENTRANCE/EXITS, AND IN PUBLIC
ASSEMBLY AND PARKING AREAS. (R)

(8.8) RECOMMENDED LIGHTING LEVELS AND UNIFORMITY RATIOS
ESTABLISHED BY THE ILLUMINATION ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF
NORTH AMERICA (IESNA), AS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE CITY OF
PHOENIX, SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN LIGHTING DESIGN FOR ON-
SITE NON-RESIDENTIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. (R)

B. BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION.

1. PLACEMENT/ORIENTATION.

(1.2) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT
THE ORIENTATION OF SURROUNDING BUILDINGS AND
SURROUNDING STREETS BY MAINTAINING CONTINUITY OF
PEDESTRIAN ROUTES AND PROMOTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR
PEDESTRIAN INTERACTION AT THE STREET LEVEL. (R)

(1.4) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT
CLIMATIC CONDITIONS BY MINIMIZING HEAT GAIN AND
CONSIDERING THE IMPACT OF SHADE ON ADJACENT LAND USES
AND AREAS. (R)

(1.5) NATURAL SURVEILLANCE SHALL BE MAXIMIZED IN PROJECT
DESIGN TO ENCOURAGE EASY OBSERVATION OF PEOPLE AND
PROPERTY NEAR ENTRYWAYS, PATHWAYS, PUBLIC SPACES AND
PARKING LOTS. (R)

(1.6) PROJECTS OR PORTIONS OF PROJECTS IN PUBLIC VIEW
(ADJACENT TO STREETS AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS) SHALL
DEMONSTRATE A GREATER LEVEL OF DESIGN SENSITIVITY AND
DETAIL TO VISUAL IMAGE THAN OTHER DEVELOPMENT. (R)




Page 338
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

2. HEIGHT, BULK, AND AREA.

(2.2) PARAPET WALLS SHALL NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE
BUILDING HEIGHT MORE THAN FIVE FEET (5') FOR A BUILDING
THAT IS TWENTY FEET (20') OR LESS IN HEIGHT OR SEVEN FEET (7')
FOR A BUILDING ABOVE TWENTY FEET IN HEIGHT UNLESS
GREATER HEIGHT IS NEEDED TO SCREEN MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT. (R)

3. ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) ARCHITECTURE AND APPLIED TREATMENTS THAT EXPRESS
CORPORATE IDENTITY SHALL BE TEMPERED TO PROVIDE UNIQUE
STRUCTURES THAT COMPLIMENT AND BLEND WITH THEIR
IMMEDIATE CONTEXT. (R)

(3.2) PARKING SHADE AND CANOPY STRUCTURES SHALL BE
COMPLIMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE PRIMARY
BUILDINGS AND HAVE MINIMAL VISUAL IMPACT TO THE PUBLIC
STREETSCAPE AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. (R)

4. ARTICULATION.

(4.1) BUILDING FACADES VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS AND
ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT EXCEED 100-FEET
SHALL CONTAIN ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND
DETAILING SUCH AS TEXTURAL CHANGES, PILASTERS, OFFSETS,
RECESSES, WINDOW FENESTRATION, SHADOW BOXES AND
OVERHEAD/CANOPIES. (R)

(4.2) THE BUILDING FACADE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A
SENSE OF HUMAN SCALE AT GROUND LEVEL BY PROVIDING A
CLEAR ARCHITECTURAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR
LEVELS AND ALL ADDITIONAL LEVELS. (R)

(4.3) BUILDING ENTRANCES SHALL BE IDENTIFIABLE AND
DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE FROM A PUBLIC SIDEWALK. (R)

5. COLORS/MATERIALS.

(5.1) ALL SIDES OF A STRUCTURE SHALL EXHIBIT DESIGN
CONTINUITY AND CONTAIN MULTIPLE EXTERIOR ACCENT
MATERIALS THAT EXHIBIT QUALITY AND DURABILITY. EXAMPLES
INCLUDE MATERIALS SUCH AS BRICK, STONE, COLORED
TEXTURED CONCRETE OR STUCCO. ROOF MATERIALS MAY
INCLUDE TREATED METAL, CONCRETE, AND CLAY TILES,




Page 339
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

DECORATIVE WOOD, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS. (R)

(5.2) MULTIPLE BUILDINGS ON THE SAME SITE SHALL BORROW
AND INCORPORATE (NOT DUPLICATE) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES,
MATERIALS, FORMS, FEATURES, COLORS AND COMPATIBLE
ELEMENTS FROM THE SAME SITE. THESE SHALL INCLUDE:
CONTINUATION OF DISTINCTIVE ROOFLINES, COVERED WALKWAY
ALIGNMENTS, CONSISTENT DETAILING OF FINISH, ACCENT
FEATURES ON ALL VISIBLE SIDES OF STRUCTURES, COMPATIBLE
SHAPES, MATERIAL, WALL AND LANDSCAPING TREATMENT. (R)

(5.3) THE EXTENSIVE USE OF THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL
TREATMENTS AND DETAILS ARE STRONGLY DISCOURAGED AND
SHALL BE LIMITED IN THEIR PROPOSED APPLICATION:

- COLORED PLASTIC OR FIBERGLASS

- SHINY METAL DETAILS OR REFLECTIVE MATERIALS

- UNTEXTURED CONCRETE, UNFINISHED BLOCK, STEEL PANELS,
OR ASPHALT SHINGLES AS A PREDOMINANT EXTERIOR MATERIAL.
(R)

(5.4) CORPORATE COLORS, ASSOCIATED GRAPHICS, AND HIGHLY
CONTRASTING BANDS OF VIBRANT COLORS ON BUILDINGS AND
ON ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (EXCLUDING SIGNAGE) SHALL BE
USED AS AN ACCENT FEATURE WITH RESTRAINT AS A MINOR
ELEMENT OF THE BUILDING’S EXTERIOR. (R)

(5.5) PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC
STREETS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 30% OF
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COMPOSED OF ALTERNATIVE BUILDING
MATERIALS SUCH AS GLASS, BRICK, MASONRY, STONE AND
STUCCO. (R)

6. PUBLIC AMENITIES/ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

(6.1) PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND
GATHERING AREAS SHALL BE SHADED (MINIMUM 50 PERCENT AT
MATURITY) FOR THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF
PEDESTRIANS AND TO ENCOURAGE USE. (R)

(6.2) OVERHANGS AND CANOPIES SHALL BE INTEGRATED IN THE
BUILDING DESIGN ALONG ALL PEDESTRIAN THOROUGHFARES.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTERS WITH EXTERIOR
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, CONTINUOUS SHADE PROTECTED




Page 340
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

WALKWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED. (R)

(6.3) THERE SHALL BE CONVENIENT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS BETWEEN BUS STOP/SHELTER AND THE BUILDING
ENTRY AND/OR ACTIVITY AREA(S). (R)

7. SCREENING.

(7.1) SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED AWAY FROM PUBLIC
VIEW. (R)

(7.3) ALL SCREENING SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE
WITH THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. (R)

(7.5) ALL NEW OR RELOCATED ELECTRIC LINES 12 KV AND
SMALLER, COMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE TELEVISION AND ALL
ON PREMISE WIRING SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND IN ALL
DEVELOPMENTS WHERE VISIBLE FROM STREETS OR ADJOINING
PROPERTIES. (R)

ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES.

THE FOLLOWING ARE ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES APPLICABLE TO
ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SUPERBLOCK 3, USING THE SAME
IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS PER SECTION 507.C OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE:

1. A MAXIMUM OF 60% OF EXTERIOR BUILDING FACADES SHALL BE
FINISHED WITH STUCCO MATERIAL. (R)

2. LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE SIDEWALKS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE. (R)

3. LIGHTING SHOULD BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL MULTI-USE
TRAILS PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE. (P)

4. WHERE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS CROSS A VEHICULAR PATH, THE
PATHWAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DECORATIVE PAVERS,
STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR OTHER PAVEMENT
TREATMENTS, THAT VISUALLY CONTRASTS PARKING AND DRIVE
AISLE SURFACES. (R)

5. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE DECORATIVE




Page 341
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

PAVERS, STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR SIMILAR
ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL. (R)

6. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE ENHANCED
LANDSCAPING ON BOTH SIDES WITHIN MINIMUM 250-SQUARE-
FOOT LANDSCAPE AREAS AND SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM
5-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN, PLANTED WITH A VARIETY OF
AT LEAST THREE PLANT MATERIALS, AND MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS WITH THE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN. (R)

7. TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL SITE
ENTRIES AND EXITS TO SLOW DOWN VEHICULAR SPEEDS AS THEY
APPROACH SIDEWALKS. (R)

8. INTERIOR WALLS AND PRIVACY FENCING SHALL USE MATERIALS
AND COLORS THAT BLEND WITH THE NATURAL DESERT
ENVIRONMENT. (R)

9. A COMBINATION OF VIEW WALLS/FENCING AND PARTIAL VIEW
WALLS/FENCING SHALL BE INCORPORATED ALONG PROPERTY
LINES ADJACENT TO DEDICATED PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE AREAS, NATURAL AND/OR IMPROVED DRAINAGEWAYS OR
RECREATIONAL AREAS. (R)

10. DRAINAGE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO LOOK NATURAL IN
THE DESERT SETTING THROUGH COLOR, TEXTURE,
LANDSCAPING, OR OTHER MEANS. (R)

11. ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED AT ALL PUBLIC STREET CROSSING LOCATIONS TO
INTERCONNECT THE PEDESTRIAN TRAILS THROUGHOUT THE
ENTIRETY OF THE SITE. (R)

12. WASTE STATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE A COMPOST RECEPTACLE
WHENEVER POSSIBLE, WITH INFORMATIONAL SIGNS INDICATING
WHAT TYPE OF WASTE SHOULD GO IN WHICH RECEPTACLE. (P)

***

Amend Appendices A.2 (Plant Lists), Page A-2 as follows:

A.2 Plant Lists

The Staff Recommended Plant List was prepared by the City of Phoenix Planning




Page 342
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

Department staff with assistance from the staff botanist/horticulturalist in the Water
Conservation and Resources Division of the Water and Wastewater Department. The
list includes a combination of native and introduced plants that are suitable to the
Sonoran Desert. Suitability includes drought tolerance and mature height similar to
Sonoran Desert vegetation. These plants were also selected for their adaptability to the
climatic conditions, lower winter nighttime temperatures and more frequent frosts in
Area C.

A Supplemental Plant List is included which identifies six specific development areas in
the Desert Ridge project. In each of the six development areas, additional plant
materials are listed that can be used to supplement the recommended plant list.
Compliance with the Desert Ridge Plant List and the Supplemental Plant List will be
enforced by the Desert Ridge Review Board. Tall palm trees (i.e., Date Palm, Fan Palm,
Mexican Blue Palm) shall be located only in the Village Core, and resort areas;,
SUPERBLOCK 3 DEVELOPMENT PARCELS, AND parcels 4RH and 5A.

***

Amend Appendices A.2 (Plant Lists. Supplemental Plant List), Page A-9 as
follows:
***

SUPERBLOCK 3

PALMS

DATE PALMS

TREES

HERITAGE LIVE OAK
EVERGREEN ELM
RED PUSH PISTACHE

***




Page 343
ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2


Date of VPC Meeting April 4, 2023
Proposal Amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan for
Development Parcels 3.CP/BP.1 and 3.CP/BP.2 to
facilitate the Mayo Clinic expansion including integrated
clinical practice, education and research, as well as the
creation of a new “Discovery Oasis” biotech and
healthcare corridor.
Location Generally located south of the 101 Freeway, east of 56th
Street, west of 64th Street, and north of the Reach 11


VPC DISCUSSION:

Cases GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 and Z-4-23-2 were heard concurrently.

Five members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION

Sarah Stockham, staff, described the Desert Ridge Specific Plan amendment process
and provided an overview of the location of the subject site and the proposed amended
text.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION

Nick Wood, representing the applicant with Snell and Wilmer, LLP, described the
project area, purchase history, GPA and rezoning requests, proposed development
types, traffic improvements and displayed the open space and pedestrian circulation
plan.

Mark Engstrom, with Mayo Clinic, described Mayo’s initiative to further to expand their
facilities. Mr. Engstrom stated Mayo’s three focus areas are regarding a sustainable
environment and that new buildings will be built to LEED standards, community
engagement via food trucks, parks and events that residents can enjoy on the
weekends and managing traffic. Mr. Engstrom added that they would like to add retail
and amenities on site to support employees and visitors and are exploring a mechanism
to get users from/to Mayo and the Desert Ridge shopping center.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 344
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
April 4, 2023
Page 2


QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE

Committee Member Rick Powell stated he enjoyed the presentation and inquired
about the southeast corner of 56th Street and the 101 Freeway and if that would be
developed early on. Mr. Wood stated it would be developed early on and they are
expecting a mix of uses. Mr. Powell inquired about Mayo Clinic being a not-for-profit
organization and if they pay some property taxes. Mr. Engstrom stated Mayo Clinic is
tax-exempt, retains ownership of the land but each development will be privately owned
and not tax-exempt.

Committee Member Rick Nowell asked the applicant to speak to being exempt from
the Desert Ridge Comprehensive Sign Plan. Mr. Engstrom replied that they will
integrate signage standards from the Desert Ridge Specific Plan and the PUD so that it
is all cohesive given the different users on the site, there are some existing monument
signs, and they are looking to have signage to direct patients and families from the
freeway. Mr. Wood added that they do not intend to have billboards.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

Kelli Slavik introduced herself as a resident in Paradise Ridge who recently purchased
a home in the area. Ms. Slavik asked for clarification on the lot coverage and number of
stories being requested under this PUD, sharing that 100% lot coverage and 250 feet in
height abutting residential is inappropriate, asked that she be kept in the loop even
though she is outside of the 600-foot notification area, shared a concern about water
flow and potential flooding, and asked that a traffic study be completed.

Committee Member Michelle Santoro asked what the distance is between 64th Street
and the homes to the east.

Mr. Wood replied that there is a vacant parcel zoned R1-6 owned by ASLD that is
around 50 acres in size east of 64th Street, the homes are to the east of that, the wash
will be channelized which will reduce flood impact, 250 feet in height is already
approved in the Desert Ridge Specific Plan, those buildings will not be put near
residential, but they are asking for the height so that they have options. Mr. Engstrom
added that they are trying to address two surrounding washes nearby that fall across
their site, and the lot coverage is 75% for the PUD.

Committee Member Rick Nowell asked for clarification that the Desert Ridge Specific
Plan allows for 0.85 FAR (floor area ratio). Mr. Engstrom replied affirmatively.

Carol Shilliday introduced herself as a nearby resident and a board member of the
Paradise Ridge Homeowner’s Association. Ms. Shilliday inquired about the notification
requirement as she hasn’t received anything and shared concern that this request is a
blank check for Mayo.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 345
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
April 4, 2023
Page 3


Rich Santoro introduced himself as a nearby resident and inquired about Mayo’s
current height. Mr. Engstrom shared it is not 250 tall, the clinic is around 175 feet tall.
Mr. Santoro asked if the facility is going to be used to treat and research infectious
diseases, and if it will use CRISPR technology. Mr. Engstrom replied that they will not
have Level 4 labs, will not have experimental disease research and they will not treat
animals or birds. Mr. Santoro added that Mayo does not take Medicare unless you are a
legacy patient, asked what the benefit is to the community, and shared a concern with
getting to the hospital on time. Mr. Engstrom replied that he believed Mayo does take
Medicare and that due to high demand, scheduling appointments can be difficult.

Vijay Vittal introduced himself as a local resident and inquired about the Mayo Clinic
being in proximity to the City of Phoenix Water Treatment Facility and asked how the
proposal will impact the facility. Mr. Wood replied the applicant is aware and their
proposal will not impact the facility.

Katherine Box yielded her team to Carol Shilliday. Ms. Shilliday mentioned she was
unaware of the ongoings of what Mayo has planned, shared that she thought the
applicant needed to go back and have a neighborhood meeting, the Desert Ridge
Specific Plan calls for two-story buildings, and that there is no guarantee Mayo will not
sell the site once it is rezoned.

APPLICANT RESPONSE

Mr. Wood shared the city requires applicants to send letters to registered neighborhood
organizations in a one-mile radius and to property owners within 600 feet of the site,
and they go above that and notify those within 700 feet. Mr. Wood added that the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan already allows 250 feet in height, they are looking for
flexibility, and that Mayo does not intent to sell the land. Mr. Wood shared there are no
site plans, elevations, or landscape plans at this time, however they look forward to
coming back before the VPC.

COMMITTEE DICUSSION

Chairman Bowser inquired about impact fees and if they apply. Mr. Wood stated there
are impact fees that apply in the area.

Committee Member Rick Powell inquired about $50 million that will be used for
infrastructure and asked what is it for and when it will be used. Mr. Engstrom shared
those fees will be codified in a development agreement that includes improvements to
roads, drainage, and the signalization of 64th Street and Mayo.

Committee Member Doug Dickson recommended that Ms. Shilliday register the HOA
with the City of Phoenix to receive notification for all items like this one, the VPC had
approved the height years ago, and the public can provide more input on this topic as
this rezoning case continues and they can speak to the Mayor and City Council as well.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 346
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
April 4, 2023
Page 4



Committee Member Rick Nowell shared there is a lot of open space on the site and
asked if each site development will have to go through the rezoning process and come
back to the VPC. Mr. Wood replied that individual sites would not come back to the
VPC.

Chair Bowser added that the sites would go through the development review process
and be reviewed by staff, and if they need to request variances they would need to go
through that process. Chair Bowser reiterated that this request would come back to the
VPC for recommendation, and then to Planning Commission and City Council for final
approval.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 347
ATTACHMENT D




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2


Date of VPC Meeting August 1, 2023
Proposal Amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan for
Development Parcels 3.CP/BP.1 and 3.CP/BP.2 to
facilitate the Mayo Clinic expansion including integrated
clinical practice, education and research, as well as the
creation of a new “Discovery Oasis” biotech and
healthcare corridor.
Location Generally located south of the 101 Freeway, east of 56th
Street, west of 64th Street, and north of the Reach 11
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 10-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

Item No. 6 (GPA-DSTV-1-23-2) and Item No. 7 (Z-4-23-2) are companion cases and
were heard together.

Committee Member Michelle Santoro returned to the meeting, bringing quorum to 11
members.

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided a presentation on the proposal, summarizing the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan amendment and the rezoning to PUD, providing information
about the proposed development, and describing the staff recommendation on both
cases, including recommended stipulations.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION
Nick Wood, representing the applicant with Snell & Wilmer, LLP, described the
proposed development and the goals for the Mayo Clinic expansion. He further
described the proposed development standards and the enhanced features related to
the city’s policy goals.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Committee Member Powell asked about the height of the proposed subacute facility at
the eastern edge of the site. Mr. Wood replied that it would be three stories. Mr. Powell
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 348
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
August 1, 2023
Page 2


asked about the build-out of 64th Street. Christine Mackay, the City of Phoenix
Community and Economic Development Department Director, replied that the City is
responsible for the build-out of 64th Street, per a development agreement. Chuck
Wright, a member of the development team with Kimley-Horn, added that it will be
three lanes in each direction with a median. Mr. Powell asked if the shared use paths
would be landscaped. Mr. Wood replied that they will be.

Committee Member Nowell asked for clarification on the bicycle lanes on Mayo
Boulevard and the space for pedestrian traffic. Mr. Wright replied that they will be
buffered bike lanes and that pedestrians will be in a separate sidewalk area.

Committee Member Kirkilas asked about the necessity of reducing the setback to the
Reach 11 from 100 feet to 65 feet. Mr. Wood replied that the development needs the
space.

Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the timeframe for build-out. Mr. Wood stated it would
be 20 to 30 years.

Committee Member Kollar asked about the biosecurity level of the proposed wet lab.
Ms. Mackay replied that it will be BSL 2.

Committee Member Nowell stated a concern about after hours lighting at the proposed
development. Mr. Wood replied with the lighting requirements, which will be 1 foot
candle at the property boundaries. Chair Bowser added that 1 foot candle is a low level
of light.

Committee Member Powell stated a concern about the proposed 250-foot height limit,
adding that near the freeway is appropriate, but not near the eastern edge. Mr. Wood
stated that the development needs the flexibility, although they may never build that tall.

Vice Chair Lagrave stated that the proposal is near the core and is designated as a
regional center, adding that he is in favor.

Committee Member Dickson stated that the original 250-foot height limit for the Mayo
Clinic was approved without much controversy and that this proposal isn’t much
different since it is still a far distance from the nearest homeowners, adding that he is in
favor.

Committee Member Younger asked for clarification that the 250-foot height limit is
proposed in case a portion of the development needs it in the future. Mr. Wood replied
affirmatively, adding it is needed for flexibility. Chair Bowser clarified that the 250-foot
height would only be for a maximum of 10 percent of the site.

Committee Member Kirkilas stated that the height proposed isn’t a compromise if the
height is not allowed today. Mr. Wood stated that the proposal could do more than 10

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 349
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
August 1, 2023
Page 3


percent of the lot area with the additional height, but the proposed 10 percent limit
represents a more limited approach.

Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he supports the proposal.

Committee Member Powell stated he has concerns about the height in the PUD area.
Mr. Wood reiterated the need for the option of additional height.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.

MOTION - GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to recommend approval of GPA-DSTV-1-23-2, per
the staff recommendation. Committee Member Doug Dickson seconded the motion
for approval.

VOTE - GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
10-1, motion to recommend approval of GPA-DSTV-1-23-2, per the staff
recommendation, passed; Committee Members Barto, Dickson, Kollar, Nowell, Powell,
Reynolds, Santoro, Younger, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Committee Member Kirkilas
opposed.


STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 350
ADDENDUM A
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
STAFF ANALYSIS
October 3, 2023

Application: GPA-DSTV-1-23-2

Applicant/Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Owner: Arizona State Land Department and Mayo Clinic
Arizona

Location: Generally located south of the 101 Freeway, east of
56th Street, west of 64th Street, and north of the
Reach 11

Acreage: 417.63 acres

Proposal: Amend the Desert Ridge Specific Plan text for
Development Parcels 3.CP/BP.1 and 3.CP/BP.2 to
facilitate the Mayo Clinic expansion including
integrated clinical practice, education and research,
as well as the creation of a new “Discovery Oasis”
biotech and healthcare corridor.

Planning Commission Meeting October 5, 2023
Date:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in
Exhibit A

SUMMARY:

General Plan Amendment Case No. GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 is a request to amend the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan text for Development Parcels 3.CP/BP.1 and 3.CP/BP.2 to
facilitate the Mayo Clinic expansion including integrated clinical practice, education and
research, as well as the creation of a new “Discovery Oasis” biotech and healthcare
corridor.

The Desert View Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on April 4, 2023
for information only and August 1, 2023. The VPC recommended approval, per the staff
recommendation, by a 10-1 vote.




Page 351
Addendum A to the Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
October 3, 2023


The Street Transportation Department requested that the applicant limit medical office
uses due to trip generation created by this use. This will be limited during the master
planning process as required by the proposed amendment language. The applicant
proposed some additional limitations on non-residential uses and proposed to limit the
density for multifamily residential in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1. Additionally, the
applicant has requested to change back to the original language that exists in the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan for Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, where the existing Mayo
Clinic Hospital is located, in order to avoid unintended consequences with what is
permitted with the existing zoning entitlement. Lastly, the applicant is proposing to
create a new development parcel, 3.CP/BP.3, for the ASU Health Futures Center, to
retain the existing zoning entitlements for the ASU site with no changes made.

The previous request was per the proposed amendment language attached to the staff
report dated July 24, 2023. The following modifications are included in the amended
request:
• Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1:
o Modify the size of the development parcel to 162.30 gross acres.
o Add a clarifying statement prior to the “Base Permitted Uses and
Development Standards” section to clarify the regulatory framework of the
“Base” and “Enhanced” permitted uses and development standards.
o “Base” section:
 List multifamily residential as a use separate from C-1 uses in order
to clarify that multifamily residential uses are not limited to a
maximum area of the development parcel.
 Add the word “Non-residential” prior to C-1 uses as a permitted
use.
 Modify the maximum density to 200 dwelling units.
 Modify the non-residential use limitation to 500,000 square feet of
gross floor area.
 Delete the provision requiring a certain percentage of non-
residential uses to be internal to a building.
 Delete the provision requiring each new development to update the
master development plan to track the limitations for non-residential
uses, since master plans are already a requirement in a separate
provision.
 Add the design guidelines that were previously listed as being
applicable to the entire superblock to this section to clarify the
applicable design guidelines for this development parcel.
 Relocate the street standards specific for Development Parcel
3.CP/BP.2 into the section for 3.CP/BP.2.
o “Enhanced” section:
 Add a clarifying statement indicating when the “Enhanced” section
can be utilized.




Page 352
Addendum A to the Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
October 3, 2023

 Delete multifamily residential per R-5 standards and single-family
residential per R-3 standards. Retain “Multifamily residential” as an
enhanced permitted use.
 Delete “biomedical and medical research offices and/or laboratory”
since “research laboratories for scientific research, investigation,
testing or experimentation which may include prototype product
development” is already a permitted use in the Commerce Park
District / Business Park Option.
 Reduce maximum floor area ratio (FAR) to 0.65.
o Relocate the design guidelines to the 3.CP/BP.1 section so the design
guidelines are only applicable to Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1.
o Delete a design guideline related to sight visibility triangles within parking
garages due to this already being required and reviewed normally through
the development review process.
o Modify several design guidelines from (R) to (R*) to require that any
modification requests are reviewed by the Design Review Committee
(DRC) due to their subjective nature, rather than to apply for a variance,
as established in Section 507.C of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
• Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2:
o Modify the size of the development parcel to 231.45 gross acres.
o Revise the language back to the original language for permitted uses.
o Delete the reference to Appendix A.9 for the definition of “Hospital”.
o Delete “Enhanced” section for this development parcel.
o Add development standards previously listed under Development Parcel
3.CP/BP.1, that were intended to be for the entire superblock, to this
section to clarify the applicable development standards for Development
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, in order for the development to be compatible in design
for both Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1 and 3.CP/BP.2.
• Update the FAA’S FORM-7460 requirement to apply to buildings that exceed 70
feet in height.
• Add clarifying words or statements, section numbers, re-lettering and re-
numbering as needed, and other technical corrections.
• Create a new section, Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.3, for the ASU Health
Futures Center, using the existing language in the Desert Ridge Specific Plan for
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-DSTV-1-23-2, as shown in the recommended text
in Exhibit A. The proposed amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan promotes
economic development in an area that is within close proximity to a freeway and within
a Major Employment Center.




Page 353
Addendum A to the Staff Analysis GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
October 3, 2023


Writer
Adrian Zambrano
October 3, 2023

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Location Map
Aerial Map
A: Proposed Amendment Language (58 pages)




Page 354
PINNACLE PEAK RD


RD
ST RAN
GE
R DR
FREMON DR 44TH

R
T
LOCK D
W OO
O
U
G H RIDE R R
D PAT
HF
IND
BLACK MOUNTAIN BLVD

WAY ER
T DR
O 40 A
TH TO
AVIAN S R
DE E
CACTUS D R COLLE
NE R VA L
C
LO LE Y
DR
CO
LL
E CT
ROSE GARD O R
EN LN B
TATUM B LV D 56TH ST 64TH ST
Page 355
52ND ST
v
w
BEARDSLEY RD
U TO
MAY
51 O PI
A
£
¤ BL
VD RD

GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
REVISED 9/05/2023

Desert Ridge Specific Plan Area
!!!!!
!!!!!
Superblock 3 ( 417.63 a.c.) !!!!!
!!!!!
!!!!!
3.CP/BP.1 (162.30 a.c.) !!!!!
32ND ST !!!!!

3.CP/BP.2 ( 231.45 a.c.)
CHAUNCY LN
!!!!!!
!!!!!! 68TH ST
!!!!!! 3.CP/BP.3 ( 23.88 a.c.)
!!!!!!
GROVERS AVE
Miles

¯ 0 0.5 1

S:\Information Systems\GIS\Projects\Desert Ridge Superblock 3\Desert_Ridge_Superblock_3.mxd
PINNACLE PEAK RD


RD
ST RA N
GE
R DR
FREMON DR 44TH

R
T
LOCK D
W OO
O
UG H RIDER R
D PAT
HF
IND
BLACK MOUNTAIN BLVD

WAY ER
DR
O HS
T A
40 TO
AVIAN T R
DE E
CACTUS D R COLLE
NE R VA L
C
LO LE Y
DR
CO
LL
E CT
ROSE GARD O R
EN L
N B
TATUM BLVD 56TH ST 64TH ST
Page 356
52ND ST
v
w 101

BEARDSLEY RD
U TO
MAY
51 O PI
A
£
¤ BL
VD RD
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2
REVISED: 9/05/2023

Desert Ridge Specific Plan Area

Superblock 3 ( 417.63 a.c.)

3.CP/BP.1 (162.30 a.c.)

3.CP/BP.2 ( 231.45 a.c.)
32ND ST
3.CP/BP.3 ( 23.88 a.c.)
CHAUNCY LN
Miles 68TH ST

¯ 0 0.5 1 GROVERS AVE
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
S:\Information Systems\GIS\Projects\Desert Ridge Superblock 3\Desert_Ridge_Superblock_3_Aerial.mxd
EXHIBIT A

GPA-DSTV-1-23-2: Desert Ridge Specific Plan Amendment

Proposed Language:

Amend Chapter 6 (Development Parcel Regulations), Section C.4.D (Non-Core
Parcel Regulations, Modified City of Phoenix Commerce Park/Business Park
Regulations Imposed by Desert Ridge Specific Plan), Pages 6-10 to 6-11 as
follows:

***

Site Plan Requirement

1. A site plan is required for all CP/BP development parcels.

Design Standards

1. All parcels, EXCEPT AS NOTED.

a. Building Height/Setback Relationship: Height is limited to 18 feet within 30
feet of lot lines, with one additional foot of height for every additional foot of
setback to the otherwise permitted maximum height. DEVELOPMENT
PARCELS IN SUPERBLOCK 3 ARE EXEMPT.

b. Required Parking Lot and Wall Setbacks:

1) Tatum Boulevard, 56th Street, 64th Street and Avenue K MAYO
BOULEVARD (FORMERLY AVENUE K): 50 feet minimum from
street right-of-way.

2) 52nd Street, Pima Freeway and all other streets: 30 feet minimum
from right-of-way, EXCEPT FOR THE PORTION OF PIMA
FREEWAY WHICH ABUTS SUPERBLOCK 3 SHALL BE 10 FEET
MINIMUM FROM RIGHT-OF-WAY.

3) All other lot lines except lot lines which abut Reach 11: Parking lots
must be 10 feet minimum from all lot lines; there is no minimum
setback from lot lines for walls. NO MINIMUM SETBACK FOR
SUPERBLOCK 3 PARCELS.

c. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be required in all street rights-of-way,
building and parking lot setback area, parking areas and open space areas
pursuant to City of Phoenix requirements, except that a minimum of 25% of
the required trees shall be 24-inch box or larger.




Page 357
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


d. Walls and Fences: Walls and fences located within or adjacent to a building
or parking lot setback which is adjacent to Tatum Boulevard, 56th Street,
64th Street, MAYO BOULEVARD (FORMELY AVENUE K), and 52nd Street
shall not exceed eight feet in height. Walls and fences adjacent to all other
streets and interior and perimeter lot lines shall not exceed eight feet in
height.

e. Screening: Loading, service, storage, delivery, refuse collection and parking
area must be screened with landscaping, walls or berming (or combinations
thereof) so as to be non-visible when standing six feet in height on the
boundary lines of adjacent streets and properties. Rooftop treatment shall
screen exposure of pipes and mechanical equipment from view so as to be
non-visible when standing six feet in height on the boundary lines of
adjacent streets and properties. Exhaust stacks are exempt from these
screening requirements.

2. Developments Abutting Reach 11: Reach 11 will be developed as a regional
recreational area with a variety of facilities which will provide active and passive
recreational opportunities. Development adjacent to Reach 11 should be
encouraged to consider the recreational facilities as site amenities that have the
long term potential to enhance adjacent land uses. Where a development abuts
Reach 11, the following standards shall apply:

a. Setbacks and Building Height: Buildings shall be set back an average of
100 feet from the Reach 11 property line. If any portion of a building is over
56 feet in height, the setback for the portion of the building shall be
increased one foot for every one foot of height over 56 feet, up to the
maximum permitted height. The first 60 feet of setback from Reach 11 shall
remain as a buffer of open space with native-plant landscaping. Parking and
walls may be placed with a maximum of 50% of the balance of the setback
area. Any buildings with window treatments, architectural facades/building
designs, landscape designs, etc., which focus on Reach 11 may reduce the
required average setback to 60 feet, as approved by the PLANNING AND
Development Services Department. DEVELOPMENT PARCELS IN
SUPERBLOCK 3 ARE EXEMPT, EXCEPT THAT A MINIMUM 65-FOOT
SETBACK SHALL BE REQUIRED FROM REACH 11 REGARDLESS OF
BUILDING HEIGHT.

b. Fencing: If fencing is used at the perimeter of the property or within the
required setback as permitted in the immediately preceding paragraph, it
should be view fencing or an acceptable substitute as permitted by the
PLANNING AND Development Services Department, and Parks AND
Recreation DEPARTMENT, and Library Department. Chain link fencing is
prohibited, except where used within the interior of the site and only where




Page 358
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

it is not visible from the exterior property boundaries, as approved by the
PLANNING AND Development Services Department.

c. Building Architecture/Screening: All building evaluations ELEVATIONS
shall include a mix of building material, vertical and horizontal elements
around the entire building, and shall maintain a campus continuity. Loading,
service, storage, deliver, refuse collection and parking areas which face
Reach 11 must be screened from view. Rooftop treatment shall screen
exposure of pipes and mechanical equipment form view of Reach 11.
Exhaust stacks are exempt from these screening requirements.

***

Amend Chapter 6 (Development Parcel Regulations), Section C.5. (Development
Regulations by Superblock), Pages 6-18 to 6-24 as follows:

***

SUPERBLOCK 3

Superblock 3 is located south of the Pima Freeway, between 56th Street, 64th Street and
Reach 11. This superblock is an area designated for medically-related commerce park
economic development efforts. The uses, zoning, and development standards, AND
DESIGN GUIDELINES included in this amendment are specifically intended to address
these issues SUPPORT SUCH USES.

3.CP/BP.1 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1

Size: 210 186.18 162.30 acres
Uses Permitted: Permitted uses shall be as indicated in Section 626, Commerce
Park District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
(Supp. dated 4/19/95) (Ref. Appendix A.7), as modified below.

Potential APPLICABLE Zoning to Be Applied: CP/BP as per Section 626 of the
chapter. This zoning is to be WAS applied upon City Council approval of the 1995
Major Amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan relating to this superblock.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: THE FOLLOWING SECTION HAS A
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK THAT INCLUDES A “BASE” SECTION AND AN
“ENHANCED” SECTION. THE “BASE” SECTION INCLUDES PERMITTED
USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY RIGHT
WITHOUT TRIGGERING ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THE
“ENHANCED” SECTION INCLUDES ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT ARE ONLY ALLOWED TO BE USED




Page 359
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THIS
SECTION FURTHER BELOW.

Special Conditions and Requirements I. BASE PERMITTED USES AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

1. Commerce Park uses are allowed subject to the standards described in
Section C.4.D of this chapter.

2. 1. Additional Permitted Uses/Development Conditions: The following is a list
of modifications to the permitted uses included in Section 626, Commerce
Park District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance which shall apply exclusively to Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1:

a. Manufacturing related to medical, pharmaceutical and biotechnical
products or equipment. Manufacturing shall include the fabrication
and assembly of finished products or sub-assemblies, so long as the
primary use of the property is not the basic processing and
compounding of raw materials or food products.

COMMERCE PARK (BUSINESS PARK OPTION) USES, SUBJECT
TO THE STANDARDS DESCRIBED IN SECTION C.4.D OF THIS
CHAPTER.

b. Multiple MULTIfamily attached residential. uses at a minimum
density of 17.0 dwelling units per gross acre.

c. B. Retail uses. The maximum gross leasable area for any one
tenant/user shall be 5,000 square feet. The maximum aggregate
gross leasable area of retail uses in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1
shall be 50,000 square feet.
NON-RESIDENTIAL USES PERMITTED PER SECTION 622,
COMMERCIAL C-1 DISTRICT, OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:

1) SUCH USES ARE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 5% OF
THE NET AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
500,000 SQUARE FEET IN GROSS FLOOR AREA.

2) OF THE 5% OF THE NET AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL, 50% OF SUCH USES ARE LIMITED TO BEING
INTERNAL TO A BUILDING (NOT STAND-ALONE USES).

32) THE MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR ANY ONE
TENANT OR USER SHALL NOT EXCEED 10,000 SQUARE
FEET.




Page 360
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


4) EACH NEW DEVELOPMENT SHALL UPDATE THE MAYO
CLINIC MASTER SITE PLAN TO TRACK THESE
PERCENTAGES.

C.D. MEDICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOTECHNICAL PRODUCTS
OR EQUIPMENT, MANUFACTURING

2. MAXIMUM DENSITY: 200 DWELLING UNITS.

3. 2. Building Setbacks: Buildings must be setback a minimum of 100 feet and
an average of 125 feet from 56th Street, 64th Street and Avenue K.
Buildings must be setback 50 feet from all other streets, and the Pima
Freeway. Buildings must be setback 30 feet from all other lot lines.

A. ADJACENT TO MAYO BOULEVARD, 56TH STREET AND 64TH
STREET: MINIMUM 100 FEET, AVERAGE OF 125 FEET

B. ALL OTHER PUBLIC STREETS: MINIMUM 50 FEET

C. PRIVATE STREETS: MINIMUM 25 FEET

D. INTERIOR LOT LINES: 0 FEET

E. ADJACENT TO REACH 11: PER SECTION C.4.D, DESIGN
STANDARDS 2.A, OF THIS CHAPTER.

4. 3. Floor Area Ratio: 0.20 overall limit for development parcel; individual
developments may be up to 0.25.

4. 5. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 56 FEET. MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHTS ARE EXCLUSIVE OF (DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL
FACILITIES ON TOP OF BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL
HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHTS
SPECIFIED BELOW TO ACCOUNT FOR THESE MECHANICAL
FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED SCREENING.

5. LOT COVERAGE: MAXIMUM 50% FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

6. COMMON OPEN SPACE: MINIMUM 10% OF GROSS DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL AREA, ALLOCATED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL AREA.

7. STREET STANDARDS:




Page 361
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

A. MAYO BOULEVARD CROSS SECTION: THE 24-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE MEDIAN ALONG MAYO BOULEVARD MAY BE
REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR WIDENED AND BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT. LANDSCAPE MEDIANS SHALL BE PLANTED TO
THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANARDS PER SECTION
3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE PATH
EASEMENTS: SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE
PATH EASEMENTS SHALL BE DEDICATED WHERE
NECESSARY TO PERMIT DETACHED SIDEWALKS AND
SHARED-USE PATHS, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. MAYO BOULEVARD (NORTH SIDE): A DETACHED SIDEWALK
SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP
LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK
SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF MAYO
BOULEVARD, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE
STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS
CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

D. MAYO BOULEVARD (SOUTH SIDE): WITH RESPECT TO
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-
WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF
CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE
SOUTH SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD, EXCEPT WHERE THERE
ARE EXISTING SIDEWALKS, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF
THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM,
AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

E. 56TH STREET (SOUTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): THE EXISTING
LANDSCAPE STRIP ON THE EAST SIDE OF 56TH STREET
ADJACENT TO THE DETACHED SIDEWALK SHALL BE
REPLENISHED AND PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 8.D.1 OF THIS
CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS




Page 362
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

FE. 56TH STREET (NORTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): A MINIMUM 10-
FOOT-WIDE DETACHED SIDEWALK, WHICH MAY BE LOCATED
WITHIN AN EASEMENT, SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-
WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF
CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE
EAST SIDE OF 56TH STREET, PLANTED TO THE
STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION
3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

GF. 64TH STREET: A DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A
MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED
BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF 64TH STREET,
PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND
MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

HG. PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LOCAL STREETS: MINIMUM 5-FOOT-
WIDE DETACHED SIDEWALKS SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 5-
FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIPS LOCATED BETWEEN THE
BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
FOR PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LOCAL STREETS, PLANTED TO THE
STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION
3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

IH. SHARED-USE PATH ON NORTH SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD: A
MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH EASEMENT
(SUPE) SHALL BE DEDICATED AND A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE
SHARED-USE PATH (SUP) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN
THE EASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG
SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE SUP
MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF THE REQUIRED DETACHED
SIDEWALK WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IF THE LANDSCAPE
STRIP IS PROVIDED PER SECTION 7.C OF THIS CHAPTER.

J. SHARED-USE PATH ON WEST SIDE OF 64TH STREET:
SUBJECT TO ANY APPLICABLE ADOT STANDARDS NORTH OF




Page 363
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

MAYO BOULEVARD, A 10-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH
EASEMENT (SUPE) SHALL BE DEDICATED AND A MINIMUM 10-
FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH (SUP) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND AS APPROVED
OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE SUP MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF THE
REQUIRED DETACHED SIDEWALK WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
IF THE LANDSCAPE STRIP IS PROVIDED PER SECTION 7.GF
OF THIS CHAPTER.

K. MULTI-USE TRAIL CONNECTING TO REACH 11: A 10-FOOT-
WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE) SHALL BE
DEDICATED WITHIN THE EASTERN EDGE OF DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, AND A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-
USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE
EASEMENT TO CONNECT SOUTH TO REACH 11 TRAILS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND
AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

LK. LANDSCAPE STRIP REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION: IN AREAS
WHERE DRAINAGE CULVERTS, RIGHT TURN LANES AND BUS
BAYS OCCUR AND LIMIT AVAILABLE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STRIPS OF THIS SECTION MAY BE
REDUCED OR ELIMINATED BY THE STREET TRANSPORATION
DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE SIDEWALKS AND SHARED USE
PATHWAYS MAY BE PROVIDED IN SUCH AREAS WITHOUT
SIGNIFICANT OFFSET.

8. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS:

A. MILKWEED OR NATIVE NECTAR SPECIES FOR MONARCH
BUTTERFLIES: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE REQUIRED
SHRUBS SHALL BE A MILKWEED OR OTHER NATIVE NECTAR
SPECIES AND SHALL BE PLANTED IN GROUPS OF THREE OR
MORE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

B. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS:

1) ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS AND
REACH 11: 25 FEET

2) ADJACENT TO PIMA FREEWAY: 10 FEET




Page 364
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

3) ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
DEVELOPMENT WITH NO SHARED PARKING OR
SHARED DRIVEWAY: 5 FEET

4) ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
DEVELOPMENT WITH SHARED PARKING OR SHARED
DRIVEWAY: 0 FEET

C. PARKING LOT AREAS: MINIMUM 10% OF INTERIOR SURFACE
AREA, EXCLUSIVE OF PERIMTER LANDSCAPING AND ALL
REQUIRED SETBACKS.

D. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE PLANTING STANDARDS:

1) STREETSCAPE:

A) TREES FOR 10-FOOT-WIDE OR WIDER
LANDSCAPE STRIPS: MINIMUM 3-INCH CALIPER
SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-
TOLERANT SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON
CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

B) TREES FOR 5-FOOT-WIDE, LESS THAN 10-FOOT-
WIDE, LANDSCAPE STRIPS: MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY
DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES PLANTED
20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS.

C) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS,
ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS
MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36
INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF 75% LIVE
COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

D) UTILITY CONFLICTS: WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS
EXIST, THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ON AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN SOLUTION
CONSISTENT WITH A PEDESTRIAN
ENVIRONMENT.

2) LANDSCAPE SETBACKS:

A) TREES FOR 10-FOOT OR WIDER LANDSCAPE
SETBACKS: MINIMUM 50% 2-INCH CALIPER, 25%




Page 365
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

3-INCH CALIPER AND 25% 4-INCH CALIPER LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES
PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN
EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

B) TREES FOR LESS THAN 10-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE SETBACKS: MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR
IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

C) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS,
ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS
TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF 50% LIVE COVERAGE
AT MATURITY.

3) UNCOVERED PARKING AREAS:

A) TREES: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES
DISPERSED THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREA
TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM SHADING REQUIREMENTS
PER SECTION 13 3.CP/BP.1.I.11.E OF THIS
CHAPTER.

B) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS,
ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS
MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36
INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF 50% LIVE
COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

4) COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RETENTION AREAS:

A) TREES: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES
DISPERSED THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREA
TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM SHADING REQUIREMENTS
PER SECTION 13 OF THIS CHAPTER PLANTED 20
FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS ALONG THE PERIMETER OF OPEN
SPACE AND RETENETION AREAS.

B) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS,
ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS
MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36




Page 366
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF 50% LIVE
COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

9. VEHICULAR PARKING: OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WHEN SUPPORTED BY AN
APPROPRIATELY DOCUMENTED STUDY.

A. EV INSTALLED SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING
STRUCTURES, SHALL BE ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) INSTALLED
SPACES, DEFINED AS A PARKING SPACE THAT INCLUDES
ACCESS TO AN EV CHARGER, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. EV CAPABLE SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE REQUIRED
PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING STRUCTURES,
SHALL BE EV CAPABLE SPACES, DEFINED AS A PARKING
SPACE THAT INCLUDES ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL WIRING TO
ALLOW FOR A FUTURE JUNCTION BOX AND APPROPRIATE
VOLTAGE FOR AN OUTLET CAPABLE OF CHARGING A
VEHICLE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

10. BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE:

A. BUFFERED AND WIDENED BIKE LANES: EXISTING BIKE LANES
SHOULD BE WIDENED AND SHALL BE BUFFERED ON BOTH
SIDES OF MAYO BOULEVARD, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. ON-SITE BICYCLE CIRCULATION: BIKE LANES, BIKE
BOULEVARDS, OR OTHER DESIGN STANDARDS TO MAXIMIZE
BICYCLIST VISIBILITY, SAFETY AND BICYCLIST CIRCULATION
ON SITE THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL
BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS
IN THE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDANCE ELEMENT,
CHAPTER 3 (BICYCLE TOOLBOX), OF THE ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. BICYCLE PARKING: BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED
PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H.6 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, IN ADDITION TO THE
FOLLOWING SECURED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR




Page 367
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.25
SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT AND GUEST BICYCLE PARKING
SPACES FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AT A MINIMUM
RATE OF 0.05 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT. NON-SECURED
BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH INVERTED
U AND ARTISTIC RACKS LOCATED NEAR ALL BUILDING
ENTRANCES, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BELOW AND
OPEN SPACE AREAS, AND INSTALLED PER THE
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE.

1) MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL SHALL PROVIDE
SECURED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM
RATE OF 0.25 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT AND
GUEST BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM
RATE OF 0.05 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT.

2) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL PROVIDE
BICYCLE PARKING LOCATED IN COMMON OPEN
SPACE AREAS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.05 SPACES
PER DWELLING UNIT.

D. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS: BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS (“FIX
IT STATIONS”) SHALL BE PROVIDED, MAINTAINED AND
EVENLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL AND SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO SIDEWALKS,
WALKWAYS, SHARED-USE PATHS AND MULTI-USE TRAILS,
SPACED A MINIMUM OF A QUARTER MILE APART. THE
BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS (“FIX IT STATIONS”) SHALL BE
PROVIDED IN AN AREA OF HIGH VISIBILITY AND SEPARATED
FROM VEHICULAR MANEUVERING AREAS, WHERE
APPLICABLE. THE REPAIR STATION SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT
BE LIMITED TO:

1) STANDARD REPAIR TOOLS AFFIXED TO THE STATION.

2) A TIRE GAUGE AND PUMP AFFIXED TO THE BASE OF
THE STATION OR THE GROUND.

3) A BICYCLE REPAIR STAND WHICH ALLOWS PEDALS
AND WHEELS TO SPIN FREELY WHILE MAKING
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BIKE.

E. ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE
REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL INCLUDE
STANDARD ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES, OR STANDARD




Page 368
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

ELECTRICAL OUTLETS FOR SECURED BICYCLE PARKING,
FOR ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING CAPABILITIES.

11. SHADE STANDARDS:

A. SHADE CALCULATIONS AND SHADE STUDY: SHADE
CALCULATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON THE SUMMER SOLSTICE
AT NOON, AS SHOWN ON A SHADING STUDY TO BE
SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SOURCE OF SHADE: SHADE SHALL BE FROM A STRUCTURE,
LANDSCAPING AT MATURITY, OR A COMBINATION OF THE
TWO, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

C. PUBLIC SIDEWALKS AND SHARED-USE PATHS: MINIMUM 75%

D. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS: MINIMUM 50%

E. UNCOVERED PARKING AREAS: MINIMUM 25%, SHADED PER
SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.3.A OF THIS CHAPTER.

F. OCCUPIABLE ROOF AREAS: MINIMUM 50%

G. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS AND BICYCLE PARKING SPACES:
MINIMUM 75%

H. BIKE LANES: MINIMUM 50%

I. CORNERS OF TRAFFIC LIGHTS: MINIMUM 75%, TO ALLOW
PEDESTRIANS TO WAIT COMFORTABLY FOR THE SIGNAL TO
CHANGE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ALL SHADE STRUCTURES
WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL REQUIRE A REVOCABLE
PERMIT FOR ENCROACHMENT IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
SHALL COMPLY WITH VISIBILITY TRIANGLES.

12. GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE: EACH PROJECT WITHIN
THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL IMPLEMENT A MINIMUM OF
TWO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE (GI) TECHNIQUES FOR
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, PER THE GREATER PHOENIX METRO
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
DETAILS FOR ALTERNATIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.




Page 369
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

13. WASTE STATIONS: WASTE STATIONS INCLUDING A LANDFILL
RECEPTACLE AND RECYCLING RECEPTACLE WITH
INFORMATIONAL SIGNS INDICATING WHAT TYPE OF WASTE
SHOULD GO IN WHICH RECEPTACLE SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL
BUILDING ENTRANCES/EXITS (EXCEPT FOR EMERGENCY ONLY
EXITS) AND SHALL BE ALLOCATED THROUGHOUT THE SITE IN
COMMON OPEN SPACE ARES AND ALONG SIDEWALKS, SHARED-
USE PATHS AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AT CONVENIENT
LOCATIONS, TYPICALLY WITHIN A QUARTER MILE OF EACH OTHER.
ADDITIONALLY, RECYCLING CONTAINERS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
EACH GARBAGE CONTAINER PROVIDED.

14. SIGNAGE: THIS DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS EXEMPTED FROM THE
DESERT RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN IF A SEPARATE
COMPREHNESIVE SIGN PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS
APPROVED.

15. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A LOT ADJACENT TO (WITHIN 100
FEET OF) THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY: IN THE EVENT THAT
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OCCURS NEAR THE LOOP 101
FREEWAY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS SHALL APPLY:

A. INDOOR NOISE LEVELS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL NOT
EXCEED A DECIBEL DAY NIGHTLEVEL (DNL) OF 45 DECIBELS,
AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. A SEALED AND SIGNED ANALYSIS BY AN
ENGINEER LICENSED IN ARIZONA WITH A PROFICIENCY IN
RESIDENTIAL SOUND MITIGATION OR NOISE CONTROL SHALL
BE INCLUDED WITH THE BUILDING PLANS SUBMITTED FOR
PHOENIX BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CODE COMPLIANCE
REVIEW TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEER SHALL NOTE IN THE ANALYSIS
THAT THE BUILDING DESIGN IS CAPABLE OF ACHIEVING THE
REQUIRED NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION.

B. NOISE MITIGATION WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE
NORTH SIDE OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1
ADJACENT TO THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY. THE WALL HEIGHT
SHALL BE DETERMINED THROUGH A NOISE ANALYSIS
PREPARED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.
THE WALL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MINIMUM 8-INCH-
THICK CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS (CMU) OR OF CAST-IN-
PLACE CONCRETE AND CONTAIN NO OPENINGS UNLESS
THEY ARE ABOVE THE MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIRED FOR
ADEQUATE NOISE MITIGATION OR FOR DRAINAGE. NOISE
WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO WRAP AROUND




Page 370
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

CORNER LOTS AND AREAS NEAR INTERSECTIONS. WRAP
AROUND WALLS, UPON TURNING A CORNER, SHALL
CONTINUE FOR AT LEAST 120 FEET (APPROXIMATELY TWO
LOT WIDTHS), AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. NOISE WALLS SHALL VARY BY A MINIMUM OF FOUR FEET
EVERY 400 LINEAL FEET TO VISUALLY REFLECT A
MEANDERING OR STAGGERED SETBACK, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

D. THE NOISE WALL, SHALL INCORPORATE STONE VENEER,
STONEWORK, OR INTEGRAL COLOR CMU BLOCK, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

E. THE DEVELOPER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT
DISCLOSE TO PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS AND RENTERS
OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT THE EXISTENCE
OF NOISE FROM THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY. THE FORM AND
CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO RECORDATION.

16. MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS, PER THE
REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 4 OF THIS PLAN, AND PER THE
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (PCD), SECTION 636 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, SHALL BE SUBMITTED, AND SHALL
BE UPDATED WITH EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT, AS APPROVED
BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. IN ADDITION, THE INITIAL
MASTER PLANS SUBMITTED BY THE MASTER DEVELOPER SHALL
ALSO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

A. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF DETACHED SIDEWALKS,
LANDSCAPE WITHIN LANDSCAPE STRIPS, BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AND SHARED-USE PATHS ALONG 56TH STREET,
MAYO BOULEVARD AND 64TH STREET PER SECTION 7 OF
THIS CHAPTER, TO BE INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN
SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRAILS PLAN AND
MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN.

B. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS PER
SECTION 10.C 3.CP/BP.1.I.10.D OF THIS CHAPTER, TO BE
INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN,
BICYCLE AND TRAILS PLAN.




Page 371
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

C. A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION PLAN TO
INCLUDE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION
ON SITE THAT ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST
CONVENIENCE, SAFETY AND COMFORT, WITH A FOCUS ON
CONNECTING THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 NORTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD.

17. ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT:

A. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL STREETS WITHIN
AND ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT WITH PAVING, CURB,
GUTTER, SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, STREETLIGHTS, MEDIAN
ISLANDS, LANDSCAPING, AND OTHER INCIDENTALS, AS PER
PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH
ALL ADA ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.

B. A RED BORDER LETTER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ADOT) FOR
THIS DEVELOPMENT.

C. THIS PARCEL IS IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA)
CALLED ZONE AO, ON PANEL 1315 L OF THE FLOOD
INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRM) DATED JANUARY 4, 2021. THE
FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY, AS APPROVED
BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:

1) THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER IS REQUIRED TO SHOW
THE FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS ON THE GRADING
AND DRAINAGE PLAN AND ENSURE THAT IMPACTS TO
THE PROPOSED FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED,
FOLLOWING THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE
PROGRAM (NFIP) REGULATIONS (44 CFR PARAGRAPH
60.3). THIS INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED TO
PROVISIONS IN THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE
FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE OF THE PHOENIX CITY CODE.

2) A COPY OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL
BE SUBMITTED TO THE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT
SECTION OF THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF
FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS.

3) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO FLOODPLAIN




Page 372
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS.

4) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND A MINIMUM
95% COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FOR THE BUILDING
PADS TO FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.

5) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
FINISHED CONSTRUCTION TO FLOODPLAIN
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

D. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT
DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE AND OPERATIONAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCOTTSDALE MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT (SDL) TO FUTURE OWNERS OR TENANTS OF THE
PROPERTY. THE FORM AND CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS
SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE TEMPLATES AND
INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED WHICH HAVE BEEN REVIEWED
AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.

E. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A NO HAZARD
DETERMINATION FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THAT
EXCEEDS 70 FEET IN HEIGHT FROM THE FAA PURSUANT TO
THE FAA’S FORM-7460 OBSTRUCTION ANALYSIS REVIEW
PROCESS, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL, AS
PER PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

F. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX
ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT
PHASE I DATA TESTING AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SURVEY REPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW
AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO
CLEARING AND GRUBBING, LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR
GRADING APPROVAL.

G. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON
REVIEW OF THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING,
THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A
QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA
RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT




Page 373
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

SHALL CONDUCT PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA
RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.

H. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER
SHALL IMMEDIATELY CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY,
NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND ALLOW TIME FOR
THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY ASSESS THE
MATERIALS.

I. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE
LANDOWNER SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER
OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH
THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

II. CONDITIONS FOR ENHANCED PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS:

DEVELOPMENT WITHIN PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 CAN UTILIZE THE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THIS SUBSECTION ONLY UPON THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS BEING APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE
CITY:

1. BEFORE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR
ANY INDIVIDUAL BUILDING, PROJECT OR USE BY THE CITY WITHIN
THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL, A CONCEPTUAL MASTER
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SITE PLAN (CMDPSP) FOR THE ENTIRETY
OF SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE SHALL BE
SUBMITTED FOR CITY APPROVAL. THIS MEANS, FOR EXAMPLE,
THAT BEFORE ANY PLANS FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL BUILDING,
PROJECT OR USE WITHIN PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 ARE PROCESSED FOR
APPROVAL BY THE CITY, A CMDPSP FOR THE ENTIRETY OF
SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE MUST BE FILED
WITH THE CITY. THE CITY WILL THEN PROCESS THE CMDPSP
THROUGH A STAFF APPROVAL PROCESS. AT A MINIMUM THE
CMDPSP SHALL PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE
FOLLOWING:

A. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT UNIT BOUNDARIES WITHIN THE
SUPERBLOCK.




Page 374
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

B. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) CALCULATIONS FOR EACH
INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT UNIT AND THE ENTIRE SUPER
BLOCK AND MAYO CLINIC PUD AREA.

C. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHTS.

D. PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS.

E. LAND USE FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT UNIT.

2. FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT UNITS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL, THE INITIAL APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT CONCEPTUAL
MASTER PLANS FOR THE ENTIRE SUPERBLOCK AND MAYO CLINIC
PUD SITE, AS DESCRIBED IN THE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT
(PCD) SECTION OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, AND AS
FURTHER CLARIFIED IN THIS SECTION. THE INITIAL DEVELOPER
WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL WILL BE REQUIRED TO
IDENTIFY THE REGIONAL ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THE ENTIRE DESERT
RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT AREA WITH ASSIGNMENT OF
CONTRIBUTION FUNDS AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO EACH
DEVELOPMENT UNIT WITHIN SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE MAYO CLINIC
PUD, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO:

A. 64TH STREET CONNECTION TO BELL ROAD.

B. ULTIMATE MAYO BOULEVARD FROM TATUM BOULEVARD TO
66TH STREET.

C. TATUM BOULEVARD FROM PINNACLE PEAK ROAD TO THE
SOUTH SIDE OF THE CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT (CAP)
CANAL BRIDGE.

D. 56TH STREET FROM RANGER DRIVE TO PINNACLE PEAK
ROAD, AND OTHER AFFECTED CORRIDORS.

E. 64TH STREET FROM LOOP 101 FREEWAY TO PINNACLE PEAK
ROAD.

ANY SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT UNITS CREATED WITHIN A
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SEEKING AMENDMENT TO THE OVERALL
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MASTER PLANS, SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO SUBMIT REVISED DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MASTER
PLANS AND OBTAIN CITY APPROVAL TO AMEND, ASSIGN OR PHASE
ANY IMPROVEMENTS ASSIGNED TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.




Page 375
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

3. A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY
FOR THE ENTIRE SUPERBLOCK 3 AND MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE TO
SUPPORT THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLANS AS
DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT. NO PRELIMINARY PLANS WITHIN A DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNTIL THE STUDY IS REVIEWED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR TIS SUBMISSION TO AND COORDINATING TRANSPORTATION
INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLANS AND IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ADOT).

4. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE DEVELOPER
SHALL HAVE EXECUTED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER
PLANS AND A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
PHOENIX THAT DETAILS FUNDING OBLIGATIONS AND
COMMITMENTS FOR CODE REQUIRED AND REGIONAL STREET,
WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR EACH
DEVELOPMENT UNIT, AS REQUIRED BY THE APPROVED MASTER
PLANS RELATED TO THAT DEVELOPMENT UNIT.

III. ENHANCED PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

1. ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES: UPON COMPLIANCE OF THE
CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE SECTION ABOVE, IN ADDITION TO THE
BASE PERMITTED USES IN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, THE
FOLLOWING SHALL BE PERMITTED:

A. MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PER R-5 MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT OPTION, SECTION 615 OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE

B. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ATTACHED OR DETACHED,
PER R-3 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPTION, SECTION 613 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE

CA. COMMUNITY RESIDENCE CENTER OR HOME

D. BIOMEDICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH OFFICES AND/OR
LABORATORY

EB. HOSPICE




Page 376
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

FC. MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND ASSOCIATED DORMITORIES AND
MEDICALLY RELATED EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES

GD. MOBILE FOOD VENDING AS AN ACCESSORY USE, SUBJET TO
THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:

1) SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS OF SECTION 624.D.87.A
THROUGH M OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, AS
MODIFIED BELOW

2) NO MORE THAN FIVE (5) MOBILE FOOD VENDING UNITS
AT A TIME

3) TO BE PARKED AND LOCATED ON A DUSTPROOFED,
PAVED SURFACE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

4) SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF MAYO
BOULEVARD, 56TH STREET OR 64TH STREET RIGHTS-
OF-WAY

5) THE USE IS LIMITED TO THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM TO 10:00
PM.

HE. MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES ONLY WITH SUBJECT MATTER
RELATED TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSION

2. INCREASED FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR): .85 0.65 OVERALL LIMIT FOR
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

3. INCREASED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHTS ARE EXCLUSIVE OF (DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL
FACILITIES ON TOP OF BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL
HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHTS SPECIFIED
BELOW TO ACCOUNT FOR THESE MECHANICAL FACILITIES AND
ASSOCIATED SCREENING.

A. 250 FEET LIMITED TO 10% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

B. 70 FEET LIMITED TO 75% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

C. 35 FEET LIMITED TO 15% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.




Page 377
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

IV. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1

THESE DESIGN GUIDELINES SHALL APPLY TO ALL DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1.

THE FOLLOWING DESIGN GUIDELINES FROM SECTION 507 TAB A OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL BE ELEVATED FROM
CONSIDERATIONS (C) AND PRESUMPTIONS (P) TO REQUIREMENTS (R)
AND (R*):

A. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT.

1. DESERT PRESERVATION.

(1.1) DEVELOPMENT SHALL MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING
HEALTHY SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION (TREES OVER 4-INCH
CALIPER IN DIAMETER) AND CACTI OVER 3 FEET IN ACCORDANCE
WITH CITY NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS (TABLE 1).
IF REMOVAL IS NECESSARY, MATURE TREES AND CACTI SHALL BE
SALVAGED AND UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

PROTECTED NATIVE PLANTS SHALL MEAN CACTI, WHICH ARE 3
FEET, OR GREATER IN HEIGHT AND TREES WHICH ARE 4 INCHES
OR GREATER IN CALIPER OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIES:

TABLE 1. PROTECTED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS

TREES:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA
ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA
BERBERIS HAEMATOCARPA RED BARBERY
CANOTIA HOLOCANTHA CRUCIFIXION THORN
CELTIS PALLIDA HACKBERRY
CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE
CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILL PALO VERDE
CHILOPSIS LINERARIS DESERT WILLOW
JUNIPERUS SPECIES JUNIPER
OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD
POPULUS FREMONTII COTTONWOOD
PROSOPIS SPECIES MESQUITE
QUERCUS SPECIES SCRIB OAK
RHUS OVATA SUGAR SUMAC




Page 378
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

VAUQUELINEA CALIFORNICA ARIZONA ROSEWOOD
CACTI:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO
FEROCACTUS SPECIES BARREL
FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO
PENICEREUS GREGGII NIGHT-BLOOMING CEREUS

2. GRADING/DRAINAGE.

(2.2) SURFACE, SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHALL BE
DESIGNED TO AVOID HARD LINED CHANNELS. (R)

(2.3) SURFACE SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHALL BE
INTEGRATED WITH THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE DESIGN. (R*)

(2.5) REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ADJACENT TO PERIMETER
STREETS MAY UTILIZE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR RETENTION
PROVIDED:

- A MAXIMUM 50% OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK IS
DEVOTED TO RETENTION.

- THE MAXIMUM DEPTH OF RETENTION WITHIN 20 FEET OF RIGHT-
OF-WAY IS 24 INCHES.

- SIDE SLOPES ARE A MAXIMUM 4:1 (R)

3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) PLANT MATERIALS.

3.1.1 DEVELOPMENT SHALL MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING,
NON-NATIVE HEALTHY PLANTS (TREES 4-INCH CALIPER IN
DIAMETER) OR GREATER) AND CACTI (6 FEET HIGH OR GREATER).
IF REMOVAL IS NECESSARY, MATURE TREES SHALL BE SALVAGED
AND UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

3.1.3 LOW WATER USE PLANTS THAT REFLECT AND ENHANCE THE
IMAGE OF THE SONORAN DESERT SHALL BE USED. (R)

3.1.5 ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE TREATMENT SHALL BE
COMPATIBLE WITH AND RELATE TO ANY ESTABLISHED
DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER IN THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT AREA.
(R*)




Page 379
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


3.1.9 COORDINATE SITE UTILITY ELEMENTS SUCH AS OVERHEAD
POWER LINES, TRANSFORMERS, METER BOXES, BACKFLOW
PREVENTERS, AND FIRE PROTECTION DEVICES, WITH LANDSCAPE
DESIGN TO EFFECTIVELY DIMINISH THE IMPACT OF SUCH
ELEMENTS ON THE SITE CHARACTER. (R*)

3.1.10 TREES SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE WALKWAYS, AND MULTI-USE TRAILS AND PATHS, TO
PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 50% SHADE AND A MINIMUM CANOPY
CLEARANCE OF 6 FEET 8 INCHES. (R)

3.1.11 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND COMFORT SHALL BE
CONSIDERED WHEN SELECTING TREES AND PLANT MATERIAL. (R*)

3.1.13 NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT
MATURITY OR 10% OF THE NET LOT AREA, WHICHEVER IS LESS,
SHALL BE PLANTED IN TURF OR HIGH-WATER USE PLANTS.
FUNCTIONAL TURF AREAS SUCH AS IN PARKS, SCHOOLS,
MULTIPLE-FAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY COMMON AREAS,
INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOT, AND GOLF COURSES ARE
EXEMPT. (R)

3.1.14 A MINIMUM 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT MATURITY
(EXCLUDING HARDSCAPE AREAS) SHALL BE TREATED WITH
LIVING VEGETATION INCLUDING GROUNDCOVER, SHRUBS AND
TREES, AS WELL AS INORGANIC MATERIAL AND AN AUTOMATIC
IRRIGATION SYSTEM. (R)

3.1.15 IF ALLOWED BY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, THE PLACEMENT OF RECYCLING CONTAINERS IN A
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK OR REQUIRED LANDSCAPED
ISLAND SHALL NOT RESULT IN THE ELIMINATION OF ANY
REQUIRED TREES. (R)

(3.2) MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE AREAS.

3.2.1 NATIVE SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION SHALL NOT BE
PRUNED OR REMOVED FROM AREAS IDENTIFIED ON APPROVED
PLANS AS PERMANENT UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE UNLESS
DEMONSTRATED TO THE CITY THAT A HEALTH, SAFETY OR
WELFARE ISSUE EXISTS. THIS INCLUDES REMOVAL OF DEAD
TREES OR CACTI. (R)

3.2.3 A PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE
INSTALLED TO WATER ALL TREES, CACTI, AND PLANTS INSTALLED




Page 380
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS OR
OTHER DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DOCUMENTS TO MINIMIZE
MAINTENANCE AND WATER CONSUMPTION, AND TO MAXIMIZE
PLANT HEALTH, SURVIVABILITY, AND VIABILITY, UNLESS
OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. (R)

(3.4) ART/WATER ELEMENTS.

3.4.1 WATER FEATURES, INCLUDING FOUNTAINS, SHALL BE SITED
TO ALLOW SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT
PRIMARILY TO ON-SITE AND INCIDENTALLY TO OFF-SITE USERS
AND TO MINIMIZE WATER CONSUMPTION. (R*)

3.4.2 IF THERE IS PUBLIC ART, IT SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
OVERALL DESIGN OF A PROJECT. (R*)

4. OPEN SPACE/AMENITIES.

(4.1) IMPROVED OPEN SPACES, PLAZAS AND COURTYARDS SHALL
BE SHADED A MINIMUM 50% AND FUNCTIONAL IN TERMS OF AREA,
DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND AMENITIES TO PROMOTE SAFE
HUMAN INTERACTION. (R*)

(4.2) USABLE PUBLIC SPACE SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM OF
50% SHADING THROUGH THE USE OF TREES OR STRUCTURES
THAT PROVIDE SHADING, OR A COMBINATION OF THE TWO
UNLESS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES
OR OTHER TECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS. (R)

6. PARKING/CIRCULATION.

(6.1) SURFACE PARKING DESIGN.

6.1.3 PARKING AREAS SHALL BE BUFFERED FROM ADJACENT
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND SCREENED FROM STREETS SO
THAT CARS ARE NOT VISIBLE BELOW THE AVERAGE HEIGHT OF
THE HEADLIGHTS. (R)

6.1.7 SURFACE PARKING DESIGN SHALL UTILIZE SHARED ACCESS
DRIVES WITH ADJACENT, SIMILARLY ZONED PROPERTIES. (R)

6.1.9 EXCESSIVE ASPHALT/HARDSCAPE NOT NEEDED FOR
ADEQUATE VEHICULAR MANEUVERING OR PARKING, STAGING OR
MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL BE MINIMIZED. (R*)




Page 381
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

(6.2) PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN.

6.2.3 THE PARKING STRUCTURE EXTERIOR SHALL BE FINISHED
WITH ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND DETAILING THAT
WILL CREATE VISUAL INTEREST FOR ADJOINING PROPERTIES. (R*)

6.2.4 LIGHTING WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL PROVIDE
SAFETY AND SECURITY AND BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER BOTH IN TERMS OF ILLUMINATION
AND FIXTURES. (R*)

6.2.10 THERE SHALL BE A CONVENIENT, CLEAR, SAFE AND
EFFICIENT INTERNAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM WITHIN THE PARKING
STRUCTURE FOR BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
INCLUDING APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE AND PLACEMENT OF
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION CORES (ELEVATORS AND STAIRS). (R*)

(6.3) ACCESS/CIRCULATION.

6.3.2 THE SITE PLAN SHALL CLEARLY EXPRESS THE SEPARATION
BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. (R*)

7. WALLS/FENCING.

(7.1) WALLS ADJACENT TO ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS
SHALL HAVE A FINISHED APPEARANCE. UNTEXTURED,
UNFINISHED BLOCK AND REINFORCED, MORTAR-FREE CONCRETE
WALLS SHALL BE AVOIDED. (R*)

(7.2) WALL LENGTHS EXCEEDING 50 FEET ADJACENT TO
ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS SHALL BE ARTICULATED OR
CONTAIN SUBSTANTIAL LANDSCAPING TO BREAK THE
CONTINUOUS WALL SURFACE AND CREATE VARYING SHADING
PATTERNS. (R*)

8. SITE LIGHTING.

(8.1) ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO PREVENT
DIRECT VISIBILITY OF THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTY. (R)

(8.2) LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED WITH CUT-OFF FIXTURES AND
DEFLECTORS TO DIRECT LIGHT DOWNWARD AND LIMIT ON-SITE
LIGHTING LEVELS TO A MAXIMUM OF 1-FOOT CANDLE AT THE
PROPERTY LINE. (R)




Page 382
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

(8.5) SERVICE AREAS AND OTHER SCREENED AREAS SHALL HAVE
PROPER SECURITY LIGHTING. (R*)

(8.6) LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ILLUMINATION SHALL BE OF
SIMILAR DESIGN AND CHARACTER AS THE PROJECT’S BUILDING
COMPONENTS. (R*)

(8.7) SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE PERSONAL
SAFETY AT BUILDING ENTRANCE/EXITS, AND IN PUBLIC
ASSEMBLY AND PARKING AREAS. (R*)

(8.8) RECOMMENDED LIGHTING LEVELS AND UNIFORMITY RATIOS
ESTABLISHED BY THE ILLUMINATION ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF
NORTH AMERICA (IESNA), AS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE CITY OF
PHOENIX, SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN LIGHTING DESIGN FOR ON-
SITE NON-RESIDENTIAL AND MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. (R*)

B. BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION.

1. PLACEMENT/ORIENTATION.

(1.2) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT
THE ORIENTATION OF SURROUNDING BUILDINGS AND
SURROUNDING STREETS BY MAINTAINING CONTINUITY OF
PEDESTRIAN ROUTES AND PROMOTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR
PEDESTRIAN INTERACTION AT THE STREET LEVEL. (R*)

(1.4) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT
CLIMATIC CONDITIONS BY MINIMIZING HEAT GAIN AND
CONSIDERING THE IMPACT OF SHADE ON ADJACENT LAND USES
AND AREAS. (R*)

(1.5) NATURAL SURVEILLANCE SHALL BE MAXIMIZED IN PROJECT
DESIGN TO ENCOURAGE EASY OBSERVATION OF PEOPLE AND
PROPERTY NEAR ENTRYWAYS, PATHWAYS, PUBLIC SPACES AND
PARKING LOTS. (R*)

(1.6) PROJECTS OR PORTIONS OF PROJECTS IN PUBLIC VIEW
(ADJACENT TO STREETS AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS) SHALL
DEMONSTRATE A GREATER LEVEL OF DESIGN SENSITIVITY AND
DETAIL TO VISUAL IMAGE THAN OTHER DEVELOPMENT. (R*)

2. HEIGHT, BULK, AND AREA.

(2.2) PARAPET WALLS SHALL NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE
BUILDING HEIGHT MORE THAN 5 FEET FOR A BUILDING THAT IS 20




Page 383
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

FEET OR LESS IN HEIGHT OR 7 FEET FOR A BUILDING ABOVE 20
FEET IN HEIGHT UNLESS GREATER HEIGHT IS NEEDED TO SCREEN
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. (R*)

3. ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) ARCHITECTURE AND APPLIED TREATMENTS THAT EXPRESS
CORPORATE IDENTITY SHALL BE TEMPERED TO PROVIDE UNIQUE
STRUCTURES THAT COMPLEMENT AND BLEND WITH THEIR
IMMEDIATE CONTEXT. (R*)

(3.2) PARKING SHADE AND CANOPY STRUCTURES SHALL BE
COMPLEMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE PRIMARY
BUILDINGS AND HAVE MINIMAL VISUAL IMPACT TO THE PUBLIC
STREETSCAPE AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. (R*)

4. ARTICULATION.

(4.1) BUILDING FACADES VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS AND
ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT EXCEED 100 FEET
SHALL CONTAIN ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND
DETAILING SUCH AS TEXTURAL CHANGES, PILASTERS, OFFSETS,
RECESSES, WINDOW FENESTRATION, SHADOW BOXES AND
OVERHEAD/CANOPIES. (R*)

(4.2) THE BUILDING FACADE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A
SENSE OF HUMAN SCALE AT GROUND LEVEL BY PROVIDING A
CLEAR ARCHITECTURAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR
LEVELS AND ALL ADDITIONAL LEVELS. (R*)

(4.3) BUILDING ENTRANCES SHALL BE IDENTIFIABLE AND
DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE FROM A PUBLIC SIDEWALK. (R*)

5. COLORS/MATERIALS.

(5.1) ALL SIDES OF A STRUCTURE SHALL EXHIBIT DESIGN
CONTINUITY AND CONTAIN MULTIPLE EXTERIOR ACCENT
MATERIALS THAT EXHIBIT QUALITY AND DURABILITY. EXAMPLES
INCLUDE MATERIALS SUCH AS BRICK, STONE, COLORED
TEXTURED CONCRETE OR STUCCO. ROOF MATERIALS MAY
INCLUDE TREATED METAL, CONCRETE, AND CLAY TILES,
DECORATIVE WOOD, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS. (R*)

(5.2) MULTIPLE BUILDINGS ON THE SAME SITE SHALL BORROW
AND INCORPORATE (NOT DUPLICATE) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES,
MATERIALS, FORMS, FEATURES, COLORS AND COMPATIBLE




Page 384
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

ELEMENTS FROM THE SAME SITE. THESE SHALL INCLUDE:
CONTINUATION OF DISTINCTIVE ROOFLINES, COVERED WALKWAY
ALIGNMENTS, CONSISTENT DETAILING OF FINISH, ACCENT
FEATURES ON ALL VISIBLE SIDES OF STRUCTURES, COMPATIBLE
SHAPES, MATERIAL, WALL AND LANDSCAPING TREATMENT. (R*)

(5.3) THE EXTENSIVE USE OF THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL
TREATMENTS AND DETAILS ARE STRONGLY DISCOURAGED AND
SHALL BE LIMITED IN THEIR PROPOSED APPLICATION:

- COLORED PLASTIC OR FIBERGLASS

- SHINY METAL DETAILS OR REFLECTIVE MATERIALS

- UNTEXTURED CONCRETE, UNFINISHED BLOCK, STEEL PANELS,
OR ASPHALT SHINGLES AS A PREDOMINANT EXTERIOR MATERIAL.
(R*)

(5.4) CORPORATE COLORS, ASSOCIATED GRAPHICS, AND HIGHLY
CONTRASTING BANDS OF VIBRANT COLORS ON BUILDINGS AND
ON ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (EXCLUDING SIGNAGE) SHALL BE
USED AS AN ACCENT FEATURE WITH RESTRAINT AS A MINOR
ELEMENT OF THE BUILDING’S EXTERIOR. (R*)

(5.5) PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC
STREETS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 30% OF
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COMPOSED OF ALTERNATIVE BUILDING
MATERIALS SUCH AS GLASS, BRICK, MASONRY, STONE AND
STUCCO. (R*)

6. PUBLIC AMENITIES/ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

(6.1) PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND
GATHERING AREAS SHALL BE SHADED (MINIMUM 50% AT
MATURITY) FOR THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF
PEDESTRIANS AND TO ENCOURAGE USE. (R)

(6.2) OVERHANGS AND CANOPIES SHALL BE INTEGRATED IN THE
BUILDING DESIGN ALONG ALL PEDESTRIAN THOROUGHFARES.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTERS WITH EXTERIOR
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, CONTINUOUS SHADE PROTECTED
WALKWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED. (R*)

(6.3) THERE SHALL BE CONVENIENT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS BETWEEN BUS STOP/SHELTER AND THE BUILDING
ENTRY AND/OR ACTIVITY AREA(S). (R*)




Page 385
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


7. SCREENING.

(7.1) SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED AWAY FROM PUBLIC
VIEW. (R*)

(7.3) ALL SCREENING SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE
WITH THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. (R*)

(7.5) ALL NEW OR RELOCATED ELECTRIC LINES 12 KV AND
SMALLER, COMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE TELEVISION AND ALL
ON PREMISE WIRING SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND IN ALL
DEVELOPMENTS WHERE VISIBLE FROM STREETS OR ADJOINING
PROPERTIES. (R*)

V. ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
3.CP/BP.1

THE FOLLOWING ARE ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES APPLICABLE TO
ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, USING
THE SAME IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS PER SECTION 507.C OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE:

1. A MAXIMUM OF 60% OF EXTERIOR BUILDING FACADES SHALL BE
FINISHED WITH STUCCO MATERIAL. (R*)

2. LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE SIDEWALKS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE. (R*)

3. LIGHTING SHOULD BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL MULTI-USE
TRAILS PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE. (P)

4. WHERE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS CROSS A VEHICULAR PATH, THE
PATHWAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DECORATIVE PAVERS,
STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR OTHER PAVEMENT
TREATMENTS, THAT VISUALLY CONTRASTS PARKING AND DRIVE
AISLE SURFACES. (R*)

5. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE DECORATIVE
PAVERS, STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR SIMILAR
ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL. (R*)

6. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE ENHANCED




Page 386
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

LANDSCAPING ON BOTH SIDES WITHIN MINIMUM 250-SQUARE-
FOOT LANDSCAPE AREAS AND SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM
5-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN, PLANTED WITH A VARIETY OF
AT LEAST THREE PLANT MATERIALS, AND MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS WITH THE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN. (R)

7. TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL SITE
ENTRIES AND EXITS TO SLOW DOWN VEHICULAR SPEEDS AS THEY
APPROACH SIDEWALKS. (R*)

8. INTERIOR WALLS AND PRIVACY FENCING SHALL USE MATERIALS
AND COLORS THAT BLEND WITH THE NATURAL DESERT
ENVIRONMENT. (R*)

9. IF PROVIDED, A COMBINATION OF VIEW WALLS/FENCING AND
PARTIAL VIEW WALLS/FENCING SHALL BE INCORPORATED ALONG
PROPERTY LINES ADJACENT TO DEDICATED PUBLIC OR PRIVATE
OPEN SPACE AREAS, NATURAL AND/OR IMPROVED
DRAINAGEWAYS OR RECREATIONAL AREAS. (R*)

10. DRAINAGE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO LOOK NATURAL IN
THE DESERT SETTING THROUGH COLOR, TEXTURE,
LANDSCAPING, OR OTHER MEANS. (R*)

11. ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED AT ALL PUBLIC STREET CROSSING LOCATIONS TO
INTERCONNECT THE PEDESTRIAN TRAILS THROUGHOUT THE
ENTIRETY OF THE SITE. (R*)

12. WASTE STATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE A COMPOST RECEPTACLE
WHENEVER POSSIBLE, WITH INFORMATIONAL SIGNS INDICATING
WHAT TYPE OF WASTE SHOULD GO IN WHICH RECEPTACLE. (C)

3.CP/BP.2 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2

Size: 205 231.45 acres
Uses permitted: Permitted uses shall be as indicated in Section 626, Commerce
Park District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance
(Supp. dated 4/19/95) (Ref. Appendix A.7), as modified below.

Potential APPLICABLE Zoning to Be Applied: CP/BP as per Section 626 of the
chapter. This zoning is to be WAS applied upon City Council approval of the 1995
major amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan relating to this superblock.




Page 387
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


Special Conditions and Requirements: I. PERMITTED USES AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

1. Commerce Park (BUSINESS PARK OPTION) uses are allowed subject to
the standards described in Section C.4.D of this chapter.

2. The development of uses in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall occur only
in the following sequence:

a. Construction of a hospital structure with a minimum of 125 beds
(hospital defined pursuant to the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Ref.
Appendix A.9), including accessory retail wholly within the hospital
structure.

b. Construction (which may occur simultaneously with the hospital
structure defined above) of other medical facilities as defined in
special condition and requirements 3.a.2 below.

c. After the completion of construction of the hospital structure, as
evidenced by the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
construction will be allowed to commence for any other use allowed
in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

3 1 2. The following is a list of modifications to certain design/development
standards and the list of permitted uses included in Section 626,
Commerce Park (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance which shall apply exclusively to Development
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2) PERMITTED USES: PER THE BASE PERMITTED
USES OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, INCLUDING
REQUIRED CONDITIONS TO USE THE ENHANCED PERMTTED
USES, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW:

A. HOSPITAL

B. MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND ASSOCIATED DORMITORIES AND
MEDICAL

C. NURSING HOME

D. DEPENDENT CARE FACILITIES

1) IF FREESTANDING, SUBJECT TO AREA LIMITATIONS OF
SECTION 1.B.




Page 388
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

E. MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES ONLY WITH SUBJECT MATTER
RELATED TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSION

F. MEDICAL APPLIANCE AND OTHER MEDICALLY RELATED
SALES

a. Additional Permitted Uses/Development Conditions:

1) Hospitals (as defined in Appendix A.9)

2) Medical facilities, including:

a) The provision of diagnostic services, extensive
medical treatment including but not limited to
surgical and other hospital services, as well as
continuous nursing service, and including but not
limited to general medical and surgical hospitals,
specialty hospitals, medical clinics, medical
laboratories, outpatient care facilities, medical
schools and associated dormitories, medically
related educational facilities, medical and
associated accessory offices, pharmacies, and
similar uses.

b) Facilities for conducting research in the natural or
physical sciences, or engineering and
development as an extension of investigation with
the objective of creating end products on a
contract or fee basis, and including pilot plant
operation.

c) Manufacturing related to medical, pharmaceutical
and biotechnical products or equipment.
Manufacturing shall include the fabrication and
assembly of finished products or sub-assemblies,
so long as the primary use of the property is not
the basic processing and compounding of raw
material or food products.

d) The provision of intermediate or long-term nursing
and health related care to individuals, typically
classified as nursing homes.

e) Dwelling providing shelter and services for the
elderly or for disabled persons, which may include
meals, housekeeping, personal care assistance




Page 389
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

and minor medical services including intermediate,
long term or extended nursing care for residents.

f) Food services for the employees, visitors and
patients of the medical facility

g) Non-freestanding retail uses within a medical
facility/hospital building, are allowed subject to the
following conditions:

(1) The maximum gross leasable area for any
one tenant/user shall be 5,000 square feet.

(2) All retail sales occur only within the walls of
the medical facility/hospital building. The
entrance to a retail sales business shall be
from within the walls of the medical
facility/hospital building. No external
signage of any kind shall be permitted so as
to be visible from any public thoroughfare or
adjacent property.

h) Helistops or heliports.

i) Clubs, private or public, qualifying by law as a non-
profit entity.

j) Dependent care facilities, subject to the following
conditions:

(1) If the dependent care facility is a
freestanding structure, it shall be subject to
the conditions for freestanding retail uses as
described in 3.a.4 below.

k) Wellness centers/clinics.

l) Museums and galleries only with subject matter
related to the medical profession.

m) Places of worship, only in non-freestanding and
integrated into a hospital or a medical facility
building.

n) Places of assembly, only if indoors, non-
freestanding and integrated into a hospital or a




Page 390
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

medical facility building.

3) Medical appliance and other medically related sales.

4) Freestanding retail uses, are allowed in Development
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 subject to the following conditions:

a) The maximum gross leasable area for any one
tenant/user (other thaNt a restaurant) shall be 5,000
square feet.

b) Freestanding retail uses must be located set back a A
minimum SETBACK of 300 feet from 56th Street,
64th Street and Avenue K MAYO BOULEVARD.
External signage must not be visible from a public
thoroughfare or adjacent property. (It is intended
that the freestanding retail and restaurant uses in
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 be used primarily
by the employees, patients and visitors of the
hospital and medical facilities. These freestanding
retail uses are not intended to be used by persons
not working or visiting within Development Parcel
3.CP/BP.2.)

c) The maximum aggregate gross leasable area or OF
freestanding retail uses and freestanding
restaurants/bars/cocktail lounges in Development
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be 50,000 square feet.

5) Accessory uses with hotels/motels: Non-freestanding
retail newsstands, gift shops or other customary
services, restaurants and cocktail lounges are allowed as
accessory uses within hotels and motels, provided that
the entrance to such uses shall be from within the
exterior walls of the building only.

6) Multiple family attached MULTIFAMILY residential
dwellings. A maximum of 300 multiple family dwellings shall
be allowed in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

7) Single-family detached residential, DETACHED dwellings.
A maximum of 20 single-family dwelling shall be allowed in
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

b. Modifications of Permitted Building Heights.




Page 391
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

The heights of buildings in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be
governed by the table presented below. The maximum building
heights are exclusive of (do not include) the mechanical facilities on
top of the buildings. Consequently, the total height of the structure
may exceed the heights specified below to account for these
mechanical facilities.

2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: PER THE BASE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS FOR ENHANCED DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, EXCEPT AS
MODIFIED BELOW THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF MODIFICATIONS
TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE COMMERCE PARK
(BUSINESS PARK OPTION) ZONING DISTRICT.

A. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:

THE HEIGHTS OF BUILDINGS IN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
3.CP/BP.2 SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE TABLE PRESENTED
BELOW. THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS ARE EXCLUSIVE OF
(DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL FACILITIES ON TOP OF THE
BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THE
STRUCTURE MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHTS SPECIFIED BELOW TO
ACCOUNT FOR THESE MECHANICAL FACILITIES AND
ASSOCIATED SCREENING.


Use Maximum Building Height
Hospitals 250 feet

Clinics 250 feet

Hotels/motels 56 feet

Medical facilities, 56 feet
except hospitals/clinics

Office building for non- 40 feet
two stories, not to
exceed medical
facilities

Retail and restaurant 40 feet
uses

Multifamily residential 56 feet




Page 392
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

All other uses 40 feet

4. Building Setbacks: Buildings must be setback a minimum of 100 feet and
an average of 125 feet from 56th Street, 64th Street (if applicable) and
Avenue K. Buildings must be setback 100 feet from all other streets.
Buildings must be setback 30 feet from all other lot lines. Reach 11 setbacks
are governed by Section C.4.D, Design Standards 2.a, of this chapter.

5 B. Floor Area Ratio: 0.85 overall limit for development parcel.

C. MAXIMUM DENSITY: 300 MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS
AND 20 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS.

6 Parking. Off-street parking and loading requirements may be modified by
the Development Service Department when supported by an appropriately
documented study.

7 Signage.: This development parcel may be exempted from the Desert Ridge
Comprehensive Sign Plan if the city approves a separate comprehensive
sign plan for this development parcel.

8. 3. Relationship of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 to balance of Specific Plan. In the event
that Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 is developed with a minimum 125 bed hospital, then
after the completion of such hospital, the THE DEVELOPMENT parcel shall
be treated as a separate and distinct entity within the Desert Ridge Specific
Plan. Specifically, a single development entity may be designated by the
owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 at the owners’s discretion to be responsible to
the City of Phoenix for all matters related to the specific plan, including but
not limited to reporting on development progress within the parcel, applying
for major and minor amendments, and acting in the place of the Master
Developer with regard to Parcel 3.CP/BP.2. The relationship between
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 and the Desert Ridge Master Developer shall be
governed by the CC&R’s, design guidelines, and other contractual
documents that may be entered into by the property owner and the Master
Developer. This specific plan shall continue to control land uses, design
standards within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as described above in Section C.4.D of
this chapter, and the permitted 25 percent increase or decrease in area of
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as described in Chapter 4 of this specific plan.

4. MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS, PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF
CHAPTER 4 OF THE DESERT RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN AND PER THE
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (PCD), SECTION 636 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, SHALL BE SUBMITTED, AND SHALL
BE UPDATED WITH EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT, AS APPROVED
BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE INITIAL MASTER PLANS




Page 393
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

SUBMITTED BY THE MASTER DEVELOPER SHALL INCLUDE THE
FOLLOWING:

A. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF DETACHED SIDEWALKS,
LANDSCAPE WITHIN LANDSCAPE STRIPS, BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AND SHARED-USE PATHS ALONG 56TH STREET,
MAYO BOULEVARD AND 64TH STREET PER SECTION 7 OF
THIS CHAPTER, TO BE INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN
SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRAILS PLAN AND
MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN.

B. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS PER
SECTION 10.C 3.CP/BP.2.II.4.D OF THIS CHAPTER, TO BE
INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN,
BICYCLE AND TRAILS PLAN.

C. A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION PLAN TO
INCLUDE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION
ON SITE THAT ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST
CONVENIENCE, SAFETY AND COMFORT, WITH A FOCUS ON
CONNECTING THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 NORTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD.

9 The development of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as a medically-related commerce
park is intended to occur in an integrated manner over a period of years. In
order to assure that Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 develops in accordance with the
provisions of the 1995 Major Specific Plan Amendment creating this
development parcel, the following regulations are established. In the event
that construction of a hospital structure, as defined in Appendix A.9, has
commenced by December 31, 1996, the commencement and completion of
such construction shall be permitted pursuant to those applicable provisions
of the 1995 Major Specific Plan Amendment in effect as of the effective date
of said amendment, governing permitted and accessory uses, height of
buildings, lot coverage limitations, floor area ratios, and off-street parking
and loading standards (hereinafter, the “current regulation”), and the
development of the balance of Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 may be
completed pursuant to the current regulations subject to the following
conditions:

a. That within 180 days of the adoption of the 1995 Major Specific
Plan Amendment creating this development parcel, the owner of
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall file with the city a conceptual
site plan (the “site plan”), which plan shall describe, at a minimum
and with a reasonable degree of certainty, all of the following:

1) A conceptual layout of this entire development parcel




Page 394
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

showing individual development units which shall list the use
or uses intended in each individual development unit.

2) The height of the buildings in each individual development
unit.

3) The total square footage of all buildings proposed for Parcel
3.CP/BP.2, together with the proposed allocation of the total
square footage to each individual development unit.

4) The boundaries of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, together with the total
gross land area and net land area of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, as
defined in Section 202 of the City of Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance.

5) The required off-street parking facilities indicating the
number of parking spaces provided for each use within each
individual development unit.

6) The location of any proposed loading space or dock within
any individual development unit.

b. All construction and development within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be
in accordance with the site plan, as may be revised from time to
time as set forth in this paragraph 9.

c. Prior to the completion of construction of the hospital structure, the
owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall submit to the city a revised site
plan showing the hospital structure and any changes to the square
footage of buildings. Changes to the square footage shall be limited
to a reallocation of the total square footage of all buildings to
different development units within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, or within an
existing individual development unit, but the total square footage of
buildings in Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as shown on the original site plan
shall not be changed. Following the submittal of the revised site
plan, the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be permitted to
commence and complete construction of another building or
buildings or structure or structures in any one of the individual
development units pursuant to the current regulations, so long as
the commencement of construction of said building(s) or
structure(s) shall occur not later than 7 years from the submittal of
the revised site plan.

Prior to the completion of the second building or structure, and
each building or structure thereafter, the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2
shall submit to the city a revised site plan showing all buildings




Page 395
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

completed and any changes to the allocation of the total square
footage of buildings between different development units within
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, or within an existing individual development unit.
Following the submittal of each revised site plan, the owner of
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be permitted to commence and complete
construction of the next building or structure, and each building or
structure thereafter, under the current regulations, so long as the
commencement of said construction occurs not later than 7 years
after the submittal of each revised site plan. Construction of each
building or structure within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall follow this
procedure.

d. Whenever the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 submits a site plan to the
city in accordance with this paragraph 9, the owner of Parcel
3.CP/BP.2 shall provide a copy of the submitted site plan to the
Master Developer.

e. If the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 fails to comply with the provisions
of subparagraphs 9.a, 9.b and 9.c above, then future development
of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be governed by the regulations relating to
permitted and accessory uses, height of buildings, lot coverage
limitations, floor area ratios, and off-street parking and loading
standards then in effect.

II. ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
3.CP/BP.2:

1. STREET STANDARDS:

A. MAYO BOULEVARD CROSS SECTION: THE 24-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE MEDIAN ALONG MAYO BOULEVARD MAY BE
REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR WIDENED AND BUFFERED BIKE
LANES, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT. LANDSCAPE MEDIANS SHALL BE PLANTED
TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANARDS PER
SECTION 3.CP/BP.2.II.2 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED
WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE PATH
EASEMENTS: SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE
PATH EASEMENTS SHALL BE DEDICATED WHERE
NECESSARY TO PERMIT DETACHED SIDEWALKS AND
SHARED-USE PATHS, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.




Page 396
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

C. MAYO BOULEVARD (SOUTH SIDE): A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-
WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF
CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE
SOUTH SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD, EXCEPT WHERE THERE
ARE EXISTING SIDEWALKS, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.2.II.2 OF
THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING
SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

D. 56TH STREET (SOUTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): THE EXISTING
LANDSCAPE STRIP ON THE EAST SIDE OF 56TH STREET
ADJACENT TO THE DETACHED SIDEWALK SHALL BE
REPLENISHED AND PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.2.II.2 OF
THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING
SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

E. MULTI-USE TRAIL CONNECTING TO REACH 11: A 10-FOOT-
WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE) SHALL BE
DEDICATED WITHIN THE EASTERN EDGE OF DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, AND A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-
USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE
EASEMENT TO CONNECT SOUTH TO REACH 11 TRAILS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND
AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

F. LANDSCAPE STRIP REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION: IN AREAS
WHERE DRAINAGE CULVERTS, RIGHT TURN LANES AND BUS
BAYS OCCUR AND LIMIT AVAILABLE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STRIPS OF THIS SECTION MAY BE
REDUCED OR ELIMINATED BY THE STREET TRANSPORATION
DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE SIDEWALKS AND SHARED USE
PATHWAYS MAY BE PROVIDED IN SUCH AREAS WITHOUT
SIGNIFICANT OFFSET.

2. STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLANTING STANDARDS:

A. TREES FOR 10-FOOT-WIDE OR WIDER LANDSCAPE STRIPS:
MINIMUM 3-INCH CALIPER, SINGLE-TRUNK, LARGE CANOPY,
DROUGHT-TOLERANT, SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON
CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.




Page 397
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

B. TREES FOR 5-FOOT-WIDE, LESS THAN 10-FOOT-WIDE,
LANDSCAPE STRIPS: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER, SINGLE-
TRUNK, LARGE CANOPY, DROUGHT-TOLERANT, SHADE
TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS.

C. LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS, ACCENTS
AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS MAINTAINED TO A
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF
75% LIVE COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

D. UTILITY CONFLICTS: WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS EXIST, THE
DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN
SOLUTION CONSISTENT WITH A PEDESTRIAN
ENVIRONMENT.

3. VEHICULAR PARKING: OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WHEN SUPPORTED BY AN
APPROPRIATELY DOCUMENTED STUDY.

A. EV INSTALLED SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING
STRUCTURES, SHALL BE ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV)
INSTALLED SPACES, DEFINED AS A PARKING SPACE THAT
INCLUDES ACCESS TO AN EV CHARGER, AS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. EV CAPABLE SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING
STRUCTURES, SHALL BE EV CAPABLE SPACES, DEFINED AS
A PARKING SPACE THAT INCLUDES ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL
WIRING TO ALLOW FOR A FUTURE JUNCTION BOX AND
APPROPRIATE VOLTAGE FOR AN OUTLET CAPABLE OF
CHARGING A VEHICLE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

4. BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE:

A. BUFFERED AND WIDENED BIKE LANES: EXISTING BIKE
LANES SHOULD BE WIDENED AND SHALL BE BUFFERED ON
BOTH SIDES OF MAYO BOULEVARD, AS APPROVED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.




Page 398
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

B. ON-SITE BICYCLE CIRCULATION: BIKE LANES, BIKE
BOULEVARDS, OR OTHER DESIGN STANDARDS TO MAXIMIZE
BICYCLIST VISIBILITY, SAFETY AND BICYCLIST CIRCULATION
ON SITE THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL
BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED PER THE
RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN
DESIGN GUIDANCE ELEMENT, CHAPTER 3 (BICYCLE
TOOLBOX), OF THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. BICYCLE PARKING: BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED
PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H.6 OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, IN ADDITION TO THE
FOLLOWING. NON-SECURED BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE
PROVIDED THROUGH INVERTED U AND ARTISTIC RACKS
LOCATED NEAR ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES, OR AS
OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BELOW, AND INSTALLED PER THE
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE.

1) MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL SHALL PROVIDE
SECURED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM
RATE OF 0.25 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT AND
GUEST BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM
RATE OF 0.05 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT.

2) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL PROVIDE
BICYCLE PARKING LOCATED IN COMMON OPEN
SPACE AREAS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.05 SPACES
PER DWELLING UNIT.

D. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS: BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS
(“FIX IT STATIONS”) SHALL BE PROVIDED, MAINTAINED AND
EVENLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL AND SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO
SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS, SHARED-USE PATHS AND MULTI-
USE TRAILS, SPACED A MINIMUM OF A QUARTER MILE
APART. THE BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS (“FIX IT
STATIONS”) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AN AREA OF HIGH
VISIBILITY AND SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR
MANEUVERING AREAS, WHERE APPLICABLE. THE REPAIR
STATION SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:

1) STANDARD REPAIR TOOLS AFFIXED TO THE STATION.




Page 399
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

2) A TIRE GAUGE AND PUMP AFFIXED TO THE BASE OF
THE STATION OR THE GROUND.

3) A BICYCLE REPAIR STAND WHICH ALLOWS PEDALS
AND WHEELS TO SPIN FREELY WHILE MAKING
ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BIKE.

E. ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE
REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL INCLUDE
STANDARD ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES, OR STANDARD
ELECTRICAL OUTLETS FOR SECURED BICYCLE PARKING,
FOR ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING CAPABILITIES.

5. SIGNAGE: THIS DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS EXEMPTED FROM THE
DESERT RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN IF A SEPARATE
COMPREHNESIVE SIGN PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS
APPROVED.

6. ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT:

A. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL STREETS WITHIN
AND ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT WITH PAVING, CURB,
GUTTER, SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, STREETLIGHTS, MEDIAN
ISLANDS, LANDSCAPING, AND OTHER INCIDENTALS, AS PER
PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH
ALL ADA ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.

B. THIS PARCEL IS IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA)
CALLED ZONE AO, ON PANEL 1315 L OF THE FLOOD
INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRM) DATED JANUARY 4, 2021. THE
FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY, AS APPROVED
BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:

1) THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER IS REQUIRED TO SHOW
THE FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS ON THE
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN AND ENSURE THAT
IMPACTS TO THE PROPOSED FACILITIES HAVE BEEN
CONSIDERED, FOLLOWING THE NATIONAL FLOOD
INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) REGULATIONS (44 CFR
PARAGRAPH 60.3). THIS INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED
TO PROVISIONS IN THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE
FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE OF THE PHOENIX CITY
CODE.




Page 400
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

2) A COPY OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL
BE SUBMITTED TO THE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT
SECTION OF THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF
FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS.

3) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO FLOODPLAIN
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF GRADING AND DRAINAGE PERMITS.

4) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND A MINIMUM
95% COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FOR THE BUILDING
PADS TO FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.

5) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
FINISHED CONSTRUCTION TO FLOODPLAIN
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

C. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT
DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE AND OPERATIONAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCOTTSDALE MUNICIPAL
AIRPORT (SDL) TO FUTURE OWNERS OR TENANTS OF THE
PROPERTY. THE FORM AND CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS
SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE TEMPLATES AND
INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED WHICH HAVE BEEN REVIEWED
AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.

D. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A NO HAZARD
DETERMINATION FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THAT
EXCEEDS 70 FEET IN HEIGHT FROM THE FAA PURSUANT TO
THE FAA’S FORM-7460 OBSTRUCTION ANALYSIS REVIEW
PROCESS, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL,
AS PER PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

E. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX
ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT
PHASE I DATA TESTING AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SURVEY REPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW




Page 401
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO
CLEARING AND GRUBBING, LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR
GRADING APPROVAL.

F. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON
REVIEW OF THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING,
THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A
QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA
RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE
APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL
DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.

G. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE
ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER
SHALL IMMEDIATELY CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY,
NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST, AND ALLOW TIME FOR
THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY ASSESS THE
MATERIALS.

H. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE
LANDOWNER SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER
OF CLAIMS FORM. THE WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH
THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

3.CP/BP.3 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.3

SIZE: 23.88 ACRES
USES PERMITTED: PERMITTED USES SHALL BE AS INDICATED IN
SECTION 626, COMMERCE PARK DISTRICT (BUSINESS PARK OPTION), OF
THE CITY OF PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, AS MODIFIED BELOW.

APPLICABLE ZONING: CP/BP AS PER SECTION 626 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE AS MODIFIED BELOW AND PER SECTION
C.4.D OF THIS CHAPTER. THIS ZONING WAS APPLIED UPON CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF THE 1995 MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE DESERT RIDGE
SPECIFIC PLAN RELATING TO THIS SUPERBLOCK.

I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS:

1. COMMERCE PARK USES ARE ALLOWED SUBJECT TO THE
STANDARDS DESCRIBED IN SECTION C.4.D OF THIS CHAPTER.

2. ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES/DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS: THE




Page 402
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE PERMITTED
USES INCLUDED IN SECTION 626, COMMERCE PARK DISTRICT
(BUSINESS PARK OPTION), OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE WHICH SHALL APPLY EXCLUSIVELY TO
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.3:

A. MANUFACTURING RELATED TO MEDICAL,
PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOTECHNICAL PRODUCTS OR
EQUIPMENT. MANUFACTURING SHALL INCLUDE THE
FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY OF FINISHED PRODUCTS OR
SUB-ASSEMBLIES, SO LONG AS THE PRIMARY USE OF THE
PROPERTY IS NOT THE BASIC PROCESSING AND
COMPOUNDING OF RAW MATERIALS OR FOOD PRODUCTS.

B. MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

C. RETAIL USES. THE MAXIMUM GROSS LEASABLE AREA FOR
ANY ONE TENANT/USER SHALL BE 5,000 SQUARE FEET. THE
MAXIMUM AGGREGATE GROSS LEASABLE AREA OF RETAIL
USES SHALL BE 50,000 SQUARE FEET.

3. BUILDING SETBACKS: MINIMUM 100 FEET AND AN AVERAGE OF 125
FEET FROM 56TH STREET, 64TH STREET AND MAYO BOULEVARD.
MINIMUM 50 FEET FROM ALL OTHER STREETS. MINIMUM 30 FEET
FROM ALL OTHER LOT LINES.

4. FLOOR AREA RATIO: 0.20 OVERALL LIMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL; INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENTS MAY BE UP TO 0.25.

5. DENSITY: MINIMUM 17.0 DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE.

SUPERBLOCK 3 – OVERALL DESIGN GUIDELINES

THE FOLLOWING DESIGN GUIDELINES FROM SECTION 507 TAB A OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL BE ELEVATED FROM
CONSIDERATIONS (C) AND PRESUMPTIONS (P) TO REQUIREMENTS (R):

A. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT.

1. DESERT PRESERVATION.

(1.1) DEVELOPMENT SHALL MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING
HEALTHY SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION (TREES OVER 4"
CALIPER IN DIAMETER) AND CACTI OVER 3' IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CITY NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS (TABLE 1). IF
REMOVAL IS NECESSARY, MATURE TREES AND CACTI SHALL BE




Page 403
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

SALVAGED AND UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

PROTECTED NATIVE PLANTS SHALL MEAN CACTI, WHICH ARE
THREE (3) FEET, OR GREATER IN HEIGHT AND TREES WHICH ARE
FOUR (4) INCHES OR GREATER IN CALIPER OF THE FOLLOWING
SPECIES:

TABLE 1. PROTECTED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS

TREES:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA
ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA
BERBERIS HAEMATOCARPA RED BARBERY
CANOTIA HOLOCANTHA CRUCIFIXION THORN
CELTIS PALLIDA HACKBERRY
CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE
CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILL PALO VERDE
CHILOPSIS LINERARIS DESERT WILLOW
JUNIPERUS SPECIES JUNIPER
OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD
POPULUS FREMONTII COTTONWOOD
PROSOPIS SPECIES MESQUITE
QUERCUS SPECIES SCRIB OAK
RHUS OVATA SUGAR SUMAC
VAUQUELINEA CALIFORNICA ARIZONA ROSEWOOD
CACTI:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO
FEROCACTUS SPECIES BARREL
FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO
PENICEREUS GREGGII NIGHT-BLOOMING CEREUS

2. GRADING/DRAINAGE.

(2.2) SURFACE, SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHALL BE
DESIGNED TO AVOID HARD LINED CHANNELS. (R)

(2.3) SURFACE SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHOULD BE
INTEGRATED WITH THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE DESIGN. (R)

(2.5) REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ADJACENT TO PERIMETER
STREETS MAY UTILIZE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR RETENTION



Page 404
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

PROVIDED:

- A MAXIMUM 50% OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK IS
DEVOTED TO RETENTION.

- THE MAXIMUM DEPTH OF RETENTION WITHIN 20 FEET OF RIGHT-
OF-WAY IS 24-INCHES.

- SIDE SLOPES ARE A MAXIMUM 4:1 (R)

3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) PLANT MATERIALS.

3.1.1 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF
EXISTING, NON-NATIVE HEALTHY PLANTS (TREES 4" CALIPER IN
DIAMETER) OR GREATER) AND CACTI (6' HIGH OR GREATER). IF
REMOVAL IS NECESSARY, MATURE TREES SHOULD BE SALVAGED
AND UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

3.1.3 LOW WATER USE PLANTS THAT REFLECT AND ENHANCE THE
IMAGE OF THE SONORAN DESERT SHALL BE USED. (R)

3.1.5 ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE TREATMENT SHALL BE
COMPATIBLE WITH AND RELATE TO ANY ESTABLISHED
DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER IN THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT AREA.
(R)

3.1.9 COORDINATE SITE UTILITY ELEMENTS SUCH AS OVERHEAD
POWER LINES, TRANSFORMERS, METER BOXES, BACKFLOW
PREVENTERS, AND FIRE PROTECTION DEVICES, WITH LANDSCAPE
DESIGN TO EFFECTIVELY DIMINISH THE IMPACT OF SUCH
ELEMENTS ON THE SITE CHARACTER. (R)

3.1.10 TREES SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE WALKWAYS, AND MULTI-USE TRAILS AND PATHS, TO
PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 50 PERCENT SHADE AND A MINIMUM
CANOPY CLEARANCE OF SIX FEET EIGHT INCHES. (R)

3.1.11 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND COMFORT SHALL BE
CONSIDERED WHEN SELECTING TREES AND PLANT MATERIAL. (R)

3.1.13 NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT
MATURITY OR 10% OF THE NET LOT AREA, WHICHEVER IS LESS,
SHALL BE PLANTED IN TURF OR HIGH-WATER USE PLANTS.
FUNCTIONAL TURF AREAS SUCH AS IN PARKS, SCHOOLS,




Page 405
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

MULTIPLE-FAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY COMMON AREAS,
INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOT, AND GOLF COURSES ARE
EXEMPT. (R)

3.1.14 A MINIMUM 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT MATURITY
(EXCLUDING HARDSCAPE AREAS) SHALL BE TREATED WITH
LIVING VEGETATION INCLUDING GROUNDCOVER, SHRUBS AND
TREES, AS WELL AS INORGANIC MATERIAL AND AN AUTOMATIC
IRRIGATION SYSTEM. (R)

3.1.15 IF ALLOWED BY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, THE PLACEMENT OF RECYCLING CONTAINERS IN A
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK OR REQUIRED LANDSCAPED
ISLAND SHALL NOT RESULT IN THE ELIMINATION OF ANY
REQUIRED TREES. (R)

(3.2) MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE AREAS.

3.2.1 NATIVE SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION SHALL NOT BE
PRUNED OR REMOVED FROM AREAS IDENTIFIED ON APPROVED
PLANS AS PERMANENT UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE UNLESS
DEMONSTRATED TO THE CITY THAT A HEALTH, SAFETY OR
WELFARE ISSUE EXISTS. THIS INCLUDES REMOVAL OF DEAD
TREES OR CACTI. (R)

3.2.3 A PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE
INSTALLED TO WATER ALL TREES, CACTI, AND PLANTS INSTALLED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS OR
OTHER DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DOCUMENTS TO MINIMIZE
MAINTENANCE AND WATER CONSUMPTION, AND TO MAXIMIZE
PLANT HEALTH, SURVIVABILITY, AND VIABILITY, UNLESS
OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. (R)

(3.4) ART/WATER ELEMENTS.

3.4.1 WATER FEATURES, INCLUDING FOUNTAINS, SHALL BE SITED
TO ALLOW SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT
PRIMARILY TO ON-SITE AND INCIDENTALLY TO OFF-SITE USERS
AND TO MINIMIZE WATER CONSUMPTION. (R)

3.4.2 IF THERE IS PUBLIC ART, IT SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
OVERALL DESIGN OF A PROJECT. (R)

4. OPEN SPACE/AMENITIES.




Page 406
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

(4.1) IMPROVED OPEN SPACES, PLAZAS AND COURTYARDS SHALL
BE SHADED A MINIMUM 50 PERCENT AND FUNCTIONAL IN TERMS
OF AREA, DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND AMENITIES TO PROMOTE
SAFE HUMAN INTERACTION. (R)

(4.2) USABLE PUBLIC SPACE SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM OF
50 PERCENT SHADING THROUGH THE USE OF TREES OR
STRUCTURES THAT PROVIDE SHADING, OR A COMBINATION OF
THE TWO UNLESS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SITE VISIBILITY
TRIANGLES OR OTHER TECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS. (R)

6. PARKING/CIRCULATION.

(6.1) SURFACE PARKING DESIGN.

6.1.3 PARKING AREAS SHALL BE BUFFERED FROM ADJACENT
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND SCREENED FROM STREETS SO
THAT CARS ARE NOT VISIBLE BELOW THE AVERAGE HEIGHT OF
THE HEADLIGHTS. (R)

6.1.7 SURFACE PARKING DESIGN SHALL UTILIZE SHARED ACCESS
DRIVES WITH ADJACENT, SIMILARLY ZONED PROPERTIES. (R)

6.1.9 EXCESSIVE ASPHALT/HARDSCAPE NOT NEEDED FOR
ADEQUATE VEHICULAR MANEUVERING OR PARKING, STAGING OR
MATERIAL STORAGE SHALL BE MINIMIZED. (R)

(6.2) PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN.

6.2.3 THE PARKING STRUCTURE EXTERIOR SHALL BE FINISHED
WITH ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND DETAILING THAT
WILL CREATE VISUAL INTEREST FOR ADJOINING PROPERTIES. (R)

6.2.4 LIGHTING WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL PROVIDE
SAFETY AND SECURITY AND BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER BOTH IN TERMS OF ILLUMINATION
AND FIXTURES. (R)

6.2.7 APPROPRIATE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES AND PEDESTRIAN
CROSSING AT EXITS AND ENTRANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL
PARKING STRUCTURES. (R)

6.2.10 THERE SHALL BE A CONVENIENT, CLEAR, SAFE AND
EFFICIENT INTERNAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM WITHIN THE PARKING
STRUCTURE FOR BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
INCLUDING APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE AND PLACEMENT OF




Page 407
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION CORES (ELEVATORS AND STAIRS). (R)

(6.3) ACCESS/CIRCULATION.

6.3.2 THE SITE PLAN SHALL CLEARLY EXPRESS THE SEPARATION
BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. (R)

7. WALLS/FENCING.

(7.1) WALLS ADJACENT TO ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS
SHALL HAVE A FINISHED APPEARANCE. UNTEXTURED,
UNFINISHED BLOCK AND REINFORCED, MORTAR-FREE CONCRETE
WALLS SHALL BE AVOIDED. (R)

(7.2) WALL LENGTHS EXCEEDING 50 FEET ADJACENT TO
ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS SHALL BE ARTICULATED OR
CONTAIN SUBSTANTIAL LANDSCAPING TO BREAK THE
CONTINUOUS WALL SURFACE AND CREATE VARYING SHADING
PATTERNS. (R)

8. SITE LIGHTING.

(8.1) ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO PREVENT
DIRECT VISIBILITY OF THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTY. (R)

(8.2) LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED WITH CUT-OFF FIXTURES AND
DEFLECTORS TO DIRECT LIGHT DOWNWARD AND LIMIT ON-SITE
LIGHTING LEVELS TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE (1) FOOT CANDLE AT
THE PROPERTY LINE. (R)

(8.5) SERVICE AREAS AND OTHER SCREENED AREAS SHALL HAVE
PROPER SECURITY LIGHTING. (R)

(8.6) LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ILLUMINATION SHALL BE OF
SIMILAR DESIGN AND CHARACTER AS THE PROJECT’S BUILDING
COMPONENTS. (R)

(8.7) SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE PERSONAL
SAFETY AT BUILDING ENTRANCE/EXITS, AND IN PUBLIC
ASSEMBLY AND PARKING AREAS. (R)

(8.8) RECOMMENDED LIGHTING LEVELS AND UNIFORMITY RATIOS
ESTABLISHED BY THE ILLUMINATION ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF
NORTH AMERICA (IESNA), AS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE CITY OF
PHOENIX, SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN LIGHTING DESIGN FOR ON-




Page 408
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

SITE NON-RESIDENTIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. (R)

B. BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION.

1. PLACEMENT/ORIENTATION.

(1.2) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT
THE ORIENTATION OF SURROUNDING BUILDINGS AND
SURROUNDING STREETS BY MAINTAINING CONTINUITY OF
PEDESTRIAN ROUTES AND PROMOTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR
PEDESTRIAN INTERACTION AT THE STREET LEVEL. (R)

(1.4) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT
CLIMATIC CONDITIONS BY MINIMIZING HEAT GAIN AND
CONSIDERING THE IMPACT OF SHADE ON ADJACENT LAND USES
AND AREAS. (R)

(1.5) NATURAL SURVEILLANCE SHALL BE MAXIMIZED IN PROJECT
DESIGN TO ENCOURAGE EASY OBSERVATION OF PEOPLE AND
PROPERTY NEAR ENTRYWAYS, PATHWAYS, PUBLIC SPACES AND
PARKING LOTS. (R)

(1.6) PROJECTS OR PORTIONS OF PROJECTS IN PUBLIC VIEW
(ADJACENT TO STREETS AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS) SHALL
DEMONSTRATE A GREATER LEVEL OF DESIGN SENSITIVITY AND
DETAIL TO VISUAL IMAGE THAN OTHER DEVELOPMENT. (R)

2. HEIGHT, BULK, AND AREA.

(2.2) PARAPET WALLS SHALL NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE
BUILDING HEIGHT MORE THAN FIVE FEET (5') FOR A BUILDING
THAT IS TWENTY FEET (20') OR LESS IN HEIGHT OR SEVEN FEET (7')
FOR A BUILDING ABOVE TWENTY FEET IN HEIGHT UNLESS
GREATER HEIGHT IS NEEDED TO SCREEN MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT. (R)

3. ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) ARCHITECTURE AND APPLIED TREATMENTS THAT EXPRESS
CORPORATE IDENTITY SHALL BE TEMPERED TO PROVIDE UNIQUE
STRUCTURES THAT COMPLIMENT AND BLEND WITH THEIR
IMMEDIATE CONTEXT. (R)

(3.2) PARKING SHADE AND CANOPY STRUCTURES SHALL BE
COMPLIMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE PRIMARY
BUILDINGS AND HAVE MINIMAL VISUAL IMPACT TO THE PUBLIC




Page 409
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

STREETSCAPE AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. (R)

4. ARTICULATION.

(4.1) BUILDING FACADES VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS AND
ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT EXCEED 100-FEET
SHALL CONTAIN ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND
DETAILING SUCH AS TEXTURAL CHANGES, PILASTERS, OFFSETS,
RECESSES, WINDOW FENESTRATION, SHADOW BOXES AND
OVERHEAD/CANOPIES. (R)

(4.2) THE BUILDING FACADE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A
SENSE OF HUMAN SCALE AT GROUND LEVEL BY PROVIDING A
CLEAR ARCHITECTURAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR
LEVELS AND ALL ADDITIONAL LEVELS. (R)

(4.3) BUILDING ENTRANCES SHALL BE IDENTIFIABLE AND
DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE FROM A PUBLIC SIDEWALK. (R)

5. COLORS/MATERIALS.

(5.1) ALL SIDES OF A STRUCTURE SHALL EXHIBIT DESIGN
CONTINUITY AND CONTAIN MULTIPLE EXTERIOR ACCENT
MATERIALS THAT EXHIBIT QUALITY AND DURABILITY. EXAMPLES
INCLUDE MATERIALS SUCH AS BRICK, STONE, COLORED
TEXTURED CONCRETE OR STUCCO. ROOF MATERIALS MAY
INCLUDE TREATED METAL, CONCRETE, AND CLAY TILES,
DECORATIVE WOOD, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS. (R)

(5.2) MULTIPLE BUILDINGS ON THE SAME SITE SHALL BORROW
AND INCORPORATE (NOT DUPLICATE) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES,
MATERIALS, FORMS, FEATURES, COLORS AND COMPATIBLE
ELEMENTS FROM THE SAME SITE. THESE SHALL INCLUDE:
CONTINUATION OF DISTINCTIVE ROOFLINES, COVERED WALKWAY
ALIGNMENTS, CONSISTENT DETAILING OF FINISH, ACCENT
FEATURES ON ALL VISIBLE SIDES OF STRUCTURES, COMPATIBLE
SHAPES, MATERIAL, WALL AND LANDSCAPING TREATMENT. (R)

(5.3) THE EXTENSIVE USE OF THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL
TREATMENTS AND DETAILS ARE STRONGLY DISCOURAGED AND
SHALL BE LIMITED IN THEIR PROPOSED APPLICATION:

- COLORED PLASTIC OR FIBERGLASS

- SHINY METAL DETAILS OR REFLECTIVE MATERIALS




Page 410
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language

- UNTEXTURED CONCRETE, UNFINISHED BLOCK, STEEL PANELS,
OR ASPHALT SHINGLES AS A PREDOMINANT EXTERIOR MATERIAL.
(R)

(5.4) CORPORATE COLORS, ASSOCIATED GRAPHICS, AND HIGHLY
CONTRASTING BANDS OF VIBRANT COLORS ON BUILDINGS AND
ON ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (EXCLUDING SIGNAGE) SHALL BE
USED AS AN ACCENT FEATURE WITH RESTRAINT AS A MINOR
ELEMENT OF THE BUILDING’S EXTERIOR. (R)

(5.5) PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC
STREETS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 30% OF
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COMPOSED OF ALTERNATIVE BUILDING
MATERIALS SUCH AS GLASS, BRICK, MASONRY, STONE AND
STUCCO. (R)

6. PUBLIC AMENITIES/ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

(6.1) PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND
GATHERING AREAS SHALL BE SHADED (MINIMUM 50 PERCENT AT
MATURITY) FOR THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF
PEDESTRIANS AND TO ENCOURAGE USE. (R)

(6.2) OVERHANGS AND CANOPIES SHALL BE INTEGRATED IN THE
BUILDING DESIGN ALONG ALL PEDESTRIAN THOROUGHFARES.
FOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTERS WITH EXTERIOR
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, CONTINUOUS SHADE PROTECTED
WALKWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED. (R)

(6.3) THERE SHALL BE CONVENIENT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS BETWEEN BUS STOP/SHELTER AND THE BUILDING
ENTRY AND/OR ACTIVITY AREA(S). (R)

7. SCREENING.

(7.1) SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED AWAY FROM PUBLIC
VIEW. (R)

(7.3) ALL SCREENING SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE
WITH THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. (R)

(7.5) ALL NEW OR RELOCATED ELECTRIC LINES 12 KV AND
SMALLER, COMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE TELEVISION AND ALL
ON PREMISE WIRING SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND IN ALL
DEVELOPMENTS WHERE VISIBLE FROM STREETS OR ADJOINING
PROPERTIES. (R)




Page 411
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES.

THE FOLLOWING ARE ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES APPLICABLE TO
ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SUPERBLOCK 3, USING THE SAME
IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS PER SECTION 507.C OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE:

1. A MAXIMUM OF 60% OF EXTERIOR BUILDING FACADES SHALL BE
FINISHED WITH STUCCO MATERIAL. (R)

2. LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE SIDEWALKS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE. (R)

3. LIGHTING SHOULD BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL MULTI-USE
TRAILS PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE. (P)

4. WHERE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS CROSS A VEHICULAR PATH, THE
PATHWAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DECORATIVE PAVERS,
STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR OTHER PAVEMENT
TREATMENTS, THAT VISUALLY CONTRASTS PARKING AND DRIVE
AISLE SURFACES. (R)

5. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE DECORATIVE
PAVERS, STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR SIMILAR
ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL. (R)

6. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE ENHANCED
LANDSCAPING ON BOTH SIDES WITHIN MINIMUM 250-SQUARE-
FOOT LANDSCAPE AREAS AND SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM
5-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN, PLANTED WITH A VARIETY OF
AT LEAST THREE PLANT MATERIALS, AND MINIMUM 2-INCH
CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT
SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS WITH THE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN. (R)

7. TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL SITE
ENTRIES AND EXITS TO SLOW DOWN VEHICULAR SPEEDS AS THEY
APPROACH SIDEWALKS. (R)

8. INTERIOR WALLS AND PRIVACY FENCING SHALL USE MATERIALS
AND COLORS THAT BLEND WITH THE NATURAL DESERT
ENVIRONMENT. (R)




Page 412
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


9. A COMBINATION OF VIEW WALLS/FENCING AND PARTIAL VIEW
WALLS/FENCING SHALL BE INCORPORATED ALONG PROPERTY
LINES ADJACENT TO DEDICATED PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN
SPACE AREAS, NATURAL AND/OR IMPROVED DRAINAGEWAYS OR
RECREATIONAL AREAS. (R)

10. DRAINAGE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO LOOK NATURAL IN
THE DESERT SETTING THROUGH COLOR, TEXTURE,
LANDSCAPING, OR OTHER MEANS. (R)

11. ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED AT ALL PUBLIC STREET CROSSING LOCATIONS TO
INTERCONNECT THE PEDESTRIAN TRAILS THROUGHOUT THE
ENTIRETY OF THE SITE. (R)

12. WASTE STATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE A COMPOST RECEPTACLE
WHENEVER POSSIBLE, WITH INFORMATIONAL SIGNS INDICATING
WHAT TYPE OF WASTE SHOULD GO IN WHICH RECEPTACLE. (P)

***

Amend Appendices A.2 (Plant Lists), Page A-2 as follows:

***

A.2 Plant Lists

The Staff Recommended Plant List was prepared by the City of Phoenix Planning
Department staff with assistance from the staff botanist/horticulturalist in the Water
Conservation and Resources Division of the Water and Wastewater Department. The
list includes a combination of native and introduced plants that are suitable to the
Sonoran Desert. Suitability includes drought tolerance and mature height similar to
Sonoran Desert vegetation. These plants were also selected for their adaptability to the
climatic conditions, lower winter nighttime temperatures and more frequent frosts in
Area C.

A Supplemental Plant List is included which identifies six specific development areas in
the Desert Ridge project. In each of the six development areas, additional plant
materials are listed that can be used to supplement the recommended plant list.
Compliance with the Desert Ridge Plant List and the Supplemental Plant List will be
enforced by the Desert Ridge Review Board. Tall palm trees (i.e., Date Palm, Fan Palm,
Mexican Blue Palm) shall be located only in the Village Core, and resort areas;,
SUPERBLOCK 3 DEVELOPMENT PARCELS, AND parcels 4RH and 5A.

***




Page 413
GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 – Proposed Amendment Language


Amend Appendices A.2 (Plant Lists. Supplemental Plant List), Page A-9 as
follows:

***

SUPERBLOCK 3

PALMS

DATE PALMS

TREES

HERITAGE LIVE OAK
EVERGREEN ELM
RED PUSH PISTACHE

***




Page 414
ATTACHMENT F


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
October 5, 2023

ITEM NO: 2
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 (Related Case Z-4-23-2) (Continued from June 1,
2023; August 3, 2023; and September 7, 2023)
Location: Generally located south of the 101 Freeway, east of 56th Street, west
of 64th Street, and north of the Reach 11
Acreage: 417.63
Proposal: Amend the DRSP text for Development Parcels 3.CP/BP.1 and
3.CP/BP.2 to facilitate the Mayo Clinic expansion including integrated
clinical practice, education, and research, as well as the creation of a
new “Discovery Oasis” biotech and healthcare corridor.
Applicant: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Owner: ASLD and Mayo Clinic Arizona
Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in Exhibit A
(Addendum A).

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 4/4/2023 Information only.
Desert View 5/2/2023 Continued. Vote: 9-0.
Desert View 6/6/2023 Continued. Vote: 10-0.
Desert View 8/1/2023 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 10-1.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum A Staff Report.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Gorraiz made a MOTION to approve GPA-DSTV-1-23-2, per the
Addendum A Staff Report.

Maker: Gorraiz
Second: Boyd
Vote: 6-0-1 (Conflict: Simon)
Absent: Gaynor and Mangum
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposed amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan will reinforce Superblock
3 as a future destination for investment within the Loop 101 employment corridor.

2. The proposal updates permitted uses and development standards to allow the
development of a medical campus with enhanced design guidelines.



Page 415
3. The subject site is appropriate for additional height and floor area, as it is strategically
located near a freeway and undeveloped land, away from single-family residential
uses.

Proposed Language:

Amend Chapter 6 (Development Parcel Regulations), Section C.4.D (Non-Core Parcel
Regulations, Modified City of Phoenix Commerce Park/Business Park Regulations Imposed by
Desert Ridge Specific Plan), Pages 6-10 to 6-11 as follows:

***

Site Plan Requirement

1. A site plan is required for all CP/BP development parcels.

Design Standards

1. All parcels, EXCEPT AS NOTED.

a. Building Height/Setback Relationship: Height is limited to 18 feet within 30 feet of
lot lines, with one additional foot of height for every additional foot of setback to the
otherwise permitted maximum height. DEVELOPMENT PARCELS IN
SUPERBLOCK 3 ARE EXEMPT.

b. Required Parking Lot and Wall Setbacks:

1) Tatum Boulevard, 56th Street, 64th Street and Avenue K MAYO
BOULEVARD (FORMERLY AVENUE K): 50 feet minimum from street
right-of-way.

2) 52nd Street, Pima Freeway, and all other streets: 30 feet minimum from
right-of-way, EXCEPT FOR THE PORTION OF PIMA FREEWAY WHICH
ABUTS SUPERBLOCK 3 SHALL BE 10 FEET MINIMUM FROM RIGHT-
OF-WAY.

3) All other lot lines except lot lines which abut Reach 11: Parking lots must
be 10 feet minimum from all lot lines; there is no minimum setback from lot
lines for walls. NO MINIMUM SETBACK FOR SUPERBLOCK 3 PARCELS.

c. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be required in all street rights-of-way, building and
parking lot setback area, parking areas and open space areas pursuant to City of
Phoenix requirements, except that a minimum of 25% of the required trees shall
be 24-inch box or larger.

d. Walls and Fences: Walls and fences located within or adjacent to a building or
parking lot setback which is adjacent to Tatum Boulevard, 56th Street, 64th Street,
MAYO BOULEVARD (FORMELY AVENUE K), and 52nd Street shall not exceed
eight feet in height. Walls and fences adjacent to all other streets and interior and
perimeter lot lines shall not exceed eight feet in height.

e. Screening: Loading, service, storage, delivery, refuse collection and parking area
must be screened with landscaping, walls or berming (or combinations thereof) so
as to be non-visible when standing six feet in height on the boundary lines of
Page 416
adjacent streets and properties. Rooftop treatment shall screen exposure of pipes
and mechanical equipment from view so as to be non-visible when standing six
feet in height on the boundary lines of adjacent streets and properties. Exhaust
stacks are exempt from these screening requirements.

2. Developments Abutting Reach 11: Reach 11 will be developed as a regional recreational
area with a variety of facilities which will provide active and passive recreational
opportunities. Development adjacent to Reach 11 should be encouraged to consider the
recreational facilities as site amenities that have the long term potential to enhance
adjacent land uses. Where a development abuts Reach 11, the following standards shall
apply:

a. Setbacks and Building Height: Buildings shall be set back an average of 100 feet
from the Reach 11 property line. If any portion of a building is over 56 feet in height,
the setback for the portion of the building shall be increased one foot for every one
foot of height over 56 feet, up to the maximum permitted height. The first 60 feet
of setback from Reach 11 shall remain as a buffer of open space with native-plant
landscaping. Parking and walls may be placed with a maximum of 50% of the
balance of the setback area. Any buildings with window treatments, architectural
facades/building designs, landscape designs, etc., which focus on Reach 11 may
reduce the required average setback to 60 feet, as approved by the PLANNING
AND Development Services Department. DEVELOPMENT PARCELS IN
SUPERBLOCK 3 ARE EXEMPT, EXCEPT THAT A MINIMUM 65-FOOT
SETBACK SHALL BE REQUIRED FROM REACH 11 REGARDLESS OF
BUILDING HEIGHT.

b. Fencing: If fencing is used at the perimeter of the property or within the required
setback as permitted in the immediately preceding paragraph, it should be view
fencing or an acceptable substitute as permitted by the PLANNING AND
Development Services Department, and Parks AND Recreation DEPARTMENT,
and Library Department. Chain link fencing is prohibited, except where used within
the interior of the site and only where it is not visible from the exterior property
boundaries, as approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services
Department.

c. Building Architecture/Screening: All building evaluations ELEVATIONS shall
include a mix of building material, vertical and horizontal elements around the
entire building, and shall maintain a campus continuity. Loading, service, storage,
deliver, refuse collection and parking areas which face Reach 11 must be screened
from view. Rooftop treatment shall screen exposure of pipes and mechanical
equipment form view of Reach 11. Exhaust stacks are exempt from these
screening requirements.

***

Amend Chapter 6 (Development Parcel Regulations), Section C.5. (Development Regulations
by Superblock), Pages 6-18 to 6-24 as follows:

***

SUPERBLOCK 3

Superblock 3 is located south of the Pima Freeway, between 56th Street, 64th Street and Reach
11. This superblock is an area designated for medically-related commerce park economic
Page 417
development efforts. The uses, zoning, and development standards, AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
included in this amendment are specifically intended to address these issues SUPPORT SUCH
USES.

3.CP/BP.1 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1

Size: 210 186.18 162.30 acres
Uses Permitted: Permitted uses shall be as indicated in Section 626, Commerce Park
District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance (Supp. dated
4/19/95) (Ref. Appendix A.7), as modified below.

Potential APPLICABLE Zoning to Be Applied: CP/BP as per Section 626 of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance as modified below and per Section C.4.D of this chapter. This
zoning is to be WAS applied upon City Council approval of the 1995 Major Amendment to
the Desert Ridge Specific Plan relating to this superblock.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: THE FOLLOWING SECTION HAS A REGULATORY
FRAMEWORK THAT INCLUDES A “BASE” SECTION AND AN “ENHANCED” SECTION.
THE “BASE” SECTION INCLUDES PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS THAT ARE ALLOWED BY RIGHT WITHOUT TRIGGERING ANY
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THE “ENHANCED” SECTION INCLUDES
ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT ARE
ONLY ALLOWED TO BE USED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS
LISTED IN THIS SECTION FURTHER BELOW.

Special Conditions and Requirements I. BASE PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS:

1. Commerce Park uses are allowed subject to the standards described in Section
C.4.D of this chapter.

2. 1. Additional Permitted Uses/Development Conditions: The following is a list of
modifications to the permitted uses included in Section 626, Commerce Park
District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance which
shall apply exclusively to Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1:

a. Manufacturing related to medical, pharmaceutical and biotechnical
products or equipment. Manufacturing shall include the fabrication and
assembly of finished products or sub-assemblies, so long as the primary
use of the property is not the basic processing and compounding of raw
materials or food products.

COMMERCE PARK (BUSINESS PARK OPTION) USES, SUBJECT TO
THE STANDARDS DESCRIBED IN SECTION C.4.D OF THIS CHAPTER.

b. Multiple MULTIfamily attached residential. uses at a minimum density of
17.0 dwelling units per gross acre.

c. B. Retail uses. The maximum gross leasable area for any one tenant/user
shall be 5,000 square feet. The maximum aggregate gross leasable area
of retail uses in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1 shall be 50,000 square
feet.



Page 418
NON-RESIDENTIAL USES PERMITTED PER SECTION 622,
COMMERCIAL C-1 DISTRICT, OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:

1) SUCH USES ARE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 5% OF THE NET
AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 500,000 SQUARE
FEET IN GROSS FLOOR AREA.

2) OF THE 5% OF THE NET AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL, 50% OF SUCH USES ARE LIMITED TO BEING
INTERNAL TO A BUILDING (NOT STAND-ALONE USES).

32) THE MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR ANY ONE TENANT
OR USER SHALL NOT EXCEED 10,000 SQUARE FEET.

4) EACH NEW DEVELOPMENT SHALL UPDATE THE MAYO
CLINIC MASTER SITE PLAN TO TRACK THESE
PERCENTAGES.

C.D. MEDICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOTECHNICAL PRODUCTS OR
EQUIPMENT, MANUFACTURING

2. MAXIMUM DENSITY: 200 DWELLING UNITS.

3. 2. Building Setbacks: Buildings must be setback a minimum of 100 feet and an
average of 125 feet from 56th Street, 64th Street and Avenue K. Buildings must
be setback 50 feet from all other streets, and the Pima Freeway. Buildings must
be setback 30 feet from all other lot lines.

A. ADJACENT TO MAYO BOULEVARD, 56TH STREET AND 64TH STREET:
MINIMUM 100 FEET, AVERAGE OF 125 FEET

B. ALL OTHER PUBLIC STREETS: MINIMUM 50 FEET

C. PRIVATE STREETS: MINIMUM 25 FEET

D. INTERIOR LOT LINES: 0 FEET

E. ADJACENT TO REACH 11: PER SECTION C.4.D, DESIGN STANDARDS
2.A, OF THIS CHAPTER.

4. 3. Floor Area Ratio: 0.20 overall limit for development parcel; individual
developments may be up to 0.25.

4. 5. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 56 FEET. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS ARE
EXCLUSIVE OF (DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL FACILITIES ON TOP
OF BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE
MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHTS SPECIFIED BELOW TO ACCOUNT FOR THESE
MECHANICAL FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED SCREENING.

5. LOT COVERAGE: MAXIMUM 50% FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

6. COMMON OPEN SPACE: MINIMUM 10% OF GROSS DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
AREA, ALLOCATED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL AREA.
Page 419
7. STREET STANDARDS:

A. MAYO BOULEVARD CROSS SECTION: THE 24-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE MEDIAN ALONG MAYO BOULEVARD MAY BE REDUCED
TO ALLOW FOR WIDENED AND BUFFERED BIKE LANES, AS
APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.
LANDSCAPE MEDIANS SHALL BE PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS
CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE PATH EASEMENTS:
SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE PATH EASEMENTS
SHALL BE DEDICATED WHERE NECESSARY TO PERMIT DETACHED
SIDEWALKS AND SHARED-USE PATHS, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. MAYO BOULEVARD (NORTH SIDE): A DETACHED SIDEWALK
SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP
LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD,
PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER
SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED
WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

D. MAYO BOULEVARD (SOUTH SIDE): WITH RESPECT TO
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND
SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF
MAYO BOULEVARD, EXCEPT WHERE THERE ARE EXISTING
SIDEWALKS, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE
STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND
MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

E. 56TH STREET (SOUTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): THE EXISTING
LANDSCAPE STRIP ON THE EAST SIDE OF 56TH STREET ADJACENT
TO THE DETACHED SIDEWALK SHALL BE REPLENISHED AND
PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER
SECTION 8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

FE. 56TH STREET (NORTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): A MINIMUM 10-
FOOT-WIDE DETACHED SIDEWALK, WHICH MAY BE LOCATED
WITHIN AN EASEMENT, SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND
SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF
56TH STREET, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE
STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND


Page 420
MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

GF. 64TH STREET: A DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM
10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK
OF CURB AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE
WEST SIDE OF 64TH STREET, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS
CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

HG. PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LOCAL STREETS: MINIMUM 5-FOOT-WIDE
DETACHED SIDEWALKS SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 5-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE STRIPS LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND
SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR PRIVATE AND PUBLIC
LOCAL STREETS, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE
STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.1 OF THIS CHAPTER AND
MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

IH. SHARED-USE PATH ON NORTH SIDE OF MAYO BOULEVARD: A
MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH EASEMENT (SUPE)
SHALL BE DEDICATED AND A MINIMUM 12-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-
USE PATH (SUP) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE SUP MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF THE
REQUIRED DETACHED SIDEWALK WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IF
THE LANDSCAPE STRIP IS PROVIDED PER SECTION 7.C OF THIS
CHAPTER.

J. SHARED-USE PATH ON WEST SIDE OF 64TH STREET: SUBJECT TO
ANY APPLICABLE ADOT STANDARDS NORTH OF MAYO
BOULEVARD, A 10-FOOT-WIDE SHARED-USE PATH EASEMENT
(SUPE) SHALL BE DEDICATED AND A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE
SHARED-USE PATH (SUP) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE
EASEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL
DETAIL AND AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE SUP MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU
OF THE REQUIRED DETACHED SIDEWALK WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-
WAY IF THE LANDSCAPE STRIP IS PROVIDED PER SECTION 7.GF OF
THIS CHAPTER.

K. MULTI-USE TRAIL CONNECTING TO REACH 11: A 10-FOOT-WIDE
MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE) SHALL BE DEDICATED WITHIN
THE EASTERN EDGE OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, AND A
MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT TO CONNECT SOUTH TO
REACH 11 TRAILS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG
SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

LK. LANDSCAPE STRIP REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION: IN AREAS
WHERE DRAINAGE CULVERTS, RIGHT TURN LANES AND BUS BAYS
Page 421
OCCUR AND LIMIT AVAILABLE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE REQUIRED
LANDSCAPE STRIPS OF THIS SECTION MAY BE REDUCED OR
ELIMINATED BY THE STREET TRANSPORATION DEPARTMENT TO
ENSURE SIDEWALKS AND SHARED USE PATHWAYS MAY BE
PROVIDED IN SUCH AREAS WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT OFFSET.

8. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS:

A. MILKWEED OR NATIVE NECTAR SPECIES FOR MONARCH
BUTTERFLIES: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE REQUIRED SHRUBS
SHALL BE A MILKWEED OR OTHER NATIVE NECTAR SPECIES AND
SHALL BE PLANTED IN GROUPS OF THREE OR MORE, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS:

1) ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS AND REACH
11: 25 FEET

2) ADJACENT TO PIMA FREEWAY: 10 FEET

3) ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
DEVELOPMENT WITH NO SHARED PARKING OR SHARED
DRIVEWAY: 5 FEET

4) ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO
DEVELOPMENT WITH SHARED PARKING OR SHARED
DRIVEWAY: 0 FEET

C. PARKING LOT AREAS: MINIMUM 10% OF INTERIOR SURFACE AREA,
EXCLUSIVE OF PERIMTER LANDSCAPING AND ALL REQUIRED
SETBACKS.

D. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE PLANTING STANDARDS:

1) STREETSCAPE:

A) TREES FOR 10-FOOT-WIDE OR WIDER LANDSCAPE
STRIPS: MINIMUM 3-INCH CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK
LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES
PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS.

B) TREES FOR 5-FOOT-WIDE, LESS THAN 10-FOOT-WIDE,
LANDSCAPE STRIPS: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER
SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE CANOPY DROUGHT-
TOLERANT SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON
CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

C) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS,
ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS
MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO
ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF 75% LIVE COVERAGE AT
MATURITY.
Page 422
D) UTILITY CONFLICTS: WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS
EXIST, THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON AN
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN SOLUTION CONSISTENT WITH
A PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT.

2) LANDSCAPE SETBACKS:

A) TREES FOR 10-FOOT OR WIDER LANDSCAPE
SETBACKS: MINIMUM 50% 2-INCH CALIPER, 25% 3-
INCH CALIPER AND 25% 4-INCH CALIPER LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES
PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS.

B) TREES FOR LESS THAN 10-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE
SETBACKS: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES
PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT
GROUPINGS.

C) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS,
ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS TO
ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF 50% LIVE COVERAGE AT
MATURITY.

3) UNCOVERED PARKING AREAS:

A) TREES: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER LARGE CANOPY
DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES DISPERSED
THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREA TO ACHIEVE
MINIMUM SHADING REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 13
3.CP/BP.1.I.11.E OF THIS CHAPTER.

B) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS,
ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS
MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO
ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF 50% LIVE COVERAGE AT
MATURITY.

4) COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RETENTION AREAS:

A) TREES: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER LARGE CANOPY
DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES DISPERSED
THROUGHOUT THE PARKING AREA TO ACHIEVE
MINIMUM SHADING REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 13
OF THIS CHAPTER PLANTED 20 FEET ON CENTER OR
IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS ALONG THE PERIMETER
OF OPEN SPACE AND RETENETION AREAS.

B) LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS,
ACCENTS AND VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS
MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO
Page 423
ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF 50% LIVE COVERAGE AT
MATURITY.

9. VEHICULAR PARKING: OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WHEN SUPPORTED BY AN
APPROPRIATELY DOCUMENTED STUDY.

A. EV INSTALLED SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE REQUIRED
PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING STRUCTURES,
SHALL BE ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) INSTALLED SPACES, DEFINED
AS A PARKING SPACE THAT INCLUDES ACCESS TO AN EV
CHARGER, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

B. EV CAPABLE SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE REQUIRED
PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING STRUCTURES,
SHALL BE EV CAPABLE SPACES, DEFINED AS A PARKING SPACE
THAT INCLUDES ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL WIRING TO ALLOW FOR
A FUTURE JUNCTION BOX AND APPROPRIATE VOLTAGE FOR AN
OUTLET CAPABLE OF CHARGING A VEHICLE, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

10. BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE:

A. BUFFERED AND WIDENED BIKE LANES: EXISTING BIKE LANES
SHOULD BE WIDENED AND SHALL BE BUFFERED ON BOTH SIDES
OF MAYO BOULEVARD, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. ON-SITE BICYCLE CIRCULATION: BIKE LANES, BIKE BOULEVARDS,
OR OTHER DESIGN STANDARDS TO MAXIMIZE BICYCLIST
VISIBILITY, SAFETY AND BICYCLIST CIRCULATION ON SITE
THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL BE PROVIDED
AND INSTALLED PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE BICYCLE &
PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDANCE ELEMENT, CHAPTER 3 (BICYCLE
TOOLBOX), OF THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

C. BICYCLE PARKING: BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED PER
THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H.6 OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE, IN ADDITION TO THE FOLLOWING SECURED
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AT A
MINIMUM RATE OF 0.25 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT AND GUEST
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL AT A
MINIMUM RATE OF 0.05 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT. NON-
SECURED BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH
INVERTED U AND ARTISTIC RACKS LOCATED NEAR ALL BUILDING
ENTRANCES, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BELOW AND OPEN
SPACE AREAS, AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF
SECTION 1307.H OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE.


Page 424
1) MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL SHALL PROVIDE SECURED
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.25
SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT AND GUEST BICYCLE
PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.05 SPACES PER
DWELLING UNIT.

2) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL PROVIDE
BICYCLE PARKING LOCATED IN COMMON OPEN SPACE
AREAS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.05 SPACES PER DWELLING
UNIT.

D. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS: BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS (“FIX IT
STATIONS”) SHALL BE PROVIDED, MAINTAINED AND EVENLY
DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL AND
SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS,
SHARED-USE PATHS AND MULTI-USE TRAILS, SPACED A MINIMUM
OF A QUARTER MILE APART. THE BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS (“FIX
IT STATIONS”) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AN AREA OF HIGH VISIBILITY
AND SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR MANEUVERING AREAS,
WHERE APPLICABLE. THE REPAIR STATION SHALL INCLUDE, BUT
NOT BE LIMITED TO:

1) STANDARD REPAIR TOOLS AFFIXED TO THE STATION.

2) A TIRE GAUGE AND PUMP AFFIXED TO THE BASE OF THE
STATION OR THE GROUND.

3) A BICYCLE REPAIR STAND WHICH ALLOWS PEDALS AND
WHEELS TO SPIN FREELY WHILE MAKING ADJUSTMENTS
TO THE BIKE.

E. ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE
REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL INCLUDE STANDARD
ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES, OR STANDARD ELECTRICAL OUTLETS
FOR SECURED BICYCLE PARKING, FOR ELECTRIC BICYCLE
CHARGING CAPABILITIES.

11. SHADE STANDARDS:

A. SHADE CALCULATIONS AND SHADE STUDY: SHADE CALCULATIONS
SHALL BE BASED ON THE SUMMER SOLSTICE AT NOON, AS SHOWN
ON A SHADING STUDY TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SOURCE OF SHADE: SHADE SHALL BE FROM A STRUCTURE,
LANDSCAPING AT MATURITY, OR A COMBINATION OF THE TWO,
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

C. PUBLIC SIDEWALKS AND SHARED-USE PATHS: MINIMUM 75%

D. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS: MINIMUM 50%

E. UNCOVERED PARKING AREAS: MINIMUM 25%, SHADED PER
SECTION 3.CP/BP.1.I.8.D.3.A OF THIS CHAPTER.
Page 425
F. OCCUPIABLE ROOF AREAS: MINIMUM 50%

G. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS AND BICYCLE PARKING SPACES:
MINIMUM 75%

H. BIKE LANES: MINIMUM 50%

I. CORNERS OF TRAFFIC LIGHTS: MINIMUM 75%, TO ALLOW
PEDESTRIANS TO WAIT COMFORTABLY FOR THE SIGNAL TO
CHANGE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. ALL SHADE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-
WAY SHALL REQUIRE A REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR ENCROACHMENT
IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SHALL COMPLY WITH VISIBILITY
TRIANGLES.

12. GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE: EACH PROJECT WITHIN THE
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL IMPLEMENT A MINIMUM OF TWO GREEN
INFRASTRUCTURE (GI) TECHNIQUES FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT,
PER THE GREATER PHOENIX METRO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND LOW
IMPACT DEVELOPMENT DETAILS FOR ALTERNATIVE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT, AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

13. WASTE STATIONS: WASTE STATIONS INCLUDING A LANDFILL
RECEPTACLE AND RECYCLING RECEPTACLE WITH INFORMATIONAL
SIGNS INDICATING WHAT TYPE OF WASTE SHOULD GO IN WHICH
RECEPTACLE SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES/EXITS
(EXCEPT FOR EMERGENCY ONLY EXITS) AND SHALL BE ALLOCATED
THROUGHOUT THE SITE IN COMMON OPEN SPACE ARES AND ALONG
SIDEWALKS, SHARED-USE PATHS AND PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AT
CONVENIENT LOCATIONS, TYPICALLY WITHIN A QUARTER MILE OF EACH
OTHER. ADDITIONALLY, RECYCLING CONTAINERS SHALL BE PROVIDED
FOR EACH GARBAGE CONTAINER PROVIDED.

14. SIGNAGE: THIS DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS EXEMPTED FROM THE DESERT
RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN IF A SEPARATE COMPREHNESIVE
SIGN PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS APPROVED.

15. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A LOT ADJACENT TO (WITHIN 100 FEET
OF) THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY: IN THE EVENT THAT RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT OCCURS NEAR THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY, THE
FOLLOWING STANDARDS SHALL APPLY:

A. INDOOR NOISE LEVELS OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL NOT
EXCEED A DECIBEL DAY NIGHTLEVEL (DNL) OF 45 DECIBELS, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
A SEALED AND SIGNED ANALYSIS BY AN ENGINEER LICENSED IN
ARIZONA WITH A PROFICIENCY IN RESIDENTIAL SOUND
MITIGATION OR NOISE CONTROL SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE
BUILDING PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PHOENIX BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION CODE COMPLIANCE REVIEW TO THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEER SHALL NOTE IN


Page 426
THE ANALYSIS THAT THE BUILDING DESIGN IS CAPABLE OF
ACHIEVING THE REQUIRED NOISE LEVEL REDUCTION.

B. NOISE MITIGATION WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE
NORTH SIDE OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 ADJACENT TO
THE LOOP 101 FREEWAY. THE WALL HEIGHT SHALL BE
DETERMINED THROUGH A NOISE ANALYSIS PREPARED BY A
REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. THE WALL SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED OF MINIMUM 8-INCH-THICK CONCRETE MASONRY
UNITS (CMU) OR OF CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE AND CONTAIN NO
OPENINGS UNLESS THEY ARE ABOVE THE MINIMUM HEIGHT
REQUIRED FOR ADEQUATE NOISE MITIGATION OR FOR DRAINAGE.
NOISE WALLS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO WRAP AROUND
CORNER LOTS AND AREAS NEAR INTERSECTIONS. WRAP AROUND
WALLS, UPON TURNING A CORNER, SHALL CONTINUE FOR AT
LEAST 120 FEET (APPROXIMATELY TWO LOT WIDTHS), AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

C. NOISE WALLS SHALL VARY BY A MINIMUM OF FOUR FEET EVERY
400 LINEAL FEET TO VISUALLY REFLECT A MEANDERING OR
STAGGERED SETBACK, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

D. THE NOISE WALL, SHALL INCORPORATE STONE VENEER,
STONEWORK, OR INTEGRAL COLOR CMU BLOCK, AS APPROVED
BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

E. THE DEVELOPER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT DISCLOSE TO
PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS AND RENTERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN
THE DEVELOPMENT THE EXISTENCE OF NOISE FROM THE LOOP
101 FREEWAY. THE FORM AND CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS
SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO
RECORDATION.

16. MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS, PER THE
REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 4 OF THIS PLAN, AND PER THE PLANNED
COMMUNITY DISTRICT (PCD), SECTION 636 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE, SHALL BE SUBMITTED, AND SHALL BE UPDATED WITH EACH
PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. IN ADDITION, THE INITIAL MASTER PLANS SUBMITTED BY
THE MASTER DEVELOPER SHALL ALSO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

A. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF DETACHED SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE
WITHIN LANDSCAPE STRIPS, BUFFERED BIKE LANES, AND
SHARED-USE PATHS ALONG 56TH STREET, MAYO BOULEVARD
AND 64TH STREET PER SECTION 7 OF THIS CHAPTER, TO BE
INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE
AND TRAILS PLAN AND MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN.

B. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS PER
SECTION 10.C 3.CP/BP.1.I.10.D OF THIS CHAPTER, TO BE INCLUDED
ON THE MASTER OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRAILS
PLAN.
Page 427
C. A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION PLAN TO INCLUDE
INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION ON SITE THAT
ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST CONVENIENCE, SAFETY
AND COMFORT, WITH A FOCUS ON CONNECTING THE EAST AND
WEST SIDES OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 NORTH OF
MAYO BOULEVARD.

17. ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT:

A. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL STREETS WITHIN AND
ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT WITH PAVING, CURB, GUTTER,
SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, STREETLIGHTS, MEDIAN ISLANDS,
LANDSCAPING, AND OTHER INCIDENTALS, AS PER PLANS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL ADA ACCESSIBILITY
STANDARDS.

B. A RED BORDER LETTER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARIZONA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ADOT) FOR THIS
DEVELOPMENT.

C. THIS PARCEL IS IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA) CALLED
ZONE AO, ON PANEL 1315 L OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS
(FIRM) DATED JANUARY 4, 2021. THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS
SHALL APPLY, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:

1) THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER IS REQUIRED TO SHOW THE
FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS ON THE GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN AND ENSURE THAT IMPACTS TO THE
PROPOSED FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED,
FOLLOWING THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
(NFIP) REGULATIONS (44 CFR PARAGRAPH 60.3). THIS
INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED TO PROVISIONS IN THE LATEST
VERSIONS OF THE FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE OF THE
PHOENIX CITY CODE.

2) A COPY OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO THE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT SECTION
OF THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS.

3) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT FOR
APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PERMITS.

4) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON BUILDINGS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND A MINIMUM 95% COMPACTION
TEST RESULTS FOR THE BUILDING PADS TO FLOODPLAIN


Page 428
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
BUILDING PERMITS.

5) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE
(FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON FINISHED CONSTRUCTION
TO FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

D. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT
DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE AND OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
OF THE SCOTTSDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (SDL) TO FUTURE
OWNERS OR TENANTS OF THE PROPERTY. THE FORM AND
CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE
TEMPLATES AND INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED WHICH HAVE BEEN
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.

E. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A NO HAZARD DETERMINATION
FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THAT EXCEEDS 70 FEET IN
HEIGHT FROM THE FAA PURSUANT TO THE FAA’S FORM-7460
OBSTRUCTION ANALYSIS REVIEW PROCESS, PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL, AS PER PLANS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

F. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX ARCHAEOLOGY
OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE I DATA TESTING
AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING,
LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR GRADING APPROVAL.

G. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON REVIEW OF
THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING, THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A QUALIFIED
ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA RECOVERY
EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT
PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.

H. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED
DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER SHALL IMMEDIATELY
CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT
RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY, NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST,
AND ALLOW TIME FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY
ASSESS THE MATERIALS.

I. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM.
THE WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

II. CONDITIONS FOR ENHANCED PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS:



Page 429
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 CAN UTILIZE THE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS OF THIS SUBSECTION ONLY UPON THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS
BEING APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY:

1. BEFORE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR ANY
INDIVIDUAL BUILDING, PROJECT, OR USE BY THE CITY WITHIN THE
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL, A CONCEPTUAL MASTER DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL SITE PLAN (CMDPSP) FOR THE ENTIRETY OF SUPERBLOCK 3 AND
THE MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR CITY APPROVAL.
THIS MEANS, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT BEFORE ANY PLANS FOR ANY
INDIVIDUAL BUILDING, PROJECT, OR USE WITHIN PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 ARE
PROCESSED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY, A CMDPSP FOR THE ENTIRETY
OF SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE MUST BE FILED WITH
THE CITY. THE CITY WILL THEN PROCESS THE CMDPSP THROUGH A
STAFF APPROVAL PROCESS. AT A MINIMUM THE CMDPSP SHALL PROVIDE
INFORMATION REGARDING THE FOLLOWING:

A. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT UNIT BOUNDARIES WITHIN THE
SUPERBLOCK.

B. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) CALCULATIONS FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL
DEVELOPMENT UNIT AND THE ENTIRE SUPER BLOCK AND MAYO
CLINIC PUD AREA.

C. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHTS.

D. PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS.

E. LAND USE FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT UNIT.

2. FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT UNITS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL, THE
INITIAL APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLANS FOR THE
ENTIRE SUPERBLOCK AND MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE, AS DESCRIBED IN THE
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (PCD) SECTION OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE, AND AS FURTHER CLARIFIED IN THIS SECTION. THE
INITIAL DEVELOPER WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL WILL BE
REQUIRED TO IDENTIFY THE REGIONAL ROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENTS NECESSARY TO SERVE THE ENTIRE DESERT RIDGE
SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT AREA WITH ASSIGNMENT OF
CONTRIBUTION FUNDS AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO EACH
DEVELOPMENT UNIT WITHIN SUPERBLOCK 3 AND THE MAYO CLINIC PUD,
WHICH SHALL INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO:

A. 64TH STREET CONNECTION TO BELL ROAD.

B. ULTIMATE MAYO BOULEVARD FROM TATUM BOULEVARD TO 66TH
STREET.

C. TATUM BOULEVARD FROM PINNACLE PEAK ROAD TO THE SOUTH
SIDE OF THE CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT (CAP) CANAL BRIDGE.

D. 56TH STREET FROM RANGER DRIVE TO PINNACLE PEAK ROAD,
AND OTHER AFFECTED CORRIDORS.


Page 430
E. 64TH STREET FROM LOOP 101 FREEWAY TO PINNACLE PEAK
ROAD.

ANY SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT UNITS CREATED WITHIN A
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SEEKING AMENDMENT TO THE OVERALL
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MASTER PLANS, SHALL BE
REQUIRED TO SUBMIT REVISED DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MASTER PLANS
AND OBTAIN CITY APPROVAL TO AMEND, ASSIGN OR PHASE ANY
IMPROVEMENTS ASSIGNED TO THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

3. A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR
THE ENTIRE SUPERBLOCK 3 AND MAYO CLINIC PUD SITE TO SUPPORT
THE CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLANS AS DETERMINED BY
THE CITY OF PHOENIX STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. NO
PRELIMINARY PLANS WITHIN A DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL BE
SUBMITTED UNTIL THE STUDY IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY
OF PHOENIX STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. THE DEVELOPER
SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TIS SUBMISSION TO AND
COORDINATING TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLANS
AND IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (ADOT).

4. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE DEVELOPER SHALL
HAVE EXECUTED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLANS AND A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX THAT DETAILS
FUNDING OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS FOR CODE REQUIRED AND
REGIONAL STREET, WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE
FOR EACH DEVELOPMENT UNIT, AS REQUIRED BY THE APPROVED
MASTER PLANS RELATED TO THAT DEVELOPMENT UNIT.

III. ENHANCED PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

1. ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES: UPON COMPLIANCE OF THE CONDITIONS
LISTED IN THE SECTION ABOVE, IN ADDITION TO THE BASE PERMITTED USES
IN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE
PERMITTED:

A. MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PER R-5 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OPTION,
SECTION 615 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE

B. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ATTACHED OR DETACHED, PER R-3
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT OPTION, SECTION 613 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE

CA. COMMUNITY RESIDENCE CENTER OR HOME

D. BIOMEDICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH OFFICES AND/OR
LABORATORY

EB. HOSPICE



Page 431
FC. MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND ASSOCIATED DORMITORIES AND
MEDICALLY RELATED EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES

GD. MOBILE FOOD VENDING AS AN ACCESSORY USE, SUBJET TO THE
FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:

1) SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS OF SECTION 624.D.87.A
THROUGH M OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, AS
MODIFIED BELOW

2) NO MORE THAN FIVE (5) MOBILE FOOD VENDING UNITS AT A
TIME

3) TO BE PARKED AND LOCATED ON A DUSTPROOFED, PAVED
SURFACE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

4) SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 100 FEET OF MAYO
BOULEVARD, 56TH STREET OR 64TH STREET RIGHTS-OF-
WAY

5) THE USE IS LIMITED TO THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM TO 10:00 PM.

HE. MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES ONLY WITH SUBJECT MATTER
RELATED TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSION

2. INCREASED FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR): .85 0.65 OVERALL LIMIT FOR
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL.

3. INCREASED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS ARE
EXCLUSIVE OF (DO NOT INCLUDE) THE MECHANICAL FACILITIES ON TOP OF
BUILDINGS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE MAY
EXCEED THE HEIGHTS SPECIFIED BELOW TO ACCOUNT FOR THESE
MECHANICAL FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED SCREENING.

A. 250 FEET LIMITED TO 10% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL.

B. 70 FEET LIMITED TO 75% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL.

C. 35 FEET LIMITED TO 15% OF TOTAL NET AREA OF DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL.


IV. DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1

THESE DESIGN GUIDELINES SHALL APPLY TO ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1.

THE FOLLOWING DESIGN GUIDELINES FROM SECTION 507 TAB A OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL BE ELEVATED FROM CONSIDERATIONS (C)
AND PRESUMPTIONS (P) TO REQUIREMENTS (R) AND (R*):

A. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT.
Page 432
1. DESERT PRESERVATION.

(1.1) DEVELOPMENT SHALL MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING
HEALTHY SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION (TREES OVER 4-INCH CALIPER
IN DIAMETER) AND CACTI OVER 3 FEET IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY
NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS (TABLE 1). IF REMOVAL IS
NECESSARY, MATURE TREES AND CACTI SHALL BE SALVAGED AND
UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

PROTECTED NATIVE PLANTS SHALL MEAN CACTI, WHICH ARE 3 FEET, OR
GREATER IN HEIGHT AND TREES WHICH ARE 4 INCHES OR GREATER IN
CALIPER OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIES:

TABLE 1. PROTECTED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS

TREES:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA
ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA
BERBERIS HAEMATOCARPA RED BARBERY
CANOTIA HOLOCANTHA CRUCIFIXION THORN
CELTIS PALLIDA HACKBERRY
CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE
CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILL PALO VERDE
CHILOPSIS LINERARIS DESERT WILLOW
JUNIPERUS SPECIES JUNIPER
OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD
POPULUS FREMONTII COTTONWOOD
PROSOPIS SPECIES MESQUITE
QUERCUS SPECIES SCRIB OAK
RHUS OVATA SUGAR SUMAC
VAUQUELINEA CALIFORNICA ARIZONA ROSEWOOD
CACTI:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO
FEROCACTUS SPECIES BARREL
FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO
PENICEREUS GREGGII NIGHT-BLOOMING CEREUS

2. GRADING/DRAINAGE.

(2.2) SURFACE, SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
AVOID HARD LINED CHANNELS. (R)

(2.3) SURFACE SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHALL BE INTEGRATED
WITH THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE DESIGN. (R*)

(2.5) REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ADJACENT TO PERIMETER
STREETS MAY UTILIZE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR RETENTION

Page 433
PROVIDED:

- A MAXIMUM 50% OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK IS DEVOTED
TO RETENTION.

- THE MAXIMUM DEPTH OF RETENTION WITHIN 20 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
IS 24 INCHES.

- SIDE SLOPES ARE A MAXIMUM 4:1 (R)

3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) PLANT MATERIALS.

3.1.1 DEVELOPMENT SHALL MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING, NON-
NATIVE HEALTHY PLANTS (TREES 4-INCH CALIPER IN DIAMETER) OR
GREATER) AND CACTI (6 FEET HIGH OR GREATER). IF REMOVAL IS
NECESSARY, MATURE TREES SHALL BE SALVAGED AND UTILIZED ON
SITE. (R)

3.1.3 LOW WATER USE PLANTS THAT REFLECT AND ENHANCE THE IMAGE
OF THE SONORAN DESERT SHALL BE USED. (R)

3.1.5 ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE TREATMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE
WITH AND RELATE TO ANY ESTABLISHED DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER IN
THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT AREA. (R*)

3.1.9 COORDINATE SITE UTILITY ELEMENTS SUCH AS OVERHEAD POWER
LINES, TRANSFORMERS, METER BOXES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AND
FIRE PROTECTION DEVICES, WITH LANDSCAPE DESIGN TO EFFECTIVELY
DIMINISH THE IMPACT OF SUCH ELEMENTS ON THE SITE CHARACTER. (R*)

3.1.10 TREES SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
WALKWAYS, AND MULTI-USE TRAILS AND PATHS, TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM
OF 50% SHADE AND A MINIMUM CANOPY CLEARANCE OF 6 FEET 8
INCHES. (R)

3.1.11 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND COMFORT SHALL BE CONSIDERED
WHEN SELECTING TREES AND PLANT MATERIAL. (R*)

3.1.13 NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT MATURITY OR
10% OF THE NET LOT AREA, WHICHEVER IS LESS, SHALL BE PLANTED IN
TURF OR HIGH-WATER USE PLANTS. FUNCTIONAL TURF AREAS SUCH AS
IN PARKS, SCHOOLS, MULTIPLE-FAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY COMMON
AREAS, INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOT, AND GOLF COURSES ARE
EXEMPT. (R)

3.1.14 A MINIMUM 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT MATURITY
(EXCLUDING HARDSCAPE AREAS) SHALL BE TREATED WITH LIVING
VEGETATION INCLUDING GROUNDCOVER, SHRUBS AND TREES, AS WELL
AS INORGANIC MATERIAL AND AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. (R)

3.1.15 IF ALLOWED BY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, THE PLACEMENT OF RECYCLING CONTAINERS IN A
Page 434
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK OR REQUIRED LANDSCAPED ISLAND
SHALL NOT RESULT IN THE ELIMINATION OF ANY REQUIRED TREES. (R)

(3.2) MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE AREAS.

3.2.1 NATIVE SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION SHALL NOT BE PRUNED OR
REMOVED FROM AREAS IDENTIFIED ON APPROVED PLANS AS
PERMANENT UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE UNLESS DEMONSTRATED TO
THE CITY THAT A HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE ISSUE EXISTS. THIS
INCLUDES REMOVAL OF DEAD TREES OR CACTI. (R)

3.2.3 A PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE
INSTALLED TO WATER ALL TREES, CACTI, AND PLANTS INSTALLED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS OR OTHER
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DOCUMENTS TO MINIMIZE MAINTENANCE AND
WATER CONSUMPTION, AND TO MAXIMIZE PLANT HEALTH,
SURVIVABILITY, AND VIABILITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. (R)

(3.4) ART/WATER ELEMENTS.

3.4.1 WATER FEATURES, INCLUDING FOUNTAINS, SHALL BE SITED TO
ALLOW SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT PRIMARILY TO
ON-SITE AND INCIDENTALLY TO OFF-SITE USERS AND TO MINIMIZE
WATER CONSUMPTION. (R*)

3.4.2 IF THERE IS PUBLIC ART, IT SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
OVERALL DESIGN OF A PROJECT. (R*)

4. OPEN SPACE/AMENITIES.

(4.1) IMPROVED OPEN SPACES, PLAZAS AND COURTYARDS SHALL BE
SHADED A MINIMUM 50% AND FUNCTIONAL IN TERMS OF AREA,
DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND AMENITIES TO PROMOTE SAFE HUMAN
INTERACTION. (R*)

(4.2) USABLE PUBLIC SPACE SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM OF 50%
SHADING THROUGH THE USE OF TREES OR STRUCTURES THAT PROVIDE
SHADING, OR A COMBINATION OF THE TWO UNLESS OTHERWISE
PROHIBITED BY SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES OR OTHER TECHNICAL
CONSTRAINTS. (R)

6. PARKING/CIRCULATION.

(6.1) SURFACE PARKING DESIGN.

6.1.3 PARKING AREAS SHALL BE BUFFERED FROM ADJACENT
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND SCREENED FROM STREETS SO THAT
CARS ARE NOT VISIBLE BELOW THE AVERAGE HEIGHT OF THE
HEADLIGHTS. (R)

6.1.7 SURFACE PARKING DESIGN SHALL UTILIZE SHARED ACCESS DRIVES
WITH ADJACENT, SIMILARLY ZONED PROPERTIES. (R)


Page 435
6.1.9 EXCESSIVE ASPHALT/HARDSCAPE NOT NEEDED FOR ADEQUATE
VEHICULAR MANEUVERING OR PARKING, STAGING OR MATERIAL
STORAGE SHALL BE MINIMIZED. (R*)

(6.2) PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN.

6.2.3 THE PARKING STRUCTURE EXTERIOR SHALL BE FINISHED WITH
ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND DETAILING THAT WILL CREATE
VISUAL INTEREST FOR ADJOINING PROPERTIES. (R*)

6.2.4 LIGHTING WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL PROVIDE
SAFETY AND SECURITY AND BE INTEGRATED INTO THE ARCHITECTURAL
CHARACTER BOTH IN TERMS OF ILLUMINATION AND FIXTURES. (R*)

6.2.10 THERE SHALL BE A CONVENIENT, CLEAR, SAFE AND EFFICIENT
INTERNAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE FOR
BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC INCLUDING APPROPRIATE
SIGNAGE AND PLACEMENT OF PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION CORES
(ELEVATORS AND STAIRS). (R*)

(6.3) ACCESS/CIRCULATION.

6.3.2 THE SITE PLAN SHALL CLEARLY EXPRESS THE SEPARATION
BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. (R*)

7. WALLS/FENCING.

(7.1) WALLS ADJACENT TO ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS SHALL
HAVE A FINISHED APPEARANCE. UNTEXTURED, UNFINISHED BLOCK AND
REINFORCED, MORTAR-FREE CONCRETE WALLS SHALL BE AVOIDED. (R*)

(7.2) WALL LENGTHS EXCEEDING 50 FEET ADJACENT TO ARTERIAL AND
COLLECTOR STREETS SHALL BE ARTICULATED OR CONTAIN
SUBSTANTIAL LANDSCAPING TO BREAK THE CONTINUOUS WALL
SURFACE AND CREATE VARYING SHADING PATTERNS. (R*)

8. SITE LIGHTING.

(8.1) ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO PREVENT DIRECT
VISIBILITY OF THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY. (R)

(8.2) LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED WITH CUT-OFF FIXTURES AND
DEFLECTORS TO DIRECT LIGHT DOWNWARD AND LIMIT ON-SITE
LIGHTING LEVELS TO A MAXIMUM OF 1-FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY
LINE. (R)

(8.5) SERVICE AREAS AND OTHER SCREENED AREAS SHALL HAVE
PROPER SECURITY LIGHTING. (R*)

(8.6) LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ILLUMINATION SHALL BE OF SIMILAR
DESIGN AND CHARACTER AS THE PROJECT’S BUILDING COMPONENTS.
(R*)

(8.7) SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE PERSONAL SAFETY
Page 436
AT BUILDING ENTRANCE/EXITS, AND IN PUBLIC ASSEMBLY AND PARKING
AREAS. (R*)

(8.8) RECOMMENDED LIGHTING LEVELS AND UNIFORMITY RATIOS
ESTABLISHED BY THE ILLUMINATION ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF NORTH
AMERICA (IESNA), AS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX, SHALL
BE INCORPORATED IN LIGHTING DESIGN FOR ON-SITE NON-RESIDENTIAL
AND MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. (R*)

B. BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION.

1. PLACEMENT/ORIENTATION.

(1.2) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT THE
ORIENTATION OF SURROUNDING BUILDINGS AND SURROUNDING
STREETS BY MAINTAINING CONTINUITY OF PEDESTRIAN ROUTES AND
PROMOTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEDESTRIAN INTERACTION AT THE
STREET LEVEL. (R*)

(1.4) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT CLIMATIC
CONDITIONS BY MINIMIZING HEAT GAIN AND CONSIDERING THE IMPACT
OF SHADE ON ADJACENT LAND USES AND AREAS. (R*)

(1.5) NATURAL SURVEILLANCE SHALL BE MAXIMIZED IN PROJECT DESIGN
TO ENCOURAGE EASY OBSERVATION OF PEOPLE AND PROPERTY NEAR
ENTRYWAYS, PATHWAYS, PUBLIC SPACES AND PARKING LOTS. (R*)

(1.6) PROJECTS OR PORTIONS OF PROJECTS IN PUBLIC VIEW (ADJACENT
TO STREETS AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS) SHALL DEMONSTRATE A
GREATER LEVEL OF DESIGN SENSITIVITY AND DETAIL TO VISUAL IMAGE
THAN OTHER DEVELOPMENT. (R*)

2. HEIGHT, BULK, AND AREA.

(2.2) PARAPET WALLS SHALL NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE BUILDING
HEIGHT MORE THAN 5 FEET FOR A BUILDING THAT IS 20 FEET OR LESS IN
HEIGHT OR 7 FEET FOR A BUILDING ABOVE 20 FEET IN HEIGHT UNLESS
GREATER HEIGHT IS NEEDED TO SCREEN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. (R*)

3. ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) ARCHITECTURE AND APPLIED TREATMENTS THAT EXPRESS
CORPORATE IDENTITY SHALL BE TEMPERED TO PROVIDE UNIQUE
STRUCTURES THAT COMPLEMENT AND BLEND WITH THEIR IMMEDIATE
CONTEXT. (R*)

(3.2) PARKING SHADE AND CANOPY STRUCTURES SHALL BE
COMPLEMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE PRIMARY BUILDINGS
AND HAVE MINIMAL VISUAL IMPACT TO THE PUBLIC STREETSCAPE AND
ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. (R*)

4. ARTICULATION.

(4.1) BUILDING FACADES VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS AND ADJACENT
Page 437
TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT EXCEED 100 FEET SHALL CONTAIN
ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND DETAILING SUCH AS TEXTURAL
CHANGES, PILASTERS, OFFSETS, RECESSES, WINDOW FENESTRATION,
SHADOW BOXES AND OVERHEAD/CANOPIES. (R*)

(4.2) THE BUILDING FACADE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A SENSE
OF HUMAN SCALE AT GROUND LEVEL BY PROVIDING A CLEAR
ARCHITECTURAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR LEVELS AND
ALL ADDITIONAL LEVELS. (R*)

(4.3) BUILDING ENTRANCES SHALL BE IDENTIFIABLE AND DIRECTLY
ACCESSIBLE FROM A PUBLIC SIDEWALK. (R*)

5. COLORS/MATERIALS.

(5.1) ALL SIDES OF A STRUCTURE SHALL EXHIBIT DESIGN CONTINUITY
AND CONTAIN MULTIPLE EXTERIOR ACCENT MATERIALS THAT EXHIBIT
QUALITY AND DURABILITY. EXAMPLES INCLUDE MATERIALS SUCH AS
BRICK, STONE, COLORED TEXTURED CONCRETE OR STUCCO. ROOF
MATERIALS MAY INCLUDE TREATED METAL, CONCRETE, AND CLAY TILES,
DECORATIVE WOOD, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS. (R*)

(5.2) MULTIPLE BUILDINGS ON THE SAME SITE SHALL BORROW AND
INCORPORATE (NOT DUPLICATE) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES, MATERIALS,
FORMS, FEATURES, COLORS AND COMPATIBLE ELEMENTS FROM THE
SAME SITE. THESE SHALL INCLUDE: CONTINUATION OF DISTINCTIVE
ROOFLINES, COVERED WALKWAY ALIGNMENTS, CONSISTENT DETAILING
OF FINISH, ACCENT FEATURES ON ALL VISIBLE SIDES OF STRUCTURES,
COMPATIBLE SHAPES, MATERIAL, WALL AND LANDSCAPING TREATMENT.
(R*)

(5.3) THE EXTENSIVE USE OF THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL
TREATMENTS AND DETAILS ARE STRONGLY DISCOURAGED AND SHALL
BE LIMITED IN THEIR PROPOSED APPLICATION:

- COLORED PLASTIC OR FIBERGLASS

- SHINY METAL DETAILS OR REFLECTIVE MATERIALS

- UNTEXTURED CONCRETE, UNFINISHED BLOCK, STEEL PANELS, OR
ASPHALT SHINGLES AS A PREDOMINANT EXTERIOR MATERIAL. (R*)

(5.4) CORPORATE COLORS, ASSOCIATED GRAPHICS, AND HIGHLY
CONTRASTING BANDS OF VIBRANT COLORS ON BUILDINGS AND ON
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (EXCLUDING SIGNAGE) SHALL BE USED AS AN
ACCENT FEATURE WITH RESTRAINT AS A MINOR ELEMENT OF THE
BUILDING’S EXTERIOR. (R*)

(5.5) PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC
STREETS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 30% OF
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COMPOSED OF ALTERNATIVE BUILDING
MATERIALS SUCH AS GLASS, BRICK, MASONRY, STONE AND STUCCO. (R*)

6. PUBLIC AMENITIES/ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
Page 438
(6.1) PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND GATHERING
AREAS SHALL BE SHADED (MINIMUM 50% AT MATURITY) FOR THE
HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF PEDESTRIANS AND TO ENCOURAGE
USE. (R)

(6.2) OVERHANGS AND CANOPIES SHALL BE INTEGRATED IN THE
BUILDING DESIGN ALONG ALL PEDESTRIAN THOROUGHFARES. FOR
PLANNED COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTERS WITH EXTERIOR
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, CONTINUOUS SHADE PROTECTED
WALKWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED. (R*)

(6.3) THERE SHALL BE CONVENIENT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS BETWEEN BUS STOP/SHELTER AND THE BUILDING ENTRY
AND/OR ACTIVITY AREA(S). (R*)

7. SCREENING.

(7.1) SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED AWAY FROM PUBLIC VIEW. (R*)

(7.3) ALL SCREENING SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE WITH
THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. (R*)

(7.5) ALL NEW OR RELOCATED ELECTRIC LINES 12 KV AND SMALLER,
COMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE TELEVISION AND ALL ON PREMISE WIRING
SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND IN ALL DEVELOPMENTS WHERE
VISIBLE FROM STREETS OR ADJOINING PROPERTIES. (R*)

V. ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1

THE FOLLOWING ARE ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES APPLICABLE TO ALL
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, USING THE SAME
IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS PER SECTION 507.C OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE:

1. A MAXIMUM OF 60% OF EXTERIOR BUILDING FACADES SHALL BE
FINISHED WITH STUCCO MATERIAL. (R*)

2. LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
SIDEWALKS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS PER
SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE. (R*)

3. LIGHTING SHOULD BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL MULTI-USE TRAILS
PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE. (P)

4. WHERE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS CROSS A VEHICULAR PATH, THE
PATHWAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DECORATIVE PAVERS, STAMPED
OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR OTHER PAVEMENT TREATMENTS, THAT
VISUALLY CONTRASTS PARKING AND DRIVE AISLE SURFACES. (R*)

5. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE DECORATIVE
PAVERS, STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR SIMILAR ALTERNATIVE
MATERIAL. (R*)


Page 439
6. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE ENHANCED
LANDSCAPING ON BOTH SIDES WITHIN MINIMUM 250-SQUARE-FOOT
LANDSCAPE AREAS AND SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM 5-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE MEDIAN, PLANTED WITH A VARIETY OF AT LEAST THREE
PLANT MATERIALS, AND MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON
CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS WITH THE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN.
(R)

7. TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL SITE ENTRIES
AND EXITS TO SLOW DOWN VEHICULAR SPEEDS AS THEY APPROACH
SIDEWALKS. (R*)

8. INTERIOR WALLS AND PRIVACY FENCING SHALL USE MATERIALS AND
COLORS THAT BLEND WITH THE NATURAL DESERT ENVIRONMENT. (R*)

9. IF PROVIDED, A COMBINATION OF VIEW WALLS/FENCING AND PARTIAL
VIEW WALLS/FENCING SHALL BE INCORPORATED ALONG PROPERTY
LINES ADJACENT TO DEDICATED PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE
AREAS, NATURAL AND/OR IMPROVED DRAINAGEWAYS OR
RECREATIONAL AREAS. (R*)

10. DRAINAGE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO LOOK NATURAL IN THE
DESERT SETTING THROUGH COLOR, TEXTURE, LANDSCAPING, OR
OTHER MEANS. (R*)

11. ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED AT ALL PUBLIC STREET CROSSING LOCATIONS TO
INTERCONNECT THE PEDESTRIAN TRAILS THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRETY
OF THE SITE. (R*)

12. WASTE STATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE A COMPOST RECEPTACLE
WHENEVER POSSIBLE, WITH INFORMATIONAL SIGNS INDICATING WHAT
TYPE OF WASTE SHOULD GO IN WHICH RECEPTACLE. (C)

3.CP/BP.2 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2

Size: 205 231.45 acres
Uses permitted: Permitted uses shall be as indicated in Section 626, Commerce Park
District (Business Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance (Supp. dated
4/19/95) (Ref. Appendix A.7), as modified below.

Potential APPLICABLE Zoning to Be Applied: CP/BP as per Section 626 of the City of
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance as modified below and per Section C.4.D of this chapter. This
zoning is to be WAS applied upon City Council approval of the 1995 major amendment to
the Desert Ridge Specific Plan relating to this superblock.

Special Conditions and Requirements: I. PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS:

1. Commerce Park (BUSINESS PARK OPTION) uses are allowed subject to the
standards described in Section C.4.D of this chapter.

2. The development of uses in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall occur only in the
Page 440
following sequence:

a. Construction of a hospital structure with a minimum of 125 beds (hospital
defined pursuant to the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Ref. Appendix A.9),
including accessory retail wholly within the hospital structure.

b. Construction (which may occur simultaneously with the hospital structure
defined above) of other medical facilities as defined in special condition and
requirements 3.a.2 below.

c. After the completion of construction of the hospital structure, as evidenced
by the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, construction will be allowed
to commence for any other use allowed in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

3 1 2. The following is a list of modifications to certain design/development standards
and the list of permitted uses included in Section 626, Commerce Park (Business
Park Option), of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance which shall apply
exclusively to Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2) PERMITTED USES: PER THE
BASE PERMITTED USES OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1,
INCLUDING REQUIRED CONDITIONS TO USE THE ENHANCED PERMTTED
USES, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW:

A. HOSPITAL

B. MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND ASSOCIATED DORMITORIES AND
MEDICAL

C. NURSING HOME

D. DEPENDENT CARE FACILITIES

1) IF FREESTANDING, SUBJECT TO AREA LIMITATIONS OF
SECTION 1.B.

E. MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES ONLY WITH SUBJECT MATTER
RELATED TO THE MEDICAL PROFESSION

F. MEDICAL APPLIANCE AND OTHER MEDICALLY RELATED SALES

a. Additional Permitted Uses/Development Conditions:

1) Hospitals (as defined in Appendix A.9)

2) Medical facilities, including:

a) The provision of diagnostic services, extensive medical
treatment including but not limited to surgical and other
hospital services, as well as continuous nursing service, and
including but not limited to general medical and surgical
hospitals, specialty hospitals, medical clinics, medical
laboratories, outpatient care facilities, medical schools and
associated dormitories, medically related educational
facilities, medical and associated accessory offices,

Page 441
pharmacies, and similar uses.

b) Facilities for conducting research in the natural or physical
sciences, or engineering and development as an extension
of investigation with the objective of creating end products
on a contract or fee basis and including pilot plant operation.

c) Manufacturing related to medical, pharmaceutical, and
biotechnical products or equipment. Manufacturing shall
include the fabrication and assembly of finished products or
sub-assemblies, so long as the primary use of the property
is not the basic processing and compounding of raw
material or food products.

d) The provision of intermediate or long-term nursing and
health related care to individuals, typically classified as
nursing homes.

e) Dwelling providing shelter and services for the elderly or for
disabled persons, which may include meals, housekeeping,
personal care assistance and minor medical services
including intermediate, long term or extended nursing care
for residents.

f) Food services for the employees, visitors and patients of the
medical facility

g) Non-freestanding retail uses within a medical
facility/hospital building, are allowed subject to the following
conditions:

(1) The maximum gross leasable area for any one
tenant/user shall be 5,000 square feet.

(2) All retail sales occur only within the walls of the
medical facility/hospital building. The entrance to a
retail sales business shall be from within the walls of
the medical facility/hospital building. No external
signage of any kind shall be permitted so as to be
visible from any public thoroughfare or adjacent
property.

h) Helistops or heliports.

i) Clubs, private or public, qualifying by law as a non-profit
entity.

j) Dependent care facilities, subject to the following
conditions:

(1) If the dependent care facility is a freestanding
structure, it shall be subject to the conditions for
freestanding retail uses as described in 3.a.4 below.


Page 442
k) Wellness centers/clinics.

l) Museums and galleries only with subject matter related to
the medical profession.

m) Places of worship, only in non-freestanding and integrated
into a hospital or a medical facility building.

n) Places of assembly, only if indoors, non-freestanding and
integrated into a hospital or a medical facility building.

3) Medical appliance and other medically related sales.

4) Freestanding retail uses, are allowed in Development Parcel
3.CP/BP.2 subject to the following conditions:

a) The maximum gross leasable area for any one tenant/user
(other thaNt a restaurant) shall be 5,000 square feet.

b) Freestanding retail uses must be located set back a A
minimum SETBACK of 300 feet from 56th Street, 64th
Street and Avenue K MAYO BOULEVARD. External
signage must not be visible from a public thoroughfare or
adjacent property. (It is intended that the freestanding retail
and restaurant uses in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 be
used primarily by the employees, patients and visitors of the
hospital and medical facilities. These freestanding retail
uses are not intended to be used by persons not working or
visiting within Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.)

c) The maximum aggregate gross leasable area or OF
freestanding retail uses and freestanding
restaurants/bars/cocktail lounges in Development Parcel
3.CP/BP.2 shall be 50,000 square feet.

5) Accessory uses with hotels/motels: Non-freestanding retail
newsstands, gift shops or other customary services, restaurants
and cocktail lounges are allowed as accessory uses within hotels
and motels, provided that the entrance to such uses shall be from
within the exterior walls of the building only.

6) Multiple family attached MULTIFAMILY residential dwellings. A
maximum of 300 multiple family dwellings shall be allowed in
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

7) Single-family detached residential, DETACHED dwellings. A
maximum of 20 single-family dwelling shall be allowed in
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2.

b. Modifications of Permitted Building Heights.

The heights of buildings in Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be
governed by the table presented below. The maximum building heights are
exclusive of (do not include) the mechanical facilities on top of the
Page 443
buildings. Consequently, the total height of the structure may exceed the
heights specified below to account for these mechanical facilities.

2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: PER THE BASE DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS FOR ENHANCED DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1, EXCEPT AS
MODIFIED BELOW THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE COMMERCE PARK (BUSINESS PARK
OPTION) ZONING DISTRICT.

A. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:

THE HEIGHTS OF BUILDINGS IN DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2
SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE TABLE PRESENTED BELOW. THE
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS ARE EXCLUSIVE OF (DO NOT INCLUDE)
THE MECHANICAL FACILITIES ON TOP OF THE BUILDINGS.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE MAY
EXCEED THE HEIGHTS SPECIFIED BELOW TO ACCOUNT FOR THESE
MECHANICAL FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED SCREENING.


Use Maximum Building Height
Hospitals 250 feet

Clinics 250 feet

Hotels/motels 56 feet

Medical facilities, except 56 feet
hospitals/clinics

Office building for non-two 40 feet
stories, not to exceed
medical facilities

Retail and restaurant uses 40 feet

Multifamily residential 56 feet

All other uses 40 feet

4. Building Setbacks: Buildings must be setback a minimum of 100 feet and an
average of 125 feet from 56th Street, 64th Street (if applicable) and Avenue K.
Buildings must be setback 100 feet from all other streets. Buildings must be
setback 30 feet from all other lot lines. Reach 11 setbacks are governed by Section
C.4.D, Design Standards 2.a, of this chapter.

5 B. Floor Area Ratio: 0.85 overall limit for development parcel.

C. MAXIMUM DENSITY: 300 MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS AND 20
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS.

6 Parking. Off-street parking and loading requirements may be modified by the
Development Service Department when supported by an appropriately
Page 444
documented study.

7 Signage.: This development parcel may be exempted from the Desert Ridge
Comprehensive Sign Plan if the city approves a separate comprehensive sign plan
for this development parcel.

8. 3. Relationship of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 to balance of Specific Plan. In the event that
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 is developed with a minimum 125 bed hospital, then after the
completion of such hospital, the THE DEVELOPMENT parcel shall be treated as
a separate and distinct entity within the Desert Ridge Specific Plan. Specifically, a
single development entity may be designated by the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 at
the owners’s discretion to be responsible to the City of Phoenix for all matters
related to the specific plan, including but not limited to reporting on development
progress within the parcel, applying for major and minor amendments, and acting
in the place of the Master Developer with regard to Parcel 3.CP/BP.2. The
relationship between Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 and the Desert Ridge Master Developer
shall be governed by the CC&R’s, design guidelines, and other contractual
documents that may be entered into by the property owner and the Master
Developer. This specific plan shall continue to control land uses, design standards
within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as described above in Section C.4.D of this chapter, and
the permitted 25 percent increase or decrease in area of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as
described in Chapter 4 of this specific plan.

4. MASTER PLANS: MASTER PLANS, PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER
4 OF THE DESERT RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN AND PER THE PLANNED
COMMUNITY DISTRICT (PCD), SECTION 636 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE, SHALL BE SUBMITTED, AND SHALL BE UPDATED WITH EACH
PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT. THE INITIAL MASTER PLANS SUBMITTED BY THE MASTER
DEVELOPER SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

A. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF DETACHED SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPE
WITHIN LANDSCAPE STRIPS, BUFFERED BIKE LANES, AND
SHARED-USE PATHS ALONG 56TH STREET, MAYO BOULEVARD
AND 64TH STREET PER SECTION 7 OF THIS CHAPTER, TO BE
INCLUDED ON THE MASTER OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE
AND TRAILS PLAN AND MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN.

B. COMPLETE BUILD-OUT OF BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS PER
SECTION 10.C 3.CP/BP.2.II.4.D OF THIS CHAPTER, TO BE INCLUDED
ON THE MASTER OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRAILS
PLAN.

C. A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION PLAN TO INCLUDE
INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CIRCULATION ON SITE THAT
ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST CONVENIENCE, SAFETY
AND COMFORT, WITH A FOCUS ON CONNECTING THE EAST AND
WEST SIDES OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.1 NORTH OF
MAYO BOULEVARD.

9 The development of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as a medically-related commerce park is
intended to occur in an integrated manner over a period of years. In order to assure
that Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 develops in accordance with the provisions of the 1995
Page 445
Major Specific Plan Amendment creating this development parcel, the following
regulations are established. In the event that construction of a hospital structure,
as defined in Appendix A.9, has commenced by December 31, 1996, the
commencement and completion of such construction shall be permitted pursuant
to those applicable provisions of the 1995 Major Specific Plan Amendment in effect
as of the effective date of said amendment, governing permitted and accessory
uses, height of buildings, lot coverage limitations, floor area ratios, and off-street
parking and loading standards (hereinafter, the “current regulation”), and the
development of the balance of Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 may be completed
pursuant to the current regulations subject to the following conditions:

a. That within 180 days of the adoption of the 1995 Major Specific Plan
Amendment creating this development parcel, the owner of Development
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall file with the city a conceptual site plan (the “site
plan”), which plan shall describe, at a minimum and with a reasonable
degree of certainty, all of the following:

1) A conceptual layout of this entire development parcel showing
individual development units which shall list the use or uses
intended in each individual development unit.

2) The height of the buildings in each individual development unit.

3) The total square footage of all buildings proposed for Parcel
3.CP/BP.2, together with the proposed allocation of the total
square footage to each individual development unit.

4) The boundaries of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, together with the total gross
land area and net land area of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, as defined in
Section 202 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

5) The required off-street parking facilities indicating the number of
parking spaces provided for each use within each individual
development unit.

6) The location of any proposed loading space or dock within any
individual development unit.

b. All construction and development within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be in
accordance with the site plan, as may be revised from time to time as set
forth in this paragraph 9.

c. Prior to the completion of construction of the hospital structure, the owner
of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall submit to the city a revised site plan showing
the hospital structure and any changes to the square footage of buildings.
Changes to the square footage shall be limited to a reallocation of the
total square footage of all buildings to different development units within
Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, or within an existing individual development unit, but
the total square footage of buildings in Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 as shown on the
original site plan shall not be changed. Following the submittal of the
revised site plan, the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be permitted to
commence and complete construction of another building or buildings or
structure or structures in any one of the individual development units
pursuant to the current regulations, so long as the commencement of
Page 446
construction of said building(s) or structure(s) shall occur not later than 7
years from the submittal of the revised site plan.

Prior to the completion of the second building or structure, and each
building or structure thereafter, the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall
submit to the city a revised site plan showing all buildings completed and
any changes to the allocation of the total square footage of buildings
between different development units within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2, or within an
existing individual development unit. Following the submittal of each
revised site plan, the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall be permitted to
commence and complete construction of the next building or structure,
and each building or structure thereafter, under the current regulations, so
long as the commencement of said construction occurs not later than 7
years after the submittal of each revised site plan. Construction of each
building or structure within Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall follow this procedure.

d. Whenever the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 submits a site plan to the city in
accordance with this paragraph 9, the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 shall
provide a copy of the submitted site plan to the Master Developer.

e. If the owner of Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 fails to comply with the provisions of
subparagraphs 9.a, 9.b and 9.c above, then future development of Parcel
3.CP/BP.2 shall be governed by the regulations relating to permitted and
accessory uses, height of buildings, lot coverage limitations, floor area
ratios, and off-street parking and loading standards then in effect.

II. ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL
3.CP/BP.2:

1. STREET STANDARDS:

A. MAYO BOULEVARD CROSS SECTION: THE 24-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE MEDIAN ALONG MAYO BOULEVARD MAY BE REDUCED
TO ALLOW FOR WIDENED AND BUFFERED BIKE LANES, AS
APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.
LANDSCAPE MEDIANS SHALL BE PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE
LANDSCAPE STANARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.2.II.2 OF THIS
CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE PATH EASEMENTS:
SIDEWALK EASEMENTS AND SHARED-USE PATH EASEMENTS
SHALL BE DEDICATED WHERE NECESSARY TO PERMIT DETACHED
SIDEWALKS AND SHARED-USE PATHS, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
C. MAYO BOULEVARD (SOUTH SIDE): A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
DETACHED SIDEWALK SEPARATED BY A MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE STRIP LOCATED BETWEEN THE BACK OF CURB AND
SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF
MAYO BOULEVARD, EXCEPT WHERE THERE ARE EXISTING
SIDEWALKS, PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE
STANDARDS PER SECTION 3.CP/BP.2.II.2 OF THIS CHAPTER AND
MAINTAINED WITH A WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
Page 447
D. 56TH STREET (SOUTH OF MAYO BOULEVARD): THE EXISTING
LANDSCAPE STRIP ON THE EAST SIDE OF 56TH STREET ADJACENT
TO THE DETACHED SIDEWALK SHALL BE REPLENISHED AND
PLANTED TO THE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE STANDARDS PER
SECTION 3.CP/BP.2.II.2 OF THIS CHAPTER AND MAINTAINED WITH A
WATERING SYSTEM, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

E. MULTI-USE TRAIL CONNECTING TO REACH 11: A 10-FOOT-WIDE
MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT (MUTE) SHALL BE DEDICATED WITHIN
THE EASTERN EDGE OF DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.2, AND A
MINIMUM 10-FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL (MUT) SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT TO CONNECT SOUTH TO
REACH 11 TRAILS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MAG
SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL AND AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

F. LANDSCAPE STRIP REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION: IN AREAS WHERE
DRAINAGE CULVERTS, RIGHT TURN LANES AND BUS BAYS OCCUR
AND LIMIT AVAILABLE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
STRIPS OF THIS SECTION MAY BE REDUCED OR ELIMINATED BY
THE STREET TRANSPORATION DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE
SIDEWALKS AND SHARED USE PATHWAYS MAY BE PROVIDED IN
SUCH AREAS WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT OFFSET.

2. STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLANTING STANDARDS:

A. TREES FOR 10-FOOT-WIDE OR WIDER LANDSCAPE STRIPS:
MINIMUM 3-INCH CALIPER, SINGLE-TRUNK, LARGE CANOPY,
DROUGHT-TOLERANT, SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON
CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

B. TREES FOR 5-FOOT-WIDE, LESS THAN 10-FOOT-WIDE, LANDSCAPE
STRIPS: MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER, SINGLE-TRUNK, LARGE
CANOPY, DROUGHT-TOLERANT, SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET
ON CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS.

C. LIVE COVERAGE: DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHRUBS, ACCENTS AND
VEGETATIVE GROUNDCOVERS MAINTAINED TO A MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF 36 INCHES TO ACHIEVE A MINIMUM OF 75% LIVE
COVERAGE AT MATURITY.

D. UTILITY CONFLICTS: WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS EXIST, THE
DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ON AN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN
SOLUTION CONSISTENT WITH A PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT.

3. VEHICULAR PARKING: OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WHEN SUPPORTED BY AN
APPROPRIATELY DOCUMENTED STUDY.



Page 448
A. EV INSTALLED SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE REQUIRED
PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING STRUCTURES,
SHALL BE ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) INSTALLED SPACES, DEFINED
AS A PARKING SPACE THAT INCLUDES ACCESS TO AN EV
CHARGER, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

B. EV CAPABLE SPACES: A MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF THE REQUIRED
PARKING SPACES, LOCATED WITHIN PARKING STRUCTURES,
SHALL BE EV CAPABLE SPACES, DEFINED AS A PARKING SPACE
THAT INCLUDES ACCESS TO ELECTRICAL WIRING TO ALLOW FOR
A FUTURE JUNCTION BOX AND APPROPRIATE VOLTAGE FOR AN
OUTLET CAPABLE OF CHARGING A VEHICLE, AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

4. BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE:

A. BUFFERED AND WIDENED BIKE LANES: EXISTING BIKE LANES
SHOULD BE WIDENED AND SHALL BE BUFFERED ON BOTH SIDES
OF MAYO BOULEVARD, AS APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

B. ON-SITE BICYCLE CIRCULATION: BIKE LANES, BIKE BOULEVARDS,
OR OTHER DESIGN STANDARDS TO MAXIMIZE BICYCLIST
VISIBILITY, SAFETY AND BICYCLIST CIRCULATION ON SITE
THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL SHALL BE PROVIDED
AND INSTALLED PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE BICYCLE &
PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDANCE ELEMENT, CHAPTER 3 (BICYCLE
TOOLBOX), OF THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

C. BICYCLE PARKING: BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED PER
THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H.6 OF THE PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE, IN ADDITION TO THE FOLLOWING. NON-
SECURED BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED THROUGH
INVERTED U AND ARTISTIC RACKS LOCATED NEAR ALL BUILDING
ENTRANCES, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BELOW, AND
INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1307.H OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE.

1) MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL SHALL PROVIDE SECURED
BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.25
SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT AND GUEST BICYCLE
PARKING SPACES AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.05 SPACES PER
DWELLING UNIT.

2) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL PROVIDE
BICYCLE PARKING LOCATED IN COMMON OPEN SPACE
AREAS AT A MINIMUM RATE OF 0.05 SPACES PER DWELLING
UNIT.



Page 449
D. BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS: BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS (“FIX IT
STATIONS”) SHALL BE PROVIDED, MAINTAINED AND EVENLY
DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL AND
SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO SIDEWALKS, WALKWAYS,
SHARED-USE PATHS AND MULTI-USE TRAILS, SPACED A MINIMUM
OF A QUARTER MILE APART. THE BICYCLE REPAIR STATIONS (“FIX
IT STATIONS”) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AN AREA OF HIGH
VISIBILITY AND SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR MANEUVERING
AREAS, WHERE APPLICABLE. THE REPAIR STATION SHALL
INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:

1) STANDARD REPAIR TOOLS AFFIXED TO THE STATION.

2) A TIRE GAUGE AND PUMP AFFIXED TO THE BASE OF THE
STATION OR THE GROUND.

3) A BICYCLE REPAIR STAND WHICH ALLOWS PEDALS AND
WHEELS TO SPIN FREELY WHILE MAKING ADJUSTMENTS
TO THE BIKE.

E. ELECTRIC BICYCLE CHARGING: A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE
REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL INCLUDE STANDARD
ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLES, OR STANDARD ELECTRICAL OUTLETS
FOR SECURED BICYCLE PARKING, FOR ELECTRIC BICYCLE
CHARGING CAPABILITIES.

5. SIGNAGE: THIS DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS EXEMPTED FROM THE DESERT
RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN IF A SEPARATE COMPREHNESIVE
SIGN PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PARCEL IS APPROVED.

6. ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT:

A. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL STREETS WITHIN AND
ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT WITH PAVING, CURB, GUTTER,
SIDEWALK, CURB RAMPS, STREETLIGHTS, MEDIAN ISLANDS,
LANDSCAPING, AND OTHER INCIDENTALS, AS PER PLANS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL ADA ACCESSIBILITY
STANDARDS.

B. THIS PARCEL IS IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA) CALLED
ZONE AO, ON PANEL 1315 L OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS
(FIRM) DATED JANUARY 4, 2021. THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS
SHALL APPLY, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:

1) THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER IS REQUIRED TO SHOW THE
FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY LIMITS ON THE GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN AND ENSURE THAT IMPACTS TO THE
PROPOSED FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED,
FOLLOWING THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
(NFIP) REGULATIONS (44 CFR PARAGRAPH 60.3). THIS
INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED TO PROVISIONS IN THE LATEST


Page 450
VERSIONS OF THE FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE OF THE
PHOENIX CITY CODE.

2) A COPY OF THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO THE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT SECTION
OF THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS.

3) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON
CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT FOR
APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PERMITS.

4) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE AN ELEVATION
CERTIFICATE (FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON BUILDINGS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND A MINIMUM 95% COMPACTION
TEST RESULTS FOR THE BUILDING PADS TO FLOODPLAIN
MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
BUILDING PERMITS.

5) THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE
(FEMA FORM 086-0-33) BASED ON FINISHED CONSTRUCTION
TO FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

C. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT
DISCLOSE THE EXISTENCE AND OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
OF THE SCOTTSDALE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (SDL) TO FUTURE
OWNERS OR TENANTS OF THE PROPERTY. THE FORM AND
CONTENT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE
TEMPLATES AND INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED WHICH HAVE BEEN
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.

D. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A NO HAZARD DETERMINATION
FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT THAT EXCEEDS 70 FEET IN
HEIGHT FROM THE FAA PURSUANT TO THE FAA’S FORM-7460
OBSTRUCTION ANALYSIS REVIEW PROCESS, PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPROVAL, AS PER PLANS APPROVED BY
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

E. IF DETERMINED NECESSARY BY THE PHOENIX ARCHAEOLOGY
OFFICE, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT PHASE I DATA TESTING
AND SUBMIT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING,
LANDSCAPE SALVAGE, AND/OR GRADING APPROVAL.

F. IF PHASE I DATA TESTING IS REQUIRED, AND IF, UPON REVIEW OF
THE RESULTS FROM THE PHASE I DATA TESTING, THE CITY
ARCHAEOLOGIST, IN CONSULTATION WITH A QUALIFIED
ARCHAEOLOGIST, DETERMINES SUCH DATA RECOVERY
EXCAVATIONS ARE NECESSARY, THE APPLICANT SHALL CONDUCT
PHASE II ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA RECOVERY EXCAVATIONS.
Page 451
G. IN THE EVENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED
DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPER SHALL IMMEDIATELY
CEASE ALL GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WITHIN A 33-FOOT
RADIUS OF THE DISCOVERY, NOTIFY THE CITY ARCHAEOLOGIST,
AND ALLOW TIME FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY OFFICE TO PROPERLY
ASSESS THE MATERIALS.

H. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM.
THE WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

3.CP/BP.3 – Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.3

SIZE: 23.88 ACRES
USES PERMITTED: PERMITTED USES SHALL BE AS INDICATED IN SECTION 626,
COMMERCE PARK DISTRICT (BUSINESS PARK OPTION), OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, AS MODIFIED BELOW.

APPLICABLE ZONING: CP/BP AS PER SECTION 626 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX
ZONING ORDINANCE AS MODIFIED BELOW AND PER SECTION C.4.D OF THIS
CHAPTER. THIS ZONING WAS APPLIED UPON CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE
1995 MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE DESERT RIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN RELATING TO
THIS SUPERBLOCK.

I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS:

1. COMMERCE PARK USES ARE ALLOWED SUBJECT TO THE STANDARDS
DESCRIBED IN SECTION C.4.D OF THIS CHAPTER.

2. ADDITIONAL PERMITTED USES/DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS: THE
FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE PERMITTED USES
INCLUDED IN SECTION 626, COMMERCE PARK DISTRICT (BUSINESS PARK
OPTION), OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE WHICH SHALL
APPLY EXCLUSIVELY TO DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.3:

A. MANUFACTURING RELATED TO MEDICAL, PHARMACEUTICAL AND
BIOTECHNICAL PRODUCTS OR EQUIPMENT. MANUFACTURING
SHALL INCLUDE THE FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLY OF FINISHED
PRODUCTS OR SUB-ASSEMBLIES, SO LONG AS THE PRIMARY USE
OF THE PROPERTY IS NOT THE BASIC PROCESSING AND
COMPOUNDING OF RAW MATERIALS OR FOOD PRODUCTS.

B. MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

C. RETAIL USES. THE MAXIMUM GROSS LEASABLE AREA FOR ANY
ONE TENANT/USER SHALL BE 5,000 SQUARE FEET. THE MAXIMUM
AGGREGATE GROSS LEASABLE AREA OF RETAIL USES SHALL BE
50,000 SQUARE FEET.

3. BUILDING SETBACKS: MINIMUM 100 FEET AND AN AVERAGE OF 125 FEET
FROM 56TH STREET, 64TH STREET AND MAYO BOULEVARD. MINIMUM 50
Page 452
FEET FROM ALL OTHER STREETS. MINIMUM 30 FEET FROM ALL OTHER
LOT LINES.

4. FLOOR AREA RATIO: 0.20 OVERALL LIMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT PARCEL;
INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENTS MAY BE UP TO 0.25.

5. DENSITY: MINIMUM 17.0 DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE.

SUPERBLOCK 3 – OVERALL DESIGN GUIDELINES

THE FOLLOWING DESIGN GUIDELINES FROM SECTION 507 TAB A OF THE
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL BE ELEVATED FROM CONSIDERATIONS (C)
AND PRESUMPTIONS (P) TO REQUIREMENTS (R):

A. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT.

1. DESERT PRESERVATION.

(1.1) DEVELOPMENT SHALL MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING
HEALTHY SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION (TREES OVER 4" CALIPER IN
DIAMETER) AND CACTI OVER 3' IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY NATIVE
PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS (TABLE 1). IF REMOVAL IS
NECESSARY, MATURE TREES AND CACTI SHALL BE SALVAGED AND
UTILIZED ON SITE. (R)

PROTECTED NATIVE PLANTS SHALL MEAN CACTI, WHICH ARE THREE (3)
FEET, OR GREATER IN HEIGHT AND TREES WHICH ARE FOUR (4) INCHES
OR GREATER IN CALIPER OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIES:

TABLE 1. PROTECTED NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS

TREES:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
ACACIA CONSTRICTA WHITETHORN ACACIA
ACACIA GREGGII CATCLAW ACACIA
BERBERIS HAEMATOCARPA RED BARBERY
CANOTIA HOLOCANTHA CRUCIFIXION THORN
CELTIS PALLIDA HACKBERRY
CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE
CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM FOOTHILL PALO VERDE
CHILOPSIS LINERARIS DESERT WILLOW
JUNIPERUS SPECIES JUNIPER
OLNEYA TESOTA IRONWOOD
POPULUS FREMONTII COTTONWOOD
PROSOPIS SPECIES MESQUITE
QUERCUS SPECIES SCRIB OAK
RHUS OVATA SUGAR SUMAC
VAUQUELINEA CALIFORNICA ARIZONA ROSEWOOD
CACTI:
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME


Page 453
CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA SAGUARO
FEROCACTUS SPECIES BARREL
FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS OCOTILLO
PENICEREUS GREGGII NIGHT-BLOOMING CEREUS

2. GRADING/DRAINAGE.

(2.2) SURFACE, SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
AVOID HARD LINED CHANNELS. (R)

(2.3) SURFACE SITE DRAINAGE AND RETENTION SHOULD BE INTEGRATED
WITH THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE DESIGN. (R)

(2.5) REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ADJACENT TO PERIMETER
STREETS MAY UTILIZE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FOR RETENTION
PROVIDED:

- A MAXIMUM 50% OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK IS DEVOTED
TO RETENTION.

- THE MAXIMUM DEPTH OF RETENTION WITHIN 20 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
IS 24-INCHES.

- SIDE SLOPES ARE A MAXIMUM 4:1 (R)

3. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) PLANT MATERIALS.

3.1.1 DEVELOPMENT SHOULD MINIMIZE THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING, NON-
NATIVE HEALTHY PLANTS (TREES 4" CALIPER IN DIAMETER) OR
GREATER) AND CACTI (6' HIGH OR GREATER). IF REMOVAL IS
NECESSARY, MATURE TREES SHOULD BE SALVAGED AND UTILIZED ON
SITE. (R)

3.1.3 LOW WATER USE PLANTS THAT REFLECT AND ENHANCE THE IMAGE
OF THE SONORAN DESERT SHALL BE USED. (R)

3.1.5 ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE TREATMENT SHALL BE COMPATIBLE
WITH AND RELATE TO ANY ESTABLISHED DISTINCTIVE CHARACTER IN
THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT AREA. (R)

3.1.9 COORDINATE SITE UTILITY ELEMENTS SUCH AS OVERHEAD POWER
LINES, TRANSFORMERS, METER BOXES, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AND
FIRE PROTECTION DEVICES, WITH LANDSCAPE DESIGN TO EFFECTIVELY
DIMINISH THE IMPACT OF SUCH ELEMENTS ON THE SITE CHARACTER. (R)

3.1.10 TREES SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
WALKWAYS, AND MULTI-USE TRAILS AND PATHS, TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM
OF 50 PERCENT SHADE AND A MINIMUM CANOPY CLEARANCE OF SIX
FEET EIGHT INCHES. (R)

3.1.11 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND COMFORT SHALL BE CONSIDERED

Page 454
WHEN SELECTING TREES AND PLANT MATERIAL. (R)

3.1.13 NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT MATURITY OR
10% OF THE NET LOT AREA, WHICHEVER IS LESS, SHALL BE PLANTED IN
TURF OR HIGH-WATER USE PLANTS. FUNCTIONAL TURF AREAS SUCH AS
IN PARKS, SCHOOLS, MULTIPLE-FAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY COMMON
AREAS, INDIVIDUAL SINGLE-FAMILY LOT, AND GOLF COURSES ARE
EXEMPT. (R)

3.1.14 A MINIMUM 50% OF THE LANDSCAPED AREA AT MATURITY
(EXCLUDING HARDSCAPE AREAS) SHALL BE TREATED WITH LIVING
VEGETATION INCLUDING GROUNDCOVER, SHRUBS AND TREES, AS WELL
AS INORGANIC MATERIAL AND AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. (R)

3.1.15 IF ALLOWED BY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, THE PLACEMENT OF RECYCLING CONTAINERS IN A
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK OR REQUIRED LANDSCAPED ISLAND
SHALL NOT RESULT IN THE ELIMINATION OF ANY REQUIRED TREES. (R)

(3.2) MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE AREAS.

3.2.1 NATIVE SONORAN DESERT VEGETATION SHALL NOT BE PRUNED OR
REMOVED FROM AREAS IDENTIFIED ON APPROVED PLANS AS
PERMANENT UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE UNLESS DEMONSTRATED TO
THE CITY THAT A HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE ISSUE EXISTS. THIS
INCLUDES REMOVAL OF DEAD TREES OR CACTI. (R)

3.2.3 A PERMANENT AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE
INSTALLED TO WATER ALL TREES, CACTI, AND PLANTS INSTALLED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLANS OR OTHER
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DOCUMENTS TO MINIMIZE MAINTENANCE AND
WATER CONSUMPTION, AND TO MAXIMIZE PLANT HEALTH,
SURVIVABILITY, AND VIABILITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. (R)

(3.4) ART/WATER ELEMENTS.

3.4.1 WATER FEATURES, INCLUDING FOUNTAINS, SHALL BE SITED TO
ALLOW SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT PRIMARILY TO
ON-SITE AND INCIDENTALLY TO OFF-SITE USERS AND TO MINIMIZE
WATER CONSUMPTION. (R)

3.4.2 IF THERE IS PUBLIC ART, IT SHALL BE INTEGRATED INTO THE
OVERALL DESIGN OF A PROJECT. (R)

4. OPEN SPACE/AMENITIES.

(4.1) IMPROVED OPEN SPACES, PLAZAS AND COURTYARDS SHALL BE
SHADED A MINIMUM 50 PERCENT AND FUNCTIONAL IN TERMS OF AREA,
DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND AMENITIES TO PROMOTE SAFE HUMAN
INTERACTION. (R)

(4.2) USABLE PUBLIC SPACE SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM OF 50
PERCENT SHADING THROUGH THE USE OF TREES OR STRUCTURES THAT
Page 455
PROVIDE SHADING, OR A COMBINATION OF THE TWO UNLESS
OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES OR OTHER
TECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS. (R)

6. PARKING/CIRCULATION.

(6.1) SURFACE PARKING DESIGN.

6.1.3 PARKING AREAS SHALL BE BUFFERED FROM ADJACENT
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND SCREENED FROM STREETS SO THAT
CARS ARE NOT VISIBLE BELOW THE AVERAGE HEIGHT OF THE
HEADLIGHTS. (R)

6.1.7 SURFACE PARKING DESIGN SHALL UTILIZE SHARED ACCESS DRIVES
WITH ADJACENT, SIMILARLY ZONED PROPERTIES. (R)

6.1.9 EXCESSIVE ASPHALT/HARDSCAPE NOT NEEDED FOR ADEQUATE
VEHICULAR MANEUVERING OR PARKING, STAGING OR MATERIAL
STORAGE SHALL BE MINIMIZED. (R)

(6.2) PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN.

6.2.3 THE PARKING STRUCTURE EXTERIOR SHALL BE FINISHED WITH
ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND DETAILING THAT WILL CREATE
VISUAL INTEREST FOR ADJOINING PROPERTIES. (R)

6.2.4 LIGHTING WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE SHALL PROVIDE
SAFETY AND SECURITY AND BE INTEGRATED INTO THE ARCHITECTURAL
CHARACTER BOTH IN TERMS OF ILLUMINATION AND FIXTURES. (R)

6.2.7 APPROPRIATE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
AT EXITS AND ENTRANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL PARKING
STRUCTURES. (R)

6.2.10 THERE SHALL BE A CONVENIENT, CLEAR, SAFE AND EFFICIENT
INTERNAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE FOR
BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC INCLUDING APPROPRIATE
SIGNAGE AND PLACEMENT OF PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION CORES
(ELEVATORS AND STAIRS). (R)

(6.3) ACCESS/CIRCULATION.

6.3.2 THE SITE PLAN SHALL CLEARLY EXPRESS THE SEPARATION
BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. (R)

7. WALLS/FENCING.

(7.1) WALLS ADJACENT TO ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS SHALL
HAVE A FINISHED APPEARANCE. UNTEXTURED, UNFINISHED BLOCK AND
REINFORCED, MORTAR-FREE CONCRETE WALLS SHALL BE AVOIDED. (R)

(7.2) WALL LENGTHS EXCEEDING 50 FEET ADJACENT TO ARTERIAL AND
COLLECTOR STREETS SHALL BE ARTICULATED OR CONTAIN
SUBSTANTIAL LANDSCAPING TO BREAK THE CONTINUOUS WALL
Page 456
SURFACE AND CREATE VARYING SHADING PATTERNS. (R)

8. SITE LIGHTING.

(8.1) ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO PREVENT DIRECT
VISIBILITY OF THE LIGHT SOURCE FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY. (R)

(8.2) LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED WITH CUT-OFF FIXTURES AND
DEFLECTORS TO DIRECT LIGHT DOWNWARD AND LIMIT ON-SITE
LIGHTING LEVELS TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE (1) FOOT CANDLE AT THE
PROPERTY LINE. (R)

(8.5) SERVICE AREAS AND OTHER SCREENED AREAS SHALL HAVE
PROPER SECURITY LIGHTING. (R)

(8.6) LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ILLUMINATION SHALL BE OF SIMILAR
DESIGN AND CHARACTER AS THE PROJECT’S BUILDING COMPONENTS.
(R)

(8.7) SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE PERSONAL SAFETY
AT BUILDING ENTRANCE/EXITS, AND IN PUBLIC ASSEMBLY AND PARKING
AREAS. (R)

(8.8) RECOMMENDED LIGHTING LEVELS AND UNIFORMITY RATIOS
ESTABLISHED BY THE ILLUMINATION ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF NORTH
AMERICA (IESNA), AS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX, SHALL
BE INCORPORATED IN LIGHTING DESIGN FOR ON-SITE NON-RESIDENTIAL
AND MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. (R)

B. BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION.

1. PLACEMENT/ORIENTATION.

(1.2) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT THE
ORIENTATION OF SURROUNDING BUILDINGS AND SURROUNDING
STREETS BY MAINTAINING CONTINUITY OF PEDESTRIAN ROUTES AND
PROMOTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEDESTRIAN INTERACTION AT THE
STREET LEVEL. (R)

(1.4) THE PROPOSED BUILDING ORIENTATION SHALL RESPECT CLIMATIC
CONDITIONS BY MINIMIZING HEAT GAIN AND CONSIDERING THE IMPACT
OF SHADE ON ADJACENT LAND USES AND AREAS. (R)

(1.5) NATURAL SURVEILLANCE SHALL BE MAXIMIZED IN PROJECT DESIGN
TO ENCOURAGE EASY OBSERVATION OF PEOPLE AND PROPERTY NEAR
ENTRYWAYS, PATHWAYS, PUBLIC SPACES AND PARKING LOTS. (R)

(1.6) PROJECTS OR PORTIONS OF PROJECTS IN PUBLIC VIEW (ADJACENT
TO STREETS AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS) SHALL DEMONSTRATE A
GREATER LEVEL OF DESIGN SENSITIVITY AND DETAIL TO VISUAL IMAGE
THAN OTHER DEVELOPMENT. (R)

2. HEIGHT, BULK, AND AREA.


Page 457
(2.2) PARAPET WALLS SHALL NOT EXTEND BEYOND THE BUILDING
HEIGHT MORE THAN FIVE FEET (5') FOR A BUILDING THAT IS TWENTY
FEET (20') OR LESS IN HEIGHT OR SEVEN FEET (7') FOR A BUILDING ABOVE
TWENTY FEET IN HEIGHT UNLESS GREATER HEIGHT IS NEEDED TO
SCREEN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. (R)

3. ARCHITECTURE.

(3.1) ARCHITECTURE AND APPLIED TREATMENTS THAT EXPRESS
CORPORATE IDENTITY SHALL BE TEMPERED TO PROVIDE UNIQUE
STRUCTURES THAT COMPLIMENT AND BLEND WITH THEIR IMMEDIATE
CONTEXT. (R)

(3.2) PARKING SHADE AND CANOPY STRUCTURES SHALL BE
COMPLIMENTARY TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE PRIMARY BUILDINGS
AND HAVE MINIMAL VISUAL IMPACT TO THE PUBLIC STREETSCAPE AND
ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS. (R)

4. ARTICULATION.

(4.1) BUILDING FACADES VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC STREETS AND ADJACENT
TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT EXCEED 100-FEET SHALL CONTAIN
ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENTS AND DETAILING SUCH AS TEXTURAL
CHANGES, PILASTERS, OFFSETS, RECESSES, WINDOW FENESTRATION,
SHADOW BOXES AND OVERHEAD/CANOPIES. (R)

(4.2) THE BUILDING FACADE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A SENSE
OF HUMAN SCALE AT GROUND LEVEL BY PROVIDING A CLEAR
ARCHITECTURAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR LEVELS AND
ALL ADDITIONAL LEVELS. (R)

(4.3) BUILDING ENTRANCES SHALL BE IDENTIFIABLE AND DIRECTLY
ACCESSIBLE FROM A PUBLIC SIDEWALK. (R)

5. COLORS/MATERIALS.

(5.1) ALL SIDES OF A STRUCTURE SHALL EXHIBIT DESIGN CONTINUITY
AND CONTAIN MULTIPLE EXTERIOR ACCENT MATERIALS THAT EXHIBIT
QUALITY AND DURABILITY. EXAMPLES INCLUDE MATERIALS SUCH AS
BRICK, STONE, COLORED TEXTURED CONCRETE OR STUCCO. ROOF
MATERIALS MAY INCLUDE TREATED METAL, CONCRETE, AND CLAY TILES,
DECORATIVE WOOD, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS. (R)

(5.2) MULTIPLE BUILDINGS ON THE SAME SITE SHALL BORROW AND
INCORPORATE (NOT DUPLICATE) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES, MATERIALS,
FORMS, FEATURES, COLORS AND COMPATIBLE ELEMENTS FROM THE
SAME SITE. THESE SHALL INCLUDE: CONTINUATION OF DISTINCTIVE
ROOFLINES, COVERED WALKWAY ALIGNMENTS, CONSISTENT DETAILING
OF FINISH, ACCENT FEATURES ON ALL VISIBLE SIDES OF STRUCTURES,
COMPATIBLE SHAPES, MATERIAL, WALL AND LANDSCAPING TREATMENT.
(R)

(5.3) THE EXTENSIVE USE OF THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL
TREATMENTS AND DETAILS ARE STRONGLY DISCOURAGED AND SHALL
Page 458
BE LIMITED IN THEIR PROPOSED APPLICATION:

- COLORED PLASTIC OR FIBERGLASS

- SHINY METAL DETAILS OR REFLECTIVE MATERIALS

- UNTEXTURED CONCRETE, UNFINISHED BLOCK, STEEL PANELS, OR
ASPHALT SHINGLES AS A PREDOMINANT EXTERIOR MATERIAL. (R)

(5.4) CORPORATE COLORS, ASSOCIATED GRAPHICS, AND HIGHLY
CONTRASTING BANDS OF VIBRANT COLORS ON BUILDINGS AND ON
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (EXCLUDING SIGNAGE) SHALL BE USED AS AN
ACCENT FEATURE WITH RESTRAINT AS A MINOR ELEMENT OF THE
BUILDING’S EXTERIOR. (R)

(5.5) PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDINGS VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC
STREETS OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 30% OF
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS COMPOSED OF ALTERNATIVE BUILDING
MATERIALS SUCH AS GLASS, BRICK, MASONRY, STONE AND STUCCO. (R)

6. PUBLIC AMENITIES/ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.

(6.1) PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND GATHERING
AREAS SHALL BE SHADED (MINIMUM 50 PERCENT AT MATURITY) FOR THE
HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF PEDESTRIANS AND TO ENCOURAGE
USE. (R)

(6.2) OVERHANGS AND CANOPIES SHALL BE INTEGRATED IN THE
BUILDING DESIGN ALONG ALL PEDESTRIAN THOROUGHFARES. FOR
PLANNED COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTERS WITH EXTERIOR
PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION, CONTINUOUS SHADE PROTECTED
WALKWAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED. (R)

(6.3) THERE SHALL BE CONVENIENT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN
WALKWAYS BETWEEN BUS STOP/SHELTER AND THE BUILDING ENTRY
AND/OR ACTIVITY AREA(S). (R)

7. SCREENING.

(7.1) SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED AWAY FROM PUBLIC VIEW. (R)

(7.3) ALL SCREENING SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY COMPATIBLE WITH
THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. (R)

(7.5) ALL NEW OR RELOCATED ELECTRIC LINES 12 KV AND SMALLER,
COMMUNICATIONS AND CABLE TELEVISION AND ALL ON PREMISE WIRING
SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND IN ALL DEVELOPMENTS WHERE
VISIBLE FROM STREETS OR ADJOINING PROPERTIES. (R)

ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES.

THE FOLLOWING ARE ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES APPLICABLE TO ALL
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SUPERBLOCK 3, USING THE SAME IMPLEMENTATION
STANDARDS PER SECTION 507.C OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE:
Page 459
1. A MAXIMUM OF 60% OF EXTERIOR BUILDING FACADES SHALL BE
FINISHED WITH STUCCO MATERIAL. (R)

2. LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
SIDEWALKS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS PER
SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE. (R)

3. LIGHTING SHOULD BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO ALL MULTI-USE TRAILS
PER SECTION 1304.H.5 OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE. (P)

4. WHERE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS CROSS A VEHICULAR PATH, THE
PATHWAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DECORATIVE PAVERS, STAMPED
OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR OTHER PAVEMENT TREATMENTS, THAT
VISUALLY CONTRASTS PARKING AND DRIVE AISLE SURFACES. (R)

5. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE DECORATIVE
PAVERS, STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, OR SIMILAR ALTERNATIVE
MATERIAL. (R)

6. PRIMARY ENTRY/EXIT DRIVES SHALL INCORPORATE ENHANCED
LANDSCAPING ON BOTH SIDES WITHIN MINIMUM 250-SQUARE-FOOT
LANDSCAPE AREAS AND SHALL INCORPORATE A MINIMUM 5-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE MEDIAN, PLANTED WITH A VARIETY OF AT LEAST THREE
PLANT MATERIALS, AND MINIMUM 2-INCH CALIPER SINGLE-TRUNK LARGE
CANOPY DROUGHT-TOLERANT SHADE TREES PLANTED 20 FEET ON
CENTER OR IN EQUIVALENT GROUPINGS WITH THE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN.
(R)

7. TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL SITE ENTRIES
AND EXITS TO SLOW DOWN VEHICULAR SPEEDS AS THEY APPROACH
SIDEWALKS. (R)

8. INTERIOR WALLS AND PRIVACY FENCING SHALL USE MATERIALS AND
COLORS THAT BLEND WITH THE NATURAL DESERT ENVIRONMENT. (R)

9. A COMBINATION OF VIEW WALLS/FENCING AND PARTIAL VIEW
WALLS/FENCING SHALL BE INCORPORATED ALONG PROPERTY LINES
ADJACENT TO DEDICATED PUBLIC OR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREAS,
NATURAL AND/OR IMPROVED DRAINAGEWAYS OR RECREATIONAL
AREAS. (R)

10. DRAINAGE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO LOOK NATURAL IN THE
DESERT SETTING THROUGH COLOR, TEXTURE, LANDSCAPING, OR
OTHER MEANS. (R)

11. ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED AT ALL PUBLIC STREET CROSSING LOCATIONS TO
INTERCONNECT THE PEDESTRIAN TRAILS THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRETY
OF THE SITE. (R)

12. WASTE STATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE A COMPOST RECEPTACLE
WHENEVER POSSIBLE, WITH INFORMATIONAL SIGNS INDICATING WHAT
TYPE OF WASTE SHOULD GO IN WHICH RECEPTACLE. (P)
Page 460
***

Amend Appendices A.2 (Plant Lists), Page A-2 as follows:

***

A.2 Plant Lists

The Staff Recommended Plant List was prepared by the City of Phoenix Planning Department
staff with assistance from the staff botanist/horticulturalist in the Water Conservation and
Resources Division of the Water and Wastewater Department. The list includes a combination
of native and introduced plants that are suitable to the Sonoran Desert. Suitability includes
drought tolerance and mature height similar to Sonoran Desert vegetation. These plants were
also selected for their adaptability to the climatic conditions, lower winter nighttime temperatures
and more frequent frosts in Area C.

A Supplemental Plant List is included which identifies six specific development areas in the
Desert Ridge project. In each of the six development areas, additional plant materials are listed
that can be used to supplement the recommended plant list. Compliance with the Desert Ridge
Plant List and the Supplemental Plant List will be enforced by the Desert Ridge Review Board.
Tall palm trees (i.e., Date Palm, Fan Palm, Mexican Blue Palm) shall be located only in the
Village Core, and resort areas;, SUPERBLOCK 3 DEVELOPMENT PARCELS, AND parcels
4RH and 5A.

***

Amend Appendices A.2 (Plant Lists. Supplemental Plant List), Page A-9 as follows:

***

SUPERBLOCK 3

PALMS

DATE PALMS

TREES

HERITAGE LIVE OAK
EVERGREEN ELM
RED PUSH PISTACHE

***

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz 602-602-291-2559, TTY use 7-1-1




Page 461



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-4-23-2 (Mayo
Clinic PUD) - Approximately 530 Feet South of the Southwest Corner of 64th
Street and Mayo Boulevard (Ordinance G-7180)

Request to hold a public hearing and amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section
601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning Application Z-4-23-2
and rezone the site from R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD) (Single-Family Residence
District) (Approved Commerce Park, Business Park Option, Planned Community
District) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow commercial/commerce-business
park uses.

Summary
Current Zoning: R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD)
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 76.76 acres
Proposal: Commercial/Commerce-Business Park uses

Owner: Mayo Clinic Arizona
Applicant/Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval per Addendum A, subject to stipulations.
VPC Information Only: The Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case
on April 4, 2023, for information only.
VPC Action: The Desert Village Planning Committee heard this case on May 2, 2023,
and continued the case, by a vote of 9-0. The Desert View Village Planning Committee
heard this case on June 6, 2023, and continued the case, by a vote of 10-0. The
Desert View Village Planning Committee heard this case on Aug. 1, 2023, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation (Addendum A), by a vote
of 9-2.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on Oct. 5, 2023, and
recommended approval, per the Addendum B Staff Report, by a vote of 6-0.




Page 462

Location
Approximately 530 feet south of the southwest corner of 64th Street and Mayo
Boulevard
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: 6175 E. Mayo Blvd.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 463
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-4-23-2) FROM R1-18 (APPROVED CP/BP
PCD) (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT) (APPROVED
COMMERCE PARK DISTRICT, BUSINESS PARK OPTION,
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 76.76-acre property located approximately

530 feet south of the southwest corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard in a portion

of Section 33, Township 4 North, Range 4 East, as described more specifically in

Exhibit “A,” is hereby changed from “R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD)” (Single-Family

Residence District) (Approved Commerce Park District, Business Park Option, Planned

Community District) to “PUD” (Planned Unit Development).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”




Page 464
SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Mayo Clinic PUD reflecting the
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped July 20, 2023, as modified by the following stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add
the following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date].

b. Page 5, Purpose and Intent, A2: Overall Design Concept: Update map
image to indicate the ASU property (Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.3) is not
a part.

c. Page 6, Land Use Plan, B2: Conceptual Site Plan Summary, second
paragraph: Revise target of development from 3.3 million square feet to
2.17 million square feet.

d. Page 7, List of Uses: After the first paragraph, add a new paragraph
stating, “the following uses are separated into a “Base” section and an
“Enhanced” section. The “Base” section includes uses that would not
trigger additional requirements. The “Enhanced” section includes uses that
would trigger additional requirements, per Section D5 of this PUD”.

e. Page 7, List of Uses: Add a header “Base Permitted Uses” above A.

f. Page 7, List of Uses: Move the “Enhanced Permitted Uses” header above
B.

g. Page 7, List of Uses, B.: Replace with the following:

Non-residential uses permitted per Section 622, Commercial C-1 District,
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, subject to the following limitations:

1) Such uses are limited to no more than 500,000 square feet

2) The maximum gross floor area for any one tenant or user shall not
exceed 10,000 square feet




Page 465
h. Page 7, List of Uses: Add “Hospital” as a permitted use in the “Base”
section after B.

i. Page 7, List of Uses, Enhanced Permitted Uses: Delete text after
“multifamily residential” for D, delete E (single-family residential), delete “or
home” after community residence center, and re-letter accordingly.

j. Page 7, List of Uses, Enhanced Permitted Uses: Delete G “Biomedical and
medical research offices and/or laboratory” and re-letter accordingly.

k. Page 9, Development Standards: After the first paragraph, add a new
paragraph that states, “maximum building height and floor area ratio (FAR)
standards are separated into a “Base” section and an “Enhanced” section.
The “Base” section includes uses that would not trigger additional
requirements. The “Enhanced” section includes uses that would trigger
additional requirements, per section D5 of this PUD. All other development
standards apply for all type of development within the PUD.”

l. Page 9, Development Standards: Add a new development standard for
“maximum density” before “maximum building heights”, to say “Maximum
density: 200 dwelling units”, and re-letter accordingly.

m. Page 9, Development Standards, Floor Area Ratio, Enhanced FAR:
Replace 0.85 with 0.65.

n. Page 10, Development Standards, Bicycle Parking, 2: Delete the provision
for single-family residential uses and re-number accordingly.

o. Page 17, Design Guidelines, Enhanced Design Guidelines: Replace
“Enhanced” with “Elevated” in the title and add a paragraph before the first
paragraph that states “these design guidelines shall apply to all
development within the PUD.”

p. Page 17, Design Guidelines, Enhanced Design Guidelines, 1st paragraph:
Add “and (R*)” at the end of the paragraph, before the colon.

q. Page 18, Design Guidelines, Enhanced Design Guidelines,
Grading/Drainage, 2.3: Replace “should” with “shall”.

r. Page 18, Design Guidelines, Enhanced Design Guidelines, Landscape
Architecture, Plant Materials, 3.1.1: Replace “should” with “shall” in the
beginning and end of the sentence.

s. Page 20, Design Guidelines, Enhanced Design Guidelines,
Parking/Circulation, Parking Structure Design, 6.2.7: Delete this design
guideline.




Page 466
t. Page 22, Design Guidelines, Enhanced Design Guidelines, Building
Design/Construction, Architecture, 3.1: Replace “compliment” with
“complement”.

u. Page 22, Design Guidelines, Enhanced Design Guidelines, Building
Design/Construction, Architecture, 3.2: Replace “complimentary” with
“complementary”.

v. Page 17 – 24, Design Guidelines, Enhanced Design Guidelines: Replace
(R) with (R*) for design guidelines a.2.3, a.3.1.5, a.3.1.9, a.3.1.11, a.3.4.1,
a.3.4.2, a.4.1, a.6.1.9, a.6.2.3, a.6.2.4, a.6.2.10, a.6.3.2, a.7.1, a.7.2, a.8.5
through a.8.8, b.1.2 through b.5.5, and b.6.2 through b.7.5.

w. Page 24 – 25, Design Guidelines, Additional Design Guidelines: Replace
(R) with (R*) for design guidelines 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 through 11.

x. Page 27, Sustainability: Include the Green Stormwater Infrastructure and
Waste Stations provisions in the “Additional Design Guidelines” section.

2. A 10-foot-wide shared-use path easement (SUPE) shall be dedicated along the
east property line, adjacent to 64th Street, and a minimum 10-foot-wide shared-
use path (SUP) shall be constructed within the easement in accordance with the
MAG supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. The SUP may be provided in lieu of the required detached sidewalk
within the right-of-way if the landscape strip is provided per Section D1.I.2 of the
PUD Development Narrative.

3. A 10-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated adjacent to
the western edge of the PUD area, and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail
(MUT) shall be constructed within the easement to connect south to Reach 11
trails in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved or
modified by the Planning and Development Department.

4. Master plans, per the requirements of the Planned Community District (PCD),
Section 636 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted, and shall be
updated with each phase of development, as approved by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department. The
initial master plans submitted by the master developer shall include the following:

a. Complete build-out of detached sidewalks, landscape within landscape
strips, buffered bike lanes, and shared-use paths along 56th Street, Mayo
Boulevard and 64th Street per the Street Standards section of the PUD
Narrative, to be included on the Master Open Space, Pedestrian, Bicycle
and Trails Plan and the Master Landscape Plan.




Page 467
b. Complete build-out of bicycle repair stations per the Bicycle Infrastructure
section of the PUD Narrative, to be included on the Master Open Space,
Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trails Plan.

c. A Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Plan to include internal pedestrian
and bicycle circulation on site that enhances pedestrian and bicyclist
convenience, safety, and comfort.

5. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AO, on Panel
1315 L of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated January 4, 2021. The
following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department:

a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain boundary limits
on the Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that impacts to the
proposed facilities have been considered, following the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3). This
includes, but not limited to provisions in the latest versions of the
Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of the Street Transportation Department
for review and approval of Floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-
33) based on construction plans to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of Grading and Drainage permits.

d. The developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-
33) based on buildings under construction and a minimum 95%
compaction test results for the building pads to Floodplain Management for
approval prior to issuance of building permits.

e. The developer shall provide Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33)
based on finished construction to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

6. The developer shall submit Master Street Plans associated with the Traffic
Impact Analysis, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

7. The developer shall be responsible for design, redesign, and construction of all
warranted and affected traffic signals as identified by the approved Street
Transportation Department Traffic Impact Study and Master Street Plans by the
Street Transportation Department.

8. Roadway improvements, as stipulated, shall be installed in accordance with the
approved Master Street Plan and Traffic Impact Study approved phasing plan.



Page 468
9. Any proposed access to public right-of-way shall conform to the City-approved
Street Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines for location and spacing,
as approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department.

10. The developer shall construct all necessary roadway infrastructure improvements
as required by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) within ADOT
jurisdiction, as approved or modified by ADOT.

11. The developer shall be required to perfect existing right-of-way easements
controlled by the property as fee title, as approved or modified by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

12. The subject site shall conform to the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) land
sale, Application No. 53-122049, stipulations or subsequent development
agreements, as approved by the Street Transportation Department and the
Planning and Development Department.

13. The developer shall construct the ultimate 100-year storm event box culvert dry
crossing along arterial streets identified for construction by the approved Master
Street Plan to their full limits, including the construction of the upstream and
downstream maintenance access ramps.

14. The developer shall be responsible for all 404 permitting, environmental and
archeological assessments and associated easement dedications to construct
and maintain the ultimate box culvert dry crossing along arterial streets identified
for construction by the approved Master Street Plan.

15. Right-of-way shall be dedicated for 64th Street from the existing Arizona
Department of Transportation (ADOT) traffic interchange north to Deer Valley
Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. The
dedication shall consist of applicable slope and drainage easements from
existing interchange tapering to a minimum 140-foot right-of-way to Deer Valley
Road, as approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department and the
Planning and Development Department.

16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

17. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence and
operational characteristics of the Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future
owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall
be according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.



Page 469
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development that exceeds 70 feet in height from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s
Form-7460 obstruction analysis review process, prior to construction permit
approval, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department.

19. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

20. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I
data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.

21. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.

22. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 18th day of October,

2023.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:



Page 470
_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 471
EXHIBIT A

A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33,
TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. A PORTION OF THE LAND DESCRIBED AS LOT 7,
STATE PLAT NO.55, PARADISE RIDGE SECOND AMENDED, RECORDED IN BOOK
949, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 33, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 2003.76 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7, BOOK 949, PAGE 50,
RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA:
THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE, AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT
7, THE NEXT 3 COURSES, NOTH 54 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST,
A DISTANCE OF 763.76 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 75 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
1775.42 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
12.57 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7;
THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 7, NORTH 06 DEGREES 40
MINUTES 18 MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1125.04 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID SECTION 33,
THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, AND ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 89
DEGREES 56 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2220.22 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 3,349,195 SQUARE FEET OR 76.887 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.




Page 472
Page 473
ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report Z-4-23-2
Mayo Clinic PUD
July 24, 2023

Desert View Village Planning August 1, 2023
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 7, 2023
Request From: R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD) (Single-
Family Residence District) (Approved
Commerce Park District, Business Park
Option, Planned Community District) (76.76
acres)
Request To: PUD (Planned Unit Development) (76.76
acres)
Proposal: PUD to allow commercial / commerce-
business park uses
Location: Approximately 530 feet south of the
southwest corner of 64th Street and Mayo
Boulevard
Owner: Mayo Clinic Arizona
Applicant/Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


General Plan Conformity
Mixed-Use (Commercial / Commerce/
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
Business Park)
Street Map Classification 64th Street Arterial 0-foot west half street
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND
USE PRINCIPLE: Encourage development of taller and large buildings in Areas of
Change away from single-family and low-rise, multifamily housing.

The PUD will be located away from single-family and low-rise multifamily housing. The
existing vacant land to the east and the Reach 11 Park to the south serve as large
buffers between the site and existing single-family subdivisions.




Page 474
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

General Plan Conformity
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; CANAILS AND TRAILS; DESIGN
PRINCIPLE: Plan, design and develop pedestrian linkages between parks, open
spaces, village cores, neighborhood shopping centers, neighborhood schools, and
neighboring municipalities.

As stipulated, and as provided in the PUD Street Standards, the proposal will construct
pedestrian connections to the multi-use trail on the Reach 11 property, south of the site,
in addition to the shared-use path along the east side of the property to connect to the
overall Mayo Clinic development and to adjacent developments.

STRENGTHEN OUR LOCAL ECONOMY; JOB CREATION (EMPLOYERS); LAND
USE PRINCIPLE: Support General Plan Land Use Map and zoning changes that will
facilitate the location of employment generating uses in each of the designated
employment centers.

The PUD will permit land uses that will facilitate the location of employment generating
uses located within a major employment center within the Mayo Clinic campus.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPILE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

As stipulated, and as provided in the PUD Street Standards, the proposal integrates trees
and shade in the design, including enhanced landscaping around the perimeter of the
site, shaded detached sidewalks, and shaded pedestrian walkways.


Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Monarch Butterfly Pledge – See Background Item No. 10.
Phoenix Climate Action Plan – See Background Item No. 11.
Tree and Shade Master Plan – See Background Item No. 12.
Complete Streets Guiding Principles – See Background Item No. 13.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See Background Item No. 14.
Zero Waste PHX – See Background Item No. 15.
Transportation Electrification Action Plan – See Background Item No. 16.




Page 475
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023


Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning

Land Use Zoning

On Site Vacant R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD)
ASU Health Futures Center
North CP/BP DRSP
and vacant land
South Reach 11 recreation area R1-18
East (across 64th
Vacant, utility facility R1-18 (Approved R1-8 PCD)
Street)
West Mayo Clinic campus CP/BP DRSP

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone a 76.76-acre site located approximately 530 feet south of
the southwest corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard. The request is to rezone
from R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD) (Single-Family Residence District, Approved
Commerce Park District, Business Park Option, Planned Community District) to
PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow commercial / commerce – business
park and residential uses.

The subject site is within the larger 2,167-acre Paradise Ridge Planned
Community District (PCD). The Paradise Ridge PCD was originally rezoned in
1994 (Z-75-94-2) for the Arizona State Land Department to allow a variety of
residential, commercial and office along with a resort and golf course.

At the time the Paradise Ridge PCD was established, the subject property was
given the CP/BP (Commerce Park District, Business Park Option) zoning district.
Through this process of removing the PCD designation, the applicant has chosen
to use the PUD zoning district for the subject property instead in order to facilitate
a cohesive development for the Mayo Clinic campus. The subject property is along
the west edge of the Paradise Ridge PCD and is separated from the built-out
portion of the PCD to the east by vacant land which could serve as a buffer
between the subject property and the PCD.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
2. The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Mixed Use
(Commercial / Commerce/Business Park). The PUD proposal is consistent with the
General Plan Land Use Map designation as it would allow a mix of commercial,
commerce park and multifamily residential uses.




Page 476
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

The General Plan Land Use Map designations to the north and west of the site are
also Mixed Use (Commercial / Commerce/Business Park). The General Plan Land
Use Map designation to the east of the site (across 64th Street) is designated as
Residential 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre. The General Plan Land Use Map
designation to the south is Parks / Open Space – Publicly Owned.




General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USES
3. The subject site is vacant land zoned R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD) (Single-
Family Residence District, Approved Commerce Park District, Business Park
Option, Planned Community District) and is primarily surrounded by vacant land,
except for the ASU Health Futures Center to the north and the Mayo Clinic
Hospital to the west.

North of the site is the ASU Health Futures Center and vacant land, zoned CP/BP
DRSP (Commerce Park District, Business Park Option, Desert Ridge Specific
Plan).

East of the site is vacant land and a City lift station zoned R1-18 (Approved R1-8
PCD) (Single-Family Residence District, Approved Single-Family Residence
District, Planned Community District). Further to the east (approximately 460 feet
at its closest point) is a single-family residential subdivision zoned R1-18
(Approved R1-6 PCD and R1-8 PCD).




Page 477
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023


South of the site is the Reach 11 recreation area, zoned R1-18 (Single-Family
Residence District).

West of the site is the Mayo Clinic Hospital, zoned CP/BP DRSP (Commerce Park
District, Business Park Option, Desert Ridge Specific Plan).




Zoning Aerial Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

PROPOSAL
4. The proposal was developed utilizing the PUD zoning district. The Planned Unit
Development (PUD) is intended to create a built environment that is superior to
that produced by conventional zoning districts and design guidelines. Using a
collaborative and comprehensive approach, an applicant authors and proposes
standards and guidelines that are tailored to the context of a site on a case-by-
case basis. Where the PUD Development Narrative is silent on a requirement, the
applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions will be applied.

5. The PUD proposes standards that support the vision of a built environment that is
superior to that produced by conventional zoning districts and design guidelines,




Page 478
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

including enhanced landscaping and shading. The purpose of this PUD is to be a
tool that would allow the incorporation of this parcel, which is located outside of the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan, to be tied into the overall Mayo Clinic campus. This
PUD case is running concurrently with a text amendment to the Desert Ridge
Specific Plan for Superblock 3 (GPA-DSTV-1-23-2), which encompasses the Mayo
Clinic campus, to establish the same type of zoning entitlements across the overall
campus. Permitted uses, development standards and design guidelines are
intended to be the same across the campus in order to facilitate a cohesive
development. The plan for the campus is conceptual and the end users, the
overall site layout, and the building elevations are unknown at this time. The
applicant provided a land use plan and “Illustrative Images”, or images of existing
buildings throughout the Valley used as an inspiration for the desired architecture
of this campus. These are both attached as exhibits.

The PUD proposes a regulatory framework to promote investment surrounding the
existing Mayo Clinic Hospital, which is split into two sections to accommodate the
long-term growth of the campus – base permitted uses and development
standards, which includes the uses and standards already allowed with the
existing zoning entitlements of Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1 of the Desert Ridge
Specific Plan, and enhanced permitted uses and development standards, which
includes more intense zoning entitlements that can only be used upon complying
with certain conditions. The enhanced permitted uses and development standards
can only be used if the following conditions are met, which are identified in Section
D5 of the PUD:
1. Submittal and approval of a conceptual master development parcel site
plan for the overall Mayo Clinic campus with individual development unit
boundaries, floor area ratio calculations for each individual development
unit and the entire Mayo Clinic campus, proposed building heights,
proposed dwelling units, and land uses for each development unit.
2. Submittal and approval of conceptual master plans for the entire area with
regional roadway infrastructure improvements assigned to each
development unit.
3. Submittal and approval of a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prior to any
preliminary site plan approvals for the entire area.
4. Execution of conceptual master plans and a development agreement with
details of funding obligations for regional infrastructure improvements.

The General Plan designates a Shared-Use Path (SUP) along the east side of the
site, along the west side of 64th Street. The developer will be required to dedicate
a Shared-Use Path Easement (SUPE) along the east side of the site and construct
a SUP within the SUPE. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 2.

Staff recommends constructing a 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within a 10-
foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) adjacent to the western edge of the




Page 479
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

PUD site to provide connectivity to the Reach 11 trails to the south. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 3.
Master Plans will be required to be submitted as part of the overall Mayo Clinic
campus. Staff recommends the master plans include the complete build-out of
detached sidewalks, landscape within landscape strips, buffered bike lanes,
shared-use paths along 56th Street, Mayo Boulevard and 64th Street, bicycle
repair stations, and a Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Plan that includes internal
pedestrian and bicyclist circulation on site. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4.

6. Land Use
The PUD proposes a mixed-use development to include a range of Commerce
Park/Business Park, commercial, medical, multifamily residential and single-family
residential uses. The proposed uses are the same as the proposed permitted uses
in the Specific Plan Amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan for Superblock
3, Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1, split into base and enhanced permitted uses.

The base permitted uses includes uses permitted in the Commerce Park District
(Business Park Option) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, commercial uses
permitted in the Commercial C-1 District – Neighborhood Retail (Section 622) of
the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, and the manufacturing of medical, pharmaceutical,
and biotechnical products or equipment.

The enhanced permitted uses mainly includes uses currently permitted in
Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.2 of the Desert Ridge Specific Plan, in addition to
multifamily residential uses up to the R-5 Multifamily Residence District standards,
single-family residential up to the R-3 Multifamily Residential District standards,
and mobile food vending as an accessory use.

7. Development Standards
The PUD proposes development standards, consistent with the vision of a
pedestrian-oriented mixed-use development, the same as the proposed
development standards in the Specific Plan Amendment to the Desert Ridge
Specific Plan for Superblock 3, Development Parcel 3.CP/BP.1, split into the base
and enhanced development standards. The base development standards include
a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.20 overall for the development parcel and a FAR of
0.25 for individual developments. Additionally, a maximum building height of 56
feet, exclusive of rooftop mechanical facilities and associated screening, is
permitted. On top of these base development standards, additional standards
were added to enhance the overall development of the campus, including
standards for minimum open space, detached sidewalks, shared-use paths, a
multi-use trail, minimum landscaping, electric vehicle (EV) parking, bicycle
infrastructure, minimum shade, green stormwater infrastructure, and recycling. A
condition of approval for use of the base section was also added to clarify that
master plans for the overall campus are required and must be updated with each
phase of development.




Page 480
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023


The enhanced development standards include an FAR of 0.85 for the overall
development parcel and a maximum building height of 250 feet (limited to 10
percent of the net area of the development parcel), a maximum building height of
70 feet (limited to 75 percent of the net area of the development parcel), and a
maximum building height of 35 feet (limited to 15 percent of the net area of the
development parcel).

Below are the base development standards from the PUD Narrative:

Maximum Building Height 56 feet
Minimum Building Setbacks 64th Street: 100 feet, average 125
All other public streets: 50 feet
Private streets: 25 feet
Interior lot lines: 0 feet
Reach 11: 65 feet
Lot Coverage Maximum 50%
Common Open Space Minimum 10% of gross area, allocated
throughout
Vehicular Parking Off-street parking and loading
requirements may be modified by the
Planning and Development Department
when supported by an appropriately
documented study.

Minimum 2.5% of required parking spaces
shall be Electric Vehicle (EV) Installed
spaces

Minimum 2.5% of required parking spaces
shall be EV Ready spaces
Bicycle Infrastructure Bike lanes, bike boulevards, or other bike
visibility infrastructure shall be provided
throughout the development to provide
bicycle circulation throughout

Bicycle parking shall be provided per the
requirements of Section 1307.H.6 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, in addition to
the following. Bicycle parking shall be
provided through Inverted U and artistic
racks located near all building entrances,
or as otherwise specified below, and
installed per the requirements of Section
1307.H.




Page 481
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023


1) Multifamily residential: secured
bicycle parking spaces at a
minimum rate of 0.25 spaces per
dwelling unit and guest bicycle
parking spaces at a minimum rate of
0.05 spaces per dwelling unit
2) Single-family residential uses: 0.05
spaces per dwelling unit, located in
improved open space areas


Bicycle repair stations (“fix it stations”) shall
be provided, maintained and evenly
distributed throughout the development
parcel and shall be located adjacent to
sidewalks, walkways, shared-use paths
and multi-use trails, spaced a minimum of
a quarter mile apart. The bicycle repair
stations (“fix it stations”) shall be provided
in an area of high visibility and separated
from vehicular maneuvering areas, where
applicable. The repair station shall include,
but not be limited to:

1) Standard repair tools affixed to the
station.
2) A tire gauge and pump affixed to the
base of the station or the ground.
3) A bicycle repair stand which allows
pedals and wheels to spin freely
while making adjustments to the
bike.
A minimum of 10% of the required bicycle
parking spaces shall include standard
electrical receptacles, or standard electric
outlets for secured bicycle parking, for
electric bicycle charging capabilities.

8. Landscape Standards
The PUD proposes landscaping which includes more vegetative live coverage,
larger tree caliper sizes along the streetscape and within landscape setbacks, and




Page 482
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

enhanced shade standards, including a minimum of 75 percent of public
sidewalks, shared-use paths, bicycle parking spaces and bicycle repair stations to
be shaded and a minimum of 50 percent of multi-use trails and bike lanes to be
shaded at summer solstice at noon. The proposal includes shade and landscape
planting standards that are an enhancement compared to the conventional
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance standards.

9. Design Guidelines and Standards
The PUD proposes elevating many of the design guidelines in Section 507 Tab A
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance from either Considerations (C) or Presumptions
(P) to Requirements (R), in addition to adding several other design guidelines
using the same implementation standards as Section 507 Tab A. The proposed
design guidelines are an enhancement compared to the conventional design
guidelines of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and will guide development with an
overall better design. Design precent images, attached as an exhibit, were
provided to exemplify the anticipated design of the Mayo Clinic campus once end
users are known in the future.

PLANS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND INITIATIVES
10. Monarch Butterfly Pledge
In April 2021, Mayor Kate Gallego signed the National Wildlife Federation's
Mayor's Monarch Pledge. This pledge commits the city to take action to support
the monarch butterfly population. In the United States, loss of milkweed habitat is
a major factor in the decline of the monarchs. Arizona has at least 29 species of
milkweed native to the state. Adult monarchs feed on the nectar of many flowers,
but they breed only where milkweeds are found. To support the monarch butterfly
population, the PUD addresses the planting of milkweed shrubs, or other native
nectar plant species, on the subject site.

11. Phoenix Climate Action Plan
In October 2021, the Phoenix City Council approved the Climate Action Plan. The
Climate Action Plan will serve as a long-term plan to achieve greenhouse gas
emissions reductions and resiliency goals from local operations and community
activities as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change. This plan contains
policy and initiatives regarding stationary energy, transportation, waste
management, air quality, local food systems, heat, and water. Goal W2 (Water),
Action W2.4, pertains to the implementation of the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure (GI) and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater
Management to benefit the environment, promote water conservation, reduce
urban heat, improve the public health, and create additional green spaces. This
goal is addressed in the PUD Narrative, which requires a minimum of two GI
techniques for stormwater management to be implemented in this development.




Page 483
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

12. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Sidewalks on the street frontages should be detached from
the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide
thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect. The
PUD includes standards for detached sidewalks along 64th Street separated by a
landscape strip to include drought-tolerant shade trees placed 20 feet on center,
minimum 75 percent shade along public sidewalks and shared-use paths,
minimum 50 percent shade along public and private walkways and multi-use trails,
minimum 50 percent shade within public and private open space areas, minimum
25 percent shade in parking areas with drought-tolerant shade trees, minimum 50
percent shade for occupiable roof areas, minimum 75 percent shade for bicycle
repair stations and bicycle parking spaces, minimum 50 percent shade for bike
lanes, and shade at the corners of traffic lights for pedestrians. The PUD also
includes standards for larger caliper drought-tolerant shade trees within landscape
setbacks.

13. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To promote safety and connectivity for
all users, the PUD proposes standards for detached sidewalks along 64th Street
and along public and private local streets. Additionally, the PUD proposes a
shared-use path along 64th Street and enhanced treatments to streets shared by
bicyclists, as recommended by the Active Transportation Plan, to increase visibility
and safety to bicyclists, which is also addressed in Stipulation No. 2.

14. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its bikeway system and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-
term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. The PUD incorporates requirements for bicycle parking, street
treatments for increased bicyclist visibility and safety, and bicycle repair stations to
encourage multi-modal transportation.

15. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal
to become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance expand its recycling and other waste diversion
programs. The PUD proposes to provide waste stations to include a landfill




Page 484
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

receptacle and recycling receptacle, and compost receptacles, when possible, with
informational signs indicating what type of waste should go in which receptacle,
located at all building entrances/exits and allocated throughout the site in common
open spaces areas and along sidewalks, pedestrian walkways and shared-use
paths at convenient locations, typically within a quarter mile of each other.

16. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation Electrification
Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of transportation is
both a national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for better air quality, a
reduction in carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle operating and
maintenance costs. Businesses, governments and the public are signaling strong
future demand for electric vehicles (EVs), and many automobile manufacturers
have declared plans for a transition to fully electric offerings within the coming
decade. This Plan contains policy initiatives to prepare the City for a future filled
with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-mobility equity, and outlines a
roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV infrastructure needs of 280,000
EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan to accelerate public adoption of
electric vehicles through workplace, business, and multifamily charging
infrastructure recommends a standard stipulation for rezoning cases to provide EV
charging infrastructure. The PUD proposes standards to provide EV Installed and
EV Capable parking spaces and to provide standard electrical receptacles for
bicycle parking spaces and standard electrical outlets (for secured bicycle parking
spaces) for electric bicycle charging capabilities.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
17. At the time the staff report was written, staff has received one letter of opposition
regarding this proposal. The stated concerns are building height, lack of firm
development plans, infrastructure burdens on the City, property values, traffic,
noise, and inconsistency with neighborhood character.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
18. Community and Economic Development
The Community and Economic Development Department commented that they
are very supportive of this request.

19. Floodplain Management
Floodplain Management commented that the subject property is within a Special
Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), as designated by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) and is subject to inundation by a 100-year flood.
The subject property is within a SFHA called Zone AO. The architect or engineer is
required to show the floodplain boundary limits on the Grading and Drainage plan
and ensure that impacts to the proposed facilities have been considered, following
the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph
60.3), including the latest versions of the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City




Page 485
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

Code. The Grading and Drainage plan needs to be submitted to the Floodplain
Management section of the Street Transportation Department for review and
approval of floodplain requirements. An Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-
33) based on construction plans, based on buildings under construction and a
minimum 95% compaction test results for the building pads, and based on
finished construction must be provided to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of Grading and Drainage permits, prior to issuance of building
permits, and prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 5.

20. Water Services Department
The Water Services Department commented that the property has existing water
and sewer mains that can potentially serve the development. In addition, the
Water Services Department commented that capacity is a dynamic condition that
can change over time due to a variety of factors.

21. Street Transportation Department
The Street Transportation Department (STD) commented that STD and the
Planning and Development Department (PDD) have worked together closely to
draft components of the “Enhanced Permitted Uses and Development Standards”
section of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment text language for GPA-DSTV-1-
23-2, which was mirrored into the Mayo Clinic PUD. This section addresses initial
concerns from STD regarding intensity of the zoning entitlement request and
impact on the regional transportation system without a Traffic Impact Study (TIS)
having been submitted for review at this stage. STD also requested the following:
• That master plans associated with the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) be
submitted for review and approval.
• That the developer design and construct all warranted and affected traffic
signals as identified by the TIS and Master Street Plans.
• That roadway improvements be installed in accordance with the Master
Street Plan and TIS approved phasing plan.
• That any proposed access to public right-of-way conform to the City-
approved Street Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines for location
and spacing.
• That the developer construct all necessary roadway infrastructure
improvements as required by the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT) within ADOT jurisdiction.
• That the developer be required to perfect existing right-of-way easements
controlled by the property as fee title.
• That the site conform to Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) land sale
(Application No. 53-122049) stipulations or subsequent development
agreements.




Page 486
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

• That the developer construct the ultimate 100-year storm event box culvert
dry crossing along arterial streets identified for construction by the Master
Street Plan to their full limits, including the construction of the upstream and
downstream maintenance access ramps.
• That the developer be responsible for all 404 permitting, environmental and
archeological assessments and associated easement dedications to
construct and maintain the ultimate box culvert dry crossing along arterial
streets identified for construction by the Master Street Plan.
• That right-of-way be dedicated for 64th Street from the existing Arizona
Department of Transportation (ADOT) traffic interchange north to Deer
Valley Road and consist of applicable slope and drainage easements from
existing interchange tapering to a minimum 140-foot right-of-way to Deer
Valley Road.
• That all streets be constructed with all required elements and meet ADA
standards.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 6 through 16.

22. City of Scottsdale Aviation Department
The City of Scottsdale Aviation Department requested that the developer provide
notice to prospective purchasers of the existence and operational characteristics
of the Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) and provide documentation that Form
7460 has been filed with the FAA with an FAA response of “No Hazard
Determination”. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 17 and 18.

OTHER
23. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. If
further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site and
immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous archaeological
projects have been conducted within this project area, it is recommended that
archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted. Phase II
archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based upon the
results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this determination in
consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event archaeological
materials are encountered during construction, all ground disturbing activities must
cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery and the City of Phoenix Archaeology
Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess the
materials. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 19 through 21.

24. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by
the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to




Page 487
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

require the form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan
approval. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 22.

25. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may
be required.

Findings

1. The proposed PUD is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map designation
and compatible with the existing land use pattern in the surrounding area.

2. The proposed PUD will allow for development that will provide employment
opportunities in a designated employment center.

3. The proposed PUD sets forth design and development standards that will enhance
connectivity in the immediate vicinity by providing shaded detached sidewalks, a
shared-use path, and enhanced shading, visibility and safety for pedestrians and
bicyclists.

Stipulations

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Mayo Clinic Discovery Oasis PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of
this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped July 20, 2023, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date].

2. A 10-foot-wide shared-use path easement (SUPE) shall be dedicated along the east
property line, adjacent to 64th Street, and a minimum 10-foot-wide shared-use path
(SUP) shall be constructed within the easement in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
The SUP may be provided in lieu of the required detached sidewalk within the right-
of-way if the landscape strip is provided per Section D1.I.2 of the PUD Development
Narrative.




Page 488
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

3. A 10-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated adjacent to the
western edge of the PUD area, and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT)
shall be constructed within the easement to connect south to Reach 11 trails in
accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. Master plans, per the requirements of the Planned Community District (PCD), Section
636 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted, and shall be updated with
each phase of development, as approved by the Street Transportation Department
and the Planning and Development Department. The initial master plans submitted
by the master developer shall include the following:

a. Complete build-out of detached sidewalks, landscape within landscape
strips, buffered bike lanes, and shared-use paths along 56th Street, Mayo
Boulevard and 64th Street per the Street Standards section of the PUD
Narrative, to be included on the Master Open Space, Pedestrian, Bicycle
and Trails Plan and the Master Landscape Plan.

b. Complete build-out of bicycle repair stations per the Bicycle Infrastructure
section of the PUD Narrative, to be included on the Master Open Space,
Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trails Plan.

c. A Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Plan to include internal pedestrian
and bicycle circulation on site that enhances pedestrian and bicyclist
convenience, safety, and comfort.

5. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AO, on Panel 1315
L of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated January 4, 2021. The following
requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain boundary limits
on the Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that impacts to the proposed
facilities have been considered, following the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3). This includes, but
not limited to provisions in the latest versions of the Floodplain Ordinance
of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of the Street Transportation Department
for review and approval of Floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-
33) based on construction plans to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of Grading and Drainage permits.




Page 489
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023


d. The developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-
33) based on buildings under construction and a minimum 95% compaction
test results for the building pads to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of building permits.

e. The developer shall provide Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33)
based on finished construction to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

6. The developer shall submit Master Street Plans associated with the Traffic Impact
Analysis, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

7. The developer shall be responsible for design, redesign, and construction of all
warranted and affected traffic signals as identified by the Traffic Impact Study and
Master Street Plans, as approved or modified by the Street Transportation
Department.

8. Roadway improvements, as stipulated, shall be installed in accordance with the
approved Master Street Plan and Traffic Impact Study approved phasing plan, as
approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department.

9. Any proposed access to public right-of-way shall conform to the City-approved Street
Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines for location and spacing, as approved
or modified by the Street Transportation Department.

10. The developer shall construct all necessary roadway infrastructure improvements as
required by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) within ADOT
jurisdiction, as approved or modified by ADOT.

11. The developer shall be required to perfect existing right-of-way easements controlled
by the property as fee title, as approved or modified by the Street Transportation
Department and the Planning and Development Department.

12. The subject site shall conform to the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) land
sale, Application No. 53-122049, stipulations or subsequent development
agreements, as approved by the Street Transportation Department and the Planning
and Development Department.

13. The developer shall construct the ultimate 100-year storm event box culvert dry
crossing along arterial streets identified for construction by the Master Street Plan to
their full limits, including the construction of the upstream and downstream
maintenance access ramps, as approved or modified by the Street Transportation
Department and the Planning and Development Department.




Page 490
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

14. The developer shall be responsible for all 404 permitting, environmental and
archeological assessments and associated easement dedications to construct and
maintain the ultimate box culvert dry crossing along arterial streets identified for
construction by the Master Street Plan, as approved or modified by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

15. Right-of-way shall be dedicated for 64th Street from the existing Arizona Department
of Transportation (ADOT) traffic interchange north to Deer Valley Road, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. The dedication shall consist of
applicable slope and drainage easements from existing interchange tapering to a
minimum 140-foot right-of-way to Deer Valley Road, as approved or modified by the
Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

17. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence and
operational characteristics of the Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future owners
or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and
approved by the City Attorney.

18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis
review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

19. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing
and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

20. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I data
testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, determines
such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II
archeological data recovery excavations.

21. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology
Office to properly assess the materials.




Page 491
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 24, 2023

22. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application
file for record.

Writer
Adrian Zambrano
July 24, 2023

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch Map
Aerial Map
Conceptual Land Use Plan date stamped July 20, 2023
Illustrative Images date stamped July 20, 2023 (24 pages)
Correspondence (2 pages)
Mayo Clinic PUD Development Narrative date stamped July 20, 2023




Page 492
R-3A PCD
Z-87-03


CP/BP
MA PCD
YO Z-87-03
BLV
D



64TH ST
Desert Ridge
Specific Plan




HS
66T
L
TH
P
T
CP/BP PCD
Z-87-03

R1-8
PCD * PL
Z-75-94 R1-6
PCD * 66TH
Z-75-94
WAY

VILL 66TH
A RI
TA D
R

MAR
ISA
LN

R1-8
PCD*
Z-75-94
LIBB
YS
T




L ST
58 JO
TH HN
P RD




I
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD

LONE MOUNTAIN RD

Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD

0.1 0.05 0 0.1 Z-4-23
JOMAX RD


DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD

PINNACLE PEAK RD


CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2

CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR




BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD



TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST



SCOTTSDALE RD




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP
FROM:
R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD ( 76.76 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
1/26/2023
Z-4-23 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
76.76 Acres QS 38-42 M-12 TO: PUD ( 76.76 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD) 149 (N/A) 179 (N/A)
PUD N/A N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Page 493
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2023\Z-4-23.mxd
R-3A PCD
Z-87-03


CP/BP
MA PCD
YO Z-87-03
BLV
D



64TH ST
Desert Ridge
Specific Plan




HS
66T
L
TH
P
T
CP/BP PCD
Z-87-03

R1-8
PCD * PL
Z-75-94 R1-6
PCD * 66TH
Z-75-94
WAY

VILL 66TH
A RI
TA D
R

MAR
ISA
LN

R1-8
PCD*
Z-75-94
LIBB
YS
T




L ST
58 JO
TH HN
P RD
Maricopa County Assessor's Office




I
CAREFREE HWY
DOVE VALLEY RD

LONE MOUNTAIN RD

Miles
DYNAMITE BLVD

0.1 0.05 0 0.1 Z-4-23
JOMAX RD


DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
HAPPY VALLEY RD

PINNACLE PEAK RD


CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2

CAVE CREEK RD
DEER VALLEY DR




BLACK MTN PKY
SR-101
MAYO BLVD



TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST



SCOTTSDALE RD




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP
FROM:
R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD ( 76.76 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. DATE:
1/26/2023
Z-4-23 REVISION DATES:



GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
76.76 Acres QS 38-42 M-12 TO: PUD ( 76.76 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD) 149 (N/A) 179 (N/A)
PUD N/A N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
Page 494
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2023\Z-4-23.mxd


Framework Concept
and Program Zones
Paradise Ridge Ariz
ona
Sta
te R
out
e 10
56th Street

Proposed Development
Residence by
Marriott Phoenix Ma
yo
B ou
lev
ar
d



CITY OF PHOENIX
JUL 20 2023 Mayo Clinic 64th Street
Hospital PHX-1
Page 495
Planning & Development American
Department Express


ASU
Signalized Intersections
Mayo Paseo
Major Open Spaces
Desert Ridge
Washes
Plaza Paradise Ridge

Amenities / Mixed Use
Office
Wet Lab
Advanced Manufacturing
Outpatient Clinic N
Parking Garages
Surface Parking
Mayo Clinic Buildings (Ongoing)
Mayo Clinic Buildings (Existing) 0 1/4 mi 1/2 mi
CITY OF PHOENIX
Buildings: Amenity Hub
JUL 20 2023
Arizona Center / Gensler
Planning & Development
Department




Page 496




Buildings: Amenity Hub
Biltmore Fashion Park, Phoenix, AZ




Page 497




Buildings: Amenity Hub
Tempe Marketplace, Tempe, AZ




Page 498




Buildings: Commercial Office
Arizona State University, Biodesign Institute C / ZGF




Page 499




Buildings: Commercial Office
ASU Health Services Building / Lake|Flato




Page 500




Buildings: Paseo facing
Arizona State University, Biodesign Institute C / ZGF




Page 501




Buildings: Paseo facing
Arizona State University, Biodesign Institute C / ZGF




Page 502




Buildings: Paseo facing
ASU Health Services Building / Lake|Flato




Page 503




Buildings: Mayo Boulevard facing
Health Sciences Education Building, Phoenix / CO Architects




Page 504




Buildings: Mayo Boulevard facing
Health Sciences Education Building, Phoenix / CO Architects




Page 505




Buildings: Commercial Lab
ASU 850 Phoenix Bioscience Core / HKS




Page 506




Buildings: Commercial Lab
ASU 850 Phoenix Bioscience Core / HKS




Page 507




Buildings: Commercial Lab
University of Arizona Health Sciences Innovation Building, Tucson, AZ / CO Architects




Page 508




Buildings: Commercial Lab
ASU Bioscience Research Laboratories, Tucson, AZ / ZGF




Page 509




Buildings: Commercial Lab
ASU Bioscience Research Laboratories, Tucson, AZ / ZGF




Page 510




Buildings: Commercial Lab
ASU Global Futures Laboratory™ / Grimshaw Architects




Page 511




Landscape: Shade structures at Amenity Hubs
V&A Museum, London / University of Stuttgart




Page 512




Landscape: Shade structures at Amenity Hubs
Easytiger: Austin Beer Garden / FK Architects




Page 513




Landscape: Amenity Hub
Playa District, Los Angeles CA




Page 514




Landscape: Buffer areas / Trails
Grand Canalscape Multi-Use Trail, Phoenix, AZ




Page 515




Landscape: Shade structures at Parking / Walkways
Arizona State University - Tempe Campus PowerParasol™




Page 516




Buildings: Parking Structures
Washington University 560 Garage, St. Louis, MO / Clayco




Page 517




Buildings: Parking Structures
Penn State Health Westview Garage, Hershey, PA / Lamar Johnson Collaborative




Page 518




Buildings: Parking Structures
Phoenix Biomedical Campus / Watry Design, Inc.




Page 519




Adrian G Zambrano

From: Adrian G Zambrano
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 10:58 AM
To: Adrian G Zambrano
Subject: 2023-07-07 - Opposition - Carol Shilliday



From: carol shilliday
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 3:45 PM
To: PDD Long Range Planning ; Mayor Gallego ; Council
District 1 PCC ; Council District 2 PCC ; Council District
3 PCC ; Council District 4 ; Council District 5 PCC
; Council District 7 PCC ; Council District 8 PCC
; PDD PHO ; Anthony M Grande
; Racelle Escolar
Subject: Unprecedented Favor Granted for Zoning Case Z‐4‐23 at Taxpayer Expense


Subject: Concerns Regarding the Proposed Change in Zoning from Residential R-18 with
30 foot building height to PUD commercial use with 250 foot building height for Parcel
215-04-717: Zoning Case Z-4-23

To Whom It May Concern;

On behalf of the 265 homeowners in the Paradise Ridge Community, located less than
600 feet from the proposed zoning change, we write to express our deep concerns
regarding the proposed change in zoning from residential use R-18 with a maximum
height of 30 feet to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a height of 250 feet or more for
parcel 215-04-717, as requested by the Mayo Clinic. We firmly believe that this change in
zoning would deviate from the General Plan, negatively impacting the surrounding
community. The General Plan serves as a vital blueprint for guiding development and land
use in our city, and it clearly designates parcel 215-07-717 for residential
development. Mayo Clinic’s use of parcel 215-04-717 for commercial development with a
height of 250 feet, contradicts the specific land use as outlined.

Mayo Clinic has NOT come forward with firm plans, yet they seek a significant departure
from the residential use originally intended for parcel 215-04-717. This gives them
excessive developer influence, control and flexibility in designing and implementing their
projects without giving sufficient consideration to the long-term impacts on the
neighborhood or the needs of the existing community.

Moreover, the statements made during the Village Planning Committee meeting
suggesting that the project's approval has been pre-determined, and the zoning meetings
are merely a formality, are concerning. The city's extraordinary measures of waiving the
requirement for neighborhood meetings further compounds our apprehension about the
transparency and fairness of the process.

Page 520
Mayo Clinic's tax-exempt status as a non-profit organization raises concerns about the
impact on the city's revenue. Allowing the PUD designation on parcel 215-04-717 would
grant Mayo Clinic the opportunity to construct commercial buildings up to 250 feet tall
without fully considering the infrastructure cost burden on the city. As stated in the Village
Planning Meeting, Mayo Clinic will be requiring the city to expand 64th street without the
developer contributing to the cost for improvements. It is troubling that Mayo Clinic, as a
non-profit organization, seeks to transfer the burden of infrastructure costs to the City of
Phoenix, while enjoying tax exemptions that deprive the city of much-needed revenue.

At the same time Mayo Clinic uses tax exempt privileges, they plan to engage in for profit
activity. Their first project is a proposed land lease to an apartment developer that will be
able to build under Mayo’s proposed PUD zoning without the same constraints of the
surrounding development.

The proposed zoning change has already begun to affect property values in the area, as
residents face the prospect of towering 250-foot commercial buildings in their backyards,
in direct conflict with the intentions of the General Plan for residential use with a building
maximum of 30 feet. Distressed by these zoning changes, residents have started listing
their properties for sale, fearing the irreparable damage that could be inflicted upon our
community.

Rezoning from residential to commercial would have significant and adverse impacts on
our community. It would introduce increased traffic, noise, and disrupt the character and
aesthetics of our neighborhood. As homeowners, citizens and stakeholders, we firmly
believe that our concerns, interests and property values should be considered.

Moreover, why the massive departure from the General Plan intention for building height
no greater than 30 feet? It is a rare case that a city approves a large leap in zoning with
literally no planning in place.

Granting PUD zoning to Mayo Clinic would not only do harm to the surrounding
community, it rewards big organizations unprecedented favor not normally given to local
developers.



Thank you,

Carol Shilliday

Paradise Ridge Homeowners Association Board Member

18032 N. 65th Place

Phoenix, AZ 85054


Page 521
ATTACHMENT C




ADDENDUM A
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
July 31, 2023

Desert View Village Planning August 1, 2023
Committee Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date September 7, 2023

Request From: R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD) (Single-Family
Residence District) (Approved Commerce Park
District, Business Park Option, Planned
Community District) (76.76 acres)
Request To: PUD (Planned Unit Development) (76.76 acres)
Proposed Use PUD to allow commercial / commerce-business
park uses
Location Approximately 530 feet south of the southwest
corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard
Owner Mayo Clinic Arizona
Applicant/Representative Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations

The purpose of this addendum is to revise the staff recommended stipulations to
account for modifications requested from the Street Transportation Department to
remove any inference that there is flexibility to administratively modify improvement
requirements established through a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) or approved master
plans.

Staff recommends approval subject to the following revised stipulations:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Mayo Clinic Discovery Oasis PUD
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of
this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped July 20, 2023, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date].




Page 522
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
July 31, 2023


2. A 10-foot-wide shared-use path easement (SUPE) shall be dedicated along the
east property line, adjacent to 64th Street, and a minimum 10-foot-wide shared-use
path (SUP) shall be constructed within the easement in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. The SUP may be provided in lieu of the required detached sidewalk
within the right-of-way if the landscape strip is provided per Section D1.I.2 of the
PUD Development Narrative.

3. A 10-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated adjacent to the
western edge of the PUD area, and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT)
shall be constructed within the easement to connect south to Reach 11 trails in
accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. Master plans, per the requirements of the Planned Community District (PCD),
Section 636 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted, and shall be
updated with each phase of development, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department and the Planning and Development Department. The initial master
plans submitted by the master developer shall include the following:

a. Complete build-out of detached sidewalks, landscape within landscape
strips, buffered bike lanes, and shared-use paths along 56th Street, Mayo
Boulevard and 64th Street per the Street Standards section of the PUD
Narrative, to be included on the Master Open Space, Pedestrian, Bicycle
and Trails Plan and the Master Landscape Plan.

b. Complete build-out of bicycle repair stations per the Bicycle Infrastructure
section of the PUD Narrative, to be included on the Master Open Space,
Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trails Plan.

c. A Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Plan to include internal pedestrian
and bicycle circulation on site that enhances pedestrian and bicyclist
convenience, safety, and comfort.

5. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AO, on Panel
1315 L of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated January 4, 2021. The
following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain boundary limits
on the Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that impacts to the proposed
facilities have been considered, following the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3). This includes, but
not limited to provisions in the latest versions of the Floodplain Ordinance
of the Phoenix City Code.



Page 523
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
July 31, 2023


b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of the Street Transportation Department
for review and approval of Floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-
33) based on construction plans to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of Grading and Drainage permits.

d. The developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-
33) based on buildings under construction and a minimum 95% compaction
test results for the building pads to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of building permits.

e. The developer shall provide Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33)
based on finished construction to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

6. The developer shall submit Master Street Plans associated with the Traffic Impact
Analysis, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

7. The developer shall be responsible for design, redesign, and construction of all
warranted and affected traffic signals as identified by the APPROVED STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Traffic Impact Study and Master Street Plans,
as approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department.

8. Roadway improvements, as stipulated, shall be installed in accordance with the
approved Master Street Plan and Traffic Impact Study approved phasing plan, as
approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department.

9. Any proposed access to public right-of-way shall conform to the City-approved
Street Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines for location and spacing, as
approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department.

10. The developer shall construct all necessary roadway infrastructure improvements
as required by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) within ADOT
jurisdiction, as approved or modified by ADOT.

11. The developer shall be required to perfect existing right-of-way easements
controlled by the property as fee title, as approved or modified by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

12. The subject site shall conform to the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) land
sale, Application No. 53-122049, stipulations or subsequent development
agreements, as approved by the Street Transportation Department and the
Planning and Development Department.



Page 524
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
July 31, 2023


13. The developer shall construct the ultimate 100-year storm event box culvert dry
crossing along arterial streets identified for construction by the APPROVED Master
Street Plan to their full limits, including the construction of the upstream and
downstream maintenance access ramps, as approved or modified by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

14. The developer shall be responsible for all 404 permitting, environmental and
archeological assessments and associated easement dedications to construct and
maintain the ultimate box culvert dry crossing along arterial streets identified for
construction by the APPROVED Master Street Plan, as approved or modified by
the Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.

15. Right-of-way shall be dedicated for 64th Street from the existing Arizona
Department of Transportation (ADOT) traffic interchange north to Deer Valley Road,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department. The dedication shall
consist of applicable slope and drainage easements from existing interchange
tapering to a minimum 140-foot right-of-way to Deer Valley Road, as approved or
modified by the Street Transportation Department and the Planning and
Development Department.

16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility
standards.

17. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence and
operational characteristics of the Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future
owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall
be according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.

18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis
review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

19. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing
and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

20. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I
data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.

Page 525
Addendum A to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
July 31, 2023



21. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.

22. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.




Page 526
ATTACHMENT D




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-4-23-2


Date of VPC Meeting April 4, 2023
Request From R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD)
Request To PUD
Proposed Use Commercial/commerce-business park uses.
Location Approximately 530 feet south of the southwest corner of
64th Street and Mayo Boulevard


VPC DISCUSSION:

Cases GPA-DSTV-1-23-2 and Z-4-23-2 were heard concurrently.

Five members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION

Sarah Stockham, staff, described the Desert Ridge Specific Plan amendment process
and provided an overview of the location of the subject site and the proposed amended
text.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION

Nick Wood, representing the applicant with Snell and Wilmer, LLP, described the
project area, purchase history, GPA and rezoning requests, proposed development
types, traffic improvements and displayed the open space and pedestrian circulation
plan.

Mark Engstrom, with Mayo Clinic, described Mayo’s initiative to further to expand their
facilities. Mr. Engstrom stated Mayo’s three focus areas are regarding a sustainable
environment and that new buildings will be built to LEED standards, community
engagement via food trucks, parks and events that residents can enjoy on the
weekends and managing traffic. Mr. Engstrom added that they would like to add retail
and amenities on site to support employees and visitors and are exploring a mechanism
to get users from/to Mayo and the Desert Ridge shopping center.


QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 527
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-4-23-2
April 4, 2023
Page 2



Committee Member Rick Powell stated he enjoyed the presentation and inquired
about the southeast corner of 56th Street and the 101 Freeway and if that would be
developed early on. Mr. Wood stated it would be developed early on and they are
expecting a mix of uses. Mr. Powell inquired about Mayo Clinic being a not-for-profit
organization and if they pay some property taxes. Mr. Engstrom stated Mayo Clinic is
tax-exempt, retains ownership of the land but each development will be privately owned
and not tax-exempt.

Committee Member Rick Nowell asked the applicant to speak to being exempt from
the Desert Ridge Comprehensive Sign Plan. Mr. Engstrom replied that they will
integrate signage standards from the Desert Ridge Specific Plan and the PUD so that it
is all cohesive given the different users on the site, there are some existing monument
signs, and they are looking to have signage to direct patients and families from the
freeway. Mr. Wood added that they do not intend to have billboards.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

Kelli Slavik introduced herself as a resident in Paradise Ridge who recently purchased
a home in the area. Ms. Slavik asked for clarification on the lot coverage and number of
stories being requested under this PUD, sharing that 100% lot coverage and 250 feet in
height abutting residential is inappropriate, asked that she be kept in the loop even
though she is outside of the 600-foot notification area, shared a concern about water
flow and potential flooding, and asked that a traffic study be completed.

Committee Member Michelle Santoro asked what the distance is between 64th Street
and the homes to the east.

Mr. Wood replied that there is a vacant parcel zoned R1-6 owned by ASLD that is
around 50 acres in size east of 64th Street, the homes are to the east of that, the wash
will be channelized which will reduce flood impact, 250 feet in height is already
approved in the Desert Ridge Specific Plan, those buildings will not be put near
residential, but they are asking for the height so that they have options. Mr. Engstrom
added that they are trying to address two surrounding washes nearby that fall across
their site, and the lot coverage is 75% for the PUD.

Committee Member Rick Nowell asked for clarification that the Desert Ridge Specific
Plan allows for 0.85 FAR (floor area ratio). Mr. Engstrom replied affirmatively.

Carol Shilliday introduced herself as a nearby resident and a board member of the
Paradise Ridge Homeowner’s Association. Ms. Shilliday inquired about the notification
requirement as she hasn’t received anything and shared concern that this request is a
blank check for Mayo.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 528
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-4-23-2
April 4, 2023
Page 3


Rich Santoro introduced himself as a nearby resident and inquired about Mayo’s
current height. Mr. Engstrom shared it is not 250 tall, the clinic is around 175 feet tall.
Mr. Santoro asked if the facility is going to be used to treat and research infectious
diseases, and if it will use CRISPR technology. Mr. Engstrom replied that they will not
have Level 4 labs, will not have experimental disease research and they will not treat
animals or birds. Mr. Santoro added that Mayo does not take Medicare unless you are a
legacy patient, asked what the benefit is to the community, and shared a concern with
getting to the hospital on time. Mr. Engstrom replied that he believed Mayo does take
Medicare and that due to high demand, scheduling appointments can be difficult.

Vijay Vittal introduced himself as a local resident and inquired about the Mayo Clinic
being in proximity to the City of Phoenix Water Treatment Facility and asked how the
proposal will impact the facility. Mr. Wood replied the applicant is aware and their
proposal will not impact the facility.

Katherine Box yielded her team to Carol Shilliday. Ms. Shilliday mentioned she was
unaware of the ongoings of what Mayo has planned, shared that she thought the
applicant needed to go back and have a neighborhood meeting, the Desert Ridge
Specific Plan calls for two-story buildings, and that there is no guarantee Mayo will not
sell the site once it is rezoned.

APPLICANT RESPONSE

Mr. Wood shared the city requires applicants to send letters to registered neighborhood
organizations in a one-mile radius and to property owners within 600 feet of the site,
and they go above that and notify those within 700 feet. Mr. Wood added that the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan already allows 250 feet in height, they are looking for
flexibility, and that Mayo does not intent to sell the land. Mr. Wood shared there are no
site plans, elevations, or landscape plans at this time, however they look forward to
coming back before the VPC.

COMMITTEE DICUSSION

Chairman Bowser inquired about impact fees and if they apply. Mr. Wood stated there
are impact fees that apply in the area.

Committee Member Rick Powell inquired about $50 million that will be used for
infrastructure and asked what is it for and when it will be used. Mr. Engstrom shared
those fees will be codified in a development agreement that includes improvements to
roads, drainage, and the signalization of 64th Street and Mayo.

Committee Member Doug Dickson recommended that Ms. Shilliday register the HOA
with the City of Phoenix to receive notification for all items like this one, the VPC had
approved the height years ago, and the public can provide more input on this topic as
this rezoning case continues and they can speak to the Mayor and City Council as well.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 529
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-4-23-2
April 4, 2023
Page 4



Committee Member Rick Nowell shared there is a lot of open space on the site and
asked if each site development will have to go through the rezoning process and come
back to the VPC. Mr. Wood replied that individual sites would not come back to the
VPC.

Chair Bowser added that the sites would go through the development review process
and be reviewed by staff, and if they need to request variances they would need to go
through that process. Chair Bowser reiterated that this request would come back to the
VPC for recommendation, and then to Planning Commission and City Council for final
approval.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 530
ATTACHMENT E




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-4-23-2
* REVISED October 5, 2023

Date of VPC Meeting August 1, 2023
Request From R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD)
Request To PUD
Proposed Use Commercial/commerce-business park uses.
Location Approximately 530 feet south of the southwest corner of
64th Street and Mayo Boulevard
* VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation (Addendum A)
VPC Vote 9-2


VPC DISCUSSION:

Item No. 6 (GPA-DSTV-1-23-2) and Item No. 7 (Z-4-23-2) are companion cases and
were heard together.

Committee Member Michelle Santoro returned to the meeting, bringing quorum to 11
members.

No members of the public registered to speak on this item.

STAFF PRESENTATION
Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided a presentation on the proposal, summarizing the
Desert Ridge Specific Plan amendment and the rezoning to PUD, providing information
about the proposed development, and describing the staff recommendation on both
cases, including recommended stipulations.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION
Nick Wood, representing the applicant with Snell & Wilmer, LLP, described the
proposed development and the goals for the Mayo Clinic expansion. He further
described the proposed development standards and the enhanced features related to
the city’s policy goals.

QUESTIONS FROM COMMITTEE
Committee Member Powell asked about the height of the proposed subacute facility at
the eastern edge of the site. Mr. Wood replied that it would be three stories. Mr. Powell
asked about the build-out of 64th Street. Christine Mackay, the City of Phoenix
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 531
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-4-23-2
August 1, 2023
Page 2


Community and Economic Development Department Director, replied that the City is
responsible for the build-out of 64th Street, per a development agreement. Chuck
Wright, a member of the development team with Kimley-Horn, added that it will be
three lanes in each direction with a median. Mr. Powell asked if the shared use paths
would be landscaped. Mr. Wood replied that they will be.

Committee Member Nowell asked for clarification on the bicycle lanes on Mayo
Boulevard and the space for pedestrian traffic. Mr. Wright replied that they will be
buffered bike lanes and that pedestrians will be in a separate sidewalk area.

Committee Member Kirkilas asked about the necessity of reducing the setback to the
Reach 11 from 100 feet to 65 feet. Mr. Wood replied that the development needs the
space.

Vice Chair Lagrave asked about the timeframe for build-out. Mr. Wood stated it would
be 20 to 30 years.

Committee Member Kollar asked about the biosecurity level of the proposed wet lab.
Ms. Mackay replied that it will be BSL 2.

Committee Member Nowell stated a concern about after hours lighting at the proposed
development. Mr. Wood replied with the lighting requirements, which will be 1 foot
candle at the property boundaries. Chair Bowser added that 1 foot candle is a low level
of light.

Committee Member Powell stated a concern about the proposed 250-foot height limit,
adding that near the freeway is appropriate, but not near the eastern edge. Mr. Wood
stated that the development needs the flexibility, although they may never build that tall.

Vice Chair Lagrave stated that the proposal is near the core and is designated as a
regional center, adding that he is in favor.

Committee Member Dickson stated that the original 250-foot height limit for the Mayo
Clinic was approved without much controversy and that this proposal isn’t much
different since it is still a far distance from the nearest homeowners, adding that he is in
favor.

Committee Member Younger asked for clarification that the 250-foot height limit is
proposed in case a portion of the development needs it in the future. Mr. Wood replied
affirmatively, adding it is needed for flexibility. Chair Bowser clarified that the 250-foot
height would only be for a maximum of 10 percent of the site.

Committee Member Kirkilas stated that the height proposed isn’t a compromise if the
height is not allowed today. Mr. Wood stated that the proposal could do more than 10


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 532
Desert View Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-4-23-2
August 1, 2023
Page 3


percent of the lot area with the additional height, but the proposed 10 percent limit
represents a more limited approach.

Vice Chair Lagrave stated that he supports the proposal.

Committee Member Powell stated he has concerns about the height in the PUD area.
Mr. Wood reiterated the need for the option of additional height.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.

MOTION - Z-4-23-2
Vice Chair Lagrave made a motion to recommend approval of Z-4-23-2, per the staff
* recommendation (Addendum A). Committee Member Reginald Younger seconded
the motion for approval.

VOTE - Z-4-23-2
9-2, motion to recommend approval of Z-4-23-2, per the staff recommendation
* (Addendum A), passed; Committee Members Barto, Dickson, Kollar, Nowell,
Reynolds, Santoro, Younger, Lagrave, and Bowser in favor; Committee Members
Kirkilas and Powell opposed.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 533
ATTACHMENT F




ADDENDUM B
Staff Report: Z-4-23-2
October 3, 2023

Desert View Village Planning August 1, 2023
Committee Meeting Date
Planning Commission Hearing Date October 5, 2023

Request From: R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD) (Single-Family
Residence District) (Approved Commerce Park
District / Business Park Option, Planned
Community District) (76.76 acres)
Request To: PUD (Planned Unit Development) (76.76 acres)
Proposed Use PUD to allow commercial / commerce-business
park uses
Location Approximately 530 feet south of the southwest
corner of 64th Street and Mayo Boulevard
Owner Mayo Clinic Arizona
Applicant/Representative Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to stipulations

The purpose of this addendum is to recommend additional stipulations to further limit
certain uses due to trip generation and to clarify and refine site design standards.

Rezoning Case No. Z-4-23-2 is a request to rezone 76.76 acres from R1-18 (Approved
CP/BP PCD) (Single-Family Residence District, Approved Commerce Park
District/Business Park Option, Planned Community District) to PUD (Planned Unit
Development) for the Mayo Clinic PUD to allow commercial / commerce-business park
uses.

The Desert View Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on August 1,
2023, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a 9-2 vote.

The Street Transportation Department requested that the applicant limit medical office
uses due to the use’s higher trip generation. Medical office uses will become limited
during the master planning process as required by the PUD and as currently stipulated.
The applicant also requested the following modifications to the PUD to further limit other
uses, such as non-residential uses and multifamily residential, along with some other
changes necessary:
 Add “hospital” to the permitted uses list due to uses with overnight facilities that
would be likely, such as post-surgical care or rehab.
 Change non-residential uses from a five percent limitation of the development
parcel area to a gross floor area limitation of 500,000 square feet.

Page 534
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
October 3, 2023

 Delete “single-family residential” as a permitted use.
 Reduce the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) from 0.85 to 0.65.
 Limit the maximum density to 200 dwelling units.

Additionally, staff recommends the following modifications to the PUD:
 List multifamily residential as a use separate from commercial uses to clarify that
multifamily residential uses are not limited to a maximum area of the
development parcel that non-residential uses will be limited to.
 Change “Uses permitted per Section 622…” to “Non-residential uses permitted
per Section 622…” since multifamily residential will be listed separately.
 List both non-residential uses and multifamily residential in the “enhanced”
permitted uses list since they are not currently permitted uses.
 List all other uses, other than Commerce Park (Business Park Option) uses, in
the “enhanced” section since those uses are not currently permitted.
 Delete the “biomedical and medical research offices and/or laboratory” use since
it is already a permitted use in the Commerce Park District/Business Park Option.
 Delete a design guideline related to sight visibility triangles within parking
garages as this is already a requirement.
 Modify several design guidelines from (R) requirements to (R*) requirements due
to their subjective nature, which would go before the Design Review Committee if
the applicant elected to pursue relief from those requirement.
 Update the FAA’S FORM-7460 requirement to apply to buildings that exceed 70
feet in height.
 Make technical corrections.

Staff recommends approval subject to the following revised stipulations:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Mayo Clinic PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and Development
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The updated
Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development Narrative date
stamped July 20, 2023, as modified by the following stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date].

B. PAGE 5, PURPOSE AND INTENT, A2: OVERALL DESIGN CONCEPT:
UPDATE MAP IMAGE TO INDICATE THE ASU PROPERTY
(DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 3.CP/BP.3) IS NOT A PART.

C. PAGE 6, LAND USE PLAN, B2: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SUMMARY,
2ND PARAGRAPH: REVISE TARGET OF DEVELOPMENT FROM 3.3
MILLION SQUARE FEET TO 2.17 MILLION SQUARE FEET.




Page 535
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
October 3, 2023

D. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES: AFTER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH, ADD A
NEW PARAGRAPH STATING, “THE FOLLOWING USES ARE
SEPARATED INTO A “BASE” SECTION AND AN “ENHANCED”
SECTION. THE “BASE” SECTION INCLUDES USES THAT WOULD
NOT TRIGGER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THE “ENHANCED”
SECTION INCLUDES USES THAT WOULD TRIGGER ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS, PER SECTION D5 OF THIS PUD”.

E. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES: ADD A HEADER “BASE PERMITTED USES”
ABOVE A.

F. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES: MOVE THE “ENHANCED PERMITTED USES”
HEADER ABOVE B.

G. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES, B.: REPLACE WITH THE FOLLOWING:

NON-RESIDENTIAL USES PERMITTED PER SECTION 622,
COMMERCIAL C-1 DISTRICT, OF THE PHOENIX ZONING
ORDINANCE, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:

1) SUCH USES ARE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 500,000
SQUARE FEET

2) THE MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR ANY ONE TENANT
OR USER SHALL NOT EXCEED 10,000 SQUARE FEET

H. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES: ADD “HOSPITAL” AS A PERMITTED USE IN
THE “BASE” SECTION AFTER B.

I. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES, ENHANCED PERMITTED USES: DELETE
TEXT AFTER “MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL” FOR D, DELETE E
(SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL), DELETE “OR HOME” AFTER
COMMUNITY RESIDENCE CENTER, AND RE-LETTER ACCORDINGLY.

J. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES, ENHANCED PERMITTED USES: DELETE G
“BIOMEDICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH OFFICES AND/OR
LABORATORY” AND RE-LETTER ACCORDINGLY.

K. PAGE 9, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: AFTER THE FIRST
PARAGRAPH, ADD A NEW PARAGRAPH THAT STATES, “MAXIMUM
BUILDING HEIGHT AND FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) STANDARDS
ARE SEPARATED INTO A “BASE” SECTION AND AN “ENHANCED”
SECTION. THE “BASE” SECTION INCLUDES USES THAT WOULD
NOT TRIGGER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THE “ENHANCED”
SECTION INCLUDES USES THAT WOULD TRIGGER ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS, PER SECTION D5 OF THIS PUD. ALL OTHER
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLY FOR ALL TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PUD.”.

Page 536
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
October 3, 2023


L. PAGE 9, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: ADD A NEW DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD FOR “MAXIMUM DENSITY” BEFORE “MAXIMUM
BUILDING HEIGHTS”, TO SAY “MAXIMUM DENSITY: 200 DWELLING
UNITS”, AND RE-LETTER ACCORDINGLY.

M. PAGE 9, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, FLOOR AREA RATIO,
ENHANCED FAR: REPLACE 0.85 WITH 0.65.

N. PAGE 10, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, BICYCLE PARKING, 2:
DELETE THE PROVISION FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES
AND RE-NUMBER ACCORDINGLY.

O. PAGE 17, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES:
REPLACE “ENHANCED” WITH “ELEVATED” IN THE TITLE AND ADD
A PARAGRAPH BEFORE THE FIRST PARAGRAPH THAT STATES
“THESE DESIGN GUIDELINES SHALL APPLY TO ALL DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN THE PUD.”

P. PAGE 17, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
1ST PARAGRAPH: ADD “AND (R*)” AT THE END OF THE
PARAGRAPH, BEFORE THE COLON.

Q. PAGE 18, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
GRADING/DRAINAGE, 2.3: REPLACE “SHOULD” WITH “SHALL”.

R. PAGE 18, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANT MATERIALS, 3.1.1: REPLACE
“SHOULD” WITH “SHALL” IN THE BEGINNING AND END OF THE
SENTENCE.

S. PAGE 20, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
PARKING/CIRCULATION, PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN, 6.2.7:
DELETE THIS DESIGN GUIDELINE.

T. PAGE 22, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION, ARCHITECTURE, 3.1: REPLACE
“COMPLIMENT” WITH “COMPLEMENT”.

U. PAGE 22, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION, ARCHITECTURE, 3.2: REPLACE
“COMPLIMENTARY” WITH “COMPLEMENTARY”.

V. PAGE 17 – 24, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN
GUIDELINES: REPLACE (R) WITH (R*) FOR DESIGN GUIDELINES
A.2.3, A.3.1.5, A.3.1.9, A.3.1.11, A.3.4.1, A.3.4.2, A.4.1, A.6.1.9, A.6.2.3,
A.6.2.4, A.6.2.10, A.6.3.2, A.7.1, A.7.2, A.8.5 THROUGH A.8.8, B.1.2
THROUGH B.5.5, AND B.6.2 THROUGH B.7.5.

Page 537
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
October 3, 2023


W. PAGE 24 – 25, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ADDITIONAL DESIGN
GUIDELINES: REPLACE (R) WITH (R*) FOR DESIGN GUIDELINES 1, 2,
4, 5, AND 7 THROUGH 11.

X. PAGE 27, SUSTAINABILITY: INCLUDE THE GREEN STORMWATER
INFRASTRUCTURE AND WASTE STATIONS PROVISIONS IN THE
“ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES” SECTION.

2. A 10-foot-wide shared-use path easement (SUPE) shall be dedicated along the
east property line, adjacent to 64th Street, and a minimum 10-foot-wide shared-use
path (SUP) shall be constructed within the easement in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. The SUP may be provided in lieu of the required detached sidewalk
within the right-of-way if the landscape strip is provided per Section D1.I.2 of the
PUD Development Narrative.

3. A 10-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated adjacent to the
western edge of the PUD area, and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT)
shall be constructed within the easement to connect south to Reach 11 trails in
accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. Master plans, per the requirements of the Planned Community District (PCD),
Section 636 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted, and shall be
updated with each phase of development, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department and the Planning and Development Department. The initial master
plans submitted by the master developer shall include the following:

a. Complete build-out of detached sidewalks, landscape within landscape
strips, buffered bike lanes, and shared-use paths along 56th Street, Mayo
Boulevard and 64th Street per the Street Standards section of the PUD
Narrative, to be included on the Master Open Space, Pedestrian, Bicycle
and Trails Plan and the Master Landscape Plan.

b. Complete build-out of bicycle repair stations per the Bicycle Infrastructure
section of the PUD Narrative, to be included on the Master Open Space,
Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trails Plan.

c. A Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Plan to include internal pedestrian
and bicycle circulation on site that enhances pedestrian and bicyclist
convenience, safety, and comfort.

5. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AO, on Panel
1315 L of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated January 4, 2021. The
following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:


Page 538
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
October 3, 2023

a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain boundary limits
on the Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that impacts to the proposed
facilities have been considered, following the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3). This includes, but
not limited to provisions in the latest versions of the Floodplain Ordinance
of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of the Street Transportation Department
for review and approval of Floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-
33) based on construction plans to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of Grading and Drainage permits.

d. The developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-
33) based on buildings under construction and a minimum 95% compaction
test results for the building pads to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of building permits.

e. The developer shall provide Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33)
based on finished construction to Floodplain Management for approval
prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

6. The developer shall submit Master Street Plans associated with the Traffic Impact
Analysis, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

7. The developer shall be responsible for design, redesign, and construction of all
warranted and affected traffic signals as identified by the APPROVED STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Traffic Impact Study and Master Street Plans,
as approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department.

8. Roadway improvements, as stipulated, shall be installed in accordance with the
approved Master Street Plan and Traffic Impact Study approved phasing plan, as
approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department.

9. Any proposed access to public right-of-way shall conform to the City-approved
Street Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines for location and spacing, as
approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department.

10. The developer shall construct all necessary roadway infrastructure improvements
as required by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) within ADOT
jurisdiction, as approved or modified by ADOT.

11. The developer shall be required to perfect existing right-of-way easements
controlled by the property as fee title, as approved or modified by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department.


Page 539
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
October 3, 2023

12. The subject site shall conform to the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) land
sale, Application No. 53-122049, stipulations or subsequent development
agreements, as approved by the Street Transportation Department and the
Planning and Development Department.

13. The developer shall construct the ultimate 100-year storm event box culvert dry
crossing along arterial streets identified for construction by the APPROVED Master
Street Plan to their full limits, including the construction of the upstream and
downstream maintenance access ramps, as approved or modified by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

14. The developer shall be responsible for all 404 permitting, environmental and
archeological assessments and associated easement dedications to construct and
maintain the ultimate box culvert dry crossing along arterial streets identified for
construction by the APPROVED Master Street Plan, as approved or modified by the
Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

15. Right-of-way shall be dedicated for 64th Street from the existing Arizona
Department of Transportation (ADOT) traffic interchange north to Deer Valley Road,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department. The dedication shall
consist of applicable slope and drainage easements from existing interchange
tapering to a minimum 140-foot right-of-way to Deer Valley Road, as approved or
modified by the Street Transportation Department and the Planning and
Development Department.

16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility
standards.

17. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence and
operational characteristics of the Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future
owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall
be according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.

18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed
development THAT EXCEEDS 70 FEET IN HEIGHT from the FAA pursuant to the
FAA’s Form-7460 obstruction analysis review process, prior to construction permit
approval, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department.

19. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing
and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.



Page 540
Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-4-23-2
October 3, 2023

20. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I
data testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall
conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations.

21. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the
Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.

22. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.




Page 541
ATTACHMENT G


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
October 5, 2023

ITEM NO: 3
DISTRICT NO.: 2
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-4-23-2 (Mayo Clinic PUD) (Related Case GPA-DSTV-1-23-2) (Continued
from June 1, 2023; August 3, 2023; and September 7, 2023)
Location: Approximately 530 feet south of the southwest corner of 64th Street and
Mayo Boulevard
From: R1-18 (Approved CP/BP PCD)
To: PUD
Acreage: 76.76
Proposal: Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow commercial/commerce-business
park uses
Applicant: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Owner: Mayo Clinic Arizona
Representative: Nick Wood, Snell & Wilmer, LLP

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum B Staff Report.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Desert View 4/4/2023 Information only.
Desert View 5/2/2023 Continued. Vote: 9-0.
Desert View 6/6/2023 Continued. Vote: 10-0.
Desert View 8/1/2023 Approval, per the staff recommendation (Addendum A). Vote: 9-2.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Addendum B Staff Report.

Motion Discussion: Commissioner Boyd made a MOTION to approve Z-4-23-2, per the
Addendum B Staff Report, with the deletion of Stipulation 1.L.

Commissioner Busching seconded the MOTION.

There was discussion amongst the commission members.

Chairman Howard called for a vote. The motion failed with a tie vote, 3 (Boyd, Busching, Perez)
to 3 (Gorraiz, Howard, Jaramillo).

Commissioner Gorraiz then made a MOTION to approve Z-4-23-2, per the Addendum B Staff
Report.

Commissioner Jaramillo seconded the MOTION.




Page 542
Motion details: Commissioner Gorraiz made a MOTION to approve Z-4-23-2, per the Addendum
B Staff Report.

Maker: Gorraiz
Second: Jaramillo
Vote: 6-0-1 (Conflict: Simon)
Absent: Gaynor and Mangum
Opposition Present: No

Findings:

1. The proposed PUD is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map designation and
compatible with the existing land use pattern in the surrounding area.

2. The proposed PUD will allow for development that will provide employment
opportunities in a designated employment center.

3. The proposed PUD sets forth design and development standards that will enhance
connectivity in the immediate vicinity by providing shaded detached sidewalks, a
shared-use path, and enhanced shading, visibility and safety for pedestrians and
bicyclists.

Stipulations:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Mayo Clinic PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and Development
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The updated
Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development Narrative date stamped
July 20, 2023, as modified by the following stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date].

B. PAGE 5, PURPOSE AND INTENT, A2: OVERALL DESIGN CONCEPT:
UPDATE MAP IMAGE TO INDICATE THE ASU PROPERTY (DEVELOPMENT
PARCEL 3.CP/BP.3) IS NOT A PART.

C. PAGE 6, LAND USE PLAN, B2: CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SUMMARY, 2ND
PARAGRAPH: REVISE TARGET OF DEVELOPMENT FROM 3.3 MILLION
SQUARE FEET TO 2.17 MILLION SQUARE FEET.

D. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES: AFTER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH, ADD A NEW
PARAGRAPH STATING, “THE FOLLOWING USES ARE SEPARATED INTO A
“BASE” SECTION AND AN “ENHANCED” SECTION. THE “BASE” SECTION
INCLUDES USES THAT WOULD NOT TRIGGER ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS. THE “ENHANCED” SECTION INCLUDES USES THAT
WOULD TRIGGER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, PER SECTION D5 OF
THIS PUD”.

E. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES: ADD A HEADER “BASE PERMITTED USES” ABOVE
A.

F. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES: MOVE THE “ENHANCED PERMITTED USES”
HEADER ABOVE B.
Page 543
G. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES, B.: REPLACE WITH THE FOLLOWING:

NON-RESIDENTIAL USES PERMITTED PER SECTION 622, COMMERCIAL
C-1 DISTRICT, OF THE PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS:

1) SUCH USES ARE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 500,000 SQUARE
FEET

2) THE MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR ANY ONE TENANT OR
USER SHALL NOT EXCEED 10,000 SQUARE FEET

H. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES: ADD “HOSPITAL” AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE
“BASE” SECTION AFTER B.

I. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES, ENHANCED PERMITTED USES: DELETE TEXT
AFTER “MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL” FOR D, DELETE E (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL), DELETE “OR HOME” AFTER COMMUNITY RESIDENCE
CENTER, AND RE-LETTER ACCORDINGLY.

J. PAGE 7, LIST OF USES, ENHANCED PERMITTED USES: DELETE G
“BIOMEDICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH OFFICES AND/OR LABORATORY”
AND RE-LETTER ACCORDINGLY.

K. PAGE 9, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: AFTER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH,
ADD A NEW PARAGRAPH THAT STATES, “MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
AND FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) STANDARDS ARE SEPARATED INTO A
“BASE” SECTION AND AN “ENHANCED” SECTION. THE “BASE” SECTION
INCLUDES USES THAT WOULD NOT TRIGGER ADDITIONAL
REQUIREMENTS. THE “ENHANCED” SECTION INCLUDES USES THAT
WOULD TRIGGER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, PER SECTION D5 OF
THIS PUD. ALL OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLY FOR ALL TYPE
OF DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PUD.”.

L. PAGE 9, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: ADD A NEW DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD FOR “MAXIMUM DENSITY” BEFORE “MAXIMUM BUILDING
HEIGHTS”, TO SAY “MAXIMUM DENSITY: 200 DWELLING UNITS”, AND RE-
LETTER ACCORDINGLY.

M. PAGE 9, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, FLOOR AREA RATIO, ENHANCED
FAR: REPLACE 0.85 WITH 0.65.

N. PAGE 10, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, BICYCLE PARKING, 2: DELETE
THE PROVISION FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AND RE-
NUMBER ACCORDINGLY.

O. PAGE 17, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES:
REPLACE “ENHANCED” WITH “ELEVATED” IN THE TITLE AND ADD A
PARAGRAPH BEFORE THE FIRST PARAGRAPH THAT STATES “THESE
DESIGN GUIDELINES SHALL APPLY TO ALL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE
PUD.”



Page 544
P. PAGE 17, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES, 1ST
PARAGRAPH: ADD “AND (R*)” AT THE END OF THE PARAGRAPH, BEFORE
THE COLON.

Q. PAGE 18, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
GRADING/DRAINAGE, 2.3: REPLACE “SHOULD” WITH “SHALL”.

R. PAGE 18, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, PLANT MATERIALS, 3.1.1: REPLACE
“SHOULD” WITH “SHALL” IN THE BEGINNING AND END OF THE SENTENCE.

S. PAGE 20, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
PARKING/CIRCULATION, PARKING STRUCTURE DESIGN, 6.2.7: DELETE
THIS DESIGN GUIDELINE.

T. PAGE 22, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION, ARCHITECTURE, 3.1: REPLACE
“COMPLIMENT” WITH “COMPLEMENT”.

U. PAGE 22, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES,
BUILDING DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION, ARCHITECTURE, 3.2: REPLACE
“COMPLIMENTARY” WITH “COMPLEMENTARY”.

V. PAGE 17 – 24, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ENHANCED DESIGN GUIDELINES:
REPLACE (R) WITH (R*) FOR DESIGN GUIDELINES A.2.3, A.3.1.5, A.3.1.9,
A.3.1.11, A.3.4.1, A.3.4.2, A.4.1, A.6.1.9, A.6.2.3, A.6.2.4, A.6.2.10, A.6.3.2,
A.7.1, A.7.2, A.8.5 THROUGH A.8.8, B.1.2 THROUGH B.5.5, AND B.6.2
THROUGH B.7.5.

W. PAGE 24 – 25, DESIGN GUIDELINES, ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES:
REPLACE (R) WITH (R*) FOR DESIGN GUIDELINES 1, 2, 4, 5, AND 7
THROUGH 11.

X. PAGE 27, SUSTAINABILITY: INCLUDE THE GREEN STORMWATER
INFRASTRUCTURE AND WASTE STATIONS PROVISIONS IN THE
“ADDITIONAL DESIGN GUIDELINES” SECTION.

2. A 10-foot-wide shared-use path easement (SUPE) shall be dedicated along the east
property line, adjacent to 64th Street, and a minimum 10-foot-wide shared-use path
(SUP) shall be constructed within the easement in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
The SUP may be provided in lieu of the required detached sidewalk within the right-of-
way if the landscape strip is provided per Section D1.I.2 of the PUD Development
Narrative.

3. A 10-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated adjacent to the
western edge of the PUD area, and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall
be constructed within the easement to connect south to Reach 11 trails in accordance
with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 545
4. Master plans, per the requirements of the Planned Community District (PCD), Section
636 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted, and shall be updated with
each phase of development, as approved by the Street Transportation Department and
the Planning and Development Department. The initial master plans submitted by the
master developer shall include the following:

a. Complete build-out of detached sidewalks, landscape within landscape strips,
buffered bike lanes, and shared-use paths along 56th Street, Mayo Boulevard
and 64th Street per the Street Standards section of the PUD Narrative, to be
included on the Master Open Space, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trails Plan and the
Master Landscape Plan.

b. Complete build-out of bicycle repair stations per the Bicycle Infrastructure section
of the PUD Narrative, to be included on the Master Open Space, Pedestrian,
Bicycle and Trails Plan.

c. A Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Plan to include internal pedestrian and
bicycle circulation on site that enhances pedestrian and bicyclist convenience,
safety, and comfort.

5. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AO, on Panel 1315 L
of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated January 4, 2021. The following
requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the floodplain boundary limits on the
Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that impacts to the proposed facilities
have been considered, following the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3). This includes, but not limited to provisions
in the latest versions of the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the Floodplain
Management section of the Street Transportation Department for review and
approval of Floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33)
based on construction plans to Floodplain Management for approval prior to
issuance of Grading and Drainage permits.

d. The developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33)
based on buildings under construction and a minimum 95% compaction test
results for the building pads to Floodplain Management for approval prior to
issuance of building permits.

e. The developer shall provide Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 086-0-33) based
on finished construction to Floodplain Management for approval prior to issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy.

6. The developer shall submit Master Street Plans associated with the Traffic Impact
Analysis, as approved by the Street Transportation Department.

7. The developer shall be responsible for design, redesign, and construction of all
warranted and affected traffic signals as identified by the APPROVED STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Traffic Impact Study and Master Street Plans, as
approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department.
Page 546
8. Roadway improvements, as stipulated, shall be installed in accordance with the
approved Master Street Plan and Traffic Impact Study approved phasing plan, as
approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department.

9. Any proposed access to public right-of-way shall conform to the City-approved Street
Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines for location and spacing, as approved or
modified by the Street Transportation Department.

10. The developer shall construct all necessary roadway infrastructure improvements as
required by the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) within ADOT jurisdiction,
as approved or modified by ADOT.

11. The developer shall be required to perfect existing right-of-way easements controlled by
the property as fee title, as approved or modified by the Street Transportation
Department and the Planning and Development Department.

12. The subject site shall conform to the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD) land sale,
Application No. 53-122049, stipulations or subsequent development agreements, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.

13. The developer shall construct the ultimate 100-year storm event box culvert dry crossing
along arterial streets identified for construction by the APPROVED Master Street Plan to
their full limits, including the construction of the upstream and downstream maintenance
access ramps, as approved or modified by the Street Transportation Department and the
Planning and Development Department.

14. The developer shall be responsible for all 404 permitting, environmental and
archeological assessments and associated easement dedications to construct and
maintain the ultimate box culvert dry crossing along arterial streets identified for
construction by the APPROVED Master Street Plan, as approved or modified by the
Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

15. Right-of-way shall be dedicated for 64th Street from the existing Arizona Department of
Transportation (ADOT) traffic interchange north to Deer Valley Road, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. The dedication shall consist of applicable slope
and drainage easements from existing interchange tapering to a minimum 140-foot right-
of-way to Deer Valley Road, as approved or modified by the Street Transportation
Department and the Planning and Development Department.

16. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and
other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department.
All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

17. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence and operational
characteristics of the Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future owners or tenants of
the property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the
templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney.




Page 547
18. The developer shall provide a No Hazard Determination for the proposed development
THAT EXCEEDS 70 FEET IN HEIGHT from the FAA pursuant to the FAA’s Form-7460
obstruction analysis review process, prior to construction permit approval, as per plans
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

19. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall conduct
Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the development area
for review and approval by the City Archeologist prior to clearing and grubbing,
landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

20. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I data
testing, the City Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, determines
such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II
archeological data recovery excavations.

21. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the developer
shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius of the
discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and allow time for the Archeology Office to
properly assess the materials.

22. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file
for record.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia
Galaviz 602-602-291-2559, TTY use 7-1-1




Page 548



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Consideration of Citizen Petition by Ms. Elizabeth Venable

This report provides the City Council with information in response to the citizen petition
submitted by Ms. Elizabeth Venable at the Sept. 20, 2023, Formal Meeting
(Attachment A).

Summary
On Sept. 20, 2023, Ms. Elizabeth Venable submitted a citizen petition to request that
the City of Phoenix “continuously record and regularly report data”, “retroactively and
moving forward”, related to the Office of Homeless Solution’s (OHS) engagement
efforts around the Human Services Campus. Upon review by the Law Department, this
submittal was determined to qualify as a citizen petition requiring action by the City
Council.

Ms. Venable requests the following data be reported to Council and the “public/media”
on a biweekly or monthly basis:
1. Locations of placements for each cleanup (engagement) in terms of name.
2. Number of constituents transported to each individual facility and location of each
facility.
3. Number of constituents accepting/rejecting initial offers of shelter from each cleanup
(engagement).
4. Length of stay of constituents in each facility in the following categories-Less than 1
whole day (24 hours), 1-7 whole days (1 week), 8-14 days (2 weeks), 15-21 days (3
weeks), 22-28 days (4 weeks), 29+ days (one month or more).
5. Reason for exit of the facility including but not limited to: 1. No exit; 2. Transfer to
another facility; 3. Personal voluntary exit/choice to leave; 4. Disciplinary/violations
of rules/emotional-behavioral disruption/drugs/weapons/other non-voluntary exit/not
choice to leave; 5. End of program limitations on time.

Staff Response
The Office of Homeless Solutions provides aggregate data (Items 2 and 3) related to



Page 549

its engagement efforts near the Human Services Campus. Most recently, this
information was provided during the September 13, 2023 report and presentation to
the City Council Economic Development and Housing Subcommittee. Updated data is
included in Attachment B. In the future, this information will continue to be provided
via the Office of Homeless Solutions Program report provided to the City Council in the
General Information Packet which is available to the public online.

With respect to information on individuals and families served including demographic
information, shelter placements and outcomes (Items 1, 4, and 5), OHS is not able to
release client-level data or personal identifiable information (PII). The City is legally
obligated to protect personal information of any resident for whom services are
provided, such as addresses of water and sanitation customers. Clients served
through OHS have the same right to privacy and safety.

In addition, once clients enter shelter or homelessness-related service, they cease to
become a client of OHS and become a client of the program entered. Homeless
service programs funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
must use a common database called the Homeless Information Management System
(“HMIS”) for tracking information on individuals and families served including
demographic information, shelter placements and outcomes, which is the information
sought in Items 1, 4, and 5 of Ms. Venable’s petition. The Maricopa Association of
Governments (MAG) is responsible for the maintenance, confidentiality, and security of
regional HMIS records. HMIS policies require confidentiality of client PII and prohibit
public disclosure of the location where a particular client is housed. Additional
confidentiality obligations apply in cases of family or domestic violence victims and
shelters that serve these populations.

OHS intends to evaluate the overall success of clients receiving services through
engagement efforts. Staff requested aggregate and anonymous information regarding
clients served and will be providing a report to City Council and the public when that
data becomes available.

Location
7th Avenue to 15th Avenue, Jefferson Street to the railroad tracks
Council District: 7

Recommendations
1. Approve the citizen petition in part by direction staff to provide additional requested
information that can be publicly shared through regular reporting process.




Page 550

2. Deny the citizen petition; information is already publicly available, while other
information is with other agencies or is personal identifying information that cannot be
publicly shared.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Office of
Homeless Solutions.




Page 551
ATTACHMENT A



Citizen Petition Elizabeth Venable September 20, 2023

To: Phoenix City Council Members and Phoenix City Manager

From:Elizabeth Venable, Fund for Empowerment, 1950 E Cortez St, Phoenix, AZ 85020, 602-
872-3465

It is my Citizens Petition request that the City of Phoenix, in the honor of transparency and
accountability, both retroactively and moving forward, continuously record and regularly report
data regarding the effectiveness of the placements of Phoenix residents from the “Zone” in
downtown.

The data I am requesting be continuously, regularly, and retroactively collected includes:

1. Locations of placements for each cleanup in terms of name
2. Number of constituents transported to each individual facility and location of each facility
3. Number of constituents accepting/rejecting initial offers of shelter from each cleanup
4. Length of stay of constituents in each facility in the following categories—Less than 1
whole day (24 hours), 1-7 whole days (1 week), 8-14 days (2 weeks), 15-21 days (3
weeks), 22-28 days (4 weeks), 29+ days (one month or more)
5. Reason for exit of the facility including but not limited to 1. No exit 2. Transfer to another
facility 3. Personal voluntary exit/choice to leave 4. Disciplinary/violations of
rules/emotional-behavioral disruption/drugs/weapons/other nonvoluntary exit/not choice
to leave 5. End of program limitations on time

The preceding measures should be collected continuously and reported biweekly or monthly to
Council and the public/media

The preceding measures together should be considered a more accurate tool of assessment of
the success of the placements of constituents relocated from the Zone, as listing the initial
acceptance rate is facile and does not relate a full portrait of the ability of the City to successfully
place constituents in shelters which meet their needs for a reasonable length of time (by this
assessment, a “month” or more).

This shall be considered creation of an ongoing assessment program as opposed to a one time
request for information.

As a member of the public who spent ages 0-18 in the same zip code as the Zone (85007)
these measures are important to me personally as I care about the lives of people from my
community and their treatment.

These measures should not be considered a feature of compliance with Fund for Empowerment
v. City of Phoenix or a manifestation of it at all, as it doesn’t specifically assess these measures
of success.




Page 552
This request and citizen petition should not be stopped in light of it being related to the specific
litigation, because it is not. It is an independent set of measures of how the City treats its most
vulnerable constituents.

Elizabeth Venable MA MPA




Page 553
ATTACHMENT B

Engagement Efforts Thus Far


# of People # of People
Percentage
Date Location Engaged on Day Accepting Indoor
Acceptance
of Effort Shelter

5/10/23 9th Avenue, Washington to Jefferson 60 47 78%

5/31/23 12th Avenue, Washington to Jefferson 44 37 84%

6/21/23 Madison, 8th to 9th Avenue 17 12 70.5%
Page 554 7/12/23 9th Avenue, Jefferson to Madison 29 25 85%

7/19/23 13th Avenue, Jefferson to Madison 34 26 76%

8/2/23 Madison, 9th to 10th Avenue 25 20 80%

8/23/23 9th Avenue, South of Jackson 39 28 72%

9/1/23 10th Avenue, Jefferson to Madison 11 11 100%

9/20/23 Madison, 10th to 11th Avenue 30 22 73%

TOTAL 289 228 79%
Shelter Percentage
CBI Bridge Housing 2.6%
CASS - Single Adult Shelter 3.8%
Diverted to Family/Friends 1.7%
Halle Women's Shelter 12.3%
Human Services Campus Weather Relief/Overflow 0.9%
Permanent Housing 0.9%
Respiro 1.7%
CBI - Rio Fresco 4.3%
CBI - Saguaro 4.3%
CBI - Maricopa County Temporary Hotel 0.4%
UMOM Family Shelter 4.3%
Washington Relief Center 49.8%
Native American Connections - The Lodge 9.8%
Treatment Facility 1.3%
Human Services Campus Temporary Hotel Shelter 2.1%
East Valley Men's Center 0.4%




Page 555

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

84 item(s)